HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0337 Dorset StreetCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & 'ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
MEMORANDUM
TO: South Burlington Design Review Committee
FROM: Janet M. Hurley, Associate Planner
DATE: April 22, 2003
COPY TO: James Leary, Applicant
Miles Rice
Design Review Application DR-03-02
337 Dorset Street
The applicant is requesting approval to remove the existing siding and cover the existing
trim at 337 Dorset Street and replace or cover it with vinyl siding and metal trim of the same
color. The subject property falls within Design District 3 of the City Center Design Review
(CCDR) Overlay District. Pursuant to Section 24.10 of the Zoning Regulations and Section
11.01(C)(3) of the proposed Land Development Regulations, buildings in this district should
have pitched roofs, consist of wood, vinyl, brick, or stone materials, and contain natural or
subdued colors. Pursuant to Section 24.201(b) of the Zoning Regulations and Section
11.01(D)(1)(e) of the proposed Land Development Regulations, the addition or removal of
materials to or from the exterior shall be subject to design review by the Design Review
Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB).
Design plans for properties within Design District 3 shall comply with the following design
criteria. -
(a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of
major elements; and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All
sides of a building shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material,
window treatments, architectural accents, cornice/parapet design, etc. The design of
a building should consider the design features of other structures in the area so as
not to be harshly discordant with other nearby buildings.
The building design is not changing as a result of this proposal. Existing wood clapboards
will be replaced by vinyl of the same width and color. Existing wooden trim elements will be
wrapped with metal of the same color.
(b) Materials used. High quality, attractive materials shall be used on all buildings.
Natural, indigenous materials of stone and masonry are highly encouraged, if not
337 Dorset Street
Design Review Application DR-03-02
DRC April 28, 2003
Page 2 of 4
required. Natural, indigenous materials of stone, masonry and wood shall
predominate. Synthetic materials such as vinyl siding may be used in place of wood
provided it is of high quality and closely resembles wood clapboard/shingles. Other
materials may be used as an architectural accent provided they are harmonious with
the building and site.
The foundation needs to be
scraped and painted in places
where paint is currently
pealing.
Staff believes the proposed vinyl
siding and metal trim wrap are in
keeping with this standard. However,
staff notes that the foundation paint is
currently pealing and should be
scraped and replaced with fresh paint
of the same color.
(c) Colors and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be
harmonious with the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby.
Colors naturally occurring from building materials and other traditional, subdued
colors are encouraged. More than three (3) predominant colors are discouraged.
The building is primarily white with
black window shutters and a subdued
asphalt shingle roof. Texture is
smooth. These features will not
change as a result of the proposed
residing.
(d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment shall be a careful response to the
buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The
treatment of windows and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that
gives necessary order and unity to the facade, yet avoids monotony.
\dre\ eary\siding.srp.doc
337 Dorset Street
Design Review Application DR-03-02
DRC April 28, 2003
Page 3 of 4
No new windows or doors are
proposed. However, the existing
wooden trim is proposed to be
wrapped with metal of the same color
as the existing trim paint.
(e) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building.
They shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines.
For one-story structures, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be
8 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. For structures of two (2) or more stories, the
minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 5 on 12 and 12 on 12,
respectively. Only a small portion of roof area maybe flat provided it is not visible
from the public street, existing or planned, or does not detract from the overall design
and harmony of the building. Where portions of a roof are flat, architectural elements
such as comices and parapets shall be included to improve the appearance and
provide interest. Large, low -slope (i.e., less than 5 on 12) gable forms are
discouraged.
No changes to the existing roof are proposed.
(f) Orient buildings to the public street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that
relates the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks,
present an inviting street front and promote traditional street pattems.
The building is existing and already
oriented to the public street.
AGF_Nt N
M
d
\dreUeary\siding. srp.doc
337 Dorset Street
Design Review Application DR-03-02
DRC April 28, 2003
Page 4 of 4
(g) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be
used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to
minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure.
This criterion is not relevant to the current proposal.
(h) Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should
consider solar energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun's energy
during the winter and providing shade during the summer.
This criterion is not relevant to the current proposal.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval by the
Development Review Board of design review application #DR-03-02 conditional upon
the applicant scraping and painting areas on the foundation where paint is currently
pealing.
\dreVearylsiding.srp.doc
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
➢ EPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
May 9, 2003
James Leary
337 Dorset Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
Dear Mr. Leary:
DESIGN REVIEW #DR-03-02
337 DORSET STREET
Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Decision for the
above referenced project approved by the Development Review Board on May 9,
2003. Please contact this office to obtain a zoning permit for the approved work.
If you have any questions, please call the Planning and Zoning office.
Sincerely,
Ja ' et M. Hurley
Associate Planner
/jmh
Enclosure
1dreUeary\DR-03-02.cor. doc
c
CITY OF SOUTH BgJRI.INGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
(802) 846-4106
FAX (802) 846-4101
TO: South Burlington Design Review Committee
FROM. Janet M. Hurley, Associate Planner *
DATE. April 22, 2003
COPY TO: James Leary, Applicant
Miles Rice
Design Review Application DR-03-02
337 Dorset Street
The applicant is requesting approval to remove the existing siding and cover the existing
trim at 337 Dorset Street and replace or cover it with vinyl siding and metal trim of the same
color. The subject property falls within Design District 3 of the City Center Design Review
(CCDR) Overlay District. Pursuant to Section 24.10 of the Zoning Regulations and Section
11.01(C)(3) of the proposed Land Development Regulations, buildings in this district should
have pitched roofs, consist of wood, vinyl, brick, or stone materials, and contain natural or
subdued colors. Pursuant to Section 24.201(b) of the Zoning Regulations and Section
11.01(D)(1)(e) of the proposed Land Development Regulations, the addition or removal of
materials to or from the exterior shall be subject to design review by the Design Review
Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB).
Design plans for properties within Design District 3 shall comply with the following design
criteria:
(a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of
major elements, and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All
sides of a building shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material,
window treatments, architectural accents, cornice/parapet design, etc. The design of
a building should consider the design features of other structures in the area so as
not to be harshly discordant with other nearby buildings.
The building design is not changing as a result of this proposal. Existing wood clapboards
will be replaced by vinyl of the same width and color. Existing wooden trim elements will be
wrapped with metal of the same color.
(b) Materials used High quality, attractive materials shall be used on all buildings.
Natural, indigenous materials of stone and masonry are highly encouraged, if not
337 Dorset Street
Design Review Application DR-03-02
DRC Apkil 28, 2003
Page 2 of 4
required. natural, indigenous materials of stone, masonry and wood shall
predominate. Synthetic materials such as vinyl siding may be used in place of wood
provided it is of high quality and closely resembles wood clapboard/shingles. Other
materials may be used as an architectural accent provided they are harmonious with
the building and site.
