Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutVR-86-0000 - Supplemental - 0040 Sunset Avenue (2)SOUTH BUR LINGTON 'ZONING f3OAI-4 D OF ADJ US`I u�X Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property Is located; 0 (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; 11 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; 13, (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 0 (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. a Date Appellant Vote: Yes List findings below: 1. L,f_ o + --s Too (1Grro r -b /1 'uI c o n S2�Y� reties MM Appeal # `�� 1 I Js Sign _ 2. �CJ�oit� �// nod cal /- SS�7 ! chcver f�/ a� ize tj46 -"/ c✓- `w�c w l! �YJ%n �, 'L Q li�P1�i �i ons c �►G� i., Q 04`s. nat SOUTH I3URLINGTON 'ZONING BOAi:D OF ADJUST;:MNT Findings in accordance with Section 446E of.the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the pariticular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; [A (3) That such unnecessary hardship has notbeen created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (;j— (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. �— Appeal # 3 Da t e Appellant Vote: Yes No p 1 3 SOUTH I3URLINGTON ZONING BOA?D OF ADJUST�:4;I T Findings In accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and U (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan.' Dates Appellant ./ ! J ' crAC 1 Vote: Yes Q No List findings below: v 2• [l N V L ^ V Appeal # 1 Sign IT-C, . ; & cxTz-j T,4li� ina A. SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOAPD OF ADJUSTM;'-N'r Findings in accordance with Section 446P of -the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the pariticular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; jr-1-- (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; [ UUjam (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; 0 (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and fa (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Q Date "�- 'Ls-' Z l oc- Appellant 'p 2'z� rC'e �r Vote: Yes V�J"- No List findings below: l . ,il/e �iiOdo� i • a Appeal # Sign 7- 76 %✓✓ �/%v,/r` o� e�eT�r• nT 3. / i,I Tr .. vi ! %a 4a. / W SOUTH I3URLINGTON "ZONING BOAT?D OF ADJUST;^, ANT Findings In accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; El (2) That because of such physical -circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; U (3) That such unnecessary hardship has notbeencreated by the appellant; H (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and 1:1 ( j) That the variance, if authorized, will re —present the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date.�� Appellant-r�.��.r-v L , Vote: Yes Q No Appeal # � � � j % Cp',1 Sign -,� SOUTH BURLINGTON 'ZONING HOARD OF ADJUSTX; -IN`1' Findings in accordance with Section 446P of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topographical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; Eo (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; R (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; TT (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential' character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; and (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Date Appellant �1/ acc Vote: Yes Q No List findings below: V�— 2. 3• Appeal -,..�._ �1-c� �K cZGc cat �/ o -,"