HomeMy WebLinkAboutBATCH - Supplemental - 0000 Stonehedge Drive (6)N
r Stag of Vermont
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Department of Forests, Parks and Recreation
Department of Environmental Conservation
March 29, 2000
Bonnie Spencer
Bergeron, Paradis & Fitzpatrick, LLP
P.O. Box 174
Essex Junction, VT 05403
Dear Bonnie:
AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Department of Environmental Conservation
Wastewater Management Division.
111 West Street
Essex Junction, Vermont 05452
Telephone #(802) 879-5656
Subject: Certification of Compliance #4C0103-8, Cluster H of Stonehedge Condominiums,
Spear Street, South Burlington, Vermont.
This letter is in response to our discussion on March 29, 2000 regarding Condition #5 of the
above subject Certification of Compliance. The Wastewater Management Division no longer reviews
or approves interior waste and water distribution plumbing for public buildings as that responsibility
has been transferred to the Department of Labor & Industry. Therefore, this office will not request
compliance with Condition #5 of Certification of Compliance #4C0103-8.
Please contact me at 1-802-879-5675 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Ernest P. Christianson
Regional Engineer
copies: City of South Burlington
No Text
Ztl� +3urlington Nire Dep. Iment;
575 Dorset #treet
*out4 Burlington. Uermont 054111 1 f�
OFFICE OF
JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR.
CHIEF
863.6455
June 16,1985
Ms. Jane Bechtel City Planner
City Of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Ms. Bechtel,
On Wednesday June 15,1985 I had a meeting with
Mr. Lance Llewllyn on cluster M-N$J of Stonehedge
development. Through our meeting changes were made
to cluster M & N to better fit the needs of the
department for fire protection.
At this time I feel with the changes made we
are beter able to give fire protection. If you have
any questions please feel free to call me.
S#cerely
games W. Goddette Sr.
Chief
4 )W4 +'Surlington Nire utpuAmPnt
f 575 Dorset #treet
*out4 Nurlington, Uermont 05401
OFFICE OF
JAMES W. GODDETTE, SR.
CHIEF
863-6455
May 3,1984
Mr. Richard Ward Acting Planner
City Of So. Burlington
575 Dorset Street
So. Burlington, VErmont 05401
Dear Mr. Ward,
Plans were reviewed by this department on Cluster I & L at
stonehedge development. At this time I do not see a problem with
the building location but there is a problem with the location
of the hydrants. Corrections have been made for the proper location
on the plan for cluster I marked project No. 8143 Dated Mar. 1984.
I would like a set of the plans for my office.
If you have any questions please feel free to call me.
Sincerely
'0- zakjtf
ames W. Goddette Sr.
Chief
December 20, 1985
Mery Brown
Stonehedqe Drive
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Merv;
It has been brought to my attention that your construction crews
have removed a very large, old tree on the east of building J17
in Stonehedge. The tree was designated on the plan to be
retained. While is is impossible to do anything at this point
to satisfactorily remedy the situation, I am asking you to
plant a substantial tree in its place. Furthermore, due to a
significant number of infractions such as this, from this point
forward, I will be asking all site plan and subdivision
applicants to clearly designate which trees will. be saved.
Sincerely,
Jane B. Lafleur,
City Planner
JBLjmcp
cc: Richard Ward, Zoning Administrator
Sonny Audette, Tree Warden
City of South Burlington
WATER DEPARTMENT
400 DORSET STREET
SOUTH BURLINGTON. VERMONT 05401
TEL. 864-4361
August 20, 1985
Mr. Mery Brown C E V E
Glenwood Corporation R E
Stonehedge Drive 4.rCIO
South Burlington, Vermont 05401 ;j
MANAGERS OFFICE
Re: Cluster B Stonehedge CITY, So. E+URLINGTON
Dear Mr. Brown;
Since I sent a crew down early in July to lower curb boxes,
we have had several calls requesting that the curb stops be set
to grade. After that experience I found that the Water Department
is not responsible for the line in the clusters at Stonehedge.
We are responsible only for the mains in the streets.
We found that the service lines into the individual units
were not installed as designed. I have enclosed a copy of the
designed service connection and sketched what is actually in the
ground. The problem with the existing service connection is that
when the curb box is at the bottom of its adjustment a load or
impact on the curb box above ground will break the 2" PVC tee.
This is what happened when one of my people used a hammer to lower
a curb box which was almost to grade. The proper way to adjust
the curb box now is to pull the box up to its maximum adjust-
ment, cut the box off as close to the ground as possible allowing
room to rethread the box for the cap. Then the cap can be
pushed back down so that the cap is flush with the ground. Even
if the curb box is flush with the ground if there is no adjustment
left in the box a vehicle driven up on the box could cause a
break.
If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance
please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
SOUTH BURLIN�GGTON WATER DEPARTMENT
Robert Perkins
Superintendent
CC: Robert Gardner
William Szymanski
r v r✓ f
e CI I Il
tuJ l"�/.Q C a i / pOX
p r. t' !- eS �r+sir
�17))r c—Cl %l�rJ/wit
r
1
f
^,�k, b
i
N ,
Lxd�m 07f4A1 w NOTEQ
SAW
y f
,
,r
1
��A
'R¢.Vle ) CL�sto:�o J, N\," )
rwt b
6�,�tb &-k� aJ\, 9
I�
w��.,c9- ?
C N s
vk Spote,o + Chf�o rtS I (o
co u (.,Ax
V
11, -&PdLC40e
W�
C 1 LKt)AG o o H 0 4 3 = Ll 3 tea,
a 4 3 e &.UA { ao ca&fat = q y -va cc.- d �,
C�v-tru.
1 0l c
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Engineering and Planning Services
The Kiln • 15 Brickyard Road • Essex Junction • Vermont • 05452 • (802) 878-3000
5 June 1985
Ms. Katherine Vose
District Coordinator
District #4 Environmental Commission
111 West Street
Essex Junction, Vermont 05452
RE: Stonehedge Condominiums
Clusters J,M, & N
FILE: 8143
Dear Ms. Vose:
As previously discussed, we are submitting seven (7) sets of
construction drawings and Land Use Permit Amendment forms.
These represent the last three clusters to be completed under
the Stonehedge Lard Use Permit.
We would appreciate consideration at your earliest convenience.
Please call if there is additional information required. Thank you.
Sincerely,
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Lance ,A. L1 ewel�n, P.E.
LAL:amo
cc Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission
City of South Burlington
South Burlington Planning Commission
Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Engineering and Planning Services
The Kiln • 15 Brickyard Road • Essex Junction • Vermont • 05452 • (802) 878-3000
30 May 1985
Ms. Jane Bechtel
City Planner
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont OE401
RE: Stonehedge Clusters "J", "M" & "N"
FILE: 8143
Dear Ms. Bechtel:
As per our previous discussion we are enclosing two (2) sets of ccnstruction
drawings for Stonehedge Clusters "J", "M" & "N". The landscaping plans
will be submitted next week.
We ask that these be reviewed at your earliest convenience so that, with
approval, construction may begin as soon as possible.
Please call if there are any questions. Thanks again.
Sincerely,
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Lanc A. Llew �;
yn, P.E.
LAL:amo
Design 0 Inspection 0 Studies 9 Permitting
July 12, 1984
Lance Llewellyn
Fitzpatrick -Llewellyn Association
15 Brickyard Road
Essex Junction, Vermont U5452
Re: Stonehedge Phase 2 - Tennis Court Addition
Dear Lance:
I hve reviewed and approved the proposed plan for the addition of a
second tennis court adjacent to the previously approved court in
the common area of the Stonehedge Condominium development. It is
my understanding that the two courts will be within one fence, and
the pool will be fenced in separately.
Sincerely,
Jane S. Bechtel,
City Planner
JSB/mcg
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Engineering and Planning Services
The Kiln • 15 Brickyard Road • Essex Junction • Vermont • 05452 • (802) 878-3000
3 July 1984
Ms. Jane Bechtel
City Planner
City of South Burlington
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
RE: Stonehedge Phase 2
Tennis Court Addition
FILE: 8438
Dear Ms. Bechtel:
As discussed previously, Glenwood Corporation (Mervin Brown) wishes to add
a second tennis court in Phase 2. The placement of this court would be
immediately adjacent to the previously approved court, with both contained
within one fenced -in area. The land is part of the Common Area as shown on
the attached plans(FitzPatrick-Llewellyn Drawings D-1010 and D-1026).
Please contact us if additional information is required. We are anxious to
have the courts constructed and appreciate your attention in this matter.
Sincerely,
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Lance- . Llewe yn, P.E.
LAL:amo
cc Mervin Brown
Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting
June 18, 1984
Mr. Lance Llewellyn
Fitzpatrick- Llewellyn Associates
15 Brickvard Road
Essex Junction, Vermont 05452
Dear Lance,
I have reviewed the "Site and Utilities Plans" for Stonehedge
Condominiums, Cluster "I" and "L", and find them acceptable.
These have also been reviewed by Fire Chief Goddette and City
Engineer Bill Szymanski, who see no major problems.
As we discussed, the minimum setback requiremnt from the PUD
perimeter is 50 feet. Furthermore, Chief Goddette strongly
recommends a distance of 65` maximum from the road to the ridge
of,the building for adequate fire protection. The distance bet-
ween structure should be 30 feet or more. Please call me if
you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Jane S. Bechtel,
City Planner
JSB/mcg
cc: Mery Brown
F04
May 31, 1983
Attornev Carl Lisman
191 College Street
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Carl,
In response to your. May117, 1983 letter concerning water and sewer easements
for Phase I of Stonehedge, I have discussed the situation with representatives
of the Stonehedge :�omeowners' Association and have the following convhmts. It
appears that the homeowners will have no problem in granting the appropriate
utility easement extensions, however, they do not wish to pay the cost of
preparing the legal documents. Since I still feel that the problem was created
by the developer and/or his representatives I concur with the homecmners' position.
If you agree to prepare the necessary dOCILTents and forward them+ to me, I
will ?rake the necessary arrangements with the honmers. I believe this may be
the best way to finally resolve this situation. Please let nie know if this is
acceptable to you.
As a final conwent, I am happy to say that all other Stone -hedge legal
documents have been recorded and/or stored in the Clerk's office. I plan to
bind all the correspondence on this matter in a booklet to serve as a shining
example of the finest of municipality -developer relationships.
Sincerely,
David li. Spitz,
City Planner
DHS/rreg
cc: Mery Brown
Nancy McC:lary
DS
11/27/79
STIPULATIONS AND/OR FACT FINDING
STONEHEDGE. PHASE II
For the Final Plat application of the Glenwood Corporation for a 109
unit condominium project, as depicted on a plan entitled "Stonehedge
Condominiums Phase 2, 109 units", last revised 11/16/79, prepared by
Ronald O'Bryan.
Stipulations:
1. Detailed site information for each cluster - including finished building
grades, drainage, sewer, water and road details, walkways aV ether in-
formation - shall be provided prior to the issuance of any � �'�permit for
that cluster. If the layout of buildings, parking areas and/or sewer and
water lines in any cluster has been significantly modified, the plan shall be
resubmitted for revised final plat approval.
Wb ltG
2. Wherever sewer or water mains are located outside of the proposed street
right-of-way, easements 20 feet in width shall be provided to the City, in
form and content satisfactory to the City Attorney.
3. Sewer capacity at the Imperial Drive bottleneck shall be gauged prior to
construction of the 70th unit. No subsequent building permit shall be issued
until provision is made for adequate sewage flow through the bottleneck.
4. The stipulations of William Szymanski's memo, dated November 21, 1979,
shall apply.
5. The Final Plat shall be recorded. within 90 days.
P
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: David Spitz, City Planner
Re: Next Week's Agenda Items
Date: 11/21/79
#2 Windridge Apartments at 200 Kennedy Drive
Sidewalk has been relocated at the fill area to a distance of 4 feet from
the road. Culvert beneath additional fill will be extended as*needed. Ill-
uminated sign has been added at the entrance to the property.
#3 Stonehedge, Phase II
Plans for loop road have been upgraded to a 24' paved width and 30' base.
Minor revisions must be made, such as reducing the sharpness of curves (by in-
creasing curve radii from 150' to 200'), so that loop road may be acceptable
as a city street.
Second entrances have been added to several clusters as requested by fire
chief to improve accessibility for fire fighting.
#4 McDonald's at 1225 Williston Road
City Attorney's opinion is that McDonald's proposed lease of land from the
Citgo station will increase the degree of nonconformity of the Citgo lot in
violation of the City's zoning regulation. Therefore the City Attorney re-
commends denial of the application.
#5 South Burlington Realty, San Remo Drive
On November 22 1977, the Planning Commission gave site plan approval for
a gymnastics instructional facility at this site. For that type of use a
circular drive was required. However, for the currently proposed warehouse -
commercial building with limited traffic and no children involved, a circular
drive no longer appears necessary
Zoning Board has granted variance to allow fifty foot setback with stip-
ulationr that uses be those permitted in the BPD zone and that parking spaces
be 14 as shown. If applicant requests a conditional use, he must return for
Zoning Board review.
Loading dock is in front with sufficient setback for any trailer trucks to
be off the street when unloading. Drainage is towards the front of the lot.
Applicant has left room in parking lot for connection to adjacent undeveloped
lot.
#6 Dubois, 1 lot Subdivision
Proposed new lot is located on the west side of Hinesburg Road across the
road from other lots previously subdivded by Dubois. Lot has 203' road frontage
and a depth of 2175, considerably greater than the 5 to 1 length to width
guideline of Section 402 of the Subdivision Regulations.
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager
Re: Next Week's Agenda Items
Date: 11/21/79
#2 WindridQe
1. Plan layout is acceptable.
#3 Stonehedge 9
1. Road curve radii shall be a minimum of 200 feet and superelevated.
2. Curbs should be constructed in the inside of curves at 15' from center
line to protect road edge.
3. Opening at cul-du-sac should be 30' in width with radii curbed.
#5 South Burlington Realty, San Remo Drive
1. Surface drainage should be intercepted and discharged to the street
storm drainage system. No surface or roof drainage should be allowed to dis-
charge onto adjacant properties.
2. Curb opening shall be constructed with concrete depressed curbing.
#6 Homer Dubois Subdivision, Hinesburg Road
1. This is a subdivision of a large parcel of land on a road that carries
heavy truck traffic. Road opening should be carefully planned. It would be ..
my preference to see a plan developed for Mr. Dubois's entire parcel with con-
sideration given for future streets and a single road access to Hinesburg Road
possibly opposite to the R.O.W. that is reserved for a future street when the
east side was sub -divided several years ago.
#7 Gregory& Daughters, Industral Park, Williston Road
1. A turnaround should be provided.
2. A street R.O.W. should be reserved for future continuation of the street
to the R.D.R. property.
3. State Highway permit will be required for access to Williston Road.
4. Sewage disposal will have to be on site unless a pumping station is
installed with a force main to the existing gravity system.
NBo0
5
41cm inc.
ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
PHASLNG SCHEDULE, STOI`ZEf-IEDGE
(201 Units Total)
Phase I Cluster
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
MAX. BUILD OUT RATE: 25 Units - FY 80
24 Units - FY 81
TOTAL Units
159 Pearl Street
Essex Junction, Vermont 05452
(802) 879-6567
November 19, 1979
a` of Dwelling Units
8
16
15
(Complete)
16
16
(Underway)
9
(Complete)
12
(Underway)
92
units (43 built or
under construction)
Phase 2 Cluster # of Dwelling Units
(In Construction Sequence) J 19
H 12
I 19
K 14
M 16
N 9
L 20
TOTALS: 109 Units
MAX BUILD OUT RATE: 40 units - FY 80
40 units - FY 81
29 units - FY 82
TOTAL 109 Units
TOTAL BUILD OUT RATE: 65 limits - FY 80
64 units - FY 81
29 units - FY 82
Project Balance 138 units
Randolph, Vermont Essex Junction, Vermont Concord, New Hampshire
DS
11/13/79
STIPULATIONS AND/OR FACT FINDING -
STONEHEDGE. PHASE II
For the Final Plat application of the Glenwood Corporati.on for a 109
unit condominium project, as depicted on a plan entitled "Stonehedge
Condominiums Phase 2, 109 Units", dated 10/18/79 and prepared by Ronald
O'Bryan.
Stipulations:
1. Detailed site information for each cluster - including finished building
grades, drainage, sewer, water and road details, walkways and other in-
formation - shall be provided prior to the issuance of any zoning permit
for that cluster. If the layout of buildings, parking areas and/or sewer and
water lines in any cluster has been significantly modified, the plan shall be
resubmitted for revised final plat approval.
Walks y shall b ovided t o -bout evelo to th�pu lic s
n a tion to the propose li age be en bui _is and\par-king ar s.�
3. Easements for the sewer and water mains shall be provided to the City,
in form and content satisfactory to the City Attorney, and shall be marked
on the plat.
4. Location of all buildings, points of access, watermains and hydrants
shall receive final approval from the City Fire Chief. If the location of any of
the above items is signficantly modified, the plan shall be resubmitted for
revised final plat approval.
5.
The Final Plat shall be recorded within 90 days.
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: David Spitz, City Planner
Re: Agenda Items for 11/13/79
Date: 11/9/79
#2 Blanchard Subdivision at 162 East Terrace
Proposed lot meets zoning requirements for the R4 zone sufficient lot
size for a single family house or duplex, sufficient setbacks from the existing
house, and sufficient frontage for both lots. In order to meet these requirements
irregular lot lines have been created. The Zoning Board will consider the re-
quest for a duplex at their November 26 meeting.
