Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0088 Central AvenueJ �►W •001 southburlington PLANNING & ZONING November 19, 2015 Re: #CU-15-05 — 88 Central Avenue Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sinc ely r AJ. Bela Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7015 0640 0007 8199 3334 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com I U sout11budH" 1 t Gil ?f_ANNtNG & ZONING Permit # I d cJ (office use only) CONDITIONAL USE / VARIANCE / MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Type of application (check one): (4Request for a conditional use ( ) Request for a variance ( ) Other 1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailmi address, phone & fax #): 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) S C JA hC6 V013 r . 3) APPLICANTAname, mailing address, phone, fax #) Vo S 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name, mailing address, phone & fax #, if different from above): S CL44� Iz a. Contact e-mail address: 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburi.com 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: © C - V`\- r \V . Q t7" & 6) TAX PARCEL ID #: (D '3�0 , (3 a a S-& 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): Cie " i—M C civ)1'es 0 1"', . b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each use): c. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and a sting uses to remain): y� 4- d. Total building square footage on property(proposed buildings & existing building to remain): e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement &mezzanine):_ -' 11 1�18 t L&,� [OeLD�' f. Number of residential Units (if applicable, new units & existing units to remain): v - g. Number of employees co any vehicles (existing & proposed, note office vs. non -office employees): h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if overlay districts are applicable): 2 Conditional Use /Variance /Miscellaneous Application Form, Rev. 12-2011 8) LOT COVERAGE a. Total parcel size: a�S_S_ Sq. Ft. b. Buildings: Existing _ Proposed rj l Sq. Ft / Sq. Ft. c. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside st rage, etc) Existing % / f Sq. Ft. Proposed % / 1`5 Sq. Ft. V o�. Ji�,- ( I d. Front yard impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing �,' % Sq. Ft. Proposed !k"I c , % / _V Sq. Ft. e. Total area to be disturbed during construction: S _ Sq. Ft. * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ a U 0 0, 00 b. Landscaping $ ( UO c. Other site improvements.(please list with cost): cE C� c,,,,- Ckq,-,�c 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC: a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATIONs� 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE �Q" 14) PLANS AND FEE Plans shall be submitted which shows the information required by the City's Land Development Regulations. Five 'a) regular size copies, one reduced copy (11" x 17"), and one digital (PDF-format) copy of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision application fee shall be paid to the City at the time 14WZVI v,,( Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of knowledge. r� SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT Iha, -Rec OF PROPERTY OWNER PRINT NAME Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this application and find it to be: ff COMPLETE ❑ Incomplete The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Conditional Use/Variance/Miscellaneous Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 CEDAR COURT I yry; ^' m.. y.Y+� I' I { Y`' C, ]olles/Beck A;Sf. Residence U uwz2 is EW LDT PUIL PII.1G COVE RA6e= 1469 5F. +,/ ` INPERV OUL 5L RFACE5= 402 5F. IWVRVIGLJS' RFACE5 10 LllDUJ�I PF-CK=461 S.F. +/- TGT4L LET CGVER44E=1930 S.F. +i- = 675. d� LOT C0VERE 4-�,f3Y Ri LDII.Y, GI.L`(= 527. pil"EETTLTLE I Site r1 pSchematicF- PLAA1Note: Drawings on this page reference survey I completed 3/21/2014 by Button Professional Land Surveyors. See record drawing attached —D H— 6OALE 16 HALF THAT NOTED IF F TM QJ 12`—' 6HEET5 ray From: Nina Beck <wingtao@myfairpoint.net> Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 11:43 AM To: ray Subject: Fwd: 88 central ave Attachments: 08.21.15 site schematic.pdf; ATT00001.htm Hi, Here is our plan all including also the steps and walkway in front of the steps to the apt. I don't know why they were omitted from this plan but they were on the original approved plans for the addition. We have balanced these covered areas with widening the existing flower beds and wrapping them farther around the front of the house on Central Ave. Matt says he checked and updated the numbers. I will have this printed as soon as I hear from you that this looks fine. Thanks, Nina Beck for Dobra Tea and Wingtao LLC Nina Beck for Dobra Tea and Wingtao LLC Hillview Design Collaborative hillviewdesian.com Matt Dyer Designer/Draftsman 802.434.2225 (0) 802.316.0204 (C) Z Hillview Design Collaborative hillviewdesign.com Matt Dyer Designer/Draftsman 802.434.2225 (0) 802.316.0204 (C) Hillview Design Collaborative hillviewdesi ng com Matt Dyer Designer/Draftsman 802.434.2225 (0) 802.316.0204 (C) <08.21.15 site schematic.pdf> Hillview Design Collaborative hillviewdesign.com Matt Dyer Designer/Draftsman 802.434.2225 (0) 802.316.0204 (C) Hillview Design Collaborative hillviewdesi ng com Matt Dyer Designer/Draftsman 802.434.2225 (0) 802.316.0204 (C) Z-d'I' 2 ?�ro ctl'7 7 -� 6 l--,� s -� r tneOther Paper • otherpap --- ------ ----- ----- .... ----- - ....... ...-- - -- -- -------------- ..... --- --- ---- ---- ---- -- ---- --- Ictic l UBUCHEAMG SOUTH BURLtNGTON DEVELOPNIMM REVIEW BOARD The South.Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing in the South Burling- ton City Hall Conference Roam., 57.5 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday August 18, 2015 at 7:061.P.M. to consider the following: 1. Conditional use application #Ctf-15-05 of Nina Beck & Stacy Jolles for after -the -fact approval to construct a 56 sq, ft. deck to a non-conforr amg single family dwelling structure, 88 Central Avenue. 2. Conditional use application #CU-15-06 of Robert & Marilyn Maddison for approval to construct a 300 sq. ft. one-story addition to a non -conforming single fancily dwelling structure, 7 Lyons Avenue. 3. Conditional use application #CU-15-07 of Paul & Nancy Godard for approval to construct a 6' X 18, roof to cover deck which will encroach six (6)'feet into the front setback, 8 Duchess Avenue, Tim Barritt, Chair South Burlington Development Review Board A copy of the applications is available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. Par- ticipation in the local proceeding is a prerequisite to the right to take any subsequent appeal. July 23;,2015 KidSafe CONTINUED FROM PACE 1 � lissa has volunteered at the event ever since she was a little girl! KidSafe is hoping that once again generous neighbors and friends will donate high quality saleable items for the event. A cadre of volunteers, including families, corporate teams, and teens will be on hand to organize the donations and ensure the sale is a junk -free event' offering both quantity and quality. KidSafe is looking for do- nations of household essentials, children's "clothing, books, vintage and collectible items, garden and outdoor items, tools, furniture and much more! Proceeds for the Community Yard Sale support the KidSafe Collab- orative in its efforts to prevent and address child abuse and neglect in Chittenden County. Donations maybe dropped off: Tuesday August 4, 3-7 p.m.; Wednesday and Thursday, August 5 & 6, 8 a.m.-7 p.m.; Friday, August 7, 8-10 a.m. only. Champlain Valley Exposition, Rte. 15, Essex Junction Donations are tax-deductible. All .&_..M-PI0VMe.Rt Shelburne Museum Store Sales Associates Needed Are you friendly, customer services oriented, and looking for a unique retail opportunity? Shelburne Museum is hiring motivated sales staff to interface with our visitors in our busy store. Visit www.shelburnemuseum.org for job descriptions and application instructions. Shelburne, Vermont www.shelburnemuseum.org Snow Pt The Board of S South Burlin( requests sealer on or before tl, aSnow F Thursday, Augu Mandatory Si - ,July 30, 2 For informatior contact the 550 Dorset Street, A SOUTH BURLIN( Heal Girls So Frederick H. Applicant must haN Previous experience middle school stude to work collaboral All candidates are SchoolSpring.con information you wil cover letter; resui Please South Burl Attn 5 4nnth Bi I 08/18/2015 frbrn South Burlington Land Deyelopment Regulations. Adicle #3 (Exceptions to Setback i Lot Coverage Roguiremegjs for Lots Existing Prior to February 28. 197C (5) For lots that are less than five thousand (5,000) square feet in size, lot coverage may exceed the maximum allowed for the district up to a maximum of forty percent (40%) for buildings and 60% for total lot coverage. From the 88 Central Ave. Zoning Improvements List Filed With the City of South Burlington Total lot coverage reduced from 1968 s.f. To 1930 s.f, 69% to 67%. Total building coverage reduced from 1501 s.f. To 1477 s.f, 53% to 52% Propose that the current overall lot/building coverage is actually more than f.ADwEa • Deck 56.00 sq.ft • Woodshed. 46.97 sq.ft with an additional 23"overhang • Steps and landing to Accessory Unit. 11.28 sq.ft Total of added structures 114.25 sq.ft Current permitted lot coverage. 1930.00 sq.ft Current Total Lot Coverage 2044.24 sq.ft. (Total lot size; 2858.00 sq.ft) Impervious surfaces reduced from 467s.f. To 424s.f. Propose that this figure has increased due to additional paving V5 S C— �--. o er -� ,, -. �v �, _ ra F., .. .. � :�, .. � �� -.... ., �' Grp �`.++' _ . ,. m � ,.� c- - �. 'w� . _ t r ,� �� - �' . ,� a �: ti R w .- ,� .. . , .., �. o �. ,.. �.. ; r. �1.. � s'r °i i .. .... `n� ,,. � .. � yp� h 4a' ... J P. any '��^..a � �y F .� � �' - •� `. .o m r:., �e s' ram,,, • 4 rl U � tr o ����Rnbt�� .� s S �. �ci � � a � rJ (-�`E V) P, R. C-1 F �C�gSC1C��j G$C..C�C k'" https://mail-attachment.googleusercontent.com/attachmenYu/0/s/?view=a...ORhiBHbdSI MNeyOd-Kk-cY6xTuvoBs8w3lQpxUogdOSHN7opAsgbENR 8/13/15, 5:42 PM Page 1 of 1 i I 1 , 1 �x 2 .aen nr L elwm auoc s=4-WE 'El . au ar N p7�° W -- 8 -- -- �� --�� N1.•OxWW 15.60' CEDAR STREET �, � naa• " mtotm C z ---t� -- 'J I ,aeon. 88 CENTRAL L nl AVENUE W � u srN,cnwr mJ 6700 ��------ 5 �4530Y E amen of building H 1 — z ...N I r ar m� — — N l/° (M'W pain, ae A I I 1 1 notes in and blue by Hiliview Design 05/20/15 THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURWY IS 70 DEPICT THE EXIS7WG BUR-UNG LOCATIONS FOR COMPARISON OF SETBACK DIMENSIONS AND TO DEPICT PROPOSED LUPRO"ENTS BASED ON ASSOCIATED PLANS PREPARED BY HILLWEW DE51GN COLLABORAR4E SAID PLANS SHALL BE CONSULTED FOR ANY DESIGN / ARCHITECTURAL RELATED INFORMAAON. THIS PLAN SHALL NOT BE USED IN THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY OR PROPERTY RIGHTS ``III11/I xx°ao oxen O sxoawrr r roe M o a PLAN SHOWING PROPOSED ADDITION A,• n..m-aS,°m �v.vwr. aW .r a,x, o-enmm a.a re..v,.,.m �LEONARD'•.�� Iaysnp _JOLL6 1 BECK 1z a S tx rwra4.M. 0 Pa (�Sx/1b1 o�ustl x IM m Y". a/ paugvY ': Button nasr. ris..n., pan N I.sM RA pxr�n v I.«o°�ruis �' •m� �•w+-�..n w w,..,e .mwe. m. � e i N. n � °""'", Prafewional a xe ren r nr narpsex ff 6vvrres w pxatxPry rxwrs `. No. 695 axma. GRAPHIC SCALE f wan . fo fees "" '':p'.........'��: m � pr, —f i7 ,. �• RESIDENCE 1 of 1 1•=1a I 0n.rrw.� BBCBi1RALA9F�QDl'HIQIYPA�,SONA8670dNCfON,VERNOM peDbN>' 0.115 0.Wmma, Viosm �rov0.Ns� ";;M CONTAt hOGEL VIEW MopeL VIEW 4 SGLliH F1EVATIpJ urr rovxe u�r-row�.e 3 LIOR"TH EIEVATIOAI .IIaIER iO��.a/eYdf RagtlenGa 9aM fl.Ainpt.n, vrmrlt �swvaevmox�w v...,:... _. _ SHEET MILE Deck Plan and MOPFL VIEW I— Elevations AS EIEVATIOIJ — Z ' PECKPLAU sxEET xLwaea__ DRAFT COPY w ^tea, ,� m ,uo w,ro,lx cwm,mzn io a x A1.00 ,aea,o �mvb �,e:wnxa,a•,wmo, ro�<o�am,w'w.ffi. PROGRESS PRINT NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION"`Ama •ertawu acuF a uu.v TunT xareo ro o au i�`xie` auE'ETa CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this Z O day of , 201y, a copy of the foregoing public notice for ,�, n�r�' (Jscf [type of applicati n] [application number], was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: (full names and addresses) s Dated at [town/city], Vermont, this 70 day of , 20_L5-. Printed Name: tiJ =GEC A-"MAJ v • 11Ps Phone number and email: - q - 69 9 Signature: Date: - Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form. Rev. 1-2012 r southburfiugto. PLANNING & ZONING May 1, 2015 Stacy Jolles 88 Central Avenue So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Possible Zoning Violation — Deck without Zoning Permit Dear Ms. Jolles: It has come to my attention that you are in the process of constructing a deck at the southeast corner of your addition. A review of the plans approved by the Development Review Board indicates that this deck was not shown on those plans and therefore it was not approved. Unless you are able to show that this deck was approved and a permit issued, you will need to apply to the DRB for after - the -fact approval for this deck. Please contact me at your earliest convenience to discuss this issue. Sincer , RNC yvmond. Administrative Officer 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com ,. 4.r_0'l southburlington PLANNING & ZONING May 13, 2014 Re: #CU-14-02 Dear Applicant: Enclosed, please find a copy of the Findings of Fact and Decision rendered by the Development Review Board concerning your recent application. Please note the conditions of approval including that a zoning permit must be obtained within six (6) mnnfhc If you have any questions, please contact me. Sinc ely Yaymond J. Belair Administrative Officer Encl. CERTIFIED MAIL -Return Receipt Requested # 7010 0290 0000 2215 6102 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com f�--4 kv ',,Fr 0A r 'IF O MIA southburfington PLANNING & ZONING '�'I(,i4 117-rs Permit #- - G� o ficc use my) CONDITIONAL USE / VARIANCE / MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD All information requested on this application must be completed in full. Failure to provide the requested information either on this application form or on the site plan will result in your application being rejected and a delay in the review before the Development Review Board. I understand the presentation procedures required by State Law (Section 4468 of the Planning & Development Act). Also that hearings are held twice a month. That a legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing. I agree to pay a hearing fee which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Type of application (check one): 7) Request for a conditional use Request for a variance Other 1) OWNER(S) OF RECORD (Name(s) as shown on deed, mailing address, phone & fax #): Antonia Stacy Jolles and Nina Rachel Beck as Trustees of the Antonia Stacy Jolles and Nina Rachel Beck Revocable Trust, created by Trust Agreement dated 11/7/2006 2) LOCATION OF LAST RECORDED DEED (book & page #) Trustee Deed in Trust 1 /31 /14: Book TBD, Page TBD Prior Deeds: Book 392, page 383 and Book 1041, page 164 3) APPLICANT (name, mailing address, phone, fax #) Hillview Design Collaborative LLP Mark Bromley AIA 4) CONTACT PERSON (person who will receive staff correspondence. Include name, mailing address, phone & fax #, if different from above): Stacy Jolles 88 Central Ave., S.Burlington VT 802-355-0841 a. Contact e-mail address: wingtao@myfairpoint.net 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com r r 5) PROJECT STREET ADDRESS: 88 Central Ave. 6) TAX PARCEL ID #: 0330-00088 (88 Central) and 0310-00003 (3 Cedar Court) 7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. General Project Description (describe what you are proposing): _ Renovation and addition to single family dwelling (88 Central Ave. to include accessory residential unit. /1 WZ 7A : � 1,p14 Demolition of existing single family dwelling (3 Cedar Court) I b. Existing Uses on Property (including description and size of each separate use): Two single family dwellings: 88 Central: Building coverage of 883 SF M19 S97 Sr 7YfAL. 3 Cedar Court: Building coverage of 618 SF c. Proposed Uses on Property (include description and size of each new use and existing uses to remain): Renovation and addition to yield Building coverage of 1477 SF to include accessory use. Gross area of completed structure: 2901 SF with accessory use occupying Approx. 431 SF of that total (15%) d. Total building square footage on property (proposed buildings & existing building to remain): Total gross area (both levels) = 2901 SF. Building coverage = 1477 SF e. Height of building & number of floors (proposed buildings and existing buildings to remain, specify if basement & mezzanine): Height of building Approx. 22 ft. Basement, First and Second Floor f. Number of residential Units (if applicable, new units & existing units to remain): One plus one accessory residential unit inclusive g. Number of employees & company vehicles (existing & proposed, note office vs. non -office employees): N/A h. Other (list any other information pertinent to this application not specifically requested above, please note if overlay districts are applicable): Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 8) LOT COVERAGE a. Total parcel size b. Buildings: P0:1c1: Existing 53 Proposed 52 Sq. Ft. _% / 1501 % / 1477 Sq. Ft Sq. Ft. c. Overall impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 69 % / 1968 Sq. Ft. Proposed 67 % / 1901 Sq. Ft. d. Front yard impervious coverage (building, parking, outside storage, etc) Existing 16 % / 467 Sq. Ft. Proposed 15 % / 424 Sq. Ft. e. Total area to be disturbed during construction: 768 Sq. Ft. * * Projects disturbing more than one-half acre of land must follow the City's specifications for erosion control in Article 16 of the Land Development Regulations. Projects disturbing more than one acre require a permit from the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation. 9) COST ESTIMATES a. Building (including interior renovations): $ $300,000.00 b. Landscaping $ 2500.00 c. Other site improvements (please list with cost): 10) ESTIMATED TRAFFIC: a. P.M. Peak hour for entire property (in and out): 11) PEAK HOURS OF OPERATION 12) PEAK DAYS OF OPERATION 13) ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE 12/1 /14 14) PLANS AND FEE Plans shall be submitted which shows the information require Regulations. Five (5) regular size copies, one reduced copy ( copy of the plans must be submitted. A subdivision applicatil �/V� 3 � Conditional Use / � ent I F-format) n 1 at the time Rev. 12-2011 of submitting the application. See the City fee schedule for details. NOTE: NOTIFICATION of ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS: Notification of adjoining property owners, in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations, is the responsibility of the applicant. After deeming an application complete, the Administrative Officer will provide the applicant with a draft meeting agendas or public hearing notice and sample certificate of service. The sworn certificate of service shall be returned to the City prior to the start of any public hearing. I hereby certify that all the information requested as part of this application has been submitted and is accurate to the best of my knowledge. /9 SIGNATURE OF APPLICA T aJ, A -vTv ti, A JUc-C.0 5 SIGNATURE OF IWOPERTY OWNER Do not write below this line DATE OF SUBMISSION: I have reviewed this application and find it to be: [,-COMPLETE ❑ Incomplete —/I /.I/ C inistrati e Officer PRINT NAME The applicant or permittee retains the obligation to identify, apply for, and obtain relevant state permits for this project. Call (802) 879-5676 to speak with the regional Permit Specialist. Conditional Use / Variance / Miscellaneous Application Form. Rev. 12-2011 r 04 southburlington PLANNING & ZONING Legal Review Invoice May 12, 2014 Stacy Jolles & Nina Beck 88 Central Avenue So. Burlington, VT 05403 Re: Legal Review - #CU-14-02 Pursuant to the requirement to have required legal documents reviewed by the City Attorney and as required by the "Planning and Zoning Fee Schedule" adopted by the South Burlington City Council on April 20, 2011 (as amended), please remit the following amount to be used to pay for the Legal Review: Amount requested: $ 150.00 No Legal Review shall be authorized by the City without receipt of these funds. The City shall hold these funds and use them only to pay for the required Legal Review. If at any time the amount being held is reduced to $0, the City shall request an additional amount sufficient to cover estimated costs from the applicant prior to authorizing any further expenditures of the Legal Review. Following the completion of the legal review, any unused funds shall be returned to the applicant. Further, the applicant retains, at all times, the right to request any unused funds be returned. Upon receipt of any such request, in writing, the city shall inform the City Attorney of this request and require that they cease any further work. Following the payment of any work done to date, the city shall return unused funds and inform the City Council that the legal review has been ceased at the request of the applicant. Checks should be made out to the City of South Burlington Please remit payments to: Raymond Belair Administrative Officer City of South Burlington 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 tel 802.846.4106 fax 802.846.4101 www.sburl.com No Text C 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLING TON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING f:\users\planning & zoning\development review board\staff comments\2014\cu 14 02 88centralavenue hillviewdesigncollaborative.do( PROJECT DESCRIPTION Conditional use application #CU-14-02 of Hillview Design Collaborative, LLP to: 1) demolish the single family dwelling at 3 Cedar Court, 2) construct a 1,201 sq. ft. addition to the existing 1,700 sq. ft. single family dwelling at 88 Central Avenue, 3) create a 431 sq. ft. accessory residential unit in the expanded home, and 4) merge the two (2) lots at 88 Central Avenue & 3 Cedar Court. COMMENTS Administrative Officer Ray Belair and Planner Temporary Assignment Lee Krohn, AICP have reviewed the plans submitted on January 31, 2014, and offer the following comments. This application includes two existing homes on two adjoining but individual lots. The application proposes to remove one existing home, expand the remaining home, and create a one -bedroom accessory apartment within that expanded home. The two lots would be merged. Total building coverage decreases from 1501 sq ft to 1477 sq ft, and total lot coverage decreases from 1968 sq ft to 1930 sq ft. Being a corner lot, the combined property has two front yards and two side yards. The existing home to remain at 88 Central Avenue has a front yard setback of less than five feet, but is not changing in any way and will remain 'as is'. The side yard setback on the southerly side is at least five feet (except for existing steps) and thus conforms. The side yard setback on the easterly side is at least 8 feet deep, and thus conforms. The front yard setback along Cedar Court is the only one that requires a waiver, as the LDRs require a ten foot setback here. The existing home to remain sits as close as 5.1 feet to the property line, although removing the steps that are less than two feet from the line will improve upon existing conditions. The other home to be removed sits as close as 5.3 feet from the property line, although the front wall of the expansion will be longer, and will be 5.2 feet from the line (and another set of steps sitting less than one foot from the boundary will be removed). The Board is authorized to grant a waiver to within 5 feet of the front property line, so the proposed addition is at least theoretically permissible. This project is subject to review under the LDRs covering the Queen City Park zoning district (which itself also requires review under Section 3.11, nonconformities), Section 3.10 accessory residential units, Section 3.06(J), setback waiver, Section 13, parking, and Section 14.10 conditional uses. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements: QCP Zoning District Required Existing Proposed w► Min. Lot Size 7500 S.F. 2858 sq. ft. 2858 sq. ft. *Max. Building Coverage 40% 53% 52% *Max. Overall Coverage 60% 69% 67% Min. Front Setback -addition* 10 ft. 5.3 ft. 5.2 ft. Min. Side Setback - addition** 5 ft. 1.1 ft. and 1.5 ft. 5.8 ft. and 8.0 ft. Min. Rear Setback 10 ft. N/A N/A. Max. Building Height 25 ft. 22 ft. 22 ft. 4 Zoning compliance r CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING f:\users\olanning & zoning\develoom ent review board\staff comments\2014\cu 14 02 88centralavenue hillviewdesigncollaborative do( * A slight improvement is being made in building coverage and total coverage. Total lot size remains the same. * Front setbacks of existing house of 4.4 feet and 5.1 feet are not changing; house being removed is set back 5.3 feet today, and the replacement addition would be set back at least 5.2 feet. A waiver is required. ** The 5.6 feet side yard setback for the existing house conforms and remains. Side yard setbacks for the replacement addition are 5.8 feet and 8.0 feet, and thus conform, where the existing home to be removed does not. 4.08 QUEEN CITY PARK DISTRICT QCP F. Nonconforming Structures. Structures in the Queen City Park District shall be subject to the provisions of Article 3, Section 3.11, nonconformities, and to the following requirements and restrictions: (1) Any nonconforming structure may be altered provided such work does not: (a) Exceed in aggregate cost thirty-five percent (35%) for residential properties and twenty-five percent (25%) for nonresidential properties of the fair market value as determined by the City Assessor or by a separate independent appraisal approved by the Administrative Officer; or (b) Involve an increase to the structure's height or footprint, or otherwise involve an increase to the square footage of the building or structure. (2) The Development Review Board may approve any alteration which exceeds the thirty-five and twenty-five percent rule described above or which involves an increase to the structure's height, footprint or square footage subject to the provisions of Article 14, Conditional Use Review. (3) The Development Review Board shall determine that the proposed alteration or expansion will not adversely affect: (a) Views of adjoining and/or nearby properties; The building addition will essentially replace a single family dwelling which is located in the same vicinity as the addition, therefore this criteria will be met as the before and after impact on views will be similar or not worse. (b) Access to sunlight of adjoining and/or nearby properties; and The building addition will essentially replace a single family dwelling which is located in the same vicinity as the addition, therefore this criteria will be met as the before and after impact on sunlight will be similar or not worse. (c) Adequate on -site parking. The two (2) properties currently have a total of two (2) parking spaces and will have the same two (2) spaces after development, therefore no adverse effect is created. 1. See discussion below regarding parking. C 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING husers\planning & zoning\development review board\staff comments\2014\cu 14 02 88centralavenue hillviewdesigncollaborative.doc G. Additional Standards. (1) Development, construction, and alterations within the QCP District within one hundred (100) linear feet of the center line of Potash Brook shall be subject to the requirements of the Potash Brook Overlay District. (2) Multi family dwellings shall be subject to site plan review, as per Article 14, and shall be limited to a maximum of four (4) dwelling units per structure. The distance of this lot to Potash Brook is approximately 240 feet This is not a multi family dwelling. 3.10 E. Accessory Residential Units. One (1) accessory residential unit constructed within or attached to a primary single-family dwelling or within an existing, permitted accessory structure shall be a permitted single family use, in accordance with the following criteria: (1) Floor space of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the total habitable area of the single-family dwelling unit. According to the application, there is 2900 sq. ft. of total habitable area, and the accessory residential unit will be 427 sq. ft., or 15% of the total habitable area. This is well under the 30% limit. (2) The principal dwelling shall be owner -occupied. No information provided; sworn testimony should be sought on this matter. (3) The accessory dwelling unit shall be an efficiency or one -bedroom unit. The proposed accessory residential unit is a one -bedroom unit. (4) Adequate wastewater capacity is available to service the accessory unit, as demonstrated by issuance of a Wastewater Allocation or on -site wastewater permit pursuant to the South Burlington Ordinance Regulating the use of Public and Private Sanitary Sewerage and Stormwater Systems. This should be satisfied, especially given the removal of an existing single family home and its replacement with an accessory residential unit. There is no net change in the number of bedrooms (currently there is a two 2-bedroom homes; as proposed there will be a 3-bedroom home and a 1- bedroom accessory residential unit). (5) Two (2) additional off-street parking spaces shall be provided on the same lot, either in a garage or in a driveway, and not in any areas required to meet coverage limitations, or any front yard area other than a driveway, required by these Regulations. There is an internal conflict within the LDRs. This section requires two parking spaces for the accessory dwelling, yet Table 13-1: Parking Requirements, Residential Uses, requires only one parking space for an accessory residential unit. The more restrictive requirement applies, but is not satisfied, as no additional parking spaces are proposed. Applicant requests that the two (2) additional parking spaces required for the accessory residential unit be located in the community's common parking area. Applicant states that one of the existing homes already uses the neighborhood common parking area. Approving that continued use in this legal forum may be reasonable, but also raises possible C 1 CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING f:\users\planning & zoning\development review board\staff comments\2014\cu 14 02 88centralavenue hillviewdesigncollaborative.ft ramifications. How far away is that common parking area, and is it practical for an occupant to actually use? Who owns that common parking area, and is permission required of that party or those parties to continue that use? Even absent any concerns over that today, what happens when other landowners propose to also count that common parking for their private needs? As you will see below, Section 13.01(D) (1) allows the DRB to consider approving such off site parking, but there are both practical and legal complications with doing so. Following that section of the bylaw is a suggested, alternate approach. D. Off -Site Parking. (1) Required parking and loading spaces shall normally be provided upon the same lot as the use or structure to which they are accessory. However, there may be occasions where off -site parking is beneficial, whether off -site parking is combined with parking requirements for other uses or parcels, or just for one particular use. Parking could be provided off -site in combination with parking for other uses that are the same (e.g. several retail establishments could combine parking) or that are different. If the uses are the same, the parking requirement shall be determined by adding the parking space needs as per Tables 13-1 through 13-6. If the uses are different, a shared parking calculation shall be undertaken as per Section 13.01(E). A cleaner approach would be to acknowledge and accept going forward the nonconforming conditions that exist today (only two (2) on -site parking spaces serving these two separate homes exist at present, and two on -site parking spaces serving the newly -expanded home and accessory residential unit would exist upon approval). Although there is a change in physical form of the building, there is a lessening of land use density, changing from two separate, primary residential dwelling units to one primary residential dwelling unit with one accessory residential unit. For the record, there is now a letter in the file, written and emailed on April 4, 2014, stating: To Whom It May Concern, The Prudential Committee of Queen City Park has reviewed Stacy Jolles and Nina Beck building project at 3 Cedar Court and understand it will not add any new parking spaces to that property. We have agreed to continued (sic) to let residents of that property use our overflow lot as they have done for the last fifty years. Bill Orleans President, QCP Prudential Committee Although it remains unknown how many parking spaces are available in that common lot, there is now clear permission to use them by the owners, if the DRB finds this appropriate and approvable. The applicant provided information on the distance from the subject property to the common paring area which is 486 feet. 2. The Board should discuss the off -site parking for the accessory residential unit and weather it meets the LDRs. (6) If occupancy of the unit is to be restricted in the deed of the single-family home to a disabled person, no additional off-street parking is required. No such restriction is proposed. A zoning permit shall be required for each accessory residential unit. Required. C CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING f\usersWanning & zoning\development review board\staff comments\2014\cu 14 02 88centralavenue hillviewdesigncollaborative.doc Conditional Use Review by the Development Review Board pursuant to Article 14, Section 14.10 shall be required if the establishment of the accessory residential unit involves the construction of a new accessory structure, an increase in the height or floor area of the existing single-family dwelling or existing accessory structure, or an increase in the dimensions of the off-street parking areas (i.e. garages and driveway areas) presently existing on the site. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 14.10(E) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed conditional use shall meet the following standards: 1. The proposed use, in its location and operation, shall be consistent with the planned character of the area as defined by the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. The proposed addition is consistent with the planned character of the area, as defined by the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use shall conform to the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed use is located. According to Section 4.08(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the QCP Zoning District is formed in order to encourage residential use at densities and setbacks that are compatible with the existing character of the Queen City Park neighborhood. It is designed to promote the area's historic development pattern of smaller lots and reduced setbacks. This district also encourages the conversion of seasonal homes to year round residences. There are currently two separate, homes; as proposed there will be one principal home and one accessory residential unit within one structure. This proposed use conforms with the purposes of the district. 3. The Development Review Board must find that the proposed uses will not adversely affect the following: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. There is no reason to believe that this will adversely affect the capacity of municipal services. (b) The planned character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses. High density residential is consistent with the planned character of the area, as defined by the Comprehensive Plan. Density is not increased. (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. There is no reason to believe that this will adversely affect traffic in the vicinity. Density is not increased. (d) Bylaws in effect. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING f:\users\planning & zoning\development review board\staff comments\2014\cu 14 02 88centralavenue hillviewdesigncollaborative.doc Except where the DRB has discretionary authority noted above, the property is in compliance with the bylaws in effect, or is existing nonconforming. The survey and more detailed site plans and accompanying information provide most of what is needed by the Board in this case. The required setback waiver is addressed above and below. Parking is addressed above. Absent a site visit or other information, questions may remain about possible adverse effects upon views or solar access for adjoining properties. The Board should carefully consider testimony from any neighbors as to any impact associated with this criteria. (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. Addressed in (d) above. SETBACK WAIVER Section 3.06 (J) (1), (3) & (4) of the SBLDR states that: (1) Side and Rear Setbacks. A structure may encroach into the required side or rear setback up to a distance equal to 50% of the side or rear setback requirement of the district, but in no event shall a structure have a side setback of less than five (5) feet. The side yard setback requirement is being met by the new addition and being a corner lot, there is no rear yard. (3) Additional Encroachment Subject to DRB Approval. Encroachment of a structure into a required setback beyond the limitations set forth in (1) and (2) above may be approved by the Development Review Board subject to the provisions of Article 14, Conditional Uses, but in no event shall a structure be less than three (3) feet from a side or rear property line or less than five (5) feet from a front property line. In addition, the Development Review Board shall determine that the proposed encroachment will not have an undue adverse affect on: (a) views of adjoining and/or nearby properties; (b) access to sunlight of adjoining and/or nearby properties; (c) adequate on -site parking; and (d) safety of adjoining and/or nearby property. The front yard setback for the proposed addition does not meet the normal ten (10) foot setback requirement, but does meet the minimum five (5) foot requirement of this section. The front wall of the addition, while longer than that of the house to be removed, is consistent in location with that existing front wall, and with the front wall of the main house to be retained. Parking has been addressed; views and solar access are noted above; and no evidence has yet been submitted suggesting that this application poses a safety problem. (4) Processing of a Request. Any request under subsections (1) - (3) above to expand an existing structure, or place a new structure, to within less than ten (10) feet of any property line shall include the submission of survey data prepared by a licensed surveyor showing the location of affected property lines, existing and/or proposed structures, and any other information deemed necessary by the Administrative Officer. A survey prepared by Button Professional Land Surveyors, PC, dated 3/19/2014 and stamped by a CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 8 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING husersWanning & zonina\development review board\staff comments\2014\cu 14 02 88centralavenue hillviewdesiancollaborative.ft Vermont -registered land surveyor, has been submitted in order to clarify the issues described above, and to satisfy this requirement. LOT MERGER Although not technically an issue to which any regulatory standards apply under the LDRs, it is wise to advise the applicant that appropriate legal documents (amended deeds, lot merger agreement, etc) must still be created and recorded in the land records in order to effectuate the actual merger of these two separate lots. Any approval of this application should require that proof of recording be provided to the Administrative Officer at an appropriate time in the sequence of permit proceedings. RECOMMENDATION Provided that the Board finds the issues described above to be satisfied under the LDRs, and if no new information comes to light suggesting adverse impacts upon adjoining properties, then the case may be closed. Respe Ily submitted, Ray and J. Belair, Administrative Officer No Text r r CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 2 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING f:\users\planning & zoning\development review board\staff comments\working folder staff comments\cu 14 02 SScentralavenue h IME PROJECT DESCRIPTION Conditional use application #CU-14-02 of Hillview Design Collaborative, LLP to: 1) demolish the single family dwelling at 3 Cedar Court, 2) construct a 1,201 sq. ft. addition to the existing 1,700 sq. ft. single family dwelling at 88 Central Avenue, 3) create a 431 sq. ft. accessory residential unit in the expanded home, and 4) merge the two (2) lots at 88 Central Avenue & 3 Cedar Court. COMMENTS Administrative Officer Ray Belair and Planner Temporary Assignment Lee Krohn, AICP have reviewed the plans submitted on January 31, 2014, and offer the following comments. This application includes two existing homes on two adjoining but individual lots. The application proposes to remove one existing home, expand the remaining home, and create a one -bedroom accessory apartment within that expanded home. The two lots would be merged. Total building coverage decreases from 1501 sq ft to 1477 sq ft, and total lot coverage decreases from 1968 sq ft to 1930 sq ft. Being a corner lot, the combined property has two front yards and two side yards. The existing home to remain at 88 Central Avenue has a front yard setback of less than five feet, but is not changing in any way and will remain 'as is'. The side yard setback on the southerly side is at least five feet (except for existing steps) and thus conforms. The side yard setback on the easterly side is at least 8 feet deep, and thus conforms. The front yard setback along Cedar Court is the only one that requires a waiver, as the LDRs require a ten foot setback here. The existing home to remain sits as close as 5.1 feet to the property line, although removing the steps that are less than two feet from the line will improve upon existing conditions. The other home to be removed sits as close as 5.3 feet from the property line, although the front wall of the expansion will be longer, and will be 5.2 feet from the line (and another set of steps sitting less than one foot from the boundary will be removed). The Board is authorized to grant a waiver to within 5 feet of the front property line, so the proposed addition is at least theoretically permissible. This project is subject to review under the LDRs covering the Queen City Park zoning district (which itself also requires review under Section 3.11, nonconformities), Section 3.10 accessory residential units, Section 3.06(J), setback waiver, Section 13, parking, and Section 14.10 conditional uses. Zoning District & Dimensional Requirements: QCP Zoning District Required Existing Proposed �► Min. Lot Size 7500 S.F. 2858 sq. ft. 2858 sq. ft. *Max. Building Coverage 40% 53% 52% *Max. Overall Coverage 60% 69% 67% Min. Front Setback- addition* 10 ft. 5.3 ft. 5.2 ft. Min. Side Setback - addition** 5 ft. 1.1 ft. and 1.5 ft. 5.8 ft. and 8.0 ft. Min. Rear Setback 10 ft. N/A N/A. Max. Building Height 25 ft. 22 ft. 22 ft. Zoning compliance CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING f:\users\planning & zoning\development review board\staff comments\working folder staff comments\cu 14 02 88centralavenue hillvie 4 Existing nonconforming. The site plan is unclear in many respects, including the location of the lot line to be erased when the two lots are merged, and the existing sizes of each lot. A slight improvement is being made in building coverage and total coverage. Total lot size remains the same. * Front setbacks of existing house of 4.4 feet and 5.1 feet are not changing; house being removed is set back 5.3 feet today, and the replacement addition would be set back at least 5.2 feet. A waiver is required. ** The 5.6 feet side yard setback for the existing house conforms and remains. Side yard setbacks for the replacement addition are 5.8 feet and 8.0 feet, and thus conform, where the existing home to be removed does not. 4.08 QUEEN CITY PARK DISTRICT QCP F. Nonconforming Structures. Structures in the Queen City Park District shall be subject to the provisions of Article 3, Section 3.11, nonconformities, and to the following requirements and restrictions: (1) Any nonconforming structure may be altered provided such work does not. (a) Exceed in aggregate cost thirty-five percent (35%) for residential properties and twenty-five percent (25%) for nonresidential properties of the fair market value as determined by the City Assessor or by a separate independent appraisal approved by the Administrative Officer; or (b) Involve an increase to the structure's height or footprint, or otherwise involve an increase to the square footage of the building or structure. (2) The Development Review Board may approve any alteration which exceeds the thirty-five and twenty-five percent rule described above or which involves an increase to the structure's height, footprint or square footage subject to the provisions of Article 14, Conditional Use Review. (3) The Development Review Board shall determine that the proposed alteration or expansion will not adversely affect: (a) Views of adjoining and/or nearby properties, The building addition will essentially replace a single family dwelling which is located in the same vicinity as the addition, therefore this criteria will be met as the before and after impact on views will be similar or not worse. (b) Access to sunlight of adjoining and/or nearby properties; and The building addition will essentially replace a single family dwelling which is located in the same vicinity as the addition, therefore this criteria will be met as the before and after impact on sunlight will be similar or not worse. (c) Adequate on -site parking. The two (2) properties currently have a total of two (2) parking spaces and will have the same two (2) spaces after development, therefore no adverse effect is created. 1. The Board should discuss the above criteria and determine whether they are being met. r r CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING husersWanning & zoning\development review board\staff comments\workinq folder staff comments\cu 14 02 88centralavenue hillvie G. Additional Standards. (1) Development, construction, and alterations within the QCP District within one hundred (100) linear feet of the center line of Potash Brook shall be subject to the requirements of the Potash Brook Overlay District. (2) Multi family dwellings shall be subject to site plan review, as per Article 14, and shall be limited to a maximum of four (4) dwelling units per structure. Proximity of this lot to Potash Brook cannot be determined from the application materials. Applicant should provide testimony about the location of the addition relative to Potash Brook. This is not a multi family dwelling. 3.10 E. Accessory Residential Units. One (1) accessory residential unit constructed within or attached to a primary single-family dwelling or within an existing, permitted accessory structure shall be a permitted single family use, in accordance with the following criteria: (1) Floor space of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed thirty percent (30%) of the total habitable area of the single-family dwelling unit. According to the application, there is 2900 sq. ft. of total habitable area, and the accessory residential unit will be 427 sq. ft., or 15% of the total habitable area. This is well under the 30% limit. (2) The principal dwelling shall be owner -occupied. No information provided; sworn testimony should be sought on this matter. (3) The accessory dwelling unit shall be an efficiency or one -bedroom unit. The proposed accessory residential unit is a one -bedroom unit. (4) Adequate wastewater capacity is available to service the accessory unit, as demonstrated by issuance of a Wastewater Allocation or on -site wastewater permit pursuant to the South Burlington Ordinance Regulating the use of Public and Private Sanitary Sewerage and Stormwater Systems. This should be satisfied, especially given the removal of an existing single family home and its replacement with an accessory residential unit. There is no net change in the number of bedrooms (currently there is a two 2-bedroom homes; as proposed there will be a 3-bedroom home and a 1- bedroom accessory residential unit). (5) Two (2) additional off-street parking spaces shall be provided on the same lot, either in a garage or in a driveway, and not in any areas required to meet coverage limitations, or any front yard area other than a driveway, required by these Regulations. There is an internal conflict within the LDRs. This section requires two parking spaces for the accessory dwelling, yet Table 13-1: Parking Requirements, Residential Uses, requires only one parking space for an accessory residential unit. The more restrictive requirement applies, but is not satisfied, as no additional parking spaces are proposed. Applicant requests that the two (2) additional parking spaces required for the accessory residential unit be located in the community's common parking area. Applicant states that one of the existing homes already uses the neighborhood common parking J CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 5 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING f:\usersWanning & zoninMdevelopment review board\staff comments\working folder staff comments\cu 14 02 88centralavenue hillvie area. Approving that continued use in this legal forum may be reasonable, but also raises possible ramifications. How far away is that common parking area, and is it practical for an occupant to actually use? Who owns that common parking area, and is permission required of that party or those parties to continue that use? Even absent any concerns over that today, what happens when other landowners propose to also count that common parking for their private needs? As you will see below, Section 13.01(D) (1) allows the DRB to consider approving such off site parking, but there are both practical and legal complications with doing so. Following that section of the bylaw is a suggested, alternate approach. D. Off -Site Parking. (1) Required parking and loading spaces shall normally be provided upon the same lot as the use or structure to which they are accessory. However, there may be occasions where off -site parking is beneficial, whether off -site parking is combined with parking requirements for other uses or parcels, or just for one particular use. Parking could be provided off -site in combination with parking for other uses that are the some (e.g. several retail establishments could combine parking) or that are different. If the uses are the same, the parking requirement shall be determined by adding the parking space needs as per Tables 13-1 through 13-6. If the uses are different, a shared parking calculation shall be undertaken as per Section 13.01(E). A cleaner approach would be to acknowledge and accept going forward the nonconforming conditions that exist today (only two (2) on -site parking spaces serving these two separate homes exist at present, and two on -site parking spaces serving the newly -expanded home and accessory residential unit would exist upon approval). Although there is a change in physical form of the building, there is a lessening of land use density, changing from two separate, primary residential dwelling units to one primary residential dwelling unit with one accessory residential unit. (6) If occupancy of the unit is to be restricted in the deed of the single-family home to a disabled person, no additional off-street parking is required. No such restriction is proposed. A zoning permit shall be required for each accessory residential unit. Required. Conditional Use Review by the Development Review Board pursuant to Article 14, Section 14.10 shall be required if the establishment of the accessory residential unit involves the construction of a new accessory structure, an increase in the height or floor area of the existing single-family dwelling or existing accessory structure, or an increase in the dimensions of the off-street parking areas (i.e. garages and driveway areas) presently existing on the site. CONDITIONAL USE CRITERIA Pursuant to Section 14.10(E) of the Land Development Regulations, the proposed conditional use shall meet the following standards: 1. The proposed use, in its location and operation, shall be consistent with the planned character of the area as defined by the City of South Burlington Comprehensive Plan. The proposed addition is consistent with the planned character of the area, as defined by the CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 6 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING f\users\planning & zoning\development review board\staff comments\working folder staff comments\cu 14 02 88centralavenue hillvie Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use shall conform to the stated purpose of the district in which the proposed use is located. According to Section 4.08(A) of the Land Development Regulations, the QCP Zoning District is formed in order to encourage residential use at densities and setbacks that are compatible with the existing character of the Queen City Park neighborhood. It is designed to promote the area's historic development pattern of smaller lots and reduced setbacks. This district also encourages the conversion of seasonal homes to year round residences. There are currently two separate homes; as proposed there will be one principal home and one accessory residential unit within one structure. This proposed use conforms with the purposes of the district. 3. The Development Review Board must find that the proposed uses will not adversely affect the following: (a) The capacity of existing or planned municipal or educational facilities. There is no reason to believe that this will adversely affect the capacity of municipal services. (b) The planned character of the neighborhood or district in which the property is located, nor ability to develop adjacent property for appropriate uses. High density residential is consistent with the planned character of the area, as defined by the Comprehensive Plan. Density is not increased. (c) Traffic on roads and highways in the vicinity. There is no reason to believe that this will adversely affect traffic in the vicinity. Density is not increased. (d) Bylaws in effect. Except where the DRB has discretionary authority noted above, the property is in compliance with the bylaws in effect, or is existing nonconforming. The survey and more detailed site plans and accompanying information provide most of what is needed by the Board in this case. The required setback waiver is addressed above and below. Parking is addressed above. Absent a site visit or other information, questions may remain about possible adverse effects upon views or solar access for adjoining properties. The Board should carefully consider testimony from any neighbors as to any impact associated with this criteria. (e) Utilization of renewable energy resources. Addressed in (d) above. SETBACK WAIVER Section 3.06 (!) (1), (3) & (4) of the SBLDR states that: J CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON 7 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD PLANNING & ZONING f:\users\planning & zoning\development review board\staff comments\working folder staff comments\cu 14 02 88centralavenue hillvie (1) Side and Rear Setbacks. A structure may encroach into the required side or rear setback up to a distance equal to 50% of the side or rear setback requirement of the district, but in no event shall a structure have a side setback of less than five (5) feet. (3) Additional Encroachment Subject to DRB Approval. Encroachment of a structure into a required setback beyond the limitations set forth in (1) and (2) above may be approved by the Development Review Board subject to the provisions of Article 14, Conditional Uses, but in no event shall a structure be less than three (3) feet from a side or rear property line or less than five (5) feet from a front property line. In addition, the Development Review Board shall determine that the proposed encroachment will not have an undue adverse affect on: (a) views of adjoining and/or nearby properties; (b) access to sunlight of adjoining and/or nearby properties; (c) adequate on -site parking; and (d) safety of adjoining and/or nearby property. As described above, minimum side yard setbacks of 5 feet are met; the front yard setback for the proposed addition does not meet the normal ten foot setback requirement, but does meet the minimum 5 feet requirement of this section. The front wall of the addition, while longer than that of the house to be removed, is consistent in location with that existing front wall, and with the front wall of the main house to be retained. Parking has been addressed; views and solar access are noted above; and no evidence has yet been submitted suggesting that this application poses a safety problem. (4) Processing of a Request. Any request under subsections (1) - (3) above to expand an existing structure, or place a new structure, to within less than ten (10) feet of any property line shall include the submission of survey data prepared by a licensed surveyor showing the location of affected property lines, existing and/or proposed structures, and any other information deemed necessary by the Administrative Officer. A survey prepared by Button Professional Land Surveyors, PC, dated 3/19/2014 and stamped by a Vermont -registered land surveyor, has been submitted in order to clarify the issues described above, and to satisfy this requirement. LOT MERGER Although not technically an issue to which any regulatory standards apply under the LDRs, it is wise to advise the applicant that appropriate legal documents (amended deeds, lot merger agreement, etc) must still be created and recorded in the land records in order to effectuate the actual merger of these two separate lots. Any approval of this application should require that proof of recording be provided to the Administrative Officer at an appropriate time in the sequence of permit proceedings. RECOMMENDATION Provided that the Board finds the issues described above to be satisfied under the LDRs, and if no new information comes to light suggesting adverse impacts upon adjoining properties, then the case may be closed. CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & ZONING f:\users\planning & zoning\development review board\staff comments\working folder staff comments\cu 14 02 88centralavenue MIME Respe Ily submitted, Kt�x 2� � Ray and J. Belair, Administrative Officer ray From: directionshome@gmail.com on behalf of Mark Bromley <mark@hillviewdesign.com> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 10:41 AM To: ray Cc: Ben Bush; wingtao; Ben Bush Subject: Auxiliary parking lot Ray, I measured the distance from the community parking lot to the Northerly property line at 88 Central Ave at 162 yds. Please let me know if there is any other information that you need on this issue. Thank you, Mark Hillview Design Collaborative hillviewdesi ng com Office 802.434.2225 Mark Bromley, AIA Architect/Partner 802.461.5471 Ben Bush Designer/Partner 802.310.4570 PO Box 928 Richmond, VT 05477 ray From: Antonia Jolles <wingtao@myfairpoint.net> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 11:03 AM To: ray Cc: Mark Bromley; Ben Bush Subject: Fwd: Parking at 3 Cedar Court Hi Ray, Below you can see the email response from the Fire District Prudential Committee about the parking for 3 Cedar Court. I hope this will suffice for the DRB. Please let me know. Stacy Jolles Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: waorleans <waorleansgppdbrochure.com> Date: April 4, 2014, 10:23:49 AM EDT To: wingtaogmyfaiKpoint.net Subject: Re: Parking April 4, 2014 To Whom It May Concern, The Prudential Committee of Queen City Park has reviewed Stacy Jolles and Nina Beck building project at 3 Cedar Court and understand it will not add any new parking spaces to that property. We have agreed to continued to let residents of that property use our overflow lot as they have done for the last fifty years. Bill Orleans President, QCP Prudential Committee N rnpervious Surfaces r- _„ 71 i it Lot size=2836 S.F. +/- Building 1 coverage=883 S.F. +/- Building 2 coverage=618 S.F. +(- Total building coverage=1501 S.F. +/- Impervious surfaces=467 S.F. +/- total lot coverage=1968 S.F. +/- =69% lot coverage by buildings only=53% 1 Existing Site 4.::.µt, Lot size=2836 S.F. +/- Building coverage=1477 S.F. +/- Impervious surfaces=424 S.F. +/- Total lot coverage=1901 S.F. +/- =67% lot coverage by buildings only=52% 2 Proposed Plan rr T I' k � �isting footprint Site Schematic RE01I\I M3, "5 ` , SHEET NUMBER RAFTCOPY The use of the Schematic drawings for construction purposes shall be solely at the Contractors and/or Owners nsk. The Architect can accept no responsibility for the use of these drawings for construction purposes. Continued involvement of the Architect for the construction phase of the project shall require drawings marked tOG RE SS PRINT "For Cnstruct/T and shall require suitable development of the drawings and documents at the discretion of SK1 30,01, Existing Bedroom o . To Remain Existing Office To Remain Storage Dn ON _J Bath Existing Bath To Remain 20, 0" Bedroom ------ ---- 71- Studio Proposed - ----- Addition Second Floor Plan —————————————————————————-—————-—- 10, 0" 1 7 Proposed Addition L 4-' Kitchen Existing Living Rm. Living Rm. To Remain Accessory Use This Floor Only 16' 0" Bath 7 Man Layout FF This To b� dete—Ined Bedroom jj r Existing Entry Existing Kitchen Bath ------- -- ------------ - ------ - - ----- -------- 2'10" 15'10" 43 4" 2'6" Elf SHEET NUMBER I e use of the Schematic drawings for construction purposes shall be 5clely at the Contractors ands or Owners tAFT COPY T17nsk. The Architect can accept no responsibility for the use of these drawings for construction purposes JC�nb='volvement of the Architect for the construction phase of the protect shall require drawings marked LOGRESS PRINT .or involvement ff and shahrequire suitable development of the drawings and documents at the discretion of the Architect, with tho an—val of the Own— Th— rr,-- and dnrijt—nts roo,ji- har may —f he Prr'tM 1 a First Floor Plan 114' = 1'-0" A1.1 'ART {i i w tiikw W,^ M: �rp I r zr 1''♦,��r �:.'�+ - ` flv vZ.""'_ '�A ,,'v\, �v',v,� "�y�+J',r, The use of the Schematic drawings for construction purposes shall he solely at the Contractors and/or Owners RAFT COPY risk. The Architect can accept no responsibility for the use of these d,rawrngs for ionstructron purposes ROG RE SS PRINT Continued Involvement of the Architect for the constriction phase of the project shall require drawings marked Construction "and dshall requ- suitable development of the drawings and do, ^ umeots at the drsrretron of North Elevation ( J scale 1/4" = 1' " North View Not To Scale 22' Now construction at it's highest point will riot exceed existing ,logo height E, eibng house 88 Central Ave EED E+-�^^^�11 f .I ❑ ,� ,�.j". , �^'w, y - �Ifa,",;'"�Vh,..\, fiu. 1,VA;TM,,,,.,, ,♦ tit ��.��h�ii . ^e, MN^ I iii;r.'�,. 2 2' I rr w+ �,,,, Y;r Vrp�r',. ,�A,',�"% M .u�'�vr :.�1":�,i, ";•,�n�, +rVd e,t New construcEl tion at It's highest t' i ._.,..--------------�----------`-------------,jlA�r„'r" point will not exceed existing y' 'fn. c*"',„I,.. µy �, ;;: ,;,,,'�:"`,� r»Iw;�'�° fr"", ." - ndeheighty '4; rv„,t^h•`°«�,M,. :.,n '¢,wv' ,�) 1M x q+ R,. 71 .11M' J ,"�'kir,• ,Hyi„�,�; 1:1.4i.':.':r'. .,� t; { I' 4 1�; 1 „ I i Existing house 88 Central Ave s— ———————— —— — — — — — — South Elevation 2 scale 1/4" - 1'-0" " ,r(• �, i�'ry�, a�M' i;' •eaa : ",,,<w.T��,, � "*p,,.,r., ., u'+� ;.r,7. •.., "}+ South View Not To Scale The use of the Schematic drawings for construction purposes shall be solely at the Contractors and/or Owners tAFT COPY risk, The Architect can accept no responsibility for the ose of these drawings for construction purpose tOG RESS PRINT Continued Involvement of the Architect for the construction phase of the protect shall require drawings marked "For Construction' and shall require suitable devefopment of the drawlrgs and documents at the drscrenar of ♦he A...F. i ....sA — =n.,.�n..el -1— n,."— M.,-.. ,r��,,,.,.,.. ,.,.I .I,,. ..,....,n,- -„ -- l.—--,,..,.,r h, If"', 111110— Oesign Collaborative (802r474-2225 p0 Bct 428 Richmond, VT 05477 Nark Bromley AIA ArChltaet 602.461.5471 marslahlllvlewdi algn,com !an Bush 802.310.4570 bsnillihlllrlawdeslgn cum Them d.