1. The foundation needs to be
scraped and painted in places
where paint is currently
pealing.
Staff believes the proposed vinyl
siding and metal trim wrap are in
keeping with this standard. However,
staff notes that the foundation paint is
currently pealing and should be
scraped and replaced with fresh paint
of the same color.
(c) Colcrs and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be
hanmonious with the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby.
Colors naturally occurring from building materials and other traditional, subdued
colors are encouraged. More than three (3) predominant colors are discouraged.
The building is primarily white with
black window shutters and a subdued
asphalt shingle roof. Texture is
smooth. These features will not
change as a result of the proposed
residing.
(d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment shall be a careful response to the
buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The
treatment of windows and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that
gives necessary order and unity to the facade, yet avoids monotony.
\drrMeary\siding.srp.doc
337 Dorset Street
Design Review Application DR-03-02
DRC April 28, 2003
Page 3 of 4
No new windows or doors are
proposed. However, the existing
wooden trim is proposed to be
wrapped with metal of the same color
as the existing trim paint.
(e) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building.
They shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines.
For one-story structures, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be
8 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. For structures of two (2) or more stories, the
minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 5 on 12 and 12 on 12,
respectively. Only a small portion of roof area may be flat provided it is not visible
from the public street, existing or planned, or does not detract from the overall design
and harmony of the building. Where portions of a roof are flat, architectural elements
such as cornices and parapets shall be included to improve the appearance and
provide interest. Large, low -slope (i.e., less than 5 on 12) gable forms are
discouraged.
No changes to the existing roof are proposed.
(fJ Orient buildings to the pubilc street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that
relates the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks,
present an inviting street front and promote traditional street patterns.
The building is existing and already
oriented to the public street.
\dre\lea ry\siding.srp. doc
337 Dorset Street
Design Review Application DR-03-02
DRC April 28, 2003
Page 4 of 4
(g) Conceal rooftop devicas. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be
used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to
minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure.
This criterion is not relevant to the current proposal.
(h) Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should
consider solar energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun's energy
during the winter and providing shade during the summer.
This criterion is not relevant to the current proposal.
RECOINMENDAI TION
Staff reccmgnends Ma9the Dezign Review Commiffee recommend approval by they
Daqj(azlcpmerRavis?,v Board of design review appficadonIRDR-03-02 candifianal upon
&e appIlic.ing zcrzp„"'t?G and an dzda kundztgon Jr, cu'rTGnV"
Y
peeling.
\drcXIeary\siding.srp.doc
Permit Murnber DR- 0 3 - o2
CITY OF SOUTH BURLE14GTON
APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW
All information requested on -this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested
information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application
being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review
Board.
1) Approval is being sought for (check all that apply):
2/ Design Plan Approval
0 Sign Design Approval
2) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fags#)
Z 3
3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax 4)
4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fim., ff)
5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS:
— 3 3 7 Dvn;ct.
6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 4 QS,- 2C2 0 0 j-' 3 '7 1�_
7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Provide a brief description of the improvement. or modification for which design review approvat is
being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and
height.
- Color A If,; /0/11 11 V9 1S1' n C 36dr 2Y
The information listed on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. Five
(5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of an required plans and drawings (e.g., site
plan, building elevations, sip details) must be submitted.
I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is
accurate to the best of my knowledge,
--
Do not write below this line
DATE OF SUBMSSION: 4 -// -f /o 3
I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be:
A?,-, -COTPlete 11 Incomplete
"IV / f , /:I/ A /I
Zoning or
IMMUng
DESIGN REVIEW
The information listed below must be submitted along with an application for design review. Five (5)
regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g.,site plan,
building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. Failure to provide the following information Will
result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee
and Development Review Board.
Design Plan Approval
o One or more current photographs of the property showing the present condition
o A site plan of the property in accordance with Section 26. 10 of the Zoning Regulations.
c Building elevations, drawn to scale, showing all sides of the building including:
® architectural details
® exterior equipment located on the roof, walls, and ground
building height
existing and proposed grading
color, type and texture of building material
doors
® siding cornices
* entablatures
roofing material
moldings and trim
window details including panes of glass, dimensions, shutters, lintels and awnings
details (cut sheets) of all proposed exterior lights
Sign Design Approval
o Plans (drawn to scale) and specifications showing the size, dimensions and color of the sign and
its various parts, the style of letter, material of which the sip is to be constructed, and method of
attachment to the building or in the ground.
o Color sketch of the sign and building as they would appear in relation to each other.
o Statement as to method of illumination -and intensity of the sign.
o A/laster signage plan containing the following:
an accurate site plan of the property shoiA4ng the location of buildings, parking, lets,
driveways and landscaped areas.
E3 computations of the maximum area, number, and height of signs, by sign type (i.e.,
freestanding, wall, etc.), allowed on the property under the sign ordinance.
® computations of the area and height of each sign on the property, both existing signs to
remain and proposed new signs.
* xn accurate indication on the site )Ian of the proposed location of all signs on the
property, both existing signs to remain and proposed new signs.
19 standards for consistency among all signs on the property (existing and proposed).
j
NOTICE OF CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL
WHEREAS, Roberta A. Kiehl (hereinafter referred to as
"Applicant") is the record owner of property commonly known
and designated as 337 Dorset Street located in the City of
South Burlington; and
WHEREAS, On July 11, 1989 Applicant received approval
from the Planning Commission for the City of South Burlington
for the conversion of an existing house into a professional
office building on the above -mentioned property; and
WHEREAS, the professional office building project
approved by the South Burlington Planning Commission is
specifically shown on a plan entitled "Site Plan for
Professional Office for Roberta A. Kiehl" prepared by Palmer
Company, Ltd., dated March 13, 1986 and last revised June 29,
1989; and
WHEREAS, the South Burlington Planning Commission
conditioned its approval on Applicant's agreement to provide
access to Dorset Street to certain adjoining properties; and
WHEREAS, the above -mentioned condition regarding access
is intended to apply not only to the Applicant but tc the
Applicant's heirs, successors and assigns;
NOW THEREFORE, the City of South Burlington and the
Applicant hereby record this Notice of Condition of Site Plan
Approval to establish said condition as a covenant and
requirement that shall run with and be binding upon the
property of Applicant unless and until modified by the South
Burlington Planning Commission:
McNEIL A MURRAY
multu NOTOM, Y[AMOIiT "I
1
f
1. Applicant shall improve the property that is the
subject of this Notice, commonly referred to as 337 Dorset
Street, in accordance with the above -referenced approved site
plan.
