The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0329 Dorset StreetOctober 30, 2017 Henry & Sherry Barton 2 Sherry Road South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Missing Trees — 329 Dorset.Street Dear Mr. & Mrs. Barton: Your letter of 10/20/17 to Kevin Dorn was forwarded to me reply. I conducted an inspection of the 329 Dorset Street property and did discover that some of the trees between your property and theirs were missing. I have sent to owner of that property a letter requesting that they replace the missing trees with trees as similar size as possible to the existing ones. They were also requested to plant them this fall if at all possible. Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention. Should you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, R mond J. Be 'ir Administrative Officer cc: Kevin Dorn, City Manager 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.41 01 www.sburi.com ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Sherry Barton <outlook E359549BE18AD56Anoutlook.com> Date: Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:08 PM Subject: Brookwood/Sherry Road Neighborhood To: "kevin ,sburl.com" <kevin(a sburl.com>, "ray@soburl.com" <raynsoburl.com> Good afternoon, My husband, Henry, and I reside at 2 Sherry Road which in on the corner of Brookwood and Sherry. I understand that you recently met with our neighbors, Susan and Ken Dattilio, regarding the problem we are having with parking in front of our homes. As you are aware, Dorset Street Dermatology owns two buildings on each side of Brookwood Drive. The parking facilities are unable to support the large number of employees and patients, so the employees have been instructed by their employer to park on street. This results in no less than 4-5 employee cars, plus those additional patient cars having to park in a very small area. This is not a sporadic problem. It is each and every business day. Most days, we (or our guests) are unable to find parking near our homes. Often it is difficult for us to even enter our driveway. In the winter, this problem is even worse with the very high snowbanks. We have even seen the emergency vehicles have to take extra time navigating the cars. This creates a major safety issue. We have asked the employees many, many times to use their own parking lot. We have approached Dr. Mitchell to try to come to a solution. All communication has now broken down and the relationship is very tense. When Dr. Mitchell applied for his zoning approval, the families in the neighborhood were assured he had plenty of parking. He advised that his newer office would be more store -like, with patients only parking for a few minutes while going into the office to purchase goods. This is not the case. It appears Dr. Mitchell is conducting patient appointments that last much longer than that of a "drop in and purchase" type of transaction. To make matters worse, those patients (and even employees) often take the time to walk their dogs down Brookwood Drive so that they may relieve themselves on our property. Many times we find doggy waste bags left on our lawn or on the grass median between the sidewalk and street. When we moved to our home, a beautiful cedar hedge was in place between our yard and the dermatology building (formerly an insurance office). Since the dermatology office has become busier and the greater need for plowing/salting in the winter, many of the trees are in the process of dying or have died and needed to be removed. We have lost a significant amount of privacy in our backyard. It is my understanding that this hedge is a requirement to serve as a buffer between the commercial building and our residence. If this is the case, we request that Dr. Mitchell be required to restore the hedge to its prior state immediately. For all of these reasons, we completely and fully support the request to have "resident only" parking for this area. We look forward to working with the City to accomplish this prior to the winter season. Please feel free to contact me with any questions. Thank you. Sherry Morin Barton 802-373-7263 �. PLANNING & ZONING October 30, 2017 Mitchwartz Properties, LLC c/o Mitchell Schwartz, Registered Agent 20 Hall Road South Hero, VT 05486 RE: Zoning Violation — Missing Trees — 329 Dorset Street Dear Dr. Schwartz: It has been brought to my attention that some of the Arborvitae trees that were included on the site plan approved (see enclosed site plan) to convert a general office building to your medical office building in 1999, at the above referenced address, have died and been removed. I call your attention to Section 13.06 (1) of the Land Development Regulations (see enclosed) which describes the requirement that the missing trees will have to be replaced. Therefore, please replace the missing trees with trees as close to the height of the existing trees to maintain this buffer between your commercial property and the adjacent residential property. If at all possible, please have them planted this fall Should you have any questions, please let me know. Sinceree�, t Ra J. elair Administrative Officer Encl 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Corporations Division https://www.vtsosonl ine. com/online/Business Inquire/BusinessInforma... Back Business Information Business Details Business Name: MITCHWARTZ PROPERTIES, LLC Business Type: Domestic Limited Liability Company LLC Subtype: Manager Managed Date of Incorporation / 08/12/2009 Registration Date: Business Description: REAL ESTATE PROPERTIE; Designated Office 325 Dorset Street, South Business Address: Burlington, VT 05403, USA Citizenship / State of Domestic/VT Incorporation: Last Report Filed: 01/01/2017 Principals Information Business ID: 0030739 Business Status: Active Did the LLC have membersW the time of filing? Fiscal Year Month: 12 Designated Office 325 Dorset Street, South j Mailing Address: Burlington, VT, 05403, USA Last Annual Report Year: 2016 Next Filing Due Date: 01/01/2018 Name/Title: Physical Address: MITCHELL SCHWARTZ, MD/Manager 325 DORSET STREET, SOUTH BURLINGT Registered Agent Information Name: MITCHELL SCHWARTZ MD Physical Address: 20 HALL RD, S HERO, VT, 05486, USA Mailing Address: 20 HALL RD, S HERO, VT, 05486, USA Trade Name Information No Trade Name(s) associated to this business. Back Filing History Name History Return to Search 1 of 1 10/27/2017, 3:29 PM 10/27/2017 City of South Burlington Grand List Page 1 of 1 03:27 pm Parcel Report ray For Parcel: 0570-00329. MITCHWARTZ PROPERTIES LLC Name MITCHWARTZ PROPERTIES LLC 20 HALL ROAD S HERO VT 05486 Location 911 329 DORSET ST Tax Map 26-061-000 Codes: (1) (Category)C (Equipment) (Owner)C Wood Crop Pasture Other Site Total Acres: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 Real Land Building Equipment Inventory Values: 102,600 74,000 28,600 0 0 Homestead Veterans Farm Stab. L.U. Acres Land Use 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Contract Lease Prev. Eqpm Land Use Amt Prev. Real 0 0.00 0 0.00 102,600 Housesite Special Exmp Grand List 0.00 0.00 1,026.00 Misc: Status: T Bill #: 56040 Updated: 02/28/2017 Last sale was: Invalid on 10/02/2009 for $0 recorded on 898/28 Grievance Info: Flag: N Remarks: (1) Misc Fields: (0): 150098000 (7): POSSIBLE TIFF PARCEL (8) : N (9): 08/23/00 SPAN: 600-188-15592 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 3, 2000 Mitchell Schwartz 20 Hall Road South Hero, VT 05486 Re: Mitchell Schwartz — Change of Use From General Office Use to Medical Office Use, 329 Dorset Street Dear Dr. Schwartz: Enclosed please fnd a copy of Finding of Facts of the Development Review Board meeting on November 16, 1999 (effective date March 3, 2000). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six months or the approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. f a '�, *;� •'.fir 'trti % '.� , • ,�: .�:,:' � r aS•�'L"�'�'-.-� '2`i,ry<'0►,` `�.�,�'AI�1� � - < 4 iy y ��: ; .fit. �i112�t K`_ ,Tqd• '� .•;� , '+�� - .�', 1. �. vR• J a �.. �G. ter � �'• -� - f; INSURANCE+. L C FOR RENTS • t t 863.3976 • .., . Ywr�c � �+ ' �•as � �., �, a may' • , Y;, ., 1�' �. •,. *1!y ' Irk r JJt m IN R NCB � FO ENT �. i ' Memorandum - Development Review Board November 16, 1999 agenda items November 12, 1999 4) CONSENT AGENDA a) MITCHELL SCHWARTZ M.D. - MEDICAL OFFICE - SITE PLAN & DESIGN REVIEW This project consists of converting a 1360 square foot building from general office use to medical office use. This property located at 329 Dorset Street lies within the CD3 District and Design District 2. It is bounded on the north by Brookwood Drive, on the east by Dorset Street, on the south by a general office building, and on the west by a residence. Access/circulation: Access is provided by a 36 foot curb cut on Brookwood Drive. No changes proposed. Circulation on the site is adequate. Parking: A total of seven (7) spaces are required and nine (9) spaces including one (1) handicapped space and a bike rack are provided. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs is $120, which is not being met. The site is well landscaped and no additional landscaping is recommended. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 12% (maximum allowed is 40%). Overall coverage is 62% (maximum allowed is 90%). The building does not meet the 65 foot setback requirement from a residential district. The building is a noncomplying structure subject to the limitations of Section 26.002 of the zoning regulations. Floor Area Ratio (FAR): The proposed FAR is 0.18 (maximum allowed is 0.5). Traffic: 1TE estimates that the existing use generates 2.03 vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour and the proposed use to generate 5.81 vte's. This represents a 3.78 vte increase. The applicant should be aware that the road impact 2 Memorandum - Development Review Board November 16, 1999 agenda items November 12, 1999 fee is approximately $765. Sewer: No additional sewer allocation requested. Dumpster: No dumpster proposed. Lighting: The existing flood lights on the building will be replaced with downcasting shielded fixtures. Details of these lights should be approved by the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to permit issuance. Design Review: The Design Review Committee on 10/19/99 (minutes will be available at the meeting) ) approved this application. The plan submitted incorporates their recommendations. Recommended conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the change in use will generate 5.81 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 3. All exterior lighting shall consists of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Director of Planning & Zoning prior to installation. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall submit details (cut -sheets) of the exterior light fixtures to the Director of Planning & Zoning for approval. 4. Pursuant to Section 26.105(a), the Development Review Board approves a $120 credit for existing landscaping. 5. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 6. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the medical office. 3 Memorandum - Development Review Board November 16, 1999 agenda items November 12, 1999 7. Any changes to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 5) WESCO, INC. - CONVENIENCE STORE - SITE PLAN This application was continued from the 9/21/99 meeting (minutes enclosed) to allow the City to have a traffic consultant review the applicant's traffic study. This project consists of amending a plan for a service station with seven (7) fueling positions. The amendment consists of: 1) converting the service station to a convenience store including a deli/bakery with 12 seats, 2) constructing a 450 square foot addition for convenience store use, 3) access modifications, and 4) razing an existing single family dwelling and garage. The Zoning Board of Adjustment on 7/12/99 granted the applicant a conditional use permit for the convenience store. This project located at 1108 and 1118 Williston Road lies within the C1 District. It is bounded on the north by a hotel/restaurant (Econolodge), on the west by a hotel/restaurant (Holiday Inn), on the east by a medical office, and on the south by Williston Road. Access/circulation: Access modifications involve the following: 1) the two (2) existing curb cuts for the service station will be reduced in width from 40' to 36', and 2) the existing 39.1' curb cut serving the single family dwelling will be eliminated. These modifications result in the property having two (2) 36' curb cuts on Williston Road and an existing access to the Econolodge property along the rear of the property. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 8.5% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 64.2% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage will be reduced from 65.6% to 63.9% (maximum allowed is 30%). Parking: A total of 18 parking spaces are required and 24 spaces including two (2) handicapped spaces and a bike rack are provided. 4 ecopo (0r LOT SPECIFICATIONS LOT NO: 23-04-02 329 DORSET ST. OWNER: .Ale c-k t Il Sal. wprtL / M D ZONE: CENTRAL DISTRICT 3 PROPOSED USE: OFFICE MEDICAL REQUIRED PARKING: 7 SPACES LOT COVERAGE INFORMATION LOT SIZE- 7700 SF BUILDING FOOTPRINT- 96 4 SF PARKING: 342 3 SF LANDSCAPED AREAS: 16 o3 SF FRONT LAWN: 1540 SF OTHER: 270 SF SETBACK INFORMATION FRONT- 32'—O" DEAR: 54, -0" Plp SIDE (NORTI): 24 - . SIRE (SOIF�): 10'-0" Sr�9 h - F— w w - (n - W cy- HANDICAP CURB CUT ti N/F a N/F 23-04-03 3 DORSET ST. , 4 SHERRY RD. PAUL do ANNE MORWOOD "� I * ROLAND do BEVERLY ALLARD a � (4) 4' ARBORVITAE H/A C (2) 4' ARBORVITAE ; 3' HIGH FENCE 32'-0" I 24'-0" I 54'-0" W/VINE z 7 `dK ,' -- — --- NCAL.* :Rn (23) 4 ARBORVITAE 1._.:: 3' HIGH FENCE 'TREE Lu o • > °O=XISTING 5 _. S•FRUCTURE ;y O I :... N F ' GRAVEL 70'-0" 23 04-01 2 SHERRY RD. '. •"- • PARKING O DERICK & KATHLEN PEPIN I1 S CAL.: ; LOT TREE: - y (. '..... Z6 CAL. i H P TRFE O ' F.H.