Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0337 Dorset StreetCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & 'ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Design Review Committee FROM: Janet M. Hurley, Associate Planner DATE: April 22, 2003 COPY TO: James Leary, Applicant Miles Rice Design Review Application DR-03-02 337 Dorset Street The applicant is requesting approval to remove the existing siding and cover the existing trim at 337 Dorset Street and replace or cover it with vinyl siding and metal trim of the same color. The subject property falls within Design District 3 of the City Center Design Review (CCDR) Overlay District. Pursuant to Section 24.10 of the Zoning Regulations and Section 11.01(C)(3) of the proposed Land Development Regulations, buildings in this district should have pitched roofs, consist of wood, vinyl, brick, or stone materials, and contain natural or subdued colors. Pursuant to Section 24.201(b) of the Zoning Regulations and Section 11.01(D)(1)(e) of the proposed Land Development Regulations, the addition or removal of materials to or from the exterior shall be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB). Design plans for properties within Design District 3 shall comply with the following design criteria. - (a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of major elements; and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All sides of a building shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material, window treatments, architectural accents, cornice/parapet design, etc. The design of a building should consider the design features of other structures in the area so as not to be harshly discordant with other nearby buildings. The building design is not changing as a result of this proposal. Existing wood clapboards will be replaced by vinyl of the same width and color. Existing wooden trim elements will be wrapped with metal of the same color. (b) Materials used. High quality, attractive materials shall be used on all buildings. Natural, indigenous materials of stone and masonry are highly encouraged, if not 337 Dorset Street Design Review Application DR-03-02 DRC April 28, 2003 Page 2 of 4 required. Natural, indigenous materials of stone, masonry and wood shall predominate. Synthetic materials such as vinyl siding may be used in place of wood provided it is of high quality and closely resembles wood clapboard/shingles. Other materials may be used as an architectural accent provided they are harmonious with the building and site. The foundation needs to be scraped and painted in places where paint is currently pealing. Staff believes the proposed vinyl siding and metal trim wrap are in keeping with this standard. However, staff notes that the foundation paint is currently pealing and should be scraped and replaced with fresh paint of the same color. (c) Colors and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be harmonious with the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby. Colors naturally occurring from building materials and other traditional, subdued colors are encouraged. More than three (3) predominant colors are discouraged. The building is primarily white with black window shutters and a subdued asphalt shingle roof. Texture is smooth. These features will not change as a result of the proposed residing. (d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment shall be a careful response to the buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The treatment of windows and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that gives necessary order and unity to the facade, yet avoids monotony. \dre\ eary\siding.srp.doc 337 Dorset Street Design Review Application DR-03-02 DRC April 28, 2003 Page 3 of 4 No new windows or doors are proposed. However, the existing wooden trim is proposed to be wrapped with metal of the same color as the existing trim paint. (e) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building. They shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines. For one-story structures, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 8 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. For structures of two (2) or more stories, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 5 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. Only a small portion of roof area maybe flat provided it is not visible from the public street, existing or planned, or does not detract from the overall design and harmony of the building. Where portions of a roof are flat, architectural elements such as comices and parapets shall be included to improve the appearance and provide interest. Large, low -slope (i.e., less than 5 on 12) gable forms are discouraged. No changes to the existing roof are proposed. (f) Orient buildings to the public street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that relates the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks, present an inviting street front and promote traditional street pattems. The building is existing and already oriented to the public street. AGF_Nt N M d \dreUeary\siding. srp.doc 337 Dorset Street Design Review Application DR-03-02 DRC April 28, 2003 Page 4 of 4 (g) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. This criterion is not relevant to the current proposal. (h) Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should consider solar energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun's energy during the winter and providing shade during the summer. This criterion is not relevant to the current proposal. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend approval by the Development Review Board of design review application #DR-03-02 conditional upon the applicant scraping and painting areas on the foundation where paint is currently pealing. \dreVearylsiding.srp.doc CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON ➢ EPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 May 9, 2003 James Leary 337 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Mr. Leary: DESIGN REVIEW #DR-03-02 337 DORSET STREET Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Decision for the above referenced project approved by the Development Review Board on May 9, 2003. Please contact this office to obtain a zoning permit for the approved work. If you have any questions, please call the Planning and Zoning office. Sincerely, Ja ' et M. Hurley Associate Planner /jmh Enclosure 1dreUeary\DR-03-02.cor. doc c CITY OF SOUTH BgJRI.INGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 TO: South Burlington Design Review Committee FROM. Janet M. Hurley, Associate Planner * DATE. April 22, 2003 COPY TO: James Leary, Applicant Miles Rice Design Review Application DR-03-02 337 Dorset Street The applicant is requesting approval to remove the existing siding and cover the existing trim at 337 Dorset Street and replace or cover it with vinyl siding and metal trim of the same color. The subject property falls within Design District 3 of the City Center Design Review (CCDR) Overlay District. Pursuant to Section 24.10 of the Zoning Regulations and Section 11.01(C)(3) of the proposed Land Development Regulations, buildings in this district should have pitched roofs, consist of wood, vinyl, brick, or stone materials, and contain natural or subdued colors. Pursuant to Section 24.201(b) of the Zoning Regulations and Section 11.01(D)(1)(e) of the proposed Land Development Regulations, the addition or removal of materials to or from the exterior shall be subject to design review by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB). Design plans for properties within Design District 3 shall comply with the following design criteria: (a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of major elements, and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All sides of a building shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material, window treatments, architectural accents, cornice/parapet design, etc. The design of a building should consider the design features of other structures in the area so as not to be harshly discordant with other nearby buildings. The building design is not changing as a result of this proposal. Existing wood clapboards will be replaced by vinyl of the same width and color. Existing wooden trim elements will be wrapped with metal of the same color. (b) Materials used High quality, attractive materials shall be used on all buildings. Natural, indigenous materials of stone and masonry are highly encouraged, if not 337 Dorset Street Design Review Application DR-03-02 DRC Apkil 28, 2003 Page 2 of 4 required. natural, indigenous materials of stone, masonry and wood shall predominate. Synthetic materials such as vinyl siding may be used in place of wood provided it is of high quality and closely resembles wood clapboard/shingles. Other materials may be used as an architectural accent provided they are harmonious with the building and site. 1. The foundation needs to be scraped and painted in places where paint is currently pealing. Staff believes the proposed vinyl siding and metal trim wrap are in keeping with this standard. However, staff notes that the foundation paint is currently pealing and should be scraped and replaced with fresh paint of the same color. (c) Colcrs and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be hanmonious with the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby. Colors naturally occurring from building materials and other traditional, subdued colors are encouraged. More than three (3) predominant colors are discouraged. The building is primarily white with black window shutters and a subdued asphalt shingle roof. Texture is smooth. These features will not change as a result of the proposed residing. (d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment shall be a careful response to the buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The treatment of windows and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that gives necessary order and unity to the facade, yet avoids monotony. \drrMeary\siding.srp.doc 337 Dorset Street Design Review Application DR-03-02 DRC April 28, 2003 Page 3 of 4 No new windows or doors are proposed. However, the existing wooden trim is proposed to be wrapped with metal of the same color as the existing trim paint. (e) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building. They shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines. For one-story structures, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 8 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. For structures of two (2) or more stories, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 5 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. Only a small portion of roof area may be flat provided it is not visible from the public street, existing or planned, or does not detract from the overall design and harmony of the building. Where portions of a roof are flat, architectural elements such as cornices and parapets shall be included to improve the appearance and provide interest. Large, low -slope (i.e., less than 5 on 12) gable forms are discouraged. No changes to the existing roof are proposed. (fJ Orient buildings to the pubilc street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that relates the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks, present an inviting street front and promote traditional street patterns. The building is existing and already oriented to the public street. \dre\lea ry\siding.srp. doc 337 Dorset Street Design Review Application DR-03-02 DRC April 28, 2003 Page 4 of 4 (g) Conceal rooftop devicas. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. This criterion is not relevant to the current proposal. (h) Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should consider solar energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun's energy during the winter and providing shade during the summer. This criterion is not relevant to the current proposal. RECOINMENDAI TION Staff reccmgnends Ma9the Dezign Review Commiffee recommend approval by they Daqj(azlcpmerRavis?,v Board of design review appficadonIRDR-03-02 candifianal upon &e appIlic.ing zcrzp„"'t?G and an dzda kundztgon Jr, cu'rTGnV" Y peeling. \drcXIeary\siding.srp.doc Permit Murnber DR- 0 3 - o2 CITY OF SOUTH BURLE14GTON APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW All information requested on -this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. 1) Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): 2/ Design Plan Approval 0 Sign Design Approval 2) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fags#) Z 3 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax 4) 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fim., ff) 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: — 3 3 7 Dvn;ct. 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 4 QS,- 2C2 0 0 j-' 3 '7 1�_ 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement. or modification for which design review approvat is being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and height. - Color A If,; /0/11 11 V9 1S1' n C 36dr 2Y The information listed on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of an required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sip details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge, -- Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMSSION: 4 -// -f /o 3 I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: A?,-, -COTPlete 11 Incomplete "IV / f , /:I/ A /I Zoning or IMMUng DESIGN REVIEW The information listed below must be submitted along with an application for design review. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g.,site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. Failure to provide the following information Will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. Design Plan Approval o One or more current photographs of the property showing the present condition o A site plan of the property in accordance with Section 26. 10 of the Zoning Regulations. c Building elevations, drawn to scale, showing all sides of the building including: ® architectural details ® exterior equipment located on the roof, walls, and ground building height existing and proposed grading color, type and texture of building material doors ® siding cornices * entablatures roofing material moldings and trim window details including panes of glass, dimensions, shutters, lintels and awnings details (cut sheets) of all proposed exterior lights Sign Design Approval o Plans (drawn to scale) and specifications showing the size, dimensions and color of the sign and its various parts, the style of letter, material of which the sip is to be constructed, and method of attachment to the building or in the ground. o Color sketch of the sign and building as they would appear in relation to each other. o Statement as to method of illumination -and intensity of the sign. o A/laster signage plan containing the following: an accurate site plan of the property shoiA4ng the location of buildings, parking, lets, driveways and landscaped areas. E3 computations of the maximum area, number, and height of signs, by sign type (i.e., freestanding, wall, etc.), allowed on the property under the sign ordinance. ® computations of the area and height of each sign on the property, both existing signs to remain and proposed new signs. * xn accurate indication on the site )Ian of the proposed location of all signs on the property, both existing signs to remain and proposed new signs. 19 standards for consistency among all signs on the property (existing and proposed). j NOTICE OF CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL WHEREAS, Roberta A. Kiehl (hereinafter referred to as "Applicant") is the record owner of property commonly known and designated as 337 Dorset Street located in the City of South Burlington; and WHEREAS, On July 11, 1989 Applicant received approval from the Planning Commission for the City of South Burlington for the conversion of an existing house into a professional office building on the above -mentioned property; and WHEREAS, the professional office building project approved by the South Burlington Planning Commission is specifically shown on a plan entitled "Site Plan for Professional Office for Roberta A. Kiehl" prepared by Palmer Company, Ltd., dated March 13, 1986 and last revised June 29, 1989; and WHEREAS, the South Burlington Planning Commission conditioned its approval on Applicant's agreement to provide access to Dorset Street to certain adjoining properties; and WHEREAS, the above -mentioned condition regarding access is intended to apply not only to the Applicant but tc the Applicant's heirs, successors and assigns; NOW THEREFORE, the City of South Burlington and the Applicant hereby record this Notice of Condition of Site Plan Approval to establish said condition as a covenant and requirement that shall run with and be binding upon the property of Applicant unless and until modified by the South Burlington Planning Commission: McNEIL A MURRAY multu NOTOM, Y[AMOIiT "I 1 f 1. Applicant shall improve the property that is the subject of this Notice, commonly referred to as 337 Dorset Street, in accordance with the above -referenced approved site plan. 2. The City of South Burlington acting through its Zoning Administrator, Planning Commission, Zoning Board of Adjustment or their designate or successors, may require the owners of properties adjoining the Applicant's property, commonly known and designated as 333 Dorset Street, and 341 Dorset Street to utilize the curb cut located on Applicant's property as the sole and exclusive means of access to their properties from Dorset Street. If the City of South Burlington elects to impose such a condition on the owners of 333 or 341 Dorset Street, it shall require said property owners to construct at their expense any driveway or other improvements necessary to accomplish said access arrangement and share an appropriate portion of the expense of maintaining the shared driveway access to Dorset Street. Dated at South Burlington, Vermont, this day of Witness Witness i Witn sue; Witness 1989. City of South Burlington Planning Commission Roberta A. Kiehl, Applicant E City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 March 15, 1993 Roberta Kiehl Dorset Mobil Home Brokers 337 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Amend Condition Dear Ms. Kiehl: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the January 26, 1993 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the condition of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S' c rely J Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp PLANNING COMMISSION 26 JANUARY 1993 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a meeting on Tuesday, 26 January 1993, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: William Burgess, Chairman; Catherine Peacock, David Austin, Terry Sheahan, Mary -Barbara Maher, Mac Teeson, William Craig Also Present: Joe Weith, City Planner; Sandy Greiner, Free Press; Sheila Mc- Intyre, Richard Bushnell, Douglas Fitzpatrick, Roger Dickinson, Chip Ward, Robert Kiehl, Ernest Pomerleau, David White, Chris Dunn, John Steele, Lance Llewellyn, John Larkin, Greg Rabideau, Pat Leclair, Brenda Raleigh 1. Other Business: a. Mr. Burgess noted he got a call from the City Manager regarding Certificates of Occupancy. Mr. Hafter said the problem is one of site work not being done and said that in the future conditional C of O's will be issued where landscaping is a question but it would be a requirement that all building stip- ulations be complied with. They will be stringent to see that everything was built according to plan. 2. Minutes of 8 February 1992: It was noted on p. 7, paragraph 3, it should read "the Old Farm Road.". Mrs. Maher moved to approve the Minutes of 8 February as amended. Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion passed 6-0 with Mr. Craig abstaining. 3. REquest of Roberta Kiehl to amend a condition of approval for an office use at 337 Dorset St. which requires the parking lot to be paved by the end of 1992 construction season: Ms. Kiehl noted this is part of the Dorset St. project which is not yet done. Members had no problem granting an extension. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the request of Roberta Kiehl to amend conditon of #2 of the 7/11/89_approval for an office use at 337 Dorset St. and which was subsequent amended on 10/8/91, to read as follows: "Due to potential im acts of dust from a ravel arkin lot on adjoining residential uses the applicant shall pave__the_parking_prior to completion of the Dorset Street widening project." Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 25, 1993 Roberta Kiehl Dorset Mobile Home Brokers 337 Dorset street South Bur] naton, Vermont 09403 Re: Amend Condition Dear Ms. Kiehl: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project. Please note the condition of approval. If you have any questions, please %�e me a call. cerel Y. J e Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp .�� r� r v. ~_ MOTION OF APPROVAL KIEHL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the request of Roberta Kiehl to amend condition #2 of the 7/11/89 approval for an office use at 337 Dorset Street, and which was subsequently amended on 10/8/91, to read as follows: "Due to potential impacts of dust from a gravel parking lot on adjoining residential uses, the applicant shall pave the parking prior to completion of the Dorset Street widening project." M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: January 26, 1993 agenda items Date: January 22, 1993 3) ROBERTA KIEHL - AMEND PREVIOUS CONDITION - 337 DORSET STREET The applicant received site plan approval from the Planning Commission on July 11, 1989 (minutes enclosed) to convert a single family dwelling to an office. One of the conditions of approval required the applicant to pave the parking lot by the end of the 1991 construction season which was the then estimated completion date of the Dorset Street project. On October 8, 1991 (minutes enclosed) the Planning Commission amended this condition to pave the parking lot by the end of the 1992 construction season due to the delayed Dorset Street project. Apparently, the State agreed to pave the parking lot as part of the agreement to sell the strip of land needed for widening. Since the Dorset Street project is not yet complete, this paving has not been completed, The applicant is now requesting that this condition be amended to require the paving by the end of the 1993 construction season. It is anticipated that the Dorset Street project will be completed by this time. Staff recommends that the timing of paving be tied to the completion of Dorset Street. 