HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda 06_SD-24-08_850 Hinesburg Rd_WGM Assoc
180 Market Street, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 | 802-846-4106 | www.southburlingtonvt.gov
TO: South Burlington Development Review Board
FROM: Marla Keene, Development Review Planner
SUBJECT: #SD-24-08 850 Hinesburg Road
DATE: October 15, 2024 Development Review Board meeting
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Preliminary plat application #SD-24-08 of WGM Associates for phase one of a concurrent master
plan for a development consisting of eleven single family homes and an existing non-conforming
commercial or private parking facility. The phase consists of the creation of seven lots, three
containing existing single family homes, two to contain new homes, one to contain an existing
non-conforming commercial or private parking facility and new home, and one civic space lot, 850
Hinesburg Road.
CONTEXT
The Board began review of the application on September 4, 2024. They discussed Staff comments
#1 through 5, with comment #6 through 11 remaining. The applicant also submitted revised
materials one day prior to packet publication. Staff has attempted to incorporate those revisions
into this report but there was insufficient time for interdepartmental review.
This memorandum provides a summary of the revised materials & the initial presentation of
comments #6 through 11. Where the Board indicated satisfaction with a criterion on September 4,
and no changes are proposed affecting compliance with the criterion, the criterion is omitted from
this memorandum.
COMMENTS
Development Review Planner Marla Keene and Director of Planning and Zoning Paul Conner,
hereafter referred to as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted by the applicant and offer the
following comments. Numbered comments for the Board’s attention are in red.
B) PUD & GENERAL PUD STANDARDS
The applicant is proposing a General PUD.
15.C.04 PUD Standards Applicable to All PUD Types
A. Conformance with the Comprehensive Plan
The proposed PUD must conform to the City’s Comprehensive Plan in effect at the time of
application. Conformance with the plan in this context means that the proposed PUD must:
1) Advance any clearly stated plan policies and objectives specific to the type and location of
the proposed development;
The proposed project is located within the Commercia/Industrial with Supporting Uses
future land use category of the 2024 City Plan. However, Staff considers the adoption of
Act 47 requires the Board to approve additional subdivision and housing in this location
due to the allowance of residential uses in the Industrial/Open Space Zoning District.
Goals for this location include:
• Goal 80: Reduce commuting distance and daytime vehicle travel by integrating
supporting services to commercial areas
• Goal 81: Make commercial areas more diverse in spaces, styles, and uses to enable
more nimble commercial use
In addition, applicable goals to the type of development include
• Goal 1: Anticipate and prepare for an average annual population growth rate of
approximately 1 – 1.5% and a housing growth rate of 1.5 – 2%,
• Goal 3: Increase rental vacancy rate to 5% as a proxy for a healthy and well-
supplied rental housing market
The City Plan broadly supports both economic development and housing. In this area, the
Plan largely envisions commercial/industrial uses, however Act 47 provides allowances for
compact housing in residentially-enabled districts served by water & sewer. Staff considers
that in this intervening time between the enactment of Act 47 and alignment of local
regulations consistent with the Act and the City Plan, the application should be viewed in a
broad light under this criterion.
Staff notes the regulations are set up to require an urban form, and the applicant’s proposal is
unusual in that it takes advantage of the dichotomy between the existing zoning and Act 47 to
propose a density lower than would otherwise be permitted for residential development. The
Board on September 4 indicated they felt bound by Act 47 to accept the applicant’s proposal for
relatively low density housing in this location. However, Staff has continued to include the above
discussion as it pertains to conformance with the Master Plan, discussed immediately below.
B. Conformance with the Master Plan
Each phase of a PUD developed in one or more phases must conform to the PUD Master Plan, as
approved or amended by the DRB under Article 15.B, including the approved development plan,
phasing schedule, buildout budget, management plan, and any associated development
agreements or conditions of master plan approval.
The applicant is proposing to postpone a number of infrastructure elements which will be located
geometrically in Phase 1 for construction during a future phase of the project. Specifically, they
are proposing
1. To install a 1-1/2” water line in Phase 1 which must in Phase 2 be replaced with an 8-inch
water line
2. To install a gravel road which must be paved in Phase 2
3. To omit a sidewalk which must be added in Phase 2.
These latter two elements fall under the alternative compliance provision of PUD review. The
alternative compliance criteria of review are provided below.
(a) Conforms to the intent, description, and defining characteristics of the selected PUD
type(s);
(b) Achieves the intent of the PUD standard to be modified;
(c) Results in development that is equivalent or demonstrably superior in function,
design, and quality to that required under the standard to be modified; and
(d) Does not adversely impact properties, uses or facilities within, adjacent to, or in the
vicinity of the planned development (e.g., regarding walkability, traffic, parking,
drainage).
The Board on September 4 discussed the proposal for alternative compliance in the context of
Phase 1. Staff would like to call the Board’s attention to an additional point, which is that
permitting improvement of Phase 1 to be deferred to future phases would place a disproportionate
burden on the cost of developing future phases.
Staff reminds the Board that Phase 1 includes three of the eight proposed homes. However, these
improvements will be required whether future development of the lot consists of residential
development as proposed in this master plan, or of commercial development which will become
an option after expiration of the 6 to 10 year master plan.
1. Staff recommends the Board consider the impacts of the applicant’s request for deferring
improvements in totality and determine whether to permit it.
The remainder of this report was not reviewed on September 4, 2024. It has been updated to
reflect the recently submitted revised plans.
C) SUBDIVISION STANDARDS
15.C.04C, pertaining to compliance with regulations for all PUD types, states that the provisions
specific to a PUD supersede underlying zoning district, subdivision, and site plan standards.
Therefore only standards not directly superseded by PUD standards are discussed herein.
15.A.14 Street Network
C. Street Design.
The street network must incorporate allowed Street Types under Article 11.A, or as specified by Zoning
District, Transect Zone or type of Planned Unit Development, which are consistent with the functional
class and the pattern and type of development or uses to be served by the street network. Streets
must be designed by a Vermont licensed professional engineer and constructed to City specifications.
Proposed street types and functional classifications must be identified on subdivision plans submitted
with the application.
The Director of Public Works reviewed the revised plans on October 15, 2024 and offers the
following updated comments on Phase 1.
• The proposed gravel road shall remain private. Under no circumstances will the city
consider acceptance of a gravel road now, or in the future.
• It is my understanding that the sewer line will remain privately owned to the point where it
connects to the existing city owned pipe east of the project site.
• The project shall be constructed in accordance with South Burlington Public Works
Standards and Specifications.
Staff note: Staff recommends the Board modify this statement to specify that the project
shall be constructed in accordance with South Burlington Public Works Standards and
Specifications except as modifications are specifically approved.
• The proposed road appears to have a 10% grade. This is the maximum allowed and should
be monitored closely during construction.
• Please confirm that appropriate site distances are provided at intersections. A table on
sheet C4.0 indicates that this is not the case somewhere on the project.
• The minimum driveway culvert is 15”. The minimum pipe size for culverts across
roadways is 18”.
• The project must obtain drinking water and wastewater allocations.
Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to address the comments pertaining to design
changes at the final plat stage of review and incorporate the ongoing comments as conditions.
15.A.15 Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, and Recreation Paths
The applicant has made their request to include the sidewalk within the roadway cross section for
Phase 1, discussed above.
15.A.16 Blocks and Lots
These elements are discussed in conjunction with concurrent master plan MP-24-01 and are
recommended for vesting.
15.A.17 Mix of Dwelling Unit Types
This is addressed under PUD standards above.
15.A.18 Infrastructure, Utilities, and Services
A. Capacity of Community Facilities, Utilities and Services. The applicant must demonstrate
that the proposed subdivision and development will not exceed the existing or planned capacity
of, or cause a disproportionate or unreasonable burden on City facilities, utilities and services,
including:
• Public schools,
• Police, fire protection and ambulance services,
• Street infrastructure and maintenance,
• Parks and recreation facilities, and
• Water supply, wastewater disposal, and stormwater management systems and infrastructure.
Comments of the relevant departments have been included in the applicable sections of this
memorandum and the September 4 report.
B. Potable Water Supply and Wastewater Systems. The applicant must demonstrate that
adequate potable water supply and wastewater facilities exist to serve the subdivision at buildout,
and for each phase of development.
The project is proposed to be connected to the City’s water supply and wastewater system.
In addition to the comments provided on concurrent MP-24-03, the South Burlington Water
Department Superintendent provided comments on the updated plans on October 11, 2024 as
follows.
1. The curb stop for the proposed service line shall be installed just inside the Hinesburg Rd
ROW.
2. Waterline size and material shall be noted on the plans.
3. The proposed 1-1/2” line should end at the blow-off and not be continued beyond.
4. The proposed water line serving the new homes with residential fire sprinkler system shall
be properly sized by an approved fire sprinkler design engineer to meet all City and State
fire code requirements.
Staff note: See comment below pertaining to similar comment from the Fire Marshal.
5. The water line and appurtenances shall be considered private and subject to all conditions
required in the South Burlington Water Ordinance.
6. An easement to each curb stop and the blow-off assembly shall be provided to the City for
the operation of each curb stop and blow-off as needed. Maintenance and repairs of each
curb stop and the blow-off shall remain the responsibility of the owners.
7. There is a 1” Irrigation Water Connection with Yard Hydrant identified on the plans. What is
this connecting to?
2. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to modify the plans to comply with the
comments and respond to the question of the South Burlington Water Department
Superintendent as part of the final plat application.
C. Fire Protection. The subdivision must be laid out to ensure that adequate fire protection
can be provided in accordance with City specifications.
The Fire Marshal provided updated comments on the revised plans on October 17, 2024 and offers
the following comments.
• The project shall meet NFPA 1 (2015) Chapter 18 for FD access & water supply.
• Required 20 foot wide road that can support 65,000 # apparatus. T or K turnaround to
allow turning to the WB-40 (1990) std.
Staff note: The South Burlington Public Works Standards and Specifications include
the necessary turning radius to permit the required turning movement.
• Buildings required to have NFPA 13-D sprinkler system installed as minimum, or a fire
suppression hydrant(s)comply with NFPA 24, on a minimum 6” line providing a
minimum of 850 gpm.
Staff note: Based on conversations with the South Burlington Water Superintendent
and Fire Marshal, Staff considers this comment can be more plainly stated that there
are concerns about the ability of a 1-1/2” water line to provide adequate fire
suppression pressure for a NFPA 13-D sprinkler system.
3. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to demonstrate satisfactory fire
pressure flow as part of the final plat application.
• Water department standards shall apply.
• If owners are installing fire suppression hydrant(s), the hydrant(s) shall be installed,
properly flushed and hydrant flow test conducted, before any combustible construction
can begin.
Staff note: More plainly stated, if the Board determines a water line suitable for serving
the remainder of the master plan to be required as part of Phase 1, the applicant will be
installing a hydrant instead of sprinkler systems for the individual homes.
D. Stormwater Facilities. The applicant must demonstrate that stormwater management
system serving the subdivision has been designed to meet City standards and specifications under
Article 13 of these regulations and the South Burlington Ordinance Regulating the use of Public and
Private Sanitary Sewerage and Stormwater Systems.
(1) Planned Unit Developments. For the purposes of determining applicability in Section
13.05B of these regulations, in the instance of a Planned Unit Development, the applicant
shall calculate the impervious coverage on the entire PUD, rather than lot or parcel. The
stormwater management requirements will apply to all PUDs within the City of South
Burlington where one-half acre or more of impervious surface area exists or is proposed to
exist.
The South Burlington Stormwater Superintendent reviewed the plans on July 8, 2024 and
offers the following comments.
1. Please provide the HydroCAD model for review. Also please note that the HydroCAD
print-outs included in the application do not include any routing from the drainage areas
to the gravel wetland and therefore do not provide any information on how the gravel
wetland will perform during any storm event.
2. Sheet SW-1:
a. How will the applicant ensure that all runoff from the road enters the gravel wetland
system through the pre-treatment forebay? Note in particular that runoff from the
hammerhead will be able to flow freely into the gravel wetland without receiving
pre-treatment.
b. This is quite a steep road. How will the applicant prevent runoff from the south side
of the road from scouring the adjacent land and causing erosion issues? Staff
recommends the inclusion of a stone-lined swale on the south side in addition to
the one on the north.
c. Grading is insufficient to determine routing of runoff from the proposed driveways
and buildings. How will the applicant ensure that all runoff from the driveways and
homes makes it into the gravel wetland system?
d. Staff recommends increasing the size of the driveway culverts from 12” to 15”.
3. The applicant has not yet provided any response to the previously provided comments of
the City Stormwater Department. Staff considers the comments of the Stormwater
Superintendent, while significant, will not require a complete reconfiguration of the
proposed stormwater management system and therefore recommends the Board require
them to be addressed at the final plat stage of review.
E. Utilities and Services.
The applicant must demonstrate that subdivision design has been coordinated with utility
companies serving the proposed subdivision, as necessary for the DRB to determine that adequate
service capacity exists and that the areas identified for utility installation, on subdivision plans and
plat, meet the requirements of these Regulations.
(1) Utility connections must be provided to each building lot, and to other subdivision lots on
which service is necessary or required.
(2) Utilities must be located within street rights-of-way, or within permanent utility access and
maintenance easements identified on subdivision plans and plats.
(3) New electrical, natural gas, telephone, internet, cable television, and outdoor lighting systems
must be installed underground, unless prevented by ledge or other physical constraints that
make burying utility lines impractical.
(4) Utility lines or corridors must be located and designed in a manner that is compatible with the
extension of utilities and services to adjacent properties.
Staff recommends the Board include a condition requiring utility lines to be underground.
F. Street and Sidewalk Lighting.
Where provided along local and collector streets, street and sidewalk lighting must be pedestrian-
scaled (e.g., 12 to 14 feet in height) to ensure pedestrian safety traveling to and from public spaces.
Overall illumination levels should be consistent with the development patterns and character of
the neighborhood, with smooth levels of illumination (rather than hotspots) and light trespass
minimized to the lowest level consistent with public safety.
The applicant is not proposing street or sidewalk lighting.
G. Renewable Energy Facilities.
The applicant must demonstrate that, to the extent physically feasible, reasonable, and as
appropriate to its development context, the subdivision has been designed to incorporate best
practices that maintain access to and use of renewable energy resources, e.g., to include one or
more of the following as indicated on subdivision plans and plats:
(1) Street and building lots that are oriented to maximize solar access and gain, for passive solar
construction or rooftop solar installations.
(2) Parking lots or structures that are designed and constructed to accommodate electric vehicle
infrastructure, including charging stations and solar canopies or rooftop solar installations.
(3) One or more suitable open areas (“solar lots”) within the subdivision that are specifically
designated for a ground-mounted community or neighborhood solar installation.
(4) Solar access easements, as necessary to maintain solar access across adjoining building lots
or properties.
(5) Covenants, deed restrictions or other legal mechanisms that require “solar-ready”
construction within the subdivision.
The property has an existing ground mounted solar array that is located in a corner of the proposed
Civic Space. Staff considers these criteria to be met.
D) SITE PLAN & CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW STANDARDS
As a PUD, these criteria are applicable.
14.06 General Review Standards
A. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site.
(1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from
structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and
adequate parking areas. The DRB shall consider the following:
(a) Street Frontage. Maintain internally-consistent building setbacks and landscaping along
the street.
The applicant has requested a front setback waiver to 30 ft.
(b) Building Placement, Orientation. Maintain or establish a consistent orientation to the
street and, where a prevalent pattern exists, shall continue the manner in which the site’s
existing building foundations relate to the site’s topography and grade.
The applicant’s conceptual plans indicate future buildings oriented to the street. 13.17
requires buildings to face the street. Staff considers this criterion met.
(c) Transition Contrast in Scale. Minimize and mitigate abrupt contrasts in scale between
existing, planned or approved development, and proposed development.
Staff considers the proposed single-family homes to be consistent with existing
development.
(d) Pedestrian Orientation. Improve and enhance pedestrian connections and walkability
within the area proposed for development.
The applicant has requested alternative compliance for the standard requiring a sidewalk
along the proposed street.
(e) Solar Gain. Orient their rooflines to maximize solar gain potential, to the extent possible
within the context of the overall standards of these regulations.
4. Staff recommends the Board discuss whether they will include a condition requiring solar
orientation given the existing ground mounted solar array.
(2) Parking.
(a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Any side of a building facing a public
street shall be considered a front side of a building for the purposes of this subsection.
Single family homes and duplexes are exempt from this criterion.
B. Relationship of Structures and Site to Adjoining Area
1) The Development Review Board shall encourage the use of a combination of common
materials and architectural characteristics (e.g., rhythm, color, texture, form or detailing),
landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions
between buildings of different architectural styles.
The applicant has provided a document describing the characteristics proposed for buildings
on Lots 1C and 1D. They have argued that the proposed building on Lot 1B is exempt from
building design requirements due to the lot size being over 1 acre. However, there is no
such lot size exemption from this criterion therefore Staff recommends the Board apply the
same characteristics to the proposed construction on Lot 1B.
The proposed characteristics are as follows. These would be in addition to dimensional
standards.
• Front Door facing the street
• Front Porch facing south
• Higher proportion of glazing facing south
• Ridge Line running east-west
• Dark color roof
• Recessed Garage façade
• Garage width <40% of Total Building street façade length
• Yard area of >100 SF
2) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing
buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures.
Staff considers the above criterion and the layout of the site to result in compliance with this
criterion.
3) To accomplish (1) and (2), the DRB shall consider:
a. Pattern and Rhythm. Update or maintain or extend the overall pattern of
development defined by the planned or existing street grid, block configurations,
position and orientation of principal buildings, prevalence of attached or detached
building types.
Staff considers the street and block configurations and position of buildings to be
consistent with the setting.
b. Architectural Features. Respond to recurring or representative architectural
features that define neighborhood character, without adhering to a particular
architectural style.
Staff considers the above commitments to result in compliance with this criterion.
c. Privacy. Limit impacts and intrusions to privacy on adjoining properties, including
side and back yard areas through context sensitive design.
Staff considers privacy to adjoining properties to not be an issue in this setting.
C. Site Amenity Requirement
(3) The required area shall be:
(a) For Non-Residential development, a minimum of 6% of non-residential building gross floor
area.
(b) For Residential development, determined by number of units as:
(i) For fewer than 10 units, 100 square feet per unit;
(ii) For 10 to 19 units, 85 square feet per unit; or
(iii) For 20 or more units, 60 square feet per unit.
For the proposed 11 homes in the master plan, 935 sf site amenity is required.
(4) The DRB may, in its discretion, provide a credit for up to 50% of the required Site Amenity area if
the Applicant demonstrates a safe, walkable connection to an existing Civic Space or public park
that is accessible by the general public and located within five-hundred (500) feet of at least one
pedestrian access point for each building on the lot via a walking route and/or pedestrian way. A
“safe, walkable connection” shall not include or require crossing a four-lane road.
(a) The DRB may, in its discretion, give a partial credit for the required Site Amenity area if some
but not all the buildings on the lot have pedestrian access points located within five-hundred
(500) feet of the Civic Space or public park, as described in Section 14.06(D)(4), above.
(b) The DRB cannot provide any credit to replace the remaining 50% of the Site Amenity area.
The applicant has provided a Civic Space in Phase 1, which is within 500-ft of and accessible to
each of the proposed homes. In addition, each home will have a private yard space, which the
applicant has above committed to being at least 100 sf. Staff considers this criterion met.
14.07 Specific Review Standards
In all Zoning Districts and the City Center Form Based Codes District, the following standards shall
apply:
A. Environmental Protection Standards
All proposed development shall be subject to the applicable requirements of Article 12,
Environmental Protection Standards.
Discussion of specific requirements for environmental protection is included under Article 12 below.
B. Site Design Features.
All proposed development shall comply with standards for the placement of buildings, parking and
loading areas, landscaping and screening, open space, stormwater, lighting, and other applicable
standards related to site design pursuant to these Land Development Regulations.
These standards are discussed elsewhere in this report.
C. Access and Circulation. All proposed development shall comply with site access and
circulation standards of Section 15.A.14.
15.A.14 is discussed above.
D. [Reserved for Transportation Demand Management (TDM)]
E. Building Form. Development within the City Center Form Based Code District, the Urban
Design Overlay District, and other districts with supplemental building form standards shall adhere to
the standards contained therein.
There are no supplemental building standards beyond those discussed under 14.06 above.
F. Streetscape Improvements. A proposed new construction or extension/expansion of an
existing structure exceeding the thresholds listed in either (a) Section 14.09(B) or (b) Section 8.11(D)
within the City Center Form Based Code, or Section 3.11(D) in all other zoning districts, shall be
required to upgrade adjacent sidewalks, greenbelts, and related street furniture (trees, benches, etc.)
to the standards contained within the applicable Street Type and Building Envelope Standard.
Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to limit requirements for additional upgrades as
necessary to meet the requirements of these Regulations.
Required streetscape improvements are discussed pertaining to subdivision standards above.
G. Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land may be required on any lot for
provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb
cuts onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes,
or to improve general access and circulation in the area.
The applicant has included on their proposed plat a 40-ft easement to be converted to a future 40-ft
right of way with development of phase 2. Staff considers this criterion met.
H. Utility Services.
Electric, telephone and other wire-served utility lines and service connections shall be underground
insofar as feasible and subject to state public utilities regulations. Any utility installations
remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring
properties and to the site. Standards of Section 15.A.18, Infrastructure, Utilities, and Services, shall
also be met.
Staff recommends the Board include a condition that all wire served utilities are required to be
underground.
I. Disposal of Wastes.
All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling,
composting, or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque
fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). Small receptacles intended
for use by households or the public (i.e., non-dumpster, non-large drum) shall not be required to be
fenced or screened.
Staff considers this criterion to be not applicable for the proposed residential development.
E) ARTICLE 12: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STANDARDS
12.06 Wetland Protection Standards
The applicant has identified a potential wetland buffer on their plans, which they are proposing to
encapsulate within the required Civic Space. This area is currently maintained as lawn. Staff
understands the applicant has not performed a wetland delineation and has instead supplied the
wetland location based on plans for the adjoining site. No wetland report is available. Staff
considers in the absence of a specific wetland delineation, the buffer should be treated in
accordance with the standards of this section.
D. Standards for Wetlands Protection.
(4) Pre-existing gardens, landscaped areas/lawns, structures and impervious surfaces.
(a) Gardens, landscaped areas/lawns, structures, and impervious surfaces located within a
wetlands buffer that were legally in existence as of the effective date of these regulations
shall be considered non-conforming development. Non-conforming development within a
wetlands buffer may not be expanded.
E. Exemptions.
The following activities are not required to meet the standards in this section and do not require a
local permit:
(1) Maintenance of Pre-Existing Gardens, Landscaped Areas/Lawns, Structures and
Impervious Surfaces. Maintenance of pre-existing gardens, landscaped areas/lawns, structures
and impervious surfaces located within a wetlands buffer, and that were legally in existence as of
the effective date of these regulations, does not require a permit.
(2) Invasive Species, Nuisance Plants, and Noxious Weeds Removal. Hand removal (e.g.
non-motorized or non-mechanized) of invasive species, nuisance plants, and noxious weeds, as
identified by the Vermont Agency of Agriculture, Food & Markets, within Class I, Class II, and Class
III wetlands, and their associated buffers, is exempt from these regulations.
(3) Trails. Establishment and maintenance of unpaved, non-motorized trails, and associate
puncheons and boardwalks, not to exceed ten (10) feet in width located within the buffer area of
a Class I, Class II or Class III wetland. All trails located within this buffer area should be constructed
to meet the best practices outlined in the Recreational Trail Building Guidance document
developed by the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources.
5. Staff recommends the Board consider whether these criteria permit the applicant to convert
the existing lawn area to a community garden or whether it must be maintained as lawn.
The applicant may also revert it to an unmaintained wetland area at their choosing.
F. Modifications.
(1) Types of Development. An applicant may request a modification, in writing, from the rules of
this section for any development in the following areas only:
(b) Re-development of pre-existing gardens, landscaped areas/lawns, public infrastructure,
structures, and impervious surfaces within a Class II wetland buffer in any zoning district if;
(i) The resulting total area of lands within the wetland buffer that will be in a naturally
vegetated condition is increased;
(ii) The applicant submits an evidence-based professional opinion by a wetland scientist that
the re-development will have a net positive effect on the health and functioning of the
wetland; and
(iii) The project results in no increase in total impervious surface within the Class II wetland
buffer.
If the Board determines conversion to community garden from lawn is not exempted under
E(1) above, Staff considers the proposed impacts to be potentially eligible for modification,
though a wetland delineation and report identifying wetland functions and values would be
required.
(3) Modification Standards. The Development Review Board or the Administrative Officer, as
applicable, may grant a modification from the rules of this Section only if a modification
application meets all the following standards:
(a) The modification shall be the minimum required to accommodate the proposed
development;
(b) The proposed development will not have an undue adverse effect on the planned character
of the area, as defined by the purpose statement of the zoning district within which the
project is located, or on public health and safety;
(c) The proposed development will not have an undue adverse effect on the ability of the
property to adequately treat stormwater from the site; and,
(d) The proposed development will not have an undue adverse effect upon specific wetland
functions and values identified in the field delineation.
6. If the Board determines conversion to community garden from lawn is not exempted under
section (E) above, this section (F) describes an alternative path forward. Specifically, this
section permits modification of wetland standards if the applicant provides a wetland
delineation report enumerating the specific functions and values, lists the area of impact,
and demonstrates that the area of impact has been minimized. If the Board determines
conversion is not exempted under (E) above, Staff recommends the Board discuss with the
applicant whether they will provide documentation of compliance with this section or
whether they will instead remove their proposed impacts and instead allow the impacted
buffer to regrow into a naturally vegetated state.
E) OTHER APPLICABLE STANDARDS
3.18 Residential and Commercial Building Energy Standards
A. Applicability.
This section shall apply to the receipt of a zoning permit for the construction and subsequent
alteration of all new principal buildings beginning December 1, 2015, or the date that this Section
3.17 becomes effective, whichever is later.
B. Residential Building Energy Standards (RBES).
Residential buildings, as defined by 30 V.S.A. section 51(a)(2), that are principal building, shall comply
with the Stretch Code, as defined by 30 V.S.A. section 53)a). Such buildings for which the RBES
Certificate certifying compliance with the Stretch Code is not recorded in the South Burlington Land
Records shall be deemed land development without a zoning permit in violation of these Regulations.
This standard applies to this project.
13.04 Landscaping, Screening, and Street Trees
There is no minimum required landscaping budget for this project. The applicant is proposing
fourteen (14) street trees installed at 2.5 – 3” caliper of three maple species. The City of South
Burlington Public Works specifications require no more than 50% of any one species. This is
proposed to be met. The City arborist reviewed the provided plans on October 16, 2024 and offers
the following comment.
Landscaping looks Ok, may want to suggest a genus other than maple as maples are
overplanted in South Burlington. Freeman Maples are probably more adapted to the existing
soils than Red Maples.
The applicant has also provided a tree protection plan.
7. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to address the comment of the City Arborist
at the final plat stage of review.
13.05 Stormwater Management
This chapter includes application requirements and design requirements for on-site treatment and
for impacts to the municipal system. The City Stormwater Section reviewed the plans on July 8,
2024. Comments are provided above.
13.12 Utility Cabinets and Similar Structures
This section pertains to utility cabinets on their own lot. The applicant is proposing to locate an
existing silo containing cell tower equipment on a 6,100 square foot (0.14 acre) lot. Assuming the
Board accepts the silo as a utility cabinet or similar structure as part of concurrent master plan
#MP-24-03, the following criterion are applicable.
A. General Requirements.
In any district, the Development Review Board may grant site plan approval for the construction of
a utility cabinet or similar structure according to the following regulations.
B. Specific Standards for Utility Cabinets and Similar Structures.
(1) The facility shall serve the City of South Burlington and/or immediately adjacent communities.
Based on verbal information provided by the applicant, Staff understands this to be true.
(2) The minimum required lot for a public utility cabinet, substation, or communication relay
station on its own parcel may be reduced from the zoning district requirements, at the
discretion of the Development Review Board. In the event that the facility shall be erected on
property not owned by the utility, the Development Review Board shall require that the facility
be located unobtrusively.
The minimum lot size in the zoning district is modified by Act 47 to 8,712 sf, since the zoning
district permits single family homes.
(3) If the parcel containing the facility is landlocked, there shall be a recorded easement or
permission granting access to the utility or owner of the facility.
8. The utility exists therefore Staff assumes there is adequate access. Under proposed
conditions, the parcel will be directly adjacent to the project roadway. Staff recommends
the Board require the applicant to demonstrate compliance with this criterion by providing
documentation of existing access at the final plat stage of review.
(4) There shall be sufficient landscaping or fencing of sufficient height and opacity to screen
effectively the facility year-round from streets and abutting unaffiliated properties.
Staff recommends the Board waive this requirement. The silo is an important element of the
South Burlington skyline as seen when looking towards Mt. Mansfield from Wheeler Nature Park.
(5) The location of the facility shall be shown on all relevant site plans.
This criterion is met.
(6) Utility cabinets and similar structures shall be located a minimum of five (5) feet from all
existing or planned public roads or rights-of-way.
This criterion is met.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board discuss the project with the applicant and close the hearing.
Staff recommends the Board not close the preliminary plat until they close the master plan since
the preliminary plat cannot be approved before the master plan.
Respectfully submitted,
Marla Keene, P.E.
Senior Development Review Planner
SHED
HOUSE
(#950)
GARAGE
GARAGE
(#896)
SHED
HOUSE
(#900)
HOUSE
(#896)
SHED
SILO
(898)
725.79' N 83°09'1
5
"
E
59
8
.
9
4
'
S
0
4
°
5
0
'
1
1
"
E
S 83°07'45" W
727.48'
N
0
5
°
5
3
'
2
1
"
W
4
2
0
.
