HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0000 Stonehedge Drive (3)ADMINISTRATIVE CHECKLIST
PROJECT NF1•1E/FILE REFERENCE
1. LETTER OF NOTIFICATION & APPROVAL MOTION OR FINDINGS & ORDER
2. BODING OR ESCROW AGREEMENTS (,V�IT- 0 4 rr_5
LAi•IDSCAP ING
S `,Z,7- - D•R DIT. GE
ZO., �DS
CLl:BS
S iDE..P,LKS
(NOTE ALL RELEASES OR AGREEMENT REVISIONS)
3. LIST APPROVALS GRANTED, WITH DATES, AND PERMITS
PECTIONS COMPLETED, ETC.:
4. UTILITY EASF_-AEvTS
RECORDED
ACC .DT=
5. CERTIFICATE OF TITLE x
BILLS OF SALE
6. ROAD;VAYS
DEEDS FOR CITY STREETS ACCEPTED
PRIVATE ROAD & WAIVER AGREEMENT x
[7 -' Im
7. FINAL PLAT OR RECORD COPY - STAMPED .� SIGNED, & FILED OR RECORDED
8. PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTS
ACCEPTED & RECORDED
FILED
9. MISC"Ll,%NEOUS AGRE'-MENTS
LAM FOR ROAD WIDENING
OFFER OF IRREVOCABLE DEDICATION
FUTURE ACCESS POINTS
SY RF.D ACCESS POINTS
OTHER
10. COPY OF SURVEY TO A:.SESSOR (IF CHANGE IN PROPERTY LINES)
11. FEES - PAID ATE
H = I1IG
BU =' D T I G P £?'•° IT
INSP.
R
R CRE.�`=' IO_,I ( ECO '.D C..LCUL:.`I' IO_Z S 1-1m DEPOSIT 171 ACCOU: T )
12. I:'?i.CT 7 C1710 - UP
"Oi LI.i E" Z�%??J:yTIG::: SCHOOL i'IDS CAR COU::TS
VERMONT WARRANTY DEED
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that ADCOM, INC., a Vermont
corporation with principal place of business at South Burlington,
in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantor, in the
consideration of Ten and More ------------------------- Dollars
paid to its full satisfaction by the City of SOUTH BURLINGTON, in
the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont, Grantee, by these
presents do freely give, grant, sell, convey and confirm unto the
said Grantee, City of South Burlington, for itself and its
successors and assigns forever, a certain piece of land in South
Burlington, in the County of Chittenden and State of Vermont,
described as follows, viz:
Beginning at a concrete monument being the southwest corner
of the property herein described, also being the northwest
corner of property now or formerly owned by Mrs. John Nowland
and also being a point in the east property line of Lot
#39 on Yandow Drive in Laurel Hill South Development and
now or formerly owned by Robert A. and Julie S. Lang; thence
from said point of beginning on a magnetic bearing of North
18' 27' 10" East in and along a portion of the said East
property line of Lot #39 and also the entire East property
line of Lot #40 on Yandow Drive in Laurel Hill South Developmerr
and now or formerly owned by Paul A. and Sally Farrar, a
distance of One Hundred Forty Six and Forty Six Hundredths
Feet (146.46') to a concrete monument being the northeast
corner of said Lot #40 and also being the southeast corner
of the east end of Andrews Avenue in Laurel Hill South Develop-
ment; thence continuing on a magnetic bearing of North 18°
27' 10" East in and along the said east end of said Andrews
Avenue a distance of Fifty and One Hundredths Feet (50.0l')
to an iron pipe being the northeast corner of the said east
end of said Andrews Avenue and also being the southeast
corner of Lot #42 on Andrews Avenue in Laurel Hill South
Development and now or formerly owned by Leopold Yandow;
thence continuing on a magnetic bearing of North 18' 27'
10" East in and along the entire east property line of said
Lot #42 for a distance of One Hundred Eleven and Twenty
Two Hundredths Feet (111.22') to a concrete monument being i
the northeast corner of said Lot #42 and also being the
southeast corner of Lot #149 in Laurel Hill Development
and now or prmerly owned by Lee B. r ) Helen N. Maynard;
thence con, -nuing on a magnetic beari,. of North 18' 27'
10" East in and along the entire East property lines of
Lot #149 now or formerly owned by said Lee B. and Helen
N. Maynard, Lot #151 now or formerly owned by Alexander
J. and Nancy Delano, Lot #153 now or formerly owned by George
E. and Lillian M. Killen, and Lot #155 now or formerly owned
by George and Constance Albee for a distance of Four Hundred
Forty One and Ninety Nine Hundredths Feet (441.991) to an
iron pipe being the northeast corner of said Lot #155 and
now or formerly owned by George and Constance Albee and
also being the southeast corner of the east end of a proposed
street named Cranwell Drive in Laurel Hill Development;
thence continuing on a magnetic bearing of North 18' 27'
10" East in and along the said east end of said proposed
street named Cranwell Drive for a distance of Fifty Feet
(50.00') to an iron pipe being the northeast corner of said
proposed street named Cranwell Drive and also being the
Southeast corner of Lot #60 in Laurel Hill Development and
now or formerly owned by Donald and Beverly Tanguay; thence
continuing on a magnetic bearing of North 18' 27' 10" East
in and along the entire east property line of said Lot #60
now or formerly owned by said Donald and Beverly Tanguay
and in and along a portion of the east property line of
Lot #58 now or formerly owned by Robert H. Dumont for a
distance of One Hundred Forty Three and Eighty Four Hundredths
Feet (143.84') to a concrete monument being a point on the
said east property line of said Lot #58 now or formerly
owned by said Robert H. Dumont and also being the southwest
corner of Lot #160 now or formerly owned by Alfred and Catheri:
Gaetani and also being a corner in the west line of the
property herein described; thence deflecting to the right
on a magnetic bearing of South 76' 51' 20" East in and along
the entire South property lines of Lot #160 now or formerly
owned by said Alfred and Catherine Gaetani, Lot #162 now
or formerly owned by David and Tina Lai, Lot #164 now or
formerly owned by Mary W. McLellan, Lot #166 now or formerly
owned by Robert and Karin Larson, Lot #168 now or formerly
owned by Donald and Betty Moser, and a lot with no number
now or formerly owned by Donald and Betty Moser (Lots #160,
162, 164, 166 and 168 are all fronting on the south side
of Oak Hill Drive in Laurel Hill Development) for a distance
of Five Hundred Ninety Nine and Eighty Four Hundredths Feet
(599.84') to a "T" Bar being the southeast corner of the
said lot with no number now or formerly owned by said Donald
and Betty Moser and also being a corner in the west line
of the property herein described; thence deflecting to the
left on a magnetic bearing of North 8° 11' 30" East in and
along the entire east line of the said lot with no number
now or formerly owned by said Donald and Betty Moser for
a distance of Two Hundred and Forty Four Hundredths Feet
(200.44') to a "T" Bar being the northeast corner of said
lot with no number now or formerly owned by said Donald
and Betty Moser and also being a corner in the west line
of the property herein described; thence deflecting to the
-2-
left on a magnetic bearing of North 77' 00' 30" West in
and along e entire north property " e of the said lot
with no nuller now or formerly owned j said Donald and
Betty Moser for a distance of One Hundred Twenty Four and
Fifty Six Hundredths Feet (124.561) to a "T" Bar being the
northwest corner of the said lot with no number now or formerly
owned by said Donald and Betty Moser also being the northeast
corner of aforesaid Lot #168 now or formerly owned by said
Donald and Betty Moser, also being the southeast corner
of the east end of the aforesaid Oak Hill Drive and also
being a corner in the west line of the property herein describe(
thence deflecting to the right on a magnetic bearing of
North 00 50' 43" East in and along the said east end of
said Oak Hill Drive for a distance of Fifty One and Twenty
Four Hundredths Feet (51.24') to a "T" Bar being the northeast
corner of the said east end of said Oak Hill Drive also
being the south east corner of Lot #167 now or formerly
owned by Wallace and Theo Christensen and also being an
angle in the west line of the property herein described;
thence on a magnetic bearing of North 01' 17' 00" East in
and along the entire east property line of said Lot #167
now or formerly owned by said Wallace and Theo Christensen
for a distance of Two Hundred Two and Forty Nine Hundredths
Feet (202.49') to an iron pipe being the northeast corner
of said Lot #167 now or formerly owned by said Wallace and
Theo Christensen also being the southeast corner of the
property now or formerly owned by David and Ramona Boulanger
and also being an angle in the west line of the property
herein described.; thence on a magnetic'bearing of North
13' 52' 14" East in and along a portion of the east property
line of the property now or formerly owned by said David
and Ramona Boulanger for a distance of Two Hundred Forty
Four Feet (244.00') to an iron pipe being an angle in the
said east line of the said property now or formerly owned
by said David and Ramona Boulanger also being a point on
the south property line of the property now or formerly
owned by Urban A. and Charlotte R. Wheelock and also being
the northwest corner of the property herein described; thence
deflecting to the right on a magnetic bearing of South 44'
14' 30" East in and along a portion of the said south property
line of said property now or formerly owned by said Urban
A. and Charlotte R. Wheelock for a distance of Eighty Two
and Forty Four Hundredths Feet (82.44') to a point being
the northwest corner and point of beginning of Phase I Parcel
of Cedar Glen North and also being the northeast corner
of the property herein described; thence leaving the perimeter
boundary of Cedar Glen North and deflecting to the right
on a magnetic bearing of South 13' S2' 14" West in and along
a portion of the west boundary of said Phase I parcel of
Cedar Glen North for a distance of One Hundred Ninety Two
and Seventy Three Hundredths Feet (192.731) to a point being
an angle in the said west boundary of said Phase I Parcel
of Cedar Glen North and also being an angle in the east
property line of the parcel herein described; thence on
a magnetic bearing of South 01' 17' 00" West in and along
a portion of the said west boundary of said Phase I Parcel
of Cedar Glen North for a distance of One Hundred Eighty
Nine and Twenty Five Hundredths Feet (189.25') to a point
-3-
RI9-t4T'
being a cor�} er in the said west boundary of said Phase I
Parcel of Idar Glen North and also ' )ng a corner in the
said east property line of the parcel herein described;
thence deflecting to the left on a magnetic bearing of South
77' 00' 30" East in and along a portion of the south property
line of said Phase I Parcel of Cedar Glen North for a distance
of Eighty Two and Six Hundredths Feet (82.061) to a point
being a corner in the said west boundary line of said Phase
I parcel of Cedar Glen North and also being a corner in
the east property line of the parcel herein described; thence
deflecting to the right on a magnetic bearing of South 8°
11' 30" West in and along a portion of the said west boundary
of said Phase I Parcel of Cedar Glen North for a distance
of Three Hundred Ten and Forty Four Hundredths Feet (310.44')
to a point being a corner in the said west boundary of said
Phase I Parcel of Cedar Glen North and also being a corner
in the east property line of the parcel herein described;
thence leaving said boundary of the Phase I Parcel of Cedar
Glen North and deflecting to the left on a magnetic bearing
of North 760 51' 20" West for a distance of Three Hundred
Twenty Nine and Sixty Two Hundredths Feet (329.62') to a
point being a corner in the east property line of the parcel
herein described; thence deflecting to the left on a magnetic
bearing of South 18' 27' 10" West for a distance of Eight
Hundred Sixty Seven and Sixteen Hundredths Feet (867.16')
to a point in the north property line of property now or
formerly owned by Mrs. John Nowland, also being a point
in the south line of the perimeter boundary of aforesaid
Cedar Glen North, and also being the southeast corner of
the parcel herein described; thence deflecting to the right
on a magnetic bearing of North 83' 43' 00" West in and along
a portion of the said north property now or formerly owned
by Mrs. John Nowland for a distance of Three Hundred Two
and Ninety Hundredths Feet (302.901) to a concrete monument
and point of beginning.
The property herein described lying within the mentioned
bounds contains 7.57 acres be the same more or less.
Being a part of land and premises acquired by the Grantor
herein by warranty deed of Leopold A. Yandow and Irene W.
