HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda 05_MP-24-03_850 Hinesburg Rd_WGM Assoc
180 Market Street, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 | 802-846-4106 | www.southburlingtonvt.gov
TO: South Burlington Development Review Board
FROM: Marla Keene, Development Review Planner
SUBJECT: #MP-24-03 850 Hinesburg Road
DATE: October 15, 2024 Development Review Board meeting
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Master plan application #MP-24-03 of WGM Associates to subdivide an existing approximately
10.0 acre lot developed with three homes and an existing non-conforming commercial or private
parking facility into ten single family home lots ranging from 0.26 acres to 2.05 acres, one single
family home lot with an existing non-conforming commercial or private parking facility on 1.52
acres, and one 1.0 acre civic space lot, 850 Hinesburg Road.
CONTEXT
The Board reviewed this application on September 4, 2024. The applicant also submitted revised
materials on October 8 consisting of a revised master plan phasing plan (sheet MP-1) and a revised
context plan (sheet MP-2).
This memorandum provides a summary of the revised materials. Where the Board indicated
satisfaction with a criterion on September 4, and no changes are proposed affecting compliance
with the criterion, the criterion is omitted from this memorandum.
The majority of outstanding comments on this master plan application and on the concurrent
Phase 1 preliminary plat application pertain to the proposed roadway and the proposed utilities,
and stem from interdepartmental review of the application. Staff considers the Board may elect to
keep the master plan hearing open until discussion of the concurrent site plan application is
complete, and close both applications in one motion.
COMMENTS
Development Review Planner Marla Keene and Director of Planning and Zoning Paul Conner,
hereafter referred to as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted by the applicant and offer the
following comments. Numbered comments for the Board’s attention are in red.
C) MASTER PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
15.B.04 Master Plan Components
(E) Development Plan. One or more maps and an accompanying narrative that depict and
describe the overall pattern, type, and density of development proposed for the entire project, and
for each phase of development, to include:
• The proposed street and block grid within and connecting each phase of development,
including the location of major streets by Street Type, and any existing rights-of-way,
easements or intersections identified for relocation;
The applicant is only proposing one street, and is proposing “Neighborhood Street –
Narrow” as the street type. This is the smallest permitted street type, the characteristics of
which are as follows.
• Description: Narrow Streets are a special residential street type within the local
street network that provides for greater intimacy and ambiance as well as traffic
calming because of its limited width. Its application should be targeted to areas
where through trips are undesirable or unlikely and where parallel alternative
routes are accessible
• 5-ft Sidewalk required on one side. Sidewalk may be integrated with the street on
dead-end streets.
• 6-ft greenbelt required on each side
• On-street parking is prohibited
• 2 drive lanes at 9 – 10 ft width with a total pavement width of 20 – 22 ft is required
(1-ft shoulders on each side)
• 40-ft right of way width
• Vertical faced curb required
Staff is generally supportive of the requested street type. At the sketch plan meeting, the
applicant indicated it was their desire to retain the road as private during Phase 1, but
would make provisions for the road to be converted to a public road during subsequent
phases of development. It was further clarified on September 4 that the applicant’s
proposal is to construct the road in Phase 1 as 20-ft wide without a separate sidewalk, and
in future phases pave the roadway and add a sidewalk. The Phase 1 and full build
conditions would include an open drainage system (swales and culverts).
Additional discussion of the requested modifications is included in concurrent preliminary
plat #SD-24-08.
• Proposed recreation paths, transit routes, infrastructure, and utility corridors between and
serving each phase of development;
Design of the road and water line are the most significant outstanding issues for this project,
and both are discussed here and in concurrent preliminary plat SD-24-08.
Based on feedback provided by the Departments of Public Works and Water, the applicant
has proposed to expand the right-of-way so that the water line is located within it. The
applicant has not shown the proposed sewer line on the master plan. Staff infers however
from the plans provided with concurrent Phase 1 preliminary plat application #SD-24-08 that
the applicant is proposing to locate the sewer line within the ROW except for a portion
(connecting to the municipal sewer) within the proposed civic space lot.
The Director of Public Works provided the following updated relevant comments on the
revised plans on October 15.
• As part of any future phase, entire road must be upgraded to meet current DPW
standards. This includes the existing section of road between Hinesburg Road and the
new portion of Maxine Way included in phase 1 as well as all roads constructed as part
of phase 1.
• The project shall be constructed in accordance with South Burlington Public Works
Standards and Specifications.
• I believe that an updated plat is on the way. I’d like to review the proposed future ROW
width and location. It is not clear based on the current plat which utilities and structures
are proposed to be located within the ROW. It should be clarified at what point the City
is being asked to accept wastewater infrastructure (smh#3 and to the east)?
Staff note: This comment is discussed below.
• The project proposes to eliminate the hammerhead turn around constructed as part of
phase 1 when the road is extended. Phase 2 must include a turnaround at it’s end.
Staff note: While Staff is generally supportive of this comment, Staff recommends the
Board word this condition slightly differently to require a hammerhead turn-around at
the end of Phase 2 if it does not connect to a road on the adjacent lot.
• The project must obtain drinking water and wastewater allocations for the additional
development.
• The "Neighborhood Street - Narrow" street typology does not accommodate on-street
parking. Applicant will need to provide street signage to this effect.
• The application should review the City's stormwater ordinance to ensure that policies
related to the future acceptance of stormwater infrastructure are clear.
Aside from as indicated in embedded Staff notes above, Staff recommends the Board
incorporate the comments of the Director of Public Works as conditions of approval.
The South Burlington Water Director reviewed the revised plans on October 11 and offers
the following updated comments.
1. There is a 1-1/2” water line proposed for Phase 1 of this project. That line shall be
disconnected from the Hinesburg Road water line when the new water main is installed.
Disconnection shall include closing the corporation, disconnecting the water line from
the corporation and wrapping the area of water main with V-Bio sleeve. Each existing
water service must also be connected to the proposed water main depicted in the
Master Plan.
2. The connection of the proposed new water main on the water line serving the Lane
Press and Dynapower will require approval from the owner prior to connection. A three-
way valve cluster will be required at the time of connection.
3. A permanent easement must be provided to the City for the water main installed
outside of the proposed street right-of-way, centered over the installed water main.
4. Prior to construction of the water main proposed for the Master Plan, the SBWD shall be
provided plans for further review and comment.
Comments of the Fire Marshal were provided on October 17 and are including in the
concurrent preliminary plat memorandum.
(F) Summary Statistics. The following project statistics or metrics, presented in an easy to
reference tabular format, must be provided for the entire tract or project area, and for each phase
of development, unless waived by the DRB as not relevant or applicable to a particular project:
It does not appear the applicant has updated the table of Summary Statistics on Sheet MP-
1 to reflect the revised future ROW width. Some of the statistics are unchanged, while many
should be updated. The following information should be provided.
• Total tract or parcel area, and the area associated with each phase of development, in acres
and square feet; for protection under Article 12, and by resource type (Hazard, Level I, Level
II); and the area, in acres, of any designated Conservation Area(s) or lots, as shown on the
Master Plan;
• Total area, in acres, included in existing and planned street rights-of-way; the number and
length in feet of proposed streets by Street Type, and the number of street intersections,
as shown on the Master Plan.
• Total number of existing and planned blocks; and the block perimeter and average block
length for each block, in feet, as shown on the Master Plan.
• Total Buildable Area, in acres and square feet, as allocated by land use or building type,
within each designated Development Area and block shown on the Master Plan, to exclude
existing and planned street rights-of-way, but to include existing and proposed civic space
lots and parking lots.
• Number of proposed dwelling units by housing or building type within each designated
Development Area and block shown on the Master Plan;
• Total gross floor area by use or building type for nonresidential and mixed use development
within each designated Development Area and block shown on the Master Plan; and
• Other statistics or data required by the DRB as necessary to determine conformance with
relevant standards under these Regulations.
Staff considers the master plan map graphically represents these statistics, and comments
affecting them are embedded within this report. If the project is ultimately approved, Staff
recommends the Board require the applicant to update the statistics on sheet MP-1 as a
condition of approval.
(G) Buildout Analysis and Budget. Based on the statistics provided under (F) above, the
applicant must also provide an analysis for each of the following based on total forecasted demand
at buildout, and as allocated for each phase of development, for use in determining the project’s
total “Buildout Budget”:
• Minimum and maximum acreage allocations by land use or building type, as percentages
of the Buildable Area within designated Development Areas;
Land use types are defined in 15.C.04D(4) as Residential, Mixed-Use, Civic Space, Resource
Land (consisting of protected natural resources and otherwise conserved areas), and
Unallocated. Street rights of way are excluded from buildable area altogether. The
applicant has provided the following totals. Staff has consolidated “right of way” into
“residential,” since roadways are defined to be included in the land use type they support.
Land Use Types
(acres) Phase 0 Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Total
Residential 3.54 2.21 1.93 0.76 8.44
Civic Spaces 0 1.0 0 0 1.0
Utility 0.13 0 0 0 0.13
Commercial 0.49 0 0 0 0.49
Unallocated 0 0 0 0 0
Staff comments pertaining to this land use table are unchanged from the initial
submission, and may be addressed as conditions of approval. Staff has replicated those
comments as follows for reference.
1. The applicant has not broken out the resource land. Since resource land (the wetland
buffer) is non-buildable, Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to update
the table to include it as a separate line item. Staff considers this can be a condition of
approval.
2. Rights of way are to be included in residential land use. Staff recommends the Board
require the applicant to update the table.
3. As an existing non-conformity that is permitted to remain, Staff recommends the Board
require the applicant to include the commercial parking facility as part of the
“residential” land use type. Staff considers this can be a condition of approval.
• Gross and net (or effective) development densities by land use or building type;
Development density within a General PUD is determined by maximum development
density in the underlying zoning district. As discussed above, the applicant is proposing to
take advantage of Act 47 which permits 5 units per acre to increase the base density above
what is permitted in the underlying zoning district. The applicant has proposed 1.2 units per
acre. However, Staff considers this may change when the building type mix is updated as
required above.
• Minimum number or percentage of affordable housing units required within residential and
mixed-use development areas, as applicable pursuant to Article 18;
The applicant on September 4 noted that 18.01B(2) requires provision of 10% inclusionary
units (assuming all units are ownership and not rental units) for all development that will
result in the creation of twelve or more total dwelling units through subdivision, Planned
Unit Development, new construction, or the conversion of an existing structure or structures
from non-residential to residential use, while this project only creates nine (9) new units
Staff has reviewed this interpretation and agrees.
• Minimum percentage, and area in square feet, of required civic space(s) within designated
Development Areas;
Since street rights of way are excluded from buildable area, the applicant must update the
buildable area computations. Staff considers this can be a condition of approval.
(H) Design Standards. The application must include proposed standards, specifications,
illustrations, best management practices, or other forms of guidance for the following, consistent
with City regulations in effect at the time of Master Plan approval, as applicable to all subsequent
development under the Master Plan:
The purpose of this section to evaluate the standards the applicant has set for themselves that will
ensure a cohesive design within the master plan area and that will apply to the entire Master Plan.
• Typical street cross-sections by Street Type, as referenced under Article 11.A;
The applicant has proposed a neighborhood narrow street type, which has a required ROW
width of 40-ft minimum. The applicant has requested relief from several elements of the
required cross-section for Phase 1. The applicant’s request for relief from the required cross
section for master plan extends only to the proposal for a ditch and culvert drainage system in
lieu of a curb and gutter system, with which request the Board indicated they had no concerns
at the September 4 hearing.
The applicant has proposed a ROW which varies in width from 44-ft for phase 2 and 52 to 63 ft
in phase 1. There is one section that is proposed to be curved on one side and straight lines on
the other.
1. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to update the plat and revise the ROW to
be more regularly and consistently shaped prior to closing the master plan.
(J) Management Plan. A narrative description of the proposed management structure
responsible for project development, to include all principals or entities with direct control over and
responsibility for the financing, permitting, construction, and completion of development under the
Master Plan; and, following project completion, for long-term ownership, management, operation,
and maintenance of capital and community assets.
The applicant has indicated that WGM Associates is the owner of the property. Following
completion, the management of the common infrastructure is proposed to be outlined in a
Homeowners Association Declaration and Covenants.
Because the project requires creation of a civic space lot, Staff recommends the Board require the
applicant to create the proposed HOA prior to recording the subdivision mylar for Phase 1.
The management plan must also clearly identify any streets, infrastructure, facilities, civic or other
open spaces proposed for public dedication under each phase of development, consistent with the
City’s adopted Official Map and Capital Improvement Plan, for consideration under subsequent DRB
reviews and conditions of approval or under development agreements to be approved by the City
Council.
2. The applicant must offer the road as public infrastructure otherwise it would not be permitted
to be more than 200-ft long. No discussion of when the road must be offered has yet
occurred. Staff recommends the Board require an irrevocable offer of dedication and deed
for the roadway be provided as part of the Phase 2 subdivision application. Staff considers
provision of an irrevocable offer for Phase 1 may result in future property owners requesting
City Council take over a roadway that does not meet City standards. In addition, the totality
of the road will not be subdivided until Phase 2.
Respectfully submitted,
Marla Keene, P.E.
Senior Development Review Planner
SHED
POOL
HOUSE
(#950)
GARAGE
A/C A/C
GARAGE
(#896)
SHED
HOUSE
(#900)
HOUSE
(#896)
SHED
SILO
(898)
EXIST. SOLAR PA
N
E
L
S725.79' N 83°09'1
5
"
E
59
8
.
9
4
'
S
0
4
°
5
0
'
1
1
"
E
S 83°07'45" W
727.48'
N
0
5
°
5
3
'
2
1
"
W
4
2
0
.
7
2
'
17
8
.
9
1
'
N
0
1
°
4
9
'
1
2
"
W
SHED
A/C
W
?
DE
C
K
HI
N
E
S
B
U
R
G
R
O
A
D
F.F. 408.0
F.F. 396.0
F.F. 384.0
F.F. 380.0
F.F. 418.0±
WATER DISTRIBUTION
FLOW CONTROL VALVE
LEGEND
PROPOSED CONTOUR100
PROPOSED CURB
PROPOSED FENCE
PROPOSED GRAVEL
PROPOSED PAVEMENT
PROPOSED SETBACK LINE
PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE
PROPOSED EASEMENT LINE
DSM
DSM
SAL
1" = 40'
24110
MP-1
MAR., 2024
LOCATION MAP
1" = 2000'
WGM ASSOCIATES
c/o KEITH WRIGHT
P.O. BOX 2352
SOUTH BURLINGTON
VERMONT 05407
7-LOT
SUBDIVISION
PROPOSED
MASTER PLAN
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
P: 802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
896, 900 & 950
HINESBURG RD.
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT
116
89PROJECT
LOCATION
LOT 4
1.00 ACRES
LOT 1D
0.57 ACRES
LOT 1C
0.43 ACRES
LOT 1B
1.03 ACRES
LOT 1A
0.26 ACRES
LOT 2D
0.41 ACRES
LOT 2C
0.44 ACRES
LOT 2B
0.65 ACRES
LOT 2A
1.02 ACRES
LOT 3A
2.05 ACRES
LOT 3B
0.38 ACRES
LOT 3C
0.37 ACRES
PHASE 3
FUTURE POTENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT
MAXINE'S
WAY
PHASE 2
FUTURE POTENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT
PHASE 1
2024-2029
PHASE 1
·ROAD & UTILITY CORRIDOR ALONG
EAST-WEST PORTION OF MAXINE'S WAY
·SEWER CONNECTION & STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT
·CIVIC SPACE INFRASTRUCTURE
(COMMUNITY GARDENS)
·BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
PHASE 2
·NORTH-SOUTH ROAD &
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
·BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
PHASE 3
·UTILITY EXTENSIONS
·BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
PHASE 1 ROAD
CONSTRUCTION
LIMITS
PHASE 3
DEDICATION OF
R.O.W./EASEMENT
LOT 3C DUPLEX WITH ONE
UNIT MEETING INCLUSIONARY
HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
PHASE 0
EXISTING
PHASE 0
EXISTING
PHASE 0
EXISTING
PHASE 0
EXISTING
8/21/24 DSM REVISED PER CITY REVIEW
10/7/24 DSM REVISED PER CITY REVIEW
P:\
A
u
t
o
C
A
D
D
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
0
2
4
\
2
4
1
1
0
-
W
G
M
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
\
1
-
C
A
D
D
F
i
l
e
s
\
d
w
g
\
2
4
1
1
0
-
S
i
t
e
.
d
w
g
,
1
0
/
7
/
2
0
2
4
1
1
:
4
6
:
5
8
A
M
W
W
W
W
W
W
EXIST. SOLAR PA
N
E
L
S
W
?
W
W
W
W
W
W
HI
N
E
S
B
U
R
G
R
O
A
D
W
W
W
W
W
MEADOWLAND D
R
I
V
E
LANDON ROAD
HAPPY TAILS
PET RESORT
AND SPA
DYNAPOWER
85 MEADOWLAND DR.
DR POWER
EQUIPMENT
800 HINESBURG RD.
LANE PRESS
87 MEADOWLAND DR.
VT
.
R
T
E
.
1
1
6
INTE
R
S
T
A
T
E
8
9
STERLING
HOMES
896 HINESBURG RD.
900 HINESBURG RD.
950 HINESBURG RD.
898 HINESBURG RD.
1037 HINESBURG RD.
1045 HINESBURG RD.
OFFICIAL MAP -
PROPOSED PATH
IN 20' R.O.W
OFFICIAL MAP -
PROPOSED EXIT 12B
OFF-RAMP
CITY PLAN 2024 -
PROPOSED SHARED
USE PATH ALONG
HINESBURG RD.
EXISTING
RECREATION
PATH
EXISTING 20' WIDE
REC. PATH
EASEMENT
W
W
W W
W
W
W
W
FUTURE 8" WATERMAIN
FUTURE SIDEWALK
FUTURE 44' R.O.W.
FUTURE HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY
FUTURE HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY
FUTURE HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY
DSM
DSM
SAL
1" = 80'
24110
MP-2
MAR., 2024
LOCATION MAP
1" = 2000'
WGM ASSOCIATES
c/o KEITH WRIGHT
P.O. BOX 2352
SOUTH BURLINGTON
VERMONT 05407
7-LOT
SUBDIVISION
PLANNING
AREA PLAN
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
P: 802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
116
89PROJECT
LOCATION
896, 900 & 950
HINESBURG RD.
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT
8/21/24 DSM REVISED PER CITY REVIEW
10/7/24 DSM REVISED PER CITY REVIEW
P:\
A
u
t
o
C
A
D
D
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
0
2
4
\
2
4
1
1
0
-
W
G
M
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
\
1
-
C
A
D
D
F
i
l
e
s
\
d
w
g
\
2
4
1
1
0
-
S
i
t
e
.
d
w
g
,
1
0
/
8
/
2
0
2
4
8
:
1
1
:
4
2
A
M
SHED
POOL
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
HOUSE
950
S
GARAGE
HEDGE ROW
APPROX. LOCATION
OF SEPTIC SYSTEM
APPROX. LOCATION
EXIST. WW SYSTEM
A/
C
GARAGE
SHED
HOUSE
900
HOUSE
896
SHED
SILO
HEDGE ROW
SOLAR PANELS
HED
G
E
R
O
W
EXIST EL. & COMM. EASE.
10' FROM PL Vol. 176 Pg. 138
EXIST. GAS & WATER
EASEMENTS 40' FROM PL
(NOT ON SURVEYED PROPERTY)
EXIST. 20'
SEWER EASEMENT
N 83°09'15" E 725
.
7
9
'
T
o
t
a
l
S 83°07'45" W 7
2
7
.
4
8
'
LOT 1A
0.26
ACRES LOT 1B
1.08 ACRES
LOT 1C
0.47 ACRES
LOT 1D
0.61 ACRES
LO
T
4
C
O
M
M
O
N
L
A
N
D
1.
0
0
A
C
R
E
S
LOT 2
2.73 ACRES
LOT 3
3.02 ACRES
73.05'
13
1
.
8
2
'
V
T
.
R
O
U
T
E
1
1
6
HI
N
E
S
B
U
R
G
R
O
A
D
800 Hinesburg Rd.
n/f Waterloo Real Estate Group, LLC
Vol. 1599 Pg. 02
"DR Power Equip."
n/f
835 Hinesburg
Road, LLC
Vol. 468 Pg. 691
87 Meadowland Dr.
n/f Landrum
Vol. 218 Pg. 514
"Lane Press"
85 Meadowland Dr.
n/f Burlington Properties Ltd.
Vol. 514 Pg. 272
"Dynapower"
850, 900, 950 Hinesburg Rd.
WGM Associates
Vol. 655 Pg.16
Vol. 675 Pg. 550
10.05± Acres Total
87 Meadowland Dr.
n/f Landrum
PROPOSED WIDENING OF
HINESBURG RD. R.O.W. BY 7' &
PROPOSED 20' WIDE REC. EASE.
(LINE SHOWN AT 27')
TO
T
I
L
L
E
Y
D
R
I
V
E
-
>
TO
M
E
A
D
O
W
L
A
N
D
D
R
I
V
E
-
>
RW 5 RW 6
RW 14
RW 17
654.44'
N 78°00'16"
E
294.73'
S
0
4
°
5
0
'
1
1
"
E
22
3
.
5
3
'
N 88°21'58" E
89.33'
N 85°26'48" E
51.16'
N 80°46'30" E
225.54'
S53°
2
3
'
5
3
"
W
86.3
8
'
S 87°19'33" W
34.49'
S 01°49'12" E
7.09'
S
0
5
°
5
3
'
2
1
"
E
2
2
2
.
6
7
'
N 01°49'12" W
40.00'
N01°36'27"W
34.14'
N 54°57'00" E
18.58'
N 03°54'08" W
95.03'
115.00'
86.67'
S
0
1
°
4
9
'
1
2
"
E
167.69'
N 83°09'15" E
1141.5' to CMF ->
17
0
.
2
5
'
N
0
4
°
4
5
'
3
9
"
W
RW2RW1
RW 19
RW 18
MAXINE'S WAY
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
0
4
°
5
0
'
1
1
"
E
5
9
8
.
9
4
'
SS
SS
S
S
S
S
S
RW 7 RW 8
RW 11RW 12
RW 13
SH
E
D
S
0
4
°
5
0
'
1
1
"
E
12
1
.
0
2
'
2
0
.
0
4
'
N
0
4
°
5
0
'
1
1
"
W
11
4
.
1
7
'
S
0
6
°
4
9
'
1
8
"
E
19
4
.
9
1
'
S
0
6
°
4
9
'
1
8
"
E
19
8
.
1
8
'
74.13'
N88°05'01"E
81.40'
CMF
0.3' BG
CMF
0.4' AG
CMP
CMF
Flush
EXIST. GRAVEL EDGES
EXIST. GRAVEL AREA
EX
I
S
T
.
G
R
A
V
.
D
R
.
RW 3
RW 4
RW 16
RW 15
RW 10
15
'
15
'
40'
n/f
Landrum
S
S
S
E1
E10
E1
E2
E3
E5
E6
E4
E4
E7
E8
E7
E9
E9
N
4
6
°
2
9
'
2
9
"
W
8
3
.
6
5
'
ACCESS
SEWER
ACCESS
WATER
ACCESS
SEWER
SEWER
EL / COM
EL / COM
WATER TEMPORARY
TURNAROUND
SEWER
SEWER
ACCESS
40' WIDE R.O.W.
SEWER
283.38'
N0
4
°
5
0
'
1
1
"
W
70
.
8
2
'
CMF
S
51
.
9
3
'
49
.
3
8
'
40'
40.06'
MA
X
I
N
E
'
S
W
A
Y
PR
I
V
A
T
E
N
0
5
°
5
3
'
2
1
"
W
1
9
8
.
0
5
'
FUTURE WIDENING
OF HWY. R.O.W. BY 7'
20' SETBACK FROM
FUTURE R.O.W.
FUTURE WIDENING OF
HIGHWAY R.O.W. BY 7'
20' SETBACK
FROM FUTURE R.O.W.