7
2
'
17
8
.
9
1
'
N
0
1
°
4
9
'
1
2
"
W
SHED
W
?
DE
C
K
PRESUMED WETLAND (AS
SHOWN ON PREVIOUS
LANE PRESS PLANS)
HI
N
E
S
B
U
R
G
R
O
A
D
S
S
50'
WETL
A
N
D
BUFF
E
R
50' WETL
A
N
D
BUFFER
F.F. 408.0
F.F. 396.0
F.F. 384.0
S
MAXINE'S WAY
CLOSE-OFF EXIST. CURB CUT
WITH THE REMOVAL OF THE
DRIVEWAY GRAVEL AND
REPLACEMENT WITH LAWN
AREA. SAWCUT AND REMOVE
EXISTING PAVED APRON.
CONVERT OVER-WIDE
AREA BY REMOVING
DRIVEWAY GRAVEL
AND REPLACEMENT
WITH LAWN AREA
40
'
M
A
X
.
MINIMUM APRON
PAVING LIMITS
PROPOSED STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT FACILITY
STONE LINED
SWALE (TYP.)
PROPOSED 20' WIDE
NEIGHBORHOOD STREET - NARROW
(PRIVATE STREET)
(SEE DETAIL ON SHT. C4.0)
FUTURE CONNECTOR ROAD TO BE
CONSTRUCTED UPON FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT OF LOTS 2 AND 3.
EASEMENT LIMITS ARE SHOWN ON
SURVEY PLAT SHT. P1
LOT 1E ACCESSORY STRUCTURE
BUILDING ENVELOPE
PROPOSED BUILDING
ENVELOPE (TYP.)
CONCEPTUAL SINGLE
FAMILY HOME
LOCATION (TYP.)
S
R1
5
4
.
0
'
R1
5
4
.
0
'
LOT 1A
0.26 ACRES
LOT 1B
1.03 ACRES
LOT 1C
0.43 ACRES LOT 1D
0.57 ACRES
LOT 2
2.64 ACRES
LOT 3
3.02 ACRES
CONCEPTUAL SINGLE
2-BR ACCESSORY
DWELLING UNIT (ADU)
F.F. 380.0
WETLAND BUFFER
IN OPEN SPACE
(3,366 S.F.)
WETLAND BUFFER
IN OPEN SPACE
(7,582 S.F.)
LOT 4
1.00 ACRE
MAXINE'S WAY
F.F. 418.0±
LOT 1E
0.09 ACRES
R.O.W.
1.01 ACRES
WATER DISTRIBUTION
FLOW CONTROL VALVE
LEGEND
W
4/24/24 DSM REVISED PER VTRANS REVIEW
FM
G
ST
S
T
W
E
PROPOSED CONTOUR100
PROPOSED CURB
PROPOSED FENCE
PROPOSED GRAVEL
PROPOSED PAVEMENT
PROPOSED GUARD RAIL
PROPOSED SWALE
PROPOSED ELECTRIC
PROPOSED FORCEMAIN
PROPOSED GAS
PROPOSED STORM
PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER
PROPOSED TELEPHONE
PROPOSED WATER
PROPOSED WELL
S PROPOSED SEWER MANHOLE
D PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN
REBAR SET
CONCRETE MONUMENT SET
PROPOSED HYDRANT
PROPOSED SHUT OFF
PROPOSED UTILITY POLE
PROPOSED LIGHT POLE
PROPOSED EDGE OF BRUSH/WOODS
PROPOSED SETBACK LINE
PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
1.UTILITIES SHOWN DO NOT PURPORT TO CONSTITUTE OR REPRESENT ALL UTILITIES LOCATED
UPON OR ADJACENT TO THE SURVEYED PREMISES. EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE
APPROXIMATE ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL UTILITY CONFLICTS. ALL
DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT DIG
SAFE (888-344-7233) PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. IN ADDITION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE A
PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATING FIRM TO LOCATE OWNER OWNED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO
START OF ANY EXCAVATION.
2.ALL EXISTING UTILITIES NOT INCORPORATED INTO THE FINAL DESIGN SHALL BE REMOVED OR
ABANDONED AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS OR DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS (WITH TIES) FOR ALL UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES. THOSE PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER AT THE COMPLETION OF THE
PROJECT.
4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR/RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS (ON OR OFF THE SITE) AS A
DIRECT OR INDIRECT RESULT OF THE CONSTRUCTION.
5.ALL GRASSED AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL FULL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED.
6.MAINTAIN ALL TREES OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.
7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE AND
OPERABLE FACILITIES AND UTILITIES.
8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ALL ITEMS AND MATERIALS
INCORPORATED INTO THE SITE WORK. WORK SHALL NOT BEGIN ON ANY ITEM UNTIL SHOP
DRAWING APPROVAL IS GRANTED.
9.IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS SET IN THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL PERMIT CONDITIONS AND
ANY LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS STANDARDS.
10.THE TOLERANCE FOR FINISH GRADES FOR ALL PAVEMENT, WALKWAYS AND LAWN AREAS SHALL BE
0.1 FEET. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL EXISTING MANHOLE COVERS, VALVES, CURB STOPS AND
OTHER ITEMS TO REMAIN SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO THE NEW FINISH GRADE.
11.ANY DEWATERING NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE SITEWORK SHALL BE CONSIDERED
AS PART OF THE CONTRACT AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY.
12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITHIN STATE HIGHWAY VT116 R.O.W. WITH
VTRANS AUTHORITIES.
13.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE ELECTRICAL, CABLE AND TELEPHONE SERVICES IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES REQUIREMENTS.
14.EXISTING PAVEMENT AND TREE STUMPS TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT AN
APPROVED OFF-SITE LOCATION. ALL PAVEMENT CUTS SHALL BE MADE WITH A PAVEMENT SAW.
15.IF THERE ARE ANY CONFLICTS OR INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS, THE
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER FOR VERIFICATION BEFORE WORK CONTINUES ON
THE ITEM IN QUESTION.
16.PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION IS APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON EXISTING TAX MAP INFORMATION.
THIS PLAN IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY AND IS NOT INTENDED TO BE USED AS ONE.
17.IF THE BUILDING IS TO BE SPRINKLERED, BACKFLOW PREVENTION SHALL BE PROVIDED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA M14. THE SITE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT THE WATER LINE TO
TWO FEET ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR. SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR RISER DETAIL.
18.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES
INDICATED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, TYPICAL FOR CONCRETE AND SOIL TESTING.
19.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL LAYOUT AND FIELD ENGINEERING REQUIRED FOR
COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES WILL PROVIDE AN AUTOCAD FILE
WHERE APPLICABLE.
20.THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ANY AND ALL SAFETY FENCES OR
RAILS ABOVE EXISTING AND PROPOSED WALLS. THE OWNER SHALL VERIFY LOCAL, STATE AND
INSURANCE REQUIREMENT GUIDELINES FOR THE INSTALLATION AND VERIFY ANY AND ALL
PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS.
GENERAL NOTES
PROPOSED GUY WIRE/POLE
PROPOSED SIGN
PROPOSED YARD DRAIN
OE PROPOSED OVERHEAD ELECTRIC
UE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC
COM PROPOSED COMMUNICATIONS
UNMARKED ANGLE POINT
PROPOSED EASEMENT LINE
DSM
DSM
SAL
1" = 40'
24110
C2.0
MAR., 2024
LOCATION MAP
1" = 2000'
WGM ASSOCIATES
c/o KEITH WRIGHT
P.O. BOX 2352
SOUTH BURLINGTON
VERMONT 05407
7-LOT
SUBDIVISION
PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS
PLAN
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
P: 802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
116
89PROJECT
LOCATION
NOTE: NO SHRUBBERY SHALL BE ERECTED, MAINTAINED, OR PLANTED ON
ANY LOT THAT OBSTRUCTS OF INTERFERES WITH TRAFFIC
VISIBILITY, IN THE CASE OF CORNER LOTS, SUCH RESTRICTED
AREA SHALL BE THE TRIANGULAR AREA FORMED BY THE LOT
LINES ALONG THE STREETS AND A LINE CONNECTING THEM AT
POINTS TWENTY-FIVE (25) FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION.
3.18 Residential and Commercial Building Energy Standards
A.Applicability.
This section shall apply to the receipt of a zoning permit for the construction and subsequent alteration of all new principal buildings
B.Residential Building Energy Standards (RBES). Residential buildings, as defined by 30 V.S.A. section 51(a)(2), that are a
principal building, shall comply with the RBES Stretch Code, as defined by 30 V.S.A. section 53)a). Such buildings for which the
RBES Certificate certifying compliance with the Stretch Code is not recorded in the South Burlington Land Records shall be deemed
land development without a zoning permit in violation of these Regulations.
896, 900 & 950
HINESBURG RD.
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT
8/21/24 DSM REVISED PER CITY REVIEW
10/7/24 DSM REVISED PER CITY REVIEW
P:\
A
u
t
o
C
A
D
D
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
0
2
4
\
2
4
1
1
0
-
W
G
M
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
\
1
-
C
A
D
D
F
i
l
e
s
\
d
w
g
\
2
4
1
1
0
-
S
i
t
e
.
d
w
g
,
1
0
/
8
/
2
0
2
4
6
:
2
5
:
3
6
A
M
38
0
SHED
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
HOUSE
(#950)
S
GARAGE
GARAGE
(#896)
SHED
HOUSE
(#900)
HOUSE
(#896)
SHED
SILO
(898)
EL. EASE. 10' FROM PL
PROBABLE GAS &
WATER EASEMENTS
40' FROM PL
20' SEWER EASEMENT
725.79' N 83°09'1
5
"
E
59
8
.
9
4
'
S
0
4
°
5
0
'
1
1
"
E
S 83°07'45" W
727.48'
N
0
5
°
5
3
'
2
1
"
W
4
2
0
.
7
2
'
17
8
.
9
1
'
N
0
1
°
4
9
'
1
2
"
W
SHED
W
?