#3 Windridge Apartments at 200 Kennedy Drive
The easement to the adjacent property for secondary or emergency access -has
been shown on the plat. Legal aspects of the easement should be reviewed.
Sidewalks: The Natural Resources Committee has recommended that no filling
into the C-0 district take place for purposes of building a sidewalk. Applicant
has proposed a peastone footpath with 2 footbridges across the streams to be
located outside of the street right-of-way. Because of the footbridges and the
steepness of the path at points the City will not be able to maintain the footpath.
However, the possibility of an easement for public access with no maintenance
reasponsibilities should be reviewed.
Watermain layout has been approved.
Stonehedge, hase II
Engineering data on individual clusters is incomplete. Certain cluster re-
locations may take place if a planned land swap occurs in connection with a
recreational grant that the City is seeking. Details on finished building grades,
drainage, sewer elevations, walkways and other items will be presented prior
to construction of each individual cluster.
Roadway status remains to be determined. Applicant requests private,
City Manager wants public. Proposed streets are 20' paved width with swails
for drainage. Details for the road base are equivalent to public streets. If
public streets are required, building setbacks should be addressed.
Walkways should be provided throughout the development to the public street
in addition to the proposed linkage between buildings and parking lots.
Cluster "M" has been relocated to maintain existing trees.
Easements for public sewer and water mains should be provided.
Review by fire chief is incomplete.
#5 McDonalds at 1225 Williston Road
City attorney's opinion is that McDonalds' proposed lease of land from the
Citgo station will increase the degree of nonconformity of the Citgo lot in
violation of the City's zoning regulation. Therefore the City Attorney re-
commends denial of the application.
r-
�-, v ���,���' � i ,fs� ` ���J G•,l':N-�Gl.t ,�� Cti'.;iali-=C—�° \\ �jC
Zr/Z" 16ITU/,-,. Fwo-4ca ( I'/z" e%w-f- cx—x �./ 1" r1i-41�iH)
Gt�T
Novemh,:x 9. 1979
sir, Steve
Dubois &. King Inc,
159 Pearl Street
E,sn-x Junction, Vermont 05452
Re: Stonehedge Condociinjurns, Phacu .2'
Plans date4 October 18s 1979
Dear Steve:
I have reviewed the referced plans end have ria dt�.. a f.^-w note,- which
will clarify approval, Ilowevers, thirty daryt3 prior to construction I
would recuire SuUmisziaO of a act of constructico. drawings for
a
approval. I also would require a preconstruction conference with you
and the contractor in atteadonce,
At the time the last cluster is built than the 811 main shall b-, loonp-tl
back into the existint 8t, Inter main.
Sincerely,
Robert L. Gardner
Superintendent
Rc. / sy
Edward Make
William Szrmanski
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: William J. Szymanski, City Manager
Re: Stonehedge
Date: 11/9/79
1. Loop road should be a public street.
J2. Sewer layout is acceptable.
3. Construction plans shall be submitted for review prior to any building
or site work.
5.
PLANNING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 5. 1979
developer could make the improvements and maintain it. Mr. Woolery did not want
that access open until the Commission, City Engineer,aand Fire and Police Chiefs
could agree on how to handle it. Mr. O'Bryan felt the abutting development could
maintain the easement since it was so short on this developer's side. Mr. Mona
felt the note on the drawing relating to the access should be removed. It was
suggested that there be a simple recording of the right of way. Nx. Poger said
the easement should be provided as the City Attorney suggests.
Mr. Page said they had looked at the two nearest sigrallized intersections to
this project - Williston Road and Kennedy Drive, and Hinesburg Road and Kennedy
Drive. He said that traffic consultant Bruce Houghton's analysis of the capacity
of those intersections is based on a one hour count on January 9.: The applicants
observed the intersection themselves for 4,112 hour periods and found it not to be
as congested as Mr. Houghton suggests. Mr. Page noted that they had not calculated
the capacity or the range of service. Mr. Woolery noted that this development
would not affect the left turn movement from Hinesburg Road onto Kennedy but said
it would affect the left turn off Williston Road onto Kennedy, both of which
movements are at high capacities according to Mr. Houghton. It was suggested that
left turn arrows be put in place before the application was approved. ter. Page
felt the intersections were not at level D. At Hinesburg Road, he said they
looked at 41 cycles and no car waited through a signal change to get through.
The average was 4 cars through during a cycle, the maximum was 8, and 10; of the
cycles had no traffic going through. The traffic study for the project, done by
Land Plan Inc. shows that only one car will come from the Williston -Kennedy
intersection, where 'Mr. Houghton shows it is not lower than level C service.
Tor. Woolery felt this developer was putting an exceptionally costly sidewalk
in and he felt left turn arrows were an imposition on top of that cost.
Yx. Mona moved to continue the public hearing on the final plat application
of L.T.H. Associates for a 17 unit apartment project at 200 Kennedy Drive to
two weeks from tonight, November 27, at City Hall, at 7:30 pm. Mr. Ewing seconded
the motion and it carried with Messrs. Jacob and Woolery voting no.
Public hearing on final plat a nlication of the Glenwood Corporation,) for Phase
II 10 condominium units of the Stonehed a development.
Mr. Page said the area in question was 43 acres, of which 7 were deeded to
the City for parkland. It is zoned R4 and final plat approval has been given for
phase 1 (92 units). The applicants are aware that the City has made application
for federal funding for a land swap and purchase of some property and if that
happens they will come to the Commission for approval of buildings and parking.
Walkways will be constructed from the buildings to parking areas and detailed
construction drawings will be given to the staff in City Hall. Buildings will
be constructed as shown on the plan, and detailed drawings will be given to the
City before building permits are issued._ Additional access points to the loop
road, asked for by the Fire Chief, have been shown. They propose that the loop
road in this phase be the same asin phase 1 - 20' pavement with gravel base and
5' shoulders on both sides. There is room for a 6C' right of way in phase 1 and in
phase 2 also. It was mentioned that if the Commission wanted City street standards
in phase 2, it could also ask for them in phase 1. Mr. Page noted that the first
cluster of units was built in 1975 and is served by a private road. No requests
have been made to the City to change the status of that road. Phase 1 is 112
completed, Mr. Page said. The City :Manager has suggested public streets.
ir. Mona felt 20' streets were inadequate. Making the streets public was
discussed. The base necessary to widen the streets exists. The Commission did
not feel curbs were necessary, and a 24' pavement width was mentioned. There
is parking provided within the clusters and none will be on the streets.
6.
PLANNING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 13, 1979
Mr. Page said two sewer gaugings had been done and showed excess capacity
for sewage flow into the Laurel Hill and Andrews Avenue sewers. There is a
bottleneck on Imperial Avenue.
Mr. Page said public streets would be acceptable if the standards were
modified. Rights of way are shown to properties north and south of this project.
It was pointed out that if a section of the loop road were blocked, emergency
vehicles could not get all the way around the project.
All utilities are public.
The Commission would like to see 24' of pavement width and a 30' base for
the road in both phases.
Yir. Woolery moved to continue the public hearin., on the final plat application
of the Glenwood Corporation for phase 2 109 units of the Stonehedge development
until two weeks from tonight, November 27, at City Hall at 7:30 pm. Mr. Jacob seconded
the motion and all were in favor.
Continuation of site plan review of parking lot expansion for McDonald's at
1225 Williston Road
The applicants have requested a postponement of the hearing.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:45 pm.
Clerk
.t•
PROJECT NAME/FILE REF ENCE
;/&/7 9 i
1. LETTER OF NOTIF CATION
ADMINISTRATIVE CHECKLIST
Stonehed,
APPROVAL 'f4OTION OR FINDINGS & ORD
2. BONDING OR ESCROW AGREEMENTS
LANDSCAPING
SEWER
WATER
STORM DRAINAGE
ROADS
CURBS
SIDEWALKS
(NOTE ALL RELEASES OR AGREEMENT REVISIONS)
3. LIST APPROVALS GRANTED, WITH DATES, AND PERMITS GRANTED & SITE
INSPECTIONS COMPLETED, ETC.:
4. UTILITY EASEMENTS *, BILLS OF SALE
RECORDED
ACCEPTED
5. CERTIFICATE OF TITLE x
6. ROADWAYS
DEEDS FOR CITY STREETS ACCEPTED *
PRIVATE ROAD & WAIVER AGREEMENT x
- STAMPED , SIGNED, & FIL OR RECORDED
7. FINAL PLAT OR RECORD COPY
8. PEDESTRIAN EASEMENTS
ACCEPTED & RECORDED
FILED
9. MISCELLANEOUS AGREEMENTS
LAND FOR ROAD WIDENING
OFFER OF IRREVOCABLE DEDICATION
FUTURE ACCESS POINTS
SHARED ACCESS POINTS
OTHER
10. COPY OF SURVEY TO ASSESSOR (IF CHANGE IN PROPERTY LINES)
11. FEES - PAID/DATE
HEARING
BUILDING PERMIT
ENGINEERING INSP.