2. The City of South Burlington acting through its
Zoning Administrator, Planning Commission, Zoning Board of
Adjustment or their designate or successors, may require the
owners of properties adjoining the Applicant's property,
commonly known and designated as 333 Dorset Street, and
341 Dorset Street to utilize the curb cut located on
Applicant's property as the sole and exclusive means of access
to their properties from Dorset Street. If the City of South
Burlington elects to impose such a condition on the owners of
333 or 341 Dorset Street, it shall require said property
owners to construct at their expense any driveway or other
improvements necessary to accomplish said access arrangement
and share an appropriate portion of the expense of maintaining
the shared driveway access to Dorset Street.
Dated at South Burlington, Vermont, this day of
Witness
Witness
i
Witn sue;
Witness
1989.
City of South Burlington
Planning Commission
Roberta A. Kiehl, Applicant
E
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
FAX 658-4748
PLANNER
658-7955
March 15, 1993
Roberta Kiehl
Dorset Mobil Home Brokers
337 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
Re: Amend Condition
Dear Ms. Kiehl:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed please find a copy of the January 26, 1993 Planning
Commission meeting minutes. Please note the condition of approval.
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
S' c rely
J Weith,
City Planner
1 Encl
JW/mcp
PLANNING COMMISSION 26 JANUARY 1993
The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on
Tuesday, 26 January 1993, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room,
City Hall, 575 Dorset St.
Members Present:
William Burgess, Chairman; Catherine Peacock, David Austin, Terry
Sheahan, Mary -Barbara Maher, Mac Teeson, William Craig
Also Present:
Joe Weith, City Planner; Sandy Greiner, Free Press; Sheila Mc-
Intyre, Richard Bushnell, Douglas Fitzpatrick, Roger Dickinson,
Chip Ward, Robert Kiehl, Ernest Pomerleau, David White, Chris
Dunn, John Steele, Lance Llewellyn, John Larkin, Greg Rabideau,
Pat Leclair, Brenda Raleigh
1. Other Business:
a. Mr. Burgess noted he got a call from the City Manager
regarding Certificates of Occupancy. Mr. Hafter said the problem
is one of site work not being done and said that in the future
conditional C of O's will be issued where landscaping is a
question but it would be a requirement that all building stip-
ulations be complied with. They will be stringent to see that
everything was built according to plan.
2. Minutes of 8 February 1992:
It was noted on p. 7, paragraph 3, it should read "the Old Farm
Road.".
Mrs. Maher moved to approve the Minutes of 8 February as amended.
Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion passed 6-0 with Mr. Craig
abstaining.
3. REquest of Roberta Kiehl to amend a condition of approval for
an office use at 337 Dorset St. which requires the parking lot to
be paved by the end of 1992 construction season:
Ms. Kiehl noted this is part of the Dorset St. project which is
not yet done. Members had no problem granting an extension.
Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the request of
Roberta Kiehl to amend conditon of #2 of the 7/11/89_approval for
an office use at 337 Dorset St. and which was subsequent
amended on 10/8/91, to read as follows: "Due to potential im acts
of dust from a ravel arkin lot on adjoining residential uses
the applicant shall pave__the_parking_prior to completion of the
Dorset Street widening project."
Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403
FAX 658-4748
PLANNER
658-7955
February 25, 1993
Roberta Kiehl
Dorset Mobile Home Brokers
337 Dorset street
South Bur] naton, Vermont 09403
Re: Amend Condition
Dear Ms. Kiehl:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on
the above referenced project. Please note the condition of
approval.
If you have any questions, please %�e
me a call.
cerel
Y.
J e Weith,
City Planner
1 Encl
JW/mcp
.��
r�
r v.
~_
MOTION OF APPROVAL
KIEHL
I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the request
of Roberta Kiehl to amend condition #2 of the 7/11/89 approval for
an office use at 337 Dorset Street, and which was subsequently
amended on 10/8/91, to read as follows: "Due to potential impacts
of dust from a gravel parking lot on adjoining residential uses,
the applicant shall pave the parking prior to completion of the
Dorset Street widening project."
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: Joe Weith, City Planner
Re: January 26, 1993 agenda items
Date: January 22, 1993
3)
ROBERTA KIEHL - AMEND PREVIOUS CONDITION - 337 DORSET STREET
The applicant received site plan approval from the Planning
Commission on July 11, 1989 (minutes enclosed) to convert a single
family dwelling to an office. One of the conditions of approval
required the applicant to pave the parking lot by the end of the
1991 construction season which was the then estimated completion
date of the Dorset Street project. On October 8, 1991 (minutes
enclosed) the Planning Commission amended this condition to pave
the parking lot by the end of the 1992 construction season due to
the delayed Dorset Street project.
Apparently, the State agreed to pave the parking lot as part of the
agreement to sell the strip of land needed for widening. Since the
Dorset Street project is not yet complete, this paving has not been
completed, The applicant is now requesting that this condition be
amended to require the paving by the end of the 1993 construction
season. It is anticipated that the Dorset Street project will be
completed by this time. Staff recommends that the timing of paving
be tied to the completion of Dorset Street.
4)
EUGENE WARD - OFFICE ADDITION - SITE PLAN
This project consists of the construction of a 1,483 square foot
addition to an existing 1,760 square foot professional office.
This use was originally approved by the Planning Commission on
4/22/86 (minutes enclosed).
This property located at 3069 Williston Road lies within the I-C
District. This property is bounded on the east by a single family
dwelling and a mixed -use commercial building, on the west and south
by a single family dwelling owned by the applicant and on the north
by Williston Road.
Access/circulation: Access is via one (1) 20 foot curb cut on
Williston Road which will remain unchanged.
Circulation is adequate.
1
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
FAX 658-4748
PLANNER
658-7955
January 22, 1993
Roberta Kiehl
Dorset Mobile Home Brokers
337 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
Re: Amend Condition
Dear Ms. Kiehl:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission
meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure
someone is present on Tuesday, January 26, 1993 at 7:30 P.M. to
represent your request.
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
S' erely,
oe Weith,
City Planner
Encls
JW/mcp
PLANNING COMMISSION
8 October 1991
Page 3
within some specified period of time if they can work out an arrangement
satisfactory to the Planning Commission and Mr. Farrell and all of the owners
of property down there, that we would consider leaving that bank standing.
Mr. Craig stated that when we contact them, we should tell the., L': crar._-
ing theq an extension, it is not an approval for something that they might
come in for in the future.
Mr. Weith said that he will warn it to consider a request for a one- year -ex-
tension on that condition.
Mr. Burgess said to make sure that that is all that gets warned and this is
not a reintroduction of anything else that HeathCo. would like to do.
d. Mr. Weith explained that next week we Will have a work session for the
Southeast Quadrant zoning and the Comprehensive Plan amendments. Another item
he added is to discuss the Central District 2 in our City Center and some of
the problems that our zoning is creating in terms of allowing a buildable area
for buildings along Dorset Street. We have had some people who want to do
something there but cannot because of the zoninq.