Yandow dated July 13, 1973, and recorded in Warranty Book
ill, Pages 388-390, of the Land Records of the City of
South Burlington.
This conveyance is subject to and conditioned upon the following
terms and reservations:
1. The natural landscape and foliation and
growth shall not be changed without the
consent of the Grantor, its successors
which consent will not be unreasonably
other natural
written
or assigns,
withheld;
-4-
2. The within Grantor reserves an easement against the
wi n conveyed premises for purpose of cons-
tru�oion and maintenance of utility services necessary
or appropriate to be constructed in connection with
land retained by the within Grantor; said easement
shall be the minimum easement necessary to accomplish
the purpose hereof, the location of which easement
shall be subject to applicable City zoning, sub-
division and other like government laws and regulations.
3. If the Grantee or its successors and assigns, proposes
to develop the within -conveyed premisesfor a play
ground or other recreational purpose as contemplated
by 24 VSA Section 4415 (5), the proposal shall be
presented to the within Grantor, or its heirs and
assigns for review and no construction shall be
commenced without the advice and written approval
of the within Grantor --_-or- its- succ-essorsand assigns,
which shall not`be unreasonably withheld. It is the
intent of -this provision to permit the proposed design
and uses to be as compatible with the adjacent develop-
ment of the Grantor as reasonably possible.
4. The within conveyance is intended and calculated to be
fifteen percent (15%) of the area of the developer's
50.44 acre development known as Cedar Glen North as
provided for by 24 VSA, Section 4415, and is not
intended or calculated to be conveyed in connection
with only that part of said development which is
presently under construction.
To have and to hdld said granted premises, with all the
privileges and appurtenances thereof, to the said Grantee, City
of South Burlington, and its successors and assigns, to their own
I
use and behoof forever; and the said Grantor, ADCOM, Inc., for
itself and its successors and assigns, does covenant with the said
Grantee, City of South Burlington, its successors and assigns,
that until the ensealing of these presents it is the sole owner
of the premises, and have good right and title to convey the same
in manner aforesaid, that they are free from every encumbrance
I
EXCEPT as noted above; and ADCOM, Inc. hereby engages to warrant
-5-
...
and defend th,)same against all lawful _ 1ims whatever, EXCEPT as
noted above.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and seal this
day of October, 1973.
N THE PRESEN OF
c.
A�f.''L�c'.�
STATE OF VERMONT
ADCOM, INC.
By. 4--L"\
Henry P. Potter
Duly Authorized Agent
COUNTY OF CHITTENDEN, SS. {
At Burlington, Vermont, this tlday of October, 1973,
Henry P. Potter, duly authorized agent of ADCOM, INC., personally
appeared and he acknowledged this instrument, by him sealed and
subscribed, to be his free act and deed and the free act and deed
of ADCOM, INC.
Vermont Property Transfer Tax Before me
32 V.S.A. Chap. 231
—ACK1\.'!OW LEDG "vI ENT —
Return Rec'd.-•Tax Pa;d--Cua•d G; Ha•ahli Cert. Rec'd.--
Vt. Land Use & Uecelupm,::t P:ar.s Act ",1. Rec'd.
Return No.3L41 9 y .
Signed Zlerk
Dated Q - 0
NIT
ADCOM INC.
1579 Spear Street
So. Burlington, Vermont 05401
Tel. $02 864-6479
March 24, 1977
South Burlington Planning Commission
City Hall
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Att: Mr. Steven Page
Re: Cedar Glen North Park Area
Dear Mr Page:
f
Our main concern -with the 7.6 acres donated for the park
has been removal of trees_ We always thought that the trees
would help in some way to create a natural barrier between
Laurel Hill and Cedar Glen North. We would be agreeable to
allowing the city of South Burlington to use the donated land
as they see fit, but we would like to suggest that there be
some kind of natural barrier between Cedar Glen North and the
Recreation Area.
We would also agree to present any modifications of the
site plan for the approved 92 units for review by the Planning
Commission. We don't anticipate any change in the next 21 units
which comprise Cluster G and H which has been reviewed in detail
by the Planning Commission and Cluster A which is similar to
Cluster C except that there will be sufficient driveway depth
to enable at least two car per unit.