#269 M. g :A o 1 " 1 N Q ... BROOKWOOD DR. SITE PLAN rTRC E SC&E: 1"=20' 5'o0TFi 13uRL1/l/f t INt VT 10/25/99 MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL MITCHELL SCHWARTZ, 329 DORSET STREET I move the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the design review application of Mitchell Schwartz, MD to change the use of a 1,360 square foot building from general office use to medical office use, 329 Dorset Street. The application also includes the replacement of an existing freestanding sign with a new 27 square foot freestanding sign as depicted on a four (4) page set of plans, page one entitled, "329 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT" and dated 9/28/99 with the following stipulations: 1. Prior to review by the Development Review Board, the plans shall be revised as follows: ros pall a ue#icui cress connection tot a pro -to-the-south._____ 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed sign design is based solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Code Officer. 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 16, 1999 Mitchell Schwartz, MD. 20 Hall Road South Hero, VT 05486 Re: Medical Office, 329 Dorset Street Dear Dr. Schwartz: Enclosed please find a copy of the October 25, 1999 City Center Design Review Committee meeting minutes. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Jo eith, Director Pla *ng & Zoning JW/mcp 1 Encl CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing FT i 1 ►�, ci t v-u,A A k4CW 6+ _ 5t, t y , phone and fax #) `e Lo S 3� -7 (v F-r1 i 6 S .f—,9 q 9 -'3 V 2) APPLICANT (Name, maili address, phone and fax #) V T es-v RC- (k k ( 0 3`22 -erc-7 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 2-0 ( , II / o I `YrFCs %x-) 3I 2 - 9-F- i AAX (8v a) j r 2 - Fro z 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 3 2 J 11,1 f- a t 5 Sn &#-/ram 9 _V T 5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 2 3 -• o Y - oa 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each /separate use) elj'✓Z^'-c-�- '' t.I Lr1e..'k, c '�Yr • .'l�. A,;,h, �o,),_ CXPJ,�'G 'f b) Proposed Uses (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) `C-C n�7 ��1�- jLk Lrewe� c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) W 6 `F sir 44- �sSe- .�� ` `1 s4L• 44 r`� d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to r3` remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees (existing and proposed): - Z ��rI rC, - ; `:� g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above): 7) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing ; % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing > % Proposed .> % 8) COST ESTIMATES a) Building: $ coo - b) Landscaping: $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): fly', y n! 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour (In and out): 3 a 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 12) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATUWL OF AP CANT SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: (Apfrmsp) ElDirector, Planning & Zoning aCompete 11 Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the site plan. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. • Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible) • Survey data (distance and acreage) • Contours (existing and finished) • Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety and size) as required in Section 26.105 of the zoning regulations • Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping • Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways • Zoning boundaries • Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 26.25 of the zoning regulations) • Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 26.253(a) of the zoning regulations) • Location of septic tanks (if applicable) • Location of any easements • Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard • North arrow • Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date • Exterior lighting details (must be down casting and shielded) • Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened) • Bicycle rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations • If Restaurant is proposed, provide number seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats APPLICATION FEE ® New Application $ 60.00* ® Amendment $ 35.00* * Includes $10.00 recording fee (Apfrmsp) CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OCTOBER 25, 1999 The South Burlington City Center Design Review Committee held a meeting on Monday, October 25, 1999 at 7:30 P.M. in the City Hall conference room, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present: Mary Benoit, David Boehm, Donna Leban, Bonnie Pelky, Frank Clark. Also Present: Joe Weith, Director of Planning & Zoning; John Jaeger, Mitchell Swartz, Greg Chioffe, Katie Lesser. 1) Minutes of September 27, 1999 The minutes of September 27, 1999 were approved unanimously. 2) Design review application of Randall Munson to renovate and change the use of an existing 8,060 square foot building consisting of 3,500 square feet of general office use and 4,560 square feet of contractor's yard and shop, 366 Dorset Street. The proposed new uses include 3,500 square feet of general office use and 4,560 square feet of various permitted and conditional uses. John Jaeger presented the application. He described all of the changes made to the plan since it was last reviewed by the Committee. Mr. Clark moved the City Center Design Review Committee approve the design review application of Randall Munson to renovate and change the use of an existing 8,060 square foot building consisting of 3,500 square feet of general office use and 4,560 square feet of contractor's yard and shop, 366 Dorset Street. The proposed new uses include 3,500 square feet of general office use and 4,560 square feet of various permitted and conditional uses as depicted on a three (3) page set of plans, page one entitled, "Site Plan for 366 Dorset Street" prepared by Llewellyn -Howley Inc. and dated 5/7/99, last revised 10/12/99. Mrs. Pelkey seconded. The motion passed unanimously. 3) Design review application of Twin State Signs to install a 6.15 square foot wall sign, 60 San Remo Drive. Mr. Weith informed the Committee that the applicant had withdrawn their application. 4) Design review application of Mitchell Schwartz, MD to change the use of a 1,360 square foot building from general office use to medical office use, 329 Dorset Street. The application also includes the replacement of an existing freestanding sign with a new 27 square foot freestanding sign. Mr. Swartz presented the application. The Committee expressed concern about the gravel lot. Mr. Chioffe said the crushed powder and stone is more expensive than black top. He felt it was more in keeping with the adjacent residential neighborhood. The Committee asked about a vehicular connection to the property to the south. The applicant expressed concern about CITY CENTER DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE OCTOBER 25, 1999 their property being used as a jug handle if the connection were made. The Committee agreed. Mr. Clark moved the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the design review application of Mitchell Schwartz. MD to change the use of a 1,360 square foot building from general office use to medical office use. 329 Dorset Street. The application also includes the replacement of an existing freestanding sign with a new 27 square foot freestanding sign as depicted on a four (4) page set of plans, page one entitled. "329 Dorset Street, South Burlington. VT" and dated 9/28/99 with the following stipulations: 1. Prior to review by the Development Review Board, the plans shall be revised as follows: a) The plans shall be revised to show a location for a potential ground mounted HVAC unit and method of screening. 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed sign design is based solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Code Officer. Ms. Leban seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 5) Design review application of Bette Ann Welch to renovate, expand and change the use of an existing 4600 square foot building, 23 San Remo Drive. The proposal is to construct a 2100 square foot addition and use the building for 5700 square feet of medical office use and two (2) residential units (1200 square feet). Mr. Kennedy presented the application. The plan presented at the meeting was slightly different than the plan submitted to staff. The plan was revised to address staff comments. Mr. Kennedy said they added some sidewalks out to the street and added street trees. They have added more windows to the first floor facade. He said windows along east side will be put in during phase I and then just relocated when phase II is built. Ms. Benoit was concerned about proposed 100 watt metal halide lights. Mr. Kennedy said that he would use 70 watt, but might have to come back to the City if they are not bright enough. Phase I will include parking lot and all landscaping. Committee recommended 20 foot high shoe box lights and 14 foot high decorative light on corner. Committee recommended that a San Remo Drive sidewalk along the north side of the building be constructed as part of Phase I. They were willing to wait three years before the San Remo Drive sidewalk along the east side of the building is constructed. Mr. Kennedy said the overhead wire serving the building will be put underground as part of Phase II. Mr. Kennedy said that each apartment has at least 500 square feet. Mr. Clark moved the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the 2 �`i ,�� sue, � ,1. � � '�� •. � G, �' r�' 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 16, 1999 Mitchell Schwartz, MD. 20 Hall Road South Hero, VT 05486 Re: Medical Office, 329 Dorset Street Dear Dr. Schwartz: Enclosed is a draft copy of the October 25, 1999 City Center Design Review Committee minutes on the above referenced project. If you have any questions, please give me a call. leith, Director ing & Zoning JW/mcp 1 Encl Also Present: Joe Weith, Director of Planning & Zoning; John Jaeger, Mitchell Swartz, Greg Chioffe, Katie Lesser. 1) Minutes of September 27, 1999 The minutes of September 27, 1999 were approved unanimously. 2) Design review application of Randall Munson to renovate and change the use of an existing 8,060 square foot building consisting of 3,500 square feet of general office use and 4,560 square feet of contractor's yard and shop, 366 Dorset Street. The proposed new uses include 3,500 square feet of general office use and 4,560 square feet of various permitted and conditional uses. John Jaeger presented the application. He described all of the changes made to the plan since it was last reviewed by the Committee. Mr. Clark moved the Citv Center Desian Review Committee approve the desian review application of Randall Munson to renovate and change the use of an existing 8,060 square foot building consisting of 3,500 square feet of general office use and 4,560 square feet of contractor's yard and shop, 366 Dorset Street. The proposed new uses include 3,500 square feet of general office use and 4,560 square feet of various permitted and conditional uses as depicted on a three (3) page set of plans, page one entitled, "Site Plan for 366 Dorset Street" prepared by Llewellyn -Howley Inc. and dated 5/7/99, last revised 10/12199. Mrs. Pelkey seconded. The motion passed unanimously. 3) Design review application of Twin State Signs to install a 6.15 square foot wall sign, 60 San Remo Drive. Mr. Weith informed the Committee that the applicant had withdrawn their application. 4) Design review application of Mitchell Schwartz, MD to change the use of a 1,360 square foot building from general office use to medical office use, 329 Dorset Street. The application also includes the replacement of an existing freestanding sign with a new 27 square foot freestanding sign. Mr. Swartz presented the application. The Committee expressed concern about the gravel lot. Mr. Chioffe said the crushed powder and stone is more expensive than black top. He felt it was more in keeping with -the adjacent residential neighborhood. The Committee asked about a vehicular connection to the property to the south The applicant expressed concern about Mr. Clark moved the Citv-_Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the design review application of Mitchell Schwartz. MD to change the use of a 1,360 square foot building from general office use to medical office use. 329 Dorset Street. The application also includes the replacement of an existing freestanding sign with a new 27 square foot freestanding sign as depicted on a four (4) page set of Mans, page one entitled. "329 Dorset Street, South Burlington. VT" and dated 9/28/99 with the following stipulations: 1. Prior to review by the Development Review Board, the plans shall be revised as follows: a) The plans shall be revised to show a location for a potential ground mounted HVAC unit and method of screening. 