HomeMy WebLinkAboutDR-12-04 - Decision - 0100 0102 Dorset StreetCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
MASTER SIGNAGE PERMIT #DR-12-04
JUDGE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
100 DORSET STREET & 4 MARKET STREET
FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION
Judge Development Corporation, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking to amend a
previously approved master signage permit. The amendment consists of revisions to the
provisions for freestanding and wall -mounted signs, 100 Dorset Street & 4 Market Street.
Pursuant to Section 6 of the City of South Burlington Sign Ordinance, the erection, alteration, or
relocation of any sign within this district shall require design review by the South Burlington
Design Review Committee (DRC) and Development Review Board (DRB). Section 8 of the Sign
Ordinance requires all property owners within the DS/CC Sign District to obtain a Master
Signage Permit.
Based on testimony provided at the public hearing and the plans and supporting materials
contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds,
concludes, and decides the following:
STATEMENTS OF FACTS
The applicant is seeking to amend a previously approved master sign permit for the
properties at 100 Dorset Street & 4 Market Street.
2. The subject property falls within the Dorset Street/City Center Sign District and is subject to
the South Burlington Sign Ordinance adopted June 3, 2002.
3. The application was received on September 17, 2012.
4. The owner of record of the subject property is Judge Development Corporation.
5. The Development Review Board held a Public Hearing on November 6, 2012. Tim Sullivan
represented the applicant.
6. The applicant has submitted photographs of the existing wall and freestanding signage, as
well as renderings of proposed signage.
DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA
In reviewing an application for signage, Staff has considered the following:
a) Consistent Design
The design of a sign must be compatible and harmonious with the design of buildings on
the subject property and nearby. The design of all signs on a property shall promote
consistency in terms of color, graphic style, lighting, location, material and proportions.
The property contains several distinct buildings, each with different architectural styles and
CAUsers\Mark\Documents\South Burlington DRB\12.4.12 Meeting Decisions\DR_12_04_100Dorset&4Market_Judge_ffd (1).doc
colors. The applicant proposes to establish consistency through common elements among free-
standing signs, among types of wall signs, and among design and colors of wall signs forbusinesseswithoutdirectaccesstotheoutside. The Board finds that the proposed sign
package achieves consistency in graphic style, lighting, material and proportions.
Signs are proposed to be internally illuminated (except for sign type 4). No standalone lighting is
proposed.
Illuminated signs shall be limited to internal illumination.
Per the SB Sign Ordinance, internal illumination is limited to text and graphics only. The
remainder of the body of the sign must be opaque. The proposed sign types are in compliance
with this standard.
b) Promotion of City Center Goals
Signs shall be designed and located in a manner which reinforces and respects the
overall stated goals of the sign district and City Center Plan, including a high aesthetic
quality and pedestrian orientation.
The DRC and DRB find that the proposed signage is of high aesthetic quality and are visually
pleasing. The location (adjacent to the walkways) and size of the signs (less than 32 square feet
for freestanding signs) are oriented towards the pedestrian.
c) Color & Texture
The color and texture of a sign shall be compatible and harmonious with buildings on the
property and nearby. The use of a maximum of three (3) predominant colors is
encouraged to provide consistent foreground, text and background color schemes.
Free-standing signs: the applicant is proposing that freestanding signs be limited to a holly green
opaque background with white translucent copy (text) and graphics. The Board finds this
acceptable.
Wall signs: The applicant proposed six colors for wall -mounted signs: red, blue, green, grey,
black and white. The Board and applicant representative reviewed alternatives. The Board finds
that due to the varied building types throughout the property, wall signs for tenants / business
with direct access to the outside, each individual sign shall be limited to a maximum of three (3)
colors, and that there shall be no limit on the overall number of colors. Wall signs for tenants /
businesses without direct access to the outdoors shall be limited to a holly green opaque
background with white translucent copy (text) and graphics.
Wall signs for tenants / business with direct access to the outside, each individual sign shall be
limited to a maximum of three (3) colors, and that there shall be no limit on the overall number of
colors. Sign casings shall be either black or white. Sign casing colors shall not count towards
the maximum number of colors permitted on a sign.
Wall signs for tenants / businesses without direct access to the outdoors shall be limited to a
holly green opaque background with white translucent copy (text) and graphics.
CAUsers\Mark\Documents\South Burlington DRB\12.4.12 Meeting Decisions\DR_12_04_100Dorset&4Market_Judge_ffd (1).doc 2
Fonts: Due to the varied nature of the buildings on the property, the Board finds that no limitation
on font or font types shall be required.
d) Materials Used- Signs shall be designed and constructed of high -quality materials
complimentary to the materials used in the buildings to which the signs are related
Signs are constructed of steel, aluminum, and plexiglass facing; these materials are
weather -resistant, very commonly used, and appropriate for the district.
The Board finds that the materials are of high -quality and fitting for the urban
environment envisioned in the City Center design district.
Pursuant to Section 20 of the Sign Ordinance, all signs shall be of substantial and sturdy
construction, kept in good repair, and painted or cleaned as necessary to maintain a
clean, safe, and orderly appearance.
The proposed sign package is of substantial and sturdy construction: as previously stated,
materials are weather -resistant and high quality. The maintenance of orderly appearance shall
be enforced.
All signs shall be kept in good repair; landscaping surrounding the freestanding signs
shall be kept trimmed and neat and shall not obscure the text of the signs.
This criterion shall be enforced
e) Wall Mounted Signs
Section 10 of the Sign Ordinance governs the size and location of wall -mounted signs
and shall be enforced by the Code Officer.
Pursuant to Table 10-1 of the Sign Ordinance, a wall -mounted sign for a multi -tenant
building or a multi -building lot with a master signage permit in any district with
freestanding or landscape sign shall not exceed 15% of the area of the facade to which it
is attached or 100 sq. ft., whichever is smaller.
Pursuant to Table 10-1 of the Sign Ordinance, the total area of all wall -mounted signs on
the subject property shall not exceed 10% of the area of principal public facade of each
building.
Section 10(c) states that a wall -mounted sign shall not project above the roof or parapet
of the building nor below the top of any first floor doorway unless permitted through the
design review approval process.
Pursuant to Section 10(d), a wall -mounted sign shall not cover any opening or project
beyond the top or end of any wall to which it is attached.
Section 10(g) stipulates that a wall -mounted sign shall not project from the wall in excess
of 9".
The Code Officer shall ensure that these requirements are met at the time of application of
CAUsers\Mark\Documents\South Burlington DRB\12.4.12 Meeting Decisions\DR_12_04_100Dorset&4Market_Judge_ffd (1).doc 3
individual signs.
0 Freestanding Signs
Section 9(h) states that free-standing signs along Dorset Street are to be located in a
sign corridor that begins adjacent to the road Right -of -Way and runs sixteen (16) feet
from the edge of the Right of Way toward the building face.
One of the proposed freestanding signs is within the Dorset Street Sign Corridor and is in
compliance with this criterion.
Section 9(h) states that free-standing signs in the Dorset Street/City Center District may
not exceed thirty-two (32) square feet in overall dimensions and may be no higher than
twelve (12) feet, measured from the average finished grade at the base of the sign to the
highest point of any part of the sign structure.
This shall be enforced by the Code Officer at the time of application of individual signs.
OTHER: Landscaping
The proposed master signage permit proposes the removal of a tree on the property.
Landscaping is not within the purview of the Sign Ordinance, and therefore is not reviewable by
the Board with this application. The decision shall not be construed to make a finding or
approval of such landscaping changes to the property.
DECISION
Motion by Roger Farley, seconded by Tim Barritt, to approve Design Review Application #DR-
12-04 of Judge Development Corporation subject to the following conditions:
1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall
remain in effect.
2. The applicant shall obtain a sign permit consistent with the master sign approval from the
Code Officer prior to any changes to signs on the property
3. Illuminated signs shall be limited to internal illumination.
4. Wall signs for tenants / business with direct access to the outside, each individual sign shall
be limited to a maximum of three (3) colors, and that there shall be no limit on the overall
number of colors on the entire property. Sign casings shall be either black or white. Sign
casing colors shall not count towards the maximum number of colors permitted on a sign.
5. Wall signs for tenants / businesses without direct access to the outdoors shall be limited to a
holly green background with white copy (text) and graphics. These shall not be illuminated.
These signs shall be 1" deep aluminum with %" Plexiglas copy. These signs shall match the
spec sheet submitted by Barlo Signs, Sheet B-12-05-9661 sheet 3.4.
CAUsers\Mark\Documents\South Burlington DRB\12.4.12 Meeting Decisions\DR_12_04_100Dorset&4Market_Judge_ffd (1).doc 4
6. Freestanding signs shall be limited to opaque green background with white translucent copy
text) and graphics
7. There are no limitations on font or font type.
8. Pursuant to Section 20 of the Sign Ordinance, all signs shall be of substantial and sturdy
construction, kept in good repair, and painted or cleaned as necessary to maintain a clean,
safe, and orderly appearance.
9. All signs shall be kept in good repair; landscaping surrounding the freestanding signs shall
be kept trimmed and neat and shall not obscure the text of the signs.
Tim Barritt yea nay abstain not present
Mark Behr yea nay abstain not present
Roger Farley yea nay abstain not present
Art Klugo yea nay abstain not present
Bill Miller yea nay abstain not present
Michael Sirotkin yea nay abstain not present
Bill Stuono yea nay abstain not present
Motion carried by a vote of 6 — 0 — 0
Signed this 6th day of December 2012, by
Digitally signed by Mark C. Behr
Mark C B e h r em =
Mark C. Behr, o, ,
cemaitil=mark@rhbpc.com=US
Date: 2012.12.06 08:23:58-05'00'
Mark Behr, Chairman
Please note: An appeal of this decision may be taken by filing, within 30 days of the date of this
decision, a notice of appeal and the required fee by certified mail to the Superior Court,
Environmental Division. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b). A copy of the notice of appeal must also be
mailed to the City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department at 575 Dorset Street,
South Burlington, VT 05403. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b)(4)(A). Please contact the Environmental
Division at 802-828-1660 or hftp://vermontoudiciary.org/GTC/environmental/default.as for
more information on filing requirements, deadlines, fees and mailing address.
The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state
permits for this project. Call 802.879.5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist.
C:\Users\Mark\Documents\South Burlington DRB\12.4.12 Meeting Decisions\DR_12_04_100Dorset&4Market_Judge_ffd (1).doc 5