HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0035 White Street (2)State of Vermont
Department of Environmental Conservation
Agency of Natural Resources
WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT
LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED
10 V.S.A. Chapter 64, Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit
Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, Effective September 29, 2007
Chapter 21, Water Supply Rules, Effective December 1, 2010
Landowner(s): Edmund A. Chastenay Family Trust Permit Number: WW-4-4015
c/o Joseph Chastenay PIN: EJ13-oo98
97 Hinesburg Road
South Burlington VT 05403
This permit affects property identified as Town Tax Parcel ID # South Burlington: 1600-ooO35
referenced in a deed recorded in Book 459 Pages 728-732 of the Land Records in South Burlington,
Vermont.
This project, consisting of a fifty seat restaurant with four employees in an existing commercial building on an existing
0.58 acre parcel, utilizing existing municipal water and wastewater services, located at 35 White Street in the City of
South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the
following conditions.
i.GENERAL
1.1 The project shall be completed as shown on the following plans and/or documents prepared by W. Bradford
Ramsay, p.E., , with the stamped plans listed as follows:
Sheet:
Title
Plan Date
WWo
Cover Sheet and Location Plan
April 6, 2013
WW1
Site Plan
April 6, 2013
1.2 This permit does not relieve the landowner from obtaining all other approvals and permits PRIOR to construction
including, but not limited to, those that may be required from the Act 25o District Environmental Commission;
the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division; the Watershed Management Division; the Division of
Fire Safety; the Vermont Department of Health; the Family Services Division; other State departments; or local
officials.
1.3 The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the
landowner and all assigns and successors in interest. The landowner shall record and index this permit in the
South Burlington Land Records within thirty, (3o) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of
any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit.
1.4 This project is approved for the existing commercial building on the lot. Construction of additional nonexempt
buildings, including commercial and residential buildings, is not allowed without prior review and approval by the
Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal
conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. No construction is allowed that will cause non-compliance with
an existing permit.
1.5 Each purchaser of any portion of the project shall be shown a copy of the Wastewater System and Potable Water
Supply Permit and the stamped plan(s), if applicable, prior to conveyance of any portion of the project to that
purchaser.
Regional Offices — Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury
Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit
WW-4-4oi5
Page 2of2
1.6 By acceptance of this permit, the landowner agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the
property subject to this permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont
environmental/health statutes, regulations, and permit conditions, including performing an inspection of the
wastewater disposal and water supply systems serving the/each structure.
1.7 Any person aggrieved by this permit may appeal to the Environmental Court within 3o days of the date of
issuance of this permit in accordance with 10 V.S.A. Chapter 22o and the Vermont Rules of Environmental Court
Proceedings.
2.WATER SUPPLY
2.1 This project is approved for existing connection to the water supply system owned by the City of South for a
maximum of 2,304 gallons of water per day.
2.2 The landowner shall install and maintain backflow prevention devices that conform to Vermont Department of
Public Safety standards and NFPA 13 for the connection of any sprinkler fire suppression system to a public
drinking water system.
2.3 This project is approved with an existing building water line. The Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection
Division assumes no liability for the adequacy of this water line. Should the line fail and not qualify for the minor
repair or replacement exemption, the landowner shall engage a Licensed Designer to evaluate the cause of the
failure and to submit an amendment application to this office prior to correcting the failure.
2.4 This permit is based, in part, on a municipal approval for connection to their water distribution system. If the
municipal approval expires, this permit shall be invalid unless the municipality renews its approval. If the
municipality approval expires, a new permit must be issued for the project. An updated application form and an
application fee will be required for the project. A new municipal approval letter shall be required. The rules in
effect at the time of the filing of the application for a new permit will be applied to the project.
3.WASTEWATER DISPOSAL
3.1 This project is approved with the existing connection to the City of South Burlington wastewater treatment facility
for a maximum of 2,048 gallons of wastewater per day.
3.2 This project is approved with an existing building sewer line. The Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection
Division assumes no liability for the adequacy of this sewer line. Should the line fail and not qualify for the minor
repair or replacement exemption, the landowner shall engage a Licensed Designer to evaluate the cause of the
failure and to submit an amendment application to this office prior to correcting the failure.
3.3 This permit is based, in part, on a municipal approval for connection to their wastewater treatment facility. If the
municipal approval expires, this permit shall be invalid unless the municipality renews its approval. If the
municipality approval expires, a new permit must be issued for the project. An updated application form and an
application fee will be required for the project. A new municipal approval letter shall be required if the project is
served by the municipal wastewater collection system. The rules in effect at the time of the filing of the
application for a new permit will be applied to the project.
David K. Mears, Commissioner
Department of Environmental Conservation
By
W' iam E. Zab' oski, Assistant Regional Engineer
Dated April2 , 2013
cc South Burlington Planning Commission
W. Bradford Ramsay, P.E.
Department of Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety
Department of Health — Food & Lodging Licenses
�VERMONT
State of Vermont
Department of Environmental Conservation
Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division
Essex Regional Office
ill West Street
Essex Junction, VT 05452-4695
wvvw.septic.vt.gov
April 15, 2013
Edmund A. Chastenay Family Trust
c/o Joseph Chastenay
97 Hinesburg Road
South Burlington VT 05403
Agency of Natural Resources
[phone] 802-879-5656
[fail 802-879-3871
RE: WW-4-4015, change of use from an existing twenty five seat restaurant to a fifty seat restaurant with four
employees located at 35 White Street in South Burlington, Vermont.
Dear Applicant:
We received your completed application for the above -referenced project on April 12, 2013, including a fee of
$180.00 paid by check #210102480. Under the performance standards for this program, we will have a
maximum of 45 days of "in-house" time to review your application. If we require further information from you
to make a decision, the time until we receive it is not included in the in-house performance standards.
If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application
within the 45 in-house days, please contact this office.
We have forwarded the information contained in your application to the Information Specialist for this region.
A Project Review Sheet will be sent to you indicating other state agencies and departments you should contact
regarding additional permits or approvals you may need under their programs. If you have not already done so,
you should also check with town officials about any necessary town permits.
If you submitted your application electronically through eDEC, your consultant will need to
upload any revisions and send an email to Ernestine Chevrier, James Sandberg and the
reviewer notifying us that you have resubmitted information. This email should reference both
the eDEC number and the WW number for the project.
For the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division
Ernestine Chevner
Regional Office Coordinator
cc: South Burlington Planning Commission
W. Bradford Ramsay
Regional Offices — Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury
09/16/2008 City of South Burlington Grand List Page 1 of 1
09:11 am Parcel Report bmcdonough
For Parcel: 1800-00035. CHASTENAY EDMUND A & STELLA G TRUST
Name CHASTENAY EDMUND A & STELLA G TRUST
C/O JOSEPH CHASTENAY
97 HINESBURG RD
S BURLINGTON VT 05403
Location
911 35 WHITE ST
Tax Map 21-075-000
Codes: (1) (Category)C (Equipment) (Owner)T
Wood Crop Pasture Other
Site
Acres: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00
Real Land Building
Equipment
Values: 280,300 175,000 105,300
0
Homestead Veterans Farm Stab.
L.U. Acres
0 0.00 0.00
0.00
Contract Lease Prev. Eqpm
Land Use Amt
0 0.00 0
0.00
Housesite Special Exmp Grand List
0.00 0.00 2,803.00
Misc: Status: T Bill #: 51651 Updated: 04/25/2008
Last sale was: Invalid on / / for $0 recorded
on 0/0
Grievance Info: Flag: N Remarks: (1)
Misc Fields: (0): 150497000
(8) : N
(9): 06/23/00
SPAN: 600-188-11207
Total
0.55
Inventory
0
Land Use
0.00
Prev. Real
280,300
1 � )
Memorandum - Planning
August 8, 1987
Page 4
c) Spear Street/Swift Street intersection will have B
without the project and B with the project.
4) Dorset Street/Swift Street intersection requires geometric
improvements including a second east bound lane on Swift Street
approach and two additional lanes on the south bound Dorset
Street approach to segregate turning movements.
5) A study to determine if the Spear Street/Swift Street signal
should remain after the Shelburne Road construction in completed.
6) Levels of service on Dorset Street between Swift and Kennedy
will be D in 1992 and will remain at D with the project. The
level of service on Swift Street between Dorset and Spear will be
D in 1992 without the project and C with the project provided
travel lanes are widened to 12 feet each with 6 feet of paved
shoulder on each side.
7) He concludes that the project only warrants the left turn
lane on the south bound approach of Dorset Street. The other
improvements are warranted whether or not the project is built.
Craig Leiner's comments will be available at the meeting.
Other: See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments.
6) GEORGE TRONO, 35 WHITE STREET
Mr. Trono proposes to convert the former NAPA parts store to a
bagel bakery/coffee shop. This use was approved by the Zoning
Board after reducing the number of seats from 50 to 24. The
Board called it a coffee shop which is an accessory use to the
bakery. These are all permitted uses.
Access and Circulation: Access is shown from ..illiston Road and
2 curb cuts on White Street. One curb cut wilt. be removed from
Williston Road. By my request, White Street ac,:-ess is shown as a
separate entrance and exit drives and a counte clockwise circu-
lation pattern is shown.
Parking: The business requires 7 parking space. Given the
nature of the business, I recommend that the Co -.mission approve
several more spaces. Fourteen angled spaces ar shown.
Landscaping: Almost all of the lot is paved or developed. The
plans show increased landscaping and grassed .yeas around the
building, along Williston Road and by my reques-, a larger island
along White Street that also serves to line up ;.arking spaces.
Traffic:_ The site is in Overlay Zone 1 for, w_ liston Road and
Overlay Zone 5 for White Str-eet. The .55 acre ot. permits 9 trip
4
Memorandum - Planning
August 8, 1987
Page 5
ends to 27 trip ends during the peak hour. The bakery will
generate 30-70 trip ends during the peak hour based on counts at
the Winooski bagel business. Mr. Trono is not able to close the
Williston Road driveway as a condition of his lease with Mr.
Chastenay. One small curb cut will be closed. As an alternative
to closing the Williston Road entrance, the Planning Commission
might consider making the Williston Road driveway an entrance
only. Left turing vehicals from the west are likely to turn at
the new signallized intersection at White Street/Midas Road
rather than in the middle of Williston Road.
A contribution to the Williston Road intersection improvement
fund is required based on the proposed trip ends.
Other: See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments.
A 1080 gpd sewer allocation is needed. The $2.50/gallon charge
must be paid prior to permit. No permits will be issued until
capacity is available.
7) KELLEY AND JENNINGS, 45 SWIFT STREET
Mr. Kelley and Mr. Jennings propose to convert the former NET to
a mixed use building with a wholesale florist, offices and
warehouse use. This received ZBA approval for multiple uses.
Access: Access is shown from two curb cuts on Swift Street. The
curb radii on these cuts will be increased to accommodate turning
trucks. Two cuts in the front of the building will be closed
and grassed.
Circulation: Circulation is shown as a one way circulation
pattern in a clockwise direction.
Parking: The plans show 28_parking spaces; This is sufficient.
The rear of the building is graveled and there is no change to
this area.
Landscaping: The plan requires $225. in new landscaping. The
applicant requests credit for the existing landscaping.
Traffic:_ The applicant projects 5 ends during the peak hour.
This is not in an overlay zone.
Other: See Bill Szymanski's and Chief Goddette's comments.
The project requires a sewer allocation of 225 gallons per day.
The $2.50 per gallon fee is required prior to permit. The lot
coverage is 85%; the maximum allowable is 70% however, several
paved areas in front are being removed and grassed.
5
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
FAX 658-4748
PLANNER
658-7955
December 11, 1990
Mr. George Trono
G.T. Bakery
35 White Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
Re: Escrow Agreement
Dear George:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Be advised that the City of South Burlington hereby agrees to
release your escrow agreement issued by the Vermont National Bank
in total.
Please forward a copy of this letter to Vermont National Bank,
Winooski branch.
Should you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me.
Very truly,
.4
Richard Ward,
Zoning Administrative Officer
RW/mcp
1'
i'
ESCROW AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, in triplicate, by and between GE_ O_NO
hereinafter referred to as "Developer", the
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, hereinafter referred to as "Municipality",
VER r-AOAJT NATIONAL 3ANK
and WtNOOSK --ggRNCH hereinafter referred to as "Bank".
W I T N E S S E T Il:
4aHEREAS, Developer has received final subdivision approval from
ZENOVATIO+13
the Municipality's Planning Commission for the n
a t
tQ be k _. .. --s �DOUc) 5q, FT, X 1 - �
t~ 1 S i 1 N C� J3 I �_qc 1r-_---_-- -
"fiLTCRATlaA1.5 To 5X/5T/n1G 3u1L4rNG
as depicted on a final plat plan entitled r
F01? t-JC- -) 3ACoEL FACTOR '
dated _%U - 30 - prepared by GoPDou G, WOpD_S
and
and
WHEREAS, Developer is required by said approval, at its own
expense, to complete certain improvements; and
WHEREAS, the parties to this agreement wish to establish an
escrow account to secure the obligations of. the Developer as set
forth in the final subdivision approval; and
WHEREAS, the Bank executes this agreement solely in the
capacity of escrow agent.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as
follows:
1. Developer will at its own expense complete the following
improvements in connection with its development:
(Description of public improvements required by subdivision_.1p rov'.11)
A.
2. Developer will convey to the Municipality h,." properly
executed Warranty Deed, free and clear of all encumbrances, the
roadways, easements and other puhl.ic improvements prior to'the
Municipality granting any zoning permits to the developer.
3. The Developer shall complete the improvements set forth
in paragraph one no later than AUGUR_ 9 8 8
4. The Developer shall repair or replace any faulty or
defective work or, improper material which may appear within O N L-:
year of completion.
5. For the guaranty of Developer's performance of all
requirements hereinabove set forth, Developer and Bank agree that
the sum of $(Amount set by planning commission or its designee)
shall be set aside and held in escrow by the Bank and shall be
available for payment to the Municipality, in accordance with
the terms herein set forth. �GcT, #31 I ��335a
6. If the Municipality shall file with the Bank a state-
ment that Developer is in the judgement of the Municipality in
sixty (60) day default under the terms of this agreement, the
Bank shall from time to time pay monies from said escrow fund
to the Municipality, in amounts not to exceed a total enabling
the Municipality to complete the improvements and requirements
set forth in this agreement.
7. The Municipali-ty will promptly submit to the Developer
a copy of such statement as it files with the Bank. The consent
of the Developer to such payment by the Bank to the Municipality
-2-
A
shall not be required. The Bank shaa.1 incur no Iill t,ilit:v to
the Developer on account of making such payment to thr Municipality,
nor shall the Bank be required to inquire into the propriety of
any claim by the Municipality of default on the part of the
Developer or into the use of such funds by the Municipality in
completing such improvements.
8. The Municipality shall not file with the Bank a state-
ment of default until sixty (60) days aEter notice has been sent
by it to the Developer by certified mail, return receipt requested,
setting forth its intention to do so.
9. All monies released by the Bank to the Municipality
pursuant to paragraph 6 shall be used by the MUniciE)<�lity solcl:y
for the purpose of performing obligations imposed upon the
Developer by that portion of this agreement upon which the
Developer is then in default. Any work to be pc�rf.ormed i>y
the Municipality pursuant hereto shall be let on a contractual
basis, or on a time and material basis, or shall be performed
by the Municipality with its own work force and equipment or shall
be accomplished in such manner as in the judgment of the
Municipality shall accomplish the work most expeditiously and
economically.
10. If monies are released by the Bank to the Munici;-)ZIl.ity
pursuant to paragraph 6 and it shall later develop that a
portion of the released monies are surplus to the Municil)ality's
needs, any -such surplus shall be refunded by the municipality
to the Bank to be held and distributed by the Bank I:)ursuant
to the terms of this agreement.
11. The Bank will not refuse or delay to make such payments
to the Municipality when requested by the Municipality by the
- 3-
appropriate statement, and Developer will not inter[ere with or
hinder such payments by the Bank to the Municipality. Said
statement shall. contain a certificate of compliance with the
notice requirements of paragraph B of: this agreement.
12. This agreement shall terminate and shall be of no force
or effect upon performance of all requirements contemplated
hereby and the completion of the warranty period set forth in
paragraph 4.
13. Upon request of Developer, but only at the sole discretion
of the Municipality, the Municipality may release a portion
of said escrow funds if the Municipality believes that the retention
of said funds is not necessary to protect its interests after
a portion of said work has been completed. Bank may release such
funds only upon written consent of the Municipality.
14. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 13 the sum
of $�00•11" shall be in any event maintained in
escrow until certification to the Bank by the Municipality of the
completion of the warranty period set forth in paragraph 4.
15. This agreement shall not only be binding upon the parties
hereto,.but also their respective heirs, executors, administrators,
successors and assigns.
-4-
Imtec3 Lhis clay of
IN THE PRESENCE OF:
(DEVELOPER)
By:
Its D Authorized Agent
CITY OF SOUTH BUR INGTON
ri
Its Duly Au ord Agent
By : _
Its Du A thorize gent
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
PLANNER
658-7955
August 28, 1990
Mr. George Trono
35 White Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
Re: Bagel Factory
Dear. Mr. Trono:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
I recently visited the Bagel Bakery property at. 35 White Street
to determine compliance with the approved site plan. I found
that the dumpster was not screened with a stockade fence as shown
on the plan. Please have this fence installed as soon as possi-
ble.
One of the conditions to your August 22, 1990 approval was that a
revised plan be submitted showing additional trees and that. the
outdoor eating area be removed from the plan. We have no record
that. a revised plan was submitted. Therefore, please submit a
revised plan for our records.
One of the other conditions was that you install a "no left turn"
sign facing outbound Williston Road traffic on Williston Road.
You were also to install a "do not enter" sign on Williston Road
facing east bound traffic. I did not see either one of these
signs. Please have these signs installed as soon as possible.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact. me.
Since}aely,
Raym6nd J. Belair,
Zoning and Planning Assistant.
RJB/mcp
No Text
PLANNER
658-7955
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
February 8, 1990
Mr. George Trono
35 White Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Dear Mr. Trono:
Enclosed please find your copy of Findings of Fact. If you have
any questions please call me.
Sincerely,
Joe Weith,
City Planner
JW/mcp
1 Encl
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
PLANNER
658-7955
October 13, 1989
Mr. George Trono
G. Trono and Sons Bagel Factory
35 White Street
South Burlington, Vermont. 05403
Re: Bagel Factory, White Street
Dear Ma-. Trono:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed are the 8/22/89 Planning Commis-Ii.on meeting minutes.
Please meet the stipulations contained in the approval motion
including the submission of a revised plan. Please call if you
have any questions. /
inc¢rely,� r
Yoe Weith,
City Planner
1 Encl
JW/mcp
Planning Commission -2- AUGUST 22. 1989
4. Revised Site Plan application of George Trono for conversion
of an existing building to a bagel/coffee shop. 35 White Street.
Mr. Trono explained that he was requesting the Commission to not
require a condition of his original approval which involved the
placement of posts between his property and the "U-Save" property
to the northeast. He explained that the posts would interfere
with on site circulation and make it difficult for his delivery
trucks to maneuver. There is currently a shared r.o.w. on the
"U-Save" property which allows both property owners to utilize
each others land. Ms. Maher asked why the approved landscaping
plan was not followed. Mr. Trono said he was concerned about the
large trees blocking his sign and door so he instead planted low
bushes. Mr. Weith said the value of the planted landscaping did
not meet the value of the approved landscaping. The members
recommended planting one tree near the sign and one or two ever-
greens in the side yard to bring the landscaping value up to the
approved value.
Cathy Peacock moved the South Burlington Planning Commission
approve the revised site Plan application of George Trono for
conversion of an existing building to a bagel/coffee shop as
depicted on a plan titled "Alterations to existing building for
new Bagel Bakery for George Trono, 35 White Street, South Burl-
ington. Vermont." prepared by Gordon Woods Associates, and dated
July. 1987, last revised August. 1989 with the following stipula-
tions•
1. The applicant shall put in additional trees to bring the
installed landscape Plan uP to the value of the Plan originally
Proposed. The number, types and location of additional plantings
shall be shown on a revised plan and shall be approved by the
Planner.
2. A revised plan shall also snow the note for outdoor eating
removed as originally approved.
3. The stipulations of the _September �2. 1987 approval motion
shall still apply.
Mr_ Belt.er secc)nded. Motion passed unanimously.
5. Site Plan application of Mountain Cable Company for construc-
tion of a ?2 , ilr'O sn,_�are foot b,7.1 j d.1r^ f1„— office use
and a 5.000 square foot storage building. lot 2. Kimball Avenue.
Intersection Improvements
The 10/14/89 condition of approval (enclosed required that the
following intersection improvements which were recommended by JHK
& Associates be completed by the applicant..
1. Dual left turn lanes out of the Factory Outlet and split
phasing for the approaches from both shopping centers;
2. a new controller shall be installed; and
3. operation of the controller in semi -actuated fashion with
an overlay of the phasing for the lefts from Route 7.
Installation of the new controller (improvement 42) has been
completed by the State. Roger Dickinson reevaluated the traffic
analysis and found that improvement #1 is not necessary. The
VAOT and Burlington concur with this conclusion. Craig Leiner,
however, is not thoroughly convinced that. improvement #1 is not
needed. He recommended that the applicant take counts 6 months
after T.J. Maxx is open and rerun the analysis to see if improve-
ment. 41 is needed. If the analysis shows a need for the improve-
ment, the applicant will be required to complete it. If the
improvement is not warranted, the bond will be released.
The reevaluation conducted by Roger Dickinson showed that im-
provement #3 would benefit the traffic situation. I recommend
that the applicant still be required to implement this improve-
ment.
I recommend that the City retain $12,000 of the original $80,00
bond to cover improvement #1, if needed, and improvement #3.
4) G.T. BAGEL FACTORY, WHITE STREET
George Trono proposes to revise his site plan for operation of a
bagel/coffee shop business at 35 White Street which was approved
by the Planning Commission on 9/22/87. Mr. Trono proposes to
remove the proposed posts separating his property from the "U-
Save" Beverage Store property which was added as a requirement by
the Planning Commission. Mr. Trono claims that these posts would
hinder efficient onsite circulation (see enclosed letter).
I agree that the location of the posts would hinder the
maneuverability of trucks on his property and the Beverage
Store's property. I do not completely understand why these posts
were required. I will check with Jane Lafluer and Craig Leiner
before Tuesday's meeting to see of they can shed some light.
5' MCUNTA _7 CABLE, SOT =, KIMBALL AVENUE
2
PLANNER
658-7955
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
August 18, 1989
Mr. George Trono
G. Trono and Sons Bagel Factory,
35 White Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05403
Re: Revised Site Plan, 35 White Street
Dear Mr. Trono:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission
meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Please be
sure someone is present on Tuesday, August 22, 1989 at 7:30 P.M.
to represent your request.
Sincerely,
Z�;,T'2oe Weith,
City Planner
Encl.s
JW/mcp
8/22/89
JW
MOTION OF APPROVAL
I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the
revised site plan application of George Trono for conversion of
an existing building to a bagel/coffee shop as depicted on a plan
titled "Alterations to existing building for new Bagel Bakery for
George Trono, 35 White Street, South Burlington, Vermont,
prepared by Gordon Woods, Associates, and dated July, 1987, last
revised August, 1989 w Lz-4 &-
1 J �.t-,.-z �a-1 cf`.t c. c r. —,,`y
8/22/89
JW
MOTION OF APPROVAL
I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the
revised site plan application of George Trono for conversion of
an existing building to a bagel/coffee shop as depicted on a plan
titled "Alterations to existing building for new Bagel Bakery for
George Trono, 35 White Street, South Burlington, Vermont,
prepared by Gordon Woods, Associates, and dated July, 1987, last
revised August, 1989.
�? <6-)
t44 , /\-S k
A of t> S c_ 1n-A ; ,,, (,—
-
(ea _ 8 � iz _ �ti J
J
Cfl�ILG C.
--:) f =// 0
G. TRONO and SONS BAGEL FACTORY
35 WHITE STREET
S. BURLINGTON, Vt. 05403
July 31, 1989
City of S. Burlington
575 Dorset Street
S. Burlington. Vt. 05403
Attn: Joesph Wieth
Dear Mr. Wieth
I wish to request permission to go before the next scheduled
meeting of your Planning Commission Board. The reason is to ask
for a variance on one of the site improvements, which was a
condition of my site plan approval.
The site improvement that I am referring to is that which
states that I am required to install a series of post along
the rear of the U-Save building off from the Williston Road
curb out. I strongly feel to impliment this condition would
create more of a hazzard than an improvement. The post placed
in this manner would do nothing for solving a traffic flow
problem because after being in business ten months there has
been no problenms with traffic.
I do, however, see severe traffic problems in our parking lot
when the 40 foot tractor trailers come to deliver flour on
Tuesday and Thursdays and find that by placing these post we
have taken their area to back-up to the loading dock away.
I should also mention that U-Save uses this same area for thier
deliveries and once the post are placed these trucks will no
longer be able to use the White Street exit but instead will
be forced to use the Williston Road exit which was an original
concern of the Planning Commission.
Although I have no legal Knowledge as to right-of-ways, I
would question the legality of my closing off this right-of-way
which this site improvement condition would be asking me to do.
I would like to remind the Board that the money for this improve-
ment has been set aside in an escrow account at the Vermont National
and I am willing to comply with the condition if you so choose,
however, I would appreciate you reconcidering this condition and
allow me a variance.
Very truely,
George J. Trono
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON-
SITE PLAN APPLICATION
/57
1) OWNER OF RECORD
(name, address, phone
#) 6'Q1W4 P
CHA5 TYJAY
97111A 53uR� 2d
o s. 3ua������,�. ,
x(3 -q37-�_
2) APPLICANT (name,
_
address, phone''
�7(,d6QGE U
Rom C7
,27 i�l EN —r&- Q ,
I#ff)
�i _QLdu�X A7�V
3) CONTACT PERSON (name,
address, phone
ICOAJc)
�' ^}��
I)Qe)L0),i .
S1gMF= *,1 A 1 MA05'Ff .(
%''rr
D 411E R,j ,.
/ G
A (o.SO ot1o% ;2
4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: _ - W H I're- STkEET
5) LOT NUMBER (,if applicable)_
6) PROPOSED USE (S) _—�AL-E-L C E
7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units,
maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor)___ __ ____
8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
9) LOT COVERAGE: building _ %; landscaped areas_,;2j_ _%
building, parking, outside storage-7,_%
IN21 R/o,Q wK A (JP Rox ,
10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $3-04O(: °., , Landscaping $��P`Ox'
Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $
11) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: -AS -500k)
12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in and out)
Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours:
Monday through Fri(iav
11-1.2 noon.; l.'L-1p.m. — --; 1-2 p.m•_-- ; 2-3 p.m.
3-4 p.m. 4-5 p.m.___ ; 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m.
1 3) PEAK HOURS OF OPEIZ..'\T ION :
14) PEAK DAYS OF OPEHATION
DATE OF SUBMISSION (, A 'URE OI APPLICANT
----- �3_ t c2e> 7 �e � •lam, l58
DA`1' OF IIFARING
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
PLANNER
658-7955
October. 2, 1987
George Trono
29 College Parkway
Winooski, Vermont 05404
Re: Bagel Factory, 35 White Street
Dear Mr. Trono:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed are the minutes of the September 22, 1987 Planning
Commission meeting.
Please call me if ,you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Jane B. Lafleur,
City Planner
JBL/mcp
1 Encl
cc: Roger Dickinson
Gordon Woods
Gordon Brown
Edmund Chastenay
City of South Burlin4,1011
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
PLANNER
658.7955
December 3, 1987
George Trono
29 College Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
Dear Mr. Trono:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658.7958
Enclosed please find your copy of Findings of Fact. If you have
any questions please call me.
Sincerely,
Jam.
Jane B . Lafleur,
City Planner
JBL/mcp
1 Encl
ft, , .
CITY OF SOII'I'H BURL,INGTON
SITE PLAN APPLICATION
1) OWNER. OF RECORD (name, address, phone #) 601-nOk)Z) IA5TEMA`/
��7 111ME55_qP 6 , S. ((jPLI
2) APPLICANT (name, address, phone #)_GC=�iQ��U_ Root)
c2,"7 kjAjo1 N--- - � � L � ?G A),_V- T_. �CG - 9 () q q---------
3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone #)
n
4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: _ _WHIT NZtEET - -
5) LOT NUMBER (a f applicable)
6) PROPOSED USE
7) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e. total building square footage, # units,
maximum height and # floors, square feet per floor)___ _
_ __, L L ! X I% IV G / _ a g 9 0 s4 O,;te- rz'00 k
8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
9) LOT COVERAGE: building _�{ %; landscaped areas_%
building, parking, outside storage%
/,v R/oR wK A PP ROX .
10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $Q�d•°� Landscaping $�Qd. APPIo)
Other Site Improvements (please list with cost) $
1 l) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE:: AS 5ook) 4S__.Pos5!_./34
12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY 'TRAFFIC ( in and 'out,)
Est.imat(,d trip ends (in and orit.) during the following hours:
Monday through Fri pia v
�)( 11-12 noon 35 12-lp.m.� -; 1-2 p.rn.Q 2-3 p.m. /O
3-4 p.m. /5 1 5 p.m5- .. 5-6 p.m.��__; 6-7 p.m• CLOSEt'
1 3) Pl?AK HOURS OF (WHIMT 1 ON : 1111171--
1 4) PI:Ak DAYS OF 011E HAT I ON :
DATE OF SUBMISSION (, 'A 1'UItE OF .41'l'1.1 C''AN'I'
UA'I'F. OF 11E:f\RI NG
COLLEGE i?RxLJJY
WIKJC05K I , vi . 0.5 N0'-/
311, f-vq-kk- Of )k
/ 1 )00
q -6,0 (Y-,
MOTION OF APPROVAL
9/22/87 JBL
That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site
plan application of George Trono for conversion of the existing
building at 35 White Street to a bagel bakery and coffee shop as
depicted on plans entitled "Alterations to existing building for
new Bagel Bakery for George Trono, 35 White Street, South
Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Gordon G. Woods Associates
Architects, dated 8/10/87 with the following stipulations:
1. A $900 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit.
Additional large trees shall be planted around the building and
behind U Save Beverage in substitution for the yews. A revised
plan shall be submitted to the City Planner for approval prior to
permit. The outdoor eating area shall be removed from the plans.
Curbs around planting area shall be poured concrete, not asphalt,
wood or precast concrete.
2. A 720 gallon per day sewer allocation is granted. The $2.50
per gallon fee shall be paid prior to permit.
3. The Williston Road Driveway shall be signed and the pavement
marked for entrance only. The angle shall be changed in
conformance with VAOT standards for right turn in only. A "no
left turn" sign facing eastbound Williston Road traffic shall be
installed on Williston Road. There shall be signs and pavement
markings on -site to indicate right turn in only and no exits.
5 �Cjyx
4. The right of way shown on the plans shall be blocked on the
applicants property with bollards and landscaping or poured
concete � a�j �gs . \\
5. A J361-6"- contribution,,towards Williston Road intersection
improvements shall be paid prior to permit based on 74 trip ends
generated by this use. 5L
6. The White Street sidewalk and the Williston Road sidewalk
shall not be disturbed or if disturbed, shall be replaced with
concrete, continuous across the driveways.
7. Site drainage shall be toward the inlet in the center of the
parking lot. It shall be cleaned by the applicant prior to
opening.
8. The two currcuts on White Street shall be closed and consol-
idated iVLanca
Vi�n
t wid maximum) along the eastern property
line. d t i land shall be relocated to the west
and shat fe t in depth to meet the ordinance.
The revt nd landscaping shall be approved by the
City Engineer and City Planner prior to permit.
9. A six foot fence shall be constructed on the easterly side
next to the Muir and Taber property.
10. The building permit shall be obtained in 6 months or this
approval is null and void.
1
COMMENTS FROM CRAIG LEINER
REGARDING PROPOSED BAGEL FACTORY
35 WHITE STREET
1. The Williston Road access should be a right turn in only.
The driveway should conform to VAOT specifications.
2. The applicant should construct a curbing or bollards along
the edge of the right-of-way to stop access from the right-of-way
to this property.
3. The applicant should install a no left turn sign along
Williston Road.
4. There should be pavement markings on the Williston Road
driveway and signs to indicate a one way, entrance only and no
exits.
5. There is no clear advantage to consolidating the two curb
cuts into one along the eastern property line. The two way drive
works well with the parking layout. If one driveway is required
on White Street, the parking and circulation situation should be
reviewed carefully. (The two way drive should clearly show
which is the entrance and which is the exit.)
He agrees that there is no significant effect on the level of
service at the designated intersections. There will still be no
effect if the Williston Road access is right -turn in only.
TRAFFIC GENERATION COUNTS - MONDAY, SEPT. 21 & TUESDAY, SEPT. 22, 1987
FITZPATRICK_LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED JOB #87133
BAGEL FACTORY - COLLEGE PARKWAY, COLCHESTER
Gross Floor Area - 1,592 sq. ft.
Seating Capacity
BAGEL BAKERY - SHELBURNE ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON
Gross Floor Area - 2,904 sq. ft.
Seating Capacity - 55
BAGEL FACTORY
7:00 - 8:00 A.M. (9-22-87)
ENTER 48
EXIT 47
TOTAL ---
95
12:00 - 1:00 P.M. (9-21-87)
ENTER 40
EXIT
46
TOTAL 8--
6
4:00 - 5:00 P.M. (9-21-87)
ENTER 29
EXIT 27
TOTAL ---
56
BAGEL BAKERY
57
-57
114
19
24
43
P.M. PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION (vte/hour/1,000 sq. ft.)
35.2
14.8
P.M. PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION (vte/hour/seat)
0.78
Val — N
19
L
1%
L
IF U T-
14 A TAPW
a.
a1. D C.4 's.
ST P-S75
C0.6c..
tF
tj
wn."5C' P LC -
IL
, 1-4
or
------- . .........
L
la Of
ir
r- rHCes
I
t
.0
m
N
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: Jane B. Lafleur, City Planner
Re: September 22, 1987 agenda items
Date: September 18, 1987
2) TRONO, 35 WHITE STREET
Roger Dickinson of Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn prepared the enclosed
traffic study. Craig Leiner's comments will be available at the
meeting.
3) SUMMER WOODS, WILLIAM SHEARER, 159 PATCHEN ROAD
11
The plans are not yet available for the project. The Commission
should make a motion to continue this until the next available
meeting.
4) DESLAURIERS, 421 DORSET STREET
Charles Deslauriers proposes to construct 8 office buildings
(197,920 net square feet and 217,120 gross square feet) on the
12.79 acres of vacant land located on the west side of Dorset
Street, just north and west of the GMP substation. The property
is presently zoned Commercial -Two. The front 290 feet of this
parcel are involved in the proposed Central District Two zoning.
Development in this front area will require Conditional Use
approval by the City Council since it is in interim zoning. The
rear of the property was just warned for a public hearing on
October 6, 1987 for R7 zoning. Under R7, offices will be a
Conditional Use.
Access: Access is shown from a new public 50 foot right-of-way
directly across from San Remo Drive south. Another public 50
foot right-of-way continues Sherry Road southerly into the
property. These two roads provide a "jug handle" for traffic on
Dorset Street and will be a City street. The extension of Oak-
wood Drive should be completed by this developer to serve
existing lots.
Circulation: Circulation is shown around each building and in
parking lots that are in back of each building. A 14 foot wide
emergency access lane/pedestrian lane is shown in the middle of
the project. Chief Goddette feels this is inadequate.
Parking: Parking lots must be 60 feet wide for double loaded
spaces and aisles. Several measure more which is not necessary.
The 197,920 square feet of office space require 792 parking
spaces based on net square feet. Our parking standard requires 1
space/250 square feet of gross floor area. Based on gross area,
1
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
PLANNER
658-7955
September 18, 1987
George Trono
29 College Street
Winooski, Vermont 05404
Re: Bagel Factory, 35 White Street
Dear Mr. Trono:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed are the agenda and my memo to the Planning Commission.
Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, September 22, 1987
to represent your application.
Sincerely,
-1 C/rq_j. 4-ctj0A-C---
Jane B. Lafleur,
City Planner
JBL/mcp
Encls
cc: Roger Dickinson
Edmund Chastenay
Gordon Brown
Gordon Woods
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
PLANNER
658-7955
September 17, 1987
George Trono
29 College Street
Winooski, Vermont 05404
Re: 35 White Street
Dear Mr. Trono:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed are the minutes of the September 8, 1987 Planning
Commission meeting. Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Jane B. Lafleur,
City Planner
JBL/mcp
1 Encl
cc: Edmund Chastenay
Gordon Woods
Gordon Brown
9/8/87
JBL
MOTION OF APPROVAL
That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site
plan application of George Trono for conversion of the existing
building at 35 White Street to a bagel bakery and coffee shop as
depicted on plans entitled "Alterations to existing building for
new Bagel Bakery for George Trono, 35 White Street, South
Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Gordon G. Woods Associates
Architects, dated 8/10/87 with the following stipulations:
1. A $900. landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit.
Additional large trees shall be planted around the building and
behind U Save Beverage in substitution for the yews.
2. A 720 gallon per day sewer allocation is granted. The $2.50
per gallon fee shall be paid prior to permit.
3. The Williston Road Driveway shall be signed and the pavement
marked for entrance only. The angle shall be changed in
conformance with VAOT standards for right turn in only.
4. A $3676 contribution towards Williston Road intersection
improvement shall be paid prior to permit based on 70 trip ends
generated by this use.
5. The White Street sidewalk and the Williston Road sidewalk
shall not be disturbed.
6. Curbs around planting area shall be poured concrete, not
asphalt, wood or precast concrete.
7. Site drainage shall be toward the inlet in the center of the
parking lot. It shall be cleaned by the applicant prior to
opening.
8. The pointed island shall be rounded.
9. The building permit shall be obtained in 6 months or this
approval is null and void.
L:�' aA cf\ U)s St l J
M E M O R A N D U M
To_: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager
Re: September 8, 1987 Agenda Items
Date: September 4, 1987
2) LOT #3_ GREGORY DRIVE
1. Same comments as for earlier plan in memo of August 21, 1987.
2. Sign location.as shown on plan dated August 31, (year should
be included on all dates) is not in conformance with ordinance.
5) SOUTHSETT AT SWIFT, BRAND FARM
1. Engineers F & L prepared a good set of plans.
2. In review of the street profiles it was noted that if the
entrance to proposed Swift Street were shifted to street "B"
instead of "A" it would improve safety by moving the intersection
further away from the ledge curve and also to a point on new
Swift Street where the grade is much flatter. Lots could be
shifted accordingly. I would recommend that the change be a
field change however, the lot recorded plan should show this
change.
3. Street name and traffic signs shall be erected by the
developer upon completion of streets.
4. Utility plans, gas, telephone, electric, T.V. and street
lighting shall be submitted to the City for approval prior to any
construction. The buried electric, telephone and T.V. cable
shall be outside of the street right-of-way in a separate
easement.
6) BAGEL BAKER, WHITE STREET
1. White Street sidewalk is located adjacent to the property
line not curb as plans show. This sidewalk and the Williston
Road sidewalk shall not be disturbed. Plans are not clear as to
the intent of those locations.
2. Proposed curb around planting areas should be poured
concrete, not asphalt, wood, or precast concrete.
1
Memorandum - City Manager
September 4, 1987
Page 2
3. Site drainage shall be toward the inlet in the center of the
parking lot. (not shown on the plan) This inlet shall be
cleaned.
4. The pointed island should be rounded.
5. The Williston Road opening should be eliminated and a single
curb cut opposite the Post Office curb cut would be a big
improvement in the area.
7) KELLY AND JENNINGS, GREEN MOUNTAIN FLORIST, SWIFT STREET
1. Large truck use at this location should be discouraged.
2. A storm drainage plan shall be submitted.
3. The back area should be cleaned up and landscaped.
4. Plan should note what will be done with the front overhead
doors.
5. Frontage should include curbs and sidewalk. Sidewalk across
drives shall be 8 inches thick.
8) KIP MATHEWS, MINI -STORAGE FACILITY, 1900 WILLISTON ROAD
1. Developer should anticipate problems with using an existing
concrete slab, that was formerly used for an enclosed building
for a foundation for two smaller exposed buildings. Excessive
frost movement and cracking may result.
7
PLANNER
658-7955
George Trono
29 College Street
Winooski, Vermont
City of South Burlington
575 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403
05404
September 4, 1987
Re: Bagel Factory, 35 White Streetoad
Dear Mr. Trono:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
658-7958
Enclosed are the agenda and my comments to the Planning
Commission. Also enclosed are Bill Szymanski's comments. Please
be sure someone is present on Tuesday, September 8, 1987 to
represent your request.
Sincerely,
Jane B. Lafleur,
City Planner
JBL/mcp
Encls
cc: Edmund Chastenay
Gordon Brown
Gordon Woods
L.itlt urlt gtv�t �fitre P�tt��malt
575 flurset street
1
rnuth Nurlingtuu, liermuut 05401
�v �' �.
OFFICE OF
JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR.
CHIEF
(802)658-7960
MEMORANDUM
-----------------
TO: SO. BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: CHIEF GODDETTE
RE: TUESDAY SEPTENBER 8,1987 AGAEDA ITEMS
DATE:
#1.
#2
SEPTEMBER 3,1987
SOUTHSETT AT SWIFT. A & G INVESTMENTS
PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT
AND AT THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM FOR
THE FIRE DEPARTMENT IN GIVING EMERGENCY SERVICE.
NEW BAGEL BAKERY 35 WHITE STREET
PLANS REVIEWED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND AT
THIS TIME I DO NOT SEE A PROBLEM FOR THE
DEPARTMENT FIRE PROTECTION.
#3. GREEN MT. FLORIST SUPPLY SWIFT STREET
PLANS REVIEWED AND AT THIS TIME THE ONLY PROBLEM
I SEE IS THE TWO DRIVES FROM SWIFT STREET TO THE
BACK OF THE BUILDINGS SHOULD BE NO LESS THEN 18"
WIDE.
PLANNING COMMISSION 22 SEPTEMBER 1987
The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular
meeting on Tuesday, 22 September 1987, at 7:30 pm, in the
Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street.
Members Present
Peter Jacob, Chairman; Catherine Peacock, Mary -Barbara Maher,
William Burgess, Judith Hurd, Ann Pugh
Also Present
Jane La er, City Planner; Craig Leiner, Consultant; George
Trono, Gordon Woods, -Charles Deslauriers, Ralph Deslauriers,
James Lamphere, Dennis Webster, Terry Rossi
Review Minutes of 8 September 1987
Mrs. Hurd noted that on p. 4, item 3, the words "retaining
will" should read "retaining wall."
Mrs. Maher moved that the Minutes be approved as amended.
Mr. Belter seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
Continue site plan application of George Trono�for conversion
of existing building to a bagel bakers/coffee shop at 35
White Street
The applicant's traffic study indicates there will be no
impact on the level of service at the White St/Patchen Rd,
Williston Rd./Hinesburg Rd/Patchen Rd, and Williston
Rd./White Street/Midas road intersections when the last of
these is signalized. Their figures are based on a fast food
chain projection which is a very conservative estimate.
Craig Leiner concurs with these findings and makes the fol-
lowing recommendations: a) the Williston Rd. access be a
right turn in only and be angled according to Agency of
Transportation specs. There should be a "no left turn" sign
on Williston Rd. and a "do not enter" sign facing eastbound
traffic plus pavement markings. There should also be a "do
not exit" sign. b) Curbs and landscaping should be required
blocking off cars from going to the U-Sav lot.
Members did not agree with the Williston Rd. sign as they
felt it would have no affect. They did feel that the major
business sign should be put on White Street. Mr. Belter
stressed that if the sign is on Williston Rd, people will
feel that is the way to enter. The applicant intends to put
a sign on the building as well and Mr. Jacob suggested it
include the wording "enter on White Street."
Mr. Leiner felt there was no advantage to consolidating
driveways on White St. Members agreed the 2 drives could
PLANNING COMMISSION
15 SEPTEMBER 1987
PAGE 2
remain.
Mr. Belter noted they are presuming there will be a light on
White Street/Williston Rd/Midas Rd. If the project respon-
sible for that light isn't approved, there will be no light.
Mr. Jacob said there will then be less traffic since the
project generating so much traffic will not exist.
Mr. Trono indicated he is reluctantly going along with the
fence requested by Mr. Muir but felt he was being taken ad-
vantage of as Mr. Muir is removing the hedge to gain ad-
ditional parking spaces.
Mrs. Lafleur felt there should be some larger trees instead
of all the yews. This will be worked out.
Mrs. Hurd moved that the Planning Commission approve the site
plan application of George Trono for conversion of the ex-
isting building at 35 White Street to a bagel bakery and
coffee shop as depicted on plans entitled "Alterations to ex-
isting building for new Bagel Bakery for George Trono, 35
White Street, South Burlington, Vermont" prepared 12y Gordon G
Woods Associates Architects, dated 8/10/87 with the following
stipulations-
1. A $900 landscaping bond shall be posted prior to permit.
Additional large trees shall be planted around the building
and behind U Save Beverage in substitution for the yews. A
revised plan shall be submitted to the City Planner for ap-
proval prior to permit. The outdoor eating area shall be
removed from the plans. Curbs around planting area shall be
poured concrete, not asphalt, wood or precast concrete.
2. A gd sewer allocation is granted. The $2.50 per
gallon fee shall be paid rp for to permit.
3. The Williston Rd. driveway shall be signed and the pave-
ment marked for entrance only. The angle shall be changed in
conformance with VAOT standards for right turn in only. A
"no left turn" sign facing eastbound Williston Road traffic
shall be installed on Williston Rd. There shall be signs and
pavement marking on -site to indicate right turn in only and
no exits. There shall be a "do not enter" sign on Williston
Rd. facing eastbound traffic.
4. The right-of-way shown on the plans shall be blocked on
the applicant's property with bollards and landscaping or
poured concrete curbings.
sac y<�
5. A contribution in an amount determined 1?y the City Planner
'Aqo ,
PLANNING COMMISSION/CITY COUNCIL
22 SEPTEMBER 1987
PAGE 3
towards Williston Rd. intersection improvements shall be paid
prior to permit based on 56 trip ends generated �2y this use.
6. The White Street sidewalk and the Williston Rd. sidewalk
shall not be disturbed, or if disturbed, shall be replaced
with concrete, continuous across the driveways.
7. Site drainage shall be toward the inlet in the center of
the parking lot. It shall be cleaned 12y the applicant prior
to opening.
8. The buisness si n will be located on the island on White
Street to designate that as the main entrance.
9. A six foot fence shall be constructed on the easterly side
next to the Muir and Taber property.
10. The building permit shall be obtained in 6 months or this
approval is null and void.
3. Mrs. Maher moved that the Public Hearing for William
Shearer be continued. Mrs. Hurd seconded. Motion passed
unanimously.
4. Sketch Plan application of Charles Deslauriers for a
planned commercial development consisting of 197,920 net sq.
ft. of office space in 8 buildings on 12.8 acres located at
421 Dorset Street
Ms. Lafleur explained that the property is currently zoned C-
2. The front portion, however (290 ft. strip) is under
interim zoning and is planned for CD-3; the rear portion is
still C-2. The front section will require City Council ap-
proval as a conditional use. The project does not meet the
65 ft. setback to the residential district, but Mr.
Deslauriers said they have no problem meeting the required
distance.
Chuck Deslauriers indicated they tried to take into consid-
eration the City Center Zoning plan and also the residential
communities to the north and south. They hope their project
will serve as a role model for quality development on Droset
St. They will have extensive landscaping, and 50% of the
parking will be under the buildings. The buildings will have
a town house appearance and will be marketed as professional
offices. There will be very limited retail and food/beverage
facilities as a support for the community. This will not
generate outside traffic. The project will probably be
phased over several years.
PLANNING COMMISSION
8 SEPTEMBER 1987
PAGE 10
18. The plan shall show additional street trees along Swift
Street extension except for the first 400 feet.
19. It is the applicant's responsibility to record the
final plat (reflecting the above changes) with the City
Clerk within 90 days or this approval is null and void.
Plans must be approved � the Planner and signed 12y the
Chairman or Clerk of the Commission prior to recording.
Mr. Burgess seconded: The motion passed unanimously.
6. Site plan application of George Trono for conversion of
existing building to a bagel bakery/coffee shop located
at 35 White Street
Mr. Woods explained the area will have 32% green space, 15
parking places. There will be 5 employees. Mr. Trono said
they now have 5 employees at the St. Michael's location.
This facility would have the same seating capacity. This
woud be more of a production basis here as they would sup-
ply both bakeries with product from here. They are very
automated. There will be 24 seats for those eating on the
premisis. All of their institutional accounts are being done
out of Winooski, and all are completed by 7 AM.
Mrs. Lafleur said the small Williston Rd. curb cut will be
removed. Mr. Szymanski suggested a regular Williston Rd.
curb cut be closed; however, it is a condition of Mr.
Trono's.lease that it not be closed. Ms. Lafleur sug-
gested it be a right turn "in" only and be angled for this
purpose. Traffic coming from Burlington would naturally go
to the White St. entrance. Mr. Chastenay explained that
curb cut serves the U-Save gas station and his property. Mr.
Jacob said re -designing the curb cut wouldn't accomplish
anything and he would rather see the money spent on
landscaping.
Mr. Szymanski also prefers one curb cut on White Street.
Members agreed with one 32 foot dirve to the left side of the
property.
Mr. Muir, who owns 2 buildings adjacent to the property, said
he is concerned that a 6-foot screening fence be installed so
PLANNING COMMISSION
8 SEPTEMBER 1987
PAGE 10
they have protection against people going in and out of their
property. He felt they could work this out with the
developer.
Traffic: Mrs. Lafleur said Williston Rd. falls in overlay
zone 1 and White Street in overlay zone 5. This gives a
range of 9 to 27 trip ends allowed in peak hours. The bakery
would generate 30-70 trip ends during the peak hour based on
counts at the Winooski location. The Commission would have
to decide if changes made compensate for the excessive number
of trip ends. Mr. Trono noted Rt. 15 is the most heavily
traveled state highway in this area, and he did not antici-
pate this volume of traffic here. Mrs. Maher said with those
figures she could not, in good conscience, vote for the
project. Mrs. Lafleur said they Commission could require a
traffic study at the intersection. Other members agreed and
felt a traffic study should be done.
Mrs. Maher moved to continue the application until a traffic
study is done which will not be longer than 60 days from
tonight. Ms. Pugh seconded. Motion passed unanimously.
7. Site plan application of Robert Kelly and Charles Jennings
for conversion of existing building to warehouse, wholesale
and retail florist supplies (Green Mountain Florist Supply)
and provessional office use at the former New England Tele-
phone building, 45 Swift St.
Mr. Kelly explained this is the 3rd building up from Rt. 7 on
the right. The building is 1201x1201, most of which will be
wholesale florist. Mr. Jennings said they will close 2
driveways to the overhead doors and will grass this area
over. Most of their customers are in and out very early in
the morning, so traffic would not conflict with peak hours.
The said the back yard would be cleaned up.
Mrs. Hurd moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan
application of Robert Kelly and Charles Jennings for conver-
sion of the existing building to a wholesale florist and
office with limited storage as depicted on a plan entitled
"Green Mountain Florist Supply, Swift Street, South
Burlington" prepared i2y Freeman, French, Freeman, dated
August 26, 1987 with the following stipulations:
1. The rear of the building shall be cleaned up and
landscaped.
2. A 225 gpd sewer allocation is granted and the $2.50 per
gallon fee shall be paid prior to permit.
a
FITZPATRICK—LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Engineering and Planning Services
One Wentworth Drive 0 Williston • Vermont • 05495 • (802) 878-3000
September 16, 1987
Mr. George Trono
Bagel Factory
29 College Parkway
Colchester, Vermont 05446
RE: Traffic Impact Evaluation - 35 White Street
South Burlington
FILE: 87133
Dear Mr. Trono
At your request we have analyzed the potential traffic impacts of the
above -referenced conversion of an existing building at 35 White
Street to a bagel bakery.
This building will house a bagel bakery/coffee shop having a gross
floor area of 2,990 sq. ft. To estimate the traffic generation of
this proposed use, ITE Land Use Category 833 - Drive -In Restaurant
was used. The projected trip generation of this use is outlined
below:
Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 1,653 vte/day
A.M. Peak Hour
Enter 149
Exit 120
TOTAL 269 vte/hour
P.M. Peak Hour
Enter 51
Exit 44
TOTAL 95 vte/hour
The above trip generation was superimposed onto projected 1988 design
hourly volumes at three intersections in close proximity to this
project. Those intersections include: White Street/Patchen Road,
Williston Road/Hinesburg Road/Patchen Road, and Williston Road/White
Street/Midas. Both A.M. and P.M. peak hour conditions were analyzed.
Background traffic volumes were obtained from several sources. The
primary source was the traffic impact evaluation prepared for the
so-called Commerce Square project on the south side of Williston Road
opposite this project. The traffic volumes contained in that report
Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting • Surveying
George Trono
FILE: 87133
September 16, 1987
Page Two
were compared to the findings of the "Traffic Systems Management
Study, JHK & Associates, July 1987". Where necessary, such
information as A.M. peak hour turning movement patterns and both A.M.
and P.M. peak hour factors, were obtained from the latter report.
The signal timings and phasing used in this evaluation were obtained
from the former evaluation.
As mentioned previously, this evaluation analyses projected 1988
design hourly volumes. It also is based on the installation of
traffic signals at the Williston Road/White Street/Midas intersection
and concurrent modifications to the existing signal at the Williston
Road/Hinesburg Road/Patchen Road intersection. Those improvements
have been previously found to be warranted by the Commerce Square
project, and their construction is planned for 1988.
Appendix A illustrates the directional distribution of
project -generated traffic. This distribution was developed based on
the existing directional patterns of traffic within the study area.
In the superimposition of this traffic onto the existing street
network, it was estimated that a 35% diversion of entering traffic
from the passing streams of traffic would occur. Appendices B and C
illustrate the A.M. and P.M. design hour traffic volumes at the three
above -referenced intersections, without and with this project,
respectively.
Analyses of operating conditions at these three intersections were
performed in accordance with the methodology of "Special Report 209 -
Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 1985".
Detailed results of those analyses are enclosed as Appendices D - F.
Operating conditions with respect to traffic congestion are defined
by levels of service. The categories range from A to F, with A being
the best and F the worst. Highway design standards have established
L.O.S. C as the appropriate design condition, with L.O.S. D being
permissable on a case by case basis in urban areas. For this
evaluation, the critical test is whether or not this project will
cause a deterioration in the level of service of any of the
approaches at each intersection to below L.O.S. D.
Outlined on the following page is a summary of the "before" and
"after" levels of service at each of the three intersections.
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Engineering and Planning Services
C
George Trono
FILE: 87133
September lb, 1987
Page Three
INTERSECTION & APPROACH
White St./Patchen Rd.
Williston/Hinesburg/Patchen Rds.
LEVEL OF SERVICE
W/O PROJECT W/ PROJECT
A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M.
D D D D
Eastbound
B
B
B B
Westbound
B
C
B C
Northbound
B
B
B B
Southbound
C_
D_
C_ D
OVERALL
B
C
B C
Williston/White/Midas
Eastbound
Westbound
Northbound
Southbound
OVERALL
B D
B
D
A C
A
C
C D
C
D
C D
C
D
A D
B
D
The results of the intersection capacity analyses outlined above do
not indicate any deterioration in operating conditions after the
addition of traffic generated by this Project. It is therefore
reasonable to conclude that this Project will not adversely impact on
traffic conditions within the study area.
We wish to thank you for this opportunity to be of service.
Unfortunately, I will not be available the evening of the 22nd to
present the results of this evaluation to the South Burlington
Planning Commission. Should you have any questions, or if we may be
of additional assistance, please contact me prior to that meeting.
Sincerely,
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Rog. Dickinson, P.E.
CC. Jane LaFleurl
Craig Leiner
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Engineering and Planning Services
APPENDIX A
DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF
PROJECT —GENERATED TRAFFIC
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Engineering and Planning Services
FITZPATRICK LLEWELLY 4CORPORATED
Engineering & Planning Services
The Kiln - 15 Brickyard Road
ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452
(802) 878-3000
PRODUCT ION M es) W- Groton, M- 01411.
l c6q 133
JOB r ---
SHEET NO. {� OF RQ
CALCULATED BY `' DATE
CHECKED BY DATE_
SCALE A,/„'-rRAI'F'IC 0)si1Q18U vN
FITZPATRICK LLEWELLI NCORPORATED
Engineering & Planning Services
The Kiln - 15 Brickyard Road
ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452
(802) 878-3000
r10dICI10Fd ®xw, sue, ws. Dial.
JOB V 13 3
SHEET NO. OF GC �]
CALCULATED BY OR DATE � ` 115 —
CHECKED BY DATE_
SCALF ? M, TRAFFic, T I S—),A %I, u"R0N
APPENDIX B
1988 DHV TRAFFIC VOLUMES
WITHOUT PROJECT
C
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Engineering and Planning Services
MfY�W fI1L1 ��1.. C.r.� u... n��n
FITZPATRICK LLEWELLYN 9RPORATED
Engineering & Planning Services
r The Kiln - 15 Brickyard Road
ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452
(802) 878-3000
JOD--- --- , J / /3 3
SHEET NO.ROD DATE 7 OF
CALCULATED BY GG
CHECKED BY DATE_
19uu Ip m , V:l-jo k )4 n u IQ (n N J)
APPENDIX C
1900 DHV TRAFFIC VOLUMES
WITH PROJECT
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Engineering and Planning Services
nid v ww �pas7wr aa. w, own
FITZPATRICK LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Engineering & Planning Services
The Kiln - 15 Brickyard Road
ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452
(802) 878-3000
►Wnr.1 7M.1 rArP-iEi In &Mm M— AIA71
JOB 7/33
SHEET NO.
Of
CALCULATED BY KJ✓ DATE 9-1S-V `
APPENDIX D
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES
WHITE STREET/PATCHEN ROAD
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Engineering and Planning Services
FITZPATRICK LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
JOB
$7133
Engineering & Planning Services
The Kiln - 15 Brickyard Road
SHEET NO.
OF
ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452
(802) 878-3000
CALCULATED BY
R j'k
' :(� DATE �''�'
CHECKED BY
WAiTC
DATE—
/�
ST j ("WiCIACN'P'1� ,,f.,(ZA
SCALE
SCALE
! i
i
!:
.
i
.
j i
...... ......
i i i
...:.....................................•.............•..............:............_:.............a..............,..............i.............a.............«..........................!...........................«............_1.............i.....................
I i
................................_............................................,........
i i i
i
i..............i......... ...... .....
! i
(....
I
..... ...... ...... ..... ...... ...... ..... ...... ..... ......
i i i I I {
..... .. ................. i.............:.............:.............:.............'....._......'............
............{.......... ....a...........................; ............. .,.........,...a.............n.............b.............,..........._,.............., ... !
i ! i j !
/� ,F.r
i ! i
i
t....L...
...... ......
i
.... i.... .... j.... .._I....
...... .......................... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...._
i
I
n. i i
/'1P?k0ATCNGS i I t.IgNE
................ ............. ............................ :............................. .............. :.......... ...a..............>........ ....b...... .....< ....
!
i
A........
, ........ ........
! :
! i !
...... ...... ...... .... .....
...q...... !
i
i ! ' I
i..... ...... ...... ......
........................................................,...........................a.............,.............,..............,..............:.................. ....... ....... .......
i i i i
. .6 NaAt t`f
...... ...... ...... ..... ....... ......
...�i.... ......
....
i
...... ...... ..... ...... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... .....
!
..... ..... ...... .. .....
t....
.......................:
..........................:.. ..
:
............................ . ....
/o :.....
..........:... ......... ;.............>............., ................
.... ..... ..... .....
'Pr-2 vcc I?nvccT >.......
.....................�
'. i
... ...
.. ....
•
I�i�Tcwc� 6y'7
63,..
7U1 D
G`�
.......... ........:...............
i
........i ........ _ CS0/o
669 (s!%).
�aa C5�'/o e 61)
........................................ a ... ,..id ......43.9.5
...
.... l,. l_
.._:........:....
................................................................................................... ...... ..... ..... ..... .....
i ! ! ! i ;
... ..................
i
I I
.....
r........
... ...... ..... ..... .....
...... .. ... i...
I
.... ..... ...... ....
.............................................................................i..............k........................._........................
! i ;
! ! !
....._!.............'.............'........ ...... ..... ......
I
ii i i .._................................................!....
........................................................ ........................,.................................. .. ..
:
..............................................i............ i.......................,..
.............a.............,..............;..........................................................,.............,........ ,
! !
i !
i i i i �• i i i i i
ii i i i i
........... ............... .............w.............. ............a..........................i.......................i... ...................i....
........e..............i........................ ._i........... ...i............. i....... ...... .i....... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ......
.. ..,
i i i i
i i j
...... ...... ...... ..... ....... ......
I ;
! .... ...... ......
! e .....i.... ........
!
i..... .
... ...... ..... ....... ......
..... ...... ......
I
...... ..... ._... .......................
i i I i i
..... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... .....
e .
.... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... .....
...... ...... ...... i....
!
i
...¢....
I
..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... .....
...... ...... ..... ..... ...... ...... ........ .....
......
...... ...... ........................................
i
i i
.. ..... ..... ...... ...... .....
............i.............d.............i..............b..............._.......................!..............i............. i...........e.
i i i i i i
! ! ! ! ! !
!i
.............................................................i..............i......................
i i i i i i i i i i
i
.......:..............
......... ...e............. ..! , a e a a , ,
I
............h............'
............e.............a..........._b............. a............. .:.............:......................................_i............. %....... ...... .....
i ... ....
.............:.........................................................a............. i.. ....... y.. r : ... !.... ...... ......
i i i i i i i
i i i
i
i i i i i
........................................................................................................................'..............!..............i.......
...... ...... ...... ..... ....... .....
............_....
I
.
..... ..... ...... ......
..... ...... .....
....... ......
..... ...... ...... ..... .............
....7........q....
...... ...... ..... ..........
... .... ...d.... ...b....
.. ..... ..... ......
.. .... '.... .._ir... ....%...
..... ..................{ .......................... ._...... ...... ..... .....
................... .
...... ..... ..................................
!
...... ...... ..... ..... ..... ..... .........
I
I
..... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... .. ... ... .... ......
..... ..... ..... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... .....
....{.... ....`...
........................................
..... ............. ...... ...... ..... ... ..... .... .....
....b.... ...•. ..... ..... ...... ..... ...... ...... ...... ..... .....
.._i.... ... i.... ... ....
...'..........'........................................`............. i.......... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ........................
............e.......... . ... a a , a ............j....
! ! ! ! ! ! ...' ..... ...... ...... ...... ......
..
.........................................................................................................._i.............5............
......................................................................................................................................
...... ...... ..... ....... ......
..... ..... ...... ..... ...... ......
i.............. j... ......
1
..... ..... ..... ...................... ...... ...... ..... .....
i
...... ...... ..... .....................�. ...... ...... ...... ....
...... ...... ............. p.... ....�....
PRODUCT ZIN•I 7Inc.. G,.W. Mm. 01471
- ------- --- -- m
IIE;k
. . ...... . .. .... ..
JOL
APPENDIX E
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES
WILLISTON/HINESHURG/PATCHEN ROADS
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Engineering and Planning Services
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
**********************************************************************
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
======================================================================
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ......... WILLISTON ROAD
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ....... HINESBURG/PATCHEN
AREA TYPE ............................ OTHER
NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. R. DICKINSON
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ................. 9-16-87
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. 1988 A.M. DHV
OTHER INFORMATION:
W/O PROJECT
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
======================================================================
EB
WB
NB SD
LEFT
_____
2
_____
17
_____
279 129
THRU
564
657
185 186
RIGHT
139
87
45 21
RTOR
0
0
0 0
(RTOR volume must be less than or equal to RIGHT turn volumes.)
INTERSECTION GEOMETRY
======================================================================
Page-2
NUMBER
OF LANES PER DIRECTION
INCLUDING
TURN BAYS:
EASTBOUND
= 2 WESTBOUND =
2
NORTHBOUND = 2
SOUTHBOUND = 1
EB WB
NB
SB
LANE
TYPE WIDTH TYPE
.... ..... ..... .... .... __
WIDTH
TYPE WIDTH
TYPE WIDTH
1
LT 12.0 LT
_.... .....
12.0
____ _____
L 12.0
____ _____
LTR 12.0
2
TR 12.0 TR
12.0
TR 12.0
12.0
3
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
4
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
5
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
6
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
L
- EXCLUSIVE LEFT LANE
T - EXCLUSIVE
THROUGH LANE
LT
- LEFT/THROUGH LANE
TR - THROUGH/RIGHT
LANE
LR
- LEFT/RIGHT ONLY LANE
R - EXCLUSIVE
RIGHT LANE
LTR
- LEFT/THROUGH/RIGHT LANE
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
GRADE HEAVY VEH.
ADJACENT
PKG BUSES
(%) (%)
__________
Y/N
(Nm) (Nb)
PHF
EASTBOUND
0.00 2.00
___
N
____ ____
0 2
-----
0.85
WESTBOUND
0.00 2.00
N
0 2
0.85
NORTHBOUND
0.00 2.00
N
0 2
0.85
SOUTHBOUND
0.00 2.00
N
0 2
0.85
Nm = number
of parking maneuvers/hr; Nb
= number of
buses stopping/hr
CONFLICTING PEDS
PEDESTRIAN BUTTON
(peds/hour)
________________
(Y/N)
(min T)
ARRIVAL TYPE
EASTBOUND
50
_________________
N
16.8
--------------
3
WESTBOUND
50
N
16.8
3
NORTHBOUND
50
N
19.8
3
SOUTHBOUND
50
N
19.8
3
min T = minimum green time for pedestrians
SIGNAL SETTINGS - DESIGN ANALYSIS Page-3
======================================================================
PRETIMED LOST TIME/CYCLE = 6.0 CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0
EAST/WEST PHASING
______________________________________________________________________
PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4
EASTBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
WESTBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
NORTHBOUND RT
SOUTHBOUND RT
NORTH/SOUTH PHASING
______________________________________________________________________
PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4
NORTHBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
SOUTHBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
EASTBOUND RT
WESTBOUND RT
EFFECTIVE GREENS - DESIGN ANALYSIS Page-4
`
EFFECTIVE GREEN, g
---------------------
EASTBOUND
LEFT
Permitted 30.00
Protected 0.00
THRU 30.00
RIGHT
Permitted 30.00
Protected 0.00
WESTBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
30.00
Protected
0.00
THRU
30.00
RIGHT
Permitted
30.00
Protected
0.00
NORTHBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
24.00
Protected
0.00
THRU
24.00
RIGHT
Permitted
24.00
Protected
0.00
SOUTHBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
24.00
Protected
0.00
THRU
24.00
RIGHT
Permitted
24.00
Protected
0.00
VOLUME
ADJUSTMENT
WORKSHEET
Page-5
LANE
LANE
ADJ.
MVT.
ADJ.
LANE
GRP.
NO.
UTIL.
GROWTH
GRP.
PROP
PROP
VOL.
____
PHF
____
VOL.
GRP.
VOL.
LN
FACT.
FACT.
VOL.
LT
RT
EB
____
____
____
__
_____
______
____
____
____
LT
2
0.85
2
TH
564
0,85
664
LTR
829
2
1.050
1.000
871
0'00
0.20
RT
139
0.85
164
WB
LT
17
0.85
20
TH
657
0.85
773
LTR
895
2
1.050
1.000
940
0.02
0.11
RT
87
0.85
102
NB
LT
279
0.85
328
L
328
1
1.000
1.000
328
1.00
0.00
TH
185
0.85
218
TR
271
1
1.000
1.000
271
0.00
0.20
RT
45
0.85
53
SB
LT 129 0.85 152
TH 186 0.85 219 LTR 395 1 1.000 1.000 395 0.38 0.06
RT 21 0.85 25
* Denotes a Defacto Left Turn Lane Group
SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Page-6
IDEAL ADJ.,
SAT. NO. f f f f f f f f SAT.
FLOW LNS W HV G p BB A RT LT FLOW
____ ___ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ____
EB
LTR 1800
WB
LTR 1800
NB
L 1800
TR 1800
SB
LTR 1800
2 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.996 1.000 0.966 1.000 3428
2 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.996 1.000 0.980 0.956 3325
1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.617 1100
1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.992 1.000 0.966 1.000 1708
1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.992 1.000 0.890 0.819 1288
CAPACITY
======================================================================
ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
Page-7
ADJ.
ADJ. SAT.
FLOW
LANE GROUP
FLOW RATE
FLOW RATE
RATIO
GREEN RATIO
CAPACITY
v/c
(v)
(s)
_________
(v/s)
_____
(g/C)
___________
(c)
__________
RATIO
_____
EB
_________
LTR
871
3428
0.254
0.500
1714
0.508
WB
LTR
940
3325
0.283
0.500
1663
0.565 *
NB
L
328
1100
0.298
0.400
440
0.746
TR
271
1708
0.158
0.400
683
0.396
SB
LTR
395
1288
0.307
0.400
515
0.767 *
Cycle Length,
C = 60.0
sec.
Sum (v/s)
critical = 0.590
Lost Time
Per Cycle,
L = 6.0
sec.
X critical
= 0.655
LEVEL -OF -SERVICE WORKSHEET
======================================================================
Page-8
DELAY
LANE
DELAY
LANE
LANE
DELAY
LOS
v/c
g/C
CYCLE
d
GROUP
d
PROG.
GRP.
GRP.
BY
BY
RATIO
_____
RATIO
_____
LEN.
_____
1
CAP.
2
FACT.
DELAY
LOS
APP.
APP.
EB
_____
_____
_____
_____
_____
____
_____
____
LTR
0.508
0.500
60.0
7.6
1714
0.2
1.00
7.9
B
7.9
B
WB
LTR
0.565
0.500
60.0
7.9
1663
0.3
1.00
8.3
B
8.3
B
NB
L
0.746
0.400
60.0
11.7
440
4.7
1.00
16.4
C
13.5
B
TR
0.396
0.400
60.0
9.8
683
0.2
1.00
10.0
B
SD
LTR
0.767
0.400
60.0
11.8
515
4.7
1.00
16.6
C
16.6
C
Intersection
Delay
= 10.4
(sec/veh)
Intersection LOS
= B
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
======================================================================
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ......... WILLISTON ROAD
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ....... HINESBURG/PATCHEN
AREA TYPE ............................ OTHER
NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. R. DICKINSON
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ................. 9-16-87
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. 1988 P.M. DHV
OTHER INFORMATION:
W/O PROJECT
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
======================================================================
EB WB NB SB
_____ _____ _____
LEFT 11 68 178 99
THRU 722 847 170 256
RIGHT 222 119 121 29
RTOR 0 0 0 0
(RTOR volume must be less than or equal to RIGHT turn volumes.)
INTERSECTION GEOMETRY Page-2
NUMBER OF LANES PER DIRECTION INCLUDING TURN BAYS
EASTBOUND = 2 WESTBOUND =
2 NORTHBOUND = 2
SOUTHBOUND = 1
EB W8
NB
SB
LANE
TYPE WIDTH TYPE
WIDTH
TYPE WIDTH
TYPE WIDTH
J.
LT 12.0 LT
12.0
L 12.0
LTR 12.0
2
TR 12.0 TR
12.0
TR 12.0
12.0
3
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
4
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
5
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
6
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
L -
EXCLUSIVE LEFT LANE
T - EXCLUSIVE
THROUGH LANE
LT -
LEFT/THROUGH LANE
TR - THROUGH/RIGHT
LANE
LR -
LEFT/RIGHT ONLY LANE
R - EXCLUSIVE
RIGHT LANE
LTR -
LEFT/THROUGH/RIGHT LANE
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
GRADE HEAVY VEH. ADJACENT PKG BUSES
(%) (%) Y/N (Nm) (Nb) PHI:---'
_______ ___ ____ ____ ----
EASTBOUND 0.00 2.00 N 0 2 0.92
WESTBOUND 0.00 2.00 N 0 2 0.91
NORTHBOUND 0.00 2.00 N 0 2 0.93
SOUTHBOUND 0.00 2.00 N 0 2 0.80
Nm = number of parking maneuvers/hr; Nb = number of buses stopping/hr
CONFLICTING PEDS PEDESTRIAN BUTTON
(peds/hour) (Y/N) (min T) ARRIVAL TYPE
________________ _________________ ____________
EASTBOUND 50 N 11.5 3
WESTBOUND 50 N 11.5 3
NORTHBOUND 50 N 14.5 3
SOUTHBOUND 50 N 14.5 3
min T = minimum green time for pedestrians
SIGNAL SETTINGS - DESIGN ANALYSIS Page-3
======================================================================
PRETIMED LOST TIME/CYCLE = 6.0 CYCLE LENGTH = 70.0
EAST/WEST PHASING
______________________________________________________________________
PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4
EASTBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
WESTBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
NORTHBOUND RT
SOUTHBOUND RT
NORTH/SOUTH PHASING
______________________________________________________________________
PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4
NORTHBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
SOUTHBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
EASTBOUND RT
WESTBOUND RT
EFFECTIVE GREENS - DESIGN ANALYSIS Page-4
======================================================================
EFFECTIVE GREEN, g
-------------------
EASTBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
37.00
Protected
0.00
THRU
37.00
RIGHT
Permitted
37.00
Protected
0.00
WESTBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
37.00
Protected
0.00
THRU
37.00
RIGHT
Permitted
37.00
Protected
0.00
NORTHBOUND
Permitted 27.00
Protected 0.00
THRU 27.00
RIGHT
Permitted 27.00
Protected 0.00
SOUTHBOUND
LEFT
Permitted 27.00
Protected 0.00
THRU 27.00
RIGHT
Permitted 27.00
Protected 0.00
VOLUME
======================================================================
ADJUSTMENT
WORKSHEET
Page-5
LANE
LANE
ADJ.
MVT.
ADJ.
LANE
GRP.
NO.
UTIL.
GROWTH
GRP.
PROP
PROP
VOL.
PHF
VOL.
GRP.
VOL.
LN
FACT.
FACT.
VOL.
LT
RT
EB
____
____
____
____
____
__
_____
______
____
____
____
LT
11
0.92
12
TH
722
0.92
785
LTR
1038
2
1.050
1.000
1090
0.01
0.23
RT
222
0.92
241
WB
LT
68
0.91
75
TH
847
0.91
931
LTR
1136
2
1.050
1.000
1193
0.07
0.12
RT
119
0.91
131
NB
LT
178
0.93
191
L
191
1
1.000
1.000
191
1.00
0.00
TH
170
0.93
183
TR
313
1
1.000
1.000
313
0.00
0.42
RT
121
0.93
130
SB
LT
99
0.80
124
TH
256
0.80
320
LTR
480
1
1.000
1.000
480
0.26
0.08
RT
29
0.80
36
* Denotes a Defacto Left Turn Lane Group
SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Page -
IDEAL ADJ.
SAT. NO. f f f f f f f f SAT.
FLOW LNS W HV G p BB A RT LT FLOW
_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ____
EB
LTR 1800
WB
LTR 1800
2 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.996 1.000 0.960 0.867 2953
2 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.996 1.000 0.980 0.722 2513
NB
L 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.450 802
TR 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.992 1.000 0.928 1.000 1640
SD
LTR 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.992 1.000 0.888 0.820 1287
CAPACITY
======================================================================
ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
Page--�
ADJ.
ADJ. SAT.
FLOW
LANE GROUP
FLOW RATE
FLOW RATE
RATIO
GREEN RATIO
CAPACITY
v/c
(v)
(s)
(v/s)
(g/C)
___________
(c)
RATIO
EB
_________
_________
_____
__________
_____
LTR
1090
2953
0.369
0.529
1561
0.698
WB
LTR
1193
2513
0.475
0.529
1328
0.898 *
NB
L
191
802
0.239
0.386
309
0.619
TR
313
1640
0.191
0.386
633
0.495
SB
LTR
480
1287
0.373
0.386
496
0.967 *
Cycle Length,
C =
70.0 sec.
Sum (v/s)
critical = 0.848
Lost Time
Per Cycle,
L = 6.0
sec.
X critical
= 0.927
LEVEL -OF -SERVICE WORKSHEET Page-8
DELAY LANE DELAY LANE LANE DELAY LOS
v/c g/C CYCLE d GROUP d PROG. GRP. GRP. BY BY
RATIO RATIO LEN. 1 CAP. 2 FACT. DELAY LOS APP. APP.
_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____ ____
EB
LTR 0.698 0.529 70.0 9.4 1561 1.0 1.00 10.4 B 10.4 B
WB
LTR 0.898 0.529 70.0 11.3 1328 6.1 1.00 17.4 C 17.4 C
NB
L 0.619 0.386 70.0 13.2 309 2.6 1.00 15.8 C 14.0 B
TR 0.495 0.386 70.0 12.4 633 0.5 1.00 12.9 B
SB
LTR 0.967 0.386 70.0 16.0 496 23.7 1.00 39.7 D 39.7 D
Intersection Delay = 17.8 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page -
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
======================================================================
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ......... WILLISTON ROAD
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ....... HINESBURG/PATCHEN
AREA TYPE ............................ OTHER
NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. R. DICKINSON
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ................. 9-16-87
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. 1988 A.M. DHV
OTHER INFORMATION:
W/ PROJECT
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
EB
_____
WB
_____
NB
SB
LEFT
2
17
_____
291
129
THRU
595
686
185
186
RIGHT
147
87
45
21
RTOR
0
0
0
0
(RTOR
volume must
be less than or
equal to RIGHT
turn volumes.)
INTERSECTION GEOMETRY Page-2
======================================================================
NUMBER OF LANES PER DIRECTION
INCLUDING TURN BAYS:
EASTBOUND = 2 WESTBOUND =
2
NORTHBOUND = 2
SOUTHBOUND = 1
`
EB WB
NB
SB
LANE
____
TYPE WIDTH TYPE
____ _____
WIDTH
_____
TYPE WIDTH
____ _____
TYPE WIDTH
____
1
____
LT 12.0 LT
12.0
L 12.0
_____
LTR 12.0
2
TR 12.0 TR
12.0
TR 12.0
12.0
3
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
4
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
5
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
6
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
L -
EXCLUSIVE LEFT LANE
T - EXCLUSIVE
THROUGH LANE
LT -
LEFT/THROUGH LANE
TR - THROUGH/RIGHT
LANE
LR -
LEFT/RIGHT ONLY LANE
R - EXCLUSIVE
RIGHT LANE
LTR -
LEFT/THROUGH/RIGHT LANE
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
======================================================================
GRADE
HEAVY VEH.
ADJACENT PKG
BUSES
(%)
(%)
__________
Y/N
___
(Nm)
____
(Nb)
____
PHF
EASTBOUND
..... __..... _
0.00
2'00
N
0
2
0.85
WESTBOUND
0.00
2.00
N
0
2
0.85
NORTHBOUND
0.00
2.00
N
0
2
0.85
SOUTHBOUND
0.00
2.00
N
0
2
0.85
Nm = number
of parking
maneuvers/hr;
Nb = number
of
buses stopping/hr
CONFLICTING
PEDS
PEDESTRIAN
BUTTON
(peds/hour)
(Y/N)
(min T)
ARRIVAL TYPE
EASTBOUND
________________
50
_________________
N
16.8
--------------
3
WESTBOUND
50
N
16.8
3
NORTHBOUND
50
N
19.8
3
SOUTHBOUND
50
N
19.8
3
min T = minimum green
time for
pedestrians
SIGNAL SETTINGS - DESIGN ANALYSIS Page-3
======================================================================
PRETIMED LOST TIME/CYCLE = 6.0 CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0
EAST/WEST PHASING
______________________________________________________________________
PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4
EASTBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
WESTBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
NORTHBOUND RT
SOUTHBOUND RT
NORTH/SOUTH PHASING
_________________________________________________________________
PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4
NORTHBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
SOUTHBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
EASTBOUND RT
WESTBOUND RT
EFFECTIVE GREENS - DESIGN ANALYSIS Page-4
EFFECTIVE GREEN, g
__________________
EASTBOUND
LEFT
Permitted 30.00
Protected 0.00
THRU 30.00
RIGHT
Permitted 30.00
Protected 0.00
WESTBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
30.00
Protected
0.00
THRU
30.00
RIGHT
Permitted
30.00
Protected
0.00
NORTHBOUND
LEFT
Permitted 24.00
Protected 0.00
THRU 24.00
RIGHT
Permitted 24.00
Protected 0.00
SOUTHBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
24.00
Protected
0.00
THRU
24.00
RIGHT
Permitted
24.00
Protected
0'00
VOLUME
======================================================================
ADJUSTMENT
WORKSHEET
Page-�
LANE
LANE
ADJ.
MVT.
ADJ. LANE
GRP. NO.
UTIL.
GROWTH GRP.
PROP PROF
VOL.
PHF
VOL. GRP.
VOL. LN
FACT.
FACT, VOL.
LT RT
EB
LT
2
0.85
2
TH
595
0.85
700 LTR
875 2
1.050
1.000 919
0.00 0.2{
RT
147
0.85
173
WB
LT 17 0.85
TH 686 0.85
RT 87 0.85
NB
LT 291 0.85
TH 185 0.85
RT 45 0.85
SD
LT 129 0.85
TH 186 0.85
RT 21 0.85
20
807 LTR 929 2 1.050 1.000 976 0.02 0.11
102
342 L 342 1 1.000 1.000 342 1.00 0.0[
218 TR 271 1 1.000 1.000 271 0.00 0.2{
53
152
219 LTR 395 1 1,000 1.000 395 0.38 0.06
25
* Denotes a Defacto Left Turn Lane Group
SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Page-6
=======================================================================
IDEAL ADJ.
SAT. NO. f f f f f f f f SAT.
FLOW LNS W HV G p BB A RT LT FLOW
____ ___ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ____
EB
LTR 1800
WB
LTR 1800
NB
L 1800
TR 1800
SB
LTR 1800
2 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.996 1.000 0.966 1.000 3428
2 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.996 1.000 0.981 0.947 3298
1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.617 1100
1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.992 1.000 0.966 1.000 1708
1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1,000 0.992 1.000 0.890 0.819 1288
CAPACITY
======================================================================
ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
Page-7
ADJ.
ADJ. SAT.
FLOW
LANE GROUP
FLOW RATE
FLOW RATE
RATIO
GREEN RATIO
CAPACITY
v/c
(v)
(s)
(v/s)
(g/C>
(c)
RATIO
EB
_________
_________
_____
___________
__________
_____
LTR
919
3428
0.268
0.500
1714
0.536
WB
LTR
976
3298
0.296
0.500
1649
0.592 *
NB
L
342
1100
0.311
0.400
440
0.778 *
TR
271
1708
0.158
0.400
683
0.396
SB
LTR
395
1288
0.307
0.400
515
0.767
Cycle Length,
C =
60.0 sec.
Sum (v/s) critical = 0.607
Lost Time
Per Cycle,
L = 6.0
sec.
X critical =
0.675
LEVEL -OF -SERVICE WORKSHEET
Page-8
DELAY
LANE
DELAY
LANE
LANE
DELAY
LOS
v/c
g/C
CYCLE d
GROUP
d
PROG.
GRP.
GRP.
BY
BY
RATIO
RATIO
_____
LEN. 1
_____ _____
CAP.
_____
2
_____
FACT.
_____
DELAY
_____
LOS
____
APP.
_____
APP.
____
EB
_____
LTR
0.536
0.500
60.0 7.8
1714
0.3
1.00
8.1
B
8.1
B
WB
LTR
0.592
0.500
60.0 8.1
1649
0.4
1.00
8.5
B
8.5
B
NB
L
0.778
0.400
60.0 11.9
440
5.9
1'00
17.8
C
14.4
B
TR
0.396
0.400
60.0 9.8
683
0'2
1.00
10.0
B
SD
LTR
0,767
0.400
60.0 11.8
515
4.7
1.00
16.6
C
16.6
C
Intersection
Delay
= 10.7 (sec/veh)
Intersection LOS =
B
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page -
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ......... WILLISTON ROAD
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ....... HINESBURG/PATCHEN
AREA TYPE ............................. OTHER
NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. R' DICKINSON
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ................. 9-16-87
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. 1988 P.M. DHV
OTHER INFORMATION:
W/ PROJECT
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
EB
WB
NB
SB
LEFT
11
_____
68
_____
180
-----
99
THRU
733
858
170
256
RIGHT
226
119
121
29
RTOR
0
0
0
0
(RTOR volume
must
be less than
or equal to
RIGHT turn volumes.)
INTERSECTION GEOMETRY
Page-2
NUMBER OF LANES PER DIRECTION
INCLUDING
TURN BAYS:
EASTBOUND = 2 WESTBOUND =
2
NORTHBOUND = 2
SOUTHBOUND = 1
EB WB
NB
SB
LANE TYPE WIDTH TYPE
WIDTH
TYPE WIDTH
TYPE WIDTH
1 LT 12.0 LT
12.0
L 12.0
..... ... .... ..... _
LTR 12.0
2 TR 12.0 TR
12.0
TR 12'0
12'0
3 12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
A. 12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
5 12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
6 12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT LANE
T - EXCLUSIVE
THROUGH LANE -
LT - LEFT/THROUGH LANE
TR - THROUGH/RIGHT
LANE
LR - LEFT/RIGHT ONLY LANE
R - EXCLUSIVE
RIGHT LANE
LTR - LEFT/THROUGH/RIGHT LANE
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
GRADE HEAVY VEH.
ADJACENT
PKG
BUSES
(%> (%)
__________
Y/N
(Nm)
(Nb)
PHI--:'
EASTBOUND
0.00 2.00
___
N
____
0
____
2
----
0.92
WESTBOUND
0.00 2.00
N
0
2
0.91
NORTHBOUND
0.00 2.00
N
0
2
0.93
SOUTHBOUND
0.00 2.00
N
0
2
0.80
Nm = number
of parking maneuvers/hr;
Nb
= number of
buses stopping/hi-
CONFLICTING PEDS
PEDESTRIAN
BUTTON
`
(peds/hour)
________________
(Y/N)
(min T)
ARRIVAL TYPE
EASTBOUND
50
_________________
N
11'5
--------------
3
WESTBOUND
50
N
11.5
3
NORTHBOUND
50
N
14.5
3
SOUTHBOUND
50
N
14.5
3
min T = minimum green time for pedestrians
SIGNAL SETTINGS - DESIGN ANALYSIS Page-3
======================================================================
PRETIMED LOST TIME/CYCLE = 6.0 CYCLE LENGTH = 70.0
EAST/WEST PHASING
______________________________________________________________________
PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4
EASTBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
WESTBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
NORTHBOUND RT
SOUTHBOUND RT
NORTH/SOUTH PHASING
______________________________________________________________________
PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4
NORTHBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
SOUTHBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
EASTBOUND RT
WESTBOUND RT
EFFECTIVE GREENS - DESIGN ANALYSIS Page-4
======================================================================
EFFECTIVE GREEN, g
-------------------
EASTBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
37.00
Protected
0.00
THRU
37.00
RIGHT
Permitted
37.00
Protected
0.00
WESTBOUND
LEFT
Permitted 37.00
Protected 0.00
THRU 37.00
RIGHT
Permitted 37.00
Protected 0.00
NORTHBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
27.00
Protected
0.00
THRU
27.00
RIGHT
Permitted
27.00
Protected
0.00
SOUTHBOUND
Permitted
27.00
Protected
0.00
THRU
27.00
RIGHT
Permitted
27.00
Protected
0.00
VOLUME
======================================================================
ADJUSTMENT
WORKSHEET
Page-5
LANE
LANE
ADJ.
MVT.
ADJ.
LANE
GRP. NO.
UTIL.
GROWTH
GRP.
PROP
PROP
VOL.
____
PHF
____
VOL.
____
GRP.
____
VOL. LN
FACT.
FACT.
VOL.
LT
RT
EB
____ __
_____
______
____
____
____
LT
11
0.92
12
TH
733
0.92
797
LTR
1054 2
1.050
1.000
1107
0.01
0.23
RT
226
0.92
246
WB
LT
68
0.91
75
TH
858
0.91
943
LTR
1148 2
1.050
1.000
1206
0.07
0.11
RT
119
0.91
131
NB
LT
180
0.93
194
L
194 1
1.000
1.000
194
1.00
0.00
TH
170
0.93
183
TR
313 1
1.000
1.000
313
0.00
0.42
RT
121
0.93
130
SB
LT
99
0.80
124
TH
256
0.80
320
LTR
480 1
1.000
1.000
480
0.26
0.08
RT
29
0.80
36
* Denotes a Defacto Left Turn Lane Group
SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET
=======================================================================
Page-6
IDEAL
ADJ.
SAT.
NO. f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
SAT.
FLOW
____
LNS W
___ _____
HV
_____
G
_____
p
_____
_____
BB
A
RT
LT
FLOW
EB
_____
_____
_____
____
LTR
1800
2 1.000
0.990
1.000
1.000
0.996
1.000
0.960
0.860
2930
WB
LTR
1800
2 1.000
0.990
1.000
1.000
0.996
1.000
0.980
0.714
2484
NB
L
1800
1 1.000
0.990
1.000
1.000
1.()00
1.000
1.000
0.450
802
TR
1800
1 1.000
0.990
1.000
1.000
0.992
1.000
0.928
1.000
1640
SD
LTR
1800
1 1.000
0.990
1.000
1.000
0.992
1.000
0.888
0.820
1287
CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
======================================================================
Page-7
ADJ.
ADJ. SAT.
FLOW
LANE GROUP
FLOW RATE
FLOW RATE
RATIO
GREEN RATIO
CAPACITY
v/c
(v)
(s)
(v/s)
(g/C)
(c)
RATIO
EB
LTR 1107
2930
0.378
0.529
1549
0.715
WB
LTR
1206
2484
0.485
NB
L
194
802
0.241
TR
313
1640
0.191
SB
LTR
480
1287
0.373
Cycle Length,
C = 70.0
sec.
Lost Time Per
Cycle, L
= 6.0
sec.
,
0.529 1313 0.918 *
0.386 309 0.626
0.386 633 0.495
0.386 496 0.967 *
Sum (v/s) critical = 0.858
X critical = 0.939
LEVEL -OF -SERVICE WORKSHEET Page-8
======================================================================
DELAY LANE DELAY LANE LANE DELAY LOS
v/c g/C CYCLE d GROUP d PROG. GRP. GRP. BY BY
RATIO RATIO LEN. 1 CAP. 2 FACT. DELAY LOS APP. APP.
_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____ ____
EB
LTR 0.715 0.529 70.0 9.5 1549
WB
LTR 0.918 0.529 70.0 11.5 1313
1.1 1.00 10.6 B 10.6 B
7.6 1.00 19.1 C 19.1 C
NB
L 0.626 0.386 70.0 13.2 309 2.8 1.00 16.0 C 14.1 B
TR 0.495 0.386 70.0 12.4 633 0.5 1.00 12.9 B
SB
LTR 0.967 0.386 70.0 16.0 496 23.7 1.00 39.7 D 39.7 D
Intersection Delay = 18.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = C
APPENDIX F
INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES
WILLISTON/WHITE/MIDAS
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Engineering and Planning Services
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
**********************************************************************
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
======================================================================
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ......... WILLISTON RD.
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ....... MIDAS/WHITE
AREA TYPE ............................ OTHER
NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. R. DICKINSON
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ................. 9-16-87 '
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. 1988 A.M. DHV
OTHER INFORMATION:
W/O PROJECT
[RAFFIC VOLUMES
EB WB NB SB
_____ _____ _____ -----
LEFT 163 6 3 0
THRU 749 905 0 0
RIGHT 5 0 2 247
RTOR 0 0 0 180
(RTOR volume must be less than or equal to RIGHT turn volumes.)
INTERSECTION GEOMETRY Page-2
======================================================================
NUMBER OF LANES PER DIRECTION
INCLUDING TURN BAYS:
EASTBOUND = 2 WESTBOUND =
2
NORTHBOUND = 2
SOUTHBOUND = 1
EB WB
NB
SD
LANE
TYPE WIDTH TYPE
WIDTH
TYPE WIDTH
TYPE WIDTH
1
LT 12.0 LT
12.0
LT 12.0
R 12.0
2
TR 12.0 TR
12.0
R 12.0
12.0
3
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
4
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
5
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
6
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
L -
EXCLUSIVE LEFT LANE
T - EXCLUSIVE
THROUGH LANE
LT -
LEFT/THROUGH LANE
TR - THROUGH/RIGHT
LANE
LR -
LEFT/RIGHT ONLY LANE
R - EXCLUSIVE
RIGHT LANE
LTR -
LEFT/THROUGH/RIGHT LANE
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
GRADE HEAVY VEH.
ADJACENT
PKG
BUSES
(%) (%)
_____ __________
Y/N
(Nm)
(Nb)
PHF
EASTBOUND
0.00 2.00
___
N
____
0
____
2
----
0.85
WESTBOUND
0.00 2.00
N
0
2
0.85
NORTHBOUND
0.00 2.00
N
0
2
0.85
SOUTHBOUND
0.00 2.00
N
0
2
0.85
Nm = number
of parking maneuvers/hr;
Nb
= number
of
buses stopping/hr
CONFLICTING PEDS
PEDESTRIAN
BUTTON
(peds/hour)
________________
(Y/N)
(min T)
ARRIVAL TYPE
EASTBOUND
50
_________________
N
16.8
____________
3
WESTBOUND
50
N
16.8
3
NORTHBOUND
50
N
19.8
3
SOUTHBOUND
50
N
19.8
3
min T = minimum green time for pedestrians
SIGNAL SETTINGS - DESIGN ANALYSIS Page-3
======================================================================
SEMI -ACTUATED LOST TIME/CYCLE = 6.0 CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0
EAST/WEST PHASING
______________________________________________________________________
PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4
EASTBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
WESTBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
NORTHBOUND RT
SOUTHBOUND RT
NORTH/SOUTH PHASING
______________________________________________________________________
PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4
NORTHBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
SOUTHBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT X
PEDS X
EASTBOUND RT
WESTBOUND RT
EFFECTIVE GREENS - DESIGN ANALYSIS Page-4
======================================================================
EFFECTIVE GREEN, g
--------------------
EASTBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
43.00
Protected
0.00
THRU
43.00
RIGHT
Permitted
43.00
Protected
0.00
WESTBOUND
Permitted 43.00
Protected 0.00
THRU 43.00
RIGHT
Permitted 43.00
Protected 0.00
NORTHBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
0.00
Protected
11.00
THRU
11.00
RIGHT
Permitted
11.00
Protected
0.00
SOUTHBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
0.00
Protected
0.00
THRU
0.00
RIGHT
Permitted
11.00
Protected
0.00
VOLUME
======================================================================
ADJUSTMENT
WORKSHEET
Page-5
LANE
LANE
ADJ.
MVT.
ADJ.
LANE
GRP. NO.
UTIL.
GROWTH
GRP.
PROP
PROP
VOL.
____
PHF
____
VOL.
____
GRP.
____
VOL. LN
____
FACT.
FACT.
VOL.
LT
RT
EB
__
_____
______
____
____
____
LT
163
0.85
192
*L
192 1
1.000
1.000
192
1.00
0.00
TH
749
0.85
881
TR
887 1
1.000
1.000
887
0.00
0.00
RT
5
0.85
6
WB
LT
6
0.85
7
TH
905
0.85
1065
LTR
1072 2
1.050
1.000
1125
0.01
0.00
RT
0
0.85
0
NB
LT
3
0.85
4
TH
0
0.85
0
LT
4 1
1.000
1.000
4
1.00
0.00
RT
2
0.85
2
R
2 1
1.000
1.000
2
0.00
1.00
SB
LT 0 0.85
TH 0 0.85
RT 247 0.85
0
0
79 R 79 1 1.000 1.000 79 0.00 1.00
* Denotes a Defacto Left Turn Lane Group
SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Page-6
=======================================================================
IDEAL ADJ.
SAT. NO. f f f f f f f f SAT.
FLOW LNS W HV G p BB A RT LT FLOW
____ ___ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ____
EB
L 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.244 435
TR 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.992 1.000 1.000 1.000 1768
WB
LTR 1800 2 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.996 1.000 1.000 0.980 3478
NB
LT 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.952 1697
R 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.992 1.000 0.826 1.000 1460
SB
R 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.992 1.000 0.826 1.000 1460
CAPACITY
======================================================================
ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
Page-7
ADJ.
ADJ. SAT.
FLOW
LANE GROUP
FLOW RATE
FLOW RATE
RATIO
GREEN RATIO
CAPACITY
v/c
(v)
_________
(s)
_________
(v/s)
(g/C)
(c)
RATIO
EB
_____
___________
__________
_____
L
192
435
0.441
0.717
312
0.615
TR
887
1768
0'502
0.717
1267
0.700 *
WB
LTR
1125
3478
0.324
0.717
2493
0.451
NB
LT
4
1697
0.002
0.183
311
0.011
R
2
1460
0.002
0.183
268
0.009
SB
R
79
1460
0.054
0.183
268
0.294 *
Cycle Length, C = 60.0
sec.
Sum (v/s) critical
= 0.556
Lost Time
Per Cycle,
L = 6.0 sec.
X critical =
0.617
LEVEL -OF -SERVICE
======================================================================
WORKSHEET
Page-8
DELAY
LANE
DELAY
LANE
LANE
DELAY LOS
v/c
g/C
CYCLE d
GROUP
d
PROG.
GRP.
GRP.
BY BY
RATIO
_____
RATIO
_____
LEN. 1
_____ _____
CAP.
_____
2
FACT.
DELAY
LOS
APP. APP.
EB
_____
_____
_____
____
_____ ____
L 0.615
0.717
60.0 3.3
312
2.6
1.00
5.8
B
5.1 B
TR 0.700
0.717
60.0 3.7
1267
1.2
1.00
4.9
A
WB
LTR 0.451 0.717 60.0 2.7 2493 0.1 1.60 2.8 A
NB
LT 0.011 0.183 60.0 15.2
R 0.009 0.183 60.0 15.2
SB
R 0.294 0.183 60.0 16.1
311 0.0 1.00 15.2 C
268 0.0 1.00 15.2 C
2.8 A
15.2 C
268 0.2 1.00 16.3 C 16.3 C
Intersection Delay = 4.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
**********************************************************************
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
======================================================================
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ......... WILLISTON RD.
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ....... MIDAS/WHITE
AREA TYPE ............................ OTHER
NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. R. DICKINSON
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ................. 9-16-87
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. 1988 P.M. DHV
OTHER INFORMATION:
W/O PROJECT
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
======================================================================
EB
_____
WB
NB
SB
LEFT
324
_____
85
_____
115
0
THRU
956
958
64
0
RIGHT
99
15
84
382
RTOR
0
0
0
180
(RTOR volume must be less than or equal to RIGHT turn volumes.)
INTERSECTION GEOMETRY
======================================================================
Page-2
NUMBER
OF LANES PER DIRECTION
INCLUDING
TURN BAYS:
EASTBOUND
= 2 WESTBOUND =
2
NORTHBOUND = 2
SOUTHBOUND = 1
EB WB
NB
SB
LANE
____
TYPE WIDTH TYPE
____ _____ ____
WIDTH
_____
TYPE WIDTH
TYPE WIDTH
I
LT 12.0 LT
12.0
____ _____
LT 12.0
____ ------
R 12.0
2
TR 12.0 TR
12.0
R 12.0
12.0
3
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
4
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
5
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
6
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
L -
EXCLUSIVE LEFT LANE
T - EXCLUSIVE
THROUGH LANE
LT -
LEFT/THROUGH LANE
TR -.THROUGH/RIGHT
LANE
LR -
LEFT/RIGHT ONLY LANE
R - EXCLUSIVE
RIGHT LANE
LTR -
LEFT/THROUGH/RIGHT LANE
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
======================================================================
GRADE
HEAVY VEH.
ADJACENT
PKG
BUSES
(%)
_____
(%)
__________
Y/N
___
(Nm)
(Nb)
PHF
EASTBOUND
0.00
2.00
N
____
0
____
2
0.92
WESTBOUND
0.00
2.00
N
0
2
0.91
NORTHBOUND
0.00
2.00
N
0
2
0.85
SOUTHBOUND
0.00
2.00
N
0
2
0.85
Nm = number
of parking
maneuvers/hr;
Nb
= number of
buses stopping/hr
CONFLICTING
PEDS
PEDESTRIAN
BUTTON
(peds/hour)
________________
(Y/N)
(min T)
ARRIVAL TYPE
EASTBOUND
50
_________________
N
11.5
____________
3
WESTBOUND
50
N
11.5
3
NORTHBOUND
50
N
14.5
3
SOUTHBOUND
50
N
14.5
3
min T = minimum green time for pedestrians
SIGNAL SETTINGS - DESIGN ANALYSIS
================================ Page-.-,
qFwr_^r-
-�..^ /uA/EU LOST TIME/CYCLE = 6.0 CYCLE LENGTH = 70.0
EAST/WEST PHASING
_______________________
PHASE-1 PHASE-2 pHASE---------------------------__-
EASTBOUND
-3 PHASE-4
"cr/
X
THRU
X
RIGHT ^
X
X
PEDS
X
X
X
WESTBOUND
LEFT
THRU
X
RIGHT
X
PEDS
X
X
NORTHBOUND RT
SOUTHBOUND RT
NORTH/SOUTH PHASING
----------
------- _-------
______
NORTHBOUND PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3
-3 PHASE-4 -----------------
LEFT
THRU '`
X
RIGHT
X
PEDS
X
SOUTHBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
X
PEDS
X
EASTBOUND RT
WESTBOUND RT
EFFECTIVE GREENS - DESIGN ANALYSIS Page-4
======================================================================
EFFECTIVE GREEN, g
__________________
EASTBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
45.00
Protected
5.00
THRU
53.00
RIGHT
Permitted
53.00
Protected
0.00
WESTBOUND
LEFT
Permitted 45.00
Protected 0.00
THRU 45.00
RIGHT
Permitted 45.00
Protected 0.00
NORTHBOUND
LEFT
Permitted 0.00
Protected 11.00
THRU 11.00
RIGHT
Permitted 11.00
Protected 0.00
SOUTHBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
0.00
Protected
0.00
THRU
0.00
RIGHT
Permitted
15.00
Protected
0.00
VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET
Page-5
MVT^ ADJ LANE LANE LANE ADJ
VOL pHF GRP^ NO. UTIL GROWTH GRp^
^ VOLVOL^ GRP^ N FACT^ ^ PROP PROP
____ ____ ____ _ VOL.. . FACT. VOL. LT RT
EB--- -- ----- ------ _--- ---- ----
LT
324
0.92
352
*L
TH
956
0.92
1039
TR
RT
99
0.92
108
WB
LT
85
0.91
93
*L
TH
958
0.91
1053
TR
RT
15
0.91
16
NB
LT 115 0.85
TH 64 0.85
RT 84 0.85
SB
LT 0 0.85
TH 0 0.85
RT 382 0.85
135
75 LT
99 R
352 1 1.000
1147 1 1.000
93 1 1.000
1069 1 1.000
211 1 1.000
99 1 1.000
1.000 352 1.00 0.00
1.000 1147 0.00 0.09
1.000 93 1.00 0.00
1.000 1069 0.00 0.02
1.000 211 0.64 0.00
1.000 99 0.00 1.00
0
0
237 R 237 1 1.000 1.000 237 0.00 1.00
* Denotes a Defacto Left Turn Lane Group
SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Page -
IDEAL
ADJ.
SAT. NO. f f f f f f f f SAT.
FLOW LNS W HV G p BB A RT LT FLO4
____ ___ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ____
EB
L 1800 1
TR 1800 1
WB
L 1800 1
TR 1800 1
NB
LT 1800 1
R 1800 1
1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.950 169�
1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.992 1.000 0.984 1.000 1735
1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.092 165
1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000.0.992 1.000 0.997 1.000 1763
1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.969 1727
1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.992 1.000 0.826 1.000 1460
Sr.-3
R 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.992 1.000 0.826 1.000 1460
CAPACITY
===================
ANALYSIS
WORKSHEET
=============================================Page-';
ADJ.
ADJ, SAT.
FLOW
======
FLOW RATE FLOW RATE
RATIO
GREEN RATIO LANE GROUP
_(«)
(s)
(v/s)
(g/C>
�APACITY
v/c
EB-
__
-----
-----------
(c)
----------
RATIO
Lperm.
225
-----
Lprot.
TR
128
1147
1693
1739
0.075
0^114
121
1.056 *
.
0^65p
0.�57
1317
^
0.871
WB
L
TR
1093
_'
1165
/��
0.567
0.643
106
0 883
0.606
0.643
1133
^
0^943 *
NB
LT
R
211
99
1727
1460
0.122
0.068
0 157
^ 271
0.776
.
0^157
230
^
0.431
SB
R
237
1460
0.163
0.214
313
Cycle Length,
C =
70.0
^
0.759 *
Lost Time
Per Cycle,
sec
L = 6.^0
Sum
(«/s)
critical = 0,844
sec
. X
critical
= 0.924
LEVEL -OF -SERVICE WORKSHEET Page-8
======================================================================
DELAY LANE DELAY LANE LANE DELAY LOS
v/c g/C CYCLE d GROUP d PROG. GRP. GRP. BY BY
RATIO RATIO LEN. 1 CAP. 2 FACT. DELAY LOS APP. APP.
_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____ ____
EB
L 1.056 0.714 70.0 8.8 121 83.6 1.00 92.5 F 28.9 D
TR 0.871 0.757 70.0 4.6 1317 4.7 1.00 9.3 B
WB
L
o.UUJ
0.643
70.0
7.8
106
35.9
1.00
43.7 E
21.6 C
TR
0.943
0.643
70.0
8.6
1133
11.1
1.00
19.7 C
NB
LT
0.776
0.157
70.0
21.5
271
8.9
1.00
30.5 D
27.5 D
R
0.431
0.157
70.0
20.3
230
0.8
1.00
21.1 C
SB
R
0.759
0.214
70.0
19.6
313
7.0
1.00
26.6 D
26.6 D
Intersection
Delay
= 25.9
(sec/veh)
Intersection
LOS =
D
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
****************************************************************Page-1
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION '
======================================================================
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ......... WILLISTON RD.
NAME
OF THE
NORTH/SOUTH STREET
.......
MIDAS/WHITE
AREA
TYPE..~.........
.......~........OTHER
NAME
OF THE
ANALYST.
.................R.