2. Minutes of August 6, 1991.
Ms. Pugh moved the Minutes of August 6, 1991 be approved as written. Ms.
Peacock seconded. Motion passed 6 to 0 with Mr. Sheahan abstaining.
3. Request of Roberta Kiehl to amend a condition of approval for an office
use at 337 Dorset Street which requires the parking lot to be paved by the end
of the 1991 construction season.
Mr. Burgess stated this is a request that has been approved by the Planning
Commission to convert a single-family dwelling into an office and the parking
lot had to be paved by the end of this constriction season. The applicant is
requesting to have this condition amended to deiay the paving as the state is
going to be paving the lot as part of the Dorset Street extension project.
Ms. Pugh asked if the other conditions have been meL. Mr. Weith replied yes.
Mr. Austin moved the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the request
of Roberta Kiehl to amend condition #2 of the 7i11/69 approval for an office
use at 337 Dorset Street to read as follows: "Due to potential impacts of
dust from a gravel parking lot on adjoining residential uses, the applicant
shall pave the parking lot by the end of the 1992 construction season.Mrs.
Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
4. Site Plan application ai 1.S_(:. iunding, inc. iur wtobiie heave sales and
financing use on a two (2) acre parcel, 2069 Williston Road.
PLANNING COMMISSION
11 JULY 1989
pace 5
Mr. Weith noted that changes suqqested at the last discussion had
been made. Expansion of any non -complying structure would require
conditional use review. Mr. Craiq asked if there is any problem
with reduced side yard setbacks. Mr. Weith said BOCA says it
complies providinq there are proper firewalls.
Mr. Schatz asked if the amendment covers the purchase of a
building and totally gutting and rebuilding. Mr. Weith said that
would still be as it is now, but it would make it easier to
conform.
Mr. Weith said the next step is to submit the amendment to the
City Council who will hold a public hearing. It must be approved
by the Council. Mr. Crowley said he felt the Commission had done
a very good job on this.
Mrs. Maher moved that the Planning Commission approve and siqn the
REsolution dated 7/11/89 concerning Queen City Park and further
that the Planning Commission approve the amendments to the South
Burliqnton Zoning Requlations to establish a Queen City Park
District, dated 6/21/89, and that these amendments be forwarded to
the City Council for their consideration and adoption. Mr.
Burqess seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
Mr. Craiq left the meetinq at this point.
7. Site Plan application of Roberta Kiehl for conversion of a
1,000 sq. ft. single family home to office use, 337 Dorset Street
Mr. Cau18 sited the property 150 ft. south of Brookwood Drive.
next to the insurance building. It is a one-story ranch, now a
sinqle family home. Access is on the north side of the house.
They propose to widen this to 20 ft. There would be 5 parking
spaces in back. The building would not be enlarged. All set-
backs are met. Access to the building would be from the rear.
Mr. Weith noted the City Center plan wants to allow connections of
rear parkinq lots. He told the applicant it would be a benefit to
the City if they would allow connections to other parking lots.
Mr. Weith also noted they are trying to minimize curb cuts, and it
would be beneficial to have the other 2 buildings access from this
drive when they are developed. He felt this would work easily
with the property to the north but wasn't sure about the one to
the south.
Mr. Caulo felt this was OK as long as the applicant was adequately
protected by the wording. They would definitely consider it.
PLANNING COMMISSION
11 JULY 1989
page 6
Mr. Belter raised the concern that the other buisnesses miqht take
up all of this applicant's parking. Mr. Jacob said there would be
a stipulation for the party to the north to have adequate parking.
Mr. Jacob felt that the proposed pines near the cedar hedge would
endanger the hedge. Other members agreed and felt the pines were
not necessary. Mrs. Maher felt the front of the building should
be spruced up.
Mr. Burto, the northern neighbor, felt it was OK to use the
building for offices. He had a problem with a gavel parking lot
because of dust. He also noted that people visiting the insurance
building have been parking in his driveway. He wanted to see some
privacy fencing. Mr. Jacob noted the gavel is temporary until the
road is upgraded. Mrs. Maher didn't feel it was too much to ask
for a stockagde fence on the property line between the properties.
Members aqreed on a 6 ft. stockaqe fence from the beqinning of the
house to the back of the property. Mr. Burto also asked about
lightinq. Mr. Caulo said the only lighting will be on the
signage. There will be none in the parking area. Mr. Weith felt
a 2-year limit could be put on the gravel lot reqardless of the
status of Dorset St. Members agreed.
Mr. Weith advised the Commission that by making this a Commercial
use, it becomes a non -conforming structure.
Mrs. Maher moved the Planninq Commission approve the site plan ap-
plication of Roberta Kiehl for conversion of a 1,000 sq. ft.
single-family home to office use as depicted on a plan entitled
"Site Plan, Professional Office for Roberta A. Kiehl," prepared by
Harry Petrovs and dated 3/13/86, last revised 6/29/89, with the
folowing stipulations;
1.`The applicant has expressed that she fully understands that as
long as the building is used for commercial purposes, the existing
structure will be non-conforminq since it is only 62 ft. from the
residential zone to the west (Section 19.104(c) of the South Bur-
lington Zoning Regulations). Therefore, as long as commercial
uses exist within the structure, the structure and property will
be subject to the provisions for non-conforminq structures set
forth in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations.
2. Due to potential impacts of dust from a gravel parking lot on
adjoining residential uses, the applicant shall pave the parking
lot by the end of the 1991 construction season.
PLANNING COMMISSION
11 JULY 1989
paqe 7
3. Based on the expressed representation of the applicant, the ap-
plicant shall allow connections between her parking lot and
parking lots on adjoininq properties as these properties develop.
4. The applicant shall record an access agreement to provide
access to the adjoininq properties to the south and north. This
agreement shall be written by the City Attorney and reviewed and
approved by the applicant and shall be recorded prior to permit.
5. A 6 foot high stockade fence shall be installed along the north
property line from the front of the building to the back property
line. This shall be shown on the plan.
6. Revised plan addressing stipulation #5 shall be submitted to
the City Planner for approval prior to permit.
7. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this
approval is null and void.
Mr. Belter seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
As there was no further business to come before the Commission,
the meetinq adjourned at 9:50 pm.
Clerk
January 12, 1993
Planning Commission
City of So. Burlington
575 Dorset Street
So. Burlington, Vermont 05403
Attn: Ray Belair
Dear Ray:
It was decided by the Planning Commission that my driveway and parking lot
at 337 Dorset Street should be paved by the end of the construction season
of 1992. The State is paying for the paving as part of the package deal made
with the previous owner, Ron Muir, and the same condition was passed onto me.
obviously, the construction of. Dorset Street is not completed and I am asking
you to extend this condition to the end of the construction season of 1993.
