Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0057 0069 0085 Swift StreetNo Text July 14, 2017 Re: #SP-17-47 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Administrative Officer concerning the above referenced application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincer y, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com Permit Number SP-C/I - (a(fice ua only APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Administrative ❑Development Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1.OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): U. ,. rJ % + N C„-T L.5 ,rJ 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): V Ji— j q 51 4177 _ L, 7&-' 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): 7,,Q MG S L 12 :" Zo � L� 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #). __t,� err 5 J t✓�t F r's� I% 4a. CONTACT EMAIL ADDRESS:: '�lI n u I p, r7v C p yrJ 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: �?,57 !jV1 F 7 S r` 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Offioe): `,. 7 !;s _ O; :)f." ,k_> 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846,4101 www.sburl.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): 60 4 _ L-- f= cG USE c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): _ — S' M d. Total building square remain): C- x! on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to =Sa F7" e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): cz_c r -,? /�_Z,90 _ L x ( 5 71 {,J 6 f Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): _ g, Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 2 Site Plan Application Form. Rev 12-2011 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 't1'.)- Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing b,; % B , sq. ft. Proposed t G_!o l tl sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing f 7 % / :t_ 0.^� sq. ft. Proposed ± _•. t °fo / ry 3t sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing % / r ® sq. ft. Proposed % / sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) c12 * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES / a. Building (including interior renovations): $ tJ d A b. Landscaping: $ 75-eD o co c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): J Ai 14. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): NJ C tf And S 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: M - lj= % M - 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: IA4 r' 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: A+1, L b 1 7 14. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)1 regular size copies, one reduced copy (I V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city'ss fee schedule. � � `� ®,,,�_ "3 , A"W, 4 /�0//� Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies, one reduced copy (1 V x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy. Sito Plan Appfication Form. Rev. 12-2011 NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. 4 lcLi�- tkTURE OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this Iine DATE OF SUBMISSION: 1 M�� REVIEW AUTHORITY: Development Review Board Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: f�l The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain: relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Site Plan Application Form. Rev 12-2011 -VUM,60- Cbs pogo vcopos&� A A c E A TYPICAL PAVER CROSS SECTION WITH PLASTIC EDGE A. TECHO BLOC PRECAST CONCRETE PAVER 2 a/s" (60 mm) THICK MIN B. W D JOINT FILL C. SAND SETTING BED (CONCRETE SAND) 1" (25 mm) D. EXTRA WIDTH EQUAL TOFOUNDATION THICKNESS E. LAWN i, PLASTIC EDGE G. NAIL Ii. GECTEXTILE 1. COMPACTED GRANULAR BASE 0.3 t' (0.20 mm) 1. 50GRADE Vermont Gas proposes to construct its patio over 12 inches of ASTM #2 stone (feature I. in the illustration above). This is more than double the base depth recommended by the paver manufacturer but because of the very dense subgrade conditions we believe this extra volume is necessary to (a) hold runoff until it is absorbed by the soil and (b) minimize the potential for frost heaving. Geotextile (feature H. in the illustration) will prevent the migration of fines into the base material. 181, ±840 S.F. OF Al, AND D' CCA V ill WETLAND BUFFER IMPACT (HATCHED AREA GRADE TO RET. MATCH EXISTING WALL 1 SAND (3:1 MAX. SLOPE FORMALIZE AND REGRADE EXISTING i GRAVEL GRAVEL STORAGE (SHADED AREA) ASPHALT EXISTING STORAGE BUNKERS CONC. PET. WALL GRADE TO DRAIN— 24" MAPLE SURVEYED BY: DATE: DRAWING BY: DATE: DESIGNED BY. DATE: AS -BUILT BY: DATE. Q 10" OAK 8" MAPLE Q Old _� S 12 ���cy"llrl OAK ,,,,k S�dAP__I F t+��, 8" MAPLE � � �.n.d 6" MAPLE a INV. 18 '`CMP tits INV. - 188,3� , . + Y -'" 8 OAK 30" OAK i. . © 4" MAPLE 1 3 Inv rt d ��1e� k��� ` in on re e a 6" MAPLE a 10" OAK 24" OAK . . .. SDE K Q 4" CHERRIES . 4" CHERRIES J 18" OAK . . , . EXISTING PAVED ELEV. ON 196.35' SHRUBS (TYP.) PARKING + . . Z PLANTINGS Proposed Potio Approx. 20'x4O' 2" JUNIPERS (TYP.) . . . a Proposed 8.. BIRCH S . . Patio IN18" CMP Area IN = +188.4 ` Permoble . . W . Pavers . a 30" OAK ❑ CONIC. PADS -: - 11 1 18" OAK TRANS. T SHRUBS � - ---- o-------- e---------•---------a•� e .PAD EXISTING ° TOPSO , SEED AND ERATOR BUILDING STABIL E 1)i EFt�SI�N9 ETE 12" OAK AC. UNIT SNO AREA % CON T AmI 1 +A1 '9 + MAIN IN NTIL 12r" OAK PE NfIJT pVEGETATION IS CONc. PADS + E 1'A CIS rpSTALL AND �� MAINTAIN S/Jv 12" OAK . FENCE PRIOR TO W . AND THOUGHOU L EC PT . + CO OCWON 7' D00 7' DOOR 12' DOOR 10' 000R 10. DOOR 3' OOOR ` (SE iiTAIrV I EDARS (TYP.) ET C3.0) ' cu o aL ® EXIST. SHALL W SWALE SHED SHED ENCLOSED ELEVATED o+ , RECYLING TEEL RAC 8' °LAW . BIN WALL INV. 6" PVC f . W INV. - ±191.8. o LIGHT POST (TYP.) STORAGE 1 STEEL BOLLARD (TYP.) 0 AREA EXISTING + . PAVED INV. 15" O x PARKING INV. - +1 O B !CEDARS I INV. 15" MP �p INV. . +90.1' STONE CHECK DAM NO AS NECESSARY (SEE �R�c 2 14" WILLO S ti/O CONC. PAD ON SHEET C3. I%9 0 ❑ ----- — — - qR 0 SHED °I SHED SHED I o 4" CEDAR ROW PIPE RACK REVISIONS INITIALS DATE ADDITIONAL NOTES INITIALS DATE DRAWING SCALE: SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT Added Proposed Patio JB 6/16/1 r 1.1 _ 20, ' Moved bike rack to other side of building JB 6/16/17 F VERMONT GAS SITE MAP Moved Bike Rack to Front of BuildingS.J.U. 7/07/17 calm .a t tea, PROOF LINE ONE INCH ve^rmont G� SHEET 01 NOTE- LOCATIONS OF FACILITIES ARE APPROXIMATE AND MAY VARY, ALWAYS r)RAWIN(: RQAI F (`HFr:K co. B-67 Bump .vrasaos-a67 CALL DIG SAFE BEFORE BEGINNING SCALE ACCURATE WHEN PROOF s..m smx. so. Bwtisw�. yr Bsaoa LXCAVATIONACT IVITIES@e11 LINE MEASURES ONE INCH °°,�o"B" MEDIUM PRESSURE NATURAL GAS PIPELINE m9:s S:\DRAWINGS\WORKING\SOBURL\VT Gas Site Plan 7-2-10.dgn Printed:711012017 8:47:39 AM August 18, 2011 Re: #SP-11-27 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six(6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Since y, aymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7010 0290 0000 2215 2821 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802,846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.coni Agenda #5 r= FA* :1:i11011" south urlingto PLANNING & ZONING MEMORANDUM TO: Development Review Boar FROM: Cathyann La Rose, Amp RE: Vermont Gas application DATE: July 29, 2011 The staff comments for this application are incomplete, due to no fault of the applicant. Please check your email Monday morning for a complete set of staff comments. We apologize for the inconvenience and delay. We believe this is a simple item to review and you should still have sufficient time to do so. As always, thank you for your support and hard work and understanding. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Report preparation date: August 1, 2011 \staffcomments\2011\SP_11_27_VTGas Plans received: June 21, 2011 85 Swift Street SITE PLAN APPLICATION #SD-11-27 Meeting Date: August 3, 2011 Agenda #5 Owner/Applicant Vermont Gas Systems 85 Swift Street South Burlington, VT 05407 Contact Steve Vock, Civil Engineering Associates James Mullowney, Vermont Gas 11 Location Map x Property Information Tax Parcel 1700-00085 Swift Street Zoning District bjer_t Property CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING Vermont Gas Systems, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting site plan approval to construct a detached accessory structure to contain a CNG fueling facility. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on June 21, 2011 and have the following comments. ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Table 1. Dimensional Reauirements Swift St Zoning District Re wired Propose Min. Lot Size 20,000 SF 4.2 acres Max. Building Coverage 40% 9.6% Max. Overall Coverage 70% 57.5% Min. Front Setback 30 ft. >30 ft. Min. Side Setback 10 ft. >10 ft. # Min. Rear Setback 65 ft. >65 ft. zoning compliance # minimum setback for non residential use from residential district is 65 feet. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. The applicant is proposing a new structure within which to house a compressed natural gas fueling facility. It is approximately 16'x16' and is proposed to be located on an existing gravel area. The newly proposed structure will not impact or hamper pedestrian movement. Parking remains unchanged. In accordance with Section 13.02(G)(5) of the SBLDR, a bicycle parking or storage facility shall be provided. A bicycle rack is depicted on the plans to the eastern side of the building. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING The proposal does not meet the threshold to necessitate any changes in the current parking configuration. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. There are no proposed changes to the existing building. The accessory unit is within its limitations. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Newly installed utility lines, services, or service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. There are no proposed changes to the existing building In addition to the above general review standards site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. There are no opportunities to provide access to abutting properties or to reduce curb cuts as part of this proposal. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Staff has already indicated that any newly installed utility lines, services, or service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). Solid waste facilities are available on site and adequately screened CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Landscaping DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING The applicant is proposing $200 in new landscaping. This meets the minimum requirements for landscaping. Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Site Plan Application #SP-11-27. Ily submitted, yann,/VaRose, AICP, Associate Planner Copy to: - Vermont Gas, Applicant r southburtim-7ton PLANNING & ZONING Permit Number SP- I I - q (office use only) APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Administrative XDevelopment Review Board All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1.OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): *MMONT- C;4S �WQ $,� 5,,,, t S-rt.Eei �6 , I��r��wt�� r yr 63-�tSli (p►+) 863 �88) 2 /rAx) 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED(S) (Book and page #): qoL. 1`1`1 P.a�E 477 - H78 3. AIPPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax ft V60^o,vr &Aa S-Mk-Ms 1•4 $S S., -A Ss¢.kkt , So. B.��C1..a�Te �y Vr' C)S403 663^tS it (fit) 363-$g72 chri 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): Z�TLP*crl A. C.W,k mac 4 3AME1> MALL.0,4-f-`j to MAA,,° riELp yity3 :So. 'butt.. 005403 \JrCf% to-4r 6As S•/CIS,: •wc, 4a. CONTACT EMAIL. ADDRESS:: SVo c it_ F Lo•" GAS.. CO•A 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: ta5 SW,fT 5-TFC0C 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 1'70O-poof 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): T14L KoPosEc> PRocs J.scruDES _rE ► of A nzw 5TikAcT-QIL -t"A7 wl-...t- C,G"ITA0,1 A CAk-6 D NAI-"XAc.. OAS F4'ti;_L.i"Cr F*-1 s6 f4 . TUL ,J W fgsr Ft LL- cv=Mf4c->50—' w'+-c. bc- LocAt ED .AT jtlC ?P- 4R. caf 10(- Loi A J v R.EPi-A< I HE TW0 E xiyrI"a b. �Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): rime fl'" W ^"+s V5 eCAARtbb-TNY L15GD At, 11AE b2rlt. S o7E f6f. y iZIV111;3T C&N 5 S `I S TO VMS c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): 1"k-c- ftwosED 15TRu5-144", aL%- e*Q'J:r ,4 A- Alf-"d Thy - IiL - C n1 C[ 'COM f tess Z. Z.►-4r 4 +4' Lv Q tf'..4cC -rtt z En 1 s Tea d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain): Ex,�twtx 1-w-vim [ RAWAD �� %%-oiar. - 254 S% e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): �RaPttistc� �j.xi►,Dw; _ IS.yi�%4i.`�.� l6t xi6�ls�7E.� QOA�OoSE.0 (JIdY.�►`'3�}, �L� r�O.S M✓<x ��.`,y° n1;, GNA.+ 1a Elc�ST�NCc f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): g. Number of employees (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): oviA - No C A Aar, 10 4 ,, 4p� of Grp �o� t�S h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: AR;?>, 022— Sq. Ft. a. Building: Existing 0,45 % / i .1,35 0J sq. ft. Proposed :t I . 62 % / 1'7 .C.,) -j sq. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 7,5 %/ * loS2sl sq. ft. Proposed t 57, 5 % / t-105, z3 CI sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing = 2.S-1 % / Z%6 sq. ft. Proposed 25. y % / z M-4 sq. ft. d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) fi '300 S'F- * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ 6,Oov. ov b. Landscaping: $ ;200-00 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): NA — Nu c -ffe.- S, TC. 'To,e.cv-��� 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): No "Att y� s 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: M- f , 7kW 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: M-- f - 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 611-1- 2011 14. OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES' (this shall be provided on a separate attached sheet and on pre -stamped and pre - addressed envelopes. The city will add the return address). Not required for Administrative Site Plan Applications 3 Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 I 15. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five (5)2 regular size copies and one reduced copy (I 1" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application in accordance with the city's fee schedule. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledgq. SIGNATLAE OF APPLICANT GNATURE OF PMOPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I( REVIEW AUTHORITY: L4'Development Review Board ❑ Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: N/O—Mplete Inco plete A XmVi istra AVO Yf icer bate The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. 2 Administrative site plan applications require three (3) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") Site Plan Application Form. Rev. 12-2010 °I • - a jj s s � , s a, 4 III •. - .,. . -tc i JR DEV LOPMENT LCr...ew a BOOSK I STATE OF VERMONT • NORTHWEST REGIONALI CORRECTION FACILITY TEN FARRELL STREET COO PORATON A 41 , SWIFT STREETago ,. � r.ri«�.�■ �. «s�:..,..,.,... t, .,,,vim , _ :.-„ ..�c.a.r - ..w.c, _ _.., _ �, - � I - —__ I I t ' - 0 NINE_,. 1 I SWIFT �STREET O 'ASSOCIATES LLC. -_ ' I i � Ii 401 _ I i O H C N Y __. � i�� . ... � •.. 1 EI IA� RE T I N — �» aa ,°�_CITY OF 1I SOUTH BURLINGION (low r - _.. `mot `• k� t PROPOSED NATURAL 695SIOD ON - - - _- (WIT 6-0BOL Stag STORAGE RACK uNTLL THREE Utilities shown do not purport to constitute or represent all utilities WITNe 080LlNtOS TO BE REMOVED NEW CEDARS THREE l3j P P P - - - new cEoaRs located upon or adjacent to the surveyed premises. Existing utility - - - - - - ¢-a TALL) Iocotions are approximate only. The Contractor shall field verify a utility conflicts. All discrepancies shall be reported to ilia Engine . Contractor shall contact Dig Safe (888-344-7233,p+for to any c cti ,LM1 CITY OF Elevations era NAVD 88 and were transierrZ72 the ,nroje'. a, k �' C. MITCHELL SOUTH BURLINGTON P. AUSTIN (\\ • f B• & J. S_HEA ` _ . This plan is not a boundary survey and is not Intended to be used as one. M. F. & E. SMITH Property line information Is based on the reference map entitled "Plat ' of Survey - Property of Vermont Gas" prepared by Civil Engineering 1 Associates Inc., dated June 11, 1997. j R FARRELL PARK s D-ENWOOQ DR. W18 I cmB I I I I I I I I I A. BOOSKA I I I JR DEVELOPMENT I C. BOOSKA I LLC I I I I I II I I I I I I NORTH COUNTRY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION C. MITCHELL I I P. AUSTIN I I B. & J. SHEA I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I STATE OF VERMONT \ NORTHWEST REGIONAL CORRECTION FACILITY l / SWIFT STREET I ----------' 1 1 S84' 8 I 1-4 ! I srruz No e.s r.rN - -Ir0 rwr ._. a -ir rr o.x NG I I Ir 1'• \� �� � I reuxE :> \ . III jbd � \\ ���a�+r`I11• ' I Itl / 1 0 �, T\ 1. J7 P. & T. AYER \\iI t[4.'.1' I � "1°-Z:':•I:�ia III � I r— ��.r4 • r � r.8-�-I — � \ \ v. r In,>eP � I $1 I ? / /-41 r cx I�..h�s: \\ �'\ "...�®� f III � m n "�" 1 •1. eDx�De�D V 1 vc 1\ I I .Pew III III, 11I I i III .�., � i � � � 1�I\ \ I _ _ —,..-' - •�= —,.� — — — — — I` I I I I , I i I GA III `II I / I � I I� I 1• -- IIIIII REM. O (coos.-. III rs WITH VERMONT GAS) — II IIIIII IIIII I'l� I \ Y1 , � IIIIII r'° ar Duxn \ � i 1 '�"°. �\, T14'S' \�1 �„ ' — � � JRce,vz sNm sNm p�_e="•_'---= ems-_- ---�-� � IIIIIIII � � 3 •� V _—_—��—_ Ir�u_qq��.. S1aD ON �\ - _ -- _ .- \ - ` \ (isrX'tb 9lAe / STcc`I croR TO \ \ \ \ \ 122.52' \ \ \\ \ SBN09 38 — — \ WIIR a' TO R O IED 1 M ` THREE (3) \ \ \ 90.29 144.04 2 M\I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON M. F. & E. SMITH I I I I I I SITE ENGINEER: r CIVIL INGINIIRING ASSOCIATIS. INC 1011AMMIElDVIEWIANE, SOI/INBLW MTON, VT OM 80Ea0L2323 EAr 8024e.-Ean rwe: ww.c.swecam wrrRlaet' m e - DMIN JDL CRICKED CJG 1PPROVID SAV OWNER: I I I NINETY NINE I I I SWIFT STREET I ASSOCIATES LLC. I I I I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS, INC. PROJECT: COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS EVALUATION 85 SWIFT STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT LOCATION MAP r' = 2oar D11S I MCM REMON Utilities s wn do not purport to constitute r represent oll utlllties located u n or ad cent to the surveyed pr lass. Exlautility ting Iocatlons re .pprozimate only. The Cogtrac r shall field verify all utility con icts. All discrepancies shall be re orted to the Engineer. The Contract. shall contact Dig Safe (888-3441233) prior to any construction. Elevation are NAVD 88 and were transferred to the project site from PROPOSED This plan s not a boundary survey and is not Intended to be used as one. Property ne Information is based on the reference map entitled Plat of SurveProperty of Vermont Gas' prepared by Civil Engineering Associat�a Inc., dated June 11, 1997. SITE PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE m a FARRELL PARK I IDeh — 40 tL D— DMV NC N—HER MAY, 2011 1"=40' C1.0 —1. N0. 11109 f CONCF (ROUNI S 17'0 STEEL PIPE (STANDARD/ SHOP PRIMED) THE FINISH 4 SHALL BE 2 COATS OF SAFETY YELLOW PAVEMEI 5' CONCRETE 24" BOLLARD DETAIL N T S U L N //�\//j/ /�A 1 rs M 1 O.C. x 1 & s6 0 10.5" O.C. x 27-6" U MIN. 24" THICKNESS OF FINE DENSE GRADED CRUSHED GRAVEL REINFORCING DETAIL SECTION A SCALE1"= 1'-0" 2 X 4 VERTICAL RIDGE VENT SUPPORT AS NEEDED AT 12 EACH RAFTER 12 -15 GALVANIZED STANDARDS 5 ALUMINUM ROOFING 7' X 101' RAFTERS FACIA BOARD 2 - 2 x 17' HEADER W/ 1/2" PLYWOOD (COLRD. WITH ENGINEER) COORDINATE WITH OWNER FOR SIDING MATERIAL AND COLOR NOTE: 9' (MIN.) OPENING COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION OF SHED WITH OWNER/ENGINEER 2 x 4 P.T. PLATE �\ 1O' CRUSHED GRAVEL PROPOSED CONCRETE PAO,.-. STANDFARD SUBBASE _ 2" X 4" RAMING WITH 5/S" SHEATHING AND WHITE VINYL SIDING (VERIFY WITH OWNER) SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /4" = 1' 12" THICK CONCRETE PAD F--------------- COMPRESSOR SKID LOCATION 12'- I L--------------� I II o +PARKING ELEV. 196.35' I SITE ENGINEER: I 1 inI PL (YPCIS ) -- INgYCLE RACK �C \ III I II I I 12 JUNIPERS I 'A / &CrtWIT/ - ` I CONIC. 81 BIRCH I CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. PAD III; / I I WMANSREIDWEWIANE, SWIN&ISINGTON, VT OUM � I eozee =3 FAX eaza =l we:.°«•.cas ee°m 1 J DRABN D—N JDL \ / SHRUB Row / / I /CONC. PADS :�• AK I 8Cx8D CHCJG SHRUBS R - ; \ � APPROVED EXISTING 1 I 01 x SAV MPDING 2'1K 889' OWNER: 1 2 0 KVERMONT F-CONCPADS GAS 93� 1 12OAK+ SYSTEMS, INC. PVCTt1917' DOOR 7' DOOR 12' DOOR 10' DOOR10' DOOR 3'F�DAR6 ( YP.) 11—---EXIST. SHALL W SWALE GU RD AIL I II I'ROJF.I'T: _------196--- _ ED — — — — — — O ENCLOSED ELEVATED ° \ 1 I I RECYLING RET. IQI INV. 6" PVC WALL 11 I II COMPRESSED W I < INV. = t191.8� EXISTING PAVED I I I °; ; NATURAL GAS II L GHT POST (TYP.) PARKING > I EVALUATION GE —195— O OAORRE STEEL BOLLARD (TIP.) a 85 SWIFT STREET O `` j l l l l l SOUTH BURLINGTON, I �j I I II VERMONT __,-- GAS CEp�IL I I V. 15" CMP 94 BE REMOVED (COORD.— I i I I i 1 II 0=0 V. = A90.1' --- WITH VERMONT GAS) — — — — 1— APPROX. EDGE III I II 1 1 I k 7 �S"0{y\�� /\ OF GRAVEL j I II I I I I 9a I I I I GASP 1 iIIIIII SHED SHEDdill ...I " WILLOW — � � _ _ � u---- ----------------- _ . �. -- ----- -_ - �; -JI I IIIIIII 1 �Z',O�IQ,C XAD — — — _ •—STOR GE RAL`I�.--193 _ /— TOE 1I1111 III wAn �u �Rb &kb NATURAL WSIOD ON 1 /-- FILL PIPE ��1 I I I II _--,s2----------''� '7TB' 16'� CONC. 3LA8 / S�ORA�`E 1�1Z K Co. ACTOR TO THREE (3) N ARS LOCATION MAP -- -- (211f4) _ 1\ X 6"0 BOLLARDS (TYP.) �y EAST SIDE OF STRUCTURE TO REMAIN OPEN A f4 16'-0" --.� COMPRESSOR GAS EQUIPMENT PAD PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" ■ NOTE: COORDINATE FINAL LAYOUT AND INSTALLATION WITH OWNER 16' xl6' CONCRETE PAD PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" LEGEND EXITING CONTOUR NOTES - - APPROXIMATE PROPERTY UNE — SETBACK ONE 1. Utilities shown do not purport to constitute or represent all utilities 0 IRON PIN located upon or adjacent to the surveyed premises. Existing utility locations are approximate only. The Contractor shall field verify all a CONC. MON. utility conflicts. All discrepancies shall be reported to the Engineer. The Contractor shall contact Dig Safe (888-344-7233) prior to any construction. — —ST— — STORM DRAINAGE ONE ® SEWER MANHOLE 2. Elevations are NAVD 88 and were transferred to the project site from ® STORM MANHOLE existing CEA control points. xj HYDRANT 3. This plan Is not a boundary survey and is not Intended to be used as one. s SHUT-OFF 4. Property line Information Is based on the reference map entitled "Plat `d POWER POLE of Survey - Property of Vermont Gas" prepared by Civil Engineering ■ CATCH BASIN Associates Inc.. dated June 11. 1997. UGHT POLE �^ SIGN DECIDUOUS TREE 16' X 16' SKID W/ ,yt CONIFEROUS TREE 17x& COMPRESSOR � rvvv-vwYYv� EDGE OF BRUSH/MOODS FENCE GRAPHIC SCALE ...- DRAINAGE SWALE m a ---•---•-•-•- DRAINAGE SWAY I MEN MEN ( D1 FEET ) I Inch - 20 11 R6'ICIDN I" = 2n0O' I PROPOSED SITE PLAN RA81NG I - — MAY, MAY. 2011 1" 20 C2 PRDI NO 11109 12-0 STEEL PIPE (STANDARD/ I SHOP PRIMED) THE FINISH \yl�\ 4' SHALL BE 2 COATS OF SAFETY YELLOW 5' CONCRETE C VIE FILLED (F DTOP) PAVEMENT 24" BOLLARD DETAIL NITS o, Nj L ' PARKING •I I \ MPV 66.9' I ONC. PADS \RE sCA \ WA TRASH � ECEPT `+ PVC I rR N #5 dt 1 "O.C. x 19'-6" �1 #6 C 10.5" D.C. x 22'-6" U /�J "^ MIN. 24' THICKNESS OF FINE DENSE GRADED CRUSHED GRAVEL REINFORCING DETAIL SECTION A 2 X 4 VERTICAL SUPPORT AS NEEDED AT EACH RAFTER STANDARDS 5 7' X 10" RAFTERS / COORDINATE WITH OWNER FOR SIDING MATERIAL AND COLOR NOTE: COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION OF SHED WITH OWNER/ENGINEER 2 x 4 P.T. PLATE 10' CRUSHED GRAVEL SUBBASE SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1' SCALE. 1" = 1'-0" RIDGE VENT GALVANIZED ALUMINUM ROOFING FACIA BOARD 2 - 2 x 17' HEADER W/ 1/2" PLYWOOD (COLRD. WITH ENGINEER) 7 9' (MIN.) OPENING -z ELEV. - 196.35' a o I SITE ENGINEER: PLANTING, // -- RAGKLE III.II I III �I p C (TYP-)\ __ 21 JUNIPERS _ 1196� / 8T BIRCH I CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. CONC. PAD lil: I I 10MASFffLDYE1Vl41hE, SOUfH BUsdGTOµ Vr OM - I / e0see.-2123 FAX ea2mr-2n1 w°e: www.cascwD DRATrN SHRUB / ROW J DL OAK CHECLtED CJG ( \ , APPRDYED EXISTING I `\ SAV ILDI/ /IOAK OWNER: � 12 'j1 I m " 12" OAK 12\ OAK I OAK I '\ 11 ° (C AR5 (TYP.) E11p I I -- cnigl-_ -. __----196- ED 7 I —___— — - ENCLOSED -- _ I O RECYLING RELEVATED RE. -am RAC III 11 I I I _ -BIN - 1 I I I Q I INV.6" PVC WALL Q II INV. = t191.8' EXISTING PAVED yl L GHT POST (TYP.) _ PARKING I I I II I I I -195— - -1g4, O O AREA III I STEEL BOLLARD (TYP.)01 I II -� -' GA ICEpIA II t V. 15" CMP 6EREMOVED{COORD.- V. = t1190.1'-------- WITH VERMONT GAS) 1 _ APPROX. EDGE II it I II II OF GRAVEL 3� I IIII / I�F�Otq�• R GAS P I I I I I I �Fq / i / II II �' — — — — PJeE.RACK. SHE SHED III — . _ _ — . � �--1- ---t93 - - ----=� ,---- --- - --- -_ --_ --------u j III III `1 WILLOW - - — CIINCD — — — . J`. — 'SiOR GE RACK-193 / ICE I RI I II 1 -- -- T06POSED NATURAL GA3 SI OD ON -- � FILL PIPED_ ��I \--192----__ _ ' (16 16) CONC. SLAB S�ORAZE WITH 5' _���-� TR OVED STANDARD 2" X 4" FRAMING 1 WITH 5/8" SHEATHING AND WHITE VINYL SIDING (VERIFY WITH OWNER) VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS, INC. PROJECT: COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS EVALUATION 85 SWIFT STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT CTOR TO THREE (3) )ARE 1 LOCATION MAP REVISION LEGEND 6"0 BOLLARDS (TYP.) —_-- +76 --- - EXISTING CONTOUR NOTES APPRONMATE PROPERTY LINE .----... - - a — SETBACK LINE d d A O IRON PIN 12"THICK CONCRETE a a O CONIC. MON. PAD EAST SIDE OF STRUCTURE a —5T— — STORM DRAINAGE LINE F l TO REMAIN OPEN m SEWER MANHOLE I I ® STORM MANHOLE jx HYDRANT COMPRESSOR O 1 s SHUT-OFF SKID LOCATION i 10 d POWER POLE 12'-0 ® CATCH BASIN I p LIGHT POLE I SIGN a ° G DECIDUOUS TREE p ° 16' X 16' SKID W/ - 17 x 8' COMPRESSOR . '. CONIFEROUS TREE � a d d C /YVYYY'Y'YVVY EDGE OF BRUSH/WOODS G Q FENCE ��...- DRAINAGE SWALE A NOTE: COORDINATE FINAL LAYOUT AND ------------- DRAINAGE SWALE 16'-0" INSTALLATION WITH OWNER j GAS EQUIPMENT COMPRESSOR PAD PLAN SCALE: 1/4" - 1' O" 16' x16' CONCRETE PAD PLAN SCALe 1/4' - 1'-0" 1. 2. 3. 4. Utilities shown do not purport to constitute or represent all utilities located upon or adjacent to the surveyed premises. Existing utility locations are approximate only. The Contractor shall field verify all utility conflicts. All discrepancies shall be reported to the Engineer. The Contractor shall contact Dig Safe (888-344-7233) prior to any construction. Elevations are NAVD 88 and were transferred to the project site from existing CEA control points. This plan is not a boundary survey and is not Intended to be used as one. Property line Information is based on the reference map entitled "Plat of Survey - Property of Vermont Gas' prepared by Civil Engineering Associates Inc., dated June 11. 1997. -- - - - ---- PROPOSED SITE PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE o m m ( IN FEET > I inch = 20 ft 1' - 2000 DATE DRAWING NUMBER MAY, 2011 SCAU zo' C1.0 r' = PRDI. ND. 11109 PLANNING & ZONI N G July 21, 2011 Dear Property Owner: Attached to this letter is a copy of the draft agenda for the August 3, 2011 South Burlington Development Review Board meeting. The agenda includes a proposal that abuts property you own. The official agenda will be posted on the City's website (www.sburl.com) by the Friday prior to the meeting. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846- 4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. :&n . Bela' 4 11, Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com AS9 ,� ► N 0 southburlington PLANNING & ZONING AGENDA South Burlington Development Review Board City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, VT. Tuesday, August 3, 2011 7:30 p.m. 1. Other business/announcements. 2. Final plat application #SD-11-24 of Heritage Automotive Group to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a multi -building complex used for auto sales, service and repair. The amendment consists of a three (3) phase project to include: 1) the construction of a private on -site above ground fueling station, 2) replacing an existing 8,715 sq. ft. automotive building with a 35,032 sq. ft. automotive service building, and 3) the construction of a 600 sq. ft. fagade feature to an existing sales building, 1580-1620 Shelburne Road. 3. Conditional use application #CU-11-03 of City of Burlington/ Burlington International Airport for after -the -fact approval to install a living wall to extend 14 feet in height, 1151 & 1153, Airport Drive. 4. Site plan application #SP-11-27 of Vermont Gas Systems Inc. to amend a previously approved plan for a 16,665 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of constructing a detachedaccessory structure to contain a CNG fueling facility, 85 Swift Street. 5. Master Plan application #MP-11-01 and preliminary plat application #SD-11-07 of Farrell Real Estate for a planned unit development on 25.91 acres developed with two (2) single family dwellings. The project consists ° of: 1) razing one (1) single family dwelling, 2) constructing 25 single family dwellings, and 3) constructing 22 two (2) family dwellings, 1302, 1340, and 1350 Spear Street. 6. Minutes of February 1, July 5, & July 19, 2011. Respectfully Submitted, Raymond J. Belair Administrative Officer � TAX•. ¶�t���0.�� . f, , ..... . , Wt K q X71 • '!�; n,�`H �• of `. _ - 4 JR DEV LOPMENT m to1l" LC C. BOOS STATE OF VERMON I . it ` NORTHWEST REGIONAL \ - ,;' �_ • - t �• CORRECTION FACILITY'` � I , COOPO N FAAq ET � — F e _` » t -.. "at,.. �. � sa ae��.. _ '•-, ..fir � � f c� tU mud w .<s ______ ' • SWIFT STREE7 I E^ nu i I � ­ a ' .rwww,-wwewp I - -- I , ` 9 i s P. & r. AYLPF it •`(h �:._ I I „, I, 9 „. ;.WIFT kNINENINETY NINE OCIASLC F }1# O TH C Y + ;i E At_ R 4N I N� �• Y, _ % _ aawniJa� l CITY OF - " - - SOUTH BURLINGTON —ram._ '..f i ' > •``-G 4 ^:.+..°4a �_ , • RZI, I'�1 r } t _+ ``� 4 • x�- a _\ " _ '"'.. "''} �' � � � i . � � I � I L � SII� ��"�o� [+_ �� •ai��' :xvc�MoroT s�- `� i �, , � •� •'r PROPOSED NATURAL GG D ON C. MITCHELL P. AUSTIN B. & J. S_ HEA M. F. rjj LINDENWOOD DR. SOUTH BURLING TON Elevations are NAVD 88 and were transferred `to the ,tiro sits This plan is not a boundary survey and Is not Intended to be used as one. 3 - Property line information Is based on the reference mop entitled "Plat- - of Survey — Property of Vermont Gas" prepared by Civil Engineering Associates Inc., dated June 11, 1997. FARRELL PARK I I — — I I I I I I A. BOOSKA I JR DEVELOPMENT C. BOOSKA I LL( I I I I I I I I I I I I I NORTH COUNTRY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION C. MITCHELL I I P AUSTIN I B. & J. SHEA I I I I I I I i I I I I m I I I y m y STATE OF VERMONT I NORTHWEST REGIONAL I CORRECTION FACILITY SWIFT STREET S84.3 6 ! _ — 1 � \r w .— Pain ( 0 G��R7WLBp(�E�YnyB''��GABLE' STR.c__� `— _` �I a'w• ° \'-� �,r our TiUNGTO ' ~ III ro � r® m III aw 1 m �•/ I � 1 , , \\ �: to c'inu6lf {I' ' ; I � �, F •• 9�\s . :. .. f y 1• aR�a�c� II :q• D.x Il IT P. & T. AYER QP l t I j i • ...v. eav . rsr °6.1 {\ llf. .11 1 I / wAumaa „a` I,I I,L I ; ,�cvr•'LII�'h�III � I P - I alwa i l F:�M: -t• t li(J Sao ,. show ,rlaro� N'I .fir 1.. 1 \ �i �.+ / i/i i• I� r\ `\� __ 1 1 \ \ I I I i I I.Ij) .T. — / w.rnc 1\ I ..ws I I l\ \ \, \� j � v �I w - a,nr � ram � •! III Il I I I t I r Par 0-) sudsP'"Aewo I I I III �: " aura i \ w a• I _ ens eaaASD ( P.1 — m o III IIII �I 6 \ III I I IIIII IIIIIIIIII II ( w.'•:.V.�_. •o _ -'° GA RE7REMOVEe{cooeo ra.r WITH VERMONT GAS) I(I11 \\\ \ � _ � ,• �1 1\ 1 I �� � 1 a 'P I IIII I I I sNm��f II .> - M� IIII \ \\ , - ., sLAe i sT GL IYAT 1c`a sk \ •�� �122.52' — 'ON S6ELT>9'36� �� VAM a• TO R OVED CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON M. F. & E. SMITH I I I I I I NINETY NINE SWIFT STREET ASSOCIATES LLC. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON SITE ENGINEER: f CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. ING I0K4MFEi.D VEWLAN, SOIIIHLILRILMTON, Vr OM e(Gdel-z127 FAX eD2-0e4a,r COPYIDaaT am" - R®ERVEp JDL cRzc CJG APPROPRD SAV OWNER: VERMONT GAS rrSYSTEMS, INC. -- -- JUL 07 2011 PROJECT: 4 y of Su. Burlington I COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS EVALUATION I85 SWIFT STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT it LOCATION MAP 1^ = 2L100 D1TR 1 -cm R6 KON Utilities s wn de not purport to constitute represent all utilities located u nor ad)ocent to the surveyed pr Ises. Existing utility - Iocationa re .,proximate only. The Contrac r shall field verify all utility con icta. All discrepancies sholl be rs orted to the Engineer. The Contract. shall contact Dig Safe (888-344— 233) prior to any construction. - - - ---- Elevation are NAVD 88 and were transferred to the project site from PROPOSED This plan s not a boundary survey and is not Intended to be used as one. Property ne information Is based on the reference map entitled Plat of Surve — Property of Vermont Gas prepared by Civil Engineering Assad Inc., dated June 11. 1997. SITE PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE :o ( IN FEET Da ) FARRELL PARK I Lh - 4D It. DATE DR nNG NUYHER MAY, 2011 1"IR "=40' C 1.0 PROJ. ND. 11109 17'STEEL PIPE (STANDARD/ --� S I SHOP PRIMED) THE FINISH \`I{�\ 4 SHALL BE 2 COATS OF SAFETY YELLOW CONC' (ROUT PAVEMENT s' CONCRETE za" BOLLARD DETAIL N.T.S I 1 I PARKING p i' U) I II 7 I / I I 1 � CONC. PADS I :MP Vim' \ 88.9' I •CONC. PADS 93� I RE � WA TRASH ECEPT PVC��, ±191.1, N ED �_,--------- 1 W I Q I MIN. 24" THICKNESS OF FINE DENSE GRADED CRUSHED GRAVEL REINFORCING DETAIL SECTION A 2 X 4 VERTICAL SUPPORT AS NEEDED AT EACH RAFTER STANDARDS 7' X 10'. RAFTERS COORDINATE WITH OWNER FOR SIDING MATERIAL AND COLOR NOTE: COORDINATE CONSTRUCTION OF SHED WITH OWNER/ENGINEER 2 x 4 P.T PLATE 10r' CRUSHED GRAVEL SUBBASE SOUTH ELEVATION -- SCALE: 1/4" = 1' 12" THICK CONCRETE PAD ---------------� I I I I I COMPRESSOR I SKID LOCATION I I L— — — — — — — — — — — --J SCALE: I - V-0" - RIDGE VENT r5 GALVANIZED ALUMINUM ROOFING FACIA BOARD 2 - 2 x 12" HEADER W/ 1/T PLYWOOD (COLRD. WITH ENGINEER) 9• (MIN.) OPENING STANDARD 7' X 4" FRAMING WITH 5/8" SHEATHING AND WHITE VINYL SIDING (VERIFY WITH OWNER) PLANTINGS (TYP.) SITE ENGINEER: MgYCLE RAgK i 21. JUNIPERS I IT / I I A TIT ,196 It BT BIRCH I CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC, CONC. PAD III• / I IO MNASFIBD WEW LANE, SOWNB(IPoJNGTON, VI OM III / I — %2de1-2V3 FAX 0)2-0 11 weC:.ww.cw+to°m / corrxT ® R SHRUB / DRATIN Row JOL g AK R 1 I CHxcxHD CJG EXISTING I y 10 r I APPRGWD SAV BUILDING 1211 0 K OWNER: i O L GHT POST (TYP.) PARKING � � l� it I 11 --- �'� 1 _ -_-,$JORAGE -194' AREA -'195— — - - ` ^STEEL BOLLARD (TYP.) O 13i t 11 ,�1, O I I I CEQkIRS. --- GA 11 I I 1 . 15" CMP \ BE REM61iEf} {600RQ•-- - - - 11 i It I = th 9o.1' 1 WITH VERMONT GAS) - - - - - - - I ? 111 I I i 1i _ APPROX. EDGE II I I I I I OF GRAVEL 11 111 PIeE.f�CK. _ SHED `1 WILLOW - - - - O t----- -- - FRO ED NA TUF 4L G/gS�SK --------- �� �'7�6' 16,E CONC. - - ° WITH 6" 6"0 BOLLARDS (TYP.) EAST SIDE OF STRUCTURE TO REMAIN OPEN A 16'-0" COMPRESSOR GAS EQUIPMENT PAD PLAN • EXI5.1. x+n�7 - - - _ - _ - -196- - - t - I O -- ENCLOSED ELEVATED �19 ' RECYLING RET TEEL RAC ---- INV. 6" PVC WALL � INV. = t191.8' EXISTING PAVED NOTE: COORDINATE FINAL LAYOTT AND INSTALLATION WITH OWNER 16' x16' CONCRETE PAD PLAN SCALE'. 1 /4" - V-0" LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR APPROXIMA1E PROPERTY LYE SETBACK LINE O IRON PIN O CONC. MO/. -- -ST- - STORM DRAINAGE LINE SEWER MANHOLE ® STDRM MANHOLE �( HYDRANT e SHUT-OFF ,a POWER POLE IM CATCH BASIN LIGHT POLE SIGN DECIDUOUS TREE 16' X 16' SKID W/ CONIFEROUS TREE 17x& COMPRESSOR mvrvvvw. EDGE OF BRUSH/WOODS �- FENCE --- DRAINAGE SWALE ------------ DRAINAGE SWALE II ;'I 1 � 111IIIIIII ❑GAS PUP e ) II l i I II II I -� / I IIIit IIIII �. R GE RAtYf---ig3 -----/ SCE I�� i 11 ON / - FlLL PIPE AB STORA45 f' A-CK, S 1111 I tD� TO R OVED I VER��++MC�OA��j��/NT G�A� ° 1 12\ OAK �A///�S SYJ.,�T�/M#7.� ARC c > I I `) 7 2011 PROJECT: of SO. Burlington 1 II I 1 11III COMPRESSED " NATURAL GAS I I " EVALUATION 85 SWIFT STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT LOCATION MAP 1" = 2000 NOTES 1. Utilities shown do not purport to constitute or represent all utilities located upon or adjacent to the surveyed premises. Existing utility locations are approximate only. The Contractor shall field verify all utility conflicts. All discrepancies shall be reported to the Engineer. The Contractor shall contact Dig Safe (BBB-344-7233) prior to any construction. 2. Elevations are NAVD 88 and were transferred to the project site from existing CEA control points. 3. This plan is not a boundary survey and le not Intended to be used os one. 4. Property line Information is based on the reference map entitled "Plat of Survey - Property of Vermont Gas" prepared by Civil Engineering Associates Inc., dated June 11, 1997. -_— ----- --- - ----- - -- PRO POSED SITE PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE M 0 b (new FEEL' ) L b - 20 1t D— ORARIN. NUMPRR MAY, 2011 " 1=20' C2 PROI NO 11109 ;I Q �I I I I II ,I 1 ® i (2) TON I II I 1 I ® o II I I I 0 I i 11 I� I I EX CEDA S' YP.) GAS PUMPS To I I (3) TON BE REMOVED (COORD. o WITH VERMONT GAS) � 0 ----------------------------------------- ---- I I �' I I I II III I IiI fi J I! _-------------- ------- ---------- ----------------------------------- PROPOSED NATURAL _. -....) I > I GAS SKID ON(16' X 16)- FILL PIPE I I II CONC. SLAB WITH 6" 0 I I I .. i I -STORAGE BOLLARDS RACK TO BE REMOVED I I I ' I 1 I VT 04e Tnsee Qty. Code Botanical Name Common Neme Size Spec Noles 5 TON THUJAo dentass'Nigre' Dark Green ­nRa. 5-6'H1. B88 RECEIVED JUL 0 7 2011 of So. Burlington PRUNE DAMAGED OR BROKEN BRANCHES. Cft USE WIDE BELT -TYPE TREE TIES; DO NOT USE ROPE OR WIRE IN HOSE SLEEVES. ATTACH AT 2/3 HEIGHT OF TREE. _ 3 - 2• X 2" HARDWOOD STAKES 113 HEIGHT OF TREE OR MIN. OF W. ALLOW FOR A DEPTH OF 12" BELOW UNDISTURBED GRADE. (STAKING TO BE REMOVED ONE YEAR AFTER PLANTING.) INSTALL STAKES PLUMB. ROOT FLARE SHALL BE PLANTED AT OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINAL GRADE (DUE TO NURSERY PRACTICES, THIS MAY REQUIRE REMOVING SOIL FROM THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL TO LOCATE THE "7 ROOT FLARE). ? 2"- 3' FINE CHIPPED BARK MULCH, NOT MORE. DO NOT PLACE ' MULCH DIRECTLY AGAINST TRUNK. 2" EARTH SAUCER. AMEND BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED, BREAK UP CLODS AND REMOVE DEBRIS AND STONES, rs•m SCARIFY SUBGRADE TO 4", z4. UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND. 3 -Es CUT 8 REMOVE ALL OF THE WIRE BASKET, EXCEPT THAT WHICH — DIAMETEROF u Hoot anIS UNDER THE ROOT BALL. LEAVE NO BURLAP EXPOSED ABOVE THE SOIL SURFACE, REMOVE BURLAP FROM THE TOP 1/2 OF ROOT BALL IF BURLAP IS MADE OF NATURAL FIBER. IF BURLAP IS PLASTIC OR TREATED, CUT AND REMOVE ALL BUT THAT WHICH IS 1 CONIFEROUS PLANTING UNDER THE ROOT BALL. _ L100 NTS. I GENERAL PLANTING NOTES, 10, ALL PLANT BEDS MUST HAVE A MINIMUM PLANT BED DEPTH 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE AND VERIFY THE OF 18" WITH A 2/3 TOPSOIL TO 1/3 COMPOST MIX. REMOVE SUBGRADE AND OTHER FILL IN PLANTING AREAS ON SITE. EXISTENCE OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. 11. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PER DETAILS AND THE 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY ALL PLANT MATERIAL IN CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. QUANTITIES SUFFICIENT TO COMPLETE THE PLANTING SHOWN ON ALL DRAWINGS. 12. STAKING PLANTS IS AT THE DISCRETION OF THE 3. ALL MATERIAL SHALL CONFORM TO THE GUIDELINES CONTRACTOR. ONLY STAKE PLANTS AS SPECIFIED BY ESTABLISHED BY THE CURRENT AMERICAN STANDARD FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. NURSERY STOCK (ANSI) PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN 13. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE AMENDED ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. BACKFILL AS PER THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. 4, NO PLANT SHALL BE PUT INTO THE GROUND BEFORE ROUGH 14. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE WATERED THOROUGHLY TWICE DURING GRADING HAS BEEN FINISHED AND APPROVED BY THE THE FIRST 24 HOUR PERIOD AFTER PLANTING. ALL PLANTS PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR EQUAL - SHALL THEN BE WATERED WEEKLY, IF NECESSARY, DURING 5..PLANTS SHALL BE INSTALLED SUCH THAT THE ROOT FLARE THE FIRST GROWING SEASON. IS AT OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINAL GRADE (DUE TO NURSERY 15. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE PRACTICES THIS MAY REQUIRE REMOVING SOIL FROM THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. TOP OF THE ROOT BALL TO LOCATE THE ROOT FLARE. - 16. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE PLANT B. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE BALLED AND BURLAPPED OR LIST FOR SEASONAL REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO THE TIME CONTAINER GROWN AS SPECIFIED. NO CONTAINER GROWN OF PLANTING. STOCK WILL BE ACCEPTED IF IT IS ROOT BOUND.ALL ROOT WRAPPING MATERIAL MADE OF SYNTHETICS OR PLASTICS SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE TIME OF PLANTING 7. 'NTH CONTAINER GROWN STOCK, THE CONTAINER SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE CONTAINER BALL SHALL BE CUT THROUGH THE SURFACE IN TWO VERTICAL LOCATIONS. 8. THE DAY PRIOR TO PLANTING, THE LOCATION OF ALL TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE STAKED FOR APPROVAL BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR EQUAL. 9. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAY REQUIRE ALL PLANTS BE - SPRAYED WITH AN ANTIDESSICANT WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER PLANTING. IN TEMPERATE ZONES, ALL PLANTS SHALL BE SPRAYED WITH AN ANTIDESSICANT AT THE BEGINNING OF THEIR FIRST WINTER.. REVISION 10ATE landscape architects a planning consultants �Tm �MJB KD 07IWI201 t Vermont Gas "���. 301 college street a burlington • vermont a 05401 802.658 e3555 http:1/cow gboyle. AIMJB wr 1" = 10' Planting Plan �L100 VT Gas 7/6/2011 Trees 2007 Prices Qty. Code I Botanical Name Common Name Size Spec Notes wholesale I installed 5 TON THUJA occidentalis 'Nigra' Dark Green Arborvitae 5-6' Ht. B&B $ 38.00 1 $ 475.00 RECEIVED JUL 0 7 2011 Cky of So. Budington r � I Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. Abutters List June 2011 Subject Parcel Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. 85 Swift Street South Burlington, VT 05403 PARCEL ID OWNER OF RECORD 1050-00014 Carolyn Mitchell 14 Lindenwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 1050-00016 Patricia Austin 16 Lindenwood Dr. South Burlington, VT 05403 1050-00018 Brian & Jeanne Shea 18 Lindenwood Dr. South Burlington, VT 05403 1050-20-22 Mark, Fred & Eleanor Smith 22 Lindenwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 1700-00095 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset St. South Burlington, VT 05403 1700-56-58 Adam Booska 8432 Firewheel Dr. Frisco, TX 75034 1700-64-66 Colleen Booska 64 Swift St. South Burlington, VT 05403 1700-00070 JR Development LLC 29 Vale Dr. South Burlington, VT 05403 0670-00010 Ten Farrell St. Corporation c/o Pomerleau Real Estate PO Box 6 Burlington, VT 05402-0006 1 0670-00007 State of Vermont Northwest Regional Correctional Facility 7 Farrell St. South Burlington, VT 05403 1700-00079 Patrick & Terese Ayer PO Box 9451 South Burlington, VT 05407 (Lessee) Jerry & Martha Couillard PO Box 310 Milton, VT 05468 1700-00099 Ninety Nine Swift Street Associates LLC PO Box 421 Burlington, VT 05407 1700-0069 North Country Federal Credit Union 69 Swift Street South Burlington, VT 05403 2 11 June 21, 2011 10 Mansfield View Lane South Burlington, VT 05403 To: Ray Belair Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Proposed CNG Fueling Station Vermont Gas Systems Inc., 85 Swift St. Dear Ray, Phone: 802-864-2323 Fax: 802-864-2271 E-Mail: mail@cea-vt.com Please find attached a site plan application, five (5) full size and one (1) half size plan set, an abutters list and an application fee check in the amount of $313.60 associated with the improvements for the Vermont Gas Systems Inc. site. As per our discussion, Vermont Gas is proposing to replace the existing time fill Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Station and install a new fast fill CNG fueling station. The proposed fueling station will be located within a new shed which will be built on top of a proposed 16' x 16' concrete pad. All new construction will be located within existing impervious area. (see attached site plan) The proposed CNG station will be for Vermont Gas use only and will service existing Vermont Gas CNG fueled vehicles and new vehicles as existing vehicles are converted over to CNG fueled vehicles. If you should have any questions or should require any additional information, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Christopher Galipeau Staff Engineer Enclosures: Site Plan Application Five (5) and One (1) Half-size Plan Set Abutters List Application Fee Check Cc: James Mullowney CEA file #11109.00 r� ►.� southburlinton PLANNING & ZONING July 20, 2010 James J. Mullowney PO Box 467 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Mullowney: Enclosed, pleasing find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered on July 19, 2010 (effective 7/19/10). Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoninq permit must be received within six (6) months If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Raymond Belair, Administrative Officer Encl. 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com Site Plan Application Permit Number SP- APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1. OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #): Vermont Gas SYSTEMS, Inc. P.O. Box 467 Burlington, VT 05402 PH: - - - -8872 2. LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #): 3. APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #): Same as owner. 4. CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #):_ James J . Mul lowney P.O. 467 PH: 802-863-4511 Burlington, VT 05402 Fax: - - a. Contact e-mail address: imullownev@vermontaas.com 5. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 85 Swift St., South Burlington, VT 6. TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office): 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General project description (explain what you want approval for): Install 10OKW emergency generator Site Plan Application b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Office Buildina c. Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): _,Same d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to XX)f9RVk 9Y'X!9N 1 6, 100 e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine): FX; s t- ; n q f. Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain): None g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non - office employees): No change h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): 8. LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: 183, 000 Sq. Ft a. Building: Existing 8.8 % / 16, 100 sq. ft. Proposed 8.8 % / 16, 10@q. ft. b. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 49 % / 89,670 sq. ft. Proposed 49 % / 89,670 sq. ft. c. Front yard (along each street) Existing 25 % / 45,750 sq. ft. Proposed 25 % 45, 7 5 0sq. ft. 2 d. Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) 400 Site Plan Application * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9. COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ N, , e b. Landscaping: $ 2 , 000.00 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): Rmergency Generator - $129,000.00 10. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a. Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) b. A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): c. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): 11. PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: No chanae. No change. No change. No change. 12. PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION: No change. 13. ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: Sept emeber 15, 2010 14. ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) N/A 3 Site Plan Application 15. SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 4 Site Plan Application I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my kno4edge. wAw '� • !ffw7—j 61*1 Eel wo- M ERTY OWNEV Do not write below this line PRINT NAME DATE OF SUBMISSION: 1 /� REVIEW AUTHORITY: ❑ Development Review Board 1 Admini t p s rative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete // _ ❑ Incomplete 7115,11116) Director of Planrfinfj & ZoYng or Designee 5 IY I/ I liI I. 1I 1 1 ,1 / 1 I I I I I Ill 0 / SWIFT STREET `— — — — — — — — — — — — — ---r- I . I I I - 10•YN'IE /j S-TLAPIZ------ TRAFrtc POLE MAPLE I I 1 II eMAPLE � °i� Vi1 (rz•-cAAA����CCC3++v��L�q�T INV 11 ]• .1 _ I / D• OAI( l� \�.v` I I I•I ,\ / III ' oA 1 1 Q1 131 B" MAPLE I ``t` a\- \• � � I / r e• YA�t'E IIII g \\�'• •. a1. 1„ lylr ss // ® / # .illl l ON /•1. ES d Ili \\ � N � :I, I I � I I \ + � �• oLERRN_c Ip It I 1 r°.'%1 Y a gONC :f: I ai oNc i fI i sLRuas (TIP.) It II 1 Fkvm / azr. - nue' / i IIII I 1F d•. 1. I. 1 I 1 1TM� I RA I I2T II III1r.'•�.•�.IJJ!.''I (1\i / ) aK it `Iill I II ' / y� l \ , j • ' rr RRm W SI[E1s YE-1 NW [� na vs�l R-lo a vN N / i/(i /I`° . • } L}' COVG PADS 1 i��•__IIy \ I DN111C 1 # 1/ \ N¢ m• p1P Rm I / 12' ON( i - I4' 1 7- O PROJECT NORTH I \ ) I 12' DAI( � SIN a' PVC r. I h \ k>�Ahs (lw.) VT Gas will H—IN I I Systems o 1 j!i _ _---- — NET Ili; Emergency 1 v��— WALL IIII Generator \1 �4L• I ! $ \ A� INV. - 3v101.8' .l ? 1 I •11 111 Replacement If I OHT PT (TrP.) _ \ I 1 I I I I os PwEII�AND IN STEEL BCIU ARD (TYP.) 1 I I I I I I 1 i i I BUFFER Dim I I I I II 1111 1�_ I I NV. 13• ®\ rFoe I It I II II II sovn, NV�oYroR 11 LI I vNmonl —`---- apl"r'sll INv. lr P—_—IN—__---___—_— IIIIII N1.1'------- IIII 210138 APPRCX EooE f'1.,. 1. )IIII II _.PIPE_ C( 9`0 AED �L/-J 1 j IIIIIIIII �laa oa Ate.:,.o>tn i--caa57Ao— 2AUMIAY _ �--IN-------/ \ --�\ /�—_In•\ I �I \\IIIIIIIt all Ilg OSITE .1-0 SITE PLAN SITE FUN Of. osa MOON ASSWARM INC. 10 YNGMD Rl UK SOMI B AL119 I yr DNW P. I0I-944-M 001 F 8112264•II71 er rvo. N MR Nm w 31Y 01 v ME-9 MINING SCu 3' HATCH - DO NO APPLY OR MOUND AROUND 1RUJK FORM 4' SAMOT j.Ek&LL *161* FIN9FD (FADE SOIL MD( - 2 PMIS D(CAVATED SOIL A D I PART B RUOTON NIEINNE COMPOST OR APPROVED EQUAL TAP TO REMOE MR POCKETS AND WATER THOROUGHLYCO/TANEPQEO 9NRue NOFES 1. REMOTE ALL NURSERY TAM ROPE, SIRING, AND RAGGING PRIOR TO RATTING TO PREW G OLNC. 2. PLANE SIRLD SO THAT TOP OF RDOT BALL Is EVEN WIN THE FMED GRADE 3. 4/RIBS SMALL BE GUARANTEED FOR A PERIOD OF 2 TEARS AFTER PLANTING OSHRUB PLANTING DETAIL 1 Nis EXISTING SHRUBS ON NORTH WALL 2 NTS EXISTING SHRUBS ON NORTH WALL :EX PINNING SPECIFICATION: I. PLANT NAMES NOICATED SHALL COMPLY WITH VANDAO® PLANT NAMES' AS ADOPTED 1H THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AIERICCAM JOINT COMMISSION OF HOf TICULTUK NWONCATIRE. PNPAOE STOCK TRUE TO BOTANICAL NAME AND LEGIBLY TAXED. 2. COMPLY WOH SONG AND GRACING STANDARDS OF THE LATEST EDITION OF 'AMERCAN STAMOADS FOR NURSERY STOCK! 5 ALL PLA415 9LAL BE NURSERY ORANN. 4. PRIM PLA415 TYPICAL OF TIER SPECIES M10 VAFETY; WITH NORYM• DUMY DEVELKIPED BEAICHES AND VIGOROUS, FIBROUS ROOT SYSTEM. 5. PRO+IDE ONLY SOUND, HEALTH, VIGOROUS PLANTS, REE FROM DEFECTS, DISFIGURING, KNOTS, SNSCAD NAVIES, FROST DPACICS, 0014MMS TO THE BAIL OWED LEADERS, PR11" MOUNDS GREATER THAN I NCH OfDWETER. INSECTS AD DISEASES. & SHRUBS SMi BE B AHC ED TO THE GROUND. 7. 00 NOT PINK BEFD E DELIVERY. & AL PUNTS SWU. BE LARGER THAN THE MINIMUM SIZE S•ECFEO. 9. PLACE RDTECINE CQFRNG OVER PLANS TRANSPORTED N WEN VDKLES TO PROTECT FROM WNUBRNL 10. OOKrAIER-0NOMIN STDM PLANTS SAL HAVE BEEN OOWA N OONTNER FOR SUFFICIENT MOUNT OF TIME FOR THE ROOT SYSTEM TO TMVE OMOFED TO HOLD ITS SOL TOGETHER, FFIN AND WHOLE. PLANTS SULL NEITHER IE LOOSE N THEIR OONTANER OR POT BOUND. 11. SHRUBS SHALL MEET THE REQME110NS FOR 94M AND WIGHT INDICATED IN THE PANT LIST. SINGLE STEMMED OR TIN RA45 WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. 12. TIME OF PLANING - APRL I3TE TO OCTOBER ISM 13. LOCATE RANTS NEGATED ON THE PUN IN THE FIELD. F OBSTRUCTIONS ARE FNCO NITR D THAT NEE NOT 94M ON THE DRAWINGS. DO NOT PROCEED NN PLANING OPERATIONS UNTE ALTERNATE PUNT LOCATIONS NAVE BEEN SIECIED. 14. F PLANTS CANNOT BE PLANTED IMETWITELY UPON DFINERY. PROTECT WOH SOIL NET PEAT MOSS. BARK MACE OR N A MANNER TO MAINTAIN THE HEALTH OF THE RANT. 15. ALL WDIN M BE N ACCORDANCE WITH AMDRCAN SOCIETY OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS FOR MATERIALS. INSTALLATION AD MAENfF1 AKE. 19. SET PLANTS QXLY N FIT SO TRUE(5 ARE snow. 17. PLACE TOPSOIL MIX N PIT NO COMPACT. WHEN HOLE 15 AMY FILLEDWATER THOROUGHLY. FILL REMAINDER OF OF HOLE BIRD C SAUCER EDGE BEYOND DOWATON, WATER INTRO ALLY AGAIN. 1W MACH PLANTING BEDS WON 43 HIM OF RNONG. 19. SATURATE INSTALLED RHOS WITH WATER DINED MAKIENA/CE PERIOD AS OFTEN AS NECESSARY TO INSURE ROPER SOL MOISTURE 20. PRUE TIFFS AS NECESSARY TO REMOVE DEAD DIE NAMED TMCS AND 9WIRES. MYE CUTS JUST OUT9BE OF BRANCH COLLAR. 21. MAINTAIN NEW PLWTNC AND CONTINUE UNTIL ACCEPTANCE MAINTENANCE NQIDES: PANING, WATERING, WEEDING, MECNG, RESETTING TO FINISH (FADE AND VERTICAL POSTON, R57MK PLANT SAILERS. 22. CORRECT DEFECINE NOR( AS SON AS POSSIBLE AFTER 09 COM BECOME APPARENT AND WEATHER AND SEASON POW. 23. REIM AND REPLACE ALL PLATS BRIMMED BY THE L A0SCAPE ANCIOELT TO BE UNSATISFACTORY DURING THE F/RA PLANTING NSTAlAI(N. 24. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO GUARANTEE ALL PLANT MATERIAL TO BE IN A HEALTH AND RDUR-91MG CONDITION FOR A PERIOD OF I YEAS FROM THE LATE OF WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE. 25, REAM.EMM BULL CLOSELY MATCH ADJACENT RAM OF THE SAME SPECIES. 29. CONTRACTOR 9W1. REPLACE FINED OR UNSA117XIM PLANTS AT NO COST TO THE OWNER WPJ_`::fY,ur3RVLCL?_l EIOSTNG SHRUBS TO RERAN, SEE ROM ON THIS SHEET T , SHRUB 1 3'4' TYP. x r 9R1s I _ 9EAtN I sW1�R , r�rrirrrriirr Vr rriiirrrrrrr PEDESTRIAN TRAMOL PAN l`G LGGLL.L/JJ..A11 �ARKN4G T OT A.RFA X X 1•X �S2ENTFIC NAME: THUTA 00CIOf7DAIS .... __ C(1WU1 HNIE EMEPND GREEN AIOORKAE HEIGHT- 3-4 FEET I ( GT: WFFEETIMAG3 ING: 3-1 FEET QDNM W 4•� RECOMMENDED BY: MANNY DUTRA AT GAIDBERS SUPPV'S WwSRON LOCATION 'BASED ON TIE RAMS 94MW TO ME THE MOST SIZABLE RANTS FOR THE MCA AROUND THIS WALL, TM NG N M A OOU T 92E OF THE AREA DKSRE AND HARDINESS IS TMUA OCCI0QNM7S 'EMERALD GREEN. THEY ARE EXRENRY HARDY. HIVE A OOIPALT QVWC RAW NO WILL REQMC THE LEAST AMOUR OF MANMF/1ANLL' SINCERELY, NNW Dim TRASH COMPACTOR AREA GARDENERS SUPPLY COMPANY 802-E50-2431 YlSgll OLANDSCAPING PLAN 4 1/4• - I•_(r PROJECT NORTH VT Gas Systems Emergency Generator Replacement 5—H, WurYngton Vermont �210138 ogc�ruYlon wYr: � LANDSCAPING PLAN ME-10 CIVIL E H G.IN55itI1 G A\`JJJC.Ir�rIt' IS)I !Nc, 928 Falls Road P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 July 261", 2007 To: Ray Belair Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Proposed Parking/Site Improvements Vermont Gas Systems Inc., 85 Swift St. Dear Ray, Phone: 802-985-2323 Fax: 802-985-2271 E-Mail: mail@cea-vt.com In compliance with item #3 of the decision for site plan approval for the Vermont Gas Systems site improvements, please find attached three (3) full size revised plan sets, as well as a letter of approval from Thomas DiPietro. The letter of approval is in response to item # 11 of the decision. In addition, Craig Lambert was consulted with regards to the landscaping revisions. If you should have any questions of concerns, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Jeffrey Olesky, P.E. Enclosures: Three (3) Revised Plan Sets Letter From Thomas DiPietro Cc: CEA file #05143 } South Burlington Stormwater Services 575 Dorset Street • South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel: (802) 658-7961 • Fax: (802) 65B-7976 July 24, 2007 Jeffrey Olesky, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 928 Falls Road PO Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 RE: Vermont Gas Systems, Parking Lot Extension Dear Jeff, Office Dept. of Public Works 104 Landfill Road I have reviewed the materials you sent to me regarding the Vermont Gas Systems parking lot extension located at 85 Swift Street in South Burlington. After reviewing the site plan, I have no additional comments for this project. Please ensure that appropriate erosion prevention and sediment control measures are installed and maintained throughout construction, and that they stay in place until the area is stabilized. Thank you for the chance to comment on this project. If you have any further questions, I can be reached at (802)658-7961 x108. CC: Cathy Larose, South Burlington Planning and Zoning Sincerely, Thomas J. DiPietro Jr. Stormwater Superintendent RECEIVED JUL 2 6 2007 CEA, Inc. SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 July 25, 2007 James Mullowney PO Box 467 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: Minutes - Vermont Gas Dear Mr. Mullowney: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved July 10, 2007 Development Review Board meeting minutes. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Betsy Mkbonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REV1,. W BOARD 10 JULY 2007 hearing, he had reviewed the testimony. Ms. Poon had no problem with Mr. Dinklage participating in this hearing. Mr. Dinklage noted there has been an issue in the city with the number of people living in dwellings. He reminded the applicant that a single family dwelling can be occupied by no more than 4 unrelated adults. He asked if the applicant was prepared to comply with this regulation. Ms. Poon said Mr. Poon would comply. Ms. Brown, who lives next to the applicant's house, asked how many people would live in the unit. Ms. Poon said probably 2 as it is very small. Ms. Brown noted there is another house in the neighborhood that appears to have many residents. The windows of this house are also boarded up. Mr. Dinklage suggested Ms. Brown speak with Mr. Belair about this. Ms. Quimby then moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-07-38 of Yun Poon subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site Plan Application #SP-07-43 of Steve Bushey to amend a previously approved plan for a 14,220 sq. ft. retail building. The amendment consists of landscaping modifications and other minor site modifications, 2500 Williston Road: Ms. Pettersen said the building is now occupied by Pet Food Warehouse and Earl's Cyclery. The applicant will remove some vegetation and replace it with concrete for display. Some additional pines, a crabapple tree and some deciduous shrubs will be added. Staff had no issues. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-07-43 of Steve Bushey subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. �6. Site Plan Application #SP-07-44 of Vermont Gas to amend a previously approved plan for a 16,665 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of constructing two new parking areas, 85 Swift Street: Mr. Mallowney said they will be adding 6 spaces in front and 8 in the rear lot. Mr. Dinklage asked where water from the new parking areas will drain. Mr. Maloney said it is sheet drainage. Mr. Dinklage said that means it goes into the wetland. He asked about mitigation. Mr. Mallowney said they have done some "informal" mitigation, including some big blocks which prevent rapid runoff. Mr. Belair suggested asking the engineer to design something simple and bring it back to the next meeting. Mr. Dinklage felt that the "blocks" should be shown on the plan. -2- SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REViL �V BOARD 10 JULY 2007 The approval motion was amended to add Stipulation 3d and Stipulation #11 as follows: 3d: The plans shall be revised to show the existing runoff mitigation. 11. The applicant shall consult with the Stormwater Superintendent and seek mitigation for the new encroachment into the wetland buffer. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Site Plan Application #SP-07-44 of Vermont Gas subject to the stipulations in the draft motion as amended above. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Miscellaneous Application #MS-07-05 of Winding Brook Homeowner's Association for removal of 1450 cubic yards of fill for reconstruction of the stormwater pond for the purpose of compliance with the State of Vermont stormwater rules, Winding Brook Drive: Staff had no issues with the application. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Miscellaneous Application #MS-07-05 of Winding Brook Homeowner's Association subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Final Plat Application #SD-07-37 of Eighty Midas Drive, LLC, to amend a previously approved planned unit -development consisting of an 8,480 sq. ft. general office building, including a drive-in bank. The amendment consists of minor site modifications, 80 Midas Drive: Mr. Vock said the project was approved about a year ago. There was discussion then about a transformer. The transformer has been moved from its original place and the sidewalk has been "jogged" a bit to accommodate it. Mr. Vock said there was no other viable and cost effective location for it. They have put much more landscaping around it and a walkway to it. Staff wants the walkway filled in with landscaping. This is acceptable to Green Mountain Power and the developer. Mr. Belair said the major issue is the setback waiver of 25 ft. bringing the setback to 5 ft. One corner would be within the 5 ft., and there is an option to "shave" it down. Mr. Vock showed that corner. He noted that Green Mountain Power has said the cap can be pushed back within compliance. Mr. Belair said the other waiver needed is for having an accessory structure in the front yard. Mr. Dinklage reminded the applicant that decision made because of cost are not decisions that should be made without DRB input. -3- `tT [gas f� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to eve been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon rson orecce receipt of r body notice of a earing d having the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the peal to appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE; /0 - a NAME MAILING ADDRESS t::,-t r41I Wkl P6. t�) (..0 l*-Zw 1 PROJECT OF INTEREST =ff CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: NAME MAII INC. AnnPI=QQ DDr% 1Cr"r r%c lkvrr-mr-e.r CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to eve been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)( )eUponrson rece receipt of ody notice of an aearing and ppeal the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the peal to appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST TAME S �' PU z�p� y� 7 V7" MULLoWJG V 7' f'i4'�`�NG- j•`-r�°4ov�r� M or if)ourCelle C aM� 4�� Cv^s rr� �3 /r,� ii 4 / 1/✓i/I a/rl�� 40 �c h eL 3 5 d "A Roo G-" i)4 has 1'C,erg 193 S-��e &akl— fe pl0�a5-00wjtj CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 13, 2007 James Mullowney PO Box 467 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: Vermont Gas Dear Mr. Mullowney: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on July 10, 2007 (effective 7/13/07). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the land records within 180 days (must be submitted & recorded by January 9. 20QB or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, 4a I - ) Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7006 3450 0002 0948 9076 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 6, 2007 James Mullowney PO Box 467 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Mullowney: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, July 10, 2007 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Bets cDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. / i _--w. f m Hr?a� CaMlallft — — • — MrSAaL LK o em Pilo o 00M 10L - -w- -satyr o•w w LM core NMI= O sewl 116"1011 xc NVONANT • NOT-aw 1w ►aret Paz ® aw„ WM �c uarr rau so ® e®uma wa rvvvvv VNv --_--•— WK w X&OV M Few Whew[ RANK aAr ■ etwAlos REATE NEW SHALLOW GRAStSj�AI,�D•SWALE --(SEED ONSHEETbS.0)'-,�\�� f I I I �`�\,� w �S7ONE CIHECK f \DAM (SE, DETAIL I NSHEETC3.0Y `- I , 3 NE*'PJM' (�EE i\Y ay LANDSCAPII6 w 1 Y ISI \ I SCH�DULE) rl I SETS \CHIC\\ so, aAw w U,j BUFFERD \11w w w w w (w w `yyjj I w I I L }I I. Utlltiss rremn do not purport to ooLaflbLt• or npr'owsnt d utlwws uvwv ity � apapprdoxi nwte arly. The GanbOdw Ind Add 1�1y w'I� w i Il y oontlwta AN dYawpon of ihd 0• nport•d to the �gb•or The y w1 \ I1 , } - t Qontracior •haN CC aantoot Cb Sah EE6-3t4-%133) prior to my aarwbuatlon, i �f 2 Ewvatwnw a• NAVD 118 and we bvrrfar•d to the project sib from •dstsq CEA oantral pohb. 3 Thw plan w not a boundary wlrvey and Is not Yltw WW to be u•ad ce ana4. } I I J r lnpwanwnb aowo pkn all* t=,:;at of � pai�q aM Yb j I•1t t 1 ,� �� tlliil �w` wwiw`I `� iii r GRAPHIC SCALE ! III • . �r 1 ` 1w:1 t I I IN I=� w WETLAND ��Y�FER r - - - \c. - r� z tra \-7 -_ . . — . IMPACT ± }3:0 SF\ I • i , . of J \\ \ - 1 �'3-NEW 'PJhJ/(SEE LANISCAPINGSCH I� •II ! 5 V I I I I y! A A I I RECLkIRGAA / / /DOST1NG PAVED PARKING SWIFT STREET is--:w i _..--- N r iswr •r o ®w � .emu EXISTING GUY WIRE TO REMAIN TOPSOIL, SEED MULCH ALL DI ED MATCt� b(ISTING / PAVEMENT GRADE r �� (SEE DETAIL ON MEET C3.0) 30' FRONT YARD SETBACK - \ III \\ I Ilil ' I I / SITR ENGDMR: r- ° \ CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC, fI II PA. BOX 485 SHELBURNE, VT 05482 B02-BBS-P313 FAK BO?-BBS-BTTi weD: whw.ce.M tOm ( mrrwoer was - .,,. mn zm+m JSO / CJG �0.� JLM 7 ACK APPNM= SAV I .y OWN": \ II f I I If11 .III � 11 I II . F� �—�—} fill o-DJ ( flfI : f I III ELEV. ON 196.3W \ IIIIII II \ � I tul� J I1r rr NO �� st �o i� \\ \ 1 \\ I II I AREA TOPSOIL III 1 SEED K MULOHt yl ! 11 I_ ! i t 1 I i !t � j` ' � \1 a= .' • 1 1 1 I 111 Ir�rl I i M M w �'-v �; sb I INST LL A D MAIN !I 1 f SILTIFENCEPRIbR 1 `B r" 1 SHED o --- -- -- - ------ ! I r I D � - � � _ - - - - - - - MATCH EXISTING •} I r ANDITHOILIGHOUTI I\ w i I - \q PAVEMENT GRADE J 1 II { , t NG j CO STRUCTICIdfSEE \ \ w �° ` A I y I I SfOR ryry �` 1 t 1 (SEE6ETAlt'@N ---- lltJ7 I' I BUNK RS N DETAIL ON SHEET,dq.0� \ w� M \ \ a SHEET C3.0) b 1 1 1 � � � p, , 1 � \� . �, wI C1 OfSO. gurbngtOn / f •r I 'I "\\ 4�-� \ _ _ .`\w \\\1 LR4"- ,9 O O—195------ I I I j I l I •j j l j j ` I \y w\� WETLAND \ �CLAW 11 I I I 1 I \ 1 y ' BUFFER' i I� y. \ I I i l l fI I I iI I / 1 W CLASS MI 1 JWETLAND \ d Ir fill ' 4 \ E)MNG BUILDING _ I DOSTING PAVED IIIIII II II PARKING •f !I IIIII� I ---- •I IIIIII LANDSCAPING SCHEDULE: II I__ _ — — _ _ III SPECIES COMMON N4ME PLANT SIZE NUMBER .Itt TOTAL COST — •'- —' I 1 I I I I RHODODENDRON'PJM' RHODODENDRON 351 HT. 5 $58.50 $351.00 NOTES: COSTS INCLUDE INSTALLATION. SEE INSTALLATION DETAIL ON SHEETC3.0. _ ICI iI i;I \ \ SNOW REMOVAL AREA ❑ I I 1 •1 j I, I I t i t 1 I1 I I SHED SHEDIII it \\\ `"O �O �� \�O 1•-� •\' •�� � ��_ '�. -'-� \ \\\ —� — i--- ��r,�jl.—.—.—.—.ter _t _•�.. A•++4—�`"'193--a _ :I+ I,IIIII \ \� �•�������� in �/ %— • _-192---.._-- _..__. _._ir_` -- ' i--- \ r / \' 1 92— J\�I 'IIIj1111 VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS, INC. I PROJECT: PROPOS! PARKING & IMPROVEME 85 SWIFT STREET SOUTH BURLING VERMONT 31 LOCATION MAP 1• = 2000 I Iw" I amL>m I wma•w I PROPOSED SITE PLAN ova oi►varo a°m DEC, 2006 scAu 1"=20' 2.0 ewT_ wo. No Text CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\vermontgas\parking lot sp.doc Vermont Gas Systems, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is requesting site plan approval to amend a previously approved plan for a 16,665 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of constructing two (2) new parking areas, 85 Swift Street. Associate Planner Cathyann LaRose and Administrative Officer Ray Belair, referred to herein as Staff, have reviewed the plans submitted on June 13, 2007 and have the following comments. ZONING DISTRICT & DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Table 1. Dimensional Requirements Swift St Zonin District Re uired Proposed Min. Lot Size 20,000 SF 4.2 acres Max. Building Coverage 40% 9.1 % Max. Overall Coverage 70% 49.3% Min. Front Setback 30 ft. >30 ft. Min. Side Setback 10 ft. >10 ft. # Min. Rear Setback 65 ft.-I >65 ft. zoning compliance # minimum setback for non residential use from residential district is 65 feet. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 15.18 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (SBLDR), PUDs shall comply with the following standards and conditions: Sufficient water supply and wastewater disposal capacity is available to meet the needs of the project. According to Section 15.13(B)(1) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, the existing public utility system shall be extended to provide the necessary quantity of water, at an acceptable pressure, to the proposed additional dwelling units. Pursuant to Section 15.13(D)(1), the developer shall connect to the public sewer system or provide a community wastewater system that is approved by the City and the State in any subdivision where off -lot wastewater is proposed. The developer is required to provide such pumping and other facilities as may be necessary. There are no changes to the building or anticipated needs for water or sewer; the plans do not warrant review by the South Burlington Water Department. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\vermontgas\parkinq lot sp doc Sufficient grading and erosion controls will be utilized during and after construction to prevent soil erosion and runoff from creating unhealthy or dangerous conditions on the subject property and adjacent properties. The applicant has submitted a grading and erosion control plan. 1. The proposed project shall adhere to standards for erosion control as set forth in Section 16.03 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. In addition, the grading plan shall meet the standards set forth in Section 16.04 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The project incorporates access, circulation and traffic management strategies sufficient to prevent unreasonable congestion of adjacent roads. Access to this development is not proposed to change. The new parking areas are proposed in the north and western edges of the parking lot. Staff does not anticipate any problems with circulation. Aisle widths are appropriate. The project's design respects and will provide suitable protection to wetlands, streams, wildlife habitat as identified in the Open Space Strategy, and any unique natural features on the site. The southern proposed parking area does infringe into the Class III wetland buffer. The DRB should discuss this infringement and render a decision. 2. The Board shall determine whether or not the proposed parking area may infringe into the Class III wetland buffer. The applicant shall adhere to this decision and the plans shall be revised if necessary. The project is designed to be visually compatible with the planned development patterns in the area, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the purpose of the zoning district(s) in which it is located. There is no proposed change in use on the property with respect to this application Open space areas on the site have been located in such a way as to maximize opportunities for creating contiguous open spaces between adjoining parcels and/or stream buffer areas. Staff feels the above -mentioned criterion is adequately met through this proposal. The southwestern portion of the property remains open. Furthermore, the plans show a 65 foot open -space buffer to remain between the residential and commercial zoning districts. The layout of a subdivision or PUD has been reviewed by the Fire Chief or (designee) to ensure that adequate fire protection can be provided. The South Burlington Fire Chief has stated that there is no need to review the plans with respect to this application. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\vermontgas\parking lot sp.doc Roads, recreation paths, stormwater facilities, sidewalks, landscaping, utility lines and lighting have been designed in a manner that is compatible with the extension of such services and infrastructure to adjacent landowners. No new utility lines, services, and service modifications are proposed. Roads, utilities, sidewalks, recreation paths, and lighting are designed in a manner that is consistent with City utility and roadway plans and maintenance standards. No new lighting is proposed or considered as part of this application. The project is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan for the affected district(s). Staff feels the proposed PUD is consistent with the South Burlington Comprehensive Plan as per the comments above relating to the purpose of the SW Zoning District. SITE PLAN REVIEW STANDARDS Pursuant to Section 14.03(A)(6) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, any PUD shall require site plan approval. Section 14.06 establishes the following general review standards for all site plan applications: The site shall be planned to accomplish a desirable transition from structure to site, from structure to structure, and to provide for adequate planting, safe pedestrian movement, and adequate parking areas. Staff feels the proposed PUD accomplishes a desirable transition from structure to site and from structure to structure. In accordance with Section 13.02(G)(5) of the SBLDR, a bicycle parking or storage facility shall be provided. The Development Review Board has the authority to require one for each building. Staff suggests that just one or two racks would be appropriate. A bicycle rack is depicted on the plans to the eastern side of the building. Parking shall be located to the rear or sides of buildings to the greatest extent practicable. The applicant is proposing six (6) new spaces to be located in the front of the building, approximately 30 feet from the road. The Board should discuss the plan's compliance with this criterion and render a decision. 3. The Board shall render a decision regarding the appropriateness of the six parking spaces in the front yard. The applicant shall adhere to this decision; if necessary the plans shall be revised accordingly. Without restricting the permissible limits of the applicable zoning district, the height and scale of each building shall be compatible with its site and existing or adjoining buildings. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\vermontgas\parkinq lot sp.doc There are no proposed changes to the existing building. Newly installed utility services and service modifications necessitated by exterior alterations or building expansions shall, to the extent feasible, be underground. Staff has already indicated that any newly installed utility lines, services, or service modifications shall be underground. The DRB shall encourage the use of a combination of common materials and architectural characteristics, landscaping, buffers, screens and visual interruptions to create attractive transitions between buildings of different architectural styles. Proposed structures shall be related harmoniously to themselves, the terrain and to existing buildings and roads in the vicinity that have a visual relationship to the proposed structures. There are no proposed changes to the existing building. In addition to the above general review standards, site plan applications shall meet the following specific standards as set forth in Section 14.07 of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: The reservation of land may be required on any lot for provision of access to abutting properties whenever such access is deemed necessary to reduce curb cuts onto an arterial of collector street, to provide additional access for emergency or other purposes, or to improve general access and circulation in the area. There are no opportunities to provide access to abutting properties or to reduce curb cuts as part of this proposal. Electric, telephone and other wire -served utility lines and service connections shall be underground. Any utility installations remaining above ground shall be located so as to have a harmonious relation to neighboring properties and to the site. Staff has already indicated that any newly installed utility lines, services, or service modifications shall be underground. All dumpsters and other facilities to handle solid waste, including compliance with any recycling or other requirements, shall be accessible, secure and properly screened with opaque fencing to ensure that trash and debris do not escape the enclosure(s). The plans do not show any solid waste facilities. The applicant shall either show the location of a screened dumpster on the site, or shall indicate that trash is to be maintained indoors. 4. The applicant shall address the issue of trash storage on the site. Any dumpsters shall be shown on the plans and be properly screened in accordance with the SBLDR. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING \drb\sub\vermontgas\parkinq lot sq doc Landscaping The applicant has submitted a proposal for several new shrubs. The City Arborist has reviewed the plans and provided comments: I would suggest that they forego planting rhododendrons around the parking lot. Some trees would be more appropriate as the rhodies will most likely be damaged when the lots are plowed in the winter 5. The applicant shall adhere to the comments of the City Arborist. The plans shall be revised and approved by the City Arborist. Other Staff notices that snow removal areas have been added to the plans since the last approval. Two of those areas are within Class I II wetland buffers. Staff recommends that these be moved elsewhere on the site. The amount of salt and silt which accumulates after a snowmelt is too much for the wetland buffer. This standard has been supported by a third -party wetlands expert. 6. The snow storage areas shall be relocated completely outside of the wetland buffer areas. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Site Plan Application #SP-07-44 subject to the conditional items included above. Respectfully submitted, A i% � _/.. �i rathya-91-fLaRose, Associate Planner Copy to: Vermont Gas, Applicant ,ENNUI REALITY. LLD I I I I I II A. WOSKA I M DEVfl.APNERT, LLC 3 L IAISEL E NOTES 1. UtMR!•• shown do not purport to conetltute or represent ON utlRies located upon r odpoent to theuKvsywd pr•mY••. Existing utlky locations we approxknab only. The Controctar shall fold Va* all utility eon licta Al a.ar panales ilal w reported to the Enouser. The Contractor shall contact Dl9 Safe (e86-544-7233) prior to any caurmutbn. 2. Elevations are NAVD 66 and were transferred to the pro}ot die horn rdstkrq CEA omtral points. 3. This plan o not a boundary survey and F not Intended to be used as one. 4, Property line Information Is based on reference maps entitled 'Plat (A GI+rvsY — Property of Vermont Ooe prepared by CM Engineer � VEp I UN 1 I,� 2007 V,� .f. T So B�In9ton Msoclatee kx., dated lu s 11. 1997 and 'Swift Street P.U.D. 57, 60 1 R 85 Swift Street — Overall Sits Plan' prepared by CM En9tiessin9 NORTHWEST REGIONAL Associates Inc., dated April, 1997. CORRECTION FACLITY ecp 1JT7 I 11 1 1 � I PAVID — PANOW , A. t ►L St. AMAND I wo a I - 1 1 1 I I I 1 I 1 � 1 1 1)0 r aonaw , 1 69 SWE" - - "•"�` „` ( STREET o ens M o cda was. — —sr— — slaws DRAMM LM m 1131st rAwcri 1 --- ® elder wewrdc A t M. I V RfEMUT St. AMAND • swr-0rr oswo MyeD .o` Pea Pas 1 Mersa o aye err 1 uort Pas I sw ® dsxuds vacs oosrsas W111 Y ®es ar WLMVWM 1 � I — ._— loners seeress des s"M So" I 1 C. MTIOELL 1 P. A BOOSKA it Sara 11 1 SWIFT STREET we Se Rao. ARUZZA I aTY or GRAPHIC SCALE s SURLNGIM INFM I Inch - 30 tt SITE ENGINEER: _0� CIVIL EMGINEEkIMG ASSOCIATES. INC. P.O. BOX485 SHELBURNE, VT 05482 802-_23 23 FN(.' 80-52271 web: xww.c•e N.com eWr -Ill u�re omrm JSO / CJG J�LM APPmVra TRC OWNER: VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS, INC. PROJECT: PROPOSED PARKING & SITE IMPROVEMENTS 85 SWIFT STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT 1 i k-- 1 LOCATION MAP CITY OF iS. nIn aaec,rm e N EXISTING OVERALL SITE PLAN do nuPwc emlmn DEC, 2006 1"=30' C1.0 Pea. No. 05143 J.i�rHgxwmn 2 oartouR h t_ eeo •� wrN7rXx rmw" um — ..,._ WMArx rx 1 SWIFT STREET o Fm Pe Comm MML - - - -' -5.E _ _ _ - - - - - - 10' MAPLE r - TRAFFIC POLE �- f - _._ —R-- — elder DRANAO[ UI ) I `\ ,t(Hy, A — s' MAPLE 1D a>ot wrsfaE III „r19p- \ � � ` r M -8f M AKE W SIONNI rwa eE INV ))1 . I \ F-- - . — . — = E MAPLE . _ . -- - \ L .i c� 983 YriWIDRANTINV` PazIT 0 GwH M�1 # uafT POLE 1 1 I I' It. saw e Domums win ' onemam INK y�Rp`t^ .• W �\ m: ar wISI/roaoa SETS \ \ \ I� rota \ \ . i I LI 1 WETLAND -.1=-- -- DRAINAGE OWdE W �1 + • 1u 1 i BUFFER • MANAGE SAME NOM 1. Utltitles shown do not purport to constitute or represent all utilities located upon or adjacent to the surveyed Existing . - premises. utility locations are apprrn6nate ordy. The Cmtractor shalt field vw* all } V !� i• I 1 1 1 EXISTING / uy conflicts. AN discrepancies dnall be reported to the Eiges knr. the le tltit } 1\v 1 .. 1 1 I PAVED Oontroctor dealt contact Dip Safe (888-344-7233) prior to any construction. 11 I!''ll . " wII // PARKING / 2. Elevations am NAVD alland were transferred to the project Hte from i I y existing CEA control poinTa WW / 3 This plan Is not a boundary survey and Is not Intended to be used am one. i I. •p I � JI ! r 4. Property Ww Infort ation Is band an the rehrernee map entitled 'Plat.I+ 1 of Survey - Property of Vermont Gas' Prepared by CM Engi neehq i Assoclates bne., dated June 11. 1997, I 1 \ { I 1 1 I . j • . + 1. _ 1 i I 1 4 \ I 1 I IS' OAK C I 1 "1B"CMP ( Ii GRAPHIC SCALE f II Iif N. \1. w .% i I r / r l '- i >oo a 1 4•/� . � �, � . \ i . \ `'� 30' OAK (D1 CONC. PADS / �>�.,- t more - 20 zo n rj% �� I � " g1-• ` jl '''�- � / Fl� 1 1 _ _ ___ GAS C.WALL _ . �? , II \� rINV. 1�• CMPINV. 1 t188.9' 19S, ai //rCONC. PADS I \ I I >\. t ' ' •! IW I APPROX. EDGE s 11 II; 11 I \ I�• I $, WLLOI• ' / 1 OF GRAVEL I ' e----- _- t APPROX. EDGE t 1 1 OF GRAVEL t1 1 /° j I "r83• I RET. �8' MAPLE VAI 1 4' CHERRIES _!gR \ 1_2 1 g. OAK � 30' FRONT 6' MAPLE Z, a -� _kdue 10.OAK YARD SETBACK t 1-72•-A��, 94- :; l " 'sue I l h 4 M Id i Iq \ I III 6' MA II III \ I 111 \� IIII . III l l -. Ii r ! ` "• CHERRIES l o+� OAK 10' SIDE OAK OAK OAK ro- Um CONC ELEV. 1116 36' t SHRUBS (TYP.)tit I Y R CI(L �\ I Ill II I CONC. PAD 91TE ENGINEER: _0� CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. P.O. BOX 485 SHELBURNE, VT O5482 B 015-2323 FA% Bat-985-1271 web: www.cee H.can corxmr roar - ua e1fdA erm�Y neeN JSO / CJG JLIVI APPtOvm TRC OWNER: VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS, INC. PROJECT: 2' JUNIPERS PROPOSED I /l B? ��" PARKING & SITE ' �( !/I IMPROVEMENTS SHRUB ` n, !q ROW I. 1 OAK \ 1 N /I 12�1 OAK I w �12 `OAK I i• , 2' OAK et WALL CONC //// / \\ II I I \\ \ 1 \\\ 1 I / .t` I PAD Y DOOR T DOOR 12' DOOR/ 10' DOOR 0 DOOR 3' DOOR 1 t j R I 1 I \ \ \1 t PVC III it 3` - , ,meµ . `I !�. J I\\ I INV. 8 t191.1' AIL AIRS (TYP.) i;l• V f I 1{ I� 1 I I I l �{ >✓ . \ _ ' _ EXIST. SHALLOW S,}M SANG 1 I t / I1 � ..._...__ _.._.. __._----i96 ! 1 O I II U I I I I # _/ ED SHED ELEVATED 1♦ I' i t I i 1 I 1 IN I 1 . . { l INV', 6' PVC TEEL RA V I,.J V ! I ` I J I ! I t2J B' d • 9 ! INV: • f191.8=. -- _ • RET•` ,. �1 I 1 EXISTING WALL i I I 1 1 i GRAVEL 11 STORAGE \\ I " `` o � � I I I BUNKERS \\ m o UN 3 j� r 1 1 1 1 1 1 m I , s \I� \ {\ 1 - - -t '-\ city 0/ S I I I III 1 POST (TYP.) I ) 11• ASPHALT 1 a^� \ \ . { { I \ O� OB I!} III I 1 ! II I ! 1 \ 1 ya — — ORAGE — — It I E 1 I AREA -195— — t WWE�D 111 won STEEL BOLLARD (TYP.) I�1•I I I I } \\ \I BUFFER I I I j l I } I I i {. • • EXISTING i I i Itl I 11 1 IM•II�I �j1CLASS IN 1_I INV. 15' CMP PAVED PARKINGWDy!` !_ WV. - t189.T BUFFER CONC1 1I I ii II i C�t , i III l 1 II RET./WALL 1 t94---___ I I I I \\ INV. 15' CMP I 1111 1 t --- 1 1 1 1 1 i I INV. - t190.1'- - - - 11 111 I ` ,II, .Iy 4 1 I t i \ 1 g}--- -\93•"-' ! I III I I I I I 11 1 1�9r9� APPROX. EDGE ❑GAS PtpMP 1 •I j 11111 1 1 OF GRAVEL I. 1 ( 1 1 I 11 I 1 } (LZ / — — • _ SHED SHED—,s3 'WILLOW PJQE �:dK.._ . _ _ 0 _._. —'— CDR I ri,l 11 '\ • ,_� 2' CEDA�i \ r _ \ - - -192-\ (! ) (f \ \ FILL PIPE _192- assessment� w1— m el — ee ewl • • ' • , . • -_--_ � � , — • F' t 1 1 m Il � der_ e• � er_e � �e� i � e� me per. - NDNt\ 85 SWIFT STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT LOCATION MAP r - 2000 urs �® narmoN EXISTING SITE PLAN ern RRurac -note DEC, 2006 1"=20' C1.1 P . NO. 05143 Deslero aalraue m Fmm-a a caroms Lm o eta Ter o talc. tall — —W — — !haler DRAKAM LM m coon awermc shawl anew >X NroRANr • wr-off d POWER POLE o GAICH !Awl umn' FOLE sal ® os+n,as wQ wri w m Of swINK/so os FINCIE _...—..._ aRANAM SW" CLASS ■ esl4Me011 SWIFT STREET .+eemer EXISTING GUY 0 / WIRE TO REMAIN A� TOPSOIL, SEED & ® MULCH ALL DI ED VEGETATE REAS I I 1 \ Y \ •R 3 N ( v MATC EXISTING / � a . LANDSCAP/Nb I I ., \ PAVE,VAENT GRADE \ y SCHgDULE) 1 (SEE DETAIL ON IT S,4EET C3.0) D I �13I1 i Q 1 L�Atl I l Ill I- cc NOTES �. �'� \\ I i 1 I o rr t. Iitlitles shown do not purport to oonatibrts or reprasernt all utilities t\\ � 1. DOSRNG located upon or od)=mt to the wr`+yd pnmiess. Existing utility y+ \W I` W 1 PAVED locotions are opprwdmate only. The tractor ehd "d veAy ap t'a \ y ` 1 1 utility oonlliats. All shah M reported to the Fnglneer. Thw y 1N y r p 1 1 t Z PARKING Contractor anal omtoctt Dig Sacs (B8A-3M-7433) prior to any oons6vction. " \ t 1 ' f 1 I Z 2. Bevotlom an HAW W and were trarwferrwd to the projeot site finrrn existing CEA control points. I �, . I j J // S Thin plan in not a boundary survey and Is not Intended to be used as one. "�... "j. j .I� ` •\( !I / 4. The pnrrpass of thin plop is to depict the proposed pokYnib g and sII y t • '• "I - . II Improvements associated with the project alb. I�l t1 v /' - IW I I \ 11 / 1 / If//�\g2-- aCC _CREATE__ NEW SHALLOW ---------GRASS DSWALE _ •-,`ate_ _ r—.-(SEED ONSHEETZ3.a) STOICIE CHECK t t w If AM (So DETAIL �NSHEETC3.0� I t I ILL I I �\ \\� EVt1 'P HI GRAPHIC SCALE !/ if . \. . �). j� 1I ETAINING WALL TO REMAIN CONC. PAD TO B 1 Inch 20 K E REMOVED // i l 1s '•/ - fr WETLAND FFER r _ _ I I 'IMPACT ± 3.'0 S� - • _ ; I�'3iVEW'PJIIOEE LANd,SCAPING/ SCH( p'ULEA I r i \` NEW Qr I � \ FFE aN CM / J.EV. - tti6.3Ir 30' FRONT \1 YARD SETBACK :• Iid -26 IGO t19 �\ II{I III I I I III • IIII •III I III III{ t � Il 6l / I SITE ENGINEER: -0� CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES. INC. P.O. BOX 485 SHELSUANE, VT 05482 8M-05-2323 FAX. HOi-88&??11 web: wwv:.cort H.cam rn�rer¢ar x•- - �u. anon �d JSO / CJG Y SIDE J� YARD LM :TBACK ATT[OrID SAV OWNER: II {I • ( {t 11 I II 1\ \ \ i I I t1 I 1411MGRA L 1 \\ I RECL J lW I' I 7s3 I PAVED �" PARKING I ' I I AREA, TOPS 6 .I+ REA- I \ 1 \\ i 1 I SEED & MULHI �% • 1. i t I � �1• it I s i u�r t 1 t,I I I 1 ! , u I• y- , 1 ��%� -� - — - t9b -_ .. - _1 •, + IIII I1 IIIiIII INSTL)A ENCE PR R m ° MATCH EXSTING QAVEMENT GRADE I I'• 1M1s II ANDITHOPGHO T Jt {{ 7asT1NG CO STRWCTIOhI S(EE 1 t�DE AIL ONSHEE7G$.Of &T (SEE6ETA1C bh - - SHEET C3.0) 0------- City of / / IIII + 1 IIiII 1 SO' 3UHi�n�g I1I , Ori ll I I it 1�1111 I I , II I � I ) � 1 6 1 I t I � W \\ \ 1 6'CLASS 11 W ,-•-- ! ,aA - O O ® ® I I I it l t1 t I NIIfI 1 1 1 I I I 1 { 1 ty \� \I� WETLAND cc t. __ l 1 1 ,A IIII1 I' I 1 t W\ Y �'t+ I BUFFER � ` j I it I l l 1 I I II // I {t— \/ { O REQUIREMENTS DOSTING PAVED PAW IllZONING II II IIII III`� (IIiI( tIII IhII I,l' I I) lI{ I`I. III II\ i CLASS WETLAND II� I = O COMMERCIAL • I I !I , I1 II (I {I / j / I L/1 --� LOTIZP:. LOTFROie. LOARGE: COV it f II III I (I iI• Ir � \\ LOT COVERAGE /e%PR PROPT EX. FRONT COVERAGE: 2% LANOSCAPINO SCHEDULE , - ` I I,1 I , PROPFRONT COVERAGE25% SPECIES COMMON NAME PLANT SIZE (NUMBER>� TOTAL COST J I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 y l { i --SETBACK'30 \ ! \ ,gj-•'--` r\g3 --- i —.,�` r FRONT YARD SETBACK' FT SIDE YARD SETflACIC TD FT REarx TARO sereaCrc ao FT RHODODENDRON RHODODENDRON 38'MT 8 $SB.SO $35T.00 normcosm NCumivsmuAnoN. SEEINSTALLATIONDETAILONSHEETC3.0. 1 II I I IIII I l f I 1 ,'III it l I\ \\ \ ,, \ i !_ t �, , T•_ �9y� y, t 1 SNOW REMOVAL AREA Dn � l , \ t \\, � � -' -`=-; \ \ --� . — • • —' t �.il -�• /_ . _ . _.. _ . . _ —„ SHED SHED ! -Tea-' � �, - - - - - -_-- —•-E I ' I I { I' , I _-79,3- \ \ \ `--__ .. ���--•-/ �/ 1 !,{ III \sg 'm %9> �� ' • \ •-taz---_---- �eiiCsrls�r riC�g ♦ '7 - I / l \ r \ t ! / j eI rn i { \ `~ \ \ \ \ \\ \ L.•�� �• • • of inl saw eeesess� r r eesase�• sw r seser••r--ir-� • • .,,• . -�� • • . - �\ • `!l \ •�4•� "Em weer we •ews� r r �� r r ese�s� es ��er i •ree�eeer r r ems. r r \I I I l m \IxI,I VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS, INC. PROJECT: PROPOSED PARKING & SITE IMPROVEMENTS 85 SWIFT STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT I LOCATION MAP -i 1 -x ■e5. i era;,. r�n� ,.Ly(T:eseseseses� PROPOSED SITE PLAN un DUI P G ImImmmt DEC, 2006 •rye 1" - 20' C2 .0 Pe01. NO. 05143 I' x O' 14.5 GA. WIRE MESH 30' HIGH AND BURIED 8' BELOW GRADE, HOOKED TO STEEL STAKES (WIRE MESH CAN BE EUMINATED FOR FENCE 24- OR LOWER) FILTER FABRIC CUPPED OR POST WIRED TO MESH, TO BE MIRAFI 10ONS OR APPROVED EQUAL FENCE HEIGHT 24' MIN 24' 30' • •POST 2 x WOOD S' 25' • SPACING METAL POST lo' 10' 4 x 4 WOOD 10, 10' 24' FILTER FABRIC TO BE CUPPED, BACKFlLLED AND TAMPED 6' BELOW GRADE STEEL OR WOOD STAKES SEE CHART AT RIGHT 1. INSTALL SILT FENCES AT TOES OF UNPROTECTED SLOPES AND AS PARALLEL TO CONTOURS AS POSSIBLE. CURVE THE ENDS OF THE FENCE UP INTO THE MOMSDREMOVE SEDRIENT WHEN ACCUMULATED TO HALFTIME MORT OF THE FENCE. cONTRAcToR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCES AT THE TOE OF ALL FLLED OR UNPROTECTED SLOPES CREATED DURING CONSTRUCTION, NOT NECESSARILY REFLECTED ON THE FINAL PLANS SILT FENCES ARE To BE MAINTAINED UNTIL SLOPES ARE STABNRED. 2. WDVEN WIRE FENCE To BE FASTENED SECURELY To POSTS WITH WIRE TES OR STAPLE 3. FILTER CLOTH TO BE FASTENED SECURELY TO WOVEN WIRE FENCE WIN TIES SPACED EVERY 2.4' AT TOP. MD SE:CIION, AND BOTTOM. 4. V EN TWO SECTIONS OF RLTER CLOTH ADJOIN EACH OTHER THEY SHALL BE OVERLAPPED BY e', FOLDED AND STAPLED. 7mxx (3 IL) NK COURE ROLTU FLOW EXISTING GROUND ....�.... 1... ....... OFF, n 1 1 1 EROSION CONTROL MATTING IN TOPSOIL .. _ ....... DITCHES w/PROFILE GRADES EXCEEDING 5XL STAPLE AS PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. CWAW WTH T wLID NATIVE EX. COMPACTED! �— �SUBGRADE BOOAXI OR �ROVEDI EQUAL SUBGRADE YPI & PAVED PARKING SECMON N.fi.3. � ►...� ► ] 1 lall�l HE ROOT FLAW OF THE TWIE NOOK KT N 10— (4IL NNW" TRENCH sr REVEL tl EL JUN 13 Zoo - CitY of So. Burlington RUE SLOPE OOWIISTREAM DWOPE OF STRUCTURE: (m/m) C( 0.36 0.30 Q25 0.20 eta 0.10 MA�C 11 �TM� 30 N 41 N N TN OJ5 inAm OR FLATM FLOW UE SLOPE SLID Pons'A' IAW WE HW EA MAN THE FLOW 111E POW Y' A 1Dsn B O m MAONNO j .�11.' 13 t {. I .. .. WOMAN DEPTH OF OOURE 1S— TO 45— N= FIACED N aw►EL (Oe TO 1.5 ff.) ROW U E 0 IS— (04 e.) OPTOFNCE - •iv! • I! RACE DONO WAM WNICIINE SLNN GENERAL NOTES: w■rs 1. Utilities shown do not purport to constitute or represent all utilities located upon or adjacent to the surveyed premises. Existing utility locations are approximate only. The Contractor shall field verify all utility conflicts. All discrepancies shall be reported to the Engineer. The Contractor shall contact Dig Safe (888-344-7233) prior to any construction. 2. The Contractor shall repair/restore all disturbed areas (on or off the site) as a direct or Indirect result of the construction. 3. All grassed areas shall be maintained until full vegetation In established. 4. Maintain all trees outside of construction limits. 5. The Contractor shall be responsible for all work necessary for complete and operable facilities and utilities. 8. The Contractor shall submit shop drawings for all Items and materials Incorporated into the site work. Work shall not begin on any Item until shop drawing approval Is granted. 7. In addition to the requirements set In these plans and specifications, the Contractor shall complete the work in accordance with all permit conditions and any local Public Works Standards. S. The tolerance for finish grades for all pavement, walkways and lawn areas shall be 0.1 feet. 9. Any dewatering necessary for the completion of the sitework shall be considered as part of the contract and shall be the Contractors responsibility. 10. The Contractor shall Install the electrical, cable and telephone services In accordance with the utility companies requirements. 11. Existing pavement and tree stumps to be removed shall be disposed of at an approved off —site location. All pavement cuts shall be made with a pavement saw. 12. If there are any conflicts or Inconsistencies with the plans or specifications, the Contractor shall contact the Engineer for verification before work continues on the item In question. SITE ENGINEER: —0� CIVIL ENGINEEkING ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. BOX 485 SHELBURNE, VT 05482 W-985-2.T25 FAX:--985-2271 web: uanv.ces- ., rnPrn¢er Foos - Aa. roan N1mrID JSO I CJG JLM APPROM SAV OWNER: VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS, INC. PROJECT: PROPOSED PARKING & SITE IMPROVEMENTS 85 SWIFT STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT LI LOCATION MAP I" =- 2000' I DITR I clam I IMMON I SITE DETAILS PLAN mu DWNNO NUI®RB DEC, 2006 ecus AS SHOWN C3.0 PM. NO. 05143 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 June 27, 2007 Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. 85 Swift Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a draft agenda for the July 10, 2007 Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. cc: James Mullowney CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 June 27, 2007 Easy Self Storage, Inc. 61 South Willard Street Burlington, VT 05407 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburi.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the July 10, 2007 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts property you own. Under Title 24, Section 4464 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, r—� "\-\- Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CIAL ENGINEERING EERI! G AJSJCIAIVE-0:5), INC, 928 Falls Road P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 June 12t", 2007 To: Ray Belair Zoning Administrator City of South Burlington South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Proposed Parking/Site Improvements Vermont Gas Systems Inc., 85 Swift St. Dear Ray, Phone: 802-985-2323 Fax: 802-985-2271 E-Mail: mail@cea-vt.com Please find attached a site plan application, five (5) full size and one (1) half size plan set, an abutters list and an application fee check in the amount of $185.00 associated with the improvements for the Vermont Gas Systems Inc. site. The plans call for the addition of two new parking areas, one in the front for customers and one in the back for employees. In addition, Vermont Gas intends to repave the existing northwest customer parking area as a maintenance measure. This is not shown on the plans. If you should have any questions of concerns, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, A04a- Q__j JeffrOlesky, P.E. /j so Enclosures: Site Plan Application Five (5) and One (1) Half-size Plan Set Abutters List Application Fee Check Cc: James Mullowney CEA file #05143 Permit Number SP-�- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) qd. 119 ?a. 417-4-le 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) G,7.7rn e zs I. 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address, phone & fax #): P o. gJx +Vl , VT 054 02 P- r (o3 -9A-72- 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: QS Sw,- 4 SI•. 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) 17oO - 00065 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) 6avnc c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) lo, U S5 S.1=' d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) E7 "5-Ii na e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) N one f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees): 113 -CmOuye5 g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable): �tp�vx . q53 �i F o F Glass I1 l 8) LOT COVERAGE Total Parcel Size: + 1 b3, oZZ Sq. Ft. a) Building: Existing 'I ! % l I(o,(P55 sq. ft. Proposed It I % / I Ion UG S sq. ft. b) Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existin ?. 0 % l e& 02o sq. ft. Proposed 4W - 3 % / 'I D 1361 sq. ft. c) Front yard (along each street) Existing ZS-Z % / 7-0152 sq. ft. Proposed 1S-2 % 2517 Z sq. ft. d) Total area to be disturbed during construction (sq. ft.) %oo0 * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations): $ b) Landscaping: $ 330•o0 = 3`l0 & 1%,000 -®- c) Other site improvements (please list with cost): Ti' 11 4 v0. o o Air 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out): NIA b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): N J A c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out): NI A 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION: -7 A" — S %70 2 WAIM E 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION Mon. 'Eti. 