The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0088 Technology Park WayAbby A. Dery, P.E. From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Abby and Andrew, Carr, Helen <Helen.Carr@state.vt.us> Monday, March 30, 2015 11:55 AM Abby A. Dery, P.E. Andrew Mills RE: 14-088 - Tech Park Lot 3 EFA Thank you for your patience while 1 completed my review of the Engineering Feasibility Analysis for Lot 3 of Technology park. Based on the fact that you are able to meet CPv and Water Quality requirements and waive the recharge requirement, I found this EFA to be acceptable. The stormwater program will allow the construction to be completed according to the plans you have provided. Please keep in mind that you are operating under an expired permit in an impaired watershed and this permit will be required to be renewed at some point. I have already let the coordinator at Act 250 know this information. I am currently reviewing the moderate risk construction application for this project at Technology Park. I will contact you with any comments or questions when I complete my review. Best, Helen Helen Carr, Stormwater District Manager Southern Chittenden County 802-49o-6170 / Belem Carr (>) state. yt.us From: Shane M. Mullen, P.E. [mailto:Shane.Mullen@tcevt.com] Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 3:05 PM To: Carr, Helen Cc: Andrew Mills Subject: 14-088 - Tech Park Lot 3 EFA Helen, See attached materials. Andrew is cc'd here, please let him know if you have any questions/comments on this project. Regards, Shane M. Mullen, P.E. Project f."igineer o: 802.879.033/ .v�1 /2 SO".3/3./722 Civil Engineering � Ad§+ 1� Land Surveying TRUDELL Consulting Engineers Land cape <,Irchiteclure Environmental Servi6'e' 1 Abby A. Dery, P.E. From: Tom Dipietro <tdipietro@sburl.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 3:16 PM To: Shane M. Mullen, P.E. Cc: Abby A. Dery, P.E. Subject: Re: DRB Site Plan Review: 88 Technology Park Way Lot 3 Got it. Thanks. The title 3 coverage is a tricky thing. It appears that this project will be ok if we end up using the 2002 standards for renewals. Others will likely need upgrades even though they have title 3. However, if some new standard is established everyone could end up needing to do more to get their title 3 permits into compliance. In any case, this looks fine to me. Sent from my iPad Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. On Dec 10, 2014, at 3:03 PM, Shane M. Mullen, P.E. <Shane.Mullen@tcevt.com> wrote: Tom, The permit is not expired, it has Title III coverage. The proposed project was part of that old permit, so they are not requiring a new permit. I'll forward the email chain I had with ANR regarding this so you have a bit more background. Regards, - smm From: Tom Dipietro [mailto_tdi ietro sburl.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 2:35 PM To: Shane M. Mullen, P.E. Cc: Abby A. Dery, P.E. Subject: RE: DRB Site Plan Review: 88 Technology Park Way Lot 3 Thanks Shane. I had not received this information. One thing still puzzles me: ANR didn't issue you a valid permit for this? They are saying that it is covered under the expired permit? Am I misunderstanding what is in the narrative? Thomas J. DiPietro Jr. Deputy Director Department of Public Works City of South Burlington Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Shane M. Mullen, P.E. [mailto:Shane.Mullen@tcevt.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 2:52 PM To: Tom Dipietro Cc: Abby A. Dery, P.E. Subject: FW: DRB Site Plan Review: 88 Technology Park Way Lot 3 Tom, Just left you a voicemail. It doesn't appear that you received our stormwater narrative. See attached report and modeling results, let me know if you have any further questions/comments on the project. Thanks, Shane M. Mullen, P.E. Project Engineer o: 802.879.6331 x112 c. 802.343.1722 <image001 jpg> Civil Engineering Land Surveying Landfcape Architecture Environmental Services 478 Blair Park Road, Williston, Vermont 05495 www.tcevt.com <image002.gif> From: Abby A. Dery, P.E. Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 10:04 AM To: Shane M. Mullen, P.E. Subject: FW: DRB Site Plan Review: 88 Technology Park Way Lot 3 Hi Shane - Can you provide a response to Tom Dipietro's comments below? Thanks! From: ray [mailto:ray@sburl.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 1:55 PM To: Abby A. Dery, P.E. Subject: FW: DRB Site Plan Review: 88 Technology Park Way Lot 3 Abby, See comments below. Ray Belair Administrative Officer 2 City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburi.com www.sbpathtosustainabilitV.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Justin Rabidoux Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 12:34 PM To: ray Subject: FW: DRB Site Plan Review: 88 Technology Park Way Lot 3 From: Tom Dipietro Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 3:28 PM To: Justin Rabidoux Subject: DRB Site Plan Review: 88 Technology Park Way Lot 3 Justin, I reviewed the plans for 88 Technology Park Way that were prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers and last revised on 10/30/14. 1 would like to offer the following comments: • The project proposes to disturb greater than 1 acre of land and create greater than 1 acre of impervious area. Therefore, it will need construction (3-9020) and operational (3-9015) stormwater permits from the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. • The applicant should provide information on the existing State permit coverage for this project (permit number 1-1458) and how it will be updated/amended to facilitate this project. • The applicant proposes to make changes to the extended detention wetland outlet located on lot 2. Provide updated hydrologic model information related to the detention wetland and its treatment/detention of runoff from lots 2 and 3. • The DRB should confirm that the applicant has permission to make changes on adjacent lots (e.g. changes to wetland outlet, snow storage area shown crossing the lot boundary, and landscaping berm). My review assumes that these lots are also owned by Technology Park LLC, or that agreements are in place. • The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to regularly maintain all stormwater treatment and conveyance structures on site. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Thomas J. DiPietro Jr. Deputy Director Department of Public Works 104 Landfill Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 658-7961 x108 Email: Tdipietro@sburl.com Web Site: www.sburl.com Twitter: @SBPubWorks Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. 88 TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY TECHNOLOGY PARK - LOT 3 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF A PROPOSED 54,459 S.F. OFFICE BUILDING, RELATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS, LANDSCAPING, UTILITIES, AND LIGHTING. Owner/Applicant Architect: Engineer: TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS, LLC. STEVEN SCHENKER TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 55 COMMUNITY DRIVE #402 5224 SHELBURNE RD 478 BLAIR PARK ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 SHELBURNE, VT 05482 WILLISTON, VT 05495 (802)860-1691 (802)985-5595 (802)879-6331 "SITE PLAN EE SUBMISSION SET (NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION) DRAWING INDEX SUBDIVISION PLAT SHEET 1 OF 4 EASEMENT PLAT SHEET 3 OF 4 C1-00 COVER SHEET C1-01 LEGEND AND NOTES C1-02 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C2-01 OVERALL SITE PLAN C2-02 SITE PLAN L1-01 LANDSCAPING PLAN C5-01 DEMOLITION AND EPSC PLAN PHASE I C8-01 SEWER & WATER DETAILS C8-02 EROSION & STORM DETAILS C8-03 SITE DETAILS L2-01 LIGHTING PLAN A5.1 BUILDING SECTIONS A4.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.0 BASEMENT PLAN A2.1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN A2.2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN A2.3 THIRD FLOOR PLAN A2.4 ROOF PLAN USE AND INTERPRETATION OF THE DRAWINGS M BEFORE USING THESE PLANS ENSURE THAT YOU HAVE THE LATEST REVISION LAST REVISED: 10/30/14 ISSUED FOR PERMITTING TICE PROJECT NO: 2014088 I t doo e - TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS .>s aART PAiR( R I -USPX .Fw10HT —S rot eTs wT I ..aravrow fCEIVED CMS %Ff'T`�Orul f�? ity of So. Burlington r Ll tax map no. 0980-00102 WOODLAND COMMONS COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUM v 258 P. 296 map slide 201 tax map no. 0980-00106 CABLE HOLDCO EXCHANGE Ill, LLC 3 e v. 761 p. 262 map slide 175 0 C2q N lox map no. 0980-00110 g h RUBY B. WILLIS FAMILY TRUST v. 506 p. 242 map slide 704 L27 K/MBgLL S76 ? E q VENUE 32e taz map no. ss. TECHNOLOGYPARK PARTNERS PARK PARTNERS LLC v. 803 p. 112 map slide 541 15.55 Ae, tax map no. 1260-00200 D. & L OBRIEN map48llde 07 tax map no. 0860-RR750 PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLC v 681 p. 736 mop slide 176 I, I' PIA. WPOP FENCE POST -- U LEGEND S7) RfOAR (SEi ) O NFl3AR (TO e('. STT ) � IRON PIPC (VWND ) CONCRf R Mc-.' ( mu'D ) CQNGYtt f MONIIHENI ( sf T ) C4 wlselfD av e(ulcNe TT APN()N 17 corvcRrrf MONUMENT (ra RE s11) [� -x-x-x--x-x- -CU ATED P(A'NI xsRe INGE TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC V. 898 P. 210 map slide 510 map slide 541 1_01 1 4,49 Ae. _ 1r SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Received for Record _ --------- -d. 201__ at ----------- a'doek _-____..--_- - minutes M and Recorded in Attest City Clerk LO taz map no. 0980-00120 LLJ LOLLING COMPANY 478 p. 682 map slide 104 Z tax map no, 1713-00124 124 TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY LLC v. 812 p. 269 map slide 510 LOT ,2 5.00 Ae. 3 n - N " 4 o N. (o h fxl.:nN(' tiurtrnNc 7ECH1 f tax map no. 1260-00200 TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC v. 898 p, 210 ( map fide 510 T I map slide 541 101 14 e, 9.10 Ae. /) 7: h 69294' OUMF51{R -' a T ^HD nA :.. .._ Innx1ANx v AGNamll) FUEL IANx LYrAIY' pN K _ D MOUNIfO x k.". - PAven PAW - AREA 'x'av N'NON 60' R.O.W. CONVEYED TO L24 ------- CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON i 424 p. 693 S7gb?'OT E 490.00• Graph1c Scale Feet 120 -0 120 240 360 480 PA W,D PAWING ANLA C7 -OGY PARK CAMPUS LLC v. 898 P. 210 map slide 5/ mop slide 54141 LOT 3 3.98 Ae. TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC v. 898 p. 210 map slide 510 op slide 541 LOT 6 Z90 Ae- tax map no. 0740-00021 INVESTORS CORP. OF VL v, 364 p. 535 map slide 222 S83 42 52 E" 3)0. 02' APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. ON THE ____ DAY OF _ 201 SUBJECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION. SIGNED THIS DAY OF 201_ BY ___ -___,-------- --_-, CHAIRMAN OR CLERK TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS v. 898 p, 210 map slide 510 map slide 541 LOT 4 5.71 Ae. 75201' . c /J tax map no. 0436-00030 30 COMMUNITY DRIVE LLC v 803 p. 129 nuw>srfR.S map slide 510 LOT BA J 29.44 Ae. N U Pavrn ARKING �_ AREA taxmap no. 0740-00020 W,W. GRAINGER, INC. W v. 338 p. 691 map slide 222 tax map no. 1560-00715 CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON v. 265 p, 470 map slide 176 rcp 55 GTY DRIVE LLC v. 872 v. 872 p. 448 mop slide 506 1__ 01 .`.> I 7.8 A,, tax map no. 7-69-47 \� C. SHEPARD 382 p. 597 \. map slide 489E `\ \ 4 L7 o\,\ G.M.P. C. v. 134 p. 186 z \� v. 107 P.1,17 _ 1.00 Ae. 55 COMUNITY DRIVE LL v 812 p. 448 map slide 506 LOT 7 11.2 Ac.+- jb�tiry auumrvc EXISTING ftUILDIN4 SEE SHEET 2 OF 4 220.607 LINE DATA TABLE No. Bearing__. Distance L7 S78'08'52"E 77.48' L2 S88'06'13"E 57.90' L3 S83'4252"E 117-22' L4 S78-0852"E 16.00' L5 S0621'O8"W 25.00' _ L6 N24 37'17"W 30.95' L7 S11'46'34"W 9.97' LS N3406'01"W 167' L9 52859"4,T 20.00' L12 N8103'24"W 75'+_ L13 NOS'56'36"E 209.00' L14 N8103'24"W 209.00' L15_ S0856'36"W 209.00' L16 N0621'OeE 26.00' L17 S78'0852"E 18.00' L18 S8103"24"E 209L00' L19 54246'59"W 3D 17' L22 S7907'01"E 124-53' L23 S62 32'11 "W 81.94' L24 57907'01"E 130.85' L25 N13'41'33"E 144.82' _ L26 N0745'49"W 63.73' L27 S/808'52"E 118.74' L28 N6232'1I "E 62.71' L34 S1505'41"W 32.25' L35 S1505.42"W__ 28.00' L36 S02-12'72"E 92.70' L37 N0274'07"W 91,57' L38 N00'55'58'E 41.34' L39 S43'49'22'E 23.57' L42 S55"10'26"W 38.92' L47 58342'51"E 92.29' L52 S8103.24"E 62.54' L53 S7924'49"E 167'1 Bq� lY\\� PNO)ECr LOCAITON CURVE DATA TABLE No. Delta Radius Are Length. Chord Length Chord Bearing CI 2347'00" 143.18 59.43 59.01 S71'4922"E C7 6449'34" 412.00 466.15 441.68 S68-28'12"W C8 _ 9248'34" 317,00 513.49 459.16 N32'42'44"W C11 240036" 472.00 197.79 196.35 N480343E C17 3328'29" 472.00 275.76 271.86 N84'08'45"E C19 4913'52" _ 377. 00 323.94 314.06 S5430'05"E C20 0720'25" 833.00 106,72 106.64 N1O01'20"E C21 0720'25" 773.00 99.03 98.96 S1001'20"W C22 342637" 37700 226.63 223.24 S03'31'45'E C23 02*02*23' 1560.00 55.53 55.53 S5959'06"E C24 17'0835" 1540-00 460.77 459,06 S69'3434E C28 _ 0720'30" 472.00 60,48 60.44 S63'44'16"W___ C32 15'52'43" 867.00 240.27 239.50 S0747'29"W C33 1551'27" 927.00 256.56 255.74 _ S07'46'52"W C34 07'21'36" 1086.75 139.60 139.50 N05'3538"E C35 0696'59" 1026.75 112.59 112,54 _ N0607'56"E C36 062721" 867,00 97,69 97.64 S3249'44"W- C37 04'1724- _ 927.00 69.39___ S313322"W .38.72 38.11 S34'52'44"W C39 0637'40" ]694_1 f086_JS _ 123.81 123.75 S012100E C40 07'44'01" 1026.75 138.59 738.48 N005234W C THE LOTS ALONG COMMUNITY DRIVE MAY BE SUBJECT TO 10' WIDE EASEMENTS FOR �+ POWER, TELEPHONE AND GAS. SAID EASEMENTS TO RUN ALONG AND ADJACENT TO I COMMUNITY DRIVE. I( + NOTES: CENTERLINE 1) DEEDS RESEARCHED IN THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON LAND RECORDS. 2) A CLOSED FIELD TRAVERSE CONDUCTED WITH A TOTAL STATION. BEARINGS ARE MUDDY BROOK \ 1� NOrf 9 BASED ON VERMONT GRID NORTH. 3) REBARS SET ARE NO. 5 REINFORCING BARS WITH ALUMINUM CAPS STAMPED 116 "TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LS 486". 4) DISTANCES ARE SHOWN TO THE HUNDREDTH OF A FOOT AND BEARINGS ARE SHOWN TO THE SECOND FOR MATHEMATICAL CLOSURE PURPOSES ONLY. 5) AN ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO IDENTIFY OR DELINEATE EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY, LEASE LANDS, ENCROACHMENTS, ETC OBSERVED IN THE FIELD OR READILY FOUND IN THE LAND RECORDS. ADDITIONAL ENCUMBRANCES MAY EXIST WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. 6) UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHOWN ARE BASED ON ABOVE GROUND STRUCTURES AND PLANS OF RECORD. ACTUAL LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND LINES MAY VARY. ' 7) KIMBALL AVENUE IS BASED ON PLANS OF THE VERMONT AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION, PROJECT SOUTH BURLINGTON M 5000 (f0)S. A PORTION OF THIS LAND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER AND SOME PERMANENT RIGHTS ALONG KIMBALL AVENUE WERE CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF VERMONT IN VOLUME 211 PAGE 80 AND 85, AND FROM THE STATE TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON IN VOLUME N�YAOIIWIIWy)NN 211 PAGE 304. A PORTION OF KIMBALL AVENUE WAS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF \1AE pF VE.YNi SOUTH BURLINCTON IN VOLUME 120 PAGE 428, 8) THE RIGHT OF WAY old FOR COMMUNITY DRIVE WAS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON IN VOLUME 424 PAGE 693. THE EASTERLY PORTION OF _ `yP semiyt`a;; COMMUNITY DRIVE WAS CHANGED AS DESCRIBED IN THREE DEEDS RECORDED IN VOLUME- 801 PAGES 110. 119 AND 122 AND SHOWN ON TWO PLATS BY TRUDELL CONSULTING N. ces * "BOUNDARY ENGINEERS, ONE ENTITLED LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT, TECHNOLOGY PARK ASSOC., CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON'. DATED JULY 16, 2007 AND RECORDED IN MAP SIDE 506, THE "BOUNDARY AND OTHER ENITLED LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT, HNwblrxlninlW �aP4 TECHNOLOGY PARK ASSOG-. DATED .NNE 27, 2007 AND RECORDED IN MAP SLIDE 508. TWO TRIANGLES AT THE WESTERLY INTERSECTION OF KIMBALL. AVENUE,ANtY:''`. COMMUNITY DRIVE WERE CONVEYED TO THE CITY .or 50ITTH R(FRi MG7oN IN VOLUME tox map no. 7-69-57 916 PAGE 284 AND VOLUME 916 PAGE 286. PARKV7EW AT TICONDEROGA, LLC 9) THE BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN THE TOWN OF. WILLISTON AND THE CITY Or 910 p. 163 SOUTH BURLINGTON, AND THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF THIS SUBDIVISION FOLLOWS THE ratslide 489Q i CENTERLINE OF MUDDY BROOK. 10) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO A STORM WAFER DRAINAGE SEROCE AGREEMENT WAIVER AND EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED IN VO.UME 507 PAGE 437. NOV �"�" �'n SEE SHEET 3 OF 4 FOR EASEMENTS Subdivision Plat MawhlS ntmber 10,/IUD M12 �_. i._ \\ A QL� 15.3 TECHNOLOGY PARK 55 Community Drive Suite 402 8 uPe.m Axmxa, xoa�eAra 67a7/13 SLIT So. Burlington, VL �„ Aearn4arY I e a4Hxtmmt s(alY tasecllwl F4tl gook ,,!'i DlSk ]DO ___. I 1 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS °°" 1 ` _) Will � Y-t - t1307T �1,N,,.,Y,tuxt- SHEET t OF 4 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. CITY CLERK'S OFFICE tax map no. 0980-OOt02 APPROVED BY RESOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD OF THE CITY OF�'- WOODLAND COMMONS Received for Record -___-____--__ o.d. 201_ SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT. ON 714E ____ DAY OF ___ 201__, ! \ +•lam._.,,_ COMMERCIAL CONDOMINIUM I- map no. 0980-00106 ------ v. 258 296 at .,clock minutes M P CABLE HOLDCO EXCHANGE 111, LLC ----- — --- SUBJECT TO 714E REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF SAID RESOLUTION. : / O[.q N r / mop sl(de 201 e 761 p. 262 and Recorded in SIGNED THIS DAY OF _ 201 '^$p, Nr map slide 175 --------- Attest _ --------------- BY CHAIRMAN OR CLERK t' Y --- TO EASEMENT FOR LING OH City Clerk ip Ct1Y OF 50. BURLING,TON ` 3 � Y n4 s<i x s0• u N fax map no. 0980 00110 O -, Z o _30\). SIGN env ro RUBY B. WLLIS FAMILY TRUST , 506 p. 242 ne �/ o o maP slide 104 p no. 0980-00120 tax ma ry tax ma W e''u n�_ LOT 7 /)0� n ,ASE&RN7 to P no. 0740-00021 W m+^ !„ .- EDLUND COMPANY INVESTORS CORP. OF VT. N E , & 478 p. 682 Q, v. 364 p. 635 1"\• ' 1.n p. 3aa ( ] mop slide 104 map slide 222 Q �� 'a WAi R """' t D / \ VE L7) IO EASEMENT Faz BIKEPa FH E � az ma n0 D740 0002 s,X.'•` sm . 439 . err rn ,o euNL. v. 38lide 222 `� TO UF( bUE _ ro ( IY Of pso FAIR,111; ro 07 R 42, (J W'W- GRAINGCR, INC. /� LA SEMEN7 AREAS AS L,PNVEYED iD P R IZON NEW I_NGLAND, INC. is, x 3o' LEJ SIGN[ASEMfm....-.. v 177 p. 537 I MENT TO _ _ - lr E� 79 p 4/1 PRO 5' ELePHONE ovrteAnNr.. 1 ACo. OF VERM(XJT 1 -70U LAST -MINT -_ - _ .-_ -_ tax map 0.. 1560 00715 v. IJI P. 795 \ To G.M.P.C. - �� ! - __ \ _ - - CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON sfE Norz 6 .. -- _. \`•\ v. 674 R. Jas I,r _`'w 265 P. 470 / -..� ...._. TOP fASFMEN1 nREA ` �X � - __� - __ mop slide 176 LOT 5 \ t'/.. ._..� EXISTING G.M.P.C. LOT l Vv\ FOR Lor 3 EXISTING EASEMENT io' I ;�,� I ' - - \ / DETAIL A i uePorN1 c wMuwCA11 S SEC NOTL 6 t 111 ` I r 20 WATER EASEMENT TO \ tlnLllY f ASFMEN7 //�� , •1 COAMFLAT, WAR. DISTR+C, E ! ' \ �. V 827 p ?3U..F ( � L. l! 7 .� �., �._.y \ \ 1 ( _-_ ._.-_._._.._ . t sr- 2Q l R Y. to? . 127- I. 20" SF WIR LAStl11EN( tG� I I , ( , ''`'( " _ - _ NE.T & I. �\� Graphic Scale CITY a SV RotiIi SIGN ,(I v 131 Feet tax map no. 1260-00200 7.p O 20 40 60 SO D, 48L�OBRIEN L07 8C I _ ',v\V (. FCHNOLOGY PARK WAY ( �1\\\ ! map slide 307 t ( I (� DRAINAGE VIVA f'-w woPoST, to, stnrWAtK I i ---- _ ( ' / /� _ A \ Gaphic Sale TOh' LOT J4 ' & UTILITY £ASLMENI LOT T ) \ I 1 , V`,A FO A(LESS & I ( tax map no 7 69-47 Feet \ I n812 EASEMENT 1 :\\ v a,z P. zss I , \.\ \ ( SHEPARD 170 O 120 240 360 4t10 ((( - map slide 489B JI ( lL VAULT sw 15s mo• East MENT '• 1 1 lN� /1 rI v. rrz R. saa '(('��:. v. 674 I 1 wit -.._- % JU' WIPE SE WCR EA,SEMFNi ' I TV CITY OF SO. BURL. ! J[ , N4 R o EASEMENT (' ( 10 :IIY OF 50. BURL. J r J G _ ) �� , , • v SO/ R. 425 / ( v 5E1 p 415— L _ 134 p 186 74 107 p. 141 LOT, , ,; - EASFMEN"5 I THE LOTS ALONG COMMUNITY DRIVE MAY BE SUBJECT TO WIDE EASEMENTS FOR SEE OE FAIL A •, / UNDERGROUND UBLITY LINES. SAID EASEMENTS TO RUN ALONG AND ADJACENT 70 PROPOSED EAST MI NI _ I /� 1 w 0' FORCE MA NMS COMMUNITY DRIVE. --,CITY EASE Mf Nt STARTS TO L07 5 fUk � - I ' lFORCE MAIN ,0' S(JU IFI OF MIT ' ( !._.-_2 IN / IU'fASI MENT 70 'vim (( --IO' S(WER tASf NT vT: GAS SYSTEMS L.ASEMENT TO //• 1) AN ATTEMPT HAS BEEN MADE TO IDENTIFY OR DELINEATE EASEMENTS, RIGHTS I I • , TO LOT 8A v. 397 p 56 J J , i CITY OF SO BURL. /� OF WAY, LEASE LANDS, ENCROACHMENTS, ETC, OBSERVED IN THE FIELD OR 81 \A(/(, ,-� PROF'osr1 E__ I / READILY FOUND IN THE LAND RECORDS. ADDITIONAL ENCUMBRANCES MAY EXIST I T �ll EASEMEN I ALONG WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. ,r , EXISTING LINES (ON ---G.M.P. EASEMENT l ` 2 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHOWN ARE BASED ON ABOVE GROUND ' , I , I �/• '�� ___� POWTR AND v. 772 ..`FBA T IELEPNOR R I � STRUCTURES AND PLANS OF RECORD ACTUAL LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND LINES __- r• y T j j� VA Y _o r le rr �JQ\ ( 3) KIA48ALL AVENUE IS BASED ON PLANS OF THE VERMONT AGENCY OF r ' l� tax map no. 0860-RR750 ( / / v d / \ , ;, r0' EASLMENI ,o ' i I, , TRANSPORTATION, PROJECT SOUTH BURLINGTON M 5000 /0)S. A PORTION OF THIS PIZZAGALLI PROPERTIES, LLC ! r ; SIT GA5 SY51FM _ LAND AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER AND SOME PERMANENT RIGHTS ALONG KIMBALL X. 681 p. 736�' AVENUE WERE CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF VERMONT IN VOLUME 211 PAGE 80 ma slide 776 ' -- P i <x O ' ' �t AND A AND FROM THE STATE TO THE CITY OF SOUTH DEEDED TO IN VOLUME I- c.i T T � II 211 PAGE 304 A PORTION !1F KIMBALL AVENUE WAS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF ' 1 , __ ` ABovT cRIXwn prj' SOUTH BURLINGTON IN VOLUME /20 PACE 428 PRa'USED 10' wa If / 1 1 1 °' i' 4\ -7 Z �.-----wrxaGeN \ru['+_ raNx- ','�/- -_•-•-- _ 4) THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR COMMUNITY DRIVE WAS DEEDED TO THE CITY of SOUTH _ rnNx J _.:.� _ I I I --'►)i DRIVE WAS H VOLUME 424 PAGE 693 THE EASTERLY PORTION OF COMMUNITY E FlSEMCNT TO CITY VI 1 O \ A 1 I x ��"�_ �! /)J �' - 20 EAST MTNT [OR' DRIVE WAS CHANCED AS DESCRIBED IN THREE DEEDS RECORDED IN VOLUME 801 T IN SVLJiH BURLINI i(ME--,___.. _.._.._ /7 I' ) l r _ _ _ 1 /// RECREATION PATH PAGES RS. 779 AND 722 AND SHOWN"BOUNDARY ON TWO PLATS T PLAT, TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING \ f` _ �`\ i , / •7 TO CITY,111, 50. HURL. ENGINEERS, ONE ENTITLED BWNDARY LME ADJUSTMENT PLAT, TECHNOLOGY PARK v. 507 ;39 ASSOC., CITY OF SOUTH BURLINCTDN", DATED JULY 16, 2007 AND RECORDED IN PA V£lJ PAD MOON IfO I 2 ,i I I %% ' MAP SLIDE 508 AND THE OTHER ENTITLED "BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT, 100 FA EMINI ]O G M P G TECHNOLOGY PARK ASSOC.', DATED DUNE 27 2007AND RECORDED IN MAP SLIDE I,J 671 P. 731 508. 5) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO A STORM WATER DRAINAGE SERVICE AGREEMENT WAIVER AND EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED IN VOLUME 507 PAGE 431. WATIR EASEMENT III ot.rY OT So, BUR1. III --�\ ®6 THE EASEMENT TO TELEPHONE OPERATING COMPANY OF VERMONT LLC (DBA FA/RPOINTCOMMUNICATIONS) IS TEN (10) FEET ONBOTH SIDES OF THE CENTERLINE E fxl 12-^o J I �, l OF INSTALLED CONDUITS FOR UNDERGROUND FACILITIES. N ADDITIONAL SIX (6) v MG p. a7O- - - / l Lxrsnwc oumvsrzx- _n ' �\ l..'P FEET FROM THE OUTER PERIMETER OF ANY VAULTS, AND TWELVE AND ONE HALF (12.5) FEET ON BOTH SIDES FROM THE OUTERMOST CONDUCTORS FOR OVERHEAD /• I>` I \ ( , . " 1 '( j T FACILITIES. ALSO INCLUDED IN THE EASFMLN F ARIA IS AN AREA 10 Of Kk PI CLEAR UP SIX (6) FEET FROM THE EXPOSED FUELS OF ALL ABOVE GROUND r it APPROXIMATE LOCAIMN (N FACILITIES. �• ,,�• pw sMoxwc -y , tax ma no. 7-69-51 W, , I 111E EASTERLY EDGE (x" THE - - D ---I fl v_ ( eJJ, PaVruav �'r AIRPORT APPROACH CONE: 1p ` /4 i( ( \ ` PARKVIEW AT TICONDEROGA, LLC S\N\N1INnWllu/y/�G -'�A ' PAVLII n / \ rARx+Nc L ;I, �! #; v. 410 p. 163 u OF VFr, 60' R.O.W. CONVEYED TO l VA ( \, A mop slide 4898 �t6 co 2 CITY OF SO. BURLINGTON v. 424 p. 693 ,l SW3 /\ . 4 e LEGEND, POND Jn p sas \• A R. vo �f' �/• lct-Nct°ype- O RIRAR i to 0, :£!) ` , °'�..� \ l //. \ S �,a�N p�qq '•'.: . ,. ,\(.\M P TRANSFORMER T2T IR(xJ PIP(' t s: I ) \ S,OC v \ _.WA(__ ` �i i 'PRpYDSEO 20' EASVIO N \ 10 Sv PROF VSEU 15' BIKFPATH, \ v/j OR WATER�TIMO IRON PIPE' ( 101/NU) ` `ANOSLAPING, LIGHTING AN(/� / .- �,.� I(ILOING - CON(:RT IE: MONUMENT (TOUNO) �' \ . S"I[lF WALK' EASEMENT - v _ _ CITY OI SU BURL. Y ' \ I \ \ \ \ VD /37M(.Di-(W - ( Off FlIMINA7 ) PA \CA_p\y\ Po, / / D SEE SHEET 1 OF 4 FOR METES AND BOUNDS INFORMATION CONCRETE MOPRUENT ( /O BE SET) "L___ ARkING gHI.A ` \ / lXI511Nf. •' 1 X B \ _. 1 ---,- `� �RIXLINN f \ - G O MI OWfR CO RR ICU ILO P(XNI � -MTC 6 �.-_._ '-' / y, '. _ -._.-W- .....- I—INT; Wa t[n urvt':' 'I .. \. as /: / / ,� \ \ \ v 614 p' 7.31R HT'. �' \�� 7'.� \ STORMWARN AGRF:f MENT �`v�� 1/0' EASEMENT Easement Plat MT rg nMmpu ?007100 44 - 1 —X—X—%—X— tNPo I ENC! - _ .. �`O.._- 505 MUNir i , �, 2 L. Saa , TECHNOLOGY PARK 1XISTIN( SE..R (NE I �: -. � _ `• - /, ,\ �`. VE � \ Dp 1 JMM 10: -G-- - - I -I G NAINRA. .1 LINE L9I I ASEMFN I' t0 - -©R) 0T714/,4 SOi - - 55 Community Drive Suite 402 To, PF1lNJf (G"' POND \ © UpCaf t 6/20713 SOT UNDTR(:ROUND ITLEPHONL CAatF (G a VFRM(M1i,,'I"P E w,t }2/O6/]2 NOY to+e w /c7 r lac 11,31 p. 295 - \ ; ; A4A ta.RP�I Essen ent DG/137,2 5DT SO. Burlington, Vt. -- EIM/i - ---- FXI '1 C IN CXA. IXINp i(l1.PH[M•f' SEE NOIL 6----------- -LIRE HITJRANi f ASEMFNTS -- - ... " nn TO CITY a- S(HITH B(Lh'L.INCTON -_ _"` '( Aw A n I 1 eosemen CND 02/0470R SO ,.��}� AB+.ES —-' /' ' -- —- — - ' �"" TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) D_. _ -- NG STORMWAIFR LNE SEE SHEET 4 OF 4°" "" _-_ _l "°" r'� 4TN Nlalr Dark R-d v� moor a64vs Tr�2) B796331 www. ext<om SHEET 3 OF 4 1 DRAFT LINE SYMBOL SITE EXISTING PROPOSED REMOVED/ABANDONED EXISTING PROPOSED REMOVED/ABANDONED SITE PAVEDDRIVEORROAD ------ -- SIGN 1 41 14 GRAVELDRIVEORROAD - ---- --- PAVEDDRIVEORROAD - UTILITIES WNi CURB FREE LINE �..Y " Y Y y Y I Y. Y _Y-.y,--v-.y�._1.. SEWERMANNOIE'/STAR) O O TRADE nnnnnnnrnnnnnnrnrnrrxr....... rxrnrrr SEWER CLEANOUT(Cot o • o WEUND LIMIT PUMP STATION (PST ® TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS !« ..._.__ 121 __ STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE OMFU 0 • O STREAM __..-.... __-.. ___. _...-.__. ___ __.___ ..... ..... CATCH BASH ICE) 00 m• ❑O GUARDRAIL _.. e..---. .. ..--_x. a. _ _ _ _ _ STORM DRAINAGE CLEANOUT o • o UTILITIES o-oR END SECTION 3EWERMANS _ AND SERVICES --s--- -- s ---- s ---- s --- VALVE SEWER FORCEMAN P. FIN-----M---- CURB STOP(CS) • • • WATER MAN$ w AND SERVICES ' " - -' `• --- "' --- w--- w -- FIRE MYDRAM (HYp) � Y STORM MANAGE ---p .. - ------ WATER $UPMY WELL �By 1i (0) CURIA. MAN---cp--- ..-;.. __., c._____cp____Co____ END CAP C I C UNDERDRAIN -w--- uo __------ Vp----- up ____ BLOWOf 9 J< j ROOF DRAIN ---Pc--- HT __ IT._____ A, ----- pp---- UTILITY POLE Q¢ • -0- FOOTING DRAIN ---ro --- ro -- Fo _____ - _____ ro ____ MIC OR TRANSFORMER ❑ IRE ❑ LIDp PROPANE OR NATURAL GAS--_0--- c----- --_a--- TELEPHONE MANHOLE O • O OVERHEAD POWER TELEPHONE PEDESTAL IT UNDERGROUND POWER---w--- w __w_____w_____Ip _- _ LUMNA•E oa H oa OVERHEAD TEIFPNONF orR- «e -_ «,r____ grP____ «F__- BOLLARD LIGHT .¢ UNDERGROUND - ,A ----- w----- ----- TFIE'MON PEDESTAL o o OVERHEAD POWER E FIELD TELEPHONE------D""ar--- ormar -_. .gsPxr _..---prwp_-- UNDERGROUND POWER e. TELEPHONE----Up61 --- war ----wnr -----war --- CALCULATED POINT OVERHEAD POWER, ---amnTnc ICE CONTROL POINT -- TELEPHONES CABLE <vmarnc �_ TxIP4rab-----cwvatnl. --- STEELONTONTR UNDERGROUND POWER _ - _ waTxc waNc __ _wxrrr __ __ _ware. __ - ICE CONTROL POINT TELEPHONE B CABLES MAGNAL CABLE TELEVISION---Ln-- cry __cru_____csv_____ OBSERVATION WELL A FIBER OPTIC ---ro-- Fo __ w____-ip _____ rp____ PERCOLATION MST SURVEY sou En PIT }�{ PROPERTYUNE saL wzMG • RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE BENCHMARK EASEMENTS __ __._ ____ _________________ ___........ SURVEY FOUND TO BE SET SET FENCE STONEWALL CX>;,.5]OS;XX3:XX«3�'X'JO c v a ,, r r, r x a x Jv ia.rc IRON PIPE BUILDING SETBACKS ........... -._ -_.. _.._. .__ __ ... ___ STEEL REPAR O O 111 CONCRETE MONUMENT BR MARINE OR STONE MONUMENT IRON PIN (WI • SOME NFORMATION MAYBE PROVIDED BY OTHERS AND COULD N SHOWN WITH A DIFFERENT SYMBOL NOT SHOWN ON INS LEGEND. HOWEVER. THEY ARE LABELED ON RESPECTIVE MANS.IN SOME CASES A CHANGE IN SCALE IRIS LEGEND. E ANY QUESTIONS EMT CONTACT THE ENGINEER TO CLARIFY. CONTROL PUNS AND SOME SURVEY PLAT. OR PRINTER CAN ALTER INFORMATION DO NOT SHOW AN EXACT MATCH ON ADDIIIONAL LEGEND INFORMATION IS SUPPLIED SEPARATELY ON EROSION SURVEY NOTES. I. THE PURPOSE OF THE EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN 6 TO DEPICT PERTINENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AS OF THE DATE OF SURVEY. 2. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED UPON VERMONT GRID NORM. 3. VERTICAL DADFM S BASED ON HAVD88 (GEM ISAI. 4. COORDINATE SYSTEM IS BASED ON VERMONT STATE PLANE IUS. SURVEY FEET). 5. HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL ESTABLISHED WITH FUR GPS OBSERVATIONS FROM THE V FUV CORS STATION. A TRIMBLE R6 RZK GIPS UNIT WAS EMPLOYED FOR THESE OBSERVATIONS. 6. PERIMETER BOUNDARIES SHOWN HEREON BASED ON A PLAT ENTITLED SUBDIVISION PUN, TECHNOLOGY PARK, SHEET I OF 4. Z. THE WETLAND DELINEATION SHOW ON THIS PUN WAS PERFORMED ON JUNE S. 2012, ACCORDING 10 STANDARDS OF THE 1987 US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLAND DELINEATION MANUAL AND THE NORTHEAST REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT. THIS DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY KARINA DAILEY O TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS. RECORD DRAWING REQUIREMENTS: II A CLEAN SE O UP TO DATE RECORD DRAWINGS IS TO BE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. FOR JOBS LASTING MORE MAN 4 WEEKS A REVIEW O THE RECORD DRAWINGS WILL BE DONE BY THE ENGINEER EVERY 2 WEEKS AND COMMENT OR DEFICIENCIES MAY BE PROVIDED. 2) TIES 10 ALL BENDS. VALVES. JOINT. CONNECTIONS AND DESIGN FEATURE SHALL BE PROVIDED. DES SHALL BE PULLED FROM EASILY LOCATABLE PERMANENT ABOVE GROUND EEATURE MAY ARE VISIBLE YEAR AROUND SUCH AS BUILDING CORNERS. HYDRANTS. SEWER AND STORM MAN COVERS THAI WILL BE CLEARED IN WINTER. UTILITY, POLES, ETC, REFRAIN FROM PROVIDING TIES WITH ACUTE ANGLE. TIES SHOULD BE PULLED AT ANGLES M CLOSE TO LU DEGREE AS POSSIBLE. DES WITH ANGLE TOO ACUTE MAY BE REJECTED. 3) RECORD INFORMATION NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED ON THE APPROPRIATE DESIGN PLANS ON A WEEKLY BASS, RECORD INFORMATION REGARDING ICE DESIGN ITEM$ PLACED ON INAPPROPRIATE DESIGN PLANS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. 4) IFENGINMING SERVICES FOR 14 WEEKLY REVIEW OF RECORD INFORMATION HAVE NOT BEEN OBTAINED FOR ME PROJECT ALL RECORD INFORMATION FOR ICE DESIGN ITEMS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO ICE WITHIN Z BUSINESS DAYS OF ME COMPLETION OF ME WORK. 5) PLANS SUBMITTED AT ME END OF ME PROJECT SHALL BE REVIEWED FOR COMPLETENESS. ALL REQUIREMENTS LISTED ABOVE APPLY. 6) IF DESIGN FEATURES WERE INSTALLED EXACTLY PER ME DEIGN PUNS TIES TO THE FEATURE ARE STILL REQUIRED TO BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE OWNERS USE. ANY FEATURE NOT INDICATED AS DIFFERENT IN RED WILL BE CONSIDERED TO BE EXACTLY PER DESIGN. 71 RECORD INFORMATION SHALL INCLUDE BOTH VERTICAL AND HORRONTAL LOCATIONS. THIS INCLUDES BUT S NOT UMDED TO FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATIONS, RIMS AND NVERI OF STRUCTURES AND EMNG. INVERTS AT CROSSINGS, DEC 8) ANY UTILITIES ENCOUNTERED THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL BE ADDED 10 THE PLANS WEIR APPROPRIATE TES. 9) TES SHALL INCLUDE ALL UTILITIES INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR WHICH INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED 10 SEWER. WATER, STORM, ELECTRIC. CABLE TELEPHONE. GAS, DEC 10) RECORD DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUPPLIED ON BOTH HARD COPY AND ELECTRONIC DATA ELECTRONIC DATA SHALL BE COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN CAD) FRIES INCLUDING NATIVE FILE FORMAT (DWG). 11) THECONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT ON A WEEKLY BASIS PROJECT PHOTOGRAPHS. ME INFORMATION WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER IN ELECTRONIC FORMAT WITH EACH PICTURE BEING LABELED BY DATE, LOCATION AND ACTIVITY, AT A MINIMUM THE CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT PICTURES OF ALL THRUST BLOCKS. CONNECTIONS 10 EXISDNG FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES BEFORE AND AEER BACKFILL, PROVIDE AUXILIARY LIGHTING AS REQUIRED TO PRODUCE CLEAR, WELL -LIT PHOTOGRAPHS WITHOUT OBSCURING SHADOWS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ONE CHECK SE OF PHOTOGRAPHS AT THE SITE FOR REFERENCE, UPON REQUEST ME CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PICTURES OF VARIOUS AREAS DEEMED NECESSARY BY THE ENGINEER OR OWNER. 12) CES1 CATIONS BY THE ENGINEER AND SUCCESSFUL TEST RESULTS DO NOT REM VE THE CONTRACTOR O FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ME DESIGN PLANS SPECIFICATIONS AND PERMITS SHOULD A DEICIFNCT SE DISCOVERED AFTER SAID CERTIFICATION OF TESTING, DRAFT CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR CONTRACTOR & CLIENT/OWNER: 1 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS:THESE PLANS WERE PREPARED BY IRUDEFL CONSULTING ENGINH P' IND ARE INTENTEDTO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE STANDARD GENERAL CONDITIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT . TIC -ZOO PREPARED BY THE ENGINEERS IO�I. �r uiRACT DOCUMENTS COMMITTEE (EJCDC). LATEST EDITION COPIES A AT WRTjA.yAMBBI� FT WNNSPE ORGIEJCDC 2. UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS: ME LOCATION OF EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED BASED ON RESEARCH, UTILITY PLANS PROVIDED BY OTHERS, AND/OR SURFACE EVIDENCE AVAILABLE AND WERE OBTAINED IN A MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE ORDINARY STANDARD Of PROFESSIONAL CARE AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED BY ME OWNER OR THE DESIGN ENGINEER, 3, DIFFERNNGSUBSURFACEORPHYNCALCONDIDOW: IF CONTRACTOR BELIEVES THAT ANY SUBSURFACE OR PHYSICAL CONDITION AT OR CONTIGUOUS TO THE SITETHATISUNCOVERED OR REVEALED EITHER: (111S OF SUCH A NATURE AS TO ETABISH THAT ANY JECHNCAL DATA" ON WHICH CONTRACTOR REUED IS MATERIALLY INACCURATE: OR IT, IS OF $UCH A NATURE AS TO REQUIRE A CHANGE IN THE MANS/ CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, OR (3) DIFFERS MATERIALLY FROM 7-SHOWN OR INDICATED IN THE PLANS/CONTRACT DOCUMENTS; OR 1416 OF AN UNLTWL NATURE. AND DIEEERS MATERIALLY FROM CONDITIONS ORDINARILY ENCOUNTERED AND GENERALLY RECOGNIZED AS INHERENT IN WORK OF STET CHARACTER PROVIDED FOR IN ME PLANSICONTRACT DOCUMENT: THEN CONTRACTOR SHALL, PROMPTLY AFTER BECOMING AWARE THEREOF AND BEFORE FIRMER DISTURBING ME SUBSURFACE OR PHYSICAL CONDRIOM OR PERFORMING ANY WORK N CONNECTION THEREWITH (EXCEPT N AN EMERGENCY). NO- OWNER AND ENGINEER ABOUZ SUCH CONDTIION- CONTRAC,OR SHALL NOT FURTHER DISTURB SUCH CONDTION OR PERFORM ANY WORK IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (EXCEPT AS AFORE AIDE UNTIL RECEIPT OF WRITTEN ORDER TO DO SO. ALL PARTIES NVOLVED (OWNER. ENGINEER. ARCMIfKi. AND MUNICIPALITY IF APPLICABLE) SHALL AGREE UPON HOW TO PROCEED AND ANY RELATED COST IMPLICATIONS. 4 UTILITIES : PRIVATE AND PUBIC UTILITIES SUCH AS ELECTRIC. FELE EDIT E. GAS. CABLE FIBER OPTIC ETC, ARE IRE RESPONSIBILTY Of ME RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY, ANY INFORMATION SHOWN BY ICE SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PREUMINART (USUALLY TO ASSIST WITH PERMITTING). FINAL MUCH CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE ARE ME IMPORTS M OF RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES. COMPLIANCE WITH EASEMENTS AND REGULATIONS (STATE AND LOCAL) ARE THE RESPONSMINY OF RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY. 5. DIGSAFE:IN ACCORDANCE WITH VERMONT STATE LAW (VSA TITLE 3O CHAPTER 66 AND PSO RULE 3,8001 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO CONTACT DIGSAFE SYSTEMS, INC. 'DIGSAFE". AT LEAS Q HOURS. EXCLUDING SATURDAYS SUNDAYS, AND LEGAL HOLIDAYS, BUT NOT MORE THAN W DAYS BEFORE COMMENCING EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES, EXCEPT IN AN EMERGENCY. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PREMARKING THE SUE AND MAINTAINING DESIGNATED MARKINGS. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON DIGSAFE REQUIREMENTS SEE W W W.DIGSAFE.COM . THE TOWN OF ESSEX WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS ARE CONSIDERED A PRIVATE UTILITY AND ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE DIG$AFE SYSTEM. AS SUCH. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE TOWN OF ESSEX AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE COMMENCING WORK TO LOCATE ALL WATER AND SEWER UILLIDES WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS, 6. JOBSTTE SAFETY NEITHER ME PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES O TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCn, NOR THE PRESENCE OF ICE OR IT EMPLOYEES AND SUB CONSULTANT AT A CONSIRLICTCN SITE. SHALL REDEVE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND ANY OTHER ENTITY OF THEIR OBLIGATIONS, DUDE AND RESPON!RFUMES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO. CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS. SEQUENCE. TECHNIQUES OR PROCEDURES NECESSARY FOR PERFORMING, SUPERINTENDING OR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS O THE WORK OF CONSIRUCDON N ACCORDANCE WITH ME CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND ANY HEALTH OR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS REQUIRED BY ANY REGULATORY AGENCIES. ICE AND TIES PERSONNEL HAVE NO AUTHORDLY 10 EXERCISE ANY CONTROL OVER ANY CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR OR OTHER ENTITY OR THEIR EMPLOYEE$ N CONNECTION WITH THEIR WORK MAN HEATH OR SgfE1T PRECAUFFICI THE CLIENT AGREES THAT ME GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS $OEELY RESPONSIBLE FOR JOBSUE SAFETY. AND WARRANT THAT THIS RNIENI SHALL BE MADE EVIDENT IN THE CUENI'S AGREEMENT WITH ME GENERAL CONTRACTOR. ME CLIENT ALSO AGREE THAT THE CUE , TCE AND TCFS CONSULTANT SMALL BE NOEMNNED AND SHALL BE MADE ADDITIONAL INSURED UNDER THE GENERAL CONIRACIORS GENERAL LIANLTTY INSURANCE POLCY . Z. CODE AND STANDARDS COMPUANCEICE SHALL EXERCISE USUAL AND CUSTOMARY PROFESSIONAL CARE IN ITS PfiORTS TO COMPLY WITH CODES, STANDARDS. REGULATIONS. AND ORDINANCE IN EFFECT. THE OWNER ACKNOWLEDGE THAT SUCH REQUIREMENT MAYBE SUBJECT TO VARIOUS AND CONTRADICTORY INTERPRETATIONS. ICE, iHEREfORE. WILL USE ITS REASONABLE PROFESSIONAL EFFORT$ AND JUDGMENT TO INTERPRET APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS AS THEY APPLY TO THE PROJECT. ICE, HOWEVER, CANNOT AND DOES NOT WARRANT OR GUARANTEE THAT THE PROJECT WILL COMPLY WITH ALL INTERPRETATIONS OF SUCH REQUIREMENTS. 6. CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION: ICE MAY VISIT THE PROJECT AT APPROPRIATE INTERVALS DURING CONSTRUCTION TO BECOME GENERALLY FAMILIAR WITH THE PROGRESS AND QUALITY OF ME CONTRACTOR'S WORK AND TO DETERMINE IF THE WORK IS PRECEDING IN GENERAL ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENT, THE OWNER HAS NOT RETAINED ICE TO MAKE DETAILED INSPECTIONS OR IO PROVIDE EXHAUSTIVE OR CONTINUOUS PROJECT REVIEW AND OBSERVATION SERVICES. ICE DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE PERFORMANCE OF AND SHALL NOT HAVE RESPONSIBILITY FOR, THE ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF ANY CONTRACTOR, $LIB -CONTRACTOR. SUPPLIER OR ANY OTHER ENTRY FURNISHING MATERIALS OR PERFORMING ANY WORK ON THE PROJECT. ICE SHALL NOT SUPERVISE DIRECT OR HAVE CONTROL OVER THE CONTRACTORS WORK NOR HAVE ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR ME CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUE, SEQUENCES OR PROCEDURE OF THE CONTRACTOR. IF ME OWNER DESIRES MORE EXTENSIVE PROJECT OBSERVATION OR FULL TIME PROJECT REPRESENTATION, ME OWNER SHALL REQUEST SUCH SERVICE BE PROVIDED BY ICE AS ADDITIONAL SERVICE. 9. UTILITIES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE AND DO NOT NECIESSARRY REPRESENT ALL WRITES LOCATED DROP ADJACENT TO ME -SURVEYED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELO VERIFY ALL UNRY CONFLCT. ALL DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED 10 ME ENGINEER 10. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES NOT INCORPORATED INTO THE FINAL DEIGN ARE TO BE REMOVED OR ABANDONED M INDICATED ON THE PUNS. I I. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MANfAN AS BUILT PLANS (WITH TIE) FOR ALL UNDERGROUND UBLIDE THOSE PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED 10 THE OWNER ATME COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. 12. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR/RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS TON OR OFF THE SITE) AS A DIRECT OR INDIRECT RESULT OF THE CONSTRUCTION. 11. ALL GRASSED AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL FULL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 14. MAINTAIN ALL TREES OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, 15. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK NECESSARY FOR COMPLETE AND OPERABLE FACILITIES AND UDUDES. 16 IN ADDITION TO THE REQUREMENTS SET IN THEE PLANS AND SPECIFIC-0-, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL PERMIT CONDITIONS, LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS STANDARDS AND ALL CONSTRUCTION SAFETY REGULATIONS, I Z ANY MWAIERING NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF ME SREWORR SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS -TOT THE COHTRACI AND ' HALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S REPONS FIRDY, 18. IFTHERE ARE ANY CONFLICT OR INCONSISTENCIES WITH ME PUNS OR $P FRCATIONS. ME CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT ME ENGINEER FOR VEREICATION BEFORE WORK CONIMUES O ME DEM(SI IN QUESTION. 19. ALL SYSTEM COMPONENTS RANKS. PIPES, IO NMI SHALL BE WATERTIGHT, 20. CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST ANY POTABLE WATERLINE CROSSINGS AND CONSULT WITH ENGINEER IO MEEI REQUIREMENTS SHOWN ON ME DETAIL SHEET'WATER/SEWER CROSSING' DETAIL. 21. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION WITH ALL RELEVANT PARTIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO OWNER, ARCHITECT AND UTILITY COMPANIES) TO DETERMINE FINAL LAYOUT AND DESIGN. V DE OR AND CONSTRUCTION O PEDESTRIAN WALKS. RAMPS AND DECKS BETWEEN BUILDINGS AND PARKING LOTS IS PROVIDED BY THE ARCHITECT AND INCORPORATED INTO ME BUILDING DESIGN. 23. ALL CURB STOP VALVE TO BE NSIMLED WITH ACCESS COVER AT FINISHED GRAB. 24, ALLWATERUFFETAPSSHALLBELWETARS: EXMnN WATERLINEMUSTREPLANINSERVCEDURNGCONNECTION.UNLESSINDICATEDOMERWBE. Z. ROOF DOWFSPOMCAN CONNECT 10 ROOF DRAIN MAWFOLD (RDI M DETERMNED BY ARCHRECI AND OWNER. TABS CONNECDION TAPES INCLUDED AS PAR, OF THE DESGN PUN BUT NOTMOWN 10 ALLOW FLEXIBILRY IN LOCATION AS NEEDED. 26. THRUST BLOCKS FOR PRESSURE LINES NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. PROVIDE THRUST BLOCKS AT ALL BENDS. LEE AND REDUCES. PROJECT ENONEER IOOBSFRVE ALL THRIAT BLOCKS PRIOR TO BACKFRI 27. WATER MAN OPERATED AT HIGH PRESSURE. ALL BUILDINGS SHALL CONFIRM STATIC INTAKE PRESSURE AND PROVIDE PRESSURE -REDUCING VALVES AS DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE MECHANICAL ENGINEER (OR ARCHRECTI 28. $EWERCONNECDONS TO EXISTING MANHOLES SHALL INCLUDE WATERDGHTCONNECTIONS, REFORMING INVERT TO PROVIDE SMOOTH FLOW STREAM ANDTIESING TO ENSURE STRUCTURE IS WATERIIGHL. IF AN EXISTING MANHOLE IS FOUND NOT 10 BE WATERTIGHT Il SHALL BE EXPOSED AND REPAIRED ON THE OUTSIDE, PRIOR TO CONNECTING TO EESTING MANHOLES SUBMIT SHOP DRA WINGS ON CORE LOCATION, ANY REQUIRED PIPING (FOR DROP MANHOLES) AND CHANGE TO NVERI FORM. 29. FINAL RIMS OF SEWER MANHOLES AND WATER VALVES SHALL BE CONFIRMED AND COORDINATED WITH FINAL SITE GRADING, MINOR ADJUSTMENTS FROM DESIGN GRADE MAY BE REQUIRED BY OWNER OR ENGINEER AND SHALL SE INCLUDED. 30. ROCK REMOVAL WORK FOR BOULDERS UNDER 2.5 CUBIC YARDS S INCLUDED AS PART O EXCAVATION. ANY ROCK REMOVAL FOR 2.5 CUBIC YARDS OR GREATER SHALL BE TREATED AS LEDGE REMOVAL. 31 ME GENERALCONTRACTORISREOVIREDTOCONFORM TO THE SIRCTESI NTERPREATION OF THE CONTRAODRAWNG.SPECNCAIION.PERMIISANDCONSIRLICTIONCOWRACT ALL EARTH MATERIAL RECEIVED OR DISPOSED FROM OUTSIDE SOURCES SHALL COMPLY WIN APPLICABLE PERMITS AND RFGUU110NS. SHOP DRAWING SUBMITTALS SHALL INCLUDE CONTRACTORS CERTIFICATION STATEMENT O COMPLIANCE AND COME O RELEVANT PERMIT FOR OURroE SOURCES. 32. CONTRACTOR SMALL PAY TOR ALL REQUIRED TESTING. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO SO. MING, COMPACTION MI NG, SIEVE ANALYSE, CONCRETE TESTING, ASPH PENETRATION TESTING. BACTERIOLOGICAL MY FIG FOR WADER AND OTHER TESTING AS PART O STANDARD PRACTICE FOR A CONSTRUCTION PROJECT O THIS NATURE. UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE AND APPROVED BY THE OWNER. . Cki of �2t DRAFT ♦� tce -� TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS .rt R-P I WILLISTp KNORT oMRs em .11 .- F.- N., De-0- Dore BY Use of iMse DrpwGzgs I. Unles otncwise noted. Inese IXOwirps «e InrentleA T« TreliminarY pbnning, [ooNination ,THI Othor tlo' VX,_s w uTlliBes.OrW/w op«Ov. from Me regulatory outhorities. flay are not infentletl as construction dawings unless nofetl 2. ONY drawings spT,C&IK, m«Retl-f«CmnhC «e inlenFTetl re DQ used n conjwrCl'1ws With co 1-A docssmanlfi,,N if ohms. owner/cRR dis wlgreemeI aM fo be ENJ co«LLmretl v.Bno PdbdpRnI nJUNig Wt rat Gmired f0. ine ATGhilect. N pppiI-. IneW IXawngisnax not be rlsed l«CmiOpClion layout. Contact TCER anYc«nhuclian s«veyirq services«to oDimn elecfrorvc tlafa suitOlLe 1« coMnlctbn layout. 3. T Drawings Ore ORdtc to III Rgect Ontl ore not pnifemble. As inUrunronts of DNA-. -1. dlo Hgs. and Copies thereof. f«ni ,, by TCE pre its exclusive TCE It Y Cnangez to tFre dr.. dins -Only. nestle by SCE. It are di,, fad, tney THIN be wougnt to BIe oHenfbn of SCE immedbtely. 4. By use pf these GowlrsSD br construction of the Prgect. tM Owrser reprpi'enh Bpl prey have reviewed approved, Intl accepted the d,,WKY, F Ind hove met With aG applicoble pWwsfd'-s plines f0 insure These plarss we pipped, cwxdm«etl wiln other Ospeclz Ii Bre Protect- Ine o I area n and Amneer. «e responsiLNa I« am Lw&Xngs nchding a rneas«ed o mnI-five (S) feel wourM'Inv tPAW.lg. 5.11 h lfre Uiet's respon.R Y to arssue Ms copy contains BY, DT se, OF tiyo �^ No, 9020 CIVIL o iy F/g JINAt tE 0 For Permi'F ing Only 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington. Vermont SHeef ride Legend and Notes DOte: ,dl3Uli4 S',_ N/A Pnlject EXm ti14088 Drawn BY'. - NPC Mr 1 Es'.- AAC Approved By C1-Ol l � _ FT--------- i - - - KIMBALL AVENUE sMH I (ASSUMED INV) L°. \ I Rim=348.51 INSW 8 3 08 _.. WETLAND OUTLET M=3336 3x i�t) ^_.mow-----w-----w-- \ 3s4 IIN(3X3)=334.36 a 1 > 1 w c w V -- b I f !� SHARED USE PATH (l ye 1 MH 3 \ \ „ RIM 342 94 IN 15 STORMWATER SYSTEM - ! ) 335 30 N _mac i=334. 8 iOUT/181=335.12 4A \ i L _ F E � HDPF O - \ oar .- '>•" . t2"HDPEi DMH \ I t r f - RIM=339.45 \ o L V ` TIN=335.46 i iOUT=335.38 -- \ C8011 0 09 Q 11 � Ps� RIM=33719 \ I I } l2 HD E IN=334.02 a s fOUT(IB)=333.36 m iOUT(12)=334.19 1 SMH2 \ I TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC i Rm=344.83 LOT 3 iIN(8)=339.16 I - �ur i0Ul-339.06 WETLAND OUTLET LOT i=333.3H a aoa *- RIM X3")= 5 STORM WATER SYSTEM LOT 4 /{ 1 332.87 1-332.54DMH �A'n 68 / RIM=33339.63 CB #5 4N(81=334.34 - ! \ RIM=342.51 \ Ill 333. OS i0UT=33303 III / 4N 337 OUT=3364I1 - � - I i ail +Pi it Tjt• a� e.f. CB#6 111 I \ CB 010 RIM 343.77 / tl RIM-339.97 #N(72)=338.64 \\ TOUT=333.57 - 8N/4)=339.78 TO U T -33&28 t' s 1 EXISTING CURB ,�' - - - SMH5 i Rm=348.26 \ sop _ SMH3 -- - 'Al 4"PVC �i () tOU1 34083� 1 �aRf - --- CBNI OPFe /.-..-----w. _ R,m-343.49_ -12" E- -__.-_ -_ RIM=336.37 \��/ 1 -, 8"�IX5337.L4(iTE MAIN w dN-339.89 w -_--- € / as L--- t TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY Tr--- -- -°--- �� i(2)=333.82 ff \\! dN(8)=339.8Z \ DMHgI i 12'HDPE ) ° i0UT=333.59 wv -�--- iOUT=339.74 -- -- --- - I z o / > _ F 0 8" PVC- P. 8"PVC - 4' HYDRANT CLEAIOUT(TYP.) O },.\3�.-..--E�-.- -_-- 5!0 SMH4 RIM=34630;=312.59,3w UN(E)(8-34030EXISTING UIIHTY3CABINET -- -350 8"CLASS 52 WATER MAIN 1 IOUT=34030A EXISTING RETAINING WALL WITNESS i=341: 12a'\ TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONDUITS 'f, I° RIM= SSE MANHOLE ` f \- 124 TECHNOLOGY PARKWAY 4;RVC WITNESSES h 3434 T� a EXISTING 3 STORY BUILDING a t I EXISTING RETAINING WALL / I �j...., ' q ... 1 / 1 m ' 0 � NOV �, m 0i4 a-1�' City of So. %din ton F f ,` EASEMENTS NOT SHOWN FOR CLA�tITY. ` SEE EASEMENT PLAT SHI �R/ T' 3a LOTe auW6cscow DRAFT \ 1 30 0 30 60 90 120 4001*4 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS No. Oes ,.l IJale By Use of these -lgI i. UNess otherwve f the b iN geci fa prell-Pio,dsi II--lbtwthom a' mbsesw vlKhe of tend Ill mg l ry n may d uc'dr lgmess pored z Or4y IM-e pa plc ty ma4ad F C (non' ae ntendetl to De used - ryunclion M t dot°manic spat B[ Ions. / g e,rlenis arld to Ee luNY toad roied 'mt wl p4n cludirg bui r,otwreed io. ne Amta n ad ade pace TCE Id, s9pp rq be used( ommKt' layout. Concoct TCEfa anyclwn surreNtp to cbt� . d.1010df 3m, ro you ilm P - 9 Oe IM1c t lh Rojo rM not r a t m dto+^n 11 h-, f.i tad UyiCE '1 N CL Itty. Ch ge f �dtowl g 4 Illy b tl by iCE. t dMCouaeO they fiall be brought to me U 'not iCEimmadwroy 4. B of mesa drawl qs I h I f the RoleCt O«avrepreu Amo tIHYM d pproved a ccep+ed me dl-l9s Ildo t m 10 pd' ade pan /d ip nese do aoparlY o°rwwl m ina aux t a fact. tna Owrser astl Mt t spo Ibkl bu4dssgs lawn. inI: g d -- 11. 1511-1 orn besting. 5 B n the Users responsibNY io emote Brs capY contaim Me For PerrFi ing Only 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington, Vermont Existing Conditions Plan OMe: IU/3U„4 5atie ,-=3� Project Number 2014Q98 pawr�BY' NPC Ro 'Engineer: AAD Approved By: Cl -02 DRAFT / o t N/F CABLE HOLDCO EXCHANGE III. LLC N/F RUBY B. WILLIS FAMILY TRUST COMMPANYPANY N(F INVESTORS -._ - C CORP. OF V7. c KIMBALL AVENUE --. n _ - L—J A ; .i- — a0 SIDE WALK A SHAR - -=�^- /,— / TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC -- - -- - ' LOT 3 — — k. P -TflTflTTTF I I W Im ovEP.HED I; IPpw REASEI EM 25 UNDERGROUND I— — •\ "'� \ \1 ' ,'�,'E�SYS7EM t, L _ __ _-.. _.. __ OT 2 1 PROPOSED I � 1 \ ! ( �I PARKING __ I LOT 4 A: 2. N/F TECHNOLOGX l Jr it 21 _ 21 20 41 PARK PARTNERSi I - m IFTECHNOLOGY I _ V••\ \•\ \ I ARK PARTNERS _ t� LOT _ 0 - - U ._" A) s *I UIIIIlYFASEMEN! g I _'— — _ •\\ •\ `: .. -- 10' SEWER EASEMFM ' I .._... TECHNOLOGY PARK WAYS 1 PROPOSED I t ' r { I 1 124 TECHNOLOGY PARKWAY 3 STORY EXISTING 3 STORY BUILDING - I! t OFFICE BUILDING 1. T LAND i •.\ \1\ FFE=34&33 11 II ��,111� •v � ,� b r t el Al 7 1 \ \ vF 7ECHNo ,",1 LOT 6 I I I ='ARK PARTN"' v , �' \• \• t PROJECT INFORMATION: t i ,/ \• \ ! 9. PARKING LOT: 60.952 SF ? 1. OWNER/APPLICANT: TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS, LLC r t i 55 COMMUNITY DRIVE SUITE 4D2 10. PARKING LOT ISLANDS: 6,923 SF (11,36%) 1 t SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT OS403 PHONE: (802) 860-1691 17 TRAFFIC ITE TRIP GENERATION 9TH EDITION ' t _ PM PEAK TRIPS 2. TAX PARCEL ID: 0436-00030.03 1.12z+78.45=140TRIPS 3. DEED REFERENCE: V. 898 p. 210 SLIDES 510,541 12. WATER DEMAND: 200 EMPLOYEES x 15 GPD/EMPLOYEE = 3000 GPD 4, PARCEL SIZE: 3.98 ACRES 13. SEWER DEMAND: 200 EMPLOYEES x 15 GPD/EMPLOYEEx 0.8 = 2400 GPD 5.20NING DISTRICT: MIXED INDUSTRIALICOMMERCIAL 14. BUILDING HEIGHT: MAX = 35 FT, PROPOSED = 50 FT; ; t / 50'-35' = 15 WAIVER, SEE SETBACK CALCULATION" 6. BUILDING SIZE: 54,459 SF 14. SETBACK CALCULATION: IC MIN INCREASE' PROVIDED MIN FRONT: 50 FT Ix15-15' 65 FT LOT 14 I. \ - 7. PARKING SPACES: PROVIDED: 3.511000 SF= 191 SPACES (OFFICE) 194 SPACES SIDE: REAR 10 FT 0.5 zi5' =7.5' 17,5 FT 30 FT 1 15'=15' 45 8 ACCESSIBLE SPACES 8. LOT COVERAGE: al BUILDING: EXISTING 0% PROPOSED 10.47% 0 S.F. 18,152 S.F. b) OVERALL (BUILDING & PARKING) EXISTING 8,94% PROPOSED 57.44% is,S.F. 99,5B3 S.F. c) FRONT YARD (KIMBALL AVENUE) EXISTING 17.267 PROPOSED 17.26% 29,923 S.F. 29,923 S.F. x FT 15. REFER TO EASEMENT PLAT FOR DETAILS ON EASEMENTS. ... n, Soy 110'110-0n Graphic Scale DRAFT Feet 50 0 50 100 ISO 200 tce TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS ♦)8 elAHt PAPo( ROAD I MWSTUN. 413tMONT 05495 ABM fi331 i TfEvrCOM IN U f Tn Drawmgs . U 1 tnerwae oared mere Dt gs tended I., IF—' plbn rtMw.h wa dTe tksdpknesa axes. a/« pPrO 1 n me reg�b «v n«It es. me of im a d hucl � wv,g rxess rtolea n. 2. OrdY Cranirgz spn itcnlIy k d " C st -o bra '�.. nfended Io be used o.quncT m n r Mdh, be 1pAsPecificat / f g menh b y cb«d ed to Qr In a pt - luairtg bN rplNrmledr tt Artful t t P 1' bl Th Drawings stwtl not be sedr hu r I Y f. Contact TCE la anyconshucxon surveying t blam alecvbrac darn so rase r«consm, l 1 v 1. 3. TM Dmw pecW t the P I d e opt N i bk Ail I t t .lh tl gs. and op here t b ed by hTCE t 5 e ProPalY ertprs a —6tlr g Y b de by TCE. 1 a 4 hey —11 be brought Ib Me attehtmh of TCE' red' tery. ,. eBY pm of these d Mi f« 4uctiar Pf Ine'P eO, rn Owner rePre t mot meYM d Gaoved. Pnd PccePled h-z gs d o 1 I A oppicabie panes/d Eli t n p properly caa6rw tl In Hre P f I x % jecr. The O nd Ar r. p bl f ybuAtl gs bag d r (sl reef d buaang. 5. 11' cne U ,, p nvb'ty to ensure tns copy contains the OD O�4i�� For Permng Only Proiecr line - 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington, Vermont Overall Site Plan Dore: to/3ona _-- Pmjecl Number 201 a088 apBy. NPC Project Engineer: AAD Apwo�ea sy: �b fin�F C2-01 FT K)M$ALL AVENUE SMHII (ASSUMED -- DRAFT -- - ---n - ---` FT / Ri, 348 5 i1NISW)(8 358.08 ('�,p A TOUT 3.f7.48 __-°---� -c -- 352 M CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY UTILITY - /-u.- �� LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS PRIORTO TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUSLLC -- -w-- --„ ry WETLAND Oi1RE7 �'�., �.LT_�---� CATCH BASIN SUBMITTAL/FABRICATIONI3_,.,-w-__--w-----w-- \ .. -_. / _ RIM 336.35 �/ �_ ./ T _-.-,J - ,� LOT 3 i INf3X3 /=334 36 e '� 1 ''� l �'T ss, �. 398 ACRES \3at '.H/ 334.16 _ CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY UTILITY ,y •D a SEE DETAIL SHEET C8.04 3gd LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO 1 M 9 t I 3555�w SHARED USE PATH - t_ I CATCH BASIN SUBMITTAL/FABRICATI To 4 / FOR MODIFICATIONS 33.. 1=334.58 ` 342,94 l ,�^ {1 / � 5 -c r - - - -- -312151 _ \ / 3S STORMWATER SYSTEM 35 30 / 35,1 �- o \ �_ _' - 133< F 3 ? S 44 I y _ �35,1 _ L[J/ 02 - T 334349 EDP - Op 5 �� C.O. SNOW STORA E \ n------ P �' vi � T-44 ,--_. � i-343 80��i t If �_ f � 1 P\��HDPE #PE E5T AN .C.O. �t \ `'� 1 p.. CROSSINGSIGN4l Is344.b9 DM'H _ I \ " I'`;, RlM=33945 \\ p$ URB POLE -MOUNTED e I !</ 0 ilN=335.46 1---- , I f' -- _, „ LED LUMINAIRE OU7=335.38 PAVEMENT JOINT r i \il tSEE DETAIL) ce It , '� i.+•3-3 ___ Owl I ( STRIPED CROSSWALK 1 I S 'TS"NDPE CB#3-2 u -_� l RIM=337_19 iIN 334.02 I _ / iOUT(12)-.334.19 SMH 2 l 1 Q nN(81'339 la (, \ I I I l _mow` ` � I T01_11-339 G6 WE.LOT FLAND OUTLET - U ` \ RIM=334,35 STORMWATER SYSTEM i=33338 o J pop I I 3✓e\. '"""- -- - i � I IN(3x31=33287 LOT 4 _. � \ m � I �' \ C o. � fi �.0. I cl t � -.;32.2 END OF CURB a \ DMH #8 -.- i1N(8)=33434II 1 CB #5�� __ __ FUTURE EY r I 4N(12)=33308 \ I ! A R7M=342.S1 " TOUT=33303 w J i1N=337.01 Sys V -- -CHARGING \ ��\ oor ?/ TOUT=336.4 i E , 5 -I \ I;.l _ -_- AP A :._-- STATIONS _ FUTURE PHASE 2 CONCRETE J M1 SIGN (TYP.) GENERATOR MD I( . \ o•r' C846 CB #10 RIM=34377 7 I ! RIMw339.97 I'. ` ss '? ) IIN(12)=338 6d I .42 5 CB #3 6 t I I � i i0UT=333.57 4N14J� 339 IS l ��}, CB #3-4 75" HDPE �a PCB #3 5 C � i3 0 i o.P7 i0'JT 33828 l I1 TS"HDPE e SMH' i i I I poO IIN(NEW 12)m338.b4 ^_ :: �: 'i , Rm 3A8.26 O rc - - S -3av OJT 340.$3 = CB#4 ,v pf("o ,.�--w--_--w. Pom +34349 W {__. _- -- - _ l RIM=33G.37 _' Sry / > 3k-, ---: 8"�A"S3'S2:(TE MAIN iW-339.89 - _�I`' AwcUT" - _} - --- -- 4 l / I - .. -) s `c i TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY - -- ==- - - ---- F I(2)='333.8'L o / e IN(8!'=339.82 x / s DN ' we --- IOUT-.333.59 _/_-� 7 \ OUT=33974 c. spo -„: _ CB #3.7 . -'.., = G D�tOP CURB AND _ _ V AN .� iT ACCESSIBLE ENTRY F tiv.R - I_' CLE-A U7/1YP.) �nuE S g PEDESTRIAN CROSSING i O -. 1---�--�-•-�� - -_ 151 '•/ I � E °y RIM-SMH4 346,3 itNjE)(8) 34n30e .,PROPOSEb PAD M_ 34v 4 ar' 8" CLASS 52 WATER MAIN ---w-r -_»- w, WITH BIKE RACKS I r*.i l O EXISTING STORM WATER EXISTING RETAINING WALL � ` � / �I I U \ ALTERNATE/ADDITIONAL � - y'D NAME RIM iiN i0(Ji TYPE RODE DRAIN CONNECTION ) I 149 I� ( DMH # I 347.43 340 50 340 S3 N/A SEWER SERVICE TO EXISTING STUB [ CONNECT ROOF DRAIN I Ai PLtA.SE MANHOLE - - --- / �` b' RIM 34o,2q i24TECHNOLOGY PARKWAY -� i-341.70 I I l• PROPOSED our=34z 7z 1' I 34z 53 EXISTING SSTLiRY BUILDING�' FIBER OPTIC CONNECTION 3STORY 8"WATER SERVICE 1 I OFFICE BUILDING i0UT=342.63 : DROP CURB UPPER SLAB FOOTING FFE=348.33 EXISluwRrAINIrC ', 1. I DRAINELE)Y=343t BFE=336.25 J PROPOSED SIDFN A'K e \ ! v \ y - ----- p - _ l P6RHIGN BRICK WALL SCREEN IN - _. � , ♦.. { - -L l 3' K_ LOT 3 PROPOSED STORMWATER NAME RIM IIN TOUT _ TYPE IS' HDPE IN 344.25 N/A 344.25 N/A CB #3-7 344.75 339.44 339,34 B CB #3-6 348.71 N/A 345,96 B CB #3-5 347.10 343.93 343.83 B CS #3-4 344.23 340-10 340.00 B CB #3-3 349.81 N/A 339.76 B CO #3-2 346.13 336.96 33686 B CB #3-1 345.00 336.03 33593 18" HDPE OUT 334.58 334.58 N/A n - YD#2 346.75 N/A 34375 JYARDj YD#1 347,70 343.00 342.90 YARD DRaN c g is t I � \ \ 1 i_ f i l ^ �\ /_ =341.00 N aJX I NOTES: OUTDOOR PATIO _ ! � 1. POWER AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS. I , PEDESTALS AND CONDUITS TO BE FINALIZED BY g N p ELECTRIC CONTRACTOR. .n• ,.; c l I" 2. FOOTING DRAINS PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. - COORDINATE WITH MEP DRAWINGS 3, LIGHT POLE LOCATION FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. SEE LIGHTING PLAN R FINAL HEIGHT AND ' t LOCATION. DISCREPANCIES HALL BE BROUGHT O ' THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER. 4, CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PIPE SIZES PRIOR TO LOT 6 (. ORDERING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. DRAFT I Graphic Scaie DRAFT Feet 30 0 30 60 90 -- 120 TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS ,m uL Ir9 «;s i www iaN yCR T Oaa� No Des,.np_on volt By Use of These Draw g, 1. thYess omelwa t d. ih D a 9 I d d Iq ge6en' ry Pba Isg oN'usal' -f t a gill s q ntl? Pqo dk m g h tei. lh1 IlnlerW a fry t dl..Ogs inofetl h. 2. Only tli pet fi Ily mark a F C it lion' are ' rued r be pled i r m r a Pec Ec lions / tra 9 nts ar bel Iry oord ed 'mom a ipli 'nclptling b I' tea IM A- -I. R aPPr bl The. p gs ihd nal be edf ans#pct' b-1, Contocr TCE fq ymg t oblain ekc#onic tlalas I. coraVp i yopr 3 These Drawings are s ft to ih Proje I arW are not liamlemde. As 1 i ih Wrw.i tgs, ana copes ihareot -fired W ICE pra'ls excl y by TCE If ftY. Changes ro ihed hgs MY ba nwd, a ea e TCE they fiall De brought fo the arfenfionsof lCE- d f ty. 1. By pie or #vie [Ya 'rlgs f nsfrucfion of the Project, Ilse Ovmerraprese r Msal il�eyh ve iOv ewatl opgoved ana accepted the d d hove met w th all ppl obl p afield pl t are ffiese plonsare goparl d.,d d me ospevlt o(me Raleal. The Own daM f Spo.-lq nny bultlngs h I tl B d a m amum rlve (5)1ee1 nd y b Id' g. 5 osI c U er bilify to ens tri s aOpy c ,Jdns lha 3y� 4p For Permit;g Only 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington, Vermont Site Plan Dafe: 1013Ufia Proect Number: 2p14C88 E m BY NPC 1p 1Eagmeer: pgovetl By MD C#2 = 02 51 { CURB AND SIDEWALK TO BE REMOVED 1 / 1 ) LOT y LOT 4 wS ) L � / i S / � � �;; � I )Y • TEMPORARY PIPE � ) \p t mY I m\ ` REMOVE CURBIN I RI REMOVE CURBING. li.r S TBT TBT TIT TIT TBT /1 TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY . - _ CURB AND SIDEWALK t TREE TO BE TRANSPLANTED (ttP.) CURB AND SIDEWALK "--- -"-'-- '-"'— - TO BE REMOVED TO BE REMOVED _ _ _ TBT T57 TBT TBT TBT Tilt" 7BT PROPOSED LFIBERO"ICCONNECTION 3STORY(OFFICE BUILDING FFE=348.33 BEE=336.25 4p �- SILT FE CE (APPORARY ROXIMATE IMENTLOCATION) POND (APPROXIMATE LOCATION) � LOT I � I 1 I I DRAFT ;' I 11 ." .,cr'EMBER, 2012;TYPICAW EPSC Legend DRAFT n SE LIMIT --o--o— .-RRIERTARE SRT FENCE OSOR _. STOCK WLE STONE CHECK DAM O-El PROTECTION SCE STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ® SEDIMEMTRAP TEMPORARY VEGETATED DIVERSKJN SWAIE LOT 5 5 r/ F I) THE SMALLEST PRACTICAL AREA OF LAND SHALL BE EXPOSED AT ANY ONE TIME 2) EROSION AND SEDIMENT COMBO! MEASURES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY EARTH MOVING OPERATIONS, 31 CONTRACTOR AND/OR OWNER OR APPOINTED DESIGNATE) SHALL INSPECT ALL EROSION CONTROL FEATURES M LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AND AFTER ANr STORM EVENT GENERATING RUNOFF FROM THE SITE. II AFTER VEGETAIION HAS BEEN FULLY ESTABLISHED. ME TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED. 5) PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL MATTING ON ALL DITURBED SLOPES WITH A PITCH OF 3H:1 V OR GREATER 6) EXCAVATION AND PIPE INSTALLATION SHALL BE AVOIDED DURING PERIODS OF SIGNIFICANT PRECIPITATION. >I ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES AND VEGETATVE STAWLIIATON SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOW RISK SITE HANDBOOK F� SIpE{pgEN-�ON AND SEDIMENT CONTROL LA,NR W, v! EROSION CONTROL NOTES AgtoY r. Graphic Scale DRAFT Fee/ 30 0 30 _-� - 60 90 --- 120 III -tce *100* TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS IJ8 9AR PARK ROAD I 11R1L51d. YFHfONT 65185 B01 BT9 fi33f i YIWW.It£VKC011 Renvoess Na. Descriplian Dale By se or rne.eo- � Udess olhererwi 1 Mese D g ended br p r t Hes ra/try/w b appar9roval-from the tumor l,then uihomer d'oapdill or regulatory m not nrended as constrocHon aawin9s vole noted h. T. Odv drpvnn9s K ly mph tl F C ihucfan" we tented fo be used' ry coon 'M c! tlpocumentf,b vMM Spe fic Bwn. mft, 9reemenh tl be IUAy coprlmpletl pM l p . incNart9 WI rot FWted1 MAroM 1.Xoppllc bk 1Hete Pav+rcgs MaF no Ix usedt conhucM10 b ur. Contact ICE la orN comh Hon urveyirq odes hatic dab - del M1u byou. 3. These Oravmg Kc I. fh P,—I d ®e not fr f ble tN fsen t davnrgls.wW copies Bsee f.f txdW a t hnaperty. Ch ges f the ❑ gs 1.only be r,ld, k,y TCE. 11 Le brought to m n Ron oncE' sed' lely. 4. B oP mere a 'rK151 onshuahon of the Prgect. me oyner repro h m tnay rave revlawed. apnoved. p epred the aaMrtg d h t m u cWI Isle opn /dhCwL M pb d ed n >e<r. Toe O.me NCMt t o f rr uK Wang sw tl - rtro (571ee1 tl Bang. 5 1. 1Ilse Users pon'b1lHr to eru d copy contain Fre c+rem re-yrsioru °; For PermiiE ing Only 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington, Vermont Demolition and EPSC Plan Phase I Dole: _ tone,! Scde. _ 1'=30 Wojecs Number _ 'I(IIID69 _ _ Deavm By: Rgect Engineer: AAD Approved By: -_.. Field Book: ...._..— --. C0**5 - 0 1 KEY DRAFT SCIENTIFIC NAME PLANT LIST COMMONNAME OUAN. SI2E COMMENTS AR Ace, rub— Red Maple 2 21/21J' 88B Red SUnseF AC AmeNmehieaeanad—M Selaieebem 8 6-6 BBB SINGLE STEM CR Go— Facerrrose Gray Dogwood 6 2 gel. CONT. CSI C-- send Red -twig 12 39.1. CONT. 'IsanV Dog .vhd N Ilex kedk:RIota Jm DendV LK Bany Nice 11 3 gel CONT ,Ern Dandy LK Berry Nice' W.Merberry GTS GleWt,,. fnarant/ws Shadenmstar 32 2 1/2"-3" BBB Shad—Slae HDneyloce.I .MBH JUIVI—s trod-. Creeprg Juniper 322 2 gal. CONT. Ear Harbor FP Figi,—Uula Fui Mead —Weer 157 2 gel. CONT Venusta MSA Abby sa 'di, Sargent Crabapple 6 2 1/2"-3" BBB PC Pynls callaryane CleLeland Select Pear 8 2 1/2" 3' B&B 'Chanicleer PG Plceee glauca While Spnrce 3 6-71 R&B PIN Paws nig,a Awtnan Pine 3 6-T ELKS PS Paws strobus Whhe Pine 5 6-T BBB CM Ghnww palustns Pin Oak 15 TRANSPLANT FROM ALONG TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY SKIS Spasm nrppprrrra SrRANns« nd Sprea 84 3 gel. cow. SrlwxtwuM SR Synnga rewwata Japanese Tree Lilac 18 21/2'-3" B&B SJS Spiraea Japmica Shirobene Spimea 29 3gal. CONIT. 'Shirobarla' TC Taxus cuspalta .bpanese Yew 118 18'-24' CONT, Rana TOS Thuja accrdeMalrs 'S—agd' S—gjUl Ad—tae 9 5-6 88B Owa ylPp Y LAYER SHREDDED BARK MULCH q 0 ✓' m ITO N APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) OVER PERMEABLE WEED FABKaNOI PLACE CLOSE rO ® MAIN STEM -30 :"SAUCER Run ` 4 BACKFILL WITH EXCAVATED MAT FINAL, IF SOIL ISPREDOMINATELY CLAY OR GRAVEL INCORPORATE ORGANIC MATERIAL AS DIRECTED AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PLANT Pn WIDTH 3X NOTES: _-- - BALL DIA 'PLANT SHRUB Al SAME DBiN AT WHICH SHRUB HAD PREVIOUSLY GROWN 'LOOSEN, CUT. B REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1 /3 OF ROOT BAU 'SHREDDED BARK MULCH AND WEED BARRIER FABRIC TO BE CONTINUOUS WHEN USED IN BEDS. i $ BALL AND BURLAP SHRUB NOTES" STAKE ONLY N EXTREMELY Wo) WINDYCONWIONSASAPPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ' IF KNOWN. PLANT THIN BARKED TREES ,,,QJ MES WITH MESAMESLM �Ipps �i' YPROPYON W WRAP WITH POLYPROPYLENE WRAP 0101MO, ' BURLAP: LOOSEN, CUT, 6 REMOVE NATURAL 'M`w'W,"EVYr'rsUWWC,LF��TA\- BURLAP FROM TOP 112 OF ROOT BALL. 01 -.1 REMOVE SYNTHETIC BURLAP ,M 'CURE BASKETS: CUTAWAY BOITOMTHENR THEN REMOVE REMAINIY WIRFE REMAINING WIRE ' PLANT TREE 10 EXPOSE ROOT FLARE. MAIN ORDER ROOT. AND IN SAME ORIENTATION AS TREE WAS GROWN. W NOT PLANT TOO DEEP T DIA - T LAYER SHREDDED BARK MULCH MULCH RING AP AR HI APPROVED BYLANDSCAPE A IJ OVER PERMEABLE WE - d"CLEPRArvCE FABRIC. DO NOi PLACE NEXT aRIC. TREE TRUNK i� SLOPEGROUND TO DRAM \` !:AUGER RIM DIG IREEPIT ONLY AS d� DEEP AS ROOT BALL k-'- BACKFILL WITH EXCAVATED MATERIAL.IF SOIL B PREDOMINATELY CLAY OR GRAVEL PLANTPT WIDTH -. _.. INCORPORATE ORGANIC MATERIAL AS r�R�1 3X BA.I DIA. V v` tk EPLANTING DETAIL DIRECTED AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Y 4` BOULDERS 3 PG .Spb l 41V SCSI 6CR 4 ul _t T 3 MSA LX�J EXIST. EVERGREENS � � 1 � � �, � 2 OP m LJ `IXJ� .6,., " - EXIST. EVERGREENS x Y SNOW STORA Ills 4 PS 2 AIR ! ! r 2 GTS 2 GTS 1 "y r f :Y. 8 GTS O O { 1 i I l / f'6 v 1 i A N 16 SJS (PHASE II); 2O►m s, 24 SNS I E f T C - 2AC l > ITS ) Y 4D SNS 3:1 ,tat asr 3TOS 3 TOS 4 AC ° IB SNS ----- 10 GTS DRAFT �Lt•i 1,,)!1 S.�h. �„y,�,Ti Cdi CLM V.43J � G aphis Scale DRAFT Feel 30 -- _ 0 30 - _ 60 90 120 ♦� -tce - ,%,slop TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS {� BI.IIR PALM ROAD I RKLSw VFIIYDNT 6s1% 802 BH W, I TNBN.10EVf.CIRI a — No. Des w, Dvle By use oTlnese D—Yw M I lxYessonlerwh fed. Mere Drawing n dsdw ipi for p N' ry plpn ' e ooranmi«, M m nes « IT ntl/« p hom Me B ry tarn figs. m not mr. dd nsYmctm Brow ngs unless noted a:,ucn. 2. Onry drwmgs spe—o ly T— "F,, ConsM,cYmn^ «e leraed m be org nC11on m ocr dacumenh. spa fic lions owner/ h agreemenh and M t>e wnr d'nwetl w;m nerdpEnes, rlckrdirg D,It .not tlmlled IHe ArtMtecl,B Pw de.l, ICE f.gs y.0, iba sed l« jnU., Y taroef. Contact ICE I« any .,. it_ svrveyirg to obtain ekchdrkC data w fade 1« conch I y t. 3 Inese Pawmgs «e —Inc ton RojoorM Trot M1anfemble. As Ylshpmenis of semc Ih d awiyx antl owes n«col f -nedbr CE eihexcl bY Cperfy. on9e %netl Bs may WY be matleby TCFTCE- It tlBco ed nMV mall be brought fo M R fono ICE' media y. By of ine d l. g trn conshvchon of the Foiacf. Yne Owner req I. — He fro d, approved. antl.—Pletl M I icade O w'cg` a t T a0 Opppod /tl O - 0— antl flies want are cd tl sp me olecl. lne Owner Ncn' t sponieble y WAQngs mown.' WdInB eoHned o m durum rve I:l Iee1 nd b dnB. :. It' cne lh« s s pon biN y t em,rce fns copy COnfalns Me DRAFT For Permitting Only 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington, Vermont SnePt.. Landscaping Plan Dale: --_ _ U/30/14 Score: __ 1,.=30 P—C, Number: 2o14088 _ —BY: NM — Approved By: Hord Ll -01 { DRAFT 1l� i ro _ yE t, 3Y .I ft 1 T.00 y.S 2 t y i.r, o y •� _ _. a 0 // 6 yh LU a-fi .� .oa .. e ti 3aylp ti? ro. ' .Sea 'a 5 9 t) 1. rtq ` 2 .2. • �. 2 ' .4 6 Y.5 S/ 6 % 1, a A 0.) 4 5 NOTES: 1. LIGHTING LAYOUT AND ANALYSIS PROVIDED BY M.E.I. VERMONT. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS- I T 2yj % Y "q 1 l t r.. 2. DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THIS PLAN AND OTHER ELECTRICAL, SITE, OR ARCHITECTURAL PLANS .�y, q 5 L „ 1� ] F Y 5 I t t -2u Y S. .. v e- bn •c;.c SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO ORDERING FIXTURES. ♦ < ;_- , C 7� n" �,%Aak U'a�,Y' 2 � 3, e 1'E .. S v Y _i. ro " ,o. 3 ,,2 ° o 4 �.\ ! a(T?\ '1 .4 � �-' '' h .3 5 1 ��2a.E - h 't2 C.1 b J• bC T \ \ V Z. l �4 7 2 r � r� .�a t Luminolre Schedule Symbol Oty label Anongement Description b.c 1 J,o t 3 Al SINGLE EMM-B04-LED-El-5W0-SR-FL.FG/20'AFG f --� 4 A2 BACK -BACK 2-EMM-B04 LED E7 5W0-SR-FL-FG/ 20' AFG PROPOSED 2 t o L L V o 5 B SINGLE EMM-1104 LED El SLI SR FL FG/ 20' AFG 3 STOR1fn� to ♦ 4 C SINGLE EMM-B01 LED El $L3/ 12 AFG OFFICE BUILDING 1 U SINGLE EMM-BOI-LED-El-SL4/ 12 AFG - 7 F1 SINGLE 301-IOLED5741/GROUND MOUNTED a FFE-348.33 14 W4 SINGIE EMM-BOI-LED-El-SL4/WALL MTD ll'AFG .,a, b 1, bE STATISTICS •�,. �` ,- a 5 - p r i 5 ly 1 - r+3� jj PARKING LOT AREA _ Blumimnce (Fc) Average-1,70 ,. ,�9 _i `' Maximum.4.7 }-�-- Mini mum:OS o.2 " .1 b i b a ° /' e y.\.� .n.e •u.l ,,.00 °o ` b l.t. Avg/Min Rath-3.40 Max/Min Rollo: TAIT DRAFT 30 0 DRAFT C E INE ;it j of So. Burlington Grap"'a Scale DRAFT Feet 30 60 90 120 ted 4 -. TRUDELL CONSUL LING ENGINEERS a�N euw vnrNr Nnw � ssE aanE os.sN usrgn XUl N)a fi511 I WNW.I T:v1.00Y p wings f,errnse no,eo these p -rgs rMtl la Plo ry g. coatlrpl on - - ipenesIX / ppova hom 1,»r g M 1h - tlea as comevc' tr g ss roles 2.0 I, d, ng I>e f II Karl f. L 1 t' "we d tl1. b a ry I Ma I pe Il t' , g enls a b I N tl tl Mar C' G UNng W k he 'f PCBc ae. fie Lx'rtg M pe real b Cor•ftl<I CEI yvg ob b - tla bMi lion kry `. rtese pa A, spec( be II M rrol f ble hU f n 1 tr ngs. w,0 - 11 netlb ICE 'h proPerh. Cb gas otr Bs av 011ebe tl b ICE. I b I b b< gnl ro rr,e tl r i eb. cE - a raH. R 1 iM1ere G 4 f do 1 I,e Roletl. Own eprese a 1 M1a Pp ed ra eP rt,e o- e na 1twt a ,pp- 0 onv b�aa r,g m.«'s the UsersVesponstbFN to ens,ne Irk cop, c-1— Ina DRAFT For Permitting Only 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington, Vermont Lighting Plan Dole: 'a/br.a 5 ae: I 3J Pt, oar. zolaoaE U By AAD — xpnoea sy: — Bela eook L2-01 1 { C +' P P �1�'R' REATED Pas oR I 48ENpS SEED AND MULCH, OVERFILL FOR IGREASSIF AREASI PAINTED BLUE SETLEMEM - BACKFILL FREE OF ORGANIC OR PRO.; 24` FORPAVRDp FOR GRASSED MATERIAL. COMPACTED TO M DENs SIANpARD PROCTOR IN GRASSED AR! GRAVELS RFA U CES 4 AREAS GSLOPE WHENHEN DEFIER E%CEEDS 5' DEPTH EXCEEDS cc•'T 'I' I II BACKFILL MATERIAL TO MATCH STRUCTURAL ROADWAY GRAVEL, SEt !� ti4 III t ✓. ROADWAY SECTION. COMPACTED T<: O -FYI 1 1 95% Del STANDARD PROCtOR ALL BACKHLL TO BE COMPACTED IN a INS Ii• — I—L 17 OF SELECT BACKPLL FREE O1 G ORGANIC OR FROZEN MATERIAL E ? I ;{,{tll f COMPACTED 1. 1. DENSITY STAHL),11. O O� I PROCTOR IN GRASSED AREAS DETECTABLE METALLIC WARNING TAPE LABELED`WATER" o WHERE 6 OF COVER CANNOT BE MAINTAINED. COVER WATER MAN WITH _ r INSULATION ROAM ME MINIMUM T- D T (CAL INSULATION BOARD AT ALL ROAD CROSSINGS AND WINN ROAD ALIGNMENT. EP ND STYROFOAM 10' BEYOND ROAD IN BOTH DIRECTIONS NOTES: d I. LENGTH OF OPEN TRENCH SHALL BE KEPT TO A MINIMUM, 2. R UNSUITABLE MATERIAL IS REMOVED WATER MAIN BELOW BEDDING, REPLACE WITH MATERIAL pSEE SITE PUN FOR INSTALL FRENCH DAM N APPROVED BY ENGINEER AND COMPACT IPE SIZE B MATERIAL( TRENCH TO PREVENF to 1S%MAKMUM.—. 3/4" CRUSHED STONE OR GROUNDWATER MOVEMENI 3. NO MECHANICAL TAMPERS SHALL BE USED IN THE PIPE BEDDING. 100' DIRECTLY OVER PIPE 10INSURE PIPE IS NOT SAND BEDDING SPACING MAKIMUM DAMAGED. a. BEDDING TO PROVIDE FIRM, STABLE, .a. TYPICAL WATER TRENCH CONTINUOUS AND UNIFORM SUPPORT FOR THE FULL LENGTH OF PIPE. Y NONE: FOR MUNICIPAL CONNECTIONS CONTRACTOR TO APPLY TO TOWN WATER DEPARTMENT FOR WATER INE TAPPING PERMIT, CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT COMPLETE SPECIFICATION OF MATERIALS WITH PERMIT APPLICATION, IF PRIVATE WATER SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE ALL EFFORTS WITH OWNER. _k TYPICAL TAPPING VALVE CIS FOR GRASSED SEED AND MULCH, AREAS OVERFILL FOR SETTLEMENT FOR GRAVEL p PAVED SURFACES I ,( GRADE AT T:I SLOPE WHEN DEPTH IXCEEDS S' z0 - -- BACKHLL FREE OF ORGANIC OR FROZEN MA'.. COMPACTED TO M DNN STANDARD PK'A: zz GRASSED AREAS < o - ALL BACKFILL TO BE COMPACTED IN 6 LIFTS A vf' // BACKFILL MATERIAL TO MATCH STRUCTURAL ROADWAY GRAVEL SEE ROADWAY SECTION. COMPACTED TO DENSITY STANDARD PROCTOR O O O INITIAL IT a SELECT BACKPLL FRET: OF ORGANICOP o�Lo FROZEN MATERIAL COMPACTED TO95%DENSFYY STANDARD PROCTOR N GRASSED AREAS DETECTABLE METALLIC WARNING TAPE LABELEDWHERE 101 SEWN✓ a j % SEWERM'NCOVER CAN NNSBEMNNIAACE COVEN 7✓ p o --•--✓r-- SEWER MAIN WITH T'RIGID INSUUtION. PLACE INS ll. �p O AT ALL ROAD CROSSINGS. EXTEND STYROFOAM ID' 6 ` o�M O BEYOND ROAD IN BOTH DIRECTIONS SEWER MAN ISEE SITE PLAN FOR SITE B PIPE MATERALS: CLASS I BEDDING 314' CRUSHED SCONE BACKPLL NOTES. I. LENGTH OF OPEN TRENCH SHALL BE KEPT BACKFILL ke 1 1,11TO A MINIMUM. ]. IF UNSUTIABLE MATERIAL 6 REMOVED HAUNCHNG _ .• . ' BELOW BEDDING, REPLACE WITH MATERIAL APP ROVED BY ENGINEER AND COMPACT BEDDING TO 5% MAXIMUM DENSITY. NOMECHANICALIAMPERSSHALLBEUSEI' DIRECTLY OVER PWE TO 11011 PIPE 6 NO' DAMAGED. �NSiALI iRENCN DAM IN IRFNCM IOBEDDING 10 PROVIDE FIRM. STABLE. -PEREM GROUNDWATERMOVEMENI - U,14 -- JI CONTINUOUS AND UNIFORM SUPPORT f(,k IN THE PIPE BEDDING, TOO SPACING ME FULL LENGTH OF PIPE. MAKIMUM �. TYPICAL SEWER TRENCH R' WATER" CAST IN COVER WATER PROVIDE WITH MUD PLUG FINISHED GRADE C AIEDCASTIRONTwO PIECE (SLIP TYPE) VALVE BC4 WITH FLANGED TOP A UD. PROVIDE GATE BOX AUGN ALL HttINGS ARE TO HAVE MEGA -LUG' RETAINER GLANDS AND STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS AND NUT$ STAINLESS STEEL NAPPING SLEEVE OVER EXISTING 6' MINIMUM WAS MAN POWER SEAL 34110 MJ OR APPROVED EQUAL 4 ML POLY BARRIER GATE VALVE IAWWA C5IS. - 3/4" CORPORATION StOP FMUELOR TESLER B-G TIN8 R CAME EIRBRIDGBRASS MODEL 301 3/4" SIONE BEDDING ` VALVE ANCHOR, S C f. I � �I I f I I I-11 I I III III III —TIC USE $0 4 BARS TOANCHOR II1_lI-1 �I�I1-1111-.I--i IF VALVE TO CONCRETE CUSS D CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK (REFER 10 THRUST NOOK TABLE FOR WE) WATER MAINS CROSSING SF WEIR SHALL BE LAID TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM VERTICAL DISTANCE OF 18 INCHES BETWEEN THE OUTSIDE Of WATER MAIN AND THE OUTSIDE OF SEWER. THIS SHALL BE THE CASE WHERE THE WATER MAN IS EITHER ABOVE OR BELOW THE SEWER. AT CROSSINGS. ONE FULL LENGTH OF WATER PIPE SHALL BE LOCATED SO BOTH JONTS WILL BE AS FAR FROM THE SEWER AS POSSIBLE. R THE SEWER MAN 6 OVER THE WATER MAN, THE FIRT SEWER PIPE JOINTS ON EACH SIDE OF THE WATER MAN MUST BE CONCRETE ENCASED. SPECIAL STRUCTURAL SUPPORT FOR THE WATER AND SEWER PIPES MAY BE REQUIRED, WATER MANS SHALL NOT PASS THROUGH SEWER MANHOLES OR BE SUBMERGED IN BASKS CONTAINING SEWAGE OR OTHER GROSSLY CONTAMINATED OR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL. TYPICAL WATER/SEWER CROSSING CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE DESIGN ENGINEER CERTIFYNG THAT THE IISIALUTION HAS BEEN INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ME PERM17ED DESIGN. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A CERTNCATION THAT THE WASTEWATER SYSTEM WAS INSTALLED AND TESTED N ACCORDANCE H ME APPROVED DESIGN PUNS. STALE PERMITS RMURE THERE SHALL BE NO DEVIATIONS FROM THE APPROVED PUNS WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVALS. THE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFLED AND ALLOWED TO OBSERVE THE CRITICAL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING ANY REQUIRED TESTS, LIKEWISE, THE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF My DEVIATIONS FROM ME APPROVED PUNS. SINCE THE DESIGN ENGINEER DOES NOT CUSTOMARILY OBSERVt. ALL PHASES OF THE WORK, OR ALL TESTING. HE MAY RELY ON THE CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION AS THE BASIS FOR FINAL CERTIFICATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL THEREFORE SIGN AND RETURN A COPY OF THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION UPON COMPLETION OF ME WORK'. T HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSTALLED. PROPERTY TESTED. AND SUCCESSFULLY PASSED MOSS TEM, AND THE WASIEwATER DISPOSAL AND COLLECTION SYSTEM(S) ARE BUILT N ACCORDANCE WITH ME APPROVED CESSION PANS ANI; APP( CABLE PERMP COND01-1 CONTRACTOR NAME AUMORRED AGENTS NAME SIGNAURE DARE _.-.. NOTE ANY DEVIA110NS FROM APPROVED PUNS HERE: b0@ 1. CONTRACTOR CERTIFICATION FOR WASTEWATER SYSTEM — Y CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE DESIGN ENGINEER CERTIFYING THAT THE INSTAL UTION HAS BEEN NSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ME PERMITTED DESIGN, ME CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A CERTIFICATION THAT THE WATER SYSTEM WAS INSTALLED AND TESTED N ACCORDANCE WITH THE WIT RO ROVED DESIGN PLANS. STATE STATE PERMITS REQUIRE THERE SHALL BE NO DEVIATIONS FROM ME APP V DT A WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVALS, THE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED ROE PLANS ANDALL WEDT ERVHEESIGNENINEER SOFLELENOUCTION NCIUDNGANY O BOBS REQWRPD TESS. LANS S THE DESIGN ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED OF ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE APPROVED PLANS. SINCE THE DESIGN ENGINEER DOES NOT CUSTOMARILY OBSERVE ALL PHASESOF THE WORK, ORALL TRTION HEMAY RELY CT THECOMRACFORE SIGN AS THEY Of FOR FINAL ING CERTIFICATION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL THEREFORE B GN AND RETURN ACOPY Of THE FOLLOWING CERTIHCAiION UPON COMPLETION OF THE WORK: � HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE INSTALLED. PROPERLY TESTED, AND SUCCESSFULLY PASSED THOSE TEM, AND THE WATER SYSTEMS) ARE BULT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED DESIGN PLANS AND APPLICABLE PERMIT CONDRIONS.- CONTRACTOR NAME: AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME. SIGNATURE: DALE: NOTE ANY DEVIATIONS FROM APPROVED PUNS HERE: CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION FOR POTABLE WATER SYSTEMS • A _ _ N 0_V J 14 �.;kej of Sae Buc' DRAFT A0� -tce - TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 4JB BUN PARK ROAD I R%UBTUN. VOBIWT 084B5 B02 BT9 B]51 I MYW.tC2VT-f%W Revepns Na. Descrptbn Dble By Use at These DraWlogs u t d. D g ,ded la1 p q. ord n N d or /p p M1 5Ao 9ary hpITiesItial . They ore not nlentled as Cautrvction pavnngs urNess rated T. Ohy_h,,s sp8cft alhd.rtlpked 'Fp Cambvc0on"«e 'mendedh, be tl orAvr -N 1 ancuns. lullpetiky lioNls 7 h gBemenh tl to d t d 'N M d pl' Iudrtlg but -1l NTIh lollWlatl to iHe AKhiOCiP ppl' bl .These ICE IPT s mW not Ue used far con h ic. layauf. Contact ICE 1« any conshvcfian sumeprp services p to OblOin eecirorec tlafa svitabM I« comnucion layout. 3 These O,,P TPK s «e spacif fo the Project ohd --1 homfeiabk. As mlrum h of semce, Nese paw , and topes thpeol fum shM by TCE are 05 exclusive poperh. Changes to the dowirgs smay oNy tPRmode by TCE. It d 6 1., man be aovgln m Thee anenrlon.1 ICE d't y. 4. By Use of 1 d gs 1 .onshuction of the Pojecl the Owne'rep 1. h M ylwveleviewetl ap«oved. arrd accepted ih d - 9 d have met Wvlh aX appRaalRe pan /d rol es«e rnesedam«e papeTh coordnw tl B,er aspects of Ne hiip the Pre,er aM Nclvlect, are respomide 1« any bs I(S ncWttirw an «ea measuretlamirlBnumf I5l leer pasmd'any buAding. 5. IT i, the User s respons t lfy to ensure tns COPY CO—Im Ne most current rev'slons. DW �." =- a^ i `* � No.9DTo `* CIVIL For PermirTing Only A,_ . 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington, Vermont Sewer & Water Details Dale: _--�130/l4 • Scae: _ HOWN PP,RCl NVmbPr K14068 Drawn BY _ RMP fti-I Eagineei. AP i—By: C8-01 r { C DRAFT TEMPORARY TYPE 11 RECEIVING CONVEYANCE OF SWALE BOTTOM OF SWALE'11 4 4 4'1 -4.1I j(,4 f£.4 ♦��.��114.1��4�.4.AA41��4411.1 4 1 � t ��.111114rr♦♦.111.1 d4 x F£.f:• 4 • !' 1'R:4 4 £ ;£ SI�[:I:4{4_.4:4:•i1 4 i i�i'i�iiO,iO�i'i�i�i �4{4y4:4.1 Q� 10�� i.00ri4�A4ODi��i i i i� VEGETATED SWALE �1�4: RIP RAP�. �� i•ti1•ti 1 1 1 1 1 1 1/ 1 ♦ 44114A44•r4A.41111 I •1 1 1BOTTOM OF SWALE�I �•. ��.��1��1��.. �1�114� fi. fit. OF SWALE SEDIMENTTOP OUTFALL tX�@ TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILE EROSION PROTECTION Y AFTER IHE FINISHED GRADE HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED AND THE FERLIMER SPREAD, PLANT THE SPECIFIED SEED MIXTURE AT A RAZE OF 4 POUNDS PER IODO SGUARE FEET AND WORK FIRMLY INTO THE SOIL. APPLY SEED ON THE PREPARED SEED NO WITH APPROVED MECHANICAL SEEDERS OR HYDROSEEDING EQUIPMENT. UPON COMPLETION OF THE ABOVE PLANTING OPERATIONS, ROLL ALL AREAS WITH A WATER FILLED GARDEN ROLLER, LEAVING THE SURFACE OF ALL AREAS TRUE TO GRADE, SMOOTH, AND FREE FROM HOLLOWS OR OTHER IRREGULARITIES, THOROUGHLY WATER ALL NEWLY PLANTED LAWNS IMMEDIATELY AFTER PIANTJRH . USING A FINE SPRAY PROTECT BANKS AND SWALES, AND PREVENT M REPAIR EROSION MAT OCCURS. BANKS, SWALES OR OTHER GRADED AREAS MAT HAVE BEEN WASHED OUT OR HAVE BECOME DAMAGED SHALL BE REPAIRED IMMEDIATELY, UNLESS APPROVAL IS GRANTED BY THE ENGINEER IO PUNT OFF SEASON, SEEDING WILL BE CONDUCTED ONLY DURING THE PERIOD FROM APRIL 15 t0 JUNE 1 OR AUGUST 15 TO OCTOBER IS, SO AS NOT t0 CAUSE INTERFERENCE. NO SEEDING 15 TO PROCEED BEFORE OTHR PHASES OR ME WORK HAS PROGRESSED SUFFICIENTLY. SEED SHALL N FRESH, CLEAN NEW SEED. SEED WHICH HAS BECOME WE AND/OR MOLDY WILL NOT N ACCEPTABLE, THE FOLLOWING SEED MIXTURE SHALL BE USED COMMONNAME WEIGHT (POUNDS PER ACREI GERMINATION CREEPING RED FESCUE 30.40 ITS KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 30-4D BJ PERENNIAL RYE -So P. RED TOP OS WHITE CIOVER OS - SEEDING (MRAFI ENVIROFENCE, OR APPROVED EQUAL MAY BE SUBSTUTITED ) FILTER FABRIC OR WOVEN WIREFABRIC -------- WIRE REINFORCEMENT F WOODEN OR METAL STAKE LMAX, lD' oc ) KEY FABRIC INTO GROUND )MIN. 61 -- FLOW o� CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR SILT FENCE 1. WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURE.- FENCE POSTS WITH WIRE TIES, WIRE FENCE REINFORCEMENTREQUIRED WITHIN ID] FT UPSLOPE OF RECEIVING WATERS, 2 NLIER CLOTH TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE FENCE WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24" ST TOP AND MID SECTION. FENCE $HALL BE WOVEN WIRE, I` � AKIMUM MEW OPENING. 3. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY SHALLBE OVERLAPPED BY SIX INCHES AND FOLDED. FILTER CLOTH SHALL BE EITHER FILTER K MIRAN TOOK, STABTUNKA T140N, OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT, 4. PREFABRICATED UNITS SHALL BE GEOFAB, ENTYROFENCE OR APPROVED EQUIVALENI. 5. MARNIENANCF SHALLBEPERFORMEDASNEEDEDANDMAIERULREMOVED WHEN SEDIMENT REACHED HALF OF FABRIC FRIGHT. '-bD.l- SILT FENCE Y2 So➢Stockpile IIIII Maintain Vegetated Cove, IIIIIIIIIIIIt II / 51.19 II II III III 5RI III III -III III III-11 II !II III' III III 111 ill IIIIIII I III I'�Iilll IIIII IIIII!-ill I IIIII III I!I ITT iIV�IIL-L IA1k�l-11F71�hI, NOTES I INSTALL SILT FENCE ALONG CONTOUR ON DOWNSLOPE SIDE OF STOCKPILE. COMPLETELY ENCLOSE STOCKPILE ON FLAT SUES. SILT FENCE TO REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL MATERIAL 6 REMOVED AND AREA IS STABILIZED. 2. A MINIMUM OF 5' SEPARATION BETWEEN THE TOE OF THE STOCKPILE SLOPE AND THE SILT FENCE IS REQUIRED AT ALL TIME WINTER CONSTRUCTION THIS INTER CONSTRUCTION EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN MUST BE ADHERED FOR CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN OCTOBER 15 AND APRIL 15. TO ENSURE COVER OF DISTURBED SOIL IN ADVANCE OF A MELT EVENT. AREAS OF DISTURBED SOIL MUST BE STABILDED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY, WITH THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS 1I HID.O PRECUTTATION WTIHIN 24 HOURSRESUME IN 6 FORECAST AND WORK WILL RESUIN IRE SAME DISTURBED AREA WITHIN 24 HOURS. DAILY STMILWATION IS NOT NECESSARY 2. DISTURBED AREAS THAI COLLECT AND RETAIN RUNOFF. SUCH AS HOUSE FOUNDATIONS OR OPEN UTILITY TRENCHES. PRIOR TO STANWATION, SNOW OR ICE MUST BE REMOVED TO A THICKNESS OF NO MORE THAN I INCH. MULCH USED FOR TEMPORARY STABRDAl10N MUST BE APPLIED AT DOUNE THE STANDARD RATE. OR A MINIMUM OF 3 NCNB WITH AN 90,RM COVER. SILT FENCE AND OMER PRACTICES REQUIRING EARTH DISTURBANCE MUST BE INSTALLED AHEAD OF FROZEN GROUND. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES MUST BE KEPI OPEN AND FREE OF SNOW AND ICE DAMS. A MINIMUM 25 FOOT BUFFER SHALL BE MAINTAINED FROM PERIMETER CONTROLS SUCH AS SILI FENCES. IN AREAS OF DISTURBANCE THAT DRAIN TO A WATER BODY WITHIN 100 FEET, SILT FENCE SHALL BE REINFORCED. ALL AREAS THAT ARE DISTURBED DURING WINTER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STABILIZED BY APPLYING SEED AND MULCH AT TWICE THE NORMAL RATE AND THEN COVERED WITH STRAW MATTING. SNOW MANAGEMENT TO ENSURE ADEQUATE STORAGE AND CONTROL OF MELTWATER CLEARED SNOW MUST BE SIOCKRIED DO W NSLOPE OF DISTURBED AREAS. SNOW STOCKPILES MUST SE KEPT CLEAR OF STORMWATER TREATMENT STRUCTURES. DRAINAGE ,,'-.TJRES SHOULD BE CHEDKED REGUTIF Y AND KEPI FREE OF WOW AND ICE JAMS. .l REQUIREMENTS FOR WINTER CONSTRUCTION >,FYle -. ITI1.wL E- -BF-111- INo� I. INSTALL BARRIER TAPE. 2. INSTALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AS SPECIFIED IN PHASE. 3. INSTALL SILT FENCE IN LOCATION SHOWN ON PLANS AS DETAILED. 4. STAKE OUT CONSTRUCTION, CLEAR AND GRUB. S. STOCK PILE, PROCESS, AND DISPOSE OF TREES. 6. CONSTRUCT NECESSARY STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ROADS. ESTABLISH DITCHLINES FROM DOWNHILL TO UPHILL. INSTALL CHECK DAMS AND EROSION CONTROL FABRIC IN DITCHUNES AS DETAILED. MAINTAIN TRAFFIC FLOW AS SHOWN. 7. CONSTRUCT SITE FEATURES. 8. VEGETATE AND STABILIZE AS NECESSARY WITHIN SEVEN DAYS. 9. RECEIVE APPROVAL FROM ON -SITE CO-ORDINATOR PRIOR TO MOVING TO NEXT PHASE. �@ GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE Y CONSTRUCTION SrECA1CATIONS STONE WE -USE 4$CRUSHED STONE, OP RECLMMED OR RECYCLED CONCRETE EQUIVALENT. 2 LENGM I NOT LESS THAN SD' IEXCEFt ON A SINGLE RESIDENCE LOT WHERE A 30' MINIMUM LENGTH APPLIES). THICKNESS - NOT LESS THAN B'. A WIDTH IWELW (12) FOOT MINIMUM. BUT NOT LES THAN THE FULL WIDTH AT POINTS WHERE INGRESS OR EGRESS OCCURS, 1 WENIY-FOUR (241 FOOL If SINGLE ENTRANCE TO SITE GEOTEXIBES MUST BE PLACED OVER THE ENTIRE AREA PRIOR TO PLACING OF "CHR. 6. SURFACEWAIER LLSURFACEWATERNOWINGORDIVERTED TOWARDS CONSIRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE PIPED BENEATH THE ENTRANCE IF PIPING IS IMPRACTICAL A MOUNTABLE BERM WITH 5.1 SLOPES WILL BE PERMITTED. MAINTENANCE - THE ENIRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDNTON WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTSOi WAY ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED. DROPPED, WASHED OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTSOF WAY NMI BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY AND DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE EPSC PLANS, L1, PLACED IN A SOIL STOCKPILE OR AREA WHERE IT CAN BE SIABIDIED PER EPSC DETAILS). IF SWEEPING IS THE CHOSEN METHOD FOR REMOVAL THE SWEPT MATERMI MUST BE COLLECTED AND DISPOSED OF AS STATED ABOVE. B WHEN WASHING IS REQUIRED. IT SHALL BE DONE ON AN AREA STA•-D WIN STONE AND WHICH DRAW INTO AN APPROVED SEDIMENT TRAPPING DEVICE. s. PERIODIC INSPECTION AND NEEDED MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO PERMIT REQUIREMENTS BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS. WEATHER AND NOW OF TRAFFIC. 'lR��.l�- STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE FINE GRAY IT MIN IN 3"! t J TYPICAL INLET PROTECTION Y 1 DRAFT EXCAVATION SITE PUSUC ROADWAY T PROFILE o ` GEOIEXi11F FANtIC 4 CRUSHED STONE AGGREGATE PLACED ON GEOTEXTTE 'AMC 4' ABOVE EXILSUNG GRADE 4' BELOW EXISTING GRADE EXCAVATION SITE If '1 SEE CONSTRUCIKIN -. SPECRNCATION4 - 50' PLAN �10V r,) "1 91014 1.9 DRAFT 4.�R. -tce - TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 4RB BLAW PARK ROAD I �RIISTW, vi3WMT 05485 602 TO I 11••.1fEVY.F.COY Revisions No. Oescrip- Dole By w DIawirgs are mantletl 1p pal �mq I mwmio wan omer tliscipunn �BFlimnor OP/w alMlova� o-om Ma mgNolory oWnanias. W rllav aye nol:,relloetl m <onstll,�l;on movMngs Unless Iwtao 2, ONY Nowvlgz spac1-TY mpketl 'FoI C-11-ton' ore rote to be Usetl W vYX a l'wn VAIN co ag ,nd to UK, Yc,, So t,o I g menh Wt to UK,MYto rd' tl t,fO d R. clUtlirp Iwt iP`Emlatl to.ltle Arch L if OpPI bl 1N Ilovnngs snaFrwr be tll anMwt -t. coot«1 ICE � Non yilg W elec Oo oriel -.I- Wosl. 3. Ines DU.XTU1 . sped[ to Ine Froje tl 1.1 11 M T UTU of sera . M Novmgs, old opus It,i lUm K1 by ICE a tN cluz ve KUL a 1y. Chpngazto llletl Yq may,Nyb ,d,by TCE It tl-Y. INey snoll ba -USTHI to Ile KUention of TCE- d1toW, 4. IT UP, of these hvwRAls tp ComlucBon of INe Project file .v Iepl the ai Mot Mendoveravw1 PppFovatl. pntl Pcceptetl Iw Qvlon pntl twee met min all wppicwble POHiei/tliscipli It to in- tnese PlPns pe pope,,a-Hatao Witn.P p- To,ofIre 16,1I. The U ntl .19 asps-d I b INngs -wtln9 tl Yve 1511eet IW bvJWlg. 55 III) �s FesPaUC•ry 1--on-on-in, c�2 L `* f No.9fl'N >R GIVE A j 1 IN 11SSYY"``` For Permli�ing Only holed RIe 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington, Vermont Erosion Details Dole. IILIKiI4 ScolK. SHOWN Prgecs - M14D99 DUv BY RMP PlopCt Engineer: AAD Approved By, . � ; -: _.. C8-02 C NOTES: I THICKNESS INCHES) ROADS PARKING t01S PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS A 1-1n 2 1I/2 B 2i/] 3 -___-�._._ T 1/2 N/A C 6 d 6 4 D 12 IR IT IB 12 d 6 d d TYPICAL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 5'LANDING ---- -- DOORWAY -- / 111 MAKUV- BEVELED- ACCESSIBLE ROUTE PREFERRED FLUSH BUILDING / WALKWAY BFROST WALL BY BUILDING DESIGNER(s) -` A\ F F.E. , 1; n AxIMuM _ NOTES: ' .A NY SSHE WORK WITHIN S' OF THE BUILDNG MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE BUILDING DESIGNER(S). 1I 2. REBAR IN CONCRETE AND - PINNINGSIDEWALKTO I BUILDING BY BUILDING 1I DESIGNER(S) _ BANK RUN GRAVEL IO FOOTING LEVEL AND PROPERLY DRAINED - FOUNDATION BY BUILDING DESIGNERTS) DOORWAY LANDING 12- GREEN - -- BLUE .. -. GREEN - VAN IVAN SPACE ONLY) A®E -EAK-AWAY STYLE - SIGN P09ISTEEL) FINISH GRADE - All 1 CONCRETES NO (OPTIONAL) - "HC ACCESSIBLE SIGN DK'A FT /BELL! M NOW PAVEMENT SEE SECTION DETAIL 61 CONCRELE-11I CLASS B CONCRETE I REVEAL SIOPE� -11 PBX "LT. F NNE BANK RUN GRAVEL -- CRUSHER RUN GRAVEL TYPICAL CURB DETAIL SPECIFICATIONS: N la EXPANSION/CONTRACTION JENNT WITH ASPHALT IMPREGIIATED FIBER BOARD FILLER EVERY 50 FEET. 21 SCORED OR TOOLED JOWL (I DEPTH OR 1131HE TOTAL DEPTH OF WALK) WHH A SEPARATION DISTANCE EQUAL TO THE WIDIN OF THE SIDEWALK 3) HULL -BREAK OR COMPLETE JOINT EVERY N FEET. 4) WHERE" HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE SECTION6 CALLED OUT ON THE SITE PLAN, THE SIDEWALK 5 TO BE B" THICK CONCRETE WEAR ff COURSE (4000 PSI) B�� VAAIES' 6� i I 1 I I REINFORCING BARS, 5. DETAIL ir MINIMUM 18' GRAVEL BASE IrNOIE: DRiANCFS ARE ttRGL OWNER TO COORDINATE WITH OTHER DISCIPUNES I ANDMAY BE AITEREDFOR IARCMRECl/STRUCTURALENGMEER) ON SIDEWALK WRHN 5' Of ANDAICSRE ALFRE OR BUILDING. IN SOMECASES SIDEWALK WILL HAVE FROST WALLOR BE PINNED TO FOUNDATION TO PREVENT FROST ACRON IN FRONT OF DOOR. TYPICAL CONCRETE SIDEWALK i O ' - - REE wHRE STRIPING PERR MUTCUTCD I�]4 TYPICAL CROSSWALK MARKING NoxA e PEDESTRIAN CROSSING 6" CLASS A CONCRETE SUB. BROOM FINISH pSREIrviORCING BARS IZ'O.C.BOTH WAYS, S CLEAR 1 III i 11' BANK RUN GRAVEL I I I'li \-- COMPACTED SUBBASE A& REINFORCED CONCRETE PAD I1I4 P PEDESTRIAN(SYMBOL) R AS PER MUTCD R DIAGONAL ARROW ARROW FLECRVE SHEETING SHALL BE A MNIMUM — IT SHEETING EES F1I 1:2D MAX SLOPE- SEE SR PUN I FOR GRADE DETAILS Y Y ACCESSIBLE Rom Y Y YY Y f.y Y N..i�. uu Y yVp IVDEVY— ww Y Y y�I1 zxuo� - TREVEAL DROP CURB WHH A MAX. 11! VERTKAt OR 117 BEIRED LID WITH I:2 SLOPE DROP CURB AND ACCESSIBLE ENTRY I I!? TYPE BI ERLA OVY I i? ttPF II U 3 TYPE 113 COLD PLANE HNEGRADEDCRUSNEDGRAVEL MALCH EXISTING HIGHWAY BASE DEPTH DEN5E GRADED CRUSHED STONE �l PAVEMENT JOINT DETAIL NOV 0 3 2014 C-ity of So. Burlington OTIS Ii -tce - ,%loot TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS !]8 BI.AR PAWL RGIb 1 KB.LLSION. --I 0518E BB2 BA 8351 i A. Desug — Use oI Bmlm DIOl 1. (ITpen olM se sgsetl. inete IXawinps me hlerWea for IN— Lt—pa".coerarw I vimomertliscHile,M NRiies. aM/a apgoval bom me reguat mi aushdilias. Tner ore na alenaea as con:INctan arn«rtgs unless noted as wcn. 2 Ottly tl'awing pact Inta,mo R C t clop' Ore f tletl to be a- —*— wttt t I tl pa f ib / 1 g emenls Ztll be luYy aVa m tl 'olh tl pX 'ncluarp I UIt Fam—I., 11m nN Lit pp- am fi e IX gs znoun Ibe tll caHt f RSY I Cm-t 10Et V nsB Ian -rp oblun etec - IILI Wei --Ka you. 3. Tirese Drowetg —Cik . 1. Rojo M nol f de. tm 1 tens . m d -area oyes M1veo.1 sea aY TCE —,a a ve propartY. cn ges rothea rt� b matleby,ol 1 0 tl,t neY snail be brWflhl to me allention of lCE' me-tl' ly. +. BY use of Ines a 'nfl5 f ch... vi of 11 Roject. me Owner repress t Nla neYM1 ve revievretl approvatl. ontl accaptea ins ao^11sgs tl M1ove met min aE applcable POH Itl d1.nwretreze pbm me ryopesta ccmairntetl min other aspects ofY Prgecl. 1M Owmno —va,ct or ohs bie for pnYb N.(5 slwvnl. acWar�p or ameasumtl omin mum N. 15)1ee1 �reare 5 U - ne Lm—es i1a0ty to ensure a to copy contains Ma D1�EUF f T " Hby i `or, No.9820 ♦ CIWL For Permi r}ring Only 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park • Lot 3 South Burlington, Vermont Site Details D.- 10M04 xde: SHOWN Roject Number: 201+1).98 Dal —By: RMP Project Engineer. AAD Approved BY: ---- EieW Book' C8-03 RAFTI GRASSED AREA NISHEO ROADGRMES r -- REPLACE TOPSOIL, SEED, ANDMULCH ZO OVERFILL TO ALLOW FOR SETTLEMENT. Q F THOROUGHLY COMPACTE➢SELECTED BACKFBL FROM TRENCH EXCAVATION. FREE OF STONES URGER THAN 3' M DIAMETER COMPACT BACKFILL NJ 6" UFIS -- THE SIDES OF TRENCHES SHALL BE SHEETED OR SLOPED TO VOSHP STANDARpS. HOPE PIPE '� "--'--- - - - ;- TED3/d"CRUSHED ACTS CRUSHED STORE BEDDING STONE BEDDING FOR PVC. OR PIPE, GFORC C UNDISTURBED SOIL NOTES ON STORM DRAIN TRENCH: - _ A WET FRENCH SHALL BE DE W ATERED PRIOR TO I INSIAWNG BEDDING - _._.. THE LEPER'U SHOWN ON THE DETAIL INDICATES ' THE DIAMETER Oi THE PIPE. DEPTH OF STORM DRAIN LINES VARY, REFER TO F,. h..OR DFPII' Iry APPROPFIAIF Lc ATIONS. TYPICAL STORM DRAIN TRENCH IN PAVED AREAS IN GRASSED AREAS IEBARON 1A0910 COVER. T 'CtFANOUT LABEL I AP - BACXHLLED TRENCH \- 6" PVC SDR 35 SLEEVE \ - d PVC SDR 35 RBER ---- 4" PVC SDI, u AS' ELBOW VF0 d"PVC SDR 35 15'-1 FLOW 11VCSDR351I1E �e TYPICAL UNDERDRAIN CLEANOUT DETAIL Y MANHOLE NOTES I. IF DEPTH OF MANHOLE S J FEET OR LESS FROM RIM TO CENTERLINE 24 OPENING INVERT. THEN A FLAT TOP WILL BE INSTALLED . IT DEPTH S MORE THAN FEET HEN A CONICAL - I_ I s' HEAVY DUTY FRAME & UD LABELED DRAIN NEENAH R I"I OR tEBARON LC 266 \ GROUT FRAME TO 4INCHES FROM TOP TOP WILL BE INSTALLED, 2. ADJUST IS SNEEDED TO MATCH 7 i` FRED SiCONCRETEADIUSTMEN IRING HEALPAVEMENT. ': SECTION MINIMUM 4 MDHES UM12INCHES -- COPOLYMER POLYPROPYLENE _ - (ADDER RUNGS 170C. KCENiRIC CONICAL TOP SECTION • - - BUTYL JOINT SEALANT 2 g Z 5, IB r &p O .. WELDED WIRE FABRIC (6 X 6 WWFi RUBBER BOOT (PRESS SEAL PS%) MAXIMUM PIPE SIZE 3" PVC 24- RCP.CSP,CMP.CPEP o 1 1 STORM DRAIN LINE I� ZQ AA BARS, IT O.C. BOTH WAYS T17'GRAVEL OR I"STONE FOR STUB tE OR AS REQURED BY ENGREER IF WET — AND OR UNSTABLE CONDITIONS EXIST. UNDITURBED SOIL. b&— TYPICAL STORMINATER MANHOLE Y 6 THICK TYPE I RIP -PAP LAID ON - NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTRE FABRIC - IMIRAFI ICN. VMA%P 550 TURF REINFORCEMENT MATTING OR APPROVED EQUAL) LEVEL ;MATCHAL SPLASH FINry PAD GRADE '77�; J (} OUTLET FROM ':TOTING/UNDERDRAIN f 3' MINIMUM AREA SWIDE x S0 TON(. '+- /----- POLY ETHYLENE FLARED END SECTION, ------ / ADS OR EQUAL. PLAN VIEW INLET OUTLET CONDITION CONDITION --- SMOOTH INTERIOR, CORRUGATED EXTERIOR, HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HOPE), ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS (ADS) PROVIDE 171YPERRIPRAP--------- FINISHED GRADE -----------� N 12. OR EQUAL. TO MATCH TAPERED OVER 17' TYPE P20d RIPRAP SIDES OF END SECTION FOR PIPES 15" OR SMALLER, USE I V TY E II OVER 17' TYPE (-- SLOPE AS PER P201 FOR PPF OVER IS" SITE PLAN I � SLOPE AS PER SITE PLAN \ INLET - POLYETHYLENE FLARED END SECTION. OUTLET CONDITION ADS OR EQUAL. CONDITION ELEVATION VIEW MIRAF"I FABRIC -'- (OR APPROVED EQUAL) I; POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) END SECTION NOTE'. OUTFALL NOT REQUIRED IF DISCHARGED TO STABILIZED SWAT FOOTING/UNDERDRAIN OUTFALL _2 REMOVE 12" PERFORATED PVC PIPING, REPLACE WITH CAP AT END OF TEE. PROVIDE 1.2"ORIFICE ATELEVATION 334.0 WITH STORMRAX NOIRE INLET PROTECTION DEVICE -- CAST IRON LIGHT DUTY RATED GRATE coo 00 C_ C� 00 O C� OD e } ( C FRAME&GRn1i.D I� HEAVY LAID NEENAH R 31D58 OR LEBARON 112. 2 w - A _ FT INLETS NOT LOCATED NEXT TO A. CURB. USE Ad FLANGEFRAME --- GROUT FRAME TO d INCHES FROM TOP 24 PRECAST CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RING _ T .. MINIMUM d INCHES. MAXIMUM 121NCHE5 I - --'------ LADDER RUNGS* 17' O.C. iW _ i -I— Z I .-._. DIAMETER SEE TABLE -....--.._.. WELDED WIRE FABRIC IT X 6 I-F) OR AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN ir.I' STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FLEXIBLE RUBBER BOOT 6 I I ... I � e TYPICAL CATCH BASIN Y 24' DRAIN BASIN BY NYOPLAST OR APPROVED EQUAL OUTLET ADAPTER — FOR WE WITH VARIOUS vlf TYPES OF OUTLETS WIN WAiERTIGHTADAPTERS '6'GRAVEL OR AS REQUIREDBY SDR 35 SEWER ENGINEER A-2000 CORRUGATED PVC ULTRA RID PVC CORRUGATED POLYEHYLENE TYPICAL YARD DRAIN RESET INVERT ELEVATION OF OUTLET GRATE TO 335.SD' FINISH GRADE 3: T WNAIUM --STRAP r TO GCINC. PAD TOP OF R' (ROE \ L T rL \\1\- EXCAVATE AND REMOVE �r3kR' COAL. PAD SEC1XtE PRxE TD PAD rP• Sp''D P1C WASHED CRUSHED STONE TO S-0.005 ELEVATION 333.50 MODIFIED EXTENDED DETENTION WETLAND OUTLET SCALE 1'=4• DR-041L TYPE INS DE p1AMETER MA VC`.- %. I E IAMETER ,CAAP,CDEP R 10 iW DA OS ae° 60 3D' nY' 2<- 36 g B s B I7' 6" OB 96' MT' Sr I7 17' R" Ba BARS. 17' O C. BOTH WAYS OR AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY F 17 GRAVEL ORA 1"STONEFOR SU -BASE OR AS REQUIRED 0T ENGINEER IF ON ANDS E UNSTABLE CONDITIONS EXIST UNDISTURBED SOIL EGE-NED City of So. Burlington DRAFT �► -te 6- '%loop TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 4R LYJ1R PARX ROAD I RUIBIDN. YFAYONT 65196 agz BTR out I ....I�VDCOY Use of These Drawings i Unless o nofetl, these D,O ing3 am inlerMM for gelimnary rIo."Pg cooMnaTon 'In I d F1'nes« ulll lies, and/«apProvOlhom Ma WI W ihoi l'es. shay ore not intentletl OS consirucT d gs unless nofetl 2. DIN drpvnngz—u Icdl, P.— Fq Conshuc8on" INe intentletl to be usetl W conjunction mM conlracl docV3rlenlz.specif dlbm. MU, III, ipl— a 00, bM so be Wlly 11, 111 PINT PrimT OPP dhcigine3. indudilg but rot Rselised b.Ine NCNIBcI.I pPPEcable. Inese DEox%rgs CPR notfx used for comhuclion byoul. Conbcl rcE I« am comhuclion sMPeyirg seWice3 «lo ablam rMechortc data suitable for conslvclm byoul. „. ifrese Ommrgs ore Stlb fo Me Prgect Ontl «e rwl I seMce Brew dlamngz, arrtl opie o1.1 ' hed W ICE INe its exclusive properly. Ch rge 1 i W g y only be Ode by TCE. It dBc d.Ihey mall be bought to 1. att-I.n of TCE' medbt ly. d. BY use of Ihese b.WPgP T h fi 1 PF, Project, ne O epm th M r h tl pgoved. d p eC the drawings d tg t T III PPf able prarsre /d ip he PI-1 gapeny tln " pe P,q 1. The Owrre M NCN Emem able I y bruetlings Rrcing r tl rtwrt fve T5l feel «curb arry building. 5. R is Me ours respomiWlly to emge Ma col»' confairs Rre moss curem revhi«rs. `^GHOF ^vE�db * x No. 917A) OwL �h Tr ONAL FE`{' For Permitting Only 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington, Vermont snee ;'r Storm Details Dole: 10130Y1a Scde: as shown PEORcf Nsmber. 201dC88 Pawn BY RMP Projec3 Engine«. _ AAD Approved 81................... .... Feld BUNk: . C8-04 1 NMI - sir 1. _ II t II,I tt�:ll.tt BUILDING SECTION - LOOKING WEST SCALE: 3/32" = P-0" Q O 9A Q O Ib AI O , 1 O IA )POPPARAPET ----- .....__.. _.___-._-. _.-. .__. --. _. -. __- -_--- -..-.. ((._... ....-.__.--. .._..-..._..-.... L.7RPA' 7-..-_._-_. I / ��I_- 7POFROCAFtIEQ JII INMEMINE IEEE L 71R4• _.--_. �..... _. ....... i �. _... 3POFRLABIFUMLOOR) -.. RADE(WE4r9M ',. ,MECH. / ELF( SPRINKI_GK 001 BUILDING SECTION - LOOKING NORTH \ SCALE: 3/32" = F-0" GRADE-(FiARIS� NOV0 a 20 City of So. Burlingion 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington. VT DESIGN -BUILDER: ReAo,h Company 55 Community Drive South Burlington, VT OSd03 Phone:(802)863-8727 ARCHITECT: S2 Architeeture 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelbume. VT 05482 Phmte:(803)985-5595 DATE: 10.2R_ 14 REVISIONS BUILDING SECTIONS A5.1 5 C H.39id' A raOPPARAP6T 7[ItOP�--COPY. -- PL 3704 1TIPOFSIAB(m1II.00R) SCALE: 3132" = 1'-0" A5.1 A5.1 A6 U 24 )" 24 -0 _ * rl- x. 24'0 I6-0' 16-0 y _I _ _ 1 Ll I I I r 1 l 1 raaP�(Pmcl Pma1 I I f. a 34S T' O SLAB LGHI'.) GRAOR(VI'84r&me1 I pL 136� I ,. I LI I I 2� SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" LA 0 y 7 ...,13 0 112" EL 393•d• aff-3W.9TOPOPP•1RAP6f .. - } ] �� PRE -CAST CONCRETE 24'-0" I ;, Z-+ 0' 13 01/2 ✓///-r' COPING CFYPJ r 13RIC'K VENEER (TYRI -FINISHED UMINUM WINDOWS(TYP) 1 .. PRE-CASTCONCRETE HALF ROUND(TYP.) .I -rl WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE(TYP.) PRE-CASTCONCRED3 DI MPSI Lk AREA W/ PANELS ITYP i 1, HIGH BRICK SCREENING WALL. 11-350'-10" ®YTlma-1l�T\�Sil9 .UMN CO V FR IT)'1'., PRE -CAST CONCRM, &. 2a-0 _._ � 2a'-�".. a-0,. _.. / "", 'C'OPING(TYP.) h I I BRICK VENEER (TYP 1 j I ^---- -- t�--^--- _ PRE -FINISHED ALUMINUM WINDOWS(TYP.) PRECAST CONCRETE _ - HALF ROUND(TYP.) I '3^ ----WALL MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE (IYRI t _ _PRE -CAST C.ONCREIE PANELS(TYP.) I I PL.311'-IC o 1 w1 EL 11 11 I II 11 ! LI'3W4' 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington. VT DESIGN -BUILDER: ReArch Comp ny 55 Community Dn- South Burlinggton, VT 05403 Phone:(802)863-8727 ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shdbu— Rd. Shelburne, VT 05482 Phmte:(802)985-5595 DATE: 10.28.14 REVISIONS' EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A4. I O O MARM 103 216'-Ir TZ-7 IV-v 24W, 2CAr 13'-Q VT' - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 17 -1 j; A5.1 IN-0112- 24'-Q' 24'-V 2*-V I&-V IV -a, ------------- ------------------------ --- T I -A -1 it 1."If -M I T T q r P. L1 '-2 4 CLFAR Itzrssiari F -I r- ' -I - i 4 , 1 1 - -4 LTJ 1-1 L J, L - I F -I 4- 1 1L J1 J4 It L L--J I limit it AII ---------- .-" e e II 1 T . . . ........ MECH. I ELEC. SPRINKLER Pa I BASEMENT PLAN SCALE: 3/32" = F-O" RFC-FJVEF)4-\ " V13 - I Nf� M4 V Gj4s of So, Burfington 88 Technology Park Way Tulmology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington, VT DESIGN -BUILDER: RcAr,h Company 55 Community Drive South Burlingtoti, VT 05403 Mme:(802)863-8727 ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne. VT 05482 Ph.-:(902)985-5595 IDATE: 10.28.14 1 REVISIONS I BASEMENT PLAN I A2.0 4841"IT-01/2- 21P-W, 24W 2f-v 161-V 16W 21W j 21r-(r 2,V4r 16W T FIRST FLOOR PLAN �\ SCALE: 3/32" = F-0" MOV, so, Burlingtorg 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington. VT DESIGN -BUILDER: ReAmh Company 55 Cay Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Ph:(802)863-8727 ARCHITECT: S2 Architecture 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne. VT 05482 Ph_;(802)985-5595 IDATE: 10.28.14 REVISIONS MST FLOOR PLAN A2.1 OS IO 2.0 3.0 4.4 4.6 5.0 6.0 T.0 8.0 9.0 93 _— . -.. -_ --4.0 _ 21G-0" 24-0" 24•-0" to ---- —16'JI" Is-0^ _. 7A•-0" _--. -._ TA41'--- --. u'-0" 7A•-0' li'-0tm I I I I I I T CIPM SPACE I IAN a 11 11 � t w �F210] I I I I mot , I I I 'I I I I I , 1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3/32" = 1 •-0" ity of So. Burli., ' 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington. VT DESIGN -BUILDER: RcAn,h Company 55 O.—an) Dd South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)863-8727 ARCHITECT: S2 Anhiwmue 5224 Shclbume Rd. Shelburne. VT 05482 Phonc0021985-5595 DATE: M28.14 1 REVISIONS I SECOND FLOOR PLAN I A2.2 .a U ()- _- --. Q3164Y �. _ - ___._... 0 5 T 20 3A IA /.I Ib SA 6A 7A LO T 9 THIRD FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3132" = 1'-0" REC,17 VE%� Cit j of So. Plwriington 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington, VT DESIGN -BUILDER: ReAreh Company 55 Communin Drive South Burlington, VT 054113 Ph—:(802)963-8727 ARCHITECT: S2 ArehitttKure 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne. VT 0.5482 Phone: 02085-5595 DATE: 10.28.14 REVISIONS THIRD FLOOR PLAN A2.3 OS 1.0 i0 3.0 4A 4.4 {.0 SA 6.0 7.0 RO 9.0 95 I I oVEtFlnw I ( I I I ( I ( ' (CENFEROVBR j I WRNDOWBBIAW) I IV-0 Mr 2C-W _ 2C4r'__ 2W-W _ _-_IB-0' _-_ __... IF-0^ 16-0' _._- __. 2A-W __... 2w-w 24'-V 7A'-0". 13'-01/Y '� ' T-1• 16-/1' ' fi 16-11' _ I6-II' T- PmBTFLASHMCE: SfiTON D (D) (0) DETAILS 1• ', OVERFLOW kUPPFR \ wINODW BLOW) `.\��8TA• COP NO II ro) (o) � \ ro) � cmF.) BTIIS SBMi — —� OVERFLOW APBRBD INSULATION TO \\\`� I BELOW) i i i 0STAIRWFILROOF. ��' W24DOWBOW) AM MIN, 6' 1NSM. (0) ROOF DRAM (-31_ (o _ t 6-31/2' - 1 /'// \ / \ oYEtFLOW SCUPPER, / 7?ON ROOF / \ \\ / i j\`••\\�) - h _.BILOOTYPI S ORBUAL \ i3') 1 2) L FLUEPRO}.. /- a' COMPLETE FLASHrG SYSTEM per' \\ I 2 CA HIGH PONIT ROOF \ �' (7yp, �tII21 "DRAM ROOFDRAIN )' R4 \ / '�yIIgI% DRAIN.. - (fi7 (67 \ 1J N dBCIL O / k: ro> ( ro> 7 , k � � \ CFp MEMBRANE OVEtF1AW SC OVERFLOW SCUPP)Q �� ACCESS WALKWAYS SEFI/A4.2FORLOCATION ROOFDRAIN I L ( RIM MEMBRANE GUP IPO (�` ''a I / ROOF DRAM FRAME Si)'t'(1RT3 aCbUNTERFLASk / 74 c0> M\ ' (0) cm ' i I (0) PRE -CAST CO G_ Imo, T'YFB /' L B THIS S I TYPE A(IMLP.SS - jN i PDOTBEtWISM 1 ROOF PLAN SCALE: 3/32" = I'-0" — -- BS 0 ROOF _ DRAM \ it CA cs ITAPeR@ INSULATUSO DRAM ®STAIRWEl2. ROOF. ( MAMTAM MM.6• MSUL DS N 1;lflAl � •;1 +v��; Cit,� r)f 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington. VT DESIGN -BUILDER: RCArch Cnrnpany 55 Community Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone:(802)863-8727 ARCHITECT: S2 Architeet- 5224 Shelburne Rd. Shelburne. VT 05482 Phone:(802)985-5595 DATE: 10.28.14 REVISIONS A2.4 400�. Y ElAMO V l ooe State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources Department of Environmental Conservation [Phone] 802-879-5656 Drinldng Water and Groundwater Protection Division [fax] 8o2-879-3871 Essex Regional Office ill West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452-4695 www.septic.vt.gov July 1, 2015 Technology Park Campus, LLC 55 Community Drive, Suite 402 South Burlington VT 05403 RE: WW-4-4411-1, 88 Technology Park Way Lot 3 amending Permit WW-4-4411 to relocate the water service line for the previously approved office building on Lot 3 with Zoo employees, municipal water and wastewater services, 88 Technology Park Way, South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Applicant: We received your completed application for the above -referenced project on June 29, 2015, including a fee of $180.00 paid by check #3983. Under the performance standards for this program, we will have a maximum of 45 days of "in-house" time to review your application. If we require further information from you to make a decision, the time until we receive it is not included in the in-house performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 45 in-house days, please contact this office. We have forwarded the information contained in your application to the Information Specialist for this region. A Project Review Sheet will be sent to you indicating other state agencies and departments you should contact regarding additional permits or approvals you may need under their programs. If you have not already done so, you should also check with town officials about any necessary town permits. For the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division am Mvw, Jessanne Wyman Regional Engineer cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Abigail Dery/Trudell Regional Offices — Barre/EssexM./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury . o�, VERMONT State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Agency of Natural Resources WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED io V.S.A. Chapter 64, Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, Effective September 29, 2007 Chapter 21, Water Supply Rules, Effective December 1, 2010 Landowner(s): Technology Park Campus, LLC 55 Community Drive, Suite 402 South Burlington VT 05403 Permit Number: WW-4-4411-1 PIN: EJ96-o138.04 This permit affects property identified as Town Tax Parcel ID # South Burlington: 0436-00030.03 referenced in a deed recorded in Book 898 Page(s) 210 of the Land Records in South Burlington, Vermont. This project, consisting of amending Permit #WW-4-4411 to relocate the water service line for the previously approved office building on Lot 3 with Zoo employees, served by municipal water supply services and municipal wastewater disposal services located on 88 Technology Park Way in South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. 1.GENERAL 1.1 The project shall be completed as shown on the following plans and/or documents prepared by Abigail Dery, P.E. of Trudell Consulting Engineers, with the stamped plans listed as follows: Sheet Number Title Plan Date Plan Revision Date C2-01 Overall Site Plan 10/30/2014 6/25/2015 C2.02 Site Plan 10/30/2014 6/23/2015 C8.o1 Water/Sewer Details 10/30/2014 3/23/2015 1.2 This permit does not relieve the landowner from obtaining all other approvals and permits PRIOR to construction including, but not limited to, those that may be required from the Act 25o District Environmental Commission, the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division, the Watershed Management Division, the Division of Fire Safety, the Vermont Department of Health, the Family Services Division, other State departments, and local officials. 1.3 The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the landowner and all assigns and successors in interest. The landowner shall record and index this permit in the South Burlington Land Records within thirty (3o) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. 1.4 All conditions set forth in Permit Number WW-4-4411 shall remain in effect except as amended or modified herein. 1.5 Construction of additional nonexempt buildings, including commercial and residential buildings, is not allowed without prior review and approval by the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. No construction is allowed that will cause non-compliance with an existing permit. 1.6 Each purchaser of any portion of the project shall be shown a copy of the Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit and the stamped plan(s), if applicable, prior to conveyance of any portion of the project to that purchaser. Regional Offices - Barre/Essex Jet./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit W W-4-4411-1 Page 2 of 2 1.7 By acceptance of this permit, the landowner agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property subject to this permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental/health statutes, regulations, and permit conditions, including performing an inspection of the wastewater disposal and water supply systems serving the/each structure. 1.8 Any person aggrieved by this permit may appeal to the Environmental Court within 3o days of the date of issuance of this permit in accordance with io V.S.A. Chapter 22o and the Vermont Rules of Environmental Court Proceedings. 2-WATER SUPPLY 2.1 This project is approved for connection to the water supply system owned by the City of South Burlington (VTo005092) for a maximum of 2700 gallons of water per day. 2.2 The landowner shall install and maintain backflow prevention devices that conform to Vermont Department of Public Safety standards and NFPA 13 for the connection of any sprinkler fire suppression system to a public drinking water system. 2.3 This permit is based, in part, on a municipal approval for connection to their water distribution system. If the municipal approval expires, this permit shall be invalid unless the municipality renews its approval. If the municipality approval expires, a new permit must be issued for the project. An updated application form and an application fee will be required for the project. A new municipal approval letter shall be required. The rules in effect at the time of the filing of the application for a new permit will be applied to the project. David K. Mears, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By Dated July 1, 2015 Jessa ne Wyman,�Regio�alEngineer Essex Regional Office Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division cc South Burlington Planning Commission Abigail Dery/Trudell Act 25o District Environmental Commission-4Co190-10 Department of Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety June 30, 2015 Re: #SP-15-44 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. /Sincere! , ii�k aymo/nd J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com June 25, 2015 Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: 88 Technology Park Way Site Plan Application Dear Ray: TRUDELL Consulting Engineers On behalf of our client, Technology Park Campus, LLC, Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) has prepared a Site Plan Application for 88 Technology Park Way for a reduction in the number of permitted vehicles from 139.8 trips to 82 trips. In addition, the applicant is proposing to add a concrete pad with transformer to be screened by landscaping. The transformer pad will be located on the west side of the building on Lot 3, as shown on the enclosed Site Plan. The utility will be screened by eight Smaragd Arborvitae planted around the perimeter, but open on one side for access to the cabinet. An updated Plant List with cost for Lot 3 is enclosed. Technology Park received Final Plat approval in 1996 for a 12-lot subdivision and 647 PM peak hour trips. Each subsequent Site Plan application for individual buildings on the lots within the park has provided estimated project -generated traffic estimates using the ITE Trip Generation Manual fitted curve equation for each use, as summarized in the table below. Table 1: Permitted Trips based on ITE Estimated Proiect-Generated Traffic !Fitted Curve Fountinnl location Use Estimated Trips Cumulative Trips Subdivision (8/6/96) permitted PM Peak Hour 129,343 ff2 office; 10,000 ff2 warehouse; 82,257 ff2 It manufacturing; Lot 8A - 30 Community Drive 10,000 ff2 indoor recreation; 404.17 trips 404.17 2,000 ff2 retail food; 41,000 ff2 R&D lab; 400 ff2 short order restaurant Lot 7 - 55 Community Drive 72,000 ff2 general office 159.5 trips 563.57 Lot 2 - 124 Tech Park Way 54,459 ff2 general office 139.8 trips 703.47 Lot 3 - 88 Tech Park Way 54,459 ff2 general office 139.8 trips 843.27 A traffic volume count was conducted between 1 /20/2015 to 1 /26/2015 for the purpose of determining existing peak hour traffic volume generated by the buildings located on Community Drive. Counts were taken from 4:00 to 6:00 PM at all of the driveways for both 30 Community Drive and 55 Community Drive. Peak hour traffic counts were also conducted at Technology Park Way from 1 /5/2015 to 1 /9/2015. All buildings within the park are currently fully occupied. The following table summarizes average PM peak hour trips for each building. Civil Engineering Land Surveying Landscape Architecture Environmental Services Page 2 of 2 88 Tech Park Way June 25, 2015 Table 2: Average PM Peak Traffic - Observed Location Trips Enter Exit Lot 8A - 30 Community Drive 392 trips 122 270 Lot 7 - 55 Community Drive 62 trips 14 48 Lot 2 - 124 Tech Park Way 77 trips 6 71 Observed PM peak hour traffic volumes were significantly lower than ITE estimates for the two office buildings in the park, located on Lot 7 and Lot 2. The mixed -use building on Lot 8A had traffic volume only slightly lower than the estimate. A meeting with the City engineer and planning staff resulted in agreement that it would be reasonable to base permitted trips for the 3 lots, and future lots, on the ITE Average Rate calculation, which calculates a number closer to the observed peak hour volume. The following table identifies the proposed trip allocation for each lot, including 88 Technology Park Way (highlighted), based on the ITE Average Rate calculation. Table 1 Proposed Trip Allocation Proposed Approval trips remaining Source Code Floor Area ITE Average Rate Subdivision Approval 647 647 s . ft. rate per 1000 SF Per Jan 2015 Count Lot 8A 30 Community Dr. 404.17 242.83 ITE/Local Approval 392 Lot 7 55 Community Dr. 108 134.83 ITE Av . Rate 710-Office 72,000 1.49 62 Lot 2 124 Tech Park Way 82 52.83 ITE Avg. Rate 710-Office 54,459 1.49 77 88 Tech Park Way 82 -29.17 ITE Avg. Rate 710-Office 54,459 1.49 77 est. 56.67 paid to City w/ Lot 2 app SP-07-67 VA Remaining allocation Based on our understanding of the requirements for Site Plan review, we believe the submittal of material for this proposed project to be complete. If you have any questions or comments regarding this application, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at abby.dery@tcevt.com. Regards, Abigail Dery Project Engineer cc: Evan Langfeldt Enclosed: Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Application, Fee, Plant List I r,� N/F CABLE HOLDCO EXCHANGE III, LLC J C 0 N/F RUBY B. WILLIS FAMILY TRUST N/F EDLUND COMPANY KIMBALL AVENUE ---- - -- I/ / � _ _ --��_. � _ _7:JRMWATER •-- - SvtiTFrs - - - a \ LOT 2 L/ 11 \ - ` �• \ \• \� I i /F TECHNOLOGY ARK PARTNERS j I I jI LOT1•; 124 TECHNOLOGY EXISTING 3 STORY PARKWAY BUILDING �{ � - -----•--ter i S I \ \\ \ \ IL X a I I -- i j LOT 14 N/F INVESTORS CORP. OF VT _- UIY FASEMEN! $BARED TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC -% LOT 3- � I I I t 2 I I 1. OVER c /. I POwFR EASE El I 25UNDERGROUND _ s' PROPOSED TELEPHONE EASEMEASEMENT j - - I I - PARKING _ - I LOT 4 N/F TECHNOLOGY _ 21 21 20 20- 20 2D 21 28 I I PARK PARTNERS I __ I - I I I O I I t ----- - I E55a 1 O , UiaITY liY EASEASEM EM � U - PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PAD1011-- - I .-----._ / E E SEMEN TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY ' PROPOSED 3 STORY I j II OFFICE BUILDING j II I FFE=348.33 I i li L N/F TECHNOLOGY LOT 6 A II PARK PARTNERS I PROJECT INFORMATION: 1. OWNER/APPLICANT: TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS, LLC 55 COMMUNITY DRIVE SUITE 402 SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05403 PHONE: (802) 860-1691 2. TAX PARCEL ID: 0436-0003003 3. DEED REFERENCE: v. 898 P. 210 SLIDES 510, 541 4. PARCEL SIZE: 3.98 ACRES 5. ZONING DISTRICT: MIXED INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL 6. BUILDING SIZE: 54,459 SF 7. PARKING SPACES: 3-5/1000 SF = 191 SPACES (OFFICE) PROVIDED: 192SPACES 8 ACCESSIBLE SPACES 8, LOT COVERAGE: a) BUILDING: EXISTING 10.47% PROPOSED 10.47% 78,152 S.F. 18.152 S.F. b) OVERALL (BUILDING & PARKING) EXISTING 57.44% PROPOSED 57.49% 99,583 S.F. 99,667 S.F. C) FRONT YARD (KIMBALL AVENUE) EXISTING 17.26% PROPOSED 17.26% 29.923 S.F. 29,923 S.F. 9. PARKING LOT: 60,952 SF 10. PARKING LOT ISLANDS: 6,923 SF (11.36%) 11. TRAFFIC: RE TRIP GENERATION, 9TH EDITION PM PEAK TRIPS T=LI2x+78.45=140 TRIPS ' 12. WATER DEMAND: 200 EMPLOYEES x 15 GPD/EMPLOYEE x 0.9 = 2700 GPD 13. SEWER DEMAND: 200 EMPLOYEES x 15 GPD/EMPLOYEE x 0.8 = 2400 GPD 14. BUILDING HEIGHT: MAX = 35 FT, PROPOSED = 50 FT: S0'-35' = 15' WAVER. SEE SETBACK CALCULATION' 14. SETBACK CALCULATION: IC MIN INCREASE' PROVIDED MIN FRONT: 50 FT 1x15'=15' 65 FT SIDE: 10 FT 0.5 x15' =7.5' 17.5 FT REAR: 30 FT 1 x 15'=15' 45 FT IS, REFER TO EASEMENT PLAT FOR DETAILS ON EASEMENTS. .tce RI' TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS Aga auR PUIk Row I 1eLLmaR. IcmlaRT (-95 an axs 8331 I 11ee.T4EV1.00Y Revsiens o_ Oescnption Date By Pile &oce 03/23/2015 AAD ® Wf CovnaRe for Poo .1211WI5 AAC - 100104, FIR- 17i�.- I PROJECT LOCATION use ITne d wiry I u le ne«: a. rne:e rx ' n i a a lot I p 'M Ma tl 01 / oPp di the g boN tniwri" ded M1 dr wiry uMe tetl d war a tr re b rnr'h. p h 1 IM1 y 1e - tl opq etl. p d tl aui 135. D- tl II nan I n w ppa ue pori /d 'pr es B Mt11 f1l, E 9 er d th A t '• M P rry 1 d' dry. but :nll ed h ttl h I was / for agr .b Id 1g tl I pobn . IY ntl pabbc tl ie p t.- permits c t i 3.0 tl M1I spo bl I tl pas d tptio 1 btrtld- g sho dvy d a -' i ISI t d b Idi1y d d nR E pmt'ty t' n P1i ®nese Pbns for conshpcio pyoal. ne user Snap ICE 1. ensure the pleas coma ass the mast s. Tn a- iP spe E I ne 1 d t Inn, ae. A anKm a ne ar 9 prw cop Iner. i I- by TCE q edy. Chon d g ay ryba tl by icE. n a a Pass sno oe tr 9nl to rn d ICE' aiat y, 6. If k ne U sp biG y to op 1 ins Ina most cola r ass. M Unsore, pkbse confocf TCE. °uo'NE � ER "� EII1111 \ For ConsEtruction 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington, Vermont Overall Site Plan %qac+Numb1.. _ 201xOB8 pa nBy NPC Project En9irgei: AAD Approved By: Fall Bock: Graphic Scale Feet 10 0 SO 100 ISO 2D0 C2-01 KIMBALL AVENUE y 3<J 1 77 48' CONTRACTOR TO VERI UTILITY IOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS IOR TO -- FI AND OUT-F' CATCH BASIN SUBMITTAL/FAB CATION - \ " 1 336 J' �- /VERIFY 1 1� 7- CONTRACTOR TO UTILITY W SEE DETAIL SHEET C8 114 LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO S 111 -- - MODIFICATIONS CATCH BASIN SUBMITTAL/FABRICATION _FOR 5O'MED INV' d 5 ' W) 338.08 J Gc 0 TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC = LOT 3 _ 3g, � 3.9E AC'REi 314 // - iDPE ___ _ yQpE I \ I INpRE 3a9 C.O. I R IZHDPLI_ L� r r� I I Firth{ _ l DROP IN 41 ' CURB, RI { M=FRED33Y.4 CROSSING S E_-MOU... g I LED LU iOUT=335.;1n' 0e0 PAVEMENT JOINT ` �- - . (SEE OETAIL) I -..� -Hf 1 - STRIPED CROSSWALK I - CR Is" FE H 33;- _ 11.H1> f I t3a.07 Ur!12 334 to ;MH2 I q I I vRT'. IP (81 "J 331(, - - WELANDounrr LOT2- -- I i� llo n 33d 35 STORMWATER SYSTEM.=3333H OX3 332.87 r A) I 337 30 "'i \� . _--. I I I C.O. i FUTURE EV \ DMH -8 I I .CHARGING RIM-339.63 I STATIONS �~ H CAP ACCESSIBLE - z IIJ1 2333.0E w I I \ 7L RIM- 1425 r r I I SIGN _ 2 1' i a 00Tr:333.0OU- I a N =33:336.G' I I CONDUIT -.a ° Au. FUEL SNOW 117.22. USE PATH 3y - - --3M _ `r I VEN PARKING III .� o..w. -i �C.O C- _ ALT. �. .-�FUEL M-3431=ED VEHICLE -n i0ui-333.57 CB #31 PARKING- - -C_.Od�.RIM-339.97 INRI ()L)339 CB 3-5 0(,T 338.I8 HOPE Rm 34349 LA5551 WATER MAIN E�33637 WATER-33Aw7T 81RIM- IN(8)33DRAIN=3392 , 1 . OUT 3397t --- - - I CB Y3-7 DROP CURB AND ACCESSIBLE ENTRY PEDESTRIAN CROSSING - (RA1M$t�121 l=3-62 i iWAITNEv==3D4#7z380 3DRAB PROPOSED PAD WITM BIKE RACKS f NEW I ,. TRAN$ 3RMER SEWER SERVICE CONNECTROOFDRAIN r' !� -- 124 TECHNOLOGY PARKWAY PAD i=3a1.70 TO EXISTINGSTUB \ �o WATER=338. ` OUT G STUB C.O. I hSM.N i AS'L , I i � I �I I 01----+- - -- 1 II T END Of CURB FUTURE PHASE 2 CONCRETE GENERATOR PAD CB #3-6 rcm ' I 12 /DPE --o -_ e TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY EXISTING STORMWATER �4 NAME RIM iIN iOUi TYPE DMH#1 34- 340.50 1 340.53 N/A e, 9 \ I EXISTING 3 STORY BUILDING (DRAIN-33C3 8" DI CL52 WATER SERVICE (OUT=338.8 - f ' `;, PROPOSED - FIBER OPTIC CONNECTION 3STORY I v`A IN -LINE DRAIN OFFICE BUILDING SUMP W/ PUMP UPPER SLAB FOOTING FFE=348.33 j LOWERS LAB FD. DRAIN E.EV =343± BASEMENT FD. '§. REMOVE CAP CO - NEC TO EXISTING -_ I I jjj�YYYII'I DR«CURB :.. I` jj I i ` -- ( •� SEE CT STRUURAL FOR DETAIL - I PVC SEWER STUB CLEANOUT(TYP.) I PROPOSED ER AWITH 6UMIGHT ARE BRICK 1 F EE MECH DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS i P _ " -'- _. WALL SCREENING. ARCH PLANS _ AIL L P AN FOR ITECTUR - DET - _..__ _ 3`� LOT 3 PROPOSED STORM W ATER NAME RIM I iIN - iIN OUT TYPE 15"HDPE IN N/A 344.25 N/A N/A INLET CB #3-7 345.25 6) 340.16 (2") 340.3 1 340.0 B CS #3-6 348.71 N/A N/A 3a3.26 B CB #3-5 347.10 341.45 N/A 341.35 B CB #3-4 344.23 115") 339.28 )12') 339.28 339.18 B CB #3-3 349.81 N/A N/A 343.58 B CB#3-2 34633 (15'S)336.96 (1S'E339.75 336.86 8 CS #3-1 345.00 (IB") 336.03 (IS) 339.75 335.93 B 18"HDPE OUT 334.58 334.5E 334.58 N/A OUTLET YD #2 346.75 N/A N/A 343.75 YARD DRAIN YD#1 347.70 343.00 N/A N/A YARD DRAW - \ I=341.00 � i I NOTES: -- - --- -- _ STAIRS K WALL 41 I I ° 1 POWER TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS. i 8Y OTHERS / SEE ARCH DRAWINGS PEDESTALS AND CONDUITS TO BEFINALIZED BY FOR FOOTING DRAIN ELECTRIC CONTRACTOR. DETAIL (UPPER A LOWER I I 2 FOOTING DRAINS PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS, COORDINATE WITH MEP DRAWINGS. OUTDOOR PATIO (SEE ''T P. M ) I 3, LIGHT POLE LOCATION FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES CB-05 FOR GRADING ONLY. SEE LIGHTING PLAN FOR FINAL HEIGHT AND DESIGN AND DETAILS I I LOCATION. DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER. 4- CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PIPE SIZES PRIOR TO ORDERING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. Graphic Scale feet 30 0 % 60 90 120 tce TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 1]8 . BLA#t PARK ROM I N6LKTOH. tab10NT 05195 R02 BT9 R33t RNW.TCEW.CpI ..'.on DPI. By Q i.SEWER NOTES 02/I9/IS AAD BID 03/05/15 AAD 03/23/15 AAD Q s. SERVICE a ELEC PAD 06/23/15 AAD I Toe a Pr l Pp I,o- me e m ntlea m,cl a ry ree Ppo.ee by. regu h ' 1 reY a etl. PC etl. a m gn b tln .M PP, b - /O pl nes ' _9 .' Ege tl e<. m po r opens m ee' a g. out tl 1.a / n buua rg a 1 arou na ce Im+: 1" ce - sP ae la fn. d gn one I bu,Ungz Mwn.. 0 y an ore. meosuree. f IS)1 O tw Ong.ntl word n.tirg t' sinown on these Pans g ne en-s for.onsrru..Ily- th,e TCE a he pbn co - P 1 e P- 9 Pa T I Hop tl of we , 1 g� antl f n by ICE e' - perry. ayes ro me tlrowirgz y on Y bo by ICE 11 T- tl nev soon bo dou9hl to coPY coma nz Ine .. please contact ICE `` YUUutnnfizj��, For COnST`rUCtion 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington, Vermont Site Plan w3� Prgecl Number. _. 201 a0RB -, D,b-BY: N� ProWr Enginee, C2-02 a PLANT LIST KEY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE COMMENTS AR A—.bnan Red Maple 2 2 1/2"3" BBB Red Sunset' AC AmefarichieF canade.Ws Servicebeery 8 6.6 BBB SINGLE STEM CR con— racemasa Gray DOW—d 11 2 gat, CONT CSI Lanus sericea Red4wi9 12 3ga1. CONT. �-'�--"-----._ isanty Dlgvmd N IIeX xedilftefe Am Dandy 8 Berry Nice 11 3 gal. COW '.km Gandy 8 Beny Nice Winerbeny - - Gi5 GJadiDne Macanth08 Shademaster 32 2112"-3" B88 - Shademaslee Hweylwust 1 J18H Junipers hmzonfalrs Creeping Juniper 322 2 gat. CONT - , _{ 9er Harbor' EXIST. EVERGREENS ---� - FP Fithica dufe mbm M..db,.Y"eet 157 2 gal. CONT L �..0 - Vennee- •- t - MSA Malus sargmrk Sargent Crabapple 6 2 112"3' BBB PC Pyres calle - Cl..I..d Select Pear 8 2 1/2"3' BBB Chanticleer PG Pica glalrca White Sprure 3 fi'-T 88B —�-__--- PN Pinus ro9m• AusMan Pine 3 fi'-T 88B - PS Plnus stmbus White Pine 4 6'-71 BBB OP Quercus pakstnls Pin Oak 15 TRANSPLANT FROM ALONG 1, TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY ENS Sprees rappmia Snovanwnd Spires 82 3 gal. CONT — 'Sri--Nf SR Sydrga reftculata Japanese Tree Lilac 18 21/23" BBB SJS Spree tia/wruca Sltilnbena SPiraen 29 3 gel. CONT Shirob.na' ----- ---- TC TaXuS cuspciata Japanese Yew 118 18"-24" CONT.- • Nan. 1 7CB Th1y'a wcidanalis 'S—,.gd' Smamgd Arb.,A- 17 5'E' 88B .JR cA)�_rP� �N vno B' LAYER SHREDDED BARK MULCH (TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE D ARCHIT I) OVER PERMEABLE AAR DO NOT PLACE ®ii-F OSE IO CLOSE MAIN STEM p 3 SAUCER RIM — SACKNLL WITH EXCAVAIED MATERIAL. IF SOIL IS PREDOMINATELY CLAY OR GRAVEL INCORPORATE ORGANIC MATERIAL AS DIRECTED I AND APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PLAIT Pli ]% J B01APLANT BALL DIA NOTES: 'WHICSHRUBDEPTH Ai -DPR WHICH SHRUB NAD PREVIpUSIY GROWN 'LOOSEN, CUT, 6 REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 113 OF ROOT BALL 'SHREDDED BARK MULCH AND WEED BARRIER FABRIC TO BE CONTINUOUS WHEN USED IN BEDS. _ Y BALL AND BURLAP SHRUB uxte��x,.,x„ LET NOTES:' STAKE ONLY N EXTREMELY ". WINDY CONDITIONS AS APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT., �N • IF KNOWN, PLANT THIN BARKED TREES WITHRA THE SAME SUN OMENTAYLEN HWITHES ME SUNO RIENTATLENE RRLAP: WWRAP NATURAL LOOSEN. ILIURLAPROM TREMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 112 ROOT BAIL �m��REMOVESmtNETIC BURUP 01 SKETS: `CURE BASKETS:CUT I AW OM RINGSPARTIALLY BACKFILL THEN REMOVE REKMIHING WIREPLANT TREE TO EXPOSE ROOT FLAREMAIN ORDER ROOT, AND IN SAME ORTE Tl0NAS iREEWASGROWNDONOTPLANT TOO DEEP 2. DIA 3-LAYER SHREDDED BARK MULCMUCH RMG ITOM APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) OVER PERMEABLE WEED FABRIC. DO NOT PLACE NEXT TO ANCE TREE TRUNK SLOPE GROUNC IO DRAIN - 4" SAUCER RIM DIG TREE PIT ONLY AS 1 DEEP AS ROOT BALL 1 " BACKFILIWITHEXCAVATEO 1 MATERIAL. IF SOIL IS PREDOMINATELY CLAY OR GRAVEL INCORPORATE P.Avi PII nUDry ORGANIC MATERIAL M DIRECTED AND APPROVED 4 TREE PLANTING DETAIL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Y BOULDERS Graphic Seple Feet 30 0 30 60 90 120 tce k_ *10110* TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 4T8 BLAR PHBI RORD 1 i115TON, 10114 1T 05IRS BBR m snt I t1ltw.lavl.cbkl Revisions NoDe—tPhIP Date By QI iranxrormer Ppd Screening 0L/15/13 PAD Use of Ihme Drawings Unless oMerwue noted thew Drow;ngs .,I intended for seam — Pbnning. coo•ainalion witn other I—lclunx cl LNIPPs. and/I, I Y., from the regHIm- --tie, Thev ore not'—nded w conrruct aawings unless noted as such q markltl approved by o regvlofgy outhoMy. ]. BY use of these, dawings for conshuction of the Project. the Owner reges"" that Ihey trove reviewed, apgoved. Intl accepted the gowings. obfoirnd all necessary ..— mb hove met YnM It pPPli-cle ponies/discipknes cludn, .1 — rim".. In. the Engrneet ontl The Arctutec1. to im— Mere Pbns ore Moberly 1—Hinted includ,1g. bvl not --I to. —`— clot spec fkotion2, net/contractor ogree bilding Intl mecharical Mons, Mi P—C N.h.,d other pert lent permits fq< hu Non. 3. OWnFx Ind Are-h0eC1, I e responsible Iq fins design Intl or n of buildings shown, i—ding In area meosuretl a ,i 1m five 1511eet arI— any .11 ontl co—in, ^,mrtv conrnclions shown on lnese Moos. ... �� o us'rrp These pans Iq mnseuctbn lavoul, tin user ontoct ICE to ensure the pbn conleins the most 3. it eserprowings ae spacifK to Ine Project ontl are not mnsferoble. As Insrroments of 1-1, These drawingsontl copes Ihereol, famished by ICE IN In v 11Pve Mopedy. Crvor�ges t0 the dtowings may 11 be, mode by ICE ll Ire dlscova,ed, they — be bought to Me onCE immedlotely d. It Is the User s 11-9bikty ro ensure rh;s copy conroim the ns. It unswe, Muse contact ICE. aV`"E OF 5 FOYb �i Tti i = CIVIL nsu 111Y`��``` For Con'� nntruction R'ojecl nne 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington, Vermont STteel Title Landscaping Plan Date' 1013C/g4 sale: = 3D Prpecl Numbe. "I 086 Drown BY: NPC Project Enginer.. -.. ^AD Approved BY: It -Book: Ll -01 south urlington PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP- L- 44 (office use o Id ) 1 Y APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW e Administrative ❑ Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1.OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): Technology Park Campus, LLC 55 Community Drive, Suite 402, South Burlington, VT 05403 802-860-1691 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): v. 898, p. 210 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): same as Owner 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) attn: Abby Defy 478 Blair Park Road, Williston, VT 05495 (802) 879-6331 x 107 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: abby.dery@tcevt.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 88 Technology Park Way 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0436-00030.003 S75 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Reduce number of vehicle trips to 82 PM peak trips. Add transformer pad and screening. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): vacant, but permitted for 54,459 sq. ft. office building c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): no change in use d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 54,459 sq. ft. e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): 50 ft, 3 floors f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): not applicable g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): no change in number of employees h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Transit Overlay District Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 E 8. LOT COVERAGE a. Building: Total Parcel Size: 173369 Existing 10.47 % / Proposed 10.47 % / Sq. Ft. 18152 sq. ft. 18152 —sq.ft b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 57.44 % / 99,583 sq. ft. Proposed 57.49 % / 99,667 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing 17.26 % / 29,923 sq. ft. Proposed 17.26 % / 29,923 sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 100 SF * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ no change b. Landscaping: $ 1500 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): included in building cost 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 82 peak hour trips 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday through Friday 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Spring 2016 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. � G/� �i/�� @ ( %, VP /Ot �i� Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the informatio equested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowled TURE OF APPLICANT IGN- OF PROPERTY O ER �� P PRINT NAME �C•569p'"f"-'f3 Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: / REVIEW AUTHORITY: U Development Review Board a Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: LSComp. The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 1 Ad§� �_ TRUDELL C,eznclsca/�c r1 rchatcctr�hc- PLANT LIST 88 Technology Park Way 14-088 Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Ben Oxender 6/24/2015 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE PRICE/PLANT TOTAL Acerrubrum Red Maple 2 2 1/2"-3" $737.00 $1,474.00 'Red Sunset' Amelanchier canadensis Serviceberry 2 5'-6' $315.00 $630.00 SINGLE STEM Corpus racemosa Gray Dogwood 11 2 gal. $45.00 $495.00 Corpus sencea Red -twig 12 3 gal. $37.50 $450.00 'Isanti' Dogwood Ilex verticillata Jim Dandy & Berry Nice 11 3 gal. $67.50 $742.50 'Jim Dandy & Berry Nice' Winterberry Gleditsia triacanthos Shademaster 32 2 1/2"-3" $687.50 $22,000.00 'Shademaster' Honeylocust Juniperus horizontalis Creeping Juniper 322 2 gal. $40.00 $12,880.00 'Bar Harbor' Fillipendula rubra Meadowsweet 157 2 gal. $37.50 $5,887.50 Venusta' Malus sargentii Sargent Crabapple 6 2 1/2"-3" $580.00 $3,480.00 Pyrus calleryana Cleveland Select Pear 8 2 1/2"-3" $610.00 $4,880.00 'Chanticleer' Picea glauca White Spruce 3 6'-T $427.50 $1,282.50 Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 3 6'-7' $427.50 $1,282.50 Pinus strobus White Pine 4 6'-7' $315.00 $1,260.00 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 3 TRANSPLANT FROM ALONG TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY Spiraea nipponica Snowmound Spirea 17 3 gal. $37.50 $637.50 'Snowmound' Syringa reticulata Japanese Tree Lilac 18 2 1/2%3" $540.00 $9,720.00 Spiraea japonica Shirobana Spiraea 29 3 gal. $37.50 $1,087.50 'Shirobana' Taxus cuspidata Japanese Yew 118 18"-24" $105.00 $12,390.00 'Nana Thuia occidentalis Smaragd Arborvitae 8 5'-6 187.5 $1,500.00� Smaragd' TOTAL $82,079.00 es AM e f� south m rl ingion PLANNING & ZONING Planning and Zoning Invoice Non -Residential Impact & Permit Fees Property Owners Name: nw& 4�c 1414 , C A 4 Property Location: 54. big 1 Q6 00/ Amount:102 Payment Type: Date: 6 11�11'7 Code Pricing Amount Due Zoning Permit (Non-residential) ZP- / zp $13.00 q. ft. building Qa $0.35 per sq. ft. $ plus After -the -fact of (--j 5o% [no NOV] or (__) 1oo0/o [NOV] $ / h Zoning Permit Total $� Sewer Allocation Fee WWA- r / Oq #20 g.p.d x $10.35 $ (_) Ba ett Bay , \ ( irport Parkway Road Impact Fee #221 Fire Impact Fee #203 s r IT /6 Police Impact Fee #222 $ Dorset Street Waterline Fee #230 $ Sewer Connect Inspection WWI w�✓ $63 $ Total sl O� #SP-14-60 r The project proposes to disturb greater than 1 acre of land and create greater than 1 acre of impervious area. Therefore, it will need construction (3-9020) and operational (3-9015) stormwater permits from the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. The applicant should provide information on the existing State permit coverage for this project (permit number 1-1458) and how it will be updated/amended to facilitate this project. The applicant proposes to make changes to the extended detention wetland outlet located on lot 2. Provide updated hydrologic model information related to the detention wetland and its treatment/detention of runoff from lots 2 and 3. The DRB should confirm that the applicant has permission to make changes on adjacent lots (e.g. changes to wetland outlet, snow storage area shown crossing the lot boundary, and landscaping berm). My review assumes that these lots are also owned by Technology Park LLC, or that agreements are in place. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to regularly maintain all stormwater treatment and conveyance structures on site. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Thomas J. DiPietro Jr. Deputy Director Department of Public Works The Board confirms that the applicant has permission, either via ownership or via agreements, to make changes on adjacent lots (e.g. changes to wetland outlet, snow storage area shown crossing the lot boundary, and landscaping berm). The Board finds that the applicant shall comply with the recommendations of the Department of Public Works. DECISION Motion by �L f!�� seconded by O 4 Ato approve Site Plan Application #SP- 14-60 of Technology Campus, LLC, subject to the following conditions: All previous approvals and stipulations, which are not superseded by this approval, shall remain in effect. 2. This project shall be completed as shown on the plans submitted by the applicant and on file in the South Burlington Department of Planning and Zoning. The plans shall be revised to show the changes below and shall require approval of the Administrative Officer. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plans shall be submitted to the Administrative Officer prior to permit issuance. #SP-14-60 a. The plans lIJbe revised to comply with the comments of the City of South Burlington Departrptmt of Public Works per the email dated December 1, 2014. b, Thfe plans shall be revised to comply with the comments of the City Arborist per the memo dated December 1, 2014. 4. The Board grants a building height waiver of fifteen (15) feet for a maximum height of 50 feet. 5. The applicant shall obtain final wastewater allocation approval prior to the issuance of any zoning permits. 6. The applicant shall comply with the comments of the City of South Burlington Fire Department per the email dated December 1, 2014. r' �. /Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall provide information on the existing State permit coverage for this project (permit number 1-1458) and how it will be updated/amended to facilitate this project. Prior to permit issuance, the applicant shall provide updated hydrologic model information related to the detention wetland and its treatment/detention of runoff from lots 2 and 3. 9. The applicant shall regularly maintain all stormwater treatment and conveyance structures on site. 10. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan should meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The South Burlington Stormwater Superintendent shall visit the site as construction progresses to ensure compliance with this criterion. 11. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Development Review Board estimates that the proposed building will generate a total of 140 additional vtes. 12. Pursuant to Section 15.13(E) of the Land Development Regulations, any new utility lines, services, and service modifications should be underground. 13. Prior to zoning permit issuance for construction of the building, the applicant shall post a $59,891 landscaping bond. This bond shall remain in full effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping has taken root and has a good chance of survival. 14. The Board allows parking to be placed in the front of the building as shown on the plan as the lot has unique site conditions pursuant to Section 14.06 B.(2)(3) and finds that the proposed layout would not preclude the applicant's long-standing concept for a "quad". 15. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 17.04 of the Land Development Regulations or this approval is null and void. -9— 1� ) #SP-14-60 16. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from the Administrative Officer prior to the occupancy of the new building. 17. Any change to the site plan shall require approval of the South Burlington Development Review Board or the Administrative Officer. Tim Barritt Mark Behr Ye Nay Yea Abstain Not Present Brian Breslend Nay Abstain Not Presen Bill Miller a Nay Abstain Not Present David Parsons ea Nay Abstain Not Present Jennifer Smith Nay Abstain Not Present John Wilking Ye Nay Abstain Not Present e Nay Abstain Not Present Motion carried by a vote of 61 - 0 — 0. Signed this / 7 ay of / ' qv'-C� 2015, by Tim Barritt, C air Please note: You have the right to appeal this decision to the Vermont Environmental Court, pursuant to 24 VSA 4471 and VRCP 76 in writing, within 30 days of the date this decision is issued. The fee is $225.00. If you fail to appeal this decision, your right to challenge this decision at some future time may be lost because you waited too long. You will be bound by the decision, pursuant to 24 VSA 4472 (d) (exclusivity of remedy; finality). -10— Justin Rabidoux From: Evan Langfeldt <EvanL@rearchcompany.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 4:14 PM To: Paul Conner; Justin Rabidoux; Kevin Dorn Cc: John Illick; abby.dery@tcevt.com; Jeremy Matosky, P.E. Subject: Follow up regarding trip generations at Technology Park Paul, Justin and Kevin, Thank you for taking the time to meet with me yesterday to discuss the trip generation issue for our properties at Technology Park. As discussed and as we all agreed, it appears as though there is a fairly significant flaw in the weighted approach to the ITE calculation for general office use when considering the scale of ou ..bui in s vers the preponderance of data points provided by the ITE reference manuals. Instead, th average approac s ems better suited to deal with our buildings, although even it is flawed as you'll see from the calculations below compared with what our actual traffic analysis of the buildings show. However, based upon our conversation we would like to move forward in receiving our permit with the approved estimated PM Peak Hour Trips of 140 with the understanding that both we and City staff do not agree with this number and it is simply being used as a "placeholder" to allow us to receive our permit, after which an amendment will be filed with the DRB and which will be supported by City staff to change the weighted approach to the average approach, which while still flawed is at least much closer to the actual recorded trip generation of the existing buildings. In order to do so we understand that it is necessary for us to pay the trip generation fee based upon the ITE estimate upon which the permit is based and which we are agreeing to do, once again with the understanding that we will be refunded an amount equal to the cost of the delta between Technology Park's original 647 trip ends and the cumulative estimated average approach trip ends for all existing buildings at Technology Park (with the exception of 30 Community Drive for which the actual recorded trip counts are fairly closely aligned with the weighted approach). This calculation is shown below and which equals a surplus of trip ends after accounting for 88 Technology Park Way that is equal to 27.5 remaining trip ends. We are not necessarily seeking to have the City reimburse us for those costs, but simply to have that surplus of trip ends as remaining allocation for future Technology Park buildings. Furthermore, because even the average approach seems to at least show significant flaws in relation to the actual trip generation recorded at 55 Community Drive we support City staff's suggestion that a City-wide analysis of actual trip end generation of local office space is warranted and would be a worthwhile exercise, with the intention of using more accurate and appropriate data to determine these fees. We believe that we should only be paying for the actual trips that our buildings and properties generate and considering we are at 100% occupancy in a fairly unique and definable office environment here at Technology Park, it is reasonable to think that the best information to be used is the actual information on hand. Please review the below information which was provided by Abby Dery of Trudell Consulting Engineers and let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thank you for efforts in working through this issue to find an equitable solution. Best regards, Evan Technology Paris - Proposed Proiect-Generated Traffic Calculation Approval trips remaining Source Code Use Floor Area ITE Average Rate Per ion 2015 Subdivision Accrc. rate - `' - Count Lot 8A - I Drive - - - _e2.83 ITE/Local - Lot 7 == ::ommunit Drive 3 -= 23 ITE Avg. - Office CY -_ Lot 2 = Tech Park Way 82 183 ITE Avg. Ra,,E- Office -.<54; -_ 52 -- Lot 3 : c Tech Park Way g^ -29.17 ITE Avg. Rate Office 51.-5? -= 32 -- = b7 paid to City v. --P-,-; -o7j ,27.5 Remaining allocation MWA i South Burlington Planning Zoning S New Non -Residential Construction Impact Fees Project Completed by April 1, 2016 OTHER CREDITS: NET ROAD IMPACT FEE $136,651.57 Police Impact Fee Square Feet of New Structure or Addition Base Fee: Square feet of existing structure to be removed Creditable amount Existing Single family homes to be removed Existing 2-3 Family structures to be removed Existing 4+ Family Structures to be removed Creditable Amount Current Grand List Value of Site Past Payments credit: Estimated Post -Construction Value Future payments credit: NET POLICE IMPACT FEE 54459 $12, 948.17 $0.00 $0.00 200000 $94.00 $5,228,064.00 $836.49 $12,017.68 TABLE PD-7 ESTIMATED POST -DEVELOPMENT VALUES PER SQUARE FOOT OF FLOOR SPACE Type of Use _ _ _ Industrial/Manufa Engineerin Office Medical I General Auto Elderly Motels cturing g and (General) Office Retail Service i Care Fireproofed Steel Sketloton or $76 �— $100 $141 $152 $96 NA $117 NA Reinforced Concrete Structure 54,459 SF Masonry or Concrete Bearing $56 $79 $110 $129 $81 $62 $96 $85 Wall Structure SF Wood Frame Structure $53 $74 $106 $126 $79 $58 $93 $82 SF Pre -Fab Steel Structure $53 $73 $101 $119 $77 $47 $89 $82 SF South Burlington Planning Zoning �P'l 'now% New Non -Residential Construction Impact Fees Project Completed by April 1, 2o16 Project Name & Address 88 Technology Park Way Property Owner Technology Park Campus, LLC Effective Date TOTAL IMPACT FEE $158,593.1 Fire Impact Fees: Value of New Construction: Type of Construction Type of Use Fireproofed Steel Skeleton or Reinforced Concrete S66 S88 5123 5133 S94 5102 Masonry Wood SF or SF Frame SF Concrete Structure Bearing Pre -Fab Steel Structure SF Industrial/Manufactu ring Engineering & Research General Office Medical Office S69 S65 S64 S96 S93 S88 S113 S110 S69 S104 S71 S67 General Retail - S54 I S84 S741 - S51 S41 Auto Service Facilitv Elder Care Facility S81 S72 S78 S72 Sprinkler credit? (Enter 1 if yes) Total Value of New Structure: Total Value of New Structure & Contents: Current grand list value of property: Past payments credit: Post construction value of structure & land Future payments credit: Base fee: NET FIRE PROTECTION IMPACT FEE: Road Impact Fee PM Peak Hour VTEs Past payments credit: Future payments credit: 1 $ 6, 698,457 $16, 746,143 $200,000 $174.00 $6,898,457.00 $0.00 $10,097.92 $9,923.92 140 $362.49 $2,966.34 ray From: Abby A. Dery, P.E. <Abby.Dery@tcevt.com> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 11:40 AM To: ray Cc: EvanL@rearchcompany.com Subject: 88 Tech Park Way - Impact Fees Hi Ray - Would you please provide Technology Park with a summary of the impact fees required to obtain the Lot 3 Zoning Permit? Construction type is steel framing with concrete floors on steel deck, and masonry or concrete exterior materials. Regards, Abigail Dery, P.E. Project Engineer e. <-Ibby.Dera@tcevt.com p. 802.879.6331 x107 f. 802.978.0060 TRUDELL Con'sudtiug Engineers Civil Engineering Land Surveying Landscape Architecture Environmental Services =178 Blair Park Road, Villiston, I/ermont 05495 www.tceyt.com `'A Please consider the environment before printing this email l7' �-27 4 (�-(D Vze" 1 ,.LLB Acd - March 31, 2015 Peter Keibel Act 250 District 4 Coordinator 1 1 1 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Subject: Technology Park - Lot 3 Dear Peter: TRUDELL Consi dting Engineers On behalf of Technology Park Campus, LLC, we are submitting the following information as requested in the Draft notice for this project. 1. Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit issued by the ANR-DEC Wastewater Management Division. A permit has been issued by Wastewater Management. See attached. 2. Construction General Permit issued by the ANR-DEC Watershed Management Division. This application is currently under review by Watershed Management. The project will be receiving a Moderate Risk permit. Sheets 5-01 has been modified and new sheets C5-02 and C5-03 have been added to the permit plan set. 3. Stormwater Discharge Permit issued by the ANR-DEC Watershed Management Division or a letter from ANR indicating that one is not needed. See attached e-mail from Watershed Management indicating that no new permit is required. An Engineering Feasibility Analysis (EFA) showing how the existing system will be modified to meet current Guidelines was submitted to the State and deemed acceptable. 4. Revised Site Plan showing locations of electric vehicle charging station infrastructure Infrastructure for the electric vehicle charging station has been shown on the Site Plan C2-02. See attached. 5. Signal warrant analysis and South Burlington Capital Plan The signal warrant analysis for Community East and Kimball Avenue indicates that two of the eight signal warrants are still met, based on the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) -Warrant 2: Four Hour Volume and Warrant 3: Peak Hour Civii-Engisaeer. ng Laud Sorveying Landscape Architecture Environmewat Services Page 2 of 4 volume. These were identified in the 2007 Report for Lot 2, as well as the 2001 comprehensive traffic report for the park, however signals were not recommended. No new warrants are met as a result of the proposed project on Lot 3 and a signal is still not recommended at this time in this location. Site distance constraints still exist, as identified in previous impact studies, and a connection to Tilley Drive is a possibility within the next 7 years as indicated in the City of South Burlington Capital Plan, in which case Community West would be a more appropriate location for a signal. The City has indicated they are comfortable with the operation of the 4-way stop intersection now and with the addition of project traffic. They will continue to monitor the area's transportation network as future park expansion occurs, as outlined in the review comments by Public Works included with this application. While a condition in the draft permit outlined possible fair share contribution toward future traffic mitigation, our review of the Act 145 document noted that section 6106.(b)(1) reads "When determining a transportation impact fee the DC may adjust the result of the formula to account for one or more of the following ... a traffic allocation, if any, set for the land use project by a prior permit." Given there are 102 PM peak trips left in the park's allocation and this application is for 77 PM peak trips, the Commission should consider adjusting the fee to 0 for this building, as the developer would otherwise in effect be paying twice for the same mitigation which seemingly is in direct conflict with the intent of Act 145. In addition, no mitigation is being required by the City for traffic impacts from the proposed building at this time due to their own analysis by the City of South Burlington's Department of Public Works and the ruling of the Development Review Board. Technology Park has a history of following through with mitigation requirements. The comprehensive traffic report for the build -out of Technology Park, submitted with application materials in 2001 for Lot 7, recommended that left turn lanes be installed on Kimball Avenue and on Community East prior to the construction of the building on Lot 7. This mitigation was completed. Community Drive has been widened and improved to provide a shoulder and curbing, and either sidewalk or shared use path has been constructed around the perimeter. A shared use path was also constructed to provide connection to Tilley Drive for pedestrians. These were all requirements which were met and funded in full by the developer. It is our understanding that there may be precedent on other projects where a previous allocation of trip ends existed but the developer had not met their prior mitigation obligations and so the DC ruled that a fair share contribution was necessary despite remaining allocation. That is not the case in the instance of Technology Park as we have met all previous mitigation requirements. Page 3 of 4 As requested, a copy of the City's Capital Plan is attached. Projects in the area include a Kimball Avenue recreation path connection to the Town of Williston and the Tilley Drive/Community Drive connection - FY 2023 - $250,000. No other traffic improvements are currently proposed or requested by the City of South Burlington. 7. COMcheck Interior Lighting and Mechanical - signed compliant forms Enclosed is the completed and signed COMcheck Mechanical form. New England Air Systems completed the Mechanical form, and has indicated that there are no specific energy code requirements for a hot water unit heater. If the unit heaters were fueled by natural gas, oil, or propane there would be specific requirements. However, for hot water unit heaters there are no efficiency requirements. Interior Lighting will be provided when available, but it is anticipated that this will be compliant, as LED fixtures will be used. 8. Question 9L of Schedule B was answered incorrectly. The proposed project is not within an area designated pursuant to 24 VSA Chapter 76. Revise all answers and provide detailed justifications. See revised 9L of Schedule B attached. While the project is not inside a downtown development district or neighborhood development designated under 24 V.S.A., chapter 76A, the project is located inside an existing settlement, as evidenced by its existing water, sewer, sidewalk, and transit infrastructure. Through the permitting process, plans have been revised since this application was initially submitted. See summary below of specific plan revisions: C2-02 - Site Plan: • Label sewer service size material • Label water service size material • Update standard notes on title block • Add conduit for EV charging stations • Identify alternate fuel or fuel efficient vehicle designated spaces C5-01 - Now labeled as Pre -Construction Plan: • New plan illustrating erosion control measures to be installed prior to construction. • Project boundary and phases are also identified on this plan. Page 4 of 4 CS-02 - EPSC Plan (previously called C5-01) • Identify temporary stockpile areas. • Delineate project boundary • Outline phased construction areas. • Finalize silt fence location C5-03 Stabilization Plan New plan containing Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Narrative Also enclosed is a revised copy of the Waste Reduction Management Plans, per comments received from the Solid Waste Management Program. Please let me know if you have any additional questions or comments. Very truly yours, Abigail Dery, P.E. Project Manager cc: Evan Langfeldt Enclosed: Mechanical COMcheck Signal Warrant Analysis Schedule B - Criterion 9L Revised Waste Reduction Management Plan South Burlington Capital Improvements Stormwater EFA e-mail W W-4-441 1 C2 -01 Site Plan C5-01 Pre -Construction Plan C5-02 EPSC Plan C5-03 Stabilization Plan Civil Engineering Land Surveying Landscape Arcbitecture Environmental Services CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify on this 31=t day of March, 2015, a copy of the foregoing Draft Permit Response Letter and Plans, associated with permit #4C0190-10, was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the following individuals without email addresses and by email to the individuals with email addresses listed. Note: any recipient may change its preferred method of receiving notices and other documents by contacting TCE at the mailing address or email below. If you have elected to receive notices and other documents by email, it is your responsibility to notify our office of any email address changes. Act 250 District 4 Natural Resources Board 1 1 1 West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452 Peter.keibel@state.vt.us Technology Park Campus, LLC 55 Community Drive, Suite 402 South Burlington, VT 05403 evanl@rearchcomr)any.com Donna Kinville, City Clerk Chair, City Council/Chair, City Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset St South Burlington, VT 05403 Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 1 10 West Canal Street, Suite 202 Winooski, VT 05404 rmahonev@ccrpcvt.org Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney/ANR 1 National Life Drive, Davis 2 Montpelier, VT 05602-3901 anr.act250@state.vt.us Dated at Williston, Vermont, this 315` day of March, 2015. Abigail Dery, P.E. Trudell Consulting Engineers 478 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 802-879-6331 x107 Abby.dery@tcevt.com COMcheck Software Version 3.9.4 144 Mechanical Compliance Certificate 2011 Vermont Commercial Building Energy Standards Section 1: Project Information Project Type: New Construction Project Title: 88 Tech Park Way Construction Site: Owner/Agent: Designer/Contractor: 88 Tech Park Way Rearch Company South Burlington, VT 05403 55 Community Dr Suite 402 South Burlington, VT 05403 Section 2: General Information Building Location (for weather data): South Burlington, Vermont Climate Zone: 6a Section 3: Mechanical Systems List Quantity System Type S Description 1 Heat Pump 1 (Single Zone) : Water Source Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 28 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 4.70 COP, Required Efficiency = 4.20 COP Cooling Mode: Capacity = 25 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 14.40 EER, Required Efficiency = 12.00 EER Fan System: None 1 Heat Pump 2 (Single Zone) : Water Source Heat Pump Heating Mode: Capacity = 57 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 4.70 COP, Required Efficiency = 4.20 COP Cooling Mode: Capacity = 48 kBtu/h, Proposed Efficiency = 14.10 EER, Required Efficiency = 12.00 EER Fan System: None 3 Cabinet Unit Heaters (Single Zone) : Heating: 1 each - Unit Heater, Hot Water, Capacity = 30 kBtu/h No minimum efficiency requirement applies Fan System: None 2 Boilers. Heating: Hot Water Boiler, Capacity 1050 kBtu/h, Gas, with Waterloop Heat Pump Proposed Efficiency: 94.00 % Et, Required Efficiency: 80.00 % Et Section 4: Requirements Checklist Requirements Specific To: Heat Pump 1 : 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Heat Pump: 4.20 COP 12.00 EER ® 2. Heat pumps having supplementary electric resistance heat are prohibited cA 3. Loop temperature controlled with 20 degrees F deadband where neither cooling tower/fluid cooler nor boiler can operate Sh 4. Two -position valve on each heat pump having total heat pump system power >10hp /// Requirements Specific To: Heat Pump 2 : 1. Equipment minimum efficiency: Heat Pump: 4.20 COP 12.00 EER 2. Heat pumps having supplementary electric resistance heat are prohibited Project Title: 88 Tech Park Way Report date: 03/31/15 Data filename: C:\Users\wmanderson\Documents\COMcheck\88 TP Way.cck Page 1 of 3 3. Loop temperature controlled with 20 degrees F deadband where neither cooling tower/fluid cooler nor boiler can operate 4. Two -position valve on each heat pump having total heat pump system power >10hp Requirements Specific To: Cabinet Unit Heaters: None Requirements Specific To: Boilers: S11. Equipment minimum efficiency: Boiler Thermal Efficiency 80% Et Sd 2. Loop temperature controlled with 20 degrees F deadband where neither cooling tower/fluid cooler nor boiler can operate 3. Two -position valve on each heat pump having total heat pump system power >10hp 4. Systems with multiple boilers have automatic controls capable of sequencing boiler operation 5. Hydronic heating systems comprised of a single boiler and >500 kBtu/h input design capacity include either a multistaged or modulating_ bumer Generic Requirements: Must be met by all systems to which the requirement is applicable: 1. Electric resistance space heating. Building heating with electrical resistance units, including baseboard radiation, heat pump reheat coils, duct coils, boilers, domestic hot water heaters and coils in terminal units and air systems, is prohibited. Exception(s): ❑ Areas, such as stairways, that are not permitted to be penetrated with piping or duct and no other method of heating is possible. ❑ Replacement of existing electrical resistance unit. ❑ Special conditions of occupancy or use that require electrical resistance heat to maintain health, safety or environmental conditions. LJ Limited areas where a practical application of resistance electrical heat is demonstrated (e.g., small interior space such as a rest room which is distant from the distribution system, hazardous material storerooms, stairwell or other means of emergency egress). ❑ Domestic hot water heaters less than 5 kW in total unit input capacity. 2. Plant equipment and system capacity no greater than needed to meet loads Exception(s): J Standby equipment automatically off when primary system is operating ❑ Multiple units controlled to sequence operation as a function of load 3. Minimum one temperature control device per system NLA L7 4. Minimum one humidity control device per installed humidification/dehumidification system NIA y 5. Load calculations per ASHRAE/ACCA Standard 183. 6. Automatic Controls: Setback to 55"F (heat) and 85"F (cool); 7-day clock, 2-hour occupant override, 10-hour backup Exception(s): LI Continuously operating zones ❑ 2 kW demand or less, submit calculations 7. Outside -air source for ventilation; system capable of reducing OSA to required minimum (per ASHRAE 62.1-2007) Sd 8. R-8 supply and return air duct insulation in unconditioned spaces R-10 supply and return air duct insulation outside the building R-10 insulation between ducts and the building exterior when ducts are part of a building assembly Exception(s): ❑ Ducts located within equipment ❑ Ducts with interior and exterior temperature difference not exceeding 15°F. 9. Ducts sealed - longitudinal seams on rigid ducts; transverse seams on all ducts; UL 181A or 181 B tapes and mastics �l 10.Pipe serving heating and/or cooling systems is insulated per Section 503.2.8. General applicable insulation requirements are: Fluid Temp Range (°F) > 350 : < 1.0" pipe = 2.5" insulation, >1.0" and <4.0" = 3.0" insulation, otherwise 4.0" insulation 251-350 : < 1.0" pipe = 1.5" insulation, < 1.5" pipe = 2.5" insulation, otherwise 3.0" insulation 201-250 : < 1.5" pipe = 1.5" insulation, otherwise 2.0" insulation 141-200 : < 4.0" pipe = 1.0" insulation, otherwise 1.5" insulation 105-140 : < 1.5" pipe = 0.5" insulation, otherwise 1.0" insulation 40-60 : < 1.5" pipe = 0.5" insulation, otherwise 1.0" insulation < 40 : < 8.0" pipe = 1.0" insulation, otherwise 1.5" insulation Exception(s): ❑ Piping within HVAC equipment. LJ Fluid temperatures between 60 and 105"F. ❑ Fluid not heated or cooled with renewable energy. U Piping within room fan -coil (with AHR1440 rating) and unit ventilators (with AHRI840 rating). ❑ Strainers and valves associated with piping <= 1.0". 11.0peration and maintenance manual provided to building owner Project Title: 88 Tech Park Way Report date: 03/31/15 Data filename: C:\Users\wmanderson\Documents\COMcheck\88 TP Way.cck Page 2 of 3 12.Temperature reset by representative building loads in pumping systems >10 hp for chiller and boiler systems >300,000 Btu/h. Exception(s): ❑ Reset controls canot be implemented without causing improper operation ❑ Hydronic systems using variable flow to reduce energy 14 13.Demand control ventilation (DCV) present for high design occupancy areas (>40 person/1000 ft2 in spaces >500 1111:2) and served by systems with any one of 1) an air -side economizer, 2) automatic modulating control of the outdoor air damper, or 3) a design outdoor airflow greater than 3000 cfm. Exception(s): ❑ Systems with heat recovery. ❑ Multiple -zone systems without DDC of individual zones communicating with a central control panel. ❑ Systems with a design outdoor airflow less than 1200 cfm. ❑ Spaces where the supply airflow rate minus any makeup or outgoing transfer air requirement is less than 1200 cfm. U Ventilation for process loads only. 9 14.Total cooling capacity without economizers must be less than 480,000 Btu/h per building, or 20 percent of its air economizer capacity, whichever is greater. 15. Motorized, automatic shutoff dampers required on exhaust and outdoor air supply openings Exception(s): LJ Gravity dampers acceptable in buildings <3 stories ❑ 16.Automatic controls for freeze protection systems present 17.Three-pipe systems not used 18. Exhaust air heat recovery included for systems having supply airflow rate of a fan system of 5,000 cfm or greater and a minimum outside air supply of 70 percent or greater of the design supply air quantity, or specifically exempted Exception(s): ❑ Hazardous exhaust systems, commercial kitchen and clothes dryer exhaust systems that the International Mechanical Code prohibits the use of energy recovery systems. L] Systems serving spaces that are heated and not cooled to less than 60°F. ❑ Where more than 60 percent of the outdoor heating energy is provided from site -recovered or site solar energy. ❑ Heating energy recovery in climate zones 1 or 2. LJ Systems requiring dehumidification that employ energy recovery in series with the cooling coil. ❑ Laboratory fume hood exhaust systems that have either a variable air volume system capable of reducing exhaust and makeup air volume to 50 percent or less of design values or, a separate make up air supply meeting the following makeup air requirements: a) at least 75 percent of exhaust flow rate, b) heated to no more than 2°F above room setpoint temperature, c) cooled to no lower than 3°F below room setpoint temperature, d) no humidification added, e) no simultaneous heating and cooling. Section 5: Compliance Statement Compliance Statement: The proposed mechanical design represented in this document is consistent with the building plans, specifications and other calculations submitted with this permit application. The proposed mechanical systems have been designed to meet the 2011 Vermont Commercial Building Energy Standards, Chapter 8, requirements in COMcheck Version 3.9.4 and to comply with the mandatory requirements in the Requirements Checklist. r 3/T111_5 wl'tl4t_6 mo�x Anj&-50'n eo. W_- A — Name - Title Signature Date Section 6: Post Construction Compliance Statement ❑ HVAC record drawings of the actual installation, system capacities, calibration information, and performance data for each equipment provided to the owner. ❑ HVAC O&M documents for all mechanical equipment and system provided to the owner by the mechanical contractor. Written HVAC balancing and operations report provided to the owner. The above post construction requirements have been completed. Principal Mechanical Designer -Name Signature Date Project Title: 88 Tech Park Way Report date: 03/31/15 Data filename: C:\Users\wmanderson\Documents\COMcheck\88 TP Way.cck Page 3 of 3 Signal Warrant Analysis Kimball Ave & Community (East) 88 Tech Park Way South Burlington, Vermont Signalization Warrant Analysis Chapter 4C: Traffic Control Needs Studies of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), 2009 Edition, was consulted to determine whether the installation of a traffic control signal is justified in this location. Based on the existing traffic volumes and characteristics of the intersection, two of the eight traffic signal warrants were met, as described below: • Warrant 1, Eight -Hour Vehicular Volume: Not Met Standard: The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that one of the following conditions exist for each of any 8 hours of an average day: A. The vehicles per hour given in both of the 100 percent columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1 exist on the major -street and the higher - volume minor -street approaches, respectively, to the intersection; or B. The vehicles per hour given in both of the 100 percent columns of Condition B in Table 4C-1 exist on the major -street and the higher - volume minor -street approaches, respectively, to the intersection. MUTCD Table 4C-1 Hourly vehicles on Major Hourly vehicles on higher - street (total of both volume minor -street approaches) approach (one direction only) A 500 150 B 750 75 The following table is a summary of the major street volume and the minor street hourly volumes that are expected at the intersection of Kimball Avenue and Community Drive (East) once the project has been constructed. Volumes noted in Table 4C-1 are exceeded for seven hours of the day under Condition B and therefore this warrant is not met. Table 1: Eight -Hour Warrant Comparison Volumes Major Street Volume (Both Approaches) Minor Street Approach Volume (Community Condition A Condition B 7:00 AM 796 44 n n 8:00 AM 843 61 n n 9:00 AM 742 68 n n 10:00 AM 743 94 n n 1 1:00 AM 871 171 y y 12:00 PM 1007 218 y y 1:00 PM 917 104 n y 2:00 PM 873 128 n y 3:00 PM 979 208 y y 4:00 PM 1082 239 y y 5:00 PMI 942 273 y y 6:00 PMI 605 63 n n E Signal Warrant Analysis Kimball Ave & Community (East) 88 Tech Park Way South Burlington, Vermont • Warrant 2, Four -Hour Vehicular Volume: MET Standard: The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that, for each of any 4 hours of an average day, the plotted points representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher -volume minor -street approach (one direction only) all fall above the applicable curve in Figure 4C- I for the existing combination of approach lanes. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the some approach during each of these 4 hours. Figure 4C-1. Warrant 2, Four -Hour Vehicular Volume > so° r +, UJ ao° 0r wc W 4 U) a 300 rrw z 200 20 cc 100 W x try r '115 '80 300 400 500 600 700 8Co 900 1ON, 1DO 1200 1300 1400 MAJOR STREET —TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Nate: 115 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a mmcx-street approach with two or more lanes and 80 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with one lane. The dot on the graph represents the four highest hourly volumes, which all falls below the curve for single -lane approaches and therefore the warrant is not met. • Warrant 3, Peak Hour: MET Standard: This signal warrant shall be applied only in unusual cases, such as office complexes, manufacturing plants, industrial complexes, or high - occupancy vehicle facilities that attract or discharge large numbers of vehicles over a short time. The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that the criteria in either of the following two categories are met: A. If all three of the following conditions exist for the some 1 hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average day: TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 2 Signal Warrant Analysis Kimball Ave & Community (East) 88 Tech Park Way South Burlington, Vermont 1. The total stopped time delay experienced by the traffic on one minor -street approach (one direction only) controlled by a STOP sign equals or exceeds: 4 vehicle -hours for a one -lane approach; or 5 vehicle -hours for a two-lane approach, and 2. The volume on the same minor -street approach (one direction only) equals or exceeds 100 vehicles per hour for one moving lane of traffic or 150 vehicles per hour for two moving lanes, and 3. The total entering volume serviced during the hour equals or exceeds 650 vehicles per hour for intersections with three approaches or 800 vehicles per hour for intersections with four or more approaches. B. The plotted point representing the vehicles per hour on the major street (total of both approaches) and the corresponding vehicles per hour on the higher -volume minor -street approach (one direction only) for I hour (any four consecutive 15-minute periods) of an average day falls above the applicable curve in Figure 4C-3 for the existing combination of approach lanes. Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour = eco a 9 = SCE w 400 wa ¢a w 3C0 Cr Z Z) b 2C0 w 100 _ 400 500 600 7CO WO 900 1000 1100 12W 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 'BC0 MAJOR STREET —TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES — VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with one lane. The dot on the graph represents the peak hour volume on the major street of 968 vph and the minor street volume of 239 vph, which falls above the curve for single -lane approaches. In addition, the side -street delay does not exceed 4 vehicle -hours and therefore this warrant is not met. • Warrant 4, Pedestrian Volume: Not Met Standard: The need for a traffic control signal at an intersection or midblock TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) Signal Warrant Ana 88 Tech Park Way Kimball Ave & Community (East) South Burlington, Vermont crossing shall be considered if an engineering study finds that both of the following criteria are met: A. The pedestrian volume crossing the major street at an intersection or midblock location during an average day is 100 or more for each of any 4 hours or 190 or more during any 1 hour; and B. There are fewer than 60 gaps per hour in the traffic stream of adequate length to allow pedestrians to cross during the some period when the pedestrian volume criterion is satisfied. Where there is a divided street having a median of sufficient width for pedestrians to wait, the requirement applies separately to each direction of vehicular traffic. The observed pedestrian volume crossing the major street at this intersection is not greater than 100 or more for any hour of the day and therefore this warrant is not met. • Warrant 5, School Crossing: Not Met Standard: The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered when an engineering study of the frequency and adequacy of gaps in the vehicular traffic stream as related to the number and size of groups of school children at an established school crossing across the major street shows that the number of adequate gaps in the traffic stream during the period when the children are using the crossing is less than the number of minutes in the same period and there are a minimum of 20 students during the highest crossing hour. The intersection is not located at an established school crossing and therefore this warrant is not met. • Warrant 6, Coordinated Signal System: Not Met Support: Progressive movement in a coordinated signal system sometimes necessitates installing traffic control signals at intersections where they would not otherwise be needed in order to maintain proper platooning of vehicles. This intersection does fall within a coordinated signal system corridor and therefore this warrant is not met. • Warrant 7, Crash Experience: Not Met Standard: The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that all of the following criteria are met: A. Adequate trial of alternatives with satisfactory observance and enforcement has failed to reduce the crash frequency; and TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 4 Signal Warrant Analysis Kimball Ave & Community (East) 88 Tech Park Way South Burlington, Vermont B. Five or more reported crashes, of types susceptible to correction by a traffic control signal, have occurred within a 12-month period, each crash involving personal injury or property damage apparently exceeding the applicable requirements for a reportable crash; and C. For each of any 8 hours of an average day, the vehicles per hour (vph) given in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition A in Table 4C-1 (see Section 4C.02I, or the vph in both of the 80 percent columns of Condition B in Table 4C- I exists on the major -street and the higher -volume minor -street approach, respectively, to the intersection, or the volume of pedestrian traffic is not less than 80 percent of the requirements specified in the Pedestrian Volume warrant. These major -street and minor -street volumes shall be for the some 8 hours. On the minor street, the higher volume shall not be required to be on the some approach during each of the 8 hours. The intersection has not seen five or more crashes within a 12-month period and therefore this warrant is not met. The most recent General Yearly Summaries (2008- 2012) - Crash Listings provided by the Highway Research Department of VTrans was used to determine the number of crashes occurring within 0.2 miles (approximately 1000 ft) of the intersection of Kimball Ave and Community Drive. This intersection is not listed by VTrans as a High Crash Location. • Warrant 8, Roadway Network: Not Met Standard: The need for a traffic control signal shall be considered if an engineering study finds that the common intersection of two or more major routes meets one or both of the following criteria: A. The intersection has a total existing, or immediately projected, entering volume of at least 1,000 vehicles per hour during the peak hour of a typical weekday and has 5-year projected traffic volumes, based on an engineering study, that meet one or more of Warrants 1, 2, and 3 during an average weekday; or B. The intersection has a total existing or immediately projected entering volume of at least 1,000 vehicles per hour for each of any 5 hours of a non -normal business day (Saturday or Sunday). This intersection would not be considered the intersection of two or more major routes and therefore this warrant is not met. TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 5 Act 250 Application Form ver. 1.2 rev. 09/18/2014 a. Is the project tract physically contiguous to a downtown development district, village center, new town center, growth center, Vermont neighborhood, or neighborhood development area as designated under 24 V.S.A. , chapter 76A? M Ye l_ I No b. If the project is not contiguous to an existing settlement, provide an analysis comparing the public benefits and costs of the project. (Cost of services vs. taxes and other benefits such as needed housing and employment). a. Indicate whether an excessive or uneconomic demand will be placed on supportive governmental or public utility services, such as electric services, municipal water or sewer services, solid waste and recycling services, etc.). If the Project is commercial, industrial, or a multi -family building, show on a plan how solid waste and recycling services will be accommodated. Attach copies of utility letters. Natural gas, electric, telephone, cable, water and sewer services will be used. Land Use Permit #4C0190-5 found hey were available and adequate. 1 a. List any adjacent governmental or public utility facilities, services and lands, including highways, airports, waste disposal facilities, buildings, fire and police stations, universities, schools, hospitals, electric generation and transmission facilities, oil and gas pipelines, parks, hiking trails, forest and game lands, etc. Refer to #4C0190-5. b. How will the project affect any such adjacent property? (Refer to #4C0190-5. I Note: See Criterion 9(L) Procedure for additional information prior to answering the questions below. a. Is the project tract physically inside a downtown development district, village center, new town center, growth center, Vermont neighborhood, or neighborhood development area designated under 24 V.S.A., chapter 76A? j I Ye pQ No If not, is the project inside an existing settlement (an existing center that is compact in form and size; that contains a mixture of uses that include a substantial residential component and that are within walking distance of each other; that has significantly higher densities than densities that occur outside the center; and may be served by municipal infrastructure such as water, wastewater, sidewalks, paths, transit, parking areas, and public parks or greens)? �Ye j �No s Please explain. - The project is located within the Technology Park subdivision, served by municipal water, wastewater, sidewalks, paths, transit, parking areas and green space. b. If the project is outside a designated center or other existing settlement: i. Explain how the project will make efficient use of land, energy, roads, utilities, and other supporting infrastructure. IProject is inside an existing settlement. Act 250 Application Form Page 20 of 23 t i .vmmov Act 250 Application Form ver. 1.2 rev. 0911812014 ii. Demonstrate that the project will not contribute to a pattern of strip development along public highways. I Project is inside an existing settlement. I iii. If the project is confined to an area that already constitutes strip development (as defined in 10 V.S.A. §6001(36)), demonstrate that it incorporates infill (as defined in 24 V.S.A. §2791) and is designed to reasonably minimize the characteristics listed in the definition of strip development under subdivision 6001(36) of this title (see Guide for IN/A - Project is inside an existing settlement. I a. Does the municipality have a duly adopted plan? Ye j I No s b. How does the project conform to the uses and policies identified for that district? IT he building is a commercial office building. c. Are there town plan policies that apply to the project? What are they and how does the project conform? ILot 3 is within a a previously approved subdivision. I d. Have local approvals/permits been obtained? (Attach copies) I I Ye M No { ] None Required s e. What regional plan applies to the project? IChittenden County Ecos Plan I What date was it I6/9/2013 adopted? In what land use district, as designated in the regional plan future land use map, is the project located? IThe project is located in the Enterprise Planning District of South Burlington. How does the project conform to the uses and policies identified for that district? The project conforms with the Regional Plan in that the Enterprise Planning District is an area planned for future growth. This building is proposed infill for this district. Refer to findings under #4C0190-5. f. Are there other regional plan policies that apply to the project? What are they and how does the project conform? I No g. Explain how the project conforms to a duly adopted capital program, if the town has one. IRefer to findings under #4C0190-5. Act 250 Application Form Page 21 of 23 Vermont Agency of Natural Resources, Waste Management Division Construction Site Waste Reduction Plan Preliminary Company Name: Re -Arch Company Contact Person: Evan Lan_fc�eldt Address: 55 Community Drive, #402 Telephone #: 802-863-8727 x 202 Project Location: 88 Technology Park Way, South Burlington, VT Project Description: The project consists of a new building with 54,459 sq feet of office space to house approximately 200 employees to be located on Lot 3 of Tech Park. The building will be roughly a mirror image of the building on Lot 2. Access will be via the private Technology Park Way, off of Community Drive. Site improvements consist of a 194 space parking area, including 8 accessible spaces: landscaping and berms to screen parking areas; and energy -efficient LED pole -mounted and building -mounted lighting. Construction duration is expected to be approximately 14 months. Re -Arch Company will be the design -build firm. Job -site Planning Worksheet Waste Prevention Planning -Recycling dumpsters including cardboard, metal, and reusable materials will be on site for the duration of the project to reduce landfill waste. Education Plan - The applicant will make certain that the construction company actively educate their employees and subcontractors regarding waste reduction. Constant education both at pre -construction meetings and weekly job meetings are important reminders to implementing recycling awareness. Also, any material that is salvageable such as scrap lumber, etc. will be placed in a designated area to be utilized by employees. Recycled materials are tracked by trucking slips and payroll records (subcontractors) that differential landfill loads versus recycled materials (concrete, metal, cardboard, asphalt, and clean wood). Contract specifications - The recycling program we will be participating in will be No Sort for much of the construction and demolition debris, which can all be mixed into one container to be recycled at the end site. Removal of the containers to be hauled to the Construction and Debris (C&D) recycling facility will be coordinated by the site super/project manager with the waste removal company. All subcontractor agreements will include reference to this Waste Reduction Plan as follows: "The subcontractor will make a good faith effort to reduce the amount of waste generated on the job -site and recycle material as per the contractor's Waste Reduction Plan. The subcontractor will follow the designated handling procedures for each type of waste generated on -site and provide documentation to verify material reuse, recycling, and disposal as indicated in the waste Reduction Plan." Reuse & Recycling Worksheet Material Estimated End Markets - For a listing of Vermont salvage and recycling Handling/Site Management - how Quantity markets check out the web site at: materials are to be removed, separated, www,onr.state.vt.us/dec/wastediv/recycling/c&d.htm stored and hauled for reuse or recycling. or call 802-241-3477 or 241-3481. Doors N/A Not Applicable Fixtures N/A Not Applicable Moldings N/A Not Applicable Insulation ±.12 Ton Salvage when possible Flooring ±.25 Ton Salvage when possible Roofing ±6,500 sf Salvage when possible Asphalt One 20cy Reused Stripped and hauled to processing plant. container "Clean" Wood ±1 Ton Wood will be salvaged when possible or hauled to C&D recycling Material will be placed in mixed C&D center. container. Concrete ±25 Tons Crushed and reused. Demolish and haul to crusher Metal ±2 Tons Recycled metals. Metal will be placed in a separate container and hauled to a salvage yard to be recycled. Plaster/Drywall ±1 Ton Mixed C&D container will be hauled to C&D recycling center for Material will be placed in mixed C&D recycling. containers. "Treated/Painted" ±1 Ton Mixed C&D container will be hauled to a C&D Recycling Center to Material will be placed in mixed C&D Wood be source separated and recycled. containers. Glass N/A Not Applicable Household 1 cy Recycling center A container for mixed household Recyclables recyclables will be provided on the 0obsite and hauled for recycling. Cardboard One 10 cy Material will be hauled to a recycling center. Material will be placed in a specific container cardboard container and hauled to a recycling center to be recycled. A B G J K L M N O P Q R S. T IU V W X Y AA 1 3 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 5 Current Bond Obligations 5836 =17AD $796,50 S77408 S752,W 5728 704 3608,952 5590,007 5570 6 Revenue L=W Option Sales Tax .360000 -360000 -360000 -360000 -360000 -360000 -360000 -360000 -360000 7 Police Station Fee -125000 -125000 -125000 -125000 -125000 -125000 -125000 -WOOO -125000 8 9 10 Highway/Parks 11 Curtent Not s $O $O SO SO SO $O SO SO SO 12 Expenditum Paying $575 000 "W 000 $900 WO $9W 000 f900 000 $900 000 S9W OW 5900 000 $900 000 13 Fleet Replacennent f60OW $440000 $140OW $418000 $174,000 $290000 $377,000 $150,000 $250000 14 Salt/Sand Storage Shed on $1QW0 $100000 SO SO SO SO SO SO $O 15 Garage Expansion $0 $15 000 $125 000 SO SO SO 50 SO $O 16 Nev; Fueling System 50 SO $O $25 000 $250,000 SO SO SO SO 17 En Efficiency Ion rovementts SO SO SO SO SO $O SO $O S0 18 Revenue bade -in $O SO SO 50 SO SO S0 1 $O $O 19 Revenue FY13-14 Canyover SO SO I SO I i0 SO SO $O $O SO 20 Total Highway/Parks To Be Raised By Property Tax S645.0001 S1 SI 165 000 $1 43 $1 24 000 51,190,000 $77 00 $1050 0 $1150 OW 21 23 Fire Department 24 Current Note-Capind improvements SO SO $O so 50 $O SO $O 25 Current Note - Quint $149 069 $O SO SO SO SO SO $O 26 Revenue Fire hmact Fees For Station 2 rove1 $O SO 50 SO SO so SO $O 27 RepwymwtafWPC Note SO SI53 OW $153 000 $153 000 SD $O SO SO 28 Expenditures Vehicles $O SO $35 000 $O $394 000 $738 000 SO 5725 000 $I 00 29 5215 Fran reserve fund - 65 100 50 To t3P Reserve Pun&Fire Station 2Im SO S90 OW $321 000 $174 000 $17 000 -$12,000 5335 OW 5308 000 5227 000 30 Revenue trade m SO so 5o $O $O $O to So SO 31 Reserve Fund -Fire Equipment Reserve I SO SO $0 $O -5394 000 4364,000 SO 4287 000 -$594 000 32 Note fronn WPC SO SO $O SO I SO SO SO SO $O 33 Net $O $90 WO $356 O00 $174 000 1 $172 000 $386 000 $335 000 5746 0W $933 000 34 EnorgyEffmencybaprovements 50 SO SO $O 1 SO $O SD $O 35 Fire Station 2 Iniprovements 50 38 Equipument S57 5W SO $97 5W $60 000 $34 000 S0 $l 000 $O 37 Total Fire De nrtmmrtTe Be Raised By Property Tax 5206,569 $243 OW $606 0 5387,000 5206 5386 OW SMSW S7 0 $933,000 38 39 Ambrda_nc_e 40 Expenditures Vehices SO SO $O $O $2646W SO SO SO $O 41 To Reserve Fund SO $O $O SO SO SO SO $O SO 42 Revenue trade in SO SO $O SO SO $O SO SO SO 43 Curm" Ba4nee S105K Reserve Fund -Fund 307 SO SO SO $O SO SO SO SO SO 44 Net SO i0 $O SO 52640W SO SO SO $O 45 -EMS 531,000 to SO $3 000 $O SO $54 000 SO $O 46 Total Ambulance S31 000 Sol SO $3 000 5264,000 5o S54 W SO SO 47 48 Total Fin and Ambulance To Be Raised By Property Tax $237 9 5243 S"61500 1 5419,000 3470 000 5386 0W 5399 0W S74 OO $933 000 49 50 Police Department 51 EvendituresVehldes $49000 $114000 $117000 $158000 $117000 $159000 SISOOW 51200W S16 000 52 Revenue trade in SO 43,000 -S3 WO 44.000 -$3 OW 43,000 -S4 000 43,000 -$4 0 W 53 Net MAW $111000 $114 W0 51540W $114000 $156000 Sl OW $1170W $158000 54 1 B i Repairs to CIP SO $20 000 $20 000 $20 000 $20 000 $20 000 S20 0W $20 000 $20 000 55 Equipmad Twasamubvms 59 080 $37 0W $8 000 SB WO SS OW $9 000 $8 000 $ OW $B OW 56 Secipity and Building Access Ecmd unim SO SO SO $O $0 $145000 SO m SO 57 1Photocopier SO SSOW SD $O 58000 $O S0 S9000 SO 58 IDispatch EquipwAnt SO SO SO SO SO $50000 $50000 So $O 59 lCmwuter, Radio&Electronics $129000 $40000 S30000 S32.0DO S43000 $32.000 $87000 $37000 $38000 60 Total Police Department To Be By Property Tax 5187 O 5216 $172,000 3214.0001 $193000 S411,000 5313000 $191 $224 61 62 63 lRecrestion and Parka 64 itures Develop Active Recreational Areas SO 550000 S300,OW $600,000 $8000W SD SO $O 0 65 Si e & Wayfinding $4,000 $O $O SO SO SO SO SO 0 66 Dorset Park Playground Expansion SO SO SO $O SO 1 $O SO 0 67 EneW Efficiency Improvements SO Sol I 50 50 SO ±D SO 0 68 Facilities S32,OW 532,476 $32,500 $O SO so SO SO 0 69 Revemre Recreation act Fees SO -S500W SO SO SO SD I to SO 0 70 IFuture Debt to be Determined IEO $O 53W WU1 46WOW $800O00 SO I so SOI 7A A B G J K L M N of p O R S T U I v W X Y AA 1 3 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2019 FY 2019 IT 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 71 72 Total Recreation and Parks To Be Raised By Property Tax 536 S32 76 $32,500 so SO so s0 $0 0 73 74 Recreation Paths 75 ExpendiMm Kimball Avenue Recreation Paths s0 so $165,000 $759,000 $396 000 $0 SO s0 s0 76 Allen Rd. Ree. Path I SO 50 $0 $51 000 $185 000 SO s0 SO $0 77 Spew Street Jug Handle Rec. Path SO So so $26.000 $104,000 s0 SO $0 $0 78 S. Dorset Street Rec. Path so s0 so s0 $104,OW $104.0001 1 $830,000 SO so 79 Shelburne Road PedBike Facilities SO s0 s0 $0 $58.000 $289,000 5231000 $0 $0 80 lJoy Drive - Bike/Ped Facilities SO SO so SO $17,000 $76,000 $25.000 So $0 81 Revenue Grants -Future $0 so SO -$759,000 4685,000 -$335,000 41,061,000 SO $0 82 Recreation Fees SO s0 4165,000 -577,000 4179.DDOi 4134 000 -125 000 s0 so 83 84 Total Recreation Paths To Be RaisedBy Property Tax So Sol so so s0 I so so so I so 85 Road and SidewalkImprovements 86 EVenditures Hinesburg Rd. Sidewalk $18,000 s0 $54000 so $0 SO S0 $0 $0 87 Dorset Street-116 south Sol s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 s0 Be Williston Road Access Mana ement SO $75.000 SO $0 $0 $0 s0 s0 s0 89 Intersection hn vts Airpon Pakwa SO $50,000 $200,000 SO so $0 $o so s0 90 Allen Rd. Sidewalks s0 SO SO $33.000 $167,000 $14 000 So SO SO 91 Shelburne Rd Crosswalk Imp $5,000 SO $0 323,000 S93 000 $o s0 $0 S0 92 Van Sicklen-Route 116Intersection SO Sol so $0 54 000 so $0 I0 so 93 Spear Street Reconstruction SO $of s0 s0 s0 5325,000 5325 000 94 Williston Road hn mvements s0 So $0 $0 SO $100,000 5369,000 $4221,000 so 95 Connect Tilley to Community Drive So Sol so so so so SO 5250,000 $0 96 Williston Rd Long Term van s0 Sol so so 1 $0 SO s0 s0 $0 97 Park ovememts so s0 so $0 SO s0 s0 t0 so 981 Revenues Recreation hn [Fees -S18,000 SO -$15 000 -323 000 so -$100,000 s0 SO s0 99 Rec Im t Fees -Shelburne Rd Cros 45,000 496,000 so $0 496,000 -$225 000 -$445 000 494,000 SO 100 Bond - Future s0 so So So s0 $0 $0 42,596,000 $0 101 Grants - Fuhm & Other s0 -S29,O110 -5239,000 so -5557 000 -$24 000 -5249,000 -S4,377,000 - s0 102 Total Road & Sidewalk Im rovent To Be Raised ByProwqTnx $0 SO SO 533 000 S37 So so s0 So 103 104 Administration 105 Expendituresl Signage & Wayfinding s0 $30.000 s0 so s0 SO so IO So- 1061 lFacilities Assessment So $0 $o $0 So so so SO S0 107Total Administration ToBeRai sedB Pro er Tax SO S30 s0 s0 so so 50 $0 so 108 1 CityCenter 110 111 112 B Market Street $1,798,400 $3 412,267 $650.916 $o so SO SO so SO 113 Garden Street $327,298 $3,129,249 $1.610,522 So so So $0 so So 114 Central Green & Streets SO $0 S99 405 $331.351 53,M5 452 s0 $0 SO SO 115 City Cents Park $167 875 $776,937 $736,938 s0 $0 $0 s0 SO SO 116 Community Recreation Center $913,918 $6,67%699 $6.246,793 $3 123.391 $0 So $0 so so 117 Lib $318,118 $2465,418 $4.453,659 $2.239,359 so $0 SO SO SO 118 City Hall $259340 S1,327,5741 $1207,569 5603,784 SO $0 SO Sp $0 119 City Center - Parking Garage s0 $485,000 $1,114231 $9,660.769 so $0 s0 SO $0 120 Williston Road Str $73,162 $219,495 S219,4951 $3,204,474 SO s0 $0 $0 $0 121 Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge over 891 SO so $250,000 $500,000 $300000 s300000 $300000 $8900,000 $0 1221 Revenue Grants -$I 430 400 $2 718 82 -$250 000 -$300 000 4300 000 48 900 000 SO 1231 Ai wa finpact Fees -5685288 424119 473162 $0 s0 $0 s0 s0 so 124 Recreation Impact Fees so So SO so so so SO m1 $0 125 ICIP Reserve Fund 473162 SO s0 so s0 SO So ID SO 126 127 128 TIF District Debt C' Bands -Future -Sl 491 76 -f7 388 90 -U 723 442 45.643,504 SO so so I s0 s0 213724 IIF Financing Proceeds, incl Anticipatia -5167 875 -$e 351 938 -$7 792 801 414,019,623 43,595,452 s0 $0 So TIFDistrictFinamin AN Debt Pa $5675 s294853 5898491 $1664178 21 63 401870 348791 $ 58483 129 T1F Distrie IncremantBAN Fu ' -S5 775 4294 853 -5898 491 41 664178 21 40l 870 348,791 -S2 258 483 412 576 130 Net $O $o $0 so so $0 $0 SO $0 131 A 8 G i K LM N 0 F Q R S T U V W X Y AA 1 3 132 133 134 135 136 City Debt BmMAN Pa CIPReserveFund Recreation act Fee Future Public FAC4litY IMDact Fee FY 2016 $50 415 -550415 $0 SO FY 2017 $361 022 -$304129 SO -S56893 FY 2018 $993 272 -$781939 $0 -$211 33 FY 2019 $1 518 09 -$1200152 f0 -5318157 FY 2020 $I 650,225 -$1,307117 $0 -5349108 FY 2021 $1 610 768 -$1270107 SO -S340661 FY 2022 $1 579 612 -$1245W $0 -$334066 FY 2023 $I 549 82 -$1221628 f0 y727654 FY 2024 $1 487 317 -$1172770 SO -$314547 137 138 Total aly Center To Be Raised Pro rtyTax SO s0 s0 SO $0 SO $o 1 Sol SO 139 Water Tower Antenna $155 00 S0 SO SO SO SO SO $0 SO 140 141 Transfer to CIP Reserve Fund 1 $615 29 S63SA37 S656,364 $678,228 S700JM S724,222 S843974 $862919 S882 479 142 Total Capital Expenditures To Be Raised By Properly Tax I S2,278575 94,402 $2,993 926 1 $3,026 26 53 041926 S3 004.926 S3,004,926 A 26 S3 24 927 143 144 145 Sewer 146 Current No s S7517060 $1517060 51517060 $1517060 $1517060 $127 060 $I 72060 $1,272,060 $1272060 147 Revenue, ColchesterPortionofAi 4742,310 -$74 10 -$742.310 4742310 4742,310 4742,310 4742,310 -$74 310 $742,310 148 Expemiftres Vehicles 5250000 $0 $160000 $65000 $0 SO SO $0 $304000 149 EnergyEfficiency ImDrovesnents SO SO $0 SO $0F SO $0 $0 $0 150 Bartlett BayU $0 $0 $0 SO $200,000 S200 000 $5 000.000 $10 000 000 $0 151 Airport Parkway Outfall 550,000 $450,000 $0 SO SO s0 I SO $0 SO 152 Sewer Pump Station SCADAR I $0 $70,000 SO $0 $0 SO SO $0 $0 153 Hinesburg Rd. PS and Dorset St. FN $0 $0 $100 000 $150.000 $1,657,000 $1,657 000 SO SO $0 154 Hadley Rd Pump Station I S100000 $1,525,000 $0 $0 SD $0 $0 f0 $p 155 Lane Press PS & FM l S45 000 $25,0001 $1500,000 1 $0 SO SO $0 so S0 156 Airport Ci Increase $15,000 S150,000 SO So SO S0 SO $0 $0 157 BBWWTF P Limits $15,000 s0 m $0 SO $0 $D $o $0 158 Inflow & Infiltration Reduction $50,000 $150 000 $0 SO $0 SO Sfl SO $0 159 Gravi Sleeves $35,000 $65.000 $500,000 S500,W0 SO SO $0 $0 $0 160 WaslwaW Wrashuowm CIP $25 000 $0 SO so SO SO $0 $0 m 181 Revenue State Revohrin Fund -S385000 32,435,000 -$2,100000 -$650,000 -$1,657,000 41657,000 $o 52000,000 -$10,000,000 162 Total Sewer To Be Raised B Fees $974.750 $1 294,750 $1034 750 $989.750 S2 631,750 $2,386,750 29 750 $10,529 so S2 318 370 163 164 165 Stormwater 166 Current s SO $D $0 SO f0 f0 $0 SO 187 diturp Vehicles $200 000 $10 000 $160 000 SO SO $56 000 $3 500 f306 WO $254 000 168 To Sat reserve fled $200,000 $200 000 $200 000 $110,0W $110 000 S110 000 $110 000 $110 000 $254 000 169 Revenue from fleet Reserve Fund -33 000 -$58 500 -S160 000 $0 f0 -$56 000 -$3 500 -$366 000 -$254 000 170 Projects $593 000 $500 000 S659 000 $737 000 S833 000 $941000 $1 063 W0 $1 13 000 SO 171 C Center Environmental $50 000 $550 000 $2 900 000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO 172 Revenue Grants hand Other So 444.915 S44 815 -$44 815 -$44 815 -$44 815 -544 815 -S44 815 $0 173 TiFDistrict Financin $0 SO 900000 ±D $0 SO $0 m $0 174 Net $643000 $1.005,185 $614195 $692185 $788185 $896.1115i $1018185 $1168185 $0 175 Total Stormwater To Be Raised By Fees $671000 $1,156,695 5814 185 5802 185 5898,185 S1,006,1851 S1,128 185 - $1 18,195 S254 000 178 177 178 Ca ex Recap 179 including:currant borrowing Total General Fund ZZ 278 575 $2 994 402 993 926 S3,026,926 $3 041 926 S3 004 926 $3 004 926 $3 004 926 $3 324 927 1180 181 Total Sewer $974 750 $1294 750 $1034 750 $989 750 $2 631 750 386 750 $5 529 750 $10 529 750 $2 318 370 182 Total Stormwater 1 $671,0001 $1,156,685 $814 185 $802 185 5898 185 Sl 006185 Sl 12 Ill Sl 18185 $254 000 .1831Grand Total 1 1 $3.9M,325 SMp45,837 $4,842,8611 $4,818 861 $6 71 1 56 97 61 S9,"7,861 $14 752,861 $5 97 97 Abby A. Dery, P.E. From: Carr, Helen <Helen.Carr@state.vt.us> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2015 11:55 AM To: Abby A. Dery, P.E. Cc: Andrew Mills Subject: RE: 14-088 - Tech Park Lot 3 EFA Abby and Andrew, Thank you for your patience while I completed my review of the Engineering Feasibility Analysis for Lot 3 of Technology park. Based on the fact that you are able to meet CPv and Water Quality requirements and waive the recharge requirement, I found this EFA to be acceptable. The stormwater program will allow the construction to be completed according to the plans you have provided. Please keep in mind that you are operating under an expired permit in an impaired watershed and this permit will be required to be renewed at some point. I have already let the coordinator at Act 250 know this information. I am currently reviewing the moderate risk construction application for this project at Technology Park. I will contact you with any comments or questions when I complete my review. Best, Helen Helen Carr, Stornuvater District Manager Southern Chittenden County 802-4go-6170 / Helen. CarrC�state. vt.us From: Shane M. Mullen, P.E. [mailto:Shane.Mullen@tcevt.co Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 3:05 PM To: Carr, Helen Cc: Andrew Mills Subject: 14-088 - Tech Park Lot 3 EFA Helen, See attached materials. Andrew is cc'd here, please let him know if you have any questions/comments on this project. Regards, Shane M. Mullen, P.E. Project F rtaineer Civil hnaineerina 11 Adds- Land Surveyina TRUDELL Landscape Architecture E'nvironrwental Services 1 I I ,o�,.` L' RMONT State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Agency of Natural Resources Drinldng Water and Groundwater Protection Division WASTEWATER SYSTEM AND POTABLE WATER SUPPLY PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED 10 V.S.A. Chapter 64, Potable Water Supply and Wastewater System Permit Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Rules, Effective September 29, 2007 Chapter 21, Water Supply Rules, Effective December 1, 2010 Landowner(s): Technology Park Campus, LLC Permit Number: WW-4-4411 c/o John Illick PIN: EJ96-o138.04 55 Community Drive, Suite 402 South Burlington VT 05403 This permit affects property identified as Town Tax Parcel ID # South Burlington: 0436-00030.03 referenced in a deed recorded in Book 898 Page(S) 210 of the Land Records in South Burlington, Vermont. This project, consisting of the proposed construction of a 54, 459 square foot office building with two hundred employees on Lot #3 of Technology Park, and construction of water and wastewater services, served by municipal water supply services and municipal wastewater disposal services located on 88 Technology Park Way in South Burlington, Vermont, is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above subject to the following conditions. i. GENERAL 1.1 The project shall be completed as shown on the following plans and/or documents prepared by Abigail Dery, P.E. of Trudell Consulting Engineers, with the stamped plans listed as follows: Sheet Number Title Plan Date Plan Revision Date C2-01 Overall Site Plan 10/30/2014 3/23/2015 C2-02 Site Plan 10/30/2oi4 3/23/2015 C8-o1 Sewer & Water Details 10/30/2014 3/23/2015 Sheet 1 of 4 Subdivision Plat 10/03/2007 7/14/2014 Sheet 3 of 4 Easement Plat 10/03/2007 7/14/2014 1.2 This permit does not relieve the landowner from obtaining all other approvals and permits PRIOR to construction including, but not limited to, those that may be required from the Act 25o District Environmental Commission; the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division; the Watershed Management Division; the Division of Fire Safety; the Vermont Department of Health; the Family Services Division; other State departments; or local officials. 1.3 The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the landowner and all assigns and successors in interest. The landowner shall record and index this permit in the South Burlington Land Records within thirty, (3o) days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. 1.4 The landowner shall record and index all required installation certifications and other documents that are required to be filed under these Rules or under a specific permit condition in the South Burlington Land Records and ensure that copies of all certifications are sent to the Secretary. 1.5 No permit issued by the Secretary shall be valid for a substantially completed potable water supply and wastewater system until the Secretary receives a signed and dated certification from a Vermont Licensed Designer (or where allowed, the installer) that states: `7 hereby certify that, in the exercise of my reasonable professional judgment, the installation -related information submitted is true and correct and the potable water supply and wastewater system were installed in accordance with the permitted design and all the permit conditions, were inspected, were properly tested, and have successfully met those performance tests", a Regional Offices - Barre/EssexJct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit WW-4-4411 Page 2 of 3 or which otherwise satisfies the requirements of §1-308 and §1-911 of the referenced rules. 1.6 All conditions set forth in Permit Number WW-4-3040 shall remain in effect except as amended or modified herein. This project is approved for the construction of a 54, 459 square foot office building with two hundred employees on Lot #3 (3.98 acres) of Technology Park -and the construction of municipal water and sewer services. 1.7 Construction of additional nonexempt buildings, including commercial and residential buildings, is not allowed without prior review and approval by the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. No construction is allowed that will cause non-compliance with an existing permit. 1.8 Each purchaser of any portion of the project shall be shown a copy of the Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit and the stamped plan(s), if applicable, prior to conveyance of any portion of the project to that purchaser. 1.9 By acceptance of this permit, the landowner agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with the Vermont environmental and health statutes and regulations, and permit conditions. 1.10 Any person aggrieved by this permit may appeal to the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of issuance of this permit in accordance with to V.S.A. Chapter 22o and the Vermont Rules of Environmental Court Proceedings. 2.WATER SUPPLY 2.1 The components of the potable water supply herein approved shall be routinely and reliably inspected during construction by a Vermont Licensed Designer (or where allowed, the installer) who shall, upon completion and prior to occupancy of the associated building, report in writing to the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division that the installation was accomplished in accordance with the referenced plans and permit conditions, as specifically directed in Condition #1.5 herein. 2.2 This project is approved for connection to the water supply system owned by the City of South Burlington (VTo005092) for a maximum of 2700 gallons of water per day. 2.3 The landowner shall install and maintain backflow prevention devices that conform to Vermont Department of Public Safety standards and NFPA 13 for, any connection of a sprinkler fire suppression system to a public drinking water system. 2.4 This permit is based, in part, on a municipal approval for connection to their water distribution system. If the municipal approval expires, this permit shall be invalid unless the municipality renews its approval. If the municipality approval expires, a new permit must be issued for the project. An updated application form and an application fee will be required for the project. A new municipal approval letter shall be required. The rules in effect at the time of the filing of the application for a new permit will be applied to the project. n.WASTEWATER DISPOSAL 3.1 The components of the sanitary wastewater system herein approved shall be routinely and reliably inspected during construction by a Vermont Licensed Designer (or where allowed, the installer) who shall, upon completion and prior to occupancy of the associated building, report in writing to the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division that the installation was accomplished in accordance with the referenced plans and permit conditions, as specifically directed in Condition #1.5 herein. 3.2 This project is approved for connection to the City of South Burlington wastewater treatment facility as depicted on the plan(s) stamped by the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division. The project is approved for a maximum of 2400 gallons of wastewater per day. Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit W W-4-4411 Page 3 of 3 3.3 This permit is based, in part, on a municipal approval for connection to their wastewater treatment facility. If the municipal approval expires, this permit shall be invalid unless the municipality renews its approval. If the municipality approval expires, a new permit must be issued for the project. An updated application form and an application fee will be required for the project. A new municipal approval letter shall be required if the project is served by the municipal wastewater collection system. The rules in effect at the time of the filing of the application for a new permit will be applied to the project. David K. Mears, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By W 4-11� Dated March 26, 2015 Jess�lhne Wyman, Regional Engineer Essex Regional Office Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division cc South Burlington Planning Commission Abigail Dery/Trudell Consulting Engineers Act 25o District Environmental Commission-40190-1 Department of Public Safety, Division of Fire Safety KIMBALL AVENUE 336 77.48' S9 43' J CONTRACTOR TO VERI UTILITY _ _ �---. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS IORTO�w TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPU2 Y7 AND i F CATCH BASIN SUBMITTAL/FAR CATION' Ol E" '' �_----+- y. -_-_-- - RIM 33635 _ LOT 3 _ 33$ O OR O VERIFY UTILITY _ -_� , 141 �98 ACRES s- �:4OCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO SEEDETAIL SHEET CB 04 CATCH BASIN SURMITTAL/FABRICATION U Rlry ; FOR MODIfICA�IONS q¢_x r334.58 f- � _ -?= - T'J A'rR_ i_M - _ _ - -�"i- )NJ3Y(I✓ �3.t 94 Glbk( 8, 335 i2 I o _ -349 350 SNOW C.O- SIDE E __--TBRTT_4� -fi- PE SIR AN �;l -CROSSING SIGN MI+ DR URB-ME-MOUNTED M- R33945 F ��- R. • I 3 n ?35 40 PAVEMENT JOINT- KAI 33538 ` (SEE DETAIL) f ' I 4• -' _ - I �` 1 f STRIPED CROSSWALK #3.2 �, Is NDPf - _ .•, ca )4- n I R1113,' To z .Hn E - N 334 0 - rOLTIl6) 333.36 i l001i 2)-334. 19 p SMH2 I �pR C)t1T=339.06 � - I � b - t - s: wEnaND tIi E! LOT 2 a{ I Oo0 RIM'=334SYSTEM, 35 STORMWATER i=333.38 a e 7Nt3X3,=332.87 -` t .OUT=332..50; i v 33254 CHARGIFUTURE EVNG DM ue - STATIONS T w I - RI 33963 CB #5 I I N CAP ACCESSIBLE W(B 33-3a I \ RIM=3425t ( - SIGN( }. 1-1T 3rl \ IN ) 33.08 I I 7N 337.0' I { GONDUn-�-t. w � :fJUi•333.03 rl a T TOUT-336 4I � -- VEHLKIN PAR I ca #6 c i \ C.B.#i0 RIM=343.77 R1�1" 339.97 rINII21=338.64 J 1 1=342.50 s I I iQUT=333.5: I CB #3-4 _ _ CBS �j AN141 =339 78 _ I 3S'� iUUi=.338.28 Goa )l u. r SMH 3 I _ / _- i,.---�-----w_ Rim=343.4„sue_' _ `- I OU // / wp I- A CLAS552 WATER MAIN TOUT 339.8 f� i RAIN=339,b7 8 T CH - OLQGY PARK WAY D�tOP CURBI h I\ D r 13 117,22' --v - - SHARED USE PATH _ 352�1 354 a - -- - 1J � { C.O. i 10-11-1 I Ce { I I { ur LOT 4 _ I I - END OF CURB / I _._J- - --- FUTURE PHASE 2 CONCRETE GENERATOR PAD - -, ALT. FUEL VEHICLE -_ PARKING C.O. CB #3-6- iS"NDPE 1= 5AMH'i R i4826 Iih 740 71 1 rt1 II l2 HC1PE a---- °--- a I _i., - „ �...o r•` D =OSED PAD ---- - -. P r-ars,a uc ,, ..mr. r..r,:. ,i C O I PROP RACK w-: WITH ` RAIN 34338 m.. \I �� F.xLStMG-Rf7AlNING WALL I I S EXISTING STORMWATER- ALTERNATErADDITIONAL < I I I NAME RIM i1N TOUT TYPE ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION 3as DMH # I 347.43 340.50 340,53 N/A -i_ r .y I AIR RELEASE MANHOLE SEWER SERVICE CONNECT ROOF DRAIN I a -T o' \ \� 124 TECHNOLOGY PARKWAY =341.70 o TO EXISTING STUR POUT=342.72 ( ) R I PIM--.4 24 342_St . EXISTING 3 STORY BUILDING PROPOSED r WTAPPING VALVE I FIBER OPTIC CONNECTION 3$TORY ' _ - I DROP cuts OFFICE BUILDING 81 DI CL5VICE r UPPER SLAB FOOTING FFE-348.33 WATERSERVICE �', BOUT=34283 { E'XISiING RETANING -ALL DRAIN ELEV =3432 'REMOVE CAP J - I\- r 1 PROPOI SIDEWALK NECT TO EXISTING --= (TYPICAL) PVC EWER STUB R PROOPOSED DUMPSTER' AREA WITH I y U E76ss��.K '-- - NIGH BRICK WALL SCREENING LOT 3 PROPOSED STORMWATER NAME RIM I iIN I TOUT TYPE 15" HDPE IN 344a5 N/A 344.25 N/A CB #3-7 344.75 339.44 339.34 B CB #3-6 348.71 N/A 345.96 B CB #3-5 347.10 343.93 343.83 B CB #3-4 344.23 340.10 340.00 B CB #3-3 349.81 N/A 339.76 B CB #3-2 346.13 336.96 336.86 B CB #3-1 345.00 336.03 335.93 B 18" HDPE OUT 334.58 334.58 N/A N/A YD#2 346.75 N/A 343.75 YARD DRAIN YD # 1 347.70 1 343.00 1 342.90 IYARD DRAIN raQ,,G 3w _ 1-341.00. y 3� I NOTES: 1 POWER AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS, OUTDOOR PATIO PEDESTALS AND CONDUITS TO BE FINALIZED BY ELECTRIC CONTRACTOR. 2. FOOTING DRAINS PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. - I COORDINATE WITH MEP DRAWINGS- - 310 W' I I' 3. LIGHT POLE LOCATION FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES \ ONLY. SEE LIGHTING PLAN FOR FINAL HEIGHT AND LOCATION. DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO I THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER. � { 4. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PIPE SIZES PRIOR TO ORDERING DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. 1 " Graphic Scale Feet 30 0 30 60 PO 120 te` 6 ,%j® TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS 478 BLA•t PARK ROAD I WIR315TDN, YERNOXIT 06495 man BSI N'FI•.T1.EVDNk11 Revions No pescrpMn Dale By IQ WATER/SEWERNOTES 02/19113 AAD Q tsw FORBID 03105113 AID Q3 TTF&OCK 03/23/15 AID U 1 Oawmg I. a ne notes mesa a Ire r need+« «ebn' «Y PI nn9 co«dnalio Ih th tlu ipXnes or f.. d/ approve hom the eg 1 try Inontks. m y - landed asconstm r dr 'nqs vole noted tM1 or marked pp etl b egubtosy aulhorlt 2. By use of th tl - g f nsnudron o1 the Pml the Ownarrepr hYh hove revrewetl op« d, and accepted the d g obtaln•d o11 necessory p•nnlrs no no 1-1 1 opt table bcluding but not X fetl m• Engm•er ontl fha Arch fact to insure mesa pbsW «e propeM cowdmoted xbtlmg but -11m d W contract documents,Specific«rons nor/conhpctor pgraenlents, di ld', ontl mecnanlcal Pwns pmofe ontl publ C urXlnes and Omer palment pemnts fwaammKtpn 3 Owner ontl Afchnecf ore respons ae r« anal des gn and bet not buMd ngs snows 'nclud;ng on wee meosured a m I've (5) feat wound ony bWding and coved nanng 1 1 NY N actions shown on It,ese pI.- 5 1bDrawirp -ift to Prop tl re-1 -I. EI. By m fserc ce, mesa «owmgs ana open m of. Iu d by TCE m is excbere property. Cn ga Ise tlravmgs y y b• made by ICE Il d etl may sh be brough+to Ih 11 nonsof TCE' 6, I h• U» p bl ty to Copy confabs the most current revs o s. R uns«e please contocf TCE. WD u u p\x iqi �iy�Uat E��yk�` NN Prcrye« Blle 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington, Vermont et T a� Site Plan D te: W/30/11 5 ale: 1-=30' Propc+nlvmb«� xlaoee a By NPC Prop rEngineer: --_ Approved By: 1e1d Beak- C2-02 KIMBALL AVENUE -------------------- -------------- r-) 4r. SHARED USE PATH \. - � \ �� pa •. [.—�/ ____—_—__ •%' �i STORM WATER SYSTEMM _ _ T r �\ • o V _ PHASE 3 ° • ° lOAC I� IF vi - b ��—��d--I--I—�� r.\• �, TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC --- -_` -- •�� LOT 3 =% 398 ACRES _9•� --" � ` I � OFF -SITE RUNOFF LOT 2 PHASE 2 DIVERSION STORMWATER SYSTEM \ Oea 1.88 AC LOT 4 � � \ I � I �• I I \ IR I I TEMPORARY I r H%6E CONNECTED TO EXISTING STUB 1 • OW fy1 � 145----i.._— C. R j TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY °--- —°----- __-- -----_ _ L :ti•�_ 26 PAVED /_ I I ----- ---- _-- - NOU7 (TYP.J• I\ EXISTING RETAINING WALL \—\ 124 TECHNOLOGY PARKWAY I I I 1 EXISTING 3 STORY BUILDING I I I i I EPSC Legend • \ I j PHASE I \I 1.5AC I I — _ �KC/KIAREA I\ EXISTING RETAINING WALL • - I f - r— A. UMR I i \ - \ JILT FENCE • � � �,... � f I I O aVlif PRO1FCaON \ \ I I • —.1' I • ® STABIt31E0 CONJIRUCTgN \c\ \ _ __ — _—\ \ �` • � ' I j . i i ' = ENIRANCF �.__�____—� i • CNECK DA.. 1 L-------------- i I�i`s F I 310.00• i ^ - SILT FENCE I -� \ I i GropNC SCOID \ \ ��.• I FNl •=i , - , 30 0 30 60 90 120 rL► Add - TRUDELI CONSULTING ENGINEERS .r.x wwLLw.ON. —".P..T-1 Rewions hu�The,eaP�n� neiwee rrotea. mere o-ay..gs ae,n la aecrMr;av Pla.,�ro. oda.wtwn w;m omm dwl>»�s a ulilies, aW/a aPaow; hom Me ragvblory a�mairiei rhav Ple rat inte.wed a: comm,ctbn as«rqs ur�l«, norea as wcM1 1. only aawvgs specie oN maketl •For Camhuction- ae uses in. coryunctbn,nM connocl docnumes.i specifications. owrnw/cona apse 1- °nal�obeh,Ncoaanosea-«gym ornery igros. incNEiq tirteletl to ma ArPMtect A Pa able Iheu TCE 1, y not ba usetl fa con hp 1e l to o Canlact iCF to any consnucrwn survernp r ro obtain abchonw dales f bbf nztN b I y t. J 1Mse paa'ngs pe U o IM P leC PM are nol 1 lerobb Asimm, um m dro+�nRl. ontl tweol. huh Metl lry Tah operry Chpoo1only me by lCE Ir 41hesNal be bwu9M ro me tM ton or iCE' meaotery. .. ,use of I—a Rs fa commuteon of - Piolect. her her repre h-1 meY ho•aroviewetl apaovad. ono accepletl Me bowigi osW trove-1. d oppl�orHe p :�rxPar�e. ro m:„re _e dam ae w+Rlamer mpecls allM Rgecl. tM ^awr�er and NCMrecl. respmvde la anY b'.•dbP+ c�uang an aea memdao o mnimum me ISl.esl awns ony buiarg. J. III ., Usm s responsibiN ro enwre this cop, Contain 1M 1` E�-` Ink",, 'YTuIN 1 u� o For Per nT ing Only 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington. Vermont Jrral `ro Pre -Construction Plan Bcae. I"•3V Propcl Number. fila0B0 pp,rt� By PrOIeC• Fsgreer' MO Approved ey Neb Boot C5_01 —p----- - ---p— - EPSC Legend ee 57.40• _ 77.48' _ - .. - _o',_ _ i / /. a --CIA— I., __ _. __-_ .�. I., � PHASE UMR _ r SOIL STOCKPILES ANN • / /. �_ i O SQY STOCK PILE TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS LLC _ j K NA STONE CHECK DAM �1 Q AN, j '�% OT 3 23 AC RFS Y 1' r j = O n+LEi PRO7ECnON ✓ � -l. \ __ PHASE 3 = ® nABwao coNmeucnoN ENTRANCE �- _.�-o—_----- '• \ • ; 100" ;F __ 0 AC '. \• / / � �� iEMPORARYVEGETAIED DIVERSION $WALE AIR— 'TRT 145 �� I • ANN • = r_ • \ V' LOTS \ D1 - ORUNOFF LOT 2 � � PHASE 2 DIVERSION Air 1.88 AC ANN,' LOT 4 -_ ANN • t1 I I - PHASE LIMIT 1 F I • • l IAN, DEMARCATE EXTENT Of LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE I I - I •- WITH BARRIER TAPE (tYP.) � I AN 3 i • i a mTEMPORARYIT'HDPE I 0 I • I AN CONNECTED 70 EXISTING STUB "�o • ANN ANN ANN r• F r • I 1 � nr rar Ter O rei nr • � • F I I 1 r _ F I I TECHNOLOGY PARK WA -- TREE TO BE TRANSPLANTED (TYP.) i • I I ti 1 —,-- -- = 1 • —. —TEST— - TBT A ni rsr - P3,- 1 IANN • TEMPORARY PPE NOTES ' I I I • MIS FEATURE B INTENDED TO KEEP CONSTRUCTION RUNOFF FROM ENTERING THE S7ORMWATER FEATURES WHICH HAS NE POTENTIAL TO CAUSE ONGOING CONSTRUCTION -PHASE REPAIRS TO jSTRUCTURES AND 'NNW FUTURE PERFORMANCE. NE FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION MEASURES SHALL BE ADHERED IO I j I. INSTALL A IS DEGREE WYE AND TEMPORARY PIPE SHOWN, DISCHARGING TO CATCH BASIN. PROPOSED £ _ 3 STORY L y THEM 101AITY PIPE IS TO BE SiA&112ED WITH TYPE N RIP RAP AT TIE OUIFALL. I _ PHASE 1 OFFICE BUILDING I I WHEN ME STORMWAMN FEATURES HAVE BEEN STABILIZED AND THE REMAINDER OF THE SITE • J EARTHWORK IS COMPLETED THE TEMPORARY PPE AND SWALE ARE TO BE REMOVED AND / I 1.5 AC FEE=348.33 .__ I GROUND ESTORED TO TEMPOARI SWALE SHALLLRADE BE CAPPED TO PREVENT SEED THEE FINAIEOES GONURnOunFOiIG Ca RUNOFt I • a. ALL DRAINAGE FEATURES. INCLUDING CATCH BASINS. SHALL BE INSPECTED AND ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT REMOVED VIA VAC TRUCK ONCE CONSTRUCTION OF SITE FEATURES ARE COMPLETED • � i 1- I • GENERAL SMALLEST PRACTICAL AREA OF LAND SHALL BE EXPOSED AT ANY ONE TIME • ---�- j EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE RRSTAl1ED PRIOR TO ANY MOVING OPERATIONS. I ( I I = 3- CONTRACTOR AND/OR OWNER TOR APPOINTED DESIGNATEI SHALL INSPECT ALL EROSION CONTROL FEATURES AT LEAST ONCE PER WEEK AND AFTER ANY STORM EVENT GENERATING D2 I I • RUNOFF FROM THE SITE. • a. AFTER VEGETATION HAS BEEN FULLY ESTABLEHED. THE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL It = MEASURES SHALL BE REMOVED L_ O I I• 5 PROVIDEEROSION CONTROL MATTING ON ALL DISTURBED SLOPES WIN A RICH OF—V OR GREATER III d EXCAVATION AND PIPE INSTALLATION SHALL BE AVOIDED DURING PERIODS Of SIGN ECANI \ SILT FENCE I I PIT IPRATIDN ANNj = j `E 7 ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES AND VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WIN THE VERMONT STANDARDS B SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION PREVENRON B SEDIMENT CONTROL IBXMI. j• I EROSION CONTROL NOTES •i I Y LOT 6 Graphic Scale Feel R 2012 (iYPIC?L+' ; BO 0 30 60 90- 120 I �� td@ - *1' TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS aw PIAR R 'D 'LLITCEY T. °says RevlHons No D.—PE- Dote By Use of These Pawlrys Unbu ed Ire Drawilps nlentled la TxeKmlr'av panrR fl, oaanasan m me dNawR+esa IpENes tl/ a 1� regUb arY henlbt TMI fed dr fl Ixs noted ch 2 0rdy dII-Qs p T IN molkatl F C h w IN, ,.—d to be —.r, Ih documenlx. spec? Born / 1 � nh arsd to be ally coax ed 'I mm d pose v Judsg wr nor Imnetl to. Arc r. N appNCapb. mere Dawoenv,conshu c no Der sedgy conshuClbn byoW Coniotr ICE la eying - brmn elechoroC Obrpi t la romTrp Ilpn youf 3 These Dlpvengs ae I-&,c to the Project era dre —1 I—farabla A,'nihVmenrs of sery hese d—m 'and copes lhenpf lumshed by ICE Or ' claws property. Changes Ip the drpvArgs may Dory b ade by ICE. If ae Gscovered hey MIN be brought TI e,e aMnBpn pf ICE RnmedKe,A, 1 By use or These cYow✓'9s f d -hb-I.lbn of the PpeCl. 1M Owner eaese Vbvred paavetl. d owed lh aN yi Iw t pIN , ble pane /d dN.pp m ae aPI d d lb m p 1 Pr The vme. Od PRChiNI f po I y buntingsg, m dog an aea meowredamin mum MelSl feel d I,ewaag. SSUser—p'e.NAytae—'.Copyconlans- `��Wa°tF4Ve��p �APF44Ai 11 For Permii�i1ng Only 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington, Vermont Demolition and EPSC Plan c re. Ial3ona atew Number 211BL'BB Pawn BY NEC P,oject Engineer: API, paoved BY ... ' �C 3ook C5-02 IFF-SITE RUNOFF VERSION Graphic Scale 1 _ 30 0 30 60 90 12D EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NARR GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT THE FOLLOWING NARRATIVE WAS PREPARED FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL (EPSCI PLAN. THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF CONSTRUCTING A NEW BUILDING WITH NEW PARKING AND UTILITIES. EARTHWORK FOR THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF ANEW BUILDING, NEW PARKING AREA, AND TRENCHING FOR UTILITIES. SITE DRAINAGE CHARACTERISTICS THE SITE IS SET ON A RELATIVELY FLAT, OPEN AREA THAT GENERALLY DRAINS TO THE SOUTH WEST T. WITH PITCH NOT EXCEEDING GENERALLY 2%-5%ANYWHERE IN THE PROJECT AREA. DRAINAGE, WATERWAYS AND BODIES OF WATER POTASH BROOK IS THE ULTIMATE RECEIVING WATER FOR THE PROJECT. RUNOFF FROM THE SITE CURRENTLY FLOWS THROUGH A CATCH BASIN SYSTEM THAT LEADS TO WETLAND 2, LOCATED ADJACENT TO KIMBALL AVE TREATED RUNOFF THEN DISCHARGES INTO A NATURAL WETLAND LOCATION EXISTING FEATURES. BUILDINGS & UTILITIES THE PROPERTY I$ LOCATED ON TECHNOLOGY PARKWAY. KIMBALL AVENUE FORMS THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY AND THERE IS AN EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING ON THE LOT TO THE WEST. MUNICIPAL WATER AND SEWER SERVICE RUNS THROUGH THE PROPERTY BENEATH TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY. VEGETATION THE SITE IS CURRENTLY MEADOW. WITH SOME FORMAL PLANTING AND STREET TREES. SOILS SOILS IN THE PRIMARY AREA OF EARTHWORK CONSIST OF VERGENNES CLAY. PROXIMITY TO NATURAL AND MANMADE WATER FEATURES THE PROJECT IS APPROXIMATELY 1000 FT FROM POTASH BROOK, 175 FEET FROM THE NATURAL WETLAND, AND 50 FEET FROM THE CONSTRUCTED WEILAND. GRADING PLAN. TIMETABLE & CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE THIS PROJECT IS ANTICIPATED TO BEGIN IN LATE SPRING OF 2015. WITH THE BULK EARTHWORK ACTIVITIES BEING COMPLETED BY WINTER OF 2015. ALL CONSTRUCTION WILL BE COMPLETE BY WINTER 2016. FIRST, THE DISTURBANCE LIMPS ARE TO BE MARKED WITH BARRIER TAPE AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS. PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL FEATURES IE.G. SILT FENCE) WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE WORK BOUNDARIES NEXT TO ESTABLISH PROTECTION TO THESE NATURAL FEATURES. ONCE THESE ITEMS ARE INSTALLED, EARTHWORK MAY PROCEED ACCORDING TO THE EPSC PLAN, THE SITE SHALL REMAIN COMPLIANT WITH THE SITE STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS NOTED ON THE EPSC PLAN SET. BY PROVIDING PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES. THE RECEIVING WATERS ARE PROTECTED FROM EROSION FROM THE SITE. ALL MEASURES WILL BE REMOVED ONCE THE SITE HAS ACHIEVED FINAL STABILIZATION (GRAVEL AND VEGETATIVE COVER). REPORTING FREQUENCY SITE OBSERVATION WILL OCCUR A MINIMUM OF ONCE EVERY SEVEN 171 CALENDAR DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF A PRECIPITATION EVENT THAT RESULTS IN A DISCHARGE FROM THE SITE. ONSPE PLAN COORDINATOR IOSPCI INFORMATION TO BE DETERMINED STABILIZATION REQUIREMENTS ALL AREAS OF DISTURBANCE MUST HAVE TEMPORARY OR FINAL STABILIZATION WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) CALENDAR DAYS OF THE INITIAL DISTURBANCE. AFTER THIS TIME, ANY DISTURBANCE IN THE AREA MUST BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY: HOWEVER, THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS APPLY: I. IF WORK IS TO CONTINUE IN THE AREA WITHIN THE NEXT 24 HOURS AND THERE IS NO PRECIPITATION FORECASTED IN THAT TIME PERIOD, WORK MAY CONTINUE WITHOUT STABILIZATION, AND, 2. IF THE WORK IS OCCURRING IN A SELF-CONTAINED EXCAVATION WITH A DEPTH OF TWO (2) FEET OR GREATER (E.G. FOUNDATION EXCAVATION, UTILITY TRENCH), STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED. STABILIZATION IS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ME DETAILS PROVIDED IN THE EPSC PLAN SET. REQUIREMENTS FOR WINTER CONSTRUCTION THE FOLLOWING MEASURES MUST BE ADHERED FOR CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN OCTOBER 15 AND APRIL 15 TO ENSURE COVER OF DISTURBED SOIL IN ADVANCE OF A MELT EVENT. AREAS OF DISTURBED SOB MUST BE STABILIZED AT THE END OF EACH WORK DAY, WITH THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS: 1 IF NO PRECIPITATION WITHIN 24 HOURS IS FORECAST AND WORK WILL RESUME IN THE SAME DISTURBED AREA WITHIN 24 HOURS. DAILY STABILIZATION IS NOT NECESSARY. 2. DISTURBED AREAS THAT COLLECT AND RETAIN RUNOFF, SUCH AS HOUSE FOUNDATIONS OR OPEN UTILITY TRENCHES. PRIOR TO STABILIZATION. SNOW OR ICE MUST BE REMOVED TO A THICKNESS OF NO MORE THAN I INCH. MULCH USED FOR TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MUST BE APPLIED AT DOUBLE THE STANDARD RATE. OR A MINIMUM OF 3INCHES WITH AN 80-90%COVER. SILT FENCE AND OTHER PRACTICES REQUIRING EARTH DISTURBANCE MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO GROUND FREEZE. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES MUST BE KEPT OPEN AND FREE OF SNOW AND ICE DAMS. A MINIMUM 25 FOOT BUFFER SHALL BE MAINTAINED FROM PERIMETER CONTROLS SUCH AS SILT FENCES. IN AREAS OF DISTURBANCE THAT DRAIN TO A WATER BODY WITHIN 100 FEET. SILT FENCE SHALL BE REINFORCED. ALL AREAS THAT ARE DISTURBED DURING WINTER CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE STABILIZED BY APPLYING SEED AND MULCH AT TWICE THE NORMAL RATE AND THEN COVERED WITH STRAW MATTING. �� -tce pool TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS .re etuRPePa aaeO I WILL6TaN,rFaNONT o aaaese assrI Wv TCFVT.coN Re-veions No. Desc>Qaon Data By Use of These DlOwings I. Unless otherwise pored, fie a DrOVMgs ore intended for preA"Po_Q, COordinollon volhether disc,Ftn or utifitm.and/w oppmval from the Ieguatd aulhq ies. they ore not Intended e c Procfan drawl,,,, uN pored as.aah. 2. Only dravnngs specifically marked "FIX COnslrvction" ore mreraetl to be usetl in conjunction wim confmcl documents,spec coo�fa[.laowrser/conhactw aPeemanh and to be tty nOlete d vnlh omx dhcipbnes, including Wissol lunited to.Rro ArcNt«I. it applicable mere Dlav4ngs shW iql Oe used la cansaucranloyoal Conlotf ICE b vIW consmKlan surveying services a a oblov� ebcfrortic tl010 suilabre la comhacP n kryout 3. These IXowings ore 1p ft t0 the Ph je aid am not omterable. As—,,h.dnts of service, mesa drawings, and ,ehFIe t1rLfamishedby TCEareihexclusive TCEp If Changes to the tlr,,edi mayonly De rtasle by TCE.If are tl diltsad, they shall be troughf a fne altentoio o/TCElmmadiatery 4. By use os these drawings for C ens lion of the Project, the Owner rePleseMs fhol they hove reviewetl. approved, and accepted the drawings and have met with aH applicoble padies/dixap to inswe These plans are w.o. coordnosetl wangmm asp«h of Ifre hojecL The Owner and Arch«f. are respomibb 1« arW Wiairgs :r�wrl mews« an Qea measvlea a minlmam Rue Isl feet 5. Itsl c� Ums responsibBly to ensue aus Cop, crosaim the ///````�tlB o1IN1IFF4j� i For Permit'}t44ing Only �f TIae 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington, Vermont Stabilization Plan Dc e Prof«t Number. 201a0B8 _.__ Drown BY: AAp Project Engineer. MD Appoved BY C5-03 G STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES OFFICE OF PLANNING AND LEGAL AFFAIRS RE: TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMP EVAN ) DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL LANGFELDT ) COMMISSION #4 APPLICATION #4C0190-10 March 31, 2015 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE Please enter the appearance of the Agency of Natural Resources ("Agency"), State of Vermont, by and through its staff, Karin McNeill, in the above -captioned matter. COMMENTS Criterion 1B Waste Disposal: Stormwater Management The -Technology Park Campus, LLC has submitted this Act 250 application to complete the development of Lot 3. The Applicant has been in communication with the Agency's Stormwater District Manager Helen Carr for several months regarding the Technology Park's existing Stormwater Operational Permit #1-1458' for the stormwater design for development on Lot 2 and Lot 3 in the Technology Park. Ms. Carr required that the Applicant submit a Stormwater Engineering Feasibility Analysis (EFA) to show that this project meets current stormwater standards. This EFA was included in the Act 250 application. In an email sent on March 30, 2015. Ms. Carr has notified the Applicant that she approved the EFA and is allowing the Applicant to complete this project under the existing Permit #1-1458. In addition, the Applicant recently submitted a Moderate Risk Construction General Permit application #7355-9020. Ms. Carr is currently reviewing this application. Ms. Carr may be contacted at helen.carra,,state.vt.us or (802) 490-6170. Criterion 1B Waste Disposal The Applicant submitted a Preliminary Construction Site Waste Management Plan with their Act 250 application. This Plan has been reviewed by the Agency's Solid Waste Management Program. The Program has notified the applicant to that the Plan needs revision as to the management and disposition of the individual waste types. Upon the Program's acceptance of the revised Plan, the Applicant should send the revised Plan to the District Commission along with the Program's statement of approval. The applicant is encouraged to contact James "Buzz" Surwilo at james.surwilo@state.vt.us or (802) 522-5056. ' Permit #2-1107 which was referenced in Schedule B is the incorrect permit number. Criterion 1B Waste Disposal: Wastewater and Potable Water Supply The Applicant's Wastewater System and Potable Water Supply Permit WW-4-4411has been approved for this project on Lot 3. The Agency's Regional Engineer Jessanne Wyman may be contacted at jessanne.wyman gstate.vt.us or (802) 505-3930. Respectfully submitted, State of Vermont Agency of Natural Resources By: grin McNeill Regulatory Policy Analyst ANR Office of Planning and Legal Affairs (802) 505-0396 E-Notification CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILE #4C0190-10 I hereby certify that I, Karin McNeill, Regulatory Policy Analyst for the Agency of Natural Resources Office of Planning and Legal Affairs, sent a copy of the foregoing Agency Comments and Entry of Appearance dated March 3112015 regarding File #4C0190-10 by U.S. mail, postage prepaid, to the individuals without email addresses and by electronic mail to those with email addresses as indicated: Technology Park Campus, LLC 55 Community Drive, Suite 402 South Burlington, VT 05403 evanlgrearchcompany. com Abby Dery Trudell Consulting Engineers 478 Blair Park Road Williston, VT 05495 abby.dery@tcevt.com Donna Kinville, City Clerk Chair, City Council/Chair, City Planning Commission City of South Burlington 575 Dorset St. South Burlington, VT 05403 Y.Ifin McNeill, Regulatory Policy Analyst ANR Office of Planning and Legal Affairs Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 110 West Canal Street, Suite 202 Winooski, VT 05404 rmahonygccrpcvt.org Elizabeth Lord, Land Use Attorney Agency of Natural Resources 1 National Life Drive, Davis 2 Montpelier, VT 05602-3901 anr.act250gstate.vt.us f� southbu 1, PLANNING & ZONING March 20, 2015 Re: #SP-14-60 — 88 Technology Park Way Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) mnnthc If you have any questions, please contact me. Xvmoay el , r ndd J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7010 0290 0000 2215 6614 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com r southburlington PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP- 14 - � O (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW ❑ Administrative a Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): Technology Park Campus, LLC 55 Community Drive, Suite 40Z South Burlington, VT 05403 802-860-1691 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): v. 898, p. 210 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): same as Owner 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) attn: Abby Dery 478 Blair Park Road, Williston, VT 05495 (802) 879-6331 x 107 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: abby.dery@tcevtcom 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 88 Technology Park Way 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 0436-00030.003 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): 54,459 square foot office building with parking area b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): vacant c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Proposed uses include one building with 54,459 sq. ft. of office space d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): 54,459 sq. ft. e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): 50 ft, 3 floors f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): not applicable g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 200 employees h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Transit Overlay District Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE a. Building: Total Parcel Size: 173369 Existing 0 % / Proposed 10.47 % / Sq. Ft. 0 sq. ft. 18152 sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 8.94 % / 15,500 Proposed 57.44 % / 99,583 c. Front yard (along each street) Existing Proposed sq. ft. sq. ft. 17.26 % / 29,923 sq. ft. 17.26 % / 29,923 sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 100,000 * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 5,239,132 b. Landscaping: $ 59,891 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): included in building cost 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P. M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 140 trips 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: Monday through Friday 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Spring 2016 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of sub 'tting the site plan ap lic tion in accord nce with the city's fee schedule. I � ,IVY � , f � �/ �7 & �'Vema-\� Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. ol 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the informatio equested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowled LZ SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT IGNAUK OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: L`_r DevP elo ment Review Board ElAdministrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Compl The applicant orpermittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 ,0�. V IJRMO V 1 State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division Essex Regional Office ill West Street Essex Junction, VT 05452-4695 www.septic.vt.gov February 25, 2015 Technology Park Campus, LLC c/o John Illick 55 Community Drive, Suite 402 South Burlington VT 05403 Agency of Natural Resources [Phone] 802-879-5656 [fax] 802-879-3871 RE: WW-4-4411, Technology Park; proposed 54, 459 square foot office building with two hundred employees on Lot #3 of Technology Park located at 88 Technology Park Way in South Burlington, Vermont. Dear Applicant: We received your completed application for the above -referenced project on February 23, 2015, including a fee Of $2,000.00 paid by check #2586. Under the performance standards for this program, we will have a maximum of 45 days of "in-house" time to review your application. If we require further information from you to make a decision, the time until we receive it is not included in the in-house performance standards. If you have any questions about the review process, or if you have not received a decision on your application within the 45 in-house days, please contact this office. We have forwarded the information contained in your application to the Information Specialist for this region. A Project Review Sheet will be sent to you indicating other state agencies and departments you should contact regarding additional permits or approvals you may need under their programs. If you have not already done so, you should also check with town officials about any necessary town permits. If you submitted your application electronically through eDEC, your consultant will need to upload any revisions and send an email to Ernestine Chevrier and the reviewer notifying us that you have resubmitted information. This email should reference both the eDEC number and the WW number for the project. For the Drinking Water and Groundwater Protection Division Ernestine Chevrier Regional Office Coordinator cc: South Burlington Planning Commission Abigail Dery/Trudell Consulting Engineers Regional Offices — Barre/EssexJct./Rutland/Springfield/St. Johnsbury ray From: Abby A. Dery, P.E. <Abby. Dery@tcevt.com > Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 9:40 AM To: ray Cc: EvanL@rearchcompany.com; Jeremy Matosky, P.E. Subject: 88 Technology Park Way Hi Ray - The applicant would like to request that their previously continued appearance before the DRB (1 /20) be continued again to the first hearing in February (2/3). Regards, Abigail Dery, P.E. Project Engineer e. Abby.DeU5,,tcevt.com p. 80?.879.6339 .007 f. 802.978.0000 Ad§ %I.#- TRUDQELL cone mll ing Engineers Civil Engineering Land Surveying Landscape Architecture Environmental Services 478 .Blair Park Road, Villiston, Vermont 05495 ,v1v,,v.tcevt.com `A Please consider the environment before printing this email 1 ray From: Justin Rabidoux Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 2:43 PM To: ray Subject: RE: 88 Tech Park Way Ray, I met with Tech Park and their consultant today. Generally their analysis is heading in the right direction; they will be supplementing it with some more data and will resubmit it to me on Wednesday, January 14 for further review. I understand they are in front of the DRB on the 201h, I will turn my review around to you in a day. Justin From: ray Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8:02 AM To: Justin Rabidoux Subject: FW: 88 Tech Park Way Justin, Would you please review the attached Traffic Impact analysis and provide any comments back by January 9th. Thanks. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: Abby A. Dery, P.E. [mailto:Abby.Dery@tcevt.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 3:12 PM To: ray Subject: RE: 88 Tech Park Way See attached Traffic Impact Analysis for 88 Tech Park Way. From: ray [mailto:ray@sburl.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 1:58 PM To: Abby A. Dery, P.E. Subject: RE: 88 Tech Park Way 1 1 } -tce - December 15, 2014 Development Review Board City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: 88 Technology Park Way Traffic Impact Dear DRB: Technology Park Campus, LLC is seeking approval for a new building with 54,459 square feet of office space and 200 employees to be located on Lot 3 in Technology Park, or 88 Technology Park Way. The private Technology Park Way intersects Community Drive East, a public street, approximately 400 feet south of the intersection of Kimball Avenue, Gregory Drive, and Community Drive East. The purpose of this report is to analyze the impact of the traffic generated by the proposed project. Included are an analysis of the Tech Park Way/Community Dr. East intersection, and an analysis of the Kimball Ave/Community Dr. East/Gregory Dr. intersection, as an excess of 75 PM peak hour trips are anticipated to route through the intersection. Existing Conditions Background traffic volumes in the vicinity of the proposed project were determined using data from Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) and the Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization (CCMPO) Automatic Traffic Recorder (ATR) stations. The following table contains the ATR station number and the corresponding annual average daily traffic (AADT) in vehicles per day (vpd) for the most recent year that a count has taken place. Figure 2 is a map of the physical locations of each ATR. Figure 1: Location Map TRUDELL Consulting Engineers U �, Wpysjq, RA �..� 9 D450 SOBR60 4 ;'. ` SOBR56 Figure 2: ATR Station Locations Civil Engineering Land surveying Landscape Architecture Environmental Services Table 1: AADT at ATR Stations ATR Year AADT Location D412 2004 9,500 v d Kimball Ave, just east of Community Dr. East 2009 9,700 v d D451 2005 7,700 v d Kimball Ave, between Shunpike and Comm. West 2013 9,800 v d D450 2005 11,300 v d Kimball Ave, west of Community Drive West 2013 10,600 v d SOBR56 2003 1,600 v d Gregory Drive SOBR 60 2003 830 v d Shunpike Dr. 2008 700 v d Traffic growth rates within the study area over the past 10-years, as determined from historic data at local VTrans and CCRPC Automatic Traffic Recording Stations (ATR), vary station to station. Overall, per VTrans Continuous Traffic Counter Grouping Study and Regression Analysis (2013), traffic growth on urban roadways has leveled, so no growth factor was applied to project to a future build year. Trudell Consulting Engineers performed a manual Turning Movement Count (TMC) at the Community East 8, Kimball Avenue intersection on 12/5/2014 to determine the background traffic distribution. The overall PM peak hour for the study is from 4:30 to 5:30 PM. Turning movement short counts are generally adjusted to correspond to the design hour volume (DHV) for each intersection approach using VTrans' DHV Determination Based on AADTs and Highway Class -General Highway, however the approach volumes counted were greater than the calculated DHV and therefore no adjustment was made. Technology Park Way is a private street. Both Community Drive and Kimball Avenue are public roads under the jurisdiction of the City of South Burlington. Existing traffic generators within Technology Park are 124 Tech Park Way: a 54,459 square foot commercial building, 30 Community Drive: a 275,000 commercial complex, and a 65,000 sq. ft. commercial building located at 55 Community Drive. Traffic from these properties was captured during the recent turning movement count. Project Generated Traffic Project -generated traffic for the 54,459 sq. ft. commercial building was determined using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 9th Edition. The General Office Land Use Code most closely resembled the proposed land use. Expected daily and PM peak hour project generated traffic is shown on the table below, along with estimated entering/exiting distribution. Table 2: Proiect-Generated Traffic Trip Gen. Rate Enter Exit Total (per 1000 sq. ft. floor area Average Ln(T) = 414 414 828 Weekday 0.76 Ln 54.459 + 3.68 PM Peak Hour T = 1.12*54.459+78.45 24 116 140 Civil Engineering Land Surveying Landscape Architectnre Environmental Services Employing Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies could reduce the peak hour volume of project -generated trips. Encouraging carpools, transit use, allowing alternative work schedules or staggered scheduling would contribute to a reduction in trips. The building is sited on a bus route - accessible both via Community Drive and Kimball Avenue. Additionally, there is an existing shared -use path along the property's frontage. This infrastructure encourages alternative transportation modes and will also result in fewer peak hour trips. For the purpose of this report, no reduction was used in the analysis. Traffic Distribution Distribution of vehicle trips from project -generated traffic was determined using analogy to the short count. Given the short distance between Technology Park Way and the Kimball Ave/Community Drive East intersection, it is assumed that most, if not all, vehicles will access the site via Community East. The diagrams below illustrate the estimated turning movement distribution at the study intersections. Gregory Drive IN 4 Kimball Ave. r 12 Kimball Ave. 8 55 9 52 24 24 Technology Park Way 116 Community Drive East Figure 3: Project -Generated Trip Distribution Civil Engineering Lund Sur•veyiug Lstnds"ipe Architecture Eni-irournental Services Level of Service Vehicle delay, level of service (LOS), volume to capacity ratio (v/c ratio), and 95% queue length were calculated at the intersections using Synchro8 w/ 2010 HCM methodology. A peak hour factor of 1.0 with a 60 minute analysis period was used, as recommended by VTrans. Level of service grades correspond directly to a range of vehicular delay at intersection approaches. The following table describes the delay range, in seconds per vehicle, for each grade of LOS. Table 3: Level of Service Descriptions Level of Service Control Delay A <10 B >10 and < 15 C >15 and <25 D >25 and <35 E >35 and <50 F >50 The table below shows the results of the analysis for Technology Park Way and Community Drive. As indicated in the.tables, the intersection has adequate capacity for the addition of project -generated traffic. Level of service on the stop controlled side street remains a B under "Build" conditions and there will be no change to delay on Community Drive. Table 4: Intersection Analvsis-Technoloav Park Wav/Community Dr. 2015 No -Build 2015 Build Approach Delays LOS v/c ratio Queue Approach Delay s LOS v/c ratio Queue Eastbound 11.2 B 0.167 0.6 13.0 B 0.34 1.5 Northbound 7.4 A 0.001 0 7.4 A 0.001 0 The nearby intersection of Kimball Avenue and Community Drive was also analyzed to determine existing operations as well as impact of new trips. This intersection currently experiences delays exceeding the 50-second threshold for Level of Service "F" during the peak hour on the westbound approach, with vehicle queueing of 20 vehicles. The 4-way stop, while increasing safety, greatly reduces capacity on Kimball Avenue which experiences at least twice the traffic volume of Community East and Gregory Drive during the peak hour. Per the analysis results, with or without traffic from the proposed project, the intersection experiences peak hour delay and queues at the east and westbound approaches. Civil Engineering Lund Surveying Landscape Architecture Environmental Services ` Table 5: Intersection Analysis -Kimball Avenue/ Community Dr. East 2015 No -Build 2015 Build Delay s LOS v/c ratio QueueE20.5 LOS v/c ratio Queue Eastbound 43.6 E 0.848 12.3F 0.892 16.7 Westbound 83.1 F 0.953 21.1 F 1.03 25.8 Northbound 16.3 C 0.4 2.0C 0.538 3.5 Southbound 16.9 C 0.369 1.7C 1 0.396 2.0 Table 6: Net Change Summary De/ay Queue v/c ratio Notes Eastbound +20.9 sec delay + 4.4 veh +0.044 Very near capacity Westbound +36.3 sec delay +4.7 veh +0.077 At capacity Northbound +4.3 sec delay +1.5 veh +0.138 Below capacity Southbound +1.5 sec delay +0.3 veh +0.027 Below capacity The combination of the traffic volume and the 4-way stop control configuration has the intersection at capacity. The installation of stop control on Kimball Avenue reduced capacity significantly. However, the crash severity is reduced and safety increased by not allowing a free -flowing traffic on Kimball Avenue. Conclusion The proposed 54,459 sq. ft. office building located at 88 Technology Park Way will generate approximately 140 PM Peak Hour vehicle trips, based on ITE Trip Generation, 9th Edition. Traffic operations at the Technology Park Way/ Community Drive intersection is negligibly impacted by the proposed project. An analysis of the nearby intersection of Kimball Avenue & Community Drive East indicates that the 4-way stop controlled intersection is currently almost at capacity, with delay and queueing experienced at the east and westbound approaches. The addition of project -generated traffic will bring the intersection to capacity. Infrastructure is in place to encourage alternative commuting options and employing additional TDM strategies such as carpools and staggered scheduling will contribute to fewer peak hour trips. Technology Park Campus will work with the City of South Burlington on monitoring the intersection and future traffic improvement projects. Sincerely, TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) Abigail Dery, P.E. Project Engineer Encl. HCM Analysis Summary, cc. Evan Langfeldt Civil Engineeriatg'', Ldzid Srtrveying Landscape Architecture Environmental Services 47N Park" V Y t")5", 95 802 <'.47) ti.3 J.I 4r Ctiw. Ct ',;"4 i.ctii'Ci. Node # Zone. X East (ft): 9760 Y North (ft): 1 OG7[ Z Elevation (ft): Description Control Type U nsic HCM Control Type TWSC HCM Intersection Delay (s) 3.1 HCM I ntersection LOS — Analysis Period (Min) 1 Ped Walking Speed (ft/s) 4 Include upstream Signal? N c -6 FCommunity Dr- East -Fe.hnology Park Way Lanes and Sharing 114H U Traffic Volume (vph) 114 2 2 229 55 22 Conflicting Peds. (#/hr) 0 0 0 — — C Sign Control stop Stop Free free Free Free Storage Length (ft) I0 Vehicles in median storage Grade (%) I 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 1-00 to 1.00 1..0 im -1 0( Growth Factor, 1 A0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. 0C Heavy Vehicles j 2 21 2 2 2 2 Movement Flow Rate ... ...... .. 114 21 2 - — — - - ----------- 55 —_ 22 Right Turn Channelized — None None None Curb Radius (ft) Approach Data EB NBI Se Major/Minor Minor 2 Major 1 Major Conflicting Flow Rate All 299 66 77 0i C Critical Headway 6-4 6" 2 4.1 Critical Headway Stage 1 5,4 — — Critical Headway Stage 2 5.4 Follow-up Headway 3.5 3.31 2.2 Potential Capacity-1 M arreaver 632 998! 1522 Time blocked by platoon(%) Movement Capacity-1 Ivianeuvef ,891 5981 1522 Movement Capacity-2 Maneuver 691 - HCM Approach Control Delay (s).L 1 1., 21 0.11 HCM Approach LOS BI Capacity (vph) -1 6951 HCM Lane VIC Ratio f. a .101 0167, HCM Control Delay (s) 1 7,3681 cli 11,21 HCM Lane LOS A" A! BI HCM 95th Percentile Queue (veh) 0 Hr-IA 2010INTERSECTION Node # h' Zone: X East (ft): 97600 Y North (ft): 10670= Z Elevation (ft): 0 Description —. Control Type Unsigj i HCM Control Type TWSC HCM Intersection Delay (s) 5.41 HCM Intersection LOS Analysis Period (Min)" Ped Walking Speed (ftls) 4 Include upstream Signal? Na; g7 6Com .munity Drechnology . East & TPark Way fviOVEf,.4ENT SETTINGS � � EEL EBR a Lyrics 3nd'lharinq (#RL) €� Traffic Volume fvph) I 230 21 � 4\ � { NBL NBT ( • b B T SBR +1 229 T 55 4( Conflicting Peds Llt hr) I 0 01 0 -- [ Sign Control I Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Storage Length fft) 0 — Vehicles in median storage (#) I 0 — — - — Grade ('a) 0 — 0 0 — Peak Hour Factor I, 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.001 1.00 1.0( Growth Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 1.00 1.00 2 2 1.00 1.001 2 21 1.00 1.0( Movement Flow Rate 230 21 2 229 55 0 Right Turn Channelized I - Nonel — Nonej - None Curb Radius (ft) — - — — Approach Data _ EB NB SE Major/Minor Minor 2 Major 1 Major Conflicting Flow Rate -All 1 311 781 101 0 -- t Critical Headway 6.4 6.21 4.1 -- — — Critical Headway Stage 1 I 5.4 —— Critical Headway Stage 2 5.4 — — — — Follow-up Headway Potential Capacity-1 Maneuver 3.5 3.3 — 681 983 2.2 — 1491 — — — — Time blocked by platoon(%) Movement Capacity-1 Maneuver 1680 9831 1491 — — Movement Capacity-2 Maneuver 680 — HCM Approach Control Delay I.$) I HCM Approach LOS 131 B� 0.11 [ H0,1 2010 L44-4E NDL I NGT ( EELn1 ( ✓BT DH Capacity (vph) HCM LaneV1C Ratio 682 0.0010.34 HC11 Control Delay (s) 7.418' 01 131 - HCPA Lane LOS A Ai B�— HCM 95th Percentile Queue veh 0` 1.5 HC&1201OAVVGC I Community Dr. East/GregoryEast/Gregory DE & Kimball Ave 1206/2014 Intersedion Intersection Delay, s/veh 48 InterseobpnLOS E ^ Heavy Vehicles, % ^' ' 2 - 2 ^2 2 2 »2 2 '~ ~2 ~2 2 2 2 MvmtF|ow 0 47 280 28 O 40 447 16 O 164 20 150 Approach EB WI3 NB Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes HONLane V/CRutio 0.4 0.382 0.107 ^0S48 0.09 0.953 '0.36 ^ HCMControl Delay 17.4 152 11.9 47.3 11.6 89.3 16.9 HCNLane LOS C C B ~ E B - F C HCN 95th-tileO 2 1.8 0.4 12.3 0.3 211 17 205HMNo-Build 12/15/2O14Baseline SynnhmOLight Report HCM 2010 AWSC 3, Community Dr. East/Gregory Dr & Kimball Ave 12/16/2014 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Movement SBU SBIL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 0 44 11 98 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 44 11 98 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 Approach SB Opposing Approach NB Opposing Lanes 2 Conflicting Approach Left WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 Conflicting Approach Right EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 HCM Control Delay 16.9 HCM LOS C Lane 2015 PM No -Build 12/15/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Light Report AAD Page 2 HCM2010AVVGC I Community Dr. East/GregoryEast/Gregory Dr & Kimball Ave 12/16/2014 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 65 , Approach EB W13 NB Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Through Vol U 38 8 380 D 447 15 - "� ° + RTyo| °�~ ° � ,�� ^ 0 + ^202 O 26 O 16 ' 98 *m Lane Flow Rate 219 240 47 406 52 463 157 Geometry Grp � ^ � � �� _ � 7' 7 - 7 7 7 ^ 7 G — of(X) O�54G �523 O113 U�11 &125 1 U�U2 Departure Headway (Hd) � ` � 8.078 7847 8.64 ~ 8.075 8.626 8,083 ^ 9.222 Cnmergmmm.Y/N Yon Yes Yes Yea Yes Yon You Cap ' �� - ~� �� 407 466 421 455 418 454 398 ` ~ Service Time 6.587 5480 6.268 5710 6.326 5783 7.143 HCMLane V/CRatio . 0.538 0.515` 0112 0.882 0124 1.02 0396 HCMControl Delay 221 19 12� 70.5 12.6 131.4 18.3 HCN Lane LOS - C C 8 F B ' F C HCMQ5th-tibD 3.5 3.2 0.4 167 0.4 25.8 2 2015P0 Build 12U5/2814Baseline Synohm8Light Report HCM 2010 AWSC 3: Community Dr. East/Gregory Dr & Kimball Ave 12/16/2014 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR Vol, veh/h 0 44 15 98 Peak Hour Factor 100 100 100 100 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 44 15 98 Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 Approach SB Opposing Approach NB Opposing Lanes 2 Conflicting Approach Left WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 Conflicting Approach Right EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 HCM Control Delay 18.3 HCM LOS C Lane 2015 PM Build 12/15/2014 Baseline Synchro 8 Light Report AAD Page 2 ray From: Justin Rabidoux Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 12:34 PM To: ray Subject: FW: DRB Site Plan Review: 88 Technology Park Way Lot 3 From: Tom Dipietro Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 3:28 PM To: Justin Rabidoux Subject: DRB Site Plan Review: 88 Technology Park Way Lot 3 Justin, I reviewed the plans for 88 Technology Park Way that were prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers and last revised on 10/30/14. 1 would like to offer the following comments: • The project proposes to disturb greater than 1 acre of land and create greater than 1 acre of impervious area. Therefore, it will need construction (3-9020) and operational (3-9015) stormwater permits from the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. • The applicant should provide information on the existing State permit coverage for this project (permit number 1-1458) and how it will be updated/amended to facilitate this project. • The applicant proposes to make changes to the extended detention wetland outlet located on lot 2. Provide updated hydrologic model information related to the detention wetland and its treatment/detention of runoff from lots 2 and 3. • The DRB should confirm that the applicant has permission to make changes on adjacent lots (e.g. changes to wetland outlet, snow storage area shown crossing the lot boundary, and landscaping berm). My review assumes that these lots are also owned by Technology Park LLC, or that agreements are in place. • The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to regularly maintain all stormwater treatment and conveyance structures on site. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Thomas J. DiPietro Jr. Deputy Director Department of Public Works 104 Landfill Road South Burlington, VT 05403 Phone: (802) 658-7961 x108 Email: Tdipietro@sburl.com Web Site: www.sburl.com Twitter: @SBPubWorks Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. if you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 5th day of Dec. , 20 14, a copy of the foregoing public notice for Site Plan Review [type of application] # SP-14-60 [application number], was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) Technology Park Campus 30 Community Drive, Suite 4, South Burlington VT 05% 120 Kimball Corporation P.O. Box 4120, Burlington VT, 05406 Investors Corporation of Vb 30 Main St. #401, Burlington, VT 05401 124 Technology Park Way 55 Community Drive #402, South Burlington, VT 05403 Dated at Williston [town/city]. Vermont, this 5 day of December . 20 14 Printed Name: Karina Dailey Phone number and email: 802-879-6331 x1 10 karina.dailey@tcevt.com o�:roomrce� aOal:°ia nm'Iv°b.r P�°s o:ruo.'co..°mm e°clr..a Signature: Karina Dailey for Abby Derry Gek SON I . Date: necember,,5 21114 Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form. Rev. 1-2012 88 TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY TECHNOLOGY PARK - LOT 3 SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF A PROPOSED 54,459 S.F. OFFICE BUILDING, RELATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS, LANDSCAPING, UTILITIES, AND LIGHTING. Owner/Applicant Architect: Engineer: TECHNOLOGY PARK CAMPUS, LLC. STEVEN SCHENKER TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS (TCE) 55 COMMUNITY DRIVE #402 5224 SHELBURNE RD 478 BLAIR PARK ROAD SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 SHELBURNE, VT 05482 WILLISTON, VT 05495 (802)860-1691 (802)985-5595 (802)879-6331 "SITE PLAN RR SUBMISSION SET (NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION) DRAWING INDEX C1-00 COVER SHEET SUBDIVISION PLAN SHEET 1 OF 4 EASEMENT PLAT SHEET 3 OF 4 C1-01 LEGEND AND NOTES C1-02 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C2-01 OVERALL SITE PLAN L1-01 LANDSCAPING PLAN C5-01 DEMOLITION AND EPSC PLAN PHASE 1 C8-01 SEWER & WATER DETAILS C8-02 EROSION DETAILS C8-03 SITE DETAILS C8-04 STORM DETAILS L2-01 LIGHTING PLAN A5.1 BUILDING SECTIONS A4.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.0 BASEMENT PLAN A2.1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN A2.2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN A2.3 THIRD FLOOR PLAN A2.4 ROOF PLAN USE AND INIERPREIATION Of THE DRAWINGS BEFORE USING THESE PLANS ENSURE THAT YOU HAVE THE LATEST REVRION LAST REVISED: I 10/30/14 ISSUED FOR PERMITTING TCE PROJECT NO: 2014088 ,%loop TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS .m aw P,Ra« RU.D I a,s,an. �va,ax, os.n E pF DRAFT PLANT LIST KEY SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON WIRE OWN. SIZE COMMENTS AR Ace rubtun Red Maple 2 2 1/2'J' B&B 'Red Sunset' AC AmalacWiercanada1Ks15 Serviceberry 8 5'HT' B&B SINGLE STEM CR Comus Facerna Gray Dbgvood 11 2 gal. CON. CSI CulTltls sericea Rod -wig 12 3 gal CON. Tsanti Dogwood N /lux kerlici/1Ma Jim Dan* 8 Berry Nice 11 3 gel. CONE J. Dal M Barry Nice' Winterberry, GTS G/a yS. to-1-11— Shad emester 32 2 1/2"Z B&B Shadernaelee Honeylpcust JHBH Jump— IronzbNalis Creepirg Junpw 322 2 gel. CONT. Ear FbrboK FP FiRipsi t'le rubra Me2doM weer 157 2 gal. CON. Venusta MSA MOWS Sargemii Sargent Crabapple 6 2 1/2'-3' B&B PC PKUO cagary a Cleveland Select Peal 8 2 117-T B&B 'Chant leer PG Picea gletica While S(nlce 3 8'-7' B&B PN Pads nigm Ausidan Pme 3 6-T BOB PS Pilels stTObus while Pine 4 6-7' B&B OP Ouetcus PaW _ Pin Oak 15 TRANSPLANT FROM ALONG TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY Sty SP—a/Pporvca Srbva nd Spima 82 3gel. CON. Stlavnbund SR SYMVa ra0culata JapanaPa Tree Lilac 18 21/2'J' 888 SJS SPJaeaJAPU, a SIT—[— Spi— 29 3gel. OONT. Shimbare TC Tax. UHS;Rfala ,krparsese YeW lie W-211" CONE Nene TOS TOuja w11LAXT ks 'Slrnaragd' Snraragd Alt-.(- 9 68 B&B 3'IAYER SHREDDED BARK MULCH AB (TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE 1 ARCH11K110VER PERMEABLE WEED FABRICS PLACE CLOSE TO VVyp NOT � 3 SAUCER RIM BACKHLL WITH EXCAVATED MATERIAL. IF SOIL a PREDOMINAmr CLAY OR GRAVEL INCORPORATE ORGANIC MATERIAL AS DRIKTED ANDAPPROVED BYIANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PLANT PIT WIDEN 3.B NOTES: MUL pw 'PLANT SHRUB Al SAME DEPTH AT HAD PREVIOUSLY WNHRU$ •LOOSEN. CUT. B REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP W3 Of ROOT BALL -SHREDDED BARK MULCH AND WEED BARRIER FABRIC TO M CONTINUOUS WHEN USED IN BEDS BALL AND BURLAP SHRUB HOME - STAKE ONLY RN EXTREMELY WNDY CONDITIONS AS APPROVED BY IANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ' R KNOWN PLANT M N BARKED IRFES THE SAME SUN ORIENTATION SAME SUNOIYPR�Y/ENER WRAP WITH W RA RAP �- �� -W 'BURLAP: LOOSEN. CUT ,BREMOVE HATURAI BURUP FROM TOP 11201 R.I BALL. .� REMOVE SYNMFrIC BURLAP 'WIRE BA PUT AWAYY BO BORON RINGS. AR11AlLT BACKBLL THEN REMOVE RENAMING WIRE. • PUNT TREE TO EXPOSE ROOT SURE. MAIN ORDER ROOT, AND IN SANE ORIENTAIKNI AS TREE WAS GROWN. DO NOT PUNT TOO DEEP DiA - • r LAYER SHREDDED BARK MULCH MULCH RING 1T0 BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE 6' CLEARANCE ARCHITEC110VERPERMEAILE WEED FABRIC' DO NOT PUCE NEXT TO TIME TRUNK SLOPEGRWND IO DRAN 4'SAUCER RIM DIG TREE M ONLY AS DEEP AS ROOT BALL BACKPRL WITH EXCAVATED MATERIAL.IF SOIl4 PREDOMINATELY PLANT PII WIDTH CLAY OR GRAVEL INCORPORATE --- - - - --- e F BALL D" ---- ORGANiC MATERIAL AS DIRECTED AND APPROVED ' tREI PLANTING DETAIL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT EX/Si. EVERGREENS M Il . S, t � DRAF' BOULDERS 3 PG 41V R CSI r- 6 CR I CSI a 011 01 MSA 71V 3 MSA 2 OP (f) 1 w V EXI! EVERGREENS �Jc 2 AC SNOW FORAGE 4 PS I' _ 2 GTS 2 GTS I ` 1 -.-- IO SJS 1 0O 8 GTS I �— 1 OP 00 rt'r' i �] SJS �Q,y (PHASE 11)� 2 OP lrl f,rJJ11 24 SNS 2 AC EXIST OP V B SIR J i rr� sI 10 SR �7L 13SJS ` h 61 INCH [I *MM 3 TOS 3 STORY OFFICE BUILDING 348.33 Ay 2D JNBN 57 FR 25 TIC 4K 62 JNBN 3TOS 310S 4 AC 18 SNS lye ------- 10 GTS Graphic $cale DRAFT Fast v 30 0 30 60 90 120 4/I� tce - TRUDELL CONSULTING ENGINEERS No Desclpflon Dole Use of These DawMgs UNess ofbalw'Ise noted. IMse IP_rgs are branded fa PI"iX nK" 0.-1 Podbnolbn--KB Pkne+P lilie, d b .Y. Mom RW Mg--aURIRriNes. Iney de noI blended w comm:cBm ba.X19s VNeu tiered w vldl 2 DIVYCYow.gs spec alT "axed FdC Iraclbn'are Inlergeci fo be used -'ion wRH docanrarlh sTxclRc ibn, /c Magr emenls OrRi to Yx fuBy codO led otlrerd P rhttllrg Wt rql erRled fo IR; ArcH t t. IfPPPAc N Tire. I3rowX19s shU nol be ased Id conshucibn bYOW. CpnfOCl iCE fa dw cansM1Vclion s✓veyeg services d ro oblOn eleoaarvc tlolo suRPLLe Id cdulrvclion Ioydlt. 3.These 1}owRgi— ipecillc Io IM Project dantl ae n01 Aelade. As ryRVnlents ofChisdwc . Muse bowrgi, vb s Mdeot IdraWi a by TCE are fi axc4iby Properly. Cent, ex to sir bowiXp mw orYv be mode a ICE R de 1*CrX,Rea. fnev shoA be Uraugnt to tHa anenfion of iCE krlrr�edialeM1'. 4. By ase of Mesa baWi g Id conseuc— of Me Prgacl. the O..+td redesenh Rso May love reviewed, pop —L aM IXcepled R» bawksgs prld Owe met WI ll fo K of LLPei,v PdfwUducpil?s blare mesa Plve preperly cPPrenPlea nd ospech or W Prgecl Erb shown Krc4dxg an area mewPred a rnrnmum fie IBl Feel omdld OM boAOi'g s. II h tna lea's responSiMSn ro en:are tMi coPv comPlns fN DRAFT For Permitting Only Pr f TBIe 88 Technology Park Way Technology Park - Lot 3 South Burlington, Vermont Landscaping Plan Dab: 10/3D/14 Project Namber. X14088 UawTI By, kP Project Engineer: a`D ApPcWd BY: ............. BaW Book: Ll -01 ray From: Terry Francis Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 4:52 PM To: ray; Paul Conner Cc: Doug Brent Subject: DRB comments Good Afternoon: Just wanted to follow-up on the a few projects you folks sent over for comment: Willow Brook Lane ( formerly Dog Lane?): Just a note that the Hammerhead at the end of the lane must accommodate FD apparatus- post snow storage area. The hammer head area shall be posted " no parking vehicles towed at owners expense". Hydrant location is acceptable. 88 Technology Park: Requires sprinkler protection, Class 3 standpipe in egress stair tower, fire alarm system include CO detection and a stretcher compliant elevator ( current plan shows an undersized car). FDC must be located within 100' of a hydrant ( hydrants not shown on submittals) 1741 Spear St: Spoke with Shane Mullin this PM regarding (2) SFH situated 500' and 650' off Spear St. on a shared driveway. Driveway width has to accommodate FD access, and the homes must have NFPA 13D sprinkler system installed. DC Terence Francis, CFI Fire Marshal South Burlington Fire Department 575 Dorset St. S. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4134 Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. 88 Technology Park Trudell Consulting Engineers 12/1/14 Parking lot islands should be filled with loam or sandy loam to a minimum depth of 2.5 feet to provide adequate soil volume to support tree growth The 15 Pin Oaks that are proposed to be transplanted were part of landscaping requirement for a previous plan and may not fully qualify towards the required landscape budget(consult w/Planning and Zoning) #SP-07-67 Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The City of South Burlington Stormwater Superintendent reviewed the plans and provided comments in a memo dated August 27, 2007. The applicant has replied to the Stormwater Superintendent and has provided answers to the questions previously outlined. Furthermore, the Board understands that the project will require review by the appropriate State stormwater authorities. The Board is not concerned about the stormwater treatment aspects of the plan but recommends that the applicant continue to work with the South Burlington Stormwater Superintendent as work progresses. The project incorporates access, circulation, and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. The applicant is proposing to access the new building via a 26' wide private access road that connects to the eastern leg of Community Drive. This road will be accompanied to the south by a five (5) foot wide concrete sidewalk. The private road shall remain private. Legal documents (in the form of a private road agreement) shall be submitted, reviewed, and recorded to ensure that this is the case. At this time, the Board does not have any concerns regarding the circulation or traffic management. The proposed 54,459 square feet of general office space is estimated to generate 139.8 PM peak hour vehicle trip ends. The property was previously granted 647 trip ends. 404.17 vehicle trip ends are allocated to the building at 30 Community Drive. 159.5 vehicle trip ends are allocated to the building at 55 Community Drive, for a total of 703.47 vehicle trip ends. Therefore, the proposed building will exceed the permitted number of vehicle trip ends by 56.47 vehicle trip ends. The Board has no concerns at this time regarding the total number of trip ends, nor does the Board feel that a new traffic study is required. However, the applicant shall pay for the increased trip ends, minus any credits as determined by the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The plans that the applicant submitted depict a significant amount of wetlands on the subject property. The applicant is proposing to encroach into a delineated Class II wetland buffer. The applicant has submitted a Conditional Use Determination which was issued from the State in 2003 and subsequently re -approved several times, most recently for the period from March 26, 2006 to April 12, 2009, for a previously proposed building. The applicant has stated that the degree of wetland and buffer impact is no greater than was originally granted in the CUD. The applicant has relocated the dumpster facility out of the wetland buffer, and is proposing significant vegetative screening to delineate the wetland buffer. The Board is pleased with the proposed plan and finds that this criterion is being met to the best ability of the applicant. -3— TRUDELL -tce Landscape Architecture PLANT LIST Lot 4 Technology Park Way 14-088 Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Ben Oxender 111312014 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Amelanchier canadensis Serviceberry Quercus palustris Pin Oak Spiraea nipponica Snowmound Spirea 'Snowmound' Thuja occidentalis 'Smaragd' Smaragd Arborvitae RECEFIVED QUAN. SIZE PRICE/PLANT TOTAL 6 5'-6' $315.00 $1,890.00 12 TRANSPLANT FROM ALONG TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY 65 3 gal. $37.50 $2,437.50 9 5'-6' $187.50 $1,687.50 TOTAL $6,015.00 Civil Engineering Land Surveying Landscape Architecture Environmental Services ray From: ray Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 11:15 AM To: 'Abby A. Dery, P.E.' Subject: Placard Ready - 88 Technology Park Way - Site Plan Application The above referenced application will be reviewed by the DRB on December 16th. Please stop by the office to pick up the placard which must be displayed on the property by December 5, 2014. Thanks. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainability.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. ]f you have received this message in error, please notify us Immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. -tce TRUDELL Landscape ArchitecturePLANT LIST 88 Technology Park Way 14-088 Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Ben Oxender 111312014 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE PRICEIPLANT TOTAL Acerrubrum Red Maple 2 2 1/2"-3" $737.00 $1,474.00 'Red Sunset' Amelanchier canadensis Serviceberry 2 5'-6' $315.00 $630.00 SINGLE STEM Corpus racemosa Gray Dogwood 11 2 gal. $45.00 $495.00 Cornus sericea Red -twig 12 3 gal. $37.50 $450.00 'Isanti' Dogwood Ilex verticillata Jim Dandy 8 Berry Nice 11 3 gal. $67.50 $742.50 'Jim Dandy 8 Berry Nice' Winterberry Gleditsia tnacanthos Shademaster 32 2 1/2%3" $687.50 $22,000.00 'Shademaster' Honeylocust Juniperus horizontalis Creeping Juniper 322 2 gal. $40.00 $12,880.00 'Bar Harbor' Fillipendula rubra Meadowsweet 157 2 gal. $37.50 $5,887.50 Venusta' Malus sargentii Sargent Crabapple 6 2 1/2"-3" $580.00 $3,480.00 Pyrus calleryana Cleveland Select Pear 8 2 1/2"-3" $610.00 $4,880.00 'Chanticleer' Picea glauca White Spruce 3 6'-7' $427.50 $1,282.50 Pinus nigra Austrian Pine 3 6'-7' $427.50 $1,282.50 Pinusstrobus White Pine 4 6'-7' $315.00 $1,260.00 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 3 TRANSPLANT FROM ALONG TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY Spiraea nipponica Snowmound Spirea 17 3 gal. $37.50 $637.50 'Snowmound' Syringa reticulata Japanese Tree Lilac 18 2 1/2%3" $540.00 $9,720.00 Spiraea japonica Shirobana Spiraea 29 3 gal. $37.50 $1,087.50 'Shirobana' Taxus cuspidata Japanese Yew 118 18"-24" $105.00 $12,390.00 'Nana TOTAL $80,579.00 Engineering LandscapeCivil Land Surveying Architecture Environmental Services October 31, 2014 Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 RE: 88 Technology Park Way Site Plan Application Dear Ray: Ad§ *1 00*� TRUDELL Consulting Engineers On behalf of our client, Technology Park Campus, LLC, Trudell Consulting Engineers (TCE) has prepared a Site Plan submission for DRB review and consideration. The applicant is still seeking approval for a new building with 54,459 square feet of office space and 200 employees to be located on Lot 3 in Technology Park. The building will be roughly a mirror image of the existing office building located immediately to the west on Lot 2. The lot is located in the Mixed Industrial -Commerical zoning district (IC). Access will be via the private Technology Park Way, off of Community Drive. Site improvements consist of a 194 space parking area, including 8 accessible spaces; landscaping and berms to screen parking areas; and energy -efficient LED pole - mounted and building -mounted lighting. Project -generated traffic is expected to be approximately 140 PM peak hour trips, as calculated using ITE Trip Generation, 9'" Edition. Minimum building setbacks identified on the plans have been increased per 3.07.D.2.a to allow for an increased building height to 50 ft (max allowable in IC is 35 ft). A 15 ft waiver is requested and therefore the minimum front and rear setbacks have increased by 15 ft each, and the side setbacks have increased by 7.5 ft. In addition to the application and Site Plan package, we are submitting the following supporting materials: • Lighting Plan and Specification Sheets • Plant List with Cost Estimate • Stormwater Design Brief • Building Elevations, Floor Plans, and Sections Page 2 of 2 88 Technology Park Way October 31, 2014 Based on our understanding of the requirements for Site Plan review, we believe the submittal of material for this proposed project to be complete. If you have any questions or comments regarding this application, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at abby.dery@tcevt.com. Regards, Abigail Dery Project Engineer cc: Evan Langfeldt Enclosed: Site Plan Submission Civil Engineering Land Surveying Landscape Architecture Environmental Services ray From: Abby A. Dery, P.E. <Abby.Dery@tcevt.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 2:09 PM To: ray Subject: Re: 88 Technology Park Way Yes, the building will be general office. Abby On Nov 5, 2014, at 1:57 PM, "ray" <ray@sburl.com> wrote: Abby, Please confirm that the proposed use in this office building will be general office and not medical office. This was not clear on the application, the description was just "office". Thanks. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainabilitV.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. PLANT LIST 88 Technology Park Way 14-088 Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Ben Oxender 101812014 TRUDELL -tce "141� Lam-Iscape Architecture SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME QUAN. SIZE PRICE/PLANT TOTAL Acer rubrum 'Red Sunset' Amelanchier canadensis Corpus racemosa Cornus sericea 'Isanti' Ilex verticillata 'Jim Dandy & Berry Nice' Gleditsia tnacanthos 'Shademaster' Juniperus horizontalis 'Bar Harbor' Fillipendula rubra Venusta' Malus sargenth Pyrus calleryana 'Chanticleer' Picea glauca Pinus nigra Pinus strobus Quercus palustris Red Maple Serviceberry Gray Dogwood Red -twig Dogwood Jim Dandy & Berry Nice W interberry Shademaster Honeylocust Creeping Juniper Meadowsweet Sargent Crabapple Cleveland Select Pear White Spruce Austrian Pine White Pine Pin Oak Spiraea nipponica Snowmound Spirea 'Snowmound' Syringa reticulata Japanese Tree Lilac Spiraea japonica Shirobana Spiraea 'Shirobana' Taxus cuspidata Japanese Yew 'Nana Thuja occidentalis 'Smaragd' Smaragd Arborvitae 2 21/2"-3" $737.00 $1,474.00 11 5'-6' $315.00 $3,465.00 SINGLE STEM 6 2 gal. $45.00 $270.00 12 3 gal. $37.50 $450.00 11 3 gal. $67.50 $742.50 32 21/2%3" $687.50 $22,000.00 322 2 gal. $40.00 $12,880.00 157 2 gal. $37.50 $5,887.50 6 21/2"-3" $580.00 $3,480.00 8 21/2"-3" $610.00 $4,880.00 3 6'-7' $427.50 $1,282.50 3 6'-7' $427.50 $1,282.50 5 6'-7' $315.00 $1,575.00 15 TRANSPLANT FROM ALONG TECHNOLOGY PARK WAY 84 3 gal. $37.50 $3,150.00 18 21/2"-3" $540.00 $9,720,00 29 3 gal. $37.50 $1,087.50 118 18"-24" $105.00 $12,390.00 9 5'-6' $187.50 $1,687.50 TOTAL $87,704.00 l DESCRIPTION The EPIC Collection combines custom luminaire flexibility with high quality construction. Through a modular design, the EPIC Collection can be dressed to suit any application. Recognizing evolving environmental and legislative trends, EPIC Collection delivers world -class LED optical and performance solutions to the decorative luminaire marketplace. SPECIFICATION FEATURES Construction TOP: Cast aluminum classical top housing maintains a nominal 1/8" sidewall thickness. Top attaches to cast aluminum mounting arm hub with four (4) stainless steel fasteners. One-piece silicone gasket between mounting hub and top casting seals out moisture and contaminants. MIDSECTION: Continuous silicone gaskets seal lens to top casting and shade. The following mid -section options feature cast aluminum construction and stainless steel assembly hardware: SO Solid Rings. SHADES: Heavy gauge precision spun aluminum shades offer superior surface finish and consistency in form. DOORFRAME: Die-cast aluminum 1/8" thick door and door frame seal to underside of shade with a thick wall continuous silicone gasket. Mounting hub ships attached to mounting arm. Optics DISTRIBUTION: Choice of twelve (12) patented, high efficiency AccuLED Optjcs'"", that maximize light collection and direction distribution onto the application region. Each optical lens is precision -manufactured via injection -molding, then precisely arranged and sealed on the board media. LEDs: High output LEDs, 50,000+ hours life at >70% lumen maintenance, offered standard in 4000°K (+/-275K) CCT and nominal 70 CRI. Electrical ELECTRICAL TRAY: Driver and related electrical componentry are mounted to one piece tray. Quick disconnect wiring plugs allows for tray removal during routine maintenance. DRIVER: LED drivers are potted and heat sunk for optimal performance and prolonged life. Standard drivers feature electronic universal voltage (120-277V/50-60hz), > 0.9 power factor, less than 20% harmonic distortion and feature ambient temperature range of +40°C (104°F) down to minimum starting temperature of -30°C (- 22°F). Shipped standard with Cooper Lighting proprietary circuit imum tight 3mml NOTE: See configurations for more detailed information. COOPER Lighting wwwcooperlighting.com module designed to withstand 10kV of transient line surge. All LED LightBARs'" and drivers are mounted to dedicated mounting trays and are easily replaced by use of quick disconnects for ease of wiring. Options to control light levels, energy savings and egress capabilities (separate circuit) are available. Finish Housing is finished in 5-stage Super TGIC polyester powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness for superior protection against fade and wear. LightBAR'" cover plates are standard white and may be specified to match finish of luminaire housing. Standard colors include black, bronze, grey, white, dark platinum and graphite metallic. RAL and custom color matches available. Consult Outdoor Architectural Colors brochure for a complete selection. Warranty EMM LED features a five-year limited warranty. N V U E ® 41penargy EMM EPIC MODERN MEDIUM LED 1 - 4 LightBARs Solid State LED DECORATIVE AREA D[SIGN iials CONSORTIUM r CERTIFICATION DATA UUcUL Listed ISO 9001 IP66 LightBARs ARRA Compliant LM79 / LM80 Compliant 3.5 G Vibration Tested ENERGY DATA Electronic LED Driver >0.9 Power Factor <20% Total Harmonic Distortion 120-277V/50 & 60hz, 347V/60hz, 480V/60hz -30"C Minimum Temperature 40°C Ambient Temperature Rating EPA Effective Projected Area: (Sq. Ft.) 0.94 SHIPPING DATA Approximate Net Weight: 45 lbs. yes Ihill oET AVU101787 2013-01-28 08:56:14 f EMM EPIC MODERN MEDIUM LED POWER AND LUMENS BY BAR COUNT Number of DISTRIBUTION UghtBAR9 Power Currant CN Current ] T2 T3 T4 Sl2 SL3 SL4 5M0 5W0 5X0 RW SLR/ [Watts] 120V [A] 277V [A] SLL 7 LED LIGHTBAR C01 27 0.23 0.13 1,873 1,866 1,817- 1,836 - 1,756 1,807 1,937 1,907 1,911 1,847 1,704 CO2 54 0.46 0.21 3,716 3,701 3,605 3,642 3A 3,585 3,843 3,783 3,792 3,665 3,380 CO3 77 0.65 0.29 5,475 5,453 5,311 5,366 5,134 5,282 5,661 5,573 5,586 5,399 4,980 C04 101 0.86 0.37 7,282 7,253 7064 7,137 6,829 7,026 7,530 7413 7,430 7,181 6,624 21 LED LIGHTBAR 801 27 0.23 0.13 2,304 2,295 2,235 2,258L4�2 2,223 2,382 2,345 2,351 2,272 2,096 _- __.,.. -- -- -.-. _. _. _ 602 51 0.43 0.20 4,571 4,553 4,434 4,480 4,410 4,726 4,653 4,664 4,508 4,158 803 73 0.62 0.28 6,734 6,707 6,533 6,610 6,497 6,963 6,855 6,871 6,641 6,125 804 95 0.81 0.35 8,957 8,921 8,689 8,779 6,642 9,262 9,118 9,139 8,833 8,148 LUMEN MULTIPLIER Ambient Lumen Temperature Multiplier 10°C 1.04 15°C 1.03 25°C 1.00 40"C 0.96 PRODUCT CONFIGURATIONS HOUSING MID SECTION SHADE MOUNTING OPTION o-_ Solid 3.4" H x 9.9" W Height from ceiling equals calculated height I f fixture plus MA Straight Narrow pendant length ---- 6.6" H x 19.1"W and 7/8" Modem - 9.3" H x 8.8" W Window 3.4" H x 9.9" W Straight Wide 5.1" H x 23.9"W Louvered 3.4" H x 9.9"W 00000 Slot 3.4" H x 9.9"W Bell 8"Hx24"W Solid Rings 3.4" H x 12"W Flute 6" H x 22.5"W 00 COOPER Lighting NOTE: Specifications and dimensions subject to change without notice. AVU101787 Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com 2013-01-28 08:56:14 www.cooperlighting.com Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801 2013.02-27 17.'02.'41 EMM EPIC MODERN MEDIUM LED ORDERING INFORMATION Sample Number: EMM-B04-LED-E1-T2-FL-BK-2L product Product Family ' ' Distribution Mid Section Type ` Finish a Accessories " Modern Medium T2=Type II SO=Solid BK=Black VA8101-XX=Bishop Well Mount Ann T3=Type III VVN=Window AP=Grey VA6102-XX=Bishop Wall Mount Annw/ Number of ' • T4=Type IV LV=Louvered g2=Bronze Cross Rod Lightbara 5MQ=Type V Square Medium ST=Slot VVR=White VA6103-XX=Traditional Wall Mount Ann 607=(1] 21 LED LightBAR VAeIOa-x%= Traditional wan Mount Arm w/ B02= [2] 21 LED LightBARs 5WQ- Type V Square Wide SR= Solid Rings DP= Dark Platinum 45' Strap 603° [3] 21 LED LightBARs 5XQ- Type V Square Extra GM: Graphite Metallic VA6105-XX= Bishop Single Pole Mount Ann Wide Shade Type VA81g8-XX= Bishop Single Pole Mount Arm B04: [4) 21 LED LightBARs RVy= Rectangular Wide Spill Straight Narrow Options w/ Cross Rod C01= [1) 7 LED LightBARs SL2= Type II w/Spill Control Syy= Straight Wide 2L= Two Circuits] VA6107-XX= Bishop Twin Pole Mount Arm CO2= [2] 7 LED LightBARs $L3= Type III w/Spill Control gL= Bell LCF= LightBAR Cover Plate Matches VA610a-XX= Bishop Twin Pole Mount Arm w/ Cross Rods CO3= [31 7 LED LightBARs SL4= Type IV w/Spill Control FL: Flute Housing Finish VA6109-XX: Traditional Single Pole Mount C04- (4] 7 LED LightBARs SLL' 90 Degree Spill Light 7060= 7 0 CRI/6000K CCTe Arm Eliminator Left 8030= 80 CRI13000K CCe VA8110-XX` Traditional Single Pole Mount Lamp Type SLR= 90 Degree Spill Light MS-LXX= Motion Sensor for orVoffe Upper Bar Arm w/ Rounded lSingle yp8111-XX= Single Pole +s LED- Solid State Light Eliminator Right g operation Mount A w/ Rounded Emitting Diodes MS/X-LXX' Motion Sensor for 1e Lower ea bi-level switching VA6112-XX: Traditional Single Pole Mount VoltagePendant Arm .145 Degree Upper Be, PM48 Mount VA8113-XX= Traditional Single Pole If Ell: Electronic 120-277V ( ) or Specify Pendant Length th++ 9 Mount Arm w/ 45 Degree 347= 347V Inches (XX) Lower Bar 480=480V VA6114-xx: Traditional Single Pole Mount Ann w/ 45 Degree Upper Strap VA6116-XX=Traditional Twin Pole Mount Arm VA8117-XX=Traditional Twin Pole Mount Arm w/ Rounded Upper Bars VA6118-XX=Traditional Twin Pole Mountie Arm w/ Rounded Lower Bars VA6119-XX=Traditonal Twin Pole Mount Arm w/ 45 Degree Upper Bars VA6120.XX=Traditional Twin Pole Mount,. Aml w/ 45 Degree Lower Bars VA6121-XX=Traditional Twin Pole Mount Arm w/ 45 Degree Upper Straps VA6122-XX=EMMMast Arm Adapter OAIRA1016=NEMA Photocontrol - Multi -Tap OA/RA7027=NEMA Photocontrol -480V OA/RA7201=NEMA Photocontrol - 347V Accessary Options V=Victorian Finia114 M=Modem Finia114 A=Architectural Finialu N=Nostalgic Fmian4 R=NEMA Twistlock Photocell Raceptadels Notes: 1 DesignLights`"Consortium Qualified. Refer to www.designlights.org Qualified Products List under Family Models for details. 2 Arm not included. Order separately. See accessories. 3 Standard 4000 K CCT and greater than 70 CRI. 4 21 LED LightBAR powered at 350mA, 7 LED LightBAR powered at 1A. 5 Midsection not illuminated during operation. 6 Custom and RAIL color matching available upon request. Consult your customer service representative for further information. 7 Low-level output varies by bar count. Consult factory. Requires quantity two or more LightBARS. 6 Consult customer service for lead times and lumen multiplier. 9 Sensor mounted to the luminaire. Available in 801 - B06 and C01 - C06 configurations. Replace XX with mounting height in feet for proper lens selection, (i.e., MS-1_25). Consult factory for additional information. 10 Sensor mounted to luminaire. Available in B02 - B06 and CO2 - COB configurations. Replace X with number of bars operating in low output mode and replace XX with mounting height in feet for proper lens selection, (i.e., MS/3-1_25). Maximum 4 bars in low output mode. Consult factory for additional information. 11 PM option must be used with INVUE Pendant Kit only. Includes 48" long pendant pipe, swivel hanger and canopy cover. Other pendant lengths can be specified in inches (XX). Minimum pendant length is 9.5". For lengths avobe 48', consult Invue Lighting Systems representative. 12 Order separately, replace XX with color suffix. 13 Add as suffix to accessory. Example: VA6109-BK-R. 14 Only available with Traditional arms. 15 Not available with finials, pendant mount (PM48) or bishop wall mounts. 16 Requires use of 4" O.D. round straight pole. COOPER fe Lighting NOTE: Specifications and dimensions subject to change without notice. AVU101787 Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com 2013-01-28 08:56:14 www.cooperlighting.com Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801 2013-02-27 17:02:41 INVUE DECORATIVE POLE COLLECTION 8'-30' Mounting Height DECORATIVE POLE DETAILS Decorative pole bases are manufactured of 356.2 cooper free cast aluminum. Bases maintain a minimal wall thickness of .250 inches. Extruded smooth or fluted shafts are manufactured of 6063 aluminum and are circumferentially welded to the base. Anchor bolt locations are cast within the base. Anchor bolts are hot dip galvanized steel. Poles are finished in a premium TGIC polyester Powder coat for superior weatherability characteristics. ORDERING INFORMATION BASE TYPE MOUNTING HEIGHT (ft.) SHAFT SIZE WALL SHAFT TYPE LUMINAIRE COLOR OPTIONS ASP=Aspen 08=6' at Base THICKNESS RS=Round S=Tenon for MESA` AP=Grey C=Provision for Convenience BWR=Broadway 10=10' 4=4" (gauge) Straight 4-Tenon for BK=Black Outlet CHI=Charleston 12=12' 5=5" 0=.125 RT=Round EPIC Collection' BZ=Bronze E-GFI Convenience Outlet CPR=Chesapeake 14=14' 6=6" 1-.156' Tapered ` DP=Dark Platinum G=Ground Lug STL=Seattle 16=16' 8=8" 2=.188 SF=Straight WH=White TAM=Tampa 18=18' 3=.250 4 Fluted GN=Hartford Green UBN=Utica 20=20' GM=Graphite Metallic WA3=Washington 3 25-25' 30-30' NOTES: 1 Round Tapered only. 2 0.125" thickness not available on STL, TAM, ASP or BWR. 3 0.156" thickness available on TAM and BWR only. 4 0.250" thickness available on STL, ASP and BWR only. 5 "RP' shafts are tapered to 4" on 8WR only. 6 Provided with 3" O.D. Tenon. 7 Provides 4" Tenon on 5" shafts or no tenon on 4" shafts allowing slip over of EPIC Collection, SLIDE or FLITE arm accessories. See EPIC Collection brochure for additional information on arms. Some EPIC arms require 4" O.D. round straight poles only. STL Seattle Base Height: 23" Bolt Circle: 8" Shaft Pole Diameter Height 4" 8', 10', 12',14', 16' Mem Lighting www.cooperlighting.com TAM Tampa Base Height: 30" Bolt Circle: 8.5" Shaft Pole Diameter Height 4" 10', 12', 14', 16', 18' BWR Broadway Base Height: 42" Bolt Circle: 12" Shaft Pole Diameter Height 8" x 4" 8'. 10', 12'. 14'. 16% 18' 20', 25', 30' ASP Aspen Base Height: 40" Bolt Circle: 15" Shaft Pole Diameter Height 4" 8% 10', 12% 14% 16', 18' WA3 Washington 3 Base Height: 21" Bolt Circle: 10 3/4" Shaft Pole Diameter Height 4" 8% 10', 12' 5" 8% 10'. 12', 14', 16', 6" 12', 14', 16', 18' NOTE: Specifications and dimensions subject to change without notice. Consult your representative for additional options and finishes. AVU070423 DECORATIVE POLE COLLECTION CHI Charleston Base Height: 32" Bolt Circle: 10 3/4" Shaft Pole Diameter Height 4" 8'.10'.12' 5" 8', 10', 12', 14', 16' 6" 12', 14', 16'. 18' 000 COOPER Lighting CPR UBN Chesapeake Utica Base Height: 46 5/8" Base Height: 31 3/8" Bolt Circle: 13 1/4" Bolt Circle: 12 112" Shaft Pole Shaft Pole Diameter Height Diameter Height 4" 8', 10', 12'. 14' 4" 8', 10', 12' 5" 8', 10'. 12', 14' 5" 8', 10'. 12' NOTE: Specifications and dimensions subject to change without notice. Visit our web site at www.cooperlighting.com Customer First Center 1121 Highway 74 South Peachtree City, GA 30269 770.486.4800 FAX 770.486.4801 AVU070423 INVUE DESCRIPTION Pole mount arms are designed to fit both medium EMM/ECM and large EML/ECL series housings. Arms feature a precision welded cast aluminum mounting hub for attachment of fixture head to arm with four (4) stainless steel fasteners. Wall mount arms compliment pole mount luminaires and attractively transition fixture scale in lower mounting height pedestrian environments. Wall mount arms are designed to fit both medium EMM/ECM and large EML/ECL series housings. Arms feature a precision welded cast aluminum mounting hub for attachment of fixture head to arm with four (4) stainless steel fasteners. ARMS SPECIFICATIONS r-- 33 1 /2' [852 mml ---I 12' (304 mm] [51 mm] 54 3/16' 11376 mm1 BISHOP SINGLE POLE MOUNTARM [VA6105, VA6154, VA6005, VA60541 Slipfits over 4" round straight pole, or 4" O.D. by 6" tall tenon. Weight: 24 lbs. E.P.A:.92 BISHOPTWIN POLE MOUNT ARM WITH CROSS RODS [VA6108, VA6157, VA6008, VA60571 Slipfits over 4" round straight pole, or 4" O.D. by 6" tall tenon. Weight: 39 lbs. EPA: 1.55 30 15116' (786 mm) I--26 314" [679 mmJ -1� 18 7/6" I [480 mm] 35 7116" [900 mm] TRADITIONAL SINGLE POLE MOUNT ARM WITH ROUNDED LOWER BAR IVA6111, VA6160, VA6011, VA60601 Slipfits over 4" round straight pole only. Weight: 25 lbs. E.P.A: 1.16 000 COOPER Lighting - cooperlighting.com 33 1/2' [852 mml 12' 13. mm1 15t mm] 54 3116' 11376 mm] BISHOP SINGLE POLE MOUNT ARM WITH CROSS ROD [VA6106, VA6155, VA6006, VA6055] Slipfits over 4" round straight pole, or 4" O.D. by 6" tall tenon. Weight: 25 lbs. E.P.A:.98 R 18 7/8" [480 mm) L LL-26 3/4" [679 mm]� 30 15116" [786 mm] TRADITIONAL SINGLE POLE MOUNTARM [VA6109, VA6158, VA6009, VA60581 Slipfits over 4" round straight pole, or 4" O.D. by 6" tall tenon. Weight: 20 lbs. E.P.A:.86 35 718" [911 mmJ L-26 3/4" [679 1—^30 15/16" [786 mm] --1 TRADITIONAL SINGLE POLE MOUNT ARM WITH 45° UPPER BAR [VA6112, VA6161, VA6012, VA6061] Slipfits over4" round straight pole, or 4" O.D. by 6" tall tenon. Weight: 28 lbs. EPA: 1.38 Itatmml 161 2' m1 11t7s mml BISHOPTWIN POLE MOUNT ARM [VA6107, VA6156, VA6007, VA6056] Slipfits over 4" round straight pole, or 4" O.D. by 6" tall tenon. Weight: 37 lbs. ERA: 1.43 35 7/8" [911 mm] LL-26 3/4" [679 mm], 30 15116" [786 mm] TRADITIONAL SINGLE POLE MOUNT ARM WITH ROUNDED UPPER BAR [VA6110, VA6159, VA6010, VA60591 Slipfits over 4" round straight pole, or 4" O.D. by 6" tall tenon. Weight: 28 lbs. ERA: 1.4 3015/16" [786 mml- 1--26314" [679 mm]-1 18 718" (480 mml 35 7116" [900 mm] TRADITIONAL SINGLE POLE MOUNT ARM WITH 45' LOWER BAR [VA6113, VA6162, VA6013, VA60621 Slipfits over 4" round straight pole only. Weight: 25 lbs. EPA: 1.14 Consult your representative for additional options and finishes. EPIC COLLECTION MEDIUM AND LARGE ARM SPECIFICATIONS AVU070422 EPIC ARMS ARMS SPECIFICAITONS !CON'T I 35 7/16 " [900 mm] L26 314" [679 mm] -57" [1448 mml TRADITIONAL SINGLE POLE MOUNT ARM WITH 45° UPPER STRAP [VA6114, VA6163, VA6014, VA60631 Slipfits over 4" round straight pole, or 4" O.D. by 6" tall tenon. Weight: 24 lbs. E.P.A: 1.17 IB J/9' Ilex mm1 S3 t/2' 03S9 mml� I 51'hN8 mm1 ---��1 TRADITIONALTWIN POLE MOUNTARM [VA6116, VA6165, VA6016, VA60651 Slipfits over 4" round straight pole, or 4" O.D. by 6" tall tenon. Weight: 30 lbs. E.P.A: 1.44 s1 '[13 mml n]59mm!� 35 )It8 ' mml_r.ff-7 I 26l//' I6J9 mm] J 53 1 1 I1359 mm A I 51' II«e mm]__..�1 TRADITIONAL TWIN POLE MOUNT ARM WITH 45° UPPER BARS [VA6119, VA6168, VA6019, VA60681 Slipfits over 4" round straight pole, or 4" O.D. by 6" tall tenon. Weight: 43 lbs. E.P.A: 2.24 5/8" [777 Radius 12' 1304 mm1 [51 mm] 51 2 [1306 BISHOP WALL MOUNT ARM WITH CROSS ROD [VA6102, VA6151, VA6002, VA6051 ] Mounts to wall with four (4) stainless steel lag bolts (provided by other). Weight: 17 lbs. TRADITIONAL TWIN POLE MOUNT ARM WITH 45° LOWER BARS [VA6120, VA6169, VA6020, VA60691 Slipfits over 4" round straight pole only. Weight: 40 lbs. E.P.A: 2.0 10 1 /III Q'.q-''� 1 [267 mml W [2c L_ L-28 1/2" [723 mmJ TRADITIONAL WALL MOUNT ARM [VA6103, VA6152, VA6003, VA60521 Mounts to wall with four (4) stainless steel lag bolts (provided by other). WEIGHT: 17 LBS. 5)' 119ee mml 26 r314 I 112' I�159 mml� 190o mml I9 )/9' 1999 mm1 I e2l' I1359 mm�D9 mm1 TRADITIONAL TWIN POLE MOUNT ARM WITH ROUNDED UPPER BARS [VA6117, VA6166, VA6017, VA60661 Slipfits over 4" round straight pole, or 4" O.D. by 6" tall tenon. Weight: 43 lbs. E.P.A: 2.28 TRADITIONAL TWIN POLE MOUNT ARM WITH 45' UPPER STRAPS [VA6121, VA6170, VA6021, VA60701 Slipfits over 4" round straight pole, or 4" O.D. by 6" tall tenon. Weight: 37 lbs. E.P.A: 1.81 35 [9 TRADITIONALTWIN POLE MOUNT ARM WITH ROUNDED LOWER BARS [VA6118, VA6167, VA6018, VA6067] Slipfits over 4" round straight pole only. Weight: 40 lbs. E.P.A: 2.04 BISHOP WALL MOUNT ARM [VA6101, VA6150, VA6001, VA60501 Mounts to wall with four (4) stainless steel lag bolts (provided by other). Weight: 16 lbs. 11 00 mmJ UU6--- _- 8 3/8' IL [�mml t1 a/a• (298mm) 8 3/8" [211mmJ-1 L26 112' [723 mmJ TRADITIONAL WALL MOUNT ARM WITH 45° STRAP [VA6104, VA6153, VA6004, VA6053] Mounts to wall with four (4) stainless steel lag bolts (provided by other). Weight: 18 lbs. MAST ARM ADAPTER [VA6122, VA6171, VA6022, VA6071 ] Secures fixture to nominal 2" pipe (2 3/8" horizontal O.D.) Weight: 4 lbs. WOOL Lighting INVUE • Customer First Center • 1121 Highway 74 South • Peachtree City, GA 30269 • TEL 770.486.4800 • FAX 770.486.4801 AVU070422 DESCRIPTION Sanibel 301 is a small, line voltage dimmable LED and halogen MR16 luminaire with integral 12V step-down transformer. It features a fully adjustable side swivel stem and built-in adjustable shroud to control glare. Side swivel provides 340e tilt and 360' rotation. Various lenses, louvers and color or dichroic filters can be combined - up to three at once - to create multiple lighting effects. SPECIFICATION FEATURES A ... Material Hood and mounting stem are precision -machined from corrosion -resistant 6061-T6 aluminum billet. Housing is spun from corrosion -resistant silicone aluminum alloy. B ... Finish Fixtures are double protected by an ROHS compliant chemical film undercoating and polyester powdercoat paint finish, surpassing the rigorous demands of the outdoor environment. A variety of standard colors are available. C ... Hood Adjustable hood provides glare control and is removable for easy relamping. Hood accepts up to three internal accessories at once (lenses, louvers, filters) to achieve multiple lighting effects. Flush lens prevents water and mineral stains from collecting on the lens, even in the straight -up position. D6mml 7-3/8. MIN. 1187mml 9-1/2' MAX. 1241mm1 1-3/4" 144mm1 _—_.-J ------ 3-1/2" ---1 189mm1 Sanibel 301 D ... Gasket Housing and hood are sealed with a high temperature silicone o-ring gasket to prevent water intrusion. E ... Lens Tempered glass lens, factory sealed with high temperature adhesive to prevent water intrusion and breakage due to thermal shock. F ... Mounting Stem Adjustable side -mounted swivel stem provides 340e tilt and 360° rotation for easy aiming. Equipped with standard 1/2" NPS threaded male fitting. Stainless steel aim -locking mechanisms are standard. G ... Hardware Stainless steel hardware is standard to provide maximum corrosion -resistance. H ... Socket Ceramic socket with 250° C Teflon® coated lead wires and GU5.3 bi-pin base. 1 ... Electrical Integral 50 VA class "H" 120/12V, 220/12V, 230/12V, 240/12V or 277/12V step-down dimmable core & coil transformer is standard. J ... Lamp Halogen lamp not included. Available from Lumiere as an accessory - see reverse side of this page. LED modules are included and are available in four color temperatures (2700, 3000, 4000, and 5700) and three distributions (spot, narrow, and flood). Both color temperature and distribution must be specified when ordering - see reverse side for details and catalog logic. K ... Labels & Approvals UL and cUL listed, standard wet label. Manufactured to ISO 9001-2000 Quality Systems Standard. IBEW union made. L ... Warranty Lumiere warrants its fixtures against defects in materials & workmanship for three (3) years. Auxiliary equipment such as transformers, ballasts and lamps carry the original manufacturer's warranty. LUMIERE® SANIBEL 301 10W LED 6W LED 50W (max.) MR16 Halogen Line Voltage Accent/Flood C� Lighting Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. ' ADL032459 www.ctwperlighting.com Consult your representative for additional options and finishes. 12/09/2011 6:17:43 PM SANIBEL 301 ORDERING INFORMATION Sample Number: 301-10LED3012-120/12-BK-F70 =LED or MR16 Sanibel Accent Fixture w/Adjustable Shroud and Integral Transformer SOMR16: 50W Max Halogen MR16, GU5.3 Base 6LED2712- 6W 2700K, 12 Degree Spot, GU5.3 Base 6LED2721= 6W 2700K, 21 Degree Narrow, GU5.3 Base 6LED2741:6W 2700K, 41 Degree Wide, GU5.3 Base 6LED3012: 6W 300OK, 12 Degree Spot, GU5.3 Base 6LED3021: 6W 3000K, 21 Degree Narrow, GU5.3 Base 6LED3041= 6W 3000K, 41 Degree Wide, GU5.3 Base 6LED4012- 6W 4000K,12 Degree Spot, GU5.3 Base 6LED4021- 6W 4000K, 21 Degree Narrow, Gu5.3 Base 6LED4041: 6W 4000K, 41 Degree Wide, GU5.3 Base 6LED5712: 6W 5700K, 12 Degree Spot, GU6.3 Base 6LED5721= 6W 5700K, 21 Degree Narrow, GU5.3 Base 6LED5741: 6W 5700K, 41 Degree Wide, GU5.3 Base 10LED2712: 1 OW 2700K, 12 Degree Spot, GU5.3 Base 1 OLED2721- 10W 2700K, 21 Degree Narrow, GU5.3 Base 10LED2741=10W 2700K, 41 Degree Wide, GU5.3 Base t OLED3012=10W 3000K, 12 Degree Spot, GU5.3 Base IOLED3021=10W 3000K, 21 Degree Narrow, GU5.3 Base 1 OLED3041=10W 3000K, 41 Degree Wide, GU5.3 Base 10LED4012=10W 4000K, 12 Degree Spot, GU5.3 Base I OLED4021=10W 4000K, 21 Degree Narrow, GU5.3 Base 1 OLED4041=10W 4000K. 41 Degree Wide, GU5.3 Base 1 OLED5712=10W 5700K 12 Degree Spot, GU5.3 Base I OLED5721=10W 5700K, 21 Degree Narrow, GU5.3 Base 1 OLED5741=10W 5700K, 41 Degree Wide, GU5.3 Base 20/12=120V to 12V Integral Transformer 20/12=220V to 12V Integral Transformer 30/12° 230V to 12V Integral Transformer 40112: 240V to 12V Integral Transformer 77112: 277V to 12V Integral Transformer .Peach Dichroic Filter, 2.00" Dia .Green Dichroic Filter, 2.00" Dia .Yellow Dichroic Fiker, 2.00" Dia Dark Blue Dichroic Filter, 2.00" Dla Neutral Density Dichroic Filter, 2.00" Dia Red Color Filter, 2.00" Dia Green Color Filter, 2.W' Dia Mercury Vapor Color Filter, 2.00" Dia Finish LSL: Linear Spread Lens (elongate standard beam spread), 2.00" Dia Painted DIF= Diffused Lens (provide even illumination), BK: Black 2.00" Dia BZ= Bronze Optical Louver CS' City Silver LVR: Hex Cell Louver (reduce glare), 2.00" Dia VE' Verde Lamp. White EZX= 20W MR16 GU5.3 Bi-Pin Very Narrow Ili: spot BAB= 20W MR 16 GU5.3 Bi-Pin Flood FRA: 35W MR16 GU5.3 BFPm Spot EXT: 5OW MR16 GUS3 BI-Pin Narrow Spot EXN=50W MR16 GU5.3 Bi-Pin Flood Notes: Lamp not included in MR16 version. • Includes 12V integral transformer. • See ACCESSORIES & TECHNICAL DATA section of the Lumiere catalog for Mounting Accessories. + Consult your Cooper Lighting representative for additional options and finishes. F72=Amber Dichroic Fiker, 2.00" Dia F74=Medium Blue Dichroic Filter, 2.00" Dia F76=Red Dichroic Filter, 2.00" Die F78: Light Blue Dichroic Filter, 2.00" Dia F80- Magenta Dichroic Filter, 2.00" Dia F33: Blue Color Filter, 2.00" Dls Fast Yellow Color Filter, 2.00" Dia OSL= Overall Spread Lens (increase beam spread), 2.00" Dia ESX: 20W MR 16 GU5.3 Bi-Pin Narrow Spot FRB= 35W MR16 GU5.3 Bi-Pln Narrow Spot FNNV: 35W MR 16 GU5.3 Bi-Pin Flood EXZ= 5OW MR 16 GUS3 Bi-Pin Narrow Flood FNV=SOW MR16 GU5.3 Bi-Pin Very Wide Flood r COOPER Lighting Specifications and Dimensions subject to change without notice. ADLO32459 www.cooperlighting.com Lumiere • Customer First Center • 1121 Highway 74 South • Peachtree City, GA 30269 • TEL 770.486.4800 • FAX 770.486.4801 12/09/2011 6:17:43 PM PHOTOMETRIC DATA Sanibel301 Cone of Light Lamp=50MR16/NSP Distance to Initial Nadir (EXT) Illuminated Plane Footcandles CBCP=11,000 6'0" 2'0" 1 12550 Lamp Wattage Multiplier 20W x 0.32 Sanibel301 Cone of Light Lamp=50MR16/FL Distance to Initial Nadir (EXN) Illuminated Plane Footcandles, CBCP=2000 ,ten Lamp Wattage Multiplier 20W x 0.30 35W x 0.57 NOTES AND FORMULAS Sanibel301 Cone of Light Beam Lamp=50MR16/NFL Distance to Initial Nadir Diameter (EXZ) Illuminated Plane Footcandles 4V CBCP=3200 15,01, 13 3'0" 1010" \ 29 2'0" 8'0" 45 _.. 81 1 0" 4'0" 181 0'6" 2'0" 725 Lamp Wattage Multiplier 42W x 0.72 Sanibel301 Cone of Light Beam Lamp=50MR16/WFL Distance to Initial Nadir Diameter (FNV) Illuminated Plane Footcandles rRra_t,3nn Beam diameter is to 501/6 of maximum footcandles, rounded to the nearest half -foot. Footcandle values are initial. Apply appropriate light loss factors where necessary. Beam Diameter 5'0" Beam Diameter WOO& Lighting Specifications and Dimensions subiect to change without notice. ADL032459 www.cooperlighting.com Lumiere • Customer First Center • 1121 Highway 74 South • Peachtree City, GA 30269 • TEL 770.486.4800 • FAX 770.486.4801 12/09/2011 6:17:43 PM ♦� Ad§ TR U D E L L �. Consulting Engineers Technology Park Lot 3 *41 Stormwater Design Brief 1. Project Description Technology Park Campus, LLC (Applicant) proposes the construction of a 3-story office building on Lot 3 of the Technology Park campus on Community Drive. The master plan for the entire campus provided stormwater treatment facilities for this lot on the adjacent Lot 2. Originally permitted under # 1-1458, the combined Lot 2 and 3 stormwater treatment system listed the receiving water as Potash Brook, an impaired waterway. The permit expired on March 31, 2006 but received Title III coverage on May 4, 2007. Based on conversations with the Agency of Natural Resources, the Lot 3 project will not require a new permit as the impervious surfaces were previously permitted under 1-1458. To meet ANR's requirements, the Engineering Feasibility Analysis (EFA) procedure was followed, which focuses compliance on three standards, Water Quality, Recharge, and Channel Protection. The stormwater treatment system described in this narrative addresses the impervious surfaces for the proposed project, consisting of 2.09 acres of new impervious surface, which drains to one of the two existing stormwater wetlands on the Lot 2 parcel. As the system was designed prior to the adoption of the 2002 Vermont Stormwater Management Manual (VSMM), it has been analyzed to determine its conformance to the applicable ANR treatment criteria. 2. Receiving Waters Stormwater runoff from this site currently discharges to Potash Brook, located approximately 1,100 feet to the east of the Lot 3. 3. Existing Conditions Lot 3 of Technology Park currently consists of an access drive from Community Drive to Lot 2. A catch basin system is installed in the driveway, conveying runoff to an existing stormwater system. The soils consist of Vergennes Clay, which is characterized as Hydrologic Soil Group (HSG) D. Slopes on the parcel are relatively flat, below 5%. Total impervious cover on Lot 3 is approximately 0.22 acres. 4. Existing Stormwater System Civil Engineering Land Surveying Landscape Architecture Environmental Services Page 2 ♦� Stormwater Narrative - Tech Park Lot 3 —tCe TPU DELL '0*1' Consllltlzlg EYlg iieei-s Stormwater runoff from Lot 3 drains to a catch basin system that leads to Wetland 2, located next to Kimball Avenue. This structure serves as a water quality treatment practice. Treated runoff from the constructed wetland discharges into a natural wetland. The natural wetland is bordered on the west side by an existing berm. A culvert with a concrete inlet structure was installed in this berm to control the rate of runoff from the Project site to meet older stormwater regulations. 5. Proposed Stormwater System The proposed stormwater treatment system uses Wetland 2 and modifies it to meet the 2002 VSMM standard for water quality and channel protection. A summary of the site's compliance with the applicable State and local regulations follows. Water Quality Treatment Standard Water quality treatment for the site is accomplished through Wetland 2. It has been designed with a forebay and permanent pool, and release treated stormwater through a controlled outlet structure. Two wetlands are located on Lot 2; Wetland 1 is located just to the northwest of the Lot 2 building, and Wetland 2 is located on the north side of the parking lot, adjacent to Kimball Avenue. Wetland 1 provides treatment for the Lot 2 parking lot and building, while Wetland 2 provides treatment for the existing access drive on Lot 3 as well as the proposed parking lot and building. As all new impervious drains to Wetland 2, modifications are proposed for this structure. Orifice sizing has been reduced, and the overflow grate elevation lowered to pass larger storms safely. Refer to Appendix A for HydroCAD modeling supporting site performance for the 0.9-inch storm event. Groundwater Recharge Treatment Standard Lot 3 consists of soils in the HSG D category, which has negligible recharge capability. The VSMM recognizes this, and allows for this criterion to be waived for sites with HSG D soils. Channel Protection Criterion Treated runoff from Wetland 2 discharges to a wetland on Lot 1 of Technology Park. A berm with a culvert contains and controls the release rate of runoff. The outlet structure of the culvert has been modified to provide a 12-hour Civil Engineering Land Surveying Landscape Architecture Environmental Services Page 3 L T R D Stormwater Narrative - Tech Park Lot 3 —td§ lt E L L Consulting Engineers *1� center -of -mass detention time during a 1-year storm event, meeting the Channel Protection criterion. Refer to Appendix B for HydroCAD modeling demonstrating compliance with this criterion. Overbank Flood Protection (Qr) 10) Criterion The Qp10 criterion is not applicable to the EFA analysis and was not analyzed as part of this analysis. However, the previous design included a large amount of storage (approximately 290,000 cubic feet) with an outlet structure to control the rate of release from both Lot 2 and Lot 3. The site currently meets this criterion and will continue to do so after this project is completed Extreme Flood Protection (Qp100) Criterion The Qp100 criterion is not applicable to the EFA analysis and was not analyzed as part of this analysis. However, the previous design included a large amount of storage (approximately 290,000 cubic feet) with an outlet structure to control the rate of release from both Lot 2 and Lot 3. 6. Conclusions Table 1 below summarizes each of the Stormwater criteria in the EFA procedure and how the site complies with each one: Table 1: Stormwater Criteria Su Water Quality 3,722cu. ft. + 24-hr 3,738 cu. ft + extended detention 23.2 hr ED Recharge Waive_ d (HSG D soils N/A Channel Protection 12-hr detention time 12.11 hr Civil Engineering Land Surveying Landscape Architectu)-c Environmental Services W2 CDA2 existing wetland 2 Subca Reach and Link proposed building/parking 14-088 - post Lot 3 2014 1028 Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Printed 10/28/2014 HydroCADO 10.00-12 s/n 02145 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 2 Area Listing (selected nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 1.699 80.0 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D (DA2) 0.399 98.0 existing impervious, HSG D (DA2) 1.910 98.0 proposed impervious, HSG D (DA2) 4.008 90.4 TOTAL AREA 14-088 - post Lot 3 2014 1028 Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Printed 10/28/2014 HydroCADO 10.00-12 s/n 02145 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Soil Listing (selected nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.000 HSG B 0.000 HSG C 4.008 HSG D DA2 0.000 Other 4.008 TOTAL AREA 14-088 - post Lot 3 2014 1028 Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Printed 10/28/2014 HydroCADTD 10.00-12 s/n 02145 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Ground Covers (selected nodes) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.699 0.000 1.699 >75% Grass cover, Good DA2 0.000 0.000 0.000 0,399 0.000 0.399 existing impervious DA2 0.000 0.000 0.000 1.910 0.000 1.910 proposed impervious DA2 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.008 0.000 4.008 TOTAL AREA 14-088 - post Lot 3 2014 1028 Type II 24-hr 1-year Rain fall=2. 10" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Printed 10/28/2014 HydroCADO 10.00-12 s/n 02145 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 5 Time span=0.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7201 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment DA2: proposed building/parking Runoff Area=4.008 ac 57.61% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.21" Flow Length=1,046' Tc=24.6 min CN=90.4 Runoff=4.77 cfs 0.403 of Pond W2: existing wetland 2 Peak Elev=335.90' Storage=12,825 cf Inflow=4.77 cfs 0.403 of Outflow=0.99 cfs 0.370 of Total Runoff Area = 4.008 ac Runoff Volume = 0.403 at Average Runoff Depth = 1.21" 42.39% Pervious = 1.699 ac 57.61% Impervious = 2.309 ac 14-088 - post Lot 3 2014 1028 Type II 24-hr 1-year Rain fall=2. 10" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Printed 10/28/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 02145 @ 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment DA2: proposed building/parking Runoff = 4.77 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.403 of, Depth= 1.21" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 1-year Rainfall=2.10" Area (ac) CN Description 1.699 80.0 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG D * 0.399 98.0 existing impervious, HSG D * 1.910 98.0 proposed impervious, HSG D 4.008 90.4 Weighted Average 1.699 42.39% Pervious Area 2.309 57.61% Impervious Area Tc (min) Length (feet) Slope (ft/ft) Velocity Capacity (ft/sec) (cfs) Description 15.2 100 0.0100 0.11 Sheet Flow, 0 - 100' Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.30'' 6.7 280 0.0100 0.70 Shallow Concentrated Flow, 100' to road Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 1.7 340 0.0264 3.30 Shallow Concentrated Flow, road to CB Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 1.0 326 0.01 1 1 5.55 6.81 Pipe Channel, CB network to wetland 15.0" Round Area= 1.2 sf Perim= 3.9' r= 0.31' 24.6 1,046 Total Summary for Pond W2: existing wetland 2 Inflow Area = 4.008 ac, 57.61% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.21'' for 1-year event Inflow = 4.77 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.403 of Outflow = 0.99 cfs @ 12.74 hrs, Volume= 0.370 of, Atten= 79%, Lag= 34.3 min Primary = 0.99 cfs @ 12.74 hrs, Volume= 0.370 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 334.00' Surf.Area= 6,406 sf Storage= 3,738 cf Peak Elev= 335.90' @ 12.74 hrs Surf.Area= 9,669 sf Storage= 12,825 cf (9,087 cf above start) Flood Elev= 339.00' Surf.Area= 13,683 sf Storage= 30,642 cf (26,904 cf above start) Plug -Flow detention time= 1,064.3 min calculated for 0.285 of (71 % of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 727.0 min ( 1,563.4 - 836.4) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description # 1 332.00' 530 cf forebay (Irregular) Listed below (Recalc) #2 330.00' 3,208 cf extended detention (Irregular) Listed below (Recalc) #3 334.00' 26,904 cf dry storage (Irregular) Listed below (Recalc) 30,642 cf Total Available Storage Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq-ft) 332.00 150 50.0 0 0 150 334.00 400 77.0 530 530 451 14-088 - post Lot 3 2014 1028 Type 11 24-hr 1-year Rainfall=2. 10" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Printed 10/28/2014 HydroCADOO 10.00-12 s/n 02145 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 7 Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq-ft) 330.00 26 30.0 0 0 26 332.00 425 99.0 371 371 746 334.00 2,750 350.0 2,837 3,208 9,726 Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq-ft) 334.00 3,256 489.0 0 0 3,256 336.00 6,732 524.0 9,780 9,780 6,254 338.00 10,533 560.0 17,124 26,904 9,543 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices # 1 Primary 334.16' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 122.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 334,16' / 334.05' S= 0.0009 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 334.00' 1.2" Vert. control orifice C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 335.50' 24.0" Vert. overflow grate C= 0.600 Primary OutFlow Max=0.99 cfs Cd 12.74 hrs HW=335.90' (Free Discharge) L1=Culvert (Passes 0.99 cfs of 2.51 cfs potential flow) 2=control orifice (Orifice Controls 0.05 cfs @ 6.34 fps) t 3=overflow grate (Orifice Controls 0.94 cfs (§? 2.14 fps) A existing wetly proposed building/parking �Subca� IReachl Aon Link J 14-088 - post lot 3 2014 1028 Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Printed 10/28/2014 HydroCADO 10.00-12 s/n 02145 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC _ _ Page 2 Area Listing (selected nodes) Area CN Description (acres) (subcatchment-numbers) 4.008 95.6 mod CN (2 MCN) 4.008 95.6 TOTAL AREA 14-088 - post Lot 3 2014 1028 Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Printed 10/28/2014 HydroCADO 10.00-12 s/n 02145 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 3 Soil Listing (selected nodes) Area Soil Subcatchment (acres) Group Numbers 0.000 HSG A 0.000 HSG B 0.000 HSG C 0.000 HSG D 4.008 Other 2 MCN 4.008 TOTAL AREA 14-088 - post Lot 3 2014 1028 Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Printed 10/28/2014 HydroCAD@ 10.00-12 s/n 02145 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Ground Covers (selected nodes) HSG-A HSG-B HSG-C HSG-D Other Total Ground Subcatchment (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) (acres) Cover Numbers 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.008 4.008 mod CN 2 MCN 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 4.008 4.008 TOTAL AREA 14-088 - post Lot 3 2014 1028 Type 11 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Printed 10/28/2014 HydroCADO 10.00-12 s/n 02145 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Time span=0.00-72.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 7201 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method - Pond routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 2 MCN: proposed building/parking Runoff Area=4.008 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.51" Flow Length=1,046' Tc=24.6 min CN=95.6 Runoff=2.03 cfs 0.172 of Pond W2: existing wetland 2 Peak Elev=335.34' Storage=9,503 cf Inflow=2.03 cfs 0.172 of Outflow=0.04 cfs 0.150 of Total Runoff Area = 4.008 ac Runoff Volume = 0.172 at Average Runoff Depth = 0.51" 100.007o Pervious = 4.008 ac 0.00% Impervious = 0.000 ac 14-088 - post Lot 3 2014 1028 Type/1 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Printed 10/28/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 02145 @ 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 6 Summary for Subcatchment 2 MCN: proposed building/parking Runoff = 2.03 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.172 at, Depth= 0.51'' Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Area (ac) CN Description * 4.008 95.6 mod CN 4.008 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 15.2 100 0.0100 0.11 Sheet Flow, 0 - 100' Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.30" 6.7 280 0.0100 0.70 Shallow Concentrated Flow, 100' to road Short Grass Pasture Kv= 7.0 fps 1.7 340 0.0264 3.30 Shallow Concentrated Flow, road to CB Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 1.0 326 0.0111 5.55 6.81 Pipe Channel, CB network to wetland 15.0" Round Area= 1.2 sf Perim= 3.9' r= 0.31' n= 0.013 24.6 1,046 Total Summary for Pond W2: existing wetland 2 Inflow Area = 4.008 ac, 0.00% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 0.51" for WQv event Inflow = 2.03 cfs @ 12.17 hrs, Volume= 0.172 of Outflow = 0.04 cfs @ 20.37 hrs, Volume= 0.150 of, Atten= 98%, Lag= 492.1 min Primary = 0.04 cfs @ 20.37 hrs, Volume= 0.150 of Routing by Dyn-Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-72.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Starting Elev= 334.00' Surf.Area= 6,406 sf Storage= 3,738 cf Peak Elev= 335.34' @ 20.37 hrs Surf.Area= 8,596 sf Storage= 9,503 cf (5,765 cf above start) Flood Elev= 339.00' Surf.Area= 13,683 sf Storage= 30,642 cf (26,904 cf above start) Plug -Flow detention time= 2,476.4 min calculated for 0.064 of (37% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 1,394.1 min (2,231.0 - 836.9 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 332.00' 530 cf forebay (Irregular) Listed below (Recalc) #2 330.00' 3,208 cf extended detention (Irregular) Listed below (Recalc) #3 334.00' 26,904 cf dry storage (Irregular) Listed below (Recalc) 30,642 cf Total Available Storage Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq-ft) 332.00 150 50.0 0 0 150 334.00 400 77.0 530 530 451 Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq-ft) 330.00 26 30.0 0 0 26 332.00 425 99.0 371 371 746 334.00 2,750 350.0 2,837 3,208 9,726 14-088 - post Lot 3 2014 1028 Type II 24-hr WQv Rainfall=0.90" Prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers Printed 10/28/2014 HydroCAD® 10.00-12 s/n 02145 © 2014 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paae 7 Elevation Surf.Area Perim. Inc.Store Cum.Store Wet.Area (feet) (sq-ft) (feet) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) (sq-ft) 334.00 3,256 489.0 0 0 3,256 336.00 6,732 524.0 9,780 9,780 6,254 338.00 10,533 560.0 17,124 26,904 9,543 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices # 1 Primary 334.16' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 122.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 334.16' / 334.05' S= 0.0009 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #2 Device 1 334.00' 1.2" Vert. control orifice C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 335.50' 24.0" Vert. overflow grate C= 0.600 Primary OutFlow Max=0.04 cfs Q 20.37 hrs HW=335.34' (Free Discharge) tl =Culvert (Passes 0.04 cfs of 1.77 cfs potential flow) �2=control orifice (Orifice Controls 0.04 cfs ® 5.23 fps) 3=overflow grate ( Controls 0.00 cfs)