In view of the fact that I have a shared driveway with Attorney Morewood's
office and this condition does not apply to him, I feel that my request is
is very reasonable.
Sincerely,
Roberta Kiehl
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403
FAX 658-4748
PLANNER
658-7955
December 7, 1992
Robert Kiehl
209 Lakewood Parkway
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: 337 Dorset Street, Condition of Site Plan Approval
Dear Ms. Kiehl:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
This is to bring to your attention to amended condition #2 of your
7/11/89 site plan approval. This condition was amended on 10/8/91
and requires that you pave your parking lot "by the end of the 1992
construction season".
This condition should be met as soon as possible as the
construction season is rapidly approaching closure. Failure to
comply with this condition may result in legal action by the City
of South Burlington and fines of up to $50 per day for each day the
violation continues. Please contact this office as soon as the
work is completed.
Another option may be to apply to the Commission to once again
amend the condition to require paving by the "end of the 1993
construction season. This may be justified since the completion of
the Dorset Street project has been delayed to fall, 1993.
If you have any questions, please give me a call.
Please contact this office soon to let us know how you wish to
proceed.
Since ly,
Raym nd J. Belair,
Zoning and Planning Assistant
RJB/mcp
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403
FAX 658-4748
PLANNER
658-7955
January 1 t.4 , .19 9 2
Ms. Roberta Kiehl
209 Lakewood Parkway
Burlington, Ver-rtiont 054.01
Re: 337 Dorset. St_..reet.
Dear. M,-:. Kiehl.:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed please final a cope of ti-e October 8, 1991.Planning
Cc,mmission meeting minutes. it you have any questions, please
give me a call.
.l.y
V4 ,
oe We.:"_...
City Planner
:TW,Irncp
PLANNER
658-7955
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
FAX 658-4748
November 6, 1991
Ms. Roberta Kiehl
209 Lakewood Parkway
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Amend Conditions of Approval, 337 Dorset Street
Dear Ms. Kiehl:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision
on the above referenced request. If you have any questions,
please give me a call.
Si er ly
1
s I� I
1
J Weith,
C ty Planner
1 Encl
JW/mcp
10/8/91
JW
MOTION OF APPROVAL
I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the
request of Roberta Kiehl to amend condition #2 of the 7/11/89
approval for an office use at 337 Dorset Street to -ate
!7, I1_
I D u t 4-6 p O e.. to, ( I'rk (o P. c l's off' Otv- l rrO *K A. G rk ve_ l
(a r k 1' of 0., cJjc i n l r reps t At-i-AA ! u sc.5, 4-kc
ertGf
M E M O R a u 2 u M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: Joe Weith, City Planner
Re: October 8, 1991 agenda items
Date: October 4, 1991
3) ROBERTA KIEHL = MEND PREVIOUS CONDITION - 337 OD RSET STREET
The applicant received site plan approval from the Planning
Commission on July 11, 1989 (minutes enclosed) to convert a
single-family dwelling to an office. One of the conditions of
approval required the applicant to pave the parking lot by the
end of the 1991 construction season. The applicant is requesting
that the Planning Commission amend this condition and delay the
implementation of the requirement until the end of the 1992
construction season since the State will be paving the lot as
part of the Dorset Street project. Staff recommends approving
the request.
4) TSC FUNDING, INC. - MOBILE HOME SALES - 2069 WILLISTON ROAD
This project consists of using an undeveloped lot for a mobile
home sales office and display lot for four (4) mobile homes and a
financing office in a separate building. This proposal involves
two (2) principal buildings on the same lot which under Section
19.65 can only be allowed under a Planned Unit Development.
Since this lot does not have the required four (4) acre minimum
for a PUD, a variance is being requested which will be heard by
the Zoning Board of Adjustment on October 7th. The proposed
mobile home sales use is not permitted in this district so a use
variance is also being requested. This property is located at
2069 Williston Road and is within the Commercial 1' District. It
is bounded on the west by Dr. Peet's Chiropractic Office, on the
east by Rent -A -Wreck, on the south by a vacant lot and Woodland
Place and on the north by Williston Road.
Access/Circulation: Access is via a 35 foot curb cut and shared
access drive with the property to the east. A shared access
agreement is in effect and a copy of this agreement is recorded
in the City land records. The site will have two (2) connections
to this shared access drive thereby creating a circular drive
through the site. This circular design is preferred by the Fire
Chief.
Circulation pattern is acceptable.
1
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
FAX 658-4748
PLANNER
658-7955
October 4, 1991
Roberta Kiehl
.A9 Lakewood P'-:trlWay
Bux-11-n-mtcyn, \T—mont- 05401
Re: Amenc i Conditions of Approval, 337 D(-.)r--,et. Street
'ecil-
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
is thF- agend..--i far next Tuesday's Planning Commission
ry:eet-ing and rr!.7 -comments to the Planning Commission. P I e's e b, -
-i!re someone i- present on Tuesdzty, October 8, 1991 at 7:30 P.M.
re -quest.
have an, j-dease give rile a cali.
C cer
I . (Z
j5e Weith,
City Planner
En c -1 -
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
PLANNER
658-7955
September 4, 1991
Roberta Kiehl
209 Lakewood Parkway
Burlington, Vermont 05401_
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Re: 337 Dorset Street - Conditions of Site Plan Approval
Dear Ms. Kiehl:
The purpose of this letter is to bring to your attention a condi-
tion of approval setforth by the South Burlington Planning Com-
mis when they ippi_-oved your office at. 1177 Doi: -et. St.reF t.
This condition requires that you pave the parking lot by the end
of the 1991 construction season (see enclosed Findings of Fact).
Any other conditions imposed by the Planning Commission must also
be met.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
cerely,
oe Weith,
City Planner
1 Encl
JW/mcp
7t
ke C.'t-
e� o.4
TAll-
nil
NOTICE OF CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL
WHEREAS, Roberta A. Kiehl (hereinafter referred to as
"Applicant") is the record owner of property commonly known
and designated as 337 Dorset Street located in the City of
South Burlington; and
WHEREAS, On July 11, 1989 Applicant received approval
from the Planning Commission for the City of South Burlington
for the conversion of an existing house into a professional
office building on the above -mentioned property; and
WHEREAS, the professional office building project
approved by the South Burlington Planning Commission is
specifically shown on a plan entitled "Site Plan for
Professional Office for Roberta A. Kiehl" prepared by Palmer
Company, Ltd., dated March 13, 1986 and last revised June 29,
1989; and
WHEREAS, the South Burlington Planning Commission
conditioned its approval on Applicant's agreement to provide
access to Dorset Street to certain adjoining properties; and
WHEREAS, the above -mentioned condition regarding access
is intended to apply not only to the Applicant but tc t:ie
Applicant's heirs, successors and assigns;
NOW THEREFORE, the City of South Burlington and the
Applicant hereby record this Notice of Condition of Site Plan
Approval to establish said condition as a covenant and
requirement that shall run with and be binding upon the
property of Applicant unless and until modified by the South
Burlington Planning Commission:
McNEIL do MURRAY
SURLINOTON, VZRMONT"I
1
R
1. Applicant shall improve the property that is the
subject of this Notice, commonly referred to as 337 Dorset
Street, in accordance with the above -referenced approved site
plan.
2. The City of South Burlington acting through its
Zoning Administrator, Planning Commission, Zoning Board of
Adjustment or their designate or successors, may require the
owners of properties adjoining the Applicant's property,
commonly known and designated as 333 Dorset Street, and
341 Dorset Street to utilize the curb cut located on
Applicant's property as the sole and exclusive means of access
to their properties from Dorset Street. If the City of South
Burlington elects to impose such a condition on the owners of
333 or 341 Dorset Street, it shall require said property
owners to construct at their expense any driveway or other
improvements necessary to accomplish said access arrangement
and share an appropriate portion of the expense of maintaining
the shared driveway access to Dorset Street.
Dated at South Burlington, Vermont, this day of
Witness
Witness
i.
Witn ss'
Witness
, 1989.
City of South Burlington
Planning Commission
Roberta A. Kiehl, Applicant
11
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
PLANNER
658-7955
February 8, 1990
Ms. Roberta Kiehl
Lakewood Parkway
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Ms. Kiehl:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed please find your copy of Findings of Fact. If you have
any questions please call me.
Sincerely,
Z9���
Joe Weith,
City Planner
JW/mcp
1 Encl
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
PLANNER
658-7955
July 7, 1989
Ms. Roberta Kiehl
Lakewood Parkway
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Proposed Office Use, 337 Dorset Street
Dear Ms. Kiehl:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission
meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Also
enclosed are Bill Szymanski's comments.
Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, 7/11/89 at
8:30 P.M. to represent your request.
Sincerely,
11
;�/O,- -co -CA4
Joe Weith,
City Planner
Encls
cc: Mr. Dave Kelly
JW/mcp
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
PLANNER
658-7955
August 21, 1989
Mr. Dave Kelly
Highpoint Realty
1 Roosevelt Highway
Colchester, Vermont 05468
Re: Office Use, 337 Dorset Street
Dear Mr. Kelly:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed are the 7/18/89 Planning Commission meeting minutes.
Please meet the stipulations contained in the approval motion
before applying for a building permit. Please call if you have
any questions.
ncerely,
✓� ��"`
Joe Weith,
City Planner
1 Encl
cc: Roberta Kiehl
JW/mcp
Memorandum - Planning
July 11, 1989 agenda -items
July 7, 1989
Page 3
4) QUEEN CITY PARK ZONING DISTRICT. PUBLIC HEARING
Enclosed is the proposed amendment to the South Burlington Zoning
Regulations to establish a Q.C.P. District. As discussed at
previous meetings, City Attorney, Steve Stitzel, recommended that
the Planning Commission adopt a resolution which clearly states
why the Planning Commission feels that the Q.C.P. neighborhood is
unique and the existing zoning is inappropriate. I will have a
resolution available at Tuesday's meeting.
5) REAL ESTATE OFFICE. CENTRAL DISTRICT 3. 337 DORSET STREET
Roberta A. Kiehl,, as agent for Ronald & Mary Muir, proposes to
convert an existing, 1,000 square foot, one story single-family
dwelling to office use. Such use is a permitted use in the newly
established Central District 3 zone.
The property is bounded on the east by Dorset Street, and other-
wise surrounded by residences.
Access: Access is shown via a 20' wide curb cut on Dorset
Street. This does not conform to the Dorset Street widening
plans which propose a 12 foot wide access for this property. I
feel a 20 foot wide access is more appropriate for a commercial
use. I will consult with Mike Munson to see if the State can
accommodate a 20 foot wide drive.
The Planning Commission should start thinking about future access
to these properties. It would be beneficial to the City if this
one access could be used to serve all three lots when they all
convert to commercial use especially since a primary goal of the
city center plan is to share access and minimize curb cuts. This
would require a shared access agreement.
Circulation: Circulation is limited to one side (northern) and
the rear (western) parts of the lot. The main building entrance
will be redirected to the rear and no longer face Dorset Street.
The parking lot will be in the rear. This is consistent with the
goals of the City Center Plan. Section 1.70 of the City Center
Zone requires rear parking lots to allow for access to adjoining
properties. The applicant should be aware of this for future
circulation purposes.
Parking: Aisle and access widths are acceptable. The project
requires 4 parking spaces and 5 spaces are proposed.
Coverage: All coverage requirements of the district are met.
Memorandum - Planning
3
July 11,1989 agenda items
July 7, 1989 '
Page 4
Setbacks: Front, rear and side yard setbacks are met. The
building does not meet the required 65 foot setback of commercial
uses from residential zones. The building is 62 feet from the
residential zone to the west. The Zoning Administrator said
that since this is a pre-existing structure and no expansion to
the building will be done, and since office is a permitted use,
no variance is required.
It is important that the applicant realize that by using this
building for commercial use, the structure will become non -con-
forming.
Density: Maximum floor area ratio is 0.5. Proposed F.A.R.
is .11.
Landscaping: Minimal alterations to the existing structure
($500) are planned, establishing a required landscape value of
only $15.00. the existing 15' cedar hedge provides an excellent
screen, however, it is not on the applicant's property. I recom-
mend that a row of pine trees be planted along the west property
line on the applicant's property. This would better assure that
a proper screen is maintained.
Existing plantings to remain include lilac, rhododendron and a
maple cluster. The front area is well landscaped with mature
cedar hedges, flowering bushes and large pine tree.
Traffic: The site is located in Zone 6 of the Traffic Overlay
District. Based on the lot size of 8890 square feet, peak hour
trip ends permitted are 10. I.T.E. estimates 2 peak hour trip
ends for this use.
Other: See Bill Szymanski's comments.
6) RECREATION PATH LAND ACQUISITION POLICY
Bill Craig has proposed that the Planning Commission adopt a
policy to be followed by the Commission, Council and Recreation
Path Committee when acquiring land for the proposed recreation
path. Some initial thoughts of things which I feel the policy
should address include the following:
1. Size of easement - 15 to 20 feet.
2. Additional temporary construction easements.
3. Notification of all property owners within 100 feet of
the proposed easement.