DE
C
K
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
S
S
S
385
38
5
38
5
3
8
5
390
39
0
39
0
3
9
0
39
5
39
5
39
5
39
5
380
3
8
0
38
0
41
5
41
5
41
5
4
0
0
40
0
40
0
40
0
4
2
0
420
420
42
0
42
0
41
0
41
0
41
0
41
0
4
0
5
40
5
40
5
37
5
3
7
5
375
37
5
37
5
370
37
0
37
0
37
0
365
365
PRESUMED WETLAND (AS
SHOWN ON PREVIOUS
LANE PRESS PLANS)
SS
SS
S
S
HI
N
E
S
B
U
R
G
R
O
A
D
O
E
O
E
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
S
S
S
S
S
S
W
S
S
S
0+00 1+00 2+00
3+00
4+00
5+00
6+00
6+59.96
50'
WETL
A
N
D
BUFFE
R
50' WETLA
N
D
BUFFER
40
0
40
5410
39
5
39
0
38
5
380
37
9
S
S
S
37
7
37
6
37
4
LEVEL SPREADER
TOP AT EL. 373.5
PRETREATMENT
FOREBAY
(N.W.S. 376.0)
GRAVEL WETLAND
SURFACE EL. 375.0
STONE SPILLWAY
EL. 376.0
15" F.E.S.
INV. 373.5
15" F.E.S.
INV. 376.0
37
5
37
6
OUTLET CONTROL
STRUCTURE
RIM 377.0
INV. 372.2 (6" W)
INV. 374.5 (15" E)
F.F. 408.0
F.F. 396.0
F.F. 384.0
S
GR
A
D
E
T
O
D
R
A
I
N
15" HDPE
INV. 379.5
37
8 37
8
37
8
MAXINE'S WAY
37
7
37
7
TOP OF BERM
EL. 378.0
EMERGENCY
OVERFLOW
EL. 377.5
TOP OF BERM
EL. 378.0
S
S
LOT 1A
0.26 ACRES
LOT 1B
1.03 ACRES
LOT 1C
0.43 ACRES LOT 1D
0.57 ACRES
LOT 2
2.64 ACRES
LOT 3
3.02 ACRES
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
F.F. 380.0
S
S
S
S
LOT 4
1.00 ACRE
MAXINE'S WAY
F.F. 418.0±
W
W
W
W
W W W
W
WW
ALL ROOF DRAINS TO
SURFACE DISCHARGE
AND BE DIRECTED IN A
SOUTHRLY DIRECTION
TOWARDS ROADSIDE
DRAINAGE SWALE (TYP.)
G
R
A
D
E
T
O
D
R
A
I
N
G
R
A
D
E
T
O
D
R
A
I
N
G
R
A
D
E
T
O
D
R
A
I
N
37
8
STONE DIAPHRAGM
ALONG WEST SIDE
OF HAMMERHEAD
15" HDPE
INV. 396.515" HDPE
INV. 398.5
15" HDPE
INV. 386.2515" HDPE
INV. 388.0
15" HDPE
INV. 379.0
15" HDPE
INV. 377.25
STONE LINED
SWALE (TYP.)LOT 1E
0.09 ACRES
R.O.W.
1.01 ACRES
WATER DISTRIBUTION
FLOW CONTROL VALVE
DSM
DSM
SAL
1" = 40'
24110
C2.1
MAR., 2024
LOCATION MAP
1" = 2000'
WGM ASSOCIATES
c/o KEITH WRIGHT
P.O. BOX 2352
SOUTH BURLINGTON
VERMONT 05407
7-LOT
SUBDIVISION
PROPOSED
GRADING AND
DRAINAGE PLAN
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
P: 802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
116
89PROJECT
LOCATION
896, 900 & 950
HINESBURG RD.
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT
7/1/24 DSM REVISED WATER MAIN
7/29/24 MCK STORM WATER REVISIONS
8/21/24 DSM REVISED PER CITY REVIEW
10/7/24 DSM REVISED PER CITY REVIEW
P:\
A
u
t
o
C
A
D
D
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
0
2
4
\
2
4
1
1
0
-
W
G
M
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
\
1
-
C
A
D
D
F
i
l
e
s
\
d
w
g
\
2
4
1
1
0
-
S
i
t
e
.
d
w
g
,
1
0
/
8
/
2
0
2
4
8
:
1
0
:
3
2
A
M
3
8
0
SHED
POOL
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
ELEC. METER
ON BOARD
HOUSE
(#950)
S
ELEC. METER
GAS REGULATOR
PROPANE
TANKS
GARAGE
COMM BOX
APPROX. LOCATION OF
EXIST. SEPTIC SYSTEM
APPROX. LOCATION OF
EXIST. SEPTIC SYSTEM
APPROX. LOCATION OF
EXIST. SEPTIC SYSTEM
A/C
ELEC. METER
A/C
PROPANE TANK
GARAGE
(#896)
SHED
HOUSE
(#900)
HOUSE
(#896)
SHED
SILO
(898)
ELEC. METER
ELEC. METER
PROPANE TANK
EXIST. SOLAR PA
N
E
L
S
EL. EASE. 10' FROM PL
PROBABLE GAS &
WATER EASEMENTS
40' FROM PL
20' SEWER EASEMENT
725.79' N 83°09'1
5
"
E
59
8
.
9
4
'
S
0
4
°
5
0
'
1
1
"
E
S 83°07'45" W
727.48'
N
0
5
°
5
3
'
2
1
"
W
4
2
0
.
7
2
'
17
8
.
9
1
'
N
0
1
°
4
9
'
1
2
"
W
OIL FILL
GAS REGULATORGAS REGULATOR
OIL FILL
ELEC. METER
ELEC. PANEL
UTIL. CABINET
SHED
A/C
FUEL PUMPS (3)
OIL FILL
GAS VALVE
WATER VALVE
BLUE PAINT
COMM. VAULT
WATER VALVE
WATER
PIPELINE
MARKER
MANHOLE (BLUE)
BLUE PAINT
W
?
DE
C
K
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
COMM. VAULT
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
S
S
S
385
38
5
38
5
38
5
390
39
0
39
0
39
0
39
5
39
5
39
5
39
5
380
38
0
38
0
41
5
41
5
41
5
4
0
0
40
0
40
0
40
0
42
0
420
420
42
0
42
0
41
0
4
1
0
41
0
41
0
4
0
5
40
5
40
5
37
5
3
7
5
375
37
5
37
5
370
37
0
37
0
37
0
365
365
PRESUMED WETLAND (AS
SHOWN ON PREVIOUS
LANE PRESS PLANS)
SS
SS
S
S
HI
N
E
S
B
U
R
G
R
O
A
D
O
E
O
E
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
GAS
REGULATOR
S
S
S
S
S
S
W
S
S
S
C.O.C.O.
C.O.
C.O.
C.O.
SMH #3
RIM 411.4
INV. IN. 403.9
INV. IN. 403.9
INV. OUT 403.7
0+00 1+00 2+00
3+00
4+00
5+00
6+00
6+59.96
EX. SMH
RIM 372.4
INV. 364.0 (8" NW)
INV. 363.9 (8" N)
INV. 363.8 (8" S)
4" SDR 35 PVC (MIN.
2% SLOPE)
4" SDR 35 PVC (MIN.
2% SLOPE)
C.O.
C.O.
C.O.
C.O.
1.5" HDPE OR CTS
FROM CURB STOP
TO HOUSE. 1.5"
TYPE 'K' COPPER
FROM SERVICE
LINE TO CURB
STOP (TYP.)
4" SDR 35 PVC
(MIN. 2% SLOPE)
(TYP.)
50'
WETL
A
N
D
BUFF
E
R
50' WETL
A
N
D
BUFFER
40
0
40
5410
39
5
39
0
38
5
380
EX. SMH
RIM 370.2±
INV. 358.4
INV. 358.3
EX. SMH
RIM 373.2±
INV.
37
9
S
S
C.O.
C.O.
INV. 405.9
2" RIGID INSULATION BOARD
INV. 418.0
INV. 416.6
INV. 408.0
INV. 407.6
2" RIGID
INSULATION
BOARD
C.O.C.O.S
37
7
37
6
37
4
37
5
37
6
MAINTAIN 18" VERTICAL
SEPARATION AT ALL
WATER/SEWER
CROSSINGS (TYP.)
INV. 401.0
INV. 389.0
INV. 380.0
F.F. 408.0
F.F. 396.0
F.F. 384.0
S
2" RIGID
INSULATION
BOARD
37
8 37
8
37
8
37
7
37
7
S
S
SMH #1
RIM 377.2
INV. IN. 368.0
INV. OUT 367.9
ALL NEW BUILDINGS SHALL
BE OUTFITTED WITH TYPE 13D
SPRINKLER SYSTEMS
112" WET TAP OF EXISTING
12" D.I. WATER MAIN
SMH #2
RIM 392.5
INV. IN. 385.1
INV. OUT 385.0
SMH #2
RIM 380.2
INV. IN. 373.3
INV. OUT 373.2
1.5" CONNECTION TO 2"
BLOW-OFF ASSEMBLY
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
C.O.
INV. 376.0
F.F. 380.0
S
S
S
S
VALVE TO BE LOCATED
OUTSIDE OF R.O.W.
INV. 405.0
INV. 409.0
INV. 410.5INV. 417.0
INV. 407.9
INV. 410.0
INV. 408.7
INV. 413.5
INV. 405.9
2" RIGID
INSULATION
BOARD
71 L.F. - 8" SDR 35
PVC (S=5.5%)
96 L.F. - 8" SDR 35
PVC (S=5.4%)
F.F. 418.0±
W
W
W
W
W W W
W
WW
37
8
172 L.F. - 8" SD
R
3
5
P
V
C
(
S
=
6
.
8
%
)
186 L.F. - 8" SD
R
3
5
P
V
C
(
S
=
1
0
.
0
%
)
FUTURE SEWER
SERVICE (TYP.)
