Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda 05_SP-22-045_1650 Shelburne Road_Jeep#SP-22-045 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING SRTB HOLDINGS, LLC 1650 SHELBURNE ROAD SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-22-045 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Site plan application #SP-22-045 of SRTB Holdings, LLC to modify a previously approved plan for a 10,210 sf automotive sales, service and repair building on an existing 2.07-acre lot. The amendment consists of a 3,650 square foot expansion, including an addition on the existing sales/showroom and the construction of a drop-off area for the vehicle service department, 1650 Shelburne Road. The Development Review Board held public hearings on September 20, 2022 and October 18, 2022. Kevin Warden with Engineering Ventures, Brian Hoar with Goss Dodge and SRTB Holdings, Matthew Tyler with SRA Architects, and Brent Kosoc with BBL Construction Services represented the applicant. Based on testimony provided at the above-mentioned public hearing and the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. This project consists of Site plan application #SP-22-045 of SRTB Holdings, LLC to modify a previously approved plan for a 10,210 sf automotive sales, service and repair building on an existing 2.07-acre lot. The amendment consists of a 3,650 square foot expansion, including an addition on the existing sales/showroom and the construction of a drop-off area for the vehicle service department, 1650 Shelburne Road. 2. The subject property is located in the Commercial 2 Zoning District, Traffic Overlay Zoning District Zone 3, Transit Overlay District, and Urban Design Overlay District. 3. The owner of record of the subject property is SRTB Holdings, LLC 4. The application was received on August 25, 2022. 5. The plans submitted consist of the following: Sheet No. Description Prepared By Last Revised Date C001 Cover Sheet Engineering Ventures 10/04/2022 C002 Site Legend and Notes Engineering Ventures 10/04/2022 C100 Existing Conditions Plan Engineering Ventures 10/04/2022 C101 Demolition Plan Engineering Ventures 10/04/2022 C102 Site Layout Plan Engineering Ventures 10/04/2022 C103 Grading & Utility Plan Engineering Ventures 10/04/2022 C104 Erosion Prevention & Sediment Control (EPSC) Plan Engineering Ventures 10/04/2022 C500 Site Details Engineering Ventures 10/04/2022 C501 Stormwater Details and Earthwork Notes Engineering Ventures 10/04/2022 #SP-22-045 C502 Erosion Protection and Sediment Control Details Engineering Ventures 10/04/2022 L100 Proposed Planting Plan Engineering Ventures 10/04/2022 SD-1 Presentation First Floor Plan Engineering Ventures 10/04/2022 SD-2 Presentation Second Floor Plan Engineering Ventures 10/04/2022 SD-3 Proposed North and East Elevations Engineering Ventures 10/04/2022 SD-4 Proposed West and South Elevations Engineering Ventures 10/04/2022 SD-5 View from Green Mountain Drive Engineering Ventures 10/04/2022 SD-6 View from Shelburne Ave Engineering Ventures 10/04/2022 SD-7 Building Sections 1 & 2 Engineering Ventures 10/04/2022 ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Commercial 2 Zoning District Required Proposed Min. Lot Size 40,000 sf 90, 170 Max. Building Coverage 40% 15.37% Max. Overall Coverage 70% 66.75% Min. Front Setback (Urban Design Overlay District) 20 ft. 47.6 ft. Max Front Setback Coverage 30% 21.9% Min. Side Setback 10 ft. 63.9 ft. (no change) Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. N/A (corner lot)  Building Height (flat roof) 35 ft. 24.5 ft.  Meets requirement Commercial 2 Zoning District (C2) The purpose of the Commercial 2 Zoning District is to encourage general commercial activity. In addition to uses permitted in the C1 District, large lot-retail uses, such as sale of motor vehicles and building materials, may be permitted. A range of industrial uses as well as clustered residential development may be permitted in locations that are mutually compatible with general commercial activity. 10.01 Traffic Overlay District This property is located in Traffic Overlay District Zone 3 which allows 45 trips per 40,000 sf of land area without provision of additional mitigation measures. The trip budget is increased by 15% for properties where a raised median prevents left turns in or out. The trip budget for the 90,170 sf lot is therefore 117 trips per PM peak hour. The applicant estimates the proposed expansion will generate an additional 9 trips per PM peak hour, bring the total trips for the property from the existing 25 per PM peak hour to a 34 trips per PM peak hour. This figure is below the allowed trips for the property. As such, no additional study or mitigation measures are required. 10.05D Urban Design Overlay District Standards #SP-22-045 This project lies within the Secondary Node designation of the Urban Design Overlay District. If less than 50% of the façade is proposed to be altered, the applicant must comply with the Urban Design Overlay Standards for only the altered portion of the façade. This applies to the northern façade. The entirety of the Urban Design Overlay District Standards applies to building facades which are proposed to be altered by more than 50%. Based on the provided elevations, more than 50% of the western façade is proposed to be altered. (1) Entries. Buildings on subject properties must have at least one entry facing the primary road in the corridor. Any entry shall: (a) Be an operable entrance, as defined in these regulations. The proposed entrance facing the primary road is proposed to be usable and open for entry and exit. The Board finds this criterion met. (b) Serve, architecturally, as principal entry. Front entries shall be a focal point of the front façade and shall be an easily recognizable feature of the building. Possibilities include accenting front entries with features such as awnings, porticos, overhangs, recesses/projections, decorative front doors and side lights, or emphasis through varied color or special materials. This requirement does not preclude additional principal entry doors. The proposed entrance facing the primary road is directly accessible by a stair-stepped sidewalk connection to the sidewalk along the primary road. The sidewalk connection leads only to the proposed entrance, and the proposed entrance is accented by a polished aluminum awning and emphasized by a distinctive orange stripe on the façade. As such, the Board finds considers this criterion met. (c) Shall have a direct, separate walkway to the primary road. This walkway shall be at least eight (8) feet in width and may meander for design purposes, but must serve as a pedestrian-oriented access. The proposed entrance has an 8.5-foot wide direct, separate walkway connection to the sidewalk along the primary road that includes two sets of stairs with railings. As such, the Board finds this criterion met. (2) Glazing. Windows are key to the overall design of a building and the relationship between its exterior and interior. (a) For all properties in the Urban Overlay District, a minimum of 75% glazing shall be transparent. 100% of the proposed glazing is transparent. As such, the Board finds this criterion met. (b) In non-residential units, first story glazing shall have a minimum height of 7 vertical feet The first story glazing is proposed to be 10 feet high. As such, the Board finds this criterion met. (c) For residential uses, first story glazing shall have a minimum height of 5 vertical feet. This criterion is not applicable. (3) Dimensional Standards. #SP-22-045 Within a Designated Secondary Node, first stories must have a minimum of 60% glazing across the width of the primary building façade, and a minimum of 40% glazing across the width of the secondary building façade. The building must have the appearance of two stories, the corner of the corner building must have a significant architectural feature, and the building must be set back a minimum of 20 feet from the R.O.W. The proposed primary façade is approximately 65.0% glazed and the modified portion of the proposed secondary façade is approximately 51.9% glazed. The building is 26 feet high. Both the northern and western facades feature a 20-foot-tall window with views of the one-story showroom, although these windows are divided by a two-foot-wide aluminum strip running along the windows at an elevation of ten feet. The Board finds that this façade achieves the appearance of two stories, as the upper story windows are eight feet tall. The corner of the building closest to the intersection of the primary and secondary streets includes both the primary and secondary entrances to the structure, the terminus of the primary access walkway, and a distinctive orange stripe along the façade. The building is set back 47.6 feet from the R.O.W. at its closest point, along the principal street, and is set back a minimum of 63.9 feet from the R.O.W. along the secondary street. The Board finds urban design dimensional criteria met. (4) Building Stores, Heights & Rooftop Apparatus (a) Minimum stores of buildings within the Urban Design Overlay District are defined as per Article 2-Definitions and Section 8.06(F)(1) of these regulations. Minimum stories are discussed above. (b) Section 8.06(G) of these regulations shall apply to rooftop elements of buildings within the Urban Design Overlay District. Rooftop mechanical equipment and appurtenances are required to be arranged so as to minimize visibility from any point at or below the roof level of the subject structure. Such features in excess of one foot in height must be enclosed by outer building walls or parapets, grouped and screened, or themselves designed so that they are balanced or integrated with respect to the design and materials of the building. The applicant has not yet selected building mechanical equipment but has testified that all such rooftop elements will be located on the existing roof of the showroom, approximately six feet below the top of the proposed parapet. The applicant further testified that if the selected rooftop equipment is visible at or below roof level, the equipment will be screened in accordance with this criterion. These assurances are included as a stipulation of approval for this application. Where flat roofs are used, architectural elements such as cornices shall be included along all primary and secondary building facades. The applicant is proposing to include a six-inch cornice cap with two-inch relief at the top of the proposed parapet wall. A rooftop may be used for any use permitted for the building. Enclosed or partially enclosed building features are permitted and shall not be considered as an additional story, subject to conditions. #SP-22-045 No uses are proposed for the rooftop of this building. This criterion is not applicable. Utility features such as generators, gas lines or meters, or electric meters may not be located on any façade parallel to and adjacent to a street and must be screened from view of any such street. Gas and electric features are on the south side of the building. The Board finds no additional screening to be required and considers this element of 8.06G is met. (5) Landscaping. Projects within the Urban Design Overlay District shall meet minimum landscaping requirements as per Section 13.04 of these regulations. Projects are also subject to the following supplemental standards: (a) Landscaping which is required elsewhere in these Regulations to serve as a buffer between properties shall not count towards the minimum landscaping budget. No buffering is required. This criterion is not applicable. (b) For lots with buildings which are set back 50 or more feet from the front lot line, at least 50 % of the required landscaping shall be installed between the front building line and the front lot line. This property is situated on a corner lot and therefore has two front yards, one facing the primary street and one facing the secondary street. The structure is set back approximately 47.6 feet from the principal street front lot line and 63.9 feet from the secondary street front lot line. The front yard along the principal street, Shelburne Road, is presently well landscaped. The front yard along the secondary street, Green Mountain Drive, has fewer landscaping elements and is not in compliance with the above criterion. The applicant is proposing to put a portion of the additional landscaping to be installed as part of this application along the front yard abutting Green Mountain Drive, including the addition of ten shrubs and two shade trees in order to reduce the existing non-conformity. 1. In conjunction with Staff Comment 2 below regarding Landscape Budget Minimums, Staff considers that every effort should be made by the applicant to come into compliance with this criterion and that the addition of three more shade trees would sufficiently increase the subject property’s level of compliance with the above criterion. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS 14.06 General Review Standards A. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site. (1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Transitions from structure to site are considered by the Board to be adequate. Adequacy of planting and pedestrian movement are discussed elsewhere in this document. The Board finds the quantity of parking areas to be adequate. (2) Parking: #SP-22-045 (a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Any side of a building facing a public street shall be considered a front side of a building for the purposes of this subsection. No modifications to the existing non-conforming parking to the north are proposed. Parking on the south side of the building is being reconfigured. The proposed parking configuration meets the standard. As such, the Board considers this criterion met. (3) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or anticipated adjoining buildings. The footprint of the building is proposed to increase by approximately 36% and is proposed to be 24.5 feet tall and one story. The other buildings within this Designated Secondary Node along with the proposed structure are of a similar height, a slightly larger footprint, and a similar use. The Board finds the scale and height of the proposed structure to be compatible with the neighboring structures. B. Relationship of Structures and Site to Adjoining Area. (1) The Development Review Board shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics (e.g., rhythm, color, texture, form or detailing), landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The proposed materials and design of the building are relatively similar to the existing materials and design used by the adjacent credit union to the south. The existing parking area for the Jeep dealership is between these buildings and serves as a visual interruption between them. As such, the Board finds this criterion met. (2) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The proposed structures will be constructed in a very similar style and with many of the same materials. The vicinity is otherwise rather non-descript and has no elements that appear to clash with the proposed structure. The Board finds this criterion met. (3) To accomplish (1) and (2), the DRB shall consider: (a) Pattern and Rhythm. Update or maintain or extend the overall pattern of development defined by the planned or existing street grid, block configurations, position and orientation of principal buildings, prevalence of attached or detached building types. The Board finds the proposed addition to improve compliance with the smaller setbacks of the Urban Design Overlay District. (b) Architectural Features. Respond to recurring or representative architectural features that define neighborhood character, without adhering to a particular architectural style. The Board finds the proposed addition to meet the general features the neighborhood character without adhering to a particular style of construction. (c) Privacy. Limit impacts and intrusions to privacy on adjoining properties, including side and back yard areas through context sensitive design. #SP-22-045 No changes to privacy of adjoining properties are proposed. C. Site Amenity Requirement This non-residential expansion adds fewer than 5,000 square feet to the building area. As such, this criterion is not applicable. 14.07 Specific Review Standards In all Zoning Districts and the City Center Form Based Codes District, the following standards shall apply: A. Environmental Protection Standards. All proposed development shall be subject to the applicable requirements of Article 12, Environmental Protection Standards. There are no recorded wetlands, wetland buffers, habitat blocks, or river corridors on the site. This criterion is not applicable. B. Site Design Features. All proposed development shall comply with standards for the placement of buildings, parking and loading areas, landscaping and screening, open space, stormwater, lighting, and other applicable standards related to site design pursuant to these Land Development Regulations. These standards are contained in Article 13 and are discussed below. C. Access and Circulation. All proposed development shall comply with site access and circulation standards of Section 15.A.14. The proposed changes to site access and circulation include the addition of a pedestrian walkway linking the storefront to the sidewalk along the principal street and the addition of four short- term bicycle parking spaces. These changes do not affect vehicle circulation, are in compliance with the existing standards, and serve to improve pedestrian access. The Board finds this criterion met. D. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) [reserved] E. Building Form. Development within the City Center Form Based Code District, the Urban Design Overlay District, and other districts with supplemental building form standards shall adhere to the standards contained therein. See discussion of urban design overlay standards under dimensional standards above. F. Streetscape Improvements. A proposed new construction or extension/expansion of an existing structure exceeding the thresholds listed in either (a) Section 14.09(B) or (b) Section 8.11(D) within the City Center Form Based Code, or Section 3.11(D) in all other zoning districts, shall be required to upgrade adjacent sidewalks, greenbelts, and related street furniture (trees, benches, etc.) to the standards contained within the applicable Street Type and Building Envelope Standard. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to limit requirements for additional upgrades as necessary to meet the requirements of these Regulations. The Boards finds no upgrades to be required. G. Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts #SP-22-045 onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. See 13.02F below for discussion of access. H. Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire-served utility lines and service connections shall be underground insofar as feasible and subject to state public utilities regulations. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Standards of Section 15.A.18, Infrastructure, Utilities, and Services, shall also be met. The South Burlington Director of Public Works reviewed the plans on 9/6/2022 and offers the following comments: Work in the Route 7 ROW will require an 1111 permit from VTrans. If City owned utilities are impacted the applicant will also need a ROW permit from the Department of Public Works. The Boards requires the applicant to comply with the comments of the Director of Public Works as a condition of approval. I. Disposal of Wastes. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling, composting, or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). Small receptacles intended for use by households or the public (ie, non-dumpster, non-large drum) shall not be required to be fenced or screened. There are no proposed changes to the location or screening of the existing dumpster, which meets this criterion. SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS 13.02 Off Street Parking and Loading F. Access management Requirements. It is the intent of the City to minimize traffic and pedestrian conflicts caused by vehicular driveways on public roadways by reducing the number of required driveways and by minimizing the number of vehicles utilizing such driveways off public roadways. All applicants must make an effort to reduce these impacts. All commercial lots (retail, restaurant, office, service uses, excluding residential, agricultural and industrial uses) located adjacent to other commercial lots must provide a driveway connection to any adjacent commercial lot. If the adjacent property owner does not want to provide for that connection, the applicant must provide an easement to do so in the future when circumstances may change. This driveway connection or easement should be located where vehicular and pedestrian circulation is most feasible. LDR 13.02F requires all commercial lots located adjacent to other commercial lots to provide a driveway connection to any adjacent commercial lot. It goes on to state that if the adjacent property owner does not want to provide for that connection, the applicant must provide an easement to do so in the future when circumstances may change. This driveway connection or easement should be located where the vehicular and pedestrian circulation is most feasible. An access easement is proposed between the subject property and the adjacent property to the south. #SP-22-045 This criterion is not met with regards to the property to the east. However, the Boards finds that the existing topography precludes creation of a cross-lot connection and therefore exercises its limited waiver authority to waive this requirement. G. Design requirements for Parking Spaces, Parking Aisles, Lighting and Landscaping (1) Design requirements for off-street parking and loading are provided in Table 13-2 and Figure 13-1, Section 13.04, Landscaping , Screening, and Street Trees, and Section 13.07, Exterior Lighting. All paved parking spaces shall be striped or otherwise physically delimited. The South Burlington Deputy Director of Capital Projects reviewed the plans on 8/31/2022 and offers the following comments: If the unstriped parking areas located to the south and east of the proposed service area are for Goss cars for sale, and not for public parking, then the property has sufficient accessible parking spaces. If the spaces in question are for the public, an additional accessible parking space will be required. The Board acknowledges that the ADA is a separate regulatory body and recommends that the applicant take the above comment under advisement, while confirming their compliance with ADA's regulations with ADA directly. Parking lot landscaping is discussed under 13.04 below. (2) The location of parking areas and loading docks shall prevent conflicts with entering and existing traffic onto a public street and prevent conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians. The distance between access points and parking areas shall be adequate to minimize blockage and prevent back-ups onto the public street. The applicant is proposing to construct a service area with 4 garage bays on the south side of the building. The Board finds this configuration does not create conflicts with traffic and considers this criterion met. (3) Provision shall be made for access by police, fire and emergency vehicles. Staff considers no changes affecting emergency access are proposed. (4) Pedestrian safety. Insofar as practicable, pedestrian and bicycle circulation shall be separated from motor vehicle circulation. Safe and convenient pedestrian circulation, including appropriate sidewalks, shall be provided on the site and its approaches. The pedestrian circulation on site shall be designed to minimize adverse effects of vehicular traffic on sidewalks and recreation paths. The proposed primary entrance faces the primary road and is directly accessible via an 8.5-foot wide direct, separate walkway connection to the sidewalk along the primary road that includes two sets of stairs with railings The sidewalk connection leads to the proposed entrance and continues towards the north side of the building, where there are two entrances facing the secondary street and four bicycle parking spaces. Given this, the Board finds this criterion met. (5) Bicycle parking or storage facility. Bicycle parking is discussed under 13.03 below. #SP-22-045 (6) Stormwater management strategies that facilitate infiltration including but not limited to recessed planting islands, bioretention facilities, and pervious parking spaces are encouraged in the design of any off-street parking or loading area. Stormwater management is discussed under 13.05 below. 13.03 Bicycle Parking and Storage. The applicant has proposed to install two “inverted-U” bicycle racks, creating four short-term bicycle parking spaces. These bike racks meet the requirement for minimum bicycle parking spaces for this property and are proposed to be located in an area that is both easily accessible by pedestrians and protected from vehicle traffic. Long-term bicycle parking requirements do not apply. As such, the Board finds this criterion met. 13.04 Landscaping, Screening & Street Trees B. Except for parking spaces accessory to a one-family or two-family dwelling, all off-street parking areas subject to review by the Development Review Board shall be curbed and landscaped with appropriate trees, shrubs, and other plants including ground covers, as approved by the Development Review Board. Sections of recessed curb are permitted if their purpose is to allow stormwater runoff from the adjacent parking area to reach stormwater collection, treatment and management infrastructure. The Development Review Board shall consider the adequacy of the proposed landscaping to assure the establishment of a safe, convenient, and attractive parking area and the privacy and comfort of abutting properties. The applicant is proposing to reconfigure parking to the south of the building, including striping previously unmarked spaces and removing existing parking spaces. The proposed changes bring the existing nonconformities within the parking area closer to compliance. As such, the Board finds the parking area as proposed to adequately meet the relevant criteria. (1) All off-street parking areas shall be landscaped around the perimeter of the lot with trees, shrubs and other plants. Perimeter planting shall be set back from the curb sufficiently to allow for snow storage. The purpose of perimeter planting shall be to mitigate the view of the parking lot from the public way and from adjacent uses and properties, and to provide shade and canopy for the parking lot. In some situations it may be necessary, both for surveillance purposes and for the perception of safety, to install the size and type of plants that leave visual access between the parking lot to the public way or other pedestrian areas. The existing parking areas are to the north, east, and south of the principal structure and are not proposed to expand. The existing landscaping includes a variety of landscaping features around the perimeter of the parking areas. Furthermore, the applicant is proposing to install two shade trees along the east property line along the existing parking area. As such, the Board finds this criterion to be met. (2) In all parking areas containing twenty-eight (28) or more contiguous parking spaces and/or in parking lots with more than a single circulation lane, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of the parking lot shall be landscaped islands planted with trees, shrubs and other plants. Such requirement shall not apply to structured parking or below-ground parking. #SP-22-045 The parking lot is designed in such a way that this criterion does not apply. Modifications to the parking area consist only of removal of existing parking spaces and include the addition of a large interior landscape island. As such, the Board finds compliance with this criterion to have been improved to the extent necessary. (3) All interior and perimeter planting shall be protected by curbing unless specifically designed as a collection and treatment area for management of stormwater runoff as per 13.04(B)(5)(c) below. Interior planted islands shall have a minimum dimension of six (6) feet on any one side, and shall have a minimum square footage of sixty (60) square feet. Large islands are encouraged. There are no proposed planted islands as part of this project. As such, this criterion does not apply. (4) Landscaping Requirements (a) Landscaping shall include a variety of trees, shrubs, grasses and ground covers. All planting shall be species hardy for the region and, if located in areas receiving road runoff or salt spray, shall be salt-tolerant. The South Burlington City Arborist reviewed the plans on 9/12/2022 and offers the following comments: 1. A Tree Protection Plan should be included detailing measures to ensure protection of the existing trees they are retaining. 2. I’m not entirely familiar with the varieties selected, but I’d be hesitant to use broad leaved evergreens (Mt Laurel and Japanese Holly) on a western exposure. They will be susceptible to winter drying/damage. The Board requires the applicant to comply with the comments of the City Arborist as a condition of approval. (b) At least one (1) major deciduous shade tree shall be provided within or near the perimeter of each parking area, for every five (5) parking spaces. The trees shall be placed evenly throughout the parking lot to provide shade and reduce glare. Trees shall be placed a minimum of thirty (30) feet apart. This criterion is not met. Noncompliance with this criterion is reduced by reducing the number of parking spaces. (c) Trees shall have a caliper equal to or greater than two and one-half (2 ½) inches when measured on the tree stem, six (6) inches above the root ball. Proposed tree sizes are provided in calipers, and all provided calipers are greater than or equal to the minimum. As such, this criterion has been met. (d) Where more than ten (10) trees are installed, a mix of species is encouraged; the species should be grouped or located in a manner that reinforces the design and layout of the parking lot and the site. Fewer than 10 trees are proposed. (e) Within the City Center FBC District, landscaping required within this section shall not count towards meeting minimum landscape budget requirements as detailed in Section 13.04(G). #SP-22-045 This property is not located within the City Center FBC District and therefore this criterion does not apply. (7) Snow storage areas must be specified and located in an area that minimizes the potential for erosion and contaminated runoff into any adjacent or nearby surface waters. The proposed snow storage area is located in the southeast corner of the existing parking lot. Snow storage eliminates some display vehicle spaces but does not impact customer parking. The Board finds this criterion met. C. Screening or buffering. The Development Review Board will require landscaping, fencing, land shaping and/or screening along property boundaries (lot lines) whenever it determines that a) two adjacent sites are dissimilar and should be screened or buffered from each other, or b) a property’s appearance should be improved, which property is covered excessively with pavement or structures or is otherwise insufficiently landscaped, or c) a commercial, industrial, and multi-family use abuts a residential district or institutional use, or (d) a parking or loading area is adjacent to or visible from a public street. The Board finds that the proposed site is not dissimilar enough from the adjoining properties to require additional screening beyond that required in B(1) above. D. Front Yards of Non-Residential and Multi-Family Uses. In the case of non-residential and multi- family uses, the required front yard and/or the frontage along designated arterial and collector streets (see Article 3, Section 3.06 for this list) shall be suitably landscaped and maintained in good appearance. Landscape elements that reduce stormwater runoff and promote stormwater infiltration are encouraged. The Development Review Board shall require the applicant to meet the provisions of sections 13.04(F) and (G). The Board finds compliance with this criterion is met by the applicant’s proposed landscaping plan. G(3) Landscaping Budget Requirements. The Development Review Board shall require minimum planting costs for all site plans, as shown in Table 13-4 below. In evaluating landscaping requirements, some credit may be granted for existing trees or for site improvements other than tree planting as long as the objectives of this section are not reduced. The costs below are cumulative; for example, a landscaping budget shall be required to show a planned expenditure of three percent of the first $250,000 in construction or improvement cost plus two percent of the next $250,000 in construction or improvement cost, plus one percent of the remaining cost over $500,000. The landscaping budget shall be prepared by a landscape architect or professional landscape designer. The cost of the proposed building addition is $2,200,000, requiring $29,500 in plantings. The applicant has proposed 2 shade trees, 46 deciduous and evergreen shrubs, five distinct areas to be planted with perennials and ornamental grasses (including an area in and around the stormwater treatment area), and one stone vehicle display. The applicant has also proposed to relocate ten existing shrubs and is not seeking credit towards their landscaping budget for this relocation. The applicant has proposed the following elements be counted towards the required minimum landscaping budget: Item Cost Trees and Shrubs $8,964.00 Perennials & Ornamental Grasses $13,140.00 Natural Stone Vehicle Display $7,500.00 Total $29,604.00 #SP-22-045 Minimum Requirement $29,500.00 2. Staff notes the existing stone vehicle display effectively functions as outdoor display of merchandise and considers it to be inappropriate to allow it to count for 25% of the required minimum landscaping budget. Instead, Staff recommends the Board could consider landscaping in front of a stone vehicle display area, or provide additional landscaping in the form of trees along Green Mountain Drive instead. The Board may approve hardscaping as a landscaping budget item if the Board finds that the site is sufficiently landscaped and cannot accommodate the installation of additional shrubs and trees, which Staff does not believe to be the case here. Staff notes that increasing the number of trees installed along Green Mountain Drive, and eliminating the additional proposed stone vehicle display, could both meet the landscaping budget requirement and serve to comply with section 10.05.D.(5.b) of the Land Development Regulations. 13.05 Stormwater Management Stormwater standards apply when one-half acre or more of impervious surface exists or is proposed to exist, and where 5,000 sf of impervious is created or reconstructed. The City Stormwater Section reviewed the proposed plans on 9/12/2022 and offers the following comments. 1. This project is located in the Bartlett Brook watershed. This watershed is listed as stormwater impaired by the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). 2. It appears that the infiltration test was conducted in a separate location from where the infiltration system is being proposed. The infiltration system is located between soil boring B-2 and I-1. While the soil conditions at I-1 look favorable for infiltration, it is less clear if soils near soil boring B-2 would meet the infiltration requirements. The applicant should conduct a soil boring in the location where the infiltration practice is proposed. 3. Soil materials should be specified for the berm along the downhill side of the infiltration basin to ensure there is no seepage through the berm. 4. Include anti-seep collars on the outlet pipes from the infiltration basin. 5. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to regularly maintain all stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure The applicant has provided a letter from the geotechnical engineer confirming that infiltration testing has been completed and that the soils are consistent across the site, including the results of soil borings to corroborate that assertion and has updated the plan details to address the comments of the City Stormwater Section. 13.07 Exterior Lighting Lighting requirements are summarized as follows. (1) Fixtures must be downcast and shielded (2) Illumination must be evenly distributed (3) Fixtures must be placed to minimize lighting from becoming a nuisance (4) Poles shall be rustproof metal, cast iron, fiberglass, finished wood or similar structural material, with a decorative surface or finish (5) Poles & building mounted fixtures may be no higher than 30-ft #SP-22-045 (6) Poles must be located in safe locations Specific requirements for maximum illumination levels are included in Appendix A and are limited to 3- foot candles average at ground level. The applicant has indicated no changes to existing exterior lighting are proposed, and that existing fixtures are downcast and shielded. The applicant has confirmed that no building-mounted lighting is proposed. DECISION Motion by __, seconded by __, to approve Site Plan application #SP-22-045 of SRTB Holdings, LLC, subject to the following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations shall remain in full effect except as amended herein. 2. This project shall be completed as shown on the plan submitted by the applicant and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning as conditioned herein. 3. The plans must be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Administrative Officer. a. The soil materials must be specified for the berm along the downhill side of the infiltration basin to ensure there is no seepage through the berm. b. Anti-seep collars on the outlet pipes from the infiltration basin must be included. c. Address the comments of the City Arborist, subject to review and approval of the City Arborist 4. A digital PDF version of the approved final plan set must be delivered to the Administrative Officer before issuance of a zoning permit. 5. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant must post a landscaping surety for $29,604 in plantings in accordance with the methodology in LDR 15.15B. This bond shall remain in full effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of survival. 6. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant must demonstrate that all proposed rooftop equipment and machinery is located and/or screened in such a way that it is not visible at or below roof level. 7. Temporary structures used in conjunction with construction work shall be permitted only during the period that the construction is in progress. 8. The applicant must demonstrate compliance with the comments of the Director of Public Works prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 9. The applicant must regularly maintain all stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure. 10. All exterior lighting must be installed or shielded in such a manner as to conceal light sources and reflector surfaces from view beyond the perimeter of the area to be illuminated. 11. The applicant must obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months from the date of this decision or this approval expires and is null and void. The applicant may submit a request for an extension to obtain a zoning permit under the terms outlined in Section 17.04 of the LDRs, but the request must be submitted prior to the expiration of this approval. #SP-22-045 12. The applicant must continue to maintain the approved landscaping in a vigorous growing condition throughout the duration of the use. 13. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications must be underground. 14. The proposed project must adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan must meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. 15. The applicant must obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the proposed expansion. 16. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board or the Administrative Officer as allowed by the Land Development Regulations. 17. Bicycle racks must meet the minimum requirements of 13.14 and Appendix G. Dan Albrecht Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Mark Behr Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Frank Kochman Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Quinn Mann Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Dawn Philibert Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Stephanie Wyman Yea Nay Abstain Not Present John Stern Yea Nay Abstain Not Present Motion carried by a vote of 0 - 0 - 0. Signed this ____ day of October, 2022, by _____________________________________ Dawn Philibert, Chair Please note: An appeal of this decision may be taken by filing, within 30 days of the date of this decision, a notice of appeal and the required fee by certified mail to the Superior Court, Environmental Division. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b). A copy of the notice of appeal must also be mailed to the City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department at 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b) (4)(A). Please contact the Environmental Division at 802-828-1660 or http://vermontjudiciary.org/GTC/environmental/default.aspx for more information on filing requirements, deadlines, fees and mailing address. The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call 802.477.2241 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 208 Flynn Avenue, Suite 2A, Burlington, VT 05401  Tel: 802-863-6225 85 Mechanic Street, Suite E2-3, Lebanon, NH 03766  Tel: 603-442-9333 414 Union Street, Schenectady, NY 12305  Tel: 518-205-9141 ENGINEERING VENTURES, PC 414 Union Street, Schenectady, NY 12305  Tel: 518-205-9141 October 4, 2022 Marla Keene, PE Development Review Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 mkeene@southburlingtonvt.gov Re: Goss Jeep Renovation & Addition, Revision 1 1650 Shelburne Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 EV Project No. 20001 Marla, On behalf of our client, Goss Jeep, please find attached the following items for the above referenced project: · Revised project drawings dated October 4, 2022. The project drawings have been revised to address written comments received from your office on September 14, 2022 and verbal comments received from the Design Review Board at the September 20, 2022 meeting. We offer the following responses (provided in bold italics) for the comments received: Numbered Comments 1. Staff considers that trip generation is based on square footage, which is proposed to increase by over 35%. Staff recommends the Board ask the applicant to revise their calculations regarding their trip budget. (Section 10.01) The project trip generation budget has been revised to include 34 trips for the PM peak hour. The calculated trips are based on the ITE trip generation manual, 11th edition, and are shown below: Land Use Code: 840 Automobile Sales (new sales) Per 1000 SF: 2.42 vehicles per 1000 SF (40% entering/60% exiting) Existing building with additions = 13,860 SF / 1,000 x 2.42 = 34 trips ENGINEERING VENTURES, PC 414 Union Street, Schenectady, NY 12305  Tel: 518-205-9141 The calculated trips fall below the allowed trips for the parcel; therefore, no additional study or mitigation measures are required. 2. The proposed glazing includes both a high-polished aluminum storefront framing material and a low-emissivity, clear-anodized storefront framing material. No statement is made as to the transparency of either material. Staff recommends the Board ask the applicant to describe whether the proposed glazing is transparent. (Section 10.05D(2)a) The low-emissivity, clear-anodized storefront framing material (identified as GL-1 on the architectural plans) is a transparent glass. 3. Glazing is proposed to be 10 feet high. Staff considers this criterion met. However, compliance with this this criterion may be modified when issues with 10.05D(3) are addressed, therefore Staff recommends the Board revisit compliance with this criterion at a later time. (Section 10.05D(2)b) The building facade has been revised to accommodate comments made by staff and the board under Section 10.05D(3). The facade revisions do not impact the height of the first-floor glazing, which remains unchanged at 10 feet high. 4. The building is 26 feet high. Both the northern and western facades feature an 18-foot-tall window with views of the one-story showroom, although these windows are divided by a two- foot-wide aluminum strip running along the windows at an elevation of ten feet. Staff considers this facade does not quite achieve the appearance of two stories because upper story windows would not realistically start 1-ft from the floor. However, Staff considers a 4-ft wide divide, with the top of the upper portion moved two feet higher, may achieve the required appearance of two stories. Staff recommends the Board discuss whether this facade design has the appearance of two stories, whether Staff’s suggestion would address the issue, or whether some other solution should be considered. (Section 10.05D(3)) Based on input from the Board at the September 20, 2022 meeting, the facade of the showroom addition (north, south, and west elevations) has been revised to increase the overall window height from 18 feet to 20 feet. This will change the second story windows from 6 feet to 8 feet tall. The Overall building height will remain at 26 feet. Please see revised architectural drawings SD-3 through SD-7 for the revised building elevations, renderings and building sections. 5. Not used. 6. Insufficient information is provided to determine whether rooftop elements are proposed, and if so, whether this element of 8.06G is met. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to demonstrate compliance with this criterion prior to closing the hearing. (Section 10.05D(4)b) Building mechanical equipment has not been selected at this stage of the project but will be located on the existing roof of the showroom, which is approximately 6 feet below the top of ENGINEERING VENTURES, PC 414 Union Street, Schenectady, NY 12305  Tel: 518-205-9141 the new parapet. If the selected equipment is visible at or below the roof level of the existing building, the equipment will be screened to meet this criterion. 7. There are no cornices indicated on the elevations along either the primary or secondary building facades. As such, Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to demonstrate compliance with this criterion prior to closing the hearing (Section 10.05D(4)b) Based on input from the Board at the September 20, 2022 meeting, a cap will be included at the top of the new parapet wall of the showroom addition that will have a height of 6 inches and a reveal of 2 inches. Please see revised architectural drawings SD-3 through SD-7 for the revised building elevations, renderings and building sections. 8. The proposed materials and design of the building are relatively similar to the existing materials and design used by the adjacent credit union to the south. The existing parking area for the Jeep dealership is between the two incongruous buildings and serves as a visual interruption between these two structures. As such, staff considers this criterion met. (Section 14.06B(1)) Comment noted. 9. This criterion is not met with regards to the property to the east. Staff considers that existing topography precludes creation of a cross-lot connection and therefore recommends the Board not require a connection or easement to the east. (Section 13.02F) Comment noted. 10. Snow storage areas are not specified on the plans. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to specify snow storage areas prior to closing the hearing. (Section 13.04B(7)) The applicant utilizes the southeast corner of the existing parking lot (vehicle storage area) for snow storage. No public parking is impacted with snow storage. Please see drawing C102 – Site Layout Pan for the designated snow storage area. 11. The applicant is removing ten bushes of various sizes from the western side of the structure as part of the proposed alterations to the property. In addition to meeting the minimum landscaping value requirement, the applicant must also replace these plants. Furthermore, Staff considers the costs associated with lawn, turf, and mulch management on the property not to count towards the requirement of $29,500, leaving the applicant $17,693.50 short of meeting the minimum, plus the value of bushes to be removed. Staff recommends that the Board require the applicant to meet these criteria before the close of the meeting. (Section 13.04G(3)) The landscaping plan has been revised to include relocation or replacement of the 10 bushes to be removed on the western side of the existing showroom. These plantings are excluded from the landscaping budget. Lawn, turf, and mulch expenses have been removed from the required landscaping budget. Additional plantings and a stone wall vehicle display (identical to the existing onsite vehicle display) have been added to the plan to satisfy the landscaping ENGINEERING VENTURES, PC 414 Union Street, Schenectady, NY 12305  Tel: 518-205-9141 budget deficit. Please see the revised budget below. Also, please see drawings L100 – Landscaping Plan and C102 – Site Layout Plan for plan changes. Landscaping Budget Opinion of Construction Cost 12. Staff recommends the Board requires the applicant to address Comment #2 prior to closing the hearing and comply with all other comments as a condition of approval. (Section 13.05) Please see stormwater comment responses below. 13. Staff recommends the Board confirm with the applicant that no building-mounted lighting is Proposed. (Section 13.07) The project does not propose any relocated or new exterior building mounted lighting. Additional Comments Unnumbered Comment. The building is situated on a corner lot and therefore has two front yards, one facing the primary street and one facing the secondary street. The structure is set back approximately 47.6 feet from the principal street front lot line and 63.9 feet from the secondary street front lot line. The front yard along the principal street, Shelburne Road, is presently landscaped and is proposed for additional landscaping. The applicant is not proposing additional landscaping in the front yard along the secondary street, Green Mountain Drive, which exceeds a 50-foot setback. As such, Staff considers an appreciable portion of the required landscaping should be applied along front yard abutting Green Mountain Drive, in order to reduce the existing non-conformity. Staff recommends the Board discuss and provide specific direction to the applicant as to how to achieve compliance with this criterion. In addition, the applicant is proposing to remove previously required landscaping (discussed below), therefore additional landscaping budget beyond that currently proposed is required and available to address this deficiency. (Section 10.05D(5)) The landscaping plan has been revised to include two new trees and a planting area in the yard abutting Green Mountain Drive. This includes relocating the two proposed trees from the east property line to this area and the reestablishment of previously required landscaping which is not included in the landscaping budget. Please see drawing L100 for plan changes. ENGINEERING VENTURES, PC 414 Union Street, Schenectady, NY 12305  Tel: 518-205-9141 Unnumbered Comment. Work in the Route 7 ROW will require an 1111 permit from VTrans. If City owned utilities are impacted the applicant will also need a ROW permit from the Department of Public Works. (Section 14.07H) Comment Noted. Unnumbered Comment. If the unstriped parking areas located to the south and east of the proposed service area are for Goss cars for sale, and not for public parking, then the property has sufficient accessible parking spaces. If the spaces in question are for the public, an additional accessible parking space will be required. (Section 13.02G(1)) The unstriped parking areas on site are for vehicle inventory storage and not for public parking. 1. A Tree Protection Plan should be included detailing measures to ensure protection of the existing trees they are retaining. (Section 13.04B(4)a) Trees identified for protection during construction are shown on drawing C104 – Erosion Prevention & Sediment Control Plan. A tree protection detail is also included as Detail 4 on drawing C502 - Erosion Prevention & Sediment Control Details. 2. I’m not entirely familiar with the varieties selected, but I’d be hesitant to use broad leaved evergreens (Mt Laurel and Japanese Holly) on a western exposure. They will be susceptible to winter drying/damage. (Section 13.04B(4)a) The planting plan has been updated to replace Mountain Laurel with Red Sprite Winterberry and Japanese Holly with Hicksii Yew. Please see drawing L100 for plan changes. 1. This project is located in the Bartlett Brook watershed. This watershed is listed as stormwater impaired by the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). Comment Noted. 2. It appears that the infiltration test was conducted in a separate location from where the infiltration system is being proposed. The infiltration system is located between soil boring B-2 and I-1. While the soil conditions at I-1 look favorable for infiltration, it is less clear if soils near soil boring B-2 would meet the infiltration requirements. The applicant should conduct a soil boring in the location where the infiltration practice is proposed. The geotechnical engineer has issued an addendum to their original report indicating that the infiltration rate at the new infiltration basin location should have similar or better infiltration characteristics to soil boring I-1. Please see attached Addendum No. 1 to Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by Terracon Consultants-NY, Inc. dated October 3, 2022. ENGINEERING VENTURES, PC 414 Union Street, Schenectady, NY 12305  Tel: 518-205-9141 3. Soil materials should be specified for the berm along the downhill side of the infiltration basin to ensure there is no seepage through the berm. A soil specification has been added to the Site/Earthwork Specifications on drawing C501 for a soil embankment material to prevent seepage through the downhill side of the infiltration basin. See Detail 1 on Drawing C501 for additional information. 4. Include anti-seep collars on the outlet pipes from the infiltration basin. An anti-seep collar has been added to the infiltration basin outlet. See Detail 1 on Drawing C501. 5. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to regularly maintain all stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure. Comment Noted. We trust this submission is complete; however, if you have any additional questions or require any additional information to finalize the permit, please do not hesitate to contact us. Mike Dussault, PE Senior Engineer, Principal Cc: Brian Hoar & Jay Langford – Goss Jeep David Calcaterra – CBRE Brent Kosoc – BBL Construction Services Matt Tyler – Syvertsen Rigosu Architects Goss Jeep1650 Shelburne RoadSouth Burlington, VT 05403DRAWING LISTCONSULTANTS:OWNER/APPLICANT:SUBJECT PROPERTY:TAX MAPZONING MAPORTHO MAPDate:Scale:Drawn By:Checked By:Sheet Title: Project Title:StampEV Project #No.Description Date S:\PROJECTS\0-2020\20001 GOSS JEEP\DWG\SHEET FILES\20001 - C001 COVER SHEET.DWG PLOTTED: 10/4/2022 9:56 AM 208 Flynn Avenue, Suite 2A, Burlington, VT 05401 s 802-863-6225 85 Mechanic Street, Suite E2-3, Lebanon, NH 03766 s 603-442-9333 414 Union Street, Schenectady, NY 12305 s (518) 205-9141 www.engineeringventures.com20001Goss Jeep Renovation & Addition South Burlington, Chittenden, Vermont Goss Jeep 1650 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 652-5046 ENGINEERING VENTURESPCC001COVER SHEET MHDSDNA10/04/2022 SYMBOL LEGENDLINETYPE LEGEND>>>>>>XXXXFMFMUDFDUGTUDFDUGTOHTOHTWW(W)RDRD(ST)SS(S)Date:Scale:Drawn By:Checked By:Sheet Title: Project Title:StampEV Project #No.Description Date S:\PROJECTS\0-2020\20001 GOSS JEEP\DWG\SHEET FILES\20001 - C002 LEGEND & NOTES.DWG PLOTTED: 10/4/2022 8:25 AM 208 Flynn Avenue, Suite 2A, Burlington, VT 05401 s 802-863-6225 85 Mechanic Street, Suite E2-3, Lebanon, NH 03766 s 603-442-9333 414 Union Street, Schenectady, NY 12305 s (518) 205-9141 www.engineeringventures.com20001Goss Jeep Renovation & Addition South Burlington, Chittenden, Vermont Goss Jeep 1650 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 652-5046 ENGINEERING VENTURESPC GENERAL NOTESSURVEY NOTESSURVEY NOTESC002SITE LEGEND AND NOTES MHDSDNA10/04/2022 SHELBURNE ROAD (RT. 7)NORTH BOUNDSHELBURNE ROAD (RT. 7) SOUTH BOUNDGREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVEEwAVeBSOIL BOUNDARYDate:Scale:Drawn By:Checked By:Sheet Title: Project Title:StampEV Project #No.Description Date S:\PROJECTS\0-2020\20001 GOSS JEEP\DWG\SHEET FILES\20001 - C100 EXISTING CONDITIONS.DWG PLOTTED: 10/4/2022 8:29 AM 208 Flynn Avenue, Suite 2A, Burlington, VT 05401 s 802-863-6225 85 Mechanic Street, Suite E2-3, Lebanon, NH 03766 s 603-442-9333 414 Union Street, Schenectady, NY 12305 s (518) 205-9141 www.engineeringventures.com20001Goss Jeep Renovation & Addition South Burlington, Chittenden, Vermont Goss Jeep 1650 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 652-5046 ENGINEERING VENTURESPCEXISTING UTILITY NOTESC100EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN MHDMJD1" = 20'10/04/2022GEOTECHINCAL INVESTIGATIONSITE SOILS SHELBURNE ROAD (RT. 7)NORTH BOUNDSHELBURNE ROAD (RT. 7) SOUTH BOUNDGREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVEDate:Scale:Drawn By:Checked By:Sheet Title: Project Title:StampEV Project #No.Description Date S:\PROJECTS\0-2020\20001 GOSS JEEP\DWG\SHEET FILES\20001 - C101 DEMOLITION PLAN.DWG PLOTTED: 10/4/2022 8:33 AM 208 Flynn Avenue, Suite 2A, Burlington, VT 05401 s 802-863-6225 85 Mechanic Street, Suite E2-3, Lebanon, NH 03766 s 603-442-9333 414 Union Street, Schenectady, NY 12305 s (518) 205-9141 www.engineeringventures.com20001Goss Jeep Renovation & Addition South Burlington, Chittenden, Vermont Goss Jeep 1650 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 652-5046 ENGINEERING VENTURESPCC101DEMOLITION PLAN MHDMJD1" = 20'10/04/2022DEMOLITION ITEMSDEMOLITION NOTES SHELBURNE ROAD (RT. 7)NORTH BOUNDSHELBURNE ROAD (RT. 7) SOUTH BOUNDGREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVEDate:Scale:Drawn By:Checked By:Sheet Title: Project Title:StampEV Project #No.Description Date S:\PROJECTS\0-2020\20001 GOSS JEEP\DWG\SHEET FILES\20001 - C102 SITE PLAN.DWG PLOTTED: 10/4/2022 9:27 AM 208 Flynn Avenue, Suite 2A, Burlington, VT 05401 s 802-863-6225 85 Mechanic Street, Suite E2-3, Lebanon, NH 03766 s 603-442-9333 414 Union Street, Schenectady, NY 12305 s (518) 205-9141 www.engineeringventures.com20001Goss Jeep Renovation & Addition South Burlington, Chittenden, Vermont Goss Jeep 1650 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 652-5046 ENGINEERING VENTURESPCC102SITE LAYOUT PLAN MHDMJD1" = 20'10/04/2022SITE NOTESPROPOSED LEGENDZONING REQUIREMENTSPARKING ANALYSIS SHELBURNE ROAD (RT. 7)NORTH BOUNDSHELBURNE ROAD (RT. 7) SOUTH BOUNDGREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVEDate:Scale:Drawn By:Checked By:Sheet Title: Project Title:StampEV Project #No.Description Date S:\PROJECTS\0-2020\20001 GOSS JEEP\DWG\SHEET FILES\20001 - C103 GRADING & UTILITY PLAN.DWG PLOTTED: 10/4/2022 9:41 AM 208 Flynn Avenue, Suite 2A, Burlington, VT 05401 s 802-863-6225 85 Mechanic Street, Suite E2-3, Lebanon, NH 03766 s 603-442-9333 414 Union Street, Schenectady, NY 12305 s (518) 205-9141 www.engineeringventures.com20001Goss Jeep Renovation & Addition South Burlington, Chittenden, Vermont Goss Jeep 1650 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 652-5046 ENGINEERING VENTURESPCC103GRADING & UTILITY PLAN MHDMJD1" = 20'10/04/2022STORMWATER STRUCTURE SCHEDULESTORMWATER PIPE SCHEDULESANITARY SCHEDULENATURAL GAS SCHEDULE SHELBURNE ROAD (RT. 7)NORTH BOUNDSHELBURNE ROAD (RT. 7) SOUTH BOUNDGREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVEEwAVeBSOIL BOUNDARYEROSION CONTROL LEGENDDate:Scale:Drawn By:Checked By:Sheet Title: Project Title:StampEV Project #No.Description Date S:\PROJECTS\0-2020\20001 GOSS JEEP\DWG\SHEET FILES\20001 - C201 EPSC PLAN.DWG PLOTTED: 10/4/2022 9:52 AM 208 Flynn Avenue, Suite 2A, Burlington, VT 05401 s 802-863-6225 85 Mechanic Street, Suite E2-3, Lebanon, NH 03766 s 603-442-9333 414 Union Street, Schenectady, NY 12305 s (518) 205-9141 www.engineeringventures.com20001Goss Jeep Renovation & Addition South Burlington, Chittenden, Vermont Goss Jeep 1650 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 652-5046 ENGINEERING VENTURESPCC104EROSION PREVENTION & SEDIMENT CONTROL (EPSC) PLAN MHDMJD1" = 20'10/04/2022 STONE DRIP EDGE AT BUILDING DETAILBOULDER WALLPAVEMENT MARKING DETAILTYPICAL STAIR DETAILTYPICAL RISER & TREAD DETAILCONCRETE STAIR DETAILSIGN AND POST DETAILSBOLLARD DETAILCONCRETE WHEEL STOP DETAILTYPICAL PAVEMENT PATCH DETAILBIKE RACK DETAILCONCRETE SIDEWALK/PAD DETAILDate:Scale:Drawn By:Checked By:Sheet Title: Project Title:StampEV Project #No.Description Date S:\PROJECTS\0-2020\20001 GOSS JEEP\DWG\SHEET FILES\20001 - C500 DETAILS.DWG PLOTTED: 10/4/2022 9:01 AM 208 Flynn Avenue, Suite 2A, Burlington, VT 05401 s 802-863-6225 85 Mechanic Street, Suite E2-3, Lebanon, NH 03766 s 603-442-9333 414 Union Street, Schenectady, NY 12305 s (518) 205-9141 www.engineeringventures.com20001Goss Jeep Renovation & Addition South Burlington, Chittenden, Vermont Goss Jeep 1650 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 652-5046 ENGINEERING VENTURESPCC500SITE DETAILS MHDSDNA10/04/2022 TYPICAL STORM DRAIN TRENCH DETAILINSULATION OVER SHALLOW DRAIN DETAILSTORM DRAIN CLEANOUTSITE/EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONSSURFACE INFILTRATION BASINDRAINAGE MANHOLE DETAILFLARED END SECTION W/STONE APRONDate:Scale:Drawn By:Checked By:Sheet Title: Project Title:StampEV Project #No.Description Date S:\PROJECTS\0-2020\20001 GOSS JEEP\DWG\SHEET FILES\20001 - C500 DETAILS.DWG PLOTTED: 10/4/2022 9:04 AM 208 Flynn Avenue, Suite 2A, Burlington, VT 05401 s 802-863-6225 85 Mechanic Street, Suite E2-3, Lebanon, NH 03766 s 603-442-9333 414 Union Street, Schenectady, NY 12305 s (518) 205-9141 www.engineeringventures.com20001Goss Jeep Renovation & Addition South Burlington, Chittenden, Vermont Goss Jeep 1650 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 652-5046 ENGINEERING VENTURESPCC501STORMWATER DETAILS AND EARTHWORK NOTES MHDSDNA10/04/2022K.L.M.N. GENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTESTREE PROTECTION DETAILEROSION CONTROL BLANKETSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE DETAILCONCRETE WASHOUT DETAILSILT FENCE DETAILDate:Scale:Drawn By:Checked By:Sheet Title: Project Title:StampEV Project #No.Description Date S:\PROJECTS\0-2020\20001 GOSS JEEP\DWG\SHEET FILES\20001 - C500 DETAILS.DWG PLOTTED: 10/4/2022 9:05 AM 208 Flynn Avenue, Suite 2A, Burlington, VT 05401 s 802-863-6225 85 Mechanic Street, Suite E2-3, Lebanon, NH 03766 s 603-442-9333 414 Union Street, Schenectady, NY 12305 s (518) 205-9141 www.engineeringventures.com20001Goss Jeep Renovation & Addition South Burlington, Chittenden, Vermont Goss Jeep 1650 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 652-5046 ENGINEERING VENTURESPCC502EROSION PROTECTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DETAILS MHDSDNA10/04/2022 SHELBURNE ROAD (RT. 7)NORTH BOUNDSHELBURNE ROAD (RT. 7) SOUTH BOUNDGREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE2NSGG6HQM3TMH9HPLQF3TMH4IVRS3IVRS3IVRS3IVRS4TMH5HPLQF5HPDate:Scale:Drawn By:Checked By:Sheet Title: Project Title:StampEV Project #No.Description Date C:\J MILLER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE\JOBS\2022\2022.28.GOSS JEEP\0_CURRENT\2022.28.GOSS JEEP LANDSCAPE PLAN.REV1.DWG PLOTTED: 9/29/2022 9:58 AM 208 Flynn Avenue, Suite 2A, Burlington, VT 05401 s 802-863-6225 85 Mechanic Street, Suite E2-3, Lebanon, NH 03766 s 603-442-9333 414 Union Street, Schenectady, NY 12305 s (518) 205-9141 www.engineeringventures.com20001Goss Jeep Renovation & Addition South Burlington, Chittenden, Vermont Goss Jeep 1650 Shelburne Rd. South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 652-5046 ENGINEERING VENTURES PCL100PROPOSED PLANTING PLAN JPMJPM1" = 20'10/04/2022 DN 3725 SFShowroom 124 SFWomen's 134 SFMen's 482 SFLounge & Cafe 4432 SF Service Department 118 SF Serv. Mngr. 513 SF Parts 46 SFStairs 65 SFTech BR. 249 SFRetail 143 SFOffice 219 SFBreak Room 40 SFElec. 148 SF Sales Mngr. 111 SF Sales Mnger.14 SFCl. 84 SFGuest Entry 1461 SFService Drive Wagoneer Display & Cloud Above 6'-0"18'-3"6'-0"11'-8"6'-0"12'-4"6'-0"120'-11"3'-10"3'-4"53'-2"39'-0"35'-2"3'-4" 2'-6"2'-11"13'-4"3'-0"13'-4"6'-0"44'-5"15'-11"6'-5"45'-0"6'-0"11'-8"6'-0"187'-2" 66'-4"18'-11" 85'-3"41'-1"60'-10" 187'-2"99'-4"41'-0"39'-0"6'-3"6'-4" 3'-4" 5'-6"5'-6"5'-6" 4'-2" 4'-2" A A 1 1 4 4 3 3 2 2 B B C C UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT, 17 U.S.C. AS AMENDED DECEMBER 1, 1990, ALSO KNOWN AS THE "ARCHITECTURAL WORKSPROTECTION ACT OF 1990", THESE DOCUMENTS ARE COPYRIGHTED AND ARE SUBJECT TO COPYRIGHT PROTECTION AS AN"ARCHITECTURAL WORK". THE DESIGN, SPATIAL FORMS, IDEAS, COMPOSITIONS AND ARRANGEMENT OF ITEMS DELINEATEDIN THIS SET OF PLANS ARE PROPRIETARY OF SYVERTSEN RIGOSU ARCHITECTS, PLLC (SRA). UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESEPLANS CAN LEGALLY RESULT IN THE CESSATION OF SUCH CONSTRUCTION OR BUILDING BEING SEIZED AND RAZED. 2022 SYVERTSEN RIGOSU ARCHITECTS, PLLC (SRA)© 10.04.2022 Goss Jeep Renovation & Addition Goss Jeep SD-1 1/8" = 1'-0"1 Presentation First Floor Plan N 1176 SFParts Storage 61 SFFiles 221 SFConference 339 SF Parts Storage 77 SF Storage 199 SFEmployee Break 52 SFToilet 32 SF Data 112 SFOffice 74 SF Office 180 SF Manager;s Office 215 SF Circulation 66'-4"120'-11" 6'-0"18'-3"6'-0"11'-8"24'-4"23'-7"45'-0"6'-5"6'-0"44'-5"15'-11"30'-4"39'-0"7'-4"60'-4"39'-0"66'-4"18'-11"41'-1"60'-10"75'-1"187'-2" A A 1 1 4 4 3 3 2 2 B B C C UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT, 17 U.S.C. AS AMENDED DECEMBER 1, 1990, ALSO KNOWN AS THE "ARCHITECTURAL WORKSPROTECTION ACT OF 1990", THESE DOCUMENTS ARE COPYRIGHTED AND ARE SUBJECT TO COPYRIGHT PROTECTION AS AN"ARCHITECTURAL WORK". THE DESIGN, SPATIAL FORMS, IDEAS, COMPOSITIONS AND ARRANGEMENT OF ITEMS DELINEATEDIN THIS SET OF PLANS ARE PROPRIETARY OF SYVERTSEN RIGOSU ARCHITECTS, PLLC (SRA). UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESEPLANS CAN LEGALLY RESULT IN THE CESSATION OF SUCH CONSTRUCTION OR BUILDING BEING SEIZED AND RAZED. 2022 SYVERTSEN RIGOSU ARCHITECTS, PLLC (SRA)© 10.04.2022 Goss Jeep Renovation & Addition Goss Jeep SD-2 1/8" = 1'-0"1 2 - Second Floor - Presentation Plan N First Floor 0'-0" First Floor 0'-0" T.O. Existing Parapet 20'-0" T.O. Existing Parapet 20'-0" Second Floor 10'-0" Second Floor 10'-0" ACM-J1 ACM-J2 ACM-J3 GL-1 CW-1 EXP-J2 Sidewalk -8'-4" Sidewalk -8'-4" ACM-J3 10'-0"2'-0" 8'-0" GL-2 T.O. New Parapet 26'-0" T.O. New Parapet 26'-0" First Floor 0'-0" First Floor 0'-0" T.O. Existing Parapet 20'-0" T.O. Existing Parapet 20'-0" Second Floor 10'-0" Second Floor 10'-0" ACM-J3EXP-J2 ACM-J1 ACM-J2 ACM-J3 T.O. New Parapet 26'-0" T.O. New Parapet 26'-0" UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT, 17 U.S.C. AS AMENDED DECEMBER 1, 1990, ALSO KNOWN AS THE "ARCHITECTURAL WORKSPROTECTION ACT OF 1990", THESE DOCUMENTS ARE COPYRIGHTED AND ARE SUBJECT TO COPYRIGHT PROTECTION AS AN"ARCHITECTURAL WORK". THE DESIGN, SPATIAL FORMS, IDEAS, COMPOSITIONS AND ARRANGEMENT OF ITEMS DELINEATEDIN THIS SET OF PLANS ARE PROPRIETARY OF SYVERTSEN RIGOSU ARCHITECTS, PLLC (SRA). UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESEPLANS CAN LEGALLY RESULT IN THE CESSATION OF SUCH CONSTRUCTION OR BUILDING BEING SEIZED AND RAZED. 2022 SYVERTSEN RIGOSU ARCHITECTS, PLLC (SRA)© 10.04.2022 Goss Jeep Renovation & Addition Goss Jeep SD-3 1/8" = 1'-0"1 Proposed North Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"2 Proposed East Elevation Exterior Finish Schedule Keynote Number Material Manufacturer Pattern/Product Line Color/Finish Type/Size Remarks Sorting ACM-4 Brake Metal Alpolic -Color to match adjacent ACM .032 gage Brake Metal Parapet Cap 2' - 0" ACM-C1 Aluminum Composite Metal Panel Alpolic Stack Bond Silver Metalic (MTLC BSX SILVER)-Field Facade 3' - 0" ACM-C2 Aluminum Composite Metal Panel Alpolic -High Polished Aluminum (DM HPA SLVR) -Entry Arch Accent 3' - 0" ACM-J1 Aluminum Composite Metal Panel Alpolic Stack Bond Mica MRO Anthracite Gray (4MM)23" x 72" finish face (thickness: 4mm) Field Facade 1' - 0" ACM-J2 Aluminum Composite Metal Panel Alpolic Stack Bond Harvest Trail Bamboo (4 MM QCP) 8" x 48" finish face (thickness: 4mm) Accent Facade 1' - 0" ACM-J3 Aluminum Composite Metal Panel Alpolic -High Polished Aluminum (DM HPA)DM HPA (thickness: 3 mm) Trim 1' - 0" B-1 0' - 0" CW-1 Curtain Wall Framing Kawneer butt-jointed Clear Anodized -Showroom Exterrior Curtain Wall 3' - 6" EIFS-1 EIFS STO CORP -Medium Sand Oyster #21612 --0' - 0" EIFS-2 EIFS STO CORP -to Match ACM-J1 Anthracite --0' - 0" EXP-C1 Exterior Paint Benjamin Moore -1612 Pelican Gray Flat Exterior Field Paint 5' - 0" EXP-C2 Exterior Paint Benjamin Moore -1615 Rock Gray Flat Exterior Trim Paint 5' - 0" EXP-J1 Exterior Paint Sherwin Williams -SW 7067 Cityscape Satin Exterior Field Paint 4' - 0" EXP-J2 Exterior Paint Sherwin Williams -SW 6991 Black Magic Satin Exterior Accent Paint 4' - 0" GL-1 Storefront Framing Vitro Solarban Low E on Acuity, butt jointed Clear Anodized (thickness: 1" insulated) Entrance Exterior Storefront 3' - 6" GL-2 Storefront Framing Mapes Rabbet R+ butt jointed High Polished Aluminum (DM HPA)(thickness: 2" insulated spandrel) Entrance Exterior Storefront 3' - 6" GL-C2 Spandrel Glass Vitro Architectural Glass (aka PPG) or equivalent Insulating Glass System PPG Black --0' - 0" HSRD Rytec High Speed Roll Up Door Representative: Brady Bell 0' - 0" SF-1 Storefront Framing Kawneer TRIFAB 451 System -butt jointed Entrance Exterior Storefront 0' - 0" First Floor 0'-0" First Floor 0'-0" T.O. Existing Parapet 20'-0" T.O. Existing Parapet 20'-0" Second Floor 10'-0" Second Floor 10'-0" ACM-J1 ACM-J2 CW-1 ACM-J3 GL-1 EXP-J2 Sidewalk -8'-4" Sidewalk -8'-4" ACM-J3 8'-0"2'-0"10'-0"T.O. New Parapet 26'-0" T.O. New Parapet 26'-0" GL-2 First Floor 0'-0" First Floor 0'-0" T.O. Existing Parapet 20'-0" T.O. Existing Parapet 20'-0" Second Floor 10'-0" Second Floor 10'-0" CW-1 GL-1 ACM-J1 ACM-J2 ACM-J3 ACM-J3 Sidewalk -8'-4" Sidewalk -8'-4" ACM-J2 8'-0"2'-0"10'-0"ACM-J1 GL-2 T.O. New Parapet 26'-0" T.O. New Parapet 26'-0"8'-0"UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT, 17 U.S.C. AS AMENDED DECEMBER 1, 1990, ALSO KNOWN AS THE "ARCHITECTURAL WORKSPROTECTION ACT OF 1990", THESE DOCUMENTS ARE COPYRIGHTED AND ARE SUBJECT TO COPYRIGHT PROTECTION AS AN"ARCHITECTURAL WORK". THE DESIGN, SPATIAL FORMS, IDEAS, COMPOSITIONS AND ARRANGEMENT OF ITEMS DELINEATEDIN THIS SET OF PLANS ARE PROPRIETARY OF SYVERTSEN RIGOSU ARCHITECTS, PLLC (SRA). UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESEPLANS CAN LEGALLY RESULT IN THE CESSATION OF SUCH CONSTRUCTION OR BUILDING BEING SEIZED AND RAZED. 2022 SYVERTSEN RIGOSU ARCHITECTS, PLLC (SRA)© 10.04.2022 Goss Jeep Renovation & Addition Goss Jeep SD-4 1/8" = 1'-0"1 Proposed South Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"2 Proposed West Elevation Exterior Finish Schedule Keynote Number Material Manufacturer Pattern/Product Line Color/Finish Type/Size Remarks Sorting ACM-4 Brake Metal Alpolic -Color to match adjacent ACM .032 gage Brake Metal Parapet Cap 2' - 0" ACM-C1 Aluminum Composite Metal Panel Alpolic Stack Bond Silver Metalic (MTLC BSX SILVER)-Field Facade 3' - 0" ACM-C2 Aluminum Composite Metal Panel Alpolic -High Polished Aluminum (DM HPA SLVR) -Entry Arch Accent 3' - 0" ACM-J1 Aluminum Composite Metal Panel Alpolic Stack Bond Mica MRO Anthracite Gray (4MM)23" x 72" finish face (thickness: 4mm) Field Facade 1' - 0" ACM-J2 Aluminum Composite Metal Panel Alpolic Stack Bond Harvest Trail Bamboo (4 MM QCP) 8" x 48" finish face (thickness: 4mm) Accent Facade 1' - 0" ACM-J3 Aluminum Composite Metal Panel Alpolic -High Polished Aluminum (DM HPA)DM HPA (thickness: 3 mm) Trim 1' - 0" B-1 0' - 0" CW-1 Curtain Wall Framing Kawneer butt-jointed Clear Anodized -Showroom Exterrior Curtain Wall 3' - 6" EIFS-1 EIFS STO CORP -Medium Sand Oyster #21612 --0' - 0" EIFS-2 EIFS STO CORP -to Match ACM-J1 Anthracite --0' - 0" EXP-C1 Exterior Paint Benjamin Moore -1612 Pelican Gray Flat Exterior Field Paint 5' - 0" EXP-C2 Exterior Paint Benjamin Moore -1615 Rock Gray Flat Exterior Trim Paint 5' - 0" EXP-J1 Exterior Paint Sherwin Williams -SW 7067 Cityscape Satin Exterior Field Paint 4' - 0" EXP-J2 Exterior Paint Sherwin Williams -SW 6991 Black Magic Satin Exterior Accent Paint 4' - 0" GL-1 Storefront Framing Vitro Solarban Low E on Acuity, butt jointed Clear Anodized (thickness: 1" insulated) Entrance Exterior Storefront 3' - 6" GL-2 Storefront Framing Mapes Rabbet R+ butt jointed High Polished Aluminum (DM HPA)(thickness: 2" insulated spandrel) Entrance Exterior Storefront 3' - 6" GL-C2 Spandrel Glass Vitro Architectural Glass (aka PPG) or equivalent Insulating Glass System PPG Black --0' - 0" HSRD Rytec High Speed Roll Up Door Representative: Brady Bell 0' - 0" SF-1 Storefront Framing Kawneer TRIFAB 451 System -butt jointed Entrance Exterior Storefront 0' - 0" UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT, 17 U.S.C. AS AMENDED DECEMBER 1, 1990, ALSO KNOWN AS THE "ARCHITECTURAL WORKSPROTECTION ACT OF 1990", THESE DOCUMENTS ARE COPYRIGHTED AND ARE SUBJECT TO COPYRIGHT PROTECTION AS AN"ARCHITECTURAL WORK". THE DESIGN, SPATIAL FORMS, IDEAS, COMPOSITIONS AND ARRANGEMENT OF ITEMS DELINEATEDIN THIS SET OF PLANS ARE PROPRIETARY OF SYVERTSEN RIGOSU ARCHITECTS, PLLC (SRA). UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESEPLANS CAN LEGALLY RESULT IN THE CESSATION OF SUCH CONSTRUCTION OR BUILDING BEING SEIZED AND RAZED. 2022 SYVERTSEN RIGOSU ARCHITECTS, PLLC (SRA)© 10.04.2022 Goss Jeep Renovation & Addition Goss Jeep SD-5 View From Green Mountain Drive UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT, 17 U.S.C. AS AMENDED DECEMBER 1, 1990, ALSO KNOWN AS THE "ARCHITECTURAL WORKSPROTECTION ACT OF 1990", THESE DOCUMENTS ARE COPYRIGHTED AND ARE SUBJECT TO COPYRIGHT PROTECTION AS AN"ARCHITECTURAL WORK". THE DESIGN, SPATIAL FORMS, IDEAS, COMPOSITIONS AND ARRANGEMENT OF ITEMS DELINEATEDIN THIS SET OF PLANS ARE PROPRIETARY OF SYVERTSEN RIGOSU ARCHITECTS, PLLC (SRA). UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESEPLANS CAN LEGALLY RESULT IN THE CESSATION OF SUCH CONSTRUCTION OR BUILDING BEING SEIZED AND RAZED. 2022 SYVERTSEN RIGOSU ARCHITECTS, PLLC (SRA)© 10.04.2022 Goss Jeep Renovation & Addition Goss Jeep SD-6 View From Shelburne Ave First Floor 0'-0" T.O. Existing Parapet 20'-0" Second Floor 10'-0" ACM-J1 GL-1 CW-1 EXP-J2 ACM-J2 ACM-J3 Sidewalk -8'-4"20'-0"8'-0"2'-0"10'-0"T.O. New Parapet 26'-0" A301 3 A B C 3'-0"First Floor 0'-0" T.O. Existing Parapet 20'-0" Second Floor 10'-0" ACM-J2 ACM-J3ACM-J1 CW-1 GL-1 EXP-J2 3'-0"10'-0"3"5'-9"2'-1"10'-0"3'-4"8'-0"4'-4"7'-4"4'-0"6'-0"26'-0"8'-0"2'-0"10'-0"ACM-J2 Sidewalk -8'-4" T.O. New Parapet 26'-0"10'-0"A B C UNDER THE COPYRIGHT ACT, 17 U.S.C. AS AMENDED DECEMBER 1, 1990, ALSO KNOWN AS THE "ARCHITECTURAL WORKSPROTECTION ACT OF 1990", THESE DOCUMENTS ARE COPYRIGHTED AND ARE SUBJECT TO COPYRIGHT PROTECTION AS AN"ARCHITECTURAL WORK". THE DESIGN, SPATIAL FORMS, IDEAS, COMPOSITIONS AND ARRANGEMENT OF ITEMS DELINEATEDIN THIS SET OF PLANS ARE PROPRIETARY OF SYVERTSEN RIGOSU ARCHITECTS, PLLC (SRA). UNAUTHORIZED USE OF THESEPLANS CAN LEGALLY RESULT IN THE CESSATION OF SUCH CONSTRUCTION OR BUILDING BEING SEIZED AND RAZED. 2022 SYVERTSEN RIGOSU ARCHITECTS, PLLC (SRA)© 10.04.2022 Goss Jeep Renovation & Addition Goss Jeep SD-7 1/8" = 1'-0"1 Building Section 1 1/8" = 1'-0"2 Building Section 2 Terracon Consultants-NY, Inc. 30 Corporate Circle, Suite 201 Albany, New York 12203 P (518) 266 0310 F (518) 266 9238 terracon.com REPORT COVER LETTER TO SIGN October 3, 2022 BBL Construction Services 302 Washington Ave Ext. Albany, NY 12203 Attn: Mr. Brent Kosoc E: bkosoc@bblinc.com Re: Addendum No. 1 to Geotechnical Engineering Report Goss Jeep Expansion 1650 Shelburne Road South Burlington, VT Terracon Project No. JB225122 Rev 1 Dear Mr. Kosoc: Terracon Consultants – NY, Inc. (Terracon) is submitting this Addendum to our Geotechnical Engineering Report (Terracon Project No. JB225122 Rev 1 last revised on September 23, 2022). We have reviewed the “Grading and Utility Plan” prepared by Engineering Ventures, PC, dated August 4, 2022 as well as the information provided to us by Mr. Mike Dussault, P.E. in his e-mail dated September 16, 2022. It is our understanding that the proposed stormwater management practice planned for the site has moved north about 65 feet or so from its originally planned location and we understand that the City of South Burlington, Vermont offered comments in their site plan review regarding the soils at the newly proposed location regarding their suitability for infiltration. Upon our review of the referenced site plan, the infiltration practice has been relocated north of test boring I-1 toward test boring B-2. Based on the subsurface conditions encountered in the test borings, the subsurface conditions at the new location of the infiltration practice are expected to consist of either coarse-grained Silty Sand or Well Graded Sand with Silt similar to those encountered in Borings I-1 and B-2, respectively. Should soils similar to those encountered in boring B-2 be encountered at the newly planned practice location, considering they are also coarse-grained in nature, we would expect these soils to have similar or better infiltration characteristics to the soils in which infiltration testing was originally performed. The bottom elevation of the infiltration practice is planned for elevation 156.25 feet, which is about 2 to 3 feet below existing site grades. Groundwater was encountered in B-2 at about 7.5 feet below existing grades or at about elevation 150.5 feet. As such, adequate separation between the groundwater and the bottom of the newly planned practice location is anticipated. Addendum No. 1 to Geotechnical Engineering Report Goss Jeep Expansion South Burlington, VT October 3, 2022 ■ Terracon Project No. JB225122 Rev 1 Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 2 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning this report or if we may be of further service, please contact us. Sincerely, Terracon Consultants-NY, Inc. John T. Odorisio, P.E. Joseph Robichaud, Jr., P.E. Sr. Geotechnical Engineer Principal/ Office Manager