2. This recommendation for approval of the proposed sign design is based solely on the application's compliance with the design review criteria contained in Section 4 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. The determination of whether or not this application complies with all other requirements contained in the sign ordinance shall be made by the Code Officer. Ms. Leban seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 5) Design review application of Bette Ann Welch to renovate, expand and change the use of an existing 4600 square foot building, 23 San Remo Drive. The proposal is to construct a 2100 square foot addition and use the building for 5700 square feet of medical office use and two (2) residential units (1200 square feet). Mr. Kennedy presented the application. The plan presented at the meeting was slightly different than the plan submitted to staff. The plan was revised to address staff comments. Mr. Kennedy said they added some sidewalks out to the street and added street trees. They have added more windows to the first floor facade. He said windows along east side will be put in during phase I and then just relocated when phase II is built. Ms. Benoit was concerned about proposed 100 watt metal halide lights. Mr. Kennedy said that he would use 70 watt, but might have to come back to the City if they are not bright enough. Phase I will include parking lot and all landscaping. Committee recommended 20 foot high shoe box lights and 14 foot high decorative light on corner. Committee recommended that a San Remo Drive sidewalk along the north side of the building be constructed as part of Phase I. They were willing to wait three years before the San Remo Drive sidewalk along the east side of the building is constructed. Mr. Kennedy said the overhead wire serving; the building, will be put underground as part of Phase IL Mr. Kennedy said that each apartment has at least 500 square feet. Design review application of Bette Ann Welch to renovate. expand and change the use of an existing 4600 square foot building, 23 San Remo Drive. The proposal is to construct a 2100 square foot addition and use the building for 5700 square feet of medical office use and two (2) residential units (1200 square feed as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled, "23 San Remo Drive, South Burlington, Vermont, Elevations" prepared by Michael Dugan and dated 7/25/99 with the following stipulations: 1. Prior to review by the Development Review Board, the applicant shall submit a report which addresses in detail how the proposed plan complies with all design review criteria (Sections 24.401(a)-(i) and 24.402(a)-(i)). The report shall include details and specifications of all proposed materials, lighting, windows/doors, etc. 2. Prior to review by the Development Review Board, the plans shall be revised as follows: a. The elevation plan shall be revised to show the north and east first floor facades of the addition consisting of a majority of see -through glass as required by section 24.401(d) of the zoning_ regulations. b. The site plan shall show the sidewalks on the west and south side of the building extended out to San Remo Drive. A sidewalk shall be shown along San Remo Drive in a location to be approved by the Director of Planning & Zoning. C. The site plan shall show street trees along San Remo Drive at a spacing of 40 feet between trees. Several more trees shall also be included on the property_ d. The dumpster shall be moved to the southwest corner of the property. e. A design detail for the HVAC equipment screening shall be submitted. f. The site plan shall be revised to show surface parking located in a manner that complies with section 14.402 of the zoning regulations. Proposed on -street parking spaces (8' x 22') shall be shown on the plan. g. The plans shall be revised so that the building footprint and architectural drawings are consistent. h. The elevations shall be revised to show building mounted lights and meters. 3. The slope of both the existing and proposed roofs shall be indicated on either the drawings or in the specifications report. 4. Specifications and cut sheets of proposed building mountedlights and new ornamental pole lights shall be submitted prior to review by the Development Review Board. 5. The wattage of the soffit lights shall be 70 watts. Ms. Benoit seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 6) Design review application of Healthy Living to amend an approved planned unit development consisting of 96,800 square feet of general office and shopping center use in four (4) buildings, 100 Dorset Street and 4 Market Street. The amendment consists of expanding the 4 Market Street building by constructing 1,425 square feet of mezzanine space inside the building. Ms. Lesser presented the application. She described the changes to the inside of the building. She said that the owner of the building and land was unwilling to work with her in terms of getting all dumpsters and outside storage moved back to the north side of the building into the enclosed dumpster area. She said she would be willing to move her dumpsters and material to the north side, but could not move other tenants things. The Committee asked Mr. Weith if the Zoning Administrator would be able to issue Ms. Lesser a certificate of occupancy if only her dumpsters are moved in compliance with the approval. Mr. Weith was not sure. He said he would have to discuss this issue with the Zoning Administrator and the City Attorney. Mr. Clark moved the City Center Design Review Committee recommend approval of the Design review application of Healthy Living to amend an approved planned unit development consisting of 96,800 square feet of general office and shopping center use in four (4) buildings, 100 Dorset Street and 4 Market Street. The amendment consists of expanding the 4 Market Street building by constructing 1,425 square feet of mezzanine space inside the building as depicted on a two (2) page set of plans, page one entitled, "Judge Development Corp., 2 Corporate Way, South Burlington, Vt" and dated 1218/97, last revised 10/18/99, and as shown on a five (5) page photo exhibit entitled "Healthy Living Natural Foods Market". Ms. Benoit seconded the motion. The motion passed with 4 votes affirmative and one against. 7) Other Business Next meeting is scheduled for November 22 at 7:30 P.M. Clerk (DRCminutes) MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: November 16, 1999 Agenda Items Date: November 12, 1999 329 DORSET STREET - CHIOFFI - OWNER The concrete sidewalk along Brookwood Drive shall remain in place. Plan doesn't show it. LIME ROCK VILLAGE - AIRPORT PARKWAY Road opening 100 feet in width is excessive and should be narrowed down. THE SCHOOLHOUSE - DORSET STREET Sketch plan prepared by Llewellyn -s Howley dated 9/13/99 is acceptable. HOWARD JOHNSON - PHASE I & II Site plans prepared by Llewellyn - Howley dated 11/7/99 are acceptable. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON - NEW HIGHWAY & BUS GARAGE - PATCHEN ROAD 1. The bus building just east of the existing bus garage may be partly on landfill. 2. Sewer service for the new facility should be shown. 3. On Saturdays, the recycling facility is a very busy place. Traffic is backed up at times to Patchen Road. A three lane entrance drive should be considered. CITY OF SOUTH BUR,LINGTON 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 12, 1999 Mitchell Schwartz, MD. 20 Hall Road South Hero, VT 05486 Re: Medical Office, 329 Dorset Street Dear Dr. Schwartz: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, November 16, 1999 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, r� Raymond 3. Belair, Administrative Officer RIB/mcp Encls MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: November 16, 1999 agenda items Date: November 12, 1999 1) Mitchell Schwartz, MD. 329 Dorset Street Acceptable Dated 10/27/99 2) City of South Burlington Dated 10/18/99 500 Patchen Road Buildings should be sprinklered 3) John Larkin Dated 9/17/99 1 Dorset Street Building should be sprinklered and include a fire alarm 4) The Schoolhouse Dated 10/20/99 Dorset Farms The building should be sprinklered and include a fire alarm 5) The Snyder Group Dated 10/22/99 1550 Hinesburg Road The duplex buildings should be sprinklered or increase the access for the tower truck 6) FAR WATER, LTD Dated 1952 Airport Parkway The buildings should be sprinklered due to the distance from the Fire Station. border iiaii gold-leafed inline afed caduceus on maltz background INCORPORATED 17 Blair Park brand wood composite panel P.O. Box 1048 Williston, VT 05495 , painted letters irmina Black) 3sted panel with _0 o painted letters o g irmina Black) o0 = o painted letters ,oCti a, v want Garde Bold)) ; o ti sign plaques for v .- o ans' names = o o v =Eva, 0 I, gold leafed design Q o m a N C E o o, re -treated wood posts �1 v�tiav C, 0, ° o cw �corative caps, painted Mv71 = o Q -_ of g ti 3 c v o C C M o_ z a v :STANDING SIGN U QNo VIE C14f �l �J_ 1, 11-o �LU �\ J �. i 0 Fes- Two 75 w. spotlights No Text 40 0157irc6 Lac FORM NR-1 COMPUTATION OF TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES PROJECT DATA: (1) "EFFECTIVE DATE" FOR TAX CREDITS: (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS �7'f vph (3) ESTIMATED PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From current tax assessment)units (4) TOTAL FLOOR AREA AFTER CONSTRUCTION s.f. (5) TYPE OF USE (6) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION IMPACT FEES: (7) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (From Form NR-2) FORM NR-2 COMPUTATION OF ROAD IMPACT FEES {1) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE PER PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP END (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS (From form NR-1) (3) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE (1) x (2) (4) PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (from line (3) of Form NR-1) (5) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE- - 1991 BOND $ 226.00 / vte units vte CONSTRUCTION VALUE (From Table ST-9) $ / unit (6) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND (4) x (5) (7) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-10) $ / unit (8) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND / (4) x (7) $ (° (9) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND (From Table ST-11) $ / unit (10) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND% (4) x (9) $ d (11) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION (From Table ST-12) $ / unit (12) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS ( 4 ) x (11) $ �--�-- (13) POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 tl (From line (8) on Form NR-3) 7_ units (14) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND i7 (From Table ST-13) $ � / unit FORM NR-2 (continued) (15) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND�� (13) X (14) $ (16) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-14) $ / unit (17) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND (13) x (16) $ (18) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND (From Table ST-15) $ / unit (19) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND , (13) x (18) $, (20) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION (From Table ST-16) $ / unit (21) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS (13) x (20) $ (22) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (3) - (6) - (8) - (10) - (12) - (15) - (17) - (19) - (21) MITCHELL SCHWARTZ, M.D. DISEASES & SURGERY OF THE SKIN CERTIFIED AMERICAN BOARD OF DERMATOLOGY 50 TIMBER LANE SOUTH BURLINGTON,VT 05403 (802)864-0192 To: Raymond J.13elair from: Mitchell Schwartz, M.D. Re: 329 Dorset Street property Dee.-'4. 1 t;1a_ir: 3 VALLEY CROSSROADS ST. ALBANS, VT 05478 (802) 524-6944 To hopefully prevent any delays in my application for "Design review" and for my "Change of use" permit, I am responding to a memorandum with your preliminary comments to Julic Ann Spaniel D.D.S. dated June 24, 1997 at the time of her application for a medical office addition in 1997. (1) A dumpster will not be used and is therefore not indicated on the plan. (2) For the purpose of calculating sewer requirements, I will be seeing approximately 20 patients per day and will have a receptionist and a medical assistant as employees. (3) Existing building mounted floodlights will be replaced with downcasting shielded fixtures by Progress Lighting #P5643-30 (White 6" square fixture with black anodized aluminum to minimize glare). A copy of the spec sheet is enclosed. (4) A copy of the site plan is enclosed showing the CD3 and R4 boundary lines. (5) Regarding your recommendation that an access connection be provided to the Moorwood property to the south per zoning regulation Section 26.104, 1 strongly believe that this would be appropriate only for a significantly larger parking area with room to direct automobile traffic flow away from pedestrian traffic. Section 26.102(b) of the zoning regulations states that consideration shall be given to "prevention of conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians". As my specialty is dermatology, I see patients of all ages from infants and young children through the elderly. To purposefully allow automobiles traveling to and from adjacent properties to go between the area my patients will be parking and the entrance to my office would be a dangerous mistake. It is therefore very important to me that you do not repeat this recommendation. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely, A ✓3�rA Mitchell Schwartz, M.D. M E M O R A N D U M To: Applicants/Project F1 1,4s From: Raymond J. Belair; South Burlington Planning & Zoning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, June 24, 1997 Agenda Items Date: June 10, 1997 JULIE ANN SPANIEL D.D.S. - MEDICAL OFFICE ADDITION - SITE PLAN --- the minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $1950 which is not being met. Plan should be revised to add plantings to meet the minimum requirement. --- show easement for fire hydrant. --- plan should indicate that the westerly boundary line is the zoning boundary between the CD3 District to the east and the R4 District to the west. --- provide details (cut -sheets) and show locations of all existing and proposed exterior lighting. The existing building mounted floodlights should be replaced with downcasting shielded fixtures. --- show screened dumpster location, if a dumpster will be used. --- provide the number of chairs in the dental office (for sewer calculation). --- -ion does not meet the 65 foot setback a commercial structure from a residential district (Section 25.108 of the zoning regulations). -- show a bike rack as required under Section 24—• zoning regulations. - 94" mat-ed-- -ra-P-fi-c-generation will be reduced so there is no --- staff recommends that an access connection be provided to the Moorwood property to the south as provided in Section 26.104 of the zoning regulations. LEISURE WORLD POOLS, INC. - DISPLAY AREA - SITE PLAN --- the 11/28/89 site plan approval contained a condition that there be no outside storage or trailers used for storage. The property currently has a trailer used for storage and outdoor storage of pallets has been observed. The applicant shouldw be prepared to address these issues at the meeting. --- provide square footage of reta11 floor area in the existing building. P 6" Square P5643-31 81a(.k. P564 -20 firt,}?'lz �P5643.30' aat.e axe: 6' sq., ftt, i xtends 8-7/8" H/(Tit Lamp: f:?rtt? rrieditirr) i)ase l��r+ p, s�tai}4V rr1R•;;,st fir' 1�it7tiv k3Ft-:li? ()Irt:cloor h+,r �+IRR,Rr+�, :ruRl � �lirarfR•a•�. I}� �lRe',�il"ir�?!. Gold Alxak P8703.22 For `"6°itaflt �' Deep Groove Step Baffles P8710-31 ror P5641, P a64 . Rid P5741 P8711-31 F�56437 and P5644 5(1£a<ar(!S.#itCk [aiiodwed aluR' ?r?aarR t(1 ?CitnifTiRl£2 <�#:11i't'. Top Cover Lenses P8797-31 for PS644 •:,riu Rre P8798.31 for P S6412 r:Ylinder P8799.31 foi PS675 y ir.der Adapts t'iR^rl# <:iri() Srts9tt�?".. (;"Isl ar}t (: (ar vvrt.l} bia(* t.nin, Pendant Kit P8741-30 White P8741.20 Bronze P8741-31 Bl add (.aal419 fixi lre, to 6% 12' :gip .18„ ,term} li'1R;'.i.i{TTr11£1. swivei• 6'+ and 12" se tions vv;th coupling. City Center Design Review Committee Page 2 October 19, 1999 The applicant's representative has not yet been able to discuss this issue with the applicant, therefore, we decided to leave this item on the agenda. The applicant should be prepared to address hove the sign complies with the four (4) design review criteria. AGENDA ITEM #4 - MI TCHELL SCHWARTZ - CHANGE OF USE - 329 DORSET STREET[.' This application involves changing the use of a 1,360 square foot building used for general office use to medical office use. The applicant is proposing no changes to the exterior of the building or site. The DRC should note that under section 24.202 of the zoning regulations, the 13R13 is limited to the amount of design improvement it can require for applications which involve only a change in use and no changes to the building or site. The DRB is limited to design improvements the cost of which do not exceed $7000 or 10% of the assessed value of the building, whichever is greater. - The property is located in Design District 3. BUILDING DESIGN Consistent Desi=: The proposal promotes a consistent organization of major elements in terms of window and door arrangement and building materials. Materials: The proposal complies with the zoning as the vinyl clapboard siding will be maintained. Colors & Textures: The existing colors and textures will remain - yellow siding, red asphalt roof shingles, white shudders, trim and rain gutters. Windows and Doors: Windows and doors are well organized and arranged in a pattern. Duman -scale Design Elements: This appears to be promoted through the arrangement of the windows, shutters and doors. Roofs: The existing roof appears to be about a 5 on 12 slope (3 on 12 minimum required). No changes proposed. Orient Buildings to Public Street: The building is well. oriented to Dorset. Street. There is a front door facing Dorset Street and a sidewalk that leads from the door to the Brookwood Drive sidewalk. primary access will be from the door on. the west side of the budding that faces the parking lot. __ City Center Design Review Committee Page 3 October 19, 1999 Rooftop Devices: Existing rooftop devices include a chimney and typical vent pipes. Applicant should address whether more rooftop devices will be needed. Energy Efficiency: Applicant should address this criterion. Pedestrian Promenade along Market Street: N/A SITE DESIGN Landscaping: The site is well landscaped. Special Features: The plans do not show any special features such as HVAC equipment, dumpsters, meter boxes, etc. The applicant should confnm that these features will not be added. Walls/fences: There is an existing iron and granite fence along the front of the property along both Dorset Street and Brookwood Drive. The plans also show a 3' high fence along the south property line preventing vehicular access between this property and the property to the south. Accessible onen apace: done proposed. Circulation: Vehicular access is provided by a curb cut on Brookwood Drive. Section 14.50 requires that parking lots shall be connected with openings between lots to allow traffic flow between lots. Staff recommends that an access connection be provided between this parking lot and the parking lot to the south. Exterior Lighting:. The applicant has indicated that existing flood lights on the building will be replaced with downcasting shielded Mures. Details and cut sheets of proposed lighting should be submitted for approval. Nature's Events: Appears to be met. Security Safety Appears to be met. Streetscape Improvements: All streetscape improvements along Dorset Street and Brookwood Drive have already been implemented. SIGN DESIGN The applicant is proposing to replace the existing free standing sign with a new 27 square foot sign (max 32 square feet allowed). The sign will be a Medex brand wood composite panel with painted lettering. The color is predominantly dark green with light lettering. The pressure treated wood posts will include a decorative cap and the posts will be painted a beige color. The sign City Center Design Review Committee Page 4 October 19, 1999 design appears to comply with. all four (4) design criteria including consistent design, color and texture, materials, and promotion of city center goals. Staff recommends approval of this application with changes recommended above. AGENDA ITEM #5 - BETTE ANN WELCH - CHANGE OF USE AND EXPAND BUILDE'4G - 23 SAN REMO DRIVE This project involves renovation, expansion and changing the use of an existing 4;600 square foot building located at 23 San .Remo Drive. The building is currently used for auto repair, storage and two residential apartment. The proposal is to change the use to medical office and two apartments and construct a 2100 square foot addition. The property is located on the southwest corner of San Remo Drive. It is in Design District 2. Enclosed is a report from the applicant describing design details. BUILDING DESIGN Consistent Design: The proposal promotes a consistent organization of major elements in terms of window and door arrangement and building materials. Materials: The proposal complies with the zoning as the vinyl clapboard siding will be used. Colors & Textures: Colors and textures appear to be harmonious. The applicant is proposing Woodsman Select Gray siding and white trim. The standing seam roof will be Hartford Green. Windows and Doors: Windows and doors are well organized and arranged in a pattern. Section 24.401(d) requires "for sides of buildings that front or face a public street, the majority of the first floor's facade area shall consist of see through glass..." This provision does not appear to be met. The north and east sides of the addition should meet this standard. Human -scale Design Elements: This appears to be promoted through the arrangement of the windows, doors, entrance ways and columns. Roofs The existing and proposed roof pitches should be provided. Zoning requires a minimum S on 12slope for single story and 5 on 12 slope for 2+ stories. Orient Buildings to Public Street: The existing and proposed building does not appear to -be well oriented to San. Remo Drive. The main accesses to the buildings will be from the parking lots on the west and south sides of the building. Section 24.401(g) requires buildings undergoing renovation to include improvements that better relate the building to the public street. The provision states that "such improvements could include the installation of doors along the sides of X)4rL - OFF{ - 0 // ?" i �F',,�G- lcV a/+, �572 1-1/4 p 4��w�f �Fa _ iv��a Ip I N C O R P O R A T E D 17 Blair Park ■ PO Box 1048 ■ Williston, VT 05495 voice 802-872-9906 0 fax 802-872-9910 0 toll free 802-439-6045 0 dsign@together.net 6' Up/Down Square P5644-20 Bronze PS644-30'vlVh':te P5644-31 Black Direas light at anri below, or use 4nvvet sLiecifv P8797-31 tofp !�")Vev size,61 SFi.. 184, ht, Extendl� 8-7/8 -. HAMR 8 Lamps., Two is edium ba.w. (mch 250w 0. PAR-.38 o: ."N"I BR-.40 max, Progre.�slk.lflg (; .. "t, e'i"' �--Z `7 )- Otttdoo.r Top Cover Lenses CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR DESIGN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on required design plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. 1) Approval is being sought for (check all that apply): I Design Plan Approval d� Sign Design Approval 2) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) C T Y`Z'i CJ ✓' N � � j O t T i �/1/ . K G +i (,ii c k � _� /� lJ( /r rn rr'7bti. V ( 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) zdlsz a 12 ,�i i �l( /c� Jt�i ✓u V- �Si�'� 37 2- PFb$ 37 2 &' vZ 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) 4J,tJ:,j, l/ f-z 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 32 61 0c,v re f r�-�',,-/..,j V i 6) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 2-3 v 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Provide a brief description of the improvement or modification for which design review approval is being sought. If sign design approval is being sought, provide a description of the sign(s) type, size and height. s C 6'] Ae'ALi t� it lJ ;? r e : n 41 1y► f/iu ✓awe C1_ /[ ] 1/ �1 �� Ge. G �'► EGLC ; G� �iC'♦! G� , /Vh c%nt,.n�6D L,.y yr�.. t l P.K4{Yiorr ��1f� 4,,; 1,1,:0 c nr �AtacQr`�n.Dr 3-� �.r • . •I I Kiii The information listed on Exhibit A attached shall be submitted along with this application form. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. �f�� .mil/��.L /. t�i-�'�i '''.._�,.�✓J �IGNATURE OF APPL-RANT SIGNATURE O LAND/BUILDING OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this design review application and find it to be: ❑ Complete ❑ Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date (ApformDR) EXHIBIT A DESIGN REVIEW The information listed below must be submitted along with an application for design review. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of all required plans and drawings (e.g., site plan, building elevations, sign details) must be submitted. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board. Design Plan AQDroval • One or more current photographs of the property showing the present condition. • A site plan of the property in accordance with Section 26.10 of the Zoning Regulations • Building elevations, drawn to scale, showing all sides of the building including: • architectural details • exterior equipment located on the roof, walls, and ground • building height • existing and proposed grading • color, type and texture of building material • doors • siding cornices • entablatures • roofing material • moldings and trim • window details including panes of glass, dimensions, shutters, lintels and awnings Sign Design Approval • Plans (drawn to scale) and specifications showing the size, dimensions and color of the sign and its various parts, the style of letter, material of which the sign is to be constructed, and method of attachment to the building or in the ground. • Color sketch of the sign and building as they would appear in relation to each other. • Statement as to method of illumination and intensity of the sign. • Master signage plan containing the following: • an accurate site plan of the property showing the location of buildings, parking lots, driveways and landscaped areas. • computations of the maximum area, number, and height of signs, by sign type (i.e., freestanding, wall, etc.), allowed on the property under the sign ordinance. • computations of the area and height of each sign on the property, both existing signs to remain and proposed new signs. • an accurate indication on the site plan of the proposed location of all signs on the property, both existing signs to remain and proposed new signs. 42C:T—f7z$—°� a 06: bF AM DESIGN SIGNS p�sign Signs, inc. 17 Blair Park p (). BOX 1 u4B l',Iflslon: \IT 054D5 $�2572`�91E P. 02 l� Julie Ann Spaniel, D.D.S., Inc. Julie Ann Spaniel, D.D.S. GENERAL DENTISTRY • 1 Kennedy Drive • South Burlington, VT 05403 • (802 ) 864-189 7 -2 P City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 10, 1997 Julie Ann Spaniel, D.D.S. One Kennedy Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Medical Office Addition, 329 Dorset Street Dear Dr. Spaniel: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Monday, June 16, 1997. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sinceraely, Raymo d J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls cc: Greg Chioffi M E M O R A N D U M To: Applicants/Project Figls From: Raymond J. BelaiJ South Burlington Planning & Zoning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, June 24, 1997 Agenda Items Date: June 10, 1997 JULIE ANN SPANIEL D.D.S. - MEDICAL OFFICE ADDITION - SITE PLAN --- the minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $1950 which is not being met. Plan should be revised to add plantings to meet the minimum requirement. --- show easement for fire hydrant. --- plan should indicate that the westerly boundary line is the zoning boundary between the CD3 District to the east and the R4 District to the west. --- provide details (cut -sheets) and show locations of all existing and proposed exterior lighting. The existing building mounted floodlights should be replaced with downcasting shielded fixtures. --- show screened dumpster location, if a dumpster will be used. --- provide the number of chairs in the dental office (for sewer calculation). --- the proposed addition does not meet the 65 foot setback requirement for a commercial structure from a residential district (Section 25.108 of the zoning regulations). --- the plan should show a bike rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. --- estimated traffic generation will be reduced so there is no traffic impact fee. --- staff recommends that an access connection be provided to the Moorwood property to the south as provided in Section 26.104 of the zoning regulations. LEISURE WORLD POOLS, INC. - DISPLAY AREA - SITE PLAN --- the 11/28/89 site plan approval contained a condition that there be no outside storage or trailers used for storage. The • property currently has a trailer used for storage and outdoor storage of pallets has been observed. The applicant shouldw be prepared to address these issues at the meeting. --- provide square footage of retail floor area in the existing building. M E M O R A N D U M To: Joe Weith, South Burlington City Planner From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: Plans Reviewed for June 24, 1997 Date: June 10, 1997 1. JULIE ANN SPANIEL, D.D.S. Dated 6/4/97 329 Dorset Street Acceptable 2. LEISURE WORLD, INC. Dated 6/6/97 1245 Airport Parkway Acceptable M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: June 24, 1997 Agenda Items Date: June 6, 1997 GREGORY CHIOFFI - 329 DORSET STREET 1. The sidewalk along the Brookwood Drive side shall remain in place across the entrance drive. Plan shows it removed or non- existent. 2. Plan prepared by Forcier, Aldrich and Associates dated 4/17/97 is acceptable. N/F N/F 23-04-03 333 DORSET ST. , 4 SHEERRRY RD. PAUL & ANNE MORWOOD I ROLAND & BEVERLY ALLARD (4) 4' ARBORVITAE (2) 4' ARBORVITAE i 3' HIGH FENCE LOT SPECIFICATIONS W/VINE 32'-0" I 24'-0" I 54'-0" LOT NO: 23-04-02 329 DORSET ST. - - - - - - — OWNER: GREGORY CHIOFFI... ........ ' ' = (D ZONE: CENTRAL DISTRICT 3 _ (23) 4' ARBORVITAE PROPOSED USE: OFFICE MEDICAL REQUIRED PARKING: 7 SPACES (15 CAL. z 3' HIGH FENCE Q TREE•"_- �- EISTING LOT COVERAGE INFORMATION w =m STRUC URE O o✓ . �- :':`:': GRAVEL 70'-0" 23 04-01 2 SHERRY RD. LOT SIZE: 7700 SF to : i _ . „ . _ ..... PARKING O DERICK & KATHLEN PEPIN BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 1410 SF 15 CAL.:: • :: LOT "; W : (TREE:::.:-.::-:•:. , PARKING: 3360 SF LANDSCAPED AREAS: 1120 SF i AD' NEW )ITION 15'-0" FRONT LAWN: 1540 SF 0 :: O I.......".. OTHER: 270 SF I -' ' ' ' -"-'- . 3ia'-6" ...... F.H.#269 . . o SETBACK INFORMATION" -- =- - -- -- - FRONT: 22'-6" CURBICAPCUT RELAWN-IV REAR: 47'-0" SIDE (NORTH): 9'-6" BROOKWOOD DR. JUN Q 4 1997 SIDE (SOUTH): 10'-0" SITE PLAN City of So. Burlington SCALE: 1 "=20' -0E5IGNED PROJECT NO. Porcier.4/drich SITE PLAN -ADDITION °RAB_R 97019 associates . . (CHECKED (PM)i CHECKED (PE), FIGURE N0. Consulting Engineers , 329 DORSET STREET Park Avenue 05495 --. —_ !SCALE III �802) 879-7733 GREGORY CHIOFFI As NOTED 802) 879-1742 (Fax) BATE SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT 14/17/97 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 10, 1997 Julie Ann Spaniel, D.D.S. One Kennedy Drive South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Medical Office Addition, 329 Dorset Street Dear Dr. Spaniel: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Monday, June 16, 1997. If you have any questions, please give me a call. SincoVely, Raymon7d�.J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp Encls cc:- Greg Chioffi M E M O R A N D U M To: Applicants/Project Fil,(As 13 From: Raymond J. Belair,R'South Burlington Planning & Zoning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, Date: June 10, 1997 June 24, 1997 Agenda Items JULIE ANN SPANIEL D.D.S. - MEDICAL OFFICE ADDITION - SITE PLAN --- the minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $1950 which is not being met. Plan should be revised to add plantings to meet the minimum requirement. --- show easement for fire hydrant. --- plan should indicate that the westerly boundary line is the zoning boundary between the CD3 District to the east and the R4 District to the west. --- provide details (cut -sheets) and show locations of all existing and proposed exterior lighting. The existing building mounted floodlights should be replaced with downcasting shielded fixtures. --- show screened dumpster location, if a dumpster will be used. --- provide the number of chairs in the dental office (for sewer calculation). --- the proposed addition does not meet the 65 foot setback requirement for a commercial structure from a residential district (Section 25.108 of the zoning regulations). --- the plan should show a bike rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. --- estimated traffic generation will be reduced so there is no traffic impact fee. --- staff recommends that an access connection be provided to the Moorwood property to the south as provided in Section 26.104 of the zoning regulations. LEISURE WORLD POOLS, INC. - DISPLAY AREA - SITE PLAN --- the 11/28/89 site plan approval contained a condition that there be no outside storage or trailers used for storage. The • property currently has a trailer used for storage and outdoor storage of pallets has been observed. The applicant shouldw be prepared to address these issues at the meeting. --- provide square footage of retail floor area in the existing building. M E M O R A N D U M To: Joe Weith, South Burlington City Planner From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: Plans Reviewed for June 24, 1997 Date: June 10, 1997 1. JULIE ANN SPANIEL, D.D.S. 329 Dorset Street Acceptable 2. LEISURE WORLD, INC. 1245 Airport Parkway Acceptable Dated 6/4/97 Dated 6/6/97 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: June 24, 1997 Agenda Items Date: June 6, 1997 GREGORY CHIOFFI - 329 DORSET STREET 1. The sidewalk along the Brookwood Drive side shall remain in place across the entrance drive. Plan shows it removed or non- existent. 2. Plan prepared by Forcier, Aldrich and Associates dated 4/17/97 is acceptable. SITE PLAN CHECK LIST --- Lot drawn to scale --- Survey data (distances and lot size) --- Contours (existing and finished). --- Existing vegetation and natural features. - Proposed landscaping (number, variety and size) equal or greater than the required amount in section 19.104 of the Zoning Regulations. --- Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings. -� Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. Zoning boundaries -� Number and location of parking spaces. (RV parking for multi- family projects over 25 units). - /� Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. ��/��' Location of septic tanks (if applicable). - Location of any easements. - ✓Lot coverage information: Building, overall and front yard. t/ --- Location of site (Street # and lot #). --✓ North arrow - Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. -� Exterior lighting details (must be downcasting and shielded). Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened). - ✓ Existing and proposed sidewalks (public). c/ -� Sewer calculation --- Height of new construction. -- Setbacks (residential district, planned r.o.w., Interstate). --- C.O. Zone .-- Bike racks --- Traffic generation --- Traffic Impact fees --- PUD/PCD standards --- Airport Approach cone --- Outside storage/display --- F.A.R. --- Lot merger agreement --- Setback from planned r.o.w. --- If boundary line adjustment, need subdivision? --- Nonresidential use setback from Residential District CITY OF SOUTH BURLI, .tON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone 2) APPLICANT ( name, address, phone-0--re- A.1en,-7e-d(4 -/ J 3) CONTACT PERSON ( name, address, phone 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE(S) Ueh f a / 0 4 61 � e.,- 1-h4 S � l � ,9riZ7Z':. 7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units, maximum height and # floors, square �feet per/ floor) /rT Od/T/ D/i D S <✓ 7`�X ��7 a 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES c, 3 !< �� t' -� 1�Ck r "7im e. 9) LOT COVERAGE: building t1, %; landscaped areas 3e��O % building, parking, outside storage' ,7 % 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $r ??�� 4 , Landscaping $ fi2DDa.QO Other Site Improvements (please list with cost-) $ 11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: ��l.x, / 9V 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) 2z[_. Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon ; 12-1p.m. .3 ; 1-2 p.m. ; 2-3 p.m. 3-4 p.m. '' 4-5 p.m._/ ; 5-6 p.m. ; 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: DATE OF SUBMISSION DATE OF HEARING SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT PLEASE SUBMIT FIVE COPIES AND ONE REDUCED COPY (11 X 17) OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Lot drawn to scale (20 foot scale if possible). Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping. Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. Proposed landscaping plan (number, variety and size) equal to or greater than the required amount in the Zoning Regulations. Number and location of Parking Spaces: (9' x 18') with 22 or 24 foot aisles as required. Number and location of handicapped spaces as required. (see Table 26-1 of zoning regulations). Location of septic tanks (if applicable). Location of any easements. Lot coverage information: Building footprint, building, parking, and outside storage, landscaped areas and front yard. Location of site (street # and lot #). North arrow Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. Cityof South Burlington g 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 October 25, 1994 Mr. Greg Chioffi Chioffi, Bessette & Rose 22 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: 329 Dorset Street Dear Greg: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This letter will advise you that you are in violation of Section 26.10 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Section 26.10 Site Plan Review requires that you secure Planning Commission approval prior to making any alterations and or changes to a site. The project located at 329 Dorset Street has been altered in that the parking lot has been increased in size. Pursuant to 24 V . S . A Section 4444, you have seven (7) days in which to cease this violation. In order to cure this violation you must file for site plan approval with City Planner Mr. Joseph Weith. Your failure to take action could be subject to legal action and fines of up to $50.00 per day for each day that the violation continues. If you do not agree with this "Notice of Violation" you may appeal it to the Zoning Board of Adjustment in writing within fifteen (15) days of this date. If you have any questions pertaining to this matter, please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcp E CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF: 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 3) PROPOSED USE (s) t '0� 1� ;, 4) SIZE OF PROJECT: (i.e. Building Square Footage, #units, maximum height and #floors 241-0- 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full and part time): — 6) LOT COVERAGE: Building � ! Parking, Oti— e y 5tlq t (ZS 8) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings: $ Q Landscaping $34___ Other Site Improvements: (Please list with cost) $1tI17c�� 9) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE:-J��—O� — ---- — 10) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out) _3 eq.eS Aj/31/6&p Thin) 11) PEAK HOUR(s) OF OPERATION: 12) PEAK DAY(s) OF OPERATION: SIGNAT RE OF APPLICANT -- r SITE PLANS MUST SHOW THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION (PLEASE SUBMIT 4 COPIES) -_4W+0_ Lot Drawn to Scale (20' preferred) Location of Streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings and landscaping Existing and proposed curbcuts, pavement, walkways Proposed landscaping plan (#, variety, size) equal to or greater than required amount in Zoning Regulations # and location of parking spaces (9'xl8') with 22 or 24 foot aisles as required # and location of handicapped spaces Location of Septic Tanks (etc) if on -site sewer Location of any easements Lot coverage ratio for building alone (foot print) and building, parking and outside storage Location of site (street # or lot #) Name of person or firm preparing Site Plan and date PLANNING COMMISSION 8 OCTOBER 1985 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a Regular Meeting on Tuesday, 8 October 1985, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present Mary -Barbara Maher, Chairman; Judith Hurd, John Belter, Peter Jacob, John Dooley, James McClary, William Burgess Others Present Jane Bechtel Lafleur, City Planner; Ernest Ross, Randy Echo, Charles Cannata, Mary Holland, James Sector, Cathy Racine, Royce Chambers, Robert Krebs, Tony Perry, Dick Kellogg, Walter Houghton, John Trevithick, j. Minutes of September 17, 1985 It was noted that on p. 8, 1. 