S
S
S
S
FUTURE SEWER MAIN
FUTURE 20' WIDE SEWER EASEMENT
1" IRRIGATION WATER
CONNECTION WITH
YARD HYDRANT
WATER DISTRIBUTION
FLOW CONTROL VALVE
112" TYPE 'K' COPPER
7/1/24 DSM REVISED WATER MAIN
DSM
DSM
SAL
1" = 40'
24110
C2.2
MAR., 2024
LOCATION MAP
1" = 2000'
WGM ASSOCIATES
c/o KEITH WRIGHT
P.O. BOX 2352
SOUTH BURLINGTON
VERMONT 05407
7-LOT
SUBDIVISION
PROPOSED
UTILITY PLAN
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
P: 802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
116
89PROJECT
LOCATIONLOT 4
1.00 ACRES
LOT 1D
0.57 ACRESLOT 1C
0.43 ACRES
LOT 1B
1.03 ACRES
LOT 1A
0.26 ACRES
LOT 2
2.64 ACRES
LOT 3
3.02 ACRES
896, 900 & 950
HINESBURG RD.
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT
7/29/24 MCK STORM WATER REVISIONS
8/21/24 DSM REVISED PER CITY REVIEW
R.O.W.
1.01 ACRES
LOT 1E
0.09 ACRES
10/7/24 DSM REVISED PER CITY REVIEW
P:\
A
u
t
o
C
A
D
D
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
0
2
4
\
2
4
1
1
0
-
W
G
M
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
\
1
-
C
A
D
D
F
i
l
e
s
\
d
w
g
\
2
4
1
1
0
-
S
i
t
e
.
d
w
g
,
1
0
/
8
/
2
0
2
4
8
:
1
0
:
0
7
A
M
3
8
0
SHED
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
HOUSE
(#950)
S
GARAGE
GARAGE
(#896)
SHED
HOUSE
(#900)
HOUSE
(#896)
SHED
SILO
(898)
SHED
W
?
DE
C
K
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
S
S
S
385
38
5
38
5
38
5
390
39
0
39
0
39
0
39
5
39
5
39
5
39
5
380
38
0
38
0
41
5
41
5
41
5
4
0
0
40
0
40
0
40
0
42
0
420
420
42
0
42
0
41
0
4
1
0
41
0
41
0
4
0
5
40
5
40
5
37
5
3
7
5
375
37
5
37
5
370
37
0
37
0
37
0
365
365
PRESUMED WETLAND (AS
SHOWN ON PREVIOUS
LANE PRESS PLANS)
SS
SS
S
S
HI
N
E
S
B
U
R
G
R
O
A
D
O
E
O
E
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
OE
S
S
S
S
S
S
W
S
S
S
50'
WETL
A
N
D
BUFF
E
R
50' WETL
A
N
D
BUFFER
40
0
40
5410
39
5
39
0
38
5
380
37
9
S
S
S
37
7
37
6
37
4
37
5
37
6
F.F. 408.0
F.F. 396.0
F.F. 384.0
S
37
8 37
8
37
8
37
7
37
7
S
S
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
TO BE PLACED IN SWALES AND
HIGHLIGHTED AREAS (TYP.)
INLET PROTECTION
(TYP.)
STABILIZED
CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
REINFORCED SILT FENCE
ALONG 50' WETLAND
BUFFER (TYP.)
SILT FENCE (TYP.)
SILT FENCE (TYP.)
SILT FENCE (TYP.)
ORANGE CONSTRUCTION
LIMITS TAPE (TYP.)
3' TALL CONSTRUCTION
FENCING REQUIRED
ALONG 50' WETLAND
SETBACK (TYP.)
ORANGE CONSTRUCTION
LIMITS TAPE (TYP.)
F.F. 380.0
S
S
S
S
PLACE EPSC MEASURES PER
DETAILS ON SHT. C3.2 (TYP.)
SHAPE AND USE AS A TEMP.
SEDIMENT BASIN UNTIL THE
SITE IS STABILIZED AND
THEN CONSTRUCT THE
GRAVEL WETLAND
F.F. 418.0±
PERMANENT STABILIZATION -
4" LOAM, SEED AND EROSION
CONTROL MATTING ON ALL
DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.)
W
W
W
W
W W W
W
WW
37
8
WATER DISTRIBUTION
FLOW CONTROL VALVE
DSM
DSM
SAL
1" = 40'
24110
C3.0
MAR., 2024
LOCATION MAP
1" = 2000'
WGM ASSOCIATES
c/o KEITH WRIGHT
P.O. BOX 2352
SOUTH BURLINGTON
VERMONT 05407
7-LOT
SUBDIVISION
EPSC PLAN
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
P: 802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
116
89PROJECT
LOCATION
896, 900 & 950
HINESBURG RD.
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT
8/21/24 DSM REVISED PER CITY REVIEW
10/7/24 DSM REVISED PER CITY REVIEW
P:\
A
u
t
o
C
A
D
D
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
0
2
4
\
2
4
1
1
0
-
W
G
M
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
\
1
-
C
A
D
D
F
i
l
e
s
\
d
w
g
\
2
4
1
1
0
-
S
i
t
e
.
d
w
g
,
1
0
/
8
/
2
0
2
4
8
:
1
1
:
0
0
A
M
SHED
HOUSE
(#950)
GARAGE
CEDAR HEDGE R
O
W
(
1
0
"
-
1
4
"
)
GARAGE
(#896)
SHED
HOUSE
(#900)
HOUSE
(#896)
SHED
SILO
(898)
CE
D
A
R
H
E
D
G
E
R
O
W
SHED
W
?
DE
C
K
HI
N
E
S
B
U
R
G
R
O
A
D
50'
WETL
A
N
D
BUFF
E
R
50' WETL
A
N
D
BUFFER
MAXINE'S WAY
SEE SHRUBBERY
NOTE BELOW
SEE SHRUBBERY
NOTE BELOW
CEDAR HEDGE (9"-1
5
"
)
(5) SPRUCE (12"x1
6
"
)
CEDAR HEDGE
10" SPRUCE
9" FLOWERING CRAB
14" MAPLE
8" MAPLE
17" ASH10" MAPLE
20" SPRUCE
4" MAPLE12" CEDAR 5" MAPLE
19" LOCUST
12" CRAB APPLE
22" ASH
26" SPRUCE
39" MAPLE
18" LOCUST
10" LOCUST
9" OAK
15" LOCUST
10" LOCUST
13" OAK
33" ELM
LOCUST
MAPLE
CEDAR
40" MAPLE
10" LOCUST
7" CRAB APPLE
12" SPRUCE
(6) CEDAR
MAPLE
ALDER
ALDER
LOCUST
BALSAM
BALSAMBALSAM
BALSAM
CEDAR HEDGE R
O
W
MAPLE MAPLE
MAPLE MAPLE
MAPLE
MAPLE
BALSAM
BALSAM
BALSAM
ASH
ASH
MAPLE
MAPLE
MAPLE
MAPLE
CRAB APPLE
CRAB APPLE
CRAB APPLE
ALDER
ALDER
ALDER
CEDAR HEDGE (7"-9")
CE
D
A
R
H
E
D
G
E
(
7
"
-
9
"
)
AMENITY AREA
(100 S.F.)
AMENITY AREA
(100 S.F.)
AMENITY AREA
(100 S.F.)
AMENITY AREA
(100 S.F.)
AMENITY AREA
(100 S.F.)
AMENITY AREA
(100 S.F.)
MAXINE'S WAY
STONE LINED
SWALE (TYP.)
NEW ROAD SURFACE
ASSUMED LIMITS
OF TRAVEL WAY
OF 'MAXINE'S WAY'FMSM
RM
SM
FM
SM
RM
FMSM
RM
SM
FM
SM
RM
WATER DISTRIBUTION
FLOW CONTROL VALVE
DSM
DSM
SAL
1" = 40'
24110
L1.0
MAR., 2024
LOCATION MAP
1" = 2000'
WGM ASSOCIATES
c/o KEITH WRIGHT
P.O. BOX 2352
SOUTH BURLINGTON
VERMONT 05407
7-LOT
SUBDIVISION
LANDSCAPE PLAN
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
P: 802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
116
89PROJECT
LOCATION
NOTE: NO SHRUBBERY SHALL BE ERECTED, MAINTAINED, OR PLANTED ON
ANY LOT THAT OBSTRUCTS OF INTERFERES WITH TRAFFIC
VISIBILITY, IN THE CASE OF CORNER LOTS, SUCH RESTRICTED
AREA SHALL BE THE TRIANGULAR AREA FORMED BY THE LOT
LINES ALONG THE STREETS AND A LINE CONNECTING THEM AT
POINTS TWENTY-FIVE (25) FEET FROM THE INTERSECTION.
LOT 4
1.00 ACRES
LOT 1D
0.57 ACRES
LOT 1C
0.43 ACRES
LOT 1B
1.03 ACRES
LOT 1A
0.26 ACRES
LOT 2
2.64 ACRES
LOT 3
3.02 ACRES
896, 900 & 950
HINESBURG RD.
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT
DET-L005
N.T.S.
TREE PLANTING DETAIL
REVISED 02/18/2015DE
T
-
L
0
0
5
T
r
e
e
P
l
a
n
i
n
g
PLANTING NOTES:
1.EXCAVATE A PIT WHICH IS AT LEAST TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOTBALL AND
SAME DEPTH - NO DEEPER.
2.REMOVE ALL STRING &/OR WIRE WRAPPED AROUND TRUNK.
3.REMOVE ALL STRAPS, ROPES, WIRE, &/OR STRINGS USED TO LIFT THE ROOTBALL.
4.REMOVE ALL BURLAP &/OR WIRE FROM THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL.
5.TOP OF ROOTBALL TO BE SET FLUSH WITH FINISH GRADE.
2 - 2"x4" STAKE W/
LONG TAPER MIN.
18" INTO
UNDISTURBED SOIL
UNDISTURBED SOIL
TILLED AND LOOSENED
NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL
MULCH 3" DEPTH
DO NOT TOUCH THE ROOT
FLARE OF THE TREE
CREATE A SOIL SAUCER
WITH TOPSOIL
ROOTBALL
TILLED AND LOOSENED
NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL
STAKE
2 TIMES THE WIDTH
OF THE ROOTBALL
SizeScientific Name Common NameKey Condition
P L A N T L I S T
Acer saccharum Sugar MapleSM B & B
Acer rubrum Red MapleRM B & B
Acer x freemanil Freeman MapleFM B & B2.5"-3" Cal.