4. Review and recording process.
If you have any other ideas, please share them at Tuesday's
meeting. The Recreation Path Committee is also compiling a
4
C ITY OF S0U'll1 13Ult1, I NGTON
S I TF. PkAN APPLICATION
1) OWNER OF HFCORU lname, ad(Jr•ess, phone #1 Ronald & Mary_Muir
17 Mayfair St., So. Burlington -
658-3029
2) APPLICANT ( name, address, phone #) Roberta Kiehli_______
Lakewood Parkway, Burlington, VT. _ 658-0149______.
3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #)---, Dave KellY._ __--_
HighPoint Realty,Colchester, VT. 655-4700
4). PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 337 Dorset St —,-So. Bur li -g o-n,_VT.__
5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable)
6) PROPOSED USE(S) Real Estate Office
7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units,
maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor)1,000 sq.ft.
1, single story, 2 (1st & lower level 770 sq.ft., 230 sq.ft.)
8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 2-3
9).LOT COVERAGE: building %; landscaped areas�%
building, parking, outside storage%
10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings ; 500 , Landscaping 500
Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) ! /q0O #A140i 2u4j
Drive & Darki
11 ) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE:
12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out)2-3 cars/3 times a day
Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours:
Monday through Friday
11-12 noon 1 _; 12-1p.m. 1 1-2 P.M. 1 2-3 p.m._ 1 _
3-4 p.m.-___l--; 4-5 p.m. 1 5-6 p.m. 1_; 6-7 p.m. 1 _
13) PEAK }LOURS OF OPERATION: 9-5
14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: M-F
-
6/29/89-------------- __.'_�--_ -
DATE OF SUBMISSION SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
7/11/89
DATE OF HEARING
I
PLEASE SUBMIT I� iVE COPIES AND ONE REDUCED COPY (8 1 /2 X 11 OR 8
1/2 X 14) OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
Lot drawn to scale (20 foot scale if possible).
Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing
buildings, existing landscaping.
Existing and proposed curbcuts, pavement, walkways.
Proposed landscaping plan (number, variety and size) equal to of
greater than the required amount in the Zoning Regulations.
Number and location of Parking Spaces: (9' x 18') with 22 or 21
foot aisles as required.
Number and location of compact car spaces. (This requires
separate Planning Commission approval).
Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. (13 feet
by 20 feet in size, one per every fifty spaces).
Location of septic tanks (if applicable).
Location of any easements.
Lot coverage information: Building footprint, building, parking
and outside storage, and landscaped areas.
Location of site (Street # and lot #).
North arrow.
Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date.
-2-
_PERCENTAGE OIL 0 COWR4GE
sa Fr
LOTSIZE 8890
A&WIS STATERO. JW I226
USEO REMAINING Xeg /00
SLCUM6 768 /O
ACCESS /280 /7
PARKING AREA 2946 3/
Q�
F
OTAL CO✓ERAC.E a ,fix
PAVID L M&M-EA 6EeTEAU
1-hWF CaeAVE.�. Oen/E-vJAY
8 d
V. LI S R L5%.
M 7
R -
ILOU qPG
6'-�'
� OT O
OUAlO
f YI'5rnLiC&,
Po7r 6 Ra PElIrF
/
6E P.E6o TO ..zw ..v
1 /
✓
P¢OPF75E.D
9
P
veAVEI- \
O
N
5EWE2
O
�1
i
1
McEMOv>Ea ✓
,F
WDD
p¢ppOSED
d
O g`
PAZY-1 4b
vA2l.wPi
53
0
�4A �
�
zauc.E
�•,
� ��
2 R
Yo
Exl�nw
+t 537 >"e.0 Dt,
It' x 18'
P¢OPtYJEA
0
EXPAUy10�-J
Wo
�
-
/
Ex15Tw6
-
PIC.r.Br
I/
TO 'L.F.r.JUEDY
Ieou F1PE
9!a WHITE i
pell/E.
-uulC.
GI).JE '
AJ I TE. Pt,A I.J
10' TO C4?6E R.O.W.
I
(IZO' TO Evc-of- 2.0.W. PE.R
OLD HOAC- R1��� �/
\ m
To
FO¢ ne.OFE�S QU4L OFFICE
TO
1e
.'70,
T' DAR-
170L*-'rl
ROBERT,4 A. K/EHL
, II
MO"iE5
61CHA¢0 4 Wrw
"-
... .
I. 4,EFEJL TO A PwU
6•C HOob ci AH.Gr+. LAUCMAW
6'11 pO2-r-6T 61V.FfT
9AQIITI..E.D `CAE..IDAL-E
A4R-IL:' JAU. W,5, VIbl 9470
D21Vf_WA`(
SO. OUWJ�iC To1.I,VE¢MotiT
2EC.O4Zb6D IU J.11
P. L91 .
FIpy
sty t'ALML+N COMPANY, LTD.
fi(). IIIn1l�N(i'RIN. VWU -uMlll
T C* lZ7nF`C -T41 KITE
V V
P1.41.1 Yo 6E w�Ilo IF
AU.Ue-A-rw- G'02. PL-AWKII"C, PURPOyEh "a'°'
AI.10 I> L10T 'fD C.OU5T2USO Ab A 4��REA�
DATE: MAPGN /3 /4 BYo 6/29iB9
G'ti'0
SCALE: l' < i0'
DOLJ"VAJ2'-( M.AG
SO
/
SURVEYED: M. L.I400 ✓ N. oETeO✓S JOB
M
/ �i ✓. (,�i�+M
orUwN: HA¢e.•/ GE73t0N5
CHFCNED: /v(geK WAe,9
RESK
a - ow
MICHAELj.MUNSON, PH.D. PLANNING CONSULTANT
Burlington Plann�ny Lumm�ss�
From: Michael J. Munson
Dorset Street Project Coordinator
Subject: Comments regarding the site plan for the Muir parcel
�
I met yesterday with Dave Kelly of High Point Realty to discuss a
proposed site plan for the Muir property at 337 Dorset Street.
As I understand it, he ID to convert what is presently
a residential property into a professional office. Included in
that proposal is the widening of the existing driveway and
provision (::I a paved parking area in the rear yard.
I see no conflicts between this proposal and the plans for
reconstructing Dorset Street except for the width of the
driveway. Since this is presently a residential property, only a
12 foot curb cut is shown on the plans. If it is converted to an
office structure, the 20 foot driveway is appropriate, and the
plans can be revised accordingly. Therefore, I request that the
Planning Commission, if it approves the site plan, send me a copy
of the approved plan so that I can ensure that the road plans are
revised accordingly.
