Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0000 Twin Oaks Terrace (2)State of Vermont s � � v Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist August 31, 1998 Robert Perry, Esquire Perry & Schmucker Attorneys at Law 1480 Williston Road South Burlington, VT 05403 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Telephone #(802) 879-5656 Dear Bob: Subject:'- Y Twin Oaks Condominiums - Certification of Compliances #4CO294 through #4CO294- 5; located in South Burlington, Vermont. Our office has received a construction completion report from your consultant, DuBois & King, Inc. This satisfies the conditions of the above referenced Certification of Compliances regarding the construction of the sanitary sewers. Thank you for your close attention to the permit conditions and please contact me should you need anything further. Sincerely, L �' 0 -1 41- P ��A K11�1 �-� Ernest Christianson Regional Engineer c Town of South Burlington DuBois & King, Inc. u State of Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation Department of Environmental Conservation State Geologist September 3, 1998 Lance Llewellyn Llewellyn Incorporated 4049 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dear Lance: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division 111 West Street Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Telephone #(802) 879-5656 Subject: Certificates of Compliance 44CO103 and amendments, Stonehedge Condominiums, South Burlington, Vermont. I am writing in response to your letter dated September 2, 1998 regarding the inspection of the sewer system for the above mentioned project. In March of this year, your firm did inspect some of the existing sewer system manholes and found that you were unable to inspect all the manholes due to snow cover, tree limbs and sod cover. Your report indicated that the manhole structures inspected did appeared to be well built and tight, however you did note there was evidence of infiltration at some manholes. Your report also noted that several manholes should be cleaned out. Regarding the clusters and permit conditions, I will accept your report as a preliminary submittal. It is my understanding that your firm has been retained by the association to complete the inspection of the manholes, and you estimate that this will be completed within the next 4 to 6 weeks. The sale of Unit J20 is scheduled to close this week. Since the manhole immediately adjacent to this cluster was inspected and found to be in good condition, and the association in taking the necessary steps to complete the inspection, cleaning and any required repairs, I do not have a problem with the closing proceeding as planned. Please be advised that we will expect the remaining manholes be inspected, the source(s) of infiltration in some of the manholes should be corrected, the sewer system cleaned as needed, and your final report submitted by November 1, 1998. This is an attempt to obtain voluntary compliance with the permit conditions. If this report is not submitted on time, future closings may be held up. Please forward a copy of this letter to the appropriate parties. Sincerely, J sanne Wyman Assistant Regional Engineer City of South Burlington T PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 5, 1977 Public hearing on preliminary plat application of T.H.A. Inc., 196 apart- ment units at Twin Oaks Terrace, Messrs. Babcock and Ram For. Babcock said that this plan was complete and met all the requests of the city. He was interested in the streets remaining private and had reserved a 60' width for these roads. The buildings are set -back 30' and he did not feel that drainage was necessary, since the site has excellent natural drainage. He also felt that the pumping station should be used for the entire project. Finally, he said, he was aware of the Growth Policy and wanted to have some idea of the phasing that would be expected of them because it bears on the cost. He also wanted to discuss the recreation fee with the City Council. Mr. Wessel raised the question of the roads and asked Mr. Page why Mr. Szymanski has asked that the one running east -west on the north side of the project be public. Mr. Page replied that that would connect two abut- ting properties and could eventually become a road parallel to Kennedy Drive and connecting Dorset Street and Hinesburg Road. This is not intended to become an arterial road, but would provide access for fire -fighting and would allow people to get from one project to another without going onto an arterial road. Mr. Ewing.- said that he would like to see this. It would provide a second access to the project, allow the school bus to go in and pick up children, and he agreed with Mr. Szymanski that it would be a benefit to the safety and welfare of the people to have that a public street. I•ir. Page pointed out that signing and curves could be used to slow the traffic down on this street. Mr. Babcock said that he had never had a public street in one of his projects and he was afraid that it would increase costs and might be harder to market with it in�-there. Mr. Wessel said that the engineering standards are the same whether the road is public or private. Mr. Page pointed out that there is a design criterion that says that no more than 50 dwelling units should be served from a single access to a city street. The number is just a guideline, but T.H.A. is proposing much more than that. At this point, Mr. Andy Deeds, a property owner, said that the Tilley property is just about undevelopable and that he was also opposed to having a public road in there. He wanted to see some sort of emergency access such as moveable ballards or posts with chains. Mr. Ewing moved that the Planning Commission make this a public street, owned by the city, deeded to the city, built to city specifications, from Kennedy Drive to the corner of the Tilley property with a temporary turn- around at the end of the street as shown on the plat. The motion was seconded by Mr. Morency. Mr. Babcock asked what kind of turn -around had been requested and was told that it could be a gravel surfaced place for the snowplow to turn around. He reiterated his opposition to a city street. Messrs. `doolery and Levesque voted nay, the others voted aye, and the motion carried. Mr. Vessel asked if theylere going to alter the natural run-off of the area. Mr. Levesque said that he felt that natural drainage should be used more than it is, and Mr. idorency said that he would like Mr. Szymanski to look at the site for natural drainage. It was agreed that although the Co=ission could not waive the requirements for curbing and catch basins without further evidence, they would like i.:r. Szymanski to be open to other types of drainage. PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 5, 1977 The question of phasing was then discussed. The first phase of the project will be 90 units, with a total of 196. Mr. Babcock said that they were willing to modify the numbers but that they needed to know if they were going to be able to build the whole thing. Mr. Vessel said that they would have make that decision later because they are unsure of what units they will have for allocation. This year there are very few left, but neat year there may be more. Mr. Babcock said that he felt that the Commission had an obligation to developers to reserve for them the right to complete their projects. Mr. 1:orency said that they would check the fis-ures of the policy and Mr. Babcock said that they would work with the Commission. He said that if they had to, they could make the project 3 phases rather than 2 by building_60 in each of the first two years, and 76 in the third. He added that he felt that the recrea -fez-was-Aoo h-1U —6inc h y are providing a tennis facility for these people. fir. Woolery asked about how many children would be in the project and was told about 88. He explained that the city needs room for.organized sports for school children and that is why the fee has been set. vir. Morency pointed out that the Commission had discussed the Growth Policy on the preliminary plat application of 435 Dorset Street. MIr. 1-loolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the preliminary plat of Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, for subdivision of a parcel of 39.9 acres into two lots of 35.1 and 4.8 acres, as depicted on a __plan entitled "Twin Oaks Apartments . . . Preliminary Plat A. Judson Bab- cock and Burlington Indoor Tennis Inc." dated 2/18/77, revised 21 7 4 6 77 4 1 77 and 4/27/77. prepared by T.H.A. Inc and P.B.A. Inc. subject to the following stipulations: 1) that the deed for the property be transferred to the City, including Twin Oaks Terrace, and shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to final plat approval. The draft of such a deed shall be submitted to the City Attorney at least 15 days prior to the final plat public hearing 2) warning for the final Dlat hearing shall take place on compliance with the above stipulation plus final Dlat required submissions The motion was seconded by Mr. Ewing and passed unanimously. Mr. lroolery then moved that the South Burlington Planninr Commission approve the Preliminary Plat of A. Judson Babcock for 196 apartment units, as depicted on a plan entitled "Twin Oaks Apartments. . . Preliminary Plat A. Judson Babcock and Burlington Indoor Tennis Inc." dated 2 18 77 revised 21 7 4/6/77, 419 77 and 4 27 77, prepared by T.H.A. Inc, and P B.A Inc., subject to the following stipulations: 1) a final determination on traffic impact shall be made by the Com- .pission during final plat review. 2) 1he outlines of the paved private road surface be 27' wide and at least 24' between opposing parking areas and shall be shown on the final plat. 3) curbing location and specifications shall be as approved by the City Engineer and shown on the final plat. PLANNING COW4ISSION MAY 5, 1977 4) a storm drainage system shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. 5) the final plat shall show all walkways between buildings and parking areas. 6) ownership of the roadway shall be public as described in James Ewing's motion pg. 4 and the balance of the roads shall be private. 7) all subsequent submissions shall be on plans indicating approved building locations. 8) a temporary cul-de-sac shall be required at the terminus of the phase 1 roadway, per James Ewing's motion pg. 4), and shall be in accord with the recommendations of the City Engineer on layout and specifications. 9) The following requests for waivers are approved: temporary field markers. 10) warning for the final plat hearing will occur only after applicant has complied with the applicable conditions of this approval and final plat required submissions. The motion was seconded by Mr. Levesque and then amended to add: 11) all phases of this project are subject to the city's Growth Policv. The motion was passed unanimously. Public hearing on proposed amendments concerning day care centers and the Zoning Board of Adlustment Mr. Woolery moved that the proposed amendments to the 1974 South Burlington Zoning Ordinance as discussed in the public hearing held by the South Burlington Planning Commission on Tuesday, pri , a in the Conference Room at City Hall be incorporated into the Zoning Ordinance and that the text of these amendments be forwarded to the City Council for their approval per the provisions of the enabling legislation. The motion was seconded by fir. Morency and passed unanimously. The meeting was declared adjourned at 11:30 pm. Clerk PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 13, 1977 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, September 13, 1977 at 7:30 pm. in the Conference Room, Municipal Offices, 1175 Williston Road. Members Present William Wessel, Chairman; Ernest Levesque, David Morency, Kirk Woolery, James Ewing, Jan Rozendaal ,..ember Absent Sidney Poger Cthers Present Stephen Page, Planning Assistant; A. Judson Babcock, Michael Ram, Don Swain, William Schuele, R. Gonyea., H. Warner, Tom Chastenay, Scott MacKay, Free Press; Warren Schwerin Minutes of August 30 and September 8, 1977 The minutes of September 8 were deferred to the neat meeting. In the August 30 minutes, on page 1, in the last paragraph, it should read that there will be 6 clusters, not 3. Yr. Woolery moved to aaorove the minutes as amended. The motion was seconded by Mr. Morency and passed unanimously. Continuation of public hearing on final plat application of Twin Oaks Associates 180 units, off Twin Oaks Terrace Mr. Page said there had been only minor modifications to the plan. Mr. Wessel asked what had happened about the streets and was told that the city street would be 30' wide and curbed all the way. Mr. Page said that the major issue was the traffic and that the applicants have submitted a traffic study on the two nearest intersections. r1r. Swain told the Commission where he had gotten his data and'said that the conclusion of the study was that Twin Oaks traffic will not create an unstable condition in any of the intersection approaches studied. He said that the Commission had been mistaken to consider a 70`F V/C ratio as a desirable level, and said that a load of 1 is approaching instability. In that case, he said, the only problem is the I-89 exit ramp, which mould be at 90. He said that when an intersection reached 85% it was time for the Com- mission and the Council to think about allocating planning and money for improve- ments. Changing the green cycles of the light at the I-89 exit would help lower the load factor quite a bit and adding another lane would greatly improve the situation. fir. Swain re-emphasized that Twin Oaks would not create a major influence on traffic there. In response to questions, *dr. Swain said that his figures referred to traffic returning to Twin Oaks at the peak hour. Mr. Rozendaal was told that they had determined where the traffic was coming from by talking to Mr. Page and others and that Digital traffic had been considered. i•S. Swain said that if the study was biased, it was biased upward. Yr. Page said that some of vr. Swain's fiE•,;res were sup,orted by fiCares frCM siyilar developments and said that there was enough riEht of way to :have more ramps on the I-89 exit. He also said tat chanEinE, the green time cycles could Eive them about 5% more capacity, and said that when the Dorset Street -Williston Road intersection c::anEes were made, more cars might go throuEh that intersection. '.'.r. Morency said that he did not question Yr. Swain's competence but that the 2. PLANNING COMN.ISSION SEPTEMBER 13, 1977 city has no way of evaluating the report in a professional way and that there could be many different opinions of the data. He felt that the Commission needed some one with traffic expertise to help them out. Mr. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat of Twin Oaks Associates, for development of.a 35.1 acre arcel into 180 apartment units as depicted on a plan set 11 pages entitled "Site Plan - Twin Oaks Apartments..." dated 7 30 77, revised 8 17 77 drawn by Landplan Inc. subject to the following stipulations: 1) Five fire hydrants are to be installed, as recommended by the Fire Chief. 2) The design and specifications of the temporary turn grounds, at the end . of Phase 1, the end of the city street, and the private street shall be as approved_ by the City Engineer. 3) A sidewalk, to,city standards, shall be installed on the north side of the city street, extending from the existing sidewalk on Twin Oaks Terrace to Cluster 1; this sidewalk shall beshown on the final plat. The sidewalk required for the balance of the city street is hereby waived. 4) A pedestrian easement shall be shown along the old railroad bed right of way and within the pokerline easement, extending from west to.east Ines. 5) The project shall be constructed in 3 phases, to be composed of 84 units (clusters I,II,I!1), 50 units clusters IV & V , and 46 units cluster VI 6) Landscaping plans shall be submitted to and approved by either the Tree Committee or County Forester prior to the issuance of building permits. Land- scaping bonds, as required by the ordinance shall be posted._ 7) Pavement width and roadway ownership shall be properly delineated on the final plat; with the exception of the sidewalk as noted above the city street_ shall be fully built to city standards,_ 8) Layout and specifications for the private street shall be as approved by the City Engineer._ 9) Sewer water and storm drainage facilities, including detailed con- struction plans, shall be a proved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. 10) A recreation fee of �9870 shall be paid in proportion to the number, of building permits issued, at the time of issuance. 11) Shed location shall be revised so as to provide a 30' clearance between buildin;-s. 12) The final_rlat shall be reviewed by the Planning Assistant for con- ty with these stipulations, rrior to recording. 13) 1ne necessary legal documentation i.e., escrow and private road ae eeients, deeds for utility and pedestrian ease::ents, and streets, shall be s•u-cmitted to the City Attorney _�u ca,s ,rHcr 'to Issuance c: build' -lit- 3. PLANNING COMMIISSION c �' t� SEPTEMBER 73, 1977 (fir. 14) ppr'�al for phase-i..s a 1 not be issued prior to, and shall expire 6 months from, January 1, 1978 Approval for phase 2 shall not be issued prior to, and shall expire 6 months from, January 1, 1979. Approval for phase 3 shall not be issued prior to, and shall expire 6 months from, January l., 1980 15) Prior to issuing building or land development permits for phase II or III, the Commission may find, after a duly warned public hearing, that the construction of the proposed phase will exceed the city's ability to provide adequate sewage disposal, educational, and highway services due to the anticipated residents in the phase proposed, and may alter or recind its approval as based Qn those findinp-s. The motion was seconded by Mr. Yorency and passed unanimously. Mr. Woolery then moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat of Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc., for subdivision of a parcel of 39.9 acres into two lots of 35.1 and 4.8 acres, as depicted on a plan etLtle� "Site Plan - Twin Oaks Apartments", dated 7 30 77 revised 8/1 Landplan, Inc., subject to the following stipulations: 1) The roadway to be dedicated to the City shall include an easement tc the Bergner propert kat its southeast corner and an extension of the riizht way south 200' and west 100', along the northwest corner of lot f1 so AS tri provide access to the planned entrance to the Brand property condominiums. 2) The deed for the roadway and associated land shall include the pumping station. The motion was seconded by Mr. Levesque and passed unanimously. Site Plan Review: Conversion of Carrol's Restaurant to Trencher's Fish and Chips, 408 Shelburne Road Yr. Warren Schwerin represented Windlass Corp., which runs Arthur Trencher's, and he told the Commission that they had entered an agreement with Carrol's to take over that chain. He said that the Zoning Board had given them permission to keep the use of the Shelburne Road building as a restaurant. The present building will be altered in appearance but the parking lot and curb cuts will remain the same. He felt that the impact of this restaurant would be less than Carrol's since it is a family restaurant with a higher check price and a lower volume. The landscaping plan is being prepared and some of the parking lot will be seeded and planted.. A fence and screening will be put in, the pavement will be re -painted, V and the traffic flow will be modified. Mr. Rozendaal asked if there would be take-out business and how many seats there were. He was told that there would be a little and that there were 88 seats. Yr. '�;essel asked about the outdoor lighting and asked if the lights could be about 12' high. Ns. Schwerin said that he had been hoping for 15 but would accept 12. The applicants will exceed the landscaping requirements. Yr. Foolery moved teat tije South Burlington Plennina Commission approve the s_i_te Ilan Drcposal of '+:inaiass vermcnt CCrD:>rLtion, to convert the existi ng Carroll's Restaurant at 406 Shelburne Ecad to an Arthur Trencher's...", dated unsigned, subject to the followinE stiruint,o.^.s: 1) Provisions for storm drainaC;e shall be reviewed and approved by the City EnEineer. 2- r -nn S -Cl C au L, Q. n -3 c f LL- n s h ,r 5. PLANNING COMIMISSION NOVEMBER 8, 1977 Public hearing on revised final plat of Country Park Apartments (100 uni elderly housing) Mr. Lamphere said that under the original layout the cost of the buildings could not have been.amortized satisfactorily, so the unitshavd been organized into -3 buildings. Each would be 3 stories tall, but only 2 112 stories above ground. Each building will have a recreation room within it and the area provided will be larger than in the original community building, although divided. There will be room for meetings of people from all buildings and the same facilities will be present that were in the original recreation building. Mr. Morency asked if the units would have facilities for the handicapped and was told that a certain percentage of them would. There will be 75 parking spaces arranged in a circular pattern. I:r. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application of- ores arc _-6aliy for a 2p_ ase, uni ousing project for the elderly, as depicted on a plan set pages drawn. by Aiemann- Lamp ere rc itec s and Civil engineering Associates, wi page 1 ksite plan) dated 9/6/77, revised lO IT/ and 10-/3. 1) The following stipulations of the 4/26/77 final plat approval are to be altered as follows: (a) #7* to be reworded: number and location of fire hydrants shall be as approved by e i y ngineer an ire ie . (b) #11* to be reworded: approval for phase 1 (buildings 1& 2, total of 76 units) shall mon t ns I r o m i anuary7_,_­I97g;-_DFiase 1 sna 11 -be completed prior to January 1, 19_79; approval for phase _2_(building 3, 24 units), sal l expire-� months from January 1, 1979; phase 2 shall be completed prior 'to January T, 1- 80. - ------ _ --- 2) Bus stops shall be indicated on the final plat. 3) 75 parking spaces shall be shown on the plat. 4) This approval supplements the stipulations of the final plat approval obtained 4i26 77.-- .------- 5) The project will be subject to a final engineering review by the City Bngineer. 6) The Commission will accept a name change. * 7 previously read - "show hydrant in picnic area on the plat" ,11 previously read - "phasing to be stipulated by the applicant" The motion was seconded by A-r. Ewing and passed unanimously. Public hearing on revised final plat of 11win Oars Associates (184 units "r. Page said that neither representative was present but t^at the plan was almost identical to the one that had Gained approval. Some of the units had been relocated and the building types had been charged somewi.at. There had been an increase of 4 dwelline units and a redistribution of bedrooms. The number of 3 bedroom units has decreased markedly. There will be 7 more par%ini: spaces. 'r. 'tioolery moved that the South Burlington-:lanning Commission approve the revised finale -at of :twin � azi Issociates, for 184 apart_.ent snits as_dericted N PLANNING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 8, 1977 on a plan entitled, '_'_Site_ Plan —_Twin Oaks Apartments" ..... dated 7/30/77_, revised 8%'17, 10712, and 10%20%77, drawn by Land�lany�Inc.� subject to the following stipulations: 1) The recreation fee is increased, proportionately, to a total of $10,089 for 184 units. 2) The three phases described in condition ff5 of the 9/13/77 final plat app48roval are mended to include 80, 5 , and units respectively. 3) This aDuroval supplements the stipulations of final plat ap,,roval obtained 9 13 77. Mr. Ewing seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. Mr. Wessel said that McDonald's was going to ask the Zoning Board for a use variance in two weeks and said that he felt that there should be a traffic engineer there representing the city. Mr. Page said that he had talked to one about the cost and had been told that it would cost about $500 for a day of work and an evening. Mr. Morency asked what the Commission's position on this was, and Mr. Wessel said that they were a statutory party to the meeting if they so wished. Mr. Morency felt that the Zoning Board should be presented with the results of high traffic generators, and said that he would go to the meeting if the Commission wished. He pointed out that a zoning change for that area had already been warned, and that would hopefully not allow high traffic generators there. Yr. Poger moved to send David Morency to represent the Planning Commission at the Zoning Board of Adjustment hearing and if he wishes, that he ask for a continuance of the Zoning Board public hearing. If necessary, _the Commission will use some of its_ money to hire a traffic consultant to study t_he disastrous effects of high traffic generators. The motion was seconded by-hir. Woolery -� and it passed unanimously. The :meeting was declared adjourned at 10:30 pm. clerk October 27, 11723 Mr. Gerald Mi lot 159 Pearl Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Dear Mr. 14ilot: This is to formally confirm the action of Planning Commission at its meeting of 10/24/78 final plat application for phase I revisions to Apartment project, Twin Oaks Condominiums. The meeting, plus previous approvals and pertinent ',then these conditions, plus the applicable requ subdivision regulations are complied with, boil be issued. Yours truly, Stephen Page, Planner SP/mcg Encl s the South Burlington in approving your the Twin Oaks minutes of this memos are enclosed. iremants of the ding Permits will 0 PLANNING COT-IISSION AUGUST 14, 1979 Mr. Poger felt those approaches should be C before this was developed, but Mr. Page pointed out that the developers had conditional use apyroval from the Council, which reviewed the project for traffic impact under Interim Zoning. The Commission seemed to feel that if the number of units were reduced to 16 and if fill were minimal in the area of the CO zone, it might look favorably on that. Sewage capacity is no problem and Ns. Larkin said they would put in the sidewalks. They will also extend the water line to the property line, across the road from this project. Mr. Page said that he had looked at recreation fees charged other developers in this area, and they were smaller per unit than this fee, so he recommended amending the fee a little. Mr. O'Bryan said they had talked to the City Engineer about the plans and he had OKed them. INIr. Foger said the Commission would need a meDo from the Engineer. 39 parking spaces are shown and 27 are required by ordinance. All the units have 2-bedrooms. Mr. Foger noted that the Council during its Interim Zoning hearing had felt there was no traffic problem, but he felt the Commission could agree or disagree with that assessment. Mr. Woolery moved to continue the hearing on the preliminary plat of LTH until 2 weeks from tonight, August 28, at City Hall at 7:30 pm. 2°r. Levesque seconded the motion and all were in favor. Continue public hearing on revised final plat anclication ald ?:ilot and Claude Gagne for the balance(phases II and III of the ftwin Jako condominium project Mr. Ron O'Bryan said that two weeks ago the developers had discussed with the Commission the problem of the 150' setback from the Interstate right of way, which happens to take a jog right at this point while the paved surface itself runs straight. As a result of the jag in the right of way, cluster 4 was placed close to the east property line because it could not be placed farther south. The Commission felt it would be better to have that cluster farther away from the east line so that when that property was developed, the structures would not be too close to each other. In order to move that cluster, Twin Oaks would need a variance from the 150' setback from the Zoning Board and Mr. O'Bryan asked the Commission to send a letter to the Zoning Board recommending the variance. Mrs. Neubert felt that if such a letter were sent, it would be a preference rather than a hardship that was being addressed. The Commission felt the extra buffer land between this project and one proposed on the land to the east was very desirable, and :,.r. Levesque said he would like to see the buildings constructed with more space between them than is between the ones presently on the site. Messrs. Mona and Levesque stated that they did not favor sending a formal recommendation to the Zoning Board on this issue, but noted that the minutes could be taken to the Board by anyone who wanted to. eMr. Woolery moved that the Planning, Commission notify the Zoning Board via a letter from Mr. 1-age of our intent in TermittinE a variance to achieve a wider separation betw-en a developin,- :arcel and a to be developed plot. The motion died for lack of a second. Messrs. Woolery, bona, roger and Levesque felt the variance was a good iaea; %.r. Levesque with the stiYulation that the distance between buildings was Euaranteedd, preferably at least 90'. Xessrs. 1%cna, roger and Levesque did not want to send a formal notice to the Zoning board to that effect, however. The Commission in general favored this layout over the previous layout. Mr. Woolery moved to continue the public heariny of the revised final plat 3. PLANNING COMMISSION AUGUST 14, 1979 n-Tlication of Twin Oaks condominiums until 2 weeks from tonight at City Hall, at 7:30 pm. Mr. Mona seconded the motion and it passed 5-0. Review revised layout plan for Phase II o Mr. Mona asked where the city was in its review of the project, since he understood that permits to build had been revoked. Mr. Poger stated that if there were v iolations of the zoning permits and those were rescinded, he did not want to do any business with Treetops until that matter was cleared up. Mr. Page gave the Commission copies of an August 6 letter to ICV, notifying them of a violation and voiding their permits, an August 10 reply from ICV, outlining work to be done to rectify the situation, and an August 13 letter from the Zonin- Administrator, who had written the first letter, replying to ICV's letter (copies attached). Krs. Doris Bailey said that last Tuesday the Natural Resources Committee, of which she is a member, had been told of violations by ICV and that the Zoning Administrator had been told of this. Mr. Fiona wanted it understood that the Commission had seen the letters and that their deliberations would be within the context of their knowledge of the letters. He felt that if, when the site inspection by the Zoning Administrator had been made, the situation were not satisfactory, any actions taken tonight would be void. The permits for construction of the buildings closest to the area of the violations were the only permits voided. Zx. Poger felt that if a developer were in violation on one area of his development, he should not be given permission for work on another area. Mr. Ewing felt that the steps outlined for correcting the situation would not rectify it, even after the work was done. He did not want to review the project until the permits .were reinstated, and said there was no doubt in his mind that there had been a gross violation of the zoning ordinance here. He felt a lot of work in that area had been done which was not necessary in order to build the buildings and he said that he felt the work had been intentionally done. Mr. Mona moved that the Planning Commission review the revised final plat of ICV subject to a satisfactory site inspection by the city Zoning Administrator, presently set for Friday, August 17, 19796 and the reinstatement of zoning permits g6664 and 6665. Mr. Woolery seconded the motion.. Mr. Woolery stated that he agreed with Mr. Ewing in the intent of what had been done, but said that he felt the project should be reviewed tonight. YX. Iona added that the Commission was not an enforcement body, and that they had to follow what the 'Zoning Administrator is doing, since he is responsible for enforcemen I:r. Poger felt the Commission had seen too many times when a developer told them he was going to do one thing and then did another. Mr. Levesque also noted that the chain on the emergency access was down again. Mr. Ewing felt the Commission should not consider further development by a person in violation of the ordinance. Mr. Mona felt that after the permits were reinstated, the Commission would just look at the plan then and said he would rather do it this evening. The motion failed with Messrs. Woolery and Mona voting aye. Yr. Sprayregen, representing Treetops, noted that it was the, condominium owners who kept removing the emergency access chain. Sketch plan review for 3 lot subdivision southeast of intersection of Route 116 and Van Sicklen Road Mr. Alan Palmer said that the lot contained 76.5 acres and that the owner, Dr. French, wanted to divide it into 4 parcels of land - 3 on Route 116 and the 100 N 82006'03" E / I10.00' SET CONC. M")N !�C 200.00_ I SET CONC. MON. 0— ` I I xo w z0) r c lLU cc, a r I 1 o Q I Z I TO Q > I Williston iston Rd.-� 2 19 + 35 60' RT y To T. H. D. MONS. To Dorset St. Kennedy Dr' '-2191-35 65' RT. o p6' 0-3 E N 82 S 8035'31"E 5.50' 1211.00' BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER,INC. I.P. EXISTING TOTAL PARCEL = 39.86 ACRES VOL. 104 PG. 419 -421 JUNE 30, 1972 z - m Q - I m a J I I o Or 1 Q rn 2 O N 3 > N I N I +I CID 1 1 N/F DANIEL J. a LEO O,BRIEN 1 VOL.48 PG, 45 W O,BRIENS TO FOREST PARK REALTY m VOL 88 PG.45 -N to 4 JAN., 1968 N OD 0 ao (n 1 1 I I.PIN EXISTING N/ F C. H. TILLY VOL. 56 o N "' PG. 438 ° I � I r` z Itot'- I I NI M 0 1 1 cD N CURVE DATA _ — -- VOL 109 PG. 168 M. NORTH BOUND 10110' G. M. P. R.O.W. 12 DEC. 1972 L = 230 39'30" LT - - - r -- --- — -- -- — -- -- --- �S_570 116 ' 17" W VT. H.D. MON. D = 10 00' VT. STATE GRID CO-ORDINATES 303,1i R = 5729.65' N 711 376 , 10 / L = 2365.83' E 324 672L�'s21 A0-6? �f VT. H.D. MON. LSE ONC.MON.1 �5 T = 1200.03' VT H.D. 0 200' 200MON. _S 87� 3, W - 568.72 1 O' L - 89 100 30- —__� _ =-89 _ 1998 + 55 1 S 87 03' I 2006+00 NORTH BOUND 2000+61.22 T.S. 2012+77.70 GRAPHIC SCALE r 200 100 0 200 400 600 80000p1F 11VE °°�n9i G co GOROON y :D r- I Certify this to be a correct Survey HARLOW Based on Information obtained from Town No. ] 54 Records, Ground Evidence a the Owner. G STER Q` S U R.4 Kirb Rd. L Ci1V v. INTE A11 AIRP o q _ a 0 A S\ r a e fir`\ O �R}e SOUT r- a z O z HVQ"ston Rd y N .a p BURLINGTON ,o m c 0 v ��edl 'Dr SITE LOCATION VICINITY MAP NOTE: ALL BEARINGS BASED ON TRUE NORTH; INFO. FROM INTERSTATE HIGHWAY PLANS, PROJECT* I - 89-3 ( 14) SHEET 15 of 125. INFORMATION ALONG INTERSTATE 89 NORTHERLY R.O.W. OBTAINED FROM VT. HIGHWAY DEPT. PROJECT # I-89-3 -(14) SHEETS 14 a 15 OF 125 INFORMATION ALONG KENNEDY DRIVE SOUTHERLY R.O.W. OBTAINED FROM VT. HIGHWAY DEPT. PROJECT *- U 528 -2- (2) SHEETS 44 a 45 OF 64. BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER, INC. (TWIN OAKS) PROPERTY SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT ENGINEERS INCORPORATED OF VERMONT P.O. BOX 2187 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT SURVEY L D Y. DESIGN APPROVED GGH CALC. T. M B DRAWN GGH DATE 5 - 3 - 74 CHECKED TRACED J S C SCALE I" = 200' PROJ. NO. 2811 SHEET OF s 0/7 -7 P/ -7 -7 %'"'.�✓i.v via i� r rl PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, _August 39 1977, at 7:30 p.m., to consider the following: Final plat application of Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc. to subdivide an existing 40 acre parcel into two lots of 4.8 and 35.1 acres each. The proposed subdivision is bounded on the south by lands of the State of Vermont, on the west by lands of Howard Er and and Arthur Bergner, on the north by Kennedy Drive, and on the east by lands of Aesculapius, Inc., Salisbury Realty Holdings, Inc., and Thelma Tilley. Final plat application of Twin Oaks Associate, -to develop a 180 unit apartment project on the aforementioned parcel of 35.1 acres. Copies of the these applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. notice to appear: Saturday, August 13, 1977 William B. Wessel, Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission ADMINISTRATIVE CHECKLIST PROJECT I1AME/FILE REFERENCE 1. LEr1ER OF NOTIFICATION & APPROVAL AOTION OR FINDINGS & ORDER 91&/77/ 11114177 I 2. BONDING OR ESCROW AGREEMENTS LANDSCAPING ER ♦ .`i ER NAGE DRAII • ROADS • CURBS ♦ SIDEWALKS (NOTE ALL RELEASES OR AGREEMENT REVISIONS) 3. LIST APPROVALS GRANTED' WITH DATES AND PERMITS GRANTED & SIT INSPECTIONS COMPLETED, ETC.:«.- 5 �� 4. +UTILITY EASEMENTS *, S PL&T 9�rbV 7 BILLS OF SALE -- �G� NL3 9 Ilzo'77 RECORDED ACCEPTED evbjtc�lir��'1'7 5. • CERTIFICATE OF TITLE x 6. •ROADJAYS DEMS FOR CITY STREETS ACCEPTED PRIVATE ROAD & WAIVER AGREEMENT x 7. •FINAL PLAT OR RECORD COPY - STAMPED SIGNED, & FILED OR RECORDED 8. •PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTS ACCEPTED & RECORDED FILED 9. MISCE_LL_NNEOUS AGRE:-MENTS LPI-D FOR ROAD WIDENING OFFER OF IRREVOCABLE DEDICATION • FUTURE ACCESS POINTS SY.r.RED ACCESS POINTS OTHER 3_0. COPY OF SURVEY TO ASSESSOR (IF CHANGE IN PROPERTY LINES) 11. FEEES - PAID/DATE HEARING` WP BUILDING PERMIT ENGIN=.. RING INSP. S r ,IER REECREATION (RECORD CALCUL :T IONS AND LF'PO S IT 111 �'CCOUi T ) .2. I :J CT FOLLO;i UP i.e., "ON LINE" EVALUATION: SCHOOL KIDS CAR COUl:TS Page Memo l.- Traffic - TWIN OAKS APAR DTIENTS Points of Discussion FINAL PLAT - 8/30/77 Agreed. 2.- Layout - Sheds: will be moved. Streets: see Szymanski memo. R.O.W.: will change. Turnaround: see Szymanski memo. Sidewalks: add walk on North. Pedestrian Easement: will be added. 3.- Landscaping - Reviewed with Russ Reay. 4.- Legal Documents - Prepared but awaiting changes at this meeting. Szymanski Memo l.- Sewer - Manholes o.k. 2.- Water - Lines, Valves, Shutoffs, all o.k. 3.- Streets - -)(A11 streets 27 feetY- All streets private. Natural drainage (California Systems) as detailec 8/29/77 SSP ) SUGGESTED MOTION OF APPROVAL - TWIN OAKS APARTMENTS I move that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat of Twin Oaks Associates, for development of a 35.1 acre parcel into 180 apartment units, as depicited on a plan set (11 pages) entitled "Site Plan - Twin Oaks Apartments..." dated 7/30/77, revised 8/17/77 drawn by Landplan, Inc., subject to the following stipulations. 1) Five fire hydrants are to be installed, as recommended by the Fire Chief. 2) The design and specifications of the temporary turn arounds, at the end of Phase I, the end of the city street, and the private street shall be as approved by the City Engineer. 3) A sidewalk, to city standards, shall be installed on the north side of the city street, extending from the existing sidewalk on Twin Oaks Terrace to cluster I; this sidewalk shall be shown on the{final plat. The sidewalk required for the balance of the city street is hereby waived. 4) A pedestrian easement shall be shown along the old rail- road bed right of way and within the powerline easement, extending from west to east property lines if consent of Green Mountain Power Corporation can be obtained) dTi`v,/1�E� yrEc� SQ__1K7,L. 5) The project shall be constructed in 3 phases, to be composed of 84 units (clurs I,II,III), 50 units (clusters IV & V), and 46 units (cluster Vp. 6) Landscaping plans shall be submitted to and approved by either the Tree Committee or County Forester prior to the issuance of building permits. Landscaping bonds, as required by the ord- inance shall be posted. 7) Pavement width and roadway ownership shall be properly delineated on the final plat; with the exception of the sidewalk as noted above, the city street shall be fully built to city stand- ards. 8) Layout and specifications for the private street shall be as approved by the City Engineer. 9) Sewer water, & storm drainage facilities, including detailed construction plans, shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of building permits. 10) A recreation fee of $9P70 shall be paid in proportion to the number of building permits issued, at the time of issuance. r t Sugge§ted Mction of Approval - Twin Oaks Apartments Page 11) Shed location shall be revised so as to provide a 30' clearance betweon buildings. 12) The final plat shall be reviewed by the Planning Assistant for conformity with these stipulations, prior to recording. 13) The necessary legal documentation i.e., escrow and private road agreements, deeds for utility and pedestrian easements, and streets, shall be submitted to the City Attorney 30 days prior to issuance of building permits. tjK &- 1/71-Pz //0P�6 14) This approval expires 6 months from t44dame; This approval expires 12 months front this date for phase II (and 18 months from this date for phase III). 15) Prior to issuing building or land development permits for phase II or III, the commission may find, after a duly warned public hearing, that the construction of the proposed phase will exceed the city's ability to provide adequate sewage disposal, educational, and highway services due to the anticipated residents in the phase proposed, and may alter or rescind its approval as based on these findings. M E M 0 R A N D U 'M TO: SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: STEPHEN PAGE, PLANNING ASSISTANT RE: FINAL PLAT - TWIN OAKS APARTMENTS DATE: AUGUST 26, 1977 With the exception of traffic all impacts of this project have been completed. The issues which remain to be resolved are primarily layout details. Memos from Jim Gaudette and Bill Szymanski are forthcoming on fire protection and engineering. The project has been reduced in size from 196 units to 180; the recreation fee is reduced proportionately to $9870. 1 recommend three phases so as to be in conformity with the other projects recently approved. CZ ?*bbV_55 ) 1) Traffic - Based on estimates of traffic volume and assumptions about traffic origin used for other recently approved projects in the area, the two nearest intersections (116 and Kennedy Drive, Dorset Street and Kennedy Drive) have adequate capacity for this project. Regional Planning traffic counts from November, 1974 show, that at the evening peak hour, the approaches to these inter- sections are operating at V/C ratios ranging from .23 to .60; with the additional traffic from Twin Oaks, ICV, 435 Dorset, and Brand, these ratios would increase to an approximate range of .38 to .91. 2) Layout - The location of sheds should be slightly altered so as to provide adequate clearance between adjacent buildings. Due to a misunderstanding, the city street previously agreed to is not fully delineated on the plat;pavement width and road ownership should be shown on a revised plan. The extension of the right of way to the Brand property should be revised on the plan, as well as an easement shown for the Bergiser lot. In addition, a turn around of some sort should be shown at the end of the City street (southeast corner of the property). Internal walkways throughout the project are proposed in lieu of a sidewalk paralleling the city street. I feel this is a good idea, with the exception of the street north of the Tennis Center, where a sidewalk should parallel the pavement.,,.. I have suggested a pedestrian easement along the southern edge of the property, which the applicant has tentatively agreed to. Such a path would link the Brand and Tilley properties and extend along the old railroad bed, within the powerline right of way. 3) Landscaping - Preservation of existing vegetation and - 2 - proposed plantings should be reviewed by either the Tree Committee or the County Forester. Such a review could be a condition of approval. 4) Legal Documents - Because of layout changes which are as yet unresolved, final documents are not completed. When these changes are decided upon, these agreements can be resolved administratively. Cl M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Twin Oaks Apartments Date: August 26, 1977 Streets: 1. City streets must be 30' in width with concrete curbs and a drainage collection system. 