As development plans proceed beyond this point for the
balance of the 92 units, we will gladly come before you.
Sincerely,
Henry Potter for
Adcom, Inc.
HP:dc
16 & 20 Oak Hill Drive
South Burlington
March 20, 1977
To: Steve Page
From: Bob & Karin Larson, Don & Betty Moser
abutters to the Cedar Glen North property
Subject: information for the City's consideration in relation to'
the : Distri-dt'!.EnvironmentAT . Comm -is sion review of Henry
Potterfs action to allow children to reside in his
development
1. Do the Phase I land boundaries of the area in which Mv. Potter
now wishes to permit children to reside still conform to the
boundaries approved by the Commission on May 4' 1973?
2. Is there to be any significant change in the design of the
units in order to accommodate children?
3. Will there now be a need for walkways along the private
roads in order to insure the safety of children walking to
the cul-de-sac to get the school bus?
4• Will additional units impact to any degree on the surface
drainage problem as this relates to run-off flowing toward
Cranwell and Andrews Avenues and the City owned parkland?
�. Will. the addition of children place more demands on the
adjoining City owned park than was anticipated when the
development was to house adults only? If so, should additional
park space be offered to the City for purchase?
6. Before proceeding with more units, should Mr. Potter be
required to clean up construction material scattered around
the area from the original construction in 1973 .an from
subsequent developmen? Some of this debris was the cause
* of thi,March 14, 77 plugging of the drainage way between the
Potter. land.and the City park which led to the City having to
send a machine to excavate the ditch to relieve potential
flooding onto Laurel Hill Drive. Also, dumping of hay and
ya'd clippings has led to a definite fire hazard in the warm
weather. Mast summerve called Mr. Potter is son about a. large
hay pile which was a ready target for kids with matches. He
went up and spread the hay around but never removed it.
cc: C. Carter, Dist, Envir, Comm.
P. Farrar, Chm, City Council
ADCOM INC.,�� w "'
1579 Spear Street 4
So. Burlington, Vermont 05401 / f
Tel. 802 864-6479
March 24, 1977
South Burlington Planning Commission
City Hall
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Att: Mr. Steven Page
Re: Cedar Glen North Park Area
Dear Mr. Page:
Our main concern with the 7.6 acres donated for the park
has been removal of trees. We always thought that the trees
would help in some way to create a natural barrier between
Laurel Hill and Cedar Glen North. We would be agreeable to
allowing the city of South Burlington to use the donated land
as they see fit, but we would like to suggest that there be
some kind of natural barrier between Cedar Glen North and the
Recreation Area.
We would also agree to present any modifications of the
site plan for the approved 92 units for review by the Planning
Commission. We don't anticipate any change in the next 21 units
which comprise Cluster G and H which has been reviewed in detail
by the Planning Commission and Cluster A which is similar to
Cluster C except that there will be sufficient driveway depth
to enable at least two car per unit.
As development plans proceed beyond this point for the
balance of the 92 units, we will gladly come before you.
Sincerely,
Henry Potter for
Adcom, Inc.
HP:dc
No Text
LAW OFFICES OF
SPOKES & OBUCHOWSKI
86 ST. PAUL STREET
BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
September 16, 1977
John T. Ewing
Burlington Savings Bank
148 College Street
Burlington, Vermont 05401
1.?.e: Cedar Glen North (Potter) -South Burlington
Dear John:
I understand a copy of a memorandum was given to you concerning
the status of Cedar Glen North. The memorandum was from
Bill Szymanski and directed to interested parties. Unfortunately,
the memoranduia was intended as a working draft for city
officials. After review and input from Bill Szymanski, Dick
Ward, Steve Page and myself the draft was to be revised for
public distribution.
The memorandum you have does not accurately reflect the
legal status of the development, and therefore should not be
relied upon. We hope to have a new memorandum available by
O September 23, 1977, and a copy will be immediately sent to
you. I would be pleased to discuss the contents of that
memorandum with you once you have had a chance to study it.
Very truly yours,
Richard A. Spokes
RAS/tb
cc: Richard Ward
Steven Page
LAW OFFICES OF
SPOKES & OBUCHOWSKI
86 ST. PAUL STREET
BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
September 16, 1977
James Wick, Esq.
Dinse, Allen & Erdmann
156 College Street
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Cedar Glen North (Potter) -South Burlington
Dear Jim:
I understand a copy of a memorandum was given to you concerning
the status of Cedar Glen North, The memorandum was from
Bill Szymanski and directed to interested parties. Unfortunately,
the memorandum was intended as a working draft for city
officials. After review and input from Bill Szymanski, Dick
Ward, Steve Page and myself the draft was to be revised for
public distribution.
0 The memorandum you have does not accurately reflect the
legal status of the development, and therefore should not be
relied upon. We hope to have a new memorandum available by
September 23, 1977, and a copy will be immediately sent to
you. I would be pleased to discuss the contents of that
memorandum with you once you have had a chance to study it.
Very truly yours,
Richard A. Spokes
RAS/tb
cc: Richard Ward
Steven Page
M E M 0 R A N D U M
To: Interested Parties
From: City of South Burlington
Re: Status of Cedar Glen North Development
Date: 9/19/77
The purpose of this memo is to describe the status of the
Cedar Glen North Development, with regard to local approvals and
building permits.
I General Information
The project consists of 220 condominium units on approximately
50 acres and has received preliminary approval. 7.5 acres have
been deeded to the city as parkland. A building permit for 92
units has been issued, of which 21 have been built.
A cul-de-sac, with storm drains and water main has been
constructed and accepted by the city. Sewer and water mains, plus
service lines to existing units, have been installed on the north
enc, of the property; there mains have not yet been inspected or
accepted by the city.
The layout of some roads and buildings has been modified,
with the consent of the Planning Commission, since the original
Memorandum
To: Interested Parties
9 /19 /77
Page 2
approval was granted. A plan is on file at City Hall, showing
the location of all buildings and site improvements as approved.
II Phase I (92 units) Approval
The permit outstanding (for 71 units) is valid only for the
building types and locations shown on the plan of record, provided
there are no major modifications. Major modifications would include,
among other things, rearrangement of roads or substantial paved areas,
larger units, more bedrooms per unit, or relocation of units.
Further construction in this phase is subject to an informal
review by the Planning Commission, on a cluster by cluster basis.
Landscaping has been installed only
in cluster "C" and must be completed for the "hillside" units.
Easements and bills of sale for the sewer and water mains
must be submitted to the city.
The following condition$ are contained in the findings of
fact as amended by the District Environmental Commission on April
15, 1977:
i
Memorandum
To: Interested Parties
9/19/77
Page 3
1) The construction rate for the balance of Phase I shall not
exceed 18 units for calendar 1977 and 53 units for calendar 1978,
2) The developer shall remove all restrictions on the use of the
parkland to which he is a party.
A private road and waiver agreement will be required for all
private streets, to protect the city from owning or maintaining
these streets until they are upgraaect to current municipal design
and construction standards.
,erformance bonds or a suitable escrow agreement must be
executed to guarantee the installation of landscaping, sewer, water,
storm drainage, and related site improvements which have not yet
been completed to the city's satisfaction.
III 'Balance of the nroiect (128 units)
Subdivision approval for this portion of the project has ex-
pired. Further development plans for this portion of the property
are subject to major subdivision review under the municipal subdivision
regulations.
Memorandum
To: Interested Parties
9/19/77
Page 4
The engineering inspection fee for this portion of the project
has been paid.
No parkland dedication or equivalent fee shall be reauired in
light of the 7.5 acres of parkland previously dedicated.
LAW OFFICES OF
SPOKES & OBUCHOWSKI
86 ST. PAUL STREET
BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
September 16, 1977
John T. Ewing
Burlington Savings Bank
148 College Street
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Cedar Glen North (Potter) -South Burlington
Dear John:
I understand a copy of a memorandum was given to you concerning
the status of Cedar Glen North. The memorandum was from
Bill Szymanski and directed to interested parties. Unfortunately,
the memorandum was intended as a working draft for city
officials. After review and input from Bill Szymanski, Dick
Ward, Steve Page and myself the draft was to be revised for
public distribution.
The memorandwu you have does not accurately reflect the
legal status of the development, and therefore should not be
relied upon. We hope to have a new memorandum available by
September 23, 1977, and a copy will be Liunediately sent to
you. I would be pleased to discuss the contents of that
memorandum with you once you have had a chance to study it.
Very truly yours,
Richard A. Spokes
RAS/tb
cc: Richard Ward
Steven Page
LAW OFFICES OF
SPOKES & OBUCHOWSKI
86 ST. PAUL STREET
BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
September 16, 1977
James Wick, Esq,
Dinse, Allen & Erdmann
156 College Street
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Cedar Glen North (Potter) -South Burlington
Dear Jim:
I understand a copy of a memorandum was given to you concerning
the status of Cedar Glen i4orth, The memorandum was from
Bill Szymanski and directed to interested parties. Unfortunately,
the memorandum was intended as a working draft for city
officials. After review and input from Bill Szymanski, Dick
Ward, Steve Page and myself the draft was to be revised for
public distribution.
The memorand= you have does not accurately reflect the
0 legal status of the development, and therefore should not be
relied upon. We hope to have a new memorandum available by
Septeuti.)er 23, 1977, and a copy will be ilamediately sent to
you. I would be pleased to discuss the contents of that
memorandum with you once you have had a chalice to study it.
Very truly yours,
Richard A. Spokes
RAS/tb
cc: Richard Ward
Steven Page
C �
�Aq
Af
`�44
r
� o
� VS�w�cz I..IKr�
7.57
�1& ®15f 2z-lo
� 45'?� (�14�7o r�
s'0 73
Lt�fa--�
MEM QRANDTJM
TO: SOUTH BURLIIZ TON PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: RICHARD WARD
RE: CEDAR GLEN NORTH DEVELOPMENT
DATE: OCTOBER 24, 1975
About March 1973 Cedar Glen North, Spear Street received
approval by the Planning Commission and City Council for con-
struction of 92 condominium units, Phase I & II.
To date sixteen (16) units have been completed, these
are located in the north-west corner of the development.
These units are designed as one story, varying from one
to four-plex units.
The revised plan is the construction of an additional
sixteen (16) units of a town house two story design.
Eight of the units are located in Phase II and eight in
phase IV, north-east corner of the development. The revised
plan is a decrease in density.
The private road and utilities are being installed in the
area planned for these units.
Phase II as shown of the reviised plan is located within
the area designed as phase IV, be advised that -phase III was
not considered in the original application, however the study
plan did show the entire development.
The Commission stipulated that Mr. Potter return for approval
of all other phases.
':is application requires approval by the Commission under
the Planned Residential Development provisions of the zoning
ordinance and also because the original development concept is
now being revised.
SIDE NOTE: In discussing the plan revision with Attorney Spokes
and both of us being informed of
it is my understanding that the
an adult community should not be
sion if school age children are
should be concerned.
the change in the covenants
fact that this is no longer
a consideration of the Commis -
allowed than the Commission
State Of v'ermont
Department of Fish and Game
Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation
Department of Water Resources
Environmental Hoard
Division of Environmental Engineering
Division of Environmental Protection
Division of Planning
Natural Resources Conservation Council
Mr. Henry P. Potter
Adcom Inc.
1579 Spear Street
South Burlington,
Dear Mr. Potter:
AGENCY OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERV'xrION
DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL COMMISSION
111 West Street
Essex Junction, VT 05452
September 30, 1976
Vermont 05401
Please accept my apologies for not getting back to you
sooner on your proposed introduction of children into Cedar
Glen North. The Commission did briefly discuss the issue
and determined that they would need some information from the
City of South Burlington on the ability of the City to provide
educational services. If you could contact the school department
and get some letter from them on the potential impact, the
Commission will review your proposed change.
Submit the letter to me and I will meet as soon as possible
with the Commission and will inform you of the outcome. Call
me if you have any questions on this.
S cerely,—
Curtis W. C 'er
Environmental Coordinator
CWC:mis
FA
COV
7z),