Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - 09/06/2016 CITY COUNCIL 6 SEPTEMBER 2016 The South Burlington City Council held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 6 September 2016, at 6:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. MEMBERS PRESENT: H. Riehle, Chair; P. Nowak, T. Chittenden, T. Barritt, M. Emery ALSO PRESENT: K. Dorn, City Manager; T. Hubbard, Deputy City Manager; P. Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning; G. Maille, K. Robison, L. Brakel, C. Sargent, CNAPC; K. Epstein, S. Swanson, B. Miller, J> Kearnan, R. Neuer, J. Sequin, R. Greco, L. Darlington, E. & K. Lesser-Goldsmith 1. Agenda Review: Additions, deletions or changes in order of agenda items: Ms. Riehle asked to add an item under Other Business regarding the late fee for tax payments. Mr. Dorn asked to discuss under Other Business a Step 3 grievance and the obligations of the Council. 2. Comments & Questions from the public not related to the agenda: Mr. Neuer, a member of the Bike/Ped Committee, speaking as an individual, expressed concerns with the situation along Dorset Street from Kennedy Drive to Swift Street. He said people want to cross from Songbird Lane to the other side, and sight lines are not adequate for a safe crosswalk. The reality is that people will cross there anyway as the alternative is to walk to Swift Street and legally cross or go down the west side of Dorset St. to the short sidewalk. Mr. Neuer noted that the long range plan is to extend the sidewalk. He suggested that in the short term, there might be a possibility of some traffic calming, possibly 10-foot or 9-foot travel lanes to provide for a wider shoulder. He wasn’t sure if Public Works would be amenable to this and felt the public might not like it. 3. Announcements and City Manager’s Report: Council members reported on meetings and events they had attended. Mr. Dorn: Council members and the public are invited to the 9/11 remembrance at Overlook Park at 7 p.m. on that day. The Steering Committee will meet on 13 September at City Hall. The South Burlington Business Association Summer Mixer will take place on 15 September at Magic Hat. The Annual Bikes and Bites event will be held on 15 September at Veterans Park. The first meeting of the Affordable Housing Committee will be on 21 September. On 7 September, representatives from Chittenden County communities will be interviewing applicants for the dispatch study. Staff and attorneys met today to discuss implementation of the BTV tax settlement. Mr. Dorn, Mr. Hubbard and Mr. Rabidoux looked at issues at Overlook Park (paving, etc.) Some re-designing may be needed. On Thursday of next week there will be changes made to the City Clerk’s office, including the insertion of a window in front as a security measure. The office will continue doing business during the work. 4. Consent Agenda: a. Sign Disbursement b. Approve Minutes for 15 August 2016 c. Appoint Deputy City Manager Tom Hubbard as voting delegate to the VLCT Annual Business Meeting Members clarified that in the Minutes of 15 August, page 7, obligation for insurance remains with the homeowners association as does ownership. The spelling of Mr. Daum’s name was corrected on p. 1 and p. 5. Ms. Emery moved to approve the Consent Agenda with noted changes. Ms. Nowak seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Council discussion and resident input regarding Dorset Street traffic and pedestrian issues: Mr. Lesser-Goldsmith noted Healthy Living has been in business on Dorset Street for 30 years and is a proud member of the business community in South Burlington. Feedback from customers is important to them, and there has been a lot of feedback on Dorset Street issues. Mr. Lesser-Goldsmith showed a video done by a resident indicating issues at Dorset Street and Garden Street intersection. He noted that the lights are never all red, and there are only 8 seconds when the “cross” light is on before it goes to “don’t cross.” During this time, cars already have a green light to turn left onto Dorset Street from Garden Street and are already in the crosswalk. In addition, at the UMall intersection, the “cross” light is on for only 2 seconds, then it turns black (with no “don’t cross”) light. Similar safety concerns exist here with turning traffic. Mr. Lesser-Goldsmith cited a very good intersection at Dorset Street and Barnes & Noble where all the lights go red, and there is enough time for pedestrians to cross safely in all directions. He noted that Dorset St. is the busiest shopping street in Vermont, and the city is trying to encourage walking in the area. Now that is not safe at the 2 indicated intersections. Ms. Nowak said she was disappointed to hear of a 2‐second “cross” light especially as these streets will be developed even more going forward. She did note that with a 4‐way crossing, the “right turn on red” would have to be eliminated and this could be a problem at some times of the year. She said that in Burlington, there is a pedestrian-activated light at Bank Street and South Winooski Avenue which works quite well. She also liked the concept used at Fanny Allen on Route 15. Mr. Lesser-Goldsmith also felt that light synchronization was an issue as traffic backs up at all four intersections on Dorset Street which creates frustration for drivers. He felt synchronizing the lights would alleviate this. Mr. Dorn said the city is in the planning phase of “adaptive signaling” which is the next generation of light synchronization. It adapts to the demand placed on the infrastructure and can change to meet that demand. South Burlington will be one of the first cities to have this within the next 18 months. It is taking time for the funding to be available. He felt that would be the best solution for the Dorset Street issues. Mr. Lesser-Goldsmith asked if there could be light synchronization in the meantime. Mr. Dorn said he would discuss this with Public Works as there are a lot of factors to consider. He noted the city is well aware of the massive reconfiguring of traffic with the development of City Center and re- development of UMall. He will report back to the Council within the next 2 meetings. 6. Discussion and possible action regarding a City of South Burlington financial contribution to the Chill Out Center: Ms. Emery recused herself during the discussion as her son is on the Board of the Center. Mr. Dorn noted the request is for $6800.00. Ms. Nowak asked what the expected “plus side” revenue is from the FY16 budget. Mr. Hubbard said the estimate is $172,000. Ms. Nowak then asked the amount that the auditors ask the city to set aside in a contingency fund. Mr. Hubbard said about $1,700,000.00 minimum. Adding the $172,000 would result in a fund of $913,000. Ms. Nowak asked if the Council is going to be asked to participate in the appeal of the F-35 lawsuit decision. Ms. Riehle said that is not her intention. Ms. Nowak said she felt this is a worthwhile project, but it is coming in an off-budget time. The Mall is being reduced in value, and a credit is being given to the Airport as a result of that settlement. She felt that in fairness to taxpayers the Council had to look at everything. Mr. Chittenden cited the need for teen programming in the community, but he was also concerned with setting a precedent for “out of cycle” requests of this sort. He felt $6800 was high in light of what other agencies receive, and he suggested that possibly the School Board be asked to match a smaller grant from the Council. Ms. Riehle asked Mr. Miller if they have approached the School Board. Mr. Miller said they have not. He did note that they have acquired a larger space in the Mall (4075 sq. ft.) so they can accommodate more youth. This will be a drug, alcohol and tobacco free space for youth with opportunities for mentoring, job information, help with homework, etc. There will always be adult supervision and cooperation with UMall security people. It will be open to students from everywhere but will probably serve mostly South Burlington students. Mr. Hubbard noted the city is about to send out letters to non-profits for FY18 funding, and applications will be due in October. Ms. Nowak said she was willing to support $3400. Members suggested going with that amount and asking the School Board to come up with an equal amount. Ms. Riehle moved to support the Chill Out Center in the amount of $3400.00. Mr. Chittenden seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Follow Up with CNAPC from July 8th Presentation: Mr. Conner noted the good news that Public Works has acted on CNAPC’s first request for a bike lane on Patchen Road from White Street to the Interstate. Public Works is also working on the recommended crosswalk at White Street and Airport Parkway. There was a request for a bike lane network in the neighborhood which would include White Street and Airport Parkway. The width is there to allow for a bike lane, but parking is now allowed on those streets, and you can’t have both parking and bike lane. Mr. Dorn said it would require a change to the parking Ordinance. Signage could be done in house. Ms. Nowak noted the city is working on a parking ordinance before the previous City Attorney left, and she would want to do this as a whole piece. She also questioned how things such as delivery trucks, repair trucks, etc. would be handled. Mr. Dorn then updated the Council on the Ordinance effort. It was realized that there has to be a street inventory done, and the city would have to commit someone’s time to do this (either someone from Public Works or the Police Department). Mr. Dorn added that the Ordinance exists, and the Council can amend it at any time. Mr. Conner said the first step toward an amendment to the Ordinance would be a first reading. The Council could then decide whether to hold a public hearing. Members agreed to take that first step. Ms. Sargent, Chair of CNAPC, said the Committee hoped the Council could provide a time-line for other amenities recommended in their report (e.g., welcome signs, whimsical crosswalks, etc.), things that don’t cost a lot but would add to the neighborhood. Mr. Barritt suggested getting some school involvement in the whimsical crosswalks. Ms. Sargent felt that was a great idea. Ms. Riehle asked if it would help to continue to have a neighborhood committee. Ms. Sargent said some committee members wanted to continue of CNAPC while others did not (most who didn’t don’t live in the immediate area). Ms. Riehle said she would love to have the Committee reborn and decide its priorities. Ms. Sargent said she is having a gathering at her home and will speak to members then and come back to the Council in a few weeks. Ms. Emery suggested Ms. Sargent contact the Chamberlin art teacher to coordinate an art project. Ms. Riehle suggested reconstituting CNAPC and having them come in with priorities to consider for budgeting. 8. Council discussion and possible action regarding proposed Burlington International Airport Sound Mitigation Committee: Ms. Riehle said she was disappointed with the Airport’s proposal. It appears to her that the mission the Airport Director came up with is more about the economic aspects of the Airport. While that is important, the whole purpose was to create a committee to address noise issue and allow for a dialog between the community and the Airport and its partners (Air Guard, etc.) so that there could be an understanding of the community’s feelings about noise. Ms. Riehle noted that the proposed committee would have 23 people, 12 of whom have a direct connection to the Airport or Air Guard. GBIC is also represented, and Ms. Riehle could not figure why they would be involved in a noise discussion. Ms. Emery noted that Airport Directors would be chairing and vice-chairing the committee and sub-committees. She felt the concerns should be drawn from the community so that various levels of expertise would be employed to work with the public to let them know what could and could not be done. Ms. Emery noted that neither the Airport Director nor Airport Commissioner attended a CNAPC meeting, though they were part of the Committee. Ms. Nowak noted that she is an Airport Commissioner and did attend meetings though Mr. Keogh did not. Ms. Riehle suggested writing to the Airport voicing the city’s disappointment and suggesting the need for a differently configured committee to deal with very specific issues. Mr. Chittenden felt a letter would be fine, asking where they can come together to be more in sync with what CNAPC has recommended. Ms. Emery noted that even the Airport Commission isn’t chaired by the Airport Director; it is chaired by a citizen. Ms. Robison, a member of the Noise Subcommittee of CNAPC said they had wanted to create a committee under the City Council as there will always be issues. She noted that the Airport Committee at its first meeting next week is bringing in consultants who have worked on noise mitigation. She felt that would be good to listen to. She also felt the CNAPC purpose statement was much clearer than the Airport’s. Ms. Nowak said she understood that the CNAPC sound committee would be a permanent committee. Ms. Robison said that is what they would like. She also felt the Airport Committee is large and unwieldy, and they only plan to meet annually. She said they would prefer a “small and nimble” committee where the public can come and tell their concerns. She suggested a meeting with the Airport prior to their committee’s meeting to discuss the details of how their committee is set up and then to decide if the city/CNAPC can work with them. Ms. Robison stressed she would like to participate in the Airport’s committee, but also wanted to have a South Burlington Noise Sub‐Committee. Mr. Maille noted that the Airport’s committee is not formed under state enabling legislation and that no minutes would be taken. He agreed that the city should try to “restructure” their agenda. He also suggested the City Attorney look into how to form a South Burlington Noise Committee according to statute and which can’t be disbanded at someone’s will. Ms. Sargent noted that CNAPC had suggested a 9-person committee with representation from Winooski, Williston, etc. They would report back to the City Council which could then take action. Ms. Nowak suggested going to the Airport’s meeting to get some answers. Ms. Riehle agreed. The Council could then decide whether to “put all of its eggs in their one basket” or “to have our own basket.” Ms. Robison stressed that CNAPC wants to work in good faith with the Airport and hoped they would act in good faith with them. Ms. Emery then moved to appoint Mr. Dorn, Mr. Conner, Ms. Sargent, and Mr. Maille to attend the 14 September Airport Committee meeting. Mr. Chittenden seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. Energy Committee Update: Mr. Epstein noted the focus of the Committee has been the Georgetown Prize. Georgetown has not released new data, so the Committee does not know where it stands in the prize process. They are, however, still pressing forward. So far, there has been a reduction in electricity use. Gas use is flat. Mr. Epstein noted that residential energy use is 13 times municipal use. Municipal use can be controlled while residential use cannot. Some of the things the Committee has been doing to increase awareness include: 27 ads in The Other Paper, workshops in the Library (the next one is 9/19), real estate agents giving out energy-wise gift bags to new homeowners, the requirement of the stretch code compliance city-wide, presentations at City Fest, etc. Mr. Epstein advised that residents will now be able to borrow a power meter from the Library to measure their energy use, and soon they will be able to borrow an infrared camera to check energy loss. Ms. Nowak asked if there have been energy-related things for students to take home to their parents. Mr. Epstein said that depends on the teachers. He noted the School District did get awards for things they have done energy-wise. Mr. Epstein thanked Mr. Dorn for “shaking loose” the Commons Energy campaign. Things are moving now, and anything the Council can do to get that implemented before the end of the year would be very important. 10. Library Board of Trustees Applicant Interview: The Council interviewed Linda Darlington for appointment to the Library Board of Trustees. 11. City Center Update: Mr. Dorn updated members on the city’s efforts to educate the public about the upcoming TIF vote (November ballot). Efforts include: ads in The Other Paper, two meetings (9/26 and 10/26 at the Library) with full agendas, inclusion of items on 2 City Council meetings before the election, utilizing Library and Recreation Department newsletters, three streaming sessions on social media, and as much free media time as the city can get. Ms. Nowak suggested a banner in front of City Hall. Ms. Dorn cited the need to be careful about advocacy. Ms. Riehle said they could just say “Please vote.” Ms. Emery said they will be using 2 City Council Corners in The Other Paper. She also suggested contacting the City Center Collaborative for help. Ms. Nowak said she would ask the South Burlington Business Association as well. Mr. Dorn stressed that the money is already there to pay for both projects (from development and from impact fees). The vote is needed to activate the TIF. 12. Council discussion and possible action regarding streetlights on Shelburne Road: Both Ms. Riehle and Ms. Emery noted dark areas on Shelburne Road because of lights that have been turned off. Mr. Dorn said the city needs Council authority to turn them back on. Ms. Riehle noted they are LED lights and electric cost would be minimal. Ms. Nowak said business owners have contacted her with concerns about safety of customers. She noted the city is already paying to lease the lights. Mr. Barritt asked the cost of electricity for the lights. Mr. Dorn did not have that specific information. Ms. Nowak asked to turn back on the Shelburne Road lights which had previously been turned off. Mr. Chittenden seconded. Motion passed 4-1 with Mr. Barritt opposing because he did not know the cost. 13. FY16 Draft Financials: Mr. Hubbard reviewed the $172,000 that will be going back onto the balance sheet bringing it to $913,000. A member of the audience asked what is going on with the sewer on Proctor Avenue. Mr. Hubbard explained that the city has been paying Burlington for sewer use in that area. Burlington recently doubled the cost, and Public Works is going to reroute sewage to the Bartlett Bay plant. The cost to do this would be quickly recovered. Mr. Hubbard said he will have a budget preparation schedule at the next meeting and will come on 3 October with the major factors anticipated in the FY18 budget. Health Insurance will be one of these. There will also be a recommendation from the Pension Advisory Committee for “smoothing” of assets to avoid “spikes.” 