2. End of city street must be provided with a turn -around. 3. Private street should be provided with a turnaround. 4. Private street should include curbs and a drainage system 5. The existing concrete sidewalk must be extended to cluster one along the north side of the access road. Sewers: 1. Manhole shall be placed at connection to existing sewer. 2. Maximum spacing of manholes shall be 300 feet. Water: 1. Water line shall be installed outside of road and parallel to it. 2. Additional valves will be required. 3. House shut -offs shall be within'the road R.O.W. or within the water main easements. 4. Water main shall be looped to Kennedy Drive. NOTE: Detail construction plans shall be submitted for review prior to construction. Respectfully s mitted. ZLV William J. Szymanski, City Manager A. Judson Babcock Valley Professional Center Waitsfield, Vermont 05673 802-496-2580 5/5/77 POINTS OF DISCUSSION - PRELIMINARY PROPOSAL TWIN OAKS APARTMENTS 1. Streets - to be private, having 60 feet reserved Thirty feet wide including three foot shoulders. Buildings set back 30' from 60' reserve line. 2. Storm Drainage - curbs and catch basins not necessar due to natural site drainage. 3. Deeding of Facilities to City - street and pump station will be deeded according to phasing. 4. Phasing - request of first phrase will be modified to meet City Growth Policy in conjunction with front end costs and amenities. 5. Recreation Fee - reserve right to discuss with City Council. g14,�nr-7 sSP Suggested Motion of Approval for Twin Oaks Apartments I move that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the Preliminary Plat of A. Judson Babcock, for 196 apartment units, as depicted on a elan entitled "Twin Oaks Apartments. . . Prelimin- ary Plat, A. Judson Babcock & Burlington Indoor Tennis, Inc." dated 2/18/77, revised 3/21 and 4/6,19,427/77, prepared by T.H.A. Inc. and P.B.A. Inc., subject to the following stipulations: 1) a final determination on traffic impact shall be made by the Commission during final plat review. Zr7/ i 2) the outlines of the paved road surface, (z'' eet wide) shall be sh wn on the final plat. 3 curbing; location and specifications shall be as approved by the City Engineer and shown on the final plat. 4) a storm drainage system shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. 5) the final plat shall show all walkways between buildings and parking areas. `�N,{ Qr=ofit�t' wp,1�• Do.1_o Tt+ 6) ownership of the roadwaylshall be publickr .a- 7) all subsequent submissions shall be on plans indicating approved building locations. 8) a temporary cul-de-sac shall be required at the terminus of the phase I roadway, in accord with the recommendations of the City Engineer on layout and specifications ,bqt> 9) the following requests for waivers are approved: die -ems, G+m- , , temporary field markers. 11) warning for the final plat hearing will occur only after applicant has complied with the applicable conditions of this approval and final plat required submissions. Suggested Motion of Approval for Burlington Indoor Tennis Ctr. I move that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the preliminary plat of Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, for sub- division of a parcel of 39.9 acres into two lots of 35.1 and 4.8 acres, as depicted on a plan entitled "Twin Oaks Apartments . Preliminary Plat, A. Judson Babcock & Burlington Indoor Tennis, Inc." dated 2/18/77, revised 3/21 and 4/6, 19, & 27/77, prepared by T.H.A. Inc. and P.B.A. Inc.,subject to the following stipulations: 1) the deed for the property to be transferred to the City, including Twin Oaks Terrace, g s n, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to final plat approval. The draft of such a deed shall be submitted to the City Attorney 15 days prior to the final plat public hearing. RAM l404 ca_F eAAWar 2) warning for the final plat hearing with the above stipulation plus final plat required submissions. -2- III. TWIN OAKS - PRELIMINARY PLAT 1) A list of waivers requested is enclosed. The most important ones are: private ownership of roads, 24' ppvement width, and no curbs or storm sewers. 2) With exception of waivers, all requested changes relating to plat layout and engineering have been complied with. 3) The applicant has indicated his project will generate traffic on the order of .75-1.00 trips per unit (2 way) during peak road- way hours, which is comparable to similar projects in the neighbor- hood, existing and proposed. Preliminary indications are that this project's traffic cab be absorbed at the two nearest intersections. I could prefer to delay a final determination on traffic until Bruce Houghton can complete an analysis of the Kennedy Drive area, taking into account other approved and proposed projects. Because Bruce has been unavailable until this time to conduct such a review, I suggest that this factor not delay consideration of the preliminary plat. 4) At the hearing, the applicant should indicate in which phase the proposed site improvements (such as utilities, roads, walks, pool, etc.) will be completed. 5) The recreation fee works out to be $10,747. A. Judson Babcock Valley Professional Center Waitsfield, Vermont 05673 802-496-2580 LIST OF WAVERS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMISSION Twin Oaks Apartments, South Burlington, Vt. 05401 4/27/77 * 1. Proposed finished grades not shown. Cuts of 5'-0" or more and fills of 1'-O" or more indicated on preliminary storm drainage drawing dated 4/27/77• * 2. Details of connections to existing water and sewer services not shown. * 3. Temporary field markers not placed. 4. All streets will be privately owned and maintained with the exception of area shown on preliminary plat dated 4/27/77• * 5. Interior walkways to building not shown on preliminary plat. A 12'-0" clearance is shown to allow for parking bumpers, walks and snow storage. 6. Storm drainage system will be as indicated on plan. Storm sewers and catch basins and curbs are not proposed. * Information to be shown on final plat. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Twin Oaks Date: April 8, 1977 Water 1. Loop water main northerly to Kennedy Drive 2. Designate location of Tilley property to the east and designate a R.O.W. for future water main loop to the east. 3. Add two more hydrants. 4. Metering, service connections, valuing, service size to be designated by the City Water Department. 5. Supply engineering data on required fire flow. Sewers 1. Pumping station shall remain private. 2. Maximum manhole spacing shall be 300'. 3. Supply engineering data on flow. Roads 1. Minimum road width shall be 30'. 2. Minimum distance between parking area and greenbelt shall be 30'. 3. Road and parking areas should include curbing and a drainage system. 4. A walkway should be included in front of the parking areas. 5. Cluster entrances shall have a width of 30'. 6. An emergency entrance from Aesculapius shall be provided. 7. Supply engineering data on anticipated runoff and culvert sizes. Respectfully submitted, William J. Szymanski, City Manager MEMORA NDURI TO: SOUTH BU ,LINGTON PLANNING COI�`VIISSION FROM: STEPHEN PAGE, PLANNING ASSISTANT RE: Tl'%I N OAKS DATE: APRIL 8, 1977 I am awaiting further information on the following: 1) suggestions on erosion control measures from the soil conservation service. G) improved traffic analysis 3) changes to the plat reflecting the discussions at the previous meeting Calculations for recreation land/equivalent fee will be ready prior to the meeting. I will be meeting with Bruce Houghton prior to the meeting to discuss the feasibility of the road link to Rte 116. I suggest review be conducted according to the general and specific standards for RPUD review. M E M O R A N D U 11 TO: SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COD'MISSION FROM: STEPHEN PAGE, PLANNING ASSISTANT RE: PRELIMINARY PLAT - TWIN OAFS DATE: "-LARCH 18, 1977 This proposal entails two concurrent applications (as in the case of Horizon Heights): one, from. Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc. to set off a lot of 35 acres, and the other from A.J. Babcock, to develop 196 apartment units on that lot. The applicable reviews for this proposal are major subdivision, site plan, RPUD, and private right of way, all of which can occur simultaneously. I suggest a review format based on the general and specific standards for RPUD review. The following comments are arranged in order of those standards: I. General Standards l- 2. water - is being reviewed for adequate pressure, "looping", etc. by Fire Chief and City Engineer. 3. Erosion - I question the proximity of buildings in clusters 1 & 6 to steep slopes. The advice of the Soil Conservation Service in this regard may be helpful. Also, a preliminary storm drainage plan and proposed contours should be sub- mitted. 4. Highways - the applicant should submit information on traffic impact. The deed to -win Oaks Terrace should be submitted. A right of way from this road to the two abuttors to the west, Brand and Bergner, should be pro- vided. The Commission should consider requiring limited, emergency access to the Fast, such as to Tilley and/or Aesculapius. A cul-de-sac should he considered for the end of Twin Oaks Terrace, to serve school buses, snowplows, etc. 5. Schools - we are waiting for a response frQrn. the School Board. The applicant appeared beforethem some weeks ago. 6. Municipal Facilities - this project will be subject to the pending growth and recreation policies, on which the applicant should be kept fully informed. 7. Aesthetics - the landscaping plan, when submitted, should address the question of aesthetics. The advice of the County Forester would also be helpful in this regard, -2- to give us a realistic expectation of what existing trees can and should be saved. 13. Timetable - the applicant should submit a phasing schedule, to include dates and number of phases, and number of units and other improvements in each phase. Also, buildings should be numbered, and the number of units in each building should be shown. II. .Other Comments 1. Applicant should explore possibilities for dedicated rec- reation land, in conjunction with the Prand project, to the west of the tennis center. 2. Internal walkways, such as cluster 6 to pool to cluster 1, would be desirable. Thy sidewalk along the access road has not been relocated as suggested at sketch plan review. 3. Outdoor lighting should be shown. 4. Does the Tennis Center plan to terminate access from the end of Twin Oaks Terrace to the outdoor courts? If not, an ease- ment should be submitted or the proposed lot lines should be changed. A, 1L �trr Prpartmrnt �P t�II�Sr P�'S DORSET STREET OFFICE OF CHIEF ENGINEER 863-6455 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. MARCH 16, 1977 Mr. William B. Wessel Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Wessel, After reviewing the preliminary plans on the Twin Oaks apartment complex the following should be done so that the fire department can give proper fire protection. 1. All roads must be at least 26 feet wide for fire apparatus. 2. Road should connect cluster 1 and cluster 6. 3. Buildings should be 30 feet apart on side and 60 feet behind building from other buildings. 4. Main water line should be tied in a second way.If possible from timber lane. If there are any questions on the above please feel free to call me at 863-6455. Sincerely James W. Goddette Sr Chief r V M E M O R A N D U M To: Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Development Plan Twin Oaks Apartments Date: January 21, 1977 0 Sidewalk at Tennis Center should be along the north side of access road. WJS/h 2. Sidewalk to be constructed along the road R.O.W. line and continue along the loop. 3. Cluster No. 6 should be revised so that the loop road has limited access. The layout as shown will make snow removal extremely difficult. 4. The layout of clusters is such that only one vehicle per dwelling unit has a parking area. Guests or additional vehicles per unit will have to park in the loops causing a problem for emergency vehicles. Snow removal will also be a problem. Street should be public, built to city standards,c and maintained by the city. 6. This project is expected to generate approximately 60,000 gallons of sewage per day. Respectfully submitted, William J. Szymanski City Manager 14EM0RA NDUPi TO: PLANNING COMISSION FR,)I : STEPHEN PAGE, PLANNING ASSISTANT RE: TWIN OAKS APARTMENTS SKETCH PLAN DATE: JANUARY 21, 1977 This pro osal is very similar to the one presented (and later dropped by Peter Bergh about 18 months ago. This project entails the selling off of two lots, one of 4.86 A for the tennis facility, and the balance of 35 A for the apartment project (zct� L-�HLTS,. The follor.•ing issues should be considered: access -,-This proposal should not be approved until the deed for Twin'Oaks Terrace has been accepted by the City. Access with the t%,R abutting parcels to the west, and with property to the east should be provided; such access would eliminate unwanted curb cuts on Kennedy Drive and would enhance the safety and circulation of the proposed project. Data on traffic generation, and roadway and intersection capacity will be forthcoming. municipal facilities - The impact on the school system and sewage treatment plant must be assessed; the impact on other facilities, such as recreation, police, water, fire, etc., where there appears to be less of a "crunch", will also be reviewed. open space and recreation - The developable land on the site is being very intensively used; steep slopes, drainageways, and swampland constitute the open space on this project; the applicant should explain the provisions being made for open soace and recreation, such as tennis, swimming, pedestrian trails, ballfields, etc. 0 MEMORANDUM TO: SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: RICHARD WARD, ZONING ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER RE: TWIP; OAKS DATE: JANUARY 21, 1977 1) Area zoned R-7 and C. 0. District. Density allowed (35 acres) 21+5 units, 200 units are proposed. 2) Private streets are proposed, at this time that section of Twin Oaks Drive off Kennedy Drive remains private. This should be deeded to the City, reasons are, tennis center property (5 acres) should have street frontage off a public street and land owned by Erand and Bergner should also front on Twin Oaks Drive. 3) Plan as proposed does not show open space or recreation land, other than the brook and a swamp near Kennedy Drive - 15% recreation area/open space should be considered. 4) Consideration should be given to connect proposed — road to Timber Lane. 5) A more detailed plan showing parking and landscaping should be submitted for preliminary plat review. 6) Those units which are near G.M.P. right-of-way are Y located within the Interstate set -back. 11/8/77 SSP SUGGESTED MOTION OF APPROVAL - REVISED FINAL PLAT of Twin Oaks Associates I move that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the revised final plat of Twin Oaks Associates, for 184 apartment units as depicted on a plan entitled, "Site Plan - Twin Oaks Apartments"...., dated 7/30/77, revised 8/17, 10/12, & 10/20/77, drawn by Landplan, Inc., subject to the following stipulations; 1) The recreation fee is increased, proportionately, to a total of t1*j@$J for i RIB, units. 2) The tree phase$des cribnd in condition #5 of the 9/13/77 final plat annro v-il ar- amended to include 80,56, rvnd 48 units respectively. 3) This approval su plements the stipulations of final plat approval Obtained 9/13/77. VOTTQ,�% V, 51 dIL102 VJfr [.dwT tP," rs A :x1iWalloa Ctrj- 04 4,)r Iq Jr) M E ICI 0 R A N D U To: Curt Carter, District Environmental Coordinator From: Steve Pace, Planning Assistant, City- of South Burlington Re: Stipulation on A250 permits for `win Oaks and ICV apartment Protects Date: October 1S, 1977 A. Twin Oaks 14 We support the use of all water conserving devices as this will reduce the volume of waste to be treated at the Airport Parkway Sewage treatrqent plant. 2. We support the rearrangement of buildings which saves significant vegetation - a local review will be done to ensure that there are no conflictes in layout resulting from this change 3. We ask that subsequent review of school, road, and sewer system capacities for phases !I and III be conducted by the District Commission onlv if unforeseen circumstances arise and only if the City requests such a review.' 4. We request stipulations compatible with the follo;,*ing schedule (per local subdivision approval): - Phase I construction to begin prior to 7/1/78 and to be completed by 1/1/79. - Phase II construction to begin betl:een 1/l/79 ;nd 7/1/79 and completion by l/1/80. - Phase III construction to becin between 1/1/30 and 7/1/80 and completion by 1/1/81. o ICV 1. We ask that subsequent review of school, road, and sewer system capacities for phase II "be conductod b the District Com- mission only if unforseen circumstances arise and only if the City requests such a review. 2. request stipulations compatible with the following schedule (per local subdivision app-roval) : - Phase I constructi-m to becin prior to 3/27/78 and to be completed by 1/l/79. - Phase II construction to becin bet-.­�_n 1/l/7: anc 7/1/79 and to b77 1/1/31. I II CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT Name of Applicant 6 F--.091-t} Name of Subdivision �✓ IAl /u� 101-176 III Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, sur- veyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat application: MVMMWM �AWW� V f% r/141 IV Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application V Attach a final plat drawing (originals not needed) showing the following information: (1) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title, the name and address of the record owner and subdivider, the name, license number and seal of the licensed land surveyor, the boundaries of the subdivision and its general location in relation to existing streets or other land marks, scale (numerical and graphic), date and true north arrow. (2) Street names and lines, pedestrial ways, lots, reservations, easements, and areas to be dedicated to public use. (3) Sufficient data acceptable to the City Engineer to determine readily the location, bearing and length of every street line, lot line, boudary line and to reproduce such lines upon the ground. Where applicable these should be tied to reference points previously established by the city. l i -2- (4) The length of all straight lines, the deflection angles, radii, length of curves and central angles of all curves, tangent distances and tangent bearings for each street. (5) By property designation on such Plat, all public space for which offers of cession are made by the subdivider and those spaces title to ;which is reserved by him. (6) Lots within the subdivision numbered in numerical order within blocks, and blocks lettered in alphabetical order. (7) The location of all o.-LE the imaprovements referred to in Section 301.1*and in adcition thereto the location of all utility poles, sewage disposal systems, ',.rater supply systems and rough grading and other eevices and imethods of draining the area affecting the subldivision. �-�{ �p�rik 3�et�, sv�n�v►s1c�} jai. (8) Permanent reference monuments sho-.:al thus: " �" and lot corner marhers shown thus: "O". (9) Construction dra,;ings of all :. -equired i--qproverlents. VI -"nclose supporting documents listed belo.7 or request that they be requiree as a condition of final plat approval: (1) Copies of proposed deeds, agreements or other 6ocu.,:nts showing the manner in which open space, including park and recreational areas and school site areas, are to be dedicated, reserved and maintained and a certificate of I he City Attorney that these ,documents are satisfactory. (2) A certificate of the City Dn. ineer as to the satisfactory completion of all improvements recauiree by the Commission, or, in lieu of any required i=rovements not so completed, a perfor-mance bond to secure completion of such improvements and their maintenance for a period of two years, and written evidence that the Citv Council is satisfied either with the bonding or surety company or with security furnished by the subdivider. (3) A copy of such covenants or dead restrictions as are in- tended to cover all or part of the tract. (4) A prospectus describing the management organization if one is required. (5) In the case of a subdivision or development served by a privately owned and/or maintained street:. (a) a copy of all proposed deeds, agreements, or other doctunnents which convey or relate to the use of a privately owned street or right--of-way, and a certi- ficate of the City Attorney that these documents are satisfa-tory. -3- (b) a completed contract between the lanoo:mer and the city regarding the number of lots or dwelling units to be served by the proposed right-of-;oay or private .street and the responsibility for the roadwav maint- enance, along with a certificate of the Ci'_-r �ttornev that the contract is satisfactorv. (signature) applicant or contact person 'ate CITY OF SOU H BURLINGTON APPLICAyIiN FOR A DEVELM(IENTT CR SU✓DIVISI0I14 P E 11TT 1. Applicant's Name, Address, and Phone Number 802-496-2580 A. JUDSON BABCOCK, VALLEY PROFESSIONAL CENTER, WAITFIELD 4-1-3t 2:4, VERMONT, 05673 2. Name, Address, and Phone I -;umber of the Person ;:'Y:om+ the Commission should contact regarding this Application A. JUDSON BABCOCK (Same address as above) 3. Nature of the Development or Subdivision Multi -family, rental apartments 4. Location of Development or Sutdivision Off Kennedy Drive Adjacent to Twin Oaks Tennis Centre, see location map on survey enclosed 5. High and Low Elevations or the Tract of Land involved with the Development or Subdivision Lowest elevation 263.25' above mean sea level. Highest elevation 320.00' above mean sea level 6. Address of each of the Applicant's Offices in Vermont 7. Same as above Item No. 1 Applicant's Legal Interest in the Property (Free Sicple, Option, Etc.) - Presently under option 2/9/77 - 2 - 8. If the Applicant is not an individual, the Form, Date, and Place of Formation of the Applicant FORM: �. DATE: PI��CE • 9. Estimated Cost, Exclusive of Land Cost of the Development (Applicant for a Subdivision Deed Not Lswer) $4,500,000 10. Application for a Subdivision, the Number of Lots NOT APPLICABLE 11. What Restrictive Covenants are Planned for any Deed(s) to be issued? NOT APPLICABLE 12. Description of the Proposed Development of Subdivision - - A. Plans and Specifications: (1) Attach a detailed plat or blot plan of the proposed project drawn to scale, showing the location and dimensions of the entire tract. This plan should also show: all lots, streets, roads, water lines, sewage systems, drain systems, buildings, existing or intended. (2) In subdivisions where individual water and sewa:-e facilities are intended, indicate the proposed location(s). (3) Show all easements, parks, playgrounds, parking areas, water courses, and other bodies of water, natural or artificial, existing or intended. (4) Include a contour roan of the land involved drawn on a scale of 5 foot contour intervals. (5) Indicate on the plans the location and width of any easements for utilities, roads, etc., exist- ing or intended. Attach a written explanation of any such easements. -3- 13. What is the purpose of this Subdivision or Development and What is the intended use of the land after Subdivision or Development? To develop and construct multi -family rental housing 14. Describe the Site of the Proposed Development or Subdivis- ion including information, if available, on Soils Streams or Other -bodies of Water,i'edrocks, Etc. Soils within the proposed developed areas are primary sandy with no ledge or high water table evident 15. Acreage: A. Number of acres owned, or in which you have a legal interest 35f B. Number of acres in this project 35 acres C. Number of acres previously developed 4.8 f acres" D. When do you anticipate beginning the project Spring 1977 E. - When Summer will this development or fall of 1979 or subdivision be completed 16. Water System: A. What type of water system is to be provided, such as: Individual system on each lot, co=unity system, municipal system, etc. The extension of an 8" 0 municipal service from Twin Oaks Road B. Where is the nearest municipal water system and is it available and feasible to use it? See above. Item 16A, it is available and feasible 17. Sewage System: - - A. What type of sewage disposal system is to be provided or intended, such as: Individual system on each lot, community system, or municipal system? Municipal system w.