2.5"-3" Cal.
2.5"-3" Cal.
Qty
6
4
4
8/21/24 DSM REVISED PER CITY REVIEW
10/7/24 DSM REVISED PER CITY REVIEW
P:\
A
u
t
o
C
A
D
D
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
0
2
4
\
2
4
1
1
0
-
W
G
M
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
\
1
-
C
A
D
D
F
i
l
e
s
\
d
w
g
\
2
4
1
1
0
-
S
i
t
e
.
d
w
g
,
1
0
/
8
/
2
0
2
4
6
:
2
9
:
0
8
A
M
SHED
HOUSE
(#950)
GARAGE
CEDAR HEDGE RO
W
(
1
0
"
-
1
4
"
)
GARAGE
(#896)
SHED
HOUSE
(#900)
HOUSE
(#896)
SHED
SILO
(898)SHED
W
?
DE
C
K
HI
N
E
S
B
U
R
G
R
O
A
D
CEDAR HEDGE (9"-1
5
"
)
(5) SPRUCE (12"x1
6
"
)
10" SPRUCE
9" FLOWERING CRAB
14" MAPLE
8" MAPLE
17" ASH10" MAPLE
20" SPRUCE
4" MAPLE12" CEDAR 5" MAPLE
19" LOCUST
12" CRAB APPLE
22" ASH
26" SPRUCE
39" MAPLE
18" LOCUST
10" LOCUST
9" OAK
15" LOCUST
10" LOCUST
13" OAK
33" ELM
LOCUST
MAPLE
CEDAR
40" MAPLE
10" LOCUST
7" CRAB APPLE
12" SPRUCE
(6) CEDAR
MAPLE
ALDER
ALDER
LOCUST
BALSAM
BALSAMBALSAM
BALSAM
MAPLE MAPLE
MAPLE MAPLE
MAPLE
MAPLE
BALSAM
BALSAM
BALSAM
ASH
ASH
MAPLE
MAPLE
MAPLE
MAPLE
CRAB APPLE
CRAB APPLE
CRAB APPLE
ALDER
ALDER
ALDER
CEDAR HEDGE (7"-9")
CE
D
A
R
H
E
D
G
E
(
7
"
-
9
"
)
WATER DISTRIBUTION
FLOW CONTROL VALVE
DSM
DSM
SAL
1" = 40'
24110
L1.1
MAR., 2024
LOCATION MAP
1" = 2000'
WGM ASSOCIATES
c/o KEITH WRIGHT
P.O. BOX 2352
SOUTH BURLINGTON
VERMONT 05407
7-LOT
SUBDIVISION
TREE
PRESERVATION
PLAN
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
P: 802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
116
89PROJECT
LOCATION
Tree Protection and Retention Specification for Construction Site
1.Purpose:
The purpose of this specification is to establish guidelines and procedures for the protection and retention of the
existing trees to be retained within the construction site. The goal is to minimize potential damage to trees during
construction activities and ensure their long-term viability.
2.Scope:
This specification applies to all existing trees located within the construction site boundaries that are called for to be
retained. It covers activities from site preparation to project completion.
3.Pre-Construction Assessment:
a.Conduct a thorough inventory of existing trees, including species, size, health, and location.
b.Engage a certified arborist to assess the health and condition of the trees.
c.Identify and mark the Critical Root Zone (CRZ) for each tree, considering factors such as tree species, size, and soil
type. See the detail on this sheet for additional guidance.
d.Before any grading, demolition, or other disturbance, including tree removal, a pre-construction meeting shall be
held with City Arborist. Changes to the plan, based on field conditions, may be requested by the City Arborist at the
time of the pre-construction meeting.
4.Tree Protection Zone (TPZ):
a.Establish a Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) for each tree based on the CRZ.
b.Clearly demarcate TPZ boundaries using visible fencing or barricades.
5.Construction Activity Guidelines:
a.Tree protection shall be installed per plan, with any changes requested at the pre-construction meeting, and
inspected by a privately retained certified arborist.
b.No changes shall be made to tree conservation or proposed landscape unless directed or approved by the City
Arborist or privately retained certified arborist.
c.Prohibit any construction activity within the TPZ of protected trees.
d.Implement measures to prevent soil compaction, grade changes, or material storage within the TPZ.
e.Minimize vehicular and equipment traffic near trees, using designated pathways.
f.Limit excavation depth within the TPZ to avoid damage to the tree's root system.
g.Follow ANSI standards when pruning trees. Any pruning beyond 5% of the canopy shall be communicated to the
City Arborist
h.Removal of trees, noted for removal on the plan, inside a tree preservation area shall be performed, by hand,
without ground disturbance, or disturbance to nearby preserved trees. Trees in these areas shall be cut flush to the
ground, without stump grinding.
6.Mulching and Irrigation:
a.Apply a layer of organic mulch within the TPZ to conserve soil moisture and regulate temperature.
b.Implement a watering schedule during dry periods to ensure adequate moisture for tree health.
7.Root Pruning:
a.Prohibit root pruning without prior approval from the certified arborist.
b.If root pruning is necessary, ensure it is performed by qualified professionals following arboricultural best practices.
8.Monitoring and Reporting:
a.At the end of the project, conserved and planted trees must be inspected and approved by the City Arborist.
b.Conduct regular inspections of protected trees and TPZs.
c.Document any changes in tree health, signs of stress, or damage.
d.Report findings to the project manager and the certified arborist promptly.
9.Emergency Measures:
a.Establish emergency procedures in case of unforeseen events threatening tree health.
b.Designate responsible personnel to implement emergency measures as needed.
10.Post-Construction Care:
a.Implement a post-construction care plan, including additional mulching, fertilization, and any necessary tree
maintenance.
b.Conduct a final inspection to ensure the long-term health and stability of retained trees.
11.Compliance:
a.Ensure that all contractors, subcontractors, and project personnel are informed of and comply with this
specification.
b.Non-compliance may result in penalties and corrective actions as determined by the City of South Burlington.
TREE PRESERVATION PLAN- TREE PRESERVATION
LOT 1B
1.03 ACRES
LOT 1A
0.26 ACRES
LOT 2
2.64 ACRES
LOT 3
3.02 ACRES
896, 900 & 950
HINESBURG RD.
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT
LOT 1C
0.43 ACRES
8/21/24 DSM REVISED PER CITY REVIEW
10/7/24 DSM REVISED PER CITY REVIEW
P:\
A
u
t
o
C
A
D
D
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
0
2
4
\
2
4
1
1
0
-
W
G
M
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
\
1
-
C
A
D
D
F
i
l
e
s
\
d
w
g
\
2
4
1
1
0
-
S
i
t
e
.
d
w
g
,
1
0
/
7
/
2
0
2
4
1
1
:
5
0
:
3
6
A
M
SHED
POOL
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
HOUSE
950
S
GARAGE
HEDGE ROW
APPROX. LOCATION
OF SEPTIC SYSTEM
APPROX. LOCATION
EXIST. WW SYSTEM
A/
C
GARAGE
SHED
HOUSE
900
HOUSE
896
SHED
SILO
HEDGE ROW
SOLAR PANELS
HED
G
E
R
O
W
EXIST EL. & COMM. EASE.
10' FROM PL Vol. 176 Pg. 138
EXIST. GAS & WATER
EASEMENTS 40' FROM PL
(NOT ON SURVEYED PROPERTY)
EXIST. 20'
SEWER EASEMENT
N 83°09'15" E 725
.
7
9
'
T
o
t
a
l
S 83°07'45" W 7
2
7
.
4
8
'
LOT 1A
0.26
ACRES LOT 1B
1.08 ACRES
LOT 1C
0.47 ACRES
LOT 1D
0.61 ACRES
LO
T
4
C
O
M
M
O
N
L
A
N
D
1.
0
0
A
C
R
E
S
LOT 2
2.73 ACRES
LOT 3
3.02 ACRES
73.05'
13
1
.
8
2
'
V
T
.
R
O
U
T
E
1
1
6
HI
N
E
S
B
U
R
G
R
O
A
D
800 Hinesburg Rd.
n/f Waterloo Real Estate Group, LLC
Vol. 1599 Pg. 02
"DR Power Equip."
n/f
835 Hinesburg
Road, LLC
Vol. 468 Pg. 691
87 Meadowland Dr.
n/f Landrum
Vol. 218 Pg. 514
"Lane Press"
85 Meadowland Dr.
n/f Burlington Properties Ltd.
Vol. 514 Pg. 272
"Dynapower"
850, 900, 950 Hinesburg Rd.
WGM Associates
Vol. 655 Pg.16
Vol. 675 Pg. 550
10.05± Acres Total
87 Meadowland Dr.
n/f Landrum
PROPOSED WIDENING OF
HINESBURG RD. R.O.W. BY 7' &
PROPOSED 20' WIDE REC. EASE.
(LINE SHOWN AT 27')
TO
T
I
L
L
E
Y
D
R
I
V
E
-
>
TO
M
E
A
D
O
W
L
A
N
D
D
R
I
V
E
-
>
RW 5 RW 6
RW 14
RW 17
654.44'
N 78°00'16"
E
294.73'
S
0
4
°
5
0
'
1
1
"
E
22
3
.
5
3
'
N 88°21'58" E
89.33'
N 85°26'48" E
51.16'
N 80°46'30" E
225.54'
S53°
2
3
'
5
3
"
W
86.3
8
'
S 87°19'33" W
34.49'
S 01°49'12" E
7.09'
S
0
5
°
5
3
'
2
1
"
E
2
2
2
.
6
7
'
N 01°49'12" W
40.00'
N01°36'27"W
34.14'
N 54°57'00" E
18.58'
N 03°54'08" W
95.03'
115.00'
86.67'
S
0
1
°
4
9
'
1
2
"
E
167.69'
N 83°09'15" E
1141.5' to CMF ->
17
0
.
2
5
'
N
0
4
°
4
5
'
3
9
"
W
RW2RW1
RW 19
RW 18
MAXINE'S WAY
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
0
4
°
5
0
'
1
1
"
E
5
9
8
.
