The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSD-22-10 - Supplemental - 0500 Old Farm Road (79)1 Marla Keene From:Erica Quallen Sent:Wednesday, November 2, 2022 2:12 PM To:Marla Keene Cc:Tom Dipietro Subject:RE: SD-22-10 O'Brien Eastview - revisions Hi Marla – Please find my comments below on the signal, pavement marking, and bike/ped plans. One question I had is that Exhibit 105 was titled as the Kimball/Old Farm pavement marking plan but it is a traffic control sheet. Could you send along the pavement marking plan, please? I’m not sure if this was an error in their submission or just a misnaming of the file. Let me know if you need anything else from me. Thanks! Erica General Comments  Add pedestrian pushbutton symbol to legend (all signal sheets)  Please change “new bike path” to “new shared use path” (all sheets) Exhibit 099  Since the driveway approach will become signalized and include pedestrian signals, detectable warning surfaces should be added before the crossing on both sides of the driveway.  Relocate westbound Left Lane Must Turn Left (R3-7) sign to ~50’ before stop bar  Add eastbound Left Lane Must Turn Left (R3-7) sign ~50’ before stop bar Exhibit 100  Relocate westbound Left Lane Must Turn Left (R3-7) sign to at ~50’ before stop bar  Add eastbound Left Lane Must Turn Left (R3-7) sign to ~50’ before stop bar Exhibit 106  Pavement markings on Old Farm Road and Potash Road are shifted right on the page. Just looks like they were moved by accident, but please fix.  What is the pink line across the current Old Farm Road alignment?  Relocate Left Lane Must Turn Left (R3-7) signs to ~50’ before stop bar Exhibit 107  Typo in “Handicap parking sign” legend entry  What is the crosshair type symbol above the “Old Farm Road” label on the lower figure?  Please show curb lines on existing (unshaded) sections of Old Farm Road Exhibit 108  Please show curb lines on existing (unshaded) sections of Old Farm Road Exhibit 109  Please show curb lines on existing (unshaded) sections of Old Farm Road  Black outline on the sidewalk between the speed hump and Daniel Drive is missing 2  Please add gravel path hatch to legend  Please maintain width of the first driveway off O’Brien Farm Ext. (lower figure). Current configuration may encourage people to drive on the adjacent sidewalk Exhibit 110  It is unclear what is happening with the pavement and driveways on Eastview Lane (lower figure). Are those driveway aprons but unpaved driveways? Also, what is the hatch in this location representing?  Please add gravel path hatch to legend Exhibit 127  Can a crosswalk across Two Brothers Drive be added at Ledge Way? Notice - Under Vermont’s Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Marla Keene <mkeene@southburlingtonvt.gov> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2022 4:23 PM To: Tom Dipietro <tdipietro@southburlingtonvt.gov>; Erica Quallen <equallen@southburlingtonvt.gov>; Dave Wheeler <dwheeler@southburlingtonvt.gov>; Craig Lambert <clambert@southburlingtonvt.gov>; Terry Francis <tfrancis@southburlingtonvt.gov>; Ed Spooner <espooner@southburlingtonvt.gov>; Holly Rees <hrees@southburlingtonvt.gov>; Jay Nadeau <jay.nadeau@champlainwater.org> Cc: Paul Conner <pconner@southburlingtonvt.gov> Subject: RE: SD-22-10 O'Brien Eastview - revisions Hi Everyone, as previewed, here is a link to the revised submission. \\192.168.9.13\apps\USERS\Planning & Zoning\Development Review Board\Applications\2022\SD-22-10_500 Old Farm Road_OBrien Eastview_FP_2022-07-19 All superseded materials have been moved to the sub-folder “NOLF-SSD,” while files in the main folder (and “plans” sub- folder) are all current. The (short by O’Brien standards) narrative accompanying this revised submission is attached and in the main project folder. Please review and provide your final comments by Friday November 4. 3 I’ve also set up a static copy of this project folder on sharepoint: SD-22-10_500 Old Farm Road_OBrien Eastview_FP_2022-07-19 My intention is for Jay to use this folder since he doesn’t have access to the network but others are welcome to use it read-only as well. Marla Keene, PE Development Review Planner City of South Burlington (802) 846-4106 From: Marla Keene Sent: Friday, October 14, 2022 10:26 AM To: Tom Dipietro <tdipietro@southburlingtonvt.gov>; Erica Quallen <equallen@southburlingtonvt.gov>; Dave Wheeler <dwheeler@southburlingtonvt.gov>; Craig Lambert <clambert@southburlingtonvt.gov>; Terry Francis <tfrancis@southburlingtonvt.gov>; Ed Spooner <espooner@southburlingtonvt.gov>; Holly Rees <hrees@southburlingtonvt.gov>; Jay Nadeau <jay.nadeau@champlainwater.org> Cc: Paul Conner <pconner@southburlingtonvt.gov> Subject: SD-22-10 O'Brien Eastview - revisions Hey folks, Just a heads up that we’re expecting a complete package of revised materials for O’Brien Eastview on October 25, which attempts to address all the comments from you and from the Board. I’ll turn the materials around to you as quickly as I am able (hopefully that day). Please set aside time to review and provide your final feedback (hopefully saying all is satisfactory) by Friday November 4; my report is due the Wednesday after. They usually prepare a lengthy cover memo going through everything line by line, and they’re already up to 217 attachments (including both documents and plans) so please plan accordingly. Marla Keene, PE Development Review Planner City of South Burlington 180 Market Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4106 www.southburlingtonvt.gov Notice - Under Vermont’s Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation.