Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - TDR IZ Committee - 02/11/2019SOUTH BURLINGTON TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 11, 2019 The Transfer of Development Rights Commiee held a regular meeng on Monday, February 11, 2019, at City Hall, 575 Dorset Street, beginning at 7:14 pm. Members Present: Tim Barri, Chair, Andrew Chalnick, Tom Bailey, Clerk, and Michael Miag Members Absent: Michael Albertson, Jacob West Staff and Guests: Monica Ostby, Kevin Dorn, City Manager (for the first five minutes of the meeng) and Kelly Lord. (1) Directions on emergency evacuation procedures from conference room; Directions were provided (2) Agenda: Additions, deletions or changes in order of agenda items; Tim menoned that Paul Conner had posted an agenda on the City website. It was found to be general in nature and suggested the Commiee connue the discussion of the use of TDRs. Aer a discussion, Tom moved, and Andrew seconded, to appoint Mike as Chair of the Commiee. The moon was unanimously approved. Tom moved and Andrew seconded approval of the Minutes of the January 30th meeting. The motion to approve the Minutes was unanimously approved. (3) Open to the public for items not related to the agenda; No comments (4) Continued discussion of use and applicability of Transferable Development Rights; Then Mike asked: What the goals are of the Commiee’s work and what are the next steps? Tim responded that the Commiee’s role was to understand how TDRs funcon, to make a report to the City Council and the Planning Commission and to make recommendaons. Mike cricized the language of the current TDR regulaon. Monica reiterated a recommendaon from the Commiee’s last meeng that a “clearing house” should be created for owners (sellers) and potenal buyers of TDRs to facilitate the TDR exchange market. She also suggested that (consistent with a recommendaon by Paul Conner at the end of the Commiee’s last meeng) the Commiee develop three different potenal recommendaons and explore each:a. Improve the TDR market by expanding receiving area mechanisms so that more TDR sales could occurthereby improving residenal density. b. Develop a fund to buyout the outstanding TDRs. c. Terminate the TDRs and rezone the TDR sending areas with low density rural zoning and the receiving areaswith high density residenal zoning. Andrew stated that because development in the sending NRP areas is already restricted, the TDRs may not serve a conservaon funcon. He quesoned whether areas where TDRs have been sold could be subsequently rezoned to allow for development. He then expanded on a memo that he had circulated to members before the meeng by summarizing research he had done in other states where TDR models have been implemented. He said that in some places land owners are encouraged to sell the development rights to their property voluntarily to limit further development (the encouragement model). In other areas municipalies have established a migaon model by downzoning property to severely restrict development and then as “quid pro quo” providing TDRs to the property owner whose development rights have already been curtailed. South Burlington has adopted the migaon model. Tim posited that TDRs are the “bad boys” of development in the SEQ because they allow for (encourage) higher density than zoning provides, much to the objecon of the neighbors. He opined that TDRs have a negave effect because they encourage higher density where it shouldn’t exist. He cited Spear Meadows and Dorset Meadows as examples where the proposed higher density developments were ed up in ligaon by opponents, neighbors, who feel that that density (which TDRs provided) should not be allowed. He acknowledged that higher density is not all bad per se and is certainly good for land owners. He advocates that TDRs should be used somewhere else outside of the SEQ. Also, he does not advocate, nor feel an obligaon, to make the holders of TDRs “whole”. Andrew expressed his personal concerns about global warming and environmental effects detailing his own history in working to combat it. He suggested that these issues should be aligned with the work of the Commiee in dealing with TDRs. The Commiee revisited the issue of whether the severing of development rights, as set forth in the SB TDRs, permanently conserves the property from which it is severed. It was decided by consensus to refer that queson to Amanda Lafferty, Asst. City Aorney, for an opinion. Monica sent Amanda an email to that effect during the meeng. Tom quesoned whether the resistance to development by SEQ residents is strictly a NIMBY issue. Other members responded that residents are passionate about not wanng to see the City’s open spaces destroyed and the importance of preserving them. Mike noted that the adopon of Interim Zoning was in response to this passion. Kelly stated that the City has spoken through the Comprehensive Plan and that LDRs do not align with the Comprehensive Plan. With me running short Mike assigned research roles to the members to explore proposals to see if they would be workable and how they would be implemented. The proposals and tasks were as follows: a. Mike agreed to work on exploring ways to make the TDRs markets more viable while achieving the overallobjecves. b. Tom agreed to explore how TDRs could be terminated with substute zoning designed to achieve the sameobjecves and be fair to TDR holders. c. Andrew agreed to explore how TDRs could be effecve in achieving the value of conserving open space. d. Tim agreed to work on developing a fact sheet that explains the current status of TDRs in a way that will beunderstandable to the public. Mike indicated he would follow up on the status of a representave from the Economic Development Commiee. (5) Adjourn The next meeng of the Commiee is scheduled for 7:00 PM on Wednesday, February 20th at the South Burlington Police Staon, 19 Gregory Drive. Tom moved and Tim seconded that the meeng adjourn. With unanimous approval the meeng adjourned at 9:05 PM. Tom Bailey, Clerk Meeng minutes approved on April 4, 2019