The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda - Planning Commission - 07/25/2017South Burlington Planning Commission 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4106 www.sburl.com Meeting Tuesday, July 25, 2017 7:00 pm South Burlington Municipal Offices, 575 Dorset Street AGENDA: 1. Directions on emergency evacuation procedures from conference room (7:00 pm) 2. Agenda: Additions, deletions or changes in order of agenda items (7:01 pm) a. Staff memo 3. Open to the public for items not related to the agenda (7:02 pm) 4. Planning Commissioner announcements and staff report (7:10 pm) 5. Initial review of requests for amendments to the Land Development Regulations (7:15 pm) a. Allow Radio/TV Studio in the I/O District, Joe Weith, White + Burke (7:15 pm) b. Modify City Center Form Based Code T3 door standards, Leon Brown (7:30 pm) 6. Review of draft Urban Design Overlay District Standards (Shelburne Road, Williston Road) (7:45 pm) 7. Summary of possible upcoming minor amendments to the City Center Form Based Code: T4 glazing standards, T3 doorways & porches, T3 building types, accessory structures, off-site landscaping & open space, technical corrections (8:40 pm) 8. Meeting Minutes (8:50 pm) 9. Other Business (8:52 pm) 10. Adjourn (8:55 pm) Respectfully submitted, Paul Conner, AICP Director of Planning & Zoning South Burlington Planning Commission Meeting Participation Guidelines 1. The Planning Commission Chair presents these guidelines for the public attending Planning Commission meetings to insure that everyone has a chance to speak and that meetings proceed smoothly. 2. Initial discussion on an agenda item will generally be conducted by the Commission. As this is our opportunity to engage with the subject, we would like to hear from all commissioners first. After the Commission has discussed an item, the Chair will ask for public comment. Please raise your hand to be recognized to speak and the Chair will try to call on each participant in sequence. 3. Once recognized by the Chair, please identify yourself to the Commission. 4. If the Commission suggests time limits, please respect them. Time limits will be used when they can aid in making sure everyone is heard and sufficient time is available for Commission to conduct business items. 5. Side conversations between audience members should be kept to an absolute minimum. The hallway outside the Community Room is available should people wish to chat more fully. 6. Please address the Chair. Please do not address other audience members or staff or presenters and please do not interrupt others when they are speaking. 7. Make every effort not to repeat the points made by others. 8. The Chair will make reasonable efforts to allow everyone who is interested in participating to speak once before speakers address the Commission for a second time. 9. The Planning Commission desires to be as open and informal as possible within the construct that the Planning Commission meeting is an opportunity for commissioners to discuss, debate and decide upon policy matters. Regular Planning Commission meetings are not “town meetings”. A warned public hearing is a fuller opportunity to explore an issue, provide input and sway public opinion on the matter. 10. Comments may be submitted before, during or after the meeting to the Planning and Zoning Department. All written comments will be circulation to the Planning Commission and kept as part of the City Planner's official records of meetings. Comments must include your first and last name and a contact (e-mail, phone, address) to be included in the record. Published by ClerkBase ©2019 by Clerkbase. No Claim to Original Government Works. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com TO: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: Paul Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning SUBJECT: PC Meeting Packet for July 25, 2017 1. Directions on emergency evacuation procedures from conference room (7:00 pm) 2. Agenda: Additions, deletions or changes in order of agenda items (7:01 pm) 3. Open to the public for items not related to the agenda (7:02 pm) 4. Planning Commissioner announcements and staff report (7:10 pm) 5. Initial review of requests for amendments to the Land Development Regulations (7:15 pm) a. Allow Radio/TV Studio in the I/O District, Joe Weith, White + Burke (7:15 pm) See the attached memo and request b. Modify City Center Form Based Code T3 door standards, Leon Brown (7:30 pm) See the attached memo and request 6. Review of draft Urban Design Overlay District Standards (Shelburne Road, Williston Road) (7:45 pm) At this meeting, we’ll discuss some of the follow-up items from the Commission’s discussion last month on Shelburne Road basic form standards. These include: • Identification of “key intersections” at which heights and setbacks may vary from elsewhere • Parking Standards – within the overlay area or city-wide • Possible discussion of Table of Uses Enclosed with your packet are a pair of maps depicting potential “key intersections” as well as some updated language for the Overlay District. 7. Summary of possible upcoming minor amendments to the City Center Form Based Code: T4 glazing standards, T3 doorways & porches, T3 building types, accessory structures, off-site landscaping & open space, technical corrections (8:40 pm) Staff will provide a brief summary of topics that are anticipated to be included in a set of proposed “quick fixes” at an upcoming meeting. 8. Meeting Minutes (8:50 pm) 9. Other Business (8:52 pm) 10. Adjourn (8:55 pm) 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com TO: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: Paul Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning SUBJECT: Zoning amendment requests: Allow Radio/TV Studio in the I/O District, Joe Weith, White + Burke Modify City Center Form Based Code T3 door standards, Leon Brown DATE: July 25, 2017 Planning Commission meeting The Commission has recently received two unrelated requests for amendments to the Land Development Regulations. Pursuant to the Commission’s policy, these requests are being put forward for the Commission’s initial consideration. In this initial review, the Commission can choose several options pursuant to the policy: • Take up consideration of the amendment in the short term • Decide to take up consideration of the amendment, at a later time in the Commission’s work plan • Decide not to pursue the amendment Staff has performed an initial examination of the requests in accordance with the policy, discussed below. Request to Allow Radio/TV Studio in the I/O District, Joe Weith, White + Burke David White of White + Burke has submitted a request that “Radio / TV studio” be allowed in some form in the Industrial/Open Space District. Staff has performed an initial review of this request and generally has no concerns with it. This use is presently allowable in the following districts: Commercial 1, Commercial 1 –auto, Allen Road, Swift Street, Commercial 2, and Industrial-Commercial. The use is in many ways very similar in function to a general office, with limited character tics of light industry (antennas, a few trucks, etc.). Both of these other uses are allowable in the Industrial-Open Space District. The I/O District presently includes the area around Tilley Drive, Meadowlands Business Park, and the west side of Hinesburg Road across from Meadowlands. Staff recommends that the Commission discuss the potential amendment, and if it is supportive, to direct staff to make a change in the table of uses to allow for this use. The Commission may, of course, select any of the options discussed at the start of this memo or seek additional information regarding impacts of such a use. Request to Modify City Center Form Based Code T3 door standards, Leon Brown Leon Brown, property owner in City Center, has submitted a request that the T3 Building Envelope Standards be modified to allow dwelling units to be accessed from a door that does not face the street. Mr. Brown’s lot is rectangular and is narrow. It is a former single-family house lot, with the typical dimensions found in such lots in the City’s older neighborhoods - ~70’ x ~150’. Staff has taken an initial look at the request. The Form Based Code, and in particular the T3 District, use certain Building Envelope Standards and lot requirements to establish the overall massing and scale of buildings and uses. Thus, the doorways facing the street set a certain scale and size of building. There may be other ways of achieving the objectives of this district, however. Staff recommends that the Commission have a brief discussion on the topic and what direction it would like to pursue. If the Commission elects to pursue an amendment, staff’s recommendation would be for staff to reach out to some folks in the local design community and come back with options for the Commission’s consideration. July 14, 2017 Paul Conner Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: IO District – Radio & Television Studio use Dear Paul, This letter requests the South Burlington Planning Commission amend the City’s Land Development Regulations (LDR) to make Radio & Television Studio use a permitted use in the Industrial/Open Space (IO) zoning district. As you and I have previously discussed, we have a client interested in locating a broadcast studio in Meadowlands Park on Hinesburg Road (RT 116). The land is zoned IO. Appendix C of the current LDR indicates Radio & Television Studios are not permitted nor conditional use in the IO district. A broadcast studio seems consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan as well as compatible with other existing and allowed uses. Our client is under some time pressure due to an upcoming lease expiration and the time it will require to plan, permit and construct a new facility. Accordingly, on their behalf I request the Planning Commission include this change in the current round of amendments they are reviewing. We also request a public hearing be warned in July or August for a date no later than late August or early September. In the event other LDR changes being considered get bogged down, I also request the Planning Commission consider warning a hearing for this change alone so that it is not delayed. I recognize this would be an inconvenience, but hope the Planning Commission will accommodate us. I’m happy to answer any questions and discuss this further. Best Regards, David G. White President From: Leon Brown [mailto:leon@brownelectricvt.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2017 2:30 PM To: Paul Conner Cc: ray; 'Tyler Brown' Subject: RE: 57 Hinesburg Rd. SB. Hello Paul, Thank you for meeting up with Tyler and I yesterday… I reviewed every building and/or dwelling along Hinesburg Road and they all have only one entry door facing the main roadway… Even in our meeting we all had difficulties coming up with a solution, including our past reviewed plans. We need to making something look nice and appealing to the surrounding environment. I recommend editing the new regulations, which we are all learning to groom current details, and find what’s practical. Basically; having all the entry doors facing the main roadway is a huge issues and unappealing, just like the front porches. It doesn’t fit in with the surrounding buildings and/or residential community. Again, please revised and remove this entry door requirement. Thank you! I look forward to our next meeting soon. Again, Thank you! Regards, Leon A. Brown, V.P. VT EM-2936 / VT Fire Alarm TQP / NH 11712M Brown Electric Co. Inc. 440 Shunpike Road Williston, Vermont 05495 P: (802) 863-2060 F: (802) 660-4341 C: (802) 598-8844 Urban Design Overlay District Planning Commission working draft July 21, 2017 Urban Design Overlay – Building Heights Staff note: Below are proposed height standards associated with the proposed Urban Design Overlay District. See the attached map for potential locations of primary and secondary nodes. These are anticipated, in most cases, to be corner lots. Building Heights Location Height Setback Designated Primary Node Minimum 2 stories; Maximum 5 stories. Minimum 10 feet Designated Secondary Node Appearance of two stories at minimum. Buildings less than 6k sf gfa may be one story. Maximum 4 stories Minimum 10 feet All other properties Maximum 3 stories Minimum 20 feet For all properties, Floor-to-Floor Height First story 20' Max.; upper Stories 14' Max (a) No building shall be more than 2 stories taller than an adjacent building on the same side of the street within 100 feet. (b) No building shall be more than 1 story taller than shortest R4 building on adjacent property. Increases by 1 story for each 75’ of separation, up to allowable maximum. (c) Stories of buildings within the Urban Design Overlay District are defined as per Section 8.06(F) of these Regulations. (d) Section 8.06(G) of these regulations shall apply to rooftop elements of buildings within the Urban Design Overlay District. £¤7 PinnacleDrLAURELHILLDR EXTDisclaimer:The accuracy of information presented is determined by its sources. Errors and omissions may exist. Questions of on-the-ground location can be resolved by site inspections and/or surveys by registered surveyor. This map is not sufficient for delineation of features on-the-ground. This map identifies the presence of features, and may indicate relationships between features, but is not a replacement for surveyed information or engineering studies. 0 900 1,800 2,700450Feet Legend Ü Map Prepared July 21, 2017FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Primary Node Secondary Node Urban Design Overlay District £¤2 Disclaimer:The accuracy of information presented is determined by its sources. Errors and omissions may exist. Questions of on-the-ground location can be resolved by site inspections and/or surveys by registered surveyor. This map is not sufficient for delineation of features on-the-ground. This map identifies the presence of features, and may indicate relationships between features, but is not a replacement for surveyed information or engineering studies. 0 360 720 1,080180Feet Legend Ü Map Prepared July 21, 2017FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Primary Node Secondary Node Urban Design Overlay DistrictWilliston Road Parking Standards Outline of Concepts South Burlington Planning Commission July 21, 2017 Parking Standards in South Burlington – Outline of Problem & Concepts Options for changes to parking requirements include: • Choice of geography. Could be city-wide, or connected to Urban Design Overlay District. • Eliminate all minimums. • Reduce by a percentage. Half appears more in line with what we are hearing; 25% would be in line with allowance currently permitted as a waiver by the Development Review Board. • Reduce to a standard fixed amount. In the City Center FBC area, non-residential uses all have a minimum of 2 space per 1,000 s.f. In the SEQ Village Commercial District, all non-residential uses have a minimum of 3 spaces per 1,000 s.f. Current Conditions / Outline of the problem Adverse issues created by parking minimums: • Current requirements in South Burlington are not ‘right-sized’. • Often too high or too tenant-specific. ITE guidebooks are based on decades-old developments. This creates a great deal of unused impervious surfaces. • Seeking permission to change tenants may require an expensive and time-consuming study, as well as a time-consuming development review process. • They appear to make a statement that cars are valued more than the business, the place, or the open spaces. Vehicle trips are encouraged or made easier. • Reduced density (and affordability?)- Property owners may feel or actually be limited in density, especially in urban areas, by parking requirements where increased density is actually sought. • Creates problems for infill development or redevelopment. Adverse issues with expansive and unused parking lots: • Stormwater runoff becomes a greater concern. • Creates gaps between buildings, or gaps between a street and a building. • Costly to both a community and a developer: parking takes valuable land away from taxable and income-producing properties. • Often creates impediments to other modes of transportation, including walking, biking, and use of public transportation. Fast Facts: • Each parking space requires almost 300 square feet, to accommodate the space itself and the associated drive aisle. • Where minimum parking standards exceed ~ 3½ spaces per 1,000 s.f. of building, it is requiring more space to be allocated to parking than to taxable, building area. • Current regulations authorize the DRB to allow a parking waiver of up to 25%. These are often sought in some form and are almost always granted. SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES 11 JULY 2017 1 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 11 July 2017, at 7:00 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Louisos, Chair; B. Gagnon, M. Ostby, A. Klugo ALSO PRESENT: C. LaRose, City Planner; S. Murray, M. Kane, Consultants; S. Dopp 1. Directions on emergency evacuation procedure from conference room: The Chair provided directions on emergency evacuation in the event of an emergency. 2. Agenda: Additions, deletions or changes in order of agenda items: No changes were made to the Agenda. 3. Open to the public for items not related to the agenda: Ms. Dopp expressed concern with an informational meeting held at UVM yesterday at which developers received an RFP for potential development of the Edland and Martin parcels of UVM land. Ms. LaRose showed these parcels on an overhead photo. Ms. Dopp said the proposals are due by 18 August. The South Burlington Land Trust is trying to figure out what to do about this as the properties involve land which slopes down to Potash Brook, which could be a runoff issue, an active wildlife corridor, and a dysfunctional intersection. The Edland property also contains a unique sand dune from the Pleisticene era. Ms. Dopp also noted that the Vermont Land Trust is reluctant to think of buying the property(s) because the money would be going from one state entity to another. Ms. Louisos said the can put the city in a bad position with developers putting money into a proposal without contacting the city. Ms. Ostby noted that at a recent meeting, the City Manager said that UVM is experimenting with this process, and if it works, they would do it again. Mr. Klugo said the process is not unusual, and it does not mean the city doesn’t get to determine what goes on that land. Mr. Gagnon added that people issue RFPs all the time to study something they may or may not move forward on. He added that since zoning changes are required in order to develop those properties, that would involve full public hearings. Ms. Dopp noted there is a parcel between the 2 properties that has been sold, and cited the need to know what the new owner is planning. 2 Ms. LaRose offered that the PUD agenda item on the night’s meeting may discuss rezoning needs across the City, which may or may not include UVM lands irrespective of the RFP. The Board agreed that no immediate proactive action was needed and they would wait on staff or University proposals. 