The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0124 Technology Park WayLEGEND PROPOSED EXIS7 PROPOSED SEWER MANS AND SERVICES-s- SEWER MANHOLE O • WATER MAINS • AND SERVICES ______ _____ _ FLUSHING BASIN O • STORM DRAINAGE ----- 0 ---- D - CLIMOUT o • -0. UNDERORAIN ----- W ----- - w - CATCH BASIN ❑ ■ ROOF GRAIN _____ 00 __ � - LIQUIDPROPANE q1TLET OR END SECTION OR NATURAL GAS VALVE 00 N OVERHEAD POWER - CURB STOP UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE ____ - _____ _ FIRE HYDRANT Y UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC THRUST BLOCK IVCABLE TELEVISION — ENDCAP C E FIBER oPncs unurY POE ti a TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS .-_...._ to _. _.. ... — MTC OR TRANSFORMER PROPERTY LINE TELEPHONE MANHOLE _ • LEASE LINE Yvri. - - - -..... WETLAND LIMIT TELEPHONE PEDESTAL O BUILDING LUMINAIRE/LIGRT SETBACKS IRON PIPE O Ci PAVED ROAD TCE CONTROL POINT A TECHNOLOGY PARK LOT 2 Drawing Index _ USE AND INTERPRETATION OF TIN DRAWMCaS I. DRAWINGS PREPARED FOR SUBMITTAL ARE INTENDED FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNING, COORDINATION NTH OTHER DISCIPLINES UPUTIES. AND APPROVING AUTHORITIES THEY ARE NOT INTENDED AS FINAL DRAWINGS OR CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. 2. ORAWNGS PREPARED FOR CONSTRUCTION ARE INTENDED TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION NTH Subdivision Plat CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SPECIFICATIONS OWNER/CONTRACTOR AGREEMENTS AND TO BE FULLY COORDINATED MTH OTHER DISOPUNES 714EY ARE SPECIFIC TO THE PROJECT. IF ERRORS ARE DISCOYERED THEY ARE TO BE BROUGHT TO THE AFTEWROM OF MUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) BEFORE USING BY USE OF THESE DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT, THE SP1 Overall Site Plan OWNER REPRESENTS THAT (HE/SHE) HAS RENEWED, APPROVED, AND ACCEPTED THE DRAMOS. THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE CONSIDERED 'FINAL APPROVAL SUBMISSN' ONCE THEY RECEIVE STATE AD LOCAL APPROVAL. J. AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE THESE DRAWINGS AND COPIES THEREOF FURNISHED BY THE SP2 Site Plan ENGINEER ARE HIS PROPERTY. CHANGES TO THE DRAWINGS MAY ONLY BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER. 4. IT IS THE USER'S RESPONSOLITY TO ENSURE THIS COPY CONTAINS TINE MOST CURRENT S"p 3 Site Plan REVISIONS CONSTRUCTION NOTES: P1 Plan/Prof lie T. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, THESE ARE DO BE USED IN WERE PREPARED BY THTHE ED TENGINEERS �GENERAL CONDTIONS OFS CONUDELL STRUCTION CONTRACT, X_900 PREPARED BYAND CONJUNCTION WTH THE STANDARD THE JOINT P2 Plan/Profile CONTRACT DOCUMENTS COMMITTEE (EXDG). LATEST EDITION. COPIES ARE AVAILABLE AT WWWNSPE.ORGA XDC 2.UNI ERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS THE LOCATION OF EMS71MG UNDERGROUND UTIISTIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED BASED ON RESEARCH, UTILITY PLANS PROVIDED BY OTHERS AND/OR SURFACE EVIDENCE AVAILABLE AND WERE OBTAINED N A MANNER CONSISTENT MTH Plan/Profile THE ORDINARY STANDARD OF PROFESSIONAL CARE AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE DESIGN ENGINEER. P3 CON ON 3. DIFFERING SUBSURFACEOR PH CONDITIONS IF CONTRACTOR E THAT ANY SUBSURFACE OR PH DIn AT OR PHYSICAL COVE D CON ORR BET( YES SU CE O NE SIRE MAT IS UNCOVERED dt REVEALED EITHER: ESTABLISH US U OF SUCH A NATURE AS ESTABLISH ANY TECHNICAL DATA' (IS DATA' WINCH T IC AS TO REWIRE A CHANCE IN THE O RELIED IS MATERIALLY INACCURATE; OR (2) IS OF SUCH A CH PUNS / P4 Access Drive Profile C DIFFERS MATERIALLY FROM THAT SOWN OR THE DOCUMENTS OR INDICATED IN THE PUNS/CONTRACT OR (I) IS OF AN CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OR NO U ER RECOGNIZED AS IA UNUSUAL NATURE, AND DIFFERS MATERIALLY FROM CONDITIONS ORDINARILY ENCOUNTERED AND GENERALLY RECOGNIZED AS INHERENTT IN WORN LL or THE CHARCTER THEREOF PANDA REROVIDED FOR INFURTHER DISTURBINTHEG THE S BSURFACT CEOOR PHYSICAL CONDITIONS OR OCUMENTS; THEN CONTRACTOPERFORMINGRMy WORK INTLY AFTERBECOMING AWA CONNECTION THEREWITH EPSC1 Erosion Control Plan (EXCEPT IN AN EMERGENCY), NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER ABOUT SUCH CONDITION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT FURTHER DISTURB SUCH CONDITION OR PERFORM ANY WORK IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (EXCEPT AS AFORESAID) UNTIL RECEIPT OF MNTIE N ORDER TO DO SO. 4URUBES PRIVATE AND PUBLIC UTILITIES SUCH AS ELECTRIC. TELEPHONE. GAS CABLE, FIBER OPTIC ETC ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE EPSC2 Erosion Control Plan RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY. ANY INFORMATION SHOWN BY rCE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY (USUALLY TO ASSIST WITH PERMITTING). FINAL DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES COMPLIANCE WITH EASEMENTS AND REGULATIONS (STARE AND LOCAL) ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY. „dyer, Details 4 Di Water S.DIGSAFE IN ACCORDANCE WIN VERMONT STATE LAW (VSA TITLE 30 CHAPTER 86 AND PSB RULE 3,800) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO CONTACT GGSAFE SYSTEMS INC. 'DIGSAFE' AT I-BM-344-7233 AT LEAST 48 HOURS , EXCLUDING SATURDAYS SUNDAYS, AND LEGAL HOLIDAYS, BUT NOT MORE THAN 31 DAYST IN AN EMERGENCY. THE CONTRACTORSHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PREMARKING THEE SITE MAINTAIINNGBDESIGNATED MARE NGS FOR MOREINFORMATION NFORMMATION ON D2 Sewer Details OGSAFE REQUIREMENTS SEE WWWDIGSAFE.CaW. 6.J OBSITE SAFETY' NEITHER THE PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES OF TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCEA NOR THE PRESENCE LE TICE OR ITS EMPLOYEES AND SUB CONSULTANTS AT A CONSTRUCTION SITE, SHALL RELIVE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ANY OTHER ENTITY OF THEIR D3 Storm Water Details OBLIGATIONS, DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED 10, CONSTRUCTION MEANS METHODS. SEQUENCE. TECHNIQUES OR PROCEDURES NECESSARY FOR PERFORMING SUPERINTENDING OR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK OF CONSTRICTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS REWIRED BY ANY REGULATORY AGENCIES. TCE AND ITS PERSONNEL HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO EXERCISE ANY CONTROL OVER ANY CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR OR OTHER ENTITY OR THEIR EMPLOYEES IN D4 Miscellaneous Details Q1 CONNECTION KITH THEIR WORK OR ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS THE CLIENT AGREES THAT THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY YJ RESPONSIBLE FOR "SITE SAFETY, AND WARRANTS THAT THIS INTENT SHALL BE MADE EVIDENT IN THE CLIENTS AGREEMENT WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. THE CLIENT ALSO AGREES THAT THE CLIENT, TCE AND TGE'S CONSULTANTS SHALL BE INDEMNIFIED AND SHALL BE MADE �+ ADDITICINAL INSURED UNDER THE GENERAL CONTRACTORS GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY. D5 Miscellaneous Details 7. CODES AND STANDARDS COMPLIANCE: TCE SMALL EXERCISE USUAL AND CUSTOMARY PROFESSIONAL CARE IN ITS EFFORTS TO COMPLY WITH h CODES, STANDARDS REGULABGNS AND ORDINANCES IN EFFECT. THE OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT SUCH REQUIREMENTS MAY RE SUBJECT TO VARIOUS AND CONIRAOCTORY INTERPRETATIONS. TCE, THEREFORE, NULL MAKE REASONABLE PROFESSIONAL EFFORTS AND JUDGMENT TO D6 Erosion Control �+ INTERPRET APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AS THEY APPLY TO THE PROJECT. TCE. HOWEVER. CANNOT AND DOES NOT WARRANT OR GUARANTEE THAT NE PROJECT WILL COMPLY NTH ALL INTERPRETATIONS OF SUCH REQUIREMENTS. B.CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION: TCE MAY VISIT 774E PROJECT AT APPROPRIATE INTERVALS DURING CONSTRUCTION TO BECOME GENERALLY FAMILIAR D7 Erosion Control WITH THE PROGRESS AND QUALITY OF THE CONTRACTORS WORK AND ill DETERMINE IF THE WORK IS PROCEEDING IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE OWNER HAS NOT RETAINED TCE TO MAKE DETAILED INSPECTIONS OR TO PROVIDE EXHAUSTIVE OR CONTINUOUS PROJECT RENEW AND OBSERVATIONAN SERVICES TCE DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE PERFORMANCE OF, AND SHALL NOT HAVE SUPLIER RIESPONSIL-ITYOR MY OTHER ENTITY FURNISHING ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF MYASHALL FPERFORMING L1.0 Planting Plan ANY WORK ON THE PROJECT TTCETHE MATERIALS OR NOT SUPERVISE DIRECTSUS-CONTRACTOR, OR HAW CONTROL OVER THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK NOR HAVE ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION MEANS METHODS TECHNIQUES SEQUENCES OR PROCEDURES OF THE CONTRACTOR. IF THE OWNER DESIRES MORE EXTENSIVE PROJECT OBSERVATION OR FULL-TIME PROJECT REPRESENTATION. THE OWNER SHALL REQUEST SUCH SERVICES BE PROVIDED BY TCE AS ADDITIONAL SERVICES L1.1 Planting Plan L1.2 Landscape Details L2.0 Lighting Plan L2.1 Lighting Plan A2.1 Building Floor Plan A4.1 Building Elevations RFC SFP �g ?oo� %pf so. 6 9 INN I I I P Sc i I COMCAST WAY 13 P2 tar 1 2 .® I—ECi SP2I � 12 sI "Sell I I I SHUNPIKE ROAD 6 1 t 31 11 SP3 I I 4 i -P3 EIS I I U I I GREGO" DRIVE 10 gb 7 5 G t� BU�lvcroN I ictOlA � SHEET INDEX <TRUDELL CONSULTWG ENGINEERS (TCE IMM HAT• MN StUrAYR FOR INS PURNK OR CONCEPTUAL PLANS PREUMINARY PLANS ACT 230 SUBMISSION Fan CITY SUBMISSION CONSTRUCTION DRAWRNCS W'�O�W6, 11410,�7 OWaE TNA7 RV -- LAST REVSM 09/13/O7 TCE PROJECT NO: 2007100 Gmpw Sw• Feet 400 0 400 800 aw 1600 rlvjc%_E a vi-cLuon Owner/Applicant: TECHNOLOGY PARK PARTNERS 30 COMMUNITY DRIVE SUITE 4 SOUTH BURLWCTON. VT 05403 PHONE (802)860-1691 FAX (802)860.1695 Design Builder: REARCH COMPANY 30 COMMUNITY DRIVE SURE 8 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 09403 PHONE (802)985.5.595 FAX (802)985-590 Architect: S2 ARCHITECTURE 5224 SHELBURNE P.D. SHELBURNE. VT 05482 PHONE (802)985-5595 FAX (802)985-SS65 Structural Engineers GOLDSTEiN-MILANO LLC 125 MAIN STREET READING MA 01867 PHONE (780670-9990 FAX (781)670.9939 Civil Engineer. TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) P.O. BOX 308. 478 BLAIR PARK ROAD WILLISTON. VT 0549S PHONE (802)879-6331 FAX (802W79-0060 Landscape Architect: SE GROUP 131 CHURCH STREET BUIL94GTOK VT 054D1 PHONE (802)862.0096 FAIL (802)86.5.2440 Mechanical Engineer: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box 525 43 Krupp DrNe Wouston, VT OS495 Phone: (802)864-3800 Fan. (802)864-3904 Fire Protection: North Country Fire Protection P.O. Box 2004 Colchextm. VT OS446 Phone: (802)878-6594 Fax: (802)878-2786 S,\_TCE WMVINGS M7\I0 M7I00-Ol g 9/17/B007 40537 PN EDT 141.64 PAYED PARKING AREA APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF THE EASTERLY EDGE THE E 20' WIDE SEWER EASEMENT 2 AIRPORT APPROACH CONE CITY OF BURL �49 v. 507 p. 425 CITY EASEMENT STARTS to' SWTH OF MH E5 EXISTING 1 BUILDING D ° PROPOSED CABLE F�Id.DCOEXCNANGE FL LLC 202 DRAINAGE EASEMENT T¢ NkN 175 30' X 30' SIGN EASEMENT LOOT 64i,Ty EASEMENT TOE' VT. CAS SYSTEMS K . 397 R 66 PROPOSED 40' eo*ACCCESS 1ttlTY DEWALK NUBY & IwL1S FAMILY RUST REMAINING LAND s UTILITY r EAT ' 242 OF PARCEL A EASEMENT 1GG, EASEMENT 0 G..P.G. W P T Nfb 175 60t62 A. PAVED 0 _ S�y., 671 p. 735 WER EASSEMENT 20'SE AREANG P 42 6 TO 7J. EASEMENT FOR WATER LINE CD ALONG EXISTING LINE VT OAS SYSTEMS VT, GA S ST v. 315 P.er 1O CITY OF SO. BURL ASEMENT ALONG EDLUND COMPANY v. 507 p. 425 EXISTING LINES FOR v. 478 p. 682 POWER AND �` O TELEPHONE _P elide 104 20' SEVER EASEMENT �HUNp/Kf TO OF RL 1 507 P,Y 425 0 ROAD 14*'4q- A TRH pTYNT 20' EASEMENT FOR BIKEPATN TO CITY OF S0. BURL TON 20' WIDE EASEMENT TO CITY OF SO. BURL CENTERED ON EXISTING WATER LINE v. 507 p. 425 u INVESTORS CORP. OF VT. 25' EASEMENT TO '°' 364 p' LIM N.E.T. R I. pb. 252 p. 126 v. 131 P. 388 .TO' X 30' SIGN EASEMENT THE L07S ALONG COMMUNITY DRIVE MAY BE SUBJECT TO 10' WIDE EASEMENTS FOR POWER, TELEPHONE AND GAS SAID EASEMENTSa�4/ TO RUN ALONG AND ADJACENT TO COMMUNITY DRIVE. ��Nlllllllllllllell/lye �' 4E� Syr scoTr � TOTAL AREA -PARCEL A9 + LOT 2 s 658E Ac. THIS PLAT IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING NAYLOR LEGEND 1) A TOTAL STATION CONTROL TRAVERSE, EVIDENCE FOUND IN THE FIELD AND SET) IlxpgnW4Wp0�aex O OF SOUTHSURLINGTON AND THE TOWN OF WIWSTON LAMP E MIN#! P(SEr ) 'RON PIPE RECORDS.fX 2) BEING PORTION OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO TECHNOLOGY PARK ASSOC., INC. RON PwE (lOIA10 ) PMF ENERGY, INC AND AXINN-VERMONT, INC IN VOLUME 386 CONCRETE MONUMENT (FOUND ) PAGE 117 AND SHOWN ON A PLAT ENTITLED ' PLAT OF LAND OF THE DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION ', WNICH IS RECORDED ❑ G[NCRETE MONUMENT ( TD BE SET) IN PLAT BOOK 173 PAGE 28, 3) BEARINGS ARE BASED ON MAGNETIC NORTH TAKEN ALONG A LEG A GN.CutaTm Raul OF THE TRAVERSE ON DECEMBER 7, 1994. 4) PLANS OF THE VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION OF SHUN w ENSIING WATER UNE PIKE ROAD, PROJECT SOUTH BURLINGTON M 5200 (10)S. A -X' -N-X-- MRE FENCE PORTION OF THIS LAND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER AND SOME ¢ umn, Par PERMANENT RIGHTS ALONG SHUNPIKE ROAD WERE CONVEYED TO THE VAOT IN VOLUME 211 PAGES 80 AND 85, AND FROM THETA TO THE ES ExIs1INC SEVER UK CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON IN VOLUME 211 PAGE 304. G ErsTING NANRAL GAS UNE 5) THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR KIMBALL AVENUE WAS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON IN VOLUME 120 PAGE 428. THE -EUT- EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE CABLE RIGHT OF WAY FOR COMMUNITY DRIVE WAS DEEDED TO THE --EUP7T- EVSTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHLWE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON IN VOLUME 424 PAGE 693. AND POWER CAIBES 6) THE TOWN BOUNDARY ONE BETWEEN THE TOWN OF WILLISTON AND THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. AND THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THIS SUBDIVISION FOLLOWS THE CENTERLINE OF MUDDY BROOK. 7} THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO A STORM WATER DRAINAGE SERVICE AGREEMENT WAIVER AND EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED IN VOLUME 507 PAGE 431. APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD OF THE GTY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT, ON THE ____ DAY OF 200- SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS DAY OF ______ __ 200- BY CHAIRMAN OR CLERK SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Received for Record _ O.d. 200_ at -_ o'clock ___ minutes __ M and Recorded in Attest City Clerk Graphic Scale Feet 200 0 200 400 600 Boo aiya*a l � N LOCATION No. nalt, Radius Am L-th Chard Lanat ' Cl 23-- 14318 59.43 59.01 S5716'41'E C1 f033D0 162.26 162.10 1 '4 'W C3 973.00 15Z84 1S268 5 '49' C4 927.00 585.76 576.07 N3 9' 'E CS 4' ' 47ZOO 534.03 506.00 C6 3612'1 86Z00 547.85 538.78 S32'29'56"W C7 64'4934 412D0 486.15 441.68 S83V0.53'W C8 92'4834 317.00 51349 459.16 N1810'03'W C19 4913'52 37ZOO 32,194 314.06 S395724 C20 0720'25 8J3DO 106. 72 106.64 N24'34'02'E C2f 0720'25 773.00 98.03 98.98 S24J402 W C22 342637 377.00 226.63 22124 S11V056 W C23 09V8'OS 377.00 60.11 80.04 S10'4B'25"E bgdag�--E 12 S73'3332Ng- 57.90' L4 S6376'11 E 60.28 L5 S691011 60.08 L23 S77V43 81.94 L30 S691010 E28. IS ' LJ/ 5891011E 1876' L32 S232349 W I .13' Ric SFP 18 AiZ® C/4-of C, �o®/ a,7 Subdivision Plat ,,,, -gm 2007100-40 Ut_ 2 LOT SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL A TECHNOLOGY PARK "°"" V. JAO D SOT Community Drive Date 9107A7 kay 1'-200' South Burlington, Vermont IrTRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) " '-' 173 1027 RevTstoaa _-- Oaanptlur __ - _ - 1x,ee ey 14 Blair Park Road Box 308 W91Mton. Vermont 04495 879-6331 BURLINGTOR PROPERTIES `\ LNMNED PAR — 'WHALE'S TAILS" SCULPTURE / / GREEN ACRES 11 PIZZAGALU PROPERTIES, LLC 20' SEVER EASEMENT TO dTY OF 50. BUR NGTON ! / ! Ao' R.O. W S / ! _ CITY OF SO.. BOILING. T -- // ;! I13 o� / �It (r� NSEH 70 D- /% \ / 32' W70TI / / LIE, / 12 POND PARCEL B / 1 EXISPN FENCE LINE i FUTURE ! / \ SUBDIVISION LINES \ 10 ISO' -MIA IE HIGHWAY OYMAY MIRICT jo APPROX. 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN LIMITS (ZONE -A', PARCEL #500195 000) ,. (F.). R.M. 3/16191) (NO ELEVATIONS PROWDED) 30' EASEMENT TO 10' WIDE�� VT. ELEC. CO-OP. TREAM BUFFER 9___-- EASEMENT TO / CR. MT POWER CORP 20' EASEMENT FOR / ` \ •�"- RECREATION PATH TO CITY Ors0 BURL. WELLSTON LOP, TIES, LTD ANC DISTRIBUTION. CTR PROPER ' Sou RIGCS- C. ,Y S. WASHBURN Of MW H 11 POND /1 8b / 0 `PROPOSED 10' EASEMENT TO O.M.P.C. 100' STREAM BUFFER / PROPOSED 20' SEWER - EASEMENT TO CITY DELINEATED OF SO' BURLINGTON WETLANDS CLASS 2 N/F PARKNEW AT TICONDEROGA DELINEATED WETLANDS )EUNEA TEO CLASS 2 WETLANDS CLASS 3 P 1 20' W10E EASE To CITY OF S0.SEWER BURL. GTY EASEMENT STAR' T0' Sd/IH OF MH a G7Y/S'fA 50* WETLAND - I EASEMENT TO� VT. GAS SYS TENS EASEMENT �� GAi 5. EASEMENT EASTING UTILITY EASEMENT 50' WEWETLANDBU BUFFER / 20' SEWER 20 SE EASEMENT EASEMENT TO CITY S0. BURL h i 90' ACCESS A UTILITY EASEM \ EXISTING �� •. /, xlsn M.P.C. LO EASEMENT FOR RECREATION PATH m CITY OF SO. BURL 100' EASEMENT TO "yG GM.P.0 �FF C. SNEPARD -!- RECREATION iA N/F D. & L. O'BRIEN /— FUTURE 8' W10E aEdtEA'I PATN 20' EASEMENT i0 l'HAMPLAIN WA— DISTRICT �'- APPROX 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN LIMITS �\ WTR FA I MFN1 iO F 0 R Ii11NG I(NJ ` PARCEL C \� 8c 25' EASEMENT .ET. tr T. r n R/NSm 20' EASEMENT OF FOa Nr _ � �� -. . euRlxw N/F ' fLAS' 2 -\`\ .- 'Cf&f NOLDCO E%diANGE 111, r < TO CITY of w 6 7 `U% 30' X 30' SIGN EASEMENT 60, ow 0 TOO EASEMENT of � TO GM.P.c. ,) 'PROPOSED DRAINAGE N/P EASEMENT RUBY B. 1WLUS FAMILY TRUST ) N/F ! \'•\ 1/l�J�ry�µ EDLUND COMPANY / OT 25 EASEMENT CITT O NEE T. k T. 3 N 20' EASEMENT FOR BIKEPAM TO CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON PROPOSED N/F RECREATION PATH INVESTORS CORP. OF VT. Wr1HW EASEMENT `_-20' WIDE EASEMENT TO CITY OF 50. BURL CENTERED ON EXJS17NO WATER LINE ---JO' X 30' SIGN EASEMENT CREENTREE PARK N/F / �yOR� / WW GRAINGER, INC. GTY OF SO. BURLINGTON REc, S /VED C, FP 18 2007 of Won e�ni nWon Technology Park South Burlington, VT Lot 2 OWNER: ----.. Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 N/F Phone:(802)860-1691 WOODLAND COMMONS COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUM Fax: (802�80-1695 DESIGN BUILDER: ReArch Company 30 Community Drive Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 05403 To Phone:(802)863-8727 Fax: (802)863.8734 ARCHITECT: ' C"°hle kAU Fee SIN 200 O 200 400 600 Boo PLANNING DATA OWNER. TECHNOLOGY PARK ASSOCIATES, INC. ENERGY, INC. AXINN_ INC, 30 COMMUNITY DRIVEIR I MONT SOUTH SURUNGTONVT 05403 PHONE. (802)860--1691 �� ZONE A41XED INDUSTR(ALICOWMERCIAL LOT 2, 5.0 AC.rV / BUILDING SIZE: 54459 SF 0 -^ (J.5 SPACES11000 GF) (54,459 SF) 191 SPACES PARKING SPACE REQUIRED PARKING SPACES PROVIDED: 191 PROPOSED (INCLUDING 6 HANDICAPPED SPACES AND SPACES FOR FUEL EFFICIENT' VEHICLES) (' AX . 191 SPACES) LOT COWRAGES PROPOSED FRONT YARD: 4225 SF 16.32X BUILDING. 18,IW SF - S.= ALL IMPROVEMENTS: 90,935 41-72X -LIGH71NG PLAN SEE PLAN BY SE GROUP -PLANTING PLAN SEE PLAN BY SE GROUP -CMNECRON DETAILS UPON APPLICATION TO UM71ES -?HE LOCATION OF EMS77NG UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT SEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED By THE OWNER OR THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMMENCING WOW, AND AGREES To BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED By THE CONTRACTORS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY SAFE" TO CONTACT 'DIG SA " AT 1-800-2,25-4977 TO LOCATE ANY UNDER GROUND UTILITIES BEFORE EXCAVATION BEGINS. INS THE CONTRACTOR IS To NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCY CUTILITIES AS SHOWN AND AS FOUND. -60,650 SF OF PAWING LOT 6,347 SF OF ISLANDS IN PARKING LOT f. SCR Graphic Scale 'SasIXII 611i�_ Feet PAD 30 0 30 60 90 12(' Awa OONCRETE WIN LOT 6\I PUMP V SUMP PROPOSED 3 STORY OFRCE SULDING .0 '..E. '4&0sT_JJ4J5 A CONTROL PNT 8 fra 1 PAW r CaVDIAT (CAP k 1 R TO ARCH DRAWING FOR PLAZA DETAIL Rout TO ARCH. C PROPOSED 1' CONCRETE SIDMALK IV "I 11 it ------- WATER SDWCE- \1 TO LOTS 4 &,o EA j N 3X5 3* OCAPAT VOST SAN. MH (CAP -J4a62 11 CAP R& A~ SERWCE =:W34 r(02)3"5 WELOT 3 f OUT-1340. 2 Zap 03 IflUT6340.0 934( NO DISTURWXE FES A.=0 I END OF ORAWMTO -RE CURB CON ORE. CURB SNOW STOWAGE AREA PIC 6� nNAGE "337.7� FES W-JXJ5 - pl GATE VALVE 1v33&4 lour-im.80 1, PIAL) I HYDRANT ON-3M.75 IS (TYPICAL) IS T. 127 DA FLOW, 100 EASEVINT Ly�- SIGN 25' EASEMENT TO DETECT N.E.- P 388 DS CURB (Tw. % -SIGNS FOR ACCESSIBLE SPACE Zoo TrP.. OF 6 SPACES _A� _AL_ cafto TYPE 9 1, ' T PARKING A -340.7 _ FOR `FZEMC1PT_ 1-337-2 MENICU 0-3M.27 (18-) HYDRANT )OUT-336.07 (16-) IOUT-j37. �A S' TE Own, (TYPICAL) w WIDE � -END PF i V D5 UP -exist. SAN. MH 2 344. fz_ 06 - IN.33S72 I OINU-T3393.69.-RM7M EYJSTINIS T 20' SPARE CONDUITS SEWER EASEMENT FOR LOT 3 i IV 00 BIKE CITY 411 1 Technology Park "0- 8 C --- --- - ----- - South Budington, VT Lot 2 OWNER: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802)860-1691 Fax: (802)860-1695 _v DESIGN BUILDER: ReArch Company II 30 Community Drive Suite 8 LPT'� 1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)863-8727 Fax; (802)863-8734 RIFAV !,41M WITIM V' ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne, VT 05482 Phone:(802)98"695 Fax: (802)9 5-5565 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC 125 Main Street x Reading, MA 01867 ' Phone:(781)670-9990 Fax: (781)670-9939 CIVIL ENGINEER: 33a5. Trudell Consulting Engineers 4788lair Park Road P.O.Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 XN426 w Phone:(802)879-6331 Fax: (802)879-0060 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: BE Group 131 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 . . .... P 1 )2)862-0096 EASEMENT FOR Fax: (802)865-2440 TH DEDICATED TO SO. 80 NC MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box 525 43 Krupp Drive Williston, VT 05495 120, WAFL DMI, Phone-(802)864-3800 LLC .175P. 160 Fax: (802)864-3904 Pb. 10539 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Omega Electric 25 Omega Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)862-0517 Fax: (802)862-4349 FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protection FOR KIWALL AVE P.O. Box 2004 & BIKE PATH SEE Colchester, VT 05446 SHEETS Pt P2 & P3 Phone:(802)878-6694 Fax: k802j878-2186 DATE: 09/07/2007 SCALE: 1*=30' W OF RDIISIONS No. Date n I I Fl-f City Subme 9-13-07 E yS j IMPORTANT NO APPROXIMATE LOCATION 1. EXISTING CONTWR INFORMATION BASED ON LIDAR INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE STATE OF VERMONT MAPPING DIVISION, DATED NOWUSER 2004. 2. ADDITIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC GROUND SURVEYS CONDUCTED BY TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 3. THE ROAD WIDENING AND PAYING SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PUBLIC WORKS 4. WETLANDS HAVE BEEN DELINEATED BY OTHERS. 20' CENTERED ON PATH EASEMENT J 2 5 2" MTIININOOS To 8E REPUR9 CGMC. PAVEMENT S' INTERSECTION T EVERY GRADED EWE N AREA WITHNAA DRIVEWAY OR ROAD Z" TOPSOIL I/4'/ET PITCH T/d%FT PITON MIRAFI FILTER FABRIC 50OX 12" GRAVEL SUBBASE SE£ Sf1E PLAN FOR GRADING AND PATH LOCATION 2 BIKE PATH SECTION TYPICAL 8 _ L — S DETECT"J 4 WARNINABLEG TEXTIIRE �� Ta ~• (__ T P r.) FuiWto KIMBALL AVENUE -... ---� ENDB WO FEET AHEAD' ' lop NEW 811E PA TOP-944 96'0"tax C AND MW.OH � f ALL DMTIMBRD lei l( WETAND i --- r-33ase __ % __ LOUT .,SITS �P� EMIRATE e' -- eerE PATH �3< ,,,E -- --r - " " LONG EXISTYq j RAVED ROAD 24' I RAVED AM R i CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS' THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED BY TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (ICE) AND ARE INTENDED TO BE USED IN CONXNCTON WITH THE STANDARD GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TTC-700 PREPARED BY THE ENGINEERS JOINT CONTRACT DOCUMENTS COMMITTEE (EXDC). LATEST EDITION. COPIES ARE AVAILABLE AT WWWNSPE.ORG/EJCDC 2.UNDERGRGUND IMPROVEMENTS THE LOCA17ON OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND U71LO17ES AND IMPROVEMENTS SOWN ARE ASSUMED BASED ON RESEARCH, UTILITY PLANS PROVIDED BY OTHERS AND/OR SURFACE EVIDENCE AVAILABLE AND WERE OBTAINED IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE ORDINARY STANDARD OF PROFESSIONAL CARE AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE DESIGN ENGINEER. 3.DIFFERING SUBSURFACE OR PHYSICAL CONDITIONS: IF CONTRACTOR BELIEVES THAT ANY SUBSURFACE OR PHYSICAL CONDITION AT OR CONTOUOUS TO THE SITE THAT IS UNCOVERED OR REVEALED EITHER: (0 IS OF SUCH A NATURE AS TO ESTABLISH THAT ANY "TECHNICAL DATA ON WHICH CONTRACTOR RELIED IS MATERIALLY INACCURATE: OR (2) IS OF SUCH A NATURE AS TO REWIRE A CHANGE IN THE PLANS/ CONTRACT DOWNENTS OR (3) DIFFERS MATERIALLY FROM THAT SHOWN OR INOCAIEp IN THE PLANS/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS,' OR (4) IS OF AN UNUSUAL NATURE. AD DIETERS MATERIALLY E720M CONOIflONS ORDINAR0.Y ENCWNIERFD AND GENERALLY RECOGNIZED AS PIHERENT IN WORK OF TIRE CHARACTER PROYIOED FOR IN THE PUNS/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THEN CONTRACTOR SHALL. PROMPTLY AFTER BECOMING AWARE THEREOF AND BEFORE FURTHER OSNRBING THE SUBSURFACE OR PHYSICAL CONDI7NNN5 OR PERFORMING ANY WORK M CONNECTION THERENITi (EXCEPT IN AN EMERGENCY), NOTIFY OWNER AND ENONEER ABOUT SUCH CONDITION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT FURTHER DISTURB SUCH C ITYKTN OR PERFORM ANY 'A'pRK IN CONNECTII. THEREWTIH (EXCEPT AS AFORESAID) UNTIL RECEIPT OF WRITTEN ORDER TO GO S0. *UTILITIES PRIVATE AND PUBLIC UTILITIES SUCH AS ELECTRIC TELEPHONE, GAS, CABLE, FIBER OPTIC ETC. ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY. ANY INFORMATION SHOWN BY TCE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY (USUALLY TO ASSIST WITH PERMITTING). FlNAL DESIOI. CONS'CTON AND MAINTENANCE ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES. IXXAPLIANCE MTN EASEMENTS AND REGULATIONS (STATE AND LOCAL) ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY. s DIGSAFE IN ACCORDANCE WITH VERMONT STATE LAW (VSA 77TU 30 CHAPTER 86 AND PSB RULE 3,800) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO CONTACT DIGSAFE SYSTEMS HNC DIGSAFE" AT 1-588-344-7233 AT LEAST 48 HOURS . EXCLUDING SATURDAYS SUNDAYS AN0 LEGAL HOLIDAYS BUT NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS BEFORE COMMENCING EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES EXCEPT IN AN EMERGENCY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRE -MARKING THE SITE AND MANTAINING DESIGNATED MARKINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION ON DIGSAFE REQUIREMENTS SEE B.PSITE ESENCE 0 ICE Ot ITS EMPLOYTY. NEITHER THE ES ANDASUBCCONSULTAIIVITIES NTS AEA CONSTRUC ON SITE. SHENGINEERS ALLLRELIVE THENOR THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ANY OTHER ENTITY OF THEIR OBLIGATIONS. O/TES AND RESPONSBIL' S INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED m. CONSIRUCTON MEAD, METHODS, SEQUENCE. TECHNIQUES OR PIGGERIES NECESSARY FOR PERFGRMING, SUPERINTENDING OR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK OF CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS REQUIRED BY ANY REGULATORY AGENCIES. TCE AND ITS PERSONNEL HAYS NO AUTHORITY TO EXERCISE ANY CONTROL OVER ANY CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR OR OTHER ENTITY OR THEIR EMPLOYEES IN CONNECTION WITH THEIR WpRK OR ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS. THE CLIENT AGREES THAT THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR JOBSITE SAFETY. AND WARRANTS THAT THIS INTENT SHALL BE MADE EVIDENT IN THE CLIENT'S AGREEMENT IMTH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. THE CLIENT ALSO AGREES THAT THE CLIENT. TEE AND TCE•S CONSULTANTS SHALL BE INDEMNIFIED AND SHALL BE MADE ADDITIONAL INSURED UNDER THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY. 7.CODES AND STANDARDS COMPLIANCE TCE SHALL EXERCISE USUAL AND CUSTOMARY PROFESSIONAL CARE IN ITS EFFORTS TO COMPLY WITH CODES, STADADS, REGULA TONS AND ORDINANCES IN EFFECT. THE OWNER ACKNOW.EOGES THAT SUCH REQUIREMENTS MAY BE SUBXCT TO VARIOUS AND CONTRADICTORY INTERPRETATIONS. TCE THEREFORE, WILL ITS REASONABLE PROFESSIONAL EFFORTS AND VDOMENT TO INTERPRET APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AS THEY APPLY TO THE PROJECT. TCE. HOWEVER, CANNOT AND DOES NOT WARRANT OR GUARANTEE THAT THE PROJECT WILL COMPLY WIN ALL INTERPRETATIONS OF SUCH REQUIREMENTS &CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION: TCE MAY VISIT THE PRD.IECT AT APPROPRIATE INTERVALS DURING CONSMUC77ON TO BECOME GENERALLY FAMILIAR MTH THE PROGRESS AND QUALITY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK AND TO DETERMINE IF THE WORK IS PRECEDING IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THE OWNER HAS NOT RETAINED TCE TO MAKE DETAILED INSPECTIONS OR TO PROVIDE EXHAUSTIVE OR CONTINUOUS PRO.ECT REVIEW AND OBSERVATION SERVICES TCE DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE PERFORMANCE OF, AND SHALL NOT HAVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR, THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF ANY CONTRACTOR, SUB -CONTRACTOR, SUPPLIER OR ANY OTHER ENTITY FURNISHING MATERIALS OR PERFORMING ANY WORK ON THE PROECT. ICE SHALL NOT SUPERVISE. DIRECT OR HAVE CONTROL OVER THE CONTRACTORS WORK NOR HAVE ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CON5IRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES OR PROCEDURES OF THE CONTRACTOR. IF III OWNER DESRES MORE EXTENSIVE PROJECT OBSERVATION OR FULL-TIME PR0C7 REPRESENTATION, THE OWNER SHALL REQUEST SUCH SERVICES BE PROVIDED BY TCE AS ADDITIONAL SERVICES. ' ---- EDGE OF WEILAND AS DELINEATED BY KENT KOPTUICH .-dC70BER 1995 LOT I &,�7CAE� S V�D �� EP 18 200.7 ty of SO' guru ogton 1�$ Technology Park South Burlington, VT Lot 2 OWNER: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)860-1691 Fax: (802)860-1695 DESIGN BUILDER: --- ReArch Company 30 Community Drive Suite 8 w South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)863.8727 Fax: (802)863-8734 I ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shelburne Rd. -------- _;-.- _.. __--_ Shelburne, VT 05482 Phone:(802)985-5595 Fax: (802)985SM5 �•'"�-' STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC 125 Main Street Reading, MA 01867 - - Phone:(781)670-9990 _ Fax: (781)670-9939 �— CIVIL ENGINEER: yf- Trudell Consulting Engineers 478 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)879-6331 Fax: (802)879-0060 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: BE Group 131 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Phone:(802)862-0096 \ Fax: (802)865.2440 MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box 525 43 Krupp Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)M"00 Fax: (802)864-3904 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Omega Electric 25 Omega Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)862-0517 Fax: (602)862-4349 FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protection P.O. Box 2004 Colchester, VT 05446 Phone:(802)878-6594 Fax: (802)878-2186 DATE: 09/07/2007 SCALE: 1-=3C REVISIONS No. Date i Fina Crty sl:mrsRrw, 9-13-a7 Graphic Scala Feet 30 0 30 60 90 120 NO 7637 CIVIL \/ 1 , 0000. I 1 _' -- ----- - `-- ---------- --- - - CC -..- r , KIMBAL AVENUE Y ---- 1, i' 1 8 �• 8 �—� �-- , Y 8 --------- h_______A.__,{_. -_ _-_ ______...._ ___ __ _ TEx MfiIIN __ ___ _ _ _ __ _ _ -_ EXISTING f0 I WA 0 LOT 2 IMPORTANT NOTE 1. EXISTING CONTOUR INFORMATION BASED ON LIDAR INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE STATE OF VERMONT MAPPING OVISION. DATED NOVEMBER 2004. 2. ADDITIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC GROUND SURVEYS CONDUCTED BY TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS. I THE ROAD WIDENING AND PAVING SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PUBLIC WORKS. 4, WETLANDS HAVE BEEN DELINEATED BY OTHERS My CENTERED ON PAIN EASEMENT _ r 2- S' 10, 2- BOUMINWs CONC. PAVEVENt g• GRADED TYPE N rrr--- 10 BE REPUCED / AT EVERY WIERSECRON WITH A ORWWAY i /// OR ROAD 2' TOPSOIL T/4'/FT PITON 1/4"/FT PITON 4 4-12' MIRAFI FILTERFABRIC SOOX GRAVEL SUBBASE SEE SITE PUN FOR GRADING AND PATH LOCATION BIKE PATH SECTION TYPICAL -s TJ--TT PROPOSED Off 's# Technology Park South Burlington, VT XMWAU AVENUE ROAD �.rMENara CURXENIny UNDER Lot 2 EXISTING SAN. MH CONSTRUCTR)N l350.28 a338 22 1 1 I 1 c^I r — ; v .] ------------------- - • LOT 3�_--�. I ♦ TOPSON. SEED MIX C AND MIKCH WIDE EASEMENT FOR BIKE I ALL DISTURBED AREAS BIKE PATH CITY OF 50. BURUBURLI NGTON CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED BY MUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) AND ARE INTENDED TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE STANDARD GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, PC-700 PREPARED BY THE ENGINEERS JOINT CONTRACT DOCUMENTS COMMITTEE (EJCDC), LATEST EDITION. COPIES ARE AVAILABLE AT WWW.NSPEORG/EJCDC 2.UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS: THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED BASED ON RESEARCH, UTILITY PUNS PROVIDED BY OTHERS AND/OR SURFACE EVIDENCE AVAILABLE AND WERE OBTAINED IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE ORDINARY STANDARD OF PROFESSIONAL CARE AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE DESIGN ENGINEER. 3,01 ERING SUBSURFACE OR PHYSICAL CONDITIONS: IF CONTRACTOR BELIEVES THAT ANY SUBSURFACE OR PHYSICAL CONDITION AT OR CONTIGUOUS TO THE SITE THAT IS UNCOVERED OR REVEALED EITHER: (1) IS OF SUCH A NATURE AS TO ESTABLISH THAT ANY 'TECHNICAL DATA' ON WHICH CONTRACTOR RELIED IS MATERIALLY INACCURATE; OR (2) IS OF SUCH A NATURE AS TO REQUIRE A CHANGE IN THE PLANS/ CONTRACT DOCUMENTS; OR (3) DIFFERS MATERIALLY FROM THAT SHOWN OR INDICATED IN THE PLANS/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OR (4) IS OF AN UNUSUAL NATURE, AND DIFFERS MATERIALLY FROM CONDITIONS ORDINARILY ENCOUNTERED AND GENERALLY RECOGNIZED AS INHERENT IN WORK OF THE CHARACTER PRO14DED FOR IN THE PLANS/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THEN CONTRACTOR SHALL, PROMPTLY AFTER BECOMING AWARE THEREOF AND BEFORE FURTHER DISTURBING THE SUBSURFACE OR PHYSICAL CONDITIONS OR PERFORMING ANY WORK IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (EXCEPT IN AN EMERGENCY), NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER ABOUT SUCH CONDITION. CONTRACTORSHALL No FURTHER DISTURB SUCH CONDITION OR PERFORM ANY WORK IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (EXCEPT AS AFORESAID) UNTIL RECEIPT OF WITTEN ORDER TO DO So. 4.U77LITIES. PRIVATE AND PUBLIC UTILITIES SUCH AS ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE. GAS, CABLE FIBER OPTIC ETC. ARE THE RESPON—IrY OF THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY, ANY INFORMATION SHOWN BY TCE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY (USUALLY TO ASSIST WITH PERMITTING). FINAL DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES. COMPLIANCE WITH EASEMENTS AND REGULATIONS (STATE AND LOCAL) ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY. 5-DIGSAFE. IN ACCORDANCE NTH VERMONT STATE LAW (VSA TITLE 30 CHAPTER 86 AND PSB RULE 3,800) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO CONTACT DIGSAFE SYSTEMS INC. 'DIGSAFE" AT 1-a68-344-7233 AT LEAST 48 HOURS . EXCLUDING SATURDAYS, SUNDAYS. AND LEGAL HOLIDAYS BUT NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS BEFORE COMMENCING EXCAVATION AC77WTIES EXCEPT IN AN EMERGENCY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRE -MARKING THE SITE AND MAINTAINING DESIGNATED MARKINGS. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON DIGSAFE REQUIREMENTS SEE SJOBSITE SAFETY.. NEITHER THE PROFESSIONAL AC77WTIES OFTRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE), NOR THE PRESENCE OF TCE OR ITS EMPLOYEES AND SUB CONSULTANTS AT A CONSTRUCTION SITE, SHALL RELIVE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ANY OTHER EN77TY OF THEIR OBLIGATIONS, DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO. CONSTRUCTION MEANS, MEMODS SEQUENCE, TECHNIQUES OR PROCEDURES NECESSARY FOR PERFORMING, SUPERINTENDING OR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK OF CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS REQUIRED BY ANY REOULATORY AGENCIES TCE AND ITS PERSONNEL HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO EXERCISE ANY CONTROL OVER ANY CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR OR OTHER ENTITY OR THEIR EMPLOYEES IN CONNECTION WITH THEIR WORK OR ANY HEALM OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS THE CLIENT AGREES THAT THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONS19LE FOR JOBSITE SAFETY. AND WARRANTS THAT THIS INTENT SHALL BE MADE EVIDENT IN THE CLIENTS AGREEMENT WIN THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. THE CLIENT ALSO AGREES THAT THE CLIENT, TCE AND TCE'' CONSULTANTS SHALL BE INDEMNIFIED AND SHALL BE MADE ADDITIONAL INSURED UNDER THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY. 7CODES AND STANDARDS COMPLIANCE TCE SHALL EXERCISE USUAL AND CUSTOMARY PROFESSIONAL CARE IN ITS EFFORTS TO COMPLY NTH CODES STANDARDS REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES IN EFFECT. THE OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT SUCH REQUIREMENTS MAY BE SUBJECT TO VARIOUS AND CONTRADICTORY INTERPRETATIONS. TCE THEREFORE, WILL ITS REASONABLE PROFESSIONAL EFFORTS AND JUDGMENT TO INTERPRET APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AS THEY APPLY TO THE PROJECT. TCE, HOWEVER, CANNOT AND DO'S NOT WARRANT OR GUARANTEE THAT THE PROJECT WILL COMPLY WIN ALL INTERPRETATIONS OF SUCH REQUIREMENTS. &CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION; TCE MAY VISIT THE PROJECT AT APPROPRIATE INTERVALS DURING CONSTRUCTION TO BECOME GENERALLY FAMILIAR WITH THE PROGRESS AND QUALITY OF THE CONTRACTORS WORK AND TO OETERMINE IF THE WORK IS PRECEDING IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE MT N THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. THE OWNER HAS NOT RETAINED TCE TO MAKE DETAILED INSPECTIONS OR TO PROVIDE EXHAUSTIVE OR CONTINUOUS PROJECT REVIEW AND OOSMVA71ON SERVICES. TICE DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE PERFORMANCE OF, AND SHALL NOT HAVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR, 7H£ ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF ANY CONTRACTOR, SUB -CONTRACTOR. SUPPLER OR ANY 07HER ENTITY FURNISHING MATERIALS OR PERFORMING ANY WORK ON THE PROJECT. TCE SHALL NOT SUPERVISE DIRECT OR HAVE CONTROL OVER THE CONTRACTORS WORK NOR HAVE ANY RESPONSIBBJrY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS TECHNIQUES SEQUENCES OR PROCEDURES OF 1HE CONTRACTOR. IF THE OWNER DESIRES MORE EXTENSIVE PROJECT OBSERVATION OR FULL-TIME PROTECT REPRESENTATION, THE OWNER SHALL REQUEST SUCH SERVICES BE PROVIDED BY TCE AS ADDITIONAL SERVICES OWNER: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Budington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)860-1691 Fax: (802)860-1695 DESIGN BUILDER: '—' _------------- ReArch Company .- --�' -- - - _---_ _ _______ 30 Community Drive Suite 8 ---- - ------ South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)863.8727 Fax: (802)863.8734 ARCHITECT: - S2 Architecture _. 5224 Shelburne Rd. _ -- -- "'Ir'- Shelburne, VT 05482 ` -- _ ---------_------ � - Phone:(802)985.5595 _-W------ Fax: (802)986.5565 -- ---- - STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: —.. - '—Goldstein-Milano LLC 125 Main Street - Reading, MA 01867 Phone:(781)670-9990 Fax: (781)670-9939 CIVIL ENGINEER: Trudell Consulting Engineers 478 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)879.6331 --- ,."`------------------------------------------- Fax: (802)879-0060 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: BE Group 131 Church Street LOT 4 Burlington, VT 05401 Phone:(802)862-0096 Fax: (802)865-2440 MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box 525 43 Krupp Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)864-3800 Fax: (802)864-3904 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Omega Electric 25 Omega Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)862-0517 Fax: (802)862-4349 FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protection p� P.O. Box 2 1 Colchester,, VV T 05446 Phone:(802)878-6594 Fax: Fax: (802)878-21$6 //�. ®� DATE: 09/07/2007 seD 1 p �o SCALE: i"=30' C�C� 0®0)? REVISIONS 'jam ofs p� No. Date OK I Final City S0.iaslon 9-13-OJ �j�in9torl Graphic Scale Feet 30 0 30 60 90 t2o OF __J___ L I i 1 ' PROPOSED BIKE PART ] 20' WIDE EASEMENT nfi BIKE PATH DEDICATED TD I CITY OF so. BURLING'�jWJ t f I / t % t 1 a, f k v S 3A'LL AVENUE I _ _ a BE1ECiABLE- ---- -- - ---. LOT $ ' HIIVORTANT NOTESa 1. EXISTING CONTOUR INFORMATION BASED ON UDAR INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE STATE OF WBA40NT MAPPING DIVISION, DATED NOVEMBER 2004. 2. ADDITIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC GROUND SURVEYS CONDUCTED BY TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS. J. THE ROAD WIDENING AND PAVING SHALL BE COORDINATED WIN REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PUBLIC WORKS 4. WETLANDS HAVE BEEN DELINEATED BY OTHERS 20' CENTERED ON PATH EASEMENT � 2" BUUMNOUS AT BE REIkACEO C'ONC. PAVEMENT S•. AT —1 OR AREA TYPE III .111 ECRDN AREA WTIN A DRIVEWAY OR ROAD 2' TOPSOIL 1% %FT PITCH t/4'/kT PITCH 9 4 1 I \- MIRAn FILTER FABRIC 50OX —t2' GRAVCL 5lIHHASF, SEE SINE PLAN FOR TRADING AND PAIN LOCATION 2_� BIKE PATH SECTION TYPICAL IMMOA(l AVENEE ROA WMENM CEM"NMY a / a NEW BIKE PATH SON' _ �°° �► .ram'^""'� T ETlDS?,700 iEEI' AHEM' �`,^ I LOTS �— 20' WIDE EASEMENT F BIKE PATH DEDICATED CITY OF SO. BORLING� PROPOSED BIKE PATH i. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED BY TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (ICE) AND ARE INTENDED TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE STANDARD GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT. /C-700 PREPARED BY THE ENGINEERS JOINT CONTRACT DOCUMENTS COMMITTEE (EJCDC). LATEST EDITION. COPIES ARE AVAILABLE AT WWW.NSPEORG/EJCDC 2.UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND U77IJ77ES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED BASED ON RESEARCH, UTILITY PLANS PROVIDED BY OTHERS, AND/OR SURFACE EVIDENCE AVAILABLE AND WERE OBTAINED IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE ORDINARY STANDARD OF PROFESSIONAL CARE AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OWNER OR THE DESIGN ENGINEER. ..DIFFERING SUBSURFACE OR PHYSICAL CONDITIONS: IF CONTRACTOR BELIEVES THAT ANY SUBSURFACE OR PHYSICAL CONDITION AT OR CONTIGUOUS TO THE STE THAT IS UNCOVERED OR REVEALED E77NER: (1) IS OF SUCH A NATURE AS TO ESTABLISH THAT ANY 'TECHNICAL DATA' ON MICH CONTRACTOR RELIED IS MATERIALLY INACCURATE; OR (2) IS OF SUCH A NATURE AS TO REQUIRE A CHANGE IN THE PLANS/ CONTRACT DOCUMENTS; OR (3) DIFFERS MATERIALLY FROM THAT SHOWN OR INDICATED IN THE PLANS/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OR (4) IS OF AN UNUSUAL NATURE. AND DIFFERS MATERIALLY FROM CONDITIONS ORDINARILY ENCOUNTERED AND GENERALLY RECOGNIZED AS INHERENT IN WORK OF THE CHARACTER PROVIDED FOR IN THE PLANS/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ON THEN CONTRACTOR SHALL, PROMPTLY AFTER BECOMING AWARE THEREOF AND BEFORE FURTHER DISTURBING THE SUBSURFACE OR PHYSICAL CONDITIONS OR PERFORMING ANY WORK IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (EXCEPT IN AN EMERGENCY), NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER ABOUT SUCH CONDITION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT FlIRTIHER DISTURB SUCH CONDITION OR PERFORM ANY WORK IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (EXCEPT AS AFORESAID) UNTIL RECEIPT OF WRITTEN ORDER TO DO SO. 0.UTILITIES. PRIVATE AND PUBLIC UTILITIES SUCH AS ELECTRIC TELEPHONE. GAS CABLE, FIBER OPTIC ETC ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY. ANY INFORMA DON SHOWN BY ICE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY (USUALLY TO ASSIST WIR/ PERMITTING). FINAL DESIGN, .CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES COMPLIANCE WITH EASEMENTS AND REGULATIONS (STATE AND LOCAL) ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF RESPECTIVE U77UTY COMPANY. S.DIGSAFE: IN ACCORDANCE WITH VERMONT STATE LAW (VSA TITLE 30 CHAPTER 86 AND PSIS RULE 3,800) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO CONTACT DIGSAFE SYSTEMS, INC. "DIGSAFE" AT 1-888-344-7233 AT LEAST 48 HOURS . EXCLUDING SATURDAYS, SUNDAM AND LEGAL HOLIDAYS, BUT NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS BEFORE COMMENCING EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES, EXCEPT IN AN EMERGENCY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRE -MARKING THE STE AND MAINTAINING DESIGNATED MARKINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION ON DIGSAFE REQUIREMENTS SEE 6."577E SAFETY: NEITHER THE PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES OF TRUDEU CONSULTING ENGINEERS (ICE), NOR THE PRESENCE OF ICE OR ITS EMPLOYEES AND SUB CONSULTANTS AT A CONSTRUCTION SITE, SHALL RELIVE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ANY OTHER ENTITY OF THEIR OBLIGATIONS OUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDING OUT NOT LIMITED 70' CONSTRUCTION MEANS METHODS, SEQUENCE, TECHNIQUES OR PROCEDURES NECESSARY FOR PERFORMING, SUPERINTENDING OR COORDINA77NG ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK OF CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS REQUIRED BY ANY REGULATORY AGENCIES. ICE AND ITS PERSONNEL HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO EXERCISE ANY CONTROL OVER ANY CONSTRUCON TION CONTRACTOR OR OTHER ENTITY OR THEIR EMPLOYEES IN CONNECTION MIN THEIR WORK OR ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS. THE CLIENT AGREES THAT THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR JOBSTE SAFETY, AND WARRANTS THAT THIS INTENT SHALL BE MADE EVIDENT IN THE CLIENTS AGREEMENT WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. THE CLIENT ALSO AGREES THAT THE CLIENT, TCE AND TCE'S CONSULTANTS SHALL BE INDEMNIFIED AND SHALL BE MADE ADDITIONAL INSURED UNDER THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY. 7CODES AND STANDARDS COMPLIANCE: ICE. SHALL EXERCISE USUAL AND CUSTOMARY PROFESSIONAL CARE IN ITS EFFORTS TO COMPLY WTH CODES, STANDARDS REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES IN EFFECT. THE OWNER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT SUCH REQUIREMENTS MAY BE SUBJECT TO VARIOUS AND CONTRADICTORY INTERPRETATIONS ICE, THEREFORE, WILL ITS REASONABLE PROFESSIONAL EFFORTS AND JUDGMENT TO INTERPRET APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AS THEY APPLY TO THE PROJECT. TCE, HOWEVER, CANNOT AND DOES NOT WARRANT OR GUARANTEE THAT THE PROJECT WILL COMPLY WTI ALL INTERPRETATIONS OF SUCH REQUIREMENTS. 8.CONSTRUC77ON OBSERVATION: IM MAY VIST THE PROJECT AT APPROPRIATE INTERVALS DURING CONSTRUCTION TO BECOME GENERALLY FAMILIAR MITI THE PROGRESS AND QUALITY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK AND TO DETERMINE IF THE WORK IS PRECEDING IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS THE OWNER HAS NOT RETAINED ICE TO MAKE DETAILED INSPECTIONS OR TO PROVIDE EMAUS77W OR CONTINUOUS PROJECT RENEW AND OBSERVATION SERVICES ICE DOES NOT GUARANTEE 774E PERFORMANCE OF, AND SHALL NOT HAVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR, THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF ANY CONTRACTOR, SUB -CONTRACTOR, SUPPLIER OR ANY OTHER ENTITY FURNISHING MATERIALS OR PERFORMING ANY WORK ON THE PROJECT. TOE SHALL NOT SUPERWSE, DIRECT OR HAVE CONTROL OVER THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK NOR HAVE ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS TECHNIQUES SEQUENCES OR PROCEDURES OF THE CONTRACTOR. IF THE OWNER DESIRES MORE EXTENSIVE PROJECT OBSERVATION OR FULL-TIME PROJECT REPRESENTATION, THE OWNER SHALL REQUEST SUCH SERVICES BE PROVIDED BY ICE AS ADDITIONAL SERVICES l Technology Par 1 ;r9 Sou Tlttm >VT South t 1 i\ Lot 2 l OWNER: Technology Park Partners f 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington VT 05403 Phone: (802)860-1691 Pax: (802)860-1695 DESIGN BUILDER: \ ti_ � • 30 Community uite 8 ....... ,. -. - �,; , South url 05403 ......... ...- ''__ .. :: -- -8 (802)863727 ' Fex: (802)863-8734 Fax: ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture a 5224 Shelburne Rd. T 05482 g Shelburne, -_ Ph one:(802 ) 985.5595 Fax: (802)985-5565 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC 125 Main Street ' Reading, MA 01867 THISINSTALLRASEONLY AL FOR Phone:(781)670-9990 Fax: (781)670-9939 CIVIL ENGINEER: Trudell Consulting Engineers 478 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)879-8331 Fax: (802)879.0060 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: BE Group 131 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Phone:(802)862-0096 Fax: (802)865-2440 MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box 43 Krupp Drive Williston, VT 05495 01� (802)864-38 00 Fax: (802)864-3904 Fax: ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: /Q ® Omega Electric -an 25 Omega Drive - Williston, VT 05495 G�' Phone:(802)862-0517 Fax: (802)862-4349 l��jrO FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protection P.O. Box 2004 Colchester, VT 05446 Phone:(802)878-6594 Fax: (802)879-2186 DATE: 09/07/2007 SCALE: 1'=30' REVISIONS No. Dote i FIPPI City Subrrwk,n 9-13-07 — Graphic Scale DA Feet Jj 30 0 �30 60 90 T20 I 8 Technology Park South Brlulgton,VT r I �kl ; I �I I �I -+ i I ---- _ i 1 r l , II --_ '11 j 1 ,' •i i t ' EI ,i � Lot � iI I OWNER: Technology Park Partners lip30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 PP l EXIST SAN, MH 3 I ' Phone: (802 -1691 I Fax: (802)86060-1695 61 LOON a ID j •` i i I. I I`'� j l '` . I ,''- r w-3�0.3a (z) j i DESIGN BUILDER: l T I I Wi J10.24 I ,4 �' I I \ , ReArch Company j I i I n TYPE s O TYPE C I I j( �' s5t sAN. MH 4 I I 30 Community Drive Su to 8 ' i I O�1W0 �-3"09 I I i I `i rN orae+ ' -------- ----- South Burlington, VT 05403 I `. wwrTs ss. uoE sAN. MH s I I ; j I ♦ I OUT-34a7C, Phone:(802)863-8727 ' i , AaYgg apytr I w.341-33 , w Fax: (802)86M734 r Wr-341.45 I - - �-�--------------------- 7` ---------' - - - - - --------- --'t--i -�----'- -"----"---- ARCHITECT: I -- OR TS2 Architecture — 5224 Shelbume Rd. CAMM DRIVEShelbume. VT 05482 --- -- -tPhone: 802)9855595 R ''at TIOPE . o.moo - $ --- ---- - ---- --- -- 2- -=----- - Fax: (802)985-5565 7----_-------e ----tiJ+aO Goldstein -Milano LLC 1.----------------�-- ---- -- ------ ------- - - ----- TIME a --.. .- --- . -� 125 Main Sheet N°IDYTO AOD PROPOSE to I I I _SEE SITE PLAN Reading, MA 01867 AS STRUCTURES Ga TM a BOTH 410E5 UNDERORAN Os*NI.76uWDERORA9as ,-3+a3 PLUS4Nc e a"3111.88 I:I _ _-- _ T z FOR Phone:(781)670-9990 T _ SHEET SY ST 3 0431' ExxTWTc i ar .3Pze0 aAsaT 'rs-31Q{I' LO Fax: (781)670-9939 )/8 "PEfl'•INFORMATION 3"3e I CIVIL ENGINEER: FlR1ONAoR J2' WNIDE, ; Il` Ii 1 ; I; II I j1f j III I III \\? LOT 3 ---- � Trudell Consul ting Engineers Exls 1'xpT vsr L T2__ 478 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 30 Williston, VT05495LOT 4 el Uaphk Stale i =52 OwUT...I I —r Phone:(802)879-6331 Feet - I _ Fax: (802)879.0060 30 6 30 60 90 120 (,,) I, , ; .. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SE Group 131 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Phone:(802)862-0096 Fax: Fex: (802)865-2440 MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box 525 ^ Williston, Krupp VT 0 Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)864-3800 Fax: (802)864-3904 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Omega Electric 25 Omega Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802�62-0517 Fax: (802)862-4349 FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protection P.O. Box 2004 Colchester. VT 05W Phone:(802)878.6594 pie Fax: (802)878-2186 DATE: 09/07/2007 EXISTING 2 ----------------- SCALE: 1 "-30' REVISIONS No. Date PROPOSED 32' 1 Mal City Sub holm 9-13-07 WDENING `J�E toF r VE r7r7ji n I DA rggg; 0+00 1+00 zoo 3+00 4+00 8+00 0+00 7+00 P4 CAMPUS DRIVE - KA. 17JY HI HI PANT F1EV � J18.11 PANT STA . 3+39.53 PVT STA � 3+19.33 Pill ELEV . J81.S7 A.D. �-S.00aO v ��0� LOW PONT ET£V � JI2. LOW POINT STA . 0+2 PVT STA = 0+2C191'- J 9 %/' PN ELEV = JA2.78 A.D.. 8.0000=I!�a JDO 20' VC- .+- EXISTING - f1NISHEO "�$g w� g8 GRADE TwsTwc BAs9'I ' - yyff m (TYPIGIL Of 4) 4.7D9—- .-ay V------ -- -'/ d SDR 33 PVC JrB - - T.-Sz ..amoo EMSnNC WATER MAIN g hWR K � - INSTALL NEW CA aasRes xnH w MATCHING Ex6 Ts PIPE X 6L6V EwsnNc flBER OPTIC LINE EXISnNG - GRADE FINISHED GRADE 390.00 - -_ I ■ ■ ■ ■ ■) ■ i f'I III ■ ■ ■ ■ I■ � ■ oil ■ ■ ■ ■ i I f ■ ■ I� ■ ■ i ■I 7■I'RN i� �s I�r�esl I l STARMIZATiQN NOTE WINTER CONSTRUCTION NOTES SEEDING NOTE j ALL AREAS OF DISTURBANCE MUST HAVE TEMPORARY 1. A 25-FOOT BUFFER SHALL BE MAINTAINED ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO REMAIN VEGETATED SHALL OR PERMANENT STABILIZATION WITHIN DAYS AROUND ROUND PERIMETER CONTROLS. SUCH ASAS SILT FENCE. BE SEEDED AS A FINAL STABILIZATION MEASURE. ME INmAL DISTURBANCE. AFTER THIS TIME. ANY TO ALLOW FOR SNOW CLEARING AND MAINTENANCE TEMPORARY SEEDING SHALL BE APPLIED ACCORDING DISTURBANCE IN THE AREA MUST BE STABILIZED AT 2. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, DIVERSION SWALES, TO THE STABILIZATION NOTE ON THIS PAGE. SEE THE END OF EACH WORK DAY. SEDIMENT POND OUTLET SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF DETAIL #4 ON SHEET 07 FOR SEEDING SNOW AND ICE DAMS. SPECIFICATIONS. THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS APPLY.' 3. SILT FENCE REQUIRED IN PROPOSED DISTURBANCE DURING WINTER CONSTRVCnITN PERIODS REFER TO -STABILIZATION IS NOT REWIRED IF WORK IS TO AREAS MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE GROUND DETAIL /5 (DORMANT SEEDING) ON SHEET D7. CONTINUE IN THE AREA WITHIN THE NEXT O HOURS FREEZING. AND THERE -STABILIZATION PIS NOT REQU !N THE FORECAST. A NMEN STABILIZING LL MULCH, THE WINTER RRINGINS IS NOT REWIRED IF THE WORK IS APPLICATION RATE SHALL U 4 7�I5/ACRE. DURATION OF DISTURBANCE OCCURRING IN ASELF-CONTAINED EXCAVATION TE MULCHED SHALL BE THOROUGHLY TRACKED USING NO .HOUSE WITH A TIONDEPTHE OF 2 FEET OR GREATER TRACK MACHINERY UNTIL MULCH I5 ADEQUATELY CLASSIFICATION ORDER TOB NDERR THE A u RISK ( .q. HOUSE FOUNDATION EXCAVATION, UTILITY ANCHORED• 11-gQUNDER THE CONSTRUCTION GENERAL TRENCHES). S. TO ENSURE COVER O' DISTURBED SOIL TU PERMIT MAXIMUM DISTURBED AREAS SHALL RI LIMITED ADVANCE OF A MELT EVENT, AREAS OF DISTURBED TO A MAXIMUM FINAL 7 DAYS OF EXPOSURE PRIOR TO DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE TRACKED SOIL MUST WITH HSTABILIZEDFOLLOWING AT THE END OF EACH TEMPORARY OF FNAL STABILIZATION: SOME PERPENDICULAR N THE SLOPE IN ORDER TO PROVIDE WORK DAY WITH THE FOLLOINNG EXCEPTIONS: SOME C01APN SHE AND TO ALLOW (RACK A. IF NO PRECIPITATION W 4 H 24 HOURS IS DEPRESSIONS TO SLOW RATE OF RUNOFF. SEE FORECAST AND WORK WILL RESUME IN THE SAME DETAIL /I ON SHEET 07. DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN 24 HOURS, GAILY DISTURBED R IS NOT NECESSARY. B.. DISTURBED AREAS THAT COLLECT AND RETAIN INSPECTION NOTE RUNOFF, SUCH AS BUILDING FOUNDATIONS OR OPEN UTILITY TRENCHES REWIRE STABILIZATION ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL AT THE END OF EACH WORK WEEK. MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED BY OR UNDER THE B. PRIOR TO STABILIZATION. SNOW SHALL BE DIRECTION OF THE ONSTE PLAN COORDINATOR Ai REMOVED TO A DEPTH OF LESS THAN ONE INCH. - LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS, AND 7' THE BUILDING SHALL HAVE AN ONE AS SOON AS POSSBLE BUT NO LATER THAN R CONSTIOFTROFTUCTION ON STONE TRAFFIC I A STRIP WHERE -� HOURS AFTER ANY STORM EVENT WINCH GENERATES 8. ALL VEHICLE TRAFFIC IS E TRACKEDD. A DISCHARGE aF STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE a. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE TRACKED CONSTRUCTION SHE ACCORDING AI DETAIL jT ON SHEET D]. 9. SEE DETAIL /l5 ON SHEET 07 FOR sPECIFlCAnONS ON DORMANT QNSITE PLAN COORDINATOR TO BE DECIDED 10. AREAS WITHS NMING0 FEET OF A WATER RESOURCE iSTJWETLAND, POND, ETC.) SHALL HAW A RWROW OF SILT FENCE, OR A SINGLE ROW OF REINFORCED SILT FENCE liw .iv s ---ii=ii---- - _ vuu.......oA=..a... AC.o.� STONE BAD INLET PROTECTION (Tw"L) -_. 1 _ -- SILT FENCE ] (TYPICAL) Db I� T MA/ C IN GREEN BLANKET SHADED) _ i _ 5 neA+ CH Ut I - sut Technology Park South Burbagton, VT I F LOT 2 I 1 r i ; , 1 1 OWNER: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 --._- South Burlington, VT 05403 1 Phone:(802)860-1691 ' I Fax: (802)860-1695 DESIGN BUILDER: ReArch Company I 30 Community Drive Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: 802 863-8727 Fax: (802)863-8734 ARCHITECT: I I O S2 Architecture .,... 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne, VT 05482 1 1 Phone:(802)9855595 Fax: (802)985-5565 (/ �f ti./ STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: ' Goldstein -Milano LLC o ' / 125 Main Street a i ) Reading, MA 01867 �--- O o�i Phone:(781)670-9990 -' • i /� Fax: (781)670-9939 CIVIL ENGINEER: �� O Trudell Consul ng Engineers i I15;0 ry 478 Blair Park Road I ' (f P.O. Box 308 (7 Williston, VT05496 r' R ,— I lafY v~"•,��•- ` "(//y Phone:(802)879.6331 OA - - Fax: (602)879-0060 U •/ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: ,( g iA r- ' 4 )il Y SE Group 131 Church Street Burlington. VT 05401 PhoI 1 11 r (802)862-0098 I �. , '•�..-_.-_.-_.- _.. Fax:ne.(802)865-2440 MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc I ... P.O. Box 525 43 Krupp Drive Williston, VT 05495 i Phone:(802)864.3800 Fax: (802)864-3904 • ; ) ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Omega Electc nve i 1 ' Omega D Williston, VT 05495 Phon 802 2-0517 ' Fax: (802)862.4349 ' FIRE PROTECTION: i i 1 North Country Fire Protection -�- .. ` i 1 ,- •;... P.O. Box 2004 Colchester, VT05W Phone:(802)878.6594 1 I• I i �' Fax: (802)878-2186 III DATE: 09 f 07 f 2007 SCALE: 1"-30' t� REMSIONS Date 1 1' T I FT-1 CRY Subminl° 9-13-07 x i I _ 1 X� I � L �. .r, L �I Imo.---��i,.��' 1 \' -----= __� L' W VI T/►�/I��„�� .----'i= Plan EPSC 1 PSC2f TCH LINE 1 AVEMIE Mao PROPOSED (r1 aW(EPATH a 477 ` NOW-, W.,LG' J %J Graphic Scale Feet 30 0 30 60 90 120 41, 'a MATQH UNE 2Ei�scil - (' i woo WINTER CONSTRUCTION NOTESCONSTRUCnON NOS 1. A 25-FOOT BUFFER SHALL BE MAINTAINED ' / t AROUND PERIMETER CONTROLS SUCH AS SILT FENCE / + O TO ALLOW FOR SNOW CLEARING AND MAINTENANCE 0 2. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES EVERSION SWALES ' f SEDIMENT POND OUTLET SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF SNOW AND ICE DAMS. 3. SILT FENCE REQUIRED IN PROPOSED DISTURBANCE TOGROUN AREAS MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR THE GROUND ,! FREEZING /'�� ,• '/ /{/ 4. WHENG. STABILIZING WITH MULCH, THE WINTER APPLiCARON RATE SHALL THOROUGHLY 4 TONS/ACRE. TRACKED SHALL BE ILMLCHI TRACKED USINGTRACK ANCHORED MACHINERY UNTIL MULCH IS ADEQUATELY 5. TO ENSURE COVER OF DISTURBED SOIL INh- ADVANCE OF A MELT EVENT, AREAS OF DISTURBED SOIL MUST BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH STABILIZATION NOTE WORK DAY, WITH THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS: A. IF NO PREDPITA17 K17HIN 24 HOURS IS ALL AREAS OF DISTURBANCE MUST HAVE TEMPORARY FORECAST AND WORK WILL RESUME KJ THE SAME OR PERMANENT SrABILTZATIoN MTiHN 14 DAYS OF j fir DISTURBED AREAS MIT 24 HOURS. THE THE W117AL DISTURBANCE. AFTER THIS TIME, ANY f �. t`r STABILIZA 17CN IS NOT NECESSARY. DISTURBANCE IN THE AREA MUST BE STABILIZED AT Y j`' / B. DISTURBED AREAS THAT COLLECT AND RETAIN THE END OF EACH WORK DAY.If RUNOFF, SUCH AS BUILDING FOUNDATIONS OR OPEN UDLITY TRENCHES, REWIRE STABILIZATION THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS APPLY. AT THE END OF EACH WORK WEEK -STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED IF WORK IS TO `� J 6. PRIOR 70 STABILIZATION, SNOW MALL BE CONTINUE IN THE AREA WITHIN THE NEXT 24 HOURS REMOVED TO A DEPTIi DF LESS T H AN ONE INCH. AND THERE 1S NO PRECIPITATION IN THE FORECAST. / ( 7. THE BUILDING SHALL HAVE AN ADJACENT -STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED IF THE WORK IS INSPECTION NOTE TOSS 2GFT WOE STONE STABILIZA TIDN STRIP WHERE OCCURRING IN A SELF-CDN'TAwED EXCAVATION (Le. ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLE DAR RAFFICAREAS IS ANTICIPATED. NO OUTLET) WITH A DEPTH OF 2 FEET OR GREATER MEASURES SHALL BE INSPECTED BY OR UNDER THE S=]N-O NOTE A ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL T TRACKED (e.g. HOUSE FOUNDATION EXCAVATION, U77UTY DIRECTION OF THE ONSITE PLAN COORDINATOR AT ACCORDING AI DETAIL 11 ON SHEET 07. 7RENCHES). DURAiT®N DiS•,i•URBAN�•E A. SEE DETAIL p5 ON SHEET 07 FOR SPECIFICATIONS TIONS LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (N) CALENDAR DAM AND ALL SEEDED AS AREAS TO REMAIN VEGETATED SHALL oN DORMANT SEEDING AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BUT NO LATER THAN 24 BE SEEDED AS A FINAL STABILIZATION MEASURE. 10. AREAS WITHIN 100 FEET OF A WATER RESOURCE DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE TRACKED HOURS AFTER ANY STOW EVENT WHICH GENERATES TEMPORARY SEEDING SHALL BE APPLIED ACCORDING IN ORDER TO OBTAINAETAW A 'LOW RISK' (STREAM, WETLAND, POND, Era) SHALL HAVE A PERPENDICULAR TO THE SLOPE IN ORDER TO PROVIDE q DISCHARGE OF STORMWAIER RUNOFF" FROM lliE i TO THE STABIUZARON NOTE ON THIS PACE SEE CLASSIFlCARON UF/DER THE CONSTRUCTION GENERAL - DOUBLE ROW OF SILT FENCE, OR A SINGLE ROW OF SOME COMPACTION AND AT ALLOW TRACK CONSTRUCTION 511E. DETAIL 14 ON SHEET D7 FOR SEEDING PERMIT 3-g020, DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE LIMITED REINFD2CE0 SILT FENCE DEPRESSIONS m SLOW RATE OF RUNOFF. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. TO A MAXIMUM OF 7 DAYS OF EXPOSURE PRIOR TO DETAIL 11 ON SHEET D7. ONSITE PLAN COORDINATOR: TO BE DECIDED f DURING WINTER CONSTRUCTION PERIODS REFER TO TEMPORARY OF FINAL STABILIZATION. DETAIL 15 (DORMANT SEEDING) ON SHEET D7. Technology Park South Burlington, VT LOT 2 OWNER Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, Vr 05403 ' Phone: (802)860-1691 Fax: (802)860-1695 - - - --� DESIGN BUILDER: ReArch Company -- - ---- " 30 Community Drive Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)863-8727 Fax: (802)863-8734 T ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne, VT05482 Phone:(802)985-5595 - — Ri`---- Fax: (802)985.5565 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC 125 Main Street Reading, MA 01867 --- Phone:(781)670-9990 Fax: (781)670.9939 " CIVIL ENGINEER: ' x = Trudell Consulting Engineers Ng 478 Blair Park Road sx - P.O. Box 308 Will Teton, VT 05495 Phone:(802)879-6331 wo Fax: (802)879-0060 ------ ---- --- ~- LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SE Group 3 131 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 ' - - - •••' -"' '" '"' Phone:(802)862-0098Fax: (802)865-2440 MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box �\ A Krupp Drive Williston, Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)864-3800 _� Fax: (802)8643904 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: f' yQ f -Z�r1 Omega Electric 25 Omega Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)062-0517 Fax: (802)862-4349 �altrx DAM Q y<FIRE PROTECTION: os North Country Fire Protection P.O. Box 2004 Colchester, VT 05446 -•- --% �` Phone:(802)878-6594 r. _ �� ,..— - Fax: (802)878-2186 DATE: 09/07/2007 _- ' - SCALE: REVISIONS Pffaivar OE1WgiDAffi1N/ /- No. Date -'f gns OF dSnMBANCE p6 (T}PIDAL) { Final My SubmiaWon 9-13-07 ayrQ�r%ri � A `rarairara'rai rriiripr a4T rarii arir r: � � 1Ya � �'9pai r ��4ri.�1r 1 j:0 W 44% - NqW� 'WATER' CAST W COVER WATER FMISIED GRADE CALMED CAST RO)I TWO PIE, (SUP TmE) vuK eox wM FLAMlEO r0P @ u0 ALL 977WO ARE . HAVE WQ,1-U/G' RETAINER GLANDS 6• IVA" -� IT-T�II TAPPING SLEEVE OVER EESTING WATER MAIN POMERSEAL J41KWJ OR APPROVED EWAL --TAPPING { MA PINY BARRIFF VALVE (AWWA -1) CORPORAZ OR STOP )FSnNC GMORIDGE 1 IiI f ; �3/4' s1avE BeoarlG =MI�I 1=1I = i I I-L=1Zf-m--T=1IM11=I I I II =I I Ifj-III- I I I1=I I I -I I 1� I I-1 Y= l-T_I I1=1 I_I I-T_I I I I� I I_I MOTE: CONTRACTOR M APPLY TO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT FOR WAMB LIME TAPPING PEMaE CONTRACTOR M SUBMIT COMPLETE SREOFlCARON ON --OARS O CONCRETE' MR UST BLOCK (REFER M THRUST BLOCK TABLE MATERIALS w. PERMIT APPUCAPON. CO`'TRACMT M PRESSURE TEST TAPPING SLEEVE M 100 PST PRIOR M TAP. FOR SIZE) TYPICAL TAPPING VALVE J/4"sl'-oVALVE I00] RI.DE11 NI16UI,TIHI ENtlNRR4 LA4I AENSFD M J ) WIN-CO.� US fAA55 D (25W PS) CONCRETE FOR THRUST BLOaOS PUCE 4 4x. PO.YEMYLENE BETWEEN FliTMC AND .Rust BLOOr. PLACE THRUST BLOCK ACNN51 UNOSTIURBED TRENGI WALL - CCWC.QETE BEARING AREA ON PITTING TO BE A NHIMUM OF 1/2 SQUARE FOOT. THRUST BLOCKS BASED ON 200 PSI WORKING PRESSURE PLUS SURGE ALLOWANCE OF 100 M. 80' ELBOW TEE 221' ELBOW 45' ELBOW EK7END 5' DIM GP W/ NECN. JONi TREA'al WALL NOTE: FOR RFOUCERS PROVIDE TRENCH WALL, ITTACAL BEARING AREA FOR ME SOIL IN sI BASED ON 8000 POUNDS _ IIHasTURBEo sa4 FaR Gw 2 WCN REOJcncw W szE. M'IGAL CAP REDUCER .. ,...re MINIMUM BEARING AREA IN SQUARI' FE I n FNrH -11 Sol SAFE BEARING r. Y @ 4' 1 8• B' 10• 12' TYPE LOAD lssIrr. B3• 1 u• 22s• >a Io• u• 22.5' WE 1D• 1 N• 2z.s ,rF Fxr 1 0• zz.s Rr ao• 4a• 12,• CLAY 1000 SO 7.0 4.0 20 105 1S SO 0.0 1S0 250 140 70 28.0 JS0 21.0 f05 56.0 300 110 SAND GRAVEL 2000 3000 is 20 15 23 20 1.5 1.0 1.0 S6 13 7.5 SO 40 10 20 1.7 9.0 6.0 110 AS 7.0 SO 15 As 14.0 M.0 1" 125 10.0 7.0 SO 43 11.0 20.0 130 27.5 1S5 iS0 ;AO SO SO POLL SHALE ROOD 10000 1.5 as 20 1.0 I'D 0.3 0.5 0.5 10 To AO 65 20 1.0 1.0 as 45 20 6.3 25 15 1.5 20 1.0 7.0 10 0.5 15 SO 20 25 1.0 I0.0 40 f40 SS 7.5 10 CO 1.5 �� t.RM� R..w R..4{� 4AQA R.A4✓� 6.. �//��;p�`s//-IIII III- rl ... ��!?: !a.. '}.��.1'� •�l t; .,:�`�/�� IIII III . • r,^� r �,� =nuounonu_La/'v/'o/-�%�%%%%`/%IIII=''' ' III=IIII=IIII=IIII":�� 0:�� O%�O%�O�I =IIII NIN PVC WATER MEN ARON C-I00) IIJJ'' ,_. PVCDArA R MAIN WON m O WATER MAIN /ANIMA-CI51.31) p CLA55 32 (SEE S V PUN FOR 512E @ TINE) MIM 112' COARSE SAND @ GRAVEL T UNSUITABLE MATERIAL IS REMOVED REPLACE WITH MATERIAL RENEWED BY ENGINEER. COMPACT M 959 DENSITY 2 TYPKAL WATER TRENCH r iMNfiL LM'SIp.TIHI [YWWLTRS In9T EEVLWD oA/o5/OT WR-049Y� CROSSINGS: SEWERS CROSSNC WATER MAWS SHALL BE LAD BENEAM THE VIER- Q. MAKE BETWEEN THE WTSDE ON THE SEWER AND THE WMG1 Of ME WARR MAIN. WHEN 11 IS IMPOSSIBLE M MAINTAIN THE 18" VERTICAL. SEPARATION OR WERE 1) ME CROSSING SHALL BE ARRANGED SO MAT ONE PL I. LENGM DT SEVER IS CENMMFD ABOVE OR BELOW THE WATER LINE w. SEWER JGNiS AS TAR AS POSSIBLE FRGA WATER -TS; 2) THE SEWER PIPE MUST BE CONSTRUCTED M WATER MAW STANDARDS FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE 0' 20 FEET E.ER 510E OT TIE CROSSING OP A MT. fT THREE PIPE LENGTHS, WNMHEKR 11 GREATER. J) THE SECTION CONSTRUCTED M WATER MAW STANDARDS MUST BE PRESSURE TESTED TO MAINTAIN 30 PSI FOR 15 MWUMS WITHOUT LEAKAGE PRIM M BACKFIUNG BEYOND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE PIPE M ASSURE WATER TIGHTNESS, 4) WHERE A WATER MAW CROSSES UNDER A SEVER, ACEOUATE STRUCTURAL SUPPORT SHALL PRONGED FOR .E SELLER M PREVENT DAMAGE TO THE WATER MAIN. lk AETC NUT. COVNTERCI0CKNIS PROVIDE HYDRANT RERECTOR FLAG M OPEN WAY HYDRANT. AWWA C-302 MUELL R SUPER CENTUPoW 250 NOTES _�-J OR EQUAL RGTAM HYDRANT BODY FOR PROPER ALIGNMENT FOR SOUTH HYDRANT SHALL -�-�-- AS Offil BY MWIN WATER SUPERINiENOEIIT. MUELGTON. BE 14. O A MUELLER CENTURION • KDRAINS OR zi SHALL. LUGGEDWATEROUS PACER. ALL DRAINS SHALL BE PLUGGED PRIOR TD INSTALLATION. -"'��--- fINISIEO CRAOE �Q CAST )RON TIME PIECE(SUP TVI VMATED ALK BOX w. FLANGED BURY LINE ELEVATION NARK - AMA CIS COMPLIANT GTE VALVE KENNEDY MODEL KS-RW 515 W APPROVED EQUIVALENT PUCE r CY. OF -lu CRUSHFD STONE - - - SWIVEL JOINT HYDRANT TEE AWWA C-f 11 - USE 4 WL PO.WVN NE BETWEEN ALL FITTINGS AND CONCRETE R HYDRANT ASSEMBLY HAS ALL RTTMG5 M HAVE MEGA LUG RETAINING GLANDS DRAIN PORT PLUG IT AND ASSURE PORT IS NOT COVERED wM CONOLETE ANGDR UNDISTURBED EAR. THRUST BLOCK COUPLING THRUST BLOCK GLASS D CON CR M .RUBY BLOCK - 100 SO FT. BEARING AREA CLASS' D CONCRETE . ... .: ,.r.. AD SQL 1,, BEARING AREA - d/4' CRUSHED STONE 12 MINWUN FIRE PROTECTION HYDRANT J/4•_t•_D• IIu TN�aLA mISN.TRG FMIWR�s ovnJN) WR-aax FOR PAVED AREAS /- FDR GRASSED AREAS /�/� aNc vuK eox w. u0 NOT. AREA OF BEARING AGAINST uNUSTJ EAR. SHALL BE THE SAME AS FOR WY BEND .RUST BLOCK (SEE .RUST BLOCK TABLE) B' NNMUM LTD /--MUELLEF.10^ INSERNNG VALW - 2 112'I 318" STEEL STRAP SHAPED M VALK 1 44 PO.YElN/1ENE BETWEEN VALK AND CONCRETE GROUT AFTER STRAP AND VALVE I ARESECURED IN PLACE _ J/18• aA aTu Nlx, c 1-1 11-1 I I-M I 1- -I I Ed 1191- '�M�II��II�5��.�I��II��. III -I �a"'j!'E�'Grwv00% -III ,Y,NrnsluweTQ e,<�Ii`/ ,�31 iTNBERT VALVE ALL FITTING ARE M HAZE 'AEG -LUG' RETAINER Mmos -_--.-_ 'WATER' CAST IN COVER S \ watER ' - -- iIN9E0 MADE WATED CAST ROI TWO PIECE ��--- 9I,P TINE VALK BON w. GP @ LD 6' MWMUM ' Y OPERATING NUT TURN COUNTER GL_.sE m OPEN GATE VALVE f- AWWA C515 COMPUANT GATE VALVE MODEL KS-RW OR APPROVED EGOVALENT i-- I EaHANCN. JOINT CONNECTION MEGA-UGS AT ALL MECNAWCAL JOINT CONNECTIONS 3/4- CRUSED STONE REDOING NOTE: REFER M WIN AL TOWN SPECIFlGTIONS FOR SPECITIC MANUFACTURER. A. PRIOR M BEING PUT WM SANCE WATER MANS SHALL BE aSNFECTED ACCORDING M THE LATEST EDITION ' ANIMA SPECIFlCATION C-651. THE TABLET METHOD W ANIMA STANDARD 651 IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. B. THE NEW LINE SHALL BE FLUSHED AT A VELOCITY GF NOT LESS MAN Z5 FEET PER SECOND (OPEN 2-1/2 INCH HYDRANT CONNECTIOJ} FLUSH FOR A PERMM DETERMINED BY ME ENONEER FOR THE LENGTH OF MAIN M BE DISINFECTED. C. CIILONNAMW SHALL BE ACCOLWISHED BY WTRODUONG A HIPOOHLORITE SOLUTION WITH A CONCFFIMDOI OF GREATER MAN 25 PARTS PER MILLION OF FREE CHLORINE. D. USING A NOZZLE AT EACH END HYDRANT CONMW THE RATE ON FLOW INM THE NEW MAN AND PROPORTIONALLY FEED THE HYPOCHLCRITE SOLUMM WM THE MAIN. AFAR ME CHLORINE HAS REACHED ALL POINTS IN ME SYSTEM, CLOSE THE VALVE SUPPLYING WATER FROM TIE EIDSTWG MAIN AND THE END HYDRANTS. MAINTAIN THE HEAVILY CHLORINATED WATER IN THE NAW FOR 24 HOURS DURING INCH NNE ALL MAW UK VALVES SHOULD BE OPERATED. AFTER 24 HOURS THE MIRWM CHLORINE RESIDUAL MUST BE AT LEAST 10 PARTS PER MILLION. E FLUSH HEAVILY CHLOINAMD WATER FRO/ THE ILK AMID REFILL THE LINE FOR SERVICE (USE ONLORINE aFTIISFR). TAKE AND SUBMIT TWO BA MIKL0OCAL SAMPLES OF THE WA B . TIE STATE OF1ERMON . IF THE RESULTS ARE ONSATUSACTORY. THE DISINFECTION PROCEDURE BILL BE REPEATED URM SATISACTORY RESULTS ARE OBTAINED. F PLASHED WATER RL STORAGE STRUCTURES SNABE DISNFECILD IN ACCDRDANCE WTH CURRENT AWWA STANDARD CAAT TWO OR MORE SUCCESSIVE SETS OF SAMPLES TAKEN AT 24 HOUR WMRVA S, SHALL INOGTE MICRMIGLOGILI SATISFACTORY WATER BEFORE THE FACILITY IS PLACES INM OPERATION. C DISPOSAL O' WAVILY CHLORINATED WATER FROM NE TANK OISIVFECTIOI PROCESS SHALL BE IN ACCORM N. WM THE REQUIREMENTS a THE SECRETARY. THE OSIIECTION PROCEMWE (AWWA CHLORINATION METHOD 1 SECTION 4.3 0632)) BHMH ALLOWS USE OF THE CHLORINATED WATER HELD W THE STORAGE TANK FOR OSNFECTiON PURPOSES IS NOT RECOMMENDEDWHEN MAT PROCEDURE IS USED, IT IS REWIRED THAT THE INITIAL HEAVILY WLORINAIED WATER BE PROPERLY DISPOSED IN UNDER M PREVENT RELEASE OF WATER WHICH MAY CONTAW VARIOUS CHLORWAIED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS INTO THE DISTRRIFDON Sysi DISINFECTION OF WATER SYSTEM L.Xr REMSID miJ1rn WIR-m45 -STING 10' VALVE THRUST BLOCK I / 1 NEW Y D.I. 1 I I I 1 -- yyy4 I 1 B' TAPPING VALK Dt - 910' INSERT VALK ALL UNINTERRUPTED SEP11" M TECHNOLOGY CENTER OPTION I 10' 0.1. PPE LXO EDSMD1 IG 10' VALK 4 THRUST BLOCK NEW NF OIL. I 1 I I yy1 I 1 1 DI B' Ill,10' GTE VALVES C REQUIRES AGREEMENT w. TECHNOLOGY CENTER ON NE SHUT DOO" SEANCE OPTION 2 CONNECTION TO MUNICIPAL WATER TESTING WATER MAINS A. AFTER THE PRE HAS BEEN UD AND 7 DAYS AREA THE CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKS AND ANCHORS HAW BEEN PLA2D. THE WATER MAW SHALL BE HYDROSTATICALLY TESTED ACCORDING TO THE LATEST EOTKW W THE A- SPECIFlCATION C-600. a CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY ALL NECESSARY APPARATUS M PERFORM THE HYDROSTATIC TEST. C TEST PRESSURE SHALL S g92 PUNJOS PER SQUARE INCH OR 15 BARES ME WORKING PRESSURE MEASURED AT OR NEAR THE HIGH PONT IN THE SYSTEM, NHICHEKR IS GR,MB. TEST SHALL BE A MINIMUM a' 2 NOURS IN DURATION. TESTING ALLOWANCE SHALL BE OEFINE AS THE WANT" OF MAKEUP WATER MAT MUST BE SUPFLED WM THE NEWLY LAID PPE OR ANY VALVED SECTION HEREOF TO MAINTAIN PRESSURE wMW 5 PST (345 VPP) ON THE SIECUMD VEST PRESSURE AFTER ME PPE HAS BEEN FILLED WITH WATER AND THE AR NAS BEEN E11PELLED. TESTING ALLOWANCE SHALL NOT BE MEASURED BY A DROP IN PRESSURE W A TEST SECTION OVER A PERIOD G TINE. D. .E PROJECT ENONEER AND THE MUNICIPALITY SHALL BE CONTACTED 4B HOURS PRIOR TO TESTING. E. ALL VALVES SHOULD BE VERIFIED AS BEING OPEN OR CLOSED AS APPROPRIATE FOR ME PORTION OF ME WATER MAW BEING TESTED. F ALLOWABLE (fmAGF SHALL BE COMPUTED BY THE FiYMg4A: L-(S A D ArP)/InDw WERE, L IS LEAKAGE IN GALLONS PER HOUR, s IS TM LENG. Gil` PIPE TESTED IN FEET. D Is THE NOMINAL DIAMETER ON .E PPE IN INCHES AND P IS THE AVERAGE TEST PRESSURE IN POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH WRING THE LEST. G REPLACE AND RETEST ANY WORK FOND TO BE DEFECTIVE AT NO EXPENSE M OWNER. TESTWG HYDRANTS A AFTER TESTING THE WATER MAWS, OPEN THE HYDRANT FULL AND FILL w. WATER M PREVENT CAPS FRCP BEING SLOW OF, VENT Atli FROM ONE ON THE CAPS WHILE IT IS OEM FTLLEO WEN ALL THE AR HAS ESCAPED. TIGHTEN THE CAP. B ALLOW THE PRESSURE M BUILD UP M MAW UK PRESSURE AND CHECK FOR LEAKAGE AT RANGES, NI= S AND ME OPERATING STEM, C CLOSE THE HYDRANT, REMOVE ONE MOTILE CAP AND PUG' THE PA. O YOUR NANO OVER ME OPENING MANAGE SHOULD CREATE A NOTICEABLE SUCTION q TESTING WATER MAiNS AND HYDRANTS N 1WwBA cWNWFLTWc Lrxxma sT IENPm OVWV7WAR-alas CWD SPEWICAT/ONs Technology Park b� (PARTIAL LLST�VG) WATITR M1FM C110N NOTES PER :EC1,1C AND South Burlington, VT -TILWlS WATERS RNTHETHE INSTALFANON OF PARR OWES ANU ON SYSNANC£5' FCR ALL Y CRT ME SYSTEMS OWED BY CN). M, Lot 2. AND ILA AGE 1 BURLINTHE AND LION OF THE CONTRACTON LL, REVIEW SNARL RENEW LAND 9ECW�ONS. PEaAREMENrs -_ CONS RU PAIR ro CDN RLDLAR Pa . a ME _ LNEEilrs Is WaGTED Baow rae ME - OWNER: CONDUM,M,s CWKNENCE Technology Park Partners ME PROECi SMALL BECOKITILI CIXOPERATE 30 Community Drive Suite 4 '•7 VAWTNN % AACWlK) C AWI WA1E0 W CANS, wM THIE ARPROKD South Burlington, VT OUO3 n9 PIEIS CHANDFS SHALL BE AIDE IN M PRO.ELT wMWT Phone: (002)860.1691 TIE WXTTEM APPROVAL (E 11E REAAIIL GRID suaRINTEKONc Fax: (802)660-1895 ALL WATER MAWS ,-IrrENANCEs AND G_ DESIGN BUILDER: TERIALS, AND DONS 01N MEMOOS SHALL CGNRRM M >HL ReArch Company HOST RECENT EDITION OF ALL APPUCABIE A A STAM AND 30 Community Drive Suite 8 LOCAL CODES, STNGARUS AND REGRATIOM$ AND THE ti7 PALER ,RULE South Burlington, VI' 05403 W tAg a coNiHcr eETNEEN MESA Phone:(602)863-6727 CONSTRUCTION M." AND SPEGFlGTDNS AND A CODE OR Fax: (802)863-8734 REWLATTON, IT SNALL BE wSOVED M w SAwAGMPI ME C. IEYA ARCHITECT: .PEMNTENOENT. S2 Architecture APPLICANT, DEVELOPER ON LR OF RECORD SNAIL 5224 Shelburne Rd. PROCURE ALL PERWIS. LK2NSES AND EASOMENn MAT MAY BE Shelburne, VT 05462 REWIRED . COMPLETE PLANNED cWSTRIIcr.,'W". Phone:(802)985.5595 AYAENT OF ALL IPPUG aE ms. Fax: (802)985-5565 AT (EAST SEEN (7) WAYS BEFORE TIE sARr o Ac covsTRuc_ G ARY OTWHTEs STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: aR IPROKMFNm THE APPLICANT, Goldstein -Milano LLC ENGINEER. OWNER GR __MR SHALL MODIFY WE CWO RETAIL 125 Main Street w SUPERINTENDENT Noo"`o�E.woF SHAD ARRANGE A MEETWa w. Reading, MA 01867 THE CID RE_ DEPARTMENT Phone:(781�70-9990 D OT.w AND/OR WATER SYSENGINEER APPLICANT. ENGIEUI. AND THE Fax: (781)670-9939 CGNrRACTGe ro asWs rrrt PIRA{LT. THE APPLCANT DEw.aPER OR CNIL ENGINEER: OWNER . RECORD, OrMING GINWG APPROVAL OF PLANS BY Trudell ConsultingEngineers THE CwT RETAIL SUPERINTENDENT, SHALL BE KSPGN-E FOR ANY 478 Blair Park Road PERMIT ISSUED OR WORK P.D. Box 308 COMPLIED UNDERTM ESE SP-a E PSNAUL Williston, VT 05495 OR OWNER SHALL K -,. OR EEP Cw) RETAIL SUPQINIENDENT A.- Dr TIE A-. ro Phone:(802)879-6331 WHICH BILs. NOTICES. AND OTHER CONMURNCAiIONS ARE ro BE Fax: (802)879.0060 oEJKREO. GN) S'ECWGTIONS (INRTAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: R"ER iO a BE Group -LI DONDND S NOTED AfDK. 131 Church Street ME LOUD ENOINL DmARTMEMr W ADVANCE ro INSPECT ALL MECNE JOINT Burlington, VT 05401 TA' APP",NTENANNDIIA � WATER LINE Phone:(802)862A096 rnosslNGs PRIOR M Gar TILLING. Fax: (802)865-2440 Ifff Cw) RETAIL DEPARTMENT SHALL BE NOWBD NO LESS MAN 1MO (A2�) WOF AN DRrs WAAOVD MECHANICAL ENGINEER: ev TINE PRR�cT ENLaNEER1EDANDS New England Air Systems Inc. A. BEALL TEiO� iNES4 P.O. Box 525 I AT ANY TME o G 43 Krupp Drive 'DINS-c- THE cwo RETAIN sLIPFNWTEMOETIT nut Ems Williston, VT 05495 OPER MA RmAIS EWWWENT 11 BEING Umr2ESD Phone:(802)884-3800 E T- - S TU «!T IN _TN;Fax: (802)864-3904 CORRECTED AT ONCE MIS MAY .USE YHHARO PL�NLVWC ro" M ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: CLWIPUMCE ME CWD RETAIL SUPERWRNUENT Omega Electric RESERVES ME RIGHT M DIRECT NNE GGNMACMR M 'uc LED- 25 Omega Drive Raw EMPOeN is NOT A, Williston, VT 05495 PRIOR APPROVAL INSPECTION, Phone:(802)862-0517 AT THE CONTRACMRS EAPEHSE. UPON COMPLETION 0' w WATER Fax: (802)862-4349 sAns-eluTs' S ALL,BE SUW`Ul. ED FIRE PROTECTION: TO NNE CYIO w- DEPARNENT W THE FORA' a•(�O)NE (I) HARD North Country Fire Protection -v INNAUTDD-CAO.DD. VERSOI P.O. Box 2004 ns-eiN4TS ARE w wixl.NL�E _w Colchester, VT 05446 A. TE GAS n o AND MANUFACTURER DATE - - CO Phone:(802)878-6594 vuKs EWAL AC®TANCE AfRR A Fax: (802)878-2186 ONE -YAM WARRANTY PEFIm. 9RAIL NOT iANE PLACE UNTIL NNE DATE: 09/07/07 CTw RETAIL swERWTEHIENr HAS, DETERMINED THAT ME WAVER SYSTEM AS-6URTS HARE BEEN RECEIVED AND ALL REWRED MPROKMENIS HAVE LREN SCALE: AS NOTED SATISFACTORILY CWPLETEO. ,ER SYSTEM As-BUITs sum - REVISIONS REPREPARED AND S RNMNU M TILE CND RETAIN SUPERNTEDENT No. Date Ai IFE COMPEnON OF THE WATER $YSIF]V C Tiff CND DEPARMENT AN -TON. W14. RETAIL PROVIDE MAL RESPONSE DOCUMENTINGi FIII/ City SMOmJIIIan 9-13-07 E COMPLETION GTE TIIE WATER SYSTEM WORK. TESTING WA .WARY AND ONE-YEAR WARRANTNT Y PERIOD REMOE. ME IOI SHALL CWTRACREPAIR. REPLACE CR RETEST RYIMPILY AS ORECIED BY IN CND RETAI4 SUPERINIEN ARID AHO wW WORK. A ALL NOEL. ITES EDIIIPMMAY MATERIALS OR PARTS. EQUIPMENT. T. WHICH MAY FAO OtIWNG ME ONE KAR WARRANTY CIO SYewoRno 6 AL (PA" UB' FOR WIi/CR'STIR �� 1I M y A, � i0 QO SPEOICAAOtl ID1ID A•OIC �_ =_ R. NO. 7837 * WATER NOTES _ °PAL vt ALL WATER UK AND RELATED ILORK M RE PERRRNED V F ACCOR - WIN ME SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS FOR L VV\\\ IVY THE INSTALLATION O: WATER LJ LINES AND APPURTENANCES FOR ALL RATER SYSTEMS OWNED BY ME CHAMPLAIN WAIER OS BICT ME CITY ON SOUTH BU`UNGMN, CO.CHESTE R FIRE DISTRICT /1. ANO THE VILLAGE OF .ERICNO HENCEFORTH THE -CND SPEGFl MWEC AJ. JOINT IESNALL TMSTL S M TWIST OFF NUrs SHALL BE A EBM OR SOMA, EQUAL. APPROVED EWAGRIP RWC RING 8 FOR PAYED SURFACES F FOR GLASSED AREAS HE �D/\\i/\\//�/� �_Ia"_III IIII IIII IIII K • . • a � . r • Illtllil 11Rin! OF SELECT SAMFILL FREE ' '" " OVISTY _=IIII Illslilliill=flllt•. j\��p��Ojallllfil i1=1111Ej�0j�/j�\\Gj� IISTANDARD IIIII % `` `` ```� IIII-111 ,. P �SBOARD+C, .rl 1) A, _111ALL I ND O IN ' 111111E IIII_: .?•• :.• :. r• =IIII= a IIII 1t Ail • = . - I MAN Ilil •..s,�„Ay9,- :Ifll=--IIICtz1. CRUSHED STONE IIIIIIlA,, 11 I '>N EI111-314" (— . LENGTH OF EN TRENCH SHALL ICI{ I BE KEPT TO IImill II=Il''�ly r a IIII III REMOWD PITH , MAMMALRI. Is � r , ,REPLka ttlllll l.:. •- ">I N ICAL TAMPERS SHALL USED CILY OWN FLOE —IM — III=IIII =1lil=� h11=1111=1111_ililBE uTElailn=nn._EExTO'No TO ENOmr FIRM. STABLE, rj_1 TYPICAL SEWER TRENCH 314 1' 0- PAVED I IANPAWD SLOPE FRAME AND UO AREAS AREAS HEAVY DUTY FRAME A, LID TO MATCH ROAD GRADE L®ARpI LC]aB-1 OR NEENAN RIO" REFER TO ROAD SECTIONS M EQUAL WIN SELF- SEALING FOR DEPTH OF MOGRADE 4' &A. - 'WET LEBARON-SEALnTE- OR EQUAL AND ROADWAY MATERIALS m GTGFT FRAME TO TOP MANHOLE NO1E5 (. \PRECAST CONCRETE �S- RING MINsIUM 4 ,INCHES, NAXINUY 12 INCHES 1. PROKOE SMOOTH SWEEPING TRAN.MNS BETWEEN ECCENTRIC CONICAL TOP SECTON INWRTS OF INTERSECTING PIPES NO SHARP BENDS k 2. IF DEPM DF MANHOE IS R LESS THAN 7 FEET FROM BUM RUBBER SEAL RIM TO INVERT, RIEN A FLAT TOP XILL BE MSTALLID. F DEPTH IS 7 FEET OR MORE �I, CDAi ENTIRE W1SDE WITH ASPHALT SEALANT THEN A CONICAL TOP PILL r BE INSTALLED. I FORM INVERT 10 SAME �. OA I WADED WRE FABRIC (6 X 6 WW) RADIUS AS IARCEST PPE YMER_ ASM _ LEAWIMG MANHOLECOPWITH Di112 GRADE STEEL REINMFORCEMENT OR CS A. ENGINEER TO APPROVE EQUAL 12. O.C. BACKFRL AROUND STRUCTURE. i- S It USE MANHOLE STUBS FOR ALL PIPES STAINLESS SEEM CLAMP I ` BWaG AND MORTAR MWRT SLOPE TOP MANHOLE BOTTOM 2' TO SIDE UNLESS MUWCIFALITY APPROVES x'T I CAST IN MACE INVERT µ BARE. 6. O.C. MIN WAYS 1 2' aU EL ON I' STONE FOR SUB -BASE ( IM AS AENGINEER IF NET ANDND OR OR UNSTABLE " Sam CONDITIONSEMsr. A.EXIBLE Rt1BBER BOOT a uTmisnmsa sat �2 TYPICAL SE WER MANHOLE 112-_ 1. 0-WITH 24- COVER door TIHLLNLL ttw9ILTMo D,rram,s LATr AEWSWD m A EApHA N SHED BY MEANS OF A WATER TEST OR VACUUM TE51. MANY CASE. "W SHALL BE BE NO NSBLE LEAKAGE MID THE BASE OR WADS OF A COMPLETED MANHOLE B. AFIER THE MANHOLE HAS BEEN ASSEMBLED IN PLACE ALL LIFTING HIES AND THOSE EXTERIOR UOINT$ WTWN 6 FEET OF SHE GROUND SURFACE SHALL BE FILLED AND POINTED WTH AN APPROWD NON -SHRINKING MORTAR. TE TEST SHALL BE MADE PRIOR TO PLACING INE SHELF AND INVERT. F THE GROUNDWATER TABLE HAS BEEN ALLOWED TO RISE ABOVE THE BOTTOV OF THE MANHOLE. THE ENGINEER MAY DIRECT IT TO BE LOWERED FOR THE DURATION OF WTEST; ALL PIPES AND OTHER OPENINGS INTO THE MANHOLE SMALL W SUITABLY PLUGGED AND THE PLUS BRACED TO PREVENT BLOWOUT. C F THE CONTRACTOR ELECTS TD BAC ALL PRIOR TO WATER TESTMO FOR ANY REASON IT SHALL BE AT HIS OW RISK AND IT SHALL BE M tAMIENT UPON 7NE GXITRACTOR TO DETERAHWE THE REASON FOR ANY FAILURE OF THE TEST NO AOXUSTMENT IN THE LEAKAGE ALLOWANCE WILL BE MADE FOR UNNNOWN CAUSES SUCH AS LEAKAGE OF PLUGS ABSORPTION. FTC I.E.. IT WILL BE ASSUMED MAT ALL LOSS OF WATER WRING THE TEST IS A RESULTS OF LEAKS THROUGH ME MNTS OR THROUGH TINE CONCRETE, FURTHERMORE THE COIiRACTGT SHALL TAKE ANY STEPS NECESSARY TO ASSURE TE FNCNEER THAT THE WATER TABLE IS BELOW THE BOTTM OF THE MANHOLE THROUGHOUT THE LEST. a IF HE GROUNDWATER TA&E IS ABOW THE HIGHEST )000T M TIE MANHO[ AND F THSE IS W LEAKAGE INTO THE MANHOLE AS DEIERIN ED BY THE ENGINEER, SUCH A TEST CAN BE USED TO EVALUATE THE WRIER MMTFESS OF THE MANHOLE. HOWEVER, F TE ENGINEER MS NOT SATISFIED, TALE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOWER THE WATER TABLE AND CARRY OUT THE TEST AS DESCRIBED HEREINBEFORE E WAILER TEST THE MANNOIE SHAM TEN BE FILLED WTH WWlet TO TE COP OF THE DONE SECRON. A PERM OF ONE HOUR NILI. BE PERMITTED, TO ALLOW FOR ABSORPTION AT THE END OF ills PERIOD. THE MANHOLE SHALL BE REFILLED TO THE TOP OF THE CONE, IF NECESSARY, AND THE MEASURING ME OF AT LEAST 6 HOURS BE". AT TE END OF TE TEST PERIOD. THE MANHOLE SHALL BE REFIRED TO THE TOP OF ME CONE MEASURING INE VOLUME OF WATER ADDED. T6S AMOUNT $HALL BE CONWRTD TO A 24 HOUR RAZE AND INE LEAKAGE DETERMINED ON THE BASS OF DEPTH. INE LEAKAGE FOR EACH MANHOLE SMALL NOT EXCEED ONE GALLON PER WRTCA FORT FOR A 24 HOUR PERIM. REPAIRS BY APPROVED METHODS MAY BE MADE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER, TO BRIO THE LEAKAGE WRRN ALLOWABLE RATE OF ONE GALLON PER FOOT PER DAY. IT SHALL BE IRE CONTRACTOR'$ RESPOVSB6UTY ED UNCOVER THE MANHOLE AS NECESSARY, AND TO DISASSEMBLE RECONSTRUCT OR REPLACE IT AS OIIECIED BY TE ENaNEER. THE MANHOLE SHALL HEN BE RETESTED. F. VACUUM TEST THE CaNIRACRIR SHALL FURNISH TE MANHOLE GONE SEAL VACUUM PUMP. ALL NECESSARY GAUGES, HOSES, AND EQUIPMENT w PERFORLM TE EST. O FILL ALL LIFTING HOLES AHD EXTERIOR AxNTS WITH APPROVED MOH-SHRMBONC MORTAR AND PLUG ALL DINER OPENINGS INTO TE MAHOLE M PRE WTIT DISPLACEMENT. H. MSTAI AN INTAB INFLATABLE RUBBER RING TIE SITE OF THE TOP OF TE MANHOLE BY IIlATMG THE RING WM AM, TO A FWSSURE ADEQUATE TO PREVENT LEAKAGE OF AR BETWEEN TE RIG AND ME MANHOLE WALL. L PUMP TE AIR OUT OF RE MANHOLE IHRWGH AN OPENIG IN THE TEST FY.AIE UNM A VACUUM IS CREATED MSTOE I E MANHOLE EQUAL TO 10 9MHE$ OF MERCURY USING AN APPROWD VACUUM GALRE. MEN STOP HE REMOVAL OF AM AND WG I THE TEST. J. THE VACUUM CAN NOT MOP BELOW 9 INCHES OF MERCURY WEIN A 2 MINUTE TEST PERIOD. F MORE THAN A 1 INCH DROP OCCURS WRRN 2 MINUTES, ME MAWOLE HAS FAZED THE TEST, AND IT SHALL BE REPAIRED OR RECCW.SINLICIED A. TEN RETESTED U NM IT PASSES AT NO EXPENSE TO OWNER. K. BAGIFRL AROUND TIE MANHOLE UMdI MTSFACTORY TEST RESITS. �1 TESTING MANHOLES _ l 44 I a ' ,■ ' Nil �''�, ' 11 O ■ ■ I AAI FF JJ)) w. 11 II � fit■--■�■■■__ ®' 'I■ _ �. �� . •!� �l� \1� � ' i � 964i► it I l� 1 � I � �■II■■lIli/lNa�� ■ ■THE FAD ENDS OF IHE PIPE AM CONNECT IW AIR CONTROL EQUIPMENT TO � TAPPED END ■RANGE - W AIR SUIPPLY SO MAT THE PRESSURE REMAIN ABOVE 3.0 PSI FOR AT LEAST 5 MINUTES TO FROM 0 TO 5 P9 . W GAUGE SHOULD HAVE MINIMPA DIMSIONS OF at PSI AM Mso PS ®�■ ■ ■® ■■PRESSURE REACHES 3.0 PSI START THE STOP WATCH AM RECORD THE TME IF TAKES TO REA PIPE DIAMETER MNAIIES SEODNDS PIPE DIAMETER "Nums SEMMOS' ■ ■■■ ■■D. IF LATERALS ARE RKILUDED IN TtIf TESTM W AWRAGE OF THE USING DIAMETER AM ■ ■■ ■■F THERE IS GROUND WATER A&()W INE SEWR ME W AIR TEST PRESSURE IVU BE �ASEO BY ■■■■■ ■■■ ME IEST TIME IS THAT ■■IF LESS MAN REQUIRED IN THE MOW TABLE. THE PIPE WL HAM FAkED AND ADEQUATE REPAIRS AND RETESQND WU REWIRED AT NO EXPENSE_OM 1 IN!■■■■ ■■ ■■ SEC I■ .. l Ill■i��• ■� �11■■ MENO ■ Ill li ■ �!� �. EItm� ; MENU ■■NI■ Ill ■II■M `;NE� ISO,! ■■■ IS ii■�.iE��■■i®■■■■1■ 111■�I■1�E=\��■■■II�__ ( MINE ■ 1■ .T.,wWTFarWreAnli9",'7IIIItIII�-- ,: , 11�� —W��\ .. =4�■ �� ■■ ■IIM ■ 1■ l...aatt.�.■MM �� NOON■ 0\I "'al��■■■■_■_■_ �� ■ MEN ■■■■■m NOON ■ ��■■■■■�� I ■ ■ NOON■ ■ Ni , . ■ I■■■ ■ NOON■■■ ■ENE■ N■■NI■ IEEE ■■■■ III ■■■■NONE ■ EI IE�� ■ ■ ■ENEMN _•MEE iumm 1 IEEE N ■ NO■MEE W— 1■ IENNN■E IEEE■ENE■KNEW N'�i! J►, EEL■ ' : l • Technology Park Sowh Budmgtoa, VT Lot 2 OWNER: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)860-1691 Fax: (802)860-1695 DESIGN BUILDER: ReArch Company 30 Community Drive Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 06403 Phone:(802)863.8727 Fax: (802)863-8734 ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne, VT 05482 Phone:(802)985-5595 Fax: (802)9855565 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC 125 Main Street Reading, MA 01867 Phone:(781)670-9990 Fax: (781)870-9939 CIVIL ENGINEER: Trudell Consulting Engineers 478 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)879-6331 Fax: (802)879-0060 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: BE Group 131 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Phone:(802)862-0096 Fax: (802)865-2440 MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box 525 43 Krupp Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)8643800 Fax: (802)864-3904 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Omega Electric 25 Omega Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)862-0517 Fax: (802)862.4349 FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protection P.O. Box 2004 Colchester, VT 05446 Phone:(802)878.6594 Fax: (802)878-2186 DATE: 09/07/2007 SCALE: AS NOTED REVISIONS No. Date 1 jFkOI City Submissbn 9-13-07 m REFER ro 91E MAN FOR RIM ELEVATION W ILET C� REFER EDST.4' . ' 4 FLANGE WLET FRAME AND E%ISRM BOTiDM J { OF DETENTION •�. ' '` GRATE, CAST W MALL. LEBARON LAG244 OR EQU& BASIN. EL .qcn I4'li4' ";�'� `•„�—NEIDED MME FABRIC �I. Md2TAR wTLET ORIFICES ;I.'. REFER To SITE PLAN FOR Si2E AND ELFVATNX! �"tl :. 15' RCP PIPE 4 ; I,. 4' LIP OPTIONAL N0.4 BARS, 6' D.C. BOTH WAYS 'qi$ 1'•� 8• DRAWL FOR SUB -BASE 1 OR AS REQUIRED BY ENGINEER IF BET OR UNSTARLE OONOIXIV5 EXIST �_—uws1URBE0 Sot %11 EXTENDED DETENTION SHALLOW �•_,•_D- WETLAND OUTLET STRUCTURE DETAIL �1 MBnL WNaL,N� Q+QHEEA. CAS, REM;O �Nn3ro> _ _ HEAVY DUTY 3 FLANGE WLET FRAME AND CRATE. N&RVAH R-34M OR LEBARW LF248-2 RNERE IN r IS -1 LOCATED NEXT ED A CURB. USE A FIANCE FRAME 4' — —1 FRAME TO 4 INCHES FROM TOP CONCRETE AO.VSTYENT RING PRO 24' HEIGHT AS NEEDED ' OM. LNG RUBBFH BOOT (PRESS STEEL PSX) 36' DMMETER A• WIYWUM DIAMETER PIPE 1aiB' RCP,CF,CAAP.PEP ' PLC — 5W' MELDED WRE FABRIC OR AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN STRUCTURAL WTEGBTY ,..-.-0 BARS, 12' DC BOTH WAYS �C REQUIRED m1EGRTYNNrAW w;.3 _-8' GRAVEL FOR SUB -BASE OR AS REQUIRED BY ENoNEER F W GR UNSTABLE CONDITIONS EXIST UNMSNRBED SOL �1 TYPE B' CATCH BASIN BB4 MIN L cW _R D+OHFERS WT RE\® w POLYEMttENE FLARED END SECTION. ADS OR EQUAL. 'o PLAN VIEW CONDITDITI ON CONDITION EM`VM WTEBOR ',Sm, AlEO EXIEB4R. HMiI DEFl9TY AD4Z YLENE PIPE DLDPE). a-IZ OR DRALA SYSTEMS (ADS) FINISHED GRADE N-12 OR EQJAI. WHERE NOTED W PLRIPRAP SI S OF TAPERED PRONDE fY nPE 1 R PRA SIDES O' END SECTKW OVER 12' TYPE P21N RBRAP -SLOPE AS PER SITE MAN SLOPE AS PER SITE PLAN b" AFT —.. POLT *DIVE MRED END SELDOM• OUTLET CONvirrm ADS oR EWAL. CONDITION 4 ELEVATION VRW •..;"`'"' �V1 POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) END SECTION ,.I! R0.0B1 OMgL{IM LN�PS 14/.roM LK-GTAI OUTLET CONTROL fY ORIFICE _ SCREEN CENTERED ON _ 21" RCP EXISTING CONCRETE ----- ___ FLARED END SECTION ro eE REMORED • � EXISTNG 2f' RCP OUTLET CONTROL SCREEN TO BE ATTACHED TO FRONT I , L------------------------ OF OUTLET STRUCTURE I� BOT907 _mil 7OM OF BANK am EXISTING CONCRETE FLARED END SECTION i"P ORIFICE OVERFLOW ELEV. 3330' TO BE REMOVED EXISTING 21' RCP EXTEND T TOP OF OUTLET BANK 1' W OUTLET CONTROL B" STRUCTURE 1' . � SCREEN I~ J3SS0 I , 1 EXISTING 29" RCP e i ° ELEV. 327.5' - INN. 330.58 1'0 ORIFICE ELEV. 3305E I I ----------------- ------------------------------ ' A .NO NEW I _-I I� fe• SECTION POND 3 OUTLET DETAIL (LOT I WETLAND) SGLL I-s4• PNTN�. NEAW wTY S i1,1NGE WLEI FRAME B CRATE. 4'---'---'---- NEENAN R-S40.5B OR LEBAROI4 LF24B-2 M4M WLETIS NOT LOCATED NEXT TO OURS USE A 4 nANDE FRAME TOP ,i F M=a CONCRETE A—STMENT RING HEIGHT AS NEEDED +J1 ---'---" RDER 14GS O 12'O.C. + ['. DIAM�EI�SEE TABLE WUELDD/ " ASDRE(RXdREBt�TO I6-M OiER STRUCURAI INTEGRITY _--RUBBER BOOT (PRESS SEAL ON COCK Jdrop } ]7' r `? 14 BAR$ 12• D.C., BOTH WAYS ssIIRUACILRRAL.15GRIRITD TO Y TAW 12' GRA4 FOR SUB -BASE A ..._,� L _ M1 y 'i --y OR AS REWIRED BY ENGINEER IF AND OR UNSTABLE Y�] M b° . DIT cONanOVs EMsr. UNDI5/1IRSED SOIL �31 TYPE D' CATCH BASIN /2•-" 1a2 ,XurLL GoxaA1NA: FTAawFRs uM¢D .T/reroo NOTE CONTACT ENGINEER WHEN 4' DOVETR CANNOT BE MAWTAWED —iRIA$HED GRADE 2F tno eL e O V ep 6 LIR m //\�//// APPROVED SAC, x �pTYz F (STANDARD ) BEOOIIIG I I-_ �� _ I $iOlw DRAW lWE IK a o I314' —III ... .: I _ _ ` �e '• -II"_ —III I I —I HARD STOVE TO SINRWGIINE Gf PA'E NOTE: sroNE REauuecG F P� IS GF A PYC MA ERIAL ' � 1-III-111 III III -I I I �1 TYPICAL STORM DRAM TRENCH UNDISTURBED SOL 3/4' - I'-D• �-4" PER. SDR 33 P. FABRIC BRVIIND W FOOTING DRAIN CLEANOUT f0OPw ORMN I'_ r D' ION iRUOf1L GIXIEULII+G fFI5TaF16 - -- TYPE INSIDE OANEIER M L M IA IE Al. ' n iB TW D4 os 4FY Bo' .TD 2{ B 3 DB OB %• BO' NOTE: UNOERORAW N1L1 BE INDICATED BY THE OTT M PRO,EC/ ENGINEER AS THEY DEEM APPROBATE, 3, TOPsat SEED AND MULCH LaARW LX530 I 8. 12' FLUSRNNG BASIN COVER I•R -\ GRIN LINE 4 I T REVEAL 4' PLC CAP t J' - .. ,Q - 6'F24' QW CAR'" BASIN ,z_w ' �, E —4' PVC SDR 35 7777 wRe CLA55 e CONCRETE 61. o &. aeebbb ¢e SRIRBED TRENCH O 0 Q Qp WALL BANK RUN GRAVEL VARI I SET: PLAN Q WASHED HARD STONE AS' BEIN O4 END OF UNUENORNN CURB LURE UNDERDRAIN 2a, BASIN �'� I I I DERDRMN 2 + I f I NRAP STONE W WRAP GEOSYNTIRTIC FABRIC MIRAFl I 4• PERFORATED PVC eaox U FABRIC 12' SLOPED ro DRAW APµ �, SCALE 1. 1'-0' s-allor PLAN) SCALE 1/2•�I'-0' s-HOPS N) SLOPE Q UNDERDRAIN WITH FLUSHING BASIN vSKRHIDNQ�ER, o„7Y,aT _ ow I, l'F cFo c SFp "FO ° fso 8©�% e�n�9fo^ ♦� MANHo.E NOTES 1. IF DEPTH OF MANHOLE IS- `��W 7 FEET OR LESS FROM 24' OPENING •ORAIH ro CENiE TOP ILL BE THEN INSIATHEN A FG I TOP WILL BE F DEPTH IS r '.�. DUTY FRAME G LID LABELED NEENAH R-iBIB OA LEBAR4N LC %B -- GROUT FRAME TO 4 INCHES FROM TOP MOVE THAN 7 FEET, THEN MORE THAN TOP RILL BE g {' PRECAST T4 T RING W51AtlEDµ 1e , I SECTION MINIMUM INCHE$nYAXWUY 12 ECCENTRIC CONICAL TOP SECTION COPOL"WER POYPROPOENE LADDER RUNGS 12' O.C. y 46' DIA. BU1tt ,XXWT SEALANT 10B N1Dm NINE FABRIC (6 X 8 WW) 7 •' 3• - — RUBBER BOOT (PRESS SEAL PSX) MNA7YI�M WPF �ei1F 30 PVC + 24' RCP.CSP,GAP.CPEP STORM DRAW LBR: y 4-F � � ,,,,.,-F„"A •' j„�X.I — /4 BARS, Iz• G.c.. BOTH WAYS y� 5 ,2' GR.AVII w 1• STONE FOR U O _- SUB -BASE OR AS REQUIRED BY ENGINEER F NET AND OR UNSTABLE CONDITIONS EXIST. -- UNDISTURBED SQL TYPICAL STORMWATER MANHOLE 2W] IRLOOl G645ULTtt.G ENGIkIX.S AEMYD OJ/IMN7 FE Technology Park South BTulingtorL, VT Lot 2 OWNER: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)860-1691 Fax: (802)860.1695 DESIGN BUILDER: ReAroh Company 30 Community Drive Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)863-8727 Fax: (802)863-8734 ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelbume, VT 05482 Phone:(802)9855595 Fax: (802)985S565 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC 125 Main Street Reading, MA 01867 Phone:(781)670-9990 Fax: (781)670-9939 CIVIL ENGINEER: Trudell Consulting Engineers 478 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)879.6331 Fax: (802)879-0060 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: BE Group 131 Church Street BurtirTgton, VT05401 Phone:(802)862.0096 Fax: (802)865-2440 MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box 525 as Kmpp Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phona:(802)864-3800 Fax: (602)864-3904 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Omega Electric 25 Omega Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)862-0517 Fax: (802)862-4349 FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protection P.O. Box 2004 Colchester, VT 05446 Phone:(802878.6594 Fax: (802)878-2186 DATE: 09/07/2007 SCALE: AS NOTED REVISIONS No. Date FNm CRY SLbmIBNan 9-I3-07 _ * TB3T D3 BITUMINOUS PANEMENI 10 OURSE TYPE IV COURSE TYPE 11 D4 CQVCFETE CURB 6" 7' REVEAL ^ 1,llli g ° f—III III=1 I1= 11=1I 1 = I. MIRAn 30OX FILTER FABRIG BANK RUN GRAVEL -- CRUSHER RUN GRAVEL r1-'\ PAVEMENT AND CURB DETAIL ',°RU9'cT� �N.zut„«c L.PyEFAs I--12'—'I - _..._._._.r RO-T I2'r18' — -- 1e' PARIO4G OPLY 1. RB-10 1T•AB' -- - T1 VESBE IB !•-0• AC (VAN SPA( ONLY) 1 . 'BREAK -AWAY STAE - SIG N POST (STEEL) , FINISH GRADE —� _i 3'-0' MIN. CONCRETE SETTING (OPnoNAL) r I HANDICAP PARKING SiGN 2ror L-s9oas � 1 i HANDICAP ACCESS RAMP NOTES 1. BASE COURSE TO BE PLACED FIRST YEAR. FINISH COURSE TO BE PLACED SECOND YEAR. 2. ALL ROAD MATERIAL TO BE APPROVED BY INE PRO.ECT ENGINEER AND CITY ENGINEER PRIOR r0 INSTALLATION. FINISH TYPE IY 3. ALL UTILITY WAlERIALS (STRUCTURES AND PIPES) BASE TYPE TD BE APPROVED BY CT 26. CITY M NS ENONEER AND R. CRUSHER RUN GRAVEL -- GRAVEL _-_� 13• MIRAn 500X FILTER FABRIC OR 6' SAND CUSHION COVCREIE CURB MIN. ID COIPACICRA VELEL BENEAM s' 9DEWAIz lx 4' TOPsat 5' LiA55 B CONCRETE W, - 5' MIN. CLASScoNCR GFA VEL I 4' UNOERORAIN PERFORATED PW SOR 34 1' WASHW U STCWE BALXFIL, WIRAPPW N FILTER FABRIC (WRAP 140X) BE LNIOEFORAN SYSTEV, INTO CATCH BASIIs (LNOERORAN INSTALLED AS RATICAIED BY MINEER) SANITARY SEWER —"" D (5' AIN. COVER RCP OF PIPE) UNOERQRMN j 1a r/2' WATER MAN, 6' CORER %2"\ CAMPUS DRIVE CROSS SECTION vaRxs RFsm r0 s E RAn N rs (PRIVATE ROAD) 00000000000000 00000000000000000 0oo0oo0oo0oo00000 00000000000o000000 CAST IRON DETECTARLE WARNING PLATES WM RMSED nRUNCATW DOMES SET FLUSH N CONCRETE ttR AS MANUFACTURED BY NEENAH FOUNDRY Ca, EAST JORDAN IRON M)RKSA OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT DETECTABLE WARNING TEXTURE SPECIFICATIONS 1/2• EXPANSION/CONTRACTION JOINT MM ASPHALT IMPREGNAtEO FIBER BOARD FILLER EVERY SO FEET. SCORED OR TOaED JOINT (I. OEPM OR 1/3 ME TOTAL OEPM OF WALK) WM A SEPARATION DISTANCE EQUAL TO THE — OF THE SIOEWALX. FULL -BREAK OR CONPLETE JOINT EVERY 20 FEET. NOTE' aSTANCES ARE TYPICAL AND MAY BE ALTERED FOR SPECIFIC SITE CONWRONS. b" 3' 3' 1MCl( CONCRETE WEAR COURSE (4000 PsT) MINIMUM 6• GRAVEL BASE %8"\ TYPICAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK 1/2' = 1'-0• COLORS LEGEND - WIRE (REFIECBYE) BACKGROUND - RED (REFMcnVE) EN CAPSULATED LENS SCAN DIMENSIONS (W NCHES) A B C D E I F BIKE 10 3A 6 W 3 7311 MIIMUM 24 S B BC 4 10 STANDARD JO J 4 10 1-5 12 112 EYPRESSWAY 36 T 12 IX 6 IS SPECAL 46 11 f/-I 1B I foci B 1 a0 CDu B1 THE REGULATORY SGNRE SBACKGROUND. MIS DETAIL SHALL HAVE WHITE TEXT M ON RES ADO R12ED RED EMAME COLORS SHALL CONFORM WIN M TIRE TCOLRA ADOPTED BY ME AMEPoCAN ROVED BY DF STATE HNNWAY AND FEDERAL HIGHWAY A ADMINI S AND APPROVED BY ME DEPT G" MANSPORtAl10N, FEDERAL HIGHWAY AONINISMAnoN. tNE SIGN BAST MATERIALS USED FOR THE REGULATORY SIGN SHORN ON MIS DETAIL MAY BE ANY OF ME FOLLOWNG OF THE MINIMUM MICKNESS N01ED. 2r p 21• A 24' 24' x M' Jb' p JO' J6' A 24' 12' A 12' JO' A 16' J6• A M' M' O tr A to, 30• + JO' M" A aB' FLAT SHEET AW—UM am, am' 00 OI' 0.125• .. —1 .—A. PLYMMD 1/2• 1/2' 3/9• SW' CALVANI2W FLAT SIIfEr STEEL ,6 — 10 — 14.. 12 GE THE REFLECTIVE MATERIAL FDA GROUND MMNW STCRS SHALL BE FLAT TOP WHITE REFLECTIVE SHEETING APPLIED TO ME ENTIRE BACI(GROIND OF ME SxN. ME TEXT OF 111E SONS MAY BE LETIERNG FILM, SIX SCREENED. OR NAND PAINTED. IMIEN HAND PAINTED. POOR WORKAIANSNIP SHALL SE CAUSE FOR REJECTION. REGULAMY SIGNS SHALL MEET 111E VERMONT STANDARD SPECIFICA—S FQP •TRAFFIC SIGNS•. LETTERS. OIC'm ARROWS, SPACING, AND TEXT DIMENSIONS SNALL CONFORM WM ME STANDARD ALPHABETS AM DESIGNS PRESCRIBED N TFIE MANUAL ON UNIFORM M—C CONTROL DEICES. SOURCE: VERNONT A.O.T. STANDARD E-IN 1'3-'x—"STOP- SIGN EDGE OF RRGIr-DF-Wur CONCINDE SEW AND $11011" MULGN I r r I r, / y,lyP r I, r, ih i II �I �i T rid r �r1l �i 3�y I�l Irrrli�} I, '' , D 5' x 7' CURB HANDICAP RAMP EXPANSION JOINT BETKwMM SIOEWAIX I/2' MAX. REVEAL AND tI1RBNG AIM OF DROP CURB DI TRUNCATED OSe j PA —ENT DETECTABLE TEXTURE ((J'-0' DEEP X WiDM O- SIDEWALK) r6 TYPICAL DROPPED CURB r.3• 10 Da a1TABNaIS PAVEMENT (1 EXPARSIDR .qNE MATERIAL 1-1/2- FINISH COURSE TYPE III 2" BASE COURSE TYPE II 3' CONCRETE SIDEWALK - I B' r REVEAL O O 0 1 O CONCRETE CURB 6' CRUSHER RUN GRAVEL OR RANT wx 12' GRAVEL FOR SUB -BASE Ad"n SOOX ROAD STABILIZATION FAMC 9 PAVEMENT, CONCRETE CURB, d SIDEWALK _ ,• 9 �mp7 L roxsATnG LNaxEERs �Y Of So. evriill A—WEAMNG LaIRSE (TYPE III) (VAOT 106) B , • —BASE Cq/RSE "E ICI (VAOT 106) .�—tlNSHED GRAVEL (VAOT 704.05) Y,SiL$L7 vK1T4t6 -GRAVEL BASE (RAVE BASE D ^�^ `-8 "'�ii `$ �' `-6'' MIRAn 50K STABILIZATION W ,t FABRIC INSTALLATION IN ACCORDANCE WM MAHUFACNRER'S RECOMMENDATION$ B' SANG BORROW AND WSHION TO BE USD N Poomr DRARHW sous -(V OVE'MITRE il =11111=1T1L1111_R BEEoDROCK SU.— a OR COMPACTED FILL 1WC(NESS INCHES) B E MDss __ I. SUB9AS{ SAND CUSHION AND SUSGRADE SNOUW BE CONSTRUCIEO AND COMPACIED M ME DIMENSIONS SHOWN N ACCORDANCE WM VERMONT AGENCY OF IRANSPOPTAIxN SPECIIGITIRJNS STANDARD A-76. IWNERE MORE StRNGENT LOCAL ORDINANCES HAVE BEEN ADOPh1T RELA V TO ROAD DIMENSIONS AND CONSTRUCTION, MEY SHOULD GOVERN. 2 COMPACT ALL SUBBASE MAraIALS TO 96K MApMUM CENSTY (STANDARD PROCM. 3, IF GROUNDWATER OR SOFT SPOTS ARE ENCOUNTERED CONTACT ME MINEER TO DISCUSS ADDED MEASURES a AS UNOERORAN. 10 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT Twrr IaMMn 9z . - �00000 Technology Park South Burlington, VT Lot G OWNER: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)860-1691 Fax: (802)860-1695 DESIGN BUILDER: ReArch Company 30 Community Drive Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)863-8727 Fax: (802)863-8734 ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne, VT 05482 Phone:(802)985-5595 Fax: (802)985.5565 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC 126 Main Street Reading, MA 01867 Phone:(781)670-9990 Fax: (781)670-9939 CIVIL ENGINEER: Trudell Consulting Engineers 478 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)879-6331 Fax: (802)879-0060 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SE Group 131 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Phone:(802)862-0096 Fax: (802)865-2440 MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box 525 43 Krupp Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)864-3800 Fax: (802)8643904 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Omega Electric 25 Omega Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)862-0517 Fax: (802)862-4349 FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protection P.O. Box 2004 Colchester, VT 05446 Phone:(802)878-6594 Fax: (802)878-2186 DATE: 09/07/2007 SCALE: AS NOTED REVISIONS NiDote t 1 FIOW City SUDmIsbiOD 9-13-07 ""c OF VET"Fi�i :ypp� y, wlP� H 'V 7537 PLANTING SCHEDULE ABBIPLNA'/KM/ OO7ANK.AL NAME CO/1nNON NAME QWMRY _A'ACtrK_e__ 366g AC ACORUS CALAMUS R SNEET FLAG 135 2' O.C. 1 Or POT OC AA ARONIA ARROPI MA RED CNWECHERRY 6 6' Oa 2'- 3' CA CLETHRA AWIFOUA SUMMERSWEET CLFIHRA 6 6' O.0 2' - 3' OC DESGHAMP$!A CAESPITOSA T1*-lE0 HAIRGRASS 520 PC EM EUPATORAOEIPHUS MAWLATUS JOE PYE REED 425 1.5' O.C. 1 Oi. POT IRV IV IRIS VER.MOR SLUE MG IRIS 500 BARE ROOT PV PELTANORA VRMNICA ARROW ARUM 740 1' O.a BARE ROOT PC PONTEDEMA OOROATA PICRERt1WEE0 33O 2' ac. I OT POT 11 CA SG SAGITTARIA IQE MO GRASSUNE DUCIf POTA0 f' QG BAROOT RE SC SAMRUWS CANADENSIS AMERICAN ELDERBERRY 7 6' aG 2' - 3' SV SCIRPUS VAUDUS SOFT STEM SOL— iW 1 or. POT y . P A AA � •- �� tit - _ 1 EM - 50 POCKET WETLAND PLANTAIG PLAN - LOT2 u 1Rwel ccwvATWc enaNEFFs LAST Acwsc6 m a > F 6 PLANTING SCHEDULE M!"wN BOTAWA& NAME CCNIMON Mae EPACM AR AC ACORUS C MUS SWEET FLAG 135 2' O.C. I QT. POT VC AA ARONIA ARBUTIFOUA RED WOKEONEW, 6 6' 0.C. 2' - 3' CA MMRA ALNIFQUA SUMMERSNEET CL —A 6 6' GG 2' - S DC OESCNAMPSIA CAESPITOSA RIFTED HAIRGRASS wo PC EM EUPATORADELPHVS MAWLAIUS .TOE PYE NEED 425 1.5' MC. 1 QT. POT PV IV IRIS wRSICOLOR BLUE MC IRIS 500 RARE ROOT PV PELTANORA VIRCINICA ARROW ARUM 740 1' O.C. BARE ROOT PC PONTEOERIA COROATA PICNEREI.— 3SO 2' O.0 1 01. POT I, CA SC SAGIITARIA CRAMINAE GRASSl1KE WCK POTAlOE >60 i' aG BARE ROOT Sc SAMBUCUS CANADENSIS AMERICAN ELDERBERRY 7 6' O.a 1 3' SV SCIRPUS vAMUS SOFT STEM BULRUSH 1. 1 QT. POT EM � 2 POCKET WETLAND PLAW NG PLAN - LOT3 11T IT— us/u/m REc`11�7 S / v�® Cs FP 18 2007 Of SO BIIIl% nWon Technology Park South Burlington, VT Lot 2 OWNER: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)860-1691 Fax: (802)860.1695 DESIGN BUILDER: ReArch Company 30 Community Drive Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)863-8727 Fax: (802)863.8734 ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne, VT 06482 Phone:(802)985.5595 Fax: (802)985-6-%5 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC 125 Main Street Reading, MA 01867 Phone:(781)670-9990 Fax: (781)670.9939 CIVIL ENGINEER: Trudell Consulting Engineers 478 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)879-6331 Fax: (802)879-M LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SE Group 131 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Phone:(802)862-0096 Fax: (802)865-2440 MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box 525 43 Krupp Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)864-3800 Fax: (802)864-3904 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Omega Electric 25 Omega Drive Williston; VT 05495 Phone:(802)862-0517 Fax: (802)862-4349 FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protection P.O. Box 2004 Colchester, VT 05446 Phone:(802)878.6594 Fax: (802)878-2186 DATE: 09/07/2007 SCALE: AS NOTED REVISIONS No. Date 1 Mal CItV SLDmf Wm 9-13-07 m YJ2 to 1/2 IN. x 2B W. WOLEN MI%�W.�CRUS S M FELL 112 - 2/3 FULL THY INLET ORATE SURROUND INLET WM IWO COURSES OF BAGS (UNIMUN) ME 12-INCH HEIGHT REOUREMENT IS WAVEO ; WHERE IT WLL CAUSE ROOD DMAAGE IF ME M ARE OVERTOPPED INTERWEAVE BAG ENDS TO CLOSE DAPS - BETWEEN BAGS AND TO SEAL SAGS 12 IN. MINIMUM 1 STONE BAG INLET PROTECTION SPACING VARIES DEPENDING ON _.,,.I I' CHANNEL SLOPE I 1. STONE WILL BE PLACED ON A FILTER FABRIC FOUNDATION TO IRE S. GRADES AND LOCATIONS SHOWN IN ME A PLAN. Z SET SPA OF CHECK DAMS TO ELEVATION ASSUME MAT ME ELEVATIONS O THE CREST ME DOLINSREEEAI DAM IS AT _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _.- CREST ME SAME ELEVATION 6 TIC TOE OF ME \ UPSTREAM 0". 1.5 TEE ^-\\ \\/\// UREND ME STONE A MINIMUM OF T FEET ND ?H FWN PREVENT THE P�SSNJLE A\ I PINE LOWEST MEC EC,,AH DAM FROM SCOUR 8 AND EROSION WITH STONE OR UNER AS APPROPRIATE. MAT CHANNEL R^ MIN. _—RE URTENANCES SUCH AS ENMANCES �I.OWW OHEW DAMS ARE NOT SUBJECT M DAMAGE OR RLOCKAOE FROM S. DISPLACED SIDNE. L "yp!7 6. TD BE PLACED IN DITCHES OVER i!F RIP RAP 5 NOT INSTALLED M. FILTER FABRIC {. T (;y) �` 2^-15' GRADED STONE r't`(": Z% HOUR S AFTER — IS CLEANED OR I _ U AS ORDERED BY ENGINEER 8 1 SECTION A -A 21^ MAX o cEN ER MAXIMUM DRAINAGE AREA 2 OGRES 1 � I CHECK DAM WICH SLOPE SPACING - FEET 3 70CppIY.@-e 4 50 5 40 6 3S 30 e 2s STONEC CK DAM OEM —P"N e -MINIMUM B' �2p CRUSTED STOVE EXISTING GRADE 15' ST-wAnW FABRIC — DIN raP a: suscRADE SEC710N CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS FOR STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1, STONE SZE SHALL BE NOMINAL 1-1/2 INCHES 2, LENGTH SHALL SE NOT LESS THAN W FEET S TH OOWSIS SHALL NOT BE LESS MAN B INCHES 4. FILTER FABRIC (WWI 600% OR EQUAL) SHALL BE PLACED OVER ENTIRE AREA PROR TO PLACEMENT OF STONE. 5. WDM SHALL BE NOT LESS MAN FULL WOM OF ALL POINTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS 6. WHEN NECESSARY, TRUCK WHEELS SHALL BE WASHED OR CLEANED M REMOVE SEDIMENT PRCR TO ENTRANCE ONTO PUBLIC RIGHT-OFWAY. WHEN WASUNG IS REWIRED IT SHALL FEE DONE IN ON AN AREA STABILIZED WM CRUSHED STONE WACFI DRAINS INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAP OR SEDIMENT BASIN ALL SEDIMENT SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM ENTERING ANY STORM DRAIN, DITCH OR WATERCOURSE MRWGH USE OF APPROVED ERO.STON CONTROL METHOD. 7. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WLL PREVENT TRACJONG LR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO A PUBLIC RIGHT-CY-WAY, MIS MAY REOUME PERIODIC RR DRESSING WM ADDIDONK STONE AS CCNEXRONS DENAND. AB WELL AS MAINTENANCE OF ALL SITE SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES ALL SEDIMENT DEPOSITED ONTO PUBIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL E REMOVED IMMEDIATELY 6 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO LIMIT THE ExiENT O aSMRBEO SOlS Br CONOT WAEAR'M SOFasi11FBING "ATEACDwnES LEDETAIED BUFIT:RSTO ME lA�SuRRWNDIND THEMFROM!UNNECESSARY DISTURBANCE AND COA nM WMU MACTIa APRXII WHERE THE BORDER OF AUTHORIZED DISTURBANCE BORDERS AREAS OF EXISTING VEGETATION OR WMIN VDU FEET OF WATERS OF ME STATE. UNITSTIIRBAHCE D.DD"S> sNaxD BE ME FIRST cdasmucllae rTEM µAREAS OSNNEEGETAnOVaWDEMARCATED WITH BARRIER APPROPRIATE TO 1NE LOCATION. f1pf6lBl%LB I I! fOR UE WHERE PROPOSED 011= ONCE BORDERS ESTABLISHED ED AREAS WHERE INAOVERIENT aSRLRBTH F- O MACUNERY IS NOT POSSIBLE. MAPoc TREES ALOUD LIILIT OF GEARING WITH RAGGING RIBBON OR PAINT CORRESPONDING i0 THE CLEAAINO LIMITS ON EPSC PLAN: SPACING BETWEEN RIBBON OR PAINT MARKINGS SHALL BE NO MORE MAY 50 FEET. FOR USE WHERE PROPOSED DISTURBANCE BORDERS NplAIED AEAS MORE MAN IQD FEET fRW THE NEAREST WATER RESOURCE (STREAM. BROOK. LAKE. PAHD. tAERANO. ETC.). BARRIER TAPE SHALL BE HIGH WSSA." SHOBE ATTAC ED SSSTTAPEMfESWITH A MINE" H�aalT OF 4TH 3 1NCHES. RAPARR FEET FROM ME TAPE ULD GROUND. TKPI FENCE/SFIOW FENCE/BOLIIEK FOR USE WHERE ME PROPOSED DSTURBANCE IS WHIN 100 FEET OF A WATER RESOURCE (STREAM. BROA(, LIKE. POND, w"ND, ETC.). UNLESS AREA IS DENSELY WOODED. FENCE SHOUD BE RAUDUS BE S'ANCEDPREVENT ACCESS To A - By CLOSELY TD PREVENT LNERY ACCES£ Y. Bd11DERS SHALL y PROJECT DEMARCATiONITREE PROTECTION FCw gLTFCED�ML HOTS: INSTALL SILT FENCE ALONG CONTOUR ON COMPLETES SNCL OF STOCKPILE. SnES, 'SILT FENMST STOCKPILE ON FLAT SITES ATE FENCE E OVEDREMAMA IN PLACE UNTIL MATERIAL IS REMOVED AND AREA IS srAauzm. 4 TEMPORARY TOPSOIL STOCKPILE EROSION PROLE T -- (MIRTH ENwROPENCE, OR APPROVED 3)SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSPECTED WEKLY, AND AFTER EACH SONMCANT PRECIPITATION EVENT. EQUAL MAY E SUBSTITUTED.) MAINTENANCE STALL E PERFORMED AS NEOED. AND SEDMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN 'BULGES' -.--.-. FILTER FABRIC. OR WOVEN DEVELOP IN ME SILT FENCE. WINE FABRIC --------iY00DEN AP METAL STAKE 4)BROKEN STAKES SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY. (MAX. 10- OC.) KEY FABRIC INTO GROUND (MALL 6") FLOW co,LED- P FFN ])FENCE POST SHALL BE DRIVEN, 10 FEET MAXIMUM ON CENTER; POSTS SHALL BE DRIVEN MINIMUM24" BELOW -- - GRADE FENCE SHALL BE POSITIONED AS SHOWN. PARALLEL To IME GROUND CWTWRS 2)iRENCH SHALL BE EXCAVATED MINIMUM B INCHES _ DEEP ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF FENCE LINE 3)WOVEN WIRE FABRIC (14 GA.. 6 INCH MAX MESH CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS OPENING) SHALL E STAPLED OR FASTENED SECURELY FOR SILT FENCE WITH WINE TIES TO UPSTREAM SIDE OF FENCE POSTB. WOMEN WIRE FABRC SHALL EXTEND MINIMUM 36 SLi FENCE STALL E flMER PE -FABRICATED EROSION CONTROL FENCE (MIRAFI ENNROENCE INCHES ABOVE GRADE. DR EWAL,4 MCOVSTRUCl/D-IN-P[ACE AS SPECIxD HEREIN. 4)FlL11F FABRIC SHALL BEFASTENED SECURELY ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF WOVEN WIRE FABRIC RIM WIRE PITS-F ARIC TIED SILT FENCE nEA SPACED EVERY 24 INCHES AT TOP AND MID- SECTION OF FENCE MINIMUM B INCH FLAP OF FILTER I)MM SHALL BE INSTALLED PARALLEL TO GROUND FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED IN TRENCH W UPSTREAM CONTOURS AND FRIER FABRIC SIDE SHALL FACE UPSTREAM; MESH AND STAKES SHALL FACE SIDE OF FENCE AND BACKFILLED. DOWNSTREAM. 2)MV CH SHALL E EXCAVATED MINIMUM 6 INCHES 5)WHEN TWO SECRONS OF FABRIC AD OM EACH DMER. THEY SHALL BE OVERLAPPED BY 6 INCHES, FOLDED DEEP W UPSTREAM SIDE OF FFNOE TINE EXCESS FLAP OF FILIER FABRC (MIFIIMUM B INCHES) AND STAPLED. SHALL BE PLACED IN TRENCH. TRENCH SHALL BE 6)SILT FENCE SHALL BE INSPECTED WEEKLY. AND AFTER 6ACKFILLEU AND COMPACTED. CONSTRUCTION IN THIS MANNER PREVENTS SEDIMENT -LADEN RUNOFF EACH CIDVFCANT FREOPItATION EVENT. MAINTENANCE SNALL E PERFORMED AS NEEDED, FROA FLOWING UNDER SILT FENCE. IN AND REMOVED WHEN 'BULGES' DEVELOPSILT FENCE. 7 SiLT FENCE 3-INCH WADE BRIGHT ORANGE POLYPROPYLENE OR FIBERGLASS TAPE 1.5-INCH SOUARE HARDWOOD POST NOTE: EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO GROUND FREEZING TO ENSURE PROPER INSTALLATION. IF GROUND FREEZES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, THEN OTHER METHODS OF STABILIZATION MAY HAVE TO BE EMPLOYED (CONTACT ENGINEER). ON SEEP SLOPES. APPLY STRIPS OF NETTING PARALLEL TO ME DIRECTCTI OF ROW AND ANCHOR PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECJFICATIONS. (SLOPES (BEATER MAN I; I) STEEL T-POST OR t 3/4-INCH SOU ARE HARONOOD POST 4-100T BRIGHT ORANGE BARRIER/SNOW FENCE IN CHANNELS, APPLY NETTING SHALLOW LAY FROM BOTTOM UP W/ 4" 01 PARALLEL TD THE DIRECTION SLOPE KEY IN AT TOP OF SLOPE/BERM. OF ROW ON SHALLOW SLOPES, STRIPS OF NEMNO MAY BE APPLIED ACROSS ME SLOPE (SLOPES UP TO 1:1) BRING NETTING TO A LEVEL AREA BEFORE 'TERMINATING INSTALLATION. BERM ANCHOR AS SHOWN. WIFE THERE IS A BERM AT THE TOP OF NC SLOPE, BRING ME SETTING OVER ME BERM AND ANCHOR IT 6. BEMNO THE BERM. 0% USE ERASION CONTRA, BLANKET SPECIFIED ON ME EROSION CONTROL PLAN OR EQUAL. S EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (SLOPES & CHANNELS) Setoc' S�Eo Cityo f �8 240% So e�ryin9t0 n LB .^........--. ---- ...-.-- EQUAL g EMERGENCY SPILLWAY Technology Park South Burlington, VT LOT 2 OWNER: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(602)860-1691 Fax: (802)860-1695 DESIGN BUILDER: ReArch Company 30 Community Drive Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)663-8727 Fax: (802)663-8734 ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne, VT 05482 Phone:(802)985-5595 Fax: (802)985-5565 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC 125 Main Street Reading, MA 01867 Phone:(781)670-9990 Fax: (781)670-9939 CIVIL ENGINEER: Trudell Consulting Engineers 478 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)879-6331 Fax: (802)879-0060 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SE Group 131 Church Street Burlington, VT05401 Phone:(802)862-0098 Fax: (802)865-2440 MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box 525 43 Krupp Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)664-3800 Fax: (802)864-3904 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Omega Electric 25 Omega Drive Williston, VT 05496 Phone:(802)862-0517 Fax: (802)862-4349 FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protection P.O. Box 2004 Colchester, VT 05446 Phone:(802)878.6594 Fax: (802)878.2186 DATE: 09/07/2007T� SCALE: AS NOTED REVISIONS No. Date T %.I CRY SuDmiuW On 9-13-07 FtR DOZERAXCAVATOR TREADS CREATE CLEAT IMPEns PARALLEL TO THE SLOPE CONTOUR DURING SUMMER CONSTRUCTION PERIODS THE SITE SHOULD BE M SEEDED AFTER TRACKING IS COMPLETED. DURING WINTER CONSTRUCTION MULCH SHOULD BE EVENLY SPREAD OVER AREA AND THEN THE TRACKING UTILIZED 70 HELP ANCHOR THE MULCH TO THE DISIVRBED SOIL. A MINIMUM MULCH APPLICATION RA IE OF 90 POUNDS PER 1000 SQUARE FEET SHALL BE REWIRED. SURFACE ROUGHENING METHOD (TRACKING) tow iR000.t cGxwuXm r LTXs AFTER TIDE FINISHED GRADE HAS BEEN ESTABUSdED AND THE FERIILIM SPREAD, PLANT THE SPECIFIED SEED MIXTURE AT A RAPE OF 4 POUNDS PER 1000 SQUARE FEET AND WORK FIRMLY INTO THE SOIL APPLY SEED OA THE PREPARED SEED BED WITH APPROVED MECHANICAL SEEDERS OR HYOROSEEONG EQUIPMENT. UPON COMPLETION OF THE AROVE PLANTING OPERATIONS, ROLL ALL AREAS WITH A WATER RUED GARDEN ROLLLR, LEANING ME SURFACE OF ALL AREAS TRUE M GRACE. SMOOTH, AND FREE FROM HOLLOWS OR OTHER IRRE ULARTVES. DHOROUOMLY WATER ALL NEWLY PLANTED LAWNS WMEDIAMY AFTER PLANTING USING A FINE SPRAY. PROTECT BANKS AND SWALES AND PREVENT OR REPAIR EROSION THAT OCCURS BANKS MALES OR OTHER GRADED AREAS MAT HAVE BEEN WASHED OUT OR HAVE BECOME DAMAGED SHALL BE REP RED IMMEMATRY. UNLESS APPROVAL IS GRANTED BY ME IU00WER TO PLANT OFF SEASON, SEEDNG WILL BE CONDUCTED ONLY DURING ME PMOD FROM APRIL 15 TO XNE I OR AUGUST 15 TO OCTOBER 15. SO AS NOT TO CAUSE INTItFERENCE, NO SEEDING IS TO PROCEED BEFORE OTHER PHASES OR ME WORK HAS PROGRESSED SUFFIGENTLY. SEED SHALL SE FRESH, CLEAN, NEW SEED. SEED WHICH HAS BECOME WET AND/OR MOLDY WttL NOT BE ACCEPTABLE THE FO LOTWNG SEED NIXMRE SHALL BE USED: CREEPING RED FESCUE JD-40 85 KENNCKY BLUEGRASS 1G-40 BG PERENNIAL RYE 25-M w RED TOP 0-5 BS %41 SEEDING 2005 iFU0EY1 Ctwwenrvc ENpxEtRS DESIGN CRITERIA BAG SPECIFICATIONS: APPROAMATELY 18 1/2-INCH X 28-INCH POLYPROPYLENE BAGS. STONE- 1/2-INCH CRUSHED STONE HEIGHT OF STONE BAGS ABOVE CULVERT INVERTS CONSTRUCT A MINIMUM OF TWO COURSES OF BAGS THE STONE -FILLED BAGS SMALL BE STACKED TO A HEIGHT EQUAL TO 1/2 THE DIAMETER OF THE CULVERT BONG PROTECTED. 2 WINGED HEADWALL INLET PROTECTION NOT TO uE lER T.�9,�IZTIDN AFIFR FL tlt ONE- rl �F(j�,T�tp,, At A REA RATEINLA=30 POUNDS PER AFEET. LIMEY T�M"r-^�'We�D AT A RAMIR2 TONS PER ACRE. I -ME SEED MIXTURE SHOWN BEL08 Wxt BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 150 PQUNOS PE,R--ABBE 4 SEED SW SE FRESH, CLEAN, *E* SEED. SEED WHICH HAS &wQMF WET AND/GR MOLDY IIRL NOT BE ACCEPTABM-BLME FOLOWNO SEED MI nM SHALL BE USED: cDMMON NAME a Br WErcHr CREEPING RED FESCUE 35% FIESTA H PERENNIAL RYE GR 20R ANNUAL RYE GRASS USA' TALL FESCUE I= KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS IOC WHITE CLOVER SR HIGHLAND SENTGTASS 5C NOTE: DORMANT SEEDING SHALL NOT OCCUR MESS ME SOL TEMPERATURE IS COYSSTENTLY BELOW 55 DEGREES FARENHEIT. 5 DORMANT SEEDING y TST�c�s� o�,�e E-Nmos f nu iii�mi im_ -I� n � nri� an mom nu�n�i un=mi miamt=un=mf=_ l�ll�y �xnn=�n n)I??n��= CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS FOR TYPICAL GRASSED SWALE 1. SIDE SLOPES FOR GRASSED SWALE SHALL NOT EXCEED 3.1. IN AREAS WHERE SIDE SLOPES WILL EXCEED 11. APPLY ERGSYON CONTROL BLANKETS TO STAMLT GROUND 2. SEED AND MULCH ALL AREAS OF GRASSED SWALE (SEE MAINTENANCE AND TIME OF PLACEMENT) PERf`CRM ALL SEEDING PRIOR TO APPI.T EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS g rMCAL GRASSED SWALE S IMbELL CCMSvtRNG FNpNEFRs UST REWSW 012.1/. DR-1TJ35 RIP -RAP SHALL BE A VAU GRADED ROCK MIXTURE DOWN TO T INCH SIZE PARTICLES SUCH MAT 50 PERCENT OF THE NLXTURE BY WEIGHT SHALL BE LARGER THAN ME LEAST GMENSION. TYPE SIZE (WCHES) LEAST DIMENSION P-2L14 1-5 2 1 1-12 4 2 T 38 1 3 15 4 3-BO 20 A WELL GRADED BOG( MIXTURE SHALL BE DEFINED AS A MIXiVRE COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF THE LARGER STONE SINS. BUT WITH A SUFFIOENT MIXTURE OF OTHER SIZES TO FILL THE PROdtE$9NELY SMALLER VOIDS BETWEEN STONES STONE FOR RP -RAP SHALL BE APPROVED, ROUGH. BROKEN, QUARRY STONE WIN IRREGULAR FACES PER- MITTING PLACEMENT IN A TIGHT INTERLOCKING MANNER WUH ME SMALLER STONES FILLING VDIDS BETWEEN LARGER STONES THE STONES SHALL BE HARD, SOUND, RESSTANT M WATER ACTION, WEATHERING AND SUITABLE FOR THE PURPOSE INTENDED. t5 RIP -RAP NOTES RECEIVE® SEP 18 2007 City of So. Burlington Technology Park South Burlington, VT LOT 2 OWNER: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)860-1691 Fax: (802)860-1695 DESIGN BUILDER: ReArch Company 30 Community Drive Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 06403 Phone:(802)863-8727 Fax: (802)863-8734 ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 6224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne, VT 05482 Phone:(802)985-5595 Fax: (802)965-5565 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC 125 Main Street Reading, MA 01867 Phone:(781)670-g990 Fax: (781)670-9939 CIVIL ENGINEER: Trudell Counsulting Engineers 478 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)879-6331 Fax: (802)879-0060 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SE Group 131 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Phone:(802)862-0098 Fax: (802)865-2440 MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box 525 43 Krupp Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)864-3800 Fax: (802)864-3904 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Omega Electric 25 Omega Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)862-0517 Fax: (802)862-4349 FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protection P.O. Box 2D04 Colchester, VT 05446 Phone:(802)878-6594 Fax: (802)878-2186 DATE: 08/24/2007 REVISIONS — No. Date i I Flna Cty SMDMMPfw 9-13-0T N0�7937 ry 3-PS -3 2d G— 2-PG - '\ • ` \ O V$R NORTHERN \ RE4LOFLOWERM1 K \ \ \ \ TECHNOLOGY PARK -LOT 02 PLANT LIST ml BOTANICAr..NAME COMMON NAME - SI7F AEMARKA TREES AC AnneI el nada ie Sorvieebe is 6.8' BBB, Single Stem AF Ac ft A mmn blaze Red/Silver Maple 10. 2 1/2 - 3" Cal B&B 6 Brancbmg Ht, (Min.) AR Ac h Red onset' Red Maple 20 2 112 - 3" C.I. Is: 6' Branenbrg HL (Mi..) GT GtodiW. ni md, os Sh,& Master Honeylocaat 12 2 1/2. 3" Cel H&B, 6' Breaching Ht. (Mire) MS Malue sazgentit Sargent Cmbepple 33 2. 2 1/2" Cal. B&B, Nit PC Pyre+caileryene CnnnficleeY Cn ntileer Peer 8 21/2-3"Cal.. B&B, Fall PG Pica glaoca Wh to Sp.. 36 5.6" B&B, NIl PN Pinue ngn. Auettlan Pine 14 7-g' IN, U—bamd PS Pm trob Whtte Pme 71 7-8 B&B, Un he—d QP t2u PI Ina PiniO lI 610 21/2-3"Cal B&B,6 ➢ranching Ht(Mm. v B • , a. \ \ 2•JIk'\ \ ., \ SR Syringe reaculafa Japanese Tree Lilac 19 8 - 10, B&B, S fin long Lit, (Mm.) Single Stem }"\\.• \ \� \\ \ GRO DVFRc + + \ \ \ \\ PT Pachysandre tenninelis Pachyaandn, 973 Bare Root 8".... Tnangtdated T17 A4 + + + + v SHB 13S CR Comua [acemoan GreyDogw 70 306" B&B Plem 60' o c Cs Co Dogwood 237 18-24" B&B,1116' o.0 \ mus sericaa'kentl' Rodoeiar I v \ \ \ • \\ NJ,: \ \ i \ N liar ve[ticulala'Wmter 1 Wmterberry 55 18-M, B&B, Plant 60' ac \` \ \ .,\•.; \ IVJ ➢niperlshoria'Jim Dnn BuHfury 16 1&24" B&➢, Plant 60"oc, T T. pid- talia'Au Harbor' Aar He.Yee,mper 318 2430 30'oo...t3 fated m - \ '\ - \ pcus gu \ TC Tama cuepraefa'Nena' Japencae Yew I l8 24.70" B&B, Plant 30" o.c ff l h \\ \ \\\ I \\ \ m i ! shobeos Sprme 30" o o. T evguUed Ps SP Sp njnpono4Snirob2 CA Chnkif gn simplex Bugbene 239 1 G.I. Plant 24' o.e. J \ CL Chelone lyonu Pink wellhead 400 1 Gal. Plant 18" O.C. T. \ CP. Caltha palustris Mush Mangold 211 10.1. Plant 24' o c. PR. Fiitpeodula rubre Ventnts' Mead.—.t 306 10.1. Plant 241o.c IR Iris —Bicolor Blue Flag Me 149 1 0 1. Plent 24" O.C. 'y \ RE Rndboolde fnlgidn Bleak eyed Susan 439 1 U. Plant 15".x. SEEDING "L.D. Oliver Nortluro Region Wildfl—,Mi," by Oliver Sad, Apply 1/2lbJ3000e.f. 2,000 s.f. I6-SR- 4-SR 2-SR • "4 S T. ___7-SR =i'PJ—\\\\ \ .\ '\ -------------- \ - -------------------- " Z �.0 1v I+ + _ 2JP C ' .I i _ — `• ,&CB _ 27-FR B-GR \ \\ \ OfS + _ + �— .I ,act. -°`� \\ \•\ \\\ \ \ \\ \ � '" I ® 2 d \ \ \ \ \\ \ ' 27-OL V A A A t I, + 2MRF 'v\ -', i I � i \\ \ -oP V --__-3-APGT 2-AR LIIELE 4A3LS \ a- 4 `\ \ 4 PG 9CS \ \\\•. 4-P 8 M_ -. .. -. 4-G- 3-AC 2. ssc I_ I Technology Park South Burlington, VT Lot # 2 OWNER: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)860-1691 Fax: (802)860-1695 DESIGN BUILDER: Rekch Company 30 Community Drive Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)863-8727 Fax: (802)863-8734 ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne, VT 05482 Phone:(802)985-5595 Fax: (802)985-5565 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC 125 Main Street Reading, MA 01867 Phone:(781)670-9990 Fax: (781)670-9939 I CIVIL ENGINEER: Trudell Counsulting Engineers 478 Blair Park Road I� P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)879-6331 1 Fax: (802)879-0060 `) LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SE Group 131 Church Street Budington, VT 06401 Phone:(802)662-0098 Fax: (802)865.2440 MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box 525 43 Krupp Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)864-3800 Fax: (802)864-3904 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Omega Electric 25 Omega Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)862-0517 Fax: (802)862-4349 FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protection P.O. Box 2004 Colchester, VT 05446 Phone:(802)878-6594 Fax: (802)878-2186 I ` DATE: 08/24/2007 I REVISIONS I No. Dote IS .few_ ►c�. +:•a�lysl3sgv:�r e� l.�e;r� p --�c+t . - ��ulM ,W. IN 'j - .; ,.. l� �. _„�� +�;rl�;�+,,<. .�=�t�-wee -----_ ,�� _ ��1�1��,��►\�` "ii --------- - may.----- - ---------------------------- Technology Park South Burlington, VT I a Lot # 2 _.-- ---- —._—. - --- —-- OWNER: I Technology Park Partners _ 30 Community Drive Suite 4 I i South Burlington, VT 05403 _ Phone: (802)860-1691 I Fax: (802)860.1695 Uj DESIGN BUILDER: z � ReArch Company I i 30 Community Drive Suite 6 U South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)863-8727 I I ! I I I Fax: (802)863-8734 ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture I I j 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne, VT 05482 Phone:(802)985-5595 Fax: (802)985-5565 II I I •. I 'I� I STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC 125 Main Street I + + + + I + I + + + + + Reading, MA 01867 Phone:(781)670-9990 — — -- -- — ----- Fax: (781)870-9939 CIVIL ENGINEER: _.__ _..-----------'----'—" Trudell Counsulting Engineers 4AP- I so 478 Blair Park Road op + + + + + +r + P.O. Box 308 .,- + + + + + + I I Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)879-6331 I -.... -. - , I I Fax: (802)879-0060 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: BE Group -.... _._.-_..__ 131 Church Street I I Burlington, VT 05401 I ( I Phone:(802)862-0098 Fax: (so2)665-2aao i I I I D MECHANICAL ENGINEER: v EnglandNew Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box525 43 Krupp Drive SFQ Williston, VT 05495 P ` 18 20 Phone:(802)864-3800 �& -1 °f I Fax: (802)864.3904 - ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: o. e Omega Electric rlinWonI 25 Omega Drive I, c„ Williston, VT05495 Phone: 802 862-0517 (802)862-4349 FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protection 1 T - B -- -- --=------�� — -- —T-- -- ---------- ------ -- _ -\ , -- Colchester, VT 05446 Phone:(802)878-6594 Fax: (802)878-2186 I DATE: 08f24/2007 I i REVISIONS I No. Date tup t/ • — ; / _ - 4 Planting _ - Plan .. \ 1 Technology Park South Burlington, VT Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 GRAVEL DRIP EDGE, / / / / / 3/4" CRUSHED STONE GRAVEL DRIP EDGE, INSTALL FLUSH WITH SURROUNDING GRADE COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY `LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MIRAFI 140N FILTER FABRIC, OR APPROVED EQUAL 3/16" RYERSON GALVANIZED STEEL EDGING OR APPROVED EQUAL, PAINTED BLACK W/ 18" SPIKES COMPACTED SUBGRADE %CGRAVEL DRIP EDGE SCALE 1/2" = V-0" -grave npe ge. wg SPACING'D° R 'A' NUMBER OF PLANTS/SO. FT WO.C. 31,20° .12 00 oc 28.00" '18 24°OC. 20,78' 28 12'O,C. 10.41 '.IS 10°O.C. 884" I'm 8"OC 8SW 2.60 S'O.C. 5.18" 4.61 NOTE: PLANT QUANTITIES DETERMINED BY MULTIPLYING AREA (80. FT.) BY NUMBER OF PLANTS'SO, FT. FOR REQUIRED SPACING, PLANT SPACING -— PLANT CENTER PLANT ROW SEE PLANTING PLAN FOR SPACING AND QUANTITIES --- — -- SEE PLANTING LIST FOR PLANT SPACING — SET AT ORIGINAL PLANTING DEPTH FINISH GRADE MULCH AS SPECIFIED PLANTING MIX AS SPECIFIED SUB GRADE 180 \ _ ALIGN STAKES PARALLEL —EW/ ROAD OR WALKS 180" / EDGE OF WALK OR CURB A. TREE STAKING ALONG ROAD OR WALKS WIND \DIRECTIONEVAILING ALIGN STAKES PARALLEL W/ DIRECTION OF PREVAILING WIND. ALL STAKES TO BE CONSISTENT. B. TREE STAKING IN OPEN SPACES O / 126 120°\I 3" CALIPER TREES OR LARGER - ALIGN 2 STAKES PARALLEL 1 _ _ / O �— EDGE OF WALK OR CURB C. TREE GUYING C TREE STAKING LAYOUT NO SCALE p-stake.dwg PLANT SPACING PLANT CENTER PLANT ROW ALL EQUAL OR AS SHOWN ON PLANTING PLAN SPACING'0" ROW-9 NUMBER OF PLANT"O. FT. F O.C. 51.88' 0.04 4' O.C. 41.57 0.07 W O.C. 31M0 0.12 30' O,C. mm, 0.18 24` O.C. 20.78' 0.28 NOTE: QUANTITY OF SHRUBS AND SPACING AS NOTED IN PLANTING SCHEODLE. .--FINISH GRADE MULCH, AS SPECIFIED SHRU:Mp�MO OIp�d1... ROOTBALL PLANTING MIX AS SPECIFIED SUB GRADE ar. PERENNIAL PLANTING SHRUB PLANTING _ C SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" p-peren.dwg V SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" p-shrub.dwg NOTE: EXAMINE ENTIRE TREE AND REMOVE " ALL NURSERY TAGS, ROPE, STRING, OR SURVEYORS TAPE TO PREVENT FUTURE GIRDLING. SURROUNDING SOIL SHOULD NOT EXCEED 80% COMPACTION, DRAINAGEy WILL BE REQUIRED IF COMPACTED "-- SOILS ARE PRESENT a 12" X 1 112" NYLON/COTTON WEAVE wst--'-� -- TOP OF ROOTBALL TO BE PLACED TIES WITH 3/4" GROMMETS AT SAME LEVEL THAT IT WAS 1/8" 7 X 7 STEEL CABLE FASTENED F�� GROWN IN NURSERY W/ (2) ZINC PLATED CABLE CLAMPS. • SLIGHT ROOT FLARE SHOULD COVER GUYS W/3' OF 3/8" DIA. SLIP a BE EVIDENT PLASTIC TUBING. F 2" WELL COMPOSTED BARK MULCH F TURNBUCKLE, EYE 8 EYE, ZINC F CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP PLATED, 10 5!8" OPEN LENGTH, 3t8" FROM ROOTBALL THREAD DIA. INSTALL W/ TURNBUCKLE IN OPEN POSITION. PLANT MIX • 3 PARTS NATIVE SOIL TEMPORARY WATERING BASIN o • 1 PART WELL COMPOSTED (3) DUCKBILL TYPE ANCHORS --� - COW MANURE BREAK APART EDGE OF EXCAVATION W/ SHOVEL AND BLEND PLANT MIX " yA ✓�� FINISH GRADE /� �'`--- FILTER FABRIC W/ EXISTING SOIL TO PROVIDE GRAVEL TRANSITION TO UNDISTURBED GRADE. A; < �A ��% i'� / -' — 4" PERFORATED PIPE WHERE APPLICABLE, PERFORATIONS UNDISTURBED GRADE: LAID DOWN UNDER DRAIN. ESCAVATE ONLY TO SPECIFIED PLANTING DEPTH TO ENSURE m n. see specs. m n. STABLE BASE EVERGREEN PLANTING /1 SCALE 1/4" = V-0" p-evertree.dwg NOTE: EXAMINE ENTIRE TREE AND REMOVE ALL NURSERY TAGS, ROPE, STRING, OR SURVEYORS TAPE TO PREVENT FUTURE GIRDLING. SURROUNDING SOIL SHOULD NOT EXCEED 80% COMPACTION, DRAINAGE WILL BE REQUIRED IF COMPACTED SOILS ARE PRESENT WIRE TIES W/ HOSE LOOPS, SEE SPECS. FASTEN WIRE BELOW POINT OF MAJOR BRANCHING OR TO MAJOR OUTSIDE TRUNK. 2 }" HARDWOOD STAKES. ALIGN-- STAKES PARALLEL W/ ROAD/ WALKS—� OR PARALLEL W/ DIRECTION OF PREVAILING WIND. RE DETAIL C/0.2 ALL STAKES TO BE CONSISTENT. TEMPORARY WATERING BASIN BREAK APART EDGE OF EXCAVATION W/ SHOVEL AND BLEND PLANT MIX W1 EXISTING SOIL TO PROVIDE TRANSITION TO UNDISTURBED GRADE UNDISTURBED GRADE EXCAVATE ONLY TO SPECIFIED PLANTING DEPTH TO ENSURE STABLE BASE R'4:-C SEp 61 So eUr/in9t®qh TOP OF ROOTBALL TO BE PLACED AT SAME LEVEL THAT IT WAS GROWN IN NURSERY. SLIGHT ROOT FLARE SHOULD BE EVIDENT. T' WELL COMPOSTED BARK MULCH CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM ROOTBALL PLANT MIX - 3 PARTS NATIVE SOIL 1 PART WELL COMPOSTED COW MANURE FINISH GRADE FILTER FABRIC GRAVEL 4" PERFORATED PIPE WHERE APPLICABLE. PERFORATIONS LAID DOWN UNDER DRAIN rQ1 TREE PLANTING u SCALE 1/4" = 1'-0" d-deckree,dwg Technology Park South Burlington, VT Lot #2 OWNER: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)860-1691 Fax: (802)860-1695 DESIGN BUILDER: ReArch Company 30 Community Drive Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)863-8727 Fax: (802)863-8734 ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne, VT 05482 Phone:(802)985-5595 Fax: (802)985.5565 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC 125 Main Street Reading, MA 01867 Phone:(781)670-9990 Fax: (781)670-9939 CIVIL ENGINEER: Trudell Counsulting Engineers 478 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 06495 Phone:(802)879.6331 Fax: (802)879-0060 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SE Group 131 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Phone:(802)862-0098 Fax: (802)865.2440 MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box 525 43 Krupp Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)864-3800 Fax: (802)864-3904 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Omega Electric 25 Omega Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)862.0517 Fax: (802)8624349 FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protection P.O. Box 2004 Colchester, VT 05446 Phone:(802)878-6594 Fax: (802)878-2186 I DATE: 08/24/2007 1 REVISIONS No. Date I LANDSCAPE DETAILS I Aw Technology Park South Burlington, VT r S' S" r' r %'�\♦•�''\ \ `\°° ' . Lot #2 a d FIXTURE AND POLE SPECIFICATIONS • $° r r r %' C.....`°. r r r r ��`> r r r r r 8' r e % r g C r a C r r r r r r C r r C C r S C r C C C C e _ r r r g s r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r. %° r Y r r,: r �.c- - %° Y S° r r C C r C r r r r Y C e°� C LI HTrPOCE Y .�' Y.:4 a Y, g %• g c° .s•.. G Y r r a• r G Y r Y G Y Y Y ), r C. r .,r —77 r r r %° g° r %° r r r s' r r r E2,7 ...-a°;.•.-%• g r r :g s° %• C.. g g \° €"... r' r�\ r r e' r Y r Y r Y s' e'• Y Y e° r x° - ----------------- r r r r r r e r r r r- �? r %€; C g �\ % %° r,% Y r r r r r r Y r r G G r r V r; .r .T r r %'. Y r %^ r r r ..g.. r a• Y %t �°%• Y � r r r r e e . C e. r z' �--: ^sue_-�:'Y'+-r�"-...,� g'\ � '..g'\ � g'\ \ %'`r r r r r %• r r Y %� s r . r Y,+ ' �s' .. b •\ �• c',� r� � -,s\ k \�, g• C &, ,� s `r % s r r� •. e\,\r, g\ r r r r r - is C�a i \ j � �� \ r r r. C $' .$' �`` g 8�\•C Ir °C �'\ r. b\e C.•\C• r r S' Y C _ I 7r` p� �y f'� \ r C 8' S' I 8° I� r ® L9 ® 11 ® ;.J, \P\\C�\�.K Z` ` &' I� C a' r G r r e r r r r e• �� ) - !-ram G w r d' 'r Y. r� o° �° r �r e\ r `.€� r Y`v %• r r% yJ C r r �' \e&' C\\r\� C\., $' re r r r r r r r r% r \s &' r•, r er C 8' .. %' %° r G r rA Y S• LKdH3°P r _ �.. r �,� T .4, _ a �..u_ r r r r g rl �k •\ �°� �° \%� �° s° r\• a• a• e' F !)' D Q D \ \ r s• e e r s•. 2.1 F OT G P L-: _ .. ., "" G Y r r r r `r\�.r -g �'\,\ 'r, r\ \Y\ Y \\ r Y Y C 8' r C r 8' %° C C C r °6•� e v 8• k• }}v K• v _. _g--,.g.,-.,..»-•-... C 6' r C C r r I6'\.\ \r, \•S' �" S' E' `..r r \ C\ 6 6\ Y` C 'r C' - C T C 5° C• G ■' r r r Y � ._=z>r° ("$, '�" Y r S° r r C r \r• r `E'�\ C �', •...�• S° r �Y\ r\ C\\ r• $'`\Y�'... •\\Y\�C\`B° r \•� \\\C 9'\\ C' P�\ \ g r ti G G' e t' e e r c• �., r r C r %. Yri T I G -.t�� r r C C r r r.• r �" r _ r C' r M". k e r j g• . L2' \F'O�IAJ�S!#' l V. r C r g° r r g' r C 2•., f; e'` r --- '.r r C G C° r yCi e° c C r P' �C°'`,\Y\C'%'\ '.�" .r C\`�• •r Y''C �,•R° Z'�`#' 6'\Y \\ r _ r r ..Y Y C• G• r ., G• J ,p° G G. i&° r r r � Y �%:. � Y'.`&`\C�'\r�. r r\ y=�t 'C\ � •r Y\ r '�5•'.. C \Y\ '� \8� . ��' \ \•\ \ r a' %' r a° r r \\\g° \\ {°\ \Y G'\�C, '2 r C r C I &• C E' C r'.. Y B° . 'r \ C� \C °\ `\ O f11P E� ._SR yr- r r %r....\r.'`.s r\\ r� TD r C C r rl r r r r. C r r r r' .&'\ C` '° r\ \r. r \V\\\ 6° r C r 8• g. C �' ,°�.I C i —.r &° e — C 8°�. C IY r C �j�,---5� C Y.��CI C ,:C\ $° C\ \C..,'�\$•.. g^ `r \\\\. LIGHT POLE %• r e %L2. O N E r �' �• c i .� c• G - �• y- r �• \ ' r .- � e .g---�•�. c e e� r r �• Y ,' r e a r r• �•r\\ g \ \ \ \ '\ \ C Y&' a• r r r r a• Y r r r r r d r r r � � H r a e _` E r s' €' •..,\' i r %• Y r r r r r r r r G d... Y r r r e Y Y �r ,.. >ne z-_`r__ _"- 2. Orl, I �%j2AIS D%, TY'�% g•..... \\:.• \\ \\. `.i IV r r C C C r R'� GI -I. G' �I G' _ °�C C i8' 0' ".!' _G Y C &'\ 8" ti• � "_\�—w�-- ter" �— "— _ C C T6�\ r \ °' r "," %'�C C \ '�\ \ _ _ _ G r a•y� r r r�avr-r A s• r r %• r r r r r e"� r ( �� G r %' �• r r r r u -�-G` -• G �' r G' ti' \ . r C e' Y� I .. C Y _C r .. e-r, r C�\ C �B�v, 8 r• r \� 4E° R° r r -s`— ' e Y,.. 6��r�, \ C ....5 ..`..if G' !G• ,�,! �e .,.'.'�° \e G° G° r G _C _ C r'. S' r`, E� S' S r r\ •\\\ C 8° r r r C 8.� r C C'r, %• / "° 6'll 'CI ., —., u u r r ^. r r Y \ S r r K Y``\ ",' G• G` ,,1,1 C \r %" C. \\r %• V\,.. C \ \ \\ r Jr, r %° a S Y C e� i• I $�' %/ C & r > � G° 6 r r r r r r% r r rr e r r r I r r B' ... 81 C V. 4f „r r k B' a I e - Fri C• G' r r r C 'r d OWNER: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)860-1691 Fax: (802)860-1695 DESIGN BUILDER: ReArch Company 30 Community Drive Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)663-8727 Fax: (802)863-8734 ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne, VT 05482 Phone:(802)985-5595 Fax: (802)985-5565 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC 125 Main Street Reading, MA 01867 Phone:(781)670-9990 Fax: (781)670-9939 CIVIL ENGINEER: Trudell Counsulting Engineers 478 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)879-6331 Fax: (802)879-0060 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SE Group 131 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Phone:(802)862-0098 Fax: (802)865.2440 MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box 525 43 Krupp Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)864-3800 Fax: (802)864-3904 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Omega Electric 25 Omega Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)662-0517 Fax: (802)862.4349 FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protection P.O. Box 2004 Colchester, VT 05446 Phone:(802)878-6594 Fax: (802)878-2186 G - � r `. r r r Y. r r %• s r \v� , A �® DATE: 08/24/2007 I.S(1-(:[)NT()l1R KEY _ -- r r- Y % r '' a r G s t� e e r r r Y a� r•\ r r r r C E r 8' C Irr'_ B' e\"8`. Y ,-,.._N•-_6'. C C� 6 r ffi' '>'yn 'k�_G C Y' 5' C "' p r G e' z C S" r r r &' g'\ r\ .,'\\ \\\\, r r r r r r «� Y e r � .a _, s• z ' �' ® �' .. _ _ � �_ � �a -� y n N � r a e r g ' �\�° � `r G C* r r %• %° ., �/ � r �r � r �•_ �; G' c a ....�,..�:�,_ -r �.��; � - - __ r %° r r %• r e r _ a t�__ ``�' r r r S° r r r err Fixture A Manufacturer. Cooper Fixture: Epci Modern - EML Configuration: 2@180' Optics: Type IV Lamp: 250MH Lens: FG (Flat Tempered Glass) Mid Section: SR (Solid Rings) Shade: FL (Flute) Color: Black Options: --- Pole: 22' Note: When poles are mounted on raised concrete base, pole heights will need to be adjusted accordingly. Fixture B TManufacturer: Cooper Fixture: Epci Modern - EML Configuration: 1 Optics: Type IV Lamp: 25OMH Lens: FG (Flat Tempered Glass) Mid Section: SR (Solid Rings) Shade: FL (Flute) Color: Black Options: -- Pole: 22' Note: When poles are mounted on raised concrete base, pole heights will need to be adjusted accordingly. Fixture C TManufacturer: Cooper Fixture: Epcl Modern -EML Configuration: 2@180' Optics: Type IV Lamp: 25OMH Lens: FG (Flat Tempered Glass) Mid Section: SR (Solid Rings) Shade: FL (Flute) Color: Black Options: -- Pole: 12' Fixture D Manufacturer: Louis Poulsen Fixture: Ni Configuration: 1 Optics: Type III Lamp: 701 Color: Black Options: Height Mounted 1 Yon Building - Fixture E Manufacturer. B-K Lighting Fixture: LS (Lite Star) Lamp Type: 5 (35waft, 40° Flood) Finish: Black Mounting: 7 (Uplight) Lens Type: 9 (Clear) Shellding: 11 (Honeycomb Baffle) �� III No. REVISDateS Of'�+0 Wr �r Y �_;_.�' j '"w,.,_,,,. u - ,�c ,..•" ,� \;�� _ > - STATISTICAL AREA SUMMARY -"--r'"'- _ r - -.us. ' .:�`--�� °'� _�• '�„ f D ... Grid Type: Horizontal Illuminance at finish grade. - -.... ._.. -__--. Y a� r -� -� `\ _ - Grid Units: Footcandles r g r a( r r e• r a' - �g° Tom'--e-'i!� %• `. C r r r r °° , r r. :+. '1 -e% �' - C ,a''. Y r r r r r r r Ave Max Min Ave/Min Max/Min o 15 as' w ' — j __ ear"�„__- __ asC=-'.5-.- " .,` . \. \ •\ ---r"/ r r... �'� ,s` - •.�°.:" r�., _. Ir '--'-- r r r---s•--'g- •�-� e---B` r era Parking -� a Overall P 1.56 8.10 0.30 5 20 27 00 — — �, •.y < Disclaimer. LIGHTING PLAN -• _ - _ - - This analysis was calculated in accordance with published IES calculation methods an r r %• r %• __ g _- r %' r r r a• r r r ,,''r r r "a° g' r e° r r S• r r Y r r r r r r r �° >'-z°--r- "%°-"Y-"_- ---e=--r--�--g o Y r Y procedures. with the data as entered by the user. This analysis is based on tested ES '"" --- - -- -> ..., d , • - _ - » - —r - -- - - - photometric data, light loss factors as defined in the LLF value. This analysis is a %' _ r Y r d .. sa r ,« g.. r r s . r r Y. r. r r r r only as t c 4 \ mathematical model of real life situations, and tt can be accurate as the model itself. � --- -- Calculated values may vary from actual measurements in certain situations. SE Group is no responsible for light output deviations due to lamp/ballast combinations or other variables. ISO -CONTOUR FOOTCANDLE VALUE 1.00 0.50 0.25 0 Technology Park South Burlington, VT F "o 0 91 91 r 91 r r g. g. I, r g- c- r r 2 Lot # 2 t g. g. g. g. g. r g. T g. g. 9' If 9' r 9' 9' 91 91 V 9' r Ir C* w g- v g- w g. g. r r C. g. C. E. r 91 1 r IV 91 9 0 CF OWNER: 0 g* g, g, g Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 t g, g, g, v c- v r r 9' 9, 9' South Burlington, VT 05403 0 - - -- - _ - -- - -- - -- 0 fir Phone: (802)860-1691 1. - -_ --- _ - - . Fax: (802)860-1695 . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . g. g. r r C, r 91 r r 91 r V 9, 9, 9, r 9, c, 9, r T 9* 9, g i = DES N BUILDER: 0 L IG 0 C. r w C. g. Ir w 9' r r C ReArch Company 30 Community Drive Suite 8 0 South Burlington, VT 05403 r r ;1 g-1 r 91 91 r 9' 9' 9 9' 9' r 9' 91 r 9' 9, 9' 9' r r r Ir 91 91 r r 9 g C E 4 C g 9* 91 91 91 C, 91 r gr 9' 9' 9' 9' 9, 9, T 9 -------- ilt - I ---. , I Phone:(802)863-8727 0 1 i , I .. , I Ir Ir C r t r I I I I . . . . . . . g* r r E. c Fax: (802)863-8734 w X. v r e Ir� r r 91 r 91 9' r V 91 r 9, 9, 9 V 9, 9, 9, r 9, 9, r r v r ARCHITECT: ------- --- 0 o o--o 9'1 9, 9, 1 9, t 9, g. g. g. g. v C. g. E. g. C. p P g. g. g. r r c, c, r c, g, r c, c, g, c, g- r g- c S2 Architecture 9' 5224 Shelburne Rd. r r r 9' r r gr T fr W r r 9' 9' 9' g' r ' Shelburne, VT 05482 r Ir r C r r r 9* g, T C, g* g, r g, r -. r g, g, g, v g, r C. w V r r g. r C. t ir 9' r 9' 9' r 9' r r 9' 9' r r 9- C r 9- 9- 9' Ir I Phone:(802)985-5595 g. g, Fax: (802)985-5565 Ir r 91 r r 91 fr r - r 9' r r 97 r 9* 91 .1 91 91 e 91 T r g T r T I ir 91 w r, ff- r g. tr g. r C. r� g. g. r r g. r r r c- r r g. r r g. g. g. g. r g. g. r ff. r r c STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC g, r Ir g, g" Ir g, v T U, g, r r r g T r g g g r t C, C, g* r g C, 9' 9' V 9' 9' 9' 9' X V 9 r r 9' r 9' V Ir r 9 125 Main Street Reading, MA 01867 ----------- -- C. r g. r r E- g- g. T r g. r g. w g. C Phone:(781)670-9990 9' T Ir� 1�1 C. n. r ff- v n. g. r gr C. g. g. g. C 91 9, Irr r 9' V C, 9, T r T - 9' 9* 9' 9' w 9; Fax: (781)670-9939 e Ir 9, 9' 91 r 91 9* 91 r' w r c' 9' t 9* g' r "' E' c' r r r g CIVIL ENGINEER: - TT- i F.� or j r --r-7 r ri ri ei Trudell Counsulting Engineers r------------ 478 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 gr r 91 91 Ir T 91 91 r Ir gr 9* 9 Phone:(802)87M331 -OM Fax: (802)879 r ;r r g. g. C* r 9, 9, r T 9, 9, 9, r C, g, C, rl Ir 9-1 t. r r r g. g. g. C. V 2. r C. E. g. g. g. C. er; r e r r g g LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: r 9' 9 BE Group r w 91 r r g. g. g. r r r Ir 9' 9' T r V 9' T r 9'1 9' 9' 9* r 9' r 9' r Ir 11 9' W 8' V 9' 9* 9' w 9' 9 131 Church Street �LIGFLT PDL Burlington, VT 05401 r, g. r r r g. r g. g. it C. 9' C, T 91 - r 9' r 9' 9' C POO-rING FLUSH, TYP. 2, g, g, r v C. lt_ �r r E. r r w C. r r r -0098 j Phone:(802)862 g g 9* r r g g 9 Fax: (802)865-2440 g. r g. g. g. r r r g. I r C. C, r 9 v� �e r 91 91 r r 9, 9" r 9, r r 9, 9, 9, r 9, r r V r w 9, r w wl r rl MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. t r gr g_ 91 r 91 g. w g. C. C. e C-1 c- v g. C. V' �r r g. 9' C, 9' r r Ir r C P.O. Box 525 43 Krupp Drive E. g. T �9! r ir S. r rl 9' r r 9' 9" 9, r r 9' 9' 9' r 91 91 91 91 r C. C. g. r r g. g. C. r g. g. g 1 WI liston, VT 05495 9. Ir r 9, V 1 Phone:(802)864-3800 g., Qj�r glNOTE: POLE BASE IS TO BE ONE CONTINUOUS POUR. er r r 91 9* w r T 91 91 r 9* 91 r r g, c, g, C, g, T T c, g Fax: (802)864-3904 PRE-FABBED CONCRETE POLE BASES WILL NOT BE - VV; A.I 9, ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: ACCEPTED. (ALL POLE BASES MUST BE POURED ON SITE) Ome a Electric THE CONTRACTOR WILL TAKE SPECIAL CARE TO NOTE: POLE BASE IS TO BE ONE CONTINUOUS POUR. R, C, g" 9`1 t r g. g. ig. g. C. w C, r g. it Ir. g 9 ENSURE CONCRETE POLE BASES ARE POURED PRE-FABBED CONCRETE POLE BASES WILL NOT BE �kto �-/ f , . 25 Omega Drive Williston, VT 05495 ABSOLUTELY VERTICAL AND LEVEL. ACCEPTED. (ALL POLE BASES MUST BE POURED ON SITE) -0517 POLE THE CONTRACTOR WILL TAKE SPECIAL CARE TO -C- g. r r C. C. r C. g. r g. g. g. r E. w r r g. r Phone:(802)862 ENSURE CONCRETE POLE BASES ARE POURED Fax: (802�8624349 POLE BASE WITH V GROUT ABSOLUTELY VERTICAL AND LEVEL. r 4.' 9-jefid. FIRE PROTECTION: LIGHT POLE BASE BASEPLATE AND ANCHOR BOLTS _r LK-11 r 94 C' 9' r C, 9' 9' T 9' 9 North Country Fire Protection Wt 45* CHAMFERED EDGE (AS PER MANUFACTURERS SPECS.) P.O. BOX 2004 POLE Ichester, VT 05446 Co tj g. g. r V. III.- w C. r w 9 9* 91 91 9 Phone:(802)87"594 POLE BASE WITH V GROUT Fax: (802)878-2186 WIRE ANCHOR RODS L �IGHT POLE BASE TO BE BASEPLATE AND ANCHOR BOLTS g, 9' r 91 91 r r 91 Ir C, r r rl r r g. r r Lr r g. w C. r r 'r r 91 9 2 ABOVE FINISH GRADE (AS PRE MANUFACTURERS SPECS.) TO REINFORCING W1 45* CHAMFERED EDGE 91 ri r r 9* 91 r 91 9* 91 Ir 91 r w r, 9* -- r _--g- - DATE: 08/24/2OD7 FINISH GRADE 2- 9' 9' 9' 9' C, 9' 91 r 911 91 ri V r 9' 9' T 91 91 91 r C, 9' r 9' 1 7 TtF WIRE ANCHOR RODS REVISIONS CLAMP SUITABLE FOR- CLAMP SUITABLE FOR- TO REINFORCING No, Date DIRECT BURIAL HE I DIRECT BURIAL 9' 9' V r 91 91 91 91 r 91 ri r C, t r C, g, C, r E, E, g, T r fr g, g, r r V r r C, C #8 BARE GROUND WIRE - CONCRETE FOOTING 3500 PSI CONCRETE FOOTING 3500 PSI r r r C. r r r r r g. g. C. C. r R, k, g* #8 BARE GROUND WIRE - r Ir g. 91 9'1 C" 91 91 91 r 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 r r 91 91 1. r_ R GID GALVANIZED ELECTRICAL = RIGID GALVANIZED ELECTRICAL 9' 91 91 91 C, 91 Ir C. V r g. g. r w g. c- g- c- g. g. g. g. r, c- -s 3/4"Ox 8�0"COPPER CONDUIT SUPPLIED BY ELECTRICAL CONDUIT SUPPLIED BY ELECTRICAL CLAD GROUNDING ROD CONTRACTOR 3/4" 0 x 6-0" COPPER CONTRACTOR CLAD GROUNDING ROD - k3- 1K r 91___ r 6-05 BARS WITHIN A 645 BARS WITHIN A 6x6 10f10 W.W.F. CAGE 6x6 10/10 W.W.F. CAGE ---c r ff-- r,- w--g--r C. -w r--r ---- r --t T MAINTAIN A 3" MINIMUM MAINTAIN A3"MINIMUM 0 15, 30, 60' COVERAGE ON ALL BARS COVERAGE ON ALL BARS Ir r C. g. g. r g. r r C, _J 2' 2' LIGHTING PLAN Ir fr e LIGHT POL�E FOOTIN G-RAISED LIGHT POLE FOOTING- FLUSH L 1, SCALE 112"= V-0" Light Pole Footirg dwg SCALE 1/2' l'-O' Light Po�e ooting,clwg L2.1 O r t L� EXTEND PONTIPR4 NOR m THIS PANDN NORTH nut south sloes I KEY: MEMBRANE WATERPROOFING — DRAINAGE PIPE 4.0 AO 5.a I A9 6.0 R�c SFp , i SEE CML gUNkWS Fp1 PIPE oUT£T I i BASEMENT PLAN SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" N SCHEMATIC ONLY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION i Technology Park South Burlington, VT Lot # 2 OWNER: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)860-1691 Fax: (802)860-1695 DESIGN BUILDER: ReArch Company 30 Community Drive Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)863-8727 Fax: (802)863-8734 ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne, VT 05482 Phone:(802)985.5595 Fax: (802)985-5565 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC 125 Main Street Reading, MA 01867 Phone:(781)670-9990 Fax: (781)670.9939 CIVIL ENGINEER: Trudell Counsulting Engineers 478 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)879-6331 Fax: (802)879-OW LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SE Group 131 Church Street Burlington, VT OW1 Phone:(802)862-0096 Fax: (802)865-2440 MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box 525 43 Krupp Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)864.3800 Fax: (802)864-3904 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Omega Electric 25 Omega Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(B02)862-0517 Fax: (802)862-4349 FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protection P.O. Box 2004 Colchester, VT 05446 Phone:(802)878.6594 Fax: (802)878-2186 DATE: 5/8/2007 REMSIONS No. Date FLOOR PLAN A- 20 0 rrn 9 ror•_a P � sue (TXIRD rEaR7 —� TW SDi' RUB (SECWD fLOCR � TOP q'� 54B (FlR9T ftODR) � my a sun (TXRm nnaR) a m>,r-m P a sw (sEcaD rtaw) d .w a�E sD�e (Exsr FlnaR) I — ] 0T0. R/,SEMEXi 548 SOUT ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0" — — SOLMER c0uR5E _TO COURSE CF BRICK NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Technology Park South Burlington, VT Lot # 2 OWNER: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)860-1691 Fax: (802)860-1695 DESIGN BUILDER: ReArch Company 30 Community Drive Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 06403 Phone:(802)863-8727 Fax: (802)863-8734 ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne, VT 05482 Phone:(802)985-5595 Fax: (802)985-5565 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC 125 Main Street Reading, MA 01867 Phone:(781)670-9990 Fax: (781)670-9939 CIVIL ENGINEER: Trudell Counsulting Engineers 478 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)879-6331 Fax: (802)879-0060 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SE Group 131 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Phone:(802)862-00% Fax: (802)865-2440 MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box 525 43 Krupp Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)864-3800 Fax: (802)864-3904 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Omega Electric 25 Omega Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)862-0517 Fax: (802)862-4349 FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protection P.O. Box 2004 Colchester, VT05446 Phone:(802)878.6594 Fax: (802)878-2186 DATE: 5/8/2007 — REVISIONS No. Date - 4- 01 soot 4 , cyton PLANNING & ZONING June 30, 2015 Re: #SP-15-43 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, j R fyymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com May 28, 2015 Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: 124 Technology Park Way Site Plan Application Dear Ray: TRUDELL Consulting Engineers On behalf of our client, Technology Park Campus, LLC, Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) has prepared a Site Plan Application for 124 Technology Park Way for a reduction in the number of permitted vehicles from 139.8 trips to 82 trips. Technology Park received Final Plat approval in 1996 for a 12-lot subdivision and 647 PM peak hour trips. Each subsequent Site Plan application for individual buildings on the lots within the park has provided estimated project -generated traffic estimates using the ITE Trip Generation Manual fitted curve equation for each use, as summarized in the table below. Table t: Permitted Trips based on ITE Estimated Proiect-Generated Trnffir /Fitters Cnnre FnnntinnI Location Use Estimated Trips Cumulative Trips Subdivision (8/6/96) permitted PM Peak Hour 129,343 ft2 office; 10,000 ff2 warehouse; 82,257 ff2 It manufacturing; Lot 8A - 30 Community Drive 10,000 ff2 indoor recreation; 404.17 trips 404.17 2,000 ff2 retail food; 41,000 ff2 R&D lab; 400 ff2 short order restaurant Lot 7 - 55 Community Drive 72,000 ff2 general office 159.5 trips 563.57 Lot 2 - 124 Tech Park Way 54,459 ff2 general office 139.8 trips 703.47 Lot 3 - 88 Tech Park Way 54,459 ff2 general office 139.8 trips 843.27 A traffic volume count was conducted between 1 /20/2015 to 1 /26/2015 for the purpose of determining existing peak hour traffic volume generated by the buildings located on Community Drive. Counts were taken from 4:00 to 6:00 PM at all of the driveways for both 30 Community Drive and 55 Community Drive. Peak hour traffic counts were also conducted at Technology Park Way from 1 /5/2015 to 1 /9/2015. All buildings within the park are currently fully occupied. The following table summarizes average PM peak hour trips for each building. Page 2 of 2 124 Tech Park Way May 28, 2015 Table 2: Average PM Peak Traffic - Observed Location Trips Enter Exit Lot 8A - 30 Community Drive 392 trips 122 270 Lot 7 - 55 Community Drive 62 trips 14 48 Lot 2 - 124 Tech Park Way 77 trips 6 71 Observed PM peak hour traffic volumes were significantly lower than ITE estimates for the two office buildings in the park, located on Lot 7 and Lot 2. The mixed -use building on Lot 8A had traffic volume only slightly lower than the estimate. A meeting with the City engineer and planning staff resulted in agreement that it would be reasonable to base permitted trips for the 3 lots, and future lots, on the ITE Average Rate calculation, which calculates a number closer to the observed peak hour volume. The following table identifies the proposed trip allocation for each lot, including 124 Technology Park Way (highlighted), based on the ITE Average Rate calculation. Table 3: Proposed Trip Allocation Proposed Approval trips remaining Source Code Floor Area ITE Average Rate Subdivision Approval 647 647 s . ft. rate per 1000 SF Per Jan 2015 Count Lot SA 30 Community Dr. 404.17 242.83 ITE/Local Approval 392 Lot 7 55 Community Dr. 108 134.83 ITE Avg. Rate 710-Office 72,000 1.49 62 Lot 2 124 Tech Park Way ITE Avg. Rate 710-Office 54,459 1.49 77 Lot 3 1 88 Tech Park Way 82 -29.17 ITE Avg. Rate 710-Office 54,459 1.49 77 est. 56.67 paid to City w/ Lot 2 app SP-07-67 27.5 1 Remaining allocation Based on our understanding of the requirements for Site Plan review, we believe the submittal of material for this proposed project to be complete. If you have any questions or comments regarding this application, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at abby.dery@tcevt.com. Regards, Abigail Dery Project Engineer cc: Evan Langfeldt Enclosed: Site Plan, Application, Fee FCivil Engineering Land Surveying Landscape Arcbitecture Environmental Services , PLA1004G DATA qMA'.�aI•\ - \ iI ,_6-Y-�--�\ Technology Par]OWNER: 724 TEpMQOGY PWY. LLC 30 COWNUNI Y MW SOOT , I SOUTH BURLWGTON,VT 05103 L , �� PARCEL C South Burlington, VT PHONE: SIRIA /COMI1 '•\ ; ZONE MIXED R/OUS TRIAL/GYAMMERpAI Tho ' .I I 3___ t`-`\" •�'r \ �.�% LOT 2 SO AC. PARCEL A WETLAND ?aY\ a Lot 2 BUILDING SIT£ 51,459 5< 'BUFFER IMPACT - 5,46D SF II %�' PARCEL A _ i t r PARKING SPACE REQUIRED. / ■ . . (35 SPACESAOOO SF) X (5N,459 Si) = 191 SPACES OWNER: DRIM PARKING SPACES PROYIDEO: r91 PROPOSED (INCLUDING s L 124 Technology Park Way, LLC HMocAPPEO SPACES AND 9 (INCLUDINGSPACES FOR FUEL EFFICIENT 30 Community Drive Suite 4 WHINES) (SAX 191 SPACEERNO p-/INHa/S) PL1O ARA I NO DISTURBANCE \ I �____,��- South Burlington, VT 05403 LOT COVERAGE.' Phone: (802)860-1691 rreoPosm. Y, Fax: (802)960-1695 BUILDING 14153 SF - 8.33S ALL R/'ROWIEWTS %,9]i Y N.Sx FRONT YARD, s225 Ss = 16.32x / a, Innw' .' $. '%sNzq _ DESIGN BUILDER: ReArch Company 6a650 SF OF PARKING LOT ' I I II , . 30 Community Drive Suite 8 6.347 SF OF ISLANDS IN PARKING LOT i 1�.729.,•lD�\ PARCEL 1� South Burlington, VT 05403 wC'S 7 MCOR➢ORAIF \ PLAN - sg PLAN er Y arouv � ]�� R wCul II' �. I i Phone:(802)863-8727 RWA� REGUEZ7 S -PLANTING PLAN - SEE PLAN BY SE GROUP - 1i OELIIEAko ! Fax: (802)863-8734 aASS -CONNECTION DEURS UPON APPLICATION TO 'ERAND I - ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture Umincs THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UNOFRGROUND URLITRS ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXWAR WAY 5224 Shelburne Rd. ONLY AND HAW NOT BEEN INOI PENOENRY WRFIED BY THE OWNER OR PIT ENGINEER. / I l CONTRACTOR 91ALL DETERMINi ATE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXTSIINC UTILITIES BEFORE _ REFER TO DETAIL 7 III /-.vaol",: Shelburne, VT 05482 CCWWENONG NOW. MIN ACRI f S TO BE FILLY RESPON9BIL FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES SHEET 7 FOR GRADES IN T IElt9a'1 AIE I ; VARCH YIG IT BE OCCA9ONED NY THE CONTRACTORS FAIUtE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND SERVICE AREA -' ' I '• I I ' Phone:(802)985-5595 , PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDIRGROUND UTRIDES IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILIi _ --` ; 1 i, 6 �A T `. Fax: (802)985-5565 TO CONTACT 'OIG SAFE* AT 1- 800-225-/977 TO LOCATE ANY UNDERGROUND UWRFS /� \ - o I ! I I I - ' -v i F ' BEFORE EXCAVATION BEGINS THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOnFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY �� - ANY DISCREPANCY H/MFLN UIx111E5 AS 910NN A1O AS FOUND. N — - y' �7� - - �,I Y I o- `•?Sy y'/., / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: _ Y / '� "+fe, \ /• gyp; % % Goldstein -Milano LLC �.�% 2 T , 125 Main Street �SP22AA'UTILITY PLAN' FOR l / /'�/ 1 I �> . svmEn naysaR • I - Reading,MA 01867 UTILITY qEN RFICA 11I1N AND LAYOUT. ) /ECI'al6 AREA 1 I '�J'/��1 I I 1 ' \ I EXS ONG 20• (( 16.5' 9a gyp\ 1 ; 1 l.�•0 1 1 - I I EASEYEr�TO � Phone:(781)670-9990 j I (TBACK -� I ; ,` V 1 I ' �) j (� s auma+cTON.__ ,<' Fax: (781)670-9939 cr.gt yule I (TYP.) wr s , . - `,: i `- I I ENE, OF I ¢ _ _..-_ ppracEPAp ,• _ :, ; '�\` 1 CONo�IE I - ' CIVIL ENGINEER: Feet1-330.50 Trudell Consulting Engineers 30 O 30 60 90 120 I uWr N�eIW ' _ LOT I WETIND BUFFER\ `� I 478 Blair Park Road I I PA• IMPACT = 18,361 SF I� ,T' V TP.O BOX 306 \ P. 4,�, 11lE r ' y■ `\ I halo Williston, VT 05495 I u' REAR ■\ .' . \\ I rAAEar tsa •A- Phone:(802)879-6331 SE1eAM ,,,+` - 7BrL x "MaEs 0W.S r 1 1 I Fax: (802)879-0060 I ' " I 1 i AWASAW sNRAQ '�'�''� Q'I_ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: u•r a l ' .... y' .� i I aA A _ I (� /: / SE Group saa P FrDaE aw • I g -- ) / 131 Church Street 1QElr A AMR , I \ . OOrICIEIE I . � � 3,1F `��. � i 1 e I i - - \I Burlington, VT 05401 w 1 - ORA�1C IiF 1 /I —' !' I - T ' s�/' , ' 3' �/-•-'i'- --. _`. -_---- Fax(802)8652440 2-0096 STARS I , 1 1 -- - I ' 1 - ONCE EASEMENT FOR -I _ { DEUCA IFD TO I , { an OF so LTfl�Iif • / I >, / ' / / 1 1 - MECHANICAL ENGINEER: , / I/ -- 1 1 1 I I - EwsXONI TO c, .c New England Air Systems Inc. ' I L Ns• snlrrE owE - m P. Nr __ �I P.O. Box 525 Z I t e 43 Krupp Drive I PROP06iD 3 STORY j V Williston VT 05495 OFFICE BULDWG I I r ;< 33s eA rk ' < !• (�)/� 120lrile�Au ue Phone:(802)864-3800 . - FfE 343.0 �-- I 17 / ;F. / \ \ I I , -• aN4." .:., . - "".. , • I ,�j t � 1>� P. 1� Fax' (802)864 3904 r w , ` 5 25• EASEMENT r0 - - \ •\ � / -- ; .T. T. ul _ -.�- I � ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: 1 •o " � �.' . „m, PE3mA ,i' A l 1 Omegas Electric ', t ; I I„�,.II . ■ s oRm C1,FB i'j = I Y II 1 25 Omega Drive MrYP - Williston, VT 05495 .� RANK PIWme: 802 2-0517 Fax: (802)862-4349 I ' -- .+« I a ) I FIRE PROTECTION: I /, AGTEESSBL SPIRE �--- Ix { •S I ; C r'_ I IYP 66 •S� North Count Fire Protection AYE P.O. Box 2004 - - ' a @RE ' SFE� cDlOnester, yr osaas - >u� {, _ _ \ one:(602)876-s a r I I - - , Ph 594 1 I _ �t .. ; ( Sr�Ts IFZ b r3 a •. • ` / _ yBaj�F��, _ R i Fax: (802)878-2186 PROP06EB SPOTFUEL rntaEa l LOTS Tar i v 1 (rwrAx) toFcs • - --- - 1 1 I D PROPOSED 5• 1 2 9a1 --1 r TIP I ' I I ' S I i_ DATE: 09/07/2tX)7 e„ 54 J u YaI f .- FxAOE SEEM" •t v SCALE:_ 1•=30' 1 ' / NITRO / 9Wno ; ' a• ; I cArv/to i i REVISIONS \ NO. Dote i I / R --+- - -- — -- ----- — -- — — -- I I 2 9oN . R. b AP,r 10-02-07 -- - C Y; — i aT-ro-6a .. 9 I «, a U a1P rr I' I' I' '� i I . S - ' Y ; I 1. 43 IAeoe.� lo--is-06 I I._ tt S'OE1rAur (LY DOUX /W cAO, (SEF SHEET SP1w 1ri `L1 r i } '" it SAY -; \1 IT- aAA9ED (aGVEl BAY FOR S� CAT EAFMCADON ArMET0 COND1"Voup I I 1J�-��_ `� - I r 1 /OE,L °/FFBun11,160 r .aai: i I 1 , �t - I I _ / / n d SEWER 20' E NEREASE7E71T T ' i i I 1 ( ) \ --- _` _ SP/I� L 0 1 / �J rr 10A.1, PAP &is-w- south m lington PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP-q,� - (oftice use o ly) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW e Administrative o Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): 124 Technology Park Way, LLC 55 Community Drive, Suite 40Z South Burlington, VT 05403 802-860-1691 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): v 812 p 269 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): same as Owner 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) attn: Abby Dery 478 Blair Park Road, Williston, VT 05495 (802) 879-6331 x 107 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: abby.dery@tcevt.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 124 Technology Park Way 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 1713-00124 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com I 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Reduce number of permitted PM Peak Hour vehicle trips from 140 trips to 82 trips b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): 54,459 sq. ft. commercial office building c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): no change in use d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 54,459 sq. ft. building e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): no change f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): not applicable g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): no change h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE a. Building: Total Parcel Size: 217,947 Existing 8.3 % / Proposed 8•3 % / l Sq. Ft. 18,153 sq. ft. 18,153 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 44.5 % / 96,971 sq. ft. Proposed 44.5 % / 96,971 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing 16.3 % / 4,232 sq. ft. Proposed 16.3 % / 4.232 sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) NIA * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ no change b. Landscaping: $ no change c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): no change 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 82 trips 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday through Friday 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: no construction 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)' regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City atttwhe�_time of/submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. Administrative site plan applications require three (3 regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the informatio uested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowled SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OF PROPERTY —OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: T4 REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board L'1 Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: CI Comp The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist, Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 io 40, VERMONT )i State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation L Agency of Natural Resources Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED io V.S.A. Chapter 64, Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, Effective September 29, 2007 Chapter 21, Water Supply Rules, Effective December 1, 2010 Landowner(s): Technology Park Campus, LLC Permit Number: WW-4-4411 c/o John Illick PIN: EJ96-o138.04 55 Community Drive, Suite 402 South Burlington VT 05403 This permit affects property identified as Town Tax Parcel ID # South Burlington: 0436-o0030.03 referenced in a deed recorded in Book 898 Page(s) 210 of the Land Records in South Burlington, Vermont. This project, consisting of the proposed construction of a 54, 459 square foot office building with two hundred employees on Lot #3 of Technology Park, and construction of water and wastewater services, served by municipal water supply services and municipal wastewater disposal services located on 88 Technology Park Way in South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. 1.GENERAL 1.1 The project shall be completed as shown on the following plans and/or documents prepared by Abigail Dery, P.E. of Trudell Consulting Engineers, with the stamped plans listed as follows: Sheet Number Title Plan Date Plan Revision Date C2-01 Overall Site Plan 10/30/2014 3/23/2015 C2-02 Site Plan 10/30/2014 3/23/2015 C8-oi Sewer & Water Details 10/30/2014 3/23/2015 Sheet 1 of 4 Subdivision Plat 10/03/2007 7/14/2014 Sheet 3 of 4 j Easement Plat 10/03/2007 7/14/2014 1.2 This permit does not relieve the landowner from obtaining all other approvals and permits PRIOR to construction including, but not limited to, those that may be required from the Act 25o District Environmental Commission; the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division; the Watershed Management Division; the Division of Fire Safety; the Vermont Department of Health; the Family Services Division; other State departments; or local officials. 1.3 The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the landowner and all assigns and successors in interest. The landowner shall record and index this permit in the South Burlington Land Records within thirty, (3o) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. 1.4 The landowner shall record and index all required installation certifications and other documents that are required to be filed under these Rules or under a specific permit condition. in the South Burlington Land Records and ensure that copies of all certifications are sent to the Secretary. 1.5 No permit issued by the Secretary shall be valid for a substantially completed potable water supply and wastewater system until the Secretary receives a signed and dated certification from a Vermont Licensed Designer (or where allowed, the installer) that states: "I hereby certify that, in the exercise of my. reasonable professional judgment, the installation -related information submitted is true and correct and the potable water supply and wastewater system were installed in accordance with the permitted design and all the permit conditions, were inspected, were properly tested, and have successfully met those performance tests". Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury Wastewater System and Potable Wate7 ply Permit Page 2 of 3 or which otherwise satisfies the requirements of §1-3o8 and §i-9ii of the referenced rules. All.conditions set forth in Permit Number WW-4-3040 shall remain in effect except as amended or modified herein. This project is approved for the construction of a 54, 459 square foot office building with two hundred employees on Lot #3 (3.98 acres) of Technology Park -and the construction of municipal water and sewer services. 1.7 Construction of additional nonexempt buildings, including commercial and residential buildings, is not allowed without prior review and approval by the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. No construction is allowed that will cause non-compliance with an existing permit. 1.8 Each purchaser of any portion of the project shall be shown a copy of the Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit and the stamped plan(s), if applicable, prior to conveyance of any portion of the project to that purchaser. 1.9 By acceptance of this permit, the landowner agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the properly covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations, and permit conditions. 1.10 Any person aggrieved by this permit may appeal to the Environmental Court within 3o days of the date of issuance of this permit in accordance with io V.S.A. Chapter 22o and the Vermont Rules of Environmental Court Proceedings. 2.WATER SUPPLY 2.1 The components of the potable water supply herein approved shall be routinely and reliably inspected during construction by a Vermont Licensed Designer (or where allowed, the installer) who shall, upon completion and prior to occupancy of the associated building, report in writing to the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division that the installation was accomplished in accordance with the referenced plans and permit conditions, as specifically directed in Condition #1.5 herein. 2.2 This project is approved for connection to the water supply system owned by the City of South Burlington (VToo05092) for a maximum of 2700 gallons of water per day. 2.3 The landowner shall install and maintain backflow prevention devices that conform to Vermont Department of Public Safety standards and NFPA 13 for any connection of a sprinkler fire suppression system to a public drinking water system. 2.4 This permit is based, in part, on a municipal approval for connection to their water distribution system. If the municipal approval expires, this permit shall be invalid unless the municipality renews its approval. If the municipality approval expires, a new permit must be issued for the project. An updated application form and an application fee will be required for the project. A new municipal approval letter shall be required. The rules in effect at the time of the filing of the application for a new permit will be applied to the project. 3.WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 3.1 The components of the sanitary wastewater system herein approved shall be routinely and reliably inspected during construction by a Vermont Licensed Designer (or where allowed, the installer) who shall, upon completion and prior to occupancy of the associated building, report in writing to the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division that the installation was accomplished in accordance with the referenced plans and permit conditions, as specifically directed in Condition #1.5 herein. 3.2 This project is approved for connection to the City of South Burlington wastewater treatment facility as depicted on the plan(s) stamped by the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division. The project is approved for a maximum of 2400 gallons of wastewater per day. Wastewater System and Potable Water �ly Permit WWt4-44u Page 3 Of 3.3 This permit is based, in part, on a municipal approval for connection to their wastewater treatment facility. If the municipal approval expires, this permit shall be invalid unless the municipality renews its approval. If the municipality approval expires, a new permit must be issued for the project. An updated application form and an application fee will be required for the project. A new municipal approval letter shall be required if the project is served by the municipal wastewater collection system. The rules in effect at the time of the filing of the application for a new permit will be applied to the project. David K. Mears, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By W Dated March 26, 2015 Jes k ne Wyman, Reg nal Engineer Essex Regional Office Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division cc South Burlington Planning Commission Abigail Dery/Trudell Consulting Engineers Act 25o District Environmental Commission-4Co190-1 Department of Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety 01 30 COMMUNITY DRIVE Traffic Calculations USE SQ. FOOTAGE General Office 131,000 sq. ft. Warehouse 10,000 sq. ft. Light Manufacturing 81,000 sq. ft. Indoor Recreation 10,000 sq. ft. Short Order Restaurant 2000 sq. ft. Research & Testing 41,000 sq. ft. *No trips generated, not used 55 Community Drive 4/18/07 RJ B LUC VTFS (LUC #710) #150) 225.53 10.58 (LUC r<- (LUC #110) 79.38 � (LUC #492) 40.5 (LUC #933) 87.74 (LUC #110) 48.18 404.17 159.5 563.67 F:\USERS\Planning & Zoning\Development Review Board\Findings_Decisions\2007\Tech Park\traffic_calc.xls ray From: Jeremy Matosky <Jeremy@trudellconsulting.com> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 11:50 AM To: ray Cc: Jennifer Desautels, P.E.; Abby Lisius; Tim McKenzie; John Illick; Mark G. Hall; Karen Pettersen Subject: Technology Park Hi Ray - The other day when we met and discussed traffic and trip generation for Technology Park you indicated Lot 8A has exceeded the previously approved 647 PM peak hour trips by a large margin. You provided us with your trip generation calculations which indicated the ITE PM Peak trips ends for Lot 8A were 867 VTE's. We both agreed this would be reduced by 88 trips since short order restaurant was all internal captured trips for the cafeteria, which brought the your estimated ITE PM Trips down to 778. Abby re -checked the calculations using the latest ITE Trip Generation Manual and found that the ITE trips for Lot 8A should only be 399 VTE's not 778. Her calculations are provided below. We agreed with your numbers except for LUC 110, you must have made a mistake in calculating the formula. Since the fitted equations for LUC #110 yields a negative (due to small independent variable) the average rate should be used instead of the fitted curve. This made a significant difference in the overall totals. Lot 8A per ITE Trip Generation LUC Use SF Fitted Curve Equation Aver a a Rate 710 Office 131,000 T = 1.12 X + 78.91 226 1.49 196 150 Warehouse 10,000 Ln T = 0.79 Ln X + 0.54 11 0.47 5 110* Light Manufacturing 81,000 T = 1.43 X-163.42 -47.59 0.98 80 492* Health/Fitness Club 10,000 no a uation n/a 1 4.05 41 933 Short Order Rest. 2,000 Assumed all internal capture trips 110* Research & Testing 41,000 T = 1.43 X-163.42 1 -104.79 0.98 41 Total 1275,000 TOTAL 399 *fitted curve yields negative trips therefore use avg. rate Our THEORETICAL numbers above also compares very well with our current volume tube counts for Technology Park which yields an ACTUAL weekday average PM peak of 344 trips. I trust you will agree that we are still well under the previously allocated 647 trips. From this point forward we will make sure we use the fitted equations for all ITE projected traffic as outlined in the SBLDR. We will also be working on calculating some new total trip numbers for the subdivision to create a more realistic allocation to work from and updating our 2006 overall traffic study. One other item for clarification, you indicated traffic impact fees are calculated based on a formula of FEES = ITE PM Peak Hour VTE x $144.56 — credits for paid tax (before) — credits for future tax (after). Can you confirm for me that roadway improvements made by the applicant would also be credited against any traffic impact fees? I believe this was the case on other projects in SB we have worked on. Regards, Jeremy M. Matosky, P.E., CPESC Project Manager / President Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 p (802) 879-6331 f (802) 879-0060 visit us on the web at www.trudel]consulting.com Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The City of South Burlington Stormwater Superintendent reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memo dated August 27, 2007. The applicant has replied to the Stormwater Superintendent and has provided answers to the questions previously outlined. Furthermore, the Board understands that the project will require review by the appropriate State stormwater authorities. The Board is not concerned about the stormwater treatment aspects of the plan but recommends that the applicant continue to work with the South Burlington Stormwater Superintendent as work progresses. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. The applicant is proposing to access the new building via a 26' wide private access road that connects to the eastern leg of Community Drive. This road will be accompanied to the south by a five (5) foot wide concrete sidewalk. The private road shall remain private. Legal documents (in the form of a private road agreement) shall be submitted, reviewed, and recorded to ensure that this is the case. At this time, the Board does not have any concerns regarding the circulation or traffic management. The proposed 54,459 square feet of general office space is estimated to generate 139.8 PM peak hour vehicle trip ends. The property was previously granted 647 trip ends. 404.17 vehicle trip ends are allocated to the building at 30 Community Drive. 159.5 vehicle trip ends are allocated to the building at 55 Community Drive, for a total of 703.47 vehicle trip ends. Therefore, the proposed building will exceed the permitted number of vehicle trip ends by 56.47 vehicle trip ends. The Board has no concerns at this time regarding the total number of trip ends, nor does the Board feel that a new traffic study is required. However, the applicant shall pay for the increased trip ends, minus any credits as determined by the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The plans that the applicant submitted depict a significant amount of wetlands on the subject property. The applicant is proposing to encroach into a delineated Class II wetland buffer. The applicant has submitted a Conditional Use Determination which was issued from the State in 2003 and subsequently re -approved several times, most recently for the period from March 26, 2006 to April 12, 2009, for a previously proposed building. The applicant has stated that the degree of wetland and buffer impact is no greater than was originally granted in the CUD. The applicant has relocated the dumpster facility out of the wetland buffer, and is proposing significant vegetative screening to delineate the wetland buffer. The Board is pleased with the proposed plan and finds that this criterion is being met to the best ability of the applicant. -3— 1 #S P-07-67 the grading plan should meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The South Burlington Stormwater Superintendent shall visit the site as construction progresses to ensure compliance with this criterion. 10. The applicant shall submit a private road agreement which shall ensure that the proposed private road remains private. This document shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records prior to permit issuance. 11. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the proposed building will generate a total of 139.8 vtes but only has to pay on 56.47 vtes. 12. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications should be underground. 13. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall post a $50,500 landscaping bond. This bond shall remain in full effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of survival. 14. Pursuant to Section 12.02(E)(2) of the Land Development Regulations, the Development Review Board allows encroachment into a Class II wetland and wetland buffer. 15. The Board allows parking to be placed in the front of the building as shown on the plan due to the power line location in the front and the applicant's overall proposal to have a campus style arrangement for future buildings. 16. Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting features. Any change to approved lights shall require approval of the Administrative Officer prior to installation. 17. The applicant shall complete the recreation path along Kimball Avenue within six (6) months after the date of the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the building. 18. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 17.04 of the Land Development Regulations or this approval is null and void. 19. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to the use of the new building. 20. Any change to the site plan shall require approval of the South Burlington Development Review Board or the Administrative Officer. #SP-07-08 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING TECHNOLOGY PARK ASSOCIATES, INC. — 30 COMMUNITY DRIVE SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-07-08 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Technology Park Associates, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting site plan approval to amend a previously approved site plan for a 275,000 sq. ft. commercial, and industrial building consisting of 131,000 sq. ft. of general office, 10,000 sq. ft. of warehouse use, 81,000 sq. ft. light manufacturing use, 10,000 sq. ft. indoor recreation use, 2,000 sq. ft. retail food establishment use, and 41,000 sq. ft. research and testing laboratory use, 30 Community Drive. The amendment consists of changing the use of 2,000 sq. ft. of retail food establishment use to 2,000 sq. ft. of short-order restaurant (accessory) use, 30 Community Drive. Based on the document file for this application, the Administrative Officer finds, concludes, and decides as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT This project consists of site plan approval to amend a previously approved site plan for a 275,000 sq. ft. commercial and industrial building consisting of 31,000 sq. ft. of general office, 10,000 sq. ft. of warehouse use, 81,000 sq. ft. light manufacturing use, 10,000 sq. ft. indoor recreation use, 2,000 sq. ft. retail food establishment use, and 41,000 sq. ft. research and testing laboratory use. The amendment consists of changing the use of 2,000 sq. ft. of retail food establishment use to 2,000 sq. ft. of short-order restaurant (accessory) use, 30 Community Drive. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is Technology Park Partners et al 3. The subject property is located in the Mixed Industrial & Commercial (Mixed IC) Zoning District. 4. The application was received on February 12, 2007. 5. The plan submitted is entitled, "Technology Park Partners Technology Park 30 Community Drive South Burlington, Vt.", prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers dated 5/15/06 with a last revised date of 01/10/07. DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS 7. Dimensional requirements are not being affected by this application. 8. Setback requirements are being met. -1- #SP-07-08 Traffic 17. The building has an existing traffic budget of 647 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. The current and proposed uses generate 366.51 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. The current and proposed uses are not exceeding the existing traffic budget. (a) The relationship of the proposed development to goals and objects set forth in the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. 18. The Comprehensive Plan states that the City should encourage development while protecting natural resources and promoting a healthy and safe environment. The proposed project is in keeping with the recommended actions of the Comprehensive Plan. (b)The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. 19. The building is existing. The proposal is in keeping with this requirement. (c) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. 20. Parking is located on the sides and rear of the building. All parking is existing with no additional parking proposed. 21. Section 13.01 of the Land Development Regulations requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities be provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. It has already been noted that a multiple number of bicycle racks are shown on the plan. (d) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. 22. The building is existing and no changes are proposed. (e) Newly installed utility service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. 23. The plans do not indicate changes in utility service. (0 The combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to cerate attractive transitions between buildings or different architectural styles shall be encouraged. -3- (000�7 / I #S P-06-31 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations requires parking facilities to be curbed and landscaped with appropriate trees, shrubs, and other plants including ground covers. The City Arborist has issued comments in a memo dated June 13, 2006. The applicant has reviewed these comments and made the requested changes. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(4) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas must be shown on the plans. The plans depict adequate show snow storage areas for the subject property. Landscaping budget requirements are to be determined pursuant to Section 13.06(G)(2) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Based on the submitted building cost, the minimum landscaping budget shall be $45,620. The landscape budget presented by the applicant exceeds the minimum required. Lighting Pursuant to Appendix A.9 of the Land Development Regulations, luminaries shall not be placed more than 30' above ground level and the maximum illumination at ground level shall not exceed an average of three (3) foot candles. Pursuant to Appendix A.10(b) of the Land Development Regulations, indirect glare produced by illumination at ground level shall not exceed 0.3 foot candles maximum, and an average of 0.1 foot candles average. All lighting shall be shielded and downcast. The lighting plan submitted by the applicant meets the criterion included above. Traffic This subdivision has an existing traffic budget of 647 vehicle trip ends. The existing building at 30 Community Drive is estimated to generate 195 vte's and this proposed office building is estimated to generate 159.5 vte's for a total of 354.5 vtes which is well within the existing budget. Access Access to this property is proposed via three 24 foot wide curb cuts. The southerly most curb cut accesses the loading dock area and the other two curb cuts serve the parking lot. Due to the unique lot configuration, the Board supports the approval of these curb cuts. Fire Safety The South Burlington Fire Chief reviewed the plans and provided comments in a letter dated June 14, 2006. Other The Director of South Burlington Public Works has provided comments in a memo dated June 16, 2006. The applicant shall adhere to these stipulations. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING BURLINGTON FITNESS, INC. — 30 COMMUNITY DRIVE SITE PLAN #SP-05-45 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Burlington Fitness Inc. d/b/a Planet Fitness, hereinafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking to amend a previously approved site plan for a 275,000 sq. ft. commercial, and industrial building consisting of 120,464 sq. ft. of general office use, 35,600 sq. ft. warehouse use, and 118,936 sq. ft. of light manufacturing use. The amendment consists of converting 10,000 sq. ft. of light manufacturing use to indoor recreation use, 30 Community Drive. Based on the plans and supporting material contained in the document file for,this application, the Administrative Officer finds, concludes, and decides as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. This project consists of amending a previously approved site plan for a 275,000 sq. ft. commercial, and industrial building consisting of 120,464 sq. ft. of general office use, 35,600 sq. ft. warehouse use, and 118,936 sq. ft. of light manufacturing use. The amendment consists of converting 10,000 sq. ft. of light manufacturing use to indoor recreation use, 30 Community Drive. 2. The owners of record of the subject property are Technology Park Assocaites Inc., Axinn Vermont, Inc. & PMF Energy, Inc. 3. The subject property is located in the Mixed Industrial and Commercial (IC) Zoning District. ' 4. The application was received on September 21, 2005. 5. The plan submitted is entitled, "ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey Technology Park Assoc., Et Al Lot 8A Community Drive South Burlington, Vt", prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc., dated 12/1/97. DIMENSION REQ UIREMENTS 6. There are no changes to coverages associated with this project. 7. The setback requirements are being met. -1- Traffic 17. The 8/6/96 Planning Commission decision for the subdivision of Technology Park allocated 647 vehicle trip ends (vte's) for all the lots in this park. Institute of Traffic Engineers Manual (ITE) estimates that the existing uses generate 288.22 vte's during the p.m. peak hour and the proposed and exisiting uses to generate 320.92 vte's, for a 32.7 vte increase. (a) The relationship of the proposed development to goals and objects set forth in the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. 18. The Comprehensive Plan states that the City should encourage development while protecting natural resources and promoting a healthy and safe environment. The proposed project is in keeping with the recommended actions of the Comprehensive Plan. (b)The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. 19. The building is existing and no changes are proposed. (c) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. 20. Most of the parking is located on the sides. All parking is existing with no additional parking proposed. 21. Section 13.01 of the Land Development Regulations requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities be provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is shown on the plan. (d) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. 22. The building is existing and no changes are proposed. (e) Newly installed utility service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. 23. The plans do not indicate changes in utility service. - 3 - CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING TECHNOLOGY PARK ASSOCIATES, INC. — 30 COMMUNITY DRIVE SITE PLAN #SP-06-27 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Technology Park Associates, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting site plan approval to amend a previously approved site plan for a 275,000 sq. ft. commercial, and industrial building consisting of 120,464 sq. ft. of general office use, 35,600 sq. ft. warehouse use, 108,936 sq. ft. of light manufacturing use, and 10,000 sq. ft. of indoor recreation use . The amendment consists of: 1) adding an environmental testing laboratory use, 2) adding retail food establishment use, 3) adding square footage to general office use, for a total of 131,000 sq. ft. of general office, 10,000 sq. ft. of warehouse use, 81,000 sq. ft. light manufacturing use, 10,000 sq. ft. indoor recreation use, 2,000 sq. ft. retail food establishment use, and 41,000 sq. ft. research and testing laboratory use, 30 Community Drive. Based on the document file for this application, the Administrative Officer finds, concludes, and decides as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT This project consists of site plan approval to amend a previously approved site plan for a 275,000 sq. ft. commercial and industrial building consisting of 120,464 sq. ft. of general office use, 35,600 sq. ft. warehouse use, 108,936 sq. ft. of light manufacturing use, and 10,000 sq. ft. of indoor recreation use. The amendment consists of: 1) adding an environmental testing laboratory use, 2) adding retail food establishment use, 3) adding square footage to general office use, for a total of 131,000 sq. ft. of general office, 10,000 sq. ft. of warehouse use, 81,000 sq. ft. light manufacturing use, 10,000 sq. ft. indoor recreation use, 2,000 sq. ft. retail food establishment use, and 41,000 sq. ft. research and testing laboratory use, 30 Community Drive. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is Technology Park Partners et al 3. The subject property is located in the Mixed Industrial & Commercial (Mixed IC) Zoning District. 4. The application was received on May 9, 2006. 5. The plan submitted is entitled, "Severen Trent Laboratory Technology Park 30 Community Drive South Burlington, VT.", prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers and dated 5/15/06. DIMENSION REQUIREMENTS 6. There are no changes to coverages associated with this project. -1- Traffic 16. The building has an existing traffic budget of 647 vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. The proposed change in use will not exceed the budget. (a) The relationship of the proposed development to goals and objects set forth in the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. 17. The Comprehensive Plan states that the City should encourage development while protecting natural resources and promoting a healthy and safe environment. The proposed project is in keeping with the recommended actions of the Comprehensive Plan. (b)The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. 18. The building is existing. The proposal is in keeping with this requirement. (c) Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. 19. Parking is located on the side and rear of the existing building. All parking is existing with no additional parking proposed. 20. Section 13.01 of the Land Development Regulations requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities be provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. It has already been noted that a multiple number of bicycle racks are shown on the plan. (d) Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. 21. The building is existing and no changes are proposed. (e) Newly installed utility service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. 22. The plans do not indicate changes in utility service. (t) The combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to cerate attractive transitions between buildings or different architectural styles shall be encouraged. -3- 30 COMMUNITY DRIVE 9/13/07 Traffic Calculations RJB USE SQ. FOOTAGE LUC VTE'S General Office 131,000 sq. ft. (LUC #710) 225.53 Warehouse 10,000 sq. ft. (LUC #150) 10.58 Light Manufacturing 81,000 sq. ft. (LUC #110) 279.25 Indoor Recreation 10,000 sq. ft. (LUC #492) 40.5 Short Order Restaurant 2000 sq. ft. (LUC #933) 87.74 Research & Testing 41,000 sq. ft. (LUC #110) 222.05 865.65 southb-i.l.,,,,,"k"i,�,,",.""."",.,�",,,,'I PLANNING & ZONING - November 23, 2011 Re: #SP-11-46 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning Permit must be obtained within six (66) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincer , Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7010 0290 0000 2215 3859 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT OS403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com E southburlinuton PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number Sp - (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ❑ Administrative (Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): 1z�4Apt©&1-1 In LLB'. t4 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): _ C- rim 6W N UIZ-- 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. include name, address, phone & fax #): 1 2-t! vt el, �._. Wv Cif=LC- w�c it'st7M,y j^oS `t`i PrwE 67g-6�,"3i i-I b 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: )r"ol,��~}✓uActkcyo-,-o1-hL,, ,�tS�^'� 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: (2N T E1 i N V)152U6 4 W 1I 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): l7(3-DC71Z`i 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): W ►+1 z. U t_AVD u Ff f-12_ b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): � 0vtr-7_ C(SW wt t ac—I M7— nFTIC_E 13U 1 Lut VI fi c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): 61p c.4fi"Cxp_ 31A kp—VIdUS d. Total buildin square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 0 C_ t e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): /Vo f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): A%F- g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): A r- d Ibd 6g; h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): z Site Plan Application Form Rev. 12-2010 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 7J1.9J7 Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing 913 % Proposed 63 % / / , IS�j sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing Ws % / T6,6771 sq. ft. Proposed SVy. S % / 96 y -71 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing Ilk, 3 % / 1-Z. L sq. ft. Proposed /6.3 % 1 % Z ",1� L--sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 2_4rr_> * Guxg-ei&T Cuv0X-V1%-E Ls h bm C 6P 3-10L0 * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): b. Landscaping: c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC $__ ,%U Ckfr")Cr� a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): dO Ctt 0111 r7F-- _ 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: dt, CtyH- -vi6--r. 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: / o -rHe 146E 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: F' rt L ZD i 1 14. OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES' (this shall be provided on a separate attached sheet and on pre -stamped and pre - addressed envelopes. The city will add the return address). 5F-1~ rl� TT AC_tw-b Not required for Administrative Site Plan Applications 3 Site Plan Application Form Rev 12-2010 1 15. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)2 regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. -4 aegon I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OWNER \ 1 PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: to oM REVIEW AUTHORITY: LJ Development Review Board ❑ Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: L�' Complete U In o plet - f lq�N mistrative icer k date The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 2 Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 TTRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) October 3, 2011 City of South Burlington — Planning & Zoning Attn: Ray Belair 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Technology Paris Lot 2 —124 Technology Park Way Dear Ray: tel: 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudeliconsulting.com This request involves replacing existing asphalt with a 10 & by 21 ft. concrete pad for the dumpsters and extending the existing fence screening to enclose the dumpsters and the proposed emergency generator. The new fence posts will be installed in sleeves to make the fence removable if access to the chiller or generator is necessary by vehicle. Enclosed are a site plan application and set of plans for an amendment to the Lot 2 site plan at Technology Park. The applicant is proposing to adjust the previously approved screened dur apster area to allow for the placement of a generator. At the time of the original site plan approval the building tenant and function was unknown, but now we know the tenant, being Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (GMCR) and we know that the dumpsters will be used for standard office by- products. GMCR maintains a corporate policy that all office waste and recycling receptacles shall be controlled and covered at all times at all sites, which will be strictly adhered too at this location. The proposed new location ofthe dumpsters places the office waste receptacle in a position that straddles the wetland buffer and encroaches on the buffer by +/- I I feet. Furthemrore, this proposal does not alter the curbing, grading or current handling of the stormwater runoff from this location, which is collected in an adjacent catch basin and conveyed to the stormwater management system,. Nor does this proposal constitute any further imperious surface impacts to buffers or wetlands. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the enclosed materials. I can be reached at (802) 879-6331 x18. Very truly yours, ELL C NSULTIN GINEBM (T 4 Debra A Bell Senior Project Manager Enct site plan application, sheet SP 1 & L I A $288 application fee oc. Joseph Ardnitects 10-3-1 Mot2 subrnittalCowr P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Civil Engineering, Surveying, Land Planning, Water and Wastewater, Landscape Architecture. Roadway Design, Permitting i 124 Technology Way, LLC (Technology Park Lot 2) Abutters List Grand List 110 KIMBALL AVE 120 KIMBALL AVE Mailing Addresses 110 KIMBALLAVE 12o KIMBALL AVE 0980-00110 0980-00120 110 KIMBALL LLC 120 KIMBALL CORPORATION 110 KIMBALL LLC 120 KIMBALL CORPORATION P O BOX 4120 BURLINGTON VT P O BOX 4120 BURLINGTON VT 600-188- 16612 600-188- 11958 054( 412( 054( 412( Agenda #3 southburlingt_i, PLANNING & ZONING MEMORANDUM TO: South Burlington Develop t Review Board FROM: Cathyann LaRose, AIC ' RE: Site plan application #SP-11-46 DATE: November 8, 2011 124 Technology Park Way, LLC is seeking site plan approval to amend a previously approved plan for a 54,459 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of adding an emergency generator. The request involves replacing existing asphalt with a 10' x 21' concrete pad for the dumpsters and extending the existing fence screening to enclose the dumpsters and the proposed generator. The applicant has stated that the new fence posts will be installed in sleeves to make the fence removable if access is necessary by vehicle. The applicant has also stated that there are no changes to the curbing, grading, or current handling of the stormwater runoff. There are no additional impervious surface impacts to the wetlands or wetland buffers. Staff recommends approval of the application. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT OS403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.corn i PURPOSE OF PLAN THE PLAIT INTENT IS To RELOCATE DUMP57ER PAD, FENCE AND ADD EMERGENCY GENERATOR. r ®� Y 001p67 � LOG/r01t i LOT 14 i LOT 6 C—p1d. Scab ' Feet I 30 4'' 30 QO 90 120 I arnaE flrerraea_. Kcom4aff r ,r r1sa+® eoron,cr LaaeAtoe VAULT TRANSFORMER W) /� 3 STORY OFFICE BUII.DWG F.F.E. NaO 342.34 J ❑ SCN40 PVC CONDUITS (CMP) (i)-4- SCHO PVC (tERIZOT) (1)-4- SCH 40 PVC (TELET) (0-4' SCH 40 PVC (SPARE) (1)-4' SCH 40 PVC (LEVEL J) h34O74s- VAULT 3040 na6alr cr�s vatf"• .... W-3 1-34043 I OUT-34a34 TET.ECO/NU16CAnWS J/ CCNDUITS STUSSM-UP FNRPONT� (2) 4' PVC EACH; FUTURE VAULT PEDESTAL/JUNCnO4 Box LOCATIONS UNDER DRAIN CLEANOUT; NO WTNESS 0 ` rt k7rn 4 too' aw j 2 y 4-dMb t i f•, JSAM 4-d4.72 r ;-Maw! J3l.72 333f1 ! ' STOIE IIEEW . r 1 Tw%M 6" 333.e44 (J-Y o"WEs) f t -afar a M ,7 ''. 11 . �-_� - ' TUT ---1 f W�MJte[ r r ♦ �. r1; I I I; t:II 4 faE314 10cc X M ! i t li DUN LL Mr t r-340+3NL12 yyl 1 �• L[ TO un YN-33o !S JJ6M Aoasrfo eastN I "- '`ae,y3Ja.ost DMInorrp w ar ar Otf[ LAM 1xmEr 3 P f-a5A& a7.422 I —1 ♦` \ I�SrORMWATER % `® Cr-Bd/d46:T4Y4PE a II ® t ' 1 BASIN / I-dd4rT 3A 3349* r 3 1- 3.31.26t 12• d t - _ 1-JJ32T I' r-2dirM JJZee ' ,. I EN-ddk76 334.69 DRAINAGE' IDUT-da*&MC03 fe• EASEMENT � I M,I 60 I-dddd�' I0UT-334;e6334,8e 12' OMMLOW ARIES) r --- INFORIUAn[W JS4.osli 12 NDPE L-6!, .-dae46 ( , 6s D OM _ 1 t SHARED SNARED USE e2 PATNusavENT ), RIM-d16:16 J40.�F'� 1 �i EN-di6dd 3JS.OIi: (B) II IN(1r JJS 75i roar-a)aas�f'33a7ot _ J ' t L L ow j 1�1 TYPE -&B 1M- E-34a! J4ae4 EN-J36.27 JJe.H (1e•) •l � l hddTrP J37.z43 tar 33IL07 JX25 (far) IW-336.74 337.06 (12) SURK/ED LIGHT POLE '�•_` /�- ' '/t ,. t 1 1* 111M --� — - - --'-'_.^a'_"—' _ — _ -- _--�� _ 4 { \M a 14• SCH 40 PVC STUBBED UP 1 E a s TYPE B cai- 0 rPE34/aza 3444B34J.a9 4o SIDE11ALK DOST sATL MN 2 a UTILITY I IN J39.67 M-33&- 5337.99 tr S ENT / aT-339.57 I EN 339.38 ENk9 O.70 IW T-3da6@ 337.39. 13' -333J 10 Pali 3J9.34 339.20 ! ( LOT 3 1 2}S' sa-40 PVC /ilF I 4' SM 40 P- ((7FL f)-4- SCH 40 PVC (SPA I I 1 1 i i tea' 1 Lon CRfFIC10 a11.ET TOR LOf 330.673 K14UCTURV-33J292 STRUCTURE-1i1 ]Df Technology Park LOT 8C _; South Burlington, VT I - Lot 2 (aka 124 Technology Park Way) OWNER C0MMEv TY DRIVE i 124 Technology Park Way, LLC 3 30 Community Drive Suite 4 I South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802)860.1691 --� , Fax: (802)860-1695 I DESIGN BUILDER ReArch Company 30 Community Drive Suite 8 LOT 1 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)863-8727 I Fax: (802)863-8734 ARCHITECT: JOSEPH ARCHITECTS 1 25 Crossroad #1 Waterbury, VT 05676 p % Phone:(802)244-5220 CIVIL ENGINEER: Trudell Consulting Engineers ♦♦\ j 478 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)879-6331 Fax: (802)879-0060 RECEIVEt I I (^ j OCT 0 3 2011 r r� 1h C I J r;�ty of So. Burlington NIT 120 KIMBALL LLC 173 P 160 P& IDS J9 i I 1, I 6 U ! ROAD DATE: 10/03/2011 SCALE: 1'-3(Y ' RENSIONS ! No. Date Site Plan SP1 No Text PANORAMA FROM LOT 8A WEST PARKING AREA PANORAMA FROM COMMUNITY DRIVE WEST Technology Park S. Burlington, VT Trudell Consulting Engineers September, 26, 2011 Page 1 PANORAMA FROM KIMBALL AVENUE WEST OF COMCAST WAY PANORAMA FROM KIMBALL AVENUE NEAR SHUNPIKE ROAD RECEIVED OCT 0 3 2011 City of So. Burlington Technology Park S. Burlington, VT Trudell Consulting Engineers September, 26, 2011 Page 2 t�' Apr 0 �� 45P-0�-fib Site Plan Application Permit Number SP- - APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): 124 Technology Park Way, LLC 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:802-863-8727 Fax:802-863-8734 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): ReArch Company, LLC 30 Community Drive Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:802-863-8727 Fax:802-863-8734 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Kimberly Brown, Project Administrator ReArch Company, LLC 30 Community Drive Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:802-863-8727 Fax:802-863-8734 a.. Contact e-mail address: Kim b@rearchcompany.corn 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 124 Technology Park Way 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 1713-00124 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): The applicant is requesting approval to delete 45 plantings (winterberry) from the SW corner of the project. Site Plan Application b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Commerical Office Building c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): No Change d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): No Change e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): No Change f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): No Change g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non - office employees): No Change h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 217,947 Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing 8•3 % Proposed 8.3 % / 18,15: 18,153 sq. ft. sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 44.5 % / 96,971 sq. ft. Proposed 44.5 % / 96,971 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing 16.3 % / 4232 sq. ft. Proposed 16.3 % 4232 sq. ft. Site Plan Application d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 1 acre currently authorized under CGP-3-9020 * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ b. Landscaping (Z W 178 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost) 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC 4.3 Million No Change a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): No Change b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): No Change No Change 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: Sam to 5pm (No Change) 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday - Friday (No Change) 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Fall 2009 14. ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) 3 Site Plan Application 15. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). No Site Plan required per Ray Belair 4 Site Plan Application I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT John Nick SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: O � 7/ W9.16NEM, A REVIEW AUTHORITY: I I Development Review Board --i Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: ,ncomplete rector of Planrfing & Zoning or Designee 5 Date 1/0 A O, •N RO M southburlinoon PLANNING & ZONING November 22, 2010 Christa Vandevord Rearch Company 30 Community Drive, Ste 8 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Escrow Agreement Release-124 Technology Park Way Dear Ms. Vandevord: Please be advised that the City of South Burlington hereby releases you from the obligation of maintaining $50,500 in an escrow account at the Chittenden Bank now Peoples United Bank which was previously provided as a requirement for obtaining a zoning permit. Should you require additional information, please feel free to contact me. Sinc , R mond J. dBela4ir Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com OCT-1T-2007 03:08P FROM:CITY OF SOUTH BURLIN BOO-8464101 Tn:986i-169 P.1 SITE PLAN ESCROW AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, executed in triplicate by and between 1;C642 C 14 Polii "Pfc , hereinafter referred to as "Developer", the CITY O 'QQUTH BURLINGTON, hereinafter referred to as "Municipality", and the C 4111C I(e, Qa rn% hereinafter referred to as "Bank". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer has received site plan approval from the MUNICIPALITY'S Development Review Board for the development of property located at /pH /eehnolcq Ac.,e` LtA N as depicted on a site plan entitled °__S, e Ph„ _SPI ", dated jp-a- 2cx» , and prepared by :j&5,1/ WHEREAS, Developer is required by said approval, at its own expense, to complete certain improvements; and WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement wish to establish an escrow account to secure the obligations of the Developer as set forth in the City approval; and WHEREAS, the Bank executes this Agreement solely in the capacity of escrow agent. NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereby covenant and agree as follows: DEVELOPER will, at its own expense, complete the following construction as depicted and in accordance with the specifications set forth in said site plan and related documents: i J — 2. The Developer shall complete the improvements set forth in Paragraph one no later than Lt< 3. DEVELOPER shall replace or repair any defective or improper work or materials which may be recognized within three (3) years after completion of the improvements set forth in Paragraph one. For the purpose of this Agreement "completion" shall be deemed to have occurred when the OCT-17-2007 03:08P FROM:CITY OF SOUTH BURLIN 8028464101 TO:98601695 P.2 ) MUNICIPALITY has inspected and approved the construction of all the improvements required by this Agreement and issued written notice to the DEVELOPER that the construction is complete. 4. For the guaranty of Developer's performance of all requirements hIe,r�inabove set forth, and prior to the issuance of any zoning permit for P " Not,,_Z 1. f l 3 , Developer and Bank agree that the sum f *Ss o,00 shall be set aside and held in escrow by the Bank and shall be available for payment to the Municipality in accordance with the terms herein set forth. 5. If the Municipality shall file with the Bank a statement that the Developer is in the judgement of Municipality in default under the terms of this Agreement, the Bank shall from time to time pay monies from said escrow fund to the Municipality, in amounts not to exceed a total enabling the Municipality to complete improvements and requirements set forth in this Agreement. 6. The Municipality will promptly submit to the Developer a copy of such statement as it files with the Bank. The consent of the developer to such payment by the Bank to the Municipality shall not be required. The Bank shall incur no liability to the Developer on account of making such payment to the Municipality , nor shall the Bank be required to inquire into the propriety of any claim by the Municipality of default on the part of the Developer or into the use of such funds by the Municipality in completing such improvements. 7. The Municipality shall not file with the Bank a statement of default until thirty (30) days after notice has been sent by it to the Developer by certified mail, return receipt requested, setting forth its intention to do so. 8. All monies released by the Bank to the Municipality pursuant to paragraph five (5) shall be used by the Municipality solely for the purpose of performing obligations imposed upon the Developer by that portion of this Agreement upon which the Developer is then in default. Any work to be performed by the Municipality pursuant hereto shall be let on a contractual basis, or on a time and material basis or shall be performed by the Municipality with its own work force and equipment or shall be accomplished in such a manner as in the judgement of the Municipality shall accomplish the work most expeditiously and economically. 9. If monies are released by the Bank to the Municipality pursuant to paragraph five (5) and it shall later develop that a portion of the released monies are surplus to the Municipality's needs, any such surplus shall be refunded by the Municipality to the Bank to be held and distributed by the Bank pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. OCT-17-2007 03:09P FROH:CITY OF SOUTH BURLIN 8028464101 TO:98601695 P.3 10.The Bank will not refuse or delay to make such payments to the Municipality when requested by the Municipality by the appropriate statement, and Developer will not interfere with or hinder such payments by the Bank to the Municipality. Said statement shall contain a certificate of compliance with the notice requirements of paragraph seven (7) of this agreement. 11. This agreement shall terminate and shall be of no force or effect upon performance of all requirements contemplated hereby, and the completion of the warranty period set forth in paragraph three (3). 12. The sum of If 5Q „Soo shall be maintained in escrow until certification to the Bank by the Municipality of the completion of the warranty period set forth in paragraph three (3). 13.This agreement shall not only be binding upon the parties hereto, but also their respective heirs, executers, administrators, successors, and assigns. OCT-17-2007 03:09P FROM:CITY OF SOUTH BURLIN 8028464101 TO:98601695 PA Dated at this day of /7' ( ter- , 2007 . KIUA /.a'.. WtU ' gyp- Witness Du (DI Dated at this day of lifted Agent PER'S NAME) Witness J " l_J(AU Witness Duly Authorized Agent CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Dated at this day of to L,;is-- , 2021, Witness fitness By: -t Duly Authorized Agent (NAME OF BAN `d PARTY) 6592 - a MEMO Escrow Deposit 11100659 20 TECHNOLOGY PARK Technology Park Partners TECHNOLOGY PARK 30 COMMUNITY DR., SUITE 4 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05043 CHITTENDEN BANK BURLINGTON, VT 05402-0820 58-6/116 10/18/2007 PAY TO THE Technology Park Partners $ **50,500.00 ORDER OF Fifty Thousand Five Hundred and .1e W ID C O w y O DOLLARS a Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive, Suite #4 South Burlington, VT 05403 PW m - LL --- - --"" AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE i:0 L L60006 21:11'0 L11, 5 2l,, 58bOilI Us I Escrow Deposit for landscaping 10/18/2007 6592 50,500.00 Chittenden Bank Chec Escrow Deposit 50,500.00 r ®► Flo' d southburlington PLANNING & ZONING July 14, 2010 Josh Quinn Rearch Co, LLC 30 Community Drive, Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Expiration of Site Plan #SP-09-90 — 124 Technology Park Way Dear Mr. Quinn: Please be advised that Site Plan Approval #SP-09-90, issued on 11/24/2009 to revise the landscaping plan has expired. This approval expired due to not obtaining a zoning permit within six (6) months of the date of this approval, as required by condition #3 of said approval. Since you have already revised your landscaping without a permit, you must now submit an application for re -approval as soon as possible. Sincer R mond VBeir Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tell 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com �T PROJECT MEMO To: Mr. Ray Belair From: William Park Date: 10/02/07 Re: Tech Park Lot 2 - Stormwater Project #: 2007100 Mr. Belair, On behalf of Technology Park Partners, Trudell Consulting Engineers is submitting a revised stormwater design brief to reflect the most recent set of plans. A draft of the design brief was submitted on 9/13/07 to Tom Di Pietro. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions or comments. Thanks. Ir TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Road Williston, VT 05495 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 trudellconsulting.com STORMWATER DESIGN BRIEF For TECHNOLOGY PARK — LOTS 2 & 3 South Burlington, Vermont Prepared by: William W. Park, E.I. Jeremy M. Matosky, P.E. Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Williston, Vermont 05495 Applicant: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT. 05403 Date: October 2, 2007 TCE #2007100 E TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 2. RECEIVING WATERS 1 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 4. PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED STORMWATER SYSTEM 1 5. PROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM 2 APPENDIX • Exhibit 1: USGS Location Map • Exhibit 2: Soil Map • Exhibit 3: Pre -Development Drainage Area Map & Hydrologic Calculations for 10-Year, 24-Hour Storm Event • Exhibit 4: Post -Development Drainage Area Map & Hydrologic Calculations for 10-Year, 24-Hour Storm Event • Exhibit 5: Post -Development Hydrologic Calculations for 1-Year, 24-fiour Storm Event • Exhibit 6: Post -Development Hydrologic Calculations for a 0.9" Storm Event with Exact Modified CN Numbers • Exhibit 7: Project Plans & Details Technology Park Lots 2 & 3 — South Burlington, Vermont 1. Project Description: Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) has completed an analysis to evaluate stormwater treatment practices that would meet Vermont Stormwater Treatment Standards (April 2002) required for a proposed office buildings and associated parking on Lots 2 and 3 of Technology Park in South Burlington, Vermont. Technology Park Partners received Discharge Permit #1-1458 to discharge stormwater from Lots 2 and 3 of Technology Park off Kimball Avenue in South Burlington, Vermont to Potash Brook. This permit expired on March 31, 2006. A request for a Title 3 extension was submitted prior to the expiration of this permit. Lots 2 and 3 are currently covered under Title 3 until an individual or general permit is issued for Potash Brook. The proposed project includes a three story office building and associated parking on each lot along, a community bike path, and a shared access drive from Community Drive to the east. The parking areas and access drive will utilize curbs and a closed catch basin system that drains to one of two Extended Detention Shallow Wetlands. 2. Receiving Waters: The receiving water from the project is Potash Brook. 3. Existing Conditions: The undeveloped portion of Technology Park is an open meadow. A drainage divide exists in the middle of the park between Potash Brook and Muddy Brook. Stormwater runoff sheet flows off the site and into an existing Class II wetland located on Lot 1, created by the sewer line (constructed in 1977) servicing the Technology Park Center. Due to the existing discharge permits for other lots in Technology Park, the one discharge point for this project has been designated as S/N003. The location of the one discharge point is at the outlet of the culvert under the man-made berm for the sewer line, east of Community Drive. The soil underlying the site is identified in the Chittenden County Soil Survey as Vergennes clay, 2 to 6 percent slopes, HSG D, very low permeability. 4. Previously Permitted Stormwater System: The following description of the previously permitted stormwater system is taken from the Manner of Discharge for SIN003 from Discharge Permit #1-1458: Stormwater runoff from the two buildings is conveyed via overland flow and grassed swales to the Class II wetland and detention pond 3 prior to discharge to Potash Brook. The first inch of Stormwater runoff from the associated parking is conveyed via a closed system to one of two pocket wetlands for treatment then to the Class II wetland and detention pond 3 prior to discharge to Potash Brook. 2 Technology Park Lots 2 & 3 — South Burlington, Vermont 5. Proposed Stormwater System: S/N003: • Amount of impervious area: o Existing: 0.00 acres o Redeveloped: 0.00 acres o New: 4.89 acres • Receiving water identification: Potash Brook • Cold/Warm Fish Habitat Designation for Receiving water: Cold water fish habitat • Location of Discharge Point: o N44°27' 10" o W73°08'47" • Water Quality Treatment Standard (WQv): This treatment standard was met using two Extended Detention Shallow Wetlands (W-2). The HydroCAD 8.00 model of the project was adjusted using the exact Modified Curve number calculation to accurately model the Water Quality storm event. The inverts of the catch basins discharging to the constructed wetland were adjusted to ensure the Water Quality storm event enters the two constructed wetlands, with excess bypassing the system. In general, the Lot 2 constructed wetland treats stormwater runoff from Lot 2 and the Lot 3 constructed wetland treats stormwater runoff from Lot 3 and the shared access drive. The following tables show the base data that was used in determining the depths and surface areas required in each wetland to meet the treatment standard: Table 1: Drainage Area Characteristics WQv (c.f.) DA (s.f.) Mod CN Lot 2 6,900 130,885 97.3 Lot 3 7,994 210,820 94.6 Table 2: Lot 2 Wetland Data Pool Depth in. Surface Area s.f. Storage c.f. 0" 3388 4808 6" 2508 3334 18" 1379 1 1397 Table 3: Lot 3 Wetland Data Pool Depth in. Surface Area s.f. Storage c.f. 0" 4624 7613 6" 3768 5522 F77i77, 2226 2540 Technology Park Lots 2 & 3 — South Burlington, Vermont Table 4: Treatment Standard Requirements for W-2 Wetland # % of WQv cu. ft.) Min. Surface Area Allocation (sq. ft.) Min. Permenant Pool Volume Allocation Allowable ED Volume Forebay Deep Pool (� 4') <_ 6 <_ 18 % of DA Dee Pool (p4') <_ 6" 6" to 18" Regs. 10% 25% 5% 25% 50% 1.0% of DA 20% Min. 35% 45% Lot 2 - Required 690 1725 345 1725 3450 1 1309 262 458 589 Lot 2 - Current 2582 4808 1474 3411 2776 8865 3388 880 1129 Lot 3 - Required 799 1999 400 1999 3997 2108 422 738 949 Lot 3 - Current 1557 7613 2091 5073 3147 8858 4624 856 1542 Each wetland has a 4 foot deep forebay and permanent pool, a high marsh area (less than 6" water depth), a low marsh area (water depth between 6" and 18"), a controlled outlet with low flow orifices and riser, and an emergency spillway. Due to the space limitations of the site, the wetland slopes have been designed to eliminate the need for safety and aquatic benches. The wetlands have been graded with 4:1 side slopes in the permanent pool areas and 3:1 side slopes from the permanent pool to the top of the berm. A minimum flow path of 2:1 has been provided across each stormwater wetland. The required landscaping elements have been incorporated in each wetland. Adequate space for maintenance access has been provided to each wetland. Stormwater runoff from the portions of the community bike path that does not enter either of the wetlands will be treated via vegetative disconnection. • Groundwater Recharge Treatment Standard (Rev): This treatment standard is waived due to the soils underlying the site. Vergennes clay has an Hydrologic Soil Group of D, with a corresponding recharge factor of zero, therefore this treatment standard is waived. • Channel Protection Treatment Standard (CPv): The Channel Protection Treatment Standard requires the 12-hour extended detention (ED) of the 1-year, 24-hour rainfall event. This treatment standard is met by providing the detention time provided by the one -inch minimum orifice size (37 minutes) at the most downstream controlled outlet on Lot 1. An overflow weir has been set above the peak elevation of the 1-year, 24-hour rainfall event to control larger storms. A debris rack will be provided on the outlet structure to prevent clogging of the orifice. Stormwater Desi Technology Park Lots 2 & 3 — South Burlington, Vermont • Overbank Protection Treatment Standard (QpIo): The Overbank Flood Protection Treatment Standard requires that the post -development peak discharge rate not exceed the pre -development peak discharge rate for the 10-year, 24-hour storm event. The pre -development and post -development runoff rates for the 10- year, 24-hour storm were calculated using HydroCAD stormwater modeling software. The pre- and post -development discharge rates are 8.40 cfs and 2.14 cfs, respectively, therefore this treatment standard is met. • Extreme Flood Protection Treatment Standard (Qploo): The Extreme Flood Protection Standard requires that the post -development peak discharge rate shall not exceed the pre -development peak discharge rate for the 100-year, 24-hour storm event. The requirement is waived for sites that contain less than 10 acres of impervious area. This site contains 4.89 acres of impervious area and therefore the requirement is waived. • Manner of Discharge: Stormwater runoff from the parking areas, access drive, and portions of the rooftop are conveyed via sheet flow and a closed catch basin system to one of two Extended Detention Shallow Wetlands with controlled outlet devices. These wetlands discharge to Class II wetland with a controlled outlet device that discharges to culvert that discharges to Potash Brook. EXHIBIT 1: USGS LOCATION MAP 0 3° 9' 0 0 " �73° 0 ' 0 WV 73° Op' ^ r jlV , , , , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 3° 9 fi 4P `' "� z .. dF . a Z o 40 0 0 • .� t o 0 v !ram Win v C- �./�I v 1 i A,/ L't 1-.( - Z --ion r r Z V.J 3 #— 6 L4,7- 0— .J oil r N o !q II 1 www w. I I♦ �•.ww .w I�+.r1� 1 0 t � 4 I+ Z •,- Z o � F � v io o � o - t o 15° W 0 3 9'0)0 " 1 0 3 8'0.0 " Name: BURLINGTON Location: 044° 27' 06.23" N 073° 08' 31.32" W Date: 8/30/2007 Caption: Project Location Map Scale: 1 inch equals 667 feet Technology Park Lots 2 3 Copyright (C) 1997, Maptech, Inc. EXHIBIT 2: SOIL MAP Soil Map—Chittenden County, Vermont (Technology Park Lots 2-3) N Meters A 0 100 200 400 600 Feet 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0 10/2/2007 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4 MAPLEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) - Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Units Special Point Features Blowout ® Borrow Pit X Clay Spot ♦ Closed Depression Y Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill A Lava Flow Marsh 5t Mine or Quarry © Miscellaneous Water O. Perennial Water v Rock Outcrop + Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot p Sinkhole h Slide or Slip g Sodic Spot Spoil Area Q Stony Spot Soil Map—Chittenden County, Vermont (Technology Park Lots 2-3) Very Stony Spot + Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Gully Short Steep Slope F Other Political Features Municipalities ® Cities 0 Urban Areas Water Features Oceans Streams and Canals Transportation i-� Rails Roads n� Interstate Highways US Routes State Highways Local Roads Other Roads MAP INFORMATION Original soil survey map sheets were prepared at publication scale. Viewing scale and printing scale, however, may vary from the original. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for proper map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov Coordinate System: UTM Zone 18N This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Chittenden County, Vermont Survey Area Data: Version 10, Sep 26, 2007 Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 4/25/1999 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0 10/2/2007 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4 Soil Map-Chittenden County, Vermont Map Unit Legend Technology Park Lots 2-3 Chittenden County, Vermont (VT007) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI AdA Adams and Windsor loamy 18.1 5.9% sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes 2.7% AdB Adams and Windsor loamy 8.3 sands, 5 to 12 percent slopes AdD Adams and Windsor loamy 10.8 3.5% sands, 12 to 30 percent slopes Adams and Windsor loamy 0.6% AdE 1.8 sands, 30 to 60 percent slopes 7.2 2.3% 2.5% An Alluvial land BIA Belgrade and Eldridge soils, 0 7.6 to 3 percent slopes Cv Covington silty Gay 45.5 14.8% EwA Enosburg and Whately soils, 0 9.0 2.9% to 3 percent slopes FaC Farmington extremely rocky 4.9 1.6% loam, 5 to 20 percent slopes FsB Farmington -Stockbridge rocky 0.1 0.0% loams, 5 to 12 percent slopes HnA Hinesburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 6.6 2.2% 3 percent slopes HnB Hinesburg fine sandy loam, 3 to 10.2 3.3% 8 percent slopes HnE Hinesburg fine sandy loam, 25 2.8 0.9% to 60 percent slopes Lf Limerick silt loam, very wet 10.7 3.5% MuD Munson and Belgrade silt 4.8 1.6% loams, 12 to 25 percent slopes ScA Scantic silt loam, 0 to 2 percent 12.1 3.9% slopes TeE Terrace escarpments, silty and 2.1 0.7% clayey VeB Vergennes clay, 2 to 6 percent 124.2 40.5% slopes VeC Vergennes day, 6 to 12 percent 7.2 2.3% slopes VeD Vergennes day, 12 to 25 7.1 2.3% percent slopes VeE Vergennes day, 25 to 60 3.3 1.1% percent slopes W Water 2.7 0.9% Totals for Area of Interest (AOI) 307.01 100.0% I',! z� Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0 10/2/2007 1 m= Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 Soil Map—Chittenden County, Vermont Technology Park Lots 2-3 Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0 10/2/2007 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT 3: PRE -DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA MAP & HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS FOR 10-YEAR, 24-HOUR STORM EVENT • 1 ------ nW OF ,—DRAWAOE AREA ��CMCMMPM ( 0� -DRAINAGE AREA 1 R I' f - / LOT 1 O ` i ` •. , � � BUFFER __ •^•�. LOT 2 --- �� \ _ O O� \ LOT 3 - O O O d\ O' / •/ • OGraphic Scale OFJwn( Feet `•` •; t �, 60 0 60 120 180 240 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (rCE) 478 Blsk Pak R.W P.O. B- 308 (807j 8746.i31V-4 WMAM V-9 05495 MU) 8740"150 VtJt Ib m 8e WeD aL vnvw.figeMonxiUtg.mm CONQ1fUAl ARROVAL xmAravoN Rf1JiANARY A OVAL 6taaavaN AR M ADMIS90N IF Arnjc u lQU1L A OVA AlMISMON cofailUcilON pUWHcs r. .min c�n�, vanW sre mpv..., z ,,.,v.0 w.....a,.rw, v..,r.a.a w c....e • I .,.ee, re a. o•,l..c rl.,v... a.co,:.. acr .. ro a • wynr w a. xMeW .r ms+ o>n.wu,. u,n... (rr:El s.w. R.Nelm, tc PI- 00/DO/b0 )0(X %i0. Dtwlpllm Dahe By Pfc,W We TECHNOLOGY PARK LOTS 2&3 Community Drive South Burlington, Vr Shedim. Pre-Development Drainage Area Map Dr-AnSh%xnber: 70000,E-39 Exotldion: 1 P-led rrH W-: ,aM Drawn • knP Dater OBIJ1/07 F.B. 000 Scale : P - 60' P� rdavroe a xxx X-W: 2000048c1e Bench File Approved PRE SN03 S/ 03 A Lot # and 3 ODA1 Drainage Area 1 Subcat Reach on Link Drainage Diagram for Lots 2&3, PRE 02 Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) 8/30/2007 HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 002428 0 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Lots 2&3, PRE 02 Type // 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Page 2 HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 002428 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/30/2007 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment DA1: Drainage Area 1 Runoff Area=845,888 sf Runoff Depth>1.14" Flow Length=1,177' Tc=50.5 min CN=78 Runoff=14.37 cfs 1.841 of Reach SN03: S/N003 Inflow=8.40 cfs 1.828 of Outflow=8.40 cfs 1.828 of Pond P1: Lot #1 Pond 3 Peak Elev=332.26' Storage=18,237 cf Inflow=14.37 cfs 1.841 of 21.0" x 130.0' Culvert Outflow=8.40 cfs 1.828 of Total Runoff Area = 19.419 ac Runoff Volume = 1.841 of Average Runoff Depth = 1.14" 100.00% Pervious Area = 19.419 ac 0.00% Impervious Area = 0.000 ac Lots 2&3, PRE 02 Type // 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Page 3 HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 002428 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/30/2007 Subcatchment DA1: Drainage Area 1 Runoff = 14.37 cfs @ 12.52 hrs, Volume= 1.841 af, Depth> 1.14" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Area (sf) CN Desch 845,888 78 Meadow, non -grazed, HSG D 845,888 Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 16.8 100 0.0200 0.10 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 1.7 100 0.0200 0.99 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt2 Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 32.0 977 0.0180 0.51 0.68 Parabolic Channel, Tt3 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.035 Earth. dense weeds 50.5 1,177 Total Reach SN03: S/N003 Inflow Area = 19.419 ac, Inflow Depth > 1.13" for 10-Year event Inflow = 8.40 cfs @ 12.97 hrs, Volume= 1.828 of Outflow = 8.40 cfs @ 12.97 hrs, Volume= 1.828 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Pond P1: Lot #1 Pond 3 Inflow Area = 19.419 ac, Inflow Depth > 1.14" for 10-Year event Inflow = 14.37 cfs @ 12.52 hrs, Volume= 1.841 of Outflow = 8.40 cfs @ 12.97 hrs, Volume= 1.828 af, Atten= 42%, Lag= 26.7 min Primary = 8.40 cfs @ 12.97 hrs, Volume= 1.828 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 332.26' @ 12.97 hrs Surf.Area= 27,488 sf Storage= 18,237 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 25.8 min calculated for 1.828 of (99% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 23.2 min ( 856.3 - 833.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 330.50' 230,843 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Lots 2&3, PRE 02 Type 11 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Page 4 HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 002428 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/30/2007 Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 330.50 100 0 0 331.00 2,240 585 585 332.00 20,400 11,320 11,905 333.00 47,200 33,800 45,705 334.00 87,680 67,440 113,145 335.00 147,715 117,698 230,843 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 330.58' 21.0" x 130.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.600 Outlet Invert= 330.01' S= 0.0044 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean Primary OutFlow Max=8.40 cfs @ 12.97 hrs HW=332.26' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 8.40 cfs @ 4.52 fps) EXHIBIT 4: POST -DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA MAP & HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS FOR 10-YEAR, 24-HOUR STORM EVENT - •a 'f� a 1 �f: f 1� 4^ 'YI '1 jf: ♦Q \I • n.'., 1.01 3 ED SHALLOW WETLAND 0� Graphic Scale Feet 60 0 60 120 180 240 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (ICE) 47881atr P.k P.W P.O.11-308 (13M879fi.331(p-4 VJmhmn, VamtlK 05M MM 8794060a.0 MStth OWtMWe64M pww7RKkDCo:mi&WCM rrr::ws Au anAu :a na vroa< CXNOJNAL "IMOVAL PRUMANAAY A OVAL A/Ma9oN AR M ADM631CX4 V APPLKAE ft A APMOVAL S1DMQ COraTRIJM0N t WWA � Are rror...a„o. v r�.Ww w.nr.e b .a,Mna r. wt.�e.e b w+r.A.rr pemfw. ca�rcnm eN emtat em.nr�4 .prfim�ima e.nr/wiNxfr y erect✓ .nn otnr Japb.a inr r. .wdk to IM po}ct II ma e. ermr.e Mq ua to N eW ti fr kr ✓ hueM [mr✓IM Cryrr. (rtF) C.b. _ erm.nq b m..mrcnm ✓.. gs}ct :n. lrolr� (M1�/M.) nu �.N.we aa...a .✓ xe.pM w e�a.+# real b eaWrW flq kpewe mcY�tfgM rMr .M. oM liad gpo�4 r M maY Er-� T.w aa.nP mE � Mvw! w a�n�s�: raN.lma M �r M.v. tA6 r9Y earoln. M. m 0 R.v -. t. pf- w/w/w xxx �e TECHNOLOGY PARK LOTS 2&3 Community Drive South Burlington, VT Skmet Title Post-Development Drainage Area Map DmwMSNlftnba: 2000048-39 Extension: 1 _ Project m.mga: .MAt Drawn: WI Date: 08/J11107 FA OM Scale: I'. 60• Project tder.Ns: XXX x-W: 7000048dc Sench Pie : XXX POST J A Dumpster Area CB4 Catch Basin Dr ai Manhole #8 CB CB11 DA4 ----{i RD Catch in #11 � Lot 2 Rooftop Roof Drain DMH#10 DA2\ Lot 2 OSubcat Reach on Link 1 �, SN03 S/ 03 DA1 C P1 Offsite of #qnd 1 \ I � I � Lot 2 ED W land I _W3 Lot 3 Wetland I CB MH8 I CB DMH9 Drain M Whole #9 �,DA3 Lot 3 Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 11 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 2 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment DA1: Offsite Runoff Area=512,084 sf 1.12% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.14" Flow Length=1,160' Tc=53.2 min CN=78 Runoff=8.36 cfs 1.113 of Subcatchment DA2: Lot 2 Runoff Area=106,089 sf 68.79% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.20" Flow Length=280' Tc=5.4 min CN=92 Runoff =9.62 cfs 0.447 of Subcatchment DA3: Lot 3 Runoff Area=210,820 sf 50.71% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.91" Flow Length=1,314' Tc=46.1 min CN=89 Runoff=6.52 cfs 0.772 of Subcatchment DA4: Lot 2 Rooftop Runoff Area=18,152 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.75" Flow Length=40' Slope=0.0100 T Tc=0.9 min CN=98 Runoff=2.10 cfs 0.095 of Subcatchment DA5: Dumpster Area Runoff Area=6,644 sf 59.33% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.11" Flow Length=98' Tc=3.0 min CN=91 Runoff=0.63 cfs 0.027 of Reach RD: Roof Drain Avg. Depth=0.54' Max Vet=4.79 fps Inflow=2.10 cfs 0.095 of D=12.0" n=0.009 L=20.0' S=0.0050 T Capacity=3.64 cfs Outflow=2.08 cfs 0.095 of Reach SN03: S/N003 Pond 1 P: DMH#10 Inflow=2.14 cfs 0.993 of Outflow=2.14 cfs 0.993 of Peak Elev=336.38' Inflow=2.08 cfs 0.095 of 12.0" x 80.0' Culvert Outflow=2.08 cfs 0.095 of Pond CB11: Catch Basin #11 Peak Elev=335.94' Inflow=9.62 cfs 0.447 of Primary=7.32 cfs 0.419 of Secondary=2.30 cfs 0.028 of Outflow=9.62 cfs 0.447 of Pond CB4: Catch Basin #4 Peak Elev=334.96' Inflow=0.63 cfs 0.027 of 12.0" x 70.0' Culvert Outflow=0.63 cfs 0.027 of Pond DMH8: Drain Manhole #8 Peak Elev=335.19' Inflow=2.65 cfs 0.122 of 12.0" x 57.0' Culvert Outflow=2.65 cfs 0.122 of Pond DMH9: Drain Manhole #9 Peak Elev=337.52' Inflow=6.52 cfs 0.772 of Primary=5.06 cfs 0.702 of Secondary=1.46 cfs 0.070 of Outflow=6.52 cfs 0.772 of Pond P1: Lot #1 Pond 3 Peak Elev=333.33' Storage=63,305 cf Inflow=12.05 cfs 2.354 of Outflow=2.14 cfs 0.993 of Pond W2: Lot 2 ED Wetland Peak Elev=335.31' Storage=14,535 cf Inflow=9.57 cfs 0.541 of Primary=3.02 cfs 0.526 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=3.02 cfs 0.526 of Pond W3: Lot 3 ED Wetland Peak Elev=337.64' Storage=21,456 cf Inflow=5.06 cfs 0.702 of Primary=1.66 cfs 0.616 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=1.66 cfs 0.616 of Total Runoff Area = 19.600 ac Runoff Volume = 2.454 of Average Runoff Depth = 1.50" 75.67% Pervious = 14.832 ac 24.33% Impervious = 4.769 ac Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type // 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20' Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Subcatchment DA1: Offsite Runoff = 8.36 cfs @ 12.56 hrs, Volume= 1.113 af, Depth> 1.14" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Area (sf) CN Description 506,352 78 Meadow, non -grazed, HSG D 5,732 98 Impervious 512,084 78 Weighted Average 506,352 Pervious Area 5,732 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 18.9 100 0.0150 0.09 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 1.9 100 0.0150 0.86 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt2 Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 32.4 960 0.0170 0.49 0.66 Parabolic Channel, Tt3 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.035 Earth, dense weeds 53.2 1,160 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA2: Lot 2 Runoff = 9.62 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.447 af, Depth> 2.20" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Area (sf) CN Description 33,111 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 72,978 98 Impervious 106,089 92 Weighted Average 33,111 Pervious Area 72,978 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 3.7 44 0.1700 0.20 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.6 56 0.0450 1.44 Sheet Flow, Tt2 Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 0.4 100 0.0375 3.93 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt3 Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 0.7 80 0.0310 1.80 2.40 Parabolic Channel, Tt4 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.013 Asphalt, smooth Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 11 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 5.4 280 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA3: Lot 3 Runoff = 6.52 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 0.772 af, Depth> 1.91" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Area (sf) CN Description 103,905 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 106,915 98 Impervious 210,820 89 Weighted Average 103,905 Pervious Area 106,915 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 29.3 100 0.0050 0.06 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 3.4 100 0.0050 0.49 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt2 Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 9.3 175 0.0050 0.31 0.42 Parabolic Channel, Tt3 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.030 Earth, grassed & winding 1.9 161 0.0200 1.44 1.92 Parabolic Channel, Tt4 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.013 Asphalt, smooth 1.2 328 0.0050 4.63 3.64 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt5 Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r= 0.25' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 0.4 172 0.0100 6.55 5.15 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt6 Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r= 0.25' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 0.0 18 0.0270 10.77 8.46 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt7 Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r= 0.25' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 0.6 260 0.0090 7.21 8.85 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt8 Diam= 15.0" Area= 1.2 sf Perim= 3.9' r= 0.31' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 46.1 1,314 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA4: Lot 2 Rooftop Runoff = 2.10 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.095 af, Depth> 2.75" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type 11 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type/1 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Area (sf) CN Description 18,152 98 Impervious 18,152 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.9 40 0.0100 0.74 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" Summary for Subcatchment DA5: Dumpster Area Runoff = 0.63 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.027 af, Depth> 2.11" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Area (sf) CN Description 2,702 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 3,942 98 Impervious 6,644 91 Weighted Average 2,702 Pervious Area 3,942 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.2 25 0.2000 0.19 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.8 73 0.0400 1.44 Sheet Flow, Tt2 Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 3.0 98 Total Summary for Reach RD: Roof Drain Inflow Area = 0.417 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.75" for 10-Year event Inflow = 2.10 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.095 of Outflow = 2.08 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.095 af, Atten= 1 %, Lag= 0.1 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 4.79 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.1 min Avg. Velocity = 1.59 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.2 min Peak Storage= 9 cf @ 11.90 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.54' Bank -Full Depth= 1.00', Capacity at Bank -Full= 3.64 cfs 12.0" Diameter Pipe, n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Length= 20.0' Slope= 0.0050 7' Inlet Invert= 335.60', Outlet Invert= 335.50' Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type // 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Reach SN03: SM003 Inflow Area = 19.600 ac, 24.33% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.61" for 10-Year event Inflow = 2.14 cfs @ 16.21 hrs, Volume= 0.993 of Outflow = 2.14 cfs @ 16.21 hrs, Volume= 0.993 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Summary for Pond 1 P: DMH#10 Inflow Area = 0.417 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.74" for 10-Year event Inflow = 2.08 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.095 of Outflow = 2.08 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.095 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 2.08 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.095 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 336.38' @ 11.90 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 335.40' 12.0" x 80.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.00' S= 0.0175 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=2.06 cfs @ 11.90 hrs HW=336.37' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 2.06 cfs @ 2.65 fps) Summary for Pond CB11: Catch Basin #11 Inflow Area = 2.435 ac, 68.79% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.20" for 10-Year event Inflow = 9.62 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.447 of Outflow = 9.62 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.447 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 7.32 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.419 of Secondary = 2.30 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.028 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 335.94' @ 11.96 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 334.00' 18.0" x 15.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 333.50' S= 0.0333 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Secondary 334.85' 12.0" x 165.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 333.05' S= 0.0109 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type // 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Primary OutFlow Max=7.22 cfs @ 11.96 hrs HW=335.91' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 7.22 cfs @ 4.09 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=2.22 cfs @ 11.96 hrs HW=335.90' (Free Discharge) 't2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 2.22 cfs @ 2.82 fps) Summary for Pond CB4: Catch Basin #4 Inflow Area = 0.153 ac, 59.33% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.11" for 10-Year event Inflow = 0.63 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.027 of Outflow = 0.63 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.027 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.63 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.027 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs. Peak Elev= 334.96' @ 11.93 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 334.50' 12.0" x 70.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.00' S= 0.0071 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=0.60 cfs @ 11.93 hrs HW=334.94' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.60 cfs @ 1.79 fps) Summary for Pond DMH8: Drain Manhole #8 Inflow Area = 0.569 ac, 89.10% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.58" for 10-Year event Inflow = 2.65 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.122 of Outflow = 2.65 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.122 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 2.65 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.122 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 335.19' @ 11.90 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 333.90' 12.0" x 57.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 333.50' S= 0.0070 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=2.62 cfs @ 11.90 hrs HW=335.17' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 2.62 cfs @ 3.34 fps) Summary for Pond DMH9: Drain Manhole #9 Inflow Area = 4.840 ac, 50.71 % Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.91" for 10-Year event Inflow = 6.52 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 0.772 of Outflow = 6.52 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 0.772 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 5.06 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 0.702 of Secondary = 1.46 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 0.070 of Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 11 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 337.52' @ 12.44 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 336.07' 18.0" x 20.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 336.00' S= 0.0035 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Secondary 336.77' 12.0" x 320.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.80' S= 0.0062 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=5.05 cfs @ 12.44 hrs HW=337.52' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 5.05 cfs @ 3.69 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=1.46 cfs @ 12.44 hrs HW=337.52' (Free Discharge) L2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 1.46 cfs @ 2.32 fps) Summary for Pond P1: Lot #1 Pond 3 Inflow Area = 19.600 ac, 24.33% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.44" for 10-Year event Inflow = 12.05 cfs @ 12.51 hrs, Volume= 2.354 of Outflow = 2.14 cfs @ 16.21 hrs, Volume= 0.993 af, Atten= 82%, Lag= 222.2 min Primary = 2.14 cfs @ 16.21 hrs, Volume= 0.993 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 333.33' @ 16.21 hrs Surf.Area= 60,438 sf Storage= 63,305 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 268.3 min calculated for 0.993 of (42% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 151.5 min ( 1,005.6 - 854.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 330.50' 113,145 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 330.50 100 0 0 331.00 2,240 585 585 332.00 20,400 11,320 11,905 333.00 47,200 33,800 45,705 334.00 87,680 67,440 113,145 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 330.58' 21.0" x 130.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.600 Outlet Invert= 330.01' S= 0.0044'/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean #2 Device 1 330.58' 1.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 333.00' 4.0' long x 0.7' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 Coef. (English) 2.76 2.82 2.93 3.09 3.18 3.22 3.27 3.30 3.32 3.31 3.32 Lots 20, POST 06 Type 1124-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Primary OutFlow Max=2.14 cfs @ 16.21 hrs HW=333.33' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Passes 2.14 cfs of 12.85 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifi ce/G rate (Orifice Controls 0.04 cfs @ 7.92 fps) 3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 2.09 cfs @ 1.60 fps) Summary for Pond W2: Lot 2 ED Wetland Inflow Area = 3.005 ac, 72.64% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.16" for 10-Year event Inflow = 9.57 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.541 of Outflow = 3.02 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.526 af, Atten= 68%, Lag= 9.9 min Primary = 3.02 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.526 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Starting Elev= 333.50' Surf.Area= 3,388 sf Storage= 4,808 cf Peak Elev= 335.31' @ 12.10 hrs Surf.Area= 7,487 sf Storage= 14,535 cf (9,727 cf above start) Plug -Flow detention time= 192.3 min calculated for 0.416 of (77% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 83.4 min ( 839.4 - 756.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 329.50' 20,146 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 329.50 35 0 0 330.00 146 45 45 331.00 583 365 410 332.00 1,379 981 1,391 333.00 2,508 1,944 3,334 334.00 4,268 3,388 6,722 335.00 6,857 5,563 12,285 336.00 8,865 7,861 20,146 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 333.25' 12.0" x 25.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.600 Outlet Invert= 333.15' S= 0.0040 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Device 1 333.50' 3.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate X 3.00 C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 335.00' 13.9" Horiz. Orifice/Grate Limited to weir flow C= 0.600 #4 Secondary 335.50' 10.0' long x 4.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.38 2.54 2.69 2.68 2.67 2.67 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.68 2.72 2.73 2.76 2.79 2.88 3.07 3.32 Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type/1 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Primary OutFlow Max=3.00 cfs @ 12.10 hrs HW=335.31' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Passes 3.00 cfs of 4.43 cfs potential flow) 1:3=Orifi 2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.92 cfs @ 6.25 fps) ce/Grate (Weir Controls 2.08 cfs @ 1.83 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=333.50' (Free Discharge) L4=13road-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond W3: Lot 3 ED Wetland Inflow Area = 4.840 ac, 50.71 % Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.74" for 10-Year event Inflow = 5.06 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 0.702 of Outflow = 1.66 cfs @ 13.30 hrs, Volume= 0.616 af, Atten= 67%, Lag= 51.8 min Primary = 1.66 cfs @ 13.30 hrs, Volume= 0.616 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Starting Elev= 335.50' Surf.Area= 4,624 sf Storage= 7,613 cf Peak Elev= 337.64' @ 13.30 hrs Surf.Area= 8,260 sf Storage= 21,456 cf (13,843 cf above start) Plug -Flow detention time= 251.0 min calculated for 0.442 of (63% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 111.6 min ( 918.8 - 807.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Stora e Storage Description #1 331.50' 24,513 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 331.50 112 0 0 332.00 447 140 140 333.00 1,064 756 895 334.00 2,226 1,645 2,540 335.00 3,738 2,982 5,522 336.00 5,509 4,624 10,146 338.00 8,858 14,367 24,513 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 335.35' 12.0" x 115.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.80' S= 0.0048 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Device 1 335.50' 3.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate X 3.00 C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 337.50' 13.9" Horiz. Orifice/Grate Limited to weir flow C= 0.600 #4 Secondary 338.00' 10.0' long x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type // 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Primary OutFlow Max=1.65 cfs @ 13.30 hrs HW=337.64' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Passes 1.65 cfs of 4.00 cfs potential flow) 1:3=Orifice/G 2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 1.01 cfs @ 6.84 fps) rate (Weir Controls 0.64 cfs @ 1.24 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=335.50' (Free Discharge) 't-4= Broad-C rested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) EXHIBIT 5: POST -DEVELOPMENT HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS FOR 1-YEAR, 24-HOUR STORM EVENT SN03 S/ 03 A1 � P1 (D� Offsite of #r PWnd I \ \\ 1 \ DASI i \ \ Dumpster Area CB4 2 I \ W3 � 1 1 Catch Basin #4 Lot 2 ED W land \ Lot 3 Wetland 1 \ CB I 1 MH8 i Drai Manhole #8 cs ce CB11 MH9 DA4------D FRp------p 1 P Lot 2 Rooftop Roof Drain DMH#10 S4 Reach on [Link Catch Tin #11 Drain M Whole #9 DA2 ODA3 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type // 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment DA1: Offsite Runoff Area =512,084 sf 1.12% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.47" Flow Length=1,160' Tc=53.2 min CN=78 Runoff=3.17 cfs 0.461 of Subcatchment DA2: Lot 2 Runoff Area=106,089 sf 68.79% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.23" Flow Length=280' Tc=5.4 min CN=92 Runoff=5.59 cfs 0.251 of Subcatchment DA3: Lot 3 Runoff Area=210,820 sf 50.71% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.01" Flow Length=1,314' Tc=46.1 min CN=89 Runoff=3.46 cfs 0.408 of Subcatchment DA4: Lot 2 Rooftop Runoff Area=18,152 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.75" Flow Length=40' Slope=0.0100 '/' Tc=0.9 min CN=98 Runoff=1.36 cfs 0.061 of Subcatchment DA5: Dumpster Area Runoff Area=6,644 sf 59.33% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.16" Flow Length=98' Tc=3.0 min CN=91 Runoff=0.36 cfs 0.015 of Reach RD: Roof Drain Avg. Depth=0.42' Max Vet=4.29 fps Inflow=1.36 cfs 0.061 of D=12.0" n=0.009 L=20.0' S=0.0050 T Capacity=3.64 cfs Outflow=1.34 cfs 0.061 of Reach SN03: S/N003 Pond 1 P: DMH#10 Inflow=0.22 cfs 0.040 of Outflow=0.22 cfs 0.040 of Peak Elev=336.11' Inflow=1.34 cfs 0.061 of 12.0" x 80.0' Culvert Outflow=1.34 cfs 0.061 of Pond CB11: Catch Basin #11 Peak EIev=335.30' Inflow=5.59 cfs 0.251 of Primary=4.98 cfs 0.245 of Secondary=0.61 cfs 0.006 of Outflow=5.59 cfs 0.251 of Pond CB4: Catch Basin #4 Peak EIev=334.84' Inflow=0.36 cfs 0.015 of 12.0" x 70.0' Culvert Outflow=0.36 cfs 0.015 of Pond DMH8: Drain Manhole #8 Peak EIev=334.72' Inflow=1.67 cfs 0.075 of 12.0" x 57.0' Culvert Outflow=1.67 cfs 0.075 of Pond DMH9: Drain Manhole #9 Peak EIev=337.13' Inflow=3.46 cfs 0.408 of Primary=3.06 cfs 0.393 of Secondary=0.40 cfs 0.014 of Outflow=3.46 cfs 0.408 of Pond P1: Lot #1 Pond 3 Peak EIev=333.06' Storage=48,723 cf Inflow=4.90 cfs 1.160 of Outflow=0.22 cfs 0.040 of Pond W2: Lot 2 ED Wetland Peak EIev=334.84' Storage=11,213 cf Inflow=6.36 cfs 0.320 of Primary=0.78 cfs 0.311 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.78 cfs 0.311 of Pond W3: Lot 3 ED Wetland Peak EIev=336.84' Storage=15,367 cf Inflow=3.06 cfs 0.393 of Primary=0.78 cfs 0.368 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.78 cfs 0.368 of Total Runoff Area = 19.600 ac Runoff Volume = 1.195 of Average Runoff Depth = 0.73" 75.67% Pervious = 14.832 ac 24.33% Impervious = 4.769 ac Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 11 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Subcatchment DA1: Offsite Runoff = 3.17 cfs @ 12.60 hrs, Volume= 0.461 af, Depth> 0.47" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Area (sf) CN Description 506,352 78 Meadow, non -grazed, HSG D 5,732 98 Impervious 512,084 78 Weighted Average 506,352 Pervious Area 5,732 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 18.9 100 0.0150 0.09 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 1.9 100 0.0150 0.86 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt2 Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 32.4 960 0.0170 0.49 0.66 Parabolic Channel, Tt3 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.035 Earth, dense weeds 53.2 1,160 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA2: Lot 2 Runoff = 5.59 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.251 af, Depth> 1.23" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Area (sf) CN Description 33,111 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 72,978 98 Impervious 106,089 92 Weighted Average 33,111 Pervious Area 72,978 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 3.7 44 0.1700 0.20 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.6 56 0.0450 1.44 Sheet Flow, Tt2 Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 0.4 100 0.0375 3.93 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt3 Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 0.7 80 0.0310 1.80 2.40 Parabolic Channel, Tt4 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.013 Asphalt, smooth Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type // 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 5.4 280 Total Summary for Subcatchment DAI Lot 3 Runoff = 3.46 cfs @ 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.408 af, Depth> 1.01" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Area (sf) CN Description 103,905 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 106,915 98 Impervious 210,820 89 Weighted Average 103,905 Pervious Area 106,915 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 29.3 100 0.0050 0.06 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 3.4 100 0.0050 0.49 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt2 Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 9.3 175 0.0050 0.31 0.42 Parabolic Channel, Tt3 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.030 Earth, grassed & winding 1.9 161 0.0200 1.44 1.92 Parabolic Channel, Tt4 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.013 Asphalt, smooth 1.2 328 0.0050 4.63 3.64 Circular Channel (pipe), TO Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r= 0.25' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 0.4 172 0.0100 6.55 5.15 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt6 Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r= 0.25' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 0.0 18 0.0270 10.77 8.46 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt7 Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r= 0.25' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 0.6 260 0.0090 7.21 8.85 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt8 Diam= 15.0" Area= 1.2 sf Perim= 3.9' r= 0.31' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 46.1 1,314 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA4: Lot 2 Rooftop Runoff = 1.36 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.061 af, Depth> 1.75" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type 11 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type // 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Area (sf) CN Description 18,152 98 Impervious 18,152 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.9 40 0.0100 0.74 Sheet Flow, TO Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" Summary for Subcatchment DA5: Dumpster Area Runoff = 0.36 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.015 af, Depth> 1.16" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Area (sf) CN Description 2,702 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 3,942 98 Imoervious 6,644 91 Weighted Average 2,702 Pervious Area 3,942 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.2 25 0.2000 0.19 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.8 73 0.0400 1.44 Sheet Flow, Tt2 Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 3.0 98 Total Summary for Reach RD: Roof Drain Inflow Area = 0.417 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.75" for 1-Year event Inflow = 1.36 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.061 of Outflow = 1.34 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.061 af, Atten= 1 %, Lag= 0.1 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 4.29 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.1 min Avg. Velocity = 1.38 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.2 min Peak Storage= 6 cf @ 11.90 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.42' Bank -Full Depth= 1.00', Capacity at Bank -Full= 3.64 cfs 12.0" Diameter Pipe, n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Length= 20.0' Slope= 0.0050 7' Inlet Invert= 335.60', Outlet Invert= 335.50' Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 11 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Reach SN03: S/N003 Inflow Area = 19.600 ac, 24.33% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.02" for 1-Year event Inflow = 0.22 cfs @ 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.040 of Outflow = 0.22 cfs @ 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.040 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Summary for Pond 1 P: DMH#10 Inflow Area = 0.417 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.75" for 1-Year event Inflow = 1.34 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.061 of Outflow = 1.34 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.061 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 1.34 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.061 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 336.11' @ 11.90 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 335.40' 12.0" x 80.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.00' S= 0.0175 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior PrimaryOutFlow Max=1.33 cfs @ 11.90 hrs HW=336.10' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 1.33 cfs @ 2.25 fps) Summary for Pond CB11: Catch Basin #11 Inflow Area = 2.435 ac, 68.79% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.23" for 1-Year event Inflow = 5.59 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.251 of Outflow = 5.59 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.251 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 4.98 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.245 of Secondary = 0.61 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 335.30' @ 11.96 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 334.00' 18.0" x 15.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 333.50' S= 0.0333 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Secondary 334.85' 12.0" x 165.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 333.05' S= 0.0109 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 11 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2. 10 " Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Primary OutFlow Max=4.89 cfs @ 11.96 hrs HW=335.28' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 4.89 cfs @ 3.04 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.57 cfs @ 11.96 hrs HW=335.28' (Free Discharge) 't2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.57 cfs @ 1.77 fps) Summary for Pond CB4: Catch Basin #4 Inflow Area = 0.153 ac, 59.33% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.16" for 1-Year event Inflow = 0.36 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.015 of Outflow = 0.36 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.015 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.36 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.015 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 334.84' @ 11.93 hrs Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 334.50' 12.0" x 70.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.00' S= 0.0071 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=0.34 cfs @ 11.94 hrs HW=334.83' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.34 cfs @ 1.54 fps) Summary for Pond DMH8: Drain Manhole #8 Inflow Area = 0.569 ac, 89.10% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.59" for 1-Year event Inflow = 1.67 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.075 of Outflow = 1.67 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.075 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 1.67 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.075 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 334.72' @ 11.90 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 333.90' 12.0" x 57.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 333.50' S= 0.0070 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=1.65 cfs @ 11.90 hrs HW=334.71' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 1.65 cfs @ 2.42 fps) Summary for Pond DMH9: Drain Manhole #9 Inflow Area = 4.840 ac, 50.71 % Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.01" for 1-Year event Inflow = 3.46 cfs @ 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.408 of Outflow = 3.46 cfs @ 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.408 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 3.06 cfs @ 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.393 of Secondary = 0.40 cfs @ 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.014 of Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type // 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2. 10 " Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 337.13' @ 12.45 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 336.07' 18.0" x 20.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 336.00' S= 0.0035 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Secondary 336.77' 12.0" x 320.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.80' S= 0.0062 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=3.06 cfs @ 12.45 hrs HW=337.13' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 3.06 cfs @ 3.23 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.40 cfs @ 12.45 hrs HW=337.13' (Free Discharge) L2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.40 cfs @ 1.61 fps) Summary for Pond P1: Lot #1 Pond 3 Inflow Area = 19.600 ac, 24.33% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.71" for 1-Year event Inflow = 4.90 cfs @ 12.58 hrs, Volume= 1.160 of Outflow = 0.22 cfs @ 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.040 af, Atten= 96%, Lag= 445.2 min Primary = 0.22 cfs @ 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.040 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 333.06' @ 20.00 hrs Surf.Area= 49,721 sf Storage= 48,723 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 342.9 min calculated for 0.040 of (3% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 128.0 min ( 1,000.4 - 872.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 330.50' 113,145 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 330.50 100 0 0 331.00 2,240 585 585 332.00 20,400 11,320 11,905 333.00 47,200 33,800 45,705 334.00 87,680 67,440 113,145 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 330.58' 21.0" x 130.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.600 Outlet Invert= 330.01' S= 0.0044 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean #2 Device 1 330.58' 1.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 333.00' 4.0' long x 0.7' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 Coef. (English) 2.76 2.82 2.93 3.09 3.18 3.22 3.27 3.30 3.32 3.31 3.32 Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type // 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Primary OutFlow Max=0.21 cfs @ 20.00 hrs HW=333.06' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Passes 0.21 cfs of 11.71 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.04 cfs @ 7.52 fps) 3=Broad-C rested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 0.17 cfs @ 0.69 fps) Summary for Pond W2: Lot 2 ED Wetland Inflow Area = 3.005 ac, 72.64% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.28" for 1-Year event Inflow = 6.36 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.320 of Outflow = 0.78 cfs @ 12.33 hrs, Volume= 0.311 af, Atten= 88%, Lag= 23.0 min Primary = 0.78 cfs @ 12.33 hrs, Volume= 0.311 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Starting Elev= 333.50' Surf.Area= 3,388 sf Storage= 4,808 cf Peak Elev= 334.84' @ 12.33 hrs Surf.Area= 6,440 sf Storage= 11,213 cf (6,405 cf above start) Plug -Flow detention time= 230.5 min calculated for 0.200 of (62% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 85.0 min ( 851.1 - 766.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 329.50' 20,146 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 329.50 35 0 0 330.00 146 45 45 331.00 583 365 410 332.00 1,379 981 1,391 333.00 2,508 1,944 3,334 334.00 4,268 3,388 6,722 335.00 6,857 5,563 12,285 336.00 8,865 7,861 20,146 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 333.25' 12.0" x 25.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.600 Outlet Invert= 333.15' S= 0.0040 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Device 1 333.50' 3.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate X 3.00 C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 335.00' 13.9" Horiz. Orifice/Grate Limited to weir flow C= 0.600 #4 Secondary 335.50' 10.0' long x 4.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.38 2.54 2.69 2.68 2.67 2.67 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.68 2.72 2.73 2.76 2.79 2.88 3.07 3.32 Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 11 24-hr 1-Year Rainfal1=2.10" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Primary OutFlow Max=0.78 cfs @ 12.33 hrs HW=334.84' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Passes 0.78 cfs of 3.70 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifi ce/G rate (Orifice Controls 0.78 cfs @ 5.30 fps) 3=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=333.50' (Free Discharge) L4=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond W3: Lot 3 ED Wetland Inflow Area = 4.840 ac, 50.71% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.97" for 1-Year event Inflow = 3.06 cfs @ 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.393 of Outflow = 0.78 cfs @ 13.44 hrs, Volume= 0.368 af, Atten= 74%, Lag= 59.7 min Primary = 0.78 cfs @ 13.44 hrs, Volume= 0.368 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Starting Elev= 335.50' Surf.Area= 4,624 sf Storage= 7,613 cf Peak Elev= 336.84' @ 13.44 hrs Surf.Area= 6,916 sf Storage= 15,367 cf (7,754 cf above start) Plug -Flow detention time= 287.1 min calculated for 0.193 of (49% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 103.9 min ( 922.0 - 818.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 331.50' 24,513 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 331.50 112 0 0 332.00 447 140 140 333.00 1,064 756 895 334.00 2,226 1,645 2,540 335.00 3,738 2,982 5,522 336.00 5,509 4,624 10,146 338.00 8,858 14,367 24,513 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 335.35' 12.0" x 115.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.80' S= 0.0048 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Device 1 335.50' 3.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate X 3.00 C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 337.50' 13.9" Horiz. Orifice/Grate Limited to weir flow C= 0.600 #4 Secondary 338.00' 10.0' long x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type // 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Primary OutFlow Max=0.78 cfs @ 13.44 hrs HW=336.84' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Passes 0.78 cfs of 2.97 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.78 cfs @ 5.31 fps) 3=Orifice/G rate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=335.50' (Free Discharge) t-4=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) EXHIBIT 6: POST -DEVELOPMENT HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS FOR A 0.9" STORM EVENT WITH EXACT MODIFIED CURVE NUMBERS LSNO _]3 S/ 7 3 K. OffIsite of #A Pgnd D A 5i) Dumpster Area Catch Basin #4 ZLot 2 ED W land Lot 3 Wetland Drai Manhole #8 cB CB MH9 \DA [:RD] p p Catch sin #11 Drain Whole #9 Lot 2 Rooftop Roof Drain DMH#10 DA2 �DA3� Lot 2 Lot 3 S Cub c a)t Reachl on Link Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type // 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment DA1: Offsite Runoff Area=512,084 sf 1.12% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.03" Flow Length=1,160' Tc=53.2 min CN=78 Runoff=0.06 cfs 0.025 of Subcatchment DA2: Lot 2 Runoff Area=106,089 sf 30.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.57" Flow Length=280' Tc=5.4 min CN=97 Runoff=2.55 cfs 0.116 of Subcatchment DA3: Lot 3 Runoff Area=210,820 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.43" Flow Length=1,314' Tc=46.1 min CN=95 Runoff=1.49 cfs 0.175 of Subcatchment DA4: Lot 2 Rooftop Runoff Area=18,151 sf 30.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.57" Flow Length=40' Slope=0.0100 7' Tc=0.9 min CN=97 Runoff=0.49 cfs 0.020 of Subcatchment DA5: Dumpster Area Runoff Area=6,644 sf 30.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.57" Flow Length=98' Tc=3.0 min CN=97 Runoff=0.17 cfs 0.007 of Reach RD: Roof Drain Avg. Depth=0.25' Max Vet=3.23 fps Inflow=0.49 cfs 0.020 of D=12.0" n=0.009 L=20.0' S=0.0050 T Capacity=3.64 cfs Outflow=0.48 cfs 0.020 of Reach SN03: S/N003 Pond 1 P: DMH#10 Inflow=0.03 cfs 0.021 of Outflow=0.03 cfs 0.021 of Peak Elev=335.79' Inflow=0.48 cfs 0.020 of 12.0" x 80.0' Culvert Outflow=0.48 cfs 0.020 of Pond CB11: Catch Basin #11 Peak Elev=334.85' Inflow=2.55 cfs 0.116 of Primary=2.55 cfs 0.116 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=2.55 cfs 0.116 of Pond CB4: Catch Basin #4 Peak Elev=334.73' Inflow=0.17 cfs 0.007 of 12.0" x 70.0' Culvert Outflow=0.17 cfs 0.007 of Pond DMH8: Drain Manhole #8 Peak Elev=334.36' Inflow=0.64 cfs 0.027 of 12.0" x 57.0' Culvert Outflow=0.64 cfs 0.027 of Pond DMH9: Drain Manhole #9 Peak Elev=336.77' Inflow=1.49 cfs 0.175 of Primary=1.49 cfs 0.175 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=1.49 cfs 0.175 of Pond P1: Lot #1 Pond 3 Peak EIev=332.06' Storage=13,284 cf Inflow=0.99 cfs 0.326 of Outflow=0.03 cfs 0.021 of Pond W2: Lot 2 ED Wetland Peak EIev=334.19' Storage=7,584 cf Inflow=3.09 cfs 0.143 of Primary=0.53 cfs 0.137 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.53 cfs 0.137 of Pond W3: Lot 3 ED Wetland Peak EIev=336.11' Storage=10,759 cf Inflow=1.49 cfs 0.175 of Primary=0.49 cfs 0.164 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.49 cfs 0.164 of Total Runoff Area = 19.600 ac Runoff Volume = 0.344 of Average Runoff Depth = 0.21" 94.73% Pervious = 18.567 ac 5.27% Impervious = 1.033 ac Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Subcatchment DA1: Offsite Runoff = 0.06 cfs @ 13.40 hrs, Volume= 0.025 af, Depth> 0.03" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Area (sf) CN Description 506,352 78 Meadow, non -grazed, HSG D 5,732 98 Impervious 512,084 78 Weighted Average 506,352 Pervious Area 5,732 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 18.9 100 0.0150 0.09 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 1.9 100 0.0150 0.86 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt2 Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 32.4 960 0.0170 0.49 0.66 Parabolic Channel, Tt3 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.035 Earth, dense weeds 53.2 1,160 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA2: Lot 2 Runoff = 2.55 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.116 af, Depth> 0.57" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Area (sf) CN Description 74,262 97 MOD 31,827 98 MOD 106,089 97 Weighted Average 74,262 Pervious Area 31,827 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 3.7 44 0.1700 0.20 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.6 56 0.0450 1.44 Sheet Flow, Tt2 Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 0.4 100 0.0375 3.93 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt3 Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 0.7 80 0.0310 1.80 2.40 Parabolic Channel, Tt4 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.013 Asphalt, smooth Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 5.4 280 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA3: Lot 3 Runoff = 1.49 cfs @ 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.175 af, Depth> 0.43" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Area (sf) CN Description 84,328 94 MOD 126,492 95 MOD 210,820 95 Weighted Average 210,820 Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 29.3 100 0.0050 0.06 Sheet Flow, Ttl Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 3.4 100 0.0050 0.49 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt2 Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 9.3 175 0.0050 0.31 0.42 Parabolic Channel, Tt3 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.030 Earth, grassed & winding 1.9 161 0.0200 1.44 1.92 Parabolic Channel, Tt4 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.013 Asphalt, smooth 1.2 328 0.0050 4.63 3.64 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt5 Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r= 0.25' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 0.4 172 0.0100 6.55 5.15 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt6 Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r= 0.25' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 0.0 18 0.0270 10.77 8.46 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt7 Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r= 0.25' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 0.6 260 0.0090 7.21 8.85 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt8 Diam= 15.0" Area= 1.2 sf Perim= 3.9' r= 0.31' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 46.1 1,314 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA4: Lot 2 Rooftop Runoff = 0.49 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.020 af, Depth> 0.57" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type 11 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Area (sf) CN Description 12,706 97 MOD 5,445 98 MOD 18,151 97 Weighted Average 12,706 Pervious Area 5,445 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.9 40 0.0100 0.74 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" Summary for Subcatchment DA5: Dumpster Area Runoff = 0.17 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af, Depth> 0.57" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Area (sf) CN Description 4,651 97 MOD 1,993 98 MOD 6,644 97 Weighted Average 4,651 Pervious Area 1,993 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.2 25 0.2000 0.19 Sheet Flow, TO Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.8 73 0.0400 1.44 Sheet Flow, Tt2 Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 3.0 98 Total Summary for Reach RD: Roof Drain Inflow Area = 0.417 ac, 30.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.57" for WQv event Inflow = 0.49 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.020 of Outflow = 0.48 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.020 af, Atten= 1 %, Lag= 0.1 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 3.23 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.1 min Avg. Velocity = 0.95 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.4 min Peak Storage= 3 cf @ 11.90 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.25' Bank -Full Depth= 1.00', Capacity at Bank -Full= 3.64 cfs Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 12.0" Diameter Pipe, n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Length= 20.0' Slope= 0.0050 7' Inlet Invert= 335.60', Outlet Invert= 335.50' Summary for Reach SN03: S/N003 Inflow Area = 19.600 ac, 5.27% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.01" for WQv event Inflow = 0.03 cfs @ 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.021 of Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.021 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Summary for Pond 1 P: DMH#10 Inflow Area = 0.417 ac, 30.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.57" for WQv event Inflow = 0.48 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.020 of Outflow = 0.48 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.020 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.48 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.020 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 335.79' @ 11.90 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 335.40' 12.0" x 80.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.00' S= 0.0175 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=0.48 cfs @ 11.90 hrs HW=335.79' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.48 cfs @ 1.68 fps) Summary for Pond CB11: Catch Basin #11 Inflow Area = 2.435 ac, 30.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.57" for WQv event Inflow = 2.55 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.116 of Outflow = 2.55 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.116 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 2.55 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.116 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 334.85' @ 11.96 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 334.00' 18.0" x 15.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 333.50' S= 0.0333 7' Cc= 0.900 Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Secondary 334.85' 12.0" x 165.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 333.05' S= 0.0109 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=2.49 cfs @ 11.96 hrs HW=334.84' (Free Discharge) t-1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 2.49 cfs @ 2.46 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=334.00' (Free Discharge) t-2=Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond CB4: Catch Basin #4 Inflow Area = 0.153 ac, 30.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.57" for WQv event Inflow = 0.17 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.007 of Outflow = 0.17 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.17 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.007 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 334.73' @ 11.93 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 334.50' 12.0" x 70.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.00' S= 0.0071 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=0.16 cfs @ 11.93 hrs HW=334.72' (Free Discharge) t-1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.16 cfs @ 1.27 fps) Summary for Pond DMH8: Drain Manhole #8 Inflow Area = 0.569 ac, 30.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.57" for WQv event Inflow = 0.64 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.027 of Outflow = 0.64 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.027 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.64 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.027 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 334.36' @ 11.91 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 333.90' 12.0" x 57.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 333.50' S= 0.0070 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=0.63 cfs @ 11.91 hrs HW=334.35' (Free Discharge) t-1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.63 cfs @ 1.81 fps) Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Pond DMH9: Drain Manhole #9 Inflow Area = 4.840 ac, Inflow = 1.49 cfs @ Outflow = 1.49 cfs @ Primary = 1.49 cfs @ Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.43" 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.175 of 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.175 af, 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.175 of 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 336.77' @ 12.45 hrs for WQv event Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 336.07' 18.0" x 20.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 336.00' S= 0.0035 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Secondary 336.77' 12.0" x 320.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.80' S= 0.0062 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=1.49 cfs @ 12.45 hrs HW=336.77' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 1.49 cfs @ 2.71 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=336.07' (Free Discharge) L2=Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Inflow Area = 19.600 ac, Inflow = 0.99 cfs @ Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ Primary = 0.03 cfs @ Summary for Pond P1: Lot #1 Pond 3 5.27% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.20" 12.93 hrs, Volume= 0.326 of 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.021 af, 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.021 of for WQv event Atten= 97%, Lag= 424.4 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 332.06' @ 20.00 hrs Surf.Area= 22,138 sf Storage= 13,284 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 265.7 min calculated for 0.021 of (6% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 80.7 min ( 946.3 - 865.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 330.50' 113,145 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 330.50 100 0 0 331.00 2,240 585 585 332.00 20,400 11,320 11,905 333.00 47,200 33,800 45,705 334.00 87,680 67,440 113,145 Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 330.58' 21.0" x 130.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.600 Outlet Invert= 330.01' S= 0.0044 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean #2 Device 1 330.58' 1.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 333.00' 4.0' long x 0.7' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 Coef. (English) 2.76 2.82 2.93 3.09 3.18 3.22 3.27 3.30 3.32 3.31 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=0.03 cfs @ 20.00 hrs HW=332.06' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Passes 0.03 cfs of 7.01 cfs potential flow) T__3=Broad-Crested 2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.03 cfs @ 5.78 fps) Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond W2: Lot 2 ED Wetland Inflow Area = 3.005 ac, 30.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.57" for WQv event Inflow = 3.09 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.143 of Outflow = 0.53 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.137 af, Atten= 83%, Lag= 12.3 min Primary = 0.53 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.137 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Starting Elev= 333.50' Surf.Area= 3,388 sf Storage= 4,808 cf Peak Elev= 334.19' @ 12.15 hrs Surf.Area= 4,762 sf Storage= 7,584 cf (2,776 cf above start) Plug -Flow detention time= 386.9 min calculated for 0.027 of (19% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 59.7 min ( 825.3 - 765.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 329.50' 20,146 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 329.50 35 0 0 330.00 146 45 45 331.00 583 365 410 332.00 1,379 981 1,391 333.00 2,508 1,944 3,334 334.00 4,268 3,388 6,722 335.00 6,857 5,563 12,285 336.00 8,865 7,861 20,146 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 333.25' 12.0" x 25.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.600 Outlet Invert= 333.15' S= 0.0040 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Device 1 333.50' 3.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate X 3.00 C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 335.00' 13.9" Horiz. Orifice/Grate Limited to weir flow C= 0.600 Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type // 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 #4 Secondary 335.50' 10.0' long x 4.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.38 2.54 2.69 2.68 2.67 2.67 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.68 2.72 2.73 2.76 2.79 2.88 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=0.53 cfs @ 12.15 hrs HW=334.19' (Free Discharge) t-1=Culvert (Passes 0.53 cfs of 2.00 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifi ce/G rate (Orifice Controls 0.53 cfs @ 3.62 fps) 3=Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=333.50' (Free Discharge) t-4=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond W3: Lot 3 ED Wetland Inflow Area = 4.840 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.43" for WQv event Inflow = 1.49 cfs @ 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.175 of Outflow = 0.49 cfs @ 13.17 hrs, Volume= 0.164 af, Atten= 67%, Lag= 43.2 min Primary = 0.49 cfs @ 13.17 hrs, Volume= 0.164 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Starting Elev= 335.50' Surf.Area= 4,624 sf Storage= 7,613 cf Peak Elev= 336.11' @ 13.17 hrs Surf.Area= 5,692 sf Storage= 10,759 cf (3,147 cf above start) Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: initial storage excedes outflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 70.8 min ( 886.3 - 815.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 331.50' 24,513 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 331.50 112 0 0 332.00 447 140 140 333.00 1,064 756 895 334.00 2,226 1,645 2,540 335.00 3,738 2,982 5,522 336.00 5,509 4,624 10,146 338.00 8,858 14,367 24,513 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 335.35' 12.0" x 115.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.80' S= 0.0048 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Device 1 335.50' 3.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate X 3.00 C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 337.50' 13.9" Horiz. Orifice/Grate Limited to weir flow C= 0.600 #4 Secondary 338.00' 10.0' long x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Primary OutFlow Max=0.49 cfs @ 13.17 hrs HW=336.11' (Free Discharge) 't-1=Culvert (Passes 0.49 cfs of 1.50 cfs potential flow) N =Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.49 cfs @ 3.35 fps) =Orifice/Grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=335.50' (Free Discharge) L4=13road-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) EXHIBIT 7: PROJECT PLANS & DETAILS November 25, 2009 Josh Quinn 30 Community Drive, Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 124 Technology Park Way Dear Mr. Quinn: Enclosed, please find copies of the Findings of Fact and Decisions rendered by the Administrative Officer on November 24, 2009 (effective 11/24/09). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Jana Beagley Planning and Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 te1 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com Site Plan Application 4A, Permit Number SP- APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): 1a'-A Te_c\nno\". Rc.cle k_L-c,LLL,C 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): 3U Ccrnmuni �i,ye,\e ��N.t Diu\tna V"C �4�'_� F1n- 80a- Vc,X. %6a - 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax Q6,nYA 30 '?%- 8C�3-g�a-� Gx. goa-$c�3-is�3y a. Contact e-mail address: cny-noanla. c nrx 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: lay JCecanrnloc�.,, t�.r\� mac,.,, 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 13,.�'b - OC)\ apt 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Site Plan Application b. Existing Uses on Property (`includding description and size of each separate use): COmrn¢fGGSZ' �fF p u�1`ClinQ c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): no ccVjo n(-4 d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): ,n o cknnn14 e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): n6 &) f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non - office employees): y-,c�, h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 31q+gy-} Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing g.3 % / 1$, �e,,?, sq. ft. Proposed % / kcq, t53 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing`yy.s- % / % 9-71 sq. ft. Proposed yv.5 % / grp a, 1 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed Ic,, sq. ft. I• Site Plan Application d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 1 otcre.� c Q e4k%. * o vkA-%Qr1vnLW C(,P 3-9oao * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ LA-3 rnA\,tn b. Landscaping: $ 361, \q% c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): N c c_�,AcxNc,., 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): no ca-,LWCk Q b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): ilc-, c�r�Unc,, SZ c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): no �lncmc„A 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 9�n — 5 onn 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: McnAcu 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: �Q1 any 14. ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) Site Plan Application I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. L- S16NATURE OF APPLICANT SIGNATiU)RU OP -MO ERTY OWNER \ 1 PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I I & /61 REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board �inistrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete / / / ❑ Incomplete i i ofi Plarthing & Zoning or Designee 5 Green Mountain Power Corporation W. W. Grainger, Inc. I.C.V. 163 Acorn Lane 100 Grainger Parkway 30 Main Street #401 Colchester, VT 05446 Lake Forest, IL. 60045 Burlington, VT 05401 Pizzagalli Properties, LLC Burlington Properties, LTD Green Acres, Inc. 50 Joy Drive P. O. Box 9210 P. O. Box 2123 So. Burlington, VT 05403 So. Burlington, VT 05403 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Chelsea Communications Ruby B. Willis Family Trust Richard T. Willis Trust B 106 Kimball Avenue c/o 120 Kimball Avenue, LLC c/o 120 Kimball Avenue, LLC So. Burlington, VT 05403 159 Industrial Parkway 159 Industrial Parkway Burlington, VT 05401 Burlington, VT 05401 Edlund Company, Inc. O'Brien Family Limited Partnership 102 Kimball Avenue Unit 2, LLP 159 Industrial Parkway P.O. Box 2184 102 Kimball Avenue, Unit 2 Burlington, VT 05401 So. Burlington, VT 05403 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Bimn Holdings, LLC Jean Poulin Grandchildren Realty, Inc. 102 Kimball Avenue, Unit 4 1237 Flora Vista Street 343 Pecks Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Trinity FL 34655 Pittsfield, MA 01201 Catamount/Woodlands, LLC Alan Levi Warren and Mary Lahue 210 College Street, Suite 201 310 Hanon Drive 3097 Williston Road Burlington, VT 05401 Williston, VT 05495 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Lawrence Press Chadwick M. Shepard Forest Park Realty 102 Kimball Avenue, Suite 318 102 Aspen Lane P.O. Box 2184 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Williston, VT 05495 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Williston Distribution Center LNP, Inc. Washburn, Christopher and Suzanne 75 Boyer Circle 300 Cornerstone Drive, Suite 130 204 Boyer Circle Williston, VT 05495 Williston, VT 05495 Williston, VT 05495 Riggs Properties Route 2 Box 4661 Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 I I I I �I i I II I I I I i r + r vi �. 2-N 3M - -- 24N'` D. oLn>ER NORTHERN \ �' • .REGION WILDFLOWER MIX _ — \.\ A. \\. H f it t + �l ,-PS i ecnnoiogy rarK South Burlington, VT Lot # 2 OWNER: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)880-1691 Fax (802)860-1695 DESIGN BUILDER: ReArch Company 30 Community Drive Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)883-8727 Fax: (802)863-8734 ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne, VT 05482 Phone:(802)985-5595 Fax: (802)985-5565 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC 125 Main Street Reading, MA 01867 Phone:(781)670-9990 _ .,\ .\ �\ ------ - ------ -- -- - Fax: (781)870-9939 n -- --- 14-FR _. —2-PG - _ _._ Y.' CIVIL ENGINEER* I —sys \ � ' \ \ \ -- _-, _ J '`. Trudell Counsulting Engineers — — — \ 1. ' 478 Blair Park Road 24eR t-rv'\�\�� I I i� P.O. Box 308 -2-BR ,, s , � I Williston, VT 05495 t 1a1IJ F axne:(802)879.8 60 Pho 331 2CR (802)879- �11-cs -1-AR LANDSCAPE IARCHITECT 1-AR \ 1-AF 1,AF \_ 7 R it .� \ \ ..,� �,` �.., \ - 4- -- --- - SE Group =+ J r .9P .`, 2"3P 131 Church Street 1- I _ \. \ \\ \\ - { Burlington, VT 05401 - - -- I -AR 1-AR I \ ---- V. \ A . I hone:(802)862-0098 ---- -- Fax: (802)865-2440+ 1-AF -- __ p MECHANICAL ENGINEER: k I I \k \_ \� I•• I�New England Air Systems Inc. + --- 1 3-CR V.� ` � '-.I I P.O. Box.525 HSAF V A 43 Krupp Drive ;� Williston VT 05495 9 + .. 1 I _ \ \ \ �\ I Phone:(802)864-3800 3-AC \ i I Fax: (802)864-3904 3•CR \.�V A\ \v I ELECTRICAL ENGINEER_ ----------\ \ Omega Electric mega Drive Williston, VT 05495 6dP Phone:(802)882-0517 Fex: (802)862-4349 FIRE PROTECTION: I � � 4cR I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I 1 k \ t North Country Fire Protection \ P.O. Box 2004 VT 05448 ne: ®8._. .. I Fax�) 802878-2188 i I + DATE: 10y 2007 2-AC I I .__ 3cR - 3-AR I I i 2-AC .- -. .. -._ ��,. - �. _ - � • REVISIONS o. Date 5-PN 3-PS l 3 10 27 09 11/21/08 � 1 Y --- -- -- -- - - ..l Y '•s - - - .1 Planting Plan __- - - - - Lild 1.0 --i-P. AGI DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 NOVEMBER 2008 Site Plan Application #SP-08-101 of 124 Technology Park Way, LLC, to amend a previously approved plan for a 54,459 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of expanding the dumpster storage area and associated maneuvering space, 124 Technology Park Way: Mr. Gallo showed the area where the dumpsters were approved outside the wetland buffer. The tenant wants to add a recycling dumpster within the buffer. The area will be paved and will drain away from the wetland. They also want to add a turn -around area for trucks to service the dumpster. Pavement has been reduced in another area. Drainage from the turnaround will not go directly into the wetland buffer. In addition, the Green Mountain Power vault approved for lot #3 has been moved back behind the front face of the building. Mr. Belair said the applicant will have to submit a new landscaping plan. Mr. Farley moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-08-101 of Technology Park Way, LLC, subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Plumeau seconded. Motion passed 4-0. 9. Continued Final Plat Application #SD-08-34 of Dorset Street Associates & G&A Associates, LLC, to amend a planned unit development consisting of 149 residential units. The amendment consists of. 1) adding 30 acres to the project area, 2) constructing 79 single family dwellings, and 3) constructing 30 multi -family dwelling units, 1530 Dorset Street (Chittenden Cider Mill): Mr. Belair said staff had worked with the applicant on traffic issues. Mr. Llewellyn said the applicant will pay a percentage of the required improvements. Mr. Belair noted that intersection improvements would be needed when the applicant builds the 261h house. Members agreed to modify the approve motion as follows: Stipulation #25 would add language to indicate that prior to the construction of the 261h unit, the City shall assess the developer at a maximum of 36% of the cost of the Vermont 116/Cheese Factory Road intersection improvements. Stipulation 426 was revised to have the first sentence begin: The developer shall conduct turning movement counts at the Vermont Rt. 116/Nadeaucrest Street intersection. Regarding the issue of the Jewett area right-of-way, Mr. Llewellyn advised that the right-of-way has been reduced to 50 feet with a 10-foot pedestrian easement beside it. There is also a 20-foot path easement along the applicant's property line all the way to the Auclair property. Members did not feel the road should be constructed all the way to the property line as they didn't want all that pavement for a road that may never be completed. SIE { soutmy"lilit'eU1,14 December 4, 2008 Bob Gallo Trudell Consulting Engineers PO Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Re: Minutes — 124 Technology Park Way Dear Mr. Gallo: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved November 18, 2008 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Darsot Strut S.auth 8=terhng1a-n, Yr 05462 led 8Q2A4C*tfld fax 801.848A I �%, w w,sbuH,ce m �T TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) tel: 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudeliconsulting.com 124 Technology Park Way, LLC (Technology Park Lot 2) Abutters List Edlund Company, Inc. 159 Industrial Parkway Burlington, VT 05401 Ruby B. Willis Family Trust c/o 120 Kimball Avenue, LLC 159 Industrial Parkway Burlington, VT 05401 I.C.V. 30 Main Street #401 Burlington, VT 05401 P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Civil Engineering, Surveying, Land Planning, Water and Wastewater, Landscape Architecture. Roadway Design, Permitting November 6, 2008 124 Technology Park Way, LLC 30 Community Drive, Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 124 Technology Park Way Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is the draft agenda for the November 18, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, "-& b N Betsy *McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. cc: Bob Gallo Ada r�u. ;t kre 1: 5' Es - rlaargk.u�xt, 'T t55 a3 Aa1 802- 41,0:IH fax. 802-:46-41fiI wr.4 W.,Sb ara.c e to November 6, 2008 Edlund Company, Inc. c/o Stephen Foster, Registered Agent 159 Industrial Parkway Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the November 18, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburi.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, &J� etsy Mc onough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Stru&t SaulbBurlington, kF tl5483 tel 252_846.4fDO fix. 802-946.4101 WWWa zhurVcom November 6, 2008 Ruby B. Willis Family Trust c/o 120 Kimball Avenue, LLC 159 Industrial Parkway Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the November 18, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, '—P :�� &Wk-, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 676 Dar!set Strait South Rarlington. Wr 054t+3 tal E82_846.0fld fax 8112_a4a.4101 vvwf_Shurl.aam November 6, 2008 ICV 30 Main Street, #401 Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda for the November 18, 2008 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding sha►I consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, ' b� aok�,� Betsy Mc onough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Strict. South 3}-urltxayton, MT 06403 tel 002_846AV08 fax a CU.04. ,4101 www.zhurE_cmrti CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: November 13, 2008 \drb\sub\TechPark\siteplan2_kim ballAveLot.doc Plans received: October 20, 2008 Technology Park SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-08-109 Agenda #8 Meeting Date- November 18, 2008 Owner Technology Park Associates Inc. Axinn Vermont Inc PMF Energy INC 30 Community Drive S. Burlington VT 05407 Engineer/Surveyor Jennifer A. Desautels Trudell Consulting Engineers PO Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Location Map Property Information Tax Parcel 0436-00030 Volume 388, Page 117 Mixed Industrial/Commercial District 177.2 acres CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\tech ark\site lan2 Kimball Avedoc Technology Park Way, LLC, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting site plan review to amend a previously approved plan for a 54,459 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of expanding the dumpster storage area and associated maneuvering space, 124 Technology Park Way. The applicant received site plan approval on October 4, 2007 for the building. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on October 20, 2008 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional Re u. rmar2ts ICZoning District Re uired/Limit Pro osed Size 40,000 SF 5.0 acres ldin Covera e 40% 8.3% Max. Overall Coverage Min. Front Setback Max Front Yard Coverage 70% 30 ft. 30% 42% Approx 400 ft 16.3% �l Min. Side Setback IL 10 ft. F25 ft Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. Approx 55 ft + Maximum BuildingHeight (flat roof) 50 ft + Waiver Required The Board previously granted a height waiver of 15 feet. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlin ton Land Development Re ulations subdivisions should comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system should be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. The South Burlington Water Department Superintendent has reviewed the previous set of site plans. His conditions were met prior to issuance of the zoning permit for the building. The new proposed changes do not affect those comments or the site's compliance with those comments. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\tech ark\site lan2 Kimball Avedoc The Water Department has stated that they are comfortable with these plans and recommend no additional changes so far as the water lines are concerned. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer should connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. The City Engineer has reviewed the previous set of site plans. His conditions were met prior to issuance of the zoning permit for the building. The new proposed changes do not affect those comments or the site's compliance with those comments. He has stated that he is comfortable with these plans and recommends no additional changes. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The proposed project involves additional construction and as such shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan should meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The South Burlington Stormwater Superintendent shall visit the site as construction progresses to ensure compliance with this criterion. I. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan should meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The South Burlington Stormwater Superintendent shall visit the site as construction progresses to ensure compliance with this criterion. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. The existing access to the building is via a 26' wide private access road (Technology Park Way) that connects to the eastern leg of Community Drive. This road is accompanied to the south by a five (5) foot wide concrete sidewalk. The private road shall remain private. Legal documents (in the form of a private road agreement) have been submitted, reviewed, and recorded to ensure that this is the case. Staff does not have any concerns regarding the circulation or traffic management. However, the applicant has since become aware that there are potential conflicts with the configuration of the dumpster area. The attached letter articulates these concerns. Staff supports the proposed changes. There are no changes to the estimated traffic volumes as a result of this proposal. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The plans that the applicant submitted depict a significant amount of wetlands on the subject property. The applicant is proposing to encroach into a delineated Class 11 wetland buffer. The CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\tech arklsite lan2 Kimball Avedoc applicant has submitted a Conditional Use Determination which was issued from the State in 2003 and subsequently re -approved several times, most recently for the period from March 26, 2006 to April 12, 2009, for a previously proposed building. The applicant has stated that the degree of wetland and buffer impact is no greater than was originally granted in the CUD. The applicant has located the dumpster facility out of the wetland buffer, and is proposing significant vegetative screening to delineate the wetland buffer. Staff is pleased with the proposed plan and finds that this criterion is being met to the best ability of the applicant. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Staff feels that the proposed project is in keeping with the planned development patterns of the IC Zoning District. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. Major portions of the PUD are undevelopable due to wetland constraints. These undevelopable areas will serve as open spaces between adjoining parcels. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The South Burlington Fire Chief has reviewed the previous set of site plans. His conditions were met prior to issuance of the zoning permit for the building. The new proposed changes do not adversely affect those comments or the site's compliance with those comments. The revision to the dumpster location only serves to increase maneuverability. Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. There are no changes to this criterion as a result of this application. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. The applicant is proposing to locate a transformer with concrete pad on the site. This is behind the main line of the building and largely out of view. Staff has no concerns regarding this proposal. 2. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications should be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed development of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING ldrb\sub\tech ark\siteplan2 Kimball Avedoc Landscaping The applicant previously submitted a landscaping plan. There are no changes to this plan as a result of this application. Pursuant to Section 13.06(A) of the Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to site plan and PUD review. Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations requires parking facilities to be curbed and landscaped with appropriate trees, shrubs, and other plants including ground covers. Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(4) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas must be shown on the plans. Snow storage areas are shown on the plans and have been deemed to be satisfactory by the Stormwater Superintendent. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site Plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is appropriately located on the plans. Pursuant to Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed 54,459 square feet of general office use will require 191 parking spaces, including 6 handicapped -accessible parking spaces. The plans depict 191 parking spaces, including 6 handicapped -accessible. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The applicant is proposing to locate all 191 parking spaces to the front of the building. This is not in compliance with the regulations. The applicant argues that the location of the power lines and related easement on the northern portion of the property makes it impossible to locate the building up front. Staff agrees that the location of the power lines makes this impractical. The Board discussed this issue at a previous hearing (minutes attached) and it was agreed that the parking could remain as proposed. The applicant is proposing significant landscaping- in terms of quantity and in monetary value- between Kimball Avenue and the parking lot. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The height of the proposed building is 50', which is over the 35' maximum height for flat roofs for the City. The Board previously granted a height waiver for this request. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\tech ark\site lan2 Kimball Avedoc Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant has submitted sufficient building elevations. The proposed building will be similar to the existing buildings in the subdivision. Staff finds it to be a very visually appealing building. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant has submitted sufficient building elevations. The proposed building will be similar to the existing buildings in the subdivision. Again, it appears to be a very aesthetically appealing building. In addition to the above general review standards site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff has already addressed the issue of the proposed access to the property Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans depict a proposed enclosed dumpster at the west side of the building, located outside of the Class II wetland buffer. Lighting Pursuant to Appendix A.9 of the Land Development Regulations, luminaries shall not be placed more than 30' above ground level and the maximum illumination at ground level shall not exceed an average of three (3) foot candles. Pursuant to Appendix A.10(b) of the Land Development Regulations, indirect glare produced by illumination at ground level shall not exceed 0.3 foot candles maximum, and an average of 0.1 foot candles average. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\tech ark\site lan2 Kimball Avedoc All lighting shall be shielded and downcast. The applicant has submitted a lighting point by point plan and lighting cut sheets which are appropriate and meet the guidelines of the SBLDR (the cut sheets are somewhat vague in this matter; however, the applicant's engineer has submitted a memo which is acceptable to staff and which states that the lights are indeed shielded). Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Site Plan Application #SP-08-101 subject to the conditional numbered items included in the comments section of this report. Respectfully submitted, ,l Cathy La Rose, Associate Planner Copy to: John Illick, Technology Park Associates, applicant Bob Gallo, Trudell Consulting Engineers (7 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) October 17, 2008 City of South Burlington — Planning & Zoning AttrL Ray Beaair 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Technology Park Lot 2 —124 Technology Paris Way Dear Ray: tel: 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudeliconsulting.com Enclosed are a site plan application and set of plans for an amendment to the Lot 2 site plan at Technology Park The amendment involves the redesign of the service area on the West side of the building, and the relocation of a Green Mountain Power transformer vault from Lot 3 to Lot 2 (behind the front line of the building). The applicant is proposing to adjust the previously approved screened dumpster area to allow for the placement of a recycled materials receptacle so the facility manager can implement a recycling program for the building. The previously approved small vehicle turnaround was reconfigured to accommodate the larger front load durrrpster trucks that are commonly utilized for pickups. The turnaround was reconfigured so the trucks can make a turn and then leave the service area in a forward direction, rather than backing the truck past the building entrance (a potentially hazardous pedestrian situation considering the projected occupancy of the building). The "trash" dumpster that was previously approved will remain outside of the wetlands buffer as originally planned. Adding the second receptacle for recycling will allow the area to more adequately handle refuse from the building by providing ample storage room Furthermore, the service and turnaround areas are proposed with curbing, and both areas are graded to drain to the stormwater treatment system to prevent runoff from entering the buffer and wetland area without treatment. Minor adjustments to the grading and the reconfiguration of the paved areas have resulted in a 706 sf reduction in wetland buffer disturbance, from to 19,067 sf to 18,361 s£ In light of the previous issues regarding the GMP vaults and cabinets in the front yards of buildings, the vault for the project has been relocated from Lot 3 to Lot 2, behind the front face of the building. Additionally, there is no building proposed on Lot 3 at this time, and the cabinet would have been the first structure on the lot. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the enclosed materials. I can be reached at (802) 879-6331. Very truly yours, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) Bob Gallo �-�C•• Project Manager Encl. site plan application, sheet SP2 & SP2A, $186 application fee CC. Josh Quinn - ReArch 101708L ot2SubmittalCover.doc P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Civil Engineering, Surveying, Land Planning, Water and Wastewater, Landscape Architecture. Roadway Design, Permitting )DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD' 2 OCTOBER 2007 �241 TP wcuq Mr. Bresee asked if the rec path across the front will become an easement to the city. Mr. Matosky said it will. The alignment has been created, and the easement has been granted to the city and recorded. Mr. Cimonetti noted that the Rec Path Committee hasn't seen that alignment yet. He questioned what will happen at either end of the path. Mr. Matosky said that will be part of the next application. Mr. Belair questioned the absence of a signature on the mylar. Mr. Matosky said it has been signed by the surveyor. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Preliminary Plat Application #SD-07-61 and Final Plat Application #SD-07-62 of Technology Park Partners subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. 9.17,,,ite Plan Application #SP-07-67 of Technology Park Partners for a 54,459 sq. . general office building, Community Drive: Mr. Matosky noted this is lot #2 of the subdivision. They have addressed concerns raised previously. This includes pulling the building back as much as possible within the buffer area and delineating the .wetland with plantings. They have also increased the percentage of evergreens to screen the parking area in winter. Ms. Quimby asked why the building can't be closer to Kimball Ave. Mr. Matosky said there are large powerlines involved. Mr. Matosky also noted that the dumpster has been moved out of the buffer and sheetflow drainage has been directed away from the wetland. They will construct 2 drainage "wetland" areas for stormwater, and roof drainage will also go through the treatment system. The attorney is reviewing the private road agreement. They have added a sidewalk and have extended the sidewalk from the east side of the building. Mr. Bresee noted that there has been a provision that the bike path be substantially completed (can be ridden on) before a CO is issued. Plantings can be added when weather permits. Mr. Matosky showed the plan for either end of the bike path. Ms. Quimby asked if there will be another layer of asphalt put down. Mr. Matosky said there will. Ms. Quimby also noted that some cones have disappeared and the change in grade is quite dangerous, even for bicyclists. Mr. Matosky said they will look into that. Mr. Cimonetti asked why the rec path isn't being completed to the end of the property. Mr. Matosky said they will extend the gravel to the end of the property, but they felt it 7- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOAR 2 OCTOBER 2007 was safer to put the path onto the road at the existing curb cut. Mr. Cimonetti cited the problem throughout the city of "missing links" in the bike path that the city ultimately has to complete. Mr. Bresee questioned the thickness of asphalt on the bike path. Mr. Matosky said their intention is to have a uniform thickness throughout. The draft motion was amended to add a new # 17 requiring the Kimball Avenue Rec Path to be completed within 6 months after the date of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the building. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SD-07-67 of Technology Park Partners subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 18. Continued Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat Application #SD-07-51 of Technology Park Partners to subdivide 177.2 acres into 16 lots ranging in size from 3.98 acres to 29.76 acres, 30 Community Drive: Mr. Matosky said the have added more detail to the plans. Mr. Behr raised the issue of the rec path from Kimball Ave. to Tilley Drive.. Mr. Cimonetti said the Committee feels there should be a connection between the new path on Tilley Dr. out to Kimball Ave. Public Works is in the process of reviewing the design. They have said they feel the path should be asphalt as opposed to concrete to match with the adjoining parts of the path. Mr. Belair said he hasn't yet received a recommendation from Public Works. Mr. Matosky noted there are wetlands all along the loop and a wetland buffer, and they are trying to minimize the impact. He also noted they are providing 5-foot lanes on the road that a biker will be able to use. Mr. Bresee said he has heard that Public Works will want 12-foot lanes on the road instead of 11-foot. Mr. Matosky said they have been trying to address the needs of an endangered watershed and provide a safe shoulder. Mr. Cimonetti said that from the point of view of "alternative transportation," a 5-foot path is too narrow and concrete is not recommended. The question of building the road to the property line was raised. The applicant noted that there is a possibility that the road will have to be moved, and they don't want the city to have to tear it up. Mr. Belair said that having the bond in place is just as good as having the road built. The issue of an easement to access the "Whales Tails" was raised. Mr. Matosky said he was sure that is just a private access for maintenance. Ms. Quimby said she hoped that down the line the city doesn't have to put in the curbing that is not being put in now. -8- l OWNEER:PLA�124rYTTEECHNOLOGY PARK WAY. UC 4 /' ��•� 30 COMMUNITY DRIVE SLITF - I SOUTH SURLNMTON.VT 0403 =i -`.. J, PHONED (8I12)860 ZONE: MIXED INWSIRIAL/COMMEOYYERGAI A-W•' 1 V LOT 2. 5.0 AC PARCELj/,/ BUFFER I PACTWEILD 1 BUILDING SSE: $4.459 SF BUFFER IMPACT = 5,4626E '1 PARCEL A PARKING SPACE REOLVED: I ; (15 SPACES/f000 SF) K (54.459 SF) . 191 SPACES PARKING SPACES PRONOED: 191 PROPOSED (INCLUDING 6 fJ/"/,/ HANDICAPPED SPACES AND 9 SPACES FOR NEL EFFICIENT �1/ „End WRNS - 1 VEHICLES) (SX X 791 SPACES) : ! POND AREA —� NO DL4n1R61114LE LOT COVERAGE: I� \ yy PROPOSED: d BURRING 18,153 SF - a33X - DELINEATED ALL IMPROVEMENTS SF 71 96.9- 44. 5X WETLANDS FRONT YARD: 4225 SF - 16. 32X A II 60,650 SF OF PARKING LOT 6,347 SF OF ISLANDS IN PARKING LOT �' REINS 7 A13. SERVICE ' 9tC5 1 k 1J. SERVICE I �y LIGHTMG PLAN - SEE PLAN BY SE GROUP l AREA REVISED PER 1 -PLANTING MAN - SEE PLAN BY SE GROUP R-0 REQUEST ' I 1 : —CONNECTION DETAILS UPON APPLICATION TO UTILITIES — -BUILDING SETBACK LIMIT ME LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOMN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERWED BY ME OWNER OR ME ENGINEER TNII CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE ME EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFOREC�� COMMENCING WAN ORK. D AGREES 7O BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES Ni REVISION ARE wr , WHICH MIGHT BE OCCASIONED BY THE CONTRACTORS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. IT IS ME CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILIT - 6 1 TO CONTACT 'OG SAFE- AT I-BW-225-4977 TO LOCATE ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES �5 �, - I T BEFORE EXCAVATION BEGINS. THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY ME ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN UTILITIES AS SROMN AND AS FOUND UTILITY MUTE 7�� SEE SHEET SP2A 'UTILITY MAN' FOR UTILITY IDENnFICA TION AND LAYOUT SCREMD DIMPSffR t16.5• STOSETBACGr Ic Scale (TYPSF ( �\ CRETE PAOCONM FCet NANI 'p i\ `V 'f I C I \ IRAHSrOLYER 30 0 30 60 90 120 CONLRE LINT A , to 2 WEl'IAND BUFFER \\\ PAD\ll tIMPAR = ]B,361 SF I COILCAETE I 441' TYPE 1 a/RR ! aPaAP I } \1 I i 43REAR SETBACK '1 "J V'TP �� 'SERVICE VEHNSES OMEY-SIGN SNOW s7mw 1 I I 1 '•V AREA. TYPICAL tMar or asnMeAxcr a r / y PROPOSED CONCIPFIE sy JJe -tiErLLr To INCH, I I, ORA16N0 fOR / .5 1 i ' '------� srAws i I i •% �v I r 100' EASEMENT /0 a .C. x f3i p. MI JJS PROPOSED 3 STORY - OFFICE ISUQ.DRdG I I 4 a ,'" \ ELL 343.0 - 25' EASEMENT TO I PATIO uns S DE 7ECTA& '- NE3 h T 1J7 I r H MIAs 4 WARrMVG 7FX$ P. 88El 1 6u'OROP f64WB I'' i .b eue .21 '`\ I 26 ,:us ACCESSIBLE SPACE 11 TYP. OF 6 TBCEs 1 / II I d ® 313 A I a / Err I FO, PARKMO �G• 1 i PROPOSED SPOT FOP SKMVS FUEL EF ..., GRADE (TYMICAL) VEHICLES 9 ( 9 PROPOSED 5' T D SP CONCRETE LOr SK21 —•—+— P M ,`/ � SIDEWALKI 3'V PROPOSED GAS I I f• _• / - SERVICE ® I ' / 1 t3 I / s, I 3 �. rw _ 1 Ok WBI 51 ? 40' UTILITY Ito / \ EASE T y —Y. _ _ _ -- __-_ -- l PROPOSEDI TO' CONCRETE PROPOSED UR17V I i ®aDE161tK (TOM°. 1 SIDEWALK (a' THICK W/ CARNETS (SEE SHEET SP2A . \ 12- CRUSHED GRAVEL BASE far CABINET CnKA„ : JM 1 I / I H ■ ; EXISTINI: 20' 1 I - / : SEINER. EASEMENT ' 26' 160E ' 1 i/ I I ji ; I Access ONME .}, I Technology Park 1 -� PARCEL E South Burlington, VT V �, 1 1 i + ^ II' i �_�--•�---- - OWNER: ' 11 1 II'• •� 8 C - 124 Technology Park Way, LLC 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 l; 1 II•' Phone: (802)860-1691 Fax: (802)860.1695 I I II, 1 DESIGN BUILDER: j I If'• ! ReArch Company - j 30 Community Drive Suite 8 i I 329 w i PARCEL A South Burlington, VT 05403 j I( , I I Phone:(802)863.8727 h,DELINEATED Fax: (802)863.8734 Y CLASS I ' 9EILANo I / ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shelburne Rd. IIIp!;r Shelburne, VT 05482 1 • I I� % Phone:(802)985-5595 Fax: (802)985-5565 1 I j g ` �.•, %'e%� / STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC I ' ' - • „A I / ,AI ' 125 Main Street j EXISTING 2D• /�/ Reading, MA01867 I EASEMENT TO f �/, / Phone:(781)670-9990 j I s. CITY Fax: (781)670.9939 V j I j CIVIL ENGINEER: I % 1.330.56 Trudell Consulting Engineers / 478 Blair Park Road Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 I ; MATCH LINE 'A' Phone:(802)87MM1 I I I Fax: (802)879MW - _ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SE Group / I •` I'\ 131 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Phone:(802)862-0096 I I 20• VIDE EASEMENT FOR Fax: (802)865-2440 / I '--p---_- - ' BNE PAIN DEOCA rED TO CITY OF SO SING i MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. yr• ? ai I 431Wpp Drive I ( I 1 Williston, VT 05495 KID LL uc Phone:(802)864-3800 175 P. 160 Fax: (802)884-3904 I K3 f05 J9 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER Omega Electric 25 Omega Drive I I N ^ Williston, VT 05495 / y1 Phone:(802)862-0517 Fax (802)8824349 FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protection ' ! FOR KIM6ALL AVE P.O. Box2004 &BIKE PATH SEE Colchester, VT 05446 I SHEETS PI. P2 K P3 Phone:(802)878.6594 I ! II Fax: (802)878-2186 DATE: 09/07/2007 ! li SCALE: 1•--30' i CATv/ro i I REVISIONS i I I II No. Dale I I F1n91 Car SWIMINkII 9-13-07 2 R—l" for AppM lo-oz-o7 SIGN 3 wPPra _ 4 1 j «onell 10-15-os i -«i i 1' ♦V - NO.7637 j CIVIL I------------- _. aL- ----- '� i r , _ Site Plan ..3 I _ ... 1, nrT ? n f1 n - Cit City of So. Burlington So, r � %� �al southburli.ngton PLANNING & ZONING November 14, 2008 Bob Gallo Trudell Consulting Engineers PO Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Re: Technology Park Dear Mr. Gallo: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, November 18, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, 1 Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com rr �, n% ► RE e 0'.�11 southburlington PLANNING & ZONING November 19, 2008 Bob Gallo Trudell Consulting Engineers PO Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Re: Site Plan Application #SP-08-101, 124 Technology Park Way Dear Mr. Gallo: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board on November 18, 2008. Please note the conditions of approval including that a —ning permit must be obtained within six 6 months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Brown Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl, CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7008 0150 0003 6150 5287 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846,4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com Site Plan Application Permit Number SP- d� - APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): 124 Technology Park Way, LLC - 30 Community Drive, Suite 4, South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 860-1691 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): 124 Technology Park Way, LLC - 30 Community Drive, Suite 4, South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 860-1691 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) - Attn: Bob Gallo P.O. Box 308, Williston, VT 05495 Phone: (802) 879-6331 Fax: (802) 879-6331 a. Contact e-mail address: robert@trudeliconsulting.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 124 Technology Park way 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): I_1'I"l) - 001 a W 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): The applicant is seeking approval to reconfigure the dumpster area and turnaround on the West side of the building. In order to implement the desiredrecycling program for the building, an extra receptacle is required in the —du mpster area (specificall�or recylced materials). I he previously approve"trash" clumpster will remain in the approved location, outside of the wetland u er. The truck turnaround has been redesigned to accommodate larger front load dumpster trucks, so that the vehicle can safely make a turn and and leave the site, rather than backing through a heavy pedestrian area as currently designed. Miscellaneous adjustments in the area layout have resulted in a reduction of wetland buffer impact from the previous approval. The area is curbed and graded to direct all runoff from the pavement surfaces to the stormwater treatment system. The applicant is proposing the changes in order to provide ample storage area for trash and recycled materials (as part of a responsible recycling program), and to provide a safer pedestrian environment during pick up times. Site Plan Application b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Commercial office building currently under construction. c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): No change from previous approval. d. Total building sauare footaae on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): No change from previous approval e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): No change from previous approval f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): None g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non - office employees): No change from previous approval h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 217,947 Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing 8.3 _ % / 18,153 sq. ft. Proposed_8.3 % / 18,153 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing_ 42.03 _% / _ 91,611 sq. ft. Proposed_44.5 % / _ 96,971 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing16.3 % / 4,232 sq. ft. Proposed 16.3 % _4,232 sq. ft. E Site Plan Application d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) '1 acre, currently authorized under CGP 3-9020 * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): b. Landscaping: $_No Change $ No Change c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): No Change b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): No Change c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): No Change 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8 am - 5 pm 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: M-F 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Spring 2008 (final plantings to be installed, site work will be completed in Fall 2008) 14. ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) See Attached 3 Site Plan Application I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. TURSOF APPLICANT John Mick for 124 TechnologV Park Way SlGi�vF k• r • ,� PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 10/ 1� 6 REVIEW AUTHORITY: [ J evelopment Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ complete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee ig Date PLAN NOTE THIS PLAN IS FOR THE PURPOSE O SITE PLANSTRATING UTILITY '- / �'` i= . LOCH TIOV$ ONLY. FOR COMPLETE SITE PLAN INFORMATION REFER 70 SHEET SP2OW E VARIOUS PVC ICONDUITSLLUSTRATIVE ON 1` ME RAN ARE SNOW SIDE BY -SIDE FOR ILLVSTRATIW I PURPOSES ONLY. ACTUAL INSTALLATION ICI NOR BE H ACCORDANCE NM STANDARD PRACTICES FOR BE IN RESPECTIVE UTILITY• - CONSTRUCTION NOTES PARCEL A 1 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: THESE BANS WERE PREPARED N NCnCN IN THE ENGINEERS (TCE) AND ARE INTENDED ro BE USED TI N CONTRACT. NM THE /Y STANDARD 8 ME ENGINEERS j W ME CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT EC-(E PREPARED BY ME ENGINEERS AWi CONTRACT DOCUMENTS COMMITTEE (EA)L), - LATEST EDITION. COPIES ARE AVAILABLE AT WMYYNSPE.ORG/EADC 2. UNTIERGRQUNo IMPROVEMENTS: ME LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UNITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOAT ARE ASSUMED BASED ON RESEARCH. UNITY PLANS ✓/// PROVIDED ER OTHERS. AN MT SURFACE EVIDENCE AVAILABLE AND WERE ALOBTAINED ' IN A MANNER CONSISTENT NN NE ORDINARY STANDARD E PROFESSIONAL CARE AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY ME OANER OR 17$ DESIGN ENGINEER. 3DIFFERNG SUBSURFACE OR PHYSICAL CONDITION& IF CONTRACTOR BELIEVES MAT ANY SUBSURFCOVERED O RE PHYSICAL CONDITION (7) I AT OR CONTIGUOUS NATURE TO THE SITE THAT IS UNCOVERED OR REVEALED EITHER: H I$ OF SUCH A NATURE A RI ESTABLISH THAT ANY E. OR (2)I DATA- C ARCH RE AS CONTRACTOR RELIED IS MATERIALLY INA NSI AIE: OR (7) IS M SUCH A NATURE AS 70 REWIRE A CHANGE W THE RAN$/ CONTRACT DOCUMENTS; OR (J) DIFFERS MATERIALLY FROM THAT SHONN OR INDICATED IN THE PLANS/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS; OR (4) IS OF AN UNUSUAL - NATURE. AND DIFFERS MA SERIALLY FROM CONDITIONS ORDINARILY ENCOUNTERED AND .I [ GENERALLY RECOGNIZED AS INHERENT IN WORN OF THE CHARACTER PROVIDED FOR IN ME PLANS/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS; MEN CONTRACTOR SHALL. PROMPTLY AFTER BECOMING AWARE THEREOF AND BEFORE FURTHER DISTURBING THE SUBSURFACE OR PHYSICAL CONDITIONS OR PERFORMING ANY WORK IN CONNECTION MERENM (EXCEPT IN AN EMERGENCY). NOTIFY OMNER AND ENGINEER ABOUT SUCH CONDITION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT TURNER DISTURB SUCH CONDITION OR PERFORM ANY WORK IN CONNECTION MERENM (EXCEPT AS AFORESAID) UNTIL RECEIPT OF WRITTEN ORDER TO DO SO 1 UTILITIES: PRIVATE AND PUBLIC UTILITIES SUCH AS ELECTRIC. TELEPHONE. GAS .' CABLE. FIBER OPTIC ETC. ARE ME RESPONSIBILITY OF ME RESPECTIVE UTILITY 7.J.zS/S COMPANY ANY INFORMATION SHOWN BY TEE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY - (USUALLY TO ASSIST ATH PERMITTING) FINAL DESIGN. CONSTRUCTION AND _ f MAINTENANCE ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES. COMPLIANCE NTH EASEMENTS AND REGULATIONS (STATE AND LOCAL) ARE THE - -- -- - a OUTLET OJ e _ L RESPdiSIBIII Tr OF RESPECTIVE UNITY COMPANY / _ - _ 3350 J3 0 S.DIGSAFE: IN ACCORDANCE NM KRMONi STATE LAW (NSA PRE JO aIMiER 86 LOT Z 3(3-3- aRRxES) / YI.J33 JJ.75 I TOPE FLARED 10' WIDE EMERGENCY $PXLWAY 33S.S c»d+ END GEES) RPRAP TYPE M "Es. 1.Juas sE GIMP.) STONE REEF TIP/CAL , AND PSB RULE 3.800) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO CONTACT / MT.JJJ IS 1 T I OGSATE SYSTEMS NC-OCSAFE- AT I-BBB-NI-7233 AT LEAST /B HOURS , I 1 EXCLUDING SATURDAYS, SUNDAYS. AND LEGAL HOLIDAYS. BUT NOT MORE MAN 30 - NT REVISION ARE -.I I 1 DAYS BEFORE COMMENCING EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES EXCEPT IN AN EMERGENCY ME ONSIBLE FOR PRE -MARKING ME 91L AND MAINTAINING ! CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESP1 MECHANICAL _ DESIGN ITED YA�RKINGS FOR MORE INFORMATION ON OGSAFE REQUIREMENTS SEE CUNIT IN f?4aE1E \ 1 \Y 1 6.JOSSITE SAFETY NEITHER THE PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES OF TRUDELL CONSULTING PAD ENGINEERS (TCE). NOR THE PRESENCE OF TCE OR ITS EMPLOYEES AND $US TRANSFORMER' SO' WETLAND CONSULTANTS ATEA CONSTRUCTION SITE, SHALL RELIVE ME GENERAL CONTRACTOR I p� COMdtE J. BUFFER CpN TVK B \\ AND ANY OTHER ENTITY OF THEIR OBLIGATIONS, DUKES AND RESPONSIBILITIES I `ID F.J,%.yA \ INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED to CONSTRUCTION MEANS. METHODS, SEQUENCE. TECHNIQUESlTR PROCEDURE$ NECESSARY FOR PERFORMING SUPERINTENDING OR .I S♦f I I N TYPE I r.JN 7 2• A OF THE WORN O RON A I NM C G LL PORTIONS OOR RIPRAP REAR 'y , `'+ 1JJI,JS IY REPLACE EXISTING FRAME ! CONTRA R SAFETY A ONS REQUIRED ME CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS REWIRED BY ANY REGULATORY AGENCIES. AND ITS HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO IE i.335.0 d SE15Ad(� Jn. ORATE AM LEeAROM VIA Y HIM CONTRACTOR OTHER ENTITY EXERCISE ANY CONTRO OVER ANY IONPERSONNEL TR 05 Y4 TJ+ ON EQUAL (T H;ASTING H-; NEIOV HE N MiH THEIR MOWN OR ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY OR THEIR EMPLOYEES IN CONNECTION L -. T PRECAU SINS. OR CLIENT AGREES THAT AR GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ARSINE SAFETY, AND WARRANTS MAT THIS INTENT SHALL BE MADE EVIDENT IN ME CLIENT'S AGREEMENT MTH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. THE Jy L.3J70 ; N � Ut \ @ I ` _ __t__ AND 6" GAYER - AND B• WR VALVE - i HYDRANT TEE CLIENT ALSO AGREES THAT THE CLIENT, TCE AND TOES CONSULTANTS SHALL BE`. INDEMNIFED AND SHALL BE MADE ADDITIONAL INSURED UNDER ME GENERAL .... !-R �0 CONTRACTOR'S GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY 7CODES AND STANDARDS COMPLIANCE: TCE SHALL EXERCISE USUAL AND CUSTOMARY I° a I I ' Su11P `s eOjiOM.3270 IN.3wo . •, sJ D' (ifPK'4) J,7B / AR IN 1 EFFORTS TO COMPLY CODES STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE TS E ORTS S I i ' - - 1 i. -- OU 3Ja0 �. OM REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES IN EFFECT ME OCONR ACKNOWLEDGES THAT SUCH R EFTS MAY BE SUBJECT TO VARIOUS AND CONTRADICTORY INTERPRETATIONS . ICE. THEREFORE, ALL ITS REASONABLE PROFESSIONAL EFFORTS AND JUDGMENT TO INTERPRET APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AS THEY APPLY TO THE ' NIL --------i L,� Ut H/'ORANT, / U THE PRT ICE HONEVER. CANNOT AND ODES NOT WARRANT OR GUARANTEE THAT THE PROEC7 WILL (:DIMPLY N'IH ALL INTERPRETATIONS OF SUCH REQUIREMENTS, I CLY JRa. i.J.-'a nJJ7.0 .0. 1�67' M.0 F Y BCONSTRUCDON OBSERVATNIN: ICE MAY NWT ME PROJECT AT APPROPRIATE I INTERVALS CONSTRUCTION DIME GENERALLY TO DER MIN ME 1E ALS OARING CONSiRUC 01l TO BECOME PROGRESS AND QUALITY OF THE MORN AND ro DETERMINE E ME ' I 'y . I � P LOIN - "f AL ACCORDANCE'S MORN IS PRECEDING IN GENERA/ ACCORDANCE NTH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ME OWNER HAS NOT RETAINED TCE TO MAKE DETAILED INSPECTIONS OR TO I .3372 i PROPOSED 3 STORY�61 OfFKE BUM)ING PROVIDE EXHAUSTIVE OR CONTINUOUS PRO.IECT RENEW AND OBSERVATION SERVICES ICE DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE PERFORMANCE OF, AND SHALL NOT HAW I , '- '---oSn FF.E. 3410 'Ca W ' ®M RESPONSIBILITY FOR. THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF ANY CONTRACTOR, N21 • I •� R SUB -CONTRACTOR, SUPPLER OR ANY OMER ENTITY FURNISHING MATERIALS OR 7 .13 YM.3J6331 PERFORMING ANY MORN ON ME PROAECl TCE $NAZI NOT SUPERVISE, OMECi OR HAVE CONTRX CWR THE CONTRACTOR'S WORT( NOR HAW ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR POTHER ! COMMUNICATIONS DIVERGE (ROVER CONiRAIES IN(II').J.1 ME CONSTRUCTION MEANS METHODS TECHNIQUES. SEQUENCES OR PROCEDURES OF M N�Ar • NIL w0.ns CwawICwTIONS ENTER \ ,OUT.JJ36 THE CONTRACTOR. AT THE OMNER DESIRES MORE EXTENSIVE PROJ:CT BLDG,) GBSERVA ION OR FULL-TIME PROJECT REPRESENTATION, ME OWNER SHALL REQUEST SUCH SERVICES BE PROVIDED BY TCE AS ADDITIONAL SERVICES. ITIPK .� J'CONOIAT.� ' \ (CAP AT i \\ YARN IW 1 rJI hJ771 PROPOSER +� ~'T•77I1 n T UNDERGROUND MINER , .. ` \ I 1 61 2-5' SCH40 PVC CONDUITS (DIP) (i)-1' SCH 10 PK (KRNzaN) I (I)-1- SCH 40 PVC (TEL.ET) (1)-1- SCH 10 PVC (SPARE) I M� - 1 (T)-1' SCH 10 PVC (LEVEL 3) TOP OF FoorlNc L ��. EL.-33aO ' CejID Tree B, - 1�= ; 31a7 1.3J72 I ( I I I I I I PROPOSE O JIi -- / PRGOOSED CAS I i (1)-S' 10 PVC COOND" (GW) Santa C ' (7}I- SCH w PVC COPOATS (KInzOW) / I M]Ia81 �377. I (1) -1- SCH M PK CODIAT (LEVEL J) NL' (1)-4-$04 10 PVC CONDU T (TEL.ET) - Ns SCH IO PVCCONTAT (SPARE) IT r33za Ca - -- -- - -. .. IC _--------- EWER-S s _EIIER.31aJ0 IMTER.33620 T UMI7Y F.7M0 ..� .� I EASE T p ALl7 yyROPOSED - YC"r RASE RW i0 Na31 / SERMOE Snle aI / TO LOT J / RECORE 6- SERVICE TOR I ..-.•-..-..-••-.. --..- REFORM INVERT - ml ]IS• T^T•e PTr Y .- ..J. - LI i IN.J10.18 (STUB) ��9 l ( I J• c0110AT i 7/0.J1 (CAP ! YAlbr ENO) I I I R Si.Js].» 6 i EB h il'PE B D5 SDENAIIi (iM., TELIT ANC BOX , I --- C03161.J B r.31a10 II (RUSH W/ GRADE) i I ay.M40 Our..TJBaw LEVEL3/CATv AMC. BOX IS- Ya.JJ1.0 JN (RUSH GRADE) SPARE JLINC BOX I MADE) I I l o IOIUT.7J9. (RUSH % 5T..7100 CONCRETE 6X12-KRIZON VALOT I YL 4 I ij ENCA M E T �33680 ENCASEMENT (1)-S- SCH 10 PVC (GMP) 1 . 1 I 7 w i CAS ! SEW, / Graphic Scale (1)-4' SCH 10 PVC (WMZON)•. I N�, H!d " , EXISTINI; 20• / Fee[ (7)-1- )-4 PVC (MEWL (TCITY) j (7)-4- SCH 10 PVC (-ARE) I (7)-1' SCH 10 PK (SPARE) a I I 1 :SEWER FASEMENI / I 30 N 30 60 90 120 W/ 1 ALINES$ P0575 I q j l I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I 1.334.8 •��I 1 I Technology Park 1\ I; • i _ PARCEL C { South Burlington, VT If• , ;�q _ Lot 2 OWNER: 1 .1 1 ' II.• I 8 XQ�� - 124 Technology Park Way, LLC 30 Community Drive Suite 4 If', '• - �� South Burlington, VT 05403 It Phone:(802)B60-1691 Fax: (802)860-1695 I I II i I DESIGN BUILDER: :;% j I It, • i _ ReArch Company 30 Community Drive Suite 8 I 1 Il.a PARCEL A South Burlington, yr 05403 Phone:(802)863.8727 DELINEATED ! REPUR.CW SECTION Fax: (802)8638734 r CLASS 11 I II' WETLAND / i ARCHITECT: II i __._-.------J i S2 Architecture ' 5224 Shelburne Rd. I Ifi --- L330.o(s' 1 Shelburne, VT05482 I I I i gyp; Phone:(802)98.55595 O NT Fax: (802)8855565 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: I>rT 1,V: Goldstein -Milano LLC i j A• /� //� / ' 125 Main Street EXISTING 20' � / / Reading, MA 01867 I I i EASEMECITYNT TO% ��/// Phone:(781 �709990 OF S. BURLT!9raA-- /` Fax: (781)670.9939 CIVIL ENGINEER: I I !1.330.5e Trudell Consulting Engineers wtL L NEW cOutRErE 478 Blair Park Road TRUC ENO r P.O. Box 308 �Lm Williston, VT 05495 I I ; ATCH LINE •A- Phone:(802)879.6331 I � Fax: (802)879-0060 ----- _ _ % LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SE Group / I`'• i 131 Church Street I � I � II '.yI Burlington, VT 05401 i % `�,_�-;r-.¢_•' .._ _ . ..... Phone:(802)862-009ti I ' 20' VIDE EASEMENT FOR Fax: (802)865.2440 SWE PAN DEDI TED TO - i MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. I / ... ♦ I P.O. BOX 525 Z ,atf' j i, 43 Krupp Drive a � Williston VT 05495 120 K14NB�ALL LLc Phone:(802)864-3800 -a- , M r» P. 160 Fax: (802)864-3904 /\ 1 pD. 105 . 39 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Omega Electric d I 25 Omega Drive ��1 Williston, VT 05495 n I ( Phone:(802)862-0517 1�✓/' Fax: (802)862-4349 ij 14 �� FIRE PROTECTION: } North Country Fire Protection FOR KIMdALL AVE P.O. Box2004 i '! O `• & BIKE PATH SEE Colchester, VT 05446 SHEETS PL P2 & P3 Phone:(802)878.6594 i � I! Fax: (802)878-2188 DATE: 01/22/2008 SCALE: 1'.30' CA TV/FO ii GAS A KRIZON URInES SHALL REVISIONS I SE BadO/DINECnWNr GRILLED BENEATH HRNBALI AVENLE. UNlC55 NO. Dote APPROVAL FOR AN OPEN CUT CAN OBTAINED HALM M CITY O SOUTH 91RRPW'iM 1 capPY.1.I SKC Not 7 ! IJ VIL '•- • gOAD ---ft aNiL o` PIKE ------- Utility Plan _ - .. �P2A Uc T, City of so fso ,.VERMONT State of Vermont A GENCY OF NA TURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division Essex Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452-4695 Telephone: (802) 879-5656 May 23, 2008 Technology Park Partners Assoc c/o John Illick 30 Community Drive, Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Subject WW-4-1476, Construct a 50,000 square foot office building on Lot #2, 200 employees, municipal water and sewer, 3,000 gpd located on Kimball Avenue in South Burlington, Vennont. Dear John: I have reviewed the application and technical information submitted for the above referenced project. Unfortunately, there were items that were not included or were insufficient and I was unable to determine if this project meets the minimum standards of the Environmental Protection Rules. Please provide the following information: 1. Please provide a copy of the Water Supply Permit for this project. Please respond within thirty, (30) days from the date of this letter. Re -submittals that are incomplete, or made after thirty days may result in the denial of the project. Once I receive the information requested, I will continue my review of the project. If you have any questions as to what is needed, please contact me. Sincerely, William Zabiloski Assistant Regional Engineer cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) w� � ®VERMONT State of Vermont A GENCY OF NA TURAL RESOURCES Department of Environmental Conservation Wastewater Management Division Essex Regional Office 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452-4695 Telephone: (802) 879-5656 May 6, 2008 Technology Park Partners c/o John Illick 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington VT 05403 RE: WW-4-1476-1, amending permit to account for the increase in square footage only from 50,000 square feet to 54,459 square feet on Lot # 2, 124 Technology Park Way, South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Applicant: We received your completed application for the above referenced project on May 5, 2008, including a fee of $50.00 paid by check #4027. Under the performance standards for this program, we have a maximum of 30 days of "in-house" time to review your application. If we require further information from you to make a decision, the time until we receive it is not included in the in-house performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 30 in-house days, please contact this office. Please submit document authorizing this person to act as a signatory authority to this application. We have forwarded the information contained in your application to the Information Specialist for this region. A Project Review Sheet will be sent to you indicating other state agencies and departments you should contact regarding additional permits or approvals you may need under their programs. If you have not already done so, you should also check with town officials about any necessary town permits. For the Division of Wastewater Management -/l . Mary Baril Administrative Technician II cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Jeremy M. Matosky a�Y3� Impact Fee Calculation for New Non -Residential Construction A Project Name to ; T?o j B Effective Date 4ef47 C Type of use D Type of construction E Value of construction per square foot from Appendix 1 ` F Total square feet of new construction G Total value of new construction E x F H Above in units of $1,000 ` r/.f 9, ?J! G / 1000 I Existing land value 6 90 4 �, S-ep Grand list J Above in units of $1,000 ,- I / 1000 1 o� K Total 11ue ol�site and improvements after construction 0Z 31rig G + I L Above in units of $1,000 , ?j' M K / 1000 a ROAD IMPACT FEE M Base road impact fee per VTE N Estimated PM peak hour VTEs O Base road impact fee P Credit per $1,000 (Table RD-5) for past payments Q Credit for past payments R Credit per $1,000 (Table RD-6) for future payments S Credit for future payments T Total road impact fee FIRE PROTECTION FEE $144.56 a MxN J x P �S L x R g.� O-Q-S Estimated post construction value of structure and contents ( C°% ,�► U in units of $1,000 �•+'7� �� t� H x 1.875 V Base fire protection impact fee % 07 $0.87 x U Credit per $1,000 of land value Q) for past tax payments W (Table FP-4) X Total credit applicable to project for past tax payments Post -construction value of structure and land excluding From FP-4 lt� ( W x J Y contents G + I Z Above in units of $1,000 %%J �s �% Y / 1,000 Credit per $1,000 of post -construction value for future tax ✓� AA pmts (Table FP-5) 0 From FP - AB Total credit applicable to project for future tax payments �� , �+ AA x Z AC Total fire protection impact fee V - X - AB TOTAL ROAD AND FIRE WPACT FEE Calculation sheets.xls 2 lot CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: If —() bg� I NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST iiY� !/�t►�-A AY NCh6.�.eK 35 5 1 Ko.ps C� �.i 0 3S- n �r� �i . 3. 1 S'441'.krr-k C, /c�,,�' U �ck-s �E�N A2c,c1TEQ!rS Bo st :Z-Z- HONES i3✓�lr� v; 6SyGk z22 DUl� . J• r L w Ste. . I VT 3y0 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: O Cr NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST 2 C- 6k r�7 I r cf--) L.4 Ne J� U41C Dr, 3a o%l To V14, silo L '+ a C Cam,„ S{ , R) r s^^c -7 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24V.SJ..A..-§ 4471(c). HEARING DATE: I �4/ v l NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST AV 1/' October 11, 2007 Trudell Consulting Engineers Mr. Bob Gallo P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 RE: Technology Park, Lot 2 Dear Bob: The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the final plans for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below and refer also to all previous pertinent comments. 1. The current set of plans for the above referenced project is acceptable to this department relative to all water related activity provided the changes or corrections included in this letter have been addressed, including: a. Subdivision Plat: The proposed 20' easement to the Champlain Water District should be to the City of South Burlington. This easement will be the location of the future required water line connection that will complete the loop with the existing Community Drive water main. However, it should be noted that if future construction design plans do not allow the connection of the Community Drive water main to Tilley Drive through this easement, than another easement and water line connection must be incorporated into the overall Technology Park plans. b. Sheet SP2, P2: The new 10" valve located just east of the proposed 8" tap for Lot 2 must be identified as being a new, cut -in valve. The installation of this new 10" valve will require the temporary water interruption to the buildings currently connected to existing water main. c. Water Details: Municipal Water Main Connection: A solid sleeve shall be installed where the new valve and tee assembly connects to the existing 10" water main, not a stainless steel repair clamp as shown. 2. All water lines outside the City ROW shall be considered private and subject to all requirements as stated in the City of South Burlington Water Ordinance. All of the new water lines for this project shall be considered private. 3. This Department shall be notified of any changes to this project with revised, updated hard copy plans for further review. 4. At least 7 days before the start of actual construction the contractor shall notify the SBWD of his intent to proceed, and shall arrange a meeting to discuss the project if necessary. .l i 5. The SBWD shall be notified in advance to inspect the valve cut in, all taps, joints, fittings, appurtenances, thrust blocks, testing, and crossings prior to backfilling. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, Jay Nadeau Superintendent CC. Cathyann Larose Bruce Hoar Plan Reviews: Tech Park Lot 2 Accept 10-07 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING n,J\ 575 DORSET STREET L SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (�V� (802)846-4io6 lS� September 11, 2007 Technology Park Associates et al. 30 Community Drive #4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." Please call our office at 846-4106 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. cc: TelJet Longhaul, LLC Jennifer Desautels, Trudell Consulting Engineers CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 27, 2007 Jen Desautels Trudell Consulting Engineers PO Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Re: Tech Park Dear Ms. Desautels: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, October 2, 2007 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Y TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) September 10, 2007 Cathyann LaRose and Ray Belair So. Burlington Planning and Zoning Office 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Technology Park Lot 2 (Parcel A) Preliminary and Final Dear Ray and Cathyann: tel: 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudellconsulting.com The following items are included with this submittal for Preliminary and Final PUD applications for Technology Park Lot 2 (Parcel A). SP1-3, P1-3, EPSC1-2, D1-7, dated 9/7/07, 5 24x36 copies and 1 l 1x17 copy A2.1, A4.1, dated 5/8/07, 5 2406 copies and 1 I Ix17 copy L1.0, Ll.1, 1-2.0 dated 8/24/07, 5 2406 copies and 1 I lx17 copy Preliminary and Final PUD Application Response Letter Sewage Pumping Station Letter Preliminary and Final Fees Building Mounted Lighting Cut Sheets List of Abutters Lot Coverage Calculations Calculations for Parking Lot Island Percentage Sincerely, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. �xrnu-- CJ Jennifer A. Desautels, P.E. cc: Tim McKenzie P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Civil Engineering, Surveying, Land Planning, Water and Wastewater, Landscape Architecture. Roadway Design, Permitting 30 COMMUNITY DRIVE 4/18/07 Traffic Calculations RJB USE SQ. FOOTAGE LUC VTE'S General Office 13 1, 000 sq. ft. (LUC #710) 225.53 Warehouse 10,000 sq. ft. (LUC #150) 10.58 Light Manufacturing 81,000 sq. ft. (LUC #110) 79.38 Indoor Recreation 10,000 sq. ft. (LUC #492) 40.5 Short Order Restaurant 2000 sq. ft. (LUC #933) 87.74 Research & Testing 41,000 sq. ft. (LUC #110) 48.18 404.17 *No trips generated, not used 55 Community Drive 159.5 563.67 \\sb2k3server\apps\USERS\bmcdonough\Findings of Fact- Betsy\2007\Tech Park\traffic_calc Page 1 of 2 ray From: Jeremy Matosky [Jeremy@trudellconsulting.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 11:50 AM To: ray Cc: Jennifer Desautels, P.E.; Abby Lisius; Tim McKenzie; John Illick; Mark G. Hall; Karen Pettersen Subject: Technology Park Hi Ray - The other day when we met and discussed traffic and trip generation for Technology Park you indicated Lot 8A has exceeded the previously approved 647 PM peak hour trips by a large margin. You provided us with your trip generation calculations which indicated the ITE PM Peak trips ends for Lot 8A were 867 VTE's. We both agreed this would be reduced by 88 trips since short order restaurant was all internal captured trips for the cafeteria, which brought the your estimated ITE PM Trips down to 778. Abby re -checked the calculations using the latest ITE Trip Generation Manual and found that the ITE trips for Lot 8A should only be 399 VTE's not 778. Her calculations are provided below. We agreed with your numbers except for LUC 110, you must have made a mistake in calculating the formula. Since the fitted equations for LUC #110 yields a negative (due to small independent variable) the average rate should be used instead of the fitted curve. This made a significant difference in the overall totals. Lot 8A per ITE Trip Generation LUC Use SF Fitted Curve Equation 710 Office 131,000 T = 1.12 X + 78.91 226 150 Warehouse 10,000 Ln T = 0.79 Ln X + 0.54 11 110* Li ht Manufacturing 81,000 T = 1.43 X-163.42 -47.59 492* Health/Fitness Club 10,000 no equation n/a 933 Short Order Rest. 2,000 Assumed all internal capture trips 110* Research & Testing 41,000 T = 1.43 X-163.42 -104.79 Total 275,000 TOTAL *fitted curve yields negative trips therefore use avg. rate Our THEORETICAL numbers above also compares very well with our current volume tube counts for Technology Park which yields an ACTUAL weekday average PM peak of 344 trips. I trust you will agree that we are still well under the previously allocated 647 trips. From this point forward we will make sure we use the fitted equations for all ITE projected traffic as outlined in the SBLDR. We will also be working on calculating some new total trip numbers for the subdivision to create a more realistic allocation to work from and updating our 2006 overall traffic study. One other item for clarification, you indicated traffic impact fees are calculated based on a formula of FEES = ITE PM Peak Hour VTE x $144.56 — credits for paid tax (before) — credits for future tax (after). Can you confirm for me that roadway improvements made by the applicant would also be credited against any traffic impact fees? I believe this was the case on other projects in SB we have worked on. Regards, Jeremy M. Matosky, P.E., CPESC Project Manager / President 9/18/2007 #SP-07-56 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING TECHNOLOGY PARK ASSOCIATES, INC. — 30 COMMUNITY DRIVE SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-07-56 FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Technology Park Associates, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting site plan approval to amend a previously approved site plan for a 275,noo snft. commercial, and industrial building consisting of 131,000 sq. ft. of general office, 10,000 sq. ft. of warehouse use, 81,000 sq. ft. light manufacturing use, 10,000 sq. ft. indoor recreation use, 2,000 sq. ft. short-order restaurant (accessory) use, and 41,000 sq. ft. research and testing laboratory use, 30 Community Drive. The amendment consists of constructing a 32 sq. ft. smoking pavilion, 30 Community Drive. Based on the document file for this application, the Administrative Officer finds, concludes, and decides as follows: FINDINGS OF FACT This project consists of site plan approval to amend a previously approved site plan for a 275,000 sq. ft. commercial and industrial building consisting of 31,000 sq. ft. of general office, 10,000 sq. ft. of warehouse use, 81,000 sq. ft. light manufacturing use, 10,000 sq. ft. indoor recreation use, 2,000 sq. ft. short-order restaurant (accessory) use, and 41,000 sq. ft. research and testing laboratory use. The amendment consists of constructing a 32 sq. ft. smoking pavilion, 30 Community Drive. 2. The owner of record of the subject property is Technology Park Partners et al 3. The subject property is located in the Mixed Industrial & Commercial (Mixed IC) Zoning District. 4. The application was received on July 19, 2007. 5. The plan submitted is entitled, "Technology Park Partners Technology Park 30 Community Drive South Burlington, Vt.", prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers dated 5/15/06 with a last revised date of 6/20/07. DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS 7. The 32 sq. ft. smoking pavilion changes coverages by a miniscule amount. All dimensional requirements are being met. 8. Setback requirements are being met. 30 COMMUNITY DRIVE 9/13/07 Traffic Calculations RJB USE SQ. FOOTAGE LUC VTFS General Office 131,000 sq. ft. (LUC #710) 225.53 Warehouse 10,000 sq. ft. (LUC #150) 10.58 Light Manufacturing 81,000 sq. ft. (LUC #110) 279.25 Indoor Recreation 10,000 sq. ft. (LUC #492) 4n.5 Short Order Restaurant 2000 sq. ft. (LUC #933) 87.74 Research & Testing 41,000 sq. ft. (LUC #110) 222.05 865.65 LOT 2 TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT for TECHNOLOGY PARK South Burlington, Vermont Project Number 2000048 August 2007 Applicant: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive, Suite 4 South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Prepared by: Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 0 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) Technology Park Lot 2 Traffic Impact Report V Community Drive East South Burlington, Vermont TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 1 2.0 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC......................................................................................... 2 3.0 PROJECT -GENERATED TRAFFIC........................................................................... 3 4.0 CAPACITIES AND LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS ............................................ 4 5.0 SIGNAL WARRANTS................................................................................................ 6 6.0 CRASH ANALYSIS.................................................................................................... 6 7.0 CONCLUSION............................................................................................................. 