Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes - City Council - 06/06/1983CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, JUNE 6, 1983 CORRECTION TO MINUTES On June 6, 1983 minutes Mr. Marvin noted that on Page 6, his statement of the Highway Department's estimated population growth should include the words "in 25 years". The South Burlington City Council held a regular meeting on Monday, June 6, 1983, at 6:30 p.m., in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present Hugh Marvin, Chairman; Leona Lansing, Michael Flaherty, Paul Farrar, William Peters Others Present William Szymanski, City Manager; David Minnich, Assistant City Manager; Robert Walsh, Robert Chittenden, David Kaufman, Representatives to State legislature: Dennis Delaney, State Senator; James Walton, Corrections Commissioner; Diane Farley, John Perry, Corrections Department; Richard Turner, Superintendant, South Burlington Correctional Center; Margaret Ross, Eleanor Thomas, John Dusten, Correctional Center; Sanford Hershenson, Correctional Center Volunteer; Bob Smith, Probation & Parole, Jericho; David Spitz, City Planner; Richard Ward, Zoning Administrator, Margaret A. Picard, City Clerk; Irving A. Bates, State of Vermont Building Division; Anne Chapman, WJOY News; Ruth Poger, Pat Burgmeier, The Other Paper; Don Melvin, Irene Flitik, Burlington Free Press, James W. Goddette, Sr., South Burlington Fire Department; Albert Audette, South Burlington Street Department; William J. Schuele, Hal Bensen, Clarice Fisher, Robert Fisher, Dave Sheets, Connie Kite, Gloria Chicoine Executive Session Ms. Lansing moved that the Council go into Executive Session for the purpose of hearing a police grievance. Mr. Farrar seconded with unanimous approval. Minutes of Regular Meeting of May 16, 1983 and Organizational Meeting of May 27, 1983 Mr. Flaherty moved that the minutes of the regular meeting of May 16, 1983 and the Organizational Meeting of May 27, 1983 be approved as written. Ms. Lansing seconded with unanimous consent. Consider adoption of Insurance Committee's Rules of Operation Mr. Minnich explained that for the past several months, the School Department, City, and Insurance Committee have been meeting to determine the adequacy of the Insurance Committee. The most important question has been membership on the Committee. The recommendations being considered are a result of those meetings (see attached Memorandum). Mr. Farrar moved that the Council approve the Insurance Committee recommendations as set forth in the Assistant City Manager's memo of June 3, 1983. Mr. Flaherty seconded with unanimous consent. Review proposed Peddlers Ordinance and consider for first reading Mr. Szymanski said an auctioneer had expressed concern that they might need a license, but had expressed no further concerns after being sent a copy of the proposed ordinance, and it was felt that the Auctioneers State License would suffice. Mr. Flaherty asked whether non-profit organizations and activities, such as school bake sales or Scouts selling cookies, are exempt. Mr. Szymanski replied that Section I-D provides for this. Mr. Farrar moved that the City Council adopt the first reading of the Peddlers Ordinance as of Mr. Ward's Memorandum of June 1, 1983, and that reading of the Ordinance be waived at this time. Mr. Flaherty seconded with unanimous consent. Appointment to Boards, Committees, and Commissions Mr. Farrar moved that J. Everett Reed and James P. McClary be reappointed to 4-year terms, and John P. Dinklage and James A. Thibault be reappointed to 3 year terms on the Zoning Board. Mr. Flaherty seconded with unanimous approval. Ms. Lansing moved that Frank M. Mazur be reappointed to a 3-year term on the Chittenden County Transit Authority. Mr. Farrar seconded with unanimous consent. Regarding the Planning Commission, Mr. Farrar noted that there were several applicants who would have to be interviewed. It was also noted that an error might exist in the listing, since a second position should be up for reappointment. Mr. Szymanski said he would check on this. As there are additional applicants for the Recreation Committee, this position was kept open. Mr. Farrar moved that Diana Snyder be reappointed to the Fine Arts Committee. Mr. Flaherty seconded with unanimous approval. The Council then interviewed Connie Kite for one of the vacancies on the Natural Resources Committee. Mrs. Kite stressed her background in geology and hydrology and felt she could be useful in that capacity. Ms. Lansing then moved that Lowell Krasner be reappointed to the Natural Resources Committee. Mr. Farrar seconded with unanimous approval. Ms. Lansing stated that she felt Mr. Krasner had done a superior job on this committee. The second vacancy will not be filled until the remaining applicant has been interviewed. Mr. Farrar moved that Albert Audette be reappointed Tree Warden, for a one year term. Ms. Lansing seconded with unanimous consent. Mr. Flaherty then moved that Harold Nolting, John Dinklage, Robert Irish, Dale Kleppinger, Frederick Maher and Howard Perkett be reappointed to one year terms on the City Charter Committee. Mr. Farrar seconded with unanimous approval. Mr. Farrar moved that William Szymanski and Albert Audette be reappointed to one year terms on the Cemetery Committee. Ms. Lansing seconded with unanimous approval. It was suggested that appointments to the Corrections Center Liaison Committee be postponed in view of the upcoming discussion, as it may be deemed reasonable to enlarge that Committee. Mr. Farrar then moved that Richard Carter and William Szymanski be reappointed to one year terms on the Corrections Center Liaison Committee with the understanding that the Council can enlarge the Committee in the future. Ms. Lansing seconded with unanimous approval. Mr. Flaherty moved that George Crooks, Vernon Wamsganz, Robert LeBerge, Edwin Sanborn, and Rollin Sutton be reappointed to one year terms on the Fire Department Advisory Board. Mr. Farrar seconded with unanimous consent. Mr. Flaherty moved that Barbara Bull, Charles Houston, Ethel Schuele, and Peter Yankowski be reappointed to one year terms on the Red Rocks Committee. Mr. Farrar seconded with unanimous approval. The Council then interviewed Robert Chittenden and Albert Audette for the positions of Civil Defense Director and Assistant Civil Defense Director. Ms. Lansing asked both men how they felt about "crisis relocation." Mr. Audette said he felt the "Feds" and the other side got carried away and impassioned. He said the Feds did a good job by backing off at this time. He noted that the position should actually be called "Emergency Management Coordinator" and that now the director will be able to concentrate on local disasters and pray that nuclear incidents won't happen. In answer to the same question, Mr. Chittenden said he wasn't terribly opposed to crisis relocation, since $149,000 would be coming from the Federal government which would have gone to employment in several communities. He said he didn't think crisis relocation would help, but the money would have been useful. Mr. Marvin asked whether the position deals with local problems. Mr. Audette said the Director actually has very little power but does have access to the State which can get help. He added that you have to log all you do, in order to get Federal aid, and that in the floods of several years ago this was not done properly and it took a long time to unravel. Mr. Marvin then asked if there was a local plan for a disaster. Mr. Audette said there was a State plan and that the schools had a plan which coordinated with a local plan. Ms. Lansing then moved that Albert Audette be appointed to a one year term as Emergency Management Coordinator and that Robert Chittenden be appointed to a one year term as Assistant Emergency Management Coordinator. Mr. Farrar seconded with unanimous approval. Sign Petitions for buried telephone and TV cable Mr. Szymanski explained that there were several locations involved: 1) at Queen City Park Road; 2) 200 feet on Wilson Parkway; 3) 136 feet on Kennedy Drive, where the conduit is already in; 4) Airport Drive - 1275 feet north of the cemetery to beyond the terminal; and 5) a request from Green Mountain Cable on Kennedy Drive to start with Treetop and go westerly 1200 feet to Sugar Tree. Mr. Farrar moved to approve the petitions of New England Telephone and Green Mountain Cable as presented by the City Manager. Mr. Flaherty seconded the motion. Ms. Lansing moved to amend the motion to request that in the future similar requests be submitted before, not after, the fact. The motion was approved unanimously. Meet with Corrections Officials to discuss operations and expansion of local facility Commissioner Walton introduced members of his staff and of the facility's staff. He then outlined the workings of the system. There are 4 community correctional facilities: South Burlington, St. Johnsbury, Woodstock, and Rutland; there are also 2 central facilities: St. Albans and Windsor. The central facilities handle the two extremes of the system, with St. Albans handling medium and close security and a small number of maximum security inmates, and Windsor handling minimum security. The 4 community facilities serve geographic areas. The South Burlington facility handles offenders from Chittenden, Franklin and Grand Isle Counties. He explains that over the last several years there has been a steady increase in crime. In addition, the "population at risk" (primarily males between ages 15-34) has been increasing. In 1981, for example, there were 861 admissions to the system; in 1983 they project 1,536 admissions. The greatest increases have been in the areas of crimes against persons, motor vehicle/alcohol related incidents, and property crimes with increases of 332%, 305% and 210% respectively. In addition, the average sentence rate has been climbing, which has also put added stress on the system. In making decisions about people who come into the system, the following factors are considered: security status, the offender's community. Almost all maximum security offenders are sent out of state. At community facilities, those requiring close custody can be housed from 30-60 days; medium custory offenders from 6-9 months; minimum custody offenders from 3-6 months and community custody offenders 3-6 months. Commissioner Walter indicated that they try to have no one in a community facility with over 18 months to serve. Custody level is decided by several factors: history of institutional violence, severity of offense, prior assault, escape history, alcohol abuse, current detainers, prior felony convictions, stability factors, and length of sentence. Regarding the Chittenden County area, the Commissioner pointed out that the County has 22.5% of the State's population; 21.5% of felony convictions; 25.1% of misdemeanor convictions; 23.7% of all sentenced admissions; 34.2% of total incarcerated population; 24% of sentenced inmates; and 24.9% of the system's capacity. He added that only 51% of Chittenden County offenders are housed at the South Burlington facility. They represent 38% of the St. Albans and Windsor populations. He added that 38% of violent offenders are from Chittenden County. The South Burlington facility was built in 1975 with an original capacity of 88. This has been raised to 138 by "double bunking" rooms that were original for single occupancy. In March, 1983 the average daily population of the facility was 161. As many as 191 offenders have been at the facility at any one time. This facility also provides space for women (14 beds). No other beds in the system are available for female offenders. In the past legislative session, the Corrections Department asked for planning money to plan for expansion of the South Burlington facility. The Commissioner apologized for not communicating with the Council before this issue was raised. Mr. Farrar asked how many Chittenden County offenders now housed in other facilities would return to South Burlington if expansion occurred. The Commissioner replied that offenders in St. Albans would not since they were at a higher level of security. Some 27 offenders at Windsor would eventually move back through South Burlington and 58 medium security offenders would come back if there were room. The Commissioner explained that within 6 months of discharge, offenders return here for re-integration programming. Mr. Farrar then asked how many offenders are here who are not eligible to be here but there is no other place for them. The Commissioner acknowledged there are probably a few. Superintendent Turner said there is currently one person waiting for a bed at St. Albans. Mr. Flaherty asked what are the proposed expansion plans. The Commissioner said plans call for up to 50 additional offenders. Mr. Flaherty then asked how the additional beds will be used. Mr. Walton replied that the facility's population would be increased to about 190. He added that there were no plans to change the type of offender housed in South Burlington, since the facility was not equipped to handle higher security offenders. Mr. Flaherty noted that when the original facility was built, the City had been told the site did not lend itself to expansion. Commissioner Walton said an architect had advised that it could probably be expanded out the back and could accommodate a small wing of up to 50 beds. An engineering study still has to be done. Mr. Flaherty asked whether this would be the last expansion. The Commissioner replied it was not practical to go up; as a manager he would not want a facility of over 200 inmates. Mr. Peters said he was very surprised about the choice for expansion here. He asked whether the small wing was going to be the extent of the expansion. The Commissioner replied that he would like to see improvements to the whole facility, especially in the program area. He added that this is usually included in an expansion package. Mr. Peters asked how many acres exist in St. Albans compared to South Burlington. The Commission replied that St. Albans has 90 acres and South Burlington 2 1/2. Mr. Peters asked if the facility was to be set up for Chittenden County offenders. The commissioner replied that there are 165 volunteers who work in the Center, and that is what the community center model is based on. Mr. Peters said it didn't make sense if there was a problem in a facility with 138 offenders to increase it to 190. The Commissioner answered that a great deal of thought had gone into whether a second facility should be built in Chittenden County, but they felt it was much less expensive to expand and could be done faster. Ms. Lansing asked how sure we can be that the 50 beds will solve overcrowding instead of merely adding 50 new people. Superintendent Turner replied they are probably going to bring back those who have been sent elsewhere in an effort to keep program offenders as close to the community as possible. Mr. Marvin noted that the State Highway Department has furnished an estimated population growth of greater than the current population of the State of Vermont. He asked if it wasn't shortsighted to put in a 50-bed expansion which won't serve in the future. He also noted that the current problem with approaching sewer capacity is due in large part to the doubling of the facility's population. Rep. Walsh made the point that the intention of expansion is obviously not to alleviate overcrowding but to provide for 50 additional prisoners. He also stressed that there had been no coordination with the City when the expansion to 138 beds was made, and there was no assurance that the same situation would occur if the Corrections Department decided the currently proposed 50 beds were still not enough. He also indicated he was upset with the reception the Mr. Marvin and Mr. Szymanski had received at the Senate. He asked whether any thought had been given to a written agreement between the State and the City. The Commissioner said he thought that was a valid approach, and that such an agreement would be good for at least as long as he was in office. Mr. Walsh noted that the legislature did not feel even the Minutes of the Council meeting where promises had been made were binding. He said he would like to see something in contract form. John Dustin, a neighbor of the facility, asked how they plan to control security with an expanded facility when it is already a problem. The Commissioner replied that they have tried to do that over the last several months and that one of the things they will do will be to enhance physical plant security. Mr. Dustin said South Burlington has been lucky so far, but they feel it's like playing "Russian Roulette." Mr. Marvin asked how large a committee would be advisable to work with the Commissioner and how often they would meet. Mr. Walton said 7 or 8 people seemed about right. They would meet once a week for 4 weeks to get to know what is going on. After that, it would be up to the Committee. Mr. Marvin asked whether anyone would listen to this Committee. Mr. Turner said he had made arrangements for a few members of the St. Albans Committee to come to the first few meetings in South Burlington. They have had substantial impact on the legislature. It was asked why there are no facilities in Bennington, Brattleboro, and other communities. The Commissioner noted they have talked of replacing the old Woodstock facility with something on that I-91 corridor and have begun to address it. Mr. Schuele asked what portion of present inmates are actually out working. Mr. Turner replied there are 2 supervised crews of 6 persons each, a garden crew of 6, and 15-19 unsupervised men on "work release." Sandy Hershenson, a parole aide at the Center, noted that the amount of hysteria being engendered by the Press was out of proportion. Part of the philosophy of the Center is that community person such as himself are available to supervise people going back into society. He added that if you save one man a year, it is saving the state $30,000 for that year. Superintendent Turner noted that one day of the Committee's training would be over the classification manual. Mr. Walton added they would like people from the community to sit in on many processed. Rep. Kaufman commented that the legislation that finally passed was for $150,000 to study expansion of the facility. He asked whether expansion was being considered at any other facility. Mr. Walton said it was not and that the motivating factors were population and anticipated growth. He said expansion of some sort was being considered in the Woodstock area. Mr. Cloutier, a neighbor of the facility, stressed that the facility is in the middle of a residential area and he wanted to go on record as opposing any expansion. He added that expansion is not the answer when the forecast for growth is taken into account. Mr. Marvin advised that a committee will be formed and thanked the Commissioner and Superintendent and their staff members for attending. Confirm by Council action the recent legal settlement of the tax dispute with the Airport per request of City Auditor Mr. Szymanski explained that the dispute over taxes with the airport had been settled for about 1/3 of the taxes that were due and that the Auditor wants the Council to confirm the settlement. Mr. Farrar added that they did not waive payment of remainder of taxes until payment had been received. He noted that part of the agreement was that the City will be able to collect all future taxes. Ms. Picard asked how they will be taxed in the future. Mr. Farrar said it would be just like any other piece of property. Mr. Minnich added that what they are envisioning doing is talking with the City of Burlington to have another extended period of time agreement and they would be taxed on the basis of that agreement. Mr. Farrar moved that the Council formally waive the remainder of taxes of $57,960.34, on the Airport pursuant to our right to settle any litigation and that we sign the agreement. Ms. Lansing seconded. Mr. Peters questioned whether this would set a precedent for others not to pay taxes. Mr. Farrar said he didn't think so. What it says is that one has to look at what the reasonable outlook on litigation potential will be. If you are going to lose, it's better to settle. In the vote which followed, the motion passed 3-1 with Mr. Peters voting no. Sign Water Department Renewal Notes Mr. Szymanski explained that both notes, the first for $13,645 @ 6½% and the second for $45,025 at 6½ %, were for water lines. Mr. Farrar moved to approve and sign the water notes as presented by the City Manager. Ms. Lansing seconded with unanimous approval. Discuss the Construction of a Bicycle Lane along Spear Street It was determined that discussion would be continued until Mr. Flaherty was present since he had raised the issue. Other Business 1. Mr. Audette personally thanked the members of the Council who spent time and money to pass the recent bond issue. 2. Ms. Lansing noted that on Williston Rd. by the Community Bible Church, a speed limit sign of 50 mph has been put up. She felt this was too high. Mr. Szymanski said he would write to the State and see what happens. Mr. Audette noted that the Police Department is also in the process of trying to get it changed. Ms. Lansing also noted that the stop sign at Berkeley and Hanover is not effective and asked if it could be a 4-way stop. Mr. Audette said the area doesn't warrant it but that he would look into the situation and see if improvement could be made. Executive Session Mr. Farrar moved that the Council go into Executive Session for the purpose of discussing employee contracts and that when the session adjourns it be till 5 p.m. on Tuesday, June 7, in the small conference room. Ms. Lansing seconded with unanimous consent. The meeting adjourned at 11:45 P.M. Clerk Published by ClerkBase ©2019 by Clerkbase. No Claim to Original Government Works. MEMORANDUM ---------- TO : South Burlington City Council FROM : avid E. Minnich, Assistant City Manager DATE : June 3, 1983 SUBJECT: Insurance Committee On September 15, 1982 the South Burlington Steering Committee directed an Insurance Study Committee be formed to review: 1) the City and School District's insurance coverage and 2) the method of operption for the present Insurance Committee. The Study Committee comprised Dr. Charles Hill, Hugh Marvin, Leo Brown, Dave Minnich and representatives from the present Insurance Committee's Agencies. These firms include Hackett, Valine & Mac Donald, Hickok & Boardman, The Allen Agency, Leary Agency and Smith, Bell & Thompson. After several months of review the Study Committee is satified with our current method of obtaining insurance policies and our level of coverage. We are requesting the City Council and the School Board affirm this process by approving the "Proposed Critedia for Agency Membership" and "Operating Procedures" as presented in the attachments. I would bring to your attention the policy statement which requires that a response to an Agent's request for membership on the Insurance Committee be made by the Steering Committee within 180 days of application. A concern that was voiced by several agents at the September 15, 1982 meeting was the lack of a timely response to their membership requests. We believe 180 days is practical, given the Steering Committee meets only once every three months. It is understood, the City and School District Admbistration will be members of the Insurance Committee, the final decision to purchase specific policies will be made by the City and School District within the City Charter quidelines of general purchasing practices and those agencies serving on the Committee will be appointed by the Steering Committee for indefinite periods of time. (PROPOSED) SOUTH BURLINGTON INSURANCE COMMITTEE OPERATING PROCEDURES 1) Participation Each member agency shall designate a representative and an alternate to the committee. Both shall be qualified and authorized to represent the agency in South Burlington deliberations. The representative or alternate will be expected to be present and participate in all the meetings. 2) Decisions All questions of policy shall be decided by majority vote of those members present, however, the Chairman may designate any question as a "vote of confidence" and a failure of support for his recommendation shall create an immediate vacancy in the office of Chairman. 3) Coverage Review All exposures and policies shall beareviewed at least annually, and a written record prepared of said review. The review will include analysis of exposure, need for risk management and/or insurance coverage and form, terms and price of coverage available. Where insurance is recommended competitive quotations will be obtained. 4) Assigned Responsibilities The Chairman will assign responsibilities to each member (e.g. - real property review, Workers' Compensation claim analysis, etc.) and coordinate resulting efforts. Each member will be expected to share equitably in the work of the Insurance Committee, 5) Commission Distribution 1 All commissions shall be pooled and distributed by a formula agreed to by the participants and approved by the insured. 6) Annual Report The Chairman will prepare an annual report to South Burlington of the coverage in force, new items or alternatives considered and of the operation of the Committee. 7) Supplemental Operating Procedures: 1) South Burlington year is 1/1/ to 12/31. I 2) Commissions are accounted and distributed annually. 3) There will be a Chairman and a Vice Chairman of the Insurance Committee. Agency principals shall be the official agency representatives to the Committee and will be designated by their respective agencies. 4) Agency review will be conducted in January each year. 8) To provide improved continuity and stronger participation in the work of the'committee, the functions of the Chairman and the Vice Chairman are: A) The Chairman should: 1. take responsibility for the minutes. 2. handle correspondence as required. 3. keep permanent records of the operation of the Committee. 4. handle commission allocations. 5. be the official contact person for people at City, School and Water Department to contact. B) The Vice Chairman should: 1. serve in the temporary absence of the Chairman. 2. undertake specific assignments for detailed study of coverage problems as needed. 3. take responsibility for the "risk management" function including attendance at Committee meetings and development of a specific policy for risk assumption by South Burlington. (PROPOSED) SOUTH BURLINGTON INSURANCE COMMITTEE CRITERIA FOR AGENCY MEMBERSHIP. March 16, 1983 1. Agency Personnel Qualifications: A. Does Applicant's Representative have: 1. More than 10 years experience in Commercial Property and Casualty account supervision? 2. Accounts currently serviced with individual annual premiums of at least $50,000 and at least one account with annual premiums in excess of $100,000? 3. Demonstrated experience in risk management functions as related to large (over $100,000) commercial risks? I 4. Accessibility to Committee meetings on notice of one day or less? I 5. Demonstrated experience in handling municipal and school insurance programs. B. Does applicant ' s alternate have adequate experience (over 5 years) in supervising and servicing commercial I accounts? 2. Agency Qualifications: A. Does Agency have: 1. A -- full time Claims Department? 2. Personnel qualified to rate, endorse and otherwise provide technical service on General Liability - and Property accounts which have as a part of their programs, Retrospective Rating plans, extensive commercial property schedules, Errors and Omissions, Inland Marine and Workers Compensation policies? 3. At least one major (national) market under contract not now represented by the Committee? 4. A premium volume of at least $50,000 Excess and Surplus lines and at least one person experienced in placing such risks? B. In the event that the Agency's Representative on the committee is required to serve as Chairman, does he: 1) Have the time to devote to the South Burlington account that is necessary. i I I 2) Have the demonstrated ability by accounts serviced in his career, to be solely responsible for the supervising, I coordinating and functioning of the South Burlington Insurance Program. 3. A response to applications from other insurance agents to be included in the committee will be processed by the Insurance Committee and the Steering Committee in 180 days of the request. 4. Special Criteria: A. It is recognized that an applicant for membership on this Committee may possess qualifications, in addition to those set forth in Sections 1 and 2 which would strengthen and aid the Committee in its deliberations and operations. Any applicant who perceives that he may offer any such quality should submit complete written details outlining specifically the impact of this ability on the Committee's function. B. The Insurance Committee may, at its discretion, waive specific criteria required in Sections 1 and 2, if in its opinion the special qualifications presented would be of significant value to the City, School, Water Department of South Burlington Insurance Program. 1 LA LLL\L 1 1 VALINE & MACDONALD, INC INSURANCE 198 COLLEGE STREET P.O. BOX 488 BURLINGTON VERMONT 05402 802-658-1100 INSURANCE SCHEDULE - CITY, SCHOOL DISTRICT, WATER DEPT. 1. CBP - PACKAGE POLICY Continental Insurance Company, CBP-568952 Date: October 1, 1982 to October 1, 1985 ....... A. Blanket buildings and contents $27,430,375. All Risk, Replacement Cost, Agreed Amount $1,000 deductible. B. BOILER AND MACHINERY Replacement Cost. C. AUTOMOBILE FLEET - OWNED, NON--OWNED AND HIRED Liability, Bodily Injury 6 Property Damage ..... $ 1,000,000. ! Medical Payments ................................ 500. Uninsured Motorists ............................. 100,000. Comprehensive .................................. ACV Collision ....................................... 100. deductibl D. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY Liability Bodily Injury 6 Property Damage ...... 500/500,000. Broad Form Endorsement Teachers Liability Employees - additional insureds Champlain Water District - additional insureds Incidental Malpractice Products E. COMPREHENSIVE CRIME $25,000. Faithful Performance - Blanket Position. Money and Securities- ( on premises) .......$ 25,000. Money and Securities ( off premises) ......$ 25,000. ' Depositors Forgery ........................$ 25,000. (Money and Securities increased to $50,000, March, July 6 November - tax collection.) ., , . Page - 2 - continued INSURANCE SCHEDULE - CITY, SCHOOL DISTRICT, WATER DEPT. F. UMBRELLA LIABILITY $5,000,000 '~imit 10,000 S.I.R. 2. WORKERS' COMPENSATION A. School Department Illinois National Insurance Company, Policy #473 85 71 Date: October 1, 1982 to July 1, 1983. B. City, Water Department Kansas City Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Policy #WC 1 72 53 91 Date: October 1, 1982 - October 1, 1983 3. SPECIAL BONDS A. Margaret Picard Royal Insurance Company, Policy No. P653598 $20,000. Date: August 9, 1982 - August 9, 1983 4. A. City Constable Royal Insurance Company, Policy No. 631400 $5,000. Date: September 1, 1982 - September 1, 1983 B. City Manager $25,000. - included C. School Directors $5,000. each director - included. INSURANCE SCHEDULE - CITY , SCHOOL DISTRICT, WATER DEPT. I 5. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT LIABILITY St. Paul Insurance Company, Policy No. 560559767 Date: January 1, 1982 to January 1, 1983 Liability: $300/900,000. .,I 6. SCHOOL DEPARTMENT - INLAND MARINE M.O.A.C. (Continental) IMC353115 Date: January 1, 1982 to January 1, 1983 $206,052. - All Risk 7. CITY, WATER DEPARTMENT - INLAND MARINE M.O.A.C. ( Continental) IMC353113 Date: January 1, 1982 to January 1, 1983 $173,145. 8. PUBLIC OFFICIAL LIABILITY - CITY AND WATER DEPT. International Surplus Line Insurance Company Date: December 19, 1981 to December 19, 1984 $5,000,000 $ 1,500 Retention 9. SCHOOL BOARD LIABILITY Pacific Employers (INA) Policy No. SEL002333 $5,000,000 Date: August 8, 1982 to August 8, 1983 10. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON- INLAND MARINE M.O.A.C. ( Continental) Policy No. IMC 63 53 21 Date: January 1, 1982 - January 1, 1983 Equipment Floater - $544,204.