DICKINSON
DATE
OF THE
ANALYSIS
.................9-16-87
TIME
PERIOD
ANALYZED.
................1988
A.M. DHV
OTHER
INFORMATION:
W/ PROJECT
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
B WB
E- NB SB
LEFT
-----
177 6 3 -----
0
THRU
781 956
0 0
RIGHT
5 0
2 261
RTOR
0
0 0 180
(RTOR volume must be less than or equal to RIGHT turn volumes.)
INTERSECTION GEOMETRY Page-2
======================================================================
NUMBER OF LANES PER DIRECTION INCLUDING TURN BAYS:
EASTBOUND
= 2 WESTBOUND =
2
NORTHBOUND = 2
SOUTHBOUND = 1
EB WB
NB
SB
LANE
____
TYPE WIDTH TYPE
____ _____ ____
WIDTH
TYPE WIDTH
TYPE WIDTH
1
LT 12.0 LT
_____
12.0
____ _____
LT 12.0
R 12.0
2
TR 12.0 TR
12.0
R 12.0
12.0
3
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
4
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
5
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
6
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
L -
EXCLUSIVE LEFT LANE
T - EXCLUSIVE
THROUGH LANE
LT -
LEFT/THROUGH LANE
TR - THROUGH/RIGHT
LANE
LR -
LEFT/RIGHT ONLY LANE
R - EXCLUSIVE
RIGHT LANE
LTR -
LEFT/THROUGH/RIGHT LANE
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
======================================================================
GRADE HEAVY VEH.
ADJACENT
PKG
BUSES
(%) (%)
__________
Y/N
(Nm)
(Nb)
PHI
EASTBOUND
0.00 2.00
___
N
____
0
____
2
0.85
WESTBOUND
0.00 2.00
N
0
2
0.85
NORTHBOUND
0.00 2.00
N
0
2
0.85
SOUTHBOUND
0.00 2.00
N
0
2
0.85
Nm = number
of parking maneuvers/hr;
Nb
= number of
buses stopping/hr
CONFLICTING PEDS
PEDESTRIAN
BUTTON
(peds/hour)
________________
(Y/N)
(min T)
ARRIVAL TYPE
EASTBOUND
50
_________________
N
16.8
-------------
3
WESTBOUND
50
N
16.8
3
NORTHBOUND
50
N
19.8
3
SOUTHBOUND
50
N
19.8
3
min T = minimum
green time for
pedestrians
SIGNAL SETTINGS - DESIGN ANALYSIS Page-3
======================================================================
SEMI -ACTUATED LOST TIME/CYCLE = 6.0 CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0
EAST/WEST PHASING
______________________________________________________________________
PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4
EASTBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
WESTBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
NORTHBOUND RT
SOUTHBOUND RT
NORTH/SOUTH PHASING
___________________________________________________________________
PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4
NORTHBOUND
LEFT X
THRU X
RIGHT X
PEDS X
SOUTHBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT X
PEDS X
EASTBOUND RT
WESTBOUND RT
EFFECTIVE GREENS - DESIGN ANALYSIS Page-4
======================================================================
EFFECTIVE GREEN, g
-------------------
EASTBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
43.00
Protected
0.00
THRU
43.00
RIGHT
Permitted
43.00
Protected
0.00
WESTBOUND
Permitted 43.00
Protected 0.00
THRU 43.00
RIGHT
Permitted 43.00
Protected 0.00
NORTHBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
0.00
Protected
11.00
THRU
11.00
RIGHT
Permitted
11.00
Protected
0.00
SOUTHBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
0.00
Protected
0.00
THRU
0.00
RIGHT
Permitted
11.00
Protected
0.00
VOLUME
ADJUSTMENT
WORKSHEET
================================================================Page_t�
MVT.
ADJ.
LANE
LANE
GRP.
LANE
NO UTIL
ADJ.
VOL.
PHF
VOL.
GRP.
VOL.
LN^ FACT.
GROWTH
bRP^
PROP
PROP
.
FACT .
VOL.
LT
RT
EB-----
__
------
----
--__
_---
LT
..
177
'"�
0.85
0.85
208
919
*L
208
1 1.000
1.000
208
1 00
0,00
TR
925
1 1.000
1.000
925
0^00
0^00
WB
LT
6
0.85
7
TH
956
0.85
1125
LTR
1132
2 1RT
0
0.85
o.050
1.000
1188
0.01
0.00
NB
LT
3
0.85
4
TH
RT
0
2
0.85
0.85
0
2
LT
R
4
1 1.000
1.000
4
1^00
0^00
2
1 1^000
.
1.^000
Z
0.00
1.00
SB
LT 0 0.85
TH 0 0.85
RT 261 0.85
0
0
95 R 95 1 1.000 1.000 95 0.00 1.00
* Denotes a Defacto Left Turn Lane Group
SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORK3HEET PageQ
=======================================================================
IDEAL ADJ.
SAT. NO. f f f f f f f f SAT.
FLOW LNS W HV G p BB A RT LT FLOW
____ ___ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ____
EB
L 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.214 382
TR 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.992 1.000 1.000 1.000 1768
WB
LTR 1800
NB
LT 1800
R 1800
2 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.996 1.000 1.000 0.975 3460
1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.952 1697
1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.992 1.000 0.826 1.000 1460
SB
R 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 0.992 1.000 0.826 1.000 1460
CAPACITY
======================================================================
ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
Page-7
ADJ.
ADJ. SAT.
FLOW
LANE GROUP
FLOW RATE
FLOW RATE
RATIO
GREEN RATIO
CAPACITY
v/c
(v)
_________
(s)
_________
(v/s)
(g/C)
(c)
RATIO
EB
_____
___________
__________
_____
L
208
382
0.545
0.717
274
0.761 *
TR
925
1768
0.523
0.717
1267
0.730
WB
LTR
1188
3460
0.343
0.717
2479
0.479
NB
LT
4
1697
0.002
0.183
311
0.011
R
2
1460
0.002
0.183
268
0.009
SD
R
95
1460
0.065
0.183
268
0.355 *
Cycle Length, C = 60.0
sec.
Sum (v/s) critical
= 0.610
Lost Time
Per Cycle,
L = 6.0
sec.
X critical =
0.678
LEVEL -OF -SERVICE WORKSHEET Page-8
======================================================================
DELAY LANE DELAY LANE LANE DELAY LOS
v/c g/C CYCLE d GROUP d PROG. GRP. GRP. BY BY
RATIO RATIO LEN. 1 CAP. 2 FACT. DELAY LOS APP. APP.
_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ ____ _____ ____
EB
L 0.761 0.717 60.0 4.0 274 8.0 1.00 12.0 B 6.6 B
TR 0.730 0.717 60.0 3.8 1267 1.5 1.00 5'4 B
WB
LTR 0.479 0.717 60.0 2.8 2479 0.1 1.00 2.9 A
NB
LT 0.011 0.183 60.0 15.2
R 0.009 0.183 60.0 15.2
SB
R 0.355 0.183 60.0 16.3
311 0.0 1.00 15.2 C
268 0.0 1.00 15.2 C
2.9 A
15.2 C
268 0.4 1.00 16.6 C 16.6 C
Intersection Delay = 5.2 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B
1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
****************************************************************Page-1
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
======================================================================
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ......... WILLISTON RD.
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET ....... MIDAS/WHITE
AREA TYPE......... ...................OTHER
NAME OF THE ANALYST ^.^^^.............R. DICKINSON
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS ^^^^^^^^^^^^^....9-16-87
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED .................1988 P.M. DHV
OTHER INFORMATION:
W/ PROJECT
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
======================================================================
__EB_
__WB_
NB
SB
LEFT
329
86
--
_ ----
115
-----
0
THRU
968
974
64
0
RIGHT
99
15
84
388
RTOR
0
0
0
180
(RTOR volume must be less than or equal to RIGHT turn volumes.)
INTERSECTION GEOMETRY Page-2
======================================================================
NUMBER OF LANES PER DIRECTION INCLUDING TURN BAYS:
EASTBOUND = 2 WESTBOUND =
2
NORTHBOUND = 2
SOUTHBOUND = 1
EB WB
NB
SD
LANE
..... _..... _
TYPE WIDTH TYPE
____ ..... .... .... .... ..... ____
WIDTH
___
TYPE WIDTH
TYPE WIDTH
1
LT 12.0 LT
.....
12.0
.....
____ _..... .... ..... .....
LT 12.0
.....
R 12.0
2
TR 12.0 TR
12.0
R 12.0
12.0
3
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
4
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
5
12.0
12.O
12.0
12.0
6
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
L -
EXCLUSIVE LEFT LANE
T - EXCLUSIVE
THROUGH LANE
LT -
LEFT/THROUGH LANE
TR - THROUGH/RIGHT
LANE
LR -
LEFT/RIGHT ONLY LANE
R - EXCLUSIVE
RIGHT LANE
LTR -
LEFT/THROUGH/RIGHT LANE
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
======================================================================
GRADE HEAVY VEH.
ADJACENT
PKG
BUSES
(%) (%)
Y/N
(Nm)
(Nb)
PHF
EASTBOUND
__________
0.00 2.00
___
N
____
0
____
2
----
0.92
WESTBOUND
0.00 2.00
N
0
2
0.91
NORTHBOUND
0.00 2.00
N
0
2
0.85
SOUTHBOUND
0.00 2.00
N
0
2
0.85
Nm = number
of parking maneuvers/hr;
Nb
= number of
buses stopping/hr
CONFLICTING PEDS
PEDESTRIAN
BUTTON
(peds/hour)
________________
(Y/N)
(min T)
ARRIVAL TYPE
EASTBOUND
50
_________________
N
11.5
____________
3
WESTBOUND
50
N
11.5
3
NORTHBOUND
50
N
14.5
3
SOUTHBOUND
50
N
14.5
3
min T = minimum green time for pedestrians
'
SIGNAL SETTINGS - DESIGN ANALYSIS
Page_
SEMI -ACTUATED LOST TIME/CYCLE = 6.0 CYCLE LENGTH = 70.0
EAST/WEST PHASING
__________________________________________________________
EASTBOUND PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4 ----------'
— ---'~
LEFT
X
X
THRU
«
X
RIGHT
X
X
PEDS
X
X
WESTBOUND
LEFT
THRU
X
RIGHT
X
PEDS
X
X
NORTHBOUND RT
SOUTHBOUND RT
NORTH/SOUTH PHASING
_________________________________________________________
NORTupn//mn PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4 -------------
���� ���'`�
LEFT
THRU
X
RIGHT
X
PEDS
X
SOUTHBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
X
PEDS
X
EASTBOUND RT
WESTBOUND RT
EFFECTIVE GREENS - DESIGN ANALYSIS Page-4
======================================================================
EFFECTIVE GREEN, g
__________________
EASTBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
45.00
Protected
5.00
THRU
53.00
RIGHT
Permitted
53.00
Protected
0.00
WESTBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
45.00
Protected
0.00
THRU
45.00
RIGHT
Permitted
45.00
Protected
0.00
NORTHBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
0.00
Protected
11.00
THRU
11.00
RIGHT
Permitted
11.00
Protected
0.00
SOUTHBOUND
LEFT
Permitted
0.00
Protected
0.00
THRU
0.00
RIGHT
Permitted
15.00
Protected
0.00
VOLUME
======================================================================
ADJUSTMENT
WORKSHEET
Page-5
LANE
LANE
ADJ.
MVT.
ADJ.
LANE
GRP. NO.
UTIL.
GROWTH
GRP.
PROP
PROP
VOL.
____
PHF
____
VOL.
____
GRP.
____
VOL. LN
____
FACT.
FACT.
VOL.
LT
RT
EB
__
_____
______
____
____
____
LT
329
0.92
358
*L
358 1
1.000
1.000
358
1.00
0.00
TH
968
0.92
1052
TR
1160 1
1.000
1.000
1160
0.00
0.09
RT
99
0.92
108
WB
LT
86
0.91
95
*L
95 1
1.000
1.000
95
1.00
0.00
TH
974
0.91
1070
TR
1087 1
1.000
1.000
1087
0.00
0.02
RT
15
0.91
16
NB
LT
115
0.85
135
TH
64
0.85
75
LT
211 1
1.000
1.000
211
0.64
0.00
RT
84
0.85
99
R
99 1
1.000
1.000
99
0.00
1.00
SB
LT 0 0.85 0
TH 0 0.85 0
RT 388 0.85 244 R 244 1 1.000 1.000 244 0.00 1.00
* Denotes a Defacto Left Turn Lane Group
.
SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT
=======================================================================
WORKSHEET
Page-6
IDEAL
ADJ.
SAT.
NO. f
f
f
f
f
f
f
f
SAT.
FLOW
LNS W
HV
G
p
BB
A
RT
LT
FLOW
EB
___
L
1800
1 1.000
0.990
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.950
1693
TR
1800
1 1.000
0.990
1.000
1.000
0.992
1.000
0.984
1.000
1739
WB
L
1800
1 1.000
0.990
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.089
158
TR
1800
1 1.000
0.990
1.000
1.000
0.992
1.000
0.997
1.000
1763
NB
LT
1800
1 1.000
0.990
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
0.969
1727
R
1800
1 1.000
0.990
1.000
1.000
0.992
1.000
0.826
1.000
1460
SB
R
1800
1 1.000
0.990
1.000
1.000
0.992
1.000
0.826
1.000
'
1460
CAPACITY
======================================================================
ANALYSIS WORKSHEET
Page-7
ADJ.
ADJ. SAT.
FLOW
LANE GROUP
FLOW RATE
FLOW RATE
RATIO
GREEN RATIO
CAPACITY
v/c
(v)
(s)
(v/s)
(g/C)
(c)
RATIO
EB
Lperm.
223
Lprot.
134
1693
0.079
0.114
121
1.110 *
TR
1160
1739
0.667
0.757
1317
0.881
WB
L
95
158
0.597
0.643
102
0.928
TR
1087
1763
0.616
0.643
1133
0.959 *
NB
LT
211
1727
0.122
0.157
271
0.776
R
99
1460
0.068
0.157
230
0.431
SD
R
244
1460
0.167
0.214
313
0.781 *
Cycle Length, C = 70.0
sec.
Sum (v/s) critical = 0.863
Lost Time
Per Cycle,
L = 6.0
sec.
X critical =
0.944
LEVEL -OF -SERVICE WORKSHEET
======================================================================
Page-8
DELAY
LANE
DELAY
LANE
LANE
DELAY
LOS
v/c
g/C
CYCLE
d
GROUP
d
PROG.
GRP.
GRP.
BY
BY
RATIO
_____
RATIO
_____
LEN.
_____
1
_____
CAP.
_____
2
_____
FACT.
_____
DELAY
_____
LOS
____
APP.
_____
APP.
____
EB
L
1.110
0.714
70.0
10.5
121
108.3
1.00
118.8
F
35.5
D
TR
0.881
0.757
70.0
4.7
1317
5.2
1.00
9.9
B
WB
L
0.928
0.643
70.0
8.4
102
47.2
1.00
55.6
E
24.6
C
TR
0.959
0.643
70.0
8.8
1133
13.1
1.00
21.9
C
NB
LT
0.776
0.157
70.0
21.5
271
8.9
1.00
30.5
D
27.5
D
R
0.431
0.157
70.0
20.3
230
0.8
1.00
21.1
C
SB
R
0.781
0.214
70.0
19.7
313
8.2
1.00
27.9
D
27.9
D
Intersection
Delay
= 30.2 (sec/veh)
Intersection LOS = D