Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - Development Review Board - 03/17/2015 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 17 March 2015, at 7:00 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: T. Barritt, Chair; M. Behr, B. Miller, J. Smith, D. Parsons, J. Wilking, B. Breslend Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; B. Frisbie, C. Collins, T. Chittenden, D. Albrecht, D. Seff, M. Scollins, S. Dopp, J. Behnke, C. Snyder, D. & P. Warshaw, M. Courcelle, G. Cummings, R. Roesler, D. Bell, D. Hernberg, E. Milizia, B. Alverez, P. Wolcott, A. Bolger, D. Camaiani, J. Larkin, C. Lisman, 1. Additions, deletions, or changes in order of agenda items: It was noted that the applicant for item #8 had just requested a continuance. Members agreed to deal with that when the item came up. 2. Comments and questions from the public not related to the agenda: No issues were raised. 3. Announcements: There were no announcements. 4. Final Plat Application #SD-15-06 of Sterling Construction, Inc., to create three footprint lots, 119, 123 and 127 South Jefferson Road: The applicant showed the division of lots on the plan. The property is located at the corner of Frost Street & Madison Lane. No issues were raised. Mr. Miller moved to close #SD-15-06. Mr. Wilking seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site Plan Application #SP-15-06 of The Village at Dorset Park Homeowners Association to amend a previously approved plan for a 167 unit residential complex. The amendment consists of upgrading the community stormwater system, Swift Street Extension: Mr. Collins noted the retention ponds were built in the ‘80s when there will different standards from now. The Village at Dorset Park has been working with the city so the city can take over permitting and maintenance of the ponds. One of the requirements for this to happen is that the ponds be brought up to standard. There are three ponds. The plan is to line the side slopes of the ponds with stone to correct some undermining, possibly attributable to moles or other animals. They will also do a few upgrades and clear out areas where pipes discharge into the ponds. Tom DiPietro will check all the lines before anything is accepted by the city. There will be a safety fence around the ponds, replacing the old fencing. The new fence will be split rail with a mesh backing to keep animals and children from getting into the ponds. The Association is also working with the State to meet State regulations. Someone from the State will also sign off on the project. Trees in the areas of impact will be identified. No issues were raised. Mr. Miller moved to close #SP-15-06. Ms. Smith seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Miscellaneous Application #MS-15-01 of Vermont Gas Systems, Inc., for the installation of residential gas lines for condominiums in the Twin Oaks development with proposed impacts to 68 sq. ft. of wetland and 5,750 sq. ft. of wetland buffer zone, Twin Oaks Terrace: The applicant explained that they will be installing residential gas lines to serve the Twin Oaks condos. She showed where the lines would tie into existing lines to bring service into the community. She also showed wetland areas which were delineated by an ANR specialist. The project will not involve going into the wetland or destroying any trees, but because of a culvert, there is a disturbance of 68 feet where they will be drilling and creating a space where they need to work safely. There is a wetland buffer behind the complex that may or may not be drilled (it may be safer to open dig in that area). They have met with the City Arborist and he had comments regarding preservation of trees. He is OK with their preservation plans. Mr. Belair noted the applicant has a state permit, and staff has no concerns with the project. Mr. Miller moved to close #MS-15-01. Mr. Wilking seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Continued Sketch Plan Application #SD-14-37 of Snyder Homes for a planned unit development on 26.15 acres developed with two single family dwellings. The project consists of: 1) razing one single family dwelling, 2) constructing 26 single family dwellings, 3) constructing seven 3-unit multi-family dwellings, and 4) constructing three 2-family dwellings, 1302, 1340 and 1350 Spear Street: Mr. Snyder noted they have revised the location of the public park. They still need to meet with the Leisure Arts and Park people regarding the location, etc. They need to add a garden space and will do that. They will provide an easement for the rec path along the eastern line which is where it was on the previously approved sketch plan. They don’t propose to build the path since it doesn’t connect to anything to the north or south. There are now only 2 home sites on the private road. There will be interruptions of the sidewalk along Vale Drive as garages will be front-loaded. They will provide documents regarding TDRs at final plat. Changes to the plan include: At the corner of Spear and Spear Meadows Drive, there will be a carriage home of single family home fronting on Spear Street. Mr. Snyder showed the location of the proposed park next to an existing open space area. Mr. Snyder noted that Vale Drive neighbors were concerned with pass-thru traffic, so there are now as many 90 degree turns as possible to discourage that and slow traffic down. The homes on Vale Drive will now be duplexes with garages in front (set back 8 feet). They have kept single family/carriage homes #1-13. They will be one-story with a roof above. They are about 1600-2000 sq. ft. The triplexes are 2-story with garages in back, 1500-1700 sq. ft. The storm water area is not yet finalized. Mr. Barritt noted that unit #39 impinges on the wetland and will also interrupt a view corridor. Mr. Snyder said the existing tree line already impacts the view. Mr. Parsons asked if the backs of the triplexes can access the sidewalk. Mr. Snyder said they can. Mr. Barritt asked about parking for the triplexes. Mr. Snyder said there are 2-car garages for each unit. Cars can also be parking in the driveways. There could be some guest parking in an open area. Mr. Barritt asked about on- street parking. Mr. Belair said that is up to the applicant. Mr. Barritt asked if there will be curb cuts for every duplex unit. Mr. Snyder said some may be combined. Mr. Parsons said he would like to see a strip to delineate the spaces. Mr. Albrecht said staff is trying to reduce the number of curb cuts on Vale Drive and suggested units #37 and #38 come off Spear Meadow. Mr. Snyder said that would change the dynamic. He noted that entrances to those homes are on the side. Mr. Barritt questioned the length of Vale Drive. Mr. Albrecht said it could be broken up with a clear pedestrian crossing. Mr. Barritt noted that staff recommends TDRs be done at preliminary plat, not final. Mr. Snyder said they have no problem having options for preliminary and clear ownership by unit #32. Mr. Barritt noted that the mix of housing styles is very important. He felt the triplexes should be tastefully done to be congruous with the neighborhood. Mr. Wilking felt the community gardens should be convenient to the housing. He was OK with the park, now that it’s been expanded. Mr. Parsons felt it would make sense to have the gardens in the buffer area. Mr. Seff, representing some of the neighbors, said they have many concerns. The primary one is density and the TDR by-law. Mr. Barritt said the Board cannot comment on TDRs, other than the fact that other developments have used them. Mr. Seff notes that sketch plan application asks where TDRs are coming from, and that question hasn’t been answered. Mr. Belair said that is not a requirement, just for some information. Mr. Seff said TDRs have been interpreted as “automatic.” They feel it is up to the board to determine if they can be used and how many. Since they feel the density is inappropriate, they are asking the Board to limit TDRs. They also feel the TDR by‐law wasn’t properly drafted. Dr. Scollins said he never imagined he’d have 5 houses abutting his property. He felt the proposed development was very incompatible here. He also noted the rec path will have to come out further to avoid large trees. He said it should be built now or it will probably never be built. He felt the location of the park was “a joke” as the area is so swampy and only the southeast corner is usable where it is 9‐10 feet higher. Mr. Warshaw, a Pinnacle resident, noted that TDRs are designed to save natural resources and that the Board can grant all or part of the TDR request. He also noted the Southeast Quadrant regulations have a statement that existing development should be protected from inappropriate development. Mr. Miller then moved to continue #SD-14-37 until 19 May 2015. Mr. Parsons seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Continued Conditional Use Application #CU-15-01 of Richard B. White to expand a nonconforming single family dwelling to 2,574 sq. ft. by constructing two additions of 5’x 8’x10’ and 19’x 19’‐6” and constructing a 19’x 27’ 2‐ story detached accessory structure to contain a 772 sq. ft. accessory residential unit, 56 Central Avenue: Mr. Barritt noted the applicant has requested a continuance. Mr. Miller moved to continue #CU-15-01 to 7 April 2015. Mr. Wilking seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. Site Plan Application #SP-15-05 of Glenn Cummings to construct a 10,500 sq. ft. mixed use commercial/industrial building to include an umbrella approval, 2 Ethan Allen Drive: Mr. Cummings showed the lot. The plan is to build a warehouse type of building. They have agreed on a mix of uses with staff and are asking for an umbrella permit for those uses. They are agreeable to complying with the City Arborist’s requests. Mr. Cummings noted they have revised plans that address the concern with pedestrian movement. Mr. Belair noted staff hadn’t seen these plans. Mr. Courcelle showed the plan to finish the existing sidewalk and paint an area in front of the parking spaces to indicate the sidewalk. He also showed the location of a bike rack. They will still meet the coverage requirements. The applicant then showed the landscaping plan and identified a storm water pond. He indicated a wetland adjacent to the property. They will not impinge on this or on the wetland buffer. Snow storage will be to the left of the dumpster. Mr. Cummings showed this on the plan. Mr. Courcelle noted they will need a storm water permit but not a construction storm water permit. They will confirm the size of both infiltration basins. After a brief discussion, Mr. Cummings asked for 12 peak hour trip ends. Mr. Belair was OK with this. Mr. Miller then moved to close #SP-15-05. Mr. Wilking seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10. Reopen final plat application #SD-15-02 of Halvorsen Development to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of: 1) a 9,356 sq. ft. 275 seat standard restaurant, 2) a 71 room hotel (Comfort Suites) and an 89-room hotel. The amendment consists of: 1) razing the 275 seat restaurant building, 2) constructing 11,242 sq. ft. retail building, and 3) constructing a 10’x55’ detached accessory structure, 1 Dorset Street: Mr. Roesler said they are asking to move some lot lines and to move the pergola 29 feet to the north (to avoid straddling the lease line). Landscaping will shift with the pergola. They have also been asked to remove landscaping that is over the lease line. Ms. Bell noted they have a $500 landscaping “cushion.” Mr. Belair said staff may want to check on this with the arborist. He noted staff does not have to agree to move the landscaping as this is a PUD. Mr. Barritt said he would like it to stay and suggested the applicant talk with the landlord. Members agreed they wanted to keep the landscaping. Mr. Miller moved to continue #SD-15-02 until 7 April. Ms. Smith seconded. Motion passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned by common consent at 9:20 p.m. , Clerk ____________________________, Date Published by ClerkBase ©2019 by Clerkbase. No Claim to Original Government Works. #SD-15-06 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING STERLING CONSTRUCTION, INC. SOUTH VILLAGE – 334 UNIT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 119, 123 & 127 South Jefferson Road FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-15-06 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Sterling Construction, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking approval for final plat application #SD-14-31 to create three (3) footprint lots, 119, 123 & 127 South Jefferson Road. The Development Review Board held a public hearing on Tuesday, March 17, 2015. Bart Frisbie represented the applicant. Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The project consists of Sterling Construction, Inc. seeking approval for final plat application #SD-14-31 to create three (3) footprint lots, 119, 123 & 127 South Jefferson Road. 2. The owner of record of the subject properties is Sterling Construction, Inc. 3. The application was received on February 9, 2015. 4. The subject property is located in the Southeast Quadrant Zoning subdistrict. 5. The plan submitted is entitled “Lands of Sterling Construction Frost St. & Madison Ln., South Burlington, VT Lot 45 Townhouses”, dated January 15, 2015 and prepared by Lamoreux & Dickinson Consulting Engineers, Inc. Dimensional Standards: The applicant proposes to create three (2) footprint lot lines in between the individual dwelling units and including front and year yard areas with each dwelling unit previously approved in this subdivision. This action would create non-conforming lots (being of insufficient individual size, and having zero setback in between each unit on a lot) and therefore will not be considered individual lots for the LDRs. For purposes of the LDRs, the three footprint lots included in this proposal shall be considered one lot (Lot 45) as approved previously. The applicant will be required to record a “Notice of Condition” to this effect which has been approved by the City Attorney prior to recording the final plat plan. DECISION Motion by _________, seconded by _____________, to approve final plat application #SD-15-06 of Sterling Construction, Inc. subject to the following conditions: #SD-15-06 2 1. All previous approvals and stipulations for the South Village project shall remain in full effect except as amended herein. 2. This project shall be completed as shown on the plat submitted by the applicant and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. 3. The plat plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Administrative Officer. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plat shall be submitted to the Administrative Officer prior to recording the plat. 4. For purposes of the LDRs, all lots included in this subdivision shall be considered one (1) lot as approved previously. The applicants shall record a “Notice of Condition” to this effect which has been approved by the City Attorney prior to recording the final plat plans. 5. A digital PDF version of the full set of approved final plat shall be delivered to the Administrative Officer before recording the final plat plan. 6. Any changes to the final plat plan shall require approval of the South Burlington Development Review Board. 7. The final plat plan (survey plat) shall be recorded in the land records within 180 days or this approval is null and void. The plat plan shall be signed by the Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plan, the applicant shall submit copies of the survey plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall require approval of the South Burlington GIS Coordinator. Tim Barritt– yea nay abstain not present Mark Behr – yea nay abstain not present Brian Breslend – yea nay abstain not present Bill Miller – yea nay abstain not present David Parsons – yea nay abstain not present Jennifer Smith – yea nay abstain not present John Wilking – yea nay abstain not present _____________________________________ Tim Barritt, Chair Please note: An appeal of this decision may be taken by filing, within 30 days of the date of this decision, a notice of appeal and the required fee by certified mail to the Superior Court, Environmental Division. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b). A copy of the notice of appeal must also be mailed to the City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department at 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b) (4)(A). Please contact the Environmental Division at 802-828-1660 or http://vermontjudiciary.org/GTC/environmental/default.aspx for more information on filing requirements, deadlines, fees and mailing address. The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call 802.879.5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD SP_15_06_SwiftStreetExtension_VillageAtDorsetPark_com m_stormwater_upgrades DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: March 13, 2015 Plans received: February 3, 2015 SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-15-05 VILLAGE AT DORSET PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION - SWIFT STREET EXTENSION Meeting date: March 17, 2015 Owner/Applicant Village at Dorset Park Homeowners Association c/o Stewart Boyd, VP 204 Brand Farm Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Property Information Tax Parcel SEQ – Neighborhood Residential Zoning District CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING F:\USERS\Planning & Zoning\Development Review Board\Staff Comments\WORKING FOLDER STAFF COMMENTS\SP_15_06_SwiftStreetExtension_VillageAtDorsetPark_comm_stormwater_upgrades.doc PROJECT DESCRIPTION Site plan application #SP-15-06 of The Village at Dorset Park Homeowners Association to amend a previously approved plan for a 167 unit residential complex. The amendment consists of upgrading the community stormwater system, Swift Street Extension COMMENTS Director of Planning & Zoning Paul Conner and Planner Temporary Assignment Dan Albrecht, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on February 3, 2015 and have the following comments. Site Plan Review Standards A. Relationship of Proposed Development to the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Due attention by the applicant should be given to the goals and objectives and the stated land use policies for the City of South Burlington as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff considers the proposed improvements to the stormwater system to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. B. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site. (1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. 2) Parking: (a) …….. (b) ………… (c) ………… (d) ………… (3) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or anticipated adjoining buildings. (4) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansion shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. The proposed improvements have little impact on the relationship of the proposed structures to the site. Staff considers this criterion to be met. C. Relationship of Structures and Site to Adjoining Area. (1) The Development Review Board shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics (e.g., rhythm, color, texture, form or detailing), landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. (2) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING F:\USERS\Planning & Zoning\Development Review Board\Staff Comments\WORKING FOLDER STAFF COMMENTS\SP_15_06_SwiftStreetExtension_VillageAtDorsetPark_comm_stormwater_upgrades.doc buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The proposed improvements have little impact on the relationship of structures and site to adjoining area. Staff considers this criterion to be met. 14.07 Specific Review Standards A. Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. No reservation of land is required. B. Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire-served utility lines and service connections shall be underground insofar as feasible and subject to state public utilities regulations. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Not applicable. C. Disposal of Wastes. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). Small receptacles intended for use by households or the public (ie, non-dumpster, non-large drum) shall not be required to be fenced or screened. Not applicable D. Landscaping and Screening Requirements. See Article 13, Section 13.06 Landscaping, Screening, and Street Trees. In a memo to staff dated February 23, 2015 the City Arborist provided the following comments: Tree protection measures should be specified on the plan in areas where equipment access could impact existing trees. Plotting the existing trees on the plan would also be helpful. 1. The Board should direct the applicant to comply with the City Arborist’s recommendations. E. Modification of Standards. Where the limitations of a site may cause unusual hardship in complying with any of the standards above and waiver therefrom will not endanger the public health, safety or welfare, the Development Review Board may modify such standards as long as the general objectives of Article 14 and the City's Comprehensive Plan are met. However, with the exception of side yard setbacks in the Central District 1, in no case shall the DRB permit the location of a new structure less than five (5) feet from any property boundary and in no case shall be the DRB allow land development creating a total site coverage exceeding the allowable limit for the applicable zoning district in the case of new development, or increasing the coverage on sites where the pre-existing condition exceeds the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING F:\USERS\Planning & Zoning\Development Review Board\Staff Comments\WORKING FOLDER STAFF COMMENTS\SP_15_06_SwiftStreetExtension_VillageAtDorsetPark_comm_stormwater_upgrades.doc applicable limit. No waivers requested. STORMWATER In an email to staff dated February 26, 2015, the Department of Public Works provided the following comments: From: Tom Dipietro <tdipietro@sburl.com> Date: February 26, 2015 at 10:57:31 AM EST To: Justin Rabidoux <jrabidoux@sburl.com> Subject: Comments on Village at Dorset Park - Pond Improvements Justin, I reviewed the “Village at Dorset Park – Pond Improvements” site plan prepared by Ruggiano Engineering, Inc, dated 1/21/14 and last updated on 1/29/15. I would like to offer the following comments: 1. The proposed project is located in the Potash Brook watershed. This watershed is listed as stormwater impaired by the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). 2. The stormwater utility has been working closely with the homeowner association and their engineer to develop this project. We have previously reviewed and commented on the plan set and are satisfied with the technical aspects of the proposed improvements. 3. The project proposes to disturb greater than 1 acre of area. It will therefore require a construction stormwater permit from the Vermont DEC Stormwater Division. The applicant should acquire these permits before starting construction. 4. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to regularly maintain all stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. -Tom Thomas J. DiPietro Jr. Deputy Director Department of Public Works 2. The Board should direct the applicant to comply with the Public Works Department’s recommendations. Respectfully submitted, ______________________________ Paul Conner, Planning & Zoning Director CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING F:\USERS\Planning & Zoning\Development Review Board\Staff Comments\WORKING FOLDER STAFF COMMENTS\SP_15_06_SwiftStreetExtension_VillageAtDorsetPark_comm_stormwater_upgrades.doc Copy to: Stewart Boyd, applicant C20 KIMBALL AVE, SUITE 202NSOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403PHONE - (802) 658-2100 FAX - (802) 658-2882COPYRIGHT 2014 - RUGGIANO ENGINEERING, INC.PROJECT NO...........2011020CHECKED BY...................CRCSCALE............................1" = 20'DATE...........................01/21/14DRAWN BY...DJL,NRL,JGESHEET NO.POND 3 SITE PLANSCALE: 1" = 20'1C-4Graphic Scale20 0 20 8040POND 3 SITE PLANVILLAGE AT DORSET PARK - POND IMPROVEMENTSSWIFT STREET EXTENSIONSOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONTC-4feet4 OF 5 SHEETSNOTE:ALL EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPES DISCHARGINGTO PONDS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ACCUMULATEDSEDIMENT, INSPECTED AND REPAIRED AS REQUIRED.REVISION: 01/29/15 - REVISED POND SIDE SLOPES AND RIP-RAP LIMITS.REVISION: 11/05/14 - REVISED PLAN PER THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON COMMENTS.REVISION: 10/09/14 - REVISED PLAN PER THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON COMMENTS. CCOPYRIGHT 2014 - RUGGIANO ENGINEERING, INC.PROJECT NO...........2011020CHECKED BY...................CRCSCALE............................1" = 20'DATE............................01/21/14DRAWN BY...DJL,NRL,JGESHEET NO.POND 2 SITE PLANSCALE: 1" = 20'1C-3Graphic Scale20 0 20 8040POND 2 SITE PLANVILLAGE AT DORSET PARK - POND IMPROVEMENTSSWIFT STREET EXTENSIONSOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONTC-3feet3 OF 5 SHEETS20 KIMBALL AVE, SUITE 202NSOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403PHONE - (802) 658-2100 FAX - (802) 658-2882NOTE:ALL EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPES DISCHARGINGTO PONDS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ACCUMULATEDSEDIMENT, INSPECTED AND REPAIRED AS REQUIRED.REVISION: 01/29/15 - REVISED POND SIDE SLOPES AND RIP-RAP LIMITS.REVISION: 11/05/14 - REVISED PLAN PER THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON COMMENTS.REVISION: 10/09/14 - REVISED PLAN PER THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON COMMENTS. CCOPYRIGHT 2014 - RUGGIANO ENGINEERING, INC.PROJECT NO...........2011020CHECKED BY...................CRCSCALE............................1" = 20'DATE............................01/21/14DRAWN BY...DJL,NRL,JGESHEET NO.POND 1 SITE PLANSCALE: 1" = 20'1C-2Graphic Scale20 0 20 8040POND 1 SITE PLANVILLAGE AT DORSET PARK - POND IMPROVEMENTSSWIFT STREET EXTENSIONSOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONTC-2feet2 OF 5 SHEETS20 KIMBALL AVE, SUITE 202NSOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403PHONE - (802) 658-2100 FAX - (802) 658-2882PROPOSEDVEHICULARACCESS AREAFOR PONDCONSTRUCTIONAND FUTUREMAINTENANCENOTE:ALL EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPES DISCHARGINGTO PONDS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ACCUMULATEDSEDIMENT, INSPECTED AND REPAIRED AS REQUIRED.REVISION: 01/29/15 - REVISED POND SIDE SLOPES AND RIP-RAP LIMITS.REVISION: 11/05/14 - REVISED PLAN PER THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON COMMENTS.REVISION: 10/09/14 - REVISED PLAN PER THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON COMMENTS. CCOPYRIGHT 2014 - RUGGIANO ENGINEERING, INC.PROJECT NO...........2011020CHECKED BY...................CRCSCALE............................1" = 60'DATE...........................01/21/14DRAWN BY.............DJL,JGESHEET NO.C-1 OVERALL SITE PLANC-2 POND 1 SITE PLANC-3 POND 2 SITE PLANC-4 POND 3 SITE PLANC-5 DETAILSSITE LOCATION MAPNOT TO SCALENORTHLIST OF DRAWINGSOVERALL SITE PLANSCALE: 1" = 60'1C-1PLAN REFERENCES:1) TOPOGRAPHY FROM ELECTRONIC FILE ENTITLED "SOUB0165-VILLAGE AT DORSETPARK-BOYD-L&H-WS-070110.DWG" DATED 07-01-10 FROM BUTTON PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS, SOUTHBURLINGTON, VT.2) AERIAL PHOTO FROM VCGI DATABASE "VTORTHO_0_5M_PAN"HTTP://WWW.VCGI.VERMONT.GOV/WAREHOUSE/IMAGERY3) "OVERALL SITE PLAN FOR THE VILLAGE AT DORSET PARK" PREPARED BY FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN, INC.,DATE: FEB 1992, SHEET 1 OF 13, SCALE: 1"=100'4) PROPERTY BOUNDARIES FROM CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY MAP5) THE VILLAGE AT DORSET PARK, PLAT OF SUBDIVISION, SCALE: 1"=50', RECORDED BY SOUTH BURLINGTONCITY CLERK ON OCTOBER 8, 1992, VOLUME 286, PAGE 54OVERALL SITE PLANVILLAGE AT DORSET PARK - POND IMPROVEMENTSSWIFT STREET EXTENSIONSOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONTC-11 OF 5 SHEETSEXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOUR500500PROPOSED STORMWATER DRAINSDSDEXISTING STORMWATER DRAINLEGENDEXISTING POND OUTLET STRUCTUREPROPOSED POND OUTLET STRUCTUREDDEXISTING VOLUME: 135,231 CU. FT.PROPOSED VOLUME: 92,413 CU. FT.EXISTING WATER LEVEL: 322.0PROPOSED WATER LEVEL: 319.0PROPOSEDPOND 1 FOREBAY 1PROPOSEDPOND 1FOREBAY 2PROPOSEDPOND 1 SLOPERECONSTRUCTIONPOND 1EXISTING VOLUME: 560,543 CU. FT.PROPOSED VOLUME: 427,211 CU. FT.EXISTING WATER LEVEL: 327.0PROPOSED WATER LEVEL: 324.0PROPOSEDPOND 2 FOREBAYPROPOSEDPOND 3 FOREBAY 1PROPOSED POND 3 FOREBAY 3PROPOSED POND 3 FOREBAY 2EXISTING VOLUME: 575,777 CU. FT.PROPOSED VOLUME: 492,836 CU. FT.EXISTING WATER LEVEL: 316.00PROPOSED WATER LEVEL: 314.50BRAND FARM DRIVEBRAND FARM DRIVESWIFT STREET EXTENSIONIRIS LANEBLUESTAR LANEIRIS LANELUPINE LANEPROPOSED REPLACEMENT CULVERTPROPOSED REPLACEMENT CULVERTPROPOSED TYPE II STONE LINING(2) EXISTING 36" DIA.STORM DRAINSfeetGraphic Scale60 0 60 240120322322322324326328332328330334336336336334330328326332330332338326324320318316 32232432632833034034034034033833033233033633420 KIMBALL AVE, SUITE 202NSOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403PHONE - (802) 658-2100 FAX - (802) 658-2882EXISTING 24" DIA.STORM DRAINEXISTING 24" DIA.STORM DRAINTO BE REMOVEDEXISTING 24" DIA.STORM DRAINEXISTING 24" DIA.STORM DRAINTO BE REMOVEDEXISTING 18" DIA.STORM DRAINEXISTING 18" DIA.STORM DRAINEXISTING 24"DIA. STORMDRAINEXISTING 24" DIA.STORM DRAINPOND 2POND 3SITELOCATIONEXISTING TENNIS COURTEXISTING TENNIS COURTPROPOSED POND 1OUTLET STRUCTUREPROPOSED POND 2OUTLET STRUCTUREEXISTING POND 3OUTLET STRUCTUREPROPOSED EMERGENCYOVERFLOW SWALEPROPOSED EMERGENCYOVERFLOW SWALEPROPOSED EMERGENCYOVERFLOW SWALEPROPERTY LINEEXISTING CATCH BASINNOTES:1) THIS DRAWING IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY PLAT. BOUNDARY LINE INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED ONPLAN REFERENCE #3, #4 & #5. THE PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS AND OTHER REAL PROPERTYDESCRIPTIONS PROVIDED ON THIS DRAWING ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. THEY DO NOTDEFINE LEGAL RIGHTS OR MEET LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR A LAND SURVEY AS DESCRIBED IN V.S.A.TITLE27 SECTION 1403 AND SHALL NOT BE USED IN LIEU OF A SURVEY AS THE BASIS OF ANY LAND TRANSFER ORESTABLISHMENT OF ANY PROPERTY RIGHT.2) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFYING AND DETERMINING THE LOCATION, SIZE,AND ELEVATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEERSHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR UTILITIES FOUND INTERFERING WITH THEPROPOSED CONSTRUCTION. APPROPRIATE REMEDIAL ACTION SHALL BE TAKEN BEFORE PROCEEDINGWITH THE WORK.3) THIS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF "DIG SAFE" MARKINGS. UTILITYLOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND ARE NOT WARRANTED TO BE EXACT OR COMPLETE. THECONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "DIG SAFE" BEFORE COMMENCING ANY WORK AND SHALL PRESERVE ALLEXISTING UTILITIES NOT SPECIFIED TO BE REMOVED OR ABANDONED AS PART OF THE PROJECT.314312 310RIGHT OF WAY / EASEMENTVILLAGE AT DORSET PARKCLUSTER AVILLAGE AT DORSET PARKCLUSTER EVILLAGE AT DORSET PARKCLUSTER CVILLAGE AT DORSET PARKCLUSTER BVILLAGE AT DORSET PARKCLUSTER DPROPOSED SAFETY FENCE,SPLIT RAIL WITH METALWOVEN WIRE BACKING -EXISTING FENCING TO BEREMOVED, TYP.PROPOSEDSAFETYFENCEPROPOSED CONSTRUCTION,MAINTENANCE & ACCESSEASEMENTPROPOSED CONSTRUCTION,MAINTENANCE & ACCESS EASEMENTPROPOSEDCONSTRUCTION,MAINTENANCE &ACCESS EASEMENTPROPOSEDCONSTRUCTION,MAINTENANCE &ACCESS EASEMENTPROPOSEDCONSTRUCTION,MAINTENANCE &ACCESSEASEMENT, 10'FROM TOP OFPOND SIDESLOPE, TYP.PROPOSED 30' EASEMENTFOR CONSTRUCTION OFOVERFLOW SWALE,STORMWATER PIPINGMAINTENANCE ANDPOND OUTLET ACCESSPROPOSED 20' EASEMENTTO BE USED FOR PIPEAND POND ACCESSPROPOSED 20'EASEMENTPROPOSED 20'EASEMENTPROPOSED 20'EASEMENTPROPOSED 20'EASEMENTPROPOSED 20' WIDEEASEMENT IN FAVOROF CITY OF SOUTHBURLINGTONEXISTING 15' WIDESEWER EASEMENTPROPOSED ACCESSEASEMENT TO CITYOF SO. BURLINGTONNOTE:ALL EXISTING STORM DRAIN PIPES DISCHARGINGTO PONDS SHALL BE CLEANED OF ACCUMULATEDSEDIMENT, INSPECTED AND REPAIRED AS REQUIRED.PROPOSED PONDDRAIN VALVE, TYP.REVISION: 01/29/15 - REVISED POND SIDE SLOPES AND RIP-RAP LIMITS.REVISION: 11/05/14 - REVISED PLAN PER THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON COMMENTS.REVISION: 10/09/14 - REVISED PLAN PER THE CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON COMMENTS.EXISTINGPOOLPROPOSED WATER LEVEL CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MS_15_01_TwinOaksTerrace_VermontGas_wetlands DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: March 13, 2015 Application received: February 11, 2015 Miscellaneous Application #MS-15-01 Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. - Twin Oaks Terrace Meeting date: March 17, 2015 Applicants/Owners Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. PO Box 467 South Burlington, VT 05402 Property Information Tax Parcel ID - various Residential 7 District CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING PROJECT DESCRIPTION Miscellaneous application #MS-15-01 of Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. for the installation of residential gas lines for condominiums in the Twin Oaks development with proposed impacts to 68 square feet of wetland and 5,750 square feet of wetland buffer zone, Twin Oaks Terrace. COMMENTS Planning and Zoning Director Paul Conner and Planner Temporary Assignment Dan Albrecht (“Staff”) have reviewed the plans submitted on February 11, 2015, and offer the following comments. The purpose of the project is to bring residential gas service to the Twin Oaks neighborhood. The proposed pipeline is sited along the road shoulder and in areas of mowed grass behind the condominiums. The The applicant has filed a complete application with the Agency of Natural Resources (ANR), and Vermont Individual Wetland Permit #2014-308 was issued on February 10, 2015. This ANR permit allows the applicant to install residential gas lines for condominiums in the Twin Oaks development and temporarily alter 68 sq. ft. of wetlands and temporarily alter 5,750 sq. ft. of wetland buffer. 12.02 Wetland Protection Standards and Review Procedures A. Purpose. It is the purpose of this Section to provide appropriate protection of the City’s wetland resources in order to protect wetland functions and values related to surface and ground water protection, wildlife habitat, and flood control. B. Comprehensive Plan. These regulations hereby implement the relevant provisions of the City of south Burlington adopted comprehensive plan and are in accord with the policies set forth therein. C. Wetlands Map and Applicability of Standards. (1) All wetland areas within the City of South Burlington, whether identified on the map entitled “Wetlands Map” as set forth in Section 3.02 of these regulations or as identified through field delineation, and a buffer area fifty (50) feet horizontal distance surrounding the boundary of any such wetland, shall be subject to the provisions of this section. (2) In the absence of site-specific delineations, the City’s Wetlands Map shall control as to the location of wetlands and wetland buffer areas subject to the provisions of this section. D. Submittal and Review of Field Delineation and Wetlands Report (1) For all properties for which any application for development requiring DRB review is made, and on which any wetland areas are indicated on the Wetlands Map, applicants are strongly encouraged to submit site specific field delineations indicating the location, classification, functions and values of all wetland areas (Class I, II and III) and an associated fifty (50) foot buffer area. In the absence of such site-specific delineations and information, the City’s Wetlands Map shall control. (2) Applicants are encouraged to submit a field delineation and wetlands report as early in the development review process as possible. (3) The DRB shall have the authority to invoke technical review by a qualified wetlands consultant of any field delineation and wetlands report. The City’s wetlands consultant shall submit an evaluation of the field delineation and wetlands report addressing the proposed development’s consistency with the standards in (D) above, and outlining the following: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING (a) Measures that can be taken to improve the overall effect of the project on wetland resources without altering the layout of the proposed project. (b) Measures that can be taken to improve the overall effect of the project on wetland resources that involve altering the layout of the proposed project. E. Standards for Wetlands Protection (1) Consistent with the purposes of this Section, encroachment into wetlands and buffer areas is generally discouraged. (2) Encroachment into Class II wetlands is permitted by the City only in conjunction with issuance of a Conditional Use Determination (CUD) by the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation and positive findings by the DRB pursuant to the criteria in (3) below. (3) Encroachment into Class II wetland buffers, Class III wetlands and Class III wetland buffers, may be permitted by the DRB upon finding that the proposed project’s overall development, erosion control, stormwater treatment system, provisions for stream buffering, and landscaping plan achieve the following standards for wetland protection: (a) The encroachment(s) will not adversely affect the ability of the property to carry or store flood waters adequately; (b) The encroachment(s) will not adversely affect the ability of the proposed stormwater treatment system to reduce sedimentation according to state standards; (c) The impact of the encroachment(s) on the specific wetland functions and values identified in the field delineation and wetland report is minimized and/or offset by appropriate landscaping, stormwater treatment, stream buffering, and/or other mitigation measures. As described above, the applicant has already obtained a Vermont Individual Wetlands Permit from the state (formerly known as a Conditional Use Determination). The ANR found no undue, adverse impact upon this Class 2 wetland and wetland buffer, and required typical erosion control and other protective measures (as proposed) to protect the wetland and its buffer. It also required post-construction certification within 30 days of completion of the work approved in the permit that the project was constructed in compliance with the conditions of the permit. The above criteria are similar to the criteria used by the Agency of Natural Resources (ANR) in evaluating the encroachment into a class II wetland and wetland buffer, therefore, since the ANR did issue the wetland permit, staff feels the above criteria are met. Landscaping (Tree Protection) In an email to staff dated February 23, 2015 the City Arborist provided the following comments: Proposed gas line passes too close to a number of trees for conventional excavation to be used. Directional boring should be specified and tree protection measures should be specified on the plans. In a letter to the City dated March 9, 2015 Vermont Gas outlined the procedures it uses while installing gas line near and under trees. In an email to staff dated March 10, 2015, the City Arborist indicated that those conditions addressed his concerns. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING Staff recommends that the Board include a condition in its Findings of Fact & Decision that the procedure outline in the March 9, 2015 letter from Vermont Gas be adhered to during the project. Respectfully submitted, ________________________________ Paul Conner, Planning & Zoning Director CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD SD_14_37_1302_1340_1350SpearStreet_SpearMeadows_ sketch_March17_mtg DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: March 13, 2015 Plans received: March 9, 2015 1302, 1340, and 1350 Spear Street Sketch Plan Application #SD-14-37 Meeting date: March 17, 2015 Owner Spear Meadows, Inc Gary N. and Jane G. Farrell 1350 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Applicant Chris Snyder Snyder Homes 4076 Shelburne Road, Suite 6 Shelburne, VT 05482 Engineer Plans not stamped by an Engineer Property Information Tax Parcel 1640-01302; Tax Parcel 1640-01340 Tax Parcel 1640-01350 SEQ Zoning District- Neighborhood Residential 25.91 acres Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING PROJECT DESCRIPTION Sketch plan review application #SD-14-37 of Snyder Homes for a planned unit development on 26.15 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists of: 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 26 single family dwellings, 3) constructing seven (7) 3- unit multi-family dwellings, and 4) constructing three (3) 2-family dwellings, 1302, 1340, & 1350 Spear Street. Proposed development in this area has been discussed in depth at multiple prior DRB meetings in connection with applications #SD-11-51 and #MP-11-03. The proposal has a new applicant under this Sketch Plan, however. COMMENTS The staff notes herein reflect a review of the major topics and are, at this stage, intended to review the basic concept and site design, as well as to advise the applicant as to any potential problems and concerns relating to those major issues. For the purposes of a focused sketch plan discussion, staff has tried to narrow the discussions to the central issues that seem to present themselves at this early stage of the project. Additional items, including but not limited to the specific requirements for landscaping, traffic and other issues certainly warrant a full review and will be addressed in detail at a later stage. Planning & Zoning Director Paul Conner and Planner Temporary Assignment Dan Albrecht, referred to herein as staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on December 15, 2014 and the revised plan submitted on March 6, 2015 and offer the following comments. Note: The revised sketch plan for this meeting was received on March 9th, 2015. Staff from Planning & Zoning have taken a very preliminary look at the modified proposal. The City’s other reviewing departments, Public Works, Fire, and Recreation & Parks and any committees have not yet seen this proposal. Issues for discussion • Proposed Public Park Section 9 of the SBLDR states that “a range of parks should be distributed through the SEQ to meet a variety of needs including children’s play, passive enjoyment of the outdoors, and active recreation.” Furthermore, “parks should be provided at a rate of 7.5 acres of developed parkland per 1,000 population per the South Burlington Capital Budget and Program” and “a neighborhood or mini park of 10,000 square feet or more should be provided within a one-quarter mile walk of every home not so served by an existing City park or other publicly-owned recreation area.” The area set aside for the proposed public park is approximately 1.9 acres. This meets the minimum standard, of approximately 1 acre. The Board should consider the proposed park in the context of the overall PUD. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING Staff recommends the Board discuss the proposed new location of the park, as it has moved to the southwest corner of the property. A few notes for consideration: • How would the proposed park be accessed by pedestrians from the duplexes and triplexes within the PUD, and by residents outside of the PUD? The location appears to be more remote and difficult to access than previously. • How would privacy / future noise issues be addressed with the park directly adjacent to proposed and existing single family house lots? • What is the applicant’s understanding of ownership of the roadway leading to the park? A public park would need to be accessed by a public roadway. In this case, the roadway does not appear to meet City specifications for width or turn-around. Further, the length of the road exceeds the maximum cul-de-sac distance in the SEQ-NR District. The Board, under previous applications, had expressed concerns about public roadways crossing the wetland and exceeding the maximum cul-de-sac standard. 1. Staff understands that this level of review is not yet complete and these details should be largely worked out prior to any decision on the preliminary plat application. The applicant should engage in discussions with the Director of Public Works, Director of the Recreation Department and with the Recreation and Leisure Arts Committee and these should continue to as the application evolves. The Director and the applicant should address the location overall size of the park and which facilities shall be planned for the space (ie- basketball courts, play structures, etc), as well as parking needs. • Agriculture There are no community gardens depicted on the plan. The LDRs (Section 9.06)C) state: C. Agriculture. The conservation of existing agricultural production values is encouraged through development planning that supports agricultural uses (including but not limited to development plans that create contiguous areas of agricultural use), provides buffer areas between existing agricultural operations and new development, roads, and infrastructure, or creates new opportunities for agricultural use (on any soil group) such as but not limited to community-supported agriculture. Provisions that enhance overall neighborhood and natural resource values rather than preservation of specific soil types are strongly encouraged. 2. Given that there are 29 units in duplexes or triplexes and therefore limited yard space for these owners, a community garden or other agricultural elements – an orchard, fruit trees, etc - space is highly desirable and the applicant should explore locating such facilities convenient to these units. • Recreation Path and Block Lengths The City’s official map depicts the proposed route of the recreation path to connect from Vail Drive to Spear Street. Staff recognizes and appreciates the applicant now placing the recreation path along the eastern edge of the property in response to concerns previously expressed by staff and the Board. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING 3. Staff recommends that the applicant add a short path spur from the driveway area serving the triplex complex to the path. Staff notes that the proposed 750 ft. block length along single-family footprint lots, 1-13, is inconsistent with standards for the SEQ-Neighborhood Residential Subdistrict, stated as follows. 9.08 SEQ-NRT and SEQ-NR Sub-Districts; Specific Standards The SEQ-NR and SEQ-NRT sub-districts have additional dimensional and design requirements, as enumerated in this Section. A. Street, block and lot pattern. (1) Development blocks. Development block lengths should range between 300 and 500 linear feet. If it is unavoidable, blocks 500 feet or longer must include mid-block public sidewalk or recreation path connections. 4. Staff would recommend addition of a mid-block sidewalk connection near footprint lots 8 & 9. The applicant should address this. The standard above includes use of the word “must.” The Board should consider this standard, and address whether the proposed plan meets the regulation. Subsection 9.08(A) (2) (b) notes that “(d)ead end streets (e.g. culs-de-sac) are strongly discouraged. Dead end streets shall not exceed 200 feet in length.” The proposed road to access units 23 and 24 and the proposed park is approximately 510 feet long and is also a cul-de-sac. 5. See notes above regarding the park. If this current configuration of this road remains in place as the project moves towards preliminary and flat plat approval, staff recommends that the applicant work with the Director of Public Works and Fire Department to determine the needs for access and turn-around to these lots, as well as the details for the road construction. 14.06 General Review Standards ……………. B. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site. (1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. (2) Parking: (a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Any side of a building facing a public street shall be considered a front side of a building for the purposes of this subsection. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING (b) The Development Review Board may approve parking between a public street and one or more buildings if the Board finds that one or more of the following criteria are met. The Board shall approve only the minimum necessary to overcome the conditions below. (i) The parking area is necessary to meet minimum requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act; (ii) The parking area will serve a single or two-family home; (iii) The lot has unique site conditions, such as a utility easement or unstable soils, that allow for parking, but not a building, to be located adjacent to the public street; (iv) The lot contains one or more existing buildings that are to be re-used and parking needs cannot be accommodated to the rear and sides of the existing building(s); (v) The principal use of the lot is for public recreation; or (vi) The lot is located within the Mixed Industrial-Commercial Zoning District and meets the following criteria: Staff notes that the proposed triplexes in the project appear to have vehicle parking in the rear of the units with access via a private driveway. This is acceptable. 6. The applicant should clarify the parking and driveway plans for units 14 through 22. The proposed sidewalk along units 25-38 is impacted by driveways. This frontage is approximately 750 feet long. Assuming 14 driveways each with a 20 ft. width, 280 feet or 37.3% of this frontage will be interrupted by driveways. Similarly, the recreation path along units 46 through 52 is impacted by driveways. This frontage is approximately 330 feet long. Assuming 7 driveways each with a 20 ft. width, 1400 feet or 42.4% of this frontage will be interrupted by driveways. 7. Staff recommends the applicant explore the use of share driveway entrances for duplex units where possible the development to reduce sidewalk interruptions. Staff recommends that the applicant explore different building orientations for units 25 & 26 and units 37 & 38 such as facing the end units and their driveways towards the east-west side streets and/or having rear loaded garages accessed via those same side streets. 8. Staff also notes that the applicant will need to comply with Section 9.08, C.(4) which requires that “the front building line of the garage must be set behind the front building line of the house by a minimum of eight feet.” 9. Given that the length of Vale Drive exceeds the required block length, staff recommends that the applicant address this with a solution consistent with the regulations. • Parcel 1 The plans depict a building, lot 52, along the western edge of the parcel. As currently shown, the building is oriented to the proposed new street, as opposed to facing Spear Street. The proposed setback of the building approximates those of abutting properties on Spear Street. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING 10. Staff recommends that the Board discuss this issue with the applicant and provide guidance on the orientation of the building. • Density The base density of the parcel generated by the land at 1.2 units per acre, based on 26.15 acres, is 31 units. The maximum units allowed, in accordance with Chapter 9 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations and determined by the Neighborhood Residential sub-district under the Transferred Development Right program, are 103 units. The applicant is proposing to construct 52 new units, with one existing dwelling to be razed and one to remain, for a total of 53 units within the PUD. Lot 1 1 unit one, existing SF home to remain Units 24 & 25 2 units SF homes Units 1-13, 39-45 & 52 21 units SF home footprint lots Units 25-38 & 46-51 20 units 10 duplexes Units 14-22 9 units 3 triplexes This is a proposed density of approximately 2.03 units per acre. A total of 22 transferred development rights would be required. The applicant has stated that they have a legal option to purchase enough development rights to build the project as proposed. Staff has previously recommended that the Board require the applicant to submit the legal documents pertaining to the options for review by the City Attorney no later than prior to final plat approval. Staff has also recommended that the development rights be purchased by the applicant prior to issuance of zoning permits for any units beyond the 31 allowed by the property’s inherent density. 11. The Board did not previously raise issues with these recommendations regarding timing of transferred development rights. However, they should determine at this stage whether they shall be submitted prior to preliminary plat approval or prior to final plat approval. a. Staff recommends that the applicant submit legal documents pertaining to the options to purchase Transferred Development Rights (TDRs) to the City Attorney for approval, at a time determined by the Board. b. Staff recommends that the applicant submit all legal documents showing clear ownership and transfer of the development rights to the City Attorney for approval, prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the 32nd unit. • Roads and Circulation and Stormwater The Public Works Department provided detailed comments on the first proposed subdivision plans in mid-December 2014. The proposed revised plan submitted on March 9th differs substantially from that first version and does not provide sufficient detail on roads and stormwater for staff to accurately comment. • Phasing CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING The Board should discuss phasing for the following items: • Road completion; • Road connection to Vale Drive; • Timing for construction and completion of Park; • General phasing for the order of construction of buildings; • Improvements on Spear Street and at the Spear Street intersection; • Notice of Conditions There are “footprint” lots proposed around several of the units. For purposes of planning and zoning, all lots will be considered one lot. 12. For purposes of planning and zoning, the footprint lots in this subdivision shall be considered one (1) lot within each grouping. The applicant will be required to record a “Notice of Condition” to this effect which has been approved by the City Attorney prior to recording the final plat plans. • Mix of Housing Types 13. While most details will be addressed at preliminary and final plat, staff notes the applicant’s proposal may or may not be consistent with Section 9.08 C.(5) (1) Mix of Housing Styles. A mix of housing styles (i.e. ranch, cape cod, colonial, etc.), sizes, and affordability is encouraged within neighborhoods and developments. These should be mixed within blocks, along the street and within neighborhoods rather than compartmentalized into sections of near-identical units. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the applicant work with Staff and the Development Review Board to address the issues herein. There are several items which must still be addressed as part of a more detailed, engineered preliminary plat application. Staff notes that as the project evolves, additional questions not raised herein may be posed. Respectfully submitted, ________________________________ Paul Conner, Planning & Zoning Director LETTER TO DRB 3/11/15 RE SPEAR MEADOWS Spear Meadows development has been discussed in detail by the DRB, neighbors and developers for nearly 10 years. Many of the abutters of this project have resided here for 30 or more years, and chose their homesites when the zoning in that field allowed only one unit per 10 acres. It was with that info that I chose to purchase my lot in 1974, over several other options. The zoning was changed to a max of 1.2 units per acre 20 years ago, at which time the DRB was created to ensure that interests of developers and abutters alike were protected. When the Farrells initially proposed their development 10 years ago, the neighbors were confident that development would be limited to a max of 1.2 units per acre, since all the homes to the east and west of the field occupied two or more acres, and higher density would, we felt, be incompatible with the surrounding area. The plan for the full 31 units was approved, and the neighbors accepted this plan, since it was reasonably tasteful, didn’t infringe excessively on abutting homes, included a reasonably practical recreation path, and was aesthetically consistent with Pinnacle to the South. When the Farrells returned to the DRB with a new proposal to use TDR’s to expand the density, the neighbors were hopeful that the Board would exercise its discretion to disallow application of TDR’s to the site, as any effort to do so would result in density incompatible with the site itself as well as the surrounding area.. What followed have been a series of at least 6 hyperdense proposals that could only serve the interests of the developer. This site rests at the northwest corner of the southeast quadrant, and serves as its window from the north or west. Whenever I casually mention to visitors or friends that 50 or more units may be erected in that field (indeed, due to the wetland, most of the units would be along the easterly border, packed into an area of about 10 acres), they react with animated disbelief. Whatever is built in that field will serve as a major landmark for our City for the foreseeable future. I urge the DRB to ensure that it’s done properly. We are depending on the DRB to safeguard the interests of the neighbors and of the City. I respectfully suggest that the DRB limit the maximum density to 1.2 units per acre such that the Spear Meadows homesites are both appropriate to the site as well as more compatible with the surrounding area, and also to allow a proper park and recreation path. Thanks very much for your consideration, and for your continued hard work. Respectfully. Michael J. Scollins, 214 Meadowood Drive Cc: City Council . . On the subject ofTDR's, the Applicant failed to respond to Question 9b on the Sketch Plan Application form as to the location, including street address, from which the TDR's would be transferred. As such, the Neighbors Group submits that the DRB should await receipt of such information before proceeding further on the Application. (In that connection, the Applicant also The Applicant seeks DRB approval for as many as twenty-two TDR-based units of density in order to add to the property's allowable base density of thirty-one units, for a maximum of fifty-three units. The Neighbors Group continues to maintain that the TDR bylaw contained within the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (SBLDR) is unenforceable because it fails to comply with State law- specifically 24 V.S.A.§4423 - and because it is unconstitutionally void for vagueness under the standards set out in the Vermont Supreme Court case ofIn re Appeal of JAM Golf, LLC, 2008 VT 110, 185Vt. 201, 969 A.2d 47. I was not able to attend the January 20th DRB sketch meeting on the above-referenced matter, but I understand from my clients that the topic of Transferable Development Rights (TDR's) came up, and that the Neighbors Group offered to send the DRB a letter on the subject, as well as other matters related to the proposed project. I would be grateful if you would accept this letter as part of that submission and include it in the packet of materials for the DRB's March 17thmeeting. I serve as counsel in connection with the above-referenced matter for William Gilbert and Ms. Maurene Gilbert of 1400 Spear Street, Dr. Thomas Kleh and Ms. Louise Kleh of219 Meadowood Drive, Dr. Michael Scollins and Dr. Mary Scollins of 214 Meadowood Drive, Dr. Robert Skiff and Ms. Marley Skiff of 89 Springhouse Road, and the Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Association, all of whom are South Burlington residents as well as abutters and/or interested persons in the above-referenced matter (collectively, the "Neighbors Group"). Dear Chairman Barritt: Re: Snyder Homes Sketch Plan Application # SD -14-37 (S. Burl. Dev. Rev. Bd.) Mr. Tim Barritt, Chair South Burlington Development Review Board City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 VIA FIRST-CLASS MAIL March 11,2015 at BURA MELLONI cc: Mr. Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer (via e-mail) Mr. Paul Conner, Planning and Zoning Director (via e-mail) Ms. Cathyann LaRose, AICP, City Planner (via e-mail) Mr. William Gilbert and Ms. Maurene Gilbert (via e-mail) Dr. Thomas Kleh and Ms. Louise Kleh (via e-mail) Mr. Bryan Landerman, President, Pinnacle at Spear Homeowners Ass'n (via e-mail) Dr. Michael Scollins and Dr. Mary Scollins (via e-mail) Dr. Robert Skiff and Ms. Marley Skiff (via e-mail) Robert Rushford, Esq. (via e-mail) Daniel A. Seff Respectfully Submitted, ~Al On behalf of the Neighbors Group, thanks very much to the DRB members for their consideration and courtesies. Under these circumstances, the Neighbors Group suggests respectfully that the best course of action would be for the DRB to direct the Applicant to revise the project's design to a lower and more reasonable and realistic density (rather than trying to mold the requested permit to allow excess TDR-based density). A substantial portion of the Planning and Zoning Staff comments that the DRB reviewed during the January 20th sketch meeting would not exist or would be ameliorated substantially if the project's density were reduced. For example, block lengths, road crossings, traffic impact, interrupted sidewalks and safety issues, recreation path locations, adequacy of community garden space in the planned very dense central portion of the project, ingress, egress, turnaround space, garage and parking location. I understand that the DRB raised several other issues during the January 20th sketch meeting that require additional information and a further response from the Applicant. The Neighbors Group reserves comment on these matters and requests the opportunity to comment after the Applicant provides the DRB with additional information and/or a further response. failed to state any legal interest in the real estate that is the subject of the Application, as is required in response to Application Question 4.) I am advised that, during the January 20th sketch meeting, the DRB indicated that it might consider consulting with the City Attorney regarding the implementation and interpretation of the City's TDR bylaw. The Neighbors Group welcomes such an inquiry and I would request that the DRB allow the undersigned and Neighbors Group member and retired lawyer Mr. William A. Gilbert to participate in such a discussion with the City Attorney and/or the DRB. I note that the Applicant has requested to meet with various City officials as part of the Application's preparation and in response to the DRB's concerns. Therefore, I request respectfully that Mr. Gilbert and I be included as part of any similar review of the TDR issue. MELLONIPtc BURAK ANDERSON DRB Chair Tim Barritt March 11, 2015 Page 2of2 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Paul Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning SUBJECT: CU-15-01 56 Central Ave, Richard White DATE: March 17, 2015 Development Review Board meeting Enclosed, the Board’s request at the last meeting, are a series of “shadow” study results provided by the applicant. It’s our understanding that these are for Dec 21; the Board can confirm this at the meeting. The photos are organized as follows: Existing Conditions: • Sunrise • Noon • 1 pm • 2 pm • 3 pm • Sunset Proposed Conditions: • Sunrise • Noon • 1 pm • 2 pm • 3 pm • Sunset The applicant has also prepared a series of time-lapse videos for various dates of the year which can be shown at the meeting. LEVEL 1 0" LEVEL 2 8' - 10 1/4" BASEMENT -8' - 6" TOP of ROOF 23' - 4 1/8" WOOD SIDING TO MATCH EXISTING WOOD WINDOWS AND DOOR CABLEGUARDRAIL ASPHALT ROOF EXISTING HOUSE FINISHED SPACE ADDITION INSULATED OVERHEAD DOOR TOP of LOW ROOF 17' - 0 5/8"24' - 10 3/4"LEVEL 1 0" LEVEL 2 8' - 10 1/4" BASEMENT-8' - 6" TOP of ROOF 23' - 4 1/8" EXISTING HOUSE BEYOND ADDITION EAST ELEVATION TOP of LOW ROOF17' - 0 5/8"TO REAR GRADE26' - 4 1/2"TO FRONT GRADE17' - 10 1/2"LEVEL 1 0" LEVEL 2 8' - 10 1/4" TOP of ROOF 23' - 4 1/8" LINE OF WOOD SCREENIN FOREGROUND 6' - 0"WOOD SIDING TOMATCH EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLES CONCRETEFOUNDATION RELOCATED WOODSTAIR ADDITION NORTH ELEVATION TOP of LOW ROOF17' - 0 5/8" LEVEL 1 0" LEVEL 2 8' - 10 1/4" TOP of ROOF 23' - 4 1/8" WOOD SIDING TOMATCH EXISTING EXISTING DOOR RELOCATED EXISTING NEW TOP of LOW ROOF 17' - 0 5/8" SHEET NO: © 2014 HINGE, INC. The design ideas and plansrepresented by thesedocuments are the propertyof Hinge, Inc. Use or copy ispermitted by contract only.The use or revisions of theseideas and plans is prohibitedwithout the writtenpermission of Hinge. SCALE: DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PHASE: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR PERMIT SUBMITTAL ONLY3/5/2015 2:49:05 PM 1/8" = 1'-0" A200 ELEVATIONS 56 CENTRAL AVENUE, SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05401 MA MA 03/05/15RICHARD WHITE SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION LEVEL 10"LEVEL 28' - 10 1/4"BASEMENT-8' - 6"TOP of ROOF23' - 4 1/8"WOOD SIDING TO MATCH EXISTINGWOOD WINDOWS AND DOORCABLEGUARDRAILASPHALT ROOFEXISTING HOUSEFINISHED SPACEADDITIONINSULATED OVERHEAD DOORTOP of LOW ROOF17' - 0 5/8"24' - 10 3/4"LEVEL 10"LEVEL 28' - 10 1/4"BASEMENT-8' - 6"TOP of ROOF23' - 4 1/8"EXISTING HOUSE BEYONDADDITIONEAST ELEVATIONTOP of LOW ROOF17' - 0 5/8"TO REAR GRADE26' - 4 1/2"TO FRONT GRADE17' - 10 1/2"LEVEL 10"LEVEL 28' - 10 1/4"TOP of ROOF23' - 4 1/8"LINE OF WOOD SCREENIN FOREGROUND6' - 0"WOOD SIDING TOMATCH EXISTINGASPHALT SHINGLESCONCRETEFOUNDATIONRELOCATED WOODSTAIRADDITIONNORTH ELEVATIONTOP of LOW ROOF17' - 0 5/8"LEVEL 10"LEVEL 28' - 10 1/4"TOP of ROOF23' - 4 1/8"WOOD SIDING TOMATCH EXISTINGEXISTING DOOR RELOCATEDEXISTINGNEWTOP of LOW ROOF17' - 0 5/8"SHEET NO:© 2014 HINGE, INC.The design ideas and plansrepresented by thesedocuments are the propertyof Hinge, Inc. Use or copy ispermitted by contract only.The use or revisions of theseideas and plans is prohibitedwithout the writtenpermission of Hinge.SCALE:DATE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:PHASE:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONFOR PERMIT SUBMITTAL ONLY3/5/2015 2:49:05 PM 1/8" = 1'-0"A200ELEVATIONS56 CENTRAL AVENUE, SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05401MAMA03/05/15RICHARD WHITESOUTH ELEVATIONWEST ELEVATION CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD SP_15_05_82EthanAllenDrive_Cummings_building_and_um brella_approval DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING Report preparation date: March 13, 2015 Plans received: January 30, 2015 82 Ethan Allen Drive SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-15-05 Meeting date: March 17, 2015 Owner/Applicant Glenn Cummings 80 Ethan Allen Drive South Burlington, VT 05407 Property Information Tax Parcel 0640-00082 Mixed Industrial & Commercial Zoning District CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING PROJECT DESCRIPTION Site plan application #SP-15-05 of Glenn Cummings to construct a 10,500 sq. ft. mixed use commercial/industrial building to include an umbrella approval, 82 Ethan Allen Drive. COMMENTS Director of Planning & Zoning Paul Conner and Planner Temporary Assignment Dan Albrecht, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on January 30, 2015 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements: Industrial-Commercial Zoning District Required Proposed √ Min. Lot Size 40,000 S.F. 41,370 S.F √ Max. Building Coverage 40% 25.3 % √ Max. Overall Coverage 70% 57.7 % √ Max. Front Yard Coverage 30% 20.2 % √ Min. Front Setback 30 ft 32 ft. √ Min. Side Setback 10 ft. 15 ft. √ Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. 78 ft. √ Max. Building Height 40 ft. ~24 ft. √ Zoning Compliance Site Plan Review Standards A. Relationship of Proposed Development to the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Due attention by the applicant should be given to the goals and objectives and the stated land use policies for the City of South Burlington as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff considers the proposed building and uses to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. B. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site. (1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan detailing new plantings along the front of the lot, along the south side of the building to screen HVAC equipment and along the sides of the rear parking lot. In an email staff dated February 23, 2015, the City Arborist provided the following comments: Fill entire parking lot island with quality planting soil to provide maximum soil volume to support tree growth. Plan looks good otherwise 1. The Board should direct the applicant to comply with the City Arborist’s recommendations. There is an existing street sidewalk along the front of the lot. Staff recommends construction of a simple entry sidewalk path so that pedestrians can safely access the building from the street. As CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING currently shown, parking spaces abut the western edge of the building which serves as the primary point of entry to the five individual units of the building. Staff recommends that pedestrian movement and safety be improved through the use of striping, vehicle parking “stop blocks” and/or bollards. 2. The Board and the applicant should discuss whether the proposed project allows for safe pedestrian movement. 2) Parking: (a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Any side of a building facing a public street shall be considered a front side of a building for the purposes of this subsection. Parking is located to the side and rear of the building. A total of 18 parking spaces including one (1) handicapped space and a bike rack are available for the future uses. Staff considers this criterion to be met. (b) ………… (c) ………… (d) ………… (3) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or anticipated adjoining buildings. The proposed building is 24 feet high and compatible with this site which currently does not have any buildings. Staff considers this criterion to be met. (4) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansion shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. The plans indicate that such services are located underground. Staff considers this criterion to be met. C. Relationship of Structures and Site to Adjoining Area. (1) The Development Review Board shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics (e.g., rhythm, color, texture, form or detailing), landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. Only one building is proposed for the site. As noted above, the applicant has submitted a landscaping plan which the City Arborist found acceptable with the exception of a minor detail. Staff considers this criterion to be met. (2) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The proposed building is consistent with the surrounding landscape and with others in the vicinity. Staff considers this criterion to be met. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING 14.07 Specific Review Standards A. Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. No reservation of land is required. B. Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire-served utility lines and service connections shall be underground insofar as feasible and subject to state public utilities regulations. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. The plans indicate that such services are located underground. Staff considers this criterion to be met. C. Disposal of Wastes. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). Small receptacles intended for use by households or the public (ie, non-dumpster, non-large drum) shall not be required to be fenced or screened. The plans show a dumpster pad and enclosure at the rear of the parking lot. Staff considers this criterion to be met. D. Landscaping and Screening Requirements. See Article 13, Section 13.06 Landscaping, Screening, and Street Trees. The applicant has submitted a landscape plan detailing new plantings along the front of the lot, along the south side of the building to screen HVAC equipment and along the sides of the rear parking lot. A variety of plantings are proposed. The placement of landscaping and/or screening along the western edge of the property is precluded by a pre-existing Right-of-Way granted to access the lot located to the northwest of the property. As the project contains less than 28 spaces, no interior islands are required. No curbing appears to be proposed. It is unclear if the partial island at the northwest corner of the building is proposed to be curbed. This is acceptable for the northwestern edge of the parking lot as the stormwater and grading plan indicates sheet flow into an infiltration basin. However, the plantings along the northeast corner lack such protection. 3. The Board should direct the applicant to install curbing and/or other features to protect the landscaping. No snow storage areas are shown. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING 4. The Board should direct the applicant to revise the plans to indicate the location of snow storage areas and these areas be sited so as to minimize the potential for erosion and contaminated runoff into any adjacent or nearby surface waters. Building construction cost is estimated at $350,000. Required minimum landscaping is calculated as follows: First $250,000 x 3% = $7,500 100,000 x 2% = $2,000 Balance over $500,000 x 1% = -$0- Minimum required landscaping budget = $9,500. The applicant has proposed $17,505 in landscaping. The landscaping budget requirement is met. E. Modification of Standards. Where the limitations of a site may cause unusual hardship in complying with any of the standards above and waiver therefrom will not endanger the public health, safety or welfare, the Development Review Board may modify such standards as long as the general objectives of Article 14 and the City's Comprehensive Plan are met. However, with the exception of side yard setbacks in the Central District 1, in no case shall the DRB permit the location of a new structure less than five (5) feet from any property boundary and in no case shall be the DRB allow land development creating a total site coverage exceeding the allowable limit for the applicable zoning district in the case of new development, or increasing the coverage on sites where the pre-existing condition exceeds the applicable limit. No waivers are required. STORMWATER In an email to staff dated February 26, 2015, the Department of Public Works provided the following comments to staff From: Tom Dipietro <tdipietro@sburl.com> Date: February 26, 2015 at 4:12:15 PM EST To: Justin Rabidoux <jrabidoux@sburl.com> Subject: Comments on Glenn Cummings 82 Ethan Allen Drive Project I reviewed the “Glenn Cummings 82 Ethan Allen Drive” site plan prepared by Champlain Consulting Engineers, dated 1/23/15 with no revisions. I would like to offer the following comments: 1. The project proposes to create additional impervious area on the parcel. The applicant should determine if this project requires coverage under a new or existing (i.e. 3870-9010) State stormwater permit. If required, the applicant should acquire coverage under this permit before starting construction. 2. If the project disturbs greater than 1 acre of area it will require a construction stormwater permit from the Vermont DEC Stormwater Division. If required, the applicant should acquire this permit before starting construction. 3. I would like to provide the following comments related to the proposed infiltration basins: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING a. The applicant should provide a drainage area map for the proposed infiltration basins. i. The proposed infiltration basin at the south end of the property does not appear to collect a large area. Consider updating the plans so that additional stormwater runoff is directed to this basin for infiltration. b. The applicant should provide hydrologic modeling information related to the stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure. i. If the project is not subject to State stormwater regulations due to State permitting requirements, we’d like to see these systems designed to treat/infiltrate the 1 year rain event and safely pass larger events. ii. The applicant should keep in mind that systems designed to meet State stormwater treatment standards are eligible for credit under the City stormwater utility billing program. c. Provide information on any soil tests completed to confirm the adequacy of these soils for infiltration. d. A large area appears to drain to the relatively small (~15’x~40’) infiltration basin at the north end of the property. Confirm that this basin can accommodate flows during larger storm events. e. Consider redesigning the 12” SDR pipe to the east of the proposed building so that it could infiltrate additional water. Could this be reconfigured as an infiltration trench? 4. Plans indicate that the roof will be guttered. Consider options to infiltrate runoff from this 10,500 s.f. area. For example, the east side of the building may provide opportunity to install an infiltration trench. 5. The applicant should show snow storage locations on the site plan. 6. The applicant should update the EPSC Plan to show a stabilized construction entrance at the south end of the site, where access to Ethan Allen Drive is proposed. 7. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to regularly maintain all stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. -Tom Thomas J. DiPietro Jr. Deputy Director CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING Department of Public Works 5. The Board should direct the applicant to comply with the recommendations of the Department of Public Works. Other- Umbrella Permit Based upon a March 11, 2015 phone conversation of staff with the applicant, the applicant is now seeking an umbrella approval for a shorter list of possible uses than that initially proposed with the submission of the application. The applicant is seeking an umbrella approval for the following uses: 1. Auto & motorcycle service & repair 2. Contractor or building trade facility 3. Distribution and related storage, with >15% of GFA in office or other principal permitted use by same tenant 4. Equipment service, repair & rental 5. Indoor Vehicle Storage, max 10,000 SF (acc) 6. Light Manufacturing 7. Manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials & components 8. Office, general 9. Wholesale establishments 10. Warehousing, processing, storage & distribution Staff finds no issues with the approval of these uses as of right on the subject property. Trip Generation Based upon proposed construction of a 10,500 SF of a General Light Industrial building (ITE LUC #110), the weekday PM Peak Hour average vehicle trip ends is calculated as follows: 0.97 (trip generation per 1,000 SF g.f.a.) x 10.5 = estimated number of vehicle trip ends generated by current uses is 10.19. The applicant may also choose at this time to pay for only the trip ends of the least intensive use, in this case, “warehousing, processing, storage & distribution.” Based upon proposed construction of a 10,500 SF of a Warehouse building (ITE LUC #150), the weekday PM Peak Hour average vehicle trip ends is calculated as follows: 0.32 (trip generation per 1,000 SF g.f.a.) x 10.5 = estimated number of vehicle trip ends generated by current uses is 3.36. The applicant should determine how many peak hour vehicle trip ends will cover the requirements of possible future uses approved under the umbrella approval. If not, the applicant should request additional trip ends. Traffic will not necessitate modifications to the roadway as a result of this application. Parking and Trip Generation will be calculated for each individual unit as they are proposed for use by the owner. The applicant shall obtain approval from the Administrative Officer prior to the establishment of a new tenant in the building or change in tenant. The Administrative Officer shall approve the proposed tenant only if the proposed combination of uses fits within the uses noted above, that the calculated trip ends have previously been paid for or will be paid for and that parking requirements shall be met. In making his determination, the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING Administrative Officer shall utilize the parking standards contained in Tables 13-1 – 13.6 of the Land Development Regulations and the weekday PM Peak Hour average vehicle trip ends per 1,000 sq. ft. gross floor area as determined by the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 9th edition The applicant shall be responsible for obtaining approval and paying traffic impact fees for additional traffic which may result from a change of use. Any changes proposed to category of use and resulting traffic shall be reviewed under the umbrella permit, and limited to the maximums set herein. Parking A total of 18 parking spaces including one (1) handicapped space and a bike rack are available for the future uses. Respectfully submitted, ______________________________ Paul Conner, Planning & Zoning Director Copy to: Glenn Cummings, applicant 7-RHUaro'GL'5-ILEvert'WR'3-ILEvert'WR'10-CORsto'AF'4-CLEaln'RS'3-ILEver'SG'12-MICdec- (4 FoC)2-CLEaln'RS'2-CLEaln'RS'2-CLEaln'RS'2-CLEaln'RS'1-GLEtri'Sha'3-BETnig'Her'Planting ScheduleIDQtyLatin NameCommon NameScheduled SizeTreesBETnig'Her'3Betula nigra 'Heritage' (Multi-stem)Heritage River Birch 12-14' GLEtri'Sha'1Gleditsia triacanthos inermis 'Shademaster'Shademaster Honeylocust3.5-4"ShrubsCLEaln'RS'12Clethra alnifolia 'Ruby Spice'Ruby Spice Summersweet#7CORsto'AF'10Cornus stolonifera 'Arctic Fire'Arctic Fire Dogwood#3ILEver'SG'3Ilex verticillata 'Southern Gentleman'Southern Gentleman Winterberry#3ILEvert'WR'8Ilex verticillata 'Winter Red'Winter Red Winterberry#3MICdec12Microbiota decussataSiberian Cypress#3RHUaro'GL'7Rhus aromatica 'Gro-Low'Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac#322 Pearl StreetEssex Jct, VT 05453(802) 857-5104Designed by: David Burton, VCHVermont Certified Horticulturistwww.GinkgoDesignVT.vcomEDGE OF PAVEMENTEDGE OF BEDSPACING SEE PLAN18" MIN.SPREAD18" MIN.NOTES1.PROVIDE MULCHED CIRCULAR SAUCER FOR INDIVIDUAL PLANTS.2.PROVIDE FIRM WELL PROPORTIONED ROOTBALLS. CRACKED OR MUSHROOMED ROOTBALLS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.INSTALL 2-3" OF MULCHKEEP MULCH AWAY FROM TRUNKFINISH GRADEPLANTING HOLE SHALL BE APPROX.TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOTBALLWHEN APPLICABLE. REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP INCLUDING TWINE OF BALLED AND BURLAP PLANTS. REMOVE COMPLETE CONTAINER OR PEAT POT FOR CONTAINER BROWN OR POTTED PLANTS. SCARIFY PERIMETER ROOTS OF CONTAINER ROOT BOUND PLANTS.SHRUB PLANTING DETAILSCALE: NONE2THE LENGTH OF HOSE USED MUST BE LARGER THAN THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF THE TREE TRUNK. BALL DIAMETER TO COMPLY WITH MIN. GUIDELINES AS SET FORTH BY THE AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK LATEST EDITIONNOTES1.PROVIDE MULCHED CIRCULAR SAUCER FOR INDIVIDUAL PLANTS.2.PROVIDE FIRM WELL PROPORTIONED ROOTBALLS. CRACKED OR MUSHROOMED ROOTBALLS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.3.THE 1ST ORDER LATERAL ROOTS ARE TO BE PARTIALLY EXPOSED PRIOR TO DIGGING TO ESTABLISH DEPTH OF HOLE WHICH SHOULD NOT BE DEEPER THAN ROOTBALL. NEVER CUT MAIN LEADERRUBBER HOSEGUY WIREREMOVE TOP 50% OFBURLAP & TWINE ANDWIRE CAGE2-3" OF MULCH FORMED INCIRCULAR SAUCER. KEEPMULCH AWAY FROM TRUNKFINISH GRADETURNBUCKLE W/ 4" MIN TAKEUPPVC SAFETY SLEEVE 1/2" DIA., 3'-0" LENGHT MIN.NOTCH OR DRILL 1/4" HOLE THRU STAKE 2" FROM TOP TO CONNECT GUY WIRESCARIFY 4" DEEP AND RECOMPACTWOOD STAKES (3) AT 120 DEGREE SPACINGPLANTING HOLE SHALL BE APPROX. TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THE ROOTBALL. BACK FILL WITH EXISTING SOIL WHEN AVAILABLEDRIVE STAKE 24" INTO SOILDECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAILSCALE: NONE1BALL DIAMETER TO COMPLY WITH MIN. GUIDELINES AS SET FORTH BY THE AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK LATEST EDITIONSCARIFY 4" DEEPAND RECOMPACT3"NOTES1.PROVIDE MULCHED CIRCULAR SAUCER FOR INDIVIDUAL PLANTS.2.PROVIDE FIRM WELL PROPORTIONED ROOTBALLS. CRACKED OR MUSHROOMED ROOTBALLS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.3.THE 1ST ORDER LATERAL ROOTS ARE TO BE PARTIALLY EXPOSED PRIOR TO DIGGING TO ESTABLISH DEPTH OF HOLE WHICH SHOULD NOT BE DEEPER THAN ROOTBALL. RUBBER HOSE & 12 GA. WIRE OR CHAIN LOCK ADJUSTABLE PVC STAKE STRAP2"x2" WOOD STAKEREMOVE TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP & TWINEPLANTING HOLE SHALL BE APPROX.TWICE THE DIAMETER OF THEROOTBALL. BACK FILL WITH EXISTINGSOIL WHEN AVAILABLEDRIVE STAKE 18" BEYOND TREE PIT2-3" OF MULCH FORMED IN CIRCULAR SAUCERKEEP MULCH AWAY FROM TRUNK FINISH GRADEFIRM WELL PROPORTIONED BALL. CRACKED OR MUSHROOMED BALLS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.BALL DIAMETER TO COMPLY WITH MIN. GUIDELINES AS SET FORTH BY THE AMERICAN STANDARDS FOR NURSERY STOCK LATEST EDITIONMULTI-STEM TREE PLANTING DETAILSCALE: NONE4 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Paul Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning SUBJECT: SD-15-02 5 Dorset Street Halvorsen Development DATE: March 17, 2015 Development Review Board meeting The applicant, Halvorsen Development and the landowner, Larkin Family Partnership, have requested that the final plat application be reopened to consider two minor changes in the plan: a lease line modification and the relocation of the Pergola north to be located within the lease line limits for this development. Details are provided in the applicant’ letter and revised set of plans both dated March 9, 2015 Staff feels that proposed changes have no significant impact on the plans previously reviewed by the Board and will clear up a potential inconsistency between the location of lease lines and the physical location of the various structures on the property. Recommendation: The Board should review the information provided by the applicant and should close the final plat plan application once it is satisfied. No other outstanding items remain. Owner/ApplicantEngineer:TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE)478 BLAIR PARK ROADWILLISTON, VT 05495(802) 879-6331HALVORSEN DEVELOPMENT1877 SO. FEDERAL HIGHWAY SUITE 200BOCA RATON, FLA. 33432(561) 367-9200PROJECT DESCRIPTION:DEMOLITION OF AN EXISTING BUILDING AND REDEVELOPMENT OFSITE WITH A 11242± S.F. PHARMACY RETAIL BUILDING, NEW PARKING,WATER, SEWER AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE.FINAL PLAT SUBMISSION SET(NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION)478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COMTRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSTCE PROJECT NO: 14-091LAST REVISED:USE AND INTERPRETATION OF THE DRAWINGS1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended for preliminary planning, coordination with otherdisciplines or utilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities.¬ They are not intended as constructiondrawings unless noted as such.2. Only drawings specifically marked “For Construction” are intended to be used in conjunction with contractdocuments, specifications, owner/contractor agreements and to be fully coordinated with other disciplines,including but not limited to, the Architect, if applicable.¬ These Drawings shall not be used for construction layout.Contact TCE for any construction surveying services or to obtain electronic data suitable for construction layout.3. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are not transferable. As instruments of service, these drawings,and copies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property.¬ Changes to the drawings may only be made byTCE. If errors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought to the attention of TCE immediately.4. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project, the Owner represents that they have reviewed,approved, and accepted the drawings and have met with all applicable parties/disciplines to insure these plansare properly coordinated with other aspects of the Project.¬ The Owner and Architect, are responsible for anybuildings shown, including an area measured five (5) feet around any building.¬5. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains the most current revisions.BEFORE USING THESE PLANS ENSURE THAT YOU HAVE THE LATEST REVISIONHalvorsen DevelopmentOne Dorset StreetSouth Burlington, VTDRAWING INDEXC1-00 LEGEND AND NOTESC1-01 EXISTING CONDITIONSC1-02 DEMOLITION PLANC2-01 OVERALL SITE PLANC2-02 SITE PLANC5-01 EPSC PLANL1-01 LANDSCAPING PLANC8-01 SITE DETAILSC8-02 SITE DETAILSC8-03 SEWER & WATER DETAILSC8-04 WATER DETAILSC8-05 STORMWATER DETAILSC8-06 EPSC DETAILSALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEYALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEYSHT 1-2SHT 2-21471241 LIGHTNG PLANA-4.1EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS03/04/2015No. 8104CIVILJOHN P. PITROWISKISTATE OF VERMO NT PRO FESSIONAL ENGINEERLICENSED 12-052¬HalvorsenDevelopmentOne Dorset StreetSouth Burlington, VTLegend and NotesC1-0008/22/14N/A14-091NPCSMM¬¬APPLICANT:HALVORSEN DEVELOPMENT1877 SO. FEDERAL HIGHWAY SUITE 200BOCA RATON, FLA. 33432(561) 367-9200CIVIL ENGINEER:TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE)478 BLAIR PARK ROADWILLISTON, VT 05495PHONE: (802)879-6331LEGENDLINESYMBOLRECORD DRAWING REQUIREMENTS:1) A CLEAN SET OF UP TO DATE RECORD DRAWINGS IS TO BE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. FOR JOBS LASTING MORE THAN 4 WEEKS A REVIEW OF THE RECORDDRAWINGS WILL BE DONE BY THE ENGINEER EVERY 2 WEEKS AND COMMENTS OR DEFICIENCIES MAY BE PROVIDED.2) TIES TO ALL BENDS, VALVES, JOINTS, CONNECTIONS AND DESIGN FEATURES SHALL BE PROVIDED. TIES SHALL BE PULLED FROM EASILY LOCATABLE PERMANENT ABOVEGROUND FEATURES THAT ARE VISIBLE YEAR AROUND SUCH AS BUILDING CORNERS, HYDRANTS, SEWER AND STORM DRAIN COVERS THAT WILL BE CLEARED IN WINTER, UTILITYPOLES, ETC. REFRAIN FROM PROVIDING TIES WITH ACUTE ANGLES. TIES SHOULD BE PULLED AT ANGLES AS CLOSE TO 90 DEGREES AS POSSIBLE. TIES WITH ANGLE TOO ACUTEMAY BE REJECTED.3) RECORD INFORMATION NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED ON THE APPROPRIATE DESIGN PLANS ON A WEEKLY BASIS. RECORD INFORMATION REGARDING TCE DESIGN ITEMS PLACEDON INAPPROPRIATE DESIGN PLANS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.4) IF ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR BI-WEEKLY REVIEW OF RECORD INFORMATION HAVE NOT BEEN OBTAINED FOR THE PROJECT ALL RECORD INFORMATION FOR TCE DESIGNITEMS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO TCE WITHIN 7 BUSINESS DAYS OF THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK.5) PLANS SUBMITTED AT THE END OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE REVIEWED FOR COMPLETENESS. ALL REQUIREMENTS LISTED ABOVE APPLY.6) IF DESIGN FEATURES WERE INSTALLED EXACTLY PER THE DESIGN PLANS TIES TO THE FEATURE ARE STILL REQUIRED TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE OWNERS USE.ANY FEATURE NOT INDICATED AS DIFFERENT IN RED WILL BE CONSIDERED TO BE EXACTLY PER DESIGN.7) RECORD INFORMATION SHALL INCLUDE BOTH VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL LOCATIONS. THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS, RIMS ANDINVERTS OF STRUCTURES AND PIPING, INVERTS AT CROSSINGS, ETC8) ANY UTILITIES ENCOUNTERED THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE ADDED TO THE PLANS WITH APPROPRIATE TIES.9) TIES SHALL INCLUDE ALL UTILITIES INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR WHICH INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO SEWER, WATER, STORM, ELECTRIC, CABLE, TELEPHONE, GAS, ETC.10) RECORD DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUPPLIED ON BOTH HARD COPY AND ELECTRONIC DATA. ELECTRONIC DATA SHALL BE COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN (CAD) FILES INCLUDINGNATIVE FILE FORMATS (DWG).11) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT ON A WEEKLY BASIS PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS. THE INFORMATION WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT WITH EACHPICTURE BEING LABELED BY DATE, LOCATION AND ACTIVITY. AT A MINIMUM THE CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT PICTURES OF ALL THRUST BLOCKS, CONNECTIONS TO EXISTINGFACILITIES AND STRUCTURES BEFORE AND AFTER BACKFILL. PROVIDE AUXILIARY LIGHTING AS REQUIRED TO PRODUCE CLEAR, WELL-LIT PHOTOGRAPHS WITHOUT OBSCURINGSHADOWS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ONE CHECK SET OF PHOTOGRAPHS AT THE SITE FOR REFERENCE. UPON REQUEST THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDEPICTURES OF VARIOUS AREAS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE ENGINEER OR OWNER.12) CERTIFICATIONS BY THE ENGINEER AND SUCCESSFUL TEST RESULTS DO NOT RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS ANDPERMITS SHOULD A DEFICIENCY BE DISCOVERED AFTER SAID CERTIFICATION OR TESTING.PROJECT AREAPHASE LIMITSOIL STOCK PILEBARRIER TAPESILT FENCESTABILIZED CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCESTONE CHECK DAMFIBER ROLLEPSC LEGENDINLET PROTECTIONSEDIMENT TRAPLEGEND NOTE:SOME INFORMATION MAY BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS AND COULD BE SHOWN WITH A DIFFERENT SYMBOL NOT SHOWN ON THIS LEGEND. HOWEVER, THEYARE LABELED ON RESPECTIVE PLANS. IN SOME CASES A CHANGE IN SCALE OR PRINTER CAN ALTER INFORMATION TO NOT SHOW AN EXACT MATCH ONTHIS LEGEND. IF ANY QUESTIONS EXIST CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO CLARIFY. ADDITIONAL LEGEND INFORMATION IS SUPPLIED SEPARATELY ON EROSIONCONTROL PLANS AND SOME SURVEY PLATS.CONSTRUCTION PHASE:LISTED BELOW IS A BRIEF SUMMARY OF CONSTRUCTION PHASE REQUIREMENTS. THIS LIST IS NOT INTENDED TO BE ALL-INCLUSIVE. CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS, PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND SUBSEQUENTCONTRACTUAL AGREEMENTS FROM PARTIES INVOLVED SHALL PREVAIL.PRE-CONSTRUCTIONxOWNER TO ESTABLISH SCOPE OF SERVICES WITH PROJECT ENGINEER(S)xOWNER TO IDENTIFY WORK SCOPE AND SCHEDULExUPON OWNER REQUEST, ASSIST WITH CONTRACTOR BID AND SELECTION PROCESSxFINALIZE PLANS FOR CONSTRUCTION READINESS INCLUDING SPECIFICATIONSxMEETING BETWEEN OWNER, ENGINEER(S), CONTRACTOR(S), ARCHITECT(S), REGULATORY AUTHORITIES AND OTHER PERTINENT PARTIES TO REVIEW AND DISCUSS THE WORKPRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETINGxCONTRACTOR TO IDENTIFY SUBCONTRACTORSxCONTRACTOR TO ESTABLISH SCHEDULExCONTRACTOR TO DESIGNATE RESPONSIBLE PERSONNELxCONFIRM PROCEDURE FOR RFI'S, CHANGE ORDERS, EXTRAS AND PAY REQUESTSxCONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGSxCONTRACTOR TO OUTLINE SAFETY, SECURITY, AND WORKING HOURSxCONTRACTOR OR OWNER TO IDENTIFY TESTING COMPANYCONSTRUCTION PHASExINITIAL CONTROL SUPPLIED BY OWNER AND CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR LAYOUTxOWNER TO PROVIDE PROJECT ENGINEER TO OBSERVE CONSTRUCTION PERIODICALLY, DURING CRITICAL PHASES AND TESTING.xWEEKLY JOB MEETINGS DURING CONSTRUCTIONxOWNER TO PROVIDE PROJECT ENGINEER TO REVIEW AND DISCUSS PLANS, ANSWER QUESTIONS, RESPOND TO CHANGES AND OTHER BUSINESS COMMON TO CONSTRUCTION SERVICES.xOBSERVE TESTING AND COLLECT RESULTSxOWNER AND CONTRACTOR TO COMPLY WITH PERMITSSheet TitleProject TitleUse of These Drawings1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended forpreliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines orutilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities.¬They are not intended as construction drawings unless notedas such.2. Only drawings specifically marked “For Construction” areintended to be used in conjunction with contractdocuments, specifications, owner/contractor agreementsand to be fully coordinated with other disciplines, includingbut not limited to, the Architect, if applicable.¬ TheseDrawings shall not be used for construction layout. ContactTCE for any construction surveying services or to obtainelectronic data suitable for construction layout.3. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are nottransferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, andcopies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property.¬Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. Iferrors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought tothe attention of TCE immediately.4. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project,the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved,and accepted the drawings and have met with allapplicable parties/disciplines to insure these plans areproperly coordinated with other aspects of the Project.¬ TheOwner and Architect, are responsible for any buildingsshown, including an area measured a minimum five (5) feetaround any building.¬5. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains themost current revisions.Project Reference:Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Project Engineer:Approved By:No. Description Date ByRevisions478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COMTRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSNo. 8104CIVILJOHN P. PITROW IS KISTATE OF VERMO N T PRO FESSIONALENGINEERLICENSEDField Book:GENERAL NOTES:1. CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST ANY POTABLE WATER LINE CROSSINGS AND CONSULT WITH ENGINEER TO MEET REQUIREMENTS SHOWN ON THE DETAIL SHEET "WATER/SEWER CROSSING"DETAIL.2. SEWER LATERAL CONNECTIONS ARE SHOWN FOR CLARITY. CONTRACTOR TO CONSULT WITH ENGINEER AND SUPPLY BENDS, CLEANOUTS, ETC. AS NECESSARY TO FACILITATE PROPERCONNECTION BETWEEN FOUNDATION WALL AND SEWER MAIN LINE.3. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION WITH ALL RELEVANT PARTIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO OWNER, ARCHITECT AND UTILITY COMPANIES) TO DETERMINE FINALLAYOUT AND DESIGN.4. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF PEDESTRIAN WALKS, RAMPS AND DECKS BETWEEN BUILDINGS AND PARKING LOTS IS PROVIDED BY THE ARCHITECT AND INCORPORATED INTO THEBUILDING DESIGN.5. ALL CURB STOP VALVES TO BE INSTALLED WITH ACCESS COVER AT FINISHED GRADE.6. ALL WATER LINE TAPS SHALL BE LIVE TAPS; EXISTING WATER LINE MUST REMAIN IN SERVICE DURING CONNECTION, UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE.7. ROOF DOWNSPOUT CAN CONNECT TO ROOF DRAIN MANIFOLD (RD) AS DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT AND OWNER. THIS CONNECTION PIPE IS INCLUDED AS PART OF THE DESIGN PLANBUT NOT SHOWN TO ALLOW FLEXIBILITY IN LOCATION AS NEEDED.8. THRUST BLOCKS FOR PRESSURE LINES NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. PROVIDE THRUST BLOCKS AT ALL BENDS, TEE AND REDUCES. PROJECT ENGINEER TO OBSERVE ALL THRUST BLOCKS PRIORTO BACKFILL.9. WATER MAIN OPERATED AT HIGH PRESSURE. ALL BUILDINGS SHALL CONFIRM STATIC INTAKE PRESSURE AND PROVIDE PRESSURE-REDUCING VALVES AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THEMECHANICAL ENGINEER (OR ARCHITECT)10. CONTRACTOR TO SUPPLY DAYLIGHT PIPING FOR FOOTING DRAINS WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. THE EXACT LOCATION IS NOT CRITICAL.11. FOOTING DRAINS AROUND BUILDING MAY BE SHOWN BY OTHERS (BECAUSE IT IS WITHIN THE 5' ZONE AROUND BUILDING.) FOOTING DRAINS AND PIPE TO DAYLIGHT SHALL BE INCLUDEDEVEN IF NOT SHOWN. DAYLIGHT PIPE LOCATION TO SWALE IS NOT CRITICAL SO LONG AS IT DOES NOT CREATE ANY CONFLICT WITH OTHER UTILITIES, OR IMPACT ENVIRONMENTALLYSENSITIVE AREAS SUCH AS WETLANDS..12. SEWER CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING MANHOLES SHALL INCLUDE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS, REFORMING INVERT TO PROVIDE SMOOTH FLOW STREAM AND TESTING TO ENSURESTRUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT. IF AN EXISTING MANHOLE IS FOUND NOT TO BE WATERTIGHT IT SHALL BE EXPOSED AND REPAIRED ON THE OUTSIDE. PRIOR TO CONNECTING TO EXISTINGMANHOLES, SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS ON CORE LOCATION, ANY REQUIRED PIPING (FOR DROP MANHOLES) AND CHANGES TO INVERT FORM.13. FINAL RIMS OF SEWER MANHOLES AND WATER VALVES SHALL BE CONFIRMED AND COORDINATED WITH FINAL SITE GRADING. MINOR ADJUSTMENTS FROM DESIGN GRADES MAY BEREQUIRED BY OWNER OR ENGINEER AND SHALL BE INCLUDED.14. ROCK REMOVAL WORK FOR BOULDERS UNDER 2.5 CUBIC YARDS IS INCLUDED AS PART OF EXCAVATION. ANY ROCK REMOVAL FOR 2.5 CUBIC YARDS OR GREATER SHALL BE TREATEDAS LEDGE REMOVAL.15. THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO THE STRICTEST INTERPRETATION OF THE CONTRACT DRAWING, SPECIFICATION, PERMITS AND CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT .ALL EARTH MATERIAL RECEIVED OR DISPOSED FROM OUTSIDE SOURCES SHALL COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE PERMITS AND REGULATIONS. SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTALS SHALL INCLUDECONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND COPIES OF RELEVANT PERMITS FOR OUTSIDE SOURCES.16. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY FOR ALL REQUIRED TESTING. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO: SOIL TESTING, COMPACTION TESTING, SIEVE ANALYSIS, CONCRETE TESTING, ASPHALTPENETRATION TESTING, BACTERIOLOGICAL TESTING FOR WATER AND OTHER TESTING AS PART OF STANDARD PRACTICE FOR A CONSTRUCTION PROJECT OF THIS NATURE, UNLESSINDICATED OTHERWISE AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER.CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR CONTRACTOR & CLIENT/OWNER:1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS:THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED BY TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) AND ARE INTENDED TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE STANDARD GENERALCONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, #C-700 PREPARED BY THE ENGINEERS JOINT CONTRACT DOCUMENTS COMMITTEE (EJCDC), LATEST EDITION. COPIES ARE AVAILABLEAT WWW.NSPE.ORG/EJCDC2. UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS: THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED BASED ON RESEARCH, UTILITY PLANS PROVIDED BYOTHERS, AND/OR SURFACE EVIDENCE AVAILABLE AND WERE OBTAINED IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE ORDINARY STANDARD OF PROFESSIONAL CARE AND HAVE NOT BEENINDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE DESIGN ENGINEER.3. DIFFERING SUBSURFACE OR PHYSICAL CONDITIONS: IF CONTRACTOR BELIEVES THAT ANY SUBSURFACE OR PHYSICAL CONDITION AT OR CONTIGUOUS TO THE SITE THAT IS UNCOVEREDOR REVEALED EITHER: (1) IS OF SUCH A NATURE AS TO ESTABLISH THAT ANY “TECHNICAL DATA” ON WHICH CONTRACTOR RELIED IS MATERIALLY INACCURATE; OR (2) IS OF SUCH ANATURE AS TO REQUIRE A CHANGE IN THE PLANS/ CONTRACT DOCUMENTS; OR (3) DIFFERS MATERIALLY FROM THAT SHOWN OR INDICATED IN THE PLANS/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS; OR(4) IS OF AN UNUSUAL NATURE, AND DIFFERS MATERIALLY FROM CONDITIONS ORDINARILY ENCOUNTERED AND GENERALLY RECOGNIZED AS INHERENT IN WORK OF THE CHARACTERPROVIDED FOR IN THE PLANS/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS; THEN CONTRACTOR SHALL, PROMPTLY AFTER BECOMING AWARE THEREOF AND BEFORE FURTHER DISTURBING THE SUBSURFACEOR PHYSICAL CONDITIONS OR PERFORMING ANY WORK IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (EXCEPT IN AN EMERGENCY), NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER ABOUT SUCH CONDITION.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT FURTHER DISTURB SUCH CONDITION OR PERFORM ANY WORK IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (EXCEPT AS AFORESAID) UNTIL RECEIPT OF WRITTEN ORDER TO DOSO. ALL PARTIES INVOLVED (OWNER, ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, AND MUNICIPALITY IF APPLICABLE) SHALL AGREE UPON HOW TO PROCEED AND ANY RELATED COST IMPLICATIONS.4. UTILITIES: PRIVATE AND PUBLIC UTILITIES SUCH AS ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, GAS, CABLE, FIBER OPTIC ETC. ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY. ANY INFORMATIONSHOWN BY TCE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY (USUALLY TO ASSIST WITH PERMITTING). FINAL DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OFRESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES. COMPLIANCE WITH EASEMENTS AND REGULATIONS (STATE AND LOCAL) ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY.5. DIGSAFE: IN ACCORDANCE WITH VERMONT STATE LAW (VSA TITLE 30 CHAPTER 86 AND PSB RULE 3,800) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO CONTACT DIGSAFE SYSTEMS, INC.“DIGSAFE”. AT LEAST 48 HOURS , EXCLUDING SATURDAYS, SUNDAYS, AND LEGAL HOLIDAYS, BUT NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS BEFORE COMMENCING EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES, EXCEPT INAN EMERGENCY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRE-MARKING THE SITE AND MAINTAINING DESIGNATED MARKINGS. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON DIGSAFEREQUIREMENTS SEE WWW.DIGSAFE.COM . THE TOWN OF ESSEX WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS ARE CONSIDERED A PRIVATE UTILITY AND ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE DIGSAFE SYSTEM. ASSUCH, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE TOWN OF ESSEX AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE COMMENCING WORK TO LOCATE ALL WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROJECTLIMITS.6. JOBSITE SAFETY: NEITHER THE PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES OF TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE), NOR THE PRESENCE OF TCE OR ITS EMPLOYEES AND SUB CONSULTANTS AT ACONSTRUCTION SITE, SHALL RELIEVE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ANY OTHER ENTITY OF THEIR OBLIGATIONS, DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, SEQUENCE, TECHNIQUES OR PROCEDURES NECESSARY FOR PERFORMING, SUPERINTENDING OR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK OFCONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS REQUIRED BY ANY REGULATORY AGENCIES. TCE AND ITS PERSONNELHAVE NO AUTHORITY TO EXERCISE ANY CONTROL OVER ANY CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR OR OTHER ENTITY OR THEIR EMPLOYEES IN CONNECTION WITH THEIR WORK OR ANY HEALTHOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS. THE CLIENT AGREES THAT THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR JOBSITE SAFETY, AND WARRANTS THAT THIS INTENT SHALL BE MADE EVIDENTIN THE CLIENT'S AGREEMENT WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. THE CLIENT ALSO AGREES THAT THE CLIENT, TCE AND TCE'S CONSULTANTS SHALL BE INDEMNIFIED AND SHALL BE MADEADDITIONAL INSURED UNDER THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY .7. CODES AND STANDARDS COMPLIANCE:TCE SHALL EXERCISE USUAL AND CUSTOMARY PROFESSIONAL CARE IN ITS EFFORTS TO COMPLY WITH CODES, STANDARDS, REGULATIONS, ANDORDINANCES IN EFFECT. THE OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT SUCH REQUIREMENTS MAY BE SUBJECT TO VARIOUS AND CONTRADICTORY INTERPRETATIONS. TCE, THEREFORE, WILL USEITS REASONABLE PROFESSIONAL EFFORTS AND JUDGMENT TO INTERPRET APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AS THEY APPLY TO THE PROJECT. TCE, HOWEVER, CANNOT AND DOES NOTWARRANT OR GUARANTEE THAT THE PROJECT WILL COMPLY WITH ALL INTERPRETATIONS OF SUCH REQUIREMENTS.8. CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION: TCE MAY VISIT THE PROJECT AT APPROPRIATE INTERVALS DURING CONSTRUCTION TO BECOME GENERALLY FAMILIAR WITH THE PROGRESS AND QUALITYOF THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK AND TO DETERMINE IF THE WORK IS PRECEDING IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE OWNER HAS NOT RETAINED TCE TOMAKE DETAILED INSPECTIONS OR TO PROVIDE EXHAUSTIVE OR CONTINUOUS PROJECT REVIEW AND OBSERVATION SERVICES. TCE DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE PERFORMANCE OF, ANDSHALL NOT HAVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR, THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF ANY CONTRACTOR, SUB-CONTRACTOR, SUPPLIER OR ANY OTHER ENTITY FURNISHING MATERIALS OR PERFORMINGANY WORK ON THE PROJECT. TCE SHALL NOT SUPERVISE, DIRECT OR HAVE CONTROL OVER THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK NOR HAVE ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION MEANS,METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES OR PROCEDURES OF THE CONTRACTOR. IF THE OWNER DESIRES MORE EXTENSIVE PROJECT OBSERVATION OR FULL-TIME PROJECTREPRESENTATION, THE OWNER SHALL REQUEST SUCH SERVICES BE PROVIDED BY TCE AS ADDITIONAL SERVICES.9. UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT ALL UTILITIES LOCATED ON OR ADJACENT TO THE AREA SURVEYED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFYALL UTILITY CONFLICTS. ALL DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER.10. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES NOT INCORPORATED INTO THE FINAL DESIGN ARE TO BE REMOVED OR ABANDONED AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS.11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS (WITH TIES) FOR ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THOSE PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER AT THE COMPLETION OF THEPROJECT.12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR/RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS (ON OR OFF THE SITE) AS A DIRECT OR INDIRECT RESULT OF THE CONSTRUCTION.13. ALL GRASSED AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL FULL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED.14. MAINTAIN ALL TREES OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE AND OPERABLE FACILITIES AND UTILITIES.16. IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS SET IN THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL PERMIT CONDITIONS, LOCALPUBLIC WORKS STANDARDS AND ALL CONSTRUCTION SAFETY REGULATIONS.17. ANY DEWATERING NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE SITEWORK SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF THE CONTRACT AND SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY.18. IF THERE ARE ANY CONFLICTS OR INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER FOR VERIFICATION BEFORE WORKCONTINUES ON THE ITEM(S) IN QUESTION.19. ALL SYSTEM COMPONENTS (TANKS, PIPES, JOINTS) SHALL BE WATERTIGHT.PROJECT INFORMATION:1. OWNER OF RECORD: LARKIN FAMILY PARTNERSHIP410 SHELBURNE ROADBURLINGTON, VERMONT 054012. TAX PARCEL ID: BLD: 0570-00001LAND: 0570-0000123.PHYSICAL ADDRESS 1 DORSET STREET OF PROPERTY: SO. BURLINGTON, VERMONT 054034.PARCEL SIZE: 1.2± ACRES5. ZONING DISTRICT: COMMERCIAL 1,INTERSTATE HIGHWAY OVERLAY 2TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL BLANKETTEMPORARY VEGETATED SWALEWITH STONE CHECK DAMSLEGENDPROPOSEDEXISTINGSTREAMTRAILRIGHT-OF-WAY LINEEASEMENTSWETLAND LIMITFENCETREE LINESEWER MANHOLE (SMH)SEWER CLEANOUT (CO)STORM DRAINAGE CLEANOUTCATCH BASIN (CB)GUARD RAILVALVECURB STOP (CS)FIRE HYDRANT (HYD)WATER SUPPLY WELLEND CAPBLOWOFFUTILITY POLETELEPHONE MANHOLETELEPHONE PEDESTALLUMINAIREBOLLARD LIGHTTELEVISION PEDESTALIRON PIPESTEEL REBARIRON PIN (IP)CALCULATED POINTSOIL BORINGBENCHMARKSIGNPUMP STATION (PS)CONCRETE MONUMENTSTONEWALLOVERHEAD POWERUNDERGROUND POWEROVERHEAD TELEPHONESEWER FORCEMAINSTORM DRAINAGECURTAIN DRAINUNDERDRAINROOF DRAINFOOTING DRAINREMOVED/ABANDONEDWCABLE TELEVISIONFIBER OPTICPAVED DRIVE OR ROADGRAVEL DRIVE OR ROADTOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURSSITEUTILITIESSURVEYLINESYMBOLSITEPROPOSEDEXISTING REMOVED/ABANDONEDUTILITIESFIELDSURVEYOBSERVATION WELLPERCOLATION TESTSOIL TEST PITTO BE SETFOUND SETPAVED DRIVE OR ROADWITH CURBSEWER MAINSAND SERVICESWATER MAINSAND SERVICESLIQUID PROPANEOR NATURAL GASUNDERGROUNDTELEPHONEOVERHEAD POWER &TELEPHONEUNDERGROUND POWER &TELEPHONEOVERHEAD POWER,TELEPHONE & CABLEUNDERGROUND POWER,TELEPHONE & CABLEMARBLE OR STONEMONUMENTTCE CONTROL POINTMAG NAILTCE CONTROL POINTSTEEL REBARMTC ORTRANSFORMEROUTLET OREND SECTIONSTORM DRAINAGEMANHOLE (DMH)SS 124FMWCDUDRDFDGOHPOHTUTUP&T&CCTVFO124WDCDUDRDFDGOHPUPOHTUTOHP&TUP&TOHP&T&CUP&T&CCTVFOSSSFMFMFMWWWWDDDDCDCDCDUDUDUDRDRDRDFDFDFDGOHPOHPOHPUPUPUPOHTOHTOHTUTUTUTOHP&TOHP&TUP&TUP&TOHP&T&COHP&T&CUP&T&CUP&T&CCTVCTVCTVFOFOFOFMOHP&T&CUP&TOHP&TUPDPSPSPSW 50' BUILDINGSETBACKU.S. ROUTE 24"6"UPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUP314 311 312 312314315 314313EXISTING CONCRETE CURB ANDSIDEWALK4 D.I.4"TELEPHONEPEDESTALDORSET STREETWILLISTON ROADEXISTINGELECTRICALEQUIPMENTEXISTING TREE(TYP.)GUARD RAILGAS METERSUTILITYPOLE (TYP.)DROPCURBGRAVELAPRONEXISTINGHOTEL SIGNBASEBRICK PLANTERCHAIN LINKFENCEEXISTING STREETGOOSENECKLIGHTING (TYP.)EXISTINGDOUBLELANTERNLIGHTING (TYP.)4"6"10"UP UP UP UP UP UP UP UPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUTUTUTUTUTUTUT UTUTUTUTFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOUTUTUTTTTTSSSWWWWWWW12" DISS S SUPUP FOTELEPHONEMHELEC. MHT 2"EXISTING ELECTRICALEQUIPMENTINTERSTATE 89 OFF RAMPEXISTING RETAINING WALLEXISTING SIDEWALKEXISTINGBOLLARD (TYP.)SMHr=315.3iIN=309.9iIN=310.7± (6" STEEL)iIN=309.8± (4" STEEL)iOUT=309.76"4" STEEL6" STEEL6"15" RCP i=308.4010"6"EXISTINGRESTAURANT275 SEATSGG G G GGG G G GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGW 12" DI12" AC50' BUILDINGSETBACKZONE: I NTERST ATE HI GH W AY OVERLAY 2 (I H O2)ZONE: COMM ER CI AL 13/4" STEEL314315314 G WW W W WW W WW W W W W 24" DI 24" DI 24" DIEXISTING HOTEL 71 ROOMSMTCAPPROXIMATE LOCATIONEXISTING 2" WATERSERVICEPREVIOUSLYAPPROVED HOTEL89 ROOMS#SD 12-33312 313 313311 313 SMHr=315.5iIN=309.8 (4" STEEL)iOUT=310.4± (4" STEEL)iOUT=310.4± (6" STEEL)SSSSW WWWWWWDDDD12"12"CURRENT LEASE LINECBRIM=314.00i=310.40C.S.CONTROLPOINT # 1100ELEV.=315.80CONTROLPOINT # 1005ELEV.=314.64CONTROLPOINT # 1004ELEV.=312.06CONTROLPOINT # 1170ELEV.=312.67CBRIM=314.00i=310.50C.O.R=314.05i=307.6031412-052¬HalvorsenDevelopmentOne Dorset StreetSouth Burlington, VTExisting ConditionsC1-0108/22/141" = 20'14-091NPCSMM¬¬Sheet TitleProject TitleUse of These Drawings1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended forpreliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines orutilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities.¬They are not intended as construction drawings unless notedas such.2. Only drawings specifically marked “For Construction” areintended to be used in conjunction with contractdocuments, specifications, owner/contractor agreementsand to be fully coordinated with other disciplines, includingbut not limited to, the Architect, if applicable.¬ TheseDrawings shall not be used for construction layout. ContactTCE for any construction surveying services or to obtainelectronic data suitable for construction layout.3. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are nottransferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, andcopies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property.¬Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. Iferrors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought tothe attention of TCE immediately.4. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project,the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved,and accepted the drawings and have met with allapplicable parties/disciplines to insure these plans areproperly coordinated with other aspects of the Project.¬ TheOwner and Architect, are responsible for any buildingsshown, including an area measured a minimum five (5) feetaround any building.¬5. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains themost current revisions.Project Reference:Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Project Engineer:Approved By:No. Description Date ByRevisions478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COMTRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSNo. 8104CIVILJOHN P. PITROW IS KISTATE OF VERMO N T PRO FESSIONALENGINEERLICENSEDField Book:10FeetGraphic Scale20 20 40 60 80SURVEY NOTES:1. EXISTING SITE INFORMATION IS BASED ON A PLAN TITLED"ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR HALVORSEN REAL ESTATECORPORATION AND CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY,SURVEY OF RESTAURANT GROUND LEASE" PREPARED BY GRENIERENGINEERING, DATED NOVEMBER 2012. THE ABOVE MENTIONEDPLAN WAS PROVIDED ELECTRONICALLY AS WAS ADDITIONAL SITEINFORMATION FROM RUGGIANO ENGINEERING, INC. LIMITEDFIELD WORK WAS PERFORMED TO VERIFY THIS INFORMATION.2. UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND DO NOT NECESSARILYREPRESENT ALL UTILITIES LOCATED ON OR ADJACENT TO THE AREASURVEYED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL UTILITYCONFLICTS. ALL DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THEENGINEER.3. PERIMETER PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION TAKEN FROM PLANENTITLED "BOUNDARY SURVEY-LARKIN TARRANT HOEHLPARTNERSHIP" BY KREBBS & LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC. DATED JAN. 13, 1998, REVISED FEB. 2, 1998.4. A PLAN ENTITLED "ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY FORHALVORSEN REAL ESTATE CORPORATION AND CHICAGO TITLEINSURANCE COMPANY SURVEY OF RESTAURANT GROUND LEASE"BY GREENER ENGINEERING, P.C., DATED NOVEMBER 2012.5. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC AND UTILITIES INFORMATION FROM PLANENTITLED "UTILITY PLAN-HOWARD JOHNSON'S" BY KREBBS &LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. DATED DEC. 22, 1997,REVISED 3/20/98.LOCATION MAPNTSSPEAR STREETDORSET STREETWILLISTON ROADEAST AVE ROUTE 2INTERSTATE 89BURLINGTONSOUTHBURLINGTONSITEEXIT 14NOTES:1. ADDITIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CONDUCTED BY TRUDELLCONSULTING ENGINEERS ON DEC. 6, 2012.2. LOCATED DIG SAFE UTILITIES (VT. GAS SYSTEM, FIBER OPTIC, WATER,UNDERGROUND POWER & TELEPHONE) ON SEPT. 12, 2013.3. PROJECT IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS. REFER TO PLAN ENTITLED"ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR HALVORSEN REAL ESTATECORPORATION" DATED NOVEMBER 2012 BY GRENIERENGINEERING, P.C.Minor Revisions for WWSMM01/28/15 50' BUILDINGSETBACKU.S. ROUTE 24"6"UPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUP314 311 312 312314315 314313EXISTING CONCRETE CURB ANDSIDEWALK4 D.I.4"TELEPHONEPEDESTALDORSET STREETWILLISTON ROADEXISTINGELECTRICALEQUIPMENTEXISTING TREE(TYP.)GUARD RAILGAS METERSUTILITYPOLE (TYP.)DROPCURBGRAVELAPRONEXISTINGHOTEL SIGNBASEBRICK PLANTERCHAIN LINKFENCEEXISTING STREETGOOSENECKLIGHTING (TYP.)EXISTINGDOUBLELANTERNLIGHTING (TYP.)4"6"10"UP UP UP UP UP UP UP UPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUTUTUTUTUTUTUT UTUTUTUTFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOFOUTUTUTTTTTSSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWW12" DISSSSS S S SUPUP FOTELEPHONEMHELEC. MHT 2"EXISTING ELECTRICALEQUIPMENTINTERSTATE 89 OFF RAMPEXISTING RETAINING WALLEXISTING SIDEWALKEXISTINGBOLLARD (TYP.)SMHr=315.3iIN=309.9iIN=310.7± (6" STEEL)iIN=309.8± (4" STEEL)iOUT=309.76"4" STEEL6" STEEL6"15" RCP i=308.4010"6"EXISTINGRESTAURANT275 SEATSGG G G GGG G G GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGW 12" DI12" AC50' BUILDINGSETBACKZONE: I NTERST ATE HI GH W AY OVERLAY 2 (I H O2)ZONE: COMM ER CI AL 13/4" STEEL314315314 G WW W W WW W WW W W W W 24" DI 24" DI 24" DIEXISTING HOTEL 71 ROOMSMTCAPPROXIMATE LOCATIONEXISTING 2" WATERSERVICEPREVIOUSLYAPPROVED HOTEL89 ROOMS#SD 12-33312 313 313311 313 SMHr=315.5iIN=309.8 (4" STEEL)iOUT=310.4± (4" STEEL)iOUT=310.4± (6" STEEL)SSSSWWWW WWWWWWDDDD12"12"CBRIM=314.00i=310.40C.S.CONTROLPOINT # 1100ELEV.=315.80CONTROLPOINT # 1005ELEV.=314.64CONTROLPOINT # 1004ELEV.=312.06CONTROLPOINT # 1170ELEV.=312.67CBRIM=314.00i=310.50C.O.R=314.05i=307.6031412-052¬HalvorsenDevelopmentOne Dorset StreetSouth Burlington, VTDemolition PlanC1-0208/22/141" = 20'14-091NPCSMM¬¬Sheet TitleProject TitleUse of These Drawings1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended forpreliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines orutilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities.¬They are not intended as construction drawings unless notedas such.2. Only drawings specifically marked “For Construction” areintended to be used in conjunction with contractdocuments, specifications, owner/contractor agreementsand to be fully coordinated with other disciplines, includingbut not limited to, the Architect, if applicable.¬ TheseDrawings shall not be used for construction layout. ContactTCE for any construction surveying services or to obtainelectronic data suitable for construction layout.3. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are nottransferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, andcopies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property.¬Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. Iferrors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought tothe attention of TCE immediately.4. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project,the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved,and accepted the drawings and have met with allapplicable parties/disciplines to insure these plans areproperly coordinated with other aspects of the Project.¬ TheOwner and Architect, are responsible for any buildingsshown, including an area measured a minimum five (5) feetaround any building.¬5. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains themost current revisions.Project Reference:Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Project Engineer:Approved By:No. Description Date ByRevisions478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COMTRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSNO. 9022ENVIRONMENTALSHANE M. MUL LENSTATE OF VERMO N T PRO FESSIONALENGINEERLICENSEDField Book:0FeetGraphic Scale20 20 40 60 80TO BE REMOVEDTO BE REMOVED,TO BE REMOVEDTO BE REMOVEDTO BE REMOVEDTO BE REMOVEDSAWCUT LINE(SHOWN DASHED)EXISTINGBOLLARDS TOBE REMOVEDEXISTING UNDERGROUNDPOWER TO BE ABANDONEDTO BEREMOVEDTO BE DEMOLISHEDTO BE REMOVEDTO BE REMOVEDTO BE REMOVEDEXISTING LUMINAIRETO BE REMOVEDTO BE REMOVEDNOTES:1. COORDINATE WITH UTILITY COMPANIES AS NECESSARY TOFACILITATE SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF FEATURES SHOWN.2. NEW ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER AND CONDUIT TO SERVEADJACENT HOTEL TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO REMAININGONSITE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND CONDUIT. SEE SHEETC2-02 FOR PROPOSED UTILITY LOCATION.BEGIN COLD PLANE(SHOWN SHADED)EXISTING MTC CABINET TO BE RELOCATEDRELOCATION OF MTC CABINET TO BECOORDINATED WITH HOTEL AND GMPEntrance1DAB09/29/14Minor Demo Adjustments2SMM12/22/14TO BE REMOVED,T.B.R.T.B.R.Minor Revisions for WW3SMM01/28/15 12-052¬HalvorsenDevelopmentOne Dorset StreetSouth Burlington, VTOverall Site PlanC2-0108/22/141" = 30'14-091RMP/NPCSMM¬¬0FeetGraphic Scale30 30 60 90 120ZONING INFORMATION:1. ZONING: COMMERCIAL 1/INTERSTATE HIGHWAY OVERLAY 22. COVERAGE CALCULATIONS: TOTAL PARCEL AREA: 244,503 SF (5.61 AC.)LEASE AREA: 53,144 SF (1.22 AC.)EXISTINGBUILDING 41,450 SF 17.0%PAVEMENT 110,319 SF 45.1%SIDEWALKS 16,363 SF 6.7%TOTAL IMPACTS168,131 SF68.8%FRONT YARD (WILLISTON RD.) 7,900 SFTOTAL IMPACT 7,035 SF 89.0%FRONT YARD (DORSET ST.) 26,870 SFTOTAL IMPACT 14,740 SF 54.9%PROPOSED (BASED ON PUD TOTAL PARCEL AREA)BUILDING 42,447 SF 17.4%PAVEMENT 100,167 SF 41.0%SIDEWALKS 21,291 SF 8.7%TOTAL IMPACTS163,905 SF67.0%FRONT YARD (WILLISTON RD.) 7,900 SFTOTAL IMPACT 3,502 SF 44.3%FRONT YARD (DORSET ST.) 26,870 SFTOTAL IMPACT 12,890 SF 48.0%FRONT YARD WAIVER REQUESTED FOR DORSET & WILLISTON ROAD3. PARKING REQUIRED: 89 ROOM HOTEL 89 SPACES8 EMPLOYEES 8 SPACES71 ROOM HOTEL 71 SPACES8 EMPLOYEES 8 SPACESRETAIL 57 SPACES 233 SPACES CURRENT EXISTING PARKING SD #12-33 267 SPACES (80 SPACES ON SITE) PROPOSED PARKING (THIS APPLICATION) 233 SPACES (57 SPACES ON SITE)EXISTING HOTEL71 ROOMSMALL ACCESSU.S. ROUTE 2DORSET STREETWILLISTON ROADINTERSTATE 89 OFF RAMP GROUND LEASE LINEPREVIOUSLY APPROVED HOTEL89 ROOMS#SD 12-331DAB09/29/14PROPOSED COMMERCIAL BUILDING9,750 S.F.1,492 S.F. MEZZANINE57 PARKING SPACESSheet TitleProject TitleUse of These Drawings1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended forpreliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines orutilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities.¬They are not intended as construction drawings unless notedas such.2. Only drawings specifically marked “For Construction” areintended to be used in conjunction with contractdocuments, specifications, owner/contractor agreementsand to be fully coordinated with other disciplines, includingbut not limited to, the Architect, if applicable.¬ TheseDrawings shall not be used for construction layout. ContactTCE for any construction surveying services or to obtainelectronic data suitable for construction layout.3. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are nottransferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, andcopies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property.¬Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. Iferrors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought tothe attention of TCE immediately.4. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project,the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved,and accepted the drawings and have met with allapplicable parties/disciplines to insure these plans areproperly coordinated with other aspects of the Project.¬ TheOwner and Architect, are responsible for any buildingsshown, including an area measured a minimum five (5) feetaround any building.¬5. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains themost current revisions.Project Reference:Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Project Engineer:Approved By:No. Description Date ByRevisions478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COMTRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSNo. 8104CIVILJOHN P. PITROW ISKISTATE OF VERMON T PROF ESSIONAL ENGINEERLICENSEDField Book:15°±TrueMagneticSNOWSTORAGE22.5'17.3'9.5'Entrance & Building Dist. toProperty Line2DAB11/18/14Entrance & Sidewalks3DAB11/26/14Response to City Staff Comments4SMM12/22/14Revisions for Final Plat5SMM01/19/15Updated Coverage CalcsNOTE:"WAYFINDING AND/OR INTERPRETIVE INFORMATION"MAY BE INSTALLED WITHIN OR ON THE PERGOLA.6SMM01/22/15Add "WAYFINDING" Note7DAB03/06/15Relocated, Water Line, MoveStructure Within Lease Line, AddProposed Lease LineModification & Update ZoningInformation 12-052¬Sheet TitleProject TitleUse of These Drawings1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended forpreliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines orutilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities.¬They are not intended as construction drawings unless notedas such.2. Only drawings specifically marked “For Construction” areintended to be used in conjunction with contractdocuments, specifications, owner/contractor agreementsand to be fully coordinated with other disciplines, includingbut not limited to, the Architect, if applicable.¬ TheseDrawings shall not be used for construction layout. ContactTCE for any construction surveying services or to obtainelectronic data suitable for construction layout.3. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are nottransferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, andcopies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property.¬Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. Iferrors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought tothe attention of TCE immediately.4. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project,the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved,and accepted the drawings and have met with allapplicable parties/disciplines to insure these plans areproperly coordinated with other aspects of the Project.¬ TheOwner and Architect, are responsible for any buildingsshown, including an area measured a minimum five (5) feetaround any building.¬5. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains themost current revisions.Project Reference:Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Project Engineer:Approved By:No. Description Date ByRevisions478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COMTRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSNo. 8104CIVILJOHN P. PITROW ISKISTATE OF VERMON T PROF ESSIONAL ENGINEERLICENSEDField Book:HalvorsenDevelopmentOne Dorset StreetSouth Burlington, VTSite PlanC2-0208/22/141" = 20'14-091RMP/NPCSMM¬¬0FeetGraphic Scale20 20 40 60 80PREVIOUSLYAPPROVED HOTELNOTES:1. NO LARGE SNOW LOADING IS SHOWN ONSITE.MANAGEMENT COMPANY WILL BE REQUIRED TOREMOVE SNOW FROM SITE AFTER SIGNIFICANTSNOW EVENTS.2. INSTALL NEW TRANSFORMER AND CONDUITSUCH THAT ELECTRICAL SERVICE IS NOTINTERRUPTED.3. DISINFECT WATER SERVICE PER VT WATER SUPPLYRULE APPENDIX A PART 11.8.02.4. NO FLOODWAY ON SITE PER AVAILABLE FIRMMAPS.5. TEST BORING REQUIRED TO DETERMINELOCATION OF 12" DI AND 12" AC CONNECTION.REPORT TO ENGINEER WITH FINDINGS TODETERMINE IF THERE ARE ANY CONFLICTS WITHSTRUCTURE.EXISTINGPROPOSEDEXISTINGMUTCD R10-730"24"1DAB09/29/14Entrance & Signage2DAB11/18/14Entrance & Sidewalks GROUND LEASE LINENEW "DO NOT ENTER" SIGNMUTCD R5-1 30"x30" WITH"ONE WAY" MUCTD SIGN R6-1R3DAB11/26/14Response to City Staff Comments4SMM12/22/14Changes for Final PlatMinor Revisions for WW5SMM01/28/156DAB03/06/15Move Structure Within LeaseLine, Add Proposed Lease LineModification & Relocated WaterLine66 12-052¬Sheet TitleProject TitleUse of These Drawings1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended forpreliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines orutilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities.¬They are not intended as construction drawings unless notedas such.2. Only drawings specifically marked “For Construction” areintended to be used in conjunction with contractdocuments, specifications, owner/contractor agreementsand to be fully coordinated with other disciplines, includingbut not limited to, the Architect, if applicable.¬ TheseDrawings shall not be used for construction layout. ContactTCE for any construction surveying services or to obtainelectronic data suitable for construction layout.3. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are nottransferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, andcopies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property.¬Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. Iferrors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought tothe attention of TCE immediately.4. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project,the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved,and accepted the drawings and have met with allapplicable parties/disciplines to insure these plans areproperly coordinated with other aspects of the Project.¬ TheOwner and Architect, are responsible for any buildingsshown, including an area measured a minimum five (5) feetaround any building.¬5. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains themost current revisions.Project Reference:Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Project Engineer:Approved By:No. Description Date ByRevisions478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COMTRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSNo. 8104CIVILJOHN P. PITROW ISKISTATE OF VERMON T PROF ESSIONAL ENGINEERLICENSEDField Book:HalvorsenDevelopmentOne Dorset StreetSouth Burlington, VTEPSC PlanC5-0108/22/141" = 20'14-091NPCSMM¬¬0FeetGraphic Scale20 20 40 60 80Entrance1DAB09/29/14PREVIOUSLYAPPROVED HOTEL2DAB11/18/14Entrance & Sidewalks3DAB11/26/14Responsed to City StaffCommentsGENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECTTHIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF THE DEMOLITION OF AN EXISTING BUILDING, CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING WITHNEW PARKING AND UTILITIES ON ROUTE 15 IN JERICHO, VERMONT. EARTHWORK FOR THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF THECONSTRUCTION OF A NEW BUILDING, NEW PARKING AREA, STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM, AND TRENCHINGFOR UTILITIES. DUE TO THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT, THIS SITE QUALIFIES FOR THE LOW-RISK CONSTRUCTION GENERALPERMIT. LOCAL REGULATIONS REQUIRE A SITE SPECIFIC PLAN FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL.SITE DRAINAGE CHARACTERISTICSTHE SITE GENERALLY SLOPES FROM WEST TO EAST, DRAINING TO AN EXISTING CATCH BASIN AND CULVERT SYSTEM.A SMALL PORTION OF THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE DRAINS SOUTHWARD TO THE INTERSECTION OF ROUTE 15 ANDDICKINSON STREET. THE ENTIRE SITE DOES NOT EXCEED 5% ANYWHERE IN THE PROJECT AREA.DRAINAGE, WATERWAYS AND BODIES OF WATERBROWNS RIVER IS THE ULTIMATE RECEIVING WATER FOR THE PROJECT, RUNOFF WILL BE CONVEYED TO THE RIVER BYSTORMWATER SYSTEM DISCHARGING TO ROADSIDE SWALES.LOCATION, EXISTING FEATURES, BUILDINGS & UTILITIESTHE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON ROUTE 15 IN JERICHO TO THE NORTH OF DICKINSON ST. THERE IS A CURRENTBUILDING ON THE SITE NOW WITH GRAVEL PARKING.VEGETATIONTHE SITE IS CURRENTLY MOSTLY GRAVEL DRIVE AND PARKING AREA AROUND THE BUILDING WITH SOME SMALLAREAS OF VEGETATION.SOILSSOILS IN THE AREA OF EARTHWORK CONSIST OF STETSON GRAVELLY FINE SANDY LOAM (K = 0.10).PROXIMITY TO NATURAL AND MAN-MADE WATER FEATURESBROWNS RIVER IS APPROXIMATELY 1200 FEET SOUTHEAST OF THE PROJECT AREA.GRADING PLAN, TIMETABLE & CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCEFIRST, THE DISTURBANCE LIMITS ARE TO BE MARKED WITH BARRIER TAPE AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS. PERIMETERSEDIMENT CONTROL FEATURES (E.G. SILT FENCE) AND STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WILL BE INSTALLED.ONCE THESE ITEMS ARE INSTALLED, EARTHWORK MAY PROCEED ACCORDING TO THE EPSC PLAN. DUE TO THESMALL SIZE OF THE SITE (APPROXIMATELY 2.3 ACRES), THE ENTIRE SITE MAY BE OPEN AT ONE TIME. THE SITE SHALLREMAIN COMPLIANT WITH THE SITE STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS NOTED ON THE EPSC PLAN SET.EPSC PLAN & TIMETABLEBY PROVIDING PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AND THE SIZE OF THE SITE, THE RECEIVING WATERS AREPROTECTED FROM EROSION FROM THE SITE. ALL MEASURES WILL BE REMOVED ONCE THE SITE HAS ACHIEVED FINALSTABILIZATION (PAVEMENT AND VEGETATIVE COVER).STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTSALL AREAS OF DISTURBANCE MUST HAVE TEMPORARY OR FINAL STABILIZATION WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) CALENDARDAYS OF THE INITIAL DISTURBANCE. AFTER THIS TIME, ANY DISTURBANCE IN THE AREA MUST BE STABILIZED AT THE ENDOF EACH WORK DAY; HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS APPLY:1. IF WORK IS TO CONTINUE IN THE AREA WITHIN THE NEXT 24 HOURS AND THERE IS NO PRECIPITATIONFORECASTED IN THAT TIME PERIOD, WORK MAY CONTINUE WITHOUT STABILIZATION, AND,2. IF THE WORK IS OCCURRING IN A SELF-CONTAINED EXCAVATION WITH A DEPTH OF TWO (2) FEET OR GREATER(E.G. FOUNDATION EXCAVATION, UTILITY TRENCH), STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED.STABILIZATION IS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS PROVIDED IN THE PLAN SET.REQUIREMENTS FOR WINTER CONSTRUCTIONTHE FOLLOWING MEASURES MUST BE ADHERED FOR CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN OCTOBER 15 AND APRIL 15.TO ENSURE COVER OF DISTURBED SOIL IN ADVANCE OF A MELT EVENT, AREAS OF DISTURBED SOIL MUST BESTABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY, WITH THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS:1. IF NO PRECIPITATION WITHIN 24 HOURS IS FORECAST AND WORK WILL RESUME IN THE SAME DISTURBED AREAWITHIN 24 HOURS, DAILY STABILIZATION IS NOT NECESSARY.2. DISTURBED AREAS THAT COLLECT AND RETAIN RUNOFF, SUCH AS HOUSE FOUNDATIONS OR OPEN UTILITYTRENCHES.PRIOR TO STABILIZATION, SNOW OR ICE MUST BE REMOVED TO A THICKNESS OF NO MORE THAN 1 INCH.MULCH USED FOR TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MUST BE APPLIED AT DOUBLE THE STANDARD RATE, OR A MINIMUM OF3 INCHES WITH AN 80-90% COVER.SILT FENCE AND OTHER PRACTICES REQUIRING EARTH DISTURBANCE MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO GROUND FREEZE.DRAINAGE STRUCTURES MUST BE KEPT OPEN AND FREE OF SNOW AND ICE DAMS.A MINIMUM 25 FOOT BUFFER SHALL BE MAINTAINED FROM PERIMETER CONTROLS SUCH AS SILT FENCES.IN AREAS OF DISTURBANCE THAT DRAIN TO A WATER BODY WITHIN 100 FEET, SILT FENCE SHALL BE REINFORCED.ALL AREAS THAT ARE DISTURBED DURING WINTER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STABILIZED BY APPLYING SEED ANDMULCH AT TWICE THE NORMAL RATE AND THEN COVERED WITH STRAW MATTING.EPSC NARRATIVE4SMM12/22/14Revisions for Final PlatPROJECT AREA = 1.35 AC.5DAB03/06/15Relocated Water Line, MoveStructure Within Lease Line, AddProposed Lease LineModification 12-052¬Sheet TitleProject TitleUse of These Drawings1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended forpreliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines orutilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities.¬They are not intended as construction drawings unless notedas such.2. Only drawings specifically marked “For Construction” areintended to be used in conjunction with contractdocuments, specifications, owner/contractor agreementsand to be fully coordinated with other disciplines, includingbut not limited to, the Architect, if applicable.¬ TheseDrawings shall not be used for construction layout. ContactTCE for any construction surveying services or to obtainelectronic data suitable for construction layout.3. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are nottransferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, andcopies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property.¬Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. Iferrors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought tothe attention of TCE immediately.4. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project,the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved,and accepted the drawings and have met with allapplicable parties/disciplines to insure these plans areproperly coordinated with other aspects of the Project.¬ TheOwner and Architect, are responsible for any buildingsshown, including an area measured a minimum five (5) feetaround any building.¬5. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains themost current revisions.Project Reference:Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Project Engineer:Approved By:No. Description Date ByRevisions478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COMTRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSNo. 8104CIVILJOHN P. PITROW ISKISTATE OF VERMON T PROF ESSIONAL ENGINEERLICENSEDField Book:Site DetailsC8-0108/22/14SHOWN14-091RMPSMM¬¬SD-0011"=1'LAST REVISED 05/14/20142013 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSTYPICAL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCRUSHED GRAVELWEARING COURSE (TYPE IV) (VAOT 406.03)BASE COURSE (TYPE III) (VAOT 406.03)MIRAFI 500X STABILIZATION FABRICINSTALLATION IN ACCORDANCE WITHMANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONSBDCAUNDISTURBED SUBGRADE ORCOMPACTED FILLACBD6122-1/21-1/26" SAND BORROW AND CUSHION TO BE USEDIN POORLY DRAINED SOILS OR OVERBEDROCK FOR ROADS AND SIDEWALKS(VAOT 703.03)PARKING LOTSTHICKNESS (INCHES)212121-1/2NOTES:ECOMMERCIALRESIDENTIALI. SUBBASE, SAND CUSHION AND SUBGRADE SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTEDAND COMPACTED TO THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN IN ACCORDANCE WITHVERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDA-76. WHERE MORE STRINGENT LOCAL ORDINANCES HAVE BEENADOPTED RELATIVE TO ROAD DIMENSIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, THEYSHOULD GOVERN.2. COMPACT ALL SUBBASE MATERIALS TO 95% MAXIMUM DENSITY(STANDARD PROCTOR).3. IF GROUNDWATER OR SOFT SPOTS ARE ENCOUNTERED CONTACT THEENGINEER TO DISCUSS ADDED MEASURES SUCH AS UNDERDRAIN. SLOPESUBBASE TO UNDERDRAIN LOW POINTS.SECTIONGRAVEL BASE (VAOT 704.04)SD-0271"=1'-0"LAST REVISED 03/26/20132013 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSCONCRETE CURB, & SIDEWALK1/4"/FT.NOTE: ADDITIONAL MEASURES AT BUILDINGENTRANCE POINTS MAY BE REQUIRED PERTHE ARCHITECT, OWNER, OR STRUCTURALENGINEER. THIS MAY INCLUDE FOOTING FORTHE SIDEWALK, ADDITIONAL GRAVEL,UNDERDRAIN, OR ADDITIONALLY REBAR.FROST ACTION IS NOT ALWAYS EASILYPREDICTED BUT THE INTENT IS TO MINIMIZEFROST ACTION IN SENSITIVE AREAS SUCH ASHANDICAP RAMPS AND DOOR ENTRANCEPOINTS.30"6" SAND BORROW AND CUSHION TO BEUSED IN POORLY DRAINED SOILS OR OVERBEDROCK (VAOT 703.03) FOR BOTHROADWAY AND SIDEWALKCOMPACT ALL SUBBASE MATERIALSTO 95% MAXIMUM DENSITY(STANDARD PROCTOR)MIRAFI 500X ROAD STABILIZATION FABRICGRAVEL FOR SUB-BASECRUSHER RUN GRAVEL OR PLANT MIXSLOPE SUBBASE TO DRAINBITUMINOUSPAVEMENTCLASS BCONCRETECURB4,000 PSI CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE SITE PLAN FOR WIDTH)EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL (TO BE PLACEDWHERE SIDEWALK ABUTS A STRUCTURE)REBAR (TYPICAL)6"7" REVEAL1" R18" MIN.5"18"SD-011LAST REVISED 03/20/20132013 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSPAVEMENT JOINT DEAIL30"REFER TO TYPICALBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSECTIONEXISTING SURFACECOLD PLANESAW CUTFINE-GRADED CRUSHED GRAVELDENSE-GRADED CRUSHED STONEHalvorsenDevelopmentOne Dorset StreetSouth Burlington, VTSD-0131"=1-0'LAST REVISED 07/18/20132013 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSREINFORCED CONCRETE PAD FOR DUMPSTER6" CLASS A CONCRETE SLAB, BROOM FINISH#5 REINFORCING BARS 12" O.C. BOTH WAYS,3" CLEAR12" BANK RUN GRAVELCOMPACTED SUBBASE9"SD-0351"=1'-0"LAST REVISED 5/17/20132013 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSPRECAST CONCRETE CURB7.5"8"3/4" PIN HOLES6'SD-050LAST REVISED 08/20/20142014 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSBIKE RACK2 3/8" O.D. GALVANIZED STEEL SCHEDULE40 PIPE WITH POWDERCOAT FINISH BLACK4'-3"7'-9"6'4'NOTES:1. INSTALL BIKE RACKS ACCORDING TOMANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICAION'S.2. SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEWAND APPROVAL PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.SD-051LAST REVISED 08/20/20142014 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSBOLLARD MOUNTED SIGNTHIS DIMENSION SHALL BE A A MAXIMUM OF 8' FOR ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE.THIS DIMENSION SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' FOR ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE.H7' MIN.3'-6"1'-9"CAP STEEL PIPE POSTTYPICAL SIGN2 12" DIA. STEEL POST (PAINT COLORSELECTED BY ARCHITECT)BOLLARD (SEE DETAIL)FINISH GRADE SURFACE TREATMENT VARIESCROSS SECTION A-A'103/06/15 BJOSection A-A' 12-052Sheet TitleProject TitleUse of These Drawings1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended forpreliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines orutilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities.¬They are not intended as construction drawings unless notedas such.2. Only drawings specifically marked “For Construction” areintended to be used in conjunction with contractdocuments, specifications, owner/contractor agreementsand to be fully coordinated with other disciplines, includingbut not limited to, the Architect, if applicable.¬ TheseDrawings shall not be used for construction layout. ContactTCE for any construction surveying services or to obtainelectronic data suitable for construction layout.3. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are nottransferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, andcopies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property.¬Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. Iferrors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought tothe attention of TCE immediately.4. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project,the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved,and accepted the drawings and have met with allapplicable parties/disciplines to insure these plans areproperly coordinated with other aspects of the Project.¬ TheOwner and Architect, are responsible for any buildingsshown, including an area measured a minimum five (5) feetaround any building.¬5. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains themost current revisions.Project Reference:Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Project Engineer:Approved By:No. Description Date ByRevisions478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COMTRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSNo. 8104CIVILJOHN P. PITROW IS KISTATE OF VERMO N T PRO FESSIONAL ENGINEERLICENSEDField Book:109/29/14 DABAdd Bull Nose Curb DetailSite DetailsC8-0208/22/14SHOWN14-091BKA ARCHITECTSSMM¬¬¬HalvorsenDevelopmentOne Dorset StreetSouth Burlington, VTNOTE: DETAILSPROVIDED BY OTHERSSW-0011" = 1'LAST REVISED 04/21/20142014 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSTYPICAL STORM DRAIN TRENCHNOTES ON STORM DRAIN TRENCH:1'FINISHED ROAD GRADED + 8"1'A WET TRENCH SHALL BE DEWATERED PRIOR TOINSTALLING BEDDINGTHE LETTER "D" SHOWN ON THE DETAIL INDICATESTHE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE.DEPTH OF STORM DRAIN LINES VARY, REFER TOPLANS FOR DEPTH IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS.DFOR PAVED SURFACESVARIES(SEE PAVEMENT SECTION)FOR GRASSED AREASREPLACE TOPSOIL, SEED, AND MULCHOVERFILL TO ALLOW FOR SETTLEMENT.THOROUGHLY COMPACTED SELECTEDBACKFILL FROM TRENCH EXCAVATION,FREE OF STONES LARGER THAN 3" INDIAMETER. COMPACT BACKFILL IN 6" LIFTS.THE SIDES OF TRENCHES SHALL BE SHEETEDOR SLOPED TO VOSHA STANDARDS.HDPE PIPETHOROUGHLY COMPACTED 3/4" CRUSHEDSTONE BEDDING FOR CMP, PVC, OR HDPE PIPE.UNDISTURBED SOIL212/22/14 SMMRelocate Storm DetailEN-010LAST REVISED 06/13/20132013 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSGRADINGA. GENERAL: UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF GRADING,INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACES WITHINTHE SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, COMPACT WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPESBETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE INDICATED, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTSAND EXISTING GRADES.B. GRADING OUTSIDE BUILDING LINES: GRADE AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGLINES TO DRAIN AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURES AND TO PREVENT PONDING.FINISH SURFACES FREE FROM IRREGULAR SURFACE CHANGES, AND AS FOLLOWS:1. LAWN OR UNPAVED AREAS: FINISH AREAS THAT ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOILTO WITHIN 0.10 FEET ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED SUBGRADEELEVATIONS. LAWNS SHALL BE GRADED SO THAT NO PONDING OCCURS.THE GRADING OF LAWNS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED BY THE ENGINEER IFPONDING OCCURS.2. SIDEWALKS: SHAPE THE SURFACE OF AREAS UNDER WALKS TO LINE, GRADEAND CROSS-SECTION, WITH FINISH SURFACES NOT MORE THAN 0.10 FEETABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED SUBGRADE ELEVATION.3. PAVEMENT: SHAPE THE SURFACE OF AREAS UNDER PAVEMENT TO LINE,GRADE AND CROSS-SECTION, WITH THE FINISH SURFACE NOT MORE THAN0.10 FEET ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED SUBGRADE ELEVATION.PAVEMENT MUST DRAIN SO THAT NO WATER PONDING OCCURS. IFPONDING OCCURS, THE PAVING WILL NOT BE UNACCEPTED BY THEENGINEER. 12-052¬Sheet TitleProject TitleUse of These Drawings1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended forpreliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines orutilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities.¬They are not intended as construction drawings unless notedas such.2. Only drawings specifically marked “For Construction” areintended to be used in conjunction with contractdocuments, specifications, owner/contractor agreementsand to be fully coordinated with other disciplines, includingbut not limited to, the Architect, if applicable.¬ TheseDrawings shall not be used for construction layout. ContactTCE for any construction surveying services or to obtainelectronic data suitable for construction layout.3. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are nottransferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, andcopies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property.¬Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. Iferrors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought tothe attention of TCE immediately.4. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project,the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved,and accepted the drawings and have met with allapplicable parties/disciplines to insure these plans areproperly coordinated with other aspects of the Project.¬ TheOwner and Architect, are responsible for any buildingsshown, including an area measured a minimum five (5) feetaround any building.¬5. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains themost current revisions.Project Reference:Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Project Engineer:Approved By:No. Description Date ByRevisions478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COMTRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSNo. 8104CIVILJOHN P. PITROW ISKISTATE OF VERMON T PROF ESSIONAL ENGINEERLICENSEDField Book:Stormwater DetailsC8-0508/22/14SHOWN14-091RMPSMM¬¬HalvorsenDevelopmentOne Dorset StreetSouth Burlington, VTSW-0021/2"=1'LAST REVISED 04/21/20142014 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSPOLYETHYLENE (HDPE) END SECTIONELEVATION VIEW"D"POLYETHYLENE FLARED END SECTION,POLYETHYLENE FLARED END SECTION,ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS (ADS)SMOOTH INTERIOR, CORRUGATEDPOLYETHYLENE PIPE (HDPE).SITE PLANSLOPE AS PERSIDES OF END SECTIONTO MATCH TAPEREDFINISHED GRADEADS OR EQUAL.N-12, OR EQUAL.EXTERIOR, HIGH DENSITYPLAN VIEWADS OR EQUAL.SITE PLANSLOPE AS PERINLETCONDITIONOUTLETCONDITIONOUTLETCONDITIONINLETCONDITION"D"PROVIDE 12" TYPE II RIPRAPOVER 12" TYPE P204 RIPRAPFOR PIPES 15" OR SMALLER.USE 18" TYPE II OVER 12" TYPEP204 FOR PIPE OVER 15".MINIMUM AREA 5' WIDE x 20' LONGMIRAFI 500X FABRIC(OR APPROVED EQUAL)SW-0051/2" = 1'LAST REVISED 08/08/20142014 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSTYPICAL STORMWATER MANHOLEMAXIMUM PIPE SIZEMANHOLE NOTES1. IF DEPTH OF MANHOLE IS 7 FEETOR LESS FROM RIM TO CENTERLINEINVERT, THEN A FLAT TOP WILL BEINSTALLED. IF DEPTH IS MORETHAN 7 FEET, THEN A CONICALTOP WILL BE INSTALLED.2. ADJUST RIM AS NEEDED TO MATCHFINAL PAVEMENT.6"48"VARIES12" INCREMENTS8"32" MIN.56" MAX.12"STORM DRAIN LINE24" OPENING4"36"5"HEAVY DUTY FRAME & LID LABELED "DRAIN"NEENAH R-1649 OR LEBARON LC 266GROUT FRAME TO 4 INCHES FROM TOPPRECAST CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RINGSECTION MINIMUM 4 INCHES, MAXIMUM12 INCHESECCENTRIC CONICAL TOP SECTIONCOPOLYMER POLYPROPYLENELADDER RUNGS 12" O.C.BUTYL JOINT SEALANTWELDED WIRE FABRIC (6 X 6 WWF)RUBBER BOOT (PRESS SEAL PSX)#4 BARS, 12" O.C., BOTH WAYS12" GRAVEL OR 1" STONE FOR SUB-BASEOR AS REQUIRED BY ENGINEER IF WETAND OR UNSTABLE CONDITIONS EXIST.UNDISTURBED SOIL30" PVC24" RCP,CSP,CAAP,CPEPSW-0071/2"=1-0"'LAST REVISED 04/21/20142014 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSTYPICAL CATCH BASINTW5"6"7"9"TL8"8"24"36"8"12"48"54"TB8"12"12"12"30"42"PVC48"INSIDEDIAMETER54"60"72"96"60"TYPED4D5D6D8MAX. PIPE DIAMETERRCP,CSP,CAAP,CDEPPRECAST CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RINGMINIMUM 4 INCHES, MAXIMUM 12 INCHES12" GRAVEL OR 1" STONE FORSUB-BASE OR AS REQUIRED BYENGINEER IF WET AND ORUNSTABLE CONDITIONS EXIST.4"24" SUMPVARIES SEE PLANTLTBDIAMETER SEE TABLETW24"HEAVY DUTY 3 FLANGE INLET FRAME & GRATE,NEENAH R-3405B OR LEBARON LF248-2 WHEREINLET IS NOT LOCATED NEXT TO A CURB, USEA 4 FLANGE FRAMEGROUT FRAME TO 4 INCHES FROM TOPLADDER RUNGS @ 12" O.C.WELDED WIRE FABRIC (6 X 6 WWF)OR AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAINSTRUCTURAL INTEGRITYFLEXIBLE RUBBER BOOT#4 BARS, 12" O.C., BOTH WAYSOR AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAINSTRUCTURAL INTEGRITYUNDISTURBED SOIL5"8"15" 6"18"36"B12"MIN.12"MIN.SW-0131/2" = 1'LAST REVISED 04/21/20142014 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSGRASS CHANNEL3113CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS:1. SIDE SLOPES FOR GRASS CHANNELS SHALL NOT EXCEED 2:1.2. ALL CHANNELS SHALL BE SEEDED & STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROLBLANKET (ECB). SEED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ECB, FOLLOWMANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. TYPE OF ECB TO BE USED IS BASED ONLONGITUDINAL SLOPE.<5%: NA GREEN SC150 (OR APPROVED EQUAL)5% - 20%: NA GREEN C125BN (OR APPROVED EQUAL)>20%: NA GREEN P550 (OR APPROVED EQUAL)VARIES2' MIN.VARIES24" MIN.VARIESSTORMWATER INFILTRATION GALLERY DETAIL1/4" = 1'15" HDPE15" HDPE15" HDPE15" HDPE STORMWATER OUTLETSTRUCTURESEE DETAIL THIS SHEET1/2" = 1'OUTLET STRUCTURE DETAILELEV.=313.505.5" DIAMETERCONTROL ORIFICEELEV.=309.25FROM STORMWATERCHAMBERSTO OUTLETOVERFLOWELEV.=312.00HEAVY DUTY FRAME & LID LABELED "DRAIN"NEENAH R-1649 OR LEBARON LC 266GROUT FRAME TO 4 INCHES FROM TOP60" PRECASTCONCRETE MANHOLE15" HDPE15" HDPE12" GRAVEL OR 1" STONE FOR SUB-BASEOR AS REQUIRED BY ENGINEER IF WETAND OR UNSTABLE CONDITIONS EXIST.UNDISTURBED SOILSTORMWATER INFILTRATION GALLERY SECTIONNTSCHAMBER4" PVCSCREW-INPVC CAPFLOOR BOX FRAME AND LIDWITH STAINLESS STEEL CAPSCREW LID CLOSUREINSPECTION PORT DETAILNOTE: DESIGNS PER STORMTECH, OR APPROVED EQUALNTS15" HDPE26.25'55'23'7'256.25'5.25'14.75'TO STORMWATEROUTFALL12"12"12"12"12"12"12"6"6"12"ELEV=309.00ELEV=308.5012" MIN.NATIVE MATERIAL (DO NOT RUN EQUIPMENT ON SOILSUNTIL AFTER CHAMBERS ARE INSTALLED AND CLEANCRUSHED STONE FILL IS PLACED)ADS 601 NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE (ORAPPROVED EQUAL) ALL AROUND CLEANCRUSHED STONE6"ISOLATOR ROW - TWO LAYERS OF AASHTOM288 CLASS 2 NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILEAROUND PRIMARY INLET CHAMBER12" MIN.GRANULAR, WELL-GRADED SOILAGGREGATE MIX, 35% FINESCOMPACTED IN 12" LIFTS WITH MIN.6" TOPSOIL12" MIN.NOMINAL 3/4"-2" CLEANCRUSHED ANGULAR STONEELEV=313.00 (MIN.)ELEV=312.00FINISH GRADESTORMTECH MC-3500 CHAMBER OR APPROVED EQUALINSPECTION PORT (TYP.)3/4" TO 2" CLEAN,CRUSHED ANGULAR STONE6"12"12"OBSERVATION PORT(TYPICAL)SEE DETAIL THIS SHEETNOTE:ALL INTERIOR PIPING TO BE15" HDPE AND LAID LEVELWITH INVERT ELEVATIONi=309.75i=309.75ISOLATOR ROW - TWO LAYERS OF AASHTOM288 CLASS 2 NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILEAROUND PRIMARY INLET CHAMBER109/29/14 DABAdd Isolator Row to StormwaterInfiltration Galery DetailFROM DMH 1DMH 2i=309.75i=309.75i=309.75i=309.755'15" HDPE15" HDPE15" HDPE15" HDPE15" TEECAP307.75212/22/14 SMMInfiltration/Outlet Structure DetailsSW-023LAST REVISED 04/24/20142014 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSNON ROOFTOP DISCONNECTION DETAIL5'5'5% MAX.IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (TYPICAL)SEE SITE PLAN FOR DIMENSIONSSLOPE VARIES, SEE SITEPLANSLOPE VARIES, SEE SITEPLANVEGETATEDSURFACENOTES:1. MAXIMUM CONTRIBUTING IMPERVIOUS LENGTH TO FILTER STRIP SHALL BE 75 FEET2. RUNOFF SHALL NOT COME FROM A "HOTSPOT" LANDUSE (E.G. GAS STATION PARKING LOT)3. THE SURFACE IMPERVIOUS AREA TO ANY ONE DISCHARGE LOCATION CANNOT EXCEED 1,000 SF 12-052¬Sheet TitleProject TitleUse of These Drawings1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended forpreliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines orutilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities.¬They are not intended as construction drawings unless notedas such.2. Only drawings specifically marked “For Construction” areintended to be used in conjunction with contractdocuments, specifications, owner/contractor agreementsand to be fully coordinated with other disciplines, includingbut not limited to, the Architect, if applicable.¬ TheseDrawings shall not be used for construction layout. ContactTCE for any construction surveying services or to obtainelectronic data suitable for construction layout.3. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are nottransferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, andcopies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property.¬Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. Iferrors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought tothe attention of TCE immediately.4. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project,the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved,and accepted the drawings and have met with allapplicable parties/disciplines to insure these plans areproperly coordinated with other aspects of the Project.¬ TheOwner and Architect, are responsible for any buildingsshown, including an area measured a minimum five (5) feetaround any building.¬5. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains themost current revisions.Project Reference:Scale:Project Number:Date:Drawn By:Project Engineer:Approved By:No. Description Date ByRevisions478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COMTRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSField Book:HalvorsenDevelopmentSouth Burlington, VTLandscaping PlanL1-011" = 20'14-091NPCSMM¬¬0FeetGraphic Scale20 20 40 60 80PLANT LISTNOTES:1. PARKING AREA AND DRIVE 27,000 SFLANDSCAPE ISLANDS ¬2,700 SF (10%) - 10 % REQUIRED57 PARKING SPACES, INCLUDING 4 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES - 3REQUIRED12 DECIDUOUS TREES WITHIN OR NEAR PERIMETER OF PARKING AREAS ¬-11 REQUIRED2. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO A DEPTH OF 3' OR DEPTHOF LARGEST ROOT BALL, WHICHEVER IS DEEPER.BACKFILL WITH BLEND OF CLEAN FILL AND ORGANIC MATERIAL ASAPPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.NO COARSE GRAVEL OR PAVEMENT BASE MATERIAL SHALL BE USED ASBACKFILL IN PLANTING AREAS.LANDSCAPING NARRATIVE:THE CONCEPT FOR THE LANDSCAPING PLAN AROUND THE RECONSTRUCTEDBUILDING INCLUDES THE GENERATION OF A NUMBER LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ADJACENTTO THE BUILDING AND PARKING LOT WHERE LITTLE LANDSCAPING CURRENTLY EXISTS.PLANTS SPECIES ARE SELECTED TO PROVIDE BOTH A VISUAL BUFFER FOR THE PARKINGAREA, TO ADD TO THE VISUAL INTEREST OF THE SITE AND COMPLIMENT THE BUILDINGARCHITECTURE. THE PROPOSED PLANTS INCLUDE A MIX OF DECIDUOUS ANDEVERGREENS VEGETATION, INCLUDING DECIDUOUS SHADE TREES AND SHRUBS,EVERGREEN SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER, PERENNIAL PLANTS AND GRASSES. INADDITION TO THEIR SELECTION FOR VISUAL INTEREST, DIVERSITY AND SHADE, ONLYSALT TOLERANT PLANTS ARE BEING PROPOSED.THERE ARE A NUMBER OF TREES ADJACENT TO THE SITE, THAT ARE PRESENT ALONG THEHIGHWAY EXIT RAMP AND ALONG BOTH WILLISTON RD. AND DORSET ST., WHICHHAVE BEEN PLANTED AS PART OF RECENT ROAD IMPROVEMENTS. TREES BEINGPLACED AT THE PERIMETER OF THE PARKING AREA ARE INTENDED TO COMPLEMENTTHE EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN. IN ADDITION, EMPHASIS HAS BEEN PLACEDON SCREENING BUILT ELEMENTS IN THE IHO OVERLAY DISTRICT FROM THE INTERSTATE.THE LANDSCAPING THAT IS OCCURRING AROUND THE EXISTING BUILDING WILL BEREMOVED WHEN THE BUILDING IS DEMOLISHED AND REPLACED WITH PLANTS SHOWNON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN, INSTALLED IN A COHESIVE MANNER WITH SIZES ANDQUANTITIES APPROPRIATE FOR THE SITE'S SCALE.08/22/14L-001LAST REVISED 03/15/20132013 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSTREE PLANTING DETAIL4" SAUCER RIMBACKFILL WITH EXCAVATEDMATERIAL. IF SOIL ISPREDOMINATELYCLAY OR GRAVELINCORPORATEORGANIC MATERIAL ASDIRECTED AND APPROVEDBY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTPLANT PIT WIDTH3X BALL DIA.NOTES:* STAKE ONLY IN EXTREMELY WINDY CONDITIONS AS APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT * IF KNOWN, PLANT THIN BARKED TREES WITH THE SAME SUN ORIENTATION OR WRAP WITH WHITE POLYPROPYLENE WRAP * BURLAP: LOOSEN, CUT, & REMOVE NATURAL BURLAP FROM TOP 1/2 OF ROOT BALL. REMOVE SYNTHETIC BURLAP * WIRE BASKETS: CUT AWAY BOTTOM RINGS. PARTIALLY BACKFILL THEN REMOVE REMAINING WIRE. * PLANT TREE TO EXPOSE ROOT FLARE, MAIN ORDER ROOT, AND IN SAME ORIENTATION AS TREE WAS GROWN. DO NOT PLANT TOO DEEP * 3" LAYER SHREDDED BARK MULCH (TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) OVER PERMEABLE WEED FABRIC. DO NOT PLACE NEXT TO TREE TRUNK6" CLEARANCE2' DIA.MULCH RINGSLOPE GROUNDTO DRAINDIG TREE PIT ONLY ASDEEP AS ROOT BALLL-002LAST REVISED 03/15/20132013 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERSBALL AND BURLAP SHRUBFROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL*LOOSEN, CUT, & REMOVE BURLAPCONTINUOUS WHEN USED IN BEDS.WEED BARRIER FABRIC TO BE*SHREDDED BARK MULCH ANDGROWNWHICH SHRUB HAD PREVIOUSLY*PLANT SHRUB AT SAME DEPTH ATARCHITECT) OVER PERMEABLE WEED(TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE3" LAYER SHREDDED BARK MULCH3" SAUCER RIMFABRIC. DO NOT PLACE CLOSE TOMAIN STEM.PLANT PIT WIDTH 3XBALL DIA.NOTES:BACKFILL WITH EXCAVATEDMATERIAL. IF SOIL IS PREDOMINATELYCLAY OR GRAVEL INCORPORATEORGANIC MATERIAL AS DIRECTEDAND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPEARCHITECT1BJO09/29/14Add Plantings &Update Plant List2BJO11/18/14Update Plantings &Plant ListKEY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE COMMENTSAFAcer x freemaniiAutumn Blaze Maple 5 2 1/2"-3" B&B 'Autumn Blaze'GTI Gleditsia triacanthosImperial Honeylocust 4 2 1/2"-3" B&B 'Imperial'NYSNyssa sylvaticaBlack Tupelo 4 2 1/2"-3" B&BSRSyringa reticulataIvory Silk 2 2 1/2"-3" B&B 'Ivory Silk' Japanese Tree LilacAMAronia melanocarpaAutumn Magic Chokeberry 7 5 gal. CONT. 'Autumn Magic'CARClethra alnifolia Red Summersweet 39 3 gal. CONT. 'Ruby Spice'IGSIlex glabra 'Densa'Inkberry 105 3 gal. CONT.IVIlex verticillata Jim Dandy & Berry Nice 20 5 gal. CONT. 'Jim Dandy & Berry Nice' WinterberryPFPotentilla fruiticosaGoldstar Cinquefoil 18 3 gal. CONT. 'Goldstar'PMTPotentilla fruiticosaMango Tango Potentilla 24 3 gal. CONT. 'Mango Tango'POPhysocarpus opulifoliusRed Leaf Ninebark 11 5 gal. CONT. 'Diablo'RHARhus aromatica 'Gro-Low'Dwarf Fragrant Sumac 23 3 gal. CONT.RPJMRhododrendron PJMPJM Rhododendron 12 5 gal. CONT.SMPSyringa meyeri 'Palibin'Dwarf Korean Lilac 10 7 gal. CONT.AA'SECTION A-A'SEE DETAIL SHEET C8-013BJO03/06/14Update Plantings &Plant List xFOEXI STI NGSI DEWALKFFE=315.70* Z = LUMINAIRE MOUNTING HEIGHT A.F.G.*HUBBELL IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERFORMANCEOF LUMINAIRE MANUFACTURED BY OTHERSNOT TO SCALECORNICE DETAILFOR PRICING CONTACTNESCO40 Hudson RdCanton, MA 02021Tel: 781-828-9494Fax: 781-575-1398E-Mail: CVSplans@nescoweb.comPOLE SPEC FOR CIMARRON:SINGLE FIXTURESSS-XX-XX-X-A2-XXTWIN FIXTURE 180 DEGREE APARTSSS-XX-XX-X-C2-XX*****GREENVILLE, SC29607Graphic Scale01. THIS LIGHTING DESIGN IS BASED ON LIMITED INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY OTHERS TO HUBBELL LIGHTING. SITE DETAILS PROVIDED HEREON ARE REPRODUCED ONLY AS A VISUALIZATION AID. FIELD DEVIATIONS MAY SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECT PREDICTEDPERFORMANCE. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, CRITICAL SITE INFORMATION (POLE LOCATIONS, ORIENTATION, MOUNTING HEIGHT, ETC.) SHOULD BE COORDINATED WITH THE CONTRACTOR AND/OR SPECIFIER RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROJECT.2. LUMINAIRE DATA IS TESTED TO INDUSTRY STANDARDS UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS. OPERATING VOLTAGE AND NORMAL MANUFACTURING TOLERANCES OF LAMP, BALLAST, AND LUMINAIRE MAY AFFECT FIELD RESULTS.3. CONFORMANCE TO FACILITY CODE AND OTHER LOCAL REQUIREMENTS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER AND/OR THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.ADCNORTHPLANRREVISED FROM DRAWING NUMBER(S):DRAWING NO.SCALEDATEAP'VDDW'NTITLEANGLE(S)REFERENCEHUBBELLHubbell Lighting, Inc.701 MILLENNIUM BLVD180 02709/23/2014NOT A CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT - FOR DESIGN PURPOSES ONLYX0,0Y40 20 40 801" = 40'CVS #10690SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT147124114716531CD23D90D904OC5OC67OCOC8OC9S210S411S61213S614S615S6S61617S618S6S61920S621S622S6S62324S60.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.7 0.9 1.2 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.7 1.5 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.8 1.2 1.9 1.4 1.6 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.0 1.3 1.7 2.0 1.9 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.1 1.7 2.2 2.4 2.5 2.0 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.2 2.3 1.7 1.2 0.9 1.1 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.2 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 1.6 2.5 3.3 3.2 2.6 2.3 2.2 2.4 3.0 2.8 2.2 1.7 1.4 1.6 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.2 1.6 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.3 2.3 2.9 3.0 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.9 2.9 2.6 2.1 1.9 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.1 1.6 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.0 2.0 2.7 2.5 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.5 3.0 2.9 2.7 2.0 1.9 2.0 2.3 2.7 2.6 2.1 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.7 2.1 2.1 1.8 1.7 1.8 2.5 2.9 3.0 2.6 1.9 1.6 1.7 2.2 2.7 2.6 2.1 1.4 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.4 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.7 1.7 2.4 2.9 3.0 2.5 2.1 1.6 1.7 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.0 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.8 1.3 1.8 1.9 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.4 2.9 3.1 2.8 2.0 1.7 1.8 2.2 2.7 2.7 2.2 1.7 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.0 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.8 1.3 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.9 2.2 2.5 3.0 3.1 2.9 2.3 2.1 2.2 2.4 2.8 2.6 2.2 1.8 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.8 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.8 2.4 3.1 3.5 3.2 2.6 2.2 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.2 1.7 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.6 2.8 3.6 3.9 3.5 3.1 2.6 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.2 1.6 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8 2.0 5.5 6.2 6.4 6.3 6.0 5.2 2.0 1.7 1.6 1.8 3.0 5.0 4.2 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.6 3.2 18.3 18.8 18.9 19.0 18.7 18.0 23.5 32.5 32.8 33.3 16.3 17.9 16.6 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.10.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Luminaire ScheduleLuminaire Location SummaryLumNoLabelXYZOrientCalculation SummaryTilt1C45618428332.1030SymbolLabelQtyDescription2D65422028180LabelDescription03D9059122828900UnitsAvgMaxMinAvg/MinArrangementLum. WattsLum. Lumens4Max/MinCVS PARKING1.0 FC MINIMUMFcLMFLDDBFLLFD905162212.3628005OC59929210.59006OC60729210.5900C1CL1-60L-4K-4-BC (Hubbell Ltg)SINGLE140.396567OC6152920.9500.9501.00010.59008OC6230.9032926.40.82.958.0010.59009OC63129210.590010S2529.839D1CL1-60L-4K-5M (Hubbell Ltg)SINGLE140.8120380.9500.9501.0000.903D902CL1-90L-4K-5M (Hubbell Ltg)SINGLE207.8185220.9500.9501.0000.903OC5EVO 41/29 8AR 120SINGLE48.931080.9500.9501.0000.903S21ECVLXWET-2-120-4K-2780GROUPN.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.0.903S41ECVLXWET-4-120-4K-2780GROUPN.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.0.903S613ECVLXWET-6-120-4K-2780GROUPN.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.0.903295.11113.660011S4657.569295.09213.660012S6587.844295.09313.660013S6640.573295.09213.660014S6581.844295.09313.660015S6575.844295.09313.660016S6569.844295.09313.660017S6563.844295.09313.660018S6557.844295.09313.660019S6551.844295.09313.660020S6545.844295.09313.660021S6539.844295.09313.660022S6533.844295.09313.660023S6646.573295.09213.660024S6652.573295.09213.6600CVS PAR K I N G 1.0 FC M I N I M U M Illuminan c e ( F c ) Average = 2 . 3 6 Maximum = 6.4Minimum = 0.8Avg/Min Ratio = 2.95Max/Min Ratio = 8.00.5.5.6.8.8.91.01.11.52.02.1Existing LightExisting LightExistingMeasuredLight LevelsAt PropertyLine(Typical)10-23-14 MEASURED LIGHT LEVELS BKA Architects, Inc.A r c h i t e c t u r e + I n t e r i o r s142 Crescent Street Brockton, MA 02302t: 508.583.5603 f: 508.584.2914PROJECT NO:DRAWN BY:12 JANUARY 2015SCALE:C V S / p h a r m a c yKLPNO SCALESheet 1S. B U R L I N G T O N, V T212166Perspective View TTTTTTTFOFOFOFOFOFOVanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.\\vhb\proj\Bedford\52076.25\cad\ld\Concepts\SP-1\Halverson Emergency Vehicle Movement REV FINAL PLAT.dwgREV 2/12/15Exhibit 1South Burlington, VTOne Dorset StreetProposed CVSEmergency Vehicle Movements01530Feet