The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutVR-89-0000 - Supplemental - 0030 Sunset Avenue (2)ti()I 'I'll IS( iw, I Nt;.I'I IN /,( IN I NI; Ii( ),\IA, I 1 )1, ,\ I , . I I',,,I'?i i• N,i f I rid i rigs 1 rt 1tt•,•()I'd itIII' ,' t I c,n ill;ii l t,It P I nnrr I r,) I)(•vtr I o)III t•n I A 1 (I) I'h;at. thcrtr rart- un I (lift. phys i era 1 c i rcuIII s tafIces or c onci i t, i <>ns; , incIudifig irregularit.}•, narrowness, or slhrtI lowness of• lot : r zc or shal-te, or' except i onal topograh ical or other phys i ca l conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that. tle unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, rand not. the circumstances or coedit.ions generally created by t.hc provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2); That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the r-e.a-sonable use of the property; AS�(e 1�� v,� . ✓�' +. (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (,)-a PxtS�,, u (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to t_he public welfare; ykla t t ro l( oT u 191 -, re"v-e la- � e (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modificationf � s_sible of the zoning regiiInt.ions and o the plan. /�SS'*Iv Y1-'7, i�1t Appeal Da t(' �Yr 4? - - - -- . - - A()pr I l an t b w -t � CvC� /Y` tcnr�. T 4 ,a - Vottr: Y I L"f, No L S I gri Use Reverse side for additional findings S-('I'll 111jI"I,INI;'i',r' /.crNIN(; Ilcr,\1"1) r)I. ,\I,.II!"-I-`]1.'�I- F t ncl ► ngs t o nr r ccr-cllsnc r w t Lh :;r•r t t rrrr 1.11;}i nt t hr I' I nnrr r rrl A Devcrlupmc•n1 A(!( l I) That, t-hercr +t►c unique physical rc•unc;t.s,nr_c:s <,r' c:ondit.ions, inc:ludifig irregiiIarit.v, narrowness, or shrtI lut,rjt�s, of lot size or shape, or ezceptionr►1 topogrr►hical or other physi<:nl condi t. ions pecul irir• to the particular property, and thtst the unncrc=c'ssa r'y IIa rdsh i p is due to suc}t conditions , r,n(I not. t_he circumstances or cundit.ions generally created t) the provisions uf- the Zoning regulations in the neigiorhood or district in which the property is locr,ted; (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore neces ar �t,o ena le the reasonable use f the property; ions J Lt1 ' (3) That such unnecessary ards jp has not b"en cr ted by the appellant; ,, v (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the p blic w 1#are; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief' and will represent the least modification possible -of the zoni regulations and of the plan. Appeal 4 App(�I lant Vote: es I No i g r i Use Reverse side for additional findings tiol-'I'll lit ii I, 1 Nt;ToN '/,()N 1 Nt; 11"Alilr trl• Al)-JU�S*l'`II•:NT Findings in ith Soc•t ion 1.168 of the I'Irrnrrrr } h DOVe1opment. Act 11) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, inr_ludinK irregcllarity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or* other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (Z) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; ic2 (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; w ► 1-4 (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; 6LLi fZ -S 7-N t u-e:7 v t 1 a z C4-& wL() S % (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of* the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal 1)a to -- Appellant Vote: Yes T i No I_:- :) Sign C. �!�-a Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnecessary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circumstances or conditions generally created by the Provisions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood or district in which the property is located; (2) That because 'of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the property; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appellant; (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represent the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modification possible of the zoning regulations and of the plan. Appeal - Date 08 $ Appellant Vote: Yes �, � �+ No = Sign Use Reverse side for additional findings SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Findings in accordance with Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act (1) That there are unique physical circumstances or conditions, including irregularity, narrowness, or shallowness of lot size or shape, or exceptional topograhical or other physical conditions peculiar to the particular property, and that the unnece:nary hardship is due to such conditions, and not the circ stances or conditions generally created by the pro isions of the zoning regulations in the neighborhood di/11trict in which the property is located; V �AetT5 or (2) That because of such physical circumstances or conditions, there is no possibility that the property can be developed in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regula •ons and that the authorization of a variance is they ore necessary to enable the reasonable use of the pro erty; (3) That such unnecessary hardship has not been created by the appe ant; — ----- - V (4) That the variance, if authorized, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, nor be detrimental to the public welfare; --��/V �%- (5) That the variance f authorized, will represent the minimum variance that ill afford relief and will represent the least modi cation possible of the zoning regulations and of the pla . Appeal # Date V -- � Appellant �I C Vote: Yes _� No = Sign Vt Use Reverse side for additional findings, cWI'll II"I.INIJIN'I; Itcr,AI(Ir I' t rld I rig!, I n n r'cl+rrr %•, I I.Ir :ir•r t t in ! •II >{ l t h I' I Iinli I rir 1 II '"•i- I ui>n11•rI t A( l (2) (3) ( 4 ) 1'11.I t, the re nr+r un I clue phys i c:1, 1 c: I r'c,only t,Inec-�: O I- c•e,nd I I. I un,, , inc:ludIII g i r'r egulari ty, fill rrowness, or shill lownes" of lot sIzc or' shai>c, or exceptional topogr'rlhical or oth+rr- I,hysic:+tl cond1 t.ions pecul i+Ir to the particular property, itnd that the unnecess;Ir}' hrt rdsh i p i s due to such cond i t i ons , rend not the ci rcmils t.,rlcoS or coed i t.ions 9enerril I created 1,}• the pro�'isiorls of Lhcr zoning regulations in the ne191 )orhood or district in which the property is located; 4 hat because of such ph sical bircumstanc there is no possibility that the propertyecanorbeodeveloped in strict conformity with the provisions of the zoning regulations and that the authorization of a variance is therefore necessary to enable th re so ble u_ he property; --� That such appellant; unnecessary hardship has not been created by the That the variance, if authorized, will not a4Vlter tfie essential character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor substantially or permanently impair the appropriate use or development of adjacent Pro ert y, nor be ode t;,.a� t,,kp publ i9,,�'we4fare; A (5) That the variance, if authorized, will represerlft the minimum variance that will afford relief and will represent the least modifican }PossibJ,e of th'ng.,_regulat.ions and of the plan. Appeal Date �� Appr-J last. Vote : Yes No Use Reverse side for- addi tional 1 Sign findings