SEWER
9/0 9, av - a//6/77
RECREATION (RECORD CALCULATIONS AND DEPOSIT IN ACCOUNT)
12. IMPACT FOLLOW UP
i.e., "ON LINE" EVALUATION: SCHOOL KIDS CAR COUNTS
�h' ��✓ J l ^ �7L UM7 f*' tlYl
�J�,�i✓Y
J � �� �� Ulf � /:�� ✓ � �/� 4 J ly �� � `i �� _
�r
12
f-16 1tpn-, --- -
s u
ait
-/-�- • -
/-1 v � �, jaw �,� [/J��
eai
C
A-VI
1
if%�''✓�-/.y:�2�-(.�?,G�i �� �i!'iP /�� Y „�/�' — , tj/j" 1'�;e?l.�dr'r � l '�`�"
Abuttors - Phase I
Norman Campbell
1411 Spear Street
t,,allace Blancharc
275 College Street
Burlington
Paul Mellish
�1421 Spear Street
Peter Lawlor
1431 Spear Street
Martin Koplewitz
1435 Spear St.
(Regional Planning)
fog 3/��/yam
&KRNBois
inc.
ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
ME210
TO: South Burlington Planning Commission
FROM: Stephen Page, DuBois & King
RE: Individual Cluster Plans - Stonehedge
DATE: 136vember 9, 1979
159 Pearl Street
Essex Junction, Vermont 05452
(802) 879-6567
Future building permit requests will be accompanied by detailed site
plans of each cluster, drawn at a scale of 20-30' to the inch. If there
are substantive changes between the building, parking, or road layout as
approved by the Commission on the 60 scale plan, the developer will submit
an application to the Commission for a revised final plat. Otherwise,
building permits will be issued only upon a determination by the City
Zoning Administrator or Planner that the layout is in substantial conformance
with the previously approved final plat. 'these plans are exemplified by the
"as -built" drawings which have already been submitted on a cluster by cluster
basis for Phase I. The information to be shown includes the following:
- finished building grades
- parking lot drainage
- existing and proposed contours at 1' intervals
- plan views of water & sewer services .and meters
- underground utilities (phone, cable 'IV, gas, electric)
- walkways
- sewer & road profiles
- cluster boundary markers, bearings and distances
Randolph. Vermont Fs -ex Junction, Vermont Concord. New Hampshire
PUBLIC HEARING
SOUTH BURL INGTON PLANNING C014MI S S ION
The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public
hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 1175
Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, November 13 ,
197_2. at 7:30 p.m., to consider the following:
#1. Final application of Wallace & Margaret Blanchard to subdivide a one (1)
acre lot into two lots (.6 acre and .4 acre) located at 62 East Terrace. The
proposed subdivision is bounded by properties -of Daniel George, George Deforge
and the Quarry Hill Tennis Club.
#2. Final plat application of L.T.H. Associates to construct a 17 unit apartment
complex on a 2.5 acre parcel directly southeast of 200 Kennedy Drive. The proposed
subdivision is bounded by Kennedy Drive on the northwest, and on the east and south
by lands of Forest Park Realty Corporation.
#3. Final plat application of the Glenwood Corporation for subdivision approval of
Phase I1 of the Stonehedge development; Phase 11 consists of 109 condominium units,
and is bounded on the west by lands of the City of South Burlington, on the north
by Phase I, on the east by lands of Campbell,Blanchard, Mellish, Lawlor an
Koplewitz and on the south by lands of Nowland.
Copies of the applications are available
for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall.
Sidney B. Poger
Chairman
South Burlington
Planning Commission
October 27, 1979
M E M O R A N D U M
To: Stonehedge File
From: SSP
Re: Informational requirements for Stonehedge Phase II final plat
Date: 9/18/79
I met with Mervin Brown, owner, and Lance Llewellyn engineer, this
afternoon to discuss information requirements for the final plat for phase
2 of Stonehedge.
I told them that the following information would suffice for the purpose of
the final plat: plan view of loop road (with spot elevations) public sewer
(with invert elevations) and water mains storm drainage and cluster layout, all
at a scale of 50-100'; it was also understood that larger scale (20'-30' per
inch) "as -built" drawings would be submitted on a cluster by cluster basis;
further review by the Commission would be required if there were substantive
changes in building or road layout from the approved final plat to the large scale
working drawing stage.
Additional information may be required during the course of the final plat
public hearing, including a review of the issue of design standards and owner-
ship for the loop road.
cc: Merve Brown, Lance Llewellyn, Dick Ward, WJS
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: Stephen Page, Planner
Re: Next Meeting's Agenda Items
Date: May 4, 1979
#2 Meadowood South
I have conferred with Dick Spokes on the access question;
he has recommended clearing this up at the outset, and that the
Commission not proceed towards a preliminary approval conditioned
on the resolution of the road situation. I would add that the
sewer and water lines to be extended to the new project, presently
lie within the private street rights of way at Meadowood at Spear;
consequently,they too are a part of the street issue.
The other items left open for discussion at the last meeting
were: drainage (see comments from City Engineer), pedestrian trail
location (apparently no meeting has taken place yet), and parkland
dedication or rquivalent fee - the site obligation works out to
about 2/3 of an acre (equivalent fee would be about $900). My
recommendation is to acquire the land in this situation. I will be
consulting with Bruce O'Neil on this prior to the meeting. In summary,
I strongly urge you to resolve the street and utility situation uP
front; I reiterate my very firm recommendation that public streets
and utilities be required for this proposal - to do otherwise invites
continued disputes with this and other developers, as well as home-
owners, over utility extensions, school bussing, road maintainence,
and other municipal services.
#3 The Partners Subdivision
A site inspection will be held 4:00 P.M. Monday, May 7, at the
rear of the Grand Union building. A response from the School Board,
on access across their property, is still pending. As far as traffic
is concerned, Bruce Houghton has indicated he would prefer to present
"N T` his reliminar findin s to the Commission and et their input be-
�._.mcc� ---- —�' -- - 9� g P
fore making comments on this specific proposal. Bill Szymanski's
d comments on drainage are attached.
#4 Revised Preliminary Plat, Phase II of Stonehe!ge
The phase II plan you last saw showed 109 multifamily units in
seven clusters; this has been revised by dropping the number of units
to 94, situated in six multifamily clusters and one cluster of 10
single family lots.
The utilities and roadway serving the single family cluster
should be built to City standards, and owned and maintained by the
City.
M E M O R A N D U M
To: South Burlington Planning Commission
From: William Szymanski, City Manager
Re: Next Meeting's Agenda Items
Date: May 4, 1979
Stonehe
1. Streets should be public, 30' width, curbs, etc.
2. Is a house planned for lot #10?
3. Water Department must review water main layout.
O'Brien Property, Hinesburg Road
1. The road connecting Twin Oaks, Timber Lane and Castlerock
should extend to connect Hinesburg Road and become a public street.
2. The most westerly cluster is on land that is very poorly
drained.
Oakbrook Pine's
1. Cul-de-sacs shall be City standard with pavement width
sufficient for parking.
2. Drainage ditch from Sherry Road to Rand property should be
dredged and cleaned.
3. Additional drainage catch basins will be required.
4. Water Department to review water main layout.
5. Manhole inverts on sanitary sewer in Oakwood Drive may have
to be repaired before additional sewage flow is added to the system.
6. Transition in street width as shown on Brookwood Drive
should be on right side of the street.
Meadowood South
1. Additional storm water catch basins should be added especially
near lots 36, 14, 30, 21. Maximum street drainage per catch basin
should be 300 feet.
2. Water Department to review water main layout.
3. Streets should be City owned and maintained.
�t emote, u.a4-
pi�c�u.e�w-e�Tit� �C uPcu
March 16, 1979
Mr. lervin Drown
Glenwood Corporation
Stonehedge Drive
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Preliminary Plat, Stonehedge Phase II
Dear Merv:
This is to formally confirm the action of the South Burlington
Planning Commission, at its meeting of 3/13/79, in approving your
preliminary plat for "hale II of Stonehedge. The minutes of the
meeting are encloses?, which specify the conditions of the approval.
'lease note that your preliminary plat must be recordee within 90
days. This approval is valid for 3 yogrs from the dated of the
hearing. Don't hesitate to call if you have any questions.
Yours truly,
Stephen Page,
Planner
1 Encl
cc: Terry Boyle
i
PLANNING COY24ISSION
2.
].ARCH 13, 1979
shall not be contiguous with the proposed drainage easement (verify this
with the City Engineer), and shall be via a_- permanent easement.
5. Survey data and drafts of legal documents shall accompany the final_
plat application.
6. At least 1 additional fire hydrant shall be added in accord with
the Fire Chief's recommendations.
rrT .Jacob seconded the motion
Mr. Ewing did not like the idea of a lot with no frontage but it was
pointed out that the lots were laid out like that because the Commission had
requested it and it was also noted that the shared access would reduce the
number of curb cuts on the road, particularly around the bend.
