Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - 12/21/2015 CITY COUNCIL 21 DECEMBER 2015 The South Burlington City Council held a regular meeting on Monday, 21 December 2015, at 6:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. MEMBERS PRESENT: P. Nowak, Chair; H. Riehle, C. Shaw, M. Emery, T. Chittenden ALSO PRESENT: K. Dorn, City Manager; T. Hubbard, Deputy City Manager; J. Barlow, City Attorney; P. Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning; C. LaRose, City Planner; Chief D. Brent, Fire Department; P. Edwards, Operations Officer, Police Department; J. Rabidoux, Public Works Director; J. Louisos, T. Harrington, A. Klugo, D. MacDonald, S. Quest, Planning Commission; D. Leban, S. Dopp, L. Parker, G. Sheller, M. Simoneau, T McKenzie, R. Smith, B. Nowak, S. Dooley, B. Bull 1. Agenda Review: Additions, deletions or changes in order of agenda items: No changes were made to the Agenda. 2. Comments & Questions from the public not related to the agenda: A member of the audience noted that the South Burlington Community Watch Group is now going public. The City Council was invited to join the effort. Ms. Sheller asked the Council to postpone items 7, 10 and 11 because of the holidays when a lot of people can’t participate. Ms. Nowak noted that in some of those items there are time constraints and deadlines that must be adhered to. Mr. Parker noted that there are covenants relating to the properties where he lives that prohibit the spraying of pesticides. The property to the south of them has indicated they will be growing corn and will be spraying pesticides. Mr. Parker said they are very concerned with this. Ms. Nowak said this will be looked into. 3. Announcements and City Manager’s Report: Mr. Dorn: Noted that the Regional Planning Commission is discussing Bill H249 which would allow shared services under the RPC. A City Managers’ lunch was hosted by the RPC with good conversation regarding the possible legalization of marijuana. The white house at Wheeler Park has been torn down and some dead trees cleared out. Mr. Dorn praised the efforts of Public Works for this. A dinner for seniors was held on Friday night by the Recreation Department and the Recreation and Leisure Arts Committee, sponsored by MVP. 50 seniors attended and were served by students from the High School. Council members reported on meetings and events they had attended. 4. Consent Agenda: a. Sign Disbursement b. Approve Minutes for Joint Meeting of 12 November, Council Meeting of 7 December, and Special Council meeting of 15 December 2015 Mr. Shaw moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Land Development Regulations and Official Map Public Hearing, and presentation from Planning Commission: Ms. Emery moved to open the public hearing. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Ms. Louisos provided a brief overview of the LDRs and noted there was considerable public outreach and a legal review. The outreach process included input from various committees (e.g., Form Based Codes Committee, Interim Zoning committees, etc.), stormwater consultants, and the general public. With regard to the new stormwater standards, Ms. Louisos noted the Commission tried to make them seamless with State standards. The City Center/Form Based Code area comprises a large part of the LDRs and replaces the “Central Districts.” Zoning under Form Based Code puts more focus on the “form” of a building and its relationship to the street. The LDRs also include a different means of calculating open space, resulting in a higher quality of open space. Ms. Louisos noted that the Commission wrestled with how to deal with block standards. She directed attention to a map on p. 370 which resulted from Commission discussions. It shows the layout of the Form Based Code area. Form Based Code is very “black and white,” which allows for a largely administrative review process. Larger projects can have a public meeting as well. Ms. Louisos said that the Affordable Housing Committee and later Sub-Committee did a significant amount of work. The LDRs do propose an “inclusionary zoning” element, which would be required for a project of more than 12 housing units. 15% of those units must meet affordability standards. Ms. Louisos noted that both the City of Burlington and the Town of Hinesburg have similar requirements. There is also a requirement for “stretch energy compliance.” This will be required for all Act 250 hearings as well. Mr. Conner said the best place to research this information is in the State building handbook. Ms. Louisos noted that questions have arisen regarding Form Based Code and the possibility of an “innovative” design. The Commission has now begun to discuss the possibility of “master planning,” so there can be deviation from the code when there is something creative proposed. Mr. Conner then provided an overview of the Official City Map and explained what happens when a developer wants to develop in an area where there is some public infrastructure on the Official City Map. Ms. Nowak questioned whether the road which is shown going through the Marcotte School property could reduce the value of that property and asked whether the School Board has commented on this. Mr. Conner noted that the Williston Road study is looking at what kind of transportation systems will be needed for the future. One system was a “regular street development pattern.” There was also feedback from multiple parties as to how important it was for Williston Road to have connections into City Center. There are also studies regarding regular block sizes, which increases property values. Mr. Conner added that the School Board did express some concern with the street through the school property; however, it has been on the Official City Map for a long time and there is nothing that requires the School Board to do anything at this time. Ms. Nowak then asked if there was any public comment. Mr. McKenzie of South Burlington Realty, one of the major property owners in City Center, explained a dilemma that the new LDRs have given rise to. Under the existing code, development is limited by such things as coverage, density, parking, etc. Under the Form Based Code, there is a required level of development (e.g., 70% of street frontage must be covered). The challenge is a “proportionality problem.” They can’t meet the code without the certainty of structured parking. Mr. McKenzie provided examples of what would be required in the way of parking for the level of development that must occur under the Form Based Code. The more land that has to be taken up by a building, the less space there is for the parking that would be needed. The other alternative is to bring down the building height, which defeats the intent of City Center. Mr. McKenzie noted that the extent of this problem was not discovered until late in the process when South Burlington Realty began to do some master planning. Mr. Shaw asked if a parking garage could be put on the Official City Map. Mr. Conner said it can, but you must identify on which piece of property it is to go (though not necessarily where on that property). Ms. Louisos said this came to the Commission at one of the public hearings, and the Commission will be looking at it to see if there is a need to make future changes. Mr. McKenzie added that the goal is to create an “urban core.” He didn’t think they want to be looking at lower buildings with wider footprints. Mr. Shaw asked if Form Based Code presents a risk if it is passed as it is at this point. Mr. Conner said Form Based Code places emphasis on a more urban environment. The code requires buildings to be along streets; there can’t be parking in the first 80 feet back from the street. Mr. Conner added that the Planning Commission did prioritize a Form Based Code master planning tool to work on in the next few months. He also said that the question of “height vs. breadth” is a very interesting one, and one which the Commission is interested in pursuing. Mr. McKenzie said all of their consultants are available to help in any discussions. Ms. Crocker asked the Council to reconsider having the Swift Street Extension on the Official City Map. Mr. Conner noted that the property in that area is currently zoned as Industrial-Open Space. In the draft plan, that property could become more transitional, with less development near the residential area. There was no further public input. Ms. Emery moved to close the public hearing. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Dorn suggested the Council schedule another meeting to continue consideration of the LDRs. Ms. Nowak suggested the second meeting in January (19th). Mr. Conner noted that if the Council takes no action within 150 days, the city would revert back to the old regulations. 6. Continuation of Council discussion regarding draft South Burlington Comprehensive Plan and possible warning of second City Council Public hearing on South Burlington Comprehensive Plan: Ms. LaRose reviewed the changes made by staff at the request of the City Council at the Special Meeting. These included: language regarding Form Based Code, adding “or enhance” to the Vision/Goals statement at the beginning of the Plan, provided three options regarding strategies for affordable housing, and incorporated Ms. Kochman’s comments. Ms. Nowak expressed concern with any language that attempts to define “family” and didn’t know what “a precise household” might mean. Ms. Dooley suggested just using “household definition regulations.” After a brief discussion, members agreed to option #2, eliminating the words “strict and precise” and the word “family.” Ms. LaRose noted staff has not yet come up with language regarding a “recharge” area or “quality of life” in relation to transportation. Ms. Emery will continue to work with staff on the latter. Mr. Dorn said staff can have something available for 4 January. Mr. Dorn then asked members of departments concerned with public safety to speak regarding the issue of the Swift Street Extension. Chief Brent noted that each time a project is proposed, the First Department is asked to comment on its ability to provide fire protection. The Chief stressed that their comments regarding development on Hinesburg Road have been based on the premise that there will be a connection from Swift Street to Hinesburg Road. The Chief noted that when the bridge to Queen City Park was closed, a whole part of the city was closed to emergency services, and the same thing could happen in this area if there were to be a major occurrence. And, as the area continues to expand, there are more people to bring services to. Mr. Rabidoux then explained that Public Works view road connections from the point of view of connectivity and the delivery of basic services. He felt these types of road connections should be considered in all land use planning. People shouldn’t have to “hop back” onto a main road to get places. Mr. Rabidoux said that South Burlington is lacking in east-west connections, which will continue to put pressure on main streets which are already overburdened. There are no options from Swift Street down to the Shelburne Rd. carwash. In addition, having these connections provides air quality benefits…air quality is a problem with “stopped cars,” not with moving cars. Mr. Rabidoux stressed that connector streets can be designed properly (he cited Songbird as an example of this). He also noted that the State will not be making improvements to the Interstate for at least 20 years, and there is a need for more options. Officer Edwards then advised that everything the Police Department reviews they look at for the long term. A lot of things in the city have been planned based on future east-west (Swift Street) continuation. He cited the need to respond to emergencies and not being “painted into a corner.” He said the Swift St. Extension doesn’t have to be a Kennedy Drive, but it has to be planned for. He added there would have been a different discussion regarding development if there hadn’t been the confidence that the road would be there in the future. Mr. Conner said one question is whether the city wants some smaller connections or have the major roads widened to four lanes. He said that one function the Planning Department has is to talk with realtors and potential home buyers about what might be happening near them. Chief Brent said he has explained to the DRB that once the Fire Department has laid hose on the road, all traffic is sent back to go in another direction. Even another ambulance cannot get past that point. Members of the Council were then polled as to where their thinking was regarding keeping the road on the Official Map. Ms. Emery said it should be kept with the assurance that there would be attention paid to slowing traffic. Mr. Shaw affirmed the Planning Commission’s role in determining the need for this to be on the map. Ms. Riehle agreed but would support more assurance in the Plan that things other than traffic would be studied. Ms. Nowak felt it should be kept on the Official Map and noted that Act 250 will require attention to environmental concerns. Mr. Chittenden wouldn’t take it off the Official Map but would support traffic calming and extensive review. 7. FY15 Audit Presentation: Mr. Smith said the fiscal year ending 30 June 2015 ended with a balance of $750,000. Last year, this balance was about $520,000. He attributed the additional money to more revenues from fire inspection fees ($300,000 over the estimate) and to unexpended budget items ($400,000) which helped mitigate areas of shortfall. Mr. Smith said the city still has some work to do, but this has been a good step in the right direction. He would like to see about $1,600,000 in the reserve/surplus, which would cover about 30 days of expenses at the minimum. Mr. Smith suggested writing off about $200,000 of emergency services deficit (long term) and then not spend what is not taken in. Mr. Chittenden asked if the city should be exploring municipal trash collection. Mr. Smith said other communities are asking the same question. He felt it would be a worthwhile conversation. 