The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSD-20-02 - Supplemental - 0010 Mansfield View Lane (31)1 Marla Keene From:David Marshall <dmarshall@cea-vt.com> Sent:Wednesday, May 20, 2020 6:54 AM To:Marla Keene Cc:mkoch@cea-vt.com Subject:RE: EXTERNAL: Re: SD-20-02 10 Mansfield View Ln - April 21 and then June 2nd..... Attachments:WS1 AUTOTURN.pdf; C2.0 PROPOSED SITE.pdf; C2.2 UTILITY.pdf; C3.0 ESPC Precon.pdf; C3.1 ESPC Final.pdf; C4.0 SITE DETAILS.pdf; Keene Updated Information Cover Letter 20-05-20.pdf; L101 _Landscape_Details_05.18.20.pdf; L102_Landscape_Specifications_05.18.20.pdf Hi Marla‐ With the additional impervious area associated with the rec path and the central green and the connector road, we have not found a way that we can remain prudently within the originally approved impervious area allotment within the Meadowland Business Park stormwater permit. As such we will need to seek a continuance of three months to enable us to work through the stormwater issues with the State. In the meantime we have provided formal responses to the Staff report with supporting plan updates. Best Regards David S. Marshall, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 P 802-864-2323 x310 F 864-2271 From: Marla Keene [mailto:mkeene@sburl.com] Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 1:01 PM To: dmarshall@cea-vt.com Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: SD-20-02 10 Mansfield View Ln - April 21 and then June 2nd..... Hi Dave, here’s the recommendation from the State on addresses: 1. What is labeled on the site plan as 34, I would call that 80 Mansfield View Ln 2. What is labeled on the site plan as 36, I would call that 82 Mansfield View Ln Regarding feedback from SBRC/Tim McK, if you don’t have anything, I would advise that it’s not a big deal. Otherwise, sounds good! I hope you don’t have to let this project be the allegorical cobbler’s son! Marla Keene, PE Development Review Planner City of South Burlington (802) 846‐4106 2 From: David Marshall <dmarshall@cea‐vt.com> Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 12:04 PM To: Marla Keene <mkeene@sburl.com> Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: SD‐20‐02 10 Mansfield View Ln ‐ April 21 and then June 2nd..... Hi Marla‐ Finally circling back on your request for additional information on this application. We are in the process of pulling together the information and hope to have it squared away by the 20th. If not, then we will likely need to ask for another continuance. Sorry…. Outlined is some preliminary responses. We will follow‐up in a more formal manner to the 20‐ 03‐04 staff report. Thanks! David S. Marshall, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 P 802-864-2323 x310 F 864-2271 From: Marla Keene [mailto:mkeene@sburl.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 11:54 AM To: Dave Marshall Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: SD-20-02 10 Mansfield View Ln - April 21 Hi Dave, The Board continued this application to June 2. Materials for that hearing should be submitted no later than May 20. Here’s a summary of what I had for outstanding topics: 1. Conditional use – the Board had intimated they wanted some feedback from adjoiners on proposed conditional use. My feedback is if you’re unable to provide this, it wouldn’t be the first time the Board has had to make a determination on conditional use without neighbor feedback.[Dave Marshall] We are working with Tim McKenzie at South Burlington Realty on providing supporting narrative on this waiver request. 2. Water/wastewater preliminary allocation[Dave Marshall] . We have staff preparing an update to the original request and preliminary issuance supplied by the City. 3. Fire truck turning movement plan using 1990 version of WB 40 (attached)[Dave Marshall] We will provide this plan to you shortly under separate cover. 4. Storm comments other than the one pertaining to work on adjacent lot[Dave Marshall] . We will have formal responses on this ‘ 5. Tree planting details[Dave Marshall] . We will have WHLA prepare a typical detail sheet for you and Craig to review. [Dave Marshall] Hi Marla‐ I believe that you shared the 911 address numbers for the two proposed buildings but they are at the office. Can you advise on what you found on this? Thx Let me know if you have questions! 3 Sincerely, Marla Keene, PE Development Review Planner City of South Burlington (802) 846‐4106 From: Dave Marshall <dmarshall@cea‐vt.com> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 1:46 PM To: Marla Keene <mkeene@sburl.com> Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: SD‐20‐02 10 Mansfield View Ln ‐ April 21 This message has originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email. Hi Marla‐ I agree that it would be prudent to continue this application further down the line in order to address those specific issues that remain open for the application. With everything going on I think we would need to have a minimum of a one‐month continuance. Please let this serve as our formal request for such a continuance and we will forward on to you the continuance fee shortly. Thank you Sent from the field. Dave M. On Apr 13, 2020, at 1:14 PM, Marla Keene <mkeene@sburl.com> wrote: Hi Dave, I went through my notes from March 4, and the Board asked you to address a few things prior to the next hearing. I don’t believe I’ve received any new materials from you since March 4. Noticing has obviously been addressed, but there were outstanding items related to conditional use, w/ww allocation, fire truck movement, stormwater and landscaping as well. With the understanding that folks are not working at full capacity, would you like request continuation to get these issues addressed? New materials are due two weeks before a hearing, and with only a couple days before packet launch, at this time we do not have the capacity to make an exception. <image001.jpg> Marla Keene, PE Development Review Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846‐4106 www.southburlingtonvt.gov Notice - Under Vermont’s Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which 4 may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation.