HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda 05_SP-22-020_39 Bowdoin StreetCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
SP-22-020_39 Bowdoin Street_neagleychase_SC_2022-06-
21.docx
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
Report preparation date: September 28, 2022
Plans received: September 21, 2022
39 Bowdoin Street
Site Plan Application #SP-22-020
Meeting date: October 4, 2022
Owner
Northeast Territories
20 South Crest Drive
Burlington, VT 05401
Applicant
Neagley & Chase Construction
66 Bowdoin Street, PO Box 2204
South Burlington, VT 05407-2204
Property Information
Tax Parcel ID: 0257-00039 3.4 acres
Industrial & Open Space Zoning District, Hinesburg Road
North View Protection District, Airport Approach Cones
Engineer
Civil Engineering Associates, Inc.
10 Mansfield View Lane
South Burlington, VT 05403
Location Map
#SP-22-020
2
PROJECT DESCRPTION
The warned project description is as follows: Site plan application #SP-22-020 of Neagley & Chase
Construction to construct a single story 21,790 sf office building, create 2,160 sf of outdoor storage, and
associated site improvements, 39 Bowdoin St.
This application was reviewed by the Board on June 21, 2022. Since that date, the applicant has
modified the proposal to be the following: Site plan application #SP-22-020 of Neagley & Chase
Construction to construct a 12,840 sf contractor or building trade facility with supporting parking and
infrastructure improvements, 39 Bowdoin St.
Staff considers the applicant has incorrectly identified the use and square footage of the proposed
structure, but the description above is accurate.
CONTEXT
This item was continued from the June 21, 2022 meeting and then comprehensively revised following a
wetland delineation that found the wetland to be larger than previously thought. As a result, the
applicant adjusted their plans in order to maintain compliance with all pertinent wetland and wetland
buffer regulations.
COMMENTS
Development Review Planner Marla Keene and Development Review Planner I Marty Gillies (“Planning
Staff”) have reviewed the plans submitted on September 21, 2022 and offer the following comments.
Numbered comments for the Board’s attention are indicated in red.
A) ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
The lot is currently undeveloped.
IO Zoning District Required Proposed
Min. Lot Size, non-residential use 3 acres 4 acres
Max. Building Height Flat Roof 40 ft 33 ft1
Max. Building Coverage 30% 6.6%
Max. Overall Coverage 50% 21%
Max. Front Setback Coverage 30% 11.9 & 29.8%
Min. Front Setback 50 ft 30.6 & 41.5 ft2
Min. Side Setback 35 ft 84 ft
Min. Rear Setback 50 ft N/A
1. It appears the applicant’s proposed height is calculated based on the floor to ceiling height of the building,
not the height as calculated from the average preconstruction grade of the site. Furthermore, there is a
discrepancy between the stated height in the application (33 feet) and the height demonstrated in the
elevations (roughly 25 feet). Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to provide a height measured
from average pre-construction grade prior to closing the hearing.
2. The applicant is proposing to encroach into the front setback by approximately 19.4 feet on the south side of
the property and by approximately 8.5 feet on the east side. The applicant has requested a setback waiver to
reduce the front yard setbacks to 35 feet, but that will not be sufficient to accommodate the proposed
#SP-22-020
3
building footprint. As such, Staff recommends the Board instead consider a waiver to reduce the front yard
setback from 50 feet to 30 feet.
13.06 Airport Approach Cones
All applications for development within the Airport Approach Cones, as shown on the Overlay Districts
Map, involving new or expanded buildings or structures shall provide documentation that either a
Notice to the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) is not required, or an application for a Determination of
No Hazard has been submitted to the FAA. Where an application for Determination of No Hazard has
been submitted, no zoning permit for construction shall be issued without demonstration of receipt of
an issued Determination.
The property is located entirely within an airport approach cone. The applicant has provided a
Determination of No Hazard to Air Navigation, issued March 7, 2022. Staff considers this criterion met.
10.02G Hinesburg Road-North View Protection Zone
(1) No part of any structure within the Hinesburg Road-North View Protection Zone shall exceed an
elevation of 393.5 feet above mean sea level plus 5.8 feet for each 1000 feet that said part of said
structure is horizontally distant from the Hinesburg Road-North View Protection Zone Base Line
shown on the above referenced Scenic View Protection Overlay District Map.
Based on the applicant’s testimony that the building is 33 ft in height, and the proposed grade of
348 ft, Staff estimates that, prior to discussion of height, the highest this flat roof could reasonably
be is 381 ft. Since this is below the elevation of the baseline, 10.02G(1) is met.
(2) Landscaping and other vegetation located within the Hinesburg Road-North View Protection Zone
shall be maintained so that it does not exceed an elevation of 393.5 feet above mean sea level plus
5.8 feet for each 1000 feet that said landscaping or vegetation is horizontally distant from the
Hinesburg Road - North View Protection Zone Base Line shown on the above referenced Scenic View
Protection Overlay District Map.
The nearest trees are located approximately 2,500 ft from the baseline, which results in a maximum
allowable tree height of 408 ft. The nearest trees are proposed to be at elevation 344, with a max
height of 50 – 60 ft, or 404 ft. Staff considers this criterion met.
B) SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS
14.06 General Review Standards
A. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site.
(1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure
to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking
areas. The DRB shall consider the following:
(a) Street Frontage. Maintain internally-consistent building setbacks and landscaping
along the street.
#SP-22-020
4
(b) Building Placement, Orientation. Maintain or establish a consistent orientation to the
street and, where a prevalent pattern exists, shall continue the manner in which the site’s
existing building foundations relate to the site’s topography and grade.
(c) Transition Contrast in Scale. Minimize and mitigate abrupt contrasts in scale between
existing, planned or approved development, and proposed development.
(d) Pedestrian Orientation. Improve and enhance pedestrian connections and walkability
within the area proposed for development.
(e) Solar Gain. Orient their rooflines to maximize solar gain potential, to the extent possible
within the context of the overall standards of these regulations.
The building is proposed to have one loading dock facing east. The loading dock doors will be at
grade with the proposed base of the building, though the ground will be lower. Both the south
and east-facing facades include over a dozen windows and are fronted by landscaping features,
including maple trees and ornamental plantings, including shrubs and perennials. The proposed
entry is located in the southwest corner of the building, on the west façade. The applicant has
attempted to integrate the proposed parklet into this area of the building to connect the west
side of the building to the frontage along the south side, and to the street.
Transitions are discussed under 14.06(C) below. Adequacy of planting and pedestrian movement
are discussed elsewhere in this document.
For the proposed 11,317 sf building, twenty-three (23) parking spaces are provided. Staff
considers parking area to be adequate.
(2) Parking:
(a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Any side of a building facing a
public street shall be considered a front side of a building for the purposes of this subsection.
This criterion is met.
B. Relationship of Structures and Site to Adjoining Area.
(1) The Development Review Board shall encourage the use of a combination of common
materials and architectural characteristics (e.g., rhythm, color, texture, form or detailing),
landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between
buildings of different architectural styles.
(2) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to
existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed
structures.
(3) To accomplish (1) and (2), the DRB shall consider:
(a) Pattern and Rhythm. Update or maintain or extend the overall pattern of
development defined by the planned or existing street grid, block configurations,
position and orientation of principal buildings, prevalence of attached or detached
building types.
#SP-22-020
5
(b) Architectural Features. Respond to recurring or representative architectural
features that define neighborhood character, without adhering to a particular
architectural style.
(c) Privacy. Limit impacts and intrusions to privacy on adjoining properties,
including side and back yard areas through context sensitive design.
The applicant has provided elevations of the proposed building. The building is proposed to be
clad in metal panels. The adjacent sites in Meadowland Business Park have a similar
architectural style, with the exception of the existing Neagley and Chase building which is
partially constructed of brick. Staff considers this criterion to be met.
C. Site Amenity Requirement
(1) Sites are required to include a specific minimum area for appropriate Site Amenities. This
section does not apply to projects within the City Center FBC District (which are governed by Section
8.08).
(2) Applicability. Applications for the following shall be required to provide Site Amenities:
(a) Any non-residential development over 5,000 SF.
(b) Additions or expansions exceeding 5,000 SF for existing non-residential structures.
(c) Any residential development, including conversion of non-residential structures to
residential use.
The proposed facility exceeds 5,000 sf in size and therefore these standards apply.
(3) The required area shall be:
(a) For Non-Residential development, a minimum of 6% of non-residential building gross
floor area.
(b) For Residential development, determined by number of units as:
(i) For fewer than 10 units, 100 square feet per unit;
(ii) For 10 to 19 units, 85 square feet per unit; or
(iii) For 20 or more units, 60 square feet per unit.
The proposed 11,317 sf building requires a minimum of 680 sf of Site Amenity. The proposed Site
Amenity is a 1,338 sf parklet located near the southwest corner of the building, directly adjacent to
the proposed primary entrance and existing public sidewalk. The proposed site Amenity features four
paperbark maples. Presently, no seating structures are proposed as part of the parklet.
3. The Snippet/Parklet Site Amenity must primarily feature year-round, fixed, high-quality seating. Staff
recommends the Board require the applicant to demonstrate compliance with this requirement.
14.07 Specific Review Standards
In all Zoning Districts and the City Center Form Based Codes District, the following standards shall
apply:
#SP-22-020
6
A. Environmental Protection Standards. All proposed development shall be subject to the
applicable requirements of Article 12, Environmental Protection Standards.
The property contains a wetland, wetland buffer, and river corridor. The river corridor is
contained entirely within the wetland and wetland buffer. The applicant is proposing minor
grading outside of the wetland buffer and is proposing to appropriately fence the fill used for
this project in order to avoid impacts to the wetland buffer.
The applicant is also proposing to construct the proposed sewer connection within the approved
class II wetland buffer. While public infrastructure may be allowed within a Class III wetland or
buffer, no such exemption exists for Class II wetlands and their buffers, therefore Staff considers
the proposed encroachment to be prohibited.
4. Staff recommends the board require the applicant to modify their proposal to connect the
proposed project to the existing City sewer line outside of the Class II wetland buffer.
B. Site Design Features. All proposed development shall comply with standards for the
placement of buildings, parking and loading areas, landscaping and screening, open space,
stormwater, lighting, and other applicable standards related to site design pursuant to these
Land Development Regulations.
These standards are contained in Article 13 and are discussed below.
C. Access and Circulation. All proposed development shall comply with site access and
circulation standards of Section 15.A.14.
Much of 15.A.14 pertains to the construction of streets, which are not applicable to this
application. The applicable sections of 15.A.14 follow.
15.A.14 (D) Functional Capacity and Transit Oriented Development. The nearest signalized
intersection or those intersections specified by the DRB shall have an overall level of
service “D” or better, at the peak street hour, including the anticipated impact of the fully
developed proposed PUD or subdivision. In addition, the level of service of each through
movement on the major roadway shall have a level of service of “D” or better at full
buildout.
Traffic was reviewed with the prior application. However, since the project is significantly
modified, Staff has performed a new review. The applicant has estimated traffic based on
5,659 sf of General Industrial use and 5,659 sf of Warehousing use. Staff considers that a
more accurate reflection of the proposed use of the building from a traffic perspective is
12,840 sf of Contractor/Building Trade Facility use. Staff does not have access to the current
version of the ITE manual, however, Staff considers there are uses such as Specialty Trade
Contractor that may more accurately reflect the proposed use of the structure when
calculating traffic impacts.
5. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to revise the trip generation calculations
using the updated building square footage and proposed use.
6. Staff further recommends the Board establish as part of their decision an approved PM Peak
Hour Trip Generation for the purpose of calculating traffic impact fees.
#SP-22-020
7
15.A.14(E) Access and Circulation. The applicant must demonstrate that the street network
is arranged to meet applicable access management, traffic, and pedestrian circulation
standards under these Regulations, including criteria for site plans under Article 14,
Transect Zone Subdivisions under Article 9, or a type of Planned Unit Development under
Article 15.C; and, for state highways, VTrans Access Management Program Guidelines in
effect at the time of application. Unless otherwise specified under these regulations, the
street network, including the location and arrangement of streets, must be designed to:
(1)-(6) not applicable
(7) Provide for safe access to abutting properties for motorists, cyclists, and
pedestrians, including safe sight distances, access separation distances, and
accommodations for high-accident locations.
(8) Align access point with existing intersections or curb cuts and consolidate existing
access points or curb cuts within the subdivision, to the extent physically and
functionally feasible.
Staff considers the pedestrian access to be adequate and supports the proposed
driveway widths.
At previous hearings, the Board asked the applicant whether the curb cut on Bowdoin St
could be re-configured to align with the existing curb cut on the opposite side of the
street. One potential advantage is that this would result in trucks making their
maneuvers on the site rather than in the public way. Staff notes the provided plan
presents a similar curb cut configuration as the 2019 sketch plan configuration.
7. Staff considers there are no substantial topographical challenges, and recommends the
Board discuss with the applicant whether to modify their site plan to construct the
driveway so that it both aligns with the driveway on the opposite side of Bowdoin Street
and with the drive aisle, to ease internal circulation and allow the trucks to back to the
loading docks from the parking lot rather than from the street.
(9) Minimize vehicular access point (curb cuts) to abutting properties and building lots
along pedestrian oriented street frontage; and provide, where feasible, shared
vehicular access to frontage and other abutting building lots via rear alleys, side
streets, service lanes, shared driveways, or rear cross connections between adjoining
parcels.
The street network in this location is such that Bowdoin Street cannot be extended
much further due to the location of the interstate, and Meadowland Drive cannot be
extended much further due to the location of Muddy Brook and its associated wetland
complex. Because of the wetland to the west, no connection to the west may occur.
The northern property is occupied by the Department of Homeland Security, and as
such no cross lot connection to the north is recommended. Staff considers this criterion
met.
D. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) [reserved]
#SP-22-020
8
E. Building Form. Development within the City Center Form Based Code District, the Urban
Design Overlay District, and other districts with supplemental building form standards shall
adhere to the standards contained therein.
Not applicable.
F. Streetscape Improvements. A proposed new construction or extension/expansion of an
existing structure exceeding the thresholds listed in either (a) Section 14.09(B) or (b) Section
8.11(D) within the City Center Form Based Code, or Section 3.15(D) in all other zoning districts,
shall be required to upgrade adjacent sidewalks, greenbelts, and related street furniture
(trees, benches, etc.) to the standards contained within the applicable Street Type and
Building Envelope Standard. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to limit
requirements for additional upgrades as necessary to meet the requirements of these
Regulations.
Staff considers Bowdoin Street to be an Industrial Access Road, which requires a 10-ft wide
recreation path and street trees. The applicant is proposing street trees. There is an existing 5-ft
bituminous walk on the side of the street facing the subject property. Given the nature of the
street and its limited potential for expansion, Staff considers the existing facility to be sufficient.
Staff considers this criterion met.
F. Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land may be required on any lot for
provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce
curb cuts onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or
other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area.
Staff considers no reservation of land to be necessary.
G. Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire-served utility lines and service
connections shall be underground insofar as feasible and subject to state public utilities
regulations. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a
harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Standards of Section 15.A.18,
Infrastructure, Utilities, and Services, shall also be met.
Wire-served utilities are proposed to be underground.
The Director of Public Works reviewed the proposed plan on 6/1/2022 and indicated there were
no comments on this application. Staff considers the revised plans to be less impactful therefore
did not provide the plans for Public Works review. Staff anticipates changes necessitated for
connection to public infrastructure will be of the magnitude allowed as field changes.
The South Burlington Water Department Director reviewed the plans on May 27, 2022 and
offered several comments, which the applicant testifies to have incorporated as of September
21, 2022.
H. Disposal of Wastes. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including
compliance with any recycling, composting, or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure
and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the
enclosure(s). Small receptacles intended for use by households or the public (ie, non-dumpster,
non-large drum) shall not be required to be fenced or screened.
#SP-22-020
9
8. The proposed dumpster location is to be screened, but Staff considers insufficient information
about the screening is provided to confirm whether this criterion is met. The material is called out
as “screen board or other material as per owners request.” Staff recommends the Board require
the applicant to demonstrate compliance with this criterion as a condition of approval.
C) SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS
13.02 Off Street Parking and Loading
F. Access management Requirements. It is the intent of the City to minimize traffic and
pedestrian conflicts caused by vehicular driveways on public roadways by reducing the
number of required driveways and by minimizing the number of vehicles utilizing such
driveways off public roadways. All applicants must make an effort to reduce these impacts. All
commercial lots (retail, restaurant, office, service uses, excluding residential, agricultural and
industrial uses) located adjacent to other commercial lots must provide a driveway connection
to any adjacent commercial lot. If the adjacent property owner does not want to provide for
that connection, the applicant must provide an easement to do so in the future when
circumstances may change. This driveway connection or easement should be located where
vehicular and pedestrian circulation is most feasible.
As discussed above, Staff considers cross-lot connections to not be viable. However, in the case
of a site plan, the Board only has the authority to waive dimensional requirements.
9. The applicant has proposed a 20-ft wide access easement to the property to the north in
accordance with this requirement. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to provide
a draft easement document prior to closing the hearing.
G. Design requirements for Parking Spaces, Parking Aisles, Lighting and Landscaping
(1) Design requirements for off-street parking and loading are provided in Table 13-2
and Figure 13-1, Section 13.04, Landscaping , Screening, and Street Trees, and Section
13.07, Exterior Lighting. All paved parking spaces shall be striped or otherwise
physically delimited.
Dimensional requirements are met.
Parking lot landscaping and lighting are further discussed below.
(2) The location of parking areas and loading docks shall prevent conflicts with
entering and existing traffic onto a public street and prevent conflicts between
vehicles and pedestrians. The distance between access points and parking areas shall
be adequate to minimize blockage and prevent back-ups onto the public street.
As noted above, the location of the loading dock requires trucks to reverse in Bowdoin
Street. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to revise the driveway to
allow trucks to reverse within the site.
(3) Provision shall be made for access by police, fire and emergency vehicles.
The Fire Chief reviewed the plans on 6/1/2022 and provided the following comments.
Our Office has had an opportunity to review the sketch plans for the 39 Bowdoin St
application. As the building is set back from street we will need to ensure FD Aerial
access via the parking lots on North and West sides. The traffic pattern and parking
#SP-22-020
10
lot infrastructure need to accommodate the apparatus (1990 WB-40 – straight dual
rear axle design). The building will need fire sprinkler and standpipe coverage as
well.
The applicant indicated on 6/8 that the proposed building will be sprinklered and that
they would provide supplemental information depicting the turning movement around
the building as well as the proposed FDC location.
10. Staff has been unable to locate turning movement information in the revised materials
provided on 9/21. Staff continues to recommend the Board require the applicant to
address the Fire Chief’s comments which pertain to site design prior to closing the
hearing.
(4) Pedestrian safety. Insofar as practicable, pedestrian and bicycle circulation shall be
separated from motor vehicle circulation. Safe and convenient pedestrian circulation,
including appropriate sidewalks, shall be provided on the site and its approaches. The
pedestrian circulation on site shall be designed to minimize adverse effects of
vehicular traffic on sidewalks and recreation paths.
Staff considers appropriate pedestrian accommodations have been provided.
(5) Bicycle parking or storage facility. See Section 13.03
(6) Stormwater management strategies that facilitate infiltration including but not
limited to recessed planting islands, bioretention facilities, and pervious parking
spaces are encouraged in the design of any off-street parking or loading area.
Stormwater management is discussed under 13.05 below.
13.03 Bicycle Parking and Storage.
The applicant has provided two bicycle racks, providing parking for four bicycles.
Required Bike Parking Required
Short Term (1 per 5k sf office, 1
per 20k sf contractor facility,
minimum 4)
4
Long Term (50% of short term
retail and office, 1 per unit)
2
Clothes Lockers 1
Long-term bicycle parking requirements include providing a secure storage location that supports a
bicycle upright, allows secure locking of the frame and wheel, and protects the entire bicycle against
theft and weather. These requirements can be met by providing a bicycle storage room inside the
building or by providing bicycle lockers, or other private enclosures, outside of the building. Additionally,
50% of the long-term parking requirement can be met by secure, private office spaces, given that they
are on the first floor, accessible, and of a sufficient size.
11. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to provide long-term bicycle parking at the site, noting
that 50% of the required long-term bicycle parking requirement can be met by private office space. As
#SP-22-020
11
such, Staff considers that the applicant must provide one additional long-term bicycle parking space and
an associated clothes locker, and recommends that the Board require the applicant to do so prior to
closing the hearing.
13.04 Landscaping, Screening & Street Trees
B. Except for parking spaces accessory to a one-family or two-family dwelling, all off-street
parking areas subject to review by the Development Review Board, shall be curbed and landscaped
with appropriate trees, shrubs, and other plants including ground covers, as approved by the
Development Review Board. Sections of recessed curb are permitted if their purpose is to allow
stormwater runoff from the adjacent parking area to reach stormwater collection, treatment and
management infrastructure. The Development Review Board shall consider the adequacy of the
proposed landscaping to assure the establishment of a safe, convenient, and attractive parking area
and the privacy and comfort of abutting properties.
(1) All off-street parking areas shall be landscaped around the perimeter of the lot with trees,
shrubs and other plants. Perimeter planting shall be set back from the curb sufficiently to allow for
snow storage. The purpose of perimeter planting shall be to mitigate the view of the parking lot
from the public way and from adjacent uses and properties, and to provide shade and canopy for
the parking lot. In some situations it may be necessary both for surveillance purposes and for the
perception of safety to install the size and type of plants that leave visual access between the
parking lot to the public way or other pedestrian areas.
Parking areas are proposed to be curbed. A minimum number of trees are proposed around the
perimeter of the parking areas.
(2) In all parking areas containing twenty-eight (28) or more contiguous parking spaces
and/or in parking lots with more than a single circulation lane, at least ten percent (10%) of the
interior of the parking lot shall be landscaped islands planted with trees, shrubs and other plants.
Such requirement shall not apply to structured parking or below-ground parking.
The proposed parking area includes only twenty-three (23) parking spaces. As such, this criterion is
not applicable.
(3) All interior and perimeter planting shall be protected by curbing unless specifically designed as
a collection and treatment area for management of stormwater runoff as per 13.04(B)(5)(c)
below. Interior planted islands shall have a minimum dimension of six (6) feet on any one side, and
shall have a minimum square footage of sixty (60) square feet. Large islands are encouraged.
Curbing is provided. Staff considers this criterion met.
(4) Landscaping Requirements
(a) Landscaping shall include a variety of trees, shrubs, grasses and ground covers. All
planting shall be species hardy for the region and, if located in areas receiving road runoff or
salt spray, shall be salt-tolerant.
Staff considers this criterion met.
(b) At least one (1) major deciduous shade tree shall be provided within or near the
perimeter of each parking area, for every five (5) parking spaces. The trees shall be placed
#SP-22-020
12
evenly throughout the parking lot to provide shade and reduce glare. Trees shall be placed a
minimum of thirty (30) feet apart.
23 parking spaces are provided, requiring 5 shade trees. 3 shade trees are provided, and all 3 are
proposed to be located on the east side of the parking area, adjacent to the building.
12. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to fully meet this requirement and revise the
distribution of the shade trees prior to closing the hearing.
(c) Trees shall have a caliper equal to or greater than two and one-half (2 ½) inches when
measured on the tree stem, six (6) inches above the root ball.
This criterion is met.
(c) Where more than ten (10) trees are installed, a mix of species is encouraged; the
species should be grouped or located in a manner that reinforces the design and layout of the
parking lot and the site.
The applicant is proposing to install twelve trees, elven of which are maples. The twelfth tree is
a five-foot-high evergreen.
13. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to fully meet this requirement by providing a
more diverse mix of tree species.
(e) Within the City Center FBC District, landscaping required within this section shall not
count towards meeting minimum landscape budget requirements as detailed in Section
13.04(G).
This criterion is not applicable.
(7) Snow storage areas must be specified and located in an area that minimizes the potential for
erosion and contaminated runoff into any adjacent or nearby surface waters.
Snow storage areas are shown in different locations on different plans submitted by the applicant.
Specifically, the snow storage areas shown on Sheet C2.1 conflict with those shown on Sheet L1.1.
14. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to clarify where the snow storage areas will be
located prior to closing the hearing.
C. Screening or buffering. The Development Review Board will require landscaping, fencing, land
shaping and/or screening along property boundaries (lot lines) whenever it determines that a) two
adjacent sites are dissimilar and should be screened or buffered from each other, or b) a property’s
appearance should be improved, which property is covered excessively with pavement or structures or
is otherwise insufficiently landscaped, or c) a commercial, industrial, and multi-family use abuts a
residential district or institutional use, or (d) a parking or loading area is adjacent to or visible from a
public street.
Staff considers the project to be similar to adjacent uses and this criterion to be not applicable.
D. Front Yards of Non-Residential and Multi-Family Uses. In the case of non-residential and multi-
family uses, the required front yard and/or the frontage along designated arterial and collector
streets (see Article 3, Section 3.06 for this list) shall be suitably landscaped and maintained in good
appearance. Landscape elements that reduce stormwater runoff and promote stormwater infiltration
#SP-22-020
13
are encouraged. The Development Review Board shall require the applicant to meet the provisions of
sections 13.04(F) and (G).
The applicant is proposing a suitable amount of landscaping in the front yards, including a conveyance
swale. As such, Staff considers this criterion met.
G(3) Landscaping Budget Requirements. The Development Review Board shall require minimum
planting costs for all site plans, as shown in Table 13-4 below. In evaluating landscaping requirements,
some credit may be granted for existing trees or for site improvements other than tree planting as
long as the objectives of this section are not reduced. The costs below are cumulative; for example, a
landscaping budget shall be required to show a planned expenditure of three percent of the first
$250,000 in construction or improvement cost plus two percent of the next $250,000 in construction or
improvement cost, plus one percent of the remaining cost over $500,000. The landscaping budget shall
be prepared by a landscape architect or professional landscape designer.
The applicant has provided neither a project cost calculation nor a valuation of the landscaping elements
to be installed. As such, it is impossible to calculate whether the applicant has met the minimum
requirements for landscaping requirements.
15. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to provide a project cost and values of each of the
landscaping elements included in the landscaping plan before the conclusion of the hearing.
13.05 Stormwater Management
Stormwater standards apply when one-half acre or more of impervious surface exists or is proposed to
exist, and where 5,000 sf of impervious is created or reconstructed. The City Stormwater Section will
review these plans prior to the scheduled DRB hearing on Thursday, October 6th, and Staff will provide
an update including those comments at that time.
13.07 Exterior Lighting
Lighting requirements are summarized as follows.
(1) Fixtures must be downcast and shielded
(2) Illumination must be evenly distributed
(3) Fixtures must be placed to minimize lighting from becoming a nuisance
(4) Poles shall be rustproof metal, cast iron, fiberglass, finished wood or similar structural
material, with a decorative surface or finish
(5) Poles & building mounted fixtures may be no higher than 30-ft
(6) Poles must be located in safe locations
Specific requirements for maximum illumination levels are included in Appendix A and are limited to 3
foot candles average at ground level. The applicant has provided a photometric drawing indicating this
criterion is met.
#SP-22-020
14
16. One of the lights included in a cut sheet submitted by the applicant does not meet the downcast and
shielded requirements. Staff recommends the board include a condition that only the lights specified on
the plans, and not all the lights included in the cut sheets, be permitted.
13.08 Outdoor Storage and Display
The applicant is proposing to use a 705 sf screened area accessible as outdoor storage
A. Outdoor Storage. Outdoor storage of goods, materials, vehicles for other than daily use, and
equipment shall be subject to the following provisions:
(1) Any outdoor storage shall be appurtenant to the primary use of the property and shall be allowed
only in nonresidential districts and upon approval of the DRB in conjunction with a site plan,
conditional use and/or PUD application.
Staff considers this criterion met.
(2) The Development Review Board may require that outdoor storage areas in connection with
commercial or industrial uses be enclosed and/or screened where the storage area may comprise
an attractive nuisance, where the proposed use of the storage areas present opportunities for theft,
or where the Board finds that said storage areas are in view of residentially-zoned parcels.
The applicant is proposing to enclose the area with a 6-foot to 7-foot chain link fence with plastic slats.
Staff considers this criterion met.
3.18 Energy Standards
All new buildings are subject to the Stretch Energy Code pursuant to Section 3.18: Residential and
Commercial Building Energy Standards of the LDRs. This now includes provision of a solar-ready roof.
17. Staff recommends the Board discuss with the applicant how the roof will comply with the standard. If
the applicant demonstrates satisfactory compliance with this requirement, Staff considers demonstration
of it on the plans can be a condition of approval.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board work with the applicant to address the issues identified herein.
Respectfully submitted,
Marla Keene, Development Review Planner
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
10 Mansfield View Lane Phone:802-864-2323
South Burlington, VT 05403 Fax:802-864-2271
E-Mail: dmarshall@cea-vt.com
September 21, 2022
Ms. Marla Keene, PEDevelopment Review Planner
City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning
575 Dorset StreetSouth Burlington, Vermont 05403
Re:Northeast Territories, Inc.39 Bowdoin Street SP-22-020
Lot 7 at Meadowland Business Park
Site Plan Application for Proposed Office Space and Contractor’s Yard
Revised Site Layout
Dear Ms. Keene:
Based upon the updated wetland delineation for the property, we have revised the
site plan to avoid the newly delineated wetlands and the 50-foot buffer except for the
connection to the existing sewer service stub.
Similar to the original plan submittal package, this proposal includes the two pints of
access as a means of maximizing circulation opportunities around the building tobenefit both day to day operations as well as access for emergency services.
Unlike the original application, this update now includes the required site amenity
area chosen to be located at the main entrance on the southwest corner of thebuilding. This building entrance orientation is similar to that used by Logic Supply on
the next lot to the west.
We have updated the original application cover letter herein:
The primary components of this application include:
1.The creation of a new 11,317 SF Contractor’s Yard facility on Lot 7 with afront yard setback waiver request from 50-feet to 35-feet.
2.Creation of 23 parking spaces
3.Extension of underground utility service lines from Meadowland Drive into thesite.
View Protection Zone -The proposed facility is located well below the Hinesburg
Road North View Protection Zone Overlay. The street tree plantings have been
Ms.Marla KeenePage2of9
September 21, 2022
chosen so as to minimize the potential for the street trees to extend vertically up into
the VPZ with a 64-foot (408 base line –344 finish grade)maximum height.Wepreviouslysubmittedan image indicating these values.
Airport Approach Cone –The project has received FAA approval for its placement
at this location (attached)
Street Access –With frontage on two streets, the project is seeking to maximize
perimeter circulation pattern by proposing curb cuts on both Meadowland Drive andBowdoin Street.
Fire Access -The multiple driveway access points will maximize emergency vehicle
circulation opportunities.
Setback Waiver –As part of the City’s review of the same site layout in 2019 it
indicated in the Staff report that:
The applicants proposed site plan requires waiver of front setback requirements
from 50 feet to 35 feet.The Board may grant setback waivers up to five feet
from the property line.At this time it does not appear that other dimensionalwaiverswillberequired.Staff has no concerns with the proposed layout as it
pertains to dimensional requirements.
This was reinforced during the Sketch Plan review of this project.
Cross Lot Access -The applicant has not proposed a physical cross lot access at
this time as the Homeland Security facility as no historical interest in enabling
improved access to the property due to security concerns. The applicant has shown
a reservation for a future access easement to Lots 8&9 to the north (HomelandSecurity) in case there was ever a change in land use that would benefit from that
circulation opportunity.
Stormwater –Lot 7 is burdened with a high groundwater table and low rates of
permeability due primarily to the presence of the Vergennes Clay soil type which soil
mapping shows occupying the majority of this portion of the Meadowland Business
Park.This soil type was reconfirmed with subsurface soil explorations in the vicinity
of the proposed building footprint.As such, the opportunity for on-site infiltration of
stormwater cannot be achieved as otherwise required in Article 12.03 the LandDevelopment Regulations.Lacking the ability to infiltrate, Article 12 requires that the
applicant implement LID approaches where possible and to comply with the State
Stormwater Rules. The latter requirement is consistent with the current Individual
Permit State Stormwater authorization issued for the Business Park which requires
Ms.Marla KeenePage3of9
September 21, 2022
that all future development projects meet the standards of the current State
Stormwater Rules.
The applicant is proposing to utilize underground stormwater chambers as a means
of meeting the stormwater treatment and peak flow management requirements from
the property as there is no space to enable the use of a Tier 2 STP.The area to the
wets of the west parking may be subject to a future requirement to remove some of
that fill material reducing the viability of placing a gravel wetland in that area.
Traffic –A Traffic Impact Study was developed by Lamoureaux & Dickenson for the
original 21,000 SF building project.The PM Peak hour trip end generation wasinternally revised to reflect the elimination of the office space and the downsizing of
the Contractor’s yard to yield a PM Peak hour trip generation value of 6 VTE.When
the original PM Peak Hour VTEs were applied to the existing and future background
traffic levels at the Meadowland Drive-Hinesburg Road intersection, the TIS
indicated that the turning movements at the intersection do not trigger the warrants
for the installation of a traffic signal system at this time.More on this in Item 7
below.
Landscaping –The proposed landscaping plans were developed by CynthiaKnaupf, Landscape Architect.
Lighting –Site lighting is being provided through the use of a combination building
mounted downcast LED luminaires and area lights for the parking lots.
Project Schedule –The project schedule calls for construction to commence in the
early Summer 2023 and be completed in Winter of 2023.
Earthwork –The project is designed to be a no net export project. The amount of
granular material to be imported into the site is approximately 2,100 CY.
In support of hopefully reducing the number of open issues, we have developed
responses to some of the earlier staff comments as they relate to this updated
proposal.
We have inserted the “red” staff recommendations as a starting point in support of
the applicant’s responses
1.It appears the applicant’s proposed height is calculated based on the floor to ceiling height of
the building,not the height as calculated from the average preconstruction grade of the site.
The project involves significant regrading of the site,therefore Staff recommends the Board
require the applicant to provide a height measured from average pre-construction grade
prior to closing the hearing.This calculation is depicted on Sheet HB-1.0.
Ms.Marla KeenePage4of9
September 21, 2022
2. Staff recommends the Board discuss whether either street facing façade should be
reconfigured to have more interest and have the principal entry face south Staff also notes
that there is presently no entry to the space labelled “tenant space 2” on the architectural
plans.As the building has been reduced in size the tenant space has been eliminated.
The proposed entry remains in the southwest corner of the building on the west façade.
The amenity space has been integrated into this area of the building to engage the west
side of the building to the street. This technique was used at Logic Supply which is
located on the next lot to the west.
3. The applicant is proposing to alter existing grade by leveling the site, roughly holding the
elevation at Bowdoin Street and installing a retaining wall along the wetland buffer. The
retaining wall has a maximum height of approximately nine (9) feet, occurring at it’s
northwestern corner. The building therefore does not particularly conform to existing
topography. Staff recommends the Board discuss whether they consider this criterion met.
The Board may wish to request renderings in support of this criterion.The original retaining
wall on the west side of the property has been eliminated.The remaining project area is
intended to mimic the abutting streets. In this case as Meadowland Drive roadway
surface passes the property is was constructed in a fill. The proposed fill at the west end
of the property is intended to facilitate access to Meadowland Drive
4.Staff recommends the Board direct the applicant to include a Site Amenity of at least 1,307
s.f. using one or more of the allowable Site Amenity Types in Article 11C of the Land
Development Regulations.The smaller building now only requires a Site Amenity Area of
680 SF. This is depicted in greatest detail on the site landscaping plan prepared by
Cynthia Knauf.(L1.1)
5. Staff recommends the Board ask the applicant to describe how they proposed to avoid
temporary wetland impacts during construction and determine what additional information
should be included either on the EPSC plans or in the conditions of approval to enforce that
no impacts shall be acceptable. There is no longer any allowance within the LDR for the
Board to allow impacts within Class II wetland buffers for new construction.The project has
eliminated the originally proposed segmental retaining wall and now proposes minor
grading outside of the wetland buffer. Provisions for temporary installation of silt fence
along the limits of fill have been integrated into the plan.
6. Staff recommends the Board ask the applicant to clarify the proposed use of the building. If
it is proposed to be entirely office, Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to
update the TIS prior to closing the hearing. The applicant’s provided floor plan seems to
indicate some of the spaces are not yet assigned. Staff considers that if the applicant wishes
to not designate the entirety of the building at this time, they may permit a portion as
vacant, though when the applicant later wishes to assigning a use, it will require an
Ms.Marla KeenePage5of9
September 21, 2022
amendment to the site plan with associated TIA update.The intent of the LUC chosen in
the TIA was to identify the equivalent of 11,317 SF Contractor’s Yard use. The office use
has been eliminated so the original traffic study is conservative in its findings..
7. Staff further recommends the Board establish as part of their decision an approved PM Peak
Hour Trip Generation for the purpose of calculating traffic impact fees. In order to do this,
the applicant must commit to a distribution of uses.The PM Peak Hour Trip end generation
of the hybrid uses (LUC 110 and LUC 130)originally chosen by the traffic consultant along
with the General Office LUC 720 created a PM Peak Hour trip generation of 27 VTE.The
downsizing of the contractor’s yard and the elimination of the office component reduces
the PM Peak hour trip generation to 6 VTE.
Proposed 11,317 SF/2 = 5,659 SF of LUC 110 General Industrial/original 6,960 SF x original 6 VTE = 4.9 VTE
` Plus
Proposed 11,317 SF/2 = 5,659 SF of LUC 130 Warehousing/original 6,960 SF x original 1 VTE =0.8 VTE
8. BFJ did not have the grading plans available when they made their comment. Staff considers
there are no substantial topographical challenges, and recommends the Board require the
applicant to modify their site plan to align the driveway so that it both aligns with the
driveway on the opposite side of Bowdoin Street and with the drive aisle.When this same
plan was presented to Staff as part of the On-Logic campus proposal in 2019, we were
asked to consolidate the truck loading and vehicular curb cuts into one. This application
reflects the guidance we received at that time. We can resurrect the earliest concept of a
direct connection from the east end of the north parking area easterly out to Bowdoin
Street to align with the CBA office building driveway across the way. It should be pointed
out that the westerly curb cut out on to Meadowland Drive will receive the majority of
the turning movements as that is the shortest way for egress from the property to most
destination points. Therefore conflicts with CBA traffic movements will be occur on a less
frequent basis.
9. Staff recommends the Board determine whether to require the applicant to upgrade the
existing facility.The existing infrastructure is consistent with the City approved master
plan for the Meadowland Business Park. Lacking any goals of the City to implement
supplemental pedestrian ways to the north of the Business Park, the width of the existing
sidewalk, which is consistent with City standards, appears to be adequate without
further widening.
10. As of packet publication, the Director of Public Works had not yet had an opportunity to
review the plans. Staff anticipates having an update at the time of the hearing.We look
forward to seeing this when it is available.
The South Burlington Water Department Director reviewed the plans on May 27,
2022 and offers the following comments.
Ms.Marla KeenePage6of9
September 21, 2022
1.Plans must include a note stating “All water lines and appurtenances shall be
installed in accordance with the Champlain Water District Specifications and Details
for the Installation of Water Lines and Appurtenances, current edition.”
2.Record Drawings prepared by a VT licensed Professional Engineer shall be provided
to the South Burlington Water Department in pdf.and Auto-CAD format.Drawings
shall include ties to all gate valves and curb stops to sub-meter accuracy.
3.Existing line diameter must be confirmed prior to connection.
4.Tee for fire hydrant and sprinkler line shall be an anchor tee.The hydrant isolation
valve and sprinkler line valve shall be secured to the tee with Foster Glands.5.New fire hydrant to include 4”Stortz connection and spring-loaded hydrant flag.
6.Fire hydrant shall be considered private since it will be on a fire sprinkler line
dedicated to this facility.
7.New in-line valve before hydrant to be installed with restraining glands.
8.Refer to and specify CWD Specifications for C-900 installation requirements
including the installation of a tracing wire with independent termination boxes.All
ferrous materials incorporated in the installation of the PVC pipe shall be
polyethylene encased.Tap proposed for sprinkler line outside of building for an
appropriately sized domestic water service to be run independently into building.
Provide curb stop and box in Department approved location.Water service
material to be copper unless approved otherwise by the SBWD.
These comments have been integrated into the site utility plan and the supporting
details.
11. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to comply with the comments of the
SBWD Director prior to issuance of a zoning permit.Most of these items were already
included In the specifications portion of the plan set.The same specifications used for
the Water Dept. approval of the 105 Swift Street building, which had the exact same
comment wording from the Water Dept..,was used for this project.The Storts
connection requirement was added on Sheet C5.4.
12. The applicant has proposed a 20-ft wide access easement to the property to the north in
accordance with this requirement. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to
provide a draft easement document prior to closing the hearing.
Our Office has had an opportunity to review the sketch plans for the 39 Bowdoin St
application. As the building is set back from street we will need to ensure FD Aerial
access via the parking lots on North and West sides.The traffic pattern and parking lot
infrastructure need to accommodate the apparatus (1990 WB-40 –straight dual rear
axle design).The building will need fire sprinkler and standpipe coverage as well.
13. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to address those of the Fire Chief’s
comments that pertain to site design prior to closing the hearing.The proposed building
will be sprinklered. We have attached supplemental information in the form of an
Ms.Marla KeenePage7of9
September 21, 2022
AutoTurn generated worksheet (F1.0)depicting the turning movement around the
building as well as the proposed FDC location.
14. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to provide one additional short term
bicycle parking space, unless the outcome of the above discussion regarding uses results in a
different configuration.One additional space has been added to the plans.
15.It is not clear whether this criterion is met.Staff recommends the Board require the
applicant to provide a computation demonstrating compliance with this criterion prior
to closing the hearing.In case the northeastern spaces associated with the storage
area are converted to parking spaces,we developed a plan showing the 10% green
spaces compliance. This is attached as Sheet WS-1.0.The current application has
reduced the number of parking spaces to 23 which negates the need to
demonstrate compliance with the 10% internal green space requirement.
16. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to better distribute the shade trees, and
add two additional shade trees, prior to closing the hearing. Staff considers there will
opportunities for reconfiguring and adding shade trees when the eastern driveway is
modified to align with the driveway on the other side of Bowdoin Street, and there is an
opportunity for providing a shade tree along the southern driveway.The applicant has
retained Cynthia Knauf Landscape Architect to craft the existing landscaping plan.
17. Some of the trees are measured in height, not caliper. Staff recommends the Board discuss
with the applicant that they will need to provide trees that are at least two and one-half
inches in caliper at installation, regardless of how they are considered by the nursery, and
include this as a condition of approval.The Landscaping Schedule on the landscaping
sheet shows that the minimum caliper is 2.5”.
18. Snow storage does not appear to be shown on the plans. Staff recommends the Board
require the applicant to show snow storage on the plans, or to direct the Board as to where
it is shown.The proposed snow storage areas have been added to the revised Sheet L1.1.
19. Since the applicant has not met the required minimum landscaping budget with trees and
shrubs (discussed immediately below), Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to
improve compliance with this criterion along Meadowland Drive and in the required site
amenity prior to allowing credit for perennials and ornamental grasses.The proposed plan
meets the landscaping obligations.
20. The required minimum landscaping budget is $41,750 for an estimated project cost of
$3,425,000. Staff notes that landscaping budget is required for the full value of initial fit-up,
and recommends the Board clarify with the applicant whether the estimated project cost
includes full interior fit up or only the fit-up shown on the provided floor plans. If full fit-up is
Ms.Marla KeenePage8of9
September 21, 2022
not included, additional landscaping budget will be required at a later date. Staff notes the
applicant may over-landscape now and apply the excess landscaping as value towards
future initial fit-up. Otherwise a site plan amendment will be required at the time of fit-up of
additional areas.
13.05 Stormwater Management
Stormwater standards apply when one-half acre or more of impervious surface exists
or is proposed to exist,and where 5,000 sf of impervious is created or reconstructed.
The City Stormwater Section reviewed the proposed plans on 5/31/2022 and offers the
following comments.
1.The proposed project is located in the Potash Brook watershed.
2.The project proposes to create greater than 1 acre of impervious area and disturb
greater than 1 acre of land.
3.The cover letter provided with the application indicates that underground detentionchambersareproposedforstormwatertreatment.While the applicant has considered Tier1stormwater treatment practices as infeasible,the applicant is required to consider Tier 2stormwater treatment practices,in accordance with the Vermont StormwaterManagementManual.4.The proposed 12”HDPE storm drain from CB#7 is shown connecting into an existingcatchbasinatelevation339.9’.The applicant should make sure this pipe has adequatecover.
5.DHM#7 is missing a rim elevation.
6.Silt fence on Sheet C3.0 is called out with “turn-outs”.Applicant should confirm if “j-
hook” is a better terminology for what is proposed.The maximum drainage area for
overland flow to a silt fence shall not exceed ¼acre per 100 feet of fence.
21. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to address the comments of the CityStormwaterSectionpriortoclosingthehearing.We have addressed Items 4-6.We askthat the Board defer to the State of Vermont’s technical review of the currently pendingoperational stormwater permit application. The applicant is acceptable to a condition ofapproval that the State GP 3-9050 authorization be produced prior to the issuance ofZoning Permit for the project.
22.The applicant is proposing a number of wall mounted fixtures that are not in proximity to
doors or to areas which will be used for access.While these fixtures are not prohibited,
Staff recommends the Board discuss with the applicant why they are proposed, as the
City’s lighting standards tend to favor less lighting over more.These have been removed
from the project.
23.The applicant is proposing to use the six north eastern most parking spaces as outdoor
storage.Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to update all plans to reflect
this area as outdoor storage.This reduces the number of required shade trees and affects
the computation of required interior parking lot landscaping.Updates to those
landscaping elements should be made simultaneously with updates to reflect the outdoor
Ms.Marla KeenePage9of9
September 21, 2022
storage area.We have added the proposed outdoor storage area on the plans. The
interior parking green space is no longer a requirement with 23 spaces. If the storage is
converted back then demonstration of compliance with the interior green space
requirement will need to be met.
24.The applicant is proposing to enclose the area with a six to seven foot chain link fence
with plastic slats.Staff recommends the Board require the aforementioned plan updates
to reflect the proposed fence type.This callout may be found on Sheet C2.1
This completes our general summary of the current status of the revisions made
proposed project application materials.If you should have any questions, please
feel free to contact me at 864-2323 x310.
Respectfully,
David S. Marshall, P.E.
Project Engineer
Attachments:
Site Plan Application Package
Site Plan Application (1 digital copyApplication Fee of $1877.50 ($275 Base Fee +$13 +10,000 SF x 0.10 + 11,790 SF x $0.05/SF))Paid
Adjoiner ListSite Plan Submittal Summary
IO District Design StandardsTraffic Impact StudySite Lighting Cuts
Natural Resource MappingFlood Plain & River Corridor
FEMA FirmetteANR Atlas Wetland MappingHabitat Blocks
ANR Atlas Slopes Mapping
FAA PermitW&S Design Flows SummaryVPZ–HRN Worksheet
Wetland Evaluation Form
cc:(All w/ enclosures, 11x17 plans);M. Neagley CEA File 19145.00
P:\AutoCADD Projects\2019\19145\3-Permitting\1-Local Applications\4-Site Plan\0 -Keene -Lot 7 MBP Site Plan Cover Letter 220921.rtf
FIRST FLOOR0' - 0"
HIGH ROOF22' - 0"
LOW ROOF14' - 0"
MEZZANINE12' - 0"
METL SPAN SLATE GRAY
METL SPAN TERRACOTTA METL SPAN COPPER METALLIC
FIRST FLOOR0' - 0"
HIGH ROOF22' - 0"
LOW ROOF14' - 0"
MEZZANINE12' - 0"
METL SPAN TERRACOTTA
KAWNEER SUN SHADES
METL SPAN SLATE GRAY
METAL SPAN COPPER METALLIC
FIRST FLOOR0' - 0"
HIGH ROOF22' - 0"
MEZZANINE12' - 0"
METL SPAN SLATE GRAY
METL SPAN TERRACOTTA
FIRST FLOOR0' - 0"
HIGH ROOF22' - 0"
LOW ROOF14' - 0"
MEZZANINE12' - 0"
METL SPAN SLATE GRAY METL SPAN COPPER MAETALLIC project name:sheet title:
sheet no.
scale:
project no.
checked by:
drawn by:
proj. date:
sheet date:project address:P 802.879.51537 CARMICHAEL ST. ESSEX JUNCTION, VT 05452SCOTTPARTNERS.COMF 802.872.2764 1/8" = 1'-0"9/21/2022 1:05:00 PMS:\1-S+P-Projects\1-COMMERCIAL\Neagley-Chase Offices 2022\Drawings\Revit\2022.09.21_NCC Office_R23.rvtNEAGLEY & CHASE NEWOFFICESProject Number
JBA
JN
Issue Date
EXTERIORELEVATIONS
A4.009/21/2022 ZONING
DRAWINGS_NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION Enter address here09/21/2022
1/8" = 1'-0"1North
1/8" = 1'-0"2South
1/8" = 1'-0"3East
1/8" = 1'-0"4West
No Date Revisions
1
REF.UP
REF.100' - 0"75' - 0"
125' - 0"30' - 0"5' - 6"72 SF
VESTIBULE
101
752 SF
LOBBY
102
15' - 5 1/2"12' - 6"12' - 6"12' - 6"12' - 6"13' - 2 1/2"20' - 6"
234 SF
PRESIDENT
105 234 SF
CEO
106
234 SF
VP
107
234 SF
BD
108
237 SF
ACCOUNTING
109
311 SF
PE
110
142 SF
PM5
111
142 SF
PM4
112
142 SF
PM3
113
142 SF
PM2
114
142 SF
PM1
115
163 SF
EST
116
207 SF
BID/EST
117
3091 SF
SHOP
118
423 SF
CONFERENCE
ROOM
119 5' - 0"7' - 0"252 SF
STORAGE
120 62 SF
BATHROOM
122
228 SF
COPIER/PRINTER
123
40 SF
IT
124
53 SF
JC
125
156 SF
KITCHEN
126
443 SF
LOADING DOCK
127
MEZZANINE ABOVE
EXIT
EXIT
302 SF
OFFICE MAN.
RECEPTION
128
DISPLAY-GALLERY
52 SF
BATHROOM
121
6' - 6"6' - 0"16' - 0"141 SF
EST
132
8' - 10"6' - 7"6' - 9 1/2"6' - 9 1/2"
47 SF
BATHROOM
134 6' - 0"145 SF
SMALL
CONFERENCEROOM
137
163 SF
OFFICE
138
182 SF
OFFICE
139
56 SF
SHOP BATHROOM
140
PLOTTER
WORK COUNTER STORAGE/MAIL 14' - 9 1/2"11' - 6"11' - 2 1/2"12' - 5 1/2"5' - 1"9' - 6"9' - 6"9' - 6"9' - 6"9' - 6"9' - 6"EXIT
MIN.
1' - 6"
CANOPY ABOVE
LOADING DOCKS, LANDINGS, STAIRS AND WALKS - SEE CIVIL/STRUCTURAL
SIDEWALK TO
DRIVEWAY (PUBLIC WAY)
METAL STAIRS, 7" RISERS CONC. FILLED PANS. MTL HANDRAIL BOTH SIDES.
26' - 6"
PATIO SEE CIVIL88' - 0"18' - 0"734 SF
MECHANICALROOM
130
119 SF
OFFICE
131
OPEN TO SHOP
BELOW
MEZZANINE 10 PERSON MAX (TOTAL OFFICE SPACE = 780 SF)
118 SF
OFFICE
135505 SF
OPEN OFFICE
136
42" HIGH GUARDRAIL WITH 4' REMOVABLE SECTION. project name:sheet title:
sheet no.
scale:
project no.
checked by:
drawn by:
proj. date:
sheet date:project address:P 802.879.51537 CARMICHAEL ST. ESSEX JUNCTION, VT 05452SCOTTPARTNERS.COMF 802.872.2764 1/8" = 1'-0"9/21/2022 1:04:46 PMS:\1-S+P-Projects\1-COMMERCIAL\Neagley-Chase Offices 2022\Drawings\Revit\2022.09.21_NCC Office_R23.rvtNEAGLEY & CHASE NEWOFFICESProject Number
JBA
JN
Issue Date
PROPOSED PLAN
A2.009/21/2022 ZONING
DRAWINGS_NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION Enter address here09/21/2022
1/8" = 1'-0"1FIRST FLOOR PROPOSED PLAN
1/8" = 1'-0"2MEZZANINE
EXIT
No Date Revisions
D REXISTING
HOUSE
EXISTING
GARAGE
390
388
386390
390
390
396397
399 393
392391390
391
391
391395395
391
393394
389387388
389
386
385
387
385 384 MEA
D
O
W
L
A
N
D
D
R
I
V
EFM
388
384
395
394
393
392
393
396
392
398
391
394
394 395
395
390
391
392
393394395396397
356
355
35
0 360347
346346 357356
359347348350351
353352 355
34334
7
348
34
9 351358359355
356355356357354
352354
354
353349347346.4346355355
353
354
353
358352
354
35
8
346
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D D
D
D
D
D
n/f
GRANDVIEW
FARM, LLC
n/f
GPT
PROPERTIES
TRUST
n/f
CHASE PROPERTIES
n/f
NEAGLEY & CHASE
CONSTRUCTION
n/f
NORTHEAST
TERRITORIES, INC.
n/f
GREENFIELD
CAPITOL, LLC
n/f
MEADOWLANDS
BUSINESS COMPLEX
CONDOMINIUMS, LLC
n/f
GREENFIELD
CAPITOL, LLC
n/f
SBRC PROPERTIES,
LLC
n/f
BURLINGTON
PROPERTIES LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
n/f
THE ROCK OF
GREATER
BURLINGTON INC.
n/f
SUPERTEMP
REALTY, LLC
n/f
BURLINGTON
PROPERTIES LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
1" = 150'C1.0
OVERALL
SITE PLAN
1.UTILITIES SHOWN DO NOT PURPORT TO CONSTITUTE OR REPRESENT ALL UTILITIES LOCATED UPON OR ADJACENT TO THE SURVEYED
PREMISES. EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL UTILITY CONFLICTS. ALL
DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT DIG SAFE (888-344-7233) PRIOR TO ANY
CONSTRUCTION.
2.ALL EXISTING UTILITIES NOT INCORPORATED INTO THE FINAL DESIGN SHALL BE REMOVED OR ABANDONED AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS
OR DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.
3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS (WITH TIES) FOR ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THOSE PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED
TO THE OWNER AT THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT.