8. Approve resolution establishing fees under the Electrical Safety Ordinance: Chief Brent said the fees are exactly the same as those charged by the State. An Electrical Inspector has been hired and has done all the State has asked him to do. The State has more than 3,000 unclosed permits in South Burlington which they will close out. They will not be the city’s responsibility. Ms. Emery moved to approve the resolution establishing fees under the Electrical Safety Ordinance. Mr. Chittenden seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. Discussion of 6 December 2011 special city meeting vote authorizing City Council to convey a conservation easement on Wheeler Nature Park. Possible Executive Session to consider confidential attorney-client communications made for the purpose of providing professional legal services to the City Council: Mr. Barlow gave members a copy of the 2011 ballot language. He said that in his opinion the City Council has been authorized to convey this conservation easement, and the Council can do so under the law. The Council has the authority to create the terms and scope of the conservation easement. The Council would have 5to find an easement holder who would agree to those terms. Mr. Barlow stressed that it is the Legislative Body (i.e., the City Council) that has the authority to determine what to do with city-owned land. Ms. Nowak asked if the city could retain the right to use some of that property for uses that do not denigrate the property. Mr. Barlow said yes. Mr. Chittenden suggested one use might be to sugar the trees for educational purposes. Ms. Riehle said the challenge is that the public didn’t understand they couldn’t make the decision as to what became of the property. Ms. Nowak noted that only 8-1/2% of the people voted in that election, and 69% of those voted for the ballot item (about 1020 people). She added that she wanted to believe the city can be great stewards for the land, and stressed that nobody on the Council is opposed to conserving the land. Ms. Dooley recalled former City Manager Hafter telling people the Council at the time that the city did not have to take a vote regarding putting a police station on that land; they could just have changed the zoning. The Council at the time agreed to abide by the vote of the public. Ms. Dooley also felt the Vermont Land Trust was the best expert on what a conservation easement should include. She was sure it could include agricultural purpose use. Mr. Mittag said he was sure public events could be held in the open space. Ms. Bull asked if Red Rocks Park has a perpetual conservation easement. Mr. Hubbard said it does not because it was purchased with federal money to be conserved. If at any point it was to be developed, the city would have to find another piece of land to conserve. Mr. Hubbard also believed there is a plan to seek a permanent conservation easement on Red Rocks Park. Mr. Simoneau said the area in question is a tremendous asset to the community, and if there is some good use the community can make of the land, it is even more of an asset. Mr. Dorn suggested convening the Natural Resources Committee and asking them to come with some recommendations, possibly in conjunction with the Recreation and Leisure Arts Committee. 10. Continued Consideration and possible adoption of Land Development Regulations (Article IX – SEQ District and establishment of SEQ‐NRN District on the Official City Map) and Official Map (remove a small area on the Wheeler Nature Park from the designation of “existing park and open space”: Mr. Chittenden moved to adopt the following amendments to the Land Development Regulations as presented: Article IX- Southeast Quadrant and the Official City Map – establishment of SEQ‐NRN District on land presently zoned as Parks and Recreation, and to adopt the following amendment to the Official Map: removal of a small area on the Wheeler Nature Park from the designation of “existing park and open space.” Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed 4-1 with Mr. Shaw opposing. 11. Energy Committee Report and PACE: Mr. Epstein indicated a letter the Committee wishes to send to the Public Service Board and asked for permission to do so. Ms. Riehle suggested adding: “with full support of the City Council” to the letter. Ms. Riehle then moved to authorize the Energy Committee to send a letter to the Public Service Board and to include the Council’s full support. Mr. Chittenden seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Epstein said they will come back to the Council meeting in January with a full report. Council members then agreed to continue meeting past 11 p.m. 12. November financials, Overview of FY 17 Draft Budget and Errors and Omissions Report: Mr. Hubbard reviewed the Errors and Omissions which must be approved by the Council and then sent to the State. Mr. Shaw moved to accept the Errors and Omission as submitted by the Tax Assessor as of 21 December 2015. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Hubbard said staff continues to watch overtime in a few departments, some of which are overspent. The note on the Quint (fire engine) has been paid off. Most of the FHY16 vehicle replacements have been made. Mr. Hubbard noted the city is fortunate to be able to extend the constructions season due to the good weather. Mr. Hubbard then advised that the draft budget is at 2.98%. Department managers will come in at the first meeting in January. The proposed budget will meet all of the city’s obligations. One of the major increases is in the area of the pension as the city tries to balance good/bad years. The other unpredictable are the insurances. Ms. Nowak suggested the possibility of an RFP on some of the insurances next year. 13. Other Business: a. Items Held from the Consent Agenda: No items were held. Mr. Shaw asked what it would take to get a parking garage under the TIF. Mr Dorn said there would be negotiations. He noted that an upcoming ballot will probably include votes on Dumont Park, Market Street and a Community Library. He acknowledged there can be a risk, but you try to mitigate that with good negotiations. Ms. Riehle said it would help if there were a City Council agreement/consensus that the Council is committed to working with developers to make that part of a master plan. Mr. Dorn offered to begin discussions as to how to move forward to get this done. As there was no further business to come before the Council, Mr. Chittenden moved to adjourn. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 11:16 p.m. Published by ClerkBase ©2019 by Clerkbase. No Claim to Original Government Works. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL    15 DECEMBER 2015         The South Burlington City Council held a special meeting on Tuesday, 15 December                                2015, at 6:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street.  MEMBERS PRESENT: P. Nowak, Chair; H. Riehle, C. Shaw, M. Emery, T. Chittenden  ALSO PRESENT: K. Dorn, City Manager; T. Hubbard, Deputy City Manager; C. LaRose, City  Planning; J. Louisos, T. Harrington, A. Klugo, S. Quest, Planning Commission; M. Simoneau, S.  Dopp, E. J. Necrason, G. Shelerin, A. Crocker, D. Leban, G. Sproul, J. Kockman, W. Nadeau, T.  Papp, P. St. James  1. Agenda Review: Additions, deletions or changes in order of agenda items:  No changes were made to the Agenda.  2. South Burlington Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing:  Mr. Shaw moved to open the public hearing.  Ms. Riehle seconded.  Motion passed  unanimously.  Ms. Louisos noted that there was a quorum of the Planning Commission present and that no  business of that Commission would take place.  Public comment then followed:  Mr. Necrason: Regarding east west roads, he felt that roads shouldn’t be on the official map  without further investigation.  He questioned whether if a developer develops that land he  would have to build the road.  Ms. LaRose explained that there is a state process by which a  developer is compensated for a public amenity and that being on the map doesn’t mean the  road has to be built or that it won’t be built.  Mr. Necrason asked for the statute to research  this.  He also asked to see any RFP that might be done if a consultant is hired to do a study  relating to the Swift Street Extension.  He felt that any study should include a new  environmental assessment, wildlife inventory, and traffic study.  Ms. Nowak asked that specific comments be provided to the Council and/or City Manager in  writing.  Ms. Shelerin: Was concerned with “so many wheels spinning” with things being handled by  various groups and going very fast.  Ms. Nowak explained that there are some deadlines,  particularly a March deadline for approval of a revised Comprehensive Plan.  Ms. Shelerin  expressed concern with the extension of Swift Street.  SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL  15 DECEMBER 2015  PAGE 2    Ms. Crocker: Asked that the description of Wheeler Nature Park on p. 2‐31 be changed to  read: “….intended to be conserved in perpetuity.”  With regard to Swift Street Extension, she  noted there are people on both sides of the issue.  Her concern is that there are private  developers in discussion now for developments that would require that road to be built.  She  questioned whether that road is on the map just to make development happen.  Ms. LaRose  explained that the official map doesn’t mandate a road be built or not.  Even if it were not on  the map, the DRB could require it to be built.  At the DRB level, a road is reviewed at a “micro  level” for the impact it has as a benefit or as a burden.  A complete study would include such  things as how much further an ambulance would have to travel to reach certain areas of the  city or how much further people have to travel between neighborhoods, etc.  Ms. Louisos  noted that the Planning Commission did include a strategy to redo some of the earlier studies.   Mr. Shaw noted that Section 3‐36/37 has the rationale for that road.  Ms. LaRose added that  section 2‐66 specifically references Swift Street Extension.  Ms. Crocker asked to add to the  strategy on p. 2‐63 “…and expand the analysis to include environmental impact.”  She also  asked to “soften” the language on p. 2‐68 which reads: “…long been identified as an important  east‐west connector.”  She felt the stated purposes of the road may not be appropriate now.    Ms. Kochman: Felt the Plan is a “magnificent document.”  Asked that some items suggested by  the Recreation and Leisure Arts Committee to included.    Ms. Leban: Cited the difficulty of balancing two “conflicting goods,” namely an efficient  transportation system and conservation of resources.  She also noted that traffic also  contributes to air quality issues.  She felt that any study of Swift Street Extension should by  more than a traffic planner.  She felt it would require a very expensive bridge to cross the  wetland; otherwise a road would have to go around, which would involve taking land from  Wheeler Nature Park.  Ms. Leban also cited the need for a rec path from Butler Farms to  Veterans Park and the need to adopt a “model lighting ordinance” to give clear direction to  developers and to make it easier for the city to maintain lighting in the future.    Mr. Simoneau:  Noted that when Dorset Farms was being marketed, the road was already part  of the official map.  He said it was put there because people looked to the future.  Today, it  would be required as a secondary access.  He suggested keeping it on the map, though he  shares the concerns with such a road.  He felt it is prudent to look at the big picture and felt  there should be a study before any road happens.  SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL  15 DECEMBER 2015  PAGE 3    Mr. Nadeau: Asked who would initiate a study of Swift St. Extension.  Mr. Dorn said it is not  known what Act 250 would require.  Ms. LaRose said that in a project of more than 9 units, an  Act 250 review is required by the state and Army Corps of Engineers.      Mr. Papp: They are building a home in Butler Farms.  He noted a development in Re  Meadow with a “straight shot” road.”  He felt this will become a “drag strip.”  He felt if there  isn’t going to be a Swift St. Extension, that other road could be made more “winding.”    Ms. Dopp: Noted that ideas on road widths have changed as have environmental issues.   She felt the city shouldn’t necessarily adhere to a standard that was in vogue years ago.    Mr. St. James: Felt the quality of life for people in the Village at Dorset Park should be the #1  consideration.  He cited the issue of people closest to the proposed Extension being able to  open their windows in warmer weather.    Ms. Harrington: There are a lot of unknowns.  She added that there is a process that takes  into account impacts on wildlife, archeology, etc.    There was no further public comment.    Mr. Shaw moved to close the public hearing.  Ms. Emery seconded.  Motion passed  unanimously.    3. City Council Work Session on Comprehensive Plan:    Mr. Shaw expressed concern that there are only 2 mentions of Form Based Code in the Plan.   He suggested a general discussion including what it means for City Center and a map with the  Form Based Code area.    Ms. LaRose noted that the Council can make changes before they warn a second public hearing.   Any changes have to go back to the Planning Commission so they can attest that they are in  accordance with state law.  Mr. Dorn added that there needs to be consensus on any changes.      SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL  15 DECEMBER 2015  PAGE 4    Mr. Chittenden asked that under 1‐1, Vision and Goals, under the second bullet under  Affordable and Community Strong, instead of ‘maintain’ it read ‘maintain or improve (or  enhance).’      Ms. Nowak was uncomfortable with the use of the word “implement” under housing strategy  #4 on p. 216.  She felt the city was not at the “implement” stage for some of these items.  She  was particularly concerned with the section of “family definition.”  Ms. LaRose said staff can put  together some other language for this.  