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE: 14) ABUTTERS (please list all abutting landowner. Include mailing address. Also include those across a street or right-of-way. You may use a separate sheet if necessary) See- !;,*tVrCA 15) SITE PLAN AND FEE A site plan shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I V x 17") of the site plan must be submitted. A site plan application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the site plan application (see Exhibit A). 3 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. A Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I C 1 REVIEW AUTHORITY: VDevelopment Review Board ❑ Administrative Officer I have reviewed this site plan application and find it to be: Complete ❑ Incomplete (� 3 UT- irector of Aanning & Zoning or Desijnee Date 4 Abutters List for Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. 85 Swift Street, S. Burlington VT Tax Map #1700-00046 0670-00010 Easy Self Storage Inc. Ten Farrell St. Corporation 61 South Willard Street 10 Farrell St. Burlington, VT 05407 S. Burlington, VT 05403 1700-56-58 1050-00014 Adam Booska Carolyn Mitchell 8432 Firewheel Dr. 14 Lindenwood Dr. Frisco, TX 75034 S. Burlington, VT 05403 1700-64-66 1050-00016 Colleen Booska Patricia Austin 64 Swift St. 16 Lindenwood Dr. S. Burlington, VT 05403 S. Burlington, VT 05403 1700-00070 1050-00018 JR Development LLC Brian & Jeanne Shea 29 Vale Dr. 18 Lindenwood Dr. S. Burlington, VT 05403 S. Burlington, VT 05403 1700-00095 1050-20-22 City of South Burlington Mark, Fred & Eleanor Smith 575 Dorset St. 22 Lindenwood Dr. S. Burlington, VT 05403 S. Burlington, VT 05403 0670-00007 Northwest Regional Correctional Facility — State of Vermont 7 Farrell St. S. Burlington, VT 05403 9 SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 August 3, 2006 James Mullowney PO Box 467 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: DRB Minutes — 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Mullowney: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved minutes from the July 18, 2006 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, CJ Betsy Mc onough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. r DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 JULY 2006 3. Continued Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-06-35 of F & M Development to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of. 1) 309 residential units in six buildings, 2) subdividing two parcels of 24.458 acres into eight lots, 3) a 73-unit multi -family dwelling, 4) a 4,430 sq. ft. expansion of an indoor recreation facility, 5) a 63-unit congregate care housing facility and 6) an existing 16,000 sq. ft. television studio and office building. The amendment consists of: 1) increasing the number of units at 410 Farrell Street from 73 units to 74 units, and 2) constructing a 12'x14' accessory structure, Farrell Street: Mr. Belair noted that the applicant has asked for a continuance until the next meeting. Ms. Quimby moved to continue Final Plat Application #SD-06-35 until 1 August 2006. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 4. Sketch Plan Application #SD-06-46 of Jane Boisvert for a boundary line adjustment between 99 Holmes Road and 95 Holmes Road: Ms. Boisvert explained that her home is located on her brother's estate. They are going to purchase the lot from the estate and would like to add some land for a vegetable garden. The other lots on Holmes Road would be sold. No issues were raised. 5. ublic Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-06-71 of Vermont Gas Systems to end a planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a 38,478 sq. ft. building for general office use with a bank with drive-in service. The amendment consists of adding 1000 sq. ft. of mezzanine space within the Vermont Gas Building, 85 Swift St: Mr. Mullowney explained that the addition is entirely within the building. They need to secure an area with distribution lines. There is a 4-space parking waiver being requested. No issues were raised. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-06-71 of Vermont Gas -2- DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 18 JULY 2006 Systems subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Birmingham seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Sketch Plan Application #SD-06-48 of Allen Road Land Company for a planned unit development consisting of 30 dwelling units in four buildings, with an existing single family dwelling to remain, 725 Hinesburg Road: Mr. O'Leary said this plan scales buildings down from the last plan. Buildings are 3 stories with separate garage units. One building will have garages underneath. The road will be 50 feet and will meet Public Works standards. The existing house will remain. Ms. Carlson asked how far buildings are from the property line. Mr. O'Leary said one is 15 feet. Ms. Carlson said this will eliminate all the foliage there which keeps water from backing up into their backyards. Another resident was concerned about the loss of a large pine tree and with having lights from parking cars shining into her home. Mr. O'Leary showed the path of drainage to the wetland. Ms. Carlson said 2 large 30-ft apple trees will have to come down along with other trees in order to put in those drainage lines. She said those trees take up a lot of the water. She also asked why one building can't be moved further from the property line. Mr. Birmingham felt this was better than the original plan but also asked if the western- most building can be set further from the property line. Mr. O'Leary said that would result in a loss of units. They are down from 33 to 30 units now and will probably lose more when they comply with the 50-foot road width. Ms. Dopp asked if the historic barn will be torn down. Mr. O'Leary said it will. Ms. Dopp said she is investigating its historic value. Ms. O'Brien said the Foxcroft people had a meeting regarding their expired stormwater permit. She wanted the DRB to be aware of what this might mean to that issue. Mr. Behr said this property will have to deal with its own stormwater treatment on site. Ms. LaRose said that the Director of Planning & Zoning has said there is no anticipated stormwater affect on the Foxcroft property. -3- I ) \(Tp ��� DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 20 JUNE 2006 Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-06-37 of Edgar Welch subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Sketch Plan Application #SD-06-38 of City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport for a three lot subdivision consisting of a 62,172 sq. ft. lot (lot A), a 3212 sq. ft. lot (lot B) and the remaining airport property, Aviation Avenue: Mr. Leinwhol said there will be no changes in the area of the main terminal. The Airport built a new aviation support hangar, and the Airport and BCDC are entering into an agreement to lease this hangar and the parking area that goes with it. The subdivision is part of the legal agreement for this. Mr. Dinklage reminded the applicant that this property still remains part of the Airport PUD. 7. Sketch Plan Application #SD-06-44 of Peter Cherourny and Susan Jacques for a boundary line adjustment between 43 Pheasant Way and 15 Quail Run: Mr. Jones said both parties are in agreement. Mr. Dinklage asked if this action would create any non -compliances. Mr. Jones said it would not. 8. Sketch plan application #SD-06-39 of Vermont Gas Systems, Inc., to amend a planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a 38,478 sq. ft. building for general office use and a bank with drive -through service. The amendment consists of adding 1000 sq. ft. of mezzanine space within the Vermont Gas building, 85 Swift St: Mr. Beck said they will be asking for a 4 space parking waiver. No other issues were raised. 9. Site Plan Application #SP-06-31 of Technology Park Partners to construct a 72,000 sq. ft. general office building, 55 Community Drive: -3- 1 � SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 August 3, 2006 James Mullowney PO Box 467 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: DRB Minutes - 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Mullowney: For your records, enclosed is a copy of the approved minutes from the June 20, 2006 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, � PZoningg Betsy M DPlanning &Ass nt Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 19, 2006 James Mullowney PO Box 467 Burlington, VT 05402-0467 Re: Vermont Gas — 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Mullowney: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on July 18, 2006 (effective 7/18/06). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the land records within 180 days (must be recorded by 1/12/07) of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT: 7005 1820 0004 3158 0321 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE:-' �O NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT OF INTEREST 40 &V R14/5 W Pi 1r� �Ctr f 4t-k / Ur if S�— Eoz�-&'70� �eerS 5OVAAj w,0 tA`", -t 1 %22 /�a�r� �7✓� I 5ke4 S�' '�' �3' VT DJ i'O TS R L- s o UA 1 ,� C— $ _ c3 , C, r1A/ -C V11ja J�'e ski Bla►� sQ—o�Y� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: ' �-' NAMEMAII Mr. ennDmec .-..�- ,......____ �uJc-`�I(AI�a,J --- -• ------���� (¢ `(�9y CL92cLE rrwJCl.l Ur' IN 1 tKtS T S4)—©G S Jr�0 1 2-; SGLAa�\ l l U/q 5o% ICL.P /3 6 r)'Iij.wsQ Ad L167 on VT fro, p AL AlNn ;tx;I G Q� tJl/ Q ;, /Ce I CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Interested Persons Record and Service List Under the 2004 revisions to Chapter 117, the Development Review Board (DRB) has certain administrative obligations with respect to interested persons. At any hearing, there must be an opportunity for each person wishing to achieve interested person status to demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). The DRB must keep a written record of the name, address and participation of each person who has sought interested person status. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b). A copy of any decision rendered by the DRB must be mailed to every person or body appearing and having been heard by the DRB. 24 V.S.A. § 4461(b)(3). Upon receipt of notice of an appeal to the environmental court, the DRB must supply a list of interested persons to the appellant in five working days. 24 V.S.A. § 4471(c). HEARING DATE: -7 NAME MAILING ADDRESS PROJECT O 131 C_L M cb FINTEREST V 54 t VT J �d ys S2� Jr U 5'yT- (f t2►.5 C-A;- �c1�NALl�� Ac-�WNrl' IVY 12205 C A'� ►�c� iJ t C" de r C Ge- r�,�)V CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 13, 2006 James Mullowney PO Box 467 Burlington, VT 05402-0467 Re: 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Mullowney: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 at 7:30 P.M. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, C--- kT�A* Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 1 � CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 q% f a June 28, 2006 James Mullowney PO Box 467 Burlington, VT 05402-0467 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." Please call our office at 846-4106 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. iITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON I DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 June 28, 2006 Vermont Gas Systems c/o Jay Mullowney 85 Swift Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." Please call our office at 846-4106 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 June 28, 2006 Pat & Terese Ayer PO Box 9451 South Burlington, VT 05407 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. 1 % ITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTOlm DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4106 June 28, 2006 Carolyn Mitchell 14 Lindenwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development that abuts your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. You will not receive this notice if any subsequent or continued public hearings for the same applications are required. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. Instructi ------------- _-____-- GUITAR INSTRUCTION Berklee graduate with classical back- ground offers lessons in guitar, theory, and ear training. Individ- ualized, step-by-step approach. I enjoy teaching all ages/styles/ Levels. Rick Belford 864-7195, rickbetf@verizon.net GUITAR LESSONS Instruction avail. at Burlington Guitar and Amp w/Bob Wagner. Develop your ear, technique, theory and im- prov concepts. All ages/ Levels. 802.863.4613 or bob@burlington guitar.com. Studio/ Rehearsal ----------------------- COSMIC HILL Project Recording Studio. Great equipment. Great space. Instrumentation and ar- rangements available. 30 years experience. 496-3166 Moretown. MOBILE RECORDING FOR HIRE Mobile Pro Tools System for hire. Live recording system for your band. Demos, live albums, etc. Can master or you can have done. 846-7515. ----------------------- Call to Artists _--..------------------- MODELS WANTED: for artistic and fashion projects. Excellent opportunity for free portfolio and experience. Contact David RusseLt Photography, 373-1912, email rusldp@juno.com, website http://www.rustdp.com. OPENINGS BURLINGTON CITY COMMISSIONS/BOARDS On Monday, August 7, 2006, the Burlington City Council will fill vacancies on the following City Commissions/Boards: Chittenden County Regional Plan- ning Comm. Term Expires 7/31/08 One Opening Chittenden Solid Waste District (Alt.) Term Expires 5/31/08 One Opening Board of Tax Appeals Term Expires 6/30/09 One Opening Town Service Officer Term Expires 4/15/07 One Opening received in the Clerk/Treasurer's Office by 4:30 p.m., Wednesday, August 2, 2006. Applicants must be nominated by a member of the City Council to be considered for a position; a list of Council members is also available at the Clerk/Treasurer's Office. Please call the Clerk/Treasurer's Office at 865- 7136 for further information. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOP- MENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, July 18, 2006 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Final Plat application #SD-06- 45 of The Snyder South Pointe Limited Partnership to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of 31 single family dwellings and one (1) existing single family dwelling on 26.8 acres. The amendment consists of modifying footprint Lots #25, 30, and 31, 1700 Spear Street. 2. Conditional Use application #CU-06-03 of Fessou Enterprises,' LLC for conditional use approval under Section 14.10, Condi- tional. Use Review of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. The request is for permission to convert 9324 square feet of space to personal instruc- tion school (dance) use, 1820 Shelburne Road. 3. Final Plat application #SD-06- 47 of John P. Larkin to amend a planned unit development consist- ing of: 1) a 10,064 sq. ft. mixed use commercial building, 2) a 3,100 sq. ft. short-order restau- rant, and 3) a 24 unit multi -family dwelling. The amendment consists of: 1) reducing the number of units in the mutti-family dwelling to 23 units and 2) site modifications, 388, 400, and 410 Shelburne Road. 4. FinaL Plat application #SD-06- 51 of Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. to amend a planned unit develop- ment consisting of the existing 26,190 sq. ft Vermont Gas building for general office use and a bank with 38,478 sq. ft. drive -through service. The amendment consists of adding 1000 sq. ft. of mezza- nine space within the Vermont Gas building, 85 Swift Street. 5. Preliminary Plat application #SD-06-49 and Final Plat applica- tion #SD-06-50 of McDonalds Cor- poration to: 1) raze existing 3481 sq. ft. of short-order restaurant, and 2) construct a new 3480 sq. ft. short-order restaurant, 1205 Williston Road. 6. Preliminary Plat application #SD-06-52 and Final Plat applica- tion #SD-06-53 of Michael Gervais to amend a previously approved plan for a 1267 sq. ft. general office building. The amendment consists of a planned unit devel- opment to construct one (1) ad- ditional principal building of 1800 sq. ft. to be used for auto service and repair, 3097 Williston Road. 7. Preliminary Plat application #SD-06-54 of John Illick to subdi- vide a 177 acre parcel developed with a 272,200 sq. ft. mixed use building into 16 lots, 30 Com- munity Drive. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board STATE OF VERMONT CHITTEN DEN COUNTY, SS. IN RE: T.R. and B.W. Vermont Family Court Chittenden County Docket No. 192/93-4-06 CnJv uune [u, Cuub, and the accom- panyinq Affidavit, the Court finds tha, ice of process cannot, with,„, diligence, be made upon Jessica Wilson other than by publication. It is therefore, ORDERED, AD- JUDGED AND DECREED that notice of a disposition hearing to the parental fitness of Jessica Wilson, mother of T.R. and B.W., to be held on Wednesday, July 19, 2006, at 2:30 p.m. at the Family Court of Vermont, Costello Courthouse, 32 Cherry St., Burlington, Vermont, shall be published for two (2) consecutive weeks in Seven Days, a newspaper of general circula- tion reasonably calculated to give notice to Jessica Wilson. A copy of this order shall be mailed to Jes- sica Wilson if her address can ever be determined. Hon. Brian J. Grearson Family Court Judge 6-20-06 STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. IN RE: T.R. and B.W. Vermont Family Court Chittenden County Docket No. 192/93-4-06 CnJv NOTICE OF HEARING TO: Jesssica Wilson, mother of T.R. and B.W. You are hereby notified that a dis- position hearing to consider your parental fitness to parent T.R. and B.W. will be held on July 19, 2006 at 2:30 p.m. at the Family Court of Vermont, Chittenden County, 32 Cherry Street, Burlington, Ver- mont. You are notified to appear in connection with this case. Hon. Brian J. Grearson Family Court Judge 6-20-06 For Sale ------------------------- 36 ACRES IN WESTFORD Working sugarbush and possible building lot. Land has deeded right-of-way on unimproved access road. Power nearby, private with some views. $85,000. Call Ron, 802-893-2201. CLASSIC DOWNTOWN VICTORIAN Vergennes: Make your dream come true by owning this Victorian on Main Street. All original, all clas- sic, all yours! Special financing available. $384,900. Lynn Jack- son, Century 21 Jack Associates, 802-877-2134. COLCHESTER W/LAKE ACCESS Very charming year-round Living w/lake views, deeded beach ac- cess and mooring. This bright 2- bedroom home w/an open floor plan offers an updated kitchen and bath. Don't waste any more time and spend this summer at the beach! Only $165,000. Call Sarah at 655-3333 x. 255. COLCHESTER! Great investment opportunity or starter home! Very well maintained and clean 2-bed- room ranch w/a 1-year homebuyer warranty, Quiet neighborhood just minutes to Burlington and the Lake. All this for only $163,000. So, don't miss out! CaLL Sarah at 655-3333 x. 255. schools. Move -in condition! ( for appt: 802-238-2679 or en kaboucha@hotmaiL.com. . FAIRFIELD CONDOS FOR Si Rare 1-2-bedroom condos. Toti renovated, 5-Star energy e cient construction/applianc Country setting, convenient cation. Close to rail trail/skii $149,000-$185,000, availa July. Contact Jim at (802)61 2442, JCGDLLC@adelphia.net. FARMHOUSE FIXER UPPER Pant Four Corners: Sound charming, is! Classic farmhouse needs so Loving touches, well worth 1 effort! Just 30 minutes to BL ington. Lynn Jackson, Century Jack Associates, 802-877-2134, GRANDVIEW CONDO FOR SA 960 SF townhouse with 1-ba 2-bedroom, gas heat and wat W/D and dishwasher. New rc and siding, newer paint and ftof ing, low dues. Asking $150,OC 802-878-0280. GREAT LOCATION! Waterfro park location! Fantastic vie, of lake/Adirondacks, right downtown Burlington. Unique 3 floor flat in a cool building wi 15 condos. Very affordable pric $249,900. 863-9100. SPINNER P off -campus apar is now leasirl Apply individually a 2 - 4 bedroom a All apartments Rent includes all I and wirel LIKE NEW WESTFORD HOME New price! Almost new, custom 3- bedroom, 2.5-bath colonial with fabulous eat -in kitchen, gracious entry foyer, and French doors to the office/family room. $289,900. 863-9100. MOBILE HOME FOR SALE 1992, 14' x 70', 3 Bedroom, 1 bath. Range and Refrigerator included. Avail- able September. $15,000/OBO (does not include transport). 802-363-1737. Permit Number SD- - CITY OF SOUTH BUFLINGTON APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) L/6 4 M0N7 6,'?q5 -sVS ,C-M 5, rd c:.. -, '9�;, 5a / F -r < : 'T/- /( trl�_.Lr :i/�7i:,GGf!//%.���+f/��i :SSf►�S«1Q 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) VOL - /J'Y C�2 41-77 - V78 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) I/9/�9,+✓T GAS 5��T H 5 T S .5 01J 1 t yr 0 yy 3 _ 81c► - Ns �/ Sf 3 --587� C�F,ax� 4) CONTACT PERSON (Person who will receive all correspondence from Staff. Include name, address phone& fax #) 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS VV411l01V-r 6-4S 5Y6rEMs J? " S'WIF 7- 57 0v7-1,QU2Li�G'rC��, V 7 �s ,3 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office) / 70 0 - 000 19.S 7) DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) TVJ a v is emu,Lpir+j4�,.; b) Proposed uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) &4 MV c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) t='F . d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) x i .5 -/A) ca— e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) N 1!), /0 r- f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) ��.3 �M�L o yEES g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. 8) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? Y- b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or their associated 50' buffers? N0 c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the Development Review Board. Please submit the following with this application: 1. a site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City's Wetlands Map. 2. response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria). 9) LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a) Size of Parcel: 9 % %. 21 (acres /sq. ft.) b) Building Coverage: Existing square feet 6,73 % Proposed square feet 'F' 73 % c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing hig,, D;4 square feet G % 2 Proposed % ` SO-2 square feet 5-6 % d) Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing 75- 3 5 square feet % ✓ % Proposed 1675 3 6" square feet 10) AREA DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION:y sq. ft. * *Projects disturbing more than on -half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 11) WAIVERS REQUESTED a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks, height, parking, etc.) that the applicant is seeking jqg""-/,u ,- 12) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations) $ 70 UCH U b) Landscaping (see Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations) $ f411-4 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) / 6, 13) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out) 14) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 15) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION- /11 - F 16) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE SEPT 30 , E006 17) ABUTTING LANDOWNERS — please list abutting landowners, including those across any streets. You may attach a separate sheet. `-E c A I" TA c H c D ifGE T" 16) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x l 7") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledgq. "ATURE OF AP ICANT �� J� A4eollle— 640L�� Y�V SIGNATU RE OF PROPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: )AO I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: �omplete ❑ Incomplete of Planning & Zoning or Designee ' Date 4 Adjacent Property Owners Jerry & Martha Couillard P.O. Box 310 Milton, VT 05468 Easy Self Storage Inc 61 South Willard Street Burlington, VT 05407 Carolyn Mitchell 14 Lindenwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Patricia Austen 16 Lindenwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Brian & Jeanne Shea 18 Lindenwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Mark, Fred, & Eleanor Smith 22 Lindenwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner Date: July 10, 2006 Re: Agenda #5, #SD-06-71, Vermont Gas Systems Final Plat Plan application #SD-06-71 of Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. to amend a planned unit development consisting of the existing 26,190 sq. ft Vermont Gas building for general office use and a bank with 38,478 sq. ft. drive -through service. The amendment consists of adding 1000 sq. ft. of mezzanine space within the Vermont Gas building, 85 Swift Street. The proposal to increase the square footage of the building by adding 1,000 square feet of mezzanine space is entirely interior to the building. Therefore, the only potential issues of note are increased parking needs and potential estimated traffic increases. The applicant appeared before the DRB for sketch plan review on June 20, 2006 (minutes enclosed). Parking Based on the Land Development Regulations, the subject site with the added mezzanine will require 96 parking spaces. The site plan depicts 92 spaces, all currently in existence. This shortfall is 4 spaces, or 4.1 %. Staff fully supports a parking waiver for this amount. 1. The Development Review Board should grant the applicant a 4-space, or 4.1 % parking waiver. All of the parking spaces provided on site meet the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (SBLDR) with respect to size, orientation, and location. Traffic The increase in 1,000 SF of office space is estimated to generate an additional 1.49 PM Peak Vehicle Trip Ends. The applicant should pay traffic impact fees based on this amount. Staff finds the proposal to be otherwise in compliance with all of the criteria specified in Section 15.18 of the SBLDR and recommends that the Board approve Final Plat Application #SD-06-71 subject to the numbered conditional items above. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 20 JUNE 2006 Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-06-37 of Edgar Welch subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Sketch Plan Application #SD-06-38 of City of Burlington/Burlington International Airport for a three lot subdivision consisting of a 62,172 sq. ft. lot (lot A), a 3212 sq. ft. lot (lot B) and the remaining airport property, Aviation Avenue: Mr. Leinwhol said there will be no changes in the area of the main terminal. The Airport built a new aviation support hangar, and the Airport and BCDC are entering into an agreement to lease this hangar and the parking area that goes with it. The subdivision is part of the legal agreement for this. Mr. Dinklage reminded the applicant that this property still remains part of the Airport PUD. 7. Sketch Plan Application #SD-06-44 of Peter Cherourny and Susan Jacques for a boundary line adjustment between 43 Pheasant Way and 15 Quail Run: Mr. Jones said both parties are in agreement. Mr. Dinklage asked if this action would create any non -compliances. Mr. Jones said it would not. 8. Sketch plan application #SD-06-39 of Vermont Gas Systems, Inc., to amend a planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a 38,478 sq. ft. building for general office use and a bank with drive -through service. The amendment consists of adding 1000 sq. ft. of mezzanine space within the Vermont Gas building, 85 Swift St: Mr. Beck said they will be asking for a 4 space parking waiver. No other issues were raised. 9. Site Plan Application #SP-06-31 of Technology Park Partners to construct a 72,000 sq. ft. general office building, 55 Community Drive: -3- COMBINED DATA PARCELS A & B #69 & #85 I Area, Density and Dimensional Requirements Proposed (wl III I Allowable Proposed R.O.W. Adjustment) I Minimum Lot Size: 40,000 s.f. 283,575 s.f. 277.891 s.f. a ICI Total Acreage: 4 Acres(PUD) 6.51 Acres 6.38 Acres Number of Lots: 2 2 Minimum Lot Frontage: 350 feet 685 feet 685 feet Maximum Building Coverage: 30.0% 8.73% Maximum Front Yard Coverage: 30.0% 39.55m 8.73% (UNCHANGED) 31.57. III l H III Maximum Impervious Area: 70.0% 56.8% 56.0% 1 I Type of Land Use: Commercial Office Building 1 I N ® Includes sidewalk improvements requested by the City of South Burlington. � t I 0 1 4i Northwest FacAt yRegional Cdrection Focdlt \I T. 7 ,,, ALL N';CF�' SAFIY EASEMENTS FOR THE I'FiOPOB®,3oEIVALx AND I' `I ."~n` r mn SK�AT71 ACFp83 THE COULLAFD PROPHifY HAVE NOT BE81 CBTAINM eas FfEVOCABLE OFFER of DECIr ATION ALCNO &AWrr STREET Y "" .Ce•'•»in To THE CRY of So. BIFiHoioli 1 �JEYfAIX 11'41 TO B! D XV® AM BIKE PATH TR LEGEND — EXISTING CONTOUR —336 PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPERTY LINE O IRON PIN o GOING MONUMENT --SS— GRAVITY SEWER LINE --- -- W — WATER LINE — — E — OVERHEAD ELECTRIC — — G — GAS LINE a SEWER MANHOLE ® STOfat MANHOLE I( HYDRANT s WATER SHUT-OFF VALVE `a+ OVERHEAD ELECTRIC POLE ® CATCH BASIN » LIGHT POLE SIGN O EXISTING TREES rwvvvw-w'� EDGE OF BRUSH/WOODS --C----C-- EXISTING LNG FENCE --------- WETLAND \; o `m am l Card}n WCHELL Potrtco Brtea vGod lathy BOO -WA Jeonne fZEMINC _YEA I I 114XIX,'l0I \ 1 -7- - .� u®omaoo `o` wws L LOCATION MAP SCALE: 1 PRCPOINED BLIP PATH — - l7CiF30 DOBTNO 8CEY/AL1C TO �. ___,..__....,..._.._..� MATCH EDGE OF PAVEMEW ! / / --PARCEL B #85 IIt _ ®®®� ®Sate as a /ab, _W gee I I UAfiD \ '�\ I p I I , _— IT II I ' L- —_ aM II Arlo —�—�'�— iNrn"Wt am S)etwmaR R; I ` ' I 'GFbfklp aW 4 1 I I jj);� ,_, •L--i• � I'I .� 1 � � \J ll I 1 I i\ !!I. I 4 I //���. \\ 1 \\\\.\ III(\• \I�y ll 1 I U 'i � \0 FFE w'y I \ ' Qty of II;IIII'iI South 8ur/Agton RECEIVE® 'z \� �,- -_ - -- v -- -- --� JUN 2 3 2006 Roph and 1.\ 0,0ce I City of ARUZZA I South Buravgton "-31 SAY "� � .11 �`° �"�"� SWI STREET P.U.D. \ t-3t-0I SAY RE81 ad ARg1, A 9 AND P 6-7-00 SAV ADDED SIDEWALK. UTILITY PADS 57, 69 & 85 SWIFT STREET GRAPHIC SCALE to GF v e-'°-' SAV ADD WETLAND NPADT• EXTEND SIDEWALK OVERALL SITE PLAN PA o SAV REVISED PROPOSED FUTURE ROADWAY t Date, Ch'k'd Revision � /5226 D � T LIN T N VERMONT Drawn by MJW Date APRIL, 1997 SHEET T mcn 40 IL Checked by JP Scale 1' = W. CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. SHELBURNE, VERMONT Approved by SAV Project No. 97150 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: Cathyann LaRose, Associate Planner Lcl Date: June 14, 2006�' Re: Agenda #5, #SD-06-39, Vermont Gas Systems Sketch plan application #SD-06-39 of Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. to amend a planned unit development consisting of the existing 26,190 sq. ft Vermont Gas building for general office use and a bank with 38,478 sq. ft. drive -through service. The amendment consists of adding 1000 sq. ft. of mezzanine space within the Vermont Gas building, 85 Swift Street. The proposal to increase the square footage of the building by adding 1,000 square feet of mezzanine space is entirely interior to the building. Therefore, the only potential issues of note are increased parking needs and potential estimated traffic increases. Parking Based on the Land Development Regulations, the subject site with the added mezzanine will require 96 parking spaces. The site plan depicts 92 spaces, all currently in existence. This shortfall is 4 spaces, or 4.1 %. Staff fully supports a parking waiver for this amount. 1. The Development Review Board should grant the applicant a 4-space, or 4.1 % parking waiver. All of the parking spaces provided on site meet the South Burlington Land Development Regulations (SBLDR) with respect to size, orientation, and location. Traffic The increase in 1,000 SF of office space is estimated to generate an additional 1.49 PM Peak Vehicle Trip Ends. The applicant should pay traffic impact fees based on this amount. Staff finds the proposal to be otherwise in compliance with all of the criteria specified in Section 15.18 of the SBLDR and recommends that the Board advise the applicant to proceed to the preliminary and final plat application. �Lq Permit Number SD- : 0-9 3 APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION SKETCH PLAN REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. For amendments, please provide pertinent information only. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Vermont —Gas GVst-emsf Tnc--, 85 Swi ft Street, Sn>f h Bur1 i ngt on 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #)Vol . 199, pp 4 7 7 - 4 7 8 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address; phone and fax #)Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. 85 Swift Street, So. Burlington, VT 05403 T:863-4511 F:658-3926 4) APPLICANT'S LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY (fee simple, option, etc.) Owner 5) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) James J. Mullowney PO Box 467, Burlington, VT 05402 T:863-8899x339 F:863,8872 6) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. , 85 Swift Street South Burlington, VT 7) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor's Office)1 7 0 0 - 0 0 0 8 5 8) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing Uses on Property (including description and size,of each separate use) Three office buildings b) Proposed Uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to ,main) Same c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain) 88,118 S.F. { lJd �7 l� o� e No Text d) Proposed height of building (if applicable) Existin e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) None f) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) 9) LOT COVERAGE a) Building: Existing R % Proposed 8 , 7 3 b) Overall (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing_5 6 % Proposed 5 6 % c) Front yard (along each street) Existing 31 . 5 % Proposed 31 . 5 % 10) TYPE OF EXISTING OR PROPOSED -ENCUMBRANCES ON PROPERTY (easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc.) None 11) PROPOSED EXTENSION, RELOCATION, OR MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL FACILITIES (sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc.) None 12) OWNERS OF RECORD OF ALL CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES & MAILING ADDRESSES (this maybe provided on a separate attached sheet) gee attached sheet 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE July., 2006 14) PLANS AND FEE Plat plans shall be submitted which shows the information listed on Exhibit A attached. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (I I" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A sketch subdivision application fee is $125. 2 I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. 4 ,/f, I:1 SIGNA URE"OF ERTY O ER / �CJ2�N�DvN T21/ rGU�.BAL C./Z�Q / T l� N .ai✓ Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: 1513 ( �U—C, I have reviewed this sketch plan application and find it to be: 01,C"00,mplete ❑ Incomplete Director of Pl nnin & Zoning or D i nee Date Adjacent Property Owners Jerry & Martha Couillard P.O. Box 310 Milton, VT 05468 Easy Self Storage Inc 61 South Willard Street Burlington, VT 05407 Carolyn Mitchell 14 Lindenwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Patricia Austen 16 Lindenwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Brian & Jeanne Shea 18 Lindenwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 Mark, Fred, & Eleanor Smith 22 Lindenwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 City of South Burlington CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 June 15, 2006 James J. Mullowney PO Box 467 Burlington, VT 05402 Re: Vermont Gas Systems Dear Mr. Mullowney: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, June 20, 2006 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, �C1 Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6+� C June q, 2006 Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. 85 Swift Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a draft agenda for the June 20, 2006 Development Review Board Meeting. It includes an application for development on your property. This is being sent to you and the abutting property owners to make aware that a public meeting is being held regarding the proposed development. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, i� tw BetsyMc ono Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. cc: James Mullowney CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT 05403 (802)846-4io6 June g, 2006 Pat & Therese Ayer PO Box 9451 South Burlington, VT 05407 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of the draft agenda (please check our website www.sburl.com for the official agenda, posted the Friday before the meeting) for the June 20, 20o6 Development Review Board meeting. It includes a proposal that abuts your property. Under Title 24, Section 4471 of State law, participation in a municipal regulatory proceeding is required in order to preserve your right to appeal a local development approval to the Vermont Environmental Court. State law specifies that "Participation in a local regulatory proceeding shall consist of offering, through oral or written testimony, a statement of concern related to the subject of the proceeding." If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4106, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the scheduled public meeting. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. COMBINED DATA PARCELS A & B #69 & ,y85 Area, Density and Dimensional Requirements: Proposed (w/ Allowable Proposed R.O.W. Adjustment) Minimum Lot Size: 40,000 s.f. 283,575 s.f. 277,891 s.f. Total Acreage: 4 Acres(PUD) 6.51 Acres 6.38 Acres Number of Lots: 2 2 Minimum Lot Frontage: 350 feet 685 feet 685 feet Maximum Building Coverage: 30.0% 0.73% 8.73% (UNCHANGED) Maximum Front Yard Coverage: 30.0% 39.5%(>7 31.5% Maximum Impervious Area: 70.0% 56.8% 56.0% Type of Land Use: Commercial Office Building p Includes sidewalk improvements requested by the City of South Burlington. LEGEND EXISTING CONTOUR / -ale- PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPERTY LINE O IRON PIN e CONC. MONUMENT —SS— GRAVITY SEWER LINE --- — W — WATER LINE -- — E — OVERHEAD ELECTRIC -- — G — GAS LINE ® SEWER MANHOLE ® STORM MANHOLE 9 HYDRANT 0 WATER SHUT-OFF VALVE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC POLE ® CATCH BASIN » LIGHT POLE SIGN Q (® EXISTING TREES FACE OF BRUSH/WOODS —0----0— EXISTING FENCE ------- --- --- WETLAND ui�■-■�■�oluu■® it ���a_■%�\\r■y\Yi/ii/Lis■�o■■■r siei'allas■■■��% -` I F� R ca-l" M/TCHELL Dorothy FLEM/NG 1, Northwest ltOd Ell Carrectron FacFocrYlty fj{ 8.48 FIREVOCA6LE Ofl$i OF DEDICATION ALONG SWIFT STRE�T TO THE OFTY OF 90. BORlN3TON BICE PATH ��BOEWALKTn MATCH ®GE OF 91EWA �/. I 1! \ kA ` \ � --PARCEL B #85 / Iy l� 1 1 11 ( - f -- 0@0ee _ _ I / ✓adM//u�A O!O° \ \ \ \ \II t 1 , . i'1 �I —_ _ „� j j/ to®m � I I '1 jj 1 � E+difN �ir9 \• I I I C, 1 � � 1 1 �1 ; !, tR l I `\ � _ - /��j /►innaee tx� s)etev»II, �� / � o _ ' �\�`��; �c - ---._ _ � sue• J. I f` �sm,;r• ran „\ 1 tw ' i5 . t � so. , IP -- � ��� �� C '�� ► ���` �� �IyU� 1 T O OFFER 'S I i l 1 I ! � / I � l '• -'�,,)� - _-J I me v�nPs l �_ -- I ` �� � 1 ( �awrthgton � WW � MAY \ ond `rof BG&YfA bo&tennne ' ga/ph and I \ ��• B 9YEA Gsuee , I I City of �nWo ARUZZA � South Burlington -- SAY .REPLACED BUFF`Eo.RMDW DES SWIFT STREET P.U.D. \ 1-31-p3 SAV IAOVm ROAD Y BEItlEA' PICB A 9 AND PARCEL B 5 SAV ADDED SIDEWALK, UTILITY PADS 57, 69 & 85 SWFT STREET GRAPHIC SCALE F 8-- SAV ADD WETLAND IMPACT, EXTEND SIDEWALK OVERALL SITE PLAN ~PQT' A 0� ecf 6-11-97 SAV REVISED PROPOSED FUTURE ROADWAY ° 15226 A Dote Ch'k'd Revision SOUTH BURLINGTON 4T,Y RM NT ( 1N FEET ) ff".'t 4o<w Drawn by MJW Date APRIL, 1997 SHEET 1 mph = 40 tt AA A Checked by R Scale 1" = 40' Cik CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. I CITY �OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 August 24, 2005 Kelly Lamphere LaPan Wright & Morrissey, Inc. PO Box 421 Burlington, VT 05402-0421 Re: Release Bond #LPM0009966 - 69 Swift Street Dear Ms. LaPan: Please be advised that the City of South Burlington hereby releases you from the obligation to maintain the above referenced bond. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Administrative Officer r.b► WRIGHT & MORRISSEY, INC. 99 Swift Street, Suite 100, So. Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 863-4541 GENERAL CONTRACTORS P.O. Box 421, Burlington, VT 05402 Fax 865-1253 February 2, 2005 City of South Burlington Planning and Zoning Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 69 Swift Street - Access Drive Bond To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed please find an executed Surety Bond for the future access drive at 69 Swift Street in South Burlington, Vermont. Our current bond is due to expire on February 4, 2005. Sincerely, Kelly Lamphere LaPan Property Manager kll Enclosure p Fidelity and Deposit Companies p Surety Service Center 3910 Keswick Road Baltimore, MD 21211 Toll Free Phone No: 1-800-664-0939 CONTINUATION CERTIFICATE For Miscellaneous Terms Bonds Principal: Wright & Morrissey, Inc. Bond No. LPM0009966 and the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, as Surety in a certain Bond No. LPM0009966 , with an effective date of the 4TH day of FEBRUARY , 2005 in the penalty of Seventy Five Thousand and Zero Cents Dollars ( S 75,000.00 ) In Favor of. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON do hereby continue said bond in force for the further term(s) of 1 years(s) beginning on the 4TH day of FEBRUARY , 2005 and ending on the 4TH day of FEBRUARY , 2006 EXCESS WEIGHT & OTHER HIGHWAY PROVIDED, however, that said bond, as continued hereby, shall be subject to all its terms and conditions, except as herein modified, and that the liability of the said Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland under said bond and any and all continuations thereof shall in no event exceed in the aggregate the above named penalty, and that this certificate shall not be valid unless signed by said Principal. Signed, sealed and dated this 22ND day of DECEMBER , 2004 . Witness: (SEAL) Daniel B. MorrPresidentPrinc' 1 (SEAL) Principal (SEAL) Principal FIDELITY AND DEPOSITY COMPANY OF MARYLAND 'gyp DEP0,f, O 11M i BY: THEODORE G. MARTINEZ , Attorney -in -fact LPM 90001 Ed.(07/03) Bond Number: LPM0009966 Power of Attorney FIDELITYAND DEPOSIT COMPANYOF MARYLAND HOME OFFICE: 3910 KESWICK ROAD, BALTIMORE, MD 21211 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a corporation of the State of Maryland, by Frank E. Martin, Jr.,Vice President and Gerald F. Haley, Assistant Secretary, in pursuance of authority granted by Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of said Com- pany, which are setforth on the nextpage hereof and are hereby certified to be in full force and effecton the date hereof, does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint THEODORE G. MARTINEZ , its true and lawful agent and Attorney -in -Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver, for, and on its behalf as surety, and as its actand deed: Bond or undertaking number LPM0009966 , issued on behalf of Wright & Morrissey, Inc. , as Principal in a penalty not to exceed the sum of Ninety Thousand and Zero Cents $ 90.000.00 ) and the execution of such bond or undertaking in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding upon said company, as fully and amply, to a I intents and purposes, as if it had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company at its office in Baltimore, MD., in their own proper persons. The said Assistant Secretary does hereby certify thatthe extract setforth on the next page hereof is a true copy of Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of said Company, and is now in force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Vice -President and Assistant Secretary have hereunto subscribed their names and affixed the Corporate Seal of the said FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND this 22ND day of DECEMBER A.D. 2004 ATTEST: n-ii Gerald F. Haley State of Maryland SS: County of Baltimore FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND Assistant Secretary Frank E. Martin, Jr., Vice President On this 22ND day of DECEMBER , A.D. 2004 , before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, duly commissioned and qualified, came Frank E. Martin, Jr., Vice President, and Gerald F. Haley, Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, to me personally known to be the individuals and officers described in and who executed the preceding instrument, and they each acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me duly sworn, severally and each for himself deposeth and saith, that they are the said officers of the Company aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Sealof said Company, and thatthe said Corporate Seal and theirsignatures as such officers were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporation. IN TESTIMONEY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal the day and year first above written. i A ` �I��j,M�f'A• Stephen G. Moxley, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 11/01/2007 GENOOOII Ed.(07/03) 3436 EXTRACT FROM BY-LAWS OF FIDELITYAND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND "Article VI, Section 2. The Chairman of the Board, or the President, or any Executive Vice -President, or any of the Senior Vice -Presidents or Vice -Presidents specially authorized so to do by the Board of Directors or by the Executive Committee, shall have power, by and with the concurrence of the Secretary or any one of the Assistant Secretaries, to appoint Resident Vice -Presidents, Assistant Vice -Presidents and Attorneys -in -Fact as the business of the Company may require, or to authorize any person or persons to execute on behalf of the Company any bonds, undertaking, recognizances, stipulations, policies, contracts, agreements, deeds, and releases and assignments of judgements, decrees, mortgages and instruments in the nature of mortgages,... and to affix the seal of the Company thereto." CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, do hereby certify that the original Power of Attorney of which the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy, is in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certify that the Vice -President who executed the said Power of Attorney was one of the additional Vice -Presidents specially authorized by the Board of Directors to appoint any Attorney -in -Fact as provided in Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND. This Powerof Attorney and Certificate may be signed byfacsimile underand by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors ofthe FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at a meeting duly called and held on the 5th day of May, 1994. RESOLVED: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced seal of the company and facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any Vice -Presi- dent, Secretary, or Assistant Secretary of the Company, whether made heretofore or hereafter, wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company, shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed." IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the said Company, this 22ND dayof DECEMBER 2004 L.L. Goucher Assistant Secretary 0 3437 } f� 1 WRIGHT & MORRISSEY, INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS September 14, 2004 99 Swift Street, Suite 100, So. Burlington, VT 05403 P.O. Box 421, Burlington, VT 05402 City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Attention: Mr. Ray Belair Re: 69 Swift Street — Access Drive Bond To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed please find an executed Surety Bond for the future access drive at 69 Swift Street in South Burlington, Vermont. Please call me with any questions you might have. Sincerely, {� V '0 Kelly L. LaPan Duly Authorized kll Enclosure (802) 863-4541 Fax 865-1253 W Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland Home Office: P.O. Box 1227, Baltimore, MD 21203-1227 Bond No. LPM 0009966 CONTINUATION CERTIFICATE For Miscellaneous Term Bonds Wright & Morrisey Inc., as Principal, and the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, as Surety in a certain Bond No. LPM 0009966, with an effective date of the 4th day of February, 2003, in the penalty of Seventy Five Thousand and no cents Dollars ($ 75,000.00), in favor of City of South Burlington, VT do hereby continue said bond in force for the further term of one year beginning on the 4th day of February, 2004. License and Permit Bond�ttt�.�. PROVIDED, however, that said bond, as continued hereby, shall be subject to all its terms and conditions, except as herein modified, and that the liability of the said Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland under said bond and any and all continuations thereof shall in no event exceed in the aggregate the above named penalty, and that this certificate shall not be valid unless signed by said Principal. Signed, sealed and dated this 27th day of August, 2004. Witness: Wright & Morriss�yy.Inc. By. I� (SEAL) Daniel B. MorrisseyPrincipal President (SEAL) Princ ipa 1 (SEAL) Principal FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND Scott F . Boardman , Attorney -in -Fact J333 Power of Attorney FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a corporation of the State of Maryland, by PAUL C. ROGERS, Vice President, and T. E. SMITH, Assistant Secretary, in pursuance of authority granted by Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of said Company, w ' set forth on the reverse side hereof and are hereby certified to be in full force and effect on the date hereof d s nate, constitute and appoint Scott F. BOARDMAN, Paul E. PLUNKETT, D. Michael BO n MAN, III, Richard S. SMITH and Brenda SCHILL, all of Burlington, Vermo i nd a p ttorney-in-Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver, for, and on its beha its and all bonds and undertakings and the execution of such-IIQ o ngs i t a presents, shall be as binding upon said Company, as fully and ampl een duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected of n i 1 ore, Md., in their own proper persons. This power of attorney revokes that issued=�O'f , Paul E. PLUNKETT, D. Michael BOARDMAN, I. Munn BOARDMAN, III, =wy 3 M renda SCHILL, dated November 27,2001. The said Assistant does hereby certify that the extract set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of said Company, and is now in force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Vice -President and Assistant Secretary have hereunto subscribed their names and affixed the Corporate Seal of the said FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, this 17th day of March, A.D. 2003. ATTEST: FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND �p OEPps` Y T. E. Smith Assistant Secretary State of Maryland I ss: City of Baltimore Paul C. Rogers Vice President On this 17th day of March, A.D. 2003, before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, duly commissioned and qualified, came PAUL C. ROGERS, Vice President, and T. E. SMITH, Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, to me personally known to be the individuals and officers described in and who executed the preceding instrument, and they each acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me duly sworn, severally and each for himself deposeth and saith, that they are the said officers of the Company aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Company, and that the said Corporate Seal and their signatures as such officers were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporation. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal the day and year first above written. �rw+� NotnRr '^ AwxT Sandra Lynn Mooney Notary Public My Commission Expires: January 1, 2004 POA-F 063-8076A EXTRACT FROM BY-LAWS OF FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND "Article VI, Section 2. The Chairman of the Board, or the President, or any Executive Vice -President, or any of the Senior Vice -Presidents or Vice -Presidents specially authorized so to do by the Board of Directors or by the Executive Committee, shall have power, by and with the concurrence of the Secretary or any one of the Assistant Secretaries, to appoint Resident Vice -Presidents, Assistant Vice -Presidents and Attorneys -in -Fact as the business of the Company may require, or to authorize any person or persons to execute on behalf of the Company any bonds, undertaking, recognizances, stipulations, policies, contracts, agreements, deeds, and releases and assignments of judgements, decrees, mortgages and instruments in the nature of mortgages,... and to affix the seal of the Company thereto." CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, du hereby certify that the foregoing Power of Attorney is still in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certify that the Vice -President who executed the said Power of Attorney was one of the additional Vice -Presidents specially authorized by the Board of Directors to appoint any Attorney -in -Fact as provided in Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND. This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at a meeting duly called and held on the 1 Oth day of May, 1990. RESOLVED: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced seal of the company and facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any Vice -President, Secretary, or Assistant Secretary of the Company, whether made heretofore or hereafter, wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company, shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed." IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the said Company, this 27th day of August , 2004 Assistant Secretary Fidelity'and Deposit C6mpany HONE OFFICE OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE, MD. 21203 License and/or Permit Bond KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we ...... WRIGHT & MORRISSEY, INC., PO BOX 421, BURLINGTON, VT 05402 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - as Principal, and FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT CONIPANY OF MARYLAND, incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland, _ with principal office P.O. Box 1227, Baltimore, Maryland 21203, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF__SOUTH_ BURLINGTON,___575 DORSET__STREET, SO__BURLINGTON, VT 05403_____. as Obligee, in penal sum of.._SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS__AND _00(100_________ Dollars, lawful money of the United States, for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, ex- ecutors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly, by these presents. WHEREAS, the above bounden Principal has obtained or is about to obtain from the said Oblioce a license or permit for ----__FUTURE ACCESS DRIVE, 69 SWIFT STREET PROJECT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- and the term of said license or permit is as indicated opposite the block checked below: 0 Beginning the .......... 4TH---------------------------- day of ............ FEBRUARY-------------- W00%nd ending the------------- 4TH day of FEBRUARY (�2001 -- - - -- - ------------------------- O Continuous, beginning the -------------------------------------- day of -------------------------------------- 19....... WHEREAS , the Principal is required by law to file with___ -CITY_ OF SOUTH BURLINGTON - -------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ a bond for the above indicated term and conditioned as hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That if the above bounden Prin- cipal as such licensee or permittee shall indemnify said Obligee against all loss, costs, expenses or damage to it caused by said Principal's non-compliance with or breach of any laws, statutes, ordinances, rules or regulations pertaining to such license or permit issued to the Principal, which said breach or non-compliance shall occur during the term of this bond, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. PROVIDED, that if this bond is for a fixed term, it may be continued by Certificate executed by the Surety hereon; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that regardless of the number of years this bond shall continue or be continued in force and of the number of premiums that shall be payable or paid the Surety shall not be liable hereunder for a larger amount, in the aggregate, than the amount of this bond, and PROVIDED FURTHER, that if this is a continuous bond and the Surety shall so elect, this bond may be cancelled by the Surety as to subsequent liability by giving thirty (30) days notice in writing to said Obligee. 6TH MARCH 2O Signed, scaled and dated the 1- - -------------------------------day of------------------------------------------------------46 000 ISSEl, Principal By_----------- ----- FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY F MARYLAND SCOT F. BOARDMAN Attorney -in -Fact J5191-5M.692 236160 No. License and/or Permit Bond Effective _ _ 19___ On T Fidelity and Deposit Company OF MARYLAND Power of Attorney FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND HOME OFFICE: P.O. BOX 1227, BALTIMORE, MD 21203-1227 Know ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a corporation of the State of Maryland, by W. B. WALBRECHER, Vice -President, and T. E. SMITH, Assistant Secretary, in pursuance of authority granted by Article VI, Section 2, of ty-Laws of 'd Company, which are set forth on the reverse side hereof and are hereby certified to be in full fo d effect a date hereof, does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint Scott F. BOARDMAN, Paul PLU , D. Mi OARDMAN, I. Munn BOARDMAN, III and Richard S. SMITH, all of Burlington, Vermon H its ° awful agent and Attorney -in -Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver, for, and on its behalf as sur as its deed: any and all bonds and undertakings and the execution of such bonds or undertakings in p ce of th sents, shall be as binding upon said Company, as fully and amply, to all intents and purposes, as if ° d been e ecuted and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company at its office in Baltimo d , in thei proper persons. This power of attorney revokes those issued on behalf of Scott F. Boardman, et al, eptemb 994, on behalf of I. Munn Boardman, III dated January 16, 1997 and on behalf of Richard S. Smith�� une 7, 1" The said Assistant Secretary does he ° y�ertify th extract set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws Comp a is now in force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the sai lce-Pres' a and Assistant Secretary have hereunto subscribed their names and affixed the Corporate Seal of the said FIDE AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, this 17th day of November, A.D. 1999. ATTEST: a FIDELITY A POSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND -1- - 7 ac By: T. E Smith Assistant Secretary W. B. Walbrecher Vice -President State of Maryland } SS: County of Baltimore ) On this 17th day of November, A.D. 1999, before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, duly commissioned and qualified, came W. B. Walbrecher, Vice -President and T. E. Smith, Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, to me personally known to be the individuals and officers described in and who executed the preceding instrument, and they each acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me duly sworn, severally and each for himself deposeth and saith, that they are the said officers of the Company aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Company, and that the said Corporate Seal and their signatures as such officers were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authori;, and direction of the said Corporation. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal the day and year first above written. y0`1 p'`9 PUZZ Carol J. Fa r Notary Public My Commissi Expires: August 1, 2000 L1428-063-8076A EXTRACT FROM BY-LAWS OF FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND "Article VI, Section 2. The Chairman of the Board, or the President, or any Executive Vice -President, or any of the Senior Vice -Presidents or Vice -Presidents specially authorized so to do by the Board of Directors or by the Executive Committee, shall have power, by and with the concurrence of the Secretary or any one of the Assistant Secretaries, to appoint Resident Vice -Presidents, Assistant Vice -Presidents and Attorneys -in -Fact as the business of the Company may require, or to authorize any person or persons to execute on behalf of the Company any bonds, undertaking, recognizances, stipulations, policies, contracts, agreements, deeds, and releases and assignments of judgements, decrees, mortgages and instruments in the nature of mortgages,...and to affix the seal of the Company thereto." CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, do hereby certify that the original Power of Attorney of which the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy, is in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certify that the Vice -President who executed the said Power of Attorney was one of the additional Vice -Presidents specially authorized by the Board of Directors to appoint any Attorney -in -Fact as provided in Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND. This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at a meeting duly called and held on the I Oth day of May, 1990. RESOLVED: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced seal of the company and facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any Vice -President, Secretary, or Assistant Secretary of the Company, whether made heretofore or hereafter, wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company, shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed." IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the said Company, this 16th day of March 2000 Assistant Secretary HICKOK b f3O `DMAN FINANCIAL SEKVICES Real Estate ♦ Insurance ♦ Financial Planning Insurance Division 346 Shelburne Road, P.O. Box 1064 Burlington, Vermont 05402-1064 Tel: (802) 658-3500 Fax: (802) 658-0541 In state: (800) 639-1655 March 21, 2000 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So Burlington, VT 05403 RE: WRIGHT & MORRISSEY, INC. To whom it may concern: f, Please find enclosed renewal Permit Bond for the above referenced Principal. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me at ext. 2216. Sincerely, Carrie Ashley Commercial Account Assistant enc Insuring Vermonters and their Businesses since 1821 Fidelity'and Deposit Company HOME OFFICE OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE, MD. 21203 License and/or Permit Bond KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we,_Wright & Morrissey,__Inc. PO Box 421, Burlington,_ VT 05402 as Principal, and FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland, with principal office P.O. Box 1227, Baltimore, Maryland 21203, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto _City --- of--- quth_Bu_rlingtons575_Dorset St. So. Burlington..__VT__05403------------ as Obligee, in penal su'm of__Se_v__enty_-five__thousand dollars and _00/100----------------------------- Dollars lawful money of the United States, for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, ex- ecutors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly, by these presents. WHEREAS, the above bounden Principal has obtained or is about to obtain from the said Obligee a license or permit for --- Future _ Access --- Driv_e,__69Swift_ Street --- Project_, ________________________________________ ; and the term of said license or permit is as indicated opposite the block checked below: EX Beginning the--- 4th - ---------------day of ---- February- ----------------------- 1999--, and ending the ---------- 4th----------------day of__February -----------------------)IN2Q9.0 ❑ Continuous, beginning the day of 19_-__-- WHEREAS , the Principal is required by law to file withThe__City--- of__South_ Burlington _ a bond for the above indicated term and conditioned as hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That if the above bounden Prin- cipal as such licensee or permittee shall indemnify said Obligee against all loss, costs, expenses or damage to it caused by said Principal's non-compliance with or breach of any laws, statutes, ordinances, rules or regulations pertaining to such license or permit issued to the Principal, which said breach or non-compliance shall occur during the term of this bond, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. PROVIDED, that if this bond is for a fixed term, it may be continued by Certificate executed by the Surety hereon; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that regardless of the number of years this bond shall continue or be continued in force and of the number of premiums that shall be payable or paid the Surety shall not be liable hereunder for a larger amount, in the aggregate, than the amount of this bond, and PROVIDED FURTHER, that if this is a continuous bond and the Surety shall so elect, this bond may be cancelled by the Surety as to subsequent liability by giving thirty (30) days notice in writing to said Obligee. Signed, sealed and dated the .......... 15th- -- -- -------------------day of_ -------- April- -----------------19-99 Inc_,______ ---------------- Principal By--- --- ---- ----- - -------------------- FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY O MARY I'l By J519a-5M, 6-92 236160 Scott F . Boardman Attorney -in -Fact No. License and/or Permit Bond Effective--------------------------------------------------- 19 On------------ ----- To----------------- Fidelity and Deposit Company OF MARYLAND Power of Attorney FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND HOME OFFICE, BALTIMORE, MD KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a corporation of the State of Maryland, by C. M. PECOT, JR., Vice -President, and C. W. ROBBINS, Assistant Secretary, in pursuance of authority granted by Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of said Company, which are set forth on the reverse side hereof and are hereby certified to be in full force and effect on the date hereof, does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint Scott F. Boardman, Erlend G. Gokey, Paul Plunkett, D. Michael Boardman and Steven K. J. Gentile, all of Burlington, r s rue an aw agent anG AttOrney-m-1,act, to malce, execute, seal and 2eliver, for, and on its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed. any and all bonds and undertakings ................................... And- the execution of such bonds or undertakings in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding upon said Company, as fully and amply, to all intents and purposes, as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company at its office in Baltimore, Md., in their own proper persons. This power of attorney revokes that issued on behalf of Scott-F. Boardman, etal, dated July 8, 1994. The said Assistant Secretary does hereby certify that the extract set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of Article VI, Section 2 of the By -Laws of said Company, and is now in force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Vice -President and Assistant Secretary have hereunto subscribed their names and affixed the Corporate Seal of the said FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, this --------- 9th-------------------------- day of ___________ Sepptember_______- A.D. 19_-94 �' FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND ATTEST: ��I- --- P,_V�By— UNTAssistant Secretary Vice -Pr silent STATE OF MARYLAND COY OF BALTIMORE 1 SS: On this --- 9th----- day of ------ A.D. 1994_, before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, duly commissioned and qualified, came C. M. PECOT, JR., Vice -President and C. W. ROBBINS, Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, to me personally known to be the individuals and officers described in and who executed the preceding instrument, and they each acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me duly sworn, severally and each for himself deposeth and saith, that they are the said officers of the Company aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Company, and that the said Corporate Seal and their signatures as such officers were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporation. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal the day and year first above written. -------------------- t`twc CAROL J. FADER // v Notary Public My Commission Expires__________________1996_____________ CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, do hereby certify that the original Power of Attorney of which the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy, is in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certify that the Vice -President who executed the said Power of Attorney was one of the additional Vice -Presidents specially authorized by the Board of Directors to appoint any Attorney -in -Fact as provided in Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND. This Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at a meeting duly called and held on the 16th day of July, 1969. RESOLVED: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any Assistant Secretary of the Company, whether made heretofore or hereafter, wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company, shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed." IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the said Company, this 15 th day of_ ------ AP r i 1--------------------------, 19. 9 9. --------------------------- --------- -- ------ --- - - - ------------------ Assistant Secretary Lla2sc—063-8076 EXTRACT FROM BY-LAWS OF FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND "Article VI, Section 2. The Chairman of the Board, or the President, or any Executive Vice -President, or any of the Senior Vice - Presidents or Vice -Presidents specially authorized so to do by the Board of Directors or by the Executive Committee, shall have power, by and with the concurrence of the Secretary or any one of the Assistant Secretaries, to appoint Resident Vice -Presidents, Assistant Vice -Presidents and Attorneys -in -Fact as the business of the Company may require, or to authorize any person or persons to execute on behalf of the Company any bonds, undertakings, recognizances, stipulations, policies, contracts, agreements, deeds, and releases and assignments of judgements, decrees, mortgages and instruments in the nature of mortgages, ... and to affix the seal of the Company thereto." ■ Fidelityd Deposit Company an HOME OFFICE OF M A R Y LA N D BALTIMORE, MD. 21203 License and/or Permit Bond KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: Daniel Morrissey c/o That we -------- Wright__& Morrissey Inc.,_ 60_Farrell Street, South Burlington, VT 05403 as Principal, and FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland, with principal office P.O. Box 1227, Baltimore, Maryland 21203, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto _____ City___of South _Burlington, _575 Dorset Street,_ So Burlington, VT ------------------------ as Obligee, in penal sum of_ .... Seventy__Five--- Thousand Dollars and no/100******************* Dollars, lawful money of the United States, for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, ex- ecutors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly, by these presents. WHEREAS, the above bounden Principal has obtained or is about to obtain from the said Obligee a license or permit for ------------- Future_ -Access Drive at 69 Swift Street Project ------------ - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------; and the term of said license or permit is as indicated opposite the block checked below: C Beginning the ------- 15 th ending the ------------ 15th ❑ Continuous, beginning the day of_ ... Sep t emb e r---------------------19 9-7— and -day of--- _September -----------19-_98 WHEREAS , the Principal is required by law to file The Citv of South Burlington day of a bond for the above indicated term and conditioned as hereinafter set forth. 19------ NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That if the above bounden Prin- cipal as such licensee or permittee shall indemnify said Obligee against all loss, costs, expenses or damage to it caused by said Principal's non-compliance with or breach of any laws, statutes, ordinances, rules or regulations pertaining to such license or permit issued to the Principal, which said breach or non-compliance shall occur during the term of this bond, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. PROVIDED, that if this bond is for a fixed term, it may be continued by Certificate executed by the Surety hereon-, and PROVIDED FURTHER, that regardless of the number of years this bond shall continue or be continued in force and of the number of premiums that shall be payable or paid the Surety shall not be liable hereunder for a largtr ar:ount, in the aggregate, than the amount of this bond, and PROVIDED FURTHER, that if this is a continuous bond and the Surety shall so elect, this bond may, be ;:ancelled' by the Surety as to subsequent liability by giving thirty (30) days notice in writing to said Obligee. , i , (" 15th---------------------------- day of 9 7 Signed, sealed and dated the----------- --- -----------------------------_------19------ FIDELITY AND J519a-5M, 6-92 236160 Scott F. Boardman Attorney -in -Fact No. License and/or Permit Bond Effective __ __ _____ 19 On To Fidelity and Deposit Company OF MARYLAND Power of Attorney FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND HOME OFFICE, BALTIMORE, MD KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a corporation of the State of Maryland, by C. M. PECOT, JR., Vice -President, and C. W. ROBBINS, Assistant Secretary, in pursuance of authority granted by Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of said Company, which are set forth on the reverse side hereof and are hereby certified to be in full force and effect on the date hereof, does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint Scott F. Boardman, Erlend G. Gokey, Paul Plunkett, D. Michael Boardman and Steven K. J. Gentile, all of Burlington, ar"u u .�uvu�cy-ui-rau, tv i!Ld&C, C MUM, scai anu ueuver, ror, ana on its oenalt as surety, and as its act and deed: any and all bonds and undertakings ............................................. And the execution of such bonds or undertakings in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding upon said Company, as fully and amply, to all intents and purposes, as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company at its office in Baltimore, Md., in their own proper persons. This power of attorney revokes that issued on behalf of Scott F. Boardman, etal, dated July 8, 1994. The said Assistant Secretary does hereby certify that the extract set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of said Company, and is now in force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Vice -President and Assistant Secretary have hereunto subscribed their names and affixed the Corporate Seal of the said FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, this --------------- 9th__----------------- clay of ------------ Sept9_4Lber-------- A.D. 19__94 .�, FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND 9 ATTE SEAL �.,...� BY Assistant Secretary Vic President STATE OF MARYLAND COUNTY OF BALTIMORE ( SS: On this --- 9th ----- day of______Septetnber___ A.D. 1994_, before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, duly commissioned and qualified, came C. M. PECOT, JR., Vice -President and C. W. ROBBINS, Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, to me personally known to be the individuals and officers described in and who executed the preceding instrument, and they each acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me duly sworn, severally and each for himself deposeth and saith, that they are the said officers of the Company aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Company, and that the said Corporate Seal and their signatures as such officers were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporation. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal the day and year first above written. ________ ________ J. D 9 CAROL FA ER / Notary Public My Commission Expires ------------------- August 1,_ 1996-_-__--_-____- CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, do hereby certify that the original Power of Attorney of which the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy, is in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certify that the Vice -President who executed the said Power of Attorney was one of the additional Vice -Presidents specially authorized by the Board of Directors to appoint any Attorney -in -Fact as provided in Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND. This Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at a meeting duly called and held on the 16th day of July, 1969. RESOLVED: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any Assistant Secretary of the Company, whether made heretofore or hereafter, wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company, shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed. " IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the said Company, this __ 15 th_ day of_ ---- ,3ep-teinhea--------------------- 19__91. ------------------------- ------------`..- ------------------- Assistant Secretary L1428C—063-80176 EXTRACT FROM BY-LAWS OF FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND "Article VI, Section 2. The Chairman of the Board, or the President, or any Executive Vice -President, or any of the Senior Vice - Presidents or Vice -Presidents specially authorized so to do by the Board of Directors or by the Executive Committee, shall have power, by and with the concurrence of the Secretary or any one of the Assistant Secretaries, to appoint Resident Vice -Presidents, Assistant Vice -Presidents and Attorneys -in -Fact as the business of the Company may require, or to authorize any person or persons to execute on behalf of the Company any bonds, undertakings, recognizances, stipulations, policies, contracts, agreements, deeds, and releases and assignments of judgements, decrees, mortgages and instruments in the nature of mortgages, ... and to affix the seal of the Company thereto." 'J Fidelity and Deposit Company HOME OFFICE OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE, MD. 21203 License and/or Permit Bond KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: Daniel Morrissey c/o That we,___W_x_�ght__ &_ Morrsaey__ Inc. --- 60_Farrell_Street_.__SouthBurl ington,_ VT__05403_ , as Principal, and FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland, with principal office P.O. Box 1227, Baltimore, Maryland 21203, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto ------------------ Clt�__s�f___Sot�th__Buringtoni575DorsetStreet,�o_BurlingtonZ--- VT_ as Obligee, in penal sum of_ ......... Fifteen Thousand - Dollars and no/100******************** Dollars, -- - - - - - - ---------- - lawful money of the United States, for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, ex- ecutors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly, by these presents. WHEREAS, the above bounden Principal has obtained or is about to obtain from the said Obligee a license or permit for______ Sidewalk/Recreation.-Area Path at 69 Swift Street. and the term of said license or permit is as indicated opposite the block checked below: Beginning the g g 15 th - --------------day of- ........ Sep t emb e r----------------19 9 7_, and --------------- ending the --------15th---------------------------------- day of-------- September -....... 1998_. ❑ Continuous, beginning the------------- _____-------day of -------------------------------------- 19-----_. WHEREAS , the Principal is required by law to file The City of South Burlington a bond for the above indicated term and conditioned as hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That if the above bounden Prin- cipal as such licensee or permittee shall indemnify said Obligee against all loss, costs, expenses or damage to it caused by said Principal's non-compliance with or breach of any laws, statutes, ordinances, rules or regulations pertaining to such license or permit issued to the Principal, which said breach or non-compliance shall occur during the term of this bond, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. PROVIDED, that if this bond is for a fixed term, it may be continued by Certificate executed by the Surety hereon; and i PROVIDED FURTHER, that regardless of the number of years this bond shall continue or be continued' in force and of the number of premiums that shall be payable or paid the Surety shall not be liable hereunder for a larger .amount, in the aggregate, than the amount of this bond, and PROVIDED FURTHER, that if this is a continuous bond and the Surety shall so elect, this bond may be cantc-Oled by the Surety as to subsequent liability by giving thirty (30) days notice in writing to said Obligee. Signed, sealed and dated the -------------- ______15th _________________day of_ ......... September By FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT 191_97 By --- — V `-- r -' Scott F. Boardman J519a-W, 6-92 236160 Attorney -in -Fact No. License and/or Permit Bond Effective---------------------------------------------------- 19 On Fidelity and Deposit Company OF MARYLAND W, Power of Attorney FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND HOME OFFICE, BALTIMORE, MD KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a corporation of the State of Maryland, by C. M. PECOT, JR., Vice -President, and C. W. ROBBINS, Assistant Secretary, in pursuance of authority granted by Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of said Company, which are set forth on the reverse side hereof and are hereby certified to be in full force and effect on the date hereof, does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint Scott F. Boardman, Erlend G. Gokey, Paul Plunkett, D. Michael Boardman and Steven K. J. Gentile, all of Burlington, Aont, EACR----------- us�tru- a wMaw agent an ttorney-m- act, to TZZe, execute, seal and geliver, for, and on its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed any and all bonds and undertakings ......................................... And the execution of such bonds or undertakings in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding upon said Company, as fully and amply, to all intents and purposes, as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company at its office in Baltimore, Md., in their own proper persons. This power of attorney revokes that issued on behalf of Scott F. Boardman, etal, dated July 8, 1994. The said Assistant Secretary does hereby certify that the extract set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of said Company, and is now in force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Vice -President and Assistant Secretary have hereunto subscribed their names and affixed the Corporate Seal of the said FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, this ------- _______9th---------------------------- day of --------- __SeptembP—r-------- A.D. 19__94 FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND ATTE SEAL Y Assistant Secretary Vic President STATE OF MARYLAND COUNTY OF BALTIMORE SS: On this --- 9th ----- day of______September A.D. 1994_, before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, duly commissioned and qualified, came C. M. PECOT, JR., Vice -President and C. W. ROBBINS, Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, to me personally known to be the individuals and officers described in and who executed the preceding instrument, and they each acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me duly sworn, severally and each for himself deposeth and saith, that they are the said officers of the Company aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Company, and that the said Corporate Seal and their signatures as such officers were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporation. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal the day and year first above written. �av ----- J. FA -- ----------- -------- �uc CAROL ED R / Notary Public My Commission Expires ------------------- August_1 _1996----__-_------ CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, do hereby certify that the original Power of Attorney of which the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy, is in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certify that the Vice -President who executed the said Power of Attorney was one of the additional Vice -Presidents specially authorized by the Board of Directors to appoint any Attorney -in -Fact as provided in Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND. This Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at a meeting duly called and held on the 16th day of July, 1969. RESOLVED: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any Assistant Secretary of the Company, whether made heretofore or hereafter, wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company, shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed." IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the said Company, this _i_5__t}._ day of_ ---- .ep_Lemktpx--------------------- 19 --- 3-7 ---------------------------------- -- -Sec---------- Assistant Secretary L1428,:-063-8076 EXTRACT FROM BY-LAWS OF FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND "Article VI, Section 2. The Chairman of the Board, or the President, or any Executive Vice -President, or any of the Senior Vice - Presidents or Vice -Presidents specially authorized so to do by the Board of Directors or by the Executive Committee, shall have power, by and with the concurrence of the Secretary or any one of the Assistant Secretaries, to appoint Resident Vice -Presidents, Assistant Vice -Presidents and Attorneys -in -Fact as the business of the Company may require, or to authorize any person or persons to execute on behalf of the Company any bonds, undertakings, recognizances, stipulations, policies, contracts, agreements, deeds, and releases and assignments of judgements, decrees, mortgages and instruments in the nature of mortgages, ... and to affix the seal of the Company thereto." Fidelityand Deposit Company HOME OFFICE OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE, MD. 21203 License and/or Permit Bond KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That we ........ Daniel _Morrissey c/o_Wright &Morrissey__Inc.__________ as Principal, and FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland, with principal office P.O. Box 1227, Baltimore, Maryland 21203, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto City__ of --- South_Burlington, 545 Dorset Street, So Burlington,- VT - ----------------------- ------------- -, as Obligee, in penal sum of_ ----- Twenty___Eight_Thousand Five Hundred Dollars__ and__ No/ 100*******_Dollars, - ------------------ lawful money of the United States, for which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, ex- ecutors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly, by these presents. WHEREAS, the above bounden Principal has obtained or is about to obtain from the said Obligee a license or permit for --------- andscaping_ Projectat69 Swift Street ; and the term of said license or permit is as indicated opposite the block checked below: KXBeginning the ------- 15th --------------- day of________ September ____1997_, and ending the ------------- 15th - - -------------day of -------- September ......... 4�_2000. ❑ Continuous, beginning the -------------------------------------- day of-----------------------------------19 WHEREAS , the Principal is required by law to file with ----- City of- South--Burlington,-Vermont a bond for the above indicated term and conditioned as hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That if the above bounden Prin- cipal as such licensee or permittee shall indemnify said Obligee against all loss, costs, expenses or damage to it caused by said Principal's non-compliance with or breach of any laws, statutes, ordinances, rules or regulations pertaining to such license or permit issued to the Principal, which said breach or non-compliance shall occur during the term of this bond, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. PROVIDED, that if this bond is for a fixed term, it may be continued by Certificate executed by the Surety hereon; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that regardless of the number of years this bond shall continue or be continued in torce and of the number of premiums that shall be payable or paid the Surety shall not be liable hereunder for a larger amo�:nt, in the aggregate, than the amount of this bond, and PROVIDED FURTHER, that if this is a continuous bond and the Surety shall so elect, this bond m;iy be cancelled by the Surety as to subsequent liability by giving thirty (30) days notice in writing to said Obligee. Signed, sealed and dated the-------------------- 15th------------------------- day of___ -_September ------- Y 1p 97 Principal - By - ------ - -----------Qet- - --- — ------------- --- FIDELITY AND DEPi----- IT CO BY- ---L------ -------------------- Scott F. Boardman Attorney -in -Fact J519a--5M, 6-92 236160 No. License and/or Permit Bond Effective---------------------------------------------------- 19 On To Fidelity and Deposit Company OF MARYLAND Power of Attorney FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND HOME OFFICE, BALTIMORE, MD KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a corporation of the State of Maryland, by C. M. PECOT, JR., Vice -President, and C. W. ROBBINS, Assistant Secretary, in pursuance of authority granted by Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of said Company, which are set forth on the reverse side hereof and are hereby certified to be in full force and effect on the date hereof, does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint Scott F. Boardman, Erlend G. Gokey, Paul Plunkett, D. Michael Boardman and Steven K. J. Gentile, all of Burlington, � . EACagH ---- > s rue an aw ent and Attorney-m-Fact, tom e, execute, seal and deliver, for, and on its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed: any and all bonds and undertakings ........................................ _ And the execution of such bonds or undertakings in pursuance of these presents, shall be as binding upon said Company, as fully and amply, to all intents and purposes, as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company at its office in Baltimore, Md., in their own proper persons. This power of attorney revokes that issued on behalf of Scott F. Boardman, etal, dated July 8, 1994. The said Assistant Secretary does hereby certify that the extract set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of said Company, and is now in force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Vice -President and Assistant Secretary have hereunto subscribed their names and affixed the Corporate Seal of the said FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, this --------- 9th-------------------------- day of ------------ -------- A.D. 19__94 �, FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND / ATTE SEAL •.....� B Y Assistant Secretary Vic President STATE OF MARYLAND COUNTY OF BALTEWORE l SS: On this --- 9th----- day of______September A.D. 1994_, before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, duly commissioned and qualified, came C. M. PECOT, JR., Vice -President and C. W. ROBBINS, Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, to me personally known to be the individuals and officers described in and who executed the preceding instrument, and they each acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me duly sworn, severally and each for himself deposeth and saith, that they are the said officers of the Company aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Company, and that the said Corporate Seal and their signatures as such officers were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said Corporation. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal the day and year first above written. �ouar -- - -- - --------- -------- -- - - -- - n�c CAROL J. FA ED R / Nora -- Public My Commission Expires ------------------- August_l_1996 CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, do hereby certify that the original Power of Attorney of which the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy, is in full force and effect on the date of this certificate; and I do further certify that the Vice -President who executed the said Power of Attorney was one of the additional Vice -Presidents specially authorized by the Board of Directors to appoint any Attorney -in -Fact as provided in Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND. This Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at a meeting duly called and held on the 16th day of July, 1969. RESOLVED: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any Assistant Secretary of the Company, whether made heretofore or hereafter, wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company, shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed." IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the said Company, this __151- _ day of------5 P_p t emb c r............ ...... 19__9 7. ---------------------------------- -------------------- Assistant Secretary LI42&-063-8076 t EXTRACT FROM BY-LAWS OF FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND "Article VI, Section 2. The Chairman of the Board, or the President, or any Executive Vice -President, or any of the Senior Vice - Presidents or Vice -Presidents specially authorized so to do by the Board of Directors or by the Executive Committee, shall have power, by and with the concurrence of the Secretary or any one of the Assistant Secretaries, to appoint Resident Vice -Presidents, Assistant Vice -Presidents and Attorneys -in -Fact as the business of the Company may require, or to authorize any person or persons to execute on behalf of the Company any bonds, undertakings, recognizances, stipulations, policies, contracts, agreements, deeds, and releases and assignments of judgements, decrees, mortgages and instruments in the nature of mortgages, ... and to affix the seal of the Company thereto." C }t WRIGHT & MORRISSEY, INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS April 13, 2001 60 Farrell Street., Suite 401, So. Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 863-4541 P.O. Box 421, Burlington, VT 05402 Fax 865-1253 City of South Burlington Planning & Zoning Department 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 69 Swift Street — Access Drive Bond To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed please find an executed Surety Bond for the future access drive at 69 Swift Street in South Burlington, Vermont. Please call me with any questions you might have. Sincerely, Kelly L. LaPan Owner's Representative kll Enclosure 1� p Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland Surety Service Center, 11411 Red Run Blvd., Suite 300 Owings Mills, MD 21117-3248 Toll Free Telephone Number: 1-800-664-0939 Bond No. LPM 8320008 CONTINUATION CERTIFICATE For Miscellaneous Term Bonds WRIGHT & MORRISSEY, INC, as Principal, and the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, as Surety in a certain Bond No. LPM 8320008, with an effective date of the 4TH day of FEBRUARY 1999, in the penalty of SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND AND 00/100 Dollars ($75,000.00), in favor of CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON do hereby continue said bond in force for the further term of one year beginning on the 4TH day of FEBRUARY 2000 and ending on the 4TH day of FEBRUARY 2001. LICENSE AND/OR PERMIT FOR FUTURE ACCESS DRIVE, 69 SWIFT STREET PROJECT PROVIDED, however, that said bond, as continued hereby, shall be subject to all its terms and conditions, except as herein modified, and that the liability of the said Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland under said bond and any and all continuations thereof shall in no event exceed in the aggregate the above named penalty, and that this certificate shall not be valid unless signed by said Principal. Witness: Signed, sealed and dated this 2ND day of APRIL 2001. (SEAL) Principal (SEAL) Principal FIDE71flY =ANDOSrr COMPANY OF MAR By: VERONICA PRICE, Attorney -in -Fact, J333 mcml Power of Attorney FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND HOME OFFICE: P.O. BOX 1227, BALTIMORE, MD 21203-1227 Know ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a corporation of the State of Maryland, by W. B. WALBRECHER, Vice -President, and T. E. SMITH, Assistant Secretary, in pursuance of authority granted by Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws f said Company, which are set forth on the reverse side hereof and are hereby certified to be in full and effe the date hereof, does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint Veronica F. PRICE, of Owings arylan p e and lawful agent and Attorney -in -Fact, to make, execute, seal and deliver, for, and on its be surety, s its act and deed: any and all bonds and undertakings and the execution of such bonds or u ings in nce of these presents, shall be as binding upon said Company, as fully and amply, to all intents an ses, as ' had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company at its o Baltim d., in their own proper persons. The said Assistant Secretary does hereby e� that the e�t set forth on the reverse side hereof is a true copy of Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of sa \�pany, an_ ow in force. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said eside affixed the Corporate Seal of the sai ELITY October, A.D. 1998. ° A< ATTEST: 0 T. E. Smith State of Maryland } ss: County of Baltimore ))) A�ssistant Secretary have hereunto subscribed their names and DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, this 15th day of T COMPANY OF MARYLAND Secretary W. B. Walbrecher Vice -President On this 15th day of October, A.D. 1998, before the subscriber, a Notary Public of the State of Maryland, duly commissioned and qualified, came W. B. Walbrecher, Vice -President and T. E. Smith, Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, to me personally known to be the individuals and officers described in and who executed the preceding instrument, and they each acknowledged the execution of the same, and being by me duly sworn, severally and each for himself deposeth and saith, that they are the said officers of the Company aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Company, and that the said Corporate Seal and their signatures as such officers were duly affixed and subscribed to the said iitstni*rient by the authority and direction of the said Corporation. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal the Jay and wear first above written. Carol J. Fa r Notary Puali;: My Commissi Expires: August 1, 20OG L 1428-4 EXTRACT FROM BY-LAWS OF FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND "Article VI, Section 2. The Chairman of the Board, or the President, or any Executive Vice -President, or any of the Senior Vice -Presidents or Vice -Presidents specially authorized so to do by the Board of Directors or by the Executive Committee, shall have power, by and with the concurrence of the Secretary or any one of the Assistant Secretaries, to appoint Resident Vice -Presidents, Assistant Vice -Presidents and Attorneys -in -Fact as the business of the Company may require, or to authorize any person or persons to execute on behalf of the Company any bonds, undertaking, recognizances, stipulations, policies, contracts, agreements, deeds, and releases and assignments of judgements, decrees, mortgages and instruments in the nature of mortgages,... and to affix the seal of the Company thereto." CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, do hereby certify that the original Power of Attorney of which the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy, is in full force and effect on the Gate of in -is ceniiicate; and I i do further certify that the Vice -President who executed the said Power of Attorney was one of the additional Vice -Presidents specially authorized by the Board of Directors to appoint any Attorney -in -Fact as provided in Article VI, Section 2, of the By -Laws of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND. This Power of Attorney and Certificate may be signed by facsimile under and by authority of the following resolution of the Board of Directors of the FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND at a meeting duly called and held on the 1 Oth day of May, 1990. RESOLVED: "That the facsimile or mechanically reproduced seal of the company and facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any Vice -President, Secretary, or Assistant Secretary of the Company, whether made heretofore or hereafter, wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company, shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed." IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the corporate seal of the said Company, this day of Assistant Secretary l MOUREUX, STONE & O'LEAL Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive (802) 878-4450 Essex Junction, Vermont05452 Fax (802) 878-3135 June 24, 1997 Joseph Segale Transportation Engineer Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission 66 Pearl Street P.O. Box 108 Essex Jct., VT 05452 Re: Swift Street PUD Traffic Report Review Dear Joe: As a condition of preliminary approval, the South Burlington Planning Commission has asked our client, Dan Morrissey, to submit a copy of the traffic report for the PUD he is proposing on Swift Street to Regional Planning for review and comment. Enclosed you will find a copy of the report along with the attachments you may need to complete the review. We would appreciate your review of this report. If you need any further information, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, J dy Carriere, E.I. cc. Dan Morrissey Civil • Environmental • Transportation • Planning • Landscape Architecture • Hydrogeology • Land Surveying 14 Morse Drive Essex Junction, Vermont 05452 Mr. Dan Morrissey Wright & Morrissey, Inc. P.O. Box 421 Burlington, VT 05402 Lr_. AOUREUX, STONE & O'LEAR . Consulting Engineers, Inc. RE: Revised Traffic Evaluation Proposed Swift Street PUD South Burlington, Vermont Dear Dan: June 24, 1997 WRIGHT & MORRISSEY, INC (802) 878-4450 Fax (802) 878-3135 As requested, we have prepared a traffic impact evaluation assessing the potential traffic congestion and safety impacts of the above -referenced project. The following presents the sources of background traffic data, an explanation of the study methodology, the results of the analyses, our conclusions and our recommendations. Project Data This project is a proposed planned unit development (PUD) involving three existing lots located at #57, #69 and #85 Swift Street in South Burlington. All three lots are located on the south side of Swift Street between Shelburne Road and Farrell Street, and are presently built upon with a mixture of residential and commercial uses. The projectwill retain the existing mini -storage facility located at the westerly edge of the PUD on the St. Armand parcel (#57 Swift Street) and the Vermont Gas office building to the east located at #85 Swift Street. Between those two existing uses, the two existing residential buildings will be demolished, and a new bank / office building constructed in their place. Of the four existing curb cuts serving #57 and #69 Swift Street, only the one located adjacent to the westerly property line of this project will be retained in order to provide access to the mini - storage facility. The proposed bank / office building will be served by a new curb cut located approximately 180 feet from the westerly property line. The existing driveway serving Vermont Gas will remain unchanged. Civil • Environmental 9 Transportation • Planning • Landscape Architecture • Hydrogeology • Land Surveying Mr. Dan Morrissey June 24, 1997 Page 2 Background Traffic Volumes As requested by Joe Weith, South Burlington City Planner, included in this study are the Shelburne Road / Swift Street, Swift Street / Project Access and the Swift Street / Farrell Street intersections. Turning movement patterns at the two existing intersections (Shelburne Road and Farrell Street) are based on counts conducted by this office on March 13, 19 and 20, 1997. Traffic volumes from those counts were factored to design hourly volumes (DHV's) on Swift Street using data from the Vermont Agency of Transportation's nearby Continuous Traffic Count Station D099 located on 1-189. Urban area growth rates, also compiled by the VAOT based on historical data, were then used to estimate 1997 and 2002 DHV's. These two years represent the anticipated commencement of construction and a five-year projection thereof. Those volumes were used in the following analyses to represent "background" conditions. Project -Generated Traffic The proposed 41,000 square foot office building will include 1,200 sq. ft. for a drive-in bank and 39,800 sq. ft. of office space (to be used for banking purposes). An estimate of the additional traffic which will be generated by this building was calculated using trip generation data published by the ITE' for land -use categories #912 - Drive-in Bank and #710 - General Office Building. Table 1 presents the resulting vehicular trip generation estimates. Table 1 Estimated Vehicular Trip Generation Use Average Weekday (vte/day) A.M. Peak Hour (vte/hour) P.M. Peak Hour (vte/hour) Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Drive-in Bank 536 8 6 14 25 27 52 General Office 699 83 10 93 16 78 94 Total 1,235 91 16 107 1 41 105 146 "Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 5th Edition (1991) and 5th Edition Update (1995)" Mr. Dan Morrissey June 24, 1997 Page 3 Anticipated turning movement patterns at the project access are based on turning patterns of traffic observed by this office at Vermont Gas in the aforementioned traffic counts. The trip distributions used in the analyses are included as Attachment A along with the DHV's for all three intersections which were analyzed. Traffic Congestion The potential traffic congestion impacts of this project were determined by performing intersection capacity analyses at the proposed Project Access intersection onto Swift Street as well as the Shelburne Road / Swift Street and Swift Street / Farrell Street intersections. Analyses for the Project Access intersection were performed for the two "with project" design year scenarios. Because this intersection will not exist without this project, no analyses of background "without project" conditions are possible. Both a.m. and p.m. peak hour periods were analyzed. The Shelburne Road and Farrell Street intersections were analyzed for background and with -project scenarios during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour periods for both 1997 and 2002 design years. Procedures used to perform the capacity analyses were obtained from the Highway Capacity ManuaF (HCM). The HCM uses " level of service" to define differing levels of traffic congestion. There are six levels of service, ranging from A to F. The criteria for intersection levels of service are shown in Table 2. Table 2 Intersection Level of Service Criteria Level of Service Average Delay (sec/veh) Expected Traffic Delay Signalized Unsignalized A <5 <5 Little or no delay B <15 <10 Short traffic delays C <25 <20 Average traffic delays D <40 <30 Long traffic delays E <60 <45 Very long traffic delays F >60 >45 Failure - extreme congestion "Highway Capacity Manual - Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 1994" Mr. Dan Morrissey June 24, 1997 Page 4 In urban areas, which includes the City of South Burlington, accepted engineering practice has been to maintain a minimum level of service D at signalized intersections. On a case by case basis, that can be lowered to level of service E in accordance with VAOT design policy'. At unsignalized intersections, the minor approach movements, particularly left -turns, typically experience lower levels of service due to their having to yield to other traffic. Consequently, traffic congestion conditions encountered by private driveways located on high -volume collectors and arterials can easily experience levels of service E and F. This is also caused, in part, by the differing delay criteria for unsignalized and signalized intersections, which is explained best by the following excerpt from the HCM: "The primary reason for this difference is that drivers expect different levels of performance from different kinds of transportation facilities. The expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher traffic volumes than an unsignalized intersection. Additionally, several driver behavior considerations combine to make delays at signalized intersections less onerous than at unsignalized intersections. For example, drivers at signalized intersections are able to relax during the red interval, whereas drivers on the minor approaches to unsignalized intersections must remain attentive to the task of identifying acceptable gaps and vehicle conflicts. Also, there is much more variability in the amount of delay experienced by individual drivers at unsignalized than at signalized intersections. For these reasons, it is considered that the total delay threshold for any given level of service is less for an unsignalized intersection than for a signalized intersection." Tables 3-5 present the levels of service and corresponding vehicular delays (seconds per vehicle) for each of the intersections included in this study. For traffic congestion conditions, the p.m. peak hour time period was found to control, due to the higher volumes of adjacent street traffic combined with higher volumes of exiting project -generated traffic. The results indicate that acceptable levels of service will be maintained with this project through the year 2002. A copy of the level of service calculations are enclosed as Attachment B. Traffic Safety Traffic safety conditions are influenced by many factors, including road width, pavement conditions, sight distances, lighting, proper signing and pavement markings, speed limits, alignment, number and spacing of driveways, etc. The following discusses several of the more important factors with respect to existing and proposed conditions at the proposed project access intersection. "Highway Design "Level of Service" Policy, Vermont Agency of Transportation, July 25, 1996" Mr. Dan Morrissey June 24, 1997 Page 5 Table 3 Swift Street / Proposed Project Access (Unsignalized) DHV's w/ Project A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour 1997 T2002 1997 F2002 Project Access NB All C (10.8) C (11.9) C (16.0) C (18.5) Swift Street WB LT A (3.4) A (3.5) A (3.5) A (3.6) OVERALL A (0.2) A (0.2) A (1.5) A (1.7) Table 4 Shelburne Road / Swift Street Intersection (Signalized) 1997 DHV's A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Background Tw/ Project Background w/ Project Shelburne Road SB T A (3.6) A (3.6) A (3.6) A (3.6) SB LT C (21.4) D (28.9) D (36.8) E (45.4) Swift Street WB RT B (10.4) B (10.5) C (15.1) C (16.3) WB LT C (18.3) C (18.5) D (26.5) D (31.6) Shelburne Road NB T/TR B (9.5) B (9.7) B (12.9) B (13.1) OVERALL B (8.3) B (9.0) B (11.7) B (12.8) 2002 DHV's A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Background w/ Project Background w/ Project Shelburne Road SB T A (4.0) A (4.0) A (3.9) A (3.9) SB LT C (23.3) D (34.1) E (44.8) E (58.1) Swift Street WB RT B (10.8) B (10.9) C (15.7) C (17.2) WB LT C (19.2) C (19.5) D (28.9) D (36.4) Shelburne Road NB T/TR B (10.3) B (10.6) C (15.9) C (16.4) OVERALL B (9.0) B (9.9) B (13.9) C (15.5) Mr. Dan Morrissey June 24, 1997 Page 6 Table 5 Swift Street / Farrell Street Intersection (Unsignalized) A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour 1997 DHV's Background Tw/ Project Background w/ Project VT Gas Driveway NB ALL C (16.9) C (17.5) C (16.7) C (17.9) Farrell Street SB LT/T C (16.5) C (16.9) D (21.3) D (23.5) SB RT B (6.0) B (6.1) A (5.0) B (5.1) Swift Street EB LT B (5.3) B (5.4) A (3.4) A (3.4) WB LT A (2.6) A (2.6) A (2.9) A (3.0) OVERALL A (2.7) A (2.8) B (5.5) B (5.8) A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour 2002 DHV's Background w/ Project Background T`w/roject VT Gas Driveway NB ALL D (20.9) D (21.7) D (20.4) D (21.9) Farrell Street SB LT/T C (19.9) D (20.6) D (29.3) E (32.9) SB RT B (6.5) B (6.7) B (5.3) B (5.4) Swift Street EB LT B (5.9) B (6.0) A (3.5) A (3.6) WB LT A (2.6) A (2.6) A (3.0) A (3.1) OVERALL A (3.1) 1 A (3.2) B (7.0) B (7.5) Swift Street is presently posted at 35 mph in the immediate vicinity of this project. At that speed, it is recommended that intersections have 385 feet of available sight distance in both directionsfrom the minor street (new project access) approach in order to maintain good traffic flow and traffic safety conditions4. In no case, should the available intersection sight distance be less than the minimum safe stopping sight distance, which at 35 mph equals 250 feet. "Intersection Sight Distance, NCHRP Report 383, Transportation Research Board, 1996" Mr. Dan Morrissey June 24, 1997 Page 7 To the west from the location of the proposed Project Access intersection, the available intersection sight distance is limited by a crest on Swift Street. Presently, 385 feet of sight distance is available as measured from an eye height of 3.5 feet at the project access to an oncoming vehicle height of 3.5 feet. To the east, the available intersection sight distance exceeds 1,000 feet. At 385 feet of available sight distance, an oncoming vehicle traveling at 35 mph is visible for 7.5 seconds before reaching the intersection. Observation at the proposed project access indicated that oncoming vehicles (from the west) were visible for approximately 10 seconds. This is due to the fact that vehicles have just turned onto Swift Street from Shelburne Road and therefore are not driving 35 mph the whole distance. In conclusion, the available sight distance is more than adequate in both directions based on the average speed of oncoming vehicles. Site grading should be designed however, to enhance the existing sight lines and to provide room for snow storage adjacent to Swift Street such that snowbanks to do not restrict the sight lines during winter months. Signal Warrants A signal warrant evaluation was conducted at the Swift Street / Farrell Street intersection to determine if traffic volumes with this proposed development would warrant a signal at this intersection. In this analyses, the observed March 19th and 20th 7:00 -9:00 a.m. and 2:00 - 6:00 p.m. traffic volumes were adjusted to average weekday volumes using AOT monthly adjustment factors. They were then factored upward to reflect year 2002 volumes using AOT growth factors, and project -generated traffic added. The five volume -related warrrants ( #1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume, #2 - Interruption of Continuous Traffic, #8 - Combination of Warrants 1 and 2, #9 - Four Hour Volumes, and #11 - Peak Hour Volume) were then analyzed. The results of the analyses indicate that the warrants will not be met with this project through the year 2002. Detailed results of these analyses can be found in Appendix C. Conclusions This evaluation has determined the potential traffic congestion and safety impacts resulting from a proposed office building and PUD to be located at #57, 69 and 85 Swift Street in South Burlington, Vermont. The following outlines our conclusions relating to background traffic congestion and safety conditions, and this project's potential impacts upon those conditions. With respect to traffic congestion, the results of the intersection capacity analyses indicate that this project will not create any significant traffic impacts, and that acceptable levels of service will be experienced during future design hour conditions at all intersections included in this study. Mr. Dan Morrissey June 24, 1997 Page 8 Similarly, it is not anticipated that this project will create adverse impacts with respect to existing traffic safety conditions in the immediate vicinity of this project. It is recommended that proper pavement markings, traffic signage and street lighting be provided at the proposed project access intersection, and that those items be shown on the proposed site plans for this project. The site grading should also be designed to enhance available intersection sight lines from the proposed Project Access. Lastly, evaluation of future average weekday traffic volumes at the Swift Street / Farrell Street intersection indicated that a signal will not be warranted at that intersection through the year 2002. We thank you for this opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions concerning the above or if we may be of additional assistance, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, Jody Carriere, E.I. Roger Dickinson, P.E. Q:\l 997\97037\97037TRA. RPT ATTACHMENT A Trip Distribution / Design Hour Volumes JOB 9 70 3 7 ` )rr S P u D LAMOUREUX & STONE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 Morse Drive ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 (802) 878-4450 PRODUCT 204-1 (Single Sneeu) 205-I (Padded) ®® Inc., Grft Mass. 01471. To Order PHONE TOLL FREE IAM225-00 SHEET NO. n OF 9 CALCULATED BY '_�� - C/ `RR i'Y k F DATE CHECKED BY SCALE Irl� A Ali rkAf ► � ,' DATE JOB I'?Q -�% )!r—, ST 'Jt> LAMOUREUX & STONE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 Morse Drive ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 (802) 878-4450 SHEET NO CALCULATED BY -31 `A kp' lfZ `C CHECKED BY SCALE OF DATE DATE jo, 7 3 `2 LAMOUREUX & STONE srez, r Sadie} - CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. SHEET NO. OF 14 Morse Drive CALCULATED BY DATE ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 (802) 878-4450 CHECKED BY DATE SCALE ............. ...... .... ........ . ... ........... . ............ ............. .............. . .... .... . .......... ............. ............. ............. .............. ........................ . . . .................. .. ... . ....... ............. .... ........ ............ ....... ..... ............. ............. .......... .. ............. .............. ............. ............. ... ....... PRODUCT 204-1 (Single Sheets) 205 1 (PAded) ®a Inc, Groton, Mass. 01471. To Order PHONE TOLL FREE 1-8*225-00 JOB 9"7a 3'7 )--T sr ,j LAMOUREUX & STONE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. SHEET NO. `` Vp {� 1 OF 14 Morse Drive CALCULATED BY`-). f9f1i :p`ie DATE ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 (802) 878-4450 CHECKED BY DATE _ SCALE 1. tr PRODUCT 204-1(Singb Shoets) 2U5-I (PAM) ®® Inc., Groton. Mass. 01471. To Order PHONE TOLL EPEE 1800-225-W ATTACHMENT B Level of Service Analyses HCS: Unsignalized Inte.L)ections Release 2.1d �UDPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Project Access (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ... ... ........... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 1997 AM DHV w/Project Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCI (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's 0 1 < 0 N 348 77 1 1 0 0 > 1 0 N! 14 551 1 1 4 0 1 0 1.42 ---------------- 0 > 0 < 0 12 4 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1.00 ---------------- 1.00 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d PUDPM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 386 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 883 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 883 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 425 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1075 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1075 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.98 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major IT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 952 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 298 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.97 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.97 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.97 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 290 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) ------ -------------------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- -------- ------ NB L 12 290 > 349 10.8 0.0 C 10.8 NB R WB L 4 883 > 20 1075 3.4 0.0 A 0.1 Intersection Delay = 0.2 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d PUDPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Project Access (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 2002 AM DHV w/Project Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's ------------ 0 1 < 0 N 375 77 1 1 0 0 > 1 0 N 14 595 1 1 4 0 1 0 1.42 ---------------- 0 > 0 < 0 12 4 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d PUDPM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 414 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 854 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 854 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 452 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1044 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1044 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.98 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1022 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 271 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.97 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.97 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.97 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 263 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement -------- (pcph) ------ (pcph) ------ (pcph)(sec/veh) ------------- (veh) ------- (sec/veh) ----- --------- NB L 12 263 > 318 11.9 0.0 C 11.9 NB R 4 854 > WB L 20 1044 3.5 0.0 A 0.1 Intersection Delay = 0.2 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d PUDPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Project Access (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 1997 PM DHV w/Project Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ----------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s SU/RV's (%) CV's (�) PCE's ------------ 0 1 < 0 N 420 34 1 1 0 0 > 1 0 N 7 546 1 1 4 0 1 0 1.42 ---------------- Northbound L T R 0 > 0 < 0 81 24 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Southbound L T R 0 0 0 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d PUDPM.HCO ----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 437 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 832 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 832 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 454 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1042 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1042 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 990 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 283 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 279 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement -------- (pcph) ------ (pcph) ------ (pcph)(sec/veh) ------------- (veh) ------- (sec/veh) ----- --------- NB L 81 279 > 329 16.0 1.4 C 16.0 NB R 24 832 > WB L 10 1042 3.5 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 1.5 sec/veh Page 2 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d PUDPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Project Access (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 2002 PM DHV w/Project Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCI (a) SU/RV's (%) CV's (o) PCE's ------------ 0 1 < 0 N 455 34 1 1 0 0 > 1 0 N 7 589 1 1 4 0 1 0 1.42 ---------------- 0 > 0 < 0 81 24 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf ) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d PUDPM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 472 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 798 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 798 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 489 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1002 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1002 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.98 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1068 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 255 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.98 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.98 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.98 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 251 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- NB L ------ 81 ------ 251 ------ > ------- ------- ----- --------- 298 18.5 1.6 C 18.5 NB R 24 798 > WB L 10 1002 3.6 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 1.7 sec/veh Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 1997 DHV AM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 0 1 1562 0.0 24.0 04/01/97 08:53:24 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES - - > 197 1 WIDTHS 11.0 v LANES II \ 340 12.0 1 -- 0 0.0 0 ------------------- + / 211 12.0 1 North \ /------------- 0 11423 I 143 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 0.0 136.3 I 0.0 I OVER P Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- N 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 0.90 1.00 1.00 0- N N Y 3 3 3 E 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 1.00 0.90 1.00 0- Y N Y 3 3 3 S 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 NO 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 W 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 0.90 0.90 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 1 Phase 6 1 LD/** ------------------------------------------------------------------------- + * + + * ++++! + ++++! North ------------ G/C=0.143 ----------- -------------------------------------------------- G/C=0.457 G/C=0.171 G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.000 G/C=0.000 G= 10.0 G= 32.0 G= 12.0" G= 0.0" G= 0.0 I G= 0.0" Y+R= 5.0 " Y+R= 6.0Y+R= I " I 5.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=21.4% OFF=75.7% OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 0.0% OFF= 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------- C= 70 sec G= 54.0 sec = 77.1% Y=16.0 sec = 22.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 1997 DHV AM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT -- vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- N-RT 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 N-TH 1562 1.00 1562 TH 1562 2 1.05 1640 0.00 0.00 N-LT 197 1.00 197 LT 197 1 1.00 197 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E-RT 340 1.00 340 RT 340 1 1.00 340 0.00 1.00 E-TH 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 E-LT 211 1.00 211 LT 211 1 1.00 211 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S-TR 143 1.00 143 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 S-TH 1423 1.00 1423 TH+TR 1566 3 1.26 1973 0.00 0.09 S-LT ------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet 04/01/97 08:53:24 Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of -------------------------------------------------- Sat- ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 0.967 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1728 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E- RT 1900 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.850 1.000 1.00 1615 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1787 S- TH+TR 1900 3 1.000 0.973 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.986 1.000 1.00 5473 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- vph vphg -- -- vph -- - N- TH 1640 3725 0.440 0.714 2661 0.616 N- LT Pri. 197 1728 0.114 0.171 296 0.666 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E- RT 340 1615 0.211 0.414 669 0.508 E- LT Pri. 211 1787 0.118 0.200 357 0.591 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S- TH+TR 1973 5473 .0.361 0.500 2736 0.721 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Cycle Length, C 70 sec Sum(v/s) = 0.593 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = 0.680 Swift Street PUD 97037 04/01/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 08:53:24 1997 DHV AM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Level -of -Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C dl DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - N- TH 0.616 .714 3.9 0.85 2661 16 0.32 3.6 A N- LT 0.666 .171 20.6 0.85 296 16 3.83 21.4 C ------------------------------------------------------------------> 5.5 B+ E- RT 0.508 .414 11.6 0.85 669 16 0.55 10.4 B E- LT 0.591 .200 19.3 0.85 357 16 1.89 18.3 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 13.4 B S- TH+TR 0.721 .500 10.4 0.85 2736 16 0.67 9.5 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 9.5 B+ Cycle= 70" Int Total 0.656________________________________________________> 8.3 B+ Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 1997 DHV AM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.66 Vehicle Delay ------------------------------------- Sq 21 i Phase l i Phase 2 1 Phase 3 i LD/** ------------------------------------- + * ++++� + ' ++++� /�\ I v *> I v North 04/01/97 08:53:24 8.3 Level of Service B+ * *>I v * * ------------------------------------- 43 ` G/C 1010" I G/G C 3240" I /C 12171 0" I Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 6.0" i Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=21.4% OFF=75.7% ----------------------------------- -- C= 70 sec G= 54.0 sec = 77.1% Y=16.0 sec = 22.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Width/ g/C i Service Rate Adj HCM L Maxi Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i Lanesi Reqd Used i ®C (vph) ®E Volume v/c I Delay I S 190% Queue i N Approach 5.5 B+ -------------------------------------------- i TH i 24/2 10.450 10.714 i 2661 i 2661 - ---- i 1640 ------ 10.616 1 - - --- 3.6 --- 1 A i ----- 231 -- fti i LT 1 11/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.155 10.171 i 224 i 296 i 197 10.666 i 21.4 i*C i 160 fti S Approach 9.5 B+ -------------------------------------------------------- i TH+TRi 36/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.370 10.500 i 2736 1 2736 1 1973 ---------------------- 10.721 9.5 i*B+i 325 fti E Approach 13.4 B i RT i 12/1 10.254 10.414 ---------- i 613 i 669 - ---- - - i 340 ------ - - 10.508 i --------------- -- --- 10.4 i*B+i 94 i i LT i 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.159 10.200 i 283 i 357 i 211 10.591 i 18.3 i 1 fti Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 1997 DHV AM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 0 1562 0.0 124.0 241 11.0 1 0 0.0 0 06/23/97 15:20:22 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES -------------------- \ 348 12.0 1 ------------------- 0 0.0 0 -- --- / 215 12.0 1 North /------------- 1423 176 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 36.0 0.0 PERMSV N N N N 3 0 OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- N 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 0.90 1.00 1.00 0- N N Y 3 3 3 E 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 1.00 0.90 1.00 0- Y N Y 3 3 3 S 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 NO 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 W 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 0.90 0.90 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 1 Phase 6 1 LD/** ------------------------------------------------------------------------- + * ++++I + I ++++I *> v i v ^ I v North * *>� ------------ G/C=0.143 ----------------- G/C=0.457 -------------------------------------------- G/C=0.171 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.000 G= 10.0 G= 32.0 I G= 12.0" G= 0.0 G= 0.0" G= 0.0" Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 6.0" I Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 0.0" Y+R= 0.0" Y+R= 0.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=21.4% I OFF=75.7% I OFF= 0.0% OFF= 0.0% OFF= 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------- C= 70 sec G= 54.0 sec = 77.1% Y=16.0 sec = 22.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 1997 DHV AM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ N-RT 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 N-TH 1562 1.00 1562 TH 1562 2 1.05 1640 0.00 0.00 N-LT 241 1.00 241 LT 241 1 1.00 241 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E-RT 348 1.00 348 RT 348 1 1.00 348 0.00 1.00 E-TH 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 E-LT 215 1.00 215 LT 215 1 1.00 215 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S-TR 176 1.00 176 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 S-TH 1423 1.00 1423 TH+TR 1599 3 1.26 2015 0.00 0.11 S-LT ------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet 06/23/97 15:20:22 Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of -------------------------------------------------- Sat- ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N- TH 1900 2 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 0.967 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1728 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E- RT 1900 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.850 1.000 1.00 1615 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1787 S- TH+TR 1900 3 1.000 0.974 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.983 1.000 1.00 5460 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- -- vph vphg -- -- vph -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------ N- TH 1640 3725 0.440 0.714 2661 0.616 N- LT Pri. 241 1728 0.140 0.171 296 0.814 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E- RT 348 1615 0.215 0.414 669 0.520 E- LT Pri. 215 1787 0.120 0.200 357 0.602 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S- TH+TR 2015 5460 0.369 0.500 2730 0.738 -----------------------------------------------'------------------- Cycle Length, C 70 sec Sum(v/s) = 0.629 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = 0.722 Swift Street PUD 97037 06/23/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 15:20:22 1997 DHV AM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Level -of -Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C dl DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - N- TH 0.616 .714 3.9 0.85 2661 16 0.32 3.6 A N- LT 0.814 .171 21.2 0.85 296 16 10.83 28.9 D+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 6.8 B+ E- RT 0.520 .414 11.6 0.85 669 16 0.60 10.5 B E- LT 0.602 .200 19.4 0.85 357 16 2.05 18.5 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 13.5 B S- TH+TR 0.738 .500 10.5 0.85 2730 16 0.77 9.7 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 9.7 B+ Cycle= 7011 Int Total 0.674________________________________________________> 9.0 B+ Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 1997 DHV AM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.67 Vehicle Delay ------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 LD/** ------------------------------------- 1 + * ^ + I ^ I I v I v I **** North 06/23/97 15:20:22 9.0 Level of Service B+ 1 I A 1 v * *>I * * * * ----------- ---------------- G/C=0.143 G/C=0.457 I G/C=0.171 1 G= 10.0" I G= 32.0" I G= 12.0" Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 6.0" I Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=21.4% I OFF=75.7% 1 ------------------------------------- C= 70 sec G= 54.0 sec = 77.1% Y=16.0 sec = 22.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane Width/I g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi I Group I Lanesl Reqd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Used I CSC (vph) CAE IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I N Approach 6.8 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I TH 1 24/2 10.450 10.714 12661 12661 11640 10.616 1 3.6 1 A 1231 fti LT 1 11/1 10.182 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.171 I 224 I 296 1 241 10.814 1 28.9 I*D+I 195 fti S Approach 9.7 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I TH+TRI 36/3 10.378 ---------------------------------------------------------- 10.500 12730 12730 1 2015 10.738 I 9.7 =-------------------- I*B+l 332 ftI E Approach 13.5 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I RT 112/1 10.259 10.414 1 613 1 669 I 348 I0.520 1 10.5 1 B 1 198 fti I LT 1 12/1 10.161 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I0.200 1 283 1 357 I 215 10.602 1 18.5 I*C+l 168 ftI Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 1997 DHV PM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - I I II 0 1 1548 1 223 II 0.0 1 24.0 1 11.0 II 0 i 2 1 1 II I I II / I \ 0 0.0 0 / ------------------- 0 0.0 0 -- ------------------- 0 0.0 0 \ -------------------- I LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 1 I 03/31/97 15:02:32 Area Location Type: NONCBD I Key: VOLUMES -- > I WIDTHS 1 v LANES \ -------------------- 338 12.0 1 -- ------------------- 0 0.0 0 / ------------------- 238 12.0 1 \ I II I i II 0 1 1898 1 II 0.0 1 36.0 i II 0 I 3 I it I I / ------------- I 173 ( Phasing: 0.0 1 0 1 I /I\ I I North I SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 0.90 1.00 1.00 0- N N Y 3 3 3 E 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 1.00 0.90 1.00 0- Y N Y 3 3 3 S 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 NO 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 W 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 0.90 0.90 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 1 Phase 6 1 LD/** ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I +*^ I + I I I I I 1 +*++++1 + 1 ++++1 I I I /I\ I + *> I + I I I I I I I v I v I ****I I I I I I I ^ I v I I I I North I I **>I I I I I I I I ** I I I I I I I ** I I I I I ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 G/C=0.133 1 G/C=0.522 ( G/C=0.167 i G/C=0.000 1 G/C=0.000 1 G/C=0.000 I 1 G= 12.0" 1 G= 47.0" 1 G= 15.0" 1 G= 0.0" 1 G= 0.0" 1 G= 0.0" I l Y+R= 5.0" l Y+R= 6.0" 1 Y+R= 5.0" 1 Y+R= 0.0" l Y+R= 0.0" l Y+R= 0.0" i 1 OFF-- 0.0% I OFF=18.9% 1 OFF=77.8% 1 OFF-- 0.0% 1 OFF-- 0.0% 1 OFF-- 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------- C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 1997 DHV PM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT -- vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- N-RT 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 N-TH 1548 1.00 1548 TH 1548 2 1.05 1625 0.00 0.00 N-LT 223 1.00 223 LT 223 1 1.00 223 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E-RT 338 1.00 338 RT 338 1 1.00 338 0.00 1.00 E-TH 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 E-LT 238 1.00 238 LT 238 1 1.00 238 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S-TR 173 1.00 173 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 S-TH 1898 1.00 1898 TH+TR 2071 3 1.26 2609 0.00 0.08 S-LT ------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet 03/31/97 15:02:32 Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of -------------------------------------------------- Sat- ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 0.967 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1728 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E- RT 1900 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.850 1.000 1.00 1615 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1787 S- TH+TR 1900 3 1.000 0.973 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.987 1.000 1.00 5478 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- -- vph vphg -- -- vph -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------ N- TH 1625 3725 0.436 0.744 2773 0.586 N- LT Pri. 223 1728 0.129 0.156 269 0.829 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E- RT 338 1615 0.209 0.378 610 0.554 E- LT Pri. 238 1787 0.133 0.189 338 0.704 ---------------------------- S- TH+TR 2609 -------------------------------------- 5478 0.476 0.556 3043 0.857 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Cycle Length, C 90 sec SUM (v/s) = 0.739 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = 0.821 Swift Street PUD 97037 03/31/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 15:02:32 1997 DHV PM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Level -of -Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C dl DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - N- TH 0.586 .744 4.0 0.85 2773 16 0.24 3.6 A N- LT 0.829 .156 28.0 0.85 269 16 12.99 36.8 D ------------------------------------------------------------------> 7.6 B+ E- RT 0.554 .378 16.7 0.85 610 16 0.85 15.1 C+ E- LT 0.704 .189 26.0 0.85 338 16 4.44 26.5 D+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 19.8 C+ S- TH+TR 0.857 .556 12.9 0.85 3043 16 1.91 12.9 B ------------------------------------------------------------------> 12.9 B Cycle= 9011 Int Total 0.741 =___________=_______________________--_-----> 11.7 B Swift Street PUD 97037 03/31/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 15:02:32 1997 DHV PM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.74 Vehicle Delay 11.7 Level of Service B ------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 LD/** ------------------------------------- i + * ^ I + I I I + * ++++I + 1 ++++I /I\ I + *> I + I I I I v I v I I I I v i North I I * *>I I I I I ** I I ------------------------------------- I G/C=0.133 I G/C=0.522 I G/C=0.167 I I G= 12.0" I G= 47.0" I G= 15.0" I l Y+R= 5.0" l Y+R= 6.0" l Y+R= 5.0" 1 i OFF-- 0.0% I OFF--18.9% I OFF=77.8% 1 ------------------------------------- C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane (Width/I g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Max) I Group I Lanesl Reqd Used I -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- @C (vph) @E iVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I N Approach 7.6 B+ I TH 1 24/2 10.456 10.744 1 2773 1 2773 1 1625 10.586 1 3.6 1 A 1 263 fti I LT 1 11/1 10.195 10.156 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 156 1 263 1 223 10.829 1 36.8 I*D 1 237 ftl S Approach 12.9 B I TH+TRI 36/3 10.485 10.556 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3037 1 3043 1 2609 10.857 1. 12.9 I*B 1 491 ftI E Approach 19.8 C+ I RT 1 12/1 10.272 10.378 1 525 1 610 1 338 10.554 1 15.1 1 C+1 263 fti I LT 1 12/1 10.198 10.189 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 222 1 337 1 238 10.704 1 26.5 I*D+l 243 ftI Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 1997 DHV PM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 0 1548 0.0 124.0 242 11.0 1 0 0.0 0 06/23/97 15:14:32 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > I WIDTHS v LANES -------------------- \ 385 12.0 1 ------------------- 0 0.0 0 /I\ -- --- / 272 12.0 1 North / ------------- I 1898 I 188 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 36.0 0.0 PERMSV N N N N 3 1 0 OVERLP Y Y Y Y I LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- N 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 0.90 1.00 1.00 0- N N Y 3 3 3 E 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 1.00 0.90 1.00 0- Y N Y 3 3 3 S 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 NO 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 W 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 0.90 0.90 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 1 Phase 6 1 LD/** ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 + * ++++I ++++I /I\ I v *' I v I ****I v l North I * *> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 G/C=0.133 I G/C=0.522 I G/C=0.167 I G/C=0.000 1 G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.000 1 G= 12.0" 1 G= 47.0 G= 15.0 G= 0.0" I G= 0.0 G= 0.0" 1 Y+R= 5.0" 1 Y+R= 6.0" Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 0.0" 1 Y+R= 0.0" Y+R= 0.0" 1 OFF= 0.0% 1 OFF=18.9% ( OFF=77.8% i OFF= 0.0% 1 OFF= 0.0% 1 OFF= 0.0% 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 1997 DHV PM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ N-RT 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 N-TH 1548 1.00 1548 TH 1548 2 1.05 1625 0.00 0.00 N-LT 242 1.00 242 LT 242 1 1.00 242 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E-RT 385 1.00 385 RT 385 1 1.00 385 0.00 1.00 E-TH 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 E-LT 272 1.00 272 LT 272 1 1.00 272 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S-TR 188 1.00 188 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 S-TH 1898 1.00 1898 TH+TR 2086 3 1.26 2628 0.00 0.09 S-LT ------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet 06/23/97 15:14:33 Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of -------------------------------------------------- Sat- ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N- TH 1900 2 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 0.967 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1728 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E- RT 1900 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.850 1.000 1.00 1615 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1787 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S- TH+TR 1900 3 1.000 0.973 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.986 1.000 1.00 5474 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- -- vph vphg -- -- vph -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------ N- TH 1625 3725 0.436 0.744 2773 0.586 N- LT Pri. 242 1728 0.140 0.156 269 0.900 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E- RT 385 1615 0.238 0.378 610 0.631 E- LT Pri. 272 1787 0.152 0.189 338 0.805 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S- TH+TR 2628 5474 0.480 0.556 3041 0.864 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Cycle Length, C 90 sec Sum(v/s) = 0.772 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = 0.858 Swift Street PUD 97037 06/23/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 15:14:33 1997 DHV PM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Level -of -Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C dl DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - N- TH 0.586 .744 4.0 0.85 2773 16 0.24 3.6 A N- LT 0.900 .156 28.4 0.85 269 16 21.25 45.4 E+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 9.0 B+ E- RT 0.631 .378 17.4 0.85 610 16 1.50 16.3 C+ E- LT 0.805 .189 26.5 0.85 338 16 9.05 31.6 D+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 22.6 C S- TH+TR 0.864 .556 13.0 0.85 3041 16 2.04 13.1 B ------------------------------------------------------------------> 13.1 B Cycle= 9011 Int Total 0.758________________________________________________> 12.8 B Swift Street PUD 97037 06/23/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 15:14:33 1997 DHV PM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.76 Vehicle Delay 12.8 Level of Service B Sq 21 LD/** /I\ North I ------------------------------------- I Phase l I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I ------------------------------------- + * " + + * ++++ + I ++++ + *> + v v **** I I I v ------------------------------------- I G/C=0.133 G/C=0.522 I G/C=0.167 G= 12.0 I G= 47.0" G= 15.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 6.0" I Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=18.9% OFF=77.8% ----------------------------------- -- C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane (Width/I g/C I Service Rate Adj I I HCM I L I90% Maxi I Group I Lanes) Reqd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Used I @C (vph) @E Ivolume I v/c I Delay I S I Queue I N Approach 9.0 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I TH 124/2 10.456 10.744 12773 12773 11625 10.586 I 3.6 I A 263 ftI I LT 111/1 I0.205 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.156 I 156 I 263 I 242 I0.900 I 45.4 I*E+ 257 ftI S Approach 13.1 B ------------------------------ I TH+TRI 36/3 10.488 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.556 -- - - -- 13035 13041 --- - -- - 12628 --------------------------- 10.864 I. 13.1 I*B 1495 ftI E Approach 22.6 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I RT 112/1 10.299 10.378 I 525 I 610 385 10.631 I 16.3 I C+I 299 ftI I LT 112/1 10.216 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.189 I 222 I 337 272 I0.805 I 31.6 I*D+I 277 ftI Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 2002 DHV AM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 0 1687 , 213 ` 0.0 24.0 11.0 04/01/97 08:59:03 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES \--367 12.0--1------ -- 0 0.0 0 ------------------- 0 0.0 0 / + / 228 12.0 1 North ------------------- 0 0.0 0 -- ------------------- \ /------------- --------0---0_0--0--\ II 0 , 1537 I 154 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 0.36.0. LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. I II 0 13 I 0 OVERLP Y Y Y Y III I I LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- N 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 0.90 1.00 1.00 0- N N Y 3 3 3 E 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 1.00 0.90 1.00 0- Y N Y 3 3 3 S 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 NO 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 W 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 0.90 0.90 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 1 Phase 5 I Phase 6 I LD/** ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I + * I + + * ++++ I ++++I v I v i v*** North I I * * I I ------------ I G/C=0.143 -------------------- I G/C=0.457 I ----- G/C=0.171 ------ I G/C=0.000 --------------- I --------------- G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.000 G= 10.0" I G= 32.0" I G= 12.0" I G= 0.0" I G= 0.0" I G= 0.0" Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 6.0" I Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=21.4% I OFF=75.7% I OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------- C= 70 sec G= 54.0 sec = 77.1% Y=16.0 sec = 22.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 2002 DHV AM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT -- vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- N-RT 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 N-TH 1687 1.00 1687 TH 1687 2 1.05 1771 0.00 0.00 N-LT 213 1.00 213 LT 213 1 1.00 213 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E-RT 367 1.00 367 RT 367 1 1.00 367 0.00 1.00 E-TH 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 E-LT 228 1.00 228 LT 228 1 1.00 228 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S-TR 154 1.00 154 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 S-TH 1537 1.00 1537 TH+TR 1691 3 1.26 2131 0.00 0.09 S-LT ------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet 04/01/97 08:59:03 Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of -------------------------------------------------- Sat- ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 0.967 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1728 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E- RT 1900 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.850 1.000 1.00 1615 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1787 S- TH+TR 1900 3 1.000 0.973 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.986 1.000 1.00 5473 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- vph vphg -- -- vph -- - N- TH 1771 3725 0.475 0.714 2661 0.666 N- LT Pri. 213 1728 0.123 0.171 296 0.720 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E- RT 367 1615 0.227 0.414 669 0.549 E- LT Pri. 228 1787 0.128 0.200 357 0.639 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S- TH+TR 2131 5473 0.389 0.500 2736 0.779 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Cycle Length, C 70 sec Sum(v/s) = 0.640 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = 0.735 Swift Street PUD 97037 04/01/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 08:59:03 2002 DHV AM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Level -of -Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C dl DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - N- TH 0.666 .714 4.1 0.85 2661 16 0.45 4.0 A N- LT 0.720 .171 20.8 0.85 296 16 5.59 23.3 C ------------------------------------------------------------------> 6.0 B+ E- RT 0.549 .414 11.8 0.85 669 16 0.74 10.8 B E- LT 0.639 .200 19.5 0.85 357 16 2.66 19.2 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 14.0 B S- TH+TR 0.779 .500 10.9 0.85 2736 16 1.06 10.3 B ------------------------------------------------------------------> 10.3 B Cycle= 70" Int Total 0.709________________________________________________> 9.0 B+ Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 2002 DHV AM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.71 Vehicle Delay Sq 21 LD/** /i\ North I ------------------------------------- I Phase l I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I ------------------------------------- + * ++++I + I ++++I v v v 04/01/97 08:59:03 9.0 Level of Service B+ ------------------------------------- /10 C 143 0" I G/C 3240" I G/C 1210" GI OFF= 0.0% I OFF=21.4% OFF=75.7% ------------------------------------- C= 70 sec G= 54.0 sec = 77.1% Y=16.0 sec = 22.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane (Width/I g/C Service Rate Adj I HCM L I90% Maxl I Group I Lanesl Reqd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Used I CSC (vph) ®E (Volume v/c I Delay I S I Queue I N Approach 6.0 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I TH 124/2 10.482 10.714 12661 1 2661 11771 10.666 I 4.0 I A 1249 ftI I LT 111/1 10.165 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.171 I 224 I 296 I 213 I0.720 I 23.3 I*C 1173 fti S Approach 10.3 B ----------------------------------------------------------------- I TH+TRI 36/3 10.396 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I0.500 1 2736 12736 12131 10.779 -------------- [ 10.3 I*B 1351 fti E Approach 14.0 B --------------------------------------- I RT 112/1 10.271 10.414 I 613 1 - ---- 669 - ---- - - I 367 - ---------------------- ----- 10.549 I 10.8 1I 209 ) I LT 112/1 10.169 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I0.200 1 283 I 357 I 228 10.639 I 19.2 I*C+ I ftj Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 2002 DHV AM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 0 1687 0.0 124.0 257 11.0 1 0 0.0 0 06/23/97 15:22:36 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES -------------------- \ 375 12.0 1 ------------------- 0 0.0 0 /I\ -- --- / 232 12.0 1 North /------------- 1537 187 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 36.0 0.0 i PERMSV N N N N 3 O I OVERLP Y Y Y Y I LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- N 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 0.90 1.00 1.00 0- N N Y 3 3 3 E 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 1.00 0.90 1.00 0- Y N Y 3 3 3 S 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 NO 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 W 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 0.90 0.90 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sq 21 I Phase 11 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 I Phase 4 1 Phase 5 I Phase 6 1 LD/** ------------------------------------------------------------------------- + * ++++� + I ++++I v I v I ****I v North I * *>I ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I G/C=0.143 I G/C=0.457 I G/C=0.171 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.000 G= 10.0 G= 32.0 G= 12.0 G= 0.0 I G= 0.0 G= 0.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 6.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 0.0" Y+R= 0.0" Y+R= 0.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=21.4% ( OFF=75.7% I OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------- C= 70 sec G= 54.0 sec = 77.1% Y=16.0 sec = 22.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 2002 DHV AM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.203 - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ N-RT 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 N-TH 1687 1.00 1687 TH 1687 2 1.05 1771 0.00 0.00 N-LT 257 1.00 257 LT 257 1 1.00 257 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E-RT 375 1.00 375 RT 375 1 1.00 375 0.00 1.00 E-TH 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 E-LT 232 1.00 232 LT 232 1 1.00 232 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S-TR 187 1.00 187 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 S-TH 1537 1.00 1537 TH+TR 1724 3 1.26 2172 0.00 0.11 S-LT ------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.203 - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet 06/23/97 15:22:37 Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of -------------------------------------------------- Sat- ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N- TH 1900 2 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 0.967 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1728 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E- RT 1900 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.850 1.000 1.00 1615 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1787 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH+TR 1900 3 1.000 0.974 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.984 1.000 1.00 5461 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.203 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- -- vph vphg -- -- vph -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------ N- TH 1771 3725 0.475 0.714 2661 0.666 N- LT Pri. 257 1728 0.149 0.171 296 0.868 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E- RT 375 1615 0.232 0.414 669 0.561 E- LT Pri. 232 1787 0.130 0.200 357 0.650 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S- TH+TR 2172 5461 0.398 0.500 2731 0.795 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Cycle Length, C 70 sec Sum(v/s) = 0.676 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = 0.776 Swift Street PUD 97037 06/23/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 15:22:37 2002 DHV AM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Level -of -Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C dl DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - N- TH 0.666 .714 4.1 0.85 2661 16 0.45 4.0 A N- LT 0.868 .171 21.5 0.85 296 16 15.88 34.1 D ------------------------------------------------------------------> 7.8 B+ E- RT 0.561 .414 11.9 0.85 669 16 0.82 10.9 B E- LT 0.650 .200 19.6 0.85 357 16 2.88 19.5 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 14.2 B S- TH+TR 0.795 .500 11.0 0.85 2731 16 1.21 10.6 B ------------------------------------------------------------------> 10.6 B Cycle= 7011 Int Total 0.726________________________________________________> 9.9 B+ Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 2002 DHV AM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.73 Vehicle Delay Sq 21 LD/** North I ------------------------------------- Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 ---- + l * + I A + * ++++I + > + I ++++I * I + v I v I ****I I v I 06/23/97 15:22:37 9.9 Level of Service B+ ------------------------------------- G/C=0.143 G/C=0.457 1 G/C=0.171 l 1 G= 10.0" G= 32.011 I G= 12.01- l Y+R= 5.011 Y+R= 6.0" l Y+R= 5.0-- OFF= 0.0% 1 OFF=21.4% l OFF=75.7% ----------------------------------- C= 70 sec G= 54.0 sec -- = 77.1% Y=16.0 sec = 22.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane Width/I g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxl I Group I Lanes Regd Used ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I CSC (vph) CAE IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I N Approach 7.8 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I TH 1 24/2 10.482 10.714 1 2661 1 2661 11771 10.666 I 4.0 1 A 1 249 ftI I LT 1 11/1 10.191 10.171 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 224 1 296 I 257 10.868 I 34.1 I*D 1 208 ftl S Approach 10.6 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH+TRI 36/3 10.404 I0.500 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2731 1 2731 1 2172 10.795 I. 10.6 I*B 1 358 ftI E Approach 14.2 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I RT 1 12/1 10.275 10.414 I 613 1 669 1 375 10.561 1 10.9 1 B 1 214 fti I LT 1 12/1 10.171 10.200 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I 283 1 357 I 232 I0.650 1 19.5 I*C+I 182 ftI I Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 2002 DHV PM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 0 ( 1672 0.0 124.0 241 11.0 1 \ \ 0 0.0 0 04/01/97 08:30:09 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES - - > WIDTHS v LANES -------------------- \ 365 12.0 1 -- 0 0.0 0 ------------------- / 257 12.0 1 North /------------- 2049 187 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 36.0 0.0 PERMSV N N N N 3 0 OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk. Hr. Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr. Type ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 0.90 1.00 1.00 0- N N Y 3 3 3 E 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 1.00 0.90 1.00 0- Y N Y 3 3 3 S 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 NO 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 W ---- 0.0 ----- 2.0 -------------- 2.0 2.0 NO ------- 0 --- 0 0.90 -------------- 0.90 0.90 0- -------- N -------- N N 3 -------- 3 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 1 Phase 6 1 LD/** ------------------------------------------------------------------------- + * + + * ++++I + + *> I + v i v *r*** I I North * * ------------ G/C=0.133 ------------------ I G/C=0.522 I ------------------------------------------- G/C=0.167 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.000 G= 12.0" G= 47.0 G= 15.0 G= 0.0" I G= 0.0" G= 0.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 6.0" I Y+R= 5.0" ' Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0" Y+R= 0.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=18.9% I OFF=77.8% OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 0.0% OFF= 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------- C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 2002 DHV PM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ N-RT 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 N-TH 1672 1.00 1672 TH 1672 2 1.05 1756 0.00 0.00 N-LT 241 1.00 241 LT 241 1 1.00 241 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E-RT 365 1.00 365 RT 365 1 1.00 365 0.00 1.00 E-TH 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 E-LT 257 1.00 257 LT 257 1 1.00 257 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S-TR 187 1.00 187 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 S-TH 2O49 1.00 2049 TH+TR 2236 3 1.26 2817 0.00 0.08 S-LT ------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet 04/01/97 08:30:09 Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of -------------------------------------------------- Sat- ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N- TH 1900 2 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 0.967 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1728 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E- RT 1900 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.850 1.000 1.00 1615 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1787 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S- TH+TR 1900 3 1.000 0.973 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.987 1.000 1.00 5478 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- -- vph vphg -- -- vph -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------ N- TH 1756 3725 0.471 0.744 2773 0.633 N- LT Pri. 241 1728 0.140 0.156 269 0.896 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E- RT 365 1615 0.226 0.378 610 0.598 E- LT Pri. 257 1787 0.144 0.189 338 0.760 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S- TH+TR 2817 5478 0.514 0.556 3043 0.926 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Cycle Length, C 90 sec Sum(v/s) = 0.798 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = 0.886 Swift Street PUD 97037 04/01/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 08:30:09 2002 DHV PM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Level -of -Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C dl DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - N- TH 0.633 .744 4.2 0.85 2773 16 0.34 3.9 A N- LT 0.896 .156 28.3 0.85 269 16 20.71 44.8 E+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 8.9 B+ E- RT 0.598 .378 17.1 0.85 610 16 1.18 15.7 C+ E- LT 0.760 .189 26.3 0.85 338 16 6.60 28.9 D+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 21.2 C S- TH+TR 0.926 .556 13.9 0.85 3043 16 4.10 15.9 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 15.9 C+ Cycle= 90° Int Total 0.800________________________________________________> 13.9 B Swift Street PUD 97037 04/01/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 08:30:09 2002 DHV PM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.80 Vehicle Delay 13.9 Level of Service B Sq 21 LD/** /I\ North I ------------------------------------- I Phase l I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I ------------------------------------- + * ++++ I + ++++ I + *> + I v I v I ****I ------------------------------------- I/12 C 10" I G/C 4750" I G22 /C 1510" G I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=18.9% I OFF=77.8% ------------------------------------- C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ane LGroup lidth/ Serice ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IWLanesl Regdg/Cused I ®C (vph)R®EelVolumel v/c I Delay I S 190% QueueXI N Approach 8.9 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I TH 124/2 10.487 10.744 12773 12773 11756 10.633 I 3.9 I A 1284 fti I LT 111/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I0.205 10.156 I 156 I 263 I 241 10.896 I 44.8 I*E+I 256 ftI S Approach 15.9 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH+TRI 36/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.519 10.556 13037 13043 12817 10.926 1 15.9 I*C+I 530 ftI E Approach 21.2 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I RT 112/1 10.288 10.378 I 525 I 610 I 365 10.598 I 15.7 I C+I 284 ftI I LT 112/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I0.208 10.189 I 222 I 337 I 257 10.760 I 28.9 I*D+I 262 ftI Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 2002 DHV PM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 0 1672 0.0 124.0 260 11.0 1 0 0.0 0 05/13/97 13:36:37 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES -------------------- \ 412 12.0 1 -- 0 0.0 0 ------------------- / 291 12.0 1 North /------------- 2049 I 202 I Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 36.0 0.0 PERMSV N N N N 3 0 OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- N 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 0.90 1.00 1.00 0- N N Y 3 3 3 E 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 1.00 0.90 1.00 0- Y N Y 3 3 3 S 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 NO 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 W 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 0.90 0.90 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 1 Phase 6 1 LD/** ------------------------------------------------------------------------- +* + A v v v***� North * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------- G/C=0.133 G/C=0.522 G/C=0.167 G/C=0.000 G/C=0.000 G/C=0.000 G= 12.0" G= 47.0" G= 15.0" G= 0.0 G= 0.0" G= 0.0" Y+R= 5.0- I Y+R= 6.0" Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0- Y+R= 0.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=18.9% OFF=77.8% OFF= 0.0% OFF= 0.0% OFF= 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------- C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 2002 DHV PM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ N-RT 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 N-TH 1672 1.00 1672 TH 1672 2 1.05 1756 0.00 0.00 N-LT 260 1.00 260 LT 260 1 1.00 260 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E-RT 412 1.00 412 RT 412 1 1.00 412 0.00 1.00 E-TH 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 E-LT 291 1.00 291 LT 291 1 1.00 291 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S-TR 202 1.00 202 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 S-TH 2O49 1.00 2049 TH+TR 2251 3 1.26 2836 0.00 0.09 S-LT 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet 05/13/97 13:36:37 Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of -------------------------------------------------- Sat- ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N- TH 1900 2 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 0.967 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1728 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E- RT 1900 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.850 1.000 1.00 1615 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1787 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S- TH+TR 1900 3 1.000 0.973 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.987 1.000 1.00 5474 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet- Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- -- vph vphg -- -- vph -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------ N- TH 1756 3725 0.471 0.744 2773 0.633 N- LT Pri. 260 1728 0.151 0.156 269 0.967 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E- RT 412 1615 0.255 0.378 610 0.675 E- LT Pri. 291 1787 0.163 0.189 338 0.861 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S- TH+TR 2836 5474 0.518 0.556 3041 0.933 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Cycle Length, C 90 sec Sum(v/s) = 0.831 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = 0.924 Swift Street PUD 97037 05/13/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 13:36:37 2002 DHV PM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Level -of -Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C dl DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - N- TH 0.633 .744 4.2 0.85 2773 16 0.34 3.9 A N- LT 0.967 .156 28.7 0.85 269 16 33.72 58.1 E ------------------------------------------------------------------> 10.9 B E- RT 0.675 .378 17.8 0.85 610 16 2.07 17.2 C+ E- LT 0.861 .189 26.9 0.85 338 16 13.60 36.4 D ------------------------------------------------------------------> 25.2 D+ S- TH+TR 0.933 .556 14.0 0.85 3041 16 4.48 16.4 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 16.4 C+ Cycle= 90" Int Total 0.817________________________________________________> 15.5 C+ Swift Street PUD 97037 05/13/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 13:36:37 2002 DHV PM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.82 Vehicle Delay 15.5 Level of Service C+ Sq 21 LD/** North ------------------------------------- Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 ------------------------------------- + * ++++ I + I ++++ v v I I I v I ------------------------------------- 33 22 G/C 1210" I G/C 4750" I G/C 1510" I OFF= 0.0% I OFF=18.9% I OFF=77.8% ----------------------------------- -- C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Width/I g/C Service Rate Adj I HCM L 190% Maxj Group Lanes I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reqd Used I ®C (vph) ®E lVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue N Approach 10.9 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH 1 24/2 10.487 10.744 1 2773 1 2773 1 1756 10.633 1 3.9 1 A 1 284 ftj LT 1 11/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.215 10.156 1 156 1 263 1 260 10.967 1 58.1 '1*E 1 276 ftj S Approach 16.4 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH+TRI 36/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.523 10.556 1 3035 1 3041 1 2836 10.933 1- 16.4 I*C+l 534 ftj E Approach 25.2 D+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RT 1 12/1 10.314 10.378 1 525 1 610 1 412 10.675 1 17.2 1 C+1 320 ftj LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.226 10.189 1 222 1 337 1 291 10.861 1 36.4 J*D 1 297 ftj H S: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. Morse Drive _.sex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Farrell Street (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst .... .. ........... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 1997 AM DHV Background Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCIs (�) SU/RVIs (�) CVIs (�) PCEIs ------------ 0 > 1 < 0 N 170 127 51 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 --------------- 0 > 1 < 0 N 9 360 287 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 ---------------- 0 > 1 < 0 19 1 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 > 1 1 62 2 172 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet for TWSC Intersection • ------------------------------------------------------ Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 152 504 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1160 769 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1160 769 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.78 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 178 647 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1410 843 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1410 843 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.80 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.77 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 978 860 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 335 386 Capacity Adjustment Factor ,ue to Impeding Movements 0.77 0.77 7ement Capacity: (pcph) 257 296 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 922 838 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 310 346 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.76 0.76 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.82 0.82 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.63 0.81 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 196 282 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement -------- (pcph) ------ (pcph) ------ (pcph)(sec/veh) ------------- (veh) ------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- NB L 19 196 > NB T 1 257 > 238 16.9 0.3 C 16.9 NB R 5 1160 > SB L 62 282 > 282 16.5 0.9 C SB T 2 296 > 8.9 SB R 172 769 6.0 0.9 B EB L 170 843 5.3 0.8 B 2.6 WB L 9 1410 2.6 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 2.7 sec/veh i HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d SWIFTAM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Farrell Street (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ....... ........... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 1997 AM DHV w/ Project Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (�) SU/RV's (%) CV's (�) PCE's ------------ Eastbound L T R ---- ---- 0 > 1 < 0 N 171 130 511 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 Westbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 N 9 371 287 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 ---------------- Northbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 19 1 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Southbound L T R 0 > 1 1 62 2 175 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d SWIFTAM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 156 514 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1154 760 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1154 760 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.77 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 181 658 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1406 833 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1406 833 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.79 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.77 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 994 876 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 328 379 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.76 0.76 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 250 289 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 938 853 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 303 340 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.76 0.76 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.81 0.81 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.63 0.81 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 190 276. HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d SWIFTAM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement -------- (pcph) ------ (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) ------ ------ -------------- (veh) ----- (sec/veh) --------- NB L 19 190 > NB T 1 250 > 231 17.5 0.3 C 17.5 NB R 5 1154 > SB L 62 276 > 276 16.9 0.9 C SB T 2 289 > 9.0 SB R 175 760 6.1 1.0 B EB L 171 833 5.4 0.8 B 2.6 WB L 9 1406 2.6 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 2.8 sec/veh 1 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTAM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. Morse Drive zex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Streets: (N-S) Farrell Street (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 2002 AM DHV Background Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCIs (�) SU/RV I s CVIs (�) PCEIs ------------ 0 > 1 < 0 N 183 137 55 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 --------------- 0 > 1 < 0 N 10 389 310 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 ---------------- 0 > 1 < 0 21 1 5' 1 1 1! 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 > 1 1 67 2 185 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTAM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 164 544 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1143 734 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1143 734 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.75 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 192 699 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1389 796 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1389 796 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.77 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.74 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1056 929 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 305 355 Capacity Adjustment Factor Aue to Impeding Movements 0.73 0.73 ovement Capacity: (pcph) 223 260 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 995 904 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 281 317 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.73 0.73 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.79 0.79 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.59 0.79 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 166 249 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTAM.HCO Page 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement -------- (pcph) ------ (pcph) ------ (pcph)(sec/veh) ------------- (veh) ------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- NB L 21 166 > NB T 1 223 > 199 20.9 0.4 D 20.9 NB R 5 1143 > SB L 67 249 > 249 19.9 1.1 C SB T 2 260 > 10.2 SB R 185 734 6.5 1.1 B EB L 183 796 5.9 1.0 B 2.9 WB L 10 1389 2.6 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 3.1 sec/veh I 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d SWIFTAM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Farrell Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 ---------------------- (E-W) Swift Street Other Information ......... 2002 AM DHV w/ Project Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R __J No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's ------------ 0 > 1 < 0 N 184 140 55 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 0 > 1 < 0 N 10 400 310 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 ---------------- Northbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 21 1 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 --------------- Adjustment Factors --------------- --------------- Southbound L T R 0 > 1 1 67 2 188 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 --------------- 1.00 1.00 Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d SWIFTAM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 9 5 % Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement -------- (pcph) ------ (pcph) ------ (pcph)(sec/veh) ------------- (veh) ------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- NB L 21 160 > NB T 1 217 > 193 21.7 0.4 D 21.7 NB R 5 1138 > SB L 67 243 > 243 20.6 1.1 D SB T 2 254 > 10.4 SB R 188 725 6.7 1.1 B EB L 184 787 6.0 1.0 B 2.9 WB L 10 1384 2.6 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 3.2 sec/veh 1 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 4 Morse Drive sex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Farrell Street (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst....... .......... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 1997 PM DHV Background Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R __J No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (�) SU/RV's (�) CV's (�) PCE's ------------ 0 > 1 < 0 N 117 280 23 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 --------------- 0 > 1 < 0 N 1 234 106 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 ---------------- 0 > 1 < 0 41 5 8 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 > 1 1 204 3 271 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection - -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 292 287 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 985 991 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 985 991 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.73 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 303 340 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1229 1181 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1229 1181 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.90 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.88 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 750 708 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 441 464 Capacity Adjustment Factor Aue to Impeding Movements 0.88 0.88 vement Capacity: (pcph) 387 408 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 834 703 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 348 415 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.87 0.87 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.90 0.90 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.66 0.89 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 228 370 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement -------- (pcph) ------ (pcph) ------ (pcph)(sec/veh) ------------- (veh) ------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- NB L 41 228 > NB T 5 387 > 269 16.7 0.7 C 16.7 NB R 8 985 > SB L 204 370 > 371 21.3 3.2 D SB T 3 408 > 12.0 SB R 271 991 5.0 1.2 A EB L 117 1181 3.4 0.3 A 0.9 WB L 1 1229 2.9 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 5.5 sec/veh 1 ) HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d SWIFTPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Farrell Street (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 1997 PM DHV w/Project Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's ------------ 0 > 1 < 0 N 125 296 23 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 --------------- 0 > 1 < 0 N 1 236 106 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 ---------------- 0 > 1 < 0 41 5 8 1 1 1 0 0 0 0, 1 0 1' 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 > 1 1 204 3 276 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d SWIFTPM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 308 289 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 967 988 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 967 988 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 0.72 Step 2: LT from Major Street -------------------------------------------------------- WB EB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 319 342 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1208 1178 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1208 1178 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.89 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 1.00 0.87 Step 3: TH from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 776 734 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 427 449 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.87 0.87 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 371 390 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 0.99 Step 4: LT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 862 729 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 335 401 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.86 0.86 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.89 0.89 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.64 0.88 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 216 354. HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d SWIFTPM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement -------- (pcph) ------ (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) ------ -------------------- (veh) ----- (sec/veh) --------- NB L 41 216 > NB T 5 371 > 255 17.9 0.8 C 17.9 NB R 8 967 > SB L 204 354 > 354 23.5 3.4 D SB T 3 390 > 13.0 SB R 276 988 5.1 1.3 B EB L 125 1178 3.4 0.3 A 1.0 WB L 1 1208 3.0 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 5.8 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. ?" Morse Drive . sex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Farrell Street (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 2002 PM DHV Background Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (�) SU/RV's (�) CV's ($) PCE's ------------ 0 > 1 < 0 N 127 303 25 1 1 1 0 0 0 1.00 --------------- 0 > 1 < 0 N 1 252 114 1 1 1 0 0 0 1.00 ---------------- 0 > 1 < 0 44 5 9I 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 > 1 1 220 4 293 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection ------------------------------------------------------ Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 316 309 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 958 966 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 958 966 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.70 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 328 366 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1196 1147 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1196 1147 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.89 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.86 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 810 765 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 410 433 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.86 0.86 Cement Capacity: (pcph) 353 373 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 901 760 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 318 384 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.85 0.85 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.89 0.88 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.62 0.88 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 196 337 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement -------- (pcph) ------ (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) ------ ------ -------------- (veh) ----- (sec/veh) --------- NB L 44 196 > NB T 5 353 > 234 20.4 1.0 D 20.4 NB R 9 958 > SB L 220 337 > 338 29.3 4.2 D SB T 4 373 > 15.7 SB R 293 966 5.3 1.4 B EB L 127 1147 3.5 0.3 A 1.0 WB L 1 1196 3.0 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 7.0 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d SWIFTPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 ----------------------- Streets: (N-S) Farrell Street (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 2002 PM DHV w/Project Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCI (%) SU/RV' s ( o ) CV' s ( o ) PCE's ------------ 0 > 1 < 0 N 135 319 25 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 --------------- 0 > 1 < 0 N 1 254 114 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 ---------------- 0 > 1 < 0 44 5 9 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 > 1 1 220 4 298 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d SWIFTPM.HCO Page 2 Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 332 311 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 940 963 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 940 963 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 0.69 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 344 368 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1175 1145 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1175 1145 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.88 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 1.00 0.85 Step 3: TH from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 836 791 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 397 419 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.85 0.85 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 338 357 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 0.99 Step 4: LT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 930 786 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 306 371 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.84 0.84 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.88 0.88 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.61 0.87 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 186 32.2 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1d SWIFTPM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 950 Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph) (sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- NB L ------ 44 ------ ------ 186 > -------------- ----- --------- NB T 5 338 > 222 21.9 1.0 D 21.9 NB R 9 940 > SB L 220 322 > 323 32.9 4.5 E SB T 4 357 > 17.2 SB R 298 963 5.4 1.5 B EB L 135 1145 3.6 0.4 A 1.0 WB L 1 1175 3.1 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 7.5 sec/veh ATTACHMENT C Signal Warrant Analyses LAMOUREUX, STONE & O'LEARY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 MORSE DRIVE ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 INTERSECTION SIGNAL WARRANT EVAL UATION INTERSECTION: Swift Street PUD PROJECT #: 97037 TOWN: South Burlington BY: J. Carriere COUNT DATE: 3/19&20/97 DATE: 03/27/97 SCENARIO: 2002 Background INPUT OBSERVED VOLUMES: HOUR EASTBOUND I WESTBOUND I NORTHBOUND I SOUTHBOUND BEGIN LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT I LT TH RT TOT 0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0700 128 100 46 274 5 246 201 452 II 1 2 14 55 3 116 174 0800 120 98 16 234 4 238 158 400 18 0 3 21 47 3 109 159 0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1400 72 137 14 223 4 106 54 164 9 2 3 14 59 2 76 137 1500 93 157 20 270 1 168 32 251 28 5 4 37 89 3 156 248 1600 83 219 21 323 2 194 91 287 23 3 5 31 127 2 184 313 1700 113 237 5 355 0 161 86 247 20 3 4 27 194 2 233 429 1800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MAJOR STREET (E/W or N/S)? EJW NUMBER OF LANES EACH APPROACH MAJOR STREET? 1 (EXCLUDING TURN LANES) MINOR STREET? I (HIGHER VOLUME APPROACH) DOES HIGHER VOLUME MINOR APPROACH HAVE AN EXCLUSIVE (IF YES, SUBTRACT ONE LANE FROM RT LANE (Y or N)? Y HIGHER VOLUME MINOR APPROACH) POSTED SPEED LIMIT? 35 EST. 85-PERCENTILE SPEED? 40 MONTHLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR = 1.05 (AAWDT BASE) MAJOR ST. GROWTH FACTOR = 1.08 TO: 2002 MINOR ST. GROWTH FACTOR = 1.08 TO: 2002 LAMOUREUX, STONE & O'LEARY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 MORSE DRIVE ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 INTERSECTION SIGNAL WARRANT EVALUATION INPUT ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT VOLUMES: HOUR EASTBOUND I WESTBOUND I NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND BEGIN LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT I LT TH RT TOT I LT TH RT TOT 0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ADJUSTED AVERAGE WEEKDAY VOLUMES: HOUR EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND BEGIN LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT 0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0700 145 113 52 310 6 279 228 513 12 1 0 13 62 3 0 65 0800 136 111 18 265 5 270 179 454 20 0 0 20 53 3 0 56 0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1400 82 155 16 253 5 120 61 186 10 2 0 12 67 2 0 69 1500 105 178 23 306 1 191 93 285 32 6 0 38 101 3 0 104 1600 94 248 24 366 2 220 103 325 26 3 0 29 144 2 0 146 1700 128 269 6 403 0 183 98 281 23 3 0 26 220 2 0 222 1800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LAMOUREUX, STONE & O'LEARY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 MORSE DRIVE ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 INTERSECTION SIGNAL WARRANT EVAL UATION TOTAL HIGHER ------ ----- WARRANT ---- ----- MAJOR MINOR THRESHOLDS: 1 2 8 9 11 HOUR STREET APPROACH MAJOR STREET 500 750 600 SEE LOOKUP BEGIN VOLUME VOLUME MINOR STREET 150 75 120 TABLES 0600 0 0 N N N N N 0700 823 .65 N N N N N 0800 719 56 N N N N N 0900 0 0 N N N N N 1000 0 0 N N N N N 1100 0 0 N N N N N 1200 0 0 N N N N N 1300 0 0 N N N N N 1400 439 69 N N N N N 1500 591 104 N N N N N 1600 691 146 N N Y N N 1700 684 222 Y N Y Y N 1800 0 0 N N N N N 1900 0 0 N N N N N N>=8? N>=8? N>=8? N>=4? N--I? NO NO NO NO NO n?ot, '� of ? R:\1997\97037\SIGWARAA/f LAMOUREUX, STONE & O'LEARY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 MORSE DRIVE ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 INTERSECTION SIGNAL WARRANT EVAL UATION INTERSECTION: Swift Succt P1J1.) PROJECT #: 97037 TOWN: South Burlington BY: J. Catriere COUNT DATE: 3,' 19&20; 97 DATE: 04/03, 97 SCENARIO: 2002 w.'Projcct INPUT OBSERVED VOLUMES: HOUR EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND BEGIN LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT 0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0700 128 100 46 274 5 246 201 452 11 1 2 14 55 3 116 174 0800 120 98 16 234 4 238 158 400 18 0 3 21 47 3 109 159 0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1400 72 137 14 223 4 106 54 164 9 2 3 14 59 2 76 137 1500 93 157 20 270 1 168 82 251 28 5 4 37 89 3 156 248 1600 83 219 21 323 2 194 91 287 23 3 5 31 127 2 184 313 1700 113 '237 5 355 0 161 86 247 20 3 4 27 194 2 223 42S 1800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MAJOR STREET (FJW or NIS)? NUMBER OF LANES EACH APPROACH MAJOR STREET? MINOR STREET? DOES HIGHER VOLUME MINOR APPROACH HAVE AN EXCLUSIVE RT LANE (Y or N)? POSTED SPEED LIMIT. EST. 85-PERCENTILE SPEED? MONTHLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR = MAJOR ST. GROWTH FACTOR = MINOR ST. GROWTH FACTOR = EW 1 (EXCLUDING TURN LANES) 1 (HIGHER VOLUME APPROACH) (IF YES, SUBTRACT ONE LANE FROM Y HIGHER VOLUME MINOR APPROACH) 35 40 1.05 (AAWDTBASE) L08 TO: 2002 1.08 TO: 2002 Paqe 1 of 3 Q:\1997\97037\SlGWAR-Wl LAMOUREUX, STONE & O'LEARY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 MORSE DRIVE ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 INTERSECTION SIGNAL WARRANT EVAL UATION INPUT ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT VOLUMES: HOUR EASTBOUND I WESTBOUND I NORTHBOUND I SOUTHBOUND BEGIN LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT 0600 0 0 0 0 0 1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0700 2 4 0 6 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0800 0 6 0 6 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1400 6 9 0 15 0 911 0 911 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 1500 12 10 0 22 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 1600 7 12 0 19 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 1700 8 11 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 1800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ADJUSTED AVERAGE WEEKDAY VOLUMES: HOUR EASTBOUND I WESTBOUND 1 NORTHBOUND I SOUTHBOUND BEGIN LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT 0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0700 147 117 52 316 6 288 228 522 12 1 0 13 62 3 0 65 0800 136 117 18 271 5 278 179 462 20 0 0 20 53 3 0 56 0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1400 88 164 16 268 5 1031 61 1097 10 2 0 12 67 2 0 69 1500 117 188 23 328 1 193 93 287 32 6 0 38 101 3 0 104 1600 101 260 24 385 2 225 103 330 26 3 0 29 144 2 0 146 1700 136 280 6 422 0 183 98 281 23 3 0 26 220 2 0 222 1800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 2 of 3 - Q:\1997\97037\SIGWAR.WI 1 ) LAMOUREUX, STONE & O'LEARY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 MORSE DRIVE ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 INTERSECTION SIGNAL WARRANT EVAL UATION TOTAL HIGHER WARRANT MAJOR MINOR THRESHOLDS: 1 2 8 9 11 HOUR STREET APPROACH MAJOR STREET 500 750 600 SEE LOOKUP BEGIN VOLUME VOLUME MINOR STREET I50 75 120 TABLES 0600 0 0 N N N N N 0700 838 65 N N N N N 0800 733 56 N N N N N 0900 0 0 N N N N N 1000 0 0 N N N N N 1100 0 0 N N N N N 1200 0 0 N N N N N 1300 0 0 N N N N N 1400 1365 69 N N N N N 1500 615 104 N N N N N 1600 715 146 N N Y N N 1700 703 222 Y N Y Y N 1800 0 0 N N N N N 1900 0 0 N N N N N N5=8? 