HomeMy WebLinkAboutAO-22-01 - Supplemental - 0410 Golf Course Road (9)
180 Market Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com
TO: South Burlington Development Review Board
FROM: Marla Keene, Development Review Planner
SUBJECT: AO-22-01 – 410 Golf Course Road
DATE: May 17, 2022 Development Review Board meeting
Appeal #AO-22-01 of Robert Cooper appealing the decision of the Zoning Administrative Officer to issue a
zoning permit for site improvements on a single family lot, 410 Golf Course Road. A memorandum describing
the background and facts of the case is included in the packet for the Board. This cover memorandum
summarizes the question to be decided by the Board.
The State statute governing appeals of the administrative officer’s decisions is as follows.
24 V.S.A. § 4465. Appeals of decisions of the administrative officer
(c) In the exercise of its functions under this section, a board of adjustment or development review board
shall have the following powers, in addition to those specifically provided for elsewhere in this chapter:
(1) To hear and decide appeals taken under this section, including, without limitation, where it is alleged
that an error has been committed in any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by an
administrative officer under this chapter in connection with the administration or enforcement of a
bylaw.
(2) To hear and grant or deny a request for a variance under section 4469 of this title.
In other words, the Board must stand in the shoes of the Zoning Administrative Officer determine whether an
error has been made in applying the Land Development Regulations.
The subject property received a zoning permit issued by Dalila Hall on March 21, 2022 (#ZP-22-071). The
appellant submitted a notice of appeal which was deemed complete by Staff on March 31, 2022.
A summary of the LDRs governing alteration of grade are as follows:
14.11 Site Plan and Conditional Use Review: Specific Uses and Standards
F. Alteration of Existing Grade
(1) Approval Required. The removal from land or the placing on land of fill, gravel, sand, loam, topsoil, or other
similar material in an amount equal to or greater than twenty (20) cubic yards, except when incidental to
or in connection with the construction of a structure on the same lot, shall require the approval of the
Development Review Board. The Development Review Board may grant such approval where such
modification is requested in connection with the approval of a site plan, planned unit development or
#AO-22-01
2
subdivision plat. This section does not apply to the removal of earth products in connection with a resource
extraction operation (see Section 14.11(G), Earth Products.)
(2 ) Standards and Conditions for Approval.
(a) The Development Review Board shall review a request under this Section for compliance with the
standards contained in this Section 14.11(F) and Section 3.07, Height of Structures of these regulations. An
application under this section shall include the submittal of a site plan, planned unit development or
subdivision plat application showing the area to be filled or removed, and the existing grade and proposed
grade created by removal or addition of material.
(b) The Development Review Board, in granting approval may impose any conditions it deems
necessary, including, but not limited to, the following:
(i) Duration or phasing of the permit for any length of time.
(ii) Submission of an acceptable plan for the rehabilitation of the site at the conclusion of the
operations, including grading, seeding and planting, fencing, drainage, and other appropriate
measures.
ii) Provision of a suitable bond or other security in accordance with Section 15.A.20 adequate to
assure compliance with the provisions of these Regulations.
(iv) Determination of what shall constitute pre-construction grade under Section 3.07, Height of
Structures.
There are three packages of testimony included in the packet for the Board:
1. Testimony of the Zoning Administrative Officer. This testimony describes the permitting timeline
and reasoning for issuance of a zoning permit.
2. Testimony of the appellant. This testimony contains a number of sections, some of which the
applicant correctly classifies as the basis of appeal and some of which the appellant categorizes as
requests for enforcement. Requests for enforcement are not within the authority of the Board to
adjudicate.
This testimony excerpts several sections of the LDR as applicable to their testimony. Staff notes the
section, 9.08A(4) Use of Berms only pertains the projects within the SEQ NRN. The subject
property is located in the SEQ-NR and therefore 9.08A(4) is not applicable.
3. Testimony of the permit holder. The permit holder is a party to the appeal but their actions are not
the subject of the appeal. The subject of the appeal is the decision of the administrative officer to
issue a permit for the work proposed in the zoning permit application.
Staff recommends the Board conduct the hearing as follows
o Ask who is seeking interested person status. Only interested persons can participate. The
following criteria of 24 V.S.A. § 4465 are the only ways in which someone could be considered an
interested person.
(1) A person owning title to property, or a municipality or solid waste management district
empowered to condemn it or an interest in it, affected by a bylaw, who alleges that the bylaw
imposes on the property unreasonable or inappropriate restrictions of present or potential use
#AO-22-01
3
under the particular circumstances of the case.
(2) The municipality that has a plan or a bylaw at issue in an appeal brought under this chapter or
any municipality that adjoins that municipality.
(3) A person owning or occupying property in the immediate neighborhood of a property that is the
subject of any decision or act taken under this chapter, who can demonstrate a physical or
environmental impact on the person's interest under the criteria reviewed, and who alleges that
the decision or act, if confirmed, will not be in accord with the policies, purposes, or terms of the
plan or bylaw of that municipality.
(4) Any ten persons who may be any combination of voters or real property owners within a
municipality listed in subdivision (2) of this subsection who, by signed petition to the
appropriate municipal panel of a municipality, the plan or a bylaw of which is at issue in any
appeal brought under this title, allege that any relief requested by a person under this title, if
granted, will not be in accord with the policies, purposes, or terms of the plan or bylaw of that
municipality. This petition to the appropriate municipal panel must designate one person to
serve as the representative of the petitioners regarding all matters related to the appeal.
(5) Any department and administrative subdivision of this State owning property or any interest in
property within a municipality listed in subdivision (2) of this subsection, and the Agency of
Commerce and Community Development of this State.
Ask each person seeking interested person status to identify themselves, provide contact
information, and demonstrate their eligibility using one of the above criteria.
o Determine who of those requesting interested person status is an interested person.
o Invite each party to provide testimony, in the following order.
• Zoning Administrative Officer – The zoning administrator can lay out the facts of the
zoning permit
• Appellant
• Permit Holder
• Other interested persons
The Chair may allow each party to provide a response to the testimony of others. Staff
recommends the Board proceed in the same order for each round of testimony.
o Once testimony has been provided, the Chair may allow public comments. The Board will
determine the weight to give public comment in its deliberations.
o Only if there are questions of fact should the hearing be continued; otherwise the hearing should
be concluded. The Board must render its decision within the standard 45-day timeframe.
Respectfully submitted,
Marla Keene, Development Review Planner
180 Market Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com
ATTACHMENTS
1. Zoning Permit ZP-22-071
2. Written testimony of the Zoning Administrative Officer
3. Written testimony of the appellant
4. Written testimony of the permit holder