Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Minutes - City Council - 12/07/2015
CITY COUNCIL 7 DECEMBER 2015 The South Burlington City Council held a regular meeting on Monday, 7 December 2015, at 6:00 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. MEMBERS PRESENT: P. Nowak, Chair; H. Riehle, C. Shaw, M. Emery, T. Chittenden ALSO PRESENT: K. Dorn, City Manager; T. Hubbard, Deputy City Manager; P. Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning; I. Blanchard, Project Manager; J. Rabidoux, Director of Public Works; M. Leugers, Recreation Director; C. Ingalls, City Manager’s Office; Brig. Gen. Clark; Col. Guinee and other members of the Vermont Air National Guard; J. Kochman, J. Goodman, B. Servis, C. Sargent, M. Simoneau, B. Nowak, G. Maille, T. Harrington, E. Levite, J. Sesani, E. Unerlee, M. Mahoney 1. Discussion of labor relations agreement with South Burlington Career Firefighters’ Association IAFF Local 3671. Possible executive session to consider labor relations agreement with employees. 1VSA, Section 313(a)(1)(B): Ms. Riehle moved that premature general public knowledge of the City’s position in negotiation of a labor relations agreement with South Burlington Career Firefighters’ Association IAFF Local 3671 would clearly place the City at a substantial disadvantage. Ms. Emery seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Ms. Emery moved that the Council enter into executive session to discuss negotiation of the City’s labor relations agreement with South Burlington Career Firefighters’ Association IAFF local 3671 under 1 VSA, Section 313(a)(1)(B). Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Regular Session resumed at 6:58 p.m. 2. Agenda Review: Additions, deletions or changes in order of agenda items: No changes were made to the Agenda. 3. Comments & Questions from the public not related to the agenda: Mr. Paquette said he is developing a clean city survey and explained what will be included in the survey. He said the aim is to make South Burlington the cleanest city in the U.S. Members then agreed to reverse the next two agenda items due to a timing issue. 4. Capital Improvement Program Public Hearing and possible approval of FY17 projects: Ms. Blanchard noted that the CIP is updated annually with input from departments and committees and in response to identified infrastructure needs. Ms. Blanchard then explained that in order to meet the 3% budget target, the amount allocated to the City Center reserve fund was reduced from $860,000 to $735,000. That money is to be used for the city’s share of a Library, Williston Road streetscape, possibly a City Hall which is not covered by the TIF. Ms. Emery asked if there is a delayed project, would those reserve funds be rolled over to the next year. Ms. Blanchard said they would be. Ms. Blanchard then reviewed highway expenditures for FY17 and Fire and Ambulance expenditures including repayment of a debt. Mr. Shaw asked about the fit- up for Fire Station #2. Ms. Blanchard said that will come from Fire Impact fees. Ms. Nowak asked if FY17 ends with a surplus whether that can be applied to the reserve fund. Ms. Blanchard said it can. Mr. Shaw then moved to open the public hearing. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Public comment was solicited. There was none forthcoming. Mr. Shaw moved to close the public hearing. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Ms. Emery then moved to approve the resolution amending the Capital Improvement Program for FY2017 through FY2026. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Announcements and City Manager’s Report: Mr. Dorn: The Steering Committee will meet tomorrow night at the High School for a discussion regarding potential legalization of marijuana in Vermont. There will be a panel of local experts plus input regarding issues that have arisen in Colorado. Council members then reported on meetings and events they had attended. 6. Housing Trust Fund Volunteer Interviews: The Council first interviewed Edward Levite. Mr. Levite, a South Burlington resident for 20 years, works in the mortgage business for Union Bank and has also worked with Champlain Valley Trust to help people get homes. The Council then interviewed Joy Grossman, a South Burlington resident for 4 years. She is working on an MPA at UVM, looking at community development of which affordable housing is a part. Ms. Nowak explained the selection process. 7. Public Hearing and Possible Adoption of Land Development Regulations (Article IX-Southeast Quadrant District & establishment of SEQ-NRN District on the Official Zoning Map) and Official Map (remove a small area on the Wheeler Nature Park from the designation of “existing park and open space”): Mr. Conner noted that these regulations create a new zoning district. Ms. Harrington said this is a result of litigation from 2011. That summer, the Planning Commission warned a public hearing on recommendations from a special committee. This year, the City Council approved a settlement. The regulations create a new zoning district in the Southeast Quadrant (Neighborhood Residential North) which includes sensitivity to the Wheeler Nature Park. Ms. Harrington noted there are three areas of the regulations that speak to height restrictions, specifically limiting development to one-story structures. There are also landscaping options to increase or decrease the buffer. There is language regarding conservation of natural resources, especially maintaining any of the mature trees. Ms. Emery moved to open the public hearing. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Simoneau said he supported the swap and the zoning changes. He noted that the non-binding ballot also included the conservation easement. He asked whether this is “generic” or can it be “fashioned.” Mr. Conner showed the area in question on the map. He said this area is not part of this public hearing, and it will be a choice of the City Council as to how to proceed. Ms. Crocker said she had supported the swap because of the conservation easement. She questioned whether the public vote was binding and wanted to be sure that if the city gives up the 7 acres, there actually is a conservation easement. Ms. Dopp said she felt the conservation easement was part of the deal, and that is why the Land Trust got involved. There was no further public comment. Mr. Shaw moved to close the public hearing. Ms. Emery seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Shaw asked whether there was discussion of the conservation easement on the committee. Ms. Harrington said there was not. Council members felt that they needed a legal opinion from the City Attorney on this issue. They agreed to continue the item until the next Council meeting to get input from the Attorney. 8. Consent Agenda: a. Sign Disbursement b. Approve Minutes for 16 November 2015 It was noted that the principal speaker for Channel 17 was Lauren-Glenn Davitian. Ms. Emery moved to approve the Consent Agenda with the above addition. Mr. Chittenden seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. Consider and possibly approve resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute certain agreements with Altrus Power America, Inc., and South Burlington School district to develop and operate a net-metering solar array on the City Landfill: Mr. Dorn reviewed the history and noted that the Energy Committee is highly supportive of the agreement. Ms. Blanchard then reviewed the specific agreements and noted these are better terms than the previous company offered. Power will be shared with the School District. The first year savings is estimated at $80,000. Mr. Chittenden noted there is an option that any time after 6 years the city can buy the equipment. He asked if that would be attractive. Ms. Blanchard said it could be if the cost of energy increases significantly. Ms. Nowak asked if there is anything to protect the city in case Altrus goes bankrupt. Ms. Blanchard said the Public Service Board addresses that. Mr. Rabidoux explained how the panels are distributed. He said nobody believes this installation presents a threat to the cap of the landfill. If the land settles and panels tilt, Altrus can go on the property and adjust them. Mr. Rabidoux added that Altrus did not object to any of the city’s concerns regarding liability. He added that with any new technology, you apply the best science. Ms. Emery then moved to approve the Resolution authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and execute certain agreements with Altrus Power America, Inc., and South Burlington School district, deleting the second to last “whereas.” Mr. Chittenden seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10. Consider Recreation and Leisure Arts Committee recommendation regarding improvements to Baycrest Park: Mr. Sproul reviewed the history of the park area, noting that the land is city owned with neighbors on two sides and across the street. Some neighbors asked for the area to become a usable park, but not everyone favored this. After several meetings, a concept for the park was approved by the Recreation and Leisure Arts Committee. Mr. Sproul then showed the plan. It includes 3 trees on the border next to the road and an access path from the crosswalk along a central undeveloped area. The path would continue across a small bridge. There would also be a relatively small play area with swings and a natural play site that would blend in with the environment. There would also be a bike rack and a sign near the entrance. Ms. Leugers then showed a view from the path toward the play area and also a concept for the natural play area. Mr. Chittenden asked about the hours of operation. Mr. Hubbard said the Parks Ordinance allows the City Council to establish hours for use of the park. Mr. Sproul noted that private donor is willing to make a significant contribution to the establishment of the park. Ms. Riehle commented that the design looks very unintrusive. She noted that the city hopes to entice more families to the city, and having a park near housing is very attractive. It is also good for seniors in the nearby residence to walk over and sit on a bench. Mr. Sproul added that in the Comprehensive Plan there is the aspiration for a park within a quarter mile walking distance of residences. He noted that this is the only area of the city where that doesn’t happen. Ms. Nowak liked that this is kept as a neighborhood space with no large structures. She asked what additional maintenance would be required. Mr. Rabidoux said if it is accessible year-round, they can keep it plowed year round. He added that it is 1/1000 of what they have to do in any other area, and they already mow it. There is no adverse impact. Ms. Davis and Mr. Dufy, residents of the area, spoke in opposition to the park and were particularly concerned with the process. They felt that no one from Pillsbury Manor wanders up to this area because there are benches elsewhere. They didn’t feel a sandbox was “healthy.” They also felt that the path runs through the “backyard of condos.” They also felt that the park area already gets much use. Ms. Nowak said the city is trying to connect various areas. The Council understands that the park area gets used now; however, this is seen as an enhancement. Ms. Emery said there are no intruders there now, and with more active sports (e.g., a basketball court) being removed from the plan, she felt this is a nice compromise. Ms. Kochman of the Recreation and Leisure Arts Committee agreed. Muriel Moore, a resident of the area, spoke in support of the park improvements. She noted there are 223 housing units in the neighborhood and 131 more units proposed very soon. The park is central to all of this housing. She hoped it would bring more young families to the neighborhood. The Council agreed to continue the discussion at the second meeting in January. 11. City Council Discussion with Invited Representatives from VTANG and BTV: Ms. Nowak noted that Gene Richards was not able to attend. She then introduced Brigadier General Clark and Colonel Guinee. Ms. Nowak also noted that the Council had previously submitted questions for the Guard to respond to. Ms. Nowak reminded residents that the Fire Department at the Air Guard answers over 100 calls a year and are the first responders at Country Club Estates. All calls to the South Burlington Fire Department also ring at the Guard. Whenever there is a first at a structure in the City, the Air Guard responds. They were instrumental in saving John Belter’s home when there was a fire in buildings on that property. Eight city employees are also members of the Guard. Mr. Shaw then asked whether the Air Guard has communication with the Army Guard regarding their helicopters. Gen. Clark said there are no direct relations though he and their commanding officer meet weekly. He felt it would be possible to get a dialog going, possibly a noise committee. Mr. Shaw asked about the minimizing of dual flights taking off together. Gen. Clark said they do not do that. When 2 planes are sent off together, there is a 20 second space between the departures. Col. Guinee added that they used to have simultaneous take-offs, but do not do that any longer. They also use a “hush house” to minimize noise. Ms. Riehle asked if they can envision a noise committee that includes the commercial side of the airport and members of the community to arrive at some “do‐ able” solutions. Gen. Clark said the Air Force does participate with other communities. He would want to include Colchester and Burlington in such a committee. He noted that most of their Airmen are Vermonters. He also said there is a limit on what they can do to fly safely. Ms. Emery said she feels a noise abatement committee is needed. She said it works in Madison, Wisconsin. She then asked why no EIS was done when there was a change in engines. Gen. Clark said an EIS was not required. An EIS is not required for the use of the block engines. He added that the type of mission determines when they use the outer tanks (e.g., going overseas). There are different levels of review. He added that they provide the most up to date information to the Airport. He stressed that their mission is a “no fail” mission. They do everything they can to fly as quietly as they can. Ms. Emery then questioned the use of afterburners. Col. Guinee said that the exterior tanks require the use of afterburners. It is not an arbitrary decision. It is a safety decision. Ms. Emery noted that many more people now are in the “unfit to live” zone. She asked why this was not disclosed to people. These people can’t have their homes bought as people in the noise zone previously could. There is a huge difference in the noise exposure map, and she was surprised there was no requirement for an EIS. Gen. Clark said there was no noise exposure map in that timeframe. Ms. Emery asked what is the threshold for an EIS, with so many more people impacted. Col. Guinee said that is a good question. He noted that when they went to the F-16, there was an EIS, and the result was no significant impact. Ms. Emery said it was a “different regulatory world then.” Ms. Nowak noted she lives in the Airport area. She felt having a committee to discuss what can and can’t be done would be a good thing. She said she understood that the Guard now flies 226 days a year, not 365. Gen. Clark agreed with that. Ms. Nowak asked how the Air Guard worked with the city in the past. Col. Guinee said the whole process has been evolving over the years. They are always looking for ways to mitigate noise. They don’t fly low over homes until the last possible moment in order to reduce the noise “signature.” They also try to do some maneuvers at other airfields. Gen. Clark said the dialog needs to be there. Ms. Nowak said all the Council members want that dialog. Mr. Shaw noted the Guard is the largest employer in the city. He asked if there is flexibility on night flights and the F18s that come in the summer. Col. Guinee said they have to train with their partners, but there can be a “noise conversation” with them. They also try to do night flights in months when windows are closed. Gen. Clark agreed they can talk to the F-18 people about noise. Col. Guinee invited the Council to come and see a “hush house” operation. Ms. Emery asked if there are any other noise mitigations that the federal government is willing to fund, especially for ground noise. Gen. Clark said the federal government pays for some mitigation. If there is something they can do on their side of the airport, they will look into it. The public was then invited to comment. Ms. Sesani, a Winooski resident, said that even if an EIS wasn’t required, the Airport had to do a noise exposure map in 2008. The engines weren’t changed; planes from Montana flew in. If the City of Burlington didn’t do new noise exposure maps, it’s not the Air Guard’s fault. Another Winooski resident said she spoke with the EIS manager at the Pentagon in 2013, and he said there should have been an EIS when the engines were changed. She added that many recommendations were not taken up by the Airport including real estate noise disclosures, on-going noise monitoring and the installation of noise-monitoring equipment. Mr. Mahoney noted that people are concerned with noise and with the safety of planes. He noted that the MLS Board of Realtors requires people buying homes in Winooski to be told they are in the 65 db zone. He felt the same should be true in South Burlington and Williston. Ms. Sargent of the Chamberlin Neighborhood/Airport Committee noted that they are trying to make that committee work, but they have been discouraged from pursuing noise issues. She felt they can now start to make recommendations. She added that you “can’t have a pretty park with an F‐16 flying overhead.” 12. Consider and possibly approve City Hall/Public Works labor relations agreement: Mr. Dorn reviewed the history. He recognized the work of Martha Lyons, Justin Rabidoux and the Counsels who represent the bargaining groups and those who investigated pension options. Mr. Shaw then moved to approve the City Hall/Public Works labor relations agreement as presented. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 13. Consider and possibly approve CSWD lease for the drop off center at Patchen Road: Mr. Rabidoux noted the 20-year lease has expired. This is a new 20-year lease with almost identical terms. The lease is for $1.00 a year. Ms. Emery moved to approve the CSWD lease for the drop off center at Patchen Road as presented. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 14. Consider and possibly approve resolution regarding Channel 17 governance: Ms. Nowak noted this involves the combining of Essex Town and Essex Junction. Ms. Emery moved to approve the resolution regarding Channel 17 governance. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 15. Other Business: a. Items Held from Consent Agenda: There were no held items. b. Social Service Funding Allocations: Members were OK with the allocations. Members then briefly discussed what can be done on the 21st regarding the JAMGolf/LDRs. Mr. Conner said the LDRs should be addressed first. This is entirely in the city’s court. The next step would be for the applicant to continue the process. Ms. Riehle asked if both items can be taken together to assuage concerns. Mr Dorn said there is a lot more to the conservation issue, and the Council can deal with any time it chooses. Ms. Nowak reminded the Council that they usually provide a lunch for City Hall and Library employees. She suggested sometime between Christmas and the New Year. As there was no further business to come before the Council, Mr. Shaw moved to adjourn. Mr. Chittenden seconded. Motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 10:50 p.m. Published by ClerkBase ©2019 by Clerkbase. No Claim to Original Government Works. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4107 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com To: Kevin Dorn, City Manager From: Ilona Blanchard, Project Director Subject: Public Hearing and Vote on FY2017-2026 Capital Improvement Program Date: December 4, 2015 Background: The City Council will be holding a public hearing on draft FY 2017 – FY 2026 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) on December 7, 2015. This is proposed to replace the existing FY2016-2025 CIP as the City’s adopted Capital Improvement Program. This proposed CIP adds FY 2026 and incorporates changes made during the Summer/Fall 2015 budgeting process due to new information or priorities. This includes comments received from committees in the summer of 2015. The CIP reflect cost estimates and information available in the Fall of 2015. The Capital Improvement Program responds to the direction to hold the annual City budget increase to 3% and only advances projects which achieve this goal. Since the Public Hearing Draft was issued, the City has been working on the full annual budget. In order to meet the 3% guidance from Council, two replacement pages are proposed. These pages reduce the amount of proposed funding in 2017 for the City Center Reserve Fund from $860,000 to $735,000 and add the difference in proposed funding to the following year so that in FY 2018 the funding would be $985,000. A CIP summary is published as part of the annual budget book. FY 2017 costs in the amended CIP will be incorporated into the annual budget for approval in March. City’s Capital Improvement Program A Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a tool used to improve coordination in the timing of major projects, plan for capital replacement and future major maintenance costs, and reduce fluctuations in the tax rate. The attached draft CIP reflects the following potential capital expenditures: 1) Forecasted costs related to maintaining South Burlington’s current level of service through refreshing, rebuilding and replacing existing capital equipment and infrastructure including costs such as paving roadways, replacing vehicles, upgrades to existing sewer treatment plants and costly non-brick and mortar items such as cars, emergency apparatus, and IT equipment. 2) Estimated spending related to building public infrastructure that will result in a new downtown - City Center – including only projects eligible for TIF District financing such as new roadways, streetscapes and bridges, structured parking, parks, municipal facilities, wetland mitigation and stormwater management systems. 3) Projects (generally related to transportation and parks) that are included in impact fee ordinances, requested by committees or the community, or shown in long range plans or studies that improve the level of service such as reconstructing Spear Street, adding sidewalks to Hinesburg Road and expanding recreation fields. A CIP is a road map to guide budget preparation based on an estimate of future needs and costs consistent with current City priorities and fiscal outlook. The CIP incorporates Council priorities; committee recommendations which are solicited annually; adopted plans and ongoing projects; and equipment and facility maintenance, replacement and upgrade needs. As a financial planning tool, the CIP responds to the estimated fiscal capacity for each year going forward. It is not a static document and changes from year to year. Attachments: A Resolution Amending The Capital Improvement Program For Fiscal Years 2017-2026 Proposed replacement pages to bring the Capital Improvement Program in line with FY 2107 budgetary guidance. Public Hearing Draft of the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Years 2017-2025 Recommendation Listen to comments; review and consider approving the Resolution. Additional Consideration The Council is required to hold a public hearing prior to the amendment, adoption or repeal of the CIP. R – 2015 - RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2017-2026 WHEREAS, the City’s Capital Improvement Program was first adopted October 4, 1993, and amended in 1999, 2001, 2006, 2013, 2014 and 2015; and, WHEREAS, on June 18, 2012, the Council adopted a policy that requires that the City Manager prepare a capital improvement program update annually for review by the City Council; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. 4443, a properly warned hearing has been held and a copy of the proposed Fiscal Year 2017-2026 Capital Improvement Program provided to the Planning Commission and City Clerk; and, WHEREAS, the proposed Fiscal Year 2017-2026 Capital Improvement Program has been made available to the public online and in the City Clerk’s Office. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby amends the Capital Improvement Program by striking the 2015 FY 2016-2025 amendment in its entirety, and replaces it with the City’s Fiscal Year 2017-2026 Capital Improvement Program (Exhibit A) attached hereto. APPROVED this _____ day of ______________ , 2015. SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL __________________________________ ________________________________ Pat Nowak, Chair Chris Shaw, Vice Chair __________________________________ ________________________________ Helen Riehle, Clerk Meaghan Emery __________________________________ Tom Chittenden Proposed Replacement for Page 2OVERVIEW OF GENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY EXPENDITURE COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE GENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW: SUMMARY FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Costs Subtotaled: Studies, Design, Eng., Inspection, GC, Legal 1,969 2,648 3,774 2,379 1,869 2,009 2,714 400 - - 17,762 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition 35 340 676 279 168 - - - - - 1,498 Construction 4,766 17,121 17,474 14,287 9,883 8,351 20,395 3,679 684 650 97,293 Furniture & Equipment 376 1,717 3,009 2,043 1,855 2,594 707 1,343 2,083 737 16,463 Bond Payment Obligations (aggregate)817 797 775 752 729 609 590 570 550 457 6,646 Anticipated Debt Payment 208 208 208 208 208 208 149 149 149 149 1,845 Future Note Repayment - WPC 248 248 248 95 71 - - - - - 911 City Center Debt Anticipated Repayment 71 302 595 965 1,263 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 10,194 TIF District Debt Anticipated Repayment 70 908 2,030 2,542 2,888 3,364 3,364 3,364 3,364 3,364 25,258 To City Center Reserve Fund 735 985 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 8,600 To Fire/Ambulance Reserve Fund - - 25 100 - 37 856 240 - - 1,257 To Facilities Stewardship Reserve Fund 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 750 Total CIP Costs:9,371 25,349 29,750 24,585 19,870 19,507 31,109 12,079 9,164 7,691 188,477 Funding Sources Subtotaled: General Fund (sourced from Property Taxes)2,356 3,021 2,896 3,117 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 2,592 2,272 29,166 CIP Reserve Fund 71 372 487 821 1,101 1,219 1,175 1,115 1,115 1,115 8,589 Fire Reserve Fund - - - - 125 - - - 1,132 - 1,257 Facilities Stewardship Reserve Fund - - - - - - - - - - - Grant/Donation/Developer 2,445 4,351 2,944 4,388 2,774 2,921 19,835 3,400 - - 43,058 Secured Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - - Anticipated Bond Proceeds 1,347 3,291 4,259 5,331 3,893 1,787 2,596 - - - 22,504 Fire Impact Fee - 175 - - - - - - - - 175 Highway Impact Fee 765 21 25 621 279 445 - - - - 2,156 Recreation Impact Fee 63 225 717 332 294 85 - - - - 1,715 Public Facility Impact Fee - 67 109 144 162 181 225 285 285 285 1,742 Police Impact Fee 110 115 115 125 125 125 125 125 113 97 1,175 TIF District Financing - Proceeds 1,539 11,598 15,360 6,557 4,318 5,571 - - - - 44,943 Trade-In Generated Revenues 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 4 4 - 31 Other - Open Space, Rents, etc.604 1,203 804 604 680 579 559 559 559 559 6,707 TIF District Revenues (Increment)70 908 2,030 2,542 2,888 3,364 3,364 3,364 3,364 3,364 25,258 Total CIP Revenues 9,371 25,349 29,750 24,585 19,870 19,507 31,109 12,079 9,164 7,691 188,477 This page totals all General Fund capital expenditures summed by cost types and funding sources annually. Over the past few years, the City has shifted to cash payments for maintenance and replacement in lieu of debt in order to preserve debt capacity to undertake larger City priorities, i.e. the envisioned City Center. The General Fund has three reserve funds related to capital projects and equiptment and vehicle purchase: the CIP Reserve Fund, for City Center expenditures, and the Fire and Ambulance Reserves Funds, each dedicated to the purchase of Fire & Rescue vehicles. A fourth is anticipated to be added this year: Facilities Stewardship Reserve Fund. Costs below fall into three categories: project related (studies, property rights, construction, furniture & equipment), debt (payment on financing) and funding reserve funds (City Center, Fire & Ambulance, and Facilities Stewardship). NOTE that as the City Center intiative has not yet been finalized (representing $97 million in GF expenditures) and all costs are estimated, costs and time tables are tenative; and as with any program subject to change as it is based on information available today and numbers and projects will change and be refined over time. Proposed Replacement for Page 13GENERAL FUND - CITY CENTER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY EXPENDITURE COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE CITY CENTER CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW: Department Contact: SUMMARY FINANCIALS (in $1,000)Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Reserve (ten- years): Project - all years: Financing (ten-years): Estimated Costs Subtotaled: Studies, Design, Eng., Insp., GC, Legal 2,383 1,781 2,523 3,578 1,935 1,154 915 2,314 - - - 16,582 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - - - 500 100 - - - - - - 600 Construction 79 3,772 16,101 16,236 11,613 9,118 7,473 8,900 - - - 73,294 Furniture & Equipment - - 1,000 1,000 - - - - - - - 2,000 Current Bond Obligations - - City Center Bond repayment - 71 302 595 965 1,263 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 10,194 TIF District Debt Repayment - 70 908 2,030 2,542 2,888 3,364 3,364 3,364 3,364 3,364 25,258 To City Center CIP Reserve Fund 1,476 735 985 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 10,076 TOTAL PROJECT EST. COSTS (EXCLUDES FINANCING):5,553 19,624 21,315 13,648 10,273 8,388 11,214 - - - 10,076 92,477 35,452 Funding Sources Subtotaled: General Fund 1,476 735 985 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 10,076 CIP (City Center) Reserve Fund 90 71 372 487 821 1,101 1,219 1,175 1,115 1,115 1,115 227 8,452 Grants, Capital Campaigns, other 1,501 2,406 4,274 2,135 2,235 2,061 1,031 11,214 - - - 26,857 City Share of Costs Bond Proceeds - 918 3,016 3,819 4,856 3,893 1,787 - - - - 18,289 Highway Impact Fee 682 690 - - - - - - - - - 1,372 Recreation Impact Fee 93 - - - - - - - - - - 93 - Public Facility Impact Fee - - 67 109 144 162 181 225 285 285 285 1,742 TIF District Financing Proceeds 97 1,539 11,598 15,360 6,557 4,318 5,571 - - - - 45,039 Trade-In Generated Revenues Other - Open Space Funds - - 599 - - - - - - - - 599 TIF District Increment - 70 908 2,030 2,542 2,888 3,364 3,364 3,364 3,364 3,364 25,258 Total Project Funding:2,366 4,014 7,290 21,315 13,648 6,380 1,031 11,214 - - 92,477 Total Financing (Debt) Payment Funding:68 118 1,354 2,625 3,507 4,151 4,764 4,764 4,764 4,764 4,764 35,452 Total Reserve Funding:1,476 735 985 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 10,076 All City Center TIF eligible projects excluding stormwater/wetland impact mitigation which are in the Stormwater Fund. FY 17 Funding is for design of impact fee eligible projects, and design/engineering and construction for potentially Market Street, Garden Street, Dumont Park (Phase 1), and the Library. The City Hall, Library, Recreation Center and Williston Road Streetscape would be partially funded from the City Center CIP Reserve Fund, and/or Reserve Fund backed debt. Library and Recreation would have an associated capital campaign source. Grants are included for Market Street (secured) and the pedstrian bridge over I-89 (unsecured).City Manager's Office/Ilona Blanchard Public Hearing Draft Public Hearing Draft 11/20/2015 FY 2017-2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM I.GENERAL FUND 2 Overview of Totaled Expenditure Costs & Funding Sources (Revenue) summed by Type 3 Overview broken out by Department/Service Area of Expenditure Costs & Funding Sources aggregated 4 Bond (Capital) Debt (excluding Police Station located under Police)13 CIP Projects (Expenditures) Listed by Department/Service Area or Category 15 Individual Project Detail Sheets Highways/Parks 25 Fire Department 30 Ambulance 35 Police Department 38 Recreation and Parks 47 Shared Use (Recreation) Paths 51 Road and Sidewalk Improvements 61 Administration 73 City Center 78 II.SEWER FUND 89 III.STORMWATER FUND 102 A City Council Public Hearing has been warned for December 7, 6:30 PM at City Hall, 575 Dorset Street to obtain comments on this draft. A program is not a budget, but a road map to guide budget preparation based on an estimate of future projects and costs consistent with City priorities and fiscal outlook. The Capital Improvement Program is prepared yearly during the budget process but is adopted after the approval of the budget. A summary of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for FY17-26 is included in the annual budget book. A Capital Improvement Program is a tool used to improve coordination in the timing of major projects, plan for capital replacement and major maintenance costs, and reduce fluctuations in the tax rate. Public Hearing DraftI.GENERAL FUND 1 Public Hearing DraftOVERVIEW OF GENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY EXPENDITURE COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE GENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW: SUMMARY FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Costs Subtotaled: Studies, Design, Eng., Inspection, GC, Legal 1,969 2,648 3,774 2,379 1,869 2,009 2,714 400 - - 17,762 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition 35 340 676 279 168 - - - - - 1,498 Construction 4,766 17,121 17,474 14,287 9,883 8,351 20,395 3,679 684 650 97,293 Furniture & Equipment 376 1,717 3,009 2,043 1,855 2,594 707 1,343 2,083 737 16,463 Bond Payment Obligations (aggregate)817 797 775 752 729 609 590 570 550 457 6,646 Anticipated Debt Payment 208 208 208 208 208 208 149 149 149 149 1,845 Future Note Repayment - WPC 248 248 248 95 71 - - - - - 911 City Center Debt Anticipated Repayment 71 302 595 965 1,263 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 10,194 TIF District Debt Anticipated Repayment 70 908 2,030 2,542 2,888 3,364 3,364 3,364 3,364 3,364 25,258 To City Center Reserve Fund 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 8,600 To Fire/Ambulance Reserve Fund - - 25 100 - 37 856 240 - - 1,257 To Facilities Stewardship Reserve Fund 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 750 Total CIP Costs:9,496 25,224 29,750 24,585 19,870 19,507 31,109 12,079 9,164 7,691 188,477 Funding Sources Subtotaled: General Fund (sourced from Property Taxes)2,481 2,896 2,896 3,117 3,228 3,228 3,228 3,228 2,592 2,272 29,166 CIP Reserve Fund 71 372 487 821 1,101 1,219 1,175 1,115 1,115 1,115 8,589 Fire Reserve Fund - - - - 125 - - - 1,132 - 1,257 Facilities Stewardship Reserve Fund - - - - - - - - - - - Grant/Donation/Developer 2,445 4,351 2,944 4,388 2,774 2,921 19,835 3,400 - - 43,058 Secured Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - - Anticipated Bond Proceeds 1,347 3,291 4,259 5,331 3,893 1,787 2,596 - - - 22,504 Fire Impact Fee - 175 - - - - - - - - 175 Highway Impact Fee 765 21 25 621 279 445 - - - - 2,156 Recreation Impact Fee 63 225 717 332 294 85 - - - - 1,715 Public Facility Impact Fee - 67 109 144 162 181 225 285 285 285 1,742 Police Impact Fee 110 115 115 125 125 125 125 125 113 97 1,175 TIF District Financing - Proceeds 1,539 11,598 15,360 6,557 4,318 5,571 - - - - 44,943 Trade-In Generated Revenues 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 4 4 - 31 Other - Open Space, Rents, etc.604 1,203 804 604 680 579 559 559 559 559 6,707 TIF District Revenues (Increment)70 908 2,030 2,542 2,888 3,364 3,364 3,364 3,364 3,364 25,258 Total CIP Revenues 9,496 25,224 29,750 24,585 19,870 19,507 31,109 12,079 9,164 7,691 188,477 This page totals all General Fund capital expenditures summed by cost types and funding sources annually. Over the past few years, the City has shifted to cash payments for maintenance and replacement in lieu of debt in order to preserve debt capacity to undertake larger City priorities, i.e. the envisioned City Center. The General Fund has three reserve funds related to capital projects and equiptment and vehicle purchase: the CIP Reserve Fund, for City Center expenditures, and the Fire and Ambulance Reserves Funds, each dedicated to the purchase of Fire & Rescue vehicles. A fourth is anticipated to be added this year: Facilities Stewardship Reserve Fund. Costs below fall into three categories: project related (studies, property rights, construction, furniture & equipment), debt (payment on financing) and funding reserve funds (City Center, Fire & Ambulance, and Facilities Stewardship). NOTE that as the City Center intiative has not yet been finalized (representing $97 million in GF expenditures) and all costs are estimated, costs and time tables are tenative; and as with any program subject to change as it is based on information available today and numbers and projects will change and be refined over time. 2 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND DEPARTMENTAL/SERVICE AREA CAPITAL EXPENDITURES BY COSTS & FUNDING SOURCE 3 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - HIGHWAY/PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY EXPENDITURE COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE Department Contact:Justin Rabidoux SUMMARY FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Costs Subtotaled: Studies, Design, Eng., Inspection, GC, Legal 15 - 25 - - - - - - - 40 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - - - - - - - - - - - Construction 575 725 600 850 600 600 600 600 600 600 6,350 Furniture & Equipment 195 353 380 408 387 340 350 298 360 350 3,421 Bond Obligations Total CIP Costs:785 1,078 1,005 1,258 987 940 950 898 960 950 9,811 Funding Sources Subtotaled: General Fund 785 1,078 1,005 1,258 987 940 950 898 960 950 9,811 Grant/Donation/Developer - - - - - - - - - - - Secured Bond - - - - - - - - - - - Anticipated Bond - - - - - - - - - - - Highway Impact Fee - - - - - - - - - - - Trade-In Generated Revenues - - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:785 1,078 1,005 1,258 987 940 950 898 960 950 9,811 The Highway/Parks CIP includes identified maintenance needs throughout the City for general operations and maintenance such as paving, fleet replacement, a garage and salt/sand shed expansion, replacement of fuel pumps, etc. CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW: 4 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - FIRE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY EXPENDITURE COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE Department Contact:Doug Brent SUMMARY FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Costs Subtotaled: Studies, Design, Eng., Inspection, GC, Legal - - - - - - - - - - - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition 35 175 - - - - - - - - 210 Construction - - - - - - - - - - - Furniture & Equipment - 77 121 36 369 740 52 764 1,394 12 3,564 Debt Repayment - - - - - - - - - - - WPC Note Repayment 153 153 153 - - - - - - - 459 To Fire/Ambulance Reserve Fund - - 25 100 - 37 856 240 - - 1,257 Total CIP Costs:188 405 298 136 369 777 908 1,004 1,394 12 5,490 Funding Sources Subtotaled: General Fund 188 230 298 136 244 777 908 1,004 261 12 4,058 Fire Reserve Fund - - - - 125 - - - 1,132 - 1,257 Grant/Donation/Developer - - - - - - - - - - - Secured Bond - - - - - - - - - - - Anticipated Bond - - - - - - - - - - - Fire Impact Fee - 175 - - - - - - - - 175 Trade-In Generated Revenues - - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:188 405 298 136 369 777 908 1,004 1,394 12 5,490 The ten-year projection of capital expenditures for the Fire Department includes replacement costs for all rolling stock, replacement of equipment and gear, and upgrades to Station 2 which is in both the CIP and the Impact Fee Ordinance. FIRE DEPARTMENT CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW: 5 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - AMBULANCE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY EXPENDITURE COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE Department Contact:Doug Brent SUMMARY FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Costs Subtotaled: Studies, Design, Eng., Inspection, GC, Legal - - - - - - - - - - - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - - - - - - - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - - Furniture & Equipment - 32 - 35 264 55 - - - 275 386 Total CIP Costs:- 32 - 35 264 55 - - - 275 386 Funding Sources Subtotaled: General Fund - 32 - 35 264 55 - - - 275 386 Ambulance Reserve Fund - - - - - - - - - - - Grant/Donation/Developer - - - - - - - - - - - Bond_Existing - - - - - - - - - - - Bond_Future - - - - - - - - - - - Fire Impact Fee - - - - - - - - - - - Trade-In Generated Revenues - - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- 32 - 35 264 55 - - - 275 386 Vehicle, equipment replacement schedule and cost estimations for all rolling stock assigned to Emergency Medical Services Division. AMBULANCE CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW: 6 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - POLICE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY EXPENDITURE COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE Department Contact:Trevor Whipple SUMMARY FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs Subtotaled: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - - - - - - - - - - - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - - - - - - - - - - - Construction - - - - - 50 50 50 50 50 250 Furniture & Equipment 146 230 250 402 501 321 260 252 307 63 2,732 Current Bond Obligations 588 576 563 550 536 521 506 490 473 457 5,260 Total CIP Costs:735 807 814 952 1,037 891 815 791 830 570 8,242 Funding Sources Subtotaled: General Fund (sourced from Property Taxes)262 329 335 464 549 352 277 252 303 63 3,186 Grant/Donation/Developer - - - - - - - - - - - Secured Bond - - - - - - - - - - - Anticipated Bond - - - - - - - - - - - Police Impact Fee 110 115 115 125 125 125 125 125 113 97 1,175 - Trade-In Generated Revenues 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 4 4 - 31 Other - Local Option Tax/19 Gregory lease 360 360 360 360 360 410 410 410 410 410 3,850 Total Funding:735 807 814 952 1,037 891 815 791 830 570 8,242 The Police Department capital improvement program is almost entirely equipment replacement. Projections have been made to take into account the normal life cycle of the more expensive equipment utilized in police operations. Funds are designated for anticipated building repairs and improvements. POLICE CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW: 7 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - RECREATION AND PARKS DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY EXPENDITURE COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE Department Contact:Maggie Leugers I Justin Rabidoux SUMMARY FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs Subtotaled: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 96 75 40 44 - - - - - - 255 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - - - - - - - - - - - Construction 365 233 423 454 23 28 28 29 34 - 1,617 Furniture & Equipment - - - - - - - - - - - Bond Obligations - Anticipated Debt Payment 208 208 208 208 208 208 149 149 149 149 1,845 Total CIP Costs:670 516 671 706 231 236 177 178 183 149 3,717 Funding Sources Subtotaled: General Fund (sourced from Property Taxes)32 33 23 23 23 28 28 29 34 - 253 Grant/Donation/Developer - - - - - - - - - - - Secured Debt Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - - Anticipated Debt Proceeds 429 275 440 475 - - - - - - 1,619 - Recreation Impact Fee 60 60 60 60 60 60 - - - - 359 Trade-In Generated Revenues - - - - - - - - - - - Open Space Funds 149 149 149 149 149 149 149 149 149 149 1,485 Total Funding Sources 670 516 671 706 231 236 177 178 183 149 3,717 The Recreation & Parks Department is responsible for planning for future active and passive recreational needs for the community, including the purchase and development of additional land for parks, expanding and improving facilities and equipment, and working with the Bicycle/Pedestrian Committee for enhancements to the recreation path network for off road paths, on-road bicycle lanes, and sidewalks (see Recreation Paths and Roadways and Sidewalks section for planned improvements in this area). RECREATION & PARKS PROJECTS OVERVIEW: 8 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - RECREATION PATHS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY EXPENDITURE COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE Department Contact:Justin Rabidoux - Public Works SUMMARY FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 Total: Estimated Costs Subtotaled: Studies, Design, Eng., Inspection, GC, Legal Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - 165 176 179 168 - - - - - 688 Construction - - - - - - - - - - - Furniture & Equipment - - 1,218 1,149 301 1,086 - - - - 3,754 - - - - - - - - - - - Total CIP Costs:- 165 1,394 1,328 469 1,086 - - - - 4,442 Funding Sources Subtotaled: General Fund (sourced from Property Taxes)- - - - - - - - - - - - - Grant/Donation/Developer - - 759 1,056 335 1,061 - - - - 3,211 Bond_Existing - - - - - - - - - - - Bond_Future - - - - - - - - - - - Highway Impact Fee - - - - - - - - - - - Recreation Impact Fee - 165 635 272 134 25 - - - - 1,230 Trade-In Generated Revenues - - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- 165 1,394 1,328 469 1,086 - - - - 4,442 The Recreation Path projects respond to identified needs to build bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure to extend or connect existing facilities. CCRP scoping on behalf of the City in FY15 for Allen Road recreation path, Spear Street Jug Handle Recreation Path, Airport Drive/Prakway Path to Lime Kiln Road, and the Dorset Street Recreation Path between Old Cross Road and north of Autumn Hill Road. RECREATION PATHS CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW: 9 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - ROAD AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY EXPENDITURE COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE Department Contact:Justin Rabidoux - Public Works Paul Conner - Planning & Zoning SUMMARY FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Costs Subtotaled: Studies, Design, Eng., Inspection, GC, Legal 78 50 131 400 715 1,094 400 400 - - 3,268 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - - - - - - - - - - - Construction 39 48 200 1,355 142 200 10,817 3,000 - - 15,801 Furniture & Equipment - - - - - - - - - - - Current Bond Obligations Total CIP Costs:117 98 331 1,755 857 1,294 11,217 3,400 - - 19,068 Funding Sources Subtotaled: General Fund (sourced from Property Taxes)- - 33 37 - - - - - - 70 Grant_Donation_Developer Contribution 39 77 50 1,097 378 829 8,621 3,400 - - 14,490 Bond_Existing - - - - - - - - - - - Anticipated Bond - - - - - - 2,596 - - - 2,596 - Highway Impact Fee 75 21 25 621 279 445 - - - - 1,466 Recreation Impact Fee 3 - 23 - 100 - - - - - 126 - - - Trade-In Generated Revenues - - - - - - - - - - - Other - - 200 - 100 20 - - - - 320 Total Funding Sources:117 98 331 1,755 857 1,294 11,217 3,400 - - 19,068 The ROAD and SIDEWALK related CIP projects (not including City Center which are presented seperately) address identified needs to augment or reconstruct the City's roadway and sidewalk inventory. It includes short, mid- and long range projects generated by transportation studies or development plans. See also Recreation Path and City Center portions of the CIP for other roadway, bicycle and pedestrian related infrastructure. SIDEWALK AND ROADS PROJECTS OVERVIEW: 10 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY EXPENDITURE COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE Department Contact:Varies, see indiv sheets SUMMARY FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs Subtotaled: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - - - - - - - - - - - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - - - - - - - - - - - Construction 15 15 15 15 - - - - - - 60 Furniture & Equipment 35 25 41 12 33 53 45 29 22 37 332 - Anticipated Debt Repayment - WPC Note Payments 95 95 95 95 71 - - - - - 452 - - - - To Facilities Stewardship Reserve Fund 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 750 Total CIP Costs:220 135 151 122 104 53 45 29 22 37 1,594 Funding Sources Subtotaled: General Fund 125 115 131 102 108 128 120 104 97 112 1,142 Grant_Donation_Developer Contribution - - - - - - - - - - - Bond_Existing Bond_Future Trade-In Generated Revenues - - - - - - - - - - - 19 Gregory Drive Lease Payment 95 95 95 95 71 - - - - - 452 Total Funding Sources 220 210 226 197 179 128 120 104 97 112 1,594 The Administration portion of the CIP includes the fit-up of 19 Gregory, IT costs (excluding Police Station and Library costs which are serviced seperately), City-wide signage and wayfinding, and the Antennae Tower, which serves cross departmental public safety needs. CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW: 11 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - BOND OBLIGATIONS EXCLUDING POLICE STATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY EXPENDITURE COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE CIP PROJECT:Ongoing Bond Obligations Department Contact: City Manager's Office - Tom Hubbard FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction - Furniture & Equipment - Bond Obligations 229 220 211 202 193 88 84 81 77 1,386 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:229 220 211 202 193 88 84 81 77 - 1,386 Funding Sources: General Fund (sourced from Property Taxes)229 220 211 202 193 88 84 81 77 - 1,386 - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Bond_Existing - Bond_Future - - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:229 220 211 202 193 88 84 81 77 - 1,386 Includes all bond obligations for which there are no other sources of funding. This includes the Public Works Facility (2000), Emergency Communications (2003), Dorset Street Fire Station Improvements (2004), Kennedy Drive (2004), Lime Kiln Bridge Replacement (2004). It excludes the Police Station which has some funding sourced from impact fees and local option tax and is shown within the Police Department portion of the Capital Improvement Program. 12 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - CITY CENTER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY EXPENDITURE COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE CITY CENTER CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW: Department Contact: SUMMARY FINANCIALS (in $1,000)Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Reserve (ten- years): Project - all years: Financing (ten-years): Estimated Costs Subtotaled: Studies, Design, Eng., Insp., GC, Legal 2,383 1,781 2,523 3,578 1,935 1,154 915 2,314 - - - 16,582 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - - - 500 100 - - - - - - 600 Construction 79 3,772 16,101 16,236 11,613 9,118 7,473 8,900 - - - 73,294 Furniture & Equipment - - 1,000 1,000 - - - - - - - 2,000 Current Bond Obligations - - City Center Bond repayment - 71 302 595 965 1,263 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 10,194 TIF District Debt Repayment - 70 908 2,030 2,542 2,888 3,364 3,364 3,364 3,364 3,364 25,258 To City Center CIP Reserve Fund 1,476 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 10,076 TOTAL PROJECT EST. COSTS (EXCLUDES FINANCING):5,553 19,624 21,315 13,648 10,273 8,388 11,214 - - - 10,076 92,477 35,452 Funding Sources Subtotaled: General Fund 1,476 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 10,076 CIP (City Center) Reserve Fund 90 71 372 487 821 1,101 1,219 1,175 1,115 1,115 1,115 227 8,452 Grants, Capital Campaigns, other 1,501 2,406 4,274 2,135 2,235 2,061 1,031 11,214 - - - 26,857 City Share of Costs Bond Proceeds - 918 3,016 3,819 4,856 3,893 1,787 - - - - 18,289 Highway Impact Fee 682 690 - - - - - - - - - 1,372 Recreation Impact Fee 93 - - - - - - - - - - 93 - Public Facility Impact Fee - - 67 109 144 162 181 225 285 285 285 1,742 TIF District Financing Proceeds 97 1,539 11,598 15,360 6,557 4,318 5,571 - - - - 45,039 Trade-In Generated Revenues Other - Open Space Funds - - 599 - - - - - - - - 599 TIF District Increment - 70 908 2,030 2,542 2,888 3,364 3,364 3,364 3,364 3,364 25,258 Total Project Funding:2,366 4,014 7,290 21,315 13,648 6,380 1,031 11,214 - - 92,477 Total Financing (Debt) Payment Funding:68 118 1,354 2,625 3,507 4,151 4,764 4,764 4,764 4,764 4,764 35,452 Total Reserve Funding:1,476 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 860 10,076 All City Center TIF eligible projects excluding stormwater/wetland impact mitigation which are in the Stormwater Fund. FY 17 Funding is for design of impact fee eligible projects, and design/engineering and construction for potentially Market Street, Garden Street, Dumont Park (Phase 1), and the Library. The City Hall, Library, Recreation Center and Williston Road Streetscape would be partially funded from the City Center CIP Reserve Fund, and/or Reserve Fund backed debt. Library and Recreation would have an associated capital campaign source. Grants are included for Market Street (secured) and the pedstrian bridge over I-89 (unsecured).City Manager's Office/Ilona Blanchard 13 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND CIP PROJECTS BY SERVICE AREA, TYPE OR CATEGORY 14 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND HIGHWAY/PARKS OVERVIEW BY EXPENDITURE CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW:Total Estimated Revenues: Total Estimated Savings: Department Contact:Justin Rabidoux Changes from FY 16-25 CIP: SUMMARY CIP EXPENDITURES (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Paving 575 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 5,975 Fleet Replacement 195 353 380 408 387 340 350 298 360 350 3,421 Garage Expansion 15 125 - - - - - - - - 140 Fueling System Replacement - - 25 250 - - - - - - 275 TOTAL ESTIMATED CIP EXPENDITURES:785 1,078 1,005 1,258 987 940 950 898 960 950 9,811 The HIGHWAY/PARKS CIP includes identified maintenance needs to keep current levels of service throughout the City. These include general operations and highway maintenance such as paving, fleet replacement, a garage expansion, and the replacement of fuel pumps. 15 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND FIRE DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW BY EXPENDITURE CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW:Total Estimated Revenues: Total Estimated Savings: Department Contact:Doug Brent Changes from FY 16-25 CIP: SUMMARY CIP EXPENDITURES (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Equipment - 77 82 36 10 - 52 34 44 - 334 Vehicle Replacement 153 153 217 100 359 777 856 970 1,350 12 4,946 Antennae Tower 35 - - - - - - - - - 35 Fire Station 2 Fit UP - 175 - - - - - - - - 175 TOTAL ESTIMATED CIP EXPENDITURES:188 405 298 136 369 777 908 1,004 1,394 12 5,490 Updated cost estimates/pricing FIRE DEPARTMENT: Vehicle and equiptment replacement schedule and cost estimates for all rolling stock and major equiptment assigned to Fire Department and building improvements. This excludes note payments and transfers to Reserve Funds (see Fire Department Costs and Funding Summary). 16 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND AMBULANCE OVERVIEW BY EXPENDITURE CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW:Total Estimated Revenues: Total Estimated Savings: Department Contact:Doug Brent Changes from FY 16 - 25 CIP: SUMMARY CIP EXPENDITURES (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Vehicles - - - - 264 - - - - 275 539 EMS Equiptment - 32 - 35 - 55 - - - - 122 TOTAL ESTIMATED CIP EXPENDITURES:- 32 - 35 264 55 - - - 275 661 AMBULANCE: Vehicle replacement schedule and cost estimations for all rolling stock and major equiptment assigned to the Emergency Medical Services Division. 17 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND POLICE DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW BY EXPENDITURE CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW:Total Estimated Revenues: Total Estimated Savings: Department Contact:Trevor Whipple Changes from FY 16 - 25 CIP: SUMMARY CIP EXPENDITURES (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Police Station Financing Debt Service 588 576 563 550 536 521 506 490 473 457 5,260 Vehicle Replacement 80 138 184 185 141 173 188 189 144 - 1,422 Building Stewardship Fund - - - - - 50 50 50 50 50 250 Taser/Handgun Replacement - 21 4 4 10 45 10 10 10 10 122 Security and Building Access Equiptment - - - - 145 - - - - - 145 Photocopier - 9 - 8 - - 9 - - - 26 Dispatch Equipment - - - 50 50 - - - - - 100 Communications, Computers, Electronics 66 62 62 155 155 103 53 53 153 53 917 TOTAL ESTIMATED CIP EXPENDITURES:735 807 814 952 1,037 891 815 791 830 570 8,242 The bulk of the POLICE DEPARTMENT capital improvement program is payments on debt service for the police station with the remainder equipment replacement. Projections have been made to take in to account the normal life cycle of the more expensive equipment utilized in police operations. Funds are designated for anticipated building repairs and improvements. 18 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND RECREATION AND PARKS OVERVIEW BY EXPENDITURE RECREATION AND PARKS CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW:Total Estimated Revenues: Total Estimated Savings: Department Contact:Maggie Leugers | Rec & Parks Changes from FY 16 - 25 CIP: SUMMARY CIP EXPENDITURES (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Develop active/passive outdoor recreational opportunities 110 275 440 475 - - - - - - 1,300 Facilities 32 33 23 23 23 28 28 29 34 - 253 South Village Soccer Field 319 - - - - - - - - - 319 TOTAL ESTIMATED CIP EXPENDITURES:461 308 463 498 23 28 28 29 34 - 1,872 5,000 Active and outdoor Recreational opportunities has been expanded to allow for potential use of a portion of Open Space funding if approved by voters. The Recreation & Parks Department is responsible for planning for future active and passive recreational needs for the community, including the purchase and development of additional land for parks, expanding and improving facilities and equipment. 19 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND RECREATION PATHS OVERVIEW BY EXPENDITURE RECREATION PATH CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW:Total Estimated Revenues: Total Estimated Savings: Department Contact:Justin Rabidoux Changes from FY 16 - 25 CIP: SUMMARY CIP EXPENDITURES (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Kimball Avenue Shared Use Path - 165 759 396 - - - - - - 1,320 Allen Rd. Shared Use Path - - 51 185 - - - - - - 236 Spear Street Jug Handle Shared Use Path - - 26 104 - - - - - - 130 South Dorset Street Shared Use Path - - - 104 104 830 - - - - 1,038 Shelburne Road Ped/Bike Facilities - - - 58 289 231 - - - - 578 Joy Drive - Bike/Ped Facilities - - - 17 76 25 - - - - 118 Airport Drive/Parkway Shared Use Path to Lime Kiln Road - - - 186 - - - - - - 186 Vale to Spear/Swift Streets Path - - 558 - - - - - - - 558 Holiday Inn to Patchen Road; parallel to Williston Road - - - 279 - - - - - - 279 TOTAL ESTIMATED CIP EXPENDITURES:- 165 1,394 1,328 469 1,086 - - - - 4,442 none The RECREATION PATH related CIP projects address identified needs in the City's bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure. Bicycle and pedestrian related projects are also located within the Roadways and Sidewalks and City Center portions of the CIP. Recreation & Parks and Public Works work with the Bicycle/Pedestrian Committee to prioritize improvements to the recreation path network for off-road paths, on-road bicycle lanes, and sidewalks. Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission will have undertaken scoping on behalf of the City in FY15-16 for Allen Road recreation path, Spear Street Jug Handle Recreation Path, Airport Drive/Prakway Path to Lime Kiln Road, and the Dorset Street Recreation Path between Old Cross Road and north of Autumn Hill Road. 20 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND ROAD AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS OVERVIEW BY EXPENDITURE ROAD AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW:Total Estimated Revenues: Total Estimated Savings: Department Contact:Justin Rabidoux Changes from FY 16 - 25 CIP: SUMMARY CIP EXPENDITURES (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Hinesburg/Tilley Sidewalk 42 48 - - - - - - - - 89 Williston Road Network Study 75 - - - - - - - - - 75 Intersection Improvements Airport Parkway-Lime Kiln - 50 200 - - - - - - - 250 Kimball Avenue Intersection - - 25 475 - - - - - 500 Allen Rd. Sidewalks - - 33 167 142 - - - - - 342 Shelburne Rd Crosswalk Imp - - 23 93 - - - - - - 116 Connect Tilley to Community Drive - - 50 300 - - - - - - 350 Van Sicklen-Route 116 Intersection - - - 420 - - - - - - 420 Spear Street Reconstruction - - - - 315 325 2,596 - - - 3,236 Williston Road Improvements - - - - 100 369 4,221 - - - 4,690 Airport Drive Extension - - - 300 300 600 4,400 3,400 - - 9,000 - TOTAL ESTIMATED CIP EXPENDITURES:117 98 331 1,755 857 1,294 11,217 3,400 - - 19,068 The ROAD and SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS CIP projects (not including City Center which are presented seperately) address identified facility needs in the City's Roadway and Sidewalk infrastructure. It also includes many long range projects related to transportation studies. See also Recreation Path and City Center portion of the CIP for roadway, bicycle and pedestrian related infrastructure. Added Kimball Avenue Intersection 21 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND ADMINISTRATION OVERVIEW BY EXPENDITURE CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW:Total Estimated Revenues: Total Estimated Savings: Department Contact: Changes from FY 16-25 CIP: SUMMARY CIP EXPENDITURES (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Signage and Wayfinding 15 15 15 15 - - - - - - 60 IT 35 25 41 12 33 53 45 29 22 37 332 Fit-Up of 2nd Story of 19 Gregory Drive 95 95 95 95 71 - - - - - 452 Facilities Stewardship 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 750 TOTAL ESTIMATED CIP EXPENDITURES:220 210 226 197 179 128 120 104 97 112 1,594 Includes CIP expenditures related to IT, fit-up of 19 Gregory Drive, Facilities Stewardship, out year costs for signage, wayfinding. ADMINISTRATION includes capital projects related to projects undertaken for, by or within the City Manager's Office. 22 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND CITY CENTER OVERVIEW BY EXPENDITURE CITY CENTER PROJECTS OVERVIEW:Total Estimated Revenues: Total Estimated Savings: Department Contact: Ilona Blanchard Changes from FY 2016-2025 CIP: SUMMARY CIP EXPENDITURES (in $1,000)Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Market Street 1,626 2,147 3,640 1,937 - - - - - - - 9,350 Garden Street 557 261 7,298 1,236 - - - - - - - 9,351 City Center/Dumont Park 190 850 870 795 - - - - - - - 2,705 Community Recreation Center 9 - 80 1,494 6,773 6,247 3,123 - - - - 17,726 City Hall 6 - 57 759 1,423 1,208 604 - - - - 4,057 Public Library 74 2,295 6,590 5,374 - - - - - - - 14,334 Williston Road - - 219 219 2,140 1,143 175 - - - - 3,897 City Center - Parking Garage - - - 5,500 2,750 1,375 2,750 - - - - 12,375 Urban Park & Streets - - 599 3,500 263 - - - - - - 4,362 Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge over I-89 - - 270 500 300 300 1,736 11,214 - - - 14,320 PROJECT TOTAL EXPENDITURES:2,462 5,553 19,624 21,315 13,648 10,273 8,388 11,214 - - - 92,477 FY 17-26 (Future) Estimated Spending Total:90,014 Expenditures are proposed for construction in Spring of FY2017 for Market Street (only project committed for construction) and Dumont Park (Phase I) , and for design (engineering) and potentially construction in FY2017 for Garden Street. The Libary is proposed also to be underway in 2017. Funding is a mixture of reserve funds, impact fees, grants, City debt and TIF District Financing (see Grand Total for fund source breakdown). Additional environmental protection related projects are located in the Stormwater Enterprise Fund portion of the CIP. These are accounted for seperately from General Fund expenditures. This overview represents project costs only, and may not fully account for fit- up/furniture costs. Costs have been updated to reflect new cost estimates. Timing has been adjusted to reflect current information and potential opportunities. 23 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND HIGHWAY/PARKS 24 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - HIGHWAY/PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Paving DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs (Expenses): Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 575 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 5,975 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:575 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 5,975 Funding Sources (Revenue): General Fund (sourced from property taxes)575 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 5,975 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:575 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 600 5,975 STATUS: Annual maintenance DESCRIPTION: Restore and maintain City roadways through pavement resurfacing. City-wide. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Maintain city streets in a safe condition. Vehicles create wear and tear on roadway surface which can result in potholes and other hazards. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Level of funding is 156% of FY15 level.AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux 25 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - HIGHWAY/PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Fleet Replacement 0 DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction - Furniture & Equipment 195 353 380 408 387 340 350 298 360 350 3,421 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:195 353 380 408 387 340 350 298 360 350 3,421 Funding Sources: General Fund 195 353 380 408 387 340 350 298 360 350 3,421 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Road Improvement Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:195 353 380 408 387 340 350 298 360 350 3,421 STATUS: Annual Replacement Schedule DESCRIPTION: Replace highway/parks vehicles according to lifecycle expectations and costs in order to maintain the fleet in good working order. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Avoid spending more to maintain vehicles then the utility that they provide, have vehicles onhand to perform tasks required for operations. FINANCIALS COMMENT: Some vehicles have trade-in value.AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: 26 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - HIGHWAY/PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Garage Expansion DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 15 15 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 125 125 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:15 125 - - - - - - - - 140 Funding Sources: General Fund 15 125 140 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Road Improvement Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:15 125 - - - - - - - - 140 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Add bays to the Public Works garage. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: The original design for the property had two more bays, they were cut at the time of development of the Public Works garage due to financial constraints. The City's fleet size and use requires more interior storage. FINANCIALS COMMENT: AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: 27 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - HIGHWAY/PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Fueling System Replacement DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 25 25 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 250 250 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - 25 250 - - - - - - 275 Funding Sources: General Fund 25 250 275 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Road Improvement Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - 25 250 - - - - - - 275 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Replace fueling system. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: At some point the state will outlaw all underground storage tanks (USTs) and mandate above ground storage. Also, the system is aging and will require replacement eventually. FINANCIALS COMMENT: AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: 28 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND FIRE DEPARTMENT 29 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - FIRE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Vehicle Replacement n/a n/a DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction - Furniture & Equipment - 39 359 740 730 1,350 12 3,230 Current Note Repayment-Quint - Note Repayment - WPC 153 153 153 459 To Fire Reserve Fund - 25 100 37 856 240 1,257 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:153 153 217 100 359 777 856 970 1,350 12 4,946 Funding Sources: General Fund 153 153 217 100 234 777 856 970 218 12 3,689 Fire Reserve Fund 125 1,132 1,257 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Fire Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other (Future WPC Note)- TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:153 153 217 100 359 777 856 970 1,350 12 4,946 STATUS: In prior CIP, reserve funds established. DESCRIPTION: Replacement schedule and cost projections for all rolling stock including major fire apparatus (Engine/Pumpers (3), Rescue Truck/Command Post (1) and Aerial Ladder(1)) as well as trailers and other vehicles. Lifecycle factors include: maintenance costs, reliability, mileage, condition, age, and technical obsolescence. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: None - maintains current service level.JUSTIFICATION: Necessary to provide fire protection. The first to be replaced is a 2004 rescue truck. Second and Third would be the 2009 engine/pumpers. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Two trucks were purchased together and cost is spread out over 3 years. Pumper truck to be partially financed with interfund note from sewer to be paid in three equal installments of $155 + 1% interest in FY 17, 18, 19. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Fire/Doug Brent 30 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - FIRE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Equipment n/a n/a DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction - Furniture & Equipment - 77 82 36 10 - 52 34 44 334 - - - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- 77 82 36 10 - 52 34 44 - 334 Funding Sources: General Fund - 77 82 36 10 52 34 44 334 Fire Reserve Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Fire Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- 77 82 36 10 - 52 34 44 - 334 STATUS: n/a DESCRIPTION: Replacement schedule and cost projections for equipment (large expense items). OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: none JUSTIFICATION: Necessary for the daily operations of Fire Department AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Lifecycle based on several factors to include: maintenance costs, reliability, mileage, condition, age, and technical obsolescence. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Fire Department/Doug Brent 31 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - FIRE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Antennae Tower DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition 35 35 Construction - Furniture & Equipment - - Future Note TBD - Payment - - TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT & DEBT PAYMENT COSTS:35 - - - - - - - - - 35 Funding Sources: General Fund 35 35 Fire Reserve Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Fire Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - short term debt - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:35 - - - - - - - - - 35 STATUS: In design DESCRIPTION: Final cost for stand-alone tower and permitting requirements located in proximity to the CWD water tower on Dorset Street which will house our department emergency management antennae. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: The Dorset Street Water Tower is expected to no longer be available to the City for use in 2016. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: The City will pay a portion of costs, the Water District a portion of costs. This sheet represents City costs anticipated in FY 17. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Fire Department/Doug Brent 32 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - FIRE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Fire Station 2 Fit UP DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition 175 175 Construction - Furniture & Equipment - - Future Note TBD - Payment - - TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT & DEBT PAYMENT COSTS:- 175 - - - - - - - - 175 Funding Sources: General Fund - Fire Reserve Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Fire Impact Fee 175 175 Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - short term debt - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- 175 - - - - - - - - 175 STATUS: In design DESCRIPTION: Fit-up second floor to accommodate expanded staff use. Add to dorm facilities, update fire egress and other improvements to as required to facilitate full functionality. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Station 2 has more on-duty staffing then the existing facility was fitted-up for. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: The City ahs been collecting impact fees to faciltiate the fit-up.AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Fire Department/Doug Brent 33 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND AMBULANCE 34 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - AMBULANCE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Vehicles 0 DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction - Furniture & Equipment 264 275 539 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - - - 264 - - - - 275 539 Funding Sources: General Fund 264 275 539 Fire/Ambulance Reserve Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Fire Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - - - 264 - - - - 275 539 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Replacement schedule and cost projections for vehicles, mainly ambulances. Lifecycle based on several factors to include: maintenance costs, reliability, mileage, condition, age, and technical obsolescence. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Ambulances are on a 5 year replacement schedule. Ambulances are needed to be reliable, well maintained and well kept for the provision of emergency medical care to the citizens and guests of South Burlington.AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: We maintain 2 units, oldest unit gets traded when it is 10 years old. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Fire Department/Doug Brent 35 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - AMBULANCE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:EMS Equiptment 0 DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction - Furniture & Equipment 32 35 55 122 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- 32 - 35 - 55 - - - - 122 Funding Sources: General Fund 32 35 55 122 Fire Reserve Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Fire Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- 32 - 35 - 55 - - - - 122 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Equiptment to support EMS services. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Maintain service levels. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Fire Department/Doug Brent 36 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND POLICE DEPARTMENT 37 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - POLICE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Police Station - 19 Gregory Drive n/a n/a DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction - Furniture & Equipment - Bond Obligation 588 576 563 550 536 521 506 490 473 457 5,260 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:588 576 563 550 536 521 506 490 473 457 5,260 Funding Sources: General Fund (sourced from Property Taxes)118 101 88 65 51 36 21 5 - 485 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Police Impact Fee 110 115 115 125 125 125 125 125 113 97 1,175 Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - Local Option Tax 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 3,600 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:588 576 563 550 536 521 506 490 473 457 5,260 STATUS: Completed in 2010 DESCRIPTION: Bond payments on the purchase and construction of 19 Gregory Drive as the City's Police Station. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: none JUSTIFICATION: Support day-to-day Police Department operations to maintain a safe and livable City. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Impact Fee is an estimated amount and may vary from year to year resulting in concurrent variation in the General Fund source. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Police/Trevor Whipple 38 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - POLICE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Vehicle Replacement n/a n/a DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction - Furniture & Equipment 80 138 184 185 141 173 188 189 144 1,422 Bond Obligation - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:80 138 184 185 141 173 188 189 144 - 1,422 Funding Sources: General Fund (sourced from Property Taxes)77 135 180 182 138 169 185 185 140 1,391 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Police Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 4 4 31 Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:80 138 184 185 141 173 188 189 144 - 1,422 STATUS: Regular ongoing replacement function DESCRIPTION: Routine fleet replacement OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: none JUSTIFICATION: In order to keep maintenance cost reasonable and to have a safe patrol vehicle, fleet cruisers are replaced on a regular rotation (three per year). FINANCIALS COMMENT:AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Police/Trevor Whipple AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: 39 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - POLICE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Building Stewardship Fund n/a n/a DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 50 50 50 50 50 250 Furniture & Equipment - Bond Obligation - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - - - - 50 50 50 50 50 250 Funding Sources: General Fund (sourced from Property Taxes)- Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Police Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other -19 Gregory Lease Revenues 50 50 50 50 50 250 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - - - - 50 50 50 50 50 250 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Special Fund to maintain, repair and replace building systems and components as needed. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: reduce large scale building repairs, inconvenience due to system overhauls.JUSTIFICATION: Regular maintenace and timely replacement of system components reduce need for larger emergency repairs or complete system replacement. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Revenue source is part of 19 Gregory GSA lease.AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Police/Trevor Whipple 40 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - POLICE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Taser/Handgun Replacement n/a n/a DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction - Furniture & Equipment 21 4 4 10 45 10 10 10 10 122 Bond Obligation - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- 21 4 4 10 45 10 10 10 10 122 Funding Sources: General Fund (sourced from Property Taxes)- 21 4 4 10 45 10 10 10 10 122 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Police Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- 21 4 4 10 45 10 10 10 10 122 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Each officer carries a taser, handgun, holster and magazine pouch. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: none JUSTIFICATION: Tasers have a finite life cycle and require replacement, 6 are replaced annually. Best practice is to replace officer issued weapons every ten years. FINANCIALS COMMENT:AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Police/Trevor Whipple AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: 41 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - POLICE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Security and Building Access Equiptment n/a n/a DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction - Furniture & Equipment 145 145 Bond Obligation - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - - - 145 - - - - - 145 Funding Sources: General Fund (sourced from Property Taxes)145 145 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Police Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - - - 145 - - - - - 145 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Replace and/or upgrade security cameras and recording equipment in Police Station. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: none JUSTIFICATION: Security cameras allow for the protection of the police facility and police staff. Recordings of interviews, prisoner processing and interrogations are critical to criminal cases. The equipment has a life cycle of approximately 10 years.AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT:AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Police/Trevor Whipple 42 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - POLICE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Photocopier n/a n/a DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction - Furniture & Equipment 9 8 9 26 Bond Obligation - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- 9 - 8 - - 9 - - - 26 Funding Sources: General Fund (sourced from Property Taxes)- 9 - 8 9 - - - 26 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Police Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- 9 - 8 - - 9 - - - 26 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Replacement of photocopier units OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: none JUSTIFICATION: The Police Department maintains three photocopiers (Records, Dispatch and Mail room). The units require occassional replacement. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT:AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Police/Trevor Whipple 43 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - POLICE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Dispatch Equipment n/a n/a DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction - Furniture & Equipment 50 50 100 Bond Obligation - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - - 50 50 - - - - - 100 Funding Sources: General Fund (sourced from Property Taxes)50 50 100 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Police Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - - 50 50 - - - - - 100 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Replacement and upgrade of dispatch equipment. Radio consoles, audio recording equipment, and computer monitors OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: None JUSTIFICATION: Dispatch equipment has a life cycle of 10 to 15 years. Key components must be operational 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Planned replacement can reduce the risk of failure. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT:AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Police/Trevor Whipple 44 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - POLICE DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Communications, Computers, Electronics n/a n/a DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction - Furniture & Equipment 66 62 62 155 155 103 53 53 153 53 917 Bond Obligation - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:66 62 62 155 155 103 53 53 153 53 917 Funding Sources: General Fund (sourced from Property Taxes)66 62 62 155 155 103 53 53 153 53 917 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Police Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:66 62 62 155 155 103 53 53 153 53 917 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Replacement of computer servers and components (switches, routers, patch panels), radios, and mobile data terminals. Each cruiser is equiped with a in-car video, mobile data terminal for field reporting, to query databases, and for wireless call dispatch. Incremental radio replacement will insure that officers have communication with dispatchers and other officers. Includes telephone system OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: none JUSTIFICATION: Computer, radio and electronics systems need to be operational at all times. All infrastructure requires routine replacement. Industry standard is to replace servers at approximate 5 year intervals while mobile video cameras have a life cycle of approximately 10 years. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Police/Trevor Whipple 45 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND RECREATION AND PARKS 46 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - RECREATION AND PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Develop active/passive outdoor recreational opportunities 0 5,000 DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Project:Financing: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 65 75 40 44 224 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 45 200 400 431 1,076 Furniture & Equipment - Anticipated Debt Repayment 149 149 149 149 149 149 149 149 149 149 1,485 TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATED COSTS:110 275 440 475 - - - - - - 1,300 1,485 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Debt Proceeds 110 275 440 475 - 1,300 Road Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other: Open Space Fund 149 149 149 149 149 149 149 149 149 149 1,485 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING:110 275 440 475 - - - - - - 1,300 TOTAL DEBT REPAYMENT FUNDING:149 149 149 149 149 149 149 149 149 149 1,485 STATUS: Land has been purchased. DESCRIPTION: Design and construct active/passive recreational spaces that include: Open Space, multi-use field space and facilities in compliance with ADA and other regulations and population growth. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: None Fields will generate income for field maintenance.JUSTIFICATION: Active rec space and fields are maxed out resulting in an inability to rest or repair fields. 'Field stress' incurs add'l repair costs. More fields will also meet regulation requirements and population growth. City's passive recreational space has idenified needs for trail development and maintainance, invasive species removal, wayfinding signage, and fulfilling ADA and other mandates. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: This will be a large financial commitment over a few years, but the benefits will out weigh the cost. Funding would come from the anticipated Opens Space 1/2 cent, with bonds used to spread the improvements costs over ten years with 100% of the benefit realized in four years. AVG ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Recreation & Parks | Maggie Leugers 47 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - RECREATION AND PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Facilities N/A 0 DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 32 33 23 23 23 28 28 29 34 253 Furniture & Equipment - Anticipated Debt Repayment TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:32 33 23 23 23 28 28 29 34 - 253 Funding Sources: General Fund 32 33 23 23 23 28 28 29 34 253 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Road Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other: Open Space Fund - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:32 33 23 23 23 28 28 29 34 - 253 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Maintain Recreation Facilities OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: none JUSTIFICATION: Scheduled maintenance and systems replacements prolongs overall life of facilties and value to the community. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Recreation & Parks | Maggie Leugers 48 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY COSTS AND SOURCE RECREATION AND PARKS PROJECT:South Village Soccer Field N/A 0 DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 31 31 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 288 288 Furniture & Equipment - Anticipated Debt Repayment 60 60 60 60 60 60 359 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:319 - - - - - - - - - 678 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Debt Proceeds 319 319 Road Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee 60 60 60 60 60 60 359 Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other: Open Space Fund - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:379 60 60 60 60 60 - - - - 678 STATUS: land set aside. DESCRIPTION: Develop a soccer field in South Village OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: none JUSTIFICATION: Part of the South Village project. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: The City would use collected recreation impact fees that have been designated for the South Village soccer field to finance over 6 years debt to be used to build the soccer field. Total project costs are estimated at $319,000. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Recreation & Parks | Maggie Leugers 49 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND SHARED USE PATHS 50 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY COSTS AND SOURCE SHARED USE PATHS PROJECT:Kimball Avenue Shared Use Path N/A N/A DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 165 99 264 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 660 396 1,056 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- 165 759 396 - - - - - - 1,320 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution 759 396 1,155 Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee 165 165 Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- 165 759 396 - - - - - - 1,320 STATUS: Scoped. Needs final design and construction funds. DESCRIPTION: Construct a paved shared use path along Kimball Avenue to link Kennedy Dr. and the existing path along Kimball Ave to Technology Park at its westerly end, and construct the small section of path and stream crossing Muddy Brook from the easterly end of the existing path at Technology Park to the nearby Williston Town Line.OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: none - connects existing maintained pathsJUSTIFICATION: The lack of a connection places pedestrians and bicyclists on the road. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Eligible for VTrans funding. Additional options also include Rec. Impact Fees, proposing a separate bond issue for a variety of projects, or using a reserve fund as a % of the Highway Roads Annual Budget. Budget is based on current costs. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works | Justin Rabidoux 51 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY COSTS AND SOURCE SHARED USE PATHS PROJECT:Allen Rd. Shared Use Path N/A N/A DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 51 51 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 185 185 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - 51 185 - - - - - - 236 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution 185 185 Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee 51 51 Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - 51 185 - - - - - - 236 STATUS: In scoping with CCRPC DESCRIPTION: Construct shared use path along Allen Road from Spear St. to the end of the existing path near Baycrest Drive. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: none JUSTIFICATION: The lack of a connection as it presently exists places pedestrians and bicyclists on the road. This project will improve the delivery of public services and the quality of existing infrastructure. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Options include VTrans funding, Rec. Impact Fees, proposing a separate bond issue for a variety of projects, or the establishment of a reserve fund as a % of general funds spent on roadways. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works | Justin Rabidoux 52 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY COSTS AND SOURCE SHARED USE PATHS PROJECT:Spear Street Jug Handle Shared Use Path N/A N/A DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 26 26 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 104 104 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - 26 104 - - - - - - 130 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution 104 104 Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee 26 26 Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - 26 104 - - - - - - 130 STATUS: In scoping. DESCRIPTION: Construct a new paved shared use path between East Terrace and the connection to UVM path on Spear St., this would also require 2 crosswalks. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: Will be part of sidewalk maintanance operations.JUSTIFICATION: This path exists as a "people's choice" path, paving will provide an off street and designated route for pedestrians and bicyclists. Paving will improve ADA and inclement weather accessability.AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Is eligible for Vtrans funding, and CCRPC assistance with scoping study.AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works | Justin Rabidoux 53 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY COSTS AND SOURCE SHARED USE PATHS PROJECT:South Dorset Street Shared Use Path N/A N/A DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 104 104 208 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 830 830 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - - 104 104 830 - - - - 1,038 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution 104 830 934 Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee 104 104 Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - - 104 104 830 - - - - 1,038 STATUS: In scoping by CCRPC. DESCRIPTION: Construct a new paved 10 ft. shared use path along Dorset Street from existing path at Old Cross Rd. south to link with the existing path at the Hoehn Property (north of Autumn Hill Road). OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: Connects two paths that are already being maintained.JUSTIFICATION: The lack of a connection as it presently exists places pedestrians and bicyclists on the road. This project will improve the safety and comfort of alternative modes of transportation, increasing the attractiveness of these modes for risk adverse. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Eligible for funding through Vtrans and impact fees.AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works | Justin Rabidoux 54 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY COSTS AND SOURCE SHARED USE PATHS PROJECT:Shelburne Road Ped/Bike Facilities N/A N/A DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 58 58 116 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 231 231 462 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - - 58 289 231 - - - - 578 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution 231 231 462 Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee 58 58 116 Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - - 58 289 231 - - - - 578 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Widen and replace the non-ADA compliant, deteriorated sidewalk with a new paved shared use path on the east and west side of Shelburne Rd. from Imperial Dr. north to McIntosh Ave. Design & construction would run on a calendar year, falling out over two fiscal years, with bidding in the winter of 2020/21, construction summer 2021. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: none JUSTIFICATION: This project allows bicyclists and pedestrians to access and use Shelburne Road as a transportation route; facilitates access to transit from adjoining neighborhoods along Shelburne Road. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Options outlined by the committee include funding through Rec. Impact Fees for City match and as this is a state highway; state funding/grant for remainder. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works | Justin Rabidoux 55 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY COSTS AND SOURCE SHARED USE PATHS PROJECT:Joy Drive - Bike/Ped Facilities N/A N/A DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 17 6 23 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 70 25 95 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - - 17 76 25 - - - - 118 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee 17 76 25 118 Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - - 17 76 25 - - - - 118 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Construct a new paved shared use path from Joy Drive south to the existing nearby SB Recreation Path. Construct a new sidewalk along the north side of Joy Drive approaching condominiums from the end of the existing sidewalk west to link with existing sidewalk in front of Catholic Charities. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: none JUSTIFICATION: There is no sidewalk at this location. This project will improve access to active lifestyles and alternative modes of transportation including bicycling, walking and transit. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Options outlined by the committee include funding through Rec. Impact Fees, proposing a separate bond issue for a variety of projects, rec. impact fees, or the establishment of a reserve fund as a % of the Highway Roads Budget. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works | Justin Rabidoux 56 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY COSTS AND SOURCE SHARED USE PATHS PROJECT:Airport Drive/Parkway Shared Use Path to Lime Kiln Road N/A N/A DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 186 186 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - - 186 - - - - - - 186 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution 148 148 Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee 37 37 Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - - 186 - - - - - - 186 STATUS: In scoping with CCRPC. DESCRIPTION: Connect the path at Kennedy Drive to the exising path along Airport Drive around the airport and along Airport Parkway to existing path on Lime Kiln Road. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: none JUSTIFICATION: AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works | Justin Rabidoux 57 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY COSTS AND SOURCE SHARED USE PATHS PROJECT:Vale to Spear/Swift Streets Path N/A N/A DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 558 558 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - 558 - - - - - - - 558 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee 558 558 Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - 558 - - - - - - - 558 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: This path will connect Vale and Spear/Swift Streets. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: none JUSTIFICATION: AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: This path may be constructed by private property owners as they develop their properties in lieu of Recreation Impact Fees. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works | Justin Rabidoux 58 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY COSTS AND SOURCE SHARED USE PATHS PROJECT:Holiday Inn to Patchen Road; parallel to Williston Road N/A N/A DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 279 279 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - - 279 - - - - - - 279 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution 223 223 Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee 56 56 Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - - 279 - - - - - - 279 STATUS: Conceptual DESCRIPTION: Construct a path that is parallel to Williston Road. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: none JUSTIFICATION: Williston Road is a major transportation route, but lacks bicycle facilities. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works | Justin Rabidoux 59 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND ROAD AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS 60 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - ROAD AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Hinesburg/Tilley Sidewalk N/A N/A DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 3 3 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 39 48 87 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:42 48 - - - - - - - - 89 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution 39 48 87 Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee 3 3 Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:42 48 - - - - - - - - 89 STATUS: In engineering. DESCRIPTION: Extend existing sidewalk on Hinesburg Rd. in the area of Derby Circle to Tilley Drive bike path. Crossing would be on Hinesburg Rd. just north of Tilley Drive. The City is working with CCRPC to complete this project. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: Will be included in overall rec path maintenance.JUSTIFICATION: The City has two grants to complete this project and it is included in the impact fee ordinance. It is the highest priority for the Recreation Path Committee. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: The City was awarded $47,500 in the initial grant with an $11,000 local match required. The second grant is for $39,200 with a $9,800 local match. Impact fee eligible. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux 61 Public Hearing DraftPROJECT:Williston Road Network Study DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 75 75 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction - Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:75 - - - - - - - - - 75 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee 75 75 Recreation Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:75 - - - - - - - - - 75 STATUS: Traffic analysis complete. Full study required.DESCRIPTION: Study and advance towards implement access management concepts presented in 2008 US 2 Corridor Study, Cars to People Study, and ideas from 2012 Complete Streets study between Dorset Street and Hinesburg Road. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Improve circulation, capacity and place-making. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: CCRPC is undertaking a Williston Road Network Analysis FY15-16. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Planning & Zoning/Paul Conner 62 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - ROAD AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Intersection Improvements Airport Parkway-Lime Kiln DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 50 50 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 200 200 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:50 200 - - - - - 0 250 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution 29 29 Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee 21 21 Recreation Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other 200 200 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:50 200 - - - - - - 250 STATUS: 2006 Road Safety Audit Review completed DESCRIPTION: Overall intersection improvements per 2006 Road Safety Audit Review OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: traffic safety AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Included in Impact fee ordinance - may be eligible for highway safety funding.AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux 63 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - ROAD AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Kimball Avenue Intersection DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 25 15 40 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 460 460 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- 25 475 - - - - 0 500 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee - 25 475 - - - - 500 Recreation Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- 25 475 - - - - - 500 STATUS: 2006 Road Safety Audit Review completed DESCRIPTION: Intersection improvements at Community Drive/Gregory Drive OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: traffic capacity improvement AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Would need to be added to impact fee ordinance to be eligible.AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Planning & Zoning/Paul Conner 64 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - ROAD AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Allen Rd. Sidewalks N/A N/A DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 33 35 68 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 132 142 274 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - 33 167 142 - - - 0 342 Funding Sources: General Fund 33 37 70 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution 130 142 272 Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - 33 167 142 - - - - 342 STATUS: Conceptual. DESCRIPTION: Extend a sidewalk west of the existing recreation path to connect to the sidewalk in front of the Allenwood apartment complex and west to connect to Shelburne Road. Includes a brook crossing. Construction would be a single season falling across two fiscal years, with construction bid the winter prior.OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: Anticipated to be paid for from either future Bond Issue or Reserve Fund.JUSTIFICATION: The lack of a connection as it presently exists places pedestrians and bicyclists on the road. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Eligible for grant funding.AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux 65 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - ROAD AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Shelburne Rd Crosswalk Imp N/A N/A DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 23 23 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 93 93 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - 23 93 - - - - 0 116 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution 93 93 Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee 23 23 Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - 23 93 - - - - - 116 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Relocate and mark new crosswalk, and install new signalling at the intersection of Queen City Park Rd. and Shelburne Rd. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Existing crosswalk does not line up and does not provide efficient crossings for either pedestrians or bicyclists. This is the main crosswalk to access Red Rocks and the Bicycle Path from east side of Shelburne Road.AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Options outlined by the committee include funding through Rec. Impact Fees, proposing a separate bond issue for a variety of projects, or the establishment of a reserve fund as a % of the Highway Roads Budget. May be State fund eligible. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux 66 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - ROAD AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Connect Tilley to Community Drive DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 50 50 100 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 250 250 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - 50 300 - - - - - 0 350 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution 50 250 300 Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee 50 50 Recreation Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - 50 300 - - - - - - 350 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Install full roadway between Tilley Drive and Community Drive. Archeology suggests may be difficult roadway project. Alterative option is Generation Drive (private sector). OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Included in Impact Fees. Fees to be further examined upon scoping.AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Planning & Zoning/Paul Conner 67 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - ROAD AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Van Sicklen-Route 116 Intersection DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 420 420 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - - 420 - - - - 0 420 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution 334 334 Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee 86 86 Recreation Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - - 420 - - - - - 420 STATUS: No action except as associated with developmentDESCRIPTION: Establish signalized intersection at Van Sicklen / 116. May only be needed as associated with development occuring. 2007 Dorset Street Corridor study also addresses. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Traffic safety AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Included in Impact fees. Total cost used from Dorset Street study, city share from Impact Fees AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Planning & Zoning/Paul Conner 68 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - ROAD AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Spear Street Reconstruction N/A N/A DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 315 325 640 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 2,596 2,596 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - - - 315 325 2,596 - 0 3,236 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond 2,596 2,596 Roads Improvement Impact Fee 215 325 540 Recreation Impact Fee 100 100 Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - - - 315 325 2,596 - - 3,236 STATUS: Conceptual, study completed. 2004 DESCRIPTION: Reconstruct and widen Spear Street to add a shoulder on the east side of the road. This project is the complete length of the street from Route 2 to the Shelburne Town line. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: This project is outlined in the Spear Street Corridor Study and will improve the delivery of public services and access to Spear Street as a bicycle/pedestrian connection for users. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Recreation Impact fundin exists for the bicycle facility, options for the roadway include proposing a bond issue, or a reserve fund. In current $. City has the option to apply for a grant to complete the scoping study earlier. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux 69 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - ROAD AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Williston Road Improvements DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 100 369 469 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 4,221 4,221 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - - - 100 369 4,221 - - 0 4,690 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution 229 4,221 4,450 Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee 120 120 Recreation Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other 100 20 120 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - - - 100 369 4,221 - - - 4,690 STATUS: Corridor Study Completed 2008. Items completed are not included below.DESCRIPTION: Implements 2008 Rte 2 Corridor Study. Includes projects such as extending 3rd lane from SB to NB ramps, installing new/ re-timing signals, extend lane shift at Dorset Street, implement exclusive left-turn lanes, install mid-block crossings, pave shoulders east of Milham Court, add signals at key intersections.OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Improve traffic safety and congestion, pedestrian access, and place-making outside of streetscape and intersection improvements associated with City Center. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: $120 K from Airport Parking Garage expansion for Kennedy Drive/Williston Road instersection improvements. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Planning & Zoning/Paul Conner 70 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES TOTALED BY COSTS AND SOURCE ROAD AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT:Airport Drive Extension DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 TOTAL: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 300 300 400 400 400 1,800 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 200 4,000 3,000 7,200 Furniture & Equipment - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - - 300 300 600 4,400 3,400 - 0 9,000 Funding Sources: General Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution 290 236 600 4,400 3,400 8,926 Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Roads Improvement Impact Fee 10 64 74 Recreation Impact Fee - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - - 300 300 600 4,400 3,400 - - 9,000 STATUS: Scoping study completed, but out of date as a result of Airport activities; Airport is developing Master Plan. DESCRIPTION: Extend Airport Drive to Airport Parkway near Kirby Road, reducing use of the more residential White Street and south end of Airport Parkway for Airport and through-traffic. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Relieves neighborhood through traffic AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Planning & Zoning/Paul Conner 71 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND ADMINISTRATION 72 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Signage and Wayfinding n/a n/a DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 15 15 15 15 60 Furniture & Equipment - WPC Note Payment (began in FY 16)- To Facilities Stewardhip Reserve Fund TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:15 15 15 15 - - - - - - 60 Funding Sources: General Fund (sourced from Property Taxes)15 15 15 15 - - - - - - 60 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Debt Proceeds - - - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - Rent - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:15 15 15 15 - - - - - - 60 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Install building and City-owned site identification and wayfinding signs. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: none JUSTIFICATION: Enables community to identify and locate City resources. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: City Manager's Office/Paul Conner 73 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Fit-Up of 2nd Story of 19 Gregory Drive n/a n/a DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction - Furniture & Equipment - WPC Note Payment (began in FY 16)95 95 95 95 71 452 To Facilities Stewardhip Reserve Fund TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:95 95 95 95 71 - - - - - 452 Funding Sources: General Fund (sourced from Property Taxes)- - - - - - - - - - - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Debt Proceeds - - - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - Rent 95 95 95 95 71 452 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:95 95 95 95 71 - - - - - 452 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Build-out approximately 5000 square feet with a combination of municipal uses (Community Justice Center and Community Room) and a General Services Administration office lease. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: none JUSTIFICATION: Meet need for office space for community justice program needs and fulfil obligations to fit out common area and General Services Administration leased area. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: City Manager's Office/Ilona Blanchard 74 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:IT DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction - Furniture & Equipment 35 25 41 12 33 53 45 29 22 37 332 To Facilities Stewardhip Reserve Fund TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:35 25 41 12 33 53 45 29 22 37 332 Funding Sources: General Fund 35 25 41 12 33 53 45 29 22 37 332 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Debt Proceeds - - - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:35 25 41 12 33 53 45 29 22 37 332 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Replacement of printers, copiers, scanners fax machines, replacement of phone system for public works, replace existing servers as they age out, purchase computers for new employees, and replace and upgrade computers that have aged out. Includes all departments except Police Department. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Required Equipment Maintenance & Replacements, New Employees/Growth AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: City Manager's Office/Al Reed 75 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - ADMINISTRATION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Facilities Stewardship DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction - Furniture & Equipment - - To Facilities Stewardhip Reserve Fund 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 750 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 750 Funding Sources: General Fund 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 750 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Debt Proceeds - - - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 750 STATUS: Facilities Assessment completed in 2014. Contract for a "PESCO" Public Energy Service Company completed in 2015. DESCRIPTION: Ensure that all buildings owned by the City are maintained in good working condition through regular assessments, evaluations and planned maintenance. Includes the City Hall, Public Works buildings, Police Department, Fire Department, and Recreational Facilities OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: Rduce maintenance costs if planned and budgeted for as opposed to on an "emergency" basis. JUSTIFICATION: Reduces costs, preserves utility of public buildings and ensures that service provision is not inhibited by the condition of facilities. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Reserve fund does not exist and will need to be established by action of the City Council. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Tom Hubbard/City Manager's Office 76 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND CITY CENTER 77 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - CITY CENTER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Market Street DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Proj Total:Financing Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 1,626 543 331 176 2,676 - Construction 1,603 3,309 1,761 6,673 Furniture & Equipment - City Center Bond Repayment - TIF District Debt Repayment 79 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 1,611 To CIP Reserve Fund (City Center) TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:1,626 2,147 3,640 1,937 - - - - - - 9,350 1,611 Funding Sources:Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 General Fund - Reserve Fund - Federal Earmarks 1,501 1,717 2,267 5,485 - Bond Proceeds - Road Improvement Impact Fee 125 429 554 Recreation Impact Fee - Public Facilities Impact Fee - TIF District Financing 1,373 1,937 3,310 Other - TIF District Revenues 79 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 1,611 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING:1,626 2,147 3,640 1,937 - - - - - - 9,350 TOTAL DEBT REPAYMENT FUNDING:- 79 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 191 1,611 STATUS: In Permitting. 60% engineering complete. Concept Plan approved; Fed approved Environmental Assessment, engineering underway. DESCRIPTION: Reconstruct Market Street from Dorset Street to Hinesburg Road. Street will be reconstructed with a streetscape, utility infrastructure, and street furniture. If feasible, stormwater infiltration will be accomplished within the right-of-way, additional stormwater facilities will be required as well as wetland mitigation. Construction intiatiation goal of 4th quarter FY17.OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: maintenance of additional commercial roadway features.JUSTIFICATION: This street provides a parallel route to Williston Road, relieving traffic conditions during busy periods. Once reconstructed, it will support additional development and the eventual build-out of City Center (envisioned as South Burlington's downtown).AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: City has secured Federal earmarks, 1M with no match, 4.485M a local 20% match, and amounts above 6.6M 100% local. 75% impact fee funding eligible/100% TIF eligible. Prior years are estimated and summed into the total. Construction includes 10% contingency. AVG ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: City Manager's Office/Ilona Blanchard 78 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - CITY CENTER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Garden Street DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Project:Financing Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 478 261 689 112 1,540 - Construction 79 - 6,609 1,123 7,811 Furniture & Equipment - City Center Bond Repayment TIF District Debt Repayment 537 628 628 628 628 628 628 628 628 5,560 To CIP Reserve Fund (City Center) TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATED COSTS:557 261 7,298 1,236 - - - - - - 9,351 5,560 Funding Sources:Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 General Fund - Reserve Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - - Bond Proceeds - Road Improvement Impact Fee 557 261 817 Recreation Impact Fee - Public Facilities Impact Fee TIF District Financing 7,298 1,236 8,534 Other TIF District Revenues 537 628 628 628 628 628 628 628 628 5,560 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING:557 261 7,298 1,236 - - - - - - - 9,351 TOTAL DEBT REPAYMENT FUNDING:537 628 628 628 628 628 628 628 628 5,560 STATUS: A portion was built in conjunction with Trader Joe's in FY14 with City participation capped at $79,250. Remainder in engineering, alignment, typical section approved in 2015. DESCRIPTION: Design, obtain right-of-way for and construct a street between Dorset Road at the Healthy Living access drive to Midas Drive, reconstruct Midas Street as needed as a commercial support street and reconstruct the White Street/Williston Road and Hinesburg Rd/Williston Rd Intersections. Goal is construction ready in last Q of FY16.OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Garden Street will support future City Center development and, combined with Williston Rd intersection reconfiguration will implement traffic improvements as committed to for mitigation for growth of City Center in the Environmental Assessment.AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: 100% of cost is TIF eligible. It is also 75% impact fee eligible. Some or all portions may be constructed by developers. May also be eligible for grant funding, especially portions on Williston Road. Prior years are estimated and included in the total. AVG ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: City Manager's Office/Ilona Blanchard 79 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - CITY CENTER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:City Center/Dumont Park DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Project:Financing Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 190 182 163 88 - 622 - Construction 668 707 707 2,083 Furniture & Equipment - City Center Bond Repayment - TIF District Debt Repayment 70 134 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 1,741 To CIP Reserve Fund (City Center) TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:190 850 870 795 - - - - - - 2,705 1,741 Funding Sources:Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 General Fund - Reserve Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - - Bond Proceeds - Recreation Impact Fee 93 93 Public Facilities Impact Fee - TIF District Financing/Carried Costs 97 850 870 795 - - 2,612 Other - TIF District Increment 70 134 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 1,741 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING:190 850 870 795 - - - - - - - 2,705 TOTAL DEBT REPAYMENT FUNDING:70 134 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 192 1,741 STATUS: Design and Engineering contract awarded and design underway. Included in the TIF District Application; Dumont property purchased 1975. If addl property purchased, will increase cost. DESCRIPTION: Create a City Center park with entries, permeable and hardscape trails through the Dumont Park Property and Tributary 3 vicinity serving City Center. Protect wetlands and provide bridge crossings. Add landscaping and furniture to enhance and protect natural area and make park inviting and publically accessible. Phase 1: Dumont parcel, Phase 2: Trib 3 Boardwalk, Phase 3: San Remo OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: Would be added to the regular park maintenance schedule; not significant enough to require add'l personel. JUSTIFICATION: Improves the economic vitality and cultural, social, and aesthetic quality of life. Accessible green areas are important to health. Improves Potash Brook. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: 95% TIF Financing eligible. Impact Fee eligible. Tributary 3 is privately owned - costs attributed to this area's improvements may relate to a private development project. Prior Years are estimated and included in the total. Phase 1 Summer 2016 or 2017, Phase 2 - 2019, Phase 3 - 2019 AVG ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: CM/Ilona Blanchard 80 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - CITY CENTER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Public Library 56287 DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Project:Financing Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 74 795 614 398 1,881 - Construction 1,500 4,976 3,976 10,453 Furniture & Equipment 1,000 1,000 2,000 City Center Bond Payment 71 294 478 478 478 478 478 478 478 478 4,191 TIF District Debt Payment 129 232 232 232 232 232 232 232 232 1,981 To City Center Reserve Fund TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATED COSTS:74 2,295 6,590 5,374 - - - - - - 14,334 6,172 Funding Sources:Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 General Fund - City Center Reserve Fund 74 71 227 370 370 370 370 370 370 370 370 74 3,256 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution 689 2,007 1,642 - 4,338 Current Bond - Anticipated City Share Bond - 918 2,906 2,397 6,222 Road Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee - Public Facility Impact Fee - 67 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 109 935 TIF District Financing Debt 689 1,677 1,335 3,700 Other - TIF District Increment 129 232 232 232 232 232 232 232 232 1,981 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING:74 918 4,583 3,732 - - - - - - 14,334 TOTAL DEBT REPAYMENT FUNDING:759 423 710 710 710 710 710 710 710 710 6,172 STATUS: Program Study and Task Force recommendation with PC Construction estimate completed and sent to Council in 2013. DESCRIPTION: Provide a downtown Public Library as an integral part of the community by providing informational resources for educational and recreational needs of the community in an atmosphere that is welcoming and accessible to all, where communication of ideas, enlightenment of its citizens and personal enrichment can occur. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: New staff TBD JUSTIFICATION: Will serve as an attractor/anchor in City Center. The existing facility located in the High School has outgrown the combined model and a separate Library will allow both entities to meet the growing needs of the City and to pursue their separate missions.AVG EST SAVINGS PER YEAR (1000s): FINANCIALS COMMENT: 30% TIF District Financing eligible. Growth related costs may be impact fee eligible. Project would be funded through public bonds, a capital campaign including potential grants, and other sources as available. Prior Years is estimated and included in the total. Includes estimate for fixtures and furnishings. AVG ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Library Director/Jennifer Murray 81 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - CITY CENTER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Community Recreation Center N/A N/A DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Project:Financing Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 9 80 994 994 568 284 2,928 500 100 600 Construction 5,679 5,679 2,839 14,197 Furniture & Equipment City Center Bond Payment 42 235 413 502 502 502 502 502 3198.77162 TIF District Debt Payment 34 202 356 433 433 433 433 433 2,755 To City Center Reserve Fund TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:9 80 1,494 6,773 6,247 3,123 - - - - 17,726 5,954 Funding Sources:Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 General Fund City Center Reserve Fund 9 80 42 235 413 492 448 388 388 388 89 2,794 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution 493 2,235 2,061 1,031 5,820 Current Bond Anticipated City Share Bond 553 2,506 2,311 1,156 - - - - 6,526 Road Improvement Impact Fee Recreation Impact Fee Public Facility Impact Fee - - - 10 53 114 114 114 404 TIF District Financing Debt 448 2,032 1,874 937 5,291 Other TIF District Increment Revenues 34 202 356 433 433 433 433 433 2,755 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING:9 80 1,494 6,773 6,247 3,123 17,726 TOTAL DEBT REPAYMENT FUNDING:77 437 768 934 934 934 934 934 5,954 STATUS: STATUS: Program Study and Task Force recommendation with PC Construction estimate completed and sent to Council in 2013. DESCRIPTION: This center will provide an indoor multi-generational recreation facility for the community and surrounding area. The center will feature an indoor gymnasium, food prep, multi-purpose activity space, class and meeting rooms, locker rooms, storage, offices and separate program areas for preschool, teens, and senior citizens, and performance space. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: Recovery of all costs is estimated in study at 80%, current is 0% administration, 100% programs. JUSTIFICATION: There is currently limited quality public space available for many residents in particular demographics. Schools are not able to provide facility space during the day; with after school and evening school activities, general public utilization of these spaces is minimal.AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Local funding will be provided through a reserve funded by property taxes. This would be mainly used for feasibility, design, engineering, and permitting and servicing financing costs. TIF Eligiblity for financing is 30% of costs. Prior Years is is estimated and included in the total. Opportunity for Impact Fee. AVG ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Recreation & Parks-Maggie Leugars 82 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - CITY CENTER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:City Hall DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Project:Financing: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 6 57 259 173 58 29 581 - Construction 500 1,250 1,150 575 3,475 Furniture & Equipment - City Center Bond Payment 58 156.80 234.46 276.24 276.24 276.24 276.24 276 1,831 TIF District Debt Payment 11 26.11 30.75 30.75 30.75 30.75 31 191 To City Center Reserve Fund TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATED COSTS:6 57 759 1,423 1,208 604 - - - - 4,057 2,022 Funding Sources:Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 25 FY 26 General Fund - City Center Reserve Fund 6 57 58 121 181 214 214 214 214 214 63 1,429 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated City Share Bond 759 1,280 1,010 543 3,593 Road Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee - Public Facility Impact Fee 36 53 63 63 63 63 63 402 TIF District Financing Debt 142 197 60 400 Other - TIF District Increment 11 26 31 31 31 31 31 191 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING:6 - 57 759 1,423 1,208 604 4,057 TOTAL DEBT REPAYMENT FUNDING:58 168 261 307 307 307 307 307 2,022 STATUS: Program Study and Task Force recommendation with PC Construction estimate completed and sent to Council in 2013.DESCRIPTION: Construct a downtown City Hall which includes City functions related to the City Manager's Office, City Clerk, Planning and Zoning, and the Tax Assessor's Office. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: TBD JUSTIFICATION: Will serve the City for the next forty years and serve as an attractor/anchor in City Center. It will bring the Civic culture of South Burlington to the new downtown. Some City Hall functions are scheduled to outgrow or have outgrown existing facilities. AVG EST SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: This facility is eligible for 10% TIF District financing. This could be eligible for Impact Fees, but no impact fees exist at this moment. Prior Years are estimated and included in the total. AVG EST REVENUES PER YEAR: City Manager's Office/Ilona Blanchard 83 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - CITY CENTER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Williston Road DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Project:Financing: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 219 219 195 104 16 753 - Construction 1,945 1,040 159 3,144 Furniture & Equipment - City Center Bond Payment 8 16 95 137 143 143 143 143 143 973 TIF District Debt Payment - 8 16 95 137 143 143 143 143 143 973 To City Center Reserve Fund TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATED COSTS:- - 219 219 2,140 1,143 175 - - - - 3,897 1,946 Funding Sources:Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 General Fund - City Center Reserve Fund 8 16 95 137 143 143 143 143 143 - 973 Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated City Share Bond 110 110 1,070 572 87 1,949 Road Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee - Public Facility Impact Fee TIF District Financing Debt 110 110 1,070 572 87 1,949 Other TIF District Increment 8 16 95 137 143 143 143 143 143 973 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING:- - 219 219 2,140 1,143 175 - - - - 3,897 TOTAL DEBT REPAYMENT FUNDING:- 16 32 190 274 287 287 287 287 287 1,946 STATUS: Cars to People Study was completed in 2011. Williston Road Network study is underway. Part of TIF District Adopted Plan. DESCRIPTION: Build streetscape on Williston Road from Dorset Street to Hinesburg Road, north and south side to reduce pedestrian/bicycle vehicular conflicts, reduce the number of access points, and make alternative mode facilities more comfortable and safe. In the future, this roadway will serve as a gateway to City Center.OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: TBD/N/A JUSTIFICATION: A major East-West connector, Williston Rd faces increasing traffic pressure, acts as a ped/bike barrier, and is a high crash area. Access management, and pedestrian/bicycle facility improvements will increase capacity, comfort, safety, mobility, and transit accessability. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Eligible for 50% TIF District Financing. Could be more eligible for impact fees if ordinance is updated. May be a transportation grant candidate. AVG ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: City Manager's Office/Ilona Blanchard 84 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - CITY CENTER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Urban Park & Streets DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Project:Financing: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 99 331 24 455 - Construction 500 3,169 239 3,908 Furniture & Equipment - City Center Bond Payment - TIF District Debt Payment 272 293 293 293 293 293 293 293 2,320 To City Center Reserve Fund TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATED COSTS:- 599 3,500 263 - - - - - 4,362 2,320 Funding Sources:Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 General Fund - City Center Reserve Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Road Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee - Public Facility Impact Fee - TIF District Financing Debt 3,500 263 3,763 Open Space Fund 599 599 TIF District Increment 272 293 293 293 293 293 293 293 2,320 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING:- 599 3,500 263 - - - - - - 4,362 TOTAL DEBT REPAYMENT FUNDING:- 272 293 293 293 293 293 293 293 2,320 STATUS: Part of the Adopted TIF District Plan. DESCRIPTION: Install a Urban Park surrounded by Festival Streets on two sides of the Urban Park that may be closed for events. Will include walkways, pedestrian oriented lighting, landscaping, and possibly an open air structure such as for markets. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: TBD JUSTIFICATION: Provides placemaking that will attract commercial business investors to City Center such as retail, restaurant, and commercial services that benefit from a downtown location. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: This project is 100% TIF District financing eligible. The roadway portion of this is also 75% impact fee eligible, and the park portion could also be impact fee elible. May be built as a developer contribution. AVG ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: City Manger's Office/Ilona Blanchard 85 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - CITY CENTER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:City Center - Parking Garage DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Project:Financing: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 500 250 125 250 1,125 - Construction 5,000 2,500 1,250 2,500 11,250 Furniture & Equipment - City Center Bond Payment - TIF District Debt Payment 403 613 722 951 951 951 951 951 6,490 To City Center Reserve Fund - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - 5,500 2,750 1,375 2,750 - - - - 12,375 6,490 Funding Sources:Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 General Fund - City Center Reserve Fund - Grant/Donation/Developer Contribution - Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Road Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee - Public Facility Impact Fee - TIF District Financing Debt 5,500 2,750 1,375 2,750 12,375 BAN - TIF District Increment 403 613 722 951 951 951 951 951 6,490 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING:- - 5,500 2,750 1,375 2,750 - - - - 12,375 TOTAL DEBT REPAYMENT FUNDING:403 613 722 951 951 951 951 951 6,490 STATUS: Conceptual; In adopted TIF District Plan. No specific need identified as of yet. DESCRIPTION: Build public parking to serve public parking needs in City Center. Public parking may be built as a publically owned condominium within a private project. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: Any parking generated revenue should go to Trans Demand District management/ garage maintenance & operation JUSTIFICATION: Smaller properties would not redevelop without public and/or offsite parking. Inefficient use of land will result in a development pattern lacking a street wall to define streets or "living room" effect along sidewalks without shared structured public parking.AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: 100% TIF approved for 450 parking spaces (2015). This predicts development of 200 spaces in FY 19, 100 in FY20, 50 in FY21, and 100 in FY22. Assumes parking will be part of larger project (library, mixed use commercial,etc.). AVG ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: City Manager's Office/Ilona Blanchard 86 Public Hearing DraftGENERAL FUND - CITY CENTER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE PROJECT:Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge over I-89 DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Project:Financing: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 270 500 300 300 336 2,314 4,020 - Construction 1,400 8,900 10,300 Furniture & Equipment - City Center Bond Payment - TIF District Debt Payment 21 61 86 112 271 271 271 271 271 1,635 To City Center Reserve Fund - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - 270 500 300 300 1,736 11,214 - - 14,320 1,635 Funding Sources:Prior Years FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 General Fund - City Center Reserve Fund - Anticipated Federal/Regional Participation 11,214 11,214 Current Bond - Anticipated Bond - Road Improvement Impact Fee - Recreation Impact Fee - Public Facility Impact Fee - TIF District Financing Debt 270 500 300 300 1,736 3,106 Other - TIF District Increment 21 61 86 112 271 271 271 271 271 1,635 TOTAL PROJECT FUNDING:- 270 500 300 300 1,736 11,214 - - 14,320 TOTAL DEBT REPAYMENT FUNDING:21 61 86 112 271 271 271 271 271 1,635 STATUS: In adopted Official Map; adopted TIF Plan. Anticipated to be submitted in the UPWP to CCRPC for scoping FY16. DESCRIPTION: Design and build a pedestrian/bicycle bridge over I-89 in the vicinity of Williston Road so that these alternative modes are not crossing four accesses to I-89. Connect City Center to UVM/The University of Vermont Medical Center. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: TBD JUSTIFICATION: Increases alternative mode (bicycle, walking, scooter, skateboard) capacity on Williston Road for risk-adverse users by eliminating on and off ramp crossings. Makes alternative transportation more comfortable and safe (attractive to users).AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Project is 30% TIF eligible. The remainder is expected to come from Federal Grants as the project serves the region. Eligible for CCRPC funded scoping study; if this occurs in FY 17, any required matching funds may be accrued to FY 18. AVG ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: City Manager's Office/Ilona Blanchard 87 Public Hearing DraftII.SEWER 88 Public Hearing DraftSEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES AGGREGATED BY COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW: Department Contact: SUMMARY FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Costs Subtotaled: Current Bond Payments 1,517 1,517 1,517 1,517 1,272 1,272 1,272 1,272 1,272 1,272 13,701 Studies, Design, Eng., Inspection, GC, Legal 90 125 150 - 200 200 - - - - 765 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition 25 25 - - - - - - - - 50 Construction 50 2,220 2,730 1,825 1,675 - 5,000 10,000 - - 23,500 Furniture & Equipment 20 160 65 - - 70 135 80 - 75 605 - 245 245 245 245 245 245 245 - - 1,713 Total CIP Costs:1,702 4,047 4,462 3,342 3,147 1,542 6,407 11,352 1,272 1,347 40,334 Funding Sources Subtotaled: Colchester portion of Airport Parkway Bond 742 742 742 742 742 742 742 742 742 742 7,423 State Revolving Loan Fund 160 4,075 650 1,825 1,675 - 2,000 10,000 - - 20,385 Sewer Fund (Raised by Fees)800 1,205 1,585 1,020 975 1,045 3,910 855 530 605 12,526 Total Funding Sources:1,702 6,022 2,977 3,587 3,392 1,787 6,652 11,597 1,272 1,347 40,334 Sewer Capital Expenditures are replacement and maintenance based to keep levels of service consistant, improve the quality of service or reduce maintenance costs from year to year. Capital Expenditures related to Barlett Bay upgrades may include a capacity expansion to meet future demand increases. Justin Rabidoux | Public Works 89 Public Hearing DraftSEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE (BY PROJECT) CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW: Department Contact:Justin Rabidoux Changes from FY 16 SUMMARY CIP EXPENDITURES (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Fleet Replacement - 160 65 - - 70 135 80 - 75 585 Airport Parkeway Outfall - 220 230 - - - - - - - 450 Bartlett Bay Updgrades - - - - 200 200 5,000 10,000 - - 15,400 Sewer Pump Station SCADA Replacement 70 - - - - - - - - - 70 Hinesburg Rd. PS and Dorset St. FM - 100 150 1,675 1,675 - - - - - 3,600 Hadley Road Pump Stations - 25 - - - - - - - - 25 Lane Press Pump Station & Force Main 25 1,500 - - - - - - - - 1,525 BBWWTF Phosphorous Limits Study 25 25 500 - - - - - - - 550 Inflow & Infiltration Reduction - - - 150 - - - - - - 150 Gravity Sleeves 65 500 500 - - - - - - - 1,065 TOTAL ESTIMATED CIP EXPENDITURES:185 2,530 1,445 1,825 1,875 270 5,135 10,080 - 75 23,420 Sewer Capital Expenditures are replacement and maintenance based to keep levels of service consistant, improve service quality or reduce maintenance costs from year to year. Capital Expenditures related to Barlett Bay upgrades may include a capacity expansion to meet future demand increases. None 90 Public Hearing DraftSEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE (BY COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE) PROJECT:Fleet Replacement 0 DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction - Furniture & Equipment 160 65 70 135 80 75 585 Revolving Loan Repayment TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- 160 65 - - 70 135 80 - 75 585 Funding Sources: Other - Sewer Fund 160 65 70 135 80 75 585 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- 160 65 - - 70 135 80 - 75 585 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Replace sewer fleet. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Maintain equiptment in safe and working order. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux 91 Public Hearing DraftSEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE (BY COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE) PROJECT:Airport Parkeway Outfall DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 220 230 450 Furniture & Equipment - Revolving Loan Repayment TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- 220 230 - - - - - - - 450 Funding Sources: State Revolving Fund 450 450 Sewer Fund - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- 450 - - - - - - - - 450 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Repairs to the Airport Parkway Outfall line; it has suffered two major leaks in the past few years. Preliminary Engineering alternatives should compare an alternatives to replace the outfall with a conventional gravity sewer outfall with alternatives that include a micro-hydro turbine to generate electrical power.OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: If this line suffered a major failure, it would impair the Winooski River, put the City at risk of state/federal fines and severely impact AP's ability to operate. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: Will use other funding sources as available like CWSRF loan fund. Efficiency Vermont Grant funding may be available if the selected outfall replacement alternative includes a micro-hydro turbine to generate electrical power. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux 92 Public Hearing DraftSEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE (BY COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE) PROJECT:Bartlett Bay Updgrades DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 200 200 400 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 5,000 10,000 15,000 Furniture & Equipment - Revolving Loan Repayment TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - - - 200 200 5,000 10,000 - - 15,400 Funding Sources: Other (Revolving Loan Fund)2,000 10,000 12,000 Sewer Fund 200 200 3,000 3,400 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - - - 200 200 5,000 10,000 - - 15,400 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Major ugrades to Bartlett Bay WW Plant and capacity expansion (as needed) OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Every ~20 years investments are needed to sewer plants AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: will use other funding sources as available AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux 93 Public Hearing DraftSEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE (BY COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE) PROJECT:Sewer Pump Station SCADA Replacement DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 50 50 Furniture & Equipment 20 20 Revolving Loan Repayment TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:70 - - - - - - - - - 70 Funding Sources: Other (State Revolving Loan Fund)70 70 Sewer Fund - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:70 - - - - - - - - - 70 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Upgrade the SCADA software and communication equipment between the sewer plants and our 30 pump stations. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Presently alarms go off but may not be communicated back to the plant and staff. Failure to respond to alarms puts the equipment and enviornment in jeopardy. Exsiting radios are obsolete.AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: will use other funding sources as available AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux 94 Public Hearing DraftSEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE (BY COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE) PROJECT:Hinesburg Rd. PS and Dorset St. FM DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 100 150 250 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 1,675 1,675 3,350 Furniture & Equipment - Revolving Loan Repayment TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- 100 150 1,675 1,675 - - - - - 3,600 Funding Sources: Other (State Revolving Fund)100 150 1,675 1,675 3,600 Sewer Fund - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- 100 150 1,675 1,675 - - - - - 3,600 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Refurbishment and upgrade of the Hinesburg Road Pump Station and Dorset St. Force Main to replace worn and capacity strained infrastructure. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: The Hinesburg Road pump station and Dorset Street force main need repairs for both capacity and realiabity reasons. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: will use other funding sources as available.AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux 95 Public Hearing DraftSEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE (BY COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE) PROJECT:Hadley Road Pump Stations DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition 25 25 Construction 1,500 1,500 Furniture & Equipment - Revolving Loan Repayment 245 245 245 245 245 245 245 1,713 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- 25 - - - - - 3,238 Funding Sources: Other (State Revolving Fund)1,525 1,525 Sewer Fund 245 245 245 245 245 245 245 1,713 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- 1,770 245 245 245 245 245 245 - - 3,238 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Construction of a new pump station and force main and upgrade of the existing Correctional Center Pump Station and force main to facilitate redirecting of sewage flow from the City of Burlington Main WWTF to the Bartlett Bay WWTF in order to reduce operating expenses.OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: Elimination of approximate $200k annual operating expenses paid to City of Burlington. JUSTIFICATION: Approximate 7 year project payback. This project will upgrade the Correctional Center Pump Station and Force Main which is old, worn and capacity strained. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: will use other funding sources like the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) as available. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux 96 Public Hearing DraftSEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE (BY COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE) PROJECT:Lane Press Pump Station & Force Main DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition 25 25 Construction 1,500 1,500 Furniture & Equipment - Revolving Loan Repayment TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:25 1,500 - - - - - 1,525 Funding Sources: Other (State Revolving Fund)25 1,500 1,525 Sewer Fund - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:25 1,500 - - - - - - - - 1,525 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: The Lane Press Pump Station and Force Main has strained capacity. The Lane Press Pump Station and Force Main capacity will be increased to meet anticipated sewage flows. An alternative to replace this existing pump station and force main with a new gravity sewer will be investigated in order to reduce future operating costs.OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: This project will upgrade the Lane Press Pump Station and Force Main which has strained capacity. The upgrade is needed in order to handle anticipated sewage flows.AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: will use other funding sources like the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) as available. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux 97 Public Hearing DraftSEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE (BY COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE) PROJECT:BBWWTF Phosphorous Limits Study DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 25 25 50 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 500 500 Furniture & Equipment - Revolving Loan Repayment TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:25 25 500 - - - - - - - 550 Funding Sources: Other (State Revolving Fund)- Sewer Fund 25 25 500 550 TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:25 25 500 - - - - - - - 550 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: This project will complete a feasibility study to determine the feasibility and costs associated with complying with stricter limits for phosphorous treatment. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: The next NPDES permit renewal may include stricter limits for phosphorous treatment. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: will use other funding sources like the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) as available. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux 98 Public Hearing DraftSEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE (BY COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE) PROJECT:Inflow & Infiltration Reduction DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 150 150 Furniture & Equipment - Revolving Loan Repayment TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:- - - 150 - - - - - 150 Funding Sources: Other (State Revolving Fund)150 150 Sewer Fund - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:- - - 150 - - - - - - 150 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: This project will investigate, locate and reduce sources of precipitation induced inflow and groundwater induced infiltration (leaks) into the sanitary sewer system. Inflow and Infiltration, aka. I&I. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Excessive I&I reduces the available wastewater infrastructure capacity and increases operational costs. Locating and reducing inflow and infiltration frees up available wastewater infrastructure capacity to treat wastewater.AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: will use other funding sources like the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) as available. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux 99 Public Hearing DraftSEWER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE (BY COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE) PROJECT:Gravity Sleeves DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 65 65 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 500 500 1,000 Furniture & Equipment - Revolving Loan Repayment TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:65 500 500 - - - - - 1,065 Funding Sources: Other (State Revolving Fund)65 500 500 1,065 Sewer Fund - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:65 500 500 - - - - - - - 1,065 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: This project will investigate the feasibility of installing gravity sewer sleeves at three Potash Brook culvert replacement locations to facilitate future construction of gravity sewer to replace up to 6 existing sanitary sewer pump stations and force mains. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Replacement of existing sanitary sewage pump stations and force mains with new gravity sewer is anticipated to reduce future capital, operations and maintenance costs.AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: will use other funding sources like the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) as available. AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux 100 Public Hearing DraftIII.STORMWATER 101 Public Hearing DraftSTORMWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURES AGGREGATED BY COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW:Department Contact: SUMMARY FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 Total: Costs Subtotaled: Current Note - Studies, Design, Eng., Inspection, GC, Legal 100 - - - - - - - - - 100 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - - - - - - - - - - - Construction 1,750 3,559 737 833 941 1,063 1,213 1,382 1,576 2,047 15,101 Furniture & Equipment 10 160 - - 56 4 306 254 - - 789 To Reserve Fund 200 200 110 110 110 110 110 254 - - 1,204 Total Storm Water CIP Costs:2,060 3,919 847 943 1,107 1,177 1,629 1,890 1,576 2,047 17,194 Funding Sources Subtotaled: Reserve Fund 59 160 - - 56 4 366 254 - - 898 Grant_Donation_Developer Contribution 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 449 TIF District Financing - 2,900 - - - - - - - - 2,900 Trade-In Generated Revenues - - - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - - Stormwater Fund (Raised by Stormwater Fees)1,956 814 802 898 1,006 1,128 1,218 1,591 1,531 2,002 12,947 Total Identified Stormwater Funding Sources:2,060 3,919 847 943 1,107 1,177 1,629 1,890 1,576 2,047 17,194 The Stormwater CIP includes upgrades to the Stormwater management capacity of the City, specialized fleet vehicles used in maintenance operations, and City Center environmental projects (stormwater facilities and wetland mitigation). Funding is a mix of Stormwater Fund (raised by fees), reserve funds, grants and special assessments, and projected TIF District Financing. Justin Rabidoux 102 Public Hearing DraftSTORMWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE (BY PROJECT) CIP PROJECTS OVERVIEW: Department Contact:Justin Rabidoux Changes from FY 16 CIP: SUMMARY CIP EXPENDITURES (in $1,000)FY 16 FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 Total: Fleet Replacement *10 160 - - 56 4 306 254 - - 789 City Center - Environmental Improvements 550 2,900 - - - - - - - - 3,450 Stormwater Projects 1,300 659 737 833 941 1,063 1,213 1,382 1,576 2,047 11,751 - TOTAL ESTIMATED CIP EXPENDITURES:1,860 3,719 737 833 997 1,067 1,519 1,636 1,576 2,047 15,990 *Excludes transfers to the Fleet Reserve Fund. The Stormwater CIP includes upgrades to the Stormwater management capacity of the City, specialized fleet vehicles used in maintenance operations, and City Center environmental projects (stormwater facilities and wetland mitigation). Funding is a mix of Stormwater Fund (raised by fees), reserve funds, grants and special assessments, and projected TIF District Financing. None 103 Public Hearing DraftSTORMWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE (BY COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE) PROJECT:Fleet Replacement 0 DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction - Furniture & Equipment 10 160 56 4 306 254 789 To Fleet Reserve Fund 200 200 110 110 110 110 110 254 1,204 TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:210 360 110 110 166 114 416 508 - 1,993 Funding Sources: Fleet Reserve Fund 59 160 56 4 366 254 898 Raised by Fees 151 200 110 110 110 110 50 254 1,095 Grant_Donation_Developer Contribution - TIF District Financing - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:210 360 110 110 166 114 416 508 - 1,993 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Replace Stormwater fleet - pumper truck, vactor, sweepers etc. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Maintain equiptment in safe and working order. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux 104 Public Hearing DraftSTORMWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE (BY COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE) PROJECT:City Center - Environmental Improvements DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal 100 100 Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 450 2,900 3,350 Furniture & Equipment - - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:550 2,900 - - - - - - - 3,450 Funding Sources: Reserve Fund - Stormwater Fund 550 550 Grant_Donation_Developer Contribution - TIF District Financing 2,900 2,900 Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:550 2,900 - - - - - - - 3,450 STATUS: Some offsite wetland imrovements designed, others conceptualized in the Market Street Environmental Assessment. Additional design concept work may occur with Market Street. DESCRIPTION: Design, engineer and construct stormwater, stream restoration and wetland mitigation improvements related to City Center. Stormwater treatment and other environmental mitigation features will be incorporated into the natural parkscape where feasible.OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Environmental improvements related to the construction of City Center have been committed to by the Environmental Assessment. These are more efficient if constructed by as a whole than piecemeal.AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: City has applied for Tax Increment Financing for 90% of funds. The costs to cover the estimated public portion of the project have already been built into the prior year CIP. AVG ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: City Manager's Office/Ilona Blanchard 105 Public Hearing DraftSTORMWATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXPENDITURE (BY COSTS AND FUNDING SOURCE) PROJECT:Stormwater Projects 0 DEPARTMENT/STAFF CONTACT: FINANCIALS (in $1,000)FY 17 FY 18 FY 19 FY 20 FY 21 FY 22 FY 23 FY 24 FY 25 FY 26 Total: Estimated Costs: Studies, Design, Engineering, Inspection, GC, Legal - Land/ROW/Easement Acquisition - Construction 1,300 659 737 833 941 1,063 1,213 1,382 1,576 2,047 11,751 Furniture & Equipment - To Fleet Reserve Fund - TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS:1,300 659 737 833 941 1,063 1,213 1,382 1,576 2,047 11,751 Funding Sources: Fleet Reserve Fund - Stormwater Fund 1,255 614 692 788 896 1,018 1,168 1,337 1,531 2,002 11,302 Grant_Donation_Developer Contribution 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 449 TIF District Financing - Trade-In Generated Revenues - Other - TOTAL FUNDING SOURCES:1,300 659 737 833 941 1,063 1,213 1,382 1,576 2,047 11,751 STATUS: DESCRIPTION: Various projects in neighborhoods: Hayes Ave, Mayfair Park, Laurel Hill, Kensington Ct, Stonehenge, Oak Creek Village and Pheasant Way. ACOE Projects off Midas Dr, replace culvert on Market St and at Bartlett Brook N. PW- Materials and equipment storage. Engineering - Potash, Bartlet, Munroe. Develop Flow Restoration plans as required by draft MS4 permit. OPERATING BUDGET IMPACT: JUSTIFICATION: Improve water quality and control quantity as well as comply with related regulations. AVG ESTIMATED SAVINGS PER YEAR: FINANCIALS COMMENT: will use other funding sources as available AVE ESTIMATED REVENUES PER YEAR: Public Works/Justin Rabidoux 106 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com MEMORANDUM TO: Kevin Dorn, City Manager South Burlington City Council FROM: Paul Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning SUBJECT: Public Hearings on Land Development Regulations Article IX and Official Map (Wheeler Nature Park) amendments DATE: December 7, 2015 City Council meeting Last month the City Council warned two sets of public hearings on the draft Land Development Regulations & Official Map approved by the Planning Commission on November 10th. December 7th is the first of these hearings. At this hearing, the City Council will be taking input on the draft amendments to Article IX (Southeast Quadrant), a related change to the Zoning Map to create a new zoning district, SEQ-Neighborhood Residential North, and a change to the Official Map removing a portion of the Wheeler Nature Park from designation as park and open space. These amendments are largely the implementation of the JAM Golf settlement agreement. The agreement, signed earlier this summer by the Council, called for zoning amendments to allow for the agreed-upon level and type of development on the land to be exchanged to JAM Golf from the southwest corner of the Wheeler Nature Park. As will be presented on Monday by a member of the Planning Commission, the draft regulations were developed by a working group of six individuals plus staff representing the Planning Commission, South Burlington Land Trust, Bike-Ped Committee, and the developers. These amendments were presented to the Planning Commission, considered, and approved as part of their November 10th package. A small handful of very minor housekeeping changes to Article IX are also included in these amendments. Staff will be happy to go over these if the Council wishes at the meeting. A copy of the Regulations can be found online at www.sburl.com . CITY COUNCIL 16 NOVEMBER 2015 The South Burlington City Council held a regular meeting on Monday, 16 November 2015, at 6:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. MEMBERS PRESENT: P. Nowak, Chair; H. Riehle, C. Shaw, M. Emery, T. Chittenden ALSO PRESENT: K. Dorn, City Manager; T. Hubbard, Deputy City Manager; I. Blanchard, Project Manager; P. Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning; L. Kupferman, B. Nowak, T. Barritt, B. L’Ecuyer, N. Warner, R. Kosloski, D. Crawford, T. Dauham, J. Marshall 1. Agenda Review: Additions, deletions or changes in order of agenda items: Mr. Dorn clarified that Agenda item #10 is a first reading and the setting of a warning for a public hearing. 2. Comments & Questions from the public not related to the agenda: There were no issues raised. 3. Announcements and City Manager’s Report: Mr. Dorn: Encore Development has filed for a Certificate of Public Good with the Public Service Board in conjunction with the landfill solar project. A meeting was held with Lee Dore regarding stewardship plan for maintaining public buildings. The Police and Public Works are preparing for the winter parking ban. There will be a brochure, signage, ads in The Other Paper, etc., beginning on 1 December. Ms. Nowak suggested flyers on parked cars to give people a warning. Mr. Dorn noted they usually wait 2 weeks before towing. Met with the Library Trustees regarding opportunities in City Center and asked that they be sure that the program is what they want in a Library. Ms. Nowak asked if the city has heard back from UVM regarding how they will help monitor parking at Quarry Hill. Mr. Dorn said that Paul Conner spoke with UVM people today to clarify that. Ms. Nowak noted the concern of nearby residents in the new structures that this will be even more of a problem next year. CITY COUNCIL 16 NOVEMBER 2015 PAGE 2 Council members reported on meetings and events they had attended. Ms. Emery expressed concern with the new Airport noise maps which show that more homes are now in the area deemed unfit for residential use. She said that this is due to the afterburners now being used by the F-16s and that and EIS and noise exposure maps that should have been done when the afterburners were put into use were not done. She asked for a dialog with the Airport and the National Guard regarding noise abatement. Ms. Nowak said she would research this with the Airport Director. Ms. Emery moved to put a discussion of Airport noise on the Other Business agenda. Ms. Riehle seconded. The vote on the motion was 2-3, and the motion was deemed to have failed. Mr. Shaw and Mr. Chittenden said they would like to see this on a future agenda. Ms. Emery suggested doing this before the 10 December deadline for the comment period on the new maps. Ms. Nowak suggested inviting the Airport Manager in for the first meeting in December and at the same time requesting a representative from the Air Guard to be present specifically to discuss issues regarding the change in engines without an EIS and noise study. Members agreed. 4. Consent Agenda: A. Sign Disbursement B. Approve Minutes for 2 November 2015 Mr. Shaw moved to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Volunteer Committee Interviews: The Council interviewed Larry Kupferman for appointment to the Housing Trust Committee. Mr. Kupferman reviewed his service as CEDO Office Director in Burlington where there is an active affordable housing program and trust fund. He also has a seat on the Trust Fund Committee in Burlington. Mr. Kupferman noted that because of his time on the South Burlington DRB, he also understands how development happens in South Burlington. Ms. Nowak said that because South Burlington is new at this, Mr. Kupferman’s experience would be very valuable. CITY COUNCIL 16 NOVEMBER 2015 PAGE 3 Mr. Dorn noted that to have a committee of 3, one more candidate is needed. Ms. Nowak said that since there are 2 very good candidates, she would like to move ahead on appointments so this can be gotten into place. She also suggested asking the former Affordable Housing Committee to come together and possibly help find a person who would like to fill the third spot on the new committee. Ms. Riehle said she was willing to serve as City Council representative to the Affordable Housing Committee and felt there could be additional information the Committee can provide that could help inform the new committee. 6. Consider and possibly approve a proposed 4th Amendment to Lease Agreement between the City of South Burlington & Dorset Park Skating Association, Inc.: Ms. Riehle noted the need to update the name of the Park in the body of the agreement to “Veteran’s Park.” Mr. L’Ecuyer said they have an opportunity for a 20-year agreement for a solar array that would save $8000-9000 a year in electric billing. The solar array is in Bethel, nothing local. Ms. Emery asked how they would use the saved money. Mr. L’Ecuyer said it would help maintain where they are now, as rates will be going up 5%. Mr. Chittenden said he saw no reason to say no. Mr. Koslowski noted they lease the facility for $1.00 a year, and the organization runs the arena. They need a legal entity to buy the power for. The city would not be obligated on the solar deal. The current electric bill is about $21,000 a month, and they have tried everything to reduce consumption. Ms. Emery asked about more public time at the arena. Mr. L’Ecuyer said they have 6 public sessions a week, including a very popular Saturday afternoon session. There is added time for children during the holidays. He noted the number of public skaters has gone down over the years. CITY COUNCIL 16 NOVEMBER 2015 PAGE 4 Ms. Riehle moved to accept the 4th amendment to the lease agreement between the City of South Burlington and the Dorset Park Skating Association, with the park name change amendment. Mr. Shaw seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Winooski Valley Park District presentation: Mr. Warner, Executive Director, reviewed the history of the Park District which includes 222 acres of flood plain and 553 acres of significant wetland. The District includes 4 parks in South Burlington which will be added to by a donation from S. D. Ireland of 6.23 acres and a trail easement on Grove Street. Mr. Warner showed this area on the map and said it will create a viable park/natural area. Mr. Warner then reviewed upgrades done this year in various areas including a trail at Muddy Brook Natural Reserve. There is a new Forest Management Plan for 2016. The District also does a lot of environmental education and has a camp which will be expanded to 8-week sessions this year. Mr. Warner then reviewed the budgeting approach and stressed that they are doing everything possible to be financially responsible. There will be new income from a “forest pre-school,” summer camp and February “vacation camp.” They are also bringing in school groups after school and are renting the picnic shelter. Mr. Warner also explained how the funding formula is put together by averaging out the grand list for each member town. South Burlington’s share for FY17 will be 55,114 (up from $54,000 in FY16). Ms. Riehle asked if they could do a combination of grand list and acreage. Mr. Crawford said they discuss this to some degree at every meeting. Since they are a creation of the State Legislature, it would require agreement of all 7 towns to make a revision. Mr. Chittenden suggested applying projects for specific acreage to the communities in which that acreage is located. Mr. Warner noted they charge no entry fees to parks from dawn to dust. Each property has specific rules. There are no playgrounds, ballfields, etc. CITY COUNCIL 16 NOVEMBER 2015 PAGE 5 Ms. Nowak noted that 80% of the budget is for salaries/benefits and questioned whether anything else suffers because of that. She noted that the subtotal for park expenses decreases from year to year and asked if they are deferring maintenance. Mr. Warner acknowledged there is some deferred maintenance. There has been a decrease in snow removal with new tenants, and some of the decrease is “just luck.” He added that they do get a lot of money from grants, bartering, volunteer labor, etc., that doesn’t show up in the budget. They are committed to keeping the municipal amounts as low as possible and are always looking for new revenue sources. Mr. Hubbard said it is good to know how the calculation for the assessment is worked out as it helps the city look at it in terms of what South Burlington’s assessment will be. He also noted there have been good conversations with Mr. Warner and Mr. Crawford regarding future opportunities for South Burlington including serious maintenance in city parks. He looked forward to continued discussions. 8. CCTV Presentation: Ms. Dauham reported on the ongoing negotiations with Comcast as Comcast is seeking renewal of its Certificate of Public Good. CCTV is bringing up issues with regard to noncompliance with the present Certificate of Public Good, specifically issues regarding the electronic public guide (which needs to be fixed) and access to high definition (which Comcast is reluctant to provide). Ms. Dauham then reviewed the history of the Trust Agreement and noted many changes will be needed as Essex/Essex Junction would like to combine under one representative. South Burlington would need to ratify the changes by the end of December. Ms. Dauham then gave members the proposed budget for FY17. She noted that South Burlington gets $60,000 worth of services for which the city pays $5000. Next year, CCTV will be streaming meetings live on line. They are requesting an additional $5000 a year. Ms. Nowak noted that the City of Burlington gets more programs. Ms. Dauham said they pay $20,000 a year more in addition to a base fee. They also get some events done by volunteers whom Channel 17 trains at no cost. South Burlington could do this as well. CITY COUNCIL 16 NOVEMBER 2015 PAGE 6 Ms. Dauham said it would help CCTV if South Burlington wrote to the Public Service Board asking them to get Comcast to comply with their Certificate of Public Good. CCTV will also provide the wording for ratification of the Trust Agreement changes. 9. First Reading and Set Public Hearing on FY17-FY26 Capital Improvement Plan: Ms. Blanchard said the Plan is still in draft form. Staff is proposing 7 December for a public hearing. Ms. Blanchard then reviewed additions to the plan including: a. Reduced proposed general fund sourced revenue by $700,000 b. Added proposed parks improvements by proposed ½ cent from Open Space Fund c. Increased City Center cost estimates d. Intersection work at Kimball Avenue e. Facilities stewardship proposed reserve fund f. Improvements to 19 Gregory Drive g. Information technology expenditures Ms. Blanchard showed a graph of the “big picture,” including those things funded by the general fund (including fees, local option taxes, etc.) and total expenditures (excluding sewer and stormwater). She reviewed sources of funding for various departments (general fund, anticipated debt proceeds, impact fees, open space funds, etc.). Mr. Chittenden was concerned that a bike/rec path is scheduled for 2020 while the soccer field goes in in 2017. He anticipated more bike and pedestrian traffic on Allen Road as a result of the field. Mr. Shaw agreed. Mr. Conner said prioritization may be which rec path advances more quickly in the city. The top priority now is Hinesburg road. Scoping studies are now being done for rec paths, including Allen Road from Baycrest to Spear. Mr. Shaw was concerned with the lower part of Allen Road from Shelburne Rd. Mr. Conner said that would be noted. Mr. Hubbard noted that S. D. Ireland is building the soccer field at their cost. It will be 2019 by the time it is used as the field has to sit for a year before use. CITY COUNCIL 16 NOVEMBER 2015 PAGE 7 Ms. Blanchard reviewed the funding for rec paths (grants, developers and recreation impact fees). She also reviewed sidewalk and road funding sources (general fund, grants, bonds, highway impact fees, recreation impact fees). She also noted the need for more diverse funding. Ms. Blanchard then reviewed City Center funding sources over 10 years (including reserve fund project cost funding, and financing cost funding). Ms. Riehle then moved to set the public hearing on the FY17-FY26 Capital Improvement Plan for 7 December 2015, at 6:30 p.m. 10. Social Service Funding Level and Allocations Approval: Ms. Nowak noted she had kept the total level with some allocations going up, some down. Mr. Shaw and Ms. Riehle each suggested a methodology for this (throwing out the highs and lows or a percent of the budget that serves South Burlington residents). Mr. Hubbard suggested a 3% increase to $38,975. Ms. Riehle was OK with using that as a total. Ms. Riehle moved to allocate $38,975 for social services funding for FY17. Ms. Emery seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 11. Review Responses to surveys from the East Terrace/Spear Street Neighborhood related to an “overlay district) that would address the conversion of properties: Ms. Emery noted there was a clear split with strong numbers for and against an “overlay district.” She felt it should go back to a neighborhood forum. Mr. Chittenden said he would not support a “heavy handed” city response and agreed with sending the issue back to the neighborhood. Mr. Shaw agreed, but said it still doesn’t let the city “off the hook.” He said there could be incentives to return rentals to “owner occupied” as Burlington did. CITY COUNCIL 16 NOVEMBER 2015 PAGE 8 Ms. Riehle noted a significant number of people asking to enforce the existing rules. She also would encourage the neighborhood to come up with additional ideas and stressed the need to assure neighbors that the Council will take ideas seriously and consider them. Mr. Dorn noted there are currently 3 enforcement actions ongoing, 2 in that neighborhood. Ms. Nowak said the city can’t force the neighbors to form an association. She also noted that some people bought their properties as an investment. She believed the city had done its part and there now has to be discussion among the neighbors. Ms. Riehle felt there could be more discussion regarding parking, possibly a parking sticker requirement. Ms. Nowak noted there are parking restrictions from 6 a.m.-6 p.m. She would like to say if there isn’t adequate parking for 4 unrelated people, there is to be no parking on the grass. 12. Acknowledge receipt from the Planning Commission of draft amendments to the Land Development Regulations and accompanying report and draft amendments to the Official Map and accompanying report: Mr. Conner said the Planning Commission voted to submit the amendments to the Council. This action “starts the clock ticking.” The Council acknowledged receipt of both documents and reports. 13. Consider Warning public hearings on draft amendments to the Land Development Regulations and Official Map: a. Article 9 of the Land Development Regulations; accompanying change to the official Zoning Map to establish the SEQ-NRN subdistrict; and amendment to the Official Map to remove a small area on Wheeler Nature Park from the designation of “existing park and open space.” b. All other amendments proposed by the Planning Commission to the Land Development Regulations and Official Map. CITY COUNCIL 16 NOVEMBER 2015 PAGE 9 Mr. Conner said the suggestion is to do this in 2 parts as there is a time constraint (December 31) for Article 9. He recommended warning a public hearing for that part of the LDRs and the official map for 7 December 2015. This will allow for compliance by 31 December 2015. Ms. Emery moved to warn a public hearing for 7 December 2015, 7:15 p.m., on Article 9 of the Land Development Regulations as specified above, and the accompanying amendment to the Official Map, as above. Ms. Riehle seconded. The motion passed 4-1 with Mr. Shaw opposing. Mr. Conner noted that section “b” includes the rest of the amendments to the LDRs and asked if the Council wanted a presentation by the Planning Commission on this. He suggested 21 December with either the entire Commission or representatives. Ms. Emery moved to warn public hearings for part “b” above for Monday 21 December, 7 p.m. Mr. Shaw seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Mr. Conner said these items will be placed in the newspaper on Thursday. State law said that when the draft notice is published, the new regulations are in effect. 14. Overview of October Financial Statements: Mr. Hubbard noted that the city is 1/3 through the budget year, and there are no major concerns. 28% or revenues have been received including a local option tax check received today. 15. Liquor Control Board: Mr. Shaw moved that the Council convene as Liquor Control Board. Ms. Emery seconded. Motion passed unanimously. The Board considered a first class license application for Barnyard, 1705 Williston Road. No issues were raised. Ms. Emery moved to approve the first class liquor license for Barnyard as presented. Mr. Chittenden seconded. Motion passed unanimously. CITY COUNCIL 16 NOVEMBER 2015 PAGE 10 Mr. Shaw noted there is a new owner of Infinity, which usually requires a license change which the Council has not seen. Mr. Dorn will check on this. 16. Other Business: a. Items held from the Consent Agenda: No items were held. b. Other: Ms. Emery asked if there is any word regarding the Airport law suit. Mr. Dorn said the trial date is not yet set, and it will probably be after the first of the year. Mr. Dorn noted that Maggie Leugers got the idea to offer coffee/donuts to taxpayers and Dunkin’ Doughnuts provided this. As there was no further business to come before the Council, Mr. Shaw moved to adjourn. Ms. Riehle seconded. Motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m. ________________________________ Clerk 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4107 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com REGULAR MEETING To: Kevin Dorn, City Manager From: Ilona Blanchard, Project Director Re: A Resolution Authorizing the South Burlington City Manager to Negotiate and Execute Certain Agreements with Altus Power America, Inc. to Develop and Operate a Net-Metering Solar Array on the City Landfill Date: December 4, 2015 Background: In order to stabilize and/or reduce costs related to electrical usage, and otherwise to improve the long term sustainability, the City has been seeking renewable energy generation resources. The City’s closed landfill has come up frequently as a potential site. The South Burlington Energy Committee is strongly in support of the development of a solar array on the City’s landfill. Recently, Encore Redevelopment proposed Altus Power America as a site developer. Altus Power America is a company located in Greenwich, CT that develops, owns and operates solar arrays primarily in the northeast and has experience developing arrays on landfills. City Landfill Net Metering Project Legislative language put forward by Senators Ashe and Lyons last year extended net-metering financial benefits to projects over 0.5 MW if they are on municipal landfills. This offsets the additional costs of placing a solar array on these sites. It also exempts these projects from the cap on total net- metering delivered to the grid during peak load. Prior to engineering, Encore is estimating that the project would generate approximately 2,800,000 kWh per year. The City is partnering with the School District due to the volume of net- metering credits the project will produce. Sharing the credits with the School District ensures that 100% of the credit value generated by the project is absorbed and that the potential financial benefit to South Burlington residents is retained. Net Metering and Lease Agreements In the proposed net metering agreement, the City and the School District agree to receive (purchase) the energy and “solar adder” net metering credits generated by the project for 25 years. The energy credit is the residential rate for electricity, currently 14.753 cents per kWh. The “solar adder” net metering credit is the difference between 19 cents and the residential rate at the time the array is built. Once the “solar adder” is set, it is fixed and available for the first 10 years of operation. The energy credit is available for the full 25 years and will be equal to GMP’s residential rate as set by the Public Service Board (a variable value). Altus Power America will construct, own and maintain the solar array. The customers (the City and the School District) will pay Altus Power America 13.9 cents per net-metering kWh credit received on their electric bills each month for the term of the agreement. The term of the agreement is for 25 years. For the first ten years (when the net-metering credit is the “solar adder” plus the residential rate energy credit) each net-metering credit received will have a monetary value of approximately 19 cents. For years 11-25 each net-metering credit received will have the same value as residential rate per kWh at that time. Net-metering credits will be applied to the bills for the City’s two largest meters each month, with additional credits being applied to the School District’s meters. The financial savings (loss) from this offer is calculated as the monetary value of the net-metering credits received on electric bills minus the payment to Altus Power America per credit received. The project monetary value for the City and the School District will depend upon the rate at which the cost of electricity per kWh changes. Historically, the price of a GMP kWh of electricity has increased, on average, 3% per year. If the average kWh price increase over 25 years is 1.5% annually the project is estimated to yield over $3,400,000 (NPV $1,600,000) to the City and the School District. If the average kWh price increase annually over 25 years is zero, the project is estimated to yield $1,800,000 (NPV $1,000,000) to the City and the School District. If the average kWh price annual change over 25 years is -1% (i.e. the price falls steadily), the Project is estimated to yield $600,000 total. In this scenario after the first ten years, the City and the School District would pay more for credits then the value of the credits. Note that the credits would go onto the City’s meters first with fewer on the School District’s meters. This results in more exposure to higher credit costs (or credit value) for the City and less for the School District. Altus Power America will be responsible for maintenance costs above the surface and for items below the surface which are due to the presence of the solar array and for any new infrastructure such as stormwater treatment which may be required to be installed. The proposed lease is for the value of $1 annually. The City will not be responsible for taxes on the array. The City will continue to be responsible for maintaining and monitoring the landfill itself. The Lease also provides the City with the option to buy out the developer after six years should the City prefer to own the Solar Array. Net Metering FAQs How much electricity could the City get from the landfill? Zero. The electricity from the solar array will go directly into the power grid. As it goes into the power grid, GMP measures the electricity to determine how many credits the City and the School District should receive on their electrical bills. The School District and the City will then receive a net-metering credit on electrical bills for each kWh produced by the landfill. How will the contract allocate net-metering credits? GMP will receive a list of meters on which to provide credits each month. The credits will be applied to each meter down the list. As the first meter is “filled” or receives sufficient credits to “zero out” the bill, remaining credits are applied to the next meter and so on down the list. If the monetary value of the credits is more than the value of all the bills combined, excess credits will be applied to the last bill in the list. The first two meter will be the City’s two largest meters which have an annual cost to the City of approximately $300,000, and all remaining meters in the list will be School District meters. What is the value to the City? Approximately $80,000 per year for the first ten years. It is estimated that the City will absorb approximately $300,000 worth of net-metering credits in each of the first ten years on its two highest electricity bills. $300,000 divided by .19 (the value of each net-metering credit in cents that we receive) results in the total number of credits we can absorb, multiply this by the difference between .19 (the value of the net-metering credit) and .139 (the value in cents that what we pay per net-metering credit to Altus Power America) or .051 (5.1 cents per kWh) and this results in just over $80,000. What happens in ten years after the “solar adder” expires depends on what the energy market does. If the price of energy stays flat, then the difference between the net-metering credit and the price the City pays Altus Power America is only .0085 (.85 cents). This results in $23,800 annually total. The City would absorb the first $300,000 of netmetering credits ($300,000/.1475), which multiplied by .0085 cents, results in approximately $17,288 for the City and approximately $6,000 for the School. What are the risks to the City? The primary risk is in rate volatility: the rate paid for the net metering credits will be set for the 25 year term (13.9 cents) while the realized credit value will fluctuate with the rate of electricity (starting rate of 19 cents per kWh). There would have to have an annual average residential rate decline of approximately .2% over 25 years to result in higher costs. The agreement will commit the City to purchase net-metering credits regardless of the residential rate per kWh. Over the long run, the Net Metering Agreement can be conceptualized as freezing a portion of the City’s cost for energy. Will the City’s power be green? No. All environmental attributes will accrue to the array developer. What is the timeline? Permitting will take place in the winter of 2015-16. Construction would take place in 2016, with the project coming online in late 2016. Attachments: Resolution Authorizing the South Burlington City Manager to Negotiate and Execute Agreements Certain Agreements with Altus Power America, Inc. to Develop and Operate a Net-Metering Solar Array on the City Landfill. Policy: Achieve a reduction of 20% in carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions from 2009 levels by 2020 through an increase renewable energy production and reductions in energy use in the following sectors: transportation, commercial/industrial, residential, municipal/school – Energy Committee recommended goal for the draft South Burlington Comprehensive Plan Recommendation: Review and consider approving the resolution. RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE CERTAIN AGREEMENTS WITH ALTUS POWER AMERICA, INC. TO DEVELOP AND OPERATE A NET-METERING SOLAR ARRAY ON THE CITY LANDFILL WHEREAS, the City of South Burlington has an interest in reducing the City’s dependence upon non-renewable energy sources and reducing energy costs; and, WHEREAS, Altus Power America, Inc., has proposed to develop a 2.2 megawatt (DC) net- metered solar array on the City landfill and to sell the net metering credits generated by the array to the City of South Burlington and the South Burlington School District; and, WHEREAS, the purchase of net metering credits generated by this solar array by the City and the School District is anticipated to provide energy cost savings for the City and the School District; and, WHEREAS, the South Burlington Energy Committee has proposed that the City of South Burlington, “Achieve a reduction of 20% in carbon dioxide-equivalent emissions from 2009 levels by 2020 through an increase in renewable energy production and reductions in energy use in the following sectors: transportation, commercial/industrial, residential, municipal/school;” and, WHEREAS, the City is participating in the Georgetown Energy Prize Competition and this will contribute to the City’s efforts; and, WHEREAS, this project presents some financial risk but would reduce the carbon footprint of the City and School District and potentially provide financial savings to City taxpayers. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the South Burlington City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to negotiate and execute a Solar Site Surface Lease Agreement and a Solar Net Metering Credit Agreement with Altus Power America, Inc., and the South Burlington School District for development of a net-metered solar array on the City landfill and for the purchase of net-metering credits. Approved this 7th day of December, 2015. SOUTH BURLINGTON CITY COUNCIL _________________________________ ______________________________ Pat Nowak, Chair Chris Shaw, Vice Chair _________________________________ ______________________________ Helen Riehle, Clerk Tom Chittenden ________________________________ Meaghan Emery 2 November 2015 MEMO TO: Channel 17 Member Municipalities FROM: Lauren-Glenn Davitian on behalf of the Channel 17 Trustees RE: Amendment of Channel 17 Government Access Channel Trust Agreement Channel 17/ Town Meeting Television opened the door to local government in 1990 and serves the citizens and cable subscribers of Burlington, South Burlington, Essex, Essex Junction, Winooski, Williston and Colchester. These member municipalities appoint representatives the the Chittenden County Government Access Trust to represent their interestes and to oversee channel 17 policy and finances. The Trust is controlled by drafted and signed in 1990. This document, attached, specifies each member municipality is entitled to one municipal representative to the Channel 17 Trustees (section 3B) and allocates the votes of each representatives based on the number of Comcast subscribers in each municipality (Appendix A: Proportional Voting Formula). i In September, the Town of Essex and Village of Essex Junction agreed to combine their to representatives into one. This triggers two amendment to the Trust Agreement, noted above, which requires ratification by 2/3ds of both the Trustees and the legislative bodies of the member municipalities as follows. The Trustees request that each of the member municipalities authorize a resolution that enables these amendments to be made to the Channel 17 Trust Agreement no later than December 31 2015. Here is a draft Resolution for your consideration: WHEREAS, Channel 17/ Town Meeting Television opened the door to local government in 1990 to serve the citizens and cable subscribers of Burlington, South Burlington, Essex, Essex Junction, Winooski, Williston and Colchester; and WHEREAS, these member municipalities appoint representatives the the Chittenden County Government Access Trust to represent their interestes and to oversee channel 17 policy and finances; and WHEREAS, the Channel 17 Trust is controlled by the Channel 17 Government Access Channel Trust Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Trust Agreement specifies that each member municipality is entitled to one municipal representative to the Channel 17 Trustees (section 3B); and WHEREAS, the Trust Agreement allocates the votes of each representatives based on the number of Comcast subscribers in each municipality (Appendix A); and WHEREAS, In September 2016, the Town of Essex and Village of Essex Junction agreed to combine their to representatives into one; and WHEREAS, this action by two municipal members calls for the amendment of two Trust Agreement conditions two amendment to the Trust Agreement, noted above; and WHEREAS, the Trust Agreement specifies that amendments to the Trust Agreement require ratification by 2/3ds of both the municipal Trustees and the legislative bodies of the member municipalities within 90 days of the request; and WHEREAS, Channel 17 Trustees request that each of the member municipalities authorize a resolution that enables these amendments to be made to the Channel 17 Trust Agreement no later than December 31 2015. BE IT RESOLVED that the legislative body of (insert name of municipality) does hereby support the amendment of the Chittenden County Government Access Trust Agreement to enable Essex and Essex Junction to be served by one municipal representative; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the legislative body of (insert name of municipality) does hereby support the combining of Essex and Essex Junction proportional votes outlined in the Trust Agreement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this Resolution be sent to the office of Channel 17 located at 294 North Winooski Avenue in Burlington Vermont. i The 2015 voting breaks down as follows: Burlington: 15 votes, Colchester: 1 vote, Essex Town: 9 votes, Essex Junction Village: 2 votes, St. George: 1 vote, South Burlington: 13 votes, Williston: 5 votes, Winooski: 4 votes