Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSP-24-08 - Supplemental - 0870 Williston Road (21)1 Marla Keene From:Derick Read <Derick.Read@krebsandlansing.com> Sent:Monday, September 9, 2024 2:38 PM To:Marla Keene Cc:amitchell@aam15.com; Dan Messier; Jeff Hodgson; Cynthia Silvey; Israel Smith, AIA Subject:Re: EXTERNAL: Re: SP-24-08 870 Williston - round 2 comments Hi Marla, As we were reviewing the lighting design we decided that would like to remove the A2 light pole and fixture at the driveway, closest to Williston Road. 2 Can you please let us know if this sketch is sufficient to satisfy the 13.07 Exterior Light requirements? 3 (P&Z Follow up 9/6: We’ll accept the spillover at the building addition since the illumination is compatible with street lighting. Please reduce the levels at the large parking lot fixture near the driveway to be limited to 0.3 footcandles or less at the property line. If your intent is to illuminate the sidewalk, you may do so using a pedestrian scale fixture instead of spillover from a parking lot fixture.) Thanks Derick Derick Read, P.E. Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Colchester, Vermont 05446 O: (802) 878-0375 C: (802) 598-9911 Derick.Read@krebsandlansing.com On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 3:38 PM Marla Keene <mkeene@southburlingtonvt.gov> wrote: Hi Derick, Here are our remaining comments. We’re down to just landscaping, lighting, and stormwater. Let me know if you have questions. We can’t calculate the required landscaping bond amount until the landscaping issues are addressed. The value should only reflect the plant cost; you may omit the hardscape cost from the required bond. This will be enumerated in the decision. Have a nice weekend, Marla Keene, PE Development Review Planner City of South Burlington (802) 846-4106 From: Derick Read <Derick.Read@krebsandlansing.com> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2024 4:40 PM To: Marla Keene <mkeene@southburlingtonvt.gov> 4 Cc: amitchell@aam15.com; Dan Messier <dmessier@aam15.com>; Jeff Hodgson <jhodgson@wagnerhodgson.com>; Cynthia Silvey <csilvey@wagnerhodgson.com>; Israel Smith, AIA <iz@sbavt.net> Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: SP-24-08 870 Williston - round 2 comments Hi Marla, Welcome back. I hope you had a relaxing vacation! We've pulled together the material that we believe will adequately provide positive findings for your review comments. Our response narrative, supporting plans, landscape exhibits, and previously issued stormwater material is included in the link below. https://ln5.sync.com/dl/43cb249d0/zhtkj5nm-de8tcnt5-hm84mgm3-dufqvu8w We are very hopeful this project (SP-24-08) can be reviewed and approved independently of the application for the portion on UVM lands. We are really pushing to start at the beginning of September if at all possible. Please feel free to call with any questions. Thanks Derick Derick Read, P.E. Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Colchester, Vermont 05446 O: (802) 878-0375 C: (802) 598-9911 Derick.Read@krebsandlansing.com 5 On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 8:40 AM Marla Keene <mkeene@southburlingtonvt.gov> wrote: Hi folks, Just a minor update in the attached. I received comments from SBWD and City Arborist and have incorporated them. Marla Keene, PE Development Review Planner City of South Burlington (802) 846-4106 From: Derick Read <Derick.Read@krebsandlansing.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2024 9:08 PM To: Marla Keene <mkeene@southburlingtonvt.gov> Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: SP-24-08 870 Williston - round 2 comments This message has originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email. Thanks Marla. This is very helpful. We'll be sure to get going on the responses and the guidance on the demolition is also very appreciated. Thanks Derick Derick Read, P.E. Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street 6 Colchester, Vermont 05446 O: (802) 878-0375 C: (802) 598-9911 Derick.Read@krebsandlansing.com On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 2:38 PM Marla Keene <mkeene@southburlingtonvt.gov> wrote: Hi Derick, I apologize for not being able to get this to you last week. I hope you are enjoying your vacation and Amanda and Dan are able to delegate out the comments to the necessary people in your absence. Please find an updated comment letter attached in both word and PDF format. Regarding the decision about whether to retain the existing wing, if you were to decide to retain the existing wing instead of demolish it after this pending decision is issued, that would require a site plan amendment, which would be relatively simple. However, you could continue to work on the new building construction while that amendment were in process. You just wouldn’t be able to get a certificate of occupancy until the amendment was issued and the required appeal period expired. You also mentioned something about wanting to keep the wing because of a housing shortage. If you were to use the wing as housing and not a hotel (ie no longer paying rooms and meals tax), you would need to meet inclusionary housing requirements for the new units, as well as pay residential impact fees. Any conversion from hotel to residential is considered to be the creation of new housing units. Let me know if you have questions. Sincerely, 7 Marla Keene, PE Development Review Planner City of South Burlington 180 Market Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4106 www.southburlingtonvt.gov Notice - Under Vermont’s Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation.