HomeMy WebLinkAboutDR-04-06 - Decision - 0321 Dorset StreetCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
STEVE DESARNO — 321 DORSET STREET
DESIGN REVIEW #DR-04-06
FINDINGS OF FACT & DECISION
Steve DeSamo, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting design review approval to
replace an existing 11' x 16' screen porch with an 11' x 16' deck constructed of wood, replacing the
existing front steps with new steps constructed of wood, and painting the trim on the existing house
white. The subject property falls within Design District 3 of the City Center Design Review Overlay
District. Pursuant to Section 11.01(D)(1)(b) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations,
the addition or alteration of an exterior wall of a building or structure shall be subject to design
review by the Design Review Committee (DRC) and the Development Review Board (DRB). The
South Burlington Design Review Committee reviewed the proposal on May 4, 2004. The South
Burlington Development Review Board reviewed the proposal on August 3, 2004. Steve DeSarno
was present.
Based on testimony given at the above mentioned meetings and on the plans and supporting
materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds
and decides as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
The applicant is requesting design review approval to replace an existing 11' x 16'
screen porch with an 11' x 16' deck constructed of wood, replacing the existing front
steps with new steps constructed of wood, and painting the trim on the existing house
white.
2. Steve Desarno is the record owner of the property.
3. The subject property falls within Design District 3 of the City Center Design
Review (CCDR) Overlay District.
4. The Design Review application was reviewed under Section 11.01 of the South
Burlington Land Development Regulations.
Design plans for properties within Design District 1 shall comply with the following design criteria, as
outlined in Section 11.01(F) of the Land Development Regulations:
(a) Consistent design. Building design shall promote a consistent organization of major
elements; and decorative parts must relate to the character of the design. All sides of a building
shall be designed so that they are compatible in terms of material, window treatments, architectural
accents, cornicelparapet design, etc. The design of a building should consider the design features
of other structures in the area so as not to be harshly discordant with other nearby buildings.
The proposed additions are in compliance with this criterion.
g
S.:
.. .�4�4.f`. t'� n .. :f�` .."Fry ..�c.
9_
y�'
r. :.
>;
... . � .�. .d,
.� .. : ,
�.e � ,., .
4
1
J
a
(b) Materials used. High quality, attractive materials shall be used on all buildings. Natural,
indigenous materials of stone, masonry, and wood shall predominate. Other materials may be used
as an architectural accent provided they are harmonious with the building and site.
The proposed deck and steps will be constructed of wood.
(c) Colors and textures used. The color and texture of the building shall be harmonious with
the building itself and with other buildings on the site and nearby. Colors naturally occurring from
building materials and other traditional, subdued colors are encouraged. More than three (3)
predominant colors are discouraged.
The proposed project is in compliance with this criterion. The applicant is proposing to paint the
trim on the building white.
1. The trim on the building shall be painted white.
(d) Windows and doors. Window and door treatment shall be a careful response to the
buildings interior organization as well as the features of the building site. The treatment of windows
and doors shall be in a manner that creates a rhythm that gives necessary order and unity to the
facade, yet avoids monotony. For sides of buildings that face or front public streets, the majority of
the first floor's fagade area shall consist of see -through glass in order to promote pedestrian activity,
however, the windows and doors should be of human scale, so as to welcome pedestrians.
This criterion is not applicable to the subject application.
(e) Roofs as a design element. Roofs shall be part of, or define, the style of a building. They
shall be used creatively to break up long facades and potentially long roof lines.
For one-story structures, the minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be
8 on 12 and 12 on 12, respectively. For structures of two (2) or more stories, the
minimum and maximum slope of a pitched roof shall be 5 on 12 and 12 on 12,
respectively. Only a small portion of roof area may be flat provided it is not visible
from the public street, existing or planned, or does not detract from the overall design
and harmony of the building. Where portions of a roof are flat, architectural elements
such as cornices and parapets shall be included to improve the appearance and
provide interest. Large, low -slope (i.e., less than 5 on 12) gable forms are
discouraged.
This criterion is not applicable to the subject application.
(t) Orient buildings to the public street. Buildings shall be designed in a manner that relates
the building to the public street in order to protect the integrity of city blocks, present an inviting
street front and promote traditional street patterns_ New buildings shall be built to the street property
line. For existing buildings undergoing renovation, improvements shall be done to relate the building
better to the public street. Such improvements could include installation of doors and windows
facing the public street.
This criterion is not applicable to the subject application.
(g) Conceal rooftop devices. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances to be used in
the operation or maintenance of a structure shall be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any
point at or below the roof level of the subject structure.
2
Aj
Oyu snins", va wt,
00 ✓MnQ Q.i.
11 vim
11;nw,
2ovy v
'Vow; jn M" lot
W410 hT r A
"VT v 4 AA MvOM v! YC701 A1
.
lot KIM 01 may A.
This criterion is not applicable to the subject application
(h) Promote energy efficiency. Where feasible, the design of a building should consider solar
energy and the use of natural daylight by capturing the sun's energy during the winter and providing
shade during the summer.
This criterion is not applicable to the subject application.
(i) Pedestrian promenade along Market Street. In Design District 1, the provision of a
covered pedestrian promenade along Market Street is required in order to protect pedestrians from
inclement weather and promote walking. Any pedestrian canopy, or portion thereof, that is
proposed to be located within or encroach into the public R.O. W. shall meet the specifications
identified in the City Center Streetscape Guidelines. An applicant may elect to incorporate a
covered pedestrian promenade as a component of the building and completely on the applicant's
property, provided the promenade is at least 10 feet high and 8 feet deep. The Development
Review Board may waive the requirement for a covered pedestrian promenade or canopy on a
building or portion thereof if the Development Review Board finds that the block on which the
building is located is adequately covered by other existing promenades/canopies.
This criterion is not applicable to the subject application.
In addition, design plans for properties within Design District 1 shall comply with the following site
design criteria, as outlined in Section 11.02 of the Land Development Regulations:
(a) Landscape and plantings. Significant trees and vegetation should be preserved in its
natural state insofar as practicable. Any grade changes should be in keeping with the general
appearance of neighboring developed areas. Landscape plantings and amenities shall be well
designed with appropriate variations and shall be included as an integral enhancement of the site
and, where needed, for screening purposes_ In particular, parking areas shall be well screened by
berms, plantings, or other screening methods to minimize their visual impact. Planting islands shall
be used to break up larger expanses of paved parking areas.
This criterion is not applicable to the subject application.
(b) Integrate special features with the design. Storage areas, machinery and equipment
installation, service areas, truck loading areas, garbage and refuse collection areas, utility
connections, meters and structures, mailboxes, and similar accessory structures shall be positioned
in such a way to minimize visibility from the public street, existing or planned. Such features shall be
incorporated within or designed as part of the building on the site, not added as an afterthought.
HVAC equipment should not be pad
mounted at grade. Utility connections shall be installed underground and utilities shall co -exist to
the greatest extent possible.
This criterion is not applicable to the subject application.
(c) Walls, fences or other screening features: Such elements, if used, shall be employed in a
skillful manner and in harmony with the architectural context of the development. Such features
should be used to enhance building appearance and to strengthen visual linkages between a
building and its surroundings.
,
t � { .�' .� - .• . .. my s e , t,,.
P
This criterion is not applicable to the subject application
(d) Accessible open space. When providing open space on a site, it shall
be designed to be visually and physically accessible from the public street. Open space should add
to the visual amenities of the vicinity by maximizing its visibility for persons passing by or
overlooking the site from neighboring properties. If open space is intended for active use, it should
include such elements as benches, shade trees, and refuse containers and be so designed to
maximize its accessibility for all individuals, including the disabled, and encourage social
interaction. The siting of open space on a lot shall also consider the potential impact of buildings,
both existing and potential, on shadow casting and solar access.
This criterion is not applicable to the subject application.
(e) Provide efficient and effective circulation. With respect to vehicular and pedestrian
circulation, special attention shall be given to the location and number of access points to public
streets and sidewalks, to the separation of vehicles and pedestrians, to the arrangement of parking
areas and to service and loading areas, and to the location of accessible routes and ramps for the
disabled. Site design shall also provide for interconnections, both vehicular and pedestrian,
between adjacent properties.
This criterion is not applicable to the subject application
(0 Outdoor Lighting. Outdoor lighting shall be designed to be both aesthetically pleasing and
functional. The lighting type shall be metal halide, compact fluorescent, and/or induction lamps, and
shall be of a white color (e.g., CRI 70 or greater). Light fixtures shall be appropriately shielded to
preclude glare and overall illumination levels should be evenly distributed.
This criterion is not applicable to the subject application.
(g) Provide for nature's events. Attention shall be accorded to design features which address the
affects of rain, snow and ice at building entrances and on sidewalks, and to provisions for snow and
ice removal from circulation areas.
This criterion is not applicable to the subject application.
(h) Make spaces secure and safe. With respect to personal safety, all open and enclosed spaces
should be designed to facilitate building evacuation, and provide reasonable accessibility by fire,
police or other emergency personnel and equipment.
This criterion is not applicable to the subject application
(i) Streetscape improvements. An applicant for new development shall be responsible for
implementing streetscape improvements (e.g., sidewalks, street lighting, street trees, etc.) within
the portion of the public street ROW directly fronting the parcel of land for which development is
proposed. Such streetscape improvements shall be in accord with the specifications contained in
the City Center Streetscape Design Guidelines.
This criterion is not applicable to the subject application.
4
p
E` r, it Uk c °., C
r E , . �, is
DECISION
Motion by Gayle Quimby, seconded by Chuck Bolton, to approve design review application #DR-
04-06, conditional upon the following conditions:
1. All previous approvals and stipulations shall remain in full effect, except as amended herein.
2. This project shall be completed as shown on the plans submitted by the applicant, as
amended by this decision, and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning.
3. Any finishes resulting from this project shall be harmonious in color and texture to the
building itself and to the surrounding buildings on the property.
4. Pursuant to section 17.04(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the
applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months of this decision.
5. Any changes to the site plan shall require approval of the South Burlington Design Review
Committee and the South Burlington Development Review Board.
Chuck Bolton —�/nay/abstain/not present
Mark Boucher —yea/nay/abstain/not present
John Dinklage —yea/nay/abstain/not present
Roger Farley —yea/nay/abstain/not present
Michele Kupersmith —yga/nay/abstain/not present
Larry Kupferman — r� ea/nay/abstain/not present
Gayle Quimby — r�/nay/abstain/present
MOTION CARRIED by a vote of 5-0-0.
Signed this day of August, 2004 by
Gay uimby, Clerk
Please note: You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental Court,
pursuant to 24 VSA 4471 and VRCP 76 in writing, within 30 days of the date this decision is
issued. The fee is $225.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to challenge this
decision at some future time may be lost because you waited too long. You will be bound by
the decision, pursuant to 24 VSA 4472 (d) (exclusivity of remedy; finality).
.a: ,� � ,�., :-,
� :.. � � ..
J , .
„, ,.
,. ,� �;..
�` r ,
i'.
�yi',. - .. ' .
A.,. ,:. �� .m .. �.o I. .s r .......
.i� - Via,. .. 7 � e �,' .�K,t r �};..
� 1 