Mr. Klugo suggested something like: “…foster  innovative approaches which may include….”  Ms. Nowak asked that the City Attorney look at  the “family definition” language.    Ms. Riehle raised the question of appropriate language regarding aquifers on p. 2‐86.  She  noted that for some homes, there is not place they would get water if there were to be  development that affected aquifers.    Ms. Nowak commented that the use of “forceful” words can imply that the city will do these  things, and there may be things which the city cannot afford or hasn’t the time to do.    Ms. Emery asked about the language regarding Wheeler Nature Park and conservation in  perpetuity.  Mr. Dorn said the City Attorney will have an opinion on what that vote meant.   Members agreed to wait for that opinion.    In Sections 2‐52 and 2‐65, members agreed to add language relating to “noise” and “air quality”  to the list of things related to quality of life.  Ms. Emery asked for a specific objective addressing  noise and air quality.  Ms. Emery and Ms. LaRose will get together to work on that language.    Members then reviewed public comments as follows:    They agreed to accept Ms. Kochman’s comments.    Regarding comments from the Energy Committee, specifically the removal of “where  appropriate,” Mr. Dorn noted that the City Council wants a say on where solar installations are.   If you take out the “where appropriate,” the opportunity for that input can be lost.  Ms. Louisos  said the Planning Commission discussed this and felt it was important that the Public Service   SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL  15 DECEMBER 2015  PAGE 5    Board doesn’t get to page 1 and say, “They’re all for it.”  It was noted that there are places in  the Plan which indicate where such installations are not appropriate.  Members agreed to leave  “where appropriate” in the language.  (As aside, Mr. Dorn announced that an agreement has  been reached on the solar installation at the Landfill.)    With regard to Ms. Crocker’s comments, members felt they should wait for the City Attorney’s  opinion regarding the conservation easement.  They felt her last sentence was unnecessary.   Ms. Nowak asked to leave in “long been identified” but was OK with removing “important” with  regard to east‐west corridors.    With regard to Ms. Leban’s comments on the view shed, Ms. LaRose noted no language from  the plan has been removed.  She cited the difference between a “view shed” and a “view  overlay district.”  No action was taken on this request.  Members felt the issue of a model  lighting ordinance was outside the bounds of the Comprehensive Plan.    Mr. Shaw said he had an interest in preservation of topsoil.  Members agreed to discuss this at  Monday night’s meeting.    4. Possible Warning of Second City Council Public Hearing on South Burlington  Comprehensive Plan:    This item was tabled until the next City Council meeting.    5. Consider warning public hearing on draft amendment to the Land Development  Regulations redesignating an approximately 0.34 acre segment of land located  immediately south of Park Road in the Southeast Quadrant from the Park and  Recreation District to the Southeast Quadrant Neighborhood Residential sub‐ district:    Mr. Dorn noted this is a little piece that got left off the original warning.  He suggested 4  January 2016 for the public hearing.    Ms. Emery moved to schedule a public hearing for 4 January 2016, 6:10 p.m. on draft  amendments to the Land Development Regulations redesignting an approximately 0.34 acre  SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL  15 DECEMBER 2015  PAGE 6     segment of land located immediately south of Park Road in the Southeast Quadrant from the  Park and Recreation District to the Southeast Quadrant Neighborhood Residential sub‐district.   Ms. Riehle seconded.  Motion passed unanimously.    6. Comments & Questions from the public not related to the agenda:  There were no issues raised.  7. Other Business:  No issues were raised.  As there was no further business to come before the Council, Ms. Emery moved to adjourn.   Ms. Riehle seconded.  Motion passed unanimously.  The meeting was adjourned at 10:32 p.m.           ________________________________       Clerk     575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com MEMORANDUM TO: Kevin Dorn, City Manager South Burlington City Council South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: Paul Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning SUBJECT: Summary of Draft amendments to the Land Development Regulations DATE: December 21, 2015 Joint City Council / Planning Commission meeting Below please find a brief description of the draft amendments to the Land Development Regulations and Official Map under consideration December 21st by the City Council. At the meeting, which for this item will be a joint meeting between the City Council and Planning Commission, the City Council is invited to open its Public Hearing to start off this item. After that, Commissioners will provide an overview of the amendments to both documents and will be happy to answer any questions that come up. Staff will be on hand as well. Please note that while the list below tries to pull out the principal changes, in some cases they are grouped together (such as definition changes), or may not be specifically enumerated below. In addition, the section references below are for general guidance only; there may be other changes related to the topics below that fall under a different section. Due to the nature of amendments involving nearly every article in the LDTs, please note that the list below is intended to be a summary and should not be treated as a comprehensive list of every draft modification to the LDRs. All of the amendments under consideration have been reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission following a review by the City’s legal counsel. The public may, after the presentation by the Commission, provide feedback to the City Council on the draft amendments. The Council may, thereafter, elect to close or continue the public hearing. If the Council is satisfied with the amendments as presented, the Council may choose to vote to adopt the amendments on this same night. Should the Council wish to make changes, it may do so but must warn a new public hearing on the revised document. The Planning Commission will then need to prepare a revised report on the amendments’ consistency with State planning goals and the Comprehensive Plan. A copy of the Draft Land Development Regulations in their entirety, and a copy of the draft Official Map, can be found online at www.sburl.com/planning. 1. General Revisions to Definitions Brief Summary: This is a general “clean-up” of definitions, refining terms and eliminating duplicate terms, adding new terms for newer land uses and terms used in the Form Based Code and 2 Stormwater sections. A focus of the changes was to create greater consistency with the terms in the Table of Uses. (Appendix C). Location in the LDRs: Section 2.02, Definitions; and Appendix C, Table of Uses 2. Stormwater Low Impact Development Standards Brief Summary: This section would replace the Stormwater Overlay District, which has applied for all development in the Bartlett Brook watershed for the past several years, with a city-wide standard. The new city-wide standard would (1) set a threshold of ½ acre of disturbance / development to trigger stormwater management requirements (lower than the state’s 1 acre, but above anything that would affect single family homes in nearly all cases) and requiring, where possible, the use of Low Impact Development Techniques (ie, soaking of water into the ground on-site) for typical rainfalls. The City has recommended these practices city-wide for the past several years. Location in the LDRs: Principally in Section 12.03 Stormwater Management Standards, with related adjustments in Section 2.02, Definitions; Section 3.06 setbacks & buffers; Section 5.08, Supplemental Standards for All Commercial Districts; Section 9.11, Supplemental Standards for Arterial and Collector Streets [SEQ]; Section 12.01 General Stream and Surface Water Protection Standards; Section 13.01, Off-Street Parking and Loading; Section 13.06, Landscaping, Screening, and Street Trees; 13.23 Outdoor Exercise facilities for animal shelters, commercial kennels, pet day care, and veterinary hospitals; Section 14.07, Site Plan Specific Review Standards; Section 16.03 Standards for Erosion Control during Construction; Section 15.13 Utility Services 3. Establish City Center Form Based Codes District and associated street types Brief Summary: Establishes a new Form Based Codes District for the City Center area, including the areas previously zoned as Central Districts 1-4, Commercial 1-Residential 12, and some areas previously in the Residential 4. The FBC District itself consists of a set of Transect Zones that allow different scales of development (from T3 up to T5, representing, for example, a transition from allowing 2½ stories up to 6 stories. There is also a new T1 district, which is intended to show likely wetland areas). Included within this district are a set of Open Space standards and an associated Appendix of allowable open space types. Typical street types are also established for the entire district. Location in the LDRs: Article 8, City Center FBC District; Article 11, Street Types; Appendix F. 4. Eliminate Central Districts 1-4 and Design Districts 1-3 Brief Summary: The current regulations for Central Districts 1-4 and the overlay design review districts 1-3 in the City Center area are proposed to be eliminated. They are proposed to be replaced by the City Center Form Based Code. Location in the LDRs: Article 8, Central District; Article 11, Design Review District 5. Official Map – City Center overhaul and amendment to address the JAM Golkf settlement on the Wheeler Nature Park Brief Summary: Replaces the portion of the 2004 City Official Map with a revised one that reflects the planned principal roadways and recreation paths in the City Center area. Also codifies the long- 3 standing planned right-of-way widening along Williston and Hinesburg Roads to require the land (~7-10’) from the back of the sidewalk be accommodated. In the Southeast Quadrant, removes the Park & Open space designation of ~7 acres of land on the Wheeler Nature Park pursuant to the JAM Golf settlement. Location: City Official Map pages 1 & 2. 6. Form Based Codes Review Process & Notice Requirements Brief Summary: Applications under the draft City Center Form Based Code are proposed to be largely reviewed administratively. Exceptions include subdivisions, wetland and stream encroachments, applications for public buildings, and appeals of the Administrative Officer. Public notice requirements are increased, however, for such applications, and applicants for larger projects must hold a neighborhood meeting. Location in the LDRs: Article 8, City Center Form Based Code; Section 14.05 Application, Review and Approval Procedure; and Section 14.07, Site Plan Specific Review Standards; 7. Establish Inclusionary Housing requirements in the City Center Form Based Codes area Brief Summary: Establishes requirement for 15% of all housing units (in developments of 12+ units) to meet a scaled affordability criteria, pursuant to recommendations of the Affordable Housing Committee. The scaling is as following: one-third of the required affordable units must be affordable to households at 80% of median household income, one-third at 100%, and one-third at 120%. Location in the LDRs: Section 18.01 Affordable Housing 8. Relocate Affordable Housing Bonus Section, adjust definition of affordable housing Brief Summary: Relocates the section of Affordable Housing density bonuses for ease of readability, adjusts definition of affordable housing for rental units to be 80% of the Burlington-South Burlington Metropolitan Statistical Area median income rather than 65% of county median income, consistent with state definitions. Location in the LDRs: Section 2.02, Definitions; relocation from 13.14, Affordable Housing (Below Market Housing) to Article 18 9. Revisions to permitted uses in the table of uses Brief Summary: Allows for self-storage facilities in the Mixed IC district, outside of the transit-served areas; allows for pet grooming associated with other pet facilities; removes the term “general merchandise stores” from the retail use category, clarifies crematoriums as part of funeral homes, separates processing and storage from warehousing and distribution, and clarifies certain terms to be consistent with definitions. Location in the LDRs: Appendix C- Table of Uses 10. Group Homes; Reasonable Accommodation to Ensure Reasonable Access to Housing Brief Summary: These amendments include two elements: 4 (1) Matching the City’s Land Development Regulations with the Statutory enabling laws in 24 V.S.A. Chapter 117 in terms of residential care and group homes being considered single family homes under certain circumstances. The current LDRs largely meet this, but this amendment would match the wording exactly. (2) Replacing a number of unclear categories of housing within the current regulations – such as group homes that are not covered under 24 VSA Chapter 117, community residences and shelters, and others – with a new standard for “reasonable accommodation to ensure reasonable access to housing.” This new standard would highlight and provide a process for the Administrative Officer or Development Review Board (as applicable) to provide individuals with disabilities reasonable accommodation to ensure equal access to housing in accordance with Federal and State Fair Housing laws. Location in the LDRs: Section 2.02, Definitions; Section 3.14, Reasonable Accommodations to Ensure Reasonable Access to Housing; Section 13.12, Group Homes and Residential Care Homes; 11. Establish a new SEQ-Neighborhood Residential North subdistrict, expand SEQ-NRN by 0.34 acres from present Park and Recreation District Brief Summary: Creates a new zoning district, SEQ-NRN, that is based on the SEQ-Neighborhood Residential District, and expands the SEQ-NR district by 0.34 acres. This district is established as part of the JAM Golf / Highlands Development Settlement. Location in the LDRs: Throughout Article 9, SEQ. 12. Requirement for Stretch Energy Code compliance Brief Summary: Requires all new principal building construction to meet the State’s Stretch Energy Code / Guidelines, as is already required for all projects submitted to Act 250. Location in the LDRs: To be included in Article 3, General Provisions 13. Shift boundary of Industrial-Open Space and SEQ-NR. Brief Summary: Expands SEQ-Neighborhood Residential district slightly across from Butler Farms where a portion of the I/O district sticks into the otherwise SEQ-NR district. Location in the LDRs: Draft Zoning Map 14. Clarify location of Traffic Overlay Zone 3 Brief Summary: Clarifies that Traffic Overlay Zone 3 is defined as shown on the Overlay District Map, as is done with the other two Zones. Location in the LDRs: Section 10.02, Traffic Overlay District 15. Clarifies that landscaping interior to parking lots does not apply to structured or underground parking Brief Summary: Codifies current practice as described. 5 Location in the LDRs: Section 13.06, Landscaping, Screening, and Street Trees 16. Accommodation for and screening of composting collection facilities Brief Summary: Adds compost to current recycling and trash pickup areas in preparing for upcoming statewide composting requirements. Location in the LDRs: Section 13.06, Landscaping, Screening, and Street Trees 17. Remove DRB approval requirement for underground parking of multi-family dwellings Brief Summary: Removes requirement that a DRB specifically approve underground parking; with the change, it would be treated as any other parking is treated (DRB or Admin, as applicable) Location in the LDRs: Section 13.01, Off-Street Parking and Loading 18. Clarify authority to consider multiple buildings on a single lot as a PUD Brief Summary: Clarifies present practice to allow multiple principal structures on a single lot as a PUD outside of the City Center FBC. Location in the LDRs: Section 3.09 multi structures and uses 19. Remove requirement for the DRB to review application for bus shelters Brief Summary: Removes requirement that a DRB specifically approve bus shelters; with the change, it would be treated as any other parking is treated (DRB or Admin, as applicable) Location in the LDRs: Section 13.09, Bus Shelters 20. Consolidate application submission requirements Brief Summary: Consolidates the majority of application submittal requirement to a single table from being scattered throughout the LDRs. Included in the consolidation was an an evaluation and refinement of what is needed for each type of application. Location in the LDRs: Appendix E, Submission requirements; and removed from Section 13.06, Landscaping, Screening, and Street Trees; Section 14.05, Site Plan Application, Review, and Approval Procedure; Section 15.05, Subdivision Sketch Plan Review; Section 15.07 Subdivision Master Plan Review and Approval; and Section 15.08 Major Subdivision or PUD Approval Procedure. 21. Reduce Parking requirements for studio / 1 bedroom units Brief Summary: Lowers minimum parking citywide for studio / 1 bedroom dwelling units from 2.25 per unit to 1.25 per unit. Location in the LDRs: Table 13-1, Parking Requirements, Residential Uses 22. Update tree selection standards 6 Brief Summary: Updates the references to guidelines for the selection of tree species, and specifically allows the City Arborist to make recommendations. Location in the LDRs: Section 13.06, Landscaping, Screening, and Street Trees 23. Expand Review Authority of Administrative Officer to include traffic generation Brief Summary: Allows traffic generation to be determined by the Administrative Officer where the Administrative Officer has authority to review the remainder of the project. This will ensure that projects that would otherwise be reviewed administratively do not have to go to the DRB solely to determine traffic. Location in the LDRs: Section 10.02, Traffic Overlay District 24. Simplify Review Procedures within the Airport District Brief Summary: Allows for most applications in the Airport District (Terminal Area) to be reviewed as Site Plans (1 step) vs Planned Unit Developments (3 steps) except where required to be PUDs. This was previously an additional process requirement above those in most other districts. Location in the LDRs: Section 6.02 Airport District AIR 25. Remove duplicate and conflicting height standard in the SEQ Brief Summary: In a previous set of amendments, height standards in SEQ districts were adjusted. A second reference to the former height standards was not removed at the time. This cleans up that oversight. Location in the LDRs: Section 9.06, Dimensional and Design Requirements applicable to all sub- districts 26. Minimum façade width in the SEQ. Brief Summary: Requires a minimum amount of non-garage door space along a street for single family homes duplexes. Location in the LDRs: Section 9.06, Dimensional and Design Requirements applicable to all sub- districts 27. Accessory Structures on through lots Brief Summary: Clarifies that accessory structures on lots that front on two parallel streets may have the accessory structure in the “front yards” of the secondary street. This would allow for an accessory structure to be placed in what would generally be considered the property’s “back yard” as is permitted elsewhere. Location in the LDRs: Section 3.10, Accessory Structures and Uses. 28. Plan approval and permit expiry modifications 7 Brief Summary: Clarifies expiration of approvals. Zoning permits are proposed to be extended from 6 months to 1 year expiry from the date of issuance, with a more specific standard for when effort has been made to initiate. DRB and Administrative officer plan approvals continue to expire after six months unless a longer terms has been approved or a 1-year extension has been granted. Subdivisions do not expire once fully recorded; this change is made to reflect state law. Location in the LDRs: Section 14.05 Application, Review and Approval Procedure; 17.04 Expiration of Permits and Approvals 29. Administrative Officer Authority Brief Summary: Clarifies authority of the Administrative Officer and adds that the Administrative Officer may invoke technical review of projects. Location in the LDRs: Section 17.09 Administrative Officer 30. Relocate DRB authority to invoke technical review Brief Summary: Clarifies that the DRB has the authority to invoke technical review for any project; previously it was contained within each chapter. Location in the LDRs: Section 17.08 Development Review Board 31. Administrative Officer Appeals clarification Brief Summary: Clarifies that appeals of the Administrative Officer follow state law. Location in the LDRs: Section 17.13 Appeals 32. Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy Brief Summary: Requires a post-construction C.O. for inclusionary single and two-family homes in the City Center Form Based Codes district to ensure they have been built as they are a requirement. Location in the LDRs: Section 17.03 Certificates of Occupancy 33. Revised Standards for Street Ends Brief Summary: These draft regulations contain revised, reduced-dimension standards for street ends (cul-de-sacs and other turn-arounds). These were developed and tested in coordination with the Department of Public Works and Fire Department. Location in the LDRs: Section 15.12 Standards for Roadways, Parking and Circulation 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com MEMORANDUM TO: Kevin Dorn, City Manager South Burlington City Council FROM: Cathyann LaRose, AICP, City Planner SUBJECT: Draft Comprehensive Plan DATE: December 17, 2015 After closing the December 15th public hearing on the draft Comprehensive Plan, the City Council discussed several items for potential change. These items are summarized below. There are also several items for which the Council directed Staff to craft language for review with the intent to clarify, support, or update what already exists in the draft. Possible (draft) changes: • Include more text documenting and supporting the Form Based Code Committee and Committee work. Staff recommends the following: 1. In the Executive Summary, page ii, add Form Based Code Committee to the 2nd full paragraph. The paragraph may now read: Portions of the plan were refined through the committees formed in 2012 to develop subject-specific reports.- Affordable Housing, Open Space, Sustainable Agriculture- as well as the Form Based Code Committee which recommended a series of specific draft amendments to the Land Development Regulations for a newly defined City Center Form Based Codes Overlay District. Each of these committees held several targeted and well attended community meetings and discussion sessions…….Each ultimately produced a report or draft language which provided direct feedback incorporated into the Plan. 2. Page 1-6, under Planning Process, the third paragraph can be changed to read as: Public input has been gathered ……….Each ultimately produced a report which provided direct feedback to be incorporated into the City’s plan. At the same time, the City also appointed the Form Based Code Committee to work through ideas for improvements to the City Center area, with a focus on using form-based coding as a tool to improve design in the District. The Committee ultimately proposed a new City Center Form Based Code Overlay District along with a draft set of recommendations for Planning Commission consideration. 3. Page 1-10, Implementation, Under Land Development Regulations, add Form Based Code as a tool. Paragraph may now read as: ♦ Establishment of zoning and overlay districts ♦ Site plan and conditional use standards 2 ♦ Performance standards ♦ Form Based Code inspired standards ♦ Inclusionary zoning....... 4. Central District updated to reflect Form Based Codes Overlay District and importance of form based code tool in area. See 3.2C, page 3-10. 6th bullet of bulleted paragraph may now be revised to read as: Development of new, streamlined Land Development Regulations for the area which are inspired by form based coding and include new open space requirements; • Revise 1.1, Vision and Goals 1. Under Affordable and Community Strong, second bullet, add a focus on enhancement in case maintenance is not the desired standard. Bullet will now read: Keep unique features, and maintain or enhance the quality of life of existing neighborhoods; • Amend Strategy 4, Housing, to make clear that the tools listed are for exploration only. Reconsider use of “Implement” in strategy. Staff offers the following possible text revisions for consideration: • Include recommendations from Recreation and Leisure Arts Committee, per November 18th letter from Jennifer Kochman. This has been completed. • Address aquifer recharge areas (Councilor Riehle) We are continuing to work on possible language. • Address Quality of Life in relation to Transportation (Councilor Emery) We are continuing discussions with Councilor Emery and plan to have language for Monday’s discussion. Comprehensive Plan Councilors have been given a printed copy of the warned Plan. Anyone wishing to access the Plan online may find it at www.sburl.com/planning. December 7, 2015    Dear South Burlington City Council members,  Recently, several electric utilities have met their net‐metering cap, which means they are no longer  allowing new net‐metered renewable energy projects. Our electric utility, Green Mountain Power  (GMP), serving over 70 percent of Vermont, is up against their cap as well, though they have recently  petitioned the Public Service Board (PSB) to ask for permission to allow more renewable energy  projects. Approval of this petition is needed to ensure that South Burlington residents and businesses  who want to go solar can still do so in 2016 — while the federal 30 percent investment tax credit is still  available. Note that the in‐process landfill solar project is exempt from the cap.    Linda Gray, Norwich Energy Committee Chair, is asking other energy committees to sign onto a letter  (below on page 2) which simply asks the PSB to support GMPs request for net‐metering expansion —  and to make this decision soon. On December 3, 2015, the South Burlington Energy Committee voted  unanimously to request City Council approval to add the South Burlington Energy Committee to the  Norwich Energy Committee’s letter to the Public Service Board. Could you please review the letter  below and give your approval for the Energy Committee to add our name to the letter?    Thank you,    South Burlington Energy Committee  Keith Epstein, Chair  Karen McKenny, Vice‐chair  Don Cummings  Fred Kosnitsky  Wayne Maceyka  Linda McGinnis  Marcy Murray  Sam Swanson  Patty Tashiro  Thor Vue                            To the Public Service Board:    We are writing as members of Town Energy Committees across the state to urge you to move  expeditiously on Green Mountain Power's recent filing on net‐metering.    As you know, GMP's filing and Board approval are required because the utility has met its current net  metering cap about a year in advance of expectations. The new net metering program will not begin  until January 2017, which leaves a gap for all of 2016.     Yet crucially, 2016 is the final year in which residential customers can benefit from the federal  Investment Tax Credit, a still‐critical piece of financing for solar installations.    GMP is proposing to continue to allow homes and businesses to go solar by accepting net metering  applications that are 15 kW and under, and to accept 7.5 MW of community projects for homes and  businesses that cannot directly place solar on their home or property. This is an essential response to  ensure net metering is available to many Vermonters. That said, we would also encourage GMP and the  PSB to not cap bigger net metering projects at 7.5 MW, since this will likely leave many of the 70 percent  of Vermonters who can’t go solar on their home or business for one reason or another with no options  to invest in clean energy. To this end, we would respectfully request the PSB consider a higher cap for  community projects.    