HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-70-0000 - Decision - 0079 Swift StreetSOUTH ._JRLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF( .DJUMENT
Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development
Act
(1) That there are unique }physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size
or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions
peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary
hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances
or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning
regulations in -the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located; 0
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there
is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict
conformity with the provisions of the zoniP� regulations and that
the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable
the reasonable use of the property;
(3) That such unnece,�iary hardship has not been created by the
appellant;
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential"
character of the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located, nor substantially or permanently i air the
appropriate use or development of adjacent p perty, nor be
detrimental to the public welfare; and a
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the least
modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan.
/ Appeal #
Date
Appellant
Vote: Yes Q- No Sign
List findings below:
2.
3.
SOUTH( R LINGTON ZONING BOARD OF( JUSTMENT
Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development
Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size
or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions
peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary
hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances
or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning
regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located; 0
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there
is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict
conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that
the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable
the reasonable use of the property;
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the
appellant;
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential'
character of the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the
appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be
detrimental to the public welfare; and j ;'( "
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the least
modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan.
Appeal # -
Date
Appellant L����r-C�
Vote: Yes No Sign ---
List findings below:
2.
3.
SOUTH( RLINGTON ZONING BOARD OFF JUMENT
Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development
Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness or shallowness of lot size
or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions
peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary
hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances
or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning
regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located; jZ
(2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there
is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict
conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that
the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable
the reasonable use of the property;
(3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the
appellant;
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential'.
character of the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the
appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be
detrimental to the public welfare; and jA
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the least
modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. a
Date , - (c; �' C-
Appellant az-d&
Vote: Yes F-3 No M
List findings below:
Z
2.
Appeal
Sign
SOUTH( RLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF( JUSTMENT
Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development
Act
(1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions,
including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size
or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions
peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary
hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances
or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning
regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property
is locate ;
(2) That begause of such physical circumstances or conditions, there
is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict
conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that
the authorization of a variance is t re,€ore necessary to enable
the reasonable use of the property;
(3) That such unne,c-essary hardship has not been created by the
appellant;
(4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential"
character of the neighborhood or district in which the property
is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the
appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be
detrimental to the public welfare; an
(5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum
variance that will afford relief and will represent the least
modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plane -
Date �� Y
Appellant
C
Vote: es No 0
r
List findings below:
1.
2.
r
Appeal #�
Sign ��
3