4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR/RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS (ON OR OFF THE SITE) AS A DIRECT OR INDIRECT RESULT OF THE
CONSTRUCTION.
5.ALL GRASSED AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL FULL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED.
6.MAINTAIN ALL TREES OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS.
7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE AND OPERABLE FACILITIES AND UTILITIES.
8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ALL ITEMS AND MATERIALS INCORPORATED INTO THE SITE WORK. WORK SHALL
NOT BEGIN ON ANY ITEM UNTIL SHOP DRAWING APPROVAL IS GRANTED.
9.IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIREMENTS SET IN THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE WORK IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALL PERMIT CONDITIONS AND ANY LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS STANDARDS.
10.THE TOLERANCE FOR FINISH GRADES FOR ALL PAVEMENT, WALKWAYS AND LAWN AREAS SHALL BE 0.1 FEET.
11.ANY DEWATERING NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE SITEWORK SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF THE CONTRACT AND SHALL
BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY.
12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITHIN TOWN ROAD R.O.W. WITH TOWN AUTHORITIES.
13.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE ELECTRICAL, CABLE AND TELEPHONE SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES
REQUIREMENTS.
14.EXISTING PAVEMENT AND TREE STUMPS TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT AN APPROVED OFF-SITE LOCATION. ALL PAVEMENT
CUTS SHALL BE MADE WITH A PAVEMENT SAW.
15.IF THERE ARE ANY CONFLICTS OR INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE PLANS OR SPECIFICATIONS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE
ENGINEER FOR VERIFICATION BEFORE WORK CONTINUES ON THE ITEM IN QUESTION.
16.PROPERTY LINE INFORMATION IS APPROXIMATE AND BASED ON EXISTING TAX MAP INFORMATION. THIS PLAN IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY
AND IS NOT INTENDED TO BE USED AS ONE.
17.IF THE BUILDING IS TO BE SPRINKLERED, BACKFLOW PREVENTION SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWWA M14. THE SITE
CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT THE WATER LINE TO TWO FEET ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR. SEE MECHANICAL PLANS FOR RISER
DETAIL.
18.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICES INDICATED IN THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS,
TYPICAL FOR CONCRETE AND SOIL TESTING.
19.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL LAYOUT AND FIELD ENGINEERING REQUIRED FOR COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. CIVIL
ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES WILL PROVIDE AN AUTOCAD FILE WHERE APPLICABLE.
20.THE OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ANY AND ALL SAFETY FENCES OR RAILS ABOVE EXISTING AND PROPOSED
WALLS. THE OWNER SHALL VERIFY LOCAL, STATE AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENT GUIDELINES FOR THE INSTALLATION AND VERIFY ANY
AND ALL PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS.
GENERAL NOTES
PROJECT
LOCATION
DSM
DSM
SAL
19145
APR. 7, 2022
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
NORTHEAST
TERRITORIES, INC.
20 SOUTH CREST
BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOT 7
MEADOWLAND
BUSINESS PARK
SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT
NEAGLEY & CHASE
CONSTRUCTION
66 BOWDOIN ST., STE. 100
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOCATION MAP
1" = 2000'
PROJECT
LOCATION
116
89HINESBURG ROADME
A
D
O
W
L
A
N
D
D
R
MEADOWLAND DR.BOWDOIN ST.THOMPSON ST.RAN
D
ALL
ST.
KNOLL CIR.
NEAGLEY & CHASE
OFFICE BUILDING
9/21/22 DSM REVISED SITE LAYOUT
P:\AutoCADD Projects\2019\19145\1-CADD Files-\dwg\19145 - Site.dwg, 9/21/2022 1:44:47 PM
SSSSSSSS
S
S S
S
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
STEEESSSSSETCETCETCETC
ETCST
SETCETCETCETCETCETCSTG
G
GGGGGGGG WWWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WWWWWW
W
EX. HYDRANT
W
W
W
ST
STW
8" D.I.W36' OF 8" D.I. WATER SERVICE
W/ CAP & THRUST BLOCK
SSSSSSWWWWWWWWW
W
W
W
W W W
ST
ST
ST
S
S
S
S
D
D
G G15" HDPE
15" HDPE EXISTING STORM WATER PONDS
S
S
S
S
S
EX. CB
RIM 341.3
INV. 338.6 (4" E)
INV. 336.9 (18"
N)
EX.
UTILITY
CABINET
(TYP.)
18" HDPE w/
F.E.S.
INV. 335.8
18" HDPE
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
EX. CB
RIM 347.7
EX. CB
RIM 347.7
18" HDPE
EX. 8" WATER
SERVICE
INV. UNKNOWN
APPROX. LOCATION
8" PVC SEWER SERV.
INV. UNKNOWN 8" D.I. WATER MAIN10" D.I. WATER MAIN
76'X3'X6' CONCRETE BOX CULVERT8" PVC
8" PVC
8" PVC
EX. SMH
RIM 346.3
INV. 335.5 (CL)
EX. SMH
RIM 340.3
INV. 332.6 (CL)
SEWER SERV.18" HDPEBOWDOIN ST.MEADOWLAND DR.THOMPSON ST.APPROXIMATE LIMITS
OF SOIL STOCKPILE
50' SETBACK 50' SETBACK35' SETBACK
351350350350349349348348348348347347347347346346
34634534
5 345344
3443
4
4
344343
3433
4
3
343
342
3423
4
2
342
341
341341341
340
340
339
339
338
338
337
337336SIGNSPRING?WET
8" OAK
8" OAK8" OAK
8" MAPLE
8" MAPLE
8" MAPLE
(2) WATER DIG SAFE
MARKINGS
4" SPRUCE
2" SPRUCE
2" SPRUCE
4" SPRUCE
(3) 4" SPRUCE
(2) 4" SPRUCE
4" SPRUCE
4" SPRUCE
(3) 4" SPRUCE
4" SPRUCE
2" SPRUCE
2" SPRUCE
CMF
FLUCH
58" CRF
FLUCH
58" CRF
FLUSH(4) 6" FIR
2" FIR
EX. CB
RIM 341.4
INV. 339.3
(4" E)
INV. 336.3
(18" E)
INV. 336.3
(18" S)
INV. 336.2
(18" NW)340338339349345
346
339 341
4" LINDEN
4" LINDEN
4" LINDEN
4" LINDEN
4" LINDEN
2" SPRUCE
710.87'
715.19'230.22'230.51'LOT 7
3.96 AC.
TREE REMOVAL (TYP.)8" D.I.2" LOCUST
DSM
DSM
SAL
1" = 30'
19145
C1.1
EXISTING
CONDITIONS SITE
PLAN
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
NORTHEAST
TERRITORIES, INC.
20 SOUTH CREST
BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOT 7
MEADOWLAND
BUSINESS PARK
SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT
NEAGLEY & CHASE
CONSTRUCTION
66 BOWDOIN ST., STE. 100
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOCATION MAP
1" = 2000'
PROJECT
LOCATION
89
116
NEAGLEY & CHASE
OFFICE BUILDING
APR. 7, 2022
6/27/22 DSM REVISED WETLAND DELINEATION
P:\AutoCADD Projects\2019\19145\1-CADD Files-\dwg\19145 - Site.dwg, 9/21/2022 12:24:54 PM
SSSSSSSS
S
S
S
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
STEEESSSSSETCETCETCETC
ETCS
T
SS
ETCETCETCETCETCETCETCSTSTETC
G
G
GGGGGGGG WWWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WWWWWWW
W
W
W
STST
STSTWW
350
350
350
350
35
0
35
0
34
0
340340
340
STST SSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W W W
ST
ST
ST
ST
E
UTS S
S
S
S
S
D
G GGS
S
S
S
S
S
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
GBOWDOIN ST.MEADOWLAND DR.THOMPSON ST.50' SETBACK 50' SETBACK35' SETBACK
PROPOSED BUILDING
11,317 SF
F.F.E. 348.0
351350350350349349348348348348347347347347346346
34634534
5 345344
3443
4
4
344343
3433
4
3
343
342
3423
4
2
342
341
341341341
340
340
339
339
338
338
337
337336340338339349345
346
339 341
710.87'
715.19'230.22'230.51'LOT 7
3.96 AC.
D
D
D
D
DSM
DSM
SAL
1" = 30'
19145
C2.0
PROPOSED
CONDITIONS
OVERALL SITE
PLAN
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
NORTHEAST
TERRITORIES, INC.
20 SOUTH CREST
BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOT 7
MEADOWLAND
BUSINESS PARK
SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT
NEAGLEY & CHASE
CONSTRUCTION
66 BOWDOIN ST., STE. 100
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOCATION MAP
1" = 2000'
PROJECT
LOCATION
116
89
NEAGLEY & CHASE
OFFICE BUILDING
APR. 7, 2022
6/8/22 DSM REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS
9/21/22 DSM REVISED SITE LAYOUT
P:\AutoCADD Projects\2019\19145\1-CADD Files-\dwg\19145 - Site.dwg, 9/21/2022 1:43:12 PM
SSSSSSSS S
S
S
S
S
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
STST
S
T
SETCETCETCETCETCETCETCETCS
T
STST
WWWWWWWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WWWWWW
W
W
W
W
S
D
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
GBOWDOIN ST.MEADOWLAND DR.
5
PROPOSED BUILDING
11,317 SF
F.F.E. 348.0
PROPOSED
SWALE
50'
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
EXISTING BIT. CONC. SHA
R
E
D
U
S
E
P
A
T
H EXISTING 5' BIT. CONC. SIDEWALK
30.7' SETBACK
(WAIVER OF 19.3')
40.1' SETBACK
(WAIVER OF 9.9')
10" CONC.
RETAINING
WALL
DUMPSTER
ENCLOSURE
351350350350349349348348348348347347347347346346
34634534
5 345344
3443
4
4
344343
3433
4
3
343
342
3423
4
2
342
341
341341341
340
340
339
339
338
338
337
337T T340338339
349345
346
339 341
2' TAPERED CURB
6' TAPERED CURB
2' TAPERED
CURB
30'20'
FIRE DEPT.
CONNECTION 346345RT348348349347347348349349347LOT 7
3.96 AC.
PROPOSED OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA - 6-7'
HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCING WITH PLASTIC
SLAT INSERTS AND DOUBLE GATE
612
BIKE RACK
ACCESSIBLE
PARKING
SIGN
6' TAPERED
CURB
6' TAPERED
CURB (TYP.)22'9'(TYP.)18' (TYP.)
60'60'NEW SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL
2
0
'348347346345
346
347346
345
34
5
346
347
346
346
343
345
3463455' CONCRETE
SIDEWALK (TYP.)100.3'SNOW
STORAGE
SNOW
STORAGE
SNOW
STORAGE
BOLLARD
BOLLARD
347
PATIO
DSM
DSM
SAL
1" = 20'
19145
C2.1
PROPOSED SITE
IMPROVEMENTS
PLAN
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
NORTHEAST
TERRITORIES, INC.
