Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda 07_SP-22-056_154 daVinci Dr_BETA Parking_memo 180 Market Street, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 | 802-846-4106 | www.southburlingtonvt.gov TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Marla Keene, Development Review Planner SUBJECT: #SP-22-024 420 daVinci Drive DATE: December 6, 2022 Development Review Board meeting PROJECT DESCRIPTION Site plan application #SP-22-056 of Beta Technologies, Inc., to amend a previously approved plan for a 344,000 sf manufacturing and office building. The amendment consists of adding 261 parking spaces, 154 daVinci Drive. PERMIT HISTORY The previously approved plan for this project included #MP-21-02, a Master Plan approval for the development of the Beta Air, LLC, complex which was proposed to be developed in four phases. The present site plan application seeks to amend the previously approved plan for a 344,000 sf manufacturing and office building which was approved as part of the first phase of development at this site. At the time of the approval of Master Plan #MP-21-02, the applicant was unable to secure approval for its proposed parking lot because the parking lot was proposed to be in front of the associated manufacturing and office facility, and City regulations require parking to be located to the rear or side of uses on the property. Accordingly, the applicant applied in Preliminary & Final Plat application #SD-21- 28 for the maximum amount of parking that they were able to have under those regulations, and was approved for a parking area measuring no more than 195 feet in width and containing 41 spaces. CONTEXT After the approval of Preliminary & Final Plat application #SD-21-28, the South Burlington Planning Commission and South Burlington City Council approved the adoption of Article 14.06(A)(2)(b)(viii) in the Land Development Regulations, as well as several other amendments affecting the requirements and procedure for review of master plans. 14.06(A)(2)(b)(viii) provides an exemption to the limits on the placement of parking areas when that parking area is constructed to serve a building, or a portion thereof, that is contained within the Security Identification Display Area (SIDA) of a publicly owned and operated airport. A portion of the approved 344,000 sf manufacturing and office building that is the principal structure on this site is located within the SIDA. As such, the applicant is requesting the approval of this site plan amendment to allow for expansion and relocation of the proposed parking area as pursuant to the exemption outlined above. However, master plan approval #MP-21-02 contains the following finding pertaining to parking. The Board finds the master plan meets 14.06B(2) but until such time as the red phase is constructed, the applicant may only build the portion of the parking which is to the side or rear of the existing building (3060 Williston Road) to remain until the red phase is constructed and which is less than ½ the total building width along the street frontage, as shown in the below illustration. This latter provision applies only to buildings or portions of buildings which are not separated from the street by parking. The applicant must therefore amend SD-21-28 to meet this requirement. In amending SD-21-28, the applicant may propose additional permanent or temporary parking to the side of the building in the blue phase. Since the master plan finding does not allow for parking to be constructed as currently proposed, the applicant must amend their master plan prior to seeking approval for this application #SP-22-056. Such master plan amendment will allow the Board to modify the above referenced finding for consistency with the current regulations, after which the applicant may proceed with this application. Further, the applicant has appealed #MP-21-02 to the Environmental Court, which appeal is still pending. Recommendation Staff recommends the Board continue the site plan application until Wednesday February 22, 2023, which will allow sufficient time for the court to remand the master plan application to the DRB, and for the applicant to prepare an application for master plan under the current LDR, including the amended submission requirements, and for that application to at least begin DRB review prior to the continued hearing. Respectfully submitted, Marla Keene, P.E. Development Review Planner