Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0047 Tilley DriveAGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATERSHED MANAGEMENT DIVISION MAIN BUILDING, SECOND FLOOR ONE NATIONAL LIFE DRIVE MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05620-3522 NOTICE: DRAFT DISCHARGE PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: August 14, 1014 - September 12, 2014 PERMITTEE INFORMATION PERMITTEE NAME: PERMITTEE ADDRESS: PERMIT NUMBER: PROJECT ID NUMBER: DISCHARGE INFORMATION NATURE: Treated stormwater VOLUME: As necessary Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 346 Shelburne Road, Suite 601 Burlington, VT 05401 3622-INDS.R1 EJO1-0291 RECEIVING WATER: Unnamed tributary of Potash Brook EXPIRATION DATE: Five years from issuance date of final permit DESCRIPTION: This is a draft discharge permit proposed for issuance to Pizzagalli Properties, LLC for the discharge of stormwater runoff from Mountain View Business Park - Lot B located on Tilley Drive in South Burlington, Vermont to an unnamed tributary of Potash Brook. The means of treatment includes a grass lined swale and detention basin. TENTATIVE DETERMINATIONS The Secretary has determined that the permitted discharges satisfy Vermont's Anti -degradation Policy provided in Section 1-03 of the Vermont Water Quality Standards and the Department of Environmental Conservation's Interim Anti -degradation Implementation Procedure because the applicant has demonstrated how the proposed development will implement practices and offset projects as necessary to ensure water quality is maintained in receiving waters. In particular, the applicant has demonstrated how the proposed development will implement appropriate best management practices (BMPs) designed in accordance with the requirements of the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual, Volume I and as necessary offset projects in accordance with Chapter 22: Stormwater Management Rule for Stormwater-Impaired Waters. These BMPs and offset projects where necessary will manage and mitigate the proposed stormwater discharge from the project such that no lowering of water quality is expected to occur in the receiving waters. FURTHER INFORMATION For information on the application, access to related documents, including the draft permit, the Vermont Water Quality Standards (including § 1-03 Anti -degradation Policy) or the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual, interested persons should contact: Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation Watershed Management Division Main Building, Second Floor Montpelier, VT 05620-3522 Telephone: 802-828-153 5 Copies, obtained by calling (802) 828-1535, will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for Copying Public Records from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS Written public comments on the proposed permit are invited and must be received on or before the close of business day (7:45 am - 4:30 pm) September 12, 2014, by the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Watershed Management Division, Stormwater Management Program, Main Building, Second Floor, One National Life Drive, Montpelier, Vermont 05620-3522 or send via email to am wsmdstormwatercomments&state.vt.us. If sending by mail, the permit number should appear next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the first page of any submitted comments. If sending by e-mail, the permit number should appear on the subject line. All comments received by the above date will be considered in formulation of the final determinations. During the notice period, any.person may submit a written request to this office for a public informational meeting to consider the proposed permit. The request must state the interest of the party filing such request and the reasons why a meeting is warranted. A public informational meeting will be held if there is a significant public interest (including the filing of requests or petitions for such meeting) in holding such a meeting. RIGHTS TO APPEAL At the conclusion of the public notice period and after consideration of additional information received during the public notice period, the VANR will make a final determination to issue or to deny the permit. Renewable Energy Projects — Right to Appeal to Public Service Board Any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Vermont Public Service Board pursuant to 10 V.S.A. §8506 within 30 days of the date of this decision. The appellant must file with the Clerk an original and six copies of its appeal. The appellant shall provide notice of the filing of an appeal in accordance with 10 V.S.A. §8504(c)(2), and shall also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal on the Vermont Department of Public Service. For information, see the Rules and General orders of the Public Service Board available on line at www.psb.vermont.gov. The address for the Public Service Board is 112 State Street Montpelier, Vermont 05620-2701 (Tel. #802-828-2358). All Other Projects — Right to Appeal to Environmental Court Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $250.00, payable to the state of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.ven,nontjudiciary.org. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. # 802-828-1660). David K. Mears, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATERSHED MANAGEMENT DIVISION MAIN BUILDING, SECOND FLOOR ONE NATIONAL LIFE DRIVE MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05620-3522 NOTICE: DRAFT DISCHARGE PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: May 22, 2014 - June 20, 2014 PERMITTEE INFORMATION PERMITTEE NAME: PERMITTEE ADDRESS: PERMIT NUMBER: PROJECT ID NUMBER: DISCHARGE INFORMATION NATURE: Treated stormwater VOLUME: As necessary Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 346 Shelburne Road, Suite 601 Burlington, VT 05401 5395-INDS.R EJO1-0291.01 RECEIVING WATER: Unnamed tributary of Potash Brook EXPIRATION DATE: Five years from issuance date of final permit DESCRIPTION: This is a draft discharge permit proposed for issuance to Pizzagalli Properties, LLC for the discharge of stormwater runoff from Mountain View Business Park - Lot A located on Tilley Drive in South Burlington, Vermont to an unnamed tributary of Potash Brook. This permit renews the previously issued discharge permit 5395-INDS for the same project. The means of treatment includes grass swales and a detention basin. TENTATIVE DETERMINATIONS The Secretary has determined that the permitted discharges satisfy Vermont's Anti -degradation Policy provided in Section 1-03 of the Vermont Water Quality Standards and the Department of Environmental Conservation's Interim Anti -degradation Implementation Procedure because the applicant has demonstrated how the proposed development will implement practices and offset projects as necessary to ensure water quality is maintained in receiving waters. In particular, the applicant has demonstrated how the proposed development will implement appropriate best management practices (BMPs) designed in accordance with the requirements of the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual, Volume I and as necessary offset projects in accordance with Chapter 22: Stormwater Management Rule for Stormwater-Impaired Waters. These BMPs and offset projects where necessary will manage and mitigate the proposed stormwater discharge from the project such that no lowering of water quality is expected to occur in the receiving waters. FURTHER INFORMATION For information on the application, access to related documents, including the draft permit, the Vermont Water Quality Standards (including § 1-03 Anti -degradation Policy) or the Vermont Stormwater Management Manual, interested persons should contact: Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation Watershed Management Division Main Building, Second Floor Montpelier, VT 05620-3522 Telephone: 802-828-153 5 Copies, obtained by calling (802) 828-1535, will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for Copying Public Records from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETINGS Written public comments on the proposed permit are invited and must be received on or before the close of business day (7:45 am - 4:30 pm) June 20, 2014, by the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Watershed Management Division, Stormwater Management Program, Main Building, Second Floor, One National Life Drive, Montpelier, Vermont 05620-3522 or send via email to am.wsmdstormwatercommentsnstate.vt.us. If sending by mail, the permit number should appear next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the first page of any submitted comments. If sending by e-mail, the permit number should appear on the subject line. All comments received by the above date will be considered in formulation of the final determinations. During the notice period, any person may submit a written request to this office for a public informational meeting to consider the proposed permit. The request must state the interest of the party filing such request and the reasons why a meeting is warranted. A public informational meeting will be held if there is a significant public interest (including the filing of requests or petitions for such meeting) in holding such a meeting. RIGHTS TO APPEAL At the conclusion of the public notice period and after consideration of additional information received during the public notice period, the VANR will make a final determination to issue or to deny the permit. Renewable Energy Projects — Right to Appeal to Public Service Board Any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Vermont Public Service Board pursuant to 10 V.S.A. §8506 within 30 days of the date of this decision. The appellant must file with the Clerk an original and six copies of its appeal. The appellant shall provide notice of the filing of an appeal in accordance with 10 V.S.A. §8504(c)(2), and shall also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal on the Vermont Department of Public Service. For information, see the Rules and General orders of the Public Service Board available on line at www.psb.vennont.gov. The address for the Public Service Board is 112 State Street Montpelier, Vermont 05620-2701 (Tel. #802-828-2358). All Other Projects — Right to Appeal to Environmental Court Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $250.00, payable to the state of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.vennontjudiciar�org. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. # 802-828-1660). David K. Mears, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation I DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 16 MARCH 2O10 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 16 March 2010, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: J. Dinklage, Chair; M. Behr, E. Knudsen, R. Farley, M. Birmingham, B. Stuono Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; C. LaRose, Associate Planner; B. Bouchard, T. Cutler, B. Nedde, J. Olinger, P. Steinman, L. Bresee, R. DeYoung, M. Young, M. Holly, J. Fellssnfer, B. Armstrong, 1. Other Business & Announcements: No issues were raised. 2. Minutes of 16 February 2010: Mr. Behr moved to approve the Minutes of 16 February 2010 as written. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 3. Final Plat Application #SD-10-04 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, to amend a previously approved three -lot subdivision. The amendment consists of combining lots #6 & #7 into one lot totaling 13.53 acres, 47 Tilley Drive: Mr. Belair said staff had no issues. Mr. Knudsen noted that the lots on the plan are still mislabeled as #6 & #7. The applicant agreed to correct the plat so it is just shown as lot #6, deleting all reference to lot V. The applicant also agreed to Condition #3. Mr. Behr moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-10-04 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended. Mr.' Farley seconded: Motion passed unanimously. 4. Continued Preliminary Plat Application #SD-09-51 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, for a planned unit development to construct a 50,000 sq. ft. office building, 119 Tilley Drive: Mr. Bouchard read a note from Jay Nadeau at CWD regarding covering transmission mains. In order for them not to have parking in front, they would have to create an 11-foot grade change from one level of parking to another. To maintain a 5% grade, they would have to move the parking lot back 150 feet. To avoid this, they have shown 20% of the parking up front. The rest is on the side or in back. Mr Dinklage said he wasn't sure topography was a compelling excuse. He felt employees could use parking in the road even with the grade change. Mr. Stuono suggested moving the building forward to make it more pedestrian friendly. Mr. Bouchard said Interested Persons Record and Service List i Efi S'.0 N'f Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At -any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each per-son.wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The-DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who -has sought interested person status. - 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of -any decision rendered by the DRB must be.mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice an appeal to the -environmental- court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant inefive �w,orrkingdays. 24 V.S.A. § 4471-(c). HEARING DATE: M�11'(( // 16 - "16 l e) PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY! NAME MAII 1Nr, ennRGcc Inr3r'1 ICr`T r'%r ikvrr-mr-e%r Jt 1 to AJC_SCJ S� 4- I r A41 uCQ 6/7— e Gd LC J i�2 V-P q('ji 0(Z 2,1 Interested Persons Record and Service List south' t-E 8.y.0N; Under the 2004 revisions tC Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an -opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the -applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and -participation of each person who has sought interested -person status 24 V.S.A.- §_4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing -and -having been .heard -by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice.of an appeal_to_the environmental _court, the DRB must supply a list -of interested persons to the appellant in five -working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: � � �f k PLEASE- -PRINT CLEARLY NAME Men lAl!_ nnnot7c-c- __ . ___ 11 . ! /-'T �-'-'( `e{��v�` � �wa�<.v1 yr IIv`�1C��KpC[J1 *7 south-- - PLANNING & ZONING March 22, 2010 Brian Armstrong and Lora Wilson 50 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Pizzagalli Dear Sir or Madam: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Enc. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com March 19, 2010 Robert Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 47 Tilley Drive Dear Mr. Bouchard: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on March 16, 2010 (effective 3/16/2010). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the land records (in mylar format) Within 180 days (must be submitted to Ray Belair for recording along with an $13 recording fee per mylar by September 13, 2010) or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 33 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7009 0820 0002 2430 27 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: March 8, 2010 \drb\sub\pizzagalli\final_combinelots6and7.doc Application received: February 8, 2010 PIZZAGALLI 47 Tilley Drive FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-10-04 enda #3 Meeti Owner/Applicant Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 50 Joy Drive S. Burlington, VT 05403 Engineer Donald Hamlin Consulting Engineers, Inc 136 Pearl Street Essex Junction, VT Location Map Date: March 16, 2010 Contact Robert Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 50 Joy Drive S. Burlington, VT 05403 Property Information Tax Parcel 1718-00047 Industrial Open Space Zoning District CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\final combinelots6and7 doc Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking final plat approval to combine lots #6 and 7 into one (1) building lot totaling 13.53 acres, 47 Tilley Drive. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on February 8, 2010 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements Lots #1-3 10 Zoning District Required Proposed �l Min. Lot Size 3 acres 13.53 acres Max. Building Coverage 30% n/a Max. Overall Coverage 50% n/a �l Min. Front Setback 50 ft. n/a �l Min. Side Setback 35 ft. n/a �l Min. Rear Setback 50 ft. n/a �l zoning compliance n/a no buildings are proposed as part of this application SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. The City of South Burlington Water Department reviewed the plans for the subject project and most recently stated that they have no formal comments on the plans. They will seek further review of the plans at such time as land development is proposed. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. Although no infrastructure or land development is proposed as part of this application, the applicant, upon advice of staff, obtained preliminary wastewater allocation as part of the 3-lot CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\final combinelots6and7.doc subdivision that this lot was most recently subject to. Final allocation will be assessed at such time as buildings are proposed. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. There are no roadways or buildings proposed as part of this application. At this time, it is merely a merger of two lots. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. The traffic management strategies from the previous decision will remain in effect. They are reiterated verbatim here for clarity. 1. At such time as Interstate Exit 12B is constructed to Tilley Drive with a north bound off ramp, the access drive located between lots 6& 8 shall be abandoned in favor of a new access drive to be located as far to the east as possible. 2. All future site plans for the lots created herein shall be designed so as to provide adequate and efficient circulation such that traffic shall most generally be directed away from the Hinesburg Road intersection. 3. Access to the proposed lots shall be via Tilley Drive. No access shall be permitted via Old Farm Road. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The plans that the applicant submitted depict Class II I wetlands on the subject property. These wetlands extend into the area where the access to the lots will likely be located. Staff will further assess impacts to wetlands as the access drives and buildings are proposed. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Per section 15.18B of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, a PUD in the Industrial -Open Space District shall comply with the following standards: 1) Open space and development areas shall be located so as to maximize the aesthetic values of the property in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan goal of preserving and enhancing the open character, natural areas, and scenic views of the Quadrant, while allowing carefully planned development. 2) Open space and any buffering shall be located in a manner that minimizes impacts on adjacent residential uses, if any. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\final combinelots6andTdoc It is difficult to assess compliance with this criterion as no land development is proposed at this time. The applicant has noted the required 65 foot buffer adjacent to the residential zone. Staff will assess these criteria thoroughly at such time as buildings are proposed on individual lots. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. As previously stated, no buildings or other land development are proposed as part of this application. Staff will assess this criterion at such time as more detail is provided. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. Until such time as the road network and buildings are proposed, there is no need for review by the Fire Department. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee has stated that they will review the plans when at such time as buildings are proposed; as with most other items included in this report, it is difficult to properly plan for infrastructure improvements until such time as buildings are proposed. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. Again, the South Burlington Recreation Path Committee reviewed the sketch plans for the proposed project at its meeting on Monday March 1, 2004. 4. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Until such time as the road network and buildings are proposed, there is no need for review by the City Engineer. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\final combinelots6andTdoc The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Until such time as the road network and buildings are proposed, it is not possible to assess these criteria. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. No buildings are proposed as part of this application. This criterion will be assessed as individual buildings are proposed for each lot. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. No buildings are proposed as part of this application. This criterion will be assessed as individual buildings are proposed for each lot. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant should submit architectural details with the site plans for each individual lot. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant should submit architectural details with the site plans for each individual lot In addition to the above general review standards site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. At this time, Staff does not find a need for any additional access easements. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\gizzagalli\final combinelots6and7.doc Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans do not show any dumpsters. The site plans for the individual lots should depict proposed dumpsters, adequately screened. Landscaping Pursuant to Section 13.06(A) of the Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to site plan and PUD review. Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations requires parking facilities to be curbed and landscaped with appropriate trees, shrubs, and other plants including ground covers. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(4) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas must be shown on the plans. The plans do not snow storage areas for the subject property. However, the proposed public roadway will utilize the public right-of-way for snow storage, so additional snow storage areas are not necessary for the proposed subdivision. However, staff notes that adequate snow storage areas should be depicted on the site plans for each individual lot. Landscaping budget requirements are to be determined pursuant to Section 13.06(G)(2) of the Land Development Regulations. The landscape plan and landscape budget shall be prepared by a landscape architect or professional landscape designer. All of the proposed parking areas on the subject property should be landscaped in accordance with Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations. The site plans for each individual lot should be revised to incorporate the landscaping provisions outlined in Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Final Plat application #SD-10-04 subject to the numbered items in the comments section of this report. Respectfully submitted, Rose, Associate Planner Copy to: Robert Bouchard, contact for applicant DS OF LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OF I VEIMEN FAMILY�LIMITED PARTNERS P v,1 r'vvyrYy-n-v+�rrwy'Y'v /•r �'��-'r'"�v�Y�"ry r'` DANIEL J. & SANDRA T. O'BRIEN VOLUME 420, PAGE 345 / VOLUME 74, PAGE 419 NOTES MAP VOLUME 430. PAGE 75 I (LU �)'vv Yvv i+ 1127.9I% / \ Y�IJAP`9'J)7i N0. 425 p/S7WG�_ ,�jp- E FOUND 1/2 SIEFl PIPE / 2.yy' h MAP SLIDE NO. 425 _ ljaCIIL N e3 1. SEE PLAN ENTITLED "PLAN SHOWING PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINE REVISIONS ROY. WHIGHT (UPN:. N e4R0'2B' E \\ t yy 2 FOUND ALUMINUM PLAD1 "" - T v � r~' �xjn IN1K15iNLV'�cF_"G,�. .I I ,T ,..}-'`Jl✓ t a TILLEY FARM OLD FARM ROAD 50. BURLINGTON. VERMONT' PREPARED BY WARREN A SEE NO 1 51 N,y�ey)•v7' Yry v Y (a;) - 2 pIS% N 84'2021L7T`'.,'.,-y.�(.SE€i y r �� q F ,`./••""t.•. FOUND 1 2� S1EEL PIPE ROBENSTIEN. L.S. DATED JUNE 1983, LAST REVISED FEBRUARY 1987. AND FILED IN MAP 119.7� Y V �Y')^vwv. yy_ l - (') TAT _ I p aP I ,.t / VOLUME 252, PACE 88 OF THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. I I ''Y` / \ - }` I E IN � I ��f I, ,)`moo J 4- STEEL PIPE (UP 0.3') -� �- \ 119.71� ) r-�j pR'12'01 (10) 1�T I f \, ,.,\(UP O.BS'),... BEE NOTE 1 2. SEE PLAN ENTITLED 'PRZAGAW PROPERTIES, LLC P. 0. BOX ZOOS SOUTH BURLINGTON. _ I / N! 11 31� J } ) P! 1 I -/-I _�jy,� l J:/ SFE NOTE"I VERMONT 05403-2008 BOUNDARY PLAT SHOVING SUBDIVISION OF LANDS OF PIZZAGALU \ / �_ ^ / %,,./J•j / / l / yARp �P S / I II I } PROPERTIES. LLC HINESBURC ROAD SOUTH BURUNCTON, VERMONT' PREPARED BY DONAD \ �- \,.t .: / / Zooz AND FILED IN MAP SLIDES NO. IN404 C. DATED THE ASOUTH BURLINGTON LOUD RECORDS & \ /��¢!\-� ) \ I / FOUND 3/8' STEEL PN J"- ^'( I ' ?5 MpUryUARY DETAL I 1111E 1tnLE/Y 1 ( 1 7• 3. SEE PLAN ENTITLED 'SUBDIVISION PLAN DANIEL J. O'BRIEN a LEO O'BRIEN JR OT7RIFN \�`� L'�/ (UP 0.47 `t'�^ $1 I / I / I I I 'ROPERW llllNEP 1 1 l I '1 \/ HOME FARM KIMBALL AVENUE AND OLD FARM ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT' SEE NOTE 1 T• ) /�'/ / PREPARED BY KREBS a LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEERS. INC. DATED NOVEMBER 18. 1996, BOUNDARY DETAIL K LAST REVISED JULV 29. 2003. AND FILED IN MAP AIDE NO. 425 OF THE SOUTH NOT N BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS ^.4•r�,:,; ) \ \ ( \ I ( I { I / 4. SEE RECORD OF SURVEY ENTITIFD *PLAN SHOWING PROPOSED SUB-DIMSON OF TILLEY LANDS OF {• YZ \ \\ \\I \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \I \ I II(I RECEIVED FARM OLD FARM RD. S0. BURLINGTON. VT.' PREPARED BY WARREN A ROBENSTIEN, L S.. DOUGLAS DICKEY YC, f DATED JUNE 1983. REVISED THROUGH MARCH 1985, AND RECORDED IN MAP VOLUME 197, VOLUME 8e7, PAGE 579 ONEL �^ Ig, q� \ON LAND RECORDS.\ \ I \\ \\ \ \ 1 \ \( I I I I I I I a Ir 7' 5. PAGE 65 OF THE *ROY PARCELS' TH BUR SEE HIGHWAY PLANSENTIT.ED "STAATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS INTERSTATE MAP VOLUME 252. PAGE 86 , "'/ r 'l la 1w \\ 1 g \ \I I I 1 1 1\ I II m 1 I I I p ( I I ( I1II I j 1 0� PROJECT IN THE TOWN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON RELOCATION HINESBURC ROAD' PROJECT NO. ,�xA�; g 1 I I I I I 1 y '� Q 2010 I-89-3(14) PREPARED BY VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS• SHEETS 22 AND 23. ^." .� W000 �' T"' f I \ \ IWi \ 1 1 I I I I ) ^ I I I I / / J I r I �, FEB 0 U 8. THE BARER S OF BEARINGS WAS OBTAINED FROM A FIELD TRAVERSE TO NGS STATIONS PC1965 r^'V .! 1N AND A13 9665 AND IS REFERENCED TO VERMONT STATE PLANE COORDINATES - NAD83. 7. THE SUBJECT LANDS ARE LOCATED IN THE INDUSTRIAL -OPEN SPACE ZONING DISTRICT. SEE (JN)--�1 I \ \ I I I I I I I I (I / I I 1 I l 11 / l Il ARTICLES 3, 8.04. AND APPENDIX C-2 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND DEVELOPMENT +JB'SO' 1N!> ZOPaN SPI a 1 \I \ \\ 1 I I I I I i I 1 i I I I j i ! / / / r I r { �jfty Of So. Bunington REGULATORS ADOPTIU MAY 12. 2003 WITH AMENDMENTS EFFECTIVE JANUARY 5. 2009. - M eS C I e. SEE PLAN ENTITLED 'SUBDIMSON PUT ESTATE OF RUSSELL R. TILLEY' PREPARED BY BUTTON / (IO) /- \ \ \ \ I I I �7 I I I I I I I I I I/? VICINITY M A P PR ESSIONAL LAND OF THE SOUTi BURUNGTOVN LOUAISDP E DATED APRIL 1. ZOOS AND FILED IN MAP ALOE N0. 450 1' //N.\I 1\ I \I 1\�I1 f, ( ! i I I i ) / I I ( 1 I I / I I I 11 II II Y 'C N T S 9. CORDS THE SUBJECT LANDS MAY BE SUBJECT TO SEWAGE OVERFLOW RI GI Is FIRST GRANTED BY { IOU `�.. r y/ \ _-1- 1 1 I J1\ I I 1 I I I I I I// I I I 1 I 1 1 I ; 5 R011N L AND HELEN M. TILLEY IN THEIR WARRANTY DEED TO HIRAM F. AND FANNIE R. TILLEY. { (�'-;; - ���_��� '-'ENT ( I / I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I I / 1 1 I I / / I I I 191I I / S DATED APRIL 3. 1962 AND RECORDED APRIL S. 1962 IN VOLUME 61. PAGE 156 OF THE SOUTH < y i '2 BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. PREVIOUS OWNERS OF THE LANDS NOW OF ARMSTRONG a NILSON. \ a ' F \\ / 1 , I J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 III / < LEGEND < =(� 11011iW-r ilHluo -Po3D\ _ _ • J I ( \ I IIIIII 1 I / 1q I l / r i /_ ENCROACH \ _- / I I I I I I ! / ! / ( / / / EI FOUN➢ VAOT 4• BY 4• CONCRETE HONUMENT I I I I I I I I I I l l l l! 11 // // �/ }I S LANDS 1 L 1�\ PORTONAGALU OF VOLUME PACE 736 PROPOSED 4• BY 4• CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND 3/B' STEEL PIN < j \ \ \ ` ` \ \- _ _ _ / I / 1 I 1 I I I I I I / 1 / I I 1 / / / / l / / m (LOT 2) (SEE NOTE 1) i ��. \ -` , / I I 1 1 J / ) 1 I / / / / / MAP DE NO. 445 • PROPOSED 3/4 STEEL PIPE )7) }~ PORTION OF PARCEL NO. 2 LANDS OF •� �FYIUND S�B'\SIEF.L\PIM \ \-` / / / l I I I I I I I I I l I I l I I l 1 , / / , Ivj. MAP VOL. 197, PAGE 65 O FOUND STEEL PIN (DIAMETER AND ORIGIN AS NOTED) / B. T. ARMSTRONG k L J. WILSON ,Np� tt \ \ \ \ 1 I 1 1 I 1 / VOLUME 462. PAGE 316 ' / I 1 1 I I l / I /! O FOUND STEEL PIPE (INSIDE DIAMETER AND ORIGIN AS NOTED) so, WRIGHT PARCELS' : _ - •(\ \ \ C, ` ` } // i l l / l l 1 I / I I I I I I 1 / l / 1 / Y l l A POINT NOT IQARQNTED CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON MAP VOLUME 252• PAGE Be 49.OT mil(((` \ \�\\\ \\ \�_`-, ,., / / / / / / 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I I / ! l 1 / 1 / 1 / Ijl l HIGHWAYUBLE RIGHT RECORDS VOLOUMEA1. PAGE , / S w�'�' w \\ \� \ \\\� \\ __-\\ // // / 1 /!/ J // UTILITY POLE WITH OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES CRD/.•../ / 1� / /j / j /l/l l IIYYI/ / l/ /// / Y ? - 7 hWNOD R7VL MONETH \EARTH \ i / / I / / j 1 / / / / l I / l 1 / l / / l 1 / ` Z \ A, DWEL FlIJv a\4'1 DII PIPE .•,.,., APPROXIMATE EDGE OF WDOOED AREA k,I\�x` ' \ \ \ //` / /// , l/IIlIJ II1 111 / FOUND 3/ B' STEEL PIN • _ 1 \ \ \ \ \ ti\" / / / / / / I l / / / l l I / / / 1 I I 1 / / ! l �/ / ,� - LAND BOUNDARY LINE I 5(U NOTE 1 ` a /^\ 1\ 1/ I 1 \\ \ \ \\� //� /// / / // / / / / 1 I I l 1 / / %I / 11 / l 1 / // i -_-- EASEMENT UNE W - APPROX. WATER MAIN ;Y --G--APPROX.S-APPROX.SANITARY SEVER LINE WITH MANHOLE `\ ti --�eo1• . , ./Dasvri.Ei r I I \ \ \ 1 \ \ t i I /i / / / / / i //i /// / //i i// // l / 1 // / l (. $ N fIL2e M- APPROX SANITARY FORCEMAN N;PQ�8' \wy \\ I \\/ \ \\ \\\\ \ \ I\ 1\ // / / / /// / /, / / // / / I WOOD RAIL FENCE OW OF CONIFER S ENCR PI - \ SEE TE �) \ \ \ \ l {'r '%) / / / / / / / / / / / / / / l �/ / l L �� / ___395 EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR UNE BINMINOUS \ / lI�-Y\ xECDRb�/1 1 1 11 \ WAIEPoIGE \1'vERN\NG�.%1j/ // // / / ///// / /// / / // ZONING DISTRICT LINE I ••` I .+_ •` J I TAN o; B ROADWAYS �. F••_ • 1 aRtOR RET _Elg]IiYT REWROt �t / / i / I / I11(1 __-_ - _-_. /1.r.L�-k-- -__Jcuss 3 WEaANps L�-%.{/ W--_..___.._- 50•NER,IND BUFFER -TT- / l w.. `\ ..- \ N =pT�`• \ (' yc C.. �._..-�. .. J / / / l I l l I .-..-.. IPIPE..-.. -.. _. ......>Jrrr7nnnnl, ISTINc 6uILDING .' T.. f.. 1.1-• 1 I I l / / / / / / rT FOINND�7E/ �EE7)L / Ex CCCCK=000 STONE FENCE g sz2e' .�.. TAIsT-- \ \ \ \ \ l / 1 / I I l l 1 1 (I I I I s o0•u'oe' w T \t--\--- _�,- / / I I 1 I I - BUILDING SET BACK UNE 1 TSB 1� !X)I/ i,/ C - =�✓ I l \1 I\+l_♦-� i-�-fl ------ �1Qq 6371e 6oy8C6 -0. ARB�A 'N�FF � / 1l l \ / / I I / / I 1 / I l I I 1 1 ! / / / // l / //' s ee16'x EE _-_-_-_-_----_-_-_ /- = ¢7T PQ( r �- a / 1 \ \ CIHA iFbym _wATEB DISTRCT 1 F rl wpE uxhu F I I / I 1 I 1 1 I N I ! \ \ 1 (�0 ) S l '20 PC MIOE RICHT\OF WAV ....YM SIDE �NO. 45¢/ -\ \ \VOLUME'fiL PAGE 106 ly ME t gACE t87I \ ( 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \( \ \ 1 ( fl.. / DwEL ) >\\ y0L J/ �9 M�" P t 1 Y l 1 /�) l \ // I ; I I GRAPHIC SCALE \ MAP e0 PAGE 1Bp" �„ Aye 40 / I t 1 / IL.... 0ID. a B. NEE' y 1 � � �\ \\ \ I \ / // / J 1 I / / / / / / / 1 / I I I I I 1 /, / /ry w 20 FT woE A qW- z Y` % \ / _ \ 4 ,� y \ \\ \ `\ I PLANNED 100 FOOT WIDE RIGHT OF WAY o Ia / J9./Y y RUNE 871 PACE ]4 " N \ \ \ •'' 1 / / r / / / / / / 1 1 / / / / 188 OFF RAMP 1I t p A N 139.4 ' E (WI:yooLLRIGHIS 4 REL AT � PIS, \ \ J / COT � M1D >�HjT 3✓�I / I / / / 1 I I�I I I I ( I ( g L I (- ) + I ; .1� Y \ \ ORTON Q�'v o,B3-, P 1J81 ';l ° I�`Y \ \ \_�-\./13 EJs'� ( IN FEET' ) �--�-2ozee• //�J I r \ PORT W OF LDT B I w 1 lov r" 56213121 \!_ o / ee ' •. \ \ J �E14 EI - I 1 /\ 1 \ \ \ ! �AP �L'IDE I10. l"" / ! ( I fl / / / J / / /, / b�-/ /? CITY CLERK'S OFFlf I l�j l / / / y ` 1 (' \ \ \ \ 'l S0. BURLINGTON. W. . 2010 I I / / \\ \ \ \ 1 % \�\ 1 \ ( \ ( 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I /,ICl/ / / �'� \ I , LANDS of `�,�', \\ 1 \ \ Y / / I �{I , l / 4 jm I I PION OF V PROPERTIES, LLC. RECEIVED FOR RECORD AT O'CLOCK % FT. _ , I _ / \ ' k \ Y I ) / I 1 / I / / PORTION OF VOLUME 681, PAGE 736 ARY \ � D. D. a B. F\ NEFR / \ Cl(1' 011 SOU UIILINGfV,x/ / / ( 1 ( f (LOT 1) - M., AND RECORDED IN VOL OF 1�A/ Iw LL +\ 15 P(CD[[ N1DE SEVER EASEME� / J ` \ - d0 FOQr 1WPE PU�7BHU� gICjNT AF' y'A 1 / / / / J I I \ \�w(` Y'., I I MAP SLIDE N0. 445 MAPS ON PACE i'b" / % �. VIXLOME ]7, PAGE 34 VOL. 6D6, P 111 •SEND/V�L� 9!P jY27/ / A \ $m I PORTION OF PARCEL NO. 2 I / % �/ .P(M. W01._ 783, �• 1�i1 / I$\ "� ('NTH �t1G1T5 0! RELOOJ`ON)/ -/ J MAP SLIDE N6. 4✓f((1. e/M VOI,�aS % ,8,/ ,///� / IJ / / , / I / 1 S i MAP VOL. 187, PAGE 85 ATTEST _ $r 1,01 ACRE >f��K \ J AN MAP K)L. (97, P IB / / / / •Q•Iy / / ! 41 S. BURLINGTON. Vr. MUNICIPAL CLERK RLp(1�OF�C-AT. nip 460' -1 W ` Lyj I 1 I /:}W YAW eARN / i .A1iN-R to I � F ` i`�� _ - \ `. - J Y l 1 /( j I j I I - 9 ONE Lo \ \ } ( , / '� - \' / 'S0 FOOT FRONT k / �, I I I I I I I I I ' I I)ATEI CW&xED LO15 6 a 7 INTO T By, I \ � \ - /-- ARC _-_,_ / I I n I o I I 1 - 1' i m z1 0 AND RELATED REWSONS JPK -�20.IT'� ..�,%I l_t� \1 \ 1 \ \_\ / ,_ 7T/ t I TM�I -- I '-1 I .i I a ' s 04.33'31 w I \ ( I I \ 11 $ r - - �-/ - - -,_,\_ _ - _ _I / / I I I 1 I I I I / ) / M1E, REVISED TITLE BLOCK a BYI CX - te' \ \ v 1 1 - ..i\ `�- - -.rsl J (�- i 111 I I % ; .? I o9 0 m ADDED SEWER a WATER RIGHTS .PI( s �- _--TL-� Y-F aV-- PIZZAGALU PROPERTIES, LLC _=�"„�- - Bi7.e, / , / , f-/ F7 �� -/r/� -1 N B 7-.�i••-/'�"_'/-_1144-I-+-+-f-l�� OOY5'OB' W I / � ,^ l , 1 , / / I I--�-rT I L-1._ PO BOX ZOOS SOUTH BURLINGTON , VERMONT 05403-2009 FM ! / FM \ \ / •++c _uwRL t ( S J FMlapr I 5 6 QD.S'De' W SUBDIVISION PLAT MOUNTAIN VIEW OFFICE PARK WIDENED PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY -1'S'--�\_yL_�(_- 'gym tp.g1' TILLEY 3 SUBDIVISION II' VOLUME 699, PAGE 322 L S 00.450e' W TILLEY DRIVE AND OLD FARM ROAD s ib LANDS OF --- 21a58' _ 4N/ILIE(�4,A SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT PIZZAGALU PROPERTIES, U.C. ORIGINAL PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY I LANDS OF S!)16'S9` E---'--� DF / (FORMERLY PIZZAGALU INVESTMENT COMPANY) VOLUME 606. PACE 111 I` I PIZZA GAW PROPERTIES, LLC. ��` P �.� SMYeY BFD/MRM SCte 1' = 60' PORTION OF VOLUME 215. PAGE 111 I (FORMERLY PIZZAGALU INVESTMENT COMPANY) THIS SURVEYWASBASED W RECORD RESEARCH OF . 4` ` LOT A PORTION OF VOLUME 215. PAGE 111 I" - PERTINENT DEEDS. OTHER DFFKSAL RECORDS. AND - y MICHAEL •; Donald L. Hamlin .� APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF ( A. r R. �� JPK 07-510 MAP SLIDE N0. 404 (LOT BENOF)IfE REHb7aREb ON 771E PIROPEIRTY. THIS PUT MAP DE Ni).404 COMPUES WIIMpy WSA 1403 2 8 fi1N.. MRM Consulting R( SW TIR BURLINGTON, VERMONT ON THE -DAY OF T010 7 y _ x M 1' m SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SAID CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED dlr DATED THIS 'V�DAY OF- 20p8 ,• " •• .• MRM Engineers, Inc. nbin� h IS_ DAY OF . 2010 BY . CHAIRMAN OR CLERK. MICHAEL R. uklxK. LS PIT AAIA AOOOPYIHI�4444 llY � Of 7/07/08 Essex Junction• 1'Wrmont Friendly,individualized unless.onorbefore 4 lessonsin S.Burtingtom 802-864-7740. Tuesday.March 9, 2010, a party notifies the TROMBONE & PIANO District Commission of LESSONS anissue or issues requir- All levels. styles ing the presentation of welcome. Areas of evidence at a hearing or _ focus incl, technique, the commission sets the ear training/theory, matter for hearing on its phrasing/musicality, own motion. Any hearing improvisational vocabu- request shall be in writ - BANDS/ any. Andrew M,ro'. 802.999-4186,andrew. ing n to the address below, MUSICIANS mor-Ogmail.com, shall state the criteria or subcriteria at issue. STUDIO/ why a hearing is required FUNDRAISER SEEKS and what additional evi- BANDS! REHEARSAL dent, will be presented The Ile, Out Art Shout at the hearing. Any hear - seeks bands to play ing request by an adjoin. on Sunday, April 11. at MAKING A CO? MAKE IT Ing property owner or Halversoris. Preferably COUNT other interested person fun, danceable, lots of Hearwhat profession al must include a petition energy! Info, Alyssa, willardandmaple@ CD mastering can do for your band. Adrian for party status. Prior to champlain.edu. Carr, NYC mastering submitting a request for veteran, will help you a hearing, please contact 'Sound Your Best," the district coordina- INSTRUCTION Free samples: www. tar at the telephone acmaste9fO numberlisted belowfor ANOV'S MOUNTAIN B00.335-9103. more information. Prior to convening a hearing, AffoMUSIC accessible theDistrictCommis- Commis - instruction mand tin. In guitar mandolin. banjo, more. slon must determine All ages/skill levels/ that substantive issues interests! Supportive, requiring a hearing have professional teacher been raised. Findings of offering references, Fact and Conclusions of results, convenient Law will not be prepared scheduling.Andy unless the Commission Greene, 802.658-2462, guitboy75Ohotmail. ACT 250 NOTICE holtlsapublic hearing. com.www.andysmoun- MINORAPPLICATION - tainmusic.com. 10 V.S.A., SECTIONS Should a hearing be 6001-6092 held on this project and GUITAR INSTRUCTION you have a disabilityfor Berklee grad. w/ On February 9, 2010. Ve- which you are going to 3e0Years teaching rizon Wireless, SBA Tow- need accommotla[ion, Aerie offers lessons inguitar. ens II. LLC. and Randall H. please notify us by Tues. .ce music theory &air training. and Emily A. Clark filed day, March 9.2010. Individualised, step- application #4CII43-3 by -step approach. All for a project generally Parties entitled to ages/styles/levels. Info: described as participate are the Mu- rickbelfOmyfairpoint. nicipality, the Municipal net,802-864-7195. The addition ofa 20' Planning Commission, GUITAR LESSONS extension to an existing the Regional Planning All styles/levels. t10O tall communica- Commission, affected Lessons customized for Lion pole. the mounting state agencies, and ad. you to learn the songs, of six panel antennas joining property owners licks, styles of your and the installation of and other persons to the c choice. Dave Diamond (Grippo Funk Band, a prefabricated 12' x 15' extent they have a par- 5 Jennifer Hartswick equipment shelter. The ticularized interest that Band). 802-734-2032. Project is located at 23 may be affected by the e Browns Trace Road in proposed project under i GUITAR SCHOOL OF the Town ofJerich.. VT. thel0 criteria. Non -patty VERMONT participants may also be ,W Not yourusualmust The District 4 Environ- allowed under lO V.S.A. Instruction.' Attention mental Commission will Section 6085(c)(5). from multiple teachers, review this application fundamentals, theory, technique, under Act 250 Rule 51 Dated at Essex Junction, composition. c Teaching Guitarist's - Minor Applications. Vermont this llth day of in Growing Musicians. Info: Copies of the application February. 2010. d 802-655-5800'www. and proposed permit a guitarschoolofvermont. are available for review By /s/ Stephanie H. ^! com. at the Jericho Town Of- Monaghan o Rte, Chittenden County Stephanie H. Monaghan GUITAR INSTRUCTION Regional Planning Natural Resources Board All styles/levels. Emphasis on developing Commission located at Distinct #4 Coordinator t strong technique, 110 West Canal Street, 111 West Street c thorough musicianship, Suite 202. Winooski, and Essex Junction, VT z personal style. Paul the office listed below. OS452 Asbell(Unknown Blues The application and pro. T/802-879-5662 vi Band, Kilimanjaro, posed permit may also E/stephanie.mon- UVM&M!ddlebury be viewed on the Natural aghanOstat-Lus College faculty),Info: Resources BoarCs web paulas ell.co , www. site (www.nrb.state. BURLINGTON DEVELOP - by vt.us/IupJ by click ing MENT REVIEW BOARD o MUSICLESSONS on "Act 250 Database' Tuesday March 16,2010 LL Piano. guitar, bass. voice, and entering the case PUBLIC HEARING M theory, composition, number above. NOTICE songwriting. All ages, u levels, styles. 2S yrs. exp. No hearing will be held The Burlington Develop- ment Review Board will subdividing a 6.3 acre lot hold a public hearing on developed with a place Tuesday March 16, 2010 ofworship into two (2) at 5:00 p.m. in Contois lots of 4.27 acres (lot Auditorium. City Hall to #1) and 2.03 acres (lot consider the following #2) and 2) developing applications: the 2.03 acre lot with 18 dwelling units consisting 1. 10-0622CU: 88 North of three (3) two-family Prospect Street(RL, dwellings and four(4)3 Ward 1) Eric & Rachel unit multi -family dwell. Jacobs ings, 899 Dorset Street Change use of'extension' into separate unit fora 2. Final plat application total of three units on '#SO-10-04 of Pi'zagalIi the property. Properties. LLC to amen a previously approved 2.10-0600CA/MA: 175 three (3J lot su"' Lakeside Ave (ELM, Wa sion. The amendment 5) REM Development consists ofcombining Company, LLC lots #6 and into one (1) Remove two buiWings lot totaling 13.53 acres, and construct one new 47 Til ley Drive. building with expanded parking area. Change 3. Final plat application ofuse to office/educa- #5610-050fl-I.-teal bonal. Design, Inc to amen Plans may be viewed in the Planning and Zoning office, (City Hall, 149 Church Street, Burlington), between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. This may not be the final order in which Items will be heard at the meeting. Please view the final Agenda, at www. ci.burlington.vt.us/plan- ning/drb or posted on the Planning and Zoning Office notice board. one week before the hearing for the specific order in which items will be heard. CITY OF BURLINGTON Voter registration dead- line date: Wed., 2/24, 5 p.m., clerk/tmasurers office. Clerk/treasurers once open Sat., 2127, 9 a.m. - 12 p.m., voting purposes only. Clerk/treasurers office open Mon., 3/1, 8 a.m. - 7:30 p.m. (4:30 and on voting purposes only) PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing in the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday. March 16, 2010 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Final plat application #SO-10-03 of Home- stead Design, Inc. for a planned unit develop- ment consisting of; a previously approved planned unit develop- ment consisting of 89 res- idential units in 16 build- ings. The amendment consists ofconstructing a public street access from Songbird Road to a proposed residential development (Alder Hill), Songbird Road. John Dlnklage. Chairman South Burlington Devel- opment Review Board Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. February 24, 2010 REQUEST FOR PROPOS- ALS Town of Williston Old Stage Road Con- crete Sidewalk Project WILLISTON, STP SD WK(004) - Old Stage Road Concrete Sidewalk The Town of Williston is requesting Statements of Qualifications (S00) s from engineering Firms (Consultants) for engineering services for the Design of the Old Stage Road Concrete Sidewalk in the Town of Williston. The project encompasses the design of 1,600 linear feet of 5 foot wide concrete Sidewalk adjacent to Old Stage Road, beginning at Wildflower Circle and ending at Mountain View Drive. The Town is seeking a Consultant with expertise In designing, engineering and permit- ting such a project as outlined in the 2002 VTrans Pedestrian and Bicycle Facility Planning and Design Manual. The procurement Process for selection of the Consultantwill be a Qualifications Based Selection (OBS). We are not seeking a cost pro- posal at this time. The successful Consultant will be selected based upon their demonstrated ability to provide the highest qualified team to achieve the goals of the project through their SOO and possible inte, view with the selection committee. Please contact Lisa Murdock O 802-878. 1239 or MURDOCKLOW il- listontowttcom with any questions and to obtain a detailed RFD. Propos- als should be sent to Town of Williston, 7900 Williston Roatl, Williston, Vermont 05495 and are due by 2:00 p.m. March 12, 2010. STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT DOCKET NO.50663-09 CnC Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee RALI 20060514 Plaintiff Samuel J. Dimascola. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as nominee for Home. comings Financial Net- work. Inc. And Occupants residing at 3064-3066 T. Roosevelt Highway. Bolton, Vermont . Defendants NOTICE OF SALE By virtue and m execu. tion of the Power of Sale contained In a certain mortgage given by Homecomings Financial Network, Inc. to Samuel J. Dimascola dated Sep- tember 13, 2006 and recorded in Volume 72, Page 301 of the Land Records of the Town of Bolton, of which mort- gage the undersigned is the present holder, for breach of the condi- tions of said mortgage and for the purposes of foreclosing the same will be sold at Public Auction at 11:15 A.M. on March 23. 2010. at 3064-3066 T. Roosevelt Highway, Bolton, Vermont all and singular the premises ascribed in said mort- gage: To Wit: Being all and the same land and premises conveyed to Samuel J. Dimascola by War. ranty Deed of Lee Heil and Pamela Heil dated November 23, 2004 and recorded November 30, 2004 in Volume 66, Page 187 of the Town of Bolton Land Records. Terms of Sale: $10.000.00 to be paid in cash by purchaser at the time of sale, with the balance due at closing. Proof of financing for the balance of the purchase to be provided at the time of sale. The sale is subject to taxes due and owing to the Town of Bolton. The mortgagor is entitled ro redeem the premises at any time prior to the sale by pay- ing the full amount due under the mortgage. including the costs and expenses of the sale. Other terms to be an- nounced at the sale or inquire at Lobe & Fortin, 30 Kimball Ave., Ste. 306. South Burlington, VT 05403, 802 660- 9000. DATED at South Burling- ton, Vermont this 19th day of February, 2010. Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee RALI 20060S14 By: Joshua B. Lobe, Esq. Lobe & Fortin, PLC 30 Kimball Ave., Ste. 306 South Burlington, VT 05403 mortgage given by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. t0 Jen. niter Smith dated May 2, 2007 and recorded in Volume 31. Page 270 of the Land Records of the Town of St. George. of which mortgage the undersigned is the pres- ent holder, for breach of the conditions of said mortgage and for the purposes of foreclosing the same will be sold at Public Auction at 9:30 A.M. on March 24, 2010, at 7000 Hinesburg Road a/k/a 7016 Vermont Route 116. St. George, Vermont all and singular the premises described in said mortgage: To Wit: Being all and the same lands and premises conveyed to Jennifer Smith by Warranty Deed of API Properties, LLC dated July 6, 2006 and recorded on July 8. 2006 in Volume 30 at Page 380 of the Town of SC George Land Recortls. Terms of Sale: $10,000,00 to be paid in cash by purchaser at the time of sale, with the balance due at closing. Proof of financing for the balance of the purchase to be provided at the time Of sale. The sale is subject to taxes due and owing to the Town of St. George. The mortgagor is entitled to redeem the premises at any time prior to the sale by pay- ing the full amount due under the mortgage, including the costs and expenses of the sale. Other terms to be an - STATE OF VERMONT nounced at the sale or CHITTENDEN COUNTY, inquire at Lobe & Fortin, SS. 30 Kimball Ave.. Ste. CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR 306, South Burlington. COURT VT05403,802660- DOCKET NO. S499-09 9000. Cnc DATED at South Burling- HSBCBank. USA. ton, Vermontthis 18th National Association, day of February. 2010. as Trustee for Wells Fargo Asset -Securities HSBC Bank, USA, Na- Corporation, Mortgage tional Association, Pass -Through as Trustee Certificates, Series 2007-10, By: Joshua B. Lobe, Esq. Plaintiff Lobe & Fortin, PLC V. 30 Kimball Ave., SM. 306 Jennifer Smith And Oc- South Burlington, VT cupants residing at 7000 05403 Hinesburg Road a/k/a 7016 Vermont STATE OF VERMONT Route 116, St. George, CHITTENDEN COUNTY, Vermont, SS. Defendants CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT NOTICE OF SALE DOCKET NO. S0617.09 Cri By virtue and in execu- tion ofthe Power ofSale Naoonstrir Mortgage, contained in a certain LLCf/k/a Centex Home rr �outhburlin ton PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SD - APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW ❑ Preliminary A Final PUD Being Requested? X Yes ❑ No All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, 50 Joy Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel # 660-6805 ; Fax # 660-6868 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 783, Pages 151-153 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 50 Joy Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel # 660-6805 ; Fax # 660-6868 4. CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Robert Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, 50 Joy Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel # 660-6805 ; Fax # 660-6868 a. Contact email address: Bbouchard@pizzagalliproperties.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 47 Tilley Drive 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1718-00047 Subdivison Plat Application 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): To subdivide one parcel of 14.54 acres into two lots. Lot 6/7 is 13.53 acres. Lot 8 is 1.01 acres. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): None c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): N/A. Applicant is proposing subdivision only. The commercial development of each Tot will be reviewed under a site plan application. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): No buildings currently exist on site. Applicant seeks subdivision only. e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): N/A. Applicant seeks subdivision only. f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): N/A g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): N/A h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Property is situated in the Industrial and Open Space District. i. List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. Applicant wishes to combine two lots (lots 6 & 7) into one large lot of 13.53 acres. Lot 8 totalinq 1.01 acres remains unchanaed. 2 Subdivison Plat Application 9. LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a. Size of Parcel: 14.54 / 633,362 (acres /sq. ft.) b. Building Coverage: N/A. Applicant seeks subdivision only. Existing square feet % Proposed square feet c. Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): N/A Existing square feet % Proposed square feet % d. Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): N/A Existing square feet % Proposed square feet % 9. WETLAND INFORMATION a. Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? X Yes ❑ No b. If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands associated 50' buffers (describe) Subdivision Plat shows delineation of Class III wetlands and 50' buffer. c. If yes, please submit the following with this application.- 1. A site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's wetland map. A delineation and wetlands study previously submitted to City. 2. Response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria) 10. AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: N/A SQ. FT. * *Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 3 11, COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ N/A b. Landscaping: $ Please submit itemized list of landscaping proposed) c. Other site improvements (please list with cost) 12. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 13. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 14. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 15. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: N/A Subdivison Plat Application 16. PLEASE LIST ABUTTING LANDOWNERS, INCLUDING THOSE ACROSS THE STREET. You may attach on a separate sheet. West - Ms. Barbara Neff, 700 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 Northwest - Mr. Brian Armstrong, 50 Old Farm Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 North - Mr. Doug Dickey, 80 Old Farm Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 North - Mr. Dan O'Brien, 150 Old Farm Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 4 Subdivison Plat Application 17. PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application (see Exhibit A). Enclosed I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT 104,v�_ ��� iy SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Robert Bouchard PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: V6 Pe" I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: Complete Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee 5 PLANNING & ZONING February 25, 2010 Pizzagalli Properties, LLC Attn: Robert Bouchard 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 47 Tillev Drive Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public hearing notice that will be printed in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." - If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com vi~ PLANNING & ZONING February 25, 2010 Ms. Barbara Neff 700 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 47 Tilley Drive Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice that will be published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern � related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public hearing. Sincerely, JannBeagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street SoUth Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846,4101 www.sburl.com c 111 CY ULLAAU, 3� A._. i.,, o ,. �u PLANNING & ZONING February 25, 2010 Mr. Brian Armstrong 50 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 47 Tilley Drive Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice that will be published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public hearing. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846,4101 www.sburl.corn eApp, MEN PLANNING & ZONING February 25, 2010 Mr. Doug Dickey 80 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 47 Tilley Drive Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice that will be published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to t1 le subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public hearing. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802,846.4106 fax 802,846.4101 www.sburl.com PLANNING & ZONING February 25, 2010 Mr. Dan O'Brien 150 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 47 Tilley Drive Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice that will be published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public hearing. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7'LLTY DRIVE � , DI- - -` --�I_--_-_-- ` / - ----^ / �------ ° /L�— / / / / / / � | - TT;) ^ P.O. BOX 2009 PROJECTIULE MOUNTAIN VIEW OFF1 I%W 'I"iwnmldL Jlamlin Ingineers, Inc. _ _ LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OF I S OF't .. _ - ..r n .v( .r-rv'� O'BRIEN FAMILYAL.,.. PARTNER P ` ''"•-rvr J DANIEL J. & SPNDRA T. O'BRIEN VOLUME 420, PAGE 345 '� NOTES �` �� \\ VOLUME 74.PAGE 419 InQT j} r.h i(i J.,�rr+r- MAP VOLUME A30, PAGE 75 t,279r8zE� 't\V-J7 -SLIDE 1. SEE PLAN ENTITLED "PLAN SHOWING PROPOSED BOUNDARY LINE REVISIONS ROY, WRIGHT & TILLEY FARM OLD FARM ROAD 50. BURLINGTON, VERMONT" PREPARED BY WARREN A. /� FOIIND 1/2• STEEL PIPE, / 2.53' \ (UP 0.3' N e4i0'28" E SEE NOTE)f / \ / \ I MAP RO. 425 DISTRICPr.,\ &MAP SLIDE NO 425 '..MAP _ �NggRC(AL _ N g}'1039 • „/.. ` - ,wv> TRIAL s (/C) r, ~+ >>, 253 FOUNDr ALUMINUM PLAGME.. MfXCD FNOUS�,I�CT' B I . DISTRf ROBENSTIEN. L.S. DATED JUNE 1983. LAST REVISED FEBRUARY 1987. AND FILED IN MAP VOLUME 252. PACE 66 OF THE SOUTH BURUNCTON LAND RECORDS 119.7ti 1 - - , N 84'20 T6' E' -+'V-Y`�.'F+'NOIE'''3)' 22 6, ..` `.., . - �,.,.F/....1-. of 10 g SP f E�0)/IN1A�dr'TA�-'I l I r ,r• FOUND I/2" S7EEL PIPE I I ' UP D 3/4' STEEL PIPE 2. SEE PLAN ENTITLED "PIZZAGAW PROPERTIES, LLC P. 0. BOX 2009 SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05403-2009 BOUNDARY PLAT SHOWING SUBDIVISION OF LANDS OF PIZZAGAW \ / /'+\ ,�/rr2.07 1l� }1� ) 1>%/ r , ) ,( I f r I , I /� _� _ / f' + r i '�J / / /t ICI 5[E NOTE)1 (UP 0.85').,-\> I� ;' SFE NOTE - , PROPERTIES. LLC HINESBURC ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERNONY PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, \ 'oA / AR.p}- -/r•� 'I'� '�'' / / 7- �HDE Y /�fQK 1\ ) / 3`� FqO, / ' I INC. DATED JANUARY 21, 2002, REVISED FEBRUARY 8, 2002, AND TILED IN MAP SLIDE NO. 404 OF THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. \ /.r ( . Imo- / // ( / / lll� ) l J. SEE PLAN ENTITLED 'SUBDIVISION PLAN DANIEL J. O'BRIEN & LEO O'BRIEN JR. O'BRIEN HOME FARM KIMBALL AVENUE AND OLD FARM ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT" \\ / FOUND 3/.- TEEL PIN I / -L-�� SEE NOTE 1 r "lr el ( SEE / ARYDETAIL IJ I DIME NCE)M AN,DEI(S / - ml I I I II) 1 / / / /ALO)IC PROPERTY fT r 1 I 1 I r / ,i' k _ PREPARED BY KREBS & LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. DATED NOVEMBER 1& 1996. LAST REVISED JULY 29. 2003, AND FILED IN MAP SLIDE NO. 425 OF THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS J BOUNDARY DETAIL NOTscPOOL xor AlE I 4. SEE RECORD OF SURVEY ENTITLED "PLAN SHOWING PROPOSED SUB -DIVISION OF TILLEY FARM OLD FARM RD, SO. BURLINGTON. VT.' PREPARED BY WARREN A. ROBENSTIEN. L. S., DOULANDS DICKEY r [) \ \ ( 1 I \ ( \ I I I I I ( I DATED ,NNE 1983, REVISED THROUGH MARCH 1985. AND RECORDED IN MAP VOLUME 197, PAGE 65 OF THE SOUTH VOLUME 667, PACE 579 DM:L \ \ \ 1 \ I I I I I BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS 5. SEE HIGHWAY PLANS ENTITLED "STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS INTERSTATE PROJECT IN THE TOWN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON RELOCATION HINESBURG ROAD" PROJECT NO. ROY PARCELS" MAP VOLUME 252, PAGE 86 1 I Y} Y\ 1 I I I I I I I I 1! I I I \ 1 1 1W I I ) 1-89-3(14) PREPARED BY VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, SHEETS 22 AND 23. 6. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS WAS OBTAINED FROM A FIELD TRAVERSE TO NOS STATIONS PC1965 WOOD RA.] FENCE ^ .. V .' .� •\ J 1 \ I \ \ I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I / / I I 9 1 I \ ' AND A89665 AND IS REFERENCED TO VERMONT STATE PLANE COORDINATES - NADB3. (ARTICLES 7. THE SUBJECT LANDS ARE LOCATED M THE INDUSTRIAL -OPEN SPACE ZONING DISTRICT. SEE 3. 5.04. AND APPENDIX C-2 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLNGTON LAND DEVELOPMENT ADOPTED MAY 12. T003 WITH EOFDURUSSELL ENTS il_ .o--^��1I 1. yoy:- r- 24Y.74 , \ \ I OPEN SPICE , A" 83'9(t0 \11 \I I I I 1II I I Ie. II SE EPLAN ENTITLED SUBOIVISIUJLATIONS RCTIVE TIEYPREPARED BY DU77TN PLAT ESTATE lNWsr'uAL 1 I I I I I I I IrII I I I 1 I I 1 PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS P.C. DATED APRIL 1. 2004 AND FILED INMAP SLIDE NO. 450 OF THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS / L - \ / t •, \ ` I \ 1 1 I I I 1 ) / I I I I \ <I ( ; I I I I I I I / 9. THE SUBJECT LANDS MAY BE SUBJECT TO SEWAGE OVERFLOW RIGHTS FIRST GRANTED BY ROWN -• 1 1 / _, /` 1 I -1 % I OL51R1QT I 1 I 1() I I I \ ) I I IDATED L. AND HELEN Y. TILLEY IN -HEIR WARRANTY DEED TO HIRAM F. AND FANNIE R. TILLEY, UTH/ BURLINGTON LLAND RECORDS. PREVIOUS 3. 1962 AND AOWNERS 1OF THE LANDS 962 IN ENOW OF ARMSTRONG & 61. PAGE 156 OF THE gLL50N. IOU -- $/y8 / AL I ! I/YII I I 1 I !I`j MOMED-PATHCE.gICD/?$ /I/; sAIL- F.gNCE. ,L�4caoACH / FOUND 3/B• STEEL PIN :? ;' y� �\- , (SEE NOTE 1) \ \ \ L0T171 I I I 1 I I I '-` \'•\ �6oRn /OF \�qi 1704 0. 11y11 LANDS OF 7.80,hCkF)S) III ,0 B. T. ARMSTLANG & L. J. 1, SONS • / • %FFDUND�3/8"+STEEL PIN \ -__- / I I VOLUME 462, PAGE 316 / _ - - NOTE T) \ \ ` _ ._ - /PORTION OF y.OJf 1 oe' MAP VOLUME 252 PAGE 86 g _ \( \ �\ \ �'- -\ /MAP 'SLID NOI'- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 49.97' PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY S '� - \ I \ \ \ �w�,•-T r I / / ( 1 / 7 }' HIGHWAY RECORDS VOLUME 1, PAGE 1 8336'O6" W / •- - \ '/ /' / l I J / / /l / I ! % ! \\\ l„III,,,, WOOD RNLVE\ M MOWED PAT16 EMTN r \ / DWEL �FILL. & \•`.DItA\VW\PIPE ENCR(JAtR\�. \ \ [FOUND 3/e' STEEL PIN/ / %J SEE NOTE , 21 L�B:76 \ POb \ \ r �I+.Dm636w1av°F�y°%i.- \ ` Ll i ( SPAC \ I. \ _\ \ \ T ( \ ---t-.L�'F _-ARd '!1 ROW OF -CONIFER �' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ U / / f-f-, T_, 7"'-% r-7- "7 \ 1' \ TREES ENCROACH-' r \ FOUND\3/8` STEEL PI14\ \ '-/// .(SEE NOTE I) \ -�_ t I>1 \ WA117ANE sLW , \BITUMINOUS.,\ LANOs a : mt ) /I ' -t w�iElLec .gs$l'�1+WaN9 : S 8T 2 17EE�, F -'1" _ _ ,ISNo�er�lsLtyMwEgpr oX RLeolyd6) 1 4 �I 1 : LuoS OF, PKa� / r r� 25' `\ ROADWAYS L \ 1./. \I FaL PRE 1� fW W�wR Rid11T/ 057o`�'I/' IMO G6ELIEN ` REca1t9) ,1 '�N I ( I Y �N_ I 14 I/ a U APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT ON THE _DAY OF . 2008 SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SAID CONDITIONS OF SND RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS _ DAY OF , 20DS BY , CHAIRMAN OR CLERK. r -\Tr -��J.el ��•�- {�'�.�a�.,I / /.' rrL!�(l j ..L=/ i/ I -I '`,� I / / �/ L/ '/-1/7-/ 1 --/ -ocwl ,4..7./.7}! \ I I / I R \\ _ / / � t ---------YYYYYY � L \ '� \ / I 1 1 I 1 ,ice � / - -T1�- I�T-- �� '\ / , , / ! 1 / ( I I 1 I I ) I I V, ` i� 8 / r -,--�✓ -� BLS I I Y-7-F� /�-1_F 1 \ \ \ \ , >\. d +I / I Ili- r• f - J _.._ Y ,6&01.15D ARBARA (:'N1=FFJ�11 -VOW/07T AP�Gfhj/1'`- -1 __�J I• 1 !` CNAM 1MATER DISTRICT / GR NCUN'TAIN'PoWER/Cy.P. I MAP SLIDE O. 4 / / - - --- l \ '20 FOOT WIDE RTCHTOF WAY ) \i TI WIDE UTILITY USE ENf ( \ 1 1 I I \I ( 1 � _ jl .5 \ � \ \VOUJMyIE'102,�PAGE 106 131; fJAGE 1871 80/ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 1•' MAP VOL PACE -/ ! �,,kX uue 4e: PAU 405 IBD rl"-' l / / / / / , / ! I 1 J l J l) J / /)•r D.\D.&B.. -EFFjqT1 ( 20 FT: WDE A SS o,W. i 1 / 39, 48' VOLUME 671 PACE la _ Gi /(\y Z 1 \ ti \ / / -' -RAVEL %N 113T16- E (W)N a1GNT5nod)0�Q'aN1E 7ORTIGN+ YOL 723; Pam._- \-/ I' T-17C3 CR ml /(!OJ r� sazTl'21 1 -!, ,o IiIJ t�l. \ \ / F B / // ///�-/-T., 1• r AP SLIDE FAO. k '' e ( ` , / / / = sa rr. \ ea'\I 1\ 1\ \�_ `` \ 4-' \ ` \ \ I , r )/ / / I ! I91/ If S.�b15irN0AR1' \ ) \ �" e - \ D. D. & B. A NEFF J \ CIIFY OA SOU��1111 UIILINC / 1 7�//W- / LOT 8 - ISEie�gX 15 FObLWDE SEWER EASEMENT /- �' 80 FOOT WIDE PUBUL� RIGHT OF) WAY E u _PGR. OF VOL 783, P. T 1 \ 1 ... I VOLUME �71. PAGE 34 VOL. 6GB, P/ 111 AND/ G99;'P,' j2v / / J / 1\S` ` (WTH ON ai RELaATDN)� MAP SLIDE !1H). 450, M 21 P, 05,/ aCx $L P� aFyLOf.T10 ACRE AN � J� \ r �t�� i � � �� _ / AND MAP� �L J9�' r / i i � i i / BARN F'i ON%YARD \ �I x• lo�, _ _ to _� :.kl I �� 1 z �_.. Aso r FRONT/YARD 6 04.33' w./20.01' �" S L-4.1 - -1-r j S J i i.�- +\) \� T� W -�T-- 581.61'/ /� /L! _(_4'-rT_�r1Jam_,-I FMFM M S FM I -FIR - - -1-- _ .__ _ 1 - • r S S WIDENED PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY VOLUME 699. PAGE 322 LANDS OF PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES. LLC. ORIOINAL PUBLC RIGHT OF WAY I LANDS OF (FORMERLY PIZZAGALLI INVESTMENT COMPANY) VOLUME 606. PAGE III I I PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES. LLC. PORTION OF VOLUME 215. PAGE 111 (FORMERLY PIZZAGALLI INVESTMENT COMPANY) MAP SUDS A) 404 I PORTION OF VOLUME 215. PAGE 111 (LOT B) MAP SLIDE NO. 404 I 3 - P 8 i LANDS OF PIZZAGALU PROPERTIES, LLC. PORTION OF VOLUME 681, PAGE 736 } (LOT 2) MAP SLIDE N0. 445 PORTION OF PARCEL NO. 2 MAP VOL. 197, PAGE 65 i r RECEIVED SEP 1 1 K'. / t•., 1 �,, .,}• C".7 � �SIwTN e ..-.... i S4rr:ry Ssix 5 T N VNlLIBTON/4... BURU,NO ` _._ ... I j\ VICINITY MAP NTS LEGEND EI FOUND VADT 4' BY 4' CONCRETE MONUMENT PROPOSED 4' BY 4' CONCRETE MONUMENT PROPOSED 3/4' STEEL PIPE Q FOUND STEEL PM (DIAMETER AND ORIGIN AS NOTED) Q FOUND STEEL PIPE ONSIDE DIAMETER AND ORIGIN AS NOTED) POINT NOT MRMIENTED --�- - UTILITY POLE VITH DVERHEAD UTILITY LINES APPROXIMATE EDGE OF WOODED AREA -- LAND BOUNDARY UNE --- EASEMENT LINE -- W - APROX WATER MAIN -S- APPROX. SANITARY SEWER LINE / City of $O. Burlington -FM- APPROX. SANITARY FORCEMAIN WOOD RAIL FENCE EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR LINE - - F - - ZONING DISTRICT LINE TNT CLASS 3 WETLANDS ' - 50' WETLAND BUFFER /FOUND 3/4" STEEL PIPE ® EXISTING BUILDING (SEE NOTE 1), 52.287 CICK OC CLb STONE FENCE - S 00'45'08- W , - - - - - - BUILDING SET BACK LINE 819,5' GRAPHIC SCALE PLANNED 100 FOOT WIDE RI_T OF WAY (1-89 OFF RAMP) s Ir/ I LANDS OF \, PIZZAGALU PROPERTIES, LLC. PORTION OF VOLUME 681. PAGE 736 I (LOT 1) i I MAP SLIDE N0. 445 PORTION OF PARCEL NO. 2 MAP VOL 197. PAGE 65 W I i I 10.01' I i 00'43'06IL W I 10.01' S 00'45'08' w I �s 010.01. " w 218.58, S 87'16'5v E -- - -a THIS SURVEY WAS BASED ONREODRD RESEARCH OF PERTINENT D®S• OTHER OFFICIAL RECORDS. AND EVIDENCE RECOVERED (IN THE PROPERTY. THIS PLAT COMPLIES WITH V.S.A. 1403 (BX2)-T- DATED M DAY OF �, 2DOB 111-11 T VT. LS f811 CHAEL R. MA 4444OF 4111111III yP' MICHAE.1'. Sri R. n, MAGOON ' 1 No. 611:;' , LAND .� 1j1111IIL.444 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SO. BURLINGTON, VT. , 2008 RECEIVED FOR RECORD AT O'CLOCK M., AND RECORDED IN VOL. OF MAPS ON PAGE ATTEST S. BURLINGTON. VT. MUNICIPAL CLERK IDAIE: IREVMM REVISED TIna BLOCK & IBTI 1 PIZZAGAW PROPERTIES, LLC PO BOX 2009 SOUTH BURLINGTON , VERMONT 05403-2009 SUBDIVISION PLAT MOUNTAIN VIEW OFFICE PARK TILLEY 3 SUBDIVISION TILLEY DRIVE AND OLD FARM ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT BFD/MRM kale,^ m 5p' JPK Donald L. Hamlin Job 07_510 MRM Consulting RL 1 MRM Engineers, Inc. Dr..Iv 7/07/08 Essex Junction. Va t 1 Of 1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOAR,., OCTOBER 7, 2008 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 7 October 2008, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: J. Dinklage, Chair; E. Knudsen, M. Behr, G. Quimby, R. Farley, M. Birmingham Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; C. LaRose, Associate Planner; B. Bouchard, B. Armstrong, L. Wilson, S. McIntyre, N. Seidel, T. Dawson, S. & C. Savage, J. Zaetz, D. Young, T. Boyle, R. Veve, E. Farrell, A. Fritz. 1. Other Business/Announcements: Mr. Belair gave members a list of site plans for which he had granted administrative approval. 2. Minutes of 2 September 2008 and 16 September 2008: Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 2 September 2008 as written. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed 4-0 with Messrs. Knudsen and Birmingham abstaining. Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 16 September 2008 as written. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed 5-0 with Mr. Birmingham abstaining. 3. 11 -Final Plat Application #SD-08-48 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, for a planned unit development to subdivide a 14.54 acre parcel into three lots of 5.75 acres (lot #6), 7.8 acres (lot #7), and 1.01 acres (lot #8), 47 Tilley Drive: Mr. Bouchard said there have been no changes since preliminary plat. Mr. Bouchard expressed concern with the wording of Stipulation 43 of the approval motion. He said the discussion had been that if the interchange got put in, the access question would be revisited. Ms. LaRose said the wording is taken directly from the Preliminary Plat approval decision. Mr. Bouchard said he didn't know that there would be a problem, and they would like it left open to be revisited. Mr. Dinklage said that it is anticipated that there would be a substantial blockage of the access if the interchange is built. If it turns out there are no problems, the plan could be amended. Mr. Dinklage added that it is also a question of people turning into this property and being blocked from doing so. Mr. Knudsen suggested accepting this wording and looking at a revision when there is an actual developer of the property. -1- 1DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOAk.u' OCTOBER 7, 2008 After discussion, the following language was added to Stipulation #3: The applicant may wish to revisit this stipulation at the time that Exit 12B is constructed. Mr. Armstrong asked for confirmation that no curb cuts on Tilley Dr. are being approved at this time. Mr. Dinklage said that is true. Ms. Wilson asked if the focus would be on access points to the east and not nearer the residential homes to the west. Mr. Bouchard said Lot #6 is probably the one that would be developed first, and those are the curb cuts that they would come in for. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-08-48 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Continued Final Plat Application #SD-08-34 of Dorset Street Associates, LLC, and G&A Associates, LLC, to amend a planned unit development consisting of 149 residential units. The amendment consists of. 1) adding 30 acres to the project area, 2) constructing 79 single family dwellings, and 3) constructing 30 multi -family dwelling units, 1530 Dorset Street (Chittenden Cider Mill): Mr. Belair advised that the applicant had asked for a continuance until 21 October. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Final Plat Application #SD-08-34 of Dorset Street Associates, LLC, and G&A Associates, LLC, until 21 October 2008. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Design Review Application #DR-08-10 of Vermont Indoor Golf, Inc., seeking to obtain a new master signage permit for the property in the Dorset Street/City Center Sign District. The master signage permit would establish the design scheme for the freestanding and wall signs on the property, 35 San Remo Drive: Ms. LaRose noted that she had talked to the owners about the UNICEL sign on the property. Mr. Dawson said it will be gone by the end of the week. Ms. Seidel confirmed that the posts for the sign will be painted. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Design Review Application #DR-08-10 of Vermont Indoor Golf, Inc., subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. -2- 1 ii souAi x F' nglon PLA1YN[1Ya & Z0r4l,NG October 22, 2008 Bob Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Minutes — #SD-08-48 Dear Mr. Bouchard: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved October 7, 2008 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, 'L Gj t� Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 57S Dorset Street South 'Eurtzngtom, VT 05403 lei 882_946,4V 16 fax 80,12-849A101 oa WW. burl.nam October 10, 2008 Doug Dickey 80 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Final Plat Application #SD-08-48, 47 Tilley Drive Dear Mr. Dickey: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant 5?5 Dursat stra-It 5-auth lar[»ng on, VT 05403 2a1 902,946.4t'OG f&x f3i1`2.54�.4<►�! Fr�ava.stsn. .r_�€ soud"ibut'll, F1Ly- v October 10, 2008 Brian Armstrong Lora Wilson 50 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Final Plat Application #SD-08-48, 47 Tilley Drive Dear Mr. Armstrong & Ms. Wilson: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant 675 Dnrs&t Street A)Uth Burlington, MT 05403 lei 202- 466 4,108 fax CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Bo certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. there must be an o and (DRB) has Opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested tpersany on status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.q. DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation who has sought interested person status. 24 addr § 4461(b). The rendered by the DRB must be mailed to eve p . n of each person § 4461(y p copy of any decision been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. �' Person or body appearing the environmental court, the DRB n§ 446ust u(b I(3). Upon receipt of notice of an having appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. supply a list of interested persons to the to § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: NAME MAILING ADDRESS Vt-©1'4 Sc-vn rn f Jost . 0) ake- seer; t1-10,.V, ------------- &K PROJECT OF INTEREST M r' Sc - 4p(icli f ldj MS -dt-10 gx12 bff� S6t�S Verl- lak4 ZccLcso, titan -tom- �� �l S`6 ° �l ��w L s-- � 5G G L��A NOW � 1 r II r_464,0, southburlinton PLANNING & ZONING October 10, 2008 Bob Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Final Plat Application #SD-08-48, Tilley Drive Subdivision Dear Mr. Bouchard: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on October 7, 2008 (effective 10/10/08). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the land records within 180 days (must be recorded by 4/8/09) of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7008 0150 0003 6150 6185 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com ). Non-party participants io be allowed under 10 i 6085(c)(5). n Essex Junction, Vermont, th day of September, 2008' Peter E. Keibel Keibel Resources Board #4 Coordinator it Street Inction, VT 05452 379-5658, ,.keibel@state.vt.us GTON DEVELOPMENT BOARD searing Notice — October ington Development 3oard will hold a public on Tuesday, October 7, 5:00 P.M. in Contois um, City Hall to consider wing applications: 'U; 12 Ferguson Ave: A 5) Katherine Merritt/ kel ial use review to establish •ame building home oc- U; 27 Sears Ln: (ELM, Martin Fitzpatrick 'Two Go Dry Cleaning ial use review to establish p-off and pick-up compo- xisting dry cleaning plant 4; 6 Isham St: (RM,' evi & Ray Allaire and "owers zoning permit denial to iyt replacement windows : structure l; 155 Plattsburg Ave: 1 7) Paul Preseauit y plat review of 9-unit nit development be viewed in the Plan- 'oning office, (City Halt, 149 Church Street, i), between the hours of and 4:30 p.m. :e, AICP, Director of nd Zoning : who require special its to participate are I to contact the Depart- Ist 72 hours in advance. Ition call865-7188 TTY). 7:30 PM Final Plat Hearing ff l boundary adjustment of two t. / of 176 acres owned by Nancy C. Hinsdale at Spear Street and Bingham Brook Road. Application material can be viewed at the Planning and Zoning Office. Participation in the hearing is a prerequisite to the right to appeal any decision related to these applications. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO AMEND THE CHAROTTE LAND USE REGULATIONS The Charlotte Selectboard will hold a public hearing at the Charlotte Town Hall on Thursday, October 2, 2008 at 5:00 PM for the purpose of receiving public comment on a proposed amendment to the Charlotte Land Use Regulations, under 24 V.S.A. §4442. The purposes of this amendment are as follows: 1. Within Table 2.3, allow Retail Store (maximum 3,500 square feet) as a Conditional Use within the Village Commercial District in the portion of the West Charlotte Village located on the east side of Route 7; 2. Within Table 2.3, reduce the minimum setback from the Route 7 right-of-way to 30 feet (from 100 feet); 3, Within Table 2.3, add to the Purpose Statement for the Village Commercial District; and 4. Within Table 2.3, add and clarify District Standards for the Village Commercial District, in- ctuding a provision for increasing maximum lot coverage; 5. Within Table 5.1, add traffic im- pact analysis as a requirement for Site Plan Review (unless waived), and add turning movements, sight distance and safety analysis. Amendment #1 (as described above) will affect all land within the Village Commercial District on the east side of Route 7 in the West Charlotte Village. Amend- ments #2-4 will affect all land within the Village Commercial Dis- trict. Amendment #5 will affect all land within the Town of Charlotte. The proposed amendment wilt af- fect Table 2.3 and Table 5.1 of the Charlotte Land Use Regulations. Of Vermont, are hereby notified that the taxes assessed by such town for the tax years through June 30, 2007, remain, either in whole or in part, unpaid on lands and personal property hereinafter described and situated in said Town of Hinesburg, and so much of said lands and personal prop- erty will be sold at public auction at the Town Hall in Hinesburg on October 2, 2008, at 9:00 o'clock in the morning, as shall be required to discharge said taxes, inter- est, penalty, statutory costs and attorney's fees, unless previously paid. Information regarding the amount of taxes due may be obtained from Kohn & Rath LLP, P.O. Box 340, Hinesburg, Vermont 05461 (482-2905) attorneys for Melissa B. Ross, Hinesburg Tax Collector. Dated at Hinesburg, Vermont this 27th day of August, 2008. /s/ Melissa B. Ross Melissa B. Ross, Tax Collector Parcel 2: A certain 1973 Craftmade mobile home 12 x 60 conveyed to Eric Freeman by Vermont Mobile Home Uniform Bill of Sale from Gordon Russell and Jody Russell dated June 21, 2002 and of record in the Hinesburg land records and any appurtenances thereto. On knowledge and believe, the property is. known and designated as 182 Hiltview Terrace and has a tax parcel number of 000846. Parcel 3r A certain 1984 Cham- pion Titan mobile home 14 x 70 conveyed to George W. Gebicker and Lynda M. Shaffrey by Vermont Mobile Home Uniform Bill of Sale from Mount Pleasant Assoc. dated August 3, 1998 and of record in the Hinesburg land records and any appurtenances thereto. On knowledge and belief, the property is known and designated as 48 Hiltview Terrace and has a tax parcel number of 001262-22. .Parcel : All and the same lands and premises conveyed to Sheri- dan Lane by quit claim deed of Michael W. Lane dated August 19, 1985 and of record in Volume 55, Pages 281-282 of the Hinesburg Land records. On knowledge and belief, the property is known and designated as 477 Gilman Road and has a tax parcel number of 000603. Bimam DO©© Bmm© OE©B 13 13 EOM© BOMB ODOB a 13 UM103 BOB DOM 0013M [on ©© MOD©B Bal3O©B 003Bm0 ©©O aono© Boo© oo© Emu Bo©B©a Man= oB©© DUMB oo©© OMIMB© L,r rut Lin, 3u Klmoau Ave., Ste. 306, 27th day of P- �t, 2008. South Burlington, VT 05403, 802 A true copy. 660-9000. Attest: /s/ Melissa B. Ross Melissa B. Ross, Collector of Taxes, Town of Hinesburg, Vermont PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOP- MENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on October 7, 2008 at 730 P.M. to consider the follow- ing: 1. Preliminary plat application #SD-08-46 & final plat application #SD-08-47 of South Burlington School District for a planned unit development for an educational facility. The amendment consists of constructing a 33 foot high I ccessory structure (broadcast booth), 550 Dorset Street, 2. Final plat application #SD-08- 48 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC for a planned unit development to subdivide a 14.54 acre parcel into three (3) lots of 5.73 acres (Lot 96), 7.8 acres (lot 97), and 1.01 acres (lot #8), 47 Tilley Drive. John Dinktage, Chairman South Burlington Develop- ment Review Board Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hatt. September 17, 2008 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT DOCKET NO. S0969-06 CnC Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I, Inc., Trust 2005-HE2 Mortgage Pass -Through Certificates Series 2005-HE2, Plaintiff V. Rashied Lane, Ele Ballard, State of Vermont, Office of Child Sup- port, City Of Burlington State of Vermont, Department of Taxes And Occupants residing at 44 Luck Street, Burlington, Vermont, Defendants NOTICE OF SALE By virtue and in execution of the Power of Sale contained in a certain mortgage given by Option One Mortgage Corporation to Rashied Lane dated October 7, 2004 and recorded in Volume 891, Page 685 of the Land Records of the Town of Burlington, of which mortgage the undersigned is the present holder, for breach of the conditions of said mortgage and for the purposes of foreclosing the same will be sold at Public Auction at 4:15 P.M. on October Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee By: Corey J. Fortin, Esq. Lobe & Fortin, PLC 30 Kimball Ave., Ste. 306 South Burlington, VT 05403 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT DOCKET NO. S0595-07 CnC US Bank National Association, as Trustee JPMORGAN INVESTMENT BANK (JPMMAC) SECURITIZATION, Plaintiff V. Boudee Luangrath, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., as nominee for Fieldstone Mortgage Company And Occupants residing at 36 St. Louis Street, Burlington, Vermont, Defendants NOTICE OF SALE By virtue and in execution of the Power of Sale contained in a cer- tain mortgage given by Fieldstone Mortgage Company to Boudee Lu- angrath dated March 22, 2005 and recorded in Volume 909, Page 434 of the Land Records of the Town of Burlington, of which mortgage the undersigned is the present holder, for breach of the conditions of said mortgage and for the pur- poses of foreclosing the same will be sold at Public Auction at 3:00 P.M. on October 7, 2008, at 36 St. Louis Street, Burlington, Vermont all and singular the premises described in said mortgage: To Wit: A lot of land with dwelling house thereon situated on the east- erly side of St. Louis Street, the dwelling house being known and designated as Number 36 St. Louis Street having a frontage of 45 feet and a depth of 122 feet. Said lot comprises the whole of Lot Number 45 as laid down on a Plan of W.G. Shaw, of record in Volume 22, Page 107 of the Burlington Land Records. EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY All real estate advertising in this newspaper is subject to the Federal Fair Housing Act of 1968 and similar Vermont statutes which make it illegal to advertise any preference, limitations, or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, sexual ori- entation, age, marital status, handicap, presence of minor children in the family or receipt of public assistance, or an intention to make any such preference, limitation or a discrimination. The newspaper will not knowingly accept any advertising for real estate, which is in violation of the law. Our readers are hereby informed that all dwellings, advertised in this newspaper are avail- September 17, 2008 Pizzagalli Properties, LLC Bob Bouchard 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public hearing notice that was printed in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that. "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 5r5 Crux t .StrL`et outh 21-urlivgton, T o5 3 t j 02,. 4 .#'tog fix €�I��T.tt�(�.� 3�1 arvat .cbaart.com September 17, 2008 Dan O'Brien 150 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy M Donough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street Sautb Rurlivgtwn VT" 86403 lei :002-846.41.00 tax 602_85CMI wnw.1burf_UGM September 17, 2008 Douglas Dickey 80 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, "Tx, - Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. N?5 Dorset Street S ut a csrhn 'amp IWT 054C,; tel d?,. . lax 902,946AM xr a!ay. uv cam September 17, 2008 Brian Armstrong Lora Wilson 50 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Gi:aErci: ,i' tis4,o.i9 -. Ftt.§5.di11 swvawr.:.�ir6_crm September 17, 2008 David & Barbara Neff 700 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. i7 Grsr r-i: f:r�* 1 a� RlflhnqlanVT 05403 tel 902,94 AtI6 iax southburlington PLANNING & ZONING October 1, 2008 Bob Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 47 Tilley Drive Dear Mr. Bouchard: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, October 7, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 19 AUGUST 2008 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday, 19 August 2008, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: J. Dinklage, Chair; E. Knudsen, G. Quimby, M. Behr, R. Farley, M. Birmingham Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; C. LaRose, Associate Planner; P. Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning; B. Bouchard, D. Burke, B. Gardner, P. Brogna, B. Armstrong, A. Solomon, C. Sheil, D. Mallik, M. Townsend, C. Cobb, T. Dawson, W. & N. Seidel, S. McIntyre, C. Thabault, D. White, M. O'Day, D. Chenette, B. Hicken, S. Cohen, R. & B. Mukherjee, T. Sheppard, S. Angolano, C. Rainville, F. & S. Hackett, J. Forcier, L. Nadeau, G. Martin, J. Wilking, A. Lisius 1. Other Business: Mr. Belair noted that the next Board meeting will be held in the High School Cafeteria #3 due to a conflict with a re -scheduled City Council meeting. Mr. Belair introduced Paul Conner, the new Director of Planning & Zoning. 2. Minutes of 15 July and 5 August: Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 15 July as written. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed 5-0 with Mr. Birmingham abstaining. Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 5 August as written. Mr. Farely seconded. Motion passed 4-0 with Messrs. Knudsen and Birmingham abstaining. C3) Preliminary Plat Application #SD-08-39 Of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, for a planned unit development to subdivide a 14.54 acre parcel into three lots of 5.73 acres (lot #6), 7.8 acres (lot #7), and 1.01 acres (lot #8), 47 Tilley Drive: Mr. Bouchard noted they have submitted a full survey. The plan reflects that the property line has been pulled back to get the driveway further away from the neighboring residences. Mr. Dinklage noted receipt of a letter from owners of a residence dated 1 August, and also a report from RSG dated 15 April analyzing traffic. Mr. Bouchard acknowledged that there will be access to all lots from Tilley Drive, not from Old Farm Road. -1- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 19 AUGUST 2008 Mr. Dinklage noted that during the survey it was discovered that there has been encroach- ment by neighbors onto the applicant's property. Mr. Bouchard said the property owners have been informed and there will be discussions with their attorney. He was sure this could be worked out. Mr. Belair noted that the Armstrongs placed their pool where they believed it was 10 feet from the property line. With the issue of encroachment, it may turn out not to be 10 feet from the property line. Mr. Armstrong said he had been told that curb cuts and roads are not being decided at this time. Mr. Dinklage said that is true. He asked members for comments on the placement of the road where the neighbors object to it. Mr. Behr felt it was more in keeping with the other buildings; otherwise that lot would be parking lot. Mr. Dinklage felt there are measures that can be taken to mitigate problems such as headlights shining into homes. Mr. Belair noted that RSG's report did not answer the city's questions regarding the proposed curb cut on Tilley Drive. When specifically asked about that issue, RSG said that without Exit 12B, that drive will not be blocked, but with Exit 12B it probably will be blocked. Mr. Belair said he is therefore proposing condition #8 requiring that drive to be relocated as far to the east as possible when Exit 12B is built. Mr. Bouchard said they originally talked about building another entrance/egress if 12B is built. He noted that the proposed access would only be blocked for a few minutes a day. Mr. Belair said the stipulation could be changed down the road when 12B is built and when the project is built. Conditions will then be evident. Mr. Behr said he was comfortable with that. He urged the applicant to keep in mind the possibility of needing a second access. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-08-39 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Final Plat Application #SD-08-40 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of 54,324 sq. ft. (49,000 sq. ft. usable) medical office building. The amendment consists of constructing a 1700 sq. ft. single story addition to house an MRI machine, 192 Tilley Drive: Mr. Bouchard said the addition would have the same fayade as the building and would be located on the south side. The actual square footage is 1350 sq. ft., not 1700. A parking waiver is needed as the addition takes up 8 parking spaces in the rear of the building. The tenant provided a letter indicating they have adequate parking on site. Mr. Belair said staff has no issue with the waiver. Mr. Dinklage noted there is also a landscape waiver of $430 being requested. Mr. Belair noted that money could be used to screen the new chiller. Stipulation #5 was amended to require screening of the chiller to the satisfaction of staff. All references in the motion to 1700 sq. ft. were amended to read 1350 sq. ft. -2- Page 1 of 1 Betsy Brown From: Betsy Brown Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2008 11:13 AM To: 'bob.bouchard@pizzagalliproperties.com' Subject: DRB Minutes of Aug 19 -47 & 192 Tilley Drive Hi Bob — attached is a copy of the approved DRB minutes for Aug 19, which includes discussion on 47 & 192 Tilley Drive. -Betsy Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant 173 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Ph: 802.846.4106 emcdonough(ru,'sb url. com www.sburl.com 9/18/2008 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: September 29, 2008 \drb\sub\pizzagalli\final_3lotsub.doc Application received: September 11, 2008 PIZZAGALLI — 3- LOT SUBDIVISION 47 Tilley Drive FINAL PLAT APPLICATION #SD-08-48 Agenda #3 Meeting Date: October 7 2008 Owner/Applicant Contact Pizzagalli Properties, LLC Robert Bouchard 50 Joy Drive Pizzagalli Properties, LLC S. Burlington, VT 05403 50 Joy Drive S. Burlin ton, VT 05403 Engineer Property Information Donald Hamlin Consulting Engineers, Inc. Tax Parcel 1718-00047 136 Pearl Street 14.54 acres Essex Junction, VT Industrial Open Space Zonina District Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\final 3lotsubdoc Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking preliminary plat approval to subdivide a 14.54 acre parcel into three (3) lots of 5.73 acres (lot #6), 7.8 acres (lot #7), and 1.01 acres (lot #8), 47 Tilley Drive The project received preliminary plat approval on August 18, 2008 (minutes attached). Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on September 11, 2008 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements Lots #1-3 10 Zoning District Re uired Proposed 4 Min. Lot Size 3 acres 1.01 acres Max. Building Coverage 30% n/a Max. Overall Coverage 50% n/a Min. Front Setback 50 ft. n/a Min. Side Setback 35 ft. n/a Min. Rear Setback fj 50 ft. n/a zoning compliance + waiver requested pursuant to Article 15 of the SBLDR, PUDs The minimum lot size in the Industrial/Open Space District is 3 acres. The applicant is proposing one lot which does not meet this minimum. Minimum lot size requirements may be modified by the Board pursuant to a Planned Unit Development, or PUD. The Board previously discussed this issue and voiced a general consensus to reduce the minimum lot size and permit the 1.01 acre lot. This is reflected in the preliminary plat decision. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. The City of South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans for the subject project and most recently stated that they have no formal comments on the plans. They will seek further review of the plans at such time as land development is proposed. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING ldrb\sub\oizzagallilfinal 3lotsubdoc According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. Although no infrastructure or land development is proposed as part of this application, staff advises the applicant to obtain preliminary wastewater allocation as part of this approval. Final allocation will be assessed at such time as buildings are proposed; however, given potential shortages in allocation, it behooves the applicant to seek preliminary allocation at this point. Staff strongly advises that the applicant should obtain preliminary wastewater allocation. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. There are no roadways or buildings proposed as part of this application. At this time, it is merely a subdivision of one larger lot into three smaller lots. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. The applicant previously submitted a conceptual site plan which estimates how the buildings and related drives and parking areas will be organized. The applicant theorized two curb cuts from Tilley Drive, both aligned with existing curb cuts to the south. The applicant plans that both curb cuts service all three buildings. Staff was concerned that the western most curb cut is too close to the Tilley Drive/Hinesburg Road intersection and cannot handle the queuing of vehicles that the additional buildings will create and the connection of Tilley Drive to the interstate via the proposed ramp. A third party consultant has reviewed the plans and commented on this issue (memo from Resource Systems Group attached). RSG states that it would be appropriate for "the City to require one access drive placed as far as possible form the adjacent intersections (both existing and planned) in order to maximize and preserve capacity." The previous director of Planning and Zoning, Julie Beth Hinds, submitted a written memo advising the Board to permit the curbcut with conditions which would require future building design and site plan layout to accommodate cross -connections from the west to the east so that traffic could exit at the easternmost curb cut. The Board discussed this issue at preliminary plat review and instated a condition that at such time as the interstate exit is constructed, the access drive located between lots 6 & 8 shall be abandoned in favor of a new access drive to be located as far to the east as possible. 1. At such time as Interstate Exit 12B is constructed to Tilley Drive with a north bound off ramp, the access drive located between lots 6& 8 shall be abandoned in favor of a new access drive to be located as far to the east as possible. 2. All future site plans for the three lots created herein shall be designed so as to provide adequate and efficient circulation such that traffic shall most generally be directed away from the Hinesburg Road intersection. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\final Notsubdoc Staff notes that the only access to Lot 7 at this time appears to be across a Class III wetland. The applicant has submitted testimony from a wetlands expert which states that the subject wetlands on site do not carry any value in function for storage of flood waters, water quality, or other habitat or education components. Still, the applicant should understand that going forward, the Development Review Board shall have the authority to require alternate means of access to the rear lot across lands other than the 60 feet of frontage along Tilley Drive. Staff strongly urges the Board to limit access to the lots to Tilley Drive only. No access shall be permitted via Old Farm Road. This road is wholly residential and is not built to accommodate office or industrial uses. Access to the driveway accessing lots 6 and 7 should also provide access to the adjacent lot #2. 3. Access to the proposed lots shall be via Tilley Drive. No access shall be permitted via Old Farm Road. Under the terms of an existing 5-lot subdivision of lands access via Tilley Drive, the applicant is required to submit a trip generation and traffic analysis including turning movement analysis to be submitted as part of the review of the fourth building. Staff recommends that this condition be carried through to include this subdivision, should any of the lots proposed herein be developed prior to the existing lots. Resource Systems Group reviewed a traffic analysis prepared by the applicant and provided comments in a memo dated April 15, 2008 (attached). RSG explicitly states that the memo was intended for planning purposes only, and that until buildings are proposed with actual uses and square footages, it is difficult to understand detailed impacts. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The plans that the applicant submitted depict Class III wetlands on the subject property. These wetlands extend into the area where the access to the lots will likely be located. Staff will further assess impacts to wetlands as the access drives and buildings are proposed. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Per section 15.18B of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, a PUD in the Industrial -Open Space District shall comply with the following standards: 1) Open space and development areas shall be located so as to maximize the aesthetic values of the property in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan goal of preserving and enhancing the open character, natural areas, and scenic views of the Quadrant, while allowing carefully planned development. 2) Open space and any buffering shall be located in a manner that minimizes impacts on adjacent residential uses, if any. It is difficult to assess compliance with this criterion as no land development is proposed at this time. The applicant has noted the required 65 foot buffer adjacent to the residential zone. Staff will assess these criteria thoroughly at such time as buildings are proposed on individual lots. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING ldrb\sub\pizzagalli\final 310tsubdoc Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. As previously stated, no buildings or other land development are proposed at this time. Staff will assess this criterion at such time as more detail is provided. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. Until such time as the road network and buildings are proposed, there is no need for review by the Fire Department. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee has stated that they will review the plans when at such time as buildings are proposed; as with most other items included in this report, it is difficult to properly plan for infrastructure improvements until such time as buildings are proposed. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. Again, the South Burlington Recreation Path Committee reviewed the sketch plans for the proposed project at its meeting on Monday March 1, 2004. 4. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Until such time as the road network and buildings are proposed, there is no need for review by the City Engineer. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Until such time as the road network and buildings are proposed, it is not possible to assess these criteria. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\final 3lotsubdoc Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable No buildings are proposed at this time. This criterion will be assessed as individual buildings are proposed for each lot. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. No buildings are proposed at this time. This criterion will be assessed as individual buildings are proposed for each lot. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant should submit architectural details with the site plans for each individual lot. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant should submit architectural details with the site plans for each individual lot In addition to the above general review standards site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. At this time, Staff does not find a need for any additional access easements with the exception of an access to lot #2 as previously discussed. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\oizzagalli\final 310tsubdoc The plans do not show any dumpsters. The site plans for the individual lots should depict proposed dumpsters, adequately screened. Landscaping Pursuant to Section 13.06(A) of the Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to site plan and PUD review. Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations requires parking facilities to be curbed and landscaped with appropriate trees, shrubs, and other plants including ground covers. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(4) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas must be shown on the plans. The plans do not snow storage areas for the subject property. However, the proposed public roadway will utilize the public right-of-way for snow storage, so additional snow storage areas are not necessary for the proposed subdivision. However, staff notes that adequate snow storage areas should be depicted on the site plans for each individual lot. Landscaping budget requirements are to be determined pursuant to Section 13.06(G)(2) of the Land Development Regulations. The landscape plan and landscape budget shall be prepared by a landscape architect or professional landscape designer. All of the proposed parking areas on the subject property should be landscaped in accordance with Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations. The site plans for each individual lot should be revised to incorporate the landscaping provisions outlined in Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations. Other The survey plat notes that there are several encroachments onto the property from abutting residential properties. Staff notes that these encroachments are not considered or approved as part of this application. However, staff strongly advises the applicant to address these with the abutting property owners. Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Final Plat application #SD-08-48 subject to the numbered items in the comments section of this report. Respectfully submitted, Cathy a n aRose, Associate Planner i Copy to: Robert Bouchard, contact for applicant DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 19 AUGUST 2008 The South Burlington Development Review Board held a regular meeting on Tuesday,19 August 2008, at 7:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset St. Members Present: J. Dinklage, Chair; E. Knudsen, G. Quimby, M. Behr, R. Farley, M. Birmingham Also Present: R. Belair, Administrative Officer; C. LaRose, Associate Planner; P. Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning; B. Bouchard, D. Burke, B. Gardner, P. Brogna, B. Armstrong, A. Solomon, C. Sheil, D. Mallik, M. Townsend, C. Cobb, T. Dawson, W. & N. Seidel, S. McIntyre, C. Thabault, D. White, M. O'Day, D. Chenette, B. Hicken, S. Cohen, R. & B. Mukherjee, T. Sheppard, S. Angolan, C. Rainville, F. & S. Hackett, J. Forcier, L. Nadeau, G. Martin, J. Wilking, A. Lisius 1. Other Business: Mr. Belair noted that the next Board meeting will be held in the High School Cafeteria #3 due to a conflict with a re -scheduled City Council meeting. Mr. Belair introduced Paul Conner, the new Director of Planning & Zoning. 2. Minutes of 15 July and 5 August: Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 15 July as written. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed 5-0 with Mr. Birmingham abstaining. Ms. Quimby moved to approve the Minutes of 5 August as written. Mr. Farely seconded. Motion passed 4-0 with Messrs. Knudsen and Birmingham abstaining. 3. Preliminary Plat Application #SD-08-39 Of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, for a planned unit development to subdivide a 14.54 acre parcel into three lots of 5.73 acres (lot #6), 7.8 acres (lot #7), and 1.01 acres (lot #8), 47 Tilley Drive: Mr. Bouchard noted they have submitted a full survey. The plan reflects that the property line has been pulled back to get the driveway further away from the neighboring residences. Mr. Dinklage noted receipt of a letter from owners of a residence dated 1 August, and also a report from RSG dated 15 April analyzing traffic. Mr. Bouchard acknowledged that there will be access to all lots from Tilley Drive, not from Old Farm Road. -1- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 19 AUGUST 2008 Mr. Dinklage noted that during the survey it was discovered that there has been encroach- ment by neighbors onto the applicant's property. Mr. Bouchard said the property owners have been informed and there will be discussions with their attorney. He was sure this could be worked out. Mr. Belair noted that the Armstrongs placed their pool where they believed it was 10 feet from the property line. With the issue of encroachment, it may turn out not to be 10 feet from the property line. Mr. Armstrong said he had been told that curb cuts and roads are not being decided at this time. Mr. Dinklage said that is true. He asked members for comments on the placement of the road where the neighbors object to it. Mr. Behr felt it was more in keeping with the other buildings; otherwise that lot would be parking lot. Mr. Dinklage felt there are measures that can be taken to mitigate problems such as headlights shining into homes. Mr. Belair noted that RSG's report did not answer the city's questions regarding the proposed curb cut on Tilley Drive. When specifically asked about that issue, RSG said that without Exit 12B, that drive will not be blocked, but with Exit 12B it probably will be blocked. Mr. Belair said he is therefore proposing condition #8 requiring that drive to be relocated as far to the east as possible when Exit 12B is built. Mr. Bouchard said they originally talked about building another entrance/egress if 12B is built. He noted that the proposed access would only be blocked for a few minutes a day. Mr. Belair said the stipulation could be changed down the road when 12B is built and when the project is built. Conditions will then be evident. Mr. Behr said he was comfortable with that. He urged the applicant to keep in mind the possibility of needing a second access. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-08-39 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Final Plat Application #SD-08-40 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of 54,324 sq. ft. (49,000 sq. ft. usable) medical office building. The amendment consists of constructing a 1700 sq. ft. single story addition to house an MR1 machine, 192 Tilley Drive: Mr. Bouchard said the addition would have the same fagade as the building and would be located on the south side. The actual square footage is 1350 sq. ft., not 1700. A parking waiver is needed as the addition takes up 8 parking spaces in the rear of the building. The tenant provided a letter indicating they have adequate parking on site. Mr. Belair said staff has no issue with the waiver. Mr. Dinklage noted there is also a landscape waiver of $430 being requested. Mr. Belair noted that money could be used to screen the new chiller. Stipulation #5 was amended to require screening of the chiller to the satisfaction of staff. All references in the motion to 1700 sq. ft. were amended to read 1350 sq. ft. -2- Subdivision Plat Application Permit Number SD- - 8 APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW ❑ Preliminary Pq Final PUD Being Requested? z Yes ❑ No All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, 50 Joy Drive, South Burlington VT 05403 Tel # 660-6805 Fax # 660-6868 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 783 Pages 151-153 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 50 Joy Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel # 660-6805 Fax # 660-6868 4. CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Robert Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, 50 Joy Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel # 660-6805 Fax # 660-6868 a. Contact email address: Bbouchard@pizzagalliproperties . com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 47 Tilley Drive 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1718 - 0 0 04 7 Subdivision Plat Application 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): Pizzagalli Properties proposes to subdivide this property into three (3) lots (Lot 6 5.73 acres; Lot 7 7.80 acres; Lot 8 1.01 acres) with the intent of rnnctriirtinrr three anmmercial cffire buildings b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): There are presently no existing uses on this property except for a single story storage barn (40' x 601) that is approximately 20 years o1 d and scheduled fnr rPMniral c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): No existing uses to remain. Pizzagalli proposes three (3) commercial office buildings. Lot 6 (5.73 acres) apx. 54,000 s.f.; Lot 7 (7.80 acres) apx. 58,000 s.f.; Lot 8 (1.01 acres) apx. 3,500 s.f. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): Total proposed 115, 500 s . f . Existing buildings to remain 0 s.f. e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): Lot 6, 28, high, two floors. Lot 7, 28' high, two floors. Lot 8, 151, one floor. No existing buildings to remain. No basement, no mezzanines. f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): N/A g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 0 existing, 425 proposed. Office employees. Company vehicles unknown. h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 9 Subdivision Plat Application i. List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. There are no changes proposed in the subdivision survey plan submitted and received under the previously approved Preliminary Plat Review. 9. LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a. Size of Parcel: 14. 54 acres/633 , 362 s . f . (acres /sq. ft.) b. Building Coverage: Existing o square feet 9 % Proposed 57, 973 square feet 9.1 % c. Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing o square feet o % Proposed 239, 17 3 square feet 38 % d. Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing o square feet o % Proposed unknown square feet % Site plan is conceptual at this time. 9. WETLAND INFORMATION a. Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? N Yes ❑ No Class III b. If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands associated 50' buffers (describe) Yes. All Class III wetlands have been identified by our environmental wetlands engineers Gilman & Briggs Environmental. The location of said Class III wetlands and associated c. If yes, please submit the following with this application: buffers are shown on the enclosed survey. 1. A site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's wetland map. The survey enclosed shows the delineated Class III wetlands and buffer. 2. Response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria) 3 Subdivision Plat Application 10. AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 435,600 SQ. FT. * *Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. Conceptual site plan shows 435,600 s.f. of potentially disturbed area. Actual is unknown. 11. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 5,717,334 b. Landscaping: $ 79,966 Please submit itemized list of landscaping proposed) c. Other site improvements (please list with cost) $1, 449, 325 . Drives, parking lots, sidewalks, landscaped islands, utilities including stormwater systems, Water & sewer limes, 1 ri _ 1 , tel e rz�__o_n_e, etc. 12. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): 1, 100 average daily trips b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 148 vph in, 20 vph out c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 28 vph in, 134 vph out 13. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. 14. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday -Friday 15. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: December 2011 4 Subdivison Plat Application 16. PLEASE LIST ABUTTING LANDOWNERS, INCLUDING THOSE ACROSS THE STREET. You may attach on a separate sheet. North - Mr. Dan O'Brien, 150 Old Farm Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 North - Mr. Douglas Dickey, 80 Old Farm Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 West - Mr. Brian Armstrong/Ms. Lora Wilson, 50 Old Farm Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 West - Mr. & Mrs. David & Barbara Neff, 700 Hinesburg Road, South Burlington, VT 05403 East/South - Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, 50 Joy Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 17. PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application (see Exhibit A). tad , I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: 10/com plete ❑ Incomplete 5 Robert Bouchard PRINT NAME Subdivison Plat Application August 27, 2008 Bob Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Preliminary Plat #SD-08-40 47 Tilley Drive Dear Mr. Bouchard: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on August 19, 2008 (effective 8/19/08). Please note the conditions including that you must submit for final plat within 12 months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy Mc onough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7008 0150 0003 6150 7267 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com t , r or ,PLANNING & ZONING August 27, 2008 Brian Armstrong 50 OId Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 47 Tilley Drive Dear Mr. Armstrong Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Wak&ao� Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant 571 Da,stt Stroet Soui� aaart ngtr n, YT COfAt2 lei 802 844,1 G fax 80.248A1[11 yaw w.zburl.com July 29, 2008 Pizzagalli Properties, LLC Bob Bouchard 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public hearing notice that was printed in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, 6- Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Darsm.l Strait South Warlingto.m, YT D54 3 t 4 02-846 406 fax 802,846,4101 ww+ . hu.Va rra July 29, 2008 Mr. Dan O'Brien 150 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, &N-k- Betsy tMcough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Durset Street Southlaarhgqieq, VT 05403 141 8,02 846JID6 lax ww .,-hur .coo July 29, 2008 Mr. Douglas Dickey 80 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, r---) &Ia� Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 515 Darsat Street Soulk Burlington, VT 05403 Nei 802.-846.4306 iaz %WW W. zb a rL['i om July 29, 2008 Mr. Brian Armstrong Ms. Lora Wilson 50 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, 6(6w� Betsy Mc onough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 5� Darst-t Strait. 8out.b Iturilingion, VT W 403 W 602A46,tM lax 802.RM4M ,Wvc1,' nr9,C0M ou July 29, 2008 Mr. & Mrs. David Neff 700 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, 6W--2 Betsy Donough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 675 Furs t Street South :surlingtan, VT 05403 tai 802.848.01H fax. 6112.84. 51 w. w.sbur'.c a m _ J11V VV GlllU l.Gll. � V�./G11 LT/ / / JVJ. View and post up to Post & browse ads 6 photos per ad online.- at your convenience. -man Baldwin, P.E. Adopted 7/9/2008; Published - PUBLIC HEARING One National Life Drive STATE OF VERMONT Director -Technical. 7/30/2008; Effective 9/20/2008 SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOP- Montpelier, VT 05633-5001 CHIiTENDEN COUNTY; SS. MENT REVIEW BOARD Telephone: (802) 828-2717 CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT Material in [Brackets] delete. DOCKET NO. S899-06 CnC Material underlined add. The South Burlington Development A description of the methodology '/9/2008; Published Review Board will hold a public used in establishing this goal can Long Beach Mortgage Company, a 8; Effective 8/20/2008 OPENINGS - hearing at the South Burlington be viewed for 30 days following Delaware Corporation, BURLINGTO,N CITY COMMIS- City Hall Conference Room, 575- the date of this notice during nor- Plaintiff i [Brackets] delete. SIONS/BOARDS Dorset Street, South Burlington" mal business hours at the above v. ndertined add. Vermont on Tuesday, August 19, address. It is also available for William E. McMahon, Amy L. Mc - On Monday, September,15, 2008, 2008 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the viewing on our website:. http:// Mahon, State of Vermont Depart- rON DEVELOPMENT the Burlington City. Council will following: www.aot.staie.vt.us/Civi[Rights/ ment of Taxes, Sargent Construc- 1OARD fill vacancies on the following City Documents/VTransDBEGoalFY09. tion, Inc., Vermont Engine !acing Notice - August Commissions/Boards: 1. Appeal #AO-08-14 of Century pdf Service, Inc. And Occupants Partners, LP appealing the deci- residing at 53 Cloverdale Road, Cemetery Commission sion'of the Administrative Officer Comments pertaining to this Underhill, Vermont; Term expires 6/30/11 to deny Certificate of Occupancy overall goal willbe accepted at. Defendants" igfon Development One Opening #CO-08-26., 2 Market St. the above referenced address for card will hold a public a period of fifteen days follow- NOTICE OF SALE n Tuesday, August 19, CCRPC (Alternate) 2. Final plat application #SD-08- ing the completion of the thirty :00 p.m. in Contois Audi- Term expires 7/31/10 37 of East Mountain View, LLC day notice period. Comments will By virtue and in execution of ty Hall to consider the One Opening to amend a previously approved also be accepted by the Federal the Power of Sale contained in applications: plan for a 24, 400 sq. ft. 2 Highway. Administration, Vermont a certain mortgage given by_ DevelopmentReview Board (Alt.) story medical office building. The Division; Federal Building, P.O. Flexpoint Funding Corporation to VR/08-865CA; 185 South Term expires 6/30/11 amendment consists of revising Box 568, Montpelier, VT 05601. William E. McMahon dated October (WRL, Ward 5) Peter One Opening the location of a shared water line 18, 2005 and recorded in Volume :rits.Verdonk easement, 1100 Hinesburg Rd. Additional information about 149,,Page 199 of the Land Records single family home and Fence Viewer our DBE Program, including our of the Town of Underhill, of which ith new single family. Term expires 6/30/09 3. Preliminary plat application current DBE Registry, certifica- mortgage the undersigned is the hiding front yard setback Three Openings Police Commission #SD-08-39 of Pizzagalli Properties,. tion application, resource guides present holder, for breach of the equest Term expires 6/30/10 LLC for a planned unit develop- and links to other small busi- conditions of said mortgage and One Opening ment to subdivide a 14.54 acre ness resources can be obtained for the purposes of foreclosing MA/CA; 52 North Cove parcel into three (3) lots of 533 by visiting the DBE page of our the same will be sold at Public N, Ward 7) Tim Muir Board of Tax Appeals acres (lot #6), 7.8 acres (lot #7), website at: http://www.aot.state. Auction at 8:00 A.M. on August surfage parking tot Term expires 6/30/10 and 1.01 acres (lot #8), 47 Tilley vt.us/CivilRights/Dbe.htm 13, 2008, at 53. Cloverdale Road, to wetlands - remanded Two Openings Drive. Underhill, Vermont all and singular r Environmental Court All firms, both DBE and non- the premises described in said Board of Tax Appeals 4. Final plat application #SD-08- DBE, are invited to contact the mortgage: be Viewed in the Plan- Term expires 6/30/11 40 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC Vermont Agency of Transportation Zoning office, (City Hall, Two Openings to amend a previously approved for information regarding bidding To Wit: r, 149 Church Street, planned unit development consist- opportunities on federally funded Being all and the same land and n), between the hours of Telecommunications Advisory _ing of 54,324 sq. ft. (49,000 sq. projects. premises conveyed to William E. and 4:30 p.m. Comm. ft. usable) medical office build- McMahon and Amy L. McMahon by Term expires 6/30/10 . ing. The amendment consists of Dated July 25, 2008 at Montpelier, • Warranty Deed of. Devin Wilson and ite, AICP, Director of One Opening constructing a 1700 sq. ft. single Vermont Steffani Wilson dated 4 September and Zoning story addition to house an MRI 2003 and recorded, in Volume 130, Board for Registration of Voters machine, 192 Tilley Drive. STATE OF VERMONT Page 183 of the Land Records of Is who require special Term expires 6/30/12 CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. the Town of Underhill. ?ntsto participate are One Opening John Dinklage, Chairman CHITTENDEN. SUPERIOR id to contact the Depart- South Burlington Development DOCKET NO. 12-79-07 CnC Terms of Sate: $10,000.00 to be cast 72 hours in advance. Applications are,available at the; Review Board paid in cash by purchaser at iaton call 865-7188 Clerk/Treasurers<Office, Second EverHome Mortgage Company, time of sale, with the balance due . 2 TTY.). Floor, City Hall, and must be re- Copies of the,applications are Plaintiff at closing..Proof of financing for ceived in the Clerk/Treasuier's Of- available for public inspection at V. the balance of the purchase to be ;URLINGTON free by 4:30 p.m., Wednesday, Sep- the South Burlington City Hatt. Ebru Tega Esi And Occupants provided at the time of sale. The REGULATIONS tember 10, 2008. Applicants must residing at 128 Country Club Drive sale is subject to taxes due and be nominated by a member of July 30, 2008\ East, South Burlington, Vermont, owing tdthe Town of Underhill. ving traffic regulations the City Council to be considered Defendants V enacted by the Public for a position; a list of Council PUBLIC NOTICE Other terms to be announced nmission as amendments members is also available at the NOTICE OF SALE at the sate or inquire at Lobe & fix C, Motor Vehicles; and Clerk/Treasurer's Office. Please call Vermont Agency of Transportation Fortin; 30 Kimball Ave., Ste. 306, if Burlington's Code of the Clerk/Treasurer's Office at 865- Disadvantaged Business Enterprise By virtue and in execution of South Burlington, VT 05403, 802 . as: 7136 for further information. (DBE) the Power of Sale contained in a 660-9000: Overall Annual Goal on FHWA- certain mortgage given by Flagstar Jo parking except with The City of Burlington encourages Funded Projects Bank, FSB to Ebru Tega Esi dated Long Beach Mortgage Company, a narking permit. persons froma diverse backgrounds September 20, 2005 and recorded Delaware Corporation to apply to serve on_boards;"com- For Fiscal Year October 1, 2008 in Volume 728, Page 277 of the i shall park any ve- missions and committees. The City through September 30, 2009 : Land Records of the Town of South " By, Joshua B. Lobe, Esq. apt vehicles with a valid is committed to providing equal Burlington, of which mortgage lobe & Fortin, PLC narking permit or a valid opportunity to all persons without Pursuant to US Department the undersigned is the present 30 Kimball Ave., Ste. 306 ,s and clearly identifiable regard to political affiliation, of Transportation regulations holder, for breach of the condi- South Burlington, VT 05403 delivery vehicles on any race, color, religion, age, sex, - contained.in 49 Code of Federal lions of said mortgage and for the ;ignated as "residential sexual preference, national origin, Regulations, Part 26, all state purposes of foreclosing the same disability or any other -non -merit transportation agencies receiv will be sold at Public Auction at factor, ing Department of Transportation' 9:00 A.M. on August 13, 2008, s designated for residen- financial assistance must establish at 128 Country Club Drive East, ng at all times include: PARKS- overall percentage goals for the South Burlington, Vermont all and CITY PARKS ENUMERATED dollar value of work to be awarded singular the premises described in gh (3) As Written disadvantaged businesses. This said mortgage: That Chapter 22, Parks, of the action has been deemed necessary e south side of Colches- Code of Ordinances of the City in order to provide these busi- To Wit: r e► '� W!IN southlburlint®n PLANNING & ZONING August 14, 2008 Bob Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 47 Tilley Drive and 192 Tilley Drive Dear Mr. Bouchard: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, August 19, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, UN 6"),, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846,4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: August 13, 2008 \drb\sub\pizzagalli\prelim_31otsub.doc Application received: July 18, 2008 PIZZAGALLI — 3- LOT SUBDIVISION 47 Tilley Drive PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION #SD-08-39 Agenda #3 Meeting Date: August 19, 2008 Owner/Applicant Contact Pizzagalli Properties, LLC Robert Bouchard 50 Joy Drive Pizzagalli Properties, LLC S. Burlington, VT 05403 50 Joy Drive S. Burlington, VT 05403 Engineer Property Information Donald Hamlin Consulting Engineers, Inc. Tax Parcel 1718-00047 136 Pearl Street 14.54 acres I� Essex Junction, VT Industrial Open Space Zoninq District Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\prelim 31otsubdoc Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking preliminary plat approval to subdivide a 14.54 acre parcel into three (3) lots of 5.73 acres (lot #6), 7.8 acres (lot #7), and 1.01 acres (lot #8), 47 Tilley Drive The project was reviewed at the sketch plan level on November 20, 2007and December 11, 2007, and May 6, 2008 (minutes attached). Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on July 18, 2008 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements Lots #1-3 10 Zoning District Required Propose + Min. Lot Size 3 acres 1.01 acres Max. Building Coverage 30% n/a Max. Overall Coverage 50% n/a Min. Front Setback 50 ft. n/a Min. Side Setback 35 ft. n/a Min. Rear Setback 50 ft. n/a zoning compliance waiver requested pursuant to Article 15 of the SBLDR, PUDs The minimum lot size in the Industrial/Open Space District is 3 acres. The applicant is proposing one lot which does not meet this minimum. Minimum lot size requirements may be modified by the Board pursuant to a Planned Unit Development, or PUD. The Board previously discussed this issue and voiced a general consensus to reduce the minimum lot size and permit the 1.01 acre lot. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. The City of South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans for the subject project and provided comments in a memo dated July 23, 2008 (attached). CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\prelim 3lotsubdoc 2. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the South Burlington Water Department per the memo dated July 23, 2008. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. 3. The applicant shall obtain preliminary wastewater allocation prior to approval of the final plat. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. There are no roadways or buildings proposed as part of this application. At this time, it is merely a subdivision of one larger lot into three smaller lots. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. The applicant previously submitted a conceptual site plan which estimates how the buildings and related drives and parking areas will be organized. The applicant theorized two curb cuts from Tilley Drive, both aligned with existing curb cuts to the south. The applicant plans that both curb cuts service all three buildings. Staff was concerned that the western most curb cut is too close to the Tilley Drive/Hinesburg Road intersection and cannot handle the queuing of vehicles that the additional buildings will create and the connection of Tilley Drive to the interstate via the proposed ramp. A third party consultant has reviewed the plans and commented on this issue (memo from Resource Systems Group attached). RSG states that it would be appropriate for "the City to require one access drive placed as far as possible form the adjacent intersections (both existing and planned) in order to maximize and preserve capacity." The previous director of Planning and Zoning, Julie Beth Hinds, submitted a written memo advising the Board to permit the curbcut with conditions which would require future building design and site plan layout to accommodate cross -connections from the west to the east so that traffic could exit at the easternmost curb cut. The Board discussed this and were generally in favor. Still, it should be explicitly clear that no roads are proposed or approved as part of this application. 4. All future site plans for the three lots created herein shall be designed so as to provide adequate and efficient circulation such that traffic shall most generally be directed away from the Hinesburg Road intersection. Staff notes that the only access to Lot 7 at this time appears to be across a Class II I wetland. The applicant has submitted testimony from a wetlands expert which states that the subject wetlands on site do not carry any value in function for storage of flood waters, water quality, or other habitat or education components. Still, the applicant should understand that going forward, the Development Review Board shall have the authority to require alternate means of access to the rear lot across lands other than the 60 feet of frontage along Tilley Drive. Staff strongly urges the Board to limit access to the lots to Tilley Drive only. No access shall be permitted via Old Farm Road. This road is wholly residential and is not built to accommodate office or industrial uses. Access to the driveway accessing lots 6 and 7 should also provide access to the adjacent lot #2. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\prelim 31otsubdoc 5. Access to the proposed lots shall be via Tilley Drive. No access shall be permitted via Old Farm Road. Under the terms of an existing 5-lot subdivision of lands access via Tilley Drive, the applicant is required to submit a trip generation and traffic analysis including turning movement analysis to be submitted as part of the review of the fourth building. Staff recommends that this condition be carried through to include this subdivision, should any of the lots proposed herein be developed prior to the existing lots. Resource Systems Group reviewed a traffic analysis prepared by the applicant and provided comments in a memo dated April 15, 2008 (attached). RSG explicitly states that the memo was intended for planning purposes only, and that until buildings are proposed with actual uses and square footages, it is difficult to understand detailed impacts. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The plans that the applicant submitted depict Class III wetlands on the subject property. These wetlands extend into the area where the access to the lots will likely be located. The plans should be revised to depict the wetlands and their associated 50 foot buffers. 6. The plans shall be revised to include a full wetland delineation, including appropriate 50 foot wetland buffer zones. Staff will further assess impacts to wetlands as the access drives and buildings are proposed. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Per section 15.18B of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, a PUD in the Industrial -Open Space District shall comply with the following standards: 1) Open space and development areas shall be located so as to maximize the aesthetic values of the property in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan goal of preserving and enhancing the open character, natural areas, and scenic views of the Quadrant, while allowing carefully planned development. 2) Open space and any buffering shall be located in a manner that minimizes impacts on adjacent residential uses, if any. It is difficult to assess compliance with this criterion as no land development is proposed at this time. The applicant has noted the required 65 foot buffer adjacent to the residential zone. Staff will assess these criteria thoroughly at such time as buildings are proposed on individual lots. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. As previously stated, no buildings or other land development are proposed at this time. Staff will assess this criterion at such time as more detail is provided. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\prelim 3lotsubdoc The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. Until such time as the road network and buildings are proposed, there is no need for review by the Fire Department. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee has not yet reviewed the plans. Their comments should be considered but as with most other items included in this report, it is difficult to properly plan for infrastructure improvements until such time as buildings are proposed. %. The Recreation Path Committee shall review the plans and if warranted, provide comments prior to final plat approval. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. Again, the South Burlington Recreation Path Committee reviewed the sketch plans for the proposed project at its meeting on Monday March 1, 2004. 8. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Until such time as the road network and buildings are proposed, there is no need for review by the City Engineer. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Until such time as the road network and buildings are proposed, it is not possible to assess these criteria. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\prelim 3lotsubdoc No buildings are proposed at this time. This criterion will be assessed as individual buildings are proposed for each lot. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. No buildings are proposed at this time. This criterion will be assessed as individual buildings are proposed for each lot. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant should submit architectural details with the site plans for each individual lot. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant should submit architectural details with the site plans for each individual lot In addition to the above general review standards site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. At this time, Staff does not find a need for any additional access easements with the exception of an access to lot #2 as previously discussed. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans do not show any dumpsters. The site plans for the individual lots should depict proposed dumpsters, adequately screened. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\prelim 3lotsubdoc Landscaping Pursuant to Section 13.06(A) of the Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to site plan and PUD review. Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations requires parking facilities to be curbed and landscaped with appropriate trees, shrubs, and other plants including ground covers. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(4) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas must be shown on the plans. The plans do not snow storage areas for the subject property. However, the proposed public roadway will utilize the public right-of-way for snow storage, so additional snow storage areas are not necessary for the proposed subdivision. However, staff notes that adequate snow storage areas should be depicted on the site plans for each individual lot. Landscaping budget requirements are to be determined pursuant to Section 13.06(G)(2) of the Land Development Regulations. The landscape plan and landscape budget shall be prepared by a landscape architect or professional landscape designer. All of the proposed parking areas on the subject property should be landscaped in accordance with Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations. The site plans for each individual lot should be revised to incorporate the landscaping provisions outlined in Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations. Other The survey plat notes that there are several encroachments onto the property from abutting residential properties. The applicant should address this with the abutting property owners. Any such encroachments shall be removed or otherwise considered for approval as part of this application. Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Preliminary Plat application #SD- 08-39 subject to the numbered items in the comments section of this report. Respectfully submitted, f7 Cat Vnn Larose, Associate Planner Copy to: Robert Bouchard, contact for applicant July 23, 2008 Donald L. Hamlin Consulting Engineers P.O. Box 9 Essex Junction, VT 05452 RE: Mountain View Business Park 3 Lot Subdivision Dear Sirs: The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the Preliminary Plat for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below. 1. The attached Application for Water Allocation must be completed and returned to the South Burlington Water Department as soon as possible. As this project continues, the Application for Water Allocation will need final approval from this Department, which will be contingent upon available water storage capabilities within the City. 2. Based upon the final water allocation request, water service fees shall be applied to the project based on the current Rate and Fee Schedule. It must be recognized by all developers that the Rate and Fee Schedule established by the South Burlington City Council may be modified by resolution at an open meeting of the City Council, and therefore subject to change prior to completion of the project. 3. All future construction drawings and plans shall have a note saying "All water line and related work to be performed in accordance with the Champlain Water District Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances, henceforth the "CWD Specification." 4. A Champlain Water District (CWD) 24" transmission water main runs through this project area, as identified on the plans. There shall be no grade changes that will cause the transmission main to have less than 5.5' or more than 7' of cover to the top of the pipe within the CWD ROW. Further, no taps for this Mot subdivision shall be made on the CWD transmission main, unless approved by the CWD and SBWD. Finally, all other requirements as recorded in the CWD water main ROW shall be adhered to including but not limited to structure placement in the ROW. 5. All domestic services and fire sprinkler systems that are connected to the public water system shall be protected with a backflow prevention assembly, and an appropriate thermal expansion system in compliance with the Ordinance For The Control Of Cross Connections Within The Water System Of the City Of South Burlington, henceforth the `Backflow Ordinance." Please contact this department for more information on the installation and proper setting of backflow prevention devices. 6. Looping of all water lines shall be a design requirement. All looping connections shall be at a point so as to eliminate any dead ends on any water main. 7. Water main extensions shall be continuous to the furthest property line of the project. A dead-end water main shall have a fire hydrant or flushing hydrant installed at the end of the water main, unless approved otherwise by the appropriate CWD Supervisor. 8. Further review changes may be required as this project proceeds through the permit process. Future plans must include details and specifications as required in above. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, Jay Nadeau Superintendent CC. Cathyann LaRose Bruce Hoar Doug Brent Plan Reviews: ) ) ?U0_jR(, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 6 MAY 2008 5. Continued sketch plan application #SD-07-69 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC to subdivide a 14.5 acre parcel into three lots of 1.01 acres, 5.76 acres, and 7.77 acres, Old Farm Road & Tilley Drive: Mr. Plumeau stepped down during the hearing due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Bouchard said they have done the requested traffic study which was submitted to Mark Smith of RSG (the city's consultant). Their review was sent to staff after which the applicant met with Ms. Hinds and talked about the possibility that if the Interchange were to go in, there might be an alternate drive to the east. Ms. Hinds thought that was a good idea. Mr. Bouchard read from a memo Ms. Hinds sent to staff as follows: "It is perhaps the best option to allow the curb cut so long as the configuration of the two parking lots clearly makes it feasible to link all exiting traffic to the easterly curb cut in the future — in other words, make it possible for both buildings to use the easterly curb cut through cross -connections, etc. Conditions should make it clear to future occupants of the easterly building that their property can and will be crossed by traffic from the westerly building..." Mr. Dinklage asked if the westerly curb cut would be closed in that even. Mr. Bouchard said it would not. Mr. Dinklage noted the stipulation that there would be no access via Old Farm Road. Mr. Bouchard said the city requested the Tilley family to discontinue their curb cut and use the first westerly curb cut from this development, and a right-of- way has been given for that purpose. Mr. Armstrong said he respects the right of the applicant to develop the property, but he objects to the curb cut and the one -acre lot. He noted that RSG cited concern with congestion build-up. Mr. Armstrong felt there are other places to put the road. He said this way there would be snowplows at 3 a.m. right next to their backyard. Mrs. Armstrong cited the oddity of having alternating residential and commercial zones. She was also concerned with emissions in their backyard. She added there would also be 500 cars a day by their house and lights shining into their windows. Mr. Belair stressed that this application is just for a subdivision, and no development is being requested at this time. Mr. Dinklage said that when there is a specific plan, the Board would deal with buffering, shielding from lights, etc. Mrs. Armstrong said that when they talked to the developer they said the only thing they didn't want was the road to be located there, and that's where they put it. Mr. Bouchard said they are trying to pull the building as far from the neighbors as possible. If the drive is further to the east, there will be parking closer to the neighbors. Mr. Armstrong said he would prefer a parking lot which empties at 5 p.m. He felt there are other options for the road. Mr. Knudsen said he could imagine other circulation patterns which would pull the traffic away from the neighbors' homes. Mr. Dinklage asked the applicant to consider the points that had been raised. -3- BRIAN T. ARMSTRONG & LORA WILSON 50 OLD FARM ROAD, S. BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 August 1, 2008 RE: "Tilley 3" Dear Members of the DRB, Our efforts to work with the Pizzagalli Company to craft a mutually -agreeable solution that would allow us to maintain the quiet enjoyment of our home have been to no avail. While Pizzagalli did accede to the board's request to meet with us, we can only surmise from their responses that they do not have sufficient interest in addressing our concerns. As disappointing as that is, it is certainly their prerogative to adopt that stance. To date, our participation in the public meetings has been similarly frustrating. Our lack of regulatory expertise and our discomfort with the process has made us feel more like nuisances than participants. Despite the boards best efforts to make us feel welcome, we feel as though we are irritations that must be given our moment before moving forward with proposed plans. It is our understanding that our role is to ensure that the regulation cited here is adhered to as best as possible within reason: Quoting here from the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: B. Industrial -Open Space District. A Master Plan and/or P1TD in the Industrial - Open Space District shall comply with the following standards: (1) Open space and development areas shall be located so as to maximize the aesthetic values of the property in keeping with the Comprehensive Plan goal of preserving and enhancing the open character, natural areas, and scenic views of the Quadrant, while allowing carefully planned development. (2) Open space and any buffering shall be located in a manner that minimizes impacts on adjacent residential uses, if any. I'll cite two specific incidents that make us question why we are even invited to attend these meetings and whether our voice is heard, or even that this regulation is important in the process. First, the location of the access road along the boundary of the residential and industrial properties is in direct conflict with this regulation, our wishes and our stated request to Pizzagalh. Our request to relocate the road away from the adjacent residential area was ignored by Pizzagalli and dismissed by the DRB as it was implied that the regulations are "only a guideline". Secondly, Pizzagalli asked for a waiver of the minimum lot size of 3 acres in their initial proposal to subdivide the property. They sought to create a lot of a single acre. The board showed no hesitancy in granting the waiver. Our query about the practice of granting waivers brought the response that they are dependent upon the board's discretion. The bothersome conclusion is that rules can be objectively and subjectively decided. And the impact on adjacent residential areas does not seem to be terribly important. The painful irony of the combination of these examples, is that Mr. Dinklage actually said that the waiver was necessary to allow the road to go in the contested location. We cannot understand on any level how directing the majority of traffic flow directly behind and towards our house, offers "the least amount of impact." The dissonance between the DRB's complicity in this design and the profound objection of the effected abutting property owners has left us wondering what if any impact our inclusion in the process has? To review our wishes, we articulate the following points of concern: • Keep development and parking in the southern and easterly quadrants of the lot (see enclosed sketch.) This solution most obviously address the regulation sited above: Open space and any buffering shall be located in a manner that minimizes impacts on adjacent residential uses, if any. Thus minimizing noise, and visual impairment from the residential zone; • Restrict all vehicular access to Tilley Road and the new proposed driveway/road to the east and not funnel traffic near the residential zone. • Require the developer's landscape architect to work with the adjacent property owners to establish mutually -agreeable buffers that adequately hide the unwanted effects of parking lights and buildings from view, while maintaining the existing sunshine; • Explore the use of context -sensitive design to ensure that all new structures and appurtenances are harmonious with the semi -rural character of the site and surrounding properties. An example of this might be to incorporate architectural elements taken from barns. • Restrict building work times during exterior construction to between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, including deliveries and servicers; • Maintain the windmill in its current location, or if moved, within the view shed from our backyard; • Maintain our unobstructed view of Camel's Hump; • Facilitate and allow for sewer and gas line connections to both 50 and 80 Old Farm Road; Per your request, we have enclosed a rudimentary site plan to illustrate what we believe would satisfactorily address our concerns and best represent both the language and intention of the Regulation cited above. I do believe that your request for this plan is truly a good faith effort to create a fair and balanced plan and I remain eternally hopeful of that conclusion. Please do not hesitate to call me at home at 660-8333 should you need to do so. Very truly yours, Lora Wilson curnbular►d4�r .0 C-4, i ilk I Ism IFW �DuXx'11hG • t rrdvr r �Shrwb5/VIGw� ��0 CO"'Dictcq rtstdtnciL • E •rid s i*S R�5/Dnvo XMIAliPIrGpDsed butldowgs LANDS OF � LANDS NOW OR FORMERLY OF I O'BRIEN FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERS`IiP _ _ DANIEL J. & SANDRA T. 0 BRIEN VOLUME 420, PACE 345 ,{ NOTES / l VOLUME 74, PACE 419 (LOT / MAP VOLUME 430, PAGE 75 P I NO. 425 'PLAN FOUND 1/2' STEEL PIPE / 2.53' \\\ & MAP SLIDE NO. 425 I K* �t 4D 5GO-FwIAL OF 1 SEE PLAN ENTITLED & TILLEY FARM OLD FARM DAD SO. BURUNGTONN.VERMONT" PREPARED BY14DARY ONE REVISIONS RWARRENIGHT A. SEEPNOTE)1 N 842E \ 2.53' FOUND ALUMINUM PLA �' ""'" ' ylXgp INDUSTRIAL - T_ RODENSTIEN, L5. DATED JUNE 1983. LAST REVSED FEBRUARY 1987, AND FILED IN MAP /�Y2W 700' N 044*20 J2g7''�"�-y���,(-NO'IE�3i Y (IC) �p1VOLUME 252. PAGE.86 OF THE SWiH BURUNCTON LAND RECORDS. 1 ' "1-N 82Y2.07' IfNbjdl* �Ad_,2. $ER PLAN ENTITLED'PIZZAGAIU PROPERTIES, LLC P. 0. BOX 2009 SOUTH BURLINGTON, -�'I VTRMONT 05403-2009 OUNOARY PLAT SHOWING SUBOMSION OF LANDS OF PIZZAGAW PROPERTIES, LLC HINESBURG ROAD SOUTH BURUNGTON, VERMONY PREPARED BY DONALDHAMUN -f- 2002. AND CFI FILED IN MAP SURE NO.ONSULTING ENGINEERS. IN404 OF THE SOUTH BURUNCTON LANDRECORD 8, \\ // FOUND 3 8' STEEL PIN i.J•l-/"� \ rn r \yl� 1 •}--/ / 1 l F� 1 ¢1tf J I I l / l / `n-�' (UP 0.4') 1- �o I 58E ARYIDE'(\iL /CR01'ERN'MLFjANf1E� /1 3. SEE PLAN ENTITLED "SUBDVISION PLAN DANIEL J. O'BRIEN $ LED O'BRIEN JR. O'BRIEN <\ / �/s / NE .S HOME FARM KIMBALL AVENUE AND OLD FARM ROAD SOUTH BURUNGT'ON. VERMONT" SEE NOTE 1 I ( l I} PREPARED BY KREBS & LANSING CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC. DATED NOV&BER 18. 1996, BOUNDARY DETAIL LAST REVISED JULY 29, 2003, AND FLFD IN MAP SUDE NO. 425 OF THE SOUTH NOT TO SCALE POOL 1 I. BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. F' + cad,, 4. SEE RECORD OF SURVEY END D FARM OLD FARM RD. 50. SURLINGTONL ur: PREPARED AN SHOWING BY WARREN A.OSED ROBENs DENASION OF ,1LYS., OOULGLASSDICKEY / 2' DATED JUNE 1983, REVISED THROUGH MARCH 1985, AND RECORDED IN MAP VOLUME 197, VOLUME 667, PAGE 579 PAGE 65 OF THE SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. ROY PARCELS' 5. SEE HIGHWAY PLANS ENTITLED 'STATE OF VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS INTERSTATE MAP VOLUME 252, PACE 86 f'r \ 1• o \ I I I 11 I 1 I I I I O1 I ! I II 1 I l PROJECT IN THE TOWN OF SOUTH BURLINGTON RELOCATION HINESBURG ROAD' PROJECT NO. 1-89-3(14) PREPARED BY VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, SHEETS 22 AND 23.W0DO R F \��,J\\ 6. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS WAS OBTAINED FROM A FIELD TRAVERSE TO NOS STATIONS PG1965 1 f'f `lR, AND AB9665 AND IS REFERENCED TO VERMONT STATE PLANE COORDINATES - NAD83. 7. THE SUBJECT LANDS ARE LOCATED IN THE INDUSTRIAL -OPEN SPACE ZONING DISTRICT. SEE _4274' D N SP�IC ARTICLES 3. 6.04. AAPPENDIX C-2 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND DEVELOPMENT E 2OP6S I REGULATIONS ADOPTED MAY IZ 2003 WITH AMENDMENTS EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 24. 2006 p 83'Sfi' ' INDOSTwAc - I I 1 1� 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I I III I I I , Ij l 1 8. SEE PLAN ENTITLED 'SUBDIVISION PLAT ESTATE OF RUSSELL R. TIL EY" PREPARED BY BUTTON PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS P.C. DATED APRIL 1, 2004 AND FILED IN MAP SLIDE NO. 450 }} 1 -�--� I \ L_I- OF THE ONAL AND SURVEYORS LAND RECORDS \ �TH ESDEN/- -\_1tnAI - MOWtnw�1THiA WdSD\ I FOUND 3/e' STEEL PIN (SEE NOTE 1) ` \ I / I LOT 71 l `\ - - r 60srnOtl/OF vt7L. 17§4 0. 11PI I I I I I I LANDS of ,FJ2uNo s�B'\s>EEL�wM \ \ _ / / 7.80/1jCkFjS) I I I I I I I / B. T. ARMSTRONG & L J. WILSON _ -(SEE NOTE 1? \ `\ _ -/ /PORTION 0�' µOR I I I I 1 I I I / / / / / •f / / I Y .WRIG PARCELS' $ . _ \r. \` < /MAP kSUD ( NOI 4561 / / 1 1 I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 49.9Y 88. MAP VOLUME 252• PAGE 86 PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY S 8358b6' W HIGHWAY RECORDS VOLUME 1, PAGE 1 MOWED PA \ F1R7H \ // ••/ ///) / / l/� /l / / l l /l/ r / l I l P / / / FILE, AMr n PIPE / FOUND 3/e' S17>:L PIN j S0. EE NOTE T) acl (3, _ O,T'�), ji O x N 6'78 W �/ \ .jZ\ . O \ 1 \ I OP CONIFERSI ii %7,/ %/ 7� Y"'/ r-y- EE5 ENCROA% \ OUND 5/8'` I f PIA \ \ \ -• / \ ( / / / / / / . / / / / , / , / / , , / / / / \ (SEE NOTE 1) \ \�-��_L.1-.L_1 I I (1 / / / l / 'lot ` I \r ;\ \ \ \ .\ \ ,S-A3% -�/-� BITUMINOUS �l yp�` 7* 5) / / / / I r / / 17Z h A I \ ROADWAYS.. -<_7T7--Y- 1-- '-1--1j / L a= I a / I I I w 4J � 0 1-V U 1 r APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT ON THE DAY OF 2008 SUBJECT TO THE REOUIREMENTS OF SAN) CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS _ DAY OF , 200B BY , CHAIRMAN OR CLERK. f I \ j,- T' - \_a - --er �-.. ! -'�-*r • w T 1 r 7 -�-r- _i r-L L / '.< 1-4 Y y \�-1�,7y?-���-LyT'�---i-�- .\+T90_\. \ +1 •�+tt�SlO�I IA \ \ \ \ \ \ \ i' / / / / j 1 / / / / / % I - \\ N 33 w '�"`-I-trA \94+c\,. (� ��C�-^c. .. =••.•\�._ / i..� / / / l l I _.. rrli / - r 7'- 7 - 4--/ -r -I-- -:�GyAzc(Tib./'_WI L a ARBARA 'N€rF�ALL, - WI. PrA ( F 4^ 1 �I \ J / 1 MbONfAIN!/'POWER/(- / / / (kOr / r < 1 \ CHAMPbMM WATER DISTRICT \ T YADE U17U7f- �/ MAP SLIDE ,NjO. 4 I N --- l\ \ FOOT WIDE RR'I. i1\OF WAY I EA FRt I f 1 I 1 1 e / t� W ,,. W ,,. � \ � \ \ `VOLUL(E-102:,PAGE 106 / I =RAE RAGE 11671 \ I I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ( \ 1 \ 1 MAP OD PA i80 t A165EIF NiI� yW I °.oI N \\ `� \ /'.--"L9f � -1R / s9.4e 1E 671 PAGE 34 V 1� \ LVEL N 115J'16' E (W7 R,C oi' AnON) o' $ o - \ VE 1. • I99' \ \ - �ORTOTN / \ 5.73&CAES' W\ /(!Of r-' se27.721 Ell PORifON'OFI.oTB �4 I INq//p2RlA11- ; ( �» /. \ �g \\ \\ \\ f �AP SLIDE MD. J301 i 1 r /I / / // / / / i/// /� • r eisF\ =17E5• ,bsr ! / ",".")SETBACK '6E7BADK ! D. D. & B. F\ NET'P. J / / \ \ Cky oR i r 1 I I 1 f + / y 1 / I W� 1 W I 1S Fob[W,DE SEWER. EASEA�EtrT - 8o FOOT W,PE P D glcpr.oF1 Y1A l I I \'A `( VOL ME 171, PAGE 34 VOL 6P6, P 111 D/ f)99/P y�/�y w / /'POR• IVOL 783, . 1¢7 / \� s, `\ / 1H A. ACRE \ (Wines �2 GHTS BF RELOB `n«H}/ / MAP su°AENi M� (9�. P0� OF H I�T'B SyQE 4�0' - �' s� 1 •. I ,;In _\ll` \ _ ./ h BARN;r rum \� �P 1 ��' Nlz \ - '\ ` =\- -\ /Four FRONT haL / / I °�I° I i I I I i I I I 14- _ 1 zo.m'/ ,_ •�\\, \ \I •�- \- T Qs���{ar�-i i I,n� ' SO4'33.3y W 1 \ CJ l 1 I \ \% `<`----`�_--{'_'^..\_--_-I / I I 1 1 ( �^ �o.od�L--{1-1-j---F-1_I IJ-1I I1 1 I 1 1 N871P00 W / / i \ l N/ 77 i - _ - --- _ _ - T--k--FM FM L WIDENED PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY VOLUME 699, PACE 322 -' � l _-'T'-L-- 1 S 0045'08' W 218.58' THIS SURVEY WAS BASED ON RECORD RESEARCH OF PERTINENT DEEDS, OTHER OFFICIAL RECORDS, AND EVIDENCE RECOVERED ON THE PROPERTY. THIS PLAT COMPLIES NTH V.S.A. 1403 (Bx2)-(8). DATED THIS / DAY OF�+� 2008 Yr.LS. 0611 ICHAEL R. MA 0 LANDS OF PIZZAGALU PROPERTIES, LLC. ORIGINAL PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY I I , LANDS OF (FORMERLY PORTIONZOF VOLUME 2S5, NT COMPANY) VOLUME 606. PAGE III I PIZZAGALU PROPERTIES. LLC. (LOT A) E 111 (FORMPORTIONZOFGVOLUMEALLI V 215,HENT PACE CIll OMPANY) MAP SLIDE NO. 404 (LOT B) MAP SLIDE NO. 404 1127-r8,q _ - _j N BS10 39 E _ . hh-tir: obNO 3/4- STEEL PIPE NO IS ((C FOUND 1/2' STEEL (UP 0.3') SEE NOTE 1 LANDS OF PIZZAGALU PROPERTIES, LLC. PORTION OF VOLUME 681. PAGE 736 (LOT 2) MAP SLIDE NO. 445 PORTION OF PARCEL NO. 2 MAP VOL. 197, PAGE 65 /FOUND 3/4' STEEL (PIPE (SEE NOTE 1)1 5z.2B' S 00.45'08' W ),i S x. s SOUTH BUREING YON I WILLIST}ON' $ ( VICINITY MAP NTS LEGEND El FOUND VAOT 4- BY 4- CONCRETE MONUMENT PROPOSED 4' BY 4' CONCRETE MONUMENT PROPOSED 3/4' STEEL PIPE Q FOUND STEEL PIN (DIAMETER AND ORIGIN AS NOTED) O FOUND STEEL PIPE (INSIDE DIAMETER AND ORIGIN AS NOTED) A POINT NOT MONUMENTED - -4> - - UTILITY POLE WITH OVERHEAD UTLITY LINES APPROXIMATE EDGE OF WOODED AREA -- LAND BOUNOARY UNE - - - EASEMENT ONE W- APPROX. WATER MAIN -S- APPROX. SANITARY SEWER LINE FM- APPROX. SANITARY FORCEMAIN WOOD RAIL FENCE ----^395--- EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR ONE -- RI ZONING DISTRICT ONE ro -- CLASS 3 WETLANDS 50' WETLAND BUFFER ® EXISTING BUILDING STONE FENCE BUILDING SET BACK ONE -�_ 883218'819'S6 IIF� PLANNED 1011 FOOT WIDE RIGHT OF WAY (1-89 OFF RAMP) 9: I �o �X' I LANDS OF € PIZZAGALU PROPERTIES. LLC. PORTION OF VOLUME 681. PAGE 736 i I (LOT 1) O� I MAP SLIDE NO. 445 GRAPHIC SCALE ao as ,m ( IN FEET ) 1 b ch - 60 ft. m PORTION OF PARCEL NO. 2 MAP VOL. 197. PAGE 65 RECEIVED W45'08!L JUL 18 2008 W I� S 8716'S9' 10.D'5'OB' ' W -S 00'4 City of So. Burlington ,V4.......... A, 441 MICHAEL':'.T R. 7 MAGOON ; o C N0. 611 ,•� �E;O .......D ,F4V•...D0� CITY CLERK'S OFFICE SO. BURLINGTON, VT. __ , 2008 RECEIVED FOR RECORD AT _ O'CLOCK M., AND RECORDED IN VOL. OF MAPS ON PAGE ATTEST S. BURUNGTON, W. MUNICIPAL CLERK IRISIG INC. itF:S0VRt F SYSTFA1S GROUP, INC. MEMORANDUM To: Juli-Beth Hinds, South Burlington City Director of Planning and Zoning From: Mark Smith, PE, Senior Associate Subject: Review of the Tilley III Subdivision TIS Date: 15 April 2008 Copy to: Ray Belair, City Administrative Officer We have reviewed the letter report from Jeff Kershner at DL Hamlin Consulting Engineers (DLHCE), dated March 24, 2008, concerning the above referenced project. The intent of this review is twofold; first to provide feedback on the studied traffic impacts due to the development, and second, to provide technical guidance to the City concerning the potential effect of the planned connection of Tilley Drive to Community Drive in Technology Park, as well as the plans for Exit 12B. Below are our findings. The DLHCE report generally follows VTras' GuklFQH IRr TrIIII); , P SIWGWdIH, Ind (aJ 1133 progresses through the expected trip generation and the necessary series of analyses for the Tilley Drive/s T 11S intersection. However, there are some important items that appear to be missing. The report does not consider potential impacts at the Kennedy Drive/s T 11S intersection. Typically, intersections that experience 15 or more trips from a proposed development would be included in an analysis such as this. Based on the proportions of existing turning movements at Tilley Drive, the Kennedy Drive intersection would see over 200 additional vehicles from the Tilley II build out in the PM peak hour. We recommend an additional analysis be included that shows the likely distribution of traffic onto the public network, to the extent that intersections experiencing T5 or more vehicles from the development are determined. The findings and recommendations for improvements at Tilley Drive/s T11S appear to be reasonable, however volume diagrams and analysis worksheets were not provided, and therefore cannot be confirmed. As requested, we used the Chittenden County transportation model to determine the effect of connecting Tilley Drive to Community Drive. We ran the model with and without this connection to estimate the net change in traffic. While a complete explanation of the workings of this model are beyond the scope of this memorandum, it should be noted that the model is intended for planning purposes only, and that 60 Lake Street, Unit 1E .. 8Uri3ng.ton, VerMont 054.01 .T 1sf..802..383.01.18 - VAX 802..383.0122 . w ww.rs3g4nc..com Project Memorandum 15 April 2008 Resource Systems Group, Inc. it should not be used to determine specific impacts, such as the need for roadway or intersection improvements. page 2 The results of this analysis are summarized in the figure below, which shows the estimated change in traffic (vehicles) for the year 2013 in the PM peak hour, at the Tilley Drive/s T 11S intersection, due to the Community Drive connection. Figure 1: Hx�iected Change in Tra zc Due to Connection to Community Drive (in vehicle 2013 PM Peak hour -1SSO +35 V +1S0 +200 Tilley Drive -80 +85 sT11S As you are aware, Resource Systems d roup has undertaken a study of the traffic effects and necessary roadway alignments for several alternatives of a new interstate interchange at this location. All work performed for this study to date is preliminary, and no conclusions have been made. The alternative studied that connects the northbound off ramp to Tilley Drive would of course add a substantial amount of traffic here (preliminary results show approximately 400 vehicles exiting the interstate here in the 2018 PM Peak Hour, with 330 left and 10 right turns onto Tilley Drive). This traffic will have a substantial impact on the intersection at s T 11S, in addition to the traffic impact from the connection to Technology Park. With respect to the planned development curb cuts, it should be noted that good access management practices dictate that the number of curb cuts on adjacent public highways are reduced as much as practicable. Since Tilley Drive is planned as a through road with the potential for substantially more traffic in the future, it is logical to treat this road functionally as a collector road, at a minimum. In addition, the realization of plans for connecting the planned I-8VExit 12B Northbound off -ramp to this Project Memorandum 15 April 2008 Resource Systems Group, Inc. page 3 road would raise its functional class to the highest possible, as it will then be within the effective area of influence of the federal interstate system. For these reasons it is essential to minimize curb cuts on Tilley Drive and, in our opinion, appropriate for the City to require one access drive placed as far as possible from the adjacent intersections (both existing and planned), in order to maximize and preserve capacity. END OF MEMO Page 1 of 1 Juli Beth Hinds From: Mark Smith [msmith@rsginc.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 4:11 PM To: Juli Beth Hinds Subject: RE: Review of Tilley III TIS 1) With a traffic signal, a new SB left turn lane, a 2 lane westbound approach, and the connector, the closest drive will not be blocked. 2) With Exit 12B, a NB off —ramp to Tilley, and the connector, it will likely be blocked. ----------------------------------------------- Mark Smith, P.E. Resource Systems Group Inc. 60 Lake Street, Suite 1 E Burlington, VT 05401 TEL 802.383-0118 ext 304 - FAX 802.383-0122 - wwwrsginc.co.m From: Juli Beth Hinds [mailto:JHinds@sburl.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 3:20 PM To: Mark Smith Subject: RE: Review of Tilley III TIS Fundamental question: under the projected conditions, will stacking effectively block the proposed curb cut that's closest to Tilley Drive? Juli Beth Hinds, AICP Director of Planning & Zoning City of South Burlington .5 5 Dorset Street South. Burlington, %rr 05403 (802) 846-4io6/4101 fax jhinds@shurl.coni cam w.sburl.com From: Mark Smith [mailto:msmith@rsginc.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 2:37 PM To: Juli Beth Hinds Cc: ray Subject: Review of Tilley III TIS Juli-Beth; Please see attached. Let me know if this meets your expectations Mark Mark Smith, P.E. Resource Systems Group Inc. 60 Lake Street, Suite 1 E Burlington, VT 05401 TEL 802.383-0118 ext 304 - FAX 802.383-0122 - www.rsginc.com 4/ 15/2008 Subdivision Plat Application v Permit Number SD- �y APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW N Preliminary ❑ Final PUD Being Requested? 6 Yes ❑ No All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, 50 Joy Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel 802-660-6805; Fax 802-660-6868 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 783 Pages 151-153 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax#) Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 50 Joy Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel 802-660-6805; Fax 802-660-6868 4. CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Robert Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, 50 Joy Drive, South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel 802-660-6805; Fax 802-660-6868 a. Contact email address: Bbouchard@pizzagalliproperties . com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 47 Tilley Drive 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1718-00047 1 Subdivision Plat Application 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): Pizzagalli Properties proposes to subdivide this property into three (3) lots (Lot 6, 5.73 acres; Lot 7, 7.80 acres; Lot 8, 1.01 acres) with the intent of constructing three commercial office buildings. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): There are presently no existing uses on this property except for a single story barn (40' x 601) that is approximately 20 years old and scheduled for removal. c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): No existing uses to remain. Pizzagalli proposes three (3) commercial office buildings. Lot 6 (5.73 acres) apx. 50,000 SF; Lot 7 (7.80 acres) apx. 58,000 SF; Lot 8 (1.01 acres) apx. 3,500 F. d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): Total proposed 115, 000 SF Existing buildings to remain 0 SF e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): Lot 6 28' high, two floors. Lot 7 28' high, two floors. Lot 8 15' high, one floor. No existing buildings to remain. No basements, no mezzanines. f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): N/A g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 0 existing, 425 proposed. Office employees. Company vehicles unknown. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Subdivision Plat Application i. List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. A proposed change in the subdivision from Sketch to Preliminary Review exists in the northwest corner of Lot #6, thereby reducing Lot 6 by .03 acres to 5.73 acres and increasing Lot 7 by .03 acres to 7.80 acres. 9. LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a. Size of Parcel: 14.54 acres/633 , 362 SF (acres /sq. ft.) b. Building Coverage: Existing 0 square feet 0 % Proposed 57.973 square feet 9.1 % c. Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing 0 square feet 0 % Proposed 239, 173 square feet 38 % apx . d. Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing 0 square feet 0 % Proposed unknown square feet % Site plan is conceptual at this time. 9. WETLAND INFORMATION a. Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? X Yes ❑ No Class III. b. If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands associated 50' buffers (describe) Yes. Some Class III wetlands have been identified by our environmental wetlands consultants Gilman & Briggs Environ- mental. The location of said Class III wetlands and their associated 50, c. If yes, please submit the following with this application: buffers are shown on the conceptual subdivision plan enclosed. 1. A site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's wetland map. Previously submitted. Survey enclosed shows delineated Class III wetlands and associated buffers. 2. Response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria) 9 Subdivision Plat Application 10. AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: 435,600 SQ. FT. * *Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one (1) acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. Conceptual site plan shows 435,600 SF of potentially disturbed area. Actual is unknown. 11. COST ESTIMATES of Conceptual Site Plan a. Building (including interior renovations) $ 5,717,334 b. Landscaping: $ 79, 966 Please submit itemized list of landscaping proposed) c. Other site improvements (please list with cost) $1, 449, 325. Drives, parking lots, sidewalks, islands, utilities including stormwater systems, water lines, sewer lines, electrical, telephone, etc. 12. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): 1,100 average daily trips b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 148 vph in, 20 vph out c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 28 vph in, 134 vph out 13. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8 : 00 a.m. - 5 : 00 p . m . 14. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday - Frida 15. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: October 2010 4 Subdivision Plat Application 16. PLEASE LIST ABUTTING LANDOWNERS, INCLUDING THOSE ACROSS THE STREET. You may attach on a separate sheet. North - Mr. Dan O'Brien, 150 Old Farm Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 North - Mr. Douglas Dickey, 80 Old Farm Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 West - Mr. Brian Armstrong/Ms. Lora Wilson, 50 Old Farm Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 West - Mr. & Mrs. David Neff, 700 Hinesburg Road, So. Burlington, VT 05403 East/South - Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, 50 Joy Drive, So. Burlington, VT 05403 17. PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Aa�t�--4— ,�7 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT i //J �Otie� +-4. r_ /vOLt C �d G SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line 5 Subdivision Plat Application DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: 9'Gom L Incomplete r� ctor of Plarfning & Zoning or Designee May 22, 2008 Bob Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Minutes — 3 lot subdivision Dear Mr. Bouchard: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved May 6, 2008 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, (--&* 6ak—) Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. D3k South YT54 lssl 8o �84.RXt4..8ili xrtaw.ur. May 22, 2008 Bob Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Minutes — 3 lot subdivision Dear Mr. Bouchard: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved May 6, 2008 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street $arhngtcn, VT 454a 2 Net &02 f4E :,06 i A X 11112 04 s.4 01 'A'W YV sV9l z',9 fTM IsAm�� 1 o southurlington PLANNING & ZONING April 30, 2008 Bob Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Tilley Drive/Old Farm Road Subdivision Dear Mr. Bouchard: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, May 6, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. S' cerely, l Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tal 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Page I of I Betsy Brown From: J.B. Hinds [thelivingjuj@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2008 9:32 AM To: ray; Cathyann LaRose; Betsy Brown Subject: Tilley Drive - Pizzagalli application Aloha! THis is for the DRB tonight. Once it's on functional letterhead, could you please eek-mail a copy to Bob Bouchard? Tx! To: South Burlington DRB From: JBH's evil twin RE: Pizzagalli - Mountain View Business Park application Date: May 6, 2008 As the DRB is well aware, the City and Chittenden County MPO have been studying the possible alignments for an Exit 12B in the area of Hinesburg Road. An interchange has long been planned, and presumed to involve the Chetti/Larkin and Tilley/Pizzagalli properties on the north side of I-89. The current studies for 12B are being performed by Resource Systems Group, Inc. (RSG). RSG's draft studies to date clearly indicate that Tilley Drive will be involved in any interchange configuration, and will become part of the Federal Aid Highway system. Therefore, the City is well advised to look carefully at the implications of development on Tilley Drive for the future interchange system. The application in front of the board tonight would create curb cuts on the north side of Tilley Drive to service the proposed new buildings. New development and curb cuts on Tilley Drive are NOT in conflict with a future interchange. The relevant question is the placement and number of curb cuts, and how these might affect future traffic operations. As part of the review of the Pizzagalli Properties' application for the Mountain View Business Park, staff asked RSG to evaluate the proposed buildings, parking lots, and curb cut locations in light of the traffic model and alignment analysis that has been completed to date for exit 12B. The upshot of RSG's report is as follows: In the 2030 'build' condition with an interchange at Exit 12B, Tilley Drive westbound towards Hinesburg Road will see heavy PM peak hour trips (possibly exceeding 1,000 per hour). The stacking at the intersection with Hinesburg Road and Tilley Drive will back up beyond the first curb cut (the one farthest to the west, and closest towards Hinesburg Road). While this does not appear to create any safety issues, it will become a congestion point. Cars attempting to exit the parking lot will experience delays getting into the westbound queue. A left - turn movement to go east on Tilley Drive across traffic would be difficult and left turns should be discouraged or prohibited once there is an interchange in place. The second curb cut, farther away from Hinesburg Road, does not pose any issues for the future build condition. The DRB will need to consider whether the westerly curb cut should be permitted, and whether to impose conditions. It is perhaps the best option to allow the curb cut so long as the configuration of the two parking lots clearly makes it feasible to link all exiting traffic to the easterly curb cut in the future - in other words, make it possible for both buildings to use the easterly curb cut through cross -connections, etc. Conditions should be included making it clear to future occupants of the easterly building that their property can and will be crossed by traffic from the westerly building to get to the Tilley Drive curb cut. Windows Live SkyDrive lets you share files with faraway friends. Start sharing. 5/6/2008 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Development Review Board FROM: Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner UCL' RE: Agenda #8 Sketch Plan Application #SD-07-69 Agenda #9 Final Plat Plan Application #SD-07-78 DATE: January 18, 2008 Planning and Zoning Staff respectfully requests a continuance of agenda items #8 and #9. Staff has reviewed both applications and finds that there are a few outstanding issues which need be resolved before the hearings should be commenced. With respect to Agenda #8 Sketch Plan Application #SD-07-69, staff is awaiting additional traffic information. With respect to Agenda #9 Final Plat Plan Application #SD-07-78, staff is working with the applicant with respect to a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) to certify that the proposed building is not located the flood plain. Staff recommends that the Board continue both applications to the next available meeting, February 5, 2008. )AGaYbA 4�7 5 Cathyann LaRose From: Bob Bouchard [Bob.Bouchard@pizzagalIiproperties.com] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 5:02 PM To: Cathyann LaRose; ray Subject: Request for Continuance for Tilley II I Subdivision - 47 Tilley Drive Dear Cathy: I have received a copy of the proposed DRB Agenda for Tuesday March 18th. Our traffic study is being completed now for the Tilley III subdivision, but it needs to go to RSG for review. If possible, we would like to request another continuance for this subdivision sketch review (#SD-07-69). Please contact me with any questions. Sincerely: Bob Bouchard Robert Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 50 Joy Drive, PO Box 2009 South Burlington, VT 05407 T.802.660.6805 F.802.660.6868 bbouchard a@pizzagalliproperties.com NOTICE: Our website can now be viewed at www. ip zzagalliDro ep rties. com. 3/11/2008 I r� southburlington PLANNING & ZONING April 11, 2008 Bob Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Old Farm Road/Tilley Drive 3 Lot Subdivision Dear Mr. Bouchard: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, April 15, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com qJe vWo-- 41- 4 Cathyann LaRose From: Bob Bouchard [Bob.Bouchard@pizzagalIiproperties.com] Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 3:25 PM To: Cathyann LaRose Subject: Request for Continuance for Tilley III Subdivsion Hi Cathy: Pursuant to our recent phone conversation, Pizzagalli Properties would like to request a continuance for our Sketch Subdivision Review of the Tilley III property (47 Tilley Drive) until May 6th, 2008. Please contact me with any questions. Sincerely: Bob Bouchard Robert Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 50 Joy Drive, PO Box 2009 South Burlington, VT 05407 T. 802.660.6805 F.802.660.6868 bbouch.a_rd@pizzagallipro.pertes._com NOTICE: Our website can now be viewed at www.aizza�alliproperties.com. 4/10/2008 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: April 25, 2008 \drb\sub\pizzagaIIksketch_3lotsub2.doc Application received: April 18, 2008 PIZZAGALLI — 3- LOT SUBDIVISION 47 Tilley Drive SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-07-69 Agenda #5 Meeting Date: ay 6, 2008 Owner/Applicant Contact Pizzagalli Properties, LLC Robert Bouchard 50 Joy Drive Pizzagalli Properties, LLC S. Burlington, VT 05403 50 Joy Drive S. Burlington, VT 05403 Engineer Property Information Donald Hamlin Consulting Engineers, Inc. Tax Parcel 1718-00047 136 Pearl Street 14.54 acres Essex Junction, VT Industrial Open Space Zonina District Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\sketch 3lotsubdoc Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting sketch plan review of a planned unit development to subdivide a 14.54 acre parcel into three (3) lots of 1.01 acres, 5.76 acres, and 7.77 acres. The project was reviewed on November 20, 2007 (minutes attached) and was continued to December 11, 2007 (minutes attached) so that the applicant could provide a conceptual sketch of the layout of the buildings on the proposed lots and again to May 6, 2008 so that the applicant could submit a traffic study, which has also been reviewed by a third party consultant. The applicant has provided this sketch and the staff comments have been revised in response to this. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on April 18, 2008 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements Lots #1-3 10 Zoning District Required Proposed 4 Min. Lot Size 3 acres 1.01 acres Max. Building Coverage 30% n/a Max. Overall Coverage 50% n/a Min. Front Setback 50 ft. n/a Min. Side Setback 35 ft. n/a Min. Rear Setback 50 ft. n/a zoning compliance 4 waiver requested pursuant to Article 15 of the SBLDR, PUDs The minimum lot size in the Industrial/Open Space District is 3 acres. The applicant is proposing one lot which does not meet this minimum. Minimum lot size requirements may be modified by the Board pursuant to a Planned Unit Development, or PUD. The Board should discuss this issue and render guidance. 1. The Board should discuss the requested lot size modification and render guidance. If the Board permits the reduction in lot size, all further applications must be processed as a PUD. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\oizzagalli\sketch 3lotsubdoc According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. 2. The City of South Burlington Water Department shall review the plans for the subject project, prior to preliminary plat approval. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. 3. The plans should be revised to show the location of all proposed sewer lines, prior to submittal of the preliminary plat plans. 4. The applicant shall obtain preliminary wastewater allocation prior to approval of the final plat. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. 5. The applicant shall submit grading and erosion control plans as part of the preliminary application. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. The applicant has submitted a conceptual site plan which estimates how the buildings and related drives and parking areas will be organized. The applicant is proposing two curb cuts from Tilley Drive, both aligned with existing curb cuts to the south. The applicant is proposing that both curb cuts service all three buildings. Staff is concerned that the western most curb cut is too close to the Tilley Drive/Hinesburg Road intersection and cannot handle the queuing of vehicles that the additional buildings will create and the connection of Tilley Drive to the interstate via the proposed ramp. A third party consultant has reviewed the plans and commented on this issue (memo from Resource Systems Group attached). RSG states that it would be appropriate for "the City to require one access drive placed as far as possible form the adjacent intersections (both existing and planned) in order to maximize and preserve capacity." Staff recommends that the Board permit the western curb cut to serve only the smallest building on Lot 1. It should not be accessible to the other lots. 6. Access to the western, 1.01 acre lot shall be permitted across from the existing curb cut to the south which currently serves 62 Tilley Drive. This access shall not serve any other lots. The second proposed curb cut is to the east, and also aligned with an existing curb cut to the south. It is sited appropriately. However, the access here would best be constructed in a more CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\oizzagalli\sketch 3lotsubdoc linear fashion so as best to access the rear lot without undue traffic through the parking areas closest to the building. 7. The access to proposed "Lots 6 and 7" shall be across from the existing curbcut on Tilley Drive which serves 118 Tilley Drive. It shall be designed in a manner which safely and efficiently serves both lots. This shall be reviewed carefully at such time as the application seeks PUD review for buildings on said lots. Staff strongly urges the Board to limit access to the lots to Tilley Drive only. No access shall be permitted via Old Farm Road. This road is wholly residential and is not built to accommodate office or industrial uses. Access to the driveway accessing lots 6 and 7 should also provide access to the adjacent lot #2. 8. Access to the proposed lots shall be via Tilley Drive. No access shall be permitted via Old Farm Road. Under the terms of an existing 5-lot subdivision of lands access via Tilley Drive, the applicant is required to submit a trip generation and traffic analysis including turning movement analysis to be submitted as part of the review of the fourth building. Staff recommends that this condition be carried through to include this subdivision, should any of the lots proposed herein be developed prior to the existing lots. Resource Systems Group reviewed a traffic analysis prepared by the applicant and provided comments in a memo dated April 15, 2008 (attached). The applicant should address the issues and comments of the report, prior to preliminary plat approval. 9. The applicant shall address the questions and comments of the technical traffic review by RSG, per the memo dated April 15, 2008. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The plans that the applicant submitted depict Class III wetlands on the subject property. These wetlands extend into the area where the access to the lots will likely be located. The plans should be revised to depict the wetlands and their associated 50 foot buffers. 10. The conceptual plans shall be revised to include a full wetland delineation, including appropriate 50 foot wetland buffer zones. Staff will further assess impacts to wetlands as the access drives and buildings are proposed. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Staff feels that the proposed project is in keeping with the planned development patterns of the 10 Zoning District. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\sketch 31otsubdoc As previously stated, the applicant will likely need to revise the conceptual layout of the proposed buildings. Staff will assess this criterion at such time as more detail is provided. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. Until such time as the road network and buildings are proposed, there is no need for review by the Fire Department. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee has not yet reviewed the plans. 11. The Recreation Path Committee shall review the plans and if warranted, provide comments prior to preliminary plat approval. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. Again, the South Burlington Recreation Path Committee reviewed the sketch plans for the proposed project at its meeting on Monday March 1, 2004. 12. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Until such time as the road network and buildings are proposed, there is no need for review by the City Engineer. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Until such time as the road network and buildings are proposed, it is not possible to assess these criteria. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\sketch 3lotsubdoc No buildings are proposed at this time. This criterion will be assessed as individual buildings are proposed for each lot. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. No buildings are proposed at this time. This criterion will be assessed as individual buildings are proposed for each lot. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant should submit architectural details with the site plans for each individual lot. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant should submit architectural details with the site plans for each individual lot In addition to the above general review standards site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. At this time, Staff does not find a need for any additional access easements with the exception of an access to lot #2 as previously discussed. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans do not show any dumpsters. The site plans for the individual lots should depict proposed dumpsters, adequately screened. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\oizzagalli\sketch 31otsubdoc Landscaping Pursuant to Section 13.06(A) of the Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to site plan and PUD review. Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations requires parking facilities to be curbed and landscaped with appropriate trees, shrubs, and other plants including ground covers. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(4) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas must be shown on the plans. The plans do not snow storage areas for the subject property. However, the proposed public roadway will utilize the public right-of-way for snow storage, so additional snow storage areas are not necessary for the proposed subdivision. However, staff notes that adequate snow storage areas should be depicted on the site plans for each individual lot. Landscaping budget requirements are to be determined pursuant to Section 13.06(G)(2) of the Land Development Regulations. The landscape plan and landscape budget shall be prepared by a landscape architect or professional landscape designer. All of the proposed parking areas on the subject property should be landscaped in accordance with Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations. The site plans for each individual lot should be revised to incorporate the landscaping provisions outlined in Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations. Other 13. The preliminary plat submittal should include a property boundary survey prepared by a licensed land surveyor. Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the "Comments Section" of this document and include the changes in the preliminary plat application. Respectfully submitted, C thy n LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Robert Bouchard, contact for applicant DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOA" 20 NOVEMBER 2007 Mr. Farley moved to continue Miscellaneous Application #MS-07-12 of Munson Earth Moving Corp. until 11 December 2007. Mr. Plumeau seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. & 7. Items #6 & 7 were delayed until the arrival of a 5th Board member as one of the members present had to recuse himself from the hearing. 8. Public Hearing: Appeal #AO-07-04 of Veve Associates, LLP appealing the decision of the Administrative Officer to issue Notice of Violation #NV-07-18, 435 Dorset Street: Mr. Belair advised that the applicant has request a continuation. Members agreed to add it to the 11 December agenda. Mr. Plumeau moved to continue Appeal #AO-07-04 of Veve Associates until 11 December 2007. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 9. Sketch Plan Application #SD-07-69 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, to subdivide a 14.54 acre parcel into three lots of 1.01 acres, 5.76 acres, and 7.77 acres, Tilley Drive & Old Farm Road: Mr. Bouchard said the land is zoned Industrial -Open Space and was acquired in May, 2007 from the Tilley Estate. Staff has requested a conceptual site plan, which Mr. Bouchard said they will provide. Staff also wants a limit to the number of curb cuts, which is the reason for the shape of the subdivision that is being planned. There will be no curb cut on Old Farm Road. Mr. Bouchard said they med with the Public Works Director regarding access to the 7.7 acre site. He said the City doesn't want that to be a public road. The applicant agrees it will remain private. Utilities will come off Tilley Drive. Mr. Bouchard said the 5.76 acre site will probably be the first to be developed. Mr. Belair noted that the 1.01 acre lot is undersized, but the Board has the authority to approve it. It would have to have a very small building on it. Mr. Farley asked if the buildings will be similar to those across the street. Mr. Bouchard said they will. They are planning office buildings, even though the zoning is Industrial. A resident of Old Farm Road expressed concern that they are talking about giant office buildings in their backyards. She was concerned that neighbors just found out about this and have not had a chance to react or discuss this with their attorneys. She noted that Mr. Bouchard had promised to keep them posted, but they heard nothing until Monday night. She stressed that a parking lot 20 feet from their pool is huge in terms of property value and livability of the property. -3- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOA" 20 NOVEMBER 2007 Mr. Behr reminded residents that this is just a conceptual review and that nothing will be decided at this meeting. Residents said they had hoped to talk with Pizzagalli people before this step. Mr. Bouchard said that when they come up with a site plan, they will show them to residents. Another resident said it seems that the rules that apply to them don't apply to Pizzagalli. He noted residents were told they couldn't subdivide with a substandard lot, and for Pizzagalli this doesn't seem to be a problem. Mr. Plumeau said he lives in the area, and he understands the neighbors' frustration. Mr. Bouchard said he would be happy to submit a conceptual plan, but he doesn't want to discuss specific issues yet. Mr. Behr asked the applicant to come back with another sketch plan. A resident noted that because of South Burlington/Vermont laws, one day they woke up and the land behind them was rezoned from Residential to Commercial, and no one had to let them know it was happening. Mr. Belair stressed that he is not for or against any project; he just upholds the regulations of the city. Mr. Plumeau moved to continue Sketch Plan Application #SP-07-69 of Pizzagalli Properties until 11 December. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10. Public Hearing: Conditional Use Application #CU-07-09 of L. E. Farrell Co., Inc., to change the use of a 94,900 sq. ft. manufacturing facility to warehousing, processing, storage & distribution use, 20 Karen Drive: and 11. Site Plan Application #SP-07-83 of L. E. Farrell Co, Inc., to change the use of a 94,000 sq. ft. manufacturing building to warehousing, processing, storage & distribution use, 20 Karen Drive: Mr. Bourgeois, Plant Manager, noted that the 2 buildings are not connected. There will be no changes to the existing facility. Over the years, there have been some changes in the parking area. Before 1994, there were additions to parking areas to the north and south. There is an issue of some wetland buffers and expanded parking. 48 parking spaces are required. There are now 54. There is also a satellite dish on the roof which is 18 feet high. The building is 22 feet high for a total of 40 feet. Mr. Belair noted the limit is 35 feet without a waiver. There would have to be additional setbacks for every foot of additional height. Mr. Belair also indicated the expanded areas that did not have approvals, many of which involve wetland buffers. Mr. Bourgeois said they are here to correct that. Mr. Plumeau asked if the previous uses have been stopped. Mr. Bourgeois said they have stopped bottling. SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DECEMBER 11, 2007 9. Continued Sketch Plan Application #SD-07-69 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, to subdivide a 14.54 acre parcel into three lots of 1.01 acres, 5.76 acres, and 7.77 acres, Old Farm Road and Tilley Drive: Mr. Belair s ! staff has no problem with the 1-acre lot, and it makes sense to put a small building on it. There is a concern with access, and staff wants an access as far back from Hinesburg Rd. as possible. They are waiting for information from the traffic consultant on this. He u:»ked the Board to continue the hearing to get the consultant's input. Staff is suggesting i; access be opposite the other curb cut. Mr. Bouchard said the access was placed to be perpendicular with the access across the street. The) .'. el it is the best location. This is a private drive which the city does not want to maintain. Mr. Dinklag 'clt the Board needed the results from the traffic study before going further. Ms. Wilson (:.xpressed concern that the road is adjacent to a residential district, and 550 cars a day is lot. She asked if there is another possible site for the road and whether the developmen, "ui be moved further to the east. There are also some questions about the size of the bu 1dings. Ms. QuimbN 1 oved to continue SD-07-53 until 8 January 2008. Mr. Behr seconded. Motion passe I unanimously. 10. Con ►ed Miscellaneous Application #MS-07-12 of Munson Earth Moving Cori ,) extend the expiration date for the removal of 40,000 cubic yards of fill b. � and the October 15, 2007 deadline, 284 Meadowland Drive: Mr. Malsl)Li ; uted they had a one-year permit which expired. They are asking to keep the fill them itil they can find a place for it. He showed the location on the plan and noted they h.rc an erosion control plan. Mr. Dir)IdLi. : ;ked if the city has experienced any problems with this. Mr. Belair said it has not. 1'h�.: -uncern is that the city is involved as a co -applicant with Munson on removal of tl : ; fill. Mr. Marshal, uggested a 2-year period for removal of the fill. There were concerns with stability of f' site when the material begins to be removed, and also with dust going onto neighborin,, )perties. They feel the erosion control plan is adequate. Mr. Belair said 2 years is , i, , ; i the city. Ms. Quir>>by ,)ved to extend the expiration date for the removal of 40,000 cubic yards of fill at 284 cadowland Dr. until 11 December 2009. Mr. Behr seconded. Motion passed unau, usly. -5- C r i 4 /tD r- m m A G I rn I I I 1 I I I I I I y I I I I I I I I 1 HINESBURG ROAD x LOT 1 LAc. 1 1 PROPOSED I STORY F_un 1 3,600 sF T LOT 4 (5.76 KRE5) PROPOSED 2 STORY BUILDING 2S,IAA SF FOOTPRINT SO,M SF TOTAL A9F4r. South BuTlinwtoh4 �e,4 pH 71 1 4 - 0. i �ra - OLD FAP 0 C 1. J \•`=: / tq. e } / gA p x d I a_r LOCATION MAP r III = 20nn1 1 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I POTENTIRB-CALUT ,L ERNAT ' CU 1 � I 1 I n 1 � _ 1 I I I / 1 I \ LOT ] (7.77 KRE5) __ I PROPOSED 2 STORY BUILDING 1 29, 204 SF FOOTPRINT 5E, 40D SF TOTAL I (2 I \ I C� C� 1 iIIIl111 I � 04/ita10E5 NOTES: I. PROPERTY LINES DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING PLANS BOUNDARY PLAT 5HOWING THE 5UBDIV15ION OF LANDS OF PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLC, HINESBURG ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, DATED 01/21/02 AND LAST REVISED 02/22/02, PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.; BOUNDARY PLAT SHOWING THE SUBDIVISION OF LANDS OF TILLEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LOCATED BETWEEN COMMUNITY DRIVE AND TILLEY DRIVE, SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONTI DATED 07/29/04, PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.; SUBDIVISION PLAT, ESTATE OF RUSSELL T, TILLEY, 700 NINESBURG ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTO4, VERMONT, DATED 04/01/04, PREPARED BY BUTTON PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS, PC. 2. EXISTING FEATURES DEPICTED ON MVBP LOT A ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED MOUNTAIN VIEW BUSINESS PARK, SITE PLAN, DATED 03/OL/02 AND LAST REVISED OB/03/OS, PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 3. EXISTING FEATURES DEPICTED ON MVBP LOT B ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED MOUNTAIN VIEW BUSINESS PARK LOT B SITE DEVELOPMENT, 517E PLAN, DATED 01/I9/04 AND LAST REVI5ED 04/12/06, PREPARED BY DONALD L. 14AMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 4. WETLANDS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WERE DELINEATED BY GILMAN 4 BRIGGS ENVIRONMENTAL ON 04/2WO6. RECEIVEJ APR 18 2008 City of So. Burlington PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLC P.O. BOX 2009 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 MOUNTAIN VIEW OFFICE PARK TILLEY 3 SUBDIVISION CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN ,00,wd L h,.m in A %Y_v A-1i Jy1w Consulting Fk Engineers, Inc: k„ N 1 • DONALD L. HAMLIN �� • ��, CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Please Reply to: ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS P.O. Box 9 • • 136 Pearl Street Essex Junction Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Vermont 05453 M" March 24, 2008 Mr. Robert Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties, LLC P.O. Box 2009 South Burlington, VT 05407-2009 Re: Tilley III Subdivision Dear Mr. Bouchard: �G R� TIkhS Tel. (802) 878-3956 Fax (802) 878-2679 HamlinEngincers@dihce.net As you requested and in response to concerns expressed by the City of South Burlington, we have completed a study of the VT Route 116 and Tilley Drive intersection to evaluate the queues on Tilley Drive and confirm that they will not block the intersections along Tilley Drive assuming complete build -out of the previously approved Tilley II Subdivision and the currently proposed Tilley III Subdivision. Presented below is a summary of our work and findings. Background Tilley Drive was constructed to serve two lots in the original Tilley I Subdivision; Lot A and Lot B. Currently both Lot A and Lot B have office buildings constructed and are fully occupied. The Tilley II Subdivision completed several years ago subdivided the ±75 acre parcel of land located adjacent to the Tilley I Subdivision and Interstate 89 into five development lots. Access to this development, referred to as Mountain View Office Park, and each of the five lots is provided via an extension of Tilley Drive, which was completed during the fall of 2005. Construction was recently completed on a medical office building on Lot 4, which is now fully occupied. A medical office building is currently under construction on Lot 1 and a proposed office building on Lot 3 has been approved with construction anticipated to start during the summer of 2008. Lot 2 and Lot 5 of the Mountain View Office Park are currently vacant, although conceptual designs have been prepared for each of these lots. Pizzagalli Properties, LLC is seeking subdivision approval for the Tilley III Subdivision located north of Tilley Drive and the Mountain View Business Park to create 3 additional commercial building lots. Access to the three building lots is proposed via Tilley Drive by creating four-way intersections at the existing access drives serving Lot A and Lot B. As part of the sketch plan review of this proposed subdivision, the City of South Burlington expressed concerns that under full build -out of the Tilley II and Tilley III subdivisions queues from the VT Route 116/Tilley Drive intersection would develop along Tilley Drive that would block access to the drives along Tilley Drive. The following report addresses this concern. WATER SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION SUBDIVISIONS TRAFFIC STUDIES WASTE WATER COLLECTION AND TREATMENT SKI AREAS PERMITTING ASSISTANCE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS RECREATION AND INDUSTRIAL PLANNING LAND SURVEYING AIRPORTS SOIL BORINGS SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Engineering - "The link between what we have and what we need" Page 2 Trip Generation In order to confirm the trip generation from the three existing buildings along Tilley Drive (Lot A and B of the Tilley I subdivision and Lot 4 of the Tilley II subdivision) and trip distribution along Route 116, we performed 12-hour turning movement counts at the intersection of Route 116 and Tilley Drive on February 5-6, 2008; as well as AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts at the two existing access drives along Tilley Drive on February 13-14, 2008. Using the latest edition of ITE's Trip Generation manual, we have estimated the trip generation characteristics for the undeveloped lots and projects currently under or proposed for construction. For the undeveloped lots, we have utilized building sizes and uses based on previously prepared conceptual designs for each lot. Table 1 below presents a summary of the estimated trip generation characteristics. Table 1— Trip Generation AM PM Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Tilley II Lot 1 21 5 26 10 28 38 Medical office—10,125 sf Lot 2 82 11 93 15 74 89 General office — 60,000 sf Lot 3 41 5 46 8 37 45 General office — 29,688 sf Lot 5 78 11 89 15 71 86 General office — 57,600 sf Tilley III Lot 6 69 9 78 13 62 75 General office — 50,338 sf Lot 7 80 11 91 15 72 87 General office — 58,408 sf Lot 23 21 44 23 25 48 General office — 2,400 sf Convenience market —1,200 sf Trip Assignment The estimated trips generated for the undeveloped lots and pending projects were distributed onto the adjacent roadway based on the turning movement counts performed in February, 2008. Route 116 Traffic Based on traffic count station SOBR51 maintained by the Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO), in conjunction with appropriate growth factors obtained from the VTrans "Grouping Study and Regression Analysis", we determined the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) along this section of Route 116 to be 8,600 vehicles per day in year 2008 and 8,900 vehicles per day in year 2013. Based on these AADT values, the corresponding Design Hour Volumes (DHV) for the morning and evening peak time periods were computed to be 790 and 900 vehicles per hour respectively for year 2008 and 810 and 930 vehicles per hour for the year 2013. Using these DHV values, we calculated appropriate DHV factors to adjust the turning movement count volumes to represent DHV volumes for use in the study. DONALD L. HAMLIN Page 3 Development Scenarios Evaluated For our analysis, we have evaluated the development scenarios described below. Existing — This represents the current level of development, not including the projects on Lot 1 and Lot 3 of the Mountain View Office Park; which are currently under construction or pending. Tilley 2 Only — In addition to the existing developments, this scenario assumes the completion of development for all five lots of the Tilley II subdivision, including Lots 2 and 5 which are currently vacant and have no projects proposed at this time. Tilley 2+3 — This scenario includes the existing developments and assumes the completion of development for all five lots of the Tilley II subdivision and deve.lo me t of all three lot of the Tilley III subdivision. () IVIV = C, T7 0IU l 0 7"L �� !�-�l�K � Lane Warrant Analyses In order to evaluate the need for turning lanes along Route 116 at its intersection with Tilley Drive, appropriate lane warrant analyses were performed based on current VTrans guidelines. Presented below is a summary of the lane warrant analyses for each development scenario. Right Turn Lane Warrant Analysis Results Existing —Warrant not satisfied. Tilley 2 Only — Warrant not satisfied. Tilley 2+3 — Warrant not satisfied. Left Turn Lane Warrant Analysis Results N13 U 2 5/3 7 Existing — Warrant satisfied in the morning, but not for the evening. Tilley 2 Only — Warrant satisfied. Tilley 2+3 — Warrant satisfied. Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) contains a total of eight traffic signal warrants to evaluate the need for a traffic signal at a particular location. A traffic signal should be considered for installation if one or more of the signal warrants are met. However, the MUTCD states that satisfaction of one or more warrants does not specifically require the installation of a traffic signal. Other factors related to safety and operation of the intersection must also be considered as part of a traffic signal warrant analysis. A traffic signal warrant analysis was performed to determine if a traffic signal is appropriate at the intersection of VT Route 116 and Tilley Drive as a result of the various development scenarios. Presented below is a summary of the signal warrant analyses for each development scenario. Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Results Existing —Warrants not satisfied. Tilley 2 Only — Very close to satisfying the Peak Hour Warrant for the evening condition. Tilley 2+3 —The Peak Hour Warrant is satisfied in the evening and very close in the morning. DONALD L. HAMLIN Page 4 Capacity Analysis In order to assess the impact this project will have on the adjacent roadway network and identify the need for improvements along Tilley Drive, we performed appropriate capacity analysis computations at the Route 116/Tilley Drive intersection in accordance with the 2000 edition of the Highway Capacity Manual. For our analysis, we utilized Synchro 7 and SimTraffic 7 traffic system modeling software provided by Trafficware. As a result of the turning lane warrant analyses and traffic signal warrant analyses, it appears as though incremental improvements will be required at this intersection in order to accommodate the traffic associated with the various development scenarios. Based on our analysis, a left turn lane is currently warranted along VT Route 116 entering Tilley Drive. However, a traffic signal is not warranted at this intersection until the Tilley 2+3 development scenario. Accordingly, we performed both unsignalized and signalized capacity analysis computations. Level of Service is a measure of the operational conditions within a traffic stream and the perception by motorists and passengers. Level of service is influenced by a variety of factors, including intersection controls, intersection geometry, traffic levels, and incidents that impede traffic flow. There are six levels of service, characterized by letter designations A through F; A being the best and F being the worst. For unsignalized intersections, the measure of effectiveness used to define each level of service designation is average control delay, measured in seconds per vehicle. Similar to unsignalized intersections, the measure of effectiveness currently used to define each level of service designation for signalized intersections is also average control delay, measured in seconds per vehicle. Average control delay is defined as the total delay attributed to traffic control measures, such as stop signs or traffic signals, and includes initial deceleration delay, queue move -up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. The table below presents a summary of the level of service criteria for unsignalized and signalized intersections. In addition to the unsignalized and signalized intersection analyses, we have also modeled the VT Route 116/Tilley Drive intersection with a roundabout installed as an alternative to signalization of this intersection. The primary measure of effectiveness for roundabouts is the volume to capacity ratio for each approach. Based on current design procedures for roundabouts, it is desirable to achieve volume to capacity ratios of 0.85 or less on each approach. Table 2 below presents the results of the capacity analysis computations for the various development scenarios and improvement alternatives. In addition to the capacity analysis results, Table 3 presents the estimated 95th percentile queue lengths on the Tilley Drive approach. There is 320 feet on Tilley Drive between the edge of VT Route 116 and the first access drive serving Lot A. Therefore, queue lengths less than 320 feet will be acceptable and not spill back to the first access drive on Tilley Drive. DONALD L. HAMLIN Page 5 Table 2 AM Level of Service / Delay in seconds per vehicle PM Level of Service / Delay in seconds per vehicle or Volume to Capacity ratio as noted v/c or Volume to Capacity ratio as noted VT116/Tilley Drive Eastbound Westbound Northbound I Southbound Eastbound I Westbound Northbound Southbound Approach Approach Approach Approach Approach Approach Approach Approach 2008 Existing B 11.5 A 3.6 B 14.2 A 0.4 Tilley 2 Only with no improvements B 12.8 A 7.1 D 28.0 A 1.4 with improvements B 12.7 B 10.1 C 16.8 A 8.3 with signals B 11.5 B 10.9 A 3.5 B 11.6 A 8.1 A 3.1 with roundabouts 0.07 v/c 0.61 v/c 0.56 v/c 0.46 v/c 0.36 v/c 0.50 v/c Tilley 2+3 with no improvements B 13.9 A 9.8 F 210.2 A 2.3 with improvements B 13.6 B 11.7 C 24.4 A 1.4 with signals B 10.8 B 14.8 A 10.0 B 15.4 B 14.9 A 5.1 with roundabouts 0.12 v/c 0.72 v/c 0.69 v/c 0.65 v/c 0.38 v/c 0.55 v/c 2013 Existing B 11.6 A 3.6 B 14.4 A 0.4 Tilley 2 Only with no improvements B 12.9 A 7.1 D 29.1 A 1.4 with improvements B 12.8 B 10.2 C 17.1 A 8.3 with signals B 11.5 B 11.1 A 3.6 B 11.6 A 8.2 A 3.1 with roundabouts 0.07 v/c 0.62 v/c 0.57 v/c 0.46 v/c 0.36 v/c 0.51 v/c Tilley 2+3 with no improvements B 14.1 A 9.9 F 234.9 A 2.3 with improvements B 13.7 B 11.8 D 25.1 A 1.4 with signals B 10.8 B 14.9 A 10.0 B 16.0 B 15.0 A 5.1 with roundabouts 0.12 v/c 0.74 v/c 0.70 v/c 0.65 v/c 0.38 v/c 0.56 v/c .with improvements" = Add left turn lane on VT 116 at Tilley Drive & create left and right approach lanes on Tilley Drive at VT 116. .with signals" = Add traffic signals at VT 116/Tilley Drive, including right & left turn lanes on VT 116 and two approach lanes on Tilley Drive. .with roundabouts" = Add single lane roundabout at VT 116/rlley Drive. Page 6 Table 3 AM PM Estimated 951h Percentile Queue Length (ft) Westbound Westbound Approach Approach Left Right Left Right 2008 Existing 3 33 Tilley 2 Only with no improvements 9 172 with improvements 8 73 with signals 5 31 46 76 with roundabouts 36 78 Tilley 2+3 with no improvements 17 974 with improvements 15 169 with signals 4 42 54 135 with roundabouts 41 205 2013 Existing 3 34 Tilley 2 Only with no improvements 9 180 with improvements 8 74 with signals 5 31 45 76 with roundabouts 36 57 Tilley 2+3 with no improvements 18 1039 with improvements 15 174 with signals 4 42 54 138 with roundabouts 54 193 VTrans currently has a level of service policy that requires level of service C or better for signalized intersections and level of service D or better for side roads at unsignalized intersection approaches with volumes greater than 100 vehicles per hour for single lane approaches and 150 vehicles per hour for two lane approaches. Based on the results of the capacity analysis shown in Table 2, all approaches of the intersection operate at level of service B or better for the Existing development scenario, which is acceptable. In addition, estimated queue lengths are well less than the 320 feet available between VT Route 116 and the first access drive along Tilley Drive. Under the Tilley 2 Only development scenario, the westbound approach (Tilley Drive) operates at level of service D during the evening peak hour in 2008 and 2013 without intersection improvements with queue lengths less than 180 feet. With the construction of a left turn lane on 116 and the widening of Tilley Drive to provide separate left and right turn lanes, all approaches to the intersection operate at level of service C or better with estimated queue lengths less than 74 feet. DONALD L. HAMLIN Page 7 Under the Tilley 2+3 development scenario, the Tilley Drive approach operates at unacceptable levels of service with extremely long estimated queues during the evening peak hour in 2008 and 2013 with no improvements. With the completion of the improvements, the performance of the Tilley Drive approach improves significantly and estimated queue lengths are drastically reduced to less than 169 feet. However, this approach does operate at level of service D during the evening peak hour in the year 2013 with a delay of 25.1 seconds per vehicle. It is important to recall that a traffic signal is warranted at this intersection under the Tilley 2+3 development scenario. Based on the results of the capacity analysis, all approaches of this intersection operate at acceptable levels of service once under signal control and estimated queue lengths are less than 138 feet indicating no queue spillback problems. As an alternative to signalization of this intersection, installation of a roundabout was evaluated. The results presented in Table 2 indicated acceptable performance of the roundabout for all development scenarios with estimated queue lengths less than the available 320 feet. Conclusions The results of the turning lane warrant analyses show that a left turn lane along Route 116 is currently warranted during the morning peak hour. In addition, a left turn lane is warranted for both the Tilley 2 Only and Tilley 2+3 development scenarios. Right turn lane warrants were not satisfied under any development scenario analyzed. The results of the capacity analysis indicate that improvements will be required to Tilley Drive to accommodate the traffic associated with the Tilley 2 Only development scenario. However, this intersection will adequately function as an unsignalized intersection for the Tilley 2 Only development scenario with the widening of Tilley Drive to accommodate separate left and right turn lanes; including the left turn lane along Route 116. It is not until 2013 that the Tilley Drive approach will operate at level of service D; and we note that it is just over the threshold for level of service D with a delay of 25.1 seconds per vehicle (<25 seconds per vehicle would be level of service C). However, a signal is warranted at this intersection under the Tilley 2+3 development scenario. Once traffic signals are installed and this intersection is operating under signal control, acceptable levels of service can be achieved for the Tilley 2+3 development scenario through the design year of 2013. As an alternative to signalization, the installation of a roundabout was evaluated and found to operate acceptably for all development scenarios. Consideration for a roundabout or the installation of traffic signals is a decision that may be made later and is beyond the scope of this study. This study has shown that incremental improvements will be required at the intersection of VT Route 116 and Tilley Drive to accommodate the various development scenarios through the design year of 2013. As the left turn lane warrants are currently satisfied, the first improvement to this intersection should be the construction of a left turn lane along Route 116 entering Tilley Drive. With the completion of the Tilley II subdivision (Tilley 2 Only development scenario), improvements to the Tilley Drive approach will be required to create separate left and right turn lanes. With these improvements, the intersection will operate acceptably under unsignalized control until the design year of 2013 when the level of service will drop to D on this approach. Under the Tilley 2+3 development scenario, the installation of traffic signals will be required at this intersection in order to maintain acceptable levels of service. Construction of a DONALD L. HAMLIN Pape 8 roundabout may be considered at any time as it will perform acceptably for all development scenarios and will require less widening on each approach to this intersection. This study has shown the queues on Tilley Drive will not spill back to the existing access drive serving Lot A under all development scenarios once improvements are made to Tilley Drive to provide two approach lanes at Route 116 or a roundabout is constructed at the Route 116/Tilley Drive intersection. In summary, with the proposed improvements discussed above, based on the analysis of the operational aspects of this intersection, the estimated trips generated by the completion of the Tilley II subdivision and the proposed Tilley III subdivision can be absorbed into the adjacent roadway network without having an adverse impact on Route 116 or causing unreasonable congestion or unsafe conditions in this area. If you have any questions or would like to discuss these matters further, please do not hesitate to contact me. Respectfully, Je tsident shner, P.E. V' l DONALD L. HAMLIN PROW201-1(SihOk Sheets) 205-1(Podded) Cathyann LaRose From: Bob Bouchard [Bob.Bouchard@pizzagalliproperties.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 8:13 AM To: Cathyann LaRose Subject: RE: 3 Lot Subdivision Thank you Cathy: We should have the traffic study completed within the next 2 weeks. It has to go to RSG for a look see, so I think March 18th should be just about perfect. If possible, we would like to request a continuance for 47 Tilley Drive's 3 lot subdivision for that time. Sincerely: Bob Bouchard Robert Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 50 Joy Drive, PO Box 2009 South Burlington, VT 05407 T. 802.660.6805 F.802.660.6868 bbouchard@pizzagalliproperties.com NOTICE: Our website can now be viewed at www.pizzagalliproperties.com. From: Cathyann LaRose [mailto:clarose@sburl.com] Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 12:28 PM To: Bob Bouchard Subject: 3 Lot Subdivision Good afternoon Bob, We have the sketch plan for the 3 lot subdivision on next Tuesday's agenda. I am sure that you are still working on the traffic study so can you send me a message to officially request a continuance on this item? Would you like to recommend a date? Scheduled meetings include: March 18 April 1 April 15 May 6 Thank you in advance. -Cathy Cathyann L. LaRose Associate Planner 2/12/2008 SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DECEMBER 11, 2007 ( 9. )Continued Sketch Plan Application #SD-07-69 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, to subdivide a 14.54 acre parcel into three lots of 1.01 acres, 5.76 acres, and 7.77 acres, Old Farm Road and Tilley Drive: Mr. Belair said staff has no problem with the 1-acre lot, and it makes sense to put a small building on it. There is a concern with access, and staff wants an access as far back from Hinesburg Rd. as possible. They are waiting for information from the traffic consultant on this. He asked the Board to continue the hearing to get the consultant's input. Staff is suggesting the access be opposite the other curb cut. Mr. Bouchard said the access was placed to be perpendicular with the access across the street. They feel it is the best location. This is a private drive which the city does not want to maintain. Mr. Dinklage felt the Board needed the results from the traffic study before going further. Ms. Wilson expressed concern that the road is adjacent to a residential district, and 550 cars a day is a lot. She asked if there is another possible site for the road and whether the development can be moved further to the east. There are also some questions about the size of the buildings. Ms. Quimby moved to continue SD-07-53 until 8 January 2008. Mr. Behr seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10. Continued Miscellaneous Application #MS-07-12 of Munson Earth Moving Corp. to extend the expiration date for the removal of 40,000 cubic yards of fill beyond the October 15, 2007 deadline, 284 Meadowland Drive: Mr. Marshall noted they had a one-year permit which expired. They are asking to keep the fill there until they can find a place for it. He showed the location on the plan and noted they have an erosion control plan. Mr. Dinklage asked if the city has experienced any problems with this. Mr. Belair said it has not. The concern is that the city is involved as a co -applicant with Munson on removal of this fill. Mr. Marshall suggested a 2-year period for removal of the fill. There were concerns with stability of the site when the material begins to be removed, and also with dust going onto neighboring properties. They feel the erosion control plan is adequate. Mr. Belair said 2 years is OK with the city. Ms. Quimby moved to extend the expiration date for the removal of 40,000 cubic yards of fill at 284 Meadowland Dr. until 11 December 2009. Mr. Behr seconded. Motion passed unanimously. -5- ll DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOA.x,4 20 NOVEMBER 2007 Mr. Farley moved to continue Miscellaneous Application #MS-07-12 of Munson Earth Moving Corp. until 11 December 2007. Mr. Plumeau seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. & 7. Items #6 & 7 were delayed until the arrival of a 51h Board member as one of the members present had to recuse himself from the hearing. 8. Public Hearing: Appeal #AO-07-04 of Veve Associates, LLP appealing the decision of the Administrative Officer to issue Notice of Violation #NV-07-18, 435 Dorset Street: Mr. Belair advised that the applicant has request a continuation. Members agreed to add it to the 11 December agenda. Mr. Plumeau moved to continue Appeal #AO-07-04 of Veve Associates until 11 December 2007. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. OSketch Plan Application #SD-07-69 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, to subdivide a 14.54 acre parcel into three lots of 1.01 acres, 5.76 acres, and 7.77 acres, Tilley Drive & Old Farm Road: Mr. Bouchard said the land is zoned Industrial -Open Space and was acquired in May, 2007 from the Tilley Estate. Staff has requested a conceptual site plan, which Mr. Bouchard said they will provide. Staff also wants a limit to the number of curb cuts, which is the reason for the shape of the subdivision that is being planned. There will be no curb cut on Old Farm Road. Mr. Bouchard said they med with the Public Works Director regarding access to the 7.7 acre site. He said the City doesn't want that to be a public road. The applicant agrees it will remain private. Utilities will come off Tilley Drive. Mr. Bouchard said the 5.76 acre site will probably be the first to be developed. Mr. Belair noted that the 1.01 acre lot is undersized, but the Board has the authority to approve it. It would have to have a very small building on it. Mr. Farley asked if the buildings will be similar to those across the street. Mr. Bouchard said they will. They are planning office buildings, even though the zoning is Industrial. A resident of Old Farm Road expressed concern that they are talking about giant office buildings in their backyards. She was concerned that neighbors just found out about this and have not had a chance to react or discuss this with their attorneys. She noted that Mr. Bouchard had promised to keep them posted, but they heard nothing until Monday night. She stressed that a parking lot 20 feet from their pool is huge in terms of property value and livability of the property. -3- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOAx,� 20 NOVEMBER 2007 Mr. Behr reminded residents that this is just a conceptual review and that nothing will be decided at this meeting. Residents said they had hoped to talk with Pizzagalli people before this step. Mr. Bouchard said that when they come up with a site plan, they will show them to residents. Another resident said it seems that the rules that apply to them don't apply to Pizzagalli. He noted residents were told they couldn't subdivide with a substandard lot, and for Pizzagalli this doesn't seem to be a problem. Mr. Plumeau said he lives in the area, and he understands the neighbors' frustration. Mr. Bouchard said he would be happy to submit a conceptual plan, but he doesn't want to discuss specific issues yet. Mr. Behr asked the applicant to come back with another sketch plan. A resident noted that because of South Burlington/Vermont laws, one day they woke up and the land behind them was rezoned from Residential to Commercial, and no one had to let them know it was happening. Mr. Belair stressed that he is not for or against any project; he just upholds the regulations of the city. Mr. Plumeau moved to continue Sketch Plan Application #SP-07-69 of Pizzagalli Properties until 11 December. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10. Public Hearing: Conditional Use Application #CU-07-09 of L. E. Farrell Co., Inc., to change the use of a 94,900 sq. ft. manufacturing facility to warehousing, processing, storage & distribution use, 20 Karen Drive: and 11. Site Plan Application #SP-07-83 of L. E. Farrell Co, Inc., to change the use of a 94,000 sq. ft. manufacturing building to warehousing, processing, storage & distribution use, 20 Karen Drive: Mr. Bourgeois, Plant Manager, noted that the 2 buildings are not connected. There will be no changes to the existing facility. Over the years, there have been some changes in the parking area. Before 1994, there were additions to parking areas to the north and south. There is an issue of some wetland buffers and expanded parking. 48 parking spaces are required. There are now 54. There is also a satellite dish on the roof which is 18 feet high. The building is 22 feet high for a total of 40 feet. Mr. Belair noted the limit is 35 feet without a waiver. There would have to be additional setbacks for every foot of additional height. Mr. Belair also indicated the expanded areas that did not have approvals, many of which involve wetland buffers. Mr. Bourgeois said they are here to correct that. Mr. Plumeau asked if the previous uses have been stopped. Mr. Bourgeois said they have stopped bottling. Cathyann LaRose From: Bob Bouchard [Bob.Bouchard@pizzagaIliproperties.com] Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 10:30 AM To: Cathyann LaRose Subject: 193 Tilley Drive Final Site Plan Review & 47 Tilley Drive Sketch Subdivision Review Hi Cathy: Pizzagalli Properties would like to request a continuance for both the Sketch Subdivision Review of 47 Tilley Drive and the Final Site Plan Review of 193 Tilley Drive. Per the City's request, we are awaiting FEMA's approval of our LOMA for the 193 Tilley Drive site before the City will grant Final Site Plan Review. We anticipate FEMA's approval of the LOMA any day so we would like to request that 193 Tilley Drive be continued until the next DRB date which I believe is the 12th of February? Not sure about that date. After speaking with Juli-Beth, we are going to have additional traffic studies performed for 47 Tilley Drive before we proceed with the Sketch Subdivision Review. ? I think the traffic study may take 3 — 4 weeks. What would you recommend? Should we keep requesting a continuance for 47 Tilley Drive? Sincerely: Bob Bouchard Robert Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 50 Joy Drive, PO Box 2009 South Burlington, VT 05407 T.802.660.6805 F.802.660.6868 bbouchard@pizzagalliproperties.com NOTICE.' Our website can now be viewed at www.pizzagalliproperties.com. 1 /22/2008 Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation PUBLIC NOTICE OF APPLICATION RECEIVED FOR MOUNTAIN .VIEW OFFICE PARK VTS000081 3805-INDC.3 The Water Quality Division of the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (the Department) has received an application for a pen -nit to discharge stormwater runoff from the construction of an office building and associated infrastructure to an unnamed tributary of Potash Brook. The applicant is Pizzagalli Properties, LLC. The complete application was originally received on January 2, 2008. The project would discharge sediment and other construction -related pollutants to an unnamed tributary of Potash Brook. The Department's tentative determination is to issue an individual discharge permit with conditions to control, prevent, and mitigate impacts on water quality. Written comments will be accepted at the address below until the close of the public comment period on Monday February 11, 2008. All comments must be received by the Department no later than 4:30 p.m. on that date. A public hearing will be held if there is significant public interest. Interested persons should contact the Water Quality Division at (802) 241-3770 to either request a hearing or to be contacted in the event one is to be held. For information on the application, access to related documents, including the permit fact sheet and the draft pen -nit, or a copy of the Water Quality Standards, interested persons should contact: Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation Water Quality Division 103 South Main Street, 10 North Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 Telephone: 802-241-3 770 A copy of the draft discharge permit is available at this time. The draft permit, fact sheet, and notice will be available within the next five days at the Water,Quality Division website: littp://www.aiir.state.vt.us/dec/waterq/wqdhoi-n.e.htm. ail% Peter LaFlamme, for Laura Q. Pelosi, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation January 11, 2008 The Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation is an equal opportunity agency and offers all persons the benefits of participating in each of its programs and competing in all areas of employment regardless of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or other nonmerit factors. AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WATER QUALITY DIVISION 103 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VERMONT 05671-0408 NOTICE: DRAFT DISCHARGE PERMIT PUBLIC NOTICE NUMBER: 3-INDS PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD: January 9, 2008 — February 7, 2008 PERMITTEE INFORMATION PERMITTEE NAME: Pizzagalli Properties LLC PERMITTEE ADDRESS: 50 Joy Drive, PO Box 2009, South Burlington, VT, 05407 PERMIT NUMBER: 3805-INDS.3 PROJECT ID NUMBER: EJOI-0291 DISCHARGE INFORMATION NATURE: Treated stonnwater VOLUME: As necessary RECEIVING WATER: WATER EXPIRATION DATE: Five years from issuance date of final permit DESCRIPTION: This is a draft discharge permit proposed for issuance to for the discharge of stormwater runoff from an office building and parking areas located on Tilley Drive in South Burlington, Vermont to an unnamed tributary of Potash Brook. The means of treatment includes a wet pond. E -2- TENTATIVE DETERMINATIONS Tentative detenninations regarding effluent limitations and other conditions to be imposed on the pending Vennont permit have been made by the State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources (VANR). The limitations imposed will assure that the Vermont Water Quality Standards and applicable provisions of the Federal Clean Water Act, PL 92-500, as amended, will be met. FURTHER INFORMATION The complete application, proposed permit, and other information are on file and may be inspected at the VANR, Waterbury Office. Copies, obtained by calling (802) 241-3770, will be made at a cost based upon the current Secretary of State Official Fee Schedule for Copying Public Records from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. PUBLIC COMMENTS/PUBLIC HEARINGS Written public comments on the proposed permit are invited and must be received on or before the close of business day (7:45 am - 4:30 pm) February 7, 2008 to the Agency of Natural Resources, Department of Environmental Conservation, Water Quality Division, Building 10 North, 103 South Main Street, Waterbury, Vermont 05671-0408. Comments may also be faxed to 802-241-3287. The pen -nit number should appear next to the VANR address on the envelope and on the first page of any submitted comments. All comments received by the above date will be considered in formulation of the final determinations. During the notice period, any person may submit a written request to this office for a public hearing to consider the proposed. permit. The request must state the interest of the party filing such request and the reasons why a hearing is warranted. A hearing will be held if there is a significant public interest (including the filing of requests or petitions for such hearing) in holding such a hearing. RIGHTS TO APPEAL TO ENVIRONMENTAL COURT At the conclusion of the public notice period and after consideration of additional information received during the public notice period, the VANR will make a final determination to issue or to deny the permit. Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $225.00, payable to the state of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status; must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any pennit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, seethe Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.vemiontiudiciM.org. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. # 802-828-1660). Laura Q. Pelosi, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation Gilman & Briggs Environmental 1 Conti Circle, Suite 5 Barre, Vermont 05641 (802) 479-7480 gbenviron m ental@earthlink.net Bob Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 0540395 Subject: Tilley Farm wetlands Dear Bob, 2 May 2006 Enclosed is information regarding the wetlands on the Tilley Farm property where we delineated wetlands last week. As noted earlier, the areas identified and delineated are all Class Three wetlands not protected under the Vermont Wetland Rules. Because of their classification, these wetlands are not subject to state jurisdiction except through the water quality criteria under Act 250. They are under Corps of Engineers jurisdiction, however. At the local level, all wetlands are put in the Conservation and Open Space District, along with a 50-foot buffer zone. My copy of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations is dated 28 January 2002, but I assume the following still applies: §3.503. Encroachment into a CO District which encompasses a wetland is permitted if it will not significantly affect adversely the following attributes: (a) ability to carry or store adequately flood waters; (b) water quality by virtue of erosion or run-off; (c) the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties; (d) wetland functions and values; or (e) wildlife and fisheries habitat. In previous projects in South Burlington, such wetlands as these were shown to have none of these attributes and therefore encroachment was permitted: they are not capable of storing enough flood water to make an impact, there is no evidence of erosion or erosive forces, they do not provide significant habitat for wildlife or fisheries, and if the functions mentioned in "d" mean the 10 functions listed in the Vermont Wetland Rules, then none are performed at a significant level. This leaves "c" which could be claimed by neighbors who might prefer the open space next to their property rather than a development, even though it is not the wetland but the open field that provides the "enjoyment." Sincerely, 6 7A Errol C. Briggs ECB/s TerraServer Image Courtesy of the USGS Page I of 1 S, nr *_ Bark Tu T rraServer Change to 11x17 Print Size Show Grid Lines Change to Landscape 0' ' loom 0' ' 100y d Image courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey © 2004 Microsoft Corporation. Terms of Use Privacy Statement http://terraserver.microsoft.com/PrintImage.aspx?T=1 &S=10&Z=18&X=3233&Y=24617&... 5/1 /2006 Dnt g� . 1 u �1 Burling. I � —w" �� '-C�m-�;1 •r. 4' _ - 'l ( ��,, Ali l''\a��_-- v p ow P ,pa,1 WH R`3OW �Owz1. • \ 1 I ' ••• � Wui mill �I 1 I• .; ��11 (, i��;'r. ' ly r• i I. � � I OI { Iluniry R WZ� /4W l R201NZ POV� P®IY - l A Z Project Title: I ttE (AAA J File Number: r Tronsecl: 1 Plot: [,1t-7LAeP @ A-,? Dole: LI taPRll 100C DATA -- VEGETATIONF(DOMINANTS Stratum and Species ONLY) I Dominance Rollo Percent Dominance NWI Status �1648r: TAu►XUom p41LIsj4e 20 SC100i A1,11OJto4tis 3D ,r P�tENats OL 30 FAW Ca. FACW: FAC: l FACU: VPL: minan s SUM: 100 x Dominont(08L+FACW+FAC)/Tally Sum FO 0 Describe Vegetation Disturbance: QWFJ FIELD Describe Problem Vegetation: DATA -- SOIL Soil Taxonomy: Corps oI Engineers Re tonal Oramo a Gloss; Criterion: Is Published Soil Survey Available? Yes 0 No Q rlle/Dale: Soil Survey of Chittenden Soil Type Mapped: COJ►eSq-IQN SILT CLA County, 1974 Depth Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell, Moist) Color of Moines Munsell, Moist) USDA Texture, Iron or manganese nodules or concretions, restrictive hundonce/Conlrosl foxers, root distribution, oxidized rhizospheres, etc. 0-c AP Ipt�Q ,� l� htbblE 51lt LOAM RAMn.F�►, 6-9 AL ldjlt 2It 0 7•sr2 v-4 s►1 t t,oh/+ MRuy, ;AIR 11 4/3 11r 4/4 f-NF fAJ&1W,1 A SMRW. D47T1A)0r IaY'Ls1C unylor+M Remarks: Skel'eh Londseape Position: f UPt. I. 9C' k ee t. I.s..ky I. e.H.ne. "I " 6.8 I. fear hm;A a SOIL DETERMINATION NOTE: X TM' N .tIs W+ cv'.. I.Ys y Ho , ;nrvj �� r'f l�"d"_1 J. t1J. W.rpr.ave Hulk. msy ►. ►.ppnprint. In wwsud s.w.. No ® M dominant plants are OBLIGATE. ®� AX dominant plants art FACULTATNE WET AND OBLIGATE and the topographic boundary Is abrupt. Soil Is frequently PONDED or FLOODED for a duratlon longer than two weeks during the growing season. (attach an explanation of the boils for your conclusions), ® The toll motto the Corps of Engineers regional criteria of a VERY POORLY DRAINED SOIL' and there is no evidence of altered hydrology. ®r7 The toll meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as a POORLY DRAINED SOIL' and there Is no evidence of altered hydrology. The soil mists the Corps of Engineers regional criteria at a SOMEWHAT POORLY DRAINED SOIL that hot either of the following two characteristics': Yes NO 0 1. Within B Inches of the soil surface there are: Yes No a, soil mottles within on A or Ap horizon and the subsoil is mottled throughout: OR b. common to many, distinct or prominent moults with a matrix of chromo 3 or lees; OR c, distinct or prominent oxidized rhizospheres and the subsoil Is mottled throughout. ❑ 2. Within 24 inches of the toil surface, there are mottles which are common to many, distinct or prominent, and that are chroma 2 or less, and one of the following: Yet No a. In the horizon that ties within 10 Inches of the soil surface and directly beneath a dark" A or Ap horizon. the matrix is chromo 3 or less, the mottles are at least 10X In obundancn and distinct or promintnt. ❑ b. When a dork'Ap horizon is between 10 and 14 inches thick, wNntss morphology may be masked by organic matter, Normally, these problem situotiono will be considered hydrk when: L hydrophytes are prevalent, A. there is no evddonct of altered hydrology, and Al. in the horizon that lies directly beneath the Ap horizon, the matrix color is chromo 3 or less and mottles are at least 10% in abundance and distinct or prominent. Chick here and attach o descripllon of your procedures and concluslons If one of the following options wire chosen for your hydric soil determination: measured redox potentials, colormelric last for ferrous Iron test (•r,e•,—DipyridiQ, or other measurtments and observations. • Typically In Now England, soils having these morphologits will be classified In on oquic suborder or on aquic subgroup In soil taxonomy. to Note: a dark A or Ap is dtfined a$ having a value of 3 or less Remarks: 1. Nydr.t.ty Is .rten IM mt.t Ilr.urt 4.4w4 1. •►—.. DATA k 1. W.rp.4a•ne must «nr.« w .w.prt.—..r V. NOTE: OETERMIl1ATI0N Petit of tl..«tin, —I..it. , HYDROLOGY J. W orpr.t.4.n .f lydr.bey m.y r.q k. r.p.•t.d •►.«»uent ...r m«a VM Me "..on. ❑ Recorded Data; Strsom, lake or tidol gage Identification: Aerial Photograph Identification: Other Identification: ❑ No Recorded Data Available REPORT ANY OF THE FOLLOWING OBSERVATIONS: Dtplh to Free Water, 16 Depth to Saturation:" Describe Allersd Hydrology: 144or, ❑ Inundated C5J Saturated in upper 121n. ❑ Water Works ❑ Oxidised Rhizospheres ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Water Stained Leaves ❑ Water —borne Sediment ❑ Surface Scoured Areas ®Welland Drainage Patterns Deposits ❑ No Evidence of Significant Hydrological Modification AND there it on• or more Morphological Plant Adoplation SUCH AS: ❑ Pnoumolophores ❑ Buttressed Trees ❑ Ftyptrtrophitd Lentictls ❑ Stooling ❑Adventitious Roots ❑ Infloltd Leaves, Sttms, or Roots ❑ Shallow Root Systems ❑ Floating Leaves ❑ Aerenchymo in Roots k stems ❑ Polymorphic Leaves ❑ Hydric Soils and NO visible evidence of significont hydrological modification Remarks: CONCLUSIONS Project Title: "' v, /h' � (`e oelineatar E.C. Briggs & A.V. Gilman Tronsect: ) Plot: LJCT', `pA_3 Dole: Q� Yes No Hydrophytic Vegetation Criterion Met? V CD Hydric Soils Criterion Met? .� ❑ Yes No Welland Hydrology, Criterion Met? ❑ IS THIS DATAPOINT WITHIN A WETLAND? ® ❑ Remarks; Project Title: 7m V Pow (V File Number: Transecl: i Plot: (1P(,AO 19 A 3 Dole: 26 AW 2006 DATA -- VEGETATION Stratum and Species (DOMINANTS ONLY) I Dom' Rati PercentPercent Dominance NWI Status TRE,c;. uw'- — SNUO3: McgL< _ _ HERBS: KA VXA-j f,,S jU AActe%V �4A f tATk Tr1RAXACJM OFrtc,e3AlF %o 10 to 7A RqM w,h Tally (Dominonls ONLY): OBL: FACW: FAG: FACU: UPL: SUM: 100 x Oominont(OBL+FACW+FAC)/Tally Sum Describe Vegetation Disturbance: n/I�W 3 FifIg /�` Describe Problem Vegetation: DATA -- SOIL Soil Taxonomy: CorPa of Enyinears Re ,onol Oraino a Class: Criterion; Is Published Soil Survey Awiloblel Yes ® No ❑ Title/Dale: Soil Survey of Chittenden Soil Type Mopped: Vey 4,,1(S CIn County, 1974 Depth Horizon Matrix Color (Munsell, Moist) alor of Mottles rAlunsell, Moist) USDA Texture, iron or manganese nodules or concretions, restrictive Abundance/Conlrost layers, root distribution, oxidixed rhospheres, ate. u AP 1pr�, 3/L Nods S, It LpAft AZ y ua`I St tt wim Ay CQ Al M/eJ DISC t�ta Remarks: Sketch Landscape Position: 1 I. 9ra• h .e W. 100-4 to a W-4 0•1 W e.e 1. Her tMWtq SOIL DETERMINATION NOTE: i 1N. ef.eul.I t..4 fw Us.►y IM Nw tnet.M Grp rl tnq n..nt w,IW. N. re W.w Gy44 31.I.s T•y be kappr.prlel.. 1 Me hlapr.a.e nulhe Tay be k appnprtete In unu.ual M dominant plants are OBLIGATE. - Aft dominant plants are FACULTATIVE WET AND OBLIGATE and the topographic boundary Is abrupt. Soil is frequently PONDED or FLOODED for c duration longer then two weeks during the growing season. (attach on explanation of the basis for your conclusions). ® The soil meets the Corps of Enginsers regional criteria as a VERY POORLY DRAINED SOIL' and there is ns evidence of attend hydrology. ®The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regioncl criteria as a POORLY DRAINED SOIL and there is no evidence of altered hydrology. ®The soil meets the Corps of Engineers regional criteria as o SOMEWHAT POORLY DRAINED SOIL that has either of the following two fchhantracteristics*: Yet NO ❑ lJ 1. Within 8 Inches of the soil surface then ore; Yes No 2)o. ansoil mottles wl:hin on A or Ap horizon d the subsoil is mottled throughout; OR ❑ ® b. common to many, distinct or prominent mottles with a matrix of chrome 3 or less; OR ®e. distinct or prominent oxidized rhizospheres and the subsoil Is mottled throughout. ® 2. Within 24 inches of the soil surface, there are mottles which ore common to many, distinct or prominent, and that are chrome 2 or less, and one of the following: Yes No 13 ®o, In the horizon that Gee within 10 Inches of the soil surface and directly beneath a dark" A or Ap horizon, the matrix is chrome 3 or less: the mottles are of least IOX in abundance end distinct or prominent. ® b. When a dark'Ap horizon Is between 10 and 14 inches thick, wetness morphology may be masked by organic matter. Normally, these problem situations will be considered hydric when: I, hydrophytes are prevalent, G. there is no evidence of altered hydrology, and Gi, in the horizon that lies directly beneath the Ap horizon the matrix color is chrome 3 or less and mottles on at least 10X In abundance and distinct or prominent. o Cheek here and attach o description of your procedures and conclusions 4 one of the following options were chosen for your hydric sell determination: measured redox potentials, colormetric tut for ferrous Iron test (`,a,-0ipyrldiQ, or other measurements and observations. • Typically in New England, soils having these morphologies will be classified In an oquic suborder or on aquic subgroup In soil taxonomy. e. Note: a dark A or Ap is defined as having o value of 3 or less Remarks: I. Hr&.4ey is elt.n the m t 4111-41 4.1.4 1. •►—.. DATA & 2, W#,s.r.l.a.n. Tut wn.te0 IM epp.pA.i— .f u.. NOTE: .►NnN+�. h DETERMINATION sent •r IIv .Nwn, NMI ...In.r .ww�., «.I ..I.rJ.W HYDROLOGY 3, w«pr.t.aen rf lydr.bgy Tey roq ks r.pN1.e •►..nwwns e..r rn•I. IMn MI N..•n. ❑ Recorded Data; Stream, take or tidoi gage Identification: Aerial Photograph Identificatlon; Other Identification: ❑ No Recorded Data Available REPORT ANY OF THE FOLLOWING OBSERVATIONS: Depth to Free Water, Depth to Saturation: 7j$ Describe Ntered Hydrology: NO�� ❑ Inundated ❑ Saturated in upper 12in. ❑ Water Narks ❑ Oxidized Rhizospheres ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Water Stained leaves ❑ Water —borne Sediment ❑ S-rfoee Scoured Areas [__)Wetland Drainage Potterns Deposits ❑ No Evidence of Significant Hydrological Modification AND there is one or more Morphological Plant Adoptation SUCH AS: ❑ Pneumotophores ❑ Buttressed Trees ❑ Hypertrophied Lenticels ❑ Stooling ❑ Adventitious Roots ❑ Imitated Leavess, Stems, or Roots ❑ Shallow Root Systems ❑ Floating Leaves ❑ Aerenchymo in Roots & stems ❑ Polymorphic Leaves ❑ Hydric Soils and NO visible evidence of significant hydrologicol modiflcotlon Remarks: CONCLUSIONS Project mle: 71LLg:7 lU --- 06ritotor, E.C.-Briggs & A.V. Gilman Tronsect: f Plot; UPL, 9 Iq—� Dole, 2E APft 06 Yes No Hydrophytie Vegetation Criterion Met? Cl Hydrie Soils Criterion Met? ❑ © Yes No Wetland Hydrology, Criterion Met? ❑ ® IS THIS DATAPOINi WITHIN A WETLANO? ❑ 2 Remarks: CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: December 4, 2007 \drb\sub\pizzagalli\sketch_3lotsub2.doc Application received: October 24, 2007 PIZZAGALLI — 3- LOT SUBDIVISION 47 Tilley Drive SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-07-69 Agenda #9 Meeting Date: December 11, 2007 Owner/Applicant Contact Pizzagalli Properties, LLC Robert Bouchard 50 Joy Drive Pizzagalli Properties, LLC S. Burlington, VT 05403 50 Joy Drive S. Burlington, VT 05403 Engineer Property Information Donald Hamlin Consulting Engineers, Inc. Tax Parcel 1718-00047 136 Pearl Street 14.54 acres Essex Junction, VT Industrial Open Space Zonina District Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\sketch 31otsubdoc Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting sketch plan review of a planned unit development to subdivide a 14.54 acre parcel into three (3) lots of 1.01 acres, 5.76 acres, and 7.77 acres. The project was reviewed on November 20, 2007 (minutes not yet available) and was continued to December 11, 2007 so that the applicant could provide a conceptual sketch of the layout of the buildings on the proposed lots. The applicant has provided this sketch (attached) and the staff comments have been revised in response to this. Associate Planner Cathyann La Rose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on October 24, 2007 and November 27, 2007 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements Lots #1-3 10 Zoning District Re uired Proposed �• Min. Lot Size 3 acres 1.01 acres Max. Building Coverage 30% n/a Max. Overall Coverage 50% n/a Min. Front Setback 50 ft. n/a Min. Side Setback 35 ft. n/a Min. Rear Setback 50 ft. n/a zoning compliance + waiver requested pursuant to Article 15 of the SBLDR, PUDs The minimum lot size in the Industrial/Open Space District is 3 acres. The applicant is proposing one lot which does not meet this minimum. Minimum lot size requirements may be modified by the Board pursuant to a Planned Unit Development, or PUD. The Board should discuss this issue and render guidance. 1. The Board should discuss the requested lot size modification and render guidance. If the Board permits the reduction in lot size, all further applications must be processed as a PUD. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\nizzagalli\sketch 3lotsubdoc According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. 2. The City of South Burlington Water Department shall review the plans for the subject project, prior to preliminary plat approval. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. 3. The plans should be revised to show the location of all proposed sewer lines, prior to submittal of the preliminary plat plans. 4. The applicant shall obtain preliminary wastewater allocation prior to approval of the final plat. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. 5. The applicant shall submit grading and erosion control plans as part of the preliminary application. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. The applicant has submitted a conceptual site plan which estimates how the buildings and related drives and parking areas will be organized. The applicant is proposing two curb cuts from Tilley Drive, both aligned with existing curb cuts to the south. The applicant is proposing that both curb cuts service all three buildings. Staff is concerned that the western most curb cut is too close to the Tilley Drive/Hinesburg Road intersection and cannot handle the queuing of vehicles that the additional buildings will create and the connection of Tilley Drive to the interstate via the proposed ramp. Staff recommends that the Board permit this curb cut to serve only the smallest building on Lot 1. It should not be accessible to the other lots. 6. Access to the western, 1.01 acre lot shall be permitted across from the existing curb cut to the south which currently serves 62 Tilley Drive. This access shall not serve any other lots. The second proposed curb cut is to the east, and also aligned with an existing curb cut to the south. It is sited appropriately. However, the access here would best be constructed in a more linear fashion so as best to access the rear lot without undue traffic through the parking areas closest to the building. 7. The access to proposed "Lots 6 and 7" shall be across from the existing curbcut on Tilley Drive which serves 118 Tilley Drive. It shall be designed in a manner which safely and efficiently serves CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\sketch 31otsubdoc both lots. This shall be reviewed carefully at such time as the application seeks site plan review for buildings on said lots. Staff strongly urges the Board to limit access to the lots to Tilley Drive only. No access shall be permitted via Old Farm Road. This road is wholly residential and is not built to accommodate office or industrial uses. Access to the driveway accessing lots 6 and 7 should also provide access to the adjacent lot #2. 8. Access to the proposed lots shall be via Tilley Drive. No access shall be permitted via Old Farm Road. Under the terms of an existing 5-lot subdivision of lands access via Tilley Drive, the applicant is required to submit a trip generation and traffic analysis including turning movement analysis to be submitted as part of the review of the fourth building. Staff recommends that this condition be carried through to include this subdivision, should any of the lots proposed herein be developed prior to the existing lots. 9. A trip generation and traffic analysis, including turning movement analysis, shall be prepared and submitted prior to final plat approval for any building proposed as part of this subdivision. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The plans that the applicant submitted depict Class III wetlands on the subject property. These wetlands extend into the area where the access to the lots will likely be located. The plans should be revised to depict the wetlands and their associated 50 foot buffers. 10. The conceptual plans shall be revised to include a full wetland delineation, including appropriate 50 foot wetland buffer zones. Staff will further assess impacts to wetlands as the access drives and buildings are proposed. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Staff feels that the proposed project is in keeping with the planned development patterns of the 10 Zoning District. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. As previously stated, the applicant will likely need to revise the conceptual layout of the proposed buildings. Staff will assess this criterion at such time as more detail is provided. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. Until such time as the road network and buildings are proposed, there is no need for review by the Fire Department. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\sketch 31otsubdoc Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee has not yet reviewed the plans. 11. The Recreation Path Committee shall review the plans and if warranted, provide comments prior to final plat approval. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. Again, the South Burlington Recreation Path Committee reviewed the sketch plans for the proposed project at its meeting on Monday March 1, 2004. 12. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Until such time as the road network and buildings are proposed, there is no need for review by the City Engineer. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Until such time as the road network and buildings are proposed, it is not possible to assess these criteria. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. No buildings are proposed at this time. This criterion will be assessed as individual buildings are proposed for each lot. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. No buildings are proposed at this time. This criterion will be assessed as individual buildings are proposed for each lot. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\sketch 3lotsubdoc Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant should submit architectural details with the site plans for each individual lot. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant should submit architectural details with the site plans for each individual lot In addition to the above general review standards site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. At this time, Staff does not find a need for any additional access easements with the exception of an access to lot #2 as previously discussed. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans do not show any dumpsters. The site plans for the individual lots should depict proposed dumpsters, adequately screened. Landscaping Pursuant to Section 13.06(A) of the Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to site plan and PUD review. Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations requires parking facilities to be curbed and landscaped with appropriate trees, shrubs, and other plants including ground covers. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\sketch 31otsubdoc Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(4) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas must be shown on the plans. The plans do not snow storage areas for the subject property. However, the proposed public roadway will utilize the public right-of-way for snow storage, so additional snow storage areas are not necessary for the proposed subdivision. However, staff notes that adequate snow storage areas should be depicted on the site plans for each individual lot. Landscaping budget requirements are to be determined pursuant to Section 13.06(G)(2) of the Land Development Regulations. The landscape plan and landscape budget shall be prepared by a landscape architect or professional landscape designer. All of the proposed parking areas on the subject property should be landscaped in accordance with Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations. The site plans for each individual lot should be revised to incorporate the landscaping provisions outlined in Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations. Other 13. The preliminary plat submittal should include a property boundary survey prepared by a licensed land surveyor. Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the "Comments Section" of this document and include the changes in the preliminary plat application. Respectfully submitted, Cathyanr�"LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Robert Bouchard, contact for applicant VT ROUTE 116 a Lu W _i —I MVBP AL A IZZ PAGALLI PROPERTIES MVBP LOT B PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES N/F w f-i IT i 1 2jj 1La � ' �! OL cl i 1 1 I_ I I Dot I .a I Pp1�1 1 1L6 1 1 6ARBARA 1 DAVID NEFF I N/F 1� 1 -`• / , I - J 1 --*12 I 1 1 � e e � !j 1 I I 1 I 1 1 LOT I 5.76 AC I 1 1 I i 1 1 I I 1 � I I 1 i O I I I 1 1 I I I 1 1 00 I 1 1« use I 2WAT 1 TO CHAMPLAI I I I 1 I 1 � I MVOP LOT 4 I I 2 —C PIZZAGAPROPERTIES N/F LLI i I I PIZZAGALLI PROPERT195 I I I ` \ N/F z J \ Oi P •50 P\ IOU -I II I ________—__—__—__ I I \ I \ J, D FqR I n t n�j, JC C 4 Nt yr � .>y Ya z LORA WIL50N / ♦I w/ \ f F` �.i i "•`.`.: BRIAN ARMSTRONG LOCATION MAP N/F I11 = 2"' n r IN I I I I 1 DOUGLAS DICKEY N/F wl LDT I 7.77 AC 1 I I I I i MVOP LOT 2 PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES N/F NOTE I. PROPERTY LINES DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING PLANS: BOUNDARY PLAT SHOWING T14E SUBDIVISION OF LANDS OF PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLC, 14INE581JRG ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, DATED 01/21/02 AND LAST REVI5ED 02/22/02, PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC., BOUNDARY PLAT SHOWING THE SUBDIVISION OF LANDS OF TILLEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LOCATED BETWEEN COMMUNITY DRIVE AND TILLEY DRIVE, SOUTH BJRLINGTON, VERMONT, DATED 07/2q/04, PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC., SUBDIVISION PLAT, ESTATE OF RU55ELL T. TILLEY, 700 14INESBURG ROAD, S JTN BURLINGTON, VERMONT, DATED 04/01/04, PREPARED BY BUTTON PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS, PC 2. EXISTING FEATURES DEPICTED ON MVBP LOT A ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED MOUNTAIN VIEW BUSINESS PARK, SITE PLAN, DATED 03/06/02 AND LAST REVISED 08/03/05, PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 5. EXISTING FEATURES DEPICTED ON MVBP LOT B ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED MOUNTAIN VIEW BUSINESS PARK LOT B SITE DEVELOPMENT, 517E PLAN, DATED 01/Iq/04 AND LAST REVISED 04/12/06, PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 4. WETLANDS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WERE DELINEATED BY GILMAN / BRIGGS ENVIRONMENTAL ON 04/26/0L. DANIEL O'BRIEN N/F RECEIVED OCT 2 4 2007 City of So. Burlington PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, ILL P.O. BOX 2009 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 TITLE MOUNTAIN VIEW OFFICE PARK TILLEY 3 SUBDIVISION TITLE SUBDIVISION PLAN - SKETCH kole pN Gbnald L handin ,b JPK Consulting h Engineers, Inc. JPK t96 Bart Street 0122,07 E tez ✓ tfon„ Vermont MOM 1 / � a i --1: 'J- t.- ..... . .._ � I� i low- m ad Mae NINESBURG ROAD CJ LOT 1.01 A- i PROPOSED 1 STORY � I BUILDING , 9,600 1° I ' 1 � � I � 1 � ff oLD � . FAkr-r Ro nn - AD C � i I I 1 LOT i (5.76 ACRES) PROP05ED 2 STORY BUILDING _ 1 _ 26, K9 SF FOOTPRINT 1 50,3SB 5F TOTAL I =_ _ 1 I _ 1 1 I I 1 I / I 1 1 i 1 1 I 1 1 I � 1 1 I I I1 I I 1 I I 1 � 1 0 li _ r' y p - L � 1 � OCATION MAP 10 • 20001 1. PROPERTY LINES DEPICTED ON THIS PLAN ARE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING PLANS, BOUNDARY PLAT SHOWING THE SUBDIVISION OF +\+ 1 \+_ LANDS OF PIUAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLC, HINESBURG ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, DATED 01/21/02 AND LAST REVISED 02/22/02, \+ \ PREPARED BY DOSHOWING L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.; BOUNDARY PLAT SHONING THE 5UBDIV15ION OF LANDS OF TILLEY FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LOCATED BETWEEN COMMUNITY DRIVE AND TILLEY DRIVE, 50VTN BURLINGTON, VERMONT, DATED 07/29/04, PREPARED By 1 DONALL. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.; SUBDIVISION PLAT, ESTATED OF RUSSELL T. TILLEY, 700 NINESBURG ROAD, SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT, DATED 04/01/04, PREPARED BY BUTTON PRO°E55IONAL LAND SURVEYORS, PC. 1 2. EXISTING FEATURES DEPICTED ON MVBP LOT A ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED MOUNTAIN VIEW BUSINESS PARK, 51TE PLAN, DATED 03/04/02 AND LAST REVISED OB/03/05, PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 1 3. EXISTING FEATURES DEPICTED ON MVBP LDT 8 ARE BASED ON A PLAN ENTITLED MOUNTAIN VIEW BUSINESS PARK LOT B SITE - , DEVELOPMENT, SITE PLAN, DATED 01/19/04 AND LAST REVI5ED 04/12/OL, PREPARED BY DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 4. WETLANDS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WERE DELINEATED BY GILMAN 4 ERIGGS ENVIRONMENTAL ON 04/26/06. LOT 7 (7.77 ACRES) I_ PROPOSED 2 STORY BUILDING 29,204 5F FOOTPRINT- 1 _ SB,405 SF TOTAL - j - 1 1 i RECEIVED —r- -'- City of So. Burlington CD 0 0- HI PREL I1" 1I NARY 11/26/07 DATE lum IY a" PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLC i P.O. BOX 2009 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 i PR➢,[CT TITLE MOUNTAIN VIEW OFFICE PARK TILLEY 3 SUBDIVISION CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 December 6, 2007 Bob Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Tilley Subdivision Dear Mr. Bouchard: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday December 11, 2007 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, e)& Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. DONALD L. HAMLIN CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Please Reply to: ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS Tel. (802) 878-3956 P.O. Box 9 136 Pearl Street Fax (802) 878-2679 Essex Junction Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 HamlinEngineers@dlhce.net Vermont 05453 December 11, 2007 Mr. Robert Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties, LLC P.O. Box 2009 South Burlington, Vermont 05407 Re: Tilley 3 Subdivision Dear Mr. Bouchard: In response to your inquiries regarding the location of the westemmost access drive serving Lots 6, 7, and 8 of the Tilley 3 subdivision, we have reviewed the City of South Burlington Land Development Regulations effective October 24, 2006. Based on our review of the regulations, we offer the following comments: Article 15.12.0 of the regulations states that "streets shall be logically related to the topography so as to produce usable lots, reasonable grades, and safe intersections in appropriate relation to the proposed use of the land to be served by such streets." The location of the westernmost access drive was located to align with the existing access drive serving 62 Tilley Drive, thereby creating a four-way intersection and eliminating the need for an additional intersection along Tilley Drive. The access drive serving 62 Tilley Drive was located in accordance with this section of the Land Development Regulations in consideration of the vertical alignment of Tilley Drive to provide safe access with adequate sight distance and separation from Route 116. 2. Article 15.12.F(2) relates to "Entrances" and states that "...entrances to PUDs and subdivisions may be allowed on opposite sides of a public street if substantially aligned with each other." As the proposed access drives serving the Tilley 3 property are aligned with the existing drives along Tilley Drive, we believe that their location is in conformance with this section of the regulations. Article 15.12.F(3) also relates to "Entrances" and states that "Signalized entrances to PUDs and subdivisions shall be separated from signalized intersections (measured between the near edges of the driveway and intersection)..." a distance of 300 feet for projected peak hour volumes below 450 vehicles per hour for the PUD (taken from Table 15-2). Although neither the existing Tilley Drive/Route 116 intersection nor the Tilley Drive/Project Access Drive intersections are signalized, the distance between these intersections is 300 feet and is therefore in conformance with the regulations should these intersections be signalized in the future. 4. Article 15.12.F(4) presents several considerations for the location and design of project access drives to provide "improved access management and traffic safety." These items are presented below in italics followed by a brief discussion regarding each item as it relates to this project. (a) Maximize the use of secondary streets for access and circulation The proposed drive serves as a secondary street for access to the PUD from Tilley Drive and provides access to the individual PUD lots via internal circulation within the PUD. (b) Align access points with existing intersections and/or curb cuts The proposed drive is located to align with the existing intersections/curb cuts along Tilley Drive. WATER SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION SUBDIVISIONS TRAFFIC STUDIES WASTE WATER COLLECTION AND TREATMENT SKI AREAS PERMITTING ASSISTANCE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS RECREATION AND INDUSTRIAL PLANNING LAND SURVEYING AIRPORTS SOIL BORINGS SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Engineering - "The link between what we have and what we need" Page 2 (c) Consolidate existing curb cuts within the PUD property By serving all three lots of this subdivision with the two proposed curb cuts, one potential curb cut along Tilley Drive has been eliminated; thereby achieving the goal of consolidation of curb cuts. In addition, alignment of the proposed drive with the existing access drive eliminates the need for an additional curb cut(s) along Tilley Drive beyond the two existing curb cuts. We believe that maintaining two access points to this PUD is an important safety consideration for emergency vehicle access. (d) Provide for safe access to abutting properties In addition to providing access to all three lots of this subdivision, the two proposed drives create four-way intersections that also provide safe access to the existing properties on the south side of Tilley Drive. (e) Make provisions for safe access, with provisions for appropriate sight distances and accommodations for high -accident locations The proposed access drives are located in alignment with the existing drives along Tilley Drive, which were located in consideration of the Tilley Drive roadway profile to provide adequate sight distance. (fl Provide deceleration, acceleration and/or turn stacking lanes as appropriate to meet the standards in (1) above Detailed intersection capacity analyses will be performed during the site plan review for the proposed lot developments. Adequate deceleration, acceleration, and/or turn stacking lanes will be provided, if necessary, in order to achieve an overall level of service "D" or better at the peak street hour as required by the regulations. (g) Provide adequate curb radii to accommodate the anticipate speeds and types of vehicles The proposed access drives are provided with 30 foot curb radii which are typical of a commercial access drive and match the curb radii on the existing access drives along Tilley Drive. In summary, we believe the proposed drive location has been designed in conformance with the current Land Development Regulations to provide safe and efficient access to the proposed PUD and are consistent with the existing access points along Tilley Drive. If you have any questions or would like additional assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Re pectfully, Je fK rshner, P.E. Ucde t DONALD L. HAMLIN City of South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Attn: Betsy McDonough November 15, 2007 Dear Betsy, e R11 con RFC F/ V� C; *OP'1g 2C� O Hof so ev�Iin9ton Thank you for the recent notification of the proposal regarding a parcel that abuts my property. I refer specifically to item 10 of the 11/20/2007 agenda. I am deeply concerned about the continued expansion of this industrial/commercial complex and the subsequent impact on the residential neighborhood which borders it. The traffic flow and congestion have appreciably changed, the noise and light pollution have increased, and the wildlife has been impacted in what appears to be the early stages of a development that appears to have no bounds or constraints beyond the strict letter of the regulations. I reserve all my rights under title 24 of the State law even if my business prevents me from attending the aforementioned meeting. Sincerely, Douglas Dickey 80 Old Farm Road CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: November 15, 2007 \drb\sub\pizzagaIIi\sketch_phase3_3lots ub.doc Application received: October 24, 2007 PIZZAGALLI — 3- LOT SUBDIVISION 47 Tilley Drive SKETCH PLAN APPLICATION #SD-07-69 Agenda #9 Meeting Date: November 20, 2007 Owner/Applicant Contact Pizzagalli Properties, LLC Robert BouchA 50 Joy Drive Pizzagalli Pro, LLC S. Burlington, VT 05403 50 Joy Drive S. Burlington, VT 05403 Engineer Property Information Donald Hamlin Consulting Engineers, Inc. Tax Parcel 1718-00047 136 Pearl Street 14.54 acres Essex Junction. VT Industrial OlDen Sr)ace Zonina District Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\sketch phase3 3lotsubdoc Pizzagalli Properties, LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting sketch plan review of a planned unit development to subdivide a 14.54 acre parcel into three (3) lots of 1.01 acres, 5.76 acres, and 7.77 acres. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on October 24, 2007 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Requirements Lots #1-3 10 Zoning District Re uired Proposed 4 Min. Lot Size 3 acres 1.01 acres Max. Building Coverage 30% n/a Max. Overall Coverage 50% n/a Min. Front Setback 50 ft. n/a Min. Side Setback 1 35 ft. n/a Min. Rear Setback L 50 ft. n/a zoning compliance waiver requested pursuant to Article 15 of the SBLDR, PUDs The minimum lot size in the Industrial/Open Space District is 3 acres. The applicant is proposing one lot which does not meet this minimum. Minimum lot size requirements may be modified by the Board pursuant to a Planned Unit Development, or PUD. The Board should discuss this issue and render guidance. 1. The Board should discuss the requested lot size modification and render guidance. If the Board permits the reduction in lot size, all further applications must be processed as a PUD. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, subdivisions shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system shall be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. 2. The City of South Burlington Water Department shall review the plans for the subject project, prior to preliminary plat approval. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\sketch phase3 3lotsubdoc According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. 3. The plans should be revised to show the location of all proposed sewer lines, prior to submittal of the final plat plans. 4. The applicant shall obtain preliminary wastewater allocation prior to approval of the final plat. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. 5. The applicant shall submit grading and erosion control plans as part of the preliminary application. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. It is not clear at this time where the applicant is proposing to provide access to the lots. Staff strongly urges the Board to limit access to the lots to Tilley Drive only. No access shall be permitted via Old Farm Road. This road is wholly residential and is not built to accommodate office or industrial uses. Staff also recommends that access to all three lots be via one access to Tilley Drive and hat access be opposite the shared access to 62 and 118 Tilley Drive. The applicant is working to prepare conceptual site plans which would help the Board to understand how the buildings will be planned. 6. Access to the proposed lots shall be via Tilley Drive. No access shall be permitted via Old Farm Road. Under the terms of an existing 5-lot subdivision of lands access via Tilley Drive, the applicant is required to submit a trip generation and traffic analysis including turning movement analysis to be submitted as part of the review of the fourth building. Staff recommends that this condition be carried through to include this subdivision, should any of the lots proposed herein be developed prior to the existing lots. 7. A trip generation and traffic analysis, including turning movement analysis, shall be prepared and submitted prior to final plat approval for any building proposed as part of this subdivision. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The plans that the applicant submitted depict Class III wetlands on the subject property. These wetlands extend into the area where the access to the lots will likely be located. The plans should be revised to depict the wetlands and their associated 50 foot buffers. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\sketch phase3 31otsubdoc 8. The plans shall be revised to include a full wetland delineation, including appropriate 50 foot wetland buffer zones. Staff will further assess impacts to wetlands as the access drives and buildings are proposed. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Staff feels that the proposed project is in keeping with the planned development patterns of the 10 Zoning District. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. At this time, no development is proposed and so it is not possible to assess this criterion at this time. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. Until such time as the road network and buildings are proposed, there is no need for review by the Fire Department. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. The South Burlington Recreation Path Committee has not yet reviewed the plans. They have stated that they will review them at their next meeting. 9. The Recreation Path Committee shall review the plans and if warranted, provide comments. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. Again, the South Burlington Recreation Path Committee reviewed the sketch plans for the proposed project at its meeting on Monday March 1, 2004. 10. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. Until such time as the road network and buildings are proposed, there is no need for review by the City Engineer. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed subdivision of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\sketch phase3 3lotsubdoc SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Until such time as the road network and buildings are proposed, it is not possible to assess these criteria. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable No buildings are proposed at this time. This criterion will be assessed as individual buildings are proposed for each lot. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. No buildings are proposed at this time. This criterion will be assessed as individual buildings are proposed for each lot. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant should submit architectural details with the site plans for each individual lot. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant should submit architectural details with the site plans for each individual lot In addition to the above general review standards site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizzagalli\sketch phase3 3lotsubdoc At this time, Staff does not find a need for any additional access easements. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans do not show any dumpsters. The site plans for the individual lots should depict proposed dumpsters, adequately screened. Landscaping Pursuant to Section 13.06(A) of the Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to site plan and PUD review. Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations requires parking facilities to be curbed and landscaped with appropriate trees, shrubs, and other plants including ground covers. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(4) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas must be shown on the plans. The plans do not snow storage areas for the subject property. However, the proposed public roadway will utilize the public right-of-way for snow storage, so additional snow storage areas are not necessary for the proposed subdivision. However, staff notes that adequate snow storage areas should be depicted on the site plans for each individual lot. Landscaping budget requirements are to be determined pursuant to Section 13.06(G)(2) of the Land Development Regulations. The landscape plan and landscape budget shall be prepared by a landscape architect or professional landscape designer. All of the proposed parking areas on the subject property should be landscaped in accordance with Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations. The site plans for each individual lot should be revised to incorporate the landscaping provisions outlined in Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations. Lot Layout. According to Section 15.10 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, a minimum width to length ratio of one to five (1:5) shall be used as a guideline by the Development Review Board in evaluating lot proportions. Square or roughly square lots shall not be approved. Staff feels the five (5) proposed lots meet the goals of this requirement. Other 11. The preliminary plat submittal should include a property boundary survey prepared by a licensed land surveyor. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\pizza.qalli\sketch phase3 3lotsubdoc Staff recommends that the applicant address the numbered items in the "Comments Section" of this document and include the changes in the preliminary plat application. Respectfully submitted, Cathyanri LaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Robert Bouchard, contact for applicant CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 November 16, 2007 Bob Bouchard Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Tilley Drive Subdivision Dear Mr. Bouchard: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday November 20, 2007 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 November 8, 2007 Pizzagalli Properties, LLC c/o Bob Bouchard 50 Joy Drive' - South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a draft agenda for the November 20, 2007 Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106„stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. 'Sincerely, Sincerely, 41=#� Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. d V E R M 0 N T November 8, 2007 Mr. Dan O'Brien 150 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburi.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the November 20, 2007 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy Mc onough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Sollthl V I R M 0 N I November 8, 2007 Brian Armstrong Lora Wilson 50 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburl.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the November 20, 2007 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 November 8, 2007 Mr. Douglas Hickey 80 Old Farm Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburl.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the November 20, 2007 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, �J Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 VCRM0NI November 8, 2007 Mr. & Mrs. David Neff 700 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburl.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the November 20, 2007 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, I f Imo' Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. J PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLC October 24, 2007 Mr. Raymond Belair Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Mountain View Office Park - Tilley III Application for Subdivision Sketch Plan Review Dear Ray: 50 Joy Drive, Post Office Box 2009 South Burlington, Vermont 05407-2009 T 802.66o.6800 F 802.66o.6868 www.pizzagalliproperties.com Enclosed please find an Application for Subdivision Sketch Plan Review for Phase III of the Mountain View Office Park. Phase III of Mountain View Office Park has a street address of 47 Tilley Drive and totals 14.54 acres. It is located in the Industrial Open Space District and is situated directly north of 62 and 118 Tilley Drive. Pizzagalli Properties is seeking to subdivide this property into three lots via a Planned Unit Development. We are currently working on some conceptual site plans for each of these three lots. We hope to submit a site plan for sketch review on Lot 6 within the next couple months. Please don't hesitate to contact me with any questions. Sincerely: Zc0 Robert Bouc and Development Manager enclosures Permit Number SD -- APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, Vt. 05403 Tel #RQ2-fi6Q-6RQS Fax # $,09-660-6868 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Book 783 Pages 151-153 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 0 Toy Drive South Burlington, Vt 05403 Tel #A02-660-605 Fax #RD9-660-696R 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) Fee Simple 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Robert Bouchard 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, Vt. 05403 Tel. # 802-660-6805 Fax # 802-660-6868 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 47 Tilley Drive 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 1718-00047 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) There are presently no existing uses on this property except for a single storage barn (40' x 60') that is approximately 20 years old and scheduled for removal. b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) Pizzagalli Properties proposes to subdivide the property into three (3) separate lots, (lot 6 5.76 acres, lot 7 7.77 acres. lot 8 1.01 acres) with the intent of constructing three commercial office buildings. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) No existing buildings to remain. Proposed buildings may total'112,000 square feet. J d) Proposed height of building (if applicable) 28' high. Two stories e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) N/A f) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing .37 % Proposed N/A % unknown b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing •37 % Proposed N/A % unknown c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 0 % Proposed N/A % 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) Pizzagalli proposes utility and access easements serving lots 6.7&8. 11) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) Pizzagalli anticipates the extension of both municipal water and sewer lines to serve lots 6, 7&8. 12) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this may be provided on a separate attached sheet) North- Mr. Dan O'Brien 150 Old Farm Road South Burlington, Vermont 05403 North- Mr. Douglas Dickey Ro Old Farm Roam Routh Burlington, Vorment A543 West- Mr. Brian Armstrong/Mrs. Lora Wilson 50 old Farm Road South Burlington, Vt.05403 West- Mr. & Mrs. David Neff 700 Hinesburg Road South Burlington, Vt. 05403 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE N/A 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A sketch subdivision application fee is $125. 2 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowled . ellr SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: �� 6 I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: I ? Complete xl� ❑ Incomplete of Planning & Zoning or Designee bate 3