Kr. Page showed the Commission a draft of the letter to the Highway
Department regarding the subdivision. The Commission felt the following
should be added to the letter, " The Commission feels the road would be
better served and the possibility of accidents would be reduced if a left
turn stacking lane and a through lane were shown on Shelburne Road with a
striped line."
The motion passed unanimously.
Continue public hearing on preliminary plat fof Stonehedee.►ahase 2
Mr. Page said there was sewer capacity for the project and that phase
2 had been submitted to the School Board. There are also questions about
site layout. There will be 109 3-bedroom condominiums in 7 clusters in
phase 2. The additional hydrants requested by the Fire Chief have been
shown and additional access points between the loop road and parking lots
for fire trucks have been also. Access to the sewer will be via a paved
way over which trucks can travel to get to the manhole. This is a walkway
in addition to providing access for utility maintenance equipment. On the
final plat the loop road will not be shown going through a stand of trees.
An area of about 100' x 60' has been shown for parking boats, campers, etc.
A 60' right of way has been shown throughout the project's loop road and
22' pavement width has been proposed. Xr. Woolery wondered if the Commission
should suggest that the original part of the loop road be upgraded to
22-24' of pavement and Mr. Poger said the Commission would like to retain
the option that if at any time there was an unsafe condition in the development
because of road width, they could require the road to be widened.
;fir. lioolery wanted it made clear in,the final motion that there would be
no city services provided on the roads and that they would have to be up
to city standards before the city would accept them.
Mr. Boyle anticipated a 3-5 year build -out period for phase 2, and said
that the excess runoff which would be created by paving much of the land in
the area would follow the existing drainage pattern. He said the developers
would do everything possible to minimize the impact of that excess water.
yr. 'eoolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve
the preliminary plat application of the Glenwood Corporation, for phaseIT—
of Stonehedge, consisting of 109 3-bedroom condominiums as de icted on a
,Elan entitled, "-reliminary plat. ._Stonehedt.e", dated 3 12 79 drawn t
office of Terrance Boyle, subject to the ^following stipulations:
1. "Typical"cluster landscapirg_and parking dimensions shall be as
previously subritted and aY;roved for Phase I.
N
3•
PLANNING COS ISSION MARCH 13, 1979
2. Building seFarations shall be as approved by the Fire Chief.
3. The layout of the sewer line, loop road, and Cluster "M" shall be
revised so as to minimize damage to existing vegetation on this site and.
rkland
4. The Commission reserves the right to male a final determination -on
roadway ownership a_nd construction specifications for the looproad at the
final plat hearing.
5. Specifications for the internal path systems shall be submitted at
final plat.
6. Phasing schedule is as- follows: 1980-50 units. 1981 - 34 un ts-.-
1982 - 25 units, unless otherwise approved at final plat. If the project is
rd completed prior to 1985, resubmission shall be required. _
7. Sewer and water mains will be municipally owned and maintained.
S. This plan shall be recorded within 90 ems.
Mr. Jacob seconded the motion. -
It was noted that the phasing schedule imposed by the Commission was to
force the -developer to build out gradually, thereby not putting a large drain
on city services suddenly.
The motion passed unanimously.
Site plan review, office building at northwest corner of Dorset Street and
Kennedy Drive
:fir. Hurley said the plan showed a loop for in and out traffic and that
35 parking spaces were shown. All the things required before, when the
apFlication was for residential units have been shown again, such as the
possible on ramp for the Interstate and land for Dorset Street widening.
This building is smaller than the last one. There will be 7 medical and
dental offices of 1,000 sq. ft. each, and the building will be 1 112 stories
tall. It meets all the setback requirements. Each office will have two
entrances - one in front and one in back.
Mr. Page said that if the city land next to this were developed, if the
city wanted to, and at its expense, access to this property could be provided
and the two could share a curb cut.
Y.r. Woolery moved that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve
the site plan proposal of Gordon Hurley for a 7 unit dental medical complex
0 7,000 sq. ft., as depicted on a plan entitled "The Willows", subject to
the followin-- stipulations:
1. A strip of land, 12' in width, for widening of Dorset Street shall
be secured by an offer of irrevocahie��c3i�ation
2. The approval of this plan supercedes the previous a_prroval and
associated stiaulations for a residential -roject.
3. Access to the project from Dorset Street may be relocated, at the
C_ity's expense, to a point north of, but within 100of this pro,:ertyt_w:.en_
and if the abutting municipal property is developed.
1
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
Subdivision Application - FINAL PLAT
I Name of Applicant / $±ZOW"
I
II Name of Subdivision y4loci T'0'
� 5
III Indicate any changes,to name, address, or phone number of
owner of record, applicant, contact person, engineer, sur-
veyor, attorney or plat designer since preliminary plat
application: rpig ' - -
WW lez,40A 46n
IV Indicate any changes to the subdivision, such as number of lots
or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the
property, developmental timetable, since preliminary plat
application
V Attach a final plat drawing (originals not needed) showing the
following information:
(1) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title, the name
and address of the record owner and subdivider, the name,
license number and seal of the licensed land surveyor, the
boundaries of the subdivision and its general location in
relation to existing streets or other land marks, scale
(numerical and graphic), date and true north arrow.
(2) Street names and lines, pedestrial ways, lots, reservations,
easements, and areas to be dedicated to public use.
(3) Sufficient data acceptable to the City Engineer to determine
readily the location, bearing and length of every street line,
lot line, boudary line and to reproduce such lines upon the
ground. Where applicable these should be tied to reference
points previously established by the city.
-2-
(4) The length of all straight lines, the deflection angles,
radii, length of curves and central angles of all curves,
tangent distances and tangent bearings for each street.
(5) By property designation on such Plat, all public space
for which, offers of cession are made by the subdivider
and those spaces title to :which is reserved by him.
(6) Lots within the subdivision numbered in numerical order
within blocks, and bloc?-s lettered in alphabetical order.
(7) The location of all of the re-ferred to in
Section 301.1tand in addition thereto the location of
all utility poles, -se:.,-age disposal systemns, %:,-ater supply
systems and rough grading and other devices and methods
of draining the area affecting the subdivision.- soak
(8) Permanent reference :nonu�ents sho:•r-n thus: and lot
corner :aarhers shoran thus: "O".
(9) Construction drawings of all :.-eouired improvements.
VI -nciose supporting 6ocuments listed below or request that they
be required as a condition of final plat approval:
(1) Copies of proposed seeds, agreements or other docuusants
showing the manner in which open space, including park
and recreational areas and school site areas, are to br
dedicated, reserved and maintained and a certificate of
the City Attorney that these dociLments are satisfactory.
(2) A certificate of the City :Ingineer as to the satisfactory
completion o= all inprovemients required try the Co:n-nis sion,
or, in lieu of any required L-nprovements not so completed,
a performance bond to secure completion of such improvements
and their-l:aaintenance for a period of two years, and
written evidence that the Citv Council is satisfied
either with the bonging or surety company or with security
furnished by the subdivider.
(3) A copy of such covenants or dead restrictions as are in-
tended to cover all or part of the tract.
(4) A prospectus describing the management organization if one
is required.
(5) In the case of a subdivision or development served by a
privately owned and/or maintained street:.
(a) a copy of all proposed deeds, agreements, or other
docu.-nents which convey or relate to the use of a
privately owned street or right-of-way, and a certi-
fic-te of the City Attorney that these doctLments are
satisfactory.
(sicrature
-3-
(b) a completed contract between the lando;aner and the
city regarding the number of lots or dwelling units
to be served by the proposed right-of-way or private
.street and the responsibility for the roadway naint-
enance, along with a certificate of the Ci°:..,r Attorney
that the contract is satisfactory.
zppli-*nt' ctr contact person
No Text
i 3/ 9 iL>
SSP
SUGGESTED MOTION OF APPROVAL -
Stonehedge
I move that the South Burlington Planning Commission approve
the preliminary plat application of the Glenwood Corporation, for
phase II of Stonehedge, consisting of 109 3 bedroom condominiums,
as de icted on a plan entitled, "Preliminary plat...Stonehecge// dated
3/12779, drain by office of Terrance Boyle, subject to the following
stipulations:
\\ //
1. typical cluster lane sc.yAng a :d dimensions shall be
as previously submitted and approved for Phase I.
2. building separations shall be as approved by the Fire Chief.
3. the layout of the sewer line, loop road, and cluster "M"
shall be revised so as to minimize damage to existing vegetation on
this site and the City parkland.
4. the Commission reserves the right to make a final determination
on roadway ownership and construction specifications for the loop road
at the final plat hearing.
5. Specifications for the internal path systems shall be sub-
mitted at final plat.
6. Phasing schedule is as follows: clusters H, I, J, : 1980
(50 units), K, L: 1981 (34 units), M, N: 1982 (25 units), unless
otherwise approved at final plat.
7. sewer and water mains will be municipally owned & maintained.
