Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - Development Review Board - 02/02/2016 SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEETING MINUTES 2 FEBRUARY 2016 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 2 February 2016, at 7:00 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. MEMBERS PRESENT: T. Barritt, Chair; M. Behr, B. Miller, J. Smith, J. Wilking, M. Cota ALSO PRESENT: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; P. Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning; P. Nowak, T. Chittenden, D. Young, J. Beatty, J. Leinwohl, R. Perkett, J. Weber, J. Merone, D. Boedy, L. Willey, D. Wheeler, R. Roche 1. Additions, deletions, or changes in order of agenda items: Members agree to hear item #6 prior to #4 to accommodate the applicant. 2. Comments & Questions from the public not related to the Agenda: No issues were raised. 3. Announcements: Mr. Barritt stated: “As I have said in previous announcements, I would be willing to recuse myself if requested from any of the applications that I posted to the Facebook pages. There has been a request from Mr. Farrell for me to recuse myself from the Allenwood applications and since he copied Joe Larkin but Joe Larkin did not sign the letter, I’m assuming he means that Joe Larkin is on board as well. At this point, I’m going to announce that in the future when these applications come back for whatever level, I will be recusing myself”. 4. Site plan application #SP-16-01 of The Village at Dorset Park Homeowners Association to amend a previously approved plan for a 167 unit residential complex. The amendment consists of upgrading the community stormwater system, Swift Street Extension: The applicant noted a previous approval has expired. The current plan is very similar to what was approved on in March, 2015. There are some minor changes to pond gradings, shapes and sizes, but the function and flow of water is the same. The applicant said the Homeowner’s Association is requesting that the city take over the ponds, which must be brought up to state standards for that to happen. No issues were raised by the Board or members of the public. Mr. Miller moved to close #SP-16-01. Mr. Wilking seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site Plan Application #SP-15-79 of Jon Svitarsky to amend a previously approved plan for a 7,020 sq. ft. building used as a radio and television station. The amendment consists of converting the building to a Group Home (community residence) use to house a maximum of 25 residents, 372 Dorset Street: Mr. Barritt stressed that there are specific items which the Board can discuss. Because of ADA issues, they cannot address or entertain questions regarding who will be using the building, hours of operation, etc. Mr. Wilking disclosed that Mr. Svitarsky had called him regarding some funding for this project. He did not feel he needed to recuse himself. Board members agreed. Mr. Svitarsky said there will be no outside changes to the building, except for the removal of signs. They will, however, be putting in a sprinkler system to satisfy the Fire Chief. This is not a simple tie-in to the water line and will require considerable digging. The details of that are not yet completed, so the application will probably have to be continued until those details are known. Mr. Svitarsky noted they are a private organization and get no tax dollars. They want to be good neighbors. They have previously founded the Burlington Emergency Shelter and other similar projects. They will be willing to answer privately any questions that aren’t relevant here tonight. Mr. Svitarsky stressed that this will be a very quiet place to help people who are homeless solve their issues. Mr. Barritt asked how waste/recycling/composting will be handled. Mr. Svitarsky said there will be an area within the building for that. They will deliver trash to the landfill themselves. In answer to another question, he added that snow will be hauled off site. Mr. Barritt asked if they would put in a door facing Dorset Street. Mr. Svitarsky said they don’t plan to do that as there are already 2 adequate doors. Mr. Barritt asked if the building would be painted. Mr. Svitarsky said they would be happy to, but they are trying to focus on internal needs. Mr. Behr suggested taking up some asphalt and putting in some plantings near the doorway. Mr. Belair said the applicant could ask for advice from a landscape professional to do that. Mr. Cota asked whether the outdoor equipment from the radio/TV station would be taken down. Mr. Svitarsky said they are welcome to come and get it. Mr. Belair said that if the applicant wanted to increase the number of guests, they would have to come back to the Board with that request. Mr. Behr added that if they wanted to convert the back storage area for living, they would have to add windows. Members felt the back building should be painted to match the vinyl siding on the front building. The Board was OK with the proposed traffic pattern and with removing parking space #19. Mr. Barritt suggested repainting the parking space lines. Mr. Belair noted that the landlord has been using the back building for some storage. That is not allowed as that building can only be used in connection with approved uses on the property. No other issues were raised by the Board or the public. Mr. Miller moved to continue #SP-15-79 until 1 March. Mr. Wilking seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Sketch plan application #SP-15-47 of City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport to amend a previously approved plan for an airport complex. The amendment consists of: 1) razing an existing car wash facility, 2) constructing a new 11,665 sq. ft. auto rental car wash facility, and 3) constructing a 5,970 sq. ft. 12-position fueling canopy, 1200 Airport Drive: Mr. Leinwohl showed the location on the plan. The existing carwash/maintenance facility is used by 2 car rental agencies. The new facility will be essentially the same but will be used by 3 car rental agencies. It will be at the end of the lot (Mr. Leinwohl showed the location) and will consist of 3 wash bays and 3 maintenance bays. There will also be small offices for each of the rental companies. Mr. Leinwohl indicated the queueing lanes. He said this will be better organized than at present. There will also be a new fuel tank. Mr. Leinwohl indicated the location of the fueling islands. The old tank will come out. There will not be any public use of this facility. The new car wash will be more efficient, state of the art. They will recycle much of the wash water for re-use. Rinse water will go into the sewer system. There will be an aesthetically pleasing fence around the facility. The Airport is talking with the city about landscaping, possibly coming up with another location in an area where houses were removed. Mr. Belair noted there is a meeting with the applicant’s landscape architect on this. Mr. Conner added that the Chamberlin Neighborhood Airport Planning Committee is looking at some neighborhood enhancements, which might be a good way to meet both Airport and neighborhood goals. Mr. Barritt asked about coverage numbers. Mr. Belair said the property is so large they don’t know what the coverage is. Mr. Leinwohl said if anything, there would be a decrease in coverage with this plan. Mr. Leinwohl then showed an artist’s rendering of the new buildings, noting some similarity to the parking garage (shape of awnings, etc.). He did not anticipate any outside signage. Mr. Britt asked about stormwater. Mr. Leinwohl said the surface is all impervious now with about 1/3 of the stormwater being treated. In the future, it will all be treated, and the will surpass the requirements that are outlined. No other issues were raised by the Board or the public. Mr. Leinwohl asked about combining preliminary and final plat. Members were OK with that request. 7. Minutes of 15 December 2015 and 5 January 2016: The Minutes were not available for approval. 8. Other Business: No issues were raised. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned by common consent at 8:20 p.m. , Clerk 02/16/2016 , Date Published by ClerkBase ©2019 by Clerkbase. No Claim to Original Government Works. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com MEMORANDUM DATE: January 29, 2016 TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer SUBJECT: #SP-16-01 The Village at Dorset Park Homeowners Association - Swift Street Extension February 2, 2016 DRB Meeting. Site plan application #SP-16-01 of The Village at Dorset Park Homeowners Association to amend a previously approved plan for a 167 unit residential complex. The amendment consists of upgrading the community stormwater system, Swift Street Extension. The application is similar to #SP-15-06 approved by the Board and signed on April 10, 2015. The applicant failed to obtain a zoning permit within 6 months of approval. However, as always, this draft decision is just that and the Board should feel free to make any changes to the draft decision. #SP-16-01 SP_16_01_SwiftStreetExtension_VillageAtDorsetPark_stormwater_ffd.doc - 1 – CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING VILLAGE AT DORSET PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION – SWIFT STREET EXTENSION SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-16-01 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Site plan application #SP-16-01 of The Village at Dorset Park Homeowners Association to amend a previously approved plan for a 167 unit residential complex. The amendment consists of upgrading the community stormwater system, Swift Street Extension The Board held a public hearing on February 2, 2016. The applicant was represented by Cliff Collins. Based on the plans and materials contained in the document file for this application, the Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant, The Village at Dorset Park Homeowners Association is seeking site plan approval to Association to amend a previously approved plan for a 167 unit residential complex. The amendment consists of upgrading the community stormwater system, Swift Street Extension. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is The Village at Dorset Park Homeowners Association. 3. The subject property is located in the SEQ-Neighborhood Residential Zoning District. 4. The application was received on January 4, 2016. 5. The application is nearly identical to #SP-15-06 approved by the Board and signed on April 10, 2015. The applicant failed to obtain a zoning permit within 6 months of approval. 6. The plan submitted consists of six (6) pages, page one entitled “OVERALL SITE PLAN Village at Dorset Park Pond Improvements Swift Street Extension South Burlington, Vermont” prepared by Ruggiano Engineering, Inc. dated 1/24/15 and last revised on 1/29/16. DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Not applicable. Site Plan Review Standards A. Relationship of Proposed Development to the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Due attention by the applicant should be given to the goals and objectives and the stated land use policies for the City of South Burlington as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. DRAFT #SP-16-01 SP_16_01_SwiftStreetExtension_VillageAtDorsetPark_stormwater_ffd.doc - 2 – The Board finds the proposed improvements to the stormwater system to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. B. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site. (1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. 2) Parking: (a) …….. (b) ………… (c) ………… (d) ………… (3) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or anticipated adjoining buildings. (4) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansion shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. The proposed improvements have little impact on the relationship of the proposed structures to the site. The Board finds this criterion to be met. C. Relationship of Structures and Site to Adjoining Area. (1) The Development Review Board shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics (e.g., rhythm, color, texture, form or detailing), landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. (2) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The proposed improvements have little impact on the relationship of structures and site to adjoining area. The Board finds this criterion to be met. 14.07 Specific Review Standards A. Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. No reservation of land is required. B. Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire-served utility lines and service connections shall be underground insofar as feasible and subject to state public utilities DRAFT #SP-16-01 SP_16_01_SwiftStreetExtension_VillageAtDorsetPark_stormwater_ffd.doc - 3 – regulations. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Not applicable. C. Disposal of Wastes. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). Small receptacles intended for use by households or the public (ie, non-dumpster, non-large drum) shall not be required to be fenced or screened. Not applicable D. Landscaping and Screening Requirements. See Article 13, Section 13.06 Landscaping, Screening, and Street Trees. In an email to staff dated January 29, 2016 the City Arborist provided the following comments: I’ve reviewed the most recent tree protection specifications (modified 1/29/16) and find them acceptable. Craig Lambert South Burlington City Arborist The Board finds that the applicant shall amend the plans to specify a tree protection plan for the 15-inch diameter Shagbark Hickory. E. Modification of Standards. Where the limitations of a site may cause unusual hardship in complying with any of the standards above and waiver therefrom will not endanger the public health, safety or welfare, the Development Review Board may modify such standards as long as the general objectives of Article 14 and the City's Comprehensive Plan are met. However, with the exception of side yard setbacks in the Central District 1, in no case shall the DRB permit the location of a new structure less than five (5) feet from any property boundary and in no case shall be the DRB allow land development creating a total site coverage exceeding the allowable limit for the applicable zoning district in the case of new development, or increasing the coverage on sites where the pre-existing condition exceeds the applicable limit. No waivers requested. STORMWATER In an email to staff dated January 29, 2016 the Department of Public Works provided the following comments: DRAFT #SP-16-01 SP_16_01_SwiftStreetExtension_VillageAtDorsetPark_stormwater_ffd.doc - 4 – The Stormwater Section has reviewed the “Village at Dorset Park – Pond Improvements” site plan prepared by Ruggiano Engineering, dated 1/21/14 and most recently updated on 1/29/16. We would like to offer the following comment: Staff from the Stormwater Section have been working directly with the Village at Dorset Park Homeowners Association and their engineer on the development of this stormwater pond improvement project. We support this project and have no further comments. Thanks, Dave Wheeler Assistant Stormwater Superintendent DECISION Motion by _____________, seconded by ________________, to approve site plan application #SP-16-01 of The Village at Dorset Park Homeowners Association subject to the following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. This project shall be completed as shown on the plans submitted by the applicant and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. 3. The plans shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Administrative Officer. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the Administrative Officer prior to permit issuance. a. The site plan shall be revised to show existing trees in proximity to the proposed improvements. b. The site plan shall be revised to specify tree protection measures for the 15 inch Shagbark Hickory. 4. The applicant shall continue to work with Department of Public Works and comply with their recommendations. 5. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 17.04 of the Land Development Regulations or this approval is null and void. 6. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the stormwater treatment facilities. 7. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall provide the Administrative Officer a digital copy of the complete approved plan set (with revisions) in pdf format. 8. The applicant shall regularly maintain the stormwater treatment and conveyance structures. DRAFT #SP-16-01 SP_16_01_SwiftStreetExtension_VillageAtDorsetPark_stormwater_ffd.doc - 5 – Tim Barritt– yea nay abstain not present Mark Behr – yea nay abstain not present Brian Breslend – yea nay abstain not present Bill Miller – yea nay abstain not present David Parsons – yea nay abstain not present Jennifer Smith – yea nay abstain not present John Wilking – yea nay abstain not present Motion carried by a vote of X– 0 – 0 Signed this ____ day of __________________ 2016, by _____________________________________ Tim Barritt, Chair Please note: An appeal of this decision may be taken by filing, within 30 days of the date of this decision, a notice of appeal and the required fee by certified mail to the Superior Court, Environmental Division. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b). A copy of the notice of appeal must also be mailed to the City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department at 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b) (4)(A). Please contact the Environmental Division at 802-828-1660 or http://vermontjudiciary.org/GTC/environmental/default.aspx for more information on filing requirements, deadlines, fees and mailing address. The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call 802.879.5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. DRAFT PROJECT NO...........2011020CHECKED BY...........CRC,LEWSCALE............................1" = 60'DATE...........................01/21/14DRAWN BY.............DJL,JGESHEET NO.C-1 OVERALL SITE PLANC-2 POND 1 SITE PLANC-3 POND 2 SITE PLANC-4 POND 3 SITE PLANC-5 DETAILSC-6 CDS DETAILSC-7 LANDSCAPE DETAILSSITE LOCATION MAPNOT TO SCALENORTHLIST OF DRAWINGSOVERALL SITE PLANSCALE: 1" = 60'1C-1PLAN REFERENCES:1) TOPOGRAPHY FROM ELECTRONIC FILE ENTITLED "SOUB0165-VILLAGE AT DORSETPARK-BOYD-L&H-WS-070110.DWG" DATED 07-01-10 FROM BUTTON PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS, SOUTHBURLINGTON, VT.2) AERIAL PHOTO FROM VCGI DATABASE "VTORTHO_0_5M_PAN"HTTP://WWW.VCGI.VERMONT.GOV/WAREHOUSE/IMAGERY3) "OVERALL SITE PLAN FOR THE VILLAGE AT DORSET PARK" PREPARED BY FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN, INC.,DATE: FEB 1992, SHEET 1 OF 13, SCALE: 1"=100'4) PROPERTY BOUNDARIES FROM CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY MAP5) THE VILLAGE AT DORSET PARK, PLAT OF SUBDIVISION, SCALE: 1"=50', RECORDED BY SOUTH BURLINGTONCITY CLERK ON OCTOBER 8, 1992, VOLUME 286, PAGE 54OVERALL SITE PLANVILLAGE AT DORSET PARK - POND IMPROVEMENTSSWIFT STREET EXTENSIONSOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONTC-11 OF 7 SHEETSEXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOUR500500PROPOSED OUTLET DRAIN PIPESDDPEXISTING STORMWATER DRAINLEGENDEXISTING POND OUTLET STRUCTUREPROPOSED POND OUTLET STRUCTUREDDPROPOSED TYPE II STONE LININGfeetGraphic Scale60 0 60 240120SITELOCATIONPROPERTY LINEEXISTING CATCH BASINNOTES:1) THIS DRAWING IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY PLAT. BOUNDARY LINE INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED ONPLAN REFERENCE #3, #4 & #5. THE PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS AND OTHER REAL PROPERTYDESCRIPTIONS PROVIDED ON THIS DRAWING ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. THEY DO NOTDEFINE LEGAL RIGHTS OR MEET LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR A LAND SURVEY AS DESCRIBED IN V.S.A.TITLE27 SECTION 1403 AND SHALL NOT BE USED IN LIEU OF A SURVEY AS THE BASIS OF ANY LAND TRANSFER ORESTABLISHMENT OF ANY PROPERTY RIGHT.2) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFYING AND DETERMINING THE LOCATION, SIZE,AND ELEVATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEERSHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR UTILITIES FOUND INTERFERING WITH THEPROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION SHALL BE TAKEN BEFORE PROCEEDINGWITH THE WORK.3) THIS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF "DIG SAFE" MARKINGS. UTILITYLOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE NOT WARRANTED TO BE EXACT OR COMPLETE. THECONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "DIG SAFE" BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK AND SHALL PRESERVE ALLEXISTING UTILITIES NOT SPECIFIED TO BE REMOVED OR ABANDONED AS PART OF THE PROJECT.RIGHT OF WAY / EASEMENTNOTE:ALL EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPES DISCHARGINGTO PONDS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ACCUMULATEDSEDIMENT, INSPECTED AND REPAIRED AS REQUIRED.THE BASE BID SHALL INCLUDE CLEANING. DAMAGECAUSED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REPAIRED ATTHE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. EXISTING DEFICIENCIESWILL BE ADDRESSED BY CHANGE ORDER(S).REVISION: 01/29/16 - REVISED PER DEC/CITY OF S. BURLINGTON COMMENTSREVISION: 12/30/15 - REVISED PER CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON COMMENTS.REVISION: 12/18/15 - REMOVED PROPOSED POND FOREBAYS, REPLACED WITH CONTECH CDS UNITS, ASSOCIATED REVISIONS.REVISION: 09/07/15 - REVISED PER STATE OF VERMONT COMMENTS.REVISION: 03/24/15 - REVISED PER DAM SAFETY COMMENTS.REVISION: 01/29/15 - REVISED POND SIDE SLOPES AND RIP-RAP LIMITS.REVISION: 11/05/14 - REVISED PLAN PER THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON COMMENTS.REVISION: 10/09/14 - REVISED PLAN PER THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON COMMENTS.PROPOSED WATER LEVELPROPOSED UNDERGROUNDPOWER / TELECOMMUNICATIONSUGPROPOSED GAS LINEGPROPOSED WATER LINEWEXISTING VOLUME: 135,231 CU. FT.PROPOSED VOLUME: 92,413 CU. FT.EXISTING WATER LEVEL: 322.0PROPOSED WATER LEVEL: 319.0PROPOSEDPOND 1 SLOPERECONSTRUCTIONPOND 1EXISTING VOLUME: 560,543 CU. FT.PROPOSED VOLUME: 494,091 CU. FT.EXISTING WATER LEVEL: 327.0PROPOSED WATER LEVEL: 324.0PROPOSEDPOND 2 FOREBAYPROPOSEDPOND 3 FOREBAY 1EXISTING VOLUME: 575,777 CU. FT.PROPOSED VOLUME: 499,192 CU. FT.EXISTING WATER LEVEL: 316.00PROPOSED WATER LEVEL: 314.50BRAND FARM DRIVEBRAND FARM DRIVESWIFT STREET EXTENSIONIRIS LANEBLUESTAR LANEIRIS LANELUPINE LANEPROPOSED DISCHARGE PIPEPROPOSED DISCHARGE PIPE(2) EXISTING 36" DIA.STORM DRAINS322322322324326328332328330334336336336334330328326332330332338326324320318316 322324326328330340340340340338330332330336334EXISTING 24" DIA.STORM DRAININV. = 316.00EXTEND ASNECESSARYEXISTING 24" DIA.STORM DRAINTO BE REMOVEDEXISTING 24" DIA.STORM DRAINEXISTING 24" DIA.STORM DRAINTO BE REMOVEDEXISTING 18" DIA.STORM DRAINEXISTING 15" DIA.STORM DRAININV. = 326.5EXTEND ASNECESSARYEXISTING 24"DIA. STORMDRAIN INV. = 326.13TO BEEXTENDED ASNECESSARYEXISTING 24" DIA.STORM DRAININV = 316.23'EXTEND ASNECESSARYPOND 2POND 3EXISTING TENNIS COURTEXISTING TENNIS COURTPROPOSED POND 1OUTLET STRUCTUREPROPOSED POND 2OUTLET STRUCTUREEXISTING POND 3OUTLET STRUCTUREPROPOSED EMERGENCYOVERFLOW SWALEPROPOSED EMERGENCYOVERFLOW SWALEPROPOSED EMERGENCYOVERFLOW SWALE314312 310VILLAGE AT DORSET PARKCLUSTER BVILLAGE AT DORSET PARKCLUSTER EVILLAGE AT DORSET PARKCLUSTER CVILLAGE AT DORSET PARKCLUSTER AVILLAGE AT DORSET PARKCLUSTER DPROPOSED SAFETY FENCE,SPLIT RAIL WITH METALWOVEN WIRE BACKING -EXISTING FENCING TO BEREMOVED, TYP. - SEEPROPOSEDSAFETYFENCEPROPOSED CONSTRUCTION,MAINTENANCE & ACCESSEASEMENTPROPOSED CONSTRUCTION,MAINTENANCE & ACCESSEASEMENTPROPOSEDCONSTRUCTION,MAINTENANCE &ACCESS EASEMENTPROPOSEDCONSTRUCTION,MAINTENANCE &ACCESS EASEMENTPROPOSEDCONSTRUCTION,MAINTENANCE &ACCESSEASEMENT, 10'FROM TOP OFPOND SIDESLOPE, TYP.PROPOSED 30' EASEMENTFOR CONSTRUCTION OFOVERFLOW SWALE,STORMWATER PIPINGMAINTENANCE ANDPOND OUTLET ACCESSPROPOSED 20' EASEMENTTO BE USED FOR PIPEAND POND ACCESSPROPOSED 20'EASEMENTPROPOSED 20'EASEMENTPROPOSED 20'EASEMENTPROPOSED 20' WIDEEASEMENT IN FAVOROF CITY OF SOUTHBURLINGTONEXISTING 15' WIDESEWER EASEMENTPROPOSED ACCESSEASEMENT TO CITYOF SO. BURLINGTONPROPOSED PONDDRAIN VALVE, TYP.EXISTINGPOOLTODORSET STREETTBM TOP OF NORTHEASTCORNER OF EXISTING POND3 OUTLET STRUCTUREELEV. = 319.85' (NAD83)2C-2PROPOSEDCDS #1(CDS2020-5-C)SEEPROPOSED CDS #3(CDS2020-5-C) SEEPROPOSED CDS #4(CDS2020-5-C) SEEEXISTING CATCHBASIN TO BEREPLACED WITHPROPOSED CDS #2(CDS2025-5-C) SEE5C-65C-65C-65C-6322EXISTING CBRIM = 332.00OUTLET INV= 326.83C5 LAKE STREETST. ALBANS, VERMONT 05478PHONE - (802) 524-9300 FAX - (802) 524-9700COPYRIGHT 2016 - RUGGIANO ENGINEERING, INC. PROJECT NO...........2011020CHECKED BY...........CRC,LEWSCALE............................1" = 20'DATE............................01/21/14DRAWN BY...DJL,NRL,JGESHEET NO.POND 1 SITE PLANSCALE: 1" = 20'1C-2Graphic Scale20 0 20 8040POND 1 SITE PLANVILLAGE AT DORSET PARK - POND IMPROVEMENTSSWIFT STREET EXTENSIONSOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONTC-2feet2 OF 7 SHEETSPROPOSEDVEHICULARACCESS AREAFOR PONDCONSTRUCTIONAND FUTUREMAINTENANCENOTE:ALL EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPES SHALL BE INSPECTEDAT THE POINT OF DISCHARGE INTO THE PONDS, CLEANEDOF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND REPAIRED AS REQUIRED.REVISION: 01/29/16 - REVISED PER DEC/CITY OF S. BURLINGTON COMMENTSREVISION: 12/30/15 - REVISED PER CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON COMMENTS.REVISION: 12/18/15 - REMOVED PROPOSED POND FOREBAYS, REPLACED WITH CONTECH CDS UNITS, ASSOCIATED REVISIONS.REVISION: 09/07/15 - REVISED PER STATE OF VERMONT COMMENTS.REVISION: 08/11/15 - ADDED EXISTING TREE INVENTORY LOCATIONS AND TABLE.REVISION: 03/24/15 - REVISED PER DAM SAFETY COMMENTS.REVISION: 01/29/15 - REVISED POND SIDE SLOPES AND RIP-RAP LIMITS.REVISION: 11/05/14 - REVISED PLAN PER THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON COMMENTS.REVISION: 10/09/14 - REVISED PLAN PER THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON COMMENTS.EXISTING TREE INVENTORY - POND 1TREE ID TYPESIZE(DIA.)QTY.LOCATION NOTES TO BE REMOVED1WHITE PINE 15"1INSIDE 10' BUFFER AS NEEDED2WHITE PINE21" 1INSIDE 10' BUFFER AS NEEDED3 ASPEN 5" - 10"4INSIDE OR ON EXISTING FENCE LINE YES4SHAGBARK HICKORY 18"1OUTSIDE (BUT CLOSE TO)BUFFER ZONENO5 CEDAR2" 1INSIDE 10' BUFFER AS NEEDED6MISC. JUNK GROWTH -SUMAC, HARDHACKN/A N/AINSIDE 10' BUFFER AS NEEDED7JACK PINE9"1INSIDE 10' BUFFER - EXCEPTION,SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BE REMOVED9' BACK FROM WATER NO8JACK PINE9"1INSIDE 10' BUFFER - EXCEPTION,SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BE REMOVED8' BACK FROM WATER NO9 UNIDENTIFIEDCLUMP OF LARGE BUSHON OLD STUMPNO10 WILLOW 21"1OUTSIDE (BUT CLOSE TO)BUFFER ZONE14' BACK FROM WATER NONOTES:1) ALL WOOD FOR SPLIT RAIL FENCE TO BE PRESSURE TREATED.2) END POST SHALL BE TERMINAL POST.3) STAPLE METAL WOVEN WIRE TO TOP & BOTTOM RAILS &VERTICAL POSTS @ 2' O.C.10' x 3.5" x 1.5" RAILS WITH TAPERED TIPSTO MEET SLOTS4.5" SLOTS6"10"36"10'-0"EXISTING SOILEXISTING GRADESPLIT RAIL FENCE WITHMETAL WOVEN WIRE BACKINGNOT TO SCALE2C-2METAL WOVENWIRE3.5"POST (TYPICAL)C5 LAKE STREETST. ALBANS, VERMONT 05478PHONE - (802) 524-9300 FAX - (802) 524-9700COPYRIGHT 2016 - RUGGIANO ENGINEERING, INC.NOTE:CONTRACTOR TO BE RESPONSIBLEFOR APPROPRIATE PROTECTION OFALL EXISTING TREES NOT BEINGREMOVED. TO INCLUDE FENCING,STABILIZING AND EXCAVATIONBUFFERS AS REQUIRED TO ENSUREPROTECTION FROM EQUIPMENTAND FILL MATERIAL AS WELL ASROOT STRUCTURES. PROJECT NO...........2011020CHECKED BY............CRC,LEWSCALE............................1" = 20'DATE............................01/21/14DRAWN BY...DJL,NRL,JGESHEET NO.POND 2 SITE PLANSCALE: 1" = 20'1C-3Graphic Scale20 0 20 8040POND 2 SITE PLANVILLAGE AT DORSET PARK - POND IMPROVEMENTSSWIFT STREET EXTENSIONSOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONTC-3feet3 OF 7 SHEETSNOTE:ALL EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPES DISCHARGINGTO PONDS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ACCUMULATEDSEDIMENT, INSPECTED AND REPAIRED AS REQUIRED.REVISION: 01/29/16 - REVISED PER DEC / CITY OF S. BURLINGTON COMMENTSREVISION: 12/30/15 - REVISED PER CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON COMMENTS.REVISION: 12/18/15 - REMOVED PROPOSED POND FOREBAYS, REPLACED WITH CONTECH CDS UNITS, ASSOCIATED REVISION.REVISION: 09/07/15 - REVISED PER STATE OF VERMONT COMMENTS.REVISION: 08/11/15 - ADDED EXISTING TREE INVENTORY LOCATIONS AND TABLE.REVISION: 03/24/15 - REVISED PER DAM SAFETY COMMENTS.REVISION: 01/29/15 - REVISED POND SIDE SLOPES AND RIP-RAP LIMITS.REVISION: 11/05/14 - REVISED PLAN PER THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON COMMENTS.REVISION: 10/09/14 - REVISED PLAN PER THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON COMMENTS.EXISTING TREE INVENTORY - POND 2TREE ID TYPESIZE(DIA.)QTY.LOCATION NOTESTO BEREMOVED1 ASPEN 5" 1 INSIDE EXISTING FENCE LINE YES2 CEDAR 2.5" 1 INSIDE OR ON EXISTING FENCE LINE YES3 ASPEN 4" 4 INSIDE OR ON EXISTING FENCE LINE CLUMP YES4 WHITE BIRCH <2" 1 INSIDE OR ON EXISTING FENCE LINE YES5 ASPEN 2.5" 1 INSIDE OR ON EXISTING FENCE LINE YES6 GRAY BIRCH 3" & 4" 2 INSIDE OR ON EXISTING FENCE LINE YES7 ASPEN 4" 1 INSIDE OR ON EXISTING FENCE LINE YES8 ASPEN 3" 1 INSIDE OR ON EXISTING FENCE LINE YES9 ASPEN 4" 1 INSIDE OR ON EXISTING FENCE LINE YES10 CRAB APPLE 8" 1INSIDE 10' BUFFER - EXCEPTION,SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BE REMOVEDNO11 CHOKE CHERRY 5" 1INSIDE 10' BUFFER - EXCEPTION,SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BE REMOVEDNO12 CRAB APPLE 9" 1INSIDE 10' BUFFER - EXCEPTION,SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BE REMOVEDNO13 WILLOW 2" - 3" CLUMP INSIDE 10' BUFFER AS NEEDED14 ASPEN10"1 INSIDE 10' BUFFER AS NEEDED15 CRAB APPLE 7" 1 INSIDE 10' BUFFER AS NEEDED16 CRAB APPLE 6" 1OUTSIDE (BUT CLOSE TO) BUFFERZONENOC5 LAKE STREETST. ALBANS, VERMONT 05478PHONE - (802) 524-9300 FAX - (802) 524-9700COPYRIGHT 2016 - RUGGIANO ENGINEERING, INC.NOTE:CONTRACTOR TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATEPROTECTION OF ALL EXISTING TREES NOT BEINGREMOVED. TO INCLUDE FENCING, STABILIZING ANDEXCAVATION BUFFERS AS REQUIRED TO ENSUREPROTECTION FROM EQUIPMENT AND FILL MATERIALAS WELL AS ROOT STRUCTURES. PROJECT NO...........2011020CHECKED BY..............CRC,LEWSCALE............................1" = 20'DATE...........................01/21/14DRAWN BY...DJL,NRL,JGESHEET NO.POND 3 SITE PLANSCALE: 1" = 20'1C-4Graphic Scale20 0 20 8040POND 3 SITE PLANVILLAGE AT DORSET PARK - POND IMPROVEMENTSSWIFT STREET EXTENSIONSOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONTC-4feet4 OF 7 SHEETSNOTE:ALL EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPES DISCHARGINGTO PONDS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ACCUMULATEDSEDIMENT, INSPECTED AND REPAIRED AS REQUIRED.ALL TREES AND WOODY VEGETATION WITHIN A 15FOOT RADIUS OF ALL OUTLET STRUCTURES SHALLBE REMOVED.REVISION: 01/29/16 - REVISED PER DEC / CITY OF S. BURLINGTON COMMENTSREVISION: 12/30/15 - REVISED PER CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON COMMENTS.REVISION: 12/18/15 - REMOVED PROPOSED POND FOREBAYS, REPLACED WITH CONTECH CDS UNITS, ASSOCIATED REVISIONS.REVISION: 09/07/15 - REVISED PER STATE OF VERMONT COMMENTS.REVISION: 08/11/15 - ADDED EXISTING TREE INVENTORY LOCATIONS AND TABLE.REVISION: 03/24/15 - REVISED PER DAM SAFETY COMMENTS.REVISION: 01/29/15 - REVISED POND SIDE SLOPES AND RIP-RAP LIMITS.REVISION: 11/05/14 - REVISED PLAN PER THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON COMMENTS.REVISION: 10/09/14 - REVISED PLAN PER THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON COMMENTS.EXISTING TREE INVENTORY - POND 3TREE ID TYPESIZE(DIA.)QTY.LOCATION NOTESTO BEREMOVED1 GRAY BIRCH 2" - 5" 8 INSIDE OR ON EXISTING FENCE LINE YES2 GRAY BIRCH 2" - 5" 15 INSIDE OR ON EXISTING FENCE LINE YES3 WHITE BIRCH 5" - 7" 2 INSIDE 10' BUFFER AS NEEDED4 WHITE BIRCH 4" - 5" 2 INSIDE OR ON EXISTING FENCE LINE YES5 WILLOW 21" 1 INSIDE 10' BUFFER 7' BACK FROM WATER YES6 GRAY BIRCH 3" - 4" 6 INSIDE OR ON EXISTING FENCE LINE YES7 ASPEN 23" 1 INSIDE OR ON EXISTING FENCE LINEON TOP OF OUTLETSTRUCTUREYES8 WILLOW 26" 1 INSIDE OR ON EXISTING FENCE LINEON TOP OF OUTLETSTRUCTUREYES9 SPRUCE 7" 1OUTSIDE (BUT CLOSE TO)BUFFER ZONE19' BACK FROM OUTLETSTRUCTURENO10 ASPEN 14" 1 INSIDE OR ON EXISTING FENCE LINE YES11 ASPEN 6" 1 INSIDE 10' BUFFER AS NEEDED12 ASPEN 2" - 4" 9 INSIDE OR ON EXISTING FENCE LINE YES13 ASPEN 4" - 11" 6 INSIDE 10' BUFFER AS NEEDED14 ASPEN 6" 1 INSIDE 10' BUFFER AS NEEDED15 YELLOW BIRCH 7" 2OUTSIDE (BUT CLOSE TO)BUFFER ZONE10' FROM WATER NO16 CRAB APPLE 6" 1OUTSIDE (BUT CLOSE TO)BUFFER ZONENO17 CRAB APPLE 7" 1OUTSIDE (BUT CLOSE TO)BUFFER ZONENO18 WILLOW 24" 1INSIDE 10' BUFFER - EXCEPTION,SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BE REMOVEDNO19 WILLOW 25" 1INSIDE 10' BUFFER - EXCEPTION,SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BE REMOVEDNO20 ASPEN 12" 6 INSIDE OR ON EXISTING FENCE LINE YES21 CRAB APPLE 7" 1OUTSIDE (BUT CLOSE TO)BUFFER ZONENO22 SILVER MAPLE 6" 1OUTSIDE (BUT CLOSE TO)BUFFER ZONENO23 CRAB APPLE 7" 1OUTSIDE (BUT CLOSE TO)BUFFER ZONENO24 CRAB APPLE 7" 1OUTSIDE (BUT CLOSE TO)BUFFER ZONENO25 CRAB APPLE 6" 1OUTSIDE (BUT CLOSE TO)BUFFER ZONENOBRAND FARM DRIVEC5 LAKE STREETST. ALBANS, VERMONT 05478PHONE - (802) 524-9300 FAX - (802) 524-9700COPYRIGHT 2016 - RUGGIANO ENGINEERING, INC.NOTE:CONTRACTOR TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR APPROPRIATEPROTECTION OF ALL EXISTING TREES NOT BEINGREMOVED. TO INCLUDE FENCING, STABILIZING ANDEXCAVATION BUFFERS AS REQUIRED TO ENSUREPROTECTION FROM EQUIPMENT AND FILL MATERIALAS WELL AS ROOT STRUCTURES. ABCDEDIA.WALLWALLCBATONGUE OR GROOVEDIA. +1"WALLEWALLDEWALLDIA.PROJECT NO...........2011020CHECKED BY.............CRC,LEWSCALE....................AS NOTEDDATE............................01/21/14DRAWN BY.............DJL,JGESHEET NO.DETAILSVILLAGE AT DORSET PARK - POND IMPROVEMENTSSWIFT STREET EXTENSIONSOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONTC-55 OF 7 SHEETSTYPICAL OUTLET PIPE TRENCHNOT TO SCALE1C-5NOTES:1) THE POND SHOULD BE REGULARLY INSPECTED FOR BUILD-UP OF SEDIMENT. SEDIMENT SHOULD BE REMOVED WHEN GREATER THAN A 6" DEPTH HAS ACCUMULATED.2) VEGETATION SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN ALL AREAS THAT DO NOT RECEIVE RIP RAP, PAVEMENT OR CONCRETE.3) PROPER SEDIMENT CONTROL SHALL BE PLACED AND MAINTAINED DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF SEDIMENT REACHING THE PONDS.4) ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS SHOULD BE INSPECTED ON A REGULAR BASIS AND AFTER ANY SIGNIFICANT STORM EVENT AND REPAIRED AS NECESSARY. INSTALLADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL, SUCH AS STONE CHECK DAMS, RIP RAP, ETC. AS REQUIRED.5) ALL STONE ABOVE NORMAL WATER LINE TO BE RED SANDSTONE COLORED TYPE II. SUBMIT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY ASSOCIATIONESTABLISH GRASS WITH 4"TOPSOIL, FERTILIZER, SEEDAND MULCH PER SPECSSEDIMENTFOREBAYBOTTOM OF FOREBAY = CNOTE:OWNER MAY LINE SEDIMENT FOREBAY WITHBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT OR CONCRETE FOREASE OF SEDIMENT REMOVALTYPE II STONE FILL24" THICK (MIN.)24" THICKTYPE II STONEBA2141WATER QUALITY VOLUMEFOREBAY SECTIONNOT TO SCALE2C-5VARIES20' MIN.24"24" MIN.VARIES10' MIN.METAL OR HDPEEND SECTIONFLOWPLANFLOWMIRAFI FW300FILTER FABRICUNDER STONEOUTFALL PROTECTION -24" OF TYPE II STONE FILLAS PER VAOT SPEC 706.04END SECTIONPROFILECULVERT OUTLET DETAILNOT TO SCALE5C-5TYPICAL FLARED END SECTION DETAILNOT TO SCALE4C-5GRADE TO EXISTINGBOTTOM OF PONDVTRANS 2011 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS SECTION 706.04DEFINES TYPE II STONE:"THE LONGEST DIMENSION OF THE STONE SHALL VARY FROM50 TO 900 MM (2 TO 36 INCHES), AND AT LEAST 50 PERCENT OFTHE VOLUME OF THE STONE IN PLACE SHALL HAVE A LEASTDIMENSION OF 300 MM (12 INCHES)."VISIBLY SMALLER OR LARGER STONE WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.3C-5TYPE II STONE SPECIFICATIONSEXISTING OPENING13" HIGH X 15' WIDEEXISTING OPENING12" HIGH X 4' WIDEADD 5" ORIFICE WITHTRASH RACKINV. = 314.5017'1'-9"EXISTING 24" DIA.DOME GRATEEXISTING 24" DIA. DOME GRATEPOND 3 OUTLETSTRUCTURE MODIFICATIONSNOT TO SCALE6C-5POND OUTLET STRUCTURENOT TO SCALE7C-51'-5"3'-0"2'-0"90°WELD EACH SIDE, (TYP.)2" X 1/4" STEELSTOCK ALL AROUND1/2" DIAMETER HOLES@ 24" O.C. MAX. (TYP.)3LBS/PER FOOT SQUAREDEXPANDED STEEL GRATE ONTOP, BOTTOM AND SIDESWELD 1"X 1"X 1/8" ANGLEOVER ALL EDGES (TYP.)NOTES:1) TRASH RACK TO BE CENTERED OVEROPENING.2) STEEL TO CONFORM TO ASTM A-36.3) ALL SURFACES TO BE COATED WITHCOLD GALVANIZING COMPOUNDAFTER WELDING.4) TRASH RACK TO BE FASTENED TO THEWALL WITH 1/2" MASONRY ANCHORS.TRASH RACK TO BE REMOVABLE.TRASH RACKNOT TO SCALE8C-5OUTLET PIPEPER