Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Minutes - City Council - 05/15/2017
CITY COUNCIL 15 MAY 2017 The South Burlington City Council held a regular meeting on Monday, 15 May 2017, at 6:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. MEMBERS PRESENT: H. Riehle, Chair; P. Nowak, T. Chittenden, T. Barritt, M. Emery ALSO PRESENT: K. Dorn, City Manager; P. Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning; J. Rabidoux, Public Works Director; I Blanchard, Project Manager; C. Holm; J. Louisos, Planning Commission; S. Reeves, CSWD; P. Stabler, J. Kernan, B. Wilson, C. Frank, B. Nowak 1. Directions on emergency evacuation procedures from conference room: Mr. Dorn provided directions on emergency evacuation. 2. Agenda Review: Additions, deletions or changes in order of agenda items: Mr. Dorn asked to add to item “d” on the Consent Agenda the words “..to Griffin & Griffin.” 3. Comments & Questions from the public not related to the agenda: There were no public comments. 4. Announcements and City Manager’s Report: Council members reported on meetings and events that they had attended. Mr. Dorn: Thanked Council members for attending the ribbon cutting at City Hall. He noted that they are looking at adding windows to upstairs conference rooms. Last week, a meeting was held with agencies to discuss stormwater/wetland issues in City Center. Staff was successful in communicating broader issues. The Affordable Housing Committee is completing it housing replacement plan. The South Burlington Business Association will meet tomorrow. Mr. Dorn and Mr. Hubbard will be meeting with the new Executive Director of Green Mountain Transit. Mr. Wilson noted there will be youth serving on the GMT Board. There will be a Steering Committee meeting on 24 May at 6:30 p.m. at City Hall. The following night, there will be a joint meeting of committee chairs and City Council members to discuss priorities. Dinner will be at 6 p.m. with the meeting following at 7 p.m. 5. Consent Agenda: a. Sign Disbursement b. Approve Minutes for 17 April 2017 c. Approve award of the Oak Creek Village culvert replacement project to Dale E. Percy d. Approve award of construction contract for Bartlett Brook Central Stormwater project to Griffin & Griffin e. Approve Memorandum of Understanding regarding the merger of the Regional Stormwater Education Program and Chittenden County Stream Team and authorize the City Manager to sign all pertinent documents Ms. Emery asked why concrete is so much cheaper from one contract to another. Mr. Rabidoux said it is very hard to determine what goes into a contractor’s bid (e.g., access to lower cost materials, a desire to get known in the area, etc.). Ms. Nowak asked if there are warranties when a project is done. Mr. Rabidoux said there is a one year warranty. Ms. Emery moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Mr. Barritt seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Updates from Councilors’ Committee Assignments: a. Mr. Chittenden noted that CCTA will be meeting tomorrow. He also advised that Bridj is no longer in business. CCTA ridership continues to drop, which is a concern. Mr. Chittenden stressed the importance of “voices” at the next transit study meeting as it is important to rethink how public transit is being provided. Ms. Emery asked if there is access to S. Burlington ridership. Mr. Chittenden will get that information. He did note that ADA ridership in South Burlington is going up. Ms. Nowak cited the importance of provided transit for students from Barre-Montpelier, Johnson, and Rutland now that Bridge is no longer provided that service. Ms. Emery noted a business owner in Burlington who would like to have Middlebury students work for him, but they don’t have transportation. Mr. Barritt expressed concern with the number of one-person cars during the AM peak. He cited the need for small buses. b. Ms. Riehle said the Channel 17 budget looks good. There is also now language to clarify who owns the rights to recordings. If something has been on film, it can be used politically. c. Ms. Nowak noted an upcoming Airport Commission meeting. 7. Consider and possible approve a resolution for the application for bonded debt with the Municipal bond Bank for up to $5,000,000 for the (TIF) financing authorized by voters in November of 2016 for the reconstruction of Market Street, City Center Park (Dumont Parcel), and related costs: Ms. Blanchard said the resolution would authorize application to the Bond Bank for a 20-year bond. The estimated rate is 3.5%. The exact rate will be known at time of application. Ms. Emery moved to approve the resolution for application for bonded debt with the Municipal Bond Bank for up to $5,000,000 for the financing authorized by voters in November, 2016, for reconstruction of Market Street, City Center Park, and related costs. Ms. Nowak seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Update & Preview of New City Web Site: Ms. Nowak thanked Ms. Holm for all the design work at City Hall. Ms. Holm stressed that the Web Site is still a work in progress. She explained the elements of the site including a page for every department, information for residents, economic development information, and the most common things people want to know (e.g., regulations, dog and cat licenses, etc.). Ms. Holm then showed the “WELCOME” page and various other slides. There will be “quick links” to such things as on‐line payment, agendas/minutes, latest news, meetings/calendars, etc. There will also be a City News section to include such things as road construction sites. Ms. Nowak suggested a link to the State website for tax information, etc. Ms. Hold agreed. Ms. Riehle suggested a link to “outside” news that has links to South Burlington. Ms. Holm said she would look into that. Ms. Emery raised the issue of long URLs. Ms. Holm said she has asked for those to be shortened, but it depends on how that information is stored. Ms. Holm then showed a “hot topics” area which could contain information on what’s happening in City Center, new land development, etc. She also showed a City Council page and asked members to provide bios for that page. Mr. Chittenden suggested a central access point that can be routed to where a person needs to be. Ms. Holm said they are working on that now. Ms. Holm noted that the domain will change, and they will have a “.gov” ID. Members suggested a feedback option. 9. Insurance request and pre-payment for the Chill-Out Center: Mr. Wilson reviewed the history and work done to address the needs of youth in the community. They have been a part of the South Burlington Community since 2001, hosting dances and social events, and participating in National Night Out. He cited the opiate crisis and stressed that their goal is to help youth make better choices and meet their goals. The group has won over 50 awards for their work. Mr. Wilson noted their original request was for $6800. Ms. Riehle noted they were awarded $1300 which will be in the FY 2018 budget. Mr. Wilson said they are asking to receive that budgeted amount up front along with an additional $700 to cover insurance costs which will enable them to open the Chill-Out Center at UMall. Mr. Chittenden stressed that the School Board needs to be a part of this conversation. Ms. Nowak also cited the potential for private donors. She stressed that South Burlington can’t always be the only source of funding as there are many other obligations the city has to consider. She agreed to provide Mr. Wilson with a list of potential private donors. Mr. Chittenden expressed similar concerns with “off‐budget” requests. Mr. Barritt asked if there is $700 available in the FY17 budget. Mr. Dorn said they would look through the accounts for “underspent” funds and redirect it if the Council approves that action. Mr. Barritt then moved to find $700 in the current budget for the Chill Out Center. Ms. Emery seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Barritt then moved to pre-pay $1300 from the FY18 budget to the Chill Out Center at this time. Ms. Emery seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Wilson said they have a plan to be self-sustaining. Ms. Riehle asked for a list of their Board of Directors. 10. CSWD Budget Report: Mr. Stabler introduced Sarah Reeves, the new CSWD General Manager. Ms. Reeves said the financial outlook is strong. She was pleased to report that there will be no increase to the Solid Waste Management fee and no member assessment. Operating revenue is $11,282,932, and expenditures are $10,515,152. The budget represents a 9% increase over last year (health care a major factor in this increase). The budget includes new staffing. CSWD is currently looking at drop-off needs/center. There will be increased fees at Green Mountain Composting. The fee for food scraps will be $1.50 a bucket. Mr. Barritt felt that doing away with the bottle bill is important. Ms. Nowak cited the importance of making the public aware that mandatory composting is effective on 1 July. She also questioned how long CSWD can finance budgets by taking money from reserve funds. Ms. Reeves said they are drawing only from one of two reserve funds. Mr. Stabler added this is not the Capital Reserve Fund. Mr. Chittenden was concerned with the cost of composting requirements to city residents. He has heard this could cost up to $30 a month. Ms. Reeves said the only mandate is to keep food out of the landfill. People can do their own composting, drop it off themselves, or utilize a hauler. She wasn’t surprised at the $30 fee from haulers and felt it could be even more. Mr. Chittenden asked the impact on costs if the city had a consolidated trash service. Ms. Reeves said this is usually done by competitive bid, and a municipality can award to one or more haulers. She added that when this was done in Rhode Island, the cost was always less to consumers. CSWD has a guide for communities and would be happy to assist in that process. Mr. Chittenden asked if multiple communities could do this together. Ms. Reeves said that makes sense. The Council thanked Mr. Stabler for representing the city at CSWD for 25 years. 11. Review and possibly approve Memorandum of Understanding between the City of South Burlington and City of Burlington related to the Federal Aviation Administration/City of Burlington regarding the Home Buy-out and Demolition Program: Mr. Dorn said the MOU now includes the amendment asked for by the Council at the last meeting. Mr. Leas asked the Council to delay action as he was concerned with some of the provisions, specifically #6 and #4. Mr. Dorn said he reads those provisions the opposite way from Mr. Leas and added that the MOU was written by the City Attorney. Ms. Emery said she wants to be clear this doesn’t stop people from taking steps to protect their assets. Mr. Dorn said he would have the City Attorney look at this again. Ms. Nowak asked that the City Attorney be asked if Section 5 covers the city. 12. Acknowledge receipt from the Planning Commission of draft amendments to the Land Development Regulations and Official Map and Accompanying Reports to each: and 13. Consider warning public hearing on draft amendments to the Land Development Regulations: (a) End‐of‐trip bicycle & pedestrian facilities; (b) Planned Rights of Way – Williston Road and Market Street; (c) Affordable housing in SEQ NRN and reference corrections; (d) Street connection & cul-de-sac standard clarifications; (e) Clarification of uses permitted in the Municipal, Parks & Recreation R7 Neighborhood Commercial, and Institutional-Agricultural districts; (f) Allowance for front porches in the R4 District; (g) Administration & Enforcement –streamline Planning Commission, Development Review Board, and Advisory Committee authorization, powers & duties and membership to refer to State Law; (h) Agricultural Use Amendments not related to Agricultural Enterprise; (i) Street connections in T3-Barrett Street to San Remo Drive; (j) Technical corrections: and 14. Consider warning public hearing on draft amendments to the Official City Map; (a) Addition of a planned right-of-way along Market Street; (b) addition of a planned street extending north from Barrett Street; (c) Change from planned street to planned recreation path between San Remo Drive and Barrett Street: Ms. Riehle said that at this meeting the Council will only be receiving the amendments and setting a public hearing date. Mr. Conner said the amendments fall into 3 “buckets”: tidying up, small policy pieces (e.g., allowance for front porches), and end-of-trip bike/ped facilities. The amendment to the Official Map involves a connection at Barrett Street which will become a rec path connection instead of a full road. Ms. Riehle asked for an explanation of the “butchering” amendment. Ms. Louisos said a food hub could be located on any type of property. Food would not be processed at a food hub. However, if a food hub is located on someone’s farm, there could still be food processing but not in the food hub area. Mr. Conner noted a few small changes made by the City Attorney. Ms. Emery moved to set a public hearing for 19 June, 7 p.m. for amendments to the Land Development Regulations and Official Map with the minor changes noted this evening. Mr. Barritt seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 15. Continued discussion/approval of City Council priorities for coming year: Ms. Nowak asked to have additional time to review the information provided. Ms. Riehle suggested approving the plan on 19 June. 16. Update on status of South Burlington Dog Park(s): Mr. Dorn noted the lease with the Airport has expired and a new agreement could not be reached, so the city will have to leave the area by 1 July. There have also been complaints from dog owners about the noise at that location. The city is now proposing 2 new smaller dog parks, one at J C Park and one at Farrell Park. There are ideas for other sites as well. Slides were shown of the 2 new sites. The old fence will be taken down and there should be enough fencing for the 2 new sites. Ms. Nowak suggested a requirement that dogs using the park be registered. 17. April Financials: Mr. Dorn noted they are 83% through the fiscal year. He also noted that building permits and inspection fees are not meeting the projections. Ms. Nowak asked if other communities could use South Burlington’s inspection people. Mr. Dorn said there would have to be an MOU with the state and a backup MOU with someone. Ms. Riehle thought that was a great idea. Mr. Dorn said the projection is that the city will end up in the black. 18. Liquor Control Board: a. Pizza Putt – first class license b. 802 Cocktails – first class license Ms. Nowak moved that the Council convene as Liquor Control Board. Mr. Barritt seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Barritt moved to approve the two first class license applications as presented. Ms. Nowak seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Ms. Nowak moved that the Board reconvene as City Council. Ms. Emery seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 19. Other Business: Ms. Nowak reminded members of the proposed lunch for Public Works personnel. Ms. Riehle offered to help with the effort. There were no other issues raised. As there was no further business to come before the Council, Ms. Emery moved to adjourn. Mr. Chittenden seconded. Motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 p.m. Published by ClerkBase ©2019 by Clerkbase. No Claim to Original Government Works. South Burlington Water Dept. Accounts Payable Check Register Date: 05/16/17 Date Check No. Paid To Memo Amount Paid 5/16/2017 3186 South Burlington Ace 1.49 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 5/4/2017 VI-14254 799663/3 1.49 1.49 5/16/2017 3187 Champlain Water District 54,549.73 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 4/30/2017 VI-14252 SBWD-325 54,549.73 54,549.73 5/16/2017 3188 Champlain Water District 98,324.58 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 4/30/2017 VI-14247 SBWD-318 62.63 62.63 4/30/2017 VI-14248 APRIL 98,213.87 98,213.87 4/30/2017 VI-14251 10-125(EE) 48.08 48.08 5/16/2017 3189 E.J. Prescott, Inc. 897.87 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 4/27/2017 VI-14253 5223358 761.82 761.82 5/3/2017 VI-14255 5226551 72.36 72.36 5/1/2017 VI-14256 5224691 63.69 63.69 5/16/2017 3190 City Of South Burlington 274,862.69 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 4/30/2017 VI-14250 APRIL SEWER 274,862.69 274,862.69 5/16/2017 3191 City Of South Burlington 192,164.04 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 4/30/2017 VI-14249 APRIL STORMWATER 192,164.04 192,164.04 5/16/2017 3192 Ti-Sales Inc. 1,136.00 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 5/5/2017 VI-14257 INV0077732 1,136.00 1,136.00 Printed: May 11, 2017 Page 1 of 2 South Burlington Water Dept. Accounts Payable Check Register Date: 05/16/17 Date Check No. Paid To Memo Amount Paid Total Amount Paid: 621,936.40 SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ Printed: May 11, 2017 Page 2 of 2 Memo To: South Burlington City Council From: Tom DiPietro, Deputy Director of Public Works CC: Justin Rabidoux, Director of Public Works Date: May 9, 2017 Re: Award of Construction Contract for Oak Creek Village Culvert Replacement Project On May 4, 2017 the City of South Burlington held a bid opening for the Oak Creek Village Culvert Replacement Project. This project includes replacement of undersized culverts in two locations on Moss Glen Lane. These culverts allow tributary 7 of Potash Brook to flow through the Oak Creek Village neighborhood and their replacement will significantly increase flow capacity at these crossings, provide benefit to the stream, and reduce the likelihood of flooding in the neighborhood. The City received proposals from 4 contractors to complete this work (Table 1). The low bid for this project was submitted by Dale E. Percy, Inc. for an amount of $508,202.20. This cost is below the amount approved in the Stormwater Utility’s budget for this project. The project engineer and I have reviewed the bid package and determined that all required materials and bonds were included, all contract addenda were received by the contractor, and all necessary documents had been signed. This project is being paid for using grant funds administered by VTrans. The contractor pre-qualification for VTrans expired on May 1, 2017, but the paperwork in in the process of being renewed. VTrans staff has indicated that they will recommend award contingent on the apparent low bidder receiving prequalification status from VTrans. Table 1. Summary of Bids Received for the Oak Creek Village Culvert Replacement Project Contractor Total Bid Price Dale E. Percy, Inc. $ 508,202.20 Munson Earth Moving Corporation $ 562,968.00 Engineers Construction, Inc. $ 632,388.50 Desrochers Construction Services, Inc. $ 615,509.00 Included with this memo is the project engineer’s bid analysis and recommendation to award. Based on this information, I am requesting that City Council authorize the South Burlington Department of Public Works to award the Oak Creek Village Culvert Replacement Project to Dale E. Percy, Inc. If you would like additional information on this project or the bid results, please contact Tom DiPietro, Deputy Director of Public Works, at (802) 658-7961 x6108. Stantec Consulting Services Inc. 55 Green Mountain Drive, South Burlington VT 05403-7824 May 9, 2017 File: 195311039 Attention: Tom Dipietro, Assistant Director of Public Works South Burlington Public Works 104 Landfill Ln South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Tom, Reference: Oak Creek Village Culverts TAP TA16(8) Bids for the above referenced project were opened and publicly read aloud on Thursday, May 4h, at 2:00 PM. In accordance with VTrans protocol, Stantec has analyzed these bids and we are pleased to present the following findings and recommendations. 1. Four contractors submitted base bids ranging from $508,202 to $632,389. The bids submitted compared favorably with the engineer’s estimate of $656,655. The apparent low-bidder is Dale E. Percy Inc. Please refer to the attached bid tabulation spreadsheet for a detailed listing of the item unit prices, extended prices, and total bid price submitted by the apparent low-bidder. 2. The bid package was reviewed to determine if all the required forms were submitted. It was found that the apparent low bid included the following required documents: Bid Proposal Form; Bid Bond; Debarment and Non-Collusion Affidavit, VTrans pre-qualifications and Contractor’s EEO Certification. 3. The required forms were examined to determine if they were properly completed. Dale E. Percy Inc. submitted proof of VTrans pre-qualifications for the categories listed in the project manual but that expired May 1st, 2017. The email stated that they have submitted a renewal to VTrans. Stantec contacted Jon Winter at VTrans who verified that they have received the hard copy of the renewal material on May 8th, 2017. The project manual states the bidder must submit a complete prequalification application to the Agency of Transportation, Contract Administration, a minimum of 10 working days prior to the bid opening. The Vtrans project manager, Rachel Beauregard stated that VTrans will recommend award contingent on the apparent low bidder receiving prequalification status from VTrans. The apparent low bidder included the required signatures and acknowledged receipt of all addenda. 4. Dale E. Percy is the lowest qualified bidder. Their bid was analyzed to identify “unbalanced items". As noted in the VTrans LTF guidebook, "Bids can be unbalanced in two different ways: materially and mathematically. Mathematically unbalanced bids are individual price quotations that do not reasonably reflect actual costs. Materially unbalanced bids are ones that generate doubt that the award would result in the lowest ultimate cost.” To check for unbalanced bids, it is standard practice to review items where the engineer’s May 9, 2017 Tom Dipietro, Assistant Director of Public Works Page 2 of 2 Reference: Oak Creek Village Culverts TAP TA16(8) bid price and contractors bid price differ by ±1% of the total bid amount ($5,100 for this project). Please refer to the attached spreadsheet for Stantec's detailed analysis of "unbalanced items". In summary, the bid from Dale E. Percy is not mathematically or materially unbalanced and offers no advantage to the contractor or disadvantage to the City of South Burlington. 5. Paving, sidewalk, curb, subbase and granular backfill had unit prices significantly higher than the engineers estimate. It is likely that the apparent low bidder anticipates needing additional quantity for these items based on the means and methods they developed. However, the project plans clearly defines the pay limits for these items so there is little chance of an overrun with diligent oversight from the resident engineer. Based on our analysis of the bid submitted, we recommend that the City of South Burlington award the contract to Dale E. Percy, Inc. for the base bid amount of $508,202. Please contact us if you have questions regarding our analysis and recommendation. We will be happy to meet with you at your convenience to discuss this further. Regards, STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. Chrisotpher Gendron, PE Transportation Engineer Phone: (802) 864-0223 chris.gendron@stantec.com Attachment: Bid Tabulation Spreadsheet Analysis of Unbalanced Items c. Rachel Beauregard , VTrans VTrans Concurrence of Recommendation Rachel Beauregard, VTrans Local Transportation Facilities Date ea v:\1953\active\195310851\transportation\construction\bid phase\bid analysis\award recommendation.docx City of South BurlingtonPrepared by: DMYSouth Burlington TAP TA16(8) / Oak Creek Village CulvertsChecked by: CGDate: May 9th, 2017Bid Opening Date: May 4, 2017Stantec Project No. 195311039Average Unit PriceBid Item Description Of Item Unit QuantityUnit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price201.10 Clearing and Grubbing, Including Individual Trees and StuLS 1 $5,000.0000 $5,000.00 $413.00 $413.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $5,853.25203.15 Common Excavation CY 70 $26.0800 $1,825.60 $15.25 $1,067.50 $16.00 $1,120.00 $22.00 $1,540.00 $20.00 $1,400.00 $18.31203.16 Solid Rock Excavation CY 138 $115.8700 $15,990.06 $80.25 $11,074.50 $55.00 $7,590.00 $180.00 $24,840.00 $153.00 $21,114.00 $117.06204.20Trench Excavation of EarthCY 150 $20.1003 $3,015.04 $10.00 $1,500.00 $52.00 $7,800.00 $10.00 $1,500.00 $20.00 $3,000.00 $23.00204.21Trench Excavation of RockCY 8 $143.8046 $1,150.44 $61.50 $492.00 $250.00 $2,000.00 $180.00 $1,440.00 $210.00 $1,680.00 $175.38204.22Trench Excavation of Earth, Exploratory (N.A.B.I.)CY 2 $75.0000 $150.00 $168.00 $336.00 $75.00 $150.00 $75.00 $150.00 $75.00 $150.00 $98.25204.25Structure ExcavationCY 1,150 $26.5685 $30,553.72 $19.25 $22,137.50 $16.00 $18,400.00 $18.00 $20,700.00 $21.00 $24,150.00 $18.56204.30Granular Backfill for StructuresCY 250 $40.6906 $10,172.66 $59.50 $14,875.00 $65.00 $16,250.00 $52.00 $13,000.00 $87.00 $21,750.00 $65.88210.10Cold Planing, Bituminous PavementSY 75 $37.6900 $2,826.75 $30.50 $2,287.50 $22.00 $1,650.00 $25.00 $1,875.00 $22.50 $1,687.50 $25.00301.26Subbase of Gravel, Fine GradedCY 70 $44.6675 $3,126.72 $38.00 $2,660.00 $42.00 $2,940.00 $74.00 $5,180.00 $44.00 $3,080.00 $49.50301.35Subbase of Dense Graded Crushed StoneCY 28 $58.6915 $1,643.36 $96.00 $2,688.00 $42.00 $1,176.00 $83.00 $2,324.00 $46.00 $1,288.00 $66.75404.65Emulsified AsphaltCWT 2 $105.3666 $210.73 $111.00 $222.00 $50.00 $100.00 $110.00 $220.00 $100.00 $200.00 $92.75406.50Price Adjustment, Asphalt Cement (N.A.B.I.)LU 1 $1.0000 $1.00 $1.15 $1.15 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.04514.10Water Repellent, SilaneGAL 5 $80.1953 $400.98 $68.00 $340.00 $50.00 $250.00 $90.00 $450.00 $57.00 $285.00 $66.25540.10Precast Concrete Structure (16'-0" x 3'-6" x 99'-8" Box)LS 1 $182,000.0000 $182,000.00 $172,100.00 $172,100.00 $180,000.00 $180,000.00 $180,000.00 $180,000.00 $193,400.00 $193,400.00 $181,375.00540.10Precast Concrete Structure (16'-0" x 4'-6" x 78'-11" Box)LS 1 $163,000.0000 $163,000.00 $148,200.00 $148,200.00 $155,000.00 $155,000.00 $155,000.00 $155,000.00 $167,700.00 $167,700.00 $156,475.00601.260512" CPEP(SL)LF 37 $70.0000 $2,590.00 $34.50 $1,276.50 $80.00 $2,960.00 $47.00 $1,739.00 $40.00 $1,480.00 $50.38601.261015" CPEP(SL)LF 65 $56.1400 $3,649.10 $32.00 $2,080.00 $82.00 $5,330.00 $46.00 $2,990.00 $44.00 $2,860.00 $51.00601.262024" CPEP(SL)LF 30 $71.3198 $2,139.59 $55.25 $1,657.50 $85.00 $2,550.00 $67.00 $2,010.00 $57.00 $1,710.00 $66.06604.20Precast Reinforced Concrete Catch Basin with Cast Iron GrateEA 3 $3,400.0000 $10,200.00 $2,340.00 $7,020.00 $3,500.00 $10,500.00 $3,300.00 $9,900.00 $3,700.00 $11,100.00 $3,210.00605.106 Inch Underdrain PipeLF 15 $17.6938 $265.41 $16.75 $251.25 $52.00 $780.00 $28.00 $420.00 $25.00 $375.00 $30.44605.206 Inch Underdrain Carrier PipeLF 80 $23.4487 $1,875.89 $9.00 $720.00 $28.00 $2,240.00 $20.00 $1,600.00 $18.00 $1,440.00 $18.75605.95 Underdrain Flushing Basin EA 1 $283.1248 $283.12 $250.00 $250.00 $200.00 $200.00 $240.00 $240.00 $250.00 $250.00 $235.00613.10Stone Fill, Type ICY 2 $62.6900 $125.38 $130.00 $260.00 $150.00 $300.00 $185.00 $370.00 $84.00 $168.00 $137.25616.28Cast-in-Place Concrete Curb, Type BLF 170 $42.3800 $7,204.60 $26.00 $4,420.00 $25.00 $4,250.00 $24.50 $4,165.00 $42.00 $7,140.00 $29.38616.41Removal of Existing CurbLF 200 $9.6600 $1,932.00 $4.00 $800.00 $8.00 $1,600.00 $3.00 $600.00 $7.00 $1,400.00 $5.50618.10Portland Cement Concrete Sidewalk, 5 inchSY 68 $96.4300 $6,557.24 $139.00 $9,452.00 $52.00 $3,536.00 $65.00 $4,420.00 $63.00 $4,284.00 $79.75622.10Insulation BoardMFBM 0.8 $897.7535 $718.20 $845.00 $676.00 $1,200.00 $960.00 $800.00 $640.00 $1,100.00 $880.00 $986.25628.42Transfer to New System, Sanitary SewerLS 2 $2,000.0000 $4,000.00 $1,060.00 $2,120.00 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $5,400.00 $10,800.00 $2,740.00629.27Gate Valve with Box (8")EA 4 $2,410.2879 $9,641.15 $1,213.00 $4,852.00 $1,100.00 $4,400.00 $1,400.00 $5,600.00 $4,720.00 $18,880.00 $2,108.25629.42Transfer to New System, Water SystemLS 2 $2,000.0000 $4,000.00 $255.00 $510.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 $4,000.00 $8,000.00 $6,000.00 $12,000.00 $3,438.75630.15FlaggersHR 200 $36.0438 $7,208.76 $30.00 $6,000.00 $26.00 $5,200.00 $32.00 $6,400.00 $40.00 $8,000.00 $32.00635.11Mobilization / DemobilizationLS 1 $59,695.2380 $59,695.24 $10,070.00 $10,070.00 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 $25,200.00 $25,200.00 $20,817.50641.10Traffic ControlLS 1 $4,000.0000 $4,000.00 $13,300.00 $13,300.00 $9,500.00 $9,500.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $9,575.00649.310Geotextile Under Stone FillSY 6 $9.2195 $55.32 $5.15 $30.90 $2.00 $12.00 $5.00 $30.00 $2.00 $12.00 $3.54651.15SeedLB 7 $15.6461 $109.52 $11.00 $77.00 $10.00 $70.00 $7.00 $49.00 $6.00 $42.00 $8.50651.18FertilizerLB 50 $4.7663 $238.31 $1.20 $60.00 $10.00 $500.00 $4.00 $200.00 $3.00 $150.00 $4.55651.20Agricultural LimestoneTON 0.5 $783.8847 $391.94 $912.00 $456.00 $750.00 $375.00 $700.00 $350.00 $795.00 $397.50 $789.25651.25Hay MulchTON 0.5 $678.2830 $339.14 $1,060.00 $530.00 $750.00 $375.00 $900.00 $450.00 $775.00 $387.50 $871.25651.35TopsoilCY 30 $54.1798 $1,625.40 $72.00 $2,160.00 $50.00 $1,500.00 $67.00 $2,010.00 $45.00 $1,350.00 $58.50653.20Temporary Erosion MattingCY 120 $4.6126 $553.51 $2.00 $240.00 $2.00 $240.00 $4.00 $480.00 $2.00 $240.00 $2.50653.46Filter BagEA 2 $332.8200 $665.64 $307.00 $614.00 $400.00 $800.00 $220.00 $440.00 $130.00 $260.00 $264.25653.50Barrier FenceLF 525 $4.6345 $2,433.09 $2.75 $1,443.75 $2.00 $1,050.00 $2.00 $1,050.00 $3.00 $1,575.00 $2.44656.30Deciidous Trees (Linden Maple)(B&B((2-2.5" Cal.)EA 4 $321.6201 $1,286.48 $500.00 $2,000.00 $525.00 $2,100.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 $700.00 $2,800.00 $556.25656.80Landscape Backfill, Truck MeasurementCY 16 $67.6744 $1,082.79 $79.00 $1,264.00 $75.00 $1,200.00 $72.00 $1,152.00 $30.00 $480.00 $64.00900.608Special Provision (Stone Fill, Stream Bed Material)CY 76 $70.0000 $5,320.00 $42.00 $3,192.00 $52.00 $3,952.00 $50.00 $3,800.00 $60.00 $4,560.00 $51.00900.640Special Provision (Direct Burial Duct Bank, 1-4 Ducts)LF 210 $50.0000 $10,500.00 $25.00 $5,250.00 $32.00 $6,720.00 $100.00 $21,000.00 $40.00 $8,400.00 $49.25900.640Special Provision (Ductile Iron Pipe, Cement Lined, All-Inclusive)(8" Sewer)LF 83 $150.0000 $12,450.00 $55.00 $4,565.00 $155.00 $12,865.00 $106.00 $8,798.00 $60.00 $4,980.00 $94.00Engineers Construction, Inc.Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Dale E. Percy, Inc. Munson Earth Moving Corporation Desrochers Construction Services, Inc.V:\1953\active\195311039\Construction\Bid Phase\Bid Opening\Bid Results Tabulation.xlsxPage 1 of 7 Average Unit PriceEngineers Construction, Inc.Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Dale E. Percy, Inc. Munson Earth Moving Corporation Desrochers Construction Services, Inc.900.640Special Provision (Ductile Iron Pipe, Cement Lined, All-Inclusive)(8" Water)LF 100 $180.0000 $18,000.00 $95.00 $9,500.00 $195.00 $19,500.00 $122.00 $12,200.00 $50.00 $5,000.00 $115.50900.640Special Provision (Modified Cast-in-Place Concrete Curb, Type B)LF 35 $100.0000 $3,500.00 $26.00 $910.00 $30.00 $1,050.00 $31.00 $1,085.00 $60.00 $2,100.00 $36.75900.645Special Provision (Temporary Relocation of Stream)(Culvert #1)LS 1 $20,000.0000 $20,000.00 $7,600.00 $7,600.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $17,000.00 $17,000.00 $11,350.00 $11,350.00 $10,487.50900.645Special Provision (Temporary Relocation of Stream)(Culvert #2)LS 1 $20,000.0000 $20,000.00 $6,285.00 $6,285.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $17,000.00 $17,000.00 $11,300.00 $11,300.00 $10,146.25900.650Special Provision (Mixture Pay Adjustment)(N.A.B.I.)LU 1 $1.0000 $1.00 $1.15 $1.15 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.04900.680Special Provision (Bituminous Concrete Pavement, Small Quantity)Ton 73 $150.0000 $10,950.00 $218.00 $15,914.00 $225.00 $16,425.00 $200.00 $14,600.00 $187.00 $13,651.00 $207.50TOTAL = $656,654.89TOTAL = $508,202.20TOTAL = $562,968.00TOTAL = $615,509.00TOTAL = $632,388.50Notes:V:\1953\active\195311039\Construction\Bid Phase\Bid Opening\Bid Results Tabulation.xlsxPage 2 of 7 City of South BurlingtonPrepared by: DMYSouth Burlington TAP TA16(8) / Oak Creek Village CulvertsChecked by: CGDate: May 9th, 2017Bid Opening Date: May 4, 2017Stantec Project No. 195311039Difference b/t Unit Prices Compared to Total Engineer's Estimate (percent)Bid Item Description Of Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price201.10Clearing and Grubbing, Including Individual Trees and Stumps LS 1 $5,000.0000$5,000.00$413.00$413.00-0.90%203.15 Common Excavation CY 70 $26.0800$1,825.60$15.25 $1,067.50-0.15%203.16 Solid Rock Excavation CY 138 $115.8700$15,990.06$80.25 $11,074.50-0.97%204.20Trench Excavation of EarthCY 150 $20.1003 $3,015.04$10.00$1,500.00-0.30%204.21Trench Excavation of RockCY 8 $143.8046$1,150.44$61.50$492.00-0.13%204.22Trench Excavation of Earth, Exploratory (N.A.B.I.)CY 2 $75.0000$150.00$168.00$336.000.04%204.25Structure ExcavationCY 1,150 $26.5685 $30,553.72$19.25 $22,137.50-1.66%204.30Granular Backfill for StructuresCY 250 $40.6906$10,172.66$59.50$14,875.000.93%210.10Cold Planing, Bituminous PavementSY 75 $37.6900$2,826.75 $30.50$2,287.50-0.11%301.26Subbase of Gravel, Fine GradedCY 70 $44.6675 $3,126.72 $38.00$2,660.00-0.09%301.35Subbase of Dense Graded Crushed StoneCY 28 $58.6915 $1,643.36$96.00$2,688.000.21%404.65Emulsified AsphaltCWT2 $105.3666$210.73 $111.00$222.000.00%406.50Price Adjustment, Asphalt Cement (N.A.B.I.)LU 1 $1.0000$1.00 $1.15 $1.15 0.00%514.10Water Repellent, SilaneGAL 5 $80.1953 $400.98$68.00$340.00-0.01%540.10Precast Concrete Structure (16'-0" x 3'-6" x 99'-8" Box)LS 1 $182,000.0000$182,000.00$172,100.00$172,100.00-1.95%540.10Precast Concrete Structure (16'-0" x 4'-6" x 78'-11" Box)LS 1 $163,000.0000$163,000.00$148,200.00$148,200.00-2.91%601.260512" CPEP(SL)LF 37 $70.0000$2,590.00$34.50$1,276.50-0.26%601.261015" CPEP(SL)LF 65 $56.1400$3,649.10$32.00$2,080.00-0.31%601.262024" CPEP(SL)LF 30 $71.3198$2,139.59 $55.25 $1,657.50-0.09%604.20Precast Reinforced Concrete Catch Basin with Cast Iron GrateEA 3 $3,400.0000$10,200.00$2,340.00$7,020.00-0.63%605.106 Inch Underdrain PipeLF 15 $17.6938$265.41 $16.75 $251.25 0.00%605.206 Inch Underdrain Carrier PipeLF 80 $23.4487$1,875.89 $9.00 $720.00-0.23%605.95 Underdrain Flushing Basin EA 1 $283.1248$283.12 $250.00$250.00-0.01%613.10Stone Fill, Type ICY 2 $62.6900$125.38$130.00$260.000.03%616.28Cast-in-Place Concrete Curb, Type BLF 170 $42.3800$7,204.60$26.00$4,420.00-0.55%616.41Removal of Existing CurbLF 200 $9.6600$1,932.00$4.00 $800.00-0.22%618.10Portland Cement Concrete Sidewalk, 5 inchSY 68 $96.4300$6,557.24$139.00$9,452.000.57%622.10Insulation BoardMFBM 0.8 $897.7535 $718.20$845.00$676.00-0.01%628.42Transfer to New System, Sanitary SewerLS 2 $2,000.0000$4,000.00$1,060.00$2,120.00-0.37%629.27Gate Valve with Box (8")EA 4 $2,410.2879$9,641.15 $1,213.00$4,852.00-0.94%629.42Transfer to New System, Water SystemLS 2 $2,000.0000$4,000.00$255.00$510.00-0.69%630.15FlaggersHR 200 $36.0438$7,208.76$30.00$6,000.00-0.24%635.11Mobilization / DemobilizationLS 1 $59,695.2380$59,695.24$10,070.00$10,070.00-9.76%641.10Traffic ControlLS 1 $4,000.0000$4,000.00$13,300.00$13,300.001.83%649.310Geotextile Under Stone FillSY 6 $9.2195 $55.32 $5.15 $30.900.00%651.15SeedLB 7 $15.6461 $109.52 $11.00$77.00-0.01%651.18FertilizerLB 50 $4.7663 $238.31 $1.20 $60.00-0.04%651.20Agricultural LimestoneTON 0.5 $783.8847$391.94$912.00$456.000.01%651.25Hay MulchTON 0.5 $678.2830$339.14$1,060.00$530.000.04%651.35TopsoilCY 30 $54.1798$1,625.40$72.00$2,160.000.11%653.20Temporary Erosion MattingCY 120 $4.6126$553.51 $2.00 $240.00-0.06%Base BidDale E. Percy, Inc.Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction CostV:\1953\active\195311039\Construction\Bid Phase\Bid Opening\Bid Results Tabulation.xlsxPage 3 of 7 Difference b/t Unit Prices Compared to Total Engineer's Estimate (percent)Bid Item Description Of Item Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total PriceBase BidDale E. Percy, Inc.Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost653.46Filter BagEA 2 $332.8200$665.64$307.00$614.00-0.01%653.50Barrier FenceLF 525 $4.6345 $2,433.09 $2.75 $1,443.75 -0.19%656.30Deciidous Trees (Linden Maple)(B&B((2-2.5" Cal.)EA 4 $321.6201$1,286.48$500.00$2,000.000.14%656.80Landscape Backfill, Truck MeasurementCY 16 $67.6744$1,082.79 $79.00$1,264.000.04%900.608Special Provision (Stone Fill, Stream Bed Material)CY 76 $70.0000$5,320.00$42.00$3,192.00-0.42%900.640Special Provision (Direct Burial Duct Bank, 1-4 Ducts)LF 210 $50.0000$10,500.00$25.00$5,250.00-1.03%900.640Special Provision (Ductile Iron Pipe, Cement Lined, All-Inclusive)(8" Sewer)LF 83 $150.0000 $12,450.00 $55.00 $4,565.00 -1.55%900.640Special Provision (Ductile Iron Pipe, Cement Lined, All-Inclusive)(8" Water)LF 100 $180.0000 $18,000.00 $95.00 $9,500.00 -1.67%900.640Special Provision (Modified Cast-in-Place Concrete Curb, Type B)LF 35 $100.0000$3,500.00$26.00$910.00-0.51%900.645Special Provision (Temporary Relocation of Stream)(Culvert #1)LS 1 $20,000.0000$20,000.00$7,600.00$7,600.00-2.44%900.645Special Provision (Temporary Relocation of Stream)(Culvert #2)LS 1 $20,000.0000$20,000.00$6,285.00$6,285.00-2.70%900.650Special Provision (Mixture Pay Adjustment)(N.A.B.I.)LU 1 $1.0000$1.00 $1.15 $1.15 0.00%900.680Special Provision (Bituminous Concrete Pavement, Small Quantity)Ton 73 $150.0000$10,950.00$218.00$15,914.000.98%TOTAL = $656,654.89TOTAL = $508,202.20V:\1953\active\195311039\Construction\Bid Phase\Bid Opening\Bid Results Tabulation.xlsxPage 4 of 7 City of South BurlingtonBid Opening Date: May 4, 2017ANALYSIS OF UNBALANCED ITEMS PERFORMED BY STANTEC FOR THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTONITEM NO.ITEMDESCRIPTIONUNITBIDQUANTITYUNITPRICE EXTENSIONUNITPRICE EXTENSIONBID OVER/UNDER RUN% OVER/UNDER RUN204.22 Trench Excavation of Earth, Exploratory (N.A.B.I.) CY 2 75.00$ 150.00$ 168.00$ 336.00$ 186.00$ 124.00%204.25 Structure Excavation CY 1150 26.57$ 30,553.72$ 19.25$ 22,137.50$ (8,416.22)$ -27.55%204.30 Granular Backfill for Structures CY 250.00 40.69$ 10,172.66$ 59.50$ 14,875.00$ 4,702.34$ 46.23%301.35 Subbase of Dense Graded Crushed Stone CY 28.00 58.69$ 1,643.36$ 96.00$ 2,688.00$ 1,044.64$ 63.57%540.10 Precast Concrete Structure (16'-0" x 3'-6" x 99'-8" Box)LS 1.00 182,000.00$ 182,000.00$ 172,100.00$ 172,100.00$ (9,900.00)$ -5.44%540.10 Precast Concrete Structure (16'-0" x 4'-6" x 78'-11" Box)LS 1.00 163,000.00$ 163,000.00$ 148,200.00$ 148,200.00$ (14,800.00)$ -9.08%618.10 Portland Cement Concrete Sidewalk, 5 inch SY 68.00 96.43$ 6,557.24$ 139.00$ 9,452.00$ 2,894.76$ 44.15%A local concrete manufacturer was contacted to estimate material costs for the precast concrete structures, and the unit bid price is considered in line with this estimate. Being a lump sum item, there is no risk in this item over running.The quantity has been verified and the bid price is considered acceptable.This item has very specific pay limits shown on the plans and the Resident Engineer should track this item closley to prevent any overuns. While the bid unit price is higher than the engineer's estimate unit price, this may reflect additional sidewalk required beyond the pay limits as dictated by the contractor's means and methods.The purpose of this analysis is to help determine whether or not it is in the City's best interest to award this Contract to the lowest responsive bidder. If a bid is unbalanced (materially or mathematically) then it may not be in the City's best interest to award the Contract to that bidder. To check for unbalanced bids, it is standard practice to review items where the engineer's estimate and the contractor's bid price differ by ± 1% of the total bid amount. These items (highlighted in yellow) are listed below with the engineer's opinion regarding acceptance the bid price. Additional items listed are items that have a much higher unit price then the engineers estimate that have the potential to increase the overall cost of the project should the quantity of the item increase.Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Dale E. Percy, Inc.The engineer's estimated price is based on VTrans' bid regression and bid history. The other contractors' unit prices for this item has a range of $16 - $21. Percy's unit price bid of $19.25 is 27.5% lower than the unit price estimated, but is in line with the other three bidders. The quantity has been verified. The bid price is considered acceptable. A local concrete manufacturer was contacted to estimate material costs for the precast concrete structures, and the unit bid price is considered in line with this estimate. Being a lump sum item, there is no risk in this item over running. The quantity has been verified and the bid price is considered acceptable.This item has very specific pay limits shown on the plans and the Resident Engineer should track this item closley to prevent any overuns. While the bid unit price is higher than the engineer's estimate unit price, this may reflect additional backfill required beyond the pay limits as dictated by the contractor's means and methods.This item has very specific pay limits shown on the plans and the Resident Engineer should track this item closley to prevent any overuns. While the bid unit price is higher than the engineer's estimate unit price, this may reflectadditional subbase required beyond the pay limits as dictated by the contractor's means and methods.This item is Not A Bid Item (N.A.B.I) and the apparent low bidder bid on it because the bid form did not have the default values for N.A.B.I. item filled in. The item is a very small portion of the contract so there is no risk of this item signaficantly overrunning. The same applies for the other items under the N.A.B.I. category (405.50 Price Adjustment, Asphalt Cement (N.A.B.I.) and 900.650 Special Provision (Mixture Pay Adjustment)(N.A.B.I.))V:\1953\active\195311039\Construction\Bid Phase\Bid Opening\Bid Results Tabulation.xlsxPage 5 of 7 ITEM NO.ITEMDESCRIPTIONUNITBIDQUANTITYUNITPRICE EXTENSIONUNITPRICE EXTENSIONBID OVER/UNDER RUN% OVER/UNDER RUNEngineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Dale E. Percy, Inc.635.11 Mobilization / DemobilizationLS 159,695.24$ 59,695.24$ 10,070.00$ 10,070.00$ (49,625.24)$ -83.13%641.10 Traffic ControlLS 14,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 13,300.00$ 13,300.00$ 9,300.00$ 232.50%900.640 Special Provision (Direct Burial Duct Bank, 1-4 Ducts) LF 210 50.00$ 10,500.00$ 25.00$ 5,250.00$ (5,250.00)$ -50.00%900.640 Special Provision (Ductile Iron Pipe, Cement Lined, All-Inclusive)(8" Sewer) LF 83 150.00$ 12,450.00$ 55.00$ 4,565.00$ (7,885.00)$ -63.33%The engineer's estimated price was based on experience with similar projects. The engineer's estimate can be considered conservative. The other contractors' unit prices for this item were $32, $40, and $100 per LF. Percy's unit price bid of $25.00 is in line with most of the other three bidders. The bid price is considered acceptable.The engineer's estimated price was based on experience with similar projects. Special Provision items such as this are difficult to estimate as the means and methods of the contractor are unknown at the time of estimating. The engineer's estimate can be considered conservative. The other contractors' unit prices for this item were $60, $106, and $155 per LF. Percy's unit price bid of $55.00 is significantly lower than the Engineer's estimated unit price and lower than all of the other bidders for this item. As means and methods are unknown and the item has low risk of over running, the bid price is considered acceptable.The engineer's estimated price is based on the standard estimation of 8% of the total project cost. The contractor's unit price is much lower than the engineer's assumption. As this item is very well defined within the specifications, and The engineer's estimated price was based on experience with similar projects. The engineer's estimate can be considered conservative. As this item is very well defined within the specifications, and is a lump sum item, there is no risk forthis item to overrun. The bid price is considered acceptable.V:\1953\active\195311039\Construction\Bid Phase\Bid Opening\Bid Results Tabulation.xlsxPage 6 of 7 ITEM NO.ITEMDESCRIPTIONUNITBIDQUANTITYUNITPRICE EXTENSIONUNITPRICE EXTENSIONBID OVER/UNDER RUN% OVER/UNDER RUNEngineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Dale E. Percy, Inc.900.640 Special Provision (Ductile Iron Pipe, Cement Lined, All-Inclusive)(8" Water) LF 100 180.00$ 18,000.00$ 95.00$ 9,500.00$ (8,500.00)$ -47.22%900.645 Special Provision (Temporary Relocation of Stream)(Culvert #1)LS 120,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 7,600.00$ 7,600.00$ (12,400.00)$ -62.00%900.645 Special Provision (Temporary Relocation of Stream)(Culvert #2)LS 120,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 6,285.00$ 6,285.00$ (13,715.00)$ -68.58%900.680 Special Provision (Bituminous Concrete Pavement, Small Quantity) LF 73.00 150.00$ 10,950.00$ 218.00$ 15,914.00$ 4,964.00$ 45.33%BID PRICE = $508,202.201% OF BID PRICE = $5,100.00The engineer's estimated price was based on experience with similar projects. The engineer's estimate can be considered conservative. As this item is very well defined within the specifications, and is a lump sum item, there is no risk forthis item to overrun. The bid price is considered acceptable.The engineer's estimated price was based on experience with similar projects. The engineer's estimate can be considered conservative. As this item is very well defined within the specifications, and is a lump sum item, there is no risk for this item to overrun. The bid price is considered acceptable.The engineer's estimated price was based on experience with similar projects. Special Provision items such as this are difficult to estimate as the means and methods of the contractor are unknown at the time of estimating. The engineer's estimate can be considered conservative. The other contractors' unit prices for this item were $50, $122, and $195 per LF. Percy's unit price bid of $95.00 is lower than the Engineer's estimated unit price and within the range This item has very specific pay limits shown on the plans and the Resident Engineer should track this item closley to prevent any overuns. While the bid unit price is higher than the engineer's estimate unit price, this may reflectV:\1953\active\195311039\Construction\Bid Phase\Bid Opening\Bid Results Tabulation.xlsxPage 7 of 7 Memo To: South Burlington City Council From: Tom DiPietro, Deputy Director of Public Works CC: Justin Rabidoux, Director of Public Works Date: May 12, 2017 Re: Award of Construction Contract for Bartlett Brook Central Stormwater Project On Monday, May 8, 2017, the City of South Burlington held a bid opening for the Bartlett Brook Central Stormwater Improvement Project. This project includes the construction of a gravel wetland and drainage system infrastructure, including a swirl separator, wetland plants, fencing and other related items. This gravel wetland will be installed on City owned property located at the bottom of Quail Run and Keari Lane, while the drainage infrastructure will be installed along Pheasant Way, Quail Run, Keari Lane, and Bay Court. We received bids from one contractor, submitted by Griffin & Griffin Excavating, Inc. for an amount of $765,000. This cost is below the amount approved in the Stormwater Utility’s budget for this project, which was $853,730. The project team has reviewed the bid package and determined that all required materials and bonds were included, all contract addenda were received by the contractor, and all necessary documents had been signed. While the City was disappointed that a greater number of bids were not submitted for the project, the bid received was below our estimate. Discussions with contractors who expressed interest in the project during the bid phase, but who ultimately did not submit a bid, generally indicated that the current bidding climate is very busy. Since there are many construction project out to bid this season, contractors can be selective with what projects they choose to pursue. The general sentiment we heard was that many contractors did not submit a bid for the City’s project because they felt that the project was either too small for the type of work they were looking for, or that they were too busy with other work. Based on this, I am requesting that City Council authorize the South Burlington Department of Public Works to award the Bartlett Brook Central Stormwater Improvements Project to Griffin & Griffin Excavating, Inc. If you would like additional information on this project or the bid results, please contact Tom DiPietro, Deputy Director of Public Works, at (802) 658-7961 x6108. May 11, 2017 Mr. Thomas DiPietro Deputy Director of Public Works City of South Burlington Department of Public Works 104 Landfill Road South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Bartlett Brook Central Stormwater Improvement Project Dear Mr. DiPietro, On May 8, 2017 one sealed bid for the Bartlett Brook Central Stormwater Improvement Project was opened and the bidder was Griffin & Griffin Excavating, Inc. of Moretown, Vermont, with a bid of $765,000 for the Schedule A base bid. The required documentation, bid bond, and acknowledgements have been reviewed and found to be in accordance with the contract requirements. We have analyzed the bid submitted by Griffin & Griffin Excavating for accuracy and completeness and found that there are no substantive bid informalities. Refer to the attached copy of the bid submitted by Griffin & Griffin Excavating. Griffin and Griffin Excavating’s bid of $765,000 is generally in line with our Engineer’s total construction cost estimate of $848,000, which included a construction contingency. Discussions with Contractors who expressed initial interest in the project during the bid phase, but who ultimately did not submit a bid, generally indicated that the current bidding climate is busy. Since there are many construction project out to bid this season, Contractors can be selective with what projects they choose to pursue. The general sentiment we heard was that many Contractors didn’t submit a bid for the City’s project because they felt that the project was either too small for their bid to be competitive, or that they were too busy with other work. Telephone discussions with several of Griffin & Griffin Excavating listed references gave no indication that Griffin & Griffin Excavating would be incapable of completing the project work. Our reference checks revealed that Griffin & Griffin Excavating has successfully completed work throughout Vermont in the recent past on various excavation, stormwater, and slope stability projects. Based upon the information received, Griffin & Griffin Excavating appears to be qualified to complete the Bartlett Brook Central Stormwater Improvement Project. Mr. Thomas DiPietro, Deputy Director of Public Works May 11, 2017 Page 2 In consideration of the above, it is the recommendation of Hoyle Tanner & Associates, Inc. that the City award the Bartlett Brook Central Stormwater Improvement Project to Griffin & Griffin Excavating in the total amount of $765,000. If you any questions, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, HOYLE, TANNER & ASSOCIATES, INC. Michael V. Schramm, P.E. Kirstin DiPietro Worden, P.E. Vice President Associate Resolution 2017 - RESOLUTION CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY CENTER TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT INFRASTRUCTURE AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BOND ISSUANCE WHEREAS, at a duly warned and noticed Special City Meeting on November 8, 2016, the voters of the City of South Burlington approved the issuance of bonds in an amount not to exceed Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000), as well as temporary borrowing in anticipation of the issuance of bonds, to finance the initial construction of public infrastructure and public improvements in the City Center TIF District (the “TIF Bonds”); and WHEREAS, the City funded preliminary costs of the development of public infrastructure and public improvements in the TIF District and related costs with interfund borrowing; and WHEREAS, at present, said interfund borrowing totals $460,000; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes it now to be in the best interests of the City to refinance the interfund borrowing and to finance the final design and construction of the TIF District public infrastructure and public improvements and related costs with general obligation bonds of the City. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City shall issue Five Million Dollars ($5,000,000) of general obligation bonds to finance public infrastructure and public improvements within the TIF District, it being the intention of the City that said bonds shall be repaid primarily from incremental tax revenues derived from private development projects within the TIF District; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City make an application to the Vermont Municipal Bond Bank for inclusion of the City’s $5,000,000 worth of bonds within the next pooled bond issue by said Bond Bank, and that the City Manager, City Treasurer and their respective designees and representatives are hereby authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the City all documents, certifications, and authorizations necessary and reasonably requested by the Vermont Municipal Bond Bank to facilitate such application and to have the City’s bonds included in the next pooled bond issue by said Bond Bank. APPROVED this _____ day of ______________ , 2017. PAGE 2: RESOLUTION CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY CENTER TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT INFRASTRUCTURE AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BOND ISSUANCE SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL __________________________________ ________________________________ Helen Riehle, Chair Meaghan Emery, Vice-Chair __________________________________ ________________________________ Tim Barritt, Clerk Pat Nowak __________________________________ Tom Chittenden 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4107 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com To: Kevin Dorn, City Manager From: Ilona Blanchard, Project Director Subject: Discuss and consider approving a resolution authorizing the issuance of $5,000,000 in bond debt and application to the Vermont Bond Bank to be included in the next pooled bond issue. Date: May 12, 2017 Background: The City has reached out to private lenders and the Vermont Bank. The Vermont Bond Bank offers very competitive rates (the last issuance was at under 3.5%), flexibility in terms, and does not charge issuance fees. In November of 2016, the voters approved Article 1 at a Special Meeting, authorizing the City Council to issue up to $5,000,000 in bond debt for Market Street, City Center Park Phase I (Dumont Parcel) and costs related to administration and implementation of the TIF District. Attachments: • Resolution re: City of South Burlington City Center Tax Increment Financing District infrastructure and capital improvement bond issuance Recommendation: Review and consider approving the attached resolution. Additional consideration: The application is due now for the Vermont Bond Bank’s 2017 pooled bond issuance. Interest rates are at historic lows. April 27, 2017 Janice Ladd City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Janice: Attached please find copies of the Chittenden Solid Waste District Proposed FY 2018 Budget. CSWD is scheduled to meet with the City of South Burlington on Monday, May 15, 2017 at 8:00 p.m. Please forward the attached copies to your City Council for their review. Also, please note that the front cover of our FY 18 Budget refers to a website www.cswd.net , where a complete detailed copy of our budget is available for review. The Board of Commissioners approved sending the Proposed FY 2018 Budget to Member towns for their approval on Wednesday, April 26, 2017. Below is Section 4. (b) of the Chittenden Solid Waste District Charter. Within 45 days of the approval of the budget by the Board of Commissioners, the legislative body of each member municipality shall act to approve or disapprove the budget. The budget shall be approved if approved by the legislative bodies of a majority of the member municipalities. (For such purposes, each member municipality shall be entitled to one vote.) A legislative body that disapproves the budget must file with the Board of Commissioners a written statement of objections to the budget identifying those specific items to be changed, and failure to file such statement of objections within the forty-five (45) day period shall constitute approval by such municipality. A legislative body that fails to act to approve or disapprove the budget within the forty-five (45) day period shall likewise be deemed to have approved the budget. As stated above, each member municipality may choose to approve or disapprove the budget prior to June 10, 2017. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, Amy Jewell Administrative Manager Cc: Paul Stabler, Rep. Mark Boucher, Alt. FY 2018 BUDGET PROPOSAL TO VIEW BUDGET DETAIL GO TO www.cswd.net CHITTENDEN SOLID WASTE DISTRICT 1021 REDMOND ROAD WILLISTON, VT 05495 802-872-8100 Printed on recycled paper CSWD BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS TOWN NAME Start Date ADDRESS HOME #WORK#E-MAIL Bolton - Rep.Duncan Galbraith 5/5/2014 66 Curtis Lane, Waterbury VT 05676 434-5531 dagvtr@gmavt.net Bolton - Alt.Vacant Burlington - Rep.Rob Green 7/1/2016 BPW, PO Box 849 Burlington VT 05402 316-0791 865-7200 Rgreen@burlingtonvt.gov Burlington - Alt Jennifer Green 11/28/2016 77 Mansfield Ave. Burlington, VT 05401 922-5600 865-7349 jgreenvt@gmail.com Charlotte - Rep.Abby Foulk 4/30/2013 957 Orchard Rd, Charlotte VT 05445 425-3078 999-8501 afoulk@gmavt.com Charlotte - Alt.Rachel Stein 2/9/2015 1547 Mt. Philo Rd., Charlotte VT 05445 917-601-5110 rachelstein1@comcast.net Colchester - Rep.Dirk Reith 3/23/2004 97 Fox Run Rd, Colchester VT 05446 879-6547 527-1296 dreith@aol.com Colchester - Alt.Jeffrey Bartley 5/13/2014 887 Jasper Mine Road, Colchester VT 05446 503-5801 jbartley@colchestervt.gov Essex - Rep.Alan Nye 6/18/2001 17 Stannard Drive, Essex Jct. VT 05452 879-7442 872-4165 anyeessex@aol.com Essex - Alt.Max Levy 5/5/2008 8 Bashaw Drive, Essex Jct. VT 05452 878-5267 769-9575 maxglevyinessex@aol.com Essex Jct. - Rep Alan Nye 6/18/2001 17 Stannard Drive, Essex Jct. VT 05452 879-7442 anyeessex@aol.com Essex Jct. - Alt.George Tyler 7/11/2011 5 Acorn Circle, Essex Jct. VT 05452 878-7785 310-8215 gtyler@essexjunction.org Hinesburg - Rep.Lynn Gardner 7/8/1992 PO Box 150, Hinesburg VT 05461 482-2579 482-2325 cliffordlumber@gmavt.net Hinesburg - Alt.Doug Taff 10/4/2010 210 Heron Pond Road, Hinesburg, VT 05461 482-3066 rozisdad@gmavt.net Huntington - Rep.Roman Livak 5/6/2013 8420 Main Rd, Huntington VT 05462 434-2663 romanlivak@gmavt.netHuntington - Alt.Vacant Jericho - Rep.Leslie Nulty 11/19/2009 PO Box 1121, Jericho Ctr. VT 05465 899-4582 lenulty84@gmail.com Jericho - Alt.Albert Lindholm 3/9/1995 PO Box 1054, 33 Bolger Hill Rd. Jericho VT 05465 899-3879 bertlindhm@aol.com Milton - Rep.Donna Barlow Casey 3/21/2016 43 Bombardier Rd., Milton VT 05468 891-8021 dbarlowcasey@town.milton.vt.us Milton - Alt.Erik Wells 3/21/2016 43 Bombardier Rd., Milton VT 05468 891-8020 ewells@town.milton.vt.us Richmond - Rep.Adam Sherman 12/15/2008 158 Church Street, Richmond VT 05477 595-3538 223-7770x128 adamshermanvt@yahoo.com Richmond - Alt.Vacant St. George - Rep.Nina Friscia 10/16/2014 607 Willow Brook Lane, St. George VT 05495 482-7290 917-822-6675 nfrisciasgselectboard@gmail.com St. George - Alt.Maggie Kerrin 6/16/2016 21 Barber St., St. George VT 05495 482-5272 stgeorgevtta@gmail.com Shelburne - Rep.Timothy Loucks 9/14/2011 4040 Greenbush Road, Charlotte VT 05445 985-2236 825-8872 tploucks@gmail.com Shelburne - Alt.Vacant So. Burlington - Rep.Paul Stabler 9/23/1996 75 Butler Dr., So. Burlington VT 05403 862-9283 760-7730 stabler@us.ibm.com So. Burlington - Alt.Mark Boucher 5/21/2007 20 Knoll Circle, South Burlington VT 05403 863-2588 363-0768 marklboucher@comcast.net Underhill - Rep.Dan Steinbauer 7/7/2003 P.O. Box 51, Underhill Ctr. VT 05490 899-3525 dsteinbauer@comcast.net Underhill - Alt.Paul Ruess 7/8/2014 44 Meadow Lane, Underhill VT 05489 899-1399 psruess@comcast.net Westford - Rep.Michelle DaVia 7/13/2007 71 North Road, Westford VT 05494 893-3879 922-2537 mdavia1@hotmail.com Westford - Alt.Vacant Williston - Rep.Craig Abrahams 6/27/2011 855 Ledgewood Drive, Williston VT 05495 578-3677 cabrahams@comcast.netWilliston - Alt.Vacant Winooski - Rep.Ted Regula 6/1/2015 138 Russell St., Winooski VT 05404 655-5964 theodoreregula@hotmail.comWinooski - Alt.Vacant 4/21/2017 SECTION 1 - C Page 1 of 3 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON AND THE CITY OF BURLINGTON WHEREAS, South Burlington is home to the Burlington International Airport (“Airport”), an important contributor to the local, regional, and statewide economy; and, WHEREAS, in 1990, the Airport prepared its first Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) Part 150 Noise Study, and has periodically updated its component Noise Exposure Maps and Noise Compatibility Plans through present day; and, WHEREAS, the FAA’s Noise Exposure Maps include the modeling of weighted day- night average noise levels (“dnl”) for areas surrounding the airport effected by airport noise along with a display of 65+, 70+, and 75+ dnl contour lines; and, WHEREAS, through the FAA’s Noise Compatibility Plan’s home acquisition program, the Airport has acquired residential properties with FAA Airport Improvement Program (AIP) funds since the 1980s; and, WHEREAS, since the start of the FAA’s Noise Compatibility Plan’s voluntary home acquisition program, the City of Burlington has demolished approximately 150 affordable residential homes in the Chamberlin District of South Burlington; and, WHEREAS, updated Noise Exposure Maps were released in late 2015 reflective of then current operations at the Airport, identifying 961 homes within 65+ dnl contours that would be eligible for FAA AIP funds for home acquisition and demolition under the current Noise Compatibility Plan; and, WHEREAS, the 961 homes within the 65+ dnl contours represent a substantial share of “starter” homes and affordable housing in the region; and, WHEREAS, the administrations and legislative bodies in both South Burlington and the City of Burlington have expressed a strong and continued commitment to increasing the supply of affordable and moderately-priced homes in the region through development incentives and housing retention efforts; and, WHEREAS, South Burlington and the City of Burlington recognize the continued need and jointly advocate for affordable housing within the region; and, WHEREAS, the City of Burlington currently has exclusive control over AIP grant applications and participation with the FAA to apply for and accept AIP grants for future home buyouts of these 961 homes, the vast majority of which are located in South Burlington; and, WHEREAS, the City of Burlington has expressed a desire to end future home buyouts and adopt a new Noise Compatibility Plan that does not include home purchases and demolition; Page 2 of 3 NOW THEREFORE, South Burlington and the City of Burlington, for the commitments set forth herein, do hereby state their understanding and intentions to be as follows: 1. The City of South Burlington shall: a. Collaborate with the City of Burlington to come up with and implement an effective plan for airport noise mitigation for residents of South Burlington and neighboring communities. 2. The City of Burlington shall: a. Withhold from applying for or accepting any future grants for home demolition or removal in South Burlington pursuant to the FAA’s 14 CFR Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program. b. To the extent possible, adopt a new Noise Compatibility Plan that does not include the option for home purchase and demolition within the potentially eligible noise contours surrounding the Airport. c. Work in good faith with the City of South Burlington and any other potentially involved communities and organization(s), to come up with alternative noise mitigation solutions other than home demolition or removal in community and residential areas adjacent to the airport that may be effected by airport noise. 3. The City of Burlington and City of South Burlington agree that nothing in this MOU effects homeowners whom have already been identified as eligible for home buyout through an open AIP grant for home acquisition that is open as of the date stated directly above the signatures below. 4. The term of this MOU shall be a ten-year period beginning June 1, 2017, and ending May 31, 2027. 5. South Burlington and the City of Burlington agree that the City of Burlington shall have the right to terminate this MOU for cause. “Cause” shall mean any substantial change to airport operations such that home acquisition and demolition is the only effective means to mitigate known and identifiable health risks that are the direct result of the substantial change to airport operations. 6. The City of Burlington and City of South Burlington agree that each party shall indemnify, defend, save, and hold harmless the other party, its officers, councilors, agents, and employees from any and all liability, loss, damage, claims, causes of action, and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees), caused or asserted to have been caused, directly or indirectly, in connection with the performance of this MOU, to the extent that such liability or damage is caused in whole or in part, by the indemnifying party’s negligence, misconduct, or breach of this MOU. The provisions of this section Page 3 of 3 shall survive termination of this MOU as to acts or omissions occurring prior to the effective date of termination. DATED this _____ day of __________ 2017. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON ________________________________ Duly Authorized CITY OF BURLINGTON ________________________________ Duly Authorized 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com MEMORANDUM TO: Kevin Dorn, City Manager South Burlington City Council FROM: Paul Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning SUBJECT: Draft amendments to the Land Development Regulations & Official Map DATE: May 15, 2017 City Council meeting The Planning Commission, at its meeting on May 9, held public hearings and subsequently voted to approve and submit the attached draft amendments to the Land Development Regulations and Official Map, and their respective and accompanying reports to City Council. The amendments follow several months of review on each of the topics below. The amendments were reviewed by the City’s legal counsel prior to the Commission’s public hearing. The Commission incorporated the recommendations of the City’s legal counsel in its approval. It is staff’s recommendation that the City Council warn a public hearing for June 19, 2016, with two minor changes (see below). As with previous amendments, the Commission and staff would be happy to provide a full summary and presentation of the proposed amendments at that time, and answer any questions that Councilors or the public may have. Included with the amendments is a report prepared by the Planning Commission. The Report includes a brief summary of each of the proposed amendments as well as an assessment of the relationship of the amendments to the city’s Comprehensive Plan pursuant to state law. Purposes of the LDR amendments: (A) Update requirements for bicycle racks, and establish bicycle storage and shower facility requirements; (B) Expand the planned right of way for Williston Road between I-89 and Hinesburg Road and establishment of a planned right-of-way for Market Street; (C) Permit an affordable housing density bonus in the Southeast Quadrant Neighborhood Residential North sub-district, clarify applicability of transferable development rights in affordable housing density bonus housing units within the Southeast Quadrant district; and correct section references for the affordable housing density bonus; (D) Revise standards of review for when street connections are required citywide and enact limitations on lengths of cul-de-sacs in the Southeast Quadrant; 2 (E) Remove redundant lists of allowable uses in the Municipal, Parks & Recreation, R7-Neighborhood Commercial, and Institutional-Agricultural districts and clarify where the lists did not match; (F) Allow unenclosed front porches to extend into the front yard setback for principal buildings in the R4 District; (G) Update Planning Commission (PC) and Development Review Board (DRB)authorization, powers & duties, and membership to reference State Law and/or the City Charter, and expand the authorization for the Design Review Committee as an advisory committee to all advisory committees and update the section as described above for the PC and DRB; (H) Remove agricultural uses that are exempted by State Law, create and define a new use called “Food Hub”, and allow “Food Hub” in the IA, PR, MU, R7, R12, SEQ-NRP, SEQ-NRT, SEQ-NR, SEQ-VR, SEQ-VC, and C1-R12, C1-R15, C1-Auto, C1-LR, AR, SW, IO, C2, and IC districts; (I) Replace the planned street connection between Barrett Street and San Remo Drive with a planned recreation path, add a planned street extending north from Barrett Street, and label the new planned street as a “neighborhood narrow” street type; and, (J) Correct section references, eliminating descriptions of where certain zoning districts are located, add section labels, correct typographical errors, and remove redundant density and dimensional standards in the C1-Auto, C1-LR Allen Road, and Swift Street district and location of parking in the C1- Auto and C1-Air districts Purposes of the Official Map amendments (A) Addition of a planned right of way along Market Street, (B) Addition of a planned street extending north from Barrett Street, and (C) Change from planned street to planned recreation path between San Remo Drive and Barrett Street. Proposed Minor Changes Staff, the City’s Legal Counsel, and the Planning Commission chair discovered AFTER the Planning Commission’s hearing that two inadvertent changes were approved by the Commission. The City Council has the authority under 24 VSA 4442(b) to “may minor changes to the proposed bylaw, amendment, or repeal, but shall not do so less than14 days prior to the final public hearing.” All three parties recommend that the City Council make the following minor changes to the proposed amendments, as the draft language presented to the Commission following legal review had the potential to slightly alter the meaning: Minor Change 1, under affordable housing in the SEQ: Language warned for PC Hearing: Section 9.05(C)(3) In addition, the Development Review Board may allow a residential structures in SEQ-VR and SEQ-VC to have two additional dwelling units per structure, up to a maximum of eight (8) dwelling units per structure, if one or more of the units in the structure is an affordable unit. This provision shall not be interpreted to allow an increase in the total allowable number of units for the project as a whole. 3 Language as approved 5/9/2017: Section 9.05(C)(3) In addition, the Development Review Board may allow a residential structure in SEQ-VR and SEQ-VC to have two additional dwelling units per structure, up to a maximum of eight (8) dwelling units per structure, if one or more of the units in the structure is an affordable unit. In the SEQ-VR and SEQ-VC sub-districts, the Development Review Board may allow no more than eight (8) additional dwelling units in any residential building that includes one or more housing units. This provision shall not be interpreted to allow an increase in the total allowable number of units for the project as a whole. Recommended minor change: Section 9.05(C)(3) In addition the Development Review Board may allow residential structures in SEQ-VR and SEQ-VC to have two additional dwelling units, up to a maximum of eight (8), if one or more of the units in the structure is an affordable unit. In the SEQ-VR and SEQ-VC sub- districts, the Development Review Board may allow residential structures containing one or more affordable dwelling units to have two additional dwelling units, up to a maximum of eight (8) dwelling units per structure. This provision shall not be interpreted to allow an increase in the total allowable number of units for the project as a whole. Reason for request for minor change: The intent of the original amendment was simply a minor grammar correction. The recommended correction at the PC’s hearing unintentionally created a policy change, potentially allowing more units in a single structure than was intended. This minor change would make the grammatical correction while retaining the existing meaning under the current regulations. Minor Change 2, under Food Hub: Language as warned for PC hearing: Section 13.27(A)(3) Butchering or killing of livestock shall not be permitted within the designated food hub area. Language as approved 5/9/2017: Section 13.27(A)(3) Butchering or killing of livestock shall not be permitted. Recommended minor change: Section 13.27(A)(3) Butchering or killing of livestock shall not be permitted within the designated food hub area. Reason for request for minor change: The Planning Commission had intended to retain the additional wording for clarity. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Proposed Amendments to South Burlington Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission Tuesday, May 9, 2017 Index to amendments: Numbered Headings – descriptors of amendment topics Proposed additions red and underlined [or as noted in red boxes on maps & illustrations] Proposed deletions red and strikethrough Notes for users: In Bold Red underlined Table of contents for the draft amendments: 1. End-of-Trip Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities (bike racks, bike storage, showers) ................................................... 1 2. Planned Rights of Way – Expansion of Williston Road and Addition of Market Street ........................................ 4 3. Affordable Housing Bonus in the SEQ (add SEQ-NRN subdistrict, clarify existing language) ............................... 5 4. Standards for determining applicability of required street connections & allowable cul-de-sacs ....................... 6 5. Remove redundant lists and clarify uses permitted in the Institutional-Agricultural district, Municipal District, Recreation & Parks District, and Residential 7-Neighborhood Commercial District ..................................................... 8 6. Allow Unclosed Front Porches to Extend into Principal Building Setback in the R4 District .............................. 12 7. Update Planning Commission, Development Review Board, and Advisory Committees authorization, powers, duties, and membership .............................................................................................................................................. 13 8. Remove Agricultural Uses Exempt by State Law, Create New Food Hub Use allowed in certain districts ......... 16 9. Replace planned street connection between Barrett Street and San Remo Drive with recreation path, add new planned dead-end street north from Barrett Street ............................................................................................ 17 10. Technical corrections, formatting and typos .................................................................................................. 18 1. End-of-Trip Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities (bike racks, bike storage, showers) 2.02 Definitions … Long Term Bicycle Storage. Also called protected bicycle storage. Bicycle parking spaces intended for employees, tenants, and their visitors and intended to provide a high degree of security and protection from the weather when a bicycle is unattended for a period of time in excess of four hours. Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 2 Short Term Bicycle Parking. Also called bicycle parking. Bicycle parking spaces to accommodate customers, patients, employees, clients, and those biking to those locations to do business. 13.14 [reserved] Bicycle Parking and Storage A. Purpose. These standards for short term parking and long term storage of bicycles are intended to recognize and promote cycling as a viable means of transportation and recreation for residents, consumers, visitors, and employees. B. Short Term Bicycle Parking (1) Applicability. These standards apply to any application for development that requires site plan approval under Section 14.03 of the LDRs, and all applications for development of parcels located in the City Center Form Based Codes District. (a) In order to facilitate a reasonable nexus between land development and bicycle parking requirements, applications for development to which these standards apply on parcels with existing development shall be permitted to phase in required short term bicycle parking as follows: (i) For the first application, the applicant shall propose and install at least 50% of the required number of bicycle parking spaces. (ii) Thereafter, any applications for development of the same parcel shall comply with all standards for Short Term Bicycle Parking. (2) Standards for bicycle parking spaces (bps). (a) The minimum number of bicycle parking spaces shall be as indicated on Table 13-10. (b) Bicycle parking shall utilize the ‘Inverted U’ style or as shown as acceptable in Appendix G. (c) If an applicant wishes to install something different, any bps shall meet the following specifications: (i) Allow secure locking of the frame and wheel; (ii) Support a bicycle frame at two points of contact; (iii) Meet the intent of the examples provided in Appendix G. (d) Location & Serviceability. Each bps shall be: (i) Securely anchored to the ground and on a paved surface of at least 2x6 feet; (ii) Spaced to allow easy access to each bicycle and spaced at least 24 inches from obstructions, including walls, doors, posts, columns or landscaping; (iii) Easily accessible from the street or multi-use path and protected from motor vehicles; Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 3 (iv) Visible to passers-by and well-lit to promote usage and enhance security; especially in retrofitted areas, or where good visibility is not achievable, an applicant may be required to install directional signage. (v) Located at principal entrances where reasonably practicable. (vi) Where existing vehicle parking is replaced with bicycle parking in accordance with Section 13.01, note 6, bicycle parking must still meet the standards herein and shall be safely separated from vehicle parking spaces using striping, bollards, islands or other similar measures deemed adequate by the reviewing party. (e) Bicycle parking serving buildings with multiple entrances shall be dispersed so that all principal entrances are served. (f) For office building use, up to 50% of short term bicycle parking requirements may be met by supplementing the (indoor) long term bicycle parking requirements with the required short term bicycle parking spaces. C. Long Term Bicycle Storage (1) Applicability. These standards apply to: (a) Construction of new mixed use or commercial buildings and any new residential building with more than 3 dwelling units; (b) Structural alterations involving the replacement, relocation, or removal of, or other similar changes to, more than 50% of all load bearing walls shall require compliance with all standards for long term bicycle storage. (c) Building additions of more than 5,000 gross square feet in area. (2) Standards (a) For Residential Buildings (i) Secure Storage in bicycle locker, bicycle storage room or private enclosure outside of the private residence that protects entire bicycle, including components and accessories against theft and weather. (ii) Garages which are private to each unit may count towards parking requirements. (b) For Non-Residential Buildings (i) Secure storage in bicycle locker, bicycle storage room or enclosure that protects entire bicycle, including components and accessories against theft and weather; (ii) Where indicated in Table 13-11, clothes lockers shall be lockable with the following dimensions: minimum 12” wide, 18” deep, 36” high. Lockers do not need to be in same place as bicycle storage; (iii) Secure office space (private offices, common space with ability to lock bicycles, etc.) may account for up to 50% of the required indoor parking areas and lockers; Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 4 (iv) Shower and changing facilities dependent on the number of bicycles required to be stored and as indicated on Table 13-10. Table 13-10. Bicycle Parking Requirements Type of Activity Short Term Bike Parking Long Term Bike Storage Residential buildings with more than 3 units 1 for every 10 units; minimum 41 1 for every unit Warehousing, contractor, and light industry 1 per 20k SF; minimum 2 2 per tenant Retail, restaurant, office, and all other 1 per 5k SF; minimum 4 50% of required short term bike parking spaces. Educational 1 space for each 20 students of planned capacity. For new buildings only, one space for each 20 employees. 1 May request waiver from minimum per building for buildings with less than 6 units if Development Review Board finds the need is adequately met for visitors. Table 13-11. Long Term parking – shower and changing room facility requirements Number of protected long term bicycle parking spaces Changing facility Unisex Showers Clothes Lockers 1-3 none none 1 4 – 9 12 12 3 For every 10 12 12 40% of LTB parking 2 if unisex, units available to any gender; otherwise provide one per gender Notes applicable to Tables 13-1 through 13-6: 1. If all parking spaces are common, i.e. non-reserved, and if there are more than 10 DUs, the requirement decreases to 2 spaces per DU 2. Any spaces required as part of the operational function, such as display, storage or queuing spaces at the transfer station or service station, are in addition 3. Add 3 per 1,000 SF GFA for retail areas plus 3.5 per 1,000 SF GFA for office space 4. Parking need varies according to type of facility and will be determined during site plan approval 5. For the City Center FBC District (Article 8), these tables do not apply. See applicable Transect Zone Building Envelope Standards 6. Bicycle parking may substitute for up to 25% of required parking. For every five required bicycle parking spaces that meet the short or long term bicycle parking standards, the motor vehicle parking requirement is reduced by one space. Existing parking may be converted to take advantage of this provision 2. Planned Rights of Way – Expansion of Williston Road and Addition of Market Street Table 3-1 Existing and Planned Street Rights-of-Way Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 5 Street Existing Street ROW (feet) Minimum Planned Street ROW (feet) Airport Drive 66 80 Airport Parkway 66 66 Allen Road 66 66 Dorset Street, north of Swift 66 100 Dorset Street, south of Swift 66 66 Hinesburg Road 66 80 Kennedy Drive 100 100 Kimball Avenue 100 100 Market Street 80 80 Patchen Road 66 66 Shelburne Road 100 100 Shunpike Road, east of Kimball Avenue 80 80 Spear Street 66 66 Swift Street 50 66 Williston Road, east of the Hinesburg Road-Patchen Road intersection 66 90 Williston Road, from the Hinesburg-Patchen Road intersection west 66 90 100 3. Affordable Housing Bonus in the SEQ (add SEQ-NRN subdistrict, clarify existing language) 9.05 Residential Density … C. Affordable Housing Density Increase. (1) Affordable housing bonuses pursuant to Section 13.14 18.02 are allowed in the SEQ- NR, SEQ-NRN, SEQ-NRT, SEQ-VR, and SEQ-VC sub-districts. If affordable housing, as defined in Article 2 and regulated in Article 18 13 of these Regulations, is proposed as part of an application for development application, the Development Review Board may grant a density increase in any of the eligible SEQ sub-districts according to the requirements of Section 13.14 18.02. (2) Calculation of the allowed density increase (i.e. 25% or 50% per Section 13.14 18.02) shall be based on the maximum allowable overall density of the project as a whole, including non-contiguous sending parcels where applicable. If a development plan is approved by the Development Review Board meeting, the applicable average density may be increased on the development parcel sufficient to accommodate the affordable housing units. (3) In addition, the Development Review Board may allow a residential structure in SEQ-VR and SEQ-VC to have two additional dwelling units per structure, up to a maximum of eight (8) dwelling units per structure, if one or more of the units in the Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 6 structure is an affordable unit. In the SEQ-VR and SEQ-VC sub-districts, the Development Review Board may allow no more than eight (8) additional dwelling units in any residential building that includes one or more housing units. This provision shall not be interpreted to allow an increase in the total allowable number of units for the project as a whole. (4) When an affordable housing density increase is granted in accordance with this Section and Section 18.02, the designated affordable dwelling units shall not constitute units for the purposes of calculation of Transferable Development Rights. 4. Standards for determining applicability of required street connections & allowable cul-de-sacs 9.08 SEQ-NRT, SEQ-NR, and SEQ-NRN Sub-Districts; Specific Standards A. Street, block and lot pattern. … (2) Interconnection of Streets (a) Average spacing between intersections shall be 300 to 500 feet. (b) Dead end streets (e.g. cul de sac or hammer-head) that are not constructed to an adjacent parcel to allow for a future connection are strongly discouraged. Such Ddead end streets shall not exceed 200 feet in length. (c) Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4). (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section 15.12(D)(4) of these Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly encouraged. (4 3) Lot ratios. Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1:2.5 to 1:5 recommended. 9.09 SEQ-VR Sub-District; Specific Standards A. Street, Block and Lot Pattern (1) Interconnection of Streets (a) Average spacing between intersections shall be 300 to 500 feet. (b) Dead end streets (e.g. cul de sac or hammer-head) that are not constructed to an adjacent parcel to allow for a future connection are strongly discouraged. Such Ddead end streets shall not exceed 200 feet in length. (c) Street stubs are required at the end of dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per section 15.12(D)(4). Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 7 (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line and connected to adjacent parcels per section 15.12(D)(4) of these Regulations. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly encouraged. (4 3) Lot ratios. Lots shall maintain a minimum lot width to depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1:2.5 to 1:5 recommended. 9.10 SEQ-VC Sub-District; Specific Regulations A. Street, block and lot pattern. (2) Interconnection of Streets (a) Average intersection spacing shall be 200 to 300 feet. (b) Dead end streets (e.g. cul de sacs or hammer-heads) that are not constructed to an adjacent parcel to allow for a future connection are strongly discouraged. Such D dead end streets shall not exceed 200 feet in length. (c) Street stubs are required at dead end streets to allow for future street connections and/or bicycle and pedestrian connections to open space and future housing on adjoining parcels per Section 15.12(D)(4). (3) Street Connection to Adjoining Parcels. Street stubs are required to be built to the property line per Section 15.12(D)(4) of these Regulations to allow connection to adjacent parcels. Posting signs with a notice of intent to construct future streets is strongly encouraged. (4 3) Lot ratios. Lots for new residential structures shall incorporate a minimum lot width to lot depth ratio of 1:2, with a ratio of 1:2.5 to 1:5 recommended. 15.12 Standards for Roadways, Parking and Circulation … D. Criteria for Public and Private Roadways. … (4) Connections to adjacent parcels. (a) If the DRB finds that a roadway or recreation path extension or connection to an adjacent property may or could occur in the future, whether through City action or development of an adjacent parcel, the DRB shall require the applicant to construct the connector roadway to the property line or contribute to the full cost of completing the roadway connection. (b) In determining whether a connection to an adjacent property may or could occur, and the location and configuration of such connection, the DRB may consider: (i) The existence of planned roadways or recreation paths in the City’s Comprehensive Plan, Official Map, or these Regulations; (ii) The requirements of the Zoning District in which the adjacent property is located and whether these Regulations allow additional development or development density on the adjacent parcel; Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 8 (iii) The context of the proposed development’s setting in relation to the adjacent property; (iv) The presence of physical obstacles to such a connection, such as wetlands, water bodies, or steep slopes; (v) The presence of legal restrictions to development or use on the adjacent property; and/or; (vi) Any other information it deems necessary to make its determination. (c) If the DRB finds that a roadway or recreation path connection to an adjacent property may or could occur, but the maximum allowed length of the proposed dead end street will not connect the roadway or recreation path to the adjacent property, the DRB may accept a dedication of a right-of-way to the property line and/or impose a condition that any future development on the property requires construction of the roadway or recreation path to the property line. (ad) In any such application, the DRB shall require For roadway connections, sSufficient right-of-way shall be to be dedicated to accommodate two (2) lanes of vehicle travel, City utilities, and a ten-foot wide grade-separated recreation path. For independent recreation path connections, a right-of-way with a minimum width of twenty feet (20’) is required. (e) Any such roadway or recreation path shall include one or more signs indicating the intent to construct future connections to the street or recreation path. (5) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the authority of the DRB to grant waivers of public roadway standards subject to the provisions of §15.12(D)(4). 5. Remove redundant lists and clarify uses permitted in the Institutional-Agricultural district, Municipal District, Recreation & Parks District, and Residential 7-Neighborhood Commercial District 4.06 RESIDENTIAL 7 WITH NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT - R7-NC … C. Permitted and Conditional Uses. Those uses indicated in Table C-1, Table of Uses, and accessory uses to those uses. (1) Residential as principal permitted uses as per Residential 7 District regulations and accessory dwelling units as conditional uses. (2) Office (3) Medical office (4) Retail, not including shopping centers or general merchandise stores (5) Gasoline filling station with consumer convenience center (6) Personal service establishment (7) Retail food establishment, not to exceed 5,000 square feet in gross floor area Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 9 (8) Accessory uses customary to the uses listed above 7.01 Institutional and Agricultural District I-A … C. Uses. In the Institutional and Agricultural District, principal permitted uses and conditional uses shall be those shown in Table C-1, Table of Uses. C. Permitted Uses. The following uses are permitted in the Institutional- Agricultural District. (1) Agriculture, forestry and horticultural uses (ALL) (2) Retail sale of agricultural, forest or horticultural products produced on site. Such use shall be subject to site plan review in accordance with Article 14 of these Regulations. (ALL) (3) Keeping of livestock (ALL) (4) Single-family dwelling related to agriculture, forestry or horticultural use (ALL) (5) Additional dwelling units for farm employees, subject to site plan review in accordance with Article 14 of these Regulations. (ALL) (6) Park (ALL) (7) Recreation path, subject to site plan review in accordance with Article 14 of these Regulations. (ALL) (8) Hospice (ALL) (9) Educational facility with customary educational support facilities, reviewed as a Planned Unit Development in accordance with Article 15 of these Regulations, and including without limitation the following uses in conjunction with a principal educational facility use: (a) Cultural facility (ALL) (b) Group quarters (ALL) (c) Office (ALL) (d) Medical office (ALL) (e) Place of worship (ALL) (f) Recreation facility, indoor (NORTH ONLY) (g) Recreation facility, outdoor (NORTH ONLY) (h) Research facility or laboratory (ALL) (i) Photocopy and printing shop with accessory retail sales (NORTH ONLY) (j) Personal service. Use is limited to 5,000 SF GFA per tenant with a maximum of 15,000 SF GFA total footprint for the building. Tenants shall have separate entrances from one another and no direct passageways from one to another. (NORTH ONLY) (k) Short-order restaurant, within a principal permitted structure (NORTH ONLY) (l) Retail sales. Use is limited to 5,000 SF GFA per tenant with a maximum of 15,000 SF GFA total footprint for the building. Tenants shall have separate entrances from one another and no direct passageways from one to another. (NORTH ONLY) (m) Social services (NORTH ONLY) (n) Accessory uses to the uses listed above in the applicable district (i.e. North only or all) D. Conditional Uses. The following uses are allowed in the Institutional-Agricultural District as conditional uses subject to approval by the Development Review Board as a Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 10 Planned Unit Development in accordance with the provisions of this Section 7.01 and Table C-2, Dimensional Standards. (1) Accessory residential dwelling units (2) Day care facility (3) Municipal building (4) Parking facility (NORTH ONLY) (5) Public utility substation and transmission lines (6) Group home (7) Cemetery (8) Accessory uses to the uses listed above in the applicable district (i.e. North only or all) D E. Area, Density and Dimensional Requirements. In the Institutional-Agricultural District, all requirements of this Section 7.01 and Table C-2, Dimensional Standards shall apply. E F. Additional Standards. All applications within this District shall be subject to the following additional standards: (1) For properties in the Institutional-Agricultural district west of Spear Street and north of Quarry Hill Road, an undeveloped area shall be maintained for a minimum of sixty-five (65) feet between the boundary of any adjacent residential zoning district and any new non-residential structure. The DRB may require landscaping or other suitable screening in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.06 of these Regulations to ensure adequate buffering between new non-residential structures and adjacent residential districts. (2) For all other properties in the Institutional-Agricultural district, an undeveloped area shall be maintained for a minimum of one hundred (100) feet between the boundary of any adjacent residential zoning district. The yard shall be kept free of buildings, structures, parking lots and facilities, and access drives other than those required to cross through the required yard. The DRB may require landscaping or other suitable screening in accordance with the provisions of Section 3.06 of these Regulations to ensure adequate buffering between new non-residential structures and adjacent residential districts. (3) Educational facilities and educational support facilities in the Commercial 1 district shall be subject to the dimensional standards and requirements of the Institutional-Agricultural North district. (4) Educational Support Facility. Any Educational Support Facility shall be designed and intended to function as a complement to the intended educational use of the property. Such uses shall be secondary to the principal educational use of the property and shall be intended to principally serve students, faculty, and staff of the educational use. 7.02 Park and Recreation District PR … C. Uses. In the Parks and Recreation District, principal permitted uses and conditional uses shall be those shown in Table C-1, Table of Uses. Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 11 C. Permitted Uses. The following uses are permitted in the Park and Recreation District. (1) Agriculture, forestry and horticultural uses (2) Retail sale of agricultural, forest or horticultural products produced on site. Such use shall be subject to site plan review in accordance with Article 14 of these Regulations. (3) Keeping of livestock (4) Park (5) Single-family dwelling related to agriculture, forestry or horticultural use (6) Additional dwelling units for farm employees, subject to site plan review in accordance with Article 14 of these Regulations. (7) Recreation path (8) Indoor recreation facility (9) Outdoor recreation facility (10) Not-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is the provision of educational or research services related to agriculture, horticulture, forestry, natural resource preservation, arts or recreation. D. Conditional Uses. The following uses are allowed in the Park and Recreation District as conditional uses subject to approval by the Development Review Board as a Planned Unit Development in accordance with the provisions of this Section 7.02 and Table C-1, Table of Uses. (1) Public utility substation and transmission lines (2) Day care center (3) Accessory residential dwelling units D E. Area, Density and Dimensional Requirements. In the Park and Recreation District, all requirements of this Section 7.02 and Table C-2, Dimensional Standards shall apply. E F. Additional Standards. All applications within this District shall be subject to the following additional standardsIn reviewing any Permitted or Conditional Use proposed under this Section shall meet the following standards in addition to those in Article 14 of these Regulations: (1) The proposed use will provide an affirmative public benefit to the City and its citizens. (2) The proposed use will be compatible with and protect the ability to preserve public recreational use and planned open spaces and natural areas on the project site. (3) The proposed use will include areas that may be used or accessed by the general public. 7.03 Municipal District MU … C. Uses. In the Municipal District, principal permitted uses and conditional uses shall be those shown in Table C-1, Table of Uses. C. Permitted Uses. The following uses are permitted in the Municipal District: Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 12 (1) Agriculture, forestry and horticultural uses (2) Retail sale of agricultural, forest or horticultural products produced on site. Such use shall be subject to site plan review in accordance with Article 14 of these Regulations. (3) Keeping of livestock (4) Single-family dwelling related to agriculture, forestry or horticultural use (5) Additional dwellings for farm employees, subject to site plan review in accordance with Article 14 of these Regulations. (6) Community center (7) Public educational facility (8) Recreation path (9) Municipal building (10) Private providers of public services (11) Recreation facility, indoor (12) Recreation facility, outdoor (13) Offices incidental and subordinate to a permitted use listed above D. Conditional Uses. The following uses are allowed in the Municipal District as conditional uses subject to approval by the Development Review Board in accordance with the provisions of this Section 7.03 and Table C-1, Table of Uses. (1) Day care centers (2) Public utility substation and transmission lines (3) Waste handling and transfer facilities (4) Commercial or public parking facility D E. Area, Density and Dimensional Requirements. In the Municipal District, all requirements of this Section 7.03 and Table C-2, Dimensional Standards shall apply. E F. Additional Standards. All applications within this District shall be subject to the following additional standards In reviewing any Permitted or Conditional Use proposed under this Section shall meet the following standards in addition to those in Article 14 of these Regulations: (1) The proposed use will provide an affirmative public benefit to the City and its citizens. (2) The proposed use will be compatible with and protect the ability to preserve public recreational use and planned open spaces and natural areas on the project site. Appendix C: Table of Uses – SEE CHANGES AT THE END OF THIS DOCUMENT. 6. Allow Unclosed Front Porches to Extend into Principal Building Setback in the R4 District 2.02 Specific Definitions … Porch: a covered but unenclosed projection from the main wall of a building. Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 13 Porch, open: A porch, open on three sides. Railings or walls on the sides shall not exceed 40 inches in height from the porch floor. Porch, enclosed: A porch, enclosed on two or more sides by glass, plastic, netting, wire, walls, or similar temporary or permanent materials at a height above 40 inches from the porch floor. 3.06 Setbacks and Buffers … K. Front Setback for Front Decks and Porches in the R4 District In the R4 District, an open porch or deck that shall not exceed the width of the building face to which the porch or deck is attached and that shall not have a depth greater than 12 feet as measured from the building face, shall have a minimum front setback of 10 feet. Access steps not greater than 5 feet in width may project no more than 5 feet in front of the porch or deck, but in no case shall be located closer than 5 feet from the front property line. An enclosed porch, or an open porch or deck exceeding 12 feet in depth, shall be considered part of the principal building and subject to standard front setbacks. 7. Update Planning Commission, Development Review Board, and Advisory Committees authorization, powers, duties, and membership 17.07 Planning Commission A. Authorization. The City of South Burlington Planning Commission is established via the City Charter, 24 V.S.A. App §13-701City Council shall appoint a Planning Commission. B. Members and Terms of Office. Membership and Terms of Office for the Planning Commission are set forth in the City Charter, 24 V.S.A. App §13-701. All members shall be appointed by the City Council. All members may be compensated and reimbursed by the City of South Burlington for necessary and reasonable expenses. All members of the Planning Commission shall be residents of the City of South Burlington. Any member may be removed at any time by a unanimous vote of the City Council. If a member relocates to another municipality before his or her term of office expires, such member shall be replaced. D. Powers, Duties, and Procedural Rules. The Planning Commission shall elect its chair, vice-chairman and a clerk. and shall exercise all powers and duties as provided for in the City Charter, 24 V.S.A. App. § 13-702. The Planning Commission shall keep a record of its resolutions, transactions, and findings of fact, which shall be maintained as a public record of the municipality. The Planning Commission shall adopt by majority vote of those members present and voting such rules as it deems necessary and appropriate for the performance of its functions. Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 14 E. Powers and Duties. The planning commission shall exercise all powers and duties as provided for in the City Charter, 24 V.S.A. App. § 13-702. 17.08 Development Review Board A. Authorization. The City of South Burlington Development Review Board is established by the City Council via resolution in accordance with shall appoint a Development Review Board24 V.S.A. §4460. B. Members. Board membership is set forth in 24 V.S.A. §4460 and as adopted by City Council resolution. The development review board shall have not fewer than five (5) nor more than nine (9) voting members. All members shall be appointed by the City Council. All members may be compensated and reimbursed by the City of South Burlington for necessary and reasonable expenses. The City Council may appoint alternates to the members to serve in situations when one or more members of the board are disqualified or are otherwise unable to serve. Vacancies shall be filled by the City Council for the unexpired terms and upon the expiration of such terms. Each member of the Development Review Board may be removed for cause by the City Council upon written charges and after public hearing. C. Term of Office [reserved]. Four Board members shall have terms of four years and three board members shall have terms of three years. D. Procedural Rules. The Development Review Board shall elect its own officers, and adopt rules of procedure, and operate pursuant to subject to Vermont Municipal Planning and Development Act Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 117, V.S.A. Section 4462 §4461. Meetings shall be held two times each month or at the call of the chairman and at such times as the board may determine. All meetings of the board shall be open to the public. The board shall keep minutes of its proceedings, showing the vote of each member upon each question, or, if absent or failing to vote, indicating this. The board shall keep records of its examinations and other official actions, all of which shall be immediately filed in the City Clerk's office as a public record. For the conduct of any hearing and the taking of any action, a quorum shall not be less than a majority of the members of the board, and any action thereof shall be taken by the concurrence of a majority of the board. 17.0910 Advisory Committees Design Review Committee A. Authorization. The City of South Burlington City Council may appoint one of more advisory committees in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4433. a Design Review Committee to advise the Development Review Board and the Planning Commission. B. Membership and terms of office. Advisory committee membership and terms of office are set forth in 24 V.S.A. §4433 and as adopted by City Council resolution. Any Design Review Committee shall have not fewer than five (5) voting members. All members shall be appointed by the City Council. All members may be compensated and Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 15 reimbursed by the City of South Burlington for necessary and reasonable expenses. All members of a design review committee shall be residents of the City of South Burlington. The City Council may appoint alternates to the members to serve in situations when one or more members of the board are disqualified or are otherwise unable to serve. C. Term of Office. The term of each member shall be three (3) years, except that the terms of the members first appointed shall be so staggered that no more than two shall be reappointed or replaced during any future calendar year. Any appointment to fill a vacancy shall be for the unexpired term and shall be made as soon as practicable. If a member relocates to another municipality before his or her term of office expires, such member shall be replaced by the City Council. Each member of a Design Review Committee may be removed for cause upon written charges and after public hearing held before the City Council. In such a case, a majority of voting members of the City Council shall be required to remove a committee member. D. Powers, Duties, and Procedural Rules. Advisory committees shall elect its own officers, adopt rules of procedure, and operate pursuant to 24 V.S.A. §4433, §4461 and §4464(d). A Design Review Committee shall elect its own officers and adopt rules of procedure, subject to Vermont Municipal Planning and Development Act Title 24, Part 2, Chapter 117, Section 4462. Meetings shall be held no less than once a month or at the call of the chairman and at such times as the committee may determine. All meetings of the committee shall be open to the public. The committee shall keep minutes of its proceedings, showing the vote of each member upon each question, or, if absent or failing to vote, indicating this. The committee shall keep records of its examinations and other official actions, all of which shall be immediately filed in the City Clerk's office as a public record. For the taking of any action, a quorum shall not be less than a majority of the members of the committee, and any action thereof shall be taken by the concurrence of a majority of the committee. E. Powers and Duties. (1) General. A design review committee is authorized to administer design review regulations as contained in these regulations. The committee may examine or cause to be examined any property, maps, books, or records bearing upon the matters concerned in a design review proceeding. 17.101 Amendments to Regulations and Maps [reserved] 17.121 Violations [reserved] 17.132 Penalties [reserved] 17.143 Appeals Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 16 An interested party may appeal any decision or act of the Administrative Officer to the Development Review Board within fifteen (15) days of the date of the decision or act in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4465. 8. Remove Agricultural Uses Exempt by State Law, Create New Food Hub Use allowed in certain districts Section 2.02 Definitions Agriculture (Farming). shall include any of the following land use activities exempt from zoning regulation pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4413(d), as amended. conducted in accordance with state-defined accepted agricultural practices and/or best management practices.: the cultivation or other use of land for growing food, fiber, Christmas trees, maple sap, or horticultural and orchard crops; or the raising, feeding, or management of livestock, poultry, fish, or bees; or the operation of greenhouses; or the production of maple syrup; or the on-site storage, preparation and sale of agricultural products principally produced on the farm; or the on-site storage, preparation, production, and sale of fuel or power from agricultural products or wastes principally produced on the farm; or the raising, feeding, or management of four or more equines owned or boarded by the farmer, including training, showing, and providing instruction and lessons in riding, training, and the management of equines. Food hub. A facility that serves as the central location for the aggregation, storage, processing, distribution, and/or marketing of local and source-identified food. A food hub is closely aligned with a farm stand with respect to the types of products available. The principal function of a food hub shall be to provide local farmers and food producers predictable and coordinated access to individuals, retailers, and institutions. This is encouraged to be a distribution point for shares in Community Supported Agriculture (CSAs). A Food Hub is not a “Retail Sales” use. A food hub is not intended for consumers to shop through a wide variety of goods, especially those goods or food products that are neither processed nor grown locally, throughout most of the day, week, and year. A food hub may also constitute an organization responsible for the roles listed herein, and may include technical assistance to local farmers in conjunction with its duties as a central location. TABLE 13-3: PARKING REQUIREMENTS, AGRICUTURAL USES Use Spaces Required Notes Horticulture & forestry with on-premise sales 1 per employee plus 2 per 1,000 SF GFA Horticulture & forestry, no on-premise sales 1 per employee Keeping of livestock on 10 acres or more 1 per employee Single-family dwelling related to agriculture 2 per DU Additional dwelling for farm employees 1 per bedroom TABLE 13-4: PARKING REQUIREMENTS, PUBLIC AND QUASI-PUBLIC USES Use Spaces Required Notes Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 17 Place of worship 0.5 per seat Community center 0.33 per maximum permitted occupancy Cultural facility 0.33 per maximum permitted occupancy Use (continued) Parking Space Requirement Notes Educational facility: elementary and secondary schools 1 per classroom and other rooms used by students, staff or faculty, plus 0.25 per student of driving age Educational facility: college, university, or professional school 1 per classroom and other rooms used by students, staff or faculty, plus 0.50 per student Food Hub 1 per employee plus 2 per 1,000 SF GFA Personal instruction facility 2 per employee Municipal facility 3 per 1,000 SF GFA Educational support facilities 2 per 1,000 SF GFA [STAFF NOTE: parking table cut off in memo only for brevity] 13.27 Food Hubs A. Specific standards (1) Processing activities at the food hub location shall be limited to non- mechanized packaging, provided it is subordinate to the distribution activities. (2) Storage is permissible for terms of less than 30 days. (3) Butchering or killing of livestock shall not be permitted. (4) A food hub may be host to- with no greater frequency than once per week- a farmer’s market without additional municipal review or permitting. (5) Edible landscaping is strongly encouraged; the value of edible landscaping used at Food Hub sites shall be counted towards the minimum landscaping budget as 150% of every dollar planted. B. Permitting (1) Facilities under 5,000 GFA may be reviewed under Section 14.09, Administrative Review. (2) Facilities larger than 5,000 GFA shall require DRB Site Plan review in accordance with Chapter 14 of these Regulations. Appendix C: Table of Uses – SEE CHANGES AT THE END OF THIS MEMO. 9. Replace planned street connection between Barrett Street and San Remo Drive with recreation path, add new planned dead-end street north from Barrett Street 8.04 Blocks, Streets, and Alleys Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 18 A. General Standards (5) Connectivity. All existing or proposed streets shall connect directly at each end to another existing public street, or planned or proposed street listed as a qualifying street type in the applicable BES. This requirement, however, shall not apply to the planned street extending north from Barrett Street depicted on the City Center Form Based Code Primary & Secondary Street & Block Standard applicability map. 10. Technical corrections, formatting and typos • Conditional Use Procedural clarification. 14.10 Conditional Use Review: General Provisions and Standards D. Review and Approval Procedure. A use designated as a conditional use in any district may be permitted by the Development Review Board, after public notice and public hearing, according to the following procedures: (1) Any conditional use shall be either: (a) is subject to site plan review, except as provided for in Section 14.03(B), and shall be therefore reviewed under the requirements of Article 14, Site Plan and Conditional Use Review; or, (b) is subject to planned unit development review and shall be therefore reviewed under the requirements of Article 15, Planned Unit Development. • Listing of SEQ-NRN District. 3.01 Establishment of Districts and Description of Certain Districts A. Establishment of Districts. (1) Residential Districts R1 Residential 1 District R1-PRD Residential 1 with Planned Residential Development District R1-Lakeshore Residential 1- Lakeshore District R2 Residential 2 District R4 Residential 4 District R7 Residential 7 District R12 Residential 12 District LN Lakeshore Neighborhood District QCP Queen City Park District SEQ-NRP Southeast Quadrant-Natural Resource Protection District SEQ-NRT Southeast Quadrant-Neighborhood Residential Transition District SEQ-NR Southeast Quadrant-Neighborhood Residential District SEQ-NRN Southeast Quadrant Neighborhood Residential North District SEQ-VR Southeast Quadrant-Village Residential District • Parking in front of buildings in R7-NC. Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 19 4.06 RESIDENTIAL 7 WITH NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT - R7-NC … E. Additional Standards. … (3) Access, parking, and internal circulation: (a) Parking requirements may be modified, depending in the extent of shared parking, the presence of sidewalks or recreation paths, and residences lying within walking distance (defined as no further than one-fourth of mile for purposes of this zoning district). Any requirements for shared access and/or parking must be secured by permanent legal agreements acceptable to the City Attorney. (b) Parking shall be placed to the side or rear of the structures if possible. (c b) Parking areas shall be designed for efficient internal circulation and the minimum number of curb cuts onto the public roadway. (d c) Access improvements and curb cut consolidation may be required. (e d) Where existing residential dwellings are converted to nonresidential use, the residential appearance of the structure shall be retained. • Location Descriptions of C1-AUTO and C1-AIR districts. Removes the description of the location of these two districts. Other districts do not have such descriptions; they simply use the map. 5.02 COMMERCIAL 1 WITH AUTOMOBILE SALES DISTRICT (C1-AUTO) … C. [RESERVED] Location. This area is generally bounded to the south by Holmes Road, to the west by the western boundaries of 1185 - 1325 Shelburne Road and Fayette Road, to the north by the northern boundary of the South Burlington Cemetery Property west of Shelburne Road and the northern boundary of 1030 Shelburne Road east of Shelburne Road, and to the east by the R4 District boundary north of Baldwin Avenue and the centerline of Shelburne Road south of Baldwin Avenue. After the adoption of these land development regulations, new C1-AUTO districts shall be permitted only upon action of the Planning Commission and City Council and where the existing zoning is Commercial 1 (C1). 5.03 COMMERCIAL 1 DISTRICT WITH AIRPORT USES C1-AIR … C. [RESERVED] Location. After the adoption of these Regulations, new C1-AIR districts shall be permitted only upon action of the Planning Commission and City Council and only where the pre-existing zoning is Commercial 1 (C1), or where the new district is adjacent to the Burlington International Airport or to an existing Airport District or Airport Industrial District. • SEQ-NRN dimensions. TABLE C-2 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS APPLICABLE IN ALL DISTRICTS Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 20 Single-family 12,000 SF (1.2)15%**30%20 10 30 15 25 28 2 3 1 4Two-family 24,000 SF (1.2)15%30%20 10 30 15 25 28 2 3 1 4 All other uses 40,000 SF (1.2)15%30%20 20 30 15 25 28 2 3 1 4 SEQ-NRP, NRT, NRN* and NR * See Article 9 for additional dimensional standards in the SEQ-NRN subdistrict. Where a conflicts exists, the more restrive shall apply. • Dimensional standards, C1-LR, AR, SW districts. Appendix C Table of Dimensions • Density in C1-Auto district. Appendix C Table of Dimensions • Typographic correction in approval process. 17.04 Expiration of Permits and Approvals … B. Expiration of Approvals. Buildings only Buildings, parking and all other impervious surfaces Front(s)Side yard(s)Rear Accessory Principal (flat)Principal (pitched)Stories Facing Street Stories Below Roofline Roofline Stories [see section 3.07(B)] Total Stories Maximum site coverage: Maximum Building HeightStandard setbacks (feet):District Land Use Minimum lot size (max. residential density in dwelling units per acre) Single-family 6,000 SF (12)30%40%30 10 30 15 25 28 2 3 1 4 Two-family 8,000 SF (12)30%40%30 10 30 15 25 28 2 3 1 4 Multi-family 3,500 SF/unit (12)40%70%30 10 30 15 35 40 Retail (principal permitted use, max. 5,000 SF GFA) 20,000 SF 40%70%30 10 30 15 35 40 Other n Non-residential uses 20,000 SF 40%70%30 10 30 15 35 40 C1-LR Single-family 6,000 SF (12)30%40%30 10 30 15 25 28 2 3 1 4 Two-family 8,000 SF (12)30%40%30 10 30 15 25 28 2 3 1 4 Multi-family 3,500 SF/unit (12)40%70%30 10 30 15 35 40 Retail (principal permitted use, max. 5,000 SF GFA) 20,000 SF 40%70%30 10 30 15 35 40 Other n Non- residential uses 20,000 SF 40%70%30 10 30 15 35 40 AR Single-family 6,000 SF (7)30%40%30 10 30 15 25 28 2 3 1 4 Two-family 10,000 SF (7)30%40%30 10 30 15 25 28 2 3 1 4 Multi-family 6,000 SF/unit (7)30%40%30 10 30 15 35 40 Retail (principal permitted use, max. 5,000 SF GFA) 20,000 SF 40%70%30 10 30 15 35 40 Other n Non- residential uses 20,000 SF 40%70%30 10 30 15 35 40 SW Buildings only Buildings, parking and all other impervious surfaces Front(s)Side yard(s) Rear Accessory Principal (flat) Principal (pitched) Stories Facing Street Stories Below Roofline Roofline Stories [see section 3.07(B)] Total Stories Maximum site coverage: Maximum Building HeightStandard setbacks (feet):District Land Use Minimum lot size (max. residential density in dwelling units per acre) C1-Auto Multi-family 3,500 SF/unit (12 or 15)40%70%30 15 30 15 35 40All other uses 40,000 SF 40%70%30 15 30 15 35 40 Draft Amendments to Land Development Regulations Approved by the Planning Commission 5-9-2017 21 (a) The Development Review Board or Administrative Officer has approved a request for extension of the approval. The Board or Administrative Officer may approve one (1) extension to an applicant of an approval if reapplication takes place before the approval has expired and if the Board determines that conditions are essentially unchanged from the time of the original approval. In granting such an extension, the Board or Administrative Officer may specify a period of time of up to one (1) year for the extension. APPENDIX C USES and DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS C-Residential/Institutional 1 South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective June 27, 2016 RESIDENTIAL & INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICTS IA(1)PR MU R1 R2 R4 R7 R7- NC(2) R12 LN QCP SEQ- NRP SEQ- NRT SEQ-NR SEQ-VR SEQ- VC(2) Residential Uses Single-family dwelling P P P P PUD PUD P P P P P P P Two-family dwelling PUD P P P PUD PUD P P P P P P Multi-family dwelling PUD PUD P PUD PUD PUD C PUD P P Accessory residential units Group home or Residential Care Home C P P P P PUD PUD P P P P P P P Agricultural Uses Agricultural uses consistent with State- defined "Farming" activity Horticulture & forestry with on-premise sales Horticulture & forestry, no on-premise sales Keeping of livestock on 10 acres or more P P P P P P P P P Single-family dwelling related to agriculture P P P P P P P P P P P P P Additional dwellings for farm employees P P P P P P P P P P P P P Public & Quasi-Public Uses Cemeteries Community center PUD P P P C P P P Congregate care, assisted living, or continuum of care facility C-TO C C C Cultural facility PUD (11) Educational facility PUD P C C C Educational support facilities PUD Funeral homes, mortuaries, and crematoriums C C Group quarters PUD (11) Hospice PUD P Municipal facility C C P Parks Personal instruction facility P P (6) Place of worship PUD (11)P P P P P P P P P P Recreation paths Institutional Residential Southeast Quadrant Please See Section 3.10 for Regulations Conditional in all districts Permitted in all districts Permitted in all districts Permitted in all districts; 3 acre minimum lot size in all districts. Permitted in all districts Exempt from local regulation in all districts APPENDIX C USES and DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS C-Residential/Institutional 2 South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective June 27, 2016 RESIDENTIAL & INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICTS IA(1)PR MU R1 R2 R4 R7 R7- NC(2) R12 LN QCP SEQ- NRP SEQ- NRT SEQ-NR SEQ-VR SEQ- VC(2) Institutional Residential Southeast Quadrant Social services PUD C-TO C Commercial Uses Adult use Auto & motorcycle service and repair, accessory use, no fueling pumps C Bed and breakfast, min. 1 acre lot C C C C C C C C(3) Family child care home, registered or licensed P P P P P P P P P P P P P Child care facility, licensed non-residential C C(12)P(12)P P (4)P Commercial greenhouse C-ACC Commercial or public parking facility N-PUD (11)C Food Hub P(7)P(6)P(6)P(6)P(7)P(7)P(6)P(6)P(6)P(6)P(7) Financial institution P Golf course C C C Office, general PUD (11)C (10)PUD-TO P PUD-TO C Office, medical PUD (11)PUD-TO P PUD-TO C Personal or business service, principal use N-PUD (7) (11) P P (6) Pet Grooming P Photocopy & printing shops with accessory retail N-PUD (11) Private providers of public services, including vehicle storage and maintenance P Recreation facility, indoor N-PUD (11)C P C P C C C P (6) Recreation facility, outdoor N-PUD (11)C P C P C C Research facility or laboratory N-PUD (11) Restaurant, short order N-PUD (11)C Restaurant, standard N-PUD (11)C C Retail sales N-PUD (7) (11) P (7)C (6) Seasonal Mobile Food Unit P Service station C Waste transfer stations C APPENDIX C USES and DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS C-Non-Residential 3 South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective June 27, 2016 City Center FBC District NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS C1 R12 C1 R15 C1- AUTO C1-AIR C1-LR AR SW IO C2 IC AIR AIR-IND Residential Uses Single-family dwelling PUD P P P Two-family dwelling PUD P P Multi-family dwelling PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD Accessory residential units Group home or Residential Care Home PUD P P P Agricultural Uses Horticulture & forestry with on-premise sales Horticulture & forestry, no on-premise sales Keeping of livestock on 10 acres or more Single-family dwelling related to agriculture P P Additional dwellings for farm employees P P Public & Quasi-Public Uses Cemeteries Community center P P PUD P Congregate care, assisted living, or continuum of care facility C C C C C Cultural facility Educational facility PUD PUD C C C Educational support facilities PUD(5)PUD(5) Food Hub P(7)P(6)P(6)P(6)P(6)P(6)P(6)P(7)P(7)P(7) Funeral homes, mortuaries, and crematoriums C C C C C C C C C C Hospice P P P P P P Municipal facility P P P C C Parks Personal instruction facility P P P P P P P P P P P Place of worship P P P P P P P P P-ACC AirportCommercial 1 Other Commercial Heavy Commercial- Industrial Exempt from local regulation in all districts Permitted in all districts Please see Section 3.10 for regulations Conditional in all districts APPENDIX C USES and DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS C-Non-Residential 4 South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective June 27, 2016 City Center FBC District NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS C1 R12 C1 R15 C1- AUTO C1-AIR C1-LR AR SW IO C2 IC AIR AIR-IND AirportCommercial 1 Other Commercial Heavy Commercial- Industrial Recreation paths Skilled nursing facility C C C C C C Social services C C C C C C C Commercial & Industrial Uses Adult use Agriculture & construction equipment sales, service & rental P P Airport Uses P P Animal shelter C C P Artist production studio P P P P P Auto & motorcycle sales P P P Auto & motorcycle service & repair P P P Auto rental, with private accessory car wash & fueling P P P P P Bed & breakfast C C Cannabis dispensary (dispensing only)P P P P P P P-TO Cannabis dispensary (cultivation only)P P Car wash P Child care facility, licensed non-residential P P P P P P P P P P Commercial greenhouse PUD P P Commercial kennel, veterinary hospital and pet day care C C P P P P Commercial or public parking facility C C C C C C C C C Contractor or building trade facility P P P P Distribution and related storage, with >15% of GFA in office or other principal permitted use by same tenant C P P P Drive-through bank PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD Permitted in all districts See Article 8 APPENDIX C USES and DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS C-Non-Residential 5 South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective June 27, 2016 City Center FBC District NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS C1 R12 C1 R15 C1- AUTO C1-AIR C1-LR AR SW IO C2 IC AIR AIR-IND AirportCommercial 1 Other Commercial Heavy Commercial- Industrial Equipment service, repair & rental P P Family child care home, registered or licensed P P P P Financial institution P P P P P ACC P P Flight instruction P P P Hotel PUD PUD PUD C C C C Hotel, extended stay PUD PUD C C C C Indoor theater P P Indoor vehicle storage, maximum 10,000 square feet P-ACC Junk yard Light manufacturing PUD PUD P P P P Lumber and contractor’s yard P P P Manufacturing & assembly from previously prepared materials & components P P P P P PUD P P P P Mobile home, RV and boat sales, repair & service P P Motor freight terminal C P Office, general P P P P P P P PUD P P P Office, medical P P P P P P P PUD-TO P P-TO Personal or business service P P P P P(7)P P P (7)P P Pet grooming P P P P P P P P P Photocopy & printing shops, with accessory retail P P P P P P P P-ACC P P Printing & binding production facilities C P P P P Private providers of public services, including vehicle storage and maintenance P P P P Processing and storage P P P P P P Radio & television studio P P P C P P P APPENDIX C USES and DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS C-Non-Residential 6 South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective June 27, 2016 City Center FBC District NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS C1 R12 C1 R15 C1- AUTO C1-AIR C1-LR AR SW IO C2 IC AIR AIR-IND AirportCommercial 1 Other Commercial Heavy Commercial- Industrial Recreation facility, indoor P P P P P P P P-ACC P P Recreation facility, outdoor C C C C C C C C C Research facility or laboratory P P P P P P P P P P P Restaurant, short order P P P P P P-ACC P-ACC P-ACC P P-ACC P-ACC Restaurant, standard P P P P P P P P P-ACC Retail sales P (8)P P P(8)P (7)P (7)P (7)P (7) P (9)P (8)P-ACC Retail warehouse outlet P P Sale, rental & repair of aircraft & related parts P P Seasonal Mobile Food Unit P P P P P P P P P Self-storage P ACC, P- Non-TO Service station C C Shopping center C C Taverns, night clubs & private clubs P P P P P P P P Transportation services P P Warehousing & distribution C C P P Wholesale establishments C C P P P Key and Notes to the Table above: (1) For all IA District Uses please refer to Section 7.01, Institutional and Agricultural District. "N" refers to the Institutional-Agricultural North sub-district. (2) R7 and SEQ-VC as classified as non-residential zoning districts, but are included in this table for purposes of efficiency (3) No minimum lot size for bed & breakfast in the SEQ-VC district P = Permitted Non-TO = Allowable only outside of the Transit Overlay District C = Conditional Use PUD = Allowable within a Planned Unit Development ACC = Allowable as an accessory use TO = Allowable only in the Transit Overlay District (4) Permitted within a structure existing and approved for use as an 'educational facility' as of July 1, 2013. The structure existings as of July 1, 2013, may be expanded, APPENDIX C USES and DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS C-Non-Residential 7 South Burlington Land Development Regulations Effective June 27, 2016 City Center FBC District NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS C1 R12 C1 R15 C1- AUTO C1-AIR C1-LR AR SW IO C2 IC AIR AIR-IND AirportCommercial 1 Other Commercial Heavy Commercial- Industrial (5) Educational support facilities in C1 are subject to the dimensional standards of the IA-North District. See Article 7. (12) Allowable only as a municipally-operated facility. (11) Use is allowed only as an Educational Support Facility. See Section 7.01(E) (7) Use is limited to 5,000 SF GFA per tenant with a maximum 15,000 SF GFA total footprint for the building. Tenants shall have separate entries from one another and no direct passageways from one to another. (8) Use is limited to 15,000 SF GFA per tenant with a maximum 25,000 SF GFA total footprint for the building. Tenants shall have separate entries from one another and no direct passageways from one to another. (9) Use is limited to 30,000 SF GFA per tenant with a maximum 30,000 SF GFA total footprint for the building. Tenants shall have separate entries from one another and no direct passageways from one to another. (6) Use is limited to 3,000 SF GFA per tenant with a maximum 9,000 SF GFA total footprint for the building. Tenants shall have separate entries from one another and no direct passageways from one to another. (10) Use is restricted to not-for-profit organization whose primary purpose is the provision of educational or research services related to agriculture, horticulture, forestry, natural resource preservation, arts or recreation Appendix G Bicycle Parking Examples Acceptable Not Acceptable INVERTED U SERIES/CORRAL Post & Ring INVERTED U Bike lockers Vertical Two-Tier Graphics used with permission. Credit: AssociaƟon of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals, EssenƟals of Bike Parking, 2015 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY OF BURLINGTONDRDORSET ST SHERRY RDGARDEN STHINESBURG RDCOTTAGEGROVEAVE Commercial BoulevardGarden StreetSee 11.02(C)(1)Support StreetMarket StreetSee 11.02(C)(1)NeighborhoodStreet NarrowWHITE STPATCHEN RD WILLISTONRDPROUTY PKWYPINE STPINETREETERRDEANESTHOPKINS ST HELEN AV SHEPARDLNLILACLNHEATHSTMIDAS DR SUNSET AVWOODLANDPLEXECUTIVEMARY STMARKET STGILBERT STMYERS CT CHARLES ST IBYSTSPEAR ST ELSOM PKWY BARRETT STHAYDEN PKWY INTERSTATE89 OBRIEN DR S LO C UM ST SAN REMO DR EAST TERRNeighborhood StreetSupportStreetNeighborhood/Support StreetSupportStreetNeighborhoodStreetNeighborhood Street/Bike BoulevardCommercialBoulevardLegendExisting Road ParcelsPlanned Recreation PathPrimary Existing StreetsPrimary Planned StreetsSecondary Existing StreetsSecondary Planned StreetsPlanned Street Right of WayProposed City Center ZoningTransect ZonesT-1T-3T-3+T-4T-5Park/CivicEP:\Planning&Zoning\Zoning\FBC\FBC_PRim_SecRoads_BlockStndrd.mxd exported by:mbrumberg On 3/29/2017City Center Form Based Code - Primary & Secondary Streets & Block Standard ApplicabilityEffective Date: March 21, 2017DRAFT: March 29, 2017*Approximate locations of proposed roads, to be used for planning purposes only. Please refer to original studies for exact road centerlines.0 700 1,400350Feet Street Designation Label 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com South Burlington Planning Commission Proposed Land Development Regulations Amendment Report Approved by the Planning Commission May 9, 2017 In accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4441, the South Burlington Planning Commission has prepared the following report, approved April 11, 2017, regarding the proposed amendments to the City’s Land Development Regulations. Outline of the Proposed Overall Amendments The South Burlington Planning Commission held a public hearing Tuesday, May 9, 2017 at 7:00 pm in the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT. The Planning Commission held the hearing to consider the following amendments to the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: 1. End-of-Trip Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities (bike racks, bike storage, showers) ................................................... 2 2. Planned Rights of Way – Expansion of Williston Road and Addition of Market Street ........................................ 2 3. Affordable Housing Bonus in the SEQ (add SEQ-NRN subdistrict, clarify existing language) ............................... 3 4. Standards for determining applicability of required street connections & allowable cul-de-sacs ....................... 4 5. Remove redundant lists and clarify uses permitted in the Institutional-Agricultural district, Municipal District, Recreation & Parks District, and Residential 7-Neighborhood Commercial District ..................................................... 5 6. Allow Unclosed Front Porches top Extend into Principal Building Setback in the R4 District .............................. 6 7. Update Planning Commission, Development Review Board, and Advisory Committees authorization, powers, duties, and membership ................................................................................................................................................ 7 8. Remove Agricultural Uses Exempt by State Law, Create New Food Hub Use allowed in certain districts ........... 8 9. Replace planned street connection between Barrett Street and San Remo Drive with recreation path, add new planned dead-end street north from Barrett Street .............................................................................................. 8 10. Technical corrections, formatting and typos .................................................................................................. 11 Brief Description and Findings Concerning the Proposed Amendments The proposed amendments have been considered by the Planning Commission for their consistency with the text, goals, and objectives of the City of South Burlington’s Comprehensive Plan, adopted February 2, 2016. For each of the amendments, the Commission has addressed the following as enumerated under 24 VSA 4441(c): 2 “…The report shall provide a brief explanation of the proposed bylaw, amendment, or repeal and shall include a statement of purpose as required for notice under section 4444 of this title, and shall include findings regarding how the proposal: (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities.” 1. End-of-Trip Bicycle & Pedestrian Facilities (bike racks, bike storage, showers) Brief summary & Functional Change: The amendment would replace existing requirement for “a bicycle rack” at each non-residential and multi-family residential building with tiered requirements short-term bicycle parking spaces (ie, bike rack spaces), number of secure bicycle parking spaces (ie, indoor or enclosed), and showers. Also sets standards for the secure design of bike racks. Location of Amendments in the LDRs: Chapter 2, Definitions; Chapter 13.14 Supplemental Regulations; Appendix G. Analysis & Findings per 24 VSA 4441(c): (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing The City’s Comprehensive Plan sets a goal to “Develop a safe and efficient transportation system that supports pedestrian, bicycle, and transit options while accommodating the automobile” (p. 1-1), and includes objectives to “Reduce the percentage of trips taken by single-occupancy vehicles in the City” and “Seek alternative traffic congestion relief measures before existing roadway segments are expanded” (p. 2-66). The provision of these “end-of-trip” bicycle facilities will directly support the above-listed goals and objectives of the Plan. The amendments will also support the availability of safe and affordable housing by assuring that residents have places to keep bicycles and reduce dependence of vehicle ownership. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. The proposed amendments are not anticipated to affect future land uses or densities. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities. The proposed amendments are not anticipated to affect planned community facilities. 2. Planned Rights of Way – Expansion of Williston Road and Addition of Market Street 3 Brief summary & functional change: Revises the planned width of the two streets listed above based on the work of the Williston Road Network Study and Market Street design plans. Specifically, would require a slightly larger accommodation of future streets along Williston Road (100’ instead of 90’) and Market Street (80’). Location in the Land Development Regulations: Section 3.06, Table 3-1, Map: City Center Form Based Code – Primary and Secondary Streets & Block Standard Applicability Analysis & Findings per 24 VSA 4441(c): (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing The City’s Comprehensive Plan sets a goal to “Establish a city center with pedestrian- oriented design, mixed uses, and public buildings and civic spaces that act as a focal point to the community” (p. 1-1), and includes an objective to “Provide a transportation network that complies with Complete Streets mandates and maximizes efficiency and safety for all types of users (pedestrians, cyclists, transit, automobiles, trucks, rail, and air) (p. 2-66).” These slightly altered planned street rights-of-way will help to assure that all users can be comfortably and appropriately accommodated, especially in light of the City’s Form Based Codes standards which allow buildings to have a zero-foot setback from the right-of-way. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. The proposed planned right-of-way widths are closely in keeping with the planned future land uses and densities of the Comprehensive Plan’s Central District. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities. These amendments will aid in the completion of the planned transportation projects listed on pages 2-67 through 2-73. The streets in question have also been the subject of their own planning / design efforts which support these figures. 3. Affordable Housing Bonus in the SEQ (add SEQ-NRN subdistrict, clarify existing language) Brief Summary & functional change: Adds the SEQ-Neighborhood Residential North subdistrict to the list of zoning districts where a density bonus is allowed for affordability. Also clarifies that affordable units approved through density bonus do not require TDRs, and corrects section references. Location in the LDRs: 9.05(C) Analysis & Findings per 24 VSA 4441(c): (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing 4 The City’s Comprehensive Plan sets a goal to “Be affordable, with housing for people of all incomes, lifestyles, and stages of life” (p. 1-1), and includes a strategy to “Implement a variety of tools and programs to foster innovative approaches to preserving and increasing the City’s supply of affordable and moderate income housing. Potential tools should be explored and could income… transferable development rights… [and] bonuses and incentives.” (p.2-16). The proposal expands opportunities for safe and affordable housing in this part of the City. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. The proposed amendments consistent with the planned future land uses and densities of the Comprehensive Plan’s Southeast Quadrant District. The district calls for densities of between four and eight units per acre, using development rights. The total development potential in the SEQ-NRN district would remain below 8 units per acre, including all TDRs and affordable housing density bonuses. All market rate units above the standard (non- bonus) housing allowances would require TDRs. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities. The proposed amendments are not anticipated to affect planned community facilities. 4. Standards for determining applicability of required street connections & allowable cul-de-sacs Brief summary: This amendment would clarify how and when street connections should be required and when the southeast quadrant’s limits on dead-end street lengths are to be applied: • The relationship between two related standards in the SEQ: (1) that dead end streets shall not exceed 200’ in length, and (2) that street connections must be made to adjacent properties where the DRB finds it likely that such a connection would link to a future road / development; • Establish criteria for the DRB to determine whether a road connection is likely; • Establish criteria by which the DRB can determine that a right-of-way or phased connection is appropriate; and, • Affirm that where a connection is required, the applicant must build the connection or pay the full amount of such connection. Functional change: Clarity to DRB when these items come into contact with one another. Amendment would state that a street must connect where reasonably likely, and that any dead-end street NOT intended to connect to an adjacent property shall not exceed 200’ in length. Location in LDRs: 9.08(A)(2), 9.09(A)(1), 9.10(A)(2), 15.12(D)(4) Analysis & Findings per 24 VSA 4441(c): 5 (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing The City’s Comprehensive Plan sets a goal to “Develop a safe and efficient transportation system that supports pedestrian, bicycle, and transit options while accommodating the automobile” (p. 1-1). It also includes objectives to “connect neighborhoods with one another via road segments and with commercial areas for local, slow speed circulation” (p. 2-66), and to “provide a transportation network that is supportive of and integrated into the adjacent land uses and that is designed to minimize fragmentation of and adverse impacts to identified natural, cultural, scenic, and other open space resources” (p 2-66). The proposed amendments are intended to clarify responsibilities for road connections. Acknowledging that the installation of infrastructure is an element of the cost of developing housing, these amendments seek to assure that connections are made where they are in the long term interests of the community and discouraged where they are not. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. The proposed amendments are consistent with the proposed future land uses and densities spelled out in the plan. Specifically, the future land uses and transportation system are intended to be implemented in a complementary manner. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities. The proposed amendments include a provision specifying how planned future roadways should be incorporated into development where such planned features are shown on official city documents. 5. Remove redundant lists and clarify uses permitted in the Institutional- Agricultural district, Municipal District, Recreation & Parks District, and Residential 7-Neighborhood Commercial District Brief summary: would eliminate a duplication of permitted uses in these three zoning districts. Currently, the list of permitted / conditional uses in these three zoning districts are listed both in Article 7 (in text form) and in the Table of Uses. For all other districts, the text description of uses was eliminated many years ago. This amendment would remove the duplication and make clarifications where the duplicated uses were in conflict with one another. Functional change: Eliminates the lists of uses in Article 7, corrects the table of uses. Location in LDRs: Sections 4.06, 7.01, 7.02, 7.03, Appendix C Analysis & Findings per 24 VSA 4441(c): (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing 6 The proposed amendments do not involve significant policy changes; they are intended to remove redundant standards in the LDRs and, as necessary, clarify where two existing standards were not written with the same wording. The Comprehensive Plan includes an objective to “Conduct a comprehensive analysis pf City regulations relating to permitting with an eye toward ways to eliminate outdated or duplicative requirements and to further streamline the process of obtaining needed permits with a specific focus on improving the predictability of the process” (p. 2-22). The purposes of each district and goals of the Comprehensive Plan were used wherever a clarification was necessary. The proposed amendments are not expected to have an effect on the availability of safe and affordable housing. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. The proposed amendments consist of clarifications to existing standards. No significant changes to proposed future land uses or densities are proposed. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities. The proposed amendments consist of clarifications to existing standards. No changes affecting planned community facilities are proposed. 6. Allow Unclosed Front Porches top Extend into Principal Building Setback in the R4 District Brief summary: Per the Chamberlin Committee final report, would allow open air front porches to extend up to 12 feet in front of the principal building into the principal building setback. Any such porch would need to be open on three sides at a height of 40 inches and above. Functional change: Creates a reduced setback for porches, up to 10 feet from the front lot line, and clarifies that such porches within the front yard setback cannot be enclosed. Location in the LDRs: Section 2.02 (definitions for Porch, Open Porch, and Enclosed Porch), and Section 3.06(K). Analysis & Findings per 24 VSA 4441(c): (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing The proposed amendment would allow for front porches to be added to homes in the City’s largest residential zoning district. The City’s Comprehensive Plan sets goals for “Creating a robust sense of place and opportunity for our residents and visitors,” (p. 1-1) and to “Keep unique features, and maintain or enhance the quality of life of existing neighborhoods.” (p. 1-1) Further, the Plan includes an objective in its Quality of Life chapter to “Build and reinforce diverse, accessible neighborhoods that offer a good quality of life by designing and locating new and renovated development in a context-sensitive manner” (p 2-53). 7 By giving residents the opportunity to add front porches to their homes, it will help to enhance the sense of neighborhood and interaction between neighbors, and through this, help support overall safety in neighborhoods. The proposed amendment is not expected to affect the availability of affordable housing. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. As noted above, this amendment will implement the land use policies of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. It is not anticipated to impact densities. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities. No changes affecting planned community facilities are proposed. 7. Update Planning Commission, Development Review Board, and Advisory Committees authorization, powers, duties, and membership Brief summary: Eliminates language in the establishment of the Planning Commission, Development Review Board, and Design Review Committee that duplicates State Law, or is more appropriately City Council policy. Also names the Design Review Committee enactment to “advisory committees” to be consistent with State Statutes and current operations in South Burlington where other committees, such as the Bike Ped Committee and Recreation & Parks Committee, have a role in development review. Functional change: Simplifies language and eliminates text. Location in the LDRs: Sections 17.07, 17.08, 17.10 Analysis & Findings per 24 VSA 4441(c): (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing The proposed amendments are administrative in nature, clarifying roles of various boards referencing state statutes. The Comprehensive Plan includes an objective to “Conduct a comprehensive analysis pf City regulations relating to permitting with an eye toward ways to eliminate outdated or duplicative requirements and to further streamline the process of obtaining needed permits with a specific focus on improving the predictability of the process” (p. 2-22). The proposed amendments are anticipated to aid in the clarity of the review process for all types of development, including safe and affordable housing. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. The proposed amendments are not anticipated to have an effect on proposed future land uses or densities of the Plan. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities. 8 No changes affecting planned community facilities are proposed. 8. Remove Agricultural Uses Exempt by State Law, Create New Food Hub Use allowed in certain districts Brief summary: Amendments are predominantly related to food hub regulations and related definitions. Rooted in Sustainable Agriculture 2013 report and recommended by Sustainable Agriculture sub-committee of Planning Commission. Creates a new use category, food hub, which is a distributor of local food produced and/or made into value-added products from on and off-site locations. The amendments also remove text and standards where State statues limit local regulation of agricultural practices. Functional change: Changes to definitions; new additions and allowed use for food hub, removal of language where state law prohibits local regulation of certain agricultural & silviculatural practices. Location in the LDRs: Chapter 2 (Definitions); Chapter 13.27 (new); Table 13-3; Analysis & Findings per 24 VSA 4441(c): (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing The proposed amendments implement the Comprehensive Plan goal to “Support markets for local agricultural and food products,” (p. 1-1), objective to “enable, encourage, and incentivize agriculture and local food production dispersed throughout the City” (p. 2-119). The Plan also includes a strategy to “Facilitate local farmers’ ability to sell and process their products within the City and use the Land Development Regulations to incentivize urban agriculture and local food production in the City” (p. 2-119). The proposed amendments are not anticipated to affect the availability of safe and affordable housing. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. The proposed amendments are not anticipated to have an effect on proposed future land uses or densities of the Plan. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities. No changes affecting planned community facilities are proposed. 9. Replace planned street connection between Barrett Street and San Remo Drive with recreation path, add new planned dead-end street north from Barrett Street Brief summary: Would change the designation of the street connection between Barrett Street and San Remo Drive to a recreation “path”, with a planned ROW of 20 to 40 feet. Would also show a planned street extending north from Barrett Street as a dead-end, secondary street. 9 Functional change: Clarifies that a pedestrian connection is sought between this residential neighborhood and the Dorset Street corridor, would otherwise have been determined as part of development review; allows a dead end in the T3 district. Location in the LDRs: Map: City Center Form Based Code – Primary and Secondary Streets & Block Standard applicability. Analysis & Findings per 24 VSA 4441(c): (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing The proposed amendments further the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. They represent a carefully considered condition within the City where several competing elements of the Plan were evaluated in making this proposed amendment. The Barrett Street neighborhood consists of approximately 120 homes accessed from Hinesburg Road via Simpson Court and Barrett Street. To the south is the community’s high school / middle school complex, while to the north are the separately accessed Iby Street, the City-owned Dumont Park, and further to the north, Tributary 3 to the Potash Brook and its associated wetland complex. To the west are commercial & light industrial properties accessed from San Remo Drive, which itself is connected to Dorset Street in two places. A pedestrian connection exists at the southern end of the neighborhood to the middle school property. The City is in the process of a significant upgrade to Dumont Park, which will make it an attractive destination for travelers by foot from nearby areas. The Park is planned to connect, via pedestrian paths, to the neighborhood to the south and to Garden Street to the north. The Plan sets goals to: “Develop a safe and efficient transportation system that supports pedestrian, bicycle, and transit options while accommodating the automobile” (p. 1-1) and “Establish a city center with pedestrian-oriented design, mixed uses, and public buildings and civic spaces that act as a focal point to the community” (p. 1-1). The Plan includes several relevant objectives & strategies: • Objective 14: “Seek a livable balance between public, commercial, and civic activity and private tranquility and promote the health, peace, and well-being of residents in their daily lives” (p. 2-53). • Objective 18: “Connect neighborhoods with one another via road segments and with commercial areas for local, slow-speed circulation” (p. 2-66). • Objective 45: “Conserve and protect existing nearby residential areas” (p. 3-14). • Strategy 38: “Plan for safe pedestrian and bike access to all schools and support efforts to encourage more children to walk or bike to school” (p. 2-66). • Strategy 95: “Maintain Dorset Street and Williston Road as important transportation corridors for all users and reduce curb cuts” (p. 3-14). • Strategy 99: “Enhance Dumont Park within the City Center as a forested nature park that enhances and ecologically supports City Center Development, and provides green 10 space for passive recreation use, to include a linking, interconnected public path and trail network” (p. 3-14). • Strategy 100: “Designate a protected green belt along the length of Tributary 3 of the Potash Brook throughout City Center of sufficient area and width to restore, protect, and enhance water quality, stream channel and wetland functions, and adjoining riparian areas; to manage and treat additional urban runoff; and which accommodates compatible recreation use of the stream corridor, including planned public boardwalk crossings” (p. 3-15). The Plan also specifically discusses the subject of interconnected road networks and highlights that “South Burlington’s road network has a significant lack of east-west connections, as well as neighborhood and commercial district connections in general” (p. 2- 61), and that “While the importance of these roadway connections cannot be overstated, any new connection should be undertaken with great care” (p. 2-62). The presence of a high-volume commercial & commuter area immediately next to a neighborhood street network not designed to accommodate additional volume, together with the particular circumstances of the Dorset Street / Hinesburg Road / Kennedy Drive / Market Street super-block, are important considerations in this instance. It is the Commission’s assessment, based on the Comprehensive Plan, input from the City’s Department of Public Works, and following a public meeting, that it is appropriate for this connection to be a path and for the planned street to terminate. The proposed amendment is not anticipated to affect the availability of safe and affordable housing, though the allowance of a dead-end road may provide for a handful of additional homes to be able to be constructed in the vicinity as anticipated by the Plan and the remainder of the Form Based Code (Transect 3) district. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. As noted above, the proposed amendments are found to be consistent with the City’s Plan. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities. Under the current Land Development Regulations and Official Map, the planned connection is able to be either a road (carrying cars) or a pedestrian path (care prohibited). At present, a proposal for development in this area would include a recommendation from the applicant, and a determination from the Development Review Board. These amendments would provide additional clarity to landowners, residents, and the Development Review Board. The proposed amendments are found to be consistent with planned community facilities. 11 10. Technical corrections, formatting and typos Brief summaries: • Conditional Use Procedural clarification. Section 14.10 (D) describes two processes depending on the type of application. Minor wording changes to more clearly state when each process is to be followed. • Listing of SEQ-NRN District. Adds the SEQ-Neighborhood Residential North District to the list of zoning districts in the LDRs. • Parking in front of buildings in R7-NC. Removes a statement that “parking shall be placed to the side or rear of the structure if possible.” This language is no longer needed as the City’s Site Plan standards related to parking were revised several years ago and are more clear than this language. • Location Descriptions of C1-AUTO and C1-AIR districts. Removes the description of the location of these two districts. Other districts do not have such descriptions; they simply use the map. • SEQ-NRN dimensions. Adds the SEQ-NRN subdistrict to the table of Dimensions (with same standards as SEQ-NR, and with a note to refer back to Article 9 • Dimensional standards, C1-LR, AR, SW districts. Consolidates “retail” and “other non- residential uses”’ dimensional standards. They are identical, and so redundant. • Density in C1-Auto district. In the Table of Uses, the density in this zoning district is listed as “12 or 15” units per acre. In the text of the LDRs, it’s listed as 15 units per acre. To clarify this confusion, the table is corrected to simply read “15” units per acre. • Typographic correction in approval process. There is a missing word in the process for receipt of an extension to a development review approval. Functional change: No significant functional changes, only clarifications. Location in the LDRs: 3.01 (A)(1), 4.06 (E)(3), 5.02(C), 5.03(C), 17.04(B)(1), Table C-2 Analysis & Findings per 24 VSA 4441(c): (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing The proposed amendments are technical in nature. The Comprehensive Plan includes an objective to “Conduct a comprehensive analysis pf City regulations relating to permitting with an eye toward ways to eliminate outdated or duplicative requirements and to further streamline the process of obtaining needed permits with a specific focus on improving the predictability of the process” (p. 2-22). The proposed amendments are anticipated to aid in the clarity of the review process for all types of development, including safe and affordable housing. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. 12 The proposed amendments are not anticipated to have an effect on proposed future land uses or densities of the Plan. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities. No changes affecting planned community facilities are proposed. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTONCITY OF BURLINGTONBlock StandardsAppicability Non-Exempt INTERSTATE 89W H IT E S T DORSET STHINESBURG RDA S P E N D R R U T H S T G A R D E N S T PATCHEN RDMIDAS DRMARY STM A R K E T S T WILLISTON RD I B Y S T SAN REMO DRLegend Form Based Code Area (346 acres) Existing Road Parcels Existing Streets Planned Streets Planned Recreation Path Planned Street Right of Way Parks Tax Parcel Boundary E P:\Planning&Zoning\Planning\OfficialMap\OfficialMap2016\OfficialMap_2016.mxd exported by:mbrumberg On 3/29/2017 City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning - Official Map (Form Based Code Area) Effective March 21, 2017 DRAFT: March 29, 2017 *Approximate locations of proposed roads, to be used for planning purposes only. Please refer to original studies for exact road centerlines. 0 700 1,400350 Feet 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com South Burlington Planning Commission Proposed Official Map Amendment Report Approved by the Planning Commission May 9, 2017 In accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4441, the South Burlington Planning Commission has prepared the following report regarding the proposed amendments to the City’s Official Map. The South Burlington Planning Commission held a public hearing on Tuesday, May 9th at 7:00 pm in the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT to consider the amendments to the South Burlington Official Map discussed below. The proposed amendments to the Official Map consist of the following changes, all located within the “City Center” area, generally consisting of land in the vicinity of and in between Williston Road, Dorset Street, and Hinesburg Road. The amendments include two principal elements: • Planned Right-of-Way – Market Street • Planned Streets & Connections The proposed amendments have been considered by the Planning Commission for their consistency with the text, goals, and objectives of the City of South Burlington’s Comprehensive Plan, adopted February 2, 2016. For each of the amendments, the Commission has addressed the following as enumerated under 24 VSA 4441(c): “…The report shall provide a brief explanation of the proposed bylaw, amendment, or repeal and shall include a statement of purpose as required for notice under section 4444 of this title, and shall include findings regarding how the proposal: (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities.” 1. Planned Right of Way – Market Street 2 Brief summary & functional change: Establishes a planned right-of-way along Market Street demarcation on the Official Map to complement proposed amendments to the Land Development Regulations. Analysis & Findings per 24 VSA 4441(c): (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing The City’s Comprehensive Plan sets a goal to “Establish a city center with pedestrian-oriented design, mixed uses, and public buildings and civic spaces that act as a focal point to the community” (p. 1-1), and includes an objective to “Provide a transportation network that complies with Complete Streets mandates and maximizes efficiency and safety for all types of users (pedestrians, cyclists, transit, automobiles, trucks, rail, and air) (p. 2-66).” These slightly altered planned street rights-of-way will help to assure that all users can be comfortably and appropriately accommodated, especially in light of the City’s Form Based Codes standards which allow buildings to have a zero-foot setback from the right-of-way. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. The proposed planned right-of-way widths are closely in keeping with the planned future land uses and densities of the Comprehensive Plan’s Central District. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities. These amendments will aid in the completion of the planned transportation projects listed on pages 2-67 through 2-73. The streets in question have also been the subject of their own planning / design efforts which support these figures. 2. Street connections in T3 – Barrett Street to San Remo Drive Brief summary: Would change the designation of the street connection between Barrett Street and San Remo Drive to a recreation “path”. Would also add a planned street extending north from Barrett Street. Functional change: Clarifies that a pedestrian connection is sought between this residential neighborhood and the Dorset Street corridor, would otherwise have been determined as part of development review; allows a dead end in the T3 district. Analysis & Findings per 24 VSA 4441(c): (1) Conforms with or furthers the goals and policies contained in the municipal plan, including the effect of the proposal on the availability of safe and affordable housing The proposed amendments further the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. They represent a carefully considered condition within the City where several competing elements of the Plan were evaluated in making this proposed amendment. 3 The Barrett Street neighborhood consists of approximately 120 homes accessed from Hinesburg Road via Simpson Court and Barrett Street. To the south is the community’s high school / middle school complex, while to the north are the separately accessed Iby Street, the City-owned Dumont Park, and further to the north, Tributary 3 to the Potash Brook and its associated wetland complex. To the west are commercial & light industrial properties accessed from San Remo Drive, which itself is connected to Dorset Street in two places. A pedestrian connection exists at the southern end of the neighborhood to the middle school property. The City is in the process of a significant upgrade to Dumont Park, which will make it an attractive destination for travelers by foot from nearby areas. The Park is planned to connect, via pedestrian paths, to the neighborhood to the south and to Garden Street to the north. The Plan sets goals to: “Develop a safe and efficient transportation system that supports pedestrian, bicycle, and transit options while accommodating the automobile” (p. 1-1) and “Establish a city center with pedestrian-oriented design, mixed uses, and public buildings and civic spaces that act as a focal point to the community” (p. 1-1). The Plan includes several relevant objectives & strategies: • Objective 14: “Seek a livable balance between public, commercial, and civic activity and private tranquility and promote the health, peace, and well-being of residents in their daily lives” (p. 2-53). • Objective 18: “Connect neighborhoods with one another via road segments and with commercial areas for local, slow-speed circulation” (p. 2-66). • Objective 45: “Conserve and protect existing nearby residential areas” (p. 3-14). • Strategy 38: “Plan for safe pedestrian and bike access to all schools and support efforts to encourage more children to walk or bike to school” (p. 2-66). • Strategy 95: “Maintain Dorset Street and Williston Road as important transportation corridors for all users and reduce curb cuts” (p. 3-14). • Strategy 99: “Enhance Dumont Park within the City Center as a forested nature park that enhances and ecologically supports City Center Development, and provides green space for passive recreation use, to include a linking, interconnected public path and trail network” (p. 3-14). • Strategy 100: “Designate a protected green belt along the length of Tributary 3 of the Potash Brook throughout City Center of sufficient area and width to restore, protect, and enhance water quality, stream channel and wetland functions, and adjoining riparian areas; to manage and treat additional urban runoff; and which accommodates compatible recreation use of the stream corridor, including planned public boardwalk crossings” (p. 3-15). The Plan also specifically discusses the subject of interconnected road networks and highlights that “South Burlington’s road network has a significant lack of east-west connections, as well as neighborhood and commercial district connections in general” (p. 2- 61), and that “While the importance of these roadway connections cannot be overstated, any new connection should be undertaken with great care” (p. 2-62). 4 The presence of a high-volume commercial & commuter area immediately next to a neighborhood street network not designed to accommodate additional volume, together with the particular circumstances of the Dorset Street / Hinesburg Road / Kennedy Drive / Market Street super-block, are important considerations in this instance. It is the Commission’s assessment, based on the Comprehensive Plan, input from the City’s Department of Public Works, and following a public meeting, that it is appropriate for this connection to be a path and for the planned street to terminate. The proposed amendment is not anticipated to affect the availability of safe and affordable housing, though the allowance of a dead-end road may provide for a handful of additional homes to be able to be constructed in the vicinity as anticipated by the Plan and the remainder of the Form Based Code (Transect 3) district. (2) Is compatible with the proposed future land uses and densities of the municipal plan. As noted above, the proposed amendments are found to be consistent with the City’s Plan. (3) Carries out, as applicable, any specific proposals for any planned community facilities. Under the current Land Development Regulations and Official Map, the planned connection is able to be either a road (carrying cars) or a pedestrian path (cars prohibited). At present, a proposal for development in this area would include a recommendation from the applicant, and a determination from the Development Review Board. These amendments would provide additional clarity to landowners, residents, and the Development Review Board. The proposed amendments are found to be consistent with planned community facilities. CITY COUNCIL MAJOR ISSUES WORK PLAN COUNCIL ACTION 1 = First Council meeting of month STAFF ACTION 2 = Second Council meeting of month COMMITTEE WORK X - Project completePUBLIC VOTES T-Project terminated D - Project Delayed COUNCIL PRIORITY STAFF ASSIGNED COMMITTEE ASS MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MARCH (17) FY 2019 BUDGET DEVELOPMENT Prep Council for discusion on budget priotities Tom/Kevin 1 Council Budget Guidance Tom/Kevin 2 Mgr. Preparation and Init. Review Tom 1 2 1 2 Final Review with managers Tom/Kevin 1 2 1 Council draft Tom 2 Public presentation/ adoption by Council Tom 1 Public input on budget 1 Steering Committee Tom 2 Pre-Town meeting presentation Tom 1 City vote 1 CIP DEVELOPMENT Solicit Committee recommendations Ilona/Martha 2 1 Staff Formulation/Dept. recommendations Ilona/Martha 1 2 1 2 Management recommendation Tom/Kevin 2 CIP Public hearing Tom 1 Presentatioin to Council/initial approval Tom 1 Final Approval 1 HRIP DEVELOPMENT Staff formation and review Tom/Kevin 1 2 Management recommendation Tom/Kevin 1 Presentation to Council/Public input Tom 2 Bike and Ped Coordinater - DPW Approval by Council Tom 1 Final Approval 1 COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS Input from Committee Chairs Confirm Committee Structure/membership Kevin 1 Advertise for Opennings Celine 2 1 2 Interview Candidates Kevin 2 1 2 Make Appointments 2 Notify New Members Celine 1 Certificates to Retirees Celine 1 Consider Community & Econ Dev Committee Consider adding students to Committees FINANCIAL ISSUES Monthly Financial Reports Tom/Sue 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Department narratives Managers/Tom/Sue 2 2 2 Finalize tax rate/payment dates Tom/Sue 1 Presentation of draft audit Ron/Sue 2 2 Presentation by actuary Tom/Janice 2 2 Presentation by pension fund manager Tom/Sue/Janice 2 2 CITY CENTER Update for Council Kevin/Ilona 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CREATIVE ARTS CENTER Feasibility Study undertaken Kevin/Various Staff 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Feasibility Study Report to Council Kevin 1 Discuss local option tax financing CITY LIBRARY CITY COUNCIL MAJOR ISSUES WORK PLAN Reports to Council from Library Board Jennifer 1 1 1 1 Address Library Board role in fundraising Authorize expenditures for site control Tom/Ilona 2 Approve library design contract Jennifer/Ilona 2 Present TIF/Bond March ballot item Ilona/Andrew 2 Approve TIF/Bond March ballot item Ilona/Andrew 1 Voter consideration of Library ballot item 1 CITY HALL Staff develops recommendation Council review and decision on TIF vote Prepare public information on TIF vote RECREATION FACILITY Staff develops recommendation Council review and