HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda 07_SP-22-007_916 Shelburne Rd_plansPROJECT DESCRPTION
Site plan application #SP-22-007 of DS Realty, LLC to amend a previously approved site plan for an artist
production studio and restaurant. The amendment consists of constructing an accessory structure for
licensed non-residential daycare use, expanding the parking area, and changing the mix of uses, 916
Shelburne Road.
CONTEXT
The Board reviewed a sketch plan for this project on January 18, 2022. This project is subject to Site Plan
Review Standards, Urban Design Overlay District standards, Transit Overlay District, Traffic Overlay
District Zone 1.
The property contains an existing main building and an existing carriage house containing two
residential units. The applicant is proposing to remove the existing carriage house (1,268 SF) and
construct a new carriage house (1,594 SF with 298 SF loft) situated approximately three (3) feet to the
west. Other site improvements consist of adding additional parking, removing trees, removing existing
wooden stage, platform, and walkway, and replacing a path between the main building and the carriage
house.
COMMENTS
City Planner Kelsey Peterson and Development Review Planner Marla Keene (“Planning Staff”) have
reviewed the plans submitted on 02/14/2022 and offer the following comments. Comments for the
Board’s attention are indicated in red. Applicant Responses provided 03-02-2022 are in green.
A) ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS
3.07E Accessory Structures in All Districts
(1) Accessory structures shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet in height, . . . .”
The proposed Carriage House consists of one story plus a central mezzanine loft under a
dormer. Architectural elevations provided show a height to 20’-7” with average height of 14’-9
½” and the dormer being less than 50% of the horizontal width and are not more than five (5)
feet above the average height. Staff considers this criterion met.
Commercial 1-Residential 15 Zoning District
The purpose of the Commercial 1 Zoning District is to encourage the location of higher density
residential, retail, office and vertically mixed uses in a manner that serves as or enhances a compact
central business area. Other uses that would benefit from nearby access to a central business area,
including clustered residential development and small industrial employers may be permitted.
Warehouses, major industrial employers, and incompatible industrial uses shall not be permitted. Urban
design supporting a transition for these areas from a suburban environment to compact centers is
encouraged.
10.01 Traffic Overlay District
This property is located in Traffic Overlay District Zone 1 which allows 15 trips per 40,000 sf of land area
without provision of additional mitigation measures. The parcel is 71,059 SF, making the traffic budget
26.64 trips per hour during PM peak hour.
The Applicant stated that the total PM peak hour trips is 22.92 trips per hour, based on using ITE
designation #530 – Private School (K-8) and #930 – Fast Casual Restaurant. However, the Applicant also
states that the bakery, which is the “Fast Casual Restaurant” has “no accommodations to consume the
pies or other food on-site” and all pick-up by customers is done at an “off-site location in Burlington”.
Staff considers using “Fast Casual Restaurant” as the land-use category for a bakery with no on-site
customers to be illogical. The Applicant includes 2.38 trips per hour in its calculation for this use.
Without that use, the proposed trip generation is 20.54 trips per hour.
BFJ Planning, the traffic reviewer on this project in the absence of a permanent Director of Public Works,
reviewed this project on 2/16/2022 and offers the following comments.
BFJ recommends that the PM Peak Hour trip generation for the new childcare facility should be
based on ITE #565 Day Care Center. Lamoureux & Dickinson’s utilization of ITE Land-Use #530
(Private School, K-8) results in an estimated PM peak hour generation of 6.24 trips as shown in
Table 1 of the technical memo. However, when utilizing ITE #565 Day Care Center, this increases
the PM peak hour generation to 21 trips for the childcare facility.
Changing this ITE land-use category for the proposed childcare facility would result in a total of
38 trips during the PM peak hour, exceeding the traffic budget for this site. The traffic budget
would be exceeded even if the applicant had chosen the ITE Private School K-12 land use
category for the Art Studio.
1. Staff recommends the applicant be required to update their traffic study. If the trips exceed
the budget of 26.64 trips per hour during PM peak hour, the DRB should require the applicant to
provide mitigation as provided in LDR Appendix B.
RESPONSE: We have been in touch with Georges Jacquemart of BFJ, and we understand that BFJ will
be recommending an adjustment factor to reduce the ITE #565 Day Care Center pm peak hour trips to
take into account the earlier closing and pick-up time of the proposed child care facility / preschool. In
our discussions with Mr. Jacquemart, he proposed that L&D would then recalculate the proposed traffic
budget. He also indicated that he would propose that those calculations could be incorporated into a
condition of approval.
10.05D Urban Design Overlay District Standards
While a portion of the property does fall within the boundaries of the Urban Design Overlay District, the
proposed building does not. Therefore, standards under 10.05D do not apply to the proposed Carriage
House. No changes to the principal building are proposed.
B) SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS
14.06 General Review Standards
A. Relationship of Proposed Structures to the Site.
(1) The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from
structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and
adequate parking areas.
Transitions are discussed under 14.06(C) below. Adequacy of planting and pedestrian
movement are discussed elsewhere in this document. Staff considers the quantity of parking
areas to be adequate.
(2) Parking:
(a) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings. Any side of a building
facing a public street shall be considered a front side of a building for the purposes of
this subsection.
Existing parking is to the front of the principal building. There are no changes proposed
to the non-conforming parking. The additional parking is proposed to be to the side of
the building. Staff considers this criterion met.
(c) Parking area width. Surface parking areas and affiliated drive aisles located to
the side of buildings shall not exceed the building width along any street frontage. This
may be calculated separately or cumulatively for corner lots. Parking approved
pursuant to 14.07(B)(2)(b) shall be exempt from this subsection.
As viewed from Shelburne Road, the width of parking is not proposed to change. As
viewed from Lindenwood Drive, this criterion is met.
(3) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height
and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or anticipated
adjoining buildings.
The footprint of the building is similar to the footprint of the existing building to be removed. It
is proposed to be one story with a mezzanine loft in a dormer. It will be shorter than the main
building on the site, but appears to include related architectural elements.
The proposed Carriage House is located approximately 10 feet from the property line with a
residential use. The residential use to the east is a single-family home with outbuilding, both of
which appear to be similar in scale to the proposed Carriage House and the same or taller in
height. Staff considers the proposed Carriage House to be compatible with the height and scale
of this residential use.
C. Relationship of Structures and Site to Adjoining Area.
(1) The Development Review Board shall encourage the use of a combination of common
materials and architectural characteristics (e.g., rhythm, color, texture, form or detailing),
landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between
buildings of different architectural styles.
(2) Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to
existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed
structures.
The applicant has provided renderings of the proposed building’s exterior elevations. The Davis
Studio main building appears to be Victorian in style. The proposed Carriage House building is
designed in a less ornate style but with consistent architectural features like shed dormers and
pitched rooves over doors. The two buildings will not be identical in style, but use similar
materials and with similar enough architectural interest to meet this criterion. Staff considers
this criterion met.
14.07 Specific Review Standards
In all Zoning Districts and the City Center Form Based Codes District, the following standards shall
apply:
A. Environmental Protection Standards. All proposed development shall be subject to the
applicable requirements of Article 12, Environmental Protection Standards.
None of the resources identified in Article 12 exist on the site.
B. Site Design Features. All proposed development shall comply with standards for the
placement of buildings, parking and loading areas, landscaping and screening, open space,
stormwater, lighting, and other applicable standards related to site design pursuant to these
Land Development Regulations.
These standards are contained in Article 13 and are discussed below.
C. Access and Circulation. All proposed development shall comply with site access and
circulation standards of Section 15.A.14.
Much of 15.A.14 pertains to the construction of streets, which are not applicable to this
application. The applicable sections of 15.A.14 follow.
15.A.14 (D) Functional Capacity and Transit Oriented Development. The nearest signalized
intersection or those intersections specified by the DRB shall have an overall level of
service “D” or better, at the peak street hour, including the anticipated impact of the fully
developed proposed PUD or subdivision. In addition, the level of service of each through
movement on the major roadway shall have a level of service of “D” or better at full
buildout.
As noted above, the number of vehicle trips added by the proposed Carriage House is
disputed between the Applicant and the independent reviewer. Based on the independent
reviewer’s report, this project proposes to exceed the allowed trips during PM peak hour.
Access to the site is only from Shelburne Road/Route 7 which, at the point of access, is a
five-lane road including a bi-directional left turn lane.
There is no further information provided by the Applicant about any discussions with VTrans
about impact to Shelburne Road/Route 7 from generated trips.
2. Staff recommends the DRB require the applicant to communicate with VTrans to
determine if mitigation is required.
RESPONSE: See attached Jurisdictional Opinion from VTrans provided herein dated 02/28/2022.
15.A.14(E) Access and Circulation. The applicant must demonstrate that the street network
is arranged to meet applicable access management, traffic, and pedestrian circulation
standards under these Regulations, including criteria for site plans under Article 14,
Transect Zone Subdivisions under Article 9, or a type of Planned Unit Development under
Article 15.C; and, for state highways, VTrans Access Management Program Guidelines in
effect at the time of application. Unless otherwise specified under these regulations, the
street network, including the location and arrangement of streets, must be designed to:
(1)-(6) not applicable
(7) Provide for safe access to abutting properties for motorists, cyclists, and
pedestrians, including safe sight distances, access separation distances, and
accommodations for high-accident locations.
3. Though the site meets the requirement to have a direct connection to the sidewalk
on Shelburne Road, it appears there is no continuous connection between the
proposed Carriage House and Shelburne Road. Staff recommends the Board
consider whether to require the applicant to require the sidewalk that connects the
Carriage House to the main building and parking to continue to Shelburne Road to
provide connectivity for users who may arrive by means other than motor vehicle.
RESPONSE: Project team shall discuss this with the Board as recommended
in staff comments. (PS)
Staff considers the elements of this criterion pertaining to sight distance, access
separation distances and accommodations for high-accident locations to be met.
(8) Align access point with existing intersections or curb cuts and consolidate existing
access points or curb cuts within the subdivision, to the extent physically and
functionally feasible.
The applicant is not proposing to change the access point to Shelburne Road. Staff
considers this criterion met.
(9) Minimize vehicular access point (curb cuts) to abutting properties and building lots
along pedestrian oriented street frontage; and provide, where feasible, shared
vehicular access to frontage and other abutting building lots via rear alleys, side
streets, service lanes, shared driveways, or rear cross connections between adjoining
parcels.
The applicant is not proposing to change the access point to Shelburne Road. Staff
considers this criterion met.
D. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) [reserved]
E. Building Form. Development within the City Center Form Based Code District, the Urban
Design Overlay District, and other districts with supplemental building form standards shall
adhere to the standards contained therein.
This criterion does not apply as no overlay or related districts apply to the location of the
proposed Carriage House.
F. Streetscape Improvements. A proposed new construction or extension/expansion of an
existing structure exceeding the thresholds listed in either (a) Section 14.09(B) or (b) Section
8.11(D) within the City Center Form Based Code, or Section 3.15(D) in all other zoning districts,
shall be required to upgrade adjacent sidewalks, greenbelts, and related street furniture
(trees, benches, etc.) to the standards contained within the applicable Street Type and
Building Envelope Standard. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to limit
requirements for additional upgrades as necessary to meet the requirements of these
Regulations.
Staff considers no improvements to Shelburne Road to be needed.
F. Access to Abutting Properties. The reservation of land may be required on any lot for
provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce
curb cuts onto an arterial or collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or
other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area.
See 13.02F below for discussion of access.
G. Utility Services. Electric, telephone and other wire-served utility lines and service
connections shall be underground insofar as feasible and subject to state public utilities
regulations. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a
harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Standards of Section 15.A.18,
Infrastructure, Utilities, and Services, shall also be met.
The City of South Burlington Water District reviewed the proposed plans on 2/14/2022 and
offered the following comments regarding public water service to the property.
1. The water service line to the existing Carriage House is ¾” copper at the curb stop.
2. Upon request, the SBWD will shut the water off on the service line to the Carriage House
so that the tee to the A-Frame can be removed and tied back together, and the water
meter can be removed when the carriage house is demolished and renovated.
3. ¾” copper will be required for the service line. If a larger service is required, then the
existing service will be shut off at the corporation, and the service line disconnected from
the main. Tapping fees shall be applied if a new service line is required.
4. As this project includes a change of use, a Water Allocation Application, found on the
South Burlington Water Department website must be completed and submitted to the
SBWD. All fees must be paid prior to restoring the water meter and water service to the
new building.
RESPONSE: The proposed project will reduce water demand at the site. An application for
Water Allocation has been submitted to reflect the use changes and reduction in
demand. Since a demand reduction is projected, no fees are required and no negative
impacts are anticipated within the municipal collection system or at the treatment
plant. The application has been submitted as a way of documenting change of use, and
we request that the hearing not be held open for this item. (PB)
The South Burlington Department of Public Works also reviewed the proposed plans on
2/16/2022 and offers the following comments.
1. The plans do not show a grease trap for the previously approved restaurant. The
application will need to prepare and submit a Grease, Oil and Sand Interceptor Permit as
part of this application.
RESPONSE: There is an existing grease trap in the basement, below the kitchen. The owner
indicated that the grease trap was requested, installed, and reviewed by the City as part
of the Café approval process in 2016. (PB)
2. If the property has not already obtained a wastewater allocation for the change in use,
they will need to submit that application. DPW does not require a new wastewater connection
application as the connection to the City system is remaining the same.
RESPONSE: The proposed project will reduce wastewater demand at the site. A Wastewater
Allocation form has been submitted to reflect the use changes and reductions in
demand. Since a demand reduction is projected, no impact fees or negative impacts to
the municipal water system are anticipated. The application has been submitted as a
way of documenting change of use, and we request that the hearing not be held open
for this item. (PB)
4. Staff recommends that the DRB require the applicant to obtain a preliminary water and
wastewater allocation prior to closing the hearing and obtain a grease interceptor permit
prior to issuance of a zoning permit.
RESPONSE: Applications have been submitted for water and wastewater allocations. There is an
existing grease trap in the basement, below the kitchen. The owner indicated that the
grease trap was requested, installed, and reviewed by the City as part of the Café
approval process in 2016. We have verified that the grease trap is in place. The grease
trap was discussed with Tom DiPietro of South Burlington DPW. Tom indicated no issues
with the grease trap and has requested that an application be submitted for
documentation purposes only. We request that the hearing not be held open for this
item. (PB)
H. Disposal of Wastes. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including
compliance with any recycling, composting, or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure
and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the
enclosure(s). Small receptacles intended for use by households or the public (ie, non-dumpster,
non-large drum) shall not be required to be fenced or screened.
The applicant includes an area labeled “dumpsters” surrounded by a wooden fence on the
submitted Site Plan. No further detail is included about the fence, including height, opacity,
access to the dumpsters, or how the enclosure is secured.
5. Staff recommends the DRB require the applicant to provide further information regarding
the dumpsters and associated fence before closing the hearing.
RESPONSE: The existing dumpster on-site will remain unchanged. The dumpster area is properly
screened and includes opaque fencing as required. The fencing surrounds the entire
dumpster area and is 75 inches in height. See photos below. (PS)
C) SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS
13.02 Off Street Parking and Loading
F. Access management Requirements. It is the intent of the City to minimize traffic and
pedestrian conflicts caused by vehicular driveways on public roadways by reducing the
number of required driveways and by minimizing the number of vehicles utilizing such
driveways off public roadways. All applicants must make an effort to reduce these impacts. All
commercial lots (retail, restaurant, office, service uses, excluding residential, agricultural and
industrial uses) located adjacent to other commercial lots must provide a driveway connection
to any adjacent commercial lot. If the adjacent property owner does not want to provide for
that connection, the applicant must provide an easement to do so in the future when
circumstances may change. This driveway connection or easement should be located where
vehicular and pedestrian circulation is most feasible.
LDR 13.02F requires all commercial lots located adjacent to other commercial lots to provide a
driveway connection to any adjacent commercial lot. It goes on to state that if the adjacent
property owner does not want to provide for that connection, the applicant must provide an
easement to do so in the future when circumstances may change. This driveway connection or
easement should be located where the vehicular and pedestrian circulation is most feasible.
6. The only abutting commercial property is located to the south and Staff considers this
criterion is not met for that property. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to
provide on the plans and record a 20-foot cross-lot easement to the east of the stormwater
treatment area on this site to the benefit of the adjacent property to the south, Parcel ID
1540-00930. If such a connection were appropriate in the future, it would require
reconfiguration of the parking spaces proposed in that location.
RESPONSE: Plans have been revised to show a potential future easement to benefit the commercial
lot to the south as requested. The easement is shown running north and then turning
left to exit onto Shelburne Rd. (PB)
We also understand that if such a connection were appropriate in the future, it would
require reconfiguration / removal of two parking spaces proposed in that location. (PS)
G. Design requirements for Parking Spaces, Parking Aisles, Lighting and Landscaping
(1) Design requirements for off-street parking and loading are provided in Table 13-2
and Figure 13-1, Section 13.04, Landscaping , Screening, and Street Trees, and Section
13.07, Exterior Lighting. All paved parking spaces shall be striped or otherwise
physically delimited.
The applicant is proposing parking angled at 90° as measured in Table 13-2 and Figure
13-1. The required dimensions are as follows.
The applicant is proposing to make the parking stalls exactly the minimum width and
length required. It meets the aisle width by exceeding it by two feet. If the applicant
were to meet the specific requirement, there would be 2-ft less pavement on the site,
which would move the parking area two feet farther from abutters to the south.
7. Staff recommends the Board discuss reducing the width of the aisle to increase
distance from the abutters and reducing total impervious surface.
RESPONSE: The parking lot aisle width has been reduced to 24’. (PB)
Landscape buffer increase. The Landscape buffer along South side has been increased
with this modification. The buffer along the South side is now approximately 35.5 ft
more than double than the 15 ft minimum landscape buffer required per the
regulations. (PS)
Impervious surfacing changes. The existing impervious surface totals have now
decreased and the impervious coverage plan has been updated. (PS)
Parking lot landscaping is further discussed under 13.04 below.
(2) The location of parking areas and loading docks shall prevent conflicts with
entering and existing traffic onto a public street and prevent conflicts between
vehicles and pedestrians. The distance between access points and parking areas shall
be adequate to minimize blockage and prevent back-ups onto the public street.
Staff considers this criterion met.
(3) Provision shall be made for access by police, fire and emergency vehicles.
The Fire Chief reviewed the plans on 2/23/2022 and indicated “They have met all of the
IBC, NFPA 1 Chpt 18 & all applicable city ordinances regarding FD access.“ Staff
considers this criterion met.
(4) Pedestrian safety. Insofar as practicable, pedestrian and bicycle circulation shall be
separated from motor vehicle circulation. Safe and convenient pedestrian circulation,
including appropriate sidewalks, shall be provided on the site and its approaches. The
pedestrian circulation on site shall be designed to minimize adverse effects of
vehicular traffic on sidewalks and recreation paths.
Staff’s comments pertaining to pedestrian circulation, and particularly to pedestrian
connectivity between the street and the site, is discussed under 14.07C above.
(5) Bicycle parking or storage facility. See Section 13.03
(6) Stormwater management strategies that facilitate infiltration including but not
limited to recessed planting islands, bioretention facilities, and pervious parking
spaces are encouraged in the design of any off-street parking or loading area.
Stormwater management is discussed under 13.05 below.
13.03 Bicycle Parking and Storage.
There appear to be zero bicycle racks provided in the Site Plan. The minimum requirement for bicycle
parking is as follows.
8. Based on the provided floor plans and proposed uses, the applicant is not meeting the requirements
for either short-term or long-term bicycle parking, or for clothes lockers. No showers or changing
facilities are required. Staff recommends the Board require the applicant to modify the plans to
provide the required bike parking and clothes locker prior to closing the hearing.
RESPONSE: Short Term Bike Parking. Short Term bike parking is met with use of the existing 10-
space bike rack (see photo). The Landscape plan has been updated to include the bike
rack location. (4 minimum spaces required and 10 provided). (PS)
RESPONSE: Long Term Bike Parking. 13.03 C. (1) indicates that the standards for Long Term Bicycle
storage apply to: “(a) Construction of new mixed use or commercial buildings….” The new building will
include 4 employees. We agree to provide 2 long term bike parking spaces within the ground-floor level
of the stair tower of primary building (see landscape plan). In addition 1 locker will be provided here
meeting the dimensional criteria in 13.03C(2)(b)(ii) and “shall be lockable with the following minimum
dimensions: 12” wide, 18” deep, 36” high.” . (PS)
13.04 Landscaping, Screening & Street Trees
B. Except for parking spaces accessory to a one-family or two-family dwelling, all off-street
parking areas subject to review by the Development Review Board, shall be curbed and landscaped
with appropriate trees, shrubs, and other plants including ground covers, as approved by the
Development Review Board. Sections of recessed curb are permitted if their purpose is to allow
stormwater runoff from the adjacent parking area to reach stormwater collection, treatment and
management infrastructure. The Development Review Board shall consider the adequacy of the
proposed landscaping to assure the establishment of a safe, convenient, and attractive parking area
and the privacy and comfort of abutting properties.
(1) All off-street parking areas shall be landscaped around the perimeter of the lot with trees,
shrubs and other plants. Perimeter planting shall be set back from the curb sufficiently to allow for
snow storage. The purpose of perimeter planting shall be to mitigate the view of the parking lot
from the public way and from adjacent uses and properties, and to provide shade and canopy for
the parking lot. In some situations, it may be necessary both for surveillance purposes and for the
perception of safety to install the size and type of plants that leave visual access between the
parking lot to the public way or other pedestrian areas.
Staff considers this criterion to have been met.
(2) In all parking areas containing twenty-eight (28) or more contiguous parking spaces and/or in
parking lots with more than a single circulation lane, at least ten percent (10%) of the interior of
the parking lot shall be landscaped islands planted with trees, shrubs and other plants. Such
requirement shall not apply to structured parking or below-ground parking.
The applicant has provided for no interior landscaped islands and includes a total of 44 parking
spaces. This criterion has not been met.
9. Staff recommends the DRB require the applicant to provide plans with at least 10% of interior of
the parking lot with landscaped islands. This could include landscaping replacing proposed
parking spaces, as long as they meet the 10% requirement. Staff recommends the landscape
islands be located to preserve existing mature trees.
RESPONSE: Interior landscape islands do not apply. The project does not include 28 contiguous
parking spaces, nor does the project include a double circulation lane layout where an interior island can
be provided. Also, it should be noted there is physically no room within a single circulation lane to place
an interior landscape island. This requirement only applies when an area contains 28 or more
“contiguous” parking spaces and/or in parking lots with more than a single circulation lane as noted per
Sec 13.04B.(2). (PS). Regardless, a robust landscape area surrounding the parking area is provided. The
landscape plan has also been modified per these staff comments to provide additional trees and
landscape plantings within the perimeter landscape areas.
The following diagram fig 13-4 of the regulations provides example of acceptable internal landscape
island requirements when more than a single circulation lane is provided.
Removal of mature trees is discussed below.
(3) All interior and perimeter planting shall be protected by curbing unless specifically designed as
a collection and treatment area for management of stormwater runoff as per 13.04(B)(5)(c)
below. Interior planted islands shall have a minimum dimension of six (6) feet on any one side, and
shall have a minimum square footage of sixty (60) square feet. Large islands are encouraged.
The applicant has provided no interior landscaped islands; therefore, this criterion is also not met.
(4) Landscaping Requirements
The City Arborist reviewed the proposed plans on 2/15/2022 and provided the following
comments.
1. Recommend planting Dogwoods and Coneflower further off edge of parking lot to
avoid plow damage.
RESPONSE: With the vehicular drive aisle reduced from 26ft to 24ft the planting area here has now
increased in size providing more room for the dogwood shrubs and coneflower
plantings with ability to place them farther from the edge of pavement. Please see
modified civil and landscape plans. (PS)
2. Should include more detailed Tree Protection Plan for existing trees. Tree protection
limits should be based on tree diameter, generally 8-12 inches per inch of diameter,
limits on activity within tree protection zone, etc.
RESPONSE: The tree protection notes on the EPSC plan have been revised to base tree protection
limits on trunk size rather than tree height per staff request. (PB)
3. Unless landscape credit is being given for preserving existing trees, the landscape
value seems high.
RESPONSE: We have amended the landscape plan to include additional trees and shrub plantings
per staff comments. We have also revised the landscape cost estimate to reflect new
planting values with the enhanced landscaping plan.
(a) Landscaping shall include a variety of trees, shrubs, grasses and ground covers. All
planting shall be species hardy for the region and, if located in areas receiving road runoff or
salt spray, shall be salt-tolerant.
10. Staff recommends the DRB require the plantings of dogwood and coneflower be placed
farther from the parking edge.
RESPONSE: As mentioned in the arborist comments, the vehicular drive aisle was reduced from 26ft
to 24ft and the planting area here has increased in size providing more room for the
dogwoods and coneflower plantings to be placed farther from the edge of pavement.
Please see modified civil and landscape plans. (PS)
(b) At least one (1) major deciduous shade tree shall be provided within or near the
perimeter of each parking area, for every five (5) parking spaces. The trees shall be placed
evenly throughout the parking lot to provide shade and reduce glare. Trees shall be placed a
minimum of thirty (30) feet apart.
The applicant appears to have not met this criterion in the south-east corner of the parking
area. Only small shrubs, other plants, and lawn are proposed to border the last thirteen parking
spaces. It also appears that no deciduous shade trees are proposed for the north side of the
parking area. Thirty-eight (38) parking spaces are proposed in the disturbed portion of the
parking lot.
11. Staff recommends the DRB require additional major deciduous shade trees be planted in
these areas to comply with this criterion.
RESPONSE: There are a total of 44 parking spaces. A perimeter tree is required for every 5 parking
spaces. Therefore 9 trees are required. There are already 9 existing deciduous shade
trees surrounding the perimeter of the parking area this includes:
(2) Red Maple Trees
(5) Crabapple Trees
(2) Sugar Maple Trees
In addition to the existing perimeter trees that will remain, we are including 3 more
major deciduous shade trees as recommended by Staff. (see revised landscape plan).
This will provide a total of 12 perimeter landscape trees (3 more than required).
12. Distance between the impervious surface of the far eastern end of the parking lot and the
existing deciduous tree proposed to be retained should be increased to provide greater
protection to that existing tree.
RESPONSE: We believe there are solutions without having to reduce the number of proposed
parking spaces. This includes root pruning measures as recommended by an arborist and per
Heartwood Landscape and Tree Services LLC. In addition, the 24ft width of the vehicular “back-in” area
can be modified in order to increase the distance between the impervious surface at the far eastern end
of the parking area as recommended by staff. This idea is shown on the revised landscape plan. (PS)
(5) and (6) do not apply, as no planting islands or solar canopies have been proposed.
(7) Snow storage areas must be specified and located in an area that minimizes the potential for
erosion and contaminated runoff into any adjacent or nearby surface waters.
Snow storage is only indicated on the proposed landscaping plan (Sheet L-01) and does not
indicate a boundary for the storage area. The area appears coincident with the grass swale for
stormwater collection labeled C9 on the Site Plan (C2.1) serving much of the southeastern part
of the parking lot. Storing snow in a manner that fills the swale could cause issues during
snowmelt and impediment of the stormwater system.
13. Staff recommends the DRB require the applicant to indicate the boundaries of the snow
storage area and provide snow storage not coincident with stormwater treatment or
conveyance practices.
RESPONSE: Snow storage areas are now identified on sheet C2.1. (PB)
C. Screening or buffering. The Development Review Board will require landscaping, fencing, land
shaping and/or screening along property boundaries (lot lines) whenever it determines that a) two
adjacent sites are dissimilar and should be screened or buffered from each other, or b) a property’s
appearance should be improved, which property is covered excessively with pavement or structures or
is otherwise insufficiently landscaped, or c) a commercial, industrial, and multi-family use abuts a
residential district or institutional use, or (d) a parking or loading area is adjacent to or visible from a
public street.
The abutters to the east and south-east are single-family residences. Staff recommends the DRB find
that the adjacent sites are dissimilar for that reason and require buffering or screening. See additional
discussion of buffering under 3.06I below.
(1) There shall be sufficient landscaping, walls, or fencing of sufficient height (minimum of
three (3) feet) and opacity to effectively screen the parking or loading area year-round from
adjacent public streets.
The adjacent public streets are Shelburne Road and Lindenwood Drive. The proposed Carriage
House building screens the parking from Lindenwood Drive. From Shelburne Road, the parking
is not screened and opportunities for further screening exist.
14. Staff recommends the DRB require the applicant to provide screening from Shelburne Road
which will also address some of the deficit in the landscaping budget discussed below.
RESPONSE: Plans have been revised to include shrub plantings to provide screening from Shelburne
Road. And adjustments have been made to the landscape budget. (PS)
(2) Screening of a parking or loading shall be provided where headlights from vehicles on
site may be visible and project parallel to a public street.
Staff considers compliance with this criterion to be unchanged by the proposed project.
(3) There shall be sufficient landscaping, walls, or fencing of sufficient height and opacity
to effectively screen outdoor storage areas, refuse, recycling, and compost collection
(excluding on-site composting) areas.
Discussed above.
(3) The landscaping shall be designed to minimize erosion and stormwater runoff, and to
protect neighboring residential properties from the view of uses and parking areas on the site.
The landscaping shall be of such type, height, and spacing, as in the judgment of the
Development Review Board, will effectively screen the activities on the lot from the view of persons
standing on adjoining properties. The plan and specifications for such planting shall
be filed with the approved plan for the use of the lot.
The applicant has not provided landscaping of a type, height, and spacing to effectively screen
the activities on the lot from the view of persons standing on adjoining properties. No trees or
tall shrubs are proposed to screen the south-east portion of the parking lot or the “play area”
from residential properties to the east and south-east.
15. Staff recommends the DRB require additional landscaping near or along the east and southeast
boundaries to screen the parking lot and play area from surrounding residential
properties.
RESPONSE: We have provided additional landscaping (trees and shrubs) to the plan. We ask staff
and the DRB to understand that all the existing trees along the East and South-East property line will
remain with exception of the two pines on the East side scheduled for removal. The other 4 pine trees
scheduled to be removed are interior of the lot (beyond the 15foot landscape buffer area from S & E).
Please see the attached photos of the existing landscape trees and plantings that will remain along the
South and East Property lines. This includes a dense cedar hedge, various hardwood trees, and multiple
crabapple trees. The minimum required landscape buffer here is 15feet; the existing edge of pavement
includes a substantial landscape area setback 32.3 ft from the South property line. With a reduced
vehicular travel lane to 24ft, the edge of pavement here increases the landscape area from 32.3ft to
35.5ft from the South Property line.
Again, In response to staff comments we are providing additional landscape plantings along both the
east and southeast boundaries. See revised landscape plan.
CEDAR HEDGE AND CRABAPPLE TREES TO REMAIN ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
CEDAR HEDGE AND CRABAPPLE TREES TO REMAIN ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
CEDAR HEDGE AND HARDWOOD TREES TO REMAIN ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
HARDWOOD TREES TO REMAIN ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
MIXED HARDWOOD AND CEDAR TREES TO REMAIN ALONG EAST PROPERTY LINE
MIXED HARDWOOD AND CEDAR TREES TO REMAIN ALONG EAST PROPERTY LINE
AND NEW BUILDING FOOTPRINT SHALL BE SET 3FT FURTHER WEST
MIXED HARDWOOD AND CEDAR TREES TO REMAIN ALONG EAST PROPERTY LINE
MIXED HARDWOOD AND CEDAR TREES TO REMAIN ALONG SOUTH EAST CORNER
HARDWOOD TREES TO REMAIN ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
CEDAR HEDGE AND CRABAPPLE TREES TO REMAIN ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
-----------Existing landscape buffer trees along PL to remain --------------------------- | Pines to remove |
CEDAR HEDGE AND HARDWOOD TREES TO REMAIN ALONG SOUTH PROPERTY LINE
(4 PINES BEYOND 15FT LANDSCAPE SETBACK ON SOUTH SIDE TO BE REMOVED)
Pine scheduled to be removed with
existing canopy height approx. 18-
20ft from grade.
Revised landscape plans include
additional deciduous trees along the
play area fencing. (see plan).
(5)-(7) do not apply to this application.
G. (3) Landscaping Budget Requirements. The Development Review Board shall require minimum
planting costs for all site plans, as shown in Table 13-4 below. In evaluating landscaping requirements,
some credit may be granted for existing trees or for site improvements other than tree planting as
long as the objectives of this section are not reduced. The costs below are cumulative; for example, a
landscaping budget shall be required to show a planned expenditure of three percent of the first
$250,000 in construction or improvement cost plus two percent of the next $250,000 in construction or
improvement cost, plus one percent of the remaining cost over $500,000. The landscaping budget shall
be prepared by a landscape architect or professional landscape designer.
The applicant has stated the cost estimate of this project to be $450,000 and has proposed $12,450 in
landscaping. The project is required to have a landscaping budget equal to 3% of the first $250,000 in
costs, then 2% of the next $250,000. It is required to have a landscaping budget of $11,500.
The applicant cannot count incidental preservation of existing plantings ($3,000) as value in the
landscaping budget. Further, the cost of seeding lawn areas ($1,200) and bark mulch ($400) cannot be
counted to meet the landscaping budget requirement.
16. Staff recommends the DRB request the applicant to provide a revised landscaping budget that meets
the required $11,500 before closing the hearing.
RESPONSE: A revised landscape budget exceeding the required $11,500 has been provided. The
increased budget includes the added shrub plantings for screening from Shelburne road as
recommended by staff and for additional perimeter trees as shown on the revised landscape plan. (PS)
Revised Cost Estimate (in detail; edits per staff comments in green color):
13.05 Stormwater Management
Stormwater standards apply when one-half acre or more of impervious surface exists or is proposed to
exist, and where 5,000 sf of impervious is created or reconstructed.
The City Stormwater Section reviewed the plans on February 22, 2022 and offers the following
comment:
1. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to regularly maintain all stormwater
treatment and conveyance infrastructure.
13.07 Exterior Lighting
Lighting requirements are summarized as follows.
(1) Fixtures must be downcast and shielded
(2) Illumination must be evenly distributed
(3) Fixtures must be placed to minimize lighting from becoming a nuisance
(4) Poles shall be rustproof metal, cast iron, fiberglass, finished wood or similar structural
material, with a decorative surface or finish
(5) Poles & building mounted fixtures may be no higher than 30-ft
(6) Poles must be located in safe locations
The applicant’s provided plans do not show any exterior lighting exists on the site. It does include a
lighting fixture cut sheet, but it is unclear where it will be installed.
17. Staff recommends the DRB clarify with the applicant where the lighting fixture is proposed, and that
no exterior lighting exists or is proposed.
There are 3 building mounted light
fixtures proposed. These are all
shown on sheet A200. They are
mounted above all building door
entries.
The fixtures proposed are LED,
Downcasting, and they are Dark Sky
compliant.
Existing Lighting to remain (see civil plan & landscape plan for all locations)
13.11 Fences
The applicant has not included any additional fences in this Site Plan, so this section does not apply.
Staff notes that if the DRB decides to require fencing as part of additional screening from abutting
properties, review under this section will be required.
3.06I Setback and Buffer Strip Adjacent to Residential District Boundaries
(1) Setback to residential zoning districts. Any new, reconstructed, or expanded principal building
located wholly or primarily in a non-residential zoning district shall retain a setback of not less than
sixty-five (65) feet from all adjacent residential zoning districts, unless applicable lots are part of a
Master Plan or Planned Unit Development.
The proposed Carriage house is located in a non-residential zoning district within 65 feet from an
adjacent residential zoning district, but the proposal is for an accessory building to the main Davis Studio
building. Staff considers that this provision does not apply.
(2) Buffer strip. A buffer strip not less than fifteen (15) feet wide within the sixty-five (65) foot setback
in subsection (1) shall be installed and landscaped with dense evergreens, fencing, and/or other
plantings as a screen. New external light fixtures shall not ordinarily be permitted within the fifteen
(15) foot wide buffer area.
Staff considers this section to be not applicable.
(3) The Development Review Board may permit new or expanded nonresidential uses, structures
and/or parking areas, and new external light fixtures, within the setback and/or buffer as set forth in
(1) or (2) above, and may approve a modification of the width of the required setback and/or
landscaped buffer as set forth in (1) above. In doing so the DRB shall find that the proposed lighting,
landscaping and/or fencing to be provided adjacent to the boundary of the residential district will
provide equivalent screening of the noise, light and visual impacts of the new non-residential use to
that which would be provided by the standard setback and buffer requirements in (1) above. However
in no case may the required side or rear setback be reduced below the standard requirement for the
zoning district in which the non-residential use is located.
While (1) above does not apply, (3) does apply to any “new or expanded nonresidential uses, structures
and/or parking areas . . . within the setback or buffer as set forth in (1) or (2) above, and [the Board] may
approve a modification of the width of the required setback and/or landscaped buffer as set forth in (1)
above.” Staff notes that this differentiates between the principal structure setback in (1) and approval of
other structures and parking areas.
18. Staff recommends the DRB require the lighting, landscaping and/or fencing to “provide equivalent
screening of the noise, light and visual impacts of the new non-residential use to that which would be
provided by the standard setback and buffer requirements in (1) above.” Staff considers the
application to not currently meet this standard, given the lack of buffering landscaping or structures
along the east and south boundaries.
RESPONSE:
The landscape area already meets the requirements of Section 3.06I Buffer Strip Adjacent to Residential
District Boundaries. The buffer strip here is over 30feet in depth, exceeding the buffer as set forth in
part (2) buffer strip which requires an area “not less than fifteen (15) feet wide within the sixty-five (65)
foot setback…. and shall be installed and landscaped with dense evergreens, fencing, and/or other
plantings as a screen.”
South boundary: The plan meets this requirement as it includes a > 35ft landscape buffer area along the
South property line. This area already has a very substantial landscape with a robust cedar hedge,
crabapple trees, various hardwood trees, maples and other plantings. (see winter and summer photos
above). In addition, we are including more landscape shrubs including red twig dogwoods, forsythia,
rhododendron, highbush blueberry and two additional red maple trees. There is also existing fencing
that will remain in-place along the property line.
East boundary: The plan meets this requirement as it includes >17 feet from the property line to the
edge of the parking bays. This area also has a very substantial landscape as shown in the photos above.
In addition, we are proposing various understory shrubs including forsythia, rhododendron, and witch
hazel plantings.
Substantial screening is being provided to both the South and East boundaries.. With the exception of
two pines being removed here, all the existing perimeter landscaping is remaining in-place on both the
South and East property lines. As for the southern property, more than double the requirement of the
15ft minimum landscape buffer is provided with dense evergreen cedars, existing fencing and additional
plantings for added buffer screening.
3.18 Energy Standards
All new buildings are subject to the Stretch Energy Code pursuant to Section 3.18: Residential and
Commercial Building Energy Standards of the LDRs. This now includes provision of a solar-ready roof.
19. Staff recommends the Board discuss with the applicant how the roof will comply with the standard.
If the applicant demonstrates satisfactory compliance with this requirement, Staff considers
demonstration of it on the plans can be a condition of approval.
RESPONSE: The building design complies with the Vermont Commercial Building Energy Standards
(CBES) 2020. The roof is designed to meet minimum R-49 insulation with 9+” closed-cell spray foam
between roof rafters. We have designed exterior walls to meet the CBES requirement of R-13 between
studs with an additional R-12ci outside of the studs. The entire slab will have R-10 insulation beneath,
per CBES requirement. We have confirmed with the structural engineer that the roof framing is
adequate to support an additional 5psf for future solar PV if and when desired.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Board work with the applicant to address the issues identified herein.
IPF 1" OD Flush VT 48Metal Playground FenceSewer MH (typ.)UWooden post w/UGP outletUGP Access Cover10" ODWooden PlatformIPF 1" OD Flush VT 48Large Traffic SignpostSpanning Route 7Gas Line inUGP Line inGas Valve (typ.)Wood Fence (typ.)Short Wood Picket Fence (typ.)Sill Elevation218.64'Sill elevation 218.60'Concrete wallsbasement windowsGas Line inHVACWooden post w/UGP outletWooden post w/UGP outletWooden post w/UGP outletWooden post w/UGP outletRoad sign (typ.)Light for sign (UGP)Bus Stop BuildingRaised BedSandpitWooden walkwayWooden PlatformShedWoodenStageDumpstersBulkheadADA Ramp and PorchPorchRaised Bedand SignSill Elevation216.66'PorchCarriage HouseDavis Studio BuildingA-FrameBuildingUX X X
XXXXXXXXXXGas Line inWood Fence (typ.)OHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWEEGASGASGASWWGASEWWWWWWWWWWWEE WWWWGASGASGASR-4 ZONING DISTRICTC-1 R-15 ZONING DISTRICT(PER 2020 LDR)R-4 ZONINGDISTRICTC-1 R-15 ZONINGDISTRICT(PER 2020 LDR)URBAN DESIGNOVERLAY BOUNDARYMAJOR INTERSECTIONOVERLAY BOUNDARYWWWLINDENWOOD DRIVEUS ROUTE 7, SHELBURNE ROAD
IPF 1" OD FlushBlasted TopPainted RedPALMER AND HELEN IRISHSPAN: 600-188-13074PARCEL ID: 1050-00007ALI TAHAMISPAN: 600-188-16033PARCEL ID: 1540-00930BREWER PKWY LLCSPAN: 600-188-13371PARCEL ID: 0260-00002SARAH BRUTZMANSPAN: 600-188-10848PARCEL ID: 0260-00004DS REALTY LLCSPAN: 600-188-14911PARCEL ID: 1540-009161.63 ACRES1.26 ACRES IN C-1 R-15 DISTRICT0.37 ACRES IN R-4 DISTRICT(ACREAGE TOTALS PER 2020 LDR)SSSWWSSSSSPARCEL ID: 1540-00794SPAN: 600-188-14211PARCEL ID: 1050-00002SPAN: 600-188-13165PARCEL ID: 1050-00004ANDREA AND PALMER IRISHSPAN: 600-188-12730PARCEL ID: 1050-00006218218
218
2192192
1
9
207208208209209209209209209209210210211211211211212212213213214214214214214
214214214
21
5 215215
216216
216
21
6
217217 2172
1
7
217
217
2182
1
8 218212211215216209256'281'255'276'SSSURVEY NOTESDEMOLITION SCHEDULELEGENDGENERAL NOTESEXISTING SURFACE LEGENDZONING INFODAVIS STUDIO CARRIAGE HOUSE RENOVATIONSOUTH BURLINGTON, VTC1.1Existing Condition andDemolition Plan26 JANUARY 2022REV 2/28/2022 SOUTH BURLINGTON STAFF COMMENTS
IPF 1" OD Flush VT 48Metal Playground FenceSewer MH (typ.)UWooden post w/UGP outletUGP Access Cover10" ODWooden PlatformIPF 1" OD Flush VT 48Large Traffic SignpostSpanning Route 7Gas Line inUGP Line inGas Valve (typ.)Wood Fence (typ.)Short Wood Picket Fence (typ.)Sill Elevation218.64'Sill elevation 218.60'Concrete wallsbasement windowsGas Line inHVACWooden post w/UGP outletWooden post w/UGP outletWooden post w/UGP outletWooden post w/UGP outletRoad sign (typ.)Light for sign (UGP)Bus Stop BuildingRaised BedSandpitWooden walkwayShedWoodenStageDumpstersBulkheadADA Ramp and PorchPorchRaised Bedand SignSill Elevation216.66'PorchCarriage HouseDavis Studio BuildingA-FrameBuildingUX X X
XXXXXXXXXXGas Line inWood Fence (typ.)OHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWEEGASGASGASWWGASEWWWWWWWWWWWEE WWWWGASGASGASR-4 ZONING DISTRICTC-1 R-15 ZONING DISTRICT(PER 2020 LDR)R-4 ZONINGDISTRICTC-1 R-15 ZONINGDISTRICT(PER 2020 LDR)URBAN DESIGNOVERLAY BOUNDARYMAJOR INTERSECTIONOVERLAY BOUNDARYWWWLINDENWOOD DRIVEUS ROUTE 7, SHELBURNE ROAD
IPF 1" OD FlushBlasted TopPainted RedPALMER AND HELEN IRISHSPAN: 600-188-13074PARCEL ID: 1050-00007ALI TAHAMISPAN: 600-188-16033PARCEL ID: 1540-00930BREWER PKWY LLCSPAN: 600-188-13371PARCEL ID: 0260-00002SARAH BRUTZMANSPAN: 600-188-10848PARCEL ID: 0260-00004DS REALTY LLCSPAN: 600-188-14911PARCEL ID: 1540-009161.63 ACRES1.26 ACRES IN C-1 R-15 DISTRICT0.37 ACRES IN R-4 DISTRICT(ACREAGE TOTALS PER 2020 LDR)SSSWWSSSSSPARCEL ID: 1540-00794SPAN: 600-188-14211PARCEL ID: 1050-00002SPAN: 600-188-13165PARCEL ID: 1050-00004ANDREA AND PALMER IRISHSPAN: 600-188-12730PARCEL ID: 1050-00006218218
218
2192192
1
9
207208208209209209209209209209210210211211211211212212213213214214214214214
214214214
21
5 215215
216216
216
21
6
217217 2172
1
7
217
217
2182
1
8 218212211215216209256'281'255'276'SSDAVIS STUDIO CARRIAGE HOUSE RENOVATIONSOUTH BURLINGTON, VTC1.2Erosion Prevention andSediment Control PlanLEGENDEROSION CONTROL LEGENDEROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES26 JANUARY 2022REV 2/28/2022 SOUTH BURLINGTON STAFF COMMENTS
XXXXProposed Carriage HouseSSSSSSSIPF 1" OD Flush VT 48Metal Playground FenceSewer MH (typ.)UUGP Access Cover10" ODIPF 1" OD Flush VT 48Large Traffic SignpostSpanning Route 7UGP Line inGas Valve (typ.)Wood Fence (typ.)Short Wood Picket Fence (typ.)Concrete wallsbasement windowsGas Line inHVACWooden post w/UGP outletWooden post w/UGP outletWooden post w/UGP outletWooden post w/UGP outletRoad sign (typ.)Light for sign (UGP)Bus Stop BuildingSandpitShedDumpstersBulkheadRaised Bedand SignSill Elevation216.66'PorchDavis Studio BuildingUX
XXWood Fence (typ.)OHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWOHWEEGASGASGASWWGASEWWWWWWWWWWWEE WWWWGASGASGASR-4 ZONING DISTRICTC-1 R-15 ZONING DISTRICT(PER 2020 LDR)R-4 ZONINGDISTRICTC-1 R-15 ZONINGDISTRICT(PER 2020 LDR)URBAN DESIGNOVERLAY BOUNDARYMAJOR INTERSECTIONOVERLAY BOUNDARYWWWLINDENWOOD DRIVEUS ROUTE 7, SHELBURNE ROAD
IPF 1" OD FlushBlasted TopPainted RedPALMER AND HELEN IRISHSPAN: 600-188-13074PARCEL ID: 1050-00007ALI TAHAMISPAN: 600-188-16033PARCEL ID: 1540-00930BREWER PKWY LLCSPAN: 600-188-13371PARCEL ID: 0260-00002SARAH BRUTZMANSPAN: 600-188-10848PARCEL ID: 0260-00004DS REALTY LLCSPAN: 600-188-14911PARCEL ID: 1540-009161.63 ACRES1.26 ACRES IN C-1 R-15 DISTRICT0.37 ACRES IN R-4 DISTRICT(ACREAGE TOTALS PER 2020 LDR)SSSWWSSSSSREXBO DEVELOPMENT INCSPAN: 600-188-15257PARCEL ID: 1540-00794TIMOTHY MCKENZIESPAN: 600-188-14211PARCEL ID: 1050-00002RAYMOND A & PATRICIA L JEWETT TRUSTSPAN: 600-188-13165PARCEL ID: 1050-00004ANDREA AND PALMER IRISHSPAN: 600-188-12730PARCEL ID: 1050-00006SKIPCO INCSPAN: 600-188-15742PARCEL ID: 1540-00907MONRO MUFFLER BRAKE INCSPAN: 600-188-16131PARCEL ID: 1540-00919HANNAFORD BROTHERSSPAN: 600-188-12728PARCEL ID: 1540-935-7
218218
218
219219219207208208209209209209209209209210210211211211211212212
213213214214
214214
21421421
4
2
1
4
21
5 215215
216216
216
21
6
217217 2172
1
7
217
217
21821
8 218212211215216209256'281'255'276'SSLEGENDPROPOSED SURFACE LEGENDPROPOSED SITE FEATURES SCHEDULEDAVIS STUDIO CARRIAGE HOUSE RENOVATIONSOUTH BURLINGTON, VTC2.1Proposed Site PlanZONING INFO26 JANUARY 2022REV 2/28/2022 SOUTH BURLINGTON STAFF COMMENTS
UUGP Access Cover10" ODUGP Line inConcrete wallsbasement windowsGas Line inHVACWooden post w/UGP outletWooden post w/UGP outletWooden post w/UGP outletWooden post w/UGP outletLight for sign (UGP)Wooden PlatformBulkheadRaised Bedand SignSill Elevation216.66'PorchDavis Studio BuildingUX X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXGas Line inOHWOHWOHWOHWOHW
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASWE
E
E
E
E
E E E E E E EEEEEEEEEEEE WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASGASURBAN DESIGNOVERLAY BOUNDARYMAJOR INTERSECTIONOVERLAY BOUNDARYWWWWWWWWWWWWPALMER AND HELEN IRISHPARCEL ID: 1050-00007SSSSSSSSSSWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW218218
218
219208209209209209 210210211211211211212212
213213
21421421
4
2142
1
4
2
1
4
215
216216
217217 2172
1
7
2182
1
8212211215216209 256'
255'SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSWWWXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX
XX
Proposed Carriage HouseIMPERVIOUS SURFACE LEGENDDAVIS STUDIO CARRIAGE HOUSE RENOVATIONSOUTH BURLINGTON, VTC2.3IMPERVIOUS COVERAGESUMMARY26 JANUARY 2022REV 2/28/2022 SOUTH BURLINGTON STAFF COMMENTS
1. ALL DISTURBED SURFACES SHALL BE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN 7 DAYS OFDISTURBANCE.2. SEEDING AND MULCHING OF DISTURBED AREAS SHALL TAKE PLACE WITHIN 48 HOURS OF FINAL GRADING.3. MULCH: TYPICALLY HAY OR STRAW MAY BE UTILIZED AND SHALL BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 90-100 LBS/1,000 SF. MULCHSHALL NOT BE PLACED ON SLOPES OF GREATER THAN 3:1. SEED IMPREGNATED EROSION CONTROL NETTING SHALLBE USED IN ITS PLACE.4. SEED: SEEDING SHALL OCCUR AFTER APRIL 15 AND PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 15TH IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH A STAND OFGRASS PRIOR TO GROUND FREEZING. SEED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SEED SPECIFICATION ON THIS SHEET.5. COVER SEED WITH 14 INCH SOIL UNLESS A HYDROSEEDER IS USED.6. MULCH ANCHORING: SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY DEGRADABLE MULCH NETTING. USE WHEN SLOPES ARE GREATERTHAN 10%.7. TOPSOIL AND MULCHING NOT TO BE APPLIED IN AREAS OF TRAVEL WAYS.SEED AND FERTILIZER (SEE NOTE)NOTES FOR SEEDED AND MULCHED AREASAS NEEDEDSAND/GRAVEL FILLSEEDED AND MULCHED AREAS DETAILMULCH, HAY ORSTRAW (TYP).TOPSOIL. REFER TO LANDSCAPEDRAWINGS FOR DEPTH.FILTER FABRICMIRAFI 500XGRADEFENCE POSTOR EQUALSILT FENCE SHALL BE PRE-FABRICATED EROSION CONTROL FENCE BY MIRAFI OR EQUAL, OR CONSTRUCTED IN PLACEINSPECTION SHALL BE FREQUENT (MINIMUM ONCE A WEEK AND AFTER EVERY RAINFALL). MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PER-FILTER FABRIC TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE FENCE TIES SPACED EVERY 24" AT TOP OF MID SECTION.2'-0" MIN.SILT FENCE NOTES:FOLDED AND STAPLED.CONSTRUCTED IN PLACE SILT FENCE:FORMED AS NEEDED, AND SEDIMENT REMOVED WHEN "BULGES" DEVELOP IN SILT FENCE.WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES OR STAPLES.WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER, THEY SHALL BE OVERLAPPED BY 6", AS SPECIFIED HEREIN.2.3.C.A.B.1.10'-0" MAX.BACKFILLFILTER FABRICMIRAFI 500X8"EMBED 18" MIN.GRADENTSFLOWPOST(14 GA. MIN.)6"X6" WOVEN WIRE FENCESILT FENCE DETAILCONSERVATION MIX GRASS SEED- FOR USE IN ALL OTHER AREASFERTILIZER- 40 LBS. PER 1000S.F.USE STANDARD 10-20-20 WHEN NO SOIL TESTDATA IS AVAILABLESPRING SEEDINGFALL SEEDINGLIME- 100 LBS. PER 1000S.F.DOLOMITIC GROUND LIMESTONENOT LESS THAN 85% OF THE TOTAL CARBONATETOP SOIL6" MINIMUM TOPSOILHAY OR STRAW MULCH- 90-100LBS PER 1000S.F.APPLY BINDER OR NETTING AS NEEDEDURBAN MIX GRASS SEED- FOR USE IN GRASSED LAWN AREAS AROUNDBUILDING AND PARKING% BY WEIGHT LBS. LIVE SEED BY ACRETYPE OF SEED 44.44 20.0CREEPING RED FESCUE 44.44 20.0KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 11.11 5.0RYEGRASS 10045.0 # LIVE SEED/ ACRE% BY WEIGHT LBS. LIVE SEED PER ACRE TYPE OF SEED 50 15.0 SMOOTH BROMEGRASS 16.67 5.0 RYEGRASS 33.33 10.0 BIRDSFOOT TREFOIL 100 30.0 # LIVE SEED/ACREGENERAL NOTES1.THE "ON-SITE EROSION CONTROL PLAN COORDINATOR" SHALL BE PRESENT ON-SITE FROM DAY-TO-DAY, AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THAT THE EROSION CONTROL MEASURESREQUIRED BY THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN, DETAILS AND NOTES, ARE PROPERLY INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED. THE ONSITE EROSION CONTROL PLAN COORDINATOR SHALL KEEP A WRITTENRECORD OF INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF EROSION CONTROL FEATURES. A COPY OF THESE PLANS AND INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE RECORDS SHALL BE KEPT ONSITE AT ALL TIMES.2.EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "VERMONT STANDARDS & SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL", LATESTEDITION AND VERMONT CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT 3-9020.3.DISTURBANCE LIMITS ARE TO BE MARKED, AND THE FOLLOWING MANAGEMENT PRACTICES INSTALLED, PRIOR TO BEGINNING EARTH WORK IN ANY GIVEN AREA; SILT FENCE, CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE AND TREE PROTECTION FENCING.4.THE PERIOD BETWEEN OCTOBER 15TH AND APRIL 15TH IS CONSIDERED THE 'WINTER CONSTRUCTION PERIOD'. A PLAN FOR WINTER CONSTRUCTION MUST BE DEVELOPED BY THE CONTRACTOR,AND SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER AT LEAST 30 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF PROPOSED EARTH DISTURBANCE DURING THIS PERIOD.5.ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE TO BE STABILIZED (TEMPORARY OR FINAL) WITHIN 7 DAYS OF INITIAL DISTURBANCE. AFTER THIS TIME, ANY DISTURBANCE WITHIN THIS WORK AREA MUST BESTABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY, WITH THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS:a.STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED IF WORK IS TO CONTINUE IN THE AREA WITHIN 24 HOURS AND NO PRECIPITATION IS FORECAST DURING THAT PERIOD.b.WORK IS OCCURRING WITHIN A SELF-CONTAINED EXCAVATION, 2 FEET OR MORE IN DEPTH.IN NO CASE SHALL SOIL BE EXPOSED FOR MORE THAN 14 DAYS WITHOUT BEING STABILIZED.6.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DAILY INSPECTION OF THE ADJACENT ROADWAYS FOR OFF-SITE TRACKING OF SOIL MATERIALS. SOIL, STONE, AND DEBRIS FOUND LEAVING THE SITE ARETO BE REMOVED (WHEN FOUND) BY SWEEPING AT THE END OF EACH CONSTRUCTION DAY, OR MORE FREQUENTLY WHEN NEEDED TO PREVENT IMPACTS TO ADJACENT ROADS AND SIDEWALKS.7.IF DEWATERING IS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR MUST UTILIZE SEDIMENT FILTER BAGS (OR ALTERNATE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER) TO PREVENT DISCHARGE OFSEDIMENT-LADEN WATER OFF SITE.TEMPORARY/CONSTRUCTION EROSION CONTROL MEASURES1.THE SMALLEST PRACTICAL AREA OF LAND SHALL BE DISTURBED AT ANY ONE TIME DURING DEVELOPMENT. WHEN LAND IS DISTURBED, THE DISTURBANCE SHALL BE KEPT TO THE SHORTESTPRACTICAL DURATION AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER.2.DUST SHALL BE CONTROLLED WITH WATER DISTRIBUTED BY A TRUCK-MOUNTED SPRAY BAR. CALCIUM CHLORIDE (AASHTO M 144) OR SODIUM CHLORIDE (AASHTO M 143) SHALL BE USED ASDIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.3.SILT FENCES SHALL BE INSTALLED GENERALLY 10 FEET FROM THE BASE OF THE FILL SLOPES, OR AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THESE SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL THE PROJECT SITE HAS BEENSTABILIZED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM BEHIND THE SILT FENCE WHEN IT BECOMES 6 INCHES DEEP AT THE FENCE. THE SILT FENCE WILL BE REPAIRED AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN APROPER SEDIMENT BARRIER.4.EXCAVATED MATERIAL FROM EARTH EXCAVATION AND DITCH DIGGING SHALL BE PLACED ONSITE IN A LOCATION TO BE APPROVED OF BY THE OWNER AND/OR THE ENGINEER OR USED FORPROJECT FILL MATERIAL IF DETERMINED SUITABLE BY THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE.5.STOCKPILED MATERIAL (TOPSOIL, BORROW, ETC.) SHALL HAVE SILT FENCE CONSTRUCTED AROUND THE PERIMETER. THE STOCKPILED MATERIAL SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED AS SOON ASPOSSIBLE TO PREVENT SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION OFF SITE. LOCATE STOCKPILES ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF DISTURBED AREAS, IF POSSIBLE. DURING WINDY CONDITIONS, STOCKPILEDMATERIAL SHALL BE COVERED OR WATERED APPROPRIATELY TO PREVENT WIND EROSION.6.SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SHALL HAVE EROSION CONTROL NETTING INSTALLED TO STABILIZE THE SLOPE AND REDUCE THE EROSION POTENTIAL. NETTING SHALL BE BIODEGRADABLE WITH A 12MONTH LONGEVITY, S150BN AS MANUFACTURED OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. INSTALL NETTING OVER MULCHED SLOPES SO THAT ALL PARTS ARE IN CONTACT WITH THE SOIL AND MULCH. PINNETTING WITH WIRE STAPLES 3 FEET O.C. TO ENSURE FULL BONDING WITH SOIL SURFACE. THE SLOPE SURFACES SHOULD BE LEFT SLIGHTLY ROUGHENED AND NOT SMOOTH. IF LARGE AMOUNTSOF OFFSITE WATER WILL DRAIN OVER THESE SLOPES, TEMPORARY DIVERSION SWALES SHALL BE INSTALLED UP SLOPE UNTIL THE SLOPE VEGETATION STABILIZES.PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL MEASURES1.WHEN FINAL GRADES ARE REACHED IN AN AREA, IT SHALL BE SEEDED AND MULCHED WITHIN 48 HOURS.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTINUED MAINTENANCE OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS, INCLUDING WATERING UNTIL THE AREA IS INSPECTED AND ACCEPTED BY THE OWNEROR ENGINEER.3.AFTER THE SITE IS STABILIZED, REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY MEASURES AND INSTALL PERMANENT VEGETATION ON THE DISTURBED AREAS.4.RE-SEEDING SHALL BE DONE UNTIL ALL AREAS ARE COMPLETELY COVERED WITH A MATURE STRAND OF GRASS. AN AREA SHALL BE CONSIDERED COVERED WHEN THE ENTIRE SURFACECONTAINS A VERDUROUS STAND OF GRASS. AREAS THAT, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER, ARE PREDOMINATELY WEEDS SHALL BE PLOWED UP, FINE GRADED, FERTILIZED AND RE-SEEDED INTHE MANNER SPECIFIED PREVIOUSLY, EXERCISING CAUTION NOT TO CAUSE DAMAGE TO NEW OR EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL.5.ALL STABILIZATION INVOLVING SEEDING IS TO BE COMPLETED BY SEPTEMBER 15TH.EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTESPROTECTION AREA2'-0"1'-0"MIN.KEEP OUTTREE PROTECTIONAREATREE PROTECTION DETAILDAVIS STUDIO CARRIAGE HOUSE RENOVATIONSOUTH BURLINGTON, VTC3.5EPSC Details26 JANUARY 2022REV 2/28/2022 SOUTH BURLINGTON STAFF COMMENTS
X X X X
>>>>>Proposed Carriage House
IPF 1" OD Flush VT 48
Metal Playground Fence
Sewer MH (typ.)
U
UGP Access Cover
10" OD
IPF 1" OD Flush VT 48
Large Traffic Signpost
Spanning Route 7
UGP Line in
Gas Valve (typ.)
Wood Fence
(typ.)
Short Wood Picket Fence (typ.)
Concrete walls
basement windows
Gas Line in
HVAC
Wooden post w/
UGP outlet
Wooden post w/
UGP outlet
Wooden post w/
UGP outlet
Wooden post w/
UGP outlet
Road sign (typ.)
Light for sign (UGP)
Bus Stop Building
Sandpit
Wooden Platform
Shed
Dumpsters
BulkheadRaised Bed
and Sign
Sill Elevation
216.66'Porch Davis Studio Building
U
XXXX X X X X X
XXXXGas Line in
Wood Fence (typ.)
OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW
OHWOHWEEGASGASGASWWGAS
E
W W W W W W W W W W W
EEWWWWGASGASGASR-4 ZONING DISTRICTC-1 R-15 ZONING DISTRICT(PER 2020 LDR)R-4 ZONINGDISTRICTC-1 R-15 ZONINGDISTRICT(PER 2020 LDR)URBAN DESIGNOVERLAY BOUNDARYMAJOR INTERSECTIONOVERLAY BOUNDARYWWWLINDENWOOD DRIVE
US ROUTE 7, SHELBURNE ROADIPF 1" OD Flush
Blasted Top
Painted Red
PALMER AND HELEN IRISH
SPAN: 600-188-13074
PARCEL ID: 1050-00007
ALI TAHAMI
SPAN: 600-188-16033
PARCEL ID: 1540-00930
BREWER PKWY LLC
SPAN: 600-188-13371
PARCEL ID: 0260-00002
SARAH BRUTZMAN
SPAN: 600-188-10848
PARCEL ID: 0260-00004
DS REALTY LLC
SPAN: 600-188-14911
PARCEL ID: 1540-00916
1.63 ACRES
1.26 ACRES IN C-1 R-15 DISTRICT
0.37 ACRES IN R-4 DISTRICT
(ACREAGE TOTALS PER 2020 LDR)SSSWWSSSSS
REXBO DEVELOPMENT INC
SPAN: 600-188-15257
PARCEL ID: 1540-00794
TIMOTHY MCKENZIE
SPAN: 600-188-14211
PARCEL ID: 1050-00002
RAYMOND A & PATRICIA L JEWETT TRUST
SPAN: 600-188-13165
PARCEL ID: 1050-00004
AND
R
E
A
A
N
D
P
A
L
M
E
R
I
R
I
S
H
SPA
N
:
6
0
0
-
1
8
8
-
1
2
7
3
0
PAR
C
E
L
I
D
:
1
0
5
0
-
0
0
0
0
6
218218218219219219207208208209209209209209
209209210210211211
211
211 21221221321321
4
214 214214214 214214214
215215215216216216216217
217217217 217217218
218
2
1
8
212211215216209SS(10) RED TWIG DOGWOOD SHRUBS
(10) RED TWIG DOGWOOD SHRUBS
SNOW STORAGE AREA
(15) DAYLILLY / MULCH BED AREA
(2) WITCH HAZEL SHRUBS
(2) FORSYTHIA SHRUBS
(4) PJM RHODODENDRON
(1) PURPLE LILAC
LAWN
LAWN
EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN
EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN
MULCH BED W/ ±12 LF STEEL EDGE
(6) HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY
DAMAGED A-FRAME BUILDING
REMOVED (SEE CIVIL PANS)
(14) PURPLE CONEFLOWER
SEED AREA
ENTRY
ENTRY
CONC. PAD TYP. (SEE CIVIL)
(2) MUGHO PINE
EXISTING PERIMETER
DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN
(8) PURPLE CONEFLOWER
(1) MUGHO PINE
(1) PURPLE LILAC
EXISTING GRAVEL
PATH TO REMAIN
(7) RED TWIG DOGWOOD SHRUBS
MULCH BED WITH ±52LF STEEL EDGE
EXISTING LANDSCAPE BUFFER3FT X 254FT TO REMAIN.± 40FT X 60FT ENCLOSED PLAY
AREA WITH 4FT HIGH FENCE
(2,400 SF AREA)254.7'CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE ALL
EXISTING TREES DESIGNATED TO
REMAIN THROUGH ENTIRE
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.
CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE ALL
EXISTING TREES DESIGNATED TO
REMAIN THROUGH ENTIRE
CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.
(2) 4FT WIDE GATES
WITH LATCH AND
LOCKING MECHANISM
4FT HIGH BLACK FENCE
(STYLE BY OWNER)
(1) 4FT WIDE GATE WITH
SELF-CLOSING HINGES,
LATCH AND LOCKING
MECHANISM
MAINTAIN ACCESS TO
PLAY AREA
CONCRETE CURB
SEE CIVIL PLANS
(14) BLACK EYED SUSAN
PAVEMENT MARKINGS
SEE CIVIL PLANS
SNOW STORAGE
(3) PURPLE CONEFLOWER
±64 LF STEEL EDGING
(3) PURPLE CONEFLOWER
SPADE EDGE ALL MULCH
BED AREAS TYPICAL
(4) PJM RHODODENDRON
(1) 4FT WIDE GATE WITH
SELF-CLOSING HINGES,
LATCH AND LOCKING
MECHANISM
DAVIS STUDIO C1-R15R-4NOTE: LDR 2022 AMENDMENT
REMOVES R-4 ZONING AND EXTENDS
C1-R15 TO EAST PROPERTY LINE
CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE
EXISTING TREES AS REQUIRED TO
ACCOMMODATE NEW PARKING LOT
DESIGN AND REVISED GRADING
(SEE CIVIL PLAN SHEET C1.1)
CONCRETE WALK
SEE CIVIL PLANS
LAWN AREA
LAWN AREA
NOTE: LAWN AREAS VARY, SEE CIVIL
PLANS FOR LAWN SPECIFICATIONS
(3) FORSYTHIA SHRUBS
(3) FORSYTHIA SHRUBS
(8) RED TWIG DOGWOOD
EXISTING PERIMETER
TREES TO REMAIN
LAWN AREA
PROVIDE NEW FENCING AND
GATE ON NORTH SIDE OF PLAY AREA
(3) BLACK-EYED SUSAN
MULCH BED
MULCH BED AREA
RED MAPLE
RED MAPLE
LP
EXISTING PERIMETER
TREE TO REMAIN
EXISTING PERIMETER
TREES TO REMAIN
RED MAPLE
REDUCE BACK-IN
AREA FROM 24FT WIDE
TO 12FT WIDE AS SHOWN
EXISTING PERIMETER
MAPLE TREE TO REMAINLPLP
LP
LP
LP
18 HIGHBUSH
BLUEBERRY
SHORT TERM BIKE PARKING
EXISTING BIKE RACK
WITH 10 SPACES
LONG TERM BIKE PARKING
AT GROUND LEVEL OF
STAIRWELL AREA (INSIDE BUILDING)
2 SPACES WITH ONE LOCKER
8 HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY
6 FORSYTHIA SHRUBS
LANDSCAPE PLANTING SCHEDULE
NOTE: All plants specified will be of good quality and in compliance with the most recent edition
of ANSI Z60.1 American Standard for Nursery Stock published by AmericanHort.
PURPLE LILAC RED TWIG DOGWOOD IN WINTER FORSYTHIA
WITCHHAZEL RED TWIG DOGWOOD IN SUMMER PJM RHODODENDRON
MUGHO PINE SHRUB
HIGHBUSH BLUEBERRY SHRUB
SHRUB PLANTING IMAGES
LANDSCAPE PLAN
DAVIS STUDIO CARRIAGE HOUSE RENOVATION
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VTL-01 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE
PLAN
LANDSCAPE VALUE
DRAFT CONCEPT
The following table represents the minimum landscape budget requirements per Section 13.04(G).
26 JANUARY 2022 REV 2/28/2022 SOUTH BURLINGTON STAFF COMMENTS
PERIMETER TREES
(2) RED MAPLE TREES
(5) CRABAPPLE TREES
(2) SUGAR MAPLE TREES
(9) TOTAL EXISTING PERIMETER TREES
+ (3) PROPOSED RED MAPLE TREES
(12) GR. TOTAL PERIMETER TREES
44 PARKING SPACES / 5 = 9 MINIMUM TREES REQUIRED
EXISTING
PROPOSED TREE
ARMSTRONG FREEMAN MAPLE
SHORT TERM & LONG TERM BIKE PARKING REQUIREMENTS
PER STAFF COMMENTS
SHORT TERM: 10 SPACES
LONG TERM: 2 SPACES
LOCKERS: 1 PROVIDED
(12" wide X 18" deep X 36" high)
PROVIDED:
IPF 1" OD Flush VT 48
Metal Playground Fence
Sewer MH (typ.)
U
UGP Access Cover
10" OD
IPF 1" OD Flush VT 48
Large Traffic Signpost
Spanning Route 7
UGP Line in
Gas Valve (typ.)
Wood Fence
(typ.)
Short Wood Picket Fence (typ.)
Concrete walls
basement windows
Gas Line in
HVAC
Wooden post w/
UGP outlet
Wooden post w/
UGP outlet
Wooden post w/
UGP outlet
Wooden post w/
UGP outlet
Road sign (typ.)
Light for sign (UGP)
Bus Stop Building
Sandpit
Shed
Dumpsters
BulkheadRaised Bed
and Sign
Sill Elevation
216.66'Porch Davis Studio Building
U
XXXX X X X X X
XXXXGas Line in
Wood Fence (typ.)
OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW OHW
OHWOHWEEGASGASGASWWGAS
E
W W W W W W W W W W W
EEWWWWGASGASGASR-4 ZONING DISTRICTC-1 R-15 ZONING DISTRICT(PER 2020 LDR)R-4 ZONINGDISTRICTC-1 R-15 ZONINGDISTRICT(PER 2020 LDR)URBAN DESIGNOVERLAY BOUNDARYMAJOR INTERSECTIONOVERLAY BOUNDARYWWWLINDENWOOD DRIVE
US ROUTE 7, SHELBURNE ROADIPF 1" OD Flush
Blasted Top
Painted Red
PALMER AND HELEN IRISH
SPAN: 600-188-13074
PARCEL ID: 1050-00007
ALI TAHAMI
SPAN: 600-188-16033
PARCEL ID: 1540-00930
BREWER PKWY LLC
SPAN: 600-188-13371
PARCEL ID: 0260-00002
SARAH BRUTZMAN
SPAN: 600-188-10848
PARCEL ID: 0260-00004
DS REALTY LLC
SPAN: 600-188-14911
PARCEL ID: 1540-00916
1.63 ACRES
1.26 ACRES IN C-1 R-15 DISTRICT
0.37 ACRES IN R-4 DISTRICT
(ACREAGE TOTALS PER 2020 LDR)SSSWWSSSSS
REXBO DEVELOPMENT INC
SPAN: 600-188-15257
PARCEL ID: 1540-00794
TIMOTHY MCKENZIE
SPAN: 600-188-14211
PARCEL ID: 1050-00002
RAYMOND A & PATRICIA L JEWETT TRUST
SPAN: 600-188-13165
PARCEL ID: 1050-00004
AND
R
E
A
A
N
D
P
A
L
M
E
R
I
R
I
S
H
SPA
N
:
6
0
0
-
1
8
8
-
1
2
7
3
0
PAR
C
E
L
I
D
:
1
0
5
0
-
0
0
0
0
6
218218218219219
219207208208209209209209209
209209210210211211
211
211 21221221321321
4
214 214214214
214
214214
215215215216216216216217
217217217 217217218
218
21
8
212211215216209256'281'255'276'SS30" SUGAR MAPLE
32" SUGAR MAPLE
42" MAPLE (OFF PROPERTY)
16" MAPLE
20" MAPLE
PINES TO
BE REMOVED X
X
XX
X
X
14" PINE
24" MAPLE
PINES TO BE
REMOVED
18" MAPLE
WHITE CEDARS
WHITE CEDARS
16" PINE
10" SPRUCE
20" MAPLE
16" HEMLOCK
WHITE CEDARS
24" FIR
12" + 12" CLUMP DOUBLE HEMLOCK
12" HEMLOCK
WHITE
CEDARS
14" HEMLOCK
18" LARCH
6" CLUMP
RIVER BIRCH
6" CLUMP
RIVER BIRCH
20" PIN OAK
5" MAPLE4" MAPLE
8" HEMLOCK
16" HEMLOCK
10" CRABAPPLE
8" CRABAPPLE 6" CLUMP
CRABAPPLE
6" CLUMP
CRABAPPLE
WHITE CEDARS WHITE CEDARS
16" MAPLE (OFF PROPERTY)
14" MAPLE 8" BEECH (OFF PROPERTY)
8" MAPLE (OFF PROPERTY)
TREE PROTECTION
BEGIN / END TREE
PROTECTION
BEGIN / END TREE
PROTECTION
BEGIN / END TREE
PROTECTION
BEGIN / END TREE
PROTECTION
TREE PROTECTION
29"
32"
31"
30"
28"
25"
4" CRABAPPLE
PTPT
PT PT PT PT
PT
PT
PT
EXISTING CEDARS
ARE ±15FT WIDE
EXISTING TREE PLAN
DAVIS STUDIO CARRIAGE HOUSE RENOVATION
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT
26 JANUARY 2022 REV 2/28/2022 SOUTH BURLINGTON STAFF COMMENTS
L-03 EXISTING TREE
PLAN
DRAFT
EXISTING TREE PLAN
The following plan represents the current conditions
(prior to construction) with identification of type,
location, and size of existing trees 6 inches or greater
in caliper, Including 6 trees designated for removal.
SITE PHOTOS EXISTING TREES
North side - White Cedar hedge North side - View East (trees to remain)
ARBORIST RECOMMENDATIONS
Please see arborist report (separate attachment). The only trees designated for removal as part of the project are all mature
pines (#1, #2, #3, #4, #6 and #7) shown. The canopy of the mature pines begins approximately 18ft to 20ft high (see photo)
South side - Existing crabapple and cedarSouth side - Existing Vegetation to remain
South side - Trees along property line East side - Trees behind Carriage House
FORMER TREE DAMAGE
Former Pine Tree damage to A-Frame bldg.
Former Pine Tree damage to A-Frame bldg.
Former Pine Tree damage to A-Frame bldg.
Longevity of White Pines: As White Pines mature branch drop is common in the pine family. Especially when White Pines are
grouped closely together, or in a windbreak ,it is common for these competing trees to loose their lower branches as they age.
PT
PERIMETER TREES
(2) RED MAPLE TREES
(5) CRABAPPLE TREES
(2) SUGAR MAPLE TREES
(9) TOTAL