The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0400 Swift StreetENGINEERING VENTURES PC TRANSMITTAL 208 Flynn Avenue, Suite 2A, Burlington, VT 05401 Tel: 802-863-6225 Fax: 802-863-6306 85 Mechanic Street, Suite B2-2, Lebanon, NH 03766 Tel: 603-442-9333 Fax: 603-442-9331 Date: 8/20/15 To: Ray Belair, Administrative Officer, City of South Burlington From: Mark DeCrescente, P.E. Re: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Zoning Permit Application Enclosed: Three (3) Sets of Full-size Plans, last revised 1/22/15 Notes: Ray, Enclosed with this package are the three (3) revised full-size plan sets that are required for the Zoning Permit Application. Thank you for your assistance with this project and please let me know if there is anything else that you require. south 1 ' : 0 - 1 W PLANNING & ZONING February 19, 2015 Re: #SP-15-02 — 400 Swift Street Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sinc&ely, Raymond J. Bel Ir Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7010 0290 0000 2215 6522 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com south.,,. PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP-/ �, - 6 & (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW El Administrative ElDevelopment Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1.OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Latter-day Saints, a Utah corporation sole, 273 LDS Lane, South Royalton, VT 05068 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Latter-day Saints, a Utah corporation sole, 273 LDS Lane, South Royalton, VT 05068 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Jospeh Mender, phone 802-763-8198, FAX 802-763-8198 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: MenderJR@Idschurch.org 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 400 Swift Street, South Burlington Vermont 05403 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 1700-00400 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Storm water improvements and landscape improvements. b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Place of Worship, Church of Ladder -day Saints. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): No new use d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): existing building foot print = 16,310 sq ft +/-, Existing shed = 170 sq ft +/ - Total = 16,480 sq ft +/ e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): single story structure, no change. f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): N/A g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 1 to 5, no change h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 C 8. LOT COVERAGE a. Building: Total Parcel Size: 126,831 Existing 13 % / Proposed N/A % / Sq. Ft. 16,480 sq. ft. N/A sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 50 % / 63,420 sq. ft. Proposed N/A % / N/A sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing 8.5 % / 780 sq. ft. Proposed N/A % / N/A sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 0.4 ac. * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ N/A b. Landscaping: $ 5,000 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): $44,0000 storm water improvements 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): N/A no change 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: N/A no change 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Summer 2015, June 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application' accordance with the city's fee schedule. $28 Q .00 C Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT f� SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAM Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board 11 Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 208 Flynn Avenue, Suite 2A, Burlington, VT 05401 Tel: 802-863-6225 Fax: 802-863-6306 85 Mechanic Street, Suite B2-2, Lebanon, NH 03766 Tel: 603-442-9333 Fax: 603-442-9331 Comments from South Burlington Staff -Tom DiPietro - with EV responses (SB comments in italics and EV responses in bold) I reviewed the "UVM Medical Center Dialysis South Burlington" site plan prepared by Engineering Ventures and Joseph Architects, dated 311113 with the note "Issued for Construction January 15, 2015". 1 would like to offer the following comments: 1. The proposed project is located in the Potash Brook watershed. This watershed is listed as stormwater impaired by the State of Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC). Correct 2. The project proposes to create an additional —7,300 square feet of impervious area on the parcel. This results in greater than 1 total acre of impervious area on the parcel. Therefore, it appears that the project will require a stormwater permit from the Vermont DEC Stormwater Division. The applicant should acquire this permit before starting construction. Agreed, application for an Individual Permit has been submitted 3. The project proposes to disturb greater than 1 acre of impervious area. It will therefore require a construction stormwater permit from the Vermont DEC Stormwater Division. The applicant should acquire these permits before starting construction. Proposed disturbed area is below 0.9 AC (below the 9020 regulatory threshold of 1 AC). 4. The applicant should provide a drainage area map for the proposed stormwater treatment practices. Attached 5. In order to confirm compliance with section 15.13.F(3) the applicant must submit modeling for the 25 year storm event. Our assumption is that the proposed stormwater treatment practices will reduce runoff over existing conditions during this, and smaller, storm events. This would sufficiently protect downstream drainage structures. However, we'd like modeling to confirm this and so that we can add this information to our model for the Potash Brook watershed. HydroCAD report attached. Will send model to Tom. 6. The applicant should show snow storage locations on the site plan. Snow storage areas are shown on sheet C1.2. 7. The DRB should include a condition requiring the applicant to regularly maintain all stormwater treatment and conveyance infrastructure. No objection Thank you for the opportunity to comment. -Tom 4rtx ni roar {/4Y rear war nv4eo ® _ —i000-- _ 995 \ � 1 _ 1 / 1 a � t h a� Z. g } j r<4vraM } Lil- ti• ..._ _-99 ~ .�,•� �. \. I TO AREA BENG \ \ .R�.aF ALL � T�v \ a B!m a \ \ o S l �rry \. �rra4v GRAPHIC SCALE _'... 40 0 20 40 so 160 1 inch = 40 ft. for sheet size 11" x 17" r. •'�1j -- _ __ W '•^m® I I Irx I �fi —t 0 3--- T�ASSUIiD 5 C0WFW OF MUSILY IIPMMOUS SLWAM _ r I 1 f i L�Wr AR D W-WOM AREA a» - 0.i3 AQ I I I p %Il t I r tl I I i6+ r 1002 1 I I I\ a DOT \\ II W4 Fe 14 Checked By. Scale: ENGINEERING POST -DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE MD 1•= 40- VENTURES" AREA MAP FOR SITE ONLY Drawn By. Project No. 5os nwoa.<��c 5wt,—A,gt,,, o54m MD 14434 W.Wt.86IMS- W 802863,&A 89W,h,.,, St-, 5- 35K l�, NH 03I66 UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT MEDICAL Date: Drawing No. te1.3429333•11 6034R9331 .engneeMgeentures.[cm CENTER DIALYSIS - SOUTH BURLINGTON 12/30/1,4 H—Q JPOST-Impery to PRE-DEV TO POI POST -Lawn t Bio-Ret 1P rnTui Bio-Retention A a Subcat Reach on Link POST-DEV TO POI st-Bypass SWM Model Type ll 24-hr 25 YEAR Rainfall=4.00" Prepared by Engineering Ventures, PC Printed 2/12/2015 HydroCADID10.00 s/n 02106 ©2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 1 Time span=0.00-90.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 9001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1 S: PRE-DEV TO POI Runoff Area=6.800 ac 47.81 % Impervious Runoff Depth=1.20" Flow Length=1,100' Tc=17.7 min CN=68 Runoff=9.16 cfs 0.683 of Subcatchment 2S: POST-Impery to Runoff Area=0.300 ac 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.77" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.76 cfs 0.094 of Subcatchment 3S: POST -Lawn to Bio-Ret Runoff Area=0.130 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.05" Tc=5.0 min CN=39 Runoff=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Subcatchment 4S: POST to Infilt Basin Runoff Area=0.190 ac 68.42% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.96" Tc=5.0 min CN=79 Runoff=0.69 cfs 0.031 of Subcatchment 5S: Post -Bypass Runoff Area=6.180 ac 11.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.27" Flow Length=1,100' Tc=17.7 min CN=69 Runoff=8.84 cfs 0.652 of Pond 1 P: Bio-Retention Area Peak Elev=996.58' Storage=2,730 cf Inflow=1.76 cfs 0.095 of Outfiow=0.14 cfs 0.068 of Pond 2P: Infiltration Basin Peak Elev=997.56' Storage=463 cf Inflow=0.69 cfs 0.031 of Discarded=0.04 cfs 0.027 of Primary=0.22 cfs 0.004 of Outflow=0.26 cfs 0.031 of Link 6L: POST-DEV TO POI Inflow=9.06 cfs 0.725 of Primary=9.06 cfs 0.725 of SWM Model Type l/ 24-hr 25 YEAR Rainfall=4.00" Prepared by Engineering Ventures, PC Printed 2/12/2015 HydroCAD0 10.00 s/n 02106 ©2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 3 Summary for Subcatchment 1 S: PRE-DEV TO POI Runoff = 9.16 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.683 af, Depth= 1.20" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-90.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 25 YEAR Rainfall=4.00" Area (ac) CN Descriotion 0.860 98 Paved parking, HSG A (ON -SITE) 1.158 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A (ON -SITE) 4.782 69 Assumed 50% impervious/50% A -soils 6.800 68 Weighted Average 3.549 52.19% Pervious Area 3.251 47.81% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description _(min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 11.6 100 0.0200 0.14 Sheet Flow, AB Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.30" 3.8 660 0.0200 2.87 Shallow Concentrated Flow, BC Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 2.3 340 0.0150 2.49 Shallow Concentrated Flow, CD Paved Kv= 20.3 fos 17.7 1,100 Total Summary for Subcatchment 2S: POST-Impery to Bio-Ret Runoff = 1.76 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.094 af, Depth= 3.77" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-90.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 25 YEAR Rainfall=4.00" Area (ac) CN Description 0.300 98 Paved parking, HSG A 0.300 100.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 3S: POST -Lawn to Bio-Ret Runoff = 0.00 cfs @ 17.75 hrs, Volume= 0.000 af, Depth= 0.05" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-90.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24-hr 25 YEAR Rainfall=4.00" SWM Model Type 11 24-hr 25 YEAR Rainfall=4.00" Prepared by Engineering Ventures, PC Printed 2/12/2015 HydroCAD010.00 s/n 02106 ©2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Area (ac) CN Description 0.130 39 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG A 0.130 100.00% Pervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 4S: POST to Infilt Basin Runoff = 0.69 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.031 af, Depth= 1.96" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-90.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type II 24-hr 25 YEAR Rainfall=4.00" Area (ac) CN Description 0.130 98 Paved parking, HSG A 0.060 39 >75% Grass cover, Good HSG A 0.190 79 Weighted Average 0.060 31.58% Pervious Area 0.130 68.42% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (ft/sec) (cfs) 5.0 Direct Entry, Summary for Subcatchment 5S: Post -Bypass Runoff = 8.84 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.652 af, Depth= 1.27" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN, Time Span= 0.00-90.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Type 11 24-hr 25 YEAR Rainfall=4.00" Area (ac) CN Description 0.680 98 Paved parking, HSG A (ON -SITE) 0.718 39 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG A (ON -SITE) 4.782 69 Assumed 50%Impervious/50%A-soils 6.180 69 Weighted Average 5.500 89.00% Pervious Area 0.680 11.00% Impervious Area Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (min) (feet) (ft/ft) (fUsec) (cfs) 11.6 100 0.0200 0.14 Sheet Flow, AB Grass: Short n= 0.150 P2= 2.30" 3.8 660 0.0200 2.87 Shallow Concentrated Flow, BC Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 2.3 340 0.0150 2.49 Shallow Concentrated Flow, CD Paved Kv= 20.3 fps 17.7 1,100 Total SWM Model Type 11 24-hr 25 YEAR Rainfall=4.00" Prepared by Engineering Ventures, PC Printed 2/12/2015 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02106 ©2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Summary for Pond 1 P: Bio-Retention Area Inflow Area = 0.430 ac, 69.77% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 2.64" for 25 YEAR event Inflow = 1.76 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.095 of Outflow = 0.14 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 0.068 af, Atten= 92%, Lag= 29.1 min Primary = 0.14 cfs @ 12.44 hrs, Volume= 0.068 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-90.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 996.58' @ 12.44 hrs Surf.Area= 1,853 sf Storage= 2,730 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 803.4 min calculated for 0.068 of (72% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 707.7 min ( 1,456.8 - 749.1 ) Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 992.60' 3,556 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Voids Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (%) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 992.60 1,181 0.0 0 0 995.10 1,181 17.0 502 502 995.50 1,350 100.0 506 1,008 996.00 1,574 100.0 731 1,739 996.50 1,812 100.0 847 2,586 997.00 2,070 100.0 971 3,556 Device Routing Invert Outlet Devices #1 Primary 991.25' 10.0" Round Culvert L= 25.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 991.25' / 991.00' S= 0.0100 '/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.010 PVC, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.55 sf #2 Device 1 995.60' 1.0" Vert. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 #3 Device 1 996.50' 6.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Primary OutFlow Max=0.14 cfs @ 12.44 hrs HW=996.58' (Free Discharge) t- =Culvert (Passes 0.14 cfs of 5.82 cfs potential flow) 2=Orifice/Grate (Orifice Controls 0.03 cfs @ 4.66 fps) 3 Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.11 cfs @ 0.92 fps) Summary for Pond 2P: Infiltration Basin Inflow Area = 0.190 ac, 68.42% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.96" for 25 YEAR event Inflow - 0.69 cfs @ 11.96 hrs, Volume= 0.031 of Outflow - 0.26 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.031 af, Atten= 63%, Lag= 6.0 min Discarded = 0.04 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.027 of Primary - 0.22 cfs @ 12.06 hrs, Volume= 0.004 of Routing by Stor-Ind method, Time Span= 0.00-90.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs Peak Elev= 997.56' @ 12.06 hrs Surf.Area= 926 sf Storage= 463 cf Plug -Flow detention time= 75.8 min calculated for 0.031 of (100% of inflow) Center -of -Mass det. time= 75.8 min ( 906.3 - 830.6) SWM Model Type // 24-hr 25 YEAR Rainfall=4.00" Prepared by Engineering Ventures, PC Printed 2/12/2015 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02106 © 2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC • Page 6 Volume Invert Avail.Storage Storage Description #1 997.00' 1,503 cf Custom Stage Data (Prismatic) Listed below (Recalc) Elevation Surf.Area Inc.Store Cum.Store (feet) (sq-ft) (cubic -feet) (cubic -feet) 997.00 735 0 0 997.50 905 410 410 998.00 1,089 499 909 998.50 1,287 594 1,503 Device Routina Invert Outlet Devices #1 Discarded 997.00' 2.000 in/hr Exfiltration over Surface area #2 Primary 990.20' 12.0" Round Culvert L= 54.0' CPP, square edge headwall, Ke= 0.500 Inlet / Outlet Invert= 990.20' / 990.02' S= 0.0033'/' Cc= 0.900 n= 0.013 Corrugated PE, smooth interior, Flow Area= 0.79 sf #3 Device 2 997.50' 18.0" Horiz. Orifice/Grate C= 0.600 Limited to weir flow at low heads Discarded OutFiow Max=0.04 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=997.56' (Free Discharge) 1=Exfiltration (Exfiltration Controls 0.04 cfs) Primary OutFlow Max=0.21 cfs @ 12.06 hrs HW=997.56' (Free Discharge) t-Culvert (Passes 0.21 cfs of 9.02 cfs potential flow) 3=Orifice/Grate (Weir Controls 0.21 cfs @ 0.78 fps) Summary for Link 6L: POST-DEV TO POI Inflow Area = 6.800 ac, 16.32% Impervious, Inflow Depth = 1.28" for 25 YEAR event Inflow = 9.06 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.725 of Primary = 9.06 cfs @ 12.11 hrs, Volume= 0.725 af, Aften= 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Primary outflow = Inflow, Time Span= 0.00-90.00 hrs, dt= 0.01 hrs SWM Model Type l/ 24-hr 1 YEAR Rainfall=2.10" Prepared by Engineering Ventures, PC Printed 2/12/2015 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02106 ©2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 1 Time span=0.00-90.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 9001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment IS: PRE-DEV TO POI Runoff Area=6.800 ac 47.81% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.23" Flow Length=1,100' Tc=17.7 min CN=68 Runoff=1.02 cfs 0.130 of Subcatchment 2S: POST-Impery to Runoff Area=0.300 ac 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.87" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=0.91 cfs 0.047 of Subcatchment 3S: POST -Lawn to Bio-Ret Runoff Area=0.130 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.00" Tc=5.0 min CN=39 Runoff=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Subcatchment4S: POST to Infilt Basin Runoff Area=0.190 ac 68.42% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.58" Tc=5.0 min CN=79 Runoff=0.20 cfs 0.009 of Subcatchment 5S: Post -Bypass Runoff Area=6.180 ac 11.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.25" Flow Length=1,100' Tc=17.7 min CN=69 Runoff=1.13 cfs 0.131 of Pond 1 P: Bio-Retention Area Peak Elev=995.91' Storage=1,594 cf Inflow=0.91 cfs 0.047 of Outflow=0.01 cfs 0.021 of Pond 2P: Infiltration Basin Peak Elev=997.14' Storage=103 cf Inflow=0.20 cfs 0.009 of Discarded=0.04 cfs 0.009 of Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.04 cfs 0.009 of Link 6L: POST-DEV TO POI Inflow=1.13 cfs 0.151 of Primary=1.13 cfs 0.151 of SWM Model Type 1124-hr 2 YEAR Rainfall=2.30" Prepared by Engineering Ventures, PC Printed 2/12/2015 HydroCAD® 10.00 sln 02106 © 2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page2 Time span=0.00-90.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 9001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1 S: PRE-DEV TO POI Runoff Area=6.800 ac 47.81 % Impervious Runoff Depth=0.30" Flow Length=1,100' Tc=17.7 min CN=68 Runoff=1.60 cfs 0.173 of Subcatchment 2S: POST-Impery to Runoff Area=0.300 ac 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.07" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.00 cfs 0.052 of Subcatchment 3S: POST -Lawn to Bio-Ret Runoff Area=0.130 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.00" Tc=5.0 min CN=39 Runoff=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Subcatchment4S: POST to Infilt Basin Runoff Area=0.190 ac 68.42% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.71" Tc=5.0 min CN=79 Runoff=0.25 cfs 0.011 of Subcatchment 5S: Post -Bypass Runoff Area=6.180 ac 11.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.33" Flow Length=1,100' Tc=17.7 min CN=69 Runoff=1.70 cfs 0.172 of Pond 1 P: Bio-Retention Area Peak EIev=996.00' Storage=1,744 cf Inflow=1.00 cfs 0.052 of Outflow=0.02 cfs 0.025 of Pond 212: Infiltration Basin Peak EIev=997.18' Storage=139 cf Inflow=0.25 cfs 0.011 of Discarded=0.04 cfs 0.011 of Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.04 cfs 0.011 of Link 6L: POST-DEV TO POI Inflow=1.71 cfs 0.197 of Primary=1.71 cfs 0.197 of SWM Model Type 11 24-hr 10 YEAR Rainfall=3.20" Prepared by Engineering Ventures, PC Printed 2/12/2015 HydroCAD& 10.00 s/n 02106 ©2013_HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Paoe 3 Time span=0.00-90.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 9001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: PRE-DEV TO POI Runoff Area=6.800 ac 47.81 % Impervious Runoff Depth=0.73" Flow Length=1,100' Tc=17.7 min CN=68 Runoff=5.17 cfs 0.415 of Subcatchment 2S: POST-Impery to Runoff Area=0.300 ac 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.97" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.40 cfs 0.074 of Subcatchment 3S: POST -Lawn to Bio-Ret Runoff Area=0.130 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.00" Tc=5.0 min CN=39 Runoff=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Subcatchment4S: POST to Infilt Basin Runoff Area=0.190 ac 68.42% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.34" Tc=5.0 min CN=79 Runoff=0.47 cfs 0.021 of Subcatchment 5S: Post -Bypass Runoff Area=6.180 ac 11.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.78" Flow Length=1,100' Tc=17.7 min CN=69 Runoff=5.10 cfs 0.401 of Pond 1P: Bio-Retention Area Peak Elev=996.44' Storage=2,477 cf Inflow=1.40 cfs 0.074 of Outflow=0.02 cfs 0.048 of Pond 2P: Infiltration Basin Peak Elev=997.43' Storage=350 cf Inflow=0.47 cfs 0.021 of Discarded=0.04 cfs 0.021 of Primary=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Outflow=0.04 cfs 0.021 of Link 6L: POST-DEV TO POI Inflow=5.12 cfs 0.449 of Primary=5.12 cfs 0.449 of SWM Model Type 1124-hr 25 YEAR Rainfall=4.00" Prepared by Engineering Ventures, PC Printed 2/12/2015 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02106 © 2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 4 Time span=0.00-90.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 9001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: PRE-DEV TO POI Runoff Area=6.800 ac 47.81% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.20" Flow Length=1,100' Tc=17.7 min CN=68 Runoff=9.16 cfs 0.683 of Subcatchment 2S: POST-Impery to Runoff Area=0.300 ac 100.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=3.77" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=1.76 cfs 0.094 of Subcatchment 3S: POST -Lawn to Bio-Ret Runoff Area=0.130 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.05" Tc=5.0 min CN=39 Runoff=0.00 cfs 0.000 of Subcatchment 4S: POST to Infilt Basin Runoff Area=0.190 ac 68.42% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.96" Tc=5.0 min CN=79 Runoff=0.69 cfs 0.031 of Subcatchment 5S: Post -Bypass Runoff Area=6.180 ac 11.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=1.27" Flow Length=1,100' Tc=17.7 min CN=69 Runoff=8.84 cfs 0.652 of Pond 1 P: Bio-Retention Area Peak Elev=996.58' Storage=2,730 cf Inflow=1.76 cfs 0.095 of Outflow=0.14 cfs 0.066 of Pond 2P: Infiltration Basin Peak Elev=997.56' Storage=463 cf Inflow=0.69 cfs 0.031 of Discarded=0.04 cfs 0.027 of Primary=0.22 cfs 0.004 of Outflow=0.26 cfs 0.031 of Link 6L: POST-DEV TO POI Inflow=9.06 cfs 0.725 of Primary=9.06 cfs 0.725 of SWM Model Type // 24-hr 100 YEAR Rainfall=5.20" Prepared by Engineering Ventures, PC Printed 2/12/2015 HydroCAD® 10.00 s/n 02106 C 2013 HydroCAD Software Solutions LLC Page 5 Time span=0.00-90.00 hrs, dt=0.01 hrs, 9001 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Weighted-CN Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 1S: PRE-DEV TO POI Runoff Area=6.800 ac 47.81% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.02" Flow Length=1,100' Tc=17.7 min CN=68 Runoff=16.05 cfs 1.146 of Subcatchment 2S: POST-Impery to Runoff Area=0.300 ac 100,00% Impervious Runoff Depth=4.96" Tc=5.0 min CN=98 Runoff=2.29 cfs 0.124 of Subcatchment 3S: POST -Lawn to Bio-Ret Runoff Area=0.130 ac 0.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=0.24" Tc=5.0 min CN=39 Runoff=0.01 cfs 0.003 of Subcatchment4S: POST to Infilt Basin Runoff Area=0.190 ac 68.42% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.97" Tc=5.0 min CN=79 Runoff=1.04 cfs 0.047 of Subcatchment 5S: Post -Bypass Runoff Area=6.180 ac 11.00% Impervious Runoff Depth=2.10" Flow Length=1,100' Tc=17.7 min CN=69 Runoff=15.24 cfs 1.084 of Pond 1 P: Bio-Retention Area Peak Elev=996.84' Storage=3,223 cf Inflow=2.29 cfs 0.127 of Outflow=0.58 cfs 0.100 of Pond 2P: Infiltration Basin Peak Elev=997.64' Storage=540 cf Inflow=1.04 cfs 0.047 of Discarded=0.04 cfs 0.034 of Primary=0.81 cfs 0.013 of Outflow=0.85 cfs 0.047 of Link 6L: POST-DEV TO POI Inflow=16.15 cfs 1.197 of Primary=16.15 cfs 1.197 of ray From: Justin Rabidoux Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:30 AM To: ray Subject: Church of Latter -Day Saints Ray, I have no comments on this plan. Justin Rabidoux Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 (802)658-7961 jabidoux@sburl.com www.sburl.com Twitter: twitter.com/sbpubworks Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. Church of Jesus Christ Latter Day Saints Distinctive Landscaping 2/4/15 Tree Planting Details and Specifications should be included in the plans otherwise the plans are fine ray From: Tom Dipietro Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 9:32 AM To: ray; Daniel Seneca l-Albrecht (dalbrecht@ccrpcvt.org) Cc: Justin Rabidoux Subject: RE: Church of Latter Day Saints Stormwater Improvements Project Ray and Dan, I have no further comments on the Church of Latter Day Saints Stormwater Improvements Project. The stormwater aspects of this project were previously reviewed and by DEC staff as part of issuance of the sites most recent stormwater permit. -Torn Thomas J. DiPietro Jr. Deputy Director Department of Public Works City of South Burlington Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. if you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. From: ray Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 8:50 AM To: Tom Dipietro Subject: RE: Church of Latter Day Saints Stormwater Improvements Project Tom, I've attached a file that includes their stormwater permit from the state if that help with your review. Ray Belair Administrative Officer City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 802-846-4106 www.sburl.com www.sbpathtosustainabilitV.com Notice - Under Vermont's Public Records Act, all e-mail, e-mail attachments as well as paper copies of documents received or prepared for use in matters concerning City business, concerning a City official or staff, or containing information relating to City business are likely to be regarded as public records which may be inspected by any person upon request, unless otherwise made confidential by law. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by return email. Thank you for your cooperation. FINDINGS- OF FACT & DECISION STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Re: Findings of Fact, application of David Luce to amend a previously approved site plan for a 275 seat church. The amendment consists of modifications to the parking area, 400 Swift Street. On the 11th day of March, 1997, the South Burlington Planning Commission approved the request of David Luce for site plan review under Section 26.10 of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations based on the following findings: 1. This project consists of amending a previously approved site plan for a 275 seat church. The amendment consists of modifications to the parking area. The last review of this property by the Commission was on 6 / 28 / 83 . 2. This property located at 400 Swift Street lies within the R2 and C.O. Districts. It is bounded on the east by a church, on the north and west by the Ridgewood residential development, and on the south by Swift Street. 3. Access/circulation: Access is provided by a 26 foot curb cut on Swift Street. No changes proposed. Access on the site is adequate. 4. Coverage / setbacks: Building coverage is 13 % ( maximum allowed is 20%) . Overall coverage is 50 % (maximum allowed is 40%) . This is an existing situation which will not be made worse by this application. Pavement will be removed along the northerly boundary to compensate for the green island being removed in the parking lot so there will be no increase in overall coverage. Front yard coverage is 8.5 % (maximum allowed is 30%) . Setback requirements are met. 5. Parking: A total of 92 spaces are required and 118 spaces including five (5) handicapped spaces and a bike rack will be provided. 6. Landscaping: No additional landscaping, based on building costs, is required. Plan shows existing landscaping in addition to landscaping that was required in the 6 / 28 / 83 approval which was never planted. The proposed landscaping has a value of $3240. 7. Traffic: No additional traffic will be generated. 8. Dumpster: The existing dumpster storage area will be screened. 9. Lighting: Exterior lighting consists of: --- eight (8) 250 watt high pressure sodium lamps with downcasting shielded fixtures mounted on 20 foot poles. 1 --- six (6) building mounted flood lights will be replaced with 50 watt high pressure sodium lamps. DECISION & CONDITIONS Based on the above Findings of Fact, the South Burlington Planning Commission approves the site plan application of David Luce to amend a previously approved site plan for a 275 seat church. The amendment consists of modifications to the parking area, 400 Swift Street, as depicted on a four (4) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled "Existing Conditions and Demolition Plan," prepared by Engineering Ventures Inc., dated 1/10/97, last revised 3/10/97, with the following stipulations. 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the parking lot modifications will generate zero (0) additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 3. The applicant shall post a $3240 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 4. Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 5. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 6. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the modified parking area. 7. Any changes to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. Chairman or \ lbrk South Burlington Planning Commission ate 2 SURVEY NOTES j 1. DATUM Vertical: Existing Site Plan 2. Elevations shown are based on field measurements. Contours are merely an interpolation and should be considered as such only. 3. Underground facilities, structures and utilities have been plotted from a combination of field measurements, available maps, records and information provided by the owner, therefore their location should be considered approximate only. There also may be other facilities, structures or utilities the existence of which is Presently unknown. jtsBOB TOPSOIL, $EEO AND MULCH ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYR) �tJs REMOVE EXISTING "J1tsJ --PROPERTY PROPERTY LINE (APPROX.) TREE (TYR) ? / INV. 301.65 •' PEA GRAVEL FILTER STRIP AT \ \ 360- BACK EDGE OF FLUSH CURB (TYP.) �+s INV .362.60� / 6 'I-, -tes (Parking \ \g �JBf JJ S 161 �s?011 ~ TWIN 8"DIA. H.D.P.E. PIPE � 1711 INV. 362.50 ' I I Concrete Walk �I I � XI' fI•P� . �; Y!" 1bpN r" Y pl.\� \ 31/\ 3r ? F.F.E.• 369. 4' 1 PM nybg Ini V F.F.E.• 369. • 1• J6 8 on�rete� Retaining \ Wall • B J� Con rate Walk M NePI IIIV 981.85 - cretb Po � 1 Story th A Uni Brick Buildin .1ssl o e" J n J6 3 B •• F. te" U•e F.F. 69. pQ creto we 5'69 fie MY' Yopl f0 Y A J� c ®c Paeete 46, .49 V PN. Fla Po`l \ sf Ilk" �- PROPERTY LINE (APPROX.) P%9ter 's 0 J6. --366---- __*TSB s Ri64.54' =?/?/ Inv. 10" Plos uW1, Uy,U • 360.57' y Inu_1p" Plastic v - 9. \ 6ilTA. h It W I 36Lt p o a6 366oZ SWIFT = - Edoe Of Pauen.e"t BENCHMARK Top Railroad Spike Utility Pole 54593 Elev. - 367.51' VSWMM Criteria • Required Volume Recharge Volume Waived - Vergennes Clay - Type "D"aoll Channel Protection Volume - 0.121 acre-feet Water Quality Volume • 0.086 acre-feet Provided 0.137 acre-feet of storage in the dry wale up to elevation 363.40 for Channel Protection EET LEGEND GENERAL NOTES GRADINGIEROSIONCDNTROL NOTES: �-- 1. ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MOST 1. ALL PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE FINISHED GRADE - 363 - Proposed Contour RECENT STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF SOUTH ELEVATIONS. >=XQ-t Proposed Storm Sewer BURLINGTON AND VERMONT DEC. - - - - - Proposed Underdraln 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO SECURE 2. ALL DISTURBED AND CONSTRUCTED SLOPE AREAS ARE TO BE SEEDED ALL PERMITS AND ALL BONDS REQUIRED FOR THIS WORK. IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED. 0 Existing Clesnout - 402 Existing Ground Contour 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY 3. INSTALL SEDIMENT EROSION CONTROL DEVICES PRIOR TO START OF ,V Existing Utility Pole INSPECTIONS ANDIOR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES GRADING OPERATION AND AS NEEDED DURING UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES THAT SHALL BE PERFORMED INSTALL SITE UTILITIES AND STORM SEWER SYSTEM. INSTALL REMAINING ® Existing Catch Basin PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED POSSESSION AND THE FINAL Sewer Manhole Existing Storm CONNECTION OF SERVICES. 4, THE STOCKPILED TOPSOIL SHALL BE SPREAD TO A 6" s/yf�'* s* Seweranitary Manhole ExistingTelep THICKNESS TO BRING THE SITE TO FINISHED GRADE Existing Telephone Box 4• THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE, MARK, SAFEGUARD AND IN ALL AREAS TO BE SEEDED. EXCESS SOIL TO BE REMOVED OFF SITE. ® INV. 361.66 neBox PRESERVE ALL SURVEY CONTROL MONUMENTS AND R.O.W. 13 EXIsUng Light Pole MONUMENTS IN THE AREAS OF CONSTRUCTION. 5. ALL CURB INLETS, FIELD INLETS, END SECTIONS AND OTHER 0 Existing Delineator SIMILAR DRAINAGE INLET STRUCTURES SHALL BE PROTECTED 5. CAUTION - NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: THE CONTRACTOR IS FROM SILTATION BY STAKED BALES AND FILTER FABRIC OR SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR OTHER APPROVED EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. 4" DIA. PERFORATED P.V.C. ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS UNDERDRAIN PIPE MR) IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND WHERE 6. CLEAR AND GRUB SITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONTRACT I 36 f POSSIBLE MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS SPECIFICATIONS. n TOP OF BERM ELEV. 363.50 NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACTOR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO CALL DIG SAFE VERMONT 7. ANY TREES REMOVED OR DAMAGED OTHER THAN THOSE DESIGNATED FOR CLEARING SHALL BE REPLACED AT A I AND THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY 2T01 RATIO. ( AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST \ EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE EXPLORATION EXCAVATIONS TO LOCATE EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SUFFICIENTLY AHEAD OF B ?°6 CONSTRUCTION TO PERMIT REVISIONS AS REQUIRED TO MEET .01 a a EXISTING CONDITIONS. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF I 'f? THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH � CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE 1 SILT FENCE (TYR) PLANS' 6. ALL PAVEMENTS DISTURBED BY NEW CONSTRUCTION AND INDICATED a TO REMAIN SHALL BE RESTORED TO THE SATISFACTION �I TOP OF BERM ELEV. 383.50 OF THE GOVERNING AGENCIES. Asphalt Wolk cog 365 B. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO BE ESTABLISHED PRIOR TO COMMENCING EARTHWORK. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL UPSTREAM GROUNDCOVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED AND REMOVAL IS APPROVED. JAN 6 38"MIN. FENCE POST PERSPECTIVE VIEW WOVENVAREFENCE 14'40A. MIN., MAX. 8' MESH SPACING 98' MIN. FENCE POSTS, DRIVEN MIN. 18"INTO 10, �°i4�," fy r`,`,. F..lurlll""Ig$L:ii Burlington MAX. C. IOC, " WITH FILTER CLOTH OVER GROUND WOVEN V�rIRE FENCE 20" MIN. MIN. 14 4GAUGE PLOW MAX. 8" MESH SPACING UNDISTURBED GROUND HEIGHT OF FILTER MIN. 16"MIN. EMBED FILTER CLOTH MIN. 8" INTO GROUND SECTION ,yytt�� 8' MIN, CONSTRUCTION NOTES FOR FABRICATED FENCE 1. WOVEN WIRE FENCE TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO FENCE 4. MAINTENANCE SHALL BE PERFORMED AS NEEDED AND MATERIAL REMOVED WHEN "BULGES' DEVELOP IN THE SILT FENCE WITH WIRE TIES OR STAPLES 2. FILTER CLOTH TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE POSTS: STEEL EITHER T OR U TYPE 2" HARDWOOD FENCE WITH TIES SPACED EVERY 24" AT TOP AND MID SECTION FENCE: WOVEN WIRE, 14 GA. 8" MAX. MESH OPENING FILTER S. WHEN TWO SECTIONS OF FILTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER, THEY SHALL BE OVER -LAPPED BY SIX INCHES AND FOLDED CLOTH: FILTER IL MIRAFI 100K STAIMUNKAT14ON OR APPROVED EQUAL PREFAB UNIT: GEOFAB, ENVIROFENCE, OR APPROVED EQUAL 12" WIDE X 12' DEEP PEA GRAVEL FILTER STRIP AT BACK EDGE OF FLUSH CURB MR) EXISTING FLUSH CURB EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT - / NrtwrtNwrcrtacelnlnsl2wlrtuenlR: LAWNARIAS KENTUCKYBLUEGRASS(PDAPRATENSIS) QUICK ER09K)NCONTROL MIX (MARCNtb-OCT.1b): ANNUAL RYEGRASS (LOLRRI MULTIFIORUM) ANNUAL RYEGRASS (LOLIUMMULTIFIORUM) RED FESCUE (FESTUCA RUBRA) TURF TYPE PERENNIAL RYEGRASS (LOLIUM PERENNE) SEEDING RATE S BULK POUNDS PER 1,000 SF SEEDING RATE 50 BULK POUNDS PER ACRE SEEDBEDS MUST BE SEEDED WTTHW 24 HOURS OF DISTURBANCE hitSCARIFICATIO1 PLAN COLD SEASON EROSION CONTROL MIX(OCT. 16-MARCH I6) OF THEM SURFACE WILL BE NECESSARY STRAW MULCH WALL BL APPLIED AT WINTER RYE (SECALE CEREALE) RATE OF 2 TONSIACRE (S POUNDS PER 100 SQUARE FEET). HAY MULCH MUST NOT BE SCALE: 1 "•30' SEEDING RATE 100 BULK POUNDS PER ACRE USED. HYORD-MULCH MALL RF APPUFn AT THE MANINFAMIRFRit 11911 Ugid 1 SILT FENCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING GRADE FINISHED GRADE BOTTOM OFSWALE ELEV 582.50 ----� ----____ 9 6" 1 PEA GRAVEL, _ 3 1 24.1 8" 4" DIA. PERFORATED P.V.C. UNDERDRAIN PIPE -INV. 361 PERMEABLE SOIL FILTER FABRIC BOTTOM OF PERMEABLE SOIL ELEV. 360.5 TOP OF BERM ELEV. 363.60 TOPSOIL, SEED AND MULCH ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYR) SILT FENCE 3 PERMEABLE SOIL REQUIREMENTS SOIL CLASSIFICATION • SM OR ML PH • 6.2-7.0 ORGANIC MATTER -1.5%TO4.0% CLAY 10%T0 25% SILT 30%TO 55% SAND 30%TO 60% ROV1510N ARGHIf6GfUKA1. MANA(,6R PAVE RIGHAK06) A.I.A. PROJOGf ARGH1f6Gf PAVE KIGHAK06) A.I.A. OKAWN GY fNOMA6 FIA6GIK) F.E. PROJ60f NUM099 6OUTH OURI,INGfON y x U LL �� S� m NN a z G SfAMP ...... F'�E ti -- e ? NO. 91 o Ci c PR006f fOR THE CHURCH OF JIESUS CH]EUST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS PROJ60f NAME 60UtH OURI,IN6fON 6f0KMWAf6K K6fK0Flf 2010 PROPOKfY NO. 11R0dfGf AOOR655 400 SWIFT 6fREEf 50UfH OURI-INwN) Vf 05403 51166f f 111,6 PL,AN ANO Off 11,5 PROP6RfY NUM06R 11 I i 1 1 RIDGEWOOD DRIVE N/f R/OGEW000 COMMON LAND PARCEL/ 1040-00000-CL -"� XISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED TOPSOIL, SEED, AND MULCH ALL (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN) DISTURBED AREAS (TYR) ILT FENCE f- - a' wtB e 10' wRnE ]'WHAT PINES MAPLE I UD � �, LID\ -4-- I 4 INV. 361.651 - UE tt'-pB�--UE mEE e•PINE I � Lw II II \ PEA GRAVEL' FILTER SYRIP{. -- I (a.) II I o I I - I '', II AT BACK EDGE OF FLUSH I � I - CURB (SEE DETAIL ON I _ APPROVED _STORMWATER _ I T PLAN) I ` \ I` + 'g REMOVE EXISTING STRIPING AND RE -STRIPE LAST 3 SPACES TO PROWDE AN ADDITIONAL VAN ACCESSIBLE HANDICAPPED SPACE. 1 '*d I \ 9 1Ihl INV 36250� I,eI \ / ASPlNLT PARA'N1: \ 1 I �� \ TWIN 6" qA HOPE PIPES I III } INV. 362,50-1 I � I 6'CRAAA C I C MN/7 110 AMPLE 10 APLE \ PPE. J69.0 L 0 NP BiBIRCN� =.� la' PINI I � I 1a'PINL I 25.9'+/- EFE J69.16 s' AP LC �CRae r 10' CRAB APPLE 10.0' F.F.E. J69.0 ?,� 11 BIRCH N CLUMP CONCRETE FADS-,, L IWN A/C MW7S C. EXISDNG 1-STORY BRICK BUILDING FFE J69.I1 OD S.Y. 70� �dIP[E �1lIPl'E I N/F THE CNURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LA -DAY SAINTS PARCEL/ 1700 00400 12 "INE 10" PINT I 10' LNK 19 MAL (R-2) ro's7As1e -- --- ASRWr DISTRICT G ... r +- )RHOOD RESIDENTIAL - - )SING DISTRICT h N/F ECONOMO/1 FARM R040 COMMON LAND Qz PARCEL( 0611-00001-CL O h ® V O o cA a� A �V DIV. 3 ut--a: aWE\Na / NAF BRYAN D & CHR15TY B YAGER PARCEL/ 0570-01001 N rl 65 I " DO, PERFORATED PVC UNDERDRAIN PIPE (TYP.) (SEE DETAIL ON APPROVED STORMWATER PLAN) TOP OF BERM ELEV. 363.50 I I ASPHALT WA_( LK I I I � I OP OF BERMI ELEV. 363.50 It m O L Qr RENOVE EXISTINGWOOD REEL EI I I FENCE AND REPLACE PROPOSED CHAINLINK FEI rrFl- / DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. SIPLING I (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) i 0 U/SANG lCK foulLDl F. 66.21 ',IIII MPCf 6' PINt iBL o ,Ir-10. � 6 PINE I I} I N/F CONGREGA7/ON OF TEMPLE SOW/ PARCEL/ 1700-00500 iS TOAl;- MWK , G RESIDENTIAL (R72)__ ZONING DISTRICT -- STREET - NATURAL -- -- NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION (NRP) ZONING DISTRICT N/F JAM GOLF UC PARCEL) 0570-01227 1 GRAPHIC SCALE AI No GENERAL NOit 1. THIS PUN IS BASED ON A PUN ENTITLED "THE CHURCH OF JESUS - CHRIST OF UTTER -DAY SAINTS: SOUTH BURLINGTON STORMWATER RETDRFIT - SHEET SE1.0-PUNS AND DETAILS", PREPARED BY PIASCIK ENGINEERING, AND DATED OCTOBER 7, 2010. EXISTING FEATURES, PROPERTY LINES, CONTOUTS, AND UTILITIES SHOWN ON THIS PUN WERE OBTAINED FROM SAID PLAN. 2. THE PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS AND OTHER REAL PROPERTY Stamp DESCRIPTIONS PROVIDED IN THIS PUN ARE FOR THE USE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON AND FOR LOCAL PERMITTING ONLY. THEY DO NOT DEFINE LEGAL RIGHTS OR MEET LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR A LAND SURVEY AS DESCRIBED IN VT, AND SHALL NOT BE USED IN LIEU OF A o SURVEY AS THE BASIS OF ANY LAND TRANSFER OR ESTABLISHMENT OF ANY PROPERTY RIGHT. 3. UTILITIES SHOWN DO NOT PURPOSE TO CONSTITUTE OR REPRESENT ALL UTILITIES LOCATED UPON OR ADJACENT TO THE PREMISES. EXISTING UTILITY PROJECT I�� - LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY AND WERE OBTAINED FROM THE (" R J AFOREMENTIONED APPROVED STORMWATER PUN (SEE NOTE 1) AND A II N PLAN ENTITLED 'PROPOSED SITE CONDITIONS PLAN FOR THE CHURCH OF ffj JESUS CHRIST OF UTTER DAY SAINTS", PREPARED BY ENGINEERING o VENTURES AND UST REVISED 3/10/97. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL UTILITY CONFUCTS. ALL DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REPORTED TO THE ARCHITECT, OWNER, AND ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT DIG SAFE A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. d 4. THE TAX PARCEL OF THE PROPERTY IS 1700-00400, AND THE OVERALL SITE LOCATION LOCATION IS 4DO SWIFT STREET, SOUTH BURLINGTON, Vr. PROPERTY re OWNER/APPLICANT INFORMATION IS: THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF UTTER -DAY SAINTS 0 400 800 1600 N CONTACT: JOSEPH MENDER 293 LOS LANE �,: s 7_1161 SOUTH ROYALTON, VT 05068 1" = 800' PHONE: 802-763-0198 SCALE: FAX: 802-763-8199 EMAIL: MenderJROldschurch.org LEGEND 5. THIS SITE IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE VICINITY OF A FEMA DESIGNATED EXISTING FEATURES - 100-YEAR FLOODPWN. oC/D CLEAN OUT ZONING TABULATION SAr,ITaTYwwHpLE ZONING DISTRICT: RESIDENTIAL 2 ® k REQUIRE EXISTING G LID CATCH BASIN U 22,000 SF 126,831 SF (2.91 AC.)+/- MIN LOT SIZE ® STORM MANHOLE MAX BUILDING COVERAGE 20% 13% (16,480 SF +/-) (1) S MAX IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE 40% 505 (63,420 SF +/-) (1) 6 LIGHT POLE u 30% 8.5% (780 SF +/-) (1) MAX FRONT YARD COVERAGE 30.0' 70.6' (+/-) 0 ¢ UTILITY POWER POLE w w 3 MIN. FRONT YARD SETBACK K 10.0' 25.9' (+/-) TREE z Q $ MIN. SIDE YARD SETBACK 30.0, 182.4' (+/-) - MIN. REAR YARD SETBACK WATERCOURSE Z w MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT 15.0, <15' w v m g 3 d ACCESSORY 25.0' <25' .i�rYYYY�r�. TREELINE a $ PRINCIPAL (FLAT) _ PRINCIPAL (PITCHED) 28.0' 128' FENCE m V STORIES FACING STREET 3 1 o STORIES BELOW ROOFLINE CONTOUR ROOFUNE STORIES 1 1 4 1 TOTAL STORIES - - PROPERLY LINE 0 (1) - BUILDING AND IMPERVIOUS COVERAGES TAKEN FROM NOTE 4 OF 'FINDINGS OF FACT - - EDGE OF PAVEMENT m 00 h DECISION" OF CITY OF SOUTH BURUNGTDN FOR THE PROPERTY, DATED 3/18/97 y� y ow -- S - SANITARY SEWER LINE U PARKING TABULATION sI STORM LINE a) w --- -- off ----- OVERHEAD ELECTRIC 92^ TOTAL REO'D PARKING SPACES -UE- - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 0 4 „ n 0.5 SPACES/ 1 SEAT REQUIRED .� .�. Nrc0 275 SEATS G ---- GAS LANE fv 0.5 X 275 SEATS = 137.5 => 138 SPACES REQUIRED (1) W -- WATER LANE U TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED = 116 SPACES (2) RIGHT-OF-WAY LANE (1) -TOTAL SEATS OF CHURCH TAKEN FROM NOTE 1 OF 'FINDINGS OF FACT 8 0 DECISION" OF CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON FOR THE PROPERLY, DATED 3/18/97 - - SETBACK E- (2) - NOTE 5 OF THE "FINDINGS OF FACT @ DECISION" OF THE CITY OF SOUTH PROPOSED FEATURES BURUNGTON, DATED 3/18/97 INDICATES THAT 92 SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND 118 ARE v PROVIDED. ACCORDING TO THE CURRENT ZONING REGULATIONS SILT FENCE TIONS OF 0.5 SPACES/SEAT, 136 +' SPACES ARE REQUIRED. FIELD CONDITIONS INDICATE ONLY 116 SPACES, THERE IS NO UD UNDER DRAIN PROPOSED CHANGE TO THE BUILDING USE OR PARKING AREAS AS PART OF THIS ® COUNiOUR APPLICATION ao STORMWATER DESIGN NOTES: 1. ALL STORMWATER FEATURES HAVE BEEN DESIGNED BY PIASCIK ENGINEERING. THE STORWWATERWATER DESIGN HAS NOT BEEN ALTERED �O FROM THE APPROVED PLAN. AN AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER GENERAL PERMIT (3-9030) WAS ISSUED ON APRIL 4, 2012. A NOTICE OF INTENT NO. 6318-9030 IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT. 2. FOR ALL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT DETAILS, DESIGN, AND EXISTING AND PROPOSED INFORMATION, REFER TO THE PUN ENTITLED "THE U CZ CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF UTTER -DAY SAINTS: SOUTH BURLINGTON STORMWATER RETORFR - SHEET SE1.0-PLANS AND DETAILS', 3 5 PREPARED BY PIASCIK ENGINEERING, AND DATED OCTOBER 7, 2010. o 10'-0* O.C. MAXIMUM 6'-0" 6'-0' 4 C!] m 1" COPPER GROUND GATE EW1MEs t.5' di. T ` BRAID TOP AND BOTTOM O.D. PIPE .-1~ 1.5"0 TOP RAIL N 2'0 CORNIER Posr V 5/rdo. BRACE ROD 2 1/2'dia. LINE POST 4•din CITE p"I ^C� q POSTS 31edw. TRUSS ROD m (/j AND TURNBUCKLE 2' GRAY MESH 9 MRE) m m t o _ / a 3 8'd'e. TRUSS RODS I 4 CENTER BAR I I Designed By: MD/PG AND TURNBUCKLES 4 Checked By: PG Drawn By: M Scale: 1";,--3-0, Date: 12/19/2014 T (�P ALL GATE i I � — .—.--- ' RIDGEWOOD DRIVE �R�NCTON CREEN i '" , _ N/F RIOGEW000 COMMON UNO PARCEL/ 1040-00000-CL \ (3)Ps (3)Ps (3)Ps T _ _ .III I I � it 79 I I I I I I I ml `\ I ` i I I O7 / g U � I I 10111 25I4'+ - I / I I S.Y. _ 'I S.Y. } 1 -) 10. .. i N/F THE CHURCH OF ✓fSUS � T CHRIST OF UTTER -DAY SAINTS PARCELI 1700-00400 I EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP•) / / / N/F BRYAN 0 & CHRISTY B YAGER PARCEL,/ 0570-01001 N/F CONGREGARON OF TEMPLE SIN41 PARCELf 1700-00500 —4 -- RESIDENTI6L-.-(R72)__ ZONING DISTRICT --rs�H F+ tub T-R E-E T x� ..�:aae .titi.. . s.r..w_ee NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION _ (NRP) ZONIN DISTRICT -- Church of Latter— Day Saints — Storm water improvements (Trees to be removed: From east to west on site plan) "GRADING SCALE LATIN NAME COMMON NAME SIZE REPLACMENT TREE DECIDUOUS/ EVERGREEN REPLACEMENT TREE ABBREVIATION CITY & SIZE 0 Acer rubrum Red maple 1.5" Col Deciduous Ar (1)2" Cal 4 Quercus palustris Pin oak 4.5" Cal Deciduous Ua (1)2" Cal 0 Acer rubrum Red maple 1.5" Cal Deciduous Ua (1)2" Cal 0 Missing Quercus Oak Deciduous Qb (1)2" Cal 7 Quercus palustris Pin oak 11" Cal Deciduous Qb (4)2" Cal 0 Pinus strobus White pine 10" Cal Evergreen ps - Ever reens 0 0 Pinus strobus ssing cer White pine Red mople 10" Cal Evergreen Deciduous Ps Ar - Ever reens (1)2" Cal 2 Acer rubrum Red maple 2" Cal Deciduous Uo (1)2" Cal 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 7" Cal Deciduous Ua (1)2" Cal 0 ssmg cer Red mople Deciduous Ar (2)2" Cal 1 Pinus strobus White pine 7" Cal Evergreen Ps - Evergreens •Trees groded from 0 (dead) to 10 (Dariect) hurch of Latter —Day Saints — Storm water improvment —Planting Schedule Plant List Abbreviations Latin Nome Common Name Size Qty Ar Acer rubrum Red maple 2" Cal 4 uo Ulmus americans 'Princeton Elm 2" Cal 4 Ps Pinus strobus White pine 4-5 Ft g Ob Quercus bicolor Swamp white oak 2" Cal 5 LANDSCAPE DESIGN NOTES: 1. LANDSCAPING DESIGN WAS DEVELOPED BY DISTINCTIVE LANDSCAPING OF CHARLOTTE, VT. 2. ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED FEATURES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO SITE PLAN (SHEET C1.0) AND EXISTING APPROVED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED FEATURES. JANq o �, 2313 City of So. Cudin gton Stamp zo Designed By: MD/PG Checked By: PG Drown By: MD Scale: 1 = 30' Date: 12/19/2014 PIAPIASCIK 3059 Clinton Road Weedsport, New York 13166 ENGINEERING Cell Phone 315-727-5013 Home/Fax 315-834-9236 October 13, 2010 Mr. Kevin Burke Vermont DEC 103 South Main Street Building 10 North Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 OCT I i Vl t:1^;t/iCONSE£�fax�t"t1'A 1 W r �2 i?t1 at t iY Or VISION V SION Re: LDS Meetinghouse - South Burlington, VT PN: 1120 Dear Mr. Burke, On behalf of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints we have enclosed for your review and approval the following documents related to stormwater improvements at the above -referenced project: • "Plan and Details" Drawing No. SE1.0, prepared by Piascik Engineering, dated October 7, 2010 • Associated drainage calculations and supporting data As you are aware, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Meetinghouse located at 400 Swift Street in the City of South Burlington drains to Potash Creek which is an impaired watershed. As such, the Church is required to comply with the requirements of Vermont DEC General Permit 3-9030 specifically "Appendix A". Due to the fact the majority of the project site is currently developed, some portions of the property are not acceptable for receiving stormwater retrofits meeting the requirements of the Vermont DEC General Permit 3-9030 and Vermont Stormwater Management Manual. As such we would like to provide a brief summary of the stormwater design proposal for this project for your consideration. The project site is approximately 2.5 acres of developed building, parking lot and grass areas with water leaving the project site as sheet flow to the north, south, east and west. No storm sewers currently exist on site and all flow is overland. The Meetinghouse building does not have gutters and flow is directed from the roof to a perimeter gravel landscape area around the building. We believe the majority of the roof runoff infiltrates into this gravel landscape area and does not run off the project Page 1 Date 10/13/10 site. We believe the building may have a 4-inch diameter foundation drain which is connected to a drainage structure within the Swift Street right-of-way. The project site has been divided into four (4) sub -area watersheds for analysis (see attached plan). They include the following: Sub -Area Description Size No. I Northeast part of site includes building, parking lot 1.40 acres No.2 Northwest part of site includes building, grass 0.28 acres No.3 Southwest part of site includes building, grass 0.57 acres No.4 Southeast part of site includes grass, brush 0.24 acres Based upon our review and feasibility of drainage retrofit improvements for the project site we feel the only viable location for drainage retrofit improvements would be Sub -Area No. I. We have selected a "Dry Swale" to meet the requirements of Vermont DEC General Permit 3-9030 and "Appendix A". Due to grade and site area limitations, some modifications to the standard "Dry Swale" detail have been made to meet site conditions. A summary of calculations related to Sub -Area No. I follows: VSWMM Criteria Required Volume Recharge Volume Waived - Vergennes Clay - Type "D" soil Channel Protection Volume 0.121 acre-feet Water Quality Volume 0.086 acre-feet We have provided 0.137 acre-feet of storage in the dry swale up to elevation 363.40 for Channel Protection Volume and Water Quality Volume. Should the capacity of the dry swale be exceeded, overflow water will be overland along an existing paved sidewalk towards the east. Current site drainage patterns will be maintained. We have reviewed the Vermont Environmental Resource Locator and have not located any Wetlands and/or Endangered or Threatened wildlife species within the project site. Please advise us if you need any further information for this project at this time. Yours truly, r Thomas Piascik, P.E. Enc. Cc: Mr. David A. Richards, A.I.A. Page 2 Date 10/ 13/ 10 STORMWATER RETOFIT CALCULATIONS AND SUPPORTING DATA LDS MEETINGHOUSE SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 100219.11 .. 1 • . . - THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS SOUTH BURLINGTON F� 1 Q:t 2t tivATl R Qtafiir 011 11, RV Tura rC}N CHITTENDEN COUNTY, VERMONT PN: 1120 OCTOBER 12, 2010 v'z X XX- tea►' �QP PIAS CIK ENGINEERING 3059 Clinton Road Weedsport, New York 13166 Cell Phone 315-727-5013 Home/Fax 315-834-9236 LiDIS CH U"14 S1tc '544.TF+ A Cam,: • , �,,. •„ "I 5vit 0--v; Suit Survay strstua 6tn�s.ry PrwiHenc+o+r t.04"t n • 4. da !?, Area of Interest (AOI) Soil Map Soil Date EXplorer Shopping Cart (Free) View Soil Information By Use: All UFrn Pa4n 6f• Vsnlan AiW CA Rkgdil�W Gait: �i Intro to Sultabilitles and Suit propei`ties Ecologk z .4" Soil Solis Limitations for Use and Qualttie+c 1. ra= mr ,, Reports i JL+ati O Pr"crr ?rti?<: and OuAtic-s Open All Cl."All Sol 11 Chemical Properties Soil Erosion Factors Soil Physical Properties Soil Qualities and Features T FASHTO Group Classification (Surface) Depth to a Selected Soil Restrictive Layer Depth to Any Soil RestrlcUve Layer Drainage Class Frost Action Frost -Free Days lrydtalrlglt SoJ G! mp View Description ] view Rath+ View Options Ci} 0 map Table Description of r Rating Rating Options 1= r Detailed Description Advanced Options 0 Q Aggregation Dominant Condition Method Component Percent Cutoff Tie -break Rule Lower Higher Vhaw Oaosieriptien.) Wwww Ratios The soils In the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual hfap Unit Name losses (A/D, B/D, and C/D), The groups are defined as follows; Group A. Solis having a high Infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. Parent Material Name These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission, Representative Slope Group B. Soils having a moderate Infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained Solis that Unified Soil Classification (Surface) have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate (71 rate of water transmission. Water Features Group C. Solis having a slow Infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that Impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately http,//websei I.stirvey,nrc-S,iiSda,gov/a.nn/WebSei ISurvey, ast)x ( Warnings Soil Ratings Map may not be valid at this scale. J 1p have zoomed In beyond the scale at which the soil map for this area Is Intended to be used. Mapping of soils Is done at a particular scale. The soil surveys that comprise Your AOI were mapped at I:IS,840. The design of map units and the level of detail shown In the resulting soil map are dependent on that map scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. T21bli--; — }lydrol"le Soil Grow- — >,imrnary By Map Unit Summary by Map Unit — Chittenden County, Vermont Map unit Map unit name Rating Acres In AOI Percent of AOI symbol V08 Vergennes day, 2 to 6 D 2.9 100.0% percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 2.9 100.0% Oescription Hydn_>logie Boil G_r44 Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Solis are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water Infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long -duration storms. 6/11 /201 Q fine texture or fine texture, These soils have a slow rate of water transmission Gruup D. Soils having a very slow Infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly Impervious material. These sons have a very slow rate of water transmission. It a soli Is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter Is for drained areas and the second Is for undralned areas. Only the soils that In their natural condition are In arouo D are assloned to dual classes. ltatinc duns — Hydrologic Soil Group Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie -break Rule: Lower FOIA I Accessibility Statement i Privacy Policy I Non-Dlscriminatlon Statement I Information Quality I LISA.gov I White House 'ROPERTY LWE (APPROX.) 363 — INV.381.70 _363�J sus� Porkin9 _ �%' 1 .\ \ �" • TOP OF BERM i. • \ �' oncr•t.� • R.tohr.q \ '-' wa co .t. IN \ w tor o�cnl Y Brick Buildin T � F.E 369. ing f. 69. 'tr- onu.t. I4 / ..« A sw \ _- moo•- — 16{--- _"`� Rim 6{.�4' „•3¢0~57bs ' b Ploatic • �,•Dnd1 — Mphdl Wol4 366 U2' nr.•3 9.7365 4 77' _ �1 M / c QI O.fmM Swift StreetPayernent ` LSD `>� i Y�l �) j: �) �.i,l r- i �>r� �.,— 4QF> PIASCIK ENGINEERING -I- Project uk,(- � Description vouumd LC - L LOP— Project Number 112,0 Made By---/,-e_+�+ fr Date /0 Checked By I� PIASCIK Project Number / ENGINEERING Made By Project L.D 5 u ALL H Sam- 0 �c-�I V 1 0 /a Date Description W [A 0�( LA r" I�Pr 1 ,") Checked By A) Iz Arc F-C-�� = U - 6.�-+ 0. 009 (S) p- =0.,w1. 5J 4QR PIASCIK ;6 *6 ENGINEERING Project Number zo AN .4 n —7 �14 --A a e Project Cp i�e-, I)e,-, 7�,,J I Date A , Ll o Description -�pt*lt) i�L AZOSCI"'-j C,,'-L-C.-UL'\"Checked By f I l,1 Z sk, C'111,6�I�Z -- 1.143 L V-5 40 P PIASCIK 7. Project Number ENGINEERING -- -:,p Made By Project Date Description (A C. C, Checked By— 0 of 2,6 z (,0 0 ******************80-80 LIST OF INPUT DATA FOR TR-20 HYDROLOGY****************** JOB TR-20 FULLPRINT SUMMARY TITLE LDS CHURCH SOUTH BURLINGTON TITLE POST -DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS 6 RUNOFF 1 001 1 .0022 95.0 0.1 ENDATA 7 INCREM 6 .1 7 COMPUT 7 001 001 0. 2.1 1. 2 2 01 01 ENDCMP 1 ENDJOB 2 ********************************END OF 80-80 LIST******************************* TR20 SCS - LDS CHURCH SOUTH BURLINGTON VERSION 10/12/** POST -DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS 2.04TEST 20:03:02 PASS 1 JOB NO. 1 PAGE 1 EXECUTIVE CONTROL INCREM MAIN TIME INCREMENT = .100 HOURS EXECUTIVE CONTROL COMPUT FROM XSECTION 1 TO XSECTION 1 STARTING TIME _ .00 RAIN DEPTH = 2.10 RAIN DURATION = 1.00 ANT. RUNOFF COND. = 2 MAIN TIME INCREMENT = .100 HOURS ALTERNATE NO. = 1 STORM NO. = 1 RAIN TABLE NO. = 2 OPERATION RUNOFF XSECTION 1 OUTPUT HYDROGRAPH = 1 AREA = .00 SQ MI INPUT RUNOFF CURVE = 95. TIME OF CONCENTRATION = .10 HOURS COMPUTED INTERNAL TIME INCREMENT = .0171 HOURS PEAK TIME(HRS) PEAK DISCHARGE(CFS) PEAK ELEVATION(FEET) 11.93 3.2 (RUNOFF) RUNOFF ABOVE BASEFLOW (BASEFLOW = .00 CFS) 1.58 WATERSHED INCHES; 2 CFS-HRS; .2 ACRE-FEET. *** WARNING - MAIN TIME INCREMENT ( .100) IS GREATER THAN 50% OF THE TIME OF CONCENTRATION ( .10) FOR SUBWATERSHED XSECTION 1. THIS WILL REDUCE THE COMPUTED PEAK BY ABOUT 7.3%. *** EXECUTIVE CONTROL ENDCMP COMPUTATIONS COMPLETED FOR PASS 1 E TR20 SCS - LDS CHURCH SOUTH BURLINGTON VERSION 10/12/** POST -DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS 2.04TEST 20:03:02 SUMMARY, JOB NO. 1 PAGE 2 SUMMARY TABLE 1 SELECTED RESULTS OF STANDARD AND EXECUTIVE CONTROL IN ORDER PERFORMED. A CHARACTER FOLLOWING THE PEAK DISCHARGE TIME AND RATE (CFS) INDICATES: F-FLAT TOP HYDROGRAPH T-TRUNCATED HYDROGRAPH R-RISING TRUNCATED HYDROGRAPH XSECTION/ STANDARD PEAK DISCHARGE STRUCTURE CONTROL DRAINAGE RUNOFF ------------------------------------ ID OPERATION AREA AMOUNT ELEVATION TIME RATE RATE (SQ MI) (IN) (FT) (HR) (CFS) (CSM) RAINFALL OF 2.10 inches AND 24.00 hr DURATION, BEGINS AT .0 hrs. RAINTABLE NUMBER 2, ARC 2 MAIN TIME INCREMENT .100 HOURS ALTERNATE 1 STORM 1 --------------------------- XSECTION 1 RUNOFF .00 1.58 --- 11.93T 3T******** TR20 SCS - LDS CHURCH SOUTH BURLINGTON VERSION 10/12/** POST -DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS 2.04TEST 20:03:02 SUMMARY, JOB NO. 1 PAGE 3 SUMMARY TABLE 3 --------------- STORM DISCHARGES (CFS) AT XSECTIONS AND STRUCTURES FOR ALL ALTERNATES QUESTION MARK (?) AFTER: OUTFLOW PEAK - RISING TRUNCATED HYDROGRAPH. XSECTION/ DRAINAGE STRUCTURE AREA STORM NUMBERS.......... ID (SQ MI) 1 XSECTION 1 .00 --------------------------- ALTERNATE 1 3 TR20 ----------------------- --------------------------------------------- scs - LDS CHURCH SOUTH BURLINGTON VERSION 10/12/** POST -DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS 2.04TEST END OF -1 JOBS IN THIS RUN SCS TR-20, VERSION 2.04TEST FILES INPUT = C:\TR20\BUR.DAT GIVEN DATA FILE OUTPUT = C:\TR20\BUR.OUT , DATED 10/12/ **,20:03:02 FILES GENERATED - DATED 10/12/**,20:03:02 NONE! TOTAL NUMBER OF WARNINGS = 1, MESSAGES = 0 JOB ENDED AT 20:03:02 *** TR-20 RUN COMPLETED *** TomP Region: Verrmont Locale: South Burlington Sub -Area Land Use and Curve Number Details Sub -Area Hydrologic Sub -Area Curve Identifier Land Use Soil Area Number Group (ac) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subarea 1 Open space; grass cover > 75% (good) D .2 80 Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways D 1.2 98 Total Area / Weighted Curve Number 1.4 95 WinTR-55, Version 1.00.00 Page 1 10/12/2010 3:41:13 PM Vermont Stormwater Treatment Standards Section 1 In evaluating water quality volume and STPs for water quality treatment, the following criteria shall be applied; • Impervious cover shall be measured from the site plan and shall include all areas that do not have permanent vegetative or permeable cover. Impervious cover is defined as manmade surfaces, including, but not limited to, paved and unpaved roads, paved and unpaved parking areas, roofs, driveways, and walkways from which precipitation runs off rather than infiltrates. • The final WQv shall be treated by an acceptable STP from the list presented in Tables 2.1 and 2.2 of section 2 unless an alternative STP design is accepted by the Agency of Natural Resources (Agency) as described in section 2.5. • Where nonstructural STPs are employed in the site design, the WQv volume can be reduced in accordance with the stormwater credits described in section 3. • Water quality treatment for off -site areas that may drain to a STP is not required. • The water quality treatment standard can be met by providing 24-hour extended detention of the WQv (provided a micro -pool is specified, see section 2). A micropool is designed so that the extended detention volume is released over a 24-hour period. This storm should be routed separately from the channel protection (CPv) storm (i.e. volumes are additive). 1.1.2 Channel Protection Treatment Standard To protect stream channels from degradation, storage of the channel protection volume (CPv) shall be provided by means of 12 to 24 hours of extended detention storage (ED) for the one-year, 24-hour rainfall event. If a stormwater discharge is to a coldwater fish habitat, 12 hours of extended detention is required and if a stormwater discharge is to a warmwater fish habitat, 24 hours of extended detention is required. Coldwater fish habitats and warm water fish habitat designations are listed in the Vermont Water Quality Standards. The rainfall depth for use in channel protection calculations will vary depending on project location. In Vermont, the one-year, 24-hour rainfall ranges between 2 and 2.4 inches (NOAA, TP 40, 1961). Rainfall depths for the one-year, 24-hour storm event are provided in Table 1.2 on a County -by -County basis. Site designers should use the value provided in Table 1.2 unless specific data are available for a particular site location and prior approval has been obtained from the Agency. Table 1.2 Rainfall Depths Associated with the 1-Year, 2-Year, 10-Year, and 100-Year, 24-Hour Storm Event Vermont County 1-yr, 24-Hr Rainfall Depth 2-yr, 24-Hr Rainfall Depth 10-yr, 24-Hr Rainfall Depth 100-yr, 24-hr Rainfall Depth Addison 2.2 2.4 3.4 5.4 Bennington 2.3 2.8 4.0 6.8 Caledonia 2.2 2.3 3.1 5.4 Chittenden 2.1 2.3 3.2 5.2 Essex 2.2 2.3 1 3.1 5.1 1-4 Environmentai interest Locator VERMONT : Ta _ _ _ s. o�tcclt r wv-} �oo�aass�c.. tan�Al RAF "P Z41*41 , Asap Layers ACT250 ACT250 PERMITS Boundaries _! Buildings Elevation Emergency Management _. Special Flood Hazard Areas _.b Fish and wildlife Rare, Threatened, and Endan- 0Threatened or Endangwvd 1 Rare rP Significant Natural Communitif i-V' Deer Wintering Areas r Indiana Bat Summer Range By r Indiana Bat Hibernacula By To Fresh Water Resources JL. Ge-dogic information Imagery Stormwater (� Stormwater Permits (Status: F 1- Stormwater Permits (Status: 1 f Stormwater Impaired waterst (' Stormwater Impaired Subwat Transportation Waste Management { inriartsrni inrt �finr.�nc T;nrnlr u rl a to >, a m Y45 cs ra cup d1 Ll U•i Ut 1 J N 3$i} 0t O v o amlu TT 'N`v m a th y ? ice+ w a -t OL v rum34�� vQ n �a f Ln vi fo :3 ra fu v ar d L� [ o '-� I .e �. V IJ1V. O V 1 E Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Watershed Management Division 103 South Main Street, Building io North Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 April 4, 2012 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Terry J. Spallino, Director for Temporal Affairs 50 E. North Temple St. Salt Lake City, UT 84150 Re: Authorization to Discharge under General Permit 3-9030 Notice of Intent No. 6318-9030 Dear Mr. Spallino: Agency of Natural Resources [phone] 802-241-3777 The Stormwater Program hereby approves the Engineering Feasibility Analysis (EFA) Report and proposed best management plans (BMP plans) for the The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, located on Swift Street in South Burlington, Vermont, discharging to Potash Brook. The approved BMP plans are as follows: Approved EFA Report and BMP Plans: This project shall be constructed and operated in accordance with the EFA Report and the following BMP plans and details prepared by Piascik Engineering (Sheet No. SEL 0, Project Name: South Burlington Stormwater Retrofit, Sheet Title "Plan and Details, " dated 1010712012, revised 0212912012; and supporting information. The approved analysis and BMP plans will be posted on the Department's website for public access and review. The analysis and BMP plans will remain on the website for a period of fifteen (15) days. By no later than eighteen (18) months after the Secretary's approval of the analysis and BMP plans, the permittee shall implement the BMP plans for the designated discharge in accordance with the approved plans. Within sixty (60) days of completion of implementation of the identified BMP plans, the permittee shall submit to the Stormwater Program a written statement signed by a designer that the identified BMPs have been built or implemented and are currently operating in compliance with the plans and General Permit 3-9030. As - built -plans shall be submitted with the certification to reflect any modifications of the BMPs from the original plans submitted to the Stormwater Program. To preserve, enhance, restore, and conserve Vermont's natural resources, and protect human health, for the benefit of this and future generations. 63 - $-9030 -Apif14, 2012 Please also note that your authorization to discharge treated stormwater runoff under General Permit 3-9030 includes inspection, maintenance, and reporting requirements. Please read the permit and the previously issued authorization carefully. If you have any questions, please contact Kevin Burke at (802) 338-4892. Sincerely, pa—j Padraic Monks Stormwater Program Manager Water Quality Division cc: Thomas Piascik, P.E., Piascik Engineering Kevin Burke, Environmental Analyst, Stormwater Program Peter Keibel, Act 250 District Coordinator, Essex Jct. Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation Agency of Natural Resources Water Quality Division 103 South Main Street, Building so North [phone] 802-241-3770 Waterbury, Vr 05671-0408 [fax] 802-241-3287 February 10, 2010 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints Terry Spallino 50 East North Temple Street Salt Lake City, UT 84150 Re: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit 3-9030 for Designated Discharges to the Bartlett, Centennial, Englesby, Morehouse and Potash Brook Watersheds Authorization of Notice of Intent # 6318-9030 Dear Mr, Spallino, The Department of Environmental Conservation has received the Notice of Intent (NO[) to seek coverage under the General Permit 3-9030. A ten-day comment period was provided after the NOI submittal. No public comments were received. Enclosed is your copy of an Authorization to Discharge pursuant to General Permit 3.9030, which has been signed by the Stormwater Program Manager on behalf of the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Conservation. This authorizes the discharge of stormwater from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints located on 400 Swift Street in South Burlington, Vermont to Potash Brook. To maintain coverage under General Permit 3-9030, an Engineering Feasibility Analysis must be conducted and submitted to VTDEC in accordance with Appendix A of the permit by June 30, 2011. Please read this Authorization to Discharge carefully and note the terms, conditions and eligibility provisions of General Permit 3-9030. If you have any questions, please call the Stormwater Section at (802) 241-3770. Sincerely, ennifer Callahan Environmental Analyst Stormwater Program To preserve, enhance, restore, and conserve Vermont's natural resources, and protect human health, for the benefit of this and future generations. For g; NOI Nurr 1�`1J� Notice of Intent (NOI) for Designated Discharges Under National Pollution Discharge Elimination General Permit 3-9030 .rN4".VERMOV ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION For Category IV.A and IV.B Stormwater Discharges (Discharges from Residually Designated Sites from property with existing impervious surfaces that are subject to a previously issued state stormwater permit and property with existing impervious surfaces equal to or greater than one acre that do not have a previously issued state stormwater permit.) A. Landowner Information 1.Name:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 2. Mailing Address: a. Street/PO Box: 50 E. North Temple St. b. City/Town: Salt Lake City 3. Contact Information: a. Phone: 802-763-8198 B. Project Information c. State: UT b. Fax: 802-763-8199 } JA;N 26 2010�LJJ vT EWRONII& Z4c_"t6&ATK;N WATER QUAI.Ir!'WIS!ON c. Email:MenderJRaldschurch.org 1. Project Name:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints 2. Is this NOI being submitted in connection with a subdivision (e.g. residential or commercial subdivisions, condominiums and industrial parks)?: ❑ Yes ® No 3. If Yes, Name of Development: 4. Location Address a. Street:400 Swift St. b. City/ Town: South Burlington 5. Name(s) of receiving waters: Potash Brook 6. Existing VTDEC Stormwater Permit Number related to this project (if any): 2# 0179 7. Act 250 Permit Number (if any): Page 1 of 3 Nov 09 C. Certification Rel�..Ag to the Accuracy of the Inform I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my diligent inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system or actions required by this permit, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Landowner Name: Ten Signature: �!- D. Public Notice Requirement Title: Director for Temporal Affairs _ Date: _ ) { �J A-- x o i o You must provide a copy of this completed NOI form to the municipal clerk for posting in the municipality in which the discharge is to be located. If the project and the related discharge(s) are located in different municipalities, then the completed NOI shall be filed with the municipal clerk in each municipality. E. RECORDING REQUIREMENTS UPON ISSUANCE The permittee shall file a copy of this NOI and authorization to discharge in the land records within fourteen (14) days of its Issuance and a copy of the recording shall be provided to the Department within fourteen (14) days of the permittee's receipt of a copy of the recording from the local land records. I For Department Use Only: I AUTHORIZATION VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE A determination has been made that the applicant meets the requirements for coverage under General Permit 3-9030. Subject to the conditions of General Permit No. 3-9030, the applicant is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater runoff as described in this Notice of Intent Number 6310 -9030. This authorization shall continue until November 19, 2014. The permittee shall reapply for coverage at least (60) days prior to the expiration of the permit. #6- A-b4 Dated at Waterbury, Vermont this /o day of ' 20 10 Justin G. Johnson, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By 21 `&i� Pa raic Monks Program Manager, Stormwater Section Page 2 of 3 Nov 09 PUBLIC COMMENT Public comments concerning this Notice of Intent to discharge under General Permit No 3-9030 are invited and must be submitted within 10 days of receipt of the NOI being posted on DEC's stormwater website (www.vtwaterquality.org/stormwater.htm) and on the Agency's Environmental Notice Bulletin (www.anr.state.vt.us/dec/enb/enb.htm). Comments should address how the application complies or does not comply with the terms and conditions of General Permit No. 3-9030. A letter of interest should be filed by those persons who elect not to file comments but who wish to be notified if the comment period is extended ' or reopened for any reason. All written comments received within the time frame described above will be considered by the Department of Environmental Conservation in its final ruling to grant or deny authorization to discharge under General Permit No. 3-9030. Send written comments to: VT Department of Environmental Conservation Water Quality Division, Stormwater Section 103 South Main Street, Building 10 North Waterbury, VT 05671-0408 Please cite the NOI number in any correspondence. APPEALS Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Chapter 220, any appeal of this decision must be filed with the clerk of the Environmental Court within 30 days of the date of the decision. The appellant must attach to the Notice of Appeal the entry fee of $250.00, payable to the state of Vermont. The Notice of Appeal must specify the parties taking the appeal and the statutory provision under which each party claims party status: must designate the act or decision appealed from; must name the Environmental Court; and must be signed by the appellant or their attorney. In addition, the appeal must give the address or location and description of the property, project or facility with which the appeal is concerned and the name of the applicant or any permit involved in the appeal. The appellant must also serve a copy of the Notice of Appeal in accordance with Rule 5(b)(4)(B) of the Vennont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings. For further information, see the Vermont Rules for Environmental Court Proceedings, available on line at www.vermontiudiciary.org. The address for the Environmental Court is 2418 Airport Road, Suite 1, Barre, VT 05641 (Tel. # 802-828-1660). A copy of General Permit No. 3-9030 may be obtained by calling (802) 241-3770; by visiting the Department at the above address between the hours of 7:45 am and 4:30 pm; or by downloading from the Water Quality Division's Web site at www.vtwaterquality.org, j INFORMATION FOR MUNICIPAL CLERK: Title 10 Chapter 47 §1263(b) provides for the public notice of an applicant's intent to discharge stormwater runoff associated with construction activity. Please post this notice and instruction sheet in a conspicuous place for 10 days from the date received. If you have any questions, contact the Water Quality Division of the Department of Environmental Conservation at (802) 241-3770. Please date this below as to when it was posted. Thank -you for your assistance. DATE OF POSTING: r!A OCR , 20 10 Submit Qrlainal Form to: VT DEC, Water Quality Division 103 South Main Street, Bldg 10 North Waterbury, VT, 05671 Page 3 of 3 Nov 09 VENTURES EN URESING �a 'h 208 Flynn Avenue, Suite 2A, Burlington, VT 05401 Tel: 802-863-6225 • Fax: 802-863-6306 85 Mechanic Street, Suite 350A, Lebanon, NH 03766 Tel: 603-442-9333 • Fax: 603-442-9331 December 19, 2014 Mr. Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer South Burlington Planning and Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -Day Saints 400 Swift Street Site Plan Application Dear Mr. Belair, On behalf of our client, please find enclosed a site plan application for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -Day Saints, which is located at 400 Swift Street in South Burlington. The project involves the construction of stormwater management improvements for an existing site. As we explained during a meeting in early November 2014 with you, an approved state stormwater permit was issued for the job on April 4, 2012; however, a site plan application was never filed with the City. Since that time, the preparer of the approved plan (Piascik Engineering) has closed. We have been tasked with taking Piascik Engineering's approved plan and obtaining site plan approval from the City of South Burlington in order to construct the stormwater management improvements. There will be no changes to existing structures or impervious surfaces as part of this application. The following items have been submitted for your review: Five (5) full-size copies of the plans, which consist of: o Sheet 1: "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -Day Saints: South Burlington Stormwater Retrofit — Sheet 1.0- Plans and Details", prepared by Piascik Engineering, dated October 7, 2010. (state -approved stormwater plan) o Sheet 2: "C1.0 — Site Plan for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -Day Saints- Stormwater Improvements", prepared by Engineering Ventures, and dated December 19, 2014. o Sheet 3: "L1.0- Landscape Plan for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -Day Saints- Stormwater Improvements, prepared by Engineering Ventures and Distinctive Landscaping, and dated December 19, 2014: • One (1) reduced -size/ half scale set of plans • One (1) copy of the Application for Site Plan Review and check for $288.00 One (1) copy of the "Findings of Fact & Decision", dated March 18, 1997 7ENGINEERING VENTURES Pc 208 Flynn Avenue, Suite 2A, Burlington, VT 05401 Tel: 802-863-6225 • Fax: 802-863-6306 85 Mechanic Street, Suite 350A, Lebanon, NH 03766 Tel: 603-442-9333 • Fax: 603-442-9331 • One (1) copy of the Authorization of Notice of Intent #6318-9030, dated February 10, 2010. • One (1) copy of an Authorization to Discharge under General Permit 3-9030 Notice of intent No. 6318-9030, dated April 4, 2012. • One (1) copy of a report entitled "Stormwater Retrofit Calculations and Supporting Data- LDS Meetinghouse South Burlington, VT", prepared by Piascik Engineering, and dated October 12, 2010. Please feel free to contact us with any questions or concerns, or if additional materials are needed for your review. Sincer4ly " r. Peter Gibbs, P.E. Vice President Encl. As noted above Distinctive LANDSCAPING 2111 GREENBUSH ROAD CHARLOTTE, VT 05445 802-425-2877 Tuesday, December 09, 2014 Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 "aiiay. Sarah and I met with Craig Lambert this morning to show him the trees and work out what he would like to see happen there. I am writing to propose a method of evaluating the trees that need to be replaced at the Church of Latter Day Saints. 'The trees are generally in poor condition. We graded them from 0-10, with 0 being dead and 10 being perfect. We also had a version of the original site plan and noted trees that are missing from the original site plan. You and 1 had spoken about either replacing them inch for inch or appraising the trees' values and replacing their value dollar for dollar. What seemed to make the most sense was to do a hybrid, which we put on the attached spreadsheet. By this method, we measured and graded each tree and propose the replacement on a tree by tree basis. Before we design the new landscape based on this list of trees, I wanted you to see the procedure and determine' whether or not this is a fair proposal. Sincerely, Charlie Proutt ASLA www.distinctiveIand.com Church of Latter -Day Saints - Storm water improvements Trees to be removed: From east to west on site plan Replacement *GRADING SCALE LATIN NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QUANTITY & SIZE 0 Acer rubrum Red maple 1.5" Cal (1) 2" Cal, Deciduous tree 4 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 4.5" Cal (1) 2" Cal, Deciduous tree 0 Acer rubrum Red maple 1.5" Cal (1) 2" Deciduous tree 0 Missing Quercus Oak (1) 2" Deciduous tree 7 Quercus palustris Pin Oak 11" Cal (4) 2" Deciduous trees 0 Pinus strobus White pine 10" Cal (3) 4-5' Evergreens 0 Pinus strobus White pine 10" Cal (3) 4-5' Evergreens 0 Missing Acer rubrum Maple (1) 2" Cal, DecidUous tree 2 Acer rubrum Red maple 2" Cal (1) 2" Cal, Deciduous tree 1 Acer rubrum Red maple 7" Cal (1) 2" Cal, Deciduous tree 0 Missing Acer rubrum Red maple (1) 2" Cal, Deciduous tree 1 Pinus strobus White pine 7" Cal (3) 4-5' Evergreens *Trees graded from 0 (dead) to 10 (perfect) ,t CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 5th day of February, 2015, a copy of the foregoing public notice for Site Plan Application #SP-15-02, was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject propertyto development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A.§4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) CHENETTE BRADLEY S & LYNDA A 6 CHARLESTOWN GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 SMITH J EDMUND & MONICA J 8 CHARLESTOWN GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 RENECLE DONALD KEITH & LAUREE I 2 ARLINGTON GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 ROSS ELAINE M 4 ARLINGTON GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 LIEBERT DONNA M 6 ARLINGTON GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 ELY LESLEY R 8 ARLINGTON GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 MERALI RIYAZ 10 ARLINGTON GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 PHILIP RANI M & CHERIAN 12 ARLINGTON GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 ERWIN BRUCE 14 ARLINGTON GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 WEIMER BRUCE E & CAROL E LIFE ESTATE 16 ARLINGTON GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 BIDDLE ELLEN I 18 ARLINGTON GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 GRAHAM EDNA M 20 ARLINGTON GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 KAZAK OLIVIA 22 ARLINGTON GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 ROGERS ALVI J & ELIZABETH G 24 ARLINGTON GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 MATHEWS JOAN M REVOCABLE TRUST 26 ARLINGTON GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 ALEXANDER JUDITH 28 ARLINGTON GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 SMITH GILBERT W & BRENDA W 30 ARLINGTON GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 BURT CHRISTINE C & STEVEN N 1 BEDFORD GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 MURRAY FRANCIS X & MARY A 2 BEDFORD GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 BAKEMAN PAUL E & ANNE S LIFE ESTATE 3 BEDFORD GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 MCDOUGAL GERARD C 4 BEDFORD GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 RONDEAU RONALD J & JANE A 5 BEDFORD GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 FITZGERALD PAUL K & ALISON F 6 BEDFORD GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 CAUCHON DOUGLAS A & PAULA J 7 BEDFORD GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 O'CONNOR JR DAVID L 8 BEDFORD GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 SHELTON LAWRENCE G & LAUREN P TRUST 9 BEDFORD GREEN South Burlington VT 05403 JEWETT THEODORE & MINA C 45 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 HARREWYN JOHANNES J & PAMELA A 47 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 MAGNAN JULIE A 56 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 BOUCHER GLORIA W TRUST 57 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 GUYETTE ALEXANDER J JR & BARBARA A 59 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 KOWALSKI LEE J & SUZANNE J 79 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 GUIDULI BARBARA D TRUST 81 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 THALER RAYMOND T & ELIZABETH 82 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 DECKER ANDREA 84 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 SULLIVAN ROGER D & VICKI J 99 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 O'CONNOR ALLISON C 101 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 KRESKY ELLEN 104 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 COLVARD RHONDA 106 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 MITTELBUSHER RICHARD L 121 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 MAGNUS JOHN O 123 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 GROBLER LEON J & PETRONELLA 128 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 JACOBUS WILLIAM N & NANCY H 130 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 FLAHERTY KEVIN M 159 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 DELFOE EDWARD F & MARY JEAN 161 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 KIRKPATRICK MARY G 199 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 LACOUNT LUCILLE 201 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 RAFSKY NANCY E TRUST 203 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 MCGOVERN EDWIN L & SHELIA P TRUST 205 ECONOMOU FARM RD South Burlington VT 05403 Congregation of Temple Sinai South Burlington VT 05403 ERDMANN ROBERT H & CAROL B TRUST 200 Battery Street South Burlington VT 05403 For Economou Farm - Fairway Estates Property Manager Fairway Estates II, c/o Appletree Bay Property Mgmt PO Box 3009 Burlington VT 05408 Dated at Burlington, Vermont, this 5th day of February, 2015. Printed Name: Peter Gibbs �'P Phone number and ee 0'21�3-6225, peterg@engineeringventures.com Signarure — Date: Fe14&y 5, 2015 Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT Monday, January 05, 2015 Peter Gibbs Engineering Ventures 208 Flynn Ave., Suite 2A Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Peter: The trees at the Church of Latter Day Saints on Swift Street are generally in poor condition. The water quality improvement project requires replacement of the affected trees. In the case of dead or missing hardwoods, we are replacing each with a two inch caliper hardwood. We are replacing live trees with multiple trees based on the caliper and health of the live tree. We are replacing the three dead evergreens with nine, four to five foot evergreens. The accompanying charts show tree for tree how we determined a fair replacement, as well as a cost estimate for the replacements. The method used is a result of a consultation on site with Craig Lambert, the city arborist and a discussion and submittal with Ray Belair, the city planner. Sincerely, Charlie Proutt ASLA Church of Latter -Day Saints - Storm water improvements Tree Planting Price Estimate Quantity Botanical Name Common Name Size 4 Acer rubrum Red Mapole 2" cal 5 Quercus bicolor Swamp White Oak 2" cal 4 Ulmus americana Princeton Princeton Elm 2" cal 9 Pinus strobus White Pine 4-5 feet Price Total $600 $ 2,400.00 $600 $ 3,000.00 $600 $ 2,400.00 $200 $ 1,800.00 Total Estimate $ 9,600.00 GRANT -HATCH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Insurance & Bonds January 18, 1999 Mr. Richard Ward, Zoning Administrator City of South Dakota, State of Vermont 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Improvement Bond LDS Church Bond #81453718 Bond Amount: $3,240.00 Dear Mr. Ward: IIndependent lnsnrance Agent, I draw your attention to the above -mentioned bond which comes up for renewal on March 24, 1999. I am automatically renewing the bond per your instructions in a response to my letter dated February 8, 1998 (copy enclosed). Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, uv(�_ Melissa Malin Account Manager MAM/m Encl. P.O. Box 11809 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84147 • (801) 521-7740 447 East First South • Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 • Fax (801) 355-7940 FEB 13 '98 15:07 CITY OF S BURLINGTON GRANT -HATCH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Insuirancc & Bonds " February 8, 1998 City of South Burlington State of Vermont 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Church Impro=nent.Bond Bond #814.53718 Bond Amount: $3,240.00 Dear Sir/Madam: City of South Burlington 67� OORSET STREET SOUTH SURUNOTON. VGg/I(k1T OUQ FAX 85"748 'WRICHARD R. WARD Planning & Zoning Department 658.79SS Or 65&7958 I refer you to the above -mentioned bond which is coming up for renewal on March 24, 1998. I need to know if the bond is needed for another year. the job covers the following: Ensure completion of the landscaping on the project of the Burlington Montpelier Vermont Stake Project No. 500-3547 Please jot your answer on the bottom of this letter. If the job has been completed, please provide me with a letter of release_ i have enclosed a return envelope for your convenience in replying. Feel free to call me if you have any questions. Thank you Sincerely, Melissa Malin Account Manager 744 J/2- f'vz P.O. Box 11809 • Salt Lake City,1447 y "�� Utah 841(gQl) 521-7740 447 East First South - Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 9 Fax (801) 355-7940 ' � DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 13 , 2C% Myrna L. Feyh Grant - Hatch & Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 11809 Salt Lake City, Utah 84147 Re: Bond #8145 - 37 - 18 Release Dear Ms. Feyh: This is in response to your letter of 1/25/00 regarding the above referenced bond. I have recently inspected the property at 400 Swift Street and found that all the landscaping was in place as shown on the approved site plan. Therefore, please release the owner from the obligation of maintaining this bond. Sincerpty, df i R�ymo'nd J. Belair, Administrative Officer RIB/mcp GRANT -HATCH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Insurance & Bonds City of South Burlington, State of Vermont 575 Dorset St South Burlington, VT 05401 Re: Burlington Montpelier Vermont Stake Project # 500-3547 Bond # 8145-37-18 To Whom it May Concern: IAIndependent Insurance go The above referenced bond is due to renew on March 24, 2000. Would you like us to renew this bond? If the project is completed we will need a Release Letter, in order for us to close our file. Jot your answer at the bottom of this letter and return in the enclosed envelope. If you have any questions please give me a call. Thank you. Sincerely, i' X4/ M 'ma L. Feyh Account Manager AA49 P.O. Box 11809 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84147 • (801) 521-7740 447 East First South • Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 9 Fax (801) 355-7940 FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY BOND FOR INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENTS Bond #8145-37-18 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That we, Corporation of the Presidine Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter -Day Saints, A Utah Corporation sole as Principal, and Federal Insurance Company , a Corporation of the State of Indiana , authorized to write surety Bonds in the State of Maryland , as Surety, are jointly and severally held and firmly bound unto City of South Burlington State of Vermont, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont 05401, in the sum of Three Thousand Two Hundred Forty and NO/100 Dollars -------------------------------------------- 3 240.00 lawful money of the United States of America, for which payment well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our executors, administrators' heirs, successors and assigns, jointly and severally by these presents. THE CONDITIONS OF THIS OBLIGATION ARE SUCH THAT, WHEREAS, said Principal has made application to the City of South Burfinglon, State of Vermont for approval and acceptable of a plan to: Ensure completion of the landscaping on the project of the Burlington Montpelier Vermont Stake Project No. 500-3547 WHEREAS, the City of South Burlinglon, State of Vermont has required the Principal as a condition of such approval and acceptance to post bond to: Ensure completion of the landscaping on the project of the Burlington Montpelier Vermont Stake Project No. 500-3547 NOW, THEREFORE, if the said Principal shall furnish, install and complete under the inspection and to the satisfaction of the City of South Burlinglon, State of Vermont and in accordance with the above described specifications, the improvements aforesaid in said subdivision as hereinbefore listed, than this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise, it shall remain in full force and effect. Signed, sealed and dated this March 24, 1997 Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter. -Jay Naints, A Utah Comoration. sole PRINCIPAL �l lky: tea D. Simmo:�s, Ast ed gent Federal Insurance Comnan SURETY By: /�y -- Norman D. Squires, Attorney- in -Fact 447 E. 1 st So., SLC, Utah 84111 State of Utah_ � } ss County of Salt Laka j ry � ww s ca !m � wu w+e .ram s c.a c-1 '" l`Ja,'7PN FL"; 9 a MEIJSSA MAL.`.'� ; 447 East 100 S:Iu'h i Salt LAke City, Utah $4113 My Commililm Expires Deownber 13, 1999 111 Utah et I On March 24, 1997 -,before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public of said county and state, personally appeared '.Norman D. Squires known to me to be the Attorney -in -Fact of , FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY the Corporation that executed the within instrument, and known to me to be the person who executed the said instrument on behalf of the Corporation therein named, and acknowledged to me that such Corporation executed the same. NOTARY PUBLIC GRANT -HATCH & ASSOCIATES, INC. Insurance & Bonds February 8, 1998 City of South Burlington State of Vermont 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: LDS Church Improvement Bond Bond #81453718 Bond Amount: $3,240.00 Dear Sir/Madam: Indepefidol Insurance Agenl I refer you to the above -mentioned bond which is coming up for renewal on March 24, 1998. 1 need to know if the bond is needed for another year. The job covers the following: Ensure completion of the landscaping on the project of the Burlington Montpelier Vermont Stake Project No. 500-3547 Please jot your answer on the bottom of this letter. If the job has been completed, please provide me with a letter of release. I have enclosed a return envelope for your convenience in replying. Feel free to call me if you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, -ells Ap e Melissa Malin Account Manager /)? J %�'%�•�-K- MAM/m P.O. Box 11809 • Salt Lake City, Utah 84147 0 (01 � � y (Srdl) 521-7740 447 East First South a Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 • Fax (801) 355-7940 POWER OF ATTORNEY FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY ATTN: SURETY DEPARTMENT 15 Mountain View Road, Warren, NJ 07059 Telephone: (908) 903-2000 Fax No.: (908) 903-3656 Know all Men by these Presents, That FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana Corporation, has constituted and appointed, and does hereby constitute and appoint Norman D. Squires, Richard G. Taylor, Mary B. Cristaudo and Roger B. Ricks of Salt Lake City, Utah ----------------------------------------------- each its true and lawful Attorney -in -Fact to execute under such designation in its name and to affix its corporate seal to and deliver for and on its behalf as surety thereon or otherwise, bonds of any of the following classes, to -wit: 1. Bonds and Undertakings (other than Bail Bonds) filed in any suit, matter or proceeding in any Court, or filed with any Sheriff or Magistrate, for the doing or not doing of anything specified in such Bond or Undertaking. 2. Surety bonds to the United States of America or any agency thereof, including those required or permitted under the laws or regulations relating to Customs or Internal Revenue; License and Permit Bonds or other indemnity bonds under the laws, ordinances or regulations of any State, City, Town, Village, Board or other body or organization,. public or private; bonds to Transportation Companies, Lost Instrument Bonds; Lease Bonds, Workers' Compensation Bonds, Miscellaneous Surety Bonds and bonds on behalf of Notaries Public, Sheriffs, Deputy Sheriffs and similar public officials. 3. Bonds on behalf of contractors in connection with bids, proposals or contracts. In Witness Whereof, the said FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY has, pursuant to its By -Laws, caused these presents to be signed by its Vice President and Assistant Secretary and its corporate seal to be hereto affixed this 13 th day of July 19 95 vwsistant Secretary STATE OF NEW JERSEY I ss. County of Somerset FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY BY Gerardo G. Mauriz Vice President On this 13 Lh day of July 19 95, before me personally came Kenneth C. Wendel to me known and by me known to beAssistant Secretary of FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing Power of Attorney, and the said Kenneth C. Wendel being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that he is Assistant Secretaryof FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and knows the corporate seal thereof; that the seal affixed to the foregoing Power of Attorney is such corporate seal and was thereto affixed by authority of the By -Laws of said Company, and that he signed said Power of Attorney as Assistant Secretary of said Company by like authority; and that he is acquainted with Gerardo G. Mauriz and knows him to be the Vice President of said Company, and that the signature of said Gerardo G. Mauriz subscribed to said Power of Attorney is in the genuine handwriting of said Gerardo G. Mauriz and was thereto subscribed by authority of said By - Laws and in deponent's presence. Notarial eal Acknowledged and Sworn to before me I on the date above written. Notary Public IN THE EVENT YOU WISH TO NOTIFY US OF A CLAIM, VERIFY THE AUTHENTICITY OF THIS BOND OR NOTIFY US OF ANY OTHER MATTER, PLEASE WRITE TO US AT THE ADDRESS LISTED ABOVE. Forth 15-10-0134 (Rev. 5-94) GENERAL LINDA SA\YCHAK tdofmty Pv�>Iic, �r,aM of Pilaw Jersey Pam. �O'i3;:2 Commission Expires July 29, 199d CERTIFICATION STATE OF NEW JERSEY l ss. County of Somerset f I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, do hereby certify that the following is a true excerpt from the By -Laws of the said Company as adopted by its Board of Directors and that this By -Law is in full force and effect. "ARTICLE XVIII. Section 2. All bonds, undertakings, contracts and other instruments other than as above for and on behalf of the Company which it is authorized by law or its charter to execute, may and shall be executed in the name and on behalf of the Company either by the Chairman or the Vice Chairman or the President or a Vice President, jointly with the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary, under their respective designations, except that any one or more officers or attorneys -in -fact designated in any resolution of the Board of Directors or the Executive Committee, or in any power of attorney executed as provided for in Section 3 below, may execute any such bond, undertaking or other obligation as provided in such resolution or power of attorney. Section 3. All powers of attorney for and on behalf of the Company may and shall be executed in the name and on behalf of the Company, either by the Chairman or the Vice Chairman or the President or a Vice President or an Assistant Vice President, jointly with the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary, under their respective designations. The signature of such officers may be engraved, printed or lithographed. The signature of each of the following officers: Chairman, Vice Chair- man, President, any Vice President, any Assistant Vice President, any Secretary, any Assistant Secretary and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any power of attorney or to any certificate relating thereto appointing Assistant Secretaries or Attorneys -in -Fact for purposes only of executing and attesting bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and any such power of attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such power so executed and certified by such facsimile signa- ture and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached." I further certify that said FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY is duly licensed to transact fidelity and surety business in each of the States of the United States of America, District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and each of the Provinces of Canada with the exception of Prince Edward Island; and is also duly licensed to become sole surety on bonds, undertakings, etc., permitted or required by the law. I, the undersigned Assistant Secretary of FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, do hereby certify that the foregoing Power of Attorney is now in full force and effect. Given under my hand and the seal of said Company at Warren, N.J., this 24th day of Marc`. 19 97 Corporate Seal j Assistant Secretary ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ STATE OF UTAH ) COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) �1f On this day of 1997, personally appeared before me TED D. SIMMONS , personally known known to me to be an Authorized Agent of the Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, who acknowledged to me that he signed the foregoing instrument as an Authorized Agent for the Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, a Utah corporation sole, and the said TED D. SIMMONS acknowledged to me that the said C rporation executed the same. 1 , N{AWN o- 45tt BOxek%r Street My commission expires: t = Murray. Utah 84107 �. October 30. 1998 tary Public in and for the State of Utah At �` Commission �" October 30 1 .�&j 11 Marvin S. Harding ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................: RECEIVED CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY O E C 2 9 1995 uun u,v. of Corp. Comm Code I, H. DAVID BURTON, do hereby certify that I am the Presiding Bishop of THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, a religious association, and by virtue of such office I am the Corporation Sole of the CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, a Corporation Sole, organized under the laws of the State of Utah; that I am the person designated in the Articles of Incorporation of said Corporation Sole to sign and execute the deeds and other instruments of writing and to transact all of the business of said Corporation Sole, pursuant to the provision of Title 16, Chapter 7, Section 8, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended; and that pursuant to said Section 16-7-8 thereof, I hereby designate and name TED D. SB4MONS as an agent empowered to execute on behalf of said Corporation Sole: 1) Documents relating to the purchase, sale, development, use, improvement, taxation, encumbrance and release thereof, or other disposition of real property. 2) Certain corporate documents, namely, annual reports, stock and bond powers, proxies, water stock certificates, and franchise tax forms. 3) Miscellaneous documents, such as agreements, promissory notes, bills of sale, assignments, loan participation agreements, petitions, notices, and reports. 0''' ,r at Salt Lake City,Utah this 29th day of December, 1995. Cs irRnt 1* of rTi Y 4NW 4 *r 1rO 10?4 to Commaralal C040 i H}r!b aortlf� the oln� n l shl "ad ortrt t��day o Ita th1 a or thlj v on and Firs-Ey u• this cWtiockto thurof. Imminac�� ouv� J - e5 KORLA T. WOODS DivWon Director CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, A Corporation Sole UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) STATE OF UTAH : SS. COUNTY OF SALT LAKE ) H. DAVID BLTTON, Corporation Sole do the 29th day of December, 1995, personally appeared before me H. DAVID BURTON, personally known to me to be the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, who duly acknowledged that he signed the foregoing instrument as Corporation Sole of the CORPORATION OF THE PRESIDING BISHOP OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, and that the seal impressed on the within instrument is the seal of said Corporation, and the said H. DAVID BURTON acknowledged to me that said Corporation executed the same. My commission expires: i.'yam-..•—�: r, 1 1 j �7t MARYLYNN H. PACE 60 East South Temple. N1a00 i NOTARY P LI in and for the State of Utah, residing in Salt Lake City, Utah City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 April 1, 1997 David Luce 83 South Main Street Waterbury, Vermont 05676 Re: Parking Lot Alterations, 400 Swift Street Dear Mr. Luce: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the March 11, 1997 Planning Commission meeting minutes and the approved Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please JW/mcp 2 Encls give me a call. S� erely Jo Weith, Ci y Planner PLANNING COMMISSION 11 March 1997 page 4 8. The _aoeiicant_shall_obtain_a_Certificate_of_Occupancy/Compli` a_n_c_efro_m the Administrative_ Officer_orior_to_use_of_the add 9. Any_changes_to_the _site plan_shall_reguire_approval_by_the South_ Burlington_Planninq_Commission. Ms. Barone_secondedi__Motion_passed_unanimously_ 5. Site plan application of David Luce to amend a previously ap- proved site plan for a 275 seat church. The amendment consists of modifications to the parking area, 400 Swift Street: Mr. Luce said they will pave over a grassed island, but since that will bring them over the allowable coverage, they will strike off a piece of parking lot on the east side which is not needed. This won't result in the loss of any spaces. This will result in no change in lot coverage. Regarding landscaping, over the years they have lost some trees along the northern boundary. They propose to replace what is missing from the 1983 application and add some around the per- imeter of the building. No issues were raised by the Commission. Mr. Crow moved the Planning Commission aoorove_the site _Plan _ap plication_ofDavid Luce to amend_ a_ore_viously_aDoroved site flan for a_275 seat_ch_urc_h._ The amendme_nt_consists of _mo_difica_tio_ns_ to�the _Parkinq_area,_400_Swift_ Street,_ as_ depicted_ on_a_four paq set of Plans,_Page_one_entitled_:'Existin�_Conditions_and_Demol_ 9tion Plan="_Prepared_ by_Engineerinq_Ventures, Inc, dated_1/10/ 97. last revised 3/10/997, with the following_stioulations:� 1. All previous and _stipulations _which are _not _supfL seded_by_this_ approval_ shall_ remain_ in effect. 2. For the _Purpose_of calculating road_ im+p� fees_under_the Southur _Blington_Impact_Fee_Ordinance, the_Planninnq_ Commission estimates that t_he_parkinq_lot _modifications _ will generate_ zero additional _vehicle_trio_ends_durinq_the_Pim. peak hour. 3. The applicant_ shall_ post _a_$3240_landscape bond _Prior _to issuance _of_a zoninq_permit`__The_ bond_ shall_ remain_ in_effect_for three_ years_ to_ assure _that _the_landscaping_takes_root_and_has _a good chance_ of_ surviving. 4. Any_new_exterior_lightinq_shall_ consist_ of_downcasting shielded fixtures _so as not to_ cast_light_beyond_the_Propert lined Any change in_lightinq_shall_be_aporoved_by_the_City PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MARCH 1997 page 5 Planner_p ior_to_installation_ 5. The applicant_shall_obtain_a_zoning_permit_ within_ six_ months pursuant_to_Section_27.302_of_the _zoning_regulations_or_this aooroval_is_null _and _void. 6__The__applic_a_nt__ shall _obtain a Certificate of_Occupancy/Compli- ance from the Administrative_officer_prior to`use of the modem ified_earkinq_area. 7. Any_changes_to_the_site_plan_shall_reouire_aooroval_by_ the South_ Burlington_Planninq_Commission. Mr. Dinklage_ seconded. __Motion_passed_unanimously: 6. Site plan application of Green Tree Park, Inc, to construct a 14,100 sq. ft. warehouse building on a 1.66 acre lot, 6 Green Tree Drive: Mr. Desmond said the building will be constructed of split block face. Lot #6's use will move over and occupy the full building space. No issues were raised by the Commission. Mr. Crow moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan ap- plication of Green Tree Park, Inc, to construct a 14,100 sq. ft. warehouse building on a 1.66 acre lot, 6 Green Tree Drive, as de- picted on a five page set of plans, page one entitled "Lot 7 Green Tree Park South Burlington Vermont," prepared by Trudell Consulting Engineers, Inc, dated 10/13/89, last revised 1/9/97, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not super- seded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The Commission grants a sewer allocation of 300 gpd. The applicant shall pay the per gallon fee prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 3. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $10,900 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 4. All new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installations. Memorandum - Planning March 11, 1997 agenda items March 7, 1997 Page 7 10. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. 4) BLS PROPERTIES - MEDICAL OFFICE ADDITION - SITE PLAN This application was continued from the February 25, 1997 meeting to provide the applicant time to revise the site plan to add existing landscaping information and show the individual parking spaces. Staff's February 25, 1997 memo is enclosed for your review. Landscaping: The site plan has been revised to show the existing and proposed landscaping. The plan is still $950 short of the minimum landscaping requirement of $3600. The plan should be revised to meet the minimum landscaping requirement. Parking: The plan shows 211 existing parking spaces and six (6) new spaces for a total of 217 parking spaces. This represents a 28 space shortfall from the 245 spaces required for the property. The applicant's proposed addition requires six (6) spaces which are being added. In 1987 the Commission approved a large expansion to the medical office building. The approved plan indicated that there were 147 existing and 83 new spaces for a total of 230 spaces. The plan did not show the existing spaces, only the new spaces to be added. Apparently, the existing 147 spaces were never verified. In a recent inspection of the site, it appears that 10 of the 83 spaces which were proposed to be added in 1987 never were built. Staff recommends that these 10 spaces also be constructed as part of this application. 5) DAVID LUCE - PARKING LOT ALTERATIONS - SITE PLAN This project consists of amending a previously approved site plan for a 275 seat church. The amendment consists of modifications to the parking area. The last review of this property by the Commission was on 6/28/83 (minutes enclosed). 7 Memorandum - Planning March 11, 1997 agenda items March 7, 1997 Page 8 This property located at 400 Swift Street lies within the R2 and C.O. Districts. It is bounded on the east by a church, on the north and west by the Ridgewood residential development, and on the south by Swift Street. Access/circulation: Access is provided by a 26 foot curb cut on Swift Street. No changes proposed. Access on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Building coverage is 13% (maximum allowed is 20%). Overall coverage is 50% (maximum allowed is 40%). This is an existing situation which will not be made worse by this application. Pavement will be removed along the northerly boundary to compensate for the green island being removed in the parking lot�~�' so there will be no increase in overall coverage. Front yard coverage is 8.5% (maximum allowed is 30%). Setback requirements are met. Parking: A total of 92 spaces are required and 118 spaces including five (5) handicapped spaces and a bike rack will be provided. Landscaping: No additional landscaping, based on building costs, is required. Plan shows existing landscaping in addition to landscaping that was required in the 6/28/83 approval which was never planted. The proposed landscaping has a value of $3240. Traffic: No additional traffic will be generated. Dumpster: The existing dumpster storage area will be screened. Lighting: Exterior lighting consists of: --- eight (8) 250 watt high pressure sodium lamps with downcasting shielded fixtures mounted on 20 foot poles. --- six ( 6 ) building mounted flood lights will be replaced with 50 watt high pressure sodium lamps. l� T K:� r' MOTION OF APPROVAL DAVID LUCE 3/11/97 I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of David Luce to amend a previously approved site plan for a 275 seat church. The amendment consists of modifications to the parking area, 400 Swift Street, as depicted on a four (4) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled "Existing Conditions and Demolition Plan," prepared by Engineering Ventures Inc., dated 1/10/97, last revised 3/10/97, with the following stipulations. 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the parking lot modifications will generate zero (0) additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 3. The applicant shall post a $3240 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 4. Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 5. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 6. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the modified parking area. 7. Any changes to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. I ) 3/11/97 '0 MOTION OF APPROVAL DAVID LUCE I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application of David Luce to amend a previously approved site plan for a 275 seat church. The amendment consists of modifications to the parking area, 400 Swift Street, as depicted on a four (4) page set of plans, page one (1) entitled "Existing Conditions and Demolition Plan," prepared by Engineering Ventures Inc., dated 1/10/97, last revised 3/10/97, with the following stipulations. 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the parking lot modifications will generate zero (0) additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 3. The applicant shall post a $3240 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 4. Any new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. 5. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit within six (6) months pursuant to Section 27.302 of the zoning regulations or this approval is null and void. 6. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to use of the modified parking area. 7. Any changes to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION JUNTE 28, 1983 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, June 28, 1983, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present Sidney Poger, Chairman; Judy Hurd, John Belter, William Burgess, George Mona, Mary Barbara Maher, Peter Jacob Others Present David Spitz, Planner; Ronald C. Schmucker, Bryant H. Gile, David Luce, V. H. Naramore, Rosemary Naramore, Constance Snyder, R. Cannizzari, B. A. V,,nyush, Robert Haynes, Sheun C. Poon, Dean Hoy, Paul Ode, David Arnold, Sol Lewin; Ruth Poger, The Other Paper Minutes of June 14, 1983 Mr. Poger noted that on page 2, the rescheduling of the site plan of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints should include the words "at 7:30 pm, at City Hall." He also noted that in the next -to -the -last paragraph on page 5, the desig- nation "a 2 acre area within a 5 acre develppment" should read "a .2 acre area...." Mrs. Maher then moved that the Minutes of June 14, 1983 be approved as amended. Mr. Mona seconded. The motion was passed 6-0 with Mr. Burgess abstaining. Continuation of site Zlan application by Church of Jesus Christ o Latter Day Saints for an 8200 square foot addition at 400 wi t Street Mr. Spitz noted that the revised site plan shows more detailed landscaping and also shows a single 24' wide drive, as requested by the Commission. He said the administration has no further problems with the plan. Mrs. Maher moved that the South Burlin-aton Planning Commission approve the site plan application by the Churoh of Latter Da Saints for an addition at 400 Swift Street as depicted on two plans: "Site P an" pre2ared by David Luce Architect, stamped 8 and "P antin Pan" re ared David uce. Architect. last revised with the ollowina stip- ulations: 1) A landscaping bond of $16,Q00 shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. 2) This approval expires in 6 months. If connection to the City sewer is unable to be proved by the City Manage 77hin at time ten the site plan application must be resubmitted. . Be ter seconded the motion. Mr. Mona questioned the wording of the second stipulation and P.% Jinn 23, 1` 83 it was agreed to eliminate the second sentence, duly noting that there may be a problem with getting a hook-up within the 6-month period. If a hook-up is not possible in that time, the site plan must be resubmitted. In the vote that followed the motion passed 5-0 with Messrs. Burgess and Jacob abstaining. Site plan application by Ira Tate & C.W. Gregory for a pet sho and industrial building at 30bO Williston Road In presenting a slide of the area, Mr. Spitz advised that the junk cars on the site will be removed as will one small storage building. The two front buildings will be removed within five years and the front will be closed up to some extent. Mr. Schmucker, representing the applicant, explained that Mr. Tate intends to move his present pet shop to the site and to locate a kennel in the basement of the new building. He will reduce the number of animals in the kennel from 100 to"about 50. The new building will be approximately 15,600 sq. ft. He explained that as a condition of sale, Mr. Tate must lease back the present building to the Imported Car people for a period of 5 years. After they vacate, the building will be removed. The new building will be directly behind the old structure. He noted that some time in the future, they would like to build another building at the back of the lot. Sewer usage will be small, probably less than 2.00 gallons per day. It was noted that Mr. Szvmanski had approved the applicant's for inclusion on the sewer line, thereby jumping these waiting in line. Mr. Poger questeioned whether the fact that one's sewage use would be minimal gave them the right to jump to the head of the line. Mr. Spitz said that they haven't even been figuring in such small sewage use. For some applicants who al- ready have sewage use that will not increase significantly, ap- proval has also been granted. In polling the members, only Mr. Burgess felt that all appli- cants should have to take their turn in line. Mr. Poger felt jumping ahead was acceptable if it was an expansion of an ex- isting use. Mrs. Maher felt that if there is deviation from the rule, there should be a standard to determine the gallonage for those who will not be required to wait in line. Mr. Mona said he felt that should be left to the administration to de- termine on a case by case basis. Mr. Spitz noted that they are asking for a 6 foot wide strip in anticipation of the widening of Williston Road. He also noted that Mr. Szymanski had requested a 5 foot strip at the western side of the lot for snow dumping. Mr. Poger noted he would be uncomfortable with setting up a driveway so much off - center. Mr. Schmucker said they would prefer to eliminate the 5 foot strip and to guarantee that there will be no snow stor- age against the western fence. Mr. Spitz said it would also be possible to narrow the drive to 30 feet and reduce the offset. Mr. Schmucker said that would be agreeable. No Text City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 March 7, 1997 David Luce 83 South Main Street Waterbury, Vermont 05676 Re: Parking Lot Alterations, 400 Swift Street Dear Mr. Luce: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, March 11, 1997 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, j6k � Joe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp Encls 1 ......... . . C&I �i DAVI D LUCE ARCHITECT RC_ AIA 83 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VERMONT 05676-[8021 244-7841 5 March 1997 Mr Raymond Belair Zoning & Planning Assistant City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 RE: LDS Church, 400 Swift St. Dear Mr Belair, Enclosed, as promised, is the revised landscape plan. As you can see, it is now shows both the existing items and the proposed new landscaping to fill in where the previous project "shortchanged" things somewhat. I have not shown all the items planned for the prior project only because the satelite dish location does not allow for plantings in that immediate area. I have tried to put some additional plantings in some other locations. The property line to the north was really deficient and I have filled that in considerably. Please note that I am also including a catalog cut of a bike rack that I have located near the existing storage building and have also shown details for the fenced and gated enclosure to surround the existing dumpster pad. 4'ce e1y, David Luce, AIA 1 11 rk DETAIL_ GIL'tiI►/11WV1=14 IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS COLORS (Painting/Coating)—Painting or coating the rack will result in a maintenance problem, as no coating will withstand the abuse of the bicycles. Powder coating cannot be maintenanced, an enamel finish will chip. A A A RIBBON°' Rack Co. has the best solution where color is essential. Please contact us to find out how to achieve an appropriate color with a minimum of maintenance. MATERIALS —Steel tubing or aluminum are not suitable materials for a bicycle rack. Pre -galvanized material will flake and crack during manufac- ture. A A A RIBBONT Rack Co. uses heavy-duty steel pipe, hot -dipped gal- vanized after fabrication to provide security and durability. MANUFACTURE —Hydraulic bending with a mandril, as used by A A A RIBBON" Rack Co., insures smooth and aesthetic curves on The RIBBON" Rack. Press bending leaves an indentation; other methods flatten outer curves and crimp inner curves. HA( "IF IT'S NOT AN ORIGINAL `RIBBON' RACK, IT'S NOT AN —95/81 -I I I ( 327/8„ 2, cm 83.5 SURFACE FLANGE rr MOUNT Model Number # of Bicycles Rack Length RB 05 5 38.375" 97.5 cm RB 07 7 62.375" 158.4 cm RB 09 9 86.375" 219.4 cm RB 11 11 110.375" 280.4 cm General `RIBBON' and the Brandir International Inc. logo are trademarks of Brandir International Inc. used exclusively by A A A RIBBON" Rack Co. Delivery time: Six weeks or sooner from receipt of order. For prices and information contact: A A A RIBBONS Rack Co. Division of: BRANDIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. 521 Fifth Avenue, 17th floor New York, NY 10175 USA 212-505-6500 FAX:212-505-6813 Specifications All standard units made from: ASTM A53 SCHEDULE 40 steel pipe (2.375" OD x .154 wall), hydraulically bent with a mandril; hot -dipped' galvanized after fabrication. Installation methods: inground anchor mount (standard) freestanding mount I (optional & surface flange mount j extra) The RIBBON, RACK is available in ASTM A312 SCHEDULE 40 TP 304 stainless steel, satin #4 finish (optional and extra). INGROUND`' ANCHOR MOUI Please Use I Quantity I RIB fps (411� In .,� DRAWN BY 0 C.R.H. � CNECKIiU BY D.W.B. -o 0 _ _ ___ ---_----_--_--_—_—_--_--_--_--------- -- —__— ---- ------ _ _ ^-- � 11 i SWIFT STREET I 1 - u � u n D U O 00000000 O p N. z R z _d z 0rri IIIii �a 4m Ph v ®i r�� A Z = q SHEET TITLE ARCHITECT DAVID LUCE ARCHITECT PC THE CHURCH of JESUS CHRIST xi�vxsioxs 83 So. MAIN ST. WATERBURY, VT. 05676 tM J) OB6ML � EXISTING CONDITIONS CIVIL/ ENGINEERING VENTURES INC. OF LATTER—DAY SAINTS STRUCTURAL 7 RILBURN ST.. BURLINGTON. VT, 05401 AND DEMOLITION PLAN MECHANICAL/ AVENGCO, LTD BURLINGTON/ESSEX WARD �j� ELECTRICAL 83 So. MAIN ST.. WATERBURY. VT. 05676 MONTPE •ERMONT STAKE V+ FR p17 .711 z- B' 2'-0' RM 10 RAN D� I3 '• 5AVM NWIE MOBBII X _ 111 1t" 11- 11' ii" pm figg ' �a FR B' 5" SUB B- 5" STAB e � e � � F t alag cI r s-o• r Y Y N -• m � -. � _ h r 1 Is oil aOrQ 0 ,y DRAWN BY SHEET TITLE ARCHITECT DAVID LUCE ARCHITECT PC THE CHURCH of JESUS CHRIST REVISIONS 83 So. MAIN ST, WATERBURY, VT. 05678 C.R.H. OF t-m-n, QMK ,l z PROPOSED �I��/ ENGINEERING VENTURES INC. OTTER —DAY SAINTS CIIECKEO OY SITE DETAILS STRUCTURAL 7 I�.DURN ST., BURLINGTON, VT. 05401 BURL NGTON/ESSEX WARD 4 `" D.W.B. MECHANICAL/ LAVENGcTE LTD MONTPET VERMONT STAKE V 83 So. MAIN ST.. WATERBURY. VT. 05676 The Caretaker low wattage lighting fixture deliv- ers excellent energy efficiency and superior light distribution. Designed to replace expensive, inefficient incandescent lamps, the Caretaker's 105� high-tech styling is perfect for homes, apart- ments/townhouses, office buildings, hotels and other residential or commercial applications requiring night -long security. The Caretaker's polycarbonate construction makes it virtually impervious to corrosion and its , unique labor saving design makes ceiling or wall mount installation easy. A pivoting reflector and rotating lens make final beam adjustment accu- M rate, fast and simple. 83A11 - . 93A11 - Design Features Rotatable Polycarbonate Prismatic Lens Vacuum Metallized Specular Reflector Snap -fit Built-in Latches O-Ring Lens Gasket 35 or 50 Watt HPS Lamp Medium Screw Base Pulse Rated Porcelain Socket Ratchet Type Aiming Polycarbonate Ballast Housing and Main Body of Unit Control tional Internal Photoelectric Polycarbonate Removable Back Plate Quick, Simple Installation Labor-saving design that's easy to install in new con- struction or in retrofit applications using existing junction boxes. Requires no accessory hardware for mounting. Application Flexibility Replaces incandescents or other HID fixtures where a smaller HID light is desired. Can be ceiling mounted or wall mounted horizontally or vertically. Aimable Beam Design features pivoting reflector and rotating lens to make final beam adjust- ment accurate, fast and simple. Photometrics Energy Savings High Performance Based on 12" Mounting Height All units are equipped with energy -efficient high The 50-watt HPS lamp provides 15% more light mw Caretaker pressure sodium lamps which cut energy costs than the two 150-watt PAR lamps it replaces - 2-15OW par Lamps as much as 80% when compared to conven- and has an average life span of 6 1/2 years. tional PAR Fixtures. 60 54 y 46 42 36 Y4 YP � m 30 24 :0 1s 12 m 6 0 J 0 Caretaker SOW HPS Mounting Height 10 Caretaker 12 50W HPS 15 Minimum Footcandle Level .5 FC .2 FC A B A B 40 20 70 35 48 24 60 30 36 18 70 35 Cost and Performance Analysis 1 Caretaker 50W HPS replaces 1 Caretaker 35W HPS replaces 2 PAR 150 lampholders 2 PAR 75 lampholders 2 PAR 1 Caretaker 2 PAR 1 Caretaker Cost Analysis 1508 5OW HPS 759 35W HPS Kilowatt Input...................................................................................... .300 .060 .150 .043 X Energy Charge per Kilowatt Hour.........................................................$ .07 $ .07 $ .07 $ .07 X Annual Burning Hours......................................................................... 3650 3650 3650 3650 = Annual Energy Cost.............................................................................$ 76.75 $15.33 $38.33 $10.99 Lamp Cost..........................................................................................$ 10.00 $20.00 $10.00 $20.00 + Lamp Change Labor...........................................................................$ 10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 X Annual Burning Hours......................................................................... 3650 3650 3650 3650 Lamp Life-Hours.................................................................................. 2000 24,000 2000 16,000 = Annual Lamp Replacement Cost..........................................................$ 36.50 $ 4.56 $36.50 $ 6.84 Annual Energy Cost.............................................................................$ 76.75 $15.33 $36.50 $10.99 + Annual Lamp Replacement Cost..........................................................$ 36.50 $ 4.56 $36.50 $ 6.84 = Annual Operating Cost........................................................................$113.25 $19.89 $74.83 $17.83 Performance Analysis Initial Lumens...................................................................................... 3460 4000 1500 2250 InputWatts.......................................................................................... 300 60 150 43 Lumens per Watt ................................................................................. 11.53 66.66 10.00 52.33 Lamp Changes per Year...................................................................... 1.83 .15 1.83 .23 Ordering Information Lamp Lamp Ballast Net Wt. Volume Catalog Number Type Wattage Type Voltage Distribution (Lbs.) (Cu. Ft.) HPCT-35-12OV-LL HPS 50 React. 120 II MSCO 13 1/ctn. HPCT-50-12OV-LL HPS 70 React. 120 II MSCO 15 3.5 Options (add as suffix) Accessories (order separately) PE Internal Photocontrol. Factory installed. UMB Universal Mounting Box A Aiming Lock HC Hook and Cable Lumark Lighting P.O. Box 824 Vicksburg, Mississippi 39181 601.638.1522 Fax 601.634.9606 ATCOOPER LIGHTING COOPER INDUSTRIES ADH910011 �i DAVID LUCE ARCHITECT RC. AIA 83 SOUTH MAIN STREET WATERBURY, VERMONT 05676-(802) 244-7841 18 February 1997 Mr Raymond Belair Zoning & Planning Assistant City of So. Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, VT 05403 RE: LDS Church, 400 Swift St. Dear Mr Belair, Thanks for your speedy response on the application. I want to keen the process moving so we can clear the way for advertising this project for an early spring start. I hope the enclosed information will help. I have asked Dave Boehm's office to provide you with the answers to the first, second, and fourth comments oil your list. That should be forthcoming this week. My input is as follows: - Seating capacity of the church is 275. - Attached are catalog cuts for the -replacement building mounted floodlight fixture. Please note the bulb is 50W replacing existing 150W and that at a mounting height of 15, throws a .2FC light level only 351. - Enclosed is a plan showing at least a close approximation of the existing landscape planting. I can find no record of the 1983 landscape plan, but am willing to stipulate that this project will include enough new plantings to fill in for the ones eliminated from the original. plan. It would certainly help if I could obtain from your files a copy of that plan so that T can duplicate a copy with which to prepare a plan for your review. - I am preparing a detail for a dumpster enclosure and a search for a bike rack the details for both of which I will forward prior to 2/28. ce ely, David puce, AIA PLANNER 658-7955 City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 February 13, 1997 David Luce 83 South Main Street Waterbury, Vermont 05676 Re: Parking Lot Alterations, 400 S-o� Street Dear Mr. Luce: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans no later than Friday, February 28, 1997. If you are able to respond sooner, you may be placed on the February 25th agenda instead of the March llth agenda. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, i Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp M E M O R A N D U M To: Applicants/Project Files From: Raymond J. Belair, South Burlington Planning & Zoning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, March 11, 1997 Agenda Items Date: February 13, 1997 DAVID LUCE - PARKING LOT ALTERATIONS - SITE PLAN --- plan should show the limits of Conservation & Open Space District along drainageway (50 feet from centerline). --- plan should show three (3) additional handicapped spaces, a total of five ( 5 ) handicapped spaces are required ( see Section 26.253(a)). --- provide maximum seating capacity in church (for parking calculation). --- site plan should include property line dimensions. --- the six (6) building mounted flood lights should be replaced with downcasting shielded fixtures. --- the site plan should be revised to show all existing landscaping. It appears that not all the landscaping required as part of the 1983 approval for the addition was planted. If this is so, the missing landscaping will have to be planted as part of this application. --- the plan should show the dumpster storage area screened and the type of screening noted on the plan. --- a bike rack should be provided as required by Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. GREEN TREE PARK, INC. - WAREHOUSE - SITE PLAN --- provide gross floor area devoted to office space, number of non -office employees and number of company vehicles operating from the premises (for parking calculation). --- provide front yard coverage informaiton. --- plan should include street address: 6 Green Tree Drive. --- provide details (cut -sheets) for any building mounted exterior lights. --- the dumpster should be screened from the adjoining property to the north. --- the applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is approximately $1800. --- staff recommends that the Maple trees be increased in size to a minimum of 2? inch caliper. M E M O R A N D U M To: Joe Weith, South Burlington City Planner From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: Plans Reviewed for March 11, 1997 Date: February 12, 1997 1. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints 400 Swift Street Acceptable Dated 2/10/97 M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: March 11, 1997 Agenda Items Date: February 13, 1997 LOT 7, GREEN TREE PARK - GREEN TREE DRIVE 1. Water shut off valve to building shall be within public r.o.w. Plans shows it within the lot. It should be moved or a easement given to the City around it. 2. Drainage pipe material should be plastic or concrete not metal as plan shows. LATTER DAY SAINTS CHURCH - SWIFT STREET Site plan prepared by David Luce architect dated 1/10/97 is acceptable. 1 � CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE PLAN APPLICATION 1) OWNER OF RECORD (name, address, phone �Z �.�� -2 J�7 Arri , dAr Cie . 2) APPLICANT ( name, address, phone A 3) CONTACT PERSON (name, address, phone fit 2 e3 J(G e �eW , aLe 2) zf 4) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 5) LOT NUMBER (if applicable) 6) PROPOSED USE (S) CAuy,--�alcej zV t&A�ff 7) SIZE OF PROJECT maximum height and (i.e. total building square footage, # units, # floors, square feet per floor) A,0 A-e-v 4,e,, y C~7Wcvj#jq 8) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES /NLiA 9) LOT COVERAGE: building __Z,� 76; landscaped areas 50 % building, parking, outside storage ¢ �tto7�e 7 )�47' Yf co vc�tac.� B, 5� . 10) COST ESTIMATES: Buildings $ �-" , Landscaping Other Site Improvements (please list witf; o ) $ U25 ,000 /*c� � lt* a X-- �, IE D � `!J o7"?.,wer�7 $vyr� S� f,. �✓ ._ o �rG✓lN�,fc -6(� t 11) ESTIMATE PRD OJE COMPL TI N DATE: /1, 7 12) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAI Y TAFFIC (in and out) Estimated trip ends (in and out) during the following hours: Monday through Friday 11-12 noon 12-1p.m. 1-2 p.m. 2-3 p.m. 3-4 P.M. 4-5 p.m. 5-6 p.m. 6-7 p.m. 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: cS�✓�'o�"J - �L I"" vl '�` G'`P'Pt't'"t/ 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: 6 DATE OF SUBMISSION DATE OF HEARING SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT PLEASE SUBMIT FIVE COPIES AND ONE REDUCED COPY (11 X 17 ) OF THE SITE PLAN WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Lot drawn to scale (20 foot scale if possible). Location of streets, abutting properties, fire hydrants, existing buildings, existing landscaping.,' Existing and proposed curb cuts, pavement, W/alkways. Proposed landscaping plan (number, varie and size) equal to or greater than the required amount in the oning Regulations. Number and location of Parking Spaces:/ (9' x 18') with 22 or 24 foot aisles as required. Number and location of handicapped s aces as required. (see Table 26-1 of zoning regulations). Location of septic tanks (if appli able). Location of any easements. Lot coverage information: Buildi g footpri building, parking, and outside storage, landscaped areas an ront yard. Location of site (street # and to # . North arrow Name of person or firm prepa jngite plan and date. The McGraw -Edison Power Drawer Concourse area light combines the form and function of a highly styled, sharp -cutoff luminaire and the exclusive Power Drawer ballast assembly to offer tremendous design flexibility for any outdoor lighting application. Square, contemporary styling is appealing by day; low -glare, concealed light source and hydraformed reflector create a safe and attrac- tive visual environment at night. And the Power Drawer ballast assembly makes installation, upgrading and maintenance simple. Design Features One-piece formed -aluminum housing in dark bronze Polyester Powder Coat enamel finish. Continuous closed -cell silicone door frame gasket. Parabolic hydraformed aluminum reflector with specular anodized finish provides excellent photometric performance. Heavy -gauge support bracket. Support arm (optional) mounts directly to pole with concealed hardware. Tempered glass lens. Porcelain screw -shell socket fits Mogul Base HID lamps. Patented Power Drawer ballast assembly secures all electrical components. Automatic Snatch Latch allows removal without tools. Extruded -aluminum door frame with concealed hinges and quick -release latches. C 1 • A • B -� HOUSING STYLE A B. C 6 9Y2 8Y2„ 2 21'/a" 9Yz" 8'/a" 28'Ya" 9Y2"* 10%" *In all mounting configurations with luminaires mounted at 900, dimension B is 12N". See catalog number logic. GS-7 " CS-2 Cate169 Number CS18321 Catalog Number CS2O621 150-Watt HPS 400-Walt Mercury One Luminaire One Luminaire 16.000 Lumens 40,000 Lumens _ --Z(1� 7.8 4.7 3.1 L6 0.8 0.3 0.08 0.03 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 n 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 CS-3 Catalog Number CS21621 400-Watt Clear Metal Halide One Luminaire CS-4 Catalog Number CS22621 400-Watt HPS One Luminaire 32.000 Lumens 50.000 Lumens 25' 88 7.2 4.3 2.9 14 0.7 0.3 007 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 e CS-1 Mounting Height A B C D E F G H 4 30' 4 5.0 3.5 3.0 2.1 2.0 1.4 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.05 0.04 0.02 0,014 3 CS-2 2 Mounting Height A B C D E F G H 1 25' 4.3 2.9 1,4 0.7 0,3 007 0,03 0,01 30' 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.5 0.2 0.05 0.02 0.007 0 35' 2.2 1.5 0.7 0.3 0.15 0.04 0.015 0.005 1 2 3 CS-3 Mounting Height A B C D E F G H 4 30 6,0 5.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.5 0.2 0,05 35' 4.4 3.7 2.2 1.5 07 0.4 0,15 0.04 3 CS-4 2 Mounting Height A B C D E F G N 1 25' 7,2 4.3 2.9 1.4 04 0.14 0.04 0.014 30' 5.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.3 0,1 0.03 0.01 0 35' 3.7 2.2 1.5 0.7 0.2 0.07 0.02 0.007 1 2 3 4 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 CS-5 CS-5 (Two Luminaires) Catalog Number CS2O622 Mounting 400-Watt Mercury Height A B C D E F G H Two Luminaires 80,000 Lumens 30' 7.0 5.0 3.0 1.0 0.2 0.05 0.02 0.01 4 35 4.3 3.7 2.2 0.7 0,15 0.04 0,015 0,007 40' 3.9 2.8 1.7 0.6 0.11 0.03 0,01 0,006 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Catalog Number Logic 7th Digit= 1st Digit= 2nd Digit= 3rd Digit= 4th Digit= 5th Digit= 6th Digit= Mounting 8th, 9th & 10th Product Family Mounting Type Housing Style Lamp Type Lamp Wattage Distribution Configuration* Digits=Voltage C=Concourse S=Side Mount 1 =250 W Max. T=Pole Top 2=400 W Max. N=Knuckle Mount 3=1000 W Max. O=Merc. 1 =70 1 =Met. Hal. 2=100 2=HPS' 3=150t 8=HPS2 4=175 5=250 6=400 8 =1000 'HPS w/ CW Ballast 2HPS w/ Reactor Ballast *Pole mounting systems fit McGraw -Edison 4"and 6"square poles, except No. 4 (3 @ 1200) which fits 4"to 4j2"dia. round poles. ** Multi Tap Ballasts (120, 208, 240, 277) are factory wired for 277V operation. Lamps not included. t 150-Watt HPS uses S-55 lamp (Arc rating of 55 volts). High -Pressure Sodium Fixtures Catalog Lumin. Housing Lamp Lamp Number Config. Style Wattage Type 2=General area/ 1=Single 120=120V Asymmetric 2=2 @ 1801 208=208V 4=Extended area/ 3=2 @ 9011 240=240V Asymmetric 4=3 @ 1200 277=277V 5=3 @ 901 480=480V 6=Quad MT=Multi Tap** 7=Wall 8=Mast Arm 9= Direct Mount CS18121 Single 250 70 HPS ..0 CS18122 2 @ 1800 250 70 HPS 2.5 CS18123 2 @ 900 250 70 HPS rteac. 2.5 CS18124 3 @ 1200 250 70 HPS Reac, 2.5 CS18125 3 @ 900 250 70 HPS Reac. 2.7 CS18126 4 @ 900 250 70 HPS Reac. 2.7 CS18127 Wall 250 70 HPS Reac. CS18221 Single 250 100 HPS Reac. 1.3 CS18222 2 @ 1800 250 100 HPS Reac. 2.5 CS18223 2 @ 900 250 100 HPS Reac. 2.5 CS18224 3 @ 1200 250 100 HPS Reac. 2.5 CS18225 3 @ 900 250 100 HPS Reac. 2.7 CS18226 4 @ 900 250 100 HPS Reac. 2.7 CS18227 Wall 250 100 HPS Reac. CS18321 Single 250 150 HPS Reac. 1.3 CS18322 2 @ 1800 250 150 HPS Reac. 2.5 CS18323 2 @ 900 250 150 HPS Reac. 2.5 CS18324 3 @ 1200 250 150 HPS Reac. 2.5 CS18325 3 @ 900 250 150 HPS Reac. 2.7 CS18326 4 @ 900 250 150 HPS Reac. 2.7 CS18327 Wall 250 150 HPS Reac. -� 250 HPS CW CS12522 2 @ 1800 250 250 H 2.5 CS12523 2 @ 900 250 250 HPS CW 2.5 CS12524 3 @ 1200 250 250 HPS CW 2.5 CS12525 3 @ 900 250 250 HPS CW 2.7 CS12526 4 @ 900 250 250 HPS CW 2.7 CS12527 Wall 250 250 HPS CW CS22621 Single 400 400 HPS CW 2.0 CS22622 2 @ 1800 400 400 HPS CW 4.6 CS22623 2 @ 900 400 400 HPS CW 4.6 CS22624 3 @ 1200 400 400 HPS CW 3.8 CS22625 3 @ 900 400 400 HPS CW 4.2 CS22626 4 @ 900 400 400 HPS CW 4.2 CS22627 Wall 400 400 HPS CW CS32821 Single 1000 1000 HPS CW 3.2 CS32822 2 @ 1800 1000 1000 HPS CW 6.3 CS32823 2 @ 900 1000 1000 HPS CW 6.3 CS32824 3 @ 1200 1000 1000 HPS CW 6.4 CS32825 3 @ 900 1000 1000 HPS CW 6.6 CS32826 4 @ 900 1000 1000 HPS CW 6.6 CS32827 Wall 1000 1000 HPS CW Weight fLbs.i 29 29 29 29 48 85 *Effective Projected Area Sharp -cutoff luminaires are designed to shield light from the luminaire at angles above 72 degrees from vertical. This shield- ing angle of 72 degrees is selected as it is generally recognized by the lighting industry that discomfort glare is minimized when light strikes an observer's eyes at an angle below 72 degrees from vertical. Light source cutoff Maximum Candlepower Maximum Candlepower Zone .. Longitudinal 1 Distribution 3 MH 2 MH 1 MH Design 20 Diagram of equal footcandle levels showing Vertical candlepower distribution. excellent distribution on the ground for light- ing of long rectangular areas perpendicular to the front of the luminaire. Should be used when wide spacings are desired for narrow areas and roadways and when Lefl _ Right sharp cutoff is required. Cutoff 72' Design 40 Diagram of equal footcandle levels showing Vertical candlepower distribution. excellent distribution on the ground for light- ing of extended areas in front of the lumi- naire. Should be used when poles must be set back from the area to be illuminated but where sharp cutoff is still desired. C: \SDMPN0JLLDS\my\ia4-c2 Tu Fe0 04 21: 51: U 1997 ENGMEEFING VBTLYIES INC. -- -- ------------------- 9R PAIN ` � --_—G G_—___ GPAM G G 4 PMR7--`---------_ I I SWIFT STREET n I u u n I I i r ° s a z ^ � `-� I I °III 0 a DRAWN BY SHEET TITLE ARCHITECT DAVID LUCE ARCHITECT PC THE REVISIONS � C.R.H. 83 So. PAIN ST, MATERBURY, VT. 05878 CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST � crnL/ ENGINEERING VENTURES INC. PROPOSED OF LATTER—DAY SAINTS �ss4gC - z ~ z CHECKED BY SITE CONDITIONS PLAN STRUCTURAL 7 KILBURN ST.. BURIINGTON. VT. 05401 N BURLINGTON/ESSEX WARD $ m D.W.B. MECHANICAL/ AVENGCO, LTD ELECTRICAL 83 So. MAIN ST., MATERBURY. VT. 05676 MONTPEUER VERMONT STAKE Date Received By Date Application Completed and Received By By CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVI99 1) NAME, ADDRESS, AND PHONE NUMBER OF: (a) Owner of Record Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints; 50 East North Temple, Salt Lake City, Utah. (b) Applicant Bryant K. Gile, P.O. Box 99, Richmond, Vermont 05477 (c) Contact Person David Luce, Architect, P.O. Box 41, Waterbury Center, Vt. 05677. Tel: 244-7043 2) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 400 Swift Street, South Burlington, Vt. 3) PROPOSED USE(S): Church functions - assembly and instructional areas 4) SIZE OF PROJECT (i.e., # of units,floor area, etc.) Addition of 8200 S.F. to existing building. Increase from 70 to total of 120 cars. Minor modifications to existing building. 5) NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES (full & part time) n.a. 6) COST ESTIMATES: (a) Buildings $536,000 (b) Landscaping $ 16,000 (c) All Other Site Improvements (i.e., curb work) $20,000 7) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE April 1984 8) ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (in & out) 100 cars - see #10 below 9) PEAK HOUR(S) OF OPERATION see #10 below 10) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Wednesday after 6 pm and Sunday 8:30 am to 3 pm 9K5 ,�i June 30, 1983 Bryant Gile P.O. Box 99 Richmond, Vermont 05477 Dear Mr. Gile, Enclosed is a copy of the South Burlington Planning Commission's site plan approval with findings of fact and stipulations for your church addition at 400 Swift Street. Please leave yourself sufficient time to make bonding arrange- ments before youpplan to start construction of the building. A building permit must be obtained from Zoning Administrator, Richard Ward. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, David H. Spitz, City Planner DHS/mcg 2 Encls ` DHS J 6/28/83 MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the site plan application by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints for an addition at 400 Swift Street as depicted on two plans: (1) "Site Plan", prepared by David Luce, Architect, stamped 6/23/83 and (2) "Planting Plan", prepared by David Luce, Architect, last revised 6/22/83. Stipulations: 1) A landscaping bond of $16,000 shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. 2) This approval expires in 6 months. If connection to the City sewer is un- able to be approved by the City Manager within that time, then the site plan application must be resubmitted. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next Week's agenda items Date: 6/24/83 2) Church, Swift Street Driveway has been widened to 24 feet and second entrance has been deleted. Landscaping information is now complete and appears to be fairly substantial. I see no remaining problems with this application. 3) Tate, Williston Road The Zoning Board has approved this proposal for combined use of a new building as a pet shop and industrial building. One stipulation was that the existing front building (Imported Car Parts) be removed within 5 years. A storage building will be removed immediately. The existing entrance will have to be defined at a width of no greater than 36 feet. Also, a 6 foot wide offer of dedication for future road widening must be provided. Concerning a sidewalk, the administration does not feel that a single unconnected stretch, 140 feet in length, is useful at this time. In one other application we required an amount to be placed in escrow for a future sidewalk; however, because of the small amount involved and the bookkeeping requirements we don't recommend that approach either. Landscaping, parking, drainageand other required information appears to be complete and satisfactory. 4) Davis, Shelburne Road Application will go before the Zoning Board Monday evening for a front yard dimensional variance. Proposal is to add a 3900 square foot addition to a building previously occupied by John Hancock Insurance. New use will be a retail clothing store. Projected traffic volumes meet the standard for that location. A sidewalk exists on the property's Shelburne Read frontage. However, the City's sidewalk plan also calls for a future sidewalk on Imperial Drive and this applicant should be responsible for constructing it now. Front and rear circulation aisles should be widened to 20 feet. If necessary, several parking spaces should be removed to accomplish this. Also, a large amount of paving has been included so as to provide three spaces near Shelburne Road - not an aesthetically desirable arrangement. Proposed plantings shown within the City right-of-way will have to be relocated onto the applicant's property since there is an existing water line in that location. 5) Chinese Restaurant, Corporate Circle This is the first proposed development in Corporate Circle. The review procedure will be a sketch presentation followed by a revised final plat (public hearing). Re- levant stipulations from the original approval must be reviewed along with normal sub- division and site plan items. PLANNING CONIi'iISSIOPv JUN?E 14, 1983 The South Burlington Planning Commission held a regular meeting on Tuesday, June 14, 1983, at 7:30 pm, in the Conference Room, City Hall, 575 Dorset Street. Members Present Sidney Poger, Chairman; Judy Hurd, John Belter, George Mona, Mary -Barbara Maher Member Absent Peter Jacob Others Present David Spitz, Planner; Wally Carpenter, Frank Murray, Brian Gile, Larry Hugo, David Luce, Robert Paterson, Rene Berard, Steve Page, John Larkin, Eric Davis; Don Melvin, Free Press; Ruth Poger, The Other Paper Minutes of June 7, 1983 Mr. Mona moved that the minutes of June 7 1983 be approved as written. Mr. Belter seconded with unanimous consent. Site plan application by Church of Jesus Christ;of Latter Da Saints for an 8200 square foot addition at 400 Swift Street Mr. Spitz indicated that Zoning approval has been secured and that the only possible issue would be the entrance situation. The proposed addition will extend 28 feet to the west and ap- proximately 80 feet back. There will be additional parking in the rear. David Luce, architect, explained that they want to add 8,000 sq. feet for classes, an adult hall and a bishop's wing. They will also add 50 new parking spaces. The proposal is to enter from the current drive on Swift Street, then to have a ring road which will exit at the southwest corner of the property onto Swift Street. They also plan to tie into the city sewer instead of expanding the on -site system. Expansion is desired for expanded local and state activities. Brian Gile of the Church explained that weekday uses will include stage productions, basketball, volley ball, lectures, Scout meetings. Mrs. Maher asked whether Church officialsYad requested the 2 driveways. Mr. Luce said this is the standard plan requested by Salt Lake City where they prefer an in/out pattern of traffic. Mr. Mona said the question is whether this improves the current circulation of traffic. Mr. Luce indicated it was possible to have traffic flow around the traffic islands and out the same drive since there won't be conflicting patterns of traffic at the same time. Mr. Spitz indicated that aesthetically it would be better to have green space instead of the additional drive. Mr. Poger said it would be to the long term advantage of the City to have fewer curb cuts. Mr. Hugo noted that if the present driveway is widened, a large hickory tree will have to > >2 . come down, fie asked why two driveway; are object i:jriable. Mr. Poqer said the City has laid out, a major East/'Wiest road on Swift Street within the next 10-20 years, and the number of driveways will be critical to circulation on that road. Regarding run-off, Mr. Spitz indicated that additional run-off to adjacent property won't have a major impact on that property. Mr. Poger noted mat they plan to hook up to City sewers, but permission cannot be given until the Airport Drive sevfage plant is expanded. Mr. Spitz explained that the City expects the State to allow chemical treatment that will allow additional flow. Mr. Poger asked if there is a problem for the Church if action is postponed for two weeks so they can present a revised plan. The applicant indicated there was not. Mrs. Maher then moved to take further action on this application two weeks hence. Mr. Mona seconded with unanimous approval. Sketch plan request by Robert Paterson for resubdivision of of 1 of the Dr. French subdivision on Van Sicklen Road into three lots Mr. Spitz explained that Dr. French, now deceased, had created 5 lots out of his property. The original concern was that these lots not have access onto Hinesburg Rd, so it was planned to build Kendrick Lane as an access, running through the lo-t�3- Most of the lots have been sold or given as gifts. The issues involved are septic systems, since the lower land is said not to be good for such uses, and the 5-1 length to width guideline. In this case, resubdivision will result in a lot 275 feet wide and 1600 feet long. If the road on the lots is built as pictured, the home- stead lot will be less than 10 acres, but the average lot size will be 10 acres. Mr. Paterson explained that he is going to acquire the property this month. He is prepared to have tests made regarding septic tanks. He noted that Mr. Szymanski had indicated that it would be difficult and expensive to build and that this type of de- velopment discourages agricultural use. Mr. Spitz indicated he felt the agricultural issue was a "non -issue" due to the nature of the soil. Mr. Paterson said there is a piece of land on lot lA near Van Sicklen Rd. that is beautiful for building and also an area of lot 1B, near the grove of pine trees that would be a good building site. Since the dimensions of the lots was a question, Mr. Poger suggested dividing the area horizontally and reserving a right-of-way to Van Sicklen Rd. for the rear lot. Mr. Mona felt the back lot should have its own property to access on. A polling of the members showed that they agreed with Mr. Poger's plan. Sketch plan by Rene Berard for 8-lot industrial subdivision on than Allen Drive Mr. Page said that the area includes two 5-acre parcels, one on the north side of the road, one on the south side. There DHS 6/14/83 MOTION OF APPROVAL That the South Burlington Planning Commission grant site paln approval for a church addition at 400 Swift Street as depicted on two plans: (1) "Site Plan, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints," stamped June 8, 1983, 5 prepared by Boehm Associates, and (2) "Landscape Scheme, the Church of Jesus t�WAChrist of Latter Day Saints;" prepared by David Luce, Architect: Stipulations: 1) The existing drive shall be widened to 24 feet. The proposed drive on the x westerly property line shall be deleted. Revised plans shall be submitted l to and approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of a building permit. 2) This approval expires in 6 months. If connection to the City sewer is unable to be approved by the City Manager within that time, then the site plan application must be resubmitted. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 6/10/83 2)( Church of Latter Day Saints 1. Traffic volume on Swift Street will continue to increase especially when road is extended easterly. It is my preference to limit road openings as much as possible. I don't see any reason why this expansion can not be served by the existing entrance widened to 22 feet for two way travel. 2. Estimate of sewer contribution shall be supplied. Hook up to City system will be held up until the City is given permission to exceed the Airport Parkway plant capacity. 3. Storm water runoff shall be toward the north-east as shown on plan dated 6/8/83. 4) Berard Development, Ethan Allen Drive 1. With the increased development on Ethan Allen Drive this street will have to be rebuilt. The road is built without proper drainage resulting in road surface fail- ure. Ten foot easements along each side of the street should be reserved for widening and ditch construction. It will be easier to get the commitment froma single owner than have to deal with several in the future. 5) Ethan Allen Farm, Residential Subdivision 1. Poor Farm Road is a through street and curb cuts should -be discouraged. 2. The proposed water main must be entirely within the road rights -of -way and extended over the entire frontage. 3) Dr. French Subdivision, Van Sicklen Road 1. Lot 1B will be very difficult and expensive to build on. That is also true of lot lA except possibly near proposed future road. This type of subdivision dis- courages agricultural use of the land even if it were for pasture. M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: David H. Spitz, City Planner Re: Next week's agenda items Date: 6/10/83 2) �_Mormon hurc Ch ._.. This 8200 square foot addition to an existing church has been approved by the Zoning Board as a conditional use. Proposed parking increase from 70 to 120 spaces is greater than needed for normal Sunday use but will be needed for less frequent "assembly" use for church purposes. Landscaping and overall site layout seem satisfactory. My only question concerns the proposed access arrangement. Applicant is proposing two 16 feet wide drives, one to serve as an entrance and the other as an exit. The zoning ordinance does permit "dual driveways", but it can be questioned whether two drives located 160 feet apart constitute a dual driveway. In this case, drivers will usually be familar with the circulation pattern so that additional conflicts with Swift Street should not result. I think 1 drive would be preferable, part- ially for aesthetic reasons, but I cannot strongly argue against the applicant's proposal. 3) Paterson, Van Sicklen Road Three years ago, Dr. French subdivided his 76 acre property into four 10+ acre lots (as yet undeveloped) and a fifth lot of 31.4 acres containing an exist- ing dwelling. The original application divided the fifth lot into two parcels separated by a proposed road. The homestead would have had approximately 7 acres, and the balance would have been over 20 acres. At the final approval, the Planning Commission required that area to be combined into 1 lot. The new proposal would again set out the homestead as a separate lot, and the balance would be divided into two 10+ acre lots. Several issues should be noted: a) The homestead is still under 10 acres, however; this can be permitted under the new planned development provisions since overall density is sufficient. b) The original layout did not envision re -subdivision. Certain problems are created such as length to width ratios greater than the normal 5 to 1 stand- ard. c) The two new lots are on low-lying land downhill from an area that already was of questionable suitability for septic systems. Adequacy of waste disposal for these proposed lots must be carefully examined. 4) Berard, Ethan Allen Drive Rene Berard is proposing 8 industrial lots adjacent to the lots just subdivided el M"xo;q _z wi,� v� � DAVID � LUCE �� ARCHITECT • AIA BOX 41 WATERBURY CENTER, VERMONT 05677-CB021 244-7B41 May 17, 1983 Mr. David Spitz City Planner 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Dear Mr. Spitz: Vermont 05401 Enclosed is an application and four sets of site and landscaping plans for the LDS Church addition at 400 Swift Street. I have incorporated changes as we discussed, namely: 1) Eliminated second storage building at the rear of the property. 2) Made the two driveways an entrance/exit only proposition and reduced the new exit drive to 16'. 3) Changed setback distances to conform to R-2 requirements with municipal sewage connection. My civil engineer is in contact with the city engineer regarding site drainage and sewer connection. We will have site drainage details in time for the planning commission hearing. Please schedule a hearing on this project as soon as possible. Thank you. V ry/1 truly 40ur>/ David Luce, AIA enclosures cc: Bryant Gile Chet DeGroff