HomeMy WebLinkAboutSD-73-0000 - Decision - 0000 Stonehedge Drive (2)SOUTH BURLINGTON PL_WIING CONTISSION February 13, 1973
requirement.
It was reported that Barbara Bull of the Natural Resources Committee said
that not all of the northerly side of the brook was accessible because of high
rater conditions.
7?r. I•-larvin moved that the Plannin; Commission accept both of these documents
(right-of--T,�y deed and open space agreement) and recorm-gend to the City Council
their approval provided the t,renty foot -walkway along the brook is accessible.
Mr. Broirn seconded the motion.
'i'he motion passed 3 - 1 with I-Irs. I-Iaher dissenting. She said she agreed
crith the twenty foot right -of -;ray but not vrith the open space agreement.
The City Manager was asked to consult with the Natural Resources Committee
about the right-of-way along Potash Brook and to check lvrith the City Attorney
about the 15' open space question.
5. Continue subdivision hearing - Mr. Henry Potter - Tabled from January
30, 1973 meeting. Mr. Terry Boyle will be present.
The letter from Mr. Ewing in reference to questions on the Potter development
was rel-.d Pnd is filed with these minutes.
Mr. Boyle said the developer is offering the 2.2 acre parcel to the city.
r'Ir. Tudhope expressed his ,•rish that the park agreement had been worked out prior
to this m--,eting.
s. Robert L?.rson asked about run off into the Tond. Mr. Boyle said there
-.rill be a, slight increase in run off. He pointed out the drainage system and
noted that 69` of the area .-rill be open grass area.
nor. Tudnope read a letter -7rom Mr. Robert Lang which posed several questions
about the development. Mr. Bailey noted that many of the questions asked -:rere
SOUTI? BURLINGTOTI PIyM11TIG COMMISSION -6- February 13, 1973
already answered over the last year.
Mr. Szymanski said that the water system for the development will be tied
into the Andrews Street or Oak Hill Drive line to form a grid and could be utilized
in an emergency.
Mr. Tudhone called for a recess to prepare a motion.
Mr. Tudhope called the meeting to order. Hr. Bailey moved that the ?lanning
Commission approve the Potter Development as shown on two-_la.ns dated January 30,
1973• That approval be granted with the modifications as stated in the July 11,
1972 minutes and the letter of Ewing and Spokes dated February 13, 1973• Approval
granted pending final agreement between the City Council and the developer on
the park. Bonds for all utilities for private and public streets be posted as re-
quired by the City Manager. It is further understood that a final landscaping plan
be submitted to the Planning Commission. It is further understood that -plans as
shoim are for phase one and two which represent 92 units; the developer will re-
turn to the Planning Commission before further development. It is further under-
stood that the developer will make the necessary sewer corrections on Imperial Drive
and Shelburne Road. It is further understood that a final utility plan will be
submitted for approval by the City ;tanager. In the C area, no trees are to be cut
except a dead ems. ?trs. Maher seconded the motion and it was unanimously passed.
6. Continue the discussion re: Corrections .,enter, S*.gift and Farrell Streets.
It was decided that Dr. Brown's motion at the Februa.ry 12, 1973 meeting of the
City Council did not call for a Planning Commission recommendation.
Approved: