Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Minutes - Development Review Board - 08/01/2017
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 1 AUGUST 2017 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 1 August 2017, at 7:00 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. MEMBERS PRESENT: B. Miller, Chair; J. Smith, D. Parsons, J. Wilking, M. Behr (via telephone) ALSO PRESENT: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; P. Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning; M. Keene, Development Planner; K. Dorn, City Manager; C. Snyder, J. Painter, C. Bady, A. Kestner, P. Judge, K. Braverman, B. Rushford, L. O’Brien, Jr., M. O’Brien, E. Langfeldt, A. Gill, S. Homsted, J. Goodwin, J. Fayette, T. Chittenden, L. Clavelle 1. Directions on emergency evacuation procedures from conference room: Mr. Miller provided directions on emergency evacuation procedures. 2. Additions, deletions, or changes in order of agenda items: No changes were made to the Agenda. 3. Comments & Questions from the public not related to the Agenda: No issues were raised. 4. Announcements: Mr. Conner introduced Marla Keene, the new Development Planner 5. Discuss and possibly decide request to continue hearing on Appeal #AO-17-03 of Century Partners, LP, and Thirty Three Mary Street, LLC, appealing site plan approval #SP-17-29 from the August 15, 2017 meeting to a future meeting: Mr. Conner indicated that he will serve as the Board’s resource in this matter as it is an appeal of Mr. Belair’s decision. Mr. Conner explained that the appeal had been scheduled pursuant to state law. The appellant has asked for the appeal hearing to be continued. The developer opposes this. The DRB is now being asked whether to grant the continuance. Mr. Kestner, representing the appellant, said that Mark Sperry, the attorney who has been handling this matter, is on vacation through the week of 14 August. He would be able to be present for the following 2 DRB meetings. Mr. Rushford, representing the developers, said they are not trying to be difficult. They have been working with Mr. Judge regarding his requests, and they oppose the delay. It is their feeling that the appeal could be handled by another attorney in the firm. He added that they were close to settling with Mr. Sperry before he left for vacation. The hope is to resolve the issues so there would be no need for a hearing. He also added that if this keeps on being delayed, there will be no motivation to settle. Mr. Rushford enumerated the concessions made to the appellant to date including moving entirely onto city property, increasing the width of the road, moving the building and building the road all at the developers’ expense. Mr. Kestner said he didn’t know any other attorneys in the firm working on this case. Mr. Dorn noted that it is unusual for a City Manager to appear before the DRB; however, the city has a significant interest in this development including a Community Development Block Grant ($600,000) and the support of low income tax credits. The project is in the city’s TIF district, and under the rules, the city has 20 years in which to accumulate funds for infrastructure. The TIF has been activated, and the city now has 5 years in which to accumulate debt. Every day that goes by the city loses money. The city’s position is to expedite this appeal. The city is also aiming for a vote at the March annual meeting, and every day that delays an RFP delays the ability to present information to the public about what is to be built in City Center. That information needs to go to the public before January. Mr. Snyder said they had been assured of a speedy review process, and the appeal was made on the last day possible. They did submit a settlement outline 2 weeks ago, but they have had no response. He felt that the remaining issues are “small minutia” involving Mary Street, not the building. Mr. Kestner said they would be open to a special meeting at an earlier date after Mr. Sperry’s return. Mr. Judge said Mr. Sperry has been on the site and at other proceedings involving access to the site. He said that City Center was premised on Mary Street being a connector, and they have a question as to whether the Form Based Code precludes that. He felt it would be unfair to have to bring in new counsel. He felt a continuance of a few days would be reasonable. Board members and the developer were willing to consider a special meeting and agreed on 24 August as an acceptable date. Formal action on this date will take place at the meeting of 15 August. 6. Director of Planning & Zoning review of new LCR Amendments: Mr. Conner said the most obvious amendments relate to bicycle parking standards. The regulations now provide specific types of acceptable bike racks (to meet the national standard). Pictures were show of what is and is not allowable. There are also standards for the number of bike parking spaces. In certain cases, long-terms bicycle parking spaces and indoor showers are required (new construction or if more than 50% of building verticals are taken down in a rebuild). Mr. Conner noted that work on these amendments was done by the Bike/Ped Committee and Planning Commission. Mr. Conner then reviewed setback changes on Williston Road to 100 feet. In another amendment, affordable housing is now allowed in the “swap piece” in the J. M. Golf settlement. In addition, market rate units in the Southeast Quadrant must have affordable units; those using TDRs do not have to. Regarding the discrepancy in the regulations regarding the 200-foot road limitation and the requirement to build to the property line, there are now review criteria for when it is reasonable that future development will take place on the adjacent property so that a road can be longer than 200 feet. Ms. Smith asked if it is reasonable to limit the development to the first 200 feet. Mr. Conner said the Wildflower Lane development was designed to connect to the property line. It would have been difficult for the first developer to build only to the first 200 feet. Mr. Wilking wasn’t sure this solves all the issues. Mr. Conner noted there will be a joint meeting of the Planning Commission and DRB later in the year, and this will be a good topic for discussion. Mr. Wilking suggested allowing development only on the first 200 feet, and then if there is a later connection, to allow more development. Other amendments include: allowing front porches in the R-4 district (per a request from the Chamberlin Neighborhood Committee), following state law regarding deliberative sessions, following state law regarding advisory committee feedback, removing agricultural standards that did not fall under local regulatory power, allowing for “food hubs,” amending the official map to allow for a rec path connection between San Remo Drive and Barrett Street instead of a road, and minor technical corrections. Mr. Conner said a time will be set to discuss footprint lots. 7. Final Plat Application #SD-17-17 of O’Brien Farm Road, LLC, for a planned unit development on 39.16 acres consisting of: 1) 64 single family dwellings, 2) 27 two-family dwellings, and 3) 14 lots, 255 Kennedy Drive: Mr. Langfeldt said they appreciate staff working with them on some complex issues. They have met with City department who (e.g., Public Works, Stormwater) have signed off on everything. Mr. Gill said the roads and layout haven’t changed in any substantial way. All roads have been named. They have also provided an easement (20 feet) to the city over the stormwater pipe, and have added and/or removed trees. Mr. Langfeldt added that they have added connection to Old Farm Road as requested by staff. Members were OK with the housing mix and phasing plan. They also had no issues with the proposed waivers. Members were OK with granting a credit for impact fees because of the proposed improvements. Mr. Gill explained that the proposed park on Old Farm Road is on the list of what impact fees can be used for, and the city feels their proposed park meets the requirement for recreation on that road. Regarding the Fire Department comment, Mr. Gill clarified the issue on Laurentide Lane where there is an existing hydrant. Members were OK with this, and Mr. Belair will check with Deputy Chief Francis to determine the exact language. No other Board or public issues were raised. Mr. Wilking moved to close #SD-17-17. Ms. Smith seconded. Motion passed 5-0. 8. Minutes of 18 July 2017: Mr. Wilking moved to approve the Minutes of 18 July 2017 as written. Ms. Smith seconded. Motion passed 5-0. 9. Other Business: There was no other business. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned by common consent at 8:00 p.m. , Clerk ________8/15/17____________________, Date Published by ClerkBase ©2019 by Clerkbase. No Claim to Original Government Works. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Paul Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning RE: Appeal #AO-17-03 of Century Partners LP & Thirty-Three Mary Street LLC (regarding 146 Market Street) DATE: August 1, 2017 Development Review Board meeting Enclosed with this memo you will find a request from Mark Sperry at Langrock Sperry & Wool, LLP, on behalf of his clients to continue Appeal #AO-17-03 from its scheduled August 15th date to a future meeting. The applicant, Snyder-Braverman Development Corporation, LLC, does not concur with this request and wishes for the appeal to be heard as scheduled on August 15th. In light of this disagreement, Bill Miller, DRB Chair, has agreed to place this discussion and determination of the appeal hearing schedule on this agenda. Background: Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer for the City, issued #SP-17-29 for the construction of a 58,551 sq. ft. four (4) story mixed-use building which includes 39 residential units at 146 Market Street on June 22nd. This project is in the City Center Form Based Codes T4 District which allows for site plans to be reviewed and approved administratively. The Administrative Officer’s decision was appealed on July 6th by an abutting property owner. Pursuant to 24 V.S.A. §4465-4468, appeals of decisions issued by the Administrative Officer are appealable to the Development Review Board, and shall set a date and place for the hearing that shall be within 60 days of the filing of the notice of appeal. As with other DRB applications, the Board may continue such a hearing to future dates subsequent to the first date. August 1st discussion As noted above, the DRB chair has placed an item on the agenda to hear parties’ discussions regarding the date of the appeal hearing. Please note: discussion under this item should be limited strictly to the scheduling of the appeal hearing and any information the Board deems necessary in order to make a decision regarding scheduling. The public notice for the appeal itself is dated for August 15th. At this meeting, the Board is encouraged to make a determination of the date that the merits of the appeal will be presented. The Board may elect to: a) Keep the appeal date of August 15, 2017, b) Agree to a continuance to a future scheduled DRB meeting date, or c) Agree to a continuance to a future special DRB meeting date. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com July 28, 2017 Mark Sperry Langrock Sperry & Wool, LLP 210 College Street PO Box 721, Burlington, VT 05402 Robert H. Rushford Gravel & Shea PC 76 St. Paul Street, 7th Floor PO Box 369, Burlington, VT 05402 re: Scheduling of Development Review Board Hearing on Appeal #AO-17-03, Century Partners, LP & Thirty-Three Mary Street, LLC, Dear Attorneys Sperry & Rushford, A Public Hearing on Appeal #AO-17-03 has been warned for August 15, 2017 before the Development Review Board in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4465-4468. On July 26, 2017, the City received a request from Mark Sperry on behalf of his clients, Century Partners, LP and Thirty Three Mary Street LLC, for the appeal hearing to be recessed [continued] to a later date. The applicant, Snyder-Braverman Development Company, LLC, does not concur with this request. Therefore, the Development Review Board chair has agreed to include a review and discussion by the parties of this request in the Board’s agenda for its August 1st meeting. By doing so on August 1st, the Board will afford all parties the opportunity to prepare for the appeal hearing with sufficient notification on the subject of the continuance. The Board’s August 1st discussion on this item will be limited only to the question of the continuance request, and not the substance of the appeal. This has been scheduled to the first substantive item on the Board’s meeting, which begins at 7:00 pm. Should you have any questions regarding this process, please contact me. Sincerely, Paul Conner, AICP Director of Planning & Zoning (over…) Enclosures cc: Bill Miller, Chair, DRB Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer Chris Snyder Ken Braverman Tim McKenzie delivered via email 1 Paul Conner From:Chris Snyder <csnyder@snyderhomesvt.com> Sent:Friday, July 28, 2017 7:22 AM To:Paul Conner Cc:Ken Braverman (kenneth.braverman@gmail.com) Subject:Cathedral Square Appeal Paul, We understand your thought process to have the DRB discuss the request by Mark Sperry. Our perspective is that the DRB should not grant this request and that Mark Sperry should be able to find someone in his office that can cover the hearing. We will be at the hearing on Tuesday night and will express our position. Chris Snyder | PRESIDENT SNYDER HOMES | SnyderHomesVT.com | 802.985.5722 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Paul Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning SUBJECT: Summary of Amendments to the LDRs & Official Map Effective July 10, 2017 DATE: August 1, 2017 Development Review Board meeting The City Council earlier this summer adopted a series of amendments to the Land Development Regulations, following development, review, and public hearings held by the Planning Commission. Below is a summary of these amendments, and enclosed as an easy-reference is a “red-line” version of the amendments themselves. The updated Land Development Regulations are available online at www.sburl.com/regulations. Staff will attend the DRB’s August 1st meeting to provide a short presentation on these amendments. Summary of Amendments Effective July 10, 2017: (A) Update requirements for bicycle racks, and establish bicycle storage and shower facility requirements; (B) Expand the planned right of way for Williston Road between I-89 and Hinesburg Road and establishment of a planned right-of-way for Market Street; (C) Permit an affordable housing density bonus in the Southeast Quadrant Neighborhood Residential North sub-district, clarify applicability of transferable development rights in affordable housing density bonus housing units within the Southeast Quadrant district; and correct section references for the affordable housing density bonus; (D) Revise standards of review for when street connections are required citywide and enact limitations on lengths of cul-de-sacs in the Southeast Quadrant; (E) Remove redundant lists of allowable uses in the Municipal, Parks & Recreation, R7-Neighborhood Commercial, and Institutional-Agricultural districts and clarify where the lists did not match; (F) Allow unenclosed front porches to extend into the front yard setback for principal buildings in the R4 District; (G) Update Planning Commission (PC) and Development Review Board (DRB)authorization, powers & duties, and membership to reference State Law and/or the City Charter, and expand the authorization for the Design Review Committee as an advisory committee to all advisory committees and update the section as described above for the PC and DRB; 2 (H) Remove agricultural uses that are exempted by State Law, create and define a new use called “Food Hub”, and allow “Food Hub” in the IA, PR, MU, R7, R12, SEQ-NRP, SEQ-NRT, SEQ-NR, SEQ-VR, SEQ- VC, and C1-R12, C1-R15, C1-Auto, C1-LR, AR, SW, IO, C2, and IC districts; (I) Replace the planned street connection between Barrett Street and San Remo Drive with a planned recreation path, add a planned street extending north from Barrett Street, and label the new planned street as a “neighborhood narrow” street type; and, (J) Correct section references, eliminating descriptions of where certain zoning districts are located, add section labels, correct typographical errors, and remove redundant density and dimensional standards in the C1-Auto, C1-LR Allen Road, and Swift Street district and location of parking in the C1-Auto and C1-Air districts Purposes of the Official Map amendments (A) Addition of a planned right of way along Market Street, (B) Addition of a planned street extending north from Barrett Street, and (C) Change from planned street to planned recreation path between San Remo Drive and Barrett Street. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Proposed Amendments to South Burlington Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for Monday, June 19, 2017 Index to amendments: Numbered Headings – descriptors of amendment topics Proposed additions red and underlined [or as noted in red boxes on maps & illustrations] Proposed deletions red and strikethrough Notes for users: In Bold Red underlined Table of contents for the draft amendments: 1. End-of-Trip Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities (bike racks, bike storage, showers) ................................................... 1 2. Planned Rights of Way – Expansion of Williston Road and Addition of Market Street ........................................ 4 3. Affordable Housing Bonus in the SEQ (add SEQ-NRN subdistrict, clarify existing language) ............................... 5 4. Standards for determining applicability of required street connections & allowable cul-de-sacs ....................... 6 5. Remove redundant lists and clarify uses permitted in the Institutional-Agricultural district, Municipal District, Recreation & Parks District, and Residential 7-Neighborhood Commercial District ..................................................... 8 6. Allow Unclosed Front Porches to Extend into Principal Building Setback in the R4 District .............................. 12 7. Update Planning Commission, Development Review Board, and Advisory Committees authorization, powers, duties, and membership .............................................................................................................................................. 13 8. Remove Agricultural Uses Exempt by State Law, Create New Food Hub Use allowed in certain districts ......... 16 9. Replace planned street connection between Barrett Street and San Remo Drive with recreation path, add new planned dead-end street north from Barrett Street ............................................................................................ 17 10. Technical corrections, formatting and typos .................................................................................................. 18 1. End-of-Trip Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities (bike racks, bike storage, showers) 2.02 Definitions … Long Term Bicycle Storage. Also called protected bicycle storage. Bicycle parking spaces intended for employees, tenants, and their visitors and intended to provide a high degree of security and protection from the weather when a bicycle is unattended for a period of time in excess of four hours. Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 2 Short Term Bicycle Parking. Also called bicycle parking. Bicycle parking spaces to accommodate customers, patients, employees, clients, and those biking to those locations to do business. 13.14 [reserved] Bicycle Parking and Storage A. Purpose. These standards for short term parking and long term storage of bicycles are intended to recognize and promote cycling as a viable means of transportation and recreation for residents, consumers, visitors, and employees. B. Short Term Bicycle Parking (1) Applicability. These standards apply to any application for development that requires site plan approval under Section 14.03 of the LDRs, and all applications for development of parcels located in the City Center Form Based Codes District. (a) In order to facilitate a reasonable nexus between land development and bicycle parking requirements, applications for development to which these standards apply on parcels with existing development shall be permitted to phase in required short term bicycle parking as follows: (i) For the first application, the applicant shall propose and install at least 50% of the required number of bicycle parking spaces. (ii) Thereafter, any applications for development of the same parcel shall comply with all standards for Short Term Bicycle Parking. (2) Standards for bicycle parking spaces (bps). (a) The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces shall be as indicated on Table 13-10. (b) Bicycle parking shall utilize the ‘Inverted U’ style or as shown as acceptable in Appendix G. (c) If an applicant wishes to install something different, any bps shall meet the following specifications: (i) Allow secure locking of the frame and wheel; (ii) Support a bicycle frame at two points of contact; (iii) Meet the intent of the examples provided in Appendix G. (d) Location & Serviceability. Each bps shall be: (i) Securely anchored to the ground and on a paved surface of at least 2x6 feet; (ii) Spaced to allow easy access to each bicycle and spaced at least 24 inches from obstructions, including walls, doors, posts, columns or landscaping; (iii) Easily accessible from the street or multi-use path and protected from motor vehicles; Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 3 (iv) Visible to passers-by and well-lit to promote usage and enhance security; especially in retrofitted areas, or where good visibility is not achievable, an applicant may be required to install directional signage. (v) Located at principal entrances where reasonably practicable. (vi) Where existing vehicle parking is replaced with bicycle parking in accordance with Section 13.01, note 6, bicycle parking must still meet the standards herein and shall be safely separated from vehicle parking spaces using striping, bollards, islands or other similar measures deemed adequate by the reviewing party. (e) Bicycle parking serving buildings with multiple entrances shall be dispersed so that all principal entrances are served. (f) For office building use, up to 50% of short term bicycle parking requirements may be met by supplementing the (indoor) long term bicycle parking requirements with the required short term bicycle parking spaces. C. Long Term Bicycle Storage (1) Applicability. These standards apply to: (a) Construction of new mixed use or commercial buildings and any new residential building with more than 3 dwelling units; (b) Structural alterations involving the replacement, relocation, or removal of, or other similar changes to, more than 50% of all load bearing walls shall require compliance with all standards for long term bicycle storage. (c) Building additions of more than 5,000 gross square feet in area. (2) Standards (a) For Residential Buildings (i) Secure Storage in bicycle locker, bicycle storage room or private enclosure outside of the private residence that protects entire bicycle, including components and accessories against theft and weather. (ii) Garages which are private to each unit may count towards parking requirements. (b) For Non-Residential Buildings (i) Secure storage in bicycle locker, bicycle storage room or enclosure that protects entire bicycle, including components and accessories against theft and weather; (ii) Where indicated in Table 13-11, clothes lockers shall be lockable with the following dimensions: minimum 12” wide, 18” deep, 36” high. Lockers do not need to be in same place as bicycle storage; (iii) Secure office space (private offices, common space with ability to lock bicycles, etc.) may account for up to 50% of the required indoor parking areas and lockers; Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 4 (iv) Shower and changing facilities dependent on the number of bicycles required to be stored and as indicated on Table 13-10. Table 13-10. Bicycle Parking Requirements Type of Activity Short Term Bike Parking Long Term Bike Storage Residential buildings with more than 3 units 1 for every 10 units; minimum 41 1 for every unit Warehousing, contractor, and light industry 1 per 20k SF; minimum 2 2 per tenant Retail, restaurant, office, and all other 1 per 5k SF; minimum 4 50% of required short term bike parking spaces. Educational 1 space for each 20 students of planned capacity. For new buildings only, one space for each 20 employees. 1 May request waiver from minimum per building for buildings with less than 6 units if Development Review Board finds the need is adequately met for visitors. Table 13-11. Long Term parking – shower and changing room facility requirements Number of protected long term bicycle parking spaces Changing facility Unisex Showers Clothes Lockers 1-3 none none 1 4 – 9 12 12 3 For every 10 12 12 40% of LTB parking 2 if unisex, units available to any gender; otherwise provide one per gender Notes applicable to Tables 13-1 through 13-6: 1. If all parking spaces are common, i.e. non-reserved, and if there are more than 10 DUs, the requirement decreases to 2 spaces per DU 2. Any spaces required as part of the operational function, such as display, storage or queuing spaces at the transfer station or service station, are in addition 3. Add 3 per 1,000 SF GFA for retail areas plus 3.5 per 1,000 SF GFA for office space 4. Parking need varies according to type of facility and will be determined during site plan approval 5. For the City Center FBC District (Article 8), these tables do not apply. See applicable Transect Zone Building Envelope Standards 6. Bicycle parking may substitute for up to 25% of required parking. For every five required bicycle parking spaces that meet the short or long term bicycle parking standards, the motor vehicle parking requirement is reduced by one space. Existing parking may be converted to take advantage of this provision 2. Planned Rights of Way – Expansion of Williston Road and Addition of Market Street Table 3-1 Existing and Planned Street Rights-of-Way Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 5 Street Existing Street ROW (feet) Minimum Planned Street ROW (feet) Airport Drive 66 80 Airport Parkway 66 66 Allen Road 66 66 Dorset Street, north of Swift 66 100 Dorset Street, south of Swift 66 66 Hinesburg Road 66 80 Kennedy Drive 100 100 Kimball Avenue 100 100 Market Street 80 80 Patchen Road 66 66 Shelburne Road 100 100 Shunpike Road, east of Kimball Avenue 80 80 Spear Street 66 66 Swift Street 50 66 Williston Road, east of the Hinesburg Road-Patchen Road intersection 66 90 Williston Road, from the Hinesburg-Patchen Road intersection west 66 90 100 3. Affordable Housing Bonus in the SEQ (add SEQ-NRN subdistrict, clarify existing language) 9.05 Residential Density … C. Affordable Housing Density Increase. (1) Affordable housing bonuses pursuant to Section 13.14 18.02 are allowed in the SEQ- NR, SEQ-NRN, SEQ-NRT, SEQ-VR, and SEQ-VC sub-districts. If affordable housing, as defined in Article 2 and regulated in Article 18 13 of these Regulations, is proposed as part of an application for development application, the Development Review Board may grant a density increase in any of the eligible SEQ sub-districts according to the requirements of Section 13.14 18.02. (2) Calculation of the allowed density increase (i.e. 25% or 50% per Section 13.14 18.02) shall be based on the maximum allowable overall density of the project as a whole, including non-contiguous sending parcels where applicable. If a development plan is approved by the Development Review Board meeting, the applicable average density may be increased on the development parcel sufficient to accommodate the affordable housing units. (3) In addition, the Development Review Board may allow a residential structure in SEQ-VR and SEQ-VC to have two additional dwelling units per structure, up to a maximum of eight (8) dwelling units per structure, if one or more of the units in the Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 6 structure is an affordable unit. In the SEQ-VR and SEQ-VC sub-districts, the Development Review Board may allow residential structures containing one or more affordable dwelling units to have two additional dwelling units, up to a maximum of eight (8) dwelling units per structure. This provision shall not be interpreted to allow an increase in the total allowable number of units for the project as a whole. (4) When an affordable housing density increase is granted in accordance with this Section and Section 18.02, the designated affordable dwelling units shall not constitute units for the purposes of calculation of Transferable Development Rights. 4. Standards for determining applicability of required street connections & allowable cul-de-sacs 9.08 SEQ-NRT, SEQ-NR, and SEQ-NRN Sub-Districts; Specific Standards A. Street, block and lot pattern. … (2) Interconnection of Streets (a) Average spacing between intersections shall be 300 to 500 feet. (b) Dead end streets (e.g. cul de sac or hammer-head) that are not constructed to an adjacent parcel to allow for a future connection are strongly discouraged. Such Ddead end streets shall not exceed 200 feet in length. (c) Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4). (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section 15.12(D)(4) of these Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly encouraged. (4 3) Lot ratios. Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1:2.5 to 1:5 recommended. 9.09 SEQ-VR Sub-District; Specific Standards A. Street, Block and Lot Pattern (1) Interconnection of Streets (a) Average spacing between intersections shall be 300 to 500 feet. (b) Dead end streets (e.g. cul de sac or hammer-head) that are not constructed to an adjacent parcel to allow for a future connection are strongly discouraged. Such Ddead end streets shall not exceed 200 feet in length. (c) Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4). Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 7 (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section 15.12(D)(4) of these Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly encouraged. (4 3) Lot ratios. Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1:2.5 to 1:5 recommended. 9.10 SEQ-VC Sub-District; Specific Regulations A. Street, block and lot pattern. (2) Interconnection of Streets (a) Average intersection spacing shall be 200 to 300 feet. (b) Dead end streets (e.g. cul de sacs or hammer-heads) that are not constructed to an adjacent parcel to allow for a future connection are strongly discouraged. Such D dead end streets shall not exceed 200 feet in length. (c) Street stubs are required at dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per Section 15.12(D)(4). (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line per Section 15.12(D)(4) of these Regulations to allow connection to adjacent parcels. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly encouraged. (4 3) Lot ratios. Lots for new residential structures shall incorporate a minimum lot width to lot depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1:2.5 to 1:5 recommended. 15.12 Standards for Roadways, Parking and Circulation … D. Criteria for Public and Private Roadways. … (4) Connections to adjacent parcels. (a) If the DRB finds that a roadway or recreation path extension or connection to an adjacent property may or could occur in the future, whether through City action or development of an adjacent parcel, the DRB shall require the applicant to construct the connector roadway to the property line or contribute to the full cost of completing the roadway connection. (b) In determining whether a connection to an adjacent property may or could occur, and the location and configuration of such connection, the DRB may consider: (i) The existence of planned roadways or recreation paths in the City’s Comprehensive Plan, Official Map, or these Regulations; (ii) The requirements of the Zoning District in which the adjacent property is located and whether these Regulations allow additional development or development density on the adjacent parcel; Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 8 (iii) The context of the proposed development’s setting in relation to the adjacent property; (iv) The presence of physical obstacles to such a connection, such as wetlands, water bodies, or steep slopes; (v) The presence of legal restrictions to development or use on the adjacent property; and/or; (vi) Any other information it deems necessary to make its determination. (c) If the DRB finds that a roadway or recreation path connection to an adjacent property may or could occur, but the maximum allowed length of the proposed dead end street will not connect the roadway or recreation path to the adjacent property, the DRB may accept a dedication of a right-of-way to the property line and/or impose a condition that any future development on the property requires construction of the roadway or recreation path to the property line. (ad) In any such application, the DRB shall require For roadway connections, sSufficient right-of-way shall be to be dedicated to accommodate two (2) lanes of vehicle travel, City utilities, and a ten-foot wide grade-separated recreation path. For independent recreation path connections, a right-of-way with a minimum width of twenty feet (20’) is required. (e) Any such roadway or recreation path shall include one or more signs indicating the intent to construct future connections to the street or recreation path. (5) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the authority of the DRB to grant waivers of public roadway standards subject to the provisions of §15.12(D)(4). 5. Remove redundant lists and clarify uses permitted in the Institutional-Agricultural district, Municipal District, Recreation & Parks District, and Residential 7-Neighborhood Commercial District 4.06 RESIDENTIAL 7 WITH NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT - R7-NC … C. Permitted and Conditional Uses. Those uses indicated in Table C-1, Table of Uses, and accessory uses to those uses. (1) Residential as principal permitted uses as per Residential 7 District regulations and accessory dwelling units as conditional uses. (2) Office (3) Medical office (4) Retail, not including shopping centers or general merchandise stores (5) Gasoline filling station with consumer convenience center (6) Personal service establishment (7) Retail food establishment, not to exceed 5,000 square feet in gross floor area Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 9 (8) Accessory uses customary to the uses listed above 7.01 Institutional and Agricultural District I-A … C. Uses. In the Institutional and Agricultural District, principal permitted uses and conditional uses shall be those shown in Table C-1, Table of Uses. C. Permitted Uses. The following uses are permitted in the Institutional- Agricultural District. (1) Agriculture, forestry and horticultural uses (ALL) (2) Retail sale of agricultural, forest or horticultural products produced on site. Such use shall be subject to site plan review in accordance with Article 14 of these Regulations. (ALL) (3) Keeping of livestock (ALL) (4) Single-family dwelling related to agriculture, forestry or horticultural use (ALL) (5) Additional dwelling units for farm employees, subject to site plan review in accordance with Article 14 of these Regulations. (ALL) (6) Park (ALL) (7) Recreation path, subject to site plan review in accordance with Article 14 of these Regulations. (ALL) (8) Hospice (ALL) (9) Educational facility with customary educational support facilities, reviewed as a Planned Unit Development in accordance with Article 15 of these Regulations, and including without limitation the following uses in conjunction with a principal educational facility use: (a) Cultural facility (ALL) (b) Group quarters (ALL) (c) Office (ALL) (d) Medical office (ALL) (e) Place of worship (ALL) (f) Recreation facility, indoor (NORTH ONLY) (g) Recreation facility, outdoor (NORTH ONLY) (h) Research facility or laboratory (ALL) (i) Photocopy and printing shop with accessory retail sales (NORTH ONLY) (j) Personal service. Use is limited to 5,000 SF GFA per tenant with a maximum of 15,000 SF GFA total footprint for the building. Tenants shall have separate entrances from one another and no direct passageways from one to another. (NORTH ONLY) (k) Short-order restaurant, within a principal permitted structure (NORTH ONLY) (l) Retail sales. Use is limited to 5,000 SF GFA per tenant with a maximum of 15,000 SF GFA total footprint for the building. Tenants shall have separate entrances from one another and no direct passageways from one to another. (NORTH ONLY) (m) Social services (NORTH ONLY) (n) Accessory uses to the uses listed above in the applicable district (i.e. North only or all) D. Conditional Uses. The following uses are allowed in the Institutional-Agricultural District as conditional uses subject to approval by the Development Review Board as a Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 10 Planned Unit Development in accordance with the provisions of this Section 7.01 and Table C-2, Dimensional Standards. (1) Accessory residential dwelling units (2) Day care facility (3) Municipal building (4) Parking facility (NORTH ONLY) (5) Public utility substation and transmission lines (6) Group home (7) Cemetery (8) Accessory uses to the uses listed above in the applicable district (i.e. North only or all) D E. Area, Density and Dimensional Requirements. In the Institutional-Agricultural District, all requirements of this Section 7.01 and Table C-2, Dimensional Standards shall apply. E F. Additional Standards. All applications within this District shall be subject to the following additional standards: (1) For properties in the Institutional-Agricultural district west of Spear Street and north of Quarry Hill Road, an undeveloped area shall be maintained for a minimum of sixty-five (65) feet between the boundary of any adjacent residential zoning district and any new non-residential structure. The DRB may require landscaping or other suitable screening in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.06 of these Regulations to ensure adequate buffering between new non-residential structures and adjacent residential districts. (2) For all other properties in the Institutional-Agricultural district, an undeveloped area shall be maintained for a minimum of one hundred (100) feet between the boundary of any adjacent residential zoning district. The yard shall be kept free of buildings, structures, parking lots and facilities, and access drives other than those required to cross through the required yard. The DRB may require landscaping or other suitable screening in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.06 of these Regulations to ensure adequate buffering between new non-residential structures and adjacent residential districts. (3) Educational facilities and educational support facilities in the Commercial 1 district shall be subject to the dimensional standards and requirements of the Institutional-Agricultural North district. (4) Educational Support Facility. Any Educational Support Facility shall be designed and intended to function as a complement to the intended educational use of the property. Such uses shall be secondary to the principal educational use of the property and shall be intended to principally serve students, faculty, and staff of the educational use. 7.02 Park and Recreation District PR … C. Uses. In the Parks and Recreation District, principal permitted uses and conditional uses shall be those shown in Table C-1, Table of Uses. Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 11 C. Permitted Uses. The following uses are permitted in the Park and Recreation District. (1) Agriculture, forestry and horticultural uses (2) Retail sale of agricultural, forest or horticultural products produced on site. Such use shall be subject to site plan review in accordance with Article 14 of these Regulations. (3) Keeping of livestock (4) Park (5) Single-family dwelling related to agriculture, forestry or horticultural use (6) Additional dwelling units for farm employees, subject to site plan review in accordance with Article 14 of these Regulations. (7) Recreation path (8) Indoor recreation facility (9) Outdoor recreation facility (10) Not-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is the provision of educational or research services related to agriculture, horticulture, forestry, natural resource preservation, arts or recreation. D. Conditional Uses. The following uses are allowed in the Park and Recreation District as conditional uses subject to approval by the Development Review Board as a Planned Unit Development in accordance with the provisions of this Section 7.02 and Table C-1, Table of Uses. (1) Public utility substation and transmission lines (2) Day care center (3) Accessory residential dwelling units D E. Area, Density and Dimensional Requirements. In the Park and Recreation District, all requirements of this Section 7.02 and Table C-2, Dimensional Standards shall apply. E F. Additional Standards. All applications within this District shall be subject to the following additional standardsIn reviewing any Permitted or Conditional Use proposed under this Section shall meet the following standards in addition to those in Article 14 of these Regulations: (1) The proposed use will provide an affirmative public benefit to the City and its citizens. (2) The proposed use will be compatible with and protect the ability to preserve public recreational use and planned open spaces and natural areas on the project site. (3) The proposed use will include areas that may be used or accessed by the general public. 7.03 Municipal District MU … C. Uses. In the Municipal District, principal permitted uses and conditional uses shall be those shown in Table C-1, Table of Uses. C. Permitted Uses. The following uses are permitted in the Municipal District: Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 12 (1) Agriculture, forestry and horticultural uses (2) Retail sale of agricultural, forest or horticultural products produced on site. Such use shall be subject to site plan review in accordance with Article 14 of these Regulations. (3) Keeping of livestock (4) Single-family dwelling related to agriculture, forestry or horticultural use (5) Additional dwellings for farm employees, subject to site plan review in accordance with Article 14 of these Regulations. (6) Community center (7) Public educational facility (8) Recreation path (9) Municipal building (10) Private providers of public services (11) Recreation facility, indoor (12) Recreation facility, outdoor (13) Offices incidental and subordinate to a permitted use listed above D. Conditional Uses. The following uses are allowed in the Municipal District as conditional uses subject to approval by the Development Review Board in accordance with the provisions of this Section 7.03 and Table C-1, Table of Uses. (1) Day care centers (2) Public utility substation and transmission lines (3) Waste handling and transfer facilities (4) Commercial or public parking facility D E. Area, Density and Dimensional Requirements. In the Municipal District, all requirements of this Section 7.03 and Table C-2, Dimensional Standards shall apply. E F. Additional Standards. All applications within this District shall be subject to the following additional standards In reviewing any Permitted or Conditional Use proposed under this Section shall meet the following standards in addition to those in Article 14 of these Regulations: (1) The proposed use will provide an affirmative public benefit to the City and its citizens. (2) The proposed use will be compatible with and protect the ability to preserve public recreational use and planned open spaces and natural areas on the project site. Appendix C: Table of Uses – SEE CHANGES AT THE END OF THIS DOCUMENT. 6. Allow Unclosed Front Porches to Extend into Principal Building Setback in the R4 District 2.02 Specific Definitions … Porch: a covered but unenclosed projection from the main wall of a building. Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 13 Porch, open: A porch, open on three sides. Railings or walls on the sides shall not exceed 40 inches in height from the porch floor. Porch, enclosed: A porch, enclosed on two or more sides by glass, plastic, netting, wire, walls, or similar temporary or permanent materials at a height above 40 inches from the porch floor. 3.06 Setbacks and Buffers … K. Front Setback for Front Decks and Porches in the R4 District In the R4 District, an open porch or deck that shall not exceed the width of the building face to which the porch or deck is attached and that shall not have a depth greater than 12 feet as measured from the building face, shall have a minimum front setback of 10 feet. Access steps not greater than 5 feet in width may project no more than 5 feet in front of the porch or deck, but in no case shall be located closer than 5 feet from the front property line. An enclosed porch, or an open porch or deck exceeding 12 feet in depth, shall be considered part of the principal building and subject to standard front setbacks. 7. Update Planning Commission, Development Review Board, and Advisory Committees authorization, powers, duties, and membership 17.07 Planning Commission A. Authorization. The City of South Burlington Planning Commission is established via the City Charter, 24 V.S.A. App §13-701City Council shall appoint a Planning Commission. B. Members and Terms of Office. Membership and Terms of Office for the Planning Commission are set forth in the City Charter, 24 V.S.A. App §13-701. All members shall be appointed by the City Council. All members may be compensated and reimbursed by the City of South Burlington for necessary and reasonable expenses. All members of the Planning Commission shall be residents of the City of South Burlington. Any member may be removed at any time by a unanimous vote of the City Council. If a member relocates to another municipality before his or her term of office expires, such member shall be replaced. D. Powers, Duties, and Procedural Rules. The Planning Commission shall elect its chair, vice-chairman and a clerk. and shall exercise all powers and duties as provided for in the City Charter, 24 V.S.A. App. § 13-702. The Planning Commission shall keep a record of its resolutions, transactions, and findings of fact, which shall be maintained as a public record of the municipality. The Planning Commission shall adopt by majority vote of those members present and voting such rules as it deems necessary and appropriate for the performance of its functions. Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 14 E. Powers and Duties. The planning commission shall exercise all powers and duties as provided for in the City Charter, 24 V.S.A. App. § 13-702. 17.08 Development Review Board A. Authorization. The City of South Burlington Development Review Board is established by the City Council via resolution in accordance with shall appoint a Development Review Board24 V.S.A. §4460. B. Members. Board membership is set forth in 24 V.S.A. §4460 and as adopted by City Council resolution. The development review board shall have not fewer than five (5) nor more than nine (9) voting members. All members shall be appointed by the City Council. All members may be compensated and reimbursed by the City of South Burlington for necessary and reasonable expenses. The City Council may appoint alternates to the members to serve in situations when one or more members of the board are disqualified or are otherwise unable to serve. Vacancies shall be filled by the City Council for the unexpired terms and upon the expiration of such terms. Each member of the Development Review Board may be removed for cause by the City Council upon written charges and after public hearing. C. Term of Office [reserved]. Four Board members shall have terms of four years and three board members shall have terms of three years. D. Procedural Rules. The Development Review Board shall elect its own officers, and adopt rules of procedure, and operate pursuant to subject to Vermont Municipal Planning and Development Act Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 117, V.S.A. Section 4462 §4461. Meetings shall be held two times each month or at the call of the chairman and at such times as the board may determine. All meetings of the board shall be open to the public. The board shall keep minutes of its proceedings, showing the vote of each member upon each question, or, if absent or failing to vote, indicating this. The board shall keep records of its examinations and other official actions, all of which shall be immediately filed in the City Clerk's office as a public record. For the conduct of any hearing and the taking of any action, a quorum shall not be less than a majority of the members of the board, and any action thereof shall be taken by the concurrence of a majority of the board. 17.0910 Advisory Committees Design Review Committee A. Authorization. The City of South Burlington City Council may appoint one of more advisory committees in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4433. a Design Review Committee to advise the Development Review Board and the Planning Commission. B. Membership and terms of office. Advisory committee membership and terms of office are set forth in 24 V.S.A. §4433 and as adopted by City Council resolution. Any Design Review Committee shall have not fewer than five (5) voting members. All members shall be appointed by the City Council. All members may be compensated and Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 15 reimbursed by the City of South Burlington for necessary and reasonable expenses. All members of a design review committee shall be residents of the City of South Burlington. The City Council may appoint alternates to the members to serve in situations when one or more members of the board are disqualified or are otherwise unable to serve. C. Term of Office. The term of each member shall be three (3) years, except that the terms of the members first appointed shall be so staggered that no more than two shall be reappointed or replaced during any future calendar year. Any appointment to fill a vacancy shall be for the unexpired term and shall be made as soon as practicable. If a member relocates to another municipality before his or her term of office expires, such member shall be replaced by the City Council. Each member of a Design Review Committee may be removed for cause upon written charges and after public hearing held before the City Council. In such a case, a majority of voting members of the City Council shall be required to remove a committee member. D. Powers, Duties, and Procedural Rules. Advisory committees shall elect its own officers, adopt rules of procedure, and operate pursuant to 24 V.S.A. §4433, §4461 and §4464(d). A Design Review Committee shall elect its own officers and adopt rules of procedure, subject to Vermont Municipal Planning and Development Act Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 117, Section 4462. Meetings shall be held no less than once a month or at the call of the chairman and at such times as the committee may determine. All meetings of the committee shall be open to the public. The committee shall keep minutes of its proceedings, showing the vote of each member upon each question, or, if absent or failing to vote, indicating this. The committee shall keep records of its examinations and other official actions, all of which shall be immediately filed in the City Clerk's office as a public record. For the taking of any action, a quorum shall not be less than a majority of the members of the committee, and any action thereof shall be taken by the concurrence of a majority of the committee. E. Powers and Duties. (1) General. A design review committee is authorized to administer design review regulations as contained in these regulations. The committee may examine or cause to be examined any property, maps, books, or records bearing upon the matters concerned in a design review proceeding. 17.101 Amendments to Regulations and Maps [reserved] 17.121 Violations [reserved] 17.132 Penalties [reserved] 17.143 Appeals Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 16 An interested party may appeal any decision or act of the Administrative Officer to the Development Review Board within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision or act in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4465. 