PLAN4' SUMP5' MIN.12"24"24" DIAMETEROUTLET PIPEFLEXIBLE BOOT,WATER TIGHT5' MIN.24" DIA. DOME GRATECAMP PRECAST ORAPPROVED EQUIVALENTCATCH BASIN STRUCTURETRASH RACKSEEELEVATIONPLAN VIEW12" COMPACTEDCRUSHED STONE*POND 1 = 324.00 (6" ORIFICE)*POND 2 = 319.00 (6" ORIFICE)STRUCTURE OUTLET*POND 1 = 321.50*POND 2 = 315.50'O' RING ORBUTYL ROPE8C-5POND 1 = 325.50POND 2 = 321.001'-6"RADIUS REQUIREDTO MATCH OUTLETSTRUCTURE1.5D MIN.24" MIN.FILTER DIAPHRAGMNOT TO SCALE9C-5POND OUTLET PIPEPONDOUTLETPIPE3D MIN.NOTES:1) FILTER MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED UNIFORMLY IN LAYERS NOT TO EXCEED 8 INCHES THICK BEFORE COMPACTION. EACH LAYER SHALLBE THOROUGHLY WETTED PRIOR TO COMPACTION. EACH LAYER OF FILTER MATERIAL SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 95% OFSTANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY.2) ANY DAMAGE TO THE FOUNDATION SURFACE OR THE TRENCH SIDES OR BOTTOM OCCURRING DURING PLACEMENT OF FILTER MATERIALSHALL BE REPAIRED BEFORE FILTER MATERIAL PLACEMENT IS CONTINUED.3) FILTER MATERIAL SHALL BE WELL GRADED CLEAN SAND MEETING ASTM C-33 FOR FINE AGGREGATE.4) COMPACTION TESTING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM STANDARD TEST METHODS D4253 AND D4254.FILTERMATERIALFINISHEDGRADEFILTERMATERIAL24" MIN.MIRAFI FW300 OREQUIVALENT GEOTEXTILEMIRAFI FW300 OREQUIVALENT GEOTEXTILEVARIESDETENTION POND DRAIN10C-5NOT TO SCALEGATE VALVE BOXFINISHED GROUND6" DIA. SCH40SOLID PVC, SEEPLAN6" DIA. FLANGED HIGHIMPACT PVC - BODY PPPLUG, EPDM O-RING6" DIA. GATEVALVE, SEEDETAIL #10 -THIS SHEETDETENTION POND ELEVATION SUMMARYPONDBOTTOMSLOWRELEASEOUTLETPERM.POOLQP10ELEVATIONQP 100ELEVATIONOVERFLOWGRATEEMERGENCYSPILLWAYTOP OFBERMPOND DRAININLETPOND DRAINOUTLETPOND 1 317.50 324.00 324.00 325.39 326.10 325.50 327.25 327.75 321.75 321.75POND 2 313.50 319.00 319.00 321.09 321.60 321.00 321.50 322.00 315.75 315.75POND 3 307.50 314.50 314.50 316.54 318.12 319.80 320.75 321.25 313.50 313.50FOREBAY ELEVATION SUMMARYBERMASPILLWAYBBOTTOMCPOND 2 322.50 321.00 317.00POND 3 316.50 315.00 311.002'-3"REVISION: 01/29/16 - REVISED PER DEC / CITY OF S. BURLINGTON COMMENTSREVISION: 12/30/15 - REVISED PER CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON COMMENTS.REVISION: 09/07/15 - REVISED PER STATE OF VERMONT COMMENTS.REVISION: 04/21/15 - REVISED DETAILS 1 AND 10 PER DAM SAFETY COMMENTS.REVISION: 03/24/15 - REVISED PER DAM SAFETY COMMENTS.REVISION: 01/29/15 - REVISED POND SIDE SLOPES, RIP-RAP LIMITS AND POND DRAIN ELEVATIONS.REVISION: 11/05/14 - REVISED PLAN PER THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON COMMENTS.REVISION: 10/09/14 - REVISED PLAN PER THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON COMMENTS.12" MIN.6"DETENTION PONDWELL DRAINED 1 1/2"MINUS CRUSHEDGRAVEL WITH 85% MAX.PASSING A 3/4" SIEVE6" DIA. SCHEDULE40 PVC PIPE,PERFORATEDPROPOSED 6"POND DRAININV. = 313.506" DIA. PVC POND DRAINLAID FLAT - EXTEND TOOUTLET STRUCTUREPER PLAN1424" DIA. DOME GRATENOTE:ALL TREES AND WOODY VEGETATIONWITHIN 15 FEET OF THE OUTLETSTRUCTURE SHALL BE CLEARED.FOREBAY BERMWITH OVERFLOWSPILLWAY - SEE12C-56" PVCDETENTION PONDDRAIN - 6" PVCPOND 1 INV. = 321.75POND 2 INV. = 315.756" DIA. GATE VALVE,SEE DETAIL #10 - THIS SHEETDVARIES,SEE PLAN FORINVERTELEVATIONSNOTES:1) ALL DISTURBED CROSS-COUNTRY AREAS SHALL BE RESTORED WITH 4" TOPSOIL, SEED, FERTILIZER AND MULCHIN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN EROSIONCONTROL, WATER, ETC. UNTIL A VIABLE STAND OF GRASS HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED TO THE SATISFACTION OFTHE ENGINEER.2) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SHORING OR TAPER SIDES OF ALL TRENCHES DEEPER THAN 4 FT. DURINGCONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH V.O.S.H.A. STANDARDS.3) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AND COORDINATE ALL NECESSARY TRAFFIC CONTROLS IN ACCORDANCEWITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.MOUND TOPSOIL AS REQUIREDTO COMPENSATE FOR SETTLINGRCP OUTLET PIPE AS PER PLAN/SPECSUNDISTURBED NATIVE SOILOR COMPACTEDEMBANKMENT BACKFILLBOTTOM OF PONDPOND UNDERDRAINFLEXIBLE BOOT,WATER TIGHT2 MIN.1FILTER DIAPHRAGMDRAIN PIPE - SEE9C-5SIDE SLOPES SHALL BE GRADUAL ENOUGHTO PREVENT DIFFERENTIAL SETTLING OFEXISTING SOILSUITABLE BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BEWELL-GRADED, WITH 1 1/2" MAX. PARTICLESIZE, A MIN. OF 50% AND MAX. 85% PASSINGA #200 SIEVE AND A PLASTICITY OF 10% AND30%, PLACE WITH WATER CONTENT BETWEEN1% AND 3% WET OF OPTIMUM. COMPACT IN8" MAX. LIFTS TO 95% OF MAXIMUM STANDARDPROCTOR DRY DENSITY.CORE & INSTALL WATERTIGHT BOOT CONNECTOR36"MIN.D4" SOLID PVCDAYLIGHT TO POND@ 0% SLOPE3D MIN.TRENCH+5 FT.,3D MIN.CLEAN-OUT WITHREMOVABLE SOLID COVER6" CORRUGATED METALSLEEVE, GALVANIZEDSLOTTED 4" PVC COLLECTORSLOT WIDTH 0.5 MM MAX.4" SOLIDPVC RISERTRENCH+5 FT.,3D MIN.6" ASTM C-33 FINESAND AGGREGATE36" MIN.1C-5NATIVE SOIL OR COMPACTEDEMBANKMENT BACKFILLMATERIAL PERC5 LAKE STREETST. ALBANS, VERMONT 05478PHONE - (802) 524-9300 FAX - (802) 524-9700COPYRIGHT 2016 - RUGGIANO ENGINEERING, INC.NOTE:1) FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL BE INSTALLEDAT ALL LOCATIONS WHERE STORM PIPING ISDAYLIGHTED2) END SECTIONS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PERMANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS, SUBJECTTO THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER.3) TYPICAL CONCRETE END SECTION SHOWN,APPROPRIATE TYPE OF END SECTION SHOULDBE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR BASED ONTHE TYPE OF PIPE - SUBJECT TO SUBMITTALAND APPROVAL BY ENGINEER36"MIN.18" MIN. FOREBAYS,24" MIN. PONDOVERFLOWS18" MIN.MIRAFI 500X FILTERFABRIC (OR EQUIVALENT)2 MIN.1141STONE LINED SPILLWAYNOT TO SCALE11C-5PROVIDE 4" MIN. TOPSOIL, SEED,FERTILIZER AND MULCH PERSPECIFICATIONSEXISTINGGRADE24" STONE FILL TYPE II VAOT-706.04NOTE: ALL STONE ABOVE NORMALWATER LINE TO BE REDSANDSTONE COLORED TYPE II.SUBMIT FOR REVIEW ANDAPPROVAL BY ASSOCIATION2 MIN. PLAN VIEW B-BCENTER OF CDSSTRUCTURE, SCREENAND SUMP OPENINGPVC HYDRAULIC SHEARPLATEMODEL CDS2020 - 2'-7" [787]MODEL CDS2025 - 2'-11" [889](2'-0" [610])1'-9" [533]MODEL CDS2020 - 5'-3" [1600]MODEL CDS2025 - 5'-7" [1702]ELEVATION A-AFIBERGLASS SEPARATIONCYLINDER AND INLETSOLIDSSTORAGE SUMPSEPARATIONSCREENINLET PIPESEE ELEVATION SUMMARYFOR SIZEPVC HYDRAULIC SHEARPLATE(4'-0" [1219])FLOWOIL BAFFLE SKIRTA60" [1524] I.D. MANHOLESTRUCTUREVARIES - SEE ELEVATION SUMMARY THIS SHEET+/-65°MAX.FIBERGLASS SEPARATIONCYLINDER AND INLETTOP SLAB ACCESS(SEE FRAME AND COVERDETAIL)CONTRACTOR TO GROUTTO FINISHED GRADEGRADERINGS/RISERSAFLOW1'-0" [305]1'-0" [305]GRANULARBACKFILLOUTLET PIPE - SEEELEVATIONSUMMARY FORSIZECONTRACTOR TOPROVIDE BOOTEDCONNECTION TOEXISTING STORMPIPES (TYP. OF ALL)FRAME AND COVERN.T.S.STORMPROJECT NO...........2011020CHECKED BY...................LEWSCALE....................AS NOTEDDATE............................12/18/15DRAWN BY....................JBDSHEET NO.CDS DETAILVILLAGE AT DORSET PARK - POND IMPROVEMENTSSWIFT STREET EXTENSIONSOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONTC-66 OF 7 SHEETSGENERAL NOTES1. CONTECH TO PROVIDE ALL MATERIALS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.2. DIMENSIONS MARKED WITH ( ) ARE REFERENCE DIMENSIONS. ACTUAL DIMENSIONS MAY VARY.3. CDS WATER QUALITY STRUCTURE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL DESIGN DATA AND INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING.4. STRUCTURE SHALL MEET AASHTO HS20 AND CASTINGS SHALL MEET HS20 (AASHTO M 306) LOAD RATING, ASSUMING GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONAT, OR BELOW, THE OUTLET PIPE INVERT ELEVATION. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO CONFIRM ACTUAL GROUNDWATER ELEVATION.5. PVC HYDRAULIC SHEAR PLATE IS PLACED ON SHELF AT BOTTOM OF SCREEN CYLINDER. REMOVE AND REPLACE AS NECESSARY DURINGMAINTENANCE CLEANING.INSTALLATION NOTESA. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE EQUIPMENT WITH SUFFICIENT LIFTING AND REACH CAPACITY TO LIFT AND SET THE CDS MANHOLE STRUCTURE(LIFTING CLUTCHES PROVIDED).B. CONTRACTOR TO ADD JOINT SEALANT BETWEEN ALL STRUCTURE SECTIONS, AND ASSEMBLE STRUCTURE.C. SWIRL SEPARATORS SHALL BE PRECAST WITH FLEXIBLE BOOT CONNECTION, PIPES ARE NOT TO BE GROUTED IN PLACE. CONTRACTOR TOPROVIDE, INSTALL PIPES. MATCH PIPE INVERTS WITH ELEVATIONS SHOWN.D. CONTRACTOR TO TAKE APPROPRIATE MEASURES TO ASSURE UNIT IS WATER TIGHT, HOLDING WATER TO FLOWLINE INVERT MINIMUM. IT ISSUGGESTED THAT ALL JOINTS BELOW PIPE INVERTS ARE GROUTED.CDS2020-5-C-DTL AND CDS2025-5-C-DTL INLINE CDS DETAILNOT TO SCALE5C-6CDS ELEVATION SUMMARYMODEL #WATERQUALITYFLOWRATE (CFS)PEAKFLOWRATE (CFS)RETURNPERIOD OFPEAKFLOW(YRS)SCREENAPERTURE(2400 OR 4700)PIPE INLETELEV. (FEET)*PIPE OUTLETELEV. (FEET)*PIPEMATERIALINLET PIPEDIAMETER(INCHES)*OUTLETPIPEDIAMETER(INCHES)*RIMELEVATION(FEET)*CDS #1 CDS2020-5-C 1.04 8.21 10 2400 326.48 326.41 PVC 24 24 ±332.00CDS #2 CDS2025-5-C 1.35 6.75 10 2400 329.58 329.33 PVC 15 15 ±335.00CDS #3 CDS2020-5-C0.803.2710 2400 316.59316.56 PVC 24 24±321.80CDS #4 CDS2020-5-C1.01 4.20 10 2400318.16318.08PVC 24 24±324.00 * ELEVATIONS AND PIPE DIAMETERS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPMENT ORDERING. ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS TO BE VERIFIED. CONTRACTOR TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RELOCATION OR REPAIR OF ANY UTILITIES DAMAGED DURING INSTALLATION OFCONTECH UNITSCDS #1 UTILITY CLEARANCE DETAIL1C-6CDS #2 UTILITY CLEARANCE DETAIL2C-6CDS #3 UTILITY CLEARANCE DETAIL3C-6CDS #4 UTILITY CLEARANCE DETAIL4C-6SCALE: 1" = 10'feetGraphic Scale10 0 10 4020SCALE: 1" = 10'feetGraphic Scale10 0 10 4020SCALE: 1" = 10'feetGraphic Scale10 0 10 4020SCALE: 1" = 10'feetGraphic Scale10 0 10 4020DESIGN NOTE:CDS #2 (CDS 2025) TO BE CONFIGURED WITHGRATED INLET WITH INLET PIPE. ALL OTHERSSTANDARD CONFIGURATION AS SHOWNREVISION: 01/29/16 - REVISED PER DEC / CITY OF S. BURLINGTON COMMENTSREVISION: 12/30/15 - REVISED PER THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON COMMENTS.NOTE:A. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION.B. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL UTILITY COORDINATION IF RELOCATIONS ARE REQUIRED.C. ALL DISTURBED SIDEWALK, ROADWAYS AND PRIVATE DRIVES TO BE REPLACED AS NECESSARY - MATCH EXISTING IN ALL CASES.C5 LAKE STREETST. ALBANS, VERMONT 05478PHONE - (802) 524-9300 FAX - (802) 524-9700COPYRIGHT 2016 - RUGGIANO ENGINEERING, INC. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD SP_15_79_372DorsetStreet_Svitarksy_grouphome_Feb_2_2 016_mtg DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: January 29, 2016 Plans received: December 18, 2015 372 DORSET STREET SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-15-79 Meeting date: February 2, 2016 Owner Sisters and Brothers Investment Group, LLP S. Winooski Avenue Burlington, VT 05401 Property Information Tax Parcel 0570-00372 Central District 4 Zoning District Applicant Jon Svitarsky 334 Crown Point Road Bridport, VT 05734 Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SP_15_79_372DorsetStreet_Svitarksy_grouphome_Feb_2_2016_mtg.doc PROJECT DESCRIPTION Site plan application #SP-15-79 of Jon Svitarsky to amend a previously approved plan for a 7,020 sq. ft. building used as a radio and television station. The amendment consists of converting the building to a Group Home (community residence) use to house a maximum of 25 residents, 372 Dorset Street. COMMENTS Administrative Officer Ray Belair and Planner Temporary Assignment Dan Albrecht, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on 12/18/15 and have the following comments. ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS No changes to lot size, coverage or setbacks are proposed. There are no changes proposed to the exterior of the building. The proposed use would change from one allowed use to another allowed use. A Group Home is defined, in part, as follows in the City’s LDRs: Group home. A facility or dwelling unit housing persons unrelated by marriage, blood, adoption, fosterage, or guardianship and operating as a group family household. A group home may be established as a half-way house, recovery home, or home for orphans, foster children, the handicapped or disabled, the elderly, or battered children and women. The facility shall be licensed and operated in accordance with applicable law. It may also be known as a group care facility. It is not group quarters; ……. 13.12 Group Homes A. General Requirements. Title 24 Vermont Statutes Annotated, Section 4412(G) provides that "A residential care home or group home to be operated under state licensing or registration, serving not more than eight persons who have a handicap or disability as defined in 9 VSA Section 4501, shall be considered by right to constitute a permitted single-family residential use of property except that no such home shall be so considered if it locates within 1,000 feet of another existing or permitted such home.” B. Specific Requirements. (1) Proposed group homes that are located more than 1,000 linear feet in any direction of another existing or permitted group home, and which serve more than eight (8) persons are permitted uses, subject to the supplemental review standards in Section 14.11 (B). (2) Any group home proposed to be located within 1,000 linear feet in any direction of another existing or permitted group home shall be reviewed by the DRB as a conditional use. See Article 14, Site Plan and Conditional Use Review. Based upon section 13.12, the proposal is subject to Section 14.11(B) which reads as follows: B. Group homes. Group homes as described in Section 13.12(B) shall be subject to the following supplemental standards: (1) The minimum lot size required for the establishment of a group home shall be the same as that required for other dwellings in the district in which it is located, except that the minimum lot size requirement shall be increased by ten percent (10%) for each non-supervisory resident in excess of CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SP_15_79_372DorsetStreet_Svitarksy_grouphome_Feb_2_2016_mtg.doc five (5). There is no minimum lot size in Central District 4. (2) In addition to all other normally required items of information, the following additional documentation shall also be submitted with the conditional use or site plan application, as applicable: (a) …. (e) This section is not applicable as it conflicts with state and federal law. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. No changes to the building, to planting, to pedestrian movement or to parking are proposed. See the Director of Public Works’s comments regarding parking and staff notes regarding design review. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Parking is located to the side of the building and no changes are proposed. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The height of the building will remain unchanged and below 35 feet. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. No such exterior alterations or building expansions are proposed. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. There is only one building on the site. There is extensive vegetation and trees along the south side of the parcel screening the building. No changes are proposed. (f) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. No changes to the building are proposed. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SP_15_79_372DorsetStreet_Svitarksy_grouphome_Feb_2_2016_mtg.doc Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. The property shares a driveway with the 370 Dorset Street building. It is staff’s position that no reservation of land is necessary. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire-served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). There are neither waste, recycling nor composting facilities indicated on the plans. 1. The Board should ask the applicant to describe how waste, recycling and compost will be managed. (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements As there is no building construction proposed for this site, there are no new minimum landscaping requirements. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the plans shall depict snow storage areas that will minimize the potential for run-off. The plans indicate that snow would be hauled off-site. 2. The Board should ask the applicant to confirm whether snow will continue to be hauled off site and if not to indicate the location of snow storage areas. Traffic There is no category of Group Home or Homeless Shelter in the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Given the nature of the proposed use, staff believes that the proposal would generate less traffic than that generated by the prior radio station use. DESIGN REVIEW OVERLAY DISTRICTS DR 11.01 City Center Design Review Overlay District (CCDR) 11.02 Site Design for City Center Design Review District 11.03 Commercial District 1 Design Review Overlay District [Reserved] CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SP_15_79_372DorsetStreet_Svitarksy_grouphome_Feb_2_2016_mtg.doc 11.01 City Center Design Review Overlay District CCDR A. Purpose. A City Center Design Review Overlay District (CCDR) is hereby formed in order to promote development of the proposed South Burlington City Center as an attractive and cohesive area in which the citizens of South Burlington can take pride. It is the intent of this overlay district to ensure that the design of future development is aesthetically and functionally compatible with the desired character for this area of the City, as stated in the Comprehensive Plan. It is recognized that good design will help create and maintain a sense of place for the community, promote its self-awareness, and strengthen the business and civic elements of the community. B. Comprehensive Plan. These regulations hereby implement the relevant provisions of the City of South Burlington adopted comprehensive plan and are in accord with the policies set forth therein. C. City Center Design Review Overlay Districts and Purpose Statements. The CCDR Overlay District is divided into the following three (3) sub-zones as depicted on the South Burlington Overlay Districts Map: Design District 1, Design District 2, and Design District 3. A brief description of the location and proposed design character of each district is provided below: (1) Design District 1 - …………….. (2) Design District 2 - This area includes all land on both sides of San Remo Drive. This area is unique in that it is the only area in the designated City