14. Liquor Control Board: Ms. Emery moved that the Council convene as Liquor Control Board. Mr. Barritt seconded. Motion passed unanimously. The Council considered a request from CVS Pharmacy for a second class license. No issues were raised, though Ms. Riehle found it ironic that pharmacies are selling liquor and cigarettes (it was noted that CVS no longer sells cigarettes). Ms. Emery moved to grant the second class license to CVS Pharmacy as presented. Mr. Chittenden seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Ms. Emery moved to reconvene as City Council. Ms. Nowak seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 15. Possible executive session to discuss appointment to Library Board of Trustees: Members felt the executive session was not needed. 16. Possible Council appointments to South Burlington Boards , Commissions and Committees: Ms. Nowak moved to appoint Linda Darlington to the Library Board of Trustees. Ms. Emery seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 17. Other Business: a. Items held from the Consent Agenda: No items were held from the Consent Agenda. b. Other: 1- Ms. Riehle felt another discussion of penalties for delinquent taxes was warranted as a resident has raised some things to consider. Members felt it would be nice to know what other communities do. Mr. Dorn said South Burlington’s rate is 3%. Any change would require a Charter change. He noted that staff does consider some late excuses including death of a taxpayer or of a near relative or taxpayer hospitalization. He said he would scan neighboring communities to see their rates. Mr. Barritt noted that if you once get charged a late fee, you never do it again. 2- Mr. Dorn advised receipt of a notice from the South Burlington Police Association regarding a Step 3 Grievance. He explained the process and said the Council now has 10 days in which to convene an executive session to answer the appeal. The matter involves a promotion process. After a brief discussion, the Council agreed to hold the executive session on 12 September at 6:30 p.m. in the medium conference room. They also asked that the Council have legal representation present. As there was no further business to come before the Council, Mr. Chittenden moved to adjourn. Mr. Barritt seconded. Motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 10:25 p.m. Clerk Published by ClerkBase ©2019 by Clerkbase. No Claim to Original Government Works. South Burlington Water Dept. Accounts Payable Check Register Date: 09/07/16 Date Check No. Paid To Memo Amount Paid 9/7/2016 3051 South Burlington Ace 24.48 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 8/31/2016 VI-14082 793999/3 24.48 24.48 9/7/2016 3052 Aldrich & Elliott, PC 2,139.82 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 8/2/2016 VI-14073 76397 2,139.82 2,139.82 9/7/2016 3053 Champlain Water District 51,297.85 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 8/31/2016 VI-14075 SBWD-317 51,297.85 51,297.85 9/7/2016 3054 Champlain Water District 121,549.91 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 8/31/2016 VI-14076 SBWD-310 92.38 92.38 8/31/2016 VI-14077 AUGUST CONSUMPTION 121,457.53 121,457.53 9/7/2016 3055 E.J. Prescott, Inc. 918.49 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 8/10/2016 VI-14068 5123220 551.84 551.84 8/8/2016 VI-14071 5124488 30.03 30.03 8/4/2016 VI-14072 5123217 55.18 55.18 8/4/2016 VI-14080 5122611 281.44 281.44 9/7/2016 3056 Engineers Construction Inc. 8,915.88 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 8/11/2016 VI-14067 25673 8,915.88 8,915.88 9/7/2016 3057 Ferguson Waterworks #590 152.16 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 8/10/2016 VI-14070 0407588-1 152.16 152.16 9/7/2016 3058 Frank W. Whitcomb Construction 1,126.00 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 8/3/2016 VI-14066 00672001 1,126.00 1,126.00 9/7/2016 3059 Green Mountain Flagging, LLC 450.17 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 8/8/2016 VI-14065 19653 450.17 450.17 9/7/2016 3060 City Of South Burlington 269,159.54 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 9/1/2016 VI-14079 AUGUST SEWER 269,159.54 269,159.54 Printed: September 02, 2016 Page 1 of 2 South Burlington Water Dept. Accounts Payable Check Register Date: 09/07/16 Date Check No. Paid To Memo Amount Paid 9/7/2016 3061 City Of South Burlington 104,630.68 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 9/1/2016 VI-14078 AUGUST STORMWATER 104,630.68 104,630.68 9/7/2016 3062 SoVerNet, Inc. 42.56 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 8/15/2016 VI-14069 3667074 42.56 42.56 9/7/2016 3063 USPS 4,000.00 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 9/1/2016 VI-14081 REPLENISH POSTAGE 4,000.00 4,000.00 9/7/2016 3064 Alexander J. Verret Sr. 2.00 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 8/17/2016 VI-14074 REFUND 2.00 2.00 Total Amount Paid: 564,409.54 SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ Printed: September 02, 2016 Page 2 of 2 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com MEMORANDUM TO: Kevin Dorn, City Manager South Burlington City Council FROM: Paul Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning SUBJECT: Chamberlin Neighborhood-Airport Planning Committee Follow-up DATE: September 6, 2016 City Council meeting This meeting is a follow up from the initial briefing on the Chamberlin Committee’s final report back in July. For your reference, below are links to the two final reports from the Committee (found at www.sburl.com/planning): • Chamberlin Neighborhood Land and Transportation Plan • Final Report of the Chamberlin Neighborhood-Airport Planning Noise Subcommittee Action updates since July 18: We are pleased to report progress on several of the lower-hanging fruit recommended in the reports. 1. Patchen Road bicycle lanes. Last month, the Public Works Department installed bicycle lanes along Patchen Road from White Street to the I-89 bridge, including stripping and installation of bicycle stencils. DPW was able to complete this project thanks to a sufficient road with, the Department’s newly-acquired long-line stripper, and the fact that parking was already prohibited along this street. 2. White Street / Airport Parkway crosswalk. A new north-south crosswalk at the intersection of White & Airport Parkways is being installed this month. Last week the curb was cut and handicapped ramps were installed; crosswalk markings are expected to be installed in the coming week. 3. Front Porch / front yard fencing zoning amendments. The Planning Commission received the recommendations to allow larger front porches and lower the maximum height of front-yard fences in the neighborhood. Staff was then directed to prepare the amendments, which will be presented in draft form to the Commission in September. 2 Next Steps Council items It is staff’s understanding that members of the former Chamberlin Committee will be in attendance to assist with questions the Council may have in considering the various policy actions that the reports put forward. Among those are recommendations to install bike lanes on White Street and Airport Parkway, which would require changes to the parking ordinance, as well as follow-up on the Final Report of the Noise Committee. Capital Project items The Final Reports have been shared with staff, the Bike-Ped Committee, and the Recreation & Parks Committee for their consideration as part of the City’s 10-year Capital Improvement Plan. Related: Airport Sound Mitigation Committee Last month the City received notice of the ‘first official meeting for the Burlington International Airport Sound Mitigation Committee’ from the Airport. It is slated to take place on September 14th and includes an invitation for the City of South Burlington to have seats at the table. The proposal calls for four seats to South Burlington, including the “Town [sic] Manager(s) of South Burlington or his/her designee (2)”, and “Representatives of the Chamberlain [sic] Neighborhood; City of South Burlington (2).” It is staff’s understanding that the appointment of neighborhood representatives is being left to the community to decide. The City first received a proposal from the Airport last winter for the formation of an airport-led sound committee. The CNAPC requested that the City Council not respond to the first proposal until it had had time to review and make recommendations. Those recommendations, as approved by the CNAPC at their final meeting, are included in the Final Report of the Noise Subcommittee (see link above). For ease of comparison, staff has prepared a brief side-by-side assessment of the CNAPC Noise Committee’s Final Report vs. the Airport’s Sound Committee. It is attached. Noise / Sound Committee Side by Side Comparison:CNAPC Noise Subcommittee Final Report  (June 2016) Burlington International Airport (August 2016)Purpose StatementPurpose StatementThe NS spent a great deal of its time contemplating a permanent, multi‐community (“inter‐local”)commission set up to survive the current Noise Subcommittee that would monitor and assess airportnoise, research mitigation methods, receive and report noise complaintsto BTV, educate thecommunity on noise issues, and research how other airports and surroundingstakeholdersworktogether to address airport noise. However it is formed, such a commission should be charged with serving as voice for ALL residents inan effort to work collaboratively and openly with the airport and militaryorganizations, to coordinateand confer with industry experts, to conduct meetings in a thoughtful, democratic way, and to keepthe public informed and up‐to‐date on airport developments that have the potential to affect us all. Itshould have the following characteristics:Purpose Detail (provided by the subcommittee to accompany the approved report)The purpose of the proposed Airport Noise Advisory Commission is to all interested parties an on‐going, permanent forum to address airport noise related issues to:Communicate their concerns and understand the available methods to address those concerns.Conjoin with the airport and military personnel to demonstrate the importance of  working in a positive and open fashion with the communities that  are impacted by their presence amongst us.Collaborate with other affected municipalities that experience common challenges and problems. Through a multi‐municipal approach we seek to explore ideas, responses and provide mutual support to mitigate noise and identify sources for funding when appropriate.Co‐ordinate and Confer  with technical advisers, government officials, other airports and experts in relevant fields (public health, education, audiology, sound engineering, etc.) to allow improved understanding of the impacts of  noise levels and formulate responses for near and long term planning integrating best practices in ever evolving circumstances.Conduct meetings: o   to inform the public of on‐going or up‐coming issues.o   to encourage and reinforce all military and airport personnel’s understanding of all approved operational best practices that serve to protect the community from unnecessary noise.o   to review and provide input, along with municipal staff,  to airport generated data: such as Noise Compatibility Studies, Noise Land and Re‐Use Plans, Master Vision Plan, prior to their submission to the FAA or municipal approvals.Create for the Noise Land communities a voice for all who live, work, study and travel here. That voice will serve to create better understanding among all affected parties and ensure that the future development is created in a thoughtful, democratic way.CNAPCAirport"The purpose of the Burlington International Airport (BTV) Sound Mitigation Committee, hereafter referred to as "BTV SMC", is to proactively and openly discuss the effects of sound that BTV creates on the region. An important factor to consider is the importance of air travel and the expansion of commercial air carrier operations. The partners of the airport are imperative to the operation of the airport; Heritage Aviation who provides excellent service to the general aviation community as well as exceptional service to air carrier operations  for re‐fueling, de‐icing, and maintenance on aircraft; the Air National Guard providing Rescue and Fire Fighting services for the entire  airport has" Noise / Sound Committee Side by Side Comparison:CNAPC Noise Subcommittee Final Report  (June 2016) Burlington International Airport (August 2016)CNAPCAirportStructure & MembershipStructure & Membership1. Conform to the requirements of 24 V.S.A. § 4901 and 4902 for establishingan inter‐localcommission.1. Formed by Burlington International Airport staff2. Consist of nine (9) members, three appointed by the City of South Burlington and one each fromthe Cities of Burlington and Winooski, the Town of Williston, and one representative each from BTV,VTANG, and ANG.  Total votes: 9. Quorum: 5.2. 23 members: 4 City of South Burlington, 1 each from Colchester, Essex, Essex Junction, Williston, Winooski, and City of Burlington; 4 Burlington International Airport; 2 VTANG; 1 ANG; 1 Air traffic control; 1 GBIC; 1 FBO; 1 Airline; 1 Committee Advisor3. Hold meetings no less frequently than quarterly.3. Hold meetings at least annually4. Be comprised of residents and other interested parties, particularlythose who have relevanttechnical experience.5. Chair and Vice‐Chair are Airport Director of Planning & Development and Airport Director of OperationsMission & ResponsibilitiesMission & Responsibilities5. Provide input and/or initiate action whenever changes are to be made tothe Airport Master Plan,Airport Noise Land and Re‐Use Plan, or the Airport Noise Compatibility Program.‐To continue to advocate for proactive solutions to BTV ad Community issues6. Collect technical information on noise monitoring and mitigation.[1]‐To involve the membership of the BTV SMC in the management of the Airport related community issues with at least one meeting per year7. Serve as a conduit of information between the airport and the surrounding communities. ‐To assess plans/policies and work toward change when needed8. Support open communication and transparency on all issues related to airport and military airoperations and their impacts on the public.‐To work together toward further understanding and implementation of federal, state, and local noise mitigation solutions9. Communicate with residents in a multi‐modal fashion, i.e., websites,email, leaflets, Front PorchForum, the Other Paper, RSS feeds from the S.B. website, etc. to effectively inform the public ofairport events related to noise. ‐To assess and discuss the magnitude of effects that arise when operations, policy, or strategic plans change10. Create a Shared Site link to push event notifications of BTV and VTANG/ANG to the SouthBurlington home page.11.   Other charges that may be deemed appropriate and necessary.[1] Suggestions could include that BTV seek funding and install a ground run‐up enclosure at the Pratt & Whitney FBO site, a sound wall at the southern concourse area, and blast deflectors at all taxiways north of the parking garage. Announcement First Official Burlington International Airport Sound Mitigation Committee meeting: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 5:00-7:00 PM BTV (Conference Room 1) The first official meeting for the Burlington International Airport Sound Mitigation Committee take place at BTV in Conference Room 1. The purpose is to discuss the impact of sound at the airport and on surrounding communities, as well as what potential solutions might look like. At this meeting, we will go over the scheduling of meetings for the remainder of the year, discuss research that will be taking place, and we will hear from shareholders and experts on current operations. The committee should plan on a two hour meeting with work sessions in between. Purpose Statement (Draft) The purpose of the Burlington International Airport (BTV) Sound Mitigation Committee, hereafter referred to as “BTV SMC”, is to proactively and openly discuss the effects of sound that BTV creates on the region. An important factor to consider is the importance of air travel and the expansion of commercial air carrier operations. The partners of the airport are imperative to the operation of the airport; Heritage Aviation who provides excellent service to the general aviation community as well as exceptional service to air carrier operations for re-fueling, de-icing, and maintenance on aircraft; the Air National Guard providing Rescue and Fire Fighting services for the entire airport has Committee Mission (Draft) -To continue to advocate for proactive solutions to BTV ad Community issues -To involve the membership of the BTV SMC in the management of the Airport related community issues with at least one meeting per year -To assess plans/policies and work toward change when needed -To work together toward further understanding and implementation of federal, state, and local noise mitigation solutions -To assess and discuss the magnitude of effects that arise when operations, policy, or strategic plans change Active members have included and/or may include but are not limited to: Burlington International Airport *Director of Planning and Development - Committee Chairperson *Director of Aviation - Committee Vice-Chairperson *Director of Engineering *Director of Operations Vermont Air National Guard *Two (2) Seats Appointed by General Clark Vermont Army National Guard *One (1) Appointed Seat Burlington International Airport FAA Air Traffic Control *Tower Manager or his/her designee (1) City/Town Representatives (names provided by governing agency) *City of Burlington selected by the Director of Aviation (1) *Town Manager of Colchester or his/her designee (1) *Essex Village – Town Manager or his/her designee (1) *Essex Town – Town Manager or his/her designee (1) *Town Manager (s) of South Burlington or his/her designee (2) *Representatives of Chamberlain Neighborhood; City of South Burlington (2) *Town Manager of Williston or his/her designee (1) *Mayor of Winooski or City Manager (1) *Town Manager of Colchester or his/her designee (1) GBIC Designee (1) FBO Designee (1) Airline Representative (1) Committee Advisor (1) Please contact Sound Committee Advisor, Erin Desautels at: acceleratevt@gmail.com to state your organizations wish to participate or not to participate. Any written questions or concerns should also be directed to: Erin Desautels Vermont Small Business Accelerators, LLC Burlington International Airport 1200 Airport Drive, Suite 283 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: 802-922-0495 www.acceleratevt.com