Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSD-05-39 - Decision - 0155 Dorset StreetCITY of SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT of PLANNING AND ZONING UNIVERSITY MALL REALTY TRUST - 155 DORSET STREET FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-05-39 FINDINGS of FACT AND DECISION University Mall Realty Trust, hereinafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 675,115 sq. ft. GFA shopping center complex with 614,388 sq. ft. of GLA. The amendment consists of reconstructing three (3) existing entryways, 155 Dorset Street. The Development Review Board held a public hearing on June 7, 2005. Sheila McIntyre represented the applicant. Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS of FACT 1. The applicant is seeking to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 675,115 sq. ft. GFA shopping center complex with 614,388 sq. ft. of GLA. The amendment consists of reconstructing three (3) existing entryways, 155 Dorset Street. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is University Mall Realty Trust. 3. The subject property is located in the Commercial 1 (Cl) Zoning District. 4. The plans submitted consist of a six (6) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled, "Overall Plan University Mall Entry Modifications 155 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont",prepared by Summit Engineering, Inc., dated 4/13/05. - 1 - ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Table 1. Dimensional Requirements F C1 Zoning District [Required _Proposed Min. Lot Size Max. Building Coverage F 4,000 S.F. 40% 51.76 acres—tl _ 29.9% 1jl Max. Overall Coverage 70% 68.9% tiI Front Setback 30 ft. > 30 ft. y Side Setback_ 10 ft. ft. _ _ Rear Setback _ _ 30 ft. _>10 >30 tt. Front Yard Coverage 30% 37.6% Max. Building Height <35 ft. 22 ft. zoning compliance PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations PUDs shall comply with the following standards and conditions: (a) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (b) Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (c) The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (d) The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (e) The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Pian and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. WM The proposed entrances appear to be compatible with existing development in the University Mall planned unit development. The applicant has submitted visual simulations of the proposed entrances. (f) ®pen space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (g) The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (h) Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (i) Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (j) The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). The proposed entrances are consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations an r PUD_shall require site_ Ilan approval. Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The proposed entrances meet the above -mentioned criterion. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. -3- This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The proposed entrances will have a maximum height of 22'. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant has submitted a visual simulation of the proposed entrances. The above - mentioned criteria have been met. (t) proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. Again, the applicant has submitted a visual simulation of the proposed entrances. The above -mentioned criteria have been met.. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Requiations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire.•served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and M properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). This criterion is not applicable to the proposed project. (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements. Pursuant to Section 13.06 of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed project will require a minimum of $8,500 of additional landscaping. The applicant is proposing $10,920 of additional landscaping, which meets this requirement. The applicant submitted an adequate landscaping plan (sheet P1) and budget, both of which were prepared by a landscape professional. (e) Other Signage cannot be approved by the Development Review Board; it must be approved by the Administrative Officer, in accordance with the South Burlington Sign Ordinance. DECISION Motion by � N U1 �4 ��� seconded by 40612A � �-� to approve Final Plat Application SD-05-39 of University Mall Realty Trus , subject to the following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations shall remain in full effect, except as amended herein. 2. This project shall be completed as shown on the plan submitted by the applicant, and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. 3. The plat plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Administrative Officer. Four (4) copies of the approved revised plat plan shall be submitted to the Administrative Officer prior to recording, a. The final plat plan shall be revised to show the access connection to the property to the north. b. The final plat plan shall be revised to show the Delorme house as being removed. 4. The applicant shall obtain sign permits, from the Administrative Officer, for any alterations to the existing signs. 5. The applicant shall post an $8500 landscape bond, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. This bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of surviving. -5- 6. Any changes to the final plat plan shall require approval of the South Burlington Development Review Board. 7. The final plat plan (sheet S1) shall be recorded in the land records within 00 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Mark Behr — e ay/abstain/not present Chuck Bolton — e nay/abstain/not present John Dinklage — e nay/abstain/not present Roger Farley — e nay/abstain/not present Larry Kupferman — e /nay/abstain/not present Gayle Quimby — e nay/abstain/not present Motion carried by a vote of & - b - 0 Signed this day of June 2005, by John Dinklage,"iffhair 1041 Please note: You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental Court, pursuant to 24 VSA 4471 and VRCP 76 in writing, within 30 days of the date this decision is issued. The fee is $225.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to challenge this decision at some future time may be lost because you waited too long. You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 VSA 4472 (d) (exclusivity of remedy; finality).