HomeMy WebLinkAboutDR-01-04 - Decision - 0350 Dorset Street{i' , \ 1 1,
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION
STATE OF VERMONT
COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
Re: Findings of Fact, design review application #DR-01-06 of Margo Breen for a master
signage plan. The master signage plan consists of. 1) an indirectly illuminated, blue 13'
5" by 28" cut out letter "Net Result Fish Market" wall sign, 2) an indirectly illuminated,
white 14' by 10" cut out letter "The Net Result" wall sign, 3) an indirectly illuminated,
white 13' S" by 10" cut out letter "Vivaldi Flowers" wall sign, 4) an indirectly
illuminated, white 12' by 10" cut out letter "Merle Norman" wall sign, 5) an indirectly
illuminated white 10" cut out letter "Orbit" wall sign, 6) an indirectly illuminated, 26
square foot free standing sign on Dorset Street, and 7) an indirectly illuminated, 26
square foot free standing sign on San Remo Drive, 350 Dorset Street
On the 5th of June 2001, the South Burlington Development Review Board approved the
design review application of Margo Breen, under Section 4 and Section 23 of the South
Burlington Sign Regulations based on the following findings:
This project consists of a master signage plan application. The master signage plan
consists of. 1) an indirectly illuminated, blue 13' 5" by 28" cut out letter "Net Result
Fish Market" wall sign, 2) an indirectly illuminated, white 14' by 10" cut out letter
"The Net Result" wall sign, 3) an indirectly illuminated, white 13' 5" by 10" cut out
letter "Vivaldi Flowers" wall sign, 4) an indirectly illuminated, white 12' by 10" cut
out letter "Merle Norman" wall sign, 5) an indirectly illuminated white 10" cut out
letter "Orbit" wall sign, 6) an indirectly illuminated, 26 square foot free standing sign
on Dorset Street, and 7) an indirectly illuminated, 26 square foot free standing sign on
San Remo Drive, 350 Dorset Street.
2. The owner of record is Eric Flegenheimer.
3. This property is located within the Central District Two and Design District Two. It
is bounded on the north by a commercial property, on the west by Dorset Street, on
the south by a commercial property, and on the east by San Remo Drive.
4. Consistent Design: The proposed wall sign will utilize white foam letters similar to
the majority of the signs on the building. Two out of the three existing wall signs
utilize white foam lettering. The proposed freestanding sign panel will utilize a dark
red lettering on a white background. Two of the three existing sign panels utilize a
white background with dark lettering. All of the signs are indirectly lit.
5. Compatibility with City Center Goals: The proposed wall sign will utilize cut out
lettering revealing the wall material behind. This is a design that is echoed
throughout the south facade of the building. The wall sign will be indirectly
illuminated with lights casting light upward onto the sign with the roof canopy
blocking lighting from continuing beyond the fagade. This form of lighting is used
throughout the south fagade of the building and creates puddles of light that
complement the design of the fagade. The proposed wall sign will fit with the
existing signs in promoting an overall high aesthetic quality on the building. The
proposed freestanding sign panel will be mounted on the existing freestanding sign
which is framed by a planter. This planter hides the indirect lighting and creates a
landscaping features. The proposed panel will draw from the existing signs in its use
of a white background and dark lettering.
6. Color, Texture, & Materials: The proposed wall sign will utilize white foam blocks
similar to the existing wall signs. The free standing sign panel will be wood and
utilize a white background with dark red lettering similar to two other existing sign
panels.
7. Location of Features: The locations of the proposed signs are noted on photos
submitted.
8. Computation of Maximums: The applicant submitted information on the maximum
allowable size for each of the signs, the size and number of the signs proposed.
9. Color Scheme: The majority of the wall signs are white. The free standing sign
utilizes a variety of colors including gray, blue, black, and white. The majority of the
sign panel utilize a white background with dark lettering. The proposed sign panel
will utilize a white background with dark red lettering.
10. Letteringor r Graphic Style: The majority of the wall signs utilize cut out block
lettering. The Orbit window sign utilizes a script design. The freestanding sign
utilizes both script and block lettering.
11. Lighting_ The signs on this property utilize indirect illumination with lights place on
the ground shining up but blocked from creating glare by the roof canopy. The
freestanding sign is also indirectly illuminated.
12. Location of Sims on Buildings: The majority of the wall signs are located over the
storefronts below the roof line. The exception to this rule is the Net Result sign on
the southwest corner of the building.
13. Material: The majority of the wall signs are plastic foam. The majority of the free
standing sign employs wood construction.
14. Sign Proportions: All signs meet the dimensional requirements.
15. Consent: The owner of the property signed the design review application submitted.
16. Existing Signs Not Conforming: None.
DECISION AND CONDITIONS
Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Development Review Board
approves the design review application #DR-01-06 of Margo Breen for a master signage
plan. The master signage plan consists of: 1) an indirectly illuminated, blue 13' 5" by
28" cut out letter "Net Result Fish Market" wall sign, 2) an indirectly illuminated, white
14' by 10" cut out letter "The Net Result" wall sign, 3) an indirectly illuminated, white
13' 5" by 10" cut out letter "Vivaldi Flowers" wall sign, 4) an indirectly illuminated,
white 12' by 10" cut out letter "Merle Norman" wall sign, 5) an indirectly illuminated
white 10" cut out letter "Orbit" wall sign, 6) an indirectly illuminated, 26 square foot free
standing sign on Dorset Street, and 7) an indirectly illuminated, 26 square foot free
standing sign on San Remo Drive, 350 Dorset Street, as depicted on a seven (7) page set
of plans, page one entitled "Merle Norman", dated 5/8/01 with the following stipulations:
1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this
approval shall remain in effect.
2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed sign design is based
solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria
contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The
determination of whether or not this application complies with all other
requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Code
Officer.
3. The applicant shall obtain a sign permit pursuant to Section Five of the
Sign Ordinance or this approval is null and void.
4. Any change to the master signage plan shall require review by the South
Burlington Design Review Committee.
lU _, / 2 ,
Ju/a�ir
or Clerk Dad
th Burlington Development Review Board
Please Note: You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental Court, pursuant
to 24 V.S.A. § 4471 and VR.C.P. 76, in writing, within 30 days of the date this decision is issued. The fee
is ,$150.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to challenge this decision at some future time may
be lost because you waited too long. You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4472(d)
(exclusivity of remedy; finality).