decision on TIF vote Prepare public information on TIF vote TIF DISTRICT SUBSTANTIAL CHANGE Staff presentation of proposed changes 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Public Hearing Ilona 2 Council approval of Change 2 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT Staff presents process Ilona 2 Public outreach and policY development Ilona Staff presents policy options Ilona 1 Public input and Council discussion 2 Council approval of plan 2 OTHER COUNCIL PRIORITIES FOR CITY CENTER Incentives for business to locate in CC Outreach for Library Outreach for Performing Arts Center Outreach to Chamber of Commerce AIRPORT RELATED ISSUES Regionalized Airport Governannce Meet with FAA representative Follow-up Council to Council meeting MOU regarding future demolition OPEN SPACE ISSUES WHEELER CONSERVATION EASEMENT Presentation to Council/Public Input Paul/Cathy/consultant Joiint Committee 1 Council discussion and possible approval Paul/Cathy/consultant Joint Committee 2 TRANSPORTATION ISSUES 21st Century bus stop Bike path/facility improvements Visibility/Marketing of public transit ORDINANCE UPDATE PROJECT PARKING Draft previewed w/Council for discussion Andrew 2 1st reading and Council discussion Andrew 1 2nd reading, public hearing, pos. adoption Andrew 1 MOTOR VEHICLES Draft previewed w/Council for discussion Andrew 2 1st reading and Council discussion Andrew 1 2nd reading, public hearing, pos. adoption Andrew 1 CITY COUNCIL MAJOR ISSUES WORK PLAN POORLY MAINTAINED PROPERTIES Draft previewed w/Council for discussion Andrew 1st reading and Council discussion Andrew 2nd reading, public hearing, pos. adoption Andrew ABANDONED PROPERTIES Draft previewed w/Council for discussion Andrew 1st reading and Council discussion Andrew 2nd reading, public hearing, pos. adoption Andrew RENTAL PROPERTY Regis/INSPECTIONS Draft previewed w/Council for discussion Andrew 1st reading and Council discussion Andrew 2nd reading, public hearing, pos. adoption Andrew BUILDING CODES Draft previewed w/Council for discussion Andrew 1st reading and Council discussion Andrew 2nd reading, public hearing, pos. adoption Andrew GENERAL ORDINANCE UPDATE Andrew NEIGHBORHOODS CONSOLIDATED COLLECTION OF TRASH EXPLORE NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING ASSOC COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PLAN City Website Development Coralee/Consultant Council/Public input - beta version Launch OTHER COUNCIL COMMUNICATION PRIORITIES Committee member bios (website) Scheduling/community Calendar (website) Digital suggestion box (website) Front Porch Forum posting policies MISC. PROPERTY TAX MAILER Provide ideas for text Kevin 2 Write text Kevin 2 Approve text Kevin 1 OTHER COUNCIL MISC. PRIORITIES Develop Lean Process review strategy Heroin addiction outreach and education Electrical upgrades at Dorset Park More meetings outside of City Hall Indoor Pool Feasibility Task Force NC Non-Essential Travel Policy Focus on Affordable Housing Regular updates on police training Revenue Report-April, 2017 General Fund Estimated Received % Budget FY 2017 Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-April Total PROPERTY TAX REVENUE $14,106,642.00 ($13,627,315.82)96.60%$479,326.18 ($29,263.62) Total LOCAL OPTION TAXES $3,665,276.49 ($2,302,550.66)62.82%$1,362,725.83 $0.00 Total TAX REVENUE $17,771,918.49 ($15,929,866.48)89.64%$1,842,052.01 ($29,263.62) Total INTEREST/PENALTY ON TAX $267,500.00 ($75,014.21)28.04%$192,485.79 ($2,896.58) Total CITY MANAGER $453,885.26 ($407,410.74)89.76%$46,474.52 ($978.36) Total CITY CLERK $252,300.00 ($165,196.02)65.48%$87,103.98 ($16,411.54) Total PLANNING & ZONING $349,200.00 ($205,529.15)58.86%$143,670.85 ($25,759.86) Total FIRE DEPARTMENT $479,000.00 ($2,037,927.04)425.45%($1,558,927.04)($17,486.60) Total ELECTRICAL INSPECTION $75,000.00 ($20,476.00)27.30%$54,524.00 ($2,105.00) Total AMBULANCE $738,000.00 ($686,134.50)92.97%$51,865.50 ($49,091.32) Total POLICE DEPARTMENT $526,969.34 ($216,637.66)41.11%$310,331.68 ($44,570.67) Total PUBLIC SAFETY $1,818,969.34 ($2,961,175.20)162.79%($1,142,205.86)($113,253.59) Total HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT $1,181,000.00 ($1,006,137.43)85.19%$174,862.57 ($63,132.40) Total RED ROCKS PARK $61,500.00 ($65,087.00)105.83%($3,587.00)$0.00 Total FACILITIES $1,000.00 ($40.00)4.00%$960.00 $0.00 Total SPECIAL ACTIVITIES $770,536.00 ($113,430.75)14.72%$657,105.25 ($3,027.50) Total RECREATION $833,036.00 ($178,557.75)21.43%$654,478.25 ($3,027.50) Total COMMUNITY LIBRARY $6,800.00 ($7,346.35)108.03%($546.35)($697.22) Total GENERAL FUND $22,934,609.09 ($20,936,233.33)91.29%$1,998,375.76 ($255,420.67) Revenue Report-April, 2017 General Fund Estimated Received % Budget FY 2017 MTD Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-April TAX REVENUE Tax, Current Budget $13,995,642.00 ($13,404,242.60)95.77%$591,399.40 ($29,263.62) VT Payment in Lieu of Tax $40,000.00 ($158,456.22)396.14%($118,456.22)$0.00 Taxes, Reappraisal/ACT 60 $71,000.00 ($64,617.00)91.01%$6,383.00 $0.00 Total TAX REVENUE $14,106,642.00 ($13,627,315.82)96.60%$479,326.18 ($29,263.62) LOCAL OPTION TAXES Local Option Tax-Sales $2,695,571.69 ($1,675,041.65)62.14%$1,020,530.04 $0.00 Local Option Tax-Rooms/Me $969,704.80 ($627,509.01)64.71%$342,195.79 $0.00 Total LOCAL OPTION TAXES $3,665,276.49 ($2,302,550.66)62.82%$1,362,725.83 $0.00 Total TAX REVENUE $17,771,918.49 ($15,929,866.48)89.64%$1,842,052.01 ($29,263.62) INTEREST/PENALTY ON TAX Penalty, Current & Prior $125,000.00 ($106,820.24)85.46%$18,179.76 $512.03 Interest, Current & Prior $35,000.00 ($37,964.93)108.47%($2,964.93)($3,408.61) Abatements/Write-offs $0.00 $70,562.57 100.00%$70,562.57 $0.00 Attorney Fees $2,500.00 ($791.61)31.66%$1,708.39 $0.00 Fee to Collect State Educ $90,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$90,000.00 $0.00 Current Use $15,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$15,000.00 $0.00 Total INTEREST/PENALTY ON TAX $267,500.00 ($75,014.21)28.04%$192,485.79 ($2,896.58) CITY MANAGER Administrative Services-W $57,500.00 ($57,500.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Estimated Received % Budget FY 2017 MTD Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-April Administrative Services-S $134,391.55 ($134,391.55)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Administrative Services-W $150,335.71 ($150,335.71)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 From Sewer-Audit & Actuar $6,214.00 ($6,214.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 From SW-Audit & Actuary $3,555.00 ($3,555.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Pension Liab Note-WPC $38,675.00 $0.00 0.00%$38,675.00 $0.00 Pension Liab Note-SW $26,510.00 $0.00 0.00%$26,510.00 $0.00 From Water-Audit $2,100.00 ($2,100.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Admin Svc Fee Fund 240 $31,424.00 ($31,424.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 From WPC-Payroll, Testing $700.00 ($700.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 From SW-Payroll, Testing $480.00 ($480.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Solar Credits $0.00 ($9,168.18)100.00%($9,168.18)($978.36) Insurance Reimbursement $0.00 ($11,475.61)100.00%($11,475.61)$0.00 Miscellaneous $2,000.00 ($66.69)3.33%$1,933.31 $0.00 Total CITY MANAGER $453,885.26 ($407,410.74)89.76%$46,474.52 ($978.36) CITY CLERK Recording Fees $155,000.00 ($91,412.00)58.98%$63,588.00 ($8,000.00) Photocopy Fees $28,000.00 ($20,282.60)72.44%$7,717.40 ($1,822.48) Photocopies-Vital Records $5,000.00 ($4,329.00)86.58%$671.00 ($216.00) Pet Licenses $25,000.00 ($20,389.28)81.56%$4,610.72 ($3,364.00) Pet Control Fees $5,000.00 ($1,201.00)24.02%$3,799.00 ($726.00) Beverage/Cabaret License $8,000.00 ($8,265.00)103.31%($265.00)($185.00) Entertainment Permits $1,000.00 ($125.00)12.50%$875.00 $0.00 Marriage Licenses $1,500.00 ($1,120.00)74.67%$380.00 ($50.00) Green Mountain Passports $300.00 ($158.00)52.67%$142.00 ($6.00) Motor Vehicle Renewals $1,000.00 ($534.00)53.40%$466.00 ($57.00) School Reimburse-Election $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,500.00 $0.00 Interest on Investments $21,000.00 ($17,380.14)82.76%$3,619.86 ($1,985.06) Total CITY CLERK $252,300.00 ($165,196.02)65.48%$87,103.98 ($16,411.54) Estimated Received % Budget FY 2017 MTD Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-April PLANNING Building & Sign Permits $250,000.00 ($118,782.47)47.51%$131,217.53 ($14,889.06) Bianchi Ruling $8,000.00 ($9,110.00)113.88%($1,110.00)($1,065.00) Zoning and Planning $87,500.00 ($75,126.68)85.86%$12,373.32 ($9,395.80) Sewer Inspection Fees $2,500.00 ($1,800.00)72.00%$700.00 ($250.00) Peddlers' Permits $1,200.00 ($710.00)59.17%$490.00 ($160.00) Total PLANNING $349,200.00 ($205,529.15)58.86%$143,670.85 ($25,759.86) FIRE DEPARTMENT Outside Employment $4,000.00 ($168.50)4.21%$3,831.50 $0.00 Fire Inspection Revenue $475,000.00 ($137,758.54)29.00%$337,241.46 ($17,486.60) Loan Proceeds $0.00 ($1,900,000.00)100.00%($1,900,000.00)$0.00 Total FIRE DEPARTMENT $479,000.00 ($2,037,927.04)425.45%($1,558,927.04)($17,486.60) ELECTRICAL INSPECTION Electrical Inspection-Rev $75,000.00 ($20,476.00)27.30%$54,524.00 ($2,105.00) Total ELECTRICAL INSPECTION $75,000.00 ($20,476.00)27.30%$54,524.00 ($2,105.00) AMBULANCE Tax Revenues $155,000.00 ($155,000.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Ambulance Service Billing $565,000.00 ($516,328.44)91.39%$48,671.56 ($47,194.27) Grand Isle Billing $6,000.00 ($4,081.06)68.02%$1,918.94 ($247.05) Miscellaneous Income $12,000.00 ($10,725.00)89.38%$1,275.00 ($1,650.00) Total AMBULANCE $738,000.00 ($686,134.50)92.97%$51,865.50 ($49,091.32) POLICE DEPARTMENT Estimated Received % Budget FY 2017 MTD Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-April Vermont District Court $70,000.00 ($24,525.00)35.04%$45,475.00 ($5,463.00) Traffic Safety Grant $7,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$7,500.00 $0.00 Sale of Cruisers/Bequest $3,000.00 ($3,330.00)111.00%($330.00)$0.00 Police Reports $7,500.00 ($5,824.35)77.66%$1,675.65 ($435.00) I.C.A.C.$0.00 ($2,199.94)100.00%($2,199.94)($358.67) SHARP $0.00 ($19,930.63)100.00%($19,930.63)($10,576.49) Drug Task Force Grant $94,000.00 ($45,085.99)47.96%$48,914.01 ($8,509.16) Parking Tickets $0.00 ($75.00)100.00%($75.00)($6,761.13) Alarm Registrations $10,000.00 ($4,275.00)42.75%$5,725.00 ($1,470.00) Alarm Fines $3,000.00 ($100.00)3.33%$2,900.00 $0.00 Off Duty Police $30,000.00 ($3,313.88)11.05%$26,686.12 ($459.94) Bullet Proof Vest Grant $3,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,500.00 $0.00 COPS Grant $85,000.00 ($14,000.00)16.47%$71,000.00 $0.00 Police Impact Fees $110,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$110,000.00 $0.00 3rd Floor Lease Revenue $103,469.34 ($76,301.01)73.74%$27,168.33 ($8,477.89) Solar Credits $0.00 ($4,881.23)100.00%($4,881.23)($1,999.39) Miscellaneous - Police $0.00 ($12,795.63)100.00%($12,795.63)($60.00) Total POLICE DEPARTMENT $526,969.34 ($216,637.66)41.11%$310,331.68 ($44,570.67) HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Road Opening Permits $120,000.00 ($59,995.00)50.00%$60,005.00 ($2,930.00) Overweight truck permits $1,700.00 ($1,570.00)92.35%$130.00 ($515.00) Highway State Aid $222,000.00 ($224,529.13)101.14%($2,529.13)($48,730.32) Fuel Pump Surcharge $5,800.00 ($4,750.76)81.91%$1,049.24 ($461.97) HazMat Facility Lease $26,000.00 ($21,517.78)82.76%$4,482.22 $0.00 School Bus Parts Reimbure $32,500.00 ($35,194.76)108.29%($2,694.76)($587.03) School gas/diesel reimbur $175,000.00 ($74,982.81)42.85%$100,017.19 ($6,968.58) School vehicle repair pay $19,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$19,000.00 $0.00 Salary Reimbursement-WPC $269,000.00 ($269,000.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 FICA Reimbursement-WPC $22,000.00 ($22,000.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Estimated Received % Budget FY 2017 MTD Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-April Pension Reimbursement-WPC $82,000.00 ($82,000.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Benefits Reimbursement-WP $75,000.00 ($75,000.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Salary Reimbursement-SW $18,000.00 ($18,000.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Benefits Reimbursement-SW $10,000.00 ($10,000.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Reimburse from Fund 265 $8,000.00 ($8,000.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Highway Impact Fee-RT 2 $75,000.00 ($75,000.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Hgwy Misc Revenue $20,000.00 ($24,597.19)122.99%($4,597.19)($2,939.50) Total HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT $1,181,000.00 ($1,006,137.43)85.19%$174,862.57 ($63,132.40) RECREATION RED ROCKS PARK Red Rocks Gate Receipts $6,500.00 ($10,087.00)155.18%($3,587.00)$0.00 From Fund 240 $55,000.00 ($55,000.00)100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Total RED ROCKS PARK $61,500.00 ($65,087.00)105.83%($3,587.00)$0.00 FACILITIES J/C Park Rentals $1,000.00 ($40.00)4.00%$960.00 $0.00 Total FACILITIES $1,000.00 ($40.00)4.00%$960.00 $0.00 SPECIAL ACTIVITIES Great Escape Ticket Sales $17,500.00 ($8,448.00)48.27%$9,052.00 $0.00 Youth Programs $116,000.00 ($82,752.25)71.34%$33,247.75 ($1,858.50) Adult Evening Classes $43,000.00 ($19,730.50)45.88%$23,269.50 ($1,169.00) City Fest $0.00 ($2,500.00)100.00%($2,500.00)$0.00 Recreation Impact Fees $194,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$194,500.00 $0.00 Hinesburg Road Grant $39,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$39,000.00 $0.00 Debt Proceeds $212,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$212,000.00 $0.00 Xfer In-Fund 309 $148,536.00 $0.00 0.00%$148,536.00 $0.00 Estimated Received % Budget FY 2017 MTD Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-April Total SPECIAL ACTIVITIES $770,536.00 ($113,430.75)14.72%$657,105.25 ($3,027.50) Total RECREATION $833,036.00 ($178,557.75)21.43%$654,478.25 ($3,027.50) COMMUNITY LIBRARY Grants $0.00 ($142.50)100.00%($142.50)$0.00 Library Lost Books $0.00 ($833.45)100.00%($833.45)($55.82) Fines and Fees $3,800.00 ($4,038.00)106.26%($238.00)($346.00) Non-Resident Fees $700.00 ($550.00)78.57%$150.00 ($40.00) Libriary Copies and Print $1,800.00 ($1,782.40)99.02%$17.60 ($255.40) Bookmobile Donations $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00 Total COMMUNITY LIBRARY $6,800.00 ($7,346.35)108.03%($546.35)($697.22) Total GENERAL FUND $22,934,609.09 ($20,936,233.33)91.29%$1,998,375.76 ($255,420.67) Total All Funds $22,934,609.09 ($20,936,233.33)91.29%$1,998,375.76 ($255,420.67) Revenue Report-April, 2017 Sewer Fund Estimated Received % Budget FY 2017 MTD Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-April WATER POLLUTION CONTROL CHARGES FOR SERVICES W.P.C. User Fees $3,421,385.21 ($2,153,512.76)62.94%$1,267,872.45 ($274,862.69) W.P.C. Truck Charges $25,000.00 ($25,514.00)102.06%($514.00)($6,278.00) Connection Fees $200,000.00 ($122,937.10)61.47%$77,062.90 ($7,388.79) Enviromental Impact $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$10,000.00 $0.00 Total CHARGES FOR SERVICES $3,656,385.21 ($2,301,963.86)62.96%$1,354,421.35 ($288,529.48) BOND AND LOAN PROCEEDS Colchester A/P Pkwy Pmt $742,310.00 $0.00 0.00%$742,310.00 $0.00 GF Note Repay-Solar $166,000.00 ($12,004.00)7.23%$153,996.00 $0.00 Total BOND AND LOAN PROCEEDS $908,310.00 ($12,004.00)1.32%$896,306.00 $0.00 MISCELLANEOUS Miscellaneous Rev.-W.P.C.$2,000.00 ($44,225.04)2211.25%($42,225.04)($143.72) Total MISCELLANEOUS $2,000.00 ($44,225.04)2211.25%($42,225.04)($143.72) Total OPERATING TRANSFERS IN $4,566,695.21 ($2,358,192.90)51.64%$2,208,502.31 ($288,673.20) Total ENTERPRISE FUND/W.P.C.$4,566,695.21 ($2,358,192.90)51.64%$2,208,502.31 ($288,673.20) Total All Funds $4,566,695.21 ($2,358,192.90)51.64%$2,208,502.31 ($288,673.20) Revenue Report-April, 2017 Stormwater Fund Estimated Received % Budget FY 2017 MTD Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-April S/WATER UTILITIES REVENUE Intergovernmental Revenue $0.00 ($24,758.54)100.00%($24,758.54)($2,456.71) S/W User Fees - Water Bil $2,133,412.09 ($1,430,683.68)67.06%$702,728.41 ($192,164.04) Credit Application Fees $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00 Systems Takeover App Fees $0.00 ($500.00)100.00%($500.00)$0.00 Payment from GF re: GIS $38,000.00 ($6,500.00)17.11%$31,500.00 $0.00 State of VT Fee for Servi $50,000.00 ($3,198.75)6.40%$46,801.25 $0.00 SW Grants $0.00 ($12,043.00)100.00%($12,043.00)$0.00 Stormwater Miscellaneous $0.00 ($25.00)100.00%($25.00)$0.00 Reserve Transfer In $407,972.65 $0.00 0.00%$407,972.65 $0.00 Total POTASH BROOK-FUND 296 $0.00 $0.00 0.00%$0.00 $0.00 Total S/WATER UTILITIES REVENUE $2,629,884.74 ($1,477,708.97)56.19%$1,152,175.77 ($194,620.75) Total STORM WATER UTILITIES $2,629,884.74 ($1,477,708.97)56.19%$1,152,175.77 ($194,620.75) Total All Funds $2,629,884.74 ($1,477,708.97)56.19%$1,152,175.77 ($194,620.75) Expenditure Report-April, 2017 General Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April Total CITY COUNCIL $297,619.00 $138,583.30 46.56%$159,035.70 $914.35 Total ADMINISTRATIVE INSURANCE $4,142,868.80 $3,031,189.19 71.29%$1,220,472.53 $377,492.17 Total CITY MANAGER $563,986.69 $447,205.65 79.29%$116,781.04 $52,610.57 Total LEGAL, ACCOUNTING, ACTUARY $264,700.68 $211,719.58 79.98%$52,981.10 $12,413.77 Total ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $709,233.78 $513,452.58 72.40%$195,781.20 $90,278.84 Total INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $120,237.39 $96,776.91 80.49%$23,460.48 $7,868.87 Total CITY CLERK $256,680.03 $193,477.34 75.38%$63,202.69 $19,475.07 Total ASSESSING/TAX/FINANCE $305,010.48 $246,368.84 80.77%$58,641.64 $19,376.45 Total PLANNING/DESIGN REVIEW $399,813.52 $282,303.62 70.61%$117,509.90 $23,881.37 Total OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT $469,200.00 $448,200.00 95.52%$21,000.00 $0.00 Total GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXP.$7,529,350.37 $5,609,277.01 74.50%$2,028,866.28 $604,311.46 Total FIRE DEPARTMENT $2,585,104.94 $2,372,307.96 91.77%$212,796.98 $167,100.75 Total ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS $2,450.00 $1,603.01 65.43%$846.99 $44.75 Total AMBULANCE $674,682.90 $717,295.91 106.32%($42,613.01)$58,415.64 Total POLICE DEPARTMENT $4,865,039.03 $3,481,375.82 71.56%$1,383,663.21 $259,861.92 Total PUBLIC SAFETY $8,127,276.87 $6,572,582.70 80.87%$1,554,694.17 $485,423.06 Total OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT $735,000.00 $735,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Total HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT $2,464,532.83 $1,463,285.49 59.37%$1,001,247.34 $79,273.52 Total RECREATION ADMINISTRATION $317,845.62 $232,437.01 73.13%$85,408.61 $20,627.08 Total PROGRAMS $26,200.00 $15,789.12 60.26%$10,410.88 $577.74 Total RED ROCKS PARK $16,453.60 $14,199.17 86.30%$2,254.43 $885.08 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April Total FACILITIES $657,120.99 $8,005.57 1.22%$649,115.42 $201.08 Total LEISURE ARTS $3,600.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,600.00 $0.00 Total SPECIAL ACTIVITIES $118,219.00 $88,930.45 75.23%$29,288.55 $7,243.54 Total COMMUNITY LIBRARY $463,376.59 $304,293.34 65.67%$159,083.25 $25,474.64 Total CAPITAL/PARK MAINTENANCE $223,266.01 $187,407.08 83.94%$35,858.93 $14,937.80 Total CULTURE AND RECREATION $1,826,081.81 $851,061.74 46.61%$975,020.07 $69,946.96 Total OTHER OPERATING ENTITIES $693,048.00 $698,593.49 100.80%($5,545.49)$0.00 Total CURRENT PRINCIPAL $796,512.00 $533,588.99 66.99%$262,923.01 $0.00 Total CURRENT INTEREST $762,807.55 $216,455.47 28.38%$546,352.08 $0.00 Total All Funds $22,934,609.43 $16,679,844.89 72.73%$6,363,557.46 $1,238,955.00 Expenditure Report-April, 2017 General Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXP. CITY COUNCIL General Expenses $2,500.00 $2,219.30 88.77%$280.70 $914.35 Housing Trust $50,000.00 $50,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Designated Reserve $155,725.00 $0.00 0.00%$155,725.00 $0.00 Advertising $1,000.00 $1,825.00 182.50%($825.00)$0.00 G.B.I.C.$5,000.00 $5,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 V.L.C.T.$20,644.00 $20,644.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Chamber of Commerce $4,035.00 $0.00 0.00%$4,035.00 $0.00 Social Services $38,975.00 $38,975.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 CCTV-Clickable Meetings $10,000.00 $10,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Councilors $5,480.00 $5,480.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Liquor Control $300.00 $300.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Front Porch Forum $3,960.00 $4,140.00 104.55%($180.00)$0.00 Total CITY COUNCIL $297,619.00 $138,583.30 46.56%$159,035.70 $914.35 ADMINISTRATIVE INSURANCE Salaries $108,792.92 $92,891.75 85.38%$15,901.17 $9,929.20 Payment to Sickbank Fund $125,000.00 $125,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Fringe Benefits $20,030.00 $13,835.78 69.08%$6,194.22 $170.60 FICA/Medicare $10,243.57 $7,062.24 68.94%$3,181.33 $767.24 Non-Taxable Fringe Benefi $1,000.00 $450.00 45.00%$550.00 $0.00 Vision Plan $14,327.33 $11,306.36 78.91%$3,020.97 $1,128.09 Short Term Disability Pla $19,310.76 $15,759.20 81.61%$3,551.56 $1,575.92 Long Term Disability $8,775.00 $0.00 0.00%$8,775.00 $0.00 Group Health Insurance $1,717,299.62 $1,629,444.12 94.88%$87,855.50 $161,557.34 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April Bank - Benefits $80,000.00 $5,975.99 7.47%$74,024.01 $509.04 Group Life Insurance $16,377.50 $32,161.30 196.37%($15,783.80)$3,216.13 Group Dental Insurance $115,179.66 $99,196.27 86.12%$15,983.39 $9,993.31 Pension $865,860.00 $94,679.83 10.93%$771,180.17 $33,985.09 ICMA Match $142,188.36 $114,427.11 80.48%$27,761.25 $9,767.73 Workers Comp Insurance $503,742.00 $421,996.51 83.77%$81,745.49 $86,537.43 Property Insurance $486,035.00 $348,175.64 71.64%$137,859.36 $58,355.05 VLCT Unemployment Insuran $7,500.00 $7,891.97 105.23%($391.97)$0.00 Deductibles/Coinsurance $10,000.00 $10,935.12 109.35%($935.12)$0.00 Total ADMINISTRATIVE INSURANCE $4,142,868.80 $3,031,189.19 71.29%$1,220,472.53 $377,492.17 CITY MANAGER City Mgr.Salaries-Perm.$406,287.29 $372,080.32 91.58%$34,206.97 $43,007.15 City Mgr.Salaries-Other $2,798.90 $0.00 0.00%$2,798.90 ($649.51) Leave Time Turn-In $6,136.00 $0.00 0.00%$6,136.00 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $31,764.50 $29,430.02 92.65%$2,334.48 $3,502.40 Office Supplies $4,500.00 $2,526.75 56.15%$1,973.25 $205.27 Advertising $8,000.00 $7,193.00 89.91%$807.00 $838.00 Telephone $2,000.00 $1,778.42 88.92%$221.58 $233.32 Postage $2,500.00 $1,526.50 61.06%$973.50 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $3,500.00 $2,705.90 77.31%$794.10 $18.60 Printing $3,500.00 $997.64 28.50%$2,502.36 $0.00 Consulting Fees $85,000.00 $21,818.13 25.67%$63,181.87 $4,879.52 Travel & Training $8,000.00 $7,148.97 89.36%$851.03 $575.82 Total CITY MANAGER $563,986.69 $447,205.65 79.29%$116,781.04 $52,610.57 LEGAL, ACCOUNTING, ACTUARY FICA/Medicare $7,214.43 $3,786.13 52.48%$3,428.30 $806.24 Dues and Subscriptions $3,180.00 $2,833.88 89.12%$346.12 $369.14 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April Hiring-required testing $3,000.00 $1,206.50 40.22%$1,793.50 $0.00 Payroll Processing Fees $17,000.00 $15,217.95 89.52%$1,782.05 $1,372.83 Appeals/Abatements $10,000.00 $17,545.17 175.45%($7,545.17)$0.00 Gen Govt. Actuaries/Pensi $22,000.00 $20,100.00 91.36%$1,900.00 $1,800.00 Gen Govt. Audit/Accountin $22,000.00 $27,000.00 122.73%($5,000.00)$100.00 Background Checks $1,000.00 $369.00 36.90%$631.00 $0.00 Legal/Labor/Suits $85,000.00 $65,503.32 77.06%$19,496.68 $15,605.94 Legal Costs $94,306.25 $58,157.63 61.67%$36,148.62 ($7,640.38) Total LEGAL, ACCOUNTING, ACTUARY $264,700.68 $211,719.58 79.98%$52,981.10 $12,413.77 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Muni Bld Cleaning Supplie $1,700.00 $1,377.62 81.04%$322.38 $89.22 Vehicle - Maintenance $2,500.00 $1,260.34 50.41%$1,239.66 $75.17 Office Equipment Fees $12,500.00 $7,274.73 58.20%$5,225.27 $0.00 Muni Bld Cleaning Service $25,000.00 $24,302.15 97.21%$697.85 $2,721.71 City Hall Maintenance $20,000.00 $22,055.69 110.28%($2,055.69)$435.22 Contingency Fund-Infrastr $140,000.00 $74,518.45 53.23%$65,481.55 $825.28 HVAC Maintenance $1,388.00 $2,318.94 167.07%($930.94)$0.00 Positive Pay Fee $700.00 $690.96 98.71%$9.04 $60.64 Electricity-City Hall $33,200.00 $21,713.72 65.40%$11,486.28 $2,498.11 Utilities-City Hall $22,000.00 $12,342.59 56.10%$9,657.41 $2,507.96 Street Lights $135,000.00 $102,193.80 75.70%$32,806.20 $10,964.77 Stormwater User Rent $297,002.68 $228,721.98 77.01%$68,280.70 $69,768.72 Urban Art Project Park $3,000.00 $1,500.00 50.00%$1,500.00 $0.00 Emergency Mgmt Center $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00 Generator Prevent Maint.$1,000.00 $1,726.56 172.66%($726.56)$0.00 Council/Board Secretary $13,243.10 $11,455.05 86.50%$1,788.05 $332.04 Total ADMINSTRATIVE SERVICES $709,233.78 $513,452.58 72.40%$195,781.20 $90,278.84 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IT Staff $54,098.83 $44,177.98 81.66%$9,920.85 $3,161.60 FICA/Medicare $4,138.56 $3,445.10 83.24%$693.46 $243.68 Computer Software $12,000.00 $9,928.45 82.74%$2,071.55 $3,360.49 Assess digital integratio $5,000.00 $3,588.97 71.78%$1,411.03 $0.00 Computer Hardware $35,000.00 $27,050.59 77.29%$7,949.41 $247.85 IT Service $10,000.00 $8,585.82 85.86%$1,414.18 $855.25 Total INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $120,237.39 $96,776.91 80.49%$23,460.48 $7,868.87 CITY CLERK City Clerk Salaries-Perm.$191,813.16 $149,533.81 77.96%$42,279.35 $14,149.19 Leave Time Turn-In $5,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$5,000.00 $0.00 Overtime $1,000.00 $1,741.73 174.17%($741.73)$223.02 FICA/Medicare $15,053.87 $12,425.90 82.54%$2,627.97 $1,148.31 General Supplies $2,500.00 $1,329.78 53.19%$1,170.22 $119.46 Animal Control $4,700.00 $3,976.24 84.60%$723.76 $176.00 Election Expenses $10,000.00 $6,600.26 66.00%$3,399.74 $1,215.07 School Election Expenses $1,500.00 $3,175.80 211.72%($1,675.80)$1,237.72 Telephone $500.00 $184.57 36.91%$315.43 $16.59 Postage $1,700.00 ($2.00)-0.12%$1,702.00 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $375.00 $180.00 48.00%$195.00 $0.00 Printing $365.00 $92.17 25.25%$272.83 $0.00 Contractual Services $4,000.00 $3,675.00 91.88%$325.00 $0.00 Board of Civil Authority $4,200.00 $3,061.15 72.88%$1,138.85 $622.00 Election Workers $4,000.00 $2,717.00 67.93%$1,283.00 $0.00 BCA Appeals/Abatements $1,500.00 $856.00 57.07%$644.00 $320.00 Office Equip Maintenance $2,273.00 $81.81 3.60%$2,191.19 $20.00 Travel & Training $4,700.00 $2,724.64 57.97%$1,975.36 $100.20 Photocopier Lease Prin $1,500.00 $1,123.48 74.90%$376.52 $127.51 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April Total CITY CLERK $256,680.03 $193,477.34 75.38%$63,202.69 $19,475.07 ASSESSING/TAX Assessing/Tax Sal.-Perm.$266,753.81 $218,481.73 81.90%$48,272.08 $17,778.40 Overtime $0.00 $775.73 100.00%($775.73)$0.00 FICA/Medicare $20,406.67 $18,099.47 88.69%$2,307.20 $1,443.02 Office Supplies $1,800.00 $1,563.90 86.88%$236.10 $133.12 Tax Sales Advertising $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00 Telephone $660.00 $243.68 36.92%$416.32 $21.91 Postage $5,500.00 $2,844.32 51.71%$2,655.68 $0.00 Dues and Memberships $590.00 $365.00 61.86%$225.00 $0.00 Printing $3,500.00 $2,556.30 73.04%$943.70 $0.00 NEMRC/APEX $1,300.00 $1,336.85 102.83%($36.85)$0.00 Travel & Training $4,000.00 $101.86 2.55%$3,898.14 $0.00 Total ASSESSING/TAX $305,010.48 $246,368.84 80.77%$58,641.64 $19,376.45 PLANNING/DESIGN REVIEW Planning Salaries-Perm.$285,315.77 $235,333.28 82.48%$49,982.49 $18,471.18 Overtime $6,300.00 $3,666.88 58.20%$2,633.12 $239.59 FICA/Medicare $21,697.75 $18,695.19 86.16%$3,002.56 $1,444.70 Office Supplies $3,000.00 $1,981.27 66.04%$1,018.73 $297.71 Public Meeting Advertisin $4,000.00 $2,246.70 56.17%$1,753.30 $140.40 Telephone $350.00 $129.23 36.92%$220.77 $11.62 Postage $1,250.00 ($3.25)-0.26%$1,253.25 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $1,500.00 $450.00 30.00%$1,050.00 $0.00 Document Printing $2,000.00 $916.46 45.82%$1,083.54 $0.00 Consultants $55,000.00 $5,121.97 9.31%$49,878.03 $3,155.75 Committee Support $2,900.00 $97.57 3.36%$2,802.43 $12.42 Payment for GIS Services $2,500.00 $2,500.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 PC/DRB Stipends $8,500.00 $8,802.07 103.55%($302.07)$0.00 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April Travel & Training $5,500.00 $2,366.25 43.02%$3,133.75 $108.00 Total PLANNING/DESIGN REVIEW $399,813.52 $282,303.62 70.61%$117,509.90 $23,881.37 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT Ambulance Department $155,000.00 $155,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Fuel Pump Reserve Fund $8,200.00 $8,200.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Open Space Reserve Fund $285,000.00 $285,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 To undesignated reserve f $21,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$21,000.00 $0.00 Total OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT $469,200.00 $448,200.00 95.52%$21,000.00 $0.00 Total GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXP.$7,529,350.37 $5,609,277.01 73.44%$2,028,866.28 $604,311.46 PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Salaries-Permanent $1,599,725.44 $1,195,942.99 74.76%$403,782.45 $118,170.84 Holiday Pay $141,225.35 $185,797.09 131.56%($44,571.74)$8,222.85 Fair Labor Standard O/T $107,995.86 $30,926.29 28.64%$77,069.57 $154.44 F/D Overtime - Fill-In $120,000.00 $147,736.88 123.11%($27,736.88)$7,982.30 F/D Overtime - Training $35,000.00 $18,658.86 53.31%$16,341.14 $395.12 F/D Overtime - Emerg Call $7,000.00 $5,264.48 75.21%$1,735.52 $739.21 Wellness/Fitness $7,000.00 $10,875.00 155.36%($3,875.00)$0.00 Fire-Off Duty Outside Emp $3,000.00 $160.00 5.33%$2,840.00 $0.00 New Employee Training $7,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$7,500.00 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $161,638.29 $127,345.74 78.78%$34,292.55 $10,807.37 Office Supplies $2,000.00 $1,803.56 90.18%$196.44 $0.00 Vaccinations-HEP $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00 REHAB Supplies $300.00 $150.16 50.05%$149.84 $0.00 Station Operating Supply $4,500.00 $1,408.62 31.30%$3,091.38 $473.53 Maintenance Tools $420.00 $65.78 15.66%$354.22 $0.00 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April Uniforms-Career $13,400.00 $13,831.57 103.22%($431.57)$0.00 Firefighting Clothing $9,600.00 $7,975.05 83.07%$1,624.95 $0.00 Vehicle Tools $1,000.00 $84.74 8.47%$915.26 $0.00 Gas Chief's vehicle & rei $2,800.00 $1,631.39 58.26%$1,168.61 $107.58 Diesel Fuel $22,000.00 $11,624.12 52.84%$10,375.88 $1,071.35 Oil $600.00 $0.00 0.00%$600.00 $0.00 Films and Books $1,100.00 $18.85 1.71%$1,081.15 $0.00 Fire Prevention Materials $3,000.00 $1,361.81 45.39%$1,638.19 $50.00 Fire Extinguishers $600.00 $166.00 27.67%$434.00 $0.00 Airpacks Maintenance $4,500.00 $1,637.49 36.39%$2,862.51 $200.50 Telephone $14,000.00 $8,019.67 57.28%$5,980.33 $846.63 Postage-Tool Shipping $450.00 $152.92 33.98%$297.08 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $1,350.00 $986.50 73.07%$363.50 $0.00 Fire Station Maintenance $14,000.00 $17,982.92 128.45%($3,982.92)$1,896.85 Laundry and Bedding $900.00 $211.90 23.54%$688.10 $138.65 Radio Repair $2,500.00 $1,988.50 79.54%$511.50 $0.00 Vehicle Maintenance $16,000.00 $12,185.73 76.16%$3,814.27 $420.78 Vehicle Repair $26,000.00 $16,312.30 62.74%$9,687.70 $11,726.94 Equipment R & M $7,500.00 $3,041.36 40.55%$4,458.64 $0.00 Truck Tires $6,000.00 $2,547.88 42.46%$3,452.12 $0.00 Computers Contract ACS $4,500.00 $2,721.98 60.49%$1,778.02 $134.19 Public Safety Equipment $35,000.00 $37,663.01 107.61%($2,663.01)$1,500.00 Conferences $1,500.00 $294.00 19.60%$1,206.00 $0.00 Training Schools $4,000.00 $4,175.34 104.38%($175.34)$33.85 Training Equipment $750.00 $139.40 18.59%$610.60 $0.00 Recruiting & Testing $1,000.00 $924.50 92.45%$75.50 $0.00 Fire Station #2 Heat/Elec $12,500.00 $15,493.58 123.95%($2,993.58)$2,027.77 Fire Safety Equipment $12,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$12,000.00 $0.00 F/D Furniture/Equipment $2,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$2,500.00 $0.00 Inspector Car/Equipment $250.00 $0.00 0.00%$250.00 $0.00 Firefighting Equipment-ho $12,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$12,500.00 $0.00 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April Public Safety Communicati $0.00 $330,000.00 100.00%($330,000.00)$0.00 Note on Quint Fire Truck $153,000.00 $153,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Total FIRE DEPARTMENT $2,585,104.94 $2,372,307.96 91.77%$212,796.98 $167,100.75 ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS Uniforms-Electrical Insp $500.00 $424.30 84.86%$75.70 $0.00 Vehicle-Gas and Repairs $1,200.00 $725.06 60.42%$474.94 $44.75 Dues and Subscriptions $250.00 $453.65 181.46%($203.65)$0.00 Training Costs $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00 Total ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS $2,450.00 $1,603.01 65.43%$846.99 $44.75 AMBULANCE Permanent Salaries $370,779.19 $396,610.03 106.97%($25,830.84)$36,502.43 EMT Pay $80,861.09 $71,251.40 88.12%$9,609.69 $6,612.00 Holiday Pay $33,672.38 $53,770.09 159.69%($20,097.71)$911.70 Fair Labor Standard OT $25,749.47 $29,185.38 113.34%($3,435.91)$2,256.12 Overtime Fill-In $20,000.00 $42,643.30 213.22%($22,643.30)$3,785.73 Overtime - Training $15,000.00 $5,953.13 39.69%$9,046.87 $188.49 Overtime - Emergency Call $5,000.00 $1,100.91 22.02%$3,899.09 $109.08 Wellness $1,000.00 $3,485.00 348.50%($2,485.00)$0.00 FICA/MEDI $37,970.77 $43,492.09 114.54%($5,521.32)$3,560.44 Office Supplies $2,000.00 $927.53 46.38%$1,072.47 $137.45 Medical Supplies-Disposab $23,500.00 $21,442.73 91.25%$2,057.27 $3,426.06 Medical Supplies-Oxygen $4,000.00 $2,130.17 53.25%$1,869.83 $235.21 Medical Equipment Replace $5,000.00 $9,252.84 185.06%($4,252.84)$0.00 Uniforms-Career $7,000.00 $8,188.71 116.98%($1,188.71)$0.00 Diesel Fuel $7,800.00 $3,691.79 47.33%$4,108.21 $358.70 Training Films and Books $750.00 $108.95 14.53%$641.05 $108.95 Telephone $3,000.00 $4,375.67 145.86%($1,375.67)$493.83 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April Billing Postage $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,000.00 $0.00 Dues & Subscriptions $500.00 $120.00 24.00%$380.00 $0.00 Radio Repair $1,750.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,750.00 $0.00 Vehicle Maintenance $2,500.00 $691.81 27.67%$1,808.19 $0.00 Vehicle Repair $3,000.00 $1,168.83 38.96%$1,831.17 $509.45 Equipment R&M $1,250.00 $802.42 64.19%$447.58 $0.00 Office Equip Maintenance $350.00 $511.81 146.23%($161.81)$0.00 Billing Software/Upgrades $4,000.00 $3,265.05 81.63%$734.95 ($780.00) Med Equipment Maintenance $1,000.00 $3,048.27 304.83%($2,048.27)$0.00 Training Programs $3,750.00 $78.00 2.08%$3,672.00 $0.00 Training Equipment $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00 To Reserve Fund-Training $10,000.00 $10,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Total AMBULANCE $674,682.90 $717,295.91 106.32%($42,613.01)$58,415.64 POLICE DEPARTMENT Police Salaries-Permanent $3,210,438.77 $2,267,507.37 70.63%$942,931.40 $182,237.95 Police Salaries-Other $19,500.00 $9,922.31 50.88%$9,577.69 $730.32 Police Salaries-Overtime $321,043.88 $234,039.59 72.90%$87,004.29 $19,841.17 Holiday Pay $134,472.16 $189,153.96 140.66%($54,681.80)$20.68 Automatic Corporal $9,587.38 $0.00 0.00%$9,587.38 $0.00 Shift Differential $52,579.80 $39,096.63 74.36%$13,483.17 $2,555.71 Off-Duty Police Salary $25,000.00 $3,940.00 15.76%$21,060.00 $0.00 Fitness $6,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$6,000.00 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $293,562.98 $212,523.76 72.39%$81,039.22 $15,724.50 Office Supplies $10,500.00 $7,538.66 71.80%$2,961.34 $1,056.38 Range Supplies $12,000.00 $11,139.89 92.83%$860.11 $332.70 Radio Equipment-Supplies $300.00 $0.00 0.00%$300.00 $0.00 Investigative Supplies $8,120.00 $7,357.10 90.60%$762.90 $372.20 Youth Services Supplies $6,000.00 $1,189.69 19.83%$4,810.31 $304.00 Traffic Unit Supplies $2,000.00 $5,431.08 271.55%($3,431.08)$508.50 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April K-9 Supplies $4,000.00 $17,486.11 437.15%($13,486.11)$0.00 Janitorial Supplies $2,800.00 $1,040.26 37.15%$1,759.74 $122.38 Uniform Supplies $40,000.00 $24,314.17 60.79%$15,685.83 $2,853.60 Tires $10,200.00 $8,238.00 80.76%$1,962.00 $0.00 Gas and Oil $74,000.00 $38,752.99 52.37%$35,247.01 $4,857.83 Telephone $32,200.00 $21,642.17 67.21%$10,557.83 $2,670.19 Postage $2,400.00 $1,417.61 59.07%$982.39 $201.00 Dues and Subscriptions $2,300.00 $900.92 39.17%$1,399.08 $105.93 Towing Services $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00 Crime Prevention Supplies $4,500.00 $204.03 4.53%$4,295.97 $0.00 Building Repairs $3,000.00 $914.49 30.48%$2,085.51 $0.00 Building Maintenance $8,000.00 $4,658.27 58.23%$3,341.73 $0.00 3rd Floor Lease $97,284.06 $8,032.04 8.26%$89,252.02 $875.00 Uniform Cleaning $16,000.00 $10,483.20 65.52%$5,516.80 $1,575.75 Office Equip. Contract $5,000.00 $5,501.41 110.03%($501.41)$795.59 Generator Prevent Maint $800.00 $660.00 82.50%$140.00 $0.00 Radio Equip. Maintenance $10,000.00 $1,238.34 12.38%$8,761.66 $0.00 Vehicle Repair $48,000.00 $38,605.17 80.43%$9,394.83 $2,571.84 Computer Connections Syst $14,000.00 $4,289.75 30.64%$9,710.25 $0.00 Equipment Maintenance $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,000.00 $0.00 Records Management System $10,000.00 $8,851.25 88.51%$1,148.75 $0.00 Consulting Services $7,000.00 $13,275.00 189.64%($6,275.00)$2,175.00 IT/Computer Contractor/So $10,000.00 $5,466.00 54.66%$4,534.00 $5,466.00 Animal Control Contracts $24,900.00 $13,801.44 55.43%$11,098.56 $1,993.75 Conferences $6,600.00 $4,315.34 65.38%$2,284.66 ($481.96) In-Service Training $28,500.00 $13,716.70 48.13%$14,783.30 $1,226.43 Recruiting & Testing $4,250.00 $1,227.10 28.87%$3,022.90 $75.00 Electric-Police Dept.$45,000.00 $49,070.00 109.04%($4,070.00)$4,737.72 Heat/Hot Water $7,000.00 $3,171.28 45.30%$3,828.72 $49.26 Building Common Area Fees $55,000.00 $45,626.78 82.96%$9,373.22 $292.50 Cleaning/Building Service $34,200.00 $28,394.67 83.03%$5,805.33 $2,885.00 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April Vehicles and Equipment $77,000.00 $81,772.93 106.20%($4,772.93)$0.00 Police Computerization $66,000.00 $35,468.36 53.74%$30,531.64 $1,130.00 Total POLICE DEPARTMENT $4,865,039.03 $3,481,375.82 71.56%$1,383,663.21 $259,861.92 Total PUBLIC SAFETY $8,127,276.87 $6,572,582.70 82.46%$1,554,694.17 $485,423.06 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT To Capital Improvements $735,000.00 $735,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Total OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT $735,000.00 $735,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 STREETS & HIGHWAYS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Highway Salaries-Perm.$685,829.70 $605,419.50 88.28%$80,410.20 $43,664.30 Leave Time Turn-In $5,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$5,000.00 $0.00 Highway Salaries-Overtime $27,000.00 $27,509.43 101.89%($509.43)$2,447.64 FICA/Medicare $53,468.25 $50,504.68 94.46%$2,963.57 $3,709.85 Office Supplies $2,000.00 $1,780.83 89.04%$219.17 $450.94 Traffic Light Supplies $22,500.00 $11,300.44 50.22%$11,199.56 $586.48 Sign Supplies $5,500.00 $4,166.66 75.76%$1,333.34 $74.53 City Highways Material $35,000.00 $18,196.44 51.99%$16,803.56 $1,031.60 Road Striping $10,000.00 $8,773.50 87.74%$1,226.50 $983.05 Winter Salt $120,000.00 $124,237.08 103.53%($4,237.08)$0.00 Winter Sand $700.00 $307.43 43.92%$392.57 $0.00 Winter Liquid Deicer Addi $15,000.00 $13,195.14 87.97%$1,804.86 $0.00 Building Supplies $1,750.00 $1,067.09 60.98%$682.91 $51.07 Uniforms $19,784.88 $16,646.00 84.13%$3,138.88 $820.68 Vehicle Repair Parts $90,000.00 $49,040.30 54.49%$40,959.70 $3,304.33 School Bus Parts $32,500.00 $30,567.99 94.06%$1,932.01 $242.03 Gasoline $25,000.00 $7,981.75 31.93%$17,018.25 ($2,143.15) Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April Oil $8,000.00 $1,952.53 24.41%$6,047.47 $30.98 Diesel Fuel $45,000.00 $13,581.17 30.18%$31,418.83 ($1,713.38) Diesel/Gasoline Non City $175,000.00 $91,687.81 52.39%$83,312.19 $8,735.41 Fuel Station Maintenance $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,000.00 $0.00 Advertising $1,500.00 $1,500.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Telephone/Internet $8,800.00 $4,712.68 53.55%$4,087.32 $476.37 Building Maintenance $35,000.00 $25,078.37 71.65%$9,921.63 $2,242.77 HVAC Maintenance $4,000.00 $2,178.00 54.45%$1,822.00 $0.00 Generator Prevent Maint $700.00 $1,273.81 181.97%($573.81)$0.00 Tree Care $8,000.00 $4,802.79 60.03%$3,197.21 $0.00 Consulting Services $20,000.00 $12,820.11 64.10%$7,179.89 $6,111.26 Equipment Rental/Purchase $1,500.00 $418.95 27.93%$1,081.05 $0.00 Office Equipment Maintnce $2,000.00 $205.39 10.27%$1,794.61 $0.00 Travel & Training $5,500.00 $5,367.33 97.59%$132.67 $856.00 Utilities - Garage $18,000.00 $14,519.81 80.67%$3,480.19 $1,544.49 Utilities-Garage Heat $17,000.00 $10,324.38 60.73%$6,675.62 $2,136.76 Traffic Lights $35,000.00 $19,365.93 55.33%$15,634.07 $2,087.73 Vehicle Replacement $195,000.00 $177,045.18 90.79%$17,954.82 $365.18 Highway Paving $575,000.00 $51,962.26 9.04%$523,037.74 $741.60 Curbs and Sidewalks $7,500.00 $2,098.88 27.99%$5,401.12 $0.00 Special Projects $150,000.00 $51,695.85 34.46%$98,304.15 $435.00 Total HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT $2,464,532.83 $1,463,285.49 59.37%$1,001,247.34 $79,273.52 Total STREETS & HIGHWAYS $2,464,532.83 $1,463,285.49 59.37%$1,001,247.34 $79,273.52 CULTURE AND RECREATION RECREATION ADMINISTRATION Rec.Admin.Salaries-Perm.$269,195.00 $195,447.42 72.60%$73,747.58 $18,118.46 Leave Time Turn-In $2,635.48 $746.80 28.34%$1,888.68 $746.80 FICA/Medicare $20,725.14 $15,766.26 76.07%$4,958.88 $1,435.68 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April Office Supplies $3,000.00 $2,263.46 75.45%$736.54 $155.67 Telephone $1,200.00 $1,554.40 129.53%($354.40)$130.09 Postage $350.00 $0.00 0.00%$350.00 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $1,000.00 $558.15 55.82%$441.85 $165.00 Scholarships $1,000.00 ($50.00)-5.00%$1,050.00 ($50.00) Printing $7,000.00 $4,291.00 61.30%$2,709.00 $39.00 Software/Printer Contract $4,000.00 $4,266.93 106.67%($266.93)($643.74) Travel & Training $4,200.00 $4,243.31 101.03%($43.31)($50.00) Lease Printer and Copier $3,540.00 $3,349.28 94.61%$190.72 $580.12 Total RECREATION ADMINISTRATION $317,845.62 $232,437.01 73.13%$85,408.61 $20,627.08 PROGRAMS General Supplies $10,000.00 $261.71 2.62%$9,738.29 $0.00 Advertising $2,200.00 $4,338.41 197.20%($2,138.41)$0.00 Senior Programs $5,000.00 $7,602.16 152.04%($2,602.16)$577.74 Special Events $6,000.00 $3,586.84 59.78%$2,413.16 $0.00 School Use $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,000.00 $0.00 Total PROGRAMS $26,200.00 $15,789.12 60.26%$10,410.88 $577.74 RED ROCKS PARK Red Rocks Park Salaries $11,000.00 $9,288.03 84.44%$1,711.97 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $853.60 $774.53 90.74%$79.07 $0.00 General Supplies $3,500.00 $3,620.04 103.43%($120.04)$466.80 Printing $600.00 $413.27 68.88%$186.73 $398.28 Utilities $500.00 $103.30 20.66%$396.70 $20.00 Total RED ROCKS PARK $16,453.60 $14,199.17 86.30%$2,254.43 $885.08 FACILITIES Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April Park Salaries $2,500.00 $587.46 23.50%$1,912.54 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $191.25 $48.47 25.34%$142.78 $0.00 Supplies $5,500.00 $2,760.68 50.19%$2,739.32 $0.00 Fuel-Gas $3,000.00 $890.49 29.68%$2,109.51 $42.20 Facilities Maintenance $2,393.74 $733.09 30.63%$1,660.65 $0.00 Recreation Path Committee $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00 Electric-Jaycee Park $1,600.00 $1,341.37 83.84%$258.63 $20.00 Electric-Dorset Park $3,000.00 $1,275.99 42.53%$1,724.01 $97.48 Electric-Overlook Park $350.00 $202.57 57.88%$147.43 $21.40 Electric-Tennis Courts $550.00 $165.45 30.08%$384.55 $20.00 Capital Projects $118,536.00 $0.00 0.00%$118,536.00 $0.00 Capital Items $42,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$42,000.00 $0.00 Facilities Improvements $48,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$48,000.00 $0.00 Capital Items $429,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$429,000.00 $0.00 Total FACILITIES $657,120.99 $8,005.57 1.22%$649,115.42 $201.08 LEISURE ARTS Chorus Directors $3,600.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,600.00 $0.00 Total LEISURE ARTS $3,600.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,600.00 $0.00 SPECIAL ACTIVITIES Adult Programs $36,000.00 $8,498.54 23.61%$27,501.46 $383.00 Special Events $0.00 $122.78 100.00%($122.78)$122.78 Youth Programs $30,000.00 $20,956.75 69.86%$9,043.25 $6,660.76 Driver's Education $20,000.00 $19,500.00 97.50%$500.00 $0.00 Great Escape Tickets $17,500.00 $8,448.00 48.27%$9,052.00 $37.00 Afternoon Skiing-Middle S $12,000.00 $9,385.00 78.21%$2,615.00 $0.00 City Fest $0.00 $21,659.38 100.00%($21,659.38)$0.00 Telephone $2,719.00 $360.00 13.24%$2,359.00 $40.00 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April Total SPECIAL ACTIVITIES $118,219.00 $88,930.45 75.23%$29,288.55 $7,243.54 COMMUNITY LIBRARY Library Salaries $306,647.09 $241,408.35 78.73%$65,238.74 $22,808.67 FICA/Medicare $23,458.50 $19,637.51 83.71%$3,820.99 $1,850.53 Library Supplies $5,800.00 $3,522.56 60.73%$2,277.44 $0.00 Books - Adult $18,000.00 $12,401.17 68.90%$5,598.83 $657.10 Books - Children $9,550.00 $4,348.82 45.54%$5,201.18 $133.61 DVDs/CDs-Adult $5,500.00 $3,319.43 60.35%$2,180.57 $236.42 DVDs/CDs-Children $2,300.00 $750.10 32.61%$1,549.90 $15.99 Program Supplies-Arts/Cra $2,000.00 $681.05 34.05%$1,318.95 $464.44 Bookmobile Maintenance $500.00 $29.35 5.87%$470.65 $0.00 Postage $440.00 $40.82 9.28%$399.18 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $1,960.00 $2,161.00 110.26%($201.00)$0.00 Online & Print Subscripti $9,000.00 $8,491.81 94.35%$508.19 ($850.00) School Use $62,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$62,500.00 $0.00 Community Programs $6,000.00 $3,897.30 64.96%$2,102.70 $500.00 Computer Operations $0.00 ($4,300.00)100.00%$4,300.00 ($4,300.00) Computer Operations $3,000.00 $2,692.80 89.76%$307.20 $2,692.80 Travel & Training $2,000.00 $1,220.08 61.00%$779.92 $979.08 Computer Improvements $2,400.00 $2,516.36 104.85%($116.36)$286.00 C/L Photocopier Lease Pri $2,321.00 $1,474.83 63.54%$846.17 $0.00 Total COMMUNITY LIBRARY $463,376.59 $304,293.34 65.67%$159,083.25 $25,474.64 CAPITAL/PARK MAINTENANCE Park Maint.Salaries-Perm.$181,275.57 $161,126.30 88.88%$20,149.27 $11,513.00 Park Maint.Sal.-Overtime $0.00 $2,176.11 100.00%($2,176.11)$575.11 FICA/Medicare $13,490.44 $13,202.22 97.86%$288.22 $940.15 Park Supplies $21,000.00 $8,212.67 39.11%$12,787.33 $1,484.02 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April Cemetery Supplies $300.00 $0.00 0.00%$300.00 $0.00 Homestead at Wheeler Park $3,700.00 $2,689.78 72.70%$1,010.22 $425.52 Veterans Memorial Park $3,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,500.00 $0.00 Total CAPITAL/PARK MAINTENANCE $223,266.01 $187,407.08 83.94%$35,858.93 $14,937.80 Total CULTURE AND RECREATION $1,826,081.81 $851,061.74 46.61%$975,020.07 $69,946.96 OTHER OPERATING ENTITIES County Court $136,000.00 $141,546.48 104.08%($5,546.48)$0.00 Winooski Valley Park $55,114.00 $55,114.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 C.C.T.A.$465,522.00 $465,521.01 100.00%$0.99 $0.00 Regional Planning $36,412.00 $36,412.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Total OTHER OPERATING ENTITIES $693,048.00 $698,593.49 100.80%($5,545.49)$0.00 Total OTHER ENTITIES $693,048.00 $698,593.49 100.80%($5,545.49)$0.00 CURRENT PRINCIPAL, BONDS Public Works Facility $98,568.00 $98,568.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Kennedy Dr Reconstrction $22,440.00 $22,508.00 100.30%($68.00)$0.00 Lime Kiln Bridge $22,440.00 $22,508.00 100.30%($68.00)$0.00 PENSION LIABILITY-PRINCIP $262,974.00 $0.00 0.00%$262,974.00 $0.00 F/D Building Improvements $30,090.00 $30,004.99 99.72%$85.01 $0.00 Police Headquarters $360,000.00 $360,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Total CURRENT PRINCIPAL, BONDS $796,512.00 $533,588.99 66.99%$262,923.01 $0.00 CURRENT INTEREST, BONDS Public Works Facility $24,778.02 ($2,461.19)-9.93%$27,239.21 $0.00 Sewer Note-Police Fitup $68,877.06 $0.00 0.00%$68,877.06 $0.00 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April Kennedy Dr Recnstrction $9,183.57 $7,772.17 84.63%$1,411.40 $0.00 Lime Kiln Bridge $9,183.57 $7,772.17 84.63%$1,411.40 $0.00 PENSION LIABILITY-INTERES $397,975.00 $0.00 0.00%$397,975.00 $0.00 Sewer Note-Solar Array $12,004.00 $12,004.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 F/D Building Improvements $12,314.33 $10,360.93 84.14%$1,953.40 $0.00 Police Headquarters $228,492.00 $182,870.38 80.03%$45,621.62 $0.00 Parkland, 1992 $0.00 ($1,862.99)100.00%$1,862.99 $0.00 Total CURRENT INTEREST, BONDS $762,807.55 $216,455.47 28.38%$546,352.08 $0.00 Total GENERAL FUND $22,934,609.43 $16,679,844.89 72.73%$6,363,557.46 $1,238,955.00 Total All Funds $22,934,609.43 $16,679,844.89 72.73%$6,363,557.46 $1,238,955.00 Expenditure Report-April, 2017 Sewer Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April W/POLLUTION CONTROL EXPS. Salaries-Permanent $463,664.09 $348,318.32 75.12%$115,345.77 $31,008.01 Payment to Highway-wages $269,000.00 $272,772.89 101.40%($3,772.89)$876.88 Leave Time Turn-In $6,715.91 $0.00 0.00%$6,715.91 $0.00 Salaries-Overtime $36,028.29 $38,813.32 107.73%($2,785.03)$3,494.47 Payroll Svc & Testing to $724.50 $700.00 96.62%$24.50 $0.00 PAFO Certification $9,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$9,000.00 $0.00 Sick Bank Payouts $10,127.56 $0.00 0.00%$10,127.56 $0.00 Fringe Benefits $1,675.00 $241.70 14.43%$1,433.30 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $35,353.40 $30,623.15 86.62%$4,730.25 $2,681.66 Payment to Highway-FICA/M $22,000.00 $22,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Vision Plan $832.74 $673.84 80.92%$158.90 $64.93 Disability Income $1,609.80 $958.30 59.53%$651.50 $95.83 Long Term Disability Insu $2,827.50 $4,012.30 141.90%($1,184.80)$401.23 Group Health Insurance $109,198.27 $78,430.10 71.82%$30,768.17 $7,446.33 Benefit Reimbursed to Hig $75,000.00 $75,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Group Life Insurance $1,001.25 $2,128.60 212.59%($1,127.35)$212.86 Group Dental Insurance $5,411.73 $6,081.78 112.38%($670.05)$647.72 Pension $78,705.61 $37,811.69 48.04%$40,893.92 $12,237.67 ICMA Match $16,258.34 $13,228.70 81.37%$3,029.64 $1,205.72 Pension Payment to Highwa $82,000.00 $82,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Pension Note Payment $38,675.00 $0.00 0.00%$38,675.00 $0.00 Office Supplies $1,000.00 $1,340.89 134.09%($340.89)$0.00 Plant Supplies $85,000.00 $68,880.87 81.04%$16,119.13 $6,611.60 Ferrous Chloride $500.00 $0.00 0.00%$500.00 $0.00 Polymer $95,000.00 $51,914.69 54.65%$43,085.31 $0.00 Sewer Line Maint/Supplies $15,000.00 $5,377.48 35.85%$9,622.52 $1,002.07 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April Pumping Station Supplies $20,000.00 $14,006.27 70.03%$5,993.73 $306.82 Laboratory Supplies $10,000.00 $6,816.82 68.17%$3,183.18 $1,292.37 Caustic Soda and Lime $55,000.00 $61,446.77 111.72%($6,446.77)$4,673.12 Alum $70,000.00 $68,326.39 97.61%$1,673.61 $7,103.63 Water-Airport-B/B-Pump $1,750.00 $901.81 51.53%$848.19 $56.20 Generator Preventive Main $5,000.00 $6,680.00 133.60%($1,680.00)$0.00 Clothing Supplies $4,594.02 $2,066.61 44.98%$2,527.41 $72.99 Truck Parts $6,000.00 $7,071.46 117.86%($1,071.46)$81.27 Gas - Diesel Fuel - Oil $14,500.00 $7,064.45 48.72%$7,435.55 $634.83 Fuel - Airport Parkway $50,000.00 $41,737.95 83.48%$8,262.05 $5,805.48 Fuel - Bartlett Bay $5,500.00 $4,426.32 80.48%$1,073.68 $1,180.46 Advertising $0.00 $167.20 100.00%($167.20)$0.00 Telephone and Alarms $5,500.00 $5,382.80 97.87%$117.20 $327.23 Postage $100.00 $45.02 45.02%$54.98 $9.80 Memberships/Dues $750.00 $564.00 75.20%$186.00 $0.00 Discharge Permits $20,000.00 $13,650.00 68.25%$6,350.00 $0.00 Workers Comp Insurance $16,458.94 $14,031.81 85.25%$2,427.13 $2,827.47 Property Insurance $42,007.00 $35,995.41 85.69%$6,011.59 $7,897.87 Unemployment Insurance $966.81 $1,036.78 107.24%($69.97)$0.00 Safety $5,000.00 $14,429.95 288.60%($9,429.95)$6,390.21 Billing Payment to CWD $37,000.00 $23,022.50 62.22%$13,977.50 $0.00 Soil/Sludge Management $145,000.00 $89,842.25 61.96%$55,157.75 $6,489.49 Discharge Water Testing $1,250.00 $470.00 37.60%$780.00 $0.00 Landfill Fees $5,000.00 $675.00 13.50%$4,325.00 $0.00 HVAC Maintenance $10,500.00 $7,417.34 70.64%$3,082.66 $0.00 Auditing $6,214.00 $6,214.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Engineering/Consulting $50,000.00 $71,400.00 142.80%($21,400.00)$6,390.25 Landfill Engineering $10,000.00 $15,938.30 159.38%($5,938.30)$0.00 PMT TO STORMWATER-GIS $4,000.00 $4,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Office Equipment Contract $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,500.00 $0.00 Wireless Communication $2,400.00 $1,492.93 62.21%$907.07 $180.86 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April Administrative Services $150,335.71 $150,335.71 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Burlington Sewer Lines $217,500.00 $115,784.10 53.23%$101,715.90 $115,784.10 Travel & Training $3,000.00 $1,772.92 59.10%$1,227.08 $230.00 Hinesburg Rd Pumping Dsgn $12,500.00 $0.00 0.00%$12,500.00 $0.00 Utilities-Pumping Station $58,000.00 $43,947.68 75.77%$14,052.32 $6,240.82 Utilities--L/Fill Station $5,000.00 $1,446.98 28.94%$3,553.02 $0.00 Electric-Airport Parkway $210,000.00 $124,348.21 59.21%$85,651.79 $0.00 Electric-Bartlett Bay $115,000.00 $79,989.49 69.56%$35,010.51 $9,070.29 Building Improvements $5,000.00 $8,008.63 160.17%($3,008.63)$0.00 Pumps Replacements $35,000.00 $39,937.42 114.11%($4,937.42)$0.00 Pump Repairs $25,000.00 $33,361.45 133.45%($8,361.45)$0.00 Loan for Airport Parkway $1,272,059.74 $0.00 0.00%$1,272,059.74 $0.00 Bartlett Bay Bond Replace $245,000.00 $245,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Scope BTV/SB Sewer $45,000.00 $21,944.85 48.77%$23,055.15 $10,944.72 Capital Improvements-CIP $100,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$100,000.00 $0.00 Total W/POLLUTION CONTROL EXPS.$4,566,695.21 $2,533,506.20 55.48%$2,033,189.01 $261,977.26 Total ENTERPRISE FUND/W.P.C.$4,566,695.21 $2,533,506.20 55.48%$2,033,189.01 $261,977.26 Total All Funds $4,566,695.21 $2,533,506.20 55.48%$2,033,189.01 $261,977.26 Expenditure Report-April, 2017 Stormwater Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April S/WATER UTILITIES EXPS Salaries-Permanent $418,385.30 $326,662.57 78.08%$91,722.73 $30,219.33 Leave Time Turn-In $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$3,000.00 $0.00 Salaries-Overtime $20,000.00 $8,665.90 43.33%$11,334.10 $647.48 Payroll Svc & Testing to $480.00 $480.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Fringe Benefits $3,575.00 $10.60 0.30%$3,564.40 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $33,147.74 $28,029.26 84.56%$5,118.48 $2,554.03 Vision Plan $802.12 $423.54 52.80%$378.58 $39.90 Disability Income Insuran $2,026.08 $781.60 38.58%$1,244.48 $78.16 Group Health Insurance $84,999.99 $49,757.87 58.54%$35,242.12 $4,931.41 Reimburse to Highway Bene $9,125.00 $10,000.00 109.59%($875.00)$0.00 Group Life Insurance $1,001.25 $1,394.90 139.32%($393.65)$139.49 Group Dental Insurance $6,299.13 $4,234.24 67.22%$2,064.89 $387.67 Pension $40,082.45 $0.00 0.00%$40,082.45 $0.00 ICMA Match $22,548.84 $15,681.12 69.54%$6,867.72 $1,416.16 Pension Note Payment $26,510.00 $0.00 0.00%$26,510.00 $0.00 Office Supplies $2,250.00 $2,308.33 102.59%($58.33)$269.93 Small Equipment/Tools $4,000.00 $1,564.08 39.10%$2,435.92 $48.24 Uniforms/Supplies $5,270.30 $4,290.40 81.41%$979.90 $407.35 Gasoline $4,500.00 $2,015.23 44.78%$2,484.77 $222.68 Oil $350.00 $42.39 12.11%$307.61 $0.00 Diesel Fuel $8,000.00 $3,791.59 47.39%$4,208.41 $1,053.71 Permit Requirement-Educat $10,900.00 $7,780.00 71.38%$3,120.00 $0.00 Telephone $2,400.00 $1,804.42 75.18%$595.58 $135.38 Postage $200.00 $190.65 95.33%$9.35 $66.37 Membership/Dues $600.00 $213.00 35.50%$387.00 $0.00 Discharge Permits Renewal $21,500.00 $29,964.80 139.37%($8,464.80)$654.40 Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2017 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid April Workers Comp Insurance $9,000.00 $5,283.70 58.71%$3,716.30 $1,546.10 Property Insurance $5,305.00 $8,586.42 161.86%($3,281.42)$3,042.45 Unemployment Insurance $2,000.00 $1,519.25 75.96%$480.75 $0.00 GIS-Fees/Software $12,000.00 $7,317.25 60.98%$4,682.75 $0.00 Sediment & Depris Disposa $750.00 $205.49 27.40%$544.51 $185.00 Water Quality Monitoring $35,000.00 $30,992.00 88.55%$4,008.00 $0.00 Building/Grounds Maint $1,600.00 $0.00 0.00%$1,600.00 $0.00 Vehicle Maintenance $7,500.00 $4,446.39 59.29%$3,053.61 $66.60 Storm System Maint Materi $60,000.00 $11,789.64 19.65%$48,210.36 $102.00 Printing $100.00 $0.00 0.00%$100.00 $0.00 Legal Services $15,000.00 $6,474.97 43.17%$8,525.03 $471.20 To GF-Audit and Actuary $3,555.00 $3,555.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Engineering-Nghbrhd Asst $24,000.00 $517.50 2.16%$23,482.50 $0.00 Billing Payment CWD $43,000.00 $23,022.50 53.54%$19,977.50 $0.00 Office Equipment Maintena $750.00 $0.00 0.00%$750.00 $0.00 Equipment Rental $1,500.00 $488.89 32.59%$1,011.11 $0.00 Administrative Services $134,391.55 $134,391.55 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Conference/Training Expen $4,250.00 $2,289.10 53.86%$1,960.90 $45.00 S/W Bldg Utilities $3,750.00 $2,703.83 72.10%$1,046.17 $402.23 Stormwater Pumps Electric $480.00 $164.11 34.19%$315.89 $0.00 Vehicles/Equipment $200,000.00 $0.00 0.00%$200,000.00 $0.00 Stormwater Capital Projec $1,300,000.00 $104,056.19 8.00%$1,195,943.81 $9,235.69 Office Furniture/Equipmen $1,000.00 $771.78 77.18%$228.22 $0.00 Flow Restoration Plan Ana $15,000.00 $21,938.08 146.25%($6,938.08)$0.00 Reimbursement to Highway $18,000.00 $18,000.00 100.00%$0.00 $0.00 Engineering $0.00 $2,083.00 100.00%($2,083.00)$2,083.00 Total STORM WATER UTILITIES $2,629,884.75 $890,683.13 33.87%$1,739,201.62 $60,450.96 Total All Funds $2,629,884.75 $890,683.13 33.87%$1,739,201.62 $60,450.96