-= B. Where is.'he nearest coca+:,unity sewage systems, and is it available and feasible to use it? Twin Oaks Road it is available and feasible C. If the sewage system is other than a co= unity, municipal, or individual lot septic tares and leaching field, include competent professional engineering evidence that it will perform satisfactorily. 18. Adjacent Property: A. List below the names and addresses of adjacent property owners. Aesculapius Med. Ctr. Forest Park Condo Assoc., C.H. Tilly, Vt. Dept. Highways I89, Howard Bank, Arthur Berger B. What is the adjacent property used for at present? Highway, condo's, undeveloped meadow C. What is the future usage intended for the.zdjacent property? Possible multifamily 19. Zoning: A. Which District or Districts is the proposed site with- in according to the official zoning nap of the City? R 7 DA TE_ SIGNATIIP.E _:L Fit. : nLw_A_ . TWIN OAKS ASSOCIATE.. ..._..r .H.A. , INC., ROUTE 10� WAITSFIELD, VERMONT 05673___ March 22, 1978 Mr. William Szymanski, Chief Executive Officer City of South Burlington South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Sir: RECEIVED IVIAI'NAC_..'' t'?i S OFFICE CITY So. OFFICE I have submitted and HUD is considering a proposal to develop housing in your jurisdiction under the Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments Program for New Construction. The Proposal numbered 026-35007-PM consists of twenty units at Twin Oaks Apartments, Kennedy Drive. The proposed construction would include the following units: No. of D.U.'S BY BEDROOM COUNT Building Types Nonelderly TOTAL DU'S 1-BR 2-BR 3-BR 4-BR 5-BR 6-BR Semi-detached 14 6 20 Pursuant to Section 213(c) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, HUD must determine whether or not there is a need for such housing assistance, taking into consideration any applicable State Housing Assistance Plan, and that there is or will be available in the area public facilities and services adequate to serve the housing proposed to be assisted. An application may be approved only if this determination is in the affirmative. The review criteria to be considered by your unit of government are outlined in Subpart C, Applications for Housing Assistance Plans, of the regulations in 24 CFR Part 891, Review of Applications for Housing Assistance published in the Federal Register August 23, 1976. We invite you to submit to HUD all comments or information your unit of government deem relevant to our determination. While HUD will not be bound by any such comments or information, all relevant comments or information you provide will be considered. HUD will consider only comments or information from you received no later than 30 days after the date of this letter. If your unit of government does not intend to submit any comments or information, please so notify HUD as soon as possible so that they may expedite the making of their determination. S'n erel , Twin ks Associates /cm Wk TTWIPWRK f ` City of South Burlington 1175 WILLISTON ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 �. �,•� TEL. 863-2891 March 29, 1978 U.S. Department of housing & Urban Develonment Federal Building Elmwood Avenue Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: 026-35007-PM Dear Sir or Madam: We do not intend to submit any co",Lments or information on the above referenced project. Yours truly, William J. Szymanski City Manager WS/mcg cc: Mr. Judson Babcock N 82006' 03" E I10'00' _- SET CONC. MON. aoo �" r SET CONC. MON W 60 Z a 0 m o d a l 1 oMo 0 e a:O Q 7 I.P. PI ING Conc. Man. Q M 50 a. � 1 I o -T i a rn a 3 o 0 Z ] aN ►I O Q N O I •rnC fr—�....--�""'��- To w i11 iston Rd �.�— 219 + 35 60' RT T. M.D. MONS . ,..* , To Dorset St' 1 Uf. �'-21 9 +- 35 65' RT. Kennedy p.6 03'E 8201iN�S 8035'31"E 5.50 0 12110' BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER, INC. VOL. 104 PAGE 419- 421 ✓UNE 30, 1972 PARCEL NO. 2 35./ ? ACRES 60 44 p Op : ROAD AR3014 58 E PARCEL NO. 1 4.8 t Acres ' N/F DANIEL J. 8 LEO O,BRIEN i VOL. 48 PG. 45 ul O,BRIENS TO FOREST PARK REALTY -m VOL 88 PG 45 -N 00 4 JA N , 1968 N Co a 10 1 G. M. R R.O.W. VOL109 PG. 168 12 DEC. 1912 7: 161 1 VT STATE GRID CO-ORDINATES , 1 +', 3033 N 71 i 376 . 10 E 324 672.21 S-TAo'51 g VT H.D. MON. I PIN EXISTING i ! Kir Rd. v ! f Y. INTE r V AIRP O !! 0 1 U. S. Rio. 2 Rd m 1 SOUT o o BURLINGTON c % X _ � • o a m z 0to lb O ; 1? Z ,1 / W. a ION VICINITY MAP NOTE: ALL BEARINGS BASED ON "TRUE NORTH, INFO. FROM INTERSTATE HIGHWAY PLANS, PROJECT* L- 89-3 ( 14) SHEET 15 of 125. N/ F C.H. TILLY VOL.. 56 PG 438 INFORMATION ALONG INTERSTATE 89 NORTHERLY R.O.W. pBTAiNED FROM VT HIGHWAY DEPT. PROJECT #,! I-89-3 -(14) SHEETS 14 815 OF 125 INFORMATION ALONG KENNEDY DRIVE SOUTHERLY R.O.W. OBTAINED FROM VT HIGHWAY DEPT. PROJECT * U 528 - 2 - (2) SHEETS 44 8 45 OF 64 CURVE DATA L NORTH BOUND b = 230 39'30" LT. VT. H.D. MON D = 10 00' R = 5729, 65' L = 2365.83' A61 T = 12nn n3' 200 W Zoo' VT H.D. MON _ L-89 _ - 89 _ PT .__-_ 199 8 + 55 2006+0 W _ NORTH BOUND 2000+61.22 ,--------- 0 T.S. 2012+77 70 GRAPHIC SCALE 200 too 0 200 4DO 'moo Z Certify this to be a correct Survey Based on Information obtained from Town Records, Ground Evidence a the Owner. GORDON G. * HARLOW No. 154a Tfvj�t� BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER, INC. (TWIN OAKS) PROPERTY Proposed to be transfered to Others SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT ENGINEERS INCORPORATED OF VERMONT PO. BOX 2187 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT SURVEY L D Y DESIGN APPROVED GGH CALC. T M 8 DRAWN GG;H DATE FE6. 7, 1977 CHECKED TRACED J S C SCALE I' = wo' PROJ. NO. 4/99 SHEET / OF / w- M E M O R A N D U M To: Planning Commission Re: Twin Oaks Apartments, Kennedy Drive From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Date: March 18,1977 1. Have received no response to the recommendations in the memo of January 21, 1977. 2. The water supply to a development of this size is inadequate. 3. Development should have a storm drain system. 4. It appears that in order to construct some of the units extensive filling will be required. 5. If a sewage pumping station is installed as shown it should remain private. 6. Detailed engineering plans shall be prepared by a registered engineer. Respectfully submitted, William J. zy anski, City Manager T\%.,tK O&cs Red Tape Form - Circulation Zoning Administrator Planning Assistant City PY,anager (Engineer) Fire Chief Police Chief School Directors Recreation Director City Attorney Transportation Engineer (RPC) Natural Resources Comm. Tree Planting Comm. Other c ro • � ca m E p• 3 > > m U •'i ri a1 O O -P C r-1 +-) M-P N •rf N N O M N co CM +-) > _ F�: O. Q. C io � .SC 1-4 P4 � •r" •rl N O 0- 0- O .0 +� co P. 0. rl, E—I P1 cn Q: a Q G, Q N U O ✓ = no adverse comment x = memo enclosed >C� O F4- tae,-Ow ct-) -rwL$4 8PELVA, -- 1J I �i Lei ���C— Imo• ����� / 1 � 1 M E M 0 R A N D D M To: Planning Commission Re: Twin Oaks Apartments, Kennedy Drive From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Date: March 18,1977 1. Have received no response to the recommendations in the memo of January 21, 1977. 2. The water supply to a development of this size is inadequate. 3. Development should have a storm drain system. 4. It appears that in order to construct some of the units extensive filling will be required. 5. If a sewage pumping station is installed as shown it should remain private. 6. Detailed engineering plans shall be prepared by a registered engineer. Respectfully submitted, �ttl,�.t,Q,,,,_ • William J. zy anski, City Manager MEMORANDUM TO: SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: RICHARD WARD, ZONING ADMINIS'?'RATOR RE: TWIN OAKS, APARTMENTT PLAN, PRELIMINARY PLAT RFVIFW DATE: 14ARCH 18, 1977 1. This plan does not conform to Section 203.1 subsection (A) of the City Subdivision Regulations. Particularly_ concerned with the scale of the drawing, unable to check the plan for conformity to zoning regulations, i.e., parking vs. number of units. 2. This plan does not conform to the procedures under 24 V.S.A., Section 4417 (5), in a memorandum from Attorney Richard Spokes dated February 18, 1977 he rakes mention that the proposed park land be suitable for development into playgrounds or other recreational uses. 3. Recommend that alternative means of ingress and egress be provided. 4. Private roads are proposed at 30 feet. A right-of-wav of 60 feet minimum should be provided for possible future conversion to public streets. 5. Set -backs of proposed dwellings should be a minimum of 30 feet from street line. M E M O R A N D U M TO: SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING CO1MISSION FROM. STEPHEN PAGE, PLANNING ASSISTANT RE- PRELIMINARY PLAT - TWIN OAKS DATE. "LARCH 18, 1977 This proposal entails tl,70 concurrent applications (as in the case of Horizon Heights): one, from. Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc. to set off a lot of 35 acres, and the other from A.J. Babcock, to develop 196 apartment units on that lot. The applicable reviews for this proposal are major subdivision, site plan, RPUD, and private right of way, all of which can occur simultaneously. I suggest a review format based on the general and specific standards for RPUD review. The following comments are arranged in order of those standards; I. General Standards 2. Water - is being reviewed for adequate pressure, "looping", etc. by Fire Chief and City Engineer. 3. Erosion - I question the proximity of buildinas in clusters 1 & 6 to steep slopes. The advice of the Soil Conservation Service in this regard may be helpful. Also, a preliminary storm drainage plan and proposer contours should. be sub- mitted. 4. Higiways - the applicant should submit information on traffic impact. The deed to '7X,7in Oaks Terrace should be submitted. A right of way from this road to the two abuttors to the west, Brand and Bergner, should be pro- vided. The Commission should. consider requiring_ limited, emergency access to the Fast, such as to Tilley and/or Aesculapius. A cul-de-sac should be considered for the end of Twin Oaks Terrace, to serve school buses, snowplows, etc. 5. Schools - we are waiting for a response frdin the School Board. The applicant appeared. beforethem some weeks ago. 6. Municipal Facilities - this project will be subject to the pending growth and recreation policies, on which the applicant should be kept fully informed. 7. Aesthetics -- the landscaping plan, when submitted, should address the question of aesthetics. The advice of the County Forester would also be helpful in this regard, 1 - 2-. to give us a realistic expectation of what existing trees can and should be saved. 13. Timetable - the applicant should submit a phasing schedule, to include dates and number of phases, and number of units and other improvements in each phase. .Also, buildinc_7s should be numbered., and the number of units in each building should be shown. II. _Other Comments 1. Applicant should explore possibilities for dedicated rec- reation land, in conjunction with the Brand nr_oject, to the west of the tennis center. 2. Internal walkways, such as cluster_ 6 to pool to cluster 1, would be desirable. Thy;. sidewalk along the access road has not been relocated as suggested at sketch plan review. 3. Outdoor lighting should he shown. 4. Does the Tennis Center plan to terminate access from the end of Twin Oaks Terrace to the outdoor courts? If not, an ease- ment should be submitted or the proposed lot lines should be changed. A. Judson Babcock Valley Professional Center Waitsfield, Vermont 05673 802-496-2580 TWIN OAKS APARTMENTS SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT UNIT TYPES CLUSTER ONE B.R. TWO B.R. THREE B.R. TOTAL #1 6 16 8 30 #2 6 12 12 30 #3 6 24 0 30 #4 8 10 10 28 #5 6 16 8 30 #6 0 24 24 48 UNITS 32 102 62 196 x1 x2 x3 BEDROOMS 32 204 186 422 //Z 5" /% % BUILDINGS 3-10 3-10 3-10 2-10 1-8 3-10 6-8 21 PUBLIC NOTICE SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COWIISSION SUBDIVISION HEARING The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 1175 Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, March 22, 1977 at 7:30 p.m. to consider the following: Preliminary plat application of Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc. to subdivide an existing 40 acre parcel into two lots of 4.8 and 35.1 acres each. The proposed subdivision is bounded on the south by lands of the State of Vermont, on the west by lands of Howard Brand and Arthur Bergner, on the north by Kennedy Drive, and on the east by lands of Aesculapius, Inc., Salisbury Realty Holdings, Inc., and Thelma Tilley. Preliminary plat application of A. Judson Babcock for approval of a 196 unit apartment project on the aforementioned parcel of 35.1 acres. William Wessel, Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission 3/5/77 _T�'ot,4 rw4� L-A-t4e- /Aer-, CT-Va. MEMORANDUlull TO: PLANNING COMMISSION FROM;: STEPHEN PAGE, PLANNING ASSISTANT RE: TV,1IN OAKS APARTMiENTS SKETCH PLAN DATE: JANUARY 21, 1977 This proposal is very similar to the one presented (and later dropped) by Peter Bergh about 18 months ago. This project entails the selling off of two lots, one of 4.86 A for the tennis facility, and the balance of 35 A for the apartment proje( The following issues should be considered: access - This proposal should not be approved until the deed for Twin Oaks Terrace has been accepted by the City. Access with the two abutting parcels to the tivest, and with property to the east should be provided; such access ti,,,ould eliminate f� unwanted curb cuts on Kennedy Drive and would enhance the safety and circulation of the proposed project. Data on traffic generation, and roadway and intersection capacity will be forthcoming. municipal facilities - The impact on the school system and sewage treatmeri-f--p-1—ant must be assessed; the impact on other facilities, such as recreation, police, water, fire, etc., where there appears to be less of a "crunch", will also be reviewed. open space and recreation - The developable land on the site is being very intensively used; steep slopes, drainageways, and swampland constitute the open space on this project; the applicant should explain the provisions being made for open space an'd recreation, such as tennis, swimming, pedestrian trails, ballfields, etc. 9 + 3" r"O R T 70 H.D. MONS Kennedl or. 6 5' RT 00 zo 00 S N 82"06,03" F 3E- C:)t . 4", lv'nN '7 ' 3ET CONC. MON. 3ET CONIC MON 60 c'j t- LL! 1 in n -o6 BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS VOL. 104 PG. 419 -421 JUNE 30, 1972 in 0 J Rood Future Set 1. P. 00' PARCEL # 1 = 5.32:t ACRES -01 s 0 Uj 2A. Inej 0 II L le 10 0 - conc. Mon. -TING 0 'n Pi„ 45 0,9R NIS TO FCPE 37 kE,,,LTY 8e PG 45 I J AN PARCEL # 2 = 34.54 ACRES DOOR 0 )00" t;oftc. Mon. t4 15 r- (n 0\ v M'N E X ST 1417 Set I. P. oo i N / r C.il -ru-y '90 !,P W 'Cb"-"'�J& N 7 3 0 0 VOL. 56 I15.05'404 Sot 1. P �N �ao o 4. 4 2 W Set LP.304— — 4.35' Set 1. P Uk V E DATA cl R TH 801it'll- N L G.M.P. R. -O.W 7 0" j v -T -: VT I E R NA T E 44 -�--'77 A F 7 21 Ij t N 376 W 02 E 32 Ac 'IT 3 65. e3 S F I VT H U 37" 03' 50" W —vT 2 MON. 0 MCN. 1,)o, " F) 1,7' )3()W BOUND -3 ...... FORTH + ?00, 61 4 A R i, F '-,E 0 200 400 600 ---- 8 rx-'; 4�4 I Certify this to be c rorroct Survey Br.sed on information obtampo f r orn Town Re,-.crds, Ground Evidence the Owner. tq T r Kirb Rd. kG-1 NTE� I' -KA IF Al R P� ,*V,k 5 \ \, 1 U RL I NOTON IF S!"I E LOCAT ION vIcItNITY MAP A L L LAt- A H I %-,-, S SA$, L-i- R U E NORTH; INFO. F Rz.' v N I `rY ,'-', F F+'G VV!AY P L. A N S, PROJE c 7 1 - 8q- '4) SHEE-f 1.; of i25- I iNFORlV-Arl-%N Al,!'!G INTIEm",TATE. 8:) NC-iTHFF,,LY P.O.W. OBTAINED FFI0.'-O VT. HiGHWAY ';FPT. FRJlECT # .1-80-3 llt14, SHEETS 14 a 15 OF 125 INFORMATION ALONG KENNEDY DRIVE FOUTHERLY R.O.W. OBTAINED FROM VT. HIGHWAY DFPT. PROJECT U 528-2-(2) SHEETS 44845 OF 64 BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER, INC. (TWIN CIAKS) PROPERTY Proposed to be t,ronsfered to Others SOUTH BJHLINGTON, VERMONT r C. -T- D F V ER MO N N C, x 2 i 8 VE R MONT T" 1 13! RL, NG TONI APPROVE::, GGH ,A-G T.Nl 8, (3(3H DATE 5-3-74 HE C", F D 200' PROJ NO. 2811 SHEET or ct Ld-ss,--PN/, = 7,7-P4-71 4//fir reDv./ V► o f P L►/ -T�v i K.( C-Ai:f.s -►� ;t_-:_ a tt 1L 6,vran C . 7/ 7— GL[G1, �-0/��'wu�Ge�i� �U►+���v �4�vw ( �Uy W�v� Q,�%� 4 moo'' pow &4014 lt�� • dpta.,..sP� �� , • �Q '(0o'eft/ April 4, 1977 ttr. A. .Judson uabcock Valley ProfeSSiOnal Center `vaitsfield, Vermont 0567.3 Dear Mr. Baf cock, At their regular meeting on March 23, 1P77 the South Burlington .School Board voted Vsat the proposed Twin Oaks develop:�ent outlined in your letter dated January 33, 1977 would not Place an unreasonable burden on this muni- cipality to nrov;de educational services. Because of our concern for the safety of our students, it is rec'uested t iat sidewalks be provided in conjunction with the roads to be constructed. This will allow students to walk safely to and from bus stops. I are enclosing a copy of our transportation policy for ,your information. Please note iten #4 under the adrlinistrative guidelines - Muses will not be routed over n'tivate roads. If you have any questions, please contact rye. Sincerely yours, Frederick ii. Tuttle Superintendent of Schools FI IT : c 1 enc. ,/cc: Mr. Stephen Page, Planning Assistant Mr. John Lucas, Business Manager -- Speed �� �® 4�-9�2 ! lei 1���, tii,,,, l� r /� "J. � Speed Letters From To 9�- Subject —No.4 d 10 FOLD MESSAGE REPLY —No.B FJL6 —Na.10 FOLD wilsom es GRAYUI• E FC S PMT 6714]5•P � Date _, g ; Signed Dated Signed RETAIN WHITE COPY, RETURN PINK COPY. TURN OVER FOR USE WITH WINDOW ENVELOPE T. H. A., INC. CONSTRUCTION AND MANAGEMENT VALLEY PROFESSIONAL CENTER WAITSFIELD. VERMONT 05674 TELEPHONE 802 . 496-2580 May 17, 1978 Mr. Steven Page Planning Assistant City of South Burlington 1175 Williston Road South Burlington, Vermont 05401 RE: Twin Oaks Project Dear Steve: v►� -Ers To V-s-4mv t-'T roc . ACITIV R E46v^0=Fr I have enclosed for your review and comments the landscape plans and specifications for building cluster I, II, III. If you would provide Russel Ray with this information before our proposed meeting of next week, it might be helpful in expediting the projects final approval. If I can be of assistance or any questions arrise before our meeting, please contact me. Respectfully, Frank W. Alling FWA/llf Enclosures 0 W; C I Section 2G Landscaping i) All Landscape work including plantings, trees, gravel drip edges, steps, exterior concrete slabs, edoa divider strips between different surfaces, paved and unpaved walkways, finish grading, spreading of top -soil and final raking, seeding and fertilizing up to all building foundation lines. Refer to Drawing Nos. L1, L2, L3, V*. ii) For Planting Schedule refer to Drawing No. L2. iii) Material for drip edges and rear patios to be 1" crushed stone placed to dimensions as shown on drawings.` iv) Grass seed shall be new crops IMixed and guaranteed by the dealer to conform to the following proportions. Kentucky Blue Grass Perrenial Rye Creeping Red Fescue Annual Rye Red Top White Clover Inert lylaterials Pen Lawn Red Fescue "Conservation Mix" 20 11% 34% 150 100 5% 5% 0 "Old English Sunny" 26 31% 33 , 0 0 0 0 1021 v) Seed all disturbed areas with "CM "Conservation Mix" and seed high traffic areas and areas around buildings with "ES", "Old EEnglish Sunny" tdix, as indicated on drawings. vi) All areas to be seeded, shall be finished, graded and raked, then limed and fertilized in application rates as required by soil condition. vii) Apply (1) thickness of black 4 mil. poly in a sand bed beneath all crushed stone, drip edges and patios (see typical detail Drawing L3). viii) Protect all newly seeded areas with hay mulch. ix) Topsoil to be minimum 12" thick after settlement. Refer to Division 2 of the Project Pdanual, Section 2D. x ) Walkways shall be 12 " Bituminous asphalt or 2" 'stamate' (rockfines) where indicated on drawings. Finished surfaces to be placed over 6" of compacted plant mix gravel. c5 Section 2 G Landscaping continued xi) Divider between crushed stony and grass for rear patios shall be 4 x 6 creosoted rough sawn hemlock, set to grade and staked in place with creosoted 2x4's. xii) Bark mulch shall be clean and free of large branches and large bark slabs. :aterial shall be spread to a minimum depth of 3". xiii) Retaining walls at building elevation changes shall be constructed of 4- x 616 rough sawn hemlock, creosoted and backfilled with frost free gravel. Section 2H Surface Improvements i) a) All roadway construction from Twin Oaks Terrace to the temporary cul-de-sac at approximate survey station 22+00 as indicated on Drawing U-1. b) The road shall be constructed in accordance with the Plans and the roadway typical section on Drawing U-14 or as modif'pd and ao roved by the City Engineer, South Bur-.ington, U. ii) a) All roadway and parking lot construction within the Phase I boundaries as indicated on Dra lLngs U 1-U4. b) All temporary road construction and removal thereof, iii) I-Taterials for road construction to conform to the latest revision of the State of Vermont, Department of Highways, Standard Specifications for Highway and Bridge Construction, or as modified and approved by the City 'Engineer. biA 18 DIVISON 2 t SITS WORK Section 2D LAWNS AND PLANTING 1. General Conditions: A & 3, General under this section. Applicable requirements of Divisions Conditions, shall govern work 2. Scotie of Workt This section includes furnishing all Materials, equipment, and labor necessary for preparation'of final grades in law:1 areas including spreading of topsoil, fine grading, soil treatment and lawn construction, and planting required to complete the work indicated on the drawings and specified: a. Spreading of topsoil. b. Lawn Construction. c . Planting. d . Parki no lot bollards. 3. Plantin_g Seasont Planting of lawns shall be done during the season or seasons which are no —.—al for such work as determined by weather condit_ons.?nd by accepted practice in locality. More specifically, lawns shall be constructed between March lst, ar_d May 1st, and between August 15th and October 1st. 4. Spreadinz ToDsoilt a. When the building and site improvements work has progressed sufficiently, work of spreading, topsoil to finish grade shall, regardless of titre; of year, be commenced provided subgrade is not muddy and the topsoil to be used is neither muddy or frozen. b. Topsoil stripped from the site shall be used for preparation of lawns and may be used for preparation of planting beds. Foreign debris such as sticks, stones, over 2" in diameter, roots etc., shall be removed from the topsoil. c. Topsoil shall be spread on all stringed planted areas including lawn area and planting beds after fills are properly settled and the subgrade approved by the Owner. The settled topsoil shall be up to the finished grades called for on the Drawings. Scarify subgrade to a depth of 2 inches before placing topsoil. a•an i;r DIVISION2 : SITS WORK Section 2D L.kWNS AND PLANTING 4. d. Reserve sufficient amount of topsoil to be used as required for planting. e. If an excess of topsoil exists, it shall be stock- piled as directed by the Architect on the site for the Owner's use. f. Borrow Topsoil: The Contractor shall furnish additional topsoil, as may be necessary, at his own expense, and it shall be fertile, friable, natural, and productive topsoil of a good clay, loam'type. It shall be without admixture of subsoil and shall be reasonably free of stones, lumps, roots and sticks, and other foreign matter and shall not be used in a muddy or wet condition. Submit samples for approval by the Architect. 5. Lawn Construction: a. Fertilizers Commercial fertilizer shall be applied evenly at the rate of 20 pounds per 1000 square feet. Fertilizer shall bear a manufacturer's guaranteed statement of analysis and shall' be delivered in unopened bags. Incorporate well into soil. Ratio shall be in accordance with Local Soil Conservation Authorities. b. Seeding: Following distribution of topsoil to the required depth after settlement and fertilization, all lawn areas shall be raked to grade leaving the finished grade without mounds or hollows and meeting proposed grades. Following the raring, lawn grass seed shall be sown at the rate of five pounds per thousand square feet. Seeding shall be done with mechanical seeder sowing z the 2uanti ty of seed in one direction, and the remaining 2 at right angles to the first operation. Seeding shall be done on a windless day. Seeded areas shall be lightly raked with bamboo or wooden rakes and rolled with water ballast roller. 1. All seed shall be delivered in original packages, unopened, bearing guaranteed analysis. 2. Where danger of erosion exists, on slopes and swales, Contractor shall protect same by staking tobacco netting or by spreading hay mulch. KA20 DIVISION 2: SITE WORK Section 2D LAWNS AND PLANTING 5. b. j. When seeding is done bcf'ore August 15tn, the Contractor shall treat lawn areas after the second mowing with approved commercial products for control of crab grass and noxious weeds. Architect shall be notified of treatment used. Rates of application shall be as recommended by the manufacturer. 4. Provide sufficient hose and sprinkler heads for adequate watering to maintain a moist seed bed at all times. c. Maintenance of Lan areas: All areas and spots that do not show a prompt. "catch" shall be reseeded at intervals or ten days, which process shall continue until a growth of grass is established over the entire lawn area. Grass shall be mowed to a height of 2" whenever the average height of grass is heavy, it shall be removed to prevent smothering of und,erlyi ng turf. 6. Planntina: a. Plant Materials: 1. Shall conform to the American Association of Nurserymen's "Standards for Nursery Stock" relative to quality control, unless specifically amended by the Drawings or these Speci`_'ications. All plants shall be nursery grown or obtained from the site as directed by the Architect. 2. Nomenclature: The names of plants required under this contract conform to Standardized Plant Names, prepared by the American Joint Committee on Horticulture Nomenclature, Names of varieties are those com.;aonly used in the trade. 3. Quantities: Quantities required to comole;-- the work are as shown on the Planting Plan. In case of discrepancies between quantities shown on the plant list and the planting plan, those shown on the plan shall govern. 4. Size plants shall have a habit of growth that is normal for the species and shall be sound, healthy, vigorous and free from insect pests, plant pests, DIAG1 DIVISION 23 SITE WORK Section 2D LAWNS AND PLANTING 6. a. 4. plant diseases and injuries. All plants shall equal or exceed the measurments specified in the plant list, which are minimum acceptable sizes. They shall be measured before planting, with branches in normal position. Any necessary pruning shall be done at time of planting. Requirements for measurements, branching, grading, quality, balling and burlapping of plants in the Plant List generally follow the code of standards currently recommended by the American Association of Nurserymen, Inc. in the American Standard for Nursery Stock. 5. Substitutions: Will be permitted only upon submission of proof that any plant called for is not obtainable. 6. Type of Protection to Roots s a. Balled and Burlapped Plants. All plants in the Plant List shall be balled and burlapped. They shall be dug with firm, natural balls of earth of sufficient diameter and depth to encompass the fibrous and feeding root system necessary for full recovery of the plant. Balls shall be firmly wrapped with burlap or similar material and bound with twine, cord or wire mesh. Where necessary to prevent cracking of the ball during the process of planting, the ball may be secured to a platform. b. Protection After Deliveryt Planting of plant materials shall be done during the season or seasons which are normal for such work as determined by weather conditions and by accepted practices. At option of and on responsibility of Contractor, planting may be done during unseasonable conditions. c. Fertilizer shall. be dehydrated cow manure of a commercially bagged grade such as Bovung, Dri-Conure or approved equal. d. Water shall be clean, potable and free from deleterious substances. Water will be available from sources on site. e. Pine bark mulch shall be 100% softwood pine bark, 1/8" to 1" in size free of foreign matter. MA22 DIVISION 2: SITE WORK Section 2D LAWNS AND PLANTING 6. a. 6. f. Stakes shall be 2" x 4" x 2'-6" for giving and 2" x 2" x 8' for staking, sound wood and treated with creosote or other approved wood preservative. g. Nose friction guards to encase guy wires fastened to trees shall be new or used 2-ply reinforced rubber garden hose cut to lengths of no less than 10". h. Wire for guys or for fastening trees to stakes . shall be No.12 guage plyable steel wire. i. Wrapping materials for tree trunks shall be burlap or standard two ply crepe paper or other acce_rtable material in strips 4" to 6" wide. b. Field Measurements: 1. Take all necessary field measurements to properly locate trees and shrubs and to carry out the intent,of the Drawings, c. Installation and Workmanship: 1. Layout: New punting shall be located where shown on the plans except where obstructions below ground or overhead are encountered or where changes have been made in the construction. Alternate locations will be designated where any obstructions occur. 2. Planting Pits: Reasonable care shall be exercised to have pits dug and soil prepared prior to moving plants to their respective locations for planting to ensure that they will not be u::neccessari ly exposed to dryin- elements or to physical damage. Circular pits with vertical sides shall be excavated for all plants except for plants specifically designated on the plans to be planted in beds. 3. Diameter of pats for trees and :>hx^sbs shall be at least two feet greater than the diameter of the ball or spread of roots. The depth of pits for trees and shrubs shall be enough to accommodate the ball or roots when the plant is set to finished grade allowing 12" of compacted topsoil or prepared soil in the bottom of tree pits and 6" in the bottom of shrub beds. DIVISION 2: SIT" WORK Section 2D LAWNS AND PLANTING 6. e. 4. Soil Preparation: Soil used in planting pits and beds shall be topsoil, as herein before spe^ified, thoroughly mixed with one part manure to five parts of existing soil. Very poor soils, gravel, hard -pan, or other soil injurious to plants shall not be used. Except for ericaceous plants, very acid or sour soil (having a pH of less than 6) shall be thoroughly mixed with sufficient lima to produce a slightly acid reaction (a pH of 6 to 6.5). 5. Setting Plants: Plants shall be planted upright and faced to give the best appearance or relation- ship to adjacent areas. No burlap shall be pulled out from under balls. Platforms, wire and surplus binding from top and sides of the balls shall be removed. All broken or frayed roots shall be cut off cleanly. 6. Guying, Staking and 'Trapping: Trees shall be supported immediately after planting. All trees 3 inches and over in truck diameter shall be guyed and wrapped. Smaller trees shall be staked. Wires shall be encased in hose to prevent contact with bark of the tree and shall be placed around the trunk in a single loop. Wires shall be tightened and kept taut by twisting the strands together. a. Guying: Guying shall be done with three guys spaced equally about each tree. Each guy shall consist of twostrands of wire attached to the tree trunk at an angle of about 60 degrees at about two -fifths of the height of the tree and anchored at the ground either to notched stakes which have been driven into the ground at an angle.away from the tree so that the tops of the anchor stakes are below finished grade or (where underground utilities are within four feet of finished grade) to deadmen placed at least 3 feet below finished grade. A wood or metal fla- shall be secured to each guy wire a few inches above ground. b. Staking: Two stakes shall be equally spaced on opposite sides of each tree and the end treated with wood preservative shall drive vertically into the ground to a depth of 2z to 3 feet in such a manner as not to injure the ball or roots. DiA24 DIVISION 2: SITE WORK Section 2D LAWNS AND PLANTING 6. c. 6. b. Trees shall be fastened to each stake at a height of about five (5) feet by means of two strands of wire and hose as above. Stakes shall be uniform in height and placed according to the diameter of the tree trunk as follows: 2 to 3 inches 2 stakes C. Additional guying as required shall be at the direction of the Architect in the field. 7. Wrappingi Promptly after planting, the trunks of all trees shall be wrapped spirally from the ground line to the height of the second branches. All wrapping shall be neat and snug and the material shall be held in place by a suitable cord. 8. mulching: All plants shall be mulched with a three inch layer of pine bark mulch within two days after planting. This mulch shall entirely cover the area of the Planting Pit, bed or saucer around each plant. d. Maintenance: 1. Any damage to lawn areas as the result of planting operations shall be repaired to the satisfaction of the Owner. 2. Maintain trees and all planted areas throughout the guarantee period. Maintenance shall consist of cultivating, spraying, weeding and watering and any other operations necessary to properly maintain the plant materials. e. Guarantee: 1. All plant materials shall be guaranteed by the Nursery to be true to name and size and in vigorous growing condition. All plant materials shall be guaranteed by him for one year. Final acceptance will be acknowledged after plant materials have been in place one year and are in vigorous and healthy growing condition. 2. During the guarantee period, the Contractor shall replace in accordance with the Plans and Specifications, any plants that are dead or in the opinion of the Architect, in an unhealthy or unsightly condition due to dead branches, excessive pruning or other causes. MALE DIVISION 2: SITE WORK Section 2D LAWNS AND PLANTING 6. e. 3. Replacement shall be made as soon as weat:^.er or seasonal conditions permit as directed by the Architect. The Contractor's responsibility for replacing plant materials shall erg? -with final acceptance, except that any replaced plant materials shall be guaranteed for a period of one year from date of replacement. f. Clean-up: 1. The Contractor shall dispose of excess materials and debris including but not limited to branches, paper and rubbish resulting from his work. 2. All areas shall be kept clean and neat and upo:t completion of work the site shall be lest in an orderly condition satisfactory to the A-rchitect. 4.-,tom SvzSs. c�y , \\.// cFr-- ro rz...t coe(e:� S\v \&&r-� 4�5 J "PigA14a2 1koP � <0 - R& z----- �� - -- 92m� T e-Tp Dise4-�� ► GTE '�5c a;t:-) dri ?�`7 ;14 POC-� wrt-- AoWW a� ora f�vw,05rb1 03s INTERNAL MEDICINE Peter D. Alden, M.D. Charles M. Gluck, M.D. John H. Milne, M.D. Thomas W. Martenis, M.D. Mildred A. Reardon, M.D. Michael J. Scollins, M.D. South Burlington South Burlington South Burlington, Dear Sirs: Aesculapius Medical Center ONE TIMBER LANE • SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05401 TELEPHONE: 802-65 s-4714 August 24, 1977 Planning Commission City Hall Vt. 05401 We are informed of the Twin Oaks Associates plan to build a 180 unit apartment project on their land which borders on the west of Aesculapius, Inc. We are also informed that the Planning Commission suggests an emergency exit be developed between the Twin Oaks project and the parking lot of the Aesculapius Medical Center. I am writing to express our opposition to the suggested location of the planned emergency exit. We are concerned about the safety of our patients, many of whom are elderly and infirm, should the parking lot ever have to be used as a through way for emergencies. Such patients, some in wheelchairs, would have difficulty moving out of the way of rapidly moving vehicles. To keep such an emergency exit always clear would result in a loss of several of our parking spaces. Cars now park in that end of the park- ing lot. Our trash receptacle is also in the area and would have to be moved to another part of the parking lot using up more parking spaces. The problem would be especially acute during the winter when, in the past, most of our snow has been piled at the west end of the parking lot where the emergency exit as planned would be. To pile the snow around the edges of the lot would further restrict parking. Instead of the Aesculapius parking lot, we wonder if any consideration could be given to establishing such an emergency exit with the apart- ment complex to the south of the Aesculapius property? Thank you for your concern about this matter, and your kindness in giving us the opportunity to comment. Yours truly, P,oh"'H. Milne, M.D. President, Aesculapius, Inc. JHM/bb +.76jwt 1�4 WZ&JP /_fl7b �Wlt4 A;6c) EA (d�4 WZ67J r� 1 id Tv ►ti4 LZro . ZS 958 �y V.4 Cam — c._ TcLtP (2� � rz L.)w-r- e, vq P-avuA&c ` 6vRr= c v )T\,kt. C64.-,, tea, Ass- 'oasar 50 z L14- VIG= +� ?�O A --a s 1 L+p 3 J�L= C, = Goo q o Y2, E�Jon(t-n -ez-lw -T;,04IV4 ar-f=p- IV..4ffi-c, K- -Tia s\T, oc, a I -F- F-5" S I�q � tetra VIG`.�o No C+tbNC� 21 "G4 11y t ► 4 rb -�-7�T "l�VINAsK� 1914 �.- Wit iston Rr1 ---Vol 219 + 35 60' RT To T. H. D, MONF3. r_ To Dorset St - Kennedy D: �- j � `�219 4-35 65 RT. 100' N 82o 06' 03 E._ S 8035 - 1211 p0' '31"E BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER, INC. VOL. /04 PAGE 419- 42/ ✓UNE 30, /972 PA RCEL NO. 2 35. / t ACRES 1 ---- 60' FUTURE ROAD 440.00 _-„---- 1 N83°14 PARCEL No. 4.8 r Acres W �Io 00 �Iv N 8 2 ° 06' 03 " E 110.00' SET CONIC M0N --'` 200,00 SET CONIC. MON. 60Uj Zrn � W Ixm °o m a > cv "� 0 0 1 M � IY 0 a> i i I.P. tEXi 1 ►N6 Conc. Mon. a 1 0, t a M a 3 3 1v ' O CY 7 1 o > to O 1 O� �� 4 M 1 a o _ 1 1 1 I 1 � LL ' N/F DANIEL J. 8 LEO O,BRIEN VOL.46 PG, 45 W O,BRIENS TO FOREST PARK REALTY VOL 88 PG 45 -� To 4 JA N., 1968 N OD 0 m N 1 l "T" 16 17 30 3 73 VT. H. D. MON . I PIN EXISTING N/ F C.H. TILLY VOL 56 PG 438 CURVE DATA R. NORTH BOUND A = 230 39'30" LT VT. H.D. MON. D = 10 00' R = 5729.65' L 2365, 83' T = 12oO.U3' M N H. D 5 87° 03' 30" W �_y_ ____ 200' no, _ �----�-- -- VT H D. M O N 58872 1 O _ _ J--89 it Z-89 �«- ---- t998 55 �— S 97003'30"M1 _�-�__. _ N{3RTH BOUND PT '- _ '2006+00 2000+61 22 T.S. 2012+77. TO GRAP41C SCALE i1111N1iry 20o pF V � GORDON G. S Certify this to be a correct Survey s •k HARLOW � Based on information obtained from Town •p No, 154 Records, Ground Evidence 81 the Owner.�O`S7F�wf� .. ,, ant �r INTE R'N, AIR Z a SOUT Q o BURLINGTON �P/ M s a ION VICINITY MAP NOTE' ALL BEARINGS BASED ON TRUE NORTH; INFO. FROM INTERSTATE HIGHWAY PLANS, PROJECT• I - 89-3 {141 SHEET t5 of 125. INFORMATION ALONG INTERSTATE 89 NORTHERLY R.O.W. OBTAINED FROM VT. HIGHWAY DEPT. PROJECT # 2-89-3 -(14) SHEETS 14 1115 OF 125 INFORMATION ALONG KENNEDY DRIVE SOUTHERLY R.O.W. OBTAINED FROM VT. HIGHWAY D€PT PROJECT ;* U 528 - 2 - (2) SHEETS 44 B 45 OF 64 BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER, INC. (TWIN OAKS) PROPERTY Proposed to be transfered to Others SOUTH BtJRLINGTON, VERMONT ENGINEERS INCORPORATED OF VERMONT PO. BOX 2I87 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT SURVEY i_.D.Y. DES tGN APPROVED GG" CALC. T.M.E. DRAWN GGH DATE fE5.7, 1977 CHECKED TRACED •J S C SCALE " PP.-3.i. NO. 4199 � H F /° 513(-]`� A. Judson Babcock Valley Professional Center Waitsfield, Vermont 05673 802-496-2580 LIST OF WAVERS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMISSION Twin Oaks Apartments, South Burlington, Vt. 05401 4/27/77 * 1. Proposed finished grades not shown. Cuts of 5'-0" or more and fills of 1'-O" or more indicated on preliminary storm drainage drawing dated 4/27/77. * 2. Details of connections to existing water and sewer services not shown. . * 3. Temporary field markers not placed. 4. All streets will be privately owned and maintained with the exception of area shown on preliminary plat dated 4/27/7�. * 5. Interior walkways to building not shown on preliminary plat. A 12'-0" clearance is shown to allow for parking bumpers, walks and snow storage. 6. Storm drainage system will be as indicated on plan. Storm sewers and catch basins and curbs are not proposed. * Information to be shown on final plat. CITY OF SOUTH BURI LINGTON APPLICATION FOR A DEVELOPP•:EN7 OR SUEDIVISIGI"i PE,, iIT lk) A) 1. Applicant's Name, Address, and Phone Number 802-496-25 0 A. JUDSON BABCOCK, VALLEY PROFESSIONAL CENTER, WAITFIELD 41d VERMONT, 05673 2. Name, Address, and Phone I;umber of the Person ::fiom the Commission should contact regarding this Application A. JUDSON BABCOCK (Same address as above) 3. Nature of the Development or Subdivision Multi -family, rental apartments 4. Location of Development or Sut division Off Kennedy Drive Adjacent to Twin Oaks Tennis Centre, see location map on survey enclosed 5. High and Low Elevations o_' the Tract of Land involved with the Development or Subdivision Lowest elevation 263.25' above mean sea level. Highest elevation 320.00' above mean sea level 6. Address of each of the Applicant's Offices in Vermont Same as above Item No. 1 7• Applicant's Legal Interest in the Property (Fee Simple, Option, Etc.) Presently under option 2/9/77 _ 2 8. If the Applicant is not an individual, the Form, Date, and Place of Formation of the Applicant FORM: DATE: PU"CE : 9. Estimated Cost, Exclusive of Land Cost of the Development (Applicant for a Subdivision need Not Lswer) $4,500,000 10. Application for a Subdivision, the Dumber of Lots NOT APPLICABLE 11. What Restrictive Covenants are Planned ror any Deed(s) to be issued? NOT APPLICABLE 12. Description of the Proposed Development of Subdivision _ _-_ A. Plans and Specifications: (1) Attach a detailed plat or plot plan of the proposed project drawn to scale, showing the location and dimensions of the entire tract. This plan should also show: all lots, streets, roads, water lines, sewage systems, drain systems, buildings, existing or intended. (2) In subdivisions where individual water and sewage facilities are intended, indicate the proposed location(s). (3) Show all easements, parks, playgrounds, parking areas, water courses, and other bodies of water, natural or artificial, existing or intended. (4) Include a contour reap of the land involved drawn on a scale of 5 foot contour intervals. (5) Indicate on the plans the location and width of any easements for utilities, roads, etc., exist- ing or intended. Attach a written explanation of any such easements. . -3- 13. What is the purpose of this Subdivision or Develop-ment and What is the intended use of the land after Subdivision or Development? To develop and construct multi -family rental housing 14. Describe the Site of the Proposed Development or Subdivis— ion including information, if available, on Soils Streams or Other -bodies of Water, Bedrocks, Etc. Soils within the proposed developed areas are primary sandy with no ledge or high water table evident 15. Acreage: A. Number of acres owned, or in which you have a legal interest 35t B. Number of acres in this project 35 acres C. Number of acres previously developed 4.8 t acres" D. When do you anticipate beginning the project srina 1977 E. When will this development or subdivision he comn?eted 16. Water System: A. What type of water system is to be provided, such as: Individual system on each lot, conruni.ty system, municipal system, etc. The extension of an 8" municipal service from Twin Oaks Road B. Where is the nearest municipal water system and is it available and feasible to use it? See above. Item 16A, it is available and feasible 17. Sewage System: A. What type of sewage disposal system is to be provided or intended, such as: Individual system on each lot, community system, or municipal system? Municipal system B. Where is the nearest cor�:,unity sewage sy ste and is it available and feasible to use it? Twin Oaks Road it is available and feasible C. If the sewage system is other than a co�.r unity municipal, or individual lot septic tangy: and leaching field, include competent professional enginOering evidence that it will perform satisfactorily. 18. Adjacent Property: A. List below the names and addresses of adjacent property owners. Aesculapius Med. Ctr. Forest Park Condo Assoc., C.H. Tilly, Vt. Dept. Highways I89, Howard Bank, Arthur Berger B. What is the adjacent property used for at present? Highway, condos, undeveloped meadow C. What is the future usage intended for the_adj`cent property? Possible multifamily 19. Zoning: A. Which District or Districts is the proposed site with- in according to the official zoning nap of the City? R7 DATE !� =' ��SIGNATURE �.... , war ft4 0 W. r= -- -: AA �. . ilk GuTs C1�N�.e� C�rznt� ���ES L � r nu- �./a= `_ J'� �a� ��► �.A.�c � rkc�►�o�. �i��c--s 'ax.�(-,� I�huTr ems. �.�-ter- � �ua��-ram-- r�e. T�,� ����� Vtc►t�{.trr //�� �/ t r � 4 73m%4461) z w9wawA �C �L. Cv�s � �ta¢� � - � ��,�.�►-cry � �✓t�� i> I -460 Go -- ---- _ �{ (�A • G_ fit- :�3�_ _ _ _ _ Z. 3!� 3 Q�c e� _----- - ---- --- o .d. sl/s/77 POW - -------------- t /A,f=-AAt#44jLw,s0S 0 -400-- AW L11 !'�.pril 20, 1977 T . i:t . A. Incorporated Valley Professional Center Waitsfield', Vermont 05673 ilttention : 'ichael stand Re. Twin Oaks Development rennedy Drive, So. Burlington, Vt. To Thai,. It "lay Concern. The move referenced project will be conLected to the municipal water and sewer systems. The city's airport Parkway Sewage Treatntent Plant is nearing capacity. The plant cannot accomodate all the projects that are being planned. a system of phasing the projects is now being devised. There is no assurance that this project will be included in its entirety or in part. Lxpansion of tide sewage treatment facilities is planned for 1901 contigent on the passage of a bone: issue:. Work outside of tic project area r.,ay be required of the developers to strengthen the water system to provide an adequate water supply for fire protection. Wj Slh cc: Curtis W. Carter ;nvironmental Coordinator Very truly yours, ',-illiam J . Szymanski City Nlanager 4()4rq (-7'- TWIN OAKS APARTMENTS GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW DENSITY The project will consist of 196 rental apartments in twenty one separate buildings. There will be six different building types having a varied mix of 1 bedroom, 2 bedroom and 3 bedroom units. See buildina schedule on preliminary plat. Max. Allowable density on the 35 acre property is 245 units. Proposed density is 20% less than the max allowable. ERROSION & SOIL CHARACTERISTICS Areas of cut and fill will be graded to a 3 on 1 slope and bank stabilization recommendations by Tom McClay of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service will be incorporated into the final design. The major soil type on the property is classified as "Hinesberg" sandy loam. Having slight limitations for building construction and moderate limitations for road and parking lot construction. See attached soil interpretation sheet. ACCESS & RIGHT OF WAY It is the developers intention to extend a right of way privilege to the two abuttors to the 'West, Brand and Bergner. The right of way will enable them to cross Twin Oaks property and gain access to Twin Oaks terrace. A limited emergency access right of way will be deliniated to the Tilley property, and a right of way to the Aesculapi us property will be granted for a wal kway. ROADS & PARKING All roads within the project will be privately owned and maintained. The roadways will be constructed within a clear deliniated width of 60'. All buildings will be set back 30' from this line. The travelled road surfaces will be 30":,wide, including shoulders. The distance between the parking area and State of Vermont Greenbelt will not be less than 30'. Cluster entrances will be 30' wide. MUNICIPAL IMPACTS Schools - Please see the attached letter from Mr. Tuttle stating that our impact will not adversely affect the system. Traffic - The traffic analysis indicates that the new impact will be minimal both in terms of actual cars and percentage. Sewer - Mr. Symanski has stated that our 60,000 gallons per day can be absorbed into the present system. Manhole spacing max. will not exceed 300'. SOIL. SURVEY INTERPRETATIONS SOIL SERIE8-HINES B U R G PAP SYMBOL$ — [gXAIPTICN OF THi S011, Soils of this series are well drained and formed in sandy material, 15 to 40 inches thick, over silty material. n a7e soils occupy lake plains and beaches of old lake bads. Slopes are dominantly 0 to 15 percent but range to 25 percent. The surface and subsoil layers consist of sandy materials and are underlain with silty material at a depth ranging from 15 to 40 inches. Parmeability is moderately rapid or rapid in the sandy material and moderately slow in the underlain silty material. The silty material tends to hinder the downward movement of water and can cause a saturated condition above it. Available moisture capacity is moderately low and natural fertility is low. Depth to water table and bedrock typically exceeds 5 feet. INTERPRETATIONS AND LIWTATInNc cno cAOUlun Bun not -- SOIL SLOPE CAPABILITY CULTIVATED PASTURE AND ARTIFICIAL WAtERWAYS POND POND PHASE SUBCLASS CROPS HAY DRAINAGE RESERVOIR EMBANKMENTS AREAS A,B IIe SLIGHT SLIGHT NOT NEEDED SLIGHT SLIGHT SEVERE C IIIe MODERATE SLIGHT NOT NEEDED SLIGHT SLIGHT SEVERE D Iva SEVERE MODERATE NOT NEEDED SEVERE SEVERE SEVERE E VIe SEVERE MODERATE NOT NEEDED SEVERE SEVERE SEVERE MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING USE- This soil is favorable for farming and related uses unless the elope gradient is too steep. As slope gradient increases the difficulty of growing and harvesting crops also increases. Erosion also is a potential hazard on sloping to steep areas. Artificial drainage ordinarily is not needed because this soil is well drained. The limitation for embankments is severe because the silty material is difficult to compact when wet. If moisture content and erosion is controlled the limitation is moderate. The material flows when wet however. SOIL I INITATION.c POn wll nl Ica SOIL SLOPE PHASE OPENLAND WILDLIFE WOODLAND WILDLIFE WETLAND WILDLIFE A,B SLIGHT SLIGHT SEVERE C MODERATE SLIGHT SEVERE D,E MODERATE TO SEVERE SLIGHT SEVERE MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING USE- The potential for openland and woodland habitat is good unless slope is too steep. The well drained condition makes establishment of wetland wildlife habitat difficult. WOODLAND INT=PPRFTATIr JC SOIL SLOPE PHASE SEEDLING MORTALITY EROSION HAZARD WINDTHROW HAZARD PLANT COMPETITION EQUIPMENT LIMITATION ORDINATION SUBCLASS HARDWOODS CONIFEROUS A,B,C MODERATE SLIGHT SLIGHT SLIGHT SLIGHT SLIGHT 4e ESTIMATED PRODUCTIVITY RATING FOR SFLECTFn sPFCIFR NORTHERN RED WHITE RED WHITE RED To To HARDWOODS OAK PINE PINE SPRUCE SPRUCE Favor Plant W.P. W.P. 55-65 60-70 R.O. R.P. Site index Site index Un11 tU a 1 A 1 tZiUtl'AK I MtM I Ut AUK ICU IUR E, SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE '"" "" ADVANCE COPY-SU9JECT TO CHANGE AS IN COOPERATION WITH VERMONT AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION AND COORDINATION BETWEEN STATES IS COMPLETED VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF FORESTS AND PARKS , USDA POREST SERVICE JULY 1973 SC,IL SEPI-=3- HINZSACRG SOIL LIMITATIONS FOR RECREATION SO;L SLCnE Pye;r: I CAI4 � aRFaS PICNIC AREAS ATHLETIC FIELDS AND PLAYGROUNDS PATHS AND TRAILS PARKING AREAS A SLIGHT SLIGHT SLIGHT SLIGHT SLIGHT H SLI(7IT i SLIGHT MODERATE SLIGHT SLIGHT C MODERATE MODERATE SEVERE SLIGHT MODERATE D SEVERE SEVERE SEVERE MODERATE SEVERE E I SEVERE SEVERE SEVERE SEVEREI SEVERE MAJCR FAC I)PS AFFECTING USE FOR RECREATION- This soil has good potential for all recreational items unless slope is too seep for layout and construction. Placement and construction of campsites, picnic tables, roads, and parking areas becomes more difficult as slope gradient increases. Land grading will expose unfavorable silty material. NOTE: F_r hw!durs, septic tank sewage systems, ponds, and access roads refer to other sections. SOIL LIMITAT rnK:ccnonnuwtAl n SOIL SE?T!C TANK SLOPE r SE.W GE STREETS AND BUILDINGS ` SANITARY LAWNS, GOLF EXCAVATIONS puA;E DISPOSAL ACCESS WITH WITH WITHOUT FAIRWAYS AND LAND FILL ROADS PIPELINES ETC. BASEMENTS , LANDSCAPING SEVERE SLIGHT TO SLIC;IT TO MODERATE SLIGHT MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE 8 MODERATE SLIGHT TO SLIGHT TO SE T?RE - MODERATE SLIGHT_ MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE �j C I SEA MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE MODERATE__ MODERATE D,E Sr ^RE SEVERE SEVERE SEVERE SEVERE I SEVERE SEVERE MA;CR F;C;CRSAFFE;^!NOUSE FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT- The limitation sof private sewage disposal is severe because Silty ::atr_rial absorbs beco,.,e the and transmits effluent slowly, The silty material also causes sanitary landfill to wet during wet I trenches seasons and has only a fair capacity to support loads. The coarser textured the ut)Per tap feet provide material a good base for streets and roads, but provides only a fair amount of coisture for lawns and soil golf fairways. As slope gradient increases the of _roaion i creas-s. problems of construction and the hazard ESTIMATED PHYSICAL ANn CNCMrnAI oonocor,cc cnr SOIL CLASSIFICATION ; OF M4TERIAL PASSING SIEVE _ V AVAIL. 030A HCR'ZCN PERMEA- SOIL SHRINK- CEP74 I TEX URE UNIFIED AASRO t4 ql0 N40 g200 BILITY WATER CAP, pN SWELL POTENTIAL fiches nJhr. in./in. 0-9 I L'o fine SM A-2,A-4 100 95-100 75-90 15--20 0-�20.0 04-.16 °.1-7.3 Low sand, fina sandy loam, or sandy loam 9-26 Loa..-y fine SP-SH, A-2 100 95-100 75-90 10-35 .0-20.0 02-.08 Low sand, loamy SM .1-7.3 sand, fine sand, sand 26-40 Silt loam or MO A-4 100 95-100 85-95 60-80 .2-0.60 18--.20 Low plus very fine .1-7.3 sandy loam, stratified June 1%9 SUITABILITY OF SOIL AS A SOURCE OF TOPSOIL- Good to fair, loamy, easily worked GRAVEL- Not suitable, little or no gravel SAND- Not suitable, thin layer of sandy ROADFILL- Poor, silty substratum, subject to frost material heave DEFINITION OF RATING TERMS: The soil is evaluated to a depth of 5 feet or less. The three classes of soil limitations are: Slight -relatively free of limitaticns or limitations are easily overcome. Moderate -limitations need to be recognized, but can be overcome with good management and careful design. (back) $were- limitations are severe enough to make use Questionable. - 1 SCS-CONS-5 U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 10-75 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE FILE CODE CONS-14-5 INVENTORY & EVALUATION OF LAND, WATER, AND RELATED RESOURCES %4 f, K t /l)µA'j 70 A �rr�. i��'1'►rlac'2a �% ��L/ G ZIO- tr�wi'41 ! YTPL1�REQUESTED BY �tLOCATION 1._i i '� �� ►�_. ASSISTED BY li �,'�L[.1/aI�_ DATE * 14 INDIVIDUAL ❑ GROUP ❑ UNIT OF GOVERNMENT SITUATION: 'j2 "r V► �'1J t C�7 �-r s� 7•-T i`T- ;mil it of fLe4 L4.' i. L 1 I':4 C C t i r'. 4: G JC 1 f9r, b d 44— l tom lw A r"� L .�' 1�1�iVi. ii rC ✓4a� /�h t_ -%. 4 c z G 16" "Al C SUGGESTED SOLUTION(S)Lj � .ci C.L%% s7t c['z;-*'�sl-r � t c jl r 1�f4-r" "� ► t�.l Cl. T c _ s"'C c� (�[,t r X �l ��! c- s t ,L / i e-S jam— —ml — i a �- R t . iP"%w► "� L s .. c.a 1►�*`t..c i �;, �+1;7 f ..t✓' �.7+^7 T�f ; .� * Check appropriate category SOUTH BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 FREDERICK H. TUTTLE Superintendent LAWRENCE E. LECOURS Assistant Superintendent Mr. A. Judson Babcock Valley Professional Center Waitsfield, Vermont 05673 Dear Mr. Babcock, OFFICE: SOUTH BURLINGTON HIGH SCHOOL 550 Dorset Street April 4, 1977 At their regular meeting on March 23, 1977 the South Burlington School Board voted that the proposed Twin Oaks development outlined in your letter dated January 31, 1977 would not place an unreasonable burden on this muni- cipality to provide educational services. Because of our concern for the safety of our students, it is requested that sidewalks be provided in conjunction with the roads to be constructed. This will allow students to walk safely to and from bus stops. I -am enclosing a copy of our transportation policy for your information. Please note item #4 under the administrative guidelines - 'Buses will not be routed over private roads." If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely yours, 1; iGl z' e Frederick Ii. Tuttle Superintendent of Schools FHT:cl enc. cc: Mr. Stephen Page, Planning Assistant Mr. John Lucas, Business Manager A. Judson Babcock Valley Professional Center Waitsfield, Vermont 05673 802-496-2580 Twin Oaks Apartments TRAFFIC ANALYSIS I CALCULATIONS Project Population = 3.2 persons/unit x 196 units = 628 Project Vehicles = 2.1 persons/vehicle* - 628 = 300 vehicles Present capacities:** Dorset & Kennedy Intersection: 560 V.P.H. Hinesburg & Kennedy Intersection: 489 V.P.H. - St. 620 V.P.H. - Rt. Present Usage ** (Peak Hours): Dorset & Kennedy Intersection. 28-9 12-1 5-6 Hinesburg & Kennedy Inters. 185 241 364 II PROJECTIONS 8-9 A.M. 12-1 P.M. 4-5 P.M. % of Av. Daily Flow Dorset Inters. 6.6 7.0 8.5 Hinesburg Inters. 4.7 6.1 9.2 Increase in Traffic Dorset Inters. 20 21 26 Hinesburg Inters. 14 18 28 % of Capacity Dorset Inters. 3.5 3.7 4.6 Hinesburg Inters. -St. 2.8 3.7 5.7 Rt..2.3 2.9 4.5 *Topics ** C.C.R.P.C. - URBAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY A. Judson Babcock Valley Professional Center Waitsfield, Vermont 05673 802-496-2580 Page -2- Twin Oaks Apartments TRAFFIC ANALYSIS III EFFECT OF PROJECT ON TRAFFIC VOLUMES ALONG KENNEDY DRIVE Projected total vehicles originating from the project at peak hours: 8-9 12-1 5-6 West bound (left turn). 20 21 26 East bound (right turn) 14 18 28 TOTAL 34 39 54 Kennedy Drive peak hour flow: West bound 269 VPH 287 347 East bound. 185 VPH 241 364 ADDENDUtA4 TO OPTION BURLINGTON INDOOR TENNIS CENTERS INC. The parties agree further that an important element of the in- ducement for the Grantee to purchase the optioned premises from the Grantor is the proximity and availability of Grantor's Tennis Facility. Such availability constitutes Grantee's principal pro- posed recreational amenity for any development on the optioned premises. Therefore, in consideration of the Option and Grantee's payments thereunder, the parties agree that said Option shall be amended by adding the following provision: In the event Grantee or his assigns shall exercise said Option, the deed conveying the optioned premises shall include the follow- ing provision which shall be agreed to in writing by all persons holding an interest in the Grantor's premises: "The Grantor agrees that it will make available its tennis facilities to the occupants of any apartments or condominium built on the above described parcel of land on a nondis- criminating basis, and such availability shall be made on the same or more favorable terms as such use is made available from time to time to any other person." WITNESS the execution hereof this Witness it ess day of march, 1977., Grantor Twin Oaks Apartments A. Judson Babcock Valley Professional Center Waitsfield, Vermont 05673 802-496-2580 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS I CALCULATIONS Project Population = 3.2 persons/unit x 196 units = 628 Project Vehicles = 2.1 persons/vehicle* : 628 = 300 vehicles Present capacities:** Dorset & Kennedy Intersection: 560 V.P.H. Hinesburg $ Kennedy Intersection: 489 V.P.H. - St. 620 V.P.H. - Rt. Present Usage ** (Peak Hours): Dorset & Kennedy Intersection. 8-9 12-1 5-6 269 287 347 Hinesburg $ Kennedy Inters. 185 241 364 II PROJECTIONS 8-9 A.M. 12-1 P.M. 4-5 P.M. % of Av. Daily Flow Dorset Inters. 6.6 7.0 8.5 Hinesburg Inters. 4.7 6.1 9.2 Increase in Traffic Dorset Inters. 20 21 26 Hinesburg Inters. 14 18 28 % of Capacity Dorset Inters. 3.5 3.7 4.6 Hinesburg Inters. -St. 2.8 3.7 U,7,) Rt. 2.3 2.9 4.5 *Topics , ** C.C.R.P.C. - URBAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY -71A MEMORANDUM TO: SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: RICHARD WARD, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR RE: TWIN OAKS, APARTMENT PLAN, PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW DATE: 14ARCH 18, 1977 1. This plan does not conform to Section 203.1 subsection (A) of the City Subdivision Regulations. Particularly concerned with the scale of the drawing, unable to check the plan for conformity to zoning regulations, i.e., parking vs. number of units. 2. This plan does not conform to the procedures under 24 V.S.A., Section 4:417 (5), in a memorandum from Attorney Richard Spokes dated February 18, 1977 he makes mention that the proposed park land be suitable for development into playgrounds or other recreational uses. 3. Recommend that alternative means of ingress and egress be provided. 4. Private roads are proposed at 30 feet. A riQht-of-wav of 60 feet minimum should be provided for possible future conversion to public streets. 5. Set -backs of proposed dwellings should be a minimum of 30 feet from street line. A. Judson Babcock Valley Professional Center Waitsfield, Ve=ant 05673 802-495-2530 TWIN OAKS APARP.{ENTS SOUTH BURLV�ON, VEMONT 2 UNIT TYPES fzj�, I� S Z- zo CLUSTER �t #2 03 04 05 06 UNITS T` z ONE B.R. 6 z TD�O B.R. 16 s THREE B.R. 8 TOTAL 3 Q a s `4 y .. z f ' v v- z - L zZ 68 —30n z 7 0 24 Al 24 48 _ - 7 32 xl 102 x2 62 x3 196 -EUTLDZ, S 3-7 0 -c�J 3-10 PHAse Z 3-10 2-10 1-8 - (pH�tS� ,2 3-10 l�l 6-8 �d 54 A. Judson Babcock Valley Professional Center Waitsfield, Vermont 05673 802-496-2580 TWIN OAKS APARTMENTS SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT CLUSTER TYPES ONE B.R. TWO B.R. THREE-B.R. TOTAL # 1 AEC 10 10 4 24 #2 ACCE 10 12 8 30 #3 ABB 6 16 8 30 #4 ACE 10 10 4 24 #5 ABC 4 14 8 26 #6 ACCDD 2... 24 20 46 TOTAL 42 86 52 180 14 C- 1�- cod1 � P /N:'F T� cam— Go►�-prr t o�,s COLS Lr `��ro — ,3 �v 1TiC�.{S plc= cp- 5� JIG= 6Z,:r � Z�I J(Gs1L_40 5Z J�G g M. #413 y'c -413 �. �I /Y�"C�D �-f7t�UiTl OAS, �G.-�1'DI F•iC� �y 1 Nr �%�1,c_,� � �Qh1��D� y �-t�5 �� RAN .-1q ev V�- "0 Gkhw- ��` 37 i No +54 r �VB' ►�� f 1AoC �c`.33 + MW tar �o a TWIN OAKS Page 1 ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF THE TWIN OAKS APARTMENTS ON INTERSECTION TRAFFIC CAPACITIES A. SCOPE OF THE STUDY This study has been prepared for Twin Oaks Associates and the City of South Burlington in order to determine the effect of the Twin Oaks Apartments development upon traffic movement along Kennedy Drive, specifically at the Kennedy Drive -Dorset Street and Kennedy Drive-Rte. 116 intersections. Eventual recommendations for changes in intersection control will be relative to the specific intersection only, and will not consider the effect of those changes in the general traffic pattern of the area. B. ANALYSIS OF PRESENT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 1. Description of Intersections. The various physical factors influencing the flow of traffic through the intersections are presented in Table I below. Both the Kennedy Drive -Dorset Street and Kennedy Drive-Rte 116 intersections are controlled by fixed cycle three phase traffic signals. All four approaches to the Kennedy Drive -Dorset Street intersection have right turn lanes with directional arrows. These were added in the fall of 1975 and were reflected in the calculation of intersection capacities contained in the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission Urban Transportation Study. The right turn on red law became effective in South Burlington on July 1, 1977, and would increase the previously used capacity standards for these intersections. However, these in- creases are not clearly quantifiable and are not considered in this study. TWIN OAKS Page 2 ON DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS ,EFT 'URN IGNAL RIGHT TURN ON RED ON STREET PARKING PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS DESIGN * ADEQUACY REMARKS '0 YES NO SEE GOOD LOCATION OF HIGH SCH00] REMARKS MAY CAUSE INCREASED CONGESTION DUE TO PEDESTRIANS IN FUTURE 10 YES NO SEE FAIR TO SOUTH APPROACH HAS REMARKS GOOD APPROX. 