HomeMy WebLinkAboutSD-19-07 - Supplemental - 1200 Airport Drive (20)1
Marla Keene
From:Terry Francis
Sent:Friday, May 3, 2019 5:08 PM
To:Marla Keene
Subject:Re: SD-19-07 1200 Airport Drive QTA for review
Currently there are only 2 manufacturers of these devices (tomar &3M) and they are 100% interoperable.
There are a mix of these in SB and Chitt. Cty.
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
From: Marla Keene <mkeene@sburl.com>
Date: 5/3/19 4:31 PM (GMT‐05:00)
To: Terry Francis <tfrancis@sburl.com>
Subject: FW: SD‐19‐07 1200 Airport Drive QTA for review
Hi Terry,
Thoughts on allowing the DRB decision to require “Opticon or equivalent” for the airport QTA? Paul is thinking that if
they use a different system (with your approval), and it differs from the approved site plan, they may be out of
compliance with their P&Z approval.
Marla Keene, PE
Development Review Planner
City of South Burlington
(802) 846‐4106
From: Paul Conner <pconner@sburl.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2019 1:18 PM
To: Marla Keene <mkeene@sburl.com>
Subject: RE: SD‐19‐07 1200 Airport Drive QTA for review
Good draft decision. Three small notes:
1. Can you check the spelling of Jon Linwahl’s name? I thought there was a D in there.
2. To Dalila’s question: Good Question. For now what if we drew the line at “if the board required them to do it”
(ie, plant a buffer)? Thoughts? Let’s put the bigger question to a group meeting and decide if that’s how we
want to communicate to applicants (from the start) moving forward. I think there’s a lot of merit to the idea but
would love to get all perspectives.
3. Where the DRB is requiring, based on the Fire Chief’s recommendation, use of an Opticon system. Is that a
specific requirement for a proprietary system or “that or an equivalent”? If the FD & Board are ok with an
equivalent, it might address a future problem if they want to use a different system.
2
Paul Conner, AICP
Director of Planning & Zoning
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
(802) 846‐4106
www.sbvt.gov
Notice ‐ Under Vermont’s Public Records Act, all e‐mail, e‐mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in
matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as
public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in
error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation.
From: Marla Keene <mkeene@sburl.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 3:36 PM
To: Paul Conner <pconner@sburl.com>
Subject: SD‐19‐07 1200 Airport Drive QTA for review
Hi Paul,
In all your spare time… draft decision ready for review.
Dalila has already reviewed this because a lot of the questions I had were related to what was said at the hearing. You
should be able to get through it quickly. One question in there for you.
Marla Keene, PE
Development Review Planner
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
(802) 846‐4106
www.southburlingtonvt.gov
Notice - Under Vermont’s Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters
concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which
may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by
return email. Thank you for your cooperation.