20 SOUTH CREST
BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOT 7
MEADOWLAND
BUSINESS PARK
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
NEAGLEY & CHASE
CONSTRUCTION
66 BOWDOIN ST., STE. 100
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOCATION MAP
1" = 2000'
PROJECT
LOCATION
116
89
NEAGLEY & CHASE
OFFICE BUILDING
APR. 7, 2022
6/8/22 DSM REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS
9/21/22 DSM REVISED SITE LAYOUT
30% (MAX.)FRONT YARD COVERAGE
ZONING DISTRICT: INDUSTRIAL OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
DIMENSIONAL SUMMARY
-
3.0 AC.
REQ'D.
LOT FRONTAGE
LOT AREA
PROPOSED
3.96 AC.
BUILD. COVERAGE
LOT COVERAGE
30% (MAX.)
50% (MAX.)
100.3'
FRONT SETBACK
SIDE SETBACK
50'
35'
35'REAR SETBACK N/A
17.6%
6.6%
MEADOWLAND DRIVE 715'
BOWDOIN STREET 253'
MEADOWLAND DRIVE 11.9%
BOWDOIN STREET 29.8%
THOMPSON STREET 230'
MEADOWLAND DRIVE 30.7'
BOWDOIN STREET 40.1'
THOMPSON STREET 545.5'P:\AutoCADD Projects\2019\19145\1-CADD Files-\dwg\19145 - Site.dwg, 9/21/2022 1:46:35 PM
SSSSSSSSSSSTS S
S
S
S
S
S
SETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
S
T
SETCETCETCETCETCETCETCETCETC
ST
S
T
STST
WWWWWWWWWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
S
S
D
S
EX. CB
RIM 341.3
INV. 338.6 (4" E)
INV. 336.9 (18" N)
18" HDPE w/ F.E.S.
INV. 335.8
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
EX. CB
RIM 347.7
EX. CB
RIM 347.7
18" HDPE
18" HDPEBOWDOIN ST.MEADOWLAND DR.
PROPOSED BUILDING
11,317 SF
F.F.E. 348.0
ROOF DRAIN
CONNECTION
INV. 342.2
50'
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
EXISTING BIT. CONC. SHA
R
E
D
U
S
E
P
A
T
H EXISTING 5' BIT. CONC. SIDEWALK
CB #5
RIM 343.9
INV. 341.9 (12" N)
INV. 342.0 (8" S)351350350350349349348348348348347347347347346346
34634534
5 345344
3443
4
4
344343
3433
4
3
343
342
3423
4
2
342
341
341341341
340
340
339
339
338
338
337
3373368" OAK
8" OAK
8" OAK
8" MAPLE
8" MAPLE
4" SPRUCE
2" SPRUCE
2" SPRUCE
4" SPRUCE
(3) 4" SPRUCE
(2) 4" SPRUCE
4" SPRUCE
4" SPRUCE
(3) 4" SPRUCE
4" SPRUCE
2" SPRUCE
2" SPRUCE
(4) 6" FIR
2" FIR
EX. CB
RIM 341.4
INV. 339.3 (4" E)
INV. 336.3 (18" E)
INV. 336.3 (18" S)
INV. 336.2 (18" NW)
8 L.F. - 8" HDPE
(PLACE 2" RIGID
INSULATION
OVER PIPE)
T T340338339
349345
346
339 341
4" LINDEN
4" LINDEN
4" LINDEN
4" LINDEN
2" SPRUCE
+ 347.9 344.0 +TC 347.7
BC 347.2
+346345RT5.0%348348349347347348349349347LOT 7
3.96 AC.
EX. CB
RIM 351.8
INV. 346.2 (18" W)
D
D
D
ST
D
STS
S
ETC
ETC
W
W
CB #1
RIM 343.9
INV. 339.0 (15" N)
INV. 342.1 (12" NE)
INV. 338.9 (18" E)
INV. 338.8 (18" W)
ST
CB #3
RIM 344.2
INV. 340.8 (15" SE)
CB #4
RIM 344.8
INV. 340.9 (12" E)
INV. 340.8 (12" SW)
DMH #3
RIM 347.0
INV. 341.7 (12" S)
INV. 341.6 (12" W)
DMH #2
RIM 345.9
INV. 340.5 (15" NE)
INV. 340.5 (15" NW)
INV. 340.9 (12" E)
INV. 340.4 (15" S)
DMH #1
RIM 346.8
INV. 340.4 (15" N)
INV. 340.4 (12" W)
INV. 340.3 (15" S)
TREATMENT UNIT
RIM 346.9
INV. 340.1 (15" N)
INV. 339.5 (15" S)64 L.F.
15" HDPE
10 L.F. -
15" HDPE
13 L.F. 15" HDPE
21 L.F. 15" HDPE
9 L.F. 12" HDPE
87 L.F. 12" HDPE
TC 348.6
BC 348.1
+
+
347.96
+
TC 347.5
BC 347.5
+
347.3
+
347.75
TC 347.9
BC 347.4
+
+
TC 346.4
BC 345.9
+
TC 346.8
BC 346.3
348.7
+
+
348.0+
347.3
+
TC 345.9
BC 345.4
TC 347.1
BC 346.6
+
+
346.0
+
347.2
TC 347.4
BC 346.9
+
+
347.2 347.5
+
+
TC 347.6
BC 347.1
TC 347.0
BC 346.5
+
TC 346.5
BC 346.0
+
+
TC 345.1
BC 344.6
TC 345.9
BC 345.4
+
+
TC 346.0
BC 345.5
TC 346.4
BC 345.9
+
+ 346.6347.0
+
+
347.2
346.0
+345.0
+346.0
+347.0
+
90 L.F.
12" HDPE
CB #2
RIM 345.5
INV. 343.0 (12" SW)
TC 347.2
BC 346.7
+348347346345
346
347346
345
34
5
346
TC 345.5
BC 345.0
+
TC 348.2
BC 347.7
+
347
346
346
T/WALL EL. 347.0
343
345
346345WETLAND BUFFER
IMPACT - 1,020 S.F.
346.5
+
347.96
+347.7
+
347.45
+
347.5
+
347.6
+
347.75
++
347.6
+
347.0
346.8
+
347.3
+
348.9±
+349.3
+
348.0
+
+
344.5
TC 346.7
BC 346.7
+
TC 346.8
BC 346.8
+
+
346.3
TC 347.1
BC 346.6
+
347
GDSM
DSM
SAL
1" = 20'
19145
C2.2
PROPOSED
CONDITIONS
GRADING &
DRAINAGE PLAN
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
NORTHEAST
TERRITORIES, INC.
20 SOUTH CREST
BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOT 7
MEADOWLAND
BUSINESS PARK
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
NEAGLEY & CHASE
CONSTRUCTION
66 BOWDOIN ST., STE. 100
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOCATION MAP
1" = 2000'
PROJECT
LOCATION
116
89
NEAGLEY & CHASE
OFFICE BUILDING
APR. 7, 2022
6/8/22 DSM REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS
9/21/22 DSM REVISED SITE LAYOUT
P:\AutoCADD Projects\2019\19145\1-CADD Files-\dwg\19145 - Site.dwg, 9/21/2022 1:37:28 PM
SSSSSSSSSSSTS S
S
S
S
S
S
SETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
S
T
SETCETCETCETCETCETCETCETCETC
ST
S
T
STST
WWWWWWWWWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
S
S
D
S
EX. UTILITY
CABINET
(TYP.)
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
EX. 8" WATER SERVICE
INV. UNKNOWN
APPROX. LOCATION
8" PVC SEWER SERV.
INV. UNKNOWN 8" D.I. WATER MAIN10" D.I. WATER MAIN
8" PVC
8" PVC
EX. SMH
RIM 346.3
INV. 335.5 (CL)
EX. SMH
RIM 340.3
INV. 332.6 (CL)BOWDOIN ST.MEADOWLAND DR.
PROPOSED BUILDING
11,317 SF
F.F.E. 348.0
50'
W
E
T
L
A
N
D
B
U
F
F
E
R
EXISTING BIT. CONC. SHA
R
E
D
U
S
E
P
A
T
H EXISTING 5' BIT. CONC. SIDEWALK
PROPOSED
HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY 351350350350349349348348348348347347347347346346
34634534
5 345344
3443
4
4
344343
3433
4
3
343
342
3423
4
2
342
341
341341341
340
340
339
339
338
338
337
3373368" OAK
8" OAK
8" OAK
8" MAPLE
8" MAPLE
(2) WATER DIG SAFE
MARKINGS
4" SPRUCE
2" SPRUCE
2" SPRUCE
4" SPRUCE
(3) 4" SPRUCE
(2) 4" SPRUCE
4" SPRUCE
4" SPRUCE
(3) 4" SPRUCE
4" SPRUCE
2" SPRUCE
2" SPRUCE
(4) 6" FIR
2" FIR
T T
PROPOSED
SPRINKLER
ROOM
±138 L.F. - 6" SDR 35 PV
C
(2% MIN. SLOPE)
115 L.F.
-
8
"
C
9
0
0
P
V
C340338339
349345
346
339 341
4" LINDEN
4" LINDEN
4" LINDEN
4" LINDEN
2" SPRUCE
NEW GATE VALVE
AND VALVE BOX 346345RT348348349347347348349349347LOT 7
3.96 AC.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
CONNECTION
98.7'
2" TYPE 'K' DOMESTIC
SERVICE w/ 2" GATE
VALVE & VALVE BOX
8" D.I.6" CL 52
D.I.P.
8"x6" TEE
C.O.
PROPOSED ELEC., TEL.
& CABLE SERVICE
D
D
D
ST
D
STS
S
C.O.C.O.
C.O.
ETC
ETC
W
W
ST 348347346345
346
347346
345
34
5
346
347
346
346
343
345
346345347
CONTRACTOR SHALL
CONFIRM EX. PIPE SIZE
PRIOR TO CONNECTION GDSM
DSM
SAL
1" = 20'
19145
C2.3
PROPOSED
CONDITIONS
UTILITY PLAN
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
NORTHEAST
TERRITORIES, INC.
20 SOUTH CREST
BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOT 7
MEADOWLAND
BUSINESS PARK
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
NEAGLEY & CHASE
CONSTRUCTION
66 BOWDOIN ST., STE. 100
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOCATION MAP
1" = 2000'
PROJECT
LOCATION
116
89
NEAGLEY & CHASE
OFFICE BUILDING
ALL WATER LINES AND APPURTENANCES SHALL BE
INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHAMPLAIN WATER
DISTRICT SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS FOR THE
INSTALLATION OF WATER LINES AND APPURTENANCES,
CURRENT EDITION, HENCEFORTH THE CWD SPECIFICATIONS.
RECORD DRAWINGS PREPARED BY A VERMONT LICENSED
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE
SOUTH BURLINGTON WATER DEPT. IN PDF AND AUTOCAD
FORMAT. DRAWING SHALL INCLUDE TIES TO ALL GATE
VALVES AND CURB STOPS TO SUB-METER ACCURACY.
