Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - 10/03/2016 CITY COUNCIL 3 OCTOBER 2016 The South Burlington City Council held a regular meeting on Monday, 3 October 2016, at 6:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. MEMBERS PRESENT: H. Riehle, Chair (via telephone); M. Emery, Acting Chair; P. Nowak, T. Chittenden, T. Barritt ALSO PRESENT: K. Dorn, City Manager; T. Hubbard, Deputy City Manager; D. Kinville, City Clerk: L. Kimball, Deputy City Clerk; Chief T. Whipple, Police Department; P. Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning; B. Nowak, O. Reinders, R. Greco, J. Hart, C. Caputo 1. Staff Recognition: Ms. Kinville noted that the Vermont Clerks and Treasurers Association annually recognizes outstanding clerks throughout the State. This year’s honoree as Assistant City Clerk of the Year is South Burlington Deputy City Clerk Laura Kimball. Ms. Kinville noted that Laura has served the City for 36 years, beginning when all entries were done by hand. Her warm manner brings a “small town atmosphere” to the Clerk’s office. Ms. Kimball thanked Ms. Kinville for nominating her and noted it has been “a quick 36 years.” Ms. Nowak said that in all the years she has been coming into the Clerk’s office in many capacities, she has never seen Laura with anything but a smile. 2. Agenda Review: Additions, deletions or changes in order of agenda items: No changes were made to the Agenda. 3. Comments & Questions from the public not related to the agenda: No issues were raised. 4. Announcements and City Manager’s Report: Council members reported on meetings and events they had recently attended. Mr. Dorn: More than 600 people attended the Fire Safety Day at the Fire Department. The security upgrade of the City Clerk’s office has been completed. Other such upgrades will follow. Mr. Dorn, Mr. Hubbard and Ms. Blanchard provided a public information session of the upcoming ballot item at the Library this past week. Ms. Blanchard also did a session for the Leadership Committee. The Steering Committee will meet this Thursday at the Police Station, 7 p.m. Staff is engaged in the second round of CIP reviews. Mr. Hubbard will represent the City at the Wednesday meeting of the VLCT Town Fair. Council members are welcome to attend this event on either Wednesday or Thursday. Recognized Mr. Conner for organizing the Leadership Workshop. Ms. Nowak commented that it was a wonderful event. It was also amazing to see how many years people have donated to the city. She noted that one idea that emerged from the session was to provide training for new members of committees. 5. Consent Agenda: a. Sign Disbursement b. Approve Minutes for 19 September 2016 c. A resolution amending the Public Art Selection Committee composition and appointing 2 members of the Design Review Committee directly to the Public Art Selection Committee d. Consider appointment of Lindsey Britt, Development Review Planner, as Assistant Zoning Administrator and Assistant Code Enforcement Officer e. Consider submittal of application to Vermont Agency of Commerce and Community Development for FY2017 Municipal Planning Grant Members agreed to delete #e from the Consent Agenda so that they can see the application. Mr. Chittenden moved to approve Consent Agenda items “a” through “d” as presented. Mr. Barritt seconded. Following a roll call vote, the motion passed unanimously. 6. City Center Update: Mr. Dorn outlined upcoming information sessions on the City Center ballot item on October 5 (Facebook), October 13 (Twitter), October 17 (City Council meeting), October 26 (Library, 6 p.m.), and November 7 (City Council meeting). There are also rack cards, space sheets, an ad in The Other Paper, and use of other social media. Progress is being made on a South Burlington Cultural Center. Tim Bardin has pulled together a lot of people in the performing arts. There is also discussion of a possible joint facility for the Library and Cultural Center. Some similar facilities exist across the country. The Library Board and Staff have been briefed on this. A site and site control are the main issues. Consultants are working on the feasibility study for the South Burlington Civic Center. Issues of revenue streams set the work a bit behind schedule. The City of Burlington has entered the discussion with its own proposed site (Memorial Auditorium and surrounding block). 