8. this plan shall be recorded within 90 days.
r
i
I
�
PUBLIC HEARING
SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COMMISSION
The South Burlington Planning Commission will hold a public
hearing at the South Burlington City Hall, Conference Room, 1175
Williston Road, South Burlington, Vermont on Tuesday, February 27,
197 9, at 7:30 p.m., to consider the following:
Preliminary plat application of the Glenwood Corporation for
subdivision approval of Phase II of the Stonehedge aevelopmeht;
Phase II consists of 109 condominium units, and is bounded on the
west by lands of the City of South Burlington, on the north by
Phase I, on the east by lands of Campbell, Blanchard, Mellish,
Lawlor and Koulewitz, and on the south by lands of Nowland.
Copies of the application are available
for public inspection at the South Burlington City Hall.
Sidney B. Poger,
Chairman
South Burlington
Planning Commission
February 10, 1979
FEB 1 1979
M E M O R A N D U M
To: Terry Boyle, Mery Brown
From: Steve Page
Re: Stonehedge Preliminary Plat, Phase II
Date: 2/12/79
The following should be submitted, in order to complete
the application:
1) completed application form (enclosed)
2) hearing fee - $109.00
3) review overall layout plan with Fire Chief
4) review water plan with Ed Blake, Champlain Water Zi-t7rr44.rr
5) review sewers Awith Bill Szymanski - flow test results
needed. 4,T iA, 0(_>4q+-(,,A.;,
6) maintain 60' ROW throughout for loop road
7) construction timing for phase II
8) bedroom distribution in Phase II units as presented to
South Burlington School Board.
pu'r
1
CITY OF SOUTH BURLINGTON
Subdivision Application - PRELIMINARY PLAT
1) Name '.of Applicant
2) Name of Subdivision
Glenwood Corporation
µStonehedge
3) Describe Subdivision (i.e. total acreage, number of lots or
units, type of land use, include gross floor area if comm-
ercial.) Condominium Phase II 109 units
4) Indicate any changes to name, address, or phone number of
owner of record,applicant, or contact person since sketch
plan application: Mervin Brown phone 863-1389
,Glenwood Corp:___,-
_ Stonehedge Drive
_ So. Burlington, Vermont 05401
5. Name, address, and phone number of:
a. Engineer ---------Webster Martin Inc. phone 864-0223
1025 Airport RoadSo_ Burlington, Vermont_
b. Surveyor Engineers Inc. of Vermont phone 863-6389
P.O. Box 2187 Williston Road So. Burlington, Vermont
C. Attorney _ ____Carl Lisman phone 864-5756
191 College St. Burlington, Vermont
�. Pl1t Desi^.ner
The Office of
Terrence J. Boyle phone 658-3555
301 College
St.
Burlington,
Vermont
-z-
6) Indicate any changes to the subdivision such as number of lots
or units, property lines, applicant's legal interest in the
property, etc., since this proposal was last before the
Commission: N.A.
7) List names and mailing addresses of owners of record of all cont-
igous properties:
N.A.
8) State title, drawing number, date of original plus any revisions,
and designers) of ;the preliminary map(s) accompanying this appli-
cation: Preliminary Plat dated 2116/79
The Office of Terrence J. Boyle
9) Attach a preliminary map showing the following information:
1) Proposed subdivision name or identifying title and the name
of the city.
2) Name and address of owner of record, subdivider and designer
of Preliminary Plat.
3) Number of acres within the proposed subdivision, location
of property lines, structures, watercourses, wooded areas,
and other essential existing physical features.
4) The names of all subdivisions immediately adjacent and the
names of owners of record of adjacent acreage.
5) The location and size of any existing sewers and water
mains, culverts and reins on the property or serving the
property to be subdivided.
6) Location, names and widths of existing, and proposed streets,
private ways, sidewalks, curb cuts, paths, easements, parks
-3-
and other public or privately maintained open spaces as
well as similar facts regarding adjacent property.
7) Contour lines at intervals of five feet, based on United
States Geological Survey datum of existing grades and also
of proposed finished grades where change of existing ground
elevation will be five feet or more.
8) Complete survey of subdivision tract by a licensed land
surveyor.
9) Numerical and graphic scale, Cate and true north arrow.
10) Details of proposed connection wits existing water supply
or alternative mans of providing water supply to the
proposed subdivision.
11) Details of proposed connection with the existing sanitary
sewage disposal system or adequate provision for on -site
disposal of septic wastes.
12) If on -site sewage disposal system is proposed .� location
and results of tests to ascertain subsurface toil, rock
and ground water conditions, depth to around water unless
pits are dry at depth of five feet; location and results
of percolation tests.
13) Provisions for collecting and discharging storm drainage
in the form of drainage plan.
14) Preliminary designs of any bridges or culverts which may
be required.
15) The location of temporary markers adequate to enable the
Commission to locate readily and appraise the basic lay-
out in the field. Unless an existing street intersection
is shown, the distance along a street from one corner of
the property to the nearest existing street intersection
shall be shown.
15) All parcels of land proposed to be dedicated or reserved
for public use and the conditions of such dedication or
reservation.
10) Developmental timetable (including number of phases, and start
and completion dates)
i98o - 83
11) List the waivers applicant desires from the requirements
of these regulations: none _ —
-4-
12) Attach a vicinity map showing the following:
1) All existing subdivisions, approximate tract lines and
acreage of adjacent parcels, together with the names of
the record oz•mers of all adjacent parcels of land, namely,
those directly abutting or directly across any street ad-
joining the proposed subdivision.
2) Locations, widths and names of existing1filed or proposed
streets, curb cuts, easements, building lines and alleys
pertaining to the proposed subdivision and to the adjacent
properties as designated in paragraph 1 above.
3) An outline of the platted area together with its street
system and an in6ication of the -future probable street
system of the remaining portion of the tract, if the
Preliminary Plat suaiitted covers only part of the sub -
divider's entire holding.
(signatAre) applican
r contact person
ea te
*
/
-'
'~^.^^-^
``.-^----..~~
./
,.,--~^/
..................
`
............ . ......
..................
l �
No Text
1 fy_ t , •l' K ', Y
MEMORANDUM
To: South Burlington 41anning Commission
From: Stephen Page, Planner
Re:- -Next Meeting's Agenda Items
Date: 3/9/79
#2 Lozon
A suggested motion of approval and draft of letter to the
Highway Department will be available at the meeting.
#3 Stonehedge
The layout revisions discussed last time are being made and
should be finallized in an acceptable form prior to the meeting.
#4 Hurley Site Plan
The previously approved 7 unit condominium plan for this site
has been ahelvedf the new plan is for seven 1,000 square foot office
units within a single building. With some minor modifications, the one
way circulation pattern around the building, with diagonal parking, is
adequate. A waiver of 2 spaces from the required 35 will be necessary.
With these exceptions, the site plan is -acceptable in-�all respects
(Fire Chiefs comments forthcoming). The previous stipulations
concerning land reservation for the proposed northbound on -ramp to
the Interstate, .land for widening of Dorset Street, and relocation of
the access.point furtber from the intersection will still apply.
,t -
;�-1g'I
� -(kt� ti
�G Nvrlt . * qq
P� � Wew-=-
,:-r
-P-A V m W.14 4E � -- P. G. 4 �3L c' l-I � oc�-- co�=
L,� (Z��IVP-i-
`Fv--6-c- Fes.
r� cr-i-lcu -
Q//��yio
CD�pt��fp�-Nub�tp�-1 �nFt� ttC,tt�(�
- U�•�1-LX-- ���o�{ -�t,P b- � � �� �� � fir}-izt{
vzw� Cq o�{
l�
N4
N4,10CAL -1
-- Pc- Pa -� -T' UK ACC��
�� -.,fir �:� � •��. ..i►�� :� �-
t�l Urw 6Z c
zo �.,,_,.a weed. M F�
cc, dab
�U
a v. Q�
Stonehedge - Phase II
The basic concept of a perimeter loop road linking
clusters of 10 to 20 units as in Phase I, has been continued
for the 109 (all 3 bedr0
0
m3 units of Phase II. All applicable
conditions of the previous approval have been complied with.
Site layout considerations include building separations
and cluster drive dimensions, maintaining a 601 right-of-way
at least alon the east segment of the loop road, rerouting
the loop road to avoid the only 2 significant stands of
trees on site, loop road pavement width, water system review
by Champlain Water District and Fire Chief, details on path
system, supplementary parking for trailers, and on site
recreation amenities. Impacts on major community services
have been assessed for schools and sewage treatment plant
capacity (both adequate). Traffic can be estimated but
there are no areas nearby where unreasonable congestion could
be attributed to this particular project.
ME MORA NDU14
TO: SOUTH BURLINGTON PLANNING COi14ISSION
FROIZ: WILLIA14 J. SZY14ANSKI
DATE: FEBRUARY 23, 1979
RE: STONEHEDGE
1. Street right-of-way should be 60 feet in width.
2. Sewer manholes must be placed where they are accessible
to truck mounted cleaning equipment such as in roads and
parking areas.