APR. 7, 2022
4/28/22 DSM REVISED PER CWD COMMENTS
6/8/22 DSM REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS
9/21/22 DSM REVISED SITE LAYOUT
P:\AutoCADD Projects\2019\19145\1-CADD Files-\dwg\19145 - Site.dwg, 9/21/2022 1:37:41 PM
SSSSSSS
S
S
S
S
S
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
STST
S
T
SETCETCETCETCETCETCETCS
T
ST
WWWWWWWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WWWWW
S
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
GBOWDOIN ST.MEADOWLAND DR.
PROPOSED BUILDING
11,317 SF
F.F.E. 348.0
EXISTING BIT. CONC. SHA
R
E
D
U
S
E
P
A
T
H EXISTING 5' BIT. CONC. SIDEWALK351350350350349349348348348348347347347347346346
34634534
5 345344
3443
4
4
344343
3433
4
3
343
342
3423
4
2
342
341
341341341
340
340
339
339
338
3378" OAK
8" OAK
8" OAK
8" MAPLE
8" MAPLE
2" SPRUCE
(3) 4" SPRUCE
(2) 4" SPRUCE
4" SPRUCE
4" SPRUCE
(3) 4" SPRUCE
4" SPRUCE
2" SPRUCE
2" SPRUCE
(4) 6" FIR
2" FIR
T T340338339
349345
346
339 341
4" LINDEN
4" LINDEN
4" LINDEN
2" SPRUCE
RTD
D
D
D
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.5
1.3
1.1
0.9
0.9
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.3
0.6
1.0
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.6
1.9
1.7
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.7
1.1
1.3
0.2
0.3
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.8
1.0
1.4
1.5
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.6
1.1
1.3
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.9
0.8
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.7
1.9
2.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.6
0.9
2.4
4.3
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.9
3.0
4.4
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.8
1.0
1.1
2.3
3.9
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.6
0.8
0.8
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.7
1.1
1.3
0.6
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.8
1.3
1.4
0.7
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.3
1.3
0.6
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.9
1.2
1.4
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.5
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.1
1.2
1.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.6
0.9
1.4
1.6
0.7
1.0
1.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.6
1.0
1.5
1.3
1.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.5
0.9
1.4
1.3
0.5
0.3
1.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.5
0.8
1.3
1.3
0.5
0.5
1.1
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.5
0.9
1.3
1.4
0.9
0.9
2.2
3.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.5
1.1
0.7
2.4
4.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.5
1.4
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.3
0.7
1.1
1.3
1.1
0.9
0.6
P1
P1
W1
W1
W1 P1
P1
DSM
DSM
SAL
1" = 20'
19145
C2.4
PROPOSED
LIGHTING PLAN
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
NORTHEAST
TERRITORIES, INC.
20 SOUTH CREST
BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOT 7
MEADOWLAND
BUSINESS PARK
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
NEAGLEY & CHASE
CONSTRUCTION
66 BOWDOIN ST., STE. 100
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOCATION MAP
1" = 2000'
PROJECT
LOCATION
116
89
NEAGLEY & CHASE
OFFICE BUILDING
APR. 7, 2022
LIGHTING LEVEL LEGEND
LIGHTING CALCULATION SUMMARY
LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE
TYP SYMBOL DESCRIPTION LAMP LUMENS MOUNTING HEIGHT QTY
W1 321W 2310
P1 HUBBLE OUTDOOR LIGHTING
4(1) RAR1-80L-50-4K7-4W-UNV-A-DB-NXSPW_F 50W 6245
WALL - 12.5'
POLE - 22'
HUBBLE OUTDOOR LIGHTING
(1) SG1-20-4K7-FT-UNV-DB-PCU-CS
9/21/22 DSM REVISED SITE LAYOUT
P:\AutoCADD Projects\2019\19145\1-CADD Files-\dwg\19145 - Site.dwg, 9/21/2022 1:42:33 PM
STST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
S
T
ST
S
T
STST
S
S
D
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
PROPOSED BUILDING
11,317 SF
F.F.E. 348.0
351350350350349349348348348348347347347347346346
34634534
5 345344
3443
4
4
344343
3433
4
3
343
342
3423
4
2
342
341
341341341
340
340
339
339
338
338
337
337336T T340338339
349345
346
339 341 346345RT348348349347347348349349347LOT 7
3.96 AC.
D
D
D
ST
D
STS
S
ETC
ETC
ST 348347346345
346
347346
345
34
5
346
347
346
346
343
345
346345 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE OR SWEEP STREET
ON DAILY BASIS
INLET PROTECTION
(TYP. OF 5 PLACES)
PREVENT CONSTRUCTION
FLOWS FROM ENTERING
THE INFILTRATION SYSTEM
DURING CONSTRUCTION
TEMPORARY TREE
PROTECTION (TYP.)
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE OR SWEEP STREET
ON DAILY BASIS
PLACE 4" TOPSOIL. SEED,
FERTILIZE AND EROSION
CONTROL MATTING ON ALL
DISTURBED SURFACES (TYP.)
INSTALL STONE CHECK
DAMS AT 100' INTERVAL
ORANGE CONSTRUCTION
LIMITS TAPE (TYP.)
ORANGE CONSTRUCTION
LIMITS TAPE (TYP.)
PLACE 4" TOPSOIL. SEED,
FERTILIZE AND EROSION
CONTROL MATTING ON ALL
DISTURBED SURFACES (TYP.)
INSTALL SILT FENCE
WITH J-HOOKS (TYP.)
INSTALL SILT FENCE
WITH J-HOOKS (TYP.)
INSTALL SILT FENCE
WITH J-HOOKS (TYP.)
347
GDSM
DSM
SAL
1" = 20'
19145
C3.0
EPSC PLAN
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
NORTHEAST
TERRITORIES, INC.
20 SOUTH CREST
BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOT 7
MEADOWLAND
BUSINESS PARK
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
NEAGLEY & CHASE
CONSTRUCTION
66 BOWDOIN ST., STE. 100
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOCATION MAP
1" = 2000'
PROJECT
LOCATION
116
89
NEAGLEY & CHASE
OFFICE BUILDING
APR. 7, 2022
6/8/22 DSM REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS
9/21/22 DSM REVISED SITE LAYOUT
P:\AutoCADD Projects\2019\19145\1-CADD Files-\dwg\19145 - Site.dwg, 9/21/2022 1:38:06 PM
WWWWWWWWWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
S
S
D
EX. 8" WATER SERVICE
INV. UNKNOWN 8" D.I. WATER MAIN10" D.I. WATER MAIN BOWDOIN ST.MEADOWLAND DR.
PROPOSED BUILDING
11,317 SF
F.F.E. 348.0
PROPOSED
HYDRANT
ASSEMBLY
(2) WATER DIG SAFE
MARKINGS
T T
PROPOSED
SPRINKLER
ROOM
115 L.F.
-
8
"
C
9
0
0
P
V
C
NEW GATE VALVE
AND VALVE BOX RTLOT 7
3.96 AC.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
CONNECTION
98.7'
2" TYPE 'K' DOMESTIC
SERVICE w/ 2" GATE
VALVE & VALVE BOX
8" D.I.6" CL 52
D.I.P.
8"x6" TEE
D
D
D
D
W
W
CONTRACTOR SHALL
CONFIRM EX. PIPE SIZE
PRIOR TO CONNECTION
DSM
DSM
SAL
1" = 20'
19145
F1.0
FIRE DEPARTMENT
ACCESS PLAN
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
NORTHEAST
TERRITORIES, INC.
20 SOUTH CREST
BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOT 7
MEADOWLAND
BUSINESS PARK
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
NEAGLEY & CHASE
CONSTRUCTION
66 BOWDOIN ST., STE. 100
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOCATION MAP
1" = 2000'
PROJECT
LOCATION
116
89
NEAGLEY & CHASE
OFFICE BUILDING
APR. 7, 2022
9/21/22 DSM REVISED SITE LAYOUT
P:\AutoCADD Projects\2019\19145\1-CADD Files-\dwg\19145 - Site.dwg, 9/21/2022 1:42:10 PM
SSSSSSSS
S
S
S
S
S
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ETC
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
ST
STS
T
S
T
SETCETCETCETCETCETCS
T
WWWWWWWWWWW
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
WWWWW
S
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
PROPOSED BUILDING
11,317 SF
F.F.E. 348.0
EXISTING BIT. CONC. SHAR
E
D
U
S
E
P
A
T
H EXISTING 5' BIT. CONC. SIDEWALK351350349348348347347346346
34
5344
3
4
4
3
4
3341339
339
338
337
3378" MAPLE
2" SPRUCE
2" SPRUCE
4" SPRUCE
(3) 4" SPRUCE
(2) 4" SPRUCE
4" SPRUCE
4" SPRUCE
(3) 4" SPRUCE
4" SPRUCE
2" SPRUCE
2" SPRUCE
(4) 6" FIR
T T
3492" SPRUCE
346345RTSTSTSTSTD
D
D
D
STS
S
ETC
ETC
W
W
ST 348347
346
(5) HB
(15) PV
(10) EP
(10) AP
(4) AG
(1) TO
(9) SA
(3) AFA
(17) HQ
(6) PO
(17) HR
(13) AP
JC
AFR
(10) MD
(11) F
(6) JC
(4) IV
(1) JC
(3) IV
(1) JC
(3) JC
AFR
AFR
PATIO
AFR
(3) HB
(4) LM
OVER PERGOLA
(7) HF
(9) HF
DSM
DSM
SAL
1" = 20'
L1.1
SEPT. 21, 2022
PROPOSED
PLANTING PLAN
NORTHEAST
TERRITORIES, INC.
20 SOUTH CREST
BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOT 7
MEADOWLAND
BUSINESS PARK
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
NEAGLEY & CHASE
CONSTRUCTION
66 BOWDOIN ST., STE. 100
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
NEAGLEY & CHASE
OFFICE BUILDING
Snow Storage Area (Typ.)
S
D
BOWDOIN ST.MEADOWLAND DR.
PROPOSED BUILDING
11,317 SF
F.F.E. 348.0
EXISTING BIT. CONC. SHA
R
E
D
U
S
E
P
A
T
H EXISTING 5' BIT. CONC. SIDEWALK
T T
LOT 7
3.96 AC.
DSM
DSM
SAL
1" = 20'
19145
WS1.0
APR. 7, 2022
PARKING LOT
GREEN SPACE
PLAN
A
C
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
E
10 MANSFIELD VIEW LANE, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403
802-864-2323 FAX: 802-864-2271 web: www.cea-vt.com
NORTHEAST
TERRITORIES, INC.
20 SOUTH CREST
BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOT 7
MEADOWLAND
BUSINESS PARK
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
NEAGLEY & CHASE
CONSTRUCTION
66 BOWDOIN ST., STE. 100
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT
LOCATION MAP
1" = 2000'
PROJECT
LOCATION
116
89
ONLOGIC
PARKING LOT GREEN SPACE COMPLIANCE
TOTAL PARKING LOT AREA 13,358 S.F.
GREEN SPACE REQUIRED 1,336 S.F.
GREEN SPACE PROVIDED 1,460 S.F.P:\AutoCADD Projects\2019\19145\1-CADD Files-\dwg\19145 - Site.dwg, 9/21/2022 1:41:53 PM