6 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) { Technology Park Lot 2 Traffic Impact Report Community Drive East 1.0 INTRODUCTION On behalf of Technology Park Partners, Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) has prepared this Traffic Impact Report for Lot 2 of the Technology Park commercial subdivision located on Kimball Avenue in South Burlington, Vermont. Lot 2 is located in the interior of the Community Drive loop road. Access to the project will be via a private driveway connecting to Community Drive East near the intersection of Kimball Avenue and Community Drive East. The purpose of this report is to analyze the impact of the traffic generated by the proposed project, with specific focus on the Kimball Avenue/Community Drive East intersection. MprQu�s�"� South Burlington, Vermont 6 o soom soon �0 � Kirby Corn Cr a '� Shunhfke $ YV Krupp Dr N I ¢, Protect Locationa.41 t7 Fnx Run Ln C2000 MapQuest.ccm. Inc.: CE000 GDT. Inc. Figure 1: Project Site Location Map a '7GO The Lot 2 proposal consists of a 54,459 square foot commercial building with a parking area. Existing development within Technology Park includes a building with multiple businesses and parking on Lot 8A and a 65,000 sq. ft. commercial building currently under construction on Lot 7. A comprehensive Traffic Impact Report was prepared for Technology Park in 2001 by Trudell Consulting Engineers that included study of traffic from proposed build out of Lots 2 through 7. Although the horizon year was for 2008, the level of service analysis has been determined out-of-date. A 2006 Traffic Impact Report was subsequently prepared for Lots 2 through 7, which included traffic from Maple Tree Place and other area projects that have been constructed since the 2001 report. The 2006 Report assumed that a Central Access driveway would be constructed on Kimball Avenue located directly across from Shunpike Road to serve Lots 2 through 4. At the request of the City of South Burlington, Technology Park Partners has eliminated the Central Access on Kimball Avenue. Traffic from Lots 2 — 4 will now utilize Community East. The following Lot 2 Traffic Impact Report has been prepared to determine specific impacts of traffic from proposed build -out of Lot 2. The procedures and methodologies used in this study are suggested in publications by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans). TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) Technology Park Lot 2 Traffic Impact Report Community Drive East 2.0 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Background traffic volumes in the vicinity of the proposed project were determined using data from Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) and the Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) Automatic Traffic Recorder (ATR) stations. The following table contains the ATR station number and the corresponding annual average daily traffic (AADT) in vehicles per day (vpd) for the most recent year that a count has taken place. Figure 2 is a map of the physical locations of each ATR. Table]: AADT at ATR Stations South Burlington, Vermont WINN"R� • 9 D450 SOBR60 1 • D451 SOBR53 Figure 2: ATR Station Locations ATR Year AADT Location SOBR56 2003 1,600 vpd Gregory Drive SOBR53 2004 9,500 vpd Kimball Ave, just east of Community Dr. East D451 2005 7,700 vpd Kimball Ave, between Shunpike and Comm. West D450 2005 11,300 vpd Kimball Ave, west of Community Drive West SOBR 60 2003 830 vpd Shunpike Dr. Trudell Consulting Engineers performed a manual Turning Movement Count (TMC) at the Community East & Kimball Avenue intersection on 3/13/2006 to determine the background traffic distribution. The overall AM and PM peak hours for the study area are from 7:15 to 8:15 AM and 4:15 to 5:15 PM, respectively, with the evening hour experiencing a greater overall traffic volume. The turning movement short count was adjusted to correspond to the design hour volume (DHV) for each intersection approach using WinTum, a volume balancing program. The DHV's were determined using VTrans' DHV Determination Based on AADTs and Highway Class -General Highway. In some cases, the DHV is determined based on the 301h highest hour recorded at a Continuous Traffic Counter (CTC), but in this location, CTC data is unavailable and therefore the general DHV was used. Traffic growth rates within the study area over the past 15-years, as calculated from historic data at local ATR's, vary station to station. Future traffic volumes at each ATR were estimated using the VTrans Growth Factor for rural roads because there are still several large tracts of undeveloped land in the area. A growth factor of 1.02 was applied to the 2006 short count traffic to estimate 2008 traffic volumes and a factor of 1.08 was applied to estimate the 2013 horizon year. TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 2 Technology Park Lot 2 Traffic Impact Report Community Drive East 3.0 PROJECT -GENERATED TRAFFIC South Burlington, Vermont Project -generated traffic for the 54,459 sq. ft. commercial building was determined using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 71' Edition. The General Office Land Use Code most closely resembled the proposed land use and was used to calculate the following weekday and peak hour vehicle trips. Tahle 2 - Proiect-Generated Traffic Calrulatinn 54,459 sq. ft floor area Avg. Rate per 1000 sq. ft. Total Veh.Trips Enter Exit Weekday 11.01 600 300 300 AM Peak 1.55 84 74 10 PM Peak 1.49 81 14 67 Traffic generated by this project is distributed based on analogy to background traffic patterns and also by Origin and Destination (O&D) Surveys that were sent to existing businesses within Technology Park in 2001. Because of the location of the Lot 2 access driveway, it can be assumed that on most occasions, all of the traffic entering and exiting the site will utilize the Community East/ Kimball Avenue intersection. The following figures show the AM and PM project generated traffic patterns for the intersection based on this distribution scheme. Gregory Drive 1_7IN 7 Kimball Ave. r 31 Kimball Ave. 36 5 1 1 1 4 74 Community Drive East Figure 3: AM Peak Project Traffic Distribution (`ice TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 3 Technology Park Lot 2 Traffic Impact Report Community Drive East South Burlington, Vermont Gregory Drive tN 2 Kimball Ave. r 6 6 1 N Kimball Ave. 38 1 5 1 24 t 14 67 Community Drive East Figure 4: PM Peak Project Traffic Distribution 4.0 CAPACITIES AND LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS An intersection analysis was performed for the Community Drive East/ Kimball Avenue intersection for the AM and PM peak hours for the four scenarios described below. • The 2008 No -Build scenario includes background traffic and estimated traffic from the currently under construction Lot 7. To mitigate traffic impacts from Lot 7 and future development of Technology Park, east and westbound left turn lanes and a northbound left turn lane were required at the Kimball Avenue/Community Drive East intersection. Construction of these improvements is also underway, and therefore the future geometry was used in the analysis. • 2008 Build traffic consists of project -generated trips added to the 2008 No -Build scenario traffic. • For the 2013 No -Build scenario, a growth rate factor was applied to 2008 No -Build volumes. • 2013 Build traffic conditions were modeled adding Lot 2 generated trips to 2013 No -Build traffic. TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 4 Technology Park Lot 2 Traffic Impact Report Community Drive East South Burlington, Vermont The Level of Service (LOS) analysis was performed for the intersection using methodologies presented in the Highway Capacity Manual' (HCM). LOS, vehicle delay, volume to capacity ratio, and 95% queue length were calculated for the intersections using McTrans Highway Capacity Software (HCS). An analysis period of one hour with a peak hour factor of 1.00 was used, as recommended by Wrans. The HCM LOS grade associated with ranges of vehicle delay is outlined are the following table. Table 3: Level of Service Descriptions - Unsiznalized Level of Service Control Delay sec/veh A <10 B >10 and <15 C > 15 and <25 D >25 and <35 E >35 and <50 F >50 The results of the LOS analysis are shown in the tables below. Because of the installation of the east and westbound left turn lanes on Kimball Avenue, LOS for Kimball Avenue through traffic does not experience a degradation resulting from the addition of project -generated traffic. Southbound side -street traffic does experience increased delay, but delay is within acceptable limits and there is a maximum calculated queue of five vehicles. Northbound side -street LOS remains acceptable through the 2013 Build scenario. Only the northbound left turns are expected to see longer, LOS F range, delays during the peak hours, but left turning volumes represent less than 9% of total intersection traffic during the 2013 Build scenario. Table 4: Level of Service Analysis Results- AM AM 2008 2013 No Build Build No Build Build LOS Delay s) Queue (veh) LOS Delay (s) Queue (veh) LOS Delay (s) Queue (veh) LOS Delay s) Queue (veh) Eastbound L A 8.5 0.18 A 8.5 0.18 A 8.6 0.20 A 8.6 0.20 Westbound L A 8.5 0.29 A 8.8 0.40 A 8.6 0.29 A 8.8 0.41 Northbound L E 44.5 0.78 F 614.9 1.33 F 50.5 0.89 F 73.7 1.58 TR B 14.4 0.25 C 15.9 0.39 B 14.9 0.26 C 16.7 0.38 5outhbound LTR C 21.6 1.11 D 27.6 1.77 C 23.5 1.34 D 31.3 2.19 Table 5: Level of Service Analysis Results -PM PM 2008 2013 No Build Build No Build Build LOS Delay s Queue veh LOS Delay s Queue veh LOS Delay s Queue veh LOS Delay s Queue veh Eastbound L A 8.5 11.00 A 8.5 0.11 A 8.6 0.12 A 8.6 0.12 Westbound L I A 8.4 0.10 A 8.4 0.11 A 8.5 0.10 A 8.5 0.11 Northbound L F 119.3 7.18 F 427.3 18.88 F 182.3 9.30 1 F 652.0 23.27 TR C 15.2 0.99 C 16.4 1.39 C 15.8 1.05 C 17.3 1.48 5outhbound LTR D 27.6 3.09 D 33.7 3.89 D 33.4 3.99 1 E 42.7 5.19 1 Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2000. TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 5 Technology Park Lot 2 Traffic Impact Report Community Drive East 5.0 SIGNAL WARRANTS South Burlington, Vermont A signal warrant analysis was performed for the Kimball Avenue/Community East intersection based on the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices2. It was determined that two of the eight signal warrants were met — Warrant 2: 4-Hour Vehicle Volume, and Warrant 3: Peak Hour Volume. No new warrants are met as a result of the Lot 2 traffic. According to the most recent edition of the MUTCD, "Traffic control signals should not be installed unless one or more of the signal warrants in this Manual are met. The satisfaction of a warrant or warrants is not in itself justification for a signal ... The engineering study should indicate the installation of a traffic signal will improve the overall safety and/or operation of the intersection". Athough two of the warrants are met, traffic signals were not recommended for the intersection in 2001 discussions with the City of South Burlington and VTrans, when the traffic from Lots 2 -7 was considered, and are also not recommended at this time. Reasons for not recommending signals include safety concerns due to the respective short sight distances for the existing Community East intersection, cost, and maintenance. In addition, "thru" traffic on Kimball Avenue will continue to experience Level of Service "A". Only side -street (project) northbound left -turning traffic will experience delay greater than 50 seconds (or LOS F) during the peak traffic periods, which can be acceptable for short periods of time in an urban setting according to the HCM. The City of South Burlington has not indicated a signal is required at this location. 6.0 CRASH ANALYSIS The crash rate on Kimball Avenue at the intersection with Community East was determined using data from the Agency of Transportation 5-Year General Yearly Summary: l/1/2000 to 12/31/2004. There were a total of seven crashes at the intersection recorded in the five-year study period, and 19.07 million vehicles entering the intersection for an actual crash rate of 0.367 crashes per million entering vehicles. The critical crash rate of 0.704 was calculated for this intersection using a Statewide Average Rate of 0.371 for similar intersections. The critical rate exceeds the actual crash rate and therefore this intersection would not currently be classified as a High Crash Location (HCL). 7.0 CONCLUSION Based on the results of the review and analysis of the existing and projected traffic conditions in the area of the site, the following conclusions are presented. Lot 2 in Technology Park is expected to generate approximately 84 vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 81 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. 2 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), Federal Highway Administration, 2003. TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 6 r Technology Park Lot 2 Traffic Impact Report Community Drive East South Burlington, Vermont 2. Vehicles will be accessing the site from Kimball Avenue via the existing unsignalized Community East intersection. Left turn lanes for the east, west, and northbound approaches are currently under construction to mitigate traffic impacts associated with the project. 3. Kimball Avenue currently experiences an Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volume of 7,700 vehicles per day (vpd) between Community Drive East and Community Drive West. 4. A Level of Service analysis at the Community Drive East/Kimball Ave/Gregory Dr. intersection determined that "thru" Kimball Avenue traffic will not be negatively impacted by the construction of the proposed project. 5. Minor -street (Community Drive, Gregory, Shunpike) delay does increase with the addition of the project -generated traffic to the roadway network during the AM and PM peak hour. A longer delay is generally acceptable with a low minor street traffic volume and in urban settings. 6. There is adequate length for vehicle queuing on the side streets. The intersection will need to be re -analyzed in the future prior to the development of lots not included in this traffic report. As traffic volume continues to grow on Kimball Avenue, additional geometric or other improvements may be warranted. TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 7 Peak Hour Trip Generation Summary (Lot 2&7) Project: Technology Business Park Job No.: 2000048-6 Client: Technology Park Partners, LLC 710 General Office Building 1.55 Avg. Rate AM Peak Hour Trips / 1000 SF 88% Enter 1 12% Exit Engineer: AAL Date: 8/24/2007 1.49 Avg. Rate PM Peak Hour Trips / 1000 SF 17% Enter 1 83% Exit Estimated Trip Distribution by Lot Gross Floor Code 710 Code 140 AM Avg Peak Hr. PM Avg Peak Hr. Lot Area (SF) % Office %Manuf. Trip Ends Enter Exit Trip Ends Enter Exit 2 (Proposed) 54,459 100 0 84 74 10 81 14 67 7 (Proposed) 65,000 100 0 101 89 12 97 16 80 Total (Proposed) 119,459 TOTAL 185 163 22 178 30 148 Estimated Trip Distribution at Project Drives AM Avg Peak Hr. PM Avg Peak Hr. Trip Ends Enter Exit Trip Ends Enter Exit 185 163 22 178 30 148 Community East & Kimball Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst AAL Intersection lGrrlbaffAve/Community East Agency/Co. Trudell Consulting Engineers Jurisdiction South Burlington, VT Date Performed 812412007 Analysis Year 2008 No -Build Analysis Time Period AM Peak Project Description Technology Park - 2000048 East/West Street: Kimball Ave North/South Street: Community East Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 63 358 82 98 417 42 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 63 358 82 98 417 42 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 27 2 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 24 6 26 19 21 68 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 24 6 26 19 21 68 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 2 j 5 5 5 I 3 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N Y Storage 1 1 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 Configuration L I I TR LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L L TR LTR Volume, v (vph) 63 98 24 32 108 Capacity, cm (vph) 1102 1120 115 415 397 /c ratio 0.06 0.09 0.21 0.08 0.27 Queue length (95%) 0.18 0.29 0.78 0.25 1.11 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.5 8.5 44.5 14.4 21.6 LOS A A E B C Approach delay (s/veh) - -- 27.3 21.6 [Approach LOS -- -- D C HCS2000TM Copyright t) 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f file://CADocuments and Settings\lisius.TCE\Local Settings\Temp\u2kElA.tmp 8/24/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY keneral Information ISite Information nal st AAL enc /Co. Trudell Consulting Engineers Date Performed 812412007 nal sis Time Period AM Peak Intersection Kimball Avel Community East Jurisdiction South Burlington, VT Analysis Year 2008 Build Project Description Technology Park - 2000048 East/West Street: Kimball Ave North/South Street: Community East Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 63 358 118 129 417 42 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 63 358 118 1 129 417 42 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 - - 2 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 29 8 31 19 28 68 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 29 8 31 19 28 68 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 2 5 5 5 3 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N y Storage 1 1 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR LTR Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L L TR LTR Volume, v (vph) 63 129 29 39 115 Capacity, cm (vph) 1102 1086 92 368 306 /c ratio 0.06 0.12 0.32 0.11 0.38 Queue length (95%) 0.18 0.40 1.33 0.35 1.77 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.5 8.8 61.9 15.9 27.6 LOS A A F C D Approach delay (s/veh) -- - 35.5 27.6 pproach LOS -- -- E D HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f file://C:\Documents and Settings\lisius.TCE\Local Settings\Temp\u2kE 1 A.tmp 8/24/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY keneral Information ISite Information Analyst AAL Agency/Co. Trudell Consulting Engineers Date Performed 812412007 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Intersection Rimball Ave/Community East Jurisdiction South Burlington, VT Analysis Year 2013 No Build Project Description Technology Park - 2000048 East/West Street: Kimball Ave North/South Street: Community East Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 67 379 81 97 442 44 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 67 379 81 97 442 44 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 - - 2 - Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 24 6 26 21 21 72 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h) 24 6 26 21 21 72 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 2 5 5 5 3 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N y Storage 1 1 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 10 1 0 Confi uration L I I TR LTR Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L L TR LTR Volume, v (vph) 67 97 24 32 114 Capacity, cm (vph) 1077 1101 103 394 366 /c ratio 0.06 0.09 0.23 0.08 0.31 Queue length (95%) 0.20 0.29 0.89 0.26 1.34 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.6 8.6 50.5 14.9 23.5 LOS A A F B C Approach delay (s/veh) -- - 30.2 23.5 Approach LOS - -- D C HC$2000TM Copyright V 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f file://C:\Documents and Settings\lisius.TCE\Local Settings\Temp\u2kE83.tmp 8/24/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY keneral Information ISite Information nal st AAL enc /Co. Trudel/ Consulting Engineers Date Performed 812412007 nal sis Time Period AM Peak Intersection Kimball Avel Community East Jurisdiction South Burlington, VT Analysis Year 2013 Build Project Description Technology Park - 2000048 East/West Street: Kimball Ave North/South Street: Community East Intersection Orientation: East-West[Study Period hrs : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 67 379 117 128 442 44 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h) 67 379 117 128 442 44 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 - 2 - Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 29 8 31 21 28 72 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 29 8 31 21 28 72 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 2 5 5 5 T 3 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N y Storage 1 1 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR LTR Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L L TR LTR Volume, v (vph) 67 128 29 39 121 Capacity, cm (vph) 1077 1068 81 348 282 /c ratio 0.06 0.12 0.36 0.11 0.43 Queue length (95%) 0.20 0.41 1.58 0.38 2.19 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.6 8.8 73.7 16.6 31.3 LOS A A F C D pproach delay (s/veh) -- -- 41.0 31.3 pproach LOS - -- E D HCS2000TM Copyright ® 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f file://C:\Documents and Settings\lisius.TCE\Loca1 Settings\Temp\u2kEIA.tmp 8/24/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Leneral Information ISite Information Analyst AAL Agency/Co. Trudell Consulting Engineers Date Performed 812412007 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection Kimball Ave/Community East Jurisdiction South Burlington, VT Analysis Year 2008 No Build Project Description Technology Park - 2000048 East/West Street: Kimball Ave North/South Street: Community East Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 38 438 31 34 474 21 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 38 438 31 34 474 21 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 2 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 99 16 102 43 22 104 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 99 16 102 43 22 104 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 2 5 5 5 3 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N y Storage 1 1 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 Configuration L I I TR LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L L TR LTR Volume, v (vph) 38 34 99 118 169 Capacity, cm (vph) 1069 1093 126 472 327 /c ratio 0.04 0.03 0.79 0.25 0.52 Queue length (95%) 0.11 0.10 7.18 0.99 3.09 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.5 8.4 119.3 15.2 27.6 LOS A A F C D pproach delay (s/veh) -- -- 62.7 27.6 pproach LOS -- - F D HCS2000Tm Copyright ® 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f file://C:\Documents and Settings\lisius.TCE\Local Settings\Temp\u2kEIA.tmp 8/24/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Leneral Information ISite Information nat st AAL enc /Co. Trudell Consulting Engineers Date Performed 812412007 nal sis Time Period PM Peak Project Description Technology Park - 2000048 East/West Street: Kimball Ave Intersection Orientation: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Movement 1 2 L T Volume veh/h 38 438 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 38 438 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 Median type RT Channelized? Lanes > 1 Configuration L Upstream Signal 0 Minor Street Northbound Movement 7 8 L T Volume veh/h 137 21 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h) 137 21 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 2 Percent grade (%) 0 Flared approach N Storage 1 RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 Configuration L Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Movement 1 4 Lane Configuration L L Volume, v (vph) 38 40 Capacity, cm (vph) 1069 1087 /c ratio 0.04 0.04 Queue length (95%) 0.11 0.11 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.5 8.4 LOS A A Approach delay (s/veh) - - pproach LOS -- -- IICS2000TM Intersection iqmbafi Ave/Community East Jurisdiction South Burlin ton, VT Analysis Year 2008 Build South Street: Con Period (hrs): 1.00 3 4 R L 37 40 1.00 1.00 37 40 - 2 Undivided 0 0 1 TR L 9 10 R L 126 43 1.00 1.00 126 43 5 1 5 0 0 0 TR Northbound 7 8 9 L TR 137 147 121 462 1.13 0.32 18.88 1.39 427.3 16.4 F C 214.6 F Copyright ® 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved East Westbound 5 6 T R 474 21 1.00 1.00 474 21 L - 1 0 TR 0 Southbound 11 12 T R 24 104 1.00 1.00 24 104 5 3 0 y 1 0 1 0 L TR Southbound 10 11 12 L TR 171 295 0.58 3.89 33.7 D 33.7 D Version 4.1 f file://C:\Documents and Settings\lisius.TCE\Local Settings\Temp\u2kElA.tmp 8/24/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information[Site Information Analyst AAL Agency/Co. Trudell Consulting Engineers Date Performed 812412007 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Project Description Technology Park - 2000048 East/West Street: Kimball Ave Intersection Orientation: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Movement 1 2 L T Volume veh/h 40 463 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 40 463 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 Median type RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 Configuration L Upstream Signal 0 Minor Street Northbound volume venm Peak -hour factor, PHF Hourly Flow Rate vehl Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv Percent grade (%) Flared approach Storage RT Channelized? Lanes Configuration Control Delay, Queue Approach Movement Lane Configuration Volume, v (vph) Capacity, cm (vph) /c ratio Queue length (95%) Control Delay (s/veh) LOS dela LOS HCS2000TM 1 1 L Level of Service EB WB 1 4 L L 40 33 1042 1070 0.04 0.03 0.12 0.10 8.6 8.5 A A Intersection Kimball Ave/Community East Jurisdiction South Burlington, VT Analysis Year 2013 No Build South Street: Con Period (hrs): 1.00 3 4 R L 31 33 1.00 1.00 31 33 2 Undivided 0 0 1 TR L 9 10 R L 101 45 1.00 1.00 101 45 5 5 0 0 0 TR Northbound 7 8 9 L TR 98 117 111 449 0.88 0.26 9.30 1.05 182.3 15.8 F C 91.7 F Copyright ® 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved East Westbound 5 6 T R 502 23 1.00 1.00 502 23 0 1 0 TR 0 Southbound 11 12 T R 22 110 1.00 1.00 22 110 5 3 0 y 1 0 1 0 L TR Southbound 10 11 12 LTR 177 302 0.59 3.99 33.4 D 33.4 D Version 4.1 f file://C:\Documents and Settings\lisius.TCE\Local Settings\Temp\u2kEIA.tmp 8/24/2007 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst AAL Agency/Co. Trudell Consulting Engineers Date Performed 812412007 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection Kimball Avel Community East Jurisdiction South Burlington, VT Analysis Year 2013 Build Project Description Technology Park - 2000048 East/West Street: Kimball Ave North/South Street: Community East Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 1.00 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 40 463 37 39 502 23 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 40 463 37 39 502 23 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 - - 2 - - Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 136 21 125 45 24 110 Peak -hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 136 21 125 45 24 110 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 2 2 5 5 5 3 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N y Storage 1 1 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration L TR LTR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L L TR LTR Volume, v (vph) 40 39 136 146 179 Capacity, cm (vph) 1042 1064 107 439 272 /c ratio 0.04 0.04 1.27 0.33 1 0.66 Queue length (95%) 0.12 0.11 23.27 1.48 5.19 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.6 8.5 652.0 17.3 42.7 LOS A A F C E pproach delay (s/veh) -- -- 323.4 1 42.7 [Approach LOS -- -- F I E HCS2000TM Copyright 02003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 f file://C:\Documents and Settings\lisius.TCE\Local Settings\Temp\u2kElA.tmp 8/24/2007 TM Kimball Community East.xls Intersection: Kimball Ave S Community East Time: 4:15-5:15 PM 1184 42% of Total Grili Driva 245 9% of Total 169 75 e9% SB 31% NB NORTH 1041 221 43 12 11 100 Kimball Ave 677 57% SUB 38 r TOTAL TRIPS= 2946 1 507 438 2 ---► 43% EB 31 3 R f 87 29% of Total Community East 2008 NO BUILD SCENARIO Kimball Ave EB E8 EB WB WB WB NB NB N@ 3B $B ^,LB L T R L I T R L I T R L T R 1 2 3 4 6 a r a a to 11 12 38 1 438 1 31 34 1 474 1 21 99 1 16 1 102 1 43 22 f04 NOTE DISTRIBUTION PATTERN BASED ON ANALOGY TO SHORT COUNT TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 08_NO_BUILD PM TM Kimball Community Easl.xls Intersection: Kimball Ave 3 Community East Time: 4:15-5:15 PM Gregory Drive 252 8% of Total 171 80 08% SB 32% NO 1041 241 43 NORTH 12 11 10 Kimball Ave 715 56% wB r TOTAL TRIPS= 3008 41% a1% 38 1 of Total 513 438 2 - - 42% EB 37 3 y 7 9 1 1371 21 101 2B5 26% SB 74% NB 386 13% of Total G mm�ry nfVM.- Community East 48% WB FTTI2 39% 583 of Total 52% EB 2008 BUILD SCENARIO ES 9B EB WB WB WEI NB NB NB ,S_B SiB Sib L T R L T R L I T R L T R 1 2 3 4 6 a 1 a a to 11 12 38 1 438 1 37 40 1 474 1 21 137 1 21 1 126 43 24 T 104 NOTE DISTRIBUTION PATTERN BASED ON ANALOGY TO SHORT COUNT TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 08_BUILD PM 824/2007 12:09 PM we 1142 3W. 607 of Total 8/242007 12:09 PM TM Kimball Community East.xls Intersection: Kimball Ave & Community East Time: 4.15-5:15 PM 1245 42% of Total Gregory Drive 256 9% of Total 178 79 o9% SB 31% NB 1101 221 45 NORTH 12 11 10 Kimball Ave �/ 1 710 57X WB r TOTAL TRIPS= 2969 40 1 534 4632 --� 43% EB 31 3 I } 86 I 215 2W. SB 71% NB 301 1D% of Total Community East of %Mh.mew 2013 NO BUILD SCENARIO EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB L T R L I T R L I T R L I T R 1 1 9 4 6 b 7 e Y 10 11 12 40 1 463 1 31 33 1 502 1 23 96 1 16 1 101 45 1 22 1 110 NOTE DISTRIBUTION PATTERN BASED ON ANALOGY TO SHORT COUNT TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 13_NO_BUILD PM Intersection: Kimball Ave & Community East Time: 4:15-5:15 PM 1289 41% of Total TM Kimball Community Easl.xls Gregory Drive 263 8% of Total 180 84 68% SB 32%NB 1101 241 45 NORTH 12 11 10 Kimball Ave f 1 748 58% WB / TOTAL TRIPS= 3131 L�nar.:srrrtaTn. nr..r-r 100 1 zaz 26% SB 74% NB 382 12% of Total Community East WB 1168 39% 610 of Total 52% EB 2013 BUILD SCENARIO EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB $B $B 0 L T R L I T R L I T R L I T R 1 2 9 6 a 7 e s to 11 12 40 1 463 1 37 39 1 502 1 23 136 1 21 1 125 45 1 24 1 110 NOTE DISTRIBUTION PATTERN BASED ON ANALOGY TO SHORT COUNT TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 13_BUILD PM 634 53% ES 8/242007 12:09 PM 1198 38N. of Total 8/242007 12:09 PM l TM Kimball Community East.xls Intersection: Kimball Ave 8 Community East Time: 7:15-8:15 AM 1013 41% of Total G Driw 220 9% of Total 109 111 50% SB 50% NB NORTH 681 211 19 12 11 10 Kimball Ave r 1 \,. 510 till% WB ' TOTAL TRIPS- 24U 63 t 503 358 2 -► 50% ES 82 3 Jr / I 7 a 9 201 1 57 70% SB 22% NB 258 11% of Total Community East Summary nf VOIufnNS 2008 NO BUILD SCENARIO we 961 39% 404 of Total 42% ES E@ E@ E@ M M M n 010 0 Ti L T R L I T R L In T R L T R 1 2 ] 4 5 a 7 a Y 10 11 12 63 358 82 98 1 417 1 42 24 1 6 1 26 19 1 21 1 68 NOTE DISTRIBUTION PATTERN BASED ON ANALOGY TO SHORT COUNT TauOUL CONsuLTa40 LWANUMS 08_NO_BUILD AM Intersection: Kimball Ave 8 Community East Time: 7:15-8:15 AM 1054 40% Of Total TM Kimball Community East.xls 9% of Total 116 113 51% SB 49% NB NORTH 68 28 19 12 11 10 Kimball Ave r I 515 49% WO t TOTAL TRIPS- 63 1 2624 539 358 2 -► 51% ES 1183 275 I 69 So% SB 20% NB 344 13% of Total Community East Tz M vej, a 2008 BUILD SCENARIO 8242007 12:09 PM wB FWD 38% 409 of Total EB E0 aim M 1w n T M0 0 0 L T R L T R L T R L T R 1 2 2 4 6 a 7 ! a /a /t 12 63 358 118 129 417 42 29 1 8 1 31 19 1 28 68 NOTE DISTRIBUTION PATTERN BASED ON ANALOGY TO SHORT COUNT TauoELL CC*M LTM WrANUMS 08_BUILD AM 8n4200712:09 PM TM Kimball Community East.xls Intersection: Kimball Ave d Community East Time: 7:15-8:15 AM 1065 42% of Total Greq2y Drive 231 9% of Total 114 117 49% SB 51% NB NORTH 721 211 21 12 11 100 Kimball Ave 1 1 y 538 51% We 1 TOTAL TRIPS= 2560 67 1 527 379 2 —► 49% EB 81 3 Jr 199 9 56 78% SB 22% NB 255 10% of Total Community East 2013 NO BUILD SCENARIO Kimball Ave 61 44 �— 5 442 583 41 971 58% WB 1009 39% 426 of Total 42% EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SB L T R L I T R L I T R L 1 T R 1 2 3 e 5 e r e u m ii iz 67 379 1 81 97 1 442 1 44 24 6 26 21 1 21 72 NOTE DISTRIBUTION PATTERN BASED ON ANALOGY TO SHORT COUNT TSUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 13_NO_BUILD AM Intersection: Kimball Ave 8 Community East Time: 7:15-8:15 AM 1106 40% of Total TM Kimball Community East.xls Gregory Drive 240 9% of Total 121 119 50% SB 50% NB 721 281 21 NORTH 12 11 10 Kimball Ave 1 1 y 543 49% WB r TOTAL TRIPS= 2732 9�T1 7 8 I 273 t 68 80% SB 20% NB 341 12% of Total Community East M VM'mom 2013 BUILD SCENARIO 8/24/2007 12:09 PM WB 1045 38% 431 of Total 41% EB EB EB EB WB WB WB NB NB NB SB SB SIB L T R L I T R L I T R L I T R 1 z 3 e 5 e r e r io 11 iz 67 1 379 1 117 128 1 442 1 44 29 1 8 1 31 21 1 28 72 NOTE DISTRIBUTION PATTERN BASED ON ANALOGY TO SHORT COUNT TaUDUL CONSULTING LNGtNUX5 13_BUILD AM 8/242007 12:09 PM =- O/� 1-7 Ion y %-C G /L G -7L /� % /� ,/ ,") rVI A C / P/ 1 /P 1 7 S N Io ✓ L Iw / I C.i ✓ _ f/ /� G/ � G Y / l/ S'1 !� L.(J �O C, %, 0i� v-f �•tlQ�e r u/�� s� �'� Y' y - h5O � `�4✓ ��e5e �i��•�S � q?'/e4s� ,5 �er�„ QcJ T G/ y �i7 � a 5 C 5 �$ �z u% C4 /S b G 3. r~Vic c �v �vi/�/./�f .s �// '000'c s •� � 1 � � c � r4 �-e. / �ejv aYZ ��-e l-ss -,z '40 v 14 lt�v4�/vr-7 u S r S G �� G y' /. G b y �e S/ �`� v b ,fi t; ci G e- CS .S �70/,./� /7 cjy J u C. i� 4 �/ / / , Gl Y&/t 1-7 _u / o ✓e J1 � • 4rn 4�� 1e5 �� ie�s� C�C.� 01� e-�wYtii� Gi'CGcSS�5 /c/ra��.�� Ar„�s �v//J_5Aa1(.�c�4�,xGee� 300-�ce�_ J �¢7f, f�S EXCG-Irdk", g vejo -I/-/ �• �j/�/ G � ! Ue�GI�1�/ Q /7 !�1— s Se 017 4 v' ; d rs s , Y I e . r 5j r/� w oCl J� tS X ,2:2, 1 / /7 ci e ro s /a e r .�'v -� -� v cc) ct v, G/ )--a ev v n" --Y"j ' / / -�� w c✓� �/ �� e U 4 s; d e,1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: September 26, 2007 \drb\sub\TechPark\siteplan_kimballAveLot.doc Plans received: September 18, 2007 enda #17 Technology Park SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SP-07-67 Meeting Date: September 4, 2007 Owner Technology Park Associates Inc. Axinn Vermont Inc PMF Energy INC 30 Community Drive S. Burlington, VT 05407 En-gineer/Surveyor Propertv Information Jennifer A. Desautels Tax Parcel 0436-00030 Trudell Consulting Engineers Volume 388, Page 117 PO Box 308 Mixed Industrial/Commercial District Williston, VT 05495 177.2 acres Location Map CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\techpark\siteplan Kimball Avedoc Technology Park Partners, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting site plan review for a 54,459 sq. ft. general office building, Community Drive. Associate Planner Cathyann La Rose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on September 18, 2007 and have the following comments. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements Table 1. Dimensional ReauiremPntc IC Zoning District Min. Lot Size Required/Limit 40,000 SF Pro osed 5.0 acres Max. Building Covera e 40% 8.3% Max. Overall Coverage 70% 42% �l Min. Front Setback 30 ft. Approx 400 ft Max Front Yard Covera e 30% 16.3% Min. Side Setback 10 ft. 25 ft Min. Rear Setback 30 ft. Approx 55 ft •� Maximum Building Height 35 ft (flat roof) 50 ft + Waiver Required The applicant is proposing a building height of 50 feet. Given the relative location of the building and the subject parcel, staff has no concerns regarding the proposed height and fully supports a 15 foot height waiver. 1. The Board grants a building height waiver of fifteen (15) feet. SUBDIVISION CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations subdivisions should comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public water system should be extended so as to provide the necessary quantity of water, at acceptable pressure. The South Burlington Water Department Superintendent has reviewed the plans and issued comments in a letter dated September 17, 2007 (attached). The applicant shall adhere to the comments referenced herein; the plans shall be revised accordingly. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\techpark\siteplan Kimball Avedoc 2. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the City of South Burlington Water Department per the letter dated September 17, 2007. The plans shall be revised accordingly. . 3. The applicant shall obtain final wastewater allocation approval from the Director of Planning and Zoning, Juli Beth Hinds, prior to issuance of the zoning permit. According to Section 15.13 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the subdivider or developer should connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. The City Engineer has reviewed the plans and issued comments in a memo dated September 27, 2007 (enclosed). The applicant should comply with the requests of the City Engineer; the plans shall be revised accordingly. 4. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the South Burlington City Engineer per the memo dated September 27, 2007; the plans shall be revised accordingly prior to recording the mylar. Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The City of South Burlington Stormwater Superintendent reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memo dated August 27, 2007. The applicant has replied to the Stormwater Superintendent and has provided answers to the questions previously outlined. Furthermore, staff understands that the project will require review by the appropriate State stormwater authorities. Staff is not concerned about the stormwater treatment aspects of the plan but recommends that the applicant continue to work with the South Burlington Stormwater Superintendent as work progresses. 5. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan should meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The South Burlington Stormwater Superintendent shall visit the site as construction progresses to ensure compliance with this criterion. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. The applicant is proposing to access the new building via a 26' wide private access road that connects to the eastern leg of Community Drive. This road will be accompanied to the south by a five (5) foot wide concrete sidewalk. The private road shall remain private. Legal documents (in the form of a private road agreement) shall be submitted, reviewed, and recorded to ensure that this is the case. 6. The applicant shall submit a private road agreement which shall ensure that the proposed private road remains private. This document shall be reviewed by the City Attorney and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records prior to permit issuance. At this time, staff does not have any concerns regarding the circulation or traffic management. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING ldrb\subltechpark\siteplan Kimball Avedoc The proposed 54,459 square feet of general office space is estimated to produce 139.8 PM peak hour vehicle trip ends. The property was previously granted 647 trip ends. 404.17 vehicle trip ends are allocated to the building at 30 Community Drive. 159.5 vehicle trip ends are allocated to the building at 55 Community Drive, for a total of 703.47 vehicle trip ends. Therefore, the proposed building will exceed the permitted number of vehicle trip ends by 56.47 vehicle trip ends. Staff has no concerns at this time regarding the total number of trip ends, nor does Staff feel that a new traffic study is required. However, the applicant shall pay for the increased trip ends, minus any credits as determined by the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance. 7. The PUD shall be granted an additional 56.47 vehicle trip ends, the applicant shall pay for these trip ends accordingly. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The plans that the applicant submitted depict a significant amount of wetlands on the subject property. The applicant is proposing to encroach into a delineated Class II wetland buffer. The applicant has submitted a Conditional Use Determination which was issued from the State in 2003 and subsequently re -approved several times, most recently for the period from March 26, 2006 to April 12, 2009, for a previously proposed building. The applicant has stated that the degree of wetland and buffer impact is no greater than was originally granted in the CUD. The applicant has relocated the dumpster facility out of the wetland buffer, and is proposing significant vegetative screening to delineate the wetland buffer. Staff is pleased with the proposed plan and finds that this criterion is being met to the best ability of the applicant. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. Staff feels that the proposed project is in keeping with the planned development patterns of the IC Zoning District. Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. Major portions of the PUD are undevelopable due to wetland constraints. These undevelopable areas will serve as open spaces between adjoining parcels. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The South Burlington Fire Chief has only briefly reviewed the plans and has stated that there are no major concerns with the layout of the building and the location of hydrants. However, he would like to reserve the right to provide comment with respect to the siting of lockboxes and other safety devices within the building. 8. The South Burlington Fire Chief should review the plans and provide comments with respect to internal safety mechanisms. The applicant shall adhere to these comments. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\techpark\siteplan Kimball Avedoc Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. At this time there is a 20 foot recreation path easement to the City of South Burlington that runs along Kimball Avenue. The applicant is proposing to construct a 10 foot paved recreation path within this easement that extends for most of the length of the parcel along Kimball Avenue. The Recreation Path Committee has met with the applicant and discussed the plans. Their previous concern regarding access to the road from the path has been addressed. A sidewalk is shown to connect the proposed recreation path to the new private access drive. Staff finds that this will encourage connection to the proposed building from the public right of way of Kimball Ave. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. There are several major issues with the roads, sidewalks, and utilities which exist for the site; however, they are being discussed and adequately handled as part of a related subdivision application. There are no issues at this time related to the proposed private access road. 9. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications should be underground. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed development of this property is in conformance with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. Landscaping The applicant has submitted a proposed landscaping plan. The City Arborist is reviewing the proposed landscaping plan and provided comments in a memo dated September 28, 2007. Staff has discussed the plans with the Arborist and he is generally agreeable to the plans, provided that the trees which are proposed in the City's right- of-way along Kimball Avenue and in the 20 foot recreation path easement are included in a maintenance agreement to be drafted as part of the easement documents. He has also verbally stated a concern that the trees proposed at the corner of Community Drive and Kimball Avenue may pose a site distance problem for the vehicles exiting Community Drive as they reach maturity. 10. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the City Arborist per the memo dated September 28, 2007. The plans shall be revised accordingly. Pursuant to Section 13.06(A) of the Land Development Regulations, landscaping and screening shall be required for all uses subject to site plan and PUD review. Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations requires parking facilities to be curbed and landscaped with appropriate trees, shrubs, and other plants including ground covers. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\techpark\siteplan Kimball Avedoc Pursuant to Section 13.06(B)(4) of the Land Development Regulations, snow storage areas must be shown on the plans. Snow storage areas are shown on the plans and have been deemed to be satisfactory by the Stormwater Superintendent. Landscaping budget requirements are to be determined pursuant to Section 13.06(G)(2) of the SBLDR. The landscape plan and landscape budget shall be prepared by a landscape architect or professional landscape designer. Based on an estimated building cost of $4.3 million and pursuant to Table 13-9 of the SBLDR, the applicant shall provide a minimum of $50,500 in landscaping. The applicant is proposing over $164,000 in trees and shrubs. This criterion is clearly met. The proposed parking areas contain more than twenty-eight (28) parking spaces, and therefore must be landscaped in accordance with Section 13.06(B) of the Land Development Regulations. The site plan shows proposed landscaping on the interior of the proposed parking area and the applicant has submitted information to ensure that this criterion is being met, as 10.88% of the internal parking area is composed of landscaped islands. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Section 13.01(G)(5) requires that bicycle parking or storage facilities are provided for employees, residents, and visitors to the site. A bicycle rack is appropriately located on the plans. Pursuant to Section 13.01(B) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed 54,459 square feet of general office use will require 191 parking spaces, including 6 handicapped -accessible parking spaces. The plans depict 191 parking spaces, including 6 handicapped -accessible. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The applicant is proposing to locate all 191 parking spaces to the front of the building. This is not in compliance with the regulations. The applicant argues that the location of the power lines and related easement on the northern portion of the property makes it impossible to locate the building up front. Staff agrees that the location of the power lines makes this impractical. The Board discussed this issue at a previous hearing (minutes attached) and it was agreed that the parking could remain as proposed. The applicant is proposing significant landscaping- in terms of quantity and in monetary value- between Kimball Avenue and the parking lot. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. The height of the proposed building is 50', which is over the 35' maximum height for flat roofs for the City. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a 15 foot height waiver. Staff has already stated their support of the height waiver. The applicant has submitted a preliminary rendering of the building. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\techpark\siteplan Kimball Avedoc Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. The applicant has submitted sufficient building elevations. The proposed building will be similar to the existing buildings in the subdivision. Staff finds it to be a very visually appealing building. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. The applicant has submitted sufficient building elevations. The proposed building will be similar to the existing buildings in the subdivision. Again, it appears to be a very aesthetically appealing building. In addition to the above general review standards site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. Staff has already addressed the issue of the proposed access to the property. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans depict a proposed enclosed dumpster at the west side of the building, located outside of the Class II wetland buffer. Lighting Pursuant to Appendix A.9 of the Land Development Regulations, luminaries shall not be placed more than 30' above ground level and the maximum illumination at ground level shall not CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\techpark\siteplan Kimball Avedoc exceed an average of three (3) foot candles. Pursuant to Appendix A.10(b) of the Land Development Regulations, indirect glare produced by illumination at ground level shall not exceed 0.3 foot candles maximum, and an average of 0.1 foot candles average. All lighting shall be shielded and downcast. The applicant has submitted a lighting point by point plan and lighting cut sheets which are appropriate and meet the guidelines of the SBLDR (the cut sheets are somewhat vague in this matter; however, the applicant's engineer has submitted a memo which is acceptable to staff and which states that the lights are indeed shielded). Other The applicant has included a statement from their engineer that the proposed sewage pumping station meets the City's pump station design criteria. The applicant has submitted a proposed street name for the newly proposed access road. However, the Planning Commission has not accepted the proposal and has asked the applicant to propose another name. 11. The plans shall be revised to remove the street name from all sheets. Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Site Plan Application #SP-07-67 subject to the conditional numbered items included in the comments section of this report. Respectfully submitted, �*',. -" Cathyann La Rose, Associate Planner Copy to: John Illick, Technology Park Associates, applicant Jennifer A. Desautels, Trudell Consulting Engineers I � SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW B D Minutes � SEPTEMBER 4, 2007 uhftfp2,w�t f Mr. Matosky noted the owners of the area are very proud of the landscaping. Rather than standard street trees they would like to do something similar to lot 7 where landscaping is part of the landscaping plan for the lot. Mr. Belair noted the applicant agreed to plant street trees in the original approval. Mr. Behr said he liked what was done on Lot #7 and would want certainty that it would continue. 10. Sketch Plan Application #SD-07-52 of Technology Park Partners for a planned unit development to construct a 54,459 sq. ft. general office building on a lot currently developed with a 275,000 sq. ft. mixed use building, 30 Community Drive: Mr. Belair noted this is being applied for as a PUD because there is no lot there now. Mr. Matosky said they are still proposing a lot with coverages, and if it makes more sense to apply for a 2-lot subdivision, they will. Mr. Hall said that if the overall subdivision goes through, there is no issue. Ms. LaRose said there is a question as to whether the new footprint will require a new CUD. Mr. Matosky said he will check on that. The impacted area is identical or less. Mr. Belair said the Board may have concern with the impact on the Class 2 wetland buffer. He added that obtaining a CUD from the State is not an automatic approval from the DRB. Mr. Hall said the Agency had determined there is no function of the wetland to protect. Mr. Matosky said the stormwater system has been redesigned and fully compliant with the standards. Roof runoff requires no treatment and must be retained. The only runoff that goes into the wetland is roof runoff. If there is a concern with that, it can be looked into. He said he would discuss it with Mr. DiPietro. Ms. LaRose said there may be other staff requests to delineate the wetland to keep people out of it. Mr. Dinklage suggested that wetland concerns be settled before preliminary plat. Mr. Hall said they have a time issue and will go to preliminary at their own risk. Mr. Dinklage raised a question regarding a sidewalk down the landscaped area in the middle and how people would get to the building in winter. Mr. Matosky said they have bigger parking lots with no sidewalks. They will put a sidewalk in front of the building. Mr. Matosky said they have always had the intent to have a varying undulating terrain on Kimball Avenue; however, there is no berm in the right-of-way. Mr. Belair noted there is grading in the right-of-way. Mr. Matosky said that is just to "make it clean." Mr. Belair said he will check with Public Works on this. Mr. Matosky said they feel it is important to site the building as they have with a centralized green. Members felt that was a nice look. -5- I � SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Minutes SEPTEMBER 4, 2007 Mr. Belair said that unless they have a solid berm, they will see signific He felt there should be mitigation, and tree trunks don't work. Mr. Matosky said he di n t feel that would look natural or right. Ms. LaRose said she would like to see how many evergreens there will be. Mr. Cimonetti noted that construction on lot 2 triggers 2500 feet of rec path. For the Rec Path Committee to give any advice, they need some detail as to what the rec path is planned to do east and west of lot #2. Mr. Cimonetti stressed that the path shouldn't be isolated at the extreme east and west. There has to be something to bring people to Kimball Avenue. Members were OK with the 50-foot building (requiring a 15 foot height waiver). Mr. Belair questioned the location of the dumpster. Ms. LaRose felt it should be as far from the wetland as possible. Mr. Matosky said they will consider this. Mr. Dinklage stressed that water generated from the sump pump cannot go into the city sewer system. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 10:00 P.M. Clerk Date M Technology Park Lot 2 Trudell Consulting Engineers LA SE Group 9/28/07 Conceptual Plan Overall the plan looks good with a few minor recommendations • I recommend using continuous planting pits filled with quality planting soil to a depth of 2 ft. in the parking lot islands to provide adequate rooting area for the trees • On Plat L1.0 recommend moving the line of Pin Oaks on the north edge of the parking lot back 3-4 feet to avoid conflicts with underground utilities • Recommend moving or eliminating some of the shrubs(mainly dogwoods) that are planted directly under the trees so they are further from the trunk and root ball of the trees • Crabapples near the corner of Kimball and Community Dr should be relocated so they don't obstruct sight lines for vehicles turning on to Kimball Ave CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON PUBLIC WORKS 104 LANDFILL ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802) 658-7961 X 103 FAX # 802-658-7976 MAILING ADDRESS 575DORSET ST. CRAIG LAMBERT SO. BURLINGTON,VT 05408 PUBLIC WORKS ARBORIST e-mail clambert@sburl.com Bill Szymanski, City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4106 Technology Park Lot 2 Kimball Ave. September 27, 2007 1. Sidewalk typical section no. 8 on sheet D5 is missing 2. Planting plans L1.0, 1-1.1, and 1-1.2 shall clearly show location of water and sewer lines. Large trees shall be clear of these lines by at least 5 feet. Outside lighting bases shall also clear these utilities by at least 5 feet. 3. Gas main service to building shall be shown on the plans. 4. The engineer (Trudell) shall accurately prepare the as built drawings; not the builder or contractor. 5. Cover sheet should have lot numbers and location of sheets SP2, SP3, P1, P2, and P3. 6. Sewer manholes must be accessible to mobile cleaning and flushing equipment. Manholes No. 6 & 7 will be difficult to access. 7. The new access drive grade may be increased for better drainage and eliminate about 200 feet of flat grade. Or vertical curve length shortened. 8. Distance between access points (manholes, inlets, etc.) on sewer and drainage lines shall not exceed 300 feet. Plans show lengths exceeding 400 feet. 9. Typical detail references on plan sheets do not agree with details on plans D1- D6. 10. Access drive width on SP3 is 26 feet. On typical section it is 24 feet. 11. Sidewalk shall have a cross slope of 1/4 inch per foot toward road or in fill toward the outside. September 17, 2007 Trudell Consulting Engineers P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 RE: Technology Park, Lot 2 Dear Sir or Madam: The South Burlington Water Department has reviewed the plans for the above referenced project. Please find my comments below. 1. The attached Application for Water Allocation must be completed and returned to the South Burlington Water Department as soon as possible. As this project continues, the Application for Water Allocation will need final approval from this Department, which will be contingent upon available water storage capabilities within the City. 2. Based upon the final water allocation request, water service fees shall be applied to the project based on the current Rate and Fee Schedule. It must be recognized by all developers that the Rate and Fee Schedule established by the South Burlington City Council may be modified by resolution at an open meeting of the City Council, and therefore subject to change prior to completion of the project. 3. All construction drawings and plans shall have a note saying "All water line and related work to be performed in accordance with the Champlain Water District Specifications and Details for the Installation of Water lines and Appurtenances henceforth the '`CWD Specification." 4. The CWD Specifications are applicable to all new construction and reconstruction of water infrastructure. Variations from the CWD Specifications will not be permitted except as provided within the CWD Specifications. The appropriate CWD Supervisor as defined in the CWD Specifications shall determine the acceptability of any deviation from the those specifications. Private water lines and appurtenances shall be designed to the same standards as public water lines and appurtenances. All water installation work and water distribution material must comply with the "CWD Specifications". Details for this project must be the same as those within the above referenced CWD Specifications. 5. The project shall be constructed, completed, maintained, and operated in accordance with the approved plans. No changes shall be made in the project without the written approval of the appropriate CWD supervisor. A copy of the final approved plans shall be submitted to the Department prior to construction of the water system improvements. 6. The applicant, developer or owner of record shall procure all permits, licenses, and easements that may be required to complete planned construction, including payment of all applicable fees, and shall comply with all conditions set forth in each permit. 7. All domestic services and fire sprinkler systems that are connected to the public water system shall be protected with a backflow prevention assembly, and an appropriate thermal expansion system in compliance with the Ordinance For The Control Of Cross Connections Within The Water System Of the City Of South Burlington, henceforth the "Backflow Ordinance." Please contact this department for more information on the installation and proper setting of backflow prevention devices. 8. The above referenced CWD Specifications state that no water lines shall be installed after November 15 or before April 1 without prior approval of the Superintendent. The appropriate CWD Supervisor may restrict work before November 15 and after April 1 during adverse weather conditions. 9. Eight -inch and larger Ductile Iron (DI) water pipe shall have no less than three (3) brass wedges installed at each joint. Bury depth to the new mains shall be six feet (6') to the top of the pipe. DI water pipe shall be Class 52, cement lined. Soil corrosiveness testing is required for this DI water main installation or the pipe shall be polyethylene pipe sleeve encased. 10. Stainless Steel Tapping sleeves shall be used on Asbestos Cement (AC), Cast Iron (CI), Ductile Iron (DI) and PVC C900 distribution mains. Sleeves shall be Powerseal Model 3490MJ Stainless Steel tap sleeve with mechanical joint outlet, or approved equal. 11. Sheet Specific Comments: a. SP2: The four-way intersecting eight -inch water lines shall be connected through a "cross". Cross sections (four-way intersections) shall have a minimum of four (4) gate valves secured to the cross with the use of "Foster Adapters" and retainer glands to the adjoining pipe. All gate valves shall be made from a corrosion resistant material, and all valve bolts, studs and nuts shall be made from corrosion resistant materials. b. SP2: All water lines outside the City ROW shall be considered private and subject to all requirements stated below. The water line within this private access road shall be considered private. c. SP2: The water line into the proposed building may be reduced to six- inch right after the most western hydrant tee. An 8"x6" reducer and six- inch gate valve should be secured to the hydrant tee. d. SP2: Two 45-degree bends shall be installed on the six-inch water line that turns into the building, instead of the 90-degree bend shown. e. SP2: An insertion valve shall not be installed on the existing ten -inch water main. Instead, the main shall be shut down and a new ten -inch resilient wedge gate valve cut into the existing main. This will require the temporary water interruption to the buildings currently connected to this water main. f. SP3: The existing water main is currently located outside the City ROW as shown on these plans. A 20' easement must be prepared to deed the existing water main to the City, centered directly over the water main. Please contact me if you need additional information regarding easement requirements. g. P2: The existing water main on Kimball Ave as noted near Sta. 17+00 is the CWD 24" Transmission Main. h. DI: Please correct all Details to correspond to the above referenced "CWD Specifications", including the Typical Tapping Valve, Typical Water Trench, Blow Off, Fire Protection Hydrant, and Testing Water Mains and Hydrants. i. D5: Please see my comments in "e" above regarding Insert Valves. j. L1.0: Generally, trees and shrubs shall not be placed over any water main or service line, nor placed within 20' of any appurtenance, including fire hydrants. Trees must be moved off the water main located in the 60" Wide utility Easement to the City. 12. Mechanical joint restraints with twist off nuts shall be EBAA or Sigma, or approved equal. 13. Looping of all water lines shall be a design requirement. All looping connections shall be at a point so as to eliminate any dead ends on any water main. 14. Water main extensions shall be continuous to the furthest property line of the project. 15. It is a violation to discharge chlorinated water into waters of the state. All water used during flushing and testing of the new main must be dechlorinated prior to entering any water of the state. 16. The South Burlington Water Department ordinance states that "All water lines and appurtenances not located in the City right-of-way or public grounds shall be considered private pursuant to the ordinance and others of the City," and; 17. "The Department shall not maintain any water lines that have not formally been accepted by the City, except in subdivisions that are designed to Department specifications and are intended to be accepted," and; 18. "All water lines and appurtenances located within an area so designated as restricted or private by the developer shall be considered private." 19. Historically, the South Burlington Water Department has practiced overseeing the repair and maintenance of all water mains and appurtenances off from those mains not located in the ROW or deeded over to the City after formal approval. For this project, the water mains will be shown as being private. 20. It must be understood that this Department would only provide the service of overseeing the repair and maintenance of the water mains and appurtenances after we have inspected and approved the installation of the water main and service lines beyond the City owned locations. 21. The labor rate would be the same as approved in the Management Contract by the Champlain Water District and the City of South Burlington, revised annually. 22. The above referenced labor and material charges are in addition to any fee required under the South Burlington Water Department Ordinance, such as but not limited to private fire hydrants and sprinkler systems. At this time private fire hydrants are assessed a $100 per hydrant annual fee. 23. Gate valves and curb stops outside of the City ROW must have a Warranty Deed filed for the South Burlington Water Department to gain access for operation in emergencies and for disconnecting service to delinquent accounts provided that the City of South Burlington follows the requirements set forth in State Statute Title 24 V.S.A. Chapter129, Uniform Water and Sewer Disconnect. 24. No parallel underground utility shall be designed or installed within four feet (4') of the water main from either side, or above the water main from the bottom of the main to finish grade. The exceptions of storm sewer and sanitary sewer are only as allowed by the CWD Specifications and the VT Water Supply Rule. No building or structure shall be built above the water line or within the water line easement. Generally storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be designed to be installed with a five-foot (5') separation unless provisions have been included to allow for proper support of either the storm water or sewer structures or water lines in the event of a needed excavation of the water main. No utility shall be placed within five feet of any gate valve or ten feet of any fire hydrant. 25. Prior to any building construction, the building contractor must contact this Department to discuss City requirements for meter sizing, meter settings, and backflow protection. 26. The SBWD shall be notified in advance to inspect all mechanical joint fittings, main line taps, appurtenances, thrust blocks, water line crossings, and testing prior to occurrence or backfilling. 27. Upon completion of the construction project, "Record Drawings" shall be supplied to the appropriate CWD supervisor in the form of one (1) hard copy and one (1) electronic copy in Auto -CAD Version 2003 Format (.DWG) or newer. All Record Drawings are to include valve ties, and manufacturer make and casting date for all gate valves. Location ties for all curb stops, and water shut offs (WSO's) shall also be provided on the Record Drawings. On given projects CWD may require that submittals and/or O&M manuals be submitted in electronic Adobe Acrobat Reader (.pdf) format. 28. Final acceptance (after a warranty period determined by the municipality) shall not take place until the appropriate CWD supervisor has determined that the water system Record Drawings have been received and all required improvements have been satisfactorily completed. Water system Record Drawings shall be prepared and submitted to the appropriate CWD supervisor at the completion of the construction project. The appropriate CWD supervisor or his designee will conduct a walk-through inspection of the construction project and prepare a "punch -list" of identified deficiencies. The contractor shall repair, replace or retest promptly as directed by the CWD supervisor and without further charges to the water system owner, all work, equipment, materials or parts, which may fail during the warranty period. Prior to starting the project, and in the absence of statutory requirements the developer/contractor will enter into an agreement for the initial routine maintenance and warrantee of the work through final completion, acceptance and transfer of ownership. 29. Further review changes may be required as this project proceeds through the permit process. Future plans must include details and specifications as required in above. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please call me. Sincerely, Jay Nadeau Superintendent CC. Cathyann Larose Bruce Hoar Doug Brent George Dow Plan Reviews: Technology Park, Lot 2 9-07 PLANNNG DATA MATCH,LSIll OWNER: TECHNOLOGY PARK ASSOCIATES, INC ENERGY,INC. W IERMONT. INC. Technology AXI --�-- /, / / 30 COMMUNITY DRIVE South Bturlir�gt.., VT SOU7H SURLINGTONVT 05403 PHONE. (1102)WO-1691 TIM - - --------- (,QT..-8c ZONE MIXED INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL /Z Lot 2 LOT 2. 5-0 AC. BUILDINC SIZE: 54,459 SF PAI?KIN SPACE REQUIRED: Z,tl OWNER: (3.5 SPACES11000 SF) , (54,459 SF) - 191 SPACES Technology Park Pafte PARKING SPACES PROMENFUEL PROPOSED (INCLUDING 6 30 Community Drive Sul HANDICAPPED SPACES AND SPACES FOR EL EFFICIENT VENCLES) (5X . 191 SPACES) NO DISTUR South Burlington, VT 05 LOT CO%ERAGES, Phone: (802)860-1691 Fax: (802)860-1695 PROPOSED: SUILOWC, fa, IM W - 8.33X ALL PAIPROVEMENM 90,9 5 SF - 41.72K DESIGN BUILDER: FRONT YAM: 4225 SF- 16.32X . ..... . ... - ReArrh Company 30 Community Drive Sul NO South Burlington, VT 05 -LIGHTING PLAN - SEE PLAN BY SE GROUP LOT I -PLANTING PLAN - SEE PLAN By SE CROUP Phone:(802)863-8727 -CONNECTION DETAILS UPON APPLJCA77ON TO Fax: (802)863-8734 UTIU71ES ARCHITECT: -THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UlIU77ES ARE 940M IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY A_ 7. $2 Architecture ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY THE OMER OR W ENGINEER. ME 4_1 CON ?ACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE 15, 5224 Shelburne Rd. COMMENCING WORK, AND AGREES TO BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR AN AND ALL DAMAGES Shelburne, VT 05482 WHICH NIGHT Bf OCCASIONED By ME CONTRACTORS FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERW ANY AND ALL UNDERGROLND UTILIMS. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS W& //Z RESPONSIBILITY TO CONTACT *M SAFE' AT 1-800-225-4977 TO LOCATE ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES Phone:(802)985-5695 BEFORE EXCAVATION BEGINS THE CONTRACTOR IS TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEN UTILITIES AS SHOW AND AS FOUND. Fax (802)985-5565 -60.650 SF OF PARKING LOT _71 STRUCTURAL ENGINE 6,347 SF OF ISLANDS IN PARKING LOT N% Goldstein -Milano LLC 'A' 125 Main Street SCREENM -6 Reading, MA 01867 DUMPSITIR MTH NEEP Phone:(781)670-9990 Gr4phic Scale PO PAD Fax: (781)670-9939 VN' 8.8' CONCRETE I I !!%milinnommi Fed EM OF 30 0 30 60 90 t20 REFER TV I _7 CIVIL ENGINEER: CONCRETE DRAIiiING CONCRE PAD CURB Trudell Consulting Engir STAIRS irk Road CURB Williston, V. U5495 L1111'a 'A' /I Phone:(802)879-6331 LOT 6� Fax: (802)879-0060 e�EEA SUM STORAW_ aQ kLX AWA TYPF��__ 'y LANDSCAPE ARCHITE BE Group 41) OU A 131 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 GAIr V,% - — ------- Phone: (802)862-0096 IOUT-334.90 (TYPICAL) WOE CASEMENT FOR Fax: (802)865-2440 L ----------- I—x In BIKE PATH VEDIC HYDRAN It MECHANICAL ENGINEI glow_ PROPOSED 3 STORY 700' EASEMENT TO i - New England Air Systery VIVO!! P.O. Box 525 OFFICE BUDIHNG i 43 Krupp Drive 1� PE F.F.E. 343.0, Williston, VT 05495 CONTROL PNT. 8 ------ ��4 Nr 120 09" ALL Phorie,(802)864-3800 14 ; 11 . - , 175 p. 160, Fax: (802)BCA-3904 . -i � . I Pb. f0- 39 25' E_ASEEi TO ELECTRICAL ENGINEE MET & T. 13; DMCT DROP .1 p. 398 T Omega Electric B I + ------- CURB (nP.) - Ik 26 Omega Drive Williston, VT 05495 r COKWT — 2�& REFER iO ARCH. aa R.Phone:(802)862-0517 A I C FOR Fax: (802)862-4349 PLAZA DETAIL -SKINS FOR VAN SPACE 1 4 FIRE PROTECTION: n1i OF a SPACES 41 North Country Fire Prote REFER TO ARM Vnill VIPA AT I AVI P.O. Box 2004 — DRAWNG For Colchester, VT 05446 PATIO DETAIL & WE PATH SEE SHEETS Pt P2 & P3 Phone:(802)878-6594 rax; kw2)878-2186 FOR FUEL PAJ6014 f N T PROPOSED DATE: 09/07/2007 CCHCREIT qUT-P7-I SCALE: 1"=30 a ' 134a - 70 SEE F 8 r.32 REVISIONS /4 �4 INSIALUNG V - CA �33&5 7- No. Dote -------- SEP Fk.1 City Swbm� 1 AD 1-33&5 1 40, wX Uylun MOT 0 TV wig IS, Z�14w u A VALW "YAW Ti EXIST SAN. NH I NO. 7VI (GAP & MARK Ew) 34JL62 EXIST SAN. MH 2 It LN WNER Will To JMLSS > MAW 3". 06 IN &.339.6 .7;t4l J4,4(21 R 1 1 (AN 33& 72 ---------- - FW0AR7`LOT 3 1 , I � 01 a RAISE RIM S ------- EL -344,810 AW-340u) S-Nkt4fi "Rusi, r2O' WDE UT7L1 Di EASEMENT 110 --------- BLOCK OUT-M34 Ve2 IA E'1111 SPARE COMM IT FOR LOT 3 241' W FUTURE A Aw sp? GREEN ACRES I a N/F RIZUCALU PROPERTIES 1LC o' SEWER EASEMENT T To CITY OF so. eu6ur+croN r• �/ / ' 60' R.O.W. BURUNGTON PROPERTIES CITY OF SO.. BURIUNGION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 13 �� %i c ,%� •/ PROPOSED ROAD MOMW To jr 11I07H r y1 12 PARCEL B FENCE , j FENC[ LINE FURORE SUBOIMSION LINES / 'WHALE'S TAILS' SCULPTURE 10 ISO' IN RSTATE =p WAAr OWKAY OSTMCT FLOOD PLAIN LIMITS/ (ZONE -A', PARCEL 01500195 DO H) % (NO ELEVATIONS FRONDED) / JO' EASEMENT TO 10' VF. ELEC, CO-OP. TRCAM BUFFER IW' EASEMENT 70 _ GB. MT POWER C 20' EASEMENT \ RECREATION TO CITY OF NiLUSnNM LNP. INC.'"-: ++'W°'Y,. OSiTNBUTKXM, CTR PROPERnES LTD -^ AI t�'M- C & S. WASHBURN of N/F D. & L OBRIEN 20' SEWER EASEMENT TO CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON (FUTURE 8' WIDE TION RECREAPATIi 10' EASEMENT TO CHAMP-. WATER DISTRICT N/F -' - APPROX 100 YEAR WOODLAND COMMONS FL000 PLAIN IIMITS� COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUM 20 S[Y R F I F F i TO ( ry OF SU N RL NGTtM'- - PARCE - 8c A� / 15' EASEMENT TO 14 20' WIDE SEWER EASEMENT i`• ! i $'.i �••``., to CITY OF SO, BURL. 1' S) CITY EASEMENT SAARis r to, SGUM OF MN `• P CUSS J - POND � 8b a E. �yyJ/ ro arr `T S iING BIIILON O��\-��_ PROPOSED 10" EASEMENT PARKWG TO G.M.P. C. IQD' Sr17EAM BUFFER PROPOSED 20' SEWER EASEMENT TO CITY DELINEATED OF SO BURLINGTON WETLANDS f CLASS 2 N/F PARKVIEW AT TICONDEROGA i� DELINEATED EXISTING 20' WETLANDS EASEMENT FOR ED G.A55 2 CITY OF PART 70 CITY )S OF S0, BURL J 100' EASEMENT TO GG GM.P.C. NEF C. SNEPARD � I -i--^ ROPOSED �- 20' EASEMENT FOR BIKER TO CITY OF so. BURLINGTON N/F \ CiABLE HO.DCO EXCHANGE 10. UC E B FTER , Y EASEMENT TO 1 ' It INL�ltt,1 / 1 VT GAS SYSTEMS �i Wfn'NDS 30' X 30' SIGN EASEMENT DELINEATEDWETLANDS CLASS 3 /"' .. y I I 60. (lI f t L 100' EASEMENT Aoc.M.P.c. l f � 'PROPOSED DRANTACE EASEMENT N/F RUBY B. OBLIS FAMILY TRUST \••\ SIDEWALKENT N/F \, . EASEM / EMUND COMPANY \ • T� // % ,�. 01 TO N.Cr & I. �J/ ,_ / 'rLANO / /r\.�,, 3 t \ /2.' SEWER_. I NT - EASEMENT RrL h 60' ACCESS & \ UTILITY EASEMENT; FUTURE ROAD WIDENING TO A r 32 1170 H / Y —20' EASEMENT FOR TO GAY OF BLINGTINGTON / PROPOSED N/F RECREA77ON PAIH INVESTORS CORP. OF VA. ' WITIIN EASEMENT �20' WILE EASEMENT TO Or OF SO. BURL. CENTERED ON EXISTING WATER LINE XISn /-30' X 30' SIGN EASEMENT M.P.C. LD 00 Ae. GREENTREE i5 PARK 7URE WOE RECREATION PA ( �eGgPl, ORO, J N/F W.W. GRAINGER. INC CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON s �VED EP g ?00? City of So e�hin8t°n Graphrc Scale Feet 200 0 200 400 600 Roo Technology Par South Burlington, VT Lot 2—_-----_ _ OWNER: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)860-1691 Fax: (602)060-1695 DESIGN BUILDER: ReArch Company 30 Community Drive Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)863-8727 Fax: (802)863-8734 ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne, VT 05482 Phone:(802)985-5595 Fax: (802)985-5565 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC 125 Main Street Reading, MA 01867 Phone:(781)670-9990 Fax: (781)670-9939 CIVIL ENGINEER: Trudell Consulting Engineers 478 Blair Park Road P.O. Box 308 Williston, VT D5495 Phone:(802)879-6331 Fax: (802)B7"060 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: BE Group 131 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Phone:(802)862-0096 Fax: (802)865-2440 MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box 525 43 Krupp Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)864-3800 Fax: (802)864-3904 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Omega Electric 25 Omega Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)862-0517 Fax: (802)862-4349 FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protection P.O. Box 2004 Colchester, VT 05446 Phone:(802)878-6594 Fax: (802)878-2186 DATE: 09/07/2007 SCALE: 1 "=200' —_ REVISIONS No. Date j IFWd City Submiaeim 9-13-07 SIN THE LOTS ALONG COMMUNITY DRIVE MAY BE SUB..ECT TD 70' WIDE EASEMENTS FOR POWER, TELEPHONE AND GAS SAID EASEMENTS TO RUN ALONG AND AD AGENT TO COMMUNITY DRIVE. THIS PLAT IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING 1) A TOTAL STATION CONTROL TRAVERSE, EVIDENCE FOUND IN THE FIELD AND INFORMATION ABSTRACTED FROM THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON AND THE TOWN OF WILISTON LAND RECORDS 2) BEING PORTION OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO TECHNOLOGY PARK ASSOC.. INC. PAHF ENERGY, INC AND AXINN-VERMONT INC IN VOLUME 388 PAGE 117 AND SHOWN ON A PLAT ENTITLED ' PUT OF LAND OF THE DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION WHICH IS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 173 PAGE 28. J) BEARINGS ARE BASED ON MAGNETIC NORTH TAKEN ALONG A LEG OF THE TRAVERSE ON DECEMBER 7, 1994. 