The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda 08_SD-23-05_760 Shelburne Road_Bourne 180 Market Street, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 | 802-846-4106 | www.southburlingtonvt.gov TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Marla Keene, Development Review Planner SUBJECT: #SD-23-05 760 Shelburne Road DATE: July 18, 2023 Development Review Board meeting PROJECT DESCRIPTION Preliminary and final plat application #SD-23-05 of Gary Bourne to create a General Planned Unit Development by re-subdividing three existing lots into three new lots of 0.18 acres (Lot 1), 0.14 acres (Lot 2), and 1.06 acres (Lot 3), and constructing a 3,350 sf financial institution on Lot 1, a 6,480 sf 2-story mixed commercial and residential building on Lot 2, and a 3-story 27-unit multifamily building on Lot 3, 760 Shelburne Road. COMMENTS The Board reviewed this application on March 7, April 4, and June 6, 2023. The Board continued the hearing for the purpose of allowing the applicant to address Board feedback, particularly on the architecture of the proposed financial institution on Lot 1. The applicant provided supplemental materials to resolve some issues discussed on June 6. Staff has included in this memo a review of subject areas for which the applicant has submitted revised materials, as well as areas where Staff expected revised materials but none were submitted. As noted in previous staff reports, the applicant has requested modification or waiver for each dimensional standard as well as a number of other modifications. The Board must only grant a modification for cause, and the modification must result in better compliance with the objectives of the LDR, both those specific to the standard requested to be modified and to the overall LDR objectives. A) ZONING DISTRICT AND DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS The project is located in the Commercial 1 zoning district, which is intended to be a “higher-intensity residential, retail, office, and vertically mixed uses in a manner that serves as or enhances a compact central business area.” It is also located within an urban design overlay node, whose purpose statement includes that it “will serve as important connections, gateways, or areas of activity. As such, a more urban form is desired and, where noted, required and permitted.“ At the June 6 meeting, the applicant presented updates to a few dimensional standards, which are now included in the updated table below. 2 Commercial 1-R15 Zoning District Required Proposed Lot 1 Proposed Lot 2 Proposed Lot 3 Proposed Overall @ Min. Lot Size 40,000 sq. ft. 8,054 sq. ft. 6,287 sq. ft. 46,359 sq. ft. 60,700 sq. ft @ Max. Building Coverage 40 % 41.6% 51.5% 22.9% 28.4% @ Max. Overall Coverage 70 % 63.2% 77.6% 76.8% 75.1% @ Min. Front Setback, Urban Design Overlay 20 ft. 10 ft. 13 ft. 73 ft. N/A @ Min. Side Setback 10 ft. 7.4 ft. 9.9 ft. 10.7 ft N/A @ Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. N/A 10 ft. N/A N/A @ Max. Front Setback Coverage, Shelburne Road 30% 0% 4% 44% 40.3% @ Max. Front Setback Coverage, Swift St 30% 0% N/A 37.6% 53.1% @ Max. Height 5 stories max, Appearance of 2 stories min 1 story 2 stories 3 stories N/A √ Zoning Compliance @ Modification or Waiver Requested Updated information from the last time this table was presented include lot coverage and front setback coverage. The applicant is proposing to increase lot coverage above the maximum allowable in the zoning district through the use of additional on-site open/civic space in 10.05E. 10.05 Urban Design Overlay District (UDO) (2) Glazing. Windows are key to the overall design of a building and the relationship between its exterior and interior. (a) For all properties in the Urban Overlay District, a minimum of 75% of glazing shall be transparent. On June 6, the applicant presented a design for the building on Lot 1 in which 60% of the glazing facing Shelburne Road was transparent. The Board’s feedback was that the spandrel glass detracted from the appearance of the building. The applicant appears to have removed the spandrel (opaque) glass from the façade, though they have not submitted revised floor plans and the current elevations are not consistent with the previously-submitted floor plans. Staff recommends, if the Board approves the project, the Board require the applicant to submit revised floor plans consistent with the elevations dated 6/29/2023. 3 (3) Dimensional Standards Height Minimum (Maximums per underlying zoning district) Glazing Features Setback from ROW Designated Secondary Node Appearance of two stories. Buildings with a GFA of less than 6,000 SF may be one story. First stories shall have a minimum of 60% glazing across the width of the building facade on primary street; 40% minimum glazing across width of the façade facing the secondary street. Must have significant architectural feature at corner of corner building. Minimum 20 feet 1. On June 6, the Board directed the applicant to modify the building on Lot 1 to have the appearance of two stories. The applicant has made modifications. Staff recommends the Board review the revised elevations and the site as a whole and provide feedback on whether they consider the dimensional requirements of the Urban Design Overlay to have been met. Phasing The project is proposed to be constructed in three phases. The first phase includes the buildings along Shelburne Road and the base course of the site drive including the connection to Swift Street. The multifamily building is the second phase. The third and final proposed phase includes the finish coat of pavement on the driveway. In a phased project in general, the applicant must obtain a certificate of occupancy for each phase prior to use of that phase. Since there is nothing to “occupy” with the applicant’s proposed phase three, Staff considers there would be no incentive for the applicant to complete it. Staff recommends the Board either require the applicant to reduce the project to two phases, thus requiring completion of the final coat of pavement before occupancy of the second building, or require provision of a bond of the cost of phase 3 prior to issuance of a zoning permit for phase 2. Staff considers the option where phases 2 and 3 are combined to be preferred since the City does not have established protocols for constructing on private property when an applicant fails to complete their obligations. On June 6, the Board asked the applicant to demonstrate that site amenity, bike parking, and landscaping requirements are met on a phase by phase basis. Site Amenity The required site amenity is calculated as follows. Required Provided Phase 1 6,590 sf non-residential x 6% = 396 sf 3 units x 100 sf / unit = 300 sf 890 sf snippet Phase 2 27 units x 60 sf / unit = 1,620 sf 3,110 additional sf lot coverage in Urban Design Overlay = 933 sf 1,840 sf snippet 1,900 sf snippet Total 3,249 sf 4,630 sf 4 Landscaping The required landscaping is calculated as follows. Required Provided Phase 1 $51,500 $60,099 Phase 1 + 2 $123, 500 $184,720 Provided landscaping includes hardscape elements of benches and sculptures. Bicycle Parking The required bicycle parking is calculated as follows. Required Long- Term Parking Provided Long-Term Parking Required Short-Term Parking Provided Short-Term Parking Phase 1 4 42 8 43 Phase 2 27 27 4 8 Total 31 31 12 12 2. Two of the long-term bicycle parking spaces in Phase 1 are located within an interior room within the proposed bank building. Users of the racks would have to pass through what appears to be the employee break room with their bicycles in order to use the racks. While the LDRs provide limited detail on the location of long-term bicycle parking, Staff considers the location to be less than ideal and considers a more accessible location would be one way the applicant could improve the project in light of the modifications they are requesting as a PUD. 3. Bicycle racks serving lots 1 and 2 are located just beyond the Lots 1 and 2 property lines on Lot 3. Since the project is proposed as a PUD, Staff recommends that the Board allow off-site bicycle racks to count towards the required minimum. However, the bike racks serving Lots 1 and 2 do not provide the minimum for those lots (8 spaces required, 4 provided). Staff recommends the Board require the Phase 1 bicycle parking areas to be expanded to permit parking of four bicycles each (two racks each) so that bicycle parking requirements are met on a phase by phase basis. Staff considers this can be addressed as a condition of approval. Residential Density and 18.01 Inclusionary Zoning The Board has provided feedback to the applicant that in order to construct 30 units total (10 over the base zoning density unit-maximum), the applicant must provide for 10 of their base zoning density unit- maximum to be inclusionary. Based on the most current versions of application materials, the applicant is only proposing five (5) inclusionary units, though they have stated they consider the LDR to require seven (7) inclusionary units. As noted at previous meetings, the applicant may also use Transferable Development Rights for one or more units. The applicant also has the option to make some of the inclusionary units 3 or 4 bedroom units, which count towards more than 1 of the required inclusionary in order to attain the desired bonus. The applicant has submitted a second letter arguing that the Board’s interpretation is incorrect, included in the packet for the Board. The Board may deliberate and issue its decision which may include conditions pertaining to required inclusionary covenants and documentation. 5 B) SITE PLAN REVIEW 14.07 Specific Review Standards In all Zoning Districts and the City Center Form Based Codes District, the following standards shall apply: H. Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire-served utility lines and service connections shall be underground insofar as feasible and subject to state public utilities regulations. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Standards of Section 15.A.18, Infrastructure, Utilities, and Services, shall also be met. Staff provided the plans updated 6/26/2023 to the South Burlington Water District, which indicated on 7/3/2023 the following comments still need to be addressed. Many of these comments are unchanged from previously rounds of comments provided by the Water District. While these comments are extensive, Staff considers they do not affect the appearance of the project and are sufficiently specific that they can be included as conditions of approval. It is the responsibility of the contractor to be familiar with the CWD Specifications beyond what is included in this information. The Champlain Water District Specifications and Detail for the Installation of Water Lines and Appurtenances information can be found at www.champlainwater.org Plan Specific Comments Sheet C3-01. (See sheet C3-01) 1. The proposed eight-inch (8”) tee shall include a main line gate valve on either side of the new tee to be cut-in, secured to the tee with Foster Adapters; total three (3) eight-inch gate valves. This must be shown on the plans. The cut-in of this tee shall require a shutdown on the only line supplying the northern part of the City so must be scheduled for night work. At least three weeks’ notice must be provided to the SBWD so all affected customers can be notified in advance of the water service interruption. 2. Include a tracing wire box near tee per CWD Specifications. 3. A six-inch (6”) valve on the line supplying the Multi-family Residential 27DU building shall be secured to the hydrant tee. Add a tracing wire box to this tee, per CWD Specifications. 4. Place the 1.5” curb box inside a gate valve box top when located in concrete or asphalt surface areas. Include a minimum 1” paving riser. 5. Locate and abandon all three existing water services at the corporations. Close the corporations, disconnect the service lines, and wrap the service taps in V-Bio polyurethane. 6. The services to all of the proposed buildings shall be copper and DI if petroleum infused soils are encountered. See VT Water Supply Rule requirements. 7. Install 6” gate valve on FS line to 27 DU Multifamily Residential building. Add tracing wire box per CWD Specifications. 8. See CWD Specifications for tracing wire requirements for all PVC water pipe. Sheet C8-04 1. Water Details must be those found in the CWD Specifications. The Department will not accept any pipe or material that is not in compliance with the CWD Specifications. There are too many discrepancies to list here between Sheet C8-04 Water Details and the CWD Specifications. 6 C) SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS 13.05 Stormwater Management Stormwater standards apply when one-half acre or more of impervious surface exists or is proposed to exist, and where 5,000 sf of impervious is created or reconstructed. The City Stormwater Section reviewed the plans and provided comments on 3/2/2023. The City Stormwater Section offers the following comments on the revised plans received 5/23/2023. 1. The swale conveying water to Bioretention 7 terminates in a 9-foot vertical drop over the top of the retaining wall into the bioretention. Please provide an appropriate inlet for water conveyed to the bioretention from the swale. On June 6, the Board asked the applicant to address this comment. The applicant indicated they would add a yard drain. The plans have not been revised. Staff considers stormwater to be an area for which the applicant has not sufficiently addressed the comments of the Board. 4. Staff recommends the Board confirm the applicant does not propose to make any changes to this aspect of the plans. 13.07 Exterior Lighting Specific requirements for maximum illumination levels are included in Appendix A and are limited to 3 footcandles average at ground level and 0.3 footcandles at the property line. The June 6 Staff report recommended reducing lighting on the southern side of the property to reduce excess spillover to 0.3 footcandles maximum, and reducing peak illumination levels to a more reasonable level, on the order of 8 to 10 footcandles. The applicant testified on June 6 that the parking lot lighting on the southern side of the site also illuminates the adjacent property. Staff considers without a joint application, there is no nexus for this project to illuminate an adjacent property. Illumination levels beyond the southern property line are up to 1 footcandle. However, the more concerning area of illumination is the rear (east) entrance to the bank building, which is proposed to have illumination levels in excess of 19 footcandles. Staff considers lighting to be an area for which the applicant has not sufficiently addressed the comments of the Board. 5. Staff recommends the Board confirm the applicant does not propose to make any changes to this aspect of the plans. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board discuss the remaining issues with the applicant and close the hearing. Nichiha Panel (Ash)Nichiha Panel (Bark)Black Anodized Mullions ACM Panels Chase SilverChiseled Limestone (Cream) 760 & 764 SHELBURNE RD. & 31 SWIFT ST. SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT SHELBURNE & SWIFT Engineer & Landscape Architect: TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 478 BLAIR PARK ROAD WILLISTON, VT 05495 (802) 879-6331 Owner/Applicant: GARY BOURNE 414 WEST GROVE MIDDLEBORO, MA 02346 (508) 735-4970 DRAWING INDEX Architect: RABIDEAU ARCHITECTS 550 HINESBURG ROAD SUITE 101 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO REDEVELOP THE FORMER GAS STATION AND RESTAURANT SITE AND CONSTRUCT A MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING, COMMERCIAL AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTION SPACES. THE PROJECT WILL UTILIZE MUNICIPAL WATER AND SEWER. " LOCAL PERMITTING" SUBMISSION SET (NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION) 478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COM TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS TCE PROJECT NO: 22-523 06/26/2023 ISSUED FOR PERMITTINGLAST REVISED: USE AND INTERPRETATION OF THE DRAWINGS BEFORE USING THESE PLANS ENSURE THAT YOU HAVE THE LATEST REVISION 1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended for preliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines or utilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities. They are not intended as construction drawings unless noted as such or marked approved by a regulatory authority. 2. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project, the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved, and accepted the drawings, obtained all necessary permits, and have met with all applicable parties/disciplines, including but not limited to, the Engineer and the Architect, to insure these plans are properly coordinated including, but not limited to, contract documents, specifications, owner/contractor agreements, building and mechanical plans, private and public utilities, and other pertinent permits for construction. 3. Owner and Architect are responsible for final design and location of buildings shown, including an area measured a minimum five (5) feet around any building and coordinating final utility connections shown on these plans. 4. Prior to using these plans for construction layout, the user shall contact TCE to ensure the plan contains the most current revisions. 5. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are not transferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, and copies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property. Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. If errors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought to the attention of TCE immediately. 6. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains the most current revisions. If unsure, please contact TCE. PERMIT DESCRIPTION: FINAL PLAT TAX ID: PARCEL ID: 1540-00760 SPAN: 600-188-10694 PROJECT LOCATION C0-00 Cover C1-00 Legend & Notes C1-01 Existing Conditions Plan C1-02 Demolition & EPSC Plan C2-00 Overall Site Plan C2-01 Layout & Materials C2-02 Grading Plan C3-01 Utility Plan C4-01 Existing Stormwater Plan C4-02 Proposed Stormwater Plan C8-01 Site Details C8-02 Site Details C8-03 Site Details C8-04 Water Details C8-05 Sanitary Details C8-06 Storm Details C8-07 Storm Details C8-08 EPSC Details C8-09 EPSC Handbook Page 1 C8-10 EPSC Handbook Page 2 C8-11 ATM Details C8-12 ATM Details C8-13 ATM Details LA-1.0 Landscape Plan LA-2.0 Landscape Details LA-2.1 Site Details S1-01 Plat LI-01 Lighting Plan No. 8917 CIVILJENNIFER ANN DESA UT E LSSTA TE O F VER M ONT PROF ESSIONAL E N G INEERLICEN S E D C2-03 Phasing Plan DDDDDDOH OH OH 21 3 214 2 1 6 217213214212211215216214 2 1 2 213 21 1 216217213215212210214213211212210210212211213215217216214208209218219210211213212216214218217210209209210211212208SBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SBSBSBSB SBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSB10 ' 1-STORY BUILDING 1-STORY BUILDING SHELBURNE ROAD (U.S. ROUTE 7)SWIFT STREET D D D D D D D D DDD D D D D 1-STORY BUILDINGWWWWWWWWWWWW W W W W W W W W W CROSSWALK SIGNAL POLE LEGAL LOAD LIMIT SIGN GUPUPUPUPUPUGUGUGUG FINANCIAL INSTITUTION ±3,350 SF 14 7 S P E E D TA B L E ATM LANE 13 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL 27 DU FFE 217.0 BFE 207.0 GARAGE ENTRANCE D D MIXED USE ± 3,240 SF 1ST FLOOR: COMMERCIAL 2ND FLOOR: 3 DU FFE 212.0 FFE 212.0 1,840 SF SITE AMENITY SPACE (SNIPPET PARK) 890 SF SITE AMENITY SPACE (SNIPPET PARK)210209211212211210209208213214216 21 5213 2 1 1 212209 210 211211 210212213213215 216 215216216.5 21721521621 4 21821821721 5209206205.521221 3 DEDICATED PARKING FOR COMMERCIAL USES ONLY DURING BUSINESS HOURS 2162102112091,900 SF SITE AMENITY SPACE Sheet Title Project Title Use of These Drawings Scale: Project Number: Date: Drawn By: Project Engineer: Approved By: No. Description Date By Revisions 478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COM E N G I N E E R I N G S U R V E Y No. 8917 CIVILP ROF E SSIONAL E N G INEERLICEN S E DJENNIFER ANN DESA U T E LSSTA TE O F VER M ONTField Book: For Local Permitting Only 1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended for preliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines or utilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities. They are not intended as construction drawings unless noted as such or marked approved by a regulatory authority. 2. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project, the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved, and accepted the drawings, obtained all necessary permits, and have met with all applicable parties/disciplines, including but not limited to, the Engineer and the Architect, to insure these plans are properly coordinated including, but not limited to, contract documents, specifications, owner/contractor agreements, building and mechanical plans, private and public utilities, and other pertinent permits for construction. 3. Owner and Architect, are responsible for final design and location of buildings shown, including an area measured a minimum five (5) feet around any building and coordinating final utility connections shown on these plans. 4. Prior to using these plans for construction layout, the user shall contact TCE to ensure the plan contains the most current revisions. 5. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are not transferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, and copies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property. Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. If errors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought to the attention of TCE immediately. 6. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains the most current revisions. PLANNIN G ENVIRON MENTAL 1 02/09/2023 JADPlan RevisionsPROJECT LOCATION 0 Feet Graphic Scale 20 40 60 15°±VT GridMagnetic PARCEL ID: 1540-00760 SPAN: 600-188-10694 Overall Site Plan C2-00 01/20/2023 1" = 20' 22-523 PJM CMJ JAD Shelburne & Swift 760 & 764 Shelburne Rd. & 31 Swift St. South Burlington, VT ZONING DISTRICT INFORMATION: ZONING DISTRICT:C1 R15 OVERLAY DISTRICT:URBAN DESIGN (UDO)/PRIMARY NODE TRANSIT DISTRICT TRAFFIC DISTRICT / ZONE 1 SETBACKS FRONT YARD:30 FT (COMMERCIAL 1) FRONT YARD:10 FT (PROPOSED PUD) SIDE YARD:10 FT REAR YARD:30 FT - N/A - CORNER LOT LOT COVERAGE:70% MAX. BLDG COVERAGE:40% MAX. LOT SIZE:40,000 SF MIN. HEIGHT REQ'S:2 STORIES MIN. PLAN INFORMATION: EXISTING 760 SHELBURNE ROAD LOT SIZE: 17,553 SF / 0.4 AC BUILDING COVERAGE: 4,229 SF / 0.1 AC OR 24.1% TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: 14,901 SF / 0.34 AC OR 84.9% FRONT YARD: SHELBURNE RD: 1,113 SF / 0.03 AC OR 90.3% SWIFT ST: 1,127 SF/ 0.03 AC OR 88.0% 764 SHELBURNE ROAD LOT SIZE: 26,572 SF / 0.61 AC BUILDING COVERAGE: 2,812 SF / 0.06 AC OR 10.6% TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: 19,914 SF / 0.46 AC OR 74.9% FRONT YARD (SHELBURNE): 431 SF / 0.01 AC OR 43.3% 31 SWIFT STREET LOT SIZE: 16,575 SF / 0.38 AC BUILDING COVERAGE: 6,157 SF / 0.14 AC OR TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: 14,118 SF / 0.32 AC OR 85.2% FRONT YARD (SWIFT): 948 SF / 0.02 AC OR 77.3% LOT INFORMATION: TAX MAP NO. 1540-00760 BOURNE GARY J, V. 188 P 137-8 17,553 SF / 0.42 AC TAX MAP NO. 0700-00031 BOURNE GARY V. 326 P 50-2 16,575 SF / 0.40 AC TAX MAP NO. 1540-00764 764 SHELBURNE RD LLC, C/O GARY BOURNE V. 1035 P 233-4 26,572 SF / 0.61 AC PROPOSED - INDIVIDUAL LOTS 760 SHELBURNE ROAD LOT SIZE: 8,054 SF / 0.18 AC BUILDING COVERAGE: 3,350 SF / 0.08 AC OR 41.6% TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: 5,095 SF / 0.12 AC OR 63.2% 764 SHELBURNE ROAD LOT SIZE: 6,287 SF / 0.14 AC BUILDING COVERAGE: 3,240 SF / 0.07 AC OR 51.5% TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: 4,880 SF / 0.11 AC OR 77.6% FRONT YARD (SHELBURNE): 67 SF / 0.001 AC OR 4% 31 SWIFT STREET LOT SIZE: 46,359 SF / 1.06 AC BUILDING COVERAGE: 10,620 SF / 0.24 AC OR 22.9% TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: 35,625 SF / 0.82 AC OR 76.8% FRONT YARD: SHELBURNE RD: 381 SF / 0.008 AC OR 44% SWIFT ST: 1,311 SF / 0.03 AC OR 37.6% PARKING:35 SURFACE SPACES 27 GARAGE SPACES TOTAL:62 SPACES PROPOSED - OVERALL PUD 760 SHELBURNE ROAD PUD AREA: 60,700 S.F.SF / 1.39 AC BUILDING COVERAGE: ±17,210 SF / 0.40 AC OR 28.4% OVERALL COVERAGE: ±45,600 SF / 1.05 AC OR 75.1% FRONT YARD: SHELBURNE RD: ±903 SF / 0.02 AC OR 40.3% SWIFT ST: ±1,355 SF / 0.03 AC OR 53.1% 2 02/16/2023 CMJUtilities SNOW STORAGE NOTE: SNOW WILL BE STORED ONSITE IN LANDSCAPE BEDS AND GREEN SPACES WHERE FEASIBLE. SNOW THAT CANNOT BE STORED ONSITE WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE. 3 05/15/2023 LETStaff Comments LOT 1: LOT 2: LOT 3: 4 06/26/2023 LETStaff Comments DDDDDDOH OH OH 21 3 214 2 1 6 217213214212211215216214 21 2 213 2 11 216217213215212210214213211212210210212211213215217216214208209218219210211213212216214218217210209209210211212208SBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SBSBSBSB SBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSB10 ' 1-STORY BUILDING 1-STORY BUILDING SHELBURNE ROAD (U.S. ROUTE 7)SWIFT STREET D D D D D D D D DDD D D D D 1-STORY BUILDINGWWWWWWWWWWWW W W W W W W W W W CROSSWALK SIGNAL POLE LEGAL LOAD LIMIT SIGN UTILITY COVER CONCRETE FOOTING FOR ROUTE 7 OVERHEAD LANE ASSIGNMENT SIGN GUPUPUPUPUPUGUGUGUGSOL. #3 - 75"BUILT-IN TPCONTROLS FINANCIAL INSTITUTION ±3,350 SF ATM (8) BIKE SPACES ENCLOSED DUMPSTER S P E ED TA B L E PROPOSED 12' WIDE CROSS LOT CONNECTION MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL 27 DU FFE 217.0 BFE 207.0FDFDFDFD FDFDFD FD FDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDRDD D D MIXED USE ± 3,240 SF 1ST FLOOR: COMMERCIAL 2ND FLOOR: 3 DU FFE 212.0 FFE 212.0 DROP OFF AREA w/VEHICULAR PAVERS DDDDDDDDD D D D D D DDDD D MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL w/42" HIGH GUARDRAIL STORMWATER TREATMENT STRUCTURE (TYP.) CONCRETE STAIRS w/STAINLESS STEEL HANDRAILS (TYP.) MODULAR BLOCK WALL (TYP.) FLUSH CURB (TYP.) WOODEN CURVED BACKLESS BENCH (TYP.) STAMPED CONCRETE PAVEMENT 2' BRICK PAVING CONCRETE STAIRS w/STAINLESS STEEL HANDRAILS (TYP.) FLUSH CURB (TYP.) ADA SPACE w/VEHICULAR PAVERS DETECTABLE WARNING MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL (TYP.) 4' WOOD PRIVACY FENCE RAISED PLANTER w/MODULAR BLOCK WALL STAMPED CONCRETE PAVEMENT WOODEN CURVED BACKLESS BENCH (TYP.) STORMWATER TREATMENT AREA (TYP.) STAMPED CONCRETE PAVEMENT WOODEN CURVED BACKLESS BENCH (TYP.) CONCRETE STAIRS w/STAINLESS STEEL HANDRAILS (TYP.) MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL (TYP.)D210209211212211210209208213214216 21 5213 2 1 1 212209 210 211211 210212213213215 216 215216216.5 21721521621 4 218218217215209206205.521221 3 W W W W WWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSFD FD DD D MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL w/42" HIGH GUARDRAIL (2) BIKE SPACES CONCRETE SIDEWALK ±18"-36" MODULAR BLOCK FREESTANDING WALL (TYP.) WOODEN CURVED BACKLESS WALL CAP BENCH (TYP.) EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURE TO REMAIN 216210211209"HEAD ACHE BAR" COORD. w/SHOP DRAWINGS CANOPY LIMITS POTENTIAL FUTURE 10' x 6' GENERATOR LOCATION UP UP UPUPPAVED BIKE PATH SCULPTURE (TYP.) APPROX. LOCATION FOR REFERENCE ONLYFLUSH CURB (TYP.) 10' x 12' TRANSFORMER w/SCREEN FENCE IF REQ'D BY GMP SIGN (2) BIKE SPACES 21 3 214 2 1 6 217SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SBSBSBSBSB7 ENCLOSED DUMPSTER PROPOSED 12' WIDE CONNECTION FDFDFDFD FD FDFDFDFDFDGARAGE ENTRANCE D DDDD D MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL w/42" HIGH GUARDRAIL CONCRETE STAIRS w/STAINLESS STEEL HANDRAILS (TYP.) 4' WOOD PRIVACY FENCE 21221121020920821821721 5209206205.5212FD FD MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL w/42" HIGH GUARDRAIL (2) BIKE SPACES POTENTIAL FUTURE 10' x 6' GENERATOR LOCATION Sheet Title Project Title Use of These Drawings Scale: Project Number: Date: Drawn By: Project Engineer: Approved By: No. Description Date By Revisions 478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COM E N G I N E E R I N G S U R V E Y No. 8917 CIVILP ROF E SSIONAL E N G INEERLICEN S E DJENNIFER ANN DESA U T E LSSTA TE O F VER M ONTField Book: For Local Permitting Only 1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended for preliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines or utilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities. They are not intended as construction drawings unless noted as such or marked approved by a regulatory authority. 2. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project, the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved, and accepted the drawings, obtained all necessary permits, and have met with all applicable parties/disciplines, including but not limited to, the Engineer and the Architect, to insure these plans are properly coordinated including, but not limited to, contract documents, specifications, owner/contractor agreements, building and mechanical plans, private and public utilities, and other pertinent permits for construction. 3. Owner and Architect, are responsible for final design and location of buildings shown, including an area measured a minimum five (5) feet around any building and coordinating final utility connections shown on these plans. 4. Prior to using these plans for construction layout, the user shall contact TCE to ensure the plan contains the most current revisions. 5. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are not transferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, and copies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property. Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. If errors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought to the attention of TCE immediately. 6. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains the most current revisions. PLANNIN G ENVIRON MENTAL 1 15°±VT GridMagnetic PARCEL ID: 1540-00760 SPAN: 600-188-10694 Layout & Materials C2-01 01/20/2023 1" = 20' 22-523 PJM CMJ JAD Shelburne & Swift 760 & 764 Shelburne Rd. & 31 Swift St. South Burlington, VT GARAGE LEVEL ENTRANCE SCALE: 1" = 20' SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR UNDERGROUND PARKING LAYOUT LAYOUT AND MATERIALS NOTES 1.THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS SHOW DESIGN INTENT AND MUST BE FIELD VERIFIED PRIOR TO PREPARATION OF SHOP DRAWINGS. 2.ALL LINES ARE PARALLEL, PERPENDICULAR, OR 45 DEGREES TO THE LINES FROM WHICH THEY ARE MEASURED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.THE DIMENSIONS OF PAVEMENT AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE TO THE CENTER LINE OF EACH TYPE OF JOINT EXCEPT WHERE PAVEMENT MEETS A VERTICAL FACE; AT THIS LOCATION DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE VERTICAL FACE. 4.DIMENSIONS TO SITE OR BUILDING WALLS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE (OR EXPOSED) FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.EXPANSION JOINT FILLER AND SEALANT SHALL BE PLACED WHERE CONCRETE PAVEMENT MEETS CURBING, WALLS OR OTHER VERTICAL ELEMENTS, INCLUDING LIGHT BASES, HYDRANTS, BUILDINGS AND BUILDING COLUMNS, WALLS, STAIRS AND AT OTHER CONDITIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST THE PRESENCE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO REVIEW THE LAYOUT OF EXPANSION JOINTS PRIOR TO PLACING FINISHED WORK. 6.EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE LOCATED 25' - 30' O/C, MAX. 7.WHERE NEW PAVING OR EARTHWORK MEETS EXISTING PAVING OR EARTHWORK, SMOOTHLY BLEND LINE OF EXISTING WITH NEW. 8.RESTORE EXISTING CONDITIONS AS NECESSARY IN ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, RESETTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS, REPAVING AND SEEDING. 15°±VT GridMagnetic0 Feet Graphic Scale 20 40 60 02/09/2023 JADPlan Revisions 2 02/16/2023 CMJUtilities 3 05/15/2023 LETCity Comments 4 06/26/2023 LETStaff Comments DDDDDDOH OH OH 21 3 214 2 1 6 217213214212211215216214 2 1 2 213 21 1 216217213215212210214213211212210210212211213215217216214208209218219210211213212216214218217210209209210211212208SBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SBSBSBSB SBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSB10 ' 1-STORY BUILDING 1-STORY BUILDING SHELBURNE ROAD (U.S. ROUTE 7)SWIFT STREET D D D D D D D D DDD D D D D 1-STORY BUILDINGWWWWWWWWWWWW W W W W W W W W W CROSSWALK SIGNAL POLE LEGAL LOAD LIMIT SIGN UTILITY COVER GUPUPUPUPUPUGUGUGUG FINANCIAL INSTITUTION ±3,350 SF S P E E D TA B L E MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL 27 DU FFE 217.0 BFE 207.0 D D MIXED USE ± 3,240 SF 1ST FLOOR: COMMERCIAL 2ND FLOOR: 3 DU FFE 212.0 FFE 212.0 210209211212211210209208213214216 21 5213 2 1 1 212209 210 211211 210212213213215 216 215216216.5 21721521621 4 21821821721 5209206205.521221 3 216210211209PHASE IIPHASE I Sheet Title Project Title Use of These Drawings Scale: Project Number: Date: Drawn By: Project Engineer: Approved By: No. Description Date By Revisions 478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COM E N G I N E E R I N G S U R V E Y No. 8917 CIVILP ROF E SSIONAL E N G INEERLICEN S E DJENNIFER ANN DESA U T E LSSTA TE O F VER M ONTField Book: For Local Permitting Only 1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended for preliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines or utilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities. They are not intended as construction drawings unless noted as such or marked approved by a regulatory authority. 2. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project, the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved, and accepted the drawings, obtained all necessary permits, and have met with all applicable parties/disciplines, including but not limited to, the Engineer and the Architect, to insure these plans are properly coordinated including, but not limited to, contract documents, specifications, owner/contractor agreements, building and mechanical plans, private and public utilities, and other pertinent permits for construction. 3. Owner and Architect, are responsible for final design and location of buildings shown, including an area measured a minimum five (5) feet around any building and coordinating final utility connections shown on these plans. 4. Prior to using these plans for construction layout, the user shall contact TCE to ensure the plan contains the most current revisions. 5. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are not transferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, and copies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property. Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. If errors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought to the attention of TCE immediately. 6. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains the most current revisions. PLANNIN G ENVIRON MENTAL PROJECT LOCATION 0 Feet Graphic Scale 20 40 60 15°±VT GridMagnetic PARCEL ID: 1540-00760 SPAN: 600-188-10694 Phasing Plan C2-03 5/15/2023 1" = 20' 22-523 PJM CMJ JAD Shelburne & Swift 760 & 764 Shelburne Rd. & 31 Swift St. South Burlington, VT PHASING NOTES: CONSTRUCTION SHALL OCCUR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING PHASES: 1.PHASE 1: CONSTRUCTION OF TWO BUILDINGS ALONG SHELBURNE ROAD, CURB CUTS, CURBING, SIDEWALKS, SWIFT STREET REC PATH, UTILITIES, PARKING LOT AND DRIVE BASE CONSTRUCTION AND BASE PAVEMENT COARSE, LANDSCAPING AND STORMWATER INSTALLATION IN PHASE 1 AREA 2.PHASE 2: CONSTRUCTION OF MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING, CURBING, SIDEWALKS, UTILITIES, AND STORMWATER INSTALLATION IN PHASE 2 AREA 3.PHASE 3: CONSTRUCTION OF TOP PAVEMENT COARSE THROUGHOUT SITE, REMAINING LANDSCAPING, SITE AMENITIES, REMAINING FEATURES, AND FINAL STABILIZATION PHASING LEGEND: PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 NOTE: EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE FOR THE PROJECT DURATION UNLESS FINAL STABILIZATION IS INSTALLED BETWEEN PHASES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STABILIZE AND PROVIDE SAFETY MEASURES FOR ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AREAS ADJACENT TO COMPLETED PHASES IN ACCORDANCE WITH OSHA REQUIREMENTS. OPEN SPACE PHASING: PHASE 1: PHASE 1 OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS: COMMERCIAL: 6,590 SF x 6% = 396 SF RESIDENTIAL: 3 UNITS x 60 SF/UNIT = 180 SF REQUIRED OPEN SPACE: 576 SF PROVIDED: 890 SF PHASE 2: REMAINING OPEN SPACE 4 06/26/2023 LETStaff Comments DDDDDDOH OH OH 21 3 214 2 1 6 217213214212211215216214 2 1 2 213 21 1 216217213215212210214213211212210210212211213215217216214208209218219210211213212216214218217210209209210211212208SBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SB SBSBSBSB SBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSBSB10 ' 1-STORY BUILDING 1-STORY BUILDING SHELBURNE ROAD (U.S. ROUTE 7)SWIFT STREET D D D D D D D D DDD D D D D RIM = 209.0 18" RCP iIN(E) = 202.2 18" RCP iIN(S) =201.3 18" RCP IOUT(W) = 200.6 RIM = 210.8 15" RCP iIN(N) = 204.1 12" RCP iIN(E) =204.3 18" RCP iOUT(W) = 203.9 1-STORY BUILDINGWWWWWWWWWWWW W W W W W W W W W APPROX. LOCATION PER DIGSAFE MARKINGS EX. 8" WATER MAIN APPROX. LOCATION EX. 6" WATER MAIN (TO BE VERIFIED) CROSSWALK SIGNAL POLE LEGAL LOAD LIMIT SIGN UTILITY COVER CONCRETE FOOTING FOR ROUTE 7 OVERHEAD LANE ASSIGNMENT SIGN RIM = 207.9 SUMP = 203.1 18" RCP iOUT +/- 202.7 GUPUPUPUPUPUGUG UGUG45'-8"78'-10"SOL. #3 - 75"BUILT-IN TPCONTROLS FINANCIAL INSTITUTION ±3,350 SF S P E ED TA B L E MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL 27 DU FFE 217.0 BFE 207.0 DA 3 BIO DA 1 BIO FDFDFDFDFDFDFD FD FDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFDRDD DA 7 BIODD MIXED USE ± 3,240 SF 1ST FLOOR: COMMERCIAL 2ND FLOOR: 3 DU FFE 212.0 FFE 212.0 DDDDDDDDD D D D D D DDDD DD210209211212211210 209208213214216 21 5213 2 1 1 212209 210 211211 210212213213215 216 215216216.5 2172152162 1 4 218218217215209206205.521221 3 W W W W WWWWWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSSMH #1 RIM = 215.75 8" iIN = 207.27 6" iIN = 207.5 8" iOUT = 207.17 NEW 8" iIN = 207.0 6" iOUT = 209.0 SMH #2 RIM = 210.95 6" iIN (2) = 207.95 8" iOUT = 207.85 6" iOUT = 209.2 6" iOUT = 208.5 FD FD DD D 8" SDR 35 P V C s =0.004 ft./ft. DMH 2 RIM = 212.0 18" iIN (E) = 201.49 18" iIN (S) = 201.49 18" iOUT (NW) = 201.39 FILTERRA INTERNAL BYPASS BIOSCAPE 4'X6' MEDIA BAY CURB INLET = 214.5' 8" iOUT = 211.3' 4" FOOTING DRAIN ASSUMED INV = 205.0 FILTERRA PEAK DIVERSION 6X10' MEDIA BAY CURB INLET = 210.5' 12" iOUT ~ 207.09' DMH4 RIM = 211.3 12" iIN (E) = 206.0 18" iIN (S) = 201.86 18" iOUT (N) = 201.76 OUTLET STRUCTURE 1 18" OVERFLOW GRATE = 215.75 12" iOUT = 212.0 OUTLET STRUCTURE 2 18" OVERFLOW GRATE = 209.83 12" iOUT = 206.0 FILTERRA INTERNAL BYPASS BIOSCAPE 4X6' MEDIA BAY 6" iIN = 210.5 6" iOUT = 207.8' OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE 4 RIM = 211.5 6" iIN (S) = 206.3 18" iOUT (W) = 206.3 FILTERRA INTERNAL BYPASS BIOSCAPE 4'X6' MEDIA BAY PARKING LOT CURB INLET = 208.4' NW CORNER INLET (TOP OF MEDIA) = 207.6' 8" iOUT ~ 205.2' DMH 1 RIM = 210.5 12" iIN (NE) = 205.0 18" iIN (E) = 201.15 18" iOUT (NW) = 201.05 NEW 18" iIN = 201.0 DMH 5 RIM = 211.85 12" iIN (E) = 202.39 6" iIN (FOOTING DRAIN) = 204.0 WITH FLAPPER VALVE AT END 8" iIN (W) = 202.39 18" iOUT (N) = 202.29 OUTLET STRUCTURE 3 18" OVERFLOW GRATE = 206.75 12" iOUT = 202.5 DMH 6 RIM = 209.0 8" iIN (S) = 204.0 8" iOUT (E) = 203.9 EXTENDED DETENTION THREE - 48" HDPE X 80' INVERT = 206.3 FILTERRA INTERNAL BYPASS BIOSCAPE 6'X6' MEDIA BAY CURB INLET = 211.0 8" iOUT = 207.8' CURB INLET = 208.4 CB1 RIM = 212.0 12" iOUT = 210.75 DMH 3 RIM = 214.6 12" iIN (E) = 210.0 8" iIN (S) = 209.17 18" iOUT (W) = 204.17 TRENCH DRAIN AT ENTRANCE TO GARAGE WITH DEEP SUMP AT OUTLET (SEE DETAIL) GRATE = 207.0 6" ROOF DRAIN iOUT = 215.75 4" C900 DR14 1.5" C901 CTS POLY 4" TAPPING VALVE (TYP) 1.5" CURB STOP (TYP) (COPPER BETWEEN MAIN & CURB STOP)8" C900 DR148" TEE AND GATE VALVE (TYP)216210211209CB2 (DEEP SUMP) WITH CURB INLET 12" iIN = 209.8 12" iOUT = 209.7 POTENTIAL FUTURE 10' x 6' GENERATOR LOCATION UP UP UPUP6" ROOF DRAIN 8"X6"X6" TEE, 6" DI STUB, GATE VALVE AND FIRE PROTECTION HYDRANT, REDUCE TO 6" C900 AFTER TEE TO BUILDING 13'6" C900 DR144" C900 DR14 DOMESTIC SERVICE WITH 4" GATE VALVE 6" C900 DR14 FIRE SERVICE PEASTONE DIAPHRAGM (TYP.) 10' x 12' TRANSFORMER w/SCREEN FENCE IF REQ'D BY GMP YARD DRAIN RIM = 214.5 6" iOUT = 207.0 Sheet Title Project Title Use of These Drawings Scale: Project Number: Date: Drawn By: Project Engineer: Approved By: No. Description Date By Revisions 478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COM E N G I N E E R I N G S U R V E Y No. 8917 CIVILP ROF E SSIONAL E N G INEERLICEN S E DJENNIFER ANN DESA U T E LSSTA TE O F VER M ONTField Book: For Local Permitting Only 1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended for preliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines or utilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities. They are not intended as construction drawings unless noted as such or marked approved by a regulatory authority. 2. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project, the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved, and accepted the drawings, obtained all necessary permits, and have met with all applicable parties/disciplines, including but not limited to, the Engineer and the Architect, to insure these plans are properly coordinated including, but not limited to, contract documents, specifications, owner/contractor agreements, building and mechanical plans, private and public utilities, and other pertinent permits for construction. 3. Owner and Architect, are responsible for final design and location of buildings shown, including an area measured a minimum five (5) feet around any building and coordinating final utility connections shown on these plans. 4. Prior to using these plans for construction layout, the user shall contact TCE to ensure the plan contains the most current revisions. 5. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are not transferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, and copies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property. Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. If errors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought to the attention of TCE immediately. 6. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains the most current revisions. PLANNIN G ENVIRON MENTAL 0 Feet Graphic Scale 20 40 60 15°±VT GridMagnetic PARCEL ID: 1540-00760 SPAN: 600-188-10694 Utility Plan C3-01 01/20/2023 1" = 20' 22-523 PJM CMJ JAD Shelburne & Swift 760 & 764 Shelburne Rd. & 31 Swift St. South Burlington, VT "I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT, IN THE EXERCISE OF MY REASONABLE PROFESSIONAL JUDGMENT, THE DESIGN RELATED INFORMATION SUBMITTED WITH THIS APPLICATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT AND THE DESIGN INCLUDED IN THIS APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT COMPLIES WITH THE VERMONT WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY RULES." (REF. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RULES CHAPTER 1 §1-306 (b)). LAST REVISED 02/25/2020 1 02/09/2023 JADPlan Revisions 2 02/16/2023 CMJUtilities 3 05/15/2023 CMJStaff Comments 4 06/26/2023 LETStaff Comments Sheet Title Project Title Use of These Drawings Scale: Project Number: Date: Drawn By: Project Engineer: Approved By: No. Description Date By Revisions 478 BLAIR PARK ROAD | WILLISTON, VERMONT 05495 802 879 6331 | WWW.TCEVT.COM E N G I N E E R I N G S U R V E Y No. 8917 CIVILP ROF E SSIONAL E N G INEERLICEN S E DJENNIFER ANN DESA U T E LSSTA TE O F VER M ONTField Book: For Local Permitting Only 1. Unless otherwise noted, these Drawings are intended for preliminary planning, coordination with other disciplines or utilities, and/or approval from the regulatory authorities. They are not intended as construction drawings unless noted as such or marked approved by a regulatory authority. 2. By use of these drawings for construction of the Project, the Owner represents that they have reviewed, approved, and accepted the drawings, obtained all necessary permits, and have met with all applicable parties/disciplines, including but not limited to, the Engineer and the Architect, to insure these plans are properly coordinated including, but not limited to, contract documents, specifications, owner/contractor agreements, building and mechanical plans, private and public utilities, and other pertinent permits for construction. 3. Owner and Architect, are responsible for final design and location of buildings shown, including an area measured a minimum five (5) feet around any building and coordinating final utility connections shown on these plans. 4. Prior to using these plans for construction layout, the user shall contact TCE to ensure the plan contains the most current revisions. 5. These Drawings are specific to the Project and are not transferable. As instruments of service, these drawings, and copies thereof, furnished by TCE are its exclusive property. Changes to the drawings may only be made by TCE. If errors or omissions are discovered, they shall be brought to the attention of TCE immediately. 6. It is the User's responsibility to ensure this copy contains the most current revisions. PLANNIN G ENVIRON MENTAL PARCEL ID: 1540-00760 SPAN: 600-188-10694 Water Details C8-04 1/20/2023 22-523 PJM CMJ JAD Shelburne & Swift 760 & 764 Shelburne Rd. & 31 Swift St. South Burlington, VT W 010.1.2 3/4"=1' LAST REVISED 03/08/2021TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS TYPICAL WATER SERVICE TRENCH LC SAND BEDDING SEE PLAN FOR PIPE SIZE AND MATERIALS APPROVED BACKFILL TO BE FREE OF DEBRIS, ORGANIC REFUSE, OR FROZEN SOIL. FILL TO BE COMPACTED IN 12" LIFTS. SLOPE OR SHEET THE SIDES OF TRENCHES DEEPER THAN 5 FEET TOPSOIL, SEED, AND MULCH, OVERFILL FOR SETTLEMENT PAVED AREAS INITIAL 12" OF SELECT BACKFILL FREE OF ORGANIC OR FROZEN MATERIAL. COMPACT TO 95% DENSITY STANDARD PROCTOR. WHERE 6' OF COVER CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, COVER WATER MAIN WITH 2" INSULATION BOARD. USE 2" INSULATION BOARD ON SIDES, AS SHOWN, AND AT ALL ROAD CROSSINGS. EXTEND INSULATION 10' BEYOND ROAD IN BOTH DIRECTIONS. NOTES: 1.INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES RECOMMENDATIONS AND GUIDELINES. 2.IF 6' OF COVER CAN NOT BE MAINTAINED REVIEW AND DISCUSS WITH PROJECT ENGINEER. 3.ALL TRENCH EXCAVATIONS SHALL MEET OSHA, STATE & LOCAL REQUIREMENTS & SAFETY REGULATIONS.6"4"6' MIN.SEE PAVEMENTSECTION orMATCH EXISTING2' TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS CL FOR GRASSED AREAS FOR PAVED or GRAVEL SURFACES 3/4" CRUSHED STONE OR SAND BEDDING WATER MAIN (SEE SITE PLAN FOR PIPE SIZE & MATERIAL) ALL BACKFILL TO BE COMPACTED IN 6" LIFTS SEED AND MULCH, OVERFILL FOR SETTLEMENT GRADE AT 2:1 SLOPE WHEN DEPTH EXCEEDS 5' WHERE 6' OF COVER CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, COVER WATER MAIN WITH 2" INSULATION BOARD, AND USE MINIMUM 2" INSULATION BOARD ON SIDES. AT ALL ROAD, DRIVE AND SIDEWALK (SURFACE) CROSSINGS INSTALL 2" INSULATION BOARD ON TOP AND SIDES AS SHOWN AND EXTEND 10' BEYOND SURFACE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS. INSULATION SHALL BE FULL WIDTH OF TRENCH. DETECTABLE METALLIC WARNING TAPE LABELED "WATER" 4"x4"x48" PRESSURE TREATED POST OR EQUIVALENT PLASTIC MARKER EVERY 300' AND AT ALL BENDS (GRASSED AREAS) PAINTED BLUE UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE BACKFILL FREE OF ORGANIC OR FROZEN MATERIAL. COMPACTED TO 90% DENSITY STANDARD PROCTOR IN GRASSED AREAS INITIAL 12" OF SELECT BACKFILL FREE OF ORGANIC OR FROZEN MATERIAL COMPACTED TO 95% DENSITY STANDARD PROCTOR IN GRASSED AREAS BACKFILL MATERIAL TO MATCH STRUCTURAL ROADWAY GRAVEL, SEE ROADWAY SECTION. COMPACTED TO 95% DENSITY STANDARD PROCTOR NOTES: 1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE PIPE MATERIAL TYPE AND SPECIFICATION WITH THE LOCAL WATER UTILITY BEFORE SUBMITTING SHOP DRAWINGS FOR, ORDERING, OR INSTALLING ANY WATER MAIN OR SERVICE. IF THERE IS ANY DISCREPANCY MATERIAL SPECIFICATION ON THE PLANS AND WHAT THE LOCAL WATER UTILITY REQUIRES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF THE CHANGE AND USE THE MATERIAL SPECIFIED BY SAID UTILITY. 2.LENGTH OF OPEN TRENCH SHALL BE KEPT TO A MINIMUM. 3.IF UNSUITABLE MATERIAL IS REMOVED BELOW BEDDING, REPLACE WITH MATERIAL APPROVED BY ENGINEER AND COMPACT TO 95% MAXIMUM DENSITY. 4.NO MECHANICAL TAMPERS SHALL BE USED DIRECTLY OVER PIPE TO INSURE PIPE IS NOT DAMAGED. 5.BEDDING TO PROVIDE FIRM, STABLE, CONTINUOUS AND UNIFORM SUPPORT FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF PIPE. 6.INSTALL WATER MAIN IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURES GUIDELINES. 7.IF 6' OF COVER CAN NOT BE MAINTAINED DISCUSS WITH PROJECT ENGINEER AND TOWN (IF APPLICABLE) PRIOR TO INSTALLING. ADDITIONAL INSULATION OR OTHER MEASURES MAY BE REQUIRED DEPENDING ON COVER. 8.SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 9.IN NO CASE SHALL THE WATER MAIN BE BURIED LESS THAN 4 1/2 FEET BELOW FINISHED GRADE. 10.ALL TRENCH EXCAVATION SHALL MEET OSHA, STATE, & LOCAL REQUIREMENTS & SAFETY REGULATIONS. W 010.1.1 PIPE OD + 24"24"6"D6"12"6' MINIMUMSEE ROADWAYSECTION OR MATCHEXISTINGTYPICAL WATER MAIN TRENCH W 020.1.1LAST REVISED 02/09/2021TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS TYPICAL GATE VALVE (4" TO 12") WATER "WATER" CAST IN COVER FINISHED GRADE COATED CAST IRON TWO PIECE (SLIP TYPE) VALVE BOX WITH FLANGED TOP & LID. PROVIDE MUD CAP AND GATE BOX ALIGNER. 2" OPERATING NUT TURN COUNTER CLOCKWISE TO OPEN GATE VALVE AWWA C515 COMPLIANT GATE VALVE MODEL KS-RW OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT WITH STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS MEGALUG MECHANICAL JOINT CONNECTION 3/4" CRUSHED STONE BEDDING PAVED AREAS NOTE: IN REMOTE AREAS SUCH AS CROSS COUNTRY WATER LINE ROUTES, PROVIDE A CONCRETE PAD 24"x24"x8" THICK BEDDED ON 12" OF GRAVEL AND FLUSH WITH GRADE. ALSO PROVIDE 4"x4" PRESSURE TREATED POST STICKING 48" ABOVE GRADE TO MARK LOCATION. VALVE ANCHOR, 5 C.F. CLASS D CONCRETE USE # 4 BARS TO ANCHOR VALVE TO CONCRETE WATER MAIN NOTES: 1.INSTALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURES INSTALLATION GUIDELINES. 2.SUBMIT SHOP DRAWING TO PROJECT ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 3.COORDINATE WITH TOWN PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT AND STANDARDS WHEN APPLICABLE. 4.PROVIDE ONE VALVE KEY TO OWNER.6' MINIMUMW 040.1.1LAST REVISED 02/16/2021TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS TYPICAL WATER MAIN THRUST BLOCKS 2", 3" & 4"SAFE BEARING LOAD LBS/FT.² GRAVEL SHALE SOIL TYPE CLAY SAND TILL 10000 1000 2000 3000 4000 5.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 0.5 90° 7.0 3.5 2.5 2.0 1.0 45° 14.0 7.0 5.0 3.5 1.5 45° 8.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 10.5 5.5 3.5 3.0 1.0 22.5°45° 4.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 2.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 15.0 7.5 5.0 4.0 1.5 6" 90° 18.0 9.0 6.0 4.5 2.0 22.5° 4.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 90° 25.0 13.0 8.5 6.5 2.5 8" 2.0 5.0 7.0 10.0 21.0 3.0 7.0 9.0 14.0 28.0 22.5° 7.0 3.5 2.5 2.0 1.0 3.5 9.5 12.5 19.0 38.0 90° 10" 45° 1.0 2.5 4.5 5.0 10.5 22.5° 39.0 20.0 13.0 10.0 4.0 12" 90° 55.0 27.5 18.5 14.0 5.5 45° 30.0 15.0 10.0 7.5 3.0 22.5° 15.0 8.0 5.0 4.0 1.5 USE CLASS D (2500 PSI) CONCRETE FOR THRUST BLOCKS. PLACE 4 MIL. POLYETHYLENE BETWEEN FITTING AND THRUST BLOCK. PLACE THRUST BLOCK AGAINST UNDISTURBED TRENCH WALL - CONCRETE BEARING AREA ON FITTING TO BE A MINIMUM OF 1/2 SQUARE FOOT. THRUST BLOCKS BASED ON 200 PSI WORKING PRESSURE PLUS SURGE ALLOWANCE OF 100 PSI. IF GREATER THAN 200 PSI SEE PROJECT ENGINEER FOR SIZE. 90° ELBOW TEE 22 ½ ° ELBOW 45° ELBOW TRENCH WALL, TYPICAL UNDISTURBED SOIL, TYPICAL EXTEND 6" INTO TRENCH WALL (TYP). NOTE: 1.FOR REDUCERS, PROVIDE BEARING AREA FOR THE SOIL TYPE BASED ON 4000 LBS FOR EACH 2" REDUCTION IN SIZE. 2.PROJECT ENGINEER TO OBSERVE ALL THRUST BLOCKS PRIOR TO BACKFILL. PICTURES MAY BE USED AT ENGINEERS DISCRETION. 3.ALSO INCLUDE RETAINER GLANDS ON ALL BENDS, TEES, CAPS ETC. 4.CONCRETE NOT TO OVERLAP ANY JOINT. MINIMUM BEARING AREA IN SQUARE FEET ON UNDISTURBED TRENCH WALLTHRUST BLOCK TABLE CAP W/ MECH. JOINT CAP REDUCER OR TEE CAP OR TEE CAP OR TEE CAP OR TEE CAP OR TEE CAP WATER/SEWER MAIN SEPARATION DETAIL 18" 18" WATER MAIN ONE STANDARD FULL LENGTH OF WATER MAIN TO BE CENTERED OVER SEWER SEWER COMPACTED CRUSHED STONE BACKFILL IN 6" LIFTS SEWER MAIN 9' ONE STANDARD FULL LENGTH OF DUCTILE IRON SEWER MAIN TO BE CENTERED OVER WATER MAIN PVC SDR 35 SEWER MAIN UNDISTURBED SOIL FLEXIBLE COUPLING INCASED IN CLASS B CONCRETE WATER MAINS CROSSING ABOVE SEWERS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 18 INCHES BETWEEN PIPES. WATER MAIN JOINTS WILL BE EQUIDISTANT AND AS FAR AS POSSIBLE FROM THE SEWER. WHEN IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PROPER SEPARATION, THE SEWER SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED EQUAL TO WATER PIPE AND SHALL BE PRESSURE TESTED TO ASSURE WATERTIGHTNESS PRIOR TO BACKFILLING 2' 6" 6" WATER COMPACTED CRUSHED STONE BACKFILL IN 6" LIFTS CLASS B CONCRETE CRADLE TO EXTEND TWO FEET BEYOND WATER MAIN TRENCH WIDTH EACH SIDE SEWER MAINS CROSSING ABOVE SEWERS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 18 INCHES BETWEEN PIPES. SEWER MAIN JOINTS WILL BE EQUIDISTANT AND AS FAR AS POSSIBLE FROM THE WATER MAIN. WHEN IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN PROPER SEPARATION OR WHERE THE SEWER MUST BE LAID ABOVE THE WATER MAIN, THE SEWER SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED EQUAL TO WATER PIPE AND SHALL BE PRESSURE TESTED PRIOR TO BACKFILLING TO ASSURE WATERTIGHTNESS. LAST REVISED 02/16/2021 W 030.1.2 WATER MAIN ABOVE SEWERS PREFERRED METHOD WATER MAIN BELOW SEWER NOT HE RECOMMENDED METHOD NOTES: 1.PARALLEL INSTALLATION: WATER MAINS SHALL BE LAID AT LEAST 10 FEET HORIZONTALLY FROM ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED MANHOLE, SANITARY SEWER OR FORCEMAIN. THIS DISTANCE SHALL BE MEASURED EDGE TO EDGE. IF THIS DISTANCE CANNOT BE OBTAINED, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE LAID IN A SEPARATE TRENCH OR ON AN UNDISTURBED EARTH SHELF LOCATED ON ONE SIDE OF THE SEWER AT SUCH AN ELEVATION THAT THE BOTTOM OF THE WATER MAN IS AT LEAST 18 INCHES ABOVE THE TOP OF THE SEWER. WHERE SEWERS ARE BEING INSTALLED, AND THE ABOVE SEPARATION CAN NOT BE MET, THE SEWER MATERIALS SHALL BE WATER MAIN PIPE OR EQUAL AND SHALL BE PRESSURE TESTED TO ENSURE WATERTIGHTNESS. 2.CROSSINGS: SEE THE DETAILS TO THE LEFT. 3.SEWER RELATIONS TO WATERMAINS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "RECOMMENDED STANDARDS FOR SEWAGE WORKS" SO-CALLED TEN STATE STANDARDS. 4.WATERMAINS TO BE RECONSTRUCTED SHALL BE PUSH-ON OR MJ D.I. CL52 PIPE, AWWA C900 PVC PRESSURE PIPE OR HDPE SDR9 PRESSURE PIPE FOR A DISTANCE OF 10 FEET EACH SIDE OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE SEWER AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 5.THE PROJECT ENGINEER SHALL OBSERVE ALL CROSSINGS PRIOR TO BACKFILL. 6.ANY DEVIATIONS TO THESE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL REGULATORY AUTHORITIES. 7.PRIOR TO THE CROSSING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY INVERT OF SEWER TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER. TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS W 030.1.1LAST REVISED 02/16/2021TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS TYPICAL WATER/SEWER CROSSING LC WATER SEWER REQUIREMENTS: 1.WATER MAINS CROSSING SEWERS SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 18 INCHES BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE OF WATER MAIN AND THE OUTSIDE OF SEWER. THIS SHALL BE THE CASE WHERE THE WATER MAIN IS EITHER ABOVE OR BELOW THE SEWER. AT CROSSINGS, ONE FULL LENGTH OF WATER PIPE SHALL BE LOCATED SO BOTH JOINTS WILL BE AS FAR FROM THE SEWER AS POSSIBLE. IF THE SEWER MAIN IS OVER THE WATER MAIN, THE FIRST SEWER PIPE JOINTS ON EACH SIDE OF THE WATER MAIN MUST BE CONCRETE ENCASED. SPECIAL STRUCTURAL SUPPORT FOR THE WATER AND SEWER PIPES MAY BE REQUIRED. WATER MAINS SHALL NOT PASS THROUGH SEWER MANHOLES OR BE SUBMERGED IN BASINS CONTAINING SEWAGE OR OTHER GROSSLY CONTAMINATED OR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL. 2.THE PROJECT ENGINEER SHALL OBSERVE ALL CROSSINGS, PRIOR TO BACKFILL. 3.ANY DEVIATION TO THIS MINIMUM REQUIREMENT IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF REGULATORY AUTHORITIES. 4.PRIOR TO CROSSING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY INVERT OF SEWER AND WATER TO PROJECT ENGINEER. INVERT COMPACTED CRUSHED STONE BACKFILL IN 6" LIFTS18" MIN.WSR APPENDIX SUBSECTION 8.6.3 W 000.1.1LAST REVISED 02/04/2021TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS TESTING WATER MAINS AND HYDRANTS *ALL TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN THE PRESENCE OF THE TOWN ENGINEER OR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IF APPLICABLE OR PRIVATE OWNER/OPERATOR AND PROJECT ENGINEER (AS DESIGNATED BY OWNER). CONTRACTOR SHALL PRE-TEST SUCCESSFULLY PRIOR TO CONTACTING PROJECT ENGINEER. THE PRE-TEST IS TO ENSURE PASSING RESULTS PRIOR TO OFFICIAL TESTING OBSERVATION. A.AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN LAID AND 7 DAYS AFTER THE CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKS AND ANCHORS HAVE BEEN PLACED, THE WATER MAIN SHALL BE HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED ACCORDING TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AWWA SPECIFICATION C-600, AND VERMONT PLUMBING RULES. B.CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY ALL NECESSARY APPARATUS TO PERFORM THE HYDROSTATIC TEST. C. TEST PRESSURE SHALL BE 200 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH OR 1.5 TIMES THE WORKING PRESSURE MEASURED AT OR NEAR THE HIGH POINT IN THE SYSTEM, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. TEST SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 2 HOURS IN DURATION. TESTING ALLOWANCE SHALL BE DEFINED AS THE VOLUME OF WATER THAT MUST BE SUPPLIED INTO THE NEWLY LAID PIPE OR ANY VALVED SECTION THEREOF TO MAINTAIN PRESSURE WITHIN 5 PSI (34.5 kPa) OF THE SPECIFIED TEST PRESSURE AFTER THE PIPE HAS BEEN FILLED WITH WATER AND THE AIR HAS BEEN EXPELLED. THE TESTING ALLOWANCE SHALL NOT EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE (L) OR ELSE THE SECTION OF PIPE BEING TESTED WILL BE CONSIDERED FAILED. TESTING ALLOWANCE SHALL NOT BE MEASURED BY A DROP IN PRESSURE IN A TEST SECTION OVER A PERIOD OF TIME. REFER TO PIPE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDED TESTING PROCEDURE INCLUDING PIPE STABILIZATION PRIOR TO START OF TEST. D.THE PROJECT ENGINEER AND THE MUNICIPALITY SHALL BE CONTACTED 48 HOURS PRIOR TO TESTING. E.ALL VALVES SHOULD BE VERIFIED AS BEING OPEN OR CLOSED AS APPROPRIATE FOR THE PORTION OF THE WATER MAIN BEING TESTED. F.ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE SHALL BE COMPUTED BY THE FORMULA: L=(S x D x √P)/148,000 WHERE L IS LEAKAGE IN GALLONS PER HOUR, S IS THE LENGTH OF PIPE TESTED IN FEET, D IS THE NOMINAL DIAMETER OF THE PIPE IN INCHES AND P IS THE AVERAGE TEST PRESSURE IN POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH DURING THE TEST. G.REPLACE AND RETEST ANY WORK FOUND TO BE DEFECTIVE AFTER FAILED TEST AT NO EXPENSE TO OWNER AND RETEST UNTIL SYSTEM PASSES A.AFTER TESTING THE WATER MAINS, OPEN THE HYDRANT FULLY AND FILL WITH WATER. TO PREVENT CAPS FROM BEING BLOWN OFF, VENT AIR FROM ONE OF THE CAPS WHILE IT IS BEING FILLED. WHEN ALL THE AIR HAS ESCAPED, TIGHTEN THE CAP. B.ALLOW THE PRESSURE TO BUILD UP TO MAIN LINE PRESSURE AND CHECK FOR LEAKAGE AT FLANGES, NOZZLES AND THE OPERATING STEM. RECORD STATIC PRESSURE IN PSI. C.FLOW HYDRANT AND RECORD FLOW RATE IN GPM AND RESIDUAL PRESSURE IN PSI. SUBMIT RESULTS TO PROJECT ENGINEER. D.CLOSE THE HYDRANT, REMOVE ONE NOZZLE CAP AND PLACE THE PALM OF YOUR HAND OVER THE OPENING. DRAINAGE SHOULD CREATE A NOTICEABLE SUCTION. IF NO SUCTION OR HYDRANT DOESN'T HAVE DRAIN, MANUALLY PUMP WATER OUT OF BARREL. E.AT PROJECT ENGINEER DISCRETION, ASSIST WITH FLOW TESTING. ENGINEER TO RECORD STATIC AND RESIDUAL PRESSURE AS WELL AS FLOW RATE. TESTING WATER MAINS TESTING HYDRANTS (IF APPLICABLE) W 000.2.2LAST REVISED 02/04/2021TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS DISINFECTION OF WATER SYSTEM *ALL TESTING SHALL BE PERFORMED IN THE PRESENCE OF THE TOWN ENGINEER OR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND PROJECT ENGINEER (AS DESIGNATED BY OWNER). A. PRIOR TO BEING PUT INTO SERVICE, WATER MAINS SHALL BE DISINFECTED ACCORDING TO THE LATEST EDITION OF AWWA SPECIFICATION C-651. THE TABLET METHOD IN AWWA STANDARD 651 IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. B. THE NEW LINE SHALL BE FLUSHED AT A VELOCITY OF NOT LESS THAN 2.5 FEET PER SECOND (OPEN 2-1/2 INCH HYDRANT CONNECTION). FLUSH FOR A PERIOD DETERMINED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER FOR THE LENGTH OF MAIN TO BE DISINFECTED. C. CHLORINATION SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY INTRODUCING A SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION FOR A RESULTANT CONCENTRATION OF GREATER THAN 25 PARTS PER MILLION OF FREE CHLORINE. D. USING A NOZZLE AT EACH END HYDRANT, CONTROL THE RATE OF FLOW INTO THE NEW MAIN AND PROPORTIONALLY FEED THE SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE SOLUTION INTO THE MAIN. AFTER THE SOLUTION HAS REACHED ALL POINTS IN THE SYSTEM, CLOSE THE VALVE SUPPLYING WATER FROM THE EXISTING MAIN AND THE END HYDRANTS. MAINTAIN THE HEAVILY CHLORINATED WATER IN THE MAIN FOR 24 HOURS DURING WHICH TIME ALL MAIN LINE VALVES SHOULD BE OPERATED. AFTER 24 HOURS THE MINIMUM CHLORINE RESIDUAL MUST BE AT LEAST 10 PARTS PER MILLION. E. FLUSH HEAVILY CHLORINATED WATER FROM THE LINE AND REFILL THE LINE FOR SERVICE (USE CHLORINE DIFFUSER). TAKE AND SUBMIT TWO BACTERIOLOGICAL SAMPLES (TAKEN 24 HOURS APART) OF THE WATER TO THE STATE OF VERMONT OR A STATE APPROVED TESTING LABORATORY. IF THE RESULTS ARE UNSATISFACTORY, THE DISINFECTION PROCEDURE WILL BE REPEATED UNTIL SATISFACTORY RESULTS ARE OBTAINED. F. FINISHED WATER STORAGE STRUCTURES SHALL BE DISINFECTED IF APPLICABLE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH CURRENT AWWA STANDARD C652. TWO OR MORE SUCCESSIVE SETS OF SAMPLES, TAKEN AT 24 HOUR INTERVALS, SHALL INDICATE MICROBIOLOGICALLY SATISFACTORY WATER BEFORE THE FACILITY IS PLACES INTO OPERATION. G. DISPOSAL OF HEAVILY CHLORINATED WATER FROM THE DISINFECTION PROCESS SHALL BE DE-CHLORINATED OR OTHERWISE HANDLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES. H. THE DISINFECTION PROCEDURE (AWWA CHLORINATION METHOD 3, SECTION 4.3 C652) WHICH ALLOWS USE OF THE CHLORINATED WATER HELD IN THE STORAGE TANK FOR DISINFECTION PURPOSES IS NOT RECOMMENDED. WHEN THAT PROCEDURE IS USED, IT IS REQUIRED THAT THE INITIAL HEAVILY CHLORINATED WATER BE PROPERLY DISPOSED IN ORDER TO PREVENT RELEASE OF WATER WHICH MAY CONTAIN VARIOUS CHLORINATED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS INTO THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. DISINFECTING WATER MAINS AND SYSTEMS W 000.2.1LAST REVISED 03/08/2021TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE DESIGN ENGINEER CERTIFYING THAT THE INSTALLATION HAS BEEN INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PERMITTED DESIGN, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A CERTIFICATION THAT THE WATER SYSTEM WAS INSTALLED AND TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED DESIGN PLANS. STATE PERMITS REQUIRE THERE SHALL BE NO DEVIATIONS FROM THE APPROVED PLANS WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVALS. THE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED AND ALLOWED TO OBSERVE THE CRITICAL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING ANY REQUIRED TESTS. LIKEWISE, THE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE APPROVED PLANS. SINCE THE DESIGN ENGINEER DOES NOT CUSTOMARILY OBSERVE ALL PHASES OF THE WORK, OR ALL TESTING, HE MAY RELY ON THE CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION AS THE BASIS FOR FINAL CERTIFICATION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL THEREFORE SIGN AND RETURN A COPY OF THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK: "I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSTALLED, PROPERLY TESTED, AND SUCCESSFULLY PASSED THOSE TESTS, AND THE WATER SYSTEM(S) ARE BUILT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED DESIGN PLANS AND APPLICABLE PERMIT CONDITIONS." THE CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION INCLUDES SUPPLIERS AND SUB-CONTRACTORS CONTRACTOR NAME: AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME: SIGNATURE: DATE: NOTE ANY DEVIATIONS FROM APPROVED PLANS HERE: NOTE: THE CERTIFICATION AND THE PROJECT ENGINEER'S SUBSEQUENT CERTIFICATION DOES NOT VOID THE CONTRACTOR FROM REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF DISCREPANCIES DISCARDED AT A LATER DATE. THE CONTRACTOR REMAINS RESPONSIBLE, INCLUDING CUSTOMARY GUARANTEE AND WARRANTY PERIODS. CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION FOR WATER SYSTEM 4 06/26/2023 CMJStaff Comments W 020.1.5 1"=1'-0" TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS TYPICAL WATER CURB STOP LCPAVED AREAS IN NON PAVEMENT AREA MARK LOCATION OF CURB STOP WITH A 2x4 BROUGHT TO THE SURFACE WITH THE LETTER "W" MARKED ON IT, SET FLUSH TO GRADE ERIE CURB BOX WITH STATIONARY ROD AND ARCH PATTERN BASE 3/4" - 1" PLUG TYPE CURB STOP WITH COMPRESSION CONNECTIONS (MUELLER H-25209) 4" x 8" x 16" CLASS D CONCRETE PAD ON COMPACTED BASE STAINLESS STEEL ROD TYPE K COPPER TO MAIN NOTES: 1.3/4" AND 1" CORPORATIONS SHALL BE DIRECTLY TAPPED INTO DUCTILE IRON PIPE 6" AND LARGER IN DIAMETER. LARGER SIZE CORPORATIONS UP TO 2" SHALL REQUIRE USE OF A TAPPING SADDLE. A CONNECTION MADE TO A PIPE THAT REQUIRES A SADDLE OR IS NOT DUCTILE IRON WILL HAVE A BODY WITH A SUITABLE OUTLET, SEAL, AND SUITABLE MEANS FOR ATTACHMENT TO THE MAIN. THE SADDLE SHALL PROVIDE A DRIP TIGHT CONNECTION AND SHALL BE TEFLON OR EPOXY COATED WITH STAINLESS STEEL STRAPS, BOLTS, NUTS AND MECHANISM FOR ATTACHING TO THE PIPE BARREL. 2.INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES INSTALLATION GUIDELINES AND TOWN PUBLIC WORK STANDARDS WHEN APPLICABLE. ALSO COORDINATE WITH TOWN ENGINEER WHEN APPLICABLE. 3.PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION SUBMIT SHOP DRAWING OF MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURE TO PROJECT ENGINEER. 4.CHLORINATE AND SUCCESSFULLY TEST WATER QUALITY PRIOR TO MAKING SERVICE AVAILABLE FOR USE. EXISTING SOIL 3/4" - 1" QUARTER TURN BALL VALVE CURB STOP WITH COMPRESSION CONNECTIONS, MUELLER H-25209 OR CAMBRIDGE BRASS FOR 1 1/2"-2" ADD ENLARGED FOOTPIECE CURB STOP6' TYPICAL DEPTH Landscape Budget Requirement (Land Development Code Article 13): Estimated Construction Cost: $4,400,000 3% First $250K……....…....$7,500 2% Second $250K…….….$5,000 1% Remaining………………...$39,000 Required Landscape Budget: $51,500 SYM QTY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INSTALL SIZE CONDITION COMMENTS / SPACING COST PER PLANT(installed)TOTAL TREES AB Abies balsamea 'Phanerolepis'Caanan Fir 6-8' HT B&B As Shown, Full $840 $0 AF 4 Acer freemanii 'Autumn Blaze'Autumn Blaze Freeman Maple 2.5" Cal B&B Limb to 7' HT $1,025 $4,100 AAM 7 Amelanchier x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance'Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry 8-10' HT B&B Multistem, 3 or more trunks $810 $5,670 AMS 1 Amelanchier x grandiflora 'Autumn Brilliance'Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry 8-10' HT B&B Single stem $810 $810 CC Carpinus caroliniana American Hornbeam 3-3.5" Cal B&B Limb to 5' HT $1,675 $0 GT Gleditisia triacanthos var inermis 'Halka'Halka Thornless Honeylocust 2.5" Cal B&B Limb to 7' HT $1,080 $0 NS 1 Nyssa sylvatica "Green Gable'Green Gable Black Tupelo 2.5" Cal B&B Limb to 7' HT $1,075 $1,075 PS 5 Prunus sargentii 'Pink Flair'Pink Flair Sargent Cherry 2.5" Cal B&B Limb to 5' HT $900 $4,500 SHRUBS BM 2 Buxus microphylla 'Green Mountain'Green Mountain Boxwood #3/18" SP Cont.As Shown $174 $348 CAR 5 Clethra alnifolia 'Ruby Spice'Ruby Spice Summersweet #2 Cont.4' O.C.$84 $420 CAH 5 Clethra alnifolia 'Hummingbird'Hummingbird Summersweet #2 Cont.4' O.C.$84 $420 CS Cornus sericea 'Arctic Fire'Red Twig Dogwood #2 Cont.3 Cane min., 30" HT $86 $0 CSK 79 Cornus sericea 'Kelseyii'Kelsey Compact Red Twig Dogwood #1 Cont.3 Cane min., 30" HT, 30" O.C.$54 $4,266 HAP Hydrangea anomola petiolaris Climbing Hydrangea #3 Cont.As Shown $120 $0 HAI 5 Hydrangea arborescens 'Invincibelle'Invincibelle Hydrangea #2 Cont.4' O.C.$84 $420 HAL 8 Hydrangea arborescens 'Invincibelle Limetta'Invincibelle Limetta Hydrangea #2 Cont.3' O.C.$86 $688 IVF 3 Ilex verticillata 'Berry Heavy'Winterberry Holly #2 Cont.As Shown, Female $84 $252 IVM 1 Ilex verticillata 'Jim Dandy'Winterberry Holly #2 Cont.As Shown, Male $86 $86 JH 39 Juniperus horizontalis 'Bar Harbor'Bar Harbor Creeping Juniper 18" SP Cont.3' O.C.$81 $3,159 RS 5 Rhododendron maximum 'Roseum'Rhododendron #4 Cont.As Shown $145 $725 RAG 22 Rhus aromatica 'Gro-low'Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac #2 / 24 SP Cont.4' O.C.$86 $1,892 RR 21 Rosa rugosa Saltspray Rose #2 Cont.4' O.C.$72 $1,512 SBT 44 Sprirea betulifolia 'Tor'Tor Spirea 15" HT Cont.3' O.C.$78 $3,432 SJL 12 Spirea japonica 'Little Princess'Little Princess Japanese Spirea 15" HT Cont.3' O.C.$78 $936 SAW 24 Spirea x bumalda 'Anthony Waterer'Anthony Waterer Spirea 15" HT Cont.3' O.C.$84 $2,016 TM 12 Taxus x media 'Ever-Low'Ever-Low Creeping Yew #2 / 24 SP Cont.As Shown $133 $1,596 VT Viburnum trilobum 'Wentworth'Cranberrybush Viburnum 3-4' HT Cont. / B&B As Shown $185 $0 PERENNIALS AD Aruncus dioicus Goatsbeard #2 Cont.36" O.C.$32 $0 AN Aster novae-anglae New England Aster #2 Cont.24" O.C.$28 $0 CAK 132 Calamagrostis × acutiflora 'Karl Foerster'Feather Reed Grass #2 Cont.24" O.C.$33 $4,356 EPM 58 Echinacea purpurea mix Kims Knee High Purple Coneflower #2 Cont.24" O.C.$38 $2,204 EP 27 Echinacea purpurea 'Magnus'Magnus Purple Coneflower #2 Cont.24" O.C.$33 $891 HM Hakenechloa macra Hokone Grass #2 Cont.24" O.C.$45 $0 HMA Hakenechloa macra 'Aureola'Golden Hokone Grass #1 Cont.18" O.C.$33 $0 HS 42 Hosta spp.Hosta species #2 Cont.Use variaties: Guacalome, Francee, Mouse Ears, Halycone in groups of 5+$42 $1,764 HSS 7 Hosta 'Sum and Substance'Sum and Substance Hosta #2 Cont.36" O.C.$42 $294 IVE Iris versicolor Blue Flag Iris #2 Cont.24" O.C.$27 $0 MML 3 Miscanthus sinensis 'Morning Light'Morning Light Maiden Grass #2 Cont.4' O.C.$35 $105 PVN 30 Panicum virgatum Switchgrass #2 Cont.24" O.C. Use mix: Heavy Metal, Northwind,Shenandoah $33 $990 SS Schizachyrium scoparium 'Blue Paradise'Blue Paradise Little Bluestem #2 Cont.24" O.C.$27 $0 SH 84 Sporobolus heterolepis Prairie Dropseed #2 Cont.18" O.C.$33 $2,772 Total Site Planting COST:$51,699 Hardscape Site Elements QTY UNIT COST PER UNIT TOTAL Site Furnishings Benches 28 LF $300 $8,400 Sculpture EA $4,000 $0 Hardscape COST:$8,400 TOTAL LANDSCAPE COST:$60,099 Last Revised 05/15/2023 Opinion of Landscape Costs Shelburne Road & Swift Street22-523 Prepared by TCE Preliminary & Final Plat | January 2023 June 30, 2023 VIA EMAIL mkeene@southburlingtonvt.com Chair, Development Review Board City of South Burlington, VT c/o Marla Keene 108 Market Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Inclusionary Housing 760 & 764 Shelburne Road and 31 Swift Street, South Burlington Dear Chair: I recently submitted an opinion regarding the calculation of inclusionary housing units under the housing bonus provided under § 18.01(g)(2) of the South Burlington Zoning Ordinance. As you may remember, there is a difference of opinion whether an application in this instance utilizing the full bonus for 30 units requires 10 inclusionary units (staff’s opinion) or 7 (applicant’s position). The interpretation is important because for this development and other developments, staff’s opinion will cause applicants to abandon use of the bonus, which will have the pernicious effect of causing applicants to build less housing (both market rate and inclusionary) because as interpreted by staff, the bonus is not a bonus at all. As follow-up to our discussion, I reached out to Brian Sullivan for his views on the subject. Brian is not only a recent former member of the South Burlington DRB, but he is also a highly respected land use and zoning attorney who has no dog in this fight. Our e-mail discussion is attached verbatim, his calculation and comments being, and I quote: “My interpretation of Section 18.01(G)(2) (density bonuses) requires a calculation as follows: 1.Determine the total number of units allowed in the applicable district for the applicable use; 2.Determine how many of those units must be inclusionary, which will be the same number as the “offset” units; 3.Add the number of offset units to the total determined in step one; 4.Determine the difference between the total number of units and 1.5 x the total number of units; MARK HALL mhall@pfclaw.com Chair, Development Review Board C/O Marla Keene June 30, 2023 Page 2 5. Take the number determined in step 4 and divide it in half – yielding the number of potential additional inclusionary units, which will be the same as the number of “bonus” market rate units. Let’s take the numbers in the City’s Example 4: 1. Total units allowed is 40; 2. Required inclusionary units total 6; which is the same number as the offset units; 3. The total at this point is 46; 4. The difference between the total number of units (46) and 1.5x the allowed amount (60) is 14; 5. If the developer wants to add all 14, he or she must divide that equally between inclusionary and market rate “bonus” units. That results in a grand total of 60 units, 13 of which are inclusionary and 47 of which are market rate. The calculations done in this Example are, therefore, wrong, at least as to the breakdown of inclusionary vs. market rate units. Let’s use the numbers in our case: 1. Total units allowed is 20; 2. Required inclusionary