3. Drainage from clusters west of drainageway must be so
designed that storm runoff is toward drainageway.
4. City Water Dept. to review water main layout.
/-; �, c", - 5 1 -Z -s- �
VA-
IFreAK-
ld-ts
SOUTH BURLINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401
FREDERICK H. TUTTLE
Superintendent
LAWRENCE E. LECOURS
Assistant Superintendent
Mr. Carl H. Lisman
Lisman $ Lisman
Attorneys at Law
191 College Street
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Dear Carl,
OFFICE: SOUTH BURLINGTON HIGH SCHOOL
550 Dorset Street
January 25, 1979
At their regular meeting, on .January 24, 1979 the South Burlington School
Directors voted that the STONEHEDGE Development (Phase II) as outlined in Mr.
Brown's letter dated November 1, 1978 and your letter of November 29, 1978
would not place an unreasonable burden on this municipality to provide edu-
cational services.
Because of the concern for the safety of our students, it is requested
that sidewalks be provided in conjunction with the roads to be constructed.
This will allow students to walk safely to and from bus stops. I am enclosing
a copy of our transportation policy for your information. Please note item #4
under the administrative guidelines -"Buses will not be routed over private
roads".
The following school information may he of assistance in meeting with
prospective clients:
Grades K-S Orchard School
Shelburne Road
South Burlington
Grades 9-12 high School
550 Dorset Street
South Burlington
Grades 6-8 Middle School
500 Dorset Street
South Burlington
If you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely yours,
Frederick If. Tuttle
Superintendent of Schools
rHT:cl
enc.
Vcc: Mr. Stephen Pag,e
Mr. John Lucas
Mr. Donald Lockhart
/1A
V
CONSULTING A ENGINEERS
PAULSEN ASSOCIATES
INCORPORATED
RECEIVED
Nov 1 iJJ J
MANAGER'S OFFICE
CITY SO. BURLINGTON
40 FARRELL STREET • • SOUTH BURLINGTON, VERMONT 05401 • TEL. (802) 864-0126
October 26, 1972
City of South Burlington
1181 Williston Road
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Attention: Mr. William G. Szymanski, City Manager
Re: P. A. Job No. 7223
Gentlemen:
Further to our recent report on the sewers in Imperial Drive
and Laurel Drive, we now submit further information on the
elevation of the Imperial Drive sewer relative to the existing
12" sewer in Shelburne Road. The information was compiled from
actual invert elevations where manhole covers could be removed.
The invert of the Shelburne Road sewer opposite Imperial Drive
was calculated using a gradient of 2.533% from the lower manhole.
The upstream invert could not be obtained because the cover has
recently been paved over. ,
M.H
w
>
�
o
I
U
W
a
U,
NI
E
Wto
a
_
M
M H . wv 137. 60
I
621 S'ISEWS
M. H.
GR.,DE 0.27
U
u,
'
'7
N
IO
d
I
62, t
_
338 't
COVER PAVE-p I 1'2SEWER Gv-i+oE 2.5337
OVER
CALCULATED INV. 12" M. H NEAR M• NOSH MOTOeS'
SEWER 135.42 INv 12G.96
October 26, 1972
City of South Burlington
Page 2
A sewer laid from Manhole 2 in Imperial Drive at a gradient
of 1 in 105 (0.95%) will reach the Shelburne Road sewer with an
invert elevation of 135.73. The relative capacities of new 8
inch and 10 inch sewers laid at this gradient are as follows:
8" dia. pipe radient
1/105 �0.95%)
10" dia. pipe tradient
1/105 0.95%)
FLOWING FULL
575 GPM
1043 GPM
68% OF PIPE
DEPTH
460 GPM
835 GPM
We trust this is the additional information you require.
Very truly yours,
PAULSEN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Arthur W. Parkes
AWP/meo
P.S. We estimate the 8 inch sewer located in front of the John
Hancock office to have the following capacity when calculated
using the same criteria as was used in the previous report.
FLOWING FULL 68% OF PIPE
8" diasewer with grade of DEPTH
0.274% 247 GPM
198 GPM
1 t r
IF
I
C O N S U I. T I N G F N G I N F F R S
wt-t l:ti^1-t-1 Z MAI=�T1 N
I N C O R P O R A T E D
1025 AIRPORT PRIVF • P.O. BOX ??SIG • SOIITII IIIIRIINf1ON, WRMONT 05401 • ARFA CODF 802-964 0721
January 1 I , l')71)
Glenwood Corporation
198 College Street
Burlington, Vermont 05401
Mr. M. Brown
�ii1(�T IN, t,l I Ir1W 1"t'I �iI iv-, I,1 And-it'w:l 11'o,ltl
Gentlemen:
We have carried out: sewer gaging operations, as requested, to
determine the present maximum flow for the sewer length shown on
the attached plan. After some study of the existing system, we
decided to measure iiir` flaw in tho manliole at flit' -junct.inn of
ScuLl_:3tl.ilt! 11 uo,I l ,Ilrtl t'.I1•t'n DOIPIIiI1 lar iv". 'I'11ia l�,t ,a1_icun .,I It,w:r
all of the flow from Andrews Road 10 be measurod but also irlc•luc o-,1
Ills? I ltlw ,litre h.lttlilltl 1 11,111 :4,ot I;ItI.►It I;t�,ltl.
Our first choice to measure this flow was at the manhole at the
junction of Andrews Roatl and Croon ho11i11 i n •1)1-i vt- Not tali 1-,voved
to be unsuitable for installation of the equipment. Tho limited
number of manholes in ,Andrews Road also precluded gaging further
upstream because much of Lhe flow would have u-(►Lered the sewcir
downstream of the weir and would, therefore, be unrecorded.
The gagings were made by installing a small rectangular weir in
tlae manllolt- An thal all of 1110 flnw had to nv(-r t 11t' wt`i r
llll,l<`r'tI1IIII II.ow11:;1 II'ooll• 'I'ht' \J�`11 ill t_'t111,llllt'I Il)il 1JII II :1
Leopold and Stevens Instrument, recorded the flows on a chart,
a copy of which we have attached hereto.
'1'Ilti 1 itIa1'. 1 ttt't 11 t ltlt 1 1 1 t 1W t 11 •4411 1 9'1 I itI if1111) t 1%( I III,1I t' 1 y I1 :1 . 111. 1111 I Ito
morning of December 26, 1976. One oLher sligliLly higher beak
occurred at about R p.m. on the same day. We have disregarded
1.11in lit,catull, it- W:I:I 1111111/•dl,ll r•ly (,rt t'r'r•rlt d by a 1r,4/ .,fill wr'
feel it was probably caused by a partial blockage in the sewer
which suddenly released causing a surge in the flow.
,
A WIIOIIY OWN[D SUBSIDIARY Of 11IIIRFSNI-111NRY INGINIIRING CORP.. NORIII SPRINGIIIIO. VIRMON(
rl rnwond Corporation -2-
January 11-, 1979
Flow readings were taA,n over two soparato periods. The first
.qI. art i net OII 111e moo 11 i 11(1 (A' I)o �(,( mb,,i I')' , lo)78 111(1 cojil_ i nu i tig I O
December 18, 1978. The second period started on the morning of
December 22, 1978 and continued until the morning of December
27, 1978. The second period of readings taken over the Holiday
period were markedly higher than those of the first period. We
are of the opinion that the results obtained are representative
of the peak sewage flows which might be expected in such an
area. The tabulation following shows the high and low flows which
occurred duri nd the :;cannel r)ori od of rec-ordi nd from Docemhor ?.? to
December 27, 1978.
Night
Minimum
Peak Flow Rate Flow Rate
Day Date GPD GPD
Saturday
12/23/78
76,210
2,793
Sunday
12/24/78
58,070
5,948
Monday
I /7'11/ 8
7 1 , I')()
•1 , ;'78
Tuesday
1 ; /26/7ti
88, 07';
, 703
These flow rai.os arc, c-alc-ulat(-d frOm t-Iw Franc -i:: Porrmlla for
sharp crouit-od recl_'-an(t(a 1.11 weit:3 wi Lll (�Ild CU111_r,1c t i(.1110. 'Vh$--
formula is as follows:
Flow in Cubic Feet Per Second. Q = 3.33 H3/2. (L-0.2H)
"II" Represents the flow over the weir in feet
"L" Represents t:he loiadlli of Ili,, weir in foot
The above tabulated flows represeiiL tl►c flows t>.om Andrews Road
and Scottsdale Road. Since each road has approximately the same
number of houses contributing flow, we have used half of the
peak rate (44,038 gpd) as being representative of the flow in
Andrews Road.
The flatest nownr nradi rent in Ar►drows Road i s t 1io-iort-ic�n
I U1111111(1 U1111-1 1.1 1 1 #_)111 1 11" i III ,I :1(`�'t_ itm ,I A11, 11 lit ta4l all#t (;1 —,11
Dolphin Drive which has a slope of 0.60%. The full pipe capacity
of this sewer will provide for a flow of approximately 72 cubic feet
per minute. Thi t3 ogiial s 538 nal 1 on:r per mi n►it o or 774,720 cyal l ons
put (..lay. T" 1JC Val_ i V" MINI 110 i 11IJ c'1 tl(_"Ji 1-ahl (, 1 low d("I+l 11 of
only 68% of the pipe, the capacity of the flatest length of sewer
in Andrews Road represents a flow of. about 581,040 �3all-ons per day.
Glenwood Corporation -3- January 11, 1979
Deducting the peak Acorded flow of 44,03B gpd leaves a surplus
capacity as follows:
581,040
44,038
537 002 SAY 537,000 gpd spare capacity
Our estimate of flow from the additional log units to be con-
structed at Glenwood is as follows:
1 OC) uni 1.9 C,) 4 por;►enn pol- nn i I 116 11orsen:
At 100 gpd per Person Average Daily Flow = 43,600 gpd
Using a Peak Hourly Rate of 6 Times Average=261,600 gpd
Thmrefore, it is anticipated the existing 8 inch transite sewer
in Andrews Road which at its flatest gradient and flowing at
68% of full depth has a spare capacity of 537,000 gallons per
day, can easily accept this additional estimated peak flow of
261,600 gpd from the proposed 109 additional condominium units.
Tfio above c,-►] cuati ens aro h,1:u,c3 on r(_ccir-d i mis t ,ikoti ciur i no a
period wilen inf i 1 Lr.11 ion of (]roundw.►Lor would bi, 1.t o bo
quite low. llur. i r►cl I.11o 11c1 t_li.►w wlloll (11-01,111d it 01 (A (w-it
increase grater flow rates may occur in the Andrews Road Sewer.
Very Ll my y(-)i►i :j,
WEBSTER-MARTIN, INC.
L C? ---
Art ur W. Parkes f
Project Rndinoor
AWP:app
3
4.00 INCH
I
22 Dec 78
23
18
24 D
tc 79
25 c 78
26
18
LOD INcH—
r.--
N,
TPI
-
—
DATUM .
--• --
-
--
_
2.00I l,,c *i
15,DE 19 16 DE 7 8 I� DE 'l8 16 bu c -1
Z
8:
Z
c
i
z
8
T
D
O
_
1. 00 ,NCI4
f
-
DATUM•
}�
— — — ____
-. 'G LEN WOOD CORPORA.T t ON
SEWEP- GAUGING _
RELATIVE to FLows ON A.wt)2rNs gyp.
-
AN DFZE WS ROAD
FLOW D I2t'_Cjj cN
I
j 0 W Di e ecTfc10
GAVGlNC7 n
C� MANHOLt;
v � L
r rn
Z �
O
D
c�
iJ SA N( I)LEW OD IDLLIVe d
E c Lo
m
SEI'✓t'1 ��C ('.oac�
GLEKwooD Cow.PoRAR(pNi
cJ�WC2 .C�AUC� l i�(C-�
FZc L,P,Tt vc To FLOWS 01,t
GOUTH E3U 2LlN1GTON.
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Engineering and Planning Services
The Kiln • 15 Brickyard Road • Essex Junction • Vermont • 05452 • (802) 878-3000
1 July 1985
Ms. Jane Bechtel
City Planner
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
RE: Stonehedge - Clusters M & N
FILE: 8143
Dear Ms. Bechtel:
Following our meeting with Chief James Goddette, we have revised the
site plan drawings for Stonehedge Clusters M & N, to bring all building
ridge lines to a distance no greater that 70' from the roadway centerlines.
The following changes occurred:
1. Cluster N - Sheet D-1274 - Units 9-12 and 13-16 were
moved westerly.
2. Cluster M - Sheet D-1270 - Units 5-8 were rotated to
front the access road while Units 1-4 remained as
before.
3. Utilities and driveways for the above changes (1 & 2) were
modified as required.
The changes are as shown (in sketch form) to Chief Goddette and met with his
approval. Should you require additional information or copies, please call.
Sincerely,
FITZPATRICK-LLEW�EELLLLYYN INCORPORATED
Lance�A Ll ewel 1 yn, P. E.
cc James Goddette w/encls.
LAL:amo
Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN INCORPORATED
Engineering and Planning Services
The Kiln • 15 Brickyard Road • Essex Junction • Vermont • 05452 • (802) 878-3000
1 July 1985
Chief James Goddette
South Burlington Fire Department
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
RE: Stonehedge Clusters M & N
FILE: 8143
Dear Chief Goddette:
The enclosed site plans for Stonehedge Clusters M & N reflect
the changes in building locations previously discussed.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Please call
if there are additional questions.
Sincerely,
FITZPATRIC ELLYN INCORPORATED
Lance A. Lleweliyn, P.E.
cc Jane Bechtel,
LAL:amo
Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting
�r
MEMORANDUM
To: William J. Szymanski, City Manager
From: David H. Spitz, City Planner
Re: Potter Park - Land Swap
Date: 10/15/81
The federal government has approved the Potter Park Land Swap (see
attached letter). however, several questions were raised about the appraisal;
and the appraiser must reply to those questions. It is possible that the
final appraisal will go up, but that should only be for a small amount.
We plan to close on the land purchase next week. Federal and State
reimbursement will take place later, shortly after all questions related
to the appraisal have been resolved.
The amount we must pay next week is $199,428. Federal reimbursement,
based on the current appraisal, will be $99,367 (approximately 50%). State
reimbursement is based on an earlier approval and will be $54,900 (slightly
under 30%). Our balance will be $45,161.
If the final appraisal amount will be changed, it will be primarily due
to the year that has passed since the original appraisal. I don't expect
the amount to go up more than $1,000 an acre, or a total of $13,500. The
State will not pay any portion of that additional cost, but the Federal
Government will probably pay 50% of it. We will have to pay the balance.
r
5.-
State of V ermont
Department of Fish and Game
Department of Forests, Parks, and Recreation
Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering
Division of Protection
Natural Resources Conservation Council
Mr. David Spitz
S. Burlington Planning Office
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
A(:I-;ti(:Y OF F.NVIRONN1FNYAL (J)INS URN ATI()�%
Montpelier, Vernttrnt 0:50o2
14TAH'fNif'AT OF FORESTS, PARKS AND HF.t.HF.ATION
October 14, 1981
RE: Project 50-00325-T, S. Burlington Nowland/Stonehed7e Acq.
Dear Dave:
I have been in touch with the Regional Office about South Burlington's
acquisition of the Nowland property. Because you have an approved project,
you can go ahead and purchase the land even though we do not have an approved
appraisal. It is possible that the appraisal may be revised up, in which case
you would have to go back and offer the additional amount to the seller. It
may also be revised down, in which case you could not be reimbursed for any
amount over the appraised value.
Once we have an approved appraisal, you can send us all the documentation
for billing. If you have any questions, please get in touch with me.
Sincerely, /
Peter Strobridge
LWCF Grants Administrator
PS/smh
cc: Bruce O'Neill
FITZPATRICK-LLEWELLYN ASSOCIATES
Engineering and Planning Services
The Kiln • Brickyard Road • Essex Junction • Vermont • 05452 • (802) 878-3000
October 22, 1981
Mr. William Szymanski, P.E.
City Manager
City of South Burlington
575 Dorset Street
South Burlington, Vermont 05401
Re: Stonehedge Condominiums - Phase 1
Loop Road Widening Amendment
File: 8155
Dear Mr. Szymanski:
To clarify our present understanding of the nature of the improvements you would
accept for Stonehedge Drive (Phase 1 - Loop Road) to become a City Street, we offer
the following:
1. A contract has been let for the removal of up to four feet of material ''
immediately adjacent to the existing Phase 1 Loop Road. Following removal,
fifteen inches of gravel aril three inches of crusher run gravel were to
be placed and compacted.
2. The work described in l above has been completed.
3. We propose to pave up to three feet from the existing loop road edge
thereby providing a twenty-three foot wide road and a one foot plus
shoulder.
4. The shoulder shall be covered with topsoil and seeded.
5. The bituminous pavement shall be placed in two lifts as follows:
a. 12 inch base course
b. 1 inch wear course
6. The City of South Burlington, Vermont will approve the above and accept
same as a City Street.
7. Stonehedge - Phase 2 loop road will be constructed in accordance with the
Cit of SouthBurlington stand ds
, /.� ��l•
8 �e v�C�f/dT�.,f�sA/. �► It ��•.s�s�vaw/��o�iv►� � ,�%��►✓/�f • G.
To expedite construction within the next few days we request your acceptance and
approval of the above. Thank you for your considerations.
Accepted and Approved Very truly yours,
FIT,�Z..P--ATRICK-T I WE LYNN ASSOCIATES
William Szymanski (date) Lance A. Llewellyn,-P.E.
Design • Inspection • Studies • Permitting
f