There is one other point I would like to make. As part of the
compensation agreement negotiated between the Agency of
Transportation and the present owner c.3 the property, it has been
agreed that the Dorset Street project will construct a paved turn
around area in the rear yard--arectangular area approximately 45'
by 40'. This will be done as part of the road project. The
proposed site plan calls for a parking area somewhat larger than
that, but in the same location. It makes sense that the
applicant not be required to pave the area which the project will
pave. In order to prevent such duplication, I suggest that the
Commission consider allowing the applicant to provide a gravel
parking area until such time as the road project paves its
portion, at which time the applicant should be required to pave
the remainder. If all goes well, I expect that this will occur
in 1991.
If you have any questions about this, don't hesitate to call on
me.
7/11/89
JW
MOTION OF APPROVAL
I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site
plan application of Roberta Kiehl for conversion of a 1,000
square foot single-family home to office use as depicted on a
plan entitled "Site Plan, Professional Office for Roberta A.
Kiehl," prepared by Harry Petrovs and dated 3/13/flO, last revised
6/29/89, with the following stipulations:
1. The lan shall e revise to show a rod 'f pines along the
r ar plop rty line order o pr?Pe .y ma nt in a..Sc�een }�etweeri
t /ede
f' e usq'and resident al xses to e est.r'�` Te app]„i�t�ant
s o t a 3' year lar�'dscaping `bon p or tirmit' in an amount
t e5pixined bye:t e City Planne
j The applicant has expressed that she fully understands that
as long as the building is used for commercial purposes, the
existing structure will be non -conforming since it is only 62
feet from the residential zone to the west (Section 19.104(c) of
the South Burlington Zoning Regulations). Therefore, as long as
commercial uses exist within the structure, the structure and
property will be subject to the provisions for non -conforming
structures setforth in the South url'ngton Zoning Regulations.
�. D e to potential impacts of dust from a gravel parking lot on
adjo ning residential uses, the applicant shall pave the parking
lot a
? 4. Based upon the expressed representation of the applicant, the
applicant shall allow connections between her parking lot and
parking lots on adjoining properties as these properties develop.
17fd. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this
approval is null and void.
F].
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer
Re: July 11, 1989 agenda items
Date July 7, 1989
3) BLODGETT PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, HOLMES ROAD EXTENSION
1. Driveways shall have a depressed concrete curb.
2. Underground electric and telephone lines shall be outside of
the Holmes Road Extension right-of-way. Plans shall be submitted
showing these utility easements also the street lighting plan.
3. There should be more inlets for site drainage especially
between the units instead of all street drainage across driveways
and road.
4. Sidewalk's concrete shall be 5 inches thick and 8 inches at
driveways.
5) ROBERTA A. KIEHL. 337 DORSET STREET
1. The 20 foot driveway will not conform to the proposed widen-
ing plan for Dorset Street. The plans call for a 12 foot drive.
The 20 feet will work if it is shared with the adjacent property
to the north (Berteau).
2. Drainage shall be toward the westerly line and then southerly
where a swale exists.
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
PLANNER
658-7955
July 19, 1989
Mr. David Kelly
HighPoint Realty
1 Roosevelt Highway
Colchester, Vermont 05446
RE: Office Use, 337 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont
Dear Mr. Kelly:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
As you are well aware, the Planning Commission stipulated as a condition of
the approval for the above referenced project that the applicant record an
access easement/agreement for the adjoining properties to the north and south.
Enclosed is a draft "Notice of Conditions of Site Plan Approval" which the
City Attorney feels is the most appropriate method in which to meet the
stipulation mentioned above.
Please review the draft document and provide me with your comments. If
this document is acceptable to you, I will send you the original for the
applicant's signature and recording.
Sincerely;
` Joseph Weith
City Planner
JW/b
No Text
f
�� war t,.P.(�. I,� f�--.,.�„ 11 t._ y�.a_d.�!
tw&oy C'e �'-
3�l3 � d'7o ; rw 6/L9 l �9
04
7 Vef
0711- �
a V� 4�4-la` `� ` * I �� -��
6%11� a , (70 - , zl,,* �� = .10,07
O
/Vo 0�dthpk.A'&4 6 -
,w
A. -Of
Avoo dfvote dte4iL�s �e
ul M' e -S
McNEIL & MURRAY
BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
NOTICE OF CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL
WHEREAS, Roberta A. Kiehl (hereinafter referred to as
"Applicant") is the record owner of property commonly known
and designated as 337 Dorset Street located in the City of
South Burlington; and
WHEREAS, On July 11, 1989 Applicant received approval
from the Planning Commission for the City of South Burlington
for the conversion of an existing house into a professional
office building on the above -mentioned property; and
WHEREAS, the professional office building project
approved by the South Burlington Planning Commission is
specifically shown on a plan entitled "Site Plan for
Professional Office for Roberta A. Kiehl" prepared by Palmer
Company, Ltd., dated March 13, 1986 and last revised June 29,
1989; and
WHEREAS, the South Burlington Planning Commission
conditioned its approval on Applicant's agreement to provide
access to Dorset Street to certain adjoining properties; and
WHEREAS, the above -mentioned condition regarding access
is intended to apply not only to the Applicant but to the
Applicant's heirs, successors and assigns;
NOW THEREFORE, the City of South Burlington and the
Applicant hereby record this Notice of Condition of Site Plan
Approval to establish said condition as a covenant and
requirement that shall run with and be binding upon the
property of Applicant unless and until modified by the South
Burlington Planning Commission:
1
1. Applicant shall improve the property that is the
subject of this Notice, commonly referred to as 337 Dorset
Street, in accordance with the above -referenced approved site
plan.
2. The City of South Burlington acting through its
Zoning Administrator, Planning Commission, Zoning Board of
Adjustment or their designate or successors, may require the
owners of properties adjoining the Applicant's property,
commonly known and designated as 333 Dorset Street, and
341 Dorset Street to utilize the curb cut located on
Applicant's property as the sole and exclusive means of access
to their properties from Dorset Street. If the City of South
Burlington elects to impose such a condition on the owners of
333 or 341 Dorset Street, it shall require said property
owners to construct at their expense any driveway or other
improvements necessary to accomplish said access arrangement
and share an appropriate portion of the expense of maintaining
the shared driveway access to Dorset Street.
Dated at South Burlington, Vermont, this day of
, 1989.
Witness
Witness
Witness
Witness
City of South Burlington
Planning Commission
Roberta A. Kiehl, Applicant
r
MUIR
Real Estate
Corner
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: Ronald Muir
Re: Agent for Site Plan Review
Date: June 26, 1989
RFALTOP'
(802) 658-1788
33 Patchen Road
So. Burlington, VT 05403
Please be notified that Roberta Kiehl has my permission to
represent me as agent for 337 Dorset Street, South Burlington,
in the application process for site plan approval and change
of use to a professional office.
1WV-1-11
Ron Muir
No Text
Ar
- ----- --- -'" " A----
u
P
p
1 � I
4i f
\C 1