Across the state, in support of Vermont's Comprehensive Energy Plan, we have been working in our  towns to encourage residents and businesses to "solarize" and hope to continue that effort in 2016.     Please resolve the current uncertainty as quickly as possible. We urge you to approve GMP's filing in  January 2016 at the latest and, if possible, keep the door open for community projects if the 7.5 MW  threshold is exceeded in 2016.    Thank you in advance for your timely response and consideration.     Sincerely,  Norwich Energy Committee   XXXX Energy Committee     Expenditure Report-November, 2015 General Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2016 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-) Paid November Total CITY COUNCIL $289,386.05 $73,175.33 25.29% $216,210.72 $248.00 Total ADMINISTRATIVE INSURANCE $3,723,740.48 $1,216,701.05 32.67% $2,507,039.43 $147,852.96 Total CITY MANAGER $579,821.77 $210,902.76 36.37% $368,919.01 $41,466.95 Total LEGAL, ACCOUNTING, ACTUARY $256,608.60 $157,270.46 61.29% $99,338.14 $78,064.36 Total ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $715,970.75 $157,369.38 21.98% $558,601.37 $16,372.49 Total INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $105,744.15 $54,014.58 51.08% $51,729.57 $15,727.84 Total CITY CLERK $231,661.10 $84,039.02 36.28% $147,622.08 $14,339.64 Total ASSESSING/TAX/FINANCE $238,069.76 $104,422.35 43.86% $133,647.41 $17,094.27 Total PLANNING/DESIGN REVIEW $316,139.44 $107,474.53 34.00% $208,664.91 $21,747.87 Total OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT $543,700.00 $543,700.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Total GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXP. $7,000,842.10 $2,709,069.46 38.70% $4,291,772.64 $352,914.38 Total FIRE DEPARTMENT $2,492,657.04 $1,049,133.20 42.09% $1,443,523.84 $168,716.22 Total AMBULANCE $715,713.27 $337,987.14 47.22% $377,726.13 $76,620.74 Total POLICE DEPARTMENT $4,626,630.00 $1,704,767.73 36.85% $2,921,862.27 $361,667.81 Total PUBLIC SAFETY $7,835,000.31 $3,091,888.07 39.46% $4,743,112.24 $607,004.77 Total OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT $692,489.06 $615,929.00 88.94% $76,560.06 $0.00 Total HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT $2,204,753.91 $642,911.45 29.16% $1,561,842.46 $124,249.28 Total RECREATION ADMINISTRATION $250,384.98 $121,738.82 48.62% $128,646.16 $20,776.20 Total PROGRAMS $48,730.00 $25,564.84 52.46% $23,165.16 $5,156.38 Total FACILITIES $91,017.74 $17,490.30 19.22% $73,527.44 $2,121.60 Total LEISURE ARTS $3,600.00 $1,800.00 50.00% $1,800.00 $1,800.00 Total SPECIAL ACTIVITIES $118,300.00 $13,504.30 11.42% $104,795.70 $3,420.07 Total COMMUNITY LIBRARY $451,707.42 $149,215.50 33.03% $302,491.92 $29,518.05 Total CAPITAL/PARK MAINTENANCE $207,780.79 $92,641.63 44.59% $115,139.16 $15,306.46 Total CULTURE AND RECREATION $1,171,520.93 $421,955.39 36.02% $749,565.54 $78,098.76 Total OTHER OPERATING ENTITIES $668,025.00 $470,576.22 70.44% $197,448.78 $151,129.00 Total CURRENT PRINCIPAL $796,512.00 $533,589.00 66.99% $262,923.00 $0.00 Total CURRENT INTEREST $784,001.93 $151,740.28 19.35% $632,261.65 $0.00 Total All Funds $21,153,145.24 $8,637,658.87 40.83% $12,515,486.37 $1,313,396.19 Expenditure Report-November, 2015 General Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2016 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-) Paid November GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXP. CITY COUNCIL General Expenses $1,500.00 $667.33 44.49% $832.67 $0.00 Housing Trust $50,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $50,000.00 $0.00 Designated Reserve $155,724.05 $0.00 0.00% $155,724.05 $0.00 Advertising $1,000.00 $546.00 54.60% $454.00 $248.00 G.B.I.C. $5,000.00 $5,000.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 V.L.C.T. $19,982.00 $19,982.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Chamber of Commerce $3,600.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,600.00 $0.00 Social Services $37,840.00 $37,840.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 CCTV-Clickable Meetings $5,000.00 $5,000.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Councilors $5,480.00 $0.00 0.00% $5,480.00 $0.00 Liquor Control $300.00 $0.00 0.00% $300.00 $0.00 Front Porch Forum $3,960.00 $4,140.00 104.55% ($180.00) $0.00 Total CITY COUNCIL $289,386.05 $73,175.33 25.29% $216,210.72 $248.00 ADMINISTRATIVE INSURANCE Payment to Sickbank Fund $125,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $125,000.00 $0.00 Fringe Benefits $17,995.00 $9,481.10 52.69% $8,513.90 $404.74 FICA/Medicare $11,866.86 $0.00 0.00% $11,866.86 $0.00 Vision Plan $12,960.89 $5,109.51 39.42% $7,851.38 $1,030.59 Short Term Disability Pla $16,402.72 $6,142.40 37.45% $10,260.32 $1,228.48 Long Term Disability $1,560.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,560.00 $0.00 Group Health Insurance $1,575,261.28 $599,942.11 38.09% $975,319.17 $121,350.12 Bank - Benefits $71,000.00 $10,980.56 15.47% $60,019.44 $574.43 Group Life Insurance $14,208.00 $11,703.13 82.37% $2,504.87 $2,355.13 Group Dental Insurance $108,160.23 $45,767.97 42.31% $62,392.26 $9,355.42 Pension $640,155.72 $17,483.01 2.73% $622,672.71 $0.00 ICMA Match $136,571.49 $43,975.67 32.20% $92,595.82 $9,001.68 Workers Comp Insurance $541,615.93 $254,490.30 46.99% $287,125.63 $0.00 Property Insurance $406,362.36 $205,559.08 50.59% $200,803.28 $0.00 VLCT Unemployment Insuran $12,500.00 $4,654.74 37.24% $7,845.26 $2,327.37 Deductibles/Coinsurance $15,000.00 $1,411.47 9.41% $13,588.53 $225.00 Employee Payouts $17,120.00 $0.00 0.00% $17,120.00 $0.00 Total ADMINISTRATIVE INSURANCE $3,723,740.48 $1,216,701.05 32.67% $2,507,039.43 $147,852.96 CITY MANAGER City Mgr.Salaries-Perm. $418,786.43 $185,751.93 44.35% $233,034.50 $34,273.51 City Mgr.Salaries-Other $3,028.96 $0.00 0.00% $3,028.96 $0.00 Leave Time Turn-In $8,222.00 $0.00 0.00% $8,222.00 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $32,684.38 $14,813.03 45.32% $17,871.35 $2,656.42 Office Supplies $4,500.00 $2,263.97 50.31% $2,236.03 $674.85 Advertising $4,000.00 $1,184.80 29.62% $2,815.20 $810.80 Telephone $4,200.00 $2,195.61 52.28% $2,004.39 $458.43 Postage $3,900.00 ($0.50) -0.01% $3,900.50 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $3,500.00 $144.40 4.13% $3,355.60 $18.60 Printing $4,000.00 $893.52 22.34% $3,106.48 $0.00 Consulting Fees $85,000.00 $184.50 0.22% $84,815.50 $0.00 Travel & Training $8,000.00 $3,471.50 43.39% $4,528.50 $2,574.34 Total CITY MANAGER $579,821.77 $210,902.76 36.37% $368,919.01 $41,466.95 Expenditure Report-November, 2015 General Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2016 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-) Paid November LEGAL, ACCOUNTING, ACTUARY Legal,Accouting, Actuary FICA/Medicare $6,765.04 $0.00 0.00% $6,765.04 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $2,940.00 $1,190.00 40.48% $1,750.00 $490.00 Hiring-required testing $0.00 $183.00 100.00% ($183.00) $0.00 Payroll Processing Fees $18,800.00 $7,371.20 39.21% $11,428.80 $3,137.89 Appeals/Abatements $10,000.00 $55,742.01 557.42% ($45,742.01) $42,462.51 Gen Govt. Actuaries/Pensi $20,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $20,000.00 $0.00 Gen Govt. Audit/Accountin $22,000.00 $19,500.00 88.64% $2,500.00 $0.00 Legal/Labor/Suits $85,000.00 $23,498.51 27.65% $61,501.49 $13,334.28 Legal Costs $91,103.56 $49,785.74 54.65% $41,317.82 $18,639.68 Total LEGAL, ACCOUNTING, ACTUARY $256,608.60 $157,270.46 61.29% $99,338.14 $78,064.36 ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Muni Bld Cleaning Supplie $1,500.00 $504.03 33.60% $995.97 $220.89 Office Equipment Fees $9,000.00 $2,115.00 23.50% $6,885.00 $0.00 Muni Bld Cleaning Service $24,000.00 $9,335.14 38.90% $14,664.86 $1,829.10 City Hall Maintenance $25,000.00 $19,001.92 76.01% $5,998.08 $2,245.56 Contingency Fund-Infrastr $150,000.00 ($1,092.58) -0.73% $151,092.58 ($1,580.41) HVAC Maintenance $1,334.88 $0.00 0.00% $1,334.88 $0.00 Positive Pay Fee $800.00 $319.04 39.88% $480.96 $60.76 Electricity-City Hall $20,000.00 $2,252.12 11.26% $17,747.88 $0.00 Utilities-City Hall $24,000.00 $1,848.75 7.70% $22,151.25 $587.77 Street Lights $140,000.00 $41,163.46 29.40% $98,836.54 $10,610.84 Stormwater User Rent $289,981.44 $75,050.55 25.88% $214,930.89 $651.78 Urban Art Project Park $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,000.00 $0.00 Emergency Mgmt Center $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,500.00 $0.00 Generator Prevent Maint. $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,000.00 $0.00 Council/Board Secretary $8,827.30 $6,871.95 77.85% $1,955.35 $1,746.20 Support Staff $16,027.13 $0.00 0.00% $16,027.13 $0.00 Total ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES $715,970.75 $157,369.38 21.98% $558,601.37 $16,372.49 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IT Staff $46,958.37 $18,515.28 39.43% $28,443.09 $3,595.20 FICA/Medicare $3,385.78 $1,414.47 41.78% $1,971.31 $274.84 Computer Software $12,000.00 $3,422.55 28.52% $8,577.45 $605.46 Assess digital integratio $5,000.00 $4,105.87 82.12% $894.13 $185.37 Computer Hardware $33,400.00 $25,066.83 75.05% $8,333.17 $11,066.97 IT Service $5,000.00 $1,489.58 29.79% $3,510.42 $0.00 Total INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY $105,744.15 $54,014.58 51.08% $51,729.57 $15,727.84 CITY CLERK City Clerk Salaries-Perm. $173,292.74 $70,125.19 40.47% $103,167.55 $13,017.33 Leave Time Turn-In $5,620.00 $0.00 0.00% $5,620.00 $0.00 Overtime $1,000.00 $93.70 9.37% $906.30 $31.49 FICA/Medicare $13,180.36 $5,527.57 41.94% $7,652.79 $1,026.70 General Supplies $2,500.00 $792.75 31.71% $1,707.25 $26.93 Animal Control $5,570.00 $686.00 12.32% $4,884.00 $0.00 Election Expenses $7,250.00 $74.00 1.02% $7,176.00 $74.00 School Election Expenses $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,500.00 $0.00 Telephone $700.00 $100.47 14.35% $599.53 $20.60 Postage $2,200.00 $0.00 0.00% $2,200.00 $0.00 Expenditure Report-November, 2015 General Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2016 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-) Paid November Dues and Subscriptions $300.00 $280.00 93.33% $20.00 $0.00 Printing $375.00 $0.00 0.00% $375.00 $0.00 Contractual Services $4,000.00 $3,123.50 78.09% $876.50 $0.00 Board of Civil Authority $2,200.00 $0.00 0.00% $2,200.00 $0.00 Election Workers $2,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $2,000.00 $0.00 BCA Appeals/Abatements $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,500.00 $0.00 Office Equip Maintenance $2,273.00 $1,655.14 72.82% $617.86 $0.00 Travel & Training $4,700.00 $1,088.90 23.17% $3,611.10 $21.16 Photocopier Lease Prin $1,500.00 $491.80 32.79% $1,008.20 $121.43 Total CITY CLERK $231,661.10 $84,039.02 36.28% $147,622.08 $14,339.64 ASSESSING/TAX Assessing/Tax Sal.-Perm. $203,350.93 $88,089.92 43.32% $115,261.01 $15,723.22 Overtime $200.00 $319.26 159.63% ($119.26) $80.61 FICA/Medicare $15,556.35 $7,025.04 45.16% $8,531.31 $1,281.56 Office Supplies $1,834.10 $881.34 48.05% $952.76 $0.00 Tax Sales Advertising $1,936.50 $0.00 0.00% $1,936.50 $0.00 Telephone $301.88 $43.30 14.34% $258.58 $8.88 Postage $5,500.00 $3,067.00 55.76% $2,433.00 $0.00 Dues and Memberships $590.00 $240.00 40.68% $350.00 $0.00 Printing $3,500.00 $3,481.49 99.47% $18.51 $0.00 NEMRC/APEX $1,300.00 $625.00 48.08% $675.00 $0.00 Travel & Training $4,000.00 $650.00 16.25% $3,350.00 $0.00 Total ASSESSING/TAX $238,069.76 $104,422.35 43.86% $133,647.41 $17,094.27 PLANNING/DESIGN REVIEW Planning Salaries-Perm. $224,088.78 $89,257.53 39.83% $134,831.25 $17,328.00 Planning Salaries-Other $7,444.09 $0.00 0.00% $7,444.09 $0.00 Leave Time Turn-In $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,000.00 $0.00 Overtime $6,300.00 $2,040.39 32.39% $4,259.61 $520.05 FICA/Medicare $17,706.57 $6,947.58 39.24% $10,758.99 $1,368.11 Office Supplies $4,000.00 $1,510.38 37.76% $2,489.62 $1,430.68 Public Meeting Advertisin $4,000.00 $1,965.00 49.13% $2,035.00 $342.80 Telephone $750.00 $107.62 14.35% $642.38 $22.06 Postage $1,250.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,250.00 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $1,200.00 $353.00 29.42% $847.00 $0.00 Document Printing $2,000.00 $1,061.21 53.06% $938.79 $526.44 Maps $500.00 $0.00 0.00% $500.00 $0.00 Consultants $27,000.00 $3,562.50 13.19% $23,437.50 $0.00 Committee Support $2,900.00 $327.41 11.29% $2,572.59 $27.73 PC/DRB Stipends $8,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $8,500.00 $0.00 Travel & Training $5,500.00 $341.91 6.22% $5,158.09 $182.00 Total PLANNING/DESIGN REVIEW $316,139.44 $107,474.53 34.00% $208,664.91 $21,747.87 OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT Ambulance Department $155,000.00 $155,000.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Fuel Pump Reserve Fund $8,200.00 $8,200.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Open Space Reserve Fund $285,000.00 $285,000.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Reappraisal Fund $95,500.00 $95,500.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Total OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT $543,700.00 $543,700.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Expenditure Report-November, 2015 General Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2016 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-) Paid November Total GENERAL GOVERNMENT EXP. $7,000,842.10 $2,709,069.46 38.70% $4,291,772.64 $352,914.38 PUBLIC SAFETY FIRE DEPARTMENT Fire Salaries-Permanent $1,443,739.99 $536,627.00 37.17% $907,112.99 $107,488.37 Fire Salaries-On Call $2,500.00 $564.95 22.60% $1,935.05 $0.00 Holiday Pay $166,540.00 $100,885.80 60.58% $65,654.20 $19,219.77 Fair Labor Standard O/T $80,000.00 $2,288.64 2.86% $77,711.36 $295.44 F/D Overtime - Fill-In $65,000.00 $79,604.35 122.47% ($14,604.35) $15,789.22 F/D Overtime - Training $35,000.00 $22,661.21 64.75% $12,338.79 $1,696.05 F/D Overtime - Emerg Call $7,000.00 $11,359.02 162.27% ($4,359.02) $554.20 Wellness/Fitness $10,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $10,500.00 $0.00 Fire-Off Duty Outside Emp $3,000.00 $1,400.00 46.67% $1,600.00 $320.00 FICA/Medicare $126,440.97 $60,265.53 47.66% $66,175.44 $11,902.71 Office Supplies $2,000.00 $1,803.74 88.94% $196.26 $377.86 Oxygen $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 ($101.26) Vaccinations-HEP $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,000.00 $0.00 REHAB Supplies $300.00 $353.68 117.89% ($53.68) $296.28 Station Operating Supply $4,500.00 $1,868.86 41.53% $2,631.14 $583.44 Maintenance Tools $420.00 $75.92 18.08% $344.08 $0.00 Uniforms-Career $13,000.00 $13,029.22 100.22% ($29.22) $0.00 Firefighting Clothing $6,000.00 $3,879.26 64.65% $2,120.74 ($993.99) Vehicle Tools $1,000.00 $751.41 75.14% $248.59 ($286.24) Gas Chief's vehicle & rei $2,800.00 $1,021.67 36.49% $1,778.33 $157.92 Diesel Fuel $29,000.00 $6,546.59 22.57% $22,453.41 $951.65 Oil $600.00 $0.00 0.00% $600.00 $0.00 Films and Books $1,100.00 $497.93 45.27% $602.07 $477.60 Fire Prevention Materials $3,000.00 $275.80 9.19% $2,724.20 $197.32 Fire Extinguishers $600.00 $0.00 0.00% $600.00 $0.00 Airpacks Maintenance $5,500.00 $976.11 17.75% $4,523.89 $566.35 Telephone $14,000.00 $4,513.45 32.24% $9,486.55 $125.50 Postage-Tool Shipping $450.00 $21.10 4.69% $428.90 $21.10 Dues and Subscriptions $1,350.00 $633.66 46.94% $716.34 $20.33 Contractural Services $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 ($81.27) Fire Station Maintenance $23,597.08 $7,623.34 32.31% $15,973.74 $1,268.93 Laundry and Bedding $900.00 $19.30 2.14% $880.70 $0.00 Radio Repair $2,500.00 $1,352.45 54.10% $1,147.55 $810.00 Vehicle Maintenance $8,000.00 $15,464.27 193.30% ($7,464.27) $4,775.35 Vehicle Repair $13,000.00 $5,775.64 44.43% $7,224.36 $945.28 Equipment R & M $4,000.00 $964.94 24.12% $3,035.06 $23.64 Truck Tires $6,000.00 $729.96 12.17% $5,270.04 $0.00 Computers Contract ACS $2,500.00 $2,917.67 116.71% ($417.67) $432.90 Public Safety Equipment $155,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $155,000.00 $0.00 Conferences $1,500.00 $163.46 10.90% $1,336.54 $163.46 Training Schools $4,000.00 $1,278.78 31.97% $2,721.22 ($298.00) Training - CPR/Other $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 ($21.39) Training Equipment $750.00 $39.48 5.26% $710.52 $0.00 Recruiting & Testing $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,000.00 $0.00 Fire Station #2 Heat/Elec $12,500.00 $4,445.14 35.56% $8,054.86 $886.11 Fire Safety Equipment $57,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $57,500.00 $0.00 F/D Furniture/Equipment $2,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $2,500.00 $0.00 Fire Truck Fit-Up $12,000.00 $151.59 1.26% $11,848.41 $151.59 Firefighting Equipment-ho $10,000.00 $7,908.47 79.08% $2,091.53 $0.00 Note on Quint Fire Truck $149,069.00 $148,393.81 99.55% $675.19 $0.00 Expenditure Report-November, 2015 General Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2016 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-) Paid November Total FIRE DEPARTMENT $2,492,657.04 $1,049,133.20 42.09% $1,443,523.84 $168,716.22 AMBULANCE Permanent Salaries $360,495.52 $153,935.16 42.70% $206,560.36 $35,526.16 EMT Pay $79,426.41 $34,639.82 43.61% $44,786.59 ($11,756.57) Holiday Pay $45,420.00 $25,233.17 55.56% $20,186.83 $5,584.56 Fair Labor Standard OT $32,547.06 $10,618.31 32.62% $21,928.75 $2,062.62 Overtime Fill-In $20,000.00 $21,079.31 105.40% ($1,079.31) $4,362.68 Overtime - Training $15,000.00 $8,007.80 53.39% $6,992.20 $1,256.42 Overtime - Emergency Call $5,000.00 ($877.74) -17.55% $5,877.74 $125.83 Wellness $4,800.00 $280.00 5.83% $4,520.00 $0.00 FICA/MEDI $32,724.28 $19,433.40 59.39% $13,290.88 $4,129.30 Doctor Service Stipend $2,400.00 $0.00 0.00% $2,400.00 $0.00 Office Supplies $2,000.00 $206.36 10.32% $1,793.64 $0.00 Medical Supplies-Disposab $23,500.00 $14,703.04 62.57% $8,796.96 $5,628.09 Medical Supplies-Oxygen $4,000.00 $1,225.04 30.63% $2,774.96 $315.46 Medical Equipment Replace $5,000.00 $2,749.50 54.99% $2,250.50 $227.87 Uniforms-Career $7,000.00 $2,403.04 34.33% $4,596.96 $1,193.99 Diesel Fuel $7,800.00 $1,812.58 23.24% $5,987.42 $262.21 Training Films and Books $750.00 $335.20 44.69% $414.80 $0.00 Telephone $3,000.00 $2,003.81 66.79% $996.19 $507.91 Billing Postage $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,000.00 $0.00 Dues & Subscriptions $500.00 $120.00 24.00% $380.00 $0.00 Radio Repair $1,750.00 $286.75 16.39% $1,463.25 $286.75 Vehicle Maintenance $2,500.00 $2,136.50 85.46% $363.50 ($606.00) Vehicle Repair $3,000.00 $591.05 19.70% $2,408.95 $839.66 Equipment R&M $1,250.00 $417.37 33.39% $832.63 $86.61 Office Equip Maintenance $350.00 $91.67 26.19% $258.33 $0.00 Billing Software/Upgrades $4,000.00 $2,501.54 62.54% $1,498.46 $0.00 Med Equipment Maintenance $1,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,000.00 $0.00 Training Programs $6,000.00 $4,761.39 79.36% $1,238.61 $21.39 Training Equipment $500.00 $0.00 0.00% $500.00 $0.00 To Reserve Fund-Training $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $10,000.00 $0.00 EMS Patient Care Discript $31,000.00 $29,293.07 94.49% $1,706.93 $26,565.80 Total AMBULANCE $715,713.27 $337,987.14 47.22% $377,726.13 $76,620.74 POLICE DEPARTMENT Police Salaries-Permanent $3,013,206.89 $1,136,874.15 37.73% $1,876,332.74 $224,240.05 Police Salaries-Other $0.00 $5,146.23 100.00% ($5,146.23) $1,011.29 Police Salaries-Overtime $220,000.00 $119,025.11 54.10% $100,974.89 $21,626.49 Holiday Pay $277,919.82 $92,139.24 33.15% $185,780.58 $19,304.89 Automatic Corporal $7,470.92 $0.00 0.00% $7,470.92 $0.00 Shift Differential $63,432.16 $20,315.12 32.03% $43,117.04 $3,903.18 Off-Duty Police Salary $22,000.00 $2,420.00 11.00% $19,580.00 $660.00 Fitness $27,300.00 $0.00 0.00% $27,300.00 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $256,432.16 $105,855.03 41.28% $150,577.13 $20,814.36 Office Supplies $11,000.00 $3,582.74 32.57% $7,417.26 $360.75 Range Supplies $12,800.00 $9,062.70 70.80% $3,737.30 $0.00 Radio Equipment-Supplies $800.00 $0.00 0.00% $800.00 $0.00 Investigative Supplies $8,120.00 $3,083.74 37.98% $5,036.26 $427.90 Youth Services Supplies $6,000.00 $1,106.94 18.45% $4,893.06 $414.99 Traffic Unit Supplies $2,000.00 $267.21 13.36% $1,732.79 $0.00 K-9 Supplies $4,000.00 $663.42 16.59% $3,336.58 $0.00 Janitorial Supplies $2,800.00 $1,589.10 56.75% $1,210.90 $328.20 Expenditure Report-November, 2015 General Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2016 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-) Paid November Uniform Supplies $37,000.00 $15,850.30 42.84% $21,149.70 $890.21 Tires $10,200.00 $4,510.08 44.22% $5,689.92 $4,510.08 Gas and Oil $76,000.00 $21,248.25 27.96% $54,751.75 $4,852.94 Telephone $29,000.00 $8,807.55 30.37% $20,192.45 $3,373.16 Postage $2,800.00 $550.08 19.65% $2,249.92 $201.00 Dues and Subscriptions $2,300.00 $1,234.76 53.69% $1,065.24 $209.76 Towing Services $1,000.00 $700.00 70.00% $300.00 $525.00 Crime Prevention Supplies $4,500.00 $83.96 1.87% $4,416.04 $32.00 Building Repairs $3,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,500.00 $0.00 Building Maintenance $7,000.00 $6,293.54 89.91% $706.46 $836.28 3rd Floor Lease $24,526.90 $0.00 0.00% $24,526.90 $0.00 Uniform Cleaning $17,000.00 $3,993.00 23.49% $13,007.00 $1,014.25 Office Equip. Contract $5,000.00 $6,703.76 134.08% ($1,703.76) $0.00 Generator Prevent Maint $700.00 $0.00 0.00% $700.00 $0.00 Radio Equip. Maintenance $11,000.00 $3,555.50 32.32% $7,444.50 $1,420.00 Vehicle Repair $44,000.00 $14,229.19 32.34% $29,770.81 $4,114.52 Computer Connections Syst $14,500.00 $2,000.00 13.79% $12,500.00 $0.00 Equipment Maintenance $3,000.00 $359.25 11.98% $2,640.75 $299.98 Records Management System $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $10,000.00 $0.00 Consulting Services $6,840.00 $2,400.00 35.09% $4,440.00 $1,200.00 Tower Lease $300.00 $300.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Animal Control Contracts $7,901.15 $75.04 0.95% $7,826.11 $0.00 Conferences $6,600.00 $4,024.56 60.98% $2,575.44 $2,135.36 In-Service Training $25,000.00 $3,344.53 13.38% $21,655.47 $117.30 Recruiting & Testing $2,500.00 $50.00 2.00% $2,450.00 $0.00 Tuition Reimbursement $3,400.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,400.00 $0.00 Electric-Police Dept. $36,000.00 $5,607.17 15.58% $30,392.83 $0.00 Heat/Hot Water $7,000.00 $406.73 5.81% $6,593.27 $117.21 Radio Installation Utilit $500.00 $26.70 5.34% $473.30 $0.00 Building Common Area Fees $50,000.00 $30,742.84 61.49% $19,257.16 $14,486.29 Cleaning/Building Service $34,200.00 $13,684.00 40.01% $20,516.00 $3,110.00 Vehicles and Equipment $49,000.00 $16,750.00 34.18% $32,250.00 $16,750.00 Radio Equipment $21,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $21,000.00 $0.00 Taser Replacement $9,080.00 $9,105.00 100.28% ($25.00) $0.00 Police Computerization $129,000.00 $27,001.21 20.93% $101,998.79 $8,380.37 Total POLICE DEPARTMENT $4,626,630.00 $1,704,767.73 36.85% $2,921,862.27 $361,667.81 Total PUBLIC SAFETY #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT To undesignated reserve fund $76,560.06 $0.00 0.00% $76,560.06 $0.00 To Capital Improvements $615,929.00 $615,929.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Total OPERATING TRANSFERS OUT $692,489.06 $615,929.00 88.94% $76,560.06 $0.00 STREETS & HIGHWAYS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Highway Salaries-Perm. $704,617.86 $298,132.28 42.31% $406,485.58 $57,153.95 Highway Salaries-Overtime $26,823.08 $5,264.72 19.63% $21,558.36 ($74.75) FICA/Medicare $53,225.42 $22,321.63 41.94% $30,903.79 $4,608.93 Office Supplies $2,000.00 $771.17 38.56% $1,228.83 $24.65 Traffic Light Supplies $22,500.00 $17,957.21 79.81% $4,542.79 $2,185.51 Sign Supplies $5,500.00 $4,629.89 84.18% $870.11 $463.60 City Highways Material $35,000.00 $8,440.27 24.12% $26,559.73 $1,654.72 Expenditure Report-November, 2015 General Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2016 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-) Paid November Road Striping $12,000.00 $8,764.21 73.04% $3,235.79 $4,601.21 Winter Salt $110,000.00 $14,783.01 13.44% $95,216.99 $0.00 Winter Sand $700.00 $0.00 0.00% $700.00 $0.00 Winter Liquid Deicer Addi $15,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $15,000.00 $0.00 Building Supplies $1,750.00 $826.32 47.22% $923.68 $30.00 Uniforms $20,364.75 $6,429.65 31.57% $13,935.10 $1,003.16 Vehicle Repair Parts $85,000.00 $36,161.79 42.54% $48,838.21 $3,507.97 School Bus Parts $32,500.00 $28,186.23 86.73% $4,313.77 $1,144.74 Gasoline $27,500.00 $7,003.02 25.47% $20,496.98 ($1,685.34) Oil $8,000.00 $3,231.16 40.39% $4,768.84 $2,404.93 Diesel Fuel $65,000.00 ($6,126.03) -9.42% $71,126.03 ($2,522.17) Diesel/Gasoline Non City $175,000.00 $39,951.36 22.83% $135,048.64 $8,403.64 Fuel Station Maintenance $0.00 $1,702.01 100.00% ($1,702.01) $214.00 Advertising $1,500.00 $1,500.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Telephone/Internet $8,800.00 $3,310.24 37.62% $5,489.76 $492.12 Building Maintenance $30,000.00 $9,546.61 31.82% $20,453.39 $1,575.76 HVAC Maintenance $3,872.80 $869.00 22.44% $3,003.80 $0.00 Generator Prevent Maint $700.00 $0.00 0.00% $700.00 $0.00 Tree Care $8,000.00 $2,853.36 35.67% $5,146.64 $750.00 Consulting Services $20,000.00 $392.50 1.96% $19,607.50 $0.00 Equipment Rental/Purchase $2,500.00 $91.67 3.67% $2,408.33 $0.00 Office Equipment Maintnce $1,500.00 $850.75 56.72% $649.25 $376.87 Travel & Training $5,400.00 $892.00 16.52% $4,508.00 $415.00 Utilities - Garage $18,000.00 $6,081.30 33.79% $11,918.70 $1,368.48 Utilities-Garage Heat $17,000.00 $884.11 5.20% $16,115.89 $231.72 Traffic Lights $40,000.00 $8,465.08 21.16% $31,534.92 $1,675.74 Vehicle Replacement $60,000.00 $59,658.00 99.43% $342.00 $0.00 Highway Paving $575,000.00 $47,760.68 8.31% $527,239.32 $33,981.09 Curbs and Sidewalks $10,000.00 $1,326.25 13.26% $8,673.75 $263.75 Total HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT $2,204,753.91 $642,911.45 29.16% $1,561,842.46 $124,249.28 Total STREETS & HIGHWAYS $2,204,753.91 $642,911.45 29.16% $1,561,842.46 $124,249.28 CULTURE AND RECREATION RECREATION ADMINISTRATION Rec.Admin.Salaries-Perm. $207,291.31 $94,257.54 45.47% $113,033.77 $17,142.40 Leave Time Turn-In $5,994.00 $652.07 10.88% $5,341.93 $0.00 Overtime $0.00 $2,558.29 100.00% ($2,558.29) $0.00 FICA/Medicare $15,534.67 $7,553.44 48.62% $7,981.23 $1,367.40 Office Supplies $3,000.00 $1,767.64 58.92% $1,232.36 $592.43 Telephone $1,200.00 $639.73 53.31% $560.27 $114.66 Postage $550.00 $0.00 0.00% $550.00 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $1,075.00 $1,007.50 93.72% $67.50 $40.00 Scholarships $1,000.00 ($81.84) -8.18% $1,081.84 ($81.84) Printing $3,800.00 $7,168.00 188.63% ($3,368.00) $39.00 Software/Printer Contract $4,000.00 $112.72 2.82% $3,887.28 $0.00 Travel & Training $3,400.00 $4,348.86 127.91% ($948.86) $982.03 Lease Printer and Copier $3,540.00 $1,754.87 49.57% $1,785.13 $580.12 Total RECREATION ADMINISTRATION $250,384.98 $121,738.82 48.62% $128,646.16 $20,776.20 PROGRAMS Salaries-Programs $20,000.00 $10,093.75 50.47% $9,906.25 $1,076.70 FICA/Medicare $1,530.00 $706.15 46.15% $823.85 $55.01 Expenditure Report-November, 2015 General Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2016 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-) Paid November General Supplies $14,000.00 $6,845.65 48.90% $7,154.35 $2,147.55 Advertising $2,200.00 $4,551.21 206.87% ($2,351.21) $596.00 Senior Programs $3,000.00 $1,502.91 50.10% $1,497.09 $754.79 Special Events $5,000.00 $1,865.17 37.30% $3,134.83 $526.33 School Use $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,000.00 $0.00 Total PROGRAMS $48,730.00 $25,564.84 52.46% $23,165.16 $5,156.38 FACILITIES Park Salaries $16,000.00 $9,488.95 59.31% $6,511.05 $55.18 FICA/Medicare $1,224.00 $783.83 64.04% $440.17 $0.00 Supplies $9,000.00 $4,449.43 49.44% $4,550.57 $1,631.81 Fuel-Gas $3,000.00 $336.18 11.21% $2,663.82 $86.23 Telephone $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 ($40.00) Facilities Maintenance $2,393.74 $0.00 0.00% $2,393.74 $0.00 Recreation Path Committee $500.00 $0.00 0.00% $500.00 $0.00 Electric-Jaycee Park $1,600.00 $627.19 39.20% $972.81 $141.86 Electric-Dorset Park $2,000.00 $535.22 26.76% $1,464.78 $61.03 Electric-Overlook Park $400.00 $83.53 20.88% $316.47 $7.97 Utilities-Hockey/Skate $400.00 $107.86 26.97% $292.14 $7.30 Electric-Tennis Courts $500.00 $299.37 59.87% $200.63 $37.35 Facilities Improvements $32,000.00 $778.74 2.43% $31,221.26 $132.87 Capital Items $22,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $22,000.00 $0.00 Total FACILITIES $91,017.74 $17,490.30 19.22% $73,527.44 $2,121.60 LEISURE ARTS Chorus Directors $3,600.00 $1,800.00 50.00% $1,800.00 $1,800.00 Total LEISURE ARTS $3,600.00 $1,800.00 50.00% $1,800.00 $1,800.00 SPECIAL ACTIVITIES Adult Programs $28,000.00 $1,805.00 6.45% $26,195.00 $210.00 Jazzercise of Shelburne $8,000.00 $550.00 6.88% $7,450.00 $550.00 Special Events $0.00 $0.00 0.00% $0.00 ($122.88) Swim Lessons-Sport/Fit Ed $3,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,500.00 $0.00 Youth Programs $30,000.00 $5,325.00 17.75% $24,675.00 $2,730.00 Driver's Education $20,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $20,000.00 $0.00 Great Escape Tickets $15,000.00 $5,234.00 34.89% $9,766.00 $0.00 Afternoon Skiing-Middle S $12,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $12,000.00 $0.00 Telephone $1,800.00 $590.30 32.79% $1,209.70 $52.95 Total SPECIAL ACTIVITIES $118,300.00 $13,504.30 11.42% $104,795.70 $3,420.07 COMMUNITY LIBRARY Library Salaries $284,007.82 $119,430.96 42.05% $164,576.86 $23,084.18 FICA/Medicare $21,726.60 $9,397.25 43.25% $12,329.35 $1,815.22 Library Supplies $5,800.00 $2,107.48 36.34% $3,692.52 $303.45 Books - Adult $15,000.00 $5,856.21 39.04% $9,143.79 $931.36 Books - Children $7,550.00 $2,017.74 26.73% $5,532.26 $848.58 DVDs/CDs-Adult $4,500.00 $1,766.88 39.26% $2,733.12 $484.99 DVDs/CDs-Children $1,800.00 $145.24 8.07% $1,654.76 $14.93 Program Supplies-Arts/Cra $2,000.00 $337.87 16.89% $1,662.13 $87.56 Blanchette Expenditures $14,000.00 $4,075.45 29.11% $9,924.55 $1,148.98 Blanchette/Subscriptions- $4,000.00 $1,509.43 37.74% $2,490.57 $0.00 Expenditure Report-November, 2015 General Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2016 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-) Paid November Bookmobile Maintenance $1,000.00 $91.14 9.11% $908.86 $22.88 Postage $2,000.00 ($790.50) -39.53% $2,790.50 $0.00 Dues and Subscriptions $400.00 $40.45 10.11% $359.55 $0.00 Online & Print Subscripti $2,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $2,000.00 $0.00 School Use $62,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $62,500.00 $0.00 Community Programs $6,000.00 $2,027.17 33.79% $3,972.83 $327.17 Computer Operations $9,092.00 $259.62 2.86% $8,832.38 $208.88 Travel & Training $2,000.00 $98.57 4.93% $1,901.43 $76.00 Furniture $1,200.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,200.00 $0.00 Computer Improvements $2,900.00 $16.99 0.59% $2,883.01 $0.00 C/L Photocopier Lease Pri $2,231.00 $827.55 37.09% $1,403.45 $163.87 Total COMMUNITY LIBRARY $451,707.42 $149,215.50 33.03% $302,491.92 $29,518.05 CAPITAL/PARK MAINTENANCE Park Maint.Salaries-Perm. $170,117.14 $74,608.04 43.86% $95,509.10 $13,045.79 FICA/Medicare $12,863.65 $6,094.74 47.38% $6,768.91 $1,063.17 Park Supplies $21,000.00 $11,225.10 53.45% $9,774.90 $1,323.08 Cemetery Supplies $300.00 $0.00 0.00% $300.00 $0.00 Homestead at Wheeler Park $0.00 $223.75 100.00% ($223.75) ($125.58) Veterans Memorial Park $3,500.00 $490.00 14.00% $3,010.00 $0.00 Total CAPITAL/PARK MAINTENANCE $207,780.79 $92,641.63 44.59% $115,139.16 $15,306.46 Total CULTURE AND RECREATION $1,171,520.93 $421,955.39 36.02% $749,565.54 $78,098.76 OTHER OPERATING ENTITIES County Court $124,300.00 $131,945.22 106.15% ($7,645.22) $0.00 Winooski Valley Park $54,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $54,000.00 $0.00 C.C.T.A. $453,352.00 $302,258.00 66.67% $151,094.00 $151,129.00 Regional Planning $36,373.00 $36,373.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Total OTHER OPERATING ENTITIES $668,025.00 $470,576.22 70.44% $197,448.78 $151,129.00 Total OTHER ENTITIES $668,025.00 $470,576.22 70.44% $197,448.78 $151,129.00 CURRENT PRINCIPAL, BONDS Public Works Facility $98,568.00 $98,568.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Kennedy Dr Reconstrction $22,440.00 $22,508.00 100.30% ($68.00) $0.00 Lime Kiln Bridge $22,440.00 $22,508.00 100.30% ($68.00) $0.00 PENSION LIABILITY-PRINCIP $262,974.00 $0.00 0.00% $262,974.00 $0.00 F/D Building Improvements $30,090.00 $30,005.00 99.72% $85.00 $0.00 Police Headquarters $360,000.00 $360,000.00 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Total CURRENT PRINCIPAL, BONDS $796,512.00 $533,589.00 66.99% $262,923.00 $0.00 CURRENT INTEREST, BONDS Public Works Facility $30,148.99 $16,408.61 54.43% $13,740.38 $0.00 Sewer Note-Police Fitup $69,568.30 $0.00 0.00% $69,568.30 $0.00 Kennedy Dr Recnstrction $10,182.15 $3,955.40 38.85% $6,226.75 $0.00 Lime Kiln Bridge $10,182.15 $3,955.40 38.85% $6,226.75 $0.00 PENSION LIABILITY-INTERES $397,975.00 $0.00 0.00% $397,975.00 $0.00 Sewer Note-Solar Array $13,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $13,000.00 $0.00 F/D Building Improvements $13,653.34 $5,272.87 38.62% $8,380.47 $0.00 Police Headquarters $239,292.00 $122,148.00 51.05% $117,144.00 $0.00 Expenditure Report-November, 2015 General Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2016 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-) Paid November Total CURRENT INTEREST, BONDS $784,001.93 $151,740.28 19.35% $632,261.65 $0.00 Total GENERAL FUND $21,153,145.24 $8,637,658.87 40.83% $12,515,486.37 $1,313,396.19 Total All Funds $21,153,145.24 $8,637,658.87 40.83% $12,515,486.37 $1,313,396.19 Expenditure Report-November, 2015 Sewer Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2016 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid November W/POLLUTION CONTROL EXPS. Salaries-Permanent $413,474.41 $165,494.48 40.03% $247,979.93 $30,148.70 Payment to Highway-wages $280,000.29 $3,496.02 1.25% $276,504.27 $692.28 Salaries-Overtime $40,000.00 $12,049.69 30.12% $27,950.31 $3,322.08 Payroll Svc & Testing to $700.00 $0.00 0.00% $700.00 $0.00 PAFO Certification $9,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $9,000.00 $0.00 Sick Bank Payouts $10,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $10,000.00 $0.00 Fringe Benefits $600.00 $0.00 0.00% $600.00 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $30,158.05 $13,782.14 45.70% $16,375.91 $2,599.36 Payment to Highway-FICA/M $21,420.02 $0.00 0.00% $21,420.02 $0.00 Vision Plan $719.64 $281.30 39.09% $438.34 $56.26 Disability Income $1,515.36 $479.15 31.62% $1,036.21 $95.83 Long Term Disability Insu $0.00 $833.05 100.00% ($833.05) $166.61 Group Health Insurance $99,399.48 $38,321.60 38.55% $61,077.88 $8,283.19 Benefit Reimbursed to Hig $73,274.65 $0.00 0.00% $73,274.65 $0.00 Group Life Insurance $858.00 $477.75 55.68% $380.25 $95.55 Group Dental Insurance $4,905.99 $3,123.15 63.66% $1,782.84 $951.83 Pension $68,258.44 $10,153.81 14.88% $58,104.63 $0.00 ICMA Match $21,332.17 $4,080.33 19.13% $17,251.84 $806.24 Pension Payment to Highwa $81,640.00 $0.00 0.00% $81,640.00 $0.00 Pension Note Payment $38,675.00 $0.00 0.00% $38,675.00 $0.00 Office Supplies $1,500.00 $643.07 42.87% $856.93 $0.00 Plant Supplies $70,000.00 $25,822.06 36.89% $44,177.94 $3,694.57 Ferrous Chloride $500.00 $0.00 0.00% $500.00 $0.00 Polymer $68,000.00 $42,783.81 62.92% $25,216.19 $0.00 Sewer Line Maint/Supplies $15,000.00 $7,494.68 49.96% $7,505.32 $2,496.58 Pumping Station Supplies $22,500.00 $1,118.80 4.97% $21,381.20 $200.00 Laboratory Supplies $7,500.00 $4,515.88 60.21% $2,984.12 $240.57 Paint and Hardware $300.00 $0.00 0.00% $300.00 $0.00 Caustic Soda and Lime $60,000.00 $21,207.54 35.35% $38,792.46 $6,048.21 Alum $38,000.00 $29,822.88 78.48% $8,177.12 $7,180.12 Water-Airport-B/B-Pump $1,500.00 $250.61 16.71% $1,249.39 $27.54 Generator Preventive Main $4,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $4,000.00 $0.00 Clothing Supplies $3,600.00 $709.95 19.72% $2,890.05 $285.00 Truck Parts $7,000.00 $4,208.26 60.12% $2,791.74 $516.49 Gas - Diesel Fuel - Oil $17,000.00 $4,528.82 26.64% $12,471.18 $1,438.59 Fuel - Airport Parkway $50,000.00 $5,286.27 10.57% $44,713.73 $2,108.33 Fuel - Bartlett Bay $6,000.00 $176.85 2.95% $5,823.15 $37.40 Advertising $0.00 $127.60 100.00% ($127.60) $0.00 Telephone and Alarms $5,500.00 $2,646.68 48.12% $2,853.32 $1,320.23 Postage $100.00 $9.80 9.80% $90.20 $0.00 Memberships/Dues $300.00 $0.00 0.00% $300.00 $0.00 Discharge Permits $8,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $8,000.00 $0.00 Workers Comp Insurance $20,168.72 $8,142.12 40.37% $12,026.60 $0.00 Property Insurance $55,114.04 $18,541.64 33.64% $36,572.40 $0.00 Unemployment Insurance $0.00 $620.64 100.00% ($620.64) $310.32 Safety $0.00 $53.68 100.00% ($53.68) $0.00 Billing Payment to CWD $40,550.00 $20,275.00 50.00% $20,275.00 $20,275.00 Soil/Sludge Management $100,000.00 $37,076.99 37.08% $62,923.01 $13,254.85 Discharge Water Testing $1,250.00 $516.00 41.28% $734.00 $177.00 Landfill Fees $4,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $4,000.00 $0.00 HVAC Maintenance $10,153.74 $4,939.29 48.65% $5,214.45 $0.00 Auditing $6,214.00 $0.00 0.00% $6,214.00 $0.00 Engineering/Consulting $45,000.00 $12,214.00 27.14% $32,786.00 $0.00 Expenditure Report-November, 2015 Sewer Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2016 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-)Paid November Landfill Engineering $8,000.00 $2,303.00 28.79% $5,697.00 $0.00 PMT TO STORMWATER-GIS $4,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $4,000.00 $0.00 Office Equipment Contract $500.00 $91.67 18.33% $408.33 $0.00 Wireless Communication $500.00 $207.96 41.59% $292.04 $51.99 Administrative Services $150,335.71 $0.00 0.00% $150,335.71 $0.00 IT Service $3,500.00 $462.46 13.21% $3,037.54 $0.00 Burlington Sewer Lines $215,000.00 $120,082.36 55.85% $94,917.64 $0.00 Travel & Training $0.00 $433.75 100.00% ($433.75) $0.00 Utilities-Pumping Station $60,000.00 $16,916.09 28.19% $43,083.91 $3,320.21 Utilities--L/Fill Station $5,500.00 $458.36 8.33% $5,041.64 $458.36 Electric-Airport Parkway $175,000.00 $66,436.85 37.96% $108,563.15 $0.00 Electric-Bartlett Bay $115,000.00 $37,074.16 32.24% $77,925.84 $9,014.76 Replacement-Vehicles $250,000.00 $239,817.74 95.93% $10,182.26 $97,542.00 Building Improvements $7,500.00 $2,011.17 26.82% $5,488.83 $2,011.17 Pumps Replacements $70,000.00 $14,106.70 20.15% $55,893.30 $10,856.70 Pump Repairs $30,000.00 $32,493.56 108.31% ($2,493.56) $13,722.91 Loan for Airport Parkway $1,272,059.74 $0.00 0.00% $1,272,059.74 $0.00 Bartlett Bay Bond Replace $245,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $245,000.00 $0.00 Xfer to Undesignated Rese $4,481.14 $0.00 0.00% $4,481.14 $0.00 Capital Improvements-CIP $335,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $335,000.00 $0.00 Total W/POLLUTION CONTROL EXPS. $4,816,058.59 $1,039,201.22 21.58% $3,776,857.37 $243,806.83 Total ENTERPRISE FUND/W.P.C. $4,816,058.59 $1,039,201.22 21.58% $3,776,857.37 $243,806.83 Total All Funds $4,816,058.59 $1,039,201.22 21.58% $3,776,857.37 $243,806.83 Expenditure Report-November, 2015 Stormwater Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2016 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-) Paid November S/WATER UTILITIES EXPS Salaries-Permanent $327,310.72 $133,106.97 40.67% $194,203.75 $25,949.36 Leave Time Turn-In $3,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,000.00 $0.00 Salaries-Overtime $20,000.00 $874.25 4.37% $19,125.75 $81.19 Payroll Svc & Testing to $480.00 $0.00 0.00% $480.00 $0.00 Fringe Benefits $2,310.00 $300.00 12.99% $2,010.00 $0.00 FICA/Medicare $24,822.31 $11,598.93 46.73% $13,223.38 $2,243.87 Vision Plan $690.07 $153.40 22.23% $536.67 $30.68 Disability Income Insuran $3,570.40 $390.80 10.95% $3,179.60 $78.16 Group Health Insurance $76,692.00 $21,837.90 28.47% $54,854.10 $4,346.81 Reimburse to Highway Bene $9,125.00 $0.00 0.00% $9,125.00 $0.00 Health Insurance FICA $867.51 $0.00 0.00% $867.51 $0.00 Group Life Insurance $945.00 $404.25 42.78% $540.75 $80.85 Group Dental Insurance $5,409.66 $2,053.01 37.95% $3,356.65 $566.38 Pension $31,659.03 $0.00 0.00% $31,659.03 $0.00 ICMA Match $17,569.78 $6,325.74 36.00% $11,244.04 $1,338.24 Pension Note Payment $26,510.00 $0.00 0.00% $26,510.00 $0.00 Office Supplies $2,250.00 $1,130.21 50.23% $1,119.79 $33.64 Small Equipment/Tools $4,000.00 $287.95 7.20% $3,712.05 $0.00 Uniforms/Supplies $3,707.25 $1,940.99 52.36% $1,766.26 $676.93 Gasoline $4,500.00 $942.71 20.95% $3,557.29 $104.99 Oil $350.00 $25.52 7.29% $324.48 $0.00 Diesel Fuel $8,000.00 $2,916.12 36.45% $5,083.88 $707.19 Permit Requirement-Educat $12,700.00 $2,100.00 16.54% $10,600.00 $0.00 Telephone $2,400.00 $996.91 41.54% $1,403.09 $126.29 Postage $200.00 $16.99 8.50% $183.01 $0.00 Membership/Dues $400.00 $57.00 14.25% $343.00 $0.00 Discharge Permits Renewal $7,500.00 $348.80 4.65% $7,151.20 $78.40 Workers Comp Insurance $6,789.30 $2,094.64 30.85% $4,694.66 $0.00 Property Insurance $21,231.30 $2,260.08 10.65% $18,971.22 $0.00 Unemployment Insurance $2,000.00 $620.62 31.03% $1,379.38 $310.31 GIS-Fees/Software $12,000.00 $1,166.69 9.72% $10,833.31 $20.04 Sediment & Depris Disposa $750.00 $20.06 2.67% $729.94 $20.06 Water Quality Monitoring $10,000.00 $17,194.48 171.94% ($7,194.48) $6,072.47 Building/Grounds Maint $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,500.00 $0.00 Vehicle Maintenance $7,500.00 $2,082.46 27.77% $5,417.54 $1,082.23 Storm System Maint Materi $60,000.00 $11,617.68 19.36% $48,382.32 $2,842.46 Printing $100.00 $155.55 155.55% ($55.55) $0.00 Legal Services $15,000.00 $2,305.50 15.37% $12,694.50 $1,022.25 To GF-Audit and Actuary $3,555.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,555.00 $0.00 Engineering-Watershed $28,000.00 $2,810.56 10.04% $25,189.44 $0.00 Engineering-Nghbrhd Asst $24,000.00 $12,342.53 51.43% $11,657.47 $1,227.63 Billing Payment CWD $40,550.00 $20,275.00 50.00% $20,275.00 $20,275.00 Office Equipment Maintena $750.00 $91.67 12.22% $658.33 $0.00 Equipment Rental $1,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,500.00 $0.00 Administrative Services $134,391.55 $0.00 0.00% $134,391.55 $0.00 Conference/Training Expen $3,000.00 $364.99 12.17% $2,635.01 $350.00 S/W Bldg Utilities $3,500.00 $759.98 21.71% $2,740.02 $174.84 Expenditure Report-November, 2015 Stormwater Fund Year-to-Date % Budget FY 2016 Account Budget Expenditures Expended $ (+/-) Paid November Stormwater Pumps Electric $480.00 $70.17 14.62% $409.83 $0.00 Vehicles/Equipment $200,000.00 $339,905.67 169.95% ($139,905.67) $60,893.00 Stormwater Capital Projec $643,000.00 $351,657.89 54.69% $291,342.11 $5,310.52 Office Furniture/Equipmen $1,000.00 $129.18 12.92% $870.82 $0.00 Project Notes Princ/Inter $100,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $100,000.00 $0.00 Flow Restoration Plan Ana $75,000.00 $33,132.33 44.18% $41,867.67 $0.00 Reimbursement to Highway $5,605.51 $0.00 0.00% $5,605.51 $0.00 Undesignated Reserve $178,678.17 $0.00 0.00% $178,678.17 $0.00 Total S/WATER UTILITIES EXPS $2,176,849.56 $988,866.18 45.43% $1,187,983.38 $136,043.79 Total STORM WATER UTILITIES $2,176,849.56 $988,866.18 45.43% $1,187,983.38 $136,043.79 Total All Funds $2,176,849.56 $988,866.18 45.43% $1,187,983.38 $136,043.79 Revenue Report-November, 2015 General Fund Estimated Received % Budget FY 2016 Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-November Total PROPERTY TAX REVENUE $13,383,284.33 ($8,418,085.07) 62.90% $4,965,199.26 ($3,829,762.45) Total LOCAL OPTION TAXES $3,661,405.84 ($1,372,047.50) 37.47% $2,289,358.34 ($978,456.86) Total TAX REVENUE $17,044,690.17 ($9,790,132.57) 57.44% $7,254,557.60 ($4,808,219.31) Total INTEREST/PENALTY ON TAX $254,950.00 ($93,031.73) 36.49% $161,918.27 ($46,831.80) Total CITY MANAGER $468,885.26 ($1.00) 0.00% $468,884.26 $0.00 Total CITY CLERK $257,500.00 ($73,043.52) 28.37% $184,456.48 ($10,451.71) Total PLANNING & ZONING $321,700.00 ($158,716.48) 49.34% $162,983.52 ($21,488.80) Total FIRE DEPARTMENT $304,000.00 ($113,277.31) 37.26% $190,722.69 ($13,690.07) Total AMBULANCE $719,000.00 ($403,256.80) 56.09% $315,743.20 ($57,502.53) Total POLICE DEPARTMENT $455,169.34 ($55,250.33) 12.14% $399,919.01 ($6,486.30) Total PUBLIC SAFETY $1,478,169.34 ($571,784.44) 38.68% $906,384.90 ($77,678.90) Total HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT $1,099,065.47 ($258,882.99) 23.55% $840,182.48 ($22,701.44) Total RED ROCKS PARK $4,500.00 ($8,623.00) 191.62% ($4,123.00) $0.00 Total FACILITIES $500.00 ($200.00) 40.00% $300.00 ($40.00) Total SPECIAL ACTIVITIES $192,000.00 ($66,694.00) 34.74% $125,306.00 ($21,531.00) Total RECREATION $197,000.00 ($75,517.00) 38.33% $121,483.00 ($21,571.00) Total COMMUNITY LIBRARY $31,185.00 ($21,822.99) 69.98% $9,362.01 $10.97 Total GENERAL FUND $21,153,145.24 ($11,042,932.72) 52.20% $10,110,212.52 ($5,008,931.99) Revenue Report-November, 2015 General Fund Estimated Received % Budget FY 2016 MTD Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-November TAX REVENUE Tax, Current Budget $13,272,284.33 ($8,369,673.29) 63.06% $4,902,611.04 ($3,788,035.45) VT Payment in Lieu of Tax $40,000.00 ($48,411.78) 121.03% ($8,411.78) ($41,727.00) Taxes, Reappraisal/ACT 60 $71,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $71,000.00 $0.00 Total TAX REVENUE $13,383,284.33 ($8,418,085.07) 62.90% $4,965,199.26 ($3,829,762.45) LOCAL OPTION TAXES Local Option Tax-Sales $2,683,090.12 ($999,300.23) 37.24% $1,683,789.89 ($708,402.49) Local Option Tax-Rooms/Me $265,657.72 ($372,747.27) 140.31% ($107,089.55) ($270,054.37) Rooms/Meals - Fire Vehicl $352,658.00 $0.00 0.00% $352,658.00 $0.00 Rooms/Meals - P/D Hdqtrs $360,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $360,000.00 $0.00 Total LOCAL OPTION TAXES $3,661,405.84 ($1,372,047.50) 37.47% $2,289,358.34 ($978,456.86) Total TAX REVENUE $17,044,690.17 ($9,790,132.57) 57.44% $7,254,557.60 ($4,808,219.31) INTEREST/PENALTY ON TAX Penalty, Current & Prior $125,000.00 ($73,935.11) 59.15% $51,064.89 ($40,397.26) Interest, Current & Prior $35,000.00 ($18,109.91) 51.74% $16,890.09 ($6,243.67) Abatements/Write-offs $0.00 $2,437.07 100.00% $2,437.07 $0.00 Attorney Fees $2,500.00 ($3,423.78) 136.95% ($923.78) ($190.87) Fee to Collect State Educ $76,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $76,000.00 $0.00 Current Use $16,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $16,000.00 $0.00 Per Parcel Payment Traini $450.00 $0.00 0.00% $450.00 $0.00 Total INTEREST/PENALTY ON TAX $254,950.00 ($93,031.73) 36.49% $161,918.27 ($46,831.80) CITY MANAGER Administrative Services-W $57,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $57,500.00 $0.00 Administrative Services-S $134,391.55 $0.00 0.00% $134,391.55 $0.00 Administrative Services-W $150,335.71 $0.00 0.00% $150,335.71 $0.00 From Sewer-Audit & Actuar $6,214.00 $0.00 0.00% $6,214.00 $0.00 From SW-Audit & Actuary $3,555.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,555.00 $0.00 Pension Liab Note-WPC $38,675.00 $0.00 0.00% $38,675.00 $0.00 Pension Liab Note-SW $26,510.00 $0.00 0.00% $26,510.00 $0.00 From Water-Audit $2,100.00 $0.00 0.00% $2,100.00 $0.00 Admin Svc Fee Fund 240 $31,424.00 $0.00 0.00% $31,424.00 $0.00 From WPC-Payroll, Testing $700.00 $0.00 0.00% $700.00 $0.00 From SW-Payroll, Testing $480.00 $0.00 0.00% $480.00 $0.00 Non-Profit Leases $0.00 ($1.00) 100.00% ($1.00) $0.00 Workers' Comp. Reimburse. $15,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $15,000.00 $0.00 Miscellaneous $2,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $2,000.00 $0.00 Total CITY MANAGER $468,885.26 ($1.00) 0.00% $468,884.26 $0.00 CITY CLERK Recording Fees $145,000.00 ($51,523.00) 35.53% $93,477.00 ($7,418.00) Photocopy Fees $25,000.00 ($9,698.10) 38.79% $15,301.90 ($1,899.90) Photocopies-Vital Records $6,000.00 ($2,286.00) 38.10% $3,714.00 ($432.00) Pet Licenses $28,000.00 ($1,256.00) 4.49% $26,744.00 ($46.00) Pet Control Fees $6,000.00 ($595.00) 9.92% $5,405.00 $0.00 Beverage/Cabaret License $7,000.00 ($185.00) 2.64% $6,815.00 $0.00 Entertainment Permits $1,500.00 ($100.00) 6.67% $1,400.00 ($25.00) Revenue Report-November, 2015 General Fund Estimated Received % Budget FY 2016 MTD Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-November Marriage Licenses $1,500.00 ($840.00) 56.00% $660.00 ($40.00) Green Mountain Passports $300.00 ($168.00) 56.00% $132.00 ($8.00) Motor Vehicle Renewals $1,000.00 ($357.00) 35.70% $643.00 ($45.00) School Reimburse-Election $1,200.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,200.00 $0.00 Interest on Investments $35,000.00 ($6,035.42) 17.24% $28,964.58 ($537.81) Total CITY CLERK $257,500.00 ($73,043.52) 28.37% $184,456.48 ($10,451.71) PLANNING Building & Sign Permits $212,500.00 ($112,998.34) 53.18% $99,501.66 ($7,467.70) Bianchi Ruling $8,000.00 ($5,046.00) 63.08% $2,954.00 ($807.00) Zoning and Planning $85,000.00 ($38,402.14) 45.18% $46,597.86 ($12,794.10) Sewer Inspection Fees $0.00 ($1,800.00) 100.00% ($1,800.00) ($200.00) Peddlers' Permits $1,200.00 ($470.00) 39.17% $730.00 ($220.00) Market Street Grant $15,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $15,000.00 $0.00 Total PLANNING $321,700.00 ($158,716.48) 49.34% $162,983.52 ($21,488.80) FIRE DEPARTMENT Outside Employment $4,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $4,000.00 $0.00 Fire Inspection Revenue $300,000.00 ($113,277.31) 37.76% $186,722.69 ($13,690.07) Total FIRE DEPARTMENT $304,000.00 ($113,277.31) 37.26% $190,722.69 ($13,690.07) AMBULANCE Tax Revenues $155,000.00 ($155,000.00) 100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Ambulance Service Billing $540,000.00 ($232,030.10) 42.97% $307,969.90 ($52,867.44) Williston Billing $18,000.00 ($7,425.91) 41.26% $10,574.09 ($3,112.91) Grand Isle Billing $6,000.00 ($2,650.79) 44.18% $3,349.21 ($772.18) Miscellaneous Income $0.00 ($6,150.00) 100.00% ($6,150.00) ($750.00) Total AMBULANCE $719,000.00 ($403,256.80) 56.09% $315,743.20 ($57,502.53) POLICE DEPARTMENT Vermont District Court $70,000.00 ($21,471.85) 30.67% $48,528.15 ($4,678.00) C.U.S.I. Overtime Grant $0.00 ($3,817.00) 100.00% ($3,817.00) $0.00 Police Reports $7,500.00 ($3,022.00) 40.29% $4,478.00 ($205.00) Criminal Investigations $0.00 ($804.38) 100.00% ($804.38) ($804.38) Drug Task Force Grant $93,000.00 ($17,064.07) 18.35% $75,935.93 $0.00 Parking Tickets $0.00 ($115.00) 100.00% ($115.00) ($5.00) Alarm Registrations $10,000.00 ($5,985.00) 59.85% $4,015.00 ($90.00) Alarm Fines $5,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $5,500.00 $0.00 Off Duty Police $30,000.00 ($2,880.29) 9.60% $27,119.71 ($683.92) Bullet Proof Vest Grant $3,200.00 $0.00 0.00% $3,200.00 $0.00 COPS Grant $37,500.00 $0.00 0.00% $37,500.00 $0.00 Police Impact Fees $75,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $75,000.00 $0.00 3rd Floor Lease Revenue $103,469.34 $0.00 0.00% $103,469.34 $0.00 Miscellaneous - Police $0.00 ($90.74) 100.00% ($90.74) ($20.00) Xfer In-Fund 207 $20,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $20,000.00 $0.00 Total POLICE DEPARTMENT $455,169.34 ($55,250.33) 12.14% $399,919.01 ($6,486.30) HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Road Opening Permits $135,000.00 ($78,323.00) 58.02% $56,677.00 ($13,529.50) Overweight truck permits $1,700.00 ($145.00) 8.53% $1,555.00 ($25.00) Revenue Report-November, 2015 General Fund Estimated Received % Budget FY 2016 MTD Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-November Highway State Aid $212,000.00 ($127,076.73) 59.94% $84,923.27 $0.00 Fuel Pump Surcharge $1,000.00 ($2,265.49) 226.55% ($1,265.49) ($463.44) HazMat Facility Lease $18,800.00 ($10,666.92) 56.74% $8,133.08 $0.00 School Bus Parts Reimbure $32,500.00 ($1,593.64) 4.90% $30,906.36 ($267.89) School gas/diesel reimbur $175,000.00 ($31,483.85) 17.99% $143,516.15 ($6,940.35) School vehicle repair pay $19,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $19,000.00 $0.00 Salary Reimbursement-WPC $280,000.29 $0.00 0.00% $280,000.29 $0.00 FICA Reimbursement-WPC $21,420.02 $0.00 0.00% $21,420.02 $0.00 Pension Reimbursement-WPC $81,640.00 $0.00 0.00% $81,640.00 $0.00 Benefits Reimbursement-WP $73,274.65 $0.00 0.00% $73,274.65 $0.00 Salary Reimbursement-SW $5,605.51 $0.00 0.00% $5,605.51 $0.00 Benefits Reimbursement-SW $9,125.00 $0.00 0.00% $9,125.00 $0.00 Reimburse from Fund 265 $8,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $8,000.00 $0.00 Highway Impact Fee-RT 2 $5,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $5,000.00 $0.00 Hgwy Misc Revenue $20,000.00 ($7,328.36) 36.64% $12,671.64 ($1,475.26) Total HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT $1,099,065.47 ($258,882.99) 23.55% $840,182.48 ($22,701.44) RECREATION RED ROCKS PARK Red Rocks Gate Receipts $4,500.00 ($8,623.00) 191.62% ($4,123.00) $0.00 Total RED ROCKS PARK $4,500.00 ($8,623.00) 191.62% ($4,123.00) $0.00 FACILITIES J/C Park Rentals $500.00 ($200.00) 40.00% $300.00 ($40.00) Total FACILITIES $500.00 ($200.00) 40.00% $300.00 ($40.00) SPECIAL ACTIVITIES Great Escape Ticket Sales $15,000.00 ($5,234.00) 34.89% $9,766.00 $0.00 Aternoon Skiing/Middle Sc $0.00 ($8,680.00) 100.00% ($8,680.00) ($8,680.00) Youth Programs $116,000.00 ($42,501.00) 36.64% $73,499.00 ($10,817.00) Adult Evening Classes $43,000.00 ($10,279.00) 23.90% $32,721.00 ($2,034.00) Recreation Impact Fees $18,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $18,000.00 $0.00 Total SPECIAL ACTIVITIES $192,000.00 ($66,694.00) 34.74% $125,306.00 ($21,531.00) Total RECREATION $197,000.00 ($75,517.00) 38.33% $121,483.00 ($21,571.00) COMMUNITY LIBRARY Library Lost Books $1,000.00 ($333.04) 33.30% $666.96 $10.97 Fines and Fees $3,200.00 ($2,018.35) 63.07% $1,181.65 $0.00 Non-Resident Fees $750.00 ($325.00) 43.33% $425.00 $0.00 Blanchette Gift $18,000.00 ($18,100.00) 100.56% ($100.00) $0.00 Libriary Copies and Print $1,500.00 ($1,046.60) 69.77% $453.40 $0.00 Xfer in-Fund 603 $6,735.00 $0.00 0.00% $6,735.00 $0.00 Total COMMUNITY LIBRARY $31,185.00 ($21,822.99) 69.98% $9,362.01 $10.97 Total GENERAL FUND $21,153,145.24 ($11,042,932.72) 52.20% $10,110,212.52 ($5,008,931.99) Total All Funds $21,153,145.24 ($11,042,932.72) 52.20% $10,110,212.52 ($5,008,931.99) Revenue Report-November, 2015 Sewer Fund Estimated Received % Budget FY 2016 MTD Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)eceived-November WATER POLLUTION CONTROL CHARGES FOR SERVICES W.P.C. User Fees $3,371,929.29 ($1,404,231.82) 41.64% $1,967,697.47 ($255,840.76) W.P.C. Truck Charges $100,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $100,000.00 $0.00 Connection Fees $143,819.30 ($217,057.52) 150.92% ($73,238.22) ($10,003.40) Enviromental Impact $50,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $50,000.00 $0.00 Total CHARGES FOR SERVICES $3,665,748.59 ($1,621,289.34) 44.23% $2,044,459.25 ($265,844.16) BOND AND LOAN PROCEEDS State Revolving Fund $385,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $385,000.00 $0.00 Colchester A/P Pkwy Pmt $742,310.00 $0.00 0.00% $742,310.00 $0.00 GF Note Repay-Solar $13,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $13,000.00 $0.00 Total BOND AND LOAN PROCEEDS $1,140,310.00 $0.00 0.00% $1,140,310.00 $0.00 MISCELLANEOUS Miscellaneous Rev.-W.P.C. $10,000.00 ($1,303.02) 13.03% $8,696.98 ($107.79) Total MISCELLANEOUS $10,000.00 ($1,303.02) 13.03% $8,696.98 ($107.79) Total OPERATING TRANSFERS IN $4,816,058.59 ($1,622,592.36) 33.69% $3,193,466.23 ($265,951.95) Total ENTERPRISE FUND/W.P.C. $4,816,058.59 ($1,622,592.36) 33.69% $3,193,466.23 ($265,951.95) Total All Funds $4,816,058.59 ($1,622,592.36) 33.69% $3,193,466.23 ($265,951.95) Revenue Report-November, 2015 Stormwater Fund Estimated Received % Budget FY 2016 MTD Account Revenue To Date Received $ (+/-)Received-November S/WATER UTILITIES REVENUE Intergovernmental Revenue $0.00 $14,795.21 100.00% $14,795.21 $0.00 S/W User Fees - Water Bil $2,060,549.56 ($714,887.63) 34.69% $1,345,661.93 ($103,451.80) Payment from GF re: GIS $37,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $37,000.00 $0.00 State of VT Fee for Servi $50,000.00 $0.00 0.00% $50,000.00 $0.00 Land Owner Payments $29,300.00 $0.00 0.00% $29,300.00 $0.00 Homeowner's Assoc Fee $0.00 ($11,535.51) 100.00% ($11,535.51) $0.00 Total S/WATER UTILITIES REVENUE $2,176,849.56 ($711,627.93) 32.69% $1,465,221.63 ($103,451.80) Total STORM WATER UTILITIES $2,176,849.56 ($711,627.93) 32.69% $1,465,221.63 ($103,451.80) Total All Funds $2,176,849.56 ($711,627.93) 32.69% $1,465,221.63 ($103,451.80)