10, the words .."and their project would abut directly to that." should be deleted. Mrs. Hurd moved that the minutes of September 17, 1985 be approved as amended. Mr. Jacob seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. Minutes of September 24, 1985 Mrs. Lafleur noted that on p. 5, para. 2, the opening sentences should read: "Ms. Huffman explained that they are acquiring the site now occupied by Otter Valley Trucking on Green Mountain Drive. The 3-acre lot under consideration at 1620 Shelburne Rd. will contain..." On p. 1, 6 lines from the bottom, the words "phasic" should read "phasing." On p. 3, para 1 of the PUBLIC HEARING, the word "though" should read "thought." On p. 8, next to last paragraph, the word "torm" should read "storm." Mrs. Hurd moved that the minutes of 9/24/85 be approved as amended. Mr. Jacob seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. Continue site plan discussion of E. Ross for conversion of a single family dwelling to an insurance office at 329 Dorset Street. Mr. Jacob stepped down during this discussion. Mr. Ross advised that where it will have th when the garage comes a parking space remai e n the parking is now in the side yard least impact on neighbors. If and down, that area should be graveled and there. Mrs. Hurd expressed PLANNING COMMISSION 8 OCTOBER 1985 PAGE 2 disappointment that there was no screening. Mrs. Lafleur said that if parking is not in the rear, there is no dramatic change from what is there now. Mrs. Hurd asked that if in the future more parking is needed that the applicant return to the Planning Commission. Mr. McClary suggested recommending to the City Council that there be no parking on Brookwood along this property to Dorset Street. Mrs. Lafleur noted there were letters from both adjoining neighbors who have no problem with this plan. Mr. Dooley moved that the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Ernest E. Ross for the conversion of the existing single-family dwelling to an insurance office at 329 Dorset Street as depicted on a plan entitled "Bessette and Ross, 329 Dorset Street, South Burlington" prepared J.H. Stuart with the following stipulations: 1. Credit is granted for existing landscaping valued at over The required $300. 2. The parking area shall be gravelled and drain towards Brookwood Drive. 3. If the garage is removed, the applicant shall return to the Commission for site plan approval of any use of the area covered by the garage. 4. The Commission reserves the right to amend this site plan approval after 6 months from the date of approval based on a review by the City Planner of the use of the lot. 5. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months. Mr. Burgess seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. 3, Continue Public Hearing for Final Plat of Prime Properties for the conversion of a 2-family dwelling to a 4-family structure at 62 East Terrace Mr. Echo indicated that the plan has been revised to eliminate the circular drive in front and to widen the existing drive to 18.feet expanding to 24 feet in the rear. There will be a total of 9 parking spaces. Curbs will be replaced per the City Manager's specifications, and the drive will be upgraded to a quality gravel road. Mrs. Holland of 55 East Terrace asked if there was consideration given to having one side of the street parking. Mr. Dooley said he didn't think that was the answer to the problems on that street but they could ask the Council to study the problem. Mr. Sector said he was concerned about the steep gravel slope SPOKES, FOLEY & STITZEL ATTORNEYS AT LAW BURLINGTON, VERMONT STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. In re: Laura Brooks and Ernest ) Ross ) NOTICE OF APPEAL NOW COMES the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, by and through its attorneys, Spokes, Foley & Stitzel, and appeals to the Chittenden Superior Court the Findings and Decision of the City of South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment in regard to the application of Laura Brooks and Ernest Ross for approval under §17.602 of the City of South Burlington Zoning Regulations Conditional Uses and a variance from §17.604 of the Zoning Regulations Dimensional Requirements in order to convert an existing residential dwelling into an insurance office. The findings and decision of the Zoning Board of Adjustment were determined at its meeting of September 9, 1985. In this decision, the City of South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment approved the conditional use and variance of lot size in frontage contrary to the City's Zoning Regulations and the Vermont Planning and Development Act. Appellant requests a trial de novo. Dated at Burlington, Vermont, this 8th day of October, 1985. r' i By: SPOKES, FOLEY & STITZEL Susan L. Boyle SPOKES, FOLEY & STI°TZEL ATTORNEYS AT LAW 184 SOUTH WINOOSKI AVENUE P. 0. BOX 986 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-0986 RICHARD A. SPOKES (802) 862-64S I JAMES D. FOLEY (802) 863-2857 STEVEN F. STITZEL ISAAC N. P. STOKES SUSAN L. BOYLE October 8, 1985 COUNSEL Mr. David Boehm, Clerk City of South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05401 Re: In re: Laura Brooks and Ernest Ross Dear Mr. Boehm: Enclosed please find a Notice of Appeal from the City of South Burlington Board of Adjustment's decision of September 9, 1985 along with our check payable to the Chittenden Superior Court in the amount of $35.00. We are also enclosing five (5) copies of the Notice of Appeal for transmittal to any interested parties. We have been requested by the City, by and through the City Council, to contest the Zoning Board's decision. Please file the enclosed Notice of Appeal with the Chittenden Superior Court. Very truly yours, Susan L. Boyle SLB/djg Enclosures CC: William Szymanski October 17, 1985 Ernest Ross 329 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Site plan at 329 Dorset Street Dear Mr. Ross: Enclosed are the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting at which your site plan was approved. Please be sure to meet all of the stipulations set forth in the motion. Sincerely, Jane B. Lafleur, City Phanner JBL/mcp 1 Encl 10/7 '15 JBL MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Ernest E. Ross for the conversion of the existing single-family dwelling to an insurance office at 329 Dorset Street as depicted on a plan entitled "Bessette and Ross, 329 Dorset Street, South Burlington" prepared by J.H. Stuart with the following stipulations: 1) Credit is granted for existing landscaping valued at over the required $300. 2) The parking area shall be gravelled and drain towards Brookwood Drive. 3 )-W+Ten the garage is removed, that a e asT77-1 1 be gravelled for additional parking. In the meantime, one vehicle shall be parked in the garage. 4) The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months. A0 Kvt,, exxv. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Jane Bechtel Lafleur,,City Planner \� Re: October 8, 1985 agenda items Date: October 4, 1985 2) E. ROSS,`' 329 DORSET STREET PLEASE VISIT THIS SITE IN DAYLIGHT HOURS, PRIOR TO MEETING. The applicant has prepared a revised plan showing the parking at the rear of the building rather than the front yard as originally proposed. The back yard is very small and has two very large trees that should not be removed for parking. The only alternative seems to be to park on the northerly side of the building, perpendicular to the street. The owner's car should either be parked in the garage or.,if the garage is re- moved.,the garage area should be gravelled for his car. There will be a greater impact on the adjacent neighborhood if the modest back yard becomes a parking lot. Furthermore, the front yard can remain as it is to further lessen the impact of this use change. 3) PRIME PROPERTIES, EAST TERRACE The applicant has removed the proposed front yard driveway and shows an expanded 24 foot circular driveway around the rear to meet Chief Goddetts concerns. See Bill Szymanski's comments regarding the slope of the driveway. This is an improvement from the "parking lot" in the front. 4) LTH, HARBOR HEIGHTS, HARBOR VIEW ROAD I expect to receive an analysis from Wagner, Heindel and Noyse on erosion impact of this change from 30 multi -family units to 12 single-family lots. If it is not available, this item should be postponed until October 22, 1985. According to our regulations, (section 19.20) you may approve a lot with no road frontage if it meets the 20 foot minimum width, if there are no more than 3 lots served and if it is served by permanent legal arrangements. This revision is an improvement to the multi -family layout and provides a better transition between the single and multi -family units since the multi -family in Cluster A are separated by the conservation zone and cluster B is separated by the street. / ZV M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: October 8, 1985 agenda items Date: 10/4/85 2) BESSETTE & ROSS, 329 DORSET STREET 1. Not good but better than first plan. 3) PRIME PROPERTIES, 62 EAST TERRACE 1. The steepest road grade is 16.6% or 16.6' in 100' for a distance of about 50 feet. This grade will not be a problem. 2. The curb openings shall flair out for turning movements. The widened openings shall include new depressed concrete curb. No simply breaking out the existing barrier curb. 5) PERRY'S FISH HOUSE, 1080 SHELBURNE ROAD No comments. 6) VALLEY AIR SERVICE, AIRPORT 1. It is my understanding based on my conversation with Walter Houghton, that planning is underway for an access road to the area from the Williston Road, National Guard Road which is expected to be constructed next year. 7) ROBERT SHAND, VERMONT CUSTOM SHEET METAL, LOT #1 BELTER INDUSTRIAL PARK 1. Driveway should be at least 20' in width with 10' return radii to accommodate commercial vehicles. 2. Driveway will require a culvert. 3. I would recommend entire lot especially the intersection corner be mowed at least once a year to prevent growth of brush. October 4, 1985 Ernest Ross Bessette & Ross 2071 Williston Road P.O. Box 9378 South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: 329 Dorset Street, Office Dear Mr. Ross: Enclosed are the agenda znd a copy of my memo to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present to represent your request. Sincerely, Jane Bechtel Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp Encls PLANNING COMMISSION 17 SEPTEMBER 1985 PAGE 4 in credit is granted for existing landscaping. 2. The applicant shall obtain conditional use approval from the ZBA prior to permit. 3. The building permit shall be obtained within 6 months. Mr. Jacob seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. Consider site plan application of E. Ross for conversion of_� single-family dwelling to an insurance office building at 329' (Dorset Street Mr. Jacob stepped down during this discussion due to a conflict of interest. Mrs. Lafleur explained this is an existing single family house, 864 sq. ft. Three parking spaces would be required; the applicant is proposing 5. Mrs. Lafleur recommended removing the angled parking place. Mr. Ross said he didn't want people parking in the street. There is a garage in the rear. Members felt parking would be better in the rear with a buffer to neighboring backyards. Mrs. Maher suggested Mr. Ross get a professional to design a parking plan. Mrs. Hurd moved that the discussion be continued until the first meeting in October. Mr. McClary seconded, and the motion passed unanimously. Mr. Jacob resumed his seat; however, Mr. Belter stepped down during the following discussion due to a conflict of interest. Consider site plan of Ray Cooley for construction of a 4875 sq. ft. office/warehouse on lot #6, Eithan Allen Farm Indus- trial Park. Mr. Kuhn advised there are 8 parking spaces to the right with the office center to the southeast and repair facilities to the rear. Vehicles will be parked in the rear. The office will operate year round; the vehicle repair will be in the winter. Most vehicles will be stored inside. There will be 4 office employees and 4 maintenance -repair people. Mr. Dooley suggested marking the parking area in the rear. Mr. Dooley moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of R_y Cooley, James Lamphere, agent, for the construction of a 4875 sq. September 25, 1985 Ernest Ross 2071 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: 329 Dorset Street, Site Plan Dear Mr. Ross: Enclosed are the September 17, 1985 Planning Commission meeting minutes. The Commission will continue discussion of your plan on October 8, 1985. Please be sure to have revised plans to me by October 1, 1985. Sincerely, Jane Bechtel Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp Encl 4 k CC 14� 1(ti b W' Memorandum September 17, 1985 agenda items September 13, 1985 Page 2 Parking: 45 spaces are proposed as required. Landscaping and Screening: The project requires $6000 in land- scaping. The applicant proposes $3000 in new landscaping and requests credit for $3000 of existing. The existing land- scaping consists of yews, 3 spruce, a cedar hedge, 2 willows and 3 pines which is sufficient. The applicant will be placing additional landscaping to buffer the Cadey property. 5) ROSS, 329 DORSET STREET The applicant proposes to convert a single-family dwelling to an insurance office. This is the first application under the new Transitional District. It was approved by the Zoning Board of Adjustment on September 9, 1985. Parking and Circulation: Five parking spaces are proposed, 3 are required for this 864 square foot office. The parking is located in the front yard and along the northern end of the building off of Brookwood. Four spaces may be adequate and the angled space eliminated if the applicant agrees. This would be more aesthetically attractive. Access: Access will be from Brookwood Drive Landscaping and Screening: A large pine will the Brookwood corner to accommodate parking. not be used for parking and has several large as it is presently. be removed from The backyard will trees. ".'e Other: The property is in Traffic Overlay Zone 5; nine trips per peak hour are permitted. According to the ITE data, in- surance offices with 3 employees produce 1.5 trips during the peak hour. 6) COOLEY, LOT #6, ETHAN ALLEN FARM INDUSTRIAL PARK The applicant proposes to construct a one-story office/warehouse building on lot #6 of the Belter subdivision. The lot is 1.32 acres and is zoned Industrial -Commercial. Access and Circulation: The 30 foot wide curb cut is at the northern end of the cul de sac. Circulation is adequate. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: September 17, 1985 agenda items Date: September 13, 1985 3) ECHO, 62 EAST TERRACE No Comments 4) BLODGETT SUPPLY COMPANY, FARRELL STREET No Comments 5) ROSS INSURANCE OFFICE, 329 DORSET STREET Parking area shall drain toward Dorset Street and Brookwood Drive. 6) COOLEY OFFICE BUILDING, BELTER DEVELOPMENT No Comments 7) CREATIVE DESIGN CABINET SHOP, WILLISTON ROAD 1. There should be a wider landscaped buffer zone between the residential property to the east. 2. There is a wider strip between the edge of the traveled way of Williston Road and the rights -of -way thgn shown on site plan. Williston Road r.o.w. is 4 rods (66'). 3. It appears that part of the site will drain toward the property to the east. Site shall be graded so that this does not happen. 4. It will be very difficult for delivery trucks to m1neuver hound the south east corner of this building. 8) PREMO, BEST WESTERN, SHELBURNE ROAD No Comments MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From; James W. Goddette Sr., Fire Chief Re; September 17,1985 Agenda Items Date; September 12,1985 1) Redwood Best Western -------------------- Plans were reviewed on the remolding of the restaurant area and at this time the department does not see a problem with this project. doss Insurance Off 2 ice; At this time I do n-t see a problem with giving proper fire protection. 3) Vermont Structural Steel Property Hinesburg Road ; ------------------------------------------------ Plans reviewed and the following must be insta-led, A. Water line installed per water dept. standards. B. 15 Fire hydrants installed as marked on plan. 4) Cooley Office Center; Lot #6 Ethan Allen Drive -------------------- ------------------------ Plans reviewed and at this time I do not see a problem with giving fire protection. 5) Blodgett Supply Co. Farrell Street; ---------------------------------- More information needed. A meeting is set up for Friday September 13,1985 With Mr. Spitz and the Blodgett C . ( O\OzOt .�( t�QAt\ t'� 4,�,. ,, 6) East Terr Apt. Complex; ---------------------- Plans reviewed and the only correction needed is the 10' Road must be inlarged to at least 18' for fire lane and no less the 24' near complex for fire equipment. 7) Creative Design Williston Road; ------------------------------- Plans reviewed and only problem found is the road behind the building must be no less then 18'. September 13, 1985 Ernest Ross One Slocum Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: 329 Dorset Street office Dear Mr. Ross: Enclosed are a copy of the agenda and my memo to the Planning Commission. Please be sure someone is present to represent your application. Sincerely, Jane Bechtel Lafleur, City Planner JBL/mcp Encls No Text �I C) G^ -t w i I FMO� ev 4 oil ��y 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 9, 2000 Mitchell Schwartz, M.D. 20 Hall Road South Hero, VT 05486 Re: 1360 sq. #l. building conversion to medical office use, Mitchell Schwartz, M.D. 329 Dorset Street Dear Dr. Schwartz: Enclosed is a copy of the November 16, 1999 Development Review Board minutes on the above referenced project. Please note that the conditions of approval are as per the Zoning Administrator's memorandum of November 12, 1999. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Planning & Zoning Assistant Encls City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 November 4, 1994 Mr. Gregory Chioffi 17 Adirondack Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 329 Dorset Street Dear Greg: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Your plan to alter the parking area at 329 Dorset Street has been reviewed by the Planning and Zoning staff. We hereby grant you administrative approval based on the following conditions: 1) That a fifteen foot landscaped buffer strip be maintained along the westerly property line (a zoning requirement setforth under Section 25.108 of the City by haws). 2) That runoff be pitched towards Brookwood Drive. 3) That any yard lighting be down shielded fixtures, and screened from adjoining residential properties. Alterations to your parking lot are accepted due to the highway improvements to Brookwood Drive which will result in your losing parking spaces. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Very t uly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcp City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7965 October 25, 1.994 Mr. Greg Chioffi Chioffi, Bessette & Rose 22 Church Street Burlington, Vermont 05401. Re: 329 Dorset Street Dear Greg: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 This letter will advise you that you are in violation of Section 26.1.0 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Section 26.10 Site Plan. Review requires that you secure Planning Commission approval. prior to making any alterations and or changes to a site. The project located at 329 Dorset Street has been altered in that the parking lot has been increased in size. Pursuant to 24 V . S . A Section 4444, you have seven. (7) days in which to cease this violation. In order to cure this violation you must file for site plan approval with. City Planner Mr. Joseph Weith. Your failure to take action could be subject to legal action and fines of up to $50.00 per day for each day that the violation continues. If you do not agree with this "Notice of Violation" you may appeal it to the Zoning Board of Adjustment in writing within fifteen (15) days of this date. If you have any questions pertaining to this matter, please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcp Gregory T. Chioffi 17 Adirondack St. So. Burlington, VT 05403 October 31, 1994 Mr. Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer, & The Zoning Board of Adjustment City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 329 Dorset Street Dear Dick: This letter is to codify our two previous conversations, and to correct the errors in your letter dated October 25, 1994. On September 25, 1994, after a site inspection of the above mentioned prop- erty, we discussed a possible change in the parking area. I told you that the parking area would remain as per the APPROVED site plan. Subsequently a demolition permit for the existing garage, including removal of the slab, was applied for, fees pain, and permit granted. The Contractor named on the Permit is Homer Dubois Excavating, and on Oct- ober 17, 1994, he arrived with a twin axle dump truck and DROTT, and com- pleted the job. A number of Dead Trees, Bushes and Roots were also removed from the site, along with the concrete slab, and all areas subsequently filled. No GRAVEL, STONE, PLANT MIX, BLACKTOP or any other hard surface dressing necessary to park upon was brought in. Thr. existing gravel parking area, as per the APPROVED SITE PLAN, still exist.^, ar,,d was NEVER changed. THERE IS NO VIOLATION. On October 25, 1994, you again visited i:1'(=: ;-_.,_.... .-;;7d I told you that no expansion was made, and I planned to r: ,,..;-king as per the APPROVED PLAN. YOU requested that I change the...��a_use I had such a large, pre-existing, opening on the strer-'-, Burlingto- Sheet Department is currently putting Curbs & Si�ie�% a;, tie parking area, and a change would permit the city to use a cut, and permit ingress and egress differently. I voluntarily 7,ur+.: c' Lo this; modification and application, for the benefit of the neighboncooc, ru d the City. I will not, however, be forced to do this under the guise of violating Section. 26.10 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. If you would be so kind as to send a corrective letter, I will then vol- untarily agree to request a change in the parking area. In the absence of a letter, please consider this a formal APPEAL TO THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. Also, please have the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON open the curb to the dimensions of the APPROVED SITE PLAN, as State Law is clear on the Municipalities' procedures, duties and obligations under eminent domain. Thank you. sincerely, /Ij? Gregory T. Chioffi cc: Paul Jarvis, Esquire 95 St. Paul Street Burlington, VT 05401 No Text September 11, 1985 Mr. Ernest Ross P.O. Box 9378 South Burlington, Vermont 05402 Dear Mr. Ross: Be advised that your request has been granted approval by the Zoning Board of Adjustment according to the plan on file at this office. Your proposal is subject to site plan approval by the Planning Commission. Formal findings will be issued at a later Gate. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcg BROOKS/ROSS 329 Dorset Street Effective September 9, 1985 Area in question will be transitional district Section 17.602 Conditional uses business and professional offices - proposed insurance office Section 17.604 area, density and dimensional requirements Minimum lot 10,000 square feet with 170 feet frontage - existing 75' x 125' = 9,375 square feet. Minimum side yard 15 feet - existing 10 feet (south side) 25% building coverage = 2,343 square feet 864 square feet = 9% coverage 60% total coverage - 5,625 square feet 2298 square feet total coverage = 24% I --- ------- JY- PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL In accordance with Section 4443(c), Title 24 The South Burlington City Council will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington'City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, August 5, 1985 at 7:30 P.M. to consider proposed amendments to the 1982 South Burlington. Zoning Regulations as previously amended. The principal provisions of the proposed amendments may be summarized -as follows (pertinent sections are noted in parentheses): 1. Transitional District (17.60) The Transitional District is designed to provide for 1 aeA 1 L. --- ._LL., i il"L%. %A �. VllU llC r 1. L Q 1 �"Q=Q LI1 0LeaJ WLICle the neighbo - hood is in transition from residential to commercial and a low intensity commercialmix is appropriate. The District allows for a low intensity residential/ commercial mix and provides protection to abutting properties through specific attention to buffers, noise, hours of operation and type of use. It is designed to allow for a variety of compatible uses in existing buildings and to allow the consolidation of small lots and the use of combined access drives for new construction when the proposed use does not significantly change the character of the abutting area. The Transitional District shall be treated as a residential district for the purpose of conformance with the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. (17.601) Permitted uses - a single, two and multi -family dwellings and customary accessory uses, including agricultural crops. (17.602) Conditional uses a. business and professional offices b. churches and day care centers C. State and municipal facilities d. nursing and convalescent homes (17.6031) Conditional Use Standards - The above uses may only be permitted by approval of the Zoning Board of Adjustment if the following general and specific standrads are met: a. capacity of existing and planned facilities b. character of the area affected C. traffic on roads and highways d. bylaws then in effect e. utilization of renewable energy resources (17.6032) Specific Standards: a. adequate distance and building separation from adjacent or nearby uses. Higher set -backs may be set to protect adjoining uses. - 2- b. no adverse impact on residents, or neighboring uses due to noise, lighting and hours of operation. c. proposed building shall be compatible to the use, scale, and architecture of existing residential buildings that have a visual or functional relation- ship to the proposed building. (17.604) The Area, Density and Dimensional requirements for permitted uses are those of the abutting residential district; For conditional uses: minimum lot size is 10,000 square feet; lot coverage is 25% for buildings; 60% for building, parking and outside storage. Set -backs are 40 feet front yard, 30 feet rear yard, 15 feet side yard,; 120 feet frontage on local. streets, 170 feet on arterials and collectors. 2. Proposed Location: The District shall apply to the west side of Dorset Street between the land of University Mall Realty Trust just south of 225 Dorset Street to Sherry Road, a distance of 1450 feet at a depth of 120 feet. (MAP) THE ABOVE IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE 1982 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING REGULATIONS AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED. COPIES OF THE COMPLETED TEXT MAY BE EXAMINED AT THE OFFICES OF THE CITY CLERK, 575 DORSET STREET, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT. SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL July 20, 1985 /p g6! Op dr+A°01 °"S+°r �r+rnBn _e .4@��01 r�p eyy O° pnbr oO6 b /ooV eb°b ng ,r 6�`�MjO/p`bo'rlCZC ,o rloo 6otOfl`�.o 0 10 r/n@a 4, `yo poo / 10 rro 4joV o ` 40 & 6p / .;ae as Op rjl no°b �W °aJ@oyr / �° 4 S n8r o +r°n° orB.� o`ob °d 6, .nOS 10 o, o Yo emu r°i°knee'+o (I�M�OIb °b no 401 O+o +r y you 4, 6wn o e 41,o1r°i�/n a� rt g�4 o ro+ppa� / JS °+oS* 0 °;d , o os. r /or S! `yo1 B� o� 4o,IJ% 04oo , 4i r. 1o/ood `40j°�+ n n °S b J ..�Vlopo /ode s o B` y ° 'u/'°°ob fl* �o o � °r .4r 6• `o ^;o`rn+o or °`,`+ `OVo 6 wno ono Z z) °'� y." //n 0 1o°s ovd' + ouo wo`O4o`Or °n6 /'ljd�/o °90b Sir o '1141 Pam'`+°d`O o� `oav'oj�Nno 6 o r -yo Ynr � d' -off :op :•qo- ,ov .o ayLo o 04009 4,r`Oy+ `o, ° r'OVp/ Q,/0t, ,oao/n6o+4.°nbr V p or�yO ';'ty /o nos dopl0000v O �on Gi , OM°'1t +r6 ' "O l ng' cy o'A ° + 1 wao +O % '17 °oo °40o nosy .r000'M j SgQ cw °/' °4p 4i, ° o o-wj4 1°/ °�°b9 ol S �Jww-, ° a, , S + 8"AV, °oop ling w August 26, 1985 Mr. Ernest Ross P.O. Box 9378 South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: zoning appeal Dear Mr. Ross: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, September 9, 1985 at 5:00 p.m, to consider your request. Please plan to attend this meeting. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcg 1 - t7 O2 .0 O, 20 o 3 �rhp • ��•o`P,�� wo `�byco ° PaC °�F�F NcJ+. Dea 0`�0 'F o-°A'`'cA J�0 o Qm oc a`ch Ja. as y e P roc Ja o o a 0+ , F� oa OC L° oA' �o C�O l " m C q� A c.•ca o oa�Qi.. c °`ti P�F �� OyyroC AFC °t c�aO`� oFOo �`pj �rOcYc op 0 PQw° `' 0 0'c o ° .ro cO�fi °y \a'`a �p y1.OQQ`caFob icooP�J`cA oca + O �.N o� crpc o�ro \ o cA '; f' pcy�o°+,QiQo yA o4 ,p0 J . OCya ° ° O° O o h0 `^J' ,'+°CO c � ao O y�,jCO: CS; 15 yaoQh,�yct�'ooccaA�.+ S�oayyy oy coa"ac i`b y�c c�'J\OO�c'o5�c°,°0c0 y .ro OcsF44' e h e yyo° `gb?`& ra� oAa`pod�0;eoaoo`CoQa � c. . Di Oo'OO.O� C.yy0' 0 aO a°d O �` CC ``` 0 OpQ ym pr ocmc ° Naa�oc. OIAFA +°c ;oocoQ: rPQ PQ ,i�Eo.o tod°m C!°o'YA Lo°Oac°+ocCp #'D'po �Tr J y�>a0°�'D ao o0pc �o Fey C Y 0' �Zc00J,f; O'�, Oo` oo°459a1oc`°c P yo koca Q m.�La. F°i `' co 0 Fah P>° o`chh Qi.o` °a v °+ oao �o`coo°. c '0 m #pO° O!aC y0, eaO y0 eQQa ° o({ oao eP°C Fy a°Am axO ryc°Q°oo 6 ° o `°o °c°h,doo xb0 racOa 0.�kh� cao t° 0 i' .. ; o ° + iQoPa maOcorJl °cy s�a&ti�ao-1:4Pa + rp°�c D33. %o� o`AaDo . cJVa o S,°po Oc„. co,�oO� r 3;`Op �,�o.°P�aQio�Op .Q0t 4Q°o0A�PA�cA.FecoC�orO�vro CO ObQ°QA'�oc 3` Q�om0a+ N'D0 A" °O4F'HFao $ O°sOOoP.aoO ++c° °o o` mmo�\Q.xc �SF°��'' A� ey \�aoa�°°°aoAioo. # y�5iy z`tQ�\o FCc ^'Pt�Q+Q mCIO 5J°1�ti ° 40°oco°cc4°c� 000oaQQpoc J?OCOOcNi OyQ'Q° c0A0\a °eV` A� y° o'° ° Za °'°"0'jj °'0 CI°°�-JQ'FcaJoyc°°'� cj , °a Q h*" o 0 c c m`• P o`c D o #A mc`o°oc- pJ p�Ory,° Dy�o C9`m OcD. ,aa Fyo m�' Oy 0` + co Ao `oc y i ao o��'oCl �' aye`° + o • y o• o a° S 3c0 .J y Jy° Q s°�S yr Caic .CmO O S °J Fm OJxl°e O yC .p \,�0. py c .� o' . ° cA �O `' �,� o° 5 �iOaa aca py,� om y mQ- �r p `io O QQO y° a �o icy, °Cv \CA' yr i0 O� po Pm p c oa iD #q' AJar°car mS jor o 4Z�i Or�`i cy a °c°aF D° �Q P \ aF y Q,Q. cA DJ o o � am y.o c J/ A � PJ NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Name, address and telephone # of applicant Name, addre.as of property owner Property location and description \J�2 .. , va l i / _ r J I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Hearing Date Signature of Appellant Do not write below this line --------- ---------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on at (day of we month and date time to consider the following: Appeal of�-- seeking a from Section .' !1 , �,r-.�-r,,--�,•�'� 't �a t� of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to '�� ,,�.G..t%-Gr^C/�'�-rC !.:.-i,n.. �> ; - .-: '( /l�.• '`�%"L"C✓r �'Yi�G,�.,s' 9'..'.Gr.�.�-`7'` ^'!."'G,.C....r � 0 ,x NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Name, address and telephone # of applicant Name, address of property owner Property location and description I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The iegai advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Hearing Date Signature of Appellant Do not write below this line ---------------------------=----------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on at (day of week) (month and date) time to consider the following: ` Appeal of ..1� r seeking S d.a. = a .+_, from Section a od-'l-C/7, �Q� '°.c�"` ,,'...''u� of the South v Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to L+b�' August 12, 1985 Ms. Laura Brooks 329 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Ms. Brooks: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, August 26, 1985 at 5:00 P.M. to consider your application of appeal. Please plan to attend this meeting. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcq 3) GREG CHIOFFI - 329 DORSET STREET Area zoned CD 3. Section 14.202 Conditional uses, sub section d medical offices to include a change in square footage. Section 14.402(c) building envelops between 0 and 80 feet (see exhibit 14b), setback 10 feet west of right-of-way and side yard 5 feet. Existing structure is non complying structure developed outside of building envelop. Section 25.108 setback from residential district 65 feet with a 15 Loot LLL.7 LCr l.11pC , li-L01ULllg au 11pr vpv3 IJcu .J ivva, buffer, .c..oab----k proposed 50 feet. Proposed additon 15'x 36' 6", existing structure 24'x 36' City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 9, 1997 Mr. Greg Chioffi Chioffi Insurance 329 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Zoning Appeal Dear Mr. Chioffi: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, June 23, 1997 at 7:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance and or a conditional use approval. Please plan to attend this meeting and be prepared to address the enclosed review criteria. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcp 1 Encl UTH $OZONING NOTICE N In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the I South Burlington Zoning t Board of Adjustment will I hold a public hearing at I the South Burlington 1 Municipal Offices, Con- ference Room, 575 Dor- set Street, South Burling- S ton, Vermont on Monday, June 23, 1997 at 7:00 P.M. to consider the following: #1 Appeal of Harvey Butterfield and Deborah Galbraith seeking a vari- ance from Section 26.003 Extension to non conforming uses (Sec- tion 3.10 Boundaries of Conservation/Open Space District) of the south a_rnnrnn Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to con- struct a 7'x14' patio (2 story) and a 16'x28' sec- ond story addition to an existing residential dwell- ing to within approxi- mately forty-four (44) feet of Lake Champlain, lo- cated at 68 Bartlett Bay Road. #2 Appeal of William Orleans seeking ap- proval from Section 11.50 Non complying structures (increase to square footage, Condi- tional uses) and a vari- ance from Section 25.00 Dimensional require- ments of the South Bur- lington Zoning Regula- tions. Request is for permission to increase the footprint of an exist- ing garage by two (2) feet to within two (2) feet of the southely side yard and construct a second story over the garage at a maximum height of twenty (20) feet on a lot containing 1680 square feet located at 84 Central Avenue. #3 Appeal of Greg Chioffi seeking approval from Section 14.202 Conditional uses sub section (d) Medical of- fices (change in square footage) and a variance Ifrom Section 26.00 Non complying structure of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Re-', quest is for permission to construct a 15'x36'6" addition to an existing 24'x36' structure (non complying to setback re- quirements) on a lot con- taining 7700 square feet, located at 329 Dorset Street. Plans are on file with the South Burlington Plan- ning and Zoning Office. i 'ocated at City Hall, 5751 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont. Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer June 7, 1997 ItAo 'i / 4, 2, 0 City of South Burlington Application to Boi of Adjustment Official Use APPLICATION # HEARING DATE Date 13 - 0?S - 9 % Applicant -e_, , Qi►ner, leased, agent FILING DATE FEE AMOUNT Address l"1r7e_ rCehrl c t.1 F' -')c fjurf Telephone # Y&q- /'?Vo Landowner Address �a `l ! U _Se 74 s Location and description of property 43 !�3 I-' Type of application check one: ( ) appeal from decision of Administrative Officer ( ) request for a conditional use ( ) request for a variance. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Provisions of zoning ordinance in question Reason for appeal �? The following documents are submitted in support of the application: 3,TE PZ/3 A/ -- /:5 rc.i c:9 f Aldr,ch Hearing Date Signa re of Appellant Do not write below this line --------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24, V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Day of Week at to consider the following: Month and Date Appeal of Time V seeking -ft from Section �7G✓ 1't'0'J'' V�GG� #,$ Z z of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to �Y.� ql' � r V.S.H. REALTY, INC. Richard Crawford 329,333 & 337 Dorset Street Area zoned R-4 District Section 9.10 Permitted uses - prohibits the proposed use Section 18.00 Dimensional requirements, sub -section 18.101 Miniumun setback 50 feet from planned right-of-way Dorset Street planned right-of-way 80 feet,minimum•set back 56 feet Proposed 24'x32' canopy with two pump islands to within fifteen (15) feet Section 19.104 landscaping requirement - sub section B "not more than.30% of the front yard shall be used for driveways and parking" Lot 210'xl25' = 26,250 square feet 30% of front yard equals 3,465 square feet Actual area occupied 9,424 square feet or 81% - landscaped area 2,126 square feet Traffic Overlay District proposed use 15-16 hour convenience store - using low side average - maximum size use permitted for zone 5 - 2016 square feet proposed 2400 square feet December 28, 1984 Mr. Richard Crawford V.S.H. Realty, Inc. 777 Dedham Street Canton, Massachusetts 02021 Re: Zoning appeal Dear Mr. Crawford: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment has denied your request for a zoning variance. Generally the Board finds that the property could be used in conformity with the zoning regulations and that the proposed use would change the character of the neighborhood. Formal findings will be issued by the Board at a later date. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcg No Text L/1517 - m of No Text x2 'It 1--*d" 41le, No Text NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Name, address and telephone # of applicant Name, address of property owner Property location and description I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Hearing Date Signature of Appellant _-___--__Do_not write below this line --------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on , at day of week month and date time to consider the following: -` Appeal of seeking 4 f t from Section r , / G�1 of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to �..- f 1 t el p f - � �.�/ f � � Pax ,rya C.� .,�"�.� .,y �a-� ,.-L wu� ^.•- t »� ,��'� _ �, M E M O R A N D U M TO: South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment FROM: William J.• Szymanski, City Manager w�5 RE: Appeal #2, December 17, 1984 Hearing Variance Request V.S.H. Realty Inc. 329, 333 & 337 Dorset Street DATE: December 6, 1984 The City Council at their meeting on December 3, 1984, reviewed the Z.B.A. Agenda for the appeals scheduled for December 17, 1984 and requested that I convey to the Board the Council's concern for the granting of a variance for the above referenced properties. Granting of the variance would have a serious traffic impact on Dorset Street, especially if the use is in place prior to the widening of Dorset Street. The City Planning Commission will begin updating the City Master Plan at the start of the new year and of course, this area will be reviewed. To Whom it May Concern: I am a property owner adjacent to the proposed site of Cumberland Farms on Dorset Street. Be advised that I have reviewed the Cumberland Farms plans and have no objections to their use and location. Sincerely, 14 To Whom it May Concern: I am a property owner adjacent to the proposed site of Cumberland Farms on Dorset Street. Be advised that I have reviewed the Cumberland Farms plans and have no objections to their use and location. Sincerely, S- el; 14� December 3, 1984 Mr. Richard Crawford V.S.H. Realty, Inc. 777 Dedham Street Canton, Massachusetts 02021 Re: Zoning appeal Dear Mr. Crawford: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street on Monday, December 17, 1984 at 5:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend this meeting. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcg OUTH 6URUNOTON ZONING NOTICE 1{ '" 1 in accordance.,with Nte South Burlington. Zon�nq - Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 44 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a Pn ublic hearing at the Sou Bur- gton Municipal Offices, Con- ference Room,575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, December 17, 1984 at 5:00 p.m.to cOnsider the "A' 1 lowing i 1. Appeal Of' Gary Barren, agentsaskinrgg o variance from � Section-19.00, Non -conforming uses, sub -section 19.004 of the South Burlington Regulations. Re- quest is for permission to occupy three existing structures, con- taining 5.580 square feet as lot nee service business, on at lot containing opP ly 27,855 square feet, at 374 Pot' chen Rood formerly Redi Bilt Construction. 2. Appeal of V.S.H. Realty, Inc. Richard Crawford, agent seeking o variance from Section 9.10, Permitted uses and "Section 18.00 Dimensional requirements of the South Burlington Regulo- irons. Request is for permission to construct a convenient store can - toining 2400 square feet. In con- junction with the use request to construct a 24' x 32' canopy with two pump islands to within fifteen (151 feet. of the roQorea front yard and to occupy greater than 30% of the front yard for parking and circulation, at 329, 333 and 337 Dorset Street. Richard `Nord Zoning Administrative Officer December 1, 1984 iRp /, c o r r 613,M]_ 1. n NOTICE OF APPEAL C2AN a ✓�c-act � '7 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Name, address and telephone # of applicant V. 5, 4 Zti3c. Name, address of property ownerH,y� Property location and description _T�\v-`-e Ar-tC Ln�e ht) e�� ti��C'xa� I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing2au"' p lee Hearing Date Signature of Appe lent Do not write below this line ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing ! at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on , , at day of week month and date time to consider the following: Appeal of seeking a U�(,�, , from Section r.,r4'..-ta of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to 411 Q,c �.ct� v cL'r-•c-�.-* cam. q�:c..r, .. 009 .apt.-e.