Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSD-11-41 - Decision - 0119 Tilley Drive#SD-11-41 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLC — 119 TILLEY DRIVE PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION #SD-11-41 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking preliminary plat approval for a planned unit development consisting of a 45,000 sq. ft. medical office building, 119 Tilley Drive. The Development Review Board held a public hearing on December 20, 2011. Bob Bouchard represented the applicant. Based on testimony provided at the above mentioned public hearing and the plans and supporting materials contained in the document file for this application, the Development Review Board finds, concludes, and decides the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking preliminary plat approval for a planned unit development consisting of a 45,000 sq. ft. medical office building, 119 Tilley Drive. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is Pizzagalli Properties LLC. 3. The application was received on October 25, 2011 4. The subject property is located in the Industrial Open Space Zoning District. 5. The plan submitted consists of a 20 page set of plans; page two entitled "Mountain View Office Park Lot 6 Site Development" prepared by Donald L. Hamlin Consulting Engineers Inc, dated 9/16/11. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements IO Zoning District Required Proposed Min. Lot Size 3 acres 13.53 acres Max. Building Coverage 30% 3.8% Max. Overall Coverage 50% 21.6% Min. Front Setback 50 ft. >50 ft. Min. Side Setback 35 ft. >35 ft. CADocuments and Settings\Mark C. Behr\My Documents\South Burlington DRB\12.20.11 Meeting Decisions\SD_11_41_119TilleyDrive_ffd.doc #SD-11-41 Min. Rear Setback 150 ft. 1 >50 ft. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. The City Engineer has reviewed the plans and provided comments in a letter dated December 5, 2011. The applicant shall address the comments of the City Engineer per the letter dated December 5, 2011. Where necessary, the plans shall be revised prior to final plat approval. The applicant shall obtain preliminary wastewater allocation prior to final plat approval and final wastewater allocation prior to issuance of a zoning permit. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads Access to the subject lot is proposed via one two -directional curb -cut off of Tilley Drive. This curb cut is approximately 70 feet wide, narrowing quickly to a 30 foot entry drive. This entry drive will also serve as access to the rear portion of the lot at such time as that portion seeks development. 2 CADocuments and Settings\Mark C. Behr\My Documents\South Burlington DRB\12.20.11 Meeting Decisions\SD_11_41_119TilleyDrive_ffd.doc #SD-11-41 Under the terms of an existing 5-lot subdivision of lands access via Tilley Drive, the applicant is required to submit a trip generation and traffic analysis including turning movement analysis to be submitted as part of the review of the fourth building. The Board has required that this condition be carried through to include the subdivision that this lot is included within, should any of the lots proposed herein be developed prior to the existing lots. This will be the fourth building. The applicant submitted this analysis as part of an earlier application, approximately 18 months prior. The Board invoked a technical review of the traffic study and comments were received on January 28, 2010 from the Board's consultant (letter from RSG Inc). As this is a new application, the Board may require the study again. However, given that the size of the proposal has not changed, and that the conditions in the vicinity have not changed, the Board fords that the previous study and subsequent technical review is permitted to stand in this application, if the applicant so wishes. The applicant is proposing a 20 foot wide access drive around the front (south side) of the building. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site The plans show areas of wetlands located in the site. There is a fair-sized Class III wetland along the western edge of the property. This was shown on the sketch plan and in several previous iterations of preliminary and final plat applications, and the Board did not make any recommendations to move or otherwise reduce development within that wetland or buffer during any of those hearings. The applicant has also submitted a letter from a wetlands expert (see Gilman and Briggs, attached) dated May 2006 which delineates and evaluates this Class III wetland. The wetland consultant states that the wetlands do not degrade any of the functions and values: they are not capable of carrying enough floodwater to make an impact, there is no evidence of erosion or erosive forces, nor do they provide significant habitat for wildlife or fisheries. The Board finds the report to be written as a general assessment of class III wetlands rather than a thorough evaluation of this specific site. Still, as the applicant has also received approval from the US Army Corps of Engineers, and as the Board has had ample opportunity but not ever previously given any guidance or made any requests to the applicant to avoid the impacts, the Board does not advocate or support any changes to the plans with respect to this criteria and supports that the Class III impacts be permitted as part of this application. CADocuments and Settings\Mark C. Behr\My Documents\South Burlington DRB\12.20.11 Meeting Decisions\S D_11 _41 _119TilleyDrive_ffd.doc #SD-11-41 The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located Per section 15.18B of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, a PUD in the Industrial -Open Space District shall comply with the following standards: 1) Open space and development areas shall be located so as to maximize the aesthetic values of the property in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan goal of preserving and enhancing the open character, natural areas, and scenic views of the Quadrant, while allowing carefully planned development. 2) Open space and any buffering shall be located in a manner that minimizes impacts on adjacent residential uses, if any. Although this proposal is part of a larger lot, the current proposal requests development only to the front (south) of the lot. The proposed development does not directly abut the residential properties but rather is separated by one small lot, and the larger portion of the subject lot to the north of this one. The layout of the building and parking on the overall large site appears satisfactory with respect to this criterion. The landscaping plan shows two earthen berms to the western edge of the property, on directly adjacent to the residential district and a single family home to the northwest, and another along the mid -western boundary. This is a large lot for which development is currently only proposed closest to the road. The greatest opportunity for consideration of the above criteria shall be for portion of this lot to the north of the proposed development which directly abuts the residential properties and the farms/open space to the north. The Board will continue to review this property with respect to the criteria outlined in Section 15.18 B of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. See comments above on this matter. Again, the greatest opportunities to maximize opportunities for contiguous open space between adjoining properties are to the northern portion of the lot. The Board does not find that the proposed building, closest to the road and at the low point of the land, not most immediately adjacent to the residential district or existing agricultural and open land, jeopardizes the above criteria. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided 4 CADocuments and Settings\Mark C. Behr\My Documents\South Burlington DRB\12.20.11 Meeting Decisions\SD_11 _41 _119TilleyDrive_ffd.doc #SD-11-41 The Fire Chief has reviewed the plans and provided comments in a letter dated December 15, 2011. He is recommending that one of the fire hydrants be moved or otherwise be outside of a snow storage area. This should be addressed. There are additional standards that must be met with the construction of the building, including sprinkler and alarm systems. The applicant should address the concerns of the South Burlington Fire Chief per the letter dated December 15, 2011. Other specifications including sprinkler systems, alarm systems, and lock boxes must be met to the Fire Chiefs satisfaction prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The plans provide a safe access to the northern portion of the lot via the proposed access drive. It appears that the northern lot would be easily accessed via this drive without any unsafe trespass through the parking lot for the subject building. This is a very critical item of this review. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. It is already noted that the City Engineer has reviewed the plans and provided comments. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). The Board feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations, any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following_ general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. CADocuments and Settings\Mark C. Behr\My Documents\South Burlington DRB\12.20.11 Meeting Decisions\SD_11 _41_119TilleyDrive_ffd.doc C #SD-11-41 The site shows several areas of pedestrian considerations, including sidewalks around the building, and a paved sidewalk to the street. Based on 45,000 square feet of medical office use, the proposed building will require 225 parking spaces. 225 parking spaces are provided on site. Chapter 14.06 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations states the following: Parking. (a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Any side of a building facing a public street shall be considered a front side of a building for the purposes of this subsection. (b) The Development Review Board may approve parking between a public street and one or more buildings if the Board finds that one or more of the following criteria are met. The Board shall approve only the minimum necessary to overcome the conditions below. (i) The parking area is necessary to meet minimum requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act; (ii) The parking area will serve a single or two-family home; (iii) The lot has unique site conditions such as a utility easement or unstable soils that allow for parking, but not a building, to be located adjacent to the public street; (iv) The lot contains one or more existing buildings that are to be re -used and parking needs cannot be accommodated to the rear and sides of the existing building(s); or, (v) The principal use of the lot is for public recreation. (c) Where more than one building exists or is proposed on a lot, the total width of all parking areas located to the side of building(s) at the building line shall not exceed one half of the width of all building(s) located at the building line. Parking approved pursuant to 14.06(B) (2)(b) shall be exempt from this subsection. (d) For through lots, parking shall be located to the side of the building(s) or to the front of the building adjacent to the public street with the lowest average daily volume of traffic. Where a lot abuts an Interstate or its interchanges, parking shall be located to the side of the buildings) or to the front adjacent to the Interstate. Parking areas adjacent to the Interstate shall be screened with sufficient landscaping to screen the parking from view of the Interstate. C CADocuments and Settings\Mark C. Behr\My Documents\South Burlington DRB\12.20.11 Meeting Decisions\SD_1 1_41_119TilleyDrive_ffd.doc #SD-11-41 The proposed parking is in full compliance with these standards. Section 13.01(G) (5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is shown on drawing 2 of the plans. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The scale of the proposed buildings is compatible with the site and existing buildings in the area. The height of the proposed building is two stories and 28', which does not exceed the 28' height maximum for the district. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant has submitted architectural renderings. The proposed building appears to look very much like the other office buildings in the area with small changes. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. Again, the applicant has submitted architectural details. In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. The Board has already addressed the issue of the connection between this property and the areas of the lot to the west and north. CADocuments and Settings\Mark C. Behr\My Documents\South Burlington DRB\12.20.11 Meeting Decisions\SD_11_41_119TilleyDrive_ffd.doc #SD-11-41 Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans show a proposed dumpster, adequately screened. Landscaping Pursuant to Section 13.06(A) of the Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to site plan and PUD review. Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations requires parking facilities to be curbed and landscaped with appropriate trees, shrubs, and other plants including ground covers. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B) (4) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas must be shown on the plans. The plans show snow storage areas for the subject property. Landscaping budget requirements are to be determined pursuant to Section 13.06(G) (2) of the SBLDR. The landscape plan and landscape budget shall be prepared by a landscape architect or professional landscape designer. Based on $3,600,000 in construction costs, the minimum landscaping budget shall be $43,500. The applicant has submitted an itemized landscaping budget of $53,280 in new trees and shrubs. The City Arborist has reviewed the plans. His comments are incorporated into the December 5, 2011 letter from the Director of Public Works. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the City Arborist. Where necessary, the plans shall be revised prior to final plat submittal. The proposed parking areas contain more than twenty (20) parking spaces, and therefore should be landscaped in accordance with Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations. The site plan shows some proposed landscaping on the interior of the proposed parking area. However, the applicant should submit additional information to ensure that the requirements in Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations are being met. The applicant has submitted a plan showing the landscaping in the interior of the proposed parking area. The requirements in Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations are being met as the plans depict a 13.2% interior landscaping achievement. CADocuments and Settings\Mark C. Behr\My Documents\South Burlington DRB\12.20.11 Meeting Decisions\SD_11_41_119TilleyDrive_ffd.doc #SD-11-41 Lighting Pursuant to Appendix A.9 of the Land Development Regulations, luminaries shall not be placed more than 30' above ground level and the maximum illumination at ground level shall not exceed an average of three (3) foot candles. Pursuant to Appendix A.10 (b) of the Land Development Regulations, indirect glare produced by illumination at ground level shall not exceed 0.3 foot candles maximum, and an average of 0.1 foot candles average. All lighting shall be shielded and downcast. The applicant has submitted a lighting point by point plan and lighting cut -sheets which are in full compliance with the Land Development Regulations. DECISION Motion by Joe Randazzo, seconded by William Stuono, to approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-11-41 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, subject to the following conditions: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations shall remain in full effect except as amended herein. 2. This project shall be completed as shown on the plat submitted by the applicant and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. 3. The applicant shall obtain preliminary wastewater allocation prior to final plat approval and final wastewater allocation prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 4. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. 5. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. 6. The applicant shall adhere to the recommendations of the traffic consultant based on the letter from RSG dated January 28, 2009. 7. The applicant shall address the comments of the City Engineer per the letter dated December 5, 2011. Where necessary, the plans shall be revised prior to final plat approval. 9 CADocuments and Settings\Mark C. Behr\My Documents\South Burlington DRB\12.20.11 Meeting Decisions\SD_11_41_119TiIleyDrive_ffd.doc #SD-11-41 8. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the City Arborist. Where necessary, the plans shall be revised prior to final plat submittal. 9. The applicant shall address the concerns of the South Burlington Fire Chief per the letter dated December 15, 2011. Other specifications including sprinkler systems, alarm systems, and lock boxes must be met to the Fire Chief s satisfaction prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 10. The plat shall be revised to show the changes below prior to final plat submission: a. Where necessary, the plans shall be revised based on the comments of the City Engineer b. Where necessary, the plans shall be revised based on the comments of the Fire Chief c. Where necessary, the plans shall be revised based on the comments of the City Arborist. 11. The final plat application shall be submitted within 12 months. Tim Barritt—_Xel/nay/abstain/not present Mark Behr —lea/nay/abstain/not present Matthew Birmingham — yea/nay/abstain/not present Roger Farley — yea/nay/abstain/not present Joe Randazzo—,yea/nay/abstain/not present Michael Sirotkin — yea/nay/abstain/not present Bill Stuono —yea/nay/abstain/not present Motion carried by a vote of 5 — 0 — 0 Signed this 21" day of December 2011, by Digitally signed by Mark C. Behr Mark C. Behr h cn=Madc C. Behr, o=Richard Henry Behr Architect P.C., ou, email=mark@rhbpc.conb c=US Date: 2011.12.21 13:30:36 -0S'00' Mark Behr, Chairman Please note: An appeal of this decision may be taken by filing, within 30 days of the date of this decision, a notice of appeal and the required fee by certified mail to the Superior Court, Environmental Division. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b). A copy of the notice of appeal must also be mailed to the City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department at 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT 05403. See V.R.E.C.P. 5(b)(4)(A). Please contact the Environmental Division at 802-828-1660 or http://vennontiudiciM.org/GTC/environmental/default.aspx for more information on filing requirements, deadlines, fees and mailing address. 10 C:\Documents and Settings\Mark C. Behr\My Documents\South Burlington DRB\12.20.11 Meeting Decisions\SD_11_41_119TilleyDrive_ffd.doc #SD-11-41 The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call 802.879.5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 11 CADocuments and Settings\Mark C. Behr\My Documents\South Burlington DRB\12.20.11 Meeting Decisions\SD_11 _41 _119Ti I IeyDrive_ffd.doc