Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0142 West Twin Oaks Terrace (2)September 11, 1984 Mr. Peter Bergh Box 4505 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Re: Twin Oaks Tennis Center Dear Mr. Bergh: Be advised that the Zoning Board of Adjustment has granted your request to expand the tennis center. Your proposal is subject to site plan approval by the Planning Commission. The Zoning Board will issue formal findings at a later date. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/mcq March 20, 1985 Katherine Vose AEC 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Dear Katherine: The South Burlington Planning Commission granted site plan approval to Twin Oaks Tennis (Burlington Indoor Tennis) on October 9, 1983. This expansion is in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City placid this applicant on its sewer waiting list for 900 gallons per day. Peter Bergh has produced evidence that this ex- pansion should require no more than 150 gallons per day. There is sufficient capacity at the Airport Parkway Plant to handle this amount. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg cc? Ann Heath William Szymanski I )10/9/84 JSB MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Peter Bergh for Burlington Indoor Tennis, Inc., for the construction of a 8500 square foot fitness center and nursery as depicted on a plan entitled "Twin Oaks Tennis and Fitness Center Master Plan" as prepared by Peter Bergh Associates, Shelburne, Vermont and latest revision dated 9/18/84 with the following stipualtions: 1) A fire alarm system will be installed at the applicant's expense to connect the existing building and the new building to the fire department. 2) A hose station will be installed at a location determined in consulation with the South Burlington Fire Chief. 3) The applicant shall provide verification from an architect or an engineer that the ventilating system is adequate"to remove smoke from the building if required. 4) A landscaping bond in the amount of $5000 shall be posted prior to permit. 5) Credit for existing vegetation is granted at $3000. 6) A sewer allocation of 900 gallons per day for the fitness center be made in accordance with the South Burlington Sewer Policy. 7) A drainage plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for his approval prior to permit. 8) Sidewalks shall be continuous across driveways at grade of existing drive- way. 9) The height will not exceed 35 feet. 10) This approval expires in 6 months. PETER BERGH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • SITE PLANNING • PLANNING • SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05-82 • (802) 425-2433 January 18,1985 Jane Bechtel, City Planner City Hall S. Burlington, VT 05401 RE: Twin Oaks 1985 Expansion, water/sewer needs Dear Jane: In 1.984, according to figures supplied to us by the South Burlington Water Department, Twin Oaks Tennis Center used 19,500 cu.ft. of,water. See below: 12/22/83 to 3/15/84 3,500 cu.ft. 03/16/84 to 6/15/84 7,900 cu.ft. (filled swimming pool) 06/16/84 to 9/15/85 3,900 cu.ft. 09/16/84 to 12/15/85 4,200 cu.ft. At the conversion rate of 7.48 gals. per cu.ft., this works out to 145,860 gals. Twin Oaks is open 360 days a year, and dividing 145,860 by 360 days gives a figure of 405 gpd. The usage is uniform over the entire year. Our membership for 1984 was approximately 1,300 people. With the proposed new addition we hope to build the membership to our target of 2,000 people within five years. The new facilities are essentially an expansion of the existing ones- court racket sports and exercise space. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that our water/sewer needs will be proportionally the same. Should our membership eventually reach the target figure of 2,000 people from its level of 1,300, this would represent a 35% increase in people using our facilities. Water consumption would also increase by approximately this same amount. Our present water consumption is 405 gpd. A 35% increase in consumption would be 142 gpd. Therefore, I estimate that the impact of our expansion will be in the range of one hundred and fifty (150) gallons per day. Sincerely, Peter Bergh, President Burlington Indoor Tennis Center cc: Paul Sprayregan ICV Construction !/ Ernest Christianson Twin Oaks, File STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BUTiLINGTON Re: Findings of Fact, application of Peter Bergh RD 4, Shelburne, Vermont On the 9th of October 19 84 , the South Bur ington P anning omm ss ion approved or ddhl)d the request of P un er Section 19.10 ofrthe South Burlington Zoning Regulations based on the following findings: 1, TRAFFIC ACCESS Access is adeguate with one twenty foot__ wide curb cut for the two parking lots 2. CIRCULATION AND PARKING - Seventy spaces exist and_34 new shall be.provided. Aisles shall be 20feet wide. 3. LANDSCAPING & SCREENING - $3000 credit shall be granted for existing landscaping A bond for $5000 for oroposed_land- scaping shall be posted prior to p2rmit. 4 OTHER: Height shall not exceed 35 feet Fire alarms, hose station and ventilation requirements shall be met as South Burlington Planninq Cbmmission DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 16 JUNE 2009 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 16 June 2009, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: M. Behr, Acting Chair; E. Knudsen, G. Quimby, R. Farley Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; C. LaRose, Associate Planner; M. Feitelberg, J. Jewitt, J. Wallace, T. Peterson, M. Hall, D. Burke, T. Shepard, E. & J. Goldberg, R. Lyon, S. Cosure, B. Gallagher, M. Young 1. Other Business & Announcements: Mr. Belair drew attention to the list of administrative site plan approvals. No issues were raised by the Board. The Chair noted that Agenda items # 12 through # 16 will all be continued to 7 July. 2. Minutes of 2 June 2009: The Minutes of 2 June 2009 were not available. 3. Consent Agenda: A. Robert Schumacher is requesting design review approval for a master sign permit for freestanding and wall signs for the property located at 370 Dorset St. in the Dorset Street/City Center Sign District. The master signage permit would also establish the design scheme for future tenants: It was noted that both the post and sign frame will be painted black. Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Miscellaneous Application #MS-09-03 of Michael Feitelberg for after -the - fact approval to alter the existing grade by resurfacing four outdoor tennis courts with more than 20 cubic yards of crushed stone and clay, 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace (Sports & Fitness Edge): Mr. Feitelberg said they had 4 concrete tennis courts that hadn't been used in a long time. These were resurfaced with crushed stone and clay instead of concrete. Staff had no issues. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Miscellaneous Application #MS-09-03 of Michael DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 16 JUNE 2009 PAGE 2 Feitelberg subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site Plan Application #SP-09-46 of CCTA to construct a 32 sq. ft. bus passenger shelter with an 84 sq. ft. slab, adjacent to 401 Dorset Street (Green Mountain Suites): Mr. Peterson said CCTA has eliminated the spur route around the Pines, but they wanted to provide some shelter for passengers. This will be a new style shelter, narrower and with a gentler arched roof. Mr. Belair noted that the shelter is in the city right-of-way and has been approved by Public Works. It lies between the bike path and the curb. Mr. Peterson noted it is about 40 feet down from the Green Mountain Suites building. Mr. Wallace said it could be close to the open windows of guest rooms, and they would prefer it to be further to the south. Mr. Peterson said they will try to have the back of the bus come as far from the building as possible. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-09-46 of CCTA subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Conditional Use Application #CU-09-04 of Omnipoint Communications, Inc., seeking approval to install three panel antennas mounted 67 feet in height on existing communications tower including ground mounted equipment, 30 Joy Drive (WCAX building); and 7. Site Plan Application #SP-09-45 of Omnipoint Communications, Inc., to amend a previously approved plan to: 1) install three panel antennas on existing communications tower, and 2) install ground mounted equipment in 12' x 12' area, 30 Joy Drive (WCAX building): Mr. Hall said there will be a total of 6 tenants on the tower. He added that nobody will notice the change. Mr. Behr noted that a height waiver is needed because it is over 35'. Mr. Belair said staff had no issues. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Conditional Use Application #SD-09-04 and Site Plan Application #SP-09-45 of Omnipoint Communications subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 1 � CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Permit # A�- 6q - ?j APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Type of application (check one): ( ) Appeal from decision of the Administrative Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation ( ) Request for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance Other PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY): WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING ? 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailcii g ddress, pho e & fax #): r w.�,Z-e S B V n r vr 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) U01 3) APPLIQ�ANT (WA.d�naame, mailing address, phone and fax #) // 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name, mailing address, phone & fax # if different from above): 3 Kw� 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: f It Z 6) TAX PARCEL ID #: 0 11 0 — 000 Gt 15_` 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): B. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): , UIW C. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings & existing building to remain): Y , LA D. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement & mezzanine): / , E. Number of residential Units (if applicable, new units & existing units to remain): A/ l 0, F. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing & proposed, note office vs. non -office employees): M) /A- G. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if overlay districts are gplicable): / �ft 8) LOT COVERAGE A. Total parcel size: Z. Sq. Ft. B. Buildings: Existing ` Z� % / Proposed L4A Sq. Ft Sq. Ft. C. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing t % / Sq. Ft. Proposed ,Yr� % l Sq. Ft. D. Total area to be disturbed during construction: r) IA- Sq. Ft. * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES A. Building (including interior renovations): $ N]%A B. Landscaping $_ l Uyu �') r eou C. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC: — JU /f k- A. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): B. A. M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): C. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 14) LIST ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS: (list names and address of all abutting property owners, including those across any street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet of paper if necessary): Tt..ai0J 0ABLS' Co K) i vh r rj 1, L vvA ✓"� a-i�i�. SSoc . r� . (;/C) f ro f Q, 0, r -to I �Ji1l+S�ai✓ gyp, 0 . -3 <00'' I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY -OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: S �� REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this application and find it to be: Ef COMPLF� ❑ Incomplete ,Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee ate south PLANNING & ZONING June 5, 2009 Burlington Indoor Tennis — Sports and Fitness Edge Attn: Michael Feitelberg 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace Dear Property Owner Enclosed is the draft agenda for the June 16, 2009 South Burlington Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburi.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802,846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com r wNo, southburlington PLANNING & ZONING June 5, 2009 Grandview Acres Condominium Association c/o Apple Tree Bay Property Management, RA PO Box 3009 Burlington, VT 05408 RE: 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace Dear Property Owner Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the June 16, 2009 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. The enclosure includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, �l Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com southburlington PLANNING & ZONING June 5, 2009 Twin Oaks Condominium Association, Inc. c/o Property Management Associates, RA PO Box 1201 Williston, VT 05495 RE: 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace Dear Property Owner Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the June 16, 2009 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. The enclosure includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com QW66,49 �0, southburlington PLANNING & ZONING June 18, 2009 Michael Feitelberg Sports and Fitness Edge 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace Dear Mr. Feitelberg: Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of Fact and Decisions rendered by the Development Review Board on June 16, 2009 (effective 6/2/09). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, " 4V�1� Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7008 0150 0003 6150 6628 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: June 11, 2009 drb\misc\budingtonTennis\burlingtontennis_fiIWoe Application received: May 22, 2009 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace Miscellaneous Application #MS-09-03 Meeting date: June 16, 2009 da #4 Applicant Michael Feitelberg Sports & Fitness Edge 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlinaton, VT 05403 Owners Burlington Indoor Tennis, Sports and Fitness Edge Inc 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Location Map Property Information Tax Parcel ID 0970-00095 C1-R15 Zoning District CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\misc\burlingtontennis fill.doc Michael Feitelberg, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking after -the -fact miscellaneous approval to alter the existing grade by resurfacing four (4) outdoor tennis courts with more than 20 cubic yards of crushed stone and clay, 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace. The applicant completed the work over the course of several years without any approvals or permits. The applicant previously received approval for the request by the Development Review Board on July 15, 2008 but still did not obtain a permit within the required time frame and therefore they must re -apply for approval. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair have reviewed the plans submitted on May 22, 2009 and have the following comments. This application shall be reviewed under Section 3.12 of the Land Development Regulations. The removal from land or the placing on land of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material in an amount equal to or greater than twenty (20) cubic yards, except when incidental to or in connection with the construction of a structure on the same lot, shall require the approval of the Development Review Board. The Development Review Board may grant such approval where such modification is requested in connection with the approval of a site plan, planned unit development or subdivision plat. This section does not apply to the removal of earth products in connection with a resource extraction operation. Standards and Conditions for Approval: (1) The Development Review Board shall review a request under this Section for compliance with the standards contained in this sub -Section 3.12(B). An application under Section 3.12(A) above shall include the submittal of a site plan, planned unit development or subdivision plat application showing the area to be filled or removed, and the existing grade and proposed grade created by removal or addition of material. The proposed changes will not result in any substantial change in grade. The applicant is proposing less than one foot of grade change across the subject area. (2) The Development Review Board, in granting approval may impose any conditions it deems necessary, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) Duration or phasing of the permit for any length of time. The applicant has noted that this fill is used to refinish existing tennis courts. For this reason, staff does not recommend a time limit on the placement of the fill. (b) Submission of an acceptable plan for the rehabilitation of the site at the conclusion of the operations, including grading, seeding and planting, fencing drainage, and other appropriate measures. 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\misc\burlingtontennis fill.doc The proposed location of the fill will result in useable tennis courts. Staff does not recommend any further action with regards to this criterion. (c) Provision of a suitable bond or other security adequate to assure compliance with the provisions of this Section. Staff does not feel this requirement will be necessary for the subject application. (d) Determination of what shall constitute pre -construction grade under Section 3.07, Height of Structures. The pre -construction height for future development will be the existing grade. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the DRB approve miscellaneous application #MS-09-03. Respectfully submitted, y Cathyanh LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Michael Feitelberg for Applicant Sports & Fitness Edge, Inc. Tennis Court Rehabilitation Project For over 10 years the 4 outdoor cement tennis courts located behind our building have gone unused due to many cracks and deterioration of the surface. Additionally trees and shrubs abutting the courts became very overgrown and the entire area became very visually unappealing. This past spring, we decided to revitalize the courts. The main thrust of the project was selecting what and how we would resurface the courts. We selected clay based on it's appeal to members due to its softer playing surface and longevity. It also would allow us not to be forced to grind up the existing courts which is a loud, messy, costly project. Therefore we have hired Vermont Tennis Courts to resurface the 4 courts with red clay This will result in a surface consisting of approximately 6 inches of crushed stone with 4 inches of clay on top. The outside perimeter of the fence has a 6 inch high border of stone which will be bordered by brick. This supports the court surface and provides drainage consistent with what is currently there. We will also be revitalizing the landscaping in between and around the courts to be more aesthetically pleasing and with the hopes that it will be returned to its original state. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to eve ry been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon rson recce receipt of r body notice of a earing d having the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the peal to appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: NIME�f ((�E `GT Y"�J�J-%kej r-c;4A) : ( (A I� P4 "ms MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST V(z � -Tw �c�,CS D '� � sAOO- s t r- %PfS.3 rs �� 55- Ea f -err 53- /,s7 7,-, c, 12 f Uri Pr' - 1�sa�x )J, Vt mw�l i Sir c,..;-))s���► ci� oua rr y Jfr 1I J"L'ry e-G �' koI i1 C I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to eve been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)() eUpon rson orecce receipt of r body notice of a earing d having the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the peal to appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE. MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST IMIA T l�n J e1f 1�ok(xs ZA Vikc.e— ! L QN, -'_� ©� y SS- s V-1 ?4. I eavod W 7�—'Wcvl CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: Tior- N'AM'E �L��C MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST I Permit Number APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month . That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing. Type of application check one: ( ) Appeal from decision of Administrator Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation) ( ) Request for a conditional use ()Request for a variance PC -Other PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY) WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING? 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing �c•t,�lws .. 0AJ2zsL �1 orv.M... --<SDS.'L.a/1— and fax # 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #)y u ( (OL/ Aoz-u�z, 411 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) rN►,�Sl,o,.Q —dao 1 (P 1 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Gam_ 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) E 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) c) Total building square footage on property (Moposed buildings did existing buildings to remain) �%� k d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) #074 e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) &Y-d f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing Z 5" % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing t! Z % Proposed% c) Front yard (along each street) Existing _% Proposed NIA % (does not apply to residential uses) } 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ YJ1A b) Landscaping: $ QOj Oty e-7L. M(- c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC — N/& a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14) LIST ABUTTERS ( List names and addresses of all abutting property owners on a separate sheet of paper). Timmy\ cmc5 �onc�orn� nmm �II�s1C,�-P1; , I tx - cym\/( ,�) k (25 Ccxyr,lnu,m kac I Cl4 - wtelYec. e-)01 P KyV -- i P 4 - Ti o 3cxc) 1V osgoz 3 4 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGN TURE c-- SIGNATURE OF PROPER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: �?MP REVIEW AUTHOYJTY: /❑ Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewXd this site plan application and find it to be: Complete Zoning or Designee 4 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: July 10, 2008 drb\misc\burlingtonTennis\burlingtontennis_fill.doc Application received: June 19, 2008 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace Miscellaneous Application #MS-08-05 Meeting date: July 15, 2008 • . ;� Applicant Property Information Michael Feitelberg Tax Parcel ID 0970-00095 Sports & Fitness Edge C1-R15 Zoning District 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Owners Burlington Indoor Tennis, Sports and Fitness Edge Inc 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\misc\burlingtontennis fill doc Sports and Fitness Edge, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking miscellaneous approval to alter the existing grade by resurfacing four (4) outdoor tennis courts with more than 20 cubic yards of crushed stone and clay, 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace. COMMENTS Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair have reviewed the plans submitted on June 19, 2008 and have the following comments. This application shall be reviewed under Section 3.12 of the Land Development Regulations. The removal from land or the placing on land of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other similar material in an amount equal to or greater than twenty (20) cubic yards, except when incidental to or in connection with the construction of a structure on the same lot, shall require the approval of the Development Review Board. The Development Review Board may grant such approval where such modification is requested in connection with the approval of a site plan, planned unit development or subdivision plat. This section does not apply to the removal of earth products in connection with a resource extraction operation. Standards and Conditions for Approval (1) The Development Review Board shall review a request under this Section for compliance with the standards contained in this sub -Section 3.12(B). An application under Section 3.12(A) above shall include the submittal of a site plan, planned unit development or subdivision plat application showing the area to be filled or removed, and the existing grade and proposed grade created by removal or addition of material. The proposed changes will not result in any substantial change in grade. The applicant is proposing less than one foot of grade change across the subject area. (2) The Development Review Board, in granting approval may impose any conditions it deems necessary, including, but not limited to, the following: (a) Duration or phasing of the permit for any length of time. The applicant has noted that this fill is used to refinish existing tennis courts. For this reason, staff does not recommend a time limit on the placement of the fill. (b) Submission of an acceptable plan for the rehabilitation of the site at the conclusion of the operations, including grading, seeding and planting, fencing drainage, and other appropriate measures. The proposed location of the fill will result in useable tennis courts. Staff does not recommend any further action with regards to this criterion. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\misc\burlingtontennis fill doc (c) Provision of a suitable bond or other security adequate to assure compliance with the provisions of this Section. Staff does not feel this requirement will be necessary for the subject application. (d) Determination of what shall constitute pre -construction grade under Section 3.07, Height of Structures. The pre -construction height for future development will be the existing grade. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the DRB approve miscellaneous application #MS-08-05. Respectfully submitted, XaAthqyanaLaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Michael Feitelberg for Applicant 1 r southburlinaon PLANNING & ZONING April 30, 2009 Mike Feitelburg Sports and Fitness Edge 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Expiration of Miscellaneous Approval # MS-08-05 Dear Mr. Feitelburg: Please be advised that miscellaneous approval #MS-08-05 to resurface four (4) outdoor tennis courts issued on 7/15/08 has expired. This approval expired due to the failure to obtain a zoning permit for the work within six (6) months of the approval as required by condition #3 of said approval. You must now submit an application for re -approval as soon as possible or face legal action for having done this work without a permit. I look forward to receiving your application soon. Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com South Burlington Planning Zoning 'si New Non -Residential Construction Impact Fees '� Grand List April 1, 2008 Project Name & Address 99 Swift Street Property Owner Niniety Nine Swift Street Associates, LLC Effective Date 4/1/10 TOTAL IMPACT FEE $9,7ii.78 Value of New Construction: Tvne of Construction Type of Use Fireproofed Steel Skeleton or Reinforced Concrete Masonry or Concrete SF Bearing SF Wall Structure Wood Frame Structure Pre -Fab Steel SF Structure SF Industrial/Manufacturing S66 S69 S65 S64 Engineering & Research S88 S96 S93 S88 General Office S123 S113 silo 0 S104 Medical Office S133 S71 S69 S67 General Retail S84 S54 51 S41 Auto Service Facility S84 S81 S78 Elder Care Facility 102 S74 S72 S72 Motel Sprinkler credit? (Enter 1 if yes) Total Value of New Structure: Total Value of New Structure & Contents: Current grand list value of property: Past payments credit: Post construction value of structure & land Future payments credit: Base fee: NET FIRE PROTECTION IMPACT FEE: PM Peak Hour VTEs Past payments credit: Future payments credit: OTHER CREDITS: ROAD IMPACT FEE: �1�557 27 $2,120.40 $11,140.26 1 $0 $0.0 $2,232,060 $758.88 $2,232,000.00 $669.6o $0.00 -$1,428.48 04/30/2009 Ci _ of South Burlington Grand L. .t Page 1 of 1 09:28 am Parcel Report jbeagley For Parcel: 1700-00099. NINETY NINE SWIFT STREET ASSOCIATES LLC Name NINETY NINE SWIFT STREET ASSOCIATES LLC P.O. BOX 421 BURLINGTON VT 05407 Location 911 99 SWIFT ST Tax Map 37-026-000 Codes: (1) (Category)C (Equipment) (Owner)C Wood Crop Pasture Other Site Total Acres: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.20 Real Land Building Equipment Inventory Values: 2,232,000 310,000 1,922,000 0 0 Homestead Veterans Farm Stab. L.U. Acres Land Use 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Contract Lease Prev. Egpm Land Use Amt Prev. Real 0 0.00 0 0.00 2,232,000 Housesite Special Exmp Grand List 0.00 0.00 22,320.00 Misc: Status: T Bill #: 55056 Updated: 04/25/2008 Last sale was: Invalid on 09/25/2002 for $0 recorded on 567/645 Grievance Info: Flag: N Remarks: (1) Misc Fields: (0): 150473000 (8) : N (9): 03/12/01 SPAN: 600-188-14444 Was � :900100� southburlington PLANNING & ZONING July 16, 2008 Mike Feitelburg Sports & Fitness Edge 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Miscellaneous Application #MS-08-05 Dear Ms. Adams: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board on July 15, 2008 (effective July 15, 2008). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, &OvjT-)u Betsy Mc onough Brown Planning 6r Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7008 0150 0003 6150 5843 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com July 7, 2008 Burlington Indoor Tennis Sports & Fitness Edge, Inc. Attn: Mike Feitelburg 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is the draft agenda for the July 15, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 515 Darsmt: Street SaulS Surlingylon, YT D5401 eel RD2- 4SS 41'lltl iax Iltl .546AM wew%1%IbHrf C 0 M July 7, 2008 Twin Oaks Condominium Master Association, Inc. c/o Property Management, Associates, Inc., Registered Agent PO Box 1201 Williston, VT 05495 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the July 15, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (ww�v.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 615 Dars- t Stro t Snulh Rarlingla'a, YT D5403 Vel NGLOWIIM ism, 002.046AIGI mac .z�iuc�.e�e�a July 7, 2008 Grandview Acres Condominium Association, Inc. c/o Appletree Bay Property Management, Registered Agent PO Box 3009 Burlington, VT 05408 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the July 15, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 'M Dursat Strea.t. South uthintlen, YT DS40 lei 109415,a: 04 I' as E� �.,0�rr.��t11 wvr Wtbsaelxam south!rl�ngton PLAN*fNG & ZONI kG July 10, 2008 Mike Feitelburg Sports & Fitness Edge 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, VT 05103 Re: 142 West Twin Oaks Hearing Dear Mr. Feitelburg: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, July 15, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dur50t Str0st S-Outh Aurlingla", WT B5403 1*1 802_84 .t,la fax 80 .54 .4101 w w zburl.msam Sports & Fitness Edge, Inc. Tennis Court Rehabilitation Project For over 10 years the 4 outdoor cement tennis courts located behind our building have gone unused due to many cracks and deterioration of the surface. Additionally trees and shrubs abutting the courts became very overgrown and the entire area became very visually unappealing. This past spring, we decided to revitalize the courts. The main thrust of the project was selecting what and how we would resurface the courts. We selected clay based on it's appeal to members due to its softer playing surface and longevity. It also would allow us not to be forced to grind up the existing courts which is a loud, messy, costly project. Therefore we have hired Vermont Tennis Courts to resurface the 4 courts with red clay. This will result in a surface consisting of approximately 6 inches of crushed stone with 4 inches of clay on top. The outside perimeter of the fence has a 6 inch high border of stone which will be bordered by brick. This supports the court surface and provides drainage consistent with what is currently there. We will also be revitalizing the landscaping in between and around the courts to be more aesthetically pleasing and with the hopes that it will be returned to its original state. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX, (802) 846-4101 February 2, 2005 Mike Feitelburg Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Minutes -- 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace Dear Mr. Feitelburg: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the January 18, 2005 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, a� Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 JANUARY 2005 ',Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-04-92 of Charles DesLaur►ers to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of: 1) a 184 unit congregate housing facility and 2) a 104 unit extended hotel in two buildings. The amendment consists of installing a 10'x15 concrete pad for a walk-in cooler addition, 401 Dorset Street: Mr. Bruce showed the location on the plan. He said this will not be visible from the street. The pad will contain walk-in coolers which will be screened. Mr. Belair noted that the approval motion contains a landscaping waiver. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-04-92 of Charles Deslauriers subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Public Hearing: Application #CU-04-17 of Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness for conditional use approval under Section 14.10 Conditional Use Review of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Request is for permission to allow as accessory uses to an existing indoor & outdoor recreationai facility, the following uses: 1) short-order restaurant (snack bar), 2) personal service (hair salon) and 3) retail store (pro shop), 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace: and 5 Site Plan Application #SP-04-51 of Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness to amend a previously approved 75,000 sq ft indoor recreational facility and outdoor recreational facility. The amendment consists of allowing as accessory uses the following uses: 1) short-order restaurant (snack bar), 2) personal service (hair salon) and 3) retail store (pro shop), 1142 West Twin Oaks Terrace: Mr. Dinklage asked if the snack bar would be open to the public. Mr. Feitelberg said they wouldn't turn anyone away, but they will not advertise to the public. Mr. Dinklage also noted there is a question of whether the dumpster is adequate. Mr.. Feitelberg said he understands it is now up to code. Mr. Belair noted this is a reapproval. The applicant didn't get a permit in time. As far as he knows, the dumpster is up to code. Mr. Feitelberg said they didn't get their permit on time because of an issue with a light. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Application #CU-04-17 and Site Plan Application #SP- 04-51 of Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr.. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. -2- CITY OF SOUTH BU LINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BtiRLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 20, 2005 Mike Feitelburg Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Conditional Use Application #CU-04-17 & Site Plan Application #SP-04-51 Dear Mr. Solai: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on 1/18/05 (effective 1/18/05). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, 8 Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested - #7003 3110 0001 3598 5077 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Permit Number APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month . That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing. Type of application check one: ( Wques peal fromdecision of Administrator Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation) t. for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance ( ) Other PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY) WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING? 1) OWNER OF, RECORD (Name as shown on deed 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) LRZ)L . / 6 (/ 4 I �1 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) V" r K i 4 ErKctr 4tt, 11 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0 cj-7Q —owl d^ 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) e J. #2 __24---. _ lr, / a- ... A e'7 .... _' c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) / 6 / -CA- r ,-• C.'C'k' ;, e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to r%9l -. Xk .__ . j. _. _ _ I A,0L 0 J -. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing�� % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing ,�% Proposed ' % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed 1AJ %'1% (does not apply to residential uses) WA 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations) b) Landscaping: $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 04 - 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire pr, b) A.M. Peak hour for entire propert c) P.M. Peak hour for entire properV 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATIOl 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMP 14) LIST ABUTTERS ( List names and addresses of all abutting property owners on a separate sheet of paper). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE VAPPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: n/VN REVIEW AUTHORITY: ET/Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: LJ Complete ❑ Incomplete Planning & Zoning or Designee A EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the plans. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. o Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible). o Survey data (distance and acreage). o Contours (existing and finished). o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety, and size) as required in Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations. o Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping. o Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. o Zoning boundaries. o Number and location of parking spaces (as required under Section 13.01(b) of the Land Development Regulations). o Number and location of handicapped spaces (as required under Section 13.01(I) of the Land Development Regulations). o Location of septic tanks (if applicable). o Location of any easements. o Lot coverage information: Building footprint, total lot, and front yard. o North arrow. o Name of person or firm preparing site plan and date. o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All lights should be down casting and shielded. o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be screened). o Bicycle rack as required under Section 13.01(G)(5) of the Land Development Regulations. o If restaurant is proposed, provide number of seats and square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed seats. APPLICATION FEE ❑ Appeal of Administrative Officer $ 110.00* ❑ Conditional Use $ 135.00* ❑ Miscellaneous $ 85.00* ❑ Variance $ 135.00* *includes $10.00 recording fee Permit Number SP- I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) C 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) I . I Ott 'V06, y/ 01 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) del (C,H14.1E 1, {' K c7'CL(5f/Lk-- ( S C,_y tnvUSW4 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: C C/ L LJ _0- T(,,� 6ck.ma, 7���� 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) o51 O - (Doc oil 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Prope (including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use d existing uses to remai4l& LO I S I',GNA 644on ��-� �P.� � A �a-v cJ4/Ll c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of � ors (pro buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) ai-' e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) Q f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 1 2 — I!�r 4,., . 1_ru,r , ,.P— ek_4� � 1 sf g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing_ % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parkin , outside storage, etc) Existing_% Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing %, Proposed't-� % 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ b) Landscaping: $ 6 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 6'/d'l. 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): /VJ4 b) A.M. Peak hour for entire proper c) P.M. Peak hour for entire propert 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATIO: 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMP 14) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11 " x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 2 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE O ICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed thissite plan and find it to be: Incomplete o%% goy U` ive Officer or Designee Date EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following informa ' n must be shown on the plans. Please submit five (5) copy (I I " x 17") of the pl . Failure to provide the following information wi ,l being rejected and a delay the review before the Development Review arc 0 Lot drawn to scale (2k feet scale if possible). 0 Survey data (distance d acreage). O Contours (existing and nished). O Proposed landscaping sc edule (number, variety, and c O O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 Land Development Regul tions. Location of streets, abuttin properties, fire Existing and proposed curb ts, pavement, Zoning boundaries.. Number and location of parkin paces (as i Development Regulations). Number and location of handicappe spac , Development Regulations). Location of septic tanks (if applicable). Location of any easements. Lot coverage information: Building f tpri North arrow. and one reduced in your application ) as required in Section 13.06(G) of the existing buildings, existing landscaping. under Section 13.01(B) of the Land (as required under Section 13.01(I) of the Land total lot, and front yard. Name of person or firm preparing s' a plan and ate. Exterior lighting details (cut sheets . All lights s oulc Dumpster locations (dumpsters m st be screened). Bicycle rack as required under S tion 13.01(G)(5) If restaurant is proposed, provid number of seats and patron use but not containing fi ed seats. ❑ Site Plan ❑ Amended Site Plan ❑ Administrative Site *includes $10.00 recording fee be down casting and shielded. the Zoning Regulations. kquare footage of floor area provided for APPLICATION FEE review) 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: January 3, 2005 \drb\sit\twin_oaks_siteplan_&_conditional.doc Plans received: December 2, 2004 TWIN OAKS — 142 TWIN OAKS TERRACE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION #CU-04-17 SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-04-51 Agenda #4 & 5 Meeting date: January 18, 2005 Owner Applicant Burlington Indoor Tennis Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness 142 Twin Oaks Terrace 142 Twin Oaks Terrace S. Burlington, VT 05403 S. Burlington, VT 05403 Property Information Tax Parcel 0970-00095-C R7 District 5.52 Acres Location Map 7. it * , Tierr TOO WEI l s subject Property r ' S µ, .}.yam. � � � AF i y,� IAl4 N' • • � Al r owl h, A •,, r: '' a 9 41 .i S" ` Y • .'k4+'�a6AM Ali rw '�'W. u'"q'._. + '..y, •. Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting site plan and conditional use approval to amend a previously approved 75,000 square foot indoor recreational facility and outdoor recreational facility. The amendment consists of allowing as accessory uses the following uses: 1) short-order restaurant, 2) personal service, and 3) retail store, 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace. The subject property contains 5.52 acres and is located in the Residential 7 (R7) Zoning District. The applicant received approval from the Development Review Board for this project on February 3, 2004. However, the applicant failed to obtain a zoning permit within six (6), pursuant to Section 17.04(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Thus, the approval became null and void. The subject application is for reapproval of the same project. Associate Planner Brian Robertson and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, , referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on December 2, 2004 and have the following comments. Staff discovered that the proposed accessory uses currently exist without permits. Therefore, this application is to bring the property into compliance with the Land Development Regulations. ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Table 1. Dimensional Requirements R7 Zoning District Required Proposed Min. Lot Size 40,000 SF 240,451 SF �l Max. Building Coverage 40% 25% Max. Total Coverage 60% 42% Max. Front Yard Covera a 30% n/a Min. Front Setback 30 ft. n/a �l Min. Side Setback 10 ft. n/a Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. n/a zoning compliance CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 14.10(E) of the Land Development Regulations the proposed conditional use shall meet the following standards-, 1. The proposed use, in its location and operation, shall be consistent with the ON planned character of the area as defined by the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. The subject application is for "after the fact' approval for an existing indoor recreational facility to accommodate a short order restaurant, a personal service space, and a retail space. This indoor recreational facility is already in existence, and is consistent with the planned character of the area. 2. The proposed use shall conform to the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed use is located. According to Section 4.04 of the Land Development Regulations, the R7 Zoning District is formed to encourage high -density residential development. The district is located in areas that are near shopping areas, schools, and public transportation facilities and that are served by roads capable of carrying high traffic volumes. Offices and specified other commercial uses may be permitted within any district in locations that have direct access to arterial and collector streets and that will not adversely affect residential properties. The subject indoor recreational facility is already in existence. It has direct access to arterial and collector streets and does not adversely affect the surrounding residential properties. 3. The Development Review Board must find that the proposed uses will not adversely affect the following: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. Staff does not believe that the proposed project will adversely affect municipal services. (b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, or ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses. Staff believes that the proposal is in keeping with character of uses on surrounding properties and will not adversely affect the character of the area or the ability to develop adjacent properties. (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. The proposed project will not affect traffic in the vicinity. (d) Bylaws in effect. The proposed project is in keeping with applicable regulations. (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. The proposed project will not affect renewable energy resources. (t) General public health and welfare. 3 The proposed project will not affect general public health and welfare. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The subject building is already in existence, so the transition form site to structure and from structure to structure is not applicable. The proposed project is an accessory use to the indoor recreational facility. Therefore, the parking requirement for the subject property will remain the same as the most recent approval. On July 18, 1998, the South Burlington Planning Commission approved the subject property with 126 parking spaces. This approval included a waiver for a 10 parking space (7.4%) shortfall. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The parking on the subject property is already in existence, so this requirement is not applicable. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The subject building is already in existence, so this requirement is not applicable. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The subject building is already in existence, so this requirement is not applicable. (t} Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. CI The subject building is already in existence, so this requirement is not applicable. Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not feel it is necessary to require any additional access to abutting properties. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Staff has already stated that pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enc/osure(s). The plans submitted for the proposed project were last revised in 1987, so the current location of the dumpster in not depicted. However, the property does contain an adequate dumpster. (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements There is no additional landscaping and/or screening requirement resulting from he proposed project. Access/Circulation Access and circulation on the property will remain unchanged through the proposed project. Traffic Traffic will remain unchanged through the proposed project. Other 1. The plans shall be revised to depict all existing and proposed lighting on the subject property, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. In addition, the floodlight on the westerly 67 side of the building and the pole -light at the northerly entrance to the property shall be tipped downwards, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 2. The plans shall be revised to depict a bicycle rack on the subject property, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 3. The plans shall be revised to depict the sidewalk on the westerly side of the subject property, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 4. The plans shall be revised to depict the dumpster on the property, adequately screened, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Conditional Use application #CU-04-19 and Site Plan application #SP-04-51, conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items in the "Comments" section of this document. Respectful submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Copy to: Michael Feitelberg, Applicant C0 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 FEBRUARY 2004 Dinklage said an approval of the berms tonight would not preclude any enforcement if it is found that there is a violation causing problems on neighboring lots. Mr. Belair explained that on the original plan only existing contours were shown. He said it would be impossible for a developer to show proposed grading of single family lots when they have no idea of the placement of a house, driveway, etc. He said he will look at the site when the snow is gone to see if there are any plan violations. Mr. Boucher said he was not sure he agreed. It seemed that materials got moved from one place on the site to another. Ms. Smichenko said they had no water in their backyard previous to this development but do have water now. Mr. Boucher said he wants to see a plan that reflects what will actually be on the site. He wanted to see any changes being made to the berms to address the grass swale issue, and he wanted assurance that there will be no trees/shrubs on the berms. Mr. Dinklage asked if the contours shown on the plan will be the final ones. Mr. Marshall said no. He agreed that the plan should reflect what is actually there. Mr. Kupferman moved to continue final plat application #SD-03-02 of JAM Golf until 2 March 2004. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. �sPublic Hearing: Application # CU-03-20 of Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness for conditional e approval under Section 14.10 Conditional Use Review of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Request is for permission to allow as accessory uses to an existing indoor and outdoor recreational facility, the following uses: 1) short-order restaurant (snack bar), 2) personal service (hair salon), and 3) retail store (pro -shop), 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace: and __(6. ite Plan Application #SP-03-51 of Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness to amend a previously approved 75,000 sq. ft. indoor recreational facility and outdoor recreational facility. The amendment consists of allowing as accessory uses the following uses: 1) short-order restaurant (snack bar), 2) personal service (hair salon), and 3) retail store (pro -shop), 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace: Mr. Dinklage noted the request is for "as -built" changes that were made without approval of the DRB. He cautioned the applicant that this should not happen again. Mr. Feitelberg agreed. Mr. Belair noted there are no changes in the size of the building or in membership of the Fitness center. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Application #CU-03-20 and Site Plan #SP-03-51 of Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. - 3 - Xv T"RIN AKS ww-4. O I crw 'V Awl ITN E ESS�C r -477 .;r 7-I-IwA -t-Ow w�z 11L ih OA, tj A X4 ICIC/So ZT� jL L-4 Pi if CLI/ stir ro 1-4 .2., AJ7- - Of "V/,v v I. open rnoay - a.m. - 5 p.m. 802- Shoppers welcome, ranted. TO FLORIDA AFTER feed companion/share . 985-8711. NT? Considering adop- can help! We specialize ing families with birth nationwide. Toll free, 24 Jay 866-921-0565. One Adoptions. (AAN CAN) IT NEW WRITERS: The for Alternative .in, supported by the on of Alternative News and by alternative ke this one, seeks expe- ninority journalists and (college seniors and paid summer writing at Northwestern :y's Medill School of ;m, Chicago. The eight- igram, June 19 - August aims to recruit tal- inority writers into the ve press and train them :ine-style feature writ - participants will be cho- paid $3000 + housing at allowances. White the is designed to encour- )rity writers to consider n the alternative press, es of any ethnicity may rr information visit ,ww.medilLnorthwest 'aaj or write for an on: Academy for ive Journalism, stern University, Medill f Journalism, 1845 Rd, Evanston, IL :mail altacademy@ stern.edu. Application February 11, 2005. stern University is an iportunity educator and r. (AAN CAN) :ertainment 11 DANCERS featuring ng wild for your next , bachelor party or fun - show. 802-658-1464. :nt welcome. ►fessional '.s. ER SWEDISH MASSAGE, >ry with Big Sur long driving for airports, s. Hairdressing and :are for elderly. Call qi, 864-6213. DAY PARTY your palate rget. Specialty platters e parties/personalized or house parties. Contact foods@yahoo.com or ;-4840. LAIN VALLEY HOME : From window and door nent to decks, siding, interior finish and every - between. Contact 343-7861. E BASEMENT EXPERTS: iced basement renova- LCI. Turn your basement sable family space. :es, competitive pricing. i8. 664-141n` _-- We make house calls• A+ CERTIFIED COMPUTER REPAIR by excellent techni- cians. Low rates, fast turn- around. Refurbished computers available. ReCycle North Tech Services, 266 Pine St., Burlington, 658-4143 ext. 23. COMPUTER REPAIRS AND UPGRADES: PCs, Macs, network- ing, web design, tutoring, digi- tal graphics and audio editing. Competitive rates. Many refer- ences. House calls and in -shop. Free quote, 864-7470 orin- housecomp@verizon.net. GREEN MOUNTAIN COMPUTER Consultants: We build, service and install anything PC. Home theater! Custom service, we don't just make it work, we keep it working! Free consultation, house calls of course. The best will cost you less! greenmtn@ adelphia.net or 802-318-1924. ► financial A CASH NOW OFFER: Turn future money from lawsuit set- tlements, lottery awards and annuity payments into cash now. Free quotes. 800-815-3503 or www.ppicash.com. (AAN CAN) ► cleaning svcs. HOUSE CLEANING: For a reli- able, thorough home cleaner with 3 years, experience and refs., call 802-860-2428. THE CLEAN TEAM: Residential and commercial cleaning service. Also offering move -in, move -out and construction clean-up. Locally owned/operated. Guaranteed. Call The Clean Team today. 310-6770. ► photography MODELS WANTED: Looking for a few aspiring F models interested in the commercial/fashion indus- try. Must be between 15-35 and have very good complexion. Uni- que opportunity for free experi- ence, portfolio and help breaking into the industry. Contact Dave, 862-1172 or email rustdp@juno .com or http://www.rustdp. com. ► tutoring SPANISH: New beginning course starting in January at the Gaiter School. Improve your Spanish comprehension and speaking skills with a native and experienced teacher. Ongoing classes. Courses conveniently located at the Gaiter School (Mondays, Shelburne) and in Montpelier (Tuesdays). Reasonable rates, with instruction tailored to your individual needs. Free info, 917-364-3123 or con- stanciag@123spanisnow.com. MAPLE STUDY DESK: 26 inches x 48 inches. Keyboard pull-out. $50. 879-3022, please call before 9 p.m. ► sports equip. SHAPED ROSSIGNOL SKIES w/bindings. Very good condition. Bandit X 177 cm, $175. Viper X9.3 184 cm, $95. 496-7111, evenings. YAKIMA RACK SYSTEM: 1 steel head bike carrier w/Locks. Cross bars. Q towers w/clips for Saturn. $125/OBO. 802-467-8583. ► music for sale CELLOS, STRING BASSES, VIO- LINS, VIOLAS: New and old instruments, sales, restoration and repair. Experienced Luthiers. Paul Perley Cellos, in business since 1988. 802-229-1501, pperleycellos@aol.com. YAMAHA PSR-630 PIANO KEY- BOARD: Weighted keys, comput- er interface. Original cost, $800. Will sell for $350. 879-3022, please call before 9 p.m. ► music services CD MANUFACTURING: Give us a call and see why over 200 of New England's top musicians trust us with their CD manufac- turing. Great prices and excellent service! Call Charles Eller Studios at 802-425-3508. COSMIC HILL RECORDING: MIDI and production services. Years of experience in writing, playing, recording and produc- tion. Dedicated to making your music sound great. $25 per hour. 496-3166. Moretown, VT. QUESTION MARK PRODUC- TIONS: Audio engineering/pro- duction, live sound, recording. 802-578-9356. ® musicians wanted KEYBOARDIST WANTED FOR 5- PIECE BAND: Originals and cov- ers. Rock and R & B. For audition, Leave message at 802-734-0602. ► music instruct. DRUM LESSONS: Work w/a pro- fessional, energetic drummer w/BFA in jazz. 6 years' experi- ence in touring rock band (US and Europe) and a great atti- tude. Beginners welcome. Refs. avail. Contact Steve, 658-6205, thadhad@hotmaii.com. GUITAR: All styles/levels. Emphasis on developing strong technique, thorough musician- ship, personal style. Paul Asbell (Unknown Blues Band, Kiliman- jaro, Sneakers Jazz Band, etc.), 862-7696, www.pauLasbetL.com. needs. Into, 917 or constanciag@?131Z3 ishnow.co m or www.123sknow.com. ► legals CITY OF BURLINGTON TRAFFIC REGULATIONS The following traffic regulations are hereby enacted by the Public Works Commission as amend- ments to Appendix C, Motor Vehicles, and the City of Burlington's Code of Ordinances: Sec. 27. No parking except with resident parking permit. No person shall park any vehicle except vehicles with a valid resi- dent parking permit or a valid guest pass and cLearly identifi- able service of delivery vehicles on any street designated as "res- idential parking." (a) As Written (b) As Written (c) As Written (d) As Written (e) Specific criteria for this sec- tion is as follows: (1) through (8) As Written (9) Designation of area.'Only streets within the following des- ignated areas may be designated for resident -only parking. Those areas are: 1. Bounded by North Street, Willard Street, Main Street, Union Street, Beech Street, Deforest Road, Deforest Heights and generally the city limits to the east, but not including Willard and Union Streets where these streets define the bound- ary, except that resident -only parking may be imposed 2n South Willard Street from Cliff Street to Howard Street and in front of 331, 325, 321 and 309 South Willard Street. (2) through (5) As Written Adopted this 6th day of October 2004 by the Board of Public Works Commissioners: Attest Norm Baldwin, P.E. Assistant Director -Technical Services Adopted 10/6/2004; Published 12/22/04; Effective 1/12/05 Materials in (Brackets] delete. Material underlined add. Probate Court Form No. 32 Notice to Creditors STATE OF VERMONT PROBATE COURT DISTRICT OF CHITTENDEN IN RE THE ESTATE OF OLGA M. HALLOCK LATE OF HUNTINGTON, VERMONT DOCKET NO. NOTICE TO CREDITORS To the creditors of the estate Olga M. HaLLock late of Huntington. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVEL- OPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, January 18, 2005, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Final plat application #SD-04- 88 of Randall Hart to subdivide a 1.2 acre parcel developed with a single family dwelling into two (2) lots of 13,000 sq ft (Lot #1) and 39,690 sq ft (lot #2), 251 Shunpike Road. 2. Application #CU-04-17 of Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness for conditional use approval under Section 14.10 Conditional Use Review of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Request is for permission to allow as accessory uses to an indoor and outdoor recreational facility, the following uses: 1) short-order restaurant (snack bar), 2) personal service (hair salon), and 3) retail shop (pro - shop), 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace. 3. Application #CU-04-16 of Vignesh SoLai for conditional use approval under Section 14.10 Conditional Use Review of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Request is for permission to allow an accessory residential unit, 8 Laurel Hill Drive. 4. Application #VR-04-02 of George Hubbard seeking a vari- ance from Section 3.10, Accessory Structures and Uses c the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The request is for permission to allow a detached accessory structure (retaining wall) to be placed in the front yard, 6 Park Road. 5. Final plat application #SD-04- 92 of Charles DesLauriers to amend a previously approved planned unit development con- sisting of. 1) a 184 unit congre- gate housing facility and 2) a 104 unit extended stay hotel in two (2) buildings. The amend- ment consists of installing a 10' x 15' concrete pad for a walk-in cooler addition, 401 Dorset Street. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John DinkLage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board December 22, 2004 STATE OF VERMONT DISTRICT OF CHITTENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 January 14, 2005 Michael Feitelburg Burlington Indoor Tennis 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace Dear Mr. Feitelburg: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, January 18, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 17, 2004 Michael Feitelburg 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace Dear Mr. Feitelburg: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the February 3, 2004 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 3 FEBRUARY 2004 Dinklage said an approval of the berms tonight would not preclude any enforcement if it is found that there is a violation causing problems on neighboring lots. Mr. Belair explained that on the original plan only existing contours were shown. He said it would be impossible for a developer to show proposed grading of single family lots when they have no idea of the placement of a house, driveway, etc. He said he will look at the site when the snow is gone to see if there are any plan violations. Mr. Boucher said he was not sure he agreed. It seemed that materials got moved from one place on the site to another. Ms. Smichenko said they had no water in their backyard previous to this development but do have water now. Mr. Boucher said he wants to see a plan that reflects what will actually be on the site. He wanted to see any changes being made to the berms to address the grass swale issue, and he wanted assurance that there will be no trees/shrubs on the berms. Mr. Dinklage asked if the contours shown on the plan will be the final ones. Mr. Marshall said no. He agreed that the plan should reflect what is actually there. Mr. Kupferman moved to continue final plat application #SD-03-02 of JAM Golf until 2 March 2004. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. �ublic Hearing: Application # CU-03-20 of Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness for conditional use approval under Section 14.10 Conditional Use Review of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Request is for permission to allow as accessory uses to an existing indoor and outdoor recreational facility, the following uses: 1) short-order restaurant (snack bar), 2) personal service (hair salon), and 3) retail store (pro -shop), 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace: and (�"ite Plan Application #SP-03-51 of Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness to amend a previously approved 75,000 sq. ft. indoor recreational facility and outdoor recreational facility. The amendment consists of allowing as accessory uses the following uses: 1) short-order restaurant (snack bar), 2) personal service (hair salon), and 3) retail store (pro -shop), 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace: Mr. Dinklage noted the request is for "as -built" changes that were made without approval of the DRB. He cautioned the applicant that this should not happen again. Mr. Feitelberg agreed. Mr. Belair noted there are no changes in the size of the building or in membership of the Fitness center. Mr. Boucher moved to approve Application #CU-03-20 and Site Plan #SP-03-51 of Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Ms. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. - 3 - CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 February 9, 2004 Michael Feitelberg Burlington Indoor Tennis 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Site Plan Application #SP-03-51 and Conditional Use Application #CU-03-20 Dear Mr. Feitelberg: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on 2/3/04 (effective 2/5/04). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Encl. Certified Mail Return Receipt #: 7003 2260 0002 8773 4087 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: January 27, 2004 \drb\sit\twin_oaks_siteplan_&_conditional. doc Plans received: December 29, 2003 TWIN OAKS — 142 TWIN OAKS TERRACE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION #CU-03-20 SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-03-59 Agenda #5-6 Meeting date: February 3, 2004 Owner Applicant Burlington Indoor Tennis Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness 142 Twin Oaks Terrace 142 Twin Oaks Terrace S. Burlington, VT 05403 S. Burlington, VT 05403 PropertV Information Tax Parcel 0970-00095-C R7 District 5.52 Acres Location Map r` I r__f� T Odds 7e0e0 x r Subject Propertylop" .. law r lit Vol " Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting site plan and conditional use approval to amend a previously approved 75,000 square foot indoor recreational facility and outdoor recreational facility. The amendment consists of allowing as accessory uses the following uses: 1) short-order restaurant, 2) personal service, and 3) retail store, 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace. The subject property contains 5.52 acres and is located in the Residential 7 (R7) Zoning District. Associate Planner Brian Robertson and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, , referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on December 29, 2003 and have the following comments. Staff discovered that the proposed accessory uses currently exist without permits. Therefore, this application is to bring the property into compliance with the Land Development Regulations. ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Table 1. Dimensional Requirements R7 Zoning District=1 Required Proposed Min. Lot Size 40,000 SF 240,451 SF �l Max. Building Coverage 40% 25% Max. Total Coverage 60% 42% �1 Max. Front Yard Coverage 30% n/a Min. Front Setback 30 ft. n/a �l Min. Side Setback 10 ft. n/a Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. n/a J zoning compliance CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 14.10(E) of the Land Development Regulations the proposed conditional use shall meet the following standards: 1. The proposed use, in its location and operation, shall be consistent with the planned character of the area as defined by the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. The subject application is for "after the fact" approval for an existing indoor recreational facility to accommodate a short order restaurant, a personal service space, and a retail space. This indoor recreational facility is already in existence, and is consistent with the planned character of the area. 2 2. The proposed use shall conform to the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed use is located. According to Section 4.04 of the Land Development Regulations, the R7 Zoning District is formed to encourage high -density residential development. The district is located in areas that are near shopping areas, schools, and public transportation facilities and that are served by roads capable of carrying high traffic volumes. Offices and specified other commercial uses may be permitted within any district in locations that have direct access to arterial and collector streets and that will not adversely affect residential properties. The subject indoor recreational facility is already in existence. It has direct access to arterial and collector streets and does not adversely affect the surrounding residential properties. 3. The Development Review Board must find that the proposed uses will not adversely affect the following: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. Staff does not believe that the proposed project will adversely affect municipal services. (b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, or ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses. Staff believes that the proposal is in keeping with character of uses on surrounding properties and will not adversely affect the character of the area or the ability to develop adjacent properties. (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. The proposed project will not affect traffic in the vicinity. (d) Bylaws in effect. The proposed project is in keeping with applicable regulations. (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. The proposed project will not affect renewable energy resources. (0 General public health and welfare. The proposed project will not affect general public health and welfare. 3 SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The subject building is already in existence, so the transition form site to structure and from structure to structure is not applicable. The proposed project is an accessory use to the indoor recreational facility. Therefore, the parking requirement for the subject property will remain the same as the most recent approval. On July 18, 1998, the South Burlington Planning Commission approved the subject property with 126 parking spaces. This approval included a waiver for a 10 parking space (7.4%) shortfall. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The parking on the subject property is already in existence, so this requirement is not applicable. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The subject building is already in existence, so this requirement is not applicable. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The subject building is already in existence, so this requirement is not applicable. (f) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The subject building is already in existence, so this requirement is not applicable. 4 Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not feel it is necessary to require any additional access to abutting properties. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Staff has already stated that pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enc/osure(s). The plans submitted for the proposed project were last revised in 1987, so the current location of the dumpster in not depicted. However, the property does contain an adequate dumpster. (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements There is no additional landscaping and/or screening requirement resulting from he proposed project. Access/Circulation Access and circulation on the property will remain unchanged through the proposed project. Traffic Traffic will remain unchanged through the proposed project. Other 1. The plans shall be revised to depict all existing and proposed lighting on the subject property, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. In addition, the floodlight on the westerly side of the building and the pole -light at the northerly entrance to the property shall be tipped downwards, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 2. The plans shall be revised to depict a bicycle rack on the subject property, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 3. The plans shall be revised to depict the sidewalk on the westerly side of the subject property, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 4. The plans shall be revised to depict the dumpster on the property, adequately screened, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Conditional Use application #CU-03-20 and Site Plan application #SP-03-51, conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items in the "Comments" section of this document. Respectfully submitted, Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Copy to: Michael Feitelberg, Applicant 9 Permit Number SP- G J - 51 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #)_ VOL. IbY 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) -Tkrc_ QJ0.a_ 1 y z. Lift*--T ..., 0AU _ `- _V . S . 8 c, "'L ;.,�,,�.,. f,P 1 (16R,_ODn 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailin address, phone and fax #) c K%1 rt (6 q 7_ li..�c. ic- T.- - - O a7_ __ 1w . � - — 6 n_ i (ci 0, n 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 1 4 -L W ff Sr i 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 0g70-- 0ODQ 2� 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) dcC/OgMn cpU6y b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new u and e�j,�sting use to remain) SN,�.M �� / aC!U Y� �-E� cl otal buildl square footsg e on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) 'S/Oci(3 I�1Vt,2 cc,(/ r d&eight of building & number of if basement and mezzanine) 0 (proposed buildings and a fisting buildings to remain, specify r l ^ C0i>V '6n� 2 kloga ) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) 0 fj Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 1 3 g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE V 6 a) Building: Existing,_ o Proposed % b) Overall (building, Par , outside storage, etc) Existing-M.° Proposed % c) Front yard (along each stree xisting % Proposed% 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ b) Landscaping: $ 0 0 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): ry/A- 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out)- b) A.M. Peak hour for entire proper c) P.M. Peak hour for entire propert 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATIO: 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMP 14) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I V x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 2 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNAT E SI N URE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: V v� REVIEW AUTHORITY: evelopment Review Bard Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Comp, et Incomplete Directo f Planning & Zoning or Designee Date V EXHIBIT A SITE PLAN The following information must be shown on the plans. Please submit five (5) copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the plan. Failure to provide the following information will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. o Lot drawn to scale (20 feet scale if possible). o Survey data (distance and acreage). o Contours (existing and finished). o Proposed landscaping schedule (number, variety, and size) as r quired in Section 26.1105 of the Zoning Regulations. o Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, exist' g buildings, existing landscaping. o Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, walkways. o Zoning boundaries. o Number and location of parking spaces (as required t der Section 26.25 of the Zoning Regulations). o Number and location of handic ped spaces (as re ired under Section 26.253(a) of the Zoning Regulations). o Location of septic tanks (if applic le). . o Location of any easements. o Lot coverage information: Building f tprint, otal lot, and front yard. o North arrow. o Name of person or firm preparing site plan nd date. o Exterior lighting details (cut sheets). All 1' h should be down casting and shielded. o Dumpster locations (dumpsters must be s eene . o Bicycle rack as required under Section 2 .253(b) the Zoning Regulations. o If restaurant is proposed, provide numb of seats an square footage of floor area provided for patron use but not containing fixed sea . AP LICATION FEE ❑ Site Plan \$8 5.00* ❑ Amended Site Plan (DRB revie 5.00* ❑ Administrative Site Plan .00* *includes $10.00 recording fee CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 �- Permit Number APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing. Type of application check one: ( ) Appeal from decision of Administrator Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation) (W'1-quest for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance ( ) Other PROVISION OF ZONING ORDINANCE IN QUESTION (IF ANY) 4 WHAT ACTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING? -1) lO1(WNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, /maillii"ncgg address, phone _ and fax # iJ u WAdf'� '�'CA w n w - ! 4 1- `�., V 1�1.��. 6(I.d], . V . A. scat:. ' & aJ zzi,,- , L�CL-- -1 Gs -cym - 91�0-a2106 (:7,Ax 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Ooc-, I oaq arc Ll 17 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #)_ k (J 100 041CS S'ttgx a- (—'MvjrSS 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) V 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: ! y Z W tA::t,- j 0qIJ2, 1-,,6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office)o 91r1 o- ( 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing UsesonProperty (including description and size of each separate use) 4- ,(A , b) Proposed Uses c) Total building arty, (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) t eight of building & umber of floors oposed 1 an mezzanine) G�n on G� ^ and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain)__! f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and roposed, note office versus not n g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): V OT COVERAGE LMe a) Building: Existingt l _ % Proposed _Ad `S- b) Overall (building, parkin , outside storage, etc) Existing_ Proposed A- % yt tot)le c) Front yard (along each stre �Existing_% Proposed^% (does not apply to residential uses) 9 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations) $ b) Landscaping: $ Imo lhnv c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): A) Pr 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14) LIST ABUTTERS ( List names and addresses of all abutting property owners on a separate sheet of paper). I] I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF AE SIGNATURE -OF Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning & Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: O Complete ,) ❑ Incomplete & Zoning or Designee IM 0 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: January 27, 2004 \drb\sit\twin_oaks_siteplan_&_conditional.doc Plans received: December 29, 2003 TWIN OAKS — 142 TWIN OAKS TERRACE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION #CU-03-20 SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-03-59 Agenda #5-6 Meeting date: February 3, 2004 Owner Applicant Burlington Indoor Tennis Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness 142 Twin Oaks Terrace 142 Twin Oaks Terrace S. Burlington, VT 05403 S. Burlington, VT 05403 Location Map ff 1 PropertV Information Tax Parcel 0970-00095-C R7 District 5.52 Acres Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting site plan and conditional use approval to amend a previously approved 75,000 square foot indoor recreational facility and outdoor recreational facility. The amendment consists of allowing as accessory uses the following uses: 1) short-order restaurant, 2) personal service, and 3) retail store, 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace. The subject property contains 5.52 acres and is located in the Residential 7 (R7) Zoning District. Associate Planner Brian Robertson and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, , referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on December 29, 2003 and have the following comments. Staff discovered that the proposed accessory uses currently exist without permits. Therefore, this application is to bring the property into compliance with the Land Development Regulations. ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Table 1. Dimensional Requirements R7 Zoning District Min. Lot Size Required_ 40,000 SF Proposed 240,451 SF Max. BuildinQ Covera e 40% 25% Max. Total Coverage 60% 42% �l Max. Front Yard Cover -age 300/(o n/a Min. Front Setback 30 ft. n/a �l Min. Side Setback 10 ft. n/a �l Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. n/a �l zoning compliance CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 14 10(E) of the Land Development Regulations the proposed conditional use shall meet the following standards: 1. The proposed use, in its location and operation, shall be consistent with the planned character of the area as defined by the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. The subject application is for "after the fact' approval for an existing indoor recreational facility to accommodate a short order restaurant, a personal service space, and a retail space. This indoor recreational facility is already in existence, and is consistent with the planned character of the area. 2 2. The proposed use shall conform to the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed use is located. According to Section 4.04 of the Land Development Regulations, the R7 Zoning District is formed to encourage high -density residential development. The district is located in areas that are near shopping areas, schools, and public transportation facilities and that are served by roads capable of carrying high traffic volumes. Offices and specified other commercial uses may be permitted within any district in locations that have direct access to arterial and collector streets and that will not adversely affect residential properties. The subject indoor recreational facility is already in existence. It has direct access to arterial and collector streets and does not adversely affect the surrounding residential properties. 3. The Development Review Board must find that the proposed uses will not adversely affect the following: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. Staff does not believe that the proposed project will adversely affect municipal services. (b) The essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, or ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses. Staff believes that the proposal is in keeping with character of uses on surrounding properties and will not adversely affect the character of the area or the ability to develop adjacent properties. (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. The proposed project will not affect traffic in the vicinity. (d) Bylaws in effect. The proposed project is in keeping with applicable regulations. (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. The proposed project will not affect renewable energy resources. (t) General public health and welfare. The proposed project will not affect general public health and welfare. 3 SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Section 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications (a) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The subject building is already in existence, so the transition form site to structure and from structure to structure is not applicable. The proposed project is an accessory use to the indoor recreational facility. Therefore, the parking requirement for the subject property will remain the same as the most recent approval. On July 18, 1998, the South Burlington Planning Commission approved the subject property with 126 parking spaces. This approval included a waiver for a 10 parking space (7.4%) shortfall. (b) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The parking on the subject property is already in existence, so this requirement is not applicable. (c) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The subject building is already in existence, so this requirement is not applicable. (d) Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (e) The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The subject building is already in existence, so this requirement is not applicable (� Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain, and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The subject building is already in existence, so this requirement is not applicable. 0 Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: Site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in (a) The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff does not feel it is necessary to require any additional access to abutting properties. (b) Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Staff has already stated that pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. (c) All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans submitted for the proposed project were last revised in 1987, so the current location of the dumpster in not depicted. However, the property does contain an adequate dumpster. (d) Landscaping and Screening Requirements There is no additional landscaping and/or screening requirement resulting from he Proposed project. Access/Circulation Access and circulation on the property will remain unchanged through the proposed project. Traffic Traffic will remain unchanged through the proposed project. Other 1. The plans shall be revised to depict all existing and proposed lighting on the subject Property, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. In addition, the floodlight on the westerly side of the building and the pole -light at the northerly entrance to the property shall be tipped downwards, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 2. The plans shall be revised to depict a bicycle rack on the subject property, prior to 5 issuance of a zoning permit. 3. The plans shall be revised to depict the sidewalk on the westerly side of the subject Property, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 4. The plans shall be revised to depict the dumpster on the property, adequately screened, prior to issuance of a zoning permit. RECOMMENDA TION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Conditional Use application #CU-03-20 and Site Plan application #SP-03-51, conditional upon the applicant addressing the numbered items in the "Comments" section of this document. Respectfully submitted, r'1 �14- Brian Robertson, Associate Planner Copy to: Michael Feitelberg, Applicant , I i n . a_.._. .... _ _ _......__ ; IrAIK , I ANO+: 4 I c ;' ENNIS I - T f {{ i. 5 I _NY ITN CE ASTER ' �f Gr'M.�: : tL o 1at __�.-► � I °� � ......_--•---..T....j '` rY.;�X7r: F - � 1 � i • F•d----=--- -' � �' _ ,' s � si 1�. r,1y1,2:SR: r�''� i r-. 4 _ E /- i_--o'-ter'"" 'i° y t i':i. __ ..._.yc _ �_- ` i �•• l•-•-� * -: { ' ,,s "� � \ 1" .,.. + I ; � , � � �.l y.r �. f;Y /.:. /�/ /•� t3 17 ,' � ' i •T �_ _-z' .�1�—•y:"=^-•=a�'_'_Ti- i, �i ''•...= ,� i'_ _ - - _ .. _ •� � 1 � � i .'a j { , i • - : 1 i 4 ' . , • -- _ - -" FSt; G^- t ' � , i i c i1�Ir2:'Nx'.!r r fsr,•r.-% 7 G�%�?'Jr r�"' i- : { � 1 '. M r+;,;ti• � , � 1 i I i •� � n` tYIK/ ,:; (o-3 v .7 .. 'fir `• — a�• - - ., i � - - L Cl::••G --- .{".. i ! G. s`"` .. , :i iV , \ .. - i' ; r _— _ . ' ~•, { ;�-..�R � � "� -�� , ' ,I .i -.'� tx,'o �1 .� e ♦ `4,: � � 1�, i ,,T,�j,F+i FIGS-.. * Y A ' �o 17/c ja is " i 1 ,` � (. ! r _ !7 . , \ • � - �- + "�� - L.1.. -- - ��--- �'ritA j �>r 1 - .. z i { � � -, i - ��. �_ •, iX' h'r �-�"'-_. . � { { _ .. - i ' �; 1 i { � ' � . � , t d:Yr'T � Y�irf't.?.!•'�' { ` � r � � ` \` . � i• .,\ 1 � ,`,.1 3 S 1 1 i t '� ti �i ' 1} � t 9 • , � ; � 1�' � i 1 's v •�^ti:•' � _a: i ( i, �' �C., 'i�. 1. ; j �. �-- � .: `i i � '! 1; � ' ,J_..3� '_"i f _ i 'tp 4 r _ : ; , .'`i c, i, l i t ..`, , 1 �i { { , : { 1 i -_. 1.__ ; i 1 •' +'�,� t„" 1 :� ���:z 14 1 �. 1 Y � t�` � '�4` � '--- � ' �-1 i � ! i-.; . _ ....�. . � i _ <'� yE%Y:IIS GtYi.2?� 7 , s � j �;,�,,,,�._..�..---"--•- _""_-tr='"' `"/ =30' 1 �j A41 , � s � '�. ; , ;,'..' � � •; i ' {{ ' �, � G:: r G!"k''�' l:. � .r , - . _" ` �" - y ' ! lYL�s 7Z.�eTr': 0f• ,. l { � � � .. " � : � 't � _ � f `' f ' __ --- - _ -✓ - _ _ r. - - _ _ ... _ I j ,fl/,!iJN/i?�,!'% 7� yF ! � � _ _ i; i t1 � '�„t,`, �r, _..- -" ---•-... - _,_._-.... - I t �...•/ � rap >fi7.��?` � raI � I ►� > - _<,f_ ' ,...ram•= \\\ 1 t � �, ,. • • .4 .: � 4`,�-� ...... _ _. ^ - c. �..-, r,,.rt: �` , x. :.i f,. _ _ '" - . -_ \ ..., _.-.� �/re,/�7 f••si.Y r>- ,4 }r N•cOOj `��` .,`T 3, iit� % .���,..,.�a •F�";-::..�%! ;= ✓'i•'�•+%r•s;M'r/' .i' r. '•`�Z,, __' I YG.��^�+.- �.aiM>rcy�j,;;y;/.fiAFf 'T'FS"+t r' 2 � c.•rra ..� nay= --s••4 _ _ _ ,-; -_ ; - '• � w _ z _---_._._-_-- _.___.,___ 1 '_ _. � - CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Michael Feitelberg Twin Oaks Sports & Fitness 142 West Twin Oaks Terrace So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Health Club Snack Bar Dear Mr. Feitelberg: Enclosed, please find the site plan and conditional use applications submitted during the first week of August, 2003. These applications and the s65.00 check are being returned to you because they have been deemed incomplete. They are incomplete for the following reasons: 1.) The applications have not been signed by the property owner. 2.) The s65.00 check submitted is $255.00 short of the required $320.00 application fee for both applications. 3.) No site plan was submitted. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincefely, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEFARTME1\iT OF PLAN11,1UNTG & "60NU4CT 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAA (802) 846-4101 Permit Number lq� '011-L11#11- @ g NJ 3- TWIMOC) 111X, All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of hearing. Type of application check one: Appeal from decision of Administrator Officer (includes appeals from Notice of Violation) Request for a conditional use Request for a variance Other PROVISION OF ZONESTG ORDE",TANCE IN QUESTION (IF WHAT ACTION OF THE AD-MINISTRATIVE OFFICER ARE YOU APPEALING? 1) OWNER OF RECORD Z as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax ht) 9=4v% f- AS A 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) VIA go-dAc�C'v 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: V4L 6) TAX . PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's �Office) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain)_ c) Total building square footage On Property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) d) Height of building & number of foors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and pr9posed, note office versus non -office employees) g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing_ % Proposed % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing _% Proposed % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing % Proposed (does not apply to residential uses) '1 J I 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Elfilding (including interior renovations): $ b) Landscaping: $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): n 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT 'COMPLETION DATE: 1 4) LIST ABUTTERS ( List names and addresses of all abutting property owners on a separate sheet of paper). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my I'mowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPkTCANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below -this line A DATE OF SUBMISSION: i i� '::/ REVIEW AUTHORITY-. 1-3/Development Review Board ❑ Director, Planning& Zoning I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: 0 Complete 2/in complete Dii'ecta '02'Pfanning & Zoning or Designee bate F11 P/ CITYOF SOUTH EURTL1:,,,TGTT0-TN- DERAF VI�fT,CF PI—ANNUTG& ZOINING .575 DORSET STREET SOU"17-11 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 Permit Number SP--- APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Il information -requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the re-Aew before the Development Review Board. I", OW -VIER OF RECORD (Naine as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax 2 ) T .L10CATTON OF Lk-ST RECORDED DEED (-Book and page 44) 3) APPLTCANT (;*Tame, mailing address, phone and -fax#) 4) CO TACT PERSON (-f\T4!ne, mailing address, phone and fax 5" PROTJEC-7 STI REET ADDRESS: d "t t 6) TAX PARCEL TD 4 (can be obtained at Assessor's Office). 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) F—xistLng Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use), b) Proposed Uses on property (include dewri-ption and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) I L, t L c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain)_ d) Height ofibuilding & number of floors (proposed andme=anine) ­ J and emsthig buildings to remain, specify if basement Its (i appficabie, new units and exzistinaun' - rarnain e-) Number of residential units 11370 j- fi Number of employees & com#ny velliCleS (existing and proposed, -note office versus non -office employees' C 1 t� g) Wither (list a-miother, Lnlrmnarion er^mlent sa 'Es appiicamon net S;e cai2y r~quested above, please note _;60vesimy T-Dismicts are applicable): 3) LOT COVEIZAGE � .���a��� �::� OiNli a Building � .� svmg % Proposed b) O eraii (building, paeming, outside storage, etc) " stina % Ptoposed % c) From yard _(along each street) E,!dsting % Proposed % 9) COST ESTINIA TES a) Eazilding ( including interior renovations): b) Landscaping: c) Cther site mpmavements (please list with cost):. 10) EST = T� �C y- d..-m.�.".�.mar a) A:verage daily tmEHc for entire property (in.and out): b) A.i_VL Peak hour for and property (in. and -out). c) a.1 f/I Peak he ur for entire prorerty and. out): 11) PE:-A-I<-HOUR.S OP OPF-R . TION: 12) PEAK DAYS GP OPE 'PION: 1 32) ES7UV1 _= PROJECT COMPLI TI01`l DATE: 14) SITE PLAN AIND A site pian small be submitted which shows the inforMation listed ota Exhibit A att=hed. Pi,, e (5) -egaiiar siyr copies and one reduced copy (11" y 17) of the site plan must be gubmitted. A site plan application fee shall be ta:d to ii3e City at the time of Submitting the site pian appheation (see Exhibit A). 17 hereby certify 'hat all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my �mowiedge. SIGNATURLE, OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWINTER Do not vmite below this line DATE OF SUBMSSIO�T. )"z RE'VE Wi AUTHORITY /Development Review Board El Director, Planning & Zoning I have le"Viewed this site plan application and find it to be: ❑ Complete 2Incompiete fanning &.Zoning or Designe-- Dire-c'tor'of 1 bate :1 No Text trl p CITY OF SOUTH BURL[NGTON PERMIT NO ........... hPPLICATION FOR ZONING r RMIT lat. Copy CODE OFFICER 2nd. Copy CITY ENGINEER Zone .......... 3rd. Copy CITY ASSESSOR ( ��G 4th Copy APPLICANT Date ... l' L .1... ........................... I9 .. 1. o.. . The undersigned hereby applies for permission to rusks ca In building Improvems i as described below. (Plans to be submitted If required by Building Inspector.) All construction to be completed In accordance with the Zoning Laws and Building Regulations of the City of South Burlington and the State of Vermont, and con- form to the Regulations of the National Board of Fire Underwriters and any and all Federal Regulations now in effect. LOT SIZE: Frontage Depth Lot No. ®nn��OWNER 9U, , ®nn�� r ■ •■nn�SEWAGE DISPOSAL:■ �L�n■� ROAD OPENING: (Show layout) Permit * ELEC. WIRING: Underground El -Overhead r-1 Permit * ao©© Plot Mark 10 N scale Lot and Building at Compete point Indicating Improvements, North. showing width of Front, Side and Rear yards. �t��Mmm .............................................. NEE= ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■i■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■c �■I MDT �,IIEENM ■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ r• ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■i■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■..._.....■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■.■■■■ ..■.■..NSOMEN■.■■■■■l_■■■■■■■■ee■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ... .................... ........................ .................................■............ Wood Shingles Asbes. Shingles .■..■..■....■.......■.......■■ ................ Stucco on Frame...............■.....■...........WEEMEN.e.e■.N Stucco on Tile C C ...................■■....■.................... Brick Veneer Gas Burner Brick on Tile Solid 6 ............................................ Stone Veneer PLUMBING .............................................. Kitchen Sink Std. Wat. Heat ............................................. Remarks 0 Demolition 0 Utilities closed 0 '• r • r • , 1-0 SeQ • rr .... . , . ROOFING Asph. Shingles Bath Fl. & Wcot. Toll* Fl. �® FEE MP A 10��$ ��. aG n Plans receiivved Yes ❑ No ❑ I TURE of OWNER or BUILDER TAD R of OWNER �5 j�)"T IV'i osyo3 APPLIC O REJECTED ❑ APPROVED -c .D SIS,DJATIjRE OF CODE OFFICER ISSUED TO _ /s- Po'Zl S iT.t/-P SS Date 1 r� PERMIT VALID FOR SIX MONTHS PERMIT SUBJECT TO APPEAL WITHIN 15 DAYS FROM DATE ISSUED City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802) 658-4748 PLANNING (802)658-7955 October 22, 1998 Gregory A. Lord E. F. Wall & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 259 Barre, Vermont 05461 Re: Floor Area Expansion, 95 Kennedy Drive Dear Mr. Lord. - ZONING (802)658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the July 21, 1998 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Si cerely, Joe eith, Dir for of Planning & Zoning JW/mcp 1 Encl PLANNING COMMISSION 21 JULY 1998 3. The proiect as designed will result in a greater degree of nonconformance in terms of front yard coverage along Mary Street. The motion was seconded and Passed unanimously. 9. Sketch plan application of Homestead Design to amend a planned residential development consisting of 162 single family lots, 40 multi -family units (244 units total) and an 18 hole golf course. The amendment consists of 1) combining lots # l 10-117 into one lot containing eight duplex buildings, 2) combining lots #137-143 into one lot containing seven duplex buildings, and 3) creating 32 footprint lots for each unit in the duplex buildings, Dorset Street: The applicant explained that they are changing the form of ownership because it is easier to get bank financing this way. All land would become common land, with each duplex having its own footprint. There would be only one other proposed change and that would be to offer buyers the option to add a screened porch. The city would be given "as-builts" so they would know the location of these units. Mr. Weith said he would have to discuss this with the City Attorney. Members were concerned about some size limitation. Mr. Dinklage was concerned about a resident who might want to add a porch in 10 years. The applicant said that could be approved by the homeowners' association because it would be common land. Mr Dinklage said he would want them to come to the Commission because it would be increasing the lot line. He didn't want "nickel - diming." Mr. Weith noted that every survey plat must be signed by the Planning Commission. Mr. Dinklage felt this could be an administrative nightmare. Ms. Budd raised the question of the rec path. She noted the applicant wants to move the path from its approved location behind the homes to within the right-of-way in front of the homes. This issue will come back to the Commission. Members felt the proposal was generally acceptable but would have to have details worked out with the City Attorney. 10. Site plan application of Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc, to increase the size of the "squash court" building by 1370 sq. ft. at a previously approved indoor and outdoor recreational facility. The applicant proposes to convert two single floor squash courts to two floors of aerobic/exercise space, 95 Kennedy Drive: Mr. Morrow explained that when they first considered this change (which has already been done), they called City Hall and were told all they needed was a building permit which they got. Mr. Weith added that staff only found out about this later on. 9 PLANNING COMMISSION 21 JULY 1998 Mr. Morrow explained that they took out two squash courts and put in a second floor for aerobic space. Mr. Morrow then addressed the concerns raised by staff: One parking area has only 68 spaces instead of 70. The 24 car parking lot is not striped. That will be done this week. The re -aiming of the floodlight will be taken care of. The dumpster will be screened, but the applicant would prefer to use a wooden structure instead of wire. Three trees are no longer there. Mr. Morrow explained they are having a problem with trees dying in that area. They asked for time to find some option that will work. Mr. Morrow said the club has experienced no parking problems. It is open 18 hours a day, so business is spread out. Even in busy hours, there are no parking problems. They do no anticipate an increase in numbers of people because of the changes. The small size of the locker room dictates numbers. People are just being redistributed throughout the building. Mr. O'Rourke noted that more people can be put in an aerobics area than on a squash court. The applicant replied that there have been declines in numbers of people playing tennis and squash, but these people move to other areas of the club. Mr. O'Rourke moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Twin Oaks Kids & Fitness to amend a previously approved plan for an 11,000 square foot building for indoor recreation and day care use of 59 children. The amendment consists of increasing the number of children in the day care to 75.80 Farrell Street as depicted on a plan entitled "Kids & Fitness Twin Oaks 80 Farrell Street S. Burlington Vermont," prepared by Smith Alvarez Sienkiewycz Architects dated 7/7/94 last revised 8/1/97 with the following stipulations: 1 All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2 For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that increasing the number of children in the day care _ to 75 will generate 7.84 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 3 Any new exterior lighting or changes to existing exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures Any change to existing lights shall require approval of the City Planner prior to 10 PLANNING COMMISSION 21 JULY 1998 installation. The flood light on the easterly end of the building shall be tipped straight downward or replaced with a downcasting shielded fixture approved by the City Planner. The light fixture at the easterly entrance with the bare bulb shall be shielded as approved by the City Planner. These lighting changes shall be completed prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy/compliance. 4. Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission grants a four (4) space or 11.8% parking waiver. It is the Commission's opinion based on a parking count survey conducted by the applicant that 30 spaces will be adequate. 5. The plan shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the City Planner. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to permit issuance. a) The site plan shall be revised to provide a bike rack as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. 6. The portion of the parking lot at the east end of the building which is not striped shall be striped prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance. 7. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 8. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to increasing the number of children in the day care to 75. 9. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously. As there was no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned. Clerk South Burlington Planning Commission 11 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX (802)658-4748 PLANNING (802)658-7955 August 12, 1998 Gregory A. Lord E. F. Wall & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 259 Barre, Vermont 05641 Re: Floor Area Expansion, 95 Kennedy Drive Dear Mr. Lord: ZONING (802)658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact on the above referenced project approved by the Planning Commission on July 21, 1998 (effective 8/6/98). Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. J4j Weith, Cit Planner JW/mcp 2 Encls (_:it" of youth Burl._ .ton 375 DORSET STREE- 30,j7-+ BURLINGTON, VERtvjCN- =ax 558-4748 D�_,-1NNER i Z58- "35 5 July 17, 1998 Gregory A. Lord E.F. Wall & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 259 Barre, Vermont 05641 Re: Floor Area Expansion, 95 Kennedy Drive Dear Mr. Lord: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, July 21, 1998 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, 1 lecl- Joe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp Encls ' MOTION OF APPROVAL BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER, INC. I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc. to increase the size of the "squash court" building by 1370 square feet at a previously approved indoor and outdoor recreational facility. The applicant proposes to convert two (2) single floor squash courts to two (2) floors of aerobic/exercise space, 95 Kennedy Drive, as depicted on a plan entitled, "Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc. D.B.A. Twin Oaks Tennis Center Kennedy Drive, S. Burlington, VT" prepared by Peter Bergh Associates, last revised on 7/9/98, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The plan shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval by the City Planner. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plan shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to permit issuance: a) The plan shall be revised to accurately reflect the "as -built" parking layout of the northeast parking lot. 3. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the additional square footage will generate 5.89 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 4. Any new exterior lighting shall consists of downcasting shielded fixtures. Any change to existing lights shall require approval of the City Planner prior to installation. The applicant shall adjust the building mounted floodlight at the westerly entrance so it is aimed straight down. 5. Pursuant to Section 26.105(a)ofthe zoning regulations, the Planning Commission grants a $5100 credit for existing landscaping. The three (3) Pin Oak trees which have died along Twin Oaks Terrace shall be replaced with trees having a minimum caliper of 2 '/2 - 3". 6. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $5100 landscaping bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the new landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving and that the existing landscaping for which a credit is being given continues to live. 7. Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission grants a 10 space or 7.4% reduction in required parking. 8. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 9. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to the use of the additional floor space. 10. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission 2 Memorandum - Planning July 21, 1998 agenda items July 17, 1998 Page 10 10) BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER. INC. - INCREASE FLOOR SPACE - SITE PLAN This project consists of increasing the size of the "squash court" building by 1370 square feet by at a previously approved indoor and outdoor recreational facility. The applicant proposes the convert two (2) single floor squash courts to two (2) floors of aerobic/exercise space This property was last reviewed by the Commission on 10/9/84 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 95 Kennedy Drive lies within the R7 District. It is bounded on the north and east by Twin Oaks Terrace, and on the south and west by residences. Access/circulation: Access is provided by two (2) curb cuts, one (1) on Twin Oaks Terrace and one (1) on Twin Oaks Drive. No changes proposed. Circulation on the site is acceptable. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 25% (maximum allowed is 25%). Overall coverage is 42% (maximum allowed is 60%). Front yard coverage information was not provided. Front yard coverage will not be affected by this application. The existing tennis court building does not meet the front yard setback requirement. This building is a noncomplying structure subject to Section 26.002 of the zoning regulations. Parking: A total of 136 spaces are required and 126 spaces are available including two (2) bike racks. The additional floor space requires 11 additional spaces and no additional spaces are proposed. This is a 10 space or 7.4% shortfall. The applicant should be prepared to justify this parking shortfall. The site plan does not accurately reflect the "as -built" parking layout of the northeast parking lot. There are no spaces along the easterly boundary and there are 68 spaces not 70 in the lot. The plan should be revised to accurately depict the parking lot layout and show the handicapped spaces. The 24 space parking lot at the southwestern corner of the property should be striped prior to occupancy of the added space. Sewer: No additional sewer allocation needed. 10 Memorandum - Planning July 21, 1998 agenda items July 17, 1998 Page 11 Traffic: ITE estimates that the additional square footage will generate 5.89 additional vehicle trip ends (vte's) during the P.M. peak hour. The applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is zero (0). Lighting All existing exterior lighting is downcasting and shielded with the exception of a building mounted floodlight at the westerly entrance. The applicant has indicated that this light can be adjusted to aim straight down. Dumpster: A screened dumpster storage area will be provided. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $5100 which is not being met. The site is well landscaped with no space for additional landscaping. Staff supports granting a credit. Three (3) Pin Oak trees which were required as part of the last review which are located along Twin Oaks Terrace have been removed. These trees should be replaced. 11 -311 .,� 1 iV10,01-1 77V//Y 44AK 4cN4,GM/N/UM 1 1 \ \ M. I � l I � I 1 � ! 7-WI,V OA/Yf 7-,--flR,9 , - 1604. WOW r' :ju'r��','/ 'I"jZ,�p '�. , � (' / \,:J t s1'lD..Iga.c..F'�..•.. -.. •a i � I I► i I I ----'-- • �• i• �= :� ifs � - - •• � I 1 ► .: r2� — 1 . r 61m pok 77 ic i 11i- 4 roqT POR , I 771W - I _ _ ' � _ //v000e 1 I .vis i4>f . 1 �O /. 2' \ 90,• it -a'. sew" iro' �A_ 1 Nl �\\�a\\ ! I --1 - - -•- ---j - i VAV11� V ' Q L 5X. a "5.4• t. e. . 4'..•. , \1\ \\ • I , I x ! E JUL 1 Q 199$ ',`�,�;�\,�\; µ,i ' - '� ; ' oar,�e, of -So. burlin t ". apt \\\\\�������� y• \\ ` •�•__.......�..w -- _r!/�— _l'•- '• •� '4: �' ..>;.d ww'. +2 �r �� �.! � - ^� _ _ �' ` �` � 1 _ � / ... 1•VYr!CIp ... .. _ \, 1 l' � 316 Mz .'k e, -Wt F_ fi •1;. ,i/_. 'N a, ' OAJM� A"D' j FMNEI CE !. 'AT _IR, -PLAN `1=r�Tf'tJgE�=ACUft� /aasllt-� lmtil�rTbtlSlslU -/O Lzq/i �� �Xf.ST/NCB TlC " AV /7 .. SG ' Al;' IV0725 O`a 4VW MMM6-LdT -,-7XW-d Td Tn GEC c vTL.l�BASi�15 (tea). 7a7-.4L AGeEiE%lrE S, 5'2 AC eES=24A4s( ' f�l/![1tA►'1r �4i e�0�G `s$icsu".- '' �z P�aCCO✓� GUR=Ltg/FE' . Np�7sc° 17% " Flzc+> 711t. S 6 LOvwt , FavR[7 flw vp' CC,r1.6L"w TAUT 6U.Ft/,^rYir�►V/� p ; I X1 rof 87 Or - graphic scale. - type of, location, and size of existing and proposed utilities. - location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. - all applicable information required for a site plan, as provided in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, shall be submitted for subdivision involving a commercial or industrial complex, multi -family project, planned unit development, or planned residential development. (i.e. coverages, landscaping, etc.) - please be advised that condition 921 of the June 18, 1996 approval requires that the recreation path be constructed prior to occupancy the first residence. L & M PARTNERSHIP- ADD 7 LOTS - REVISED FINAL PLAT - the revised survey plat showing the new lots must be submitted by July 10, 1998 - common land lots should be numbered - the additional sewer allocation request should be submitted - the plans should show the limits of the developable and restricted areas as shown on the SEQ zoning map. - the C.O. District buffer associated with the wetlands should be shown - the plans should show the boundaries of the Dorset Park Scenic View Protection Overlay District. - submit information on the maximum height allowed on each of the new lots. This will need to be recorded in the land records - pole lights proposed would be 22.5 feet in height including the base, the maximum allowed is 20 feet. - a revised landscaping plan for the entire development should be submitted showing "as - built" and proposed landscaping. -since the Recreation Path Committee is no longer recommending that the path be constructed by this developer, there should no longer be a $300 credit/lot applied to the recreation impact fee. - staff recommends that no permits for the seven (7) lots be issued until Dorey Rd. is constructed. BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER, INC. - INCREASE FLOOR SPACE - SITE PLAN -!plan should be revised to accurately reflect existing site conditions and parking lot layout 1provide details (cut -sheets) for all existing and proposed exterior lights and show locations on plan the dumpster storage area should be shown and the dumpster screened /the 24 car parking lot should be striped -4rovide the existing and proposed gross square footage of just the building that contains the squash courts (excluding the tennis court building) --a bike rack should be provided as required by Section 26.253 (b) of the zoning regulations. ,/plan should show the paved walkway to the 24 car parking lot the floodlight on the building at the westerly building entrance should be pointed straight down or removed. ✓staff estimates that 195 parking spaces are required and 126 spaces are available (these numbers may change once the existing and proposed gross square footage numbers are provided). Applicant should be prepared to justify the parking shortfall. TWIN OAKS SPORTS & FITNESS TWIN OAKS KIDS & FITNESS_ July 13, 1998 Mr. Ray Belair Zoning and Planning Department City of South Burlington Dorset Street S. Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Site Plan Review Application, Requested Additional Information, Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc., d/b/a Twin Oaks Sports and Fitness, 95 Kennedy Drive Dear Ray: We are responding to your letter to E.F. Wall dated July 7, 1998 requesting additional site -related information. 1) Enclosed is an updated site plan (revised date 7/9/98) showing existing site conditions and parking lot layout. 2) Site lighting is now shown. The 24 car parking area has two shoe -box type downlit fixtures with concealed light source beyond illumination area mounted on 16' poles. The 70 car parking area has two adjustable head 24' pole mounted downlit fixtures. 3) Dumpster area is shown with proposed chain -link fence. Fencing shall be green vinyl fabric and solid green vinyl slat screening. 4) Parking lot restriping is scheduled for completion by the end of July, including the 24 car parking lot. 5) The gross floor area of the "squash court" building as defined in section 28.120 before and after the squash court conversion is: Before Floor 1 (90 x 102) 9,180 Floor 2 (90 x 102 less 4 crts) 6,440 Total square footage 15,620 After Floor 1 9,180 Floor 2 (90 x 102 less 2 crts) 7,810 Total square footage 16,990 Total Increase 1,370 658-0001 95 Kennedy Drive 658-0002 75 Farrell Street 658-0080 80 Farrell Street South Burlington, Vermont05403 fax: (802) 860-0206 www.twin-oaks.com 6) Existing bike racks are shown on the revised site plan. 7) Paved walkway is shown on the revised site plan. 8) The floodlight on the westerly side of the building is the only illumination for the 34 car parking lot and can be adjusted to aim straight down. 9) Existing parking of 126 spaces has historically been sufficient to support usage patterns of the facility. Internal usage reports indicate that an average of 80- 90 individuals utilize the facility during peak hours (5-6 pm) along with a maximum of 12-15 staff vehicles. Overall member utilization of the club is consistently well distributed over our operating hours, 5:30 am to 11:00 pm, and parking has never been a problem. It appears that existing parking is adequate for this use. I hope this information proves helpful in review of this application. Please call me at (802) 658-0001 with questions. incere yours, rJDpbell rGnage z51 City of South Burlingcun 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT';5-IC3 FAX 658-4748 -1! .ANNER 58- 7355 July 7, 1998 Gregory A. Lord E.F. Wall & Assoc. Inc. PO Box 259 Barre, VT. 05641 RE: Floor Area Expansion Dear Mr- Lord: Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer, William Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Friday, July 10, 1998. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincer, R modd J. Belair, Y Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: July 21, 1998 Agenda Items Date: July 2,1998 WESSEL - 4 LOT SUBDIVISION - VAN SICKLEN ROAD 1. The proposed road has an elevation drop of about 10 feet. A gravity sewer line would eliminate each house having to pump, install septic tanks and separate force mains. This should be looked into. 2. The four lot subdivision should have fire protection. 3. Street will be private. Maintenance including snow plowing shall be the responsibility of the four lot owners. 4. The pumping stations alarms shall be lights only. No horns as plans show. INVERNESS AT THE HIGHLAND - GOLF COURSE DEVELOPMENT Lot of units 110A and 110B at intersection of Golf Course Road and Park Road should have a 20' x 20' triangle easement for sight view purposes. TWIN OAKS TENNIS CENTER - TWIN OAKS DRIVE Site plan prepared by Peter Bergh Associates received June 22, 1998 is acceptable. GIGABYTES - WILLISTON ROAD The Williston Road r.o.w. line is the edge of the sidewalk not 4 feet beyond as plan shows. This should be checked. (Prelmb.mcp.wpd) MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: July 21, 1998 agenda items Date: July 2, 1998 1) William Wessel Dated 6/16/98 250 Van Sicklen Road Two (2) hydrants should be added as sketched on sheet C-2 and the 2" water line should be changed to an 8" line to serve the hydrants. 2) Bret Kernoff 1203 Williston Road Sprinkler and fire alarms are mandatory 3) Twin Oaks Tennis & Fitness Center 95 Kennedy Drive Acceptable 4) Homestead Design Golf Course Road Acceptable 5) L&M Partnership Pinnacle at Spear Acceptable (Memfire.mcp.wp) Dated 6/26/98 Dated 6/22/98 Dated 6/29/98 Dated 6/26/98 I -WO � 6;O-Q P67E (-/- � Ild hO 14 E. F. WALL & ASSOC., INC. June 22, 1998 Mr. Ray Belair Zoning and Planning Department City of South Burlington Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Site Plan Review Application, Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc., d/b/a Twin Oaks Racquet and Fitness, 95 Kennedy Drive Dear Paa&Ray: On behalf of the applicant, I would like to acknowledge receipt of your June 15, 1998 letter stating that site plan approval for the conversion of 2 squash courts into additional second floor studio space is required under section 26.10 of city zoning ordinance. Enclosed is a completed application, site plans and attendant fee of $50. It is our request that the proposed application be reviewed and approved by the City Planner without Planning Commission review as allowed under 26.10. This should be possible as: a) there are no exterior changes to the property including modifications to building or lot coverage and b) the modification does not result in an increase of more than 10% or 5,000 square feet in gross floor area (total additional square feet resulting from this project is +/- 1,370sf of second floor area, total existing sf footprint for facility is 59,630sf). Please note that the proposed work, namely conversion of two squash courts into two stories for increased aerobic activity studios, is nearly complete and that building permits were obtained before commencement of construction from the City of South Burlington and the Vermont Department of Labor and Industry. Thank you for your attention to this application. Please call me at (802) 479-1013 if I can be of further service. Sincerely, -e Gregory A. Lord Business Development Manager cc Twin Oaks Home Office Regional Office ,Ep ONE P.O. Box 259 P.O. Box 931 A c Barre, VT 05641 Manchester Village, VT 05254 . roF 802479-1013 802-362-3542 SYSTEMS BUILDERS to �., �MEM�`' wnmrcT ASS?q_ION •o,.,,., FAX 802-479-1019 FAX 802-362-2993 YJ�N'D`,""�ylk�.S6.1��.,�1ky1/�_iwMhby",'������^ � r ' um #-ZYON .;/& IWO&I %Lf - -a_7.7 az /Wr1w 2_4 /X�w 0 +1 i� s04 Ij AI- LL. _4p '4( t i _ II I —� 1 I —i _T . .......... O"Or it NZ Ll l V 472i 'k two -oS p0 !rlyola /V//fLz 9661 Z Z NnP "/7/ VII+V,7 tic - Nor, 4 JUN 22 '98 08:57 CITY OF S BURLINGTON P.1/4 l CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Planning Commission, 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on. deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) I_) I I_ 'r f / 1 _ CJo -TLJ Cr,�6c---3 k aOC4 l joss 91 .i cl �i <<-� �� i� L`� �+ �I(w�rt C�S�`—Gcr�l t:Z� Ua_k 2) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) aVVE 3) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) vvx4 (4l to t-'re V 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: � ,�) P`4 . t�c-Li Ot L t.—_ 5) TAX MAP NUMBER (can be obtained at Assessor's Once) 6) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property including description and size of each separate use) b) Proposed Uses (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) c) Total building square footage (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) L.- �i d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) iav-,, iu `i!-_ .t�bl OVA ac r_ k i t f C. -, 'l� F w- _ 4'' _ �a ek II C.x MA-� E x.t.e -Fe r vl /io�l �(,Mxt.l —' I 3 7�, � be- cu�cj, q (rid Cfivt U rtcw� d�- c l9 Sln cu'r vU� �o •� e) Number of residential units (iiapplicable, new units and existing units to remain)�T�o+, f) Number of employees (existing and proposed): �5 Er t 5 ITT #_1 -4—.t-ir Fax Note 7671 oace + �► To Z CAJI From / Go.loept. Co. Phone N Phone M Fax Y !� r7 Fax M JUN 22 '98 08:58 CiTY OF S 3 RLINGTON P.2/4 9) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically c+equested , above): itwj _ f' vT T' 7) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing I s % Proposed 21 % b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing J;i— % Proposed y Z c) Front yard (along each street) E)dsting Vo c1t, % Proposed _�, % 8) COST ESTIMATES a) Building: $ ' 22; �< b) Landscaping: $ c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): 9) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic (in and out): f'! b) A.M. Peak hour (in and out): 100 c) P.M. Peak hour (in and out): too 10) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: ; 36 Aw 11 FM 11) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: S - 12) ESTMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: A4, (9 `i 8 13) SITE PLAN AND FEE - A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). JUN ?S '98 08:59 CIT`r' QF S BURL-INGTGN R -2- 4 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIG "�UOF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 614 REVIEW AUTHORITY: Planning Commission 13 City Planner I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete 0 Incomplete City Planner or Designee Date (Apfrmsp) PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBFR 9, 1y84 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, October 9, 1984 at 7:30 pm in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present Sidney Poger, Chairman; John Dooley, Mary -Barbara Maher, Teter Jacob, Judy Hurd, John Belter, William Burgess Others Present Jane Bechtel, Planner; Peter Bergh, Irwin Wallman, Ira Tate, William Bissonette, Keith Keltner, Brian Mitchell, The other Paper Minutes of September 25, 1984 The September 25, 1984 minutes were approved on a motion by Mr. Burgess a second by Mr. Dooley and a unanimous vote. Consider revised site plan application of Peter Bergh for Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc., for the construction of an 8500 sq. ft. sports center and nursery located on Twin Oaks Terrace Mr. Poger noted that there had been an exchange of letters between the fire chief and Mr. Bergh. Mr. Bergh said he had met with the fire chief several times and worked out their differences. One issue left uncertain is the capacity of the existing ventilating fans. The chief wants to be sure they are enough to clear the building of smoke in the event of a fire and is waiting for an engineer's report on that. ilr. Poger asked what would happen if the opinion was that they were not adequate and was told they would have to work it out with the chief - perhaps louvers could be added to the ends of the building. Mr. Burgess wanted to know what the chief felt was adequate but Ms. Bechtel said he did not know the numbers. That is why he wants another opinion on it, to be sure the fans are sufficient. It was noted that the building would have two stories. Mr. Bergh asked about the 6 month expiration date on the approval, given that they cannot start until sewer capacity is available and was told that an extension could be requested later. Mr. Dooley moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Peter Bergh for Burlington Indoor Tennis, Inc., for the construction of a 8500 sq. ft. fitness center and nursery as depicted on a lan entitled "Twin Oaks Tennis and Fitness Center Master Plan" as prepared by Peter Bergh Associates, Shelburne, Vermont and latest revision dated 9 18 84 with the following stipulations: 1. A fire alarm system will be installed at the applicant's expense to connect the existing building and the new building to the fire department. 2. A hose station will be installed at a location determined in consultation_ with the South Burlington Fire Chief. 3. That the South Burlington Fire Chief determine, based on an opinion of an architect or an engineer supplied by the applicant, that the ventilating system is adequate to remove smoke from the building if reauired. PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 9, 1984 4. A landscaping bond in the amount of $5000 shall be posted rp for to permit. 5. Credit for existing v egetation is granted at $3000. 6. A sewer allocation of 900 gallons per day for the fitness center be made in accordance with the South Burlington Sewer Policy. 7. A_ drainage plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for his approval prior to permit. 8. Sidewalks shall be continuous across driveways at grade of existi g_ driveway. 9. The height shall not exceed 35 feet. 10. This approval expires in 6 months. Mrs. Maher seconded the motion and all voted aye. Continue discussion of revised landscaping plan of Irwin Wallman for Shelburne Plastics, Lot #4, Harbor View Road Ms. Bechtel said that Dr. Leonard Perry of the UVM Extension Service had gone to the site to do an evaluation of the existing vegetation. His valuation came in at almost $4000. New proposed landscaping will cost $1600, so Mr. Wallman is about $400 short. Dr. Perry made some suggestions for improvements. Mr. Wallman said the suggestion about landscaping around the transformer was fine, except that Green Mountain Power wanted access to it. He added that he had planned to only put in plantings up to the right of way, because other lots in the area had done that, and that would establish a tree line. He did not want his plantings forward of that tree line. The transformer is in front of the tree line. Mr. Jacob arrived at this time. Mr. Poger felt the lot needed more landscaping and he said there was a transformer on UVM property which had plantings right up to it. He also felt that if some of the trees on the lot were not in good condition, and Mr. Wallman was going to receive credit for them, he should bond for them the same way new plantings are. If the existing trees die and leave a gap, Mr. Poger wanted to be sure they were replaced. Mrs. Hurd came in at this point. Mr. Dooley felt that the applicant did not really have a landscaping plan to show the Commission. He was concerned about the informality of this. Ms. Bechtel said that if the Commission wanted more trees planted, the applicant could return, or she could approve the plan. The Commission has to decide if it wants to grant credit for the existing trees. Mr. Burgess said he would accept Dr. Perry's valuation if a landscaping plan making up the full dollar amount were presented and if the Commission could be sure that what they were giving credit for would be replaced by something of equal value if it died. Mr. Poger said the Commission asked for a bond to be sure the trees lasted 3 years. He said the Commission wanted a landscaping plan, but Mr. Jacob felt it would be fine if the Planner approved it. Mr. Dooley said that in future he would like to see landscaping plans that included all the landscaping that was proposed, rather than a plan that left a gap. 10/9/84 �JSB MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Peter Bergh for Burlington Indoor Tennis, Inc., for the construction of a 8500 square foot fitness center and nursery as depicted on a plan entitled "Twin Oaks Tennis and Fitness Center Master Plan" as prepared by Peter Bergh Associates, Shelburne, Vermont and latest revision dated 9/18/84 with the following stip Al tions: 1) A fire alarm system will be installed at the applicant's expense to connect the existing building and the new building to the fire department. 2) A hose station will be installed at a location determined in consulation with the South Burlington Fire Chief. .W G 3) The applicant shall provide verification from an architect or an engineer that the ventilating system is adequate to remove smoke from the building if required. 4) A landscaping bond in the amount of $5000 shall be posted prior to permit. 5) Credit for existing vegetation is granted at $3000. 6) A sewer allocation of 900 gallons per day for the fitness center be made in accordance with the South Burlington Sewer Policy. 7) A drainage plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for his approval prior to permit. 8) Sidewalks shall be continuous across driveways at grade of existing drive- way. 9) The height will not exceed 35 feet. 10) This approval expires in 6 months. University of Vermont Extension Service Plant and Soil Science Department College of Agriculture Hills Building Burlington, Vermont 05405-0082 Phone 802-656-2630 October 8, 1984 Ms. Jane Bechtel City Planning City Office S. Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Jane: Below are my estimated values of the existing plant materials you asked me to examine at Twin Oaks. I have used the formula of the International Society of Arboriculture which multiplies a tree value ($15/sq in trunk diameter at 4 1/2 feet) by a factor for kind of tree and location, and then by a factor for tree condition. The value per tree is then multiplied by number of trees in that planting of that kind. Sugar Maple (front): $424 x 1 x 1 =$424 x 18 = $7632 Sugar Maple (east): 424 x 1 x .8 =$339 x 7= $2374 Sugar Maple (back): 753 x 1 x 1 =$753 x 3= $2259 Sugar Maple (east): 188 x .6 x .2 =$22 Pin Oak (street): 424 x .8 x 1 =$339 x 5= $1696 White Pine (back): 1178 x 1 x .8 =$942 x 4= $3769 This gives a total of $17,752. For the west corner and side, I estimate a value of. $13,805. If you would like a break down by plant species, I have it. I hope this information is of help. Sincerely, ��W�0�7 Leonard P. Perry Ext. Ornamental Horticulturist Helping you put knowledge to work. University of Vermont Extension Service and U.S. Department of Agriculture cooperating, provide equal program and employment opportunities to all. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner Re: October 9 Agenda Items Date: 10/5/84 2) BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER, TWIN OAKS TERRACE Fire Chief Jim Godette and Peter Bergh have resolved the major fire protection issues. Mr. Bergh has agreed to have a fire alarm system connected to the fire department and a hose station connection. The four exhaust fans were deemed adequate. The fire department will consult with the applicant to determine the best location of the hose station. The revised plan shows one 8500 square foot building for the squash court, pro shop, sports science center and nursery. Thirty four new parking spaces are proposed. Circulation is adequate with twenty foot aisles. The total landscaping requirement is $8000. The applicant proposes $5000 in new landscaping; a credit of $3000 for existing landscaping is requested. The proposed plan will require 900 gallons per day of additional sewage capacity and will be on the waiting list. 3) IRWIN WALLMAN, SHELBURE PLASTICS, LANDSCAPING PLAN Dr. Leonard Perry, from the UVM Natural Resources Department, has completed his assessment of the value of existing landscaping on the Harbor View Road lot. The calculations include factors such as the quality, condition and type of the trees, and the benefit to the lot. He has verified a value of $3994. (see letter) New proposed landscaping has a value of $1600 - 1800. Therefore the existing and proposed landscaping is valued at $200 - 400 less than required. Dr Perry and I do feel that although the existing trees successfully block the view of the tractor -trailer trucks and of some of the building, several improvements could be made. The transformer could be shielded, and the front yard could be filled in since several trees are blighted and infested and may eventually be lost. New trees along the building on the road side would fill in for these if and when they die. The small white pine that are along the eastern property line are either right on the line, or are on the other lot. Dr. Perry be- lieves they may survive the winter and do better next year. A motion is in order to approve the plan for new landscaping at a value of $1600, and to grant a $4000 credit for existing landscaping. M E M O R A N D U M TO: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: William J. Szymanski RE: Next Week Agenda's Items DATE: October 5, 1984 Al French Fries Expansion Williston Rd. 1. The new driveway is on a private street. The owner will have to agree to the change. 2. Method of handling storm water from expanded parking lot must be shown. Pet Lodge Williston Rd. No comments Burlington Inddor Tennis Ctr. 1. Parking lot shows 3 catch basins, the discharge should be shown. 2. Sewer contribution is estimated at 900 g.p.d. using state estimates. 3. Comments on memo of 9-7-84 still apply. PETER BERGH AND ASSOCIATES, INC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE • SITE PLANNING • PLANNING • SHELBURNE. VERMONT 05482 • (802) 425-2433 September 21, 1984 Chief Goddette South Burlington Fire Department South Burlington, VT 05401 RE: Twin Oaks Expansion site plan Dear Chief Goddette: Enclosed is a copy of the site plan as revised and dated September 18, 1984 that we reviewed in your office. Thank you for your helpful input, and be advised that we will comply with the following recommendations you have made: 1) Twin Oaks Tennis Center (Twin Oaks) will install a fire alarm system connected to the fire department in the proposed addition as well as in the existing tennis building at the time of construction of the new addition. 2) Twin Oaks will install a hose standpipe for quick hook-up to your fire equipment at a location suitable to your needs as well as ours. 3) Twin Oaks feels that the exhaust fans (4) that are presently installed on the roof of the existing tennis building are adequate to ventilate the existing building of smoke should a fire occur. 4) Twin Oaks feels that the site plan submitted herewith and which will be presented to the Planning Commission on October 9t'n adequately meets the needs of all concerned. We certainly recognize the need for fire protection and feel that this plan gives adequate access to the building. We also have the need to provide adequate parking for our customers with convenient access to the building. In addition, good interior circulation is critical to our operation as a sports center, and we want to make the building and our grounds as attractive as possible with adequate area for landscaping. This plan is our best effort to meet the requirements of the fire department, the zoning board, the city planner and the planning commission as well as our need to have a building and grounds that allows us to conduct our business well by best serving the many needs of our clients. Chief Goddette p.2, 9/21/84 I trust that this plan and what I have agreed to do in this letter will allow you to give your approval to this project. However, if you have further reservations I request that you plan to attend the planning commission hearing on October 9th in person so that we can resolve them at that time as we wish to proceed with this project as soon as possible. Again, thank you for your assistance and willingness to work toward a solution that will work for everyone concerned. encl. cc. Sidney Poger,Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission Jane Bechtel, City Planner Matthew Katz, Esquire October 12, 1984 Peter Bergh RD 4 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Dear Peter: Enclosed are the minutes from the Planning Commission meeting at which your Site Plan application was approved. As you know, your project is on the sewer waiting list. You must apply for your building permit within 6 months, or request an extention within that time if capacity is not available. I am also en- closing the sewer policy for your information. Also, be sure to submit a drainage plan to Bill Szymanski for his approval. I will send you the Findings of. Fact under separate cover. Please call me if you have any questions. S incerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg 2 Encls PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 October 5, 1984 Mr. Sidney Poger South Burlington Planning Commission City Hall 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Poger: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 I have reviewed the revised plan for Twin Oaks Tennis and have met with Peter Bergh regarding these. If the applicant agrees to the motion of approval and the contents of his letter of September 21, 19841* I have no problems with this addition, with the exception of the exhaust fans as indicated in the motion of approval. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, �' �� X ri(aZ Goddette, Fire Chief JG/mcg October 5, 1984 Mr. Sidney Poger South Burlington Planning Commission City Hall 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Poger: I have reviewed the revised plan for Twin Oaks Tennis and have met with Peter Bergh regarding these. If the applicant agrees to the motion of approval and the contents of his letter of September 21, 1984. I have no problems with this addition, with the exception of the exhaust fans as indicated in the motion of approval. Please call me if you have any questions Sincerely, James Goddette, Fire Chief JG/mcg .43 t 1 TW V Y ►Sae d J O� niz Mr. Doolev then moved that the Pl.annin PLANNING COMMISSION September 11, 1984 page 2 ommission recommend to the City Council that it re-examine Section y of tine bi n Ordinance and further recommends that it loosen the restrictions on signs allowed or valid commercial uses in rest en is areas to something more reasonable Sor multi -occupant commercial uses. Mrs. Maher seconded and the motion passed 4-2 with Messrs. Poger and Burgess voting against. Consider request to cha orset btree ning on Dorset Street from R-4 to Ms. Bechtel advised that the request had been made since nearly all the present uses in the adjacent properties were commercial (e.g. a beauty shop, a real estate office, the Girl Scouts, etc). Mr. Poger asked what might be allowed in a C-1 zone that might be incompatible with a residential zone. Ms. Bechtel read the list from Sect. 11 of the Zoning Ordinance, and Mr. Poger re- sponded by noting that the Commission has been trying to provide a transitional area in that location so that it would look residential. He said he would rather an applicant came in with compatible uses; otherwise there would be commercial traffic butting into a residential neighborhood. Mr. Burgess shared Mr. Poger's view. Mr. Poger suggested a "transitional zone" might be created which would allow for businesses in houses. Since Mr. Jacob, who had made the request, was involved in the vote counting, the item was moved to the bottom of the agenda in case he arrived later in the meeting. Consider site plan application of ifeter Bergh Burlington Indoor Tennis Center for construction of a 7200 square foot s ors facility addition and a 1100 square foot nursery located at Twin Oaks Tennis, 95 Kennedy Drive. Mr. Bergh explained that the new facility would include a pro shop, squash courts, and a sports science facility. There would also be additional parking for 30 cars. The building would be 1 story high. Zoning Board permission has been received. They were requesting additional sewage capacity for the squash courts and pro shop and asked to be put on the waiting list. Mr. Poger noted that the Fire Chief has noted a problem with access for fire vehicles. Mr. Burge -laid that he and the chief had differing ideas of what was adequate fire protection, and he felt that altering the plan would be detrimental to the facility. Ms. Bechtel noted that the Chief's concern was the ability to reach the center of the building, and he had suggested flipping the building and the parking lot. Mr. Bergh said that would eliminate the one central desk aid the control. of in -out traffic. He added there had been a lot of vandalism in the area. Mr. Doolev moved that the item be continued at least two weeks at the convenience of the applicant and that the Fire Chief be asked o come in and ex2iain his concerns and n the meantime that the applicant and Fire Chief be encouraged o reach a com- promise. Mr. Burgess seconded with unanimous approval. L�- 5. PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 14, 1984 3. That the plan be amended to show site drainage prior to permit. 4. That the applicant supply percolation tests for on site sewage_ disposal to the City Engineer for his approval._ 5. That there shall tie no engine run-uss_duri K the hours of 11.00 pm to 6:00 am. 6. That a S1500 bond for the firerydrant and_ a bond of $13, 0 for landscap'ng�be_pgsted prior to permit. 7. That the heist shall not exceed .44__feet. 8. That a separator be provided_ to.,,separate out__petrQ.Jeum. wastes from the waste waters before,__they_ gQ_ put t_Q dry -."Ila 9. That this approval expires in 6 months._ Mr. Jacob seconded the motion. Mr. Jacob felt that when the City Manager/Engineer looked at changes to a plan, he should initial and date the changes. Mr. Goodrich noted that some stipulations might hold up the plan and that Air North needed to start excavation this week to meet its schedule. After some discussion, the Commission said that if it was legal to start excavation now, they had no objection, but no building could be started yet. Consider site plan application for Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc. for construction of a nursery and"a-20,000- sq. _f_t. office building and sports science facility located on Twin Uaks Terrace Ms. Bechtel said the 'Zoning Board last night had given approval for the nursery, but the rest of the application had been withdrawn. The applicant is now only requesting approval for the nursery. Mr. Poger felt that if plans which showed only the nursery addition were not available, the Commission could not review the plan. He felt the plan should come back in two weeks with only the nursery addition shown, and the applicant, Mr. Peter Bergh, agreed to withdraw the plan and come back for the next meeting. Informally consider rezoning request of Carl H. Lisman for parcel located at the corner of Williston Road and Mills Avenue and the next westerly lot Mr. Lisman said that Arline Barovick Peterson had obtained an option on the Garvey property on Williston Road with an eye toward operating a real estate office from the home. She was told that that use was not appropriate due to the zoning of the land, and that the owner of the lot next to the Garvey property had had trouble developing it also. Mr. Lisman said he was aware that there were residential areas behind this lot and across the street, but that if the property could be rezoned to Cl, many of the uses people might find objectionable could be prohibited by covenant and he referred to his 7/12/84 letter to the Commission. Mrs. Maher asked if consolidation of the two lots discussed was ueing proposed and was told it was not. She pointed out that if the zoning on both lots were changed, that would leave a small non-conformirip lot on the corner. Mr. Lisman did not feel residential was a practical use for the corner lot. Mr. Poger was concerned that rezoning one or two lots would leave the Commission open to a charge of spot zoning. He also felt that �.Uv� Ply _����__ (� Date Received By J S 6__ c Date Application Completed and Received i BY BY CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIUV 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER /OF: (a) Owner of Record (b) Applicant (c) Contact Person 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 3) PROPOSED USE(S): 4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e., # of units, c c/C- area, tc D.) 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full part time) ' 6) COST ESTIMATES (a) Buildings (b) Landscaping (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., \curbwork) 7) ESTIMATED :RAGE ECTCa1PLETION DATE8) ESTIMATED DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) 9) PEAK HOUR(S) OF OPERATION �O 10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Q ATE C67iT7 (� /s= ee C-) SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT cc — 'CVO ;y Tate Received j B <i -�' f �- Date Application Completed and Received By CITY OF SOUTH B APPLICATION FOR SITE 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE "NUMBER OF: (a) Owner of Record t�//'�i% f�/ �1�G� , i- za-'ew"'o BURL 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 3) PROPOSED USE(S): By (_ PLAN REVIEGd 4) SlIZ OiO�PR07/# ���5� floor /�/ (i.e., of units, f oor area, etc.) 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) G�CG1'/ % C!�%GG/ 6) COST ESTIMATES:,/ ,Cd�J (a) Buildings�iery V C' U (b) Landscaping � (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) 7) ESTIMATED PROJECT' Ca1PLETION DATE � 61,01 ey G �W 8) 9) 10) ' �0/84 MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Peter Bergh for Burlington Indoor Tennis, Inc., for the construction of an 1100 square foot nursery and a 7200 square foot fitness center as depicted on a plan entitled "Twin Oaks Tennis and Fitness Center Master Plan" as prepared by Peter Bergh Associates, Shelburne, Vermont and latest revision dated 8/10/84 with the following stipulations: 1) The number, variety and caliper of plantings shall be sub- mitted to the Planner for approval prior to permit. 2) A landscaping bond in the amount of $8000 shall be posted prior to permit. 3) A sewer allocation of 900 gallons per day for the fitness center be made in accordance with the South Burlington Sewer Policy. No allocation is required for the nursery. 4) A drainage plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer for his approval prior to permit. 5) Sidewalks shall be continuous across driveways at grade of existing driveway. 6) Curb cuts shall include depressed concrete curbs across the entire opening. 7) This approval expires in 6 months. To: South Burlington From: Jane S. Bechtel, h9 E M O R A N D U M U Planning Commission,---)�L. City Planner W Re: September 11, 1984 Agenda Date: 9/7/84 2) Carl Lisman will present his argument for rezoning One Kennedy Drive. 3� Peter Jacobs has requested that 329 to 341 Dorset Street be rezoned from R4 to Cl. I will notify owners of this request prior to the meeting and will have tax maps available. BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER,)95 KENNEDY DRIVE The applicant proposes to construct an 1100 square foot nursery and an addition to the fitness center of approximately 7200 square feet. The Zoning Board will consider granting a conditional use permit and a variance to exceed the maximum lot coverage by approximately 4%. Assuming this is granted, my comments are as follows: Pedestrian and Vehicular Access_: Walkways are proposed from the parking lots to the building. The existing parking lot serves 70 cars; thirty spaces are proposed in the new lot. The applicant is willing to connect the two lots if two curb cuts are not desired on Twin Oaks Terrace. Circulation: Plans show the minimum of 20 feet between aisles. Landscaping and Screening: The number and variety of new and existing landscaping should be shown. The landscaping value should be at least $8000. Other: Sewer capacity is not available. The nursery should not require additional capacity because facilities are being moved with- in the building. The new addition will require an allocation in accordance with the Sewer Policy. Required usage is estimated at 900 gallons per day. Chief Goddette does not believe adequate fire protection can be given to the new or existing building due to an inability to have access to or set up equipment along the entire front of the build- ing. He believes if the new addition is moved and greater circulation is provided along the front of the building, access will he improved. The applicant has considered this arrangement and finds it unwork- able due to the requirements of his business such as one, central Memorandum September 11, 1984 agenga items 9/7/84 Page 2 entrance and check point area etc. Meetings between the Chief, Peter Bergh and myself have been held and resulted in no agreement. This should be discussed. 5) JOHN RUSSELL, 10 COTTAGE GROVE AVENUE The applicant proposed to convert half of a duplex (1612 square feet) into office space. The area is zoned Commercial -1 and office space is a permitted use. Request for a multiple use permit (office and residential use) will be considered by the Zoning Board on September 10. Assuming it is granted, my comments are as follows: Pedestrian and Vehicular Access: The existing 20 foot wide driveway is adequate. Circulation: The proposed parking lot at the back of the lot has 20 foot aisles as required. Circulation is adequate. Parking: Seven spaces are proposed and are adequate for the office use. Two additional are available for the residential use. Landscaping: Existing landscaping is adequate. Other: See Bill Szymanski's comments regarding drainage. Chief Goddette has no problems with the proposal. 6) FASSETTS BAKERY, SOUTH OF 1693 SHELBURNE ROAD This subdivision application received preliminary approval on May 8, 1984. The issues raised at that approval have been resolved as follows: Access: Lots #2 and 3 will share one access drive, opposite Harbor View Road onto Shelburne Road. Lot #1 will have access through a private road to Wickes Lumber and Fassetts Bakery. The State Agency of Transportation has given preliminary approval for access permits. Sewer Capacity: 1500 gallons per day of sewer capacity were allocated to these lots. We have over committed ourselves at the Bartlett Bay Treatment Plant. This application is second on the list. No building permit can be issued until capacity is avilable. Other: Chief Goddette states that the present hydrants are sufficient at this time. Actual building proposals may require additional hydrants at site plan review due to size and/or location. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 9/7/84 4) TWIN OAKS TENNIS CENTER 1. A drainage plan shall be submitted. Gt 2. Sidewalks shall be continuous across driveways` grade of existing. 3. Curb cuts shall include depressed concrete curbs across the entire opening. 4. Sewer allocation is estimated at 900 gallons per day based on State Standards. 5) JOHN RUSSELL FOR ROSE M. BILLADO ESTATE, COTTAGE GROVE AVENUE 1. Method of handling parking lot and driveway drainage should be shown. 6) FASSETT'S BAKERY PROPERTY, SHELBURNE ROAD No Comments. 7) BERARD LOT, ETHAN ALLEN DRIVE 1. Lot drainage shall be toward the northeast and not toward the adjacent properties. 2. On site sewage disposal data including percolation tests shall be submitted for review and approval. 8) CEDRIC DEMERITT (ADAMS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY) 1. If a new curb opening is constructed it shall be concrete depressed to 12 inches above existing street grade. 2. On site sewage disposal data including percolation tests shall be submitted for review and approval. September 7, 1984 Mr. Peter Bergh RD 4 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Dear Mr. Bergh: Enclosed is the agenda for the Planning Commission meeting of September 11, 1984 at 7:30 P.M. Please be sure someone is present to represent your application. c� I am also enclosing a copy of my memo wh the Planning Commission and Bill Szymanski's comments. Please callraae- if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg 3 Encls . Jut4 Nurtingto 1 fire BepcAA tent V 575 Barset #treet *nut4 igurlingtnn. Uermnnt 05401 ' - _ z rf T /r• Mr.. Sidney Poger South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Dear Mr. Poger, Chairman Planning Commission VErmont 05401 OFFICE OF JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR. CHIEF 863-6455 September 6,1984 Plans were reviewed by the fire department for the new additions to the Twin Oaks Tennis Center on September 6,1984. At this time I feel we do not have proper access to give protection for the buildings on the property now and any new buildings will give us additional problems. I do feel with changes in the parking area and relocation of the new courts proper fire protection could be given If there are any questions please feel free to -call me. Sincerely ames W. Goddette Sr Chief M--te Q �o zo,- �Vaj", cm"t �\,F�Fo C5 �p��esMc ,:N v 4v cu�ws ?-Z>yzr� � l.�`pSCa�1� Q S \vim 11 fe, t' U.n l Ti�e " &odZ� 8, )/ 8 4 JSB MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Peter Bergh, for Burlington Indoor Tennis, Inc., for the construction of a 1100 square foot nursery and a 21j500 square Post office/physical fitness complex as depicted on a site plan en- titled "Twin Oaks Tennis and Fitness Center, Master Plan" as prepared by Peter Bergh Associates, Shelburne, Vermont, dated 7/19/84 with the following stipulations: 1. That parking lot drainage shall include inlets and piping to the street system. 2. That a 15 foot strip of landscaped area will be installed along the northern side of the lot. 3. That 22 parking spaces along the northern edge of the westerly lot be eliminated. 4. That a landscaping plan, valued at $12,000 be submitted to the Planner for approval prior to permit. 5. That a performance bond of $12,000 for landscaping be posted prior to permit. 6. That the height shall not exceed 42 feet. 7. That a sewer allocation of 1000 g.p.d. shall in accordance with the South Burlington sewer policy and that this applicant shall be number seven on the waiting list. 8. That this approval expires in 6 months. City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 PLANNER 658-7955 August 20, 1984 Peter Bergh Box 4505 RD 4 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Dear Peter: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are the minutes from the August 14 Planning Commission meeting. I have tried unsucessfully to reach you today and last week. I will hve to receive any revised site plans by Tuesday, August 21 in order to be considered by the Commission August 28. Please call me to let me know your intentions. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg 1 Encl bl-/ 31 State of Vermont •.. ; �" • w i STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE RE: 4C0183-1 Certified to Comply with ICV Construction, Inc. Environmental Protection Rules: Suite 3C Chapter 4 - Public Buildings 95 St. Paul Street Chapter 9 - Plumbing Burlington, Vermont 05401 This project consisting of constructing an addition to the existing Twin Oaks Tennis Center for 4 sg0ash courts, 2 racquet ball courts, aerobic dancing area, and offices for an increase of 75 members located off Twin Oaks Terrace in the City of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions: (1) The project must be completed as shown on the plans "Master Plan" last revised on January 12, 1985 prepared by Peter Bergh Associates and on the plans P-1 and P-2 each dated February 26, 1985, revised March 11, 1985 prepared by Northeastern HVAC and which have been stamped APPROVED by the Division of Protection. No alteration of these plans shall be allowed except where written application has been made to the Agency of Environmental Conservation and approval obtained. (2) The Division of Protection is to be notified prior to the closing or covering of any waste plumbing so that we may inspect the workmanship. (3) The Master Plumber responsible for the interior plumbing shall indicate in writing, prior to occupancy, that the work has been done in accordance with the approved plans and the Environmental Protection Rules, Effective September 10, 1982. (4) The applicant is reminded that all plumbing material and workmanship must meet the standards of the Environmental Protection Rules, Chapter 9, Plumbing; the National Plumbing Code; and the requirements of the Vermont Fire Prevention Section of the Department of Labor and Industry. (5) A copy of the approved plans and the Land Use Permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or Local personnel. (6) The Vermont Department of Health is to be contacted in regard to any regulations and/or licenses required by their department. (They may be reached at 60 Main Street, Burlington, Vermont, or by phoning 802-863-7220.) 4C0183-1 ICV Construction Page 2 Dated this llth day of April, 1985 in the Village of Essex Junction, Vermont. FOR THE DIVISION OF PROTECTION Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer cc: Donald Robisky Katherine Vose Department of Health Department of Labor & Industry City of Burlington Northeastern HVAC Peter Bergh - -------- -- il k�q)lcdxlj Olk X)MI-A --�, ce-k — ------- - ------- September 14, 1984 Peter Bergh RD 4 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Dear Peter: :inclosed are the minutes from the Planning Commission of September 11, 1984. I have placed your application on the Commissions agenda for September 25. In the meantime, I hope we can find a mutually suitable solution to the problems with fire access. Chief Goddette is reviewing your plans and I will be in touch with you as soon as possible. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planeer JSB/mcg 1 Encl Investors Corporation of Vermont ICV Construction, Inc. April 19, 1985 Ms. Katherine M. Vose District Coordinator State of Vermont Environmental Board District Environmental Commission #4 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Re: Burlington Indoor Tennis Center Application #4C0183-1 Dear Katherine: Enclosed please find copies of letters from Vermont Gas and Green Mountain Power with regards to the above mentioned project. As you can see they both indicate adequate service availability. Thank you for your assistance. please call. If you should have any questions Sincerely yours, Ann Beath AH/sia Enclosures cc: City of South Burlington Regional Environmental Ca— fission Suite 2C, 126 College Street d� t t Burlington, Vermont 05401 (802) 863-2311 Vermont Gas* P.O. Box 467, Burlington, Vermont 05402 802-863-4511 ICV 126 College Street Burlington, VT 05401 Attention Paul Sprayragen Dear Paul: March 29, 1985 TWIN OAKS TENNIS CENIFR, KM4EDY DRIVE, SOLMI BURLINGTON In regards to the proposed additional load at Twin Oaks Tennis Center, South Burlington, please be advised that we have adequate service and capacity available for the projected increased load of 500 ccf/hr. Vermont Gas Systems can serve this additional load without affecting our present firm customers. If we can be of further assistance, please call. M P/gm Very truly yours, Michael J. Poirier Manager, Commercial Sales Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. GREEN MOUNTAIN POWER CORPORATION TWENTY-FIVE GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE, P.O. BOX 850 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402 802/864-5731 April 16, 1985 I.C.V. Construction 126 College Street Suite 2C Burlington, VT 05401 Attn: Mr. Paul Sprayregen Dear Mr. Sprayregen: Reference is made to your request concerning electrical ser- vice for the proposed four court expansion of the existing Twin Oakes Tennis structure on Kennedy Drive in the City of South Burlington, Vermont. Under the existing Vermont Public Service Law, Green Mountain Power Corporation is required "to furnish reasonably adequate service, accommodations and facilities to the public." Historically, the company has been able to anticipate custo- mer's requirements, and has provided the necessary facilities for added loads. It is our intention to continue this policy in accordance with applicable Public Service Board regulations. Assuming the project is approved by the necessary agencies, Green Mountain Power Corporation will cooperate in every way to provide safe, adequate and reliable electrical service, when it is needed. Details concerning service size and location, scheduling, costs, etc., should be discussed with Mr. J. M. Fontaine of the Williston Commercial Office. Very truly yours, Walter C. Hipp Director of Engineering WCH:dt cc: J. M. Fontaine Eng. Dept. file (LDA) Gen. File October 24, 1984 Peter Bergh RD 4 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Dear Peter: Enclosed are the Findings of Fact from your recent Site Plan approval. Please be sure to apply for your building permit or request an extension if sewer capacity is unavailable before the 6 month expiration date. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg 1 Encl C-c�N,00 7� boo b,= LA LA 1A 0 Rk4 ci "Ty�s-,JA Lc�nDs 6T &MO 6 &,t-v 6,0 , s- pexcf-- sc 0. " A, I—t T-- L, C ox (-o )t\ 0 Ll ac) vak�� �unA.�r�G�Ss� �Y�,00� `enrll.o oo ct +� o 0 s CC( VD - k 41\0A U tvQ- . fi COCV\k- LAck 7/�-7 Memorandum Agenda items for August 14, 1984 August 10, 1984 Page 3 The items of concern are as follows: Pedestrian and Vehicular Access: Access will be through the Airport property, off of Route 2. It will not be available to the general public. Circulation and Parking: The Parking lot is adequate with 20 spaces provided. The area around the building is paved to allow full circulation. Landscaping: A $13,500 bond for landscaping is required. Additional plantings will be required to meet this requirement. Hemlock and Yew are proposed and will be fairly dense. An embankment will be cut away to build the hangar. The sandy soils should be stabilized as quickly as possible. At the previous Air Vermont approval, the noise committee requested that dense evergreens be planted between the top of the crest and the new bottom of the bank to cut down on noise. The sandy soils should be stabilized. The chain link fence will be relocated. Other: Chief Goddette has reviewed this plan with the Air Guard Chief and requests an additional fire hydrant. Two are already available on site. (See Goddette memo) The airplane hangar is a taller structure than allowed by the regulations. The 44 foot height requires your approval and determination that this structure (above the 35 foot maximum) 1) will utilize topography and relate to other existing and proposed structures so as to be aesthetically compatible; 2) will not detract from scenic views; and 3) will allow retention of additional green space to enhance the appearance of the property. (Zoning Regulations - Section 18.112b) I believe these items can be determined with confidence. 7) Burlington Tennis Club, Twin Oaks Terrace The applicant proposes to construct a nursery containing approximately 1100 square feet, and a 21,500 square foot office/physical fitness complex at a height of 42 feet. On August 13, the Zoning Board will consider a request to allow the applicant to exceed the maximum allowable (60%) coverage, for a variance of Section 19.104, parking and circulation exceeding the maximum 30% front yard coverage, and a waiver of the maximum height to allow a 42 foot structure as well as the conditional use permit. Assuming these are granted, my comments are as follows: Pedestrian and Vehicular Access: The one existing access drive is proposed to serve two large lots for 70 and 62 cars. This appears to be overburdening the one access point and a new drive may be,adviseable. Memorandum Agenda items for August 14, 1984 August 10, 1984 Page 4 Circulation: Aisles between parking spaces are adequate. Parking: Seventy spaces are existing in the easterly lot. Sixty two additional are proposed. The 15,000 square feet of office space requires 60, and the 5000 plus square foot sports facility requires additional, although we have no stand- ard for this. The existing spaces are frequently full, according to the applicant. This massive building requires over 60 spaces, which forces the applicant to pave most of the surrounding area. If this size building is approved by the Zoning Board, I recommend waiving parking spaces in the front yard along Twin Oaks Terrace, in order to preserve some of the lot's appearance. Landscaping and Screening: Although trees are shown on the plan, the number, variety, size, and the new and existing have not been shown. The required land- scaping is $12,000. Given the excessive lot coverage on this portion, I question whether $12,000 worth of plantings can be tastefully installed. Other: The height will be 42' requiring a 47 foot front yard setback. The Commission must determine whether this height is justified by whether 1) it utilized existing topography and relates to other existing and proposed structures, so as to be aesthetically compatible with the neighborhood; 2) it will not detract from scenic views of adjacent properties or public streets and walk- ways and 3) it will allow retention of additional green space that will enhance the appearance of the developed property. The Commission should carefully and thoroughly discuss these requirements. 8/14/84 JSB MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Site Plan application of Peter Bergh for Burlington Indoor Tennis, Inc., for the construction of an 1100 square foot nursery as depicted on a plan entitled "Twin Oaks Tennis and Fiteess Center, Master Plan" as prepared by Peter Bergh Associates, Shelburne, Vermont, dated 7/19/84 with the following stipulations: 1. That a revised plan be submitted for the Planner's approval showing only the proposed 1100 square foot nursery and no other additions, changes or revisions to the lot or structures. 2. That a performance bond for landscaping, in an amount toy be determined by the City Planner, be posted prior to permit. 3. That this approval expires in 6 months. ) )13/84 jSB MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Peter Bergh, for Burlington Indoor Tennis, Inc., for the construction of a 1100 square foot nursery and a 21 ) 500 square Pest office/physical fitness complex as depicted on a site plan en- titled "Twin Oaks Tennis and Fitness Center, Master Plan" as prepared by Peter Bergh Associates, Shelburne, Vermont, dated 7/19/84 with the following stipulations: 1. That parking lot drainage shall include inlets and piping to the street system. 2. That a 15 foot strip of landscaped area will be installed along the northern side of the lot. 3. That 22 parking spaces along the northern edge of the westerly lot be eliminated. 4. That a landscaping plan, valued at $12,000 be submitted to the Planner for approval prior to permit. 5. That a performance bond of $12,000 for landscaping be posted prior to permit. 6. That the height shall not exceed 42 feet. 7. That a sewer allocation of 1000 g.p.d. shall in accordance with the South Burlington sewer policy and that this applicant shall be number seven on the waiting list. 8. That this approval expires in 6 months. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Planner Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 8/10/84 3) MEDICAL OFFICE, 1540 WILLISTON ROAD 1. The parking lot drainage should be intercepted and piped into the Williston Road drainage system. The area is flat and subject to spring ponding; the new parking lot will add to the problem by the increased runoff and/or forcing the runoff on to adjacent property especially if the parking area is filled and enlarged. 4) LIBERTY/MYERS No comments 5) CHITTENDEN TRUST COMPANY, Dorset Street No comments 6) Air North Hangar, Burlington International Airport 1. Site will require extensive excavation. Method of disposing of this material must be defined and if disposed off the project site, it will require Zoning Board approval. 2. Plan should show site drainage. 3. Perculation tests for on site sewage disposal shall be furnished. 4. There should be no engine runups during the hours of 11:00 P.M. to 6:00 A.M. 7) TWIN OAKS TENNIS CENTER, TWIN OAKS DRIVE 1. Parking lot drainage shall include inlets and piping to the street system. 2. The frontage landscaped strip as required by the regulations should be maintained. This has worked well;it provides snow storage and prevents parked cars from extending over the sidewalk. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: James Goddette, Fire Chief Re: Burlington Indoor Tennis Center Date: 8/9/84 My concern is that there will be too much congestion on the property with these proposed additions. This hampers the flow of traffic, and restricts protection of the existing and proposed buildings. August 10, 1984 Peter Bergh Box 4505 RD 4 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Dear Peter; Enclosed is a copy of the Planning Commission agenda for the Tuesday, August 14 meeting. Please be sure someone is present to represent the Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc., Site Plan application. Also enclosed is a copy of my memo to the Planning Commission and any other pertinent materials. Be sure to call me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jane S. Bechtel, City Planner JSB/mcg Encl M E M O R A N D U M 'Ib: South Burlington Planning Commission From: James Goddette, Fire Chief Re: Burlington Indoor Tennis Center Date: 8/9/84 My concern is that there will be too much congestion on the property with these proposed additions. This hampers the flow of traffic, and restricts protection of the existing and proposed buildings. c or?, zws o Ls �. 07 , o ccc�ss r 44e. -to Ck �u..�.A�,, , �c�, (C�10 � lord. C,. — PrQ q r 6x� mrY -0. C� 0�ficz. = �a v oj� -? �000)�opaD- .) I I O-V & ,�L�O' �WO-q �, ox, ItAL j aA.AjA Cc_ i