7. Review and Discussion regarding Burlington International Airport Sound Mitigation Committee, Noise Compatibility Program, Home Buyout Program and related issues: Mr. Dorn noted that an Airport representative was not able to come to this meeting, but that he and Mr. Conner have information about Airport programs. Mr. Conner noted that the Airport did post information on their website, including maps. He also noted that he, Mr. Dorn, Carmine Sargent and George Maille attended the Committee meeting along with 2 City Councilors and representatives from the Air Guard, Army Guard, Air Traffic Control, FAA, and Airport. The presentations included: a. What are the generators of noise? b. Air Guard operations, including when they use afterburners c. Army Guard helicopter operations Latest information on home insulation and buyout programs (from the Airport’s consultant). The Airport advised that they had just received a $16,000,000.00 grant to complete the home buyout program and to transition to an insulation program. They also noted that the noise contours in the updated maps identified the 75db line. The most significant change resulted from the F-16s using afterburners more often. In addition, the 65db line moved further into the Chamberlin neighborhood. The Airport has been in negotiations with the FAA regarding closing down the home buyout program and transitioning to a home insulation program. There will be 39 homes in the buyout program, and that would be the end of the acquisitions. South Burlington has noted that 26 of those 39 homes are in the previous buyout zone; 13 additional homes are on the north side of Kirby Road and are in the 74-75db area which automatically qualifies them for buyout. Those 13 homes had not been previously identified. The home insulation program will not begin until the buyout program is completed because the FAA does not want both programs going at the same time. Mr. Conner noted there will be a neighborhood meeting with residents of Kirby Road and Queensbury Road next week. The Airport has decided to go ahead with an update to the Noise Compatibility Plan because there are additional programs available nationally (e.g., Voluntary Sales Assistance Program which provides federal fund to supplement a sales amount if it is below fair market value; and a Purchase Assurance Program in which a homeowner can sell a home to the Airport and the Airport can then insulate it and resell it). Mr. Conner noted that due to the moving of the 65db and 75db lines, certain parts of the neighborhood would not be eligible for home insulation. The Sound Mitigation Committee will serve as the advisory committee for the Noise Compatibility Plan update. Mr. Dorn said that if Council members want to participate in the neighborhood meeting, he would warn it for 3 or more members to attend with no City Council business to be discussed. That meeting is on Wednesday, 6:30 p.m., at City Hall. Ms. Riehle said she understands that the Kirby Cottage homes are impacted by this. These homes were to be perpetually affordable and there was federal money involved in this. She didn’t know how this would work if those homes are deemed uninhabitable. Mr. Conner confirmed that those homes are in the program and that the Airport is beginning to communicate with the home owners. Ms. Nowak said she didn’t want this to take 5 years to happen and noted that people had been very unhappy having vacant homes next to them for so long a period of time. Mr. Barritt asked how the new buyouts would affect the tax agreement with the City of Burlington. Mr. Dorn said the agreement anticipates future buyouts and addresses that issue. Mr. Chittenden asked why the buyout and insulation programs can’t run concurrently. Ms. Nowak said the Airport Commission was told that the FAA has said there can be no insulation until the buyout is completed. Ms. Emery expressed concern that offers have again been made before the City Council was informed. She would have liked the Airport Director to have briefed the Council as a common courtesy. She also questioned whether funding for insulation is dependent on there being no homes in the 75db area. Mr. Conner said he hadn’t heard that. Ms. Emery said that South Burlington has already lost a hefty number of tax dollars, and affordable housing is being chipped away. She would like the city to do some “independent investigation.” She wanted to know what the options are. Mr. Barritt felt that the Airport operates in a “vacuum,” and that the City deserves to be given information before anyone else. Ms. Nowak noted that the Airport Commission wasn’t told of this until after the City was. She said it was her understanding that some homes in the 75db area cannot have sound mitigation. She didn’t know how this would be handled. Ms. Riehle agreed that it is disconcerting that it took so long for the City to hear of this. She felt it was important to know the options so it doesn’t come down to having 2 weeks to decide. She also felt it was important for the City to have information regarding sound mitigation, specifically what happens if Chamberlin School moves into the “no mitigation” zone after the F‐35s come. She suggested putting together a list of questions for the Airport manager and the consultants. She also felt the City’s Congressional delegation should be advised of these issues, especially with regard to affordable housing. Ms. Riehle was also concerned that the Sound Mitigation Committee will be meeting only quarterly, which would make it hard to get timely information. Ms. Nowak said the Airport is open to having the Committee meet more often. Ms. Emery felt that going directly to the FAA would be in the City’s interest. Ms. Riehle also felt the communication with the Burlington City Council would be advisable. Mr. Dorn said that Mr. Richards and Mr. Longo were willing to come to a future meeting. Members felt this should be a special meeting. Mr. Dorn said he would try to match schedules for a special meeting. Ms. Greco cited the longstanding problem of getting Airport people to speak to the City Council. The City did get Mayor Weinberger and 3 or 4 Burlington City Councilors to come, and that was very beneficial. She noted the Mayor had said the home buyout program was “a mistake.” Ms. Greco questioned why it took 7 to 8 years to address the fact that the line had moved. She added that it may move even more when the F-35s arrive, and that could destroy that neighborhood. Mr. Hart, a resident of one of the Kirby Cottages said residents appreciate the Council’s concern regarding lack of transparency. He said that after the initial shock, residents have had conversations with the Airport. They were told this is a voluntary program, but if they refused to sell and noise creeps further, their homes would have no value. After reflections, residents have decided to accept the buyout before it is too late. They were also told by a developer in Virginia who has dealt with these kinds of issues that although the buyout is voluntary now, the FAA could claim their property by eminent domain. Ms. Emery suggested inviting the Mayor of Burlington to attend the special meeting. 8. Review and Discussion regarding CCRPC-sponsored feasibility study of 4 potential South Burlington Bike and Pedestrian Projects: Mr. Conner noted that Mr. Rabidoux could not attend tonight due to another scheduled meeting. Mr. Conner then advised that the City has been working with the Regional Planning Commission to analyze 4 potential bike/ped facilities as part of an effort to foster non-vehicle transportation. The 4 projects are: A. Allen Road (spear Street to Baycrest) B. Dorset Street (Old Cross Rd. to the existing path) C. Airport Parkway (from Kirby Road to Lime Kiln Road) D. Spear Street (from U.S. 2 to the existing path) Each of the projects can have different pieces; the intention is to work closely with the Bike/Ped Committee to get all the projects done as quickly/economically as possible. Mr. Conner noted that last week the city got clearance for the Hinesburg Road package to go to bid. This covers the area from the new buildings just south of Kennedy Drive to Tilley Drive. Mr. Conner then reviewed the alternatives and the preferred alternatives for each of the 4 projects. Ms. Nowak noted that some projects were easier to do than others. Mr. Barritt suggested that all the projects need not be paved, just provide a path to walk on. With regard to the Airport Parkway project, Mr. Caputo noted the Air Guard sees this as a safety hazard area and could help to fund that work. Mr. Conner then outlined the costs for each project as follows: A. Allen Road ($310,000) B. Dorset Street ($610,000) C. Airport Parkway ($2,600,000) D. Spear Street ($490,000) Mr. Conner stressed that all 4 projects have multi-purposes. Ms. Nowak suggested trying to get some collaborative help from UVM, especially on Spear Street. 9. Victim of Crime Act, Human Trafficking Grant Approval by City Council: Chief Whipple noted that Vermont got funding for this grant due to the efforts of Senator Leahy. Money is available to a Police Department, and South Burlington has been told it has been granted the right to accept the funding. This would be a statewide victim advocate position. There are 52 known victims of human trafficking in the state, mostly women serving as prostitutes in exchange for drugs. There are also labor trafficking issues. These people need immediate help (e.g., housing, substance abuse treatment, medical/dental treatment) when they are identified. The grant runs for 3.75 years starting 1 October at $67,500 for the balance of this year. It is then automatically renewable. The budget covers salary, benefits, training, travel, etc. Chief Whipple said he knows of 2 people who wish to apply, and the position will also be advertised. The Chief believed the position would fall within the City Hall Union. Ms. Nowak asked what would happen after the last year and whether the city would be asked to continue to pay for this position. Chief Whipple said he would never come to the City Council to ask South Burlington taxpayers to pay for a State program. He added that one of 4 things could happen in year 5: a. The city could take on the position (which he wouldn’t support) b. There could be other funding sources c. Other communities could contribute to funding d. The program could expire. Mr. Chittenden asked why this wasn’t a State Police program. Chief Whipple said the State Police didn’t apply. Ms. Emery moved to approve acceptance of the Human Trafficking grant as presented. Ms. Nowak seconded. In a roll call vote, the motion passed unanimously. 