80'
20
'106'
40
'
73.04'
OE
OE
E7.1
SOLAR EQUIP.
S 88°05'01" W
E9
BLDG. ENV.
(TYPICAL)
BLDG. ENV.
(TYPICAL)
BLDG. ENV.
(TYPICAL)
BLDG. ENV.
(TYPICAL)
BLDG. ENV.
(TYPICAL)
E11
ACCESS
LOT 1E
0.14 ACRES
40' R.O.W.
0.70 ACRES
EXISTING EASEMENT TO BE
CONVERTED TO FUTURE 40' R.O.W.
PARCEL WITH THE SUBSEQUENT
DEVELOPMENT OF PHASE 2
XXX
TRC
CEA
1" = 50'
24110
P1
NOT to SCALE
A
C
E
WGM
ASSOCIATES
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
896, 900 & 950 Hinesburg Rd.
South Burlington, Vermont
MAY __, 2024
Plat of Survey
7-Lot Subdivision
RECEIVED FOR RECORDING IN THE LAND RECORDS OF THE CITY
OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, AT______________ O'CLOCK
ON THE ______ DAY OF __________, 20_____.
ATTEST: ____________________________, CITY CLERK
APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, ON
THE _____ DAY OF _____________, 20____, SUBJECT TO THE
REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION.
SIGNED THIS _____ DAY OF ______________, 20______.
BY ___________________________________, CHAIRPERSON
To the best of my knowledge and belief
this plat depicts the results of a survey
conducted by me as described in "Survey
Notes" above, based upon our analysis of
land records and evidence found in the
field. Existing boundaries shown are in
substantial conformance with the records,
except as noted. This plat is in substantial
compliance with 27 VSA 1403,
"Recording of Land Plats". This statement
valid only when accompanied by my
original signature and seal.
_______________________________
Timothy R. Cowan VT LS 597
- New Easement Notes -
E.1. New 40' Wide Access Easement across Lots 1A-1D and Lot 2 to serve City, Lots
1A-1D, Lots 2 - 4. (Includes T-shaped turn-around Lot 1D and Lot 2.)
E.2. New 20' Wide Access Easement across portions of Lot 1A and Lot 2, within
existing gravel drive to serve Lot 3.
E.3. New 30' Wide Shared Access Easement, centered on lot line, to serve Lots 2
and 3.
E.4. New 20' Wide Water Line Easement (SHADED) to serve Lots 1A - 1D, centered
on new water line as constructed.
E.5.New Sewer Line Easement to be centered on new sewer line as constructed, to
serve Lot 1A. (To be 20' wide except where restricted by property lines and/or
buildings.)
E.6. New 20' Wide Sewer Line Easement to be centered on new sewer line as
constructed, to serve Lot 3.
E.7. New Power & Communications Easement (SHADED) bound northerly by
existing northerly property line. (To be 20' wide except where restricted by
property lines and/or buildings.) To include Electrical Easement to/from existing
solar panels on Lots 1D and 4.
E.7.1. Extension easterly of 20' wide Easement E.7. for Access and Service to/from
existing solar panels, widening to 40' wide as shown surrounding panels.
E.8. New 10' Wide Sewer Easement on lands of Waterloo Real Estate Group to
serve Lot 1A.
E.9.New 20' Wide Sewer Easement, centered on new sewer line as constructed to
serve Lots 1A - 1D and Lot 3.
E.10 Temporary 40' wide easement for turnaround at SE corner of Lot 1D.
Dimensions as shown. Easement shall revert to Lot 1D upon extension of
Maxine's Way southerly and connecting with the Dynapower access road.
E.11 12' wide easement for service access to solar array.
PROGRESS PLANS
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
08/21/24
- Location Map -
NOT to SCALE
- Survey Notes -
1.Purpose of this survey is to retrace the boundaries of an existing parcel of land deeded to WGM
Associates by deed recorded in Volume 675 at Page 550 of the South Burlington Land Records.
Other neighboring property lines and buildings shown MAY be approximate only, and are shown
for information purposes only.
- Referenced Plats or Plans -
A. "Property Survey, Wright Farm, Hinesburg Rd., ... Owned by H. & B. Realty, Inc." dated
2/7/1979 by Engineers Incorporated of Vermont. Map Slide 150.1, South Burlington
Land Records (SBLR)
B. "Plat of Land of Semicon Components, Inc." dated 12/6/1981 and last revised
8/29/1986 by Trudell Consulting Engineers Inc. [TCE] Map Slide 193.1 of SBLR.
C. "ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey, Telephone Operating Company of Vermont, LLC ... 800
Hinesburg Road." dated 9/11/2014 by TCE. Not of Record.
D. "Site Plan, WRT - South Burlington Property LLC", last revised 2/10/2016 by TCE.
Not of Record.
E. "Proposed 4-Lot Subdivision, Burlington Properties, L.P." dated March 10, 2010 and last
revised Sept. 15, 2010 by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Map Slide 549.4, SBLR.
F. "Plat of Land of Mitel, Inc.", last revised 5/21/1984, by TCE. Map Slide 170.4, SBLR.
G. "Landrum and Orchard Lake Road Properties", last revised 2/03/1988, by TCE.
Map Slide 208.5, SBLR.
- Wright Lane R.O.W. -
116
89PROJECT
LOCATION
LINE BEARING DISTANCE
RW 2 - 3 N 88°05'01" E 115.53'
RW 4 -5 S 72°12'36" E 36.54'
RW 6 -7 N 81°31'24" E 320.88'
RW 7 - 8 N 81°31'24" E 40.06'
RW 8 - 10 S 04°50'11" E 20.04'
RW 11-12 S 85°09'49" W 40.00'
RW 12-13 N 04°50'11" W 48.24'
RW 13-14 S 81°31'24" W 318.33'
RW 15-16 N 72°12'36" W 36.54'
RW 17-18 S 88°05'01" W 108.33'
CURVE RADIUS ARC DELTA
RW 3-4 120.00'41.27'19°42'23"
RW 5-6 80.00'36.67'26°15'59"
RW 14-15 120.00'55.01'26°15'59"
RW 16-17 80.00'27.52'19°42'23"
E9
- Legend -
- Lease Agreement -
1.Facilities on and near the silo shown on on the southerly part of proposed
Lot 1A are or may be subject to a Lease Agreement made with
Independant Wireless One Leased Realty Corp., dated March 25, 2013
and recorded in Volume 1148 at Page 328. NOT PLOTTABLE.
2.Field survey was conducted during March 2024 with RTK GPS and electronic total station instrumentation.
Bearings shown are from Grid North, Vermont Coordinate System of 1983, based upon our GPS observations on
or adjacent to the site (Reference Frame NAD83 (2011, Epoch 2010)).
3. Concrete monuments shown as “found” are typically 4" x 4". Condition of markers found are “good” unless
otherwise noted. Corners denoted “Proposed” shall typically consist of 5/8” diameter rebar or 4" square concrete
monuments capped with aluminum disks stamped “CEA, Inc. - VT LS 597”, typically set flush with existing grade.
4. Hinesburg Road (VT. Route 116) is a public highway with a historical R.O.W. width of 4 rods (66'). Proposals
exist to widen the R.O.W. by 14' and require a 20' building setback therefrom, as shown.
5. Land areas shown for Lots 1A, 2 and 3 are to the existing sideline of Hinesburg Road (VT. Route 116.)
6. Not being within the scope of this survey, Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. has conducted no investigation
whatsoever respecting whether or not the property and each component thereof is in compliance with state or
local permits.
7. Utilities shown do not purport to constitute or represent all utilities located upon or adjacent to the surveyed
premises. Existing utility locations are approximate only. Buried utilities shown are depicted based solely on
surface indications. Actual locations may vary. Contact Dig Safe (888-344-7233) prior to any construction.
7/1/24 DSM REVISED E4
P:\
A
u
t
o
C
A
D
D
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
0
2
4
\
2
4
1
1
0
-
W
G
M
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
\
1
-
C
A
D
D
F
i
l
e
s
\
d
w
g
\
2
4
1
1
0
S
u
r
v
e
y
P
l
a
t
.
d
w
g
,
8
/
2
1
/
2
0
2
4
8
:
3
7
:
0
7
A
M