—rt. are the work Instruments of 4111vlew Design Collaborative and have been prepared specifically and solely for the project named herein. They are not suitable for use on other projects or In other locations without the participation of Hlllvlew Design Collaborative. Reproduction of these documa Ma forum other the named project Is prohibited. Hill— Design Collaborative shell be deemed author and owner of thase documents and shall retain common law, statutory and other reserved rights, Including copyright PROJECT lolles/Beck Besldeoce South Surlington, ISSUE/ REVISION LOG 01.31.14 --_ _ _------------- --- -- j, I• i• SHEET TITLE EISMONs r' FJ E' ,%' �- SHEET NUMBER r. RAG , A2.2 I 4 East Elevation scale 1/4" > V-©" " East View 2 Not To Scale The use of the Schematic drawings for instruction purposes shall be solely at the Contractors and/or Owners tAFT COPY risk The Architect can accept no responsibility for the use of these drawings for construction purposes COG RESS PRINT Contmued involvement of the Architect for the construction phase of the project shall require drawings marked ` For Construc,6on"and shall regwr f su¢ahle deve(Tment of the drawings ar)d do, finents at the drso etron of IL 22' j I —_ New construction xt It's highest point will not exceed existing 111 ndge height t it 3 West Elevation (Existing 88 Central Ave) West View 1' Not To Scale L. . Miilvlew Design Collaborative t802)M 222' PO Box 928 Ridtmond, Vi 05477 Mark broe hair AIA Arthlhct These documents are the work Instruments of Hlllvkw Design Collaborative and have been prepared spec@Iully and solely for the project named herein. They are not sultabie for use on other projects or In other locations wlthout the participation of Hlllvlew Design Collaborative. Reproduction or mess documents forum other the named project Is prohibited. Hlllvlew Design Collaborative chall be deemed author and owner of thus documents and shall retain �emman law, statutory and other reserved rights, Including copyright PR030CT Joliallack Residence South Burlington, ISSUE/ REVISION LOG Y01.31.14 neuauena SHEET NUMBER A2.3 r r gr8 �1r4 �IZ Ill r .Roo � IMCIAE9 .qv N74'01 U0=' &per rYY rR HQ1C -- -- N74V MRl rRLW }IRHr a CEDAR STREET (nX mem i smrs a,w++[r r_r r - r� r owerr $I 88 CENTRAL �1 AVENUE At z V 4 ru n 41' N 74'04'00" W - WOM O A rW I 25W i ♦♦,11111/t/RR mwm.nn rr.n .. aw wRwrc loom+ asrur m . rrmrw R.r.9.' •r �wxrw.�or r.+w.�t r. ow w,rt ♦ 0 { V wmMwr ,.ni . r wmarre L- i~ Re— LM �•�� n. ,.c...e .. wR x.. ppw n en. cRy .r s..a wnnrm iiw R.ca�. A W.I.r.X.n LEONARD `f -io a la w b .r rrw T.....n..e♦ .�. r......1..,.w. //ry r.r .hM V.r (lY�.1 •.. �.w n n. «,r�.�. w�nry _ N r.ab (U) A,) rm.r0 10@(AY oon XOI e.rrWi .fix an. ..q�v.m ri .r Mrm.�e St.wh mr. navel.• ns..on (r).cJ. rxwc I AMBLO e nnr nc a. .r ono w nR: nrRXsn. ec rRa�eRra a rw.exry Rir,rs No. 695 ^ GRAPHIC SCALE t II1Ch — to teat 03-21-2011 ,,��/III1111 ,♦♦ X RmW LS lT Al0, O.M I-E 7.1---re --- mum o. AfOH gAOf• AlL9 Kill THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO DEPICT THE EXISTING BUILDING LOCA77ONS FOR COMPARISON OF SETBACK DIMENSIONS. NOT 70 BE USED IN 77YE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY OR PROPERTY RIGHTS J I Lot and Building Coverage: • Total lot coverage reduced from 1968 s.f. to 1930 s.f., 69% to 67% • Total building coverage reduced from 1501 s.f, to 1477 s.f., 53% to 52% • Impervious surfaces reduced from 467 s.f. to 424 s.f. • Proposed single family dwelling with included Accessory Residential Unit in lieu of two separate single family dwellings Setbacks and building height: • Increased side yard setback at south side from 13" to 5'-8" • Increased front yard setback at Cedar court north elevation by proposed removal of porch and associated entry from 1'-9" to over 5 ft, to align with main face of existing building. • Building height to match existing at Approx. 22 ft. Plan consolidation: • Total Bedrooms remain the same from a combined total of 4 existing to a proposed 3 bedrooms and one additional bedroom ( Accessory Residential Unit) o Accessory Residential Unit occupies 15% of the total habitable area of the building, half of the allowable sire. Parking: • Two existing and customary parking spaces retained at Central Ave and Cedar Court o Existing parking spot accessed from Cedar Court increased in depth • Single family, two bedroom, dwelling presently utilizing the common neighborhood lot for parking is to be removed and replaced by a one bedroom Accessory Residential Unit reducing overall effective parking needs. • Off street parking determined to be acceptable for the one bedroom Accessory Residential Unit per communication from Administrative officer (12/24/13) — per Section 13.01(D) (1) Note: Drawings on this page reference survey completed 3/21/2014 by Button Professional Land Surveyors. See record drawing attached Bracketed porch roof and steps removed — current parking stays the same (tom I' 4.90' (sm�) I 8.20' rs".) Shaded portion represents 88 Central Ave existing .__._ Tree removed as rt of proposed project I CEDAR COURT / ProposedImproved parking Impervious Surfaces —/Front stoop rartwved 8. 07' awl $.00' r�' fx-a°,wrwx� IA40' i 5.76' { Existing structle to be removed Lot size=2858 S.F. +/- Building coverage=1477 S.F. +/- Impervious surfaces=453 S.F. +/- Total lot coverage=1930 S.F. +/- =67% lot coverage by buildings only=52% NEIGHBOR STRUCTURE\ I � Curren[ Parking F', g 4,110 I I — - - --- -- - - — - - 4 CEDAR COURT Current Parking - Impervious Surfaces� 4} v 5.60' a.zu- 5.80' 5.60' Lot size=2858 S.F. +/- Building 1 coverage=883 S.F. +/- Building 2 coverage=618 S.F. +/- Total building coverage=1501 S.F. +/- Impervious surfaces=469 S.F. +/- total lot coverage=1968 S.F. +/- =69% lot coverage by buildings only=53% 2 Proposed Plan scale 1/8" - 1'-0" 1 Existing Site scale 1/8" = 1'-0" ' Wooden Fence Wooden Fence Porch to be removed 2'10"? 32'0" 35' 4" 6' 1 7/8" 1 3/8' (D_�econ Floor Plan a" 1 23' 5 3/4" 23' 5 314" 1 First Floor Plan 1/4. - 1,_0„ 5' 7" �I 5' 7" ii Porch to be removed , I in•n" 32' 0" i i Existing Living Rm. To Remain -- - ---------------- ------------- - ------- Existing Entry I i l 2'10"+ 15,10" Existing Kitchen I i I I Proposed hAddition I I 26' 0" I I — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — — 2 Second Floor Plan 1/4" V-0" I l 10'0^ 1 22'6" I � i I Proposed Addition � � I I ' I I i Kitchen I � i I � i Living Rm. I i _ _Accessory Residential Unit: One bedroom 16' 0- I i Bath i I -- - uvl l I I /'l�L�l � I ( - fTITl7lllllll t- Men Layou! q \Q)- Me— ro be determined --► Bedroom , � i I Bath 10' 0" I � I o I ' -- _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ I 43'4" , 2'6" First Floor Plan 1 1/4" = 1.-0" �'u N I Accessory Residential Unit = 427 F o S Y Total area of First and Second Flr = 2 f a a o d 900 s • • - • . - • - 1 1 ral • 1 - - • 176791 11 Fm — 1 5 —Accessory Residential Unit 1/4• - 1'-0" 0 First Floor Area Schematic i 1/4" = 1'-0" 1 1, "y �i Y' Jt �i { 7 h' — 7r: 1 f ^ F, „ r; t' 3. n C' ^;C .i :S p. N;. A' J ` d: S' k! , yI G Y M SI h r La ' ;a 1 1 1 V , { 1 Y' •R Vr i, } cs ya, ` , t k' s� i� "u Ik' k :i r4' M t' t. 'I �x .j 4 x ¢ J �»���\�.���� \.w:: . ^` � �� � � \� �y � \� �� � ^� ,» \ \r� ... �� y� � ^� 2! ^ \� � « x \ \;} » / . � ��^^ ` . \\\�\ � � ��� ` `�\� �\����� � \. � � � ��\� — » /.. �� : I / y\ x \ w� :.. . m.� .c .: 7� w//`� ,\�:� 11 Centrail Ave RU-11-1 88 Central Ave. Improvements Lot and Building Coverage: • Total lot coverage reduced from 1968 s.f. to 1930 s.f., 69% to 67% • Total building coverage reduced from 1501 s.f. to 1477 s.f., 53% to 52% • Impervious surfaces reduced from 467 s.f. to 424 s.f. • Proposed single family dwelling with included Accessory Residential Unit in lieu of two separate single family dwellings Setbacks and building height: • Increased side yard setback at south side from 13" to 5'-8" • Increased front yard setback at Cedar court north elevation by proposed removal of porch and associated entry from 1'-9" to over 5 ft. to align with main face of existing building. • Building height to match existing at Approx. 22 ft. Plan consolidation: • Total Bedrooms remain the same from a combined total of 4 existing to a proposed 3 bedrooms and one additional bedroom ( Accessory Residential Unit) o Accessory Residential Unit occupies 15% of the total habitable area of the building, half of the allowable size. Parking: • Two existing and customary parking spaces retained at Central Ave and Cedar Court o Existing parking spot accessed from Cedar Court increased in depth • Single family, two bedroom, dwelling presently utilizing the common neighborhood lot for parking is to be removed and replaced by a one bedroom Accessory Residential Unit reducing overall effective parking needs. • Off street parking determined to be acceptable for the one bedroom Accessory Residential Unit per communication from Administrative officer (12/24/13) — per Section 13.01 (D) (1) TRUSTEE DEED INTO TRUST KNOW ALL PEOPLE BY THESE PRESENTS, that ANTONIA STACY JOLLES and NINA RACHEL BECK, both of South Burlington Vermont, or their successors in trust, as TRUSTEES of the ANTONIA STACY JOLLES AND NINA RACHEL BECK REVOCABLE TRUST, created by Trust Agreement dated November 7, 2006, as amended by First Amendment dated November 12, 2012 (as amended, the "Trust Agreement") (together, the "Grantor"), for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by the Grantor, by these presents do freely GIVE, GRANT, SELL, CONVEY, AND CONFIRM unto ANTONIA STACY JOLLES and NINA RACHEL BECK, both of South Burlington Vermont, or their successors in trust, as TRUSTEES of the ANTONIA STACY JOLLES AND NINA RACHEL BECK REVOCABLE TRUST, created by Trust Agreement dated November 7, 2006, as amended by First Amendment dated November 12, 2012 (together, the "Grantee"), and the Grantee's successors and assigns forever, all of the Grantor's right, title and interest in and to certain land and premises located in the City of South Burlington, County of Chittenden, and State of Vermont, described as follows (the "Property"): Parcel is Being a portion of the lands and premises as conveyed to the Grantor by Trust Deed from Antonia Stacy Jolles, dated December 28, 2006 and recorded in Volume 771, Page 280 of the City of South Burlington land records (the "Land Records") and being more particularly described therein as follows: "Being a lot of land with buildings thereon, situated on the easterly side of Central Avenue in Queen City Park, the dwelling house being known and designated as No. 88, Central Avenue. Being Lot No. 56 and 12 %2 feet off the westerly side of Lot No. 57 as laid down on a plan of Queen City Park Association recorded in Volume 5 at Page 52 of the aforementioned Land Records, except as reserved by one Rugg in his deed to Helen M. Shaw dated March 8, 1892 and recorded in Volume 3 at page 208 of the aforesaid Land Records. Said lots are further depicted on a Plan entitled "Plan of Central Section of Queen City Park", South Burlington, Vermont, by Arthur W. Hoag dated June 30, 1947 and recorded in Volume 24 at Page 275 of the aforesaid Land Records." Being all of Parcel 1 as previously conveyed to Antonia Stacy Jolles and Nina R. Beck by Warranty Deed from Thomas L. Nelson and Mary Ellen Giroux, dated May 6, 1996, and recorded in Volume 392, Page 383 of the Land Records, and by Corrective Warranty Deed from Thomas L. Nelson and Mary Ellen Giroux to Antonia Stacy Jolles, dated August 26, 1996, and recorded in Volume 398, Page 579 of the Land Records. Dense, Parcel II: Knapp & McAndrew, P C 209 Battery Street Also being all of the lands and premises conveyed to the Grantor by Warranty Deed from PO Box988 Penn Yiota Ahladas and Joni Avrutick dated October 28 2011, and recorded in Volume Burlington, VT Y > > 05402-0988 1041, Page 164 of the Land Records; and commonly known as 3 Cedar Court. (802)864-5751 {B1175255.2 14656-0001} Dense, Knapp & McAndrew, PC 209 Battery Street P O Box 988 Burlington, VT 05402-0988 (802)864-5751 The lands and premises conveyed herein are depicted as "Thomas Nelson & Mary Ellen Giroux" and "Daisy Maynard" on a survey entitled "Boundary Survey and Boundary Line Adjustment for Thomas Peterson, #5 Cedar Court," prepare by Vermont Land Surveyors, recorded in the Land Records on December 18, 1992 in Map Volume 286, Page 68 of the Land Records (the "Survey"), and being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at an unmarked point in the easterly edge of the right of way of Central Avenue and the southerly edge of the right of way of Cedar Court (also known as 6th Street), marking the northwesterly corner of the lands and premises conveyed herein; Thence proceeding along the southerly edge of Cedar Court in a slightly southeasterly direction a distance of 77.10' to an unmarked point in the westerly boundary of lands now or formerly of Thomas Peterson, marking the northeasterly corner of the lands and premises conveyed herein; Thence turning to the right and proceeding along the boundary of said Peterson lands S 15°56' W a distance of 37.00' to an unmarked point in the northerly boundary of lands now or formerly of David & Carol Wilber, marking the southeasterly corner of the lands and premises conveyed herein; Thence turning to the right and proceeding along the boundary of said Wilber lands N 74004' W a distance of 77.40' to an unmarked point in the easterly edge of Central Avenue; Thence turning to the right and proceeding along the easterly edge of Central Avenue N 16023'30" E a distance of 37', more or less, to the point or place of beginning. In the event of a discrepancy between the above description and that on the Survey, the Survey shall prevail. By this conveyance the Grantor and Grantee intend to merge said Parcel I and Parcel II together into a single parcel. Meaning and intending to specifically EXCLUDE from this conveyance those certain lands situated westerly of Central Avenue, and being a portion of the lands and premises conveyed to the Grantor by Trust Deed from Antonia Stacy Jolles dated December 29, 2006 and recorded in Volume 771, Page 280 of the Land Records, said excluded parcel being all of Parcel 2 previously conveyed to Antonia Stacy Jolles and Nina R. Beck by Warranty Deed from Thomas L. Nelson and Mary Ellen Giroux, dated May 6, 1996, and recorded in Volume 392, Page 383 of the Land Records, and by Corrective Warranty Deed from Thomas L. Nelson and Mary Ellen Giroux to Antonia Stacy Jolles, dated August 26, 1996, and recorded in Volume 398, Page 579 of the Land Records. Said EXCLUDED parcel is more particularly described in said Trust Deed, dated December 29, 2006, and recorded in Volume 771, Page 280 of the Land Records as follows: "Being also a lot of land, situated on the westerly side of Central Avenue in Queen City Park with a frontage thereon and uniform width of 40 feet, more or less to the low water (131175255.2 14656-00011 Dense, Knapp & McAndrew, PC 209 Battery Street PO Box 988 Burlington, VT 05402-0988 (802)864-5751 mark of Lake Champlain, and being further described in the Warranty Deed of Queen City Park Association to Charlie F. White dated November 6, 1944 and recorded in Volume 20 at Page 26 of the aforesaid Land Records." Grantor hereby conveys, but by quitclaim only, all right, title and interest it may have in the lands lying between the center line of Central Avenue and the westerly boundary of the lands and premises conveyed herein. Reference is hereby made to the instruments and plans referred to above and the records thereof, and the instruments and plans referred to therein and the records thereof, in further aid of this description. Reference is hereby made to that certain Certificate of Trustees of the Antonia Stacy Jolles and Nina Rachel Beck Revocable Trust Agreement (the "Trust Agreement"), dated February 19, 2010, and recorded in Volume 921, Page 329 of the Land Records (the "Trust Certificate"). Grantor herein certifies that the Trust Agreement has not been amended since February 19, 2010 with regards to the powers of the Trustees recited in paragraph 6 of the Trust Certificate. The Property may be subject to the following: 1, all legally enforceable easements, rights of way, covenants, conditions, permits, declarations, and other restrictions on use of record to the extent not otherwise extinguished by the Vermont Marketable Record Title Act (27 V.S.A. §§ 601-604); and 2. rights of the public and others legally entitled thereto in any portion of the Property lying within the boundaries of a public road, way, street, trail, or alley to the extent not otherwise extinguished by the Vermont Marketable Record Title Act (27 V.S.A. §§ 601-604). TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the Property, with all the privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the Grantee, ANTONIA STACY JOLLES and NINA RACHEL BECK, or their successors in trust, as TRUSTEES of the ANTONIA STACY JOLLES AND NINA RACHEL BECK REVOCABLE TRUST, and the Grantee's successors and assigns, for the uses and purposes set forth in this instrument and in the Trust Agreement; And the Grantor, ANTONIA STACY JOLLES and NINA RACHEL BECK, or their successors in trust, as Trustees of the Trust Agreement, does covenant with the Grantee, and the Grantee's successors and assigns, that until the ensealing of these presents, the Grantor, acting in the capacity as Trustees, is the sole owner of the Property and is authorized by law and the Trust Agreement to convey the Property to the Grantee in the manner set forth in this deed; that the Grantor, acting in the capacity as Trustees, has in all things observed the direction of the law and the Trust Agreement in this conveyance; and the Grantor, and the Grantor's successors as trustee, shall WARRANT AND DEFEND the Property against all persons claiming the Property by, from, or under the Trust Agreement, or the Grantor, as Trustees, but against no other person. {B 1175255.2 14656-00011 Dense, Knapp & McAndrew, PC 209 Battery Street PO Box988 Burlington, VT 05402-0988 (802) 864-5751 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Antonia Stacy Jolles and Nina Rachel Beck have executed this instrument this day of , 2014. ANTONIA STACY JOLLES, as Trustee of the Antonia Stacy Jolles and Nina Rachel Beck Revocable Trust, u/t/a dated November 7, 2006, as amended NINA RACHEL BECK, as Trustee of the Antonia Stacy Jolles and Nina Rachel Beck Revocable Trust, u/t/a dated November 7, 2006, as amended STATE OF VERMONT COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. At Burlington, in said County, this day of , 2014, ANTONIA STACY JOLLES and NINA RACHEL BECK, as Trustees of the Antonia Stacy Jolles and Nina Rachel Beck Revocable Trust, personally appeared and they acknowledged the execution of this instrument, by them subscribed, to be their free act and deed acting in their capacity as Trustees of the Antonia Stacy Jolles and Nina Rachel Beck Revocable Trust. Before me, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 2/10/2015 {131175255.2 14656-0001) 'W Yi ell Potash Brook 3/31/2014 Gmall -Re: Monday morning work- follow-up for Central Ave. Gplil t� Re: Monday morning work - follow-up for Central Ave. Leonard Amblo <Ihamblo@bapls.com> Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:23 AM To: Mark Bromley <mark@hilNewdesign.com> Cc: Christopher Haggerty <haggerty@bapls.com> Good morning Mark, Attached is a PDF showing the survey projected over recent 2013 hi-res orthophotos (April 2013). As you can see, it's kind of tough seeing a clear edge of brook directly in the rear of the subject property. The Mark Ward survey (volume 286, page 68) dimensioned the projection of the southerly property line to Potash Brook, by adding the measurements up along the line, the total along that line is +/-239.2' (10+131.20+98= 239.20') from the southeasterly comer, along the outherly property line projection to Pot Ash Brook. That seems reasonable with the Digital Orthophoto. I projected the northerly property line using Mark Ward's measurements to Pot Ash Brook, that projection distance calculation is +/-210' Let me know if you have questions. I hope this helps! Len or I /0 06, 1 j 5/. 64 , � � ' 25. 00' /. T5' b� T/E/INE A'ENNET11 SC114 o CATHARYNA KERR k4 k, p t/OL. 209, PG. 2/7 Ov a; h► hVUSE T iI . 04' `� I s 't Q� CEDAR COURT 1 f61h STREET) TT,/O' ` AMYNARL? n� ' Ol lAS MZ SON AM 24,P(;. 44 8 YOL. 284, 1062E T9 w IW,4RYELLEN G/ROUXAr Ih I VOL. ,3/5, PG. 70 TT. 40" C- L , L " //fDUSE 0 5 �-N 74*04' W l DAY/D 8 CAROL WILMR- 1/0L.142, PG. 4/ . ry ifl z/NE L/NE S T4'04'E'— ELLEry k 10L. 219, f TH0IV45 PFTERS01� MOL. 2/, P6 114 VOL. 120,, PG. /7--19 L'OL. /08, PG. 496 b' —N74W'W NOTES.: /, BOUNOARYLINES WER- ERE, FNT/TLED "PLAN OF CENTRAL AURMIN HOAG L. S. DATED VZ ON 03/09/70 2 OA1SYA,,,4YN.4RO:S DEED RE, OF OT #57A5 SHOWN ON A. DATED SA1,0 A PLANIVENTIONEV ,490 E WA. Otle TO MOREDETAIL BEING SOI-171 NE Oc ETERSQN /,: ray From: directionshome@gmail.com on behalf of Mark Bromley <mark@hillviewdesign.com> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 3:11 PM To: ray Cc: wingtao Subject: 88 Central Ave and Continuance of Application Mr. Belair, Thank you for your assistance and clarification regarding our application pertaining to 88 Central Ave. We understand that you have determined that the project may involve a setback waiver and, as such, requires a document prepared by a licensed surveyor clearly showing the boundaries of the property and setbacks for the existing building and proposed addition from those boundaries. We understand that this information is due on March 14 if we are to maintain our position on the agenda and our anticipated meeting scheduled for March 18. We are diligently trying to secure this information but may not be able to secure this information in time for our March 18 meeting. Per your suggestion, we would like to formally request a continuance of our application with the hope that we might be able to secure a position on the April 1 meeting. We understand that this will require submission of this additional documentation by March 21. We intend to provide the requested material by March 21. Assuming we cannot provide this material by tomorrow (3/14/14) - can you please confirm that our attendance at the meeting of March 18 is not required? Stacy Jolles is the contact person listed on our application but I'd like to request that you provide a return email, "reply to all" confirming receipt of this request so that I can be assured of receipt and acknowledgment of our request for a continuance of the application. Thank you for your assistance, Mark Bromley AIA Hillview Design Collaborative hillviewdesi ng com Office 802.434.2225 Mark Bromley, AIA Architect/Partner 802.461.5471 Ben Bush Designer/Partner 802.310.4570 PO BOX 928 Richmond, VT 05477 Public Notice PUBLIC HEARING SOUTH BURLINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD The South Burlington Development Review Board will hold a public hearing in the South Burlington City Hall Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on March 18, 2014 at 7:00 P.M, to consider the following: .-. Conditional use application #CU-14-02 of Hillview Design Collab- orative, LLP to: 1) demolish the single family dwelling at 3 Cedar Court, 2) construct a 1,201 sq. ft. addition to the existing 1,700 sq. ft. single family dwelling at 88 Central Avenue, 3) create a 431 sq. ft. accessory residential unit in the expanded home, and 4) merge the two (2) lots at 88 Central Avenue & 3 Cedar Court. Tim Barritt, Chair South Burlington Development Review Board Copies of the application are available for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall. Participation in the local proceeding is a prerequisite to the right to take any subsequent appeal. February 27, 2014 Classi*fieds AFFORDABLE APARTMENTS Pines Senior Living Community in South Burlington offers 1 & 2 bedroom apartments. Rent includes all utilities. , Optional living and health services. Community tour every Wednesday at 12:30 p.m. 865-1109 CANDLES: LARGE CAKE CANDLE & RING: Large 3 wick cake candle measuring 6" x 6". Also 12" candle ring with assorted berries. Candle never used- on the original cake theOther Paper • otherpapervt.com • February 27, 2014 • 27 Co_m__-.m___uni Red Cross Heroes Nominations Due March 3 The Vermont & the New Hamp- shire UpperValleyAmerican Red Cross has extended the nomina- tions period to March 3, 2014 for its inaugural Heroes Breakfast. The American Red Cross has heard an outpouring of stories of personal bravery and acts of great kindness and wants to en- sure enough time for all who are interested to submit their Hero choices. 860-660-9130 ex.11 SB ROTARY. 7:30-8:30 a.m. Vermont National Country Club,1227 Dorset St., SB. Program: Michael Dab- rowski, "Making Music with a Social Mission." More information: www. southburlingtonrotaryorg YOUNG ADVENTURERS' CLUB OUTING: 9-11 a.m. Red Rocks Park, South Burlington. Green Mountain Club leads late winter/early spring scavenger hunt at Red Rocks Park. What does your little eye spy? Easy, 1-2 flat miles. Contact leader by 2/27/14. Kelley Christie, kelleym- christie@gmail.com. PRE -TOWN MEETING DAY. 7 p.m ing 11 "xl5"; no missing pieces. F.H. Tuttle Middle School Dorset St., Also 2 hard cover 1950 copies SB. A pre -town meeting is sched- Ghost ofMysteryRancho with dust Wed with budget presentations by jackets. $15. 497-0865 (02/20) city and school officials to be fol- lowed by candidate forums. SOLID WOOD TODDLER BED:: MENTAL HEALTH EDUCATION Includes cribsize mattress and ° or+r V_ ­ n - — ATAA KT �TTP_ Calendar Resources at 802-860-4449. Repeats Wednesday March 5. VM'gTERWOMEN'SWELLNESS SE- RIES- Introduction to Chi Running and Walking: 6:30-7:30 p.m. Wom- en's Source for Sports, 4050 Williston Road, South Burlington. Since 1999, the Chi Running technique has helped thousands of runners at all levels, transform their technique, and open the door to pain -free, easier and more enjoyable running. Polly, a physical therapist and Certi- fied Chi Instructor, will talk about how to improve efficiency and performance, by engaging your core and relaxing limbs to create move- ment, and show you the posture, lean and lift that will give you insight into basis of Chi Running/Walking. $15 registration fee will be donated to the Pierson Foundation for Brain Cancer Research. 863-3233. WEDNFSDAY, MARCH 5 PCA INFO SESSION: 9:30 a.m. Vis- iting Nurse Association, 1110 Prim Road, Colchester. VNA presents an informational session about a free training program to teach people to become Personal Care Assistants (PCAs). PCA Ladder program of- fered in conjunction with CCV. For more information contact Human Resources at 802-860-4449. SB ROTARY 7:30-8:30 a.m. 7:30-8:30 a.m. Rotisserie, Williston Rd., South Burlington. Program: Miss Vermont 2013, Jeannette Achee. More info: southburlingtonrotary.org. EVENING OWL HOOT HIKE: 5:30 - 7 p.m. Niquette Bav State Park, CHITTENDEN COUNTY CHESS CLUB: Come play the game of kings. Play chess against a real human being not a computer. Chess Club meets every Thursday evening beginning at 7:15pm, Faith United Methodist Church, 899 Dorset Street, SB. Novice and experts welcome. Inexpensive competitive fun; only $2 per eve- ning. Call Dave Carter at 324-1143 for information. CHITTENDEN COUNTY STAMP CLUB - Meeting every first Wednesday of the month at GE Healthcare, 40 IDX Drive, SB. 6:15 p.m. 660-4817. SENIOR ART & CRAFT CLASSES: Shelburne Bay Senior Living Com- munity (Newly named The Lodges at Shelburne Bay) is offering Senior Art & Craft Classes to non-residents. Fridays & Saturdays, 1:30-3:30 pm. Friday's class is the Art Class and Saturday's class is the Craft Class. 864-0604. SENIOR EXERCISE FOR BAL- ANCE: Gentle cardiovascular exercises, strength training, strat- egies for stability and flexibility. Many exercises done from chairs. $5/class. Monday and Friday, 10- 11 a.m., SB Community Senior Center at the Pines Senior Living Center, 7 Aspen Drive by Green Mountain Suites, Dorset Street. Classes led by professionally certified trainer and group fitness instructor. 658- 7477. SUPPORT YOUR VETERANS: VFW Post 782, 176 South Winooski Avenue, Burlington. Events open to the public. Line dancing every Thursday, 6-9 p.m., $10, class at 6, dance at 7. Bar Bingo every Friday, 6-9 p.m. $1 card. Dancing U CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 22nd day of February, 2014, a copy of the foregoing public notice for Conditional Use Application #CU-14-02, was sent by U.S. mail, postage prepaid to the owners of all properties adjoining the subject property to development, without regard to any public right-of-way, and including the description of the property and accompanying information provided by the City of South Burlington. I further certify that this notification was provided to the following parties in accordance with 24 V.S.A. §4464(a) and Section 17.06(B) of the South Burlington Land Development Regulations: List of recipients: David and Carol Wilbur 90 Central Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Ken Schatz and Trinka Kerr 86 Central Avenue South Burlington, VT 05403 Jill Entis 5 Cedar Court South Burlington, VT 05403 Andy Bromage and Allison Moncrief Bromage 102 Riverview Avenue Branford, CT 06405 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form. Rev. 1-2012 Dated at South Burlington, Vermont, this 22nd day of February, 2014. i Printed Name: N J ;� ��' �L c ; IFi ` 164 %e i,. ot L �L Phone number and email: -2� ,T Signature: Date: Remit to: City of South Burlington Department of Planning & Zoning 575 Dorset Street South Burlington, VT 05403 South Burlington Sample Certificate of Service Form Rev. 1-2012 L. ABBOTT 4 and 6 Birch Lane, Q.C.P. Area zoned R-4 District Section 19.00 Non -conforming uses and structures Section 19.00 Dimensional requirements Minimum 9,500 square foot - 80 feet frontage Existing lots are 25'x40' average size 4 unit apartments and a single family unit Setback approximately 2 feet F.M.V. (City records) #4 Birch Lane (s.f. unit) $ 3,300 #6 Birch Lane (4 plex unit) 14,000 17,300 See list of proposed renovations Estimated cost $53,480 September 13, 1983 Mr. Linwood Abbott 88 Central Avenue, Q.C.P. South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Abbott: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment has granted your request for a zoning variance. The Board will issue fori-,al findings at a later date. This office will issue a permit upon your request. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administrative Officer RW/ncg I , t- � - _ - T2flVtsJS'".;`�-c-'t►�,• AMR - .. � - - - , �; 7` - • �, }r � �.�;��.-- _ � i.,�•�......� � :., ; � � ~ �!S � 'I . -. - I � \ � y�` . :' `•��ll��.► T�P? 1C. �`-��M�'L� �='.� %� i5 � oRa �r X. 7'., Z i, . •ice �..• � �'�.. _.:.-,-:,'. �f-�. _ .-. . = •. � :, - : ,>x>.' � Y., : ' : J j. - - .' _ - - }Ff ^ C "�_« r.S' `�1 x - �- -F`- .. ' L' ��•�, ��."!�A+' ' x_ 'V• .� i -y�3 Y. - ..- r• j { F •t . • 1 a. Y �}}�� . ! f 1.` -a` �,t J, _ _ ,,; � ,�•1 �- i' L - ~` DWI' ,•- •.� •- � ' _ .• -, � • �,- - iin , - '' A'diJ '� -`. , - •- t�.- ... � �a♦'yC.. r'tl�=a -t_ •.�1i '�' .. .. r ...: - , t ff,• ff� s H y � �.r f• ; .� , f --' r - - _ ��C�1;` . ; •. . - _y _ - ' �•_�,-1,• s .Je, - '" , y+` tea., �` - i t re 3 _ . _ _' J '� ` , ._.-r �, '�" �. - _ i,� �/''j)'f[�I`y/a1 .+- _ .ts. • T..? Qt I .� ,_ - ° .% - .h. " _ rid;•• R .. `i °' -, � �+•+••r •.:._... .• f �-^"`...' i *s M�.' ,F' # ]� j�.� �,�-� r _ � r, _ W � � �J j � •� , f •`--•'" �` � .�'' _ , L �43" � �" �t+rlµ` " • -. t -' - _ - r ., - . \ +i �,•_--a � � �y� �.`_ ' ;, 4 5•- •if': �- • r . - _ x • � !' _ J � „ • �i `!�• . / 1 i h 3. • - ` - {{ i "is ��^ „T' .Fs ,� "-� •y.. _-� �' t a. .Y:t h E- M "", F� •� '1m -- � - + I ♦V � ( � k - . w3 t .,'�Y r•yTs _...a•.. •' � Y. * � .. .. � s. '!�•.;.y:_�� K"Y+... � •�_ •i` +'�+: - - „- �' =-"�=� (,ra {31-[7t�tf�-��yc`�e�'"•,�..,._ e.- •'.�n"'_� ��a� •-.« - - - �-�^--w.e� �_ .�, ._ i �j[ p -' (�1 -`� ICJ •• '{ s' • e' r �. f ! r' ►1 "�--` Y r4y , fi f s ' " — w, r i ��_ �- - � '� t ;.. , '''' '_ -�_'�' � ' ! _ •r,, " _ . � jjj .- fi�i.1' ..,�%�f,� �1t•►�y`/. Y• 1 _ ` .ten r_-- ''r�� _ • Y �• q"�.r- � � _f < .. <im ",4-1 -' - , ` � _ di" -�W - � ( r•�y�=-.:-+'+.- - -�' r�� - . _ - .z "< -- F` � ±' 1,"ty �C.a.l�'• -� `�C.r '•w' ';,� _ <y ;� AAte`. :F- r.f� - - v}"<4 �'' .F ay r f'ti- << e " � lr� - "r'Y.•f 4r �= 'L+e•s �.1 `e,j [ - + fW /' . . Yl i-r �}}�� f _ _,'ti" r,�.,�r -' - r ,Y_ _ �6�.�� r� :'' _ r _ iii w + r• f �` j - •"„ � • ~tj � • - _ - - -. - 1e. . v _ • y ._ 33M4_ • —_ -__. ,.�F'•. - _.� r ,�,•*.� 9,,, ' � J �;l�.,r ..# _-Nf:R ,�'. .., f•'x yy� _ , r� - - - _ ' . - - � � ' �"_ _ _...`�- :3 �- ._ .. - - .. _ _ ' fi; -• r• r' per••' - -.. ' - - � - y ,�� R" lt-r-'�T.�• , ^ �'." - ,.._..tea - •. ..S` . - - _ -T _ ' .'R.i k-yy�. • �.... -. _ _ _ . : ... ^ - '_ a'f ~ '~ ` ^ g.s ' . r. - .. T`yr'y -' ...r_. Y �- -^ - . _ .,. - � - _ � - � - • . _ _.. _ '" i 'f +. � f-� r t j}�.+�-.y,� .-yH - __-.ter-....1• l,. �� _ ., n - -_ _ - - ._.... . .. _ � I _ i - -72 . _ ��� •�, _ � . ' 1��/• ; �` L, � , f (� -.. .•yR. L=-h 1._.t _1•.. '...•._..cv ...... �.r .', .. - -'� y I -- - , i• "' � _ - : s* _ ii fY •y f- • • {jr-rYS�'i`, F'_�" _ _ _ "•a`a-"""`. f_ _` . s _ ` _ - _ _ `L;, , � r • -• / -' � � �+ �'i _;r' a, r y l� .ice T y `{ a -•a. „ I z N On Wt-l- a H > )4 Oae 71t s S 3 S-cl txj r --- - - -- -- ---- - - ---- -- - -- --- - August 24, 19-33 To: City of South Burlington "Planning Zoning Commission From: Linwood D. R, `I lizabeth C . r�bbott 3:3 Central Avenue Sout}a Burlington, Vermont 054-01 Subject: Repair and renovation of adjacent structures at 4 and 6 a:),inch Lane, So. Burli.ngt-)n, Vt. Purpose of Repairs: a. i'rovid suitabl, living accomodotions for four families residing :t F) Birch Lan, and on.: family residi_,g at 4 Birch Lane. b. Provide for th.;< neral s<3fety and well-being of these families as p:_=rtains to their dwellings. c. Aesthetically improve the appearance of the structures, ther by enhanc=i.n, the Cenera.l appear- ance of the nei; }ibor-hood and community. The foll.owinv is a list of proposed r novati ns ane) includ(s estimates of the sub -contractors. Carpen i-ry : a. Plumb and level ceiling of garden apartment Tsrith framing according to prints.* Includes all beams, joists and wal.1 framing to insure r)roper stability of structure. Estimated cost: ';'P2,600.00. b. Restore Face of structures to :,�s near to original condition as possible. This includes new railings, st:+irs s n ccssary �)nd removal of shall roof over u per porch and restoration of original trim. I,Stimated cost: ''.0,3on.no. c. Remove and .replace- rear porc'..I� s i!i'Uh pressurc.:- treated lumber_ and flooring. This inc-ludes all. stairs and rail _n�-s as n:-cessa.ry. Estimated cost: #P6,000.00. d. Remove and reulace side -porc< a. d porch roof. Estimated cost: a-G 1 ,7•->00.00. * See attached blueprints. (2) e. Remove and replace r,_ar deck on small house. l_,stimated. cost: 1,3r0.00. f . General. roofing repairs to small house. Estimated cost: 300.00. g. Miscellaneous repairs on small house. Pstimated cost: it 600.00. h. Finish carpentry on both structures including cost of' doors and. �, indows tc be suppli �d by owner. "stimated cost: 21C- 00. i. Total c�3rpcntry extimate: `Jk, 19,030.00. Foundation work: Take out old foundations �.nd replace -F'ootings c.nd new poured concrete walls. Estimc-ted cost: 1�10,000.00. Electrical work: P1F•ase see, attached estimate. r i Plumbing: Plcuase sue attached estimate. Insulation and sheetr.ocking. Cabinetry and i'iisc. ]$3,0(0.00 New A.ppl.isnces: ;- 2,000.00. Total estimated cost of project: t,41,730.00. Respectfully �o�u�rs7,— abeth Abbott August 29, 1983 Mr. Linwood Abbott 88 Central Avenue, Q.C.P. South Burlington, Vermont 05401 Dear Mr. Abbott: Be advised that the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at: the South Burlington City Mall, Conference bloom, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, September 12, 1.983 at 5:00 P.M. to consider your request for a zoning variance. Please plan to attend. Very truly, Richard Ward, Zoning Administriative officer R14/n,cg SOUTH BUlk— ZONING OFFICE In accordance with the South Bur- lington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adlustment will hold a public hearing of the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, S75 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on Monday, September 12, 1993, at 5:00 P.M. to consider the following: I. Appeal of Albert J. Reyes seek. frig approval, from Section 19.35, Removal and filling with earth Products of the South Burlington Regulations. Request Is for per- mission to fill a ravine of approx. Imoteiv 3 acres with 237 feet fron- tage along Route No. 7, with earth material, located northerly of 1693 Shelburne Rood 2 Appeal of Paul Cholnlere seek- Ing a variance, from Section 19.652, Multiple uses and Section 13.20 Conditional uses Of the South Burlington Regulations. Request Is for permission to to construct an addition containing 2690 square feet to on existing 1800 square foot structure and occupy said building as a marine sales and service busi- ness In conlunctlon with a automo- bile sales and service, d.b a. P.J.'s Auto, 2073 Williston Road. 3. Appeal Of Anthony Socinskl seeking a variance, from Section 19.00, Non -conforming uses and structures of the South Burlington Regulations. Request Is for per- mission to construct a 32'x60' addi- tion to the rear of an existing structure, maintaining the easterly side yard at eleven (11) feet on a lot containing approximately 24,000 square feet, at Carl Densmore Company, Inc., 1725 Williston Road. 4. Appeal Of WIINam i Erlols GII- bertson seeking a variance, from Section 9.10, Permitted uses of the South Burlington Regulatfons. Re- quest Is for permission to operate a rooming house, with a maximum of six (6) people from a residential dwelling unit, at 77 Black Lantern Lane. 5 Appeal of Linwood and Eliz- abeth Abbott seeking a variance, from Section 19.00, Non -conform. Ing uses and structures of the South Burlington Regulations. Re. Quest Is for permission to repair and renovate two structures, which are non -conforming to the dimensional requirements, at / and 6 Birch Lone, Queen City Park Richard Ward Zoning Administrative Officer ti27/83 August 27, 19S3 NOTICE OF APPEAL SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT \Name, address and telephone # of applicant { /`'�'7;.r G� i , , a(+ ! ', ^ •! ^ � , r r C lac O-r Name, address of property owner V Property location and description I hereby appeal to the Zoning Board of Adjustment for the following: conditional use, variance or decision of the administrative officer. I understand the meetings are held twice a month (second and fourth Mondays). The legal advertisement must appear a minimum of fifteen (15) days before the hearing. I agree to pay the hearing fee of $30.00 which is to off -set the cost of the hearing. Hearing Date Signature of Appellant Do not write below this line ---------------------------=----------------------------------------------------------- SOUTH BURLINGTON ZONING NOTICE In accordance with the South Burlington Zoning Regulations and Chapter 117, Title 24 V.S.A. the South Burlington Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing at the South Burlington Municipal Offices, Conference Room, 575 Dorset Street, South Burlington, Vermont on at (day of week) (month and date) time to consider the following: _J� Appeal of seeking a from Section �.t Z > d-e•�.. { , + �'.} t �- f"et x,.� ,, of the South Burlington Regulations. Request is for permission to /Lti" p.�t�` [_C -e �,,,.t....�., �,.�'! s.. [ ,LY ' e� C� • 1. /� s f.,