4) PLANS OF THE VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION OF SHUN PIKE ROAD, PROXCT SOUTH BURLINGTON M 5200 (10)S. A PORTION OF THIS LAND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER AND SOME PERMANENT RIGHTS ALONG SHUNPIKE ROAD WERE CONVEYED TO THE VAOT IN VOLUME 271 PAGES BO AND 85, AND FROM THEM TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON IN VOLUME 211 PAGE 3D4. 5) THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR KIMBALL AVENUE WAS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON IN VOLUME 120 PAGE 42a THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR COMMUNITY DRIVE WAS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON IN VOLUME 424 PAGE 691 8) THE TOWN BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN THE TOWN OF WIWSTON AND THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. AND THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THIS SUBDIVISION FOLLOWS THE CENTERUNE OF MUDDY BROOK. 7) THIS PROPERTY IS SUB..ECT TO A STORM WATER DRAINAGE SERVICE AGREEMENT WAIVER AND EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED IN VOLUME 507 PAGE 431. 11�� cy stair TAYOLOR * NO. IBB * Z INS 141.94 PPAVED ARKING AREA APPROXIMATE APPROACH CN Oi'� An / pApg�(JS/ % 'i SIT P. 425 \ ME EASTERLY EDGE OF THE AIRPORT APPROACH CONE 20' MOE SEWER EASEMENT TO CITY . 25 BURL. EXISTING BUILDING '-- %, -EASEMENT TO VT. GAS SYSTEMS J9] p. 56 PROPOSED REMAINING LAND 60' ACCESS d UTIUTY- OF PARCEL A EASEMENT 60.62 A. c \ PAVED PARKING 20' SEWER EASEMENT AREA EASEMENT FOR WATER UNIT ALONG EMSIING LINE TO CITY OF SO. BURL . 507 p. 425 \ v. 507 p. 425 EASEMENT TO VT GAS SYSTEMS v. 315 p. B4 EASEMENT ALONG EXISTING LINES FOR POWER AND �` TELL"ONE 20' SEWER EASEMENT TO CITY OF 50. BURL S07 p. 425 TOTAL AREA - PARCEL At + LOT 2 - 65.62 A. LEGEND O REeAR T TO OE SET ) PI IRPN PWE ( SET ) • Iftov PwE (Fours ) ■ CONCRE IE MONUMENT ( FOUND ) O CONCRETE MONUMENT ( TO BE SET) -OXATFO WONT W EvsTNG HATER LINE -X-X-X-X-X- aRE "a 4 ,nul POLE ES EXTSTNc SEWER LINE G EXISTING NABIRAL GAS UNE ELT- EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE CABLE EUP/T- EXIs11NG UNDERGROUND IELEPNOVE AND POWER CABLES J CABLE HOLDCO EXCHANGE IX LLC PROPOSED v. 761 p. 282 DRAINAGE ¢ EASEMENT map slide 175 S�. JO' X 30' SIGN EASEMENT do,R LOT 2 '6t7; Ir 100 Ac. e PROPOSED PROPOSED 40' Al 49� EASEMENT RUBY B. WILLIS FAMILY TRUST 100' EASEMENT y. 505 p. 242 ro O.MP.C. v. 674 p. 7J5 mop fide 175 EDLUND COMPANY v. 478 p. 662 mop did. 104 ¢ rC ROAD V&T. EASEMENT FOR BIKEPAM CITY OF S0. BURLINCTON 20' WOE EASEMENT TO CITY OF SO. BURL CENTERED ON EXISTING WATER LINE v. 507 p. 425 INVESTORS CORP. OF VT.TO .364 p. 635 P252 p. 126 IGN EASfcORY APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. ON THE ___ DAY OF 200_, SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS ____ DAY OF 200- BY _ CHAIRMAN OR CLERK SOUTH BURLINGTON. VT. CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Received for Record a.d. 200_ at o'clock minutes _ M and Recorded in Attest City Clerk Graphic Scale Feet 200 0 200 400 600 am r VACATION CI 2J 4700 14118 59.43 59.01 S5716- C2 10J100 ISZ26 16210 C3 9100,00, 971DO 15284 152.68 slow G 927.00 581176 578.07 0,3279 C5 47200 534.03 506.00 • C8 3612, 867.00 547.85 538.7B S3229 C7 644934 412.00 466.15 441.6E S83'00 C8 92'48 34 317.00 51149 459.16 N18'101 C19 491352 J77.00 32194 3KO6 S393 C20 0720'25 831% 108.72 106.64 N24.34 C21 072025 77100 99.0.5 98. 52434 C22 342637 377.00 226.QJ T2124 S11O0; C25 OOD805 377.00 160.11 80.04 S10'46: L2 S7J' 32'E 57.90 L4 SSJ3611 60.2fl L5 S69'10 1 BODO L23 S770452 EIL94 L30 5691010 8.1 ' L31 S891011 E 18.76' L31 sz3z3'49 w 1 SFa �8 FO C, ?�Oj f'*Jo evni n9to,7 Subdivision Plat , W,W,• 20071W 2 LOT SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL A TECHNOLOGY PARK 11.t W. JAO D Community Drive py 9/07/07 Sc. South Burlington, Vermont �Z TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) "d "o 173 0 RevIYO�u Descrlpelon wea ey 14 Bietr Pork Rwd BOX 306 WYILrfoR VemwM 05496 8794f391 LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING PROPOSED SEWER MAINS AND SERVICES S SEWER MANHOLE O • WATER MAINS AND SERVICES FLUSHING BASIN O • STORM DRAINAGE ----- 0 ----- — 0 — CLEANOUT D •CO. UNOERDRAIN ----- . ----- — u0 CATCH BASIN ❑ ■ ROOF DRAIN ----- R0 ----- x0 — LIQUID PROPANE OURET OR ENO SECRQN \ OR NATURAL GAS - c ----- c VALE DC N OVERHEAD PDMF -- - mn ---- --- av — CURB STOP ® 9 UNDERGROUND ----- uT ----- ---- V. TELEPHONE FIRE HYDRANT UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC - VP 01 — THRUST BLOCK CABLE TELEVISION — END CAP [ [ FIBER OPTICS UTILITY POLE .. TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS Iv Iv -- MTC OR TRANSFORMER ■ PROPERTY LINE TELEPHONE MANHOLE /, • LEASE LINE-' WETLAND LIMIT TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ❑ BUILDING LUMINAIREILIGHT SETBACKS IRON PIPE O O PAVED ROAD ICE CONTROL POINT A SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Drawing Index ,;AND INTERPRETATION OF THE DRA WINGS I. DRAMNCS PREPARED FOR SUBMITTAL ARE INTENDED FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNING. COORDINATION WITH OTHER DISCIPLINES, UTIUPES, AND TH APPROVING AUTHORITIES THEY ARE NOT INTENDED AS FINAL DRAWNGS OR CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS. 2. DRAWINGS PREPARED FOR CONSTRUCTION ARE INTENDED TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH Subdivision Plat CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, SPECIFICATIONS, OWNR TR /CONACTOR AGREEMENTS AND TO BE FULLY COORDINATED MTH OTHER DISCIPLINES. THEY ARE SPECIFIC TO THE PROJECT. IF ERRORS ARE DISCOVERED THEY ARE TO BE BROUGHT TO ME ATTENTION OF MODELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) BEFORE USING. BY USE OF THESE DRAWINGS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT, THE SP1 Overall Site Plan OWNER REPRESENTS MAT (HE/SHE) HAS RENEWED, APPROVED. AND ACCEPTED ME DRAWNGS THE ORAMNGS SHALL BE CONSIDERED "FINAL APPROVAL SUBMISSION" ONCE THEY RECEIVE STATE AND LOCAL APPROVAL. 3. AS INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE THESE DRAWINGS AND COPIES THEREOF FURNISHED BY ME Sp2 Site Plan ENGINEER ARE HIS PROPERTY CHANGES TO THE DRAWINGS MAY ONLY BE MADE BY THE ENGINEER. 4. IT IS THE USER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THIS COPY CONTAINS ME MOST CURRENT SP3 Site Plan REVISIONS. CONSTRUCTION NOTES: Pi Plan/Profile 1. CON TRACT DOCUMENTS: MESE PLANS WERE PREPARED BY TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (ICE) AND ARE INTENDED TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE STANDARD GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, OC-700 PREPARED BY ME ENGINEERS JOINT CONTRACT DOCUMENTS COMMITTEE (EJCDC). LATEST EDITION. COPIES ARE AVAILABLE AT WWWN5PEORG/EJCDC P'f L plan/Profile 2.UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS: ME LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED BASED ON RESEARCH,EVIDENCE AVAILABLE AND OBTAINEDANNER CONSISTENT MTH ORDINARY STANDARD OF PROFESSIONAL CAPEAANDOHAVERNOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIEDFACE MEME DESIGN ENGINEEN BYTHE OMER OR P3 Plan/Profile J.DIFFRING SUBSURFACE OR PHYSICAL CONDITIONS: IF CONTRACTOR BELIEVES MAT ANY SUBSURFACE OR PHYSICAL CONDITION AT OR CONTIGUOUS TO THE SITE MAT IS UNCOVERED OR REVEALED EIMER: (1) IS OF SUCH A NATURE AS TO ESTABLISH MAT ANY "TECHNICAL DATA" ON WHICH CONTRACTOR RELIED IS MATERIALLY INACCURATE, OR (2) IS OF SUCH A NATURE AS TO REQUIRE A CHANGEIN ME PLANS/ P4 Access Drive Profile CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. OR (3) DIFFERS MATERIALLY FROM MAT SHOWN OR WDICA70 IN ME PLANS/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: OR (4) IS OF AN UNUSUAL NATURE. AND DIFFERS MATERIALLY FROM CONDITIONS ORDINARILY ENCOUNTERED AND GENERALLY RECOGNIZED AS INHERENT IN WORK OF THE CHARACTER POVIDED FOR IN THETHEREOF AND BEFORERFURTHER DISTURBI GPMESSUBSURFACE OR PHCONTRACTEYSICALTIEN CONOIPONSAOR PERFORMING CTOR ANY WORK INSHALL PRPTLYRCONN BECOMING MERE., EPSC1 Erosion Control Plan (EXCEPT IN AN EMERGENCY), NOTIFY OWNER AND ENGINEER ABOUT SUCH CONDITION. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT FURTHER DISTURB SUCH CONDITION OR PERFORM ANY WORK IN CONNECTION MEREMM (EXCEPT AS AFORESAID) UNTIL RECEIPT OF WRITTEN ORDER TO DO SO. 4.UTIUDES: PRIVATE AND PUBLIC UTILITIES SUCH AS ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE GAS, CABLE. FIBER OPBC ETC. ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE EPSC2 Erosion Control Plan RESPEC 714E UTILITY COMPANY. ANY INFORMATION SHOWN BY TOE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY (USUALLY TO ASSIST WITH PERMITTING), FINAL DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES, COMPLIANCE MM EASEMENTS AND REGULATIONS (STATE AND LOCAL) ARE ME RESPONSIBILITY OF RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY, D1 Water Details 5.DIGSAFE IN ACCORDANCE MM VERMONT STATE LAW (VSA TITLE 30 CHAPTER 86 AND PSB RULE 3,500) ME CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO CONTACT DIGSAFE SYSTEMS, INC. "DIGSAFE" AT 1-888-344-7233 AT LEAST 48 HOURS , EXCLUDING SATURDAYS. SUNDAYS, AND LEGAL HOLIDAYS, BUT NOT MORE MAN 30 DAYS BEFORE COMMENCING EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES EXCEPT IN AN EMERGENCY. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PRE -MARKING ME SITE AND MAINTAINING DESIGNATED MARKINGS, FOR MORE INFORMATION ON D2 Sewer Details DIGSAFE REQUIREMENTS SEE WWW.DIGSAFE.CW. 6.JOBSITE SAFETY.. NEITHER ME PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES OF TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (ICE), NOR ME PRESENCE OF TCE OR ITS EMPLOYEES A SUB CONSULTANTS AT A CONSTRUCTION SITE SHALL RELIVE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ANY OTHER ENTITY OF THEIR D3 Storm Water Details OBUGAIIONS, DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO. CONSTRUCTION MEANS, MEM00S, SEQUENCE, TECHNIQUES OR PROCEDURES NECESSARY FOR PERFORMING, SUPERINTENDING OR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK OF CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WIM ME CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS REQUIRED BY ANY REGULATORY AGENCIES. ICE AND ITS PERSONNEL HAVE NO AUMORU`Y TO EXERCISE ANY CONTROL OVER ANY CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR OR OMER ENTITY OR THEIR EMPLOYEES IN D4 Miscellaneous Details a CONNECTION WINTHEIR WORK OR ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS. THE CLIENT AGREES MAT ME GENERAL CONTRACTOR 15 SOLELY Q7 RESPONSIBLE FOR JDBSLE SAFETY, AND WARRANTS THAT MIS INTENT SHALL BE MADE EVIDENT IN ME CLIENT'S AGREEMENT MM ME GENERAL CONTRACTOR. THE CLIENT ALSO AGREES MAT ME CLIENT, TCE AND TCES CONSULTANTS SHALL BE INDEMNIFIED AND SHALL BE MADE ADDITIONAL INSURED UNDER ME GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S GENERAL AL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY.�+ D5 Miscellaneous Details ] CODES AND STANDARDS COMPLIANCE: TCE SHALL EXERCISE USUAL AND CUSTOMARY PROFESSIONAL CARE IN ITS EFFORTS TO COMPLY MTH (� CODES. STANDARDS, REGULAPONS, AND ORDINANCES IN EFFECT. ME OWNER ACKNOWLEDGE MAT SUCH REQUIREMENTS MAY BE SUBJECT TO VARIOUS AND CONTRAOCTGRY INTERPRETATIONS. TCE, THEREFORE, MLL MAKE REASONABLE PROFESSIONAL EFFORTS AND JUDGMENT TO INTERPRET APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS D6 Erosion Control w AS MEY APPLY TO THE PROJECT. TCE, HOWEVER, CANNOT AND DES NOT WARRANT OR GUARANTEE MAT THE PROJECT MLL COMPLY MTH ALL INTERPRETATIONS OF SUCH REQUIREMENTS. %+ ,QT S.CONSMUCDON OBSERVATION: TCE MAY VISIT ME PROJECT AT APPROPRIATE INTERVALS DURING CONSTRUCTION TO BECOME GENERALLY FAMILIAR D/ Erosion Control MM ME PROGRESS AND QUALITY OF THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK AND TO DETERMINE IF THE WORK IS PROCEEDING IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE MM ME CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. ME OMIER HAS NOT RETAINED TCE TO MAKE DETAILED INSPECTIONS OR TO PROVIDE EXHAUSTIVE OR CONTINUOUS PROJECFOR,T REWEW AND OBSRVARON SERVICES. TCE DES NOT GUARANTEE ME PERFORMANCE OF, AND SHALL NOT HAVE RESPONSMATERIALIBILITYS ACTS OR ONS SUPPLIER OR ANY OMER ENTITYE RNISHING ANY OICEASHAL L1.0 Planting OR PERFORMING ANY WORK ONE THEOPROJECT.NOT SUPERVISE DIRECT OR HAW CONTROL OVER THMACTOR, CONTRACTOR'S Plan WORK NOR HAVE ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ME CONSTRUCTION MEANS, MEMODS TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES OR PROCEDURES OF THE CONTRACTOR. IF ME OWNER DESIRES MORE EXTENSIVE PROJECT OBSERVATION OR FULL -RUE PROJECT REPRESENTATION, ME OYMR SHALL REQUEST SUCH SERVICES BE PROVIDED BY TCE AS AODITIONAL SERVICES. L1.1 Planting Plan L1.2 Landscape Details L2.0 Lighting Plan L2.1 Lighting Plan A2.1 Building Floor Plan A4.1 Building Elevations E I x SITE sla. A i ,,l a i1711LK sax � / a.r IIEN HYP•• WA YW94ApIlET78 8c I _ P1 I e COMCAST WAY 13 I 1 P2 z I- 14 ECt SP2 EPsc I I '``' Y ` _' 12 8a r--I SHUNPIKE ROAD 6 1 1 3 1 I I d I 11 EMUI I u 4 P3 I I CJLEGORY DRIVE 10 8b 7 5 SHEET INDEX TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) TFRY RATS AxE S IrAIKx L ilR. RRPO.II M CONCEPTUAL PLANS PRELIMINARY PLANS ACT Z50 SUBMISSION FINAL CITY SUBMISSION CONSTRUCTION DRAW04GS IVOt! ILmJG TITS RAMS x1Sl�C THAT YOU xAvc T78 uTTnT RLV610N LAST REVISED 09/13/07 TCE PROJECT NO: 2007100 Graphic Sub Feet 400 0 400 Soo aw 1600 x Iv)ca.L x.va.auvFl Owner/Applicant- TECHNOLOGY PARK PARTNERS 30 COMMUNITY DRIVE SUITE 4 SOUTH BURLINGTON. VT 05403 PHONEY (802*60-16% FAX (802)860.1695 Destn Builder: REARCH COMPANY 30 COMMUNITY DRIVE SUITE 8 SOUTH BURLINGTON. VT 05403 PHONE (802)985.5595 FAX (802)985-&M5 Architect: S2 ARCHITECTURE 5224 SHUBURNE RD. SHELBUML VT 05482 PHONE (802)985-5595 FAX (802085-5565 Structural Engineer: GOLDSTEIN-MILANO LLC 125 MAIN STREET READING MA 01867 PHONE: (781)670-9990 FA)L (781)670-9939 Civil Engineer•• TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) P.O. BOX 308, 478 BLAIR PARK ROAD WI.LISTON, VT 08495 PHONE: (802)879.6331 FA-k (802)679.0060 Landscape Architect: SE GROUP 131 CHUCH STREET BUMINGTON, NET Owl PHONE, (802)862.0096 FAX, (802)86S"2440 Mechanical Engineer: New England Air Systems Inc. P.O. Box US 43 Knipp Drive WM$WM VT 05495 Pho (802UW4-3800 Fax: (802)864-3904 Fire Protection: North Country Fire Protection P.O. Box 2004 Colchester. VT 054" Phone: (802)878-6594 Fax: (802)878-2186 S,\TCE ➢RAVINGS\200J\100\200]100-01 WB 9/17/2007 4-37 PM EDT =p ' \ 1T3CHNOLOOY PARK -LOT g2 PLANT LIST ROTANICAI. NAME COMMON NAME. OTY- SIR RFMARKC R NORTHERN:' \ 34VJ OI OyyErg TREES •\ 4 •• AC Amelenchier canadensis Servixberry IS 6-8' B&a. Single Stem AF Accr fmtmnn i'Aummn bled R-111-1 Maple 10 1 12.7"Gill H&B. 6 Brancbing Ht (M I \ �\ ti'•--_ ` , AR Accr mbmm'Red sunset' Red Maple 20 1 12 - J" Cel. B&B, 6 Branching HL (M O ._ \ 3-IW \ \ \\ \ �\ V OT Glednsia triw=thas Sh de Meeter Honeylncuat 12 2 12. J" Lid. B&B, 6 Branching H. (M MS Malua urgrnw SergentCmbepple 77 2-212'Cal. B&B. Full _-._—ze< `•, �i - _ PC Pyme cdleryam Cbentrcleei Chamidner Prnr 8 21.2-3"Col.. B&B, Full PO Picea glauca white Spmce 36 5-6" B&B, Full -- ---'- ------ --._..—._--. Cal. � P nercua pdualna Pin� Mkt �'n 60 2 1 2 - 3'B&B, b Dsmnch ng Ht R Sy nga rcliadata Jep.— Tree Lilac 19 8 - 10, B&B, 5 Bmnchmg Ht. (M 33-FR I •;� 3FFt �� —�— — �OP GROUND COVERS BItJH +' PT Pachysandre tertninulis Yechysmalro 977 Dare Ront B" o.a. TrsangWated -- .ate aliRnea — \ t Do . d 70 30-16" B&B, PIan160" nx. 11\ n i v CR Comm me ) \ \ \ \ I ) CS Comua serf sane Redoeru gwood 237 IS-24' B&B, Plan 76" a.a I I I IV Ilex vemculata'Wmter Red' Wmterbeny 55 I1-14 B&B. PIsn160"oc IV) Bexvenin,hte'lrm Dandy' Wiulerbetry 16 IS-24" D&D, PIan160"o.e. Z '1 \ ll JH JRmpema hmizonlahs'Ber llarbot Bar Harbor Jumper 322 IS-24" 30"o.e Tnangulekd '.� \ I TC texas cusp, Tuna Japanese Yew I t8 24-70" D&B, Plmt 30' o.c I -, I . ` \� I SP Spirnee japonca Shirobana Shitnbena Spire. 19 1844" 30' o c Tnengulated 1 �ByI 1$s \ ' PPRF'NNIAI 3 CB Cimmif.8—implex Bugbane 239 10.1. Plant24"o.e. \ CL chelooe lyon,i Pink mniehead 400 1 Gel. Pleat 18" o e. CP Cehhe pduabis Mush Mangold 211 1 Gal. Plant 24" o.c. FR Fihpendula mbm Venusro' Msdowswee 306 GeI. Plant 24"oc. `.-2 IR Iris vcnicnlor - Blue FIa81na 149 1 Gal. Plem 24" u.c. 2 \ RF Rudbakia fulgide Black eyed S.— 439 1 CO. PI_ 15" o.c. P I I SEEDING "L.D. Oliver Nonhem Region Wildflower Mu' by Oliver Seed, Apply 121b.13000 a.E 2.000 s.f. t I �ae eaaaeae..." tilIIIIIIII!ij �♦ '� IN �..t8:ti.►.I�Allt�tiV�AB\`fai.►�Inl_IV.�{i +� — — 11C _ � � � : e T5 7r ^Ao -ms� �r w�. —air "'"� =wI--•w.;p �... �� ,ICI h ' ��w�� • ` t N I1 oe to 6Pd0. I o.?of'9's��\�� r• ij�l 1�1 � lei"gfj • �. „ \��,��ip 'r� p . I`. � ,�� .ail---- rr�c••'-.trl !-d'ty� Iiy, a°o oon �'�oo��l); ON 'Fill 0 Irr4,Q►-.O ins � _.-"'M. �.r�► � 1 n - .. - _..... 2-=N-._ Y-AG 3-PG .____. 3.AR I Technolo PaY b South Burlington, VT � Lot #2 OWNER: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)860-1691 Fax: (802)860-1695 DESIGN BUILDER: ReAmh Company 30 Community Drive Suite 8 South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)863.8727 Fax: (802)863-8734 ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne, VT 05482 Phone:(802)985-5595 Fax: (802)985-5565 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: Goldstein -Milano LLC 125 Main Street Reading, MA 01867 Phone:(781)670-9990 Fax: (781)670-9939 CIVIL ENGINEER: �•, i Tn dell Counsulting Englneel / 478 01aIr Park Road f P.O. Box 308 / Williston, VT05495 Phone:(802)879-6331 1 Fax: (802)879-0060 \ LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: SE Group 131 Church Street Burlington, VT 05401 Phone:(602)862-0098 Fax: (802)865-2440 MECHANICAL ENGINEER: New England Air Systems in P.O. Box 525 43 Krupp Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)864-3800 Fax: (802)864-3904 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: Omega Electric 25 Omega Drive Williston, VT 05495 Phone:(802)862-0517 Fax: (802)862.4349 FIRE PROTECTION: North Country Fire Protectio P.O. Box 2004 Colchester, VT 05446 -,{ Phone:(802)878.6594 Fax: (802)878-2186 I. DATE: 08/24/2007 REMSIONS INo. Date 0 15 30' Planting r= L 1 a. 0 South Burlington Fire Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 846-4110 Douglas S. Brent, Fire Chief September 28, 2007 Ms. Juli Beth Hines, Director of Planning and Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Technology Park Lot 2 Dear Juli: I have reviewed the plans for the proposed construction of the proposed commercial office building on Lot 2 at Community Drive. I have also spoken with the folks from Trudell Consulting about the project. It looks like an excellent project and I have the following recommendations: 1. Compliance with all requirements of Vermont Division of Fire Safety codes and standards. 2. Automatic sprinklers and alarm system as required by Vermont Division of Safety. 3. Fire Department Sprinkler Connection location to be specified by SBFD. 4. Fire Alarm panel and enunciator location to be specified by SBFD. 5. Provide 24 hour per day off -site (central station) monitoring of all fire alarm and protection systems. 6. Provide an emergency key box (or boxes), location to be specified by SBFD. 7. Elevator car(s) to be sized large enough to accommodate an ambulance stretcher in the flat position. 8. In a previous meeting with the developer it was agreed that 2 hydrants would be provided. 9. Trees, fences and floral outcroppings should be placed so as not to interfere with the deployment of the aerial ladder, hoselines, portable ladders and other firefighting equipment. 10. The access road on the West side of the building should be widened to allow set-up and use of the aerial ladder truck. This will require a minimum of 20ft. in width. Page - 2 At this point these seem to be the major issues which present themselves. As this project moves forward additional items may surface which can be dealt with as needed with the assistance of the developer and the Vermont Division of Fire. Should you need any further assistance on this project please feel free to contact me. Sine y, ou las S. Brent g Fire Chief -R_=Cti PP RK ixT c-A s RE PLAN PREW M I N &P-y -M! D FI N A-L_ Permit Number SP- 0 ( - CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. l) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #jT:WW()L-0CTy PAf-V- TtA: aco- 1100h PA: 81ofj - I I0115 — 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) 'aQDK 31258 . PPJ 6[F t7F 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) PW b(P0- l tab Fx' 8(00-10F 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): %: 125t-- V ", FYI "- 0660 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 50 CgUkLUMJTy 'J>fZkVF—, SO. P�U (ZL4 KCt--MyJ \rF V5!}03 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) Uk2Ao-- CbpCj3 a 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) CAic)I Sir. o1E F1 cz LActyy-T "mu EAca )N Nfx 1 w EUs-n NEB- ftl LO) I�- b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain)155iLkS.F. CFE=1CT-- SMtV, IM MRW 11�UIL.I 1N(;z- ON LUT a.. EJ USES W "- -1 N 7A--O, - D S.9. 9U1 LO 1 Kft -M RF--k/1 A-1K1 c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing TD� TAL (EY-M I N 6t &N o tMDPME ldings to remain) d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specif if basement and mezzanine) 5b' tytm. REIC-C� W 11+k 3 STDQZS PROPS �� EYA STt- I ! `TM 1 6u 1 " I N CT -i-D REMA-1 N . e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): Mt--W EM PLOyeES g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): N A- 8) LOT COVERAGE- Total Parcel Size: (C5•+0ONC- bl I &3R S.F. a) Building: Existing -% / Proposed % / sq. ft. sq. ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing % / sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing _% / sq. ft. Proposed % sq. ft. PLU&—C-,F SEE AT�� C) Si�Uffl FbR L-C)T CjbvERK-rES. �N d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.)3�-' J bS },* = gj •�AC. (Aff-EEC 1 * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ 4. s mww oI j b) Landscaping: $ *,�B'3 J I I b c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): $ b-313j aq (Srm I"PADVEMEj�TS� 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out):( LxT o'Z) b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): FyCIS 1 N (� - N Lb`C J c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): "T a- 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: b i k.NA. -M 5 P.M 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: MONDIAL( —f�WOV(;dj F:F\OAy 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: aD()q 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). f, I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: / REVIEW AUTHORITY: IJ Development Review Board ❑ Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: rl Complete '12 ❑ LL -100 Planning & Zoning or Designee hate a Green Mountain Power Corporation W. W. Grainger, Inc. 163 Acorn Lane 100 Grainger Parkway Colchester, VT 05446 Lake Forest, IL. 60045 Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 50 Joy Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Chelsea Communications 106 Kimball Avenue So. Burlington, VT 05403 Edlund Company, Inc. 159 Industrial Parkway Burlington, VT 05401 Birnn Holdings, LLC 102 Kimball Avenue, Unit 4 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Catamount/Woodlands, LLC 210 College Street, Suite 201 Burlington, VT 05401 Lawrence Press 102 Kimball Avenue, Suite 318 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Williston Distribution Center 75 Boyer Circle Williston, VT 05495 Riggs Properties Route 2 Box 4661 Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 Burlington Properties, LTD P. O. Box 9210 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Ruby B. Willis Family Trust c/o 120 Kimball Avenue, LLC 159 Industrial Parkway Burlington, VT 05401 I.C.V. 30 Main Street #401 Burlington, VT 05401 Green Acres, Inc. P. O. Box 2123 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Richard T. Willis Trust B c/o 120 Kimball Avenue, LLC 159 Industrial Parkway Burlington, VT 05401 O'Brien Family Limited Partnership 102 Kimball Avenue Unit 2, LLP P.O. Box 2184 102 Kimball Avenue, Unit 2 So. Burlington, VT 05403 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Jean Poulin 1237 Flora Vista Street Trinity FL 34655 Alan Levi 310 Hanon Drive Williston, VT 05495 Chadwick M. Shepard 102 Aspen Lane Williston, VT 05495 LNP, Inc. 300 Cornerstone Drive, Suite 130 Williston, VT 05495 Grandchildren Realty, Inc. 343 Pecks Road Pittsfield, MA 01201 Warren and Mary Lahue 3097 Williston Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Forest Park Realty P.O. Box 2184 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Washburn, Christopher and Suzanne 204 Boyer Circle Williston, VT 05495 TECHNOLOGY PARK LOT COVERAGES PERCENTAGE S.F. EXISTING PARCEL A LOT SIZE = 65.62 AC. BUILDING EXISTING 9.54% 272,711 PROPOSED 0 0 OVERALL EXISTING 25.46% 726,759 PROPOSED 0 0 FRONT YARD EXISTING 19.15% 29,193 PROPOSED 0 0 PROPOSED LOT 2 LOT SIZE = 5.0 AC. BUILDING EXISTING 0 0 PROPOSED 8.33% 18,153 OVERALL EXISTING 0 0 PROPOSED 42.03% 91,611 FRONT YARD EXISTING 0 0 PROPOSED 16.32% 4,225 PROPOSED LOT Al LOT SIZE = 60.62 AC. (REMAINDER) BUILDING EXISTING 10.32% 272,711 PROPOSED 0 0 OVERALL EXISTING 27.56% 726,759 PROPOSED 0 0 FRONT YARD EXISTING 19.15% 29,193 PROPOSED 0 0 September 10, 2007 Cathyann LaRose and Ray Belair So. Burlington Planning and Zoning Office 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Technology Park PUD Application Dear Cathyann and Ray: TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) tel: 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudeliconsulting.com Please find the attached applications for preliminary and final for the future Lot 2 at Technology Park. We would like to request that Lot 2 be created as part of the PUD for Parcel A, since the subdivision may not be approved prior to this PUD. The following information is provided to address the sketch plan comments dated September 4, 2007. We are requesting a hearing date of October 2, 2007. 1. The dimensional information shown reflects the Lot 2 area that will be created as part of this PUD. The lot coverage calculations included with the application include calculations for Parcel A and Lot 2. 2. Please see response #1 . 3. Comments not yet received. 4. This building will connect to the public sewer system as shown on the plans. 5. Comments not yet received. 6. Trudell Consulting Engineers will meet with Tom DiPietro to discuss his memo. 7. The project will adhere to South Burlington Land Development Regulations regarding erosion control. 8. The site plan has been revised to reduce the encroachment in the wetland buffer. The dumpster has been relocated out of the wetland buffer and the entire parking area has been shifted east to avoid as much of the buffer as possible. Drainage patterns have also been changed to minimize direct runoff to wetlands from impervious surfaces. 9. We have met with the Fire Chief already and added an additional hydrant per his request. 10. New utility lines will be located underground. 11. The landscape plan continues to be revised to improve screening from Kimball Ave. See #19. P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Civil Engineering, Surveying, Land Planning, Water and Wastewater, Landscape Architecture. Roadway Design, Permitting Y TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) tel: 802-879-6331 12. The berming will not take place within the right-of-way, however, some grading may oQ ECdiA0d-tW60 the bike path construction. www.trudellconsulting.com 13. The berms are located outside of the right of way. The berm heights vary from 4'to 8'in height. 14. The construction costs are included on the application form. 15. The calculations for the landscaping in the interior of the proposed parking area are included with this application. The 10% minimum is provided. 16. The bicycle rack has been labeled and is located near the entrance of the building. 17. No comment listed. 18. The DRB decided parking in the front was acceptable at the time of the Sketch Hearing. Parking will be located at the front of the building and additional screening measures will be added based on the DRB's comments. 19. Berms will be used to provide screening of the parking areas and the final details of landscaping and berms will be worked out with staff prior to the hearing. 20. N/A. 21. The dumpster has been relocated outside of the wetland buffer. 22. Building mounted light cut sheets are included with this submittal. 23. A letter is attached. 24. Please see updated plans. Sincerely, cz:* Jennifer A. Desautels, P.E. cc: John Illick Tim McKenzie Steve Schenker Mark Hall P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Civil Engineering, Surveying, Land Planning, Water and Wastewater, Landscape Architecture. Roadway Design, Permitting Y TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) September 7, 2007 Cathyann LaRose and Ray Belair So. Burlington Planning and Zoning Office 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 RE: Technology Park Lot 2 (Parcel A) Sewage Pumping Station To Whom It May Concern: tel: 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudeliconsulting.com The proposed sewage pumping station will meet with City of South Burlington's pump station design criteria. Please contact me with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. Jennifer A. Desautels, P.E. cc: Tim McKenzie P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Civil Engineering, Surveying, Land Planning, Water and Wastewater, Landscape Architecture. Roadway Design, Permitting ceramic metal halide photometric Report Report No.: Pouuen Report No.: Luminaire: Lamp: Emciency: Description: 45 41 105 93 90 CoNrklarrta O Utlltratlon -Zonal Cavity Method NYW4AAx-1-70 W-CMH-TS.IES L4520 NY W-MAX-i-70 W-CMH-T6.IES Nyhsm Maxi Wall, White 1/70W/CMH1T6/G12 54.3% All data sham are per 1000 lumens This report can be used for ukulation on all versions use only aMal lumen data when calculating 030 121 12.1 22.2 .0 199 19.9 36.7 060 364 9BA 87.0 0-90 516 61.8 95.1 90-120 17 1.7 3A 90-130 21 2.1 3.8 WI so 25 2.5 4.6 90-180 27 2.7 4.9 Room Cavity Ratio 0 64 64 64 64 62 62 62 62 59 59 59 56 56 56 53 53 53 52 1 58 55 52 50 56 53 51 49 50 46 47 48 46 47 47 44 43 42 2 52 47 43 39 50 46 42 39 43 40 37 41 38 36 39 37 35 34 3 47 41 36 32 45 40 35 32 36 34 31 38 32 30 34 31 29 28 4 43 36 31 27 41 35 30 26 33 29 26 31 26 25 30 27 24 23 5 39 32 27 23 35 31 26 23 29 26 22 25 24 22 27 24 21 20 6 36 26 23 20 35 28 23 20 27 22 19 25 22 19 2 21 16 17 7 33 26 21 17 32 25 20 17 24 20 17 23 19 16 22 19 16 16 6 31 23 19 1630 23 16 /5 22 18 1S 21 17 1S 20 171 13 9 29 21 17 14 26 21 17 14 20 16 13 /9 16 13 19 15 13 12 Design Alfred Homann Concept Nyhavn Maxi Wall creates general illumination, mainly directed downward by the conical shade. The rings ensure that stray light is controlled, and direct a small amount of light onto the top side of the shade for self -illumination. Finish Copper, brushed. White or natural painted aluminum, powder coated. Material Shades: Spun aluminum or spun copper. Endosure: Injection molded clear polycarbonate, injection molded partly frosted polycarbonate or injection molded white opal polycarbonate. Rings: Die cast aluminum or copper plated, die cast red brass. Top: Die cast aluminum or copper plated, die cast red brass. Mounting plate: Die cast aluminum or copper plated, die cast red brass. Arm: Extruded aluminum or copper plated, extruded red brass. Mounting Surface: Mounted directly to a recessed ballast box (10.7" diameter x 3.6" D) provided or mounted directly to finished surface over a recessed 4" octagonal junction box. Weight Max. 49 lbs. Label cUL, Wet location. IBEW. Product code Light source Voltage Finish NYW-MAX 1/70W/CMH/T-6 G12 120/208/240/277V COP 1/10OW/MH/ED-17 medium 120-277V NAT PAINT ALU 1/26W/32W/42W/CF GX24q-3/4 WHT Specification notes: Info notes: a. CMH variants provided with a partly frosted enclosure. I. All enclosures are U.V. stabilized polycarbonate. It. CF variants provided with an opal enclosure. II. The comparable EU version has the following classification: Ingress Protection Code: IP44. c. MH variants provided with clear enclosures. d. CMH variants provided with a recessed ballast box containing one 120-277V electronic ballast. e. CF variants provided with an universal wattage socket and 120-277V integral electronic ballast. I. MH variants provided with a recessed ballast box containing one 120/208/240/277V open core and coil ballast. (outs Louis Poulsen Lighting, Inc., 3260 Meridian Parkway, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33331 Telephone: (954) 349-2525 Fax: (954) 349-2550 poulsen www.louispoulsen.com Design: Alfred Homann Type: Project: Catalog Number: 10 D ceramic metal halide DIE CAST ALUMINUM I.C. RATED RECESSED BALLAST BOX (SUPPLIED) WALL CUTOUT = 10 5/8" DIA. ELECTRONIC BALLAST FOR 120V - 277V OPERATION DIE CAST ALUMINUM MOUNTING PLATE WITH WHITE OR NATURAL PAINTED ALUMINUM POWDER COATED FINISH (WEATHER RESISTANT)OR DIE CAST RED BRASS, COPPER PLATED EXTRUDED ALUMINUM SUPPORT ARM WITH WHITE OR NATURAL PAINTED ALUMINUM POWDER COATED FINISH (WEATHER RESISTANT)OR EXTRUDED RED BRASS, COPPER PLATED DIE CAST ALUMINUM TOP WITH WHITE OR NATURAL PAINTED ALUMINUM POWDER COATED FINISH (WEATHER RESISTANT), OR DIE CAST RED BRASS, COPPER PLATED SPUN AND ANODIZED ALUMINUM SOCKET COVER FOR PAINTED AND COPPER FOR COPPER VERSION (2) DIE CAST ALUMINUM ANNULAR RINGS WITH WHITE OR NATURAL PAINTED ALUMINUM POWDER COATED FINISH (WEATHER RESISTANT) OR DIE CAST RED BRASS, COPPER PLATED LAMPHOLDER: G12 MAXIMUM LAMP: 1 f70 W/CMHrr-&(M-139) CERAMIC METAL HALIDE (BY OTHERS) INJECTION MOLDED PARTLY FROSTED U.V. STABILIZED POLYCARBONATE LAMP ENCLOSURE (REMOVABLE FOR RELAMPING) SPUN ALUMINUM REFLECTOR SHADE WITH WHITE OR NATURAL PAINTED ALUMINUM POWDER COATED FINISH (WEATHER RESISTANT)OR HEAVY GAUGE UNTREATED BRUSHED COPPER louis Louis Poulsen Lighting, Inc., 3260 Meridian Parkway, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33331 Telephone: (954) 349-2525 Fax: (954) 349-2550 poutsen www.louispoulsen.com 1 Green Mountain Power Corporation W. W. Grainger, Inc. 163 Acorn Lane 100 Grainger Parkway Colchester, VT 05446 Lake Forest, IL. 60045 Pizzagalli Properties, LLC 50 Joy Drive So. Burlington, VT 05403 Chelsea Communications 106 Kimball Avenue So. Burlington, VT 05403 Edlund Company, Inc. 159 Industrial Parkway Burlington, VT 05401 Birnn Holdings, LLC 102 Kimball Avenue, Unit 4 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Catamount/Woodlands, LLC 210 College Street, Suite 201 Burlington, VT 05401 Lawrence Press 102 Kimball Avenue, Suite 318 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Williston Distribution Center 75 Boyer Circle Williston, VT 05495 Riggs Properties Route 2 Box 4661 Enosburg Falls, VT 05450 Burlington Properties, LTD P. O. Box 9210 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Ruby B. Willis Family Trust c/o 120 Kimball Avenue, LLC 159 Industrial Parkway Burlington, VT 05401 I.C.V. 30 Main Street #401 Burlington, VT 05401 Green Acres, Inc. P. O. Box 2123 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Richard T. Willis Trust B c/o 120 Kimball Avenue, LLC 159 Industrial Parkway Burlington, VT 05401 O'Brien Family Limited Partnership 102 Kimball Avenue Unit 2, LLP P.O. Box 2184 102 Kimball Avenue, Unit 2 So. Burlington, VT 05403 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Jean Poulin 1237 Flora Vista Street Trinity FL 34655 Alan Levi 310 Hanon Drive Williston, VT 05495 Chadwick M. Shepard 102 Aspen Lane Williston, VT 05495 LNP, Inc. 300 Cornerstone Drive, Suite 130 Williston, VT 05495 Grandchildren Realty, Inc. 343 Pecks Road Pittsfield, MA 01201 Warren and Mary Lahue 3097 Williston Road So. Burlington, VT 05403 Forest Park Realty P.O. Box 2184 So. Burlington, VT 05403 Washburn, Christopher and Suzanne 204 Boyer Circle Williston, VT 05495 Technology Park Lot 2 PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS % OF TOTAL AREA (SF) AREA (AC) IMPERVIOUS BUILDING 18,153 0.42 8.33% PVMT, WALKS & GREEN AREAS 1,438 0.03 0.66% GREEN AREA -225 -0.01 -0.10% PVMT, WALKS & GREEN AREAS 76,364 1.75 35.04% GREEN AREA -161 0.00 -0.07% GREEN AREA -4,151 -0.10 -1.90% GREEN AREA -87 0.00 -0.04% GREEN AREA -230 -0.01 -0.11% GREEN AREA -230 -0.01 -0.11% CONCRETE PAD 64 0.00 0.03% TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 90,935 2.09 41.72% FRONT YARD BIKE PATH 4,225 0.10 16.32% TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 4,225 0.10 16.32% AREA (SF) AREA (AC) % IMPERVIOUS LOT SIZE 217,947 5.00 41.80% FRONT YARD LOT SIZE 25,886 0.59 16.32% PROPOSED LOT COVERAGES BUILDING 18,153 0.42 8.33% ALL IMPROVMENTS 90,935 2.09 41.72% FRONT YARD 4,225 0.10 16.32% S:I_TCE DRAWINGS12000120000481Lot 21_Aug 2007 Redesign Umpervious Area Calcs (Lot 2).x1s Technology Park Parcel A EXISTING IMPERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS % TOTAL AREA (SF) AREA (AC) IMPERVIOUS BUILDING 271.051 6.22 9.47% BUILDING 1,602 0.04 0.06% BUILDING 60 0.00 0.00% PVMT, WALKS & GREEN AREAS 112,875 2.59 3.94% GREEN AREA -3,398 -0.08 -0.12% GREEN AREA -3,579 -0.08 -0.139/6 GREEN AREA -3,579 -0.08 -0.139/6 GREEN AREA -3.535 -0.08 -0.12% PVMT, WALKS & GREEN AREAS 342,559 7.86 11.97% GREEN AREA .3.152 -0.07 -0.11 % GREEN AREA -1,350 -0.03 -0.05% GREEN AREA -2,613 -0.06 -0.09% GREEN AREA -3.899 -0.09 -0.14% GREEN AREA -4,758 -0.11 -0.17% GREEN AREA -6,471 -0.15 -0.23% GREEN AREA -6,921 -0.16 -0.24% GREEN AREA -6,670 -0.15 -0.239/6 GREEN AREA -3,333 -0.08 -0.12% GREEN AREA -541 -0.01 -0.02% MISC 233 0.01 0.01% MISC 480 0.01 0.02% MISC 93 0.00 0.00% TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 675,157 15.50 23.59% FRONT YARD PVMT 5,575 0.13 1.63% PVMT 2,244 0.05 0.66% PVMT 1,300 0.03 0.38% PVMT 1,329 0.03 0.39% PVMT 18,038 0.41 5.27% TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 28,487 0.65 8.32% AREA (SF) AREA (AC) % IMPERVIOUS LOT SIZE 2,861,839 65.70 23.59% FRONT YARD LOT SIZE 342,253 7.86 8.32% EXISTING LOT COVERAGES BUILDING 289,204 6.64 10.11% ALL IMPROVMENTS 675,157 15.50 23.59% FRONT YARD 28,487 0.65 8.32% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS % TOTAL AREA (SF) AREA (AC) IMPERVIOUS BUILDING 18,153 0.42 0.639/6 PVMT, WALKS & GREEN AREAS 1,438 0.03 0.05% GREEN AREA -225 -0.01 -0.01% PVMT, WALKS & GREEN AREAS 112,875 2.59 3.94% GREEN AREA -230 -0.01 -0.01% GREEN AREA -87 0.00 0.00% GREEN AREA -230 -0.01 -0.01% GREEN AREA -4,258 -0.10 -0.15% GREEN AREA -230 -0.01 -0.01% MISC 64 0.00 0.00% TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 802,426 18.42 28.04% FRONT YARD PVMT 11,374 0.26 3.19% PVMT 1,304 0.03 0.37ak PVMT 1,310 0.03 0.37% PVMT 250 0.01 0.07% TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 14,239 0.33 3.99% PROPOSED LOT COVERAGES BUILDING 307,357 7.06 10.74% ALL IMPROVMENTS 1,477,583 33.92 2&04% FRONT YARD 356,492 8.18 1132% SLTCE DRAWINGSI200M00004SILot 2LAug 2007 Redesignllmpemious Area Calc (Parts/ A).xls PROPOSED % ISLANDS IN PARKING AREA AREA (SF) AREA (AC) PVMT, WALKS & GREEN AREAS 64,602 1.48 ISLAND -136 0.00 ISLAND -376 -0.01 ISLAND -4,484 -0.10 ISLAND -289 -0.01 ISLAND -390 -0.01 ISLAND -394 -0.01 ISLAND -322 -0.01 ISLAND -320 -0.01 ISLAND -318 -0.01 TOTAL PARKING AREA 57,572 1.32 ISLAND 136 0.00 ISLAND 376 0.01 ISLAND 4,484 0.10 ISLAND 289 0.01 ISLAND 390 0.01 ISLAND 394 0.01 ISLAND 322 0.01 ISLAND 320 0.01 ISLAND 318 0.01 TOTAL ISLAND AREA 7,030 0.16 TOTAL PARKING AREA 57,572 1.32 TOTAL ISLAND AREA 7,030 0.16 TOTAL PARKING & ISLAND AREA 64,602 1.48 PROPOSED % ISLANDS WITHIN PARKING AREA = TOTAL ISLAND AREA / TOTAL PARKING & ISLAND AREA = PROPOSED ISLAND AREA = 10.88% S:I_TCE DRAWINGSI2000120000481Lot 21_Aug 2007 Redesign Umpervious Area Calcs (Lot 2).x1s revised 09/07/09 sq. ft. 0.01 acres sq.ft, 0.01 acres 64,602.17 sq. ft. 1.48 acres 1007. — (57,571.92 sq.ft. 1.32 acres/64,602.17 sq.ft. 1.45 acres, —389.67 sq. ft. 0.01 acres 100% — 89.1% = 10.99 ISLANDS IN PARKING AREA —259.38 sq. ft. 0.01 acres —4,484.32 sq.ft. 0.10 acres —136.06 sq. R. 0.00 acres —376.13 sq. ft. 0.01 acres —394,07 sq. ft. 0.01 ccres —322.07 sq. ft. 0.01 acres —320. 14 sq. fl. 0.01 acres —318.41 sq. ft, 0.01 acres 57,571.92 sq. ft 1.37 acres 318.41 sq.ft. 0.01 ocres SE Group - Planning and Design 131 Chruch Street, Burlington, Vermont 05401 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST Project Name Technology Park - Lot #2 Drawing Referenced: Planting Plans L1.0 & L1.1 Date Prepared: August 24, 2007 Date of Prices: Summer 2007 Project Status: Revisions: Sheet 1 of 3 KEY ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST SUB TOTAL REMARKS TREES AC Serviceberry 19 EA. $375.00 $7,125.00 64 AF Red Maple 'Autumn Blaze' 10 EA. $655.00 $6,550.00 2 1/2-3" Cal. AR Red Maple 22 EA. $525.00 $11,550.00 2 1/2-3" Cal. GT Shade Master Honeylocust 12 EA. $508.26 $6,099.12 2 1/2-3" Cal. MS Sargent Crabapple 38 EA. $472.50 $17,955.00 2-2 1/2" Cal. PC Chanticleer Pear 8 EA. $537.50 $4,300.00 2 1/2-3" Cal. PG White Spruce 24 EA. $262.50 $6,300.00 5-6' PN Austrian Pine 13 EA. $460.00 $5,980.00 7-8' PS White Pine 20 EA. $362.50 $7,250.00 7-8' QP Pin Oak 61 EA. $590.00 $35,990.00 2 1/2-3" Cal. SR Japanese Lilac 18 EA. $515.00 $9,270.00 8-10' Sub -Total $118,369.12 SE Group - Planning and Design 131 Church Street, Burlington, Vermont 04501 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST Project Name Technology Park - Lot #2 Drawing Referenced: Planting Plans L1.0 & Ll.I Date Prepared: August 24, 2007 Date of Prices: Summer 2007 Project Status: Revisions: Sheet 2 of 3 KEY ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST SUB TOTAL REMARKS Shrubs CR Gray Dogwood 72 EA. $55.00 $3,960.00 30-36" CS Red Dogwood 240 EA. $55.00 $13,200.00 3 Gal. IV Winterberry 18 EA. $41.25 $742.50 3 Gal. JH Bar Harbor Juniper 322 EA. $44.38 $14,288.75 2 Gal. TC Spreading Yew 118 EA. $111.88 $13,201.25 24-30" SP Shirobana Spirea 9 EA. $41.88 $376.88 18-24" Sub -Total $45,769.38 SE Group - Planning and Design 131 Church Street, Burlington, Vermont 05401 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST Project Name Technology Park - Lot #2 Drawing Referenced: Planting Plans L 1.0 & L L I Date Prepared: August 24, 2007 Date of Prices: Summer 2007 Project Status: Revisions: Sheet 3 of 3 KEY ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST SUB TOTAL REMARKS Perennials CB Bugbane 239 EA. $14.00 $3,346.00 1 Gal. CL Pink Turtlehead 400 EA. $14.00 $5,600.00 1 Gal. CP Marsh Marigold 211 EA. $14.00 $2,954.00 1 Gal. FR Meadowsweet 306 EA. $14.00 $4,284.00 1 Gal. IR Blue Flag Iris 149 EA. $14.00 $2,086.00 1 Gal. PT Pachysandra 973 EA. $0.50 $486.50 Bare Root RE Black-eyed Susan 439 EA. $14.00 $6,146.00 1 Gal. Sub -Total $24,902.50 Shrub Sub -Total $45,769.00 Tree Sub -Total $118,369.12 Total $189,040.62 ti legal Parties entitled to participate are the Municipality, the Municipal Planning Commission, the Re- gional Planning Commission, adjoining property owners, other interested persons granted party status pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c). Non-party participants may also be allowed under 10 V.S.A. § 6085(c)(5). Dated in Essex Junction, Vermont, this 27 day of August, 2007. By Stephanie H. Monaghan Natural Resources Board District 4 Coordinator 111 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 T/ 802-879-5662 E/ stephanie.monaghan@state. vt.us CITY OF BURLINGTON TRAFFIC REGULATIONS The following traffic regulations are hereby enacted by the Public Works Commission as amendments to Appendix C, Motor Vehicles, and the City of Burlington's Code of Ordinances: Sec. 7A. Handicap spaces desig nated. No person shall park any vehicle at any time in the following Locations, except automobiles displaying special handicapped license plates issued pursuant to 18 V.S.A. 1325, or any amendment or renumbering thereof: (1) through (142) As Written (143) [Reserved.] In the space in front of 31 SDrinq Street. (144) through (150) As Written (1 1) In the space in front of 3 Rose Street. Adopted this 5th day of Septem- ber 2007 by the Board of Public Works Commissioners: Attest Norman Baldwin, P.E. Assistant Director -Technical Services Adopted 8/5/2007 Material in [Brackets] delete. Material underlined add. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURL- INGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Halt Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, October 2, 2007 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Conditional use application CU- 07-04 of Te[Jet Longhaut, LLC to amend a previously approved plan for a 275,000 sq. ft. mixed used building. The amendment consists of installing a 30 foot high tele- communications antenna on the roof, 30 Community Drive. 2. Conditional use application CU- 07-56 of Te[Jet Longhaut, LLC to amend a previously approved plan for a 30,000 sq. ft. light manu- facturing facility. The amendment consists of installing a 30 inch high telecommunications antenna on the roof, 35 Thompson Street. 3. Preliminary plat application SD- 07-56 & final plat application SD- 07-57 of Pizzagalli Properties, LLC for a planned unit development to consist of a 10,000 sq. ft. medical office building, 185 Tilley Drive. 4. Final plat application SD-07-55 of R.L. Vallee, Inc. for a planned unit development to: 1) raze an existing 2313 sq, ft. service station and convenience store, 2) construct a 2313 sq. ft. build- ing consisting of 1079 sq. ft. of convenience store use and 1234 sq. ft. of short-order restaurant use, and 3) reducing the number of fueling positions from eight (8) to six (6), 811 Williston Road. 5. Preliminary plat application SD-07-59 & final plat application SD-07-60 of Leduc Farm, Inc. to: 1) subdivide five (5) lots, and 2) adjust property lines of three (3) lots, Cheesefactory Road & Cheesefactory Lane. 6. Preliminary plat application SD-07-61 & final plat applica- tion SD-07-62 of Technology Park Partners to subdivide a 65.62 acre parcel into two (2) parcels of 5.0 acres and 60.62 acres, 30 Comm- unity Drive. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN SUPERIOR COURT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Trustee, \Plaintiff ington, v I U54UJ, an Answer to plaintiff's Complaint in the above entitled action within forty-one (41) days after the date of the first publication of this Summons, which is 9/12/07. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the Complaint. Your Answer must also be filed with the Court. Unless otherwise provided in Rule 13(a). Your Answer must state as a Counterclaim any related claim which you may have against the plaintiff, or you will thereafter be barred from making such claim in any other action. YOUR ANSWER MUST STATE SUCH A COUNTERCLAIM WHETHER OR NOT THE RELIEF DEMANDED IN THE COMPLAINT IS FOR DAM- AGE COVERED BY A LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY UNDER WHICH THE INSURER HAS THE RIGHT OR OBLIGATION TO CONDUCT THE DEFENSE. If you believe that the plaintiff is not entitled to all or part of the claim set forth in the Complaint, or if you believe that you have a Counterclaim against the plaintiff, you may wish to consult an attorney. If you feel that you cannot afford to pay an attorney's fee, you may ask the clerk of the Court for information about places where you may seek Legal assistance. Plaintiff's action is a Complaint in Foreclosure which alleges that you have breached the terms of a Promissory Note and Mortgage Deed dated November 7, 2005. Plaintiffs action may effect your interest in the property described in the Land Records of the City of Burlington at Volume 941, Page 220. The Complaint also seeks relief on the Promissory Note executed by you. A copy of the Complaint is on file and may be obtained at the Office of the Clerk of the Superior Court for the County of Chittenden, State of Vermont. It appearing from Affidavit duly filed in the above entitled action that service cannot be made with due diligence by any of the meth- ods prescribed in V.R.C.P. 4(d) through (f) inclusive, it is hereby ORDERED that service of the above process shall be made upon defen- dant, Robert Johnson, by publica- tion pursuant to V.R.C.P. 4(g). This Order shall be published once a week for three consecutive weeks on 9/12/07, 9/19/07 and 9/26/07 in the Seven Days Newspaper. A copy of this Order shalt be mailed to defendants at their address if their address is known. Dated at Burlington, Vermont this 27th day of August, 2007. Hon. Matthew I. Katz Presiding Judge ' 4ITTENDEN COUNTY, SS ., Bank National Association, As Trustee JPMORGAN INVESTMENT BANK (JPMMAC) SECURITIZATION, Plaintiff V. Boudee Luangrath, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. as nominee for Fieldstone Mort- gage Company, And Occupants residing at 36 St. Louis Street, Burlington, Vermont, Defendants SUMMONS & ORDER FOR PUBLICA- TION TO THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANT Boudee Luangrath You are hereby summoned and required to serve upon Corey J. Fortin, Plaintiffs attorney, whose address is 30 Kimball Avenue, Suite 306, South Burlington, VT 05403, an Answer to plaintiff's Complaint in the above entitled action within forty-one (41) days after the date of the first publication of this Summons, which is 9/12/07. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the Complaint. Your Answer must also be filed with the Court. Unless otherwise provided in Rule 13(a). Your Answer must state as a Counterclaim any related claim which you may have against the plaintiff, or you will thereafter be barred from making such claim in any other action. YOUR ANSWER MUST STATE SUCH A COUNTERCLAIM WHETHER OR NOT THE RELIEF DEMANDED IN THE COMPLAINT IS FOR DAM- AGE COVERED BY A LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY UNDER WHICH THE INSURER HAS THE RIGHT OR OBLIGATION TO CONDUCT THE DEFENSE. If you believe that the plaintiff is not entitled to all or part of the claim set forth in the Complaint, or if you believe that you have a Counterclaim against the plaintiff, you may wish to consult an attorney. If you feel that you cannot afford to pay an attorney's fee, you may ask the clerk of the Court for information about places where you may seek legal assistance. interest in the property de in the Land Records of the of Burlington at Volume 91 Page 434. The Complaint z seeks relief on the Promis Note executed by you. A c the Complaint is on file ar be obtained at the Office i Clerk of the Superior Court County of Chittenden, Sta' Vermont. It appearing from Affidavi filed in the above entitled that service cannot be ma due diligence by any of th ods prescribed in V.R.C.P. through (f) inclusive, it is ORDERED that service of t above process shall be mz defendant, Boudee Luangi publication pursuant to V. 4(g). This Order shall be l once a week for three cor weeks on 9/12/07, 9/19/ 9/26/07 in the Seven Dal paper. A copy of this Ord be mailed to defendants address if their address is Dated at Burlington, Vern 27th day of August, 200 Hon. Matthew I. Katz Presiding Judge Chittenden Superior Cour STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, S'. IN RE: R.C. Vermont Fami Chittenden County Docket No. 335-8-07 CnJ NOTICE OF HEARING TO: Christina Cota, Moth You are hereby notified t merits hearing to consid- fitness to act as parent t wit[ be held on October at 8:30 a.m. at the Fam of Vermont, Chittenden l 32 Cherry Street, Burling mont. You are notified tc in connection with this Hon. James R. Crucitti Family Court Judge Town of Middlebury Request for Qualificati Cross Street Bridge Pro The Town of Middlebury qualification statements consultants in the areas development planning, and transportation plan related to the financial phase for the Cross Stre Construction Project. TV RFQ is available online middlebury.govoffice.co cations are due at the P Town Offices no later th This week's puzzle answers. Puzzles on page 55a. numueannuou R A F T M I @ L L A M U S A D A M M S L Robert Johnson, ^ a 'mmon :1 ©MIZ Awwww�w R A F T M I @ L L A M U S A D A M M S L Robert Johnson, ^ a 'mmon :1 ©MIZ Awwww�w September 13, 2007 Ray Belair Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: Technology Park — Lot 2 Dear Mr. Belair: TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) tel: 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 www.trudellconsulting.com In response to the comments of the sketch plan review for Lot #2 regarding review by the Fire Chief I have attached an analysis of fire flows that was prepared for Technology Park Partners and a copy of the site plan depicting the layout of the water main. Please forward these for review as appropriate. Very truly yours, CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) Richard P. Trudell, P.E. Encl. Fire flow analysis Site plan P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Road Williston, Vermont 05495 Civil Engineering, Surveying, Land Planning, Water and Wastewater, Landscape Architecture. Roadway Design, Permitting ad PROJECT MEMO To: Technology Park Partners From: Dick Trudell Date: 6/20/2007 Re: Fire Flow analysis — Lot 2 Project #: 2000048-6 A hydrant test was conducted on 7/ 11 /2006. Hydrant # 422, located at the intersection of Kimball Avenue and Shunpike Road, was the residual hydrant and a hydrant adjacent to Lot 7 in the park was opened with a flow of 888 gpm with a drop in pressure from 68 psi (static) to 64 psi (residual). Based on those results, Champlain Water District estimated hydrant # 422 could provide 3397 gpm at a residual pressure of 20 psi. The needed fire flow for the proposed building on Lot 2 is governed by the current sprinkler system code where 500 gpm at a pressure of 100 psi is required at the highest standpipe in the system. Since 100 psi pressure is not available in the municipal system, three separate analyses will be undertaken. 1. A flow of 888 gpm to match the hydrant test flow 2. Based on the needed fire flow for a 54,460 sf building (18,153/floor) delivered to the proposed building entrance by the municipal main 3. A flow of 500 gpm delivered to the proposed building entrance Construction Factor - C C = 18 F (A)0.5 where F=0.8 (masonry/steel — Construction Class 4) and A = 100% of one floor and 50% others C = 18 x 0.8 x (0 8153 +2(18153/2))0"' = 2744 Rounded to the nearest 250 gpm = 2750 gpm Occupancy Factor - O Limited Combustible (C-2) O = 0.85 Exposure and Communication Factor — (X+P) Distance to nearest building 70 ft (proposed), width 75 ft Needed Fire Flow 1i NFF = CO (1 +(X+P)) NFF = 2750 (0.85) (1.06) = 2477 gpm rounded to 2500 gpm Ir TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Road Williston, VT 05495 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 tiudeliconsuiting.com Point E 40, - 6„ DI ` New Hyd 119, �s Elev 340 ey Point D FFE 343 Point A 240' - 8" DI 65' -10" DI New Hyd Elev 3" / 346' - 8" DI /� !G Point C Point B Schematic Waterline Lavout 120' - 24" DI Hyd 422 Elev 360 From Hydrant #422 there is 120 ft of 24-inch DI to the point of connection of the 10-inch main (Point A). From Point A to the 8-inch service (Point B) there is 55 ft of 10-inch DI. From Point B to the intersection (Point C and new hydrant) there is 345 ft of 8-inch DI. From Point C to the end hydrant (Point D) there is 240 ft of 8-inch. From Point D to the building entrance (Point E) there is 40 ft of 6-inch Dl. 1. For a Needed FireHow of 2500 gpm the residual pressure at Hydrant # 422 is: Q-_ (P�P2� 2500 = (68 — PZ 4 Cy =(PS — P')o.sa 888 = (68 — 64)o.sa Solving for P2 2500 gpm at a residual of 41.1 psi 2. For a sprinkler Row of 500 gpm the residual pressure at Hydrant # 422 is: (PS — Pz 0 500 = (68 — Pz Q, =(PS — P,) 888 = (68 — 64) 0.54 Solving for P2 500 gpm at a residual of 66.6 psi Ir TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Road Williston, V► OS49S 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 trudellconsulting.com At the beginning of the 10-inch service (Point A) 1. At a flow of 888 gpm, the residual pressure is 64.4 psi. (Note the higher pressure is due to a lower elevation and tracing back along the normal How direction in the 24-inch pipe). 2. At a flow of 2500 gpm (NFF), the residual pressure is 41.5 psi. 3. At a flow of 500 gpm (sprinkler standpipe) the residual pressure is 67.0 psi. At the beginning of the 8-inch service (Point B) 4. At a flow of 888 gpm, the residual pressure is 64.3 psi. 5. At a flow of 2500 gpm (NFF), the residual pressure is 43.0 psi. 6. At a flow of 500 gpm (sprinkler standpipe) the residual pressure is 69.2 psi. At the intersection and new hydrant (Point C) 7. At a flow of 888 gpm, the residual pressure is 64.8 psi. 8. At a flow of 2500 gpm (NFF), the residual pressure is 33.7 psi. 9. At a flow of 500 gpm (sprinkler standpipe) the residual pressure is 70.8 psi. At the end hydrant (Point D) 10. At a flow of 888 gpm, the residual pressure is 65.3 psi. 11. At a flow of 2500 gpm (NFF), the residual pressure is 27.5 psi. 12. At a flow of 500 gpm (sprinkler standpipe) the residual pressure is 72.1 psi. At the building entrance (Point E) 13. At a flow of 888 gpm, the residual pressure is 63.3 psi. 14. At a flow of 2500 gpm (NFF), the residual pressure is 20.6 psi. 15. At a flow of 500 gpm (sprinkler standpipe) the residual pressure is 70.0 psi TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Road Williston, VT 05495 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 trudellconsulting.com �T PROJECT MEMO To: Mr. Ray Belair From: William Park Date: 10/02/07 Re: Tech Park Lot 2 - Stormwater Project #: 2007100 Mr. Belair, On behalf of Technology Park Partners, Trudell Consulting Engineers is submitting a revised stormwater design brief to reflect the most recent set of plans. A draft of the design brief was submitted on 9/13/07 to Tom DiPietro. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions or comments. Thanks. —Will Park Ir TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Road Williston, Vr 05495 802-879-6331 fax: 802-879-0060 trudellconsulting.com STORMWATER DESIGN BRIEF For TECHNOLOGY PARK — LOTS 2 & 3 South Burlington, Vermont Prepared by: William W. Park, E.I. Jeremy M. Matosky, P.E. Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) P.O. Box 308 478 Blair Park Williston, Vermont 05495 Applicant: Technology Park Partners 30 Community Drive Suite 4 South Burlington, VT. 05403 Date: October 2, 2007 TCE #2007100 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2. RECEIVING WATERS 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS Page 1 1 1 4. PREVIOUSLY PERMITTED STORM W ATER SYSTEM 1 5. PROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM 2 APPENDIX • Exhibit 1: USGS Location Map • Exhibit 2: Soil Map • Exhibit 3: Pre -Development Drainage Area Map & Hydrologic Calculations for 10-Year, 24-Hour Storm Event • Exhibit 4: Post -Development Drainage Area Map & Hydrologic Calculations for 10-Year, 24-Hour Storm Event • Exhibit 5: Post -Development Hydrologic Calculations for 1-Year, 24-Hour Storm Event • Exhibit 6: Post -Development Hydrologic Calculations for a 0.9" Storm Event with Exact Modified CN Numbers • Exhibit 7: Project Plans & Details Technology Park Lots 2 & 3 — South Burlington, Vermont 1. Project Description: Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) has completed an analysis to evaluate stormwater treatment practices that would meet Vermont Stormwater Treatment Standards (April 2002) required for a proposed office buildings and associated parking on Lots 2 and 3 of Technology Park in South Burlington, Vermont. Technology Park Partners received Discharge Permit #1-1458 to discharge stormwater from Lots 2 and 3 of Technology Park off Kimball Avenue in South Burlington, Vermont to Potash Brook. This permit expired on March 31, 2006. A request for a Title 3 extension was submitted prior to the expiration of this permit. Lots 2 and 3 are currently covered under Title 3 until an individual or general permit is issued for Potash Brook. The proposed project includes a three story office building and associated parking on each lot along, a community bike path, and a shared access drive from Community Drive to the east. The parking areas and access drive will utilize curbs and a closed catch basin system that drains to one of two Extended Detention Shallow Wetlands. 2. Receiving Waters: The receiving water from the project is Potash Brook. 3. Existing Conditions: The undeveloped portion of Technology Park is an open meadow. A drainage divide exists in the middle of the park between Potash Brook and Muddy Brook. Stormwater runoff sheet flows off the site and into an existing Class II wetland located on Lot 1, created by the sewer line (constructed in 1977) servicing the Technology Park Center. Due to the existing discharge permits for other lots in Technology Park, the one discharge point for this project has been designated as S/N003. The location of the one discharge point is at the outlet of the culvert under the man-made berm for the sewer line, east of Community Drive. The soil underlying the site is identified in the Chittenden County Soil Survey as Vergennes clay, 2 to 6 percent slopes, HSG D, very low permeability. 4. Previously Permitted Stormwater System: The following description of the previously permitted stormwater system is taken from the Manner of Discharge for S/N003 from Discharge Permit #1-1458: Stormwater runoff from the two buildings is conveyed via overland flow and grassed swales to the Class II wetland and detention pond 3 prior to discharge to Potash Brook. The first inch of stormwater runoff from the associated parking is conveyed via a closed system to one of two pocket wetlands for treatment then to the Class II wetland and detention pond 3 prior to discharge to Potash Brook. 2 Technology Park Lots 2 & 3 — South Burlington, Vermont 5. Proposed Stormwater System: S/N003: • Amount of impervious area: o Existing: 0.00 acres o Redeveloped: 0.00 acres o New: 4.89 acres • Receiving water identification: Potash Brook • Cold/Warm Fish Habitat Designation for Receiving water: Cold water fish habitat • Location of Discharge Point: o N44°27' 10" o W 73° 08' 47" • Water Quality Treatment Standard (WQv): This treatment standard was met using two Extended Detention Shallow Wetlands (W-2). The HydroCAD 8.00 model of the project was adjusted using the exact Modified Curve number calculation to accurately model the Water Quality storm event. The inverts of the catch basins discharging to the constructed wetland were adjusted to ensure the Water Quality storm event enters the two constructed wetlands, with excess bypassing the system. In general, the Lot 2 constructed wetland treats stormwater runoff from Lot 2 and the Lot 3 constructed wetland treats stormwater runoff from Lot 3 and the shared access drive. The following tables show the base data that was used in determining the depths and surface areas required in each wetland to meet the treatment standard: Table 1: Drainage Area Characteristics WQv (c.f.) DA (s.f.) Mod CN Lot 2 6,900 130,885 97.3 Lot 3 7,994 210,820 94.6 Table 2: Lot 2 Wetland Data Pool Depth in. Surface Area s.f. Storage c.f. 0" 3388 4808 6" 2508 3334 18" 1379 1397 Table 3: Lot 3 Wetland Data Pool Depth in. Surface Area s.f. Storage c.f. 0" 4624 7613 6" 3768 5522 -18- 2226 2540 Technology Park Lots 2 & 3 — South Burlington, Vermont Table 4: Treatment Standard Requirements for W-2 Wetland # % of WQv cu. ft. Min. Surface Area Allocation (sq. ft.) Min. Permenant Pool Volume Allocation Allowable ED Volume Foreba y Deep Pool (>_ 4') � 6„ 18 o �� of DA Deep Pool (� 4,) <_ 6" 6" to 18" Regs. 10% 25% 5% 25% 50% 1.0% of DA 20% Min. 35% 45% Lot 2 - Required 690 1725 345 1725 3450 1309 262 458 589 Lot 2 - Current 2582 4808 1474 3411 2776 8865 3388 880 1129 Lot 3 - Required 7 99 1999 1 400 1999 3997 2108 422 738 949 Lot 3 - Current 11557 7613 1 2091 5073 3147 8858 4624 856 1542 Each wetland has a 4 foot deep forebay and permanent pool, a high marsh area (less than 6" water depth), a low marsh area (water depth between 6" and 18"), a controlled outlet with low flow orifices and riser, and an emergency spillway. Due to the space limitations of the site, the wetland slopes have been designed to eliminate the need for safety and aquatic benches. The wetlands have been graded with 4:1 side slopes in the permanent pool areas and 3:1 side slopes from the permanent pool to the top of the berm. A minimum flow path of 2:1 has been provided across each stormwater wetland. The required landscaping elements have been incorporated in each wetland. Adequate space for maintenance access has been provided to each wetland. Stormwater runoff from the portions of the community bike path that does not enter either of the wetlands will be treated via vegetative disconnection. • Groundwater Recharge Treatment Standard (Rev): This treatment standard is waived due to the soils underlying the site. Vergennes clay has an Hydrologic Soil Group of D, with a corresponding recharge factor of zero, therefore this treatment standard is waived. • Channel Protection Treatment Standard (CPv): The Channel Protection Treatment Standard requires the 12-hour extended detention (ED) of the 1-year, 24-hour rainfall event. This treatment standard is met by providing the detention time provided by the one -inch minimum orifice size (37 minutes) at the most downstream controlled outlet on Lot 1. An overflow weir has been set above the peak elevation of the 1-year, 24-hour rainfall event to control larger storms. A debris rack will be provided on the outlet structure to prevent clogging of the orifice. Stormwater } Technology Park Lots 2 & 3 — South Burlington, Vermont • Overbank Protection Treatment Standard (Qplo): The Overbank Flood Protection Treatment Standard requires that the post -development peak discharge rate not exceed the pre -development peak discharge rate for the 10-year, 24-hour storm event. The pre -development and post -development runoff rates for the 10- year, 24-hour storm were calculated using HydroCAD stormwater modeling software. The pre- and post -development discharge rates are 8.40 cfs and 2.14 cfs, respectively, therefore this treatment standard is met. • Extreme Flood Protection Treatment Standard (QpIoo): The Extreme Flood Protection Standard requires that the post -development peak discharge rate shall not exceed the pre -development peak discharge rate for the 100-year, 24-hour storm event. The requirement is waived for sites that contain less than 10 acres of impervious area. This site contains 4.89 acres of impervious area and therefore the requirement is waived. • Manner of Discharge: Stormwater runoff from the parking areas, access drive, and portions of the rooftop are conveyed via sheet flow and a closed catch basin system to one of two Extended Detention Shallow Wetlands with controlled outlet devices. These wetlands discharge to Class II wetland with a controlled outlet device that discharges to culvert that discharges to Potash Brook. EXHIBIT 1: USGS LOCATION MAP 0 3° 9'00 " 7 °0 ' 0 40 ■ Z . rp Z O O l •• i IV L-t `(. — 2. o � o o � io io o 15°W 0 03 9'0.0 °0' 03 8'0.0" Name: BURLINGTON Date: 8/30/2007 Location: 044° 27' 06.23" N 073° 08' 31.32" W Caption: Project Location Map Scale: 1 inch equals 667 feet Technology Park Lots 2 3 + + Gopynght(G) IYYI, Maptech, Inc. EXHIBIT 2: SOIL MAP Soil Map—Chittenden County, Vermont (Technology Park Lots 2-3) N Meters A 0 100 200 400 600 Feet 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 OSDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0 10/2/2007 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4 MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Units Special Point Features Blowout ® Borrow Pit X Clay Spot ♦ Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot (dt Landfill 1 Lava Flow 4L Marsh st Mine or Quarry po Miscellaneous Water p Perennial Water v Rock Outcrop t Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot p Sinkhole y> Slide or Slip 0 Sodic Spot Spoil Area Q Stony Spot Soil Map—Chittenden County, Vermont (Technology Park Lots 2-3) Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Gully Short Steep Slope Other Political Features Municipalities 0 Cities Urban Areas Water Features F. , Oceans Streams and Canals Transportation ... Rails Roads ,hr Interstate Highways US Routes State Highways Local Roads Other Roads MAP INFORMATION Original soil survey map sheets were prepared at publication scale. Viewing scale and printing scale, however, may vary from the original. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for proper map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov Coordinate System: UTM Zone 18N This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Chittenden County, Vermont Survey Area Data: Version 10, Sep 26, 2007 Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 4/25/1999 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. LSDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0 10/2/2007 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 4 Soil Map-Chittenden County, Vermont Map Unit Legend Technology Park Lots 2-3 Chittenden County, Vermont (VT007) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AO1 Percent of AOI AdA Adams and Windsor loamy 18.1 5.9% sands, 0 to 5 percent slopes Adams and Windsor loamy AdB 8.3 2.7% sands, 5 to 12 percent slopes 10.8 3.5% AdD Adams and Windsor loamy sands, 12 to 30 percent slopes 0.6% AdE Adams and Windsor loamy 1.8 sands, 30 to 60 percent slopes 7.2 2.3% An Alluvial land BIA Belgrade and Eldridge soils, 0 7.6 2.5% to 3 percent slopes Cv Covington silty day 45.5 14.8% EwA Enosburg and Whately soils, 0 9.0 2.9% to 3 percent slopes FaC Farmington extremely rocky 4.9 1.6% loam, 5 to 20 percent slopes FsB Farmington -Stockbridge rocky 0.1 0.0% loams, 5 to 12 percent slopes HnA Hinesburg fine sandy loam, 0 to 6.6 2.2% 3 percent slopes 10.2 3.3% HnB Hinesburg fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes HnE Hinesburg fine sandy loam, 25 2.8 0.9% to 60 percent slopes Lf Limerick silt loam, very wet 10.7 3.5% MuD Munson and Belgrade silt 4.8 1.6% loams, 12 to 25 percent slopes ScA Scantic silt loam, 0 to 2 percent 12.1 3.9% slopes TeE Terrace escarpments, silty and 2.1 0.7% clayey VeB Vergennes day, 2 to 6 percent 124.2 40.5% slopes VeC Vergennes day, 6 to 12 percent 7.2 2.3% slopes VeD Vergennes day, 12 to 25 7.1 2.3% percent slopes VeE Vergennes day, 25 to 60 3.3 1.1 % percent slopes W Water 2.7 0.9% Totals for Area of Interest (AOI) I 307.01 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.0 10/2/2007 Sri Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 EXHIBIT 3: PRE -DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA MAP & HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS FOR 10-YEAR, 24-HOUR STORM EVENT w . O A BROW 1 TWE CMOFNmAnoN ,\ , ��. \\ ✓ / / \\ .--- ---- --- — ~. • • . , ' . DRAINAGE AREA ' ..... •• \ .. ... BOUNDARY (TYP.) /' \ •• - \ -" "\�� _ - ` v / / \ e \-- • zr•`coNCRETE vFE :CLASS 2 eETLAND !DRAINAGE AREA 1 -._ a LOT 1 •t 50' WILAND / BUFFER -- _.. ....... LOT 2 / o. '_.., .._ ._. LOT � •, \ . __ _.._-_ --- --- 0% � 0 0 0 �••\\ \ \ •- / O Graphic Scale OR— Feet •` , •t' ' ,; / 60 0 60 120 180 240 Ir TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 478 V,* Park Poad P.Q B0x 306 (80218A-6331(pMW WMW..M Vam M 054" (8D21874006IXfmJ Vldt Ib on dw Web ab YAYw.7mde0Cpu4tlh8.mm — — No __ — na evroa. as CONQlTUAL ArROVAL AmALLSVOry i.. ParlJMe1ART ArraOVAL 9IDM690N 'i AR 270 SrlaMtSS10N f ARIICAeIl MAL A VAL SUB SSM CONSTRIXIM oaAw Fr.,aa roc 2 Dra.Fy Mwb M canebu.IFn yoyFrl� ro 6a uwE F �s..pna 1MY w y�.aM :a e. w.M. N%I .,o. a.. es�•+ n ay o. m M a 9Y u.. of h.a eYv.Fp� mnarrvcam er rM RoJ,c; LFn4Ym• wicv rMY.a.',..fah mJ bml WO..� As RevN , to plan 00M/W XXX I ftoject We TECHNOLOGY PARK LOTS 2 & 3 Community Drive South Burlington, VI' sh.atrIft Pre-Development Drainage Area Map Dram4n8 N2ar:ber: 2o00048-39 Exbern& : i HOJGd--weS: .AIM _Drawn• ww Date: 08/31/07 F.B. 000 Stile : 1• = 60' Project rlFaalCl : XXX X4W: 2000048dc Baku Fee • xxx Appmved SN03 S/ 03 P1 Lot #1 and 3 ODA1 Drainage Area 1 5ukiif Reach On Link Drainage Diagram for Lots 2&3, PRE 02 Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) 8/30/2007 HydroCAD® 8.00 s/n 002428 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Lots 2&3, PRE 02 Type/1 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Page 2 HydroCAD® 8.00 s/n 002428 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/30/2007 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment DA1: Drainage Area 1 Runoff Area=845,888 sf Runoff Depth>1.14" Flow Length=1,177' Tc=50.5 min CN=78 Runoff=14.37 cfs 1.841 of Reach SN03: S/N003 Inflow=8.40 cfs 1.828 of Outflow=8.40 cfs 1.828 of Pond P1: Lot #1 Pond 3 Peak Elev=332.26' Storage=18,237 cf Inflow=14.37 cfs 1.841 of 21.0" x 130.0' Culvert Outflow=8.40 cfs 1.828 of Total Runoff Area = 19.419 ac Runoff Volume = 1.841 of Average Runoff Depth = 1.14" 100.00% Pervious Area = 19.419 ac 0.00% Impervious Area = 0.000 ac Lots 2&3, PRE 02 Type // 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Page 3 HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 002428 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/30/2007 Subcatchment DA1: Drainage Area 1 Runoff = 14.37 cfs @ 12.52 hrs, Volume= 1.841 af, Depth> 1.14" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Area (sf) CN Description 845,888 78 Meadow, non -grazed, HSG D 845,888 Pervious Area Tc (min) Length (feet) Slope (ft/ft) Velocity (ft/sec) Capacity Description (cfs) 16.8 100 0.0200 0.10 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 1.7 100 0.0200 0.99 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt2 Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 32.0 977 0.0180 0.51 0.68 Parabolic Channel, Tt3 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.035 Earth, dense weeds 50.5 1,177 Total Reach SN03: S/N003 Inflow Area = 19.419 ac, Inflow Depth > 1.13" for 10-Year event Inflow = 8.40 cfs @ 12,97 hrs, Volume= 1.828 of Outflow = 8.40 cfs @ 12.97 hrs, Volume= 1.828 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Pond P1: Lot #1 Pond 3 Inflow Area = 19.419 ac, Inflow Depth > 1.14" for 10-Year event Inflow = 14.37 cfs @ 12.52 hrs, Volume= 1.841 of Outflow = 8.40 cfs @ 12.97 hrs, Volume= 1.828 af, Atten= 42%, Lag= 26.7 min Primary = 8.40 cfs @ 12.97 hrs, Volume= 1.828 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 332.26' @ 12.97 hrs Surf.Area= 27,488 sf Storage= 18,237 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 25.8 min calculated for 1.828 of (99% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 23.2 min ( 856.3 - 833.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 330.50' 230,843 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Lots 2&3, PRE 02 Type 1124-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Page 4 HydroCADO 8.00 s/n 002428 © 2006 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC 8/30/2007 Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 330.50 100 0 0 331.00 2,240 585 585 332.00 20,400 11,320 11,905 333.00 47,200 33,800 45,705 334.00 87,680 67,440 113,145 335.00 147,715 117,698 230,843 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 330.58' 21.0" x 130.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.600 Outlet Invert= 330.01' S= 0.0044 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean Primary OutFlow Max=8.40 cfs @ 12.97 hrs HW=332.26' (Free Discharge) Z1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 8.40 cfs @ 4.52 fps) EXHIBIT 4: POST -DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE AREA MAP A HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS FOR 10-YEAR, 24-HOUR STORM EVENT Graphic Scale Feet 60 0 60 120 180 240 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (ICE) 478Mdr?Wk Pad r.0.&w" W2)97MM1Wp e) MAIM 4 V-4 0505 MM 87400608nd VM 18 m the Web at www.�,mm real nan wu annar roe M ruroxa COM[71RIAL ARROVAL ADMLSSION PauwHwar A Ov_ A/M6vON Act M StlM651011 ■ AMCAMS i APPROVAL SUBMMS O COM7ala:71ON DlAWNCs "a+ L.,,.r r.,� B.H .' t. plm 00/b0/OU x10( Na. DCsalpUm __.. __. Daec 6J' MANI— TECHNOLOGY PARK LOTS 2&3 Community Drive South Burlington, VT Sheet Tide Post-Development Drainage Area Map DmVAM Number: 2000048-39 F]dunion: __1 P-j-dl -w-: wM Drawn: M1P Date 1 06/31/97 F.B. 000 SC41e 1 I- . 60' Pn1Jed Ido" a xxx X4W. 2000046dc Bench FM : xxx App—d POST SN03 S/ 7 3 A1 CD Offsite of #qnd I � 1 � ( DA5� i Dumpster Area CB4 2 i W3 CB � 1 � � 1 � Catch Basin #4� Lot 2 ED W land Lot 3 Wetland CB MH8 I 1 Dr ai Manhole #8 CB cB CB11 MH9 �DA4 ' cB D 1P Lot 2 Rooftop Roof Drain DMH#10 0Subcat i— Reach on Link Catch sin #11 Drain M Whole #9 CDA2 ' DA3 ) Lot 2 Lot 3 Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 1l 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment DA1: Offsite Runoff Area=512,084 sf 1.12% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.14" Flow Length=1,160' Tc=53.2 min CN=78 Runoff=8.36 cfs 1.113 of Subcatchment DA2: Lot 2 Runoff Area=106,089 sf 68.79% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.20" Flow Length=280' Tc=5.4 min CN=92 Runoff=9.62 cfs 0.447 of Subcatchment DA3: Lot 3 Runoff Area=210,820 sf 50.71% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.91" Flow Length=1,314' Tc=46.1 min CN=89 Runoff=6.52 cfs 0.772 of Subcatchment DA4: Lot 2 Rooftop Runoff Area=18,152 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.75" Flow Length=40' Slope=0.0100 T Tc=0.9 min CN=98 Runoff=2.10 cfs 0.095 of Subcatchment DA5: Dumpster Area Runoff Area=6,644 sf 59.33% Impervious Runoff Depth>2.11" Flow Length=98' Tc=3.0 min CN=91 Runoff=0.63 cfs 0.027 of Reach RD: Roof Drain Avg. Depth=0.54' Max Vet=4.79 fps Inflow=2.10 cfs 0.095 of D=12.0" n=0.009 L=20.0' S=0.0050 T Capacity=3.64 cfs Outflow=2.08 cfs 0.095 of Reach SN03: S/N003 Pond 1P: DMH#10 Inflow=2.14 cfs 0.993 of Outflow=2.14 cfs 0.993 of Peak Elev=336.38' Inflow=2.08 cfs 0.095 of 12.0" x 80.0' Culvert Outflow=2.08 cfs 0.095 of Pond CB11: Catch Basin #11 Peak Elev=335.94' Inflow=9.62 cfs 0.447 of Primary=7.32 cfs 0.419 of Secondary=2.30 cfs 0.028 of Outflow=9.62 cfs 0.447 of Pond CB4: Catch Basin #4 Peak Elev=334.96' Inflow=0.63 cfs 0.027 of 12.0" x 70.0' Culvert Outflow=0.63 cfs 0.027 of Pond DMH8: Drain Manhole #8 Peak Elev=335.19' Inflow=2.65 cfs 0.122 of 12.0" x 57.0' Culvert Outflow=2.65 cfs 0.122 of Pond DMH9: Drain Manhole #9 Peak Elev=337.52' Inflow=6.52 cfs 0.772 of Primary=5.06 cfs 0.702 of Secondary=1.46 cfs 0.070 of Outflow=6.52 cfs 0.772 of Pond P1: Lot #1 Pond 3 Peak Elev=333.33' Storage=63,305 cf Inflow=12.05 cfs 2.354 of Outflow=2.14 cfs 0.993 of Pond W2: Lot 2 ED Wetland Peak Elev=335.31' Storage=14,535 cf Inflow=9.57 cfs 0.541 of Primary=3.02 cfs 0.526 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=3.02 cfs 0.526 of Pond W3: Lot 3 ED Wetland Peak Elev=337.64' Storage=21,456 cf Inflow=5.06 cfs 0.702 of Primary=1.66 cfs 0.616 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=1.66 cfs 0.616 of Total Runoff Area = 19.600 ac Runoff Volume = 2.454 of Average Runoff Depth = 1.50" 75.67% Pervious = 14.832 ac 24.33% Impervious = 4.769 ac Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 11 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Subcatchment DA1: Offsite Runoff = 8.36 cfs @ 12.56 hrs, Volume= 1.113 af, Depth> 1.14" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Area (sf) CN Descri 506,352 78 Meadow, non -grazed, HSG D 5,732 98 Impervious 512,084 78 Weighted Average 506,352 Pervious Area 5,732 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 18.9 100 0.0150 0.09 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 1.9 100 0.0150 0.86 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt2 Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 32.4 960 0.0170 0.49 0.66 Parabolic Channel, Tt3 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.035 Earth, dense weeds 53.2 1,160 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA2: Lot 2 Runoff = 9.62 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.447 af, Depth> 2.20" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Area (sf) CN Description 33,111 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 72,978 98 Impervious 106,089 92 Weighted Average 33,111 Pervious Area 72,978 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 3.7 44 0.1700 0.20 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.6 56 0.0450 1.44 Sheet Flow, Tt2 Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 0.4 100 0.0375 3.93 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt3 Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 0.7 80 0.0310 1.80 2.40 Parabolic Channel, Tt4 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.013 Asphalt, smooth Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 11 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 5.4 280 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA3: Lot 3 Runoff = 6.52 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 0.772 af, Depth> 1.91" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Area (sf) CN Description 103,905 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 106,915 98 Impervious 210,820 89 Weighted Average 103,905 Pervious Area 106,915 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 29.3 100 0.0050 0.06 Sheet Flow, Ttl Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 3.4 100 0.0050 0.49 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt2 Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 9.3 175 0.0050 0.31 0.42 Parabolic Channel, Tt3 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.030 Earth, grassed & winding 1.9 161 0.0200 1.44 1.92 Parabolic Channel, Tt4 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.013 Asphalt, smooth 1.2 328 0.0050 4.63 3.64 Circular Channel (pipe), TO Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r= 0.25' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 0.4 172 0.0100 6.55 5.15 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt6 Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r= 0.25' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 0.0 18 0.0270 10.77 8.46 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt7 Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r= 0.25' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 0.6 260 0.0090 7.21 8.85 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt8 Diam= 15.0" Area= 1.2 sf Perim= 3.9' r= 0.31' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 46.1 1,314 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA4: Lot 2 Rooftop Runoff = 2.10 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.095 af, Depth> 2.75" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type 11 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type/1 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Area (sf) CN Description 18,152 98 Impervious 18,152 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.9 40 0.0100 0.74 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" Summary for Subcatchment DA5: Dumpster Area Runoff = 0.63 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.027 af, Depth> 2.11" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Area (sf) CN Description 2,702 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D ' 3,942 98 Impervious 6,644 91 Weighted Average 2,702 Pervious Area 3,942 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.2 25 0.2000 0.19 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.8 73 0.0400 1.44 Sheet Flow, Tt2 Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 3.0 Inflow Area = Inflow = Outflow = 98 Total Summary for Reach RD: Roof Drain 0.417 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.75" for 10-Year event 2.10 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.095 of 2.08 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.095 af, Atten= 1 %, Lag= 0.1 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 4.79 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.1 min Avg. Velocity = 1.59 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.2 min Peak Storage= 9 cf @ 11.90 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.54' Bank -Full Depth= 1.00', Capacity at Bank -Full= 3.64 cfs 12.0" Diameter Pipe, n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Length= 20.0' Slope= 0.0050 7' Inlet Invert= 335.60', Outlet Invert= 335.50' Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type // 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Reach SN03: S/N003 Inflow Area = 19.600 ac, 24.33% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.61" for 10-Year event Inflow = 2.14 cfs @ 16.21 hrs, Volume= 0.993 of Outflow = 2.14 cfs @ 16.21 hrs, Volume= 0.993 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Summary for Pond 1 P: DMH#10 Inflow Area = 0.417 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.74" for 10-Year event Inflow = 2.08 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.095 of Outflow = 2.08 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.095 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 2.08 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.095 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 336.38' @ 11.90 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 335.40' 12.0" x 80.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.00' S= 0.0175 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=2.06 cfs @ 11.90 hrs HW=336.37' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 2.06 cfs @ 2.65 fps) Summary for Pond CB11: Catch Basin #11 Inflow Area = 2.435 ac, 68.79% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.20" for 10-Year event Inflow = 9.62 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.447 of Outflow = 9.62 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.447 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 7.32 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.419 of Secondary = 2.30 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.028 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 335.94' @ 11.96 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 334.00' 18.0" x 15.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 333.50' S= 0.0333 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Secondary 334.85' 12.0" x 165.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 333.05' S= 0.0109 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type/1 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Primary OutFlow Max=7.22 cfs @ 11.96 hrs HW=335.91' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 7.22 cfs @ 4.09 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=2.22 cfs @ 11.96 hrs HW=335.90' (Free Discharge) L2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 2.22 cfs @ 2.82 fps) Summary for Pond CB4: Catch Basin #4 Inflow Area = 0.153 ac, 59.33% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.11" for 10-Year event Inflow = 0.63 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.027 of Outflow = 0.63 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.027 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.63 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.027 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 334.96' @ 11.93 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 334.50' 12.0" x 70.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.00' S= 0.0071 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=0.60 cfs @ 11.93 hrs HW=334.94' (Free Discharge) 1-'-1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.60 cfs @ 1.79 fps) Summary for Pond DMH8: Drain Manhole #8 Inflow Area = 0.569 ac, 89.10% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.58" for 10-Year event Inflow = 2.65 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.122 of Outflow = 2.65 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.122 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 2.65 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.122 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 335.19' @ 11.90 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 333.90' 12.0" x 57.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 333.50' S= 0.0070 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=2.62 cfs @ 11.90 hrs HW=335.17' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 2.62 cfs @ 3.34 fps) Summary for Pond DMH9: Drain Manhole #9 Inflow Area = 4.840 ac, 50.71 % Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.91" for 10-Year event Inflow = 6.52 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 0.772 of Outflow = 6.52 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 0.772 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 5.06 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 0.702 of Secondary = 1.46 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 0.070 of Lots 20, POST 06 Type 1124-hr 10-Year Rainf611=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 337.52' @ 12.44 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 336.07' 18.0" x 20.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 336.00' S= 0.0035 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Secondary 336.77' 12.0" x 320.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.80' S= 0.0062 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=5.05 cfs @ 12.44 hrs HW=337.52' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 5.05 cfs @ 3.69 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=1.46 cfs @ 12.44 hrs HW=337.52' (Free Discharge) L2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 1.46 cfs @ 2.32 fps) Summary for Pond P1: Lot #1 Pond 3 Inflow Area = 19.600 ac, 24.33% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.44" for 10-Year event Inflow = 12.05 cfs @ 12.51 hrs, Volume= 2.354 of Outflow = 2.14 cfs @ 16.21 hrs, Volume= 0.993 af, Atten= 82%, Lag= 222.2 min Primary = 2.14 cfs @ 16.21 hrs, Volume= 0.993 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 333.33' @ 16.21 hrs Surf.Area= 60,438 sf Storage= 63,305 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 268.3 min calculated for 0.993 of (42% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 151.5 min ( 1,005.6 - 854.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 330.50' 113,145 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 330.50 100 0 0 331.00 2,240 585 585 332.00 20,400 11,320 11,905 333.00 47,200 33,800 45,705 334.00 87,680 67,440 113,145 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 330.58' 21.0" x 130.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.600 Outlet Invert= 330.01' S= 0.0044 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean #2 Device 1 330.58' 1.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 333.00' 4.0' long x 0.7' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 Coef. (English) 2.76 2.82 2.93 3.09 3.18 3.22 3.27 3.30 3.32 3.31 3.32 Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 11 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Primary OutFlow Max=2.14 cfs @ 16.21 hrs HW=333.33' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Passes 2.14 cfs of 12.85 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifi ce/G rate (Orifice Controls 0.04 cfs @ 7.92 fps) 3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 2.09 cfs @ 1.60 fps) Summary for Pond W2: Lot 2 ED Wetland Inflow Area = 3.005 ac, 72.64% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 2.16" for 10-Year event Inflow = 9.57 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.541 of Outflow = 3.02 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.526 af, Atten= 68%, Lag= 9.9 min Primary = 3.02 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.526 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Starting Elev= 333.50' Surf.Area= 3,388 sf Storage= 4,808 cf Peak Elev= 335.31' @ 12.10 hrs Surf.Area= 7,487 sf Storage= 14,535 cf (9,727 cf above start) Plug -Flow detention time= 192.3 min calculated for 0.416 of (77% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 83.4 min ( 839.4 - 756.0 ) Volume Invert Avail.Stora e Storage Description #1 329.50' 20,146 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 329.50 35 0 0 330.00 146 45 45 331.00 583 365 410 332.00 1,379 981 1,391 333.00 2,508 1,944 3,334 334.00 4,268 3,388 6,722 335.00 6,857 5,563 12,285 336.00 8,865 7,861 20,146 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 333.25' 12.0" x 25.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.600 Outlet Invert= 333.15' S= 0.0040 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Device 1 333.50' 3.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate X 3.00 C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 335.00' 13.9" Horiz. Orifice/Grate Limited to weir flow C= 0.600 #4 Secondary 335.50' 10.0' long x 4.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.38 2.54 2.69 2.68 2.67 2.67 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.68 2.72 2.73 2.76 2.79 2.88 3.07 3.32 Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 11 24-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Primary OutFlow Max=3.00 cfs @ 12.10 hrs HW=335.31' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Passes 3.00 cfs of 4.43 cfs potential flow) N =Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.92 cfs @ 6.25 fps) =Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 2.08 cfs @ 1.83 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=333.50' (Free Discharge) L4=113road-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond W3: Lot 3 ED Wetland Inflow Area = 4.840 ac, 50.71 % Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.74" for 10-Year event Inflow = 5.06 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 0.702 of Outflow = 1.66 cfs @ 13.30 hrs, Volume= 0.616 af, Atten= 67%, Lag= 51.8 min Primary = 1.66 cfs @ 13.30 hrs, Volume= 0.616 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Starting Elev= 335.50' Surf.Area= 4,624 sf Storage= 7,613 cf Peak Elev= 337.64' @ 13.30 hrs Surf.Area= 8,260 sf Storage= 21,456 cf (13,843 cf above start) Plug -Flow detention time= 251.0 min calculated for 0.442 of (63% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 111.6 min ( 918.8 - 807.2 ) Volume Invert Avail.Stora e Storage Description #1 331.50' 24,513 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 331.50 112 0 0 332.00 447 140 140 333.00 1,064 756 895 334.00 2,226 1,645 2,540 335.00 3,738 2,982 5,522 336.00 5,509 4,624 10,146 338.00 8,858 14,367 24,513 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 335.35' 12.0" x 115.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.80' S= 0.0048 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Device 1 335.50' 3.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate X 3.00 C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 337.50' 13.9" Horiz. Orifice/Grate Limited to weir flow C= 0.600 #4 Secondary 338.00' 10.0' long x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 1124-hr 10-Year Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Primary OutFlow Max=1.65 cfs @ 13.30 hrs HW=337.64' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Passes 1.65 cfs of 4.00 cfs potential flow) T:3=Orifi 2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 1.01 cfs @ 6.84 fps) ce/Grate (Weir Controls 0.64 cfs @ 1.24 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=335.50' (Free Discharge) Z4=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) EXHIBIT 5: POST -DEVELOPMENT HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS FOR 1-YEAR, 24-HOUR STORM EVENT J SN03 S/ 7 3 Offsite of #nd (DA5> `� / ea cB � ' � 3 Dumpster Area CB4 2 � 1 1 Catch Basin Lot 2 ED W land I Lot 3 Wetland I � DMHB 1 � 1 � Dr anhole #8 1 P \--- Lot 2 Rooftop Roof Drain DMH#10 Subcat Reach on Link CB CB C611 MH9 Catch in #11 Drain M Whole #9 ( DA2I ( DA 3 Lot 2 Lot 3 Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type/1 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment DA1: Offsite Runoff Area=512,084 sf 1.12% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.47" Flow Length=1,160' Tc=53.2 min CN=78 Runoff=3.17 cfs 0.461 of Subcatchment DA2: Lot 2 Runoff Area=106,089 sf 68.79% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.23" Flow Length=280' Tc=5.4 min CN=92 Runoff=5.59 cfs 0.251 of Subcatchment DA3: Lot 3 Runoff Area=210,820 sf 50.71% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.01" Flow Length=1,314' Tc=46.1 min CN=89 Runoff=3.46 cfs 0.408 of Subcatchment DA4: Lot 2 Rooftop Runoff Area=18,152 sf 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.75" Flow Length=40' Slope=0.0100 '/' Tc=0.9 min CN=98 Runoff=1.36 cfs 0.061 of Subcatchment DA5: Dumpster Area Runoff Area=6,644 sf 59.33% Impervious Runoff Depth>1.16" Flow Length=98' Tc=3.0 min CN=91 Runoff=0.36 cfs 0.015 of Reach RD: Roof Drain Avg. Depth=0.42' Max Vet=4.29 fps Inflow=1.36 cfs 0.061 of D=12.0" n=0.009 L=20.0' S=0.0050 '/' Capacity=3.64 cfs Outflow=1.34 cfs 0.061 of Reach SN03: S/N003 Pond 1 P: DMH#10 Inflow=0.22 cfs 0.040 of Outflow=0.22 cfs 0.040 of Peak Elev=336.11' Inflow=1.34 cfs 0.061 of 12.0" x 80.0' Culvert Outflow=1.34 cfs 0.061 of Pond CB11: Catch Basin #11 Peak EIev=335.30' Inflow=5.59 cfs 0.251 of Primary=4.98 cfs 0.245 of Secondary=0.61 cfs 0.006 of Outflow=5.59 cfs 0.251 of Pond CB4: Catch Basin #4 Peak EIev=334.84' Inflow=0.36 cfs 0.015 of 12.0" x 70.0' Culvert Outflow=0.36 cfs 0.015 of Pond DMH8: Drain Manhole #8 Peak EIev=334.72' Inflow=1.67 cfs 0.075 of 12.0" x 57.0' Culvert Outflow=1.67 cfs 0.075 of Pond DMH9: Drain Manhole #9 Peak EIev=337.13' Inflow=3.46 cfs 0.408 of Primary=3.06 cfs 0.393 of Secondary=0.40 cfs 0.014 of Outflow=3.46 cfs 0.408 of Pond P1: Lot #1 Pond 3 Peak EIev=333.06' Storage=48,723 cf Inflow=4.90 cfs 1.160 of Outflow=0.22 cfs 0.040 of Pond W2: Lot 2 ED Wetland Peak EIev=334.84' Storage=11,213 cf Inflow=6.36 cfs 0.320 of Primary=0.78 cfs 0.311 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.78 cfs 0.311 of Pond W& Lot 3 ED Wetland Peak EIev=336.84' Storage=15,367 cf Inflow=3.06 cfs 0.393 of Primary=0.78 cfs 0.368 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.78 cfs 0.368 of Total Runoff Area = 19.600 ac Runoff Volume = 1.195 of Average Runoff Depth = 0.73" 75.67% Pervious = 14.832 ac 24.33% Impervious = 4.769 ac Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 11 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2. 10 " Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Subcatchment DA1: Offsite Runoff = 3.17 cfs @ 12.60 hrs, Volume= 0.461 af, Depth> 0.47" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Area (sf) CN Descriotion 506,352 78 Meadow, non -grazed, HSG D 5,732 98 Impervious 512,084 78 Weighted Average 506,352 Pervious Area 5,732 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 18.9 100 0.0150 0.09 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 1.9 100 0.0150 0.86 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt2 Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 32.4 960 0.0170 0.49 0.66 Parabolic Channel, Tt3 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.035 Earth, dense weeds 53.2 1,160 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA2: Lot 2 Runoff = 5.59 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.251 af, Depth> 1.23" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Area (sf) CN Descriotion 33,111 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 72,978 98 Impervious 106,089 92 Weighted Average 33,111 Pervious Area 72,978 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 3.7 44 0.1700 0.20 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.6 56 0.0450 1.44 Sheet Flow, Tt2 Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 0.4 100 0.0375 3.93 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt3 Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 0.7 80 0.0310 1.80 2.40 Parabolic Channel, Tt4 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.013 Asphalt, smooth Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 11 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 5.4 280 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA3: Lot 3 Runoff = 3.46 cfs @ 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.408 af, Depth> 1.01" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Area (sf) CN Description 103,905 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 106,915 98 Impervious 210,820 89 Weighted Average 103,905 Pervious Area 106,915 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 29.3 100 0.0050 0.06 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 3.4 100 0.0050 0.49 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt2 Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 9.3 175 0.0050 0.31 0.42 Parabolic Channel, Tt3 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.030 Earth, grassed & winding 1.9 161 0.0200 1.44 1.92 Parabolic Channel, Tt4 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.013 Asphalt, smooth 1.2 328 0.0050 4.63 3.64 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt5 Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r= 0.25' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 0.4 172 0.0100 6.55 5.15 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt6 Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r= 0.25' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 0.0 18 0.0270 10.77 8.46 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt7 Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r= 0.25' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 0.6 260 0.0090 7.21 8.85 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt8 Diam= 15.0" Area= 1.2 sf Perim= 3.9' r= 0.31' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 46.1 1,314 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA4: Lot 2 Rooftop Runoff = 1.36 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.061 af, Depth> 1.75" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type 11 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 11 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Area (sf) CN Description 18,152 98 Impervious 18,152 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.9 40 0.0100 0.74 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" Summary for Subcatchment DA5: Dumpster Area Runoff = 0.36 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.015 af, Depth> 1.16" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Area (sf) CN Description 2,702 80 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D 3,942 98 Impervious 6,644 91 Weighted Average 2,702 Pervious Area 3,942 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.2 25 0.2000 0.19 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.8 73 0.0400 1.44 Sheet Flow, Tt2 Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 3.0 98 Total Summary for Reach RD: Roof Drain Inflow Area = 0.417 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.75" for 1-Year event Inflow = 1.36 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.061 of Outflow = 1.34 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.061 af, Atten= 1 %, Lag= 0.1 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 4.29 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.1 min Avg. Velocity = 1.38 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.2 min Peak Storage= 6 cf @ 11.90 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.42' Bank -Full Depth= 1.00', Capacity at Bank -Full= 3.64 cfs 12.0" Diameter Pipe, n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Length= 20.0' Slope= 0.0050 7' Inlet Invert= 335.60', Outlet Invert= 335.50' Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 11 24-hr 1-Year Rainfal1=2.10" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Reach SN03: S/N003 Inflow Area = 19.600 ac, 24.33% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.02" for 1-Year event Inflow = 0.22 cfs @ 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.040 of Outflow = 0.22 cfs @ 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.040 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Summary for Pond 1 P: DMH#10 Inflow Area = 0.417 ac,100.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.75" for 1-Year event Inflow = 1.34 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.061 of Outflow = 1.34 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.061 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 1.34 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.061 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 336.11' @ 11.90 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 335.40' 12.0" x 80.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.00' S= 0.0175 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=1.33 cfs @ 11.90 hrs HW=336.10' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 1.33 cfs @ 2.25 fps) Summary for Pond CB11: Catch Basin #11 Inflow Area = 2.435 ac, 68.79% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.23" for 1-Year event Inflow = 5.59 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.251 of Outflow = 5.59 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.251 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 4.98 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.245 of Secondary = 0.61 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.006 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 335.30' @ 11.96 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 334.00' 18.0" x 15.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 333.50' S= 0.0333 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Secondary 334.85' 12.0" x 165.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 333.05' S= 0.0109 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type // 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Primary OutFlow Max=4.89 cfs @ 11.96 hrs HW=335.28' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 4.89 cfs @ 3.04 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.57 cfs @ 11.96 hrs HW=335.28' (Free Discharge) L2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.57 cfs @ 1.77 fps) Summary for Pond CB4: Catch Basin #4 Inflow Area = 0.153 ac, 59.33% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.16" for 1-Year event Inflow = 0.36 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.015 of Outflow = 0.36 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.015 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.36 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.015 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 334.84' @ 11.93 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 334.50' 12.0" x 70.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.00' S= 0.0071 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=0.34 cfs @ 11.94 hrs HW=334.83' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.34 cfs @ 1.54 fps) Summary for Pond DMH8: Drain Manhole #8 Inflow Area = 0.569 ac, 89.10% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.59" for 1-Year event Inflow = 1.67 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.075 of Outflow = 1.67 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.075 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 1.67 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.075 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 334.72' @ 11.90 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 333.90' 12.0" x 57.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 333.50' S= 0.0070 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=1.65 cfs @ 11.90 hrs HW=334.71' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 1.65 cfs @ 2.42 fps) Summary for Pond DMH9: Drain Manhole #9 Inflow Area = 4.840 ac, 50.71% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.01" for 1-Year event Inflow = 3.46 cfs @ 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.408 of Outflow = 3.46 cfs @ 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.408 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 3.06 cfs @ 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.393 of Secondary = 0.40 cfs @ 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.014 of Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 11 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2. 10 " Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 337.13' @ 12.45 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 336.07' 18.0" x 20.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 336.00' S= 0.0035 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Secondary 336.77' 12.0" x 320.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.80' S= 0.0062 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=3.06 cfs @ 12.45 hrs HW=337.13' (Free Discharge) 't-1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 3.06 cfs @ 3.23 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.40 cfs @ 12.45 hrs HW=337.13' (Free Discharge) L2=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.40 cfs @ 1.61 fps) Summary for Pond P1: Lot #1 Pond 3 Inflow Area = 19.600 ac, 24.33% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.71" for 1-Year event Inflow = 4.90 cfs @ 12.58 hrs, Volume= 1.160 of Outflow = 0.22 cfs @ 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.040 af, Atten= 96%, Lag= 445.2 min Primary = 0.22 cfs @ 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.040 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 333.06' @ 20.00 hrs Surf.Area= 49,721 sf Storage= 48,723 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 342.9 min calculated for 0.040 of (3% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 128.0 min ( 1,000.4 - 872.3 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 330.50' 113,145 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 330.50 100 0 0 331.00 2,240 585 585 332.00 20,400 11,320 11,905 333.00 47,200 33,800 45,705 334.00 87,680 67,440 113,145 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 330.58' 21.0" x 130.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.600 Outlet Invert= 330.01' S= 0.0044 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean #2 Device 1 330.58' 1.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 333.00' 4.0' long x 0.7' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 Coef. (English) 2.76 2.82 2.93 3.09 3.18 3.22 3.27 3.30 3.32 3.31 3.32 Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type // 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Primary OutFlow Max=0.21 cfs @ 20.00 hrs HW=333.06' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Passes 0.21 cfs of 11.71 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.04 cfs @ 7.52 fps) 3=13road-Crested Rectangular Weir (Weir Controls 0.17 cfs @ 0.69 fps) Summary for Pond W2: Lot 2 ED Wetland Inflow Area = 3.005 ac, 72.64% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 1.28" for 1-Year event Inflow = 6.36 cfs @ 11.94 hrs, Volume= 0.320 of Outflow = 0.78 cfs @ 12.33 hrs, Volume= 0.311 af, Atten= 88%, Lag= 23.0 min Primary = 0.78 cfs @ 12.33 hrs, Volume= 0.311 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Starting Elev= 333.50' Surf.Area= 3,388 sf Storage= 4,808 cf Peak Elev= 334.84' @ 12.33 hrs Surf.Area= 6,440 sf Storage= 11,213 cf (6,405 cf above start) Plug -Flow detention time= 230.5 min calculated for 0.200 of (62% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 85.0 min ( 851.1 - 766.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 329.50' 20,146 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 329.50 35 0 0 330.00 146 45 45 331.00 583 365 410 332.00 1,379 981 1,391 333.00 2,508 1,944 3,334 334.00 4,268 3,388 6,722 335.00 6,857 5,563 12,285 336.00 8,865 7,861 20,146 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 333.25' 12.0" x 25.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.600 Outlet Invert= 333.15' S= 0.0040 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Device 1 333.50' 3.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate X 3.00 C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 335.00' 13.9" Horiz. Orifice/Grate Limited to weir flow C= 0.600 #4 Secondary 335.50' 10.0' long x 4.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.38 2.54 2.69 2.68 2.67 2.67 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.68 2.72 2.73 2.76 2.79 2.88 3.07 3.32 Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 11 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 Primary OutFlow Max=0.78 cfs @ 12.33 hrs HW=334.84' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Passes 0.78 cfs of 3.70 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.78 cfs @ 5.30 fps) 3=Orifice/G rate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=333.50' (Free Discharge) t-4=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond W3: Lot 3 ED Wetland Inflow Area = 4.840 ac, 50.71% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.97" for 1-Year event Inflow = 3.06 cfs @ 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.393 of Outflow = 0.78 cfs @ 13.44 hrs, Volume= 0.368 af, Atten= 74%, Lag= 59.7 min Primary = 0.78 cfs @ 13.44 hrs, Volume= 0.368 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Starting Elev= 335.50' Surf.Area= 4,624 sf Storage= 7,613 cf Peak Elev= 336.84' @ 13.44 hrs Surf.Area= 6,916 sf Storage= 15,367 cf (7,754 cf above start) Plug -Flow detention time= 287.1 min calculated for 0.193 of (49% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 103.9 min ( 922.0 - 818.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 331.50' 24,513 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 331.50 112 0 0 332.00 447 140 140 333.00 1,064 756 895 334.00 2,226 1,645 2,540 335.00 3,738 2,982 5,522 336.00 5,509 4,624 10,146 338.00 8,858 14,367 24,513 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 335.35' 12.0" x 115.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.80' S= 0.0048 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Device 1 335.50' 3.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate X 3.00 C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 337.50' 13.9" Horiz. Orifice/Grate Limited to weir flow C= 0.600 #4 Secondary 338.00' 10.0' long x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 Lots 2&3, POST 06 Type 11 24-hr 1-Year Rainfall=2. 10 " Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 11 Primary OutFlow Max=0.78 cfs @ 13.44 hrs HW=336.84' (Free Discharge) t-1=Culvert (Passes 0.78 cfs of 2.97 cfs potential flow) L2=0rifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.78 cfs @ 5.31 fps) 3=Orifice/G rate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=335.50' (Free Discharge) t 4=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) EXHIBIT 6: POST -DEVELOPMENT HYDROLOGIC CALCULATIONS FOR A 0.9" STORM EVENT WITH EXACT MODIFIED CURVE NUMBERS i J F N03 S/ 7 3 DA1 v P1 O Offsite of #6A �DA)5 Dumpster Area I 1 I � Catch Basin #4 Lot 2 ED W land I Lot 3 Wetland 1 CB MH8 I � I 1 Dr Manhole #8 ce ce CB11 MH9 CB RFD-0 1 P Catch in #11 Drain Whole #9 Lot 2 Rooftop Roof Drain DMH#10 ODA2 (DA3 ) Lot 2 Lot 3 Subcat Reach on Link Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment DA1: Offsite Runoff Area=512,084 sf 1.12% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.03" Flow Length=1,160' Tc=53.2 min CN=78 Runoff=0.06 cfs 0.025 of Subcatchment DA2: Lot 2 Runoff Area=106,089 sf 30.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.57" Flow Length=280' Tc=5.4 min CN=97 Runoff=2.55 cfs 0.116 of Subcatchment DA3: Lot 3 Runoff Area=210,820 sf 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.43" Flow Length=1,314' Tc=46.1 min CN=95 Runoff=1.49 cfs 0.175 of Subcatchment DA4: Lot 2 Rooftop Runoff Area=18,151 sf 30.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.57" Flow Length=40' Slope=0.0100 7' Tc=0.9 min CN=97 Runoff=0.49 cfs 0.020 of Subcatchment DA5: Dumpster Area Runoff Area=6,644 sf 30.00% Impervious Runoff Depth>0.57" Flow Length=98' Tc=3.0 min CN=97 Runoff=0.17 cfs 0.007 of Reach RD: Roof Drain Avg. Depth=0.25' Max Vet=3.23 fps Inflow=0.49 cfs 0.020 of D=12.0" n=0.009 L=20.0' S=0.0050 T Capacity=3.64 cfs Outflow=0.48 cfs 0.020 of Reach SN03: S/N003 Pond 1 P: DMH#10 Inflow=0.03 cfs 0.021 of Outflow=0.03 cfs 0.021 of Peak Elev=335.79' Inflow=0.48 cfs 0.020 of 12.0" x 80.0' Culvert Outflow=0.48 cfs 0.020 of Pond CB11: Catch Basin #11 Peak Elev=334.85' Inflow=2.55 cfs 0.116 of Primary=2.55 cfs 0.116 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=2.55 cfs 0.116 of Pond CB4: Catch Basin #4 Peak Elev=334.73' Inflow=0.17 cfs 0.007 of 12.0" x 70.0' Culvert Outflow=0.17 cfs 0.007 of Pond DMH8: Drain Manhole #8 Peak Elev=334.36' Inflow=0.64 cfs 0.027 of 12.0" x 57.0' Culvert Outflow=0.64 cfs 0.027 of Pond DMH9: Drain Manhole #9 Peak Elev=336.77' Inflow=1.49 cfs 0.175 of Primary=1.49 cfs 0.175 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=1.49 cfs 0.175 of Pond P1: Lot #1 Pond 3 Peak EIev=332.06' Storage=13,284 cf Inflow=0.99 cfs 0.326 of Outflow=0.03 cfs 0.021 of Pond W2: Lot 2 ED Wetland Peak EIev=334.19' Storage=7,584 cf Inflow=3.09 cfs 0.143 of Primary=0.53 cfs 0.137 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.53 cfs 0.137 of Pond W3: Lot 3 ED Wetland Peak EIev=336.11' Storage=10,759 cf Inflow=1.49 cfs 0.175 of Primary=0.49 cfs 0.164 of Secondary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.49 cfs 0.164 of Total Runoff Area = 19.600 ac Runoff Volume = 0.344 of Average Runoff Depth = 0.21" 94.73% Pervious = 18.567 ac 5.27% Impervious = 1.033 ac Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type 11 24-hr WQv Rainfal1=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Subcatchment DA1: Offsite Runoff = 0.06 cfs @ 13.40 hrs, Volume= 0.025 af, Depth> 0.03" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Area (sf) CN Description 506,352 78 Meadow, non -grazed, HSG D 5,732 98 Impervious 512,084 78 Weighted Average 506,352 Pervious Area 5,732 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 18.9 100 0.0150 0.09 Sheet Flow, Ttl Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 1.9 100 0.0150 0.86 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt2 Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 32.4 960 0.0170 0.49 0.66 Parabolic Channel, Tt3 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.035 Earth. dense weeds 53.2 1,160 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA2: Lot 2 Runoff = 2.55 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.116 af, Depth> 0.57" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Area (sf) CN Description 74,262 97 MOD 31,827 98 MOD 106,089 97 Weighted Average 74,262 Pervious Area 31,827 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 3.7 44 0.1700 0.20 Sheet Flow, TO Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.6 56 0.0450 1.44 Sheet Flow, Tt2 Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 0.4 100 0.0375 3.93 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt3 Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 0.7 80 0.0310 1.80 2.40 Parabolic Channel, Tt4 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.013 Asphalt, smooth Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCADO 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 5.4 280 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA3: Lot 3 Runoff = 1.49 cfs @ 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.175 af, Depth> 0.43" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Area (sf) CN Description 84,328 94 MOD 126,492 95 MOD 210,820 95 Weighted Average 210,820 Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 29.3 100 0.0050 0.06 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 3.4 100 0.0050 0.49 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Tt2 Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 9.3 175 0.0050 0.31 0.42 Parabolic Channel, Tt3 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.030 Earth, grassed & winding 1.9 161 0.0200 1.44 1.92 Parabolic Channel, Tt4 W=50.00' D=0.04' Area=1.3 sf Perim=50.0' n= 0.013 Asphalt, smooth 1.2 328 0.0050 4.63 3.64 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt5 Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r= 0.25' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 0.4 172 0.0100 6.55 5.15 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt6 Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r= 0.25' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 0.0 18 0.0270 10.77 8.46 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt7 Diam= 12.0" Area= 0.8 sf Perim= 3.1' r= 0.25' n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior 0.6 260 0.0090 7.21 8.85 Circular Channel (pipe), Tt8 Diam= 15.0" Area= 1.2 sf Perim= 3.9' r= 0.31' n= 0.009 PVC. smooth interior 46.1 1,314 Total Summary for Subcatchment DA4: Lot 2 Rooftop Runoff = 0.49 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.020 af, Depth> 0.57" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type 11 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Area (sf) CN Descri 12,706 97 MOD 5,445 98 MOD 18,151 97 Weighted Average 12,706 Pervious Area 5,445 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 0.9 40 0.0100 0.74 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" Summary for Subcatchment DA5: Dumpster Area Runoff = 0.17 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af, Depth> 0.57" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type II 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Area (sf) CN Description 4,651 97 MOD 1,993 98 MOD 6,644 97 Weighted Average 4,651 Pervious Area 1,993 Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 2.2 25 0.2000 0.19 Sheet Flow, Tt1 Grass: Dense n= 0.240 P2= 2.30" 0.8 73 0.0400 1.44 Sheet Flow, Tt2 Smooth surfaces n= 0.011 P2= 2.30" 3.0 98 Total Summary for Reach RD: Roof Drain Inflow Area = 0.417 ac, 30.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.57" for WQv event Inflow = 0.49 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.020 of Outflow = 0.48 cfs @ 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.020 af, Atten= 1 %, Lag= 0.1 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Max. Velocity= 3.23 fps, Min. Travel Time= 0.1 min Avg. Velocity = 0.95 fps, Avg. Travel Time= 0.4 min Peak Storage= 3 cf @ 11.90 hrs, Average Depth at Peak Storage= 0.25' Bank -Full Depth= 1.00', Capacity at Bank -Full= 3.64 cfs Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 12.0" Diameter Pipe, n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Length= 20.0' Slope= 0.0050 7' Inlet Invert= 335.60', Outlet Invert= 335.50' Summary for Reach SN03: S/N003 Inflow Area = 19.600 ac, 5.27% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.01" for WQv event Inflow = 0.03 cfs @ 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.021 of Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.021 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Inflow Area = 0.417 ac, Inflow = 0.48 cfs @ Outflow = 0.48 cfs @ Primary = 0.48 cfs @ Summary for Pond 1 P: DMH#10 30.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.57" 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.020 of 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.020 af, 11.90 hrs, Volume= 0.020 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 335.79' @ 11.90 hrs Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices for WQv event Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min #1 Primary 335.40' 12.0" x 80.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.00' S= 0.0175 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=0.48 cfs @ 11.90 hrs HW=335.79' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.48 cfs @ 1.68 fps) Summary for Pond CB11: Catch Basin #11 Inflow Area = 2.435 ac, Inflow = 2.55 cfs @ Outflow = 2.55 cfs @ Primary = 2.55 cfs @ Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 30.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.57" 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.116 of 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.116 af, 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.116 of 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 334.85' @ 11.96 hrs for WQv event Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 334.00' 18.0" x 15.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 333.50' S= 0.0333 T Cc= 0.900 Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 © 2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Secondary 334.85' 12.0" x 165.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 333.05' S= 0.0109 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=2.49 cfs @ 11.96 hrs HW=334.84' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 2.49 cfs @ 2.46 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=334.00' (Free Discharge) L2=Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond CB4: Catch Basin #4 Inflow Area = 0.153 ac, 30.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.57" for WQv event Inflow = 0.17 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.007 of Outflow = 0.17 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.007 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.17 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, Volume= 0.007 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 334.73' @ 11.93 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 334.50' 12.0" x 70.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.00' S= 0.0071 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=0.16 cfs @ 11.93 hrs, HW=334.72' (Free Discharge) t-1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.16 cfs @ 1.27 fps) Summary for Pond DMH8: Drain Manhole #8 Inflow Area = 0.569 ac, 30.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.57" for WQv event Inflow = 0.64 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.027 of Outflow = 0.64 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.027 af, Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary = 0.64 cfs @ 11.91 hrs, Volume= 0.027 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 334.36' @ 11.91 hrs Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 333.90' 12.0" x 57.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 333.50' S= 0.0070 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=0.63 cfs @ 11.91 hrs HW=334.35' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Inlet Controls 0.63 cfs @ 1.81 fps) Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 8 Summary for Pond DMH9: Drain Manhole #9 Inflow Area = 4.840 ac, Inflow = 1.49 cfs @ Outflow = 1.49 cfs @ Primary = 1.49 cfs @ Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.43" 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.175 of 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.175 A 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.175 of 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 336.77' @ 12.45 hrs for WQv event Atten= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 336.07' 18.0" x 20.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 336.00' S= 0.0035 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Secondary 336.77' 12.0" x 320.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.80' S= 0.0062 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior Primary OutFlow Max=1.49 cfs @ 12.45 hrs HW=336.77' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Barrel Controls 1.49 cfs @ 2.71 fps) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=336.07' (Free Discharge) L2=Culvert ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Inflow Area = 19.600 ac, Inflow = 0.99 cfs @ Outflow = 0.03 cfs @ Primary = 0.03 cfs @ Summary for Pond P1: Lot #1 Pond 3 5.27% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.20" 12.93 hrs, Volume= 0.326 of 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.021 af, 20.00 hrs, Volume= 0.021 of for WQv event Atten= 97%, Lag= 424.4 min Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Peak Elev= 332.06' @ 20.00 hrs Surf.Area= 22,138 sf Storage= 13,284 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 265.7 min calculated for 0.021 of (6% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 80.7 min ( 946.3 - 865.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 330.50' 113,145 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 330.50 100 0 0 331.00 2,240 585 585 332.00 20,400 11,320 11,905 333.00 47,200 33,800 45,705 334.00 87,680 67,440 113,145 Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 9 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 330.58' 21.0" x 130.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.600 Outlet Invert= 330.01' S= 0.0044'/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Concrete pipe, straight & clean #2 Device 1 330.58' 1.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 333.00' 4.0' long x 0.7' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 Coef. (English) 2.76 2.82 2.93 3.09 3.18 3.22 3.27 3.30 3.32 3.31 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=0.03 cfs @ 20.00 hrs HW=332.06' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Passes 0.03 cfs of 7.01 cfs potential flow) L2=Orifi ce/G rate (Orifice Controls 0.03 cfs @ 5.78 fps) 3=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond W2: Lot 2 ED Wetland Inflow Area = 3.005 ac, 30.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.57" for WQv event Inflow = 3.09 cfs @ 11.95 hrs, Volume= 0.143 of Outflow = 0.53 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.137 af, Atten= 83%, Lag= 12.3 min Primary = 0.53 cfs @ 12.15 hrs, Volume= 0.137 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Starting Elev= 333.50' Surf.Area= 3,388 sf Storage= 4,808 cf Peak Elev= 334.19' @ 12.15 hrs Surf.Area= 4,762 sf Storage= 7,584 cf (2,776 cf above start) Plug -Flow detention time= 386.9 min calculated for 0.027 of (19% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 59.7 min ( 825.3 - 765.6 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 329.50' 20,146 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 329.50 35 0 0 330.00 146 45 45 331.00 583 365 410 332.00 1,379 981 1,391 333.00 2,508 1,944 3,334 334.00 4,268 3,388 6,722 335.00 6,857 5,563 12,285 336.00 8,865 7,861 20,146 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 333.25' 12.0" x 25.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.600 Outlet Invert= 333.15' S= 0.0040 7' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Device 1 333.50' 3.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate X 3.00 C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 335.00' 13.9" Horiz. Orifice/Grate Limited to weir flow C= 0.600 Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 10 #4 Secondary 335.50' 10.0' long x 4.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 Coef. (English) 2.38 2.54 2.69 2.68 2.67 2.67 2.65 2.66 2.66 2.68 2.72 2.73 2.76 2.79 2.88 3.07 3.32 Primary OutFlow Max=0.53 cfs @ 12.15 hrs HW=334.19' (Free Discharge) L-1=Culvert (Passes 0.53 cfs of 2.00 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.53 cfs @ 3.62 fps) L3=Orifi ce/G rate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=333.50' (Free Discharge) L4=Broad-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Summary for Pond W3: Lot 3 ED Wetland Inflow Area = 4.840 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth > 0.43" for WQv event Inflow = 1.49 cfs @ 12.45 hrs, Volume= 0.175 of Outflow = 0.49 cfs @ 13.17 hrs, Volume= 0.164 af, Atten= 67%, Lag= 43.2 min Primary = 0.49 cfs @ 13.17 hrs, Volume= 0.164 of Secondary = 0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs, Volume= 0.000 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Starting Elev= 335.50' Surf.Area= 4,624 sf Storage= 7,613 cf Peak Elev= 336.11' @ 13.17 hrs Surf.Area= 5,692 sf Storage= 10,759 cf (3,147 cf above start) Plug -Flow detention time= (not calculated: initial storage excedes outflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 70.8 min ( 886.3 - 815.5 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 331.50' 24,513 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 331.50 112 0 0 332.00 447 140 140 333.00 1,064 756 895 334.00 2,226 1,645 2,540 335.00 3,738 2,982 5,522 336.00 5,509 4,624 10,146 338.00 8,858 14,367 24,513 Device Routinq Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 335.35' 12.0" x 115.0' long Culvert Ke= 0.900 Outlet Invert= 334.80' S= 0.0048 T Cc= 0.900 n= 0.009 PVC, smooth interior #2 Device 1 335.50' 3.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate X 3.00 C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 337.50' 13.9" Horiz. Orifice/Grate Limited to weir flow C= 0.600 #4 Secondary 338.00' 10.0' long x 10.0' breadth Broad -Crested Rectangular Weir Head (feet) 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 Coef. (English) 2.49 2.56 2.70 2.69 2.68 2.69 2.67 2.64 Lots 2&3, POST 06 MOD Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) Printed 10/2/2007 HydroCAD® 8.50 s/n 002428 ©2007 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paqe 11 Primary OutFlow Max=0.49 cfs @ 13.17 hrs HW=336.11' (Free Discharge) t-1=Culvert (Passes 0.49 cfs of 1.50 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.49 cfs @ 3.35 fps) L3=Orifi ce/G rate ( Controls 0.00 cfs) Secondary OutFlow Max=0.00 cfs @ 5.00 hrs HW=335.50' (Free Discharge) t-4=13road-Crested Rectangular Weir ( Controls 0.00 cfs) EXHIBIT 7: PROJECT PLANS & DETAILS SOUTH i -ZLINGTON DEVELOPMENT RE, 1W BOARD Minutes SEPTEMBER 4, 2007 V Ek Mr. Matosky noted the owners of the area are very proud of the landscaping. Rather than standard street trees they would like to do something similar to lot 7 where landscaping is part of the landscaping plan for the lot. Mr. Belair noted the applicant agreed to plant street trees in the original approval. Mr. Behr said he liked what was done on Lot #7 and would want certainty that it would continue. Sketch Plan Application #SD-07-52 of Technology Park Partners for a planned it development to construct a 54,459 sq. ft. general office building on a lot currently developed with a 275,000 sq. ft. mixed use building, 30 Community Drive: Mr. Belair noted this is being applied for as a PUD because there is no lot there now. Mr. Matosky said they are still proposing a lot with coverages, and if it makes more sense to apply for a 2-lot subdivision, they will. Mr. Hall said that if the overall subdivision goes through, there is no issue. Ms. LaRose said there is a question as to whether the new footprint will require a new CUD. Mr. Matosky said he will check on that. The impacted area is identical or less. Mr. Belair said the Board may have concern with the impact on the Class 2 wetland buffer. He added that obtaining a CUD from the State is not an automatic approval from the DRB. Mr. Hall said the Agency had determined there is no function of the wetland to protect. Mr. Matosky said the stormwater system has been redesigned and fully compliant with the standards. Roof runoff requires no treatment and must be retained. The only runoff that goes into the wetland is roof runoff. If there is a concern with that, it can be looked into. He said he would discuss it with Mr. DiPietro. Ms. LaRose said there may be other staff requests to delineate the wetland to keep people out of it. Mr. Dinklage suggested that wetland concerns be settled before preliminary plat. Mr. Hall said they have a time issue and will go to preliminary at their own risk. Mr. Dinklage raised a question regarding a sidewalk down the landscaped area in the middle and how people would get to the building in winter. Mr. Matosky said they have bigger parking lots with no sidewalks. They will put a sidewalk in front of the building. Mr. Matosky said they have always had the intent to have a varying undulating terrain on Kimball Avenue; however, there is no berm in the right-of-way. Mr. Belair noted there is grading in the right-of-way. Mr. Matosky said that is just to "make it clean." Mr. Belair said he will check with Public Works on this. Mr. Matosky said they feel it is important to site the building as they have with a centralized green. Members felt that was a nice look. -5- SOUTH L ,RLINGTON DEVELOPMENT RE, hW BOARD Minutes SEPTEMBER 4, 2007 Mr. Belair said that unless they have a solid berm, they will see significant parking. He felt there should be mitigation, and tree trunks don't work. Mr. Matosky said he didn't feel that would look natural or right. Ms. LaRose said she would like to see how many evergreens there will be. Mr. Cimonetti noted that construction on lot 2 triggers 2500 feet of rec path. For the Rec Path Committee to give any advice, they need some detail as to what the rec path is planned to do east and west of lot #2. Mr. Cimonetti stressed that the path shouldn't be isolated at the extreme east and west. There has to be something to bring people to Kimball Avenue. Members were OK with the 50-foot building (requiring a 15 foot height waiver). Mr. Belair questioned the location of the dumpster. Ms. LaRose felt it should be as far from the wetland as possible. Mr. Matosky said they will consider this. Mr. Dinklage stressed that water generated from the sump pump cannot go into the city sewer system. As there was no further business to come before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 10:00 P.M. ,d6W i E �?- ,.L4 Clerk zo Date SE Group - Planning and Design 131 Church Street, Burlington, Vermont 04501 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST Project Name Technology Park - Lot #2 Drawing Referenced: Planting Plans L1.0, L1.1 & L1.2 Date Prepared: August 24, 2007 Date of Prices: Summer 2007 Project Status: Revisions: October 2, 2007 Sheet 2 of 3 KEY ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST SUB TOTAL REMARKS Shrubs CR Gray Dogwood 60 EA. $55.00 $3,300.00 30-36" CS Red Dogwood 145 EA. $55.00 $7,975.00 3 Gal. IV Winterberry'Winter Red' 52 EA. $41.25 $2,145.00 3 Gal. IVJ Winterberry'Jim Dandy' 16 EA. $41.25 $660.00 3 Gal. JH Bar Harbor Juniper 322 EA. $44.38 $14,288.75 2 Gal. TC Spreading Yew 118 EA. $111.88 $13,201.25 24-30" SP Shirobana Spirea 21 EA. $41.88 $879.38 18-24" Sub -Total $41,789.38 SE Group - Planning and Design 131 Chruch Street, Burlington, Vermont 05401 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST Project Name Technology Park - Lot 42 Drawing Referenced: Planting Plans L1.0, L1.1 & L1.2 Date Prepared: August 24, 2007 Date of Prices: Summer 2007 Project Status: Revisions: October 2, 2007 Sheet 1 of 3 KEY ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST SUB TOTAL REMARKS TREES AC Serviceberry 18 EA. $375.00 $6,750.00 6-8' AF Red Maple'Autumn Blaze' 9 EA. $655.00 $5,895.00 2 1/2-3" Cal. AR Red Maple 16 EA. $525.00 $8,400.00 2 1/2-3" Cal. GT Shade Master Honeylocust 12 EA. $508.26 $6,099.12 2 1/2-3" Cal. MS Sargent Crabapple 25 EA. $472.50 $11,812.50 2-2 1/2" Cal. PC Chanticleer Pear 8 EA. $537.50 $4,300.00 2 1/2-3" Cal. PG White Spruce 33 EA. $262.50 $8,662.50 5-6' PN Austrian Pine 13 EA. $460.00 $5,980.00 7-8' PS White Pine 29 EA. $362.50 $10,512.50 7-8' QP Pin Oak 53 EA. $590.00 $31,270.00 2 1/2-3" Cal. SR Japanese Lilac 18 EA. $515.00 $9,270.00 8-10' Sub -Total $108,951.62 SE Group - Planning and Design 131 Church Street, Burlington, Vermont 05401 STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST Project Name Technology Park - Lot #2 Drawing Referenced: Planting Plans L1.0, L1.1 & L1.2 Date Prepared: August 24, 2007 Date of Prices: Summer 2007 Project Status: Revisions: October 2, 2007 Sheet 3 of 3 KEY ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT COST SUB TOTAL REMARKS Perennials FR Meadowsweet 157 EA. $14.00 $2,198.00 1 Gal. Oliver Seed Mix 1/2 lb. EA. $14.55 $14.55 1 Gal. Sub -Total $2,198.00 Shrub Sub -Total $41,789.38 Tree Sub -Total $108,951.62 Total $152,939.00 i(iml tll f1�i p[an CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: -0�() b NAME MAILING ADDRESS f�'.Gr 2. HoNc-!5 J?✓,'C6—I 1-5 v rl'u kjrjT'o,'4 PROJECT OF INTEREST S 1 { KO A P! wZt'j /ram K 1TEc rS _ 72Z IN, S(7 S . `-T T 0, �7 ZZZ 'D oj2 sm? S-T' CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE; NAME MAILING ADDRESS 50 nice' J4Yi-o4 6C> , & 2 /� 117o,: 0/L �&VA'L /Q PROJECT nF INT9=0=Q-r %G c� Alp -CA L. 'd- Tue6.ey Dr, LON- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon recei t of otice of a d appehaval the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the eal to appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE. NAME nneu Wfl- __ _ CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 5, 2007 Jennifer Desautels Jeremy Matosky Trudell Consulting Engineers PO Box 308 Williston, VT 05495 Re: Site Plan #SP-07-67 Dear Ms. Desautels & Mr. Matosky: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board October 2, 2007 (effective 10/4/07). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit be obtained within six (6) months. Should you have any questions, please contact our office. Sincerely, -3-& L k J 1`2 Betsy McD nough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7007 0220 0001 5883 9716 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 5, 2007 Mark Hall Esq. Paul Frank & Collins PO Box 1307 Burlington, VT 05402-1307 Re: Technology Park Dear Mr. Hall: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant l 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 5, 2007 Tim McKenzie 30 Community Drive #4 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Technology Park Dear Mr. McKenzie: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 October 5, 2007 Bill Cimonetti 1393 Spear Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Technology Park Dear Mr. Cimonetti: Pursuant to 24 VSA 4464(b)(3), enclosed please find a copy of the Development Review Board decision regarding the above referenced matter. You are being provided a copy of this decision because you appeared or were heard at the hearing. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact this office. Sincerely, V \ Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 September 11, 2007 Green Mountain Power Corp. 163 Acorn Lane Colchester, VT 05446 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely,—f)c� 1^ qcs Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. .:ITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTOo, DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 September 11, 2007 Pizzagalli Properties 50 Joy Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts property you own. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 August 29, 2007 Town Clerk Town of Williston 7900 Williston Road Williston, VT 05495 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts the Town of Williston. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. cc: Lee Nellis, AICP Vermont Secretary of State Page 1 of 1 r.r Tradename Information Trade Name BURLINGTON PROPERTIES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Status Inactive File Number 0076500 Address 29199 ORCHARD LAKE City State Zip FARMINGTON HLS MI 48018 Description REAL ESTATE HOLDING Registration Date 11/29/1988 Member 1 PETER POLLAK Address 29199 ORCHARD LAKE City State Zip 48018 Member 2 LAURA POLLAK Address SAME City State Zip Agent THOMAS F. HEILMANN & ASSOCIATES Address 35 KING ST BOX 216 City State Zip IBURLINGTON, VT, 05402 Above accurate as of: 09/10/2007 I1110rnnakon Cant; �:l Home I Site Search I Help Vermont State Page I Disclaimer This Web Page is http://cgi.sec.state.vt.us/cgi-shl/nhayer.exe?corpbrow?form_id=tradname?tradnumb=0076... 9/11 /2007