4) EUGENE WARD - OFFICE ADDITION - SITE PLAN This project consists of the construction of a 1,483 square foot addition to an existing 1,760 square foot professional office. This use was originally approved by the Planning Commission on 4/22/86 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 3069 Williston Road lies within the I-C District. This property is bounded on the east by a single family dwelling and a mixed -use commercial building, on the west and south by a single family dwelling owned by the applicant and on the north by Williston Road. Access/circulation: Access is via one (1) 20 foot curb cut on Williston Road which will remain unchanged. Circulation is adequate. 1 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 22, 1993 Roberta Kiehl Dorset Mobile Home Brokers 337 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Amend Condition Dear Ms. Kiehl: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, January 26, 1993 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. S' erely, oe Weith, City Planner Encls JW/mcp PLANNING COMMISSION 8 October 1991 Page 3 within some specified period of time if they can work out an arrangement satisfactory to the Planning Commission and Mr. Farrell and all of the owners of property down there, that we would consider leaving that bank standing. Mr. Craig stated that when we contact them, we should tell the., L': crar._- ing theq an extension, it is not an approval for something that they might come in for in the future. Mr. Weith said that he will warn it to consider a request for a one- year -ex- tension on that condition. Mr. Burgess said to make sure that that is all that gets warned and this is not a reintroduction of anything else that HeathCo. would like to do. d. Mr. Weith explained that next week we Will have a work session for the Southeast Quadrant zoning and the Comprehensive Plan amendments. Another item he added is to discuss the Central District 2 in our City Center and some of the problems that our zoning is creating in terms of allowing a buildable area for buildings along Dorset Street. We have had some people who want to do something there but cannot because of the zoninq. 2. Minutes of August 6, 1991. Ms. Pugh moved the Minutes of August 6, 1991 be approved as written. Ms. Peacock seconded. Motion passed 6 to 0 with Mr. Sheahan abstaining. 3. Request of Roberta Kiehl to amend a condition of approval for an office use at 337 Dorset Street which requires the parking lot to be paved by the end of the 1991 construction season. Mr. Burgess stated this is a request that has been approved by the Planning Commission to convert a single-family dwelling into an office and the parking lot had to be paved by the end of this constriction season. The applicant is requesting to have this condition amended to deiay the paving as the state is going to be paving the lot as part of the Dorset Street extension project. Ms. Pugh asked if the other conditions have been meL. Mr. Weith replied yes. Mr. Austin moved the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the request of Roberta Kiehl to amend condition #2 of the 7i11/69 approval for an office use at 337 Dorset Street to read as follows: "Due to potential impacts of dust from a gravel parking lot on adjoining residential uses, the applicant shall pave the parking lot by the end of the 1992 construction season.Mrs. Maher seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Site Plan application ai 1.S_(:. iunding, inc. iur wtobiie heave sales and financing use on a two (2) acre parcel, 2069 Williston Road. PLANNING COMMISSION 11 JULY 1989 pace 5 Mr. Weith noted that changes suqqested at the last discussion had been made. Expansion of any non -complying structure would require conditional use review. Mr. Craiq asked if there is any problem with reduced side yard setbacks. Mr. Weith said BOCA says it complies providinq there are proper firewalls. Mr. Schatz asked if the amendment covers the purchase of a building and totally gutting and rebuilding. Mr. Weith said that would still be as it is now, but it would make it easier to conform. Mr. Weith said the next step is to submit the amendment to the City Council who will hold a public hearing. It must be approved by the Council. Mr. Crowley said he felt the Commission had done a very good job on this. Mrs. Maher moved that the Planning Commission approve and siqn the REsolution dated 7/11/89 concerning Queen City Park and further that the Planning Commission approve the amendments to the South Burliqnton Zoning Requlations to establish a Queen City Park District, dated 6/21/89, and that these amendments be forwarded to the City Council for their consideration and adoption. Mr. Burqess seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Craiq left the meetinq at this point. 7. Site Plan application of Roberta Kiehl for conversion of a 1,000 sq. ft. single family home to office use, 337 Dorset Street Mr. Cau18 sited the property 150 ft. south of Brookwood Drive. next to the insurance building. It is a one-story ranch, now a sinqle family home. Access is on the north side of the house. They propose to widen this to 20 ft. There would be 5 parking spaces in back. The building would not be enlarged. All set- backs are met. Access to the building would be from the rear. Mr. Weith noted the City Center plan wants to allow connections of rear parkinq lots. He told the applicant it would be a benefit to the City if they would allow connections to other parking lots. Mr. Weith also noted they are trying to minimize curb cuts, and it would be beneficial to have the other 2 buildings access from this drive when they are developed. He felt this would work easily with the property to the north but wasn't sure about the one to the south. Mr. Caulo felt this was OK as long as the applicant was adequately protected by the wording. They would definitely consider it. PLANNING COMMISSION 11 JULY 1989 page 6 Mr. Belter raised the concern that the other buisnesses miqht take up all of this applicant's parking. Mr. Jacob said there would be a stipulation for the party to the north to have adequate parking. Mr. Jacob felt that the proposed pines near the cedar hedge would endanger the hedge. Other members agreed and felt the pines were not necessary. Mrs. Maher felt the front of the building should be spruced up. Mr. Burto, the northern neighbor, felt it was OK to use the building for offices. He had a problem with a gavel parking lot because of dust. He also noted that people visiting the insurance building have been parking in his driveway. He wanted to see some privacy fencing. Mr. Jacob noted the gavel is temporary until the road is upgraded. Mrs. Maher didn't feel it was too much to ask for a stockagde fence on the property line between the properties. Members aqreed on a 6 ft. stockaqe fence from the beqinning of the house to the back of the property. Mr. Burto also asked about lightinq. Mr. Caulo said the only lighting will be on the signage. There will be none in the parking area. Mr. Weith felt a 2-year limit could be put on the gravel lot reqardless of the status of Dorset St. Members agreed. Mr. Weith advised the Commission that by making this a Commercial use, it becomes a non -conforming structure. Mrs. Maher moved the Planninq Commission approve the site plan ap- plication of Roberta Kiehl for conversion of a 1,000 sq. ft. single-family home to office use as depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan, Professional Office for Roberta A. Kiehl," prepared by Harry Petrovs and dated 3/13/86, last revised 6/29/89, with the folowing stipulations; 1.`The applicant has expressed that she fully understands that as long as the building is used for commercial purposes, the existing structure will be non-conforminq since it is only 62 ft. from the residential zone to the west (Section 19.104(c) of the South Bur- lington Zoning Regulations). Therefore, as long as commercial uses exist within the structure, the structure and property will be subject to the provisions for non-conforminq structures set forth in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. 2. Due to potential impacts of dust from a gravel parking lot on adjoining residential uses, the applicant shall pave the parking lot by the end of the 1991 construction season. PLANNING COMMISSION 11 JULY 1989 paqe 7 3. Based on the expressed representation of the applicant, the ap- plicant shall allow connections between her parking lot and parking lots on adjoininq properties as these properties develop. 4. The applicant shall record an access agreement to provide access to the adjoininq properties to the south and north. This agreement shall be written by the City Attorney and reviewed and approved by the applicant and shall be recorded prior to permit. 5. A 6 foot high stockade fence shall be installed along the north property line from the front of the building to the back property line. This shall be shown on the plan. 6. Revised plan addressing stipulation #5 shall be submitted to the City Planner for approval prior to permit. 7. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. Mr. Belter seconded. Motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meetinq adjourned at 9:50 pm. Clerk January 12, 1993 Planning Commission City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Attn: Ray Belair Dear Ray: It was decided by the Planning Commission that my driveway and parking lot at 337 Dorset Street should be paved by the end of the construction season of 1992. The State is paying for the paving as part of the package deal made with the previous owner, Ron Muir, and the same condition was passed onto me. obviously, the construction of. Dorset Street is not completed and I am asking you to extend this condition to the end of the construction season of 1993. In view of the fact that I have a shared driveway with Attorney Morewood's office and this condition does not apply to him, I feel that my request is is very reasonable. Sincerely, Roberta Kiehl City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 December 7, 1992 Robert Kiehl 209 Lakewood Parkway Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: 337 Dorset Street, Condition of Site Plan Approval Dear Ms. Kiehl: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This is to bring to your attention to amended condition #2 of your 7/11/89 site plan approval. This condition was amended on 10/8/91 and requires that you pave your parking lot "by the end of the 1992 construction season". This condition should be met as soon as possible as the construction season is rapidly approaching closure. Failure to comply with this condition may result in legal action by the City of South Burlington and fines of up to $50 per day for each day the violation continues. Please contact this office as soon as the work is completed. Another option may be to apply to the Commission to once again amend the condition to require paving by the "end of the 1993 construction season. This may be justified since the completion of the Dorset Street project has been delayed to fall, 1993. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Please contact this office soon to let us know how you wish to proceed. Since ly, Raym nd J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 January 1 t.4 , .19 9 2 Ms. Roberta Kiehl 209 Lakewood Parkway Burlington, Ver-rtiont 054.01 Re: 337 Dorset. St_..reet. Dear. M,-:. Kiehl.: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please final a cope of ti-e October 8, 1991.Planning Cc,mmission meeting minutes. it you have any questions, please give me a call. .l.y V4 , oe We.:"_... City Planner :TW,Irncp PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 November 6, 1991 Ms. Roberta Kiehl 209 Lakewood Parkway Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Amend Conditions of Approval, 337 Dorset Street Dear Ms. Kiehl: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Si er ly 1 s I� I 1 J Weith, C ty Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp 10/8/91 JW MOTION OF APPROVAL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the request of Roberta Kiehl to amend condition #2 of the 7/11/89 approval for an office use at 337 Dorset Street to -ate !7, I1_ I D u t 4-6 p O e.. to, ( I'rk (o P. c l's off' Otv- l rrO *K A. G rk ve_ l (a r k 1' of 0., cJjc i n l r reps t At-i-AA ! u sc.5, 4-kc ertGf M E M O R a u 2 u M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Joe Weith, City Planner Re: October 8, 1991 agenda items Date: October 4, 1991 3) ROBERTA KIEHL = MEND PREVIOUS CONDITION - 337 OD RSET STREET The applicant received site plan approval from the Planning Commission on July 11, 1989 (minutes enclosed) to convert a single-family dwelling to an office. One of the conditions of approval required the applicant to pave the parking lot by the end of the 1991 construction season. The applicant is requesting that the Planning Commission amend this condition and delay the implementation of the requirement until the end of the 1992 construction season since the State will be paving the lot as part of the Dorset Street project. Staff recommends approving the request. 4) TSC FUNDING, INC. - MOBILE HOME SALES - 2069 WILLISTON ROAD This project consists of using an undeveloped lot for a mobile home sales office and display lot for four (4) mobile homes and a financing office in a separate building. This proposal involves two (2) principal buildings on the same lot which under Section 19.65 can only be allowed under a Planned Unit Development. Since this lot does not have the required four (4) acre minimum for a PUD, a variance is being requested which will be heard by the Zoning Board of Adjustment on October 7th. The proposed mobile home sales use is not permitted in this district so a use variance is also being requested. This property is located at 2069 Williston Road and is within the Commercial 1' District. It is bounded on the west by Dr. Peet's Chiropractic Office, on the east by Rent -A -Wreck, on the south by a vacant lot and Woodland Place and on the north by Williston Road. Access/Circulation: Access is via a 35 foot curb cut and shared access drive with the property to the east. A shared access agreement is in effect and a copy of this agreement is recorded in the City land records. The site will have two (2) connections to this shared access drive thereby creating a circular drive through the site. This circular design is preferred by the Fire Chief. Circulation pattern is acceptable. 1 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 4, 1991 Roberta Kiehl .A9 Lakewood P'-:trlWay Bux-11-n-mtcyn, \T—mont- 05401 Re: Amenc i Conditions of Approval, 337 D(-.)r--,et. Street 'ecil- ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 is thF- agend..--i far next Tuesday's Planning Commission ry:eet-ing and rr!.7 -comments to the Planning Commission. P I e's e b, - -i!re someone i- present on Tuesdzty, October 8, 1991 at 7:30 P.M. re -quest. have an, j-dease give rile a cali. C cer I . (Z j5e Weith, City Planner En c -1 - City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 September 4, 1991 Roberta Kiehl 209 Lakewood Parkway Burlington, Vermont 05401_ ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: 337 Dorset Street - Conditions of Site Plan Approval Dear Ms. Kiehl: The purpose of this letter is to bring to your attention a condi- tion of approval setforth by the South Burlington Planning Com- mis when they ippi_-oved your office at. 1177 Doi: -et. St.reF t. This condition requires that you pave the parking lot by the end of the 1991 construction season (see enclosed Findings of Fact). Any other conditions imposed by the Planning Commission must also be met. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. cerely, oe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl JW/mcp 7t ke C.'t- e� o.4 TAll- nil NOTICE OF CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL WHEREAS, Roberta A. Kiehl (hereinafter referred to as "Applicant") is the record owner of property commonly known and designated as 337 Dorset Street located in the City of South Burlington; and WHEREAS, On July 11, 1989 Applicant received approval from the Planning Commission for the City of South Burlington for the conversion of an existing house into a professional office building on the above -mentioned property; and WHEREAS, the professional office building project approved by the South Burlington Planning Commission is specifically shown on a plan entitled "Site Plan for Professional Office for Roberta A. Kiehl" prepared by Palmer Company, Ltd., dated March 13, 1986 and last revised June 29, 1989; and WHEREAS, the South Burlington Planning Commission conditioned its approval on Applicant's agreement to provide access to Dorset Street to certain adjoining properties; and WHEREAS, the above -mentioned condition regarding access is intended to apply not only to the Applicant but tc t:ie Applicant's heirs, successors and assigns; NOW THEREFORE, the City of South Burlington and the Applicant hereby record this Notice of Condition of Site Plan Approval to establish said condition as a covenant and requirement that shall run with and be binding upon the property of Applicant unless and until modified by the South Burlington Planning Commission: McNEIL do MURRAY SURLINOTON, VZRMONT"I 1 R 1. Applicant shall improve the property that is the subject of this Notice, commonly referred to as 337 Dorset Street, in accordance with the above -referenced approved site plan. 2. The City of South Burlington acting through its Zoning Administrator, Planning Commission, Zoning Board of Adjustment or their designate or successors, may require the owners of properties adjoining the Applicant's property, commonly known and designated as 333 Dorset Street, and 341 Dorset Street to utilize the curb cut located on Applicant's property as the sole and exclusive means of access to their properties from Dorset Street. If the City of South Burlington elects to impose such a condition on the owners of 333 or 341 Dorset Street, it shall require said property owners to construct at their expense any driveway or other improvements necessary to accomplish said access arrangement and share an appropriate portion of the expense of maintaining the shared driveway access to Dorset Street. Dated at South Burlington, Vermont, this day of Witness Witness i. Witn ss' Witness , 1989. City of South Burlington Planning Commission Roberta A. Kiehl, Applicant 11 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 February 8, 1990 Ms. Roberta Kiehl Lakewood Parkway Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Ms. Kiehl: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed please find your copy of Findings of Fact. If you have any questions please call me. Sincerely, Z9��� Joe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 July 7, 1989 Ms. Roberta Kiehl Lakewood Parkway Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Proposed Office Use, 337 Dorset Street Dear Ms. Kiehl: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Also enclosed are Bill Szymanski's comments. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, 7/11/89 at 8:30 P.M. to represent your request. Sincerely, 11 ;�/O,- -co -CA4 Joe Weith, City Planner Encls cc: Mr. Dave Kelly JW/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 August 21, 1989 Mr. Dave Kelly Highpoint Realty 1 Roosevelt Highway Colchester, Vermont 05468 Re: Office Use, 337 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Kelly: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the 7/18/89 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please meet the stipulations contained in the approval motion before applying for a building permit. Please call if you have any questions. ncerely, ✓� ��"` Joe Weith, City Planner 1 Encl cc: Roberta Kiehl JW/mcp Memorandum - Planning July 11, 1989 agenda -items July 7, 1989 Page 3 4) QUEEN CITY PARK ZONING DISTRICT. PUBLIC HEARING Enclosed is the proposed amendment to the South Burlington Zoning Regulations to establish a Q.C.P. District. As discussed at previous meetings, City Attorney, Steve Stitzel, recommended that the Planning Commission adopt a resolution which clearly states why the Planning Commission feels that the Q.C.P. neighborhood is unique and the existing zoning is inappropriate. I will have a resolution available at Tuesday's meeting. 5) REAL ESTATE OFFICE. CENTRAL DISTRICT 3. 337 DORSET STREET Roberta A. Kiehl,, as agent for Ronald & Mary Muir, proposes to convert an existing, 1,000 square foot, one story single-family dwelling to office use. Such use is a permitted use in the newly established Central District 3 zone. The property is bounded on the east by Dorset Street, and other- wise surrounded by residences. Access: Access is shown via a 20' wide curb cut on Dorset Street. This does not conform to the Dorset Street widening plans which propose a 12 foot wide access for this property. I feel a 20 foot wide access is more appropriate for a commercial use. I will consult with Mike Munson to see if the State can accommodate a 20 foot wide drive. The Planning Commission should start thinking about future access to these properties. It would be beneficial to the City if this one access could be used to serve all three lots when they all convert to commercial use especially since a primary goal of the city center plan is to share access and minimize curb cuts. This would require a shared access agreement. Circulation: Circulation is limited to one side (northern) and the rear (western) parts of the lot. The main building entrance will be redirected to the rear and no longer face Dorset Street. The parking lot will be in the rear. This is consistent with the goals of the City Center Plan. Section 1.70 of the City Center Zone requires rear parking lots to allow for access to adjoining properties. The applicant should be aware of this for future circulation purposes. Parking: Aisle and access widths are acceptable. The project requires 4 parking spaces and 5 spaces are proposed. Coverage: All coverage requirements of the district are met. Memorandum - Planning 3 July 11,1989 agenda items July 7, 1989 ' Page 4 Setbacks: Front, rear and side yard setbacks are met. The building does not meet the required 65 foot setback of commercial uses from residential zones. The building is 62 feet from the residential zone to the west. The Zoning Administrator said that since this is a pre-existing structure and no expansion to the building will be done, and since office is a permitted use, no variance is required. It is important that the applicant realize that by using this building for commercial use, the structure will become non -con- forming. Density: Maximum floor area ratio is 0.5. Proposed F.A.R. is .11. Landscaping: Minimal alterations to the existing structure ($500) are planned, establishing a required landscape value of only $15.00. the existing 15' cedar hedge provides an excellent screen, however, it is not on the applicant's property. I recom- mend that a row of pine trees be planted along the west property line on the applicant's property. This would better assure that a proper screen is maintained. Existing plantings to remain include lilac, rhododendron and a maple cluster. The front area is well landscaped with mature cedar hedges, flowering bushes and large pine tree. Traffic: The site is located in Zone 6 of the Traffic Overlay District. Based on the lot size of 8890 square feet, peak hour trip ends permitted are 10. I.T.E. estimates 2 peak hour trip ends for this use. Other: See Bill Szymanski's comments. 6) RECREATION PATH LAND ACQUISITION POLICY Bill Craig has proposed that the Planning Commission adopt a policy to be followed by the Commission, Council and Recreation Path Committee when acquiring land for the proposed recreation path. Some initial thoughts of things which I feel the policy should address include the following: 1. Size of easement - 15 to 20 feet. 2. Additional temporary construction easements. 3. Notification of all property owners within 100 feet of the proposed easement. 4. Review and recording process. If you have any other ideas, please share them at Tuesday's meeting. The Recreation Path Committee is also compiling a 4 C ITY OF S0U'll1 13Ult1, I NGTON S I TF. PkAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF HFCORU lname, ad(Jr•ess, phone #1 Ronald & Mary_Muir 17 Mayfair St., So. Burlington - 658-3029 2) APPLICANT ( name, address, phone #) Roberta Kiehli_______ Lakewood Parkway, Burlington, VT. _ 658-0149______. 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #)---, Dave KellY._ __--_ HighPoint Realty,Colchester, VT. 655-4700 4). PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 337 Dorset St —,-So. Bur li -g o-n,_VT.__ 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE(S) Real Estate Office 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor)1,000 sq.ft. 1, single story, 2 (1st & lower level 770 sq.ft., 230 sq.ft.) 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES 2-3 9).LOT COVERAGE: building %; landscaped areas�% building, parking, outside storage% 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings ; 500 , Landscaping 500 Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) ! /q0O #A140i 2u4j Drive & Darki 11 ) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out)2-3 cars/3 times a day Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 1 _; 12-1p.m. 1 1-2 P.M. 1 2-3 p.m._ 1 _ 3-4 p.m.-___l--; 4-5 p.m. 1 5-6 p.m. 1_; 6-7 p.m. 1 _ 13) PEAK }LOURS OF OPERATION: 9-5 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: M-F - 6/29/89-------------- __.'_�--_ - DATE OF SUBMISSION SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT 7/11/89 DATE OF HEARING I PLEASE SUBMIT I� iVE COPIES AND ONE REDUCED COPY (8 1 /2 X 11 OR 8 1/2 X 14) OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Lot drawn to scale (20 foot scale if possible). Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping. Existing and proposed curbcuts, pavement, walkways. Proposed landscaping plan (number, variety and size) equal to of greater than the required amount in the Zoning Regulations. Number and location of Parking Spaces: (9' x 18') with 22 or 21 foot aisles as required. Number and location of compact car spaces. (This requires separate Planning Commission approval). Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. (13 feet by 20 feet in size, one per every fifty spaces). Location of septic tanks (if applicable). Location of any easements. Lot coverage information: Building footprint, building, parking and outside storage, and landscaped areas. Location of site (Street # and lot #). North arrow. Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. -2- _PERCENTAGE OIL 0 COWR4GE sa Fr LOTSIZE 8890 A&WIS STATERO. JW I226 USEO REMAINING Xeg /00 SLCUM6 768 /O ACCESS /280 /7 PARKING AREA 2946 3/ Q� F OTAL CO✓ERAC.E a ,fix PAVID L M&M-EA 6EeTEAU 1-hWF CaeAVE.�. Oen/E-vJAY 8 d V. LI S R L5%. M 7 R - ILOU qPG 6'-�' � OT O OUAlO f YI'5rnLiC&, Po7r 6 Ra PElIrF / 6E P.E6o TO ..zw ..v 1 / ✓ P¢OPF75E.D 9 P veAVEI- \ O N 5EWE2 O �1 i 1 McEMOv>Ea ✓ ,F WDD p¢ppOSED d O g` PAZY-1 4b vA2l.wPi 53 0 �4A � � zauc.E �•, � �� 2 R Yo Exl�nw +t 537 >"e.0 Dt, It' x 18' P¢OPtYJEA 0 EXPAUy10�-J Wo � - / Ex15Tw6 - PIC.r.Br I/ TO 'L.F.r.JUEDY Ieou F1PE 9!a WHITE i pell/E. -uulC. GI).JE ' AJ I TE. Pt,A I.J 10' TO C4?6E R.O.W. I (IZO' TO Evc-of- 2.0.W. PE.R OLD HOAC- R1��� �/ \ m To FO¢ ne.OFE�S QU4L OFFICE TO 1e .'70, T' DAR- 170L*-'rl ROBERT,4 A. K/EHL , II MO"iE5 61CHA¢0 4 Wrw "- ... . I. 4,EFEJL TO A PwU 6•C HOob ci AH.Gr+. LAUCMAW 6'11 pO2-r-6T 61V.FfT 9AQIITI..E.D `CAE..IDAL-E A4R-IL:' JAU. W,5, VIbl 9470 D21Vf_WA`( SO. OUWJ�iC To1.I,VE¢MotiT 2EC.O4Zb6D IU J.11 P. L91 . FIpy sty t'ALML+N COMPANY, LTD. fi(). IIIn1l�N(i'RIN. VWU -uMlll T C* lZ7nF`C -T41 KITE V V P1.41.1 Yo 6E w�Ilo IF AU.Ue-A-rw- G'02. PL-AWKII"C, PURPOyEh "a'°' AI.10 I> L10T 'fD C.OU5T2USO Ab A 4��REA� DATE: MAPGN /3 /4 BYo 6/29iB9 G'ti'0 SCALE: l' < i0' DOLJ"VAJ2'-( M.AG SO / SURVEYED: M. L.I400 ✓ N. oETeO✓S JOB M / �i ✓. (,�i�+M orUwN: HA¢e.•/ GE73t0N5 CHFCNED: /v(geK WAe,9 RESK a - ow MICHAELj.MUNSON, PH.D. PLANNING CONSULTANT Burlington Plann�ny Lumm�ss� From: Michael J. Munson Dorset Street Project Coordinator Subject: Comments regarding the site plan for the Muir parcel � I met yesterday with Dave Kelly of High Point Realty to discuss a proposed site plan for the Muir property at 337 Dorset Street. As I understand it, he ID to convert what is presently a residential property into a professional office. Included in that proposal is the widening of the existing driveway and provision (::I a paved parking area in the rear yard. I see no conflicts between this proposal and the plans for reconstructing Dorset Street except for the width of the driveway. Since this is presently a residential property, only a 12 foot curb cut is shown on the plans. If it is converted to an office structure, the 20 foot driveway is appropriate, and the plans can be revised accordingly. Therefore, I request that the Planning Commission, if it approves the site plan, send me a copy of the approved plan so that I can ensure that the road plans are revised accordingly. There is one other point I would like to make. As part of the compensation agreement negotiated between the Agency of Transportation and the present owner c.3 the property, it has been agreed that the Dorset Street project will construct a paved turn around area in the rear yard--arectangular area approximately 45' by 40'. This will be done as part of the road project. The proposed site plan calls for a parking area somewhat larger than that, but in the same location. It makes sense that the applicant not be required to pave the area which the project will pave. In order to prevent such duplication, I suggest that the Commission consider allowing the applicant to provide a gravel parking area until such time as the road project paves its portion, at which time the applicant should be required to pave the remainder. If all goes well, I expect that this will occur in 1991. If you have any questions about this, don't hesitate to call on me. 7/11/89 JW MOTION OF APPROVAL I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Roberta Kiehl for conversion of a 1,000 square foot single-family home to office use as depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan, Professional Office for Roberta A. Kiehl," prepared by Harry Petrovs and dated 3/13/flO, last revised 6/29/89, with the following stipulations: 1. The lan shall e revise to show a rod 'f pines along the r ar plop rty line order o pr?Pe .y ma nt in a..Sc�een }�etweeri t /ede f' e usq'and resident al xses to e est.r­'�` Te app]„i�t�ant s o t a 3' year lar�'dscaping `bon p or tirmit' in an amount t e5pixined bye:t e City Planne j The applicant has expressed that she fully understands that as long as the building is used for commercial purposes, the existing structure will be non -conforming since it is only 62 feet from the residential zone to the west (Section 19.104(c) of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations). Therefore, as long as commercial uses exist within the structure, the structure and property will be subject to the provisions for non -conforming structures setforth in the South url'ngton Zoning Regulations. �. D e to potential impacts of dust from a gravel parking lot on adjo ning residential uses, the applicant shall pave the parking lot a ? 4. Based upon the expressed representation of the applicant, the applicant shall allow connections between her parking lot and parking lots on adjoining properties as these properties develop. 17fd. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months or this approval is null and void. F]. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Engineer Re: July 11, 1989 agenda items Date July 7, 1989 3) BLODGETT PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, HOLMES ROAD EXTENSION 1. Driveways shall have a depressed concrete curb. 2. Underground electric and telephone lines shall be outside of the Holmes Road Extension right-of-way. Plans shall be submitted showing these utility easements also the street lighting plan. 3. There should be more inlets for site drainage especially between the units instead of all street drainage across driveways and road. 4. Sidewalk's concrete shall be 5 inches thick and 8 inches at driveways. 5) ROBERTA A. KIEHL. 337 DORSET STREET 1. The 20 foot driveway will not conform to the proposed widen- ing plan for Dorset Street. The plans call for a 12 foot drive. The 20 feet will work if it is shared with the adjacent property to the north (Berteau). 2. Drainage shall be toward the westerly line and then southerly where a swale exists. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 PLANNER 658-7955 July 19, 1989 Mr. David Kelly HighPoint Realty 1 Roosevelt Highway Colchester, Vermont 05446 RE: Office Use, 337 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont Dear Mr. Kelly: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 As you are well aware, the Planning Commission stipulated as a condition of the approval for the above referenced project that the applicant record an access easement/agreement for the adjoining properties to the north and south. Enclosed is a draft "Notice of Conditions of Site Plan Approval" which the City Attorney feels is the most appropriate method in which to meet the stipulation mentioned above. Please review the draft document and provide me with your comments. If this document is acceptable to you, I will send you the original for the applicant's signature and recording. Sincerely; ` Joseph Weith City Planner JW/b No Text f �� war t,.P.(�. I,� f�--.,.�„ 11 t._ y�.a_d.�! tw&oy C'e �'- 3�l3 � d'7o ; rw 6/L9 l �9 04 7 Vef 0711- � a V� 4�4-la` `� ` * I �� -�� 6%11� a , (70 - , zl,,* �� = .10,07 O /Vo 0�dthpk.A'&4 6 - ,w A. -Of Avoo dfvote dte4iL�s �e ul M' e -S McNEIL & MURRAY BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 NOTICE OF CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL WHEREAS, Roberta A. Kiehl (hereinafter referred to as "Applicant") is the record owner of property commonly known and designated as 337 Dorset Street located in the City of South Burlington; and WHEREAS, On July 11, 1989 Applicant received approval from the Planning Commission for the City of South Burlington for the conversion of an existing house into a professional office building on the above -mentioned property; and WHEREAS, the professional office building project approved by the South Burlington Planning Commission is specifically shown on a plan entitled "Site Plan for Professional Office for Roberta A. Kiehl" prepared by Palmer Company, Ltd., dated March 13, 1986 and last revised June 29, 1989; and WHEREAS, the South Burlington Planning Commission conditioned its approval on Applicant's agreement to provide access to Dorset Street to certain adjoining properties; and WHEREAS, the above -mentioned condition regarding access is intended to apply not only to the Applicant but to the Applicant's heirs, successors and assigns; NOW THEREFORE, the City of South Burlington and the Applicant hereby record this Notice of Condition of Site Plan Approval to establish said condition as a covenant and requirement that shall run with and be binding upon the property of Applicant unless and until modified by the South Burlington Planning Commission: 1 1. Applicant shall improve the property that is the subject of this Notice, commonly referred to as 337 Dorset Street, in accordance with the above -referenced approved site plan. 2. The City of South Burlington acting through its Zoning Administrator, Planning Commission, Zoning Board of Adjustment or their designate or successors, may require the owners of properties adjoining the Applicant's property, commonly known and designated as 333 Dorset Street, and 341 Dorset Street to utilize the curb cut located on Applicant's property as the sole and exclusive means of access to their properties from Dorset Street. If the City of South Burlington elects to impose such a condition on the owners of 333 or 341 Dorset Street, it shall require said property owners to construct at their expense any driveway or other improvements necessary to accomplish said access arrangement and share an appropriate portion of the expense of maintaining the shared driveway access to Dorset Street. Dated at South Burlington, Vermont, this day of , 1989. Witness Witness Witness Witness City of South Burlington Planning Commission Roberta A. Kiehl, Applicant r MUIR Real Estate Corner To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Ronald Muir Re: Agent for Site Plan Review Date: June 26, 1989 RFALTOP' (802) 658-1788 33 Patchen Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Please be notified that Roberta Kiehl has my permission to represent me as agent for 337 Dorset Street, South Burlington, in the application process for site plan approval and change of use to a professional office. 1WV-1-11 Ron Muir No Text Ar - ----- --- -'" " A---- u P p 1 � I 4i f \C 1