10% GRADE 0 ES NO INSIGNIF. GOOD '0 YES NO INSIGNIF. GOOD '0 ES NO INSIGNIF. GOOD :UTS NEAR INTERSECTION 10 . TWIN OAKS Page 3 2. 1977 Traffic Volumes Traffic counts for both intersections were obtained from the Vermont Department of Highways. (See Appendix A) These were one day, six hour turning movements surveys conducted on August 23, 1977 for the Kennedy Drive-Rte. 116 intersection, and on December 2, 1975 at Dorset Street and Kennedy Drive. These volumes have been updated and recomputed to 1977 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and Peak Hour (PHV) volumes according to Department of Highway formulas and are presented in Table -Iu;ITL C. PROJECTED TRAFFIC INCREASES FROM THE TWIN OAKS APARTMENTS PROJECT Traffic generated by the Twin Oaks Apartments has been forecast according to the standard of one (1) vehicle trip per dwelling unit at peak hour. Of these, 0.75 were vehicles returning to the develop- ment, and 0.25 were exiting. Only the former were considered in this study. Assumptions as to the origin of these return trips were based on the location of major employment centers and commercial development in the Greater Burlington area, including the Digital Industrial Complex. Briefly, the I-89 approach to Kennedy Drive and Dorset Street was as- signed primary importance (40% of additional traffic), while Dorset Street North (15%) and Dorset Street South (15%) and Kennedy Drive East of Rte 116 (30%) were of secondary importance. The distribution of additional vehicle trips within the intersections is shown in Table II and Table III. TWIN OAKS Page 4 F ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC ECTION APPROACHES T KENNEDY DRIVE — RTE. 116 DORSET ST. KENNEDY DR.IKENNEDY DR. RTE. 116 1 RTE. 116 SOUTH WEST EAST NORTHWEST SOUTHEAST 20 I 41 (CHANGE I COANGE CHANGE Twin U;tks Page 5 TABLE III INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS KENNEDY DRIVE AND DORSET STREET TOTAL VEHICLE 1977 ADDITIONAL VOLUME (PH) PEAK CAPACITY APPROACH MOVEMENT PHV Twin Oaks HOUR G/C VPiI V/C VOLUME DORSET ST. St. 130 130 (North) Lt. 171 20 191 43% 648 0.80 Rt. 206 206 527 KENNEDY DR. St. 356 -- 336 43% 1060 0.59 (East) Lt. 84 -- 84 Rt. 183 623 DORSET ST. St. 112 -- 112 43% 600 0.42 (South) Lt. 2 -- 2 Rt. 117 20 137 251 1-89 St. 339 54 393 43% 639 0.90 (West) Lt. 178 -- 178 Rt. 6 -- 6 577 i Twin Oaks TABLE III (continued) ' Page 5 -continued !I INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS KENNEDY DRIVE AND RT. 116 I TOTAL VEHICLE 1977 ADDITIONAL VOLUME (PH) PEAK CAPACITY 1' APPROACH MOVEMENT PHV Twin Oaks HOUR G/C VPH VPC VOLUME TABLE - KENNEDY DRIVE AND RT. 116 RT. 116 St. 199 -- 199 31% 348 1.42 (Northwest) Lt. 38 -- 38 Rt. 256 -- 256 493 KENNEDY DR. St. 436 41 477 47% 958 0.58 (Northeast) Lt. 43 -- 43 Rt. 38 -- 38 ! 558 Rt. 116 St. 58 -- 58 31% 413 r 0.39 (Southeast) Lt. 32 -- 32 Rt. 70 -- 70 160 KENNEDY DR. St. 415 -- 415 47% 1215 0.57 (West) Lt. 147 -- 147 Rt. 141 -- 141 703 V/C = Volume/Capacity; G/C - Percentage Green Seconds per signal cycle; VPC - Vehicle per hour l ; PHV = Peak Hour Volume 1. Source: Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, Urban Transportation Study, 1976. [ f Twin Oaks page 6 D. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Volume per capacity ration (Table III) indicate that the Twin Oaks development will not create an unstable level of traffic flow (V/C = 1.0) at any of the inter- section approaches analyzed. However, the I-89 exit ramp at Dorset Street would be close to saturation (V/C = 0.90). It is presently not wide enough to permit an adequate two lane approach to the intersection, although two lane queues of two to four vehicles do occur. Flows are restricted by the large percentage of left turning vehicles from this approach, which create a high level of conflict with vehicles leaving Kennedy Drive. A separate left turn lane would dramatically increase the capacity of this approach. Temporary alleviation of the problem could be achieved by changing the green cycle to reflect the higher V/C ratio for I-89 and Kennedy Drive approaches. A G/C ratio of 41% for Dorset Street and 45% for I-89 would create V/C ratios of 0.85 or under for all approaches. An unstable level of peak hour service already exists along the Rt. 116 north- west approach to Kennedy Drive. However, traffic generated by the Twin Oaks Apartments would not significantly contribute to the problem. As in the case above, increasing the green cycle for this approach would relieve congestion considerably. Twin Oaks APPENDIX A REFERENCES TO TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA Appendix A page 1 _ t I� - - " = INTERSTATE r��•-EDERAL •410 PRIMARY 1 '•'-• Fr ERAL AID PdIMART EXTENSION f N FEDERAL AID SECONDARY FEDERAL AID. URBAN SYSTEM - EXISTING ,r �' • --•n I FEDERAL AID URBAN SYSTEM - PROPOSE. NON FEDERAL AID STREETS U. S NUMBERED ROUTE `S STATE NUMBERED ROUTE Ir F A U. UNITS IV R TOWN BOUNDARY TOWti.- —ems •\ `` /� - KU. .B9 COLCHESTER �" .,� • , 1 r-3,70 SK •'\ � CITYOF � ��- • �•,••y � ��. y. �•. ••i. �_ BURLINGTON I'soao ..� g740 -1 / I / �•:;� \ �'�ss_... 4-3 \�• /� 4900. j:``•-' - _ 93io .�..��,' / IR OS r • •:•�:,\�i 11] • ": _ _IT �• Tim � ''' S�•O ,•.. \� CITY4. Y� t•'�_ 'L'_`l'. - 3}�5O^ 42 t !• J / OF / VILLAGE \,. • 7'J 29.44C0., .)�� \\:/ •�'%— S`OUT4 BURLI`:GTON ! OF,._ •\` �. •'` •..�"9y�yoj�1 / % �__- ESSEX J:.:C 3530 kit , \ j a •'r.'si ►es:s'` �, - • 2rso. `"`�� - , ♦ • .. \ / NT `CF BURL :`:3-DV ri i ,' : t _• ; zeeao_iT�r e,• •rs-D. '.� "i :r-E eeer ova: RT \ �--'L•—`ems_...___ _i5730 IL 9=9 -mil 'L.. ' r •1��=1 - ,1 64601 .557C rl -S. . - •• r a Se70 27Qi�- 7-ia1 eo r--IJI• . 870 IT— :? -<OACO s �- AVERAGE WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUME - 1976 'C�- VEHICLES PER DAY -14$- FIGURE 30 L Source: Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, Urban Transportation Study, 1976 %=■ TURNING MOVEMENT DATA SHEET Appendix 'Bk VERMONT HIGHWAY PLANNING DIVISION page 2 TRAFFIC RESEARCH SECT. DIR PC T TOT DIR PC T TOT DIR PC I T TOT HR I /37 z /39 -138 G 44 18 Z I 20 /2 /28 // /39 47 Z 49 9 — 9 /3 106 2 /08 49 4 S3 11 /24 4 /26 Gq - 69 10 /Z(S 4 /130 99 Z lot 19 3 — 63 94 - ­t4 zZ 1 Z3 /7 -10 q z3 72'7 -PC-TT ( TOT DIR NORTH 78 8 8G 7Z �,3 7S' /S3 I L3 /S8 S'98 33 1 G3/ TOT j PC I T TOT DIR //4 /z Z /4S /8 /!d3 zo3 9 Zc I 7 Z/O 947 I 7Z I /U/9 TOT PC T TOT DIR 23 Z9 I Z 3: 3/1Z SS ( Z S 7 7 I Z 7Z s/ / sz I 3797 1 39�, 114 { 410 n ^N d /679 9V+ � Z l . Q a CODE. No.: PLACE: so. L�••/•.� won E A 6 L iLa � O 'u W Q _. Ck 89 .3 9 Z DIR PC T TOT HR tl Z 13 /3 1Cn I 11 19 - 14 /G 1 5 - 15 /7 TOT 9 1 1 4 `15 - DIR PC I T TOT I Hk IITG 9 Ies /Z ys 13 I 16 147 /3 IZ9 13 14Z 14 co � '/.vr'OY G/.Pf. If-4 14 9 zo 3 13 2.140 /4 0 2 /Zo 7_ 19Z 19 � 211 /7 z4S SOT 97S 84 1os DIR PC T TOT THR 8 4 /z /z 7 /o / 7 A3 4 8 /Z /f / 7 4 /.1 1 / /S 1/7 j PC: All Passenger cars and 2-axle,4.-fire trucksil ' z59 9 2e-8 j TOT :Medium and heavy trucks and busses. TOT ! GD 1,31 91 _ -T DIR PC T I o DIR PC ' T I TOT DIR PC I T T07 JHR ± 33 Q 25 / zG 4Z .3 -4S S I /Z /7 /3 8 / 9 37 7 /Z /9 /4 1 o z 9 9 7 /G le- 1 W y z z zo Z Z Z /S i7 C V � N z Trvr I .o /ttA TC]T !1I 4 `C 3 . {� , �•• .1� �} L�1I1 ~ ,,; n.j • •.11•.1••.M•1r•�r.w �',w• Ir Y1•.• `� c� '' 1 � 1 I cvl � � 1 . •,Iw•1••Mr•w •J rr11• IM ww+wM ° •M � nl S�I� c��� c�� '� •1 ••,•w•+w •• �' . w• N 1 f • N••I•M ••,•w •• • �.��..` NI ••Iw MI• w � • w/w •.w, w ..\••w�•... rwww I_Y�•/wM to ..1 •I `^ 1''0 ,��.1 \•.I,� ,cc'':f t\ 21� r�.l•••''1 \�•.•I'�\�1.•� �, N ' Iw.• r t�� h �� N r: •I,M rr,w..•l •Iwr .... w11• wlw 1.//• r Mn ._ qz MM /r/.1 wM wll• ... •wlr. wl•• wM .Ir. 1► I! I I 1 1 I •M •Ir• •I_• r •w r• •1 •. w• ..•/. ••_• 11! Inl , _• ++II 1 �1 •.L., . ./,,. ••r• L I.wrlr_ \ •r r/./. w,r•� • •rr _wr •1••r. •Ir••IrNr• wl_ •..• r••• "'M .... ,• • ,•1•• . r 1 ' r .• � �' • 'ter � • TWIN OAKS Page 1 ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF THE TWIN OAKS APARTMENTS ON INTERSECTION TRAFFIC CAPACITIES A. SCOPE OF THE STUDY This study has been prepared for Twin Oaks Associates and the City of South Burlington in order to determine the effect of the Twin Oaks Apartments development upon traffic movement along Kennedy Drive, specifically at the Kennedy Drive -Dorset Street and Kennedy Drive-Rte. 116 intersections. Eventual recommendations for changes in intersection control will be relative to the specific intersection only, and will not consider the effect of those changes in the general traffic pattern of the area. B. ANALYSIS OF PRESENT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 1. Description of Intersections. The various physical factors influencing the flow of traffic through the intersections are presented in Table I below. Both the Kennedy Drive -Dorset Street and Kennedy Drive-Rte 116 intersections are controlled by fixed cycle three phase traffic signals. All four approaches to the Kennedy Drive -Dorset Street intersection have right turn lanes with directional arrows. These were added in the fall of 1975 and were reflected in the calculation of intersection capacities contained in the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission Urban Transportation Study. The right turn on red law became effective in South Burlington on July 1, 1977, and would increase the previously used capacity standards for these intersections. However, these in- creases are not clearly quantifiable and are not considered in this study. TWIN OAKS Page 2 ;RSECTION DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS ;EN fE ;) LEFT TURN SIGNAL RIGHT TURN ON RED ON STREET PARKING PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS DESIGN * ADEQUACY r REMARKS o NO ES NO SEE GOOD LOCATION OF HIGH SCHOOL REMARKS MAY CAUSE INCREASED CONGESTION DUE TO PEDESTRIANS IN FUTURE NO YES NO SEE FAIR TO SOUTH APPROACH HAS REMARKS GOOD APPROX. 10% GRADE NO YES NO INSIGNIF. GOOD NO YES NO INSIGNIF. GOOD .% NO YES NO INSIGNIF. GOOD CURB CUTS NEAR INTERSECTION TWIN OAKS Page 3 2. 1977 Traffic Volumes Traffic counts for both intersections were obtained from the Vermont Department of Highways. (See Appendix A) These were one day, six hour turning movements surveys conducted on August 23, 1977 for the Kennedy Drive-Rte. 116 intersection, and on December 2, 1975 at Dorset Street and Kennedy Drive. These volumes have been updated and recomputed to 1977 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and Peak Hour (PHV) volumes according to Department of Highway formulas and are presented in Table -1AL,_UE C. PROJECTED TRAFFIC INCREASES FROM THE TWIN OAKS APARTMENTS PROJECT Traffic generated by the Twin Oaks Apartments has been forecast according to the standard of one (1) vehicle trip per dwelling unit at peak hour. Of these, 0.75 were vehicles returning to the develop- ment, and 0.25 were exiting. Only the former were considered in this study. Assumptions as to the origin of these return trips were based on the location of major employment centers and commercial development in the Greater Burlington area, including the Digital Industrial Complex. Briefly, the I-89 approach to Kennedy Drive and Dorset Street was as- signed primary importance (40% of additional traffic), while Dorset Street North (15%) and Dorset Street South (15%) and Kennedy Drive East of Rte 116 (30%) were of secondary importance. The distribution of additional vehicle trips within the intersections is shown in Table II and Table III. n TWIN OAKS Page 4 V OF ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC ERSECTION APPROACHES ' .lEET KENNEDY DRIVE — RTE. 116 ST. IDORSET ST. KENNEDY DR.IKENNEDY DR. I RTE. 116 1 RTE. 116 SOUTH WEST EAST NORTHWEST I SOUTHEAST 20 I 41 ICHANGE I CHHANCE I CHANGE . 40 Twin U;iks Page 5 TABLE III INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS KENNEDY DRIVE AND DORSET STREET TOTAL VEHICLE 1977 ADDITIONAL VOLUME (PH) PEAK CAPACITY APPROACH MOVEMENT PHV Twin Oaks HOUR G/C VPH V/C VOLUME 4 DORSET ST. St. 130 130 (North) Lt. 171 20 191 43% 648 0.80 Rt. 206 206 527 KENNEDY DR. St. 356 -- 336 43% 1060 0.59 (East) Lt. 84 -- 84 Rt. 183 623 DORSET ST. St. 112 -- 112 43% 600 0.42 (South) Lt. 2 -- 2 Rt. 117 20 137 251 1-89 St. 339 54 393 43% 639 0.90 (West) Lt. 178 -- 178 Rt. 6 -- 6 577 TABLE III (continued) INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS KENNEDY DRIVE AND RT. 116 Twin Oaks Page 5 -continued ___..._ - - _ ----•--- - TOTAL VEHICLE 1977 ADDITIONAL VOLUME (PH) PEAK CAPACITY 1' APPROACH MOVEMENT PHV Twin Oaks HOUR G/C VPH VPC VOLUME TABLE - KENNEDY DRIVE AND RT. 116 RT. 116 St. 199 -- 199 31% 348 1.42 (Northwest) Lt. 38 -- 38 Rt. 256 -- 256 493 KENNEDY DR. St. 436 41 477 47% 958 0.58 (Northeast) Lt. 43 -- 43 Rt. 38 -- 38 558 Rt. 116 St. 58 -- 58 31% 413 I 0.39 (Southeast) Lt. 32 -- 32 Rt. 70 -- 70 160 ftt KENNEDY DR. St. 415 -- 415 47% 1215 0.57 f i (West) Lt. 147 -- 147 Rt. 141 -- 141 703 E V/C = Volume/Capacity; G/C - Percentage Green Seconds per signal cycle; VPC - Vehicle per hour PHV = Peak Hour Volume 1. Source: Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, Urban Transportation Study, 1976. E E Twin Oaks page 6 0 D. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Volume per capacity ration (Table III) indicate that the Twin Oaks development will not create an unstable level of traffic flow (V/C = 1.0) at any of the inter- section approaches analyzed. However, the I-89 exit ramp at Dorset Street would be close to saturation (V/C = 0.90). It is presently not wide enough to permit an adequate two lane approach to the intersection, although two lane queues of two to four vehicles do occur. Flows are restricted by the large percentage of left turning vehicles from this approach, which create a high level of conflict with vehicles leaving Kennedy Drive. A separate left turn lane would dramatically increase the capacity of this approach. Temporary alleviation of the problem could be achieved by changing the green cycle to reflect the higher V/C ratio for I-89 and Kennedy Drive approaches. A G/C ratio of 41% for Dorset Street and 45% for I-89 would create V/C ratios of 0.85 or under for all approaches. An unstable level of peak hour service already exists along the Rt. 116 north- west approach to Kennedy Drive. However, traffic generated by the Twin Oaks Apartments would not significantly contribute to the problem. As in the case above, increasing the green cycle for this approach would relieve congestion considerably. Twin Oaks APPENDIX A REFERENCES TO TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA Appendix A page 1 a-- INTERSTATE .•ems-COERAL -AID PRIMARY t •-'^�++. FEDERAL AID PafMARY EXTENSION - IN FEDERAL AID SECONDARY FEDERAL AID. URBAN SYSTEM - EXISTING •;+••N .\ FEDERAL AID URBAN SYSTEM - PROPOSE. �I NON FEDERAL AID STREETS •`a\`- `Y 1 U.S NUMBERED ROUTE r `S STATE NUMBERED ROUTE 1 FA. U. LIMITS \ R - - - - - TOINN BOUNDARY \ -X. R-VE v 7 I TOWN.'' �- -.--:� , i COLCHESTER ,-.� •• ��/ rro - i O �•i CITY:-WiN00 SKI �1\ ..v. N.n c••wr of �.� e: � �� � � � 7� � �'�� : ` ^•\� '- ��• ^•►. �\ BURLINGTOV l�3040 `•\ 2a•A 5j//�,E�l'77"-� \ �s f. j. �e.r . /� \% \ t fR°' ✓ 4900 .:•':-c �\� _�- -� 'a'>.^ Asa .e/ . rr 1 r' = ^�� T IC. ♦3C_ _ti `350 a2D z , `� OF i VILLA' GE ' `o '44CO y 1�\ \��_ f ,1-�— '� SOUTH BURLI -5 TOY J OF . ��� .\- • �.�y \' �i - CI •e]J�+•-•�} �s.59' - ��. 3490 \• / , 13530 / ~�--- i ESSEX JuNC7.07: OXzi °_ cryl:.°:;EVENT � r-'—' :i::cl r� �`'�'Y• � '. �� .'.- r--•� _ 'r 4F BUR! `:3'` NTH ii j =', ['E:' �T/ram'.. V'i NSr • :1� /'' 30 --'•:� L — lit Yi -7L4's (9e::. ,N ��•,9^�y.. Imo.; xl ;J .. 1 ��_ F - I '- .- .bSJC _ yil .s5• �. 7+ rS' 23Qi . :/ Tot► asco — J P c a / •• '� ` ! AVERAGE WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUME - 1976 - VEHICLES PER DAY -148- FIGURE 30 Source: Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, Urban i Transportation Study, 1976 f TURNING MOVEMENT DATA SHEET Appendix SBA VERMONT HIGHWAY PLANNING DIVISION page 2 TRAFFIC RESEARCH SECT. CODE. NO.: PLACE: �• L��/.� �{,� I� DIR PC T TOT DIR PC T TOT DIR PC T TOT H;t I /3 7 z /3 9 I 38 G 44 18 z 20 /2 /28 9 47 Z 49 9 - 9 /,3 /O G Z /08 49 4 153 11 /24 4 / a <-- 9 - • ca9 to - ►o /s /Z6 4 A?0 99 Z lot 19 3 - 83 94 — -14 7- 1 z3 /7 -IDq z3 PC T I TOT DIR 96 6 /o4 -7a 8 Be, /163 1 / I /d ¢ 7z 7S dj S96 133 I G3/ TOT PC ( T TOT DIR /-of9 j 20 /69 - /,32 /o /4,3 /i4 /415- /8 /e,3 203 9 2/z- t1 ZO3 I 7 Z/d 947 I 7Z ,019 TOT PC I T TOT DIR i z3 - I Z3 z9 I Z 3; ,3/ 'F�3 ss 1 Z S 7 —) 7 I Z 7Z .s/ / I s-z z s9 9 I 2G,3 j TOT DIR PC T + 2S / I 8 / — � 3S - i — z I 7Z7 396 I 14 I 410 NORTH 3797 Z►43 k 89 3 9 z DIR PC T TOT HR • zo I 21 /2 II z 13 /3 19 - 1 4 /G 1 S - 15 /7 TOT 91 1 4 DIR PC T 9 s 131 rG /z11s 129 r3 GO 1(-4 14 1. ZO 3 13 4A /207 197- 19 z4S 95- TOT I Hk r&s /z 147 /3 14 Z /4 118 / 2.1 to /G 211 /7 SOTI 97S 184 1 105 DIR I PC T I TOT HR 8 4 /Z - /2 7 /0 / 7 A3 '¢ 8 /Z / 7 4 /4( / PC: All Passenger cars and 2-axle,4.-tire trucks) : Medium and heavy trucks and busses. TOT i GO 31 91 �T 1 TOT DIR PC ! T I TOT DIR PC I T TOT JHR Q Q m W v N Z 1 2! L 33 i / 34- 8 1 43 /6 1 /Z ZG 4Z 3 -4 S S / Z 17 /3 9 37 7 /Z 19 14 — zi - z/ z // 1 /3 /S _ z 9 9 7 /G 1/4 Z- zo Z ZZ /o S /S i7 o TAT I • G a /AA TnT A j I _iG- Q 1 4� 1 l l tNa fL1 ... .na •I• nu, • ur .� .� , ''`� N y1 ) ro N ^ \ r J �. cV d� 1 r o d N O 11 \ �V 0.�i r� �% , • �� fj -+ :fr w . ,MI• •rl ww1 Il r. r� ••y• •IIr r _w• •••Y .,1M ww• .. •IW NI11 N.w r•w MM •I.11 IwY y1M .•w INw LN1Mr++r •11.1• •11• ' ,I ' ' • L I .� 1_4 ro 1 I 1 (I I I 1 I (r a wu �N �: (� �L1.I co L.1 , • `� ��;; ri r� 'w C /-78 7 t! t • : till iiI -.•;I .. { 1 ,: : `,J \o':y In: ,, \ �;, °, "', , n '.1.: •' + ;' �..'"' J�. r t I , DU r •. LI .- f r.} .. ��.�. � •.• �I . illlll U I 11•'F :.' ✓\���'. 4' ✓� .Y • • I' :`'� �•.` �u, 1'% `'�: �\ , �� .t� � v •,, 14 J f . � A)r I i ' � G I f f � Its' I I N'I t � ' \• I � � Sti' �t �' �� . �. . D (tJ I(a �� �� „� � ;�• ,' Lr v C..I t J • ' f) es CJ C� >r h tV v it1 �! t rn �� �n o tV \f.p 0 tv rV 1 1v ('� N fV •�; IR) .1 ���` lT l' Ill C) •ti �' ._....•....... �i. �� 'kJ •.. .._L.. Y..4.. I rd.....,.rw• , ...r r••.lun, .ul,�ww•wl, l,r w.iww,•,y 1... ••! ... • I A n C l tojiV �� IV f• o �Y�v IN I (I I u t� �� �,� �,, �v I\ ' i N, \ I �� I; • �,� Ilt ��• c�' v � �,w, to N I� �� �J -7- PLEASE DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE NO. Filed: (Location) (Date) Signature of Coordinator/Com. Member 1. Name, address and phone number of the person seeking this permit? Twin Oaks Associates, Route 100, Waitsfield, Vermont 05673 2. Name, address and phone number of the person to be contacted regarding this application? (Complete this only if different from #1 above.) A. J. Babcock (same address as above) 802-496-3121 Michael S. Ram (same address as above) 802-496-3121 3. Describe the project briefly including its location, type, number of units, lots, etc. Indicate the high and low elevations and outline the tract of land on a county highway map and attach the map to this form. Twin Oaks Apartments will be located in So. Burlington, Vermont, off Kennedy Drive. The project will consist of 180 rental units. High Elevation: 320' above sea level Low Elevation: 265' above sea level 4. Give the address of each of the applicant's offices in Vermont, if any. Same as item #1 above. 5. Does the applicant own the tract of land in fee simple? If not, what is the applicant's legal interest in the land, what is the name and address IBM of the owner? Applicant has an option agreement with Burlington Indoor Tennis Association, the present owners. When did the applicant acquire ownership or control of the land? Applicant will own land after permits & financing established. 6. If the applicant is not applying as an individual, what kind of legal entity is the applicant filing as, e.g. partnership, corporation, etc., and the date and place the legal entity was formed. (Foreign corpora- tions must supply the date they registered with the Secretary of State for the State of Vermont, and the name of the person upon whom legal processes are to be served.) Twin Oaks Associates is a partnership. 7. a. How ri,any acres are in the entire tract of land? In answering this, include the total acreage of the landowner. 39.9 Acres b, flow many acres are directly involved in this project? 35.1 Acres 8. On the back side of this page, write in the names and addresses of all adjoining property owners. If you are not the landowner, list the names and addresses of all property owners adjoining the landowner's tract of land. 9. When do you plan to begin this project? Spring 1978 When will this project be completed? Spring 1980 10. Attach, when applicable, a copy of: restrictive covenants to be used in deeds, restrictive provisions set forth in leases, bylaws of condominium associations, or any other restrictions. ME 11. Financing: a. Excluding the cost of the land, what is the total cost of the project? $2.7 MILLION Applicants for subdivisions should include cost of any improvements, such as roads, ponds, etc. b. How will this project be funded, what financing has been obtained, and what additional financing will be necessary? HUD Insured Mortgage Program 221 D (4) c. If performance bonds will be required of contractors, attach details of the bonds. 12. What municipal services do you intend to utilize? X police; X fire protection; solid waste disposal; X road maintenance; X sewage disposal; X water supply; other. (explain). 13. Will this project involve any of the following: (check those that apply.) a. Fuel burning equipment c. Incinerators b. Process equipment d. Air pollution control equipment NOTE: Complete 14 and 15 below only when instructed to do so by a district coordina- tor. 14. I/we hereby certify and affirm under oath that I/we have notified by personal service or by certified mail, return receipt requested, the parties entitled to notice of my/our application pursuant to Title 10 VSA, §6084, as follows: (Each of the parties get a complete application, including plans): South Burlington, Vermont, Williston Road Game and Address of Municipality) South Burlington Planning Commission c4o Steve Page ame an dress o Municipal Planning Commission Chittenden Count Regional Planning Commission, Essex Junction, Vt. Name and ess of RegionalPlanningCommission) gnature 8/29/77 SSP SUGGEST - OTI:IN OF APPROVAL - BU:RLINC�TON INDOOR TENNIS CENTER. INC. I move that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat of Burlington Indoor Tennis Center, Inc., for sub- division of a parcel of 39.9 acres into two lots of 35.1 and 4.F acres; as depicted on a plan entitled "Site Plan - Twin Oaks Apart- ments', dated 7/30/77, prepared by Landplan, Inc., subject to the following stipulations: 1) The roadway to be dedicated to the City shall include an easement to the Bergtier property (at its southeast corner) and an extension of the right of way south 200' and west 1001. along the northwest corner of lot #1 so as to provide access to the planned entrance to the Brand broperty condominiums. 2) The deed for the roadway and associated land shall include the pumping station. t,, Mate of VertI t OCT � an Department of Fish and Game Department of Forests and Parks Department of Water Resources Environmental Board Division of Environmental Protection Division of Recreation Division of Planning Natural Resources Conservation Council AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION MARTIN L. JOHNSOIN, Secretary DEPARTMENT OF FORESTS AND PARKS P. 0. Box 132 Essex Junction, VT 05452 September 29, 1977 Stephen B. Sease RECEIVED Land Use Administrator Agency of Environmental Conservation OCT t 1917 Montpelier, Vermont 05602 MANAGER'S OFFICE RE: Application #4CO294 CITY 4 ' iRLINGTON Twin Oaks Associates (A. J. Babcock) Apartment complex in South Burlington Site Description: This proposal is located off Kennedy Drive in South Burlington adjacent to the Burlington Indoor Tennis Center 01IC0075). Soils are primarily Hinesburg, with Covington @ cluster IV and swamp adjacent to Kennedy Drive. Most of the area is open, rolling meadow, bisected by a northerly -running dry gully. Woodland between the proposed buildings and the swamp is primarily red oak and red maple. Woodland in the vicinity of cluster IV is pole-sawlog white pine. Lands to the east are a medical complex and condominiums, to the south is a stream and I-89 beyond, and to the west (beyond the Tennis Center) is pasture. Plans & Comments: I have inspected the site and reviewed the project with Michael Ram. Municipal water supply and sewage disposal will be utilized. There will be extensive earthmoving associated with this project, indicating a need for proper erosion control. In addition to Mr. Maclay's recommendations, it would be wise to minimize the area to be disturbed at any one time. The gully which bisects the property will remain largely undisturbed and is designated to receive most storm water. Although the gully receives much storm run-off in its natural state, the increased velocity of discharges as a result of this development may initiate erosion in the bottom of the gully. Appropriate rip -rap would prevent such erosion. The energy dissipator proposed at each discharge point is the Stephen B. Sease Page 2 September 29, 1977 W0294 first such structure proposed in an Act 250 project in Chittenden County. The Regional Engineer has indicated that this structure is superior in design and performance to a rip -rapped apron. The public street exists to the NE corner of the Tennis Center property, and will be extended through the project to the east line. The project has been reivewed by the local governmental bodies. The project site is highly visible from I-89, especially the South -bound lane, indicating the importance of aesthetic considerations. Of specific concern are: the landscaping potential between building; 9B and the power line, loss of existing trees at buildings 10A and 11C, and long-term maintenance guarantee of the landscaping. Building; 9B is shown to be within two feet of the edge of the power line R.O.W. This will not allow for the planting of large trees - such plantings being an absolute necessity at that particular point. Buildings 10A and 11C with associated parking areas will destroy most of the best grove of trees on the site. The site of 10A is presently a stand of white pine in excess of 12" diameter, with a park -like atmosphere. In addition to its internal qualities, it could, if left intact, act as a visual buffer between the apartments and I-89. As the site plan shows, 11C and its parking will eliminate a fair portion of this grove, however, the trees are smaller and thicker. I would strongly recommend that the Agency take the position that cluster III be redesigned to eliminate building 10A (relocate it elsewhere in the project) and that a specific portion of the existing; stand of trees remain undisturbed, said undisturbed area to be fixed in a field conference of interested parties. As with other projects of high visibility I would recommnd that the applicant guarantee the character of the landscaping for an extended period. Other aesthetic considerations include building design and lighting. It appears that this proposal includes buildings of the same design as those in Indian Brook apartments in Essex Junction. There was no mention of outside lighting in the application, however, the lighting plan should be discussed. Most of the proposed development area is primary agricultural soil. The building plans show R-19 insulation the exterior walls and insulation of approximately R-30 (9 Z ked fiberglass) in ceilings. Advisor RSR:mis cc:Curt Carter A. J. Babcock OFFICE OF THE COMM16'+IONER STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS MONTPELI ER 05002 October 3, 1977 Act 250 Administrator Agency of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Protection Montpelier, Vermont 05602 NOTICE OF APPLICATION TO ENVIRON^9ENTAL DISTRICT Re:_ App. #4CO294, Twin Oaks Associates, South Burlington T Dear Sir: Pursuant to the provisions of Act 250 of the 1970 Legislature, Environmental Board and District Commissions, the Department of Highways has reviewed the above -referenced Notice and offers the following: No adverse comment This agency may have a program affected by this project and indicates interest as follows: City of South Burlington should monitor traffic generated by the phasing of this development, with a view toward requiring necessary traffic controls when needed. Attach. cc: District Engineer Wood Sincerely, Ronald E. W. Crisman Acting Commissioner By: d. 9� Chief igi eer S IA -I L Of 4 LRMONT AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION INTERAGENCY ACT 250 REVIEW COMMITTEE RE: Twin Oaks Associates ) DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION Apartment Complex ) South Burlington ) APPLICATION #4CO294 RECEIVED OCTOBER 5, 1977 aC T 61977 Entry of Appearance CMY GAGERS OFFICE ' �4LINC3 rc�1V Please enter the appearance of the Agency of Environmental Conservation State of Vermont in the above captioned matter. PRE -HEARING COMMENTS Enclosed are comments of the Environmental Advisor and the Vermont Department of Highways. The two principal areas of concern with this application appear to be primary agricultural soils and aesthetics. The applicant must demonstrate that it does not own or control nonagricultural or secondary agricultural soils which are reasonably suited to the purpose and that the development has been planned to minimize or reduce agricultural potential either by providing for reasonable population densities and rates of growth or through new community planning and economization of land usage. The Act 250 Review Committee supports the comments of the Advisor with regard to aesthetics. I-89 is under a great deal of development pressure in Chittenden County. The District Commission must insure that the aesthetics of the highway are preserved. The Environmental Advisor has made specific recommendations with regard to relocation of buildings which should be addressed by the developer and Commission. An exterior lighting plan should be submitted. The Act 250 Review Committee feels that a site inspection of the proposed development by the District Environmental Commission would help it to understand more clearly the issue of aesthetics and the need for careful landscaping and preservation of natural vegetation on the site. I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing NOTRY OF APPEARANCE and PRE -HEARING COMMENTS was sent by U.S. Mail (Postage Prepaid) to all statutory parties. Dated on this 5th day of October, 1977 at Montpelier, Vermont. Respectfully submitted, AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION INTERAGENCY ACT 250 REVIEW COMMITTEE By Stephel B. Sease cc: Jim Sairs I --w M&-a -- M-4-1 "TWIN OAKS ABUTTORS" Howard Brand Box 242 Essex Junction, VT Thelma Tilley c/o Mary Barbara Maher Aruth.t7.SBergner 660 Hinesburg Road 134 Pro$?ect Parkway Burlington,VT Aesculapius, Inc. 1 TimberLane Salisbury Realty Hlldings Carl W. Schwenn 15 Timber Lane LA qn 40 43 H j Co U C) —I C, F.A to C) n 1 CO 10 r4 4-D -P C) ,j ;> C-- -4-:1 40 V 43 f % C) C) rji S--; U) 0 4-� Cl) 4-1 -P -! U ! to 0 C-" -r-i cl C) cj CID 0 10 > CO L6 0 4 C, --I -j C-1 Q) c) 0, 0. (D 0 Tol, C) '' 4-) 4-Da C-) cj GO r!) - -P (1) C) C) P 4-) lia ci cl, -P C—i 4 3 yj 01 10 1 (H 0 c U U) Ij 'I F- I JI r- a , C6 CD w GO r rJ ci H —4 F-I " C) -ice F-i -rl F-I Q,) co 'C' C) fib 0) —1 4-) �) Q Qy 00 C-) SOUTH BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT 555 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 Richard G. Carter, Chief Telephone 658-1050 March 18, 1977 William B. Wessel, Chairman South Burlington Planning Commission South Burlington, Vermont Dear Sir: The South Burlington Police Department is presently operating at its maximum for the size of our City. The new developments, Horizon Heights and Twin Oaks, will seriously over -tax our present capabilities to efficiently enforce the law and protect life and property. It is my opinion that these new developments will make it imparative that the department be expanded, not only in personnel, but in equipment, dramatically and immediately. Ve truly yours, Richard G. Carter RGC:mb Memorandum - Next meeting's agenda items November 4, 1977 zZ Page II Country Park Apartments (Elderly Housting) - Revised Final Plat This is a revision of the final plat approved April 26, 1977. There are two major changes: First, the 100 units are now located in 3 buildings (4 previously) and secondly, the projected is being divided into 2 phases, 76 units and 24 units. Also, a deceleration lane, which will improve access,has,been shown. Utilities will be reviewed again so that, among other things, water lines may be extended to the west and south property lines. I assume the community building and bus stop will be retained in the center island. Parking spaces have been reduced from 88 in the previous plan to 63 - if a waiver is granted, a minimum of 75 must be shown. The construction of the second phase should be subject to restrictions which have been applied to other multi phase projects. Twin Oaks - Revised Final Plat Revisions to this plan include: 1) Total of 184 units (formerly 180) and 7 addition parking spaces. 2) More 1 and 2 bedroom units, fewer 3 bedroom units. 3) Buildings on the south edge of the project have been relocated to save more existing trees. These changes generally improve the project. 1... - .__ Leisure Architects Warren, Vermont 12 September 1977 Mr. Stephen Page South Burlington Planning Commission South Burlington, Vermont Dear Steve: Recreational Marketing and Planning 131 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109 Telephone (617) 723-3226 Union Brook Road Northfield, Vermont 05663 Telephone (802) 485-7749 We are pleased to submit herewith the traffic impact study prepared for the Twin Oaks Apartments Project by Land Plan, Inc. The study relies on data supplied by the Vermont Department of Highways, Traffic Research Division, the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, as well as information supplied by your office. The conclusions are in regard to the effect of the Twin Oaks Apartments project only. Recommendations for improving traffic flow consider movements within the specific intersections only, without regard to the overall traffic pattern of the area. We feel that the results of the study show that the Twin Oaks Apartments project will not create traffic volumes that exceed the capacities of the intersections and roadways involved. Respectfully yours, TWIN OAKS ASSOCIATES Judson Babcock /LAN, NC i I onald R. Swain TWIN OAKS Page 1 ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF THE TWIN OAKS APARTMENTS ON INTERSECTION TRAFFIC CAPACITIES A. SCOPE OF THE STUDY This study has been prepared for Twin Oaks Associates and the City of South Burlington in order to determine the effect of the Twin Oaks Apartments development upon traffic movement along Kennedy Drive, specifically at the Kennedy Drive -Dorset Street and Kennedy Drive-Rte. 116 intersections. Eventual recommendations for changes in intersection control will be relative to the specific intersection only, and will not consider the effect of those changes in the general traffic pattern of the area. B. ANALYSIS OF PRESENT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 1. Description of Intersections. The various physical factors influencing the flow of traffic through the intersections are presented in Table I below. Both the Kennedy Drive -Dorset Street and Kennedy Drive-Rte 116 intersections are controlled by fixed cycle three phase traffic signals. All four approaches to the Kennedy Drive -Dorset Street intersection have right turn lanes with directional arrows. These were added in the fall of 1975 and were reflected in the calculation of intersection capacities contained in the Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission Urban Transportation Study. The right turn on red law became effective in South Burlington on July 1, 1977, and would increase the previously used capacity standards for these intersections. However, these in- creases are not clearly quantifiable and are not considered in this study. IS TWIN OAKS Page 2 TABLE I INTERSECTION STREET TRAVEL LANE WIDTH R.T. LANE L.T. LANE SIGNAL CONTROL -- - - GREEN TIME M LEFT TURN SIGNAL RIGHT TURN ON RED iLl\1J11VJ ON STREET PARKING PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS DESIGN ADEQUACY REMARKS KENNEDY DRIVE (TWO) NO YES F.C. 3 43% NO YES NO SEE GOOD LOCATION OF HIGH SCHOOL (LANE) REMARKS MAY CAUSE INCREASED CONGESTION DUE TO PEDESTRIANS IN FUTURE DORSET STREET (TWO) NO YES F.C. 3# 43% NO YES NO SEE FAIR TO SOUTH APPROACH HAS N. & S. (LANE) REMARKS GOOD APPROX. 10% GRADE I-89 (ONE) (LANE) NO NO F.C. 3� 43% NO YES NO INSIGNIF. GOOD KENNEDY DRIVE (TWO) NO YES F.C. 31 47% NO YES NO INSIGNIF. GOOD E. & W. (LANE) RTE 116 (TWO) NO NO F.C. 3� 31% NO ES NO INSIGNIF. GOOD N. & S. (LANE) * CONSIDERS: ALIGNMENT; GRADIENT; VISIBILITY; NO. OF CURB CUTS NEAR INTERSECTION � FIXED CYCLE, THREE PHASE, NO SIGNAL DELAY Twin Oaks Page 5 TABLE III INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS KENNEDY DRIVE AND DORSET STREET TOTAL VEHICLE 1977 ADDITIONAL VOLUME (PH) PEAK CAPACITY APPROACH MOVEMENT PHV Twin Oaks HOUR G/C VPH V/C VOLUME DORSET ST. St. 130 130 -� (North) Lt. 171 20 191 43% 648 0.80 Rt. _- 206 �206 5'7 527 KENNEDY DR. St. 356 -- 336 43% 1060 0.59 i' (East) Lt. /AA\L? 84/ -- 84 Rt. 183 - -- 183 623 DORSET ST. St. 112 -- 112 43% 600 0.42 (South) Lt. 2 -- 2 Rt. 117 20 137 3 251 I-89 St. 339 54 393 43% 639 0.90 (West) Lt. 178 -- 178 Rt. -- 6 �6 _ 577 TABLE III (continued) INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS KENNEDY DRIVE AND RT. 116 Twin Oaks Page 5 -continued TOTAL VEHICLE 1977 ADDITIONAL VOLUME (PH) PEAK CAPACITY APPROACH MOVEMENT PHV Twin Oaks HOUR G/C VPH 1. VPC VOLUME TABLE - 116 KENNEDY DRIVE AND RT. RT. 116 St. 199 -- 199 31% 348 1.42 (Northwest) Lt. 38 -- 38 Rt. 256 -- 256 493 KENNEDY DR. St. 436 41 477 47% 958 0.58 (Northeast) Lt. 43 -- 43 Rt. 38 -- 38 558 Rt. 116 St. 58 -- 58 31% 413 0.39 (Southeast) Lt. 32 -- 32 Rt. 70 -- 70 160 KENNEDY DR. St. 415 -- 415 47% 1215 0.57 ([lest) Lt. 147 -- 147 Rt. 141 -- 141 703 V/C = Volume/Capacity; G/C - Percentage Green Seconds per signal cycle; VPC - Vehicle per hour PHV = Peak Hour Volume 1. Source: Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, Urban Transportation Study, 1976. Twin Oaks page 6 D. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Volume per capacity ration (Table III) indicate that the Twin Oaks development will not create an unstable level. of traffic flow (V/C = 1.0) at any of the inter- section approaches analyzed. However, the I-89 exit ramp at Dorset Street would be close to saturation (V/C = 0.90). It is presently not wide enough to permit an adequate two lane approach to the intersection, although two lane queues of two to four vehicles do occur. Flows are restricted by the large percentage of left turning vehicles from this approach, which create a high level of conflict with vehicles leaving Kennedy Drive. A separate left turn lane would dramatically increase the capacity of this approach. Temporary alleviation of the problem could be achieved by changing the green cycle to reflect the higher V/C ratio for I-89 and Kennedy Drive approaches. A G/C ratio of 41% for Dorset Street and 45% for I-89 would create V/C ratios of 0.85 or under for all approaches. An unstable level of peak hour service already exists along the Rt. 116 north- west approach to Kennedy Drive. However, traffic generated by the Twin Oaks Apartments would not significantly contribute to the problem. As in the case above, increasing the green cycle for this approach would relieve congestion considerably. Twin Oaks APPENDIX A REFERENCES TO TRAFFIC VOLUME DATA Appendix A page 1 INTERSTATE r�M FEDERAL ,AID PRIMARY -%OERAL AID PRIMARY EXTENSION —'— FEDERAL AID SECOND4RY FEDERAL A10. URBAN SYSTEM — EXISTING j FEDERAL AID URBAN SYSTEM — PROPOSE( - —_— NON FEDERAL AID STREETS `7I U.S NUMBERED ROUTE `3 STATE NUMBERED ROUTE FA U LIMITS — TOWN BOUNDARY y � :03001 1-0 � {,�',' may' zu:•3 �. _:t EN+ A R 3E :'ENT J 1 J CF BURL:14G-01Na _y; Aft _•: I 5750 1 1 22X - • ^� —root J 6250 �� 26kJ i 1 206C0 . 3530 / ��'-- - -� ItESSEX JUNCT.Ot7 �� I \ t 1.E- iPG r -. ' J I -T, 679) 1^s•.. J 900 — � e 0 _7 3370 �-�• a .. 6770 .. . I16 .:.� j• 2A ' f � I e7o • i 33E0 AVERA(jE WEEKDAY TRAFFIC VOLUME - 1976 ,�]- VEHICLES PER DAY -148- FIGURE 30 Source: Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission, Urban Transportation Study, 1976 p 4 - . TURNING MOVEMENT DATA SHEET CODE NC).:- APPendixtBa VERMONT HIGHWAY PLANNING DIVISION PLACE: �/on _ page 2 TRAFFIC RESEARCH SECT. - DIR PC T TOTT DIR PC T TOT DIR PCIT TOT HR i3 7 ,3 9 1,38 co 44 18 z 20 /z /28 // /39 4-1 Z. 49 9 - 9 4-9 4- 53__ fog — ►� - 10 /5 /26 4 /30 99 3 - 88 94 - q4 Z2 f 23 /� j ! ^l0 Q 23 727 PC T 1 TOT DIR NORTH 6 1 /O.r- 73 8G /03 7 Z �3 7S S98 L33 G3/ TOT I PC i T TOT DIR /.33 /0 /443 //4 6 /Z 2 /415- /g /6-3 20,3 ZCD3 I 7 Z,O 947 j 7Z /6/9 TOT PC ! TT TOT DIR 1 Z3 ss ! z 7o z_ s 7 7?- -5-2 ! ! 3797 39(, 1 14 1 Oro Z1�43 �o 0.l � N,vsoy d.Q. 89 3 9 Z DIRRPC3 � T TOT HR 1 21 /z 11 2 13 /3 16 10 - 1#ZIS7 1911-I TOT 9 1 4 9 S _Y DIR PC T TOT 1 HR 131 i G 147 /3 1z9 13 14Z /4 I e4 14 118 / 15-1 ZO 3 13 21 <n 1 /G 19Z 19 ZII 117 , Z95 TOT 1 97S i 84 j in:T11 PC: All passenger cars and 2-axle,4.-tire trucks DIR , PC I T ( TOT HR 8 4 /2 1 /2 7 ,o / T A3 4 8 /Z // / 7 z/ /6 /,i / /S / 7 Z59 `% 2G3 TOT !L T � Medium and heavy trucks and busses. 1 TOT 91 DIR PC T TOT IDIR PC ! T I TOT DIR PC I T TOT HR E j 33 i / .3¢ 8 6 2 S / Z6, 4z z .4 S /Z /7 /3 8 / 9 7 /Z /9 /4 28 ! 29 9 7 /6 /G — Z. z Zo 2 Z Z /v S /S' / 7 TOT L 6 4 93 TOT ,,So S /68 TOT 41 SS 96 r cc N . •M, ,•.I• « ,w, •.r •V ••w• «•w •w•r l.•IN.r. wr •«w,j'•w ,w• .w. .rwrwN.• wl« • •, •• ,� •`« • , �. , , • • 1V rj N \ .i. ' ` �.I • .•I •F 1 I I C0 , t,1 N j � �.J ��j �.,U I lJ' l,R • ram' r �� �j� \ 0�,(.� "'.� •' : w� f�' ri ...r 1 .r► w1�i er..,r.r..� n..•r�..e"' ` 1't I 1'• ` , "Y ,• � W u tt} ,MIIEE I IY I I 1 � j � a : � � w � � �Cu }N �� (,� I� Z iJ co —t , • � <L�' T y _ I t tom..._' �t l �89 �7:` r /_797 {n rn e a CV �� T ti. 1 (1 tv ^1 iv •� �tv !0 N ^t N ,:) i nt ,• 711 14 \1 0 Z ` N �( y^ j v} W ' n 1 1 � \ � `� t ry' •• 3,1 � r ' I/ ,t Y is ry '.�> N I S\`', t,R �I o v TON �_, .« •IN: qY, MrtNY•L•INr nw 11 •• o n! ... NMI,1 re ««J.r YI•t••w1 r.Y..... nr• w.Y ,w• n •Iw1 « •wY Yw . � ' C 1'l' • ' , 1N (I 4 I c jN 1�+ 1� w tJ ,�v Zr r �- r. CL F.4 lb 1 ' 1f1I V ,•wre •41. �. '\ �, !�i • Y •Iu.I wln... P1.11«NI NNH1,(r•.., ....t r , • ,7 r1 (� "� 't1 ... •r.«(•«_ 11 r+1 •w1. �.r1 �••rrlr««, ,• •'• k1 r 11` �` 'ei� ' ' ,N••)••1••I,IIM rMI, .IM•• r.YH.Y � , �\I ly)� +\+ V � �\ 1 � � ` t�1•i(\i {IDS �� h' O � 1 d N � { � :�� CJ S.• t � � r !� , ` r w I•t ` ?� Q November 14, 1977 Mr. A. Judson Babcoc'' T .H.A. l 1hce Valley Professional Center Waitsfield, Vermont 45673 Res Vein Oaks Revised Final Flat Dear 'ir. Babcock: This is to confirm the action of the South Burlington Planning Commission in approving your revised final slat, for T-An Calls Apart- ments (184 units), on November 3, 1977. The minutes of the meeting are enclosed, which specify the conditions of approval. These conditions plus the requirements of the subdivision regulation which are applicable to approved final plats (i.e., plat must b~ recorded Prior to 2/3/79), must be sat- isziad prior to the issuanca of any building permits. i have also enclosed the minutes of the 9/13 and 9,/20 mi�4etings so that a complete and correct list of your approval stipulations. Please call if you have any grestions. Yours truly, Stephen Page Planning 'Assistant SP/mcg 3 Encl