1,>=8? N>=8? N>=4? N-I? NO NO NO NO NO Page 3 of 3 Q:\1997\97037\SIGWAR.W '.1MOUREUX, STONE & O'LEA.. 1' Consulting Engineers and Land Surveyors 14 Morse Drive Essex )unction, Vermont 05452 April 7, 1997 Mr. Dan Morrissey Wright & Morrissey, Inc. P.O. Box 421 Burlington, VT 05402 RE: Proposed Swift Street PUD South Burlington, Vermont Dear Dan: APR - 7 1997 (802) 878-4450 Fax (802) 878-3135 As requested, we have prepared a traffic impact evaluation assessing the potential traffic congestion and safety impacts of the above -referenced project. The following presents the sources of background traffic data, an explanation of the study methodology, the results of the analyses, our conclusions and our recommendations. Project Data This project is a proposed planned unit development (PUD) involving three existing lots located at #57, #69 and #85 Swift Street in South Burlington. All three lots are located on the south side of Swift Street between Shelburne Road and Farrell Street, and are presently built upon with a mixture of residential and commercial uses. The project will retain the existing mini -storage facility located at the westerly edge of the PUD on the St. Armand parcel (#57 Swift Street) and the Vermont Gas office building to the east located at #85 Swift Street. Between those two existing uses, the two existing residential buildings will be demolished, and a new bank / office building constructed in their place. Of the four existing curb cuts serving #57 and #69 Swift Street, only the one located adjacent to the westerly property line of this project will be retained in order to provide access to the mini - storage facility. The proposed bank / office building will be served by a new curb cut located approximately 180 feet from the westerly property line. The existing driveway serving Vermont Gas will remain unchanged. Civil, Environmental & Transportation Engineering • Hydrogeological Investigation • Planning • Land Surveying Mr. Dan Morrissey April 7, 1997 Page 2 Background Traffic Volumes As requested by Joe Weith, South Burlington City Planner, included in this study are the Shelburne Road / Swift Street, Swift Street / Project Access and the Swift Street / Farrell Street intersections. Turning movement patterns at the two existing intersections (Shelburne Road and Farrell Street) are based on counts conducted by this office on March 13, 19 and 20, 1997. Copies of those counts are enclosed as Attachment A. Traffic volumes from those counts were factored to design hourly volumes (DHV's) on Swift Street using data from the Vermont Agency of Transportation's nearby Continuous Traffic Count Station D099 located on 1-189. Urban area growth rates, also compiled by the VAOT based on historical data, were then used to estimate 1997 and 2002 DHV's. These two years represent the anticipated commencement of construction and a five-year projection thereof. Those volumes were used in the following analyses to represent "background" conditions. Project -Generated Traffic The proposed 41,250 square foot office building will include 675 sq. ft. for a drive-in bank and 40,575 sq. ft. of office space (to be used for banking purposes). An estimate of the additional traffic which will be generated by this building was calculated using trip generation data published by the ITE' for land -use categories #912 - Drive-in Bank and #710 - General Office Building. Table 1 presents the resulting vehicular trip generation estimates. Table 1 Estimated Vehicular Trip Generation Use Average Weekday (vte/day) A.M. Peak Hour (vte/hour) P.M. Peak Hour (vte/hour) Enter Exit Total Enter FE7xitTotal Drive-in Bank 388 5 4 9 14 15 29 General Office 710 85 10 95 16 80 96 Total 11098 90 14 104 1 30 1 95 125 "Trip Generation, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 5th Edition (1991) and 5th Edition Update (1995)" Mr. Dan Morrissey April 7, 1997 Page 3 Anticipated turning movement patterns at the project access are based on turning patterns of traffic observed by this office at Vermont Gas in the aforementioned traffic counts. Traffic Congestion The potential traffic congestion impacts of this project were determined by performing intersection capacity analyses at the proposed Project Access intersection onto Swift Street as well as the Shelburne Road / Swift Street and Swift Street / Farrell Street intersections. Analyses for the Project Access intersection were performed for the two "with project" design year scenarios. Because this intersection will not exist without this project, no analyses of background "without project" conditions are possible. Both a.m. and p.m. peak hour periods were analyzed. The Shelburne Road and Farrell Street intersections were analyzed for background and with -project scenarios during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour periods for both 1997 and 2002 design years. Procedures used to perform the capacity analyses were obtained from the Highway Capacity ManuaF (HCM). The HCM uses " level of service" to define differing levels of traffic congestion. There are six levels of service, ranging from A to F. The criteria for intersection levels of service are shown in Table 2. Table 2 Intersection Level of Service Criteria Level of Service Average Delay (sec/veh) Expected Traffic Delay Signalized Unsignalized A 15 <5 Little or no delay B <15 S10 Short traffic delays C <25 s20 Average traffic delays D <40 s30 Long traffic delays E <60 s45 Very long traffic delays F >60 >45 Failure - extreme congestion 2 "Highway Capacity Manual - Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, 1994" Mr. Dan Morrissey April 7, 1997 Page 4 In urban areas, which includes the City of South Burlington, accepted engineering practice has been to maintain a minimum level of service D at signalized intersections. On a case by case basis, that can be lowered to level of service E in accordance with VAOT design policy'. At unsignalized intersections, the minor approach movements, particularly left -turns, typically experience lower levels of service due to their having to yield to other traffic. Consequently, traffic congestion conditions encountered by private driveways located on high -volume collectors and arterials can easily experience levels of service E and F. This is also caused, in part, by the differing delay criteria for unsignalized and signalized intersections, which is explained best by the following excerpt from the HCM: "The primary reason for this difference is that drivers expect different levels of performance from different kinds of transportation facilities. The expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher traffic volumes than an unsignalized intersection. Additionally, several driver behavior considerations combine to make delays at signalized intersections less onerous than at unsignalized intersections. For example, drivers at signalized intersections are able to relax during the red interval, whereas drivers on the minor approaches to unsignalized intersections must remain attentive to the task of identifying acceptable gaps and vehicle conflicts. Also, there is much more variability in the amount of delay experienced by individual drivers at unsignalized than at signalized intersections. For these reasons, it is considered that the total delay threshold for any given level of service is less for an unsignalized intersection than for a signalized intersection." Tables 3-5 present the levels of service and corresponding vehicular delays (seconds per vehicle) for each of the intersections included in this study. For traffic congestion conditions, the p.m. peak hour time period was found to control, due to the higher volumes of adjacent street traffic combined with higher volumes of exiting project -generated traffic. The results indicate that acceptable levels of service will be maintained with this project through the year 2002. A copy of the level of service calculations are enclosed as Attachment A. Traffic Safety Traffic safety conditions are influenced by many factors, including road width, pavement conditions, sight distances, lighting, proper signing and pavement markings, speed limits, alignment, number and spacing of driveways, etc. The following discusses several of the more important factors with respect to existing and proposed conditions at the proposed project access intersection. "Highway Design "Level of Service" Policy, Vermont Agency of Transportation, July 25, 1996" Mr. Dan Morrissey April 7, 1997 Page 5 Table 3 Swift Street / Proposed Project Access DHV's w/ Project A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour 1997 2002 1997 2002 Project Access NB All C (11.1) C (12.2) C (15.1) C (17.3) Swift Street WB LT A (3.4) A (3.5) A (3.4) A (3.6) OVERALL A (0.2) A (0.2) A (1.3) A (1.4) Table 4 Shelburne Road / Swift Street Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour 1997 DHV's Background w/ Project Background w/ Project Shelburne Road SB T A (3.6) A (3.6) A (3.6) A (3.6) SB LT C (21.4) D (28.9) D (36.8) E (42.7) Swift Street WB RT B (10.4) B (10.5) C (15.1) C (16.2) WB LT C (18.3) C (18.5) D (26.5) D (30.8) Shelburne Road NB T/TR B (9.5) B (9.7) B (12.9) B (13.0) OVERALL B (8.3) B (9.0) B (11.7) B (12.6) A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour 2002 DHV's Background w/ Project Background w/ Project Shelburne Road SB T A (4.0) A (4.0) A (3.9) A (3.9) SB LT C (23.3) D (34.1) E (44.8) E (54.0) Swift Street WB RT B (10.8) B (10.9) C (15.7) C (17.0) WB LT C (19.2) C (19.5) D (28.9) D (35.3) Shelburne Road NB T/TR B (10.3) B (10.6) C (15.9) C (16.3) OVERALL B (9.0) B (9.9) B (13.9) B (15.1) Mr. Dan Morrissey April 7, 1997 Page 6 Table 5 Swift Street / Farrell Street Intersection A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour 1997 DHV's Background w/ Project Background w/ Project VT Gas Driveway NB ALL C (16.9) C (17.5) C (16.7) C (17.7) Farrell Street SB LT/T C (16.5) C (16.9) D (21.3) D (23.4) SB RT B (6.0) B (6.1) A (5.0) B (5.0) Swift Street EB LT B (5.3) B (5.4) A (3.4) A (3.4) WB LT A (2.6) A (2.6) A (2.9) A (3.0) OVERALL A (2.7) A (2.8) B (5.5) B (5.8) A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour 2002 DHV's Background w/ Project Background w/ Project VT Gas Driveway NB ALL D (20.9) D (21.7) D (20.4) D (21.7) Farrell Street SB LT/T C (19.9) D (20.5) D (29.3) E (32.4) SB RT B (6.5) B (6.7) B (5.3) B (5.4) Swift Street EB LT B (5.9) B (6.0) A (3.5) A (3.6) WB LT A (2.6) A (2.6) A (3.0) A (3.1) OVERALL A (3.1) A (3.2) B (7.0) B (7.4) Swift Street is presently posted at 35 mph in the immediate vicinity of this project. At that speed, it is recommended that intersections have 385 feet of available sight distance in both directions from the minor street (new project access) approach in order to maintain good traffic flow and traffic safety conditions°. In no case, should the available intersection sight distance be less than the minimum safe stopping sight distance, which at 35 mph equals 250 feet. 4 "Intersection Sight Distance, NCHRP Report 383, Transportation Research Board, 1996" Mr. Dan Morrissey April 7, 1997 Page 7 To the west from the location of the proposed Project Access intersection, the available intersection sight distance is limited by a crest on Swift Street. Presently, 385 feet of sight distance is available as measured from an eye height of 3.5 feet at the project access to an oncoming vehicle height of 3.5 feet. To the east, the available intersection sight distance exceeds 1,000 feet. At 385 feet of available sight distance, an oncoming vehicle traveling at 35 mph is visible for 7.5 seconds before reaching the intersection. Observation at the proposed project access indicated that oncoming vehicles (from the west) were visible for approximately 10 seconds. This is due to the fact that vehicles have just turned onto Swift Street from Shelburne Road and therefore are not driving 35 mph the whole distance. In conclusion, the available sight distance is more than adequate in both directions based on the average speed of oncoming vehicles. Site grading should be designed however, to enhance the existing sight lines and to provide room for snow storage adjacent to Swift Street such that snowbanks to do not restrict the sight lines during winter months. Signal Warrants A signal warrant evaluation was conducted at the Swift Street / Farrell Street intersection to determine if traffic volumes with this proposed development would warrant a signal at this intersection. In this analyses, the observed March 19th and 20th 7:00 -9:00 a.m. and 2:00 - 6:00 p.m. traffic volumes were adjusted to average weekday volumes using AOT monthly adjustment factors. They were then factored upward to reflect year 2002 volumes using ACT growth factors, and project -generated traffic added. The five volume -related warn -ants ( #1 - Minimum Vehicular Volume, #2 - Interruption of Continuous Traffic, #8 - Combination of Warrants 1 and 2, #9 - Four Hour Volumes, and #11 - Peak Hour Volume) were then analyzed. The results of the analyses indicate that the warrants will not be met with this project through the year 2002. Detailed results of these analyses can be found in Appendix B. Conclusions This evaluation has determined the potential traffic congestion and safety impacts resulting from a proposed office building and PUD to be located at #57, 69 and 85 Swift Street in South Burlington, Vermont. The following outlines our conclusions relating to background traffic congestion and safety conditions, and this project's potential impacts upon those conditions. With respect to traffic congestion, the results of the intersection capacity analyses indicate that this project will not create any significant traffic impacts, and that acceptable levels of service will be experienced during future design hour conditions at all intersections included in this study. Mr. Dan Morrissey April 7, 1997 Page 8 Similarly, it is not anticipated that this project will create adverse impacts with respect to existing traffic safety conditions in the immediate vicinity of this project. It is recommended that proper pavement markings, traffic signage and street lighting be provided at the proposed project access intersection, and that those items be shown on the proposed site plans for this project. The site grading should also be designed to enhance available intersection sight lines from the proposed Project Access. Lastly, evaluation of future average weekday traffic volumes at the Swift Street / Farrell Street intersection indicated that a signal will not be warranted at that intersection through the year 2002. We thank you for this opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions concerning the above or if we may be of additional assistance, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, , � ;�' G�� Jody Carriere, E.I. Rog Dickinson, P.E. Q :\1997\97037\97037TRA. R PT ATTACHMENT A Level of Service Analyses HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c PUDPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Project Access (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 1997 AM DHV w/Project Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCIs (%) SU/RV's (�) CVIs (%) ----------- Eastbound L T R 0 1 < 0 N 348 76 1 1 0 Westbound L T R 0 > 1 0 N 14 551 1 1 4 0 1 0 1.42 ---------------- Northbound L T R 0 > 0 < 0 11 3' 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1_0000 ------1 _ _- Adjustment Factors Southbound L T R 0 0 0 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c PUDPM.HCO Page 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 386 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 883 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 883 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB ------------------------------------------------------=- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 424 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1077 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1077 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.98 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 951 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 298 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.97 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.97 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.97 Movement Capacity: -------------------------------------------------------- (pcph) 290 Flow Rate Movement (pcph) -------- ------ NB L 11 NB R 3 WB L 20 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Move Shared Total Queue Approach Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay (pcph) ------ (pcph)(sec/veh) ------------- (veh) ------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- 290 > 339 11.1 0.0 C 11.1 883 > 1077 3.4 0.0 A 0.1 Intersection Delay = 0.2 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c PUDPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Project Access (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 2002 AM DHV w/Project Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCIs M SU/RV's (�) CVIs M PCE's ------------ 0 1 < 0 N 375 76 1 1 0 0 > 1 0 N 14 595 1 1 4 0 1 0 1.42 ---------------- 0 > 0 < 0 11 3 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1.00 ---------------- 1.00 Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c PUDPM.HCO ----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 413 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 855 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 855 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB ------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 451 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1045 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1045 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.98 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1022 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 271 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.97 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.97 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.97 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 263 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement -------- (pcph) ------ (pcph) ------ (pcph)(sec/veh) ------------- (veh) ------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- NB L 11 263 > 309 12.2 0.0 C 12.2 NB R 3 855 > WB L 20 1045 3.5 0.0 A 0.1 Intersection Delay = 0.2 sec/veh Page 2 I i HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c PUDPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Project Access (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 1997 PM DHV w/Project Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's ------------ 0 1 < 0 N 420 25 1 1 0 0 > 1 0 N 5 546 1 1 4 0 1 0 1.42 ---------------- 0 > 0 < 0 73 22 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c PUDPM.HCO ----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 432 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 836 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 836 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 445 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1052 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1052 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 984 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 285 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 282 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) -------- ------ ------ -------------------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- NB L 73 282 > 333 15.1 1.2 C 15.1 NB R 22 836 > WB L 7 1052 3.4 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 1.3 sec/veh Page 2 1 I HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c PUDPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Project Access (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 2002 PM DHV w/Project Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCIs (%) SU/RV's (%) CVIs (%) PCEIs ------------ 0 1 < 0 N 455 25 1 1 0 0 > 1 0 N 5 589 1 1 4 0 1 0 1.42 ---------------- 0 > 0 < 0 73 22 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c PUDPM.HCO Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 468 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 802 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 802 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.97 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB AB ------------------------------------------------------=- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 480 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1012 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1012 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 Step 4: LT from Minor Street -------------------------------------------------------- NB SB Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1062 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 257 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.99 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.99 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.99 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 254 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) -------- ------ ------ -------------------- ----- (sec/veh) NB L 73 254 > --------- 302 17.3 1.3 C 17.3 NB R 22 802 > WB L 7 1012 3.6 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 1.4 sec/veh Page 2 Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 1997 DHV AM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 0 1 1562 0.0 24.0 0 0.0 0 04/01/97 08:53:24 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES -------------------- \ 340 12.0 1 -- 0 0.0 0 ------------------- / 211 12.0 1 North / ------------- 1423 143 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 36.0 I 0.0 PERMSV N N N N 3 I 0 I OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- N 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 0.90 1.00 1.00 0- N N Y 3 3 3 E 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 1.00 0.90 1.00 0- Y N Y 3 3 3 S 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 NO 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 W 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 0.90 0.90 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 1 Phase 6 1 LD/** ------------------------------------------------------------------------- + * ^ I + + * ++++� + ++++I + *> + v v v North * *>� * * * * ------------------------ G/C=0.143 - G/C=0.457 ------------------------------------------------ G/C=0.171 G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.000 G/C=0.000 G= 10.0" G= 32.0" G= 12.0" G= 0.0" G= 0.0" G= 0.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 6.0" I Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=21.4% OFF=75.7% I OFF= 0.0% OFF= 0.0% OFF= 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------- C= 70 sec G= 54.0 sec = 77.1% Y=16.0 sec = 22.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 1997 DHV AM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT -- vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- N-RT 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 N-TH 1562 1.00 1562 TH 1562 2 1.05 1640 0.00 0.00 N-LT 197 1.00 197 LT 197 1 1.00 197 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E-RT 340 1.00 340 RT 340 1 1.00 340 0.00 1.00 E-TH 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 E-LT 211 1.00 211 LT 211 1 1.00 211 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S-TR 143 1.00 143 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 S-TH 1423 1.00 1423 TH+TR 1566 3 1.26 1973 0.00 0.09 S-LT ------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet 04/01/97 08:53:24 Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of -------------------------------------------------- Sat- ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 0.967 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1728 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E- RT 1900 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.850 1.000 1.00 1615 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1787 S- TH+TR 1900 3 1.000 0.973 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.986 1.000 1.00 5473 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- -- -- vph vphg -- - vph N- TH 1640 3725 0.440 0.714 2661 0.616 N- LT Pri. 197 1728 0.114 0.171 296 0.666 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E- RT 340 1615 0.211 0.414 669 0.508 E- LT Pri. 211 1787 0.118 0.200 357 0.591 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S- TH+TR 1973 5473 0.361 0.500 2736 0.721 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Cycle Length, C 70 sec Sum(v/s) = 0.593 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = 0.680 Swift Street PUD 97037 04/01/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 08:53:24 1997 DHV AM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Level -of -Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C dl DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - N- TH 0.616 .714 3.9 0.85 2661 16 0.32 3.6 A N- LT 0.666 .171 20.6 0.85 296 16 3.83 21.4 C ------------------------------------------------------------------> 5.5 B+ E- RT 0.508 .414 11.6 0.85 669 16 0.55 10.4 B E- LT 0.591 .200 19.3 0.85 357 16 1.89 18.3 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 13.4 B S- TH+TR 0.721 .500 10.4 0.85 2736 16 0.67 9.5 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 9.5 B+ Cycle= 7011 Int Total 0.656________________________________________________> 8.3 B+ Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 1997 DHV AM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.66 Vehicle Delay ------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 LD/** ------------------------------------- + * I + A i 1 + * ++++i I ++++1 /I� I + *> I + v v North I 04/01/97 08:53:24 8.3 Level of Service B+ * *>I v ** ** ------------------------------------- 1 G/C=0.143 I G/C=0.457 I G/C=0.171 1 G= 10.0" I G= 32.0" I G= 12.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 6.0" l Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=21.4% 1 OFF=75.7% 1 ------------------------------------- C= 70 sec G= 54.0 sec = 77.1% Y=16.0 sec = 22.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Width/ g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxl Group Lanesl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reqd Used I ®C (vph) ®E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I N Approach 5.5 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I TH 1 24/2 10.450 10.714 1 2661 1 2661 1 1640 10.616 1 3.6 1 A 1 231 ft1 I LT 1 11/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.155 10.171 1 224 1 296 1 197 10.666 1 21.4 I*C 1 160 ft1 S Approach 9.5 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I TH+TRI 36/3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.370 10.500 1 2736 1 2736 1 1973 10.721 1 9.5 I*B+l 325 ft1 E Approach 13.4 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I RT 1 12/1 10.254 10.414 1 613 1 669 1 340 10.508 1 10.4 1 B 1 194 ft1 I LT 1 12/1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.159 10.200 1 283 1 357 1 211 10.591 1 18.3 I*C+1 165 ft1 Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 1997 DHV AM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 0 1562 0.0 124.0 241 11.0 1 \ \ 0 0.0 0 04/03/97 13:11:15 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES -------------------- \ 347 12.0 1 ---------- --------- -- 0 0.0 0 ------------------- / 215 12.0 1 North /------------- 1423 I 175 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 36.0 I 0.0 PERMSV N N N N 3 I 0 OVERLP Y Y Y Y I I LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 0.90 1.00 1.00 0- N N Y 3 3 3 E 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 1.00 0.90 1.00 0- Y N Y 3 3 3 S 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 NO 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 W ---- 0.0 ----- 2.0 -------------- 2.0 2.0 NO ------- 0 0 --- 0.90 -------------- 0.90 0.90 0- -------- N -------- N N 3 -------- 3 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 1 Phase 6 1 LD/** ------------------------------------------------------------------------- + * I + + * ++++ + I ++++ /I\ I + *> + v v A I **** v North * *>I * * I I * * ----------- G/C=0.143 ----------------------------------------------------- G/C=0.457 G/C=0.171 G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.000 G= 10.0" G= 32.0" G= 12.0" G= 0.0" G= 0.0" G= 0.0" Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 6.0" I Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0" OFF= ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0.0% I OFF=21.4% OFF=75.7% I OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 0.0% C= 70 sec G= 54.0 sec = 77.1% Y=16.0 sec = 22.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Swift Street PUD 97037 04/03/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 13:11:15 1997 DHV AM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ N-RT 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 N-TH 1562 1.00 1562 TH 1562 2 1.05 '1640 0.00 0.00 N-LT 241 1.00 241 LT 241 1 1.00 241 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E-RT 347 1.00 347 RT 347 1 1.00 347 0.00 1.00 E-TH 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 E-LT 215 1.00 215 LT 215 1 1.00 215 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S-TR 175 1.00 175 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 S-TH 1423 1.00 1423 TH+TR 1598 3 1.26 2013 0.00 0.11 S-LT ------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of -------------------------------------------------- Sat- ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 0.967 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1728 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E- RT 1900 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.850 1.000 1.00 1615 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1787 S- TH+TR 1900 3 1.000 0.974 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.984 1.000 1.00 5460 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- -- -- vph vphg -- - vph N- TH 1640 3725 0.440 0.714 2661 0.616 N- LT Pri. 241 1728 0.140 0.171 296 0.814 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E- RT 347 1615 0.215 0.414 669 0.519 E- LT Pri. 215 1787 0.120 0.200 357 0.602 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S- TH+TR 2013 5460 0.369 0.500 2730 0.737 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Cycle Length, C 70 sec Sum(v/s) = 0.628 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = 0.721 Swift Street PUD 97037 04/03/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 13:11:15 1997 DHV AM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Level -of -Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C dl DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - N- TH 0.616 .714 3.9 0.85 2661 16 0.32 3.6 A N- LT 0.814 .171 21.2 0.85 296 16 10.83 28.9 D+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 6.8 B+ E- RT 0.519 .414 11.6 0.85 669 16 0.59 10.5 B E- LT 0.602 .200 19.4 0.85 357 16 2.05 18.5 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 13.5 B S- TH+TR 0.737 .500 10.5 0.85 2730 16 0.76 9.7 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 9.7 B+ Cycle= 7011 Int Total 0.673________________________________________________> 9.0 B+ Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 1997 DHV AM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.67 Vehicle Delay Sq 21 LD/** North I ------------------------------------- I Phase l I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I ------------------------------------- + * ++++I I ++++I + *> I + v I v **** I I I v I 04/03/97 13:11:15 9.0 Level of Service B+ ------------------------------------- G/C=0.143 G/C=0.457 I G/C=0.171 G= 10.0" G= 32.0" G= 12.0" Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 6.0" I Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=21.4% OFF=75.7% ------------------------------------- C= 70 sec G= 54.0 sec = 77.1% Y=16.0 sec = 22.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane Width/1 g/C I Service Rate Adj HCM I L Max) I Group I Lanes Regd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Used I ®C (vph) ®E IVolumel v/c Delay 190% I S Queue I N Approach 6.8 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I TH 124/2 I0.450 10.714 12661 12661 11640 10.616 I 3.6 I A 1231 ftI LT 1 11/1 10.182 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.171 I 224 I 296 I 241 10.814 I 28.9 I*D+I 195 ftI S Approach 9.7 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I TH+TRI 36/3 10.377 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I0.500 12730 12730 12013 10.737 I 9.7 I*B+I 331 ftI E Approach 13.5 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I RT 112/1 10.259 10.414 I 613 I 669 I 347 10.519 I 10.5 I B 1198 ftI I LT 112/1 10.161 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I0.200 I 283 I 357 I 215 I0.602 I 18.5 I*C+I 168 ftI Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 1997 DHV PM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 1 0 1 1548 i 223 II 1 0.0 124.0 1 11.0 II I 0 l 2 1 1 II I I I II ------------- 0 0.0 0 / ------------------- 0 0.0 0 -- ------------------- 0 0.0 0 \ -------------------- I LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. I I 03/31/97 15:02:32 Area Location Type: NONCBD I Key: VOLUMES -- > I I WIDTHS 1 v LANES \ -------------------- 338 12 .0' . 1 -- ------------------- 0 0.0 0 / ------------------- 238 12.0 1 \ I II I I I I 0 1 1898 I II 0.0 1 36.0 1 II 0 I 3 I II I I / ------------- I 173 I Phasing: 0.0 I 0 I i /I\ I I North I SEQUENCE 21 PERMSV N N N N OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 0.90 1.00 1.00 0- N N Y 3 3 3 E 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 1.00 0.90 1.00 0- Y N Y 3 3 3 S 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 NO 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 W 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 0.90 0.90 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 1 Phase 6 1 LD/** ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I +*^ i + I I I I I i +*++++1 + I ++++I I I I /I\ I + *> I + I I I I I I I v I v I ****I I I I I I I ^ I v I I I I North I I **>I I I I I I I I ** I I I I I ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 G/C=0.133 I G/C=0.522 1 G/C=0.167 I G/C=0.000 1 G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.000 I I G= 12.0" 1 G= 47.0" I G= 15.0" I G= 0.0" ( G= 0.0" 1 G= 0.0" I 1 Y+R= 5.0" 1 Y+R= 6.0" 1 Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 0.0" 1 Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0" 1 I OFF-- 0.0% I OFF=18.9% I OFF=77.8% 1 OFF-- 0.0% I OFF= 0.0% 1 OFF-- 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------- C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 1997 DHV PM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT -- vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- N-RT 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 N-TH 1548 1.00 1548 TH 1548 2 1.05 1625 0.00 0.00 N-LT 223 1.00 223 LT 223 1 1.00 223 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E-RT 338 1.00 338 RT 338 1 1.00 338 0.00 1.00 E-TH 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 E-LT 238 1.00 238 LT 238 1 1.00 238 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S-TR 173 1.00 173 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 S-TH 1898 1.00 1898 TH+TR 2071 3 1.26 2609 0.00 0.08 S-LT ------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet 03/31/97 15:02:32 Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of -------------------------------------------------- Sat- ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N- TH 1900 2 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 0.967 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1728 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E- RT 1900 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.850 1.000 1.00 1615 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1787 S- TH+TR 1900 3 1.000 0.973 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.987 1.000 1.00 5478 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- -- vph vphg -- -- vph -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------ N- TH 1625 3725 0.436 0.744 2773 0.586 N- LT Pri. 223 1728 0.129 0.156 269 0.829 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E- RT 338 1615 0.209 0.378 610 0.554 E- LT Pri. 238 1787 0.133 0.189 338 0.704 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S- TH+TR 2609 5478 0.476 0.556 3043 0.857 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Cycle Length, C 90 sec Sum(v/s) = 0.739 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = 0.821 Swift Street PUD 97037 03/31/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 15:02:32 1997 DHV PM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Level -of -Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C dl DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - N- TH 0.586 .744 4.0 0.85 2773 16 0.24 3.6 A N- LT 0.829 .156 28.0 0.85 269 16 12.99 36.8 D ------------------------------------------------------------------> 7.6 B+ E- RT 0.554 .378 16.7 0.85 610 16 0.85 15.1 C+ E- LT 0.704 .189 26.0 0.85 338 16 4.44 26.5 D+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 19.8 C+ S- TH+TR 0.857 .556 12.9 0.85 3043 16 1.91 12.9 B ------------------------------------------------------------------> 12.9 B Cycle= 9011 Int Total 0.741________________________________________________> 11.7 B Swift Street PUD 97037 03/31/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 15:02:32 1997 DHV PM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.74 Vehicle Delay 11.7 Level of Service B ------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 LD/** ------------------------------------- I + * ^ I + I I + * ++++1 + I ++++1 /I\ I + *> I + I I I I v I v I ****I I I I I v I North I I * *>I I I I * I I ------------------------------------- 1 G/C=0.133 I G/C=0.522 1 G/C=0.167 l 1 G= 12.0" 1 G= 47.0" 1 G= 15.0" I Y+R= 5.0" 1 Y+R= 6.0" 1 Y+R= 5.0" 1 OFF= 0.0% 1 OFF=18.9% 1 OFF=77.8% 1 ------------------------------------- C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane lWidth/I g/C I Service Ratel Adj I I HCM I L 190% Max1 I Group I Lanesl Reqd Used I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- @C (vph) @E 1Volumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I N Approach 7.6 B+ I TH 1 24/2 10.456 10.744 1 2773 1 2773 1 1625 10.586 1 3.6 1 A 1 263 ftl I LT 1 11/1 10.195 10.156 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 156 1 263 1 223 10.829 1 36.8 I*D 1 237 ftl S Approach 12.9 B I TH+TRI 36/3 10.485 10.556 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3037 1 3043 1 2609 10.857 1 12.9 1*B 1 491 ftI E Approach 19.8 C+ I RT 1 12/1 10.272 10.378 1 525 1 610 1 338 10.554 1 15.1 1 C+1 263 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.198 10.189 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 222 1 337 1 238 10.704 1 26.5 I*D+l 243 ftI Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 1997 DHV PM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 04/03/97 12:43:59 Area Location Type: NONCBD I I 1 11 1 Key: VOLUMES--> 1 0 1 1548 I 237 II I 1 WIDTHS 1 0.0 1 24.0 1 11.0 11 1 v LANES I 0 1 2 1 1 II -------------------- I I I II \ 381 12.0 1 ------------- / I \------------------- 0 0.0 0 / ------------------- 0 0.0 0 -- ------------------- 0 0.0 0 \ -------------------- I LOSTTIME = 3.0 sec. 1 I -- 0 0.0 0 ------------------- + / 268 12.0 1 \ I / /I\ I I North I II 0 1 1898 1 184 1 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 II 0.0 1 36.0 1 0.0 1 PERMSV N N N N I I 0 I 3 1 0 1 OVERLP Y Y Y Y II I 1 I LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 0.90 1.00 1.00 0- N N Y 3 3 3 E 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 1.00 0.90 1.00 0- Y N Y 3 3 3 S 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 NO 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 W 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 0.90 0.90 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 1 Phase 6 1 LD/** ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I +*^ I + I I I I I 1 +*++++1 + /I\ I + *> I + I I I I I I I v I v I i I I v I I I I North I I I ** I I I I I I I ** I I I I I ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 G/C=0.133 1 G/C=0.522 1 G/C=0.167 1 G/C=0.000 1 G/C=0.000 i G/C=0.000 1 1 G= 12.0" 1 G= 47.0" 1 G= 15.0" 1 G= 0.0" 1 G= 0.0" 1 G= 0.0" 1 1 Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 6.0" 1 Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 0.0" 1 Y+R= 0.0" 1 Y+R= 0.0" 1 1 OFF-- 0.0% 1 OFF=18.9% 1 OFF=77.8% 1 OFF-- 0.0% 1 OFF-- 0.0% 1 OFF-- 0.0% 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 1997 DHV PM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ N-RT 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 N-TH 1548 1.00 1548 TH 1548 2 1.05 1625 0.00 0.00 N-LT 237 1.00 237 LT 237 1 1.00 237 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E-RT 381 1.00 381 RT 381 1 1.00 381 0.00 1.00 E-TH 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 E-LT 268 1.00 268 LT 268 1 1.00 268 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S-TR 184 1.00 184 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 S-TH 1898 1.00 1898 TH+TR 2082 3 1.26 2623 0.00 0.09 S-LT ------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet 04/03/97 12:43:59 Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of -------------------------------------------------- Sat- ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N- TH 1900 2 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 0.967 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1728 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E- RT 1900 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.850 1.000 1.00 1615 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1787 S- TH+TR 1900 3 1.000 0.973 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.987 1.000 1.00 5475 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- -- vph vphg -- - vph ------------------------------------------------------------------ N- TH 1625 3725 0.436 0.744 2773 0.586 N- LT Pri. 237 1728 0.137 0.156 269 0.881 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E- RT 381 1615 0.236 0.378 610 0.625 E- LT Pri. 268 1787 0.150 0.189 338 0.793 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S- TH+TR 2623 5475 0.479 0.556 3042 0.862 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Cycle Length, C 90 sec Sum(v/s) = 0.766 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = 0.851 Swift Street PUD 97037 04/03/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 12:43:59 1997 DHV PM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.20] - HCM Level -of -Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C dl DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - N- TH 0.586 .744 4.0 0.85 2773 16 0.24 3.6 A N- LT 0.881 .156 28.3 0.85 269 16 18.67 42.7 E+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 8.6 B+ E- RT 0.625 .378 17.3 0.85 610 16 1.43 16.2 C+ E- LT 0.793 .189 26.5 0.85 338 16 8.32 30.8 D+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 22.2 C S- TH+TR 0.862 .556 13.0 0.85 3042 16 2.00 13.0 B ------------------------------------------------------------------> 13.0 B Cycle= 9011 Int Total 0.754________________________________________________> 12.6 B Swift Street PUD 97037 04/03/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 12:43:59 1997 DHV PM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.75 Vehicle Delay 12.6 Level of Service B ------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 I Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 LD/** ------------------------------------- i + * ^ I + I I I + * ++++I + 1 ++++1 /I\ I + *> I + I I I I v I v I ****I I I I I v I North I I * *>I I I I I ** I I I I * * I I ------------------------------------- I G/C=0.133 I G/C=0.522 I G/C=0.167 I I G= 12.0" 1 G= 47.0" I G= 15.0" I I Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 6.0" I Y+R= 5.0" I I OFF-- 0.0% i OFF=18.9% I OFF=77.8% ------------------------------------- C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane (Width/1 g/C I Service Rate1 Adj I I HCM I L 190% Maxi I Group I Lanesl Reqd Used I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- @C (vph) @E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue I N Approach 8.6 B+ I TH 1 24/2 10.456 10.744 1 2773 1 2773 1 1625 10.586 1 3.6 1 A 1 263 fti I LT 1 11/1 10.202 10.156 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 156 1 263 1 237 10.881 1 42.7 I*E+1 252 fti S Approach ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 13.0 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I TH+TRI 36/3 10.487 10.556 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3036 1 3042 1 2623 10.862 1 13.0 I*B 1 494 ft1 E Approach --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 22.2 C I RT 1 12/1 10.297 10.378 1 525 1 610 1 381 10.625 1 16.2 1 C+1 296 ft1 I LT 1 12/1 10.214 10.189 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 222 1 337 1 268 10.793 1 30.8 I*D+1 273 fti Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street -2002 DHV AM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 0 11687 0.0 124.0 0 0.0 0 04/01/97 08:59:03 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES -------------------- \ 367 12.0 1 -- 0 0.0 0 ------------------- / 228 12.0 1 North /------------- 1537 154 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 36.0 I 0.0 PERMSV N N N N 3 I 0 OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT N 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 0.90 1.00 1.00 0- N N Y 3 3 3 E 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 1.00 0.90 1.00 0- Y N Y 3 3 3 S 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 NO 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 W ---- 0.0 ----- 2.0 -------------- 2.0 2.0 NO ------- 0 0 --- 0.90 -------------- 0.90 0.90 0- -------- N -------- N N 3 -------- 3 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 1 Phase 6 1 LD/** ------------------------------------------------------------------------- + * + + * ++++ + /�\ I + *> + I v I v v North ( * *> * * ------------------------------------------- G/C=0.143 G/C=0.457 G/C=0.171 G/C=0.000 -------------------- G/C=0.000 G/C=0.000 G= 10.0 G= 32.0" G= 12.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0" Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 6.0" I Y+R= 5.0" Y+R= 0.0" Y+R= 0.0" Y+R= 0.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=21.4% OFF=75.7% I OFF= 0.0% OFF= 0.0% OFF= 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------- C= 70 sec G= 54.0 sec = 77.1% Y=16.0 sec = 22.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 2002 DHV AM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT -- vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- N-RT 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 N-TH 1687 1.00 1687 TH 1687 2 1.05 1771 0.00 0.00 N-LT 213 1.00 213 LT 213 1 1.00 213 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E-RT 367 1.00 367 RT 367 1 1.00 367 0.00 1.00 E-TH 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 E-LT 228 1.00 228 LT 228 1 1.00 228 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S-TR 154 1.00 154 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 S-TH 1537 1.00 1537 TH+TR 1691 3 1.26 2131 0.00 0.09 S-LT 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet 04/01/97 08:59:03 Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of -------------------------------------------------- Sat- ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 0.967 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1728 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E- RT 1900 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.850 1.000 1.00 1615 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1787 S- TH+TR 1900 3 1.000 0.973 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.986 1.000 1.00 5473 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- -- vph vphg -- -- vph -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------ N- TH 1771 3725 0.475 0.714 2661 0.666 N- LT Pri. 213 1728 0.123 0.171 296 0.720 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E- RT 367 1615 0.227 0.414 669 0.549 E- LT Pri. 228 1787 0.128 0.200 357 0.639 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S- TH+TR 2131 5473 0.389 0.500 2736 0.779 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Cycle Length, C 70 sec Sum(v/s) = 0.640 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = 0.735 Swift Street PUD 97037 04/01/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 08:59:03 2002 DHV AM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.203 - HCM Level -of -Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C dl DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - N- TH 0.666 .714 4.1 0.85 2661 16 0.45 4.0 A N- LT 0.720 .171 20.8 0.85 296 16 5.59 23.3 C ------------------------------------------------------------------> 6.0 B+ E- RT 0.549 .414 11.8 0.85 669 16 0.74 10.8 B E- LT 0.639 .200 19.5 0.85 357 16 2.66 19.2 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 14.0 B S- TH+TR 0.779 .500 10.9 0.85 2736 16 1.06 10.3 B ------------------------------------------------------------------> 10.3 B Cycle= 70" Int Total 0.709________________________________________________> 9.0 B+ Swift Street PUD 97037 04/01/97 -Shelburne Road / Swift Street 08:59:03 2002 DHV AM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.71 Vehicle Delay 9.0 Level of Service B+ Sq 21 LD/** /i\ North I ------------------------------------- I Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 ------------------------------------- + * + 1 + * ++++1 l ++++ + *> l 1 l v l v 1 **** v ------------------------------------- 1 G/C=0.143 G/C=0.457 1 G/C=0.171 G= 10.0" G= 32.0" G= 12.0" l Y+R= 5.0" l Y+R= 6.0" l Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=21.4% OFF=75.7% ------------------------------------- C= 70 sec G= 54.0 sec = 77.1% Y=16.0 sec = 22.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I Lane Width/ g/C 1 Service Rate Adj l HCM I L 190% Maxl I Group I Lanesl Reqd Used ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I ®C (vph) CAE lVolumel v/c IDelay I S I Queue I N Approach 6.0 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I TH 1 24/2 10.482 10.714 1 2661 1 2661 1 1771 10.666 1 4.0 1 A 1 249 fti 1 LT 1 11/1 10.165 10.171 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 224 1 296 1 213 10.720 1 23.3 I*C 1 173 ftl S Approach 10.3 B ----------------------------------------------------------------- I TH+TRI 36/3 10.396 10.500 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 2736 1 2736 1 2131 10.779 1 10.3 1*B 1 351 ftl E Approach 14.0 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I RT 1 12/1 10.271 10.414 1 613 1 669 1 367 10.549 1 10.8 1 B 1 209 ftl I LT 1 12/1 10.169 10.200 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 283 1 357 1 228 10.639 1 19.2 I*C+l 178 ft1 Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 2002 DHV AM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 0 1687 0.0 124.0 257 11.0 1 11 0 0.0 0 04/03/97 13:09:03 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES -------------------- \ 374 12.0 1 -- 0 0.0 0 ------------------- I / 232 12.0 1 North /------------- 1537 186 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 36.0 0.0 I PERMSV N N N N 3 0 I OVERLP Y Y Y Y I I LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type ------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- N 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 0.90 1.00 1.00 0- N N Y 3 3 3 E 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 1.00 0.90 1.00 0- Y N Y 3 3 3 S 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 NO 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 W 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 0.90 0.90 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sq 21 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 I Phase 6 I LD/** ------------------------------------------------------------------------- I + * I + i + * ++++I I ++++I /I\ I + *> I + v v i v*** North * *> !I ------------------------------------------ I G/C=0.457 I G/C=0.171 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.000 G= 10.0" I G= 32.0" I G= 12.0" I G= 0.0" I G= 0.0" I G= 0.0" Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 6.0" I Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=21.4% I OFF=75.7% I OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------- C= 70 sec G= 54.0 sec = 77.1% Y=16.0 sec = 22.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 2002 DHV AM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ N-RT 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 N-TH 1687 1.00 1687 TH 1687 2 1.05 1771 0.00 0.00 N-LT 257 1.00 257 LT 257 1 1.00 257 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E-RT 374 1.00 374 RT 374 1 1.00 374 0.00 1.00 E-TH 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 E-LT 232 1.00 232 LT 232 1 1.00 232 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S-TR 186 1.00 186 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 S-TH 1537 1.00 1537 TH+TR 1723 3 1.26 2171 0.00 0.11 S-LT ------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet 04/03/97 13:09:03 Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of -------------------------------------------------- Sat- ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N- TH 1900 2 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 0.967 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1728 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E- RT 1900 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.850 1.000 1.00 1615 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1787 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S- TH+TR 1900 3 1.000 0.974 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.984 1.000 1.00 5462 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- -- vph vphg -- -- vph -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------ N- TH 1771 3725 0.475 0.714 2661 0.666 N- LT Pri. 257 1728 0.149 0.171 296 0.868 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E- RT 374 1615 0.232 0.414 669 0.559 E- LT Pri. 232 1787 0.130 0.200 357 0.650 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S- TH+TR 2171 5462 0.398 0.500 2731 0.795 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Cycle Length, C 70 sec Sum(v/s) = 0.676 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = 0.776 Swift Street PUD 97037 04/03/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 13:09:03 2002 DHV AM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Level -of -Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C dl DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - N- TH 0.666 .714 4.1 0.85 2661 16 0.45 4.0 A N- LT 0.868 .171 21.5 0.85 296 16 15.`88 34.1 D ------------------------------------------------------------------> 7.8 B+ E- RT 0.559 .414 11.9 0.85 669 16 0.81 10.9 B E- LT 0.650 .200 19.6 0.85 357 16 2.88 19.5 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 14.2 B S- TH+TR 0.795 .500 11.0 0.85 2731 16 1.21 10.6 B ------------------------------------------------------------------> 10.6 B Cycle= 70" Int Total 0.726________________________________________________> 9.9 B+ Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 2002 DHV AM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC(Ver 1.201 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.73 Vehicle Delay ------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 LD/** ------------------------I------------- + * + + * ++++I + ++++ + *> + v v North 04/03/97 13:09:03 9.9 Level of Service B+ ^ I v * *>� * * * * - ----------- ------------------------- I G/C=0.143 G/C=0.457 G/C=0.171 G= 10.0" G= 32.0" G= 12.0" Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 6.0" I Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=21.4% OFF=75.7% ------------------------------------- C= 70 sec G= 54.0 sec = 77.1% Y=16.0 sec = 22.9% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Width/j g/C I Service Rate Adj I I HCM L 190% Maxi Group I Lanesl Reqd ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Used I ®C (vph) ®E IVolumel v/c I Delay I S I Queue N Approach 7.8 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH 1 24/2 10.482 10.714 1 2661 1 2661 1 1771 10.666 1 4.0 1 A 1 249 ftj LT 1 11/1 10.191 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.171 1 224 1 296 1 257 10.868 1 34.1 J*D 1 208 ftj S Approach 10.6 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TH+TRI 36/3 10.404 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.500 1 2731 1 2731 1 2171 10.795 1 10.6 J*B 1 357 ftj E Approach 14.2 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RT 1 12/1 10.275 10.414 1 613 1 669 1 374 10.559 1 10.9 1 B 1 213 ftj LT 1 12/1 10.171 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.200 1 283 1 357 1 232 10.650 1 19.5 I*C+l 182 ftl Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 2002 DHV PM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 0 1672 0.0 124.0 N 0 0.0 0 04/01/97 08:30:09 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES -------------------- \ 365 12.01 ------------------- -- 0 0.0 0 ------------------- / 257 12.0 1 North /------------- 2049 187 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 36.0 0.0 PERMSV N N N N 3 I 0 I OVERLP Y Y Y Y LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- N 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 0.90 1.00 1.00 0- N N Y 3 3 3 E 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 1.00 0.90 1.00 0- Y N Y 3 3 3 S 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 NO 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 W 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 0.90 0.90 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sq 21 1 Phase 1 1 Phase 2 1 Phase 3 1 Phase 4 1 Phase 5 1 Phase 6 1 LD/** ------------------------------------------------------------------------- + * ^ I + + * ++++I + ++++� + *> + ^ I v North * *> * * * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------- G/C=0.133 G/C=0.522 G/C=0.167 G/C=0.000 G/C=0.000 G/C=0.000 G= 12.0" G= 47.0" G= 15.0 G= 0.0 G= 0.0" G= 0.0" Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 6.0" Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=18.9% OFF=77.8% I OFF= 0.0% OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------- C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Swift Street PUD 97037 04/01/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 08:30:09 2002 DHV PM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT -- vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- N-RT 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 N-TH 1672 1.00 1672 TH 1672 2 1.05 '1756 0.00 0.00 N-LT 241 1.00 241 LT 241 1 1.00 241 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E-RT 365 1.00 365 RT 365 1 1.00 365 0.00 1.00 E-TH 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 E-LT 257 1.00 257 LT 257 1 1.00 257 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S-TR 187 1.00 187 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 S-TH 2O49 1.00 2049 TH+TR 2236 3 1.26 2817 0.00 0.08 S-LT ------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of -------------------------------------------------- Sat- ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg N- TH 1900 2 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 0.967 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1728 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E- RT 1900 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.850 1.000 1.00 1615 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1787 S- TH+TR 1900 3 1.000 0.973 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.987 1.000 1.00 5478 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- vph vphg -- -- vph -- - N- TH 1756 3725 0.471 0.744 2773 0.633 N- LT Pri. 241 1728 0.140 0.156 269 0.896 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E- RT 365 1615 0.226 0.378 610 0.598 E- LT Pri. 257 1787 0.144 0.189 338 0.760 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S- TH+TR 2817 5478 0.514 0.556 3043 0.926 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Cycle Length, C 90 sec Sum(v/s) = 0.798 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = 0.886 Swift Street PUD 97037 04/01/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 08:30:09 2002 DHV PM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Level -of -Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C dl DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - N- TH 0.633 .744 4.2 0.85 2773 16 0.34 3.9 A N- LT 0.896 .156 28.3 0.85 269 16 20.71 44.8 E+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 8.9 B+ E- RT 0.598 .378 17.1 0.85 610 16 1.18 15.7 C+ E- LT 0.760 .189 26.3 0.85 338 16 6.60 28.9 D+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 21.2 C S- TH+TR 0.926 .556 13.9 0.85 3043 16 4.10 15.9 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 15.9 C+ Cycle= 90" Int Total 0.800________________________________________________> 13.9 B Swift Street PUD 97037 04/01/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 08:30:09 2002 DHV PM Background SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.80 Vehicle Delay 13.9 Level of Service B ------------------------------------- Sq 21 I Phase 1 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 l LD/** ------------------------------------- + * + + * ++++I I ++++I v v North I * *>I v * * * * ------------------------------------- I G/C=0.133 G/C=0.522 I G/C=0.167 G= 12.0" G= 47.0" G= 15.0" Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 6.0" I Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=18.9% OFF=77.8% ------------------------------------- C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lane Width/I g/C Service Rate Adj I I HCM L Maxl I Group Lanesl Reqd I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Used CSC (vph) CEDE l Volume) v/c I Delay 190% S Queue I N Approach 8.9 B+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I TH 124/2 10.487 10.744 12773 12773 11756 10.633 I 3.9 I A 1284 ftI I LT 111/1 I0.205 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.156 I 156 I 263 I 241 10.896 I 44.8 I*E+I 256 ftI S Approach 15.9 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I TH+TRI 36/3 10.519 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.556 13037 13043 12817 10.926 I 15.9 I*C+l 530 ftI E Approach 21.2 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I RT 112/1 10.288 10.378 I 525 I 610 I 365 10.598 I 15.7 I C+I 284 fti I LT 112/1 I0.208 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.189 I 222 1 337 I 257 I0.760 I 28.9 I*D+l 262 ftl Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 2002 DHV PM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Input Worksheet Intersection # 0 - 0 1672 0.0 124.0 255 11.0 1 0 0.0 0 04/03/97 13:09:33 Area Location Type: NONCBD Key: VOLUMES -- > WIDTHS v LANES -------------------- \ 408 12:Q 1 ------------------- /I\ -- 0 0.0 0 ------------------- / 287 12.0 1 North /------------- 2049 198 Phasing: SEQUENCE 21 36.0 I 0.0 PERMSV N N N N 3 I 0 OVERLP Y Y Y Y I I LEADLAG LD LD Appr Grade % Heavy Veh. Adj.Pkg Bus Pk.Hr.Factor Conf.Ped Actuated Arr.Type ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- - % RT TH LT Loc Nm Nb RT TH LT peds/hr RT TH LT RT TH LT ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- N 0.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 0.90 1.00 1.00 0- N N Y 3 3 3 E 0.0 0.0 2.0 1.0 NO 0 0 1.00 0.90 1.00 0- Y N Y 3 3 3 S 0.0 0.0 3.0 2.0 NO 0 0 1.00 1.00 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 W 0.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 NO 0 0 0.90 0.90 0.90 0- N N N 3 3 3 ---- -------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sq 21 I Phase 1 I Phase 2 I Phase 3 I Phase 4 I Phase 5 I Phase 6 1 LD/** ------------------------------------------------------------------------- + * I + /I\ I+ * ++++ ++++` + *> + I I North ------------ I G/C=0.133 ------------------- I G/C=0.522 I ----------------- G/C=0.167 I G/C=0.000 ------------------------- I G/C=0.000 I G/C=0.000 G= 12.0" I G= 47.0" G= 15.0" I G= 0.0" G= 0.0" G= 0.0" Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 6.0" I Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0" I Y+R= 0.0" OFF= 0.0% I OFF=18.9% I OFF=77.8% I OFF= 0.0% i OFF= 0.0% I OFF= 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------- C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% Swift Street PUD 97037 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 2002 DHV PM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Volume Adjustment Worksheet Appr Mvt Flow Lane Group No.of Lane Adj Prop.of -Mvt Vol PHF Rate Group Flow Lanes Util Flow LT RT -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ vph -- vph -- vph - -- vph -- -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ N-RT 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 N-TH 1672 1.00 1672 TH 1672 2 1.05 3,756 0.00 0.00 N-LT 255 1.00 255 LT 255 1 1.00 255 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E-RT 408 1.00 408 RT 408 1 1.00 408 0.00 1.00 E-TH 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 E-LT 287 1.00 287 LT 287 1 1.00 287 1.00 0.00 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S-TR 198 1.00 198 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 S-TH 2O49 1.00 2049 TH+TR 2247 3 1.26 2831 0.00 0.09 S-LT ------------------------------------------------------------------ 0 0.90 0 -- 0 0 1.00 0 0.00 0.00 SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Saturation Flow Adjustment Worksheet 04/03/97 13:09:33 Ap Lane No Adjustment Factors Adj pr Group Ideal of -------------------------------------------------- Sat- ch Mvmts Satfl Lns Lane Heavy Bus Ar Right Left Adj flow -- -- pcphg - Width Vehs Grade Parkg Block Loc Turn Turn Fact vphg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- N- TH 1900 2 1.000 0.980 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 1.000 1.00 3725 N- LT 1900 1 0.967 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1728 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- E- RT 1900 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.850 1.000 1.00 1615 E- LT 1900 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.000 0.950 1.00 1787 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S- TH+TR 1900 3 1.000 0.973 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.0 0.987 1.000 1.00 5475 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - HCM Capacity Analysis Worksheet Ap Lane LT Adj Adj Flow Green Lane V/C Crit pr Group Phase Flow Satfl Ratio Ratio Group Ratio Lane ch Mvts Type Rate Rate v/s g/C Capac v/c Grp -- -- -- vph vphg -- - vph N- TH 1756 3725 0.471 0.744 2773 0.633 N- LT Pri. 255 1728 0.148 0.156 269 0.948 ------------------------------------------------------------------ E- RT 408 1615 0.253 0.378 610 0.669 E- LT Pri. 287 1787 0.161 0.189 338 0.849 ------------------------------------------------------------------ S- TH+TR 2831 5475 0.517 0.556 3042 0.931 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Cycle Length, C 90 sec Sum(v/s) = 0.825 Lost Time Per Cycle, L 9.0 sec Xc = 0.917 Swift Street PUD 97037 04/03/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 13:09:33 2002 DHV PM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPACIVer 1.201 - HCM Level -of -Service Worksheet Ap Lane Vol Green Unif Delay Lane Cal Incr Lane Lan pr Group Ratio Ratio Delay Fact Group Term Delay Group Grp Appr Appr ch Mvts v/c g/C dl DF Capac m d2 Delay LOS Delay LOS -- -- -- -- sec/v -- vph - sec/v sec/v - sec/v - N- TH 0.633 .744 4.2 0.85 2773 16 0.34 3.9 A N- LT 0.948 .156 28.6 0.85 269 16 29.70 54.0 E ------------------------------------------------------------------> 10.3 B E- RT 0.669 .378 17.7 0.85 610 16 1.97 17.0 C+ E- LT 0.849 .189 26.8 0.85 338 16 12.48 35.3 D ------------------------------------------------------------------> 24.6 C S- TH+TR 0.931 .556 14.0 0.85 3042 16 4.37 16.3 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------> 16.3 C+ Cycle= 90" Int Total 0.814________________________________________________> 15.1 C+ Swift Street PUD 97037 04/03/97 Shelburne Road / Swift Street 13:09:33 2002 DHV PM w/Project SIGNAL94/TEAPAC[Ver 1.201 - Capacity Analysis Summary Intersection Averages: Degree of Saturation (v/c) 0.81 Vehicle Delay 15.1 Level of Service C+ ------------------------------------- Sq 21 I Phase 1 1 Phase 2 I Phase 3 I LD/** ------------------------------------- + * + + * ++++ v North I ------------------------------------- I G/C=0.133 G/C=0.522 I G/C=0.167 G= 12.0" I G= 47.0" G= 15.0" Y+R= 5.0" I Y+R= 6.0" l Y+R= 5.0" OFF= 0.0% OFF=18.9% OFF=77.8% ------------------------------------- C= 90 sec G= 74.0 sec = 82.2% Y=16.0 sec = 17.8% Ped= 0.0 sec = 0.0% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I LaneWidth/I g/C Service Rate l Adj I HCM L 190% Maxi I I Group Lanesl Reqd Used ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ®C (vph) ®E Volume v/c I Delay I S I Queue I N Approach 10.3 B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I TH 124/2 10.487 10.744 12773 12773 11756 10.633 I 3.9 I A 1284 ftI I LT 111/1 10.213 10.156 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I 156 I 263 I 255 10.948 I 54.0 I*E 1271 ftl S Approach 16.3 C+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I TH+TRI 36/3 10.522 10.556 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13036 13042 12831 10.931 I 16.3 I*C+l 533 ftl E Approach 24.6 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I RT 112/1 10.312 10.378 I 525 I 610 I 408 10.669 I 17.0 I C+I 317 ftI I LT 112/1 10.224 10.189 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I 222 I 337 I 287 10.849 I 35.3 I*D 1293 ftl 1 H S: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Farrell Street (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 1997 AM DHV Background Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's M SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's ------------ 0 > 1 < 0 N 170 127 51 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 0 > 1 < 0 N 9 360 287 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 ---------------- Northbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 19 1 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Southbound L T R 0 > 1 1 62 2 172 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 152 504 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1160 769 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1160 769 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.78 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 178 647 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1410 843 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1410 843 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.80 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.77 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 978 860 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 335 386 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.77 0.77 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 257 296 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 922 838 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 310 346 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.76 0.76 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.82 0.82 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.63 0.81 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 196 282 Page 2 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement -------- (pcph) ------ (pcph) ------ (pcph)(sec/veh) ------ ------- (veh) ------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- NB L 19 196 > NB T 1 257 > 238 16.9 0.3 C 16.9 NB R 5 1160 > SB L 62 282 > 282 16.5 0.9 C SB T 2 296 > 8.9 SB R 172 769 6.0 0.9 B EB L 170 843 5.3 0.8 B 2.6 WB L 9 1410 2.6 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 2.7 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Streets: (N-S) Farrell Street (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 1997 AM DHV w/Project Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's M SU/RV's (�) CV's M PCE's ------------ 0 > 1 < 0 N 171 129 51 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 --------------- 0 > 1 < 0 N 9 371 287 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 ---------------- 0 > 1 < 0 19 1 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 > 1 1 62 2 175 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 154 514 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1157 760 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1157 760 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.77 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB ------------------------------------------------------�- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 180 658 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1407 833 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1407 833 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.79 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.77 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 992 874 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 329 379 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.76 0.76 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 251 289 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 938 852 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 303 340 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.76 0.76 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.81 0.81 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.63 0.81 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 190 276 HCS: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement -------- (pcph) ------ (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) ------ ------ -------------- (veh) ----- (sec/veh) --------- NB L 19 190 > NB T 1 251 > 231 17.5 0.3 C 17.5 NB R 5 1157 > SB L 62 276 > 276 16.9 0.9 C SB T 2 289 > 9.0 SB R 175 760 6.1 1.0 B EB L 171 833 5.4 0.8 B 2.6 WB L 9 1407 2.6 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 2.8 sec/veh � 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Farrell Street (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 1997 PM DHV Background Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (�) SU/RV's (�) CV's (%) PCE's ------------ 0 > 1 < 0 N 117 280 23 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 --------------- 0 > 1 < 0 N 1 234 106 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 ---------------- 0 > 1 < 0 41 5 8 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 > 1 1 204 3 271 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 292 287 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 985 991 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 985 991 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.73 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 303 340 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1229 1181 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1229 1181 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.90 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.88 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 750 708 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 441 464 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.88 0.88 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 387 408 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 834 703 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 348 415 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.87 0.87 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.90 0.90 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.66 0.89 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 228 370 Page 2 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) -------------------- (veh) ----- (sec/veh) --------- -------- NB L ------ 41 ------ 228 > NB T 5 387 > 269 16.7 0.7 C 16.7 NB R 8 985 > SB L 204 370 > 371 21.3 3.2 D SB T 3 408 > 12.0 SB R 271 991 5.0 1.2 A EB L 117 1181 3.4 0.3 A 0.9 WB L 1 1229 2.9 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 5.5 sec/veh 1 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Farrell Street (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 1997 PM DHV w/Project Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC' s SU/RV's (�) CV's (�) PCE's ------------ Eastbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 N 125 294 23 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 ---------------- Westbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 N 1 235 106 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 -------------- Northbound L T R 0 > 1 < 0 41 5 8 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors Southbound L T R 0 > 1 1 204 3 275 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 --------------- 1.00 1.00 Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 306 288 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 969 989 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 969 989 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.72 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 317 341 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1211 1179 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1211 1179 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.89 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.87 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 772 731 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 429 451 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.87 0.87 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 373 392 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 858 726 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 337 402 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.86 0.86 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.89 0.89 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.65 0.88 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 218 355 Page 2 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement -------- (pcph) ------ (pcph) ------ (pcph)(sec/veh) ------ ------- (veh) ------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- NB L 41 218 > NB T 5 373 > 257 17.7 0.8 C 17.7 NB R 8 969 > SB L 204 355 > 355 23.4 3.4 D SB T 3 392 > 12.9 SB R 275 989 5.0 1.3 B EB L 125 1179 3.4 0.3 A 1.0 WB L 1 1211 3.0 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 5.8 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTAM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Farrell Street (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 2002 AM DHV Background Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R __J No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (%) SU/RV's (%) CV's (%) PCE's ------------ 0 > 1 < 0 N 183 137 55 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 --------------- 0 > 1 < 0 N 10 389 310 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 ---------------- 0 > 1 < 0 21 1 5i 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 > 1 1 67 2 185 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTAM.HCO ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 164 544 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1143 734 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1143 734 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.75 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB ------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 192 699 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1389 796 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1389 796 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.77 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.74 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1056 929 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 305 355 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.73 0.73 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 223 260 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 995 904 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 281 317 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.73 0.73 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.79 0.79 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.59 0.79 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 166 249 Page 2 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTAM.HCO Page 3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement -------- (pcph) ------ (pcph) ------ (pcph)(sec/veh) ------------- (veh) ------- ----- (sec/veh) --------- NB L 21 166 > NB T 1 223 > 199 20.9 0.4 D 20.9 NB R 5 1143 > SB L 67 249 > 249 19.9 1.1 C SB T 2 260 > 10.2 SB R 185 734 6.5 1.1 B EB L 183 796 5.9 1.0 B 2.9 WB L 10 1389 2.6 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 3.1 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIr'TPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Farrell Street (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information... ...... 2002 AM DHV w/Project Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R __J No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (�) SU/RV's (�) CV's M PCE's ------------ 0 > 1 < 0 N 184 139 55 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 --------------- 0 > 1 < 0 N 10 400 310 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 ---------------- 0 > 1 < 0 21 1 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 > 1 1 67 2 188 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 --------------- 1.00 1.00 Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 166 555 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1141 725 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1141 725 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 1.00 0.74 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB ------------------------------------------------------=- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 194 710 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1386 787 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1386 787 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.77 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.74 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1070 943 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 299 349 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.73 0.73 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 217 254 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.99 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 1010 918 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 275 311 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.72 0.72 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.78 0.79 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.58 0.78 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 160 244 Page 2 I HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement -------- (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) ------- (veh) ----- (sec/veh) --------- NB L ------ 21 ------ 160 ------ > ------- NB T 1 217 > 193 21.7 0.4 D 21.7 NB R 5 1141 > SB L 67 244 > 244 20.5 1.1 D SB T 2 254 > 10.4 SB R 188 725 6.7 1.1 B EB L 184 787 6.0 1.0 B 2.9 WB L 10 1386 2.6 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 3.2 sec/veh Page 3 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Farrell Street (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 2002 PM DHV Background Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection -------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R I L T R I L T R L T R No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MCI (%) SU/RV's (�) CV's (�) PCE's ------------ 0 > 1 < 0 N 127 303 25 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 ---------------- 0 > 1 < 0 N 1 252 114 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 ---------------- 0 > 1 < 0 44 5 9 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 > 1 1 220 4 293 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 316 309 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 958 966 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 958 966 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 0.70 Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 328 366 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1196 1147 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1196 1147 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.89 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 1.00 0.86 Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 810 765 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 410 433 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.86 0.86 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 353 373 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 0.99 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 901 760 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 318 384 Major IT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.85 0.85 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.89 0.88 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.62 0.88 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 196 337 Page 2 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 3 Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) (sec/veh) -------- NB L ------ 44 ------ 196 ------------- > ------- ----- --------- NB T 5 353 > 234 20.4 1.0 D 20.4 NB R 9 958 > SB L 220 337 > 338 29.3 4.2 D SB T 4 373 > 15.7 SB R 293 966 5.3 1.4 B EB L 127 1147 3.5 0.3 A 1.0 WB L 1 1196 3.0 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 7.0 sec/veh HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO Page 1 Lamoureux, Stone & O'Leary Consulting Engineers, Inc. 14 Morse Drive Essex Jct., VT 05452-0000 Ph: (802) 878-4450 Streets: (N-S) Farrell Street (E-W) Swift Street Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 15 (min) Analyst ................... J. Carriere Date of Analysis.......... 3/28/97 Other Information ......... 2002 PM DHV w/Project Two-way Stop -controlled Intersection ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound L T R L T R L T R L T R __J No. Lanes Stop/Yield Volumes PHF Grade MC's (�) SU/RV's (�) CV's ($) PCE's ------------ 0 > 1 < 0 N 135 317 25 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 0 > 1 < 0 N 1 253 114 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1.00 -------------- 0 > 1 < 0 44 5 9 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 ---------------- Adjustment Factors 0 > 1 1 220 4 297 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1.00 1.00 1.00 --------------- Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver ------------------------------------------------------------------ Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.00 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.00 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 6.50 3.40 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- Worksheet for TWSC Intersection -------------------------------------------------------- Step 1: RT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 330 310 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 942 964 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 942 964 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 0.99 0.69 -------------------------------------------------------- Step 2: LT from Major Street WB EB ------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 342 367 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 1178 1146 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 1178 1146 Prob. of Queue -Free State: 1.00 0.88 TH Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 RT Saturation Flow Rate: (pcphpl) 1700 1700 Major LT Shared Lane Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 1.00 0.85 Step 3: TH from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 832 788 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 399 421 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.85 0.85 Movement Capacity: (pcph) 340 359 Prob. of Queue -Free State: -------------------------------------------------------- 0.99 0.99 Step 4: LT from Minor Street NB SB -------------------------------------------------------- Conflicting Flows: (vph) 926 782 Potential Capacity: (pcph) 308 373 Major LT, Minor TH Impedance Factor: 0.84 0.84 Adjusted Impedance Factor: 0.88 0.88 Capacity Adjustment Factor due to Impeding Movements 0.61 0.87 Movement Capacity: (pcph) -------------------------------------------------------- 187 324 Page 2 HCS: Unsignalized Intersections Release 2.1c SWIFTPM.HCO ------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------- Intersection Performance Summary Avg. 95% Flow Move Shared Total Queue Approach Rate Cap Cap Delay Length LOS Delay Movement (pcph) (pcph) (pcph)(sec/veh) (veh) ----- (sec/veh) --------- -------- NB L ------ 44 ------ 187 ------------- > ------- NB T 5 340 > 223 21.7 1.0 D 21.7 NB R 9 942 > SB L 220 324 > 325 32.4 4.5 E SB T 4 359 > 17.0 SB R 297 964 5.4 1.5 B EB L 135 1146 3.6 0.4 A 1.0 WB L 1 1178 3.1 0.0 A 0.0 Intersection Delay = 7.4 sec/veh Page 3 ATTACHMENT B Signal Warrant Analyses LAMOUREUX, STONE & O'LEARY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 MORSE DRIVE ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 INTERSECTION SIGNAL WARRANT EVAL UATION INTERSECTION: Swift Street PUD PROJECT #: 97037 TOWN: South Burlington BY: J. Carriere COUNT DATE: 3/19&20/97 DATE: 03/27/97 SCENARIO: 2002 Background INPUT OBSERVED VOLUMES: HOUR EASTBOUND I WESTBOUND I NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND BEGIN LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT 0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0700 128 100 46 274 5 246 201 452 II 1 2 14 55 3 116 174 0800 120 98 16 234 4 238 158 400 18 0 3 21 47 3 109 159 0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1400 72 137 14 223 4 106 54 164 9 2 3 14 59 2 76 137 1500 93 157 20 270 1 168 82 251 28 5 4 37 89 3 156 248 1600 83 219 21 323 2 194 91 287 23 3 5 31 127 2 184 313 1700 113 237 5 355 0 161 86 247 20 3 4 27 194 2 233 429 1800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MAJOR STREET (E/W or N/S)? E/W NUMBER OF LANES EACH APPROACH MAJOR STREET? 1 (EXCLUDING TURN LANES) MINOR STREET? 1 (HIGHER VOLUME APPROACH) DOES HIGHER VOLUME MINOR APPROACH HAVE AN EXCLUSIVE (IF YES, SUBTRACT ONE LANE FROM RT LANE (Y or N)? Y HIGHER VOLUME MINOR APPROACH) POSTED SPEED LIMIT? 35 EST. 85-PERCENTILE SPEED? 40 MONTHLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR = 1.05 (AAWDT BASE) MAJOR ST. GROWTH FACTOR = 1.08 TO: 2002 MINOR ST. GROWTH FACTOR = 1.08 TO: 2002 Pace 1 of 3 O:\1997\97037\SIGWAR.WB1 LAMOUREUX, STONE & O'LEARY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 MORSE DRIVE ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 INTERSECTION SIGNAL WARRANT EVALUATION INPUT ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT VOLUMES: HOUR EASTBOUND WESTBOUND I NORTHBOUND I SOUTHBOUND BEGIN LT TH RT TOT I LT TH RT TOT I LT TH RT TOT I LT TH RT TOT 0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 (1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ADJUSTED AVERAGE WEEKDAY VOLUMES: HOUR EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND BEGIN LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT 0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0700 145 113 52 310 6 279 228 513 12 1 0 13 62 3 0 65 0800 136 111 18 265 5 270 179 454 20 0 0 20 53 3 0 56 0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1400 82 155 16 253 5 120 61 186 10 2 0 12 67 2 0 69 1500 105 178 23 306 1 191 93 285 32 6 0 38 101 3 0 104 1600 94 248 24 366 2 220 103 325 26 3 0 29 144 2 0 146 1700 128 269 6 403 0 183 98 281 23 3 0 26 220 2 0 227 1800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Paqe 2 of 3 Q:\1997\97037\SIG\ LAMOUREUX, STONE & O'LEARY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 MORSE DRIVE ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 INTERSECTION SIGNAL WARRANT EVAL UA TION TOTAL HIGHER ------------ WARRANT ----------- MAJOR MINOR THRESHOLDS: 1 2 8 9 11 HOUR STREET APPROACH MAJOR STREET 500 750 600 SEE LOOKUP BEGIN VOLUME VOLUME MINOR STREET 150 75 120 TABLES 0600 0 0 N N N N N 0700 823 65 N N N N N 0800 719 56 N N N N N 0900 0 0 N N N N N 1000 0 0 N N N N N 1100 0 0 N N N N N 1200 0 0 N N N N N 1300 0 0 N N N N N 1400 439 69 N N N N N 1500 591 104 N N N N N 1600 691 146 N N Y N N 1700 684 222 Y N Y Y N 1800 0 0 N N N N N 1900 0 0 N N N N N N>=8? N>=8? N>=8? N>=4? N>=l? NO NO NO NO NO Page 3 of 3 Q:\1997\97037\SIGWAR.INB1 LAMOUREUX, STONE & O'LEARY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 MORSE DRIVE ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 INTERSECTION SIGNAL WARRANT EVAL UATION INTERSECTION: Swift Su-cct PUD PROJECT #: 91037 TOWN: South Burlington BY: J. Carriere COUNT DATE: 3/ 19R 20/ 97 DATE: 04/03; 97 SCENARIO: 2002 w.Project INPUT OBSERVED VOLUMES: HOUR EASTBOUND I WESTBOUND I NORTHBOUND I SOUTHBOUND BEGIN LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT 0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0700 123 100 46 274 5 246 201 452 11 1 2 14 55 3 116 174 0800 120 98 16 234 4 238 158 400 13 0 3 21 47 3 109 159 0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1400 72 137 14 223 4 106 54 164 9 2 3 14 59 2 76 137 1500 93 157 20 270 1 1.68 82 251 28 5 4 37 89 3 156 248 1600 83 219 21 323 2 194 91 287 23 3 5 31 127 2 184 313 1700 113 237 5 355 0 161 86 247 20 3 4 27 194 2 233 429 1800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MAJOR STREET (E/W or N/S)? E/W NUMBER OF LANES EACH APPROACH MAJOR STREET? I (EXCLUDING TURN LANES) MINOR STREET? 1 (HIGHER VOLUME APPROACH) DOES HIGHER VOLUME MINOR APPROACH HAVE AN EXCLUSIVE (IF YES, SUBTRACT ONE LANE FROM RT LANE (Y or N)? Y HIGHER VOLUME MINOR APPROACH) POSTED SPEED LIMIT? 35 EST. 85-PERCENTILE SPEED? 40 MONTHLY ADJUSTMENT FACTOR = 1.05 (AAWDT BASE) MAJOR ST. GROWTH FACTOR = 1.08 TO: 2002 MINOR ST. GROWTH FACTOR = 1.08 TO: 2002 Page 1 of 3 Q:\1997\970' LAMOUREUX, STONE & O'LEARY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 MORSE DRIVE ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 INTERSECTIONSIGNAL WARRANT EVAL UA TION INPUT ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT VOLUMES: HOUR EASTBOUND I WESTBOUND I NORTHBOUND I SOUTHBOUND BEGIN LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT 0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0700 2 4 0 6 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0800 0 6 0 6 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1400 6 9 0 15 0 911 0 911 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 1500 12 10 0 22 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 1600 7 12 0 19 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 1700 8 11 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 1800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ADJUSTED AVERAGE WEEKDAY VOLUMES: HOUR EASTBOUND WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND BEGIN LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT LT TH RT TOT 0600 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0700 147 117 52 316 6 288 228 522 12 1 0 13 62 3 0 65 0800 136 117 18 271 5 278 179 462 20 0 0 20 53 3 0 5 0900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1400 88 164 16 268 5 1031 61 1097 10 2 0 12 67 2 0 1500 117 188 23 328 1 193 93 287 32 6 0 38 101 3 0 1600 101 260 24 385 2 225 103 330 26 3 0 29 144 2 1700 136 280 6 422 0 183 98 281 23 3 0 26 220 2 1800 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 2 of 3 Q:\1 1 LAMOUREUX, STONE & O'LEARY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 14 MORSE DRIVE ESSEX JUNCTION, VERMONT 05452 INTERSECTION SIGNAL WARRANT EVAL UATION TOTAL HIGHER __---WARRANT__-_ MAJOR MINOR THRESHOLDS: 1 2 8 9 11 HOUR STREET APPROACH MAJOR STREET 500 750 600 SEE LOOKUP BEGIN VOLUME VOLUME MINOR STREET 150 75 120 TABLES 0600 0 0 N N N N N 0700 838 65 N N N N N 0800 733 56 N N N N N 0900 0 0 N N N N N 1000 0 0 N N N N N 1100 0 0 N N N N N 1200 0 0 N N N N N 1300 0 0 N N N N N 1400 1365 69 N N N N N 1500 615 104 N N N N N 1600 715 146 N N Y N N 1700 703 222 Y N Y Y N 1800 0 0 N N N N N 1900 0 0 N N N N N N>=8? N>=8? N5=8? N>=4? N>=1? NO NO NO NO NO Page 3 of 3 Q:\1997\97037\S� CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTOIST DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZOI E'qG 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 11, 2005 Daniel B. Morrissey 69 Farrell Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Minutes Dear Mr. Morrissey: Enclosed, please find a copy of the minutes from the May 17, 2005 Development Review Board meeting. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, )Oj� Betsy McDonough Planning & Zoning Assistant Encl. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BARD 17 MAY 2005 Mr. Hall then outlined their reasons for requesting a reopening of the hearing. The first reason involves minor mistakes (mislabeling of north and south, location of a utility line, etc.). The second larger issue is the number of houses that triggers construction of the bike path and the road (Stipulations 11 and 21). Mr. Hall said the latter issue seems to have resulted from a compromise position with the City Council. He felt it would be appropriate for the Board to hear from the applicant as to what would be an appropriate number of houses. Mr. Dinklage agreed that the applicant did not have an opportunity to comment on the 206 number. Mr. Kupferman said he had no objection to reopening. He was not sure what would trigger a developer's financial ability to build a road. Mr. Dinklage stressed to the applicant that if the Board does reopen, they would have to get all of their information to staff so both staff and the City Attorney can review it prior to the hearing. Mr. Boucher then moved to reopen Master Plan Application #MP-04-01 of South Village Communities as detailed in a letter from the applicant to the Development Review Board dated 10 May 2005 and to set 5 July 2005 for the reopened hearing. Nis. Quimby seconded. Motion passed unanimously. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-05-34 of Daniel Morrissey to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas Building and a 38,428 sq. ft. building for general office use and a bank with drive -through service. The amendment consists of eliminating the proposed internal access road connecting fig Swift Street and 85 Swift Street: Mr. Vock noted that when the project was approved the Board had felt strongly about this connection. However, staff now notes a serious impact on wetlands as well as changes in the site including plans of Vermont Gas. Mr. Vock then showed the location of both buildings. He said the proposed road made sense 10 years ago. Mr. Vock then showed the location of the wetland and said that the impact of the road on that wetland is far greater than any benefit the road might bring. Mr. Belair said staff had no objection to the request. Ms. Quimby moved to approve Final Plat Application #SD-05-34 of Daniel Morrissey subject to the stipulations in the draft motion. Mr. Bolton seconded. Motion passed 6-1 with Mr. Boucher voting against. 5. Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application 4SD-05-36 of University Mail Realty Trust to amend a previously :approved planned unit development consisting of 675,115 sq ft GFA shopping center complex with 614,338 sq ft of -2- uaruI\JmmMm►`■!L�,a�:u.,.uou�c��►■rei.we3sa-.:..eounir,uuua���l���p��pp�em■ Auit- aft CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & 'ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONP 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: Brian Robertson, Associate Planner] n, RE: SD-05-34 Date: May 6, 2005 Cc: Paul Boisvert Agenda #4 Project Description Daniel Morrissey, hereafter referred to as the applicant, is seeking final plat approval to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a 38,428 sq. ft. building for general office use and a bank with drive -through service. The amendment consists of eliminating the proposed internal access road connecting 69 Swift Street and 85 Swift Street. Staff endorses the applicant's request to eliminate the access drive that incorporated into the Planning Commission's original approval of the subject planned unit development on July 15, 1997 (minutes enclosed). This access drive, which would connect the property at 69 Swift Street with the property at 85 Swift Street, would not significantly improve traffic circulation in the area. In addition, the layout of the roadway, as approved, will intersect a drainageway of the Potash Brook. Since the original approval in 1997, the City has become far more aggressive in its attempts of improving the water quality of impaired waterways, mainly the Potash Brook. Staff does not believe that any traffic benefits that may result from the construction of the roadway will justify the impacts to the drainageway that would result from its construction. The plans shall be revised to replace the reference to "conservation district" with a reference to "wetland buffer", prior to recording of the final plat plans. Staff recommends that the Development Review Board approve Final Plat application #SD-05-34, conditional upon the applicant making the above -mentioned revision. PLANNING COMMISSION d 15 July 19.97 page 10 South --Burlington Planninq Commission. 5. The final lat plans shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this__approval is null and void. The plans shall be si ned b� the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk rior to recording. Prior to recordin the final Plat Plans, the a pllicant shall submit a co of the surve lat in di ital format. The format of the digital information shall be_approved by the Citv Planner. - -- -- Mr. Dinkla e seconded. Motion asked unanimously. 7. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application of Wright & Morrissey/ Vermont Gas for a planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a new 38,428 sq. ft. building for general office use and a bank with drive -through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street: Mr. Vock outlined changes to the plan since preliminary approval. The drive -up situation has been improved. There is now a complete drive -through. They have also moved the entrance and have more green space near it. These changes resulted in the loss of 5 parking spaces, so the size of the building has been reduced. There will be more plantings in several areas. Regarding the bike path/sidewalk, Mr. Vock said they have met with the Couillards and City Manager. The Couillards are willing to allow the path to be shown on the overall site plan. They are asking for some language regarding liability. Mr. Vock felt the situation looks very promising. Mr. Dinklage asked whether the moving of the entrance satisfies the concern about sight lines. Mr. Weith said the City Engineer voiced no further concerns. Mr. O'Rourke asked if anything can be done t-o-prevent 4-foot high lighted letters on top of the building. Mr.. Burgess said the Planning Commission doesn't control that. Mr. O'Rourke noted one very unattractive building that has done this and said it would be something to be looked at in the future. Mr. Dome asked whether there can be a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees on the southern boundary. The applicant had no problem with this. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Plannin Commission a rove the final plat a lication of Wright & Morrissey, Inc, for a planned unit devel- opment consisting_of the_existinq Vermont Gas building and a new PLANNING COMMISSION 15 JULY 1997 page 11 38,428 s ft. buildin for eneral of-fice use and a bank with drive throu h service, 69 and 85 Swift Street, as de icted on a 12 page set of lans, page two entitled "Swift Street P.U.D. Pr,operty of Daniel Morris se & Vermont Gas South Burl in ton, Ver- mont," re ared by Civil Engineering Associates, In_c__,__da_ted__Ju_ne__, 1997, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous a2provals and stipulations which are not super- seded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to issuance of a zonin ermit for the office buildin , all appropriate le al documents (e. irrevocable offer of ded- ication and warrant deed for the street widenin edestrian im rovements) shall be submitted to the Cit Attorne for aj2prQval,and recorded in the South Burlin ton Land Records. 3. The applicant shall construct a 10 foot wide sidewalk/recrea- tion _path along that portion of the project's f_r_onta e which does not currentl have a sidewalk recreation -]Rath,.._. This sidewalk recreation ath shall be continuous across the Couillard roperty with the appropriate legal documents or constructed within the existing Swift Street r.o.w. This sidewalk/recreation path shall be constructed prior to occu anc of the office building and to the specifications a roved b the Public Works Director. Prior_ to start of construction of the sidewalk recreation path, the applicantshall Rast a bond which covers the cost of the sidewalk recreation ath. 4. The plat lans shall be revised to show the Chan es listed below and shall re uire a roval of the Cit,y Planner. Three copies of the._ap2rpved revised plat plans shall be submitted to the, -City Planner prior. -to recording: a. The Tans shall be revised to show the sidewalk recreation ath constructed to the drivewa servin the Farrell Park. b. The landsca e lan shall be revised to rovide dense evergreen plantings along the southerly boundary _as,_required under Section 25.108 of the zonin re ulations. c. The Overall Site Plan shall be revised to indicate the amount of wetland.jmpa,cted_by the fill for the future internal access. d. The surve lat shall be revised to show the 8.25 foot strip along Swift Street to be reserved for future dedica- tion. 5. The proposed internal future access drive shall be constructed_ within three vears from the date of final approval. Prior to PLANNING COMMISSION 15 JULY 1997 page 12 issuance of a zoning permit, a_bond to cover the cost of the future_ access drive shall be posted and shall remain in effect until said future access drive is constructed. 6. Pursuant to Section 26:256(b) of the zonin re ulations, the Planning Commission approves a 3 7% parking waiver for the ro osed office buildin It is the Commission's o inion�that fewer s aces will adequately serve the ro'ect since a si nificant -portion of the gross s uare footageof the buildin will be devoted to uses which typically do not generate parking demand (e.a., stairwells). 7. Prior to issuance of a zonin permit,the applicant shall post a $28,500 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three ears to assure that the lan capinq takes root and has a ochance of surviving.. 8._All new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast li ht beyond the property line. An chan e in li(1itincr shall be a 2L2veq by the City Planner_prior to installation Details of any building mounted lights shall be approved by the City Planner prior to permit issuance. 9. For the _purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the proposed office b_uilding will generate 130.1 additional vehicle trip ends during the P. M._peak hour. 10. Pursuant to Section 25.113(c) of the zonin re ulations, the Planning Commission a proves a l6 foot height waiver for_the proposed office buildinq._�The _Commission _has determined that this taller structure: (i) will not affect adversely the essential character of the nei hborhood or district in which the_ ro ert is located; will not detract from the important scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other-ublic rights -of -way. 11 The Planning Commission grants an additional sewer allocation of 840 gpa__tal) for the new office/bank building. 12 The applicant shall record in the land records a "Notice of Condition" which clearly indicates that this project constitutes a PUD and that for zonin and subdivision ur oses the entire pro erty will be regarded as a single parcel of land. __This document shall regiire approval of the City 4Attorney _and shall be recorded prior -to recording the _final plat plans. 10 PLANNING COMMISSION 15 JULY 1997 page 13 13. An Chan e to the final lat Tans shall require._ approval of the Planninq Commission. 14. The final plat `plans _shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be si ned b the Planning_Commission Chair or Clerk rior to recordin Prior to recording the final_,plat, plans, the applicant shall submit a cop_y_of the survey_plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall be approved by the City Planner. Ms. Barone seconded. The -motion --then passed unanimousl 8. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat application of Francis J. Von Turkovich and Patricia A. Stratmann for subdivision of a 9.8 acre parcel into three lots approximately 1.9 acres, 2'.1 acres and 5.8 acres, 300 Swift Street: Mr. Burgess noted there is still outstanding information and asked if the Commission should hear the application. Mr. Weith felt it should but should continue it in order to get the infor- mation before making a decision. Mr. Burgess noted about a dozen items were asked for and were not provided. Mr. Von Turkovich said they tried to address the easement location. It has been shifted to the east across from the property across the road. This addresses the sight line problem. It will require getting permission to cut down a tree in the city r.o.w. The applicant would pay for it and relandscape the area. It will also require relocation of neighbor's mailboxes. There is also the issue of the status of the UVM right-of-way. The applicant is trying to get UVM to give up the current r.o.w and relocate it. There is no deal on this yet, and they don't know if it will ever happen. Mr. Heald explained that UVM has haying and access rights. Their property has another access. Mr. Von Turkovich said they have no plans for on -site septic system. Mr. Weith said the City Engineer recommends a gravity sewer line on Swift Street.to serve some of the lots. Mr. Von Turkovich said the problem is there is a drainageway-on Swift Street and it will be hard to get under that. Mr. Weith said the City Engineer looked at that and this was still his recommendation. Regardless of where the sewer goes, the plans will have to show the easements, etc. Mr. Dinklage said he had no problem showing the UVM driveway as it is now used (agricultural use only).with the option to come I o❑oo — oo� as k COMBINED DATA PARCELS A k 8 889 k p85 k rloe : 7 1 Area, Density and Dimensional Requirements: Proposed (w/ AllowablePropaeed R.O.W. Adjustment) I� Ninimum Lot Size: I nA nrr s,Il¢T 40.000 e.f. 283,575 9.1. 277,891 9 f. 1, Total Acreage: 4 Acres(PUD) 6.51 Acres 6.38 Acres / ,! IeNI,R Number of Lots: 2 2 O Ntlimum Lot Frontage: 350 feet 685 feet 685 feet Maximum Building Coverage: 30.0% 9.4% 9.6% MOXIn1Um Front Yard Coverage: 30.0% 35.6X0 27.9% LOCATION , Maximum Impervious Area: 70.0% 61.5%(Z 61.5% Type of Land Use: Commercial Office Building O Includes sidewalk improvements requested by the City of South Burlington. ® Includes future roadway and access improvements at 85 Swift Street. LOCATION MAP SCALE: 1' 2000 Q a Name"S` Reykrta✓ 40RECEIVED GYvrecrlDn Facllty ALL NECESSARY EASEMENTS FOR IT APR 15 2005 hE PROPaBEJ) SIDEWALK AND BKE°ATH ACROSS THE COUILLARD e.26• HPEVOCABLE OFFER OF PROPOSED WE PATH PROPERTY HAVE NOT BEEN OBTAINED DEDICATION ALONG SWIFT STREET n ran TO THE CITY OF SO BURUNGTON PROPERTY -lNE8P SIDEWALK City of So. Burlington TO BE DISOLVED AND BIKE PATH EXTEND EXISIMIO SIDEWALK TO ' MATCH EDGE OF PAVEAENT umn of wow F TR LIMITS OF T WORK i -- / FUTURE PROPOSED �\ � Ur f 5 IAPFiOJE.1EiT8 G� TE PARCEL ®o®cam ,C�^ FHOPCSED ,9 r00f (BeeG ev a. A" and l xrw,v Don Fc ; —J>/— MUTING CONTOURCO&Z ARD e # Poretl y Ararlssey n -339- PROPOSED CON TOUR L tEADW PROPERTY LINE O CON PIN +1� Au CILVERT W/ v CONC. MONUNENi { � FE8 NV-T7e6 -99- GRAVITY SEWER LINE • - W - WATER LINE _ w OVERHEAD ELECTRIC g Be o - GAS uNE 3 / r RO tI036 AG SEWER MANHOLE 141rmanf GinSyefern; i'r[. r � V STORM MANHOLE i � / � / ' / W •\ � � HYDRA 0 *ATER S ntER spur-aFF VALVE 'd OVERHEAD ELECTRIC PORE IFID ..mrnv rW MfNM1720 CE t ® !�� '!RF 4 Ape tl y GTa1 6A9N M LIGHT POLE SIGN srB V - DI CT EfaSPNG TREES:� , /VwvwYVY� EDGE OF BRUSH/WOODS Pwys .► —O O— ENSDNO FENCE OF '' 1 YETLAND IL, UF ___ \ Girl Po Mire ❑dI C Pbrl w+ ' L1aeJ�a A//7ta'/E� Porr/co Brno and � "' DoInofhy SOMA ,bonne \ � Ray7h and FLEAr6NG S-CA 0=6 C/fy o/ ARUZZA South BuY7nptan s-fsf SWIFT STREET P.U.D. SAY ADD WETLAND IMPACT. E%TEND SIDEWALW .11-7 SAY REVISED PROPOSED FUTURE ROADWAY 57! 69 & 85 SWIFT STREET GRAPHIC SCALE: OaFIV 11.1 SAY REVISED AS PER PRELIMINARY COMMENTS OVERALL SITE PLAN 1-1 SAY ADDED FUTURE ROADWAY r 1522E � Drawn Dote Chk'd Revision n ' 01 1` 9W� by MJ.N' _ Dote APRIL, 1997 SHEET IN FEET) EtP CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 1.rh - Ao rt. rpm Checked by � Scale 1" = 40' SHELBURNE, V'FRMONi Approved by SAY Project No. 97150 COMBINED DATA PARCELS A Ar B #69 k #55 Area, Density and Dimensional Requirements: Proposed (w/ Allowable Proposed R.O.W. Ad)uslment) Minimum Lot Size: 40.000 s.f. 283.575 s.f. 277,891 s.f. Total Acreage: 4 Acres(PUD) 6.51 Acres 6.38 Acres Number of Lots: — 2 2 Minimum Lot Frontage: 350 feet 685 feet 685 feet Maximum Buliding Coveroge: 30.OX 9,4R 9. 67C (UNCHANGED) Maximum Front Yard Coverage: 30.07E 35.GXCD 27.97E (UNCHANGED) Maximum Impervious Area: 70.07E 61.8%0 57.957E Type of Land Use: Commercial Office Building O Includes sidewalk improvements requested by the City of South Burlington. ® Includes future roadway and access improvements at 85 Swift Street. NarthsAwt Regro,a✓ car a- Foerity ALL NECESSARY EASEMENTS FOR IST. wx THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK AND BIKEPATH ACROSS THE COIAL.LARD 1125 IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF PROPERTY HAVE NOT BEEN OBTAINED w. rnl .man ( 1 DEDICATION ALONG SWIFT STREET TO THE CITY OF So. Bui-WGTON PROPERTY LIES PROPOSED SCEWALX TO BE DI90LVED AND BKE PATH T 1 _ - m, . • W e - . LIMITS OF wawc .. _ — — T m' OF TR T�-- PROPOB® BIKE PATH lid SCALE: 1 RECEIVE® APR 15 City of So. Burlington - �EXTEND EXISTNG SIDEWALK TO TCH EDGE OF PAVEkENT - - - — J _ r—� r I 1 �•Jf � I a i I I I I l II l 4� �.. t' 1�1 1; \\ `�, •1111 % / PARCEL B #85 -ok 1 \'\ 1 It 1 1 1 f �/ It f I II I d!= ` _ G I-- 2� LEGENI I I ` carve v`a �^ --- - and EXISTING CONTOUR - - r.1) ( i CYXNLLARD \� �` I 1 II 1 11 11 I a�' esw.✓ p r/ I McvrbeeY \� I \\ \\\ i "I— PROPOSED CONTTwR PROPERTY LIKE T 1II IIIIf- _-___I`__/____I_�r■R -1�I--� jI1III s;-�+: Jl`♦1Ii • '� �.I�II, III � 1, I II/ 1 /I /II//\ �/ IR\A1Rc/im s�1^s_v��^.d.v'.�I .-.- —j/, Ie y�_,.y r'"�I \ II1I`II1�II1II �I1 f 11 1r/1 '1'11 t I'�'/ O/ / \\ \�/ '�.I'r7P,Y^^ HY'M17'*}1T-d�' 11 Gal $�1NnJ.nc hAa I11 �• \ \ \ y IRON PINCONC. MONUMENj® 7-jill� 'hL iE OVERHEAD ELECTRICIN WATER LINE -SS— GRAVITY SEWER LINEG GAS LINE 7 t\ \ I \ 1II SEWER MANHOLE ® STORM MANHOLE ■■ I I I ),+��,� _ �E HYDRANT I 11 ...... e WATER $HUT OFF VALVE 1 OVERHEAD ELECTRIC POLE I^ [✓ rwy c.Pw I �I \ ``_ �\ `- _ ^ ^'Il�fr�.\ ® CATCH BASH M LIGHT POLE I IWI��RyTe �yA moo_ SIGN l I 1 V DI T p,wmmv ro•+1 \ ` `` \\ - 11 w`�\ / i• I O IB ® EXISTING TREES i f ( I l f I \ •t 1 \ I 7C _ = 7C /WOODS ` I II I l / \ LanJ M.MJ 1 ivwvvvvv,n EDs[ a BRUSH L- — J L — J--h / I \ -O O- a1■1e■ FENCE or I _- - __ \ / II �II I I l t \ ` �� L J �`I�alie�C J �1■� /---------- .-.- WMA1D 11j1 \ E� I / I +\ C-'a i till Ar - I card, T M/lt #ZL Pohntaa Lb•i n arid Bo�Q91'A ,.bonne :��o an0 Dorothy \ RbjMr FLEAb•NC -WEA I°ii'gae Lyty o/ ARUM \ South &Wfogtan '-'"� SAY ALA ' P"cLLa SWIFT STREET P.U.D. \ I-T-oe SAY ADDED SIDEWALK, UTILITY PADS a SAY ADD WEILAND IMPACT, EYTEND SIDEWALK 57, 69 do 85 SWIFT STREET GRAPHIC SCALE SAV REVISED PROPOSED NTURE ROADWAY OVERALL SITE PLAN A! N A Ie-aT SAV REVISED AS PER PRELIMINARY COMMENTS Date Ch'k'd Revision ITH JURI IN T N aM Ni 7A, CPISTER�" Drawn by MOW' Date APRIL, 1997 SHEET ( IN r'EET) .S� ,' CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 1 inch - 40 ft . aR.L f Checked by 1P Scale 1" a 40 1 SHELBURNE, VERMONT 1 Approved by SAV Pro)at No. 97150 - CITY OF SOUTH BU1t�',LINGTO TAT DEPARTMENT OF PLAI-WING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 28, 2005 Charles Jennings 45 Swift Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4lo6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. DEPARTMENT OF PLA1NNEIiG & ZOP 24C 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMOYF 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 28, 2005 Easy Self Storage LLC 61 South Willard Street Burlington, VT 05401 Dear Property Owner: Enclosed is a copy of a public notice published in Seven Days. It includes an application for development on property located near your property. This is being sent to you to make you aware that a public hearing is being held regarding the proposed development. If you would like to know more about the proposed development, you may call this office at 846-4io6, stop by during regular office hours, or attend the schedule public hearing. Sincerely, Tdq Betsy McDonough Administrative Assistant Encl. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOP- MENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, May 17, 2005, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1. Application #CU-05-07 of Joel S. Clements for conditional use approval under Section 14.10, Conditional Use Review, of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Request is for permission to allow a 6' x 32' porch to encroach 15 feet into the front setback, 24 Maryland Street. ` 2. Application #CU-05-08 of Paul & Ellen Gittetsohn for condition- al use approval under Section 14.10, Conditional Use Review, of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations. Request is for permission to increase the size of the foot print of an existing single family dwelling by 540 sq. ft., 5 Pleasant Avenue. 3. Final plat application #SD-05 ' 34 of Daniel Morrissey to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas build- ing and a 38,428 sq. ft. building r for general office use and a bank with drive -through service. The amendment consists of eliminat- ing the proposed internal access road connecting 69 Swift Street and 85 Swift Street. 4. Preliminary plat application #SD-05-32 and final plat appli- cation #SD-05-33 of Northfield Savings Bank for a planned unit development consisting of: 1) razing a 1307 sq. ft. service sta- tion and car wash building with four (4) fueling positions, and 2) constructing a 2500 sq. ft drive-in bank, 1143 Williston Road. 5. Motion and Request to Reconsider Findings of Fad and Decision of South Vitlage Communities, LLC regarding Master Plan Application #MP-04- 01 for: 1) 334 residential units, and 2) a 100 student education- al facility, and 3) a 35 acre com- munity supported farm, 1840 Spear Street. 6. Preliminary plat application #SD-05-36 of University Mall Realty Trust to amend a previ- ously approved planned unit development consisting of 675,115 sq. ft. GFA shopping center complex with 614,338 sq. ft. of GLA. The amendment con- sists of: 1) razing an existing single family dwelling, and 2) constructing a 2624 sq. ft. retail store, 155 Dorset Street. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John Dinktage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board April 27, 2005 �� F ` 'f) 1—A Permit Number SD- (�,, -/ CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the plans will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. 1) OWNER OF RECORD (Name as shown on deed, mailing address, phone and fax #) Daniel B. Morrissey (69 Farrell); Vermont Gas Systems 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (Book and page #) Warranty Deed Volume 418, Pages 22-23 (11/24/97); Volume 417, Pages 314-316 & 320-323 (10/30/97); Corrective Warranty Deed Volume 427, Pages 22-23 (4/24/98 3) APPLICANT (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Daniel Morrissey @ Wright & Morrissey, Inc.; 863-4541 phone; 802 865-1253 fax 99 Swift Street, Suite 100; South Burlington, VT 05403 4) CONTACT PERSON (Name, mailing address, phone and fax #) Paul M. Boisvert @ Civil Engineering Associates, Inc.; 985-2323 phone, 985-2271 fax P.O. Box 485; Shelburne, VT 05482 Swift Street P.U.D. APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT AMENDMENT Page 1 of 1 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS 69, and 85 Swift Street 6) TAX PARCEL ID # (can be obtained at Assessor?s Office) 1700-00069, 1700-00085 7) DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION a) Existing uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use) The PUD includes two lots. One 38,428 sf general office building and associated parking is located at 69 Swift Street. The second lot, at 85 Swift Street includes the existing Vermont Gas building and parking lot. b) Proposed uses on property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain) No changes to current uses are proposed. Amendment of the prior approval is being requested to remove the requirement for an access drive linking the 69 and 85 Swift Street parcels. c) Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings and existing uuuuings to remain) Building footprint at 69 Swift to remain unchanged at 7,350 sf. Building footprint at 85 Swift Street to remain unchanged at 16,680 sf. d) Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement and mezzanine) No changes proposed to existing buildings. e) Number of residential units (if applicable, new units and existing units to remain) No changes proposed to existing buildings. Swift Street P.U.D. APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT AMENDMENT Page 2 of 2 f) Number of employees & company vehicles (existing and proposed, note office versus non -office employees) No changes of use or scale are proposed. g) Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if Overlay Districts are applicable) Construction of the connector road requires impacts within the Conservation District. h) List any changes to the subdivision, such as property lines, number of units, lot mergers, etc. The lot at 57 Swift Street was divided during previous plat revisions, with a portion incorporated in the 69 Swift Street lot. 8) WETLAND INFORMATION a) Are there any wetlands (Class I, II, or III) on the subject property? A previously delineated wetland is located west of the Vermont Gas parcel. b) If yes, is the proposed development encroaching into any of these wetlands or their associated 50? buffers? T he wetlailu ai lU buf ier NVVUIU VU 1111pacteU by cVi IstrUkAiU11 Vf ti'e con lector r oau. Removal of the requirement to build this road would eliminate those impacts. c) If yes, this project MUST be reviewed by the Natural Resources Committee prior to review by the Development Review Board. Please submit the following with this application: 1. a site specific wetland delineation of the entire property or a written statement that the applicant is relying on the City?s Wetlands Map. 2. response to the criteria outlined in Section 12.02(E) of the Land Development Regulations (applicant is strongly encouraged to have a wetland expert respond to these criteria). Swift Street P.U.D. APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT AMENDMENT Page 3 of 3 9) LOT COVERAGE (ALL information MUST be provided here, even if no change is proposed) a) Size of Parcel: P.U.D. total 6.38 AC (with prior sidewalk and rec. path adjustment b) Building Coverage: Existing 24,030 square feet 9.6 % Proposed 24,030 square feet 9.6 % c) Overall Coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc): Existing 171,737 square feet 61.8% (as currently approved) Proposed 163,252 square feet 58.75 % d) Front Yard Coverage(s) (commercial projects only): Existing square feet 27.9 % (as currently approved) Proposed square feet 27.9 % (unchanged) 10) WAIVERS REQUESTED a) List any waivers from the strict standards in the Land Development Regulations (e.g., setbacks, height, parking, etc.) that the applicant is seeking IVV IMM WalverJ are UGlnq requesteU. 11) COST ESTIMATES a) Building (including interior renovations) $ 0.00 b) Landscaping (see Section 13.06(G) of the Land Development Regulations) $0.00 c) Other site improvements (please list with cost) No site improvements are currently proposed. Swift Street P.U.D. APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT AMENDMENT Page 4 of 4 12) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC a) Average daily traffic for entire property (in and out) No changes to traffic volume are proposed. b) A.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out) c) P.M. Peak hour for entire property (In and out) 13) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION No changes to use or operations are proposed with this request for amendment. 14) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION No changes to use or operations are proposed with this request for amendment. 15) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE No new work is proposed. 16) PLANS AND FEE 1"11 L_11 L_ L�_:11_J L:�L L......� LLB 1�....... }:.�..� 1'..}�� r XL-:�'} A }}.., ��.�A Plat plans shall be suui niueu which I shows the inivi i i ratio i listed of i CAI MAL r% at leu. Five (5) regular size copies and one reduced copy (11" x 17") of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time of submitting the final plat application (see Exhibit A). I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and i"/ ccurate to the best of my knowledge. 'SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT X � SIGNATURE OF CO -AP (CANT Swift Street P.U.D. APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT AMENDMENT Page 5 of 5 SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY ER SIGNATURE OF PROP T(Y OWNER lJa., Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this preliminary plat application and find it to be: Jcomplete Incomplete Director of Planning & Zoning or Designee Date a Swift Street P.U.D. APPLICATION FOR FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT AMENDMENT Page 6 of 6 Adjoiner List for Swift Street P.U.D_ 2/3/05 1700-00045 Jennings, Charles E. 45 Swift Street South Burlington, VT 05407 1700-00046 Easy Self Storage, LLC 1700-00059 61 South Willard Street Burlington, VT 05407 1700-56-58 Booska, Adam J. Loiselle, Lyn S. 8432 Firewheel Drive Frisco, TX 75034 1700-64-66 Booska, Colleen M. 64 Swift Street South Burlington, VT 05403 1700-00069 North Country Federal Credit Union 69 Swift Street, Condo Unit 1&2 South Burlington, VT 05407 1700-00069.002 Morrissey, Daniel B. P.O. Box 421 Burlington, VT 05407 Applicant 1700-00070 Kenny, James C. C/O Apple Tree Bay Property P.O. Box 3009 Burlington, VT 05401 1700-00079 Couillard, Jerry Couillard, Martha Gayle 216 Scribner Road East Calais, VT 05650 1700-00085 Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. P.O. Box 467 Burlington, VT 05407 Co -Applicant 45 Swift Street 46, 59 Swift Street 56, 58 Swift Street 64, 66 Swift Street 69 Swift Street 69 Swift Street Condo Unit 3&4 70 Swift Street 79 Swift Street 85 Swift Street 1700-00099 Nintety-Nine Swift Street Associates, LLC P.O. Box 421 99 Swift Street Burlington, VT 05407 0670-00007 Chittenden County Correctional Center 7 Farrell Street Vermont Department of Corrections 103 South Main Street Waterbury, Vermont 05671-1101 0670-00010 Ten Farrell Street Corp. 10 Farrell Street 431 Pine Street South Burlington, VT 05407 1050-00014 Mitchell, Carolyn A. 14 Lindenwood Dr. 14 Lindenwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 1050-00016 Austin, Patricia A. 16 Lindenwood Dr. 16 Lindenwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 1050-00018 Shea, Brian M. & Jenne R. 18 Lindenwood Dr. 18 Lindenwood Drive South Burlington, VT 05403 928 Falls Road P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Mr. Ray Belair Planning & Zoning City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 March 4, 2005 Phone: 802-985-2323 Fax: 802-985-2271 E-Mail: mail@cea-vt.com Re: Swift Street PUD (57,69 and 85 Swift Street) -Amendment to Final Plat Dear Ray: As you are aware, the Swift Street PUD was originally approved in July of 1997 for the Vermont Gas building, and the construction of a general office building and a bank with drive-thru services. As part of the approval, an internal access drive was required to connect 69 Swift Street and 85 Swift Street. The approval conditions required that the drive be constructed within three years of the initial approval. In February of 2000, a 3-year extension was granted for the construction of this access drive. At the time of the original approval, it appeare4 that Vermont Gas would be relocating their 85 Swift facility, which would allow for the redevelopment of this parcel and the interconnection (access drive) between the two properties would then be beneficial. Since that time, Vermont Gas has changed their position on relocating and, more importantly, the need for protecting our streams and brooks by improving our stormwater discharge to these receiving drainageways (especially impaired waterways such as the Potash Brook), has become a high priority for the City of So. Burlington. If constructed, the access road as designed would provide very limited benefit to the Swift Street traffic circulation, while potentially compromising a very sensitive watershed area and treatment area to the Potash Brook that presently exists within the alignment of the access drive on the Vermont Gas property. Therefore, we respectfully request that the original PUD approval be modified to eliminate the requirement of constructing an internal access drive (and associated improvements) between 69 Swift Street and 85 Swift Street. There may come a day when the redevelopment of this area creates a situation where the internal circulation would be greatly beneficial. However, at this point the potential negative impacts far outweigh the potential benefits. -� SAV:pao CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT Off' PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 May 12, 2005 Daniel B. Morrissey 69 Farrell St. S. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: 69 & 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Morrissey: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and staff comments to the Board. Please be sure that someone is at the meeting on Tuesday, May 17, 2005 at 7:30 p.m. at the City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street. If you have any questions, please give us a call. Sincerely, Betsy onough Administrative Assistant Encl. J CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 May 18, 2005 Paul Boisvert Steve Vock Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. PO Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Re: 69 & 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Boisvert & Mr. Vock: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision of the above referenced project approved by the South Burlington Development Review Board on May 17, 2005 (effective 5/17/05). Please note the conditions of approval, including that the amended final plat plans must be recorded in the land records within 90 days (must be submitted by 8/15/05) of this approval or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Be sy McD nough, AdministratkvjAssistant Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL - #7003 3110 0001 3598 6098 I 4 51601W 5-a-05 SIGN IN SHEET MEETING. DATE: mp,v-,kr IA w t it, t I — .jjenv-i j� zi; o I " d1ft. T' S- InvAll IfL 4tK 'let, DONBWM DATA PARMS A dt 8 059 dt P5 Area Density and Oimenslonol ReWbrements: Proposed (w/ Allowable Promo R.O.W. Ad)uelm—t) Minimum Lot Size: 40.000 s.f. 28.1575 &C 277.891 s.f. Totd Acreage: 4 AAres(Pt1D) 6,51 Acres 6.38 A -- Number of Lots 2 2 Minl—" Lot Frontoge: 350 feet 665 feet 685 feel Moximum BuBding Coverage: 30.0% 9.4% 9.6% Moxt— Front Yord Coveroge: 30.0% 35.6%M 27.9% Maxknum knpervlous Area: 70.0% 61.8X4z 61.87 Type of Land use: com Cld Office oundfng 0 Includes sidewalk knprovernents requested by the City of South Burlington (Z Indudes future roadway and access Improvements at 85 Swift Street. 1 uwls of - \�— WORK — —SS-- HYRAMTY Sn" the — —w -_ E - p4AE'M F1fLlr SEIKR YNHOIE )fYOQMiT 1 e YW" 9 T-0 VALE T v. 0%43*EAD E1fCAi1C PCIE ' I � 1 « r»tT San some E eSTYIa TPrs i rv-rw-rvw,� [nar or aa>�/r000s l E Tw ROCE LM ,5 of tardy, Aa7 MM �thy ftEVAVG PatrkO BP094A Note (6-8-00): Including the proposed sidewalk and utility] pads the Impervious area changed from 61.5% to 6+.= ALL iGC£9BAJTf EA98019M FM - Re MOFIDO U 6DEWMA AND 0"3'ATH ACnOBB T1-E C011l_ATD rr,Df tfY HAVE WTI OWAPM — —P C _ Ili 41' Ili I 1I I / i 1AC i J ; JON 2 aOQ. 'i {uj it Of LOCATION MAP 4 city of So. Bu gton SCNE , = 2000' I� AH71-ffiM t RsgAavd Corawob- Foaty 1 1 i -- Ur F11EYOa4BtE 0"13%OF DEMAI10N A1A140 9AFT 6R{�r I } PRDP0eED8M PATH RY TO THE COF 90. 17.111IMON worms � , L,41 ( EMMM EIDEWAU TO ANKH EDGE OF PM13C P - ----- -- - - --- - - - Nil t llllrrrs ���r�ru�oai londri�o >a..�, �i btD I ' 1 I I I 1 I 1 \ 1�' f -Nroliot Cam] iDAerA �.r - �J _J PFtoFae® I AND UTILITY PADO ]c--Dt -- . nA. t_ I Savth d""hgte" .� GRAPMC SCALE i(1M PYi ) 11m6 40 R City oA South B 4*vlan Ci'fiE A A • /szx sY�e 1-YO SAY ADDED SOEWAX. 1rAVTY PADS e-as� SAV ADD w[nAEo AA'ACt, EXTCIq soEYwx �- SAV M\010 PROPOSD f1111. 1111.1 SAV REMSED AS PM PRUAWWY COM"M r1�T UV ADDED FURM 940 M Y Dot. k'd Revtr D— by Jam- Chked by _ p oc Approved by -SA�y_ Date APPoL 1997 Scale 1* - w' Pro)ect No. 97150 -- SWIFT STREET P.U.D. 57, 69 do 85 SWIFT STREET OVERALL SITE PLAID SNG=T GVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, ING. S7*Ul LJRNE. VFFl1(MT CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 September 20, 2005 Zurich North American Surety 3910 Keswick Road Baltimore, MD 21211 Attn: Surety Service Center Re: Bond No. LPM0009966 Dear Sir/Madam: Please be advised that I am in receipt of your Notice of Cancellation for the above referenced bond. Officer U Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland Surety Service Center, 3910 Keswick Road, Baltimore, MD 21211 YW4 Bond No. LPM0009966 NOTICE OF CANCELLATION Date: SEPTEMBER 6, 2005 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 The undersigned Surety upon a certain Bond in your favor as follows: Principal: Wright & Morrissey, Inc. Bond No: LPM0009966 License No: Amount of Coverage: S 75,000.00 Effective Date: 02/04/2005 hereby notifies you that it desires to cancel and does hereby cancel said bond as an entirety. Such cancellation to become effective at Thirty (30) days from receipt of this letter. It shall be presumed that you receive this letter within five (5) days of this notice. Please send written confirmation of this notice to the address below. This notice is given to you in accordance with the cancellation provision contained in said bond. By: THEODORE G. MARTI , Attorney -in -Fact Zurich North America Surety formerly Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland 3910 Keswick Road Baltimore, Maryland 21211 Attention: Surety Service Center CC: HICKOK & BOARDMAN, INC. PO BOX 1064 BURLINGTON VT 054021064 Wright & Morrissey, Inc. P. O. BOX 421 BURLINGTON VT 05402 LPM90002 Ed.(07/03) South Burlington Stormwater Services 575 Dorset Street • South Burlington, VT- 05403 Tel: (802) 658-7961 • Fax: (802) 658-7976 July 24, 2007 Jeffrey Olesky, P.E. Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. 928 Falls Road PO Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 RE: Vermont Gas Systems, Parking Lot Extension Dear Jeff, Office Dept. of Public Works 104 Landfill Road I have reviewed the materials you sent to me regarding the Vermont Gas Systems parking lot extension located at 85 Swift Street in South Burlington. After reviewing the site plan, I have no additional comments for this project. Please ensure that appropriate erosion prevention and sediment control measures are installed and maintained throughout construction, and that they stay in place until the area is stabilized. Thank you for the chance to comment on this project. If you have any further questions, I can be reached at (802)658-7961 x108. Sincerely, /�/` Thomas J. DiPietro Jr. Stormwater Superintendent CC: Cathy Larose, South Burlington Planning and Zoning CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 August 2, 2000 John S. Pifer Vermont Gas P.O. Box 467 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Final Plat Application of Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. Dear Mr. Pifer: Enclosed please find a copy of Finding of Facts of the Development Review Board meeting on July 11, 2000 (effective date August 1, 2000) as well as a copy of the minutes of this meeting. Please note the conditions of approval, including that the final plat plan be recorded in land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Planning & Zoning Assistant Enclosures DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 11 JULY 2000 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The sprinkler system shall be extended to serve the new addition. 3. Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 4. The final plat plan (sheet SP1) shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 8. Public Hearing: Final Plat application #SD-00-33 of Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a 38,428 sq. ft. building for general office use and a bank with drive -through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street. The amendment consists of the installation of a 30kW electrical generator (Capstone Micoturbine) and sidewalk, 85 Swift Street: Mr. Piper said the unit in question is the size of a large refrigerator. Mr. Dinklage asked about noise from the unit. Mr. Piper said that the ones in Burlington are much larger. He said there is a 65dba noise output, similar to a residential air conditioning unit. He added that you can hold a conversation standing next to it. He did not anticipate any noise issues. Ms. Quimby moved the Development Review Board approve final plat application #SD-00-33 of Vermont Gas Systems, Inc, to amend a planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a 38,428 sq. ft. building for general office use and a bank with drive -through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street. The amendment consists of. 1) installing a 30kW generator (Capstone Micoturbine), and 2) installation of a sidewalk, as depicted on a one page set of plans entitled "Swift Street P.U.D. 57, 69, & 85 Swift Street, Overall Site Plan," by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., dated April 1997, last revised on 6/7/00, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 11 JULY 2000 2. Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 3. The final plat plan (sheet SP1) shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Mr. Farley seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 10. Public Hearing: Conditional Use application #CU-00-15 of Chase Properties and Development, LTD seeking conditional use approval from Section 25.05, Conditional Uses, and Section 26.65, Multiple Structures and Uses on Lots, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to allow light manufacturing use in conjunction with warehousing, storage and distribution use, 5 Green Tree Drive: and 11. Site plan application SP-00-28 of Chase Properties to construct a 20,160 sq. ft. warehouse and light manufacturing building, 5 Green Tree Drive: Mr. Rowe said this is currently a vacant lot. Existing buildings in the area have multiple tenants. There is a landscaped berm along the westerly side of the lot. The applicant will increase the amount of landscaping there even though they will be encroaching into the area with their loading docks. Regarding the building -mounted light fixture, Mr. Rowe felt landscaping will shield the lights. They are downcasting and cut off. The applicant is proposing 13 ft. wide access drives on both sides of the building. It would be one way on each side. Staff has recommended the drives be 18 feet. The applicant would prefer to have the two curb cuts remain 2-way curb cuts. Mr. Rowe noted that the regulations say that if there are two cuts, each should be one way. Mr. Belair said staff recommends one-way curb cuts, with ingress only at the northerly cut. He noted that trucks will use them that way, and there is no reason cars can't as well. Mr. Dinklage asked if there has been any response from neighbors about lighting. Mr. Belair said neighbors were notified but did not respond. He added that if there is a problem, the Board can require the applicant to use alternative lights. Mr. Roth asked about limiting the hours of operation. Mr. Rowe said he would anticipate C © p 7/I1/00 �V MOTION OF APPROVAL VERMONT GAS COMPANY I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve final plat application #SD-00-33 of Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. to amend a planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a 38,428 square foot building for general office use and a bank with drive -through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street. The amendment consists of: 1) installing a 30kW generator (Capstone Micoturbine), and 2) installation of a sidewalk, as depicted on a one page set of plans entitled " Swift Street P.U.D. 57, 69, & 85 Swift Street, Overall Site Plan" by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., dated April 1997, last revised on 6/7/00, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval by the South Burlington Development Review Board. 3. The final plat plan (sheet SPl) shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plan shall be signed by the Board Chair or Clerk prior to recording. n H&de Dr. ­rr ,.. LLISTON� rig Sale it. lam- 1 mile uth of T ners on e. 2 take .n left on uthridge Rd. to #382. LLISTON Mufti family rage sale. Computer 'printer computer mes, tovs, clothing, vsehold & yard items ne 24 & 25. 9-4. organ Pkwy & Gallop . Off File 2A LLISTON Neighbor- ed sale. Lamplite Acres 3rownelf Rd. June th & 25th; 8:30 on. WILLISTON Sat-9-4. Community wn Sale. Pinecrest Vil- le. Over 85 homes. 1st ht after driving range, yards Williston Village. u rr tr s7 W ILLISTON Sat June 24, 8:30 468 Bittersweet Circle LISTON Terry Lane le. Fri. & Sat. 9am- m. Glassware, crystal, Ils, !awn sweeper, my mist. items. WINOOSKI 5 Families Saturday 8:00 - 2:00 Is clothes & toys, furni- e, small appliances, ex- rsice equipment, ithes, womens plus as, air hockey table, albums, silver, lots of vsehold items. Main set in Winooksi to La- )ntain St., 2nd right to Niquette Court. IOOSKI & 6/24, 9-4, y wide tag sale. Pick up ip of participating resi- nts at Chuck's Mobil or y Hell. Lots of neat ms from baby items to aquas. 14-MGKI _Multi family ve-way sale. Sat & n 10-6. Luggage set, wing machine, small pliances, dishes, cloth- i, & odds &ends. Shepherd St. OOOSKI Retirement rage sale! Years of faction, must sell ev- dhingg, Fri & Sat, 9- m. 30 Bemard St. WINOOSKI Sat. 8am-4pm. Cedar St. Household ms, furniture, toys. IOOSKI Sat. & Sun. m-5pm. Hand tools, welder [225 amps], ,000 BTU Reddy ater, nails & bolts. tSONALS 6 ABORTION? WHY? ONSIDER ADOPTION Warm. secure, loving me available for new- rn baby. Please call at- Tiey at -800-606-4411. A-750 OPTION A call to us is at we pray ior! We are loving couple, longing share our hearts and me with a caucasian wbom or twins. All ad- ntages life has to offer, II any time, Melissa d Ron at 100-871-7190. OPTION House full of fighter, FT mom, ro- antic couple, long to opt & share their toy- 1 home w/ a baby. penses paid. Call elect Dan & Barb 16]312-2993. OPT We'll offer you mpassion and give fir baby a lifetime of ie. Expenses paid. case call Irene & orge 1-800-278-1743 !SE A goose has re- ned to the gaggle. at to discuss cases of urn. Meadowbrook .Inv nrivp sn Ri,.- Lena wni oe uve Tor pic- ture signing 654-3651 LEGAL r ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS City of Burlington Public Works Dept. 33 Kilburn St. Burlington, VT 05401 Sealed BID for the construction of the 2000 Street Proaram for As- phalt Recycling, Asphalt Grinding, Bituminous Finish & Wearing Course Replacement and Structure Adjust- ment, Contract# 2000-2, will be received by the City of Burlington, Ver- mont, at the office of City Engineer, 33 Kilburn Street, P.O. Box 849, Burlington, Vermont 05402 until 1:DO p.m. (Daylight Savings Time] Friday, July 14, 2000 and then at said office pub- licly opened and read aloud. Approximately 5,- 400 tons of Wearing & Base Course Asphalt, 8,- 000 square yards of As- phalt Reclamation, 33,- 000 square yards of Asphalt Grinding and 235 Structure Adjustments are planned for Contract # 2000-2. Each BID must be ac- companied by a certified check payable to the OWNER for $5,000. A BID bond may be used in lieu of a certified check. Copies of the CON- TRACT DOCUMENTS may be examined or ob- tained at the office of the Public Works De- partment located at 33 Kilburn Street.. Burling- ton, Vermont, upon pay- ment of $50.00 for each set. A Pertormanoe Bond and a Payment Bond each in an amount equal to one hundred percent [100 %] of the contract price, will be required. Ir- revocable letters of Credit from an approved bank may be used in lieu of the Performance and Payment Bonds or cash in the amount equal to one hundred percent [100%] of the contract price at the approval of the City Engineer. This contract is sub- ect to the Burlington omen In Construction Trades Ordinance. No bid will be accepted with- out a signed statement of intent to comply with this ordinance. A pre -bid conference will be held on Thursday, July 6, 2000 at 10:00 a.m. at the Burlington Public Works Office, 33 Kilburn Street. All pro- spective bidders are en- couraged to attend. Any BIDDER, upon re- turning the contract doc- uments in good condition within 30 days after the actual date of BID open- ing, will be refunded their full payment, and any non -bidder upon so re- turning the CONTRACT DOCUMENTS will be re- funded $25.00. June 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 29, 30, 2000 BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR BIDS The Burlington Board of School Commissioners will receive sealed bids on or before, but no later than Friday, July 14 at 2:00 p.m. at Ira Allen Ad- ministration Center, 150 r..r..ti�.-.e. n.....,..,, o.. - tions shouid ybey clearly explained in writing. bid shall be withdj for a period of thirty days after the opening or the bids. June 21, 22, 23, 24, & 25, 2000 BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST FOR BIDS The Burlington School Department in associa- tion, with the Food Serv- ice Director's Associa- tion of Vermont, will receive sealed bids on or before, but no later than Friday, June 30, 2000 at 2:00 p.m. at Burlington High School Food Serv- ice Office, 52 Institute Road, Burlington, VT 05401 for groceries in- cluding dairy and non- food items. The sealed proposals will be opened at 2.00 p.m, on Friday, June 30th at the same address. Notlflca- tion of the award if any will be made no later than 30 days 4rom the date of opening. Please address proposals to the attention of Doug Davis and type on the envelope "SEALED PROPOSAL - GROCERIES". No faxed bids are accepted. Con- tact Doug Davis, Director of Food Services at [8021 864-8416 for further in- formation. The Burlington Board of School Commissioners reserves the right to re- ject any or all bids and to accept or reject any part of any bid, to waive any or all informalities or ir- regularities in the bid, and to accept the bid which in the sole judge- ment of the Burlington Board of School Com- missioners is most ad- vantageous to the Bur- lington School Department, even though it may not be the lowest priced bid. Any excep- tions to the bid specifica- tions should be clearly explained in writing. No bid shall be withdrawn for a period of thirty [301 days after the opening of the bids. June 22, 23, 24. 2000 NOTICE OF FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT AND NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST A RELEASE OF GRANT FUNDS City of Burlington City Hall Burlington, VT 05401 [802]865-7144 [TfY] Users-865-71421 Issued:6/24/00 Expires 7/10/00 These Notices shall sat- isfy two separate but re- lated procedural require- ments for activities to be undertaken by the City of Burlington. REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS On or about July 10, 2000, the City of Burling- ton will submit a request to the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban De- velopment [HUD] for the release of EDI [Special Purpose] funds under Ti- tle I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, to undertake a project knows as Down- town Redevelopment, for the purpose of building demolition, site clear- ance and site prepara- tion at 82-90 and 92-94 r,e miry or uunmgton certifies to HUD that the City of Burlington and Office of the Mayor con- sent to accepi the juris- diction of the Federal courts if an action is brought to enforce re- sponsibilities in relation to the environmental re- view process and that these responsibilities have been satisfied. HUD's approval of the certification satisfies its responsibilities under NEPA and related laws .and authorities, and al- lows the City of Burling- ton to use Program funds. OBJECTIONS TO RELEASE OF FUNDS HUD will consider objec- tions to its release of funds and the City of Burlington's certification for a period of fifteen days following the antici- pated submission date or its actual receipt of the request [whichever is later] only if they are on one of the following bases: [a] the certifica- tion was not executed by the Certifying Officer of the City of Burlington; [b] the City of Burlington has omitted a step or failed to make a decision or finding required by HUD regulations at 24 CFD Part 58; [c] the grant re- cipient has committed funds or incurred costs not authorized by 24 CFR Per 58 before ap- proval of a release of funds by HUD; or [d] an- other Federal agencyy acting pursuant to 40 CFR Part 1504 has sub- mitted a written finding that the project is unsat- isfactory from the stand- point of environmental quality. Objections must be prepared and submit- ted in accordance with the required procedures (24 CFR Part 58] and shall be addressed to HUD at'. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Developement, 275 Chestnut Street, Man- chester, New Hampshire 03101. Potential objec- tors should contact HUD to verify the actual last day of the objection pe- riod. This material is available in alternate formats for persons with disabilities. Peter Clavelle, Mayor City Hall Burlington, VT 05401 June 24, 2000 NOTICE The annual tax filing of the Green Mountain Fund for Popular Strug- gle, Inc., 10 Machia Hill Road, Westford, VT 05494, Ann Lipsitt, Presi- dent, is available for in- spection during regular office hours at Julow and Welton, 25 Pinecrest Dr. Essex Jct., VT. 05452, 878-2218. June 24, 2000 NOTICE "The Board of School Di- rectors of the South Bur- lington School District re- quest sealed bids for the following on or before the acceptance dates. Rubbish & Recycling Bic_ Friday, July 7, 2000 at 9:00 a.m. Bus Bid -Friday, July 7, 2000 at 11:00 a.m. For information and bid documents, contact the The South Burlingtop', [Development Review Board will hold a pugqlIlc hgaring at the South,Bur- lirtfgton City Hall Writer- ence Room, 5 Dorset Stree urlington, Vermont on Tuesday, July 11, 2000, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the fol- lowing; 1] Appeal #ZBA-99-30 o f John Larkin to overturn the Administrative Offi- cer's Notice of Violation dated June 30, 1999 that the appellant is in viola- tion of the zoning regula- tions for having con- structed a single family dwelling at 6 Pinnacle Drive which exceeds the 417.565 foot mean sea level elevation maximum allowed under Section 22.401 of the zoning reg- ulations. 21 Application #CU-00- 15 of Chase Properties and Development, LTD seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.05, Conditional Uses, and Section 26.65, Mufti - pie Structures and Uses on Lots, of the South Burlington Zoning Regu- lations. Request is for permission to allow light manufacturing use in conjunction with ware- housing, storage and distribution use, 5 Green Tree Drive. 31 Final plat application SD-00-W of Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. to amend a previously ap- proved planned unit de- velopment consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a 38, 426 square foot building for general office use and a bank with drive -through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street The amendment consists of the installa- tion of a 30kW electrical generator [Capstone Mi- coturbine] and sidewalk, 85 Swift Street. 41 Final plat application #SD-00-30 of Dorset Land Company to amend a planned unit develop- ment consisting of a 184 unit congregate housing facility and a 103 unit ex- tended stay hotel in two [2] buildings. The a m e In d - ment consists of: 11 add- ing one (11 hotel unit, and 21 constructing a 12' x 30' addition in place of a previously approved 9' x 32' addition, 401 and 415 Dorset Street. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board June 24, 2000 REQUEST FOR BIDS The Vermont State Hos- pital seeks a contractor to provide laundry serv- ices for the hospital. Laundry service must meet all standards of the Joint Commission on Ac- creditation of Hospitals. Please call 802-241-3005 for further information. June 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 2000 Vermont rags WE'LL STAND BY YOU. June 20, 2000 South Burlington Development and Review Board 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Development and Review Board: JtIN 1 9 2000 City Of S0. Burlington Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. at 85 Swift Street in South Burlington wishes to install a Capstone Microturbine at our office on Swift Street to demonstrate a new gas technology and reduce our utility cost. The Capstone Microturbine is capable of producing 30 kW of electricity using natural gas. It is intended to operate continuously and will generate approximately 50% of the electricity used by Vermont Gas Systems. Enclosed is information on the Capstone Microturbine for you review and consideration. We propose to locate the Capstone Microturbine outdoors on a new concrete pad to the west of our office building (see site plan). The proposed site is currently used to store top- soil. The Capstone Microturbine will be located behind an existing brick/block wall and will not be visible from Swift Street (see attached photograph). In addition, we propose to install a small section of sidewalk that will permit VGS staff and prospective clients to access the Capstone Microturbine easily from our back parking lot. No additions or changes to the existing Vermont Gas building are required to complete this project, except for wiring the Capstone Microturbine into the currently installed main electrical distribution panel. The Capstone Microturbine operates very quietly and the noise produced is equavelent to that generated by a residential sized air conditioner. The Capstone Microturbine also has very clean emissions. The project is expected to be complete within four weeks from receiving South Burlington Development Review Board approval. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the project or would like a tour of the Capstone Microturbine once it is operating. SPreS-Jfer Sales Engineer Attachments 802-863-4511 802-524-6559 P.O. Box 467, Burlington, VT 05402-0467 www.vermontgas.com P.O. Box 850, St. Albans, VT 04578-0850 85 Swift Street, South Burlington, VT 05403 N. Main Street Shopping Ctr., St. Albans, VT 05478 VGS Microturbine Project Gas FRo)uT ViFw OF ZUlc(- NQTAf- PP g ✓ls�r� I- RE Fzal` Capstone MicroTurbineTM System Fuel Supply Air Exhaust Fuel System MicroTurbine A A Communications Digital Power Controller User Interface Electrical 10- Output The Capstone MicroTurbineTI system is a compact, low emission, power generator providing electrical power up to 30kW. Solid-state power electronics allow grid -connect operation; stand-alone battery support and automat- ic grid/stand-alone switching are available options. The system incorporates a compressor, recuperator, combustor, turbine and permanent magnet generator. The rotating components are mounted on a single shaft, supported by patented air bearings that rotate at up to 96,000 RPM (full load). The generator is cooled by air flow into the gas turbine, thus eliminating the need for liq- uid cooling. System output is variable frequency (50/60 Hz) AC power. A non -recuperated model is also available. The Capstone MicroTurbineTm Generator Generator Cooling Fins Exhaust Air Intake General Compr bustion nber Injector CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION 6430 Independence Avenue, Woodland Hills, CA 91 367 Phone: 818.716.2929 Fax: 818.71 6.9910 www.capstoneturbine.com `MY(r . Capstone �')wo Features • 29 kW net aso conditions) • 400-480 VAC, 50/60 Hz 3-phase, 3-wire wye or 4-wire wye, or comer ground delta, 46A/phase max • Grid -connect or stand-alone • Internal fuel compression system • Patented air bearings • Digital power controller • Air cooled • Type 311 outdoor enclosure 30 S 25 J 20 9 v O GJ J Is SL Lu a 10 E 4, s 0 I Capstone MicroTurbineTM Benefits • Ultra -low emissions • Minimal maintenance • No liquid lubricants • No liquid coolants • Small footprint • Vibration -free • Quiet operation • MultiPac capable • Optional remote monitoring Inlet AirTemperature (deg C) 20 -a .10 -s 0 s 10 Is 20 25 30 35 40 45 s1 30 25 'd 20 3 5 -4 S 14 23 32 41 so 59 68 77 86 95 104 113 122 Inlet Air Temperature (deg F) Performance @ so or 60Hz Low pressure natural gas (15 psig) Low pressure natural gas (5 psig) Emissions: NOx Intake/Exhaust Fuel flow (natural gas-HHV) Exhaust gas temperature Total exhaust energy Full -Load Power 29 kW net (+/- 1) 28 kW net (+/- 1) <9 ppmV @ 15% Oz 440,000 kJ/hr (420,000 Btu/hr) 261 C / 500 F 305,000 kJ/hr (290,000 Btu/hr) Conformance. UL-Listed (UL 2200) ANSI C84.1 '/Af IEEE 519 NFPA 37 NFPA 54 NFPA 70 10 CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 100-95 1* OU� uSTEO Industrial, walk-in and open packaging options also available. Efficiency (LHV) Heat Rate (LHV) 26 % (+/- 2) 13,700 kJ (13,000 Btu) / kWh 26 % (+/- 2) 14,100 kJ (13,400 Btu) / kWh Dimensions H: 1900mm / 74.8" W: 714mm / 28.1" D: 1344mm / 52.9" Weight 490 kg / 1082 lb Add 173 kp/3801b for ption Typical Sound Level 65dBA@ 10m/33ft All specifications rated at full -load power Fuel compression system warranted for 5-15 psig operation. Fuel Heat Content: 26, 100 to 93,850 kf /Nm3 (700 to 2615 Btu/scf) HHV. Note:The manufacturer reserves the right to change or modify without notice, the design or equipment specifications without incurring any obligation either with respect to equipment previously sold or in the process of construction. CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION www.capstonetuebine.com PLANNING COMMISSION 15 July 1997 page 10 South Burlin ton Planning Commission. 5. The -final lat Plans shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days �or�this ap roval is null and void._ Tht._2 ans shall be sii ned_bythe�Planning Commission Chair or Clerk Prior to recording. Prior toyrecording the final Plat Plans, the applicant_ shall_ submit a�copy of the survey_plat in digital format. The format of -the digital information shall �be approved by�the_CityPlanner. Mr. Dinklage�seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 7. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application of Wright & Morrissey/ Vermont Gas for a planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a new 38,428 sq. ft. building for general office use and a bank with drive -through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street: Mr. Vock outlined changes to the plan since preliminary approval. The drive -up situation has been improved. There is now a complete drive -through. They have also moved the entrance and have more green space near it. These changes resulted in the loss of 5 parking spaces, so the size of the building has been reduced. There will be more plantings in several areas. Regarding the bike path/sidewalk, Mr. Vock said they have met with the Couillards and City Manager. The Couillards are willing to allow the path to be shown on the overall site plan. They are asking for some language regarding liability. Mr. Vock felt the situation looks very promising. Mr. Dinklage asked whether the moving of the entrance satisfies the concern about sight lines. Mr. Weith said the City Engineer voiced no further concerns. Mr. O'Rourke asked if anything can be done to prevent 4-foot high lighted letters on top of the building. Mr. Burgess said the Planning Commission doesn't control that. Mr. O'Rourke noted one very unattractive building that has done this and said it would be something to be looked at in the future. Mr. Dome asked whether there can be a mix of evergreen and deciduous trees on the southern boundary. The applicant had no problem with this. Mr. O'Rourke_ moved the_P_lanning Commission approve the fina_l_21a_t application of Wright & Morriss for for a planned unit devel- opment consistin of the existinq_Vermont�Gas buildin and a new PLANNING COMMISSION 15 JULY 1997 page 11 38,428 se ft._building_ _general office use and a bank with drive through service, 69�and 85 Swift Street, as�depicted on a 12 pageset of�olans, page two �entitled �"Swift Street P.U.D., Property of Daniel Morrissey & Vermont Gas South Burlington, Ver- mont," prepared�by_Civil Engineering�Associates, �Inc, dated June, 1997, with the followingstipulations: +� 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not super- seded this�approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the office building-, all appropriateylesal documents (e.grey_irrevocable'-offer of ded- ication and warrant deed for the street_ widening/pedestrian_ im_provements)shall be submitted to the Cit_y_Attorney for aooroval�and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records. 3. The _a plicant shall construct a 1.0foot wide sidewalk/recr_ea- tion path alons thatoortion of the ro�ect's�frontage which does not currently_have a sidewalk/recreation_Rath. This sidewalk/ recreation path shall�be continuous across the Couillard ropert_y with the appropriate legal documents or constructed within the existing_Swift Street�r.o.w. This sidewalk/recreation path shall_ be constructed prior to occupancy of the office building and to the specifications_approved__by_t_he Public Works Director. Prior to start of construction of the sidewalk/recreation Bath, the applicant shall posh a bond which covers the cost of the sidewalk/recreation path. 4. The plat plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of theCity Planner. Three copies of the +approved revised plat Mans _shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to recording: a. The plans shall be revised to show the sidewalk recreation oath constructed to the driveway serving the-Farrell_Park. b. The landscape plan shall be revised to provide dense evergreen_plantings along the southerly boundary as reQuired under Section 25.108 of the zoning_regulations.- _ c. The Overall Site Plan shall be revised to indicate the amount of wetland impacted by the fill for the future internal access. d. The survey plat shall be revised to show the 8.25 foot strip�aloo Swift Street to be reserved for future dedica- tion. 5. The proposed internal future access drive shall be constructed within three years from the date -of final_approvall.. Prior to PLANNING COMMISSION 15 JULY 1997 page 12 issuance of a zoning_permit,_a bond to cover the cost of the future y`access drive shall be osteedd�Ind �shall �remain is effect until vsaid�future �access �drive is constructed. 6. Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) of the zoning regulations, the_ Planning —Commission approves a 3.7� parking wawaiver for the proposed office building. It is the Com_mission's opinion that fewer spaces_will_adequateely serve the srole� ct since a significant�portion_of the gross square footage of the building will be devoted to uses which tvpically�do not enerate parking demand (eta.. stairwells). 7. Prior to issuance_ of a zoninq permit,_the applicant shal_l__post a $28,500�landsca e bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three years toassure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 8. All new exterior lightinq_shall consist of downcastinq shielded fixtures so as not to cast light_beyound the property line. Any_change�innlightinq_shall be ap roved by the City Planner prior to installation. Details of and buildinq_mounte_d_ lights shall�bbe._approved by_ the, City__Planner prior__to permit issuance.�� 9. For the purpose of ca_lculatinq_road_im_pa_ct__fees under the South�Burlin ton Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planninq__C_ommission estimates that thepro_po_sed office buildingwill generate 130.1 additional vehicle trip ends during the P. M. peak hour. 10. Pursuant to Section 25.113 Planning Commission approves a proposed office buildin__q_i�The this taller structure: c) of the zoning regulations, 16 foot height waiver for the Commission has determined tha (i) will not affect adversely the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the e rroperty is_located; (ii) will not detract from the important scenic views from_ adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of -way. 11. The Planning Commission rants an additional sewer allocation of 840 and (2,040 apd total) for the new office/bank building. 12. The applicant shall record in the land records a "Notice of Condition" which clearl_y_indicates that this project constitutes a_ PUD and that for zoning and subdivision ur oses the entire property will be regarded�as a,single parcel of land. This document shall require a2proval of the_City_Attorne�and shall be recorded criorto recording the final�pla� t plans. PLANNING COMMISSION 15 JULY 1997 page 13 13. An chanoe.to the final plat�lans�shall require approval of_ the Planning Commission. 14. The final lat_plans shall b within_ 90 days or this a proval shall be signed vby the Planninq_- to recording._Prior to recordin applicant shall submit a co_p_y__of format. The format of the digit by the Citv Planner. e recorded in the land records is nullandvoid._ The _plans Commission Chair or Clerk prior the final plat plans, the the surveyplat in digital al information shall be approve Ms. Barone seconded. The motion then passed unanimously. 8. Public Hearing: Preliminary Plat application of Francis J. Von Turkovich and Patricia A. Stratmann for subdivision of a 9.8 acre parcel into three lots approximately 1.9 acres, 2.1 acres and 5.8 acres, 300 Swift Street: Mr. Burgess noted there is still outstanding information and asked if the Commission should hear the application. Mr. Weith felt it should but should continue it in order to get the infor- mation before making a decision. Mr. Burgess noted about a dozen items were asked for and were not provided. Mr. Von Turkovich said they tried to address the easement location. It has been shifted to the east across from the property across the road. This addresses the sight line problem. It will require getting permission to cut down a tree in the city r.o.w. The applicant would pay for it and relandscape the area. It will also require relocation of neighbor's mailboxes. There is also the issue of the status of the UVM right-of-way. The applicant is trying to get UVM to give up the current r.o.w and relocate it. There is no deal on this yet, and they don't know if it will ever happen. Mr. Heald explained that UVM has haying and access rights. Their property has another access. Mr. Von Turkovich said they have no plans for on -site septic system. Mr. Weith said the City Engineer recommends a gravity sewer line on Swift Street to serve some of the lots. Mr. Von Turkovich said the problem is there is a drainageway on Swift Street and it will be hard to get under that. Mr. Weith said the City Engineer looked at that and this was still his recommendation. Regardless of where the sewer goes, the plans will have to show the easements, etc. Mr. Dinklage said he had no problem showing the UVM driveway as it is now used (agricultural use only) with the option to come CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 July 7, 2000 John S. Pifer Vermont Gas P.O. Box 467 South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Vermont Gas, Final Plat Application, Generator and Sidewalk, 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Pifer: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, July 11, 2000 at 7:30 p.m. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, 1 Raymond J. Belair, Administrative Officer RJB/mcp Encls DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO .➢ULY tl, 2000 iVtEETING Information provided by the appellant indicates that the maximum height of the house is 419.21 feet above mean sea level (see enclosed) or 1.645 feet higher than permitted. 8� DGRSET LAND COMPANY - AMENDMENT TO FINAL PLAT & DESIGN RIEVIIEW APPLICATION - HAWTHORN SUITE — 421 DORSET STREET The project consists of amending a final plat application of Dorset band Company, Inc. for a previously approved planned unit development consisting of a 184 unit congregate housing facility and a 104 unit extended stay hotel in two (2) buildings. The amendment consists of. 1) a expanding a previously approved 9' x 32' addition to main hotel building to be 12 feet by 30 feet in dimension, and 2) relocating the addition from the north side of the front entrance to the interior courtyard. This addition was previously approved by the Development Review Board on April 4, 2000 (minutes enclosed). The property located at 401 and 415 Dorset Street lies within the CD3 and R7 Districts. It is bounded on the east by Dorset Street, on the north by Aspen Drive, on the south by a GVW substation, and on the west by the congregate housing portion of the PUD. Design Review: The Development Review Board waived review by the Design Review Committee at the .tune 6, 2000 meeting (minutes enclosed). The proposed alterations will nullify previously approved elevations and keep the exterior facades visible to the public as they currently exist (approved previously by the DRC and the DRB). Coverage/setbacks. CD3 District (adjusted): wilding coverage is 25.7% (maximum allowed is 40%). Overall coverage is 47.4% (maximum allowed is 90%). Coverage in the R7 zoned portion of the PUD (congregate housing) will not change. Setback requirements are met. Sewer: No additional sewer allocation has been requested. Landscaping: The applicant has stated that the building costs will not change and therefore no new landscaping has been proposed. Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.): The F.A.R. for the area of the PUD zoned CD3 is unchanged at 0.63 (maximum allowed by the standard is .7). 9) VERMONT GAS, FINAIC.., PLAT _AMENDMENT, GENERATOR INSTALLATION, 85 SWIFT STREET This projects consists of amending a previously approved final plat application :flor a planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a 38,428 square foot building for general office use and a bank with drive -through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street as approved on July 15, 1997 (minutes enclosed). The amendment consists of 1) installing a 30kW generator (Capstone 1Micoturbine), and 2) installation of a sidewalk. These properties are located at 69 and 85 Swift Street lie within the C1 District. They are hounded on the east by the access to Farrell Park, on the north by Swift Street and an auto 3 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD MEMO JULY 11, 2000 MEETING body repair shop, on the south by Farrell Park, and several residences, and on the west by a mini -warehouse complex. Coverage/Setbacks: Entire P.U. D. after r.o.w. modifications: Building coverage is 9.6% (30% maximum). Overall coverage is 61.3% (70% maximum). Front yard coverage is 27.9% (30% maximum). Landscapin& The project does not involve altering the approved landscaping. As the alterations are primarily equipment and landscape oriented, the minimum landscaping requirement is not applicable. The generator will be hidden from the street by an existing wall. No additional landscaping is recommended. 10) �& 111 CHASE PROPERTIES — SITE 1P11N & CONDl'd' ONA;L USE — 20,160 St? PT WAREHOUSE &LIGHT HAnFACIIIHMG BUILDING, 5 GREEN TREE DRIVE This project consists of a conditional use application under Section 26.05, Conditional Uses of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and a site plan application to construct a 20,160 square foot warehouse and light manufacturing building. Site Plana Criteria: Access/circulation: Access is to be provided via two curb cuts on Green Tree Drive. The northern most curb cut will be 24 feet wide leading to a 13 foot access drive. The southern curb cut will be 21 feet wide leading to a 13 feet wide access drive. The access drive around the building will be designated as one-way although each curb cut will be for two-way access. Section 26.103(a) of the Zoning Regulations states that `Unless specifically approved, there shall be a maximum of one driveway per lot accessing a public street". Staff recommends that the northerly access drive be ingress only and the southerly access be for egress only. The plans should show enter and exit signs to designate the access drives. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: The proposed building coverage will be 25.3 percent (30% maximum). Overall lot coverage will be 69.6 percent (70% maximum). The proposed front yard coverage will be the maximum of 29 percent (30% maximum). All setbacks are being met. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, of $11,500 is being met. Proposed plantings include red maples, white pines, white spruce, and cedars. Lighting: Cut sheets have been submitted. All lights must be downwardly shielded and approved by the Director of Planning and Zoning. Proposed lighting consists of -five (5) 175-watt metal halide building mounted lights with cutoff fixtures MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: July 11, 2000 Agenda Items Date: June 26, 2000 1) CHASE PROPERTIES - 5 GREEN TREE DRIVE Site plan and conditional use applications - 10,109 square feet warehousing and light industrial building. — all access roads must be 18 feet wide — the building must be sprinklered with four (4) inch Startz Fire Department Connection/alarm panel with lock box on the exterior of the building. 2) DORSET LAND COMPANY - ADDITION RELOCATION - 415 DORSET STREET — The sprinkler system must be extended into the new addition 3) VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS - SWIFT STREET Site plan showing utility pad dated April 1997 with latest revision dated 6/7/00 prepared by Civil Engineering Associates is acceptable. 4) FAUCETT SUBDIVISION - 1397 SPEAR STREET - CEDAR GLEN NORTH 1. Lot two may not have frontage on Cedar Glen. This will require a title search and survey. 2. Next plan shall show water and sewer service and street access drive. MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Development Review Board From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: July 11, 2000 agenda items Date: June 29, 2000 1) Chase Properties 5 Green Tree Drive Site plan and conditional use applications - 10,109 square feet warehousing and light industrial building. — all access roads must be 18 feet wide — the building must be sprinklered with four (4) inch Startz Fire Department Connection/alarm panel with lock box on the exterior of the building. 2) Dorset Land Company - Addition Relocation 415 Dorset Street — The sprinkler system must be extended into the new addition 3) Lojek 1327 Spear Street Acceptable 4) Goldberg 1760 Dorset Street The applicant should consult with the Fire Department on the proposed hydrant locations. 5) Vermont Gas Systems - Swift Street Acceptable No Text PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, July 11, 2000, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Appeal #ZBA-99-30 of John Larkin to overturn the Administrative Officer's Notice of Violation dated June 30, 1999 that the appellant is in violation of the zoning regulations for having constructed a single family dwelling at 6 Pinnacle Drive which exceeds the 417.565 foot mean sea level elevation maximum allowed under Section 22.401 of the zoning regulations. 2) Application #CU-00-15 of Chase Properties and Development, LTD seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.05, Conditional Uses, and Section 26.65, Multiple Structures and Uses on Lots, of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to allow light manufacturing use in conjunction with warehousing, storage and distribution use, 5 Green Tree Drive. 3) Final plat application #SD-00-33 of Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. to amend a previously approved planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a 38,428 square foot building for general office use and a bank with drive -through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street. The amendment consists of the installation of a 30kW electrical generator (Capstone Micoturbine) and sidewalk, 85 Swift Street. 4) Final plat application #SD-00-30 of Dorset Land Company to amend a planned unit development consisting of a 184 unit congregate housing facility and a 103 unit extended stay hotel in two (2) buildings. The amendment consists of: 1) adding one (1) hotel unit, and 2) constructing a 12' x 30' addition in place of a previously approved 9' x 32' addition, 401 and 415 Dorset Street. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board June 24, 2000 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT 1) Name of Applicant �'��/yNT sy✓Ci�MS /IBC. 2 ) Name of Subdivision ��� if 5� /�'• D . F7— SI• 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plot designer since preliminary plat application 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: ic )t-� 5) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and c�pntaining all information required under Section 202.1 of the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under Section 202.1 (I1) and (12) of the subdivision regulations or a minor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) f * a 4naj orlubdivis ion . (Signat'lre) alp:icant or contact person /-7,- /d-n Date e;. }'3j,,/ psrvi4w ooAr'^. VGS Microturbine Project FrOP7- ViFw OF Co b ("' lgeiuc I.P,evill�� "few,7,1431"'r t F/to -A)/(,C- NOT g� -90,rF7- s7T�7- A-K)cam-- I/is/A3 6)AF- Ffz,5)ly Capstone MicroTurbineTM System Fuel Supply Fuel System Air Exhaust MicroTurbine Communications jo. Digital Power Controller Electrical Output User Interface The Capstone MicroTurbineT" system is a compact, low emission, power generator providing electrical power up to 30kW. Solid-state power electronics allow grid -connect operation; stand-alone battery support and automat- ic grid/stand-alone switching are available options. The system incorporates a compressor, recuperator, combustor, turbine and permanent magnet generator. The rotating components are mounted on a single shaft, supported by patented air bearings that rotate at up to 96,000 RPM (full load). The generator is cooled by air flow into the gas turbine, thus eliminating the need for liq- uid cooling. System output is variable frequency (50/60 Hz) AC power. A non -recuperated model is also available. The Capstone MicroTurbineTM Generator Generator Cooling Fins Exhaust Air Intake General Compn bustion nber Injector CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION 6430 Independence Avenue, Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Phone: 818.716.2929 Fax: 818.716.9910 www.capstoneturbine.com aWr Capstone �vo.-IN Features • 29 kW net (ISO conditions) • 400-480 VAC, 50/60 Hz 3-phase, 3-wire wye or 4-wire wye, or comer ground delta, 46A/phase max • Grid -connect or stand-alone • Internal fuel compression system • Patented air bearings • Digital power controller • Air cooled • Type 3R outdoor enclosure 2. 2 J 2i 9 V o W Lu LL ro n E v i`- Capstone MicroTurbineTM Benefits • Ultra -low emissions • Minimal maintenance • No liquid lubricants • No liquid coolants • Small footprint • Vibration -free • Quiet operation • MultiPac capable • Optional remote monitoring Inlet Air Temperature (degC) 20 -IS -10 -5 0 5 10 Is 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 30 Conformance UL-Listed (UL 2200) ANSI C84.1 25 IEEE 519 NFPA 37 NFPA 54 20 3 N NFPA 70 CAN/CSA.C22.2 No. 100-95 7 a 1! 1s � O & ql LISTED 10 0 5 0 .4 s 14 23 32 41 50 59 68 77 86 95 104 113 122 Inlet Air Temperature (deg F) Performance @ 50 or 60Hz Low pressure natural gas (15 psig) Low pressure natural gas (5 psig) Emissions: NO. Intake/Exhaust Fuel flow (natural gas-HHV) Exhaust gas temperature Total exhaust energy Full -Load Power 29 kW net (+/- 1) 28 kW net (+/- 1) <9ppmV @ 15% 02 440,000 kJ/hr (420,000 Btu/hr) 261'C / 5007 305,000 kJ/hr (290,000 Btu/hr) Industrial, walk-in and open packaging options also available. Efficiency (LHv) 26 % (+/- 2) 26 % (+/- 2) Heat Rate (LHv) 13,700 kJ (13,000 Btu) / kWh 14,100 kJ (13,400 Btu) / kWh Dimensions H: 1900mm / 74.8" W: 714mm / 28.1" D: 1344mm / 52.9" Weight 490 kg / 1082 lb Add 173 kg/380 lb for nand -alone opuon Typical Sound Level 65dBA @ 10 In 33 It All specifications rated at full -load power Fuel compression system warranted for 5-15 psig operation. Fuel Heat Content: 26, 100 to 93.850 kJ/Nm3 (700 to 2615 Btu/sco HHV. Note:The manufacturer reserves the right to change or modify without notice, the design or equipment specifications without incurring any obligation either with respect to equipment previously sold or in the process of construction. CAPSTONE TURBINE CORPORATION www.capstoneturbine.com CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 April 19, 2000 Stephen Vock Civil Engineering Associates PO Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Re: Final Plat Amendment for 68 & 85 Swift Street and Sketch Plan for 60 Farrell Street Dear Mr. Vock: Enclosed please find a copy of Finding of Facts of the Development Review Board meeting on April 4, 2000 (effective date April 18, 2000) as well as a copy of the minutes of this meeting. Please note the conditions of approval. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Planning & Zoning Assistant Enclosure DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 4 APRIL 2000 Mr. Rabideau showed the approved plan. He said the applicant proposes to substitute residences for the office building. Access would remain as approved. There would be some parking changes, but all parking requirements would be met. The impact on traffic would be less than with the previous plan. There would be a slight increase in sewer allocation. There would also be more impact on the schools. The housing proposed would be upscale, with a town home look. All would be 2- bedroom units aimed at young professionals. Buildings would conform to height limitations. The exterior would be brick with some stucco accents. Mr. O'Rourke asked about the proposed extra future parking spaces for the Olympiad. Mr. Belair said he would ask that those be taken off the plan. The applicant for those would have to be the Olympiad and they are not a co -applicant with this plan. Mr. Belair also said this should be documented as one PUD. Mr. Rabideau noted a request for a driveway to join the two parcels. He said they would rather not. Mr. Belair said the request was for a pedestrian link. Mr. Rabideau said they could do that. Mr. Belair suggested some shared parking so there isn't so much pavement. Mr. Rabideau said they are also willing to put in some parking islands to break up the mass. Mr. Schmitt said he would rather not encumber the office lot with a parking agreement. A majority of members favored a parking requirement based on a potential for shared parking. Mr. Rabideau asked if they could go right to final plat. Mr. O'Rourke had no problem as long as there were no issues with the CO District. Members agreed if there were no significant concerns. 5. Public Hearing: Final Plat Application #SD-00-13 of Daniel Morrissey to amend a planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a 38,428 sq. ft. building for general office use and a bank with drive -through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street. The amendment consists of amending condition #5 of the 7/15/98 approval to extend by three years the date by which the proposed internal future access drive shall be constructed: Mr. Webster showed the approved plan. He noted that the Vermont Gas project has never proceeded and Mr. Morrissey has purchased the property. The access that was proposed is into a pipe yard and the concern is that if the road is put in that location it may be in the wrong spot and hinder other development. They need more time to think about this. F) DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD 4 APRIL 2000 Mr. Kimbell of Vermont Gas explained his thoughts on replacing the warehouse space. Both parties want and intend to have the connection. The question is where. Mr. O'Rourke moved the Development Review Board approve final plat application #SD-00-13 of Daniel Morrissey to amend a planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a 38,428 sq. ft. building for general office use and a bank with drive -through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street. The amendment consists of amending condition #5 of the 7/15/97 approval to extend by three years the date by which the proposed internal future access drive shall be constructed, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Condition #5 of the 7/15/97 approval shall be revised to read as follows: "The proposed internal future access drive shall be constructed within six years from the date of final approval. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, a bond to cover the cost of the future access drive shall be posted and shall remain in effect until said future access drive is constructed." Ms. Quimby seconded the motion which was then passed unanimously. 6. PUBLIC HEARING: Application #CU-00-06 of National Gardening Association seeking conditional use approval under Section 26.05, Conditional Uses of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to construct a handicapped access ramp, 1100 Dorset Street: and 7. Site plan application #SP-00-03 of National Gardening Association to add a ramp to the exterior of the building at 1100 Dorset Street for handicap accessibility. The National Gardening Association is a not -for -profit organization whose primary purpose is the provision of educational or research services, related to agriculture, horticulture, forestry, natural resource preservation, the arts or recreation: Mr. Grzywna explained that the ramp would go to the existing deck on the property, then taper down to the parking lot. Mr. Miller said they would comply with all in the staff notes. 3 O D 4/4/00 MOTION OF APPROVAL DANIEL MORRISSEY I move the South Burlington Development Review Board approve final plat application #SD-00-13 of Daniel Morrissey to amend a planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a 38,428 square foot building for ge' .�. ai office use and a bank with drive -through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street. The amendment consists of amending condition #5 of the 7/15/97 approval to extend by three (3) years the date by which the proposed internal future access drive shall be constructed, with the following stipulations: 1) All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2) Condition #5 of the 7/15/97 approval shall be revised to read as follows: "The proposed internal future access drive shall be constructed within six (6) years from the date of final approval. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, a bond to cover the cost of the future access drive shall be posted and shall remain in effect until said future access drive is constructed." 1.6 sl �r'll ���;��, �r r\JJJ,I��r��. 928 Falls Road P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 February 25, 2000 Mr. Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 69 Swift Street PUD Dear Ray: Phone: 802-985-2323 Fax: 802-985-2271 E-Mail: cea@together.net Please find enclosed a Final Plat Subdivision Application (amended), fee and five copies of the original site plan for the 69 Swift Street PUD. As we discussed, the redevelopment plans for the Vermont Gas property have not been completed, therefore there is concern that if the connecting roadway (as approved on the original PUD) was constructed at this point, it may be in conflict with the ultimate Vermont Gas plans and would then need to be reconstructed. If you should have any questions or need additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, Stephen A. Vock, P.E. SAV:pao Enclosures 1.. //'■■0/7■/-M!■■k h/a/■■q�lY\■.1lir7.ga•tMoro�.h.wii2ir6nat `.NiiO:. :■•■IYl■rLAoi%i�i ■■%%iCi .Yi7afff�f'f�l�� • ^7-"�?'�7■'I■7a'rt�=Yw� IY'� c tea t.� .\! II► ;,:,• �' �, ��� il�� Itr■■!•arr�i���R1igi i►� ax i � � i ■rrn■ 1' j �� rill . �e1+ �. �R ■ , �Y ' L' /line/'. �i *n.1.,....-... .... x �, . ■o..uuui Monona■■■. igsq W�g g g Npi Ki0113. � � .off t ��.,� �� � �j♦t • :: ji j iwv; a,'Ira 14�P" ,\v i SWFT �m Ma m M 1. .., . 1 ASSOCIATES, VERMONT CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - SKETCH PLAN 1) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Owner of record''` b. Applicant tU SsL c. Contact 2) Purpose, location, and nature of subdivision or development, including number of lots, units, or parcels and proposed use(s). 2d ZZ /J// 3) Applicant's legal interest in the property (fee simple, option, etc. -,"T_ Q ��-r�o.�f.% lv.,r124 V>" !fJs 4) Names of owners of record of all contiguous properties 5) Type of existing or proposed encumbrances on property such as easements, covenants, leases, rights of way, etc. 0 1 6) Proposed extension, relocation, or modification of municipal facilities such as sanitary sewer, water supply, streets, storm drainage, etc. 7) Describe any previous actions taken by the Zoning Board of Adjustment or by the South Burlington Planning Commission which affects the proposed subdivision, and include the dates of such actions: 8) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (8J x 11, 81 x 14 or 11 x 17) of a Sketch plan showing the following information: a) Name and address of the owner of record and applicant. b) Name of owners of record of contiguous properties. c) Date, true north arrow and scale (numerical and graphic). d) Boundaries and area of: 1) all contiguous land belonging to owner of record, and 2) proposed subdivision. e) Existing and proposed layout of property lines; type and location of existing and proposed restrictions on land, such as easements and covenants. f) Type of, location, and size of existing and proposed streets, structures, utilities, and open space. g) Existing zoning boundaries. h) Existing water courses, wetlands, floodplains, wooded areas, ledge outcrops, and other natural features. i) Location of existing septic systems and wells. j) Location map, showing relation of proposed subdivision to adjacent property and surrounding area. k) All applicable information required for a site plan, as provided in the South Burlington Zoning Regulations, shall be submitted for subdivisions involving a commercial or industrial complex, multi -family project, planned unit dev opment, or planned residential Bevel ment. (Signature) applicant contact person Date �r... �f �- CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application FINAL PLAT - AMENDED 1 ) Name of Applicant Daniel Morrissey 2 ) Name of Subdivision Swift Street PUD 3) Indicate any change to name, address, or phone number of owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, surveyor, attorney or plot designer since preliminary plat application None. 4) Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, or developmental timetable, since preliminary plat application: Since the Vermont Gas property development has not yet occurred, the applicant is requesting to defer construction of the connecting road for three additional years which will allow for the roadway to be constructed.simultaneously with the connecting road. S) Submit five copies and one reduced copy (11 x 17) of a final plat plus engineering drawings and c ntaining all information required under Section 202.1 0 the subdivision regulations for a minor subdivision and under Section 204.1(a) for a major subdivision. 6) Submit two draft copies of all legal documents required under S tion 202.1 (11) and (12) of the subdivision regul ns for a, minor sudivision and under Section 204.1(b) for ajor division. (S1gnature)//appl.icaf�t-_ or contact person Date 4- 5 2000 Any fire protection measures (i.e. sprinklers). All proposed exterior lights (both freestanding and building mounted). Cut sheets for all fixtures should also be submitted. 5) DANIEL MORISSEY, FINAL PLAT AMENDMENT, DEFER CONSTRUCTION OF CONNECTING ROAD, 69 SWIFT STREET This projects consists of amending a previously approved final plat application for a planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a 38,428 square foot building for general office use and a bank with drive -through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street as approved on July 15, 1997 (minutes enclosed). The amendment consists of amending condition #5 of the 7/15/97 approval to extend by three (3) years the date by which the proposed internal future access drive shall be constructed. These properties are located at 69 and 85 Swift Street lie within the Cl District. They are bounded on the east by the access to Farrell Park, on the north by Swift Street and an auto body repair shop, on the south by Farrell Park, and several residences, and on the west by a mini -warehouse complex. Access/circulation: access to the PUD is currently provided by a 36-foot curb cut at 85 Swift Street. A 24-foot curb cut has been approved for the new building at 69 Swift Street. The future internal access drive will connect 69 Swift Street and 85 Swift Street. This access road will connect the parking lot at 85 Swift Street at the southwesterly corner. Planned Unit Developments are, by nature, intended to have internal circulation between buildings and parking areas. The Development Review Board should consider the implications of delaying this internal access drive and how it potentially affects the intended relation of the approved structures. 6) & 7) NATIONAL GARDENING ASSOCIATION, CONDITIONAL USE AND SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS, RAMP ADDITION, 1100 DORSET STREET This project consists of adding a ramp to the exterior of a 4500 square foot structure for a non-profit organization whose primary purpose is the provision of educational or research services related to agriculture, horticulture, forestry, natural resource preservation, the arts and recreation. The proposed ramp will use the existing porch to provide an accessible entrance by adding a 9-foot by 7-foot section to the existing porch on the south facade and a 6-foot by 12-foot ramp to the east facade. The National Gardening Association occupies at total of 2,900 square feet of the 4,500 square foot building (December 21, 1999 and March 7, 2000 minutes enclosed). The only issues affected by this application are setbacks and coverage. This property located at 1100 Dorset Street lies within the Park and Recreation District. It is bounded on the north by Swift Street, on the west by Dorset Street, on the south by the golf course and on the east by undeveloped land. Site Plan Criteria: Coverages/setbacks: Coverages and setbacks are being met. Conditional Use Criteria: The proposed use complies with the stated purpose of the Park and Recreation District to "provide for and to protect recreational use and/or open space in municipal parks, beaches, natural areas and other land owned by the City." The proposed use will not adversely affect: a) the capacity of existing or planned community facilities. No effect expected. b) the character of the area affected. The proposed educational and research facility is compatible with the provision and protection of open space and natural areas. c) traffic on roads or highways in the vicinity. The proposed use is not expected to impact traffic. d) bylaws in effect. The proposal is in conformance with the zoning regulations. e) utilization of renewable energy resources. There is no utilization of renewable energy resources to be affected. f) general public health and welfare. No adverse effect expected. Additional Standards: Any use proposed under Section 4.20 of the zoning regulations must demonstrate that the following additional standards will be met: 4.401 The proposed use will provide an affirmative public benefit to the City and its citizens. 4.402 The proposed use will provide for and protect public recreational use and open space on the project site. 4.403 The proposed use will include the provision of areas that may be used or accessed by the general public. While the applicant has addressed these standards in the applicant's previous site plan and conditional use request, the applicant should submit a brief report on how the project satisfies these standards and be prepared to answer questions regarding these standards at the meeting. MEMORANDUM To: Applicants/Project Files From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: Comments, April 4, 2000 agenda items Date: March 17, 2000 WRIGHT & MORRISSEY REALTY �' CORPORATION - JOY DRIVE 1. Water Department must review the water service to the new building. 2. It may be an advantage to have a connection between the two parking lots especially in an emergency. The fire hydrant to serve the building is in the rear (west). E'THAIN ALLEN FARMS - INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION - LOT 36 - RIVERSIDE AUTO BODY - COMMERCE AVENUE 1. Removed curb at entrance drive shall be replaced with a concrete depressed curb. 2. Water shutoff valve shall be placed 6 inches from the property line. 3. Sanitary sewer pipe shall be bedded in 3/4 inch crushed stone only. 4. Concrete curb detail should include a depressed curb detail. S T STREET P.U.D. - DRIVE CONNECTING LOT 62 TO LOT 85 Unless there is a need for additional parking at either office, I have no objc-.:.'- k to delaying the construction of the connecting drive. a 1f Site plan dated 7/13/99 prepared by Llewellyn - Howley Engineers, is acceptable. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 31, 2000 Stephen Vock Civil Engineering Associates P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Re: Daniel Morrissey, Final Plat Amendment, 69 & 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Vock: Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Development Review Board meeting and comments from the City Engineer Bill Szymanski and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, April 4, 2000 at 7:30 p.m. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum, Planning & Zoning Assistant SM/mcp Encls PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Bur- lington City Hall Confer- ence Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesdayy April 4. 2000. at 7:30 P.M. to consider the fol- lowing: 11 Final plat application o Daniel Morrissey to amend a planned unit de- velopment consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a 38,428 square foot building for general office use and a bank with drive -through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street. The amendment consists of amending condition #5 of the 7115i97 approval to ex- tend by three (3) years the date by which the proposed internal future access drive shall be constructed. 2) Application of River- side Auto Body seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.05, Con- ditional Uses of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations Request is for permission to con- struct a 10,625 square foot building to be used for automobile repair and service, 3 Commerce Avenue. 31 Final plat application o John Larkin to amend a planned unit develop- ment consisting of con- structing an addition to an existing hotel building and a new 71 room hotel building on a site devel- oped with an 89 room hotel and 275 seat res- taurant. The amendment consists of: 11 modifyinq the footprint of the new — _ -- --- -f oiel by-iid parking dalndcap-incg — -- — — — — — modifications, 1 Dorset Street. 4 Final plat application o Dorset Land Com- pany, Inc. to amend a planned unit develop- ment consisting of a 184 unit congregate housing facility and a 103 unit ex- tended stay hotel in two 121 buildings. The a m e n d - ment consists of con- structing: 1] a 5'x10.5 a d dition to main hotel building, 21 a 9'x32' addi- tion to main hotel build- ing and 31 two [2] addi- tional structural elements to proposed sky bridge, 401 and 415 Dorset Street. 51 Application of Na- tional Gardening Associ- ation seeking conditional use approval under Sec- tion 26.05, Conditional Uses of the South Bur- lington Zoning Regula- tions. Request is for per- mission to construct a handicapped access ramp, 1100 Dorset Street. Copies of the applica- tions are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board March 18, 2000 CAVIL El IGI! IERRII` G AVE0 JCIANIES, INC 928 Falls Road P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 March 17, 2000 Mr. Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Hearing for 69 Swift Street PUD Dear Ray: Phone: 802-985-2323 Fax: 802-985-2271 E-Mail: cea(d,)together.net Please table the April 4' hearing for the 69 Swift PUD until the April 18`h meeting so that the appropriate individuals can be present to discuss the project. Thank you. Sincerely, Stephen A. Vock, P.E. SAV:pao DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONr 05403 (802) 846-4106 FAX (802) 846-4101 March 20, 2000 Stephen Nock Civil Engineering Associates P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, VT 05482 Re: Daniel Morrisey , Final Plat Amendment, Defer Construction of Connecting Road, 69 Swift Street Dear Mr. Vock: Please find enclosed preliminary comments on the above referenced application. The project is currently scheduled to be considered by the Development Review Board on April 4, 2000. Please be sure that someone is at this meeting to represent your application. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely, Sarah MacCallum Planning & Zoning Assistant Enclosure To: Applicants From: Sarah MacCallum, City of South Burlington RE: Project Staff Notes Date: March 20, 2000 SD-00-13 Daniel Morrisey , Final Plat Amendment, Defer Construction of Connecting Road, 69 Swift Street Previous Action: Final Plat Approval, Planned Unit Development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas and a new 38,428 Sq. Ft. Building, Approved by the Planning Commission on July 15, 1997. Overview: The applicant was required, a condition of final plat approval, to construct a connecting road from Vermont Gas to the proposed building within three years of the date of final approval. Since the proposed building has not yet been built, the applicant is requesting a deferment for three additional years. Issues: None Completeness of Plan: The applicant has submitted sufficient information for Development Review Board to consider the final plat. Recommendation: Staff recommends that no additional information need be submitted. PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, April 4, 2000, at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Final plat application of Daniel Morrissey to amend a planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a 38,428 square foot building for general office use and a bank with drive -through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street. The amendment consists of amending condition #5 of the 7/15/97 approval to extend by three (3) years the date by which the proposed internal future access drive shall be constructed. 2) Application of Riverside Auto Body seeking conditional use approval from Section 26.05, Conditional Uses of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to construct a 10,625 square foot building to be used for automobile repair and service, 3 Commerce Avenue. 3) Final plat application of John Larkin to amend a planned unit dev6opment consisting of constructing an addition to an existing hotel building and a new 71 room hotel building on a site developed with an 89 room hotel and 275 seat restaurant. The amendment consists of: 1) modifying the footprint of the new hotel building, and 2) parking and landscaping modifications, 1 Dorset Street. 4) Final plat application of Dorset Land Company, Inc. to amend a planned unit development consisting of a 184 unit congregate housing facility and a 103 unit extended stay hotel in two (2) buildings. The amendment consists of constructing: 1) a 5' x 10.5 addition to main hotel building, 2) a 9' x 32' addition to main hotel building, and 3) two (2) additonal structural elements to proposed sky bridge, 401 and 415 Dorset Street. 5) Application of National Gardening Association seeking conditional use approval under Section 26.05, Conditional Uses of the South Burlington Zoning Regulations. Request is for permission to construct a handicapped access ramp, 1100 Dorset Street. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. John Dinklage, Chairman South Burlington Development Review Board March 18, 2000 UFidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland Home Office: P.O. Box 1227, Baltimore, MD 21203-1227 YW O Bond No. LPM 0005971 NOTICE OF CANCELLATION April 1,1999 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05402 The undersigned Surety upon a certain Future Access at 69 Swift St. Project (License and/or Permit Bond in your favor as follows: Principal: Daniel Morrissey C/O Wright & Morrissey, Inc. Bond No.: LPM 0005971 Amount of Coverage: $75,000 Effective Date: 09/15/97 hereby notifies you that it desires to cancel and does hereby cancel said bond as an entirety. Such cancellation to become effective May 6,1999. Please send written confirmation of this notice to the address below. This notice is given to you in accordance with the cancellation provision in said bond contained. By' �1 Veronica Price, Attorney -in -Fact Surety Service Center - Northeast Region 11411 Red Run Blvd. Suite 300-Northeast Owings Mills, Md 21117-3246 slf ❑ Original to Obligee ❑ Principal's Copy ❑ Agent's Copy ❑ File Copy J310 WRIGHT & MORRISSEY, C. w i�w _. , P.O. Box 421 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402 LETTER (802) 863-4541 FAX (802) 865-1253 DATE/�./99... ....... __ TO �........��... _._ SUBJECT ......... b9,_-'(' . ...... .. I> ❑ Please Reply ❑ No Reply Necessary SIGNED Nft WRIGHT & MORRISSEY, INC. 60 Farrell Street., Suite 401, So. Burlington, VT 05403 GENERAL CONTRACTORS P.O. Box 421, Burlington, VT 05402 July 24, 1998 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Attention: Mr. Ray Belair Dear Ray: As per your request, enclosed please find a revised landscaping plan for 69 Swift Street. If you should have any questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to call me. Sincerely, Kelly L. LaPan Owner's Representative KLL (802) 863-4541 Fax 865-1253 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY K In accordance with Section BQ20 of the Zoning Regulations the premises located at (/Q S F � 2 having been completed $ 13 �`� as per specifications outlined in Zoning Permit No. dated 5 1 may now be used for Temporary Certificate valid for OQU T �0 65 c _/ f-1" occupancy. ,,,days. Administrative Officer CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY In accordance with Section 29,20 of the Zoning Regulations the premises located at having been completed as per specifications outlined in Zoning Permit No. 9 _ dated 31 �� occupancy. may now be used for Temporary Certificate valid -AN �, ,� days. 5W/k�' AW iL % `A{ b y (AV A m pgI3fE Z ning Administrative officer City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 26, 1998 Michael Simoneau Hickok & Boardman P.O. Box 923 Burlington, Vermont 05402-0923 Dear Michael: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 I am writing in response to your letter dated 5/12/98 regarding the proposed Credit Union at 69 Swift Street. I agree that the proposed 1,025 square feet of area devoted to general banking services for public use is within the 1,200 square foot maximum established by the Planning Commission in their approval. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Weith, Planner JW/mcp HICKOK & BOARDMAN COMMERCIAL REALTY May 12, 1998 ATTN: City Planner Joe Weith South Burlington Municipal Offices 575 Dorset St. South Burlington, VT 05403 Dear Joe: Thanks for taking the time to review the Credit Union use we are entertaining for a small Space located at 69 Swift St. in the recently constructed Swift Financial Plaza. I am enclosing a sketch with some square footage information to clarify the space that is being used by the public for what is generally termed "retail banking activity". As you know, our permits were based on this area not exceeding 1,200 sq.ft.; and if this figure was exceeded, additional parking might be required. As you can see from the sketch and information provided, the space currently being used by the NorthCountry Federal Credit Union is approx. 900 sq.ft. Additional space that will be employed by another Credit Union is in the vicinity of 125 sq.ft., creating a total of 1,025+- sq.ft. which is well below the 1,200 sq.ft. figure we are allowed. On NorthCountry Federal Credit Unions' behalf I would ask that you provide a short letter to confirm your agreement with this information and approval of our use of this space as discussed. The letter would create comfort for all concerned and encourage lessor and lessee to move forward with the execution of a lease and occupancy of the space that will occur in the near future. Please let me know if you have any questions or if there is anything else I can do to assist you in this matter. Thanks for your time and consideration. Regards, Michael S. Simoneau Vice President MSS/Id Enclosure 125 College Street, P.O. Box 923, Burlington, Vermont 05402-0923 • Tel. (802) 658-6666 Fax (802) 860-2424 125 College Street Burlington, VT 05 101 (802) 658-6666 (802) 860-2424 (FAX) FOR SALE OR LEASE 346 Shelburne Road Burlington, VT 05401 (802) 658-0493 (802) 862-0785 (EAx) NEW "1ST CLASS" OFFICE SPACE 69 SWIFT ST., SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT • FROM 2,000-11,000 SQ.FT. AVAILABLE, INCLUDING: • 1 ST FLOOR: 2,000 SQ.FT. ACROSS FROM NORTHCOUNTRY CREDIT UNION RETAIL BANKING SERVICE AREA • 3RD FLOOR: FROM 2,000 — 11,000 SQ.FT. • MAY 1, 1998 OCCUPANCY • GENEROUS FIT -UP ALLOWANCE • ACCESSIBLE LOCATION NEAR SHELBURNE RD. INTERSTATE EXIT 13 • WALK TO HEALTH CLUBS AND RESTAURANTS • THE OFFICE LOCATION OF CHOICE FOR SMITH BARNEY, NORTHCOUNTRY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, VERMONT GAS, LOCKHEED MARTIN, PAINE WEBBER, HALLAM ENGINEERING, METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE AND OTHERS • BASE ANNUAL RENT: $13.25/SQ.FT + CAM (EST. $3.25/SQ.FT.) FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND VIEWING CONTACT EXCLUSIVE AGENT: MICHAEL SIMONEAU 658-6666, x 237/W OR 862-5609/H Commercial Real Estate • Business Brokerage • Property Management • Buyer Representation L MANA,c.R -MEMBER SERVICE 102 i103 EQUIM HEA12, TELLER 105 104 79 S I f Y-. JI 4.7 __ } __ - - -- - - _ _. Stair -T f Z:f ont LI -4 1 CU TELLERS 107 under- counter.:: steel AM it WHRUPOR building -- ---- - 1.7 enter (D- v U FIRST FLOOR PLAN A- 1 1/6' - 1'-0. 7/15/97 MOTION OF APPROVAL WRIGHT & MORRISSEY, INC. I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the final plat application of Wright & Morrissey, Inc. for a planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a new 38,428 square foot building for general office use and a bank with drive through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street, as depicted on a 12 page set of plans, page two (2) entitled "Swift Street P.U.D. Property of Daniel Morrissey & Vermont Gas South Burlington Vermont," prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc, dated June, 1997, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the office building, all appropriate legal documents (e.g. irrevocable offer of dedication and warranty deed for the street widening/pedestrian improvements) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records. 3. The applicant shall construct a 10 foot wide sidewalk/recreation path along that portion of the project's frontage which does not currently have a sidewalk/recreation path. This sidewalk/recreation path shall be continuous across the Couillard property with the appropriate legal documents or constructed within the existing Swift Street r.o.w. This sidewalk/recreation path shall be constructed prior to occupancy of the office building and to the specifications approved by the Public Works Director. Prior to start of construction of the sidewalk/recreation path, the applicant shall post a bond which covers the cost of the sidewalk/recreation path. 4. The plat plans shall be revised to show the changes listed below and shall require approval of the City Planner. Three (3) copies of the approved revised plat plans shall be submitted to the City Planner prior to recording. a) The plans shall be revised to show the sidewalk/recreation path constructed to the driveway serving Farrell Park. b) The landscape plan shall be revised to provide dense evergreen plantings along the southerly boundary as required under Section 25.108 of the zoning regulations. c) The Overall Site Plan shall amount of wetland impacted internal access. 1 be revised to indicate the by the fill for the future d) The survey plat shall be revised to show the 8.25 foot strip along Swift Street to be reserved for future dedication. 5. The proposed internal future access drive shall be constructed within three (3) years from the date of final approval. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, a bond to cover the cost of the future access drive shall be posted and shall remain in effect until said future access drive is constructed. 6. Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a 3.7% parking waiver for the proposed office building. It is the Commission's opinion that fewer spaces will adequately serve the project since a significant portion of the gross square footage of the building will be devoted to uses which typically do not generate parking demand (e.g. stairwells). 7. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $28,500 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 8. All new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. Details of any building mounted lights shall be approved by the City Planner prior to permit issuance. 9. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the proposed office builidng will generate 130.1 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 10. Pursuant to Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a 16 foot height waiver for the proposed office building. The Commission has determined that this taller structure: (i) will not affect adversely the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (ii) will not detract from the important scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of -way. 11. The Planning Commission grants an additional sewer allocation of 840 gpd (2,040 gpd total) for the new office/bank building. 12. The applicant shall record in the land records, a "Notice of Condition" which clearly indicates that this project constitutes a PUD and that for zoning and subdivision purposes the entire property will be regarded as a single parcel of land. This document shall require approval of the City Attorney and shall be recorded prior to recording the final plat plans. 2 13. Any change to the final plat plans shall require approval of the Planning Commission. 14. The final plat plans shall be recorded in the land records within 90 days or this approval is null and void. The plans shall be signed by the Planning Commission Chair or Clerk prior to recording. Prior to recording the final plat plans, the applicant shall submit a copy of the survey plat in digital format. The format of the digital information shall be approved by the City Planner. 3 14JI - IL, -71 ,,�,, �' c- ` � � ��7,s ��� �� �S� � 3 � 6 ,�: � �. � d �� .� �'� � �� 7 = �/. %l`y � � �%�� �� j,� � J �: 6 �� �f, /'�� � _�' 1� Memorandum - Planning July 15, 1997 agenda items July 11, 1997 page 4 Coverage/setbacks: Building 30%). Overall coverage will allowed is 7096) . Front yard (maximum allowed is 30%). coverage is 21.4% (maximum allowed is decrease from 72.8% to 70.0% (maximum coverage will decrease from 38 % to 36% The proposed boundary line adjustment will result in the new property line passing through an existing structure and not meeting the 15 foot side yard setback requirement. This structure must be removed prior to conveyance of the parcels. Trailers: There are two (2) trailers on the property which appear to be used for storage. These trailers were not approved as part of the original site plan approval and should be removed. The trailer shown along the south boundary should be removed from the plan. Revised final plat: The revised final plat plans should include the following additional information: --- type of, location, and size of existing utilities. --- indicate that the southerly property boundary line is the boundary between the C1 District to the north and R4 District to the south. --- show reserved strip for future street widening. --- property lines to be dissolved should be clearly indicated as such. 7) WRIGHT & MORRISSEY - OFFICE BUILDING & PUD - FINAL PLAT This project consists of: 1) constructing a 38,428 square foot 4- story general office building (including a bank with drive -through service), 2) combine two (2) contiguous lots into a planned unit development (69 and 85 Swift Street), and 3) construct a parking area at 57 Swift Street. The lot at 57 Swift Street will be combined into the PUD after a boundary line adjustment is approved. The preliminary plat was approved on 5/13/97 (minutes enclosed). These properties located at 57, 69 and 85 Swift Street lie within the C1 District. They are bounded on the east by the access to Farrell Park, on the north by Swift Street and an auto body repair shop, on the south by Farrell Park and several residences, and on the west by a mini -warehouse complex. Access/circulation: Access to the PUD will be provided by a 36 foot curb cut at 85 Swift Street, and a 24 foot curb cut at 69 Swift Street. An internal future access drive is proposed which would connect 69 Swift Street and 85 Swift Street. This access P. Memorandum - Planning July 15, 1997 agenda items July 11, 1997 page 5 road connects with the parking lot at 85 Swift Street at the southwesterly corner (preliminary plat condition #4a). Preliminary plat condition #5 required that this access drive be constructed within three (3) years from the date of final approval. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Entire PUD after r.o.w. modification: Building coverage is 9.66 (maximum allowed is 3096). Overall coverage is 61.5$ (maximum allowed is 700) Front yard coverage is 27.9%- (maximum allowed is 30a). Setback requirements are met. Parking: The proposed office building requires a total of 161 spaces and 155 spaces are being provided including six (6) handicapped spaces. This is a six (6) space or 3.7% shortfall. Preliminary plat condition #6 limits the project to a 4$ parking waiver. A bike rack is being provided as required under Section 26.253 (b) of the zoning regulations. The parking standards require that each drive -up window have sufficient stacking room for six (6) cars and that a by-pass lane be provided. This requirement is met. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $28,500 which is being met. Plantings will include Sugar Maple, Littleleaf Linden, Birch, Juniper, Crabapple, White Pine, Pin Oak, Lilac and Cranberry. The applicant should provide dense evergreen plantings along the southerly boundary as required under Section 25.108 of the zoning regulations. Traffic: A traffic impact evaluation report was submitted and reviewed by the Planning Commission at preliminary plat. This report concludes that "with respect to traffic congestion, the results of the intersection capacity analyses indicate that this project will not create any significant traffic during future design hour conditions at all intersections included in this study. " The study recommended that site grading be designed to enhance available intersection sight lines from the proposed access. The study indicates that a signal will not be warranted at the Swift Street/Farrell Street intersection. The trip generation assessment should be revised to reflect the reduced building size. ITE estimates that the proposed office building with a drive - through bank will generate 130.1 additional vte's during the P.M. peak hour. The applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is approximately $26,000. Memorandum - Planning July 15, 1997 agenda items July 11, 1997 page 6 Building height: The applicant is proposing a 51.0 foot height for the office building and seeking a waiver for the additional 16 feet of height under Section 25.113 (c) of the zoning regulations. This section allows the Commission to approve a height in excess of the 35 foot limitation provided the Commission determines that a taller structure: (i) will not affect adversely the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (ii) will not detract from the important scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of -way. The Commission at preliminary plat granted the height waiver (preliminary plat condition #10) Section 25.113 (d) of the zoning regulations requires additional setbacks for each foot above the normal 35 foot height. These additional setback requirements are met. Sewer: The ad itional sewer allocation needed for this project is 840 gpd (this !*@4twk-.s credits given for the removal of two (2) houses on the property). There is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The applicant currently has excess capacity at his 60 Farrell Street project and is requesting that the Commission modify its policy to allow the transfer of the unused capacity of 1143 gpd to this project. The sewer policy was amended on 6/17/97 to accommodate this request. P.U.D. report: A report addressing the PUD criteria under Section 26.151 of the zoning regulations was submitted. Sidewalk/street widening: The plans show a proposed sidewalk which ' would extend westerly from the terminus of the existing sidewalk along the project's frontage. The plan shows a reserved strip to be dedicated to the City for the sidewalk and future street widening. A drawing is provided (sheet 1.1) showing the sidewalk/recreation path in front of the Couillard property within the Swift Street r.o.w. in the event that the necessary easements vL� are not obtained to cross this property as shown on the plan submitted. Recreation path: The Recreation Path Committee reviewed these plans and submitted comments. The Public Works Director has recommended that a concrete sidewalk Memorandum - Planning July 15, 1997 agenda items July 11, 1997 page 7 be provided. He has agreed to allow a five ( 5 ) foot paved path adjacent to the sidewalk similar to along Kennedy Drive. Lighting: Proposed exterior lights out will consist of the following: J --- 13 - 400 watt metal halide lamps with downcasting shielded fixtures on 20 foot poles. Details of proposed building mounted lights should be approved by the City Planner prior to permit issuance. Existing lighting at 85 Swift Street is as follows: --- four (4) 100 watt metal halide lamps with downcasting shielded fixtures mounted on 14 foot poles --- three (3) 400 watt metal halide lamps with downcasting shielded fixtures on 20 foot poles. --- five (5) metal halide lamps of unknown wattage mounted on the building with downcasting shielded fixtures. --- one (1) flood light of unknown type and wattage mounted on a 16 foot pole. Wetlands: The wetlands on the 85 Swift Street parcel have been delineated. (preliminary plat condition #12). The plan should indicate the amount of wetland impacted by fill. C.O. District: A C.O. District is shown along the crossing the 85 Swift Street parcel. The proposed internal access road will cross this C.O. District. This crossing of the C.O. District is permitted under Section 3.204 of the zoning regulations. Dumr)ster: The type of screening proposed for the dumpster is noted on the plan. (preliminary plat condition #4c). Notice of Condition: A "Notice of Condition" should be approved by the City Attorney and recorded in the land records prior to recording the final plat plans. This "Notice of Condition" should clearly indicate that for zoning and planning purposes the entire property will be regarded as a single parcel of land. ,f. Memorandum - Planning July 15, 1997 agenda items July 11, 1997 page 8 Other: --- plat should show the eight (8) foot strip along Swift Street to be reserved for further dedication. 8) FRANCIS VAN TURKOVICH & PATRICE STRATMANN - 3 LOT SUBDIVISION - PRELIMINARY PLAT This project consists of subdividing a 9.7 acre parcel into three (3) lots, two (2) lots of approximately (2) acres and one (1) lot of approximately 5.7 acres. The property is currently developed with a single family dwelling. The sketch plan was reviewed on 6/10/97 (minutes enclosed). This property located at 300 Swift Street lies within the R2 District. It is bounded on the north by a residence and undeveloped land, on the west by a church, on the east by a multi- family development (Ridgewood), and on the south by Swift Street. Access: Access to the two (2) new lots and an existing lot which is not part of this subdivision is to be provided by a 40 foot r.o.w. with a driveway of unknown width. Access to the UVM property to the north is to be provided by a 40 foot r.o.w. along the easterly boundary of the property. This r.o.w. should be shown as an easement/r.o.w. not a separate parcel. Plat should show the driveway to the existing house. Section 401.1 (k) (2) of the subdivision regulations requires that all private roadways be a minimum width of 30 feet with parking and 24 feet without parking. The width of the proposed private road is unknown. The Commission at the sketch plan meeting recommended a 20 foot wide drive. The applicant should address the sight line distances at the intersection of the new driveway with Swift Street. Lot size/frontage: The minimum lot size requirement of 19,000 square feet (0.44 acres) will be met by all three (3) lots. The minimum frontage requirement of 100 feet will be met by the two (2) lots fronting Swift Street. The third lot has no road frontage and will be served by an 40 foot r.o.w. Density: The maximum density permitted on this 9.7 acre lot is 19 units (9.7 x 2). Three (3) dwelling units are proposed. STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 660-2555 STEVEN F. STITZEL (802 FAX (802) 660-2552 PATTI R. PAGE' E-MAIL(FIRM2555 c AOL.COM) ROBERT E.FLETCHER JOSEPH S. McLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE ('ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) March 13, 1998 John Fitzpatrick, Esq. McCormick, Fitzpatrick, Kasper & Burchard, P.C. P.O. Box 638 Burlington, VT 05402-0638 Re: Couillard to City of South Burlington - Easement Dear John: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA I have enclosed an original Easement Deed and Vermont Property Transfer Tax Return for your clients' review and signature. Also enclosed is a copy of the plan referenced in the Easement Deed. If there are no objections to these documents, please have your clients sign the Easement Deed and Vermont Property Transfer Tax Return and return the same to this office. I will see to it that the executed original Easement Deed is recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. Sincerely, Timothy M. Eustace THE/maf Enclosures cc: Joe Weith° Son3567.cor STITZIEL, PAGE & FLETCHER. P.C. ATTOItVI:YS AT L:,W i-,i;%.Irua� HHA r B0v ,,''; EASEMENT DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that JIM DEAN COUILLARD, of East Calais, County of Washington, and State of Vermont, and JERRY LEE COUILLARD, of Milton, County of Chittenden, and State of Vermont, Grantors, in consideration of One Dollar, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and satisfaction of which are hereby acknowledged, to be paid to them by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipality located in Chittenden County, State of Vermont, Grantee, hereby GIVES, GRANTS, SELLS, CONVEYS and CONFIRMS unto the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for all purposes, including but not limited to, construction and maintenance of a street, construction and maintenance of a sidewalk or sidewalks, and construction and maintenance of a recreational pathway/bike lane, all of the foregoing improvements to be dedicated and devoted to use by the general public, over, on and through property of the Grantor located in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, and more particularly described as follows: A strip of land eight and one -quarter (8.25) feet in width located along the entire length of the northerly sideline of Grantors' property, known and numbered as 79 Swift Street, said strip of land having a sideline of one hundred twenty five (125) feet, more or less, along the southerly edge of the right-of-way of Swift Street, as the same is depicted on a plan entitled "Swift Street P.U.D., 57, 69 & 85 Swift Street Overall Site Plan, South Burlington, Vermont, Sheet 1," prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., dated April, 1997, last revised June 11, 1997, and recorded in Map Volume 404, at Page 53, of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Said strip of land being a portion of the land and premises conveyed to Jim Dean Couillard and Jerry Lee Couillard by Warranty Deed of John R. Couillard dated June 20, 1997, and of record in Volume 411 at Page 19 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, maintain, replace, patrol, level, fill, drain and pave said roadway, sidewalk and recreational pathway, including the right to install, maintain, repair and replace all necessary bridges, culverts, cuts, curbs and ramps, at its sole cost, expense and risk. By its recording of this Easement Deed, Grantee agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that any premises of Grantors lying outside the scope of the easement and right-of-way disturbed or affected by Grantee's exercise of the rights granted it hereunder shall be restored to their condition prior to such entry at Grantee's own cost and within a reasonable time, and acknowledges that it will indemnify and hold the Grantors harmless, to the full limits of liability insurance that Grantee customarily maintains, for any injury or damage resulting from the public use of said right-of-way not attributable to acts of the Grantors. Grantee, by the recording of this Easement Deed, acknowledges that this easement has been donated to the City of South Burlington, at no cost to the City, with the intent that Grantors shall receive the full benefit and protection of 19 V.S.A. Section 2309. For purposes of construction, a temporary easement and right-of- way extending five (5) feet south of the entire length of said permanent easement and right-of-way is hereby granted. Said temporary easement and right-of-way shall expire once construction is completed and the sidewalk/recreational pathway is open to the public. Grantors, their successors and assigns, shall have no right to enter upon, cross over or make use of the surface of so much of their property as is encumbered hereby, except insofar as the general public may make use thereof consistent with the intended purposes of said easement and right-of-way. Chittenden Trust Company joins in the execution of this deed for the sole purpose of subordinating the lien of a certain Mortgage S'I'IT11?L. PAGE k granted to it by Jim Dean Couillard and Jerry Lee Couillard dated FLETCHER.Pe. July 2, 1997, and of record at Volume 411, Page 21 of the City of ATD,L\f:vs VYLA, % South Burlington Land Records, to the permanent easement and ,,,,;,;, right-of-way described above and for no other purpose, and said 2 mortgage and the lien thereof is otherwise to be and to remain in full force and effect in accordance with the terms thereof. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plan and deeds and the records thereof, and the references therein made all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted rights and privileges in, upon and over said premises unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever; and Grantors do for themselves and their successors and assigns, covenant with Grantee and its successors and assigns, that Grantors are lawfully seized in fee simple of the aforesaid premises, that they are free from all encumbrances, that the Grantors have good right and title to sell and convey the same as aforesaid and that Grantors, and their successors and assigns shall Warrant and Defend the same to Grantee and its successors and assigns forever against the lawful claims and demands of all persons. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, JIM DEAN COUILLARD and JERRY LEE COUILLARD hereunto set their hands and seals this day of 1998. IN PRESENCE OF: Witness Witness STIT/.F;L. P-AGE K FI E.TCHEH. P.C. RC 1:11vt.l��A yI'I;AItsAT n Jim Dean Couillard Jerry Lee Couillard 3 sTI*1 ZI]I.. PAGF K F1.1;"1'C11EE. P.C. v,�rrr:r,� �ritrr:r I'. U. HUA ISu' W HLIAtffn A. A I.Il 11t;A'I STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At , Vermont, this day of , 1998, personally appeared Jim Dean Couillard, and he acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed. Before me, Notary Public My Commission expires: STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At , Vermont, this day of , 1998, personally appeared Jerry Lee Couillard, and he acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed. Before me, Notary Public My Commission expires: By: STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. CHITTENDEN TRUST COMPANY Duly Authorized Agent At on the day of , 1998, personally appeared , duly authorized agent of CHITTENDEN TRUST COMPANY, and he/she acknowledged this instrument by her/him, sealed and subscribed, to be his/her free act and deed, and the free act and deed of CHITTENDEN TRUST COMPANY. son124.cor Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 4 VERMONT PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RETURN VERMONT DEPARTMENT OF TAXES MONTPELIER, VERMONT 05609-1401 (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY) ffillSELLER'S (rRANSFEROR'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER IDENT. NO. Jim Dean Couillard Jerry Lee Couillard Kj BUYER'S (TRANSFEREE'S) NAME(S) COMPLETE MAILING ADDRESS FOLLOWING TRANSFER SOCIAL SECURITY NO. OR TAXPAYER (DENT. NO. City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street 03-6002712 South Burlington, VT 05403 PROPERTY LOCATION (Address In full) • DATE OF CLOSING 79 Swift Street, South Burlington, Vermont 05403 INTEREST IN PROPERTY ' 1. FEE SIMPLE 3. ❑ UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST S. ❑ TIME-SHARE ESTATE 7. EASEMENT 2. ❑ LIFE ESTATE 4. ❑ UNDIVIDED_% INTEREST 6. ❑ LEASE 8. ❑ OTHER FRONTAGE AND DEPTH TOTAL ACREAGE BUILDINGS ON PROPERTY AT THE TIME OF TRANSFER (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY). 1. ® NONE 5. ❑ BARN 9.❑r� STORE 2. ❑ FACTORY S. ❑ MULTI -FAMILY WITH INSERT DWELLING UNITS 100 OTHER ( ) TRANSFERRED DESCRIBE 3. ❑SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING 7. ❑MOBILE HOME NUMBER 4. ❑ CAMPNACATION HOME 8. ❑ CONDOMINIUM WITH ( INSERT ) UNITS TRANSFERRED r:U�6ER CHECK WHETHER THE BUILDINGS WERE EVER ❑ OCCUPIED ❑ RENTED ❑ WILL BE RENTED AFTER SALE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY BEFORE TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMPNACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. ❑ OTHER DE c"t DESCRIBE 2. ® OPEN LAND 4. ❑ TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USE 8. ❑ INDUSTRIAL DESCRIBE PRIMARY USE OF PROPERTY AFTER TRANSFER (CHECK ONE): 1. ❑ PRIMARY RESIDENCE 3. ❑ CAMPNACATION 5. ❑ OPERATING FARM 7. ❑ COMMERCIAL 9. ®0 HER Pathl OCS CRIBL DCE RIBL 2. 1-1OPENLAND 4. El TIMBERLAND 6. ❑ GOVERNMENT USES. ❑ INDUSTRIAL Easemen DESCRIBE IS ANY PORTION OF THE LAND BEING CONVEYED SUBJECT TO A LIEN OR OTHER RESTRICTIONS UNDER CHAPTER 124 OF 32 V.S.A. (Agricultural, Forest, Farmland or Working Farmland Tax Abatement Use Value Appralsal Programs)? ❑ Yes ® No IF TRANSFER IS EXEMPT FROM PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS AND COMPLETE SECTIONS M, N and 0 BELOW. #2 TOTAL PRICE PAID FOR ` PRICE PAID FOR PRICE PAID S 0 PERSONAL PROPERTY S REAL PROPERTY $ IF PRICE PAID FOR REAL PROPERTY IS LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE ENTER FAIR MARKET VALUE ON LINE 0 AND DESCRIBE THE CIRCUMSTANCES: DUE: Enter amount from rate schedule on reverse side. COMPLETE RATE SCHEDULE FOR ALL TRANSFERS r,F S 0 SELLERACOUIRED 6/20/97 VERMONT LAND GAINS TAX RETURN IS NOT BEING FILED, CITE EXEMPTION FROM INSTRUCTIONS ON PAGE 4 OF THIS BOOKLET #1 0 (CONTINUE ON REVERSE SIDE) THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY TOWN OR CITY CLERK TO WNICITY DATE OF RECORD BOOK NUMBER PAGE NO. _ LISTED VALUE S GRAND LIST OF 19 PARCEL ID OR MAP NO. GRAND LIST CATEGORY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TOWN NUMBER RETURN RECEIVED (INCLUDING CERTIFICATES AND, IF REQUIRED, ACT 250 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT) AND TAX PAID. SIGNED DATE CLERK Form PT-1 (IZV2) RATE SCHEDULE i. Tax on Special Rate Property: ■. Value of purchaser's principal resldenca (not to exceed SlID0,000) (See Instructions) ............. »................ _........................... 1. a $ b. Value of property enrolled In current use program ........ ».......... ».... ».......................................................................................... b. S c. Value of qualified working farm ....................... ..... ...................... ».».».................... .... »......................... ».... ............................... c. S d. Add Linea 1(s), (b) and (c)............................................................. ».»...................................................................... ».................. . d. S a. Tax Me........»....».......».».».......................................................... »............. _..................................................................................... e. f. Tax due on Special Rate Property. Multiply Line 1(d) by Line 1(e)»............................. ............................................................ f. S 2. Tax on General Rate Property: a. Enter amount from Line 0 on front of return ...................................... ........................................................................................... 2. a. $ b. Enter amount from Line 1(d) of Rate Schedule above................................................................................................................. b. $ c. Subtract Line 2(b) from Line 2(a).............. »........... ................ »....... ».»......................................................................................... c. $ d. Tax rate ............... .... »........................................................................................................................................................................ d. e. Tax due on General Rats Property: Multiply Line 2(c) by Line 2(d)............................................................................................ e. S 3. Total Tax Due: Add Lines 1(f) and 2(s) and enter here and on Line P on front of return................................................................................... 3. $ 0 FLOOD AND SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AND ACT 250 CERTIFICATES Buyer(s) and Sslier(s) certify as follows: N/A - Easement A. That they have Investigated and disclosed to every party to this transaction all of their knowledge relating to flood regulations, If any, affecting the property. B. That the seller(*) advised the buyers) that local and state building regulatlona, zoning regulations and subdivision regulations pertaining to the property may limit significantly the use of the property. C. That this transfer Is in compliance with or Is exempt from the subdivision regulations of the Agency of Natural Resources for the following reasons: 1. This property is the subject of Subdivision Permit No. and is In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property and any retained parcel Is exempt from the subdivision regulations because (see Instructions for exemptions): a. Parcel to be sold: Exemption Number Number of acres b. Parcel retalned: Exemption Number Number of acres Please contact the district office In your area to determine compliance with Act 250. (See map on page 26.) Seller(s) further certifies as follows: D. That this transfer of ran prparty and any development thereon Is in compliance with or exempt from 10 V.S.A. Chapter 151, Vermont's Land Use and is� Dav ent Law 90), for the following reason: 1. This property Is the subject of Act 250 Permit No. and Is In compliance with said permit, or 2. This property Is exempt from Act 250 because: (list exemption number from Instructions) E. That this transfer d odoes not (strike one) result in a partltlon or division of land. Note: If it does, an Act 250 Disclosure Statement must be attached to this return before ng with the town clerk. WITHHOLDING CERTIFICATION ❑ Buyer(s) certifies that Vermont Income tax has been withheld from the purchase price and will be remitted to the Commissioner of Taxes with Form REW-1 within 30 days from the transfer, OR that the transfer is exempt from income tax withholding for the following reason (check one): ® 1. Seiler(s) certifies that at that time of transfer, each seller was a resident of Vermont or an estate. ❑ 2. Buyers) certifies that the parties obtained withholding certificate no.---_ from the Commissioner Of Taxes In advance of this sale. ❑ 3. Buyer(s) certifies that this is a transfer without consideration. (See Instructions for Form REW-1.) ❑ 4. Seller(s) Is a mortgagor conveying the mortgaged property to a mortgagee in a foreclosure or transfer in lieu of foreclosure, with no addltionaf consideration. WE HEREBY SWEAR AND AFFIRM THAT THIS RETURN, INCLUDING ALL CERTiRCATES, IS TRUE, CORRECT AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE SELLER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE BUYER(S) SIGNATURE(S) DATE CITY OF SOUTH BURLING'I'ON Jim oui ar By: Jerry Lee Coui lar I I Duly Authorized Agent Preparer's Signature Prepared by Timothy M. Eustace, Esq. Stitzel, Page & Fletcher, P.C. PO Box 1507 Preparer's Address Burlington, VT 05402-1507 Buyer's Representative Tel. (Prim or Type) —up a copy c7� mis return Tor your r&coros. KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that JIM DEAN COUILLARD, of East Calais, County of Washington, and state of Vermont, and JERRY LZZ COUILLARD, of Milton, County of Chittenden, and State of Vermont, Grantors, in consideration of One Dollar, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and satisfaction of which are hereby acknowledged, to be paid to them by the CITY Or SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipality located in Chittenden County, State of Vermont, Grantee, hereby GIVES, GRANTS, SELLS, CONV$YS and CONFIRMS unto the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual aasement and right-of-way for all purposes, including but not limitad to, co„aLruction and maintenance of a atraat, and maintenance of a sidewalk or sidewalks, and construction and maintenance of a recreational pathway/bike lane, all of the foregoing improvements to be dedicated and devoted to use by the general public, over, on and through property of the grantor located in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and state of Vermont, and more particularly described as followet A strip of land eight and one -quarter (8.25) feet in width located along the entire length of the northerly sideline of Grantors, property, known and numbered as 79 Swift Street, said strip of land having a sideline of one hundred twenty five (125) feet, more or leas, along the southerly edge of the right-of-way of Swift Street, as the same is depicted on a plan entitled "swift sheet P.U.D., 57, 69 & 85 Swift Street Overall Site Plan, south Burlington, Vermont, Sheet 1," prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., dated April, 1997, last revised June 11, 1997, and recorded in Map Volume , at Page ,,,_, of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Said strip of land being a portion of the land and premises conveyed to Jim Dean Couillard and Jerry Lee Couillard by Warranty Deed of John R. Iouillard datad June 20, 1997, and of record in Volume 411 at Page 19 of 'is City of South Burlington Land Records. antes, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to construct, T�{6Jl/ iconstruct, repair, maintain, replace, patrol, level, fill, drain and me said roadway, sidewalk and recreational pathway, including the ,ght to install, maintain, repair and replace all necessary bridges, lverts, cuts, curbs and ramps, at its sole cost, expense and risk. 71 30vd-;0Vcl4i3Z�L:_. 6^ ;CSW L6 . 61 AON By its recording of this Easement Deed, Grantee agrees, for itself and its successor.* and assigns, that any premises of Grantors lying outside the scope of the easement and right-of-way disturbed or affected by Grantee's exercise of the rights granted it hersundQr shall be restored to their condition prior to such Gantry at Grantee's own cost and within a reasonable time, and acknowledges that it will indemnify and hold the Grantors harmless, to the full limits of liability insurance that Grantee Customarily maintains, for any injury or damage resulting from the public use of said right-of-way not attributable to acts of the Grantors. Grantee, by the recording of this Easement Deed, acknowledges that this easement has been donated to the City of South Burlington, at no coat to the City, with the intent that Grantors shall receive the full benefit and protection of 19 V.S.A. Section 2309. For purposes of construction, a temporary easement and right-of-way extending five (5) feet south of the entire length of said permanent easement and right-of-way is hereby granted. said temporary easement and right-of-way shall expire once construction is completed and the sidewalk/recreational pathway is open to the public. Grantors, their auccesscr3 sr,'-Taigns, shall have no right to enter upon, cross over or make use of the surface of so much of their property as is encumbered hereby, except insofar as the general public may make use thereof consistent with the intended purposes of said easement and right-of-way. Chittenden Trust Company joins in the execution of this dead for the sole purpose of subordinating the lien of a certain Mortgage granted to it by Jim Dean Couillard and Jerry Lee Couillard dated July 2, 1997, and of record at volume 411, Page 21 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, to the permanent easement and right-of-way described above and for no other purpose, and said mortgage and the lien thereof is otherwise to be and to remain in full force and effect in accordance with the terms thereof. Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. joins in the execution of this deed for the sole purpose of subordinating an easement acquired by Deed of Easement for Culvert Pipelines dated July 22, 1986 and recorded in Volume 216, Pages 24-25 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, to the temporary and permanent easements granted herein. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plan and deeds and the records thereof, sad the references therein made all in further aid of this description. To BAVN ;L%M TO HOLD the above granted rights and privileges in, upon and aver said premises unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever; and Grantors do for themselves and their successors and assigns, covenant with Grantee and its successors and assigns, that Grantors are lawfully seized in K 3^•F/i `FI -3Z 1 7 S SE 60 (C3M% L6 , 6I AOh fee simple of the aforesaid premises, that they are free from all encumbrances, that the Crantors have good right and title to sell and convey the same as aforesaid and that Grantors, and their successors and assigns shall Warrant and Defend the same to Grantee and its successors and assigne forever against the lawful claims and demands of all persons. IN MITNEss WHEREOF, JIM DEAN COUILLARD and J73"Y LEE COUILLARD hereunto set their hands and seals this day of August, 1997. IN FRESENC! OF: Witness Witness aTATZ OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CRITTENDEN" SS. Jim Dean Couillard Jerry Lee couillard At Vermont, this day of August, 1997, personally appeared Jim Dean couillard, and he acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed. Before me, Notary Public My Commission expires: STATIC OF VXRMONT COUNTY OF CffITTZXDEN, 95. At , Vermont, this day of August, 1997, personally appeared Jerry Leo Couillard, and he acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed. Before me, Notary Public my Commission expires: ILI 3 �Od S0V'iV ---Z 11a 96 - 60 (CZA) L6 . 6; AOH VERMONT GAS SYST048, INC. SyS Witneas Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENvZN, Si. At Vermont, this day of August, 1997, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS, INC., and he/she acknowledged this instrument by him/her sealed and subscribed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of VERMONT CAS SYSTEMS, INC. CRITTENDEN TRUST COMPANY By$ Duly Authorised Agent STATE of VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDICN, SS. At on the day of August, 1997, personally appeared , duly authorized agent of CHITTENDER TRUST COMPANY, and he/she acknowledged this instrument by her/him, sealed and subscribed, to be his/her free act and deed, and the free act and deed of CHITTENDEN TRUST COMPANY. SON108Ia" Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 4 S Z"Dvd S")vi 7ZZ I:S 99 60 'CZEA) L6 . 6: 'A0N r) vT Jc tiL Memo To: Steve Stitzel, City Attorney From: Joe Weith, City Planner Subject: Sidewal"ike Path Easement Date: July 16, 1997 The City would like you to please draft an easement for a combination sidewalk/bicycle path along the frontage of the property located at 79 Swift Street (see enclosed plan). The property is owned by John R. Coulliard, Jim Dean and Jerry Lee. The easement will consist of an 8.25 strip of land along the entire frontage of the property. A 10 foot wide sidewalk/bicycle path (5' of concrete and 5' of pavement, similar to Dorset Street) will be constructed in the easement and partially in the City R.O.W. The sidewak/bicycle path will be maintained by the City. The landowner wants to make sure that he is not liable. However, Chuck Hafter has indicated that he does not want to give full indemnification. I will be on vacation, so please send the easement and direct any questions to Chuck. (Spf7-16) State of Vermont WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER DISPOSAL PERMIT LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Environmental Protection Rules Effective August 8, 1996 Case Number: WW-4-1100 PIN: EJ97-0281 Landowner: Daniel Morrissey Address: 60 Farrell Street South Burlington, VT 05403 This project, consisting of removing two existing residential buildings and constructing a 39,000 square foot office building with a maximum of 170 employees on the "Daniel Morrissey Lot" referenced in Subdivision Permit EC-4-2085, served by municipal water and sewer services, located off Swift Street in the city of South Burlington, Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL This permit does not relieve the permittee from obtaining all other approvals and permits as may be required from the Department of Labor and Industry -phone (802) 828-2106 or (802) 658-2199 and local officials prior to proceeding with this project. 2. The project shall be completed as shown on the following plans which have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division: Project No. 97150 Sheet 1 "Overall Site Plan" dated April 1997 last revised 6-11-97, Sheet IA "Site Plan" dated April 1997 last revised 7-8-97; and Sheet 3 "Water and Sewer Details" (only for sewer details) dated April 1997 prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc.. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. No alterations to the building that would change or affect the exterior water supply or sewage disposal, or the approved use of the building shall be allowed without prior review and approval from the Agency of Natural Resources. 4. The Wastewater Management Division now reviews the sewage and water systems for public buildings under 10 V.S.A., Chapter 61 - Water Supply and Wastewater Disposal Permit. By acceptance of this permit, the permittee agrees to allow representatives of the State of Vermont access to the property covered by the permit, at reasonable times, for the purpose of ascertaining compliance with Vermont environmental/health statutes and regulations, with this permit. Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal Permit WW-4-1100 Daniel Morrissey Page 2 6. All conditions set forth in Subdivision Permit #EC-4-2085 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. 7. A copy of the approved plans and this permit shall remain on the project during all phases of construction and, upon request, shall be made available for inspection by State or local personnel. WATER SUPPLY 8. The project is approved for water supply by connection to the municipal water system. No other means of obtaining potable water shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division. 9. The water main extension is approved provided the water main extension is constructed in strict accordance with the Agency of Natural Resources, Water Supply Division's "Public Water System Permit to Construct " Project 9E-0747 WSID 95091 to Daniel Morrissey dated September 11, 1997. SEWAGE DISPOSAL 10. The project is approved for wastewater disposal by connection to the municipal sewer system for a maximum of 840 gallons of sewage per day. No other method of wastewater disposal shall be allowed without prior review and approval by the Wastewater Management Division, and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont on October 31, 1997. Canute E. Dalmasse, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission & Select Board Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Department of Labor & Industry Water Supply Division 1 9 �Qn� M Mdl. 1��- � 3Uo of S.embgN IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATIONNt0 (SI DEWALK/RECREATION PATH) This Agreement, by and between DANIEL B. MORRISSEY of Shelburne, Vermont (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"), and the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON (hereinafter referred to as "Municipality"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Municipality's Planning Commission has approved a final plat entitled "Swift Street P.U.D. Property of Daniel Morrissey & Vermont Gas South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., dated June 1997, and recorded in Map Volume 0� , Page ;5� of the City of South Burlington Land Records; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission authorizes the Owner to transfer a sidewalk/recreation path (the "Path") to be constructed by Owner along frontage of Owner's property, as well as conveying to Municipality an easement for the Path over and across Owner's property; and WHEREAS, the above described lands and/or interests therein are to be dedicated to the Municipality free and clear of all encumbrances; and WHEREAS, the Owner has delivered to the Municipality an appropriate deed of conveyance for the above -described lands and/or interests therein. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the final approval of the Municipality's Planning Commission and for other good and valuable consideration, it is covenanted and agreed as follows: 1. Owner herewith shall cause to be delivered to the Municipality a deed of conveyance for the Path as it passes over and across the Owner's property an unexecuted copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, said delivery constituting a formal Offer of Dedication to the Municipality to be held by the Municipality until the acceptance or rejection of said Offer of Dedication by the legislative body of the Municipality. 2. The Owner agrees that said formal Offer of Dedication is irrevocable, and can be accepted by the Municipality at any time. 3. This Irrevocable Offer of Dedication shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all assigns, grantees, successors and/or heirs of the Owner and upon all successors and assigns of Municipality. �17 Dated this �day of October, 1997. IN THE PRESENCE OF: Z , fl—�, Witness STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At Burlington this day of October, 1997, personally appeared Daniel B. Morrissey, and acknowledged the foregoing instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his own free act and deed. Before me, 41(-" Notary Public My Commission Expires: 2/10/99 2 IN THE PRESENCE OF: a, Witness STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. At South Burlington C 6e e-.� ��L4 tiG�w Duly acknowledged the foregoing act and deed and the free ac CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON By: Q �au:4j= Its Duly Authori ed Agent -t-h this -�D day of October, 1997, personally appeared Authorized Agent of the City of South,. Burlington and instrument by hi :and deed of the My Commission Expires: 2/10/99 Before me, 3 m sealed and subscribed, to be his own free City of South Burlington.:; Notary Public EXi..BIT A TO OFFER OF DEDICAT1,,N FROM DANIEL B. MORRISSEY TO CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT ERSON WADHAMS QUINN & YATES LAW OFFICES I SOUTH UNION STREET IRLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 EASEMENT DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that DANIEL B. MORRISSEY, of Shelburne, County of Chittenden, and State of Vermont, Grantor, in consideration of One Dollar, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and satisfaction of which are hereby acknowledged, to be paid to him by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipality located in Chittenden County, State of Vermont, Grantee, hereby GIVES, GRANTS, SELLS, CONVEYS and CONFIRMS unto the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual easement and right-of- way for the construction and maintenance of a street, construction and maintenance of a sidewalk or sidewalks, and construction and maintenance of a recreational pathway/bike lane, all of the foregoing improvements to be dedicated and devoted to use by the general public, over, on and through property of the Grantor located in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, and more particularly described as follows: A strip of land eight and one -quarter (8.25) feet in width located along the entire length of the northerly sidelines of the following properties of Grantor: (i) known and numbered as 69 Swift Street, said strip of land having a sideline of two hundred feet (200'), more or less, along the southerly edge of the right-of-way of Swift Street; (ii) known and numbered as 57 Swift Street and 50 Swift Street, said strip of land having a sideline of one hundred feet (100), more or less, along the southerly edge of the right-of-way of Swift Street, as the same are depicted on a plan entitled "Boundary Line Adjustment Between Mark P. Stevens and Dan Morrissey Albert and Marie St: Amand Swift Street, South Burlington, Vermont" dated April 11, 1997, last revised September 4, 1997, prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. and recorded in Map Volume _, Page _ of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Said strip of land is a portion of the land and premises conveyed to Daniel B. Morrissey by the following instruments: (a) Limited Warranty Deed from The Merchants Bank dated September 4, 1996 and recorded in Volume 398, Pages 224-225 of the City of South Burlington Land Records; and, (b) Warranty Deeds from Mark P. Stevens and Leah M. Britch each dated August 13, 1997 and recorded in Volume 412, Pages 506 and 507, respectively, of the City of South Burlington Land Records. ERSON WADHAMS QUINN & YATES LAW OFFICES 3 SOUTH UNION STREET Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, maintain, replace, patrol, level, fill, drain and pave said roadway, sidewalk and recreational pathway, including the right to install, maintain, repair and replace all necessary bridges, culverts, cuts, curbs and ramps, at its sole cost, expense and risk. By its recording of this Easement Deed, Grantee agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that any premises of Grantor lying outside the scope of the easement and right-of- way disturbed or affected by Grantee's exercise of the rights granted it hereunder shall be restored to their condition prior to such entry at Grantee's own cost and within a reasonable time, and acknowledges that it will indemnify and hold the Grantors harmless, to the full limits of liability insurance that Grantee customarily maintains, for any injury or damage resulting from the public use of said right-of-way not attributable to acts of the Grantors. Grantee, by the recording of this Easement Deed, acknowledges that this easement has been donated to the City of South Burlington, at no cost to the City, with the intent that Grantors shall receive the full benefit and protection of 19 V.S.A. Section 2309. For purposes of constructing the sidewalk(s) and recreational pathway/bike lane, a temporary easement and right-of-way extending five (5) feet, south of the entire length of said permanent easement and right-of-way is hereby granted. Said temporary easement and right-of-way shall expire once construction is completed and the sidewalk/recreational pathway is open to the public. Grantor, his successors and assigns, shall have no right to enter upon, cross over or make use of the surface of so much of his property as is encumbered hereby, except such entry upon, crossing over, and use of the surface is permitted: (i) to install, repair, maintain, replace, restore or remove utility lines of all types to serve improvements which may be constructed on parcels of land presently designated as 69 Swift Street, 63 Swift Street, 59 Swift Street, 57 Swift Street, and 50 Swift Street. Grantor, for himself and his successors and assigns hereby covenants that he will not erect or permit any building, landscaping, or other improvements upon said easement area which, in the judgment of Grantee, and its successors and assigns, might materially interfere with the proper maintenance and repair of said sidewalk(s) and recreational pathway (bike lane); (ii) for ingress and egress to the parcels of land presently designated as Nos. 63, 69, 59, 57 and 50 Swift Street; and (iii) insofar as the general public may make use thereof consistent with the intended purposes of said easement and right of way. Grantor, for himself and his successors and assigns agrees that any portion of the easement area affected by his use of same as permitted hereinabove shall be restored as nearly as practicable to its condition prior to such entry at Grantor's own cost and within a reasonable time. The Howard Bank, N.A. joins in the execution of this deed for the sole purpose of subordinating the lien of a certain Mortgage granted to it by Daniel B. Morrissey dated August 13, 1997, and of record at Volume 412, Pages 508-14 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, to the permanent easement and right-of-way described above and for no other purpose, and said mortgage and the lien thereof is otherwise to be and to remain in full force and effect in accordance with the terms thereof. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plan and deeds and the records thereof, and the references therein made all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted rights and privileges in, upon and over said premises unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever; and Grantor does for himself and his successors and assigns, covenant with Grantee and its successors aid assigns, that Grantor is lawfully seized in fee simple of the aforesaid premises, that they are free from all encumbrances, that the Grantor has good right and title to sell and convey the same as aforesaid and that Grantor, and his successors and assigns shall Warrant and Defend the JRLINGTON. VERMONT 05401 same to Grantee and its successors and assigns forever against the lawful claims and demands of all persons. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor hereunto sets his hand and seal this day of October, 1997. IN THE PRESENCE OF: tness STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. Daniel B. Morrissey At Burlington this day of October, 1997, Daniel B. Morrissey, personally appeared, and he acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed to be his free act. Before me My commission expires: 2/ 10/99 Notary Public IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Howard Bank, N.A. hereunto sets its hand and seal this _ day of October, 1997. IN THE PRESENCE OF: THE HOWARD BANK, N.A. By: Witness Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At Burlington this day of October, 1997, , Duly Authorized Agent of The Howard Bank, N.A. personally appeared, and he acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed to be his free act and the free act and deed of The Howard Bank, N.A. My commission expires: 2/10/99 :)N WADHAMS VN & YATES \W OFFICES TH UNION STREET GTON, VERMONT 05401 Before me Notary Public i I t 8 0MCIa 3 C O to 9 9 a h► Md. on per- �--1° -� IRREVOCABLE OFFER OF DEDICATI*,* (SIDEWALKIRECREATION PATH) iMsr"W A Picard,CftC+ This Agreement, by and between DANIEL B. MORRISSEY of Shelburne, Vermont (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"), and the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON (hereinafter referred to as "Municipality"). WIT NESSETH: WHEREAS, the Municipality's Planning Commission has approved a final plat entitled "Swift Street P.U.D. Property of Daniel Morrissey & Vermont Gas South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., dated June 1997, and recorded in Map Volume 0� Page .5-4 of the City of South Burlington Land Records; and WHEREAS, the final approval of the Planning Commission authorizes the Owner to transfer a sidewalk/recreation path (the "Path") to be constructed by Owner along frontage of Owner's property, as well as conveying to Municipality an easement for the Path over and across Owner's property; and WHEREAS, the above described lands and/or interests therein are to be dedicated to the Municipality free and clear of all encumbrances; and WHEREAS, the Owner has delivered to the Municipality an appropriate deed of conveyance for the above -described lands and/or interests therein. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the final approval of the Municipality's Planning Commission and for other good and valuable consideration, it is covenanted and agreed as follows: 1 1. Owner herewith shall cause to be delivered to the Municipality a deed of conveyance for the Path as it passes over and across the Owner's property an unexecuted copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, said delivery constituting a formal Offer of Dedication to the Municipality to be held by the Municipality until the acceptance or rejection of said Offer of Dedication by the legislative body of the Municipality. 2. The Owner agrees that said formal Offer of Dedication is irrevocable, and can be accepted by the Municipality at any time. 3. This Irrevocable Offer of Dedication shall run with the land and shall be binding upon all assigns, grantees, successors and/or heirs of the Owner and upon all successors and assigns of Municipality. '7� Dated this 3v day of October, 1997. IN THE PRESENCE OF: c L i ness STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. Daniel B. Morri At Burlington this day of October, 1997, personally appeared Daniel B. Morrissey, and acknowledged the foregoing instrument by hi sealed and subscrib d, to be his own free act and deed. Before me ary Public My Commission Expires: 2/10/99 2 IN THE PRESENCE OF: Witness STATE OF VERMONT CHITTENDEN COUNTY, SS. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON By: Its Duly Authorized Agent At South Burlington this 30 day of October, 1997, personally appeared CI p,k\e5 HAEjek , Duly Authorized Agent of the City of South Burlington and acknowledged the foregoing instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his own free. act and deed and the free act and deed of the City of South Burlington. Before me, Notar Public My Commission Expires: 2/10/99 �. 3 EXHIBIT A SON WADHAMS UINN & YATES LAW OFFICES JUTH UNION STREET EASEMENT DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that DANIEL B. MORRISSEY, of Shelburne, County of Chittenden, and State of Vermont, Grantor, in consideration of One Dollar, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and satisfaction of which are hereby acknowledged, to be paid to him by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipality located in Chittenden County, State of Vermont, Grantee, hereby GIVES, GRANTS, SELLS, CONVEYS and CONFIRMS unto the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual easement and right-of- way for the construction and maintenance of a street, construction and maintenance of a sidewalk or sidewalks, and construction and maintenance of a recreational pathway/bike lane, all of the foregoing improvements to be dedicated and devoted to use by the general public, over, on and through property of the Grantor located in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, and more particularly described as follows: A strip of land eight and one -quarter (8.25) feet in width located along the entire length of the northerly sideline of Grantor's property known and numbered as 59 Swift Street, said strip of land having a sideline of fifty feet (50'), more or less, along the southerly edge of the right-of-way of Swift Street, as the same are depicted on a plan entitled "Boundary Line Adjustment Between Mark P. Stephens and Dan Morrissey Albert and Marie St. Amand Swift Street, South Burlington, Vermont" dated April 11, 1997, last revised September 4, 1997, prepared by Krebs & Lansing Consulting Engineers, Inc. and recorded in Map Volume Page _ of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Said strip of land is a portion of the land and premises conveyed to Daniel B. Morrissey by the Warranty Deed from Albert L. St. Amand, Jr. and Marie St. Amand dated October _, 1997 and recorded in Volume _, Pages _-_ of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, maintain, replace, patrol, level, fill, drain and pave said roadway, sidewalk and recreational pathway, including the right to install, maintain, repair and replace all necessary bridges, culverts, cuts, curbs and ramps, at its sole cost, expense and risk. By its recording of this Easement Deed, Grantee agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that any premises of Grantor lying outside the scope of the easement and right-of- .INGTON, VERMONT 05401 �N WADHAMS IN & YATES W OFFICES fH UNION STREET way disturbed or affected by Grantee's exercise of the rights granted it hereunder shall be .restored to their condition prior to such entry at Grantee's own cost and within a reasonable time, and acknowledges that it will indemnify and hold the Grantors harmless, to the full limits of liability insurance that Grantee customarily maintains, for any injury or damage resulting from the public use of said right-of-way not attributable to acts of the Grantors. Grantee, by the recording of this Easement Deed, acknowledges that this easement has been donated to the City of South Burlington, at no cost to the City, with the intent that Grantors shall receive the full benefit and protection of 19 V.S.A. Section 2309. For purposes of constructing the sidewalk(s) and recreational pathway/bike lane, a temporary easement and right-of-way extending five (5) feet, south of the entire length of said permanent easement and right-of-way is hereby granted. Said temporary easement and right-of-way shall expire once construction is completed and the sidewalk/recreational pathway is open to the public. Grantor, his successors and assigns, shall have no right to enter upon, cross over or make use of the surface of so much of his property as is encumbered hereby, except such entry upon, crossing over, and use of the surface is permitted: (i) to install, repair, maintain, replace, restore or remove utility lines of all types to serve improvements which may be constructed on parcels of land presently designated as 69 Swift Street, 63 Swift Street, 59 Swift Street, 57 Swift Street, and 50 Swift Street. Grantor, for himself and his successors and assigns hereby covenants that he will not erect or permit any building, landscaping, or other improvements upon said easement area which, in the judgment of Grantee, and its successors and assigns, might materially interfere with the proper maintenance and repair of said sidewalk(s) and recreational pathway (bike lane); (ii) for ingress and egress to the parcels of land presently designated as Nos. 63, 69, 59, 57 and 50 Swift Street; and (iii) insofar as the general public may make use thereof consistent with the intended purposes of said easement and right of way. Grantor, for himself and his successors and assigns agrees that any portion of the easement area affected by his use of same as permitted hereinabove shall be restored as nearly as practicable to its condition prior to such entry at Grantor's own cost and within a reasonable time. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plan and deeds and the records thereof, and the references therein made all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted rights and privileges in, upon and over said premises unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever; and Grantor does for himself and his successors and assigns, covenant with Grantee and its successors and assigns, that Grantor is lawfully seized in fee simple of the aforesaid premises, that they are free from all encumbrances, that the Grantor has good right and title to sell and convey the same as aforesaid and that Grantor, and his successors and assigns shall Warrant and Defend the same to Grantee and its successors and assigns forever against the lawful claims and demands of all persons. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor hereunto sets his hand and seal this day of October, 1997. A4 IN THE PRESENCE OF: Witness Daniel B. Morrissey ;TON, VERMONT OS401 STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At Burlington this day of October, 1997, Daniel B. Morrissey, personally appeared, and he acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed to be his free act and deed. My commission expires: 2/10/99 ON WADHAMS INN & YATES AW OFFICES JTH UNION STREET 4GTON, VERMONT 05401 Before me Notary Public iMlFdad In got._ on I )f So. BUMON tAd 3fl NOTICE OF CONDITIONS OF Whist - -- t13004, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL &ft",t*q" WHEREAS, Vermont Gas Systems, Inc., a Vermont corporation with its principal place of business in South Burlington, Vermont, is the owner of certain improved property at 85 Swift Street consisting of 4.27 acres of land more or less ("Parcel B") and Daniel B. Morrissey of Shelburne, Vermont is the owner of unimproved property at 57, 63 and 69 Swift Street, collectively consisting of 2.24 acres of land, more or less ("Parcel A"). ("Owners"). WHEREAS, Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. and Daniel B. Morrissey (hereafter collectively "Owners") obtained approval from the South Burlington Planning Commission ("The Commission") on August 14, 1997, for a planned unit development ("PUD") consisting of two legally subdivided parcels of land depicted as "Parcel A #69" and "Parcel B #85" on a plat entitled "Swift Street P.U.D. 57, 69 & 85 Swift Street Overall Site Plan South Burlington, Vermont" prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. dated April, 1997,. last revised 6/11/97 and recorded in Map Book` A, Page s3 of the City of South Burlington Land Records ("the Property"). WHEREAS, the Commission's approval imposes certain conditions on the Property; NOW THEREFORE, Owners hereby give notice that the Property is subject to the following conditions and restrictions which shall run with and be binding upon the Property unless or until modified or removed by the Commission or its successor: 1. The Property shall be developed and used in accordance with the terms and conditions of the approval of the South Burlington Planning Commission granted on August 14, 1997. 2. The Property is and shall constitute a single parcel of land for purposes of compliance with City of South Burlington regulations and ordinances now in effect or hereafter amended or adopted, including zoning and subdivision regulations. Owners covenant and agree that for purpose of compliance with and application of City of South Burlington ordinances and regulations, including zoning and subdivision regulations, the Property shall continue to be regarded as a single parcel of land, even if title of Parcel A and Parcel B remains with different owners. 3. Any future application for an amendment or modification affecting one or both of the parcels comprising the PUD shall be deemed an amendment or modification to the PUD as a whole, and the Commission shall evaluate and render a decision in context of the entire PUD, not merely on the impacts that relate to the parcel for which the amendment or modification is specifically proposed. 4. Nothing in this notice or the conditions or covenants contained herein shall be construed to prevent the conveyance, lease, assignment, mortgage, or other transfer of any interest in or to any one of Parcel A and Parcel B as separate and apart from the other parcel comprising the PUD. 5. The proper party for purposes of submitting applications for approval from time to time under City ordinances and regulations, including zoning and subdivision regulations, shall be all of the owners or an association as designated by all of the owners in a document duly executed and recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records. The City shall act upon any applications submitted by all of the owners or the association and shall not be required to resolve a dispute between the association and the owners as to the respective rights of the association and owners. It shall be the duty of the owners or the association to notify all others having an interest in the property that may be effected by the application proceedings of the commencement of such proceedings. 6. Any action to enforce any City ordinance or regulation, including zoning or subdivision regulations, against the Property or activities or events occurring on the Property shall be brought against the owners or the association. It shall be the duty of the owners or the association to notify all others having an interest in the property that may be effected by the enforcement proceedings of the commencement of such proceedings. Any decision in an enforcement proceeding, including a decision granting injunctive relief or penalties, shall be enforceable at the City's sole discretion against the owners, the association or the owner of any building within the Property. 7. This Notice of Conditions shall be recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records and shall be referred to in any deed conveying the Property or an interest in the Property. 8. This Notice of Conditions shall be binding upon the Owners and the Owners' successors and assigns. Dated at South Burlington, Vermont, this A-7Aday of October, 1997. IN THE PRESENCE OF: -4L a-ykr, 0 ga2::� ��ness VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS, INC. By: Its Duly Autho-rized Agent 2 STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At South Burlington, on this (_7 day of October, 1997, (CLed Duly Authorized Agent for Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. personally appeared, And they acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. Notary Public Dated at Burlington, Vermont this30P'day of October, 1997. Elizabeth A LeClair My Commission Expire, February 10. 1999 My Commission Expires: 2/10/99 IN THE PRESENCE OF: Z/L Witness STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. Daniel B. Morrissey, by and through his Attorney -in -Fact, Lewis K. Sussman t� At Burlington, on this -id day of October, 1997, Lewis K. Sussman, Attorney -in -Fact for Daniel B. Morrissey, appeared, and he acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Daniel B. Morris y. Notar Public My Commission Expires: 2/10/99 3 STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY" STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLI[vGTON, VERMONT 0540-4-1507 1802) 560.2555 (VOICETDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (602) 660-2552 PATTI R. PAOE• E-�i ii (FR�f2S55(d�AOL.COM) ROBERT & FLETCHE.R JOSEPH S. NvIMEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE (*ALSO ADMITTED LN N Y, ) FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL SHEET Date: October 9, 1997 To: Lewis K. Sussman, Esq. Fax: 863-2863 Re: Vt Gas/Morrissey Dev. Sender: Tim Eustace You should receive 5 page(s), including this cover sheet. If you do not receive all the pages, please call (802) 660-2555. MESSAGE OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W CERJNOSIA Lewie - I met with Ray Belair this afternoon. The City would like the Easement Deed for the Morrissey parcels to be in similar form to the document I drafted for the Couillard property. 5ee attached. Please review the document and let me know your thoughts. Thank you. - Tim P.S. The map reference you used in your draft deed is fine. cc: Ray Belair (w/encl.) SON3422.COR This message is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain inforna,lon that is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strict'y prohibited. if you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone (802.660-2555). Thank you. v KNOW ALL plASONs B% -rss p*.RzssNTS, that JIM DEAN COUILLARD, of East Calais, County of washingtcn, and State Of ve-_-non_, and JERRY LEE COUILLARD, of Milton, Ccu.-jty of Chittenden, and State oi' Vermont, Grantors, in consideration of one Dollar, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and satisfaction of which are hereby acknowledged, to be paid to .hem by the CITY OF SOUTH BTJRLxNGTON, a municipality located ir: Chittenden County, State of Vermont, Grantee, hereby GIVES, GRANTS, SELLS, CONVEYS and CONFIRMS unto the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BVRLINGTON, and its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for all purposes, including but not 'limited to, construction and maintenance of a street, construction and maintenance of a sidewalk or sidewalks, and construction and maintenance of a recreational pathway/bike lane, all of the foregoing improvements to be dedicated and devoted to use by the general public, over, on and through property of the Grantor located in the City of So-ath Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, and more particularly described as follows: A strip of land eight and one -quarter (8.25) feet in width located along the entire length of the northerly sideline of Grantors' property, known and numbered as 79 Swift Street, said strip of land having a sideline of one hundred twenty five (125) feet, more or less, along the southerly edge of the right-of-way of Swift Street, as the same is depicted on a plan entitled "Swift Street p.U.D., 57, 69 & 8s Swift Street overall site plan, South Burlington., Vermont, Sheet 1," prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., dated April, :.997, last revised June 11, 1997, and recorded in 'dap Volume at rage , of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Said strip of land being a portion of the land and premises conveyed to Jim Dean Couillard and Jerry Lee Couillard by warranty Deed of John A. Couillard dated June 20, 1997, and of record in Volume 411 at ?age 19 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, maintain, replace, tatrol, level, fill, drain and pave said roadway, sidewalk and recreational pathway, including the right to install, maintain, repair and replace all necessary fridges, culverts, cuts, curbs and ramps, at its sole cost, expe::se and risk. By its recording cf t:.s Easement Deed, Grantee agrees, for itself and its succesec:a and assigns, that ary ,premises of Grantors lying o-stside the scope of the easement and right-of-way disturbed cr a£+ected 'y Grantee's exercise of the sights granted it hereunder shall be res.ored to their condition prior to such entry at Grantee's own cost and within a reasonable tine, and acknowledges that it will indemnify and hold the Grantors harmless, to the full. limits of liability insurance. that Grantee customarily maintiaina, for any injury or damage resulting from the public use of said right-of-way not attributable to acts of the Grantors. Grantee, by the recording of this Easement Dead, acknowledges that this easement has been donated to the City of South Burlingtcn, at no cost to the City, with the intent that Grantors shall receive the full benefit and protection of 19 V.B.A. Section 2309. For purposes of cans ruction, a temporary easement and right-ot- way extending five (:) feet south of the entire length of said permanent easement and right-of-way is hereby granted. Said temporary easement and right-of-way shall expire once construction is completed and the sidewalk/recreational pathway is open to the public. Grantors, their successors and assigns, shall have no right to enter upon, cross over or make use of the surface of so much of their property as is encumbered hereby, except insofar as the general public may Make use thereof consistent with the intended purposes of said easement and right-of-way. chittenden Trust Company joins in the execution of this deed for the sole purpoaa of subordinating the lien of a certain Mortgage granted to it by Jim Dean Couillard and Jerry Lee Couillard dated July 2, 1997, and of record at Volume 411, Page 21 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, to the permanent easement and right-of-way described above and for no otter purpose, and said mortgage and the lien thereof is otherwise to be and to remain in full force and effect in accordance with the terms thereof, vernont Gas Systems, Inc. joins in the execution of this deed for the sole purpose of subordinating an easement acquired by Deed of Basement fpr Culvert Pipelines dared July 22, 1986 and recorded in volume 216, Pages 24-2s of the City of South Burlington Lend Records, to the temporary and permanent easements granted herein. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plan and deeds and the records thereof, and the references therein made all in further aid of this description. To RAVS AND TO HOLD the above granted rights and privileges in, upon and over said premises ,into Grantes, its successors and assigns forever; and Grantors do fcr themselves and their successors and 2 assigns, covenant wath Grantee and its successors and assigns, that Grantors are lawfully seized in fee simple of the aforesaid premises, that they are free from all encumbrances, that the Grantors have good right and title to sell and convey the same as aforesaid and that Grantors, and their successora and assigns shall .,'arrant and Defend the same to Grantee and its successors and assigns forever against the lawful claims and demands of all persons. IN WITNESS loalEREOF, JI14 DEAN COUILLARD and JERRY LEE CCUILLARD hereunto set their hands and seals this day of August, 1997. IN PRESENCE OF: Witness Witness STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS, Jam Dean Cou lla►rd Jerry Lee Couillard At Vermont, this day of August, 1997, personally appeare m Dean Couillaxd, and he acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed. Before me, Notary Public My Commission expires: STATE OF VZRMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At , Vermont, this day of August, 1997, personally appeared Jerry Lee Ccuillard, aFT he acknowledged this instrument by him, sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and. deed. Before me, Notary Public Ify Commission expires: 3 4 '3,Y a0V4n7-7z-1 : La =3 = ; L6 , 6^ .,)^ VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS, INC. Witness By: Duly Aut.ox zed Agent STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At 1997, personally appeart Vermont, this _ day of August, Duly Authorized Agent of VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS, INC., an a s,e ackZawledged this instrument b him/her sealed and s%:$Cribed, to be his/her free act and deed and the tree act and deed of VERIMON'T OAS SYSTEMS, INC. CRITTENDEN TRUST COMPANY By: Duly Aut rize3 Agent STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CRITTENDEI;, SS. At on the day of August, 1997, personally appeared duly authorized anent of CIiITTENDEN TRUST CG'?fA.'3Y, an ..e she acknowledged this instrument b her/him, sealed and subsc;,ibed, to be his/heir free act and deed, an the free act and deed of C'rIITTENDEN TRUST COMPANY. Before me, 4 Notary Pu c My Commission Expires: STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURUNGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 PATTI R. PAGE* E-MAIL(FIRM2555 WAOLCOM) ROBERT E. FLETCHER JOSEPH S. McLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE ("ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y) October 14, 1997 VIA FACSIMILE AND 1ST CLASS MAIL Lewis K. Sussman, Esq. Pierson, Wadhams, Quinn & Yates 253 S. Union Street Burlington, VT 05401-4513 Re: Wright & Morrissey/Vermont Gas Development Dear Lewie: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA Thank you for the revised draft Easement Deed for the above - referenced project. I offer only the following minor comments. a) Page 2, second full paragraph - Please change "Grantors" to "Grantor". b) Page 2, fourth full paragraph - Please make the following changes to the second sentence in subsection (i): "Grantor, for himself and his successors and assigns hereby covenants that he will not erect or permit any building, landscaping, or any other improvements upon said easement area which, in the judgment of Grantee, and its successors and assigns, might materially interfere with the proper use, maintenance and repair ...." Please end the last sentence of this paragraph after and within a reasonable time." c) Page 2, fifth full paragraph - Please note that the mortgage is recorded at Volume 412. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or wish to discuss this project. Sincerely, Timothy M. Eustace THE/maf cc: Ray Belair SONS428 =R TO: FROM: DATE: RE: PIERSON WADHAMS QUINN & YATES Law Offices 253 South Union Street Burlington, VT OS401 Phone: 802-863-2888 Fax: 802-863-2863 FACSIMILE COVER SHEET Timothy Eustace, Esq. Fax # 660-2552 Lewis K. Sussman, Esq. Fax # 863-2863 October 24, 1997 Bost -it' Fax Note 7671 (To 7 PhOft9 i rnv�w r Fax M G '`G,.i 7 Fax a p4n.Morrissey - Offer of Dedication; Notice of Conditions - PUD Approval NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET —.Zr The information contained in this communication is confidential, may br_ attorney -Client or attorney work -product privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. Unauthorized use, disclosure, or copying is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately at (802) 863-2888. COMMENTS: Tim: After numerous false starts, counsel to the three involved mortgagees, the St. Amands, Vermont Gas, and Dan Morrissey will be getting together Monday afternoon to close the Morrissey/St. Amand land swap. Dan Morrissey is out of town until Tuesday afternoon and not wishing to risk further delay of the closing, he has granted me limited powers of attorney. I talked to Ray Belair this morning, and he asked that I fax to you copies of the proposed legal documents, executed originals of which the city needs prior to issuing to Dan Morrissey a building permit. I transmit for your information, benefit and comment the following copies: executed Limited Power of Attorney; executed Limited Power of Attorney solely for the Offer of Dedication; Irrevocable Offer of Dedication with Exhibit A; and, Notice of Conditions of Planned Unit Development Approval. v,�:FF'OM Pie r'»ir 6 748 F.l2- Upon completion of the closing, I intend to have Vermont Gas execute the Notice of Conditions, and then I will trek out to the City of South Burlington Planning Office and execute the documents on behalf of Dan via the Limited Powers of Attorney. Call with any questions or concerns. C- CC: Mr. Daniel B. Morrissey Mr. Ray Belair TI iTul C� t7i7 STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURUNIGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICETDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 PATTI R. PAGE* E-MAMJIRM2555 r OL.COM) ROBERT E.FLETCHER JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE ('ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) September 30, 1997 VIA FACSIMILE AND FIRST CLASS MAIL Lewis K. Sussman, Esq. Pierson, Wadhams, Quinn & Yates 253 South Union Street Burlington, VT 05401-4531 RE: Wright & Morrissey/Vermont Gas P.U.D. Dear Lewie: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA Thank you for the draft Notice of Conditions for the above - referenced project. Sorry about the delay in responding, but I needed to speak with the Planning Office regarding a question I had concerning this project. After reviewing the document, I have only the following minor comments: 1) According to the Planning Office, Lot #59 is the mini storage lot and is not part of the P.U.D. Please remove that lot number from the first "Whereas" paragraph, or clarify with me why it should be included as part of Parcel A. 2) Please make the following change to the last sentence of Paragraph 5: "It shall be the duty of the owners or the association..." 3) Please make the following change to Paragraph 6: "Any action to enforce any City ordinance or regulation, including zoning or subdivision regulations, against the property, or activities or events occurring on the property, shall be..." Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions or wish to discuss this project. Sincerely, Timothy M. Eustace cc: Ray Belair SON3409.COR State of Vermont SUBDIVISION PERMIT Case Number: EC-4-2085 Pin Number: EJ97-0281 Landowner: Daniel Morrissey and Address: 60 Farrell Street Burlington, VT 05401 LAWS/REGULATIONS INVOLVED Environmental Protection Rules Effective August 8, 1996 Albert Y Marie A. St. Amand 61 South Willard Street South Burlington, VT 05403 This project, consisting of combining four pre-existing lots into two lots identified as the Albert and Marie St. Amand Lot with the dimensions of 410.88 feet (along the Jenning and Handy property line) by 149.66 feet by 262.11 feet by 100.02 feet by 150.02 feet and the Daniel Morrissey Lot being 2.24 acres and having the dimensions of 150.2 feet by 100.02 feet by 262.1 l feet by 200.00 feet by 412.32 feet located off Swift Street in the South Burlington , Vermont is hereby approved under the requirements of the regulations named above, subject to the following conditions. GENERAL The project shall be completed as shown on the plans 97150 Sheet 1 "Property of Daniel Morrissey and Vermont Gas dated June 1997 prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. and which have been stamped "approved" by the Wastewater Management Division. The project shall not deviate from the approved plans without prior written approval from the Wastewater Management Division. 2. Each prospective purchaser of each lot shall be shown a copy of the approved plot plan and this Subdivision Permit prior to conveyance of the lot. The conditions of this permit shall run with the land and will be binding upon and enforceable against the permittee and all assigns and successors in interest. The permittee shall be responsible for the recording of this permit and the "Notice of Permit Recording" in the city of South Burlington Land Records within 30 days of issuance of this permit and prior to the conveyance of any lot subject to the jurisdiction of this permit. 4. This permit for the Daniel Morrissey Lot is issued in conjunction with Water Supply & Wastewater Disposal Permit 4WW-4-1100. All conditions set forth in Permit #WW-4-1100 shall remain in effect except as modified or amended herein. Subdivision Permit EC-4-2085 Page 2 This project has been reviewed and is approved with the existing "Mini Storage Units" on the Albert and Marie St. Amand lot. No other buildings are allowed without prior review and approval by the Agency, and such approval will not be granted unless the proposal conforms to the applicable laws and regulations. No alterations to the buildings that would require the installation of an exterior water supply or sewage disposal system, or change the approved use of the buildings shall be allowed without prior review and approval from the Agency of Natural Resources. Dated at Essex Junction, Vermont on September 8, 1997. Canute E. Dalmasse, Commissioner Department of Environmental Conservation By Ernest P. Christianson Regional Engineer For the Record South Burlington Planning Commission & Select Board Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. Water Supply Division LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. Box 485, 95 Falls Road Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Phone: 802-985-2323 Date: September 11, 1997 Project: 69 Swift Street Project #97150 Fax: 802-985-2271 E-mail: civengass@aol.com To: Ray Belair City of South Burlington (Hand Delivered) From: Stephen A. Vock, P.E. Description: 3 Sets of Full -Size Copies (3 Survey Plats) 1 Original Recordable Mylar Message: As I mentioned during my last meeting with you, the large retaining wall shown on the site plan will be changed to two smaller walls for a terraced appearance. Also, the building footprint has been changed to meet interior requirements, therefore, the building size in the east -west direction will be 5 feet less and 4 feet more in the north -south direction. All impacts (building size, coverage) remain unchanged. Copies to: AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES ,^NR) AND ENVIRONMENTAL P^4RD (ACT 250) rr OJECT REVIEW SHEET THIS I.S NOT A PERMIT :)TAL = DEC PERMITS ESrCNSE DATE PENDING APPLICATION �- (4 - as STR:CT T OWN pL- Rc �, j 0`� PIN #"j 0'�i` I DWNER OF PROJECT SITE: ODOR E SS:(.c:, F*,r,-c, _ck • APPLICANT GR_, - NAME.Q\bg rk d Y1C1 ti l± M t2c�rQ ADDRESS: Lc>1 SC). •��;\�(yr� S�- J&_,.e 1 ass it,, LT y 0 TELEPHONE:__1�3 wed on informaWn_provided by(2 ASSc>✓.,c,,�eceived on a project was reviewed on a tract/tracts !and c° ,/• acres, located on e '} The project is generally described as: ,b,� �-t Pre -Qx; s+ ►Rs d-s ��� 1 marts - �_ov a n;ss lob �1 fro ��e &mec-e�.� �ti., lc� r�c� ..�r.�� -� S�:�•� S-T. Nr"PnoS \a*- Lj: =cr P =- mr m From This Orice: PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAI L OFFICE PRIOR TO COM1,1E?:CE1MENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACT 250: THIS IS A JUPJSDICTIONAL OPINION B;, ED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR T ERES T ED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTC01: E :'.'.AY APPEAL TO THE ENVIRO„ :1ENTAL BOARD (ACT 250) WITHIN 30 �,YS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V.S.A. SEC. 6007(C)). z;mme cial, residential or municipal project? Has t`�e landowner subdivided before? 'J ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED:_ 00, IMEN T S: Length of newfimprcved rcad s)_ `.'rher�w�;�;a=c; low - YES NC: Copies senr tto Statu-Lory Paes: YES NO ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION DISTRICTS #4, 6 & 9 111 WEST STREET 2NATURE DATE ADDRESS (IF ' £SSD(�UNCT�ON VT 05452 DistTict Coordinator Te?ephc e ? 1 P 7 c c r WAS MANAGEMENT DMSION REGJP&,UFF9CE: PEFZMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRED YES NO �GVater Supply & Wastewater Disposal Subdivision 8-/or Exemption Deferral of Subdivision _ Tent/Travel Trader Campground Mobile Hcme Park Server Extension GIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED: ,��„ /3 i? s (�.,J /4,w col ol �1a t-�S 7 DI:FL ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION NATURE: DATE: Z ADDRESS: 111 WEST STREET Environmental ce Division ESSEX JUNCTION, VT 05452 R wastewater Management Division Telephone: 2 )g -g _5-!, 5-& S IS A PRELIMINARY, NON -BINDING DETERMINATION REGARDING OTHER PERMITS WHICH YOU MAY ED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENTS IICATED. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DMSION, ANR (802-241-3822) Contact _ Discharge Permit; pretreatment permits, industrial, munic. a1 Stornwater permits (state and federal) — Indirect discharge permit Residuals management studge disposal 'OLLUTION CONTROL DMSION, ANR (I �41-3840) Contact: nstruction/modification of source Waste oil burning ,pen Burning mace Boiler ConversiorOnstallation Industrial Process Air Emissions Diesel Engines (> 200 bHP) _R SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-2413400) nderground injection control (Floor Drains) onstruction Permit, water system improvements _R QUALITY DIVISION, ANR ydroeiectric Projects (241-3770) .horeland encroachment (241-3777) letlands (241-3770) tream Alteration (748-8787/786-5906) Contact: Well head protection areas Permit to operate Bottled Water New Source Contact: Use of chemicals in State waters(241-3777) Aquatic nuisance control (241-3777) Section 401 Water Quality Certificate; (241-3770) Water Withdrawal (241-3770) -E MANAGEMENT DMSION, ANR Contact: azardous waste treatment, storage, disposal facility certificate (241-3888) azardous waste handler notification requirement (241-3888) ned landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities, drop off(241-3444) .isposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444) JT1ES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR (802-2413737) Contact: am operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.)(241-3451) ate funded municipal water/sewer extensions/upgrades (241-3737) Underground Storage Tanks (241-388s) Asbestos Disposal (241-3444) Composting Facilities (241-3444) HW transporter certificate (241-3888) . .UT10N PREVENTION HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) ARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE, ANR (802-2413700) Contact: :ongame & Natural Heritage program (Threatened & Endangered Species) tream Obstruction Approval ARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY (802-828-2106) or District Office# Boilers and pressure vessels ;onstruction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, access LP Gas Storage torage of flammable liquids, explosives lumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers ARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439.8550 in VT) (802-863-7221) (Lab 800-660-9997) Contact: pod, lodging, bakeries, food processors Program for asbestos control & lead certification oodren's camps Hot Tub Installation & Inspection - Commercial :NCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Contact: Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept. of Aging & Disabilities) :hild care facilities (241-2158) Therapeutic Community Residence (241-2345) ;ursing Homes (241-2345) :NCY OF TRANSPORTATION ccess to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2653) Contact: Junkyards (828-2049) igns (Travel Information Council) (828-2651) Railroad crossings (828-2760) Airports and landing strips (828-2833) evelopmentwithin 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) .onstruction within state highway right -of way (Utilities, Signs, etc.) (828-2653) ARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE se/sale of (828-2431) Contact: -- Slaughter houses, pouttry-processing (828-2426) pesticides silk processing facilities (828-2433) Animal shefters/kennels/livestock dealers (828-2421) Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-2438)°-_ :off courses (828-2431) Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Pouftry/Oleo/Class "C" Pesticides (828-2436) ;reen HouseslNurseries (828-2431) ;LIC SERVICE BOARD (802-828-2358) Hydro projects Sells water to 1 or more persons SION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-8283226) Historic buildings Archeological sites ARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) Liquor licenses General Info (1-800-642-3134) RETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2366) Business registration Professional Boards (1-800 439-8683) ARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551) Business taxes (sales, meals & rooms, amusement machines) ARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2074) Fuel taxes; commercial vehicle Franchise tax/solid waste YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) ERAL PERMS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BLDG 10-18, CAMP JOHNSON, COLCHESTER, VT 05446 (655-0334) IT RICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT iER: 3197 iN DATE: City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 21, 1997 Dan Morrissey Wright & Morrissey P.O. Box 421 Burlington, Vermont 05401 ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Re: Sewer Allocation Transfer, 60 Farrell Street to 69 Swift Street Dear Mr. Morrissey: Enclosed is a copy of the July 15, 1997 Planning Commission meeting minutes and the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project. If you have an�uestions, please give me a call. Si cerel 1 be Weith, (City Planner JW/mcp 2 Encls City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 August 21, 1997 Dan Morrissey Wright & Morrissey P.O. Box 421 Burlington, Vermont 05401 Re: Office Building & PUD, 57,69 and 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Morrissey: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the July 15, 1997 Planning Commission meeting minutes and the Findings of Fact and Decision (effective August 14, 1997) on the above referenced project. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat plans be recorded within 90 days (11/12/97) or this approval is null and void. If you have any questions, please give me a call. ingerelvt,` J* Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 2 Encls cc: Steve Vock / rwLNGY Or NATURAL RESOURCES ;!,; R) AND ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD (AC 11bU) k"cs -7`2T`-9 PROJECT REVIEW SHEET (?, THIS IS NOT A PERMIT TCT;__ : DEC PERMITS --'-- RCS=`:)LASE DATE 17/ PENDING APPLICATION # CiSTF :CT OWN �nr,7H �lia�/1(I('�Of PW # 0 APPLICANT NAME:10k,C4�7" z 1YMDMISSey f AAOL ^: ADDRESS:66 Flq'&£Z(- 9T S017E uQ I — SD. kuk(IxiC70tj Vir Ds' o TELEPHONE: Bases on information provided by dzuj received /F-7 cf !and of 9 acres, located on --`,42 z_L S� on a proiect was reviewed on a tracttracts The proiect is generally described as: £' Y%16e r4 k1.t7A&27'ia,f) e-c 39 V,2Y S•F cutc, r�EA/F.e.,4L DFF£ /U ) lA4T 69 S&J1F7' sr. OF /W9 � k.F.514,6-KJ 14L Avjt4i,(1q'.5 W/7b74r_ DF g A6440tK< J 4 Aua64-,ox) -r NrFzoeeE4 F�'eM "t,jA,L.,.!4ky uj kv &ria.*'[J1x4 wrTb4 ? i4AJr/:ezLtj-r L3r1' /4QJuS-r1kJ /bVUU4sA[6S W1711 "S-7 A.Q.k AaUA "—r" Prti, F� niu From This Office: PERMITS NEEDED FROM THE DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICE PRIOR TO COPS" VIENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION I. ACT 250: THIS IS A JUR-ISDICTIONAL OPINION EASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION. ANY NOTIFIED PARTY OR INTERESTED PERSON AFFECTED BY THE OUTCC .',E Y_- Y APPEAL TO THE ENVIRON':'ENTAL BOARD (ACT 250) WITHIN 30 D,;YS OF THE ISSUANCE OF THIS OPINION (10 V.S.A- S`C. 5007(C)). C:,mmer(:zal, residential or municipal preiect? Has tie landowner subdivided before? A,4 ACT 250 PERMIT IS REQUIRED _ C'O1MME7N T S: Length of newlmproved roads) Vi-1er` c-re.= lots YES _X Copies sent to Statutory Panes:_ YES NO ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISS10 JL.DISTRICTS #4, 6 & 9 III NEST STREET AT=- t< ADDRESS IF DIFFE _N ` ( "District Coordinator Telephone ca _ �' ESSEX JUNCTION, VT 05452 2- WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION REGIONAL OFFICE: PERMITIAPPROVAL REQUIRED v YES NO yWater Supply & Wastewater Disposal v Subdivision aJor Exemption Deferral of Subdivision Tent/Travel Trailer Campground Mobile Hcme Park Sewer Extension REGIONAL ENGINEER ASSIGNED: (i, AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES SIGNATURE: DM OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DATE: � q - 7 ADDRESS: 111 WEST STREET — Environmental nce Division . ESSEX JUNCTION, VT 05452 Wastewater Management Division Telephone: El ? 2 I q ; 9 _$ (0 5- THIS IS A PRELIMINARY, NON -BINDING DETERMINATION REGARDING OTHER PERMITS WHICH YOU MAY NEED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. PLEASE CONTACT THE DEPARTMENTS NDICATED. 0 WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR (302-241-3822) Contact: �! 'j ",Ay�� Discharge Permit; pretreatment permits: industrial, municpJ L--"Stormwater permit (state and federal) Indirect discharge permit Residuals management sludge disposal 15 OTHER PERMITS YOU MAY NEED: (Continued) 4. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION, )NR (802-241-3840) Contact: Construction modification of source Waste oil buming Open Buming Fumace Boiler Conversion/Installation Industrial Process Air Emissions Diesel Engines (> 200*bHP) Si WATER SUPPLY DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3400) Contact: t Underground injection control (Floor Drains) Well head prote &ion areas Bottled Water Construction Permit, water system improvements Permit to operate New Source 6. WATER QUALITY DIVISION, ANR Contact: Hydroelectric Projects (241-3770) Use of chemicals in State waters(241-3777) Shoreland encroachment (241-3777) Aquatic nuisance control (241-3777) Wetlands (241-3770) Section 401 Water Quality Certificate; (241-3770) Stream Alteration (748-8787/786-5906) Water Withdrawal (241-3770) 7 WASTE MANAGEMENT DIVISION, ANR Contact: u.o - Hazardous waste treatment, storage, disposal facility certificate (241-3888) Underground Storage Tanks (241-3888) Hazardous waste handler notification requirement (241-3888) Asbestos Disposal (241-3444) Lined landfills; transfer stations, recycling facilities, drop off (241-3444) Composting Facilities (241-3444) c- Disposal of inert waste, untreated wood & stumps (241-3444) HW transporter certificate (241-3888) S. FACILITIES ENGINEERING DIVISION, ANR (802-241-3737) Contact: Dam operations (greater than 500,000 cu. ft.)(241-3451) State funded mu,iic;pal'vrater,'Ge war G'x<ci �`.,10iiS+/lipgra.'�P i (241-37 37 ) 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION HOTLINE (1-800-974-9559) RECYCLING HOTLINE (1-800-932-7100) 10. DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE, ANR (802-241-3700) Contact: Nongame & Natural Heritage program (Threatened & Endangered Species) Stream Obstruction Approval 11 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY (802-828-2106) or District Office# u • l Bk d f8-d i9 S rr Construction Permit fire prevention, electrical, plumbing, access Boil and pressure vessels Storage of flammable liquids, explosives LP Gas Storage Plumbing in residences served by public water/sewer with 10 or more customers 12. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (800-439-8550 in VT) (802-863-7221) (Lab 800 060-9997) Contact: Food, lodging, bakeries, food processors Program for asbestos cont o' &lead certification Children's camps Hot Tub Installation & Inspection - Commercial 13. AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES Contact: Child care facilities (241-2158) Residential care homes (241-2345) (Dept. of Aging &Disabilities) Nursing Homes (241-2345) Therapeutic Community Residence (241-2345) 14. AGENCY OF TRANSPORTATION Contact: _ Access to state highways (residential, commercial) (828-2653) _ Signs (Travel Information Council) (828-2651) _ Development within 500' of a limited access highway (828-2653) _ Constructcn wthin state highway right -of way (Utilises, Signs, etc.) (828-2653) 15. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Use/sale of pesticides (828-2431) Milk processing facilities (828-2433) Goff courses (828-2431) Green Houses/Nurseries (828-2431) Junkyards (828-2049) Railroad crossings (826-2760) Airports and landing strips (828-2833) Contact: Slaughter houses, poultry processing (828-2426) Animal shefters/kenneWivestock dealers (828-2421) Weights and measures, Gas Pumps, Scales (828-243&)-- Retail Sales/Milk/Meat/Pouftry/Oleo/Class " C•• Pesticides (828-2435) 16. PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD (802-828-2358) Hydro projects Sells water to 1 or more persons 17. DIVISION FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION (802-828-3226) Historic buildings Archeological sites 18. DEPARTMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL (1-800-832-2339) Liquor licenses General Info (1-800-642-3134) 19. SECRETARY OF STATE (1-802-828-2366) Business registration Professional Boards (1-800-439-8683) 20. DEPARTMENT OF TAXES (802-828-2551) Business taxes (sales, meals & rooms, amusement machines) 21. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (802-828-2074) Fuel taxes; commercial vehicle Franchise tax/solid waste 21—L.00AL PERMITS (SEE YOUR TOWN CLERK, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR, PLANNING COMMISSION, OR PUBLIC WORKS) 23. FEDERAL PERMITS U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, BLDG 10-18, CAMP JOHNSON, COLCHESTER, VT 05446 (655-0334) 24. Ai.iERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT 25. OTHER: 3/97 iEVISION DATE: STITZEL, PAGE & FLETCHER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) STEVENF. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 PATTI R. PAGE* E-MAII,(FIRM2555@AOL.COM) ROBERT E.FLETCHER JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE (*ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) August 1, 1997 Joe Weith, City Planner City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Sidewalk/Bike Path Easement for 79 Swift Street Dear Joe: OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA Enclosed please find a draft Easement Deed for a combination sidewalk/bike path along the frontage of the property located at 79 Swift Street. Please give me a call to discuss this document after you have had a chance to review it. Thank you. Sincer , Timothy M. Eustace THE/dah Enclosure SON3355.COR DRAFT EASEMENT DEED KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that JIM DEAN COUILLARD, of East Calais, County of Washington, and State of Vermont, and JERRY LEE COUILLARD, of Milton, County of Chittenden, and State of Vermont, Grantors, in consideration of One Dollar, and other valuable consideration, the receipt and satisfaction of which are hereby acknowledged, to be paid to them by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, a municipality located in Chittenden County, State of Vermont, Grantee, hereby GIVES, GRANTS, SELLS, CONVEYS and CONFIRMS unto the said Grantee, CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON, and its successors and assigns forever, a perpetual easement and right-of-way for all purposes, including but not limited to, construction and maintenance of a street, construction and maintenance of a sidewalk or sidewalks, and construction and maintenance of a recreational pathway/bike lane, all of the foregoing improvements to be dedicated and devoted to use by the general public, over, on and through property of the Grantor located in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, and more particularly described as follows: A strip of land eight and one -quarter (8.25) feet in width located along the entire length of the northerly sideline of Grantors' property, known and numbered as 79 Swift Street, said strip of land having a sideline of one hundred twenty five (125) feet, more or less, along the southerly edge of the right-of-way of Swift Street, as the same is depicted on a plan entitled "Swift Street P.U.D., 57, 69 & 85 Swift Street Overall Site Plan, South Burlington, Vermont, Sheet 1," prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., dated April, 1997, last revised June 11, 1997, and recorded in Map Volume at Page of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Said strip of land being a portion of the land and premises conveyed to Jim Dean Couillard and Jerry Lee Couillard by Warranty Deed of John R. Couillard dated June 20, 1997, and of record in Volume 411 at Page 19 of the City of South Burlington Land Records. Grantee, its successors and assigns, shall have the right to construct, reconstruct, repair, maintain, replace, patrol, level, fill, drain and pave said roadway, sidewalk and recreational pathway, including the right to install, maintain, repair and replace all necessary bridges, culverts, cuts, curbs and ramps, at its sole cost, expense and risk. By its recording of this Easement Deed, Grantee agrees, for itself and its successors and assigns, that any premises of Grantors lying outside the scope of the easement and right-of-way disturbed or affected by Grantee's exercise of the rights granted it hereunder shall be restored to their condition prior to such entry at Grantee's own cost and within a reasonable time, and acknowledges that it will indemnify and hold the Grantors harmless, to the full limits of liability insurance that Grantee customarily maintains, for any injury or damage resulting from the public use of said right-of-way not attributable to acts of the Grantors. Grantee, by the recording of this Easement Deed, acknowledges that this easement has been donated to the City of South Burlington, at no cost to the City, with the intent that Grantors shall receive the full benefit and protection of 19 V.S.A. Section 2309. For purposes of construction, a temporary easement and right-of- way extending five (5) feet south of the entire length of said permanent easement and right-of-way is hereby granted. Said temporary easement and right-of-way shall expire once construction is completed and the sidewalk/recreational pathway is open to the public. Grantors, their successors and assigns, shall have no right to enter upon, cross over or make use of the surface of so much of their property as is encumbered hereby, except insofar as the general public may make use thereof consistent with the intended purposes of said easement and right-of-way. Chittenden Trust Company joins in the execution of this deed for the sole purpose of subordinating the lien of a certain Mortgage granted to it by Jim Dean Couillard and Jerry Lee Couillard dated July 2, 1997, and of record at Volume 411, Page 21 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, to the permanent easement and right-of-way described above and for no other purpose, and said mortgage and the lien thereof is otherwise to be and to remain in full force and effect in accordance with the terms thereof. Vermont Gas Systems, Inc. joins in the execution of this deed for the sole purpose of subordinating an easement acquired by Deed of Easement for Culvert Pipelines dated July 22, 1986 and recorded in Volume 216, Pages 24-25 of the City of South Burlington Land Records, to the temporary and permanent easements granted herein. Reference is hereby made to the above -mentioned plan and deeds and the records thereof, and the references therein made all in further aid of this description. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above granted rights and privileges in, upon and over said premises unto Grantee, its successors and assigns forever; and Grantors do for themselves and their successors and assigns, covenant with Grantee and its successors and assigns, that Grantors are lawfully seized in fee simple of the aforesaid premises, that they are free from all encumbrances, that the Grantors have good right and title to sell and convey the same as aforesaid and that Grantors, and their successors and assigns shall Warrant and Defend the same to Grantee and its successors and assigns forever against the lawful claims and demands of all persons. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, JIM DEAN COUILLARD and JERRY LEE COUILLARD hereunto set their hands and seals this day of August, 1997. IN PRESENCE OF: Witness Jim Dean Couillard Witness STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. Jerry Lee Couillard At , Vermont, this day of August, 1997, personally appeared Jim Dean Couillard, and he acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed. Before me, Notary Public My Commission expires: STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At , Vermont, this day of August, 1997, personally appeared Jerry Lee Couillard, and he acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed. Before me, Notary Public My Commission expires: 3 VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS, INC. By: Witness Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At , Vermont, this day of August, 1997, personally appeared , Duly Authorized Agent of VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS, INC., and he/she acknowledged this instrument by him/her sealed and subscribed, to be his/her free act and deed and the free act and deed of VERMONT GAS SYSTEMS, INC. CHITTENDEN TRUST COMPANY By: Duly Authorized Agent STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At on the day of August, 1997, personally appeared , duly authorized agent of CHITTENDEN TRUST COMPANY, and he/she acknowledged this instrument by her/him, sealed and subscribed, to be his/her free act and deed, and the free act and deed of CHITTENDEN TRUST COMPANY. Before me, SON108.REA 4 Notary Public My Commission Expires: City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 18, 1997 Stephen A. Vock Civil Engineering Associates, Inc. P.O. Box 485 Shelburne, Vermont 05482 Re: Sewer Allocation, 69 Swift Street Dear Mr. Vock: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Please be advised that the South Burlington Planning Commission at their meeting held on July 15, 1997 granted a total sewer allocation of 2040 gpd (840 gpd of additional allocation and 1200 gpd for existing homes to be removed) for a 38,428 square foot office building owned by Wright & Morrissey at 69 Swift Street. This property is served by the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility which has sufficient capacity to handle this additional demand. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, a'� LZ ioe Weith,/�4 City Planner Jw/mcp PLANNING COMMISSION 13 MAY 1997 page 3 be 18 ft. in width. Mr. Weith recommended that the structure that is to be removed be taken down prior to the transfer of land. The applicants agreed to do this. No other issues were raised. 6. Public Hearing: Preliminary plat application of Wright & Morrissey, Inc, for a planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a new 41,125 sq. ft. building for general office use, and a bank with drive -through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street: Mr. Webster noted that Vermont Gas had an option on this property because they needed more space. After they got their permits, the felt they couldn't use that much space and looked for partners to share it with. They couldn't find any, so they let the option go and rented space at 99 Swift St. Then Mr. Morrissey bought the property. A stock broker has asked Mr. Morrissey to build a building similar to the one done at 60 Farrell Street. North Country Credit Union also wants a drive -through facility, so a PUD would be required. It is therefore proposed to put all the property together as a PUD. Vermont Gas was also concerned with "being stuck" in a neighborhood that may not be progressing. So Mr. Morrissey got some additional space, reduced the footprint of the building and made it higher (4 stories) and turned it 90 degrees. There would also be contiguous parking. Members discussed whether this is truly a PUD. Staff was uncom- fortable with the proposed access and wanted it to consume less of the Conservation Zone. Vermont Gas agreed to this. The question of the road location was then discussed. Members asked for a bond and a time limit on the building of the road. If it is not built in that time, the bond would be used to build the road as shown. The applicant was comfortable with the 3-year time limit recommended by Staff. The Fire Chief has asked for the walk to be extended to the east as well as to the west so that fire trucks can be set up there. This will be done. The building will be fully sprinklered, and new fire hydrants will be added as recommended by the Fire Chief. The plan is 15 spaces short on parking, 8.3%. Mr. Webster said that the higher a building goes, the less efficiency there is in PLANNING COMMISSION 13 May 1997 page 4 the building and the less parking that is not the city's standard, clined to accept the deficiency. required. Mr. Burgess said and said he would not be in - Mr. Weith noted that the site plan for Vermont Gas is not accurate as there has been encroachment of the parking area near the back fence. He asked that the information be updated to show what is actually there. Mr. Webster then addressed building height. He showed the existing grade. They will drop the grade from 202' to 199.6' so the floor of the building will be at 200' and the roof at 2481. The average pre-existing grade is 197'. He said the main issue in this is views. The building has been pulled back to increase the setback and give view corridor space. There is also an issue as to whether this is compatible with the character of the neighborhood. Mr. Webster said the area is now commercial and is a bit "junky." They want to clean it up. He added that the proposed building would be one floor above the existing house. Members expressed no problems with the building height. Mr. Vock said that issues regarding lighting have been resolved. Mr. Weith said he still needs details for the Vermont Gas property. Regarding wetlands issues, Mr. Webster said they will research what needs to be done. Mr. Morrissey advised that Mr. Couillard has agreed to meet with the City Manager regarding the sidewalk/rec path issue. His concern is liability, and if that can be resolved, he will go ahead with it; otherwise, the rec path may be moved a bit into the street. Mr Weith said they want a 5' rec path beside the sidewalk. The City will do the sidewalk all the way to Shelburne Road. Mr. Webster said they will do what is required. Regarding traffic, Mr. Dinklage asked if the applicant would con- tribute to a traffic light for the future even though it is not now warranted. Mr. Weith said no since it is not one of the projects enumerated in the city's Impact Fee Ordinance. Ms. Carriere said the original traffic report will be revised with the assistance of Regional Planning in order to take into consideration the drive -up access to the bank. They anticipate 146 trip ends in the peak hour instead of 125. 77% of traffic is predicted to access from Shelburne Rd and the rest from Swift PLANNING COMMISSION 13 May 1997 page 5 or Farrell. Figures represent a 5-year projection. Mr. Crow asked why there are no figures for the Swift/Spear intersection. Ms. Carriere said it was not required by the City Planner. Ms. Carriere added that it is proposed to do the grading so that snowbanks don't block sight distances. Mr. O'Rourke asked why it is being said that intersections can go to Level of Service "E". Ms. Carriere said it is a new policy because there are so many "E" level intersections. The by-pass lane for the drive -through bank was then discussed. Mr. Webster said they will show striping at final plat. The parking space blocked by the stacking lane will be for employee parking. Mr. Morrissey noted there is impact on one parking space from the 6th car in the stacking line. Mr. Webster then showed a second landscaping option. Mr. Weith recommended something bigger than the junipers shown along the eastern property line. Mr. Morrissey agreed to do that. Mr. Webster noted there would be a chain link fence and a wood fence along the St. Amand property line and there would be landscaping along the fence line. Mr. Crow asked for confirmation that the two lots will always be linked as PUD even though they can be sold separately. The applicant confirmed that he understood this is the case. Mr. Burgess noted there is no sewer capacity available. The applicant is asking that his allocatiion from another approval be changed to this application. The policy established by the city does not allow this. If it is to be allowed, it would have to go through a warned item on an agenda so the policy can be amended. Until this is done, the application will show no sewer allowance. Mr. Weith said other applicants currently on the waiting list would have to be notified as well. Mr. Burgess explained that the Commission's concern is with people "hoarding" sewer capacity. Members said they were not pursuaded by the applicant's case for so large a parking waiver. They felt the applicant could reduce the footprint of the building to meet the requirement. After some discussion, the Commission agreed to split the difference and have the applicant get the building size down to where there is only a 4% parking waiver. The applicant agreed to do this. Mr. Crow moved the _Planninq_Commission _approve the_preliminaLl plat�applicationof�Wri_7 t�&�Mo_rrissel., Inc, fora planned unit PLANNING COMMISSION 13 May 1997 page 6 development�consisting�of�the existing Vermont_ Gasn _buildinand a new 41,000 sq. �ft. _building�for _general �office use_and a bank with �drive �through �service, 69 and _85_Swift _Street, as�deoicted on�a 10,page set �of_clans,_page two entitled "Swift Street_ P.U.D. 57169 & 85 Swift Street Overall Site Plan," prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc odated _April, 1997,_last revised 5/8 97, with _the �following stipulations: 1._ All �previous �approvals _and `stisulations which �are _not_super- seded_by_this�aeeroval shall remain in effect._ 2. Prior to issuance _of_a_zoninnpermit �for �the �office �buildin_q, all appropriate_legal �documents _(e.g.y irrevocable offer of ded- ication and _warrantsdeedtfor �the _street �widening) shall �be� sub- mitted _to_the City Attorney for approval and �recorded _in_the South �Burlington �Land Records. 3. The applicant �shall _construct �a_10_foot wide sidewalk recreation path _along �that portion _of�the �project's frontage which �does �not currently have a sidewalk recreation paths This sidewalk/recreationypath� shall be continuous across the Couil_la_r_d_ croperty with the_apgropriate legal documents orconstructed within the existing Swift Street r.o.w. This sidewalk/recreation pathshallbetconstructed _prior tto�occu ancyrofthe �office build- ino and to the specifications approved bythe �Public Works Direc- tor. Prior to start of construction of the sidewalk recreation path, the applicant shall �post a�bond �which covers �the costof the sidewalk/recreation path. 4. Theclans_shall be_ revised crior�to�final_plat �submittal as follows: a)_ Theplan _shall �be revised to show_ the future_ internal access drive connecting with the southwesterly corner of the parkingvlottat_85_Swift Street �instead ,of�the north- westerlv_corner. b._The_plans�shall�be�revised to show detailed design of the future internal access drive_(e., rading,rslope, drainage,_etc.). Also ,theslans�shall be revised to show_ the larking spaaces'-removed in those �locations _where _the internal_ access_ drive_connects_to parking lots. c)_The _plan _shall be revised to note the �type�of screening proposed�for �the �new �dumpstero d. The overall site plan shall �be�revised to show the _side- walk �along ,the �front of the _proposed _office building, as, shown onsheet 1A. ����� PLANNING COMMISSION 13 May 1997 page 7 e_)_T_he__olans_shall_be_ revised _to show_the_proposed _10_foot wide combination _sidewalk/recreation _ path along _the _entire frontage of the project, includinq_the_area _in_front _of the _Couillard_broperty._ f . The_olan_shall_be_revised to reduce_ the _square _footage th of�e_new office_ building _sn_that_nomor e than_a_4o parking_waiver_is_reguired. 5. The_proposed_internal _future _access drive _shall _be_constructed within_ three_ years from the date of final approval._prjQr_o t issuance_of_a —zoning _permit, -a-bond to cover the cost of the future access �drive _shall be posted and shallremainin effect until �said �future access drive is constructed.����� 6. Pursuant to Section 26.256(b) of the zoning_ regulations, -the Planning_ Commission_aroves a4$_parking _waiver _for _the Proposed office building. It is the Commission's opinion that fewer spaces thanrreguiredcwill adequately_ serve_ the project since -a significant portion of the gross square footage of the building, will be devoted which typically_do not _generate _parking demand_ .�._._.�._._.��._._.,_.._ 7. Prior_ to_issuance _of -a zoning permit, the applicant_shall_post a�$28,500�landscape bond. The bond shall_ remain_ in effect_ for three years_torassure _that _the _ landscaping_ takes_ root_ and has a food chance _of_survivincL, 8. All new exterior lighting shall consist of_downcasting shielded fixtures _so_as not to cast lighttbeyond the _pro perty line. Any_change_in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to_installation.- Datails -of -any building moun_t_e_d_ lights_shall be approved by the City Planner _prior__to_permit issuance.Details of lightindon_#85_Swift _Street shall be submitted_priorito -f inal_ylat 9. For the Purpose _of_calculating_road_impact_fees _under _the South Burlington_ Imo act_ Fee -Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the pro oosed office building will generate additional vehicle trip ends during_the_P_M__peak_hour. The estimated _number tofrvte's will be determined_ at final plat 10. Pursuant to Section _25.113(c)_of the zoning regulations, the Planninq_Commission aPprovess a-16_foot height waiver for the croposed_ office _buildingThe _Commission _has _determined that this taller structure: (1) will not _affect _adversely_the_essential_ character_ of the neighborhood_ or_ district _in_which _the_property_is_located. PLANNING COMMISSION 13 MAY 1997 page 8 (ii) will not detract from the _important �scenic �views from _ad'acent_public _roadways_and _other oublic_riohts-of- of_way 11. The Planning Commission orants_a�sewer_allocation of 850_cpd for the new office/bank building_ At this time, the orocect_will be placedonthe waitln list �for �sewer �caPacity The determination on whether unused sewer caoacity_at 60�Farrell Street may be transferred to this tproject, �and �therefore �allow this �prodect_to bycass�the _waiting list, �will _be_made _at�final plat. 12. Prior to final plat submittal, �the asPlicantyshall investigate whether there are any wetlands along thestream crossing 85 Swift Street. If wetlands are found, they shall be shown ron_the _final �tlat_ plans. '�� 13. The applicant�shall _record �in the land records a "Notice Condition" which clearly indicates _that tthis rodecttconstit a �PUD andthat �for �z oninwand�planninc purooses�the entire brooertwillbere arded�as�a single _parcel �of�land. This document shall _reouire abroval of the City Attorney and sha recorded prior_ to recording the final plat plans. 14. The final slat application shallbesubmitted within�12 months. -- - .� Mr. Dinklaoe seconded the motion which �was �then passed�unan- imousl� of tes 11 be 7. Sketch plan application of John Larkin to construct a 6-story, 91 room, addition to an existing hotel with 89 rooms and a 225 seat restaurant, 1 Dorset Street: Mr. Rabideau gave the City Planner a revised plan addressing many of the issues that had been raised. Mr. Rabideau identified the parcel as Howard Johnson's on Dorset Street/Williston Road. He said they are trying to upgrade the property as it is seen as the gateway to the city. Mr. Rabideau indicated they had been through a number of possible designs before settling on the new 6-story structure. He added that they do not have total latitude on the Friendly's part of the parcel. The setback along the highway ramp and along Dorset St. have been changed. There will be no parking allowed in the setback areas. Nine feet has been added on either side of the setback to accommodate the additional height. CAM INED DATA PARC&S A d: 9 1E4 A Area. Density and Dimensional RoWirementir propose: AUawoble �Mypooep R.D.W k,,j�=,. Minimum Lot Stm 40.000 s.t. 7a673 s.t. Total Acreage: 4 Amm(PUD7 6.51 Acres BSA k +-.- Number of Lotr -- 2 2 Minimum Lot Fronta" 350 feat 685 tart 985 .. Maximum Ek Ading Coverage: 30.0% 9.4% 9.6x Maximum Front Yard Coverage: 30.0% 35.6%b> 27.9X Mmdmum knpervfaus Arse 70.0% 6t.5%%0 $1.5% Type of Land Use: Commsrci: OtRcs 9uRcUng includes sidewalk fmprcvsnents requested by the City of Sout� 0 includes 4uture roadway and access Improvements at 85 Swif, =11=9111 IEGM EX01M cae,ouR —ass— mpoBm mwmw Pf10POt1Y UIE o ww PNR ----Ss aRAWIY EMP LINE ---,t YWTM UE - -- [ 0490WAD MMIM — — s OAS LINE ® Rapt NA*KU NnoRA r • WkTm 9NT-017 VALVE ovascAD acolmc P= ■ •• CATCH DAM LOW vans =W •O®e — mm or wkw/ii .. O— OOSTM FENM 1E7WD YJ�L .�NM AtW wi AEM�1A A 11VA ALL ki� EASEMENTS t90R— TltE TFr, Ymlm aGEwxx AM A(SFATN ALIXM itE CaIA.LA/D PF1@'E711Y NAVE Half Sam OWAIM ALK dy= i a 1 �RMMRom, " Omani Mile• � '%/ GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN Per :mL - 4^ a r. SITE IUCAnO P.,,.,ECEIVED JUL 0 9 1991 City of So. Burlington t t FE& L -A7-9777 F' Nt � QSYIr /b1r \ .Sint _ SNIFT STREET P.U.D.. A1 1 w,—ma PRoi-mo runm noADwAT 57, 89 & 85 SWIFT STREET or nY COWENT& —1 swv I ACCD vTAsaACvr MVERALL97E PLu A Data I Ch k'd Revhkn laws err � Drawn by � Dots AoPoL. 1997 SHEET Cheaked by Scais I' x 40, CM 911011EERl9 A390QAIM W. Approved by SAY Project No. 97150 SHE-9URNE. VERMONT COMBIMM DATA. PPRGr! CC A & 9 f84 d: Area, Density and Dimensional Requirements Proper Allowable Proposed Minimum Lot Size: 40.000 e..f. ZU570 s.t. 277,n31 4.t. Or##i Totai Acreage: 4 Aar*PUD) 6.51 Acree 6.38 A< -es Murnber of Lott —_ 2 2 Minimum Lot Fronteae: 350 feet 885 feet 685 rses lit I , 1 Maximum Building Coverage. 30.0% 9.4%35.6 9.8% Maximum Front Yard Coverage:. 30.0X 35.6XG- w S � ►M � � � ` 1 � YV,IJ '� it I I !# � / � i 27.9% Maximum imperviaua Aran; .. ,� '�: r 70.0% 8S.5Xa) 61.5X ..: { Tyre of Land Ues: Comm ;a pffl» BuBdlny 1i m Includes sidawaik Improvements requested by the City of South 8urihngto n. JUL Q 7.1997 1 m Includes future roadway and access Improvements at 85 Swift Street.4- i LOOMW SCALE: 1 - Zaps pity of So. Burlington I ILO77 ,�- 1 / AWWAXW a~ l ALL MHSa.SWX MUMENTS FOR TIRFIFU MSIX-WA"AM '/ wnn r1VM49MM �� AKSHAlZ'ATi�S iT Y PnOPEMIA to yneenex� 1 PROPCOMOEM" �— F/YOl1MrwFFF..... { � «� /}, ,f _ f1 a �, 1 � _ � ./ ,—fM71+0eE.tt+erar. 1 .,.- 7 _ / y � --�-- ti rnmF M uc O Y M PM - — —ss COMA. MOMENT onAOTtY SEWR UW __. _ W WATTA LOX -- — E w.m- aVEKW-M ELMINOC — — o ows UK ® WFORM MANHOLE KH WA]Weefr • WAIF» SHUT --OW VALVE; 'a E WRNE40 Fi£CWJC PQF ® CAMM SAS! .s a Wf par M COMM M'VWV'VW\ m*K OF enuw/aaax 1 --O O— FENCE b 41= GRAPHIC SCALE �FES. CT , I PARCEL. B t I i 7 -mill I I Awl LJ SW" SIMET P.t1A - :RL' r�-k. ,, r•:fr x Tvr, r rscxr: v'e Nr & IM fi'1I, �A 6-a-r/ SAY AWM 11. ROIDWI ARY GVIebEHTS OVE i SM PLM Data ChVd Rewiebn Drawn by -M L Date ..Ae8 2_14 SHEET Cfm*W by JE Scde _:� - ; ' Aiti90iAA7ES. NG 9iELBURW- VERMONT MProvad by�14= Proj.oi ta,..-_.�Zt.�'��_---- ■■ am ■■ u n ■ ■ ■ ■0 ECURNME ■■ ==- =___l■■ = =-■■ MEMNON ■■l� W■■■■■ ■ ■ ■■ EXIST. CB II j I `` �t ��� RIM - - - _ L _ -.- I nunkars �/!C �/ �(� INV IN - 179.89 INV OUT - 179.38 I �^ Ii / �% I� J` 6 1i rie� wd dMr3� n ro eoey orr1 \ oa-09* EXIST. D►9, --�.Y / I ! ' / - RIM - 182.66 INV W - 179.95 f /( INV OUT - 179.83 -- ---ter I -P° I - , \x —0 JUL vg', 4/1 RECEIVED � 194 � � I �11 1 / r' � /i j//%�� ',..�....,..;: ..�rll/j � /,,'�/ � d►Iw! aid NWA City of So. Burlington i r' : AoDF B_EV U BOOM •FCREIYARD 7NROW 76•x28" /�// /////�/� /%//// �� / / // / SQUARE ALUMINIUM FIXTURE w/ 400w MH I IAMP, DARK BRONZE FINISH i/ SQUARE ALUMINIUM FIXTURE ,�' /i% w/ 25Ow MH LAMP, DARK EXIST. SMN /.: f;i / . _-`._ /, / ( •SPAULDING SE11-400M-FT BRONZE FINISH RIM - 197.27 I `� I / / arFr / I w/ PHOTOELECTRIC CONTROL AND CUTOFF SHIELD (OR INV. B"-192.77 - •SPAULDING SE1-25oM-FT INV. 8"-193.77 V /> APPROVED EQUAL) INV. 8" -i 93.77 E9 \ , / i/ !/ / ; 1 ' AND CUTOFF / PHOTOELECTRIC CONTROL APPROVED EQUAL) (OR INV. 8"FM -10.77ANCHOR BOLTS & TEMPLATE BY LIGHT NON -TAPERED SQUARE � POLE SUPPLIER ALUMINIUM POLE DARK BRONZE FINISH I� 1 w r• � I BOLT OR CADWELD HAND HOLE w/COVER , O I,I A&Wt OOW � J� TO�POLE WIRE Ma7i storage units St MAW { PAVEMENT 1 r; FINISH GRADE 3•-L SURFACE _ I VO Cl/B CUT ICE EX CUISM LJf8JD 0�L 3J4" CONDUIT FOR SCH BO PVC FTNNA o I J#6 U� COPPER POLE TO POLE w/ 3/4 --_ — _- __-. -_ __ I I ND WIRE y SEPARATE GROUND I I ; r — — — — — — — — — — I i (a) /s VERTICAL 1 WIRE 3/4" x 10' COPPER I r I GALVANIZED STEEL TO WELD '� �I • $roa ' 1 ND mkw Storage units I i'1 I BOND TO CONDUIT, PVC CONDUIT CONNECTORILL BASE WO ROD#3 TIES O 12` O.C. 1N► � 1 �- ----- — - -- _j I POLE LJGHT DETAIL SAC A r mend I ,y �E)O�STCB- RIM - 200.0 - ` - t A 11 PLANTING SCHEDULE SYMBOL COMMON NAME SO)ENVIC NAME SUE/CAUPER NUMBER COMD. am aoG.m NAP Re A%R SACC11Am+N 4 - 4 1/Y CAL 14 B ! B WEI QUIP w ana+ BETIAA PAPwKLRA a - 10' W 14 B ! B WE OWArM WENG [{RMYYVa E11OrA1RE05 ALA V. QUWACM b - 42' lIKJ1 31 1 B ! B Ij SEA WAIN RIIeER AREPERiIs C-IMS 'SEA GREEN' 24 - 301 Mal 48 B ! B BC secuN CRAB YAWS BACCATA 3 1/2 - 4' CAL 14 B ! B WP t/ETE ME v.A s Smoak 8 - 10' 4DH 19 B ! B PO PH 0_ wows PA1A51A15 - 4 ,/2" au- 9 8 ! B VB VANI m S>wRE.A SPIRU VANbII TIEI 24 - 30' — 14 B ! B 13. St]IaAaCM IRAC SYA,4f nAGARr' i[NSAIIRP 3 -- 4' ww 26 B ! 9 LL lfTi1E IEAF ,➢RrtN+ ltlA CC.DATA - - ♦ 1/2' CAL 4_ 11 B ! B AC ANFAICAN cR.vreERR',9uS1 wauRrA.0 mslw4N cweACllAI - 30' HIGH 38 B ! B Y� SWIFT S7REIET P.U.D. p „ >-.-.r SAV 3AV REw3D PROPOSED FUTURE ROADWkY REVISED AS PER MMAMMY OMMENTS PROPOSED BLXMG A a-•r SAV ADDED SIDE,EAK FENCE �/��P� LANDSCAPEy L� P� p A SAV R£A9ED CODING, RET. WILL9OEWMX f� IA�V ♦ 0a . ••N�TP` Dab Ch•k'd RRw/ElOa Drown by �MJW Dot. APRIL 1997 SHEET Chocked by JP sow I" - 20' W& MNMI +c ANIMAIM NM n T Approved by SAY ProJ.ot No. 97150 Citv of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 July 11, 1997 Dan Morrissey Wright & Morrissey PO Box 421 Burlington, VT. 05402 RE: Office Building & PUD, 57, 69 & 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Morrissey: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, July 15, 1997 at 7:30 p.m. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. in erel�y�% e �Weith, ity Planner M E M O R A N D U M TO: South Burlington Planning Commission FROM: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer RE: July 15, 1997 Agenda Items DATE: July 11, 1997 POMERLEAU PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - MAGIC HAT _BREWERY - BARTLETT The sewer main along the west side of the property should be in a 15 foot easement to the City. There is no record of this ever being done. It should be done with this record plan. SWIFT STREET PUD - MORRISSEY DEVELOPMENT Site plan dated April, 1997 prepared by Civil Engineering Associates is acceptable. ST. AMAND/MORRISSEY BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT - 59 SWIFT STREET Plat prepared by Krebs & Lansing dated 4/11/97 is acceptable. ST. AMAND SITE PLAN - 59 SWIFT STREET Site plan prepared by Civil Engineering Associates dated 6/11/97 is acceptable. VON TURKOVICH - STRATMANN- SWIFT STREET 1. City Plan for sewering this area is to extend the gravity line westerly along Swift Street. The two first lots should be sewered by gravity. The back lots may require pumping. 2. Plan should have contours as planning regulations call for. 3. The proposed access drive should line up opposite the access drive across Swift Street. 4. The location of water services should be shown. 5. All lots should have their sizes. 6. Access road should have a turnaround. M E M O R A N D U M To: Joe Weith, South Burlington City Planner From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: Plans Reviewed for July 15, 1997 agenda Date: July 2, 1997 1. ST. AMAND Site Plan Dated 6/13/97 59 Swift Street Proposed paved drive should be at least 20 feet in width. 2. ST. AMAND/MORRISSEY BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT Dated 6/13/97 59 Swift Street Acceptable 3. MORRISSEY SWIFT STREET PUD Dated 6/13/97 57,69 & 85 Swift Street Sidewalk along front of proposed office building should be extended as previously agreed. 4. FRANK VON TURKOVICH Dated 6/25/97 300 Swift Street Acceptable 5. MAGIC HAT Dated 6/27/97 5 Bartlett Bay Road Acceptable ITT� CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P. O. Box 485 (802) 985-2323 SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 Fax No. (802) 985-2271 CHARLES R. DUNHAM President April 29, 1997 Mr. Daniel Morrissey Wright & Morrissey 60 Farrell Street - Suite 401 So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Proposed Swift Street Office Building Sewer Flow Requirements Dear Dan: STEPHEN A. VOCK Vice President JEAN -CAROL DUNHAM Treasurer As you have requested, I have summarized below the design sewer requirements for your proposed office building to be located off Swift Street in South Burlington. I have also included a summary of sewer flows for the 60 Farrell Street project (National Gardening) which indicates that there is a significant amount of unused capacity. Proposed office building design sewer flows: Building Size = 41,000 SF Calculated Employment: 41,000 SF/(250 SF/Person) _ Design Sewer Requirements: 170 Employees x 15 Gallons/Person Credit for Low Flow Fixtures (20%) TOTAL REQUIREMENT Capacity presently allocated to this property: 164 Employees (use 170 employees) 2,550 gpd - 510 gpd 2,040 gpd One 3-Bedroom House + One 5-Bedroom House = 8 Bedrooms Design Flow = (8 Bedrooms x 150 Gallons/Day) = 1,200 gpd At this time it appears that you need an additional 840 gallons per day of sewer capacity to meet your design flow requirements. Unused capacity at 60 Farrell Street: Building A (not built) Sewer Allocation = 750 gpd Building B - An allocation of 3,850 gpd was granted for a combined medical office building/general office building. This allocation request was not reduced when the medical office component was eliminated. Design Flows Allocated to Project = 3,850 gpd STUDIES a DESIGN • INSPECTION • TESTING SURVEYING & LAND DEVELOPMENT HYDRAULICS & HYDROLOGY SANITARY & WATER FOUNDATIONS & STRUCTURES CONCRETE & SOIL TESTING Mr. Daniel Morrissey Page 2 April 29, 1997 Design Employment: 41,000 SF/250 SF/Person = 164 Employees + 6.7% Growth = 175 Employees General Office Building Design Flows (175 Employees x 15 gpd) - 10% = 2,362 gpd Infiltration: 415' of 6" Diameter Pipe = 150 gpd Deli with 3 Employees = 195 gpd Unused Capacity = 1,143 gpd In summary, the design sewer flows for your proposed office building can be met by using the sewer flows presently allocated to this property combined with the unused capacity of your 60 Farrell Street project. If you should have any questions or need any additional informationza Sincerely, Stephen A.oc,.. SAV:pao 5-01-1997 3:49PM Fr CIVIL ENG_ ASSOC_ 18029852271 P_1 CIVIL ENGINEERING J 0- Box 485 SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 Mr. Daniel Morrissey Wright & Morrissey 60 Farrell Street - Suite 401 So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 ASSOCIATES, INC. May 1, 1997 Re: Available Sewer Capacity for the Proposed Swift Street Project Dear Dan: (802)985-2323 Fax No. (802) 985-2271 CHARLES !_ DUNHAMI h M�iQrnt STEPHEN A. VOCK Vice PreHdent j6AmCAkCtL OVNmAm T'"Wv' I have spoken with Virginia Little and Ernest Christianson (Department of Environmental Conservation) to discuss the possibilities of transferring the unused sewer capacity from the 60 Farrell Street project to the proposed Swift Street project. They both agreed that the transfer of sewer allocation would be acceptable, however, they would need a letter from the City of South Burlington stating that this transfer is acceptable and supported by the City of South Burlington. The 60 Farrell Street Water/Wastewater Disposal Permit will need to be amended to reflect the reduction in allocation to that project. If you should have any questions or wish to discuss this letter in further detail, please let me know. Sincerely, Stephen A. Vock, P.E. SAV:pao STUDIES • DESIGN • INSPECTION ` TESTING MAY- 1-97 TH9 3:53 PM 18029852271 p. 1 CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P. O. Box 485 (802) 985-2323 SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 Fax No. (802) 985-2271 CHARLES R. DUNHAM President STEPHEN A. VOCK Vice President July 2, 1997 1E11-CAROL DUNHAM Treasurer City of South Burlington Mr. Joseph Weith, Town Planner 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Allocation Request for Swift Street Office Building Dear Joe: At this time, we would like to officially request a transfer in sewer allocation from the 60 Farrell Street project to the proposed 69 Swift Street Office Building in accordance with the recently modified City policies. The net increase in design sewer flows to the proposed project is 840 gpd which is the amount we are requesting to transfer. (Please refer to my April 29, 1997 letter summarizing the design sewer flows). If you should have any questions or wish to discuss this letter in further detail, please let me know. SAV/jcd Enclosure `7 S' 9 Dat t Sincerely, Stephen A. Vock i t i - Signature of Landowner - National Gardening Assoc. STUDIES • DESIGN • INSPECTION • TESTING SURVEYING & LAND DEVELOPMENT HYDRAULICS & HYDROLOGY SANITARY & WATER FOUNDATIONS & STRUCTURES CONCRETE & SOIL TESTING Rev. 5/26/93 AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES FOR OFFICE USE ONLY DEF rMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERV; pN Permit #_ PERMI.O, COMPLIANCE & PROTECTION DIVIbION Date Application-- Received Fee Received Check # WATER SUPPLY AND WASTEWATER DISPOSAL (Schedule "C" to Master Act 250 Land Use Permit Application) THERE IS TO BE NO SITE WORK OR CONSTRUCTION COMMENCED ON THIS PROJECT WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES. LANDOWNER: CO -APPLICANT: Name: National Gardening Association Name: Wright & Morrissey, Inc. (As shown on Deed for Property) Daniel B. Morrissey, President Hailing 180 Flynn Avenue Mailing 60 Farrell Street - Suite 401 Address: Address: 05401 Burlington, VT So. Burlington, VT 05403 Tele. No.: 863-1308 Tele. No.: 863-4541 Business Name (if other than above): CONSULTANT: (architect, engineer, site technician) Name: Civil Fngineering Associates, Inc. Tele. No. 985-2323 Stephen A. Vock, P.E. Address: p_ (1_ Rnx 485 Shelburne VT 05482 (mailing) (Street) (Town) (State) (Zip) A. PROJECT LOCATION: (Attach Map) Town: So. Burlington Road/Highway: Farrell Street B. When was the parcel created? August 1974 Size of Parcel: 4.9 Acres C. List any prior Environmental or Act 250 permits issued for A above: WW-4-0875-1 (-2) D. Describe the project (be specific: see item #1 o-n back (Attach 2 sets of plans) Reduce the allowable total employment from 266 to 2�0 in the General Office Building._ Sewer flows to be transf erred to t e Swift Street Office Building. E. TYPE OF WATER SOURCE: (Municipal, offsite, community, onsite) Municipal (Attach approval - see #6 on back) F. Does this water supply serve 2 or more buildings? Yes G. TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: (municipal, off site, community, onsite) Municipal _ (if municipal, attach approval - see #5 on back) H. Number of gallons of sewage generated: Existing Flows: 4,600 _ Proposed Flows: -840 Total Flows: 3,760 I. APPLICATION FEE: ($0.36 per gallon of design flow of project - minimum fee of $100.00 per application.) Make check payable to STATE OF VERMONT. (Municipalities Exempt) ENCLOSID S 100.00 7 � _ a't,20- _ ATE SIGNATURE OF LANDOWNER DATE -------- SIGNATURE OF CO -APPLICANT ` ------ PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on July 15, 1997 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Final plat application of Wright & Morrissey/Vermont Gas for a planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a new 39,728 square foot building for general office use and a bank with drive -through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street. 2) Final plat application of Dan Morrissey and Marie and Albert St. Amand for a boundary line adjustment involvinq 7,500 square feet of land, 57 and 59 Swift Street. 3) Revised final plat application of Eldo's Cafe, Wright and Morrissey, and National Gardening to amend a planned unit development consisting of a 41,000 square foot general office building and an 11,400 square foot general office building, 60 Farrell Street. The amendment consists of converting 500 square feet of general office space to bakery and delicatessen use. 4) Preliminary plat application of Francis J. VonTurkovich, Patricia A. Stratman for subdivision of a 9.8 acre parcel into three (3) lots of approximately 1.9 acres, 2.1 acres, and 5.8 acres, 300 Swift Street. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission June 28, 1997 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on July 15, 1997 at 7:30 P.M. to consider the following: 1) Final plat application of Wright & Morrissey/Vermont Gas for a planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a new 39,728 square foot building for general office use and a bank with drive -through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street. 2) Final plat application of Dan Morrissey and Marie and Albert St. Amand for a boundary line adjustment involvirVq 7,500 square feet of land, 57 and 59 Swift Street. 3) Revised final plat application of Eldo's Cafe, Wright and Morrissey, and National Gardening to amend a planned unit development consisting of a 41,000 square foot general office building and an 11,400 square foot general office building, 60 Farrell Street. The amendment consists of converting 500 square feet of general office space to bakery and delicatessen use. 4) Preliminary plat application of Francis J. VonTurkovich, Patricia A. Stratman for subdivision of a 9.8 acre parcel into three (3) lots of approximately 1.9 acres, 2.1 acres, and 5.8 acres, 300 Swift Street. Copies of the applications are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission June 28, 1997 71 JA�T) Lv Tc,�/C- - N ( 7,4r--!�5 .. ............ ill V-Pzt 5, �l o <) lo( = -L FORM NR-1 units s.f. COMPUTATION OF TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL IMPACT FEES PROJECT DATA: (1) "EFFECTIVE DATE" FOR TAX CREDITS: (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS (3) ESTIMATED PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (From current tax assessment) (4) TOTAL FLOOR AREA AFTER CONSTRUCTION (5) (6) TYPE OF USE 1 % f.0� /3O% / vph TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION � I-e-f 514 �, 4,-fe+ IMPACT FEES: (7) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (From Form NR-2) FORM xR-2 COMPUTATION OF ROAD IMPACT FEES (1) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE RATE PER PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP END (2) ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP ENDS (From form NR-1) $ 226.00 / vte vte (3) BASE ROAD IMPACT FEE 4 (1) x (2) $ (4) PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 // f ( from line ( 3 ) of Form NR-1) units (5) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND (From Table ST-9) $ ( / unit (6) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND p (4) x (5) $ �. _107 (7) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-10) $ / unit (8) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND (4) x (7) $ - (9) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND (From Table ST-11) $ / unit (10) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND (4) x (9) $ (11) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF PRE -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION ��22 0.5 V (From Table ST-12) $ / unit (12) CREDIT FOR PAST TAX PAYMENTS (4) x (11) $ (13) POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 ( From line ( 8 ) on Form NR-3 ) �,���. °p units (14) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST- CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1991 BOND (From Table ST-13) unit FORM NR-2 (continued) (15) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1991 BOND (13) X (14) (16) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1998 BOND (From Table ST-14) $ / unit (17) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1998 BOND $ (13) x (16) (18) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST - CONSTRUCTION VALUE - 1999 BOND (From Table ST-15) $ v.�Y� / unit (19) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS - 1999 BOND (13) x (18) $ (20) CREDIT PER $1,000 OF POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE - ANNUAL TAX ALLOCATION (From Table ST-16) $ / unit (21) CREDIT FOR FUTURE TAX PAYMENTS (13) x (20) $ v✓6 (22) TOTAL ROAD IMPACT FEE (3) - (6) - (8) - (10) - (12) (15) - (17) - (19) - (21) FORM NR-3 ESTIMATION OF POST CONSTRUCTION VALUE (1) TYPE OF USE (From line (5) on form NR-1) (2) TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION (from line (6) on Form NR-1 (3) TOTAL FLOOR AREA (From line (4) on Form NR-1) (4) ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT VALUE PER SQUARE FOOT (From Table ST-17) (5) ESTIMATED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS (3) x (4) (6) LAND VALUE (From current tax records) (7) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE (5) + (6) (8) ESTIMATED POST -CONSTRUCTION VALUE IN UNITS OF $1,000 (7) / $1,000 s.f. ���� units Preliminary Comments - Planning May 13, 1997 agenda items April 24, 1997 Page 2 requirements. Applicant should inform staff under which provision they wish to have this project reviewed. the location of the proposed porte cochere may interfere with the existing access. this is a major redevelopment of the site which requires numerous waivers from the City's standards. Staff will only support this application if there are substantial improvements done to improve the appearance of this property. At a minimum a substantial landscaped green belt should be provided in front of Friendly's along the frontages of the I-89 ramp, Williston Road and Dorset Street. ALBERT & MARIE ST. AMAND & DAN MORRISSEY - BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT - SKETCH PLAN --- sketch plan should include type of, location, and size of existing utilities. --- the sketch plan should indicate that the southerly property line is the boundary between the Cl District to the north and the R4 District to the south. --- the boundary line will pass through an existing structure and not meet the 15 foot setback requirement from another structure. This structure must be removed prior to conveyance of the parcel to St. Amand. --- show reserved strip for future street widening or show easement for sidewalk. --- provide existing and proposed front yard and overall coverage information. WRIGHT & MORRISSEY - OFFICE BUILDING - & PUD - PRELIMINARY PLAT --- this project does not appear to meet the purpose of a P.U.D. The design and layout is not innovative or provide for shared parking opportunities or coordinated access, etc. --- for the bank use, provide gross floor area for bank use, provide square footage of floor area devoted to general banking services for public use, and provide square footage of floor space devoted to office use. --- provide gross floor area devoted to general office use in the building. --- provide perimeter survey stamped by a surveyor for the entire PUD. 2 PUD. Preliminary Comments - Planning May 13, 1997 agenda items April 24, 1997 Page 3 -� sheet 2 indicates that there are two ( 2 ) dif ferent pole lights f proposed. Plan should note which light is which. --- show reserved strip for sidewalk and future street widening. -- - Overall plan should show the C.O. District along the stream crossing 85 Swift Street. --- all existing site conditions at 85 Swift Street should be shown on the overall site plan (i.e., parking spaces, landscaping, exterior lighting, etc.). --- submit report addressing the PUD criteria under Section 26.151 of the zoning regulations. the preliminary plat application must be signed by VT Gas. - the applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is f approximatey $22,000. --- provide coverage information for the property which would exist after the future street widening. --- indicate height of retaining wall ELDO'S CAFE - OFFICE TO BAKERY/DELI - SKETCH PLAN --- applicant should address sewer allocation for the property and how it is affected by the proposed use. --- a bakery/deli is a conditional use in the C2 District. Approval from the ZBA is required. --- the applicant should be aware that the road impact fee for the proposed change in use is $0. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON/JOHN LARKIN - BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT SKETCH PLAN --- plan should show the location of the C.O. District (50 feet from centerline of stream). --- plan should show the zoning boundary between the Park & Recreation District and the C2 District. --- the plan should clearly note the boundary line to be dissolved. --- the plan notes that there is a proposed 250 seat ballroom. This is existing not proposed. --- a plan should be submitted which shows the Larkin property and all of the City of South Burlington property on the same sheet. This does not have to be a survey. 3 s ,tom i•.��. r ��AJ��'�%.•O��/ .tom. � SAY REVISED PART GRADING d DRAMAOE 7MAVREVISED DMeTE-THRU,REVISED PROPOSED FUTURE ROADWY REVISED AS PER PRE1 MRY COMMENTS a ADM SIDE1lAU(. FENCE REVISED GRAMMQG RET. MKl SVEWAIX CRvVklon -CMMM DATA. PARCELS A & 9 159 & ON Area, Density and Dimensional Rewirements: P-P.- Alkweable Prop— r!--O-w- Mlinlimm Let Size: 40.000 &f. 283.575 &r 27/.8,1 Total Acreage: 4 Acree(PLID) 6.51 Acres 6_$6 Number of Leta -- 2 2 ifinIrrvurn Lot Frontogw 350 feet am fee, 895 Maximum BuIlAng Coverage: 30,OX 9.4% Maximum Front Yard Caveraqw. 30.OX 35.6X01 Maximum knpwvkxm Arm 70.10X 8t.51E* et.5t lype, of Land Use: CommarWal offlos Bullidling (D includes 3!dewdk Improvements requested by the City of Sou t. includes future roadway and access improvements of P3.5 Swi " AJEM -- - E49111,10 Ca"Tat" —3Z'*— PR POW M~ — Mporry LIME 0 FIGN PIP _S9— 00"C. MONUMENT QRAWTY SEIM LIRE RkIER L22 atil!AHIDD MECWNC -a— am UWE 49 SEWER MANHOLE STORM M*NxXL H11DA-INT 0 WATER SHUT--W VALW 0%13*WAD IsECIRIC Pat a CATCH BASIN LIGHT Paz 20k Q e la - - 1IDGE OF Nam E10111410 race WEILAND 7 CCIIIIIIINECI, SIDENALKAWFAII4 XJW"ff OF TIE OOULLAAD PARCEL ==raF 61CK IDETAL FRAIwE + 00*111 wrfti LEINW-61 -MAM 00MCAYS roATB RALYACE FRAME NO 0OAn AINK-ACE EPOMM CA7tll HAW ORATE RON RALVACED 140AM: COVER RAKE 9114 TO FIN ORAM SIDENAlix PROPOSED SVIFAVLA AMDBWPATH f-MV= GRAPHIC 'SCAlY, (01 FIRM) i..h - 40 , U)CA7101 MAP SME 1, - ECEIV , JUL 0 9 1997 City of So. Burlington —7 L 7� 7 7 brOOVEMENTS 0 P PARCEL B &.1V Arti)( j 1�t � VI/ t & 4F.41 % An )t\ 77 7 7 E N ICT A.MV LJ Ora POW- a-4=09. I SAV REV MEWMX AT ODIALARD PROMTY SV*T SWET P.U.D. SAV REV= FUTURE ROADWAY 57. 89 & 05 SWFT SYREET OF sew SAV RENSSM AS PER PRELMINARY 00MMUNIS FUTURE ROM MY OVERALL SITE PLAN 0=6 Qjum� \OFRU Drawn by -M L Date APWL 1997 94EET Ora Chadamil by : scale I" - +0, ems.D*00MG ASSMATE& MI Approved by SAY Protest Pro],No� 97150 9k SHELBUFW- YERMONT I CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P. O. Box 485 (802) 985-2323 SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 Fax No. (802) 985-2271 CHARLES R. DUNHAM President STEPHEN A. VOCK Vice President JEAN -CAROL DUNHAM Treasurer July 9, 1997 Mr. Ray Belair City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: St. Amand Proposed Access Swift Street, So. Burlington Dear Ray: As we discussed during our telephone conversation, the existing access width to the storage facility is not shown accurately on the topographic site information. Our actual field measurements are shown below: Measurement at ROW 2193" 15' South of ROW 2095" 30' South of ROW 2094" 45' South of ROW 2097" Average Width 209811 Therefore, we have revised the proposed entrance road to the St. Amand property to show a 20'6" width. If you should have any questions or need any additional information, please let me ow. Sincerely, 0. Stephen A. Vock, P.E. SAV:pao STUDIES • DESIGN • INSPECTION a TESTING SURVEYING & LAND DEVELOPMENT HYDRAULICS & HYDROLOGY SANITARY & WATER FOUNDATIONS & STRUCTURES CONCRETE & SOIL TESTING City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 20, 1997 Dan Morrissey Wright & Morrissey P.O. Box 421 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Office Building & PUD, 57, 69 & 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Morrissey: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are my preliminary comments on the above referenced project. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department will be forwarded when they are available. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Monday, July 7, 1997. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Since ly, Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp 1 Encl M E M O R A N D U M To: Applicants/Projectls From: Raymond J. Belair; 'South Burlington Planning & Zoning Assistant Re: Preliminary Comments, July 15, 1997 Agenda Items Date: June 20, 1997 WRIGHT & MORRISSEY - OFFICE BUILDING & PUD - FINAL PLAT --- the trip generation assessment should be revised to reflect the reduced building size of 39,728 square feet. --- a drawing should be provided showing the sidewalk/recreation path in front of the Couillard property in the event that the necessary easements are not obtained to cross this property as shown on the plan submitted. --- the landscaping plan should be revised to show the same site conditions as shown on the site plan sheet lA (i.e., future access drive, dumpster, etc.). --- plan must note type of screening for proposed dumpster (condition #4c). --- the overall site plan must be revised to show the sidewalk along the front of the proposed office building as shown on sheet lA (condition #4d). --- property lines to be disolved should be clearly indicated as such on the plat. --- lighting details for 85 Swift Street should be submitted. --- the plat should show the reserved strip for future widening. MARIE & ALBERT ST. AMAND - ACCESS MODIFICATION -SITE PLAN --- plan submitted is acceptable. ALBERT & MARIE ST. AMAND & DAN MORRISSEY - BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT - REVISED FINAL PLAT Plans should include the following information: --- type of, location and size of existing water and sewer lines. --- _indicate that the southerly property boundary line is the boundary between the Cl District to the north and R4 District to the south. E 7 W�, V360 6-01 7119 not OD t2- 6V31 -- � ......,. �.. 00, 6M 6v� 40 Round Quadrate Vertical J Series %y �rxpv��5 �ST-J�Vl� A-T- Co 4S /10"677e f1ftV This 20.5" diameter housing has a Vertical Lamp, for 150 and 175W medium base lamps, and 250 and 40OW mogul base lamps. All provide quadrate distribution (IES Type V) (the mogul base system provides the greatest uniformities and optimum pole spacings). The optical chamber is sealed to reduce dirt contamination. The fixture uses a round steel pole with an internal slide -in ballast. Every Round Area light includes the fixture, ballast frame and 5.5" diameter steel pole. A 20' pole height is standard; 15', 25' and 30' poles also available. Housing and pole are standard with our DeltaGuard finish, featuring an E- coat epoxy primer and medium bronze acrylic powder topcoat. Mounting arms for the Post Top Mount come standard with our black DeltaGuard finish. o 20.5" --I Candlepower Distribution Curve of 40OW MH Quadrate Vertical with Post Top Mount. 2.5" d Isofootcandle plot of 40OW MH Quadrate Vertical with Post Top Mount at 25' mounting height. too' 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 100' 80' 80' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' 100' 100' 80' e0' 40' 20' a' 20' 40' so' 80, 1 nn- Isofootcandle plot of 40OW MH Isofootcandle plot of 40OW MH Quadrate Vertical with Post Top Mount Quadrate Vertical with Post Top Mount at 20' mounting height. at 30' mounting height. Specification Sheets: JQV-T JQV-S JQV-W Optical Systems.............................................Page 80 Mountings ................... ...Page 81 ........................... Catalog Number Logic/Voltage Suffix Key ........................ Page 81 Poles..................................................... Page 85 4 ONE CALL DOES IT ALL! Ruud Lighting (800) 236-7000 Area Cutoff Floodlight AC Series O lt?V MBA iss-E'%Z This compact forward -throw reflector has a main beam of 60°+ from vertical (30' from horizontal), providing wide lateral distribution and improved uniformities. A supplied backlight shield permits precise cutoff adjustability. Candlepower distribution curve of 40OW MH 16' Area Cutoff Floodlight. 0 "aft " Isofootcandle plot of 40OW MH Area Cutoff Floodlight at 25' mounting height, 0' tilt above horizontal, with backlight shield removed. RUUD LIGHTING Isofootcandle plot of 175W MH Area Cutoff Floodlight at 15' mounting height, 0' tilt above horizontal, with backlight shield located for backlight cutoff. Isofootcandle plot of 1000W MH Area Cutoff Floodlight at 30' mounting height, 0' tilt above horizontal, with backlight shield removed. Specification Sheets: BULLETIN MAC1-12', BULLETIN MAC2-12', BULLETIN MAC3-12', BULLETIN MAC4-12', BULLETIN MACE-12', BULLETIN MACW-12', BULLETIN AC1-16', BULLETIN AC2-16', BULLETIN AC3-16', BULLETIN AC4-16', BULLETIN ACK-16', BULLETIN ACM-16", BULLETIN ACW-16% BULLETIN ACi-22', BULLETIN AC2-22', BULLETIN AC3-22', BULLETIN AC4-22' 2-LevelOption (250W HPS)................................Pages 52-53 Optical Systems.........................................Pages 58-59 Mountings ................ ............................Page 60 Catalog Number Logic/Voltage Suffix Key ........................ Page 61 Mounting Alternatives........................................Page 72 Accessories ................................................Page 73 Mounting Brackets.......................................Pages 74-75 Poles.................................................. Pages 76-77 This Ruud lighting product features our DeltaGuard finish! Call for details at: (800) 236-7000 o� 69 Square HID/Fluorescent (Wall Mount) SE Series ✓"ovn/T-00 �. SE3 Series Perimeter Cutoff The reflector directs light downward to wash the wall below and to the sides of the fixture. The extra wide cutoff distribution provides glare control and permits maximum spacing between fixtures (recommended spacing is 5 times mounting height). 8" Perimeter Cutoff 2000 0 0 2 = 3 m 4 30°1 m, o N 2 0 3 0 4 121, Perimeter Cutoff 175W MH, 15' mounting height 0 1 2 3 4 5 Distance In Units of Mounting Height 0 1 L Distance In Units of Mounting Height Mounting Multipliers Mounting Multipliers Height (ft.) Multiplier Height (ft.) Multiplier 7' 2.04 8' 3.52 8' 1.56 10, 2.25 9' 1.23 12' 1.56 10' 1.00 15' 1.00 12' 0.69 20' 0.56 15' 0.44 25' 0.36 20' 0.25 The 8' SE3 Series photometric data was developed in testing Ruud fixtures with clear, 50W HPS 4,000lumen medium base lamps. Footcandle readings for other wattages and lamp types may be obtained by multiplying the chart values by the following: Lamp/Wattages Multiplier 50W MH 85 70W MH 1.38 35W HPS .56 70W HPS 1.63 The 12" SE3 Series photometric data was developed in testing Ruud fixtures with clear, 175W MH 14,000 lumen medium base lamps. Footcandle readings for other wattages and lamp types may be obtained by multiplying the chart values by the following: Lamp/Wattages Multiplier 26W Fluor. .13 10OW MH .64 100W HPS .68 150W HPS 1.14 Specification Sheets: BULLETIN SE3-8" BULLETIN SE3-12' Catalog Number Logic/Voltage Suffix Key ......................... Page 5 Accessories ................................................Page 33 EVERY HID AND FLUORESCENT FIXTURE includes the lamp at No Extra Charge! Call (800) 236-7000 Fax (800) 236-7500. Cutoff Floodlight CF Series 1 1 le-1 60 11 20, Or 20' A— VT: Clors IOAO_oa� Ty 11 FLw-- S, MAtlro "�_ y��A This cutoff luminaire has an optical system specifically designed to assure maximum main beam projection, wh i le minimizing spill light. It is generally positioned with a 15' to 25° tilt above horizontal to reduce glare and obtain optimum performance. Candlepower Distribution Curve of 40OW HPS Cutoff Floodlight, 20' tilt above horizontal. 9 80' 60' 40' 20' 0' 20' 40' So' 80 Isofootcandle plot of one 40OW HPS Cutoff Floodlight at 30' mounting height, and 20' tilt above horizontal. r tifa�n eam Adjustable / Backlight Cutoff /sa" r J i Perpendicular to Fxture The main beam is 50` above a line perpendicular to the face of the fixture. RUUD LIGHTING 3 � O O .�« man S' , _ 1 MAI®�, Sk ILUM11FAFAW ; �,��►i■ R WISIX ... .•.... rrr Accessories: (field -installed) (Page 73) 12' housing ;3,&, 16" housing ;Ar&e 22" housing ytuu Wire Guard FWG-12 $10 FWG-16 tJ_9 not available Backlight Shield SBL-12 $4 SBL-16 $`¢ SBL-22 �6 Polycarbonate Vandal Shield LS-12 $12 LS-16 y`J� LS-22 $30 Specification Sheets: BULLETIN MCF3-12', BULLETIN MCF4-12', BULLETIN MCF5-12",BULLETIN MCF6-12', BULLETIN CF3-16'. BULLETIN CF4-16", BULLETIN CF5-16'. BULLETIN CF3-22'. BULLETIN CF4-22" BULLETIN CF5-22' 2-level Option (250 thru 40OW HPS) ........................ Pages 52-53 Optical Systems ......................................... Pages 58-59 Mountings .................................................Page 60 Catalog Number Logic/Voltage Suffix Key ........................ Page 61 Mounting Alternatives........................................Page 72 Accessories ................................................Page 73 Mounting Brackets ....................................... Pages 74-75 Poles..................................................Pages 76-77 THE BEST CUSTOMER SERVICE IN THE INDUSTRY! Order by phone (800) 236-7000 or by fax (800) 236-7500 63 E)GS ce INV INV ' r Af Pf COUUAW MST. DMH �I --- = - '� �`� 1■ ', �. w � �� . 9v` •.......".... , ...."..�.... w ..wwwww.r«wnw.www.w. w w .„.�. ,..,-,...-,.a.. ter._ �..�i/r�if��r _ •.../� r�:i� %" / '� �hC// s ,: w - .. .. � ..•.. :...,...,,,..•„•.-_G �T �:; �J.••,/may �`} I I _����.,��G r�i �61.i'f'o'•,, / • % �� .%�� ����� ���� ,�ii%%iiY/%/, i� � �/ ..M, • .. /�� , �' � ,.,,�. � y!J'`�yi�r. '�fi%�i�ii�,,�m�il%=���`,a� � � i//�i' ,%///i//`.., �///,y,!����/// �3�'�>► �/ kt ll.•�•� `. `�1+ :� , � � � r• � / � �;,,y�,,;; 'Yssrs��i////f%i"I x�•�i;�// f:1l�iE•il't�k'g ram& y tf ., % �� sh%��/i/ii ION CONNECTION �Q��"���ip loss ' tA��'� �'''�//��//�% ��• i ' ��" "''-�•�. ... � ;�H,,, .,,, /��' �'=r/��/� ° //%�� it WIT � � � �i �9 ■ ��, �;� �r, _ � , e • ��,.. �/ o may/ /�ii/,;�,//�i, ,G'/�.�5 / / '. /✓/// •//",�///4,..,�■111,■■0: �1' 11■■limo■■1'■■■■■11��� •..._' !!% / ./ %� /;%% �E!! 'J. •! �':n R. Irmo �j/i �� : ���•; �j�i�,f�yyi%„���s���%�%iii.�%��% Y//%%//%a % %! �i.%�l�'i%���j� �,y %/��� �//rm� rimi • � � l ��T���l ///'raw - —a wrl s W4 — —_- .cam FOE Ot, 11 IN /////%/////% 'lot� M r ■ ■ ■ �m �T® -t� • .I�' i•.{.li .tee. I. ... s 'S M ping at , , Have a job ope your businef Just ,' call 658-3321 ad- ! + vertise in the Free + l+a little Japanese/lcelandic comedy about I Last week's Top Fivevideorentals: Press Classified sec- 1;� pie Masatosl- ^' `1V. �guile - Gouncu o conBrtw, aP- the �IVISIOn Tor' a Japanese yuPP ( a���- Jev+e PERSONALS b SOUTH BURLINGTON household item-, proval of a tax stabliza t h e B l i n d of -Mystery Train") who tra mist. tion agreement between ZONING NOTICE A happily marred the City of South Burling- Im- the harsh, freezing Icelandic RLIIIGTON Huge ADOPT PP y con and EZP Golfco, L p and Visually In accordance with > �r1 to perform a traditional cere :mily Sota, micro- couple can give your paired W I I I South Burlington Zoning •� i collectibles, baby love arK1 security. Res med' a south Bur and Chapter the remote river where his p ,old much more! You can help make us a es Ha er, be holding 117 Title 24, V.S.A. the J Dnces. Fri., Sat 8- Tamil Medical/le al ex- fTl e e t- seven years earlier. On his r ;ty Manager p u b l I C South Burlington Zonin Harbor View Rd. nses paid. call an I g meets up with some bizarre. ,Iburne Rd.. follow I'son and Kurt 1 7 in On WedneS- Board of Adjustment will time. P June 28, 99 9 hoid a public hearing at . and interesting characters. L o 3 Bay Court. 1_800-998-8829 pUBUC HEARING d a y , A U the South Burlington u- ,tip 1585 ADOPT lake- SOUTH BURLINGTON 997 nicipal Offices, Confer- '. and Fisher Stevens are feats JRLINGT$Nn. 9-1. ION Lov 9 PLANNING side. New E and cou- List 6, re fed and co -written by Fr' re artwork, jew- p1e wishing adopt an COMMISSION r o m 1 ; Q Q Street. a Room, 575 Dorset F,idriksson. misc. infant. O r adopted Street, South Burlington.Mday. r daughter ould be a lov- pm, Vermont on Mondayy. BURLINGTON 9 The South Burlington a t0 ' t h e July o consider at 7.00 -The Last Dance" (Hens Ti: _well Ave, Multi- ing sister Financially se Planning Commission i s a ompelling comedy-myst( Baby items, turn'- cure, s y home mom. will hold a public hearing P M. to consider the fd- afts, tools, house- Lots of ve, laughs and at the South Burlington Se n d F I OO f lowing: Swedish filmmaker Colin 1, ,erns, misc. Fri & expene ces to share. City Hall, Conference C O n f e r #1 Appeal of New Eng- Medical legal expenses Room, 575 Dorset (" fouse of Angels") tbcusit ;Sun 10-2. paid P ase call Sandra g ante OOm, OS- land Telephone, Annette - Street, South Burlington. couples who recall their roc it 1(603) 228-1614 M-F Vermont on July 15, O d Anson, agent seeking ^.S ship and jealous obsession % BURLINGTON 8.30 a - 5.00 pm. 1997 at 7:30 P.M. to con- g approvat from Section nborhood Sale" Loving couple sider the following: Bulldl g, State 13.20 Conditional uses, room dance competitions. & Queensbury Rds. ADOPT share their Q f I C e sub section 13.206 Pub- rrw Dfl Patchen Rd.) want tat application _ I;c utllitity Section distn- & Sun 9-4prn. hearts home with new- t) Final p Comp X, W a bution lines of the South G Q �� �� * {7 7 born. Lo of love. hap x- of Wright & Mornssey/ Burlington Zoning Regu- 3URLINGTOH 76 pens & security. Ex- Vermont Gas for a ' lation. Request is for pauses pa .Call Debby planned unit develop- t e ( U f y Ave. in Queen & Larry 1-80 89-2246. ment consisting of the Ve f nt• Pur- permission to construct a ark. gray house be- * A existing Vermont Gas e O f the 11, x 17' structure hous- e O /� / J 7e green, Sat 8-3 CORPOR B building and a new 39g p ing tale -communication G ry n i BURLNNGTON s uare foot building is t0 Molson Center hockey, for ge ,� meeting equipment on a lot con- Q ,ply, 10-4. 75 Hines- to include playoffs. Call and a bank with drive- a t h e ( pub - taming 3,375 square feet osmith $9 9d Crafts, clothes to discuss terms Of through service, 69 and g located at t690 Shel- . ( �n more! lease- Eric at 802-527- 85 Swift Street. IIC COmmentS an turn Road. E Who to $ 9 9. "0LE ► U rrtx 7792. t h e V O- Srt1EC CAII iSL7321, 1 application # 2 Appeal of Kevin Do- NUpIfT Clothing option. 2) Final pat iss p r O - nohue agent for Valcom URUNGTON Family oriented club of Dan Morrissey and C ataii0 n aO f the H seeking approval from . i -family. Cars, Snow seeking membership. Fa-tion, MarieArnanand a Albert St. g U9 • e. 4-Place trailer, camp' -Poo . items, ary clothing & camping. Contact Maple line adjustment involving FREE 'rinx het,, Charter Bus, _ .i! Sat 8-3 & Sun Glen, Box 4438, Enos- 7,500 square feet Swift f nit U's and Juh.c f rom :Ingelina' 982 Hinesburg Rd burg Falls, og ether. & e land. 57 and 59 mail dks@together.net. Street p sURL9 a.m-3 WOODEN SKIDS -Yhont 1_$$$-394-7440 _one 27 & Sat, June WANTED-2 TICKETS 3) Revised final plat ap = om 9 a.m-3 p.m. Loudon, NH race on July plication of Eldo's Cate, / / �� anover Street. 13th. Call 893-7877, Wright and Morrissey, e „ I I BURLINGTOH 72 leave msg. and National Gardening ;wood Dr., Sat 10-4. A T 8 to amend a planned unit aw equip, skiis-Al- development consisting Contact 000• nord;c, boots, wind- ENTERTAINMENT of a 41,0o square foot `yaa jrng equip, bikes, K general office builnBob Peeter8 At xkeling equip, tennis A PLANET ROC and an 11,400 square EXPERIENCE foot general office build - much more, trunks, Dancers 7 days/wk. 127 ing, 60 Farrell Street. The The Bur fin ,.ton Free Press y� ure frames, etc. No Main, Barre 479-0234 amendment consists of 1 Il ll >�����i Q 17 BURLil1%N Giant * FANTASY # converting 500 square 802_660'1V01 e. something for ev- Convert clutbr to easy WO one! Antiques too. Entertamale dancers. Inc Ip 39 Airport Dr.. Satur- Male' f 347-2468 *s a Fro* Call 511-=s . ad ■ & Sunday, 9-5. GARAGE SALES 4 L l tl`sttrtrw�.��•..._ . --- — feet of general office I t W o Divisions Ch'I- NO. HERO Flea Market SOth nsBURet e1NGl Os t 99 HARDBODIES space to bakery and deli- prior to for- s. to-- Sponsored by 2 Girls bike, toys. >ssor. Hero Fire Dept.. (RNorth clothes, lawn furniture. #1 exotic dance co. catessen use. mulating future ". sd. North Hero, Quality dancers for all Station). Sat., 6/28, 9-4. ST. ALBANS events. 1-800-370-2223 4) Preliminary plat appli- p l a n s a n d i HA Ethan Allen bdrm. furni- Moving sale) NEW ENGLAND'S cation of Francis J. Von- I t•3321, tJe, jungle gym, wicker Located on the corner of HOTTEST DANCERS Turkovich, Patricia A. ` furniture, almost new Lincoln and Bishop St. For any occasion, or Stratman for subdivision procedures. Sat &Sup, 9 5. of a 9.8 acre parcel into cribs, bikes, collectibles. fantasy. 802-244-5457 three (3) lots of approxi- The Tons of stuff! STOWE 1568 Moscow mately 1.9 acres, 2.1 Interpreters will .� al Ga- Rd. Sat. 8-4pm. Playmate Ent. Bache- b e a .V a Fami- NORTH FERRISBURGN Furni- lor, 1 on 1, for any occa- acres, and 5.8 acres, 300 surest Corner of Hollow &Wit• ture, studio bed, clothing, sion. Gorgeous dancers- Swift Street. Major Philo Rd. Multi house- mirrors, picture frames. 802-865-2069 able. For further hold sale. Furniture, Co ies of the applica- (n a - d into housewares, clothing for UNDERHILL Microwave, SOLID GOLD DANCERS P Indus- Birthda s, Strip-0- lions are available for ( n O r >ols, a the whole tamily, toys belt sander, sewing ma- yy public inspection at the t 1 O n, contact and baby items, antique chine lotsOfstuff! Fri, Grams Bure cra ach-1377tte) outh Burlington City N e I - s), jew- tools, books, and lots supplies,parties Call 882-1377 B r U c e iething Sat & Sun, 10-6, Fit 15 at Hall. more. Sat.9-3pm. son at 241-2186 & Sun Willowbrook between {r r shine. RICHMOND Fri & Sat, 9- Underhill & Cambridge. ULTIMATE William Burgess t h e sad El- 4. Sun, 9-12. HUGE. PRIVATE Chairman, f O r ,I and Clothes, toys. VW Gulf UNDERHILL Yard Sale, South Burlington Vo- pans, furn. & misc. 100 June 28 & 29, Sam -Spin. SESSIONS Planning Commission DivlSlOn Of a videos c a t l O n a l Riverview Commons. Furniture, books, parties & more! Females June 28, 1997 vloving and more! Route 15, fol- service to your 6/28 & RICHMOND Fite 2. Corn- low the signs. males, Vhitetail puter desk with printer family door for VT&NY. PUBLIC HEARING Rehabilitation, Hail Rd. table, welding gas WESTFORD 4 Y SOUTH BURLINGTON o r S t e v gauge, Mt. bikes, turn- sale, guns, fishing tackle, PLANNING 'shines, new gift shop snow blower, 800-449-4122 COMMISSION Stone at 24�- ' family items, books, and free mower, furniture, toys & Employmen[Opportunities 2 2 1 Q f O r Saxon stuff. Fri. 11-7, Sat. 10-3, games & lots & lots of The South Burlington Clothes, misc. items. First right INSTRUCTION 9 Planning Commission the nivicinn fnr stereo Sun 10-3. after Westford Store )q fence SHELBURNE ^_3 Family r,ntn WPctfnrd ('.-­ LEGALM"-----WANW II NOTICES feet of general space to baker °ftice deli- catessen y and use. 4) Preliminary Plat appli- cation of Francis J, Vonon Patricia q Turkovich, A. Stratman for subdi of a 9.8 acre vision three (3) lots offarcel into mately 1 g acresePPr 2x acres, and 5.8 , 2.1 Swift Street. acres, 31)Q Copies of the aPPlica- tions are available for Public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission June 28, 1997 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission at the So will hold o public hearing uth Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on July 15 1997 at 7:30 P.M. to con- sider the following: 1) Revised final plat ap- plication of Magic Hat to amend a planned unit de- velopment consis ing of three (3) buildings on a 6.8 acre parcel, 5 Bartlett Bay Road. The amend- ment consists of minor changes to parking, cir- culation and loading in the vicinity of the light manufacturing facility (brewery). Copies of the application j are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. i William Burgess Chairman, South Burlington Planning Commission June 28, 1997 PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION The South Burlington Planning Commission Will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on July 15, 1997 at 7:30 P.M. to con- sider the following: 1) Final plat application Of Wright & Morrissey/ Vermont Gas for a Planned unit develop- ment consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a new 39,- 728 square foot building for general office use and a bank with drive - through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street. 2) Final plat application of Dan Morrissey and Marie and Albert St. Amand for a boundary line adjustment involvingg 7,500 square feet of land, 57 and 59 Swift Street. 1i 3) Revised final plat ap- plication of Eldo's Cafe, Wright and Morrissey, and National Gardenin9' to amend a planned unit development consisting of a 41,000 square foot general office building and an 11,400 square' foot general office build- ing, 60 Farrell Street. The amendment consists of converting 500 square Convert clutter to cash with a Free Press ClossMed a& CA6S111-3321. S7" A-A44 nj b mot- bAu m 6 2-f.,1 S-4 G"-( w��P ;�,�c�r �j�z D e4g;rz� C'j�v�-0, ST7T ?Z, 41// ;pia � w� U, shtikn-5 lU.-�LJs A--t— l�'^✓ JL ��nM�r vs �o e - ;w COMBINED DATA PARCELS A h 8 j6y& #a5 l� I . l• - J. Area, Density and Dimensional Requirements: proposed (w/ ' •.o, Aiiowabie P d R.O.W. Adjustment) .n Minimum Lot Size: 417,000 s-f. 283,575 s-f- 277,891 s f 1 • L�- Total Acreages 4 Acres(PUD) 8.51 Acres 8.38 Acres Number of Lots: 2 2 e( # As Minimum Lot Frontage: 350 feet 685 feet 685 feet. e Maldmum Building Coverage: 30.0% 9.5% 9.7% `I, -", ti 'ip �� Maximum Front Yard Coverages 30.0% 33.OX 25.4% s ueet�Cu t f� Eoc,noR Maximum impervious Area: 70.0% 80.5%* 60.5%* L T of Land Use: Commercial Office l3uitdin ' 7 YPs 9 1 tow RECHVED *Includes future roadway and access Improvements at 85 Swift Street CAWMAW 1 , ` `� I t f JUN 1 3 1997 - ALL HECEBBARY EAseMerrS FOR LOCATIONMAP THE PROPOSED aCOVALK AND BIa3°ATH ACAO68 THE CCC&I AW F UE Raw, SLEW" SCALE: 1 2 a PROPERTY HAVE NOT 8�� OBTAE® f AND BEaIA111 EAS0111T M-Hun City of So. Burlington PROPOSED SEEWALK }} Alit SG E PATH / - - - - _ i HMt'FHot�erts } i PARCEL B �F85 1 1 i I 1 1 e AEMMD- 77 " %''pgpp�p I I I �� i �1 ro • - ye- oassec caHrra>7e _ CON � E \ �N� use T / •a l L HEADWALL caNc MONUMENT fA b 6bOy w WATER LEE A. C [vv)� �� I `.:. ?,,� •. .. ,. 9ETER MANHOLE STORM MANHCUE i I \'\\\. I \ �\ -m_ i R AY ,• `� _. \\ �'\� i 0 WATER SHUT-OFF VALVE o\EF&EAD ELECTRIC POLE y I �� f P 111 Lv FE& I r ® CATCH 8AS1i A4 I FL A '46 �,,:.; 1 EPp y r I I'; tN�v2o � Cis ��J s�. �� l ` LmH T POU �. 8 f MGM w— \\V r TREES � en { *Oise � 9 1 N, j I `UN DqMXI—� a�aas, rw \ V� l rwwvwv r, Ena� of Eav7w000s FOR �� �� \ —0 0-. Eroamo R ICE �1 �brd1 Y- &'atl AEiM sLrw wr �� �, ,rIoabr� .�..�. AUSM a sfw AW90FA OF p � � SCAM y� SWIFT STREET r..�P.U.Q. GRAPHIC SCA �7' A Fri- SAV REVISED PROPOSED FUTURE ROADWAY 57F 69 & 85 SWIFT eke, q 4 -s-o> SAV AS PER PRFLNNARY COMMENTSOVERALL SITE PLAN ,� 05226 C tr-1�B> SAV ADDED ADOFD FUTURE ROADWAY r-` N A USEtejs(c* BOB CA9t°d Re1Ae1011 t IN FL7R T fmh = Dram bye Dab APRIL 1997 SHEET CMalted by JP Sods 1' — 40'*�-- MIL ENW*MUW ASSMA7M Wf• •� Approved by SAV Pro}at NO. 97150 SHELBURNE, VERMONT 1 si I EXIST. CB � � � � ippl .�, �<. 1� RIMINV IN 182.79.69 I !N�- �- 07d INV OUT = 179.36 �., COItG�'CaC"FTBASew ,..'Rt' Storogc bunkers An, .�nd by N-190.0 PROPOGED y ` r -- EXIST. DMH -�� CIF UREI!l"LA gBTRDCT G Rl7 RETAININGWALL 043OW Gorwe ���� �-...-- -- RIM = 182.66 �_ -� Vag T-p� 11LL - INV IN - 179.95 _--:— . -- ---- - - tB� _._ _.._-----�. -. _ _ - �� INV OUT - 179.83GE SWALE - e • a ffr7*E FLli Isom NEW Onu Oran 00~ I s �� � -�� F!d ^'fY3.3� � ,M—w0�oonaw " MA m Dam mamumuff 4r. .. � ii / .._ .MWt,•.O. lra� w -- NV - 1BUe - -- E OawrAo aawc 1 c G �� ' _ - • IN w.nu 1 - . ,�" �:.."1.-.r 1fi' trr... q F826 UTURE :, PROPOSED B�1LC>�Nc '.. -.ramom MA , tr ' ' F F. ELEV. = 0 r //� ■ aaa wi ROOF-ELEV. - 248.0' ( r 3 1997 uaff �` • O e ® OUW» Ras ow mmvmm rasa of So. Burlington t Rawl • li4♦! / ..., � � ,,:' F,�/ .�.', I / / � r /,. � O 1g3 • t r ,.r '�' rAPPNO BLEEvE r; / i / // AND vnwe •' a 1' / ....RAMPW(ATpYKPJ ;%<: j ' j/i'- % , �°,.e' ����� `:;,•�//,/<� 60i1 wb,tc,o .... ..-d.....d» �9 �, % „ OUM I'BT�i YT, AREA t wirer .l wA r wrr r ti a Yl-•. wwwr rr.r�. 3 �L � �' _,- �.�) '� i' f� 1 1r dnYslor TIIMw• M•Me ate- iw . EXIST. SMH RIM = 197.27 INV. 8'=192.77 tD r.+•+rs «err ter. L`Lh r NV. 8"=193.77 j9 I I NV. 8• =193.77 NV. 8"FM-193.77 BENCHMARK t ,c„w•0r'sr y�.,rw 'rier."r'w .au� "'w'r t°' '. FF NE CNR OF BRED HtV _ 2012 ,-- r. r r r r » prr.A rrw. BENCHMARIK I. AW NAL N PP ti �°j i- ?� 10 / PRDP09FD WOOD/ �p i t " MONaV �w.ir*1- N OW ` H.EV -1Afl39 E I 10-j QNN-lAC FENCE t aFld �al''J(6 I I Can7lj l « 0.r k &A -Wk*..r i�. `wtl.�. _. -8 _ „ ...` ... --- t >v r+.ww r. rr o•r r r.+..4 wre. r � � � DIan7N1j• to '.'iL''''�.a +w � ..�.r�� ►w � I,9 a Mini Storage units ��M• It N wt .nr r » r awll.«�R el d- MII« •.sail � N � wiY Y » N XII 1 ;. 0..r�:�1r°r r.�r< .r �ewor.�..•��« a r.e•.w•r. �j House �ri 2U3 u veti rx .oe aN i7 r a.rq. w �� _� __ -- __ . M► �rbw. r ..d 9 _ .� 1' I — - u�. A�i.»a »w. wK r. wM.� .r o. r■a..r • 200 + i II Mmi Storage units � D� I� p II EXIST. (� I SAY REVISED PROPSMAFT STREET POSED FUTURE ROADWAY • • • 1 JJaa MM7R�I177 RIM = 200.0 II _ - - OF SAY REVISED AS PER PRE1lMINARY COMMEN 75 PROPOSED ��NG - INV. ---------- �• A _ _. s-.SAY ADDED SIOEW/JJC, FENCE SI ty� PPLM� 1 GRAPHIC SCALE: � � A SAY REVISED GRADING, RET. WALL, SIDEWALK m a m .o ee • Aab o DOB Chh(d FDevYIOn r 201 a r� Dram by MJW Dope APRIL. 1997 SHEET ( IN 1'>IET Cheated by JP code 1" = 20' CIVL E NGNMMG ASSOCIATM @IC° SHELBURNE, VERMONT 1 A - _ -.. _._ -tnoc eD n. SAV 97150 -. e ITN . AQp(oved by Project Na I ■, L_l Ll I� PROPOSED RAISED ... : LETTER SIGN ON RETAINING WALL 1, PROPOSED- r I SIDEWALK PROPOSED SIDE WALK 5SS IAP 3 PROPOSED BUILDING 3 PS I JT1 I I -I I 1 1 -- rSTOCR I FENCE 3 BP I / 7 S�-�, + -� 1 P �FYI 2 AS ,1 I 10S 3Q 2AS 7 38P t I r. _ 1 `PROPOSED NEW I LIMIT OF GRAVEL i f I I 1 i' STOCKADE 1 ' MINI STORAGE i PLANT LIST FENCE I ( I 1 I I 1 Qp I �------ ----- -l., I EXISTING LIMIT — .I 1 P OF GRAVEL ♦ _� I I • I I I. qvr •�rs.r. . ., s' � ..eA. � I 1 . •. PROPOSED 21' PAVED DRIVEP. l�� ---- --------.----- ------------------- SWIFT STREET P.U.D. PROPOSED MORRISSEY BUILDING CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH I SOUTH BURLINGTON VERMONT RECEIVED Jt1N 13 1997 City of So. Burlington 5�'M OTY SCIDMIC NAMErAF$WW.AD1Ek)0NYM1A NAM[ so CONO AS 12 Ac ycdyrum ' • A IQ' CAL 668 6P N eenli «. N f 10'•1 -NOT. 6N EA 22 lNlbt 26'-62't1GT 11" [ 65 lVi Mdtnentit' EEN A041KA 26'-T0'NGT. 666A! t0 MRIutDittA4 NCRAI 21/2'-1'CK IM ES 16 PFvn slr&a ►E - 10' NO1. 666 N 16 Aron strobe /Wf '• IFNGT. 6Y 9 0,Wm strut PM OAK ' • 4112' CAL 666 Sv 1. 'rta v«Mwmw AMq 111 $POIA 2.'• ID' MI 6" SS 26 a w Ark'Sem+6on' SEMAn(Ns LRAC I • 1' NOT. W. EC 12 Th. T«dau 1i ITTLE LEAF UNDEN 1' • 6 IR' CAL 61! VT 26 VI.— bib— abal— M--- CRA!lfRRV6USN V61. 21'-)b'NGT. 666 SCALE: 1'. 20' ... . .,1 DATE: 5.9.97 Revised: Aaa.e vtw. nn.r 108: 97714 WRIGHT & MORRISSEY, INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS May 2, 1997 60 Farrell Street., Suite 401, So. Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 863-4541 P.O. Box 421, Burlington, VT 05402 Fax 865-1253 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Attention: Mr. Joe Weith Re: 69 Swift Street P.U.D. Dear Joe: This is to follow up on our meeting of April 29, 1997 where we discussed the City's desire to refine our proposed plan for the above referenced project to better accommodate the purpose and spirit of a P.U.D. As agreed, we are now showing a road connecting within the proposed P.U.D. and will post a bond to guarantee its future construction. As discussed, a future connecting road might be better located in a different location should the contiguous parcels become available for development and desire to become part of this P.U.D. We have preserved this future opportunity, but we have agreed to build the road as currently shown whenever the City may decide that it should be built. We appreciate the opportunity to discuss this issue with you and are happy that we were able to reach an agreement. If you have any other questions or suggestions, we would be happy to discuss them with you. Sincerely, Daniel B. Morrisse President DBM/kll A"1471�le Alt /.o4 yg� 3% `7;z �5 S�— �P�y,�2. s� �Q✓c�.�. ry y 7� Z� City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 12, 1997 Dan Morrissey Wright & Morrissey P.O. Box 421 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Office Building & PUD, 57, 69 & 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Morrissey: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658.7958 Enclosed is a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision on the above referenced project preliminarily approved by the Planning Commission on May 13, 1997. Please note the conditions of approval including the requirement that the final plat application be submitted within 12 months. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sin erely J Weith, C ty Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl N City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 June 9, 1997 Dan Morrissey Wright & Morrissey P.O. Box 421 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Office Building & PUD, 57, 69 & 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Morrissey: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the May 13, 1997 Planning Commission meeting minutes. Please note the conditions of approval and the requirement that the final plat application be submited within 12 months. If you have any questions, please give me a call. i cere Joe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp 1 Encl 5/13/97 MOTION OF APPROVAL WRIGHT & MORRISSEY, INC. I move the South Burlington Planning Commission approve the preliminary plat application of Wright & Morrissey, Inc. for a planned unit development consisting of the existing Vermont Gas building and a new 41,000 square foot building for general office use and a bank with drive through service, 69 and 85 Swift Street, as depicted on a 10 page set of plans, page two (2) entitled "Swift Street P.U.D. 57, 69 & 85 Swift Street Overall Site Plan," prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc, dated April, 1997, last revised 5/8/97, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not superseded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit for the office building, all appropriate legal documents (e.g. irrevocable offer of dedication and warranty deed for the street widening) shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and recorded in the South Burlington Land Records. 3. The applicant shall construct a 10 foot wide sidewalk/recreation path along that portion of the project's frontage which does not currently have a sidewalk/recreation path. This sidewalk/recreation path shall be continuous across the Couillard property with the appropriate legal documents or constructed within the existing Swift Street r.o.w. This sidewalk/recreation path shall be constructed prior to occupancy of the office building and to the specifications approved by the Public Works Director. Prior to start of construction of the sidewalk/recreation path, the applicant shall post a bond which covers the cost of the sidewalk/recreation path. 4. The plans shall be revised prior to final plat submittal as follows: a) The plan shall be revised to show the future internal access drive connecting with the southwesterly corner of the parking lot at 85 Swift Street instead of the northwesterly corner. b) The plans shall be revised to show detailed design of the future internal access drive (e.g., grading, slope, drainage, etc.). Also, the plans shall be revised to show the parking spaces removed in those locations where the internal access drive connects to parking lots. c) The plan shall be revised to note the type of screening 11 proposed for the new dumpster. i Id) d) The overall site plan shall be revised to show the sidewalk along the front of the proposed office building as i shown on sheet 1A. e) The plans shall be revised to show the proposed 10 foot wide combination sidewalk/recreation path along the entire frontage of the project, including the area in front of the Couillard property. 5. The proposed internal future access drive shall be constructedv( within three (3) years from the date gf final approval. ✓�►+�; G� � �l 6. Pursuant to Section 26.J�6(b) of the zoning regulation the`T Planning Commission approves M parking waiver for the proposed office building. It is the Commission's opinion that IAJq-spaces will adequately serve the project since a significant portion of the gross square footage of the building will be devoted to uses which typically do not generate parking demand. 7. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a $28,500 landscape bond. The bond shall remain in effect for three (3) years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 8. All new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. Details of any building mounted lights shall be approved by the City Planner prior to permit issuance. Details of lighting on #85 Swift Street shall be submitted prior to final plat. 9. For the purpose of calculating road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the proposed office builidng will generate additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. The estimated number of vte's will be determined at final plat. 10. Pursuant to Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations, the Planning Commission approves a 16 foot height waiver for the proposed office building. The Commission has determined that this taller structure: (i) will not affect adversely the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (ii) will not detract from the important scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of -way. 2 11. The P anni C missi "`h hereby mpdi,fies it's sewer ---policy and al owl the ap icant to ansfe 8�Q gpd`�y of unusec�,,,...s�wer capacity at 6Q' Farre Street o this pro'l,ect. ' 11. The Planning Commission grants a sewer allocation of 850 gpd for the new office/bank building. At this time, the project will be placed on the waiting list for sewer capacity. The determination on whether unused sewer capacity at 60 Farrell Street may be transferred to this project, and therefore allow this project to bypass the waiting list, will be made at final plat. 12. Prior to final plat submittal, the applicant shall investigate whether there are any wetlands along the stream crossing 85 Swift Street. If wetlands are found, they shall be shown on the final plat plans. 13. The applicant shall record in the land records, a "Notice of Condition" which clearly indicates that this project constitutes a PUD and that for zoning and planning purposes the entire property will be regarded as a single parcel of land. This document shall require approval of the City Attorney and shall be recorded prior to recording the final plat plans. 14. The final plat application shall be submitted within 12 months, C No Text m ',�'�r'�'r'�1,�� }�� - •' '�� tom, �t�(yyy///�+, .r '"�', _� �-� its Ir IN spy?• jr gig ip • . ����I♦ "�. �` kai i. �, #'r`�i d; ,,.. •c ra.! / �1 �1 ���'ti� } \�#fit ,�`. � Sr,���':t�'' ra ��y�,{, ik. �iLi Y� r xl i 3, ,..• � � �h�-.. 4 ��_ # S i t {� � 'M'.�'� 9'u6• N �lY^3tiw.�', x•^ IL#.. 'rt Wilt , %r .t t H'}� .' 1 Vtl. � `' }•aiarr� e,•. 1 ? a ,� ri,fis ryttti2'�, i M�f � e�e � Nr� �. 3 : ' r :�� � `Z',• �a # ,'�c �� ! is � -1 #f i`_.' . � +�, �! �At;Q �' qt�}z rY k-y`Fat t l � � b � � ► �•L a a.%� ^�+ • � ! �y�+ y..X �� sin .g� i k ' h • { lip + °' Y16� \ `t 1j 3♦ �♦ a v� 7�j,+j. < } •} 1.1 {:" M'..,: v �, . p �•�TTi�y4� 1 -r# � ,r �} �3 d a +& �Px' ,.t j h OVA '11 �!��,� a., � r:�t.r4���° " t .�t •• r,r� '� -''^� �^{;�,j}7C>�4'!,'fy�'�2 •� �� �tti t � � t.: t j ria IAA� * !j # MMMy3¢3¢ \�, r"I�i• # it tI. �t# r+�L+r'i WOE.' All to ShNbume Rood/?IS Rout' 7 6 i4' rwx,s IS S►Mt Street Charles ,IENN/NGS ✓duets JJ4 Pope 9J J' rw, aM _ �.bwa s1,a6 Burlington Highways end Volume / Pope /4 1 lot A/fer 6— Volume 1 Poge S 8 _ i7' E S 84 ;50 ;J7' £ I00.. 6 s1FYNWsaw• S7L — 50 Svrri Sbxt I S7 Swilt Street ' P—e to 6e co,cteted 59 Sw//f Street can.vyed to I PQ ccar to De St. Arnand Oontel Area - 0.17 AC ss MORRISSEY-'' Daniel N«ird 31hMORR/SSEY .A 8 `8 corapa W 2 oaf 6 r-17 a, 7 HLote 50 Srifi Street 2 Swilt Slrset I 59 SwiR Street Mork Mork Albert STEPHENS 5T£PHENS and Morie I volume 211 IVourme 211 Poge 121 St. AMAND I P 111 17 pt � C C. 0 ore She 7 s0 DO' 65E `w, Ps.so, w' QSE rA N 841926- w N 8I4976 W 110.02- (e.X' 1a SsE) , of ^I O M (6K I. O 59 Sw//t Street Albert and Morie St. AMAND Vbl— 371 Pope 560 w111 Sea. I .1 Vol—* J71 Page 557 I lcpvoy ,e, J994 Volume 79J Pope 54 1 1 AI'r J4 199a: I I 1 U q �ry Sclamin and Mountaho HANDY 3 ✓dome JJ4 Pogo 45z » Ott— act 19V c h I last 1 tra4er ll 1 -- - - -- - MM `s e4v4 07• Ems"' 6• 'Moab ew+rxne+l 10 thle—wood Duos erne Rose and Harvey 12 [kWc—aod 3:ve RUEI Thomas DOAIVE ✓dome 25 Page 464 S. ryso Vb✓nme 16' Page I31 Iueurl 17, 'Yaa J" het OM rani (" ou E i S 69 Sr/ff Street - a Donie/ MORRISSEY Hours Volume J98 Pope 224 b $�rsmew � 1996 F e NEW eft Street to Spewsb«t 8450•J7' w A15PN JJ24. 49' — — — p3 t"fie. 79 5"Y Street John, Jim and Jerry COUILLARD I Vdune JC6 Pope 12 ar1a6— 2L Ie97 I Ho<,s I p (3 tit h aI0 1� Survey Hole_: 1 1. AN beo--�'qs ve calcuioled and re/eranced to Asfrmwn:c North. AatrmOmk North ►os Wlermi,ed from o Solar obser,rotuan on Fedvar-y 16, 1995 the sdor obserwlion was token of frors�se pohf 6 borlsighfny pouf 1. ✓oynetic North was ob--d o1 of hawse A'Mt I usr,g o fub'dor co pose m February IS, 1995 Mogn,tk North is /J 71 west of Asfionomk North. 2 A dosed troves' reps eo Weted An Fed- ay I995 —s'q o total Sfof/o'r (Sokio Set JB). AddWl of AWd ►ark was con{oleted h Apr4 of 1997 J Me plot of ss y is fw the sole use of Oonla 9 Morrissey and use by olbw property owners, pri.ofe w munkpa! Is 4—cikasy wnauthr6ed. 4. Irowse pohts we no 4 (J/8) reh/rckg bars with •trawre point ptosfk COOS un/ess oMerwite noted m Vermont Gas Systems Inc. b lo; volume 199 Pope 177 a A<rt 73 last W Ir� 1p 12 MORR/SSEY PARCEL + - Area - 224 ocrer I Autc Body C—qe bu.W 6" our 11 I�l Vermont Gcs Syslcros, /nc. IJ VW— 199 Po9a 477 .(Orr 7S 19ee 63 Switt Strsef Daniel MORRISSEY Vbhumo 400 Page JJ9 ctrmw 2 rpm Cw.eee...,avn.nr t S h.,�d 61-�w1 lcand 6" ov! �69.9T ps 7.11p11 59.92" N 8i 45 i3 W N 85tJ0?3- W N 8-FJZJ7 14 L'rdenwood &rw I 16 [e,d—.Ood 0, J8 Lhdenwood &Ae Carolyn Potricio 6rion and Jeanne ` A#rCH£LL BOOSKA S11EA and Dorothy y I volume 11J Pope 122 f Voume 215 Po9s 517 FLEM/NG Aueual 16. I9ee Vov J,t r9a6 nV me 284 Page 427 5m—,r 74 '9119 ,r�.�. _References_ 1 'Roe of Sw.vy - Armand and Dono'd Meek• 46 Swill St-1 -Sa.M Su liu,gton. ✓amon! by .*Lace uwsh r owkr9 C-691 lost retied 71211936. recwukd dof Dank 200 page 61 I Alan o/ Property o/ JWio Austin - South Bur/119ton or Arthur H000 Ind Assoelot's N—bsr 1947 1317 —rded in Volume 11 pogo 207. �. Leon of LotS o+ rarm of Fronk Cormier, South Burthgto, by ..sees 5,nclak. Sspfembw 191J ? Propertr n1 Nanw J Nbau/f by C've En9.harhp A—i,,e9 :seised '/O.ember 1, 1966 Storage bunkrs Jl - --�-- - Ca+nrfe monwnml - --� 1 o JO' out WupeSE 20 - 21 -1 ndk wood 04- Ralph and Groce ARUZZ4 'W,-, 21I Page J89 [La'rmpr r 'Se6 ✓wvets r10 Fog' ^02 w. 2 yen' I e0 V. :Y.1 BAR SCALE Location Map not to sco e Boo dory Notes I. the Deaayfrons cont-&,q Me locofions of the boundaries of the /and sur-'ed and the physkd —bi—* /ocoted and existing a the 9—d ►are carpoied pool ondyred to provide baundwy /ocefxxts Mot ore most hdcelim Of the wiperal inlmt of the deeds and h, hom,my with axisthp mwwmnlollan. Mhere —ScIs between physkd enidenw and written etfdence we subsfanfid, deeds and/w abcumants VA ld be w wN/ be executed to dkn[x/e ony odor of title or cm8kl. 2 Ihh pot of army depklr boundary /ocofk , of /ands under the 01, Of Donial 8 Mwnss y and also the lmi[s, sere *noon, of eosanenfx licenses ond/w other sr,4tudes and rights that may enoumbw Or ben'Af the savxysd premhes J .NoWM—ts how bean set h and m the pound where SAO— On the plot of surrey wows, kr fAe oai,bn of the sumycr, It was necesawy to perpetuate o comer —I otherwise monumented Mowm nts sAoen as —,ow: be set• wAC be set of the f/t/e holders diectIM 4. My boundary fie /o M^ bused err deeds or oacomn is recoroed h Me public records by which IRAs or r1pus was c mpvd to Dovfet d Morrissey , or tff/e or r/9dr is h fords of DwW B. Mwdkrey were otherwise de/M'oteq is subject to occ—y and /.panty of those deeds or doct ner Is Mhw# fhcw deeds r documents ow kr4pr4"Hy executed as o moffw of /o► r cmtats arras or ami j:R?s h fact, cr Conlon or ors Dosed cpa•, erroneous concAuswu of tow. Me+ the depkled b—dry facotions may not be n 'W 5 the boundary /ere /oc 6—s shotm we atw su6fect to aceur .y and legally or lock of ovlborify of any 9rontw Or parts. rho p-o/weed the rip't Orobilly to ca,roy, rece/w Orcmdann property r'46ts :n Me —1-d ygpertle 6. Any depklrwr o the plots of surrey of &Oundry knee w oNer structure; exdrJiW of boundary /roes IIw Don.ef it Ma>issey were 1x tod by foOhewnetry, fie /a Mo l and dapicti o/ boasdary lkw olhr tha, those of D-1.1 B. Morrissey " not wwr W and aA 1--'Obry Ih'a dgokted r* subject to Me accuracy and colnplefa,ess of the Pudic record 7 S�TWaI arras re subject to conAkthg boundary One /o Ikv7s and hors been kda,lf6ed Orr this plot of sw.vy. 7hsse ccrtgktr should be w ham bear dlrposed of by papr legal meonx fie fart o/ the effect of OdWse pas»odor; ac9uiesrnce Orrd pacfko' forohorn, ecrebar and o.u'skV Or raktan, If the# Is Or was ory% has been tdnt/Awd Mrs kno►n. is that extent. Mete pots of survey may be subifsct to my w,lderffifell dorms of flots Assumptions !r correc6ress and occkracy re ktdkofed oo the plot of army. 8 1he plot Of sxwy is /a tM "" use of 04,41 B. Morrissey and the user by othw proprty ownaA pn'wfe Or munk.po( 4 spectAco'fy un vfhodred 9. h odJlian 10 this surxy dot, a surwC,cr.e abstract and aur-,K -'s -,00rf were pqp ce.. Mr snw/a-•s obstroct hcl.&s the chrmdogkd chah of tiNe /w the lands Of Dar'al B. Mcrrissax Me ovondogkal ohohs of t/He /r o6ufth9 Prcpert4s and othw d —c Is and drub rdoted to eos—es, servitudes and othw Hghfs IN, surrey abstract is eNect;- through Ap,7 J 1997. 77» sumyw•s rgpwf narrates the onalysa and evoluofkrt, /opk and conclusions used to locate the boundwfes OeP/cled on this plot of surrey. The surwjtvs obstioct and repo,( ore port of this su rey I Uura : rrxe � Da>Tr Legend_ -,- 7romrse/CoWrot pot Cmcrrle Or Marble etc' --I round • km pee loved O Calculofed pok,t n. Ufaty Pole Underpovod dectrred kna U�d- ground ,as /hr Property the ;'rlpht of ray =silt/] Memorandum - Planning May 13, 1997 agenda items May 9, 1997 Page 5 --- indicate that the southerly property boundary line is the boundary between the Cl District to the north and R4 District to the south. --- show reserved strip for future street widening. --- property lines to be dissolved should be clearly indicated as such. 6) WRIGHT & MORRISSEY - OFFICE BUILDING & PUD - PRELIMINARY PLAT This project consists of: 1) constructing a 41,000 square foot 4- story general office building (including a bank with drive -through service), 2) combine two (2) contiguous lots into a planned unit development (69 and 85 Swift Street), and 3) construct a parking area at 57 Swift Street. The lot at 57 Swift Street will be combined into the PUD after a boundary line adjustment is approved. The sketch plan was reviewed on 3/11/97 (minutes enclosed). These properties located at 57, 69 and 85 Swift Street lie within the Cl District. They are bounded on the east by the access to Farrell Park, on the north by Swift Street and an auto body repair shop, on the south by Farrell Park and several residences, and on the west by a mini -warehouse complex. Access/circulation: Access to the PUD will be provided by a 36 foot curb cut at 85 Swift Street, and a 24 foot curb cut at 69 Swift Street. An internal future access drive is proposed which would connect 69 Swift Street and 85 Swift Street. Staff recommends that this access road connect with the parking lot at 85 Swift Street at the southwesterly corner instead of the''1�� northwesterly corner. This would disturb less green area. This access road should be shown on the site plan for 69 Swift Street. This access drive would be constructed at a later phase of development. Staff recommends that the access drive be constructed` within three (3) years. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: Combined 57 and 69 Swift Street: Building coverage is 29.9% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 69.9% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 30% (maximum allowed is 30%). 5 Memorandum - May 13, 1997 May 9, 1997 Page 6 Planning agenda items Entire PUD: Building coverage is 16.1% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 57.0% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 24.5% (maximum allowed is 30%). 85 Swift Street: Building coverage is 8.8% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 50.2% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 21.6% (maximum allowed is 30%). Entire PUD: Building coverage is 16.1% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 57.0% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 24.5% (maximum allwowed is 30%). Coverage information for the property which would exist after the street widening must be submitted. This information was requested but not submitted. Setback requirements are met. Parking: The proposed office building requires a total of 172 spaces and 156 spaces are being provided including six (6) l l handicapped spaces. This is an It space or - . 1% shortfall .,'Nil�l✓`A� Applicant should be prepared to justify this shortfall. A bike ) v�r rack is being provided as required under Section 26.253(b) of the! zoning regulations. The plans should show all the parking spacesi,, �Vk at 85 Swift Street. The plans should be revised to remove the, QO three (3) spaces eliminated by the access road on the 69 Swift Street parcel. The parking standards require that each drive -up window have sufficient stacking room for six (6) cars and that a by-pass lane be provided. Staff is concerned that the proposed stacking lanes will block parked cars and access aisles. Landscaping: The minimum landscaping requirement, based on building costs, is $28,500 which is being met. Plantings will include Sugar Maple, Littleaf Linden, Austrian Pine, Juniper and Cedar. The plans should include all existing landscaping at 85 Swift Street. Traffic: A traffic impact evaluation report has been submitted (see enclosed). This report concludes that "with respect to traffic congestion, the results of the intersection capacity analyses indicate that this project will not create any significant traffic impacts, and that acceptable levels of service will be experienced during future design hour conditions at all Memorandum - May 13, 1997 May 9, 1997 Page 7 Planning agenda items intersections included in this study." The study recommended that site grading be designed to enhance available intersection sight lines from the proposed project access. The study indicates that a signal will not be warranted at the Swift Street/Farrell Street intersection. ITE estimates that the proposed office building with a drive -through bank will generate 113.4 additional vte's during the P.M. peak hour. The applicant should be aware that the road impact fee is approximately $22,000. Building height: The applicant is proposing a 51.0 foot height for the office building and seeking a waiver for the additional 16 feet of height under Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations. This section allows the Commission to approve a height in excess of the 35 foot limitation provided the Commission determines that a taller structure: (i) will not affect adversely the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (ii) will not detract from the important scenic views from adjacent public roadways and other public rights -of -way. The applicant should be prepared to address these criteria at the meeting. Section 25.113(d) of the zoning regulations requires additional setbacks for each foot above the normal 35 foot height. These additional setback requirements will be met. Sewer: The additional sewer allocation needed for this project is 840 gpd,(this includes credits given for the removal of two (2) houses on the property). There is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. The applicant currently has excess capacity at his 60 Farrell Street project (see enclosed letters) and is requesting that the Commission modify its policy to allow the transfer of the unused capacity of 1143 gpd to this project. The Commission did allow a similar transfer for the 250 seat ballroom at the Quality Suite hotel on 2/4/92. Staff supports the applicant's request for the sewer transfer. P.U.D. report: A report addressing the PUD criteria under Section 26.151 of the zoning regulations was submitted (see enclosed). Memorandum - Planning May 13, 1997 agenda items May 9, 1997 Page 8 Sidewalk/street widening: The plans show a proposed sidewalk which would extend westerly from the terminus of the existing sidewalk along the project's frontage. The plans should show a reserved 4V strip to be dedicated to the City for the sidewalk and future street widening. Vl Recreation path: The Recreation Path Committee reviewed these plans for sketch plan review and submitted comments (see enclosed) . The Public Works Director has recommended that a concrete sidewalk ,- be provided. He has agreed to allow a five ( 5 ) foot paved path01-X? adjacent to the sidewalk similar to along Kennedy Drive. I� Lighting: Proposed exterior lights will consist of the following: W --- an unknown number of 400 watt metal halide lamps with downcasting shielded fixtures on 20 foot poles. --- an unknown number of 250 watt metal halide lamps with downcasting shielded fixtures on 16 foot poles. Applicant was requested to indicate the number of each type of light but this information was not provided. Details of proposed building mounted lights should be approved by the City Planner prior to permit issuance. Information on existing lighting at 85 Swift Street was requested but not submitted. Wetlands: It appears that there might be wetlands along the stream crossing 85 Swift Street. This should be checked and if wetlands exists, they should be delineated. Dumpster: The type of screening proposed for the dumpster should be noted on the plan. Notice of Condition: A "Notice of Condition" should be approved by the City Attorney and recorded in the land records prior to recording the final plat plans. This "Notice of Condition" should clearly indicate that for zoning and planning purposes the entire property will be regarded as a single parcel of land. Other: There is a significant amount of information still missing. Staff recommends that this application not be approved until all information has been submitted and reviewed. E:3 '1A WRIGHT & MORRISSEY, INC. GENERAL CONTRACTORS May 1, 1997 60 Farrell Street., Suite 401, So. Burlington, VT 05403 (802) 863-4541 P.O. Box 421, Burlington, VT 05402 Fax 865-1253 City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 Attention: Mr. Joe Weith Re: 69 Swift Street P.U.D. Dear Joe: Enclosed please find a letter from Civil Engineering Associates outlining the sewer capacity needed for the above referenced project (840 gallons per day). Please note that we have unused capacity from our 60 Farrell Street project of 1,143 gallons per day, not including the 750 gallons allocated to National Gardening Association's building. We respectfully request that the City allow us to transfer this excess capacity to meet the needs of our current project. We understand that the City has a policy which discourages this practice, to prohibit potential abuses of the permit process. We understand also that the City has allowed transfers of this nature to occur in the past if the request is reasonable. We only need 840 gallons per day. Please note that the State of Vermont has already given their blessing, subject to the City's approval (see attached). Thank you in advance for your attention to this request. If you need additional information or have questions, please call. Sincerely, k,4� - Daniel B. Morri sey President DBM/kll 1 Approved 1/25/83 Revised 7/23/91 SOUTH BURLINGTON SEWER POLICY AIRPORT PARKWAY SERVICE AREA AND BARTLETT BAY AREA REVISED 1. Effective Date This policy is effective immediately and shall extend until the vote on the sewer bond issue (expected: May, 1984). At that time, the policy shall be reevaluated based on the results of the bond issue vote, and the experience of the previous 16 months. 2. Inventory of Sewer Allocations by Project An inventory of all projects, partially built, or approved but as yet unbuilt, shall be compiled, showing GPD estimated for each project. 3. Increasing Remaining Capacity The amount of sewage capacity available for pending or additional projects may be increased, due to reduced infiltration or illegal discharges, or modifications to the State Pollution Permit, or as otherwise deemed appropriate by the City Engineer. The amount of such increases, and the grounds for such increases shall be included in the City Engineer's semi-annual reports. The Plan- ning Commission shall reallocate surplus capacity in accord with the priority list. 4. Semi -Annual Reports The City Engineer, shall issue semi-annual (July 1, Jan 1) re- ports on sewage flow (GPD) and quality (BOD, TSS) to be compared to the conditions of the state pollution permit, and to the estimates originally made for each project during the review process. Actual construction progress to date, and anticipated construction through the next quarter shall be indicated, by project. 5. Allocation of Sewer Capacity At the time of preliminary plat approval for any development, the City Engineer shall establish a sewer allocation based on antici- pated sewage volume for that development. The allocation may be granted in phases or for an entire development. Applications shall be ranked on a priority list dependent on the date of preliminary plat approval and on the phasing schedule for the development. 1 Preliminary plat approvals may be granted with the condition that adequate sewer capacity must be available before final plat approval may be granted. If sewer capacity is still not avail- able at the time of plat application, an applicant may request an extension of his preliminary plat approval and phasing sched- ule. 6. Changes in Ranking on Priority List If a developer fails to build within his time limit "envelope" for any phase or fails to meet other conditions of his subdivi- sion approval, he shall lose his ranking on the priority list. However, the Planning Commission may grant one extension to the time limit for any portion of a development if it determines that the developer has provided substantial streets, utilities and other improvements and has reasonably pursued completion of the development. If a sewer allocation for any portion of development is lost, it shall be shifted progressively down the initial priority order to the next developer who is ready to seek final approval and to build in accord with his approvals. If it cannot be reallocated in this fashion, it shall be considered available for other purposes. Reassignment of sewer allocations, in this manner, shall be done by the Planning Commission, upon advice of the City Engineer. 7. Restriction In no case will the exchange of allotments for sewer capacity between separate lots, or properties under separate ownership, be permitted, except as permitted below: Projects located within the Bartlett Bay service area, which received Planning Commission approval prior to Jul21. 1991, may exchange their allotment for sewer capacity with other approved projects in the Bartlett Bay service area. Letters approving the exchange from both property owners shall be submitted to the City. The Planning Commission shall approve the exchange of allotments. 8. On Site Sewage Disposal Subdivisions which propose on site sewage disposal, in those ares of the city where the Comprehensive Plan and Capital Budget and Program project municipal sewer service, may not be approved for on site sewage disposal due to the current inadequacy of this service, regardless of soils or surrounding conditions, except with the approval of the Planning Commission. Subdivisions which propose on site sewage disposal where municipal sewer service is not projected in the Plan and Budget shall be evaluated according to all applicable local and State regulations and standards for on site sewage. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MARCH 1997 page 7 Regarding the bike path, Mr. Webster said they intend to have a sidewalk in front of the building. They also want to extend it to the next lot, if possible, and are willing to pay for it even though this is not their property. Mr. Burgess said the Rec Path people will want the sidewalk wide enough to accommodate the Path. Mr. Weith asked how the properties will be connected into a master plan development. Mr. Webster said they hope to have an internal parallel road so people don't have to go out to Swift St. Mr. Burgess noted that is not part of this plan and asked how the connection will be made now. Mr. Webster said it won't be. Mr. BzrgeE said there can't be a PUD without a connection. Mr. Morrissey said the properties are contiguous. Both Mr. Burgess and Mr. Weith said that was not the intent of a PUD. Mr. Dinklage suggested there be a commitment to create a connector before any other changes are made. Mr. Burgess stressed that these properties would have to be considered as one PUD for all time. Mr. Webster said they understood that. Mr. Webster then showed the stacking pattern. It was noted that when there are cars stacked, traffic will have only one way to go. Mr. Webster said tenants have agreed that the parking in the stacking area will be for employees, so there won't be traffic mingling with the stacking lanes. The by-pass lane would also remain open. Mr. Burgess said he was not convinced by this stacking plan. The Commission then reviewed its concerns with the plan: . the PUD concept stacking/by-pass lanes . added height criteria (including pleasing sight lines as traffic comes over the hill) parking waiver As there was no futher business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 9:10 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION 11 MARCH 1997 page 6 5. For _the _purpose_ of_calculating _road —impact _fees under the Sou_t_hBurlin_gton_Imeact_Fee _Ord inance,_ the_ Planning_ Commission estim_a_tes__tha_t_t_h_eer000sed_use_will_generate_10=4_vehicle_trip ends_ during_ the_P.M. peak hour. ������� 6. The applicant shall _obtain : a_zoning_oermit_within six months or_this_approval_is_null _and _void. 7=_The applicant_ shall_ obtaina_C_ertificate_ of_Occupancy Compli- ancefrom the _Administrative _Off icer_prior_to_occupanc=of the new _building-- 8._Any_c11ange to _the _site _ plan_ shall_ require_ approval_bv the South_ Burlington_ Planning=Commission, Mr. O'Rourke seconded:_ Motion= passed_unanimouslZ 7. Sketch plan applicationof Dan Morrissey for a project con- sisting of 1) constructing a 38,000 sq. ft. 4-story general office building (including a bank with drive -through service), 2) combine 2 contiguous lots into a planned unit development (69 and 85 Swift Street), and 3) construct a parking area at 57 Swift Street, 57► 69, and 85 Swift Street: Mr. Webster, representing Dan Morrissey and Vermont Gas, re- viewed the history of the properties. There are three parcels. The people who own the storage business will probably agree to a property line adjustment to make the 3 properties contiguous so there can be a PUD. Mr. Webster then showed the customer parking arrangement for the bank and for the stockbroker who will be on the second floor. The drive-thru traffic will go in a counter -clockwise pattern, actually under the building. Coverage is just about to the maximum. The office building will exceed the 35 ft. height maximum, but this can be done in a PUD. Mr. Burgess reminded the applicant that there will be criteria to meet for the added height. Mr. Webster then showed the building entrances. One end of the building will have a lobby with an elevator. The bank entrance will be off this lobby. Mr. Burgess stressed that the city wants the street face of the building to look like the front of a building. Mr. Webster agreed that this will be the case. The applicant is looking for a small parking variance. Mr. Burgess said the Commission is not willing to commit to this and noted there have been problems in other locations when parking standards have been waived. DATA PARCEL A /69 DATA FARM .. 6 d90 ' QPAM DATA PARCELS Ado 9 M i ft Area. Deeslty and O9nwwknd IbquFamsnts Ana, DooNty awi DtmerWpw! An4 Derw*y orM 09rw4aNd Rerukwrlente s • AeowWh RR0.K�dAd • . , . µ0�e P °� RED' Ad NloaobM H�oMa, R.6.Ml Ada MnMnwR Lot Styx 4Q.000 al: 97,574 at, 961W a.f•. 1 1 ./ ' � �: .', t .�. •,� ••^ Mkinum Lot 91ae: 40.W0 e.f. 97.574 at KIDD &f• Mk*nurn Lot St.. 40ADO a.c 153,000 at. 17OM24 af. Tetel Aa�e9c 4 Mnaa(PIRj 6.44 Acm 6.J7 Aaaa 1 I Mkinwn Lot Fr=A w 20D Nat 3DD feet 3DO hat M►Wrwrn Lot Frontogw 200 het 385 f.N 363 hN t4wnber of [.ote — 2 2 YaMrtw+n 6ui�p Cofwrapc 3a.OR 11.aR 11.31G MO*— didY,q OovwvOc 30,01 &ax 9.01G MtHmwn lot Frontage: 360 foot m tea m Nat Mmranm FI'art Yard 0asvpie 30.09 D0.9Z 3d6ff Mwbmm 50.96 30.9R 2&2i Ymdnwan 991dYq b.wopa XOX 9.6% GAX Mar3nm Yrgw�foua Are 70.01E 69.97G 7O.OR Mm&rwm Yip -ion Ar- 70.0% W29 50.0X Mmdrnan Front -0 Omwcyn 30.09 33.014 20.761< YMwrn SdDaoLx 11Y*nwrn Sdbockc Mm6run �rpwNo�s Area: 70.0A< 57.1X E6.1X Nat - Front 40 el Nat 61 NM - Front: 40 h►t 105 her 97 Nat I of lord Uwc Wmmwoid OMw Bu�dinq �.� - skh. 15 tee! 53 Lest w feet - Ski. 15 6WI 45 feef 45 feet - Raw. 30 Net 216 foot 216 foot - qew: 30 toot te0 1.0 160 feet SITEJ _. EocATlow �woac • , Pwkkrp Oenaal 6paoee: 170 apaoas 100 .pa000 160 spoon Porkk'9 _ Denaruf yyaeee: NIA N/A N/A M-Aloop iyaaoo: 6 space 6 ayaow 6 ePaon - ttardtoap :paces: N/A N/x MIA JWrN�r9f Ah~ Property O.elf: Property 0— D Don Verrrwnt Oae S Y.e.rw. ►ro. Glrrtao6lrot � � � � S� 60 _ i' soa6mButhom. VT omw 66 Swffl Street I i II • I , '� south &ettpton. VT 054M F Ij •.• /�--�_ „ w -ram FUTURE F.O.W. AND LQQAnON MAP Wwi: i - an BDEWALX EA89@!FSCALE:1 - 200C w. r -wan w rw -wan awvw:r�iaa � � nv. i•=nsa ../�/ {�iv art ar.. iiaia : sw _ LY I '►, ( �V • _ ��- i 1 t i o � � v d - PARCEL B #85 338 Ut PROPOSED CG110-"� A77ei/, hAs a PROPERTY / \ uE Im PIN OOI1C: MOIRNE)iT s3 aavm SEW ue W r Aw LED E awUWrD EUcM -_ r OAS IAIE m SEVER MANHOLE o STORY MANHOLE ( \ xt 111ORAMi 0MINEAD awme POLE \ �\\\ �\ +,�\\ a s\31 ennhy orrw �� PHv ra r exenny cmw / V� ® ilIllllI) , rod fiF POLE RvwCAYCH 9AN VA LK e �,w\ AV rrwwEDGE OF 6RU9N/%WDS N "" �. �.:.\ `��\\ . •\\�\ \ a a .. a�i k too .� � � r �� � �� • j � \�� ^�' _,4 •- i, dV�` is a i � ` e \fix ~ MAY ® 8 1997 R7 r. \� '1 City of So. Burlington g� S11NFT STET O.U.D. GRAPHIC SCALE ti� O Z, 57, 69 & 85 SWAFT S STREET 7.• a c-t-.; SAV FEVGED AG PER PR0JWNARY COMWNTS OVERALL ER yt g 37E PLAN L rti�.5226 Vw�n�i a a-1—W SAV ADOED FUTURE ROADWAY ( n1 PT:A7) S y i $ $ Dab ChYd Revb$on i inch = 46 n : G 'S^� 4(/ 3� Dram by MJW Data APRIL, 1997 SHEET *"*IIIEvttb`��`� Checked by JP sode = 80' 5k QM.. EMO EERIMO ASS0CjA7M W_ SHELBurdc VERLt014i Approved by SAV Project No. 971Fi EXIST. CB —,� RIM - 182.61 INV IN - 179.69 INV OUT - 179.36 3 EXIST. DMH I RIM = 182.66 - \ NV IN-179.95 I NV OUT = 179.83 1 � 1- b N { II, 6La,IBi GEHACE I S✓ OONNECTION NV - Iel1B I I\ g 1 � Ifirruw A2S Raw. AND enEINA" EABB.BFT 'TAP"m AND VAL ♦/ :/ t arm WWI 1 .� im Off wl�l s /may //,, %4 � �5� ,,. �.�. r1Y/11�!�" ■ '7 P/%� /• , ia � ,'I/j ,5x j.j/ ll I I � I = T 1 91 EXIST. SMH I/ RIM = 197,27 � INV. 8" :192.77 INV. 8 193.77 9 INV. 8"-193.77 1 INV. 8"FM-193.77 BENCIAMAW NAL N PP n I �E cal ► 11 N I I 1 I � u U I I3 „ � r If EXIST. CB k RIM = 200.0 INV. _ I NEW FDA ID" raa /' %a as ra/i riia as ' ora�ra., ria ai//pia a ai a raaaai/,-:o/ii/a a / aaa a •a and y ti �'' _ = •� ';Ply / - - - -- LOCA7M MAP �- acro® oanaKl ��� KKOIOITY ui• I= PIN Cm ra.aert &3W7 Old - r� WMWfT mttx aWK I.W SWEA _ E mow,. WAPIP ro nurse --•� wuKc O allow 1fMfsXl 7q( NWIFF • WVWt WVf-0►MINE •� .IHw. Ti •- u•rr+ac •Oee o....o MAY 0 8 199 / .VWm City of So. Burlington BENC"AAAK ! FF NE CM OF 8H® 20J— MG1EKtSZ`W I I a E�' � P1i0Po®tfoa0l U'yO� Ord M�arxHb / /%� �, a+AK••c rau E Cow in Aff%aAEZl St AM4W I wr � aaroary I fLEJl�VI'i .Mini Sforoge L�,?%ts �F 20-1 I .Sob I Mini Storoge units -- L 1m►n OF tr�F'ia�iefi, / EN q• q� %s sad St Ammnd h ti�eN �O Z = h C I 41 No. 5226 —� , 3 SAY RENSED AS PER PREUNINARY CDWMINTS SAV ADDED SIDEWALK FENCE .. - _ -_- �� ' SAV REAaD GRADING, RET. WAIL, SDEWMX -GRAD s HIC'SC LU" �i F Fe�STERE� �i �► Date Ch'k'd ReVIMOFI A OTC by MJW pate APRIL 1997 Che&ed by JP Soak 1" - 20' 1 Inch - CD tt. SAV 97150 Approved by ProJeot No. Kva t dMY..IWllw Mw• w �paMnlr ..b M .p .A M r• o�r.rr YµY.I w.yirw..r.ry. �,rfv�Y y L 0_b.A. iA sId Q% �r Poo-•s+�/l rr r .s ..r.r� n rr �w.r. r M r ,.b r ti A rarw.r ter. W.rr. t AT V—W •w• rr 0. aMi.M -0 rL WAA . r .rr•rr a b. r r ..•air .A b yr rI� -1 sew R�rwprle. rur wrl. rr.a ` -w wry �s"`.r . "'""'/ ,. 7. M b I.MC b }r M wHMN ►�!/.. erew/b. Wr M..� b mAw. AK Iwo iM. r O.KIi t Y Y�i�IM1�M � jA~ Yr•!{M b a W bbwr. fr eaa w.. Ir a"--* .r.Q. N r-r w- r rat IQ. Iw 0.*.An K 4 *r- .•rr b..+wrr wo r rr � oA rr a N.I. 4 K- .a rq •�. W..,• r s.ra AN 01M•M. ra rnN •.a•1o.1 MN.� sa �•s K r ��Y•yy A r mrara Y K.lj r 1+Ye.+/ ■0•fi1•�!"f >Mr ory .wR b b lr bA/ r ..•aw. Al M r>eT In A.r .rNro IrA .nA M .r..a ... r n.a o w A•r r waw..w► -.MMK M •w •..•.. VL •.ter M Arr r. mrr.... `.... rN�w.ailra �rrr.l'�o- rA.•o' ar.a ►'�-"�"'�°: wr.'"'A.'eA....� .° per. `.�.:.. `+..e.� IM A.jrIr.11 l.f.wri Krt .. �frr W Or Ke.�KW. 0..Wtbv..A b...��,+ �. S A" STRMTR.UA PROPOSM �W�R..Ni/,NG , `1tl WE�i SHEET aVrL E+IMMEMlc ASWI Ate• M i l� SHEL8URNE, VERMONT ST. AMAND AND MORE PROPOSED BOUNDARY AD, "-U SAV REVISED AS PER PREIININARY COMMENTS N� P LM -97 SAV ADDED SLIDE GATE, FENCE a Dote ChWd I Rs+Adon MUTH Ril I NGTON Drawn by MJW Dot! APR�997 Checked by JP SOOIe 1' = 50, CNL EMOD133WO ASSOMM SHELBURW- VE '. �ay� by SAV Project No. 97150 _ I ITN City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 May 9, 1997 Dan Morrissey Wright & Morrissey P.O. Box 421 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Office Building & PUD, 57, 69 & 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Morrissey: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, May 13, 1997 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely,, 12,42- 44/1 J e Weith, City Planner JW/mcp Encls REPORT SWIFT STREET PL1D RESPONSE TO 26,151 SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING REGULATIONS, Al. CAPACITY OF SEWER FACILITIES See correspondence from Civil Engineering Associates. This site is served by municipal sewer. There is capacity from existing uses on site which will be transferred to the new use. Also excess capacity was assign to 60 Farrell St. when it was to be a medical use. This capacity was not changed when the use changed and that excess capacity is now being requested to be applied to 69 Swift Street . Together this provides adequate sewer capacity. A2, FLOODPLAINS The proposed new construction is more than 20 feet above the drainage Swale that runs to the west of this new construction, A3. GROUND AND SURFACE WATER Much of the site drainage utilizes sheet flow over grassed areas to grass swales as a method of cleansing storm flow and slowing it. A4. STATE REGULATIONS This new construction will comply with all State of Vermont regulations. B. WATER AVAILABILITY The proposed new stricture is to be protected by an automatic sprinkler fire protection system. This will be the determining factor for water flow. A!so ? new hydrants are to be installed. There is adequate water flow and pressure to serve these peal: emergency needs. C. SOIL EROSION Erosion control will meet the requirements of State of Vermont Publication #3, D. TRAFFIC IMPACT See tragic report WiEMANN-LAMPHER,E ARCHITECTS * 30 SOUTH PARK DRIVE * COLCIESTER, VT. 05446 E. EDUCATION 1 )ACT This project will not cause any increase in school enrollment. F. MUNICIPAL SERVICES M PACT See attached letter to Capt, McKenzie, G. NATURAL RESOURCES Much of the site is pre-existing fill and totally developed currently. There will be no change in impact on natural resources. H, AESTHETICALLY COMPATIBLE This area of Swift St. is zoned commercial but is obviously in transition. Many of the residential structures have been used for very low conunercial uses such as auto body repair, construction equipment yards, storage facilities etc. This project takes the area to the next step in commercial developments and adds to the Mass A office uses which the Vermont Gas Corporate Offices started and Dan 11lorrissey has continued with projects such as 99 Swift St. I DISTRIBUTION OF OPEN SPACE AND CONFORIITY WITH RECREATION PLAN Open space at the new construction is deliberately maintained it, front of the building to provide a landscaped streetscape. A wide landscaped buffer is being created at the rear of the new construction area to provide residential abutters to the site with a visual separation which does not now exist, The developer has offered to provide an 8' wide asphalt recreation path across the front of his property and across the frontage of the property to the east owned by Couillard. This would allow linkage to Farrell Park, However the recreation COMMittee which sought this would need approval from the Public Works Director who requires a 5' concrete walk J. EFFICIENT LAYOUT AND QUALITY CONSTRUCTION Again the project elevates a previous low level commercial development to class A office space and an integrated credit union, The construction xill be a steel framed, brick clad structure with paved parking. WIEMANIN-LAMPH.ERE ARCHITECTS * 30 SOUTH PARK DRJ�.F, t COLOiESTER, VT. 05446 2 Ii cooPEM110:.YITtlM101YIIrGPftOffilEb This project eliminates one existing curb cut at Swift St, and provides internal access to 85 Swift St. The access is proposed however the developer would prefer to post a bond far its valve with a timeline for construction. It is every ones hope that as Future development is proposed This connecting drive or perhaps drives can be done more efficiently, For the time being security for the Vermont Gas operations center yard must be maintained which dictates the link drive layout L. CONFORMITY OF CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAIN This area is zoned Commercial and the proposed uses are compatible with this zoning. By creating a PUD now which brings two property owners together a vehicle has been created which will allow future Class A development or, a cooperative basis which can be accomplished with fewer curb cuts and controlled access to a street which is envisioned to be a major east west link between Rte 7 and ultimately Rte _A in Williston END OF REPORT WIEMANN�`-LAMPHERE ARCHITECTS* 30 SOUTH ?A tK DRI vZ T COLCHESTER, VT. 05446 3 -N pq*W -XVT- Aq -p-S -y- A -79TF-Tm-jw %Do -mw (q LvaAa LVPVAN PA -M T r; 7,7777 '41077"77, T, DATA PARCEL A #69 DATA PARCEL B #85 Area, Density and Dimensional Requirements: Area, Density and Dimensional Requirements: Requited Pro Required Existing Minknum Lot SIM 40.000 a.f. 96.132 s.f. Minimum Lot Size: 40.000 s.f. 183,000 s.f. 4 Acres (PUD) 2.1 Acres (59 Swift St.) 4 Acre (PUD) 4.2 Acres (85 Swift St) Minimum Lot Frontage: 350 het (PUD) 290 feet Minimum Lot Frontage: 350 feat (PUD) 385 feet Maximum Building Coverogc 30% 29.9% Maximum Building Coverage: 30% 8.8X Maximum Front Yard Coveraga 3OX 30.OX Maximum Front Yard Coverage: 30% 21.6X Maximum Impervious Area: 70% GO.= Maximum Impervious Area 70% 50.2% Minimum Setbacks: Minimum Setbacks - Front: 50 het 50 feet - Frmt: 50 het 50 feet - Front Yard: 15 feet 20 feet - Front Yard: 15 feet 20 feet - S3de: 15 het 5 het - skis: 15 feet 15 feet - Rear. 30 feet 30 feet - Rear. 30 feet 25 feel Parking 9 �� spaces spaces 6 - Gen" Spooss: Handicap Spaces' spaces1 spaParkin- Handicap Sp— n/a n%a Property Owner. Property Owner: Dan Mo ray Vermont Gas Systems. Ina 80 Farrell Street 85 Swift Street South Burlington. VT 05453 South Buriington, VT 05403 .6 El Ifmw I Aft ow \\\\� Lill �� JimIU L. `�IIIII amn _ �Ila hilt Id COMBNM DATA PARCELS A 4 B #89 R 085 ,.. Area, Density and Dimensional Requirements: Proposed • ReWird Minimum Lot SIM 40.000 af. 96.132 sf. I t '769 i y E.,, t I• r r ■-"^ �. t. Total 4 Acres (PUD) AenoL 6.3 Acre � lea - -,' '+,�sl� Number a4 Lots: — 2 '3^ '� I l.'' _ • - Minimum Lot Frontage: 350 feet (PUD) 075 het Maximum Building Coverage: 30X Area: 7OX 16AX ' } I1j I A Ml Q 2 1997 '. :: torwtrorn Maximum Impervious Cornmrdd Office Building ding I tr. ° Type of Land Use: �, O �,, •� G� of So. Burlington (J , f nLLnwldin �' I � r `, SCALE. i ---- 1 Date I Ch'k'd Revision Dray. by MdW Dote APRIL 1997 Checked by jp Scale 1" = 80' Approved by SA'J Project No. 97150 SWIFT STREET P.U.O. 57e 69 do 85 SWIFT STREET OVERALL SITE PLAN SHEEP CIPAL E► GWEERM A4S01MAIM W. %AaBURNE. VERMONT CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON Subdivision Application - PRELJMINARY PLAT 1) 'Name of Applicant l2is-.— t� issc 2) Name of Subdivision 3) Submit Subdivision Fee -O e ! -- 4) Describe Subdivision (,i.e. total acreage, number of lots or units, type of land use, gross floor area for commercial or industrial uses) : 41, ,2oJ IC-,� 5 �� f�lTi'9Gi�v,i i4 f'2,3rn �d� �uaav� 5) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone numbers of owner of record, applicant, or contact person since sketch plan application: 6) Name, address, and phone number of: a. Engineer Z," �4, S b. Surveyor g 7 o v �75 d. Plat Designer 7) Indicate any changes to the subdivision such as number of lots or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the property, etc., since sketch plan application: 1 8) List names and mailing addresses of owners of record of all contiguous properties: /� ..-N G I-? �/ �� • �w /J'Uy�pjcl l vs Gu 64- 914 s e .'- + //7A71,1-_ s.; �04w+hv­2c� Scv i,yl 4 J 9) State title, drawing number, date of original plus any revisions, and designer(s) of the preliminary map(s) accompanying this application: 10) COST ESTIMATES for Planned Unit Developments, multi -family and commercial and industrial complexes: a) Buildings b) Landscaping 3 J. as C12 c) All other site improvements (e.g., curb work 11) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC for Planned Unit Developments, multi- family projects, and commercial and industrial complexes _ (2-way traffic, in plus out) : el'- �� 7/t �tl=�=i� �✓ ;ell A.M. Peak hour P.M. peak our�3`x- Average daily traffic % of trucks 12) Attach FIVE copies and ONE reduced copy (11 x 17) of preliminary map showing the following information: a) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title and the name of the City.. b) Name and address of owner of record, subdivider and designer of Preliminary Plat. c) Number of acres within the proposed subdivision, location of property lines, structures, watercourses, wooded areas, and other essential existing physical features. d) The names of all subdivisions immediately adjacent and the names of owners of record of adjacent acreage. e) The location and size of any existing sewers and water mains, culverts and drains on the property to be subdi- vided. f) Location, names and widths of existing and proposed streets, private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks and other public or privately main- tained open spaces as well as similar facts regarding adjacent property. g) Contour lines at intervals of five feet, based on United States Geological Survey datum of existing grades and also of proposed finished grades where change of exist- ing ground elevation will be five feet or more. h) Complete survey of subdivision tract by a licensed land surveyor. i) Numerical and graphic scale, date and truce north arrow. j) Details of proposed connection with existing water supply or alternative means of providing water supply to the proposed subdivision. k) Details of proposed connection with the existing sani- tary sewage disposal system or adequate provisions for on -site disposal of septic wastes. 1) If on -site sewage disposal system is proposed, location and results of tests to ascertain subsurface soil, rock and ground water conditions, depth to ground water unless pits are dry at depth of five feet; location and results of percolation tests. m) Provisions for collecting and discharging storm drainage in the form of drainage plan. n) Preliminary designs of any bridges or culvert which may be required. o) The location of temporary markers adequate to enable the Commission to locate readily and appraise the basic layout in the field. Unless on existing street intersection is. shown, the distance along a street from one corner of the property to the nearest existing street intersection shall be shown. p) All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved for public use and the conditions of such dedication or reservation. 9 13) Development timetable (including number of phases, and start and completion dates): GGl� 7 (� 7,, , 7 , z,, -�, /,. 7,_ i(��v 14) List the waivers applicant desires from the requirements of these regulations: — G - � � �i�2 �C.-,vim ly�i✓� 15) 1) All existing subdivision, approximate tract lines and acreage of adjacent parcels, together with the names of the records owners of all adjacent parcels of land, namely, those directly abutting or directly across any street adjoining the proposed subdivision. 2) Locations, widths and names of existing, filed or pro- posed streets, curb cuts, easements, building lines and alleys pertaining to the proposed subdivision and to the adjacent properties as designated in paragraph l above. 3) An outline of the platted area together with its street system and an indication of the future probable street system of the remaining portion of the tract, if the Preliminary Plat submitted covers only part of the subdivider's entire holding. ( Sig'hature ) app],�icant or c%ntact person 4 iiRCHIT C�S�ENC!Ni:RS May 5, 1997 Captain McKenzie South Burlington fire Department Municipal Offices Dorset Street So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: 69 Swift Street Dear Captain McKenzie: Thank you for meeting with Dan Morrissey and me on May 1st to discuss the above referenced project. The following is my understanding of the discussion and decisions from that meeting. • The fire hydrants as shown on drawings by Civil Engineering Associates (CEA) are satisfactory. The annunciator panel will be located at either the front or rear entry, whichever is closer to the sprinkler and mechanical room, and a lock box will be installed at that entry for fire department access. • The building will be fully sprinkler protected with a hose connection to meet your department's requirements. • The drives around the building are acceptable as shown on the CEA drawings, except that the 6' wide concrete walk will be extended along the entire front of the building pr widirg 18' of paved surface, including the adjacent 12' wide access drive. ?again, we thank you for your time. Please notify r:e if I have not correctly recorded our meeting. Sincerely, Ven B. W er, A I A DBW/cde 30 South Park Drive Colchester. Vermont 0544c (802)055-5020 ao let-. a ` ola sue. 3— /Rov-�-� ,41 NMI= mra, a I tNN3 r BE" 1K., ��5� •Is� pia sii y � ii pp o a s•• O it • p 0 • i d0 II i m LL i It= '�^ v ) Q 9 } i fi � a j AN fit x 0,111 !1,III ,l a,: al ��# =�D �� pl� r f A f f f A nuns ��uwu �ailSi� k r 11 giDpm i�>,y 0 a L- WLn -- 0 I z 0 v e � IN I � N • - -ter - -- an answe yy nearingrequest wishes. Abundant love• HOME LOANS April 25. 26 & 2 may be ordered iron �' nmelY ortunities & 2-q lied Engineering. Inc gwill enerous opp Dine No credit. Bad credit. Westbrook Com received. the nearing be a loving, sec' Non income Bankruptcy One Maine be convened on or be- ,, await your chili elyn STATE OF Mi mon, Westbrook, fore May 13, 1997. or as ////// Debt consolidation 04092 - Tel. No. (207) 1-888-268-4333. We buy mortgages, soon after that date that lotteries & NOTICE TO 854-8126. General Con- a hearing can be ar- Thank You St. Jude We buy GENERAL tractors, Subcontractors, ranged. for favor granted. njome mprovurance tements and S 1-800 866 WANT CONTRACTORS hers will be is- 9 MGJ III. SCHOOL PROJECTS sued complete sets of Parties entitled to partici- " plans and specifications Lanality pro- P merit (non -re- pate are the municipality 8 LEGAL Contractor sealed P upon pay municipal P Iona ADULT NOTICES posals, in envelopes fundable) of $50.00 plus the 1 ENTERTAINMENT plainly marked: a $20.00 handling charge commission madloi ing partial planning for each set. No P state agencies, adlo' and Chittenden South sets will be Provided. property owners. BEST BACHELOR School District proposal For": arsons granted party PARTIES specifications P p�,ANET ROCK STRUCTURAL Plans and spstatus A FUN SHOW' Invitation to Submit may be examined at the Rule 14(B).pursuant uant to oar Proposals for IMPROVEMENTS & following locations: Call to reserve seating. School District REROOFING OF Group and corporate dis- Transportation MIDDLE/HILLSIDE Dod a ReP Dated in Essex Junction. counts. Open 7 days/wk. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL g ports Vermont, this 17th day of counts. 127 Masn St, AND BROWN SCHOOLS 835 Hanover Street 1997. Barre. 802-479-7 The Chittenden South Manchester, NH 03104 April, School District invites all STRUCTURAL interested, responsible * FANTASY * school transportation IMPROVEMENTS & The Associated General Jennifer von in r Entertainment Inc contractors to submit REROOFING AND Contractors of N.H., Inc. Districtest Street providing PARTIAL MECHANICAL 10 Fort Eddy Road Male & female dancers roposals for P HEATINGIVENTILATION Concord, N.H. 03301 Essex Junction. VT for any occasion. Best P 05452 quality, best price - sails- student for transportation 879-6563 q y School rvicesDistr ces:olCham HIGH SCHOOL BERLIIN. The Dunlap Corp. faction guaranteed.175 Canal Street * 1-800-347-2488 �rR.G. Sullivan Building April 26, 190 plain Valley Union High NEW HAMPSHIR NOTICE OF PUBLIC School, Charlotte Central Manchester, N.H. HARDBODIES School, Hinesburg Ele- grief Job Description: 03101-4401 SALE OF PERSONAL #1 exotic dance Co. mentary School and the asbestos PROPERTY Quality dancers for all Williston School District. Reroofing, The Dunlap No,, events. 1 dancer We are seeking propos abatement, and strut 396 High St eetP Notice is hereby 9 gOLID GOLD DANCERS als for a three year con- final improvTo: Suite 3 that the undersign will StCERS tract to run from July 1, Addressed Somersworth, N.H. sell to satisfy lien y Birthdays, 1997 to June 30, 2000. Mr Bruce MacKay, Su- pg$7g_1496 owner, at public sale by Grams achelor(ette) Closed bidding on May 3. . Contract documents, re- perintendent Construction 1997 at 10:00 AM at Ex - Parties Call 882-1377 Summary of ecifi- Berlin Public Schools tra Space Storage facility ULTIMATE BACHELOR quiremen�a a^be sexam t83 Hillside Avenue nut tree located at 15 Williston Birthday & private cations Y N.H. 03570 734 Rd Williston, The T M Chester, N.H. 0310 Dods VT. Sessions Ih1Sef°tic Chdtenden obtained hrSChool Berlin, 1997 Personal 9 Dance Company 9 Box 161, and be mailed or hand therein by g' VT, NH, NY, ME, MA District, RR#3, or delivered to Ms. Mahon April 25. 26 & 27, the followin 1-800-217-9870 Hinesburg, Vermont, Jeskey, Business Admin- pUBLIC HEARING by contacting Mark N. istrator, on or befor SOUTH BURLINGTON Anne Sharland • * it Bouvier, Business Man- 2,00 p m prevailing tirt)e pLANNING Shayne Newton ULTIMATE agar at (802) 482-3885. May 22 1997 which ill COMMISSION Collin Silk be opened and r ad Armen Dale pRIVATE proposals are to be sub- aloud at 2:00 p.m. a the The South Burlington Scott Smith SESSIONS miffed by May 9, 1997 to. Su erintendents O fice, Planning Commission p public hearing Purchases must b 183 Hillside Avenue Bar- will hold a p • Parties & more! Females Chittenden South n N.H.and at the South Burlington made with ash only an /males, service to yourCity Hall Conference paid for a the time School District deemed valid mus be re - door for VT & NY. Transportation Bid ceived by that tim sale. All it S to be r Room 575 Dorset StrVer- the unit 449-4122 Attn: Mark N. Bouvier, South Burlingt3o^1997 at moved fro urchase. • 800- Business Manager General 'ontrac or pro- mont on May 91 time of sit will ` Employment Opportunities RR#3-Box 161 posals must be accom- 7:30 P.M. to consider the $50.00 de Hinesburg, VT 05461 ponied by a c ified or made and r funded of for 5% following: een broc • INSTRUCTION 9 (802) 482-3885 cashier's Chet unit has reserve of the proposal or a sat- preliminary Plat aPPlica- cleaned. W t or re INSTITUTE isfactory Bid B nil ( tion of Wright and Mor- right to act p '.BROKERS IolPess sealed and clearY in a similar anfou^t2 The planned Pre license real re Lath rissey, Inc. for a p bids. ryl Owner reserve the right unit development co Ve'r_ 26 1 course. Starts 9. TIONeBID All bids must to waive all ormalitles tin of the existing April 19 1997. Cost $199.95. 899- and reject a y NOTIC OF 4084. be received no late, May Proposals or to and mo^t Gas buildivare foot ARING 1:00 pm. (EDT) new 41,125 sq PUBLIC Construction Training 9 1997 at which time all any proposal. Proposals building for general of- VERMON PUBLIC for 16-24 yr. olds. Learn will be publicly shall be sub 'tted upon fice use and a bank with TRANSPO TATIOI construction skills, get a bids d the form provi ed by the drive -through service, 69 AS TION GED, and earn money! opened and read aloud Architect/Engi eer. and 85 Swift Street. Call YouthBuild: No facsimilies will be ac- The Verm nt P'- cepted. Pre -Bid Copies of the application Transportati n Ass • 658-1186 q mandatory held at ublic VPTA) ereby The Chittenden South meeting to b� 13 are available for P tion 11:00 a.m. on ,May inspection at the South notice that, pursue ABSOLUTELY School District reserves 1997 g at the Burlington City Hall. the Federa Trans FREE the right to reject any Middle/Hillside AE\men- A William Burgess minis tratio s l s tang School. tion 18 rants a FREE Chairman, ante P/o9rar" F The selected Ge eras South Burlington opportunity is offer Contractor will be re- planning Commission a public hearing qwired to furnish a 10 propoged capital c WOODEN SKIDS Contract Pe00% Con- April26, 1997 to benefit certain ond and a 1��° of the state certain ttrractt Payment Bond to OF BURLINGTON purchase of the fot cover the execution of CO LIDATED PL equipment and se the work whichwiithll be 0 the ACTION PLAN buses and cor' Contact in conform,ty equipment for A Form of Bonds contained the The City of Burlington is County Transi' in Section 2-C soliciting input on its sources: buses. Bob Peeters At project documents and 1997 Consolidated Plan communication for the contract amount. ment, signage ar Press One -Year Action Plan, Cilit feasibility st The Burlinoaton Free pursuant to 24 CFR Part RCy in the St. Jos The selected Asbestos T l Q AbatementContractor will area: office fu 660-1 vo be required to furnish the 1 802- _ _ _ _ ,.�� General Contractor a City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 April 24, 1997 Dan Morrissey Wright & Morrissey P.O. Box 421 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Office Building & PUD, 57, 69 & 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Morrissey: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans, if appropriate, no later than Friday, May 2, 1997. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincer-ply, Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp cc: Dennis Webster Encls Memorandum - Planning March 11, 1997 agenda items March 7, 1997 Page 10 Sidewalk: There is an existing sidewalk along the property's frontage. 7) WRIGHT & MORRISSEY - OFFICE BUILDING & PUD - SKETCH PLAN This project consists of: 1) constructing a 38,000 square foot 4- story general office building (including a bank with drive -through service), 2) combine two (2) contiguous lots into a planned unit development (69 and 85 Swift Street), and 3) construct a parking area at 57 Swift Street. The lot at 57 Swift Street will be combined into the PUD if a boundary line adjustment can be agreed upon with the owner of 59 Swift Street. A general office building was approved at 69 Swift Street on 4/25/95 (minutes enclosed) but was never constructed. These properties located at 57, 69 and 85 Swift Street lie within the Cl District. They are bounded on the east by the access to Farrell Park, on the north by Swift Street and an auto body repair shop, on the south by Farrell Park and several residences, and on the west by a mini -warehouse complex. Access/circulation: Access is provided by a 36 foot curb cut at 85 Swift Street, a 24 foot curb cut at 69 Swift Street, and a 20 foot curb cut at 57 Swift Street. Applicant is no longer proposing a new access to the rear of 85 Swift Street via the access drive to Farrell Park as shown on the plan. Two (2) internal future access drives are proposed which would connect 69 Swift Street and 85 Swift Street. These internal access drives would be constructed at a later phase of development. Circulation on the site is adequate. Coverage/setbacks: 57 Swift Street: Building coverage is 0% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 59.7% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 29.6% (maximum allowed is 30%). 69 Swift Street: Building coverage is 12.3% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 69.9% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 23% (maximum allowed is 30%). 10 Memorandum - Planning March 11, 1997 agenda items March 7, 1997 Page 11 85 Swift Street: Building coverage is 8.8% (maximum allowed is 30%). Overall coverage is 50.8% (maximum allowed is 70%). Front yard coverage is 28.9% (maximum allowed is 30%). Coverage information should be provided for the entire PUD. Setback requirements are met. Parking: The proposed office building requires a total of 158 spaces and 149 spaces (21 of these spaces are located at 57 Swift Street) are being provided including five (5) handicapped spaces. This is a 9 space or 5.7% shortfall. Applicant should be prepared to justify this shortfall. A bike rack should be provided as required under Section 26.253(b) of the zoning regulations. There should be a five ( 5 ) foot buffer strip between the parking area and the westerly boundary line. The parking standards require that each drive -up window have sufficient stacking room for six (6) cars and that a by-pass lane be provided. Staff is concerned that the proposed stacking lanes will block parked cars and access aisles. The sketch plan shows that the parking area at 85 Swift Street will be expanded. This expansion is no longer proposed. Landscaping: The preliminary plat should include a landscape plan showing all existing and proposed landscaping. Traffic: The preliminary plat submittal should include a traffic impact study addressing the impact on the Shelburne Road/Swift Street and Farrell Street/Swift Street intersections. Building height: The applicant is proposing a 49.25 foot height for the office building and seeking a wavier from the Commission. The preliminary plat submittal should include building elevations for all four (4) sides of the proposed building. Applicant should be prepared to address the criteria under Section 25.113(c) of the zoning regulations. Sewer: The preliminary plat submittal should include the sewer allocation request. The applicant should be aware that there is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. Allocation granted will be placed on a waiting list until such time as allocation is available. 11 Memorandum - Planning March 11, 1997 agenda items March 7, 1997 Page 12 P.U.D. report: The preliminary plat submittal should include a report addressing the PUD criteria under Section 26.151 of the zoning regulations. Sidewalk: A sidewalk should be constructed along the project's zronzage. Recreation path: The Recreation Path Committee reviewed these plans and submitted comments (see enclosed). Lighting: The preliminary plat submittal should include existing and proposed exterior lighting details and locations. Dumpster: The type of screening proposed for the dumpster should be noted on the plan. Other: --- the preliminary plat application should be signed by all property owners involved with this PUD. --- the applicant should dedicate to the City an eight (8) foot strip of land along the property's frontage for future street widening. --- the preliminary plat plan should show the existing zoning boundaries including the C.O. District along the drainageway. --- the applicants will be required to record a legal document which makes it clear that this is a PUD and all involved lots will be considered to be part of the PUD for zoning and subdivision purposes. 12 Memorandum - Planning March 11, 1997 agenda items March 7, 1997 Page 12 P.U.D. report: The preliminary plat submittal should include a report addressing the PUD criteria under Section 26.151 of the zoning regulations. Sidewalk: A sidewalk should be constructed along the project's frontage. Recreation path: The Recreation Path Committee reviewed these plans and submitted comments (see enclosed). Lighting: The preliminary plat submittal should include existing and proposed exterior lighting details and locations. Dumpster: The type of screening proposed for the dumpster should be noted on the plan. Other: --- the preliminary plat application should be signed by all property owners involved with this PUD. --- the applicant should dedicate to the City an eight (8) foot strip of land along the property's frontage for future street widening. --- the preliminary plat plan should show the existing zoning boundaries including the C.O. District along the drainageway. --- the applicants will be required to record a legal document which makes it clear that this is a PUD and all involved lots will be considered to be part of the PUD for zoning and subdivision purposes. 12 MEMORANDUM To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: May 13, 1997 Agenda Items Date: April 24, 1997 STEPHENS - MORRISSEY & ST . AMAND LAND SWAP- - SWIFT STREET The boundary line adjustment plan prepared by Krebs & Lansing dated 4 / 11 / 97 is acceptable. 57, 69 & 85 SWIFT STREET PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - SWIFT STREET 1. The brook across parcel B (VT Gas property) flows northerly not southerly as plan shows. 2. The existing structure being removed is connected to the Swift Street sewer main. This should be located and if possible used to serve the new building instead of opening Swift Street. HOWARD JOHNSON'S - DORSET STREET - WILLISTON ROAD 1. Water and sewer mains and services should be shown on the plans. They may have to be increased in size which will require excavation work on Dorset Street. 2. The Dorset Street island at Williston Road intersection should be shown on the plan. 3. Site drainage system may require a retention basin. ACQUATEC, INC.- GREEN MOUNTAIN DRIVE Plan should have a north arrow, lot dimensions, utilities (water and sewers) . JOHN LARKIN - BARLETT PROPERTY - LAND SWAP I do not have a problem with this landswap. The plan dated 4/18/97 pre - Krebs & Lansing is acceptable. M E M O R A N D U M To: Joe Weith, South Burlington City Planner From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: Plans Reviewed for May 13, 1997 Date: April 24, 1997 1. Stephens/Morrissey/St. Amand Dated 4/15/97 Boundary Line Adjustment Swift Street Acceptable 2. City of South Burlington/John Larkin Dated 4/18/97 Boundary Line Adjustment Shelburne Road Acceptable 3. John Larkin Dated 4/8/97 Williston Road/Dorset Street Three (3) additional hydrants are requested in locations shown on the plan. These hydrants should be connected to a looped water system between U-Mall and Dorset Street on the 12 inch main. 4. Dan Morrissey Swift Street PUD Dated 4/11/98 Swift Street 18 feet of access is requested along the north and east sides of the building. 5. Wiemann-Lamphere Dated 4/22/97 75 Green Mountain Drive Acceptable STITZEL, PAGE & FLEMIER, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 171 BATTERY STREET P.O. BOX 1507 BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05402-1507 (802) 660-2555 (VOICE/TDD) STEVEN F. STITZEL FAX (802) 660-2552 PATTI R- PAGE' E-MAM. FIRM2555 a(�� AOL.COM) ROBERT E.FLETCHER JOSEPH S. MCLEAN TIMOTHY M. EUSTACE ('ALSO ADMITTED IN N.Y.) April 23, 1997 Lewis K. Sussman, Esq. Pierson, Wadhams, Quinn & Yates 253 South Union Street Burlington, VT 05401-4531 OF COUNSEL ARTHUR W. CERNOSIA, Re: Notice of Conditions of Planned Unit Development Approval Dear Lewis: Enclosed please find our standard form of Notice of Conditions of Planned Unit Development Approval. If you should have any questions, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, Timothy M. Eustace THE/dah cc: Ray Belair SON3258.COR 4 NOTICE OF CONDITIONS OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL WHEREAS, its principal place of business in business in , a Vermont corporation with , Vermont, and , a Vermont corporation with its principal place of , Vermont, (hereinafter collectively "Owners"), are the owners of certain property known as " " consisting of two units in one building located on 2.4 acres of land, more or less, located southerly of and westerly of in the City of and WHEREAS, Owners obtained approval from the South Burlington Planning Commission for a commercial planned unit development consisting of Lots A, B and C as shown on a plan entitled "1 Timber Lane" dated October, 1992, as revised February 24, 1993, prepared by Civil Engineering Associates, Inc., and to be recorded in Map Book at page of the City of South Burlington Land Records ("Property" herein) by a Resolution of the Planning Commission approved at a meeting on August 24, 1993; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission's approval imposes certain conditions on the subject property; NOW THEREFORE, Owner hereby gives notice that the Property is subject to the following conditions and restrictions which shall run with and be binding upon the land unless or until modified or removed by the South Burlington Planning Commission or its successor: - 1 - A ui �A 1. The Property shall be developed and used in accordance with the terms and conditions of the approval of the South Burlington Planning Commission granted on August 24, 1993. 2. The Property is and shall constitute a single parcel of land for purposes of compliance with City of South Burlington regulations and ordinances now in effect or hereafter amended or adopted, including zoning and subdivision regulations. Owners covenant and agree that for purpose of compliance with and application of City of South Burlington ordinances and regulations, including zoning and subdivision regulations, the property shall continue to be regarded as a single parcel of land, even if the buildings located on such property are conveyed to separate owners together with the lots on which such buildings are located. 3. The proper party for purposes of submitting applications for approval from time to time under City ordinances and regulations, including zoning and subdivision regulations, shall be all of the owners or an association as designated by all of the owners in a document duly executed and recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records. The City shall act upon any applications submitted by all of the owners or the association and shall not be required to resolve a dispute between the association and the owners as to the respective rights of the association and owners. It shall be the duty of the owners or the association to notify all others having an - 2 - interest in the property that may be effected by the application proceedings of the commencement of such proceedings. 4. Any action to enforce any City ordinance or regulation, including zoning or subdivision regulations, against the Property, or activities or events occurring on the Property, shall be brought against the owners or the association. It shall be the duty of the owners or the association to notify all others having an interest in the property that may be effected by the enforcement proceedings of the commencement of such proceedings. Any decision in an enforcement proceeding, including a decision granting injunctive relief or penalties, shall be enforceable at the City's sole discretion against the owners, the association or the owner of any building within the property. 5. This Notice of Conditions shall be recorded in the City of South Burlington Land Records and shall be referred to in any deed conveying the Property or an interest in the Property. 6. This Notice of Conditions shall be binding upon the owners and the owners' successors and assigns. Dated at 1993. Vermont, this day of August, - 3 - By: Duly authorized agent By: Duly authorized agent STATE OF VERMONT ) : SS. COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN) At on this day of , 1993, , duly authorized agent for personally appeared, and they acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of Before me, Notary Public STATE OF VERMONT ) : SS. COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN) At on this day of , 1993, , duly authorized agent for personally appeared, and they acknowledged this instrument by him sealed and subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed of FORM0286.REA Before me, Notary Public - 4 - 1711-711- -,� elt �. -I,-- �� - DATA PARCEL. A /89 DATA PARCEL 8 #8 Area, DwmNy and Dimensional Requirements Area Density and Dimensional Requirements: . ReWired Proposed eked Exf ting Minimum Lot Size. 40.0D0 s.f. 96,132 wf. Minimum Lot Size: 40.000 w1. 183,000 s.f. 4 Acre* (PUD) 2.1 Acres (69 Swift St.) 4 Acres (POD) 4.2 Acrw (85 SwM St) Minimum Lot Frontages 350 feet (PUD) 290 feet Minimum Lot Frontage: 350 teef (Niel) 385 feet Maximum Building Coverage: 3OX 29.9% Maximum Building Coverage: 30X &8% Maximum Front Yard Courage: 30X 30.OX Maximum Front Yard Coverrge: 30% 21.6X Maximum Impervious Arms¢ 70% 69.9% Maximum Impervious Area: 70% %2X Minimum Setbacks Minimum Setbacks: — Front: 50 feet 50 feet — Front: 50 feet 50 feet — Frant Yard: 15 feet 20 feet — Front Yard: 15 feet 20 feet — Side: 15 feet 5 feet — Sldw 15 feet 15 feet — Rear. 30 feet 30 feet — Rear. 30 feet 25 feet Parking Spacer Parking Spaces: Spac 170 spaces 159 spaces Spaces: n/o n/a — Handicap Spaces: 6 spaces 6 spaces — Handicap Spaoew n/a n/a Property Owner: Property Owner. Dan Morrsssey Vermont Dam Systems, Inc. 60 Farrell Street 85 Swift Street South But,ington. VT 05453 South Burlington, VT 05403 J ILE j �MM 1 I PARCEL \A i MR7M Alit" ft""SW MGM I COMBINED DATA PARCELS A & 8 /89 & f55 Area. Density and Dimenelanal Requirements: RaWk,ed ProposedI I I a •• �('.� �IMinimum Lot Size: 40.000 s.f. Total Acreogw 4 Acres (PUD) MAW s.f. 6.3 Acres J 1 s � -E w , WEI Ij D 1 A 6.Hr EL ✓ Number of Lots: - 2 i,.. Minimum Lot Frontage. 350 feet (PUD) 675 feet „i'� ,._-..-.., Maximum Building Coverage: 30% Maximum Front Yard Coverage 3OX WAX 24.5X i! ' l p (-1 n ( ', ''� 7 APR R 6 ., a ,. SITE LOCATION Maximum Impervious Area 70% 57.0% I T j Type of Land Usw Commercial Oftlw Building I �u .. % City of So. Bol fdri,gruiCome0w O AWRY LOCAnON MAP SCALE 1 _ PARCEL B #85 IDxlkthg Porklry 1 V10 /F/I P�*ftrSI-W\ I AV SWIFT STREET P.U.D. 57, 69 do 85 SWIFT STREET OVERALL SITE PLAN Diu. by MJY! Date APRIL 1997 SHEET Checked by j_ Scale 1- = 8V aK ENG0030W ASsoaA7M W. SHE BURNE. VERMONT Approved by SAV Pro}ect No. 97150 (TN PLANNING COMMISSION 25 April 1995 page 4 three years to assure that the landscaping takes root and has a good chance of surviving. 4. For the purpose of calculating required road impact fees under the South Burlington Impact Fee Ordinance, the Planning Commission estimates that the proposed office building will jenerate 68.7 additional vehicle trip ends during the P.M. peak hour. 5. A sewer allocation of 1170 gpd is approved. The applicant shall pay the per gallon fee prior to issuance of a zoning permit. 6. All new exterior lighting shall consist of downcasting shielded fixtures so as not to cast light beyond the property line. Any change in lighting shall be approved by the City Planner prior to installation. Details of the building mounted lights shall be submitted to the City Planner for approval prior to permit issuance. 7. As expressly represented by the applicant, the applicant shall dedicate to the City an eight foot strip of land along the property's frontage for future street widening. The legal doc- uments (i.e, irrevocable offer of dedication) shall be approved by the City Attorney and recorded in the land records prior to issuance of the zoning permit. 8. The plan shall be revised prior to issuance of a zoning permit to show a drainage easement along the proposed drainage pipe on 85 Swift Street (existing Vermont Gas property). 9. The applicant shall obtain a zoning permit for the building within six months or this approval is null and void. 10. The applicant shall obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/ Compliance from the Administrative Officer prior to occupancy of the building. 11. Any change to the site plan shall require approval by the South Burlington Planning Commission. Mr. Crow seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 6. Site plan application of South Burlington School District to construct a 640 sq. ft. boiler room addition to South Burlington High School, 550 Dorset Street: Supt. Chattman said the school is being converted from electric to gas heat with oil backup. The space is needed to accommodate boilers. There is still adequate space to access the back of the PLANNING COMMISSION 25 APRIL 1995 PAGE 3 to complete its application. Mr. Austin moved to continue the final plat application of National Gardening until 9 May. Mr. Crow seconded. Motion passed unanimously. 5. Site plan application of Vermont Gas Systems to construct a 3- story, 32,124 sq. ft. general office building and razing a existing office building and accessory structure, 63 and 69 Swift Street: Mr. Webster located the building on the south side of Swift St. just west of the intersection with Swift St, adjacent to the existing gas company building. The current building will be removed and a new 3-story structure built. Mr. Webster said they are still convinced that entering at the high side of the building is right for visibility. Mr. Burgess noted that comments have been gotten from the Rec Path Committee that because of topography, the city shouldn't go after an easement on this site. Mr. Austin noted that Councilman Cimonetti had felt it would be good to access at the current point of access. Mr. Austin said he had been on the site and he didn't think that was feasible and didn't recommend changing from what the applicant proposes. Mr. Austin moved the Planning Commission approve the site plan application of Vermont Gas Systems to construct a 3-story, 32,124 sq. ft. general office building and raze an existing office building and accessory structure, 63 and 69 Swift St, as depicted on a two page set of plans, page one entitled "Layout and Util- ities, Vermont Gas Systems, Inc, 69 Swift Street, South Burlington, Vermont," prepared by Wiemann-Lamphere, Architects, Inc, dated 3/28/95, with the following stipulations: 1. All previous approvals and stipulations which are not super- seded by this approval shall remain in effect. 2. The applicant shall construct the sidewalk along the property's frontage in a location approved by the City Engineer. This sidewalk shall be constructed prior to occupancy of the building. Prior to issuance of a zoning permit, the applicant shall post a bond for the sidewalk in an amount approved by the City Engineer. This sidewalk shall be constructed to the spec- ifications approved by the Public Works Director. 3. The applicant shall post a $24,500 landscape bond prior to issuance of a zoning permit. The bond shall remain in effect for 4 lee '.mo S Co (vW J J' - - City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 April 1, 1997 Dan Morrissey Wright & Morrissey P.O. Box 421 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Office Building & PUD, 57, 69 & 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Morrissey: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is a copy of the March 11, 1997 Planning Commission meeting minutes. If you have any qu5Joeeith' s, please give me a call. el , ylanner JW/mcp 1 Encl cc: Dennis Webster 3-26-1997 11:06AM FRC,i CIV— 1ENG. ASSOC. 18029SS2271 1m CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P. U• Sox 485 (802) 985-2323 SHELBURNE, VERMONT 05482 Fax No. (802) 985-2271 ew,uPs a. amIA" Pr•s:d"t March 25, 1997 afe""` � vro. rr..ro"OCK f • �e�rt.CwROi PVNti�N Tnoswer Mr. Daniel Morrissey Wright & Morrissey 60 Farrell Street - Suite 401 So. Burlington, Vermont 05403 Re: Proposed Swift Street Office Building Sewer Flow Requirements Dear Dan: As you have requested., Y have summarized below the design sewer requirements for your proposed office building to be located off Swift Street in South Burlington. I have also included a suTnmary of sewer flows for the 60 Farrell Street project (National Gardening) which indicates that there is a significant amount of unused capacity. proposed office building design sewer flows: Building Size = 41,000 SF Calculated Employment: 41,000 SF/(250 SF/Person) = 164 Employees Design Sewer Requirements: 164 Employees x 15 Gallons/Person 2,460 gpd Credit for Low Flow Fixtures (10%) - 246 gpd TOTAL REQUIREMENT 2,214 gpd Capacity presently allocated to this property: One 3-Bedroom House + One 5-Bedroom House = 8 Bedrooms Design Flow = (8 Bedrooms x 150 Gallons/Day) - 10% = 1,080 gpd At this time it appears that you need an additional 1,134 gallons per day of sewer capacity to meet your design flow requirements. Unused capacity at 60 Farrell Street: Building A (not built) Sewer Allocation = 750 gpd Building B - An allocation of 3,850 gpd was granted for a combined medical office building/general office building. 'Phis allocation request was not reduced when the medical office component was eliminated. Design Flows Allocated to Project = 3,850 gpd rn inicc nctrtu rnrt6LfYrMr • rcenn+r �. 1 MAR-26-97 WED 10:10 AM 18029852271 . 3-26-1997 1 1: 07AM FROM C I V— 1 ENG. ASSOC. 18029852271 P. 2 Mr. Daniel Morrissey Page 2 March 25, 1997 Design Employment: 41,000 SF/250 ent: son = 164 Employ= + 6.79o' Growth = 175 Employees General office Building Design Flows (175 Employees x 15 gpd) - 10°10 = 2,362 gpd Infiltration: 415' of 6" Diameter Pipe = 150 gpd Deli with 3 Employees = 195 gpd Unused Capacity = 1,143 gpd In summary, the design sewer flows for your proposed office building can: be met by using the sewer flows presently allocated to this property combined with the unused capacity of your 60 Farrell Street project. If you should have any questions or need any additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, a Stephen A. Vock, P.E. SAV:pao IAAR-26-97 WED 10:10 AM 18029852271 R. 2 ,�t ,,rdtJ N _ •giro 6�•l .,.�..,�:,� � �.x. /XiGNb �7ro,u "' mwri .�a mrn�n 1, { •Occ b II-t u uoi?u!ljng V ;o Am ax�4 aVl IJ4)'Li DOOItJi y�Yleb lVsd — - - c ° ��/ A i u a+�nwa�w [L'ss I 7trx haw ,1I 91 � k'000�1 iQZ Q�3 �Yi G/i I{1PJ1%� : 277' M0VWn'"GMC m wra ww wroc a L661 Z l ��� ��a�4� �a�-�I,t�w1o1 A ,I'q�•r�� .t'i��wuv1�1 Qai 'd�o�la ��G� ��ot G;�,l� "'� � ® 'I JNI '51721J1OIb °3M2NdNM - NM1W71M al�Q9b� y6'4z �IA�1NseblaajaU �raz'Z jt4l J�01rJntJGzl J'aal��l 19'6e CIAO Irl�d �»�zlrAJ.� t 1,° Y{sJ111 v 19 k LS g'4 a01'41 10.4 w axm'vNUo+A J v4i0,,oi y4vi 7iA?� J-v o G►'� �✓ 1 ( �� Yat a�� dal a��ll ka et►v ow 107 - - }�✓J a Nor �lt� EL�lei 4 y -%' �Ii� �1 �aianx� uw •on i rwj-�bewlQ AL4V A., )�w �rrir►�rs i~ rJ�sda�rvra fir+ r -Vr �I � �.ri /r� at I I •r � •� � / �I�-A�YW •�/r1 � I � I � • 01 — _ jr • I 1 -II •Y •¢ • IW City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 March 7, 1997 Dan Morrissey Wright & Morrissey P.O. Box 421 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Office Building & PUD, 57,69 & 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Morrissey: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed is the agenda for next Tuesday's Planning Commission meeting and my comments to the Planning Commission. Comments from City Engineer Bill Szymanski and the Fire Department were sent to you at an earlier date. Please be sure someone is present on Tuesday, March 11, 1997 at 7:30 P.M. to represent your request. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, oe Weith, City Planner JW/mcp Encls City of South Burlington 575 DORSET STREET SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05403 FAX 658-4748 PLANNER 658-7955 February 20, 1997 Dan Morrissey Wright & Morrissey P.O. Box 421 Burlington, Vermont 05402 Re: Office Building & PUD, 57, 69 & 85 Swift Street Dear Mr. Morrissey: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 658-7958 Enclosed are preliminary comments on the above referenced project from City Engineer Bill Szymanski, the Fire Department and myself. Please respond to these comments with additional information and/or revised plans no later than Friday, February 28, 1997. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Raymond J. Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant RJB/mcp cc: Dennis Webster Wiemann - Lamphere Architects, Inc. FAX LETTER Date: To: Fax Number: Re: Message: I r� From: Fax: 30 South Park Drive, Colchester, Vermont 05446 (802) 655-5020 Preliminary Comments - Planning March 11, 1997 agenda February 20, 1997 Page 2 WRIGHT & MORRISSEY - OFFICE BUILDING - SKETCH PLAN Sketch plan should be revised to include the following additional information: --- names and addresses of owners of record and applicant. --- type of, location and size of existing utilities. --- existing zoning boundaries including C.O. District along drainageway. Other comments: --- provide coverage information for the PUD as a whole. --- provide justification for parking shortfall. --- the property at 57 Swift Street must be contiguous with the other two (2) properties to be a part of the PUD. Preliminary Dlat: --- the preliminary plat plans should conform to all information requirements of Section 203.1 of the subdivision regulations and Section 26.10 of the zoning regulations. --- application should be signed by all owners involved with this PUD. --- provide building elevations for all four (4) sides of the proposed building. --- provide sewer allocation request, there is currently no sewer allocation available at the Bartlett Bay Wastewater Treatment Facility. Allocation granted will be placed on a waiting list until such time as allocation is available. -'L submit a report addressing the PUD criteria under Section 26.151 of the zoning regulations. --- approval to use the Farrell Park access road to access this PUD must be obtained from the City Council. --- submit a traffic impact analysis. M E M O R A N D U M To: Bruce O'Neill# Recreation Director From: Ray Belair, Zoning and Planning Assistant Re: Swift Street PUD Date: February 24, 1997 The Planning Commission on 3/11/97 will review a proposal to combine 57, 69 and 85 Swift Street into a planned unit development (PUD) and construct a 40,000 square foot office building at 69 Swift Street. This PUD lies adjacent to Farrell Park. The Recreation Path Committee may want to review the plan for this project (see enclosed). M E M O R A N D U M To: South Burlington Planning Commission From: William J. Szymanski, South Burlington City Engineer Re: March 11, 1997 Agenda Items Date: February 20, 1997 LOT 7, GREEN TREE PARK - GREEN TREE DRIVE 1. Water shut off valve to building shall be within public r.o.w. Plans shows it within the lot. It should be moved or a easement given to the City around it. 2. Drainage pipe material should be plastic or concrete not metal as plan shows. LATTER DAY SAINTS CHURCH - SWIFT STREET Site plan prepared by David Luce architect dated 1/10/97 is acceptable. 57, 69 & 85 SWIFT STREET - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT The parking lot east of the new building should have an inlet to intercept the storm water from it and the new building otherwise it all drains toward the property to the east. The building and the parking lot will increase the storm water runoff considerably. M E M O R A N D U M To: Joe Weith, South Burlington City Planner From: South Burlington Fire Department Re: Plans Reviewed for March 11, 1997 Date: February 20, 1997 1. Church of Jesus Christ Dated 2/10/97 of Latter Day Saints 400 Swift Street Acceptable 2. Swift Street P.U.D. Dated 2/12/97 57, 69 & 85 Swift Street --- all driveways must be 20 feet wide, hard surfaces. -- 20 foot access between parking spaces south side of building. --- poor access east and north side of building. --- sprinkled building with Storts 4" Fire Department connection, Fire Department connections in stairwells, 2 }" stand pipes reduced to 11" I.P. 3. Green Tree Park, Inc. Dated 1/29/97 6 Green Tree Drive --- water flow on dead end line. --- Fire Department connections. Wiemann -Lamphere Architects, Inc. FAX LETTER, Date: '%) " �11 1 To: I Fax Number: Re: Lam' Message: IFi From: "A'1110,1c, Fax: (802) 655-6567 30 South Park Drive, Colchester, Vermont 05446 (802) 655-5020 From: "A'1110,1c, Fax: (802) 655-6567 30 South Park Drive, Colchester, Vermont 05446 (802) 655-5020