8. Remove Agricultural Uses Exempt by State Law, Create New Food Hub Use allowed in certain districts Section 2.02 Definitions Agriculture (Farming). shall include any of the following land use activities exempt from zoning regulation pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4413(d), as amended. conducted in accordance with state-defined accepted agricultural practices and/or best management practices.: the cultivation or other use of land for growing food, fiber, Christmas trees, maple sap, or horticultural and orchard crops; or the raising, feeding, or management of livestock, poultry, fish, or bees; or the operation of greenhouses; or the production of maple syrup; or the on-site storage, preparation and sale of agricultural products principally produced on the farm; or the on-site storage, preparation, production, and sale of fuel or power from agricultural products or wastes principally produced on the farm; or the raising, feeding, or management of four or more equines owned or boarded by the farmer, including training, showing, and providing instruction and lessons in riding, training, and the management of equines. Food hub. A facility that serves as the central location for the aggregation, storage, processing, distribution, and/or marketing of local and source-identified food. A food hub is closely aligned with a farm stand with respect to the types of products available. The principal function of a food hub shall be to provide local farmers and food producers predictable and coordinated access to individuals, retailers, and institutions. This is encouraged to be a distribution point for shares in Community Supported Agriculture (CSAs). A Food Hub is not a “Retail Sales” use. A food hub is not intended for consumers to shop through a wide variety of goods, especially those goods or food products that are neither processed nor grown locally, throughout most of the day, week, and year. A food hub may also constitute an organization responsible for the roles listed herein, and may include technical assistance to local farmers in conjunction with its duties as a central location. TABLE 13-3: PARKING REQUIREMENTS, AGRICUTURAL USES Use Spaces Required Notes Horticulture & forestry with on-premise sales 1 per employee plus 2 per 1,000 SF GFA Horticulture & forestry, no on-premise sales 1 per employee Keeping of livestock on 10 acres or more 1 per employee Single-family dwelling related to agriculture 2 per DU Additional dwelling for farm employees 1 per bedroom TABLE 13-4: PARKING REQUIREMENTS, PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC USES Use Spaces Required Notes Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 17 Place of worship 0.5 per seat Community center 0.33 per maximum permitted occupancy Cultural facility 0.33 per maximum permitted occupancy Use (continued) Parking Space Requirement Notes Educational facility: elementary and secondary schools 1 per classroom and other rooms used by students, staff or faculty, plus 0.25 per student of driving age Educational facility: college, university, or professional school 1 per classroom and other rooms used by students, staff or faculty, plus 0.50 per student Food Hub 1 per employee plus 2 per 1,000 SF GFA Personal instruction facility 2 per employee Municipal facility 3 per 1,000 SF GFA Educational support facilities 2 per 1,000 SF GFA [STAFF NOTE: parking table cut off in memo only for brevity] 13.27 Food Hubs A. Specific standards (1) Processing activities at the food hub location shall be limited to non- mechanized packaging, provided it is subordinate to the distribution activities. (2) Storage is permissible for terms of less than 30 days. (3) Butchering or killing of livestock shall not be permitted within the designated food hub area. (4) A food hub may be host to- with no greater frequency than once per week- a farmer’s market without additional municipal review or permitting. (5) Edible landscaping is strongly encouraged; the value of edible landscaping used at Food Hub sites shall be counted towards the minimum landscaping budget as 150% of every dollar planted. B. Permitting (1) Facilities under 5,000 GFA may be reviewed under Section 14.09, Administrative Review. (2) Facilities larger than 5,000 GFA shall require DRB Site Plan review in accordance with Chapter 14 of these Regulations. Appendix C: Table of Uses – SEE CHANGES AT THE END OF THIS MEMO. 9. Replace planned street connection between Barrett Street and San Remo Drive with recreation path, add new planned dead-end street north from Barrett Street Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 18 8.04 Blocks, Streets, and Alleys A. General Standards (5) Connectivity. All existing or proposed streets shall connect directly at each end to another existing public street, or planned or proposed street listed as a qualifying street type in the applicable BES. This requirement, however, shall not apply to the planned street extending north from Barrett Street depicted on the City Center Form Based Code Primary & Secondary Street & Block Standard applicability map. 10. Technical corrections, formatting and typos • Conditional Use Procedural clarification. 14.10 Conditional Use Review: General Provisions and Standards D. Review and Approval Procedure. A use designated as a conditional use in any district may be permitted by the Development Review Board, after public notice and public hearing, according to the following procedures: (1) Any conditional use shall be either: (a) is subject to site plan review, except as provided for in Section 14.03(B), and shall be therefore reviewed under the requirements of Article 14, Site Plan and Conditional Use Review; or, (b) is subject to planned unit development review and shall be therefore reviewed under the requirements of Article 15, Planned Unit Development. • Listing of SEQ-NRN District. 3.01 Establishment of Districts and Description of Certain Districts A. Establishment of Districts. (1) Residential Districts R1 Residential 1 District R1-PRD Residential 1 with Planned Residential Development District R1-Lakeshore Residential 1- Lakeshore District R2 Residential 2 District R4 Residential 4 District R7 Residential 7 District R12 Residential 12 District LN Lakeshore Neighborhood District QCP Queen City Park District SEQ-NRP Southeast Quadrant-Natural Resource Protection District SEQ-NRT Southeast Quadrant-Neighborhood Residential Transition District SEQ-NR Southeast Quadrant-Neighborhood Residential District SEQ-NRN Southeast Quadrant Neighborhood Residential North District SEQ-VR Southeast Quadrant-Village Residential District Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 19 • Parking in front of buildings in R7-NC. 4.06 RESIDENTIAL 7 WITH NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT - R7-NC … E. Additional Standards. … (3) Access, parking, and internal circulation: (a) Parking requirements may be modified, depending in the extent of shared parking, the presence of sidewalks or recreation paths, and residences lying within walking distance (defined as no further than one-fourth of mile for purposes of this zoning district). Any requirements for shared access and/or parking must be secured by permanent legal agreements acceptable to the City Attorney. (b) Parking shall be placed to the side or rear of the structures if possible. (c b) Parking areas shall be designed for efficient internal circulation and the minimum number of curb cuts onto the public roadway. (d c) Access improvements and curb cut consolidation may be required. (e d) Where existing residential dwellings are converted to nonresidential use, the residential appearance of the structure shall be retained. • Location Descriptions of C1-AUTO and C1-AIR districts. Removes the description of the location of these two districts. Other districts do not have such descriptions; they simply use the map. 5.02 COMMERCIAL 1 WITH AUTOMOBILE SALES DISTRICT (C1-AUTO) … C. [RESERVED] Location. This area is generally bounded to the south by Holmes Road, to the west by the western boundaries of 1185 - 1325 Shelburne Road and Fayette Road, to the north by the northern boundary of the South Burlington Cemetery Property west of Shelburne Road and the northern boundary of 1030 Shelburne Road east of Shelburne Road, and to the east by the R4 District boundary north of Baldwin Avenue and the centerline of Shelburne Road south of Baldwin Avenue. After the adoption of these land development regulations, new C1-AUTO districts shall be permitted only upon action of the Planning Commission and City Council and where the existing zoning is Commercial 1 (C1). 5.03 COMMERCIAL 1 DISTRICT WITH AIRPORT USES C1-AIR … C. [RESERVED] Location. After the adoption of these Regulations, new C1-AIR districts shall be permitted only upon action of the Planning Commission and City Council and only where the pre-existing zoning is Commercial 1 (C1), or where the new district is adjacent to the Burlington International Airport or to an existing Airport District or Airport Industrial District. • SEQ-NRN dimensions. Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 20 Single-family 12,000 SF (1.2)15%**30%20 10 30 15 25 28 2 3 1 4 Two-family 24,000 SF (1.2)15%30%20 10 30 15 25 28 2 3 1 4All other uses 40,000 SF (1.2)15%30%20 20 30 15 25 28 2 3 1 4 SEQ-NRP, NRT, NRN* and NR * See Article 9 for additional dimensional standards in the SEQ-NRN subdistrict. Where a conflicts exists, the more restrive shall apply. TABLE C-2 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS APPLICABLE IN ALL DISTRICTS • Dimensional standards, C1-LR, AR, SW districts. Appendix C Table of Dimensions • Density in C1-Auto district. Appendix C Table of Dimensions • Typographic correction in approval process. 17.04 Expiration of Permits and Approvals … B. Expiration of Approvals. Buildings only Buildings, parking and all other impervious surfaces Front(s)Side yard(s) Rear Accessory Principal (flat) Principal (pitched) Stories Facing Street Stories Below Roofline Roofline Stories [see section 3.07(B)] Total Stories Maximum site coverage: Maximum Building HeightStandard setbacks (feet):District Land Use Minimum lot size (max. residential density in dwelling units per acre) Single-family 6,000 SF (12)30%40%30 10 30 15 25 28 2 3 1 4 Two-family 8,000 SF (12)30%40%30 10 30 15 25 28 2 3 1 4 Multi-family 3,500 SF/unit (12)40%70%30 10 30 15 35 40 Retail (principal permitted use, max. 5,000 SF GFA) 20,000 SF 40%70%30 10 30 15 35 40 Other n Non- residential uses 20,000 SF 40%70%30 10 30 15 35 40 C1-LR Single-family 6,000 SF (12)30%40%30 10 30 15 25 28 2 3 1 4 Two-family 8,000 SF (12)30%40%30 10 30 15 25 28 2 3 1 4 Multi-family 3,500 SF/unit (12)40%70%30 10 30 15 35 40Retail (principal permitted use, max. 5,000 SF GFA) 20,000 SF 40%70%30 10 30 15 35 40 Other n Non-residential uses 20,000 SF 40%70%30 10 30 15 35 40 AR Single-family 6,000 SF (7)30%40%30 10 30 15 25 28 2 3 1 4 Two-family 10,000 SF (7)30%40%30 10 30 15 25 28 2 3 1 4 Multi-family 6,000 SF/unit (7)30%40%30 10 30 15 35 40 Retail (principal permitted use, max. 5,000 SF GFA) 20,000 SF 40%70%30 10 30 15 35 40 Other n Non-residential uses 20,000 SF 40%70%30 10 30 15 35 40 SW Buildings only Buildings, parking and all other impervious surfaces Front(s)Side yard(s)Rear Accessory Principal (flat)Principal (pitched)Stories Facing Street Stories Below Roofline Roofline Stories [see section 3.07(B)] Total Stories Maximum site coverage: Maximum Building HeightStandard setbacks (feet):District Land Use Minimum lot size (max. residential density in dwelling units per acre) C1-Auto Multi-family 3,500 SF/unit (12 or 15)40%70%30 15 30 15 35 40 All other uses 40,000 SF 40%70%30 15 30 15 35 40 Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations City Council Public Hearing Warned for 6-19-2017 21 (a) The Development Review Board or Administrative Officer has approved a request for extension of the approval. The Board or Administrative Officer may approve one (1) extension to an applicant of an approval if reapplication takes place before the approval has expired and if the Board determines that conditions are essentially unchanged from the time of the original approval. In granting such an extension, the Board or Administrative Officer may specify a period of time of up to one (1) year for the extension. APPENDIX C USES and DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS C-Residential/Institutional 1 South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective June 27, 2016 RESIDENTIAL & INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICTS IA(1)PR MU R1 R2 R4 R7 R7- NC(2) R12 LN QCP SEQ- NRP SEQ- NRT SEQ-NR SEQ-VR SEQ- VC(2) Residential Uses Single-family dwelling P P P P PUD PUD P P P P P P P Two-family dwelling PUD P P P PUD PUD P P P P P P Multi-family dwelling PUD PUD P PUD PUD PUD C PUD P P Accessory residential units Group home or Residential Care Home C P P P P PUD PUD P P P P P P P Agricultural Uses Agricultural uses consistent with State- defined "Farming" activity Horticulture & forestry with on-premise sales Horticulture & forestry, no on-premise sales Keeping of livestock on 10 acres or more P P P P P P P P P Single-family dwelling related to agriculture P P P P P P P P P P P P P Additional dwellings for farm employees P P P P P P P P P P P P P Public & Quasi-Public Uses Cemeteries Community center PUD P P P C P P P Congregate care, assisted living, or continuum of care facility C-TO C C C Cultural facility PUD (11) Educational facility PUD P C C C Educational support facilities PUD Funeral homes, mortuaries, and crematoriums C C Group quarters PUD (11) Hospice PUD P Municipal facility C C P Parks Personal instruction facility P P (6) Place of worship PUD (11)P P P P P P P P P P Recreation paths Institutional Residential Southeast Quadrant Please See Section 3.10 for Regulations Conditional in all districts Permitted in all districts Permitted in all districts Permitted in all districts; 3 acre minimum lot size in all districts. Permitted in all districts Exempt from local regulation in all districts APPENDIX C USES and DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS C-Residential/Institutional 2 South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective June 27, 2016 RESIDENTIAL & INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICTS IA(1)PR MU R1 R2 R4 R7 R7- NC(2) R12 LN QCP SEQ- NRP SEQ- NRT SEQ-NR SEQ-VR SEQ- VC(2) Institutional Residential Southeast Quadrant Social services PUD C-TO C Commercial Uses Adult use Auto & motorcycle service and repair, accessory use, no fueling pumps C Bed and breakfast, min. 1 acre lot C C C C C C C C(3) Family child care home, registered or licensed P P P P P P P P P P P P P Child care facility, licensed non-residential C C(12)P(12)P P (4)P Commercial greenhouse C-ACC Commercial or public parking facility N-PUD (11)C Food Hub P(7)P(6)P(6)P(6)P(7)P(7)P(6)P(6)P(6)P(6)P(7) Financial institution P Golf course C C C Office, general PUD (11)C (10)PUD-TO P PUD-TO C Office, medical PUD (11)PUD-TO P PUD-TO C Personal or business service, principal use N-PUD (7) (11) P P (6) Pet Grooming P Photocopy & printing shops with accessory retail N-PUD (11) Private providers of public services, including vehicle storage and maintenance P Recreation facility, indoor N-PUD (11)C P C P C C C P (6) Recreation facility, outdoor N-PUD (11)C P C P C C Research facility or laboratory N-PUD (11) Restaurant, short order N-PUD (11)C Restaurant, standard N-PUD (11)C C Retail sales N-PUD (7) (11) P (7)C (6) Seasonal Mobile Food Unit P Service station C Waste transfer stations C APPENDIX C USES and DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS C-Non-Residential 3 South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective June 27, 2016 City Center FBC District NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS C1 R12 C1 R15 C1- AUTO C1-AIR C1-LR AR SW IO C2 IC AIR AIR-IND Residential Uses Single-family dwelling PUD P P P Two-family dwelling PUD P P Multi-family dwelling PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD Accessory residential units Group home or Residential Care Home PUD P P P Agricultural Uses Horticulture & forestry with on-premise sales Horticulture & forestry, no on-premise sales Keeping of livestock on 10 acres or more Single-family dwelling related to agriculture P P Additional dwellings for farm employees P P Public & Quasi-Public Uses Cemeteries Community center P P PUD P Congregate care, assisted living, or continuum of care facility C C C C C Cultural facility Educational facility PUD PUD C C C Educational support facilities PUD(5)PUD(5) Food Hub P(7)P(6)P(6)P(6)P(6)P(6)P(6)P(7)P(7)P(7) Funeral homes, mortuaries, and crematoriums C C C C C C C C C C Hospice P P P P P P Municipal facility P P P C C Parks Personal instruction facility P P P P P P P P P P P Place of worship P P P P P P P P P-ACC AirportCommercial 1 Other Commercial Heavy Commercial- Industrial Exempt from local regulation in all districts Permitted in all districts Please see Section 3.10 for regulations Conditional in all districts APPENDIX C USES and DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS C-Non-Residential 4 South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective June 27, 2016 City Center FBC District NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS C1 R12 C1 R15 C1- AUTO C1-AIR C1-LR AR SW IO C2 IC AIR AIR-IND AirportCommercial 1 Other Commercial Heavy Commercial- Industrial Recreation paths Skilled nursing facility C C C C C C Social services C C C C C C C Commercial & Industrial Uses Adult use Agriculture & construction equipment sales, service & rental P P Airport Uses P P Animal shelter C C P Artist production studio P P P P P Auto & motorcycle sales P P P Auto & motorcycle service & repair P P P Auto rental, with private accessory car wash & fueling P P P P P Bed & breakfast C C Cannabis dispensary (dispensing only)P P P P P P P-TO Cannabis dispensary (cultivation only)P P Car wash P Child care facility, licensed non-residential P P P P P P P P P P Commercial greenhouse PUD P P Commercial kennel, veterinary hospital and pet day care C C P P P P Commercial or public parking facility C C C C C C C C C Contractor or building trade facility P P P P Distribution and related storage, with >15% of GFA in office or other principal permitted use by same tenant C P P P Drive-through bank PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD Permitted in all districts See Article 8 APPENDIX C USES and DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS C-Non-Residential 5 South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective June 27, 2016 City Center FBC District NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS C1 R12 C1 R15 C1- AUTO C1-AIR C1-LR AR SW IO C2 IC AIR AIR-IND AirportCommercial 1 Other Commercial Heavy Commercial- Industrial Equipment service, repair & rental P P Family child care home, registered or licensed P P P P Financial institution P P P P P ACC P P Flight instruction P P P Hotel PUD PUD PUD C C C C Hotel, extended stay PUD PUD C C C C Indoor theater P P Indoor vehicle storage, maximum 10,000 square feet P-ACC Junk yard Light manufacturing PUD PUD P P P P Lumber and contractor’s yard P P P Manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials & components P P P P P PUD P P P P Mobile home, RV and boat sales, repair & service P P Motor freight terminal C P Office, general P P P P P P P PUD P P P Office, medical P P P P P P P PUD-TO P P-TO Personal or business service P P P P P(7)P P P (7)P P Pet grooming P P P P P P P P P Photocopy & printing shops, with accessory retail P P P P P P P P-ACC P P Printing & binding production facilities C P P P P Private providers of public services, including vehicle storage and maintenance P P P P Processing and storage P P P P P P Radio & television studio P P P C P P P APPENDIX C USES and DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS C-Non-Residential 6 South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective June 27, 2016 City Center FBC District NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS C1 R12 C1 R15 C1- AUTO C1-AIR C1-LR AR SW IO C2 IC AIR AIR-IND AirportCommercial 1 Other Commercial Heavy Commercial- Industrial Recreation facility, indoor P P P P P P P P-ACC P P Recreation facility, outdoor C C C C C C C C C Research facility or laboratory P P P P P P P P P P P Restaurant, short order P P P P P P-ACC P-ACC P-ACC P P-ACC P-ACC Restaurant, standard P P P P P P P P P-ACC Retail sales P (8)P P P(8)P (7)P (7)P (7)P (7) P (9)P (8)P-ACC Retail warehouse outlet P P Sale, rental & repair of aircraft & related parts P P Seasonal Mobile Food Unit P P P P P P P P P Self-storage P ACC, P- Non-TO Service station C C Shopping center C C Taverns, night clubs & private clubs P P P P P P P P Transportation services P P Warehousing & distribution C C P P Wholesale establishments C C P P P Key and Notes to the Table above: (1) For all IA District Uses please refer to Section 7.01, Institutional and Agricultural District. "N" refers to the Institutional-Agricultural North sub-district. (2) R7 and SEQ-VC as classified as non-residential zoning districts, but are included in this table for purposes of efficiency (3) No minimum lot size for bed & breakfast in the SEQ-VC district P = Permitted Non-TO = Allowable only outside of the Transit Overlay District C = Conditional Use PUD = Allowable within a Planned Unit Development ACC = Allowable as an accessory use TO = Allowable only in the Transit Overlay District (4) Permitted within a structure existing and approved for use as an 'educational facility' as of July 1, 2013. The structure existings as of July 1, 2013, may be expanded, APPENDIX C USES and DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS C-Non-Residential 7 South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective June 27, 2016 City Center FBC District NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS C1 R12 C1 R15 C1- AUTO C1-AIR C1-LR AR SW IO C2 IC AIR AIR-IND AirportCommercial 1 Other Commercial Heavy Commercial- Industrial (5) Educational support facilities in C1 are subject to the dimensional standards of the IA-North District. See Article 7. (12) Allowable only as a municipally-operated facility. (11) Use is allowed only as an Educational Support Facility. See Section 7.01(E) (7) Use is limited to 5,000 SF GFA per tenant with a maximum 15,000 SF GFA total footprint for the building. Tenants shall have separate entries from one another and no direct passageways from one to another. (8) Use is limited to 15,000 SF GFA per tenant with a maximum 25,000 SF GFA total footprint for the building. Tenants shall have separate entries from one another and no direct passageways from one to another. (9) Use is limited to 30,000 SF GFA per tenant with a maximum 30,000 SF GFA total footprint for the building. Tenants shall have separate entries from one another and no direct passageways from one to another. (6) Use is limited to 3,000 SF GFA per tenant with a maximum 9,000 SF GFA total footprint for the building. Tenants shall have separate entries from one another and no direct passageways from one to another. (10) Use is restricted to not-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is the provision of educational or research services related to agriculture, horticulture, forestry, natural resource preservation, arts or recreation Appendix G Bicycle Parking Examples Acceptable Not Acceptable INVERTED U SERIES/CORRAL Post & Ring INVERTED U Bike lockers Vertical Two-Tier Graphics used with permission. Credit: AssociaƟon of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals, EssenƟals of Bike Parking, 2015 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY OF BURLINGTONDRDORSET ST SHERRY RDGARDEN STHINESBURG RDCOTTAGEGROVEAVE Commercial BoulevardGarden StreetSee 11.02(C)(1)Support StreetMarket StreetSee 11.02(C)(1)NeighborhoodStreet NarrowWHITE STPATCHEN RD WILLISTONRDPROUTY PKWYPINE STPINETREETERRDEANESTHOPKINS ST HELEN AV SHEPARDLNLILACLNHEATHSTMIDAS DR SUNSET AVWOODLANDPLEXECUTIVEMARY STMARKET STGILBERT STMYERS CT CHARLES ST IBYSTSPEAR ST ELSOM PKWY BARRETT STHAYDEN PKWY INTERSTATE89 OBRIEN DR S LO C UM ST SAN REMO DR EAST TERRNeighborhood StreetSupportStreetNeighborhood/Support StreetSupportStreetNeighborhoodStreetNeighborhood Street/Bike BoulevardCommercialBoulevardLegendExisting Road ParcelsPlanned Recreation PathPrimary Existing StreetsPrimary Planned StreetsSecondary Existing StreetsSecondary Planned StreetsPlanned Street Right of WayProposed City Center ZoningTransect ZonesT-1T-3T-3+T-4T-5Park/CivicEP:\Planning&Zoning\Zoning\FBC\FBC_PRim_SecRoads_BlockStndrd.mxd exported by:mbrumberg On 3/29/2017City Center Form Based Code - Primary & Secondary Streets & Block Standard ApplicabilityEffective Date: March 21, 2017DRAFT: March 29, 2017*Approximate locations of proposed roads, to be used for planning purposes only. Please refer to original studies for exact road centerlines.0 700 1,400350Feet Street Designation Label CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTONCITY OF BURLINGTONBlock StandardsAppicability Non-Exempt INTERSTATE 89W H IT E S T DORSET STHINESBURG RDA S P E N D R R U T H S T G A R D E N S T PATCHEN RDMIDAS DRMARY STM A R K E T S T WILLISTON RD I B Y S T SAN REMO DRLegend Form Based Code Area (346 acres) Existing Road Parcels Existing Streets Planned Streets Planned Recreation Path Planned Street Right of Way Parks Tax Parcel Boundary E P:\Planning&Zoning\Planning\OfficialMap\OfficialMap2016\OfficialMap_2016.mxd exported by:mbrumberg On 3/29/2017 City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning - Official Map (Form Based Code Area) Effective March 21, 2017 DRAFT: March 29, 2017 *Approximate locations of proposed roads, to be used for planning purposes only. Please refer to original studies for exact road centerlines. 0 700 1,400350 Feet 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD SD‐17‐17‐ _Final_PUD_Staff_Comments_255KennedyDrive_August_ 1_2017 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: July 28, 2017 Application received: June 9, 2017 255 KENNEDY DRIVE PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION #SD‐16‐37 Meeting date: August 1, 2017 Owners/Applicants O’Brien Family Limited Partnership & O’Brien Home Farm, LLC 1855 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Contact Andrew Gill, Project Coordinator (802) 658‐5000 Project Engineer Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. 164 Main Street Colchester, VT 05446 Property Information Tax Parcels 1260‐0200 and 0970‐00255 R‐12 and C1‐LR Zoning Districts ~39 acres total Location Map PROJECT DESCRIPTION Final plat application #SD‐17‐17 of O’Brien Farm Road, LLC for a planned unit development on 39.16 acres consisting of: 1) 64 single family dwellings, 2) 27 two (2) family dwellings, and 3) 14 lots, 255 Kennedy Drive. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD‐17‐17_Final_PUD_Staff_Comments_255KennedyDrive_August_1_2017.docx 2 COMMENTS Administrative Officer Ray Belair and Development Review Planner Marla Keene, referred to herein as staff, have reviewed the plans and offer the following comments. A) STREET NAMES Please note that road names have changed throughout the application process. In the preliminary plat application, roads were given placeholder names of Road A‐F. The final application was submitted during June 2017, before the Planning Commission approved road names. The final approved road names are used in these notes, as noted below. Preliminary Application Name Final Application Name Planning Commission Approved Name Road A O’Brien Farm Road Road B Generations Way Two Brothers Drive* Road C Laurentide Lane Road D Ledge Way Road E Two Brothers Drive Road F Split Rock Court *Road combined with Road E B) ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS The subject properties are located in the Residential 12, Commercial 1 with Limited Retail, and Residential 1‐ PRD Zoning Districts. The applicant has requested the following waivers, which were preliminarily approved: (a) Height and number of stories facing the street to be greater than 28 feet and three (3) stories (i.) Height equal to or less than the number of feet listed in the Building Height column of the Building Height Worksheet (which is found on the CD dated 6/8/2017) plus two (2) feet (Example: Building 1 lists 32.74 feet in the Building Height column and therefore the waiver would allow a building height equal to or less than 34.74 feet) (ii.) Up to three (3) stories below the roofline facing the street on Buildings 75‐96 (b) Front yard setbacks (i.) Six (6) foot front setback for houses on O’Brien Farm Road and 11 foot front setback for garages on O’Brien Farm Road (ii.) Six (6) foot front setback for houses and 11 ½ foot front setback for garages on Two Brothers Drive south of O’Brien Farm Road. (iii.) Five (5) foot front setback for houses and 10 foot front setback for garages on Laurentide Way, Ledge Way and Split Rock Court. (c) Rear yard setbacks The applicant provided a chart showing the setbacks for each footprint lot they are proposing. Thirty of the 118 footprint lots showed a need for a rear yard setback waiver. Since footprint lots do not exist for the purposes of the Land Development Regulations, the Board will instead refer to requests for rear yard CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD‐17‐17_Final_PUD_Staff_Comments_255KennedyDrive_August_1_2017.docx 3 setbacks for buildings. Staff considers rear yard setbacks of 25 feet on Buildings 1‐5, 27‐30, 44‐45, 48, 63, 73, and 95‐96 are acceptable. Staff considers rear yard setbacks of 27 feet on Buildings 22 and 49, 13 feet on Building 46, 14 feet on Building 47, 26 feet on Building 63, 20 feet on Building 64, 24 feet on Building 65, 21 feet on Building 66, 22 feet on Building 67, and 27 feet on Building 68 are acceptable. Staff considers rear yard setbacks of 27 feet on Building 73, 19 feet on Buildings 74 and 75, 20 feet on Building 76, 28 feet on Building 95, and 26 feet on Building 76 are acceptable. For the purposes of this approval, the footprint lots will be considered building envelopes. The applicant has indicated on the site plans that the buildings shown are for illustrative purposes and that buildings can be swapped out with other buildings approved for that location within the boundaries of the footprint lot. All dimensional requirements not discussed here are met. Staff continues to support these waivers. C) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, PUDs shall comply with the following standards and conditions: (A)(1) Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. The applicant has received a Preliminary Allocation Determination from the South Burlington Water Department. Upon final approval of the project, the applicant must request that the preliminary allocation be converted into a final application. The applicant has also received a preliminary wastewater allocation. Staff considers this criterion met. (A)(2) Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The Project will be required to obtain a State Construction Stormwater Permit, which attempts to ensure adequate protection of downstream receiving waters. (A)(3) The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. In an email dated July 28, 2017, the Director of the Department of Public Works indicated that these criteria are met and does not recommend the board invoke technical review of the traffic study. (A)(4) The project’s design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. Staff notes that during the Master Plan phase of this project the Board granted the applicant the ability to encroach on Class III wetlands. The project does propose to incorporate a few areas of open space, one (1) CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD‐17‐17_Final_PUD_Staff_Comments_255KennedyDrive_August_1_2017.docx 4 approximately four (4) acres in size and another of approximately three (3) acres, which may serve as habitat; however, staff considers these less than optimal for wildlife habitat due to being surrounded completely by houses and/or roads. No unique natural features have been identified on the site, though staff notes that as South Burlington becomes increasingly developed the forested and open nature of this parcel becomes less common in the City and, therefore, more unique. The Project has received a Vermont Wetland General Permit authorizing construction of a stormwater outfall with impacts to wetland buffer. The applicant has indicated the presence of a “Tree Protection Area” on the landscaping plan, which will be indicated with project demarcation tape (see Sheet LI.0). Staff considers this criterion met. (A)(5) The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The purpose of the Residential 12 Zoning District is to encourage high‐density residential use. The proposed project included in this final plat is not high‐density. The Master Plan for this site, however, contemplates as many as 458 housing units, which would bring the density of the site to nearly 12 units per acre. Staff considers the proposed project as meeting the purpose of the R12 Zoning District when viewed as part of the larger Master Plan vision for the site. (A)(6) Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. The proposed project provides for an open space area in the middle of the site (Lot #6 and open space easements associated with Lots #7 and #9) and another open space area as part of Lot #8. Two (2) 30 foot wide easements connect the open spaces of Lot #6 with undeveloped land to the east. This creates the opportunity for contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels. Staff considers this criterion met. (A)(7) The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The Fire Department met with the applicant and confirmed the location of no parking signs on Laurentide Lane, Ledge Way and Split Rock Court, which are only proposed to be 20 feet wide. Additionally, the applicant is reminded that hydrants have to be installed and tested before construction/ framing can be started. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD‐17‐17_Final_PUD_Staff_Comments_255KennedyDrive_August_1_2017.docx 5 (A)(8) Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. In an email dated July 28, 2017, the Director of the Department of Public Works indicated that these criteria are met and does not recommend the Board invoke technical review of the traffic study. (A)(9) Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards, absent a specific agreement with the applicant related to maintenance that has been approved by the City Council. For Transect Zone subdivisions, this standard shall only apply to the location and type of roads, recreation paths, and sidewalks. See the discussion above regarding comments from the Public Works Department. (A)(10) The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). The Board preliminary found that the parkland and open space proposed at the project site is sufficient to meet the requirements of the national referenced on the Official Map, and that the planned roadway connection complies with the Official Map. See below under Phasing for recommendations. (A)(11) The project’s design incorporates strategies that minimize site disturbance and integrate structures, landscaping, natural hydrologic functions, and other techniques to generate less runoff from developed land and to infiltrate rainfall into underlying soils and groundwater as close as possible to where it hits the ground. The Board preliminary found this criterion met. Staff considers this criterion met. D) SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: A. Relationship of Proposed Development to the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Due attention by the applicant should be given to the goals and objectives and the stated land use policies for the City of South Burlington as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. This criterion has been discussed above. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD‐17‐17_Final_PUD_Staff_Comments_255KennedyDrive_August_1_2017.docx 6 B. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site. (1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The Board preliminarily found that the site landscaping and architecture of the proposed housing units meet the criterion. Staff considers this criterion met. (2) Parking: (a) (not applicable) (b) The Development Review Board may approve parking between a public street and one or more buildings if the Board finds that one or more of the following criteria are met. The Board shall approve only the minimum necessary to overcome the conditions below. (i.) (not applicable) (ii.) The parking area will serve a single or two‐family home In addition to garages within the residential units, parking is proposed in the driveways in front of the single and two‐family houses. Each driveway appears to provide parking for two vehicles. The Board preliminarily found that parking in front of homes within the right‐of‐way is acceptable, but that parking shall not take place across the sidewalk or within the street. Staff considers this criterion met. (3) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or anticipated adjoining buildings. The proposed single and two‐family houses come in a variety of styles, footprint sizes, and number of stories; however, the Board preliminarily found that the are complimentary and no one style is so different in height or scale as to be incompatible with any other style. The applicant is requesting height and story waivers, which will be discussed elsewhere in these comments. (1) The applicant has provided a housing mix memorandum which Staff recommends that the Board include as a condition of approval. (4) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansion shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. The Board preliminary found this criterion met. Staff considers this criterion to be met. C. Relationship of Structures and Site to Adjoining Area. (1) The Development Review Board shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics (e.g., rhythm, color, texture, form or detailing), landscaping, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD‐17‐17_Final_PUD_Staff_Comments_255KennedyDrive_August_1_2017.docx 7 buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. (2) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The Board preliminarily found this criterion met. Staff considers this criterion to be met. In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: 1. Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. The applicant is proposing an easement at the north end of O’Brien Farm Road, which would allow that street to connect to the existing Old Farm Road. Additionally, the applicant has included two (2) pedestrian easements connecting Two Brothers Drive with other parcels also held by the applicant (or associates) on which development is not presently proposed, but will likely be proposed in the future. The Board preliminarily found this criterion met. See below under Phasing for recommendations. 2. Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire‐served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications must be underground. Staff considers this criterion to be met. 3. Disposal of Wastes. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The applicant is not proposing any dumpsters or other facilities. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD‐17‐17_Final_PUD_Staff_Comments_255KennedyDrive_August_1_2017.docx 8 4. Landscaping and Screening Requirements. (See Article 13, Section 13.06) Pursuant to Section 13.06(A) of the proposed Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to planned unit development review. The total cost of the buildings in the portion of the project seeking final plat approval is estimated at $33,040,000 by the applicant. The minimum landscaping budget, as shown below, is $337,900 and the applicant is proposing $370,002 exclusive of street trees. Total Building Construction or Building Improvement Cost % of Total Construction/ Improvement Cost Minimum Landscaping Budget $0 ‐ $250,000 3% $7,500 Next $250,000 2% $5,000 Additional over $500,000 1% $325,400 Minimum Landscaping $ $337,900 Proposed Landscaping $370,002 The City Arborist indicated on July 13, 2017 in an email to the applicant that there are no comments. E) RECREATION & BIKE/PEDESTRIAN A condition to preliminary approval was that a pedestrian path be added that will go from the end of O’Brien Farm Road to Old Farm Road. This is included in the application. The path is proposed to be surfaced with wood chips. Staff considers this criterion to be met. F) PHASING/BONDING The estimated cost of Project infrastructure including 15% contingency is $5,560,624.85. This figure has been confirmed by the Director of Public Works in an email dated July 28, 2017 as follows. I spent some time reviewing their estimate and find it acceptable for bonding purposes. Their estimate worksheet is for obvious reasons not unit based, but I did a take‐off to estimate quantities and applied standard industry per unit pricing and came very close to their overall numbers for earth work, utilities and general site conditions. I also totaled their landscaping numbers and found them to be within acceptable range based on the required percent of total building costs (which I estimated) that goes to landscaping as required by our regulations. The applicant shall post a bond for the infrastructure in the amount of $5,560,624.85. As noted above, the total minimum landscaping cost is $337,900. The applicant shall post a bond or letter of credit for this amount. The format of the bonds will be determined by the administrative officer. (2) On plan sheet PH‐1, the applicant has proposed a phasing plan to outline the infrastructure elements which will be tied to each housing unit phase. Staff recommends that the Board adopt the phasing plan as a permit condition. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD‐17‐17_Final_PUD_Staff_Comments_255KennedyDrive_August_1_2017.docx 9 G) STORMWATER The Stormwater Section provided the following comments in an email to staff dated July 24, 2017, which addresses issues related to this criterion: The Stormwater Section has reviewed the “O’Brien Home Farm” site plan prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, dated 12/16/16 and last updated on 7/19/17. We would like to offer the following comments: 1. This project is located in the Potash Brook watershed. This watershed is listed as stormwater impaired by the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). As the project proposes to create greater than 1 acre of impervious area and disturb greater than 1 acre of land, it will require a stormwater permit and construction permit from the Vermont DEC Stormwater Division. The applicant should acquire these permits before starting construction. 2. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to regularly maintain all stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure. (3) Staff recommends that the board require the applicant comply with stormwater section’s comments. H) WAIVERS The applicant requested a number of waivers in the preliminary application, and the Board preliminarily approved them: a. Height equal to or less than the number of feet listed in the Building Height column of the Building Height Worksheet (which is found on the CD dated 4/7/2017) plus two (2) feet (Example: Building 1 lists 32.74 feet in the Building Height column and therefore the waiver would allow a building height equal to or less than 34.74 feet) b. Up to three (3) stories below the roofline facing the street on Buildings 75‐96 c. Front yard setbacks of six (6) feet for buildings on Street A and 11 feet for garages on Street A d. Front yard setbacks of six (6) feet for buildings on Street A and 11 ½ feet for garages on Street E e. Front yard setbacks of five (5) feet for buildings on Streets C, D, and F and 10 feet for garages on Streets C, D, and F f. Rear yard setbacks of 25 feet on Buildings 1‐5, 27‐30, 44‐45, 48, 63, 73, and 95‐96 g. Rear yard setbacks of 27 feet on Buildings 22 and 49, 13 feet on Building 46, 14 feet on Building 47, 26 feet on Building 63, 20 feet on Building 64, 24 feet on Building 65, 21 feet on Building 66, 22 feet on Building 67, and 27 feet on Building 68 h. Rear yard setbacks of 27 feet on Building 73, 19 feet on Buildings 74 and 75, 20 feet on Building 76, 28 feet on Building 95, and 26 feet on Building 76 (4) As noted above, staff supports these waivers. Staff recommends that the board affirm all waivers. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD‐17‐17_Final_PUD_Staff_Comments_255KennedyDrive_August_1_2017.docx 10 I) IMPACT FEES The applicant has requested that a portion of the impact fees which would be assessed for the project be waived in light of in‐kind contributions, i.e. parks development which will be done by the applicant instead of the City. (5) If the Board approves this request, staff recommends the Board provide a letter describing this recommendation to the City Council for their approval. J) ENERGY STANDARDS The Board notes that all new buildings are subject to the Stretch Code pursuant to Section 3.15: Residential and Commercial Building Energy Standards of the LDRs. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Board discuss the project with the applicant and conclude the hearing. Respectfully submitted, ___________________________ Marla Keene, Development Review Planner O'BRIEN HOME FARMELDREDGE STREET, KENNEDY DRIVE, & OLD FARM ROADJULY 26, 2017Rye ApartmentsHayes ApartmentsKennedy Drive Hinesburg RoadEldredge StreetHayes AvenueSITEOld Farm RoadKimball AvenueWilliston RoadGENERATIONSWAYO'BRIENFARMROADTWOBROTHESDRIVELAURENTIDELANESOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONTLEDGEWAYSPLIT ROCKCOURT AdA, AdB, AdD 0.170.49-0.24BlBSOILKEYERODIBILITY(K VALUE)0.17Adams & Windsor loamy sandsBelgrade & Eldridge soilsSOILDESCRIPTIONFaC 0.32Farmington extremely rocky loamAB-CBDTABLE OF SOILS CHARACTERISTICSHYDROLOGICSOIL GROUPDdA, DdB Duane & Deerfield soilsFsB 0.32-0.28Farmington-Stockbridge rocky loam D-C CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCTION NOTES AABB AA -2%12'5$:1352-0*5&+(&.(',668('$7(7+(6(3/$16$1'63(&,),&$7,216$5(3527(&7('81'(5)('(5$/&23<5,*+7/$:6%6%'(6,*10$,17$,162:1(56+,32)68&+$1'$//5,*+76$1'35,9,/(*(62 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP6LQJOH)DPLO\'RZQKLOO/RW6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW6)-6-0-06KHHW3/$1(/(9$7,2163(50,72 %ULHQ%URWKHUV$JHQF\5(9,6,2163/$1$6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW2 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP6LQJOH)DPLO\'RZQKLOO/RW6)$5DQFK)DUPKRXVH(OHYDWLRQ$5DQFK&UDIWVPDQ(OHYDWLRQ%2SW8SSHU)ORRU)DUPKRXVH(OHYDWLRQ$2SW8SSHU)ORRU&RORQLDO(OHYDWLRQ' -2%12'5$:1352-0*5&+(&.(',668('$7(7+(6(3/$16$1'63(&,),&$7,216$5(3527(&7('81'(5)('(5$/&23<5,*+7/$:6%6%'(6,*10$,17$,162:1(56+,32)68&+$1'$//5,*+76$1'35,9,/(*(62 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP6LQJOH)DPLO\'RZQKLOO/RW6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW6)-6-0-06KHHW3/$1(/(9$7,2163(50,72 %ULHQ%URWKHUV$JHQF\5(9,6,2165DQFK)DUPKRXVH(OHYDWLRQ$5DQFK&UDIWVPDQ(OHYDWLRQ%2SW8SSHU)ORRU)DUPKRXVH(OHYDWLRQ$2SW8SSHU)ORRU&UDIWVPDQ(OHYDWLRQ%6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW2 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP6LQJOH)DPLO\'RZQKLOO/RW6)%3/$1% -2%12'5$:1352-0*5&+(&.(',668('$7(7+(6(3/$16$1'63(&,),&$7,216$5(3527(&7('81'(5)('(5$/&23<5,*+7/$:6%6%'(6,*10$,17$,162:1(56+,32)68&+$1'$//5,*+76$1'35,9,/(*(62 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP6LQJOH)DPLO\'RZQKLOO/RW6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW6)-6-0-06KHHW3/$1(/(9$7,2163(50,72 %ULHQ%URWKHUV$JHQF\5(9,6,2163/$1&5DQFK)DUPKRXVH(OHYDWLRQ$5DQFK&UDIWVPDQ(OHYDWLRQ%6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW2 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP6LQJOH)DPLO\'RZQKLOO/RW6)&2SW8SSHU)ORRU)DUPKRXVH(OHYDWLRQ$2SW8SSHU)ORRU&RORQLDO(OHYDWLRQ' -2%12'5$:1352-0*5&+(&.(',668('$7(7+(6(3/$16$1'63(&,),&$7,216$5(3527(&7('81'(5)('(5$/&23<5,*+7/$:6%6%'(6,*10$,17$,162:1(56+,32)68&+$1'$//5,*+76$1'35,9,/(*(62 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP6LQJOH)DPLO\8SKLOO/RW6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW6)-6-0-06KHHW3/$1(/(9$7,2163(50,72 %ULHQ%URWKHUV$JHQF\5(9,6,2166RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW2 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP6LQJOH)DPLO\8SKLOO/RW6)$)DUPKRXVH(OHYDWLRQ$3/$1$&UDIWVPDQ(OHYDWLRQ% -2%12'5$:1352-0*5&+(&.(',668('$7(7+(6(3/$16$1'63(&,),&$7,216$5(3527(&7('81'(5)('(5$/&23<5,*+7/$:6%6%'(6,*10$,17$,162:1(56+,32)68&+$1'$//5,*+76$1'35,9,/(*(62 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP6LQJOH)DPLO\8SKLOO/RW6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW6)-6-0-06KHHW3/$1(/(9$7,2163(50,72 %ULHQ%URWKHUV$JHQF\5(9,6,2163/$1%6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW2 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP6LQJOH)DPLO\8SKLOO/RW6)%)DUPKRXVH(OHYDWLRQ$0RGHUQ(OHYDWLRQ( -2%12'5$:1352-0*5&+(&.(',668('$7(7+(6(3/$16$1'63(&,),&$7,216$5(3527(&7('81'(5)('(5$/&23<5,*+7/$:6%6%'(6,*10$,17$,162:1(56+,32)68&+$1'$//5,*+76$1'35,9,/(*(62 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP'XSOH['RZQKLOO/RW6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW06-0-0-06KHHW3/$1(/(9$7,2163(50,72 %ULHQ%URWKHUV$JHQF\5(9,6,2166RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW2 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP'XSOH['RZQKLOO/RW'83%XLOGLQJ8QLW'$%8,/',1*'$8QLW'(OHYDWLRQ)0RGHUQ)DUPKRXVH8QLW$(OHYDWLRQ)0RGHUQ)DUPKRXVH -2%12'5$:1352-0*5&+(&.(',668('$7(7+(6(3/$16$1'63(&,),&$7,216$5(3527(&7('81'(5)('(5$/&23<5,*+7/$:6%6%'(6,*10$,17$,162:1(56+,32)68&+$1'$//5,*+76$1'35,9,/(*(62 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP'XSOH['RZQKLOO/RW6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW06-6-0-06KHHW3/$1(/(9$7,2163(50,72 %ULHQ%URWKHUV$JHQF\5(9,6,216%8,/',1*&%6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW2 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP'XSOH['RZQKLOO/RW'83%XLOGLQJ8QLW&%8QLW&(OHYDWLRQ)0RGHUQ)DUPKRXVH8QLW%(OHYDWLRQ)0RGHUQ)DUPKRXVH -2%12'5$:1352-0*5&+(&.(',668('$7(7+(6(3/$16$1'63(&,),&$7,216$5(3527(&7('81'(5)('(5$/&23<5,*+7/$:6%6%'(6,*10$,17$,162:1(56+,32)68&+$1'$//5,*+76$1'35,9,/(*(62 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP'XSOH['RZQKLOO/RW6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW06$XWKRU'HVLJQHU&KHFNHU6KHHW3/$1(/(9$7,2163(50,72 %ULHQ%URWKHUV$JHQF\5(9,6,216%8,/',1*'$6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW2 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP'XSOH['RZQKLOO/RW'83%XLOGLQJ8QLW'$8QLW'(OHYDWLRQ)0RGHUQ)DUPKRXVH8QLW$(OHYDWLRQ)0RGHUQ)DUPKRXVH -2%12'5$:1352-0*5&+(&.(',668('$7(7+(6(3/$16$1'63(&,),&$7,216$5(3527(&7('81'(5)('(5$/&23<5,*+7/$:6%6%'(6,*10$,17$,162:1(56+,32)68&+$1'$//5,*+76$1'35,9,/(*(62 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP'XSOH['RZQKLOO/RW6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW06-6-0-06KHHW3/$1(/(9$7,2163(50,72 %ULHQ%URWKHUV$JHQF\5(9,6,216%8,/',1*&%6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW2 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP'XSOH['RZQKLOO/RW'83%XLOGLQJ8QLW&%8QLW&(OHYDWLRQ)0RGHUQ)DUPKRXVH8QLW%(OHYDWLRQ)0RGHUQ)DUPKRXVH -2%12'5$:1352-0*5&+(&.(',668('$7(7+(6(3/$16$1'63(&,),&$7,216$5(3527(&7('81'(5)('(5$/&23<5,*+7/$:6%6%'(6,*10$,17$,162:1(56+,32)68&+$1'$//5,*+76$1'35,9,/(*(62 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP'XSOH['RZQKLOO/RW6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW06-6-0-06KHHW3/$1(/(9$7,2163(50,72 %ULHQ%URWKHUV$JHQF\5(9,6,216%8,/',1*'%6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW2 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP'XSOH['RZQKLOO/RW'83%XLOGLQJ8QLW'%8QLW'(OHYDWLRQ)0RGHUQ)DUPKRXVH8QLW%(OHYDWLRQ)0RGHUQ)DUPKRXVH -2%12'5$:1352-0*5&+(&.(',668('$7(7+(6(3/$16$1'63(&,),&$7,216$5(3527(&7('81'(5)('(5$/&23<5,*+7/$:6%6%'(6,*10$,17$,162:1(56+,32)68&+$1'$//5,*+76$1'35,9,/(*(62 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP'XSOH[8SKLOO/RW6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW06-6-0-06KHHW3/$1(/(9$7,2163(50,75(9,6,216%8,/',1*6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW2 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP'XSOH[8SKLOO/RW'83%XLOGLQJ8QLW$%8QLW$(OHYDWLRQ&6KLQJOH8QLW%(OHYDWLRQ&6KLQJOH ZZZEVEGHVLJQFRP:HVWRZQ3DUNZD\6XLWH:HVW'HV0RLQHV,RZD-2%12'5$:1352-0*5&+(&.(',668('$7(7+(6(3/$16$1'63(&,),&$7,216$5(3527(&7('81'(5)('(5$/&23<5,*+7/$:6%6%'(6,*10$,17$,162:1(56+,32)68&+$1'$//5,*+76$1'35,9,/(*(62 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP'XSOH[8SKLOO/RW6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW06-6-0-06KHHW3/$1(/(9$7,2163(50,75(9,6,216%8,/',1*8QLW$(OHYDWLRQ&6KLQJOH8QLW%(OHYDWLRQ&6KLQJOH6RXWK%XUOLQJWRQ9HUPRQW2 %ULHQ+RPH)DUP'XSOH[8SKLOO/RW'83%XLOGLQJ8QLW$% OBBA Design Memorandum for Home Farm In addition to the minimum legal requirements as outlined in the May 12, 2003 City of South Burlington Land Development Regulations, as amended June 27, 2016, in order to ensure a mix of housing styles, the Applicant agrees to the following additional limits: 1. Definitions: a. Color Palate: The color palate is comprised of: i. Primary siding color; ii. Accent siding color; iii. Roofing color; iv. Trim Color; v. Colored accents such as shutters or door and window frames; and vi. Front door color. b. Identical Elevation: Is a home that does not include at least two Variations, as defined herein. c. Elevation: a front-facing home configuration identified on Architecture Sheets 1 through 12 d. Palate of Materials: The palate of materials includes the primary siding, and any of the following additional items: i. Accent siding; ii. Masonry; iii. Porch railings or stair railings; iv. Presence or absence or style of shutters; v. Front door location or style; vi. Windows location or pane configuration; vii. Garage door panel style or number; and viii. Cornices and decorative trim. e. Variation: Variations to a home include: i. Mirroring of the home plan; ii. Changing the color of at least four elements of the home color palate; iii. Modifying a gable location or style; iv. Modifying the window number or placement; v. Modifying the roof lines; and vi. Changing at least four elements of the Palate of Materials on the front facing façade. This includes changes in type or look of elements. For instance, changing from horizontal lap siding to shake siding, even if both are made of the same material. 2. Specific Neighborhood Limitations: a. Identical Elevations as provided in Architecture Sheets 1 through 12 without Variations may not be constructed on adjoining lots or facing one another across the street. b. No Identical Elevation shall be repeated more than two times on Laurentide Lane. c. No Identical Elevation shall be repeated more than two times on Ledge Way. d. No Identical Elevation shall be repeated more than two times on Split Rock Court. e. No Identical Elevation shall be repeated more than three times on Two Brothers Drive. f. No Identical Elevation shall be repeated more than 3 times on the downhill side of O’Brien Farm Road. g. No Identical Elevation shall be repeated more than 3 times on the uphill side of O’Brien Farm Road. h. No single color palate shall be repeated more than ten times in the subdivision without variation to at least two elements within the color palate regardless of elevation. KΖƌŝĞŶ,ŽŵĞ&ĂƌŵWŚĂƐĞϭ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ,ĞŝŐŚƚtŽƌŬƐŚĞĞƚ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐη ŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶ EůĞǀ͘ EtůĞǀ͘ ^ůĞǀ͘ ^tůĞǀ͘ &ŝŶŝƐŚ&ůŽŽƌ ůĞǀ͘ ,ĞŝŐŚƚĨƌŽŵ &ŝŶŝƐŚ&ůŽŽƌ ƚŽZŽŽĨ DŝĚƉŽŝŶƚ ZŽŽĨ DŝĚƉŽŝŶƚ ůĞǀ͘ ǀĞƌĂŐĞWƌĞͲ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ 'ƌĂĚĞ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ;&ƌŽŵ ƉƌĞͲĞdž͘ 'ƌĂĚĞͿ DĂdž EƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨ^ƚŽƌŝĞƐ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ZĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚ;,ĞŝŐŚƚĂƐ ĚĞĨŝŶĞĚďLJ ZĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƉůƵƐϮΖͿ ϭ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϰϮ͘ϱ ϯϯϴ͘ϵ ϯϰϮ͘ϳ ϯϯϴ͘ϲ ϭ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϰϳ͘ϭ ϯϯϵ͘ϰ ϯϰϳ͘ϵ ϯϯϵ͘ϰ Ϯ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϰϯ͘Ϯ ϯϯϴ͘ϯ ϯϰϴ͘ϵ ϯϯϵ Ϯ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϰϴ ϯϰϬ ϯϰϵ ϯϰϬ ϯ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϰϵ͘ϰ ϯϯϵ͘ϴ ϯϱϬ ϯϰϬ͘ϳ ϯ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϬ ϯϰϮ͘Ϯ ϯϱϬ͘ϱ ϯϰϮ͘Ϯ ϰ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϰϵ͘ϵ ϯϰϬ͘ϯ ϯϰϴ͘Ϯ ϯϰϮ͘ϱ ϰ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϭ ϯϰϯ͘ϳ ϯϱϮ͘ϴ ϯϰϰ ϱ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϰϴ͘ϱ ϯϰϯ ϯϱϭ ϯϰϱ͘ϱ ϱ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϮ͘ϳϱ ϯϰϲ ϯϱϯ ϯϰϲ ϲ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϱϴ͘Ϯϱ ϯϱϯ͘ϱ ϯϱϴ͘ϱ ϯϱϲ͘ϱ ϲ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϲϮ ϯϱϮ͘ϲ ϯϲϭ ϯϱϮ͘ϴ ϳ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϱϲ͘ϭ ϯϱϮ͘Ϯ ϯϱϳ͘ϳ ϯϱϮ͘ϱ ϳ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϵ ϯϱϮ͘ϭ ϯϲϬ͘Ϯ ϯϱϭ ϴ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϱϰ͘ϲ ϯϱϭ͘ϱ ϯϱϲ ϯϱϮ͘ϯ ϴ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϴ͘ϱ ϯϰϵ ϯϱϴ͘ϱ ϯϰϵ ϵ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϱϲ ϯϱϭ͘ϴ ϯϱϰ͘ϱ ϯϱϬ͘ϵ ϵ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϴ͘Ϯ ϯϰϴ͘ϱ ϯϱϴ͘Ϯ ϯϰϴ͘ϱ ϭϬ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϱϲ͘ϯ ϯϱϯ ϯϱϳ͘ϭ ϯϱϯ ϭϬ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϴ͘Ϯ ϯϰϴ͘ϱ ϯϱϴ͘Ϯ ϯϰϴ͘ϱ ϭϭ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϱϯ͘ϲ ϯϱϬ͘ϲ ϯϱϱ͘ϰ ϯϱϮ͘ϱ ϭϭ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϴ͘ϱ ϯϰϴ͘ϱ ϯϱϴ͘ϱ ϯϰϴ͘ϱ ϭϮ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϲϴ ϯϲϰ͘Ϯ ϯϲϵ͘ϲ ϯϲϮ͘ϴ ϭϮ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϳϳ ϯϲϵ͘ϰ ϯϳϳ ϯϲϵ͘ϰ ϭϯ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϲϵ͘ϲ ϯϲϰ͘ϭ ϯϳϬ͘Ϯ ϯϲϱ͘ϰ ϭϯ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϳϲ ϯϲϳ͘ϰ ϯϳϲ ϯϲϳ͘ϰ ϭϰ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϳϬ ϯϲϱ͘ϰ ϯϲϵ ϯϲϰ ϭϰ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϳϱ͘Ϯϱ ϯϲϲ͘ϵ ϯϳϱ͘Ϯϱ ϯϲϲ͘ϵ ϭϱ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϲϵ͘ϯ ϯϲϯ͘ϰ ϯϳϬ͘ϭ ϯϲϯ ϭϱ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϳϰ͘ϱ ϯϲϲ͘Ϯ ϯϳϰ͘ϱ ϯϲϲ͘Ϯ ϭϲ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϳϬ ϯϲϮ͘ϱ ϯϲϵ͘ϱ ϯϲϬ͘ϱ ϭϲ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϳϰ͘ϱ ϯϲϲ͘Ϯ ϯϳϰ͘ϱ ϯϲϲ͘Ϯ ϭϳ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϲϵ͘ϰ ϯϲϮ͘Ϯ ϯϳϮ͘Ϯ ϯϲϰ͘ϲ ϯϰϵ ϯϰϵ͘ϱϰ ϯϱϭ͘ϴ ϯϱϯ͘ϯ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϯϮ͘ϳϰ ϯϭ͘ϲϭ ϯϭ͘Ϯϰ ϯϮ͘ϰϵ ϯϳϯ͘ϰϮ ϯϳϯ͘ϵϲ ϯϳϲ͘ϮϮ ϯϳϳ͘ϳϮ ϯϰϬ͘ϲϴ ϯϰϮ͘ϯϱ ϯϰϰ͘ϵϴ ϯϰϱ͘Ϯϯ ϯϱϮ͘ϴϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϯϳϴ͘ϯϯ ϯϱϲ͘ϲϵ Ϯϭ͘ϲϰ ϯϱϱ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϯϳϵ͘ϲϳ ϯϰϳ͘ϬϬ ϯϮ͘ϲϳ ϯϱϬ͘ϯϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϯϳϱ͘ϴϯ ϯϱϰ͘ϲϯ Ϯϭ͘Ϯϭ ϯϰϴ͘ϴϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϯϳϰ͘ϯϯ ϯϱϯ͘ϲϬ ϮϬ͘ϳϯ ϯϰϴ͘ϱϴ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϯϳϰ͘Ϭϴ ϯϱϰ͘ϴϱ ϭϵ͘Ϯϯ ϯϰϴ͘ϱϴ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϯϳϰ͘Ϭϴ ϯϱϯ͘ϯϬ ϮϬ͘ϳϴ ϯϳϵ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϬϯ͘ϰϮ ϯϲϲ͘ϭϱ ϯϳ͘Ϯϳ ϯϰϴ͘ϴϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϯϳϰ͘ϯϯ ϯϱϯ͘Ϭϯ Ϯϭ͘ϯϭ ϯϳϲ͘ϱ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϬϬ͘ϵϮ ϯϲϳ͘ϭϬ ϯϯ͘ϴϮ ϯϳϳ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϬϭ͘ϰϮ ϯϲϳ͘ϯϯ ϯϰ͘Ϭϵ ϯϳϱ͘ϴ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϬϬ͘ϮϮ ϯϲϱ͘ϲϯ ϯϰ͘ϱϵ ϯϳϱ͘ϴ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϬϬ͘ϮϮ ϯϲϲ͘ϰϱ ϯϯ͘ϳϳ ϯϳϱ ϴ Ϯϰ ϰϮ ϰϬϬ ϮϮ ϯϲϳ ϭϬ ϯϯ ϭϮ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ ϯϰ͘ϳϰ ϯϯ͘ϲϭ ϯϯ͘Ϯϰ ϯϰ͘ϰϵ ϯϰ͘ϲϳ Ϯϯ͘ϲϰ Ϯϯ͘Ϯϭ ϮϮ͘ϳϯ ϮϮ͘ϳϴ Ϯϭ͘Ϯϯ Ϯϯ͘ϯϭ ϯϵ͘Ϯϳ ϯϲ͘Ϭϵ ϯϱ͘ϴϮ ϯϱ͘ϳϳ ϯϲ͘ϱϵ ϯϱ ϭϮ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐη ŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶ EůĞǀ͘ EtůĞǀ͘ ^ůĞǀ͘ ^tůĞǀ͘ &ŝŶŝƐŚ&ůŽŽƌ ůĞǀ͘ ,ĞŝŐŚƚĨƌŽŵ &ŝŶŝƐŚ&ůŽŽƌ ƚŽZŽŽĨ DŝĚƉŽŝŶƚ ZŽŽĨ DŝĚƉŽŝŶƚ ůĞǀ͘ ǀĞƌĂŐĞWƌĞͲ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ 'ƌĂĚĞ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ;&ƌŽŵ ƉƌĞͲĞdž͘ 'ƌĂĚĞͿ DĂdž EƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨ^ƚŽƌŝĞƐ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ZĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚ;,ĞŝŐŚƚĂƐ ĚĞĨŝŶĞĚďLJ ZĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƉůƵƐϮΖͿ ϭϳ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϳϰ͘ϱ ϯϲϲ͘Ϯ ϯϳϰ͘ϱ ϯϲϲ͘Ϯ ϭϴ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϳϭ͘ϵ ϯϲϰ͘ϰ ϯϳϭ͘ϲ ϯϲϱ͘ϱ ϭϴ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϳϱ ϯϲϲ͘ϳ ϯϳϱ ϯϲϲ͘ϳ ϭϵ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϳϭ͘ϳ ϯϲϲ͘ϰ ϯϳϭ͘ϱ ϯϲϲ͘Ϯ ϭϵ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϳϱ͘ϳ ϯϲϳ͘ϰ ϯϳϱ͘ϳ ϯϲϳ͘ϰ ϮϬ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϳϭ͘ϳ ϯϲϴ ϯϳϬ͘ϳ ϯϲϳ ϮϬ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϳϲ ϯϲϳ͘ϳ ϯϳϲ ϯϲϳ͘ϳ Ϯϭ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϳϴ͘ϲ ϯϳϰ͘ϱ ϯϴϲ͘Ϯ ϯϳϵ͘ϭ Ϯϭ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϳϳ ϯϳϳ ϯϴϲ͘ϵϲ ϯϴϰ ϮϮ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϳϱ͘ϱ ϯϳϱ͘ϭ ϯϳϳ͘ϱ ϯϳϲ͘ϲ ϮϮ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϴϱ͘ϰϲ ϯϳϱ͘ϱ ϯϴϱ͘ϰϲ ϯϳϱ͘ϱ Ϯϯ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϳϳ͘Ϯ ϯϳϯ͘ϳ ϯϳϱ͘ϰ ϯϳϰ͘ϰ Ϯϯ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϴϱ͘ϰ ϯϳϱ͘ϴ ϯϴϱ͘ϰ ϯϳϱ͘ϴ Ϯϰ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϳϴ͘ϲ ϯϳϰ͘ϯ ϯϳϲ͘Ϯ ϯϳϰ͘ϯ Ϯϰ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϴϰ ϯϳϱ ϯϴϰ ϯϳϱ Ϯϱ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϴϮ͘ϴ ϯϳϱ͘ϳ ϯϳϵ͘ϵ ϯϳϯ͘ϳ Ϯϱ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϴϰ͘ϵ ϯϳϲ ϯϴϰ ϯϳϱ Ϯϲ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϵϬ͘ϱ ϯϳϲ͘ϵ ϯϴϱ ϯϳϲ͘Ϯ Ϯϲ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϴϲ͘ϱ ϯϳϳ ϯϴϲ ϯϳϳ Ϯϳ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϵϮ͘Ϯ ϯϳϴ ϯϵϭ ϯϳϳ͘ϱ Ϯϳ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϴϳ͘ϰ ϯϳϴ ϯϴϳ͘ϰ ϯϳϳ͘ϱ Ϯϴ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϴϴ͘ϳ ϯϳϳ ϯϵϬ͘ϴ ϯϳϳ Ϯϴ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϴϴ ϯϳϴ͘ϱ ϯϴϴ ϯϳϴ͘ϱ Ϯϵ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϬϰ͘ϭ ϯϵϱ͘ϱ ϰϬϰ͘ϴ ϯϵϵ Ϯϵ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϬ ϯϵϭ͘ϴϳ ϰϬϬ ϯϵϭ͘ϴϳ ϯϬ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϬϱ͘ϰ ϰϬϬ͘ϰ ϰϬϳ͘ϰ ϰϬϭ ϯϬ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϰ ϯϵϱ͘ϲϳ ϰϬϰ ϯϵϱ͘ϲϳ ϯϭ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϬϳ͘ϴ ϰϬϭ ϰϬϱ͘ϰ ϰϬϭ ϯϭ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϳ ϯϵϴ͘ϲϳ ϰϬϳ ϯϵϴ͘ϲϳ ϯϮ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϬϰ͘ϳ ϰϬϭ ϰϬϰ͘ϵ ϯϵϴ͘ϳ ϯϮ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϵ ϰϬϬ͘ϲϳ ϰϬϵ ϰϬϬ͘ϲϳ ϯϯ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϬϰ͘ϴ ϯϵϴ͘Ϯ ϰϬϳ͘ϱ ϯϵϳ͘ϱ ϯϯ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϵ͘ϱ ϰϬϭ͘ϭϳ ϰϬϵ͘ϱ ϰϬϭ͘ϭϳ ϯϰ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϭϭ͘ϵ ϰϭϬ͘ϭ ϰϬϵ͘Ϯ ϰϭϬ ϯϳϲ͘ϯ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϬϬ͘ϳϮ ϯϲϴ͘ϯϱ ϯϮ͘ϯϳ ϯϳϱ͘ϴ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϬϬ͘ϮϮ ϯϲϳ͘ϭϬ ϯϯ͘ϭϮ ϯϳϳ͘ϯ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϬϭ͘ϳϮ ϯϲϵ͘ϯϱ ϯϮ͘ϯϳ ϯϳϳ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϬϭ͘ϰϮ ϯϲϴ͘ϵϱ ϯϮ͘ϰϳ ϯϳϱ͘ϴϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϬϭ͘ϯϯ ϯϳϲ͘ϭϴ Ϯϱ͘ϭϲ ϯϳϳ͘ϯϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϬϮ͘ϴϯ ϯϳϵ͘ϲϬ Ϯϯ͘Ϯϯ ϯϳϱ͘ϯϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϬϬ͘ϴϯ ϯϳϱ͘ϴϱ Ϯϰ͘ϵϴ ϯϳϱ͘ϴϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϬϭ͘ϯϯ ϯϳϱ͘ϭϴ Ϯϲ͘ϭϲ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ ϰϭϬ͘ϴ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϯϱ͘ϮϮ ϰϬϮ͘ϬϬ ϯϯ͘ϮϮ ϰϭϮ ϯ Ϯϰ ϰϮ ϰϯϲ ϳϮ ϰϭϬ ϯϬ Ϯϲ ϰϮ ϰϬϭ͘ϯ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϮϱ͘ϳϮ ϰϬϬ͘ϴϱ Ϯϰ͘ϴϳ ϰϬϱ͘ϯ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϮϵ͘ϳϮ ϰϬϯ͘ϱϱ Ϯϲ͘ϭϳ ϰϬϴ͘ϯ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϯϮ͘ϳϮ ϰϬϯ͘ϴϬ Ϯϴ͘ϵϮ ϰϭϬ͘ϯ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϯϰ͘ϳϮ ϰϬϮ͘ϯϯ ϯϮ͘ϯϵ ϯϳϳ͘ϴϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϬϯ͘ϯϯ ϯϴϰ͘ϲϴ ϭϴ͘ϲϲ ϯϳϴ͘ϴϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϬϰ͘ϯϯ ϯϴϯ͘ϯϴ ϮϬ͘ϵϲ ϯϳϱ͘ϯϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϬϬ͘ϴϯ ϯϳϴ͘Ϭϯ ϮϮ͘ϴϬ ϯϳϱ͘ϯϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϬϬ͘ϴϯ ϯϴϮ͘ϭϱ ϭϴ͘ϲϴ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ ϯϱ͘ϭϮ ϯϰ͘ϯϳ ϯϰ͘ϰϳ ϯϰ͘ϯϳ Ϯϱ͘Ϯϯ Ϯϳ͘ϭϲ Ϯϴ͘ϭϲ Ϯϲ͘ϵϴ Ϯϰ͘ϴϬ ϮϬ͘ϲϴ ϮϬ͘ϲϲ ϮϮ͘ϵϲ Ϯϲ͘ϴϳ Ϯϴ͘ϭϳ ϯϬ͘ϵϮ ϯϰ͘ϯϵ ϯϱ͘ϮϮ Ϯϴ ϰϮ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐη ŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶ EůĞǀ͘ EtůĞǀ͘ ^ůĞǀ͘ ^tůĞǀ͘ &ŝŶŝƐŚ&ůŽŽƌ ůĞǀ͘ ,ĞŝŐŚƚĨƌŽŵ &ŝŶŝƐŚ&ůŽŽƌ ƚŽZŽŽĨ DŝĚƉŽŝŶƚ ZŽŽĨ DŝĚƉŽŝŶƚ ůĞǀ͘ ǀĞƌĂŐĞWƌĞͲ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ 'ƌĂĚĞ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ;&ƌŽŵ ƉƌĞͲĞdž͘ 'ƌĂĚĞͿ DĂdž EƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨ^ƚŽƌŝĞƐ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ZĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚ;,ĞŝŐŚƚĂƐ ĚĞĨŝŶĞĚďLJ ZĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƉůƵƐϮΖͿ ϯϰ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϭϬ͘ϲϲ ϰϭϭ ϰϭϬ͘ϲϲ ϰϭϭ ϯϱ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϭϬ͘ϱ ϰϬϴ͘ϭ ϰϭϬ͘ϰ ϰϬϴ͘ϴ ϯϱ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϴ͘ϲϲ ϰϬϵ ϰϬϴ͘ϲϲ ϰϬϵ ϯϲ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϭϭ͘ϲ ϰϬϵ͘ϴ ϰϭϬ͘ϳ ϰϬϴ͘ϰ ϯϲ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϲ͘ϭϳ ϰϬϲ͘ϱ ϰϬϲ͘ϭϳ ϰϬϲ͘ϱ ϯϳ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϭϮ͘ϵ ϰϭϭ͘ϲ ϰϭϭ͘ϰ ϰϭϬ͘ϰ ϯϳ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϭϭ ϰϬϮ ϰϭϭ ϰϬϮ ϯϴ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϭϰ͘ϰ ϰϭϮ͘ϵ ϰϭϯ͘ϯ ϰϭϭ͘ϴ ϯϴ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϴ ϯϵϵ ϰϬϴ͘ϰϲ ϯϵϵ ϯϵ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϭϰ͘ϳ ϰϭϮ͘ϴ ϰϭϰ͘ϲ ϰϭϮ͘ϵ ϯϵ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϭϭ͘ϰϲ ϰϬϮ ϰϭϬ ϰϬϭ͘ϱ ϰϬ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϭϰ͘ϭ ϰϭϮ͘ϵ ϰϭϰ͘ϵ ϰϭϮ͘ϵ ϰϬ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϭϱ͘Ϯϴ ϰϬϱ͘ϯϯ ϰϭϱ ϰϬϰ͘ϱ ϰϭ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϭϭ͘ϴ ϰϭϭ͘ϴ ϰϭϯ͘ϲ ϰϭϯ͘ϭ ϰϭ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϭϱ͘ϵϲ ϰϬϲ ϰϭϱ͘ϵϲ ϰϬϲ ϰϮ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϭϭ͘ϰ ϰϭϬ͘ϰ ϰϭϭ͘ϰ ϰϭϭ͘ϰ ϰϮ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϭϲ ϰϬϲ͘ϱ ϰϭϲ ϰϬϲ͘ϱ ϰϯ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϭϰ͘ϵ ϰϬϴ͘ϯ ϰϭϭ͘ϱ ϰϭϬ͘ϯ ϰϯ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϭϱ ϰϬϲ ϰϭϱ͘ϵϲ ϰϬϲ͘ϱ ϰϰ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϬϴ͘ϳ ϰϬϲ͘ϭ ϰϭϭ ϰϬϳ͘ϱ ϰϰ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϭϰ͘ϵϲ ϰϬϱ ϰϭϰ͘ϵϲ ϰϬϱ ϰϱ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϬϱ͘ϱ ϰϬϰ͘ϲ ϰϬϴ ϰϬϱ͘ϴ ϰϱ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϭϰ͘ϰϱ ϰϬϰ͘ϱ ϰϭϰ͘ϰϱ ϰϬϱ ϰϲ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϬϯ ϰϬϮ͘ϭ ϰϬϰ͘ϵ ϰϬϰ͘Ϯ ϰϲ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϯ͘ϲϳ ϰϬϰ ϰϬϯ͘ϲϳ ϰϬϰ ϰϳ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϬϬ͘ϴ ϯϵϵ͘Ϯ ϰϬϮ͘ϱ ϰϬϭ͘ϱ ϰϳ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϭ͘ϭϴ ϰϬϭ͘ϱ ϰϬϭ͘ϭϴ ϰϬϭ͘ϱ ϰϴ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϵϴ͘ϱ ϯϵϳ͘Ϯ ϰϬϬ͘ϴ ϯϵϴ͘ϴ ϰϴ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϬ͘ϰϮ ϰϬϬ͘ϱ ϰϬϬ͘ϰϮ ϰϬϬ͘ϱ ϰϵ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϵϱ͘ϯ ϯϵϰ͘ϰ ϯϵϳ͘ϴ ϯϵϲ͘ϱ ϰϵ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϵϳ͘Ϯϱ ϯϵϳ͘ϯϯ ϯϵϳ͘Ϯϱ ϯϵϳ͘ϯϯ ϱϬ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϵϯ͘ϳ ϯϵϬ͘ϭ ϯϵϰ͘ϱ ϯϵϮ͘ϴ ϱϬ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϮ ϯϵϯ ϰϬϬ ϯϵϯ ϱϭ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϵϱ͘ϯ ϯϴϵ͘ϵ ϯϵϯ͘ϲ ϯϴϵ ϰϬϰ͘ϴϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϯϬ͘ϯϯ ϰϬϱ͘ϵϴ Ϯϰ͘ϯϲ ϰϬϭ͘ϳϵ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϮϲ͘Ϯϭ ϯϵϴ͘ϴϯ Ϯϳ͘ϯϴ ϰϬϱ͘Ϯϵ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϮϵ͘ϳϭ ϰϬϯ͘ϱϱ Ϯϲ͘ϭϲ ϰϬϮ͘ϴ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϮϳ͘ϮϮ ϰϬϭ͘ϬϬ Ϯϲ͘ϮϮ ϰϬϲ͘ϯϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϯϭ͘ϴϯ ϰϭϭ͘Ϯϱ ϮϬ͘ϱϴ ϰϬϱ͘ϯϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϯϬ͘ϴϯ ϰϬϴ͘ϯϯ ϮϮ͘ϱϭ ϰϬϲ͘ϯϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϯϭ͘ϴϯ ϰϭϮ͘ϱϴ ϭϵ͘Ϯϱ ϰϬϲ͘ϯϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϯϭ͘ϴϯ ϰϭϭ͘ϭϱ ϮϬ͘ϲϴ ϰϬϭ͘ϴϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϮϳ͘ϯϯ ϰϭϯ͘ϳϱ ϭϯ͘ϱϴ ϰϬϱ͘ϲϲ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϯϭ͘ϭϲ ϰϭϯ͘ϳϬ ϭϳ͘ϰϲ ϰϬϮ͘ϱϴ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϮϴ͘Ϭϴ ϰϭϭ͘ϱϴ ϭϲ͘ϱϬ ϯϵϴ͘ϴϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϮϰ͘ϯϯ ϰϭϯ͘ϭϬ ϭϭ͘Ϯϯ ϰϬϳ͘ϴ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϯϮ͘ϮϮ ϰϭϬ͘ϭϯ ϮϮ͘Ϭϵ ϰϭϮ͘ϯ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϯϲ͘ϳϮ ϰϭϬ͘ϯϬ Ϯϲ͘ϰϮ ϰϭϬ͘ϯ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϯϰ͘ϳϮ ϰϬϵ͘ϰϱ Ϯϱ͘Ϯϳ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ Ϯ ϯϵϴ͘ϲϮ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϮϯ͘Ϭϰ ϯϵϲ͘ϬϬ Ϯϳ͘Ϭϰ Ϯ ϯϵϯ͘ϯϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϭϴ͘ϴϯ ϯϵϮ͘ϳϴ Ϯϲ͘Ϭϲ Ϯ ϯϵϭ ϯϯ Ϯϱ ϱϬ ϰϭϲ ϴϯ ϯϵϭ ϵϱ Ϯϰ ϴϴ Ϯ Ϯϴ͘ϰϮ Ϯϳ͘Ϯϳ Ϯϰ͘Ϭϵ ϭϴ͘ϱϬ ϭϯ͘Ϯϯ ϭϱ͘ϱϴ ϭϵ͘ϰϲ Ϯϭ͘Ϯϱ ϮϮ͘ϲϴ ϮϮ͘ϱϴ Ϯϰ͘ϱϭ Ϯϲ͘ϯϲ Ϯϴ͘ϭϲ Ϯϴ͘ϮϮ Ϯϵ͘ϯϴ Ϯϵ͘Ϭϰ Ϯϴ͘Ϭϲ Ϯϲ ϴϴ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐη ŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶ EůĞǀ͘ EtůĞǀ͘ ^ůĞǀ͘ ^tůĞǀ͘ &ŝŶŝƐŚ&ůŽŽƌ ůĞǀ͘ ,ĞŝŐŚƚĨƌŽŵ &ŝŶŝƐŚ&ůŽŽƌ ƚŽZŽŽĨ DŝĚƉŽŝŶƚ ZŽŽĨ DŝĚƉŽŝŶƚ ůĞǀ͘ ǀĞƌĂŐĞWƌĞͲ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ 'ƌĂĚĞ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ;&ƌŽŵ ƉƌĞͲĞdž͘ 'ƌĂĚĞͿ DĂdž EƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨ^ƚŽƌŝĞƐ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ZĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚ;,ĞŝŐŚƚĂƐ ĚĞĨŝŶĞĚďLJ ZĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƉůƵƐϮΖͿ ϱϭ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϬ ϯϵϭ ϰϬϬ͘ϵϲ ϯϵϭ ϱϮ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϵϯ͘ϴ ϯϴϵ͘ϳ ϯϵϱ ϯϴϵ͘Ϯ ϱϮ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϵϴ ϯϴϴ͘ϱ ϯϵϴ͘ϰϲ ϯϴϴ͘ϱ ϱϯ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϵϬ͘ϱ ϯϴϳ͘ϱ ϯϵϮ͘ϵ ϯϴϵ͘ϰ ϱϯ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϵϳ͘ϰϲ ϯϴϳ͘ϱ ϯϵϳ͘ϰϲ ϯϴϳ͘ϱ ϱϰ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϴϵ͘ϴ ϯϴϳ͘ϲ ϯϵϬ͘ϰ ϯϴϳ͘ϴ ϱϰ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϵϲ͘ϵϲ ϯϴϳ ϯϵϲ͘ϵϲ ϯϴϳ ϱϱ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϴϲ͘ϱ ϯϴϱ͘ϯ ϯϴϵ͘ϱ ϯϴϳ͘ϲ ϱϱ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϵϲ͘ϰϲ ϯϴϲ͘ϱ ϯϵϲ͘ϰϲ ϯϴϲ͘ϱ ϱϲ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϬϭ͘ϲ ϯϵϭ͘ϱ ϰϬϬ͘ϴ ϯϴϵ͘ϱ ϱϲ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϭ͘ϱ ϯϵϰ͘ϲϲ ϰϬϭ͘ϱ ϯϵϰ͘ϲϲ ϱϳ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϬϯ͘Ϯ ϯϵϮ͘ϰ ϰϬϮ͘ϯ ϯϵϭ͘ϱ ϱϳ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϰ͘ϱ ϯϵϳ͘ϲϲ ϰϬϰ͘ϱ ϯϵϳ͘ϲϲ ϱϴ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϬϯ͘ϴ ϯϵϰ͘ϲ ϰϬϯ ϯϵϮ͘ϲ ϱϴ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϱ͘ϱ ϯϵϴ͘ϲϲ ϰϬϱ͘ϱ ϯϵϴ͘ϲϲ ϱϵ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϬϰ͘ϳ ϯϵϰ͘ϱ ϰϬϰ͘ϭ ϯϵϱ͘ϭ ϱϵ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϱ͘ϳ ϯϵϴ͘ϴϲ ϰϬϱ͘ϳ ϯϵϴ͘ϴϲ ϲϬ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϬϯ ϯϵϳ͘ϴ ϰϬϰ͘ϯ ϯϵϯ͘ϳ ϲϬ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϱ͘Ϯϱ ϯϵϴ͘ϰϭ ϰϬϱ͘Ϯϱ ϯϵϴ͘ϰϭ ϲϭ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϰϬϮ͘ϴ ϯϵϵ͘ϭ ϰϬϯ͘ϭ ϯϵϵ ϲϭ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϰ͘ϱ ϯϵϳ͘ϲϲ ϰϬϰ͘ϱ ϯϵϳ͘ϲϲ ϲϮ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϵϴ͘ϵ ϯϵϳ͘ϵ ϰϬϮ ϯϵϵ ϲϮ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϰ͘ϱ ϯϵϳ͘ϲϲ ϰϬϰ͘ϱ ϯϵϳ͘ϲϲ ϲϯ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϵϲ͘ϯ ϯϵϰ͘ϳ ϯϵϳ͘ϵ ϯϵϳ͘ϳ ϲϯ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϵϲ͘ϰϭ ϰϬϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϵϲ͘ϰϭ ϲϰ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϵϰ͘Ϯ ϯϵϭ͘ϰ ϯϵϰ͘ϵ ϯϵϰ͘ϭ ϲϰ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϰϬϬ ϯϵϯ͘ϭϲ ϰϬϬ ϯϵϯ͘ϭϲ ϲϱͬϲϲ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϵϯ͘ϳ ϯϴϵ͘ϱ ϯϵϯ͘ϯ ϯϴϴ͘ϵ ϲϱͬϲϲ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϵϳ͘ϯϯ ϯϴϵ ϯϵϳ͘ϯϯ ϯϴϵ ϲϳͬϲϴ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϴϲ͘ϵ ϯϴϮ͘ϱ ϯϵϭ͘ϰ ϯϴϳ͘ϲ ϲϳͬϲϴ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϵϰ͘ϱ ϯϴϰ͘ϭϳ ϯϵϰ͘ϱ ϯϴϰ͘ϭϳ ϲϵͬϳϬ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϴϮ͘ϴ ϯϳϴ͘ϳ ϯϴϱ͘ϲ ϯϴϭ͘ϯ ϲϵͬϳϬ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϵϭ͘Ϯϱ ϯϴϮ͘ϵϮ ϯϵϭ͘Ϯϱ ϯϴϮ͘ϵϮ ϳϭͬϳϮ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϴϰ͘ϭ ϯϳϵ͘Ϯ ϯϴϯ͘Ϯ ϯϳϳ͘ϳ ϯϵϭ͘ϯϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϭϲ͘ϴϯ ϯϵϭ͘ϵϱ Ϯϰ͘ϴϴ Ϯ ϯϴϴ͘ϴϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϭϰ͘ϯϯ ϯϵϭ͘ϵϯ ϮϮ͘ϰϭ Ϯ ϯϴϳ͘ϴϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϭϯ͘ϯϯ ϯϵϬ͘Ϭϴ Ϯϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ ϯϴϳ͘ϯϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϭϮ͘ϴϯ ϯϴϴ͘ϵϬ Ϯϯ͘ϵϯ Ϯ ϯϴϲ͘ϴϯ Ϯϱ͘ϱϬ ϰϭϮ͘ϯϯ ϯϴϳ͘Ϯϯ Ϯϱ͘ϭϭ Ϯ ϰϬϮ͘ϴ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϮϳ͘ϮϮ ϯϵϱ͘ϴϱ ϯϭ͘ϯϳ Ϯ ϰϬϱ͘ϴ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϯϬ͘ϮϮ ϯϵϳ͘ϯϱ ϯϮ͘ϴϳ Ϯ ϰϬϲ͘ϴ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϯϭ͘ϮϮ ϯϵϴ͘ϱϬ ϯϮ͘ϳϮ Ϯ ϰϬϳ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϯϭ͘ϰϮ ϯϵϵ͘ϲϬ ϯϭ͘ϴϮ Ϯ ϰϬϲ͘ϱϱ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϯϬ͘ϵϳ ϯϵϵ͘ϳϬ ϯϭ͘Ϯϳ Ϯ ϰϬϱ͘ϴ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϯϬ͘ϮϮ ϰϬϭ͘ϬϬ Ϯϵ͘ϮϮ Ϯ ϰϬϱ͘ϴ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϯϬ͘ϮϮ ϯϵϵ͘ϰϱ ϯϬ͘ϳϳ Ϯ ϰϬϰ͘ϱϲ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϮϴ͘ϵϴ ϯϵϲ͘ϲϱ ϯϮ͘ϯϯ Ϯ ϰϬϭ͘ϯ Ϯϰ͘ϰϮ ϰϮϱ͘ϳϮ ϯϵϯ͘ϲϱ ϯϮ͘Ϭϳ Ϯ ϯϵϴ͘ϲϯ Ϯϰ͘ϬϬ ϰϮϮ͘ϲϯ ϯϵϭ͘ϯϱ ϯϭ͘Ϯϴ Ϯ ϯϵϱ͘ϴ Ϯϰ͘ϬϬ ϰϭϵ͘ϴϬ ϯϴϳ͘ϭϬ ϯϮ͘ϳϬ Ϯ ϯϵϮ͘ϱ Ϯϰ͘ϬϬ ϰϭϲ͘ϱϬ ϯϴϮ͘ϭϬ ϯϰ͘ϰϬ Ϯ ϯϴϵ ϱϴ Ϯϰ ϬϬ ϰϭϯ ϱϴ ϯϴϭ Ϭϱ ϯϮ ϱϯ Ϯ Ϯϲ͘ϴϴ Ϯϰ͘ϰϭ Ϯϱ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϱ͘ϵϯ Ϯϳ͘ϭϭ ϯϯ͘ϯϳ ϯϰ͘ϴϳ ϯϰ͘ϳϮ ϯϯ͘ϴϮ ϯϯ͘Ϯϳ ϯϭ͘ϮϮ ϯϮ͘ϳϳ ϯϰ͘ϯϯ ϯϰ͘Ϭϳ ϯϯ͘Ϯϴ ϯϰ͘ϳϬ ϯϲ͘ϰϬ ϯϰ ϱϯ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐη ŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶ EůĞǀ͘ EtůĞǀ͘ ^ůĞǀ͘ ^tůĞǀ͘ &ŝŶŝƐŚ&ůŽŽƌ ůĞǀ͘ ,ĞŝŐŚƚĨƌŽŵ &ŝŶŝƐŚ&ůŽŽƌ ƚŽZŽŽĨ DŝĚƉŽŝŶƚ ZŽŽĨ DŝĚƉŽŝŶƚ ůĞǀ͘ ǀĞƌĂŐĞWƌĞͲ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ 'ƌĂĚĞ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ;&ƌŽŵ ƉƌĞͲĞdž͘ 'ƌĂĚĞͿ DĂdž EƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨ^ƚŽƌŝĞƐ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ZĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚ;,ĞŝŐŚƚĂƐ ĚĞĨŝŶĞĚďLJ ZĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƉůƵƐϮΖͿ ϳϭͬϳϮ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϴϴ͘ϯϯ ϯϴϬ ϯϴϴ͘ϯϯ ϯϴϬ ϳϯͬϳϰ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϴϭ ϯϳϳ ϯϴϮ ϯϳϴ͘ϴ ϳϯͬϳϰ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϴϲ͘ϳϱ ϯϳϴ͘ϰϮ ϯϴϲ͘ϳϱ ϯϳϴ͘ϰϮ ϳϱͬϳϲ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϲϮ͘Ϯ ϯϱϲ ϯϲϮ͘ϴ ϯϱϳ͘ϰ ϳϱͬϳϲ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϲϮ͘ϵ ϯϱϯ ϯϲϮ͘ϵ ϯϱϯ ϳϳͬϳϴ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϲϮ ϯϱϮ͘ϱ ϯϲϮ͘ϱ ϯϱϲ ϳϳͬϳϴ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϲϭ͘ϳ ϯϱϭ͘ϴ ϯϲϭ͘ϳ ϯϱϭ͘ϴ ϳϵͬϴϬ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϲϯ͘ϭ ϯϱϯ͘ϱ ϯϲϮ͘ϲ ϯϱϮ͘ϭ ϳϵͬϴϬ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϲϭ͘ϭϲ ϯϱϭ͘Ϯ ϯϲϭ͘ϭϲ ϯϱϭ͘Ϯ ϴϭͬϴϮ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϲϯ͘ϱ ϯϱϯ ϯϲϯ͘ϱ ϯϱϮ͘ϵ ϴϭͬϴϮ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϲϬ ϯϱϬ͘ϵ ϯϲϬ͘ϯ ϯϱϬ͘ϴ ϴϯͬϴϰ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϱϳ͘ϴ ϯϱϭ͘ϴ ϯϲϯ ϯϱϮ͘ϳ ϴϯͬϴϰ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϵ͘ϲϮ ϯϱϬ ϯϱϵ͘ϲϮ ϯϱϬ ϴϱͬϴϲ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϱϴ͘ϰ ϯϱϰ ϯϱϳ ϯϱϭ͘ϲ ϴϱͬϴϲ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϵ͘ϱ ϯϰϵ͘ϱ ϯϱϵ͘ϱ ϯϰϵ͘ϱ ϴϳͬϴϴ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϱϳ͘ϱ ϯϱϭ͘ϴ ϯϱϴ͘ϳ ϯϱϯ͘ϲ ϴϳͬϴϴ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϴ͘ϭϱ ϯϰϴ͘Ϯ ϯϱϴ͘ϭϱ ϯϰϴ͘Ϯ ϴϵͬϵϬ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϲϬ͘ϯ ϯϱϳ ϯϱϳ͘ϲ ϯϱϯ͘ϭ ϴϵͬϵϬ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϵ͘Ϯ ϯϰϵ͘Ϯϱ ϯϱϵ͘Ϯ ϯϰϵ͘Ϯϱ ϵϭͬϵϮ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϲϯ͘ϱ ϯϱϴ͘ϵ ϯϲϭ͘ϭ ϯϱϳ͘ϲ ϵϭͬϵϮ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϲϭ͘ϵϲ ϯϱϱϮ ϯϲϬ ϯϱϮ ϵϯͬϵϰ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϲϱ ϯϲϭ͘ϭ ϯϲϰ͘ϭ ϯϱϵ͘Ϯ ϵϯͬϵϰ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϲϰ͘ϳ ϯϱϰ͘ϳϱ ϯϲϰ ϯϱϰ͘ϳϱ ϵϱͬϵϲ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϲϰ͘ϵ ϯϲϬ͘Ϯ ϯϲϲ͘Ϯ ϯϲϭ͘ϭ ϵϱͬϵϲ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϲϲ͘ϯϲ ϯϱϳ ϯϲϲ ϯϱϲ͘ϰ ϵϳͬϵϴ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϰϱ͘ϵ ϯϰϭ͘ϯ ϯϰϴ͘ϳ ϯϰϰ͘ϯ ϵϳͬϵϴ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϮ ϯϰϯ͘ϲϳ ϯϱϮ ϯϰϯ͘ϲϳ ϵϵͬϭϬϬ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϰϰ͘ϴ ϯϰϬ ϯϰϲ͘ϭ ϯϰϭ͘ϭ ϵϵͬϭϬϬ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϭ͘ϱ ϯϰϯ͘ϭϳ ϯϱϭ͘ϱ ϯϰϯ͘ϭϳ ϭϬϭͬϭϬϮ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϰϰ͘ϭ ϯϯϳ͘ϲ ϯϰϰ͘ϵ ϯϰϬ͘ϰ ϭϬϭͬϭϬϮ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϬ͘ϳϱ ϯϰϮ͘ϰϮ ϯϱϬ͘ϳϱ ϯϰϮ͘ϰϮ ϭϬϯͬϭϬϰ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϰϮ͘ϳ ϯϰϯ͘ϲ ϯϰϯ ϯϯϲ͘ϴ ϭϬϯͬϭϬϰ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϬ ϯϰϭ͘Ϯ ϯϱϬ ϯϰϭ͘Ϯ ϭϬϱͬϭϬϲ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϯϵ͘ϴ ϯϯϰ͘ϲ ϯϰϭ͘ϰ ϯϯϰ͘ϵ ϯϴϵ͘ϱϴ Ϯϰ͘ϬϬ ϰϭϯ͘ϱϴ ϯϴϭ͘Ϭϱ ϯϮ͘ϱϯ Ϯ ϯϴϴ͘Ϭϱ Ϯϰ͘ϬϬ ϰϭϮ͘Ϭϱ ϯϳϵ͘ϳϬ ϯϮ͘ϯϱ Ϯ ϯϱϯ͘ϯϯ ϯϯ͘ϱϴ ϯϴϲ͘ϵϭ ϯϱϵ͘ϲϬ Ϯϳ͘ϯϭ ϯ ϯϱϮ͘ϭϯ ϯϯ͘ϱϴ ϯϴϱ͘ϳϭ ϯϱϴ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϳ͘ϰϲ ϯ ϯϱϭ͘ϱϯ ϯϯ͘ϱϴ ϯϴϱ͘ϭϭ ϯϱϳ͘ϴϯ Ϯϳ͘Ϯϵ ϯ ϯϱϬ͘ϳϯ ϯϯ͘ϱϴ ϯϴϰ͘ϯϭ ϯϱϴ͘Ϯϯ Ϯϲ͘Ϭϵ ϯ ϯϱϬ ϯϯ͘ϱϴ ϯϴϯ͘ϱϴ ϯϱϲ͘ϯϯ Ϯϳ͘Ϯϲ ϯ ϯϰϵ͘ϴϯ ϯϯ͘ϱϴ ϯϴϯ͘ϰϭ ϯϱϱ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϴ͘ϭϲ ϯ ϯϰϴ͘ϱϯ ϯϯ͘ϱϴ ϯϴϮ͘ϭϭ ϯϱϱ͘ϰϬ Ϯϲ͘ϳϭ ϯ ϯϰϵ͘ϱϴ ϯϯ͘ϱϴ ϯϴϯ͘ϭϲ ϯϱϳ͘ϬϬ Ϯϲ͘ϭϲ ϯ ϯϱϮ͘ϯϯ ϯϯ͘ϱϴ ϯϴϱ͘ϵϭ ϯϲϬ͘Ϯϴ Ϯϱ͘ϲϰ ϯ ϯϱϱ͘Ϭϱ ϯϯ͘ϱϴ ϯϴϴ͘ϲϯ ϯϲϮ͘ϯϱ Ϯϲ͘Ϯϴ ϯ ϯϱϲ͘ϳϯ ϯϯ͘ϱϴ ϯϵϬ͘ϯϭ ϯϲϯ͘ϭϬ Ϯϳ͘Ϯϭ ϯ ϯϱϯ͘ϯ Ϯϰ͘ϬϬ ϯϳϳ͘ϯϬ ϯϰϱ͘Ϭϱ ϯϮ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ ϯϱϮ͘ϴ Ϯϰ͘ϬϬ ϯϳϲ͘ϴϬ ϯϰϯ͘ϬϬ ϯϯ͘ϴϬ Ϯ ϯϱϮ Ϯϰ͘ϬϬ ϯϳϲ͘ϬϬ ϯϰϭ͘ϳϱ ϯϰ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ ϯϱϭ͘ϯ Ϯϰ͘ϬϬ ϯϳϱ͘ϯϬ ϯϰϭ͘ϱϯ ϯϯ͘ϳϴ Ϯ ϯϱϬ ϱϱ Ϯϰ ϬϬ ϯϳϰ ϱϱ ϯϯϳ ϲϴ ϯϲ ϴϴ Ϯ ϯϰ͘ϱϯ ϯϰ͘ϯϱ Ϯϵ͘ϯϭ Ϯϵ͘ϰϲ Ϯϵ͘Ϯϵ Ϯϴ͘Ϭϵ Ϯϵ͘Ϯϲ ϯϬ͘ϭϲ Ϯϴ͘ϳϭ Ϯϴ͘ϭϲ Ϯϳ͘ϲϰ Ϯϴ͘Ϯϴ Ϯϵ͘Ϯϭ ϯϰ͘Ϯϱ ϯϱ͘ϴϬ ϯϲ͘Ϯϱ ϯϱ͘ϳϴ ϯϴ ϴϴ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐη ŽŶĚŝƚŝŽŶ EůĞǀ͘ EtůĞǀ͘ ^ůĞǀ͘ ^tůĞǀ͘ &ŝŶŝƐŚ&ůŽŽƌ ůĞǀ͘ ,ĞŝŐŚƚĨƌŽŵ &ŝŶŝƐŚ&ůŽŽƌ ƚŽZŽŽĨ DŝĚƉŽŝŶƚ ZŽŽĨ DŝĚƉŽŝŶƚ ůĞǀ͘ ǀĞƌĂŐĞWƌĞͲ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ 'ƌĂĚĞ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ,ĞŝŐŚƚ;&ƌŽŵ ƉƌĞͲĞdž͘ 'ƌĂĚĞͿ DĂdž EƵŵďĞƌ ŽĨ^ƚŽƌŝĞƐ ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ,ĞŝŐŚƚ ZĞƋƵĞƐƚĞĚ;,ĞŝŐŚƚĂƐ ĚĞĨŝŶĞĚďLJ ZĞŐƵůĂƚŝŽŶƐ͕ƉůƵƐϮΖͿ ϭϬϱͬϭϬϲ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϰϵ͘Ϯϱ ϯϰϬ͘ϵϭ ϯϰϵ͘Ϯϱ ϯϰϬ͘ϵϭ ϭϬϳͬϭϬϴ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϰϭ ϯϯϳ͘ϯ ϯϰϬ͘ϭ ϯϯϱ͘Ϯ ϭϬϳͬϭϬϴ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϰϴ͘Ϯϱ ϯϯϵ͘ϵϭ ϯϰϴ͘Ϯϱ ϯϯϵ͘ϵϭ ϭϬϵͬϭϭϬ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϰϯ͘ϰ ϯϯϵ͘ϭ ϯϯϵ͘ϭ ϯϯϲ͘ϲ ϭϬϵͬϭϭϬ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϰϴ ϯϯϵ͘ϲϳ ϯϰϴ ϯϯϵ͘ϲϳ ϭϭϭͬϭϭϮ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϰϳ͘ϲ ϯϰϮ ϯϰϰ͘ϭ ϯϯϴ͘ϱ ϭϭϭͬϭϭϮ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϬ ϯϰϭ͘ϲϳ ϯϱϬ ϯϰϭ͘ϲϳ ϭϭϯͬϭϭϰ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϰϳ͘ϰ ϯϰϮ͘ϳ ϯϰϳ ϯϰϬ͘ϱ ϭϭϯͬϭϭϰ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϮ͘ϱ ϯϰϰ͘ϭϳ ϯϱϮ͘ϱ ϯϰϰ͘ϭϳ ϭϭϱͬϭϭϲ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϰϵ͘ϭ ϯϰϰ͘ϲ ϯϰϳ͘ϯ ϯϰϭ͘ϵ ϭϭϱͬϭϭϲ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϱ͘Ϯ ϯϰϲ͘ϴϳ ϯϱϱ͘Ϯ ϯϰϲ͘ϴϳ ϭϭϳͬϭϭϴ džŝƐƚŝŶŐ ŐƌŽƵŶĚ ϯϱϬ͘ϴ ϯϰϲ͘ϲ ϯϰϴ ϯϰϯ͘ϰ ϭϭϳͬϭϭϴ &ŝŶŝƐŚŐƌĂĚĞ ϯϱϲ͘ϱ ϯϰϴ͘ϭϳ ϯϱϲ͘ϱ ϯϰϴ͘ϭϳ ϯϱϬ͘ϱϱ Ϯϰ͘ϬϬ ϯϳϰ͘ϱϱ ϯϯϳ͘ϲϴ ϯϲ͘ϴϴ Ϯ ϯϰϵ͘ϱϱ Ϯϰ͘ϬϬ ϯϳϯ͘ϱϱ ϯϯϴ͘ϰϬ ϯϱ͘ϭϱ Ϯ ϯϰϵ͘ϯ Ϯϰ͘ϬϬ ϯϳϯ͘ϯϬ ϯϯϵ͘ϱϱ ϯϯ͘ϳϱ Ϯ ϯϱϭ͘ϯ Ϯϰ͘ϬϬ ϯϳϱ͘ϯϬ ϯϰϯ͘Ϭϱ ϯϮ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ ϯϱϳ͘ϴ Ϯϰ͘ϬϬ ϯϴϭ͘ϴϬ ϯϰϳ͘ϮϬ ϯϰ͘ϲϬ Ϯ ϯϱϯ͘ϴ Ϯϰ͘ϬϬ ϯϳϳ͘ϴϬ ϯϰϰ͘ϰϬ ϯϯ͘ϰϬ Ϯ ϯϱϲ͘ϱ Ϯϰ͘ϬϬ ϯϴϬ͘ϱϬ ϯϰϱ͘ϳϯ ϯϰ͘ϳϴ Ϯ ϯϲ͘ϲϬ ϯϴ͘ϴϴ ϯϳ͘ϭϱ ϯϱ͘ϳϱ ϯϰ͘Ϯϱ ϯϱ͘ϰϬ ϯϲ͘ϳϴ VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL July 28, 2017 South Burlington Development Review Board C/O Mr. Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Impact Fee Waiver Request for O’Brien Farm Road, Phase I Project Dear Board Members, As you know, the O’Brien Farm Road project currently being reviewed by the South Burlington Development Review Board, includes provisions for a city park, and play structures. In discussions with the City, this contribution by the Applicant allows for a credit against recreation impact fees. Per the calculation of the Planning and Zoning Staff, the total credit allowed for the proposed park is $8,364.00. Further to Section 8 of the May 19, 2014 Impact Fee Analysis Report, the Applicant in this project requests a credit for “in kind” contributions, for each unit proposed in the project until the total credit of $8,364.00 is reached. We understand that the board must account for this request in its decision, such that the City Council may grant the request. We appreciate your consideration, and we look forward to an in-depth discussion of the details of this application next week. Sincerely, Andrew Gill, Director of Development Enclosures DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 JULY 2017 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 18 July 2017, at 7:00 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. MEMBERS PRESENT: B. Miller, Chair; J. Smith, D. Parsons, J. Wilking, M. Cota, F. Kochman, M. Behr (by phone) ALSO PRESENT: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; P. Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning; M. Keen, Development Planner; D. Marshall S. Dopp, D. Fleming, M. Costello, C. Griffin, J. Weith, B. Shearer J. Dextradeur, E. Langfeldt, B. & K. Whitby, G. Philibert, J. Goodwin, T. Rich 1. Directions on emergency evacuation procedures from conference room: Mr. Miller provided directions on emergency evacuation procedures. 2. Additions, deletions, or changes in order of agenda items: No changes were made to the Agenda. 3. Comments & Questions from the public not related to the Agenda: Ms. Dopp told the Board that UVM issued an RFP to develop two parcels near Swift and Spear (the Edlund and Martin parcels). The RFPs are due on 18 August with a decision to be made by UVM on 18 September. Ms. Dopp noted that the Edlund property is zoned IA, which would require a zoning change for residential development. The Martin property is zoned for residential. Ms. Dopp wished that the city could weigh in on what they would like there as there are unique features to both properties. Mr. Belair noted that any re-zoning would start with the Planning Commission. 4. Announcements: Mr. Conner introduced Marla Keene, the new Development Review Planner. 5. Final Plat Application #SD-17-15 of City of South Burlington to subdivide a 104 acre lot (Wheeler Nature Park) into three lots of 96.75 acres (lot #1), 6.91 acres (lot #2) and 0.34 acres (lot #3), 100 Dorset Street: DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 JULY 2017 PAGE 2 Mr. Conner reviewed the history of this application, noting that it is part of a legal settlement involving a land swap (next agenda item) which was approved by voters. This action will resolve the Master Plan litigation. Mr. Conner indicated the 2 properties that will be transferred to JAM Golf. The remaining 96 acres stays as Wheeler Nature Park. Mr. Conner also indicated the beginning of the other piece adjacent to this parcel which will be transferred to the city as part of the land swap. Ms. Griffin asked if there is an established intention for the subdivided parcels. Mr. Marshall said there will be a future application brought to the DRB that has zoning specific to this site, and there will be residential development at some time. No issues were raised by the Board. Mr. Cota moved to close #SD-17-15. Mr. Wilking seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Final Plat Application #SD-17-16 of JAM Golf, LLC, to amend a planned unit development consisting of 273 residential units and an 18-hole golf course. The amendment consists of subdividing a 69.87 acre lot (parcel F) into two lots of 47.99 acres and 21.88 acres, 236 Golf Course Road: Mr. Marshall said this property is adjacent to the Wheeler parcel and will create a north/south corridor for wildlife. It also creates a buffer to the Oak Creek and Butler Farms developments. It has been identified as equal in value to the land swapped on the Wheeler property. Mr. Marshall noted that there is a rec path on this property. A small portion of rec path on an adjacent property will be moved by the applicant to this property. The existing pond in the middle of the parcel will be maintained. The intended use of the property is primarily open space. Mr. Kochman asked what value the property has to the city. Mr. Conner said it maintains a wildlife corridor. He indicated where development had previously been proposed and that will now be kept open. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 JULY 2017 PAGE 3 Mr. Fleming noted the pond is an integral part of the stormwater system in the area. He asked if it will be maintained by the golf course after it becomes city property. It was noted that the application gives the applicant the right to maintain the pond and the underground pipe, and the draft decision addresses the easements involved in this. Mr. Kochman asked if there is an obligation the city can enforce. Mr. Marshall said the state permit obligates the applicant to maintain the pond. An agreement is being worked out as to the sharing of costs. Ms. Griffin asked if the pond is also the location of the pump. Mr. Marshall said it is. The pump is a transfer pump which transfers water from this pond to the main pond if the latter gets low. No other issues were raised. Mr. Cota moved to close #SD-17-16. Mr. Kochman seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Continued site plan review application #SP-17-34 of 1775 Shelburne Road, LLC, for approval to construct a 15,030 sq. ft. retail building, 1775 Shelburne Road: Mr. Marshall said they have submitted a revised site plan and elevations which address DRB concerns. They also have submitted actual traffic counts from one of the applicant’s other locations. Specific changes include: a. The addition of stairs in the location indicated by the Board (this is in addition to the ramp) b. Changes in glazing and a variety in colors on the face of the building (elevations were shown indicating this). Member felt these changes addressed their concerns. c. Relocation of some landscaping d. Updating of the stormwater system to increase infiltration by accessing a sandy layer beneath the surface (this will be maintained by the applicant and was approved by the Stormwater Superintendent) A 17% parking waiver is being requested. It was noted that the Board has the ability to waive up to 25%. Mr. Marshall noted that they used to be required to meet the minimum standard, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 JULY 2017 PAGE 4 but since the actual need is less, staff is supporting the waiver in order to maintain more pervious surface. Mr. Miller noted that staff is OK with the traffic number which result from a study done at another of the applicant’s sites. Mr. Marshall advised that the applicant is willing to place a bike rack in conformance with the new rules, even though those rules do not apply to this application. No other issues were raised. Mr. Cota moved to close #SP-17-34. Ms. Smith seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Conditional Use Application #CU-17-06 and Site Plan Review Application #SP-17-41 of Shearer Automotive to amend a previously approved plan for a 12,503 sq. ft. building used for personal instruction use. The amendment consists of using the parking area for commercial parking with the building having no approved use, 1475 Shelburne Road: Mr. Weith said the purpose of the application is to change the use of the former O’Brien Training Center and use it for parking overflow vehicles from the Shearer dealerships. There will be no changes to the property, and the building will remain vacant. Vehicles will be parked on existing paved areas. Mr. Shearer noted the building is up for sale, but he does not intend to buy it. He is just renting the parking area. No issues were raised. Mr. Cota moved to close #CU-17-06 and #SP-17-41. Mr. Wilking seconded. Motion passed unanimously. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 JULY 2017 PAGE 5 9. Master Plan Application #MP-17-01 of O’Brien Farm Road, LLC, to amend a previously approved master plan for a planned unit development to develop 39.16 acres with a maximum of 458 dwelling units and 45,000 sq. ft. of office space. The amendment is to revise the language of the previous approval regarding pedestrian easements and clarifying language regarding future reviews where site plan review is only required, 255 Kennedy Drive: Mr. Belair noted the applicant has agreed to the new language. No issues were raised. Mr. Cota moved to close #MP-17-01. Ms. Smith seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10. Continued appeal #AO-17-01 of Burlington International Airport (BIA)/City of Burlington (COB) appealing the issuance of Notice of Violation #NV-17-01 by the Administrative Officer alleging a zoning violation at 3060 Williston Road; and 11. Continued appeal #AO-17-02 of Burlington International Airport (BIA)/City of Burlington (COB) appealing the issuance of Notice of Violation #NV-17-02 by the Administrative Officer alleging a zoning violation at Valley Road (quarry north of 3060 and 3064 Williston Road): Mr. Belair advised that both appeals have been withdrawn. 12. Minutes of 20 June 2017: Mr. Cota moved to approve the Minutes of 20 June 2017 as written. Mr. Wilking seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 13. Other Business: No other issues were raised. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 JULY 2017 PAGE 5 As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned by common consent at 8:15 p.m. _____________________________________ Clerk _____________________________________ Date