HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda 08_SP-22-028_4 Harbor View Rd_Rieley Cohen PtspCITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD
SP-22-028_4 Harbor View Rd_Rieley Cohen Ptsp_SC_2022-
07-06.docx
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING
Report preparation date: June 29, 2022
Plans received: June 3, 2022
4 Harbor View Rd
Site Plan Application #SP-22-028
Meeting date: July 6, 2022
Owner/Applicant
Rieley Cohen Partnership, LLC
PO Box 4279
Burlington, VT 05406
Engineer
TCE
478 Blair Park Road
Williston, VT 05495
Property Information
Tax Parcel 0780-00004
Commercial 2 Zoning District, Transit Overlay District
Location Map
#SP-22-028
2
PROJECT DESCRPTION
Site plan application #SP-22-028 of Rieley Cohen Partnership, LLC to amend a previously approved site
plan for a 13,000 sf contractor or building trade facility with outdoor storage. The amendment consists
of constructing a 5,500 sf addition and additional outdoor storage, 4 Harbor View Road.
CONTEXT
This project is subject to Site Plan Review Standards, and Transit Overlay District. The property most
recently received site plan approval #SP-19-41 to change the use to a contractor or building trade facility
and construct an accessory structure.
COMMENTS
Planning Director Paul Conner and Development Review Planner Marla Keene (“Planning Staff”) have
reviewed the plans submitted on 6/3/2022 and offer the following comments. Comments for the
Board’s attention are indicated in red.
A) ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
The project is located in the C2 zoning district.
Commercial 2 Zoning District Required Proposed
Min. Lot Size 40,000 sf 1.84 ac (no change)
Max. Building Coverage 40% 25.1%
Max. Overall Coverage 70% 61.9%
Min. Front Setback (Urban Design
Overlay District)
20 ft. 38 ft.
Max Front Setback Coverage 30% 0%
Min. Side Setback 10 ft. 30 ft. (no change)
Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. 30 ft. (no change)
Building Height (pitched roof) 40 ft. 17 ft.
Meets requirement
B) SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS
14.06 General Review Standards
The proposed building addition consists of a loading dock area with interior partitions. The proposed
addition reduces the front setback and the stormwater management system requires removal of the
existing vegetated area between the building and the street. Therefore compliance with these standards
becomes more reliant upon the configuration of the building.
A. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site.
(1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from
structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and
adequate parking areas.
#SP-22-028
3
1. The applicant’s cover letter describes the proposed addition as for the purposes of expanding the
current business. However the layout of the addition includes individual spaces within
independent entrances, restroom facilities, and fire-rated partitions. Staff recommends the
Board require the applicant to clarify the proposed use and function of the facility. Though a
multi-tenant building is not necessarily prohibited, there are several standards which may apply
differently.
The DRB shall consider the following:
(a) Street Frontage. Maintain internally-consistent building setbacks and landscaping
along the street.
Staff considers the proposed addition improves consistency with adjoining building setbacks along
the street.
(b) Building Placement, Orientation. Maintain or establish a consistent orientation to the
street and, where a prevalent pattern exists, shall continue the manner in which the site’s
existing building foundations relate to the site’s topography and grade.
2. The proposed building addition is not oriented to the street. Adjoining properties are mixed in
their orientation. However, since the proposed addition reduces setback and removes screening
vegetation, Staff recommends the Board direct the applicant to improve the appearance of the
building such that there are some architectural details, such as windows and variations in siding
materials, establishing a street-facing presence to the building.
(c) Transition Contrast in Scale. Minimize and mitigate abrupt contrasts in scale between
existing, planned or approved development, and proposed development.
Staff considers the proposed addition to be consistent in scale with adjoining buildings.
(d) Pedestrian Orientation. Improve and enhance pedestrian connections and walkability
within the area proposed for development.
There is no pedestrian orientation existing or proposed. There are no sidewalks or pathways. The
existing sidewalk on Harbor View Road is on the opposite side of the street. Staff considers the
proposed addition does not create sufficient nexus to require improvements to pedestrian
connections or walkability.
(e) Solar Gain. Orient their rooflines to maximize solar gain potential, to the extent
possible within the context of the overall standards of these regulations.
Staff considers the proposed flat roof does not detract from compliance with this criterion.
(2) Parking:
(a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Any side of a building
facing a public street shall be considered a front side of a building for the purposes of
this subsection.
It appears the applicant is proposing to provide parking within an area they have
designated as outdoor storage. Parking is located to the side of the building. Parking to
the side of the building is regulated under 14.06A(2)(c) as follows
#SP-22-028
4
Parking area width. Surface parking areas and affiliated drive aisles located to the
side of buildings shall not exceed the width of building(s), Civic Spaces, and Site
Amenities along any street frontage. This may be calculated separately or
cumulatively for corner lots. Parking approved pursuant to 14.07(B)(2)(b) shall be
exempt from this subsection.
3. The proposed parking within the outdoor storage area is greater than the width of the
building along the street and therefore this criterion is not met. Staff recommends the
Board discuss with the applicant the proposed use of this area. If the area is for outdoor
storage of landscaping vehicles (not including registered vehicles), it is not subject to this
standard, but the Board should require striping to be removed.
(3) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale
of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or anticipated adjoining buildings.
The footprint of the building after the addition will remain consistent with the footprint of buildings
on adjoining properties. It is proposed to be one story, while the buildings on the adjoining sites are
one story, two stories, or a combination of both. Staff considers this criterion met.
B. Relationship of Structures and Site to Adjoining Area.
(1) The Development Review Board shall encourage the use of a combination of common
materials and architectural characteristics (e.g., rhythm, color, texture, form or detailing),
landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between
buildings of different architectural styles.
(2) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to
existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed
structures.
(3) To accomplish (1) and (2), the DRB shall consider:
(a) Pattern and Rhythm. Update or maintain or extend the overall pattern of
development defined by the planned or existing street grid, block configurations,
position and orientation of principal buildings, prevalence of attached or detached
building types.
(b) Architectural Features. Respond to recurring or representative architectural
features that define neighborhood character, without adhering to a particular
architectural style.
(c) Privacy. Limit impacts and intrusions to privacy on adjoining properties,
including side and back yard areas through context sensitive design.
The addition is proposed to be clad in the same light colored metal panel siding as the existing
building. As noted above, the setback and screening of the building is proposed to be
significantly reduced.
4. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to improve both the appearance of the
building addition facing the street and the proposed screening of the addition. Adjoining
properties Potential improvements that would not be incompatible with the nature of the use
include a row of simple windows, variations in siding texture, color, and orientation, variations in
#SP-22-028
5
roofline, or decorative lattice work, in conjunction with a planted bioretention area. Other
options certainly exist.
C. Site Amenity Requirement
(1) Sites are required to include a specific minimum area for appropriate Site Amenities. This
section does not apply to projects within the City Center FBC District (which are governed by Section
8.08).
(2) Applicability. Applications for the following shall be required to provide Site Amenities:
(a) Additions or expansions exceeding 5,000 SF for existing non-residential structures.
(3) The required area shall be:
(a) For Non-Residential development, a minimum of 6% of non-residential building gross
floor area.
The proposed 5,280 sf addition requires a 317 sf amenity space.
(4) The DRB may, in its discretion, provide a credit for up to 50% of the required Site Amenity
area if the Applicant demonstrates a safe, walkable connection to an existing Civic Space or public
park that is accessible by the general public and located within five-hundred (500) feet of at least
one pedestrian access point for each building on the lot via a walking route and/or pedestrian way.
A “safe, walkable connection” shall not include or require crossing a four-lane road.
No existing civic spaces or public parks are within five-hundred feet.
5. The applicant must provide a site amenity adherent with one of the site amenity types in LDR 11B.
The snippet/parklet type may be most applicable. It is required to be directly adjacent to the public
right of way and sidewalk or operable building entry. Seating must be the main focus of the space,
with landscaping a primary component. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to revise
the plans to provide a site amenity prior to closing the hearing.
14.07 Specific Review Standards
In all Zoning Districts and the City Center Form Based Codes District, the following standards shall
apply:
A. Environmental Protection Standards. All proposed development shall be subject to the
applicable requirements of Article 12, Environmental Protection Standards.
No protected resource areas are present on this site. This criterion is not applicable.
B. Site Design Features. All proposed development shall comply with standards for the
placement of buildings, parking and loading areas, landscaping and screening, open space,
stormwater, lighting, and other applicable standards related to site design pursuant to these
Land Development Regulations.
These standards are contained in Article 13 and are discussed below.
C. Access and Circulation. All proposed development shall comply with site access and
circulation standards of Section 15.A.14.
#SP-22-028
6
No changes to site access or circulation are proposed.
D. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) [reserved]
E. Building Form. Development within the City Center Form Based Code District, the Urban
Design Overlay District, and other districts with supplemental building form standards shall
adhere to the standards contained therein.
This criterion is not applicable.
F. Streetscape Improvements. A proposed new construction or extension/expansion of an
existing structure exceeding the thresholds listed in either (a) Section 14.09(B) or (b) Section
8.11(D) within the City Center Form Based Code, or Section 3.15(D) in all other zoning districts,
shall be required to upgrade adjacent sidewalks, greenbelts, and related street furniture
(trees, benches, etc.) to the standards contained within the applicable Street Type and
Building Envelope Standard. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to limit
requirements for additional upgrades as necessary to meet the requirements of these
Regulations.
Staff considers Harbor View Road to be a Bicycle Boulevard - Neighborhood Collector.
Neighborhood collectors are required to have a 10-ft recreation path on one side, 4-ft bike
lanes, and vertical faced curb. There is an existing sidewalk on the opposite side of Harbor View
Road from the project. The street is curbed. Staff considers that since the opposite side of the
road is established as the pedestrian side, no upgrades are necessary.
F. Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land may be required on any lot for
provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce
curb cuts onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or
other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area.
See 13.02F below for discussion of access.
G. Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire-served utility lines and service
connections shall be underground insofar as feasible and subject to state public utilities
regulations. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a
harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Standards of Section 15.A.18,
Infrastructure, Utilities, and Services, shall also be met.
6. It appears electrical lines are proposed to be underground; Staff recommends the Board confirm.
The applicant is proposing a new electrical transformer, indicated on the plans with the note
“prior to construction, confirm primary electric location and separation requirements to new
structure with GMP.” Staff recommends the Board include a condition that any necessary
modification to the location of the transformer shall be subject to review of the administrative
officer.
H. Disposal of Wastes. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including
compliance with any recycling, composting, or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure
and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the
enclosure(s). Small receptacles intended for use by households or the public (ie, non-dumpster,
non-large drum) shall not be required to be fenced or screened.
#SP-22-028
7
7. It is unclear where the solid waste disposal facility is proposed. Staff recommends the Board
require the applicant to modify their plans to clearly demonstrate compliance with this criterion.
C) SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS
13.02 Off Street Parking and Loading
F. Access management Requirements. It is the intent of the City to minimize traffic and
pedestrian conflicts caused by vehicular driveways on public roadways by reducing the
number of required driveways and by minimizing the number of vehicles utilizing such
driveways off public roadways. All applicants must make an effort to reduce these impacts. All
commercial lots (retail, restaurant, office, service uses, excluding residential, agricultural and
industrial uses) located adjacent to other commercial lots must provide a driveway connection
to any adjacent commercial lot. If the adjacent property owner does not want to provide for
that connection, the applicant must provide an easement to do so in the future when
circumstances may change. This driveway connection or easement should be located where
vehicular and pedestrian circulation is most feasible.
There is an existing driveway connection to the property to the west. Staff considers a
connection to the east to be infeasible due to the location of the building. Staff considers a
connection to the property to the south to be infeasible due to the location of the building on
the property to the south.
G. Design requirements for Parking Spaces, Parking Aisles, Lighting and Landscaping
(1) Design requirements for off-street parking and loading are provided in Table 13-2
and Figure 13-1, Section 13.04, Landscaping , Screening, and Street Trees, and Section
13.07, Exterior Lighting. All paved parking spaces shall be striped or otherwise
physically delimited.
8. There are five (5) parking spaces proposed to be retained. Areas not approved for
parking may not be used as parking. If more than one tenant is proposed, it is likely
more than five spaces will be needed. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant
to provide adequate parking to prevent illegal parking from becoming an issue.
Parking lot landscaping is further discussed under 13.04 below.
(2) The location of parking areas and loading docks shall prevent conflicts with
entering and existing traffic onto a public street and prevent conflicts between
vehicles and pedestrians. The distance between access points and parking areas shall
be adequate to minimize blockage and prevent back-ups onto the public street.
The applicants provided floor plans and elevations proposed six loading docks. Staff
considers the locations of these loading docks to meet this criterion. The floor plan and
elevations also indicate a “future overhead door.” Staff recommends the Board require
the applicant to remove this door from the plans. Should the applicant later wish to add
a door, they may apply for a site plan amendment at that time.
(3) Provision shall be made for access by police, fire and emergency vehicles.
#SP-22-028
8
Staff spoke with the Fire Chief about the project on 6/23/2022 who indicated concern
about the potential partitioning of the space into multiple tenants. The Fire Chief is
working with the applicant. Staff will continue to coordinate with the Fire Department
on review of this project.
(4) Pedestrian safety. Insofar as practicable, pedestrian and bicycle circulation shall be
separated from motor vehicle circulation. Safe and convenient pedestrian circulation,
including appropriate sidewalks, shall be provided on the site and its approaches. The
pedestrian circulation on site shall be designed to minimize adverse effects of
vehicular traffic on sidewalks and recreation paths.
Pedestrian pathways are not provided. As noted above, Staff considers the proposed
addition does not create sufficient nexus to require improvements to pedestrian
connections or walkability.
(5) Bicycle parking or storage facility. See Section 13.03
(6) Stormwater management strategies that facilitate infiltration including but not
limited to recessed planting islands, bioretention facilities, and pervious parking
spaces are encouraged in the design of any off-street parking or loading area.
Stormwater management is discussed under 13.05 below.
13.08 Outdoor Storage and Display
A. Outdoor Storage. Outdoor storage of goods, materials, vehicles for other than daily use, and
equipment shall be subject to the following provisions:
(1) Any outdoor storage shall be appurtenant to the primary use of the property and shall be allowed
only in nonresidential districts and upon approval of the DRB in conjunction with a site plan,
conditional use and/or PUD application.
This application is for site plan. Staff considers this criterion met.
(2) The Development Review Board may require that outdoor storage areas in connection with
commercial or industrial uses be enclosed and/or screened where the storage area may comprise
an attractive nuisance, where the proposed use of the storage areas present opportunities for theft,
or where the Board finds that said storage areas are in view of residentially-zoned parcels.
The applicant is proposing to scree the outdoor storage area with a chain link fence with screen mesh,
and a row of arborvitae. No statement has been made as to the height of the fence. Fences over eight
feet in height require conditional use review.
9. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to provide a fence detail and require that the
fence be no greater than eight feet in height.
13.04 Landscaping, Screening & Street Trees
B. Except for parking spaces accessory to a one-family or two-family dwelling, all off-street
parking areas subject to review by the Development Review Board, shall be curbed and landscaped
with appropriate trees, shrubs, and other plants including ground covers, as approved by the
#SP-22-028
9
Development Review Board. Sections of recessed curb are permitted if their purpose is to allow
stormwater runoff from the adjacent parking area to reach stormwater collection, treatment and
management infrastructure. The Development Review Board shall consider the adequacy of the
proposed landscaping to assure the establishment of a safe, convenient, and attractive parking area
and the privacy and comfort of abutting properties.
(1) All off-street parking areas shall be landscaped around the perimeter of the lot with trees,
shrubs and other plants. Perimeter planting shall be set back from the curb sufficiently to allow for
snow storage. The purpose of perimeter planting shall be to mitigate the view of the parking lot
from the public way and from adjacent uses and properties, and to provide shade and canopy for
the parking lot. In some situations it may be necessary both for surveillance purposes and for the
perception of safety to install the size and type of plants that leave visual access between the
parking lot to the public way or other pedestrian areas.
There is an existing wooded area to be retained along the south side of the existing parking and
outdoor storage area. There is a proposed hedge to the north (discussed above pertaining to
outdoor storage). There is no landscaping to the west. Though Staff does not consider additional
screening to be necessary to the west of the parking area, Staff notes it is an area where additional
plantings may be possible should they be required by the Board.
(2) In all parking areas containing twenty-eight (28) or more contiguous parking spaces and/or in
parking lots with more than a single circulation lane, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of
the parking lot shall be landscaped islands planted with trees, shrubs and other plants. Such
requirement shall not apply to structured parking or below-ground parking.
Fewer than 28 spaces are proposed.
(3) All interior and perimeter planting shall be protected by curbing unless specifically designed as
a collection and treatment area for management of stormwater runoff as per 13.04(B)(5)(c)
below. Interior planted islands shall have a minimum dimension of six (6) feet on any one side, and
shall have a minimum square footage of sixty (60) square feet. Large islands are encouraged.
Perimeter planting is protected by a fence. Staff considers this criterion met.
(4) Landscaping Requirements
(a) Landscaping shall include a variety of trees, shrubs, grasses and ground covers. All
planting shall be species hardy for the region and, if located in areas receiving road runoff or
salt spray, shall be salt-tolerant.
The City Arborist reviewed the plans on 6/22/2022 and indicated that the landscaping plan is
acceptable.
(b) At least one (1) major deciduous shade tree shall be provided within or near the
perimeter of each parking area, for every five (5) parking spaces. The trees shall be placed
evenly throughout the parking lot to provide shade and reduce glare. Trees shall be placed a
minimum of thirty (30) feet apart.
This criterion is not met. Noncompliance with this criterion is reduced by reducing the number
of parking spaces.
#SP-22-028
10
(c) Trees shall have a caliper equal to or greater than two and one-half (2 ½) inches when
measured on the tree stem, six (6) inches above the root ball.
This criterion is proposed to be met.
(d) Where more than ten (10) trees are installed, a mix of species is encouraged; the
species should be grouped or located in a manner that reinforces the design and layout of the
parking lot and the site.
10 trees are proposed, utilizing two species.
(e) Within the City Center FBC District, landscaping required within this section shall not
count towards meeting minimum landscape budget requirements as detailed in Section
13.04(G).
N/A
(7) Snow storage areas must be specified and located in an area that minimizes the potential for
erosion and contaminated runoff into any adjacent or nearby surface waters.
10. Snow storage areas are specified on the plans to the rear of the outdoor storage areas. Staff
recommends the Board ask the applicant to explain how the outdoor storage areas will be used
that facilitates locating snow storage behind them.
C. Screening or buffering. The Development Review Board will require landscaping, fencing, land
shaping and/or screening along property boundaries (lot lines) whenever it determines that a) two
adjacent sites are dissimilar and should be screened or buffered from each other, or b) a property’s
appearance should be improved, which property is covered excessively with pavement or structures or
is otherwise insufficiently landscaped, or c) a commercial, industrial, and multi-family use abuts a
residential district or institutional use, or (d) a parking or loading area is adjacent to or visible from a
public street.
Staff considers this criterion to work in conjunction with 14.06B above. The applicant is proposing to
remove a large wooded area with little understory growth between the existing building and the street,
and expand the building and outdoor storage towards the street by 42 ft. Existing trees to be removed
in this area consist of mostly large white pine, with some interspersed deciduous trees. The applicant is
proposing to plant five maple trees and five oak trees in this area. Staff considers that the nature of the
proposed use as a site for a large amount of outdoor storage to be a use that should be screened. The
applicant is proposing a fence with a mesh screen.
11. Staff considers a mesh screen to be significantly less attractive than vegetation and recommends the
Board require the applicant to provide a vegetation plan that consists of variable height plantings in
order to comply with this criterion.
D. Front Yards of Non-Residential and Multi-Family Uses. In the case of non-residential and multi-
family uses, the required front yard and/or the frontage along designated arterial and collector
streets (see Article 3, Section 3.06 for this list) shall be suitably landscaped and maintained in good
appearance. Landscape elements that reduce stormwater runoff and promote stormwater infiltration
are encouraged. The Development Review Board shall require the applicant to meet the provisions of
sections 13.04(F) and (G).
#SP-22-028
11
The applicant is proposing an unplanted bioretention area in the front yard. Staff considers planting this
bioretention area may be one way to meet criterion C above.
G(3) Landscaping Budget Requirements. The Development Review Board shall require minimum
planting costs for all site plans, as shown in Table 13-4 below. In evaluating landscaping requirements,
some credit may be granted for existing trees or for site improvements other than tree planting as
long as the objectives of this section are not reduced. The costs below are cumulative; for example, a
landscaping budget shall be required to show a planned expenditure of three percent of the first
$250,000 in construction or improvement cost plus two percent of the next $250,000 in construction or
improvement cost, plus one percent of the remaining cost over $500,000. The landscaping budget shall
be prepared by a landscape architect or professional landscape designer.
The cost of the proposed building addition is $660,000, requiring $11,100 in plantings. The applicant has
proposed $15,105 in trees and shrubs. This criterion is met.
I. Landscape Maintenance. Maintenance and responsibility. All planting shown on an approved site
plan shall be maintained by the property owner in a vigorous growing condition throughout the
duration of the use. Plants not so maintained shall be replaced with new plants at the beginning of the
next immediately following growing season. Trees with a caliper of less than 5” may be replaced on an
inch-by-inch basis with trees of the same genus of at least 2” caliper each. No permit shall be required
for such replacements provided they conform to the approved site plan. Replacement of trees with a
caliper of greater than 5” shall require an amendment to the site plan.
The most recent previously approved plans showed the wooded area to be removed as a general
wooded area, not as individual trees required to be planted. However, the 1983 plan indicates that the
wooded area to be removed, as well as the planting bed to be removed adjacent to the existing building,
were required elements of that site plan planted at the time of approval. The 1983 approval was for a
warehouse and office building with outdoor storage, which Staff considers consistent with the current
use. The zoning district has been C2 since before that time. Therefore Staff considers this criterion
applies to the wooded areas on the plans, including a large number of plantings that have not been
maintained as required. Plantings approved in 1983 include the following
Quantity Name Size
3 “Emerald Queen” Norway
Maple
3 ½” – 4” cal.
21 Paper Birch 10 – 12’ height
94 Red Osier Dogwood 3 – 4’ height
107 White Pine 6 – 8’ height
The 1983 plan and decision are included in the packet for the Board. The 1983 decision states that
“screening of the storage area shall be reviewed after 1 year and may be required to be upgraded.
Other landscaping is satisfactory.” Staff considers this, combined with the unusually high quantity of
plantings, to be evidence that the Board at the time found screening of the property to be of
particular importance.
#SP-22-028
12
11. The LDR states that “replacement of trees with a caliper of greater than 5” shall require an
amendment to the site plan.” Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to provide
landscaping equivalent to that approved in 1983. Equivalency may consist of a similar total caliper
of trees, a similar total value of trees, or a similar resulting buffering and screening regardless of
caliper or value. The replacement of previously approved landscaping is separate from the required
$11,100 in plantings for the proposed building expansion. Staff notes this is likely to be a challenge
to achieve given the proposed building and outdoor storage expansion, which is within the allowable
coverage for the district, and recommends the Board discuss with the applicant how this may be
accomplished.
13.05 Stormwater Management
Stormwater standards apply when one-half acre or more of impervious surface exists or is proposed to
exist, and where 5,000 sf of impervious is created or reconstructed. The City Stormwater Section
reviewed the proposed plans on 6/24/2022 and offers the following comments.
The Stormwater Section has reviewed the “4 Harbor View Road” site plan prepared by Lamoureux &
Dickinson Consulting Engineers, dated 4/1/22 and last updated on 6/2/22. We would like to offer the
following comments:
1. This project is located in the Bartlett Brook watershed. This watershed is listed as stormwater
impaired by the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC).
2. The property currently has an expired State stormwater permit (2-0153).
3. The project is only proposing treat stormwater runoff form the new and redeveloped
impervious surfaced. However, projects with an expired permit seeking permit renewal
within a stormwater impaired watershed, with less than 3 acres of impervious surface,
subject to §3.1.C.4.a of the 3-9050 Stormwater General Permit, are required to meet the
redevelopment standard and channel protection standard for the whole site, unless the
TMDL has already been met. The applicant should confirm what treatment standards are
required for this site to obtain valid permit coverage.
4. The applicant indicated that the seasonal high groundwater table was found less than 2 feet
from the ground surface, with a reference made to Sheet ST1 for soils data. Please provide
Sheet ST1 for review.
a. Is the bioretention system being proposed in the seasonal high groundwater table? The
Vermont Stormwater Management Manual §4.3.1.1 indicates that the bottom of the
bioretention practice shall be located at or above the seasonal high groundwater table.
5. As the project has more than one-half acre or more of impervious surface and is proposing to
develop more than 5,000 sf of impervious surface, the project is subject to the requirements
of section 13.05 of the LDRs.
6. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to regularly maintain all
stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure.
12. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to address the comments of the City Stormwater
Section prior to closing the hearing.
#SP-22-028
13
13.07 Exterior Lighting
Lighting requirements are summarized as follows.
(1) Fixtures must be downcast and shielded
(2) Illumination must be evenly distributed
(3) Fixtures must be placed to minimize lighting from becoming a nuisance
(4) Poles shall be rustproof metal, cast iron, fiberglass, finished wood or similar structural
material, with a decorative surface or finish
(5) Poles & building mounted fixtures may be no higher than 30-ft
(6) Poles must be located in safe locations
Specific requirements for maximum illumination levels are included in Appendix A and are limited to 3
foot candles average at ground level. The applicant has indicated no changes to existing exterior lighting
are proposed, and that existing fixtures are downcast and shielded.
The applicant is proposing six additional building mounted lights and one parking lot light. Maximum
illumination levels are 7.6 lumens near the wall mounted fixtures. Illumination levels are near zero at
the property line. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to update the plan to clearly
indicate that the existing parking lot lights that are currently at the perimeter of the paved area but will
be in the center of the paved area with the expanded pavement are to be removed.
13.03 Bicycle Parking and Storage
The applicant has proposed to retain the existing bicycle rack. The required number of bicycle parking
spaces is two. Staff considers bicycle parking standards to be met.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board work with the applicant to address the issues identified herein.
Respectfully submitted,
Marla Keene, Development Review Planner
EWWWWWSSSSSSGGGGGEEEHARBOR VIEW ROAD40'10'EXISTING BUILDING13,000 SF50' WIDE EASEMENTFOR INGRESS &EGRESS TO LOT 3D O C K P L A T F O R MPLANTING BEDGAS METERFDCELECOH DOOROH DOOROH DOOREDGE GRAVELEDGE PAVEMENT71'30'30'10'10'LOADING SPACELOADING SPACE5 SPACESO U T S I D E S T O R A G EEXISTING ACESSORY STRUCTURE(3 SIDED) FOR STORAGE OF MATERIALSEXISTING GATE WITHSCREEN MESHKSI COMMERCIALPROPERTIES, LLCN/F8 HARBOR VIEW ROADJOHN LARKIN, INC.N/F9 HARBOR VIEW ROADLARKIN, INNS, LPN/F1720 SHELBURNE ROADEXISTING BIKE RACKTYPICAL EXISTING TREELINEEXISTING CHAIN LINKFENCE WITH SCREEN MESHO U T S I D E S T O R A G ETYPICAL PROPOSEDTREELINEDUMPSTERSEXISTING SIDEWALKAPPROXIMATE LOCATIONOF EXISTING ELEC &TELECOM LINES8" PVC ROOF DRAINPOST INDICATOR VALVEC O N C R E T E S U R F A C E P A V E D S U R F A C E P A V E D S U R F A C E15" MAPLE6" POPLAR8" POPLAR6" WH. PINE12" WH.PINE6" WH.PINE18" WH.PINE12" WH.PINE8" WH.PINE12" WH.PINE15" MAPLE10" WH.PINE10" WH.PINE14" WH.PINE10" WH.PINE10" WH.PINE10" WH.PINE20" WH.PINE12" WH.PINE12" WH.PINE12" WH.PINE14" WH.PINE16" WH.PINE16" WH.PINE12" WH.PINE12" WH.PINE12" WH.PINE16" WH.PINESHRUBSS U M A C & S H R U B SS U M A C & S H R U B S22" WH.PINE10" MAPLE8" MAPLE11" MAPLE7" ASHMULTI-STEM MAPLE8" BLACK CHERRY8" MAPLE8" MAPLE7" MAPLE12" MAPLE20" WH.PINE8" MAPLE24" WH.PINE9" ASH12" CEDAR14" WH.PINE12" MAPLE7" MAPLE7" ASH16" WH.PINE10" MAPLE6" WH.PINE24" POPLAR9" WH.PINE12" WH.PINE8" WH.PINE12" WH.PINE8" WH.PINE12" WH.PINESHRUBSSHRUBSSHRUBSW H I T E P I N E T R E E SS H R U B S A N D S M A L L T R E E SEXISTINGCONDITIONS PLAN2002040801" = 20 FEET1" = 20'NOTES:1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN IS TO PRESENT THE EXISTING SITE LAYOUT. EXISTINGCONDITIONS INFORMATION IS BASED UPON THE UTILITY PLAN FOR A NEW WAREHOUSEAND OFFICE BUILDING, SHEET LS-2, DATED 03-15-1983 BY ALEXANDER / TRUEX / deGROOT,AND FIELD SURVEY BY THIS OFFICE ON OCTOBER 18, 2019.3. EXISTING UTILITIES INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS OBTAINED FROM THE ABOVEREFERENCED PLAN AND MAY NOT BE COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFYDIGSAFE AND THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND WATERDEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION.4. BOUNDARY DATA IS BASED UPON A PLAN TITLED "COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION, BARTLETTPROPERTY" BY KREBS & LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC., LAST REVISED 09-14-1982AND RECORDED IN SLIDE 136 OF THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS.196LEGENDPROJECT BOUNDARYABUTTING PROPERTY LINEEXISTING CONTOUR8THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFYAND OBTAIN A TICKET FROM"DIGSAFE" AT 811 PRIOR TO ANYEXCAVATION.4 HARBOR VIEW ROADSOUTH BURLINGTON, VTDateSheet numberScaleCheckedDrawnDesignSurveyProject No.Lamoureux & DickinsonConsulting Engineers, Inc.14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452802-878-4450 www.LDengineering.comDateRevisionByThese plans shall only be used for the purpose shown below:Sketch/ConceptPreliminaryFinal Local ReviewAct 250 ReviewConstructionRecord Drawing04-01-22DJGABRABR19108MJBEXISTING STORM PIPEEXISTING GAS LINEEXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPESEXISTING BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHTEXISTING POLE MOUNTED LIGHT2 HARBOR VIEW ROADGEXISTING WATER LINE, VALVE, & HYDRANTWEXISTING TREE LINECHAIN LINK FENCE WITH MESH SCREENEXISTING EASEMENTCHAIN LINK FENCECHAMP CAR CARECENTER, INC.N/FALLEN BROOKDEVELOPMENT, INC.N/F40 ALLEN ROADBUILDING SETBACK05-06-22 ADD INDIVIDUAL TREESABR
200200198200196
202198196198198196194190196192190202196202202198196 194192
HARBOR VIEW ROAD40'10'EXISTING BUILDING13,000 SF50' WIDE EASEMENTFOR INGRESS &EGRESS TO LOT 3D O C K P L A T F O R MPLANTINGBEDGAS METERFDCELECOH DOOROH DOOROH DOOREDGE GRAVELEDGE PAVEMENT71'30'30'10'10'LOADING SPACELOADING SPACE5 SPACESEXISTING ACESSORY STRUCTURE(3 SIDED) FOR STORAGE OF MATERIALSEXISTING GATE WITHSCREEN MESHKSI COMMERCIALPROPERTIES, LLCN/F8 HARBOR VIEW ROADJOHN LARKIN, INC.N/F9 HARBOR VIEW ROADLARKIN, INNS, LPN/F1720 SHELBURNE ROADEXISTING BIKE RACKTYPICAL EXISTING TREELINEEXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE WITHSCREEN MESH TO BE RELOCATED TOPERIMETER OF NEW PAVEMENT &OUTSIDE STORAGEPROPOSEDBUILDINGADDITION5,280 SFO U T S I D E S T O R A G EO U T S I D E S T O R A G EO U T S I D E S T O R A G ETYPICAL PROPOSEDTREELINEPROPOSED CHAIN LINKFENCE WITH SCREEN MESH38 To7 ClO U T S I D E S T O R A G EO U T S I D E S T O R A G EPROPOSED CHAINLINK FENCE WITHSCREEN MESHSITE PLAN& LANDSCAPING PLAN2002040801" = 20 FEET1" = 20'LOCATION MAPN.T.S.PARCEL DATAPARCEL ID:0780-00004TOTAL PROJECT AREA: 1.84 ACRESZONING DISTRICT:COMMERCIAL 2MIN. BUILDING SETBACKS:FRONT YARD30 FEETSIDE YARD10 FEETREAR YARD30 FEETACCESSORY STRUCTURESETBACKS:FRONT YARDSAME AS FOR PRINCIPAL STRUCTUREREAR YARD5 FEETSIDE YARD5 FEETMAX. BUILDING HEIGHT: 35 FEET (FLAT) / 40 FEET (PITCHED)15 FEET FOR ACCESSORY BUILDINGEXISTING BLDG HEIGHT: 17 FEET (NO CHANGE)PROPOSED BLDG HEIGHT:MATCH EXISTING PRIMARY BUILDING HEIGHTBUILDING COVERAGE:MAXIMUM ALLOWED = 40%EXISTING = 18.3% (14,694 SF / 80,177 SF)PROPOSED = 24.9% (19,974 SF / 80,177 SF)LOT COVERAGE:MAXIMUM ALLOWED = 70%EXISTING = 49.2% (39,440 SF / 80,177 SF)PROPOSED = 61.9% (49,650 SF / 80,177 SF)FRONT YARD COVERAGE: MAXIMUM ALLOWED = 30%EXISTING = 0% (NO CHANGE)BIKE PARKING:2 SHORT TERM SPACES REQUIRED(SEE PLAN FOR INVERTED-U BIKE RACK)2 LONG TERM SPACES REQUIRED(SECURE BIKE STORAGE TO BE PROVIDED INSIDE BLDG)SHOWER & CHANGING ROOM - NOT REQUIRED1 CLOTHES LOCKER TO BE PROVIDED IN BLDGNOTES:1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN IS TO PRESENT THE EXISTING SITE LAYOUT AND PROPOSEDBUILDING ADDITION AND OUTSIDE STORAGE AREA.2. EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION IS BASED UPON THE UTILITY PLAN FOR A NEWWAREHOUSE AND OFFICE BUILDING, SHEET LS-2, DATED 03-15-1983 BY ALEXANDER / TRUEX/ deGROOT, AND FIELD SURVEY BY THIS OFFICE ON OCTOBER 18, 2019.3. EXISTING UTILITIES INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS OBTAINED FROM THE ABOVEREFERENCED PLAN AND MAY NOT BE COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFYDIGSAFE AND THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND WATERDEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION.4. BOUNDARY DATA IS BASED UPON A PLAN TITLED "COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION, BARTLETTPROPERTY" BY KREBS & LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC., LAST REVISED 09-14-1982AND RECORDED IN SLIDE 136 OF THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS.SITE196LEGENDPROJECT BOUNDARYABUTTING PROPERTY LINEEXISTING CONTOUR1THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFYAND OBTAIN A TICKET FROM"DIGSAFE" AT 811 PRIOR TO ANYEXCAVATION.PLANTING SCHEDULEKeyBotanical NameCommon NameSizeRemarksTrees2 1/2" caliperCelebration MapleAFAcer x freemanii 'Celebration'B&B4 HARBOR VIEW ROADSOUTH BURLINGTON, VTDateSheet numberScaleCheckedDrawnDesignSurveyProject No.Lamoureux & DickinsonConsulting Engineers, Inc.14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452802-878-4450 www.LDengineering.comDateRevisionByThese plans shall only be used for the purpose shown below:Sketch/ConceptPreliminaryFinal Local ReviewAct 250 ReviewConstructionRecord Drawing04-01-22DJGABRABR19108MJBRAILROADUVMHORTICULTURECENTER2 1/2" caliperNorthern Red OakQRQuercus rubraB&BEXISTING STORM PIPEEXISTING GAS LINEEXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPESEXISTING BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHTEXISTING POLE MOUNTED LIGHTShrubs18" - 24" HeightSummersweetClClethra alnifolia 'Ruby SpiceContainer4' - 5' HeightNigra ArborvitaeToThuja occidentalis 'Nigra'B&BROUTE 7
ALLEN ROADROUTE 7
SOUTH BURLINGTON2 HARBOR VIEW ROADSHELBURNESPEAR STREETLAKE CHAMPLAINLAKE CHAMPLAINAPPLICANT & LANDOWNERRIELEY COHEN PARTNERSHIP, LLCP.O. BOX 4279BURLINGTON, VT 05406GEXISTING WATER LINE, VALVE, & HYDRANTWEXISTING TREE LINECHAIN LINK FENCE WITH MESH SCREENEXISTING EASEMENTCHAIN LINK FENCECHAMP CAR CARECENTER, INC.N/FALLEN BROOKDEVELOPMENT, INC.N/F40 ALLEN ROADBUILDING SETBACKSHEET INDEX1SITE PLAN & LANDSCAPING PLAN2GRADING & UTILITY PLAN3LIGHTING PLAN4EROSION PREVENTION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN5POST CONSTRUCTION SOIL DEPTH & QUALITY PLAN6SITEWORK DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS7BIORETENTION AREA DETAILS & SPECIFICATIONS8EXISTING CONDITIONS PLANAFAFAFAFAFQRQRQRQRQR04-28-22REVISE ADDITION SIZEABR
X200200198200196
202198196198198196194190196192190UDUDUD202196EG198196 194192 WWWWWSSSSSGGGGGEEEHARBOR VIEW ROADEXISTINGGAS METERFDCELECOH DOOROH DOOREXISTING GATE WITH SCREENMESH TO REMAINTYPICAL EXISTING TREELINEEXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE WITHSCREEN MESH TO BE RELOCATEDTO PERIMETER OF NEW PAVEMENT& OUTSIDE STORAGEPROPOSED BUILDING ADDITIONFFE = 202.9(MATCH EXISTING BLDG)PROPOSED GATEWITH SCREEN MESHPROPOSED CHAIN LINKFENCE WITH SCREEN MESH18" PE E.S.INV = 197.0NEW 18" PECB1CB2CB36" SDR35 PVC UD6" SDR35 PERF PVC UDNEW 18" PET.B.M.TOP CONC MON.ELEV = 196.39EXISTING WATERMAINPROPOSED TREELINEEXISTING 12" CMP CULVERT.CLEAN CULVERT AND REGRADEINLET AND OUTLET TO DRAINNEW ASPHALT CURBALONG FENCENEW BOULDERRETAINING WALLPERFORM EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION ALONGEXISTING GAS SERVICE TO CONFIRMADEQUATE COVER. COORDINATE WITH VTGAS TO ADJUST SERVICE DEPTH AS REQUIREDPERFORM EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION ALONGEXISTING WATER SERVICE.- IF COVER WILL BE >5 FEET, INSULATE WHERELESS THAN 6 FEET OF COVER.- IF COVER WILL BE <5 FEET, RE-LAY WATERSERVICE TO ACHIEVE 6 FEET COVER.COORDINATE EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION ANDWORK WITH SBURL WATER DEPARTMENT.FUTURE SIGN CB48" PVCINV = 190.0CB5E X I S T I N G C O N C R E T ET O B E R E M O V E D+201.9
+201.9+201.9T.B.M.TOP CONC MON.ELEV = 188.86BIORETENTION AREA #2BIORETENTION AREA #1E X I S T I N G P A V E D D R I V E
TRASH & RECYCLINGCONTAINERSPERFORM EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION ALONGEXISTING SEWER SERVICE.- IF COVER WILL BE >4 FEET, INSULATE WHERE LESSTHAN 6 FEET OF COVER.- IF COVER WILL BE <4 FEET, RE-LAY SEWER SERVICETO ACHIEVE 5 FEET COVER WITH MINIMUM 2% SLOPE.COORDINATE EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION AND WORKWITH SBURL DPW8" SCH40 PVC ROOF DRAIN.CONFIRM PIPE SIZE AND TYPEWITH MEP DESIGN PLANSTYPE II STONE FILLREGRADE DRAINAGEDITCH IN SIDE YARDREMOVE EXISTINGLIGHT POLE AND BASEWITHIN NEW PAVEMENT(TYP OF 2)P L A N T E R B E DREGRADE EXISTING DRAINAGE DITCH REMOVE EXISTING LIGHTPOLE AND BASECLEANOUT, TYP.EXIST. 18" RCPAPPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SAW CUTFOR PAVEMENT REPLACEMENTSEE MEP DESIGN PLANS FORCONDUIT SIZE AND ELECSERVICE REQUIREMENTSPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, CONFIRMPRIMARY ELECTRIC LOCATION ANDSEPARATION REQUIREMENTS TO NEWSTRUCTURE WITH GMPAPPROXIMATELOCATION OFEXISTING ELEC &TELECOM LINESREMOVE POST INDICATORVALVE AND INSTALL CAST IRONVALVE BOX TO FINISH GRADE8" PVC ROOF DRAINS=0.005END ASPHALT CURBAT EXISTING FENCECORNERGAS METER FORPROPOSED ADDITIONAPPROXIMATE LOCATIONOF EXISTING ROOF DRAINXXPERFORM EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION ALONGEXISTING ROOF DRAIN.- IF COVER WILL BE >4 FEET, INSULATE WHERE LESSTHAN 6 FEET OF COVER.- IF COVER WILL BE <4 FEET, RE-LAY SERVICE PIPE TOACHIEVE 5 FEET COVER WITH MINIMUM 1% SLOPE.END 6" PERF. PVCINV = 193.336" SDR35 PVC (SOLID)UTILITY SERVICE RELOCATION NOTE:IF THE EXISTING ROOF DRAIN, SEWER SERVICE, OR GAS SERVICE MUST BERE-LAID TO ACHIEVE THE NECESSARY DEPTH OF COVER, THE HORIZONTALALIGNMENT OF THE NEW PIPING SHALL BE SHIFTED TO AVOIDENCROACHING UPON THE FOOTPRINT OF THE BIORETENTION AREA. NEWCLEANOUTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICALBENDS IN THE NEW SERVICE ROOF DRAIN AND SEWER SERVICE PIPING.GRADING &UTILITY PLAN1001020401" = 10 FEET1" = 10'GENERAL NOTES:1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAN IS TO PRESENT THE EXISTING SITE LAYOUTAND THE PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITION AND OUTSIDE STORAGE AREA.2. EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION IS BASED UPON THE UTILITY PLANFOR A NEW WAREHOUSE AND OFFICE BUILDING, SHEET LS-2, DATED03-15-1983 BY ALEXANDER / TRUEX / deGROOT, AND FIELD SURVEY BY THISOFFICE ON OCTOBER 18, 2019.3. EXISTING UTILITIES INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS OBTAINED FROMTHE ABOVE REFERENCED PLAN AND MAY NOT BE COMPLETE. THECONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY DIGSAFE AND THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTONPUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND WATER DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ANYEXCAVATION.4. BOUNDARY DATA IS BASED UPON A PLAN TITLED "COMMERCIALSUBDIVISION, BARTLETT PROPERTY" BY KREBS & LANSING CONSULTINGENGINEERS, INC., LAST REVISED 09-14-1982 AND RECORDED IN SLIDE 136 OFTHE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS.196LEGENDPROJECT BOUNDARYABUTTING PROPERTY LINEEXISTING CONTOUR24 HARBOR VIEW ROADSOUTH BURLINGTON, VTDateSheet numberScaleCheckedDrawnDesignSurveyProject No.Lamoureux & DickinsonConsulting Engineers, Inc.14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452802-878-4450 www.LDengineering.comDateRevisionByThese plans shall only be used for the purpose shown below:Sketch/ConceptPreliminaryFinal Local ReviewAct 250 ReviewConstructionRecord Drawing04-01-22DJGABRABR19108MJBEXISTING STORM PIPEEXISTING GAS LINEEXISTING SANITARY SEWER PIPESEXISTING BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHTEXISTING POLE MOUNTED LIGHTGEXISTING WATER LINE, VALVE, & HYDRANTWEXISTING TREE LINECHAIN LINK FENCE WITH MESH SCREENEXISTING EASEMENTCHAIN LINK FENCEBUILDING SETBACKSTORM STRUCTURE DATANEW CB1 (2' SUMP)RIM = 197.018" PE IN = 192.018" PE OUT = 191.0NEW CB2 (2' SUMP)RIM = 194.06" PVC UD IN = 191.5018" PE IN = 189.75EXISTING 18" RCP OUT = 189.65 (SET ON EXISTING PIPE)NEW CB3 (2' SUMP)RIM = 191.06" UD IN = 187.3312" PE OUT = 185.00EXISTING CB4RIM = 188.13EXISTING 12" IN = 183.93NEW 12" IN = 184.0EXISTING 12" OUT = 183.53NEW CB5 (4' DEEP SUMP)RIM = 195.508" PVC OUT = 190.65UTILITY RELOCATION NOTES:PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORMEXPLORATORY EXCAVATIONS TO CONFIRM THE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICALLOCATION OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES. EXCAVATION IN MULTIPLE LOCATIONSALONG EACH UTILITY LINE MAY BE REQUIRED. POTENTIAL CONFLICTS ANDAREAS OF INSUFFICIENT COVER SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ENGINEER.EXISTING UTILITY LINES WITH INSUFFICIENT COVER WITH THE PROPOSEDFINISH GRADES SHALL BE RE-LAID IN COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITYCOMPANY.PROPOSED BUILDING MOUNTED LIGHTPROPOSED POLE MOUNTED LIGHTPROPOSED TREE LINE196PROPOSED CONTOURPROPOSED UNDERDRIAN AND CLEANOUTUDPROPOSED CATCHBASIN AND STORM PIPEEXISTING ELECTRIC & TELECOM LINESE04-28-22REV ADDITION FOOTPRINT, EXIST 18" RCP STORM PIPEABR05-06-22ADD NOTE RE: EXPLORATORY EXCAVATION FOR EX. ROOF DRAINABR06-02-22ADJUST CB1/CB2, UTILITY SERVICE RELOCATION NOTESABRTHIS PLAN WAS ORIGINALLY PREPARED BY LAMOUREUX & DICKINSON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. EDITS TO THIS PLAN AFTER MAY 16, 2022 WERE PERFORMED BY TCE, INC. CLIENT AGREES TO INDEMNIFYAND HOLD HARMLESS TCE, INC. FROM ANY DAMAGES, LIABILITIES OR COSTS, INCLUDING REASONABLEATTORNEYS’ FEES AND DEFENSE COSTS, ARISING OR ALLEGEDLY ARISING FROM ANY NEGLIGENT ACTS,ERRORS OR OMISSIONS BY ANY PRIOR CONSULTANT RETAINED BY THE CLIENT FOR THIS PROJECT.
200200198200196
202198196198198196194190196192190202196202202EG198196 194192
HARBOR VIEW ROADEXISTING BUILDINGELECEDGE GRAVELEDGE PAVEMENTEXISTING ACESSORY STRUCTUREPROPOSEDBUILDINGADDITIONTYP. NEW BUILDINGMOUNTED LIGHTWWWWTYP. NEW POLEMOUNTED LIGHTWLIGHTING PLAN2002040801" = 20 FEET1" = 20'3THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFYAND OBTAIN A TICKET FROM"DIGSAFE" AT 811 PRIOR TO ANYEXCAVATION.4 HARBOR VIEW ROADSOUTH BURLINGTON, VTDateSheet numberScaleCheckedDrawnDesignSurveyProject No.Lamoureux & DickinsonConsulting Engineers, Inc.14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452802-878-4450 www.LDengineering.comDateRevisionByThese plans shall only be used for the purpose shown below:Sketch/ConceptPreliminaryFinal Local ReviewAct 250 ReviewConstructionRecord Drawing04-01-22DJGABRABR19108MJBLIGHTING SPECIFICATIONSLEGENDDESCRIPTIONMOUNT HEIGHTCOLOR TEMPRAB ALED3T78N 78WATT TYPE IIIPOLE MOUNT / 22 FEET4000KRAB WPLED26N 26WATT15' WALL MOUNT4000KAVERAGE ILLUMINATION LEVEL = 1.3 FOOTCANDLES (OUTSIDE STORAGE AND PARKING AREAS ONLY)NOTES:COLOR - FIXTURES AND POLES SHALL BE BRONZE - TO BE CONFIRMED WITH OWNERPOWER SUPPLY - COORDINATE WITH OWNER ON POWER SUPPLY LOCATION IN BUILDINGLIGHTING CONTROLS - LIGHTING CONTROL DESIGN SHALL BE BY THE OWNER'S ELECTRICIANCONDUIT SIZE & LAYOUT - CONDUIT SIZE AND LAYOUT DESIGN SHALL BE BY THE OWNER'S ELECTRICIANAPPENDIX A PERFORMANCE STANDARDS- NO LIGHT FIXTURES HAVE A MOUNTING HEIGHT GREATER THAN 30 FEET- THE MAXIMUM ILLUMINATION AT GROUND LEVEL DOES NOT EXCEED AN AVERAGE OF 3 FOOTCANDLES- ALL LIGHT FIXTURES ARE DOWNWARD DIRECTED TO MINIMIZE INDIRECT GLARE22W2222
200200198200196202
198196198198196194190196192190UDUDUD202196202202EG198196 194192 WWWWSSSSSGGGGGEEEHARBOR VIEW ROADEXISTING BUILDING13,000 SFD O C K P L A T F O R MOH DOOREDGE GRAVELEDGE PAVEMENTACESSORY STRUCTUREPROPOSEDBUILDINGADDITIONBIORETENTION AREA #1BIORETENTION AREA #2E X I S T I N G P A V E D D R I V ESTABILIZEDCONSTRUCTION EXIT(MIN LENGTH = 25')SWEEP EXISTING PAVEMENTAS NEEDED TO PREVENTSEDIMENT TRANSPORTTPZTPZTPZTPZEROSION PREVENTION &SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN20020401" = 20 FEET1" = 20'44 HARBOR VIEW ROADSOUTH BURLINGTON, VTDateSheet numberScaleCheckedDrawnDesignSurveyProject No.Lamoureux & DickinsonConsulting Engineers, Inc.14 Morse Drive, Essex, VT 05452802-878-4450 www.LDengineering.comDateRevisionByThese plans shall only be used for the purpose shown below:Sketch/ConceptPreliminaryFinal Local ReviewAct 250 ReviewConstructionRecord Drawing04-01-22DJGABRABR19108MJBSILT FENCE OR EROSION LOG (12" DIA)EPSC LEGENDSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITEROSION MATTINGINLET PROTECTIONEROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PERMIT REQUIREMENTSPRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, THE SITE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN CO-PERMITEE COVERAGE UNDER GENERALPERMIT 3-9020 WHICH REGULATES STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM CONSTRUCTION SITES.THIS PROJECT QUALIFIES AS HAVING A LOW RISK FOR IMPACTS TO WATER QUALITY, BASED UPON THEFOLLOWING:- LESS THAN 2 ACRES WILL BE DISTURBED AT ANY TIME- A MAXIMUM OF 21 CONSECUTIVE DAYS BEFORE DISTURBED EARTH IS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLYSTABILIZED.THESE CRITERIA FORM THE BASIS FOR THE LOW RISK DETERMINATION. ANY CHANGES TO THESE CRITERIAREQUIRE THAT THE RISK ANALYSIS BE RE-EVALUATED TO DETERMINE IF THE POTENTIAL RISK TO WATERQUALITY, AND THE RELATED PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS, HAVE CHANGED.6" MINEXISTING GROUNDOR SUBGRADEPUBLIC ROADWAYROADWAY25' MINPLANRIGHT-OF-WAYPUBLIC1-1/2" TO 2"DIA. STONEWIDTH OFPROFILE25' MIN FOR THIS SITEPUBLICRIGHT-OF-WAY4"-6"2.STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE5.6"1.12"12"6"12"6"2.4.5.3B.1.3A.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THELOW RISK SITE HANDBOOK FOR EROSION PREVENTION ANDSEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON THE SITE. AT A MINIMUM, THESE SHALL INCLUDE:- MARKING THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TO PRESERVE EXISTING VEGETATION OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OFCONSTRUCTION- LIMITING THE DISTURBED AREA TO THAT WHICH IS ACTIVELY BEING WORKED- INSTALLATION OF A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT- INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE ALONG THE DOWNSLOPE PERIMETER OF THE DISTURBED AREA ANDAROUND SOIL STOCKPILES- PLACEMENT OF EROSION MATTING IN CHANNELS, ON ALL SLOPES 3H:1V OR STEEPER, AND MULCHINGALL OTHER DISTURBED AREAS- SWEEPING PAVED AREAS TO REMOVE SEDIMENTEROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 7DAYS AND FOLLOWING PRECIPITATION EVENTS RESULTING IN RUNOFF. DURING THE WINTER CONSTRUCTIONPERIOD, INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED DAILY WHEN WORK IS UNDERWAY.SECTIONTPZLIMITS OF DISTURBANCETREE PROTECTION ZONE (CONTINUOUSCONSTRUCTION OR SNOW FENCE)05-06-22ADD TREE PROTECTION ZONEABR
4 Harbor View Road
Landscape Budget Calculation:
March 25, 2022
Estimated Building Cost:$660,000 (Addition only)
3% - First $250k $7,500
2%- 2nd $250k $5,000
1% Remaining $1,600
Total Required Budget:$14,100
Landscaping Cost Breakdown
Quantity Unit cost Extended Cost
Deciduous trees 10 $800 $8,000
Deciduous shrubs 7 $65 $455
Evergreen trees 38 $175 $6,650
Total proposed landscape budget: $15,105
FINDINGS OF FACT
STATE OF VERMONT
COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN , 06o0CITYOFSOUTHBURLINGTONS3
Re: Findings of Fact, application ofwestinghouse
Electric Corporation, Lot 3, Bartlett Property, Harboor View Road
On the _,. h of , March 1 83 the
South Bur ng-ton planning omm ss on aooroved or i the
request of in ouse Electric corporation
for site ro under Section 19j.Q of the South ur ng on Zoning Regu at ons based on the
following findings-,
1. TRAFFIC ACCESS - Joint access road serving lots 2 and 3 must be built
to City construction standards (24' width is acceptable). Depressed
cutb to be constructed across entrance.
2. CIRCULATION AND PARKING - Adequate as proposed.
3. LANDSCAPING SCREENING - Screening of the storage area shall be
reviewed after 1 year and may be required to be upgraded. Other
landscaping is satisfactory.
South Burlington Planning ommission