Center which is substantially developed with buildings and uses. Many of the buildings, however, are in need of updating and aesthetic improvement. The City’s vision for this area is that of a somewhat unique and eclectic neighborhood with a wide variety in design in terms of color, materials, building shapes and site layouts. It is the City’s vision that the existing buildings and sites be improved for example by replacing metal facades with higher quality materials, adding windows and doors to the first floors, and doing improvements to the sites to better relate the properties to the public street thereby promoting pedestrian movement. (3) Design District 3 - ……………………. D. Activities Subject to Design Review. (1) In addition to the provisions of any other section(s) of these regulations, the uses allowed in any underlying district in the City Center Design Review Overlay District shall be subject to the standards and procedures in this Section. Except as hereinafter provided, no person shall do or cause to be done any of the following acts with respect to any building or property located within the CCDR Overlay District without first obtaining design plan approval from the Development Review Board: (a) Construction or relocation of a building or structure (b) Addition to or alteration of the exterior wall of a building or structure by tearing down or removing any portion thereof, or, by filling in, sealing, boarding up, closing or enclosing any portion of an existing window, door space, porch, or promenade thereon. (c) Change of use (see Section (2) below) (d) Alteration of the roofline of a building. (e) Addition or removal of materials to or from the exterior walls of a building, where the materials so added or exposed are of a kind or type different from those existing, including differences in color. (Note: any erection, alteration or relocation of a sign, including a change in CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SP_15_79_372DorsetStreet_Svitarksy_grouphome_Feb_2_2016_mtg.doc color or lettering, is subject to review under the South Burlington Sign Ordinance). (f) Construction, enlargement or alteration of any non-landscaped area on the property including, but not limited to, parking areas, access lanes, sidewalks, loading areas or storage areas, or, any removal or change to landscaping on the site. (g) For applications involving a change of use with no construction, relocation, enlargement or alteration subject to review, other than a change of use pursuant to Section (2) below, the Development Review Board may require design improvement in accordance with these regulations to the exterior of the building, the costs of which do not exceed $7,000 or 10% of the assessed value of the building, whichever is greater. The applicant does not involve any of items a-f listed above. The proposed use is changing from one approved use to another. The current assessed value of the building is $288,800. This property is located in the City Center Design Review District. Section 11.01 (F) (1) (g) states in part: “…. In all Design Districts, for existing buildings undergoing renovation, improvements shall be done to relate the building better to the public street. Such improvements could include the installation of doors and windows along the sides of the building facing the public street, or the construction of walkways between the building and street”. The subject building has windows facing the street, but does not have a door. It is the City’s vision that existing buildings in the design district be improved. Examples of improvements include: adding windows and doors to the first floors, and doing improvements to the sites to better relate the properties to the public street thereby promoting pedestrian movement. In order to further the above stated goal, staff recommends that the portion of the building which is not covered with vinyl siding be repainted as the paint appears to be peeling in some areas and that the Board discuss adding a functional door to the front of the building along Dorset Street. 3. The Board should determine if it will require the design improvement recommended above in accordance with these regulations to the exterior of the building, the costs of which do not exceed $28,880. (2) Any interior alterations or changes that do not affect, change or add to the exterior of the structure, or involve a change in use, shall not be subject to design review. There are neither anticipated changes nor additions to the exterior of the structure. (3) Any construction or alternation of municipal education facilities in Design Review Overlay District 1 shall not be subject to design review. Not applicable. (4) Any construction or alternation of one or two family homes on parcels of 15,000 square feet or less in Design Overlay Districts 2 and 3 shall not be subject to design review. Not applicable. Public Works Comments In an email to staff dated January 6, 2016 the Department of Public Works commented as follows: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SP_15_79_372DorsetStreet_Svitarksy_grouphome_Feb_2_2016_mtg.doc Below are comments on the site plan for the referenced project based on a drawing prepared by Gernier Engineering, PC, revised on 3-26-14. 1. No utilities are shown on this plan. Based on discussions I’ve had with CWD, our staff and the applicant, they are proposing to install a new water sprinkler service. Our plans indicate this is a less than straight forward job given the depth and complexity of the adjacent utilities. No plan is provided to show how this work would be accomplished with minimal impact on adjacent city infrastructure. 2. The driveway/parking lot shows a circulation pattern and parking spaces, but it does not contain curb cuts or other markings making it difficult to tell if their design would actually work. Thanks, Justin Rabidoux Director of Public Works/City Engineer 5. The Board should request the applicant to revise the plan to comply with the recommendations of the Public Works Director. In an email to staff dated January 7, 2016 the Deputy Stormwater Superintendent commented as follows: The Stormwater Section has reviewed the “372 Dorset LLC” site plan prepared by Grenier Engineering, PC, dated 8/6/04 and most recently updated on 3/26/14. We do not have any comments. I believe that Justin will be sending over comments separately. Thanks, Dave David P. Wheeler Assistant Stormwater Superintendent 6. The Board should request the applicant to revise the plan and work with the Assistant Stormwater Superintendent to address his concerns. Other Issues Storage Use: It has come to staff’s attention that the property owner is using the eastern portion of the building for storage. As stated in Section 8.03 of the LDR’s such use is expressly prohibited. Water and Wastewater Approvals: Prior to submission of an application for a zoning permit, the applicant should obtain water and wastewater approvals for the proposed use. RECOMMENDATION The Board should seek clarification on the issues identified above. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SP_15_79_372DorsetStreet_Svitarksy_grouphome_Feb_2_2016_mtg.doc Respectfully submitted, ________________________________ Ray Belair, Administrative Officer Copy to: Jon Svitarsky, applicant CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD SD_15_47_1200AirportDrive_BurlingtonIntlAirport_car_rental_car_wash_and_fuel_canopy_sketch_ DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: January 29, 2016 Plans received: December 31, 2015 SKETCH PLAN REVIEW #SD-15-47 CITY OF BURLINGTON / BURLINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT – 1200 AIRPORT DRIVE Meeting Date: February 2, 2016 Applicant /Owner Burlington International Airport/City of Burlington 1200 Airport Drive, #1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD_15_47_1200AirportDrive_BurlingtonIntlAirport_car_rental_car_wash_and_fuel_canopy_sketch_.doc PROJECT DESCRIPTION Sketch plan application #SD-15-47 of City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport to amend a previously approved plan for an airport complex. The amendment consists of: 1) razing an existing car wash facility, 2) constructing a new 11,665 sq. ft. auto rental car wash facility, and 3) constructing a 5,970 sq. ft. 12 position fueling canopy, 1200 Airport Drive. COMMENTS Administrative Officer Ray Belair, and Dan Albrecht, Planner Temporary Assignment referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on December 31, 2015 and offer the following comments: Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements: The property is located in the Airport District. Table 1. Dimensional Requirements Airport Zoning District Required Existing Existing √ Min. Lot Size 3 acres 770 acres n/a √ Max. Building Coverage 30% n/a n/a √ Max. Overall Coverage 50% n/a n/a √ Front Yard Coverage 30 % n/a n/a √ Min. Front Setback 50 ft. n/a n/a √ Min. Side Setback 35 ft. n/a n/a √ Min. Rear Setback 50 ft. n/a n/a √- zoning compliance The current 770 acre parcel is in compliance with these requirements. 