9
4
'
SS
SS
S
S
S
S
S
RW 7 RW 8
RW 11RW 12
RW 13
SH
E
D
S
0
4
°
5
0
'
1
1
"
E
12
1
.
0
2
'
2
0
.
0
4
'
N
0
4
°
5
0
'
1
1
"
W
11
4
.
1
7
'
S
0
6
°
4
9
'
1
8
"
E
19
4
.
9
1
'
S
0
6
°
4
9
'
1
8
"
E
19
8
.
1
8
'
74.13'
N88°05'01"E
81.40'
CMF
0.3' BG
CMF
0.4' AG
CMP
CMF
Flush
EXIST. GRAVEL EDGES
EXIST. GRAVEL AREA
EX
I
S
T
.
G
R
A
V
.
D
R
.
RW 3
RW 4
RW 16
RW 15
RW 10
15
'
15
'
40'
n/f
Landrum
S
S
S
E1
E10
E1
E2
E3
E5
E6
E4
E4
E7
E8
E7
E9
E9
N
4
6
°
2
9
'
2
9
"
W
8
3
.
6
5
'
ACCESS
SEWER
ACCESS
WATER
ACCESS
SEWER
SEWER
EL / COM
EL / COM
WATER TEMPORARY
TURNAROUND
SEWER
SEWER
ACCESS
40' WIDE R.O.W.
SEWER
283.38'
N0
4
°
5
0
'
1
1
"
W
70
.
8
2
'
CMF
S
51
.
9
3
'
49
.
3
8
'
40'
40.06'
MA
X
I
N
E
'
S
W
A
Y
PR
I
V
A
T
E
N
0
5
°
5
3
'
2
1
"
W
1
9
8
.
0
5
'
FUTURE WIDENING
OF HWY. R.O.W. BY 7'
20' SETBACK FROM
FUTURE R.O.W.
FUTURE WIDENING OF
HIGHWAY R.O.W. BY 7'
20' SETBACK
FROM FUTURE R.O.W.
80'
20
'106'
40
'
73.04'
OE
OE
E7.1
SOLAR EQUIP.
S 88°05'01" W
E9
BLDG. ENV.
(TYPICAL)
BLDG. ENV.
(TYPICAL)
BLDG. ENV.
(TYPICAL)
BLDG. ENV.
(TYPICAL)
BLDG. ENV.
(TYPICAL)
E11
ACCESS
LOT 1E
0.14 ACRES
40' R.O.W.
0.70 ACRES
EXISTING EASEMENT TO BE
CONVERTED TO FUTURE 40' R.O.W.
PARCEL WITH THE SUBSEQUENT
DEVELOPMENT OF PHASE 2
XXX
TRC
CEA
1" = 50'
24110
P1
NOT to SCALE
A
C
E
WGM
ASSOCIATES
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
896, 900 & 950 Hinesburg Rd.
South Burlington, Vermont
MAY __, 2024
Plat of Survey
7-Lot Subdivision
RECEIVED FOR RECORDING IN THE LAND RECORDS OF THE CITY
OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, AT______________ O'CLOCK
ON THE ______ DAY OF __________, 20_____.
ATTEST: ____________________________, CITY CLERK
APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, ON
THE _____ DAY OF _____________, 20____, SUBJECT TO THE
REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION.
SIGNED THIS _____ DAY OF ______________, 20______.
BY ___________________________________, CHAIRPERSON
To the best of my knowledge and belief
this plat depicts the results of a survey
conducted by me as described in "Survey
Notes" above, based upon our analysis of
land records and evidence found in the
field. Existing boundaries shown are in
substantial conformance with the records,
except as noted. This plat is in substantial
compliance with 27 VSA 1403,
"Recording of Land Plats". This statement
valid only when accompanied by my
original signature and seal.
_______________________________
Timothy R. Cowan VT LS 597
- New Easement Notes -
E.1. New 40' Wide Access Easement across Lots 1A-1D and Lot 2 to serve City, Lots
1A-1D, Lots 2 - 4. (Includes T-shaped turn-around Lot 1D and Lot 2.)
E.2. New 20' Wide Access Easement across portions of Lot 1A and Lot 2, within
existing gravel drive to serve Lot 3.
E.3. New 30' Wide Shared Access Easement, centered on lot line, to serve Lots 2
and 3.
E.4. New 20' Wide Water Line Easement (SHADED) to serve Lots 1A - 1D, centered
on new water line as constructed.
E.5.New Sewer Line Easement to be centered on new sewer line as constructed, to
serve Lot 1A. (To be 20' wide except where restricted by property lines and/or
buildings.)
E.6. New 20' Wide Sewer Line Easement to be centered on new sewer line as
constructed, to serve Lot 3.
E.7. New Power & Communications Easement (SHADED) bound northerly by
existing northerly property line. (To be 20' wide except where restricted by
property lines and/or buildings.) To include Electrical Easement to/from existing
solar panels on Lots 1D and 4.
E.7.1. Extension easterly of 20' wide Easement E.7. for Access and Service to/from
existing solar panels, widening to 40' wide as shown surrounding panels.
E.8. New 10' Wide Sewer Easement on lands of Waterloo Real Estate Group to
serve Lot 1A.
E.9.New 20' Wide Sewer Easement, centered on new sewer line as constructed to
serve Lots 1A - 1D and Lot 3.
E.10 Temporary 40' wide easement for turnaround at SE corner of Lot 1D.
Dimensions as shown. Easement shall revert to Lot 1D upon extension of
Maxine's Way southerly and connecting with the Dynapower access road.
E.11 12' wide easement for service access to solar array.
PROGRESS PLANS
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
08/21/24
- Location Map -
NOT to SCALE
- Survey Notes -
1.Purpose of this survey is to retrace the boundaries of an existing parcel of land deeded to WGM
Associates by deed recorded in Volume 675 at Page 550 of the South Burlington Land Records.
Other neighboring property lines and buildings shown MAY be approximate only, and are shown
for information purposes only.
- Referenced Plats or Plans -
A. "Property Survey, Wright Farm, Hinesburg Rd., ... Owned by H. & B. Realty, Inc." dated
2/7/1979 by Engineers Incorporated of Vermont. Map Slide 150.1, South Burlington
Land Records (SBLR)
B. "Plat of Land of Semicon Components, Inc." dated 12/6/1981 and last revised
8/29/1986 by Trudell Consulting Engineers Inc. [TCE] Map Slide 193.1 of SBLR.
C. "ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey, Telephone Operating Company of Vermont, LLC ... 800
Hinesburg Road." dated 9/11/2014 by TCE. Not of Record.
D. "Site Plan, WRT - South Burlington Property LLC", last revised 2/10/2016 by TCE.
Not of Record.
E. "Proposed 4-Lot Subdivision, Burlington Properties, L.P." dated March 10, 2010 and last
revised Sept. 15, 2010 by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Map Slide 549.4, SBLR.
F. "Plat of Land of Mitel, Inc.", last revised 5/21/1984, by TCE. Map Slide 170.4, SBLR.
G. "Landrum and Orchard Lake Road Properties", last revised 2/03/1988, by TCE.
Map Slide 208.5, SBLR.
- Wright Lane R.O.W. -
116
89PROJECT
LOCATION
LINE BEARING DISTANCE
RW 2 - 3 N 88°05'01" E 115.53'
RW 4 -5 S 72°12'36" E 36.54'
RW 6 -7 N 81°31'24" E 320.88'
RW 7 - 8 N 81°31'24" E 40.06'
RW 8 - 10 S 04°50'11" E 20.04'
RW 11-12 S 85°09'49" W 40.00'
RW 12-13 N 04°50'11" W 48.24'
RW 13-14 S 81°31'24" W 318.33'
RW 15-16 N 72°12'36" W 36.54'
RW 17-18 S 88°05'01" W 108.33'
CURVE RADIUS ARC DELTA
RW 3-4 120.00'41.27'19°42'23"
RW 5-6 80.00'36.67'26°15'59"
RW 14-15 120.00'55.01'26°15'59"
RW 16-17 80.00'27.52'19°42'23"
E9
- Legend -
- Lease Agreement -
1.Facilities on and near the silo shown on on the southerly part of proposed
Lot 1A are or may be subject to a Lease Agreement made with
Independant Wireless One Leased Realty Corp., dated March 25, 2013
and recorded in Volume 1148 at Page 328. NOT PLOTTABLE.
2.Field survey was conducted during March 2024 with RTK GPS and electronic total station instrumentation.
Bearings shown are from Grid North, Vermont Coordinate System of 1983, based upon our GPS observations on
or adjacent to the site (Reference Frame NAD83 (2011, Epoch 2010)).
3. Concrete monuments shown as “found” are typically 4" x 4". Condition of markers found are “good” unless
otherwise noted. Corners denoted “Proposed” shall typically consist of 5/8” diameter rebar or 4" square concrete
monuments capped with aluminum disks stamped “CEA, Inc. - VT LS 597”, typically set flush with existing grade.
4. Hinesburg Road (VT. Route 116) is a public highway with a historical R.O.W. width of 4 rods (66'). Proposals
exist to widen the R.O.W. by 14' and require a 20' building setback therefrom, as shown.
5. Land areas shown for Lots 1A, 2 and 3 are to the existing sideline of Hinesburg Road (VT. Route 116.)
6. Not being within the scope of this survey, Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. has conducted no investigation
whatsoever respecting whether or not the property and each component thereof is in compliance with state or
local permits.
7. Utilities shown do not purport to constitute or represent all utilities located upon or adjacent to the surveyed
premises. Existing utility locations are approximate only. Buried utilities shown are depicted based solely on
surface indications. Actual locations may vary. Contact Dig Safe (888-344-7233) prior to any construction.
7/1/24 DSM REVISED E4
P:\
A
u
t
o
C
A
D
D
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
0
2
4
\
2
4
1
1
0
-
W
G
M
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
\
1
-
C
A
D
D
F
i
l
e
s
\
d
w
g
\
2
4
1
1
0
S
u
r
v
e
y
P
l
a
t
.
d
w
g
,
8
/
2
1
/
2
0
2
4
8
:
3
7
:
0
7
A
M