Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-84-0000 - Supplemental - 0085 Swift StreetSOUTH BURLINGTON "ZONING BOA-?D OF ADJUSTM .NT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b5 the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; R (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; lzj- (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 1 0 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. a Date .Z —.z- 7 _J � Appellant Vote: Yes No List findings below: 2 • add i1' �.�s•✓� S %a GS % ems' �/✓ ! h 4iY «t Appeal # .�— Sign SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOA';D Or ADJUSTyL:NT Findings in accordance with Section 446e of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created b5 the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 0- (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and t---1 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date .� � �- / �" Appellant Vote: Yes No Sign List findings below: 2. SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUST'��:NT Findings in accordance with Section 446F of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; 0 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 11 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; D (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to tr;e public welfare; and 11 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date Appellant_,4 Vote: Yes No Sign List findings below: 2. l 3• SOUTH BURLINGTON 'ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTM.:NT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; rc:r (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 11 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; LI (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to tree public welfare; and a, (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan.% Appeal # Date Anpellant f / ekt-tcc tA Vote: Yes No Si List findings below: 2. 3. SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOA:D OF ADJUSTM. NT Findings in accordance with Section 446F of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created bj the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; LI_ (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; D (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; I (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to trie public welfare; and a (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date Anpellant %4,,iAle-n,- Vote: Yes No List findings below: Appeal # ro S i g n �wC•G 1. O7k ., tti 4 70 — �c. 3. - N C a.ta✓i nee •`yT �S a I}-�ri�2c I i f c� K , SOUTH BURLINGTON 'ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTyL:NT Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; E (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; D-, (3) That such unnece sary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and EV (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal # Date A7 Appellant Vote: List findings beloyj: 1. 2. 3