4. Planning Commission Announcements and Staff Report: Ms. Ostby: Attended the Affordable Housing Committee meeting. The Committee is disappointed that the Larkin project on Shelburne Rd. does not have an affordable housing element. They discussed ways for committees to get involved earlier on in the process. The Committee is also going to ask the Planning Commission to make inclusionary zoning a city- wide policy. In a separate issue, the Committee has concerns with congregate care facilities which wouldn’t fall under the “replacement policy” because they are not under the residential category in the City’s zoning. Mr. Klugo: Attended the New England Chapter of AIA conference on the environment. The balance of the time was spend on what communities are ignoring, specifically water resources, and what can be done to minimize the use of untreated water. Ms. LaRose: Noted that Mr. Conner is attending a GIS conference. She also advised that the new Development Review Planner begins work on Monday. 5. Continued Review of PUD and Master Plan Project, Phase II: Ms. Murray advised that they have met twice with staff to consider what might be appropriate in various places. This initiated the discussion of underlying zoning. Ms. Murray then showed a chart of “triggers.” She said they went with 10 acres as a minimum, but said they might want to look at more. Mr. Kane noted that there is not much land available and showed a map indicating parcels of 10 acres or more and 30 acres or more. Most of that land is in the Southeast Quadrant (SEQ), and much of it cannot be developed. If you eliminate the SEQ for “floating zones” there is not much land left in the city. This suggests that most projects will involve infill. The Commission will also have to consider which elements of the PUD process to consider, since it probably won’t be possible to do them all. Mr. Klugo said not a lot of 30-acre projects are likely to happen. Ms. LaRose said they may have to reduce some expectations because of things that won’t fit into the smaller areas. 3 Ms. Ostby said that other committees would like to provide early input. There is a feeling, for example, that seniors don’t necessarily want to live in a high-rise. Ms. Murray said they did discuss having different types of housing. She cited the Simpson Diversity Index which is tool to provide diversification of housing. She also stressed the need to remember that there is an economic piece attached to this, including the big impediment of land costs. Mr. Kane cited the need for “context” in addition to form. Without there, you don’t have an attractive place to be. Mr. Klugo added that it can take 20-25 years to get to “context.” Ms. Murray noted the importance of having a park in a neighborhood. Ms. Kane said if you draw a circle around schools, shops, etc, where the circles intersect is where you would want to build homes for “context.” Ms. LaRose noted that “minimum density” is a new concept. She asked members what their thoughts are. Ms. Murray said that the “maximum” could become the “minimum.” Ms. Ostby said it’s “an alarm” for her. Ms. Louisos said she would consider each district separately. Mr. Klugo said that what you are protecting against is “lost opportunity.” Mr. Kane said that with protecting the SEQ, there is not much space to build in the rest of the city. He said they have heard a lot from staff about the “underdevelopment” of lots, which is a lost opportunity and lost taxes for the city. Mr. Klugo said they need not to preclude the “highest and best use.” Ms. Louisos said she is not opposed to this, but she wants to be sure “we’re not paving over the city.” They have to be clear where they want this to happen. She suggested the IA district might move more into the “rural” category. Mr. Klugo said he would like to know the percentage of land in the city that can be developed. Ms. Ostby raised the question of how long residents tend to stay in denser housing. Ms. Dopp noted Mayfair Park where people “stay forever” and pass the houses down to their children. It was also noted the many residents of Larkin Terrace, which is being torn down on Shelburne Road, have lived there since the project was built. 4 Ms. Murray noted that things are changing with “millennials” who are not moving far from the urban area. They are looking at town houses, duplexes, each with its own entrance. Mr. Klugo said they should want people to move in order to get new, young families in. The problem is that people are not moving. Ms. Ostby was concerned that people in denser, multi-family housing might not have a “commitment” to the community. Mr. Klugo said that people in his single family neighborhood have shown little commitment to the community. Mr. Klugo said he would suggest working around “nodes.” He felt that was one of the most important things the Commission can do. He stressed that what was lost in the Cider Mill development was the ability for infill. It would be nice to have some of those development rights preserved now to build to greater density. Members then looked at a chart of PUD Land Use Allocations by type and a map of conservation areas. Ms. LaRose said the SEQ has to be treated differently. She also cited the concern with missing something. There are actually 2 densities in the SEQ: the regular density and the density with TDRs. She questioned what the minimum density actually is. She said that if you require the maximum density, you will be requiring someone to buy TDRs, and that may or may not be legal. Ms. Dopp said the character of the SEQ will change if there are concentrations of clusters of homes. Ms. LaRose said that is what can happen now. She reminded members that the city avoided downzoning the now protected land in the SEQ by allowing that density to be purchased and used elsewhere. If you change that now, you are further down-valuing those people’s properties. Ms. Dopp said she wished that density could be used outside the SEQ. She also felt that density should be based on the buildable portion of the land. Mr. Klugo said you are then reducing the value of the land those people own. Mr. Klugo said that the city lacks a “regulating” plan, something between the Comprehensive Plan and the LDRs. He added that he was comfortable with minimum densities, but they would first have to re-look at zoning districts. 5 Ms. LaRose felt zoning districts were mostly right, but they may be right for part of the district and not for another part. She felt major changes may be needed to the zoning map before they can finalize the PUD chart. She acknowledged this will take time, but it is important. Ms. LaRose also noted there are no standards for commercial density, and something is needed as they are not seeing good mixed use development. The question was raised as to what happens when people have a level of expectation of what can happen near them. Disclosure at closings was stressed by Mr. Klugo and Mr. Gagnon as was “buyer beware.” Mr. Kane said the real problem occurs when there is a new adjacent subdivision. Ms. LaRose said what works best is when people have fair and reliable expectations. Mr. Klugo said that in his time on the DRB, when developers were pushed to be more creative, the city got a much better plan. 6. Review and Consider Approval of Proposed Street Names in the O’Brien Family Partnership Neighborhood and rename Western Portion of Eldridge Street to O’Brien Farm Road: Members felt this was a much better proposal than the previous one. Mr. Gagnon moved to approve the street names as delineated on accompanying documents. Mr. Klugo seconded. Motion passed 4-0. 7. Minutes of 27 June 2017: Ms. Ostby asked to revise the minutes as follows: p.2, Section 4 (end) revise to read: Ms. Ostby asked what the local response should be regarding the U.S. decision to leave the Paris agreement. P.3, Section 5 revise to read: 1. Ms. Ostby asked if there is information about the level of long term commitment to the South Burlington community by those who live in apartments and multi-family homes, or do they feel that residence is a more short term living arrangement so are less inclined to become an active community member. Has this been studied in South Burlington? 2. Ms. Ostby asked where in the Comprehensive Plan it states that it is City’s goal to reduce the proportion of single family homes. 6 3. Ms. Ostby quoted Objection 4 “Support the retention of existing and construction of new affordable and moderate-income housing, emphasizing both smaller and single family homes and apartments. Mr. Gagnon moved to approve the minutes of 27 June with the above changes. Mr. Klugo seconded. Motion passed 4-0. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned by common consent at 9:45 p.m. ______________________________Clerk The programs and services of the City of Burlington are accessible to people with disabilities. For accessibility information call 865-7188 (for TTY users 865-7142). ^sƼǋǼŎsŘǼŸ¯ƻĶŘŘÞŘ¶Ř_ʉŸŘÞŘ¶ ˠˣ˨NÌȖǋOÌǢǼǋssǼʰNÞǼɴËĶĶ DȖǋĶÞŘ¶ǼŸŘʰəǻ˟ˤˣ˟ˠ ɠɠɠʳEȖǋĶÞŘ¶ǼŸŘɚǼʳ¶ŸɚˀƼʊ ƻÌŸŘsʲ ʹ˧˟ˡʺ˧˥ˤ˚˦ˠ˧˧ ®ɮʲ ʹ˧˟ˡʺ˧˥ˤ˚˦ˠ˨ˤ ^ɚÞ_ɟÌÞǼsʰÝNƻʰ^ÞǋsOǼŸǋ ōs¶ŘǻȖǼǼĶsʰÝNƻʰNŸŎƼǋsÌsŘǣÞɚsƻĶŘŘsǋ ğɴƼƼĶsǼŸŘʰǢsŘÞŸǋµÝǢˀÝǻƻǋŸ¶ǋŎŎsǋˀŘĶɴǣǼ ǢOŸǼǼµȖǣǼÞŘʰÝNƻʰƻǋÞŘOÞƼĶƻĶŘŘsǋ ōǋɴŷ˅ŗsÞĶʰÝNƻʰƻǋÞŘOÞƼĶƻĶŘŘsǋ ǊɴŘōŸǋǋÞǣŸŘʰǣǣÞǣǼŘǼƻĶŘŘsǋ ŘÞǼɟ_sʰʉŸŘÞŘ¶NĶsǋĨ ĵɴŘs^ǋ¯ĶsǋʰƻĶŘŘÞŘ¶ǻsOÌŘÞOÞŘ ǻŷʲ ǢŸȖǼÌDȖǋĶÞŘ¶ǼŸŘƻĶŘŘÞŘ¶^ÞǋsOǼŸǋ NŸĶOÌsǣǼsǋƻĶŘŘÞŘ¶^ÞǋsOǼŸǋ ɟÞŘŸŸǣĨÞNÞǼɴōŘ¶sǋ NÌÞǼǼsŘ_sŘNŸȖŘǼɴǊs¶ÞŸŘĶƻĶŘŘÞŘ¶^ÞǋsOǼŸǋ əǻ^sƼǋǼŎsŘǼŸ¯ËŸȖǣÞŘ¶Ř_NŸŎŎȖŘÞǼɴ^sɚsĶŸƼŎsŘǼ ®Ǌŷōʲ ōs¶ŘǻȖǼǼĶsʰÝNƻʰNŸŎƼǋsÌsŘǣÞɚsƻĶŘŘsǋʰNÞǼɴŸ¯DȖǋĶÞŘ¶ǼŸŘ ^ǻrʲ ğȖĶɴˠˣʰˡ˟ˠ˦ Ǌrʲ DȖǋĶÞŘ¶ǼŸŘNŸŎƼǋsÌsŘǣÞɚs^sɚsĶŸƼŎsŘǼŷǋ_ÞŘŘOsŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼǣ rŘOĶŸǣs_ʰƼĶsǣs¯ÞŘ_ƼǋŸƼŸǣs_ŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼǣǼŸǼÌsNÞǼɴŸ¯DȖǋĶÞŘ¶ǼŸŘNŸŎƼǋsÌsŘǣÞɚs ^sɚsĶŸƼŎsŘǼŷǋ_ÞŘŘOsʲ x ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠˣƻǋsǣOÌŸŸĶǻsOÌŘÞOĶNŸǋǋsOǼÞŸŘǣ x ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠˤǋǼÞOĶsˣ^sɚsĶŸƼŎsŘǼDŸŘȖǣsǣ x ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠ˥ǊsƼĶOsŎsŘǼōŸEÞĶsËŸŎs x ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠ˦ǊsǼÞŘÞŘ¶ɟĶĶǣ x ʉ˚ˠ˧˚˟ˠƼĶŘDǻəʲ^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘNŸ_s ǻÌsƻĶŘŘÞŘ¶NŸŎŎÞǣǣÞŸŘɠÞĶĶÌŸĶ_ƼȖEĶÞOÌsǋÞŘ¶ŸŘǼÌsƼǋŸƼŸǣs_ŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼǣŸŘǻȖsǣ_ɴʰ Ȗ¶ȖǣǼ˧ʰˡ˟ˠ˦Ǽ˥ʲˣˤƼŎÞŘNŸŘ¯sǋsŘOsǊŸŸŎˠˡʰNÞǼɴËĶĶʰˠˣ˨NÌȖǋOÌǢǼǋssǼʰDȖǋĶÞŘ¶ǼŸŘʳ ƻĶsǣssŘǣȖǋsǼÌÞǣOŸŎŎȖŘÞOǼÞŸŘÞǣ¯Ÿǋɠǋ_s_ǼŸǼÌsOÌÞǋǣŸ¯ɴŸȖǋǋsǣƼsOǼÞɚsƻĶŘŘÞŘ¶ NŸŎŎÞǣǣÞŸŘǣʳǢȖEŎÞǼŘɴOŸŎŎȖŘÞOǼÞŸŘǣ¯ŸǋǼÌsƻĶŘŘÞŘ¶NŸŎŎÞǣǣÞŸŘ˅ǣOŸŘǣÞ_sǋǼÞŸŘǼǼÌs ÌsǋÞŘ¶ǼŸŎsEɴOĶŸǣsŸ¯EȖǣÞŘsǣǣŸŘȖ¶ȖǣǼ˦ʰˡ˟ˠ˦ʳ NNʲ Ř_ɴōŸŘǼǋŸĶĶʰDȖǋĶÞŘ¶ǼŸŘƻĶŘŘÞŘ¶NŸŎŎÞǣǣÞŸŘNÌÞǋ ħÞŎEsǋĶɴǢǼȖǋǼsɚŘǼʰǣǣÞǣǼŘǼNÞǼɴǼǼŸǋŘsɴ ^ɚÞ_ɟÌÞǼsʰÝNƻʰƻĶŘŘÞŘ¶^ÞǋsOǼŸǋ ǢOŸǼǼµȖǣǼÞŘʰÝNƻʰƻǋÞŘOÞƼĶƻĶŘŘsǋ Burlington Planning Commission 149 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Telephone: (802) 865-7188 (802) 865-7195 (FAX) (802) 865-7144 (TTY) www.burlingtonvt.gov/pz Andy Montroll, Chair Bruce Baker, Vice Chair Yves Bradley Alex Friend Emily Lee Harris Roen Jennifer Wallace-Brodeur Eamon Dunn, Youth Member ƻȕDĵÝNËrǊÝŗµŗŷǻÝNr DȖǋĶÞŘ¶ǼŸŘNŸŎƼǋsÌsŘǣÞɚs^sɚsĶŸƼŎsŘǼŷǋ_ÞŘŘOs ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠˣƻǋsǣOÌŸŸĶǻsOÌŘÞOĶŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼǣ ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠˤǋǼÞOĶsˣ^sɚsĶŸƼŎsŘǼDŸŘȖǣsǣ ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠ˥ǊsƼĶOsŎsŘǼōŸEÞĶsËŸŎsǣ ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠ˦ǊsǼÞŘÞŘ¶ɟĶĶǣ ʉ˚ˠ˧˚˟ˠƼĶŘDǻəʲ^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘNŸ_s ƻȖǋǣȖŘǼǼŸˡˣəʳǢʳʳ˘ˣˣˣˠŘ_˘ˣˣˣˣʰŘŸǼÞOsÞǣÌsǋsEɴ¶ÞɚsŘŸ¯ƼȖEĶÞOÌsǋÞŘ¶EɴǼÌsDȖǋĶÞŘ¶ǼŸŘ ƻĶŘŘÞŘ¶NŸŎŎÞǣǣÞŸŘǼŸÌsǋOŸŎŎsŘǼǣŸŘǼÌs¯ŸĶĶŸɠÞŘ¶ƼǋŸƼŸǣs_ŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼǣǼŸǼÌsNÞǼɴŸ¯ DȖǋĶÞŘ¶ǼŸŘ˅ǣNŸŎƼǋsÌsŘǣÞɚs^sɚsĶŸƼŎsŘǼŷǋ_ÞŘŘOsʹN^ŷʺʳǻÌsƼȖEĶÞOÌsǋÞŘ¶ɠÞĶĶǼĨsƼĶOsŸŘ ǻȖsǣ_ɴʰȖ¶ȖǣǼ˧ʰˡ˟ˠ˦Es¶ÞŘŘÞŘ¶Ǽ˥ʲˣˤƼŎÞŘNŸŘ¯sǋsŘOsǊŸŸŎˠˡʰNÞǼɴËĶĶʰˠˣ˨NÌȖǋOÌǢǼǋssǼʰ DȖǋĶÞŘ¶ǼŸŘʰəǻʳ ƻȖǋǣȖŘǼǼŸǼÌsǋsǇȖÞǋsŎsŘǼǣŸ¯ˡˣəʳǢʳʳ˘ˣˣˣˣʹEʺʲ ǢǼǼsŎsŘǼŸ¯ƼȖǋƼŸǣsʲǻÌÞǣŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼÞǣƼǋŸƼŸǣs_ǼŸǼÌsDȖǋĶÞŘ¶ǼŸŘN^ŷǣ¯ŸĶĶŸɠǣʲ x ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠˣʲǻÌsƼȖǋƼŸǣsŸ¯ǼÌÞǣƼǋŸƼŸǣs_ŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼÞǣǼŸOŸǋǋsOǼǼɠŸ¶ƼǣÞŘǼÌsN^ŷǋs¶ǋ_ÞŘ¶ ƼǋsǣOÌŸŸĶǣEɴ__ÞŘ¶ǣǼŘ_ǋ_ǣ¯ŸǋȖǣs¯ŸǋǼÌsŗN˚NǊʊŸŘÞŘ¶_ÞǣǼǋÞOǼǼŸƼƼsŘ_Þɮ˚ȕǣsǻEĶsʰ Ř___ÞŘ¶ŎÞŘÞŎȖŎŸ¯¯˚ǣǼǋssǼƼǋĨÞŘ¶ǋsǇȖÞǋsŎsŘǼǣǼŸǻEĶs˧ʳˠʳ˧˚ˠʳ x ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠˤʲǻÌsƼȖǋƼŸǣsŸ¯ǼÌÞǣƼǋŸƼŸǣs_ŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼÞǣǼŸ__ǋsǣǣ_ȖƼĶÞOÞǼɴŘ_OŸŘǼǋ_ÞOǼÞŸŘǣ EsǼɠssŘǋǼÞOĶsˣŘ_ǋǼÞOĶs˨ǋs¶ǋ_ÞŘ¶_sɚsĶŸƼŎsŘǼEŸŘȖǣsǣÞŘŘsÞ¶ÌEŸǋÌŸŸ_ŎÞɮs_ȖǣsŘ_ ǋsǣÞ_sŘǼÞĶʊŸŘÞŘ¶_ÞǣǼǋÞOǼǣʳÝŘƼǋǼÞOȖĶǋʰǼÌÞǣŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼOĶǋÞ¯ÞsǣǼÌsŎɮÞŎȖŎOȖŎȖĶǼÞɚs _sɚsĶŸƼŎsŘǼEŸŘȖǣĶĶŸɠEĶs¯ŸǋƼǋŸƼsǋǼÞsǣÞŘŘsÞ¶ÌEŸǋÌŸŸ_ŎÞɮs_ȖǣsʊŸŘsǣEɴǋsǼÞŘÞŘ¶Ř __ÞǼÞŸŘĶ˟ʳˤ®ǊEŸŘȖǣʰEȖǼsĶÞŎÞŘǼÞŘ¶ˠ˟¯ǼÌsÞ¶ÌǼEŸŘȖǣʰɠÌsŘƼǋŸɚÞ_ÞŘ¶Ř__ÞǼÞŸŘĶˤ̇ ÞŘOĶȖǣÞŸŘǋɴÌŸȖǣÞŘ¶ŸɚsǋɠÌǼÞǣǋsǇȖÞǋs_ÞŘǋǼÞOĶs˨ʳ__ÞǼÞŸŘĶĶɴʰǼÌÞǣŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼOĶǋÞ¯ÞsǣǼÌǼ _sɚsĶŸƼŎsŘǼEŸŘȖǣsǣŎɴEsOȖŎȖĶǼÞɚsȖƼǼŸʰEȖǼŘŸǼǼŸsɮOss_ʰǼÌsŎɮÞŎȖŎĶĶŸɠEĶs EŸŘȖǣsǣ¯ŸǋƼǋŸƼsǋǼÞsǣÞŘǋsǣÞ_sŘǼÞĶʊŸŘsǣʳǻÌÞǣŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼĶǣŸǋsŎŸɚsǣǼÌsǋsǇȖÞǋsŎsŘǼǼÌǼ ǋsǣÞ_sŘǼÞĶȖǣsOǋsǼs_ǼÌǋŸȖ¶ÌǼÌs_ƼǼÞɚsǋsȖǣsŘ_ǋsǣÞ_sŘǼÞĶOŸŘɚsǋǣÞŸŘEŸŘȖǣsǣEs OŸŘ¯ŸǋŎÞŘ¶ǼŸǼÌsȖŘ_sǋĶɴÞŘ¶ʊŸŘÞŘ¶_ÞǣǼǋÞOǼʰ_ȖsǼŸǼÌsÞŘOŸŘǣÞǣǼsŘOɴǼÌÞǣOǋsǼsǣÞŘĶŸɠ˚_sŘǣÞǼɴ ǋsǣÞ_sŘǼÞĶ_ÞǣǼǋÞOǼǣʳ®ÞŘĶĶɴʰǼÌÞǣŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼOŸǋǋsOǼǣ¯ŸŸǼŘŸǼsɠÌÞOÌƼƼĶÞsǣǣsǼEOĨǼŸ ƼǋŸƼsǋǼÞsǣÞŘǼÌsŗNʰŗōȕʰŘ_ŗN˚ǊʊŸŘsǣɠÌsŘEȖǼǼÞŘ¶ǋsǣÞ_sŘǼÞĶȖǣsǣʰEȖǼŘŸǼǼŸǼÌs ŗN˚NǊʳ x ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠ˥ʲǻÌsƼȖǋƼŸǣsŸ¯ǼÌÞǣƼǋŸƼŸǣs_ŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼÞǣǼŸsŘǣȖǋsǼÌǼĶŘ¶Ȗ¶sÞŘǋǼÞOĶsˤ ǋsɚÞsɠǣǼŘ_ǋ_ǣ¯ŸǋƼƼĶÞOǼÞŸŘǣÞŘɚŸĶɚÞŘ¶ŎŸEÞĶsÌŸŎsƼǋĨOĶǋÞ¯ɴǼÌǼǼÌsǋsɚÞsɠǣǼŘ_ǋ_ǣ ÞŘǋǼÞOĶsˢʰƻǋǼˤ¯ŸǋNŸŘ_ÞǼÞŸŘĶȕǣsǋsɚÞsɠƼƼĶɴǼŸŘsɠŘ_sɮƼŘ_s_ŎŸEÞĶsÌŸŎsƼǋĨǣʰEȖǼ ŘŸǼÞŘ_ÞɚÞ_ȖĶĶɴǼŸǼÌsĶǼsǋǼÞŸŘŸǋǋsƼĶOsŎsŘǼŸ¯ŎŸEÞĶsÌŸŎsɠÞǼÌÞŘƼǋĨʳ x ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠ˦ʲǻÌsƼȖǋƼŸǣsŸ¯ǼÌÞǣƼǋŸƼŸǣs_ŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼÞǣǼŸ__ǋsǇȖÞǋsŎsŘǼǣǼŸǼÌs NŸŎƼǋsÌsŘǣÞɚs^sɚsĶŸƼŎsŘǼŷǋ_ÞŘŘOsǋs¶ǋ_ÞŘ¶ǋsǼÞŘÞŘ¶ɠĶĶǣɠÌÞOÌsŘOǋŸOÌÞŘǼŸǋsǇȖÞǋs_ Burlington Planning Commission Public Hearing Warning p. 2 ZA-17-14 thru ZA-17-17 and ZA-18-01 ƼǋŸƼsǋǼɴǣsǼEOĨʰ_sǣÞ¶ŘǋsɚÞsɠǣǼŘ_ǋ_ǣ¯ŸǋǋsǼÞŘÞŘ¶ɠĶĶǣʰŘ_ƼǋŸɚÞ_s_s¯ÞŘÞǼÞŸŘǣǼŸ _ÞǣǼÞŘ¶ȖÞǣÌEsǼɠssŘǋsǼÞŘÞŘ¶ɠĶĶǣŘ_ǣsɠĶĶǣʳ x ʉ˚ˠ˧˚˟ˠʲǻÌsƼȖǋƼŸǣsŸ¯ǼÌÞǣŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼÞǣǼŸsǣǼEĶÞǣÌŘsɠǋǼÞOĶsˠˣ˚ƼĶŘDǻə^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘ NŸ_sǼÌǼɠÞĶĶǋs¶ȖĶǼsĶĶ_sɚsĶŸƼŎsŘǼÞŘǼÌs^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘŘ_ɟǼsǋ¯ǋŸŘǼ_ÞǣǼǋÞOǼʰsŎƼÌǣÞʊÞŘ¶ ǼÌsÞŘǼsŘ_s_ƼÌɴǣÞOĶ¯ŸǋŎʰOÌǋOǼsǋŸ¯ƼĶOsʰŘ_OŸŎƼǼÞEÞĶÞǼɴŸ¯ȖǣsǣʳǻÌÞǣŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼ ǋsƼĶOsǣĶĶsɮÞǣǼÞŘ¶ǋs¶ȖĶǼÞŸŘǣƼsǋǼÞŘÞŘ¶ǼŸ_sɚsĶŸƼŎsŘǼÞŘǼÌs^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘʰ^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘ ɟǼsǋ¯ǋŸŘǼʰ^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘǻǋŘǣÞǼÞŸŘŘ_DǼǼsǋɴǢǼǋssǼǻǋŘǣÞǼÞŸŘʊŸŘÞŘ¶_ÞǣǼǋÞOǼǣʳ µsŸ¶ǋƼÌÞOǋsǣ¯¯sOǼs_ʲǼÌsƼǋŸƼŸǣs_ŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼǣǋsƼƼĶÞOEĶsǼŸǼÌs¯ŸĶĶŸɠÞŘ¶ǋsǣÞŘǼÌsNÞǼɴ Ÿ¯DȖǋĶÞŘ¶ǼŸŘʲ x ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠˣʲǻÌs¯ÞǋǣǼƼǋǼŸ¯ǼÌÞǣŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼƼƼĶÞsǣǼŸǼÌsǋsǣŸ¯ǼÌsNÞǼɴʊŸŘs_ŗN˚NŎEǋÞŘ ǊÞǣsʰŘ_ǼÌsǣsOŸŘ_ƼǋǼŸ¯ǼÌÞǣŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼƼƼĶÞsǣǼŸĶĶŗsÞ¶ÌEŸǋÌŸŸ_ʰǢÌǋs_ȕǣsŘ_ ^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘƻǋĨÞŘ¶^ÞǣǼǋÞOǼǣÞŘɠÌÞOÌƼǋsǣOÌŸŸĶǣǋsƼsǋŎÞǼǼs_Ȗǣsʳ x ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠˤʲǻÌÞǣŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼƼƼĶÞsǣǼŸĶĶǋsǣŸ¯ǼÌsNÞǼɴɠÞǼÌÞŘǋsǣÞ_sŘǼÞĶŘ_ŘsÞ¶ÌEŸǋÌŸŸ_ ŎÞɮs_˚ȖǣsʊŸŘÞŘ¶_ÞǣǼǋÞOǼǣʳ x ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠ˥ʲǻÌÞǣŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼƼƼĶÞsǣǼŸǋsǣŸ¯ǼÌsNÞǼɴʊŸŘs_ĶŸɠŘ_Ŏs_ÞȖŎ_sŘǣÞǼɴ ǋsǣÞ_sŘǼÞĶʹǊĵʰǊĵ˚ɟʰǊōʰŘ_Ǌō˚ɟʺɠÌsǋsŎŸEÞĶsÌŸŎsƼǋĨǣǋsƼsǋŎÞǼǼs_ǣNŸŘ_ÞǼÞŸŘĶ ȕǣsʳ x ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠ˦ʲǻÌÞǣŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼƼƼĶÞsǣǼŸĶĶǋsǣŸ¯ǼÌsNÞǼɴʳ x ʉ˚ˠ˧˚˟ˠʲǻÌÞǣŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼƼƼĶÞsǣǼŸĶĶƼǋǼǣŸ¯ǼÌs_ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘŘ_ɠǼsǋ¯ǋŸŘǼǋsƼǋsǣsŘǼĶɴÞŘ ǼÌs^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘʰ^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘɟǼsǋ¯ǋŸŘǼʰ^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘǻǋŘǣÞǼÞŸŘŘ_DǼǼsǋɴǢǼǋssǼǻǋŘǣÞǼÞŸŘʊŸŘÞŘ¶ _ÞǣǼǋÞOǼǣʳ ĵÞǣǼŸ¯ǣsOǼÞŸŘÌs_ÞŘ¶ǣ¯¯sOǼs_ʲ x ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠˣʲǻÌÞǣŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼ__ǣƼǋsǣOÌŸŸĶǣǣƼsǋŎÞǼǼs_ȖǣsɠÞǼÌÞŘƼƼsŘ_Þɮ˚ȕǣsǻEĶs¯Ÿǋ ǼÌsŗN˚NǊ_ÞǣǼǋÞOǼʰŘ___ǣƼǋĨÞŘ¶ǣǼŘ_ǋ_ǣ¯ŸǋƼǋsǣOÌŸŸĶǣɠÞǼÌÞŘǻEĶs˧ʳˠʳ˧˚ˠōÞŘÞŎȖŎŷ¯¯ ǢǼǋssǼƻǋĨÞŘ¶ǊsǇȖÞǋsŎsŘǼǣʳ x ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠˤʲǻÌÞǣŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼŎŸ_Þ¯ÞsǣǻEĶsˣʳˣʳˡ˚ˠʱŘ_ŎsŘ_ǣǼsɮǼÞŘǢsOʳˣʳˣʳˡʳʹ_ʺˢʳʳ ÝŘOĶȖǣÞŸŘǋɴËŸȖǣÞŘ¶ʰǢsOˣʳˣʳˤʳʹ_ʺ˦ʳNʳ_ƼǼÞɚsǊsȖǣsDŸŘȖǣʰǢsOˣʳˣʳˤʳʹ_ʺ˦ʳ^ʳǊsǣÞ_sŘǼÞĶ NŸŘɚsǋǣÞŸŘDŸŘȖǣʰŘ_ǢsOˣʳˣʳˤʳʹ_ʺ˦ʳrʳĵÞŎÞǼǼÞŸŘǣŸŘǊsǣÞ_sŘǼÞĶ^sɚsĶŸƼŎsŘǼDŸŘȖǣsǣʳ x ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠ˥ʲǻÌÞǣŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼŎŸ_Þ¯ÞsǣǼÌsǼsɮǼÞŘǢsOʳˤʳˣʳˠˡōŸEÞĶsËŸŎsƻǋĨǣʳ x ʉ˚ˠ˦˚ˠ˦ʲǻÌÞǣŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼŎŸ_Þ¯ÞsǣǼsɮǼÞŘǢsOʳˤʳˡʳˤʹEʺŘ_ǢsOʳ˥ʳˡʳˡʹŎʺʰŘ___ǣǼɠŸ _s¯ÞŘǼÞŸŘǣǼŸǋǼÞOĶsˠˢ^s¯ÞŘÞǼÞŸŘǣʳ x ʉ˚ˠ˧˚˟ˠʲǻÌÞǣŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼsǣǼEĶÞǣÌsǣŘsɠǋǼÞOĶsˠˣʲƼĶŘDǻəʲ^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘNŸ_sʰɠÌÞOÌ ǋsƼĶOsǣĶĶOȖǋǋsŘǼƼǋŸɚÞǣÞŸŘǣǋs¶ǋ_ÞŘ¶ǼÌs^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘʰ^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘɟǼsǋ¯ǋŸŘǼʰ^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘ ǻǋŘǣÞǼÞŸŘŘ_DǼǼsǋɴǢǼǋssǼʊŸŘÞŘ¶_ÞǣǼǋÞOǼǣʰŘ_ŎsŘ_ǣŸǼÌsǋǣsOǼÞŸŘǣǼŸÞŘOĶȖ_sǼÌs ƼƼǋŸƼǋÞǼsǋs¯sǋsŘOsǣǼŸǼÌsŘsɠǋǼÞOĶsʰÞŘOĶȖ_ÞŘ¶ǼÌs¯ŸĶĶŸɠÞŘ¶ǣsOǼÞŸŘǣʰŎƼǣǼEĶsǣʰŘ_ ¯Þ¶Ȗǋsǣʲ o ŎsŘ_ǣǢsOʳˢʳˡʳˠʹʺʰǢsOˢʳˡʳˡʰǢsOˢʳˡʳˡʹsʺʰǢsOʳˢʳˡʳˢʰǢsOʳˢʳˡʳ˦ʹʺʰǢsOʳˢʳˣʳˡʹEʺʰŘ_ ǢsOʳˢʳˤʳˡʹEʺ o ŎsŘ_ǣǢsOˣʳˢʳˠʹʺŘ_ǢsOʳˣʳˢʳˡʹ¯ʺŘ_ʹ¶ʺʱǢǼǋÞĨsǣǢsOʳˣʳˢʳˡʹÌʺ o ŎsŘ_ǣǢsOˣʳˣʳˠʹʺˠ˚ˢŘ_ǢsOˣʳˣʳˠʹʺˤʱ__ǣŘsɠǢsOˣʳˣʳˠʹʺˠʱŘ_ŎsŘ_ǣǢsO ˣʳˣʳˠʹʺˣʱŎsŘ_ǣǢsOˣʳˣʳˠʹEʺŘ_ǢsOˣʳˣʳˠʹOʺʱŎsŘ_ǣǢsOˣʳˣʳˠʹ_ʺʱŎsŘ_ǣǢsOˣʳˣʳˠ ʹ_ʺ˦ʱŘ_ŎsŘ_ǣǢsOˣʳˣʳˠʹ_ʺ˦N˚r Burlington Planning Commission Public Hearing Warning p. 3 ZA-17-14 thru ZA-17-17 and ZA-18-01 o ǢǼǋÞĨsǣǢsOˣʳˣʳˠʹ_ʺˠʳʱǣǼǋÞĨsǣǢsOˣʳˣʳˠʹ_ʺˣʳ˚NʱǣǼǋÞĨsǣǢsOˣʳˣʳˠʹ_ʺ˥ʱŘ_ǣǼǋÞĨsǣǢsO ˣʳˣʳˠʹ_ʺ˦˚Dʱ o ŎsŘ_ǣǢsOˣʳˤʳˠʹEʺʹˠʺ o ǢǼǋÞĨsǣǢsOˣʳˤʳ˧ÞŘÞǼǣsŘǼÞǋsǼɴ o ŎsŘ_ǣǢsOʳ˥ʳ˟ʳˠ o ŎsŘ_ǣǢsO˦ʳˡʳˢʱǢsO˦ʳˡʳˣˢʳʳʰŘ_ǢsO˦ʳˢʳˡ o ŎsŘ_ǣǢsO˧ʳˠʳˠˡʹEʺŘ_ǢsO˧ʳˠʳˠˤʹʺ o ŎsŘ_ǣǢsO˨ʳˡʳˡ o ŎsŘ_ǣǢsOˠˠʳˠʳˢ o ŎsŘ_ǣǢsOˠˢʳˠʳˡ o ǢǼǋÞĨsǣǼÌs^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘʹ^ʺʰ^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘɟǼsǋ¯ǋŸŘǼʹ^ɟʺʰ^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘǻǋŘǣÞǼÞŸŘʹ^ǻʺŘ_ DǼǼsǋɴǢǼǋssǼǻǋŘǣÞǼÞŸŘʹDǢǻʺ_ÞǣǼǋÞOǼǣŘ_ĶĶȖǣsƼǋŸɚÞǣÞŸŘǣǣǣŸOÞǼs_ɠÞǼÌǼÌsǣs _ÞǣǼǋÞOǼǣ¯ǋŸŎƼƼsŘ_Þɮ˚ȕǣsǻEĶs o ŎsŘ_ǣōƼˣʳˢʳˠʳ˚ˠDǣsʉŸŘÞŘ¶^ÞǣǼǋÞOǼǣʰōƼˣʳˣʳˠ˚ˠ^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘōÞɮs_ȕǣs^ÞǣǼǋÞOǼǣʰ ōƼˣʳˣʳˤ˚ˠǊsǣÞ_sŘǼÞĶʉŸŘÞŘ¶^ÞǣǼǋÞOǼǣʰōƼˣʳˣʳˤ˚ˡɟǼsǋ¯ǋŸŘǼǊōËsÞ¶ÌǼrɮOsƼǼÞŸŘǣʰ Ř_ōƼˣʳˤʳˠ˚ˠ^sǣÞ¶ŘǊsɚÞsɠŷɚsǋĶɴʱ o ǢǼǋÞĨsǣōƼˣʳˤʳ˧˚ˠ^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘōÞɮs_ȕǣsNŸǋsŷɚsǋĶɴʹ^ōȕNʺ^ÞǣǼǋÞOǼ o ŎsŘ_ǣǻEĶsˣʳˣʳˠ˚ˠ^ÞŎsŘǣÞŸŘĶǢǼŘ_ǋ_ǣŘ_ÝŘǼsŘǣÞǼɴŘ_ǻEĶsˣʳˣʳˠ˚ˡōɮÞŎȖŎ ®ǊŘ_DȖÞĶ_ÞŘ¶ËsÞ¶ÌǼǣɠÞǼÌDŸŘȖǣsǣʱ o ǢǼǋÞĨsǣǻEĶsˣʳˤʳ˧˚ˠ^ŸɠŘǼŸɠŘōÞɮs_ȕǣsNŸǋsŷɚsǋĶɴʹ^ōȕNʺ^ÞǣǼǋÞOǼ^ÞŎsŘǣÞŸŘĶ ǢǼŘ_ǋ_ǣ o ŎsŘ_ǣǻEĶs˦ʳˡʳˠ˚ˠǢÞ¶ŘǊs¶ȖĶǼÞŸŘǢȖŎŎǋɴ o ŎsŘ_ǣǻEĶs˨ʳˠʳ˧˚ˠÝŘOĶȖǣÞŸŘǋɴʉŸŘÞŘ¶ƻsǋOsŘǼ¶sǣ o ŎsŘ_ǣǻEĶs˨ʳˠʳˠˡ˚ˠ^sŘǣÞǼɴˀÝŘǼsŘǣÞǼɴĶĶŸɠŘOsǻEĶs o ǢǼǋÞĨsǣ®Þ¶ȖǋsˣʳˣʳˠʳˠƻǋÞŘOÞƼĶəÞsɠNŸǋǋÞ_ŸǋȕƼƼsǋǢǼŸǋɴǢsǼEOĨǣʰ®Þ¶Ȗǋsˣʳˣʳˠʳˡ ōsǣȖǋÞŘ¶ËsÞ¶ÌǼĵÞŎÞǼǣ¯ŸǋNÌȖǋOÌǢǼǋssǼDȖÞĶ_ÞŘ¶ǣʰŘ_®Þ¶ȖǋsˣʳˣʳˠʳˢǢÞ_sǢǼǋssǼ DȖÞĶ_ÞŘ¶ËsÞ¶ÌǼǢsǼEOĨǣ ǻÌs¯ȖĶĶǼsɮǼŸ¯ǼÌsDȖǋĶÞŘ¶ǼŸŘNŸŎƼǋsÌsŘǣÞɚs^sɚsĶŸƼŎsŘǼŷǋ_ÞŘŘOsŘ_ǼÌsƼǋŸƼŸǣs_ŎsŘ_ŎsŘǼÞǣ ɚÞĶEĶs¯ŸǋǋsɚÞsɠǼǼÌs^sƼǋǼŎsŘǼŸ¯ƻĶŘŘÞŘ¶Ř_ʉŸŘÞŘ¶ʰNÞǼɴËĶĶʰˠˣ˨NÌȖǋOÌǢǼǋssǼʰDȖǋĶÞŘ¶ǼŸŘ ōŸŘ_ɴǼÌǋŸȖ¶Ì®ǋÞ_ɴ˧ʲ˟˟ʳŎʳǼŸˣʲˢ˟ƼʳŎʳŸǋŸŘǼÌs_sƼǋǼŎsŘǼ˅ǣɠsEǣÞǼsǼ ɠɠɠʳEȖǋĶÞŘ¶ǼŸŘɚǼʳ¶ŸɚˀƼʊʳ