HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda - Climate Action Plan Task Force - 02/10/2022 Climate Action Plan Task Force
180 Market Street
South Burlington, VT 05403
(802) 846-4106
www.sbvt.gov
Meeting Thursday, February 10, 2022
City Hall, 180 Market Street, Room 301 and Online
7:00 pm
This meeting will be held both in person and digitally via Zoom. Participation Options:
In person: South Burlington City Hall Room 301, 180 Market Street
Assisted Listening Service Available; reach out to staff before meeting begins
Interactive Online (audio & video): https://zoom.us/j/94853335347
Telephone (audio only): (929) 205 6099 Meeting ID: 948 5333 5347
AGENDA:
1. Instructions on existing building in case of emergency and review of technology options – Paul Conner,
Director of Planning & Zoning (7:00 pm)
2. Agenda: Additions, deletions or changes in order of agenda items
3. Open to the public for items not related to the agenda
4. *Review and finalize structure of Pathways and Actions worksheet
5. *Begin review of Pathways & Actions, by Sector, beginning with building / thermal
6. *Evaluating equity of Pathways and Actions in the context of the Climate Action Plan
7. *Minutes: January 26, 2022
8. Other Business
9. Adjourn (8:55 pm)
*Item has attachments
Respectfully submitted,
Paul Conner, AICP,
Paul Conner, AICP
Director of Planning & Zoning
Chief Sustainability Officer
180 Market Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sb vt.gov
MEMORANDUM
TO: South Burlington Climate Action Plan Task Force
FROM: Paul Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning & Chief Sustainability Officer
SUBJECT: February 10 Task Force Meeting Cover memo
Hi folks. Enclosed is this week’s packet.
1. Instructions on existing building in case of emergency and review of technology options – Paul Conner,
Director of Planning & Zoning (7:00 pm)
2. Agenda: Additions, deletions or changes in order of agenda items
3. Open to the public for items not related to the agenda
4. *Review and finalize structure of Pathways and Actions worksheet
Following last week’s meeting, City and CCRPC staff met with Ethan and Andrew put together a game plan
for how the Task Force can best review and provide direction on the Goals, Pathways, and Actions, which
are the heart of the Climate Action Plan.
The staff/leadership group felt it important to make sure the structure of the Goals, Pathways, and Actions
was correct first. Enclosed you’ll find a memo from Ann Janda and an updated Worksheet. The updated
worksheet tries to better clarify what’s a goal, what’s a pathway, and what’s an action, and then charts key
information for each action. Some of the information won’t be known until later in the process.
Task Force Homework: Please review the structure. Does this capture the high-level information and
direction that Task Force members want to make sure are in this Principal Climate Action Plan? Is anything
unclear? What’s missing? Feedback in advance is welcome! [Send to Paul by Wednesday at 3 pm if you’d like
for staff to share it with the rest of the group]
Discussion format: Members are invited to provide feedback on changes. As noted above, feedback in
advance is welcome.
Meeting objective: finalize and approve format/structure of the Goals, Pathways, and Actions Worksheet
5. *Begin review of Pathways & Actions, by Sector, beginning with Building / Thermal
Following completion of the Worksheet format, the next item will be to begin a specific review of the
proposed actions.
Task Force Homework: Understanding that this is a FIRST CUT, please review the Building / Thermal Sector
(items 23-32 on the worksheet). What would you add? Remove? Change? Want Clarity On? Input is
welcome either in writing or orally at the meeting. [Provide any written notes to Paul by Wednesday at 3 pm
if you’d like it shared with the group]
Discussion Format:
- To start the discussion, each member will be invited to share their thoughts / questions / ideas, one at a
time, for up to 3 minutes each.
- After that, members are invited to have a dialogue together. This will be for about 20-30 minutes. The
goal here is to review possible pathways / actions. We ask that members try not to go into the weeds on
any single topic – use the worksheet as a guide (for example, if there is an important obstacle to
2
implementing an action you support, please feel free to identify that an outside entity is needed to
make it happen, and/or that there will be a feasibility challenge created by XYZ, but try not to go into
the specifics/solutions).
Meeting objective: After this discussion, the Task Force can evaluate how this approach worked. Did the Task
Force come to a consensus? Will breakout groups be needed? Should a guided discussion of the whole
group continue at the next meeting? Should this approach be repeated for the other Sectors?
6. *Evaluating equity of Pathways and Actions in the context of the Climate Action Plan
Brief introduction of this topic as included in the prior packet. The overall purpose is to make sure, from the
start, that pathways and actions are being considered for their impacts and opportunities for equitable
implementation. This is an iterative process, and the answers don’t need to be known up front, but
consideration of the subject can be baked in from the start.
7. *Minutes: January 26, 2022
Draft enclosed
8. Other Business
9. Adjourn (8:55 pm)
1
Date: February 3, 2022
TO: Paul Conner, South Burlington Planning Director, and the South Burlington
Climate Action Plan Task Force
FROM: Ann Janda, Senior Energy Project Manager, CCRPC, Melanie Needle, Senior
Planner, CCRPC
RE: Revised Goals, Pathways, and Actions Worksheet
At its January 26 meeting, the Climate Action Plan Task Force requested additional clarity
regarding the sample of potential pathways and actions presented by CCRPC. To accommodate
this request, a new pathways and actions worksheet was developed. This version of potential
climate change pathways and actions now includes goals and additional decision tools.
The draft goals included in the worksheet were informed by the State’s Climate Action Plan and
Comprehensive Energy Plans. The goals from these two plans were added in as reference.
Additionally, the addition of draft goals was included to create a connection to the City’s 2017
Climate Pledge whereby the city pledged to meet the targets of the State of Vermont and of the
Paris Climate Accord. The State’s Global Warming Solutions Act (GWSA) has since been adopted
and its requirements meet or exceed the Paris Climate Accord. Therefore, the GWSA took the
place of the Paris Climate Accord in the worksheet.
The first row of the worksheet includes the definitions for each column. Using these definitions,
some of the pathways were edited. However, the list of sample actions remains largely the
same. Tab 2 includes a link to the State of Vermont Climate Action Plan Equity Rubric . Tab 3
provides high level greenhouse gas reductions modeling for Vermont as a starting point until
each priority action item is individually modeled.
This worksheet is intended only as a place to start discussions among members about potential
goals, pathways and actions for South Burlington and is not intended to be a prescriptive list.
The next step is for task force members to approve (or approve with amendments) this
worksheet format.
After that, the task force should review this list and make recommendations for keeping, editing,
deleting, and/or adding goals, pathways, and actions in each sector and create a prioritized list
for modeling.
110 West Canal Street, Suite 202
Winooski, Vermont 05404-2109
802-846-4490
www.ccrpcvt.org
DRAFT Climate Action Plan Pathways and Action Worksheet 2/3/2022
ID
https://anr.vermont.go
v/content/vermont-
climate-council-adopts-
vermont-climate-
action-plan
https://publicservice.vermon
t.gov/content/2022-plan
The high level desired result informed by the
CAP AND CEP goals.
A pathway is a high-level
means of achieving GHG
emissions reductions or
adaptation goals.
Data point to measure; as a
second step a target may be
established where possible
based on emissions modeling.
Actions are the “operational” tasks the City
will undertake to meet the pathways and
strategies. Actions may be written around
existing — or propose new — policies,
programs, projects, initiatives, plans, etc.
Committees or
staff
responsible for
taking action.
Likelihood that all of
the actions under a
particular goal
taken together will
achieve the goal.
Can we meet the goal
given the potential
obstacles?
Yes, No or Not
Yet?
Will the action result in GHG reductions directly
or indirectly? See high level reductions by sector
in tab 3. For exampl,educational actions are
important but dont result in a direct
measureable impact. Increases in registered
EVs do result in a measurable impact.
HOLD ON THIS
UNTIL HAVE
PRIORITIZED
LIST
HOLD ON
THIS UNTIL
HAVE
PRIORITIZED
LIST
HOLD ON THIS
UNTIL HAVE
PRIORITIZED
LIST
VT CAP/Sector VT Climate Action Plan &
Global Warming
Solutions Act
Requirements
VT Comprehensive Energy Plan
Goals
DRAFT South Burlington Goal Draft Pathway Metric for periodic montioring DRAFT Action Leaders Likelihood %Feasibility %Does the City
have authority
GHG Redutions Estimated GHG
Reduction from
Actions
Equity Rating Cost?
1 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
By 2035 all car sales will be
zero emissions, Meet 10% of
energy needs from
renewable energy by 2025,
and 45% by 2040
Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Light-Duty Vehicle
Electrification
# of electric vehicles
registered annually
Educate student drivers about electric
and high efficiency transportation
options.
School
District,
Consultant
2 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
By 2035 all car sales will be
zero emissions, Meet 10% of
energy needs from
renewable energy by 2025,
and 45% by 2040
Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Light-Duty Vehicle
Electrification
# of electric vehicles
registered annually
Promote EV education and buyer
assistance support currently being
offered by Drive Electric Vermont.
Energy
Committee
3 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
By 2035 all car sales will be
zero emissions, Meet 10% of
energy needs from
renewable energy by 2025,
and 45% by 2040
Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Light-Duty Vehicle
Electrification
# of electric vehicles
registered annually
Develop a toolkit to support existing
multifamily properties installing electric
vehicle charging installations
P&Z,
Consultant
4 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
By 2035 all car sales will be
zero emissions, Meet 10% of
energy needs from
renewable energy by 2025,
and 45% by 2040
Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Light-Duty Vehicle
Electrification
# of electric vehicles
registered annually
Adopt a policy to require all new
buildings be built with electric vehicle
charging equipment
P&Z
5 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
By 2035 all car sales will be
zero emissions, Meet 10% of
energy needs from
renewable energy by 2025,
and 45% by 2040
Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Light-Duty Vehicle
Electrification
# of electric vehicles
registered annually
Develop a toolkit to support existing
commercial buildings installing electric
vehicle charging installations
P&Z,
Consultant
6 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
By 2035 all car sales will be
zero emissions, Meet 10% of
energy needs from
renewable energy by 2025,
and 45% by 2040
Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Light-Duty Vehicle
Electrification
# of electric vehicles
registered annually
Other actions?
7 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
By 2035 all car sales will be
zero emissions, Meet 10% of
energy needs from
renewable energy by 2025,
and 45% by 2040
Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Shift heavy duty vehicles
to zero emissions
% of heavy duty vehicles
replaced with lower carbon
fuels
Determine strategy and budget for
municipal vehicles and equipment to
replace with lower carbon alternatives.
Consider having VTCCC conduct a free
fleet analysis.
City Council,
PW, City
Manager
8 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
By 2035 all car sales will be
zero emissions, Meet 10% of
energy needs from
renewable energy by 2025,
and 45% by 2040
Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Shift heavy duty vehicles
to zero emissions
% of heavy duty vehicles
replaced with lower carbon
fuels
Conduct an annual accounting of fossil
fuel data for municipal fleet vehicles
PW
9 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
By 2035 all car sales will be
zero emissions, Meet 10% of
energy needs from
renewable energy by 2025,
and 45% by 2040
Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Shift heavy duty vehicles
to zero emissions
% of heavy duty vehicles
replaced with lower carbon
fuels
Budget for annual EVSE installments at
various City departments.
City
Manager/City
Council
10 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
By 2035 all car sales will be
zero emissions, Meet 10% of
energy needs from
renewable energy by 2025,
and 45% by 2040
Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Shift heavy duty vehicles
to zero emissions
% of heavy duty vehicles
replaced with lower carbon
fuels
Other actions?
11 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
No specific goal stated in CEP Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Reduce single occupancy
vehicle driving.
VMT, miles of bike/ped
infrastructure
Support micro-transit pilot programs City Manager
12 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
No specific goal stated in CEP Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Reduce single occupancy
vehicle driving.
VMT, miles of bike/ped
infrastructure
Support telecommuting for city
government employees
City Manager
City of South Burlington
Page 1 of 6
DRAFT Climate Action Plan Pathways and Action Worksheet 2/3/2022
13 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
No specific goal stated in CEP Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Reduce single occupancy
vehicle driving.
VMT, miles of bike/ped
infrastructure
Partner with CATMA to provide
telecommuting options to employers in
the City.
City Manager
14 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
No specific goal stated in CEP Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Reduce single occupancy
vehicle driving.
VMT, miles of bike/ped
infrastructure
Partner with Green Mountain Transit
Authority to increase transit ridership on
existing routes and identify new routes.
Ensure there is a shelter at every bus
stop.
City Manager
15 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
No specific goal stated in CEP Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Reduce single occupancy
vehicle driving.
VMT, miles of bike/ped
infrastructure
Maintain existing bike/ped infrastructure
to ensure it can be utilized during all
seasons
City Manager,
PW, P+Z
16 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
No specific goal stated in CEP Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Reduce single occupancy
vehicle driving.
VMT, miles of bike/ped
infrastructure
Increase bike/ped infrastructure city
wide and ensure the bike/ped system is
well connected to facilitate efficient
travel.
PW, P+Z
17 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
No specific goal stated in CEP Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Reduce single occupancy
vehicle driving.
VMT, miles of bike/ped
infrastructure
Establish park & ride/carpool lots to
connect with public transportation, (e.g.
I-189 Exit)
City Manager
PW P+Z
18 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
No specific goal stated in CEP Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Reduce single occupancy
vehicle driving.
VMT, miles of bike/ped
infrastructure
Periodic Open Streets event (perhaps
closing northbound lane of Dorset Street
and/or Market Street)
City Manager
PW P+Z
Recreation
Communication
s
19 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
No specific goal stated in CEP Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Reduce single occupancy
vehicle driving.
VMT, miles of bike/ped
infrastructure
Showcase bike path with an annual event
(marathon/half marathon/5k)
City Manager
PW P+Z
Recreation
Communication
s
20 Transportation By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
No specific goal stated in CEP Reduce ghg emissions from the
transportation sector to achieve an 80%
ghg emissions reduction from 1990 levels
by 2050 (and earlier benchmarks in state
policy).
Reduce single occupancy
vehicle driving.
VMT, miles of bike/ped
infrastructure
Other actions?
21 Buildings/Thermal By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Increasing renewable
thermal and process supply
to 30% by 2025, increasing to
45% by 2032 and 70% by
2042. CEP target to achieve
net-zero ready construction
for all newly constructed
buildings by
2030
Use less energy in buildings and reduce
ghg emissions from buildings to achieve
an 80% ghg emissions reduction from
1990 levels by 2050 (and earlier
benchmarks in state policy).
Reduce energy use in
existing buildings
Number of educational
events
Conduct educational efforts 2 times per
year with specific outreach to low-
income residents to educate city
residents and businesses about programs
offered by Efficiency Vermont, VT GAS,
Champlain Valley Weatherization, Green
Mountain Power, and the Vermont
Green Building Network.
City Council
City Manager
Communicatio
ns
22 Buildings/Thermal By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Increasing renewable
thermal and process supply
to 30% by 2025, increasing to
45% by 2032 and 70% by
2042. CEP target to achieve
net-zero ready construction
for all newly constructed
buildings by
2030
Use less energy in buildings and reduce
ghg emissions from buildings to achieve
an 80% ghg emissions reduction from
1990 levels by 2050 (and earlier
benchmarks in state policy).
Reduce energy use in
existing buildings
Number of events Facilitate one workshop annually and
conduct building walk-throughs for
owners and tenants of rental housing to
encourage implementation of energy
efficiency measures.
Energy
Comm.
23 Buildings/Thermal By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Increasing renewable
thermal and process supply
to 30% by 2025, increasing to
45% by 2032 and 70% by
2042. CEP target to achieve
net-zero ready construction
for all newly constructed
buildings by
2030
Use less energy in buildings and reduce
ghg emissions from buildings to achieve
an 80% ghg emissions reduction from
1990 levels by 2050 (and earlier
benchmarks in state policy).
Reduce energy use in
existing buildings
# of buildings weatherized Develop program similar to the
FAA/Chamberlain program to weatherize
low-moderate income households
Energy
Comm.
Page 2 of 6
DRAFT Climate Action Plan Pathways and Action Worksheet 2/3/2022
24 Buildings/Thermal By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Increasing renewable
thermal and process supply
to 30% by 2025, increasing to
45% by 2032 and 70% by
2042. CEP target to achieve
net-zero ready construction
for all newly constructed
buildings by
2030
Use less energy in buildings and reduce
ghg emissions from buildings to achieve
an 80% ghg emissions reduction from
1990 levels by 2050 (and earlier
benchmarks in state policy).
Reduce energy use in
existing buildings
# of buildings weatherized The City should work with Efficiency
Vermont and landlords to target
weatherization actions in low income
and multi-unit housing (learning from
Burlington’s program with BED)
Energy
Comm.
25 Buildings/Thermal By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Increasing renewable
thermal and process supply
to 30% by 2025, increasing to
45% by 2032 and 70% by
2042. CEP target to achieve
net-zero ready construction
for all newly constructed
buildings by
2030
Use less energy in buildings and reduce
ghg emissions from buildings to achieve
an 80% ghg emissions reduction from
1990 levels by 2050 (and earlier
benchmarks in state policy).
Reduce energy use in
existing buildings
Consider joining with Burlington in
becoming a 2030 District
https://www.2030districts.org/
City Council
26 Buildings/Thermal By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Increasing renewable
thermal and process supply
to 30% by 2025, increasing to
45% by 2032 and 70% by
2042. CEP target to achieve
net-zero ready construction
for all newly constructed
buildings by
2030
Use less energy in buildings and reduce
ghg emissions from buildings to achieve
an 80% ghg emissions reduction from
1990 levels by 2050 (and earlier
benchmarks in state policy).
Reduce energy use in
existing buildings
Other actions?
27 Buildings/Thermal By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Increasing renewable
thermal and process supply
to 30% by 2025, increasing to
45% by 2032 and 70% by
2042. CEP target to achieve
net-zero ready construction
for all newly constructed
buildings by
2030
Use less energy in buildings and reduce
ghg emissions from buildings to achieve
an 80% ghg emissions reduction from
1990 levels by 2050 (and earlier
benchmarks in state policy).
Net-zero for new
construction
Annual electricity
consumption, annual
natural gas consumption
Establish and adopt a building code
pursuant to Title 24, Chapter 59 so the
City of South Burlington has the
authority to regulate the thermal fuel
source of new buildings.
City Council
City Manager
P+Z
28 Buildings/Thermal By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Increasing renewable
thermal and process supply
to 30% by 2025, increasing to
45% by 2032 and 70% by
2042. CEP target to achieve
net-zero ready construction
for all newly constructed
buildings by
2030
Use less energy in buildings and reduce
ghg emissions from buildings to achieve
an 80% ghg emissions reduction from
1990 levels by 2050 (and earlier
benchmarks in state policy).
Net-zero for new
construction
Annual electricity
consumption, annual
natural gas consumption
Develop a mechanism to charge a fee to
developers connecting to natural gas and
dedicate the funds collected to
weatherize and cold climate heat pumps
for low and moderate income.
City Council
City Manager
29 Buildings/Thermal By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Increasing renewable
thermal and process supply
to 30% by 2025, increasing to
45% by 2032 and 70% by
2042. CEP target to achieve
net-zero ready construction
for all newly constructed
buildings by
2030
Use less energy in buildings and reduce
ghg emissions from buildings to achieve
an 80% ghg emissions reduction from
1990 levels by 2050 (and earlier
benchmarks in state policy).
Net-zero for new
construction
Other actions?
30 Buildings/Thermal By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Increasing renewable
thermal and process supply
to 30% by 2025, increasing to
45% by 2032 and 70% by
2042. CEP target to achieve
net-zero ready construction
for all newly constructed
buildings by
2030
Use less energy in buildings and reduce
ghg emissions from buildings to achieve
an 80% ghg emissions reduction from
1990 levels by 2050 (and earlier
benchmarks in state policy).
Switch out fossil fuel
heating and cooling
systems
Number of wood stoves
replaced
Promote wood stove change-out
programs that take older non-EPA
certified stoves out of service and
replace them with more efficient and
lower emitting models.
Energy
Comm.
31 Buildings/Thermal By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Increasing renewable
thermal and process supply
to 30% by 2025, increasing to
45% by 2032 and 70% by
2042. CEP target to achieve
net-zero ready construction
for all newly constructed
buildings by
2030
Use less energy in buildings and reduce
ghg emissions from buildings to achieve
an 80% ghg emissions reduction from
1990 levels by 2050 (and earlier
benchmarks in state policy).
Switch out fossil fuel
heating and cooling
systems
# of cold climate heat
pumps
Targeted outreach to neighborhoods
which rely on delivered fuels to educate
them on transitioning to cold climate
heat pumps
Energy Comm.
Page 3 of 6
DRAFT Climate Action Plan Pathways and Action Worksheet 2/3/2022
32 Buildings/Thermal By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Increasing renewable
thermal and process supply
to 30% by 2025, increasing to
45% by 2032 and 70% by
2042. CEP target to achieve
net-zero ready construction
for all newly constructed
buildings by
2030
Use less energy in buildings and reduce
ghg emissions from buildings to achieve
an 80% ghg emissions reduction from
1990 levels by 2050 (and earlier
benchmarks in state policy).
Switch out fossil fuel
heating and cooling
systems
Other actions?
33 Renewable Energy
(Not in State CAP, in
CEP)
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Meet 25% of energy needs
from renewable sources by
2025, 45% by 2035, and 90%
by 2050.Electric sector to be
fully decarbonized and at
least 75% renewable by
2032.
Increase renewable energy generation to
meet state goal of 90% of energy needs
met by renewable sources by 2050.
Increase renewable energy
generation in South
Burlington
Amount of renewable
energy generated annually
Adopt a policy to require all new
buildings to be built with solar net
metered systems/paired with energy
storage
City Council
City Manager
P+z
34 Renewable Energy
(Not in State CAP, in
CEP)
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Meet 25% of energy needs
from renewable sources by
2025, 45% by 2035, and 90%
by 2050.Electric sector to be
fully decarbonized and at
least 75% renewable by
2032.
Increase renewable energy generation to
meet state goal of 90% of energy needs
met by renewable sources by 2050.
Increase renewable energy
generation in South
Burlington
Amount of renewable
energy generated annually
Create a program to incentivize residents
and businesses to install solar arrays on
their roofs, over parking lots, or as
appropriate as free-standing structures
Planning
Commission
35 Renewable Energy
(Not in State CAP, in
CEP)
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Meet 25% of energy needs
from renewable sources by
2025, 45% by 2035, and 90%
by 2050.Electric sector to be
fully decarbonized and at
least 75% renewable by
2032.
Increase renewable energy generation to
meet state goal of 90% of energy needs
met by renewable sources by 2050.
Increase renewable energy
generation in South
Burlington
Amount of renewable
energy generated annually
Install solar on City Center (is this complete?)City Council
City Manager
PW
36 Renewable Energy
(Not in State CAP, in
CEP)
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Meet 25% of energy needs
from renewable sources by
2025, 45% by 2035, and 90%
by 2050.Electric sector to be
fully decarbonized and at
least 75% renewable by
2032.
Increase renewable energy generation to
meet state goal of 90% of energy needs
met by renewable sources by 2050.
Increase renewable energy
generation in South
Burlington
Amount of renewable
energy generated annually
Install solar and water turbine in wastewater
treatment plant
City Manager,
PW
37 Renewable Energy
(Not in State CAP, in
CEP)
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Meet 25% of energy needs
from renewable sources by
2025, 45% by 2035, and 90%
by 2050.Electric sector to be
fully decarbonized and at
least 75% renewable by
2032.
Increase renewable energy generation to
meet state goal of 90% of energy needs
met by renewable sources by 2050.
Increase renewable energy
generation in South
Burlington
Amount of renewable
energy generated annually
The City shall continue to lead the
community by increasing its renewable
energy production and battery storage
portfolio of municipal buildings.
City Council
City Manager
PW
38 Renewable Energy
(Not in State CAP, in
CEP)
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Meet 25% of energy needs
from renewable sources by
2025, 45% by 2035, and 90%
by 2050.Electric sector to be
fully decarbonized and at
least 75% renewable by
2032.
Increase renewable energy generation to
meet state goal of 90% of energy needs
met by renewable sources by 2050.
Increase renewable energy
generation in South
Burlington
Amount of renewable
energy generated annually
The City and the School District should
work together to maximize allowable
solar Net Metered generation, with the
additional 1MW allowed for schools.
City Council
City Manager
PW School
District
39 Land Use
(UnderAdaptation and
Resilience in CAP,
included in CEP)
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
There is no specific goal for
land use in the CEP
Reduce emissions and increase carbon
storage and resilience via Land Use
Regulations
Change land use policies so
current and future land
development will be
adaptive and resilient to
climate change impacts
# of landuse policies
changed or added
Protect identified habitat blocks critical for
carbon storage.
Planning
Commission
P+Z
40 Land Use
(UnderAdaptation and
Resilience in CAP,
included in CEP)
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
There is no specific goal for
land use in the CEP
Reduce emissions and increase carbon
storage and resilience via Land Use
Regulations
Change land use policies so
current and future land
development will be
adaptive and resilient to
climate change impacts
# of landuse policies
changed or added
Remove parking minimums and establish
parking maximums where feasible
Planning
Commission
P+Z
41 Land Use
(UnderAdaptation and
Resilience in CAP,
included in CEP)
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
There is no specific goal for
land use in the CEP
Reduce emissions and increase carbon
storage and resilience via Land Use
Regulations
Change land use policies so
current and future land
development will be
adaptive and resilient to
climate change impacts
# of landuse policies
changed or added
Establish a system for disclosure of
residential home energy efficiency
ratings
Planning
Commission
P+Z
42 Land Use
(UnderAdaptation and
Resilience in CAP,
included in CEP)
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
There is no specific goal for
land use in the CEP
Reduce emissions and increase carbon
storage and resilience via Land Use
Regulations
Change land use policies so
current and future land
development will be
adaptive and resilient to
climate change impacts
# of landuse policies
changed or added
Maintain current levels of vegetation in
the built environment through a tree
ordinance and green roofs
Planning
Commission
P+Z City
Council
Page 4 of 6
DRAFT Climate Action Plan Pathways and Action Worksheet 2/3/2022
43 Land Use
(UnderAdaptation and
Resilience in CAP,
included in CEP)
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
There is no specific goal for
land use in the CEP
Reduce emissions and increase carbon
storage and resilience via Land Use
Regulations
At least 30% of new
housing units within ¼ mile
of high-frequency transit
are designated affordable.
# of affordable housing units
built each year with ¼ of
transit routes
Evaluate the density standards in the land
development regulations to increase
affordable housing at densities necessary
for providing reliable transit options that are
more efficient and produce less GHG
emissions.
Planning
Commission
P+Z
44 Non-Energy Sector
(Waste)
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
There is no specific goal for
waste in the CEP
Reduce emissions from waste by X% by
2030
Reduce emissions and
energy at the City’s
wastewater facilities by X%
by 2035
% of emissions annually from
wastewater treatment
Energy consumption from
wastewater treatment
Reduce Fugitive Emissions from
Wastewater Treatment Facilities
City Manager
PW
45 Non-Energy Sector
(Waste)
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
There is no specific goal for
waste in the CEP
Reduce emissions from waste by X% by
2031
Reduce solid waste by X%
by 2035
Tonnage of solid waste Collaborate with Chittenden Solid Waste
District to reduce municipal and
construction waste
PW
CSWD
46 Govt Operations (not
in VT CAP)
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
There is no specific goal for
government operations in
the CEP
All city equipment to be powered by low
carbon fuels by 2035
All city equipment to be
powered by low carbon
fuels by 2035
# of carbon free equipment
replacements per year
Develop a plan to replace mowers, leaf
blowers, snow blowers and other
equipment with electric models.
City Manager
PW
47 Adaptation and
Resilience
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Not applicable to CEP Need to review All Hazard Mitigation
Plan
Need to review All Hazard
Mitigation Plan
N/A ?Protect river corridors and limit
development in vulnerable areas
Planning
Commission
P+Z
48 Adaptation and
Resilience
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Not applicable to CEP Need to review All Hazard Mitigation
Plan
Need to review All Hazard
Mitigation Plan
N/A ?Implement green infrastructure
principles into the built environment
Planning
Commission
P+Z
49 Adaptation and
Resilience
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Not applicable to CEP Need to review All Hazard Mitigation
Plan
Need to review All Hazard
Mitigation Plan
N/A ?Increase protection of wetlands Planning
Commission
P+Z
50 Adaptation and
Resilience
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Not applicable to CEP Need to review All Hazard Mitigation
Plan
Need to review All Hazard
Mitigation Plan
N/A ?Develop extreme heat response plans Planning
Commission
P+Z
51 Adaptation and
Resilience
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Not applicable to CEP Need to review All Hazard Mitigation
Plan
Need to review All Hazard
Mitigation Plan
N/A ?Assess culverts for geomorphic capacity and aquatic organism passage Planning
Commission
P+Z
52 Agriculture/Food
Systems
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Not applicable to CEP Maintain and enhance agricultural
viability and sustainability for agricultural
uses through management planning,
infrastructure improvements, and
stewardship
Maintain and enhance
agricultural viability and
sustainability for
agricultural uses through
management planning,
infrastructure
improvements, and
stewardship
N/A ?Work with local universities and pilot carbon
sequestration practices
Energy
Committee,
City Manager
53 Agriculture/Food
Systems
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Not applicable to CEP Maintain and enhance agricultural
viability and sustainability for agricultural
uses through management planning,
infrastructure improvements, and
stewardship
Maintain and enhance
agricultural viability and
sustainability for
agricultural uses through
management planning,
infrastructure
improvements, and
stewardship
N/A ?Promote dialog between farmers and beekeepers to develop pollinator habitat Energy
Committee,
City Manager
54 Agriculture/Food
Systems
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Not applicable to CEP Maintain and enhance agricultural
viability and sustainability for agricultural
uses through management planning,
infrastructure improvements, and
stewardship
Maintain and enhance
agricultural viability and
sustainability for
agricultural uses through
management planning,
infrastructure
improvements, and
stewardship
N/A ?Promote long-term agricultural
stewardship and sustainability practices
that enhance soil health and
regeneration, reduce erosion, and
conserve water
Energy
Committee,
City Manager
Page 5 of 6
DRAFT Climate Action Plan Pathways and Action Worksheet 2/3/2022
55 Agriculture/Food
Systems
By 2025: 26% below
2005 levels, By 2030:
40% below 1990 levels,
By 2050: 80% below
1990 levels
Not applicable to CEP Maintain and enhance agricultural
viability and sustainability for agricultural
uses through management planning,
infrastructure improvements, and
stewardship
Maintain and enhance
agricultural viability and
sustainability for
agricultural uses through
management planning,
infrastructure
improvements, and
stewardship
N/A ?Work with local universities to learn
about low carbon fuel agricultural
vehicles.
Energy
Committee,
City Manager
Page 6 of 6
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
FOR A JUST TRANSITION
Vermont Climate Council, Just Transitions Subcommittee
August 2021
Table of Contents
I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................................... 2
II. Just Transitions Key Terms .......................................................................................................................................................... 3
III. Vermont’s Impacted & Frontline Communities ........................................................................................................................ 5
IV. Guiding Principles for a Just Transition .................................................................................................................................... 6
I. INCLUSIVE, TRANSPARENT & INNOVATIVE ENGAGEMENT ..................................................................................... 6
II. ACCOUNTABLE & RESTORATIVE .................................................................................................................................... 6
III. MOVING AT THE SPEED OF TRUST ................................................................................................................................ 7
IV. SOLIDARITY ......................................................................................................................................................................... 7
V. THE MOST IMPACTED FIRST ............................................................................................................................................. 7
VI. SUPPORTS WORKERS, FAMILIES & COMMUNITIES ................................................................................................... 7
V. Subcommittee Self-Assessment Questions ............................................................................................................................... 8
VI. Scoring Rubric ............................................................................................................................................................................ 10
I. Introduction
The Global Warming Solutions Act (GWSA), also known as Act 153, was passed by the Vermont
State Legislature in September of 2020 to require the State to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by
80 percent of its 1990 levels by 2050. The GWSA also stood up the Vermont Climate Council (Council)
and five subcommittees, including the Just Transitions Subcommittee.
Historically, the term “Just Transitions” is a way of framing for government and business action on
climate change. Its work encompasses both public policies and business action to deal with the impacts
of industry transition away from greenhouse gas emissions for jobs and livelihoods (the transition "out")
and aims to generate the low or zero greenhouse gas emission jobs and livelihoods of a sustainable
society (the transition "in"). Through the GWSA, the Just Transitions Subcommittee is charged with
ensuring that strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to build resilience to the effects of
climate change benefit and support all residents of the State of Vermont fairly and equitably.
The Just Transitions Subcommittee believes in proactively centering equity in this work rather than
reactively measuring it. These Guiding Principles are therefore meant to frame the work of the Council
and subcommittees around an equity lens. While the Legislature has asked us to focus on Vermont,
we recognize that the decisions we make in Vermont have repercussions outside of our borders, for
which we are also accountable.
First, we offer key definitions and clarify indicators of "rural, low income, and marginalized
communities" as outlined in the GWSA. Next, we lay out draft guiding principles for a Just Transition.
These are intended for the Council and subcommittees to evaluate as they develop their respective
recommendations. The Guiding Principles are meant to spark dialogue within Subcommittees and to
serve as a grounding checkpoint to ensure the inclusion of equity. They will be especially useful in
policy areas that might not traditionally be considered within an equity lens and would otherwise
reinforce historically marginalized, disadvantaged and underserved communities.
Finally, we translate the Guiding Principles into more precise questions that the Subcommittee should
use directly in assessing the “equity & justice” implications of their ideas and strategies. The Guiding
Principles and questions also provide a foundation for an equity assessment tool that the Just
Transitions Subcommittee plans to build before draft strategies are proposed, which will include more
measurable criteria and suggested information sources.
When developing these draft principles and questions, the subcommittee was influenced by the
perspectives of Indigenous voices, who urged the group to expand our understanding of frontline
communities to include the Earth and all living beings, as our human survival is not possible without
taking all life into consideration. Indigenous communities have long held the belief that we, as humans,
are here to steward the land that we thrive upon. Many Indigenous people have felt their voices have
been unheard and this stewardship ignored. In this context, a Just Transition can help to establish
reparations for the Earth’s healing.
“A Just Transition acknowledges the Earth is a living female organism – our Mother. Water is her lifeblood. The Earth
and Father Sky, with its air and atmosphere, are the source of life to be protected, not merely a resource to be
exploited, degraded, privatized and commodified.”
Excerpt from The Indigenous Principles of
Just Transitions, Indigenous Environmental Network
II. Just Transitions Key Terms
In this section, the Just Transitions Subcommittee offers definitions for “equity” and “justice” – both
vital components of a Just Transition and the implementation of the Guiding Principles. These words
are defined differently across disciplines, but the meanings presented here served as the foundation
for our work.
Equity
Distributive equity
starts by recognizing
disparities in the
allocation of
resources, health
outcomes, the
inequities in living
conditions and lack
of political power
place frontline /
impacted communities
at greater risk.
Distributive equity
strategies target
resources to adaption
and mitigation
affecting the
communities and
populations most
impacted.
Procedural equity
is often referred to
as equitable planning
and implementation.
Equitable planning
and implementation
require that
communities have a
meaningful
opportunity to
participate.
Policymakers must
collaborate with
communities to learn
about their
perspectives so that
solutions meet
community needs.
Equitable planning
focuses on the local
level and ensures that
local communities
have the opportunity
to provide input on
policies that directly
affect them.
Contextual equity
ensures that
mitigation and
adaption strategies
take into account that
low-income
communities, black
communities,
indigenous
communities and
people of color, and
people with
disabilities, amongst
others, are often
more vulnerable to
climate change.
Contextual equity
ensures that the
development of
mitigation and
adaption strategies
at statewide and
local levels take
these disparities into
account.
Corrective equity
ensures that
mitigation and
adaption strategies
provide communities
with clear processes
to hold the state
accountable to its
commitments to pursue
equity.1
1 Equity & Environmental Justice Working Group, Connecticut. (2020). Equity & Environmental Justice Working Group Report.
https://port.ct.gov/-/media/DEEP/climatechange/GC3/GC3- working-group-reports/GC3_equity_EJ_Final_Report_111320.pdf
Contextual Distributive Procedural Corrective
Justice
Environmental
Environmental justice is the equitable access to
environmental benefits, proportionate distribution
of environmental burdens, fair and equitable
treatment and meaningful involvement in decision
making, and recognition of the unique needs of
people of all racial and ethnic groups, cultures,
socioeconomic statuses, and national origins.
It works to redress structural and institutional
racism, colonialism, and other systems of
oppression and harm done to Black, Indigenous
and Communities of Color and other communities
and ecosystems that have experienced
marginalization and degradation.
Environmental Justice also seeks to address
insufficient governmental responses at the local,
state and federal level to environmental crises due
to the racial/ethnic demographics, national origin,
or socioeconomic status of highly-impacted
communities.
Climate & Energy
Climate justice operates at the intersection of
racial and social rights, environmental and
economic justice. It focuses on the root causes of
climate change, and call for a transformation to
a sustainable, community-led economy.
Climate justice begins with recognizing key
groups are differently affected by climate
change and connects the dots between civil
rights and climate change.
Energy justice aims to make energy accessible,
affordable, cleaner, and democratically
managed for all communities.2
2 Slightly Adapted from National Resources Defense Council. (July 2019). Definitions of Equity, Inclusion, Equality & Related Terms.
https://www.broward.org/climate/documents/equaityhandout_082019.pdf and The Initiative for Energy Justice https://iejusa.org.
III. Vermont’s Impacted & Frontline Communities
As global warming accelerates, the Council and its Subcommittees must engage with those on the
“frontlines” of the climate crisis. Studies continue to show that low-income communities, indigenous
peoples, and black and other communities of color are among those who are particularly vulnerable
to the impacts of climate change. In addition, as industry and jobs transition away from greenhouse
gas emissions and towards “greener” jobs and livelihoods, particular focus must be given to the
labor sector. Finally, some Vermonters may also be necessarily focused on achieving immediate
goals of food, shelter, safety and health, which can impact ability to focus on long-term adaptation
to climate and economic changes.
This word cloud provides a list of frontline and impacted communities and is not intended to be
exhaustive, nor does it take into consideration the intersectionality of people’s lives and the multiple
vulnerabilities that one may experience.
Impacted and frontline communities draw from key criteria, identifying those who:
• Are highly exposed to climate risks, such as health impacts, flooding, and extreme
temperatures;
• Experience oppression and racism, are excluded from opportunities, or have less resources to
adapt to climate and economic change;
• Bear the brunt of pollution and negative effects from today’s fossil fuel and extractive
economies; and
• Are more likely to experience a job transition as Vermont addresses climate change.
IV. Guiding Principles for a Just Transition
These principles set expectations regarding:
• How Vermont’s Climate Council and its sub committees will conduct their work;
• What Recommendations 3 are made by the Council; and
• How investments, implementation and oversight of climate action plans occur.
I. INCLUSIVE, TRANSPARENT & INNOVATIVE ENGAGEMENT
● All Vermonters are informed and able to participate throughout decision-making and
drafting of Recommendations, as well as future administration and oversight.
● The Council’s process and public engagement must recognize that people are experts of
their own climate and energy experience.
● Impacted communities must be recognized and their voices prioritized in conversations
surrounding equity, climate change, and the effects of specific Recommendations.
● Transition planning must involve innovative and wide community engagement that prioritizes
various stakeholders and community-based groups to assess Recommendations at local,
state and/or regional levels.
● Recommendations must be clear and understandable to all Vermonters, with plain language
that is easy to understand. Goals must be clearly identified. To ensure accessibility, the
Council must consider the needs of people with limited English, those living with a visual or
hearing impairment, and those with limited or no access to technology.
● Potential impacts, benefits, and burdens of recommended climate actions are identified and
shared publicly. This includes considering and naming known potential impacts, benefits and
burdens outside of Vermont’s borders.
II. ACCOUNTABLE & RESTORATIVE
● Recommendations must acknowledge that the status quo continues to perpetuate ingrained
systems of discrimination, inequality, inequity and racism. Recommendations must examine
existing practices and redress historical injustices through concrete actions that will lead to
a more equitable future.
● Ongoing assessment tools used by the Council should identify intended and unintended
inequities and their root causes.
● Recommendations must recognize inequality and seek to resolve them using clearly
identified strategies.
● Recommendations must recognize their potential impacts on the whole natural environment
– including air, water, soil and all living things.
● Recommendations must identify and consider barriers to implementation and include
strategies to overcome them.
3 In this document, the word “Recommendations” refers to the strategies, policies, programs or other recommendations that the Vermont Climate
Council will make in its Climate Action Plan.
III. MOVING AT THE SPEED OF TRUST
● Candor and honesty are essential for public trust and to prepare business, industry, labor,
communities and families for transition to a sustainable climate future.
● Planning and implementation must balance being time bound and honoring the varied ways
of learning, understanding and agreement that exist in different cultures and communities.
IV. SOLIDARITY
● Recommendations create inclusionary spaces for all traditions and cultures, particularly for
Indigenous communities, recognizing them as integral to a healthy and vibrant Vermont.
V. THE MOST IMPACTED FIRST
● Recommendations tackle the needs of impacted and frontline communities first, providing
the greatest benefits of transitions to these communities.
● Recommendations must be broad enough for the well-being of all Vermonters and include
targeted strategies for different groups that take into account their specific histories,
sociocultural and economic realities. They should also recognize when negative impacts are
being shifted onto frontline communities outside of the state.
● Where Recommendations create burdens, they also include ways to shift these burdens
away from impacted communities.
VI. SUPPORTS WORKERS, FAMILIES & COMMUNITIES
● Recommendations are explicit in their identification of potential and likely impacts on
workers, families and their communities based on the implementation of Vermont’s Climate
Action Plan.
● Recommendations should include transition plans to respond comprehensively to protect
impacted workers, including those that are seasonal, clerical and part-time.
● Transition plans must prioritize the needs and aspirations of workers, unions and
disproportionately impacted communities.
● Recommendations must consider diverse, economic regeneration and spur creation of well-
paying jobs with benefits.
● Recommendations must promote strong, equitable labor standards, support access to
unionization, and improve access to public services, particularly for groups most
disproportionately impacted.
● Recommendations for job training programs for displaced, at-risk and new workers must
lead to meaningful, life-sustaining, and valued work. These programs should be designed
to be accessible and affordable regardless of income or geography.
● Communities, local and regional governments, organizations, and families require the
capacity to implement recommendations both in the short and long-term. Recommendations
will consider current capacity and how to build needed capacity.
V. Subcommittee Self-Assessment Questions
The following questions were developed by the Just Transitions Subcommittee to help each
Subcommittee put the Guiding Principles into practice. They aim to better identify, understand, and
address the social impacts, types of impacted populations, and engagement process of individual
policy recommendations. These are not comprehensive, but rather indicative of the analysis required
to ensure a Just Transition for Vermont.
IMPACTED & FRONTLINE COMMUNITIES
● Which frontline and impacted communities might be most impacted by this recommendation?
● How do these communities experience inequity today around this issue?
ANALYZING BURDENS & BENEFITS
● Does this recommendation maintain existing inequities, make them worse or improve the
status quo?
● Who will benefit from this recommendation and how does this recommendation help benefits
be shared or targeted to help frontline and impacted communities the most? Be specific
about the communities and the ways these communities will benefit.
● Which communities will be burdened the most by this recommendation and how can that
burden be shifted away from impacted communities?
● What are the long-term and potential intergenerational impacts of this recommendation for
identified communities?
ENSURING EQUITABLE & JUST ENGAGEMENT
● How have frontline and impacted communities been part of creating and implementing this
recommendation? And how will they in the future?
● In what ways does your engagement with frontline/impacted communities recognize
different types of knowledge and expertise?
● In what ways can Vermonters hear their voices in the plan?
● Does the recommendation use plain language that is easy for all Vermonters to understand?
FUNDING & DATA
● How will this recommendation be funded? What percent of funding will be specifically to
support frontline, low-income and impacted communities? Will there enough funding to make
it affordable and accessible for identified communities?
● How will we know about the impacts of this recommendation on identified communities?
Which data or indicators will be needed? What process was used to determine the
indicators are resonate and relevant to most impacted community needs? How will it be
collected and shared?
IMPLEMENTATION & OUTCOMES
● What kind of jobs will be created by this recommendation? Will those jobs be fair, high-
paying jobs with good benefits? How will traditionally underserved Vermonters and unions
be prioritized for these jobs?
● What capacity is needed for communities, local/regional governments, organizations and
families to implement this recommendation? How will the recommendation build and/or
strengthen capacity, community trust, cooperation, and mutual support?
● How does this recommendation make a specific commitment to a just transition? Is this
commitment quantifiable and does it identify who is accountable?
● Does the recommendation support the natural environment? Does it promote fairness to all
living things?
VI. Scoring Rubric
The Rubric is intended to accompany a narrative response for each of the Assessment Questions in Section V. In
reviewing the proposal, please consider the Rubric’s prompts and their resonance to the goals and vision of this
project. An area is provided for comments. The Rubric allows a score of 1 (low) to 3 (high) for each criterion.
1 (low): The proposal meets the criteria to some degree but provides limited explanation or there are
significant opportunities to enhance these criteria in the proposal.
2 (moderate): The proposal meets the criteria. There are additional opportunities to enhance these criteria
to better meet the goals of the Guiding Principles.
3 (high): The proposal excels in meeting the criteria.
If a recommendation does not yet address the criteria at all, additional work is required.
Policy/Proposal Title:
Policy/Proposal Summary:
Frontline/Impacted Communities
Score 1 – 3 on impression of meeting criteria
Please select 1 low to high 3
Frontline/Most Impacted Communities well defined in proposal 1 2 3
Comments:
Proposal reflects understanding of existing inequities around the issue for frontline/most
impacted communities
1 2 3
Comments:
Total
Analyzing Burdens and Benefits
Score 1 – 3 on impression of meeting criteria
Please select 1 low to high 3
Proposal clearly identifies how benefits are shared for frontline/most impacted
communities
1 2 3
Comments:
Proposal clearly identifies who/what carries the burdens from the recommendation, if any 1 2 3
Comments:
Proposal includes solutions to shield frontline/most impacted communities from experiencing
burdens from the recommendation, if applicable
1 2 3
Comments:
Proposal outlines the long-term/intergenerational impacts (positive or negative) of
recommendations on impacted communities
1 2 3
Comments:
Proposal outlines how it will create a future that is more equitable than the unjust status quo 1 2 3
Comments:
Total
Ensuring Equitable & Just Engagement
Score 1 – 3 on impression of meeting criteria
Please select 1 low to high 3
Proposal reflects inclusion of frontline/impacted communities in design and implementation of
recommendation
1 2 3
Comments:
Vermonters can hear their voices in the recommendation 1 2 3
Comments:
Recommendation written in plain language and easy to understand 1 2 3
Comments:
Total
Funding & Data
Score 1 – 3 on impression of meeting criteria
Please select 1 low to high 3
Funding mechanism for recommendation is clearly defined 1 2 3
Comments:
Funding mechanism makes recommendation affordable and accessible to frontline/most
impacted communities, if applicable
1 2 3
Comments:
Proposal identifies data and indicators to determine success 1 2 3
Comments:
Proposal includes process for consultation with frontline/most impacted communities in
assessment activities
1 2 3
Comments:
Proposal includes plan for collection and review of data with frontline/most impacted
communities
1 2 3
Comments:
Total
Implementation & Outcomes
Score 1 – 3 on impression of meeting criteria
Please select 1 low to high 3
Proposal identifies new jobs/business/employment opportunities for the recommendation 1 2 3
Comments:
Jobs created by recommendation offer fair, high paying positions with good benefits 1 2 3
Comments:
A wide range of traditionally underserved Vermonters and unions are prioritized in the jobs
created by the recommendation
1 2 3
Comments:
Communities, local/regional governments, organizations and families have the capacity to
implement the recommendation.
1 2 3
Comments:
The recommendation provides a specific, quantifiable commitment to a just transition 1 2 3
Comments:
The recommendation supports the natural environment and promotes fairness to all living
things
1 2 3
Comments:
Total
Total scoring (21 low to 63 high):
Direct Benefits to Underrepresented/Most Impacted Communities (use blank spaces as needed to add)
The recommendation provides direct benefits for the following groups:
Agricultural Sector Yes No
Black/African-American, Brown, Latinx, Asian, Pacific Islander, and Indigenous
communities and Native nations
Yes No
Disabled and chronically ill people Yes No
Displaced due to severe weather Yes No
Older Vermonters Yes No
Formerly incarcerated individuals Yes No
Immigrants, regardless of immigration status Yes No
LGBTQIAP+ individuals Yes No
People living with low or very low incomes Yes No
Outdoor laborers Yes No
Recent graduates of the foster care system Yes No
Unions/Organized Labor Yes No
Women Yes No
Young People Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
Narrative on Impacted Communities:
Recommend: Yes Yes with Changes No
Explanation:
SOUTH BURLINGTON CLIMATE ACTION TASK FORCE
MEETING MINUTES
26 JANUARY 2022
1
The South Burlington Climate Action Plan Task Force held a meeting on Wednesday, 26 January 2022, at
7:00 p.m., in person at 180 Market Street and online via Zoom remote technology.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Chalnick, Bill Wargo, Darrylin Peters, Donna Leban, Ethan Goldman,
Michael Mittag, Sriram Srinivasan, Helen Riehle (Ex-Officio Council Liaison), Paul Conner (Ex-Officio Staff
Liaison)
ALSO PRESENT: Melanie Needle (CCRPC project consultant), Ann Janda (CCRPC Project Consultant), R.
Greco, S. Crowley, M. Murray, N. Anderson
1. Instructions on existing building in case of emergency and review of technology options – Paul
Conner, Director of Planning & Zoning
Mr. Conner provided instructions for those attending in person.
2. Agenda: Additions, deletions or changes in order of agenda items
No changes were made to the agenda
3. Open to the public for items not related to the agenda (7:04 pm)
No comments unrelated to the agenda were provided
4. Review of South Burlington data and demographics: populations, transportation, employment,
housing, etc.
Ms. Needle provided an overview of South Burlington’s demographics. She provided an overview of
the City’s populous and made note of the presence of at-risk communities, including households
with a person with a disability, the population over age 65, poverty, language, and those without
access to a vehicle. She noted the growth in population, which has outpaced statewide growth and
discussed the spread of household incomes in the City.
A significant portion of the South Burlington population are renters, higher that the statewide
average. Correlated, the growth in multi-family housing in recent years (Mr. Conner noted this trend
goes back 20+ years) has outpaced single family housing.
She discussed major sectors of greenhouse gas emissions at the statewide and city level, noting that
city data is in the process of being collected.
Major sectors of employment are retail trade, professional & scientific; health care,
accommodations and foods.
Regarding commuting and employment patters, there were 20,252 persons working in South
Burlington in 2019. Of these, 17,639 live outside the City and commute in. By contrast, there were
10,819 South Burlington residents with jobs, of which 8,206 work outside the city. Only 2,613
people lived AND worked in South Burlington in 2019. Ms. Needle then showed maps indicating
where South Burlington residents work.
Data was provided on vehicle ownership, heat systems, waste, and current land use (2016).
2
Task Force members discussed the data, its sources, and its meaning. Mr. Conner noted key
takeaways regarding commuting patterns, and the areas where South Burlington’s characteristics
differ from statewide data, as these could lead to a different emphasis or different set of tools to
address various energy sectors.
5. First draft of possible mitigation and adaptation Pathways and Actions to be included in the
Climate Action Plan, Ann Janda, CCRPC
Ms. Janda provided an overview of the draft pathways and actions. She noted that they originate,
largely from the State’s CAP. Some also come from the Enhanced Energy planning guide from the Vt
Dept of Public Service. CCRPC staff took a first shot of taking statewide actions and relaying them to
a South Burlington scale. This is intended as a starting point and is not an all-inclusive list.
Members posed some initial questions. There was discussion of what is a pathway vs an action.
6. Consider assigning Pathways & Actions, by topic area, to small work groups for review and
recommendations to the full Climate Action Plan Task Force in February and March
Members discussed how a review should be undertaken. Several members had signed up for slots to
serve on a work group set up for each of the seven sectors. Mr. Chalnick said he felt some of the big
sectors, such as Building / Thermal, might have more interest than just a work group, and that
perhaps the whole Task Force should look at some.
Mr. Conner provided clarifications on the open meeting law.
After discussion, it was decided that the Task Force leadership would coordinate with staff from the
City and CCRPC to develop a structure for how to go through the Pathways and Actions. If work
groups are needed, they can be discussed at the next meeting.
7. *Revised Climate Action Plan Table of Contents, Melanie Needle, CCRPC
Ms. Needle briefly noted that the updated Table of Contents reflects the Task Force’s request to
have the Climate Action Plan clear, straightforward, streamlined, and easily read.
8. Discuss equity in the context of the Climate Action Plan, Ann Janda, CCRPC
Mr. Conner noted that the Task Force’s charge includes using a lens of equity in the preparation of
the Plan. He noted that this would be the first plan to do so, and that it is likely to expand in the
future. Ms. Janda said that document referenced in the packet was developed as part of the State
CAP.
9. Minutes: January 13, 2022
A motion was made to approve the minutes of 13 January, 2022. The motion was seconded and
approved 7-0.
10. Other Business
None
11. Adjourn (9:12 pm)