10. Discussion and possible action regarding extension of Amicus Curiae status relating to the plaintiff’s appeal of a Federal Court decision related to federal F‐35 NEPA litigation, Zbitnoff et al v. Deborah Lee James, 5- 14-cv-132: Mr. Dorn explained that the city was notified by the City Attorney that plaintiffs had appealed the federal court decision. The City Attorney provided options, some of which involve time limitation. He also advised that the City of Winooski has chosen not to continue the appeal to the Federal Appeals Court. Ms. Riehle said she felt there should be a public discussion on this and asked the City Attorney to outline the City’s option. There is probably some legal cost for this. Ms. Riehle noted the appeal was filed on 26 September, and a brief is due in 90 days. There is then a 7-day window for filing as amicus curiae. Ms. Nowak noted that South Burlington’s amicus was tied into the position taken by the City of Winooski, not to the “Stop the F35‐s position.” Since Winooski has decided not to join the appeal, she could not justify spending any more taxpayer money. Ms. Emery said she would prefer to table the issue and wait till after the election to decide. She felt there should be more opportunity for public input. Mr. Chittenden was concerned with spending money on something that will happen one way or the other, with or without South Burlington’s input. He preferred to focus on City Center issues. Mr. Barritt said the City took its “best shot” and he would rather not stir up the hornet’s nest again. Ms. Riehle noted that what is being appealed are not the City’s issues. She would rather spend energy on noise mitigation and the home buyout program. Public comment was then invited. Ms. Greco favored the City joining the appeal despite “negative affects” in the community. Mr. Nowak questioned what would happen if it is learned that what the coalition is stating is not true. Ms. Nowak then moved the City Council decide not to continue in the lawsuit as a plaintiff or as amicus curiae and to end the city’s participation in the lawsuit tonight. Mr. Chittenden seconded. In a roll call vote, Mr. Chittenden, Ms. Nowak, and Mr. Barritt voted in favor of the motion; Ms. Emery and Ms. Riehle voted against. The motion was deemed to have passed 3-2. 11. August Financials: Mr. Hubbard said that at 17% into the budget, revenue is at 23% and expenses at 12%. He noted that highway state aid is up. Red Rocks Park had a great year and exceeded projections. Some quarterly payments have been made. The audit is complete and will be presented on 19 December. Additional computer purchases are being made. Both sewer and stormwater are within expectations. 12. Council Guidance for FY18 Budget Preparation: Mr. Hubbard said a number of cost drivers are still being identified and will be refined more in coming weeks. Initial meetings with department heads have been held regarding the CIP. They are now $618,000 over last year’s CIP costs. A second round of meetings will be held tomorrow. The public hearing on the CIP is scheduled for the first meeting in December. The City has been putting $75,000 into the Stewardship Plan to maintain facilities. They have been told this should be $125,000. The same is true with the Sick Bank which does not now reflect what would happen if retirees took everything they were entitled to. The proposed health insurance increase is at 16% ($275,000), but progress is being made in discussions with the insurance company. This will be the third year of the 3-year contractual agreements with an increase this year of 2.75%. Good growth in the Grand List is anticipated. There are meetings scheduled regarding insurances which have been put out to bid. Based on preliminary proposals, there is an anticipated $200,000 savings. 13. Liquor Control Board: a. Halyard Brewing Co, LLC (first class) Mr. Chittenden moved the Council convene as Liquor Control Board. Mr. Barritt seconded. Motion passed unanimously by roll call vote. Mr. Chittenden moved to approve the first class license for Halyard Brewing Co, LLC, as presented. Ms. Nowak seconded. By roll call vote, the motion passed unanimously. Mr. Chittenden moved to reconvene as City Council. Ms. Nowak seconded. By roll call vote, the motion passed unanimously. 14. Other Business: A. Items Held from Consent Agenda No items were held. Ms. Nowak noted that the signs for City Council support of the bond issue will be 2-sided, with one color on yellow. The cost is $3.40 each for 100. Members can decide where to put them. Ms. Emery asked about having young people involved in city committees. Ms. Nowak suggested contacting committee chairs. Ms. Riehle said this would involve training and a process for applying. She will work with Mr. Conner on contacting committee chairs. As there was no further business to come before the Council, Mr. Barritt moved to adjourn. Ms. Nowak seconded. By roll call vote, the motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 10:10 p.m. Published by ClerkBase ©2019 by Clerkbase. No Claim to Original Government Works. South Burlington Water Dept. Accounts Payable Check Register Date: 10/04/16 Date Check No. Paid To Memo Amount Paid 10/4/2016 3071 South Burlington Ace 18.80 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 8/23/2016 VI-14095 793815/3 15.60 15.60 9/19/2016 VI-14102 794443/3 3.20 3.20 10/4/2016 3072 Adam Davis 87.54 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 9/16/2016 VI-14101 REFUND 87.54 87.54 10/4/2016 3073 E.J. Prescott, Inc. 887.20 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 9/13/2016 VI-14093 5142095 383.36 383.36 9/2/2016 VI-14094 5138193 157.13 157.13 9/12/2016 VI-14098 5141687 175.83 175.83 9/19/2016 VI-14103 5145145 117.50 117.50 9/19/2016 VI-14104 5145092 53.38 53.38 10/4/2016 3074 Clement Looby 107.85 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 9/16/2016 VI-14099 REFUND 107.85 107.85 10/4/2016 3075 Robert Sharpe 165.74 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 9/16/2016 VI-14100 REFUND 165.74 165.74 10/4/2016 3076 SoVerNet, Inc. 44.22 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 9/15/2016 VI-14105 3677450 44.22 44.22 10/4/2016 3077 Stiles Company Inc. 1,881.50 Date Voucher Number Reference Voucher Total Amount Paid 9/8/2016 VI-14096 225434 946.30 946.30 9/7/2016 VI-14097 225372 935.20 935.20 Printed: September 28, 2016 Page 1 of 2 South Burlington Water Dept. Accounts Payable Check Register Date: 10/04/16 Date Check No. Paid To Memo Amount Paid Total Amount Paid: 3,192.85 SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________ Printed: September 28, 2016 Page 2 of 2 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com MEMORANDUM TO: Kevin Dorn, City Manager South Burlington City Council FROM: Paul Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning SUBJECT: Appointment of Lindsey Britt as Assistant Zoning Administrator and Assistant Code Enforcement Officer DATE: October 3, 2016 City Council meeting Staff is requesting authority for Lindsey Britt, Development Review Planner to serve as an Assistant Zoning Administrator and Assistance Code Enforcement Officer. Raymond Belair serves as our Zoning Administrator and Code Enforcement Officer, and Cathyann LaRose, City Planner, is authorized as an assistant for both. Lindsey Britt joined the City in March 2016 as our Development Review Planner. In order to allow for certain timely permits (house sales, etc.) to be able to proceed without delay and to assure the highest possible level of customer service to our residents and businesses, staff is respectfully requesting that Lindsey be granted authority to issue permits and perform the other associated functions. This will enhance the Department’s capacity for customer service. Proposed Action: Appointment of Lindsey Britt as Assistant Zoning Administrator pursuant to the City Charter, Chapter 13, Section 301(2) and as Assistant Code Officer, both effective until the next annual appointments. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com MEMORANDUM TO: Kevin Dorn, City Manager South Burlington City Council FROM: Paul Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning SUBJECT: Consideration of Municipal Planning Grant application submittal DATE: October 3, 2016 City Council meeting Background The State Agency of Commerce and Community Development has made available funding for towns and cities to undertake planning activities again this year. The maximum grant award for a single municipality has increased to $20,000. As with last year, any grant over $8,000 must include a local cash match of 50% for the amount above that figure. Staff expects the application field to be competitive but believes we also have a good chance to succeed. The State awards these grants based on a series of competitive criteria. Those include: application quality, work plan & budget, linkage to comprehensive plan, citizen participation, statewide priorities, and bonus points for projects related to neighborhood development areas, of which we have one. Project Proposal The proposal is to use the MPG funds to support Phase II of the City’s “Planned Unit Development” regulations. The City completed Phase I of this project this past summer (using MPG funds). Phase I included the analysis and identification of nine potential Planned Unit Development types in the City, or models for how larger projects could be reviewed and approved for different circumstances – rural, business park, mixed residential & local commercial, infill development, commercial areas, etc. An overhaul of these “overarching” standards for larger properties has been one of the consistent themes in the discussion surrounding the impetus for a period of Interim Zoning was the need to address the planning for medium to large size lots, with substantial agreement that the current regulations for subdivisions, PUDs, and master planning are not implementing the Comprehensive Plan or the vision held by the City. 2 Phase II of this project is proposed to advance four of these PUD to language in our Land Development Regulations, and includes regular work sessions with the Planning Commission, multiple meetings with property owners, and public outreach. For the purposes of this Municipal Planning Grant, the City would be committing to $6,000 in local match to the $20,000 grant. These funds have already been identified in the FY 2017 budget. The total project will likely be somewhere larger and will be assessed and finalized in concert with the department budget. Proposed Action: Approval of the submittal of a Municipal Planning Grant application, for up to $20,000 in grant funds plus at least $6,000 in local match, for the work described above. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com MEMORANDUM TO: Kevin Dorn, City Manager South Burlington City Council FROM: Paul Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning Justin Rabidoux, Director of Public Works SUBJECT: CCRPC Multi-Site Bike/Ped Feasibility Study Results DATE: October 3, 2016 City Council meeting Enclosed please find the results of a recently-completed Feasibility Study for four potential bicycle- pedestrian projects in our community. They are: • Allen Road immediately west of Spear Street • Dorset Street from Sadie Lane to Nowland Farm Road • Airport Parkway from Kirby Road to Lime Kiln Road • Spear Street near Gutterson Field House and the judghandle For the past year, the City, through a partnership and funding from the Chittenden Country Regional Planning Commission and their consultant, Toole Design Group, has assessed the feasibility and potential alternatives associated with these four potential projects. Project Summary In January 2014, the City Council, upon recommendation from the Planning Commission and staff, submitted a request to the CCRPC to include an analysis of these four potential bike-ped projects in its follow year work plan. The sites themselves were selected based on priorities and needs identified by the Bike Ped Committee and staff. The study was approved the following spring and work began in the spring of 2015 to study these four sites. A project team of staff from the Department of Public Works, Planning & Zoning, the CCRPC, and Local Motion was assembled to provide technical feedback to the consultants. Over the course of the winter, the technical team reviewed multiple options and alternatives for feasibility, cost, and general design alternatives. In May of 2016, a public information meeting and discussion was held before the Planning Commission at which feedback from the was gathered. Several members of the bike-ped committee were in attendance. Last month, the results and recommendations for preferred alternatives were presented to the Planning Commission for their consideration, and the preferred alternatives were approved. Again at this meeting, several members of the bike-ped committee were in attendance. The completion of this feasibility study positions the City well to consider applying for construction funding and/or to move forward with in-house design and construction as appropriate. South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyStudy Areas | South Burlington, VTPedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Feasibility Study South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyPurpose:‡Evaluate and identify the walking and bicycling alternatives for developing a safe route for the four study areas:‡Allen Road (from Spear Street to the existing path east of Baycrest Drive)‡Dorset Street (from existing Recreation Path from Old Cross Road to the existing path north of Autumn Hill Road)‡Airport Parkway (from Kirby Road to Lime Kiln Bridge)‡Spear Street (from US Route 2 to the existing South Burlington Recreation Path)Purpose & Need | South Burlington, VTPedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Feasibility Study South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyNeed:‡Create a preferred alternative for walking and bicycling for the four study areas.‡Maximize safety for users walking and bicycling in this corridor.‡Support future walking and bicycling connections in the City of South Burlington.‡To provide a preferred alternative with opinion of probable construction costs to serve as a basis for the City to apply for grant applications.Purpose & Need | South Burlington, VTPedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Feasibility Study South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyAllen Road | Preferred Alternative South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyAllen Road | Preferred Alternative South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyDorset Street | Preferred Alternative South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyDorset Street | Preferred Alternative South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyDorset Street | Preferred Alternative South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyDorset Street | Preferred Alternative South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyAirport Parkway | Conceptual Alternative 1 South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyAirport Parkway | Conceptual Alternative 2 South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyAirport Parkway | Preferred Alternative South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyAirport Parkway | Preferred Alternative South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyAirport Parkway | Preferred Alternative South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyAirport Parkway | Preferred Alternative South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyAirport Parkway | Preferred Alternative South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyAirport Parkway | Preferred Alternative South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyAirport Parkway | Preferred Alternative South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudySpear Street | Conceptual AlternativesAlternative 1‡6’ sidewalk on east side adjacent to the road with 6” curb and 10’ shared use path from US Route 2 to PFG Road (UVM Campus).Alternative 2‡6’ sidewalk on east side with 7’ buffer and 10’ shared use path from US Route 2 to PFG Road (UVM Campus). Alternative 3‡Alternative 3: 8’-11’ shared use path on the west side from US Route 2 to S Burlington Recreation Path. South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudySpear Street | Preferred Alternative South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudySpear Street | Preferred Alternative South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudySpear Street | Preferred Alternative South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyAllen Road | Preferred AlternativeOpinion of Probable Construction CostsAllen RoadPreferred Alternative (Outside of Right-of-Way)*Estimated Project Total*Note:Assume $10,000 per parcel. $310,000DorsetStreetPreferred AlternativeEstimated Project Total$610,000Airport Parkway/Lime Kiln RoadPreferred AlternativeEstimated Project Total*Note:Assume $10,000 per parcel. $2,600,000Spear StreetPreferred AlternativeEstimated Project Total$490,000 South Burlington Bicycle and Pedestrian Feasibility StudyNext Steps‡Kick-off Meeting/Existing Conditions‡Develop Conceptual Alternatives‡Concept Alternatives Presentation‡Prepare Draft Final Report‡Preferred Alternatives Presentation‡Prepare Final ReportSouth Burlington, VTPedestrian and Bicycle Feasibility Study 19 Gregory Drive, Suite 1, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Dispatch: 846-4111(Fax 846-4102) • Records 846-4160 (Fax 846-4204) • Administration 846-4165 (Fax 846-4205) Trevor S. Whipple, Chief of Police SOUTH BURLINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT To: South Burlington City Councilors From: Trevor S. Whipple, Chief of Police Date: September 29, 2016 Re: Request to accept Human Trafficking Case Manager grant Attached please find a grant request for a new position of Human Trafficking Case Manager. This grant opportunity was announced with a very short turnaround time. Deputy City Manager Tom Hubbard agreed to have me explore the opportunity. Specifically it calls for a case manager to cover cases throughout Vermont. Requirements were that the applicant was a law enforcement agency with Human Trafficking case experience. The South Burlington Police Department is a leader in the investigation of Human Trafficking cases in Vermont. I have been an active member of the Vermont Human Trafficking Task Force steering committee and the Law Enforcement subcommittee since their inception. When this grant opportunity was announced I was encouraged, by task force partners, to submit an application. SBPD was felt to be the most likely host for this new position due to our experience, leadership and location. Currently there is no central source to manage cases or to coordinate victim services for the very unique needs of Human Trafficking victims. SBPD has a solid reputation of working closely with state and federal prosecutors, as well as victim advocates. A letter of intent was due on September 16 followed by the actual grant request on September 28. I was notified on September 29 that our grant request was approved. In brief, this grant will provide the funding required for the salary, benefits, travel, and training for the remainder of FY17, $67,500. The grant will automatically be renewed at the level of $90,000 for FY18, FY19 and FY20. This amount will continue to fully fund the position through FY20. If approved, I will immediately accept this grant offer and begin the process of hiring a properly qualified person to fill the new role of Human Trafficking Case Manager. Being able to provide direct service to victims of Human Trafficking will add a level of support not currently available. Victims of sex and labor trafficking require immediate and ongoing assistance and will benefit from a well-trained case manager. There is no requirement to retain this position at the conclusion of FY20. During FY20 we will evaluate the position and funding sources to determine if it should continue. I appreciate your consideration and hope that you will approve accepting this grant in the furtherance of our service to Human Trafficking victims.