Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDR-03-05 - Decision - 0205 Dorset StreetCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PETER JACOB — 205 DORSET STREET DESIGN REVIEW #DR-03-05 FINDINGS OF FACT & DECISION Peter Jacob, hereafter referred to as the applicant, request for approval to replace an existing Master Signage Permit with a new Master Signage Permit, so that future tenants are able to receive sign permits. Specifically, the applicant is seeking approval for the use of three (3) colors that will cover the current tenants of the building. The South Burlington Design Review Committee reviewed the proposal on September 29, 2003. The South Burlington Development Review Board reviewed the proposal on October 7, 2003. Based on testimony given at the above mentioned meetings and on the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds and decides as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant is requesting for approval to replace an existing Master Signage Permit with a new Master Signage Permit, so that future tenants are able to receive sign permits. Specifically, the applicant is seeking approval for the use of three (3) colors that will cover the current tenants of the building. 2. Peter and Vilma Jacob are the record owners of the property. The property is identified as Tax Parcel 0570 00205-C. 3. The Master Signage Permit application was reviewed under Section 6 of the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA In reviewing an application for signage, the Design Review Committee and the Development Review Board shall consider the following: Consistent Design The design of a sign must be compatible and harmonious with the design of buildings on the subject property and nearby. The application shows one freestanding sign for the four tenants on the property: Allstate, Banknorth, Vina Hair Magic, and Touchstone Healing. The replacement of the existing A+ Beeper sign panels will bring the sign into conformance with the existing Master Sign Permit, which requires a dark background with light colored letters. The signposts are pressure -treated wood with gray color and texture to match the exterior of the building. The application shows four (4) wall signs, which will be in compliance with the existing Master Signage Permit once the A+ Beepers sign is replaced with a sign that has a dark background with light letters. Promotion of City Center Goals Signs within the DS/CC Sign District should be of high aesthetic quality and pedestrian oriented. The Design Review Committee and the Development Review Board believe theses signs, once the A+ Beeper sign is replaced, will be of high aesthetic quality. There are no signs proposed on the east wall of the building, along the sidewalk where pedestrian traffic will be present. Therefore, the Design Review Committee and the Development Review Board feel the sign is in keeping with DS/CC Sign District goals. Color & Texture The Design Review Committee and Development Review Board feel the color and texture of the signs are compatible with nearby buildings along Dorset Street. The wall signs on the Banknorth building are compatible with buildings at the University Mall. A maximum of three colors is encouraged. The proposed sign plan includes blue, purple, and red backgrounds, with light colored letters. The Design Review Committee and Development Review Board feel this layout is sufficient to satisfy this requirement. Materials Used The applicant's sign -contractor indicated that both the wall signs and freestanding signs will be internally illuminated electric -cabinet signs with aluminum frames and plastic faces. All of the signs have vinyl or painted graphics. The signposts are pressure -treated wood with gray color and texture to match the exterior of the building. Wall Mounted Signs Section 10 of the Sign Ordinance governs the size and location of wall -mounted signs. Pursuant to Section 10(b)(1) a wall -mounted sign shall not exceed 5% of the area of the principal public facade or 100 sq. ft., whichever is smaller. The total principal public facade of the two buildings is 1,000 square feet, of which 50 square feet can be devoted to wall signs. The area of the existing wall signs is 46 square feet, which is in compliance with this requirement. Section 10(b)(2) states that a wall -mounted sign cannot exceed 15% of the area of the fagade to which it is attached. The signs on this property are in conformance with this requirement. Section 10(c) states that a wall -mounted sign shall not project above the roof or parapet of the building nor below the top of any first floor doorway unless permitted through the design review approval process. Based on the photographs submitted by the applicant, the small 1'x3' rectangular sign on the north wall of the Banknorth building falls below the top of the first floor doorway. However, it is an existing sign that is near the top of the first floor doorway, so the Design Review Committee and Development Review Board feel this location is adequate. The other three (3) existing wall signs are in compliance with this requirement. Pursuant to Section 10(d), a wall -mounted sign shall not cover any opening or project beyond the top or end of any wall to which it is attached. Based on the photographs submitted by the applicant, it appears that the signs will not project over any opening or beyond the top or end of the front facade. Section 10(g) stipulates that a wall -mounted sign shall not project from the wall in excess of 9". The application does not indicate the extent to which the sign will project from the fagade. However, based on the submitted photographs and Staff site visits, this does not appear to be an issue. DECISION Motion by �- ,��5 seconded by C to approve design review application- DR-03-05, conditional upon the following conditions: 1. A Master Signage Permit shall be issued to Peter and Vilma Jacob by the Development Review Board, prior to the issuance of any individual sign permit for the properly. 2. The colors of the signs shall include blue, reed, and purple backgrounds with light colored letters. 3. Pursuant to Section 20 of the Sign Ordinance, all signs shall be of substantial and sturdy construction, kept in good repair, and painted or cleaned as necessary to maintain a clean, safe, and orderly appearance. Chuck Bolton ea nay/abstain/not resent Mark Boucher —yea/nay/abstain/ t res John Dinklage/nay/abstain/not present Roger Farley ea nay/abstain/not present Michele Kupersmithjna a nay/abstain/not present Larry Kupferman y/abstain/not present Gayle Quimby e-/nay/abstain/present MOTION CARRIED by a vote of (2> - O - v Signed this day of October, 2003, by 7 John Dinklage, Chair No Text