units total 3; which is the same number as the offset units 3. The total at this point is 23; 4. The difference between the total number of units (23) and 1.5x the allowed amount (30) is 7; 5. If the developer wants to add all 7, he must divide that equally between inclusionary and market rate bonus units. Of course, 7 is an odd number, so you’d round the inclusionary up from 3.5 to 4 and the market rate bonus units down from 3.5 to 3. This results in a grand total of 30 units, 7 of which are inclusionary and 23 of which are market rate. So, in sum, it is my opinion that your calculations are correct and those of the Planning and Zoning Department are incorrect.” Based on simple rules of construing zoning ordinances, the explicit manner of calculation prevails over an erroneous example. To that point, I followed up with Brian on this “zoning interpretation 101” hierarchy, to which he replied, “I agree. The language in the Regs is unambiguous, so it controls. The examples would be useful except for the fact that there is a math error in number 4.” Attorney Sullivan’s opinion is correct. As the Vermont Supreme stated, Chair, Development Review Board C/O Marla Keene June 30, 2023 Page 3 [the] goal in interpreting a zoning ordinance is to effectuate the intent of the drafters. In re Howard Ctr. Renovation Permit, 2014 VT 60, ¶ 9, 196 Vt. 542, 99 A.3d 1013. And because “[t]he primary purpose of zoning is to bring about the orderly physical development of a community,” it is “essential” to our inquiry that we examine not only the plain language of the disputed ordinance, but also the whole of the enactment, seeking to effectuate its every part. In re Tyler Self-Storage Unit Permits, 2011 VT 66, ¶ 13, 190 Vt. 132, 27 A.3d 1071 (quotation omitted). Where the ordinance's “‘express language leads to an irrational result,’” we turn to other sources to guide our inquiry into the drafters’ intent. Confluence Behav. Health, 2017 VT 112, ¶ 20, 206 Vt. 302, 180 A.3d 867 (quoting Tyler Self-Storage Unit Permits, 2011 VT 66, ¶ 6, 190 Vt. 132, 27 A.3d 1071). Because zoning ordinances exist in derogation of private property rights, such ambiguities are resolved in favor of the landowner. In re Lathrop Ltd. P'ship I, 2015 VT 49, ¶ 29, 199 Vt. 19, 121 A.3d 630. In this regard, zoning regulations are construed “’in light of the intention indicated by the caption’ to avoid unfounded interpretations.” State v. Lynch, 137 Vt. 607, 613, 409 A.2d 1001, 1005 (1979) (citing Audette v. Greer, 134 Vt. 300, 302, 360 A.2d 66, 68 (1976)). In this case, the intent is expressly stated in the caption as a “Density Bonus for Exceeding Inclusionary Housing Requirements”. The language of § 18.01(G)(2) unequivocally provides for a split in the bonus units between market and inclusionary. Example 4 contains no such split nor any bonus, so it’s just a mistake in the drafting of the ordinance that must be ignored. Respectfully, this matter is resolved by recourse to basic principles of statutory construction, and I do not see it as a close call. Frankly, I think any 10 lawyers and any 10 judges would opine the same way, so I again encourage you to run this by counsel for the city. I apologize for pushing so hard on this point, but this is important because if the current interpretation stands, the project will lose seven units, four of which would have been inclusionary. Moreover, if the interpretation stands, it will adversely impact any number of residential projects involving the bonus. I’m happy to discuss with counsel if that would be helpful. Cordially yours, PAUL FRANK + COLLINS P.C. Mark Hall MGH:jtg cmcneil@southburlingtonvt.gov 8899048_1:14629-00002 From: Mark G. Hall <MHall@pfclaw.com> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2023 4:31 PM Hi Brian, thanks for getting back to me. I don’t see an issue with you’re having been on the DRB. May even help in some ways. The client is Gary Bourne for conflict issues. I have permission to seek an opinion, but I should get your rate so I can pass along. I’ve attached a draft of the calculation I did that provides the numbers and the zoning provisions. The letter explains our calculation for adding 7 additional units under the bonus, which we feel should be 1 market rental for each voluntary inclusionary rental. Planning is taking the position that all 7 should be inclusionary, which seems to conflict with the operable provision that says: § 18.01G(2): (2) Density Bonuses. When an applicant voluntarily includes, in the base zoning density unit-maximum for the development, more than the number of inclusionary units required under Section 18.01(C)(1), then upon the applicant’s request, the development shall receive, in addition to the offset units, a density bonus. The density bonus shall be one dwelling unit for each voluntary Inclusionary Rental Unit and two dwelling units for each voluntary Inclusionary Ownership Unit, up to a maximum density of 50% more than the base maximum density permitted in the zoning district…. Density bonus dwelling units are not subject to the inclusionary affordability requirements. (Emphasis added.) Planning is hung up on an example 4 provided in the ordinance, which states: Example (4): In a 40-unit rental housing development on a 10-acre plot in a R4 district, the developer is required to build six (6) inclusionary units. The developer shall receive an offset of six (6) market rate dwelling units, and the project now includes a total of 46 dwelling units. In order to receive approval for the maximum 50% density increase (which equates to a maximum of 14 additional units in this example since the offset units need to be accounted for), the developer includes an additional fourteen (14) inclusionary units in the base zoning density unit-maximum (40) for which the developer receives 14 bonus density units. In sum, the total project includes 60 units, 20 of which are inclusionary (33% of the units) and 40 of which are market rate (67% of the units). I think the example 4 was calculated incorrectly, if one goes by the math provided in the density provision; otherwise, it’s a bonus without a bonus. The pernicious effect is that the developer just pulls the additional units, which helps no one. I’ve taken the position that, in conflict. the ordinance calculation under 18.01G(2) prevails over the example. I don’t see how they can be reconciled, but if I’m wrong I should know it. Please run your own calculation and, if I’m wrong or missing something, please let me know. Please feel free to review the ordinance to the extent you need to or look at any case law you deem necessary for the review. I’m trying to get an answer quickly (my apologies), as planning is asking for things on an expedited basis. From: Brian Sullivan <bsullivan@mskvt.com> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2023 1:25 PM 2 To: Mark G. Hall <MHall@pfclaw.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Legal opinion Hi Mark: Thanks for your patience. I’ve looked at the description of Gary’s project in light of the applicable South Burlington Land Development Regulations and the examples given in that section of the LDRs. In brief, I concur with your reasoning and conclusion. Let me explain. My interpretation of Section 18.01(G)(2) (density bonuses) requires a calculation as follows: 1. Determine the total number of units allowed in the applicable district for the applicable use; 2. Determine how many of those units must be inclusionary, which will be the same number as the “offset” units; 3. Add the number of offset units to the total determined in step one; 4. Determine the difference between the total number of units and 1.5 x the total number of units; 5. Take the number determined in step 4 and divide it in half – yielding the number of potential additional inclusionary units, which will be the same as the number of “bonus” market rate units. Let’s take the numbers in the City’s Example 4: 1. Total units allowed is 40; 2. Required inclusionary units total 6; which is the same number as the offset units; 3. The total at this point is 46; 4. The difference between the total number of units (46) and 1.5x the allowed amount (60) is 14; 5. If the developer wants to add all 14, he or she must divide that equally between inclusionary and market rate “bonus” units. That results in a grand total of 60 units, 13 of which are inclusionary and 47 of which are market rate. The calculations done in this Example are, therefore, wrong, at least as to the breakdown of inclusionary vs. market rate units. Let’s use the numbers in our case: 3 1. Total units allowed is 20; 2. Required inclusionary units total 3; which is the same number as the offset units 3. The total at this point is 23; 4. The difference between the total number of units (23) and 1.5x the allowed amount (30) is 7; 5. If the developer wants to add all 7, he must divide that equally between inclusionary and market rate bonus units. Of course, 7 is an odd number, so you’d round the inclusionary up from 3.5 to 4 and the market rate bonus units down from 3.5 to 3. This results in a grand total of 30 units, 7 of which are inclusionary and 23 of which are market rate. So, in sum, it is my opinion that your calculations are correct and those of the Planning and Zoning Department are incorrect. Regards, Brian (he/him) Brian J. Sullivan MSK Attorneys 275 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 802-861-7000, ext. 1160 www.mskvt.com bio: https://www.mskvt.com/attorneys-staff/brian-sullivan/ Member of Law Firm Antiracism Alliance This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies or records of the original message. 4 From: Mark G. Hall <MHall@pfclaw.com> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2023 1:40 PM To: Brian Sullivan <bsullivan@mskvt.com> Subject: RE: Legal opinion Thanks for jumping on this, Brian. I got the same numbers on the example 4. Do you agree that in this conflict that the example 4 should be ignored due to the error? My view is that the language of the provisions stating the manner of calculation prevails. To: Brian Sullivan <bsullivan@mskvt.com> Subject: RE: Legal opinion I agree. The language in the Regs is unambiguous, so it controls. The examples would be useful except for the fact that there is a math error in number 4. Regards, Brian (he/him) Brian J. Sullivan MSK Attorneys 275 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 802-861-7000, ext. 1160 www.mskvt.com bio: https://www.mskvt.com/attorneys-staff/brian-sullivan/ Member of Law Firm Antiracism Alliance This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies or records of the original message.