HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Affordable Housing Committee - 05/23/2023South Burlington Affordable Housing Committee
Room #301 at 180 Market St
South Burlington, VT 05403
AGENDA
Participation Options In Person: Room #301 – 3rd Floor – 180 Market St
Assistive Listening Service Devices Available upon request Electronically: https://meet.goto.com/SouthBurlingtonVT/affordable-housing-committee05-23-2023 Dial in using your phone: +1 (786) 535-3211 Access Code: 561-073-877
Tuesday May 23, 2023 5:00 PM
1.Call to order, approve agenda, announcements, public comment
2.*** Approve minutes from April 19, 2023 Affordable Housing Meeting.
3.City Manager Update
4.*** Finalize feedback to the Planning Commission on the Comprehensive PlanHousing section
5.*** Discuss the FY23 Policy Priorities & Strategies Report and the FY24 PolicyPriorities & Strategies Recommendations
6. Adjourn
April 19, 2023, SoBu Affordable Housing Committee Minutes – DRAFT Page 1
Prepared on May 17, 2023 Next meeting: Tuesday, May 23, 2023, 5:00 p.m., online and at City Hall
AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMITTEE April 19, 2023, 6:00 p.m., meeting held online and at City Hall Members attending: Janet Bellavance, Vince Bolduc, Sandy Dooley, Tom Getz, Emily Holt-Gosselin, Ariel Jensen-Vargas, Darrilyn Peters, John Simson, and Chris Trombly; also present: Jessie Baker, City Manager, City Councilor Meaghan Emery (CC liaison to AHC); and (public) Amy Allen, South Burlington resident.
AGENDA 1. Call to order, approve agenda, announcements, public comment 2. Approve minutes from March 15, 2023, and March 22, 2023, meetings 3. Receive update on affordable housing at the Long Property – Janet (Deleted)
4. City Manager Update 5. Discussion on Fair Housing Month 6. Discuss timeline for providing feedback to the Planning Commission regarding the Comprehensive Plan 7. Receive update on rental registry ordinance – Councilor Emery, Jessie 7a. Discuss new business for future meetings
8. Adjourn 1. Call to order, approve agenda, announcements, public comment Call to order: Chris called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. Approve agenda: Sandy moved that the agenda be approved with the deletion, at Janet’s request, of item 2 “Receive update on affordable housing at the Long Property.” Darrilyn seconded motion and proposed an
addition to today’s agenda of “Discuss new business for future meetings” immediately before “Adjourn.” Sandy accepted Darrilyn’s proposed change as a friendly amendment to her motion. Darrilyn explained that her proposal is to have this be an item on all AHC meeting agendas. Members indicated support for this proposal. .
Motion to approve meeting agenda, as modified, approved: 9-0-0. Announcements: Members encouraged to check out Fair Housing Month display on Library’s second floor (prepared by Janet). Chris shared that Leslie Black-Plumeau resigned from the committee. Chris and John will
prepare a resolution honoring Leslie’s longstanding service and submit it to Jessie for action by City Council. Meaghan shared that she met with Paul Conner about addressing SEQ policy that, for small lots, limits density to 1.8 units per acre. He indicated the Planning Commission will get to it. Public Comments: Amy Allen indicated that she moved to SoBu recently and is attending the meeting to find out what’s happening in the City. 2. Approve minutes from March 15, 2023, and March 22, 2023, meetings: Vince moved and Ariel seconded motion to approve the minutes as drafted. Approved: 9-0-0.
3. Item removed from agenda. 4. City Manager Update: Jessie is hoping to schedule Andrew Hayes of Eastern Real Estate (owner of U-Mall) to meet with committee in June. Helen Riehle and Paul Conner will testify in House committee re S.100 on April 20. City Council (CC) will discuss need for additional water tower at next meeting. CC will need to make 37
appointments to City committees; they have adopted a different process for doing interviews, using two subcommittees.
5. Discussion on Fair Housing Month (FHM): Vince reported on book discussion group focused on Fixer-Upper, which is scheduled for May 3 in the Library. BTV’s CEDO office has donated 12 copies of the book to the Library for folks to read for the discussion or later. Sandy reported that, to date, individuals had picked up 22 of the 40
packets available for participation in the Project Home Art Project. Info about FHM events and activities has appeared in The Other Paper, the Library’s webpage, SoBu Front Porch Forum neighborhoods, the South Burlington Community Watch FB page, and SoBu’s City News.
April 19, 2023, SoBu Affordable Housing Committee Minutes – DRAFT Page 2
6. Discuss timeline for providing feedback to the Planning Commission regarding the Comprehensive Plan: Members reviewed timeline Kelsey Peterson sent Chris. She needs AHC’s input regarding draft Housing chapter by May 31. Jessie indicated the chapter length is likely to be four to seven pages. First draft of chapter will go to
Planning Commission (PC) on April 20 to be commented on at April 25 PC meeting after which Kelsey will prepare second draft. This is draft that AHC should provide feedback on. To allow ample time for preparation of second draft and the committee’s review of it, members decided to change date (and time) of May AHC meeting. The new date/time is Tuesday, May 23, 5 – 7 p.m. Members are encouraged to share comments on second draft to Jessie prior to this meeting.
7. Receive update on rental registry ordinance: Project team presented first draft of rental registry ordinance, including inspection cycle, to the CC on April 3. Ordinance includes regulations relating to short-term rentals (less than 30 days). No need for IT addition/upgrade to implement a rental registry. Questions: how is affordable housing treated? How is owner-occupied applied to “snowbirds”—i.e. people who leave in the winter but are SoBu residents because they are here at least 183 days of calendar year? Answer: if they meet residency requirement, then house is considered owner-occupied. Are all units inspected? Vin recommended inspecting a
sample of the units. How will ordinance affect HomeShare Vermont? How is tenant perspective incorporated? Ariel urged that team be mindful of need to design program to prevent unintended consequences; e.g. displacement (evacuation) of undocumented residents who have no alternative housing. Jessie indicated it would be good for project team to meet with Tom (Getz). Team will present updated draft to CC. Goal is to have registry and regulations effective on 1/1/2024.
7a. Discuss new business for future meetings: May – Comprehensive Plan Housing chapter review and feedback; June – meeting with U-Mall representative and FY24 Policies & Strategies.
Additional Info from Jessie re Deputy City Manager and related appointments: Steve Locke has been appointed Deputy City Manager and will continue as City’s Fire Chief. Chris Corbin has been appointed Deputy Fire Chief.
8. Adjourn: (7:50 p.m.) Ariel moved and Tom seconded motion to adjourn the meeting. Approved: 9-0-0.
HOUSING
Providing and encouraging housing retenƟon and development is a fundamental element of this plan.
Safe and affordable housing well‐matched to circumstances supports a high quality of life, retains
exisƟng businesses, supports economic prosperity, and aƩracts future residents. Diverse housing opƟons
at a range of price points grows the local community and economy. Housing opƟons for a range of
lifestyles and life stages can allow our residents to remain in South Burlington as they move through live,
can provide housing for our children to remain in South Burlington, and can aƩract 20‐somethings,
young families, mulƟ‐generaƟonal families, and seniors, all of which add to the vibrancy of our
community.
MeeƟng housing needs relies on a combinaƟon of affordability and availability, which go hand in hand.
We recognize the need for an increased supply of housing affordable to middle‐ and lower‐income
households; the challenge of availability of quality housing at lower price points been an issue in central
ChiƩenden County for many years and has recently intensified concurrent with the COVID‐19 pandemic.
Increasing supply of housing across the board can have the effect of tamping down excessive growth in
housing prices that outstrip growth in earnings regionally. Providing both permanently affordable
housing (through inclusionary zoning and affordability covenants) and a greater total variety of market
rate housing opƟons can make housing more affordable for many members of our community. We must
also address the needs of our most vulnerable homeless residents by improving access to services and
housing opƟons.
Overall, housing supply and cost are criƟcal to maintaining a healthy, varied, and supporƟve community,
to growing our local businesses and economy, and to meeƟng our climate‐change miƟgaƟon goals by
reducing commuƟng distances and building a walkable/bikeable community. We acknowledge that
increasing housing while avoiding construcƟon in greenfield areas while require increasing allowed
heights, allowed densiƟes, and other dimensional standards.
OBJECTIVES
Increase vacancy rate to 5% as a proxy for a healthy and well‐supplied housing market
Decrease prevalence of homelessness and residents with insufficient housing
STRATEGIES
Possibility of changing the height limitaƟons in appropriate areas
Explore opƟons in other communiƟes, now or historically, for creaƟve soluƟons
Determine appropriate funding mechanism for long‐term funding of the Affordable Housing
Trust Fund
INVENTORY, ANALYSIS, & CHALLENGES
ExisƟng Housing Stock. Approximately 48% of housing units are single‐family houses, 6% are duplexes
(either side‐by‐side or stacked), and 46% are mulƟ‐family (three or more units in the building). This
represents a dramaƟc shiŌ over the past two decades. In the year 2000, over two‐thirds of all dwellings
in the city were single family homes and less than 30% were mulƟ‐family. Within the next handful of
years, based on known development, the majority of all housing in the City will be mulƟ‐family.
South Burlington experienced its first wave of residenƟal development aŌer WWII with construcƟon of
significant numbers of single‐family homes and duplexes. Approximately 16% of exisƟng housing units
were built prior to 1960. These include homes in neighborhoods like Chamberlin, Mayfair Park, and the
Orchards. Homes from that era have evident challenges with insulaƟon, energy efficiency, and building
materials. The next wave of housing included a mix of single/two‐family homes and mid‐scale mulƟ‐
family housing near Dorset Street, Kennedy Drive, and Shelburne Road. These are also will need
reinvestment. Approximately 35% of housing units in South Burlington were constructed prior to 1980,
and risk having lead paint.
Over the last forty years, the City has averaged adding approximately 145 dwelling units per year (with
cyclical fluctuaƟons). The type of housing added over the past 25 years has been weighted toward mulƟ‐
family structures (both apartment rental and condominium ownership). Single‐family homes have
trended toward being larger and more expensive than the stock of exisƟng single‐family homes. Vacancy
rates for exisƟng housing have remained stubbornly low for both owned homes and rental homes,
contribuƟng to ongoing price increases in this market.
In recogniƟon of the significant housing need, the City has been a parƟcipant in the region’s Building
Homes Together campaign since its incepƟon in 2018. Significant conƟnued investment in addiƟonal
housing is necessary to address residenƟal costs, demand in this core employment area for the state,
and equity in access to safe and affordable housing in the region.
Housing Loss. ContribuƟng to the Ɵght housing market, approximately two‐hundred homes were bought
out and removed as part of a noise miƟgaƟon program adjacent to the Burlington InternaƟonal Airport
between the late 1990s to the mid 2010s. The City advocated diligently for the Airport and FAA to
terminate this program and replace it with a sound insulaƟon program for qualifying homes. This
program, piloted in 2022 and underway in 2023, is an important reinvestment in the neighborhood and
is directly consistent with the goals of this Plan. The land where the homes were removed is not at this
Ɵme eligible for new housing under FAA restricƟons; instead, the City and Airport are collaboraƟng to
uƟlize this area to enhance quality of life for the neighborhood (further discussed in the Land Use
Chapter of this Plan). To a lesser extent, housing has been lost elsewhere in the City. In 2016, the City
adopted its first‐ever housing preservaƟon requirements, requiring replacement of any home that is
removed in most parts of the city. This program serves the dual purpose of maintaining the number of
homes in the City and encouraging retenƟon of older (oŌen more affordable) homes.
Rental Market. Currently, approximately 60% of housing units are owner‐occupied and 40% are renter‐
occupied. XX% of single‐family homes, XX% of duplexes, and XX% of mulƟ‐family homes are owner‐
occupied, with the remainder being rentals. As more housing stock ages, total populaƟon increases, and
vacancy rates remain historically low, we need to develop a stronger toolbox to address health and
safety, and to communicate with rental property owners. The City is exploring establishment of a rental
registry and inspecƟon program.
Changing Demographics. Future housing development needs to take into account the City’s changing
populaƟon, as well as idenƟfying how the City can affect those trends. South Burlington has an
increasing populaƟon of older residents, although a lower percentage of South Burlington residents is
over 65 (16%) than in Vermont as a whole (20%). Some older residents want to move from high‐
maintenance single‐family homes into managed or supporƟve communiƟes, including condominiums,
55+ communiƟes, and assisted living faciliƟes, but may be unable if units/spots are not available. This
locks up housing stock with two, three, or more bedrooms with one or two residents and prevents
turnover to families who desire addiƟonal space.
South Burlington housing stock is currently approximately 49% units with three or more bedrooms and
51% with two or less. This both reflects current populaƟon with more one‐ and two‐person households
but also restricts the ability for residents to remain in South Burlington as they change life stage or
lifestyle. It reflects what has been built and not necessarily what is desired.
Short‐term rentals and second home ownership. A recent trend has been growth in the short‐term rental
industry. In 2023, approximately 75 homes in South Burlington were listed for short‐term rental. Of
these, approximately 60 were “enƟre house” rentals, and of those, a substanƟal number were available
on a full‐Ɵme basis. These full‐Ɵme, enƟre‐house rentals are contribute to the City’s housing shortage, as
they are unavailable as primary residences. Some may also be second homes, used by out‐of‐area
residents for less than six months per year, which also (whether rented the rest of the year or not) takes
housing units from the stock of available primary residences. The City is considering the adopƟon of a
ordinance to restrict the use of enƟre homes for full‐Ɵme, short‐term rentals.
Affordability. ConstrucƟon of new housing in ChiƩenden County as a whole has been outpaced by
growth in demand for housing units. Over Ɵme, this has created a significant deficit in the number of
available homes for a healthy and affordable housing market. This has led to an undersupply of both
definiƟonally “Affordable” housing and housing that is affordable to people at moderate income levels.
We define capital “A” “Affordable” as cosƟng, per month, 30% or less of the income of a household
making 80% of Area Median Income (AMI). The City has taken steps to require Affordable homes to be
built through required inclusionary zoning.
AddiƟonal steps and different strategies in incenƟvizaƟon and regulaƟon can result in more homes that
are affordable (meaning cosƟng 30% or less of household income) for people at a wider range of
incomes, including at 100% of AMI and 120% of AMI. In FY 2021, the AMI for a household of four in the
Burlington‐South Burlington area was $95,900, making a home affordable to a household at 100% AMI if
it costs approximately $2,400 per month, including mortgage or rent, property taxes and/or HOA fees,
and required uƟliƟes (heat, electric, water, and sewer). For rentals, according to the 2021 American
Community Survey, approximately 48% of renters in South Burlington are paying 30% or more of their
household income on gross rent. For 120% of AMI ($115,080 for a family of four), an affordable monthly
housing cost would be $2,875 per month. RelaƟvely high consumer mortgage interest rates
(approximately 6% in 2023, on average, compared with approximately 3‐4% in 2020/21) also reduces
buyer purchasing power by increasing monthly payments. Currently, we lack significant inventory of
homes in those cost ranges for a variety of reasons including both undersupply and high demand.
The shorƞall in affordable housing for low‐income and middle‐income households is regional. The City
strives to be a place in which its workforce can afford to live. According to the 2020 US Census, South
Burlington is a regional job center with nearly 18,000 jobs. This significantly exceeds the approximately
10,000 workers living in South Burlington (according to the 2020 US Census). Central ChiƩenden County
funcƟons as an economic system, with residents and workers being broadly exchanged with our near
neighbors in Burlington, Williston, Winooski, Essex, Colchester, and Shelburne. We must address
provision of a range of housing opƟons within our community, but also acknowledge the need to address
this issue regionally, as a cooperaƟve and collaboraƟve member of the ChiƩenden County community.
Lacking housing restricts economic growth and negaƟvely impacts our ability as a community to meet
our climate‐change‐miƟgaƟon goals. If workers cannot afford to live here or have to commute long
distances, they may be less likely to accept a job in South Burlington, limiƟng our businesses’ access to
workers. If workers do accept jobs but have to commute long distances, this increases dependence on
single‐passenger vehicles, increases vehicle miles traveled, and increases vehicle traffic, all of which is
counter to our climate‐change‐miƟgaƟon goals.
The City has taken significant first steps to improve access to, and distribuƟon of, affordable housing. In
2003, the City adopted a system of bonuses and incenƟves for development of affordable housing
through the Land Development RegulaƟons. This was replaced progressively during the 2010s with an
inclusionary zoning / supplemental bonus system. ComplemenƟng these regulatory tools, the City has
made substanƟal efforts to partner with private sector and non‐profit housing developers to fund
construcƟon and conversion of exisƟng buildings to permanently affordable housing, through State
programs, Federal grant programs, and the City’s affordable housing trust fund. AddiƟonal work on each
of these fronts is needed to meet our known needs.
Affordable Housing Trust Fund. The South Burlington Housing Trust Fund was established by the City
Council on November 17, 2014. Its purpose is to fund strategic parƟcipaƟon in development that will
increase the City’s stock of Affordable housing for households below 80 % of AMI. The Trust Fund may,
among other opƟons, (1) parƟcipate in new affordable housing development through funding supporƟng
project financing of a project undertaken by a private developer, (2) financially support projects
preserving exisƟng affordable housing, (3) provide pre‐development funding to housing agencies or
developers for a project feasibility assessment, and (4) support the purchase of land for affordable
housing development. It is currently funded as a line item in the Annual Budget.
Ten‐Year Affordable Housing Targets. Currently, there are *** permanently affordable housing units in
South Burlington, including inclusionary zoning housing and other affordable housing schemes. This plan
includes targets of construcƟon, by 2032, of **** new affordable housing units – *** housing units
affordable to households earning up to 80% of the AMI and *** housing units affordable to households
earning between 80% and 120% of the AMI.
SupporƟng Private Development. The role the City plays in housing must complement and support the
role of the private development sector. The City has no direct control over such cost factors as increases
in labor, materials, down payments, mortgage rates, and availability of credit. However, the City can
influence housing development costs by changing allowed units per acre density, promoƟng mixed‐use
development, streamlining permiƫng and approval processes, and parƟcipaƟon in State iniƟaƟves such
as Neighborhood Development Areas. It can potenƟally also support different levels of affordable
housing by charging different impact fees.
Building Codes. ConstrucƟon of rental and mulƟ‐unit housing in the City is regulated by State of Vermont
Fire Codes through the South Burlington Fire Marshal’s Office. With increasing density of development in
some areas of the city, the City should consider applicaƟon of residenƟal building codes to the
construcƟon of single‐family homes as well. The existence of such codes can decrease insurance
premiums, increase fire safety and standardizaƟon of necessary firefighƟng equipment, and provide
more assurance to purchasers.
Smart Growth, Infill Housing, and Conversions. A relaƟvely small amount of undeveloped land remains
available in the City. South Burlington will need to look increasingly to opportuniƟes for higher‐density,
mixed‐use development in targeted growth areas like City Center and other infrastructure‐served
porƟons of the community. We also need to increase density and enable infill development within
exisƟng neighborhoods to meet demand for addiƟonal housing units without construcƟng in greenfield
areas. The City must be a partner in the ChiƩenden County Regional Planning Commission’s ECOS Plan
goal of having 80% of new development take place in areas planned for growth, which amounts to 15%
of the (ChiƩenden County’s) Land area.
Historically, new housing built in South Burlington has been on undeveloped land. This is changing due to
a combinaƟon of market forces and City policy. Infill development between buildings, both residenƟal
and mixed‐use, has been occurring along the City’s major transportaƟon corridors. Recently, the City has
seen several conversions of former hotels to permanent housing. Where older commercial buildings are
reaching a stage of needed reinvestment, we have been seeing several re‐development projects, oŌen at
greater densiƟes and more aligned with the City’s land use goals.
The City has mulƟple opportuniƟes to further support these trends supporƟng this Plan’s goals for
thriving mixed‐use neighborhoods, affordability, and climate acƟon. This Plan supports a combinaƟon of
larger‐scale redevelopment and infill along transit‐served corridors, and smaller‐scale strategic
reinvestment and thoughƞul infill within exisƟng neighborhoods. Lot sizes in the City’s post‐war
neighborhoods are typically larger than similar neighborhoods regionally and naƟonally, which presents
opportuniƟes for small‐scale contribuƟons to neighborhoods.
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
◆ The Path to Affordability: South Burlington 2013 Affordable Housing Report
Darrilyn Peters
NOTES on AHC SecƟon
Comp Plan, draŌ 4‐28‐23
SUGGESTED ADDITIONS TO TEXT:
HOMELESSNESS
(Suggest you move last sentence of second paragraph to begin a new paragraph just about
homelessness.)
Housing scarcity, resulƟng from rising rent prices and plummeƟng vacancy rates, is the
underlying cause of homelessness. While a popular assumpƟon is that homelessness results
from mental illness, there is considerable research indicaƟng that mental illness is as likely to
be the product of homelessness. Among the 50 states, Vermont ranks second in the rate of
homelessness per 10,000 populaƟon (HUD). The homeless populaƟon in South Burlington is
not known, but the Chief of Police reported to the City Council last year that there are 12
encampments in the city, all of which are on private property. Last year the City Council
allocated over $1 million ARPA funds for affordable housing projects, two of which include
housing and services for the homeless populaƟon.
PAGE 2
(Paragraph 3 “ongoing price increases”) Could you add a sentence about prices?
Median home price in Vermont increased 50% in the past five years, per realtor.com, while the
naƟonal increase was 30%. Kelsey: do you have a figure for South Burlington or ChiƩenden
County?
(Paragraph 4 there is a sentence that menƟons that the City has been a parƟcipant in Building
Homes Together since its incepƟon in 2018. The current campaign calls for building 5,000
homes in ChiƩenden County by 2025, of which 1,250 should be affordable.
PAGE 4
Last sentence of paragraph 4 states that the SB Housing Trust Fund is currently funded by a line
item in the Annual Budget. I think it would be helpful to be specific: by a $50,000 line item in
the Annual Budget.
ALSO
Might want to menƟon the LDR change to allow any homeowner to build an ADU without
obtaining permit from the City. Could aid in paying rent/mortgage; might house a caretaker for
an elderly resident etc.
STRATEGIES
Increase the affordable inclusionary zoning rate from 10% to 20% for ownership units and from
15% to 25% for rental units, while further reducing impact fees for these units.
IdenƟfy areas of the City that could accommodate mixed‐use redevelopment or infill and
assess whether rezoning would be required.
Encourage the management of the U Mall to hold a listening session with residents to hear
their hopes and visions for the mall.
In order to provide important and Ɵmely data to all SB residents, the City should maintain a
public ledger of all housing developments, by stage of development (e.g. first sketch, final
sketch, etc to occupancy permit) updated quarterly and maintained on the Planning & Zoning
website.
Request the AHC and the Library to partner with nonprofit and for‐profit businesses to offer a
program “IntroducƟon to Building an ADU” and ascertain interest in offering hands‐on
workshop(s).
1
Jessie Baker
From:Emily Holt-Gosselin <eholtgosselin@gmail.com>
Sent:Monday, May 15, 2023 10:25 AM
To:Jessie Baker
Subject:'EXTERNAL'Re: FW: City Plan: Housing Section for AHC
This message has originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening
attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email.
Hi Jessie!
The initial draft looks great.
Something that stuck out to me was the lack of addressing housing for homeless/insufficient housing individuals. There
was some promising info in terms of expanding low/middle income housing options yet not much in terms of
developing/offering short or long term housing options or services for folks who are struggling to find housing. Perhaps
the housing portion of this was meant to be included within the 'low income' reference. Additionally, I imagine it's a bit
beyond our scope within the AHC to propose prospective services, yet the desire to increase access to services is
mentioned within the intro of this document.
I'm also curious if we should include more specific recommendations for new construction or renovation in terms of
locations/housing types. At the moment I am not familiar enough with the restrictions or availability of certain
geographical locations in SB to offer recs myself, yet if that information is helpful, I could see it offering even more
clarity and guidance.
Lastly, (again maybe a little outside of my own knowledge about the scope of this draft), I am curious if there are
possible stipends, low interest rate loans, tax deductions etc. that could be offered to low/middle income folks who
qualify who are looking to purchase or rent.
My main sense of this draft is that there are some really helpful general recommendations and facts/figures, yet I find
myself longing for more clarity and specifics. I trust that my fellow AHC peers will have much more tangible recs for this
doc but wanted to share my initial thoughts!
I am also most likely working the night of our meeting this month (I am on‐call for work but will certainly attend if I am
called off). I am eager to read/hear the other suggestions brought forth by the committee.
Thank you for coordinating all our responses!
Warmly,
Emily
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 4:45 PM Jessie Baker <jbaker@southburlingtonvt.gov> wrote:
Hello Affordable Housing Committee,
2
Attached please find the draft of the Housing chapter of the Comp Plan that Kelsey asked me to share with you – along
with her instructions below.
As a reminder, we will NOT meet on May 17th but instead on May 23rd at 5:00 PM. Please share your feedback directly
with me by May 18th and I will attach all comments I received to the May 23rd agenda. Please do not reply all.
Thank you for your review!
Jessie
From: Kelsey Peterson <kpeterson@southburlingtonvt.gov>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 1:02 PM
To: Jessie Baker <jbaker@southburlingtonvt.gov>
Subject: City Plan: Housing Section for AHC
Hi Jessie,
Please find attached the draft Housing section for the 2024 City Plan. This has been reviewed by the Planning
Commission and updated to reflect their feedback. It draws on the previous feedback provided by the AHC, the public
comment provided at the Community Conversation on Housing & Shelter, and statements made in the 2016
Comprehensive Plan.
Can you send this to the Affordable Housing Committee? I had an email conversation with Chris Trombly about wanting
this draft as soon as I could get it to them, so they can work on feedback to be finalized at their May 17 meeting. I need
any feedback they have by May 31, so from my perspective they can continue to work on it post‐May 17 if they
wanted.
I’m primarily looking for feedback on the policy statements made, including if there are policy statements that are
missing. I’d also love the AHC’s ideas for measurable objectives. These are the long‐range goals that can be
accomplished by actions, but are the measurable goals that would tell us that we’re making headway. There are a few
included in the draft – there are incomplete and serve partially as a few ideas and partially as placeholders. Unless
there are specific terms that I’ve misused or words that change the meaning in a way that makes the statement
inaccurate, I’m not asking for line‐by‐line edits by the AHC. Hopefully that will also streamline discussion of the draft.
Let me know if you, or the AHC, has any questions.
3
Thanks!
Kelsey
Kelsey Peterson (she/her)
City Planner
City of South Burlington
180 Market Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
(802) 846‐4106
www.sbvt.gov
Notice ‐ Under Vermont’s Public Records Act, all e‐mail, e‐mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in
matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as
public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message
in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation.
1
Jessie Baker
From:Janet Bellavance <janetbellava@gmail.com>
Sent:Friday, May 12, 2023 12:18 PM
To:Jessie Baker
Subject:'EXTERNAL'AHC Comp plan document feedback
This message has originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening
attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email.
Hi Jessie,
I have only a few minor word changes:
Paragraph 1:
"supports economic development" change to "supports economic prosperity"
"Diverse housing options at a range of price point grows the local community" change to "Diverse housing options at a
range of price points supports the local community"
Paragraph 3:
..."to growing our local businesses and economy". change to
..."to sustaining our local businesses and economy"
Under Affordability, the 4th paragraph:
Lacking housing restricts economic growth"... change to
"Lacking housing restricts economic prosperity"...
Last Paragraph of document:
"The City has multiple opportunities to further support these trends"... change to
"The City has multiple opportunities to further support these infill and redevelopment trends..."
I am sure there will be more substantial edits/conversation at our meeting. This document is a well done draft.
Janet
1
Jessie Baker
From:John Simson <simsonjohn0840@gmail.com>
Sent:Thursday, May 18, 2023 2:25 PM
To:Jessie Baker
Subject:'EXTERNAL'Housing section of Comprehensive Plan
This message has originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening
attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email.
Hi Jesse,
The draft as written is excellent and can stand on its own. Any recommendations for strategies or immediate action I
can suggest would fit within this framework.
John Simson
Recommended FY23 Priorities for Committee Proposed FY23 Strategies/Projects Committee ActionAHCMission‐related advisory role related to development of affordable housing.City‐wide inclusionary zoning adopted, which has been a committee goal since its inception. Provided recommendations to P;lannig Commission and City Council re LDR changes under Interim Zoming. Provided input to DRB regarding Summit Properties development of affordable housing as part of O'Brien Frams development. (ongoing) Make recommendations to Planning Commission and/or City Council in support of Comprehensive Plan content, Land Development Regulations, and other City regulations that address the housing crisis and promote preservation and increased availability of safe, secure, and affordable housing. Participate in update of City’s Comprehensive Plan, including advocacy for a Housing Needs Assessment. Jointly with Economic Development Committee, review proposed Short‐term Rental ordinance and make recommendation to the City Council. Advocate for change to SEQ LDR that limits density to 1.8 units per acre on lots smaller than 4 acres. Identify renter‐related and home‐buyer protection strategies tp pursue in FY24. AHC Explore funding mechanisms to increase funding to Affordable Housing Trust Fund and make recommendations to Council. Housing Trust Fund level funded in the FY23 budget. Focused on availability of ARPA funding to support development of affordabley housing. Otherwise not started.Explore potential methods by which the City can increase resources—financial and/or staffing and/or data—directed to housing, especially affordable housing. Propose using ARPA funds for a Housing Needs Assessment. Advocate for additional City staff dedicated to community, housing, and economic development. Propose using ARPA funds for a Housing Needs Assessment. Advocate for additional City staff dedicated to community, housing, and economic development. AHC Work with staff to review options for buying privately owned or developing existing city‐owned land to develop additional perpetually affordable housing. Monitored lease agreement approved by Council and School Board. Staff is now working on the possible lot line adjustment for 575 Dorset Street (land behind former City Hall and Fire Department) to enable expanded affordable housing. Focus on making City‐owned land at 575 Dorset Street available for development as affordable housing.Encourage City staff to continue their work toward this goal and monitor these efforts. AHC, EDC Make recommendations to Council on how best to use ARPA funding for housing and economic developmentDone in collaboration with the Housing Trust Fund with unanimous committees support. RFP was issued in May 2022Continued from FY22: Make recommendations to Council on how best to use ARPA funding for housing and economic developmentReview proposals received in response to ARPA RFP and make recommendation. Provide input regarding how to invest remaining ARPA funds to address housing and climate change crises, such as weatherization.Recommended FY23 Priorities for Committee Proposed FY23 Strategies/Projects Committee ActionOpportunity OrientedFY22 Update (June 2022)Role of City Committee"This is how our resident committees can inform policy and Affordable and Community StrongCity of South Burlington ‐ Affordable Housing CommitteeFY22 and FY23 Policy Priorities & StrategiesAdopted by Council 11/15/21 and RecommendedRole of City Committee"This is how our resident committees can inform policy and FY22 Update (June 2022)
AHC Identify regulatory barriers and added costs of developing multi‐unit buildings and propose ways for SB to address them. Could include: waiver or reduction of city impact and permit fees for perpetually affordable developments. Not started Carry out research and make recommendations to encourage and enable redevelopment and make development of housing more affordable.Joint project of Redevelopment subcommittee and members of Economic Development Committee to identify (1) opportunities for and barriers to redevelopment of underutilized and vacant properties; (2) regulations that prevent higher density housing development, especially multifamily housing development; and/or (3) strategies to increase developers’ capacity to exceed the City’s Inclusionary Zoning requirement. Make recommendations as appropriate. AHC Articulate connections between dense housing development and climate change solutions. Ongoing Identify actions City can take that address both the housing and climate change crises. Provide input to the Climate Action Task Force on the content and recommendations included in the Task Force’s Report. AHC Review zoning districts city‐wide to identify additional locations for residential/mixed‐use zoning including conducting an inventory of vacant space.Redevlopment subcommittee Integrated into first proposed FY23 priority listed under Opportunity Oriented.See first proposed FY23 Strategy listed under Opportunity OrientedAHC Identify regulatory barriers and added costs of redeveloping areas of SB and propose ways to address themFormed Redevlopment subcommittee that talked with and visited with neighboring communities to learn best practices. Attended and gave input to Planning Commission meetings on the General PUD discussions and Shelburne Road. Supported ADU change to LDRs.Integrated into first proposed FY23 priority listed under Opportunity Oriented.See first proposed FY23 Strategy listed under Opportunity OrientedRecommended FY23 Priorities for CommitteeProposed FY23 Strategies/Projects Committee ActionAHC Propose an Impact Assessment Checklist for Council consideration. Requested that CCRPC convene a meeting on housing, climate change, and equity. Included language in the RFP for the use of ARPA funding a specific focus on BIPOC and New American households. Received a presentation from CCRPC on the ECOS Report and their focus on equity and inclusion.Propose that the City, in partnership with the School District, conduct an Equity Audit. Request that City Council use ARPA funds to underwrite the Equity Audit. Propose additional changes related to Equity.Request that City Council use ARPA funds to commission an Equity Audit, in collaboration with the School District. Propose inclusion of Equity chapter in update of Comprehensivs Plan. Advocate for City‐sponsored activities that commemorate Fair Housing Month (April 2023).FY22 Update (June 2022)Core Municipal Services and AdministrationRole of City Committee"This is how our resident committees can inform policy and
City of South Burlington
FY24 Policy Priorities & Strategies
Role of Council
"This is the vision for our community"
Committee Strategy Description
Comprehensive Plan Update
Green & Clean: Emphasizing sustainability for long-term viability of a clean and green South Burlington
Core Municipal Services and Administration
City Center and Tax Increment Financing District
Climate Action Plan
Role of Committee
"This is how our resident committees can inform policy and help implement policy."
Affordable and Community Strong: Creating a robust sense of place and opportunity for our residents and visitors.
Opportunity Oriented: Being a supportive and engaged member of the larger regional and statewide community.
Walkable: Bicycle and pedestrian friendly with safe transportation infrastructure.