1. Staff recommends that the Board ask that at Preliminary and Final Plan the applicant provide updated information on Existing and Proposed Building Coverage, Overall Coverage and Front Yard Coverage PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, PUDs shall comply with the following standards and conditions: (A)(1)Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. The project appears to have minimal impacts on existing water and wastewater use. Full compliance with this standard will be addressed in detail at Final Plat review. (A)(2)Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. An erosion control plan has not yet been submitted. Full compliance with this standard will be addressed in CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD_15_47_1200AirportDrive_BurlingtonIntlAirport_car_rental_car_wash_and_fuel_canopy_sketch_.doc detail at Final Plat review. (A)(3)The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. The project will have no impact on vehicular traffic. Full compliance with this standard will be addressed in detail at Final Plat review. (A)(4)The project’s design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. There are no wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy nor unique natural features on the area of the airport’s taxiways and runways that would be affected by this project. (A)(5)The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. The applicant has provided renderings of the buildings. 2. Staff recommends that the Board review the renderings and provide feedback on whether they are comfortable with the proposed designs being submitted at Preliminary/Final Plat application. (A)(6)Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. There are no open space areas on this portion of the property that would be affected by this project. (A)(7)The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The South Burlington Fire Department does not provide primary response services to incidents at the Airport. This criterion is not applicable. (A)(8)Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The proposed project appears at this juncture to be compatible with the extension of such services. See comments on Stormwater below. (A)(10)The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff considers that the proposed project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the Airport Zoning District. Full compliance with this standard will be addressed in detail at Final Plat review. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD_15_47_1200AirportDrive_BurlingtonIntlAirport_car_rental_car_wash_and_fuel_canopy_sketch_.doc SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: A. Relationship of Proposed Development to the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Due attention by the applicant should be given to the goals and objectives and the stated land use policies for the City of South Burlington as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff considers that this criterion is being met. Full compliance with this standard will be addressed in detail at Final Plat review. B. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site. (1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. As noted above, the Board should review the renderings and provide feedback on whether they are comfortable with the proposed designs being submitted at Preliminary/Final Plat application. (2) Parking: (a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Any side of a building facing a public street shall be considered a front side of a building for the purposes of this subsection. Parking is located to the side of the parking garage building which forms the primary building line facing Airport Drive. (b) The Development Review Board may approve parking between a public street and one or more buildings if the Board finds that one or more of the following criteria are met. The Board shall approve only the minimum necessary to overcome the conditions below. Not applicable. (3) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or anticipated adjoining buildings. As noted above, the Board should review the renderings and provide feedback on whether they are comfortable with the proposed designs being submitted at Preliminary/Final Plat application. The proposed buildings would be 20 ft. for the administrative building and 17 ft. for the fuel canopy. (4) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansion shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Compliance with this standard will be addressed in detail at Preliminary and Final Plat review. C. Relationship of Structures and Site to Adjoining Area. (1) The Development Review Board shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics (e.g., rhythm, color, texture, form or detailing), landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD_15_47_1200AirportDrive_BurlingtonIntlAirport_car_rental_car_wash_and_fuel_canopy_sketch_.doc buildings of different architectural styles. (2) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. As noted above, the Board should review the renderings and provide feedback on whether they are comfortable with the proposed designs being submitted at Preliminary/Final Plat application. In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: A. Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not consider that the reservation of land is necessary. B. Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire-served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. C. Disposal of Wastes. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The project will be served by existing dumpsters and other facilities on the property. D. Landscaping and Screening Requirements. (See Article 13, Section 13.06) Pursuant to Section 13.06(A) of the proposed Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to planned unit development review. The minimum landscape requirement for this project is determined by Table 13-9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The costs of street trees are above and beyond this minimum landscape requirement. The total construction cost for the building is unknown at this point. The minimum landscaping requirement would be calculated as follows: Total Building Construction or Building Improvement Cost % of Total Construction/ Improvement Cost Cost of proposed project $0 - $250,000 3% t.b.d Next $250,000 2% t.b.d Additional over $500,000 1% of $760 t.b.d Minimum Landscaping $ >> t.b.d Proposed Landscaping t.b.d CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD_15_47_1200AirportDrive_BurlingtonIntlAirport_car_rental_car_wash_and_fuel_canopy_sketch_.doc Full compliance with this standard will be addressed in detail at Final Plat review. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the plans shall depict snow storage areas that will minimize the potential for run-off or indicate that snow will be trucked off site. The applicant has not yet provided a landscaping plan. 3. Staff recommends that the applicant work with staff in preparing its landscaping plan prior to Preliminary/Final Plat submittal. Stormwater In an email to staff dated January 7, 2016, the Department of Public Works commented as follows: The Stormwater Section has reviewed the “Rental Car Quick Turnaround Area” sketch plan prepared by Pierce Goodwin Alexander & Linville, dated 9/18/14, with a cover sheet prepared by Stantec dated 10/8/15. We would like to offer the following comments: 1. On a future submission, please indicate the Total Impervious Area, as well as Proposed New Impervious Area and Redeveloped/Substantially Reconstructed Existing Impervious Surface, as defined in the City’s Land Development Regulations (LDRs). For projects where the combination of New Impervious Area and Redeveloped/Substantially Reconstructed Existing Impervious Surface is equal to or greater than 5,000 sf, the application must meet the requirements of Section 12. 03(C) of the LDRs. If the area of the lot or parcel being redeveloped or substantially reconstructed is less than 50% of the lot’s existing impervious surface area, then only those portions of the lot or parcel that are being redeveloped or substantially reconstructed must comply with all parts of Section 12. 03(C) of the LDRs. If the area of the lot or parcel being redeveloped or substantially reconstructed exceeds 50% of the lot or parcel’s existing impervious surface area, then all of the lot or parcel’s impervious surfaces must comply with all parts of Section 12. 03(C) of the LDRs. All new impervious surfaces must comply with Section 12. 03(C). Please refer to the Draft Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission November 10, 2015 for these requirements. Thank you for the opportunity to comment, Dave David P. Wheeler Assistant Stormwater Superintendent 4. The Board should direct the applicant to comply with the Department’s comments prior to submission of a Preliminary and/or Final Plat Application. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING SD_15_47_1200AirportDrive_BurlingtonIntlAirport_car_rental_car_wash_and_fuel_canopy_sketch_.doc RECOMMENDATION Seek clarification on the questions raised above, and presuming satisfactory answers, allow this to move forward through final